FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

6.18 · Diti Vows to Kill King Indra

73 verses
C Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15526 chars)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

C - Chitraketu (14-19)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Cursed

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Cursed Chapter 17 Along with seeing the Lord, Chitraketu was also benedicted with rulership over the Vidyadhara planet. As he enjoyed in that realm, travelling from place-toplace, he once encountered Lord Siva publicly embracing Parvati, surrounded by an august assembly of Siddhas, Caranas and great sages. Chitraketu was astonished by the sight and laughed loudly, much to the disapproval of Parvati. There was no offensive intention since Chitraketu was simply exhibiting his amazement at Lord Siva’s aloofness. Nevertheless, Parvati, entirely unimpressed by his reaction, cursed him to become a demon. Chitraketu humbly accepted it without protest. Devotees, Siva said, never fear any condition of life – heaven, hell or liberation are all the same since their only aspiration is to serve the Lord. Chitraketu thus became the ‘demon’ Vritrasura in his next life.

Previous Chitraketu Enlightened Next Diti, Indra and the Maruts Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Enlightened

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Enlightened Chapter 15, 16 The two sages instructed Chitraketu in the harsh realities of life; all relationships of this world are temporary, and the material designations we assume are ultimately imaginary. The illuminating knowledge empowered Chitraketu to gain a broader perspective. Being eager for more, Narada guided Chitraketu in cultivating an internal detachment and gave him a mantra to chant. Then, by his mystic potency, Narada empowered the child to speak words of wisdom which further highlighted the transitory nature of everything in this world. The funeral ceremony was performed and the envious queens were so ashamed of their conduct that they gave up the aspiration to have children. The sages departed and Chitraketu dedicated himself to reciting the mantra given to him by Narada. Within days he was able to have the direct vision of Lord Sesa, and he overflowed with gratitude. Pleased by his prayers, the Supreme Lord explained further knowledge of Himself to Chitraketu.

Previous Chitraketu’s Lamentation Next Chitraketu Cursed Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu’s Lamentation

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu’s Lamentation Chapter 14 When Maharaja Pariksit enquired how a demon could possess such exalted consciousness, Sukadeva Goswami described Vritrasura’s previous birth as Chitraketu. Despite marrying ten million wives, Chitraketu had no children. When the great sage Angira Rishi visited, Chitraketu warmly received him. He frankly expressed his dissatisfaction to the sage, who mercifully arranged for his first wife, Krtadyuti, to have a son. There was, however, a caveat – he predicted the child would bring both happiness ( harsa ) and lamentation ( soka ). Upon the birth of this son, Chitraketu and all the citizens were overjoyed. His dream had finally been fulfilled! The other wives, however, didn’t share that joy, feeling neglected and sidelined by their husband. Clouded by envy and overcome by selfishness, they administered poison to the child and mercilessly killed him. Krtadyuti fainted in shock, the inhabitants of the palace were in tears and Chitraketu practically lost all consciousness! The mother condemned the cruel acts of providence and begged her child to wake up, but it was futile. Understanding their pain, the sages Narada and Angira arrived on the scene to offer enlightening words.

Previous C - Chitraketu (14-19) Next Chitraketu Enlightened Last updated 1 year ago

Diti, Indra and the Maruts

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Diti, Indra and the Maruts Chapter 18, 19 Sukadeva Goswami continued describing the descendants of Daksa’s daughters, particularly Diti (mother of the demons) and Aditi (mother of the demigods). Those offspring became known as the Daityas and Adityas respectively. Diti had a grudge against Indra since Vishnu had appeared to save him by killing her sons, Hiranyaksa and Hiranyakasipu. Angered, she now desired another son who would kill Indra. Through her womanly charm she conquered Kasyapa, her husband, who agreed to unite with her. When she expressed what kind of child she wanted, however, he was shocked and condemned himself. Nevertheless, Kasyapa ingeniously instructed Diti to strictly follow the Vaisnava austerity of Pumsavana-vrata. This would satisfy her desire for a son, but simultaneously purify her consciousness from the enmity towards Indra and the demigods. While Diti engaged in the vow ( vrata ), Indra closely monitored her every move, looking for some discrepancy to capitalise upon. When Indra caught her in violation of the strict regulations, he entered her womb and sliced the embryo into forty-nine parts. Those children became known as the Maruts, who later made friends with Indra and were saved. Upon the request of Maharaja Pariksit, Sukadeva Goswami went on to explain the details of the Pumsavana-vrata.

Previous Chitraketu Cursed Next River of Names Last updated 1 year ago

River of Names

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names “The instructions given by Narada and Angira Muni are the true spiritual instructions for the illusioned conditioned soul. This world is temporary, but because of our previous karma we come here and accept bodies, creating temporary relationships in terms of society, friendship, love, nationality and community, which are all finished at death. These temporary relationships did not exist in the past, nor will they exist in the future. Therefore, at the present moment the so-called relationships are illusions.” (SB 6.15.2) When Maharaja Chitraketu was overwhelmed by lamentation at the sudden death of his beloved son, he received a series of transcendental instructions. Firstly, the great sages Narada and Angira came and reminded Chitraketu about the body, soul, inevitable death and the subsequent transmigration that everyone will experience. Later, Chitraketu’s son came back to life and spoke to the King, quite bluntly stating: “In which birth were these individuals my mother and father? No one is actually my mother and father. How can I accept these two people as my parents?” Later, after absorbing himself in prayer, Chitraketu was further enlightened in transcendental knowledge by the Supreme Lord Himself. At every stage he received powerful insights to elevate his consciousness and bring perspective to the situation he was facing. The Srimad-Bhagavatam offers a series of interesting analogies to describe the transitory nature of relationships in this material world: Tourists meeting in a hotel: “Thereafter, Devayani, the daughter of Sukracarya, understood that the materialistic association of husband, friends and relatives is like the association in a hotel full of tourists. The relationships of society, friendship and love are created by the maya of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, exactly as in a dream.” (SB 9.19.27-28) Travellers in a restaurant: “My dear mother, in a restaurant or place for drinking cold water, many travellers are brought together, and after drinking water they continue to their respective destinations. Similarly, living entities join together in a family, and later, as a result of their own actions, they are led apart to their destinations.” (SB 7.2.21) Sticks meeting in the river: “Many planks and sticks, unable to stay together, are carried away by the force of a river’s waves. Similarly, although we are intimately related with friends and family members, we are unable to stay together because of our varied past deeds and the waves of time.” (SB 10.5.25) Fallible Soldiers in an army: “Persons devoid of atma-tattva do not enquire into the problems of life, being too attached to the fallible soldiers like the body, children and wife. Although sufficiently experienced, they still do not see their inevitable destruction.” (SB 2.1.4) Dreams that will end: “In a dream we form a society of friendship and love, and when we awaken we see that it has ceased to exist. Similarly, one’s gross society, family and love are also a dream, and this dream will be over as soon as one dies. Therefore, whether one is dreaming in a subtle way or a gross way, these dreams are all false and temporary.” (SB 7.14.3-4) Elements scattered by the wind: “Just as the wind brings together masses of clouds, blades of grass, wisps of cotton and particles of dust, only to scatter them all again, so the creator deals with His created beings in the same way.” (SB 10.82.43) In a conversation with Dhritarastra, Akrura concludes: “In this world no one has any permanent relationship with anyone else, O King. We cannot stay forever even with our own body, what to speak of our wife, children and the rest. Every creature is born alone and dies alone, and alone one experiences the just rewards of his good and evil deeds.” (SB 10.49.20-21) So how do we mediate the relationships of this world? Are all of our connections ultimately meaningless and simply a waste of time?

Previous Diti, Indra and the Maruts Next Attention vs Attachment Last updated 1 year ago

Attention vs Attachment

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Attention vs Attachment Without genuinely investing in relationships, situations and aspirations, how can we make any real progress in those areas? Where the attention goes, energy flows and results invariably show. Simultaneously, however, wisdom teachers constantly remind us to remain detached and aloof; everything in this world is a fleeting reality destined for destruction at the ruthless hands of time. In ultimate reality, we are building castles in the sand. So what’s the balance? When does genuine concern and responsibility evolve into an unhealthy attachment? How can we identify the extremes of over-zealous endeavour and irresponsible aloofness? Is it possible to cultivate a spiritually elevated consciousness whilst sensitively navigating day-to-day realities and responsibilities? The Srimad-Bhagavatam makes a clear distinction between being attentive and being attached. Every spiritual practitioner should know how to strike the balance and avoid overstepping the line. Intelligence vs Emotion (The Driver) – an attentive person is driven to act by spiritual intelligence, clearly understanding the broader need and purpose behind their endeavour. An attached person, however, is driven by fleeting emotions and is therefore flickering in effort and determination. It’s not that an attentive person is not passionate or emotionally involved, but every endeavour is founded upon wisdom and knowledge. Are you driven by intelligence or emotion? Endeavour vs Result (The Success) – an attentive person invests energy in crafting a perfect endeavour, doing everything within their control to make the best attempt possible. This is their measure of success. An attached person, however, evaluates success based on the outcome and result. An attentive person is not indifferent to the results, but simply uses them to understand how they can refine and improve their endeavour. Are you concerned about giving your best or achieving the best? Eternal vs Temporary (The Vision) – an attentive person is always awake to the backdrop of spiritual reality, though living and functioning in the ‘real’ world. An attached person, however, engrossed and entangled in their vision of this temporary life, is rendered oblivious to the ‘bigger picture.’ Attentive people are undoubtedly practical, but simultaneously transcendental. How many of your desires, decisions and directions are formulated with reference to the ultimate purpose of life?

Previous River of Names Next Transcendental Affection Last updated 1 year ago

Transcendental Affection

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Transcendental Affection In the First Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam we find the striking prayers of Queen Kunti. With regards to family attachments, she prays: “O Lord of the universe, soul of the universe, O personality of the form of the universe, please, therefore, sever my tie of affection for my kinsmen, the Pandavas and the Vrsnis. O Lord of Madhu, as the Ganges forever flows to the sea without hindrance, let my attraction be constantly drawn unto You without being diverted to anyone else.” ( SB 1.8.41 - 42 ) In the purport, Srila Prabhupada clarifies how affection cannot be annihilated, but must be redirected in a spiritual way: “Perfection of pure devotional service is attained when all attention is diverted towards the transcendental loving service of the Lord. To cut off the tie of all other affections does not mean complete negation of the finer elements, like affection for someone else. This is not possible. A living being, whoever he may be, must have this feeling of affection for others because this is a symptom of life… The so-called affection for family, society, country, etc., consists of different phases of sense gratification. When this desire is changed for the satisfaction of the Lord, it is called devotional service.” (SB 1.8.42) But we may still wonder why Queen Kunti’s affection for her family members, who were all Krishna’s devotees, is problematic. Srila Prabhupada further clarifies: “Her affection for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis is not out of the range of devotional service because the service of the Lord and the service of the devotees are identical. Sometimes service to the devotee is more valuable than service to the Lord. But here the affection of Kuntidevi for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis was due to family relation. This tie of affection in terms of material relation is the relation of maya because the relations of the body or the mind are due to the influence of the external energy. Relations of the soul, established in relation with the Supreme Soul, are factual relations. When Kuntidevi wanted to cut off the family relation, she meant to cut off the relation of the skin. The skin relation is the cause of material bondage, but the relation of the soul is the cause of freedom.” (SB 1.8.42)

Previous Attention vs Attachment Next O.P.E.N Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ పృశ్నిస్తు పత్నీ సవితు: సావిత్రీం వ్యాహృతిం త్రయీమ్ । అగ్నిహోత్రం పశుం సోమం చాతుర్మాస్యం మహామఖాన్ ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
pṛśnis tu patnī savituḥ
[prishnis tu patnee savituh]
sāvitrīṁ vyāhṛtiṁ trayīm
[saavitreem vyaahritim trayeem]
agnihotraṁ paśuṁ somaṁ
[agnihotram pashum somam]
cāturmāsyaṁ mahā-makhān
[chaaturmaasyam mahaa-makhaan]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said pṛśniḥ — Pṛśni tu — then patnī — wife savituḥ — of Savitā sāvitrīm — Sāvitrī vyāhṛtim — Vyāhṛti trayīm — Trayī agnihotram — Agnihotra paśum — Paśu somam — Soma cāturmāsyam — Cāturmāsya mahā-makhān — the five Mahāyajṣas.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
pṛśnis tu patnī savituḥ
pṛśniḥ
Pṛśni
tu
then
patnī
wife
savituḥ
of Savitā
sāvitrīṁ vyāhṛtiṁ trayīm
sāvitrīm
Sāvitrī
vyāhṛtim
Vyāhṛti
trayīm
Trayī
agnihotraṁ paśuṁ somaṁ
agnihotram
Agnihotra
paśum
Paśu
somam
Soma
cāturmāsyaṁ mahā-makhān
cāturmāsyam
Cāturmāsya
mahā-makhān
the five Mahāyajṣas.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Pṛśni, who was the wife of Savitā, the fifth of the twelve sons of Aditi, gave birth to three daughters — Sāvitrī, Vyāhṛti and Trayī — and the sons named Agnihotra, Paśu, Soma, Cāturmāsya and the five Mahāyajṣas.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Pṛśni, who was the wife of Savitā, the fifth of the twelve sons of Aditi, gave birth to three daughters—Sāvitrī, Vyāhṛti and Trayī—and the sons named Agnihotra, Paśu, Soma, Cāturmāsya and the five Mahāyajṣas. The Eighteenth Chapter describes how Diti, whose sons had been killed by Viṣṇu, performed austerities for a son to kill Indra, and how, after Indra cut the child in Diti’s womb to pieces, the embryo became the Maruts. In relating the descendents of Aditi’s sons, the fourth son was mentioned as Tvaṣṭā. In relation to him, the story of Viśvarūpa’s murder and the curse of Citraketu were described. Now the description of Aditi’s descendents from the fifth and other sons is given. Paśum means animal sacrifice. Mahāmakhān means five sacrifices. The verb is in the following verse.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.2

↗
సిద్ధిర్భగస్య భార్యాఙ్గ మహిమానం విభుం ప్రభుమ్ । ఆశిషం చ వరారోహాం కన్యాం ప్రాసూత సువ్రతామ్ ॥ ౨ ॥
siddhir bhagasya bhāryāṅga
[siddhir bhagasya bhaaryaanga]
mahimānaṁ vibhuṁ prabhum
[mahimaanam vibhum prabhum]
āśiṣaṁ ca varārohāṁ
[aashisham cha varaarohaam]
kanyāṁ prāsūta suvratām
[kanyaam praasoota suvrataam]
siddhiḥ — Siddhi bhagasya — of Bhaga bhāryā — the wife aṅga — my dear King mahimānam — Mahimā vibhum — Vibhu prabhum — Prabhu āśiṣam — Āśī ca — and varārohām — very beautiful kanyām — daughter prāsūta — bore su-vratām — virtuous.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
siddhir bhagasya bhāryāṅga
siddhiḥ
Siddhi
bhagasya
of Bhaga
bhāryā
the wife
aṅga
my dear King
mahimānaṁ vibhuṁ prabhum
mahimānam
Mahimā
vibhum
Vibhu
prabhum
Prabhu
āśiṣaṁ ca varārohāṁ
āśiṣam
Āśī
ca
and
varārohām
very beautiful
kanyāṁ prāsūta suvratām
kanyām
daughter
prāsūta
bore
su-vratām
virtuous.
O King, Siddhi, who was the wife of Bhaga, the sixth son of Aditi, bore three sons, named Mahimā, Vibhu and Prabhu, and one extremely beautiful daughter, whose name was Āśī.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King, Siddhi, who was the wife of Bhaga, the sixth son of Aditi, bore three sons, named Mahimā, Vibhu and Prabhu, and one extremely beautiful daughter, whose name was Āśī.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.3-4

↗
ధాతు: కుహూ: సినీవాలీ రాకా చానుమతిస్తథా । సాయం దర్శమథ ప్రాత: పూర్ణమాసమనుక్రమాత్ ॥ ౩ ॥ అగ్నీన్ పురీష్యానాధత్త క్రియాయాం సమనన్తర: । చర్షణీ వరుణస్యాసీద్యస్యాం జాతో భృగు: పున: ॥ ౪ ॥
dhātuḥ kuhūḥ sinīvālī
[dhaatuh kuhooh sineevaalee]
rākā cānumatis tathā
[raakaa chaanumatis tathaa]
sāyaṁ darśam atha prātaḥ
[saayam darsham atha praatah]
pūrṇamāsam anukramāt
[poornamaasam anukramaat]
agnīn purīṣyān ādhatta
[agneen pureeshyaan aadhatta]
kriyāyāṁ samanantaraḥ
[kriyaayaam samanantarah]
carṣaṇī varuṇasyāsīd
[charshanee varunasyaaseed]
yasyāṁ jāto bhṛguḥ punaḥ
[yasyaam jaato bhriguh punah]
dhātuḥ — of Dhātā kuhūḥ — Kuhū sinīvālī — Sinīvālī rākā — Rākā ca — and anumatiḥ — Anumati tathā — also sāyam — Sāyam darśam — Darśa atha — also prātaḥ — Prātaḥ pūrṇamāsam — Pūrṇamāsa anukramāt — respectively agnīn — fire-gods purīṣyān — called the Purīṣyas ādhatta — begot kriyāyām — in Kriyā samanantaraḥ — the next son, Vidhātā carṣaṇī — Carṣaṇī varuṇasya — of Varuṇa āsīt — was yasyām — in whom jātaḥ — took birth bhṛguḥ — Bhṛgu punaḥ — again.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhātuḥ kuhūḥ sinīvālī
dhātuḥ
of Dhātā
kuhūḥ
Kuhū
sinīvālī
Sinīvālī
rākā cānumatis tathā
rākā
Rākā
ca
and
anumatiḥ
Anumati
tathā
also
sāyaṁ darśam atha prātaḥ
sāyam
Sāyam
darśam
Darśa
atha
also
prātaḥ
Prātaḥ
pūrṇamāsam anukramāt
pūrṇamāsam
Pūrṇamāsa
anukramāt
respectively
agnīn purīṣyān ādhatta
agnīn
fire-gods
purīṣyān
called the Purīṣyas
ādhatta
begot
kriyāyāṁ samanantaraḥ
kriyāyām
in Kriyā
samanantaraḥ
the next son, Vidhātā
carṣaṇī varuṇasyāsīd
carṣaṇī
Carṣaṇī
varuṇasya
of Varuṇa
āsīt
was
yasyāṁ jāto bhṛguḥ punaḥ
yasyām
in whom
jātaḥ
took birth
bhṛguḥ
Bhṛgu
punaḥ
again.
Dhātā, the seventh son of Aditi, had four wives, named Kuhū, Sinīvālī, Rākā and Anumati. These wives begot four sons, named Sāyam, Darśa, Prātaḥ and Pūrṇamāsa respectively. The wife of Vidhātā, the eighth son of Aditi, was named Kriyā. In her Vidhātā begot the five fire-gods named the Purīṣyas. The wife of Varuṇa, the ninth son of Aditi, was named Carṣaṇī. Bhṛgu, the son of Brahmā, took birth again in her womb.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Dhātā, the seventh son of Aditi, had four wives, named Kuhū, Sinīvālī, Rākā and Anumati. These wives begot four sons, named Sāyam, Darśa, Prātaḥ and Pūrṇamāsa respectively. The wife of Vidhātā, the eighth son of Aditi, was named Kriyā. In her Vidhātā begot the five fire-gods named the Purīṣyas. The wife of Varuṇa, the ninth son of Aditi, was named Carṣaṇī. Bhṛgu, the son of Brahmā, took birth again in her womb. Samanantaraḥ refers to Vidhātā, the eighth son. In his wife Kriyā he bore the fires called Purīṣyas. Śruti says paṣcacitīḥ purīṣyāso ’gnaya: the five fires are called Purīṣya. Carṣaṇī was the wife of Varuṇa. Previously Bhṛgu was born as the son of Brahmā, but was again born as Varuṇa’s son. [Note: Varuṇa wsa the ninth son of Aditi. The list is given in SB 6.6.39.] Bhṛgu and Vālmīkī were the sons of Varuṇa alone whereas Agastya and Vaśiṣṭha were sons of both Varuṇa and Mitra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.5

↗
వాల్మీకిశ్చ మహాయోగీ వల్మీకాదభవత్కిల । అగస్త్యశ్చ వసిష్ఠశ్చ మిత్రావరుణయోఋర్షీ ॥ ౫ ॥
vālmīkiś ca mahā-yogī
[vaalmeekish cha mahaa-yogee]
valmīkād abhavat kila
[valmeekaad abhavat kila]
agastyaś ca vasiṣṭhaś ca
[agastyash cha vasishthash cha]
mitrā-varuṇayor ṛṣī
[mitraa-varunayor rishee]
vālmīkiḥ — Vālmīki ca — and mahā-yogī — the great mystic valmīkāt — from an anthill abhavat — took birth kila — indeed agastyaḥ — Agastya ca — and vasiṣṭhaḥ — Vasiṣṭha ca — also mitrā-varuṇayoḥ — of Mitra and Varuṇa ṛṣī — the two sages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vālmīkiś ca mahā-yogī
vālmīkiḥ
Vālmīki
ca
and
mahā-yogī
the great mystic
valmīkād abhavat kila
valmīkāt
from an anthill
abhavat
took birth
kila
indeed
agastyaś ca vasiṣṭhaś ca
agastyaḥ
Agastya
ca
and
vasiṣṭhaḥ
Vasiṣṭha
ca
also
mitrā-varuṇayor ṛṣī
mitrā-varuṇayoḥ
of Mitra and Varuṇa
ṛṣī
the two sages.
By the semen of Varuṇa, the great mystic Vālmīki took birth from an anthill. Bhṛgu and Vālmīki were specific sons of Varuṇa, whereas Agastya and Vasiṣṭha Ṛṣis were the common sons of Varuṇa and Mitra, the tenth son of Aditi.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vālmīki took birth from an anthill. Agastya and Vaśiṣṭha were the sons of both Varuṇa, the ninth son, and Mitra, the tenth son of Aditi. The normal sons of Mitra will be explained in the next verse. Sons of common birth from both Mitra and Varuṇa were the sages Agastya and Vaśiṣṭha.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.6

↗
రేత: సిషిచతు: కుమ్భే ఉర్వశ్యా: సన్నిధౌ ద్రుతమ్ । రేవత్యాం మిత్ర ఉత్సర్గమరిష్టం పిప్పలం వ్యధాత్ ॥ ౬ ॥
retaḥ siṣicatuḥ kumbhe
[retah sishichatuh kumbhe]
urvaśyāḥ sannidhau drutam
[urvashyaah sannidhau drutam]
revatyāṁ mitra utsargam
[revatyaam mitra utsargam]
ariṣṭaṁ pippalaṁ vyadhāt
[arishtam pippalam vyadhaat]
retaḥ — semen siṣicatuḥ — discharged kumbhe — in an earthen pot urvaśyāḥ — of Urvaśī sannidhau — in the presence drutam — flown revatyām — in Revatī mitraḥ — Mitra utsargam — Utsarga ariṣṭam — Ariṣṭa pippalam — Pippala vyadhāt — begot.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
retaḥ siṣicatuḥ kumbhe
retaḥ
semen
siṣicatuḥ
discharged
kumbhe
in an earthen pot
urvaśyāḥ sannidhau drutam
urvaśyāḥ
of Urvaśī
sannidhau
in the presence
drutam
flown
revatyāṁ mitra utsargam
revatyām
in Revatī
mitraḥ
Mitra
utsargam
Utsarga
ariṣṭaṁ pippalaṁ vyadhāt
ariṣṭam
Ariṣṭa
pippalam
Pippala
vyadhāt
begot.
Upon seeing Urvaśī, the celestial society girl, both Mitra and Varuṇa discharged semen, which they preserved in an earthen pot. The two sons Agastya and Vasiṣṭha later appeared from that pot, and they are therefore the common sons of Mitra and Varuṇa. Mitra begot three sons in the womb of his wife, whose name was Revatī. Their names were Utsarga, Ariṣṭa and Pippala.

Modern science is trying to generate living entities in test tubes by processing semen, but even long, long ago it was possible for semen kept in a pot to develop into a child.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of the presence of Urvaśī, Mitra and Varuṇa discharged semen in a pot from which Agastya and Vaśiṣṭha were born.) Mitra begot three sons in the womb of his wife, whose name was Revatī. Their names were Utsarga, Ariṣṭa and Pippala. Agastya and Vaśiṣṭha were the sons of both Varuṇa and Mitra because they discharged semen in a pot. The śruti says kumbhe retaḥ siṣicatuḥ samānam: they discharged semen together in a pot. Drutam means flowed.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.7

↗
పౌలోమ్యామిన్ద్ర ఆధత్త త్రీన్ పుత్రానితి న: శ్రుతమ్ । జయన్తమృషభం తాత తృతీయం మీఢుషం ప్రభు: ॥ ౭ ॥
paulomyām indra ādhatta
[paulomyaam indra aadhatta]
trīn putrān iti naḥ śrutam
[treen putraan iti nah shrutam]
jayantam ṛṣabhaṁ tāta
[jayantam rishabham taata]
tṛtīyaṁ mīḍhuṣaṁ prabhuḥ
[triteeyam meedhusham prabhuh]
paulomyām — in Paulomī (Śacīdevī) indraḥ — Indra ādhatta — begot trīn — three putrān — sons iti — thus naḥ — by us śrutam — heard jayantam — Jayanta ṛṣabham — Ṛṣabha tāta — my dear King tṛtīyam — third mīḍhuṣam — Mīḍhuṣa prabhuḥ — the lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paulomyām indra ādhatta
paulomyām
in Paulomī (Śacīdevī)
indraḥ
Indra
ādhatta
begot
trīn putrān iti naḥ śrutam
trīn
three
putrān
sons
iti
thus
naḥ
by us
śrutam
heard
jayantam ṛṣabhaṁ tāta
jayantam
Jayanta
ṛṣabham
Ṛṣabha
tāta
my dear King
tṛtīyaṁ mīḍhuṣaṁ prabhuḥ
tṛtīyam
third
mīḍhuṣam
Mīḍhuṣa
prabhuḥ
the lord.
O King Parīkṣit, Indra, the King of the heavenly planets and eleventh son of Aditi, begot three sons, named Jayanta, Ṛṣabha and Mīḍhuṣa, in the womb of his wife, Paulomī. Thus we have heard.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit, Indra, the eleventh son of Aditi, begot three sons, named Jayanta, Ṛṣabha and Mīḍhuṣa, in the womb of his wife, Paulomī. Thus we have heard.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.8

↗
ఉరుక్రమస్య దేవస్య మాయావామనరూపిణ: । కీర్తౌ పత్‍న్‍యాం బృహచ్ఛ్‌లోకస్తస్యాసన్ సౌభగాదయ: ॥ ౮ ॥
urukramasya devasya
[urukramasya devasya]
māyā-vāmana-rūpiṇaḥ
[maayaa-vaamana-roopinah]
kīrtau patnyāṁ bṛhacchlokas
[keertau patnyaam brihachchlokas]
tasyāsan saubhagādayaḥ
[tasyaasan saubhagaadayah]
urukramasya — of Urukrama devasya — the Lord māyā — by His internal potency vāmana-rūpiṇaḥ — having the form of a dwarf kīrtau — in Kīrti patnyām — His wife bṛhacchlokaḥ — Bṛhatśloka tasya — of him āsan — were saubhaga-ādayaḥ — sons beginning with Saubhaga.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
urukramasya devasya
urukramasya
of Urukrama
devasya
the Lord
māyā-vāmana-rūpiṇaḥ
māyā
by His internal potency
vāmana-rūpiṇaḥ
having the form of a dwarf
kīrtau patnyāṁ bṛhacchlokas
kīrtau
in Kīrti
patnyām
His wife
bṛhacchlokaḥ
Bṛhatśloka
tasyāsan saubhagādayaḥ
tasya
of him
āsan
were
saubhaga-ādayaḥ
sons beginning with Saubhaga.
By His own potency, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who has multifarious potencies, appeared in the form of a dwarf as Urukrama, the twelfth son of Aditi. In the womb of His wife, whose name was Kīrti, He begot one son, named Bṛhatśloka, who had many sons, headed by Saubhaga.

As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (4.6) :

ajo ’pi sann avyayātmā bhūtānām īśvaro ’pi san prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya sambhavāmy ātma-māyayā

“Although I am unborn and My transcendental body never deteriorates, and although I am the Lord of all sentient beings, I still appear in every millennium in My original transcendental form.” When the Supreme Personality of Godhead incarnates, He does not need any help from the external energy, for He appears as He is by His own potency. The spiritual potency is also called māyā. It is said, ato māyāmayaṁ viṣṇuṁ pravadanti manīṣiṇaḥ: the body accepted by the Supreme Personality of Godhead is called māyāmaya. This does not mean that He is formed of the external energy; this māyā refers to His internal potency.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Urukrama, or Vāmana, the twelfth son of Aditi, who appeared through the Lord’s spiritual potency, begot one son, named Bṛhatśloka, in the womb of his wife Kīrti. Bṛhatśloka had many sons, headed by Saubhaga. Māyā here refers to the eternal svarūpa-śakti of the Lord, which is also called māyā. Madhva gives the following scriptural evidence for this meaning. Ato māyāmayaṁ viṣṇuṁ pravadanti manīṣiṇaḥ: the wise called Viṣṇu the person made of māyā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.9

↗
తత్కర్మగుణవీర్యాణి కాశ్యపస్య మహాత్మన: । పశ్చాద్వక్ష్యామహేఽదిత్యాం యథైవావతతార హ ॥ ౯ ॥
tat-karma-guṇa-vīryāṇi
[tat-karma-guna-veeryaani]
kāśyapasya mahātmanaḥ
[kaashyapasya mahaatmanah]
paścād vakṣyāmahe ’dityāṁ
[pashchaad vakshyaamahe ’dityaam]
yathaivāvatatāra ha
[yathaivaavatataara ha]
tat — His karma — activities guṇa — qualities vīryāṇi — and power kāśyapasya — of the son of Kaśyapa mahā-ātmanaḥ — the great soul paścāt — later vakṣyāmahe — I shall describe adityām — in Aditi yathā — how eva — certainly avatatāra — descended ha — indeed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-karma-guṇa-vīryāṇi
tat
His
karma
activities
guṇa
qualities
vīryāṇi
and power
kāśyapasya mahātmanaḥ
kāśyapasya
of the son of Kaśyapa
mahā-ātmanaḥ
the great soul
paścād vakṣyāmahe ’dityāṁ
paścāt
later
vakṣyāmahe
I shall describe
adityām
in Aditi
yathā
how
eva
certainly
yathaivāvatatāra ha
avatatāra
descended
ha
indeed.
Later [in the Eighth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam] I shall describe how Urukrama, Lord Vāmanadeva, appeared as the son of the great sage Kaśyapa and how He covered the three worlds with three steps. I shall describe the uncommon activities He performed, His qualities, His power and how He took birth from the womb of Aditi.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Later I shall describe how Urukrama, Vāmanadeva, the son of the great sage Kaśyapa, appeared from Aditi. This will be explained in the Eighth Canto.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.10

↗
అథ కశ్యపదాయాదాన్ దైతేయాన్ కీర్తయామి తే । యత్ర భాగవత: శ్రీమాన్ ప్రహ్రాదో బలిరేవ చ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
atha kaśyapa-dāyādān
[atha kashyapa-daayaadaan]
daiteyān kīrtayāmi te
[daiteyaan keertayaami te]
yatra bhāgavataḥ śrīmān
[yatra bhaagavatah shreemaan]
prahrādo balir eva ca
[prahraado balir eva cha]
atha — now kaśyapa-dāyādān — the sons of Kaśyapa daiteyān — born of Diti kīrtayāmi — I shall describe te — to you yatra — where bhāgavataḥ — the great devotee śrī-mān — glorious prahrādaḥ — Prahlāda baliḥ — Bali eva — certainly ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha kaśyapa-dāyādān
atha
now
kaśyapa-dāyādān
the sons of Kaśyapa
daiteyān
born of Diti
daiteyān kīrtayāmi te
kīrtayāmi
I shall describe
te
to you
yatra bhāgavataḥ śrīmān
yatra
where
bhāgavataḥ
the great devotee
śrī-mān
glorious
prahrādo balir eva ca
prahrādaḥ
Prahlāda
baliḥ
Bali
eva
certainly
ca
also.
Now let me describe the sons of Diti, who were begotten by Kaśyapa but who became demons. In this demoniac family the great devotee Prahlāda Mahārāja appeared, and Bali Mahārāja also appeared in that family. The demons are technically known as Daityas because they proceeded from the womb of Diti.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I will now describe the demon sons of Diti, who were begotten by Kaśyapa. In this demoniac family the great devotee Prahlāda Mahārāja and Bali Mahārāja also appeared. Here a new subject begins. Dāyadān means sons. Daiteyān means the sons of Diti.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.11

↗
దితేర్ద్వావేవ దాయాదౌ దైత్యదానవవన్దితౌ । హిరణ్యకశిపుర్నామ హిరణ్యాక్షశ్చ కీర్తితౌ ॥ ౧౧ ॥
diter dvāv eva dāyādau
[diter dvaav eva daayaadau]
daitya-dānava-vanditau
[daitya-daanava-vanditau]
hiraṇyakaśipur nāma
[hiranyakashipur naama]
hiraṇyākṣaś ca kīrtitau
[hiranyaakshash cha keertitau]
diteḥ — of Diti dvau — two eva — certainly dāyādau — sons daitya-dānava — by the Daityas and Dānavas vanditau — worshiped hiraṇyakaśipuḥ — Hiraṇyakaśipu nāma — named hiraṇyākṣaḥ — Hiraṇyākṣa ca — also kīrtitau — known.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
diter dvāv eva dāyādau
diteḥ
of Diti
dvau
two
eva
certainly
dāyādau
sons
daitya-dānava-vanditau
daitya-dānava
by the Daityas and Dānavas
vanditau
worshiped
hiraṇyakaśipur nāma
hiraṇyakaśipuḥ
Hiraṇyakaśipu
nāma
named
hiraṇyākṣaś ca kīrtitau
hiraṇyākṣaḥ
Hiraṇyākṣa
ca
also
kīrtitau
known.
First the two sons named Hiraṇyakaśipu and Hiraṇyākṣa took birth from Diti’s womb. Both of them were very powerful and were worshiped by the Daityas and Dānavas.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Two sons named Hiraṇyakaśipu and Hiraṇyākṣa, worshiped by the Daityas and Dānavas, took birth from Diti's womb.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.12-13

↗
హిరణ్యకశిపోర్భార్యా కయాధుర్నామ దానవీ । జమ్భస్య తనయా సా తు సుషువే చతుర: సుతాన్ ॥ ౧౨ ॥ సంహ్రాదం ప్రాగనుహ్రాదం హ్రాదం ప్రహ్రాదమేవ చ । తత్స్వసా సింహికా నామ రాహుం విప్రచితోఽగ్రహీత్ ॥ ౧౩ ॥
hiraṇyakaśipor bhāryā
[hiranyakashipor bhaaryaa]
kayādhur nāma dānavī
[kayaadhur naama daanavee]
jambhasya tanayā sā tu
[jambhasya tanayaa saa tu]
suṣuve caturaḥ sutān
[sushuve chaturah sutaan]
saṁhrādaṁ prāg anuhrādaṁ
[samhraadam praag anuhraadam]
hrādaṁ prahrādam eva ca
[hraadam prahraadam eva cha]
tat-svasā siṁhikā nāma
[tat-svasaa simhikaa naama]
rāhuṁ vipracito ’grahīt
[raahum viprachito ’graheet]
hiraṇyakaśipoḥ — of Hiraṇyakaśipu bhāryā — the wife kayādhuḥ — Kayādhu nāma — named dānavī — descendant of Danu jambhasya — of Jambha tanayā — daughter sā — she tu — indeed suṣuve — gave birth to caturaḥ — four sutān — sons saṁhrādam — Saṁhlāda prāk — first anuhrādam — Anuhlāda hrādam — Hlāda prahrādam — Prahlāda eva — also ca — and tat-svasā — his sister siṁhikā — Siṁhikā nāma — named rāhum — Rāhu vipracitaḥ — from Vipracit agrahīt — received.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hiraṇyakaśipor bhāryā
hiraṇyakaśipoḥ
of Hiraṇyakaśipu
bhāryā
the wife
kayādhur nāma dānavī
kayādhuḥ
Kayādhu
nāma
named
dānavī
descendant of Danu
jambhasya tanayā sā tu
jambhasya
of Jambha
tanayā
daughter
sā
she
tu
indeed
suṣuve caturaḥ sutān
suṣuve
gave birth to
caturaḥ
four
sutān
sons
saṁhrādaṁ prāg anuhrādaṁ
saṁhrādam
Saṁhlāda
prāk
first
anuhrādam
Anuhlāda
hrādaṁ prahrādam eva ca
hrādam
Hlāda
prahrādam
Prahlāda
eva
also
ca
and
tat-svasā siṁhikā nāma
tat-svasā
his sister
siṁhikā
Siṁhikā
nāma
named
rāhuṁ vipracito ’grahīt
rāhum
Rāhu
vipracitaḥ
from Vipracit
agrahīt
received.
The wife of Hiraṇyakaśipu was known as Kayādhu. She was the daughter of Jambha and a descendant of Danu. She gave birth to four consecutive sons, known as Saṁhlāda, Anuhlāda, Hlāda and Prahlāda. The sister of these four sons was known as Siṁhikā. She married the demon named Vipracit and gave birth to another demon, named Rāhu.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wife of Hiraṇyakaśipu known as Kayādhu, the daughter of Jambha and a descendant of Danu, gave birth to four consecutive sons, known as Saṁhlāda, Anuhlāda, Hlāda and Prahlāda, and a sister known as Siṁhikā. Siṁhikā married the demon named Vipracit and gave birth to Rāhu. From Vipracit Siṁhikā obtained Rahu as her son.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.14

↗
శిరోఽహరద్యస్య హరిశ్చక్రేణ పిబతోఽమృతమ్ । సంహ్రాదస్య కృతిర్భార్యాసూత పఞ్చజనం తత: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
śiro ’harad yasya hariś
[shiro ’harad yasya harish]
cakreṇa pibato ’mṛtam
[chakrena pibato ’mritam]
saṁhrādasya kṛtir bhāryā-
[samhraadasya kritir bhaaryaa-]
sūta paṣcajanaṁ tataḥ
[soota pashchajanam tatah]
śiraḥ — the head aharat — cut off yasya — of whom hariḥ — Hari cakreṇa — with the disc pibataḥ — drinking amṛtam — nectar saṁhrādasya — of Saṁhlāda kṛtiḥ — Kṛti bhāryā — the wife asūta — gave birth to paṣcajanam — Paṣcajana tataḥ — from him.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śiro ’harad yasya hariś
śiraḥ
the head
aharat
cut off
cakreṇa pibato ’mṛtam
saṁhrādasya kṛtir bhāryā-
yasya
of whom
hariḥ
Hari
sūta paṣcajanaṁ tataḥ
cakreṇa
with the disc
pibataḥ
drinking
amṛtam
nectar
saṁhrādasya
of Saṁhlāda
kṛtiḥ
Kṛti
bhāryā
the wife
asūta
gave birth to
paṣcajanam
Paṣcajana
tataḥ
from him.
While Rāhu, in disguise, was drinking nectar among the demigods, the Supreme Personality of Godhead severed his head. The wife of Saṁhlāda was named Kṛti. By union with Saṁhlāda, Kṛti gave birth to a son named Paṣcajana.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Rāhu drank nectar among the devatās, the Supreme Lord severed his head. The wife of Saṁhlāda was named Kṛti. By union with Saṁhlāda, Kṛti gave birth to a son named Paṣcajana.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.15

↗
హ్రాదస్య ధమనిర్భార్యాసూత వాతాపిమిల్వలమ్ । యోఽగస్త్యాయ త్వతిథయే పేచే వాతాపిమిల్వల: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
hrādasya dhamanir bhāryā-
[hraadasya dhamanir bhaaryaa-]
sūta vātāpim ilvalam
[soota vaataapim ilvalam]
yo ’gastyāya tv atithaye
[yo ’gastyaaya tv atithaye]
pece vātāpim ilvalaḥ
[peche vaataapim ilvalah]
hrādasya — of Hlāda dhamaniḥ — Dhamani bhāryā — the wife asūta — gave birth to vātāpim — Vātāpi ilvalam — Ilvala yaḥ — he who agastyāya — to Agastya tu — but atithaye — his guest pece — cooked vātāpim — Vātāpi ilvalaḥ — Ilvala.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hrādasya dhamanir bhāryā-
hrādasya
of Hlāda
dhamaniḥ
Dhamani
bhāryā
the wife
sūta vātāpim ilvalam
yo ’gastyāya tv atithaye
asūta
gave birth to
vātāpim
Vātāpi
pece vātāpim ilvalaḥ
ilvalam
Ilvala
yaḥ
he who
agastyāya
to Agastya
tu
but
atithaye
his guest
pece
cooked
vātāpim
Vātāpi
ilvalaḥ
Ilvala.
The wife of Hlāda was named Dhamani. She gave birth to two sons, named Vātāpi and Ilvala. When Agastya Muni became Ilvala’s guest, Ilvala served him a feast by cooking Vātāpi, who was in the shape of a ram.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wife of Hlāda, Dhamani, gave birth to two sons, named Vātāpi and Ilvala. When Agastya became Ilvala's guest, Ilvala served him a feast by cooking Vātāpi, who was in the shape of a ram. Ilvala cooked his brother Vātāpi in the form of a ram and served him to Agastya.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.16

↗
అనుహ్రాదస్య సూర్యాయాం బాష్కలో మహిషస్తథా । విరోచనస్తు ప్రాహ్రాదిర్దేవ్యాం తస్యాభవద్బ‍‌లి: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
anuhrādasya sūryāyāṁ
[anuhraadasya sooryaayaam]
bāṣkalo mahiṣas tathā
[baashkalo mahishas tathaa]
virocanas tu prāhrādir
[virochanas tu praahraadir]
devyāṁ tasyābhavad baliḥ
[devyaam tasyaabhavad balih]
anuhrādasya — of Anuhlāda sūryāyām — through Sūryā bāṣkalaḥ — Bāṣkala mahiṣaḥ — Mahiṣa tathā — also virocanaḥ — Virocana tu — indeed prāhrādiḥ — the son of Prahlāda devyām — through his wife tasya — of him abhavat — was baliḥ — Bali.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anuhrādasya sūryāyāṁ
anuhrādasya
of Anuhlāda
sūryāyām
through Sūryā
bāṣkalo mahiṣas tathā
bāṣkalaḥ
Bāṣkala
mahiṣaḥ
Mahiṣa
tathā
also
virocanas tu prāhrādir
virocanaḥ
Virocana
tu
indeed
prāhrādiḥ
the son of Prahlāda
devyāṁ tasyābhavad baliḥ
devyām
through his wife
tasya
of him
abhavat
was
baliḥ
Bali.
The wife of Anuhlāda was named Sūryā. She gave birth to two sons, named Bāṣkala and Mahiṣa. Prahlāda had one son, Virocana, whose wife gave birth to Bali Mahārāja.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wife of Anuhlāda named Sūryā gave birth to two sons, named Bāṣkala and Mahiṣa. Prahlāda had one son, Virocana, whose wife gave birth to Bali Mahārāja.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.17

↗
బాణజ్యేష్ఠం పుత్రశతమశనాయాం తతోఽభవత్ । తస్యానుభావం సుశ్లోక్యం పశ్చాదేవాభిధాస్యతే ॥ ౧౭ ॥
bāṇa-jyeṣṭhaṁ putra-śatam
[baana-jyeshtham putra-shatam]
aśanāyāṁ tato ’bhavat
[ashanaayaam tato ’bhavat]
tasyānubhāvaṁ suślokyaṁ
[tasyaanubhaavam sushlokyam]
paścād evābhidhāsyate
[pashchaad evaabhidhaasyate]
bāṇa-jyeṣṭham — having Bāṇa as the eldest putra-śatam — one hundred sons aśanāyām — through Aśanā tataḥ — from him abhavat — there were tasya — his anubhāvam — character su-ślokyam — laudable paścāt — later eva — certainly abhidhāsyate — will be described.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bāṇa-jyeṣṭhaṁ putra-śatam
bāṇa-jyeṣṭham
having Bāṇa as the eldest
putra-śatam
one hundred sons
aśanāyām
through Aśanā
tataḥ
from him
aśanāyāṁ tato ’bhavat
tasyānubhāvaṁ suślokyaṁ
paścād evābhidhāsyate
abhavat
there were
tasya
his
anubhāvam
character
su-ślokyam
laudable
paścāt
later
eva
certainly
abhidhāsyate
will be described.
Thereafter, Bali Mahārāja begot one hundred sons in the womb of Aśanā. Of these one hundred sons, King Bāṇa was the eldest. The activities of Bali Mahārāja, which are very laudable, will be described later [in the Eighth Canto].
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, Bali Mahārāja begot one hundred sons in the womb of Aśanā, of whom Bāṇa was the eldest. The activities of Bali Mahārāja, which are very laudable, will be described later [in the Eighth Canto]. Neuter gender of anubhāvam is poetic license. Or it can indicate an external perspective on his actions.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.18

↗
బాణ ఆరాధ్య గిరిశం లేభే తద్గణముఖ్యతామ్ । యత్పార్శ్వే భగవానాస్తే హ్యద్యాపి పురపాలక: ॥ ౧౮ ॥
bāṇa ārādhya giriśaṁ
[baana aaraadhya girisham]
lebhe tad-gaṇa-mukhyatām
[lebhe tad-gana-mukhyataam]
yat-pārśve bhagavān āste
[yat-paarshve bhagavaan aaste]
hy adyāpi pura-pālakaḥ
[hy adyaapi pura-paalakah]
bāṇaḥ — Bāṇa ārādhya — having worshiped giriśam — Lord Śiva lebhe — obtained tat — of him (Lord Śiva) gaṇa-mukhyatām — the platform of being one of the chief associates yat-pārśve — beside whom bhagavān — Lord Śiva āste — remains hi — because of which adya — now api — even pura-pālakaḥ — the protector of the capital.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bāṇa ārādhya giriśaṁ
bāṇaḥ
Bāṇa
ārādhya
having worshiped
giriśam
Lord Śiva
lebhe tad-gaṇa-mukhyatām
lebhe
obtained
tat
of him (Lord Śiva)
gaṇa-mukhyatām
the platform of being one of the chief associates
yat-pārśve
beside whom
yat-pārśve bhagavān āste
bhagavān
Lord Śiva
āste
remains
hi
because of which
hy adyāpi pura-pālakaḥ
adya
now
api
even
pura-pālakaḥ
the protector of the capital.
Since King Bāṇa was a great worshiper of Lord Śiva, he became one of Lord Śiva’s most celebrated associates. Even now, Lord Śiva protects King Bāṇa’s capital and always stands beside him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Since King Bāṇa was a great worshiper of Lord Śiva, he became one of Lord Śiva's most celebrated associates. Even now, Lord Śiva, standing by his side, protects King Bāṇa's capital.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.19

↗
మరుతశ్చ దితే: పుత్రాశ్చత్వారింశన్నవాధికా: । త ఆసన్నప్రజా: సర్వే నీతా ఇన్ద్రేణ సాత్మతామ్ ॥ ౧౯ ॥
marutaś ca diteḥ putrāś
[marutash cha diteh putraash]
catvāriṁśan navādhikāḥ
[chatvaarimshan navaadhikaah]
ta āsann aprajāḥ sarve
[ta aasann aprajaah sarve]
nītā indreṇa sātmatām
[neetaa indrena saatmataam]
marutaḥ — the Maruts ca — and diteḥ — of Diti putrāḥ — sons catvāriṁśat — forty nava-adhikāḥ — plus nine te — they āsan — were aprajāḥ — without sons sarve — all nītāḥ — were brought indreṇa — by Indra sa-ātmatām — to the position of demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
marutaś ca diteḥ putrāś
marutaḥ
the Maruts
ca
and
diteḥ
of Diti
putrāḥ
sons
catvāriṁśan navādhikāḥ
catvāriṁśat
forty
nava-adhikāḥ
plus nine
te
they
ta āsann aprajāḥ sarve
āsan
were
aprajāḥ
without sons
sarve
all
nītā indreṇa sātmatām
nītāḥ
were brought
indreṇa
by Indra
sa-ātmatām
to the position of demigods.
The forty-nine Marut demigods were also born from the womb of Diti. None of them had sons. Although they were born of Diti, King Indra gave them a position as demigods.

Apparently even demons can be elevated to positions as demigods when their atheistic character is reformed. There are two kinds of men throughout the universe. Those who are devotees of Lord Viṣṇu are called demigods, and those who are just the opposite are called demons. Even the demons can be transformed into demigods, as the statement of this verse proves.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The forty-nine Maruts, also born from the womb of Diti, did not have sons. Although they were born of Diti, King Indra gave them a position as devatās. Sātmatām means that they attained the position of devatās, worshipped just like Indra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.20

↗
శ్రీరాజోవాచ కథం త ఆసురం భావమపోహ్యౌత్పత్తికం గురో । ఇన్ద్రేణ ప్రాపితా: సాత్మ్యం కిం తత్సాధు కృతం హి తై: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
śrī-rājovāca
[shree-raajovaacha]
kathaṁ ta āsuraṁ bhāvam
[katham ta aasuram bhaavam]
apohyautpattikaṁ guro
[apohyautpattikam guro]
indreṇa prāpitāḥ sātmyaṁ
[indrena praapitaah saatmyam]
kiṁ tat sādhu kṛtaṁ hi taiḥ
[kim tat saadhu kritam hi taih]
śrī-rājā uvāca — King Parīkṣit said katham — why te — they āsuram — demoniac bhāvam — mentality apohya — giving up autpattikam — due to birth guro — my dear lord indreṇa — by Indra prāpitāḥ — were converted sa-ātmyam — to demigods kim — whether tat — therefore sādhu — pious activities kṛtam — performed hi — indeed taiḥ — by them.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rājovāca
śrī-rājā uvāca
King Parīkṣit said
kathaṁ ta āsuraṁ bhāvam
katham
why
te
they
āsuram
demoniac
bhāvam
mentality
apohyautpattikaṁ guro
apohya
giving up
autpattikam
due to birth
guro
my dear lord
indreṇa prāpitāḥ sātmyaṁ
indreṇa
by Indra
prāpitāḥ
were converted
sa-ātmyam
to demigods
kiṁ tat sādhu kṛtaṁ hi taiḥ
kim
whether
tat
therefore
sādhu
pious activities
kṛtam
performed
hi
indeed
taiḥ
by them.
King Parīkṣit inquired: My dear lord, due to their birth, the forty-nine Maruts must have been obsessed with a demoniac mentality. Why did Indra, the King of heaven, convert them into demigods? Did they perform any rituals or pious activities?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Parīkṣit said: O guru! Why did Indra convert person born with demonic mentality into devatās? Did they perform any pious activities?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.21

↗
ఇమే శ్రద్దధతే బ్రహ్మన్నృషయో హి మయా సహ । పరిజ్ఞానాయ భగవంస్తన్నో వ్యాఖ్యాతుమర్హసి ॥ ౨౧ ॥
ime śraddadhate brahmann
[ime shraddadhate brahmann]
ṛṣayo hi mayā saha
[rishayo hi mayaa saha]
parijṣānāya bhagavaṁs
[parijshaanaaya bhagavams]
tan no vyākhyātum arhasi
[tan no vyaakhyaatum arhasi]
ime — these śraddadhate — are eager brahman — O brāhmaṇa ṛṣayaḥ — sages hi — indeed mayā saha — with me parijṣānāya — to know bhagavan — O great soul tat — therefore naḥ — to us vyākhyātum arhasi — please explain.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ime śraddadhate brahmann
ime
these
śraddadhate
are eager
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
ṛṣayo hi mayā saha
ṛṣayaḥ
sages
hi
indeed
mayā saha
with me
parijṣānāya bhagavaṁs
parijṣānāya
to know
bhagavan
O great soul
tan no vyākhyātum arhasi
tat
therefore
naḥ
to us
vyākhyātum arhasi
please explain.
My dear brāhmaṇa, I and all the sages present with me are eager to know about this. Therefore, O great soul, kindly explain to us the reason.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear brāhmaṇa! All the sages present along with me are eager to know about this. Therefore, O great soul, kindly explain to us the reason. Parīkṣit puts his faith in the sages. They have faith that you will make known to them the secret reason.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.22

↗
శ్రీసూత ఉవాచ తద్విష్ణురాతస్య స బాదరాయణి- ర్వచో నిశమ్యాద‍ృతమల్పమర్థవత్ । సభాజయన్ సన్నిభృతేన చేతసా జగాద సత్రాయణ సర్వదర్శన: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
śrī-sūta uvāca
[shree-soota uvaacha]
tad viṣṇurātasya sa bādarāyaṇir
[tad vishnuraatasya sa baadaraayanir]
vaco niśamyādṛtam alpam arthavat
[vacho nishamyaadritam alpam arthavat]
sabhājayan san nibhṛtena cetasā
[sabhaajayan san nibhritena chetasaa]
jagāda satrāyaṇa sarva-darśanaḥ
[jagaada satraayana sarva-darshanah]
śrī-sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said tat — those viṣṇurātasya — of Mahārāja Parīkṣit saḥ — he bādarāyaṇiḥ — Śukadeva Gosvāmī vacaḥ — words niśamya — hearing ādṛtam — respectful alpam — brief artha-vat — meaningful sabhājayan san — praising nibhṛtena cetasā — with great pleasure jagāda — replied satrāyaṇa — O Śaunaka sarva-darśanaḥ — who is aware of everything.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-sūta uvāca
śrī-sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
tat
those
tad viṣṇurātasya sa bādarāyaṇir
viṣṇurātasya
of Mahārāja Parīkṣit
saḥ
he
bādarāyaṇiḥ
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
vaco niśamyādṛtam alpam arthavat
vacaḥ
words
niśamya
hearing
ādṛtam
respectful
alpam
brief
artha-vat
meaningful
sabhājayan san nibhṛtena cetasā
sabhājayan san
praising
nibhṛtena cetasā
with great pleasure
jagāda satrāyaṇa sarva-darśanaḥ
jagāda
replied
satrāyaṇa
O Śaunaka
sarva-darśanaḥ
who is aware of everything.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: O great sage Śaunaka, after hearing Mahārāja Parīkṣit speak respectfully and briefly on topics essential to hear, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, who was well aware of everything, praised his endeavor with great pleasure and replied.

Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s question was very much appreciated by Śukadeva Gosvāmī because although it was composed of a small number of words, it contained meaningful inquiries about how the sons of Diti, although born as demons, became demigods. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura stresses that even though Diti was very envious, her heart was purified because of a devotional attitude. Another significant topic is that although Kaśyapa Muni was a learned scholar and was advanced in spiritual consciousness, he nonetheless fell a victim to the inducement of his beautiful wife. All these questions were posed in a small number of words, and therefore Śukadeva Gosvāmī very much appreciated Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s inquiry.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta Gosvāmī said: O sage Śaunaka! After hearing Mahārāja Parīkṣit speak respectful, precise words holding many meanings, omniscient Śukadeva Gosvāmī praised him and, with perfectly concentrated mind, replied. Arthavat means “with many meanings.” One meaning is obtained from the story. Performing tamasic bhakti to the Lord with the goal of harming others, one becomes purified in heart, and along with developing bhakti without tamas, one gains liberation from saṁsāra and gives up the tendency for violence to others. Diti is the proof of this. That is the first meaning of the story. Those with crooked hearts, who see faults in others, though they are intelligent, do not see those same faults in themselves. Diti is also an example of this, with her words starting in verse 24. This is the second meaning. A learned person can be cheated by the attraction of a woman. Kaśyapa is an example of this. That is the third meaning. Alpam means “with measured syllables.” Sannibhṛtena means “completely concentrated mind.” Satrāyaṇa is Śaunaka.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.23

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ హతపుత్రా దితి: శక్రపార్ష్ణిగ్రాహేణ విష్ణునా । మన్యునా శోకదీప్తేన జ్వలన్తీ పర్యచిన్తయత్ ॥ ౨౩ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
hata-putrā ditiḥ śakra-
[hata-putraa ditih shakra-]
pārṣṇi-grāheṇa viṣṇunā
[paarshni-graahena vishnunaa]
manyunā śoka-dīptena
[manyunaa shoka-deeptena]
jvalantī paryacintayat
[jvalantee paryachintayat]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said hata-putrā — whose sons were killed ditiḥ — Diti śakra-pārṣṇi-grāheṇa — who was helping Lord Indra viṣṇunā — by Lord Viṣṇu manyunā — with anger śoka-dīptena — kindled by lamentation jvalantī — burning paryacintayat — thought.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
hata-putrā ditiḥ śakra-
hata-putrā
whose sons were killed
ditiḥ
Diti
śakra-pārṣṇi-grāheṇa
who was helping Lord Indra
pārṣṇi-grāheṇa viṣṇunā
viṣṇunā
by Lord Viṣṇu
manyunā śoka-dīptena
manyunā
with anger
śoka-dīptena
kindled by lamentation
jvalantī paryacintayat
jvalantī
burning
paryacintayat
thought.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Just to help Indra, Lord Viṣṇu killed the two brothers Hiraṇyākṣa and Hiraṇyakaśipu. Because of their being killed, their mother, Diti, overwhelmed with lamentation and anger, contemplated as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Diti, whose two sons Hiraṇyākṣa and Hiraṇyakaśipu had been killed by Viṣṇu with Indra’s help, burning with anger intensified by lamentation, contemplated as follows. Śakra-pārṣṇi-grahena means “with Indra helping from the back, or supporting indirectly.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.24

↗
కదా ను భ్రాతృహన్తారమిన్ద్రియారామముల్బణమ్ । అక్లిన్నహృదయం పాపం ఘాతయిత్వా శయే సుఖమ్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
kadā nu bhrātṛ-hantāram
[kadaa nu bhraatri-hantaaram]
indriyārāmam ulbaṇam
[indriyaaraamam ulbanam]
aklinna-hṛdayaṁ pāpaṁ
[aklinna-hridayam paapam]
ghātayitvā śaye sukham
[ghaatayitvaa shaye sukham]
kadā — when nu — indeed bhrātṛ-hantāram — the killer of the brothers indriya-ārāmam — very fond of sense gratification ulbaṇam — cruel aklinna-hṛdayam — hard hearted pāpam — sinful ghātayitvā — having caused to be killed śaye — shall I rest sukham — happily.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kadā nu bhrātṛ-hantāram
kadā
when
nu
indeed
bhrātṛ-hantāram
the killer of the brothers
indriyārāmam ulbaṇam
indriya-ārāmam
very fond of sense gratification
ulbaṇam
cruel
aklinna-hṛdayaṁ pāpaṁ
aklinna-hṛdayam
hard hearted
pāpam
sinful
ghātayitvā śaye sukham
ghātayitvā
having caused to be killed
śaye
shall I rest
sukham
happily.
Lord Indra, who is very much fond of sense gratification, has killed the two brothers Hiraṇyākṣa and Hiraṇyakaśipu by means of Lord Viṣṇu. Therefore Indra is cruel, hardhearted and sinful. When will I, having killed him, rest with a pacified mind?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I will rest in peace after having killed the sinful, cruel, heard-hearted Indra, a sense enjoyer, and a killer of two brothers. Ulbanam means cruel. Sukham śaye means “I sleep peacefully.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.25

↗
కృమివిడ్భస్మసంజ్ఞాసీద్యస్యేశాభిహితస్య చ । భూతధ్రుక్ తత్కృతే స్వార్థం కిం వేద నిరయో యత: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
kṛmi-viḍ-bhasma-saṁjṣāsīd
[krimi-vid-bhasma-samjshaaseed]
yasyeśābhihitasya ca
[yasyeshaabhihitasya cha]
bhūta-dhruk tat-kṛte svārthaṁ
[bhoota-dhruk tat-krite svaartham]
kiṁ veda nirayo yataḥ
[kim veda nirayo yatah]
kṛmi — worms viṭ — stool bhasma — ashes saṁjṣā — name āsīt — becomes yasya — of which (body) īśa-abhihitasya — although designated as king ca — also bhūta-dhruk — he who harms others tat-kṛte — for the sake of that sva-artham — his self-interest kim veda — does he know nirayaḥ — punishment in hell yataḥ — from which.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛmi-viḍ-bhasma-saṁjṣāsīd
kṛmi
worms
viṭ
stool
bhasma
ashes
saṁjṣā
name
āsīt
becomes
yasyeśābhihitasya ca
yasya
of which (body)
īśa-abhihitasya
although designated as king
ca
also
bhūta-dhruk tat-kṛte svārthaṁ
bhūta-dhruk
he who harms others
tat-kṛte
for the sake of that
sva-artham
his self-interest
kiṁ veda nirayo yataḥ
kim veda
does he know
nirayaḥ
punishment in hell
yataḥ
from which.
When dead, the bodies of all the rulers known as kings and great leaders will be transformed into worms, stool or ashes. If one enviously kills others for the protection of such a body, does he actually know the true interest of life? Certainly he does not, for if one is envious of other entities, he surely goes to hell.

The material body, even if possessed by a great king, is ultimately transformed into stool, worms or ashes. When one is too attached to the bodily conception of life, he is certainly not very intelligent.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
For maintaining his body which has been defined as worms, stool and ashes, the king, in committing violence, does not know his own benefit, since he will go to hell as a result. After death the body of he who is called a king, if remaining for two or three days becomes worms. If eaten by dogs, it becomes stool. If it is burned by sons, it becomes ashes. That has been the definition of the body of a king, since this has been seen from examples of previous kings. Past tense is used. Does one who commits violence to other beings, for maintaining his body, know his own benefit? He does not, because he goes to hell. This implies that Indra is without intelligence. She also is without intelligence because she wants to kill Indra. One can see that both she and Indra commit violence, both are hard-hearted, and both do not know their own benefit. In this way a person with real intelligence can determine the lack of discernment of unintelligent people.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.26

↗
ఆశాసానస్య తస్యేదం ధ్రువమున్నద్ధచేతస: । మదశోషక ఇన్ద్రస్య భూయాద్యేన సుతో హి మే ॥ ౨౬ ॥
āśāsānasya tasyedaṁ
[aashaasaanasya tasyedam]
dhruvam unnaddha-cetasaḥ
[dhruvam unnaddha-chetasah]
mada-śoṣaka indrasya
[mada-shoshaka indrasya]
bhūyād yena suto hi me
[bhooyaad yena suto hi me]
āśāsānasya — thinking tasya — of him idam — this (body) dhruvam — eternal unnaddha-cetasaḥ — whose mind is unrestrained mada-śoṣakaḥ — who can remove the madness indrasya — of Indra bhūyāt — may there be yena — by which sutaḥ — a son hi — certainly me — of me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āśāsānasya tasyedaṁ
āśāsānasya
thinking
tasya
of him
idam
this (body)
dhruvam unnaddha-cetasaḥ
dhruvam
eternal
unnaddha-cetasaḥ
whose mind is unrestrained
mada-śoṣaka indrasya
mada-śoṣakaḥ
who can remove the madness
indrasya
of Indra
bhūyād yena suto hi me
bhūyāt
may there be
yena
by which
sutaḥ
a son
hi
certainly
me
of me.
Diti thought: Indra considers his body eternal, and thus he has become unrestrained. I therefore wish to have a son who can remove Indra’s madness. Let me adopt some means to help me in this.

One who is in the bodily conception of life is compared in the śāstras to animals like cows and asses. Diti wanted to punish Indra, who had become like a lower animal.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of his evil actions, may I have a son who can destroy the pride of uncontrolled Indra, who thinks he is eternal! May I have a son to destroy Indra’s pride, because of his evil actions (yena)! This is my prayer. Indra thinks his body is eternal, and has an uncurbed mind.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.27-28

↗
ఇతి భావేన సా భర్తురాచచారాసకృత్ప్రియమ్ । శుశ్రూషయానురాగేణ ప్రశ్రయేణ దమేన చ ॥ ౨౭ ॥ భక్త్యా పరమయా రాజన్ మనోజ్ఞైర్వల్గుభాషితై: । మనో జగ్రాహ భావజ్ఞా సస్మితాపాఙ్గవీక్షణై: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
iti bhāvena sā bhartur
[iti bhaavena saa bhartur]
ācacārāsakṛt priyam
[aachachaaraasakrit priyam]
śuśrūṣayānurāgeṇa
[shushrooshayaanuraagena]
praśrayeṇa damena ca
[prashrayena damena cha]
bhaktyā paramayā rājan
[bhaktyaa paramayaa raajan]
manojṣair valgu-bhāṣitaiḥ
[manojshair valgu-bhaashitaih]
mano jagrāha bhāva-jṣā
[mano jagraaha bhaava-jshaa]
sasmitāpāṅga-vīkṣaṇaiḥ
[sasmitaapaanga-veekshanaih]
iti — thus bhāvena — with the intention sā — she bhartuḥ — of the husband ācacāra — performed asakṛt — constantly priyam — pleasing activities śuśrūṣayā — with service anurāgeṇa — with love praśrayeṇa — with humility damena — with self-control ca — also bhaktyā — with devotion paramayā — great rājan — O King manojṣaiḥ — charming valgu-bhāṣitaiḥ — with sweet words manaḥ — his mind jagrāha — brought under her control bhāva-jṣā — knowing his nature sa-smita — with smiling apāṅga-vīkṣaṇaiḥ — by glancing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti bhāvena sā bhartur
iti
thus
bhāvena
with the intention
sā
she
bhartuḥ
of the husband
ācacārāsakṛt priyam
ācacāra
performed
asakṛt
constantly
priyam
pleasing activities
śuśrūṣayānurāgeṇa
śuśrūṣayā
with service
anurāgeṇa
with love
praśrayeṇa damena ca
praśrayeṇa
with humility
damena
with self-control
ca
also
bhaktyā paramayā rājan
bhaktyā
with devotion
paramayā
great
rājan
O King
manojṣair valgu-bhāṣitaiḥ
manojṣaiḥ
charming
valgu-bhāṣitaiḥ
with sweet words
mano jagrāha bhāva-jṣā
manaḥ
his mind
jagrāha
brought under her control
bhāva-jṣā
knowing his nature
sa-smita
with smiling
sasmitāpāṅga-vīkṣaṇaiḥ
apāṅga-vīkṣaṇaiḥ
by glancing.
Thinking in this way [with a desire for a son to kill Indra], Diti began constantly acting to satisfy Kaśyapa by her pleasing behavior. O King, Diti always carried out Kaśyapa’s orders very faithfully, as he desired. With service, love, humility and control, with words spoken very sweetly to satisfy her husband, and with smiles and glances at him, Diti attracted his mind and brought it under her control.

When a woman wants to endear herself to her husband and make him very faithful, she must try to please him in all respects. When the husband is pleased with his wife, the wife can receive all necessities, ornaments and full satisfaction for her senses. Herein this is indicated by the behavior of Diti.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thinking in this way, Diti began constantly acting to satisfy Kaśyapa. Knowing his mind, she gained control of his mind with her great devotion, self-control, humility, with affectionate service, sweet, charming words and glances. When a woman satisfies her husband, her desires are fulfilled. Therefore I will satisfy my husband by service. This was her thought.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.29

↗
ఏవం స్త్రియా జడీభూతో విద్వానపి మనోజ్ఞయా । బాఢమిత్యాహ వివశో న తచ్చిత్రం హి యోషితి ॥ ౨౯ ॥
evaṁ striyā jaḍībhūto
[evam striyaa jadeebhooto]
vidvān api manojṣayā
[vidvaan api manojshayaa]
bāḍham ity āha vivaśo
[baadham ity aaha vivasho]
na tac citraṁ hi yoṣiti
[na tach chitram hi yoshiti]
evam — thus striyā — by the woman jaḍībhūtaḥ — enchanted vidvān — very learned api — although manojṣayā — very expert bāḍham — yes iti — thus āha — said vivaśaḥ — under her control na — not tat — that citram — astonishing hi — indeed yoṣiti — in the matter of women.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ striyā jaḍībhūto
evam
thus
striyā
by the woman
jaḍībhūtaḥ
enchanted
vidvān api manojṣayā
vidvān
very learned
api
although
manojṣayā
very expert
bāḍham ity āha vivaśo
bāḍham
yes
iti
thus
āha
said
vivaśaḥ
under her control
na tac citraṁ hi yoṣiti
na
not
tat
that
citram
astonishing
hi
indeed
yoṣiti
in the matter of women.
Although Kaśyapa Muni was a learned scholar, he was captivated by Diti’s artificial behavior, which brought him under her control. Therefore he assured his wife that he would fulfill her desires. Such a promise by a husband is not at all astonishing.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though learned, Kaśyapa was bewildered by his attractive wife. He helplessly agreed to satisfy her. That was not an astonishing behavior towards his wife. He said, “Yes, I will satisfy your desire.” That is not astonishing.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.30

↗
విలోక్యైకాన్తభూతాని భూతాన్యాదౌ ప్రజాపతి: । స్త్రియం చక్రే స్వదేహార్ధం యయా పుంసాం మతిర్హృతా ॥ ౩౦ ॥
vilokyaikānta-bhūtāni
[vilokyaikaanta-bhootaani]
bhūtāny ādau prajāpatiḥ
[bhootaany aadau prajaapatih]
striyaṁ cakre sva-dehārdhaṁ
[striyam chakre sva-dehaardham]
yayā puṁsāṁ matir hṛtā
[yayaa pumsaam matir hritaa]
vilokya — seeing ekānta-bhūtāni — detached bhūtāni — the living entities ādau — in the beginning prajāpatiḥ — Lord Brahmā striyam — the woman cakre — created sva-deha — of his body ardham — half yayā — by whom puṁsām — of men matiḥ — the mind hṛtā — carried away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vilokyaikānta-bhūtāni
vilokya
seeing
ekānta-bhūtāni
detached
bhūtāni
the living entities
bhūtāny ādau prajāpatiḥ
ādau
in the beginning
prajāpatiḥ
Lord Brahmā
striyaṁ cakre sva-dehārdhaṁ
striyam
the woman
cakre
created
sva-deha
of his body
ardham
half
yayā puṁsāṁ matir hṛtā
yayā
by whom
puṁsām
of men
matiḥ
the mind
hṛtā
carried away.
In the beginning of creation, Lord Brahmā, the father of the living entities of the universe, saw that all the living entities were unattached. To increase population, he then created woman from the better half of man’s body, for woman’s behavior carries away a man’s mind.

This entire universe is going on under the spell of sexual attachment, which was created by Lord Brahmā to increase the population of the entire universe, not only in human society but also in other species. As stated by Ṛṣabhadeva in the Fifth Canto, puṁsaḥ striyā mithunī-bhāvam etam: the entire world is going on under the spell of sexual attraction and desire between man and woman. When man and woman unite, the hard knot of this attraction becomes increasingly tight, and thus a man is implicated in the materialistic way of life. This is the illusion of the material world. This illusion acted upon Kaśyapa Muni, although he was very learned and advanced in spiritual knowledge. As stated in the Manu-saṁhitā (2.215) and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (9.19.17) :

mātrā svasrā duhitrā vā nāviviktāsano bhavet balavān indriya-grāmo vidvāṁsam api karṣati

“A man should not associate with a woman in a solitary place, not even with his mother, sister or daughter, for the senses are so strong that they lead astray even a person advanced in knowledge.” When a man remains in a solitary place with a woman, his sexual desires undoubtedly increase. Therefore the words ekānta-bhūtāni, which are used here, indicate that to avoid sexual desires one should avoid the company of women as far as possible. Sexual desire is so powerful that one is saturated with it if he stays in a solitary place with any woman, even his mother, sister or daughter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the beginning of creation, Lord Brahmā, seeing that all the living entities were single, created woman from the better half of man's body, by whom the men’s minds are captivated. Ekānta-bhūtāni means the men were without association. By woman, men’s minds became captivated. They entered the continuous river of saṁsāra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.31

↗
ఏవం శుశ్రూషితస్తాత భగవాన్ కశ్యప: స్త్రియా । ప్రహస్య పరమప్రీతో దితిమాహాభినన్ద్య చ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
evaṁ śuśrūṣitas tāta
[evam shushrooshitas taata]
bhagavān kaśyapaḥ striyā
[bhagavaan kashyapah striyaa]
prahasya parama-prīto
[prahasya parama-preeto]
ditim āhābhinandya ca
[ditim aahaabhinandya cha]
evam — thus śuśrūṣitaḥ — being served tāta — O dear one bhagavān — the powerful kaśyapaḥ — Kaśyapa striyā — by the woman prahasya — smiling parama-prītaḥ — being very pleased ditim — to Diti āha — said abhinandya — approving ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ śuśrūṣitas tāta
evam
thus
śuśrūṣitaḥ
being served
tāta
O dear one
bhagavān kaśyapaḥ striyā
bhagavān
the powerful
kaśyapaḥ
Kaśyapa
striyā
by the woman
prahasya parama-prīto
prahasya
smiling
parama-prītaḥ
being very pleased
ditim āhābhinandya ca
ditim
to Diti
āha
said
abhinandya
approving
ca
also.
O my dear one, the most powerful sage Kaśyapa, being extremely pleased by the mild behavior of his wife Diti, smiled and spoke to her as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O dear one! Powerful Kaśyapa, being extremely pleased after being served by his wife, smiled, and, welcoming her, spoke as follows.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.32

↗
శ్రీకశ్యప ఉవాచ వరం వరయ వామోరు ప్రీతస్తేఽహమనిన్దితే । స్త్రియా భర్తరి సుప్రీతే క: కామ ఇహ చాగమ: ॥ ౩౨ ॥
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
[shree-kashyapa uvaacha]
varaṁ varaya vāmoru
[varam varaya vaamoru]
prītas te ’ham anindite
[preetas te ’ham anindite]
striyā bhartari suprīte
[striyaa bhartari supreete]
kaḥ kāma iha cāgamaḥ
[kah kaama iha chaagamah]
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca — Kaśyapa Muni said varam — benediction varaya — ask vāmoru — O beautiful woman prītaḥ — pleased te — with you aham — I anindite — O irreproachable lady striyāḥ — for the woman bhartari — when the husband su-prīte — pleased kaḥ — what kāmaḥ — desire iha — here ca — and agamaḥ — difficult to obtain.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca
Kaśyapa Muni said
varam
benediction
varaṁ varaya vāmoru
varaya
ask
vāmoru
O beautiful woman
prītas te ’ham anindite
prītaḥ
pleased
te
with you
striyā bhartari suprīte
kaḥ kāma iha cāgamaḥ
aham
I
anindite
O irreproachable lady
striyāḥ
for the woman
bhartari
when the husband
su-prīte
pleased
kaḥ
what
kāmaḥ
desire
iha
here
ca
and
agamaḥ
difficult to obtain.
Kaśyapa Muni said: O beautiful woman, O irreproachable lady, since I am very much pleased by your behavior, you may ask me for any benediction you want. If a husband is pleased, what desires are difficult for his wife to obtain, either in this world or in the next?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kaśyapa Muni said: O beautiful woman, O irreproachable lady! I am pleased by your behavior. Please ask me for any benediction. If a husband is pleased, what desires cannot be fulfilled, either in this world or in the next? Agamaḥ means unobtainable.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.33-34

↗
పతిరేవ హి నారీణాం దైవతం పరమం స్మృతమ్ । మానస: సర్వభూతానాం వాసుదేవ: శ్రియ: పతి: ॥ ౩౩ ॥ స ఏవ దేవతాలిఙ్గైర్నామరూపవికల్పితై: । ఇజ్యతే భగవాన్ పుమ్భి: స్త్రీభిశ్చ పతిరూపధృక్ ॥ ౩౪ ॥
patir eva hi nārīṇāṁ
[patir eva hi naareenaam]
daivataṁ paramaṁ smṛtam
[daivatam paramam smritam]
mānasaḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ
[maanasah sarva-bhootaanaam]
vāsudevaḥ śriyaḥ patiḥ
[vaasudevah shriyah patih]
sa eva devatā-liṅgair
[sa eva devataa-lingair]
nāma-rūpa-vikalpitaiḥ
[naama-roopa-vikalpitaih]
ijyate bhagavān pumbhiḥ
[ijyate bhagavaan pumbhih]
strībhiś ca pati-rūpa-dhṛk
[streebhish cha pati-roopa-dhrik]
patiḥ — the husband eva — indeed hi — certainly nārīṇām — of women daivatam — demigod paramam — supreme smṛtam — is considered mānasaḥ — situated in the heart sarva-bhūtānām — of all living entities vāsudevaḥ — Vāsudeva śriyaḥ — of the goddess of fortune patiḥ — the husband saḥ — He eva — certainly devatā-liṅgaiḥ — by the forms of the demigods nāma — names rūpa — forms vikalpitaiḥ — conceived ijyate — is worshiped bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead pumbhiḥ — by men strībhiḥ — by women ca — also pati-rūpa-dhṛk — in the form of the husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
patir eva hi nārīṇāṁ
patiḥ
the husband
eva
indeed
hi
certainly
nārīṇām
of women
daivataṁ paramaṁ smṛtam
daivatam
demigod
paramam
supreme
smṛtam
is considered
mānasaḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ
mānasaḥ
situated in the heart
sarva-bhūtānām
of all living entities
vāsudevaḥ śriyaḥ patiḥ
vāsudevaḥ
Vāsudeva
śriyaḥ
of the goddess of fortune
patiḥ
the husband
sa eva devatā-liṅgair
saḥ
He
eva
certainly
devatā-liṅgaiḥ
by the forms of the demigods
nāma-rūpa-vikalpitaiḥ
nāma
names
rūpa
forms
vikalpitaiḥ
conceived
ijyate bhagavān pumbhiḥ
ijyate
is worshiped
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
pumbhiḥ
by men
strībhiś ca pati-rūpa-dhṛk
strībhiḥ
by women
ca
also
pati-rūpa-dhṛk
in the form of the husband.
A husband is the supreme demigod for a woman. The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Vāsudeva, the husband of the goddess of fortune, is situated in everyone’s heart and is worshiped through the various names and forms of the demigods by fruitive workers. Similarly, a husband represents the Lord as the object of worship for a woman.

The Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (9.23) :

ye ’py anya-devatā-bhaktā yajante śraddhayānvitāḥ te ’pi mām eva kaunteya yajanty avidhi-pūrvakam

“Whatever a man may sacrifice to other gods, O son of Kuntī, is really meant for Me alone, but it is offered without true understanding.” The demigods are various assistants who act like the hands and legs of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. One who is not in direct touch with the Supreme Lord and cannot conceive of the exalted position of the Lord is sometimes advised to worship the demigods as various parts of the Lord. If women, who are usually very much attached to their husbands, worship their husbands as representatives of Vāsudeva, the women benefit, just as Ajāmila benefited by calling for Nārāyaṇa, his son. Ajāmila was concerned with his son, but because of his attachment to the name of Nārāyaṇa, he attained salvation simply by chanting that name. In India a husband is still called pati-guru, the husband spiritual master. If husband and wife are attached to one another for advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, their relationship of cooperation is very effective for such advancement. Although the names of Indra and Agni are sometimes uttered in the Vedic mantras ( indrāya svāhā, agnaye svāhā ), the Vedic sacrifices are actually performed for the satisfaction of Lord Viṣṇu. As long as one is very much attached to material sense gratification, the worship of the demigods or the worship of one’s husband is recommended.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A husband is the supreme object of worship for a woman. Vāsudeva, the husband of the goddess of fortune and presiding deity of citta within all beings, is worshiped through the various names and forms representing devatās by fruitive workers. Similarly, a husband, the representative of the Lord, is worshipped by a woman. The husband is a jīva. How can he be the Lord (daivatam)? The Supreme Lord Vāsudeva, who is the presiding deity of the citta (manasaḥ), is worshipped by karma-yogīs by indications of the devatās, such as names like Indra and forms like his form holding a thunderbolt, variously combined. Thus the Lord is addressed by various names and forms with words like “indrāya svāhā” and “agnaye svāhā.” Similarly the Lord in the form of a husband is worshipped by his wife.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.35

↗
తస్మాత్పతివ్రతా నార్య: శ్రేయస్కామా: సుమధ్యమే । యజన్తేఽనన్యభావేన పతిమాత్మానమీశ్వరమ్ ॥ ౩౫ ॥
tasmāt pati-vratā nāryaḥ
[tasmaat pati-vrataa naaryah]
śreyas-kāmāḥ sumadhyame
[shreyas-kaamaah sumadhyame]
yajante ’nanya-bhāvena
[yajante ’nanya-bhaavena]
patim ātmānam īśvaram
[patim aatmaanam eeshvaram]
tasmāt — therefore pati-vratāḥ — devoted to the husband nāryaḥ — women śreyaḥ-kāmāḥ — conscientious su-madhyame — O thin-waisted woman yajante — worship ananya-bhāvena — with devotion patim — the husband ātmānam — the Supersoul īśvaram — representative of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmāt pati-vratā nāryaḥ
tasmāt
therefore
pati-vratāḥ
devoted to the husband
nāryaḥ
women
śreyas-kāmāḥ sumadhyame
śreyaḥ-kāmāḥ
conscientious
su-madhyame
O thin-waisted woman
yajante
worship
yajante ’nanya-bhāvena
ananya-bhāvena
with devotion
patim ātmānam īśvaram
patim
the husband
ātmānam
the Supersoul
īśvaram
representative of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
My dear wife, whose body is so beautiful, your waist being thin, a conscientious wife should be chaste and should abide by the orders of her husband. She should very devoutly worship her husband as a representative of Vāsudeva.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O beautiful wife! A wife devoted to her husband, desiring the highest benefit, should very devoutly worship her husband as a representative of Vāsudeva.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.36

↗
సోఽహం త్వయార్చితో భద్రే ఈద‍ృగ్భావేన భక్తిత: । తం తే సమ్పాదయే కామమసతీనాం సుదుర్లభమ్ ॥ ౩౬ ॥
so ’haṁ tvayārcito bhadre
[so ’ham tvayaarchito bhadre]
īdṛg-bhāvena bhaktitaḥ
[eedrig-bhaavena bhaktitah]
taṁ te sampādaye kāmam
[tam te sampaadaye kaamam]
asatīnāṁ sudurlabham
[asateenaam sudurlabham]
saḥ — such a person aham — I tvayā — by you arcitaḥ — worshiped bhadre — O gentle woman īdṛk-bhāvena — in such a way bhaktitaḥ — with devotion tam — that te — your sampādaye — shall fulfill kāmam — desire asatīnām — for unchaste women su-durlabham — not obtainable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’haṁ tvayārcito bhadre
īdṛg-bhāvena bhaktitaḥ
taṁ te sampādaye kāmam
saḥ
such a person
aham
I
tvayā
by you
arcitaḥ
worshiped
asatīnāṁ sudurlabham
bhadre
O gentle woman
īdṛk-bhāvena
in such a way
bhaktitaḥ
with devotion
tam
that
te
your
sampādaye
shall fulfill
kāmam
desire
asatīnām
for unchaste women
su-durlabham
not obtainable.
My dear gentle wife, because you have worshiped me with great devotion, considering me a representative of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, I shall reward you by fulfilling your desires, which are unobtainable for an unchaste wife.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O auspicious wife! Because you have worshiped me with great devotion, I shall reward you by fulfilling your desires, which are unobtainable for an unchaste wife.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.37

↗
దితిరువాచ వరదో యది మే బ్రహ్మన్ పుత్రమిన్ద్రహణం వృణే । అమృత్యుం మృతపుత్రాహం యేన మే ఘాతితౌ సుతౌ ॥ ౩౭ ॥
ditir uvāca
[ditir uvaacha]
varado yadi me brahman
[varado yadi me brahman]
putram indra-haṇaṁ vṛṇe
[putram indra-hanam vrine]
amṛtyuṁ mṛta-putrāhaṁ
[amrityum mrita-putraaham]
yena me ghātitau sutau
[yena me ghaatitau sutau]
ditiḥ uvāca — Diti said vara-daḥ — the giver of benedictions yadi — if me — to me brahman — O great soul putram — a son indra-haṇam — who can kill Indra vṛṇe — I am asking for amṛtyum — immortal mṛta-putrā — whose sons are dead aham — I yena — by whom me — my ghātitau — were caused to be killed sutau — two sons.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ditir uvāca
ditiḥ uvāca
Diti said
vara-daḥ
the giver of benedictions
varado yadi me brahman
yadi
if
me
to me
brahman
O great soul
putram indra-haṇaṁ vṛṇe
putram
a son
indra-haṇam
who can kill Indra
vṛṇe
I am asking for
amṛtyuṁ mṛta-putrāhaṁ
amṛtyum
immortal
mṛta-putrā
whose sons are dead
aham
I
yena me ghātitau sutau
yena
by whom
me
my
ghātitau
were caused to be killed
sutau
two sons.
Diti replied: O my husband, O great soul, I have now lost my sons. If you want to give me a benediction, I ask you for an immortal son who can kill Indra. I pray for this because Indra, with the help of Viṣṇu, has killed my two sons Hiraṇyākṣa and Hiraṇyakaśipu.

The word indra-haṇam means “one who can kill Indra,” but it also means “one who follows Indra.” The word amṛtyum refers to the demigods, who do not die like ordinary human beings because they have extremely long durations of life. For example, the duration of Lord Brahmā’s life is stated in Bhagavad-gītā: sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ. Even the duration of one day, or twelve hours, of Brahmā is 4,300,000 years multiplied by one thousand. Thus the duration of his life is inconceivable for an ordinary human being. The demigods are therefore sometimes called amara, which means “one who has no death.” In this material world, however, everyone has to die. Therefore the word amṛtyum indicates that Diti wanted a son who would be equal in status to the demigods.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Diti said: O great soul! If you are a giver of benedictions, I ask for an immortal son who can kill Indra, who killed my two sons. Indra-haṇam means “killer of Indra.” But it can also mean a follower of Indra since han can mean “to go.” Amṛtum means “not to be killed by anyone.” It also means that he will be a devatā, immortal. One devatā Māruta would be divided into forty-nine parts. Thus the word putram is in the singular.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.38

↗
నిశమ్య తద్వచో విప్రో విమనా: పర్యతప్యత । అహో అధర్మ: సుమహానద్య మే సముపస్థిత: ॥ ౩౮ ॥
niśamya tad-vaco vipro
[nishamya tad-vacho vipro]
vimanāḥ paryatapyata
[vimanaah paryatapyata]
aho adharmaḥ sumahān
[aho adharmah sumahaan]
adya me samupasthitaḥ
[adya me samupasthitah]
niśamya — hearing tat-vacaḥ — her words vipraḥ — the brāhmaṇa vimanāḥ — aggrieved paryatapyata — lamented aho — alas adharmaḥ — impiety su-mahān — very great adya — today me — upon me samupasthitaḥ — has come.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
niśamya tad-vaco vipro
niśamya
hearing
tat-vacaḥ
her words
vipraḥ
the brāhmaṇa
vimanāḥ paryatapyata
vimanāḥ
aggrieved
paryatapyata
lamented
aho adharmaḥ sumahān
aho
alas
adharmaḥ
impiety
su-mahān
very great
adya me samupasthitaḥ
adya
today
me
upon me
samupasthitaḥ
has come.
Upon hearing Diti’s request, Kaśyapa Muni was very much aggrieved. “Alas,” he lamented, “now I face the danger of the impious act of killing Indra.”

Although Kaśyapa Muni was eager to fulfill the desire of his wife Diti, when he heard that she wanted a son to kill Indra his jubilation was immediately reduced to nothing because he was averse to the idea.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Upon hearing Diti's request, sorrowful Kaśyapa experienced great pained. "Great sin has come to me today." Kaśypa was full of sorrow because granting her wish meant the death of Indra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.39

↗
అహో అర్థేన్ద్రియారామో యోషిన్మయ్యేహ మాయయా । గృహీతచేతా: కృపణ: పతిష్యే నరకే ధ్రువమ్ ॥ ౩౯ ॥
aho arthendriyārāmo
[aho arthendriyaaraamo]
yoṣin-mayyeha māyayā
[yoshin-mayyeha maayayaa]
gṛhīta-cetāḥ kṛpaṇaḥ
[griheeta-chetaah kripanah]
patiṣye narake dhruvam
[patishye narake dhruvam]
aho — alas artha-indriya-ārāmaḥ — too attached to material enjoyment yoṣit-mayyā — in the form of a woman iha — here māyayā — by the illusory energy gṛhīta-cetāḥ — my mind being captivated kṛpaṇaḥ — wretched patiṣye — I shall fall narake — to hell dhruvam — surely.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho arthendriyārāmo
aho
alas
artha-indriya-ārāmaḥ
too attached to material enjoyment
yoṣin-mayyeha māyayā
yoṣit-mayyā
in the form of a woman
iha
here
māyayā
by the illusory energy
gṛhīta-cetāḥ kṛpaṇaḥ
gṛhīta-cetāḥ
my mind being captivated
kṛpaṇaḥ
wretched
patiṣye narake dhruvam
patiṣye
I shall fall
narake
to hell
dhruvam
surely.
Kaśyapa Muni thought: Alas, I have now become too attached to material enjoyment. Taking advantage of this, my mind has been attracted by the illusory energy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead in the form of a woman [my wife]. Therefore I am surely a wretched person who will glide down toward hell.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Attached to material enjoyment and captivated by māyā in the form of my wife, being in a miserable position, I will certainly fall to hell.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.40

↗
కోఽతిక్రమోఽనువర్తన్త్యా: స్వభావమిహ యోషిత: । ధిఙ్‌మాం బతాబుధం స్వార్థే యదహం త్వజితేన్ద్రియ: ॥ ౪౦ ॥
ko ’tikramo ’nuvartantyāḥ
[ko ’tikramo ’nuvartantyaah]
svabhāvam iha yoṣitaḥ
[svabhaavam iha yoshitah]
dhiṅ māṁ batābudhaṁ svārthe
[dhin maam bataabudham svaarthe]
yad ahaṁ tv ajitendriyaḥ
[yad aham tv ajitendriyah]
kaḥ — what atikramaḥ — offense anuvartantyāḥ — following sva-bhāvam — her nature iha — here yoṣitaḥ — of the woman dhik — condemnation mām — unto me bata — alas abudham — not conversant sva-arthe — in what is good for me yat — because aham — I tu — indeed ajita-indriyaḥ — unable to control my senses.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ko ’tikramo ’nuvartantyāḥ
kaḥ
what
svabhāvam iha yoṣitaḥ
dhiṅ māṁ batābudhaṁ svārthe
atikramaḥ
offense
anuvartantyāḥ
following
sva-bhāvam
her nature
iha
here
yoṣitaḥ
of the woman
dhik
condemnation
mām
unto me
bata
alas
abudham
not conversant
sva-arthe
in what is good for me
yad ahaṁ tv ajitendriyaḥ
yat
because
aham
I
tu
indeed
ajita-indriyaḥ
unable to control my senses.
This woman, my wife, has adopted a means that follows her nature, and therefore she is not to be blamed. But I am a man. Therefore, all condemnation upon me! I am not at all conversant with what is good for me, since I could not control my senses.

The natural instinct of a woman is to enjoy the material world. She induces her husband to enjoy this world by satisfying his tongue, belly and genitals, which are called jihvā, udara and upastha. A woman is expert in cooking palatable dishes so that she can easily satisfy her husband in eating. When one eats nicely, his belly is satisfied, and as soon as the belly is satisfied the genitals become strong. Especially when a man is accustomed to eating meat and drinking wine and similar passionate things, he certainly becomes sexually inclined. It should be understood that sexual inclinations are meant not for spiritual progress but for gliding down to hell. Thus Kaśyapa Muni considered his situation and lamented. In other words, to be a householder is very risky unless one is trained and the wife is a follower of her husband. A husband should be trained at the very beginning of his life. Kaumāra ācaret prājṣo dharmān bhāgavatān iha ( Bhāg. 7.6.1 ). During the time of brahmacarya, or student life, a brahmacārī should be taught to be expert in bhāgavata-dharma, devotional service. Then when he marries, if his wife is faithful to her husband and follows him in such life, the relationship between husband and wife is very desirable. However, a relationship between husband and wife without spiritual consciousness but strictly for sense gratification is not at all good. It is said in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (12.2.3) that especially in this age, Kali-yuga, dām-patye ’bhirucir hetuḥ: the relationship between husband and wife will be based on sexual power. Therefore householder life in this Kali-yuga is extremely dangerous unless both the wife and husband take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What offense is there if a woman follows her cruel nature? But what misfortune for me, ignorant of my own benefit, since I have uncontrolled senses! What offense is there for woman who simply follows her nature of cruelty?
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.41

↗
శరత్పద్మోత్సవం వక్త్రం వచశ్చ శ్రవణామృతమ్ । హృదయం క్షురధారాభం స్త్రీణాం కో వేద చేష్టితమ్ ॥ ౪౧ ॥
śarat-padmotsavaṁ vaktraṁ
[sharat-padmotsavam vaktram]
vacaś ca śravaṇāmṛtam
[vachash cha shravanaamritam]
hṛdayaṁ kṣura-dhārābhaṁ
[hridayam kshura-dhaaraabham]
strīṇāṁ ko veda ceṣṭitam
[streenaam ko veda cheshtitam]
śarat — in the autumn padma — a lotus flower utsavam — blossoming vaktram — face vacaḥ — words ca — and śravaṇa — to the ear amṛtam — giving pleasure hṛdayam — heart kṣura-dhārā — the blade of a razor ābham — like strīṇām — of women kaḥ — who veda — knows ceṣṭitam — the dealings.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śarat-padmotsavaṁ vaktraṁ
śarat
in the autumn
padma
a lotus flower
utsavam
blossoming
vaktram
face
vacaḥ
words
vacaś ca śravaṇāmṛtam
ca
and
śravaṇa
to the ear
amṛtam
giving pleasure
hṛdayaṁ kṣura-dhārābhaṁ
hṛdayam
heart
kṣura-dhārā
the blade of a razor
ābham
like
strīṇāṁ ko veda ceṣṭitam
strīṇām
of women
kaḥ
who
veda
knows
ceṣṭitam
the dealings.
A woman’s face is as attractive and beautiful as a blossoming lotus flower during autumn. Her words are very sweet, and they give pleasure to the ear, but if we study a woman’s heart, we can understand it to be extremely sharp, like the blade of a razor. In these circumstances, who could understand the dealings of a woman?

Woman is now depicted very well from the materialistic point of view by Kaśyapa Muni. Women are generally known as the fair sex, and especially in youth, at the age of sixteen or seventeen, women are very attractive to men. Therefore a woman’s face is compared to a blooming lotus flower in autumn. Just as a lotus is extremely beautiful in autumn, a woman at the threshold of youthful beauty is extremely attractive. In Sanskrit a woman’s voice is called nārī-svara because women generally sing and their singing is very attractive. At the present moment, cinema artists, especially female singers, are especially welcome. Some of them earn fabulous amounts of money simply by singing. Therefore, as taught by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, a woman’s singing is dangerous because it can make a sannyāsī fall a victim to the woman. Sannyāsa means giving up the company of women, but if a sannyāsī hears the voice of a woman and sees her beautiful face, he certainly becomes attracted and is sure to fall down. There have been many examples. Even the great sage Viśvāmitra fell a victim to Menakā. Therefore a person desiring to advance in spiritual consciousness must be especially careful not to see a woman’s face or hear a woman’s voice. To see a woman’s face and appreciate its beauty or to hear a woman’s voice and appreciate her singing as very nice is a subtle falldown for a brahmacārī or sannyāsī. Thus the description of a woman’s features by Kaśyapa Muni is very instructive.

When a woman’s bodily features are attractive, when her face is beautiful and when her voice is sweet, she is naturally a trap for a man. The śāstras advise that when such a woman comes to serve a man, she should be considered to be like a dark well covered by grass. In the fields there are many such wells, and a man who does not know about them drops through the grass and falls down. Thus there are many such instructions. Since the attraction of the material world is based on attraction for women, Kaśyapa Muni thought, “Under the circumstances, who can understand the heart of a woman?” Cāṇakya Paṇḍita has also advised, viśvāso naiva kartavyaḥ strīṣu rāja-kuleṣu ca: “There are two persons one should not trust — a politician and a woman.” These, of course, are authoritative śāstric injunctions, and we should therefore be very careful in our dealings with women.

Sometimes our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is criticized for mingling men and women, but Kṛṣṇa consciousness is meant for anyone. Whether one is a man or woman does not matter. Lord Kṛṣṇa personally says, striyo vaiśyās tathā śūdrās te ’pi yānti parāṁ gatim: whether one is a woman, śūdra or vaiśya, not to speak of being a brāhmaṇa or kṣatriya, everyone is fit to return home, back to Godhead, if he strictly follows the instructions of the spiritual master and śāstra. We therefore request all the members of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement — both men and women — not to be attracted by bodily features but only to be attracted by Kṛṣṇa. Then everything will be all right. Otherwise there will be danger.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Who knows the dealings of women, who have faces like lotuses blooming in autumn, words sweet to the ears, and hearts sharp like a razor blade? He explains the nature of women.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.42

↗
న హి కశ్చిత్ప్రియ: స్త్రీణామఞ్జసా స్వాశిషాత్మనామ్ । పతిం పుత్రం భ్రాతరం వా ఘ్నన్త్యర్థే ఘాతయన్తి చ ॥ ౪౨ ॥
na hi kaścit priyaḥ strīṇām
[na hi kashchit priyah streenaam]
aṣjasā svāśiṣātmanām
[ashjasaa svaashishaatmanaam]
patiṁ putraṁ bhrātaraṁ vā
[patim putram bhraataram vaa]
ghnanty arthe ghātayanti ca
[ghnanty arthe ghaatayanti cha]
na — not hi — certainly kaścit — anyone priyaḥ — dear strīṇām — to women aṣjasā — actually sva-āśiṣā — for their own interests ātmanām — most dear patim — husband putram — son bhrātaram — brother vā — or ghnanti — they kill arthe — for their own interests ghātayanti — cause to be killed ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na hi kaścit priyaḥ strīṇām
na
not
hi
certainly
kaścit
anyone
priyaḥ
dear
strīṇām
to women
aṣjasā svāśiṣātmanām
aṣjasā
actually
sva-āśiṣā
for their own interests
ātmanām
most dear
patiṁ putraṁ bhrātaraṁ vā
patim
husband
putram
son
bhrātaram
brother
vā
or
ghnanty arthe ghātayanti ca
ghnanti
they kill
arthe
for their own interests
ghātayanti
cause to be killed
ca
also.
To satisfy their own interests, women deal with men as if the men were most dear to them, but no one is actually dear to them. Women are supposed to be very saintly, but for their own interests they can kill even their husbands, sons or brothers, or cause them to be killed by others.

A woman’s nature has been particularly well studied by Kaśyapa Muni. Women are self-interested by nature, and therefore they should be protected by all means so that their natural inclination to be too self-interested will not be manifested. Women need to be protected by men. A woman should be cared for by her father in her childhood, by her husband in her youth and by her grown sons in her old age. This is the injunction of Manu, who says that a woman should not be given independence at any stage. Women must be cared for so that they will not be free to manifest their natural tendency for gross selfishness. There have been many cases, even in the present day, in which women have killed their husbands to take advantage of their insurance policies. This is not a criticism of women but a practical study of their nature. Such natural instincts of a woman or a man are manifested only in the bodily conception of life. When either a man or a woman is advanced in spiritual consciousness, the bodily conception of life practically vanishes. We should see all women as spiritual units ( ahaṁ brahmāsmi ), whose only duty is to satisfy Kṛṣṇa. Then the influences of the different modes of material nature, which result from one’s possessing a material body, will not act.

The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is so beneficial that it can very easily counteract the contamination of material nature, which results from one’s possessing a material body. Bhagavad-gītā therefore teaches, in the very beginning, that whether one is a man or a woman, one must know that he or she is not the body but a spiritual soul. Everyone should be interested in the activities of the spirit soul, not the body. As long as one is activated by the bodily conception of life, there is always the danger of being misled, whether one is a man or a woman. The soul is sometimes described as puruṣa because whether one is dressed as a man or a woman, one is inclined to enjoy this material world. One who has this spirit of enjoyment is described as puruṣa. Whether one is a man or a woman, he is not interested in serving others; everyone is interested in satisfying his or her own senses. Kṛṣṇa consciousness, however, provides first-class training for a man or a woman. A man should be trained to be a first-class devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and a woman should be trained to be a very chaste follower of her husband. That will make the lives of both of them happy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
No one is dear to women. For their own interests, by their own will, they will themselves kill or have others kill their husband, son, or brother. Svāśiṣā ātmanām means “of women who make efforts (ātmā) by their own desire.” Thus they do not act for the happiness of the husband. It can be taken as a compound in which the noun ending is not dropped (āśiśā).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.43

↗
ప్రతిశ్రుతం దదామీతి వచస్తన్న మృషా భవేత్ । వధం నార్హతి చేన్ద్రోఽపి తత్రేదముపకల్పతే ॥ ౪౩ ॥
pratiśrutaṁ dadāmīti
[pratishrutam dadaameeti]
vacas tan na mṛṣā bhavet
[vachas tan na mrishaa bhavet]
vadhaṁ nārhati cendro ’pi
[vadham naarhati chendro ’pi]
tatredam upakalpate
[tatredam upakalpate]
pratiśrutam — promised dadāmi — I shall give iti — thus vacaḥ — statement tat — that na — not mṛṣā — false bhavet — can be vadham — killing na — not arhati — is suitable ca — and indraḥ — Indra api — also tatra — in that connection idam — this upakalpate — is suitable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pratiśrutaṁ dadāmīti
pratiśrutam
promised
dadāmi
I shall give
iti
thus
vacas tan na mṛṣā bhavet
vacaḥ
statement
tat
that
na
not
mṛṣā
false
bhavet
can be
vadhaṁ nārhati cendro ’pi
vadham
killing
na
not
arhati
is suitable
ca
and
indraḥ
Indra
api
also
tatredam upakalpate
tatra
in that connection
idam
this
upakalpate
is suitable.
I promised to give her a benediction, and this promise cannot be violated, but Indra does not deserve to be killed. In these circumstances, the solution I have is quite suitable.

Kaśyapa Muni concluded, “Diti is eager to have a son who can kill Indra, since she is a woman, after all, and is not very intelligent. I shall train her in such a way that instead of always thinking of how to kill Indra, she will become a Vaiṣṇava, a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. If she agrees to follow the rules and regulations of the Vaiṣṇava principles, the unclean core of her heart will certainly be cleansed.” Ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam. This is the process of devotional service. Anyone can be purified by following the principles of devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, for Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so powerful that it can purify even the dirtiest class of men and transform them into the topmost Vaiṣṇavas. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s movement aims at this purpose. Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura says:

vrajendra-nandana yei, śacī-suta haila sei, balarāma ha-ila nitāi dīna-hīna yata chila, hari-nāme uddhārila, ta’ra sākṣī jagāi-mādhāi

The appearance of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu in this Kali-yuga is especially meant to deliver the fallen souls, who are always planning something for material enjoyment. He gave the people of this age the advantage of being able to chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra and thus become fully pure, free from all material contamination. Once one becomes a pure Vaiṣṇava, he transcends all material conceptions of life. Thus Kaśyapa Muni tried to transform his wife into a Vaiṣṇavī so that she might give up the idea of killing Indra. He wanted both her and her sons to be purified so that they would be fit to become pure Vaiṣṇavas. Of course, sometimes a practitioner deviates from the Vaiṣṇava principles, and there is a chance that he may fall down, but Kaśyapa Muni thought that even if one falls while practicing the Vaiṣṇava principles, he is still not a loser. Even a fallen Vaiṣṇava is eligible for better results, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā. Svalpam apy asya dharmasya trāyate mahato bhayāt: even practicing the Vaiṣṇava principles to a small extent can save one from the greatest danger of material existence. Thus Kaśyapa Muni planned to instruct his wife Diti to become a Vaiṣṇava because he wanted to save the life of Indra.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I made a promise to her, and this promise cannot be violated, but also, Indra should not to be killed. In these circumstances, the solution I have is suitable. Tatredam upakalpate means “this is suitable.” The meaning is this. I will teach her a Vaiṣṇava austerity. When her heart becomes purified by that austerity, she will no longer have anger at Indra. Thus she will not want to kill him. She will not kill Indra because the Vaiṣṇava vow she undertakes will not bestow evil results even if desired. However, then the words of request in her prayer will be nullified. Since han can mean “go” as well as “kill,” she will have a son who will follow Indra instead of killing him, who will be a devatā, not a demon. Because of the length of the vow, there will certainly be some irregularity in her performance. But by that vow, her mind will concentrate while she is unaware of it. Though there may be irregularity in a Vaiṣṇava vow, the result will still be given. Her efforts will thus be successful.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.44

↗
ఇతి సఞ్చిన్త్య భగవాన్మారీచ: కురునన్దన । ఉవాచ కిఞ్చిత్ కుపిత ఆత్మానం చ విగర్హయన్ ॥ ౪౪ ॥
iti saṣcintya bhagavān
[iti sashchintya bhagavaan]
mārīcaḥ kurunandana
[maareechah kurunandana]
uvāca kiṣcit kupita
[uvaacha kishchit kupita]
ātmānaṁ ca vigarhayan
[aatmaanam cha vigarhayan]
iti — thus saṣcintya — thinking bhagavān — the powerful mārīcaḥ — Kaśyapa Muni kuru-nandana — O descendant of Kuru uvāca — spoke kiṣcit — somewhat kupitaḥ — angry ātmānam — himself ca — and vigarhayan — condemning.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti saṣcintya bhagavān
iti
thus
saṣcintya
thinking
bhagavān
the powerful
mārīcaḥ kurunandana
mārīcaḥ
Kaśyapa Muni
kuru-nandana
O descendant of Kuru
uvāca kiṣcit kupita
uvāca
spoke
kiṣcit
somewhat
kupitaḥ
angry
ātmānaṁ ca vigarhayan
ātmānam
himself
ca
and
vigarhayan
condemning.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Kaśyapa Muni, thinking in this way, became somewhat angry. Condemning himself, O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, descendant of Kuru, he spoke to Diti as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Parīkṣit! Kaśyapa, thinking in this way and somewhat angry, while condemning himself, spoke to Diti as follows.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.45

↗
శ్రీకశ్యప ఉవాచ పుత్రస్తే భవితా భద్రే ఇన్ద్రహాదేవబాన్ధవ: । సంవత్సరం వ్రతమిదం యద్యఞ్జో ధారయిష్యసి ॥ ౪౫ ॥
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
[shree-kashyapa uvaacha]
putras te bhavitā bhadre
[putras te bhavitaa bhadre]
indra-hādeva-bāndhavaḥ
[indra-haadeva-baandhavah]
saṁvatsaraṁ vratam idaṁ
[samvatsaram vratam idam]
yady aṣjo dhārayiṣyasi
[yady ashjo dhaarayishyasi]
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca — Kaśyapa Muni said putraḥ — son te — your bhavitā — will be bhadre — O gentle woman indra-hā — killer of Indra, or follower of Indra adeva-bāndhavaḥ — friend of the demons (or deva-bāndhavaḥ — friend of the demigods) saṁvatsaram — for a year vratam — vow idam — this yadi — if aṣjaḥ — properly dhārayiṣyasi — you will execute.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca
Kaśyapa Muni said
putras te bhavitā bhadre
putraḥ
son
te
your
bhavitā
will be
bhadre
O gentle woman
indra-hādeva-bāndhavaḥ
indra-hā
killer of Indra, or follower of Indra
adeva-bāndhavaḥ
friend of the demons (or deva-bāndhavaḥ — friend of the demigods)
saṁvatsaraṁ vratam idaṁ
saṁvatsaram
for a year
vratam
vow
idam
this
yady aṣjo dhārayiṣyasi
yadi
if
aṣjaḥ
properly
dhārayiṣyasi
you will execute.
Kaśyapa Muni said: My dear gentle wife, if you follow my instructions regarding this vow for at least one year, you will surely get a son who will be able to kill Indra. However, if you deviate from this vow of following the Vaiṣṇava principles, you will get a son who will be favorable to Indra.

The word indra-hā refers to an asura who is always eager to kill Indra. An enemy of Indra is naturally a friend to the asuras, but the word indra-hā also refers to one who follows Indra or who is obedient to him. When one becomes a devotee of Indra, he is certainly a friend to the demigods. Thus the words indra-hādeva-bāndhavaḥ are equivocal, for they say, “Your son will kill Indra, but he will be very friendly to the demigods.” If a person actually became a friend of the demigods, he certainly would not be able to kill Indra.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kaśyapa Muni said: My gentle wife! If you execute this vow properly for one year, you will get a son who will kill Indra and will be a friend of the demons. The meaning desired by Diti was that she would get a son who would kill Indra and be a friend of the demons. Kaśyapa’s meaning however was that she would get a son who would follow Indra and be a friend of the devatās.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.46

↗
దితిరువాచ ధారయిష్యే వ్రతం బ్రహ్మన్బ్రూహి కార్యాణి యాని మే । యాని చేహ నిషిద్ధాని న వ్రతం ఘ్నన్తి యాన్యుత ॥ ౪౬ ॥
ditir uvāca
[ditir uvaacha]
dhārayiṣye vrataṁ brahman
[dhaarayishye vratam brahman]
brūhi kāryāṇi yāni me
[broohi kaaryaani yaani me]
yāni ceha niṣiddhāni
[yaani cheha nishiddhaani]
na vrataṁ ghnanti yāny uta
[na vratam ghnanti yaany uta]
ditiḥ uvāca — Diti said dhārayiṣye — I shall accept vratam — vow brahman — my dear brāhmaṇa brūhi — please state kāryāṇi — must be done yāni — what me — to me yāni — what ca — and iha — here niṣiddhāni — is forbidden na — not vratam — the vow ghnanti — break yāni — what uta — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ditir uvāca
ditiḥ uvāca
Diti said
dhārayiṣye vrataṁ brahman
dhārayiṣye
I shall accept
vratam
vow
brahman
my dear brāhmaṇa
brūhi kāryāṇi yāni me
brūhi
please state
kāryāṇi
must be done
yāni
what
me
to me
yāni ceha niṣiddhāni
yāni
what
ca
and
iha
here
niṣiddhāni
is forbidden
na vrataṁ ghnanti yāny uta
na
not
vratam
the vow
ghnanti
break
yāni
what
uta
also.
Diti replied: My dear brāhmaṇa, I must accept your advice and follow the vow. Now let me understand what I have to do, what is forbidden and what will not break the vow. Please clearly state all this to me.

As stated above, a woman is generally inclined to serve her own purposes. Kaśyapa Muni proposed to train Diti to fulfill her desires within one year, and since she was eager to kill Indra, she immediately agreed, saying, “Please let me know what the vow is and how I have to follow it. I promise that I shall do the needful and not break the vow.” This is another side of a woman’s psychology. Even though a woman is very fond of fulfilling her own plans, when someone instructs her, especially her husband, she innocently follows, and thus she can be trained for better purposes. By nature a woman wants to be a follower of a man; therefore if the man is good the woman can be trained for a good purpose.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Diti said: O brāhmaṇa! I will follow the vow. Please tell me what should be done and what is forbidden for me, and what will not break the vow.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.47

↗
శ్రీకశ్యప ఉవాచ న హింస్యాద్భ‍ూతజాతాని న శపేన్నానృతం వదేత్ । న ఛిన్ద్యాన్నఖరోమాణి న స్పృశేద్యదమఙ్గలమ్ ॥ ౪౭ ॥
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
[shree-kashyapa uvaacha]
na hiṁsyād bhūta-jātāni
[na himsyaad bhoota-jaataani]
na śapen nānṛtaṁ vadet
[na shapen naanritam vadet]
na chindyān nakha-romāṇi
[na chindyaan nakha-romaani]
na spṛśed yad amaṅgalam
[na sprished yad amangalam]
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca — Kaśyapa Muni said na hiṁsyāt — must not harm bhūta-jātāni — the living entities na śapet — must not curse na — not anṛtam — a lie vadet — must speak na chindyāt — must not cut nakha-romāṇi — the nails and hair na spṛśet — must not touch yat — that which amaṅgalam — impure.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-kaśyapa uvāca
śrī-kaśyapaḥ uvāca
Kaśyapa Muni said
na hiṁsyād bhūta-jātāni
na hiṁsyāt
must not harm
bhūta-jātāni
the living entities
na śapen nānṛtaṁ vadet
na śapet
must not curse
na
not
anṛtam
a lie
vadet
must speak
na chindyān nakha-romāṇi
na chindyāt
must not cut
nakha-romāṇi
the nails and hair
na spṛśed yad amaṅgalam
na spṛśet
must not touch
yat
that which
amaṅgalam
impure.
Kaśyapa Muni said: My dear wife, to follow this vow, do not be violent or cause harm to anyone. Do not curse anyone, and do not speak lies. Do not cut your nails and hair, and do not touch impure things like skulls and bones.

Kaśyapa Muni’s first instruction to his wife was not to be envious. The general tendency of anyone within this material world is to be envious, and therefore, to become a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, one must curb this tendency, as stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ( paramo nirmatsarāṇām ). A Kṛṣṇa conscious person is always nonenvious, whereas others are always envious. Thus Kaśyapa Muni’s instruction that his wife not be envious indicates that this is the first stage of advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Kaśyapa Muni desired to train his wife to be a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, for this would suffice to protect both her and Indra.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kaśyapa Muni said: Do harm to anyone. Do not curse anyone, and do not speak lies. Do not cut your nails and hair, and do not touch impure things. The first rule forbids her from desiring to kill Indra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.48

↗
నాప్సు స్‍నాయాన్న కుప్యేత న సమ్భాషేత దుర్జనై: । న వసీతాధౌతవాస: స్రజం చ విధృతాం క్‍వచిత్ ॥ ౪౮ ॥
nāpsu snāyān na kupyeta
[naapsu snaayaan na kupyeta]
na sambhāṣeta durjanaiḥ
[na sambhaasheta durjanaih]
na vasītādhauta-vāsaḥ
[na vaseetaadhauta-vaasah]
srajaṁ ca vidhṛtāṁ kvacit
[srajam cha vidhritaam kvachit]
na — not apsu — in water snāyāt — must bathe na kupyeta — must not become angry na sambhāṣeta — must not speak durjanaiḥ — with wicked persons na vasīta — must not wear adhauta-vāsaḥ — unwashed clothes srajam — flower garland ca — and vidhṛtām — which was already worn kvacit — ever.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāpsu snāyān na kupyeta
na
not
apsu
in water
snāyāt
must bathe
na kupyeta
must not become angry
na sambhāṣeta durjanaiḥ
na sambhāṣeta
must not speak
durjanaiḥ
with wicked persons
na vasītādhauta-vāsaḥ
na vasīta
must not wear
adhauta-vāsaḥ
unwashed clothes
srajaṁ ca vidhṛtāṁ kvacit
srajam
flower garland
ca
and
vidhṛtām
which was already worn
kvacit
ever.
Kaśyapa Muni continued: My dear gentle wife, never enter the water while bathing, never be angry, and do not even speak or associate with wicked people. Never wear clothes that have not been properly washed, and do not put on a garland that has already been worn.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Do not enter the water while bathing, never become angry, and do not even speak with sinful people. Never wear clothes that have not been properly washed, and do not put on a garland that has already been worn. Do not bath by entering water. Do not wear unwashed cloth. One should not wear a garland already worn by someone else (vidhṛtam).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.49

↗
నోచ్ఛిష్టం చణ్డికాన్నం చ సామిషం వృషలాహృతమ్ । భుఞ్జీతోదక్యయా ద‍ృష్టం పిబేన్నాఞ్జలినా త్వప: ॥ ౪౯ ॥
nocchiṣṭaṁ caṇḍikānnaṁ ca
[nochchishtam chandikaannam cha]
sāmiṣaṁ vṛṣalāhṛtam
[saamisham vrishalaahritam]
bhuṣjītodakyayā dṛṣṭaṁ
[bhushjeetodakyayaa drishtam]
piben nāṣjalinā tv apaḥ
[piben naashjalinaa tv apah]
na — not ucchiṣṭam — leftover food caṇḍikā-annam — food offered to the goddess Kālī ca — and sa-āmiṣam — mixed with flesh vṛṣala-āhṛtam — brought by a śūdra bhuṣjīta — must eat udakyayā — by a woman in her menstrual period dṛṣṭam — seen pibet na — must not drink aṣjalinā — by joining and cupping the two palms tu — also apaḥ — water.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nocchiṣṭaṁ caṇḍikānnaṁ ca
na
not
ucchiṣṭam
leftover food
caṇḍikā-annam
food offered to the goddess Kālī
ca
and
sāmiṣaṁ vṛṣalāhṛtam
sa-āmiṣam
mixed with flesh
vṛṣala-āhṛtam
brought by a śūdra
bhuṣjītodakyayā dṛṣṭaṁ
bhuṣjīta
must eat
udakyayā
by a woman in her menstrual period
dṛṣṭam
seen
piben nāṣjalinā tv apaḥ
pibet na
must not drink
aṣjalinā
by joining and cupping the two palms
tu
also
apaḥ
water.
Never eat leftover food, never eat prasāda offered to the goddess Kālī [Durgā], and do not eat anything contaminated by flesh or fish. Do not eat anything brought or touched by a śūdra nor anything seen by a woman in her menstrual period. Do not drink water by joining your palms.

Generally the goddess Kālī is offered food containing meat and fish, and therefore Kaśyapa Muni strictly forbade his wife to take the remnants of such food. Actually a Vaiṣṇava is not allowed to take any food offered to the demigods. A Vaiṣṇava is always fixed in accepting prasāda offered to Lord Viṣṇu. Through all these instructions, Kaśyapa Muni, in a negative way, instructed his wife Diti how to become a Vaiṣṇavī.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Never eat leftover food, never eat food offered to the goddess Kālī, and do not eat anything contaminated by flesh or fish, brought by a śūdra, or seen by a woman in her menstrual period. Do not drink water by joining your palms. There are five restrictions in eating. Caṇḍikānnam means food offered to Durgā. If food is touched by ants it also caṇḍikānnam, and therefore forbidden. Caṇḍika means an ant according to the dictionary. Udakyayā means “by a women in her menstrual period.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.50

↗
నోచ్ఛిష్టాస్పృష్టసలిలా సన్ధ్యాయాం ముక్తమూర్ధజా । అనర్చితాసంయతవాక్నాసంవీతా బహిశ్చరేత్ ॥ ౫౦ ॥
nocchiṣṭāspṛṣṭa-salilā
[nochchishtaasprishta-salilaa]
sandhyāyāṁ mukta-mūrdhajā
[sandhyaayaam mukta-moordhajaa]
anarcitāsaṁyata-vāk
[anarchitaasamyata-vaak]
nāsaṁvītā bahiś caret
[naasamveetaa bahish charet]
na — not ucchiṣṭā — after eating aspṛṣṭa-salilā — without washing sandhyāyām — in the evening mukta-mūrdhajā — with the hair loose anarcitā — without ornaments asaṁyata-vāk — without being grave na — not asaṁvītā — without being covered bahiḥ — outside caret — should go.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nocchiṣṭāspṛṣṭa-salilā
sandhyāyāṁ mukta-mūrdhajā
anarcitāsaṁyata-vāk
na
not
ucchiṣṭā
after eating
aspṛṣṭa-salilā
without washing
sandhyāyām
in the evening
mukta-mūrdhajā
with the hair loose
anarcitā
without ornaments
nāsaṁvītā bahiś caret
asaṁyata-vāk
without being grave
na
not
asaṁvītā
without being covered
bahiḥ
outside
caret
should go.
After eating, you should not go out to the street without having washed your mouth, hands and feet. You should not go out in the evening or with your hair loose, nor should you go out unless you are properly decorated with ornaments. You should not leave the house unless you are very grave and are sufficiently covered.

Kaśyapa Muni advised his wife not to go out onto the street unless she was well decorated and well dressed. He did not encourage the miniskirts that have now become fashionable. In Oriental civilization, when a woman goes out onto the street, she must be fully covered so that no man will recognize who she is. All these methods are to be accepted for purification. If one takes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one is fully purified, and thus one remains always transcendental to the contamination of the material world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You should not go out on the street with food in you mouth or on the hands. You should not go outside without first having washed your mouth. You should not go outside in the evening, without binding your hair, without ornaments, without controlled speaking, and without being covered. For going out of the house, there are seven forbidden items. Aspṛṣta-salilā means without doing ācamana. Anarcitā means “without ornaments.” Asamvītā means without covering the whole body.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.51

↗
నాధౌతపాదాప్రయతా నార్ద్రపాదా ఉదక్శిరా: । శయీత నాపరాఙ్‌నాన్యైర్న నగ్నా న చ సన్ధ్యయో: ॥ ౫౧ ॥
nādhauta-pādāprayatā
[naadhauta-paadaaprayataa]
nārdra-pādā udak-śirāḥ
[naardra-paadaa udak-shiraah]
śayīta nāparāṅ nānyair
[shayeeta naaparaan naanyair]
na nagnā na ca sandhyayoḥ
[na nagnaa na cha sandhyayoh]
na — not adhauta-pādā — without washing the feet aprayatā — without being purified na — not ardra-pādā — with wet feet udak-śirāḥ — with the head toward the north śayīta — should lie down na — not aparāk — with the head pointed west na — not anyaiḥ — with other women na — not nagnā — naked na — not ca — and sandhyayoḥ — at sunrise and sunset.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nādhauta-pādāprayatā
na
not
adhauta-pādā
without washing the feet
aprayatā
without being purified
nārdra-pādā udak-śirāḥ
na
not
ardra-pādā
with wet feet
udak-śirāḥ
with the head toward the north
śayīta nāparāṅ nānyair
śayīta
should lie down
na
not
aparāk
with the head pointed west
na
not
anyaiḥ
with other women
na nagnā na ca sandhyayoḥ
na
not
nagnā
naked
na
not
ca
and
sandhyayoḥ
at sunrise and sunset.
You should not lie down without having washed both of your feet or without being purified, nor with wet feet or with your head pointed west or north. You should not lie naked, or with other women, or during the sunrise or sunset.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You should not lie down without having first washed your feet, without being purified, and you should not lie down with wet feet, with your head pointed west, with head pointed north, naked, in the company of others, or during the sunrise or sunset. There are eight items forbidden for sleeping. Aprayatā means impure. Amara-koṣa says pavitraḥ and prayataḥ are synonyms for “pure.” The head should not point west (na aparāṇ).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.52

↗
ధౌతవాసా శుచిర్నిత్యం సర్వమఙ్గలసంయుతా । పూజయేత్ప్రాతరాశాత్ప్రాగ్గోవిప్రాఞ్ శ్రియమచ్యుతమ్ ॥ ౫౨ ॥
dhauta-vāsā śucir nityaṁ
[dhauta-vaasaa shuchir nityam]
sarva-maṅgala-saṁyutā
[sarva-mangala-samyutaa]
pūjayet prātarāśāt prāg
[poojayet praataraashaat praag]
go-viprāṣ śriyam acyutam
[go-vipraash shriyam achyutam]
dhauta-vāsā — wearing washed cloth śuciḥ — being purified nityam — always sarva-maṅgala — with all auspicious items saṁyutā — adorned pūjayet — one should worship prātaḥ-āśāt prāk — before breakfast go-viprān — the cows and brāhmaṇas śriyam — the goddess of fortune acyutam — the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhauta-vāsā śucir nityaṁ
dhauta-vāsā
wearing washed cloth
śuciḥ
being purified
nityam
always
sarva-maṅgala-saṁyutā
sarva-maṅgala
with all auspicious items
saṁyutā
adorned
pūjayet prātarāśāt prāg
pūjayet
one should worship
prātaḥ-āśāt prāk
before breakfast
go-viprāṣ śriyam acyutam
go-viprān
the cows and brāhmaṇas
śriyam
the goddess of fortune
acyutam
the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Putting on washed clothing, being always pure and being adorned with turmeric, sandalwood pulp and other auspicious items, before breakfast one should worship the cows, the brāhmaṇas, the goddess of fortune and the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

If one is trained to honor and worship the cows and brāhmaṇas, he is actually civilized. The worship of the Supreme Lord is recommended, and the Lord is very fond of the cows and brāhmaṇas ( namo brahmaṇya-devāya go-brāhmaṇa-hitāya ca ). In other words, a civilization in which there is no respect for the cows and brāhmaṇas is condemned. One cannot become spiritually advanced without acquiring the brahminical qualifications and giving protection to cows. Cow protection insures sufficient food prepared with milk, which is needed for an advanced civilization. One should not pollute civilization by eating the flesh of cows. A civilization must do something progressive, and then it is an Āryan civilization. Instead of killing the cow to eat flesh, civilized men must prepare various milk products that will enhance the condition of society. If one follows the brahminical culture, he will become competent in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Wearing washed clothing, being always pure, adorned with turmeric, sandalwood pulp and other auspicious items, before breakfast in the morning one should worship the cows, the brāhmaṇas, the goddess of fortune and the Supreme Lord. Now the positive rules are described. Prātar āśāt means “in the morning before eating.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.53

↗
స్త్రియో వీరవతీశ్చార్చేత్స్రగ్గన్ధబలిమణ్డనై: । పతిం చార్చ్యోపతిష్ఠేత ధ్యాయేత్కోష్ఠగతం చ తమ్ ॥ ౫౩ ॥
striyo vīravatīś cārcet
[striyo veeravateesh chaarchet]
srag-gandha-bali-maṇḍanaiḥ
[srag-gandha-bali-mandanaih]
patiṁ cārcyopatiṣṭheta
[patim chaarchyopatishtheta]
dhyāyet koṣṭha-gataṁ ca tam
[dhyaayet koshtha-gatam cha tam]
striyaḥ — women vīra-vatīḥ — possessing husbands and sons ca — and arcet — she should worship srak — with garlands gandha — sandalwood bali — presentations maṇḍanaiḥ — and with ornaments patim — the husband ca — and ārcya — worshiping upatiṣṭheta — should offer prayers dhyāyet — should meditate koṣṭha-gatam — situated in the womb ca — also tam — upon him.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
striyo vīravatīś cārcet
striyaḥ
women
vīra-vatīḥ
possessing husbands and sons
ca
and
arcet
she should worship
srag-gandha-bali-maṇḍanaiḥ
srak
with garlands
gandha
sandalwood
bali
presentations
maṇḍanaiḥ
and with ornaments
patiṁ cārcyopatiṣṭheta
patim
the husband
ca
and
ārcya
worshiping
upatiṣṭheta
should offer prayers
dhyāyet koṣṭha-gataṁ ca tam
dhyāyet
should meditate
koṣṭha-gatam
situated in the womb
ca
also
tam
upon him.
With flower garlands, sandalwood pulp, ornaments and other paraphernalia, a woman following this vow should worship women who have sons and whose husbands are living. The pregnant wife should worship her husband and offer him prayers. She should meditate upon him, thinking that he is situated in her womb.

The child in the womb is a part of the husband’s body. Therefore the husband, through his representative, indirectly remains within the womb of his pregnant wife.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With flower garlands, sandalwood pulp, ornaments and other paraphernalia, a woman following this vow should worship women whose husbands are living. She should worship her husband and offer him prayers. She should meditate upon him, thinking that he is situated in her womb. Vīra-vatīḥ means “with living husbands.” Koṣṭhah-gataḥ means “in the womb.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.54

↗
సాంవత్సరం పుంసవనం వ్రతమేతదవిప్లుతమ్ । ధారయిష్యసి చేత్తుభ్యం శక్రహా భవితా సుత: ॥ ౫౪ ॥
sāṁvatsaraṁ puṁsavanaṁ
[saamvatsaram pumsavanam]
vratam etad aviplutam
[vratam etad aviplutam]
dhārayiṣyasi cet tubhyaṁ
[dhaarayishyasi chet tubhyam]
śakra-hā bhavitā sutaḥ
[shakra-haa bhavitaa sutah]
sāṁvatsaram — for one year puṁsavanam — called puṁsavana vratam — vow etat — this aviplutam — without violation dhārayiṣyasi — you will perform cet — if tubhyam — for you śakra-hā — the killer of Indra bhavitā — will be sutaḥ — a son.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāṁvatsaraṁ puṁsavanaṁ
sāṁvatsaram
for one year
puṁsavanam
called puṁsavana
vratam etad aviplutam
vratam
vow
etat
this
aviplutam
without violation
dhārayiṣyasi cet tubhyaṁ
dhārayiṣyasi
you will perform
cet
if
tubhyam
for you
śakra-hā bhavitā sutaḥ
śakra-hā
the killer of Indra
bhavitā
will be
sutaḥ
a son.
Kaśyapa Muni continued: If you perform this ceremony called puṁsavana, adhering to the vow with faith for at least one year, you will give birth to a son destined to kill Indra. But if there is any discrepancy in the discharge of this vow, the son will be a friend to Indra.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If you perform this ceremony called puṁsavana without violations, you will give birth to a son who is śakra-hā (either the killer of Indra, or follower of Indra). Puṁsavanam means “giving a son.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.55

↗
బాఢమిత్యభ్యుపేత్యాథ దితీ రాజన్మహామనా: । కశ్యపాద్ గర్భమాధత్త వ్రతం చాఞ్జో దధార సా ॥ ౫౫ ॥
bāḍham ity abhyupetyātha
[baadham ity abhyupetyaatha]
ditī rājan mahā-manāḥ
[ditee raajan mahaa-manaah]
kaśyapād garbham ādhatta
[kashyapaad garbham aadhatta]
vrataṁ cāṣjo dadhāra sā
[vratam chaashjo dadhaara saa]
bāḍham — yes iti — thus abhyupetya — accepting atha — then ditiḥ — Diti rājan — O King mahā-manāḥ — jubilant kaśyapāt — from Kaśyapa garbham — semen ādhatta — obtained vratam — the vow ca — and aṣjaḥ — properly dadhāra — discharged sā — she.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bāḍham ity abhyupetyātha
bāḍham
yes
iti
thus
abhyupetya
accepting
atha
then
ditī rājan mahā-manāḥ
ditiḥ
Diti
rājan
O King
mahā-manāḥ
jubilant
kaśyapād garbham ādhatta
kaśyapāt
from Kaśyapa
garbham
semen
ādhatta
obtained
vrataṁ cāṣjo dadhāra sā
vratam
the vow
ca
and
aṣjaḥ
properly
dadhāra
discharged
sā
she.
O King Parīkṣit, Diti, the wife of Kaśyapa, agreed to undergo the purificatory process known as puṁsavana. “Yes,” she said, “I shall do everything according to your instructions.” With great jubilation she became pregnant, having taken semen from Kaśyapa, and faithfully began discharging the vow.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Diti agreed to undergo this vow. With great jubilation, taking semen from Kaśyapa, she followed the vow properly.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.56

↗
మాతృష్వసురభిప్రాయమిన్ద్ర ఆజ్ఞాయ మానద । శుశ్రూషణేనాశ్రమస్థాం దితిం పర్యచరత్కవి: ॥ ౫౬ ॥
mātṛ-ṣvasur abhiprāyam
[maatri-shvasur abhipraayam]
indra ājṣāya mānada
[indra aajshaaya maanada]
śuśrūṣaṇenāśrama-sthāṁ
[shushrooshanenaashrama-sthaam]
ditiṁ paryacarat kaviḥ
[ditim paryacharat kavih]
mātṛ-svasuḥ — of his mother’s sister abhiprāyam — the intention indraḥ — Indra ājṣāya — understanding māna-da — O King Parīkṣit, who give respect to everyone śuśrūṣaṇena — with service āśrama-sthām — residing in an āśrama ditim — Diti paryacarat — attended upon kaviḥ — seeing his own interest.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mātṛ-ṣvasur abhiprāyam
mātṛ-svasuḥ
of his mother’s sister
abhiprāyam
the intention
indra ājṣāya mānada
indraḥ
Indra
ājṣāya
understanding
māna-da
O King Parīkṣit, who give respect to everyone
śuśrūṣaṇenāśrama-sthāṁ
śuśrūṣaṇena
with service
āśrama-sthām
residing in an āśrama
ditiṁ paryacarat kaviḥ
ditim
Diti
paryacarat
attended upon
kaviḥ
seeing his own interest.
O King, who are respectful to everyone, Indra understood Diti’s purpose, and thus he contrived to fulfill his own interests. Following the logic that self-preservation is the first law of nature, he wanted to break Diti’s promise. Thus he engaged himself in the service of Diti, his aunt, who was residing in an āśrama.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O respectful King! Intelligent Indra, understanding Diti's purpose, engaged himself in the service of Diti, who was at that time residing in a hermitage. Mātṛṣvasuḥ means “of Diti.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.57

↗
నిత్యం వనాత్సుమనస: ఫలమూలసమిత్కుశాన్ । పత్రాఙ్కురమృదోఽపశ్చ కాలే కాల ఉపాహరత్ ॥ ౫౭ ॥
nityaṁ vanāt sumanasaḥ
[nityam vanaat sumanasah]
phala-mūla-samit-kuśān
[phala-moola-samit-kushaan]
patrāṅkura-mṛdo ’paś ca
[patraankura-mrido ’pash cha]
kāle kāla upāharat
[kaale kaala upaaharat]
nityam — daily vanāt — from the forest sumanasaḥ — flowers phala — fruits mūla — roots samit — wood for the sacrificial fire kuśān — and kuśa grass patra — leaves aṅkura — sprouts mṛdaḥ — and earth apaḥ — water ca — also kāle kāle — at the proper time upāharat — brought.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nityaṁ vanāt sumanasaḥ
nityam
daily
vanāt
from the forest
sumanasaḥ
flowers
phala-mūla-samit-kuśān
phala
fruits
mūla
roots
samit
wood for the sacrificial fire
kuśān
and kuśa grass
patrāṅkura-mṛdo ’paś ca
patra
leaves
aṅkura
sprouts
mṛdaḥ
and earth
apaḥ
water
ca
also
kāle kāla upāharat
kāle kāle
at the proper time
upāharat
brought.
Indra served his aunt daily by bringing flowers, fruits, roots and wood for yajṣas from the forest. He also brought kuśa grass, leaves, sprouts, earth and water exactly at the proper time.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra daily brought flowers, fruits, roots, wood, kuśa grass, leaves, sprouts, earth and water at the proper time.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.58

↗
ఏవం తస్యా వ్రతస్థాయా వ్రతచ్ఛిద్రం హరిర్నృప । ప్రేప్సు: పర్యచరజ్జిహ్మో మృగహేవ మృగాకృతి: ॥ ౫౮ ॥
evaṁ tasyā vrata-sthāyā
[evam tasyaa vrata-sthaayaa]
vrata-cchidraṁ harir nṛpa
[vrata-chchidram harir nripa]
prepsuḥ paryacaraj jihmo
[prepsuh paryacharaj jihmo]
mṛga-heva mṛgākṛtiḥ
[mriga-heva mrigaakritih]
evam — thus tasyāḥ — of her vrata-sthāyāḥ — who was faithfully discharging her vow vrata-chidram — a fault in the execution of the vow hariḥ — Indra nṛpa — O King prepsuḥ — desiring to find paryacarat — served jihmaḥ — deceitful mṛga-hā — a hunter iva — like mṛga-ākṛtiḥ — in the form of a deer.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ tasyā vrata-sthāyā
evam
thus
tasyāḥ
of her
vrata-sthāyāḥ
who was faithfully discharging her vow
vrata-cchidraṁ harir nṛpa
vrata-chidram
a fault in the execution of the vow
hariḥ
Indra
nṛpa
O King
prepsuḥ paryacaraj jihmo
prepsuḥ
desiring to find
paryacarat
served
jihmaḥ
deceitful
mṛga-heva mṛgākṛtiḥ
mṛga-hā
a hunter
iva
like
mṛga-ākṛtiḥ
in the form of a deer.
O King Parīkṣit, as the hunter of a deer becomes like a deer by covering his body with deerskin and serving the deer, so Indra, although at heart the enemy of the sons of Diti, became outwardly friendly and served Diti in a faithful way. Indra’s purpose was to cheat Diti as soon as he could find some fault in the way she discharged the vows of the ritualistic ceremony. However, he wanted to be undetected, and therefore he served her very carefully.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit! Just as a hunter becomes like a deer to kill the deer, so Indra served Diti with deceit, in order to find a fault in the vow of Diti who was fixed in her vow. Indra desired to find some fault in her vow. This however was his misconception. Since whatever faults exist are nullified by remembering and glorifying Viṣṇu, her vow should also become faultless, even if there was a fault. It is said: yasya smṛtyā ca nāmoktyā tapo-yajṣa-kriyādīṣu nūnaṁ sampūrṇatām eti sadyo vande tam acyutam I offer my obeisances unto the infallible Lord, because simply by either remembering him or chanting his name all penances, sacrifices or fruitive activities become perfect. Skanda Purāṇa mantratas tantrataś chidraṁ deśa-kālārha-vastutaḥ sarvaṁ karoti niśchidram anusaṅkīrtanaṁ tava There may be discrepancies in pronouncing the mantras and observing the regulative principles, because of discrepancies in regard to time, place, person and paraphernalia. But when your name is chanted, everything becomes faultless. SB 8.23.16 It will be said later that Indra would not find any fault in her performance of vows. Mahāpuruṣa-pūjāyāḥ siddhiḥ kāpy ānuṣaṅgiṇī: liberation is a secondary result of worship of the Lord. (SB 6.18.73) Jihmaḥ means deception. The hunter disguises himself as a deer to cheat the deer. Similarly Indra disguised himself as a devoted servant to cheat Diti.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.59

↗
నాధ్యగచ్ఛద్‌వ్రతచ్ఛిద్రం తత్పరోఽథ మహీపతే । చిన్తాం తీవ్రాం గత: శక్ర: కేన మే స్యాచ్ఛివం త్విహ ॥ ౫౯ ॥
nādhyagacchad vrata-cchidraṁ
[naadhyagachchad vrata-chchidram]
tat-paro ’tha mahī-pate
[tat-paro ’tha mahee-pate]
cintāṁ tīvrāṁ gataḥ śakraḥ
[chintaam teevraam gatah shakrah]
kena me syāc chivaṁ tv iha
[kena me syaach chivam tv iha]
na — not adhyagacchat — could find vrata-chidram — a fault in the execution of the vow tat-paraḥ — intent upon that atha — thereupon mahī-pate — O master of the world cintām — anxiety tīvrām — intense gataḥ — obtained śakraḥ — Indra kena — how me — my syāt — can there be śivam — well-being tu — then iha — here.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nādhyagacchad vrata-cchidraṁ
na
not
adhyagacchat
could find
vrata-chidram
a fault in the execution of the vow
tat-paro ’tha mahī-pate
tat-paraḥ
intent upon that
atha
thereupon
mahī-pate
O master of the world
cintāṁ tīvrāṁ gataḥ śakraḥ
cintām
anxiety
tīvrām
intense
gataḥ
obtained
śakraḥ
Indra
kena me syāc chivaṁ tv iha
kena
how
me
my
syāt
can there be
śivam
well-being
tu
then
iha
here.
O master of the entire world, when Indra could find no faults, he thought, “How will there be good fortune for me?” Thus he was full of deep anxiety.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O master of the entire world! When Indra could find no faults, he became intensely worried. He thought, "How will there be good fortune for me?"
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.60

↗
ఏకదా సా తు సన్ధ్యాయాముచ్ఛిష్టా వ్రతకర్శితా । అస్పృష్టవార్యధౌతాఙ్‌ఘ్రి: సుష్వాప విధిమోహితా ॥ ౬౦ ॥
ekadā sā tu sandhyāyām
[ekadaa saa tu sandhyaayaam]
ucchiṣṭā vrata-karśitā
[uchchishtaa vrata-karshitaa]
aspṛṣṭa-vāry-adhautāṅghriḥ
[asprishta-vaary-adhautaanghrih]
suṣvāpa vidhi-mohitā
[sushvaapa vidhi-mohitaa]
ekadā — once sā — she tu — but sandhyāyām — during the evening twilight ucchiṣṭā — just after eating vrata — from the vow karśitā — weak and thin aspṛṣṭa — not touched vāri — water adhauta — not washed aṅghriḥ — her feet suṣvāpa — went to sleep vidhi — by fate mohitā — bewildered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekadā sā tu sandhyāyām
ekadā
once
sā
she
tu
but
sandhyāyām
during the evening twilight
ucchiṣṭā vrata-karśitā
ucchiṣṭā
just after eating
vrata
from the vow
karśitā
weak and thin
aspṛṣṭa-vāry-adhautāṅghriḥ
aspṛṣṭa
not touched
vāri
water
adhauta
not washed
aṅghriḥ
her feet
suṣvāpa vidhi-mohitā
suṣvāpa
went to sleep
vidhi
by fate
mohitā
bewildered.
Having grown weak and thin because of strictly following the principles of the vow, Diti once unfortunately neglected to wash her mouth, hands and feet after eating and went to sleep during the evening twilight.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having grown thin because of strictly following the vow, Diti, forgetting the rules, once went to sleep after eating, without performing ācamana and without washing her feet, during the twilight. She did not perform ācamana or wash her feet.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.61

↗
లబ్ధ్వా తదన్తరం శక్రో నిద్రాపహృతచేతస: । దితే: ప్రవిష్ట ఉదరం యోగేశో యోగమాయయా ॥ ౬౧ ॥
labdhvā tad-antaraṁ śakro
[labdhvaa tad-antaram shakro]
nidrāpahṛta-cetasaḥ
[nidraapahrita-chetasah]
diteḥ praviṣṭa udaraṁ
[diteh pravishta udaram]
yogeśo yoga-māyayā
[yogesho yoga-maayayaa]
labdhvā — finding tat-antaram — after that śakraḥ — Indra nidrā — by sleep apahṛta-cetasaḥ — unconscious diteḥ — of Diti praviṣṭaḥ — entered udaram — the womb yoga-īśaḥ — the master of yoga yoga — of yogic perfections māyayā — by the power.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
labdhvā tad-antaraṁ śakro
labdhvā
finding
tat-antaram
after that
śakraḥ
Indra
nidrāpahṛta-cetasaḥ
nidrā
by sleep
apahṛta-cetasaḥ
unconscious
diteḥ praviṣṭa udaraṁ
diteḥ
of Diti
praviṣṭaḥ
entered
udaram
the womb
yogeśo yoga-māyayā
yoga-īśaḥ
the master of yoga
yoga
of yogic perfections
māyayā
by the power.
Finding this fault, Indra, who has all the mystic powers [the yoga-siddhis such as aṇimā and laghimā], entered Diti’s womb while she was unconscious, being fast asleep.

A perfectly successful yogī is expert in eight kinds of perfection. By one of them, called aṇimā-siddhi, he can become smaller than an atom, and in that state he can enter anywhere. With this yogic power, Indra entered the womb of Diti while she was pregnant.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Finding this fault, Indra, who is the master of yoga, entered Diti's womb while she was unconscious during sleep by his power of yoga. He entered by the power (māyayā) of yoga which allowed him to enter another’s body.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.62

↗
చకర్త సప్తధా గర్భం వజ్రేణ కనకప్రభమ్ । రుదన్తం సప్తధైకైకం మా రోదీరితి తాన్ పున: ॥ ౬౨ ॥
cakarta saptadhā garbhaṁ
[chakarta saptadhaa garbham]
vajreṇa kanaka-prabham
[vajrena kanaka-prabham]
rudantaṁ saptadhaikaikaṁ
[rudantam saptadhaikaikam]
mā rodīr iti tān punaḥ
[maa rodeer iti taan punah]
cakarta — he cut sapta-dhā — into seven pieces garbham — the embryo vajreṇa — by his thunderbolt kanaka — of gold prabham — which had the appearance rudantam — crying sapta-dhā — into seven pieces eka-ekam — each one mā rodīḥ — do not cry iti — thus tān — them punaḥ — again.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
cakarta saptadhā garbhaṁ
cakarta
he cut
sapta-dhā
into seven pieces
garbham
the embryo
vajreṇa kanaka-prabham
vajreṇa
by his thunderbolt
kanaka
of gold
prabham
which had the appearance
rudantaṁ saptadhaikaikaṁ
rudantam
crying
sapta-dhā
into seven pieces
eka-ekam
each one
mā rodīr iti tān punaḥ
mā rodīḥ
do not cry
iti
thus
tān
them
punaḥ
again.
After entering Diti’s womb, Indra, with the help of his thunderbolt, cut into seven pieces her embryo, which appeared like glowing gold. In seven places, seven different living beings began crying. Indra told them, “Do not cry,” and then he cut each of them into seven pieces again.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura remarks that Indra, by his yogic power, first expanded the body of the one Marut into seven, and then when he cut each of the seven parts of the original body into pieces, there were forty-nine. When each body was cut into seven, other living entities entered the new bodies, and thus they were like plants, which become separate entities when cut into various parts and planted on a hill. The first body was one, and when it was cut into many pieces, many other living entities entered the new bodies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra, with the help of his thunderbolt, cut into seven pieces her embryo, which glowed like gold, and which began to cry. Indra told them, "Do not cry," and then he cut each of them into seven pieces again. He said, “Do not cry” to comfort them. But then he cut them into seven more parts each. Some say that a single jīva can expand his body into forty-nine forms for a short time like a yogī or like someone else enjoying a lot of both piety and sin. Others say that knowing the future event, forty-nine jīvas entered into one body, and then entered each of the forty-nine parts when cut by Indra. Others say that forty-eight more jīvas entered each of the other parts the moment that Indra cut up the one fetus, just as separate jīvas enter each branch when a person cuts branches off a creeper or bush and plants them in the ground.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.63

↗
తమూచు: పాట్యమానాస్తే సర్వే ప్రాఞ్జలయో నృప । కిం న ఇన్ద్ర జిఘాంససి భ్రాతరో మరుతస్తవ ॥ ౬౩ ॥
tam ūcuḥ pāṭyamānās te
[tam oochuh paatyamaanaas te]
sarve prāṣjalayo nṛpa
[sarve praashjalayo nripa]
kiṁ na indra jighāṁsasi
[kim na indra jighaamsasi]
bhrātaro marutas tava
[bhraataro marutas tava]
tam — to him ūcuḥ — said pāṭyamānāḥ — being aggrieved te — they sarve — all prāṣjalayaḥ — with folded hands nṛpa — O King kim — why naḥ — us indra — O Indra jighāṁsasi — do you want to kill bhrātaraḥ — brothers marutaḥ — Maruts tava — your.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam ūcuḥ pāṭyamānās te
tam
to him
ūcuḥ
said
pāṭyamānāḥ
being aggrieved
te
they
sarve prāṣjalayo nṛpa
sarve
all
prāṣjalayaḥ
with folded hands
nṛpa
O King
kiṁ na indra jighāṁsasi
kim
why
naḥ
us
indra
O Indra
jighāṁsasi
do you want to kill
bhrātaro marutas tava
bhrātaraḥ
brothers
marutaḥ
Maruts
tava
your.
O King, being very much aggrieved, they pleaded to Indra with folded hands, saying, “Dear Indra, we are the Maruts, your brothers. Why are you trying to kill us?”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! The cut pieces pleaded to Indra with folded hands. "O Indra! Why are you are killing your brothers, the Maruts?"
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.64

↗
మా భైష్ట భ్రాతరో మహ్యం యూయమిత్యాహ కౌశిక: । అనన్యభావాన్ పార్షదానాత్మనో మరుతాం గణాన్ ॥ ౬౪ ॥
mā bhaiṣṭa bhrātaro mahyaṁ
[maa bhaishta bhraataro mahyam]
yūyam ity āha kauśikaḥ
[yooyam ity aaha kaushikah]
ananya-bhāvān pārṣadān
[ananya-bhaavaan paarshadaan]
ātmano marutāṁ gaṇān
[aatmano marutaam ganaan]
mā bhaiṣṭa — do not fear bhrātaraḥ — brothers mahyam — my yūyam — you iti — thus āha — said kauśikaḥ — Indra ananya-bhāvān — devoted pārṣadān — followers ātmanaḥ — his marutām gaṇān — the Maruts.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mā bhaiṣṭa bhrātaro mahyaṁ
mā bhaiṣṭa
do not fear
bhrātaraḥ
brothers
mahyam
my
yūyam ity āha kauśikaḥ
yūyam
you
iti
thus
āha
said
kauśikaḥ
Indra
ananya-bhāvān pārṣadān
ananya-bhāvān
devoted
pārṣadān
followers
ātmano marutāṁ gaṇān
ātmanaḥ
his
marutām gaṇān
the Maruts.
When Indra saw that actually they were his devoted followers, he said to them: If you are all my brothers, you have nothing more to fear from me.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra spoke to the group of Maruts, his devoted followers. “You are my brothers. Do not fear.” Mahyam here stands for mama. Kauśikaḥ is Indra. Śruti says saptagaṇā vai marutaḥ: there are seven groups of Maruts.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.65

↗
న మమార దితేర్గర్భ: శ్రీనివాసానుకమ్పయా । బహుధా కులిశక్షుణ్ణో ద్రౌణ్యస్త్రేణ యథా భవాన్ ॥ ౬౫ ॥
na mamāra diter garbhaḥ
[na mamaara diter garbhah]
śrīnivāsānukampayā
[shreenivaasaanukampayaa]
bahudhā kuliśa-kṣuṇṇo
[bahudhaa kulisha-kshunno]
drauṇy-astreṇa yathā bhavān
[drauny-astrena yathaa bhavaan]
na — not mamāra — died diteḥ — of Diti garbhaḥ — the embryo śrīnivāsa — of Lord Viṣṇu, the resting place of the goddess of fortune anukampayā — by the mercy bahu-dhā — into many pieces kuliśa — by the thunderbolt kṣuṇṇaḥ — cut drauṇi — of Aśvatthāmā astreṇa — by the weapon yathā — just as bhavān — you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na mamāra diter garbhaḥ
na
not
mamāra
died
diteḥ
of Diti
garbhaḥ
the embryo
śrīnivāsānukampayā
śrīnivāsa
of Lord Viṣṇu, the resting place of the goddess of fortune
anukampayā
by the mercy
bahudhā kuliśa-kṣuṇṇo
bahu-dhā
into many pieces
kuliśa
by the thunderbolt
kṣuṇṇaḥ
cut
drauṇy-astreṇa yathā bhavān
drauṇi
of Aśvatthāmā
astreṇa
by the weapon
yathā
just as
bhavān
you.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: My dear King Parīkṣit, you were burned by the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā, but when Lord Kṛṣṇa entered the womb of your mother, you were saved. Similarly, although the one embryo was cut into forty-nine pieces by the thunderbolt of Indra, they were all saved by the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as you, Parīkṣit, were burned by the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā but did not die, that one embryo which was cut into forty-nine pieces did not die by the mercy of the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.66-67

↗
సకృదిష్ట్వాదిపురుషం పురుషో యాతి సామ్యతామ్ । సంవత్సరం కిఞ్చిదూనం దిత్యా యద్ధరిరర్చిత: ॥ ౬౬ ॥ సజూరిన్ద్రేణ పఞ్చాశద్దేవాస్తే మరుతోఽభవన్ । వ్యపోహ్య మాతృదోషం తే హరిణా సోమపా: కృతా: ॥ ౬౭ ॥
sakṛd iṣṭvādi-puruṣaṁ
[sakrid ishtvaadi-purusham]
puruṣo yāti sāmyatām
[purusho yaati saamyataam]
saṁvatsaraṁ kiṣcid ūnaṁ
[samvatsaram kishchid oonam]
dityā yad dharir arcitaḥ
[dityaa yad dharir architah]
sajūr indreṇa paṣcāśad
[sajoor indrena pashchaashad]
devās te maruto ’bhavan
[devaas te maruto ’bhavan]
vyapohya mātṛ-doṣaṁ te
[vyapohya maatri-dosham te]
hariṇā soma-pāḥ kṛtāḥ
[harinaa soma-paah kritaah]
sakṛt — once iṣṭvā — worshiping ādi-puruṣam — the original person puruṣaḥ — a person yāti — goes to sāmyatām — possessing the same bodily feature as the Lord saṁvatsaram — a year kiṣcit ūnam — a little less than dityā — by Diti yat — because hariḥ — Lord Hari arcitaḥ — was worshiped sajūḥ — with indreṇa — Indra paṣcāśat — fifty devāḥ — demigods te — they marutaḥ — the Maruts abhavan — became vyapohya — removing mātṛ-doṣam — the fault of their mother te — they hariṇā — by Lord Hari soma-pāḥ — drinkers of soma-rasa kṛtāḥ — were made.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sakṛd iṣṭvādi-puruṣaṁ
sakṛt
once
iṣṭvā
worshiping
ādi-puruṣam
the original person
puruṣaḥ
a person
puruṣo yāti sāmyatām
yāti
goes to
sāmyatām
possessing the same bodily feature as the Lord
saṁvatsaraṁ kiṣcid ūnaṁ
saṁvatsaram
a year
kiṣcit ūnam
a little less than
dityā yad dharir arcitaḥ
dityā
by Diti
yat
because
hariḥ
Lord Hari
arcitaḥ
was worshiped
sajūr indreṇa paṣcāśad
sajūḥ
with
indreṇa
Indra
paṣcāśat
fifty
devās te maruto ’bhavan
devāḥ
demigods
te
they
marutaḥ
the Maruts
abhavan
became
vyapohya mātṛ-doṣaṁ te
vyapohya
removing
mātṛ-doṣam
the fault of their mother
te
they
hariṇā soma-pāḥ kṛtāḥ
hariṇā
by Lord Hari
soma-pāḥ
drinkers of soma-rasa
kṛtāḥ
were made.
If one worships the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the original person, even once, he receives the benefit of being promoted to the spiritual world and possessing the same bodily features as Viṣṇu. Diti worshiped Lord Viṣṇu for almost one year, adhering to a great vow. Because of such strength in spiritual life, the forty-nine Maruts were born. How, then, is it wonderful that the Maruts, although born from the womb of Diti, became equal to the demigods by the mercy of the Supreme Lord?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If one worships the Supreme Lord even once, he attains the same bodily features as Viṣṇu. Because Diti worshiped Lord Viṣṇu for almost one year, the forty-nine Maruts became fifty devatās along with Indra. Viṣṇu removed the fault of their mother, and they became drinkers of soma. Sāmyatām means “attaining similar human form.” Sajūḥ means “with.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.68

↗
దితిరుత్థాయ దద‍ృశే కుమారాననలప్రభాన్ । ఇన్ద్రేణ సహితాన్ దేవీ పర్యతుష్యదనిన్దితా ॥ ౬౮ ॥
ditir utthāya dadṛśe
[ditir utthaaya dadrishe]
kumārān anala-prabhān
[kumaaraan anala-prabhaan]
indreṇa sahitān devī
[indrena sahitaan devee]
paryatuṣyad aninditā
[paryatushyad aninditaa]
ditiḥ — Diti utthāya — getting up dadṛśe — saw kumārān — children anala-prabhān — as brilliant as fire indreṇa sahitān — with Indra devī — the goddess paryatuṣyat — was pleased aninditā — being purified.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ditir utthāya dadṛśe
ditiḥ
Diti
utthāya
getting up
dadṛśe
saw
kumārān anala-prabhān
kumārān
children
anala-prabhān
as brilliant as fire
indreṇa sahitān devī
indreṇa sahitān
with Indra
devī
the goddess
paryatuṣyad aninditā
paryatuṣyat
was pleased
aninditā
being purified.
Because of worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Diti was completely purified. When she got up from bed, she saw her forty-nine sons along with Indra. These forty-nine sons were all as brilliant as fire and were in friendship with Indra, and therefore she was very pleased.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When she got up from bed, Diti, purified, saw her forty-nine sons, brilliant as fire, along with Indra. She was pleased.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.69

↗
అథేన్ద్రమాహ తాతాహమాదిత్యానాం భయావహమ్ । అపత్యమిచ్ఛన్త్యచరం వ్రతమేతత్సుదుష్కరమ్ ॥ ౬౯ ॥
athendram āha tātāham
[athendram aaha taataaham]
ādityānāṁ bhayāvaham
[aadityaanaam bhayaavaham]
apatyam icchanty acaraṁ
[apatyam ichchanty acharam]
vratam etat suduṣkaram
[vratam etat sudushkaram]
atha — thereafter indram — to Indra āha — spoke tāta — dear one aham — I ādityānām — to the Ādityas bhaya-āvaham — fearful apatyam — a son icchantī — desiring acaram — executed vratam — vow etat — this su-duṣkaram — very difficult to perform.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
athendram āha tātāham
atha
thereafter
indram
to Indra
āha
spoke
tāta
dear one
aham
I
ādityānāṁ bhayāvaham
ādityānām
to the Ādityas
bhaya-āvaham
fearful
apatyam icchanty acaraṁ
apatyam
a son
icchantī
desiring
acaram
executed
vratam etat suduṣkaram
vratam
vow
etat
this
su-duṣkaram
very difficult to perform.
Thereafter, Diti said to Indra: My dear son, I adhered to this difficult vow just to get a son to kill you twelve Ādityas.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, Diti said to Indra: My dear son, I adhered to this difficult vow with the desire for a son to be feared by you twelve Ādityas.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.70

↗
ఏక: సఙ్కల్పిత: పుత్ర: సప్త సప్తాభవన్ కథమ్ । యది తే విదితం పుత్ర సత్యం కథయ మా మృషా ॥ ౭౦ ॥
ekaḥ saṅkalpitaḥ putraḥ
[ekah sankalpitah putrah]
sapta saptābhavan katham
[sapta saptaabhavan katham]
yadi te viditaṁ putra
[yadi te viditam putra]
satyaṁ kathaya mā mṛṣā
[satyam kathaya maa mrishaa]
ekaḥ — one saṅkalpitaḥ — was prayed for putraḥ — son sapta sapta — forty-nine abhavan — came to be katham — how yadi — if te — by you viditam — known putra — my dear son satyam — the truth kathaya — speak mā — do not (speak) mṛṣā — lies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekaḥ saṅkalpitaḥ putraḥ
ekaḥ
one
saṅkalpitaḥ
was prayed for
putraḥ
son
sapta saptābhavan katham
sapta sapta
forty-nine
abhavan
came to be
katham
how
yadi te viditaṁ putra
yadi
if
te
by you
viditam
known
putra
my dear son
satyaṁ kathaya mā mṛṣā
satyam
the truth
kathaya
speak
mā
do not (speak)
mṛṣā
lies.
I prayed for only one son, but now I see that there are forty-nine. How has this happened? My dear son Indra, if you know, please tell me the truth. Do not try to speak lies.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I prayed for only one son, who has become forty-nine sons. How has this happened? O my son Indra! If you know how this has happened, please tell me. Do not speak lies.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.71

↗
ఇన్ద్ర ఉవాచ అమ్బ తేఽహం వ్యవసితముపధార్యాగతోఽన్తికమ్ । లబ్ధాన్తరోఽచ్ఛిదం గర్భమర్థబుద్ధిర్న ధర్మద‍ృక్ ॥ ౭౧ ॥
indra uvāca
[indra uvaacha]
amba te ’haṁ vyavasitam
[amba te ’ham vyavasitam]
upadhāryāgato ’ntikam
[upadhaaryaagato ’ntikam]
labdhāntaro ’cchidaṁ garbham
[labdhaantaro ’chchidam garbham]
artha-buddhir na dharma-dṛk
[artha-buddhir na dharma-drik]
indraḥ uvāca — Indra said amba — O mother te — your aham — I vyavasitam — vow upadhārya — understanding āgataḥ — came antikam — nearby labdha — having found antaraḥ — a fault acchidam — I cut garbham — the embryo artha-buddhiḥ — being self-interested na — not dharma-dṛk — possessing vision of religion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
indra uvāca
indraḥ uvāca
Indra said
amba te ’haṁ vyavasitam
amba
O mother
te
your
aham
I
vyavasitam
vow
upadhāryāgato ’ntikam
upadhārya
understanding
āgataḥ
came
labdhāntaro ’cchidaṁ garbham
antikam
nearby
labdha
having found
antaraḥ
a fault
acchidam
I cut
garbham
the embryo
artha-buddhir na dharma-dṛk
artha-buddhiḥ
being self-interested
na
not
dharma-dṛk
possessing vision of religion.
Indra replied: My dear mother, because I was grossly blinded by selfish interests, I lost sight of religion. When I understood that you were observing a great vow in spiritual life, I wanted to find some fault in you. When I found such a fault, I entered your womb and cut the embryo to pieces.

When Diti, Indra’s aunt, explained to Indra without reservations what she had wanted to do, Indra explained his intentions to her. Thus both of them, instead of being enemies, freely spoke the truth. This is the qualification that results from contact with Viṣṇu. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (5.18.12) :

yasyāsti bhaktir bhagavaty akiṣcanā sarvair guṇais tatra samāsate surāḥ

If one develops a devotional attitude and becomes purified by worshiping the Supreme Lord, all the good qualities are certainly manifested in his body. Because of being touched by worship of Viṣṇu, both Diti and Indra were purified.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra said: O mother! Understanding your vow, in my own interests, I was situated nearby, and, finding a fault, I cut the embryo up, not thinking of what was proper conduct. When Diti spoke truthfully, Indra also spoke truthfully. Labdhāntaraḥ means “finding a fault.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.72

↗
కృత్తో మే సప్తధా గర్భ ఆసన్ సప్త కుమారకా: । తేఽపి చైకైకశో వృక్ణా: సప్తధా నాపి మమ్రిరే ॥ ౭౨ ॥
kṛtto me saptadhā garbha
[kritto me saptadhaa garbha]
āsan sapta kumārakāḥ
[aasan sapta kumaarakaah]
te ’pi caikaikaśo vṛkṇāḥ
[te ’pi chaikaikasho vriknaah]
saptadhā nāpi mamrire
[saptadhaa naapi mamrire]
kṛttaḥ — cut me — by me sapta-dhā — into seven garbhaḥ — the embryo āsan — there came to be sapta — seven kumārakāḥ — babies te — they api — although ca — also eka-ekaśaḥ — each one vṛkṇāḥ — cut sapta-dhā — into seven na — not api — still mamrire — died.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛtto me saptadhā garbha
kṛttaḥ
cut
me
by me
sapta-dhā
into seven
garbhaḥ
the embryo
āsan sapta kumārakāḥ
āsan
there came to be
sapta
seven
kumārakāḥ
babies
te ’pi caikaikaśo vṛkṇāḥ
te
they
saptadhā nāpi mamrire
api
although
ca
also
eka-ekaśaḥ
each one
vṛkṇāḥ
cut
sapta-dhā
into seven
na
not
api
still
mamrire
died.
First I cut the child in the womb into seven pieces, which became seven children. Then I cut each of the children into seven pieces again. By the grace of the Supreme Lord, however, none of them died.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
First I cut the child in the womb into seven pieces, which became seven children. Then I cut each of the children into seven pieces again, but they did not die.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.73

↗
తతస్తత్పరమాశ్చర్యం వీక్ష్య వ్యవసితం మయా । మహాపురుషపూజాయా: సిద్ధి: కాప్యానుషఙ్గిణీ ॥ ౭౩ ॥
tatas tat paramāścaryaṁ
[tatas tat paramaashcharyam]
vīkṣya vyavasitaṁ mayā
[veekshya vyavasitam mayaa]
mahāpuruṣa-pūjāyāḥ
[mahaapurusha-poojaayaah]
siddhiḥ kāpy ānuṣaṅgiṇī
[siddhih kaapy aanushanginee]
tataḥ — then tat — that parama-āścaryam — great wonder vīkṣya — seeing vyavasitam — it was decided mayā — by me mahā-puruṣa — of Lord Viṣṇu pūjāyāḥ — of worship siddhiḥ — result kāpi — some ānuṣaṅgiṇī — secondary.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatas tat paramāścaryaṁ
tataḥ
then
tat
that
parama-āścaryam
great wonder
vīkṣya vyavasitaṁ mayā
vīkṣya
seeing
vyavasitam
it was decided
mayā
by me
mahāpuruṣa-pūjāyāḥ
mahā-puruṣa
of Lord Viṣṇu
pūjāyāḥ
of worship
siddhiḥ kāpy ānuṣaṅgiṇī
siddhiḥ
result
kāpi
some
ānuṣaṅgiṇī
secondary.
My dear mother, when I saw that all forty-nine sons were alive, I was certainly struck with wonder. I decided that this was a secondary result of your having regularly executed devotional service in worship of Lord Viṣṇu.

For one who engages in worshiping Lord Viṣṇu, nothing is very wonderful. This is a fact. In Bhagavad-gītā (18.78) it is said:

yatra yogeśvaraḥ kṛṣṇo yatra pārtho dhanur-dharaḥ tatra śrīr vijayo bhūtir dhruvā nītir matir mama

“Wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, the master of all mystics, and wherever there is Arjuna, the supreme archer, there will also certainly be opulence, victory, extraordinary power, and morality. That is my opinion.” Yogeśvara is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all mystic yoga, who can do anything and everything He likes. This is the omnipotence of the Supreme Lord. For one who pleases the Supreme Lord, no achievement is wonderful. Everything is possible for him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing that great wonder, I discerned the truth. Even liberation is a mere secondary result of worship of Lord Viṣṇu. Vyavastiam means “I determined.” Two and half verses explain about Viṣṇu worship. Liberation (siddhiḥ) is a secondary result of the worship.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.74

↗
ఆరాధనం భగవత ఈహమానా నిరాశిష: । యే తు నేచ్ఛన్త్యపి పరం తే స్వార్థకుశలా: స్మృతా: ॥ ౭౪ ॥
ārādhanaṁ bhagavata
[aaraadhanam bhagavata]
īhamānā nirāśiṣaḥ
[eehamaanaa niraashishah]
ye tu necchanty api paraṁ
[ye tu nechchanty api param]
te svārtha-kuśalāḥ smṛtāḥ
[te svaartha-kushalaah smritaah]
ārādhanam — the worship bhagavataḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead īhamānāḥ — being interested in nirāśiṣaḥ — without material desires ye — those who tu — indeed na icchanti — do not desire api — even param — liberation te — they sva-artha — in their own interest kuśalāḥ — expert smṛtāḥ — are considered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ārādhanaṁ bhagavata
ārādhanam
the worship
bhagavataḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
īhamānā nirāśiṣaḥ
īhamānāḥ
being interested in
nirāśiṣaḥ
without material desires
ye tu necchanty api paraṁ
ye
those who
tu
indeed
na icchanti
do not desire
api
even
param
liberation
te svārtha-kuśalāḥ smṛtāḥ
te
they
sva-artha
in their own interest
kuśalāḥ
expert
smṛtāḥ
are considered.
Although those who are interested only in worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead do not desire anything material from the Lord and do not even want liberation, Lord Kṛṣṇa fulfills all their desires.

When Dhruva Mahārāja saw Lord Viṣṇu, he declined to take any benedictions from Him, for he was fully satisfied by seeing the Lord. Nonetheless, the Lord is so kind that because Dhruva Mahārāja, in the beginning, had desired a kingdom greater than his father’s, he was promoted to Dhruvaloka, the best planet in the universe. Therefore in the śāstra it is said:

akāmaḥ sarva-kāmo vā mokṣa-kāma udāra-dhīḥ tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena yajeta puruṣaṁ param

“A person who has broader intelligence, whether he is full of material desires, free from material desires, or desiring liberation, must by all means worship the supreme whole, the Personality of Godhead.” ( Bhāg. 2.3.10 ) One should engage in full devotional service. Then, even though he has no desires, whatever desires he previously had can all be fulfilled simply by his worship of the Lord. The actual devotee does not desire even liberation ( anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyam ). The Lord, however, fulfills the desire of the devotee by awarding him opulence that will never be destroyed. A karmī’s opulence is destroyed, but the opulence of a devotee is never destroyed. A devotee becomes more and more opulent as he increases his devotional service to the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Those who, desiring only worship of the Supreme Lord and being without material desires, do not even want liberation, are considered expert in understanding their highest benefit. Param means liberation. Those who desire liberation are ignorant of their own interests, desiring grass instead of the great treasure available. Because of the presence of the six great qualities in the Lord present before them, those who desire worship of the Lord are considered successful. It is said: satyaṁ diśaty arthitam arthito nṛṇāṁ naivārthado yat punar arthitā yataḥ svayaṁ vidhatte bhajatām anicchatām icchāpidhānaṁ nija-pāda-pallavam The Lord certainly gives desired objects to devotees who request them, but he does not give in such a way that the devotee will ask again after finishing his enjoyment. He gives his lotus feet, which include all desirables, to those worshippers who do not desire material benefits. SB 5.19.27
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.75

↗
ఆరాధ్యాత్మప్రదం దేవం స్వాత్మానం జగదీశ్వరమ్ । కో వృణీత గుణస్పర్శం బుధ: స్యాన్నరకేఽపి యత్ ॥ ౭౫ ॥
ārādhyātma-pradaṁ devaṁ
[aaraadhyaatma-pradam devam]
svātmānaṁ jagad-īśvaram
[svaatmaanam jagad-eeshvaram]
ko vṛṇīta guṇa-sparśaṁ
[ko vrineeta guna-sparsham]
budhaḥ syān narake ’pi yat
[budhah syaan narake ’pi yat]
ārādhya — after worshiping ātma-pradam — who gives Himself devam — the Lord sva-ātmānam — the most dear jagat-īśvaram — the Lord of the universe kaḥ — what vṛṇīta — would choose guṇa-sparśam — material happiness budhaḥ — intelligent person syāt — is narake — in hell api — even yat — which.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ārādhyātma-pradaṁ devaṁ
ārādhya
after worshiping
ātma-pradam
who gives Himself
devam
the Lord
svātmānaṁ jagad-īśvaram
sva-ātmānam
the most dear
jagat-īśvaram
the Lord of the universe
kaḥ
what
ko vṛṇīta guṇa-sparśaṁ
vṛṇīta
would choose
guṇa-sparśam
material happiness
budhaḥ syān narake ’pi yat
budhaḥ
intelligent person
syāt
is
narake
in hell
api
even
yat
which.
The ultimate goal of all ambitions is to become a servant of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If an intelligent man serves the most dear Lord, who gives Himself to His devotees, how can he desire material happiness, which is available even in hell?

An intelligent man will never aspire to become a devotee to achieve material happiness. That is the test of a devotee. As Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu teaches:

na dhanaṁ na janaṁ na sundarīṁ kavitāṁ vā jagad-īśa kāmaye mama janmani janmanīśvare bhavatād bhaktir ahaitukī tvayi

“O almighty Lord, I have no desire to accumulate wealth, nor do I desire beautiful women, nor do I want any number of followers. I only want Your causeless devotional service birth after birth.” A pure devotee never begs the Lord for material happiness in the shape of riches, followers, a good wife or even mukti. The Lord promises, however, yoga-kṣemaṁ vahāmy aham: “I voluntarily bring everything necessary for My service.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What intelligent person, having worshipped the Lord of the universe, who is the performer of pastimes, having worshipped the Lord with a beautiful form who gives himself to the devotee, would accept material happiness, which is available in hell? Devam here means “the Lord who is absorbed in pastimes.” Svātmānam (su ātmānam) means “beautiful form.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.76

↗
తదిదం మమ దౌర్జన్యం బాలిశస్య మహీయసి । క్షన్తుమర్హసి మాతస్త్వం దిష్ట్యా గర్భో మృతోత్థిత: ॥ ౭౬ ॥
tad idaṁ mama daurjanyaṁ
[tad idam mama daurjanyam]
bāliśasya mahīyasi
[baalishasya maheeyasi]
kṣantum arhasi mātas tvaṁ
[kshantum arhasi maatas tvam]
diṣṭyā garbho mṛtotthitaḥ
[dishtyaa garbho mritotthitah]
tat — that idam — this mama — of me daurjanyam — evil deed bāliśasya — a fool mahīyasi — O best of women kṣantum arhasi — please excuse mātaḥ — O mother tvam — you diṣṭyā — by fortune garbhaḥ — the child within the womb mṛta — killed utthitaḥ — became alive.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad idaṁ mama daurjanyaṁ
tat
that
idam
this
mama
of me
daurjanyam
evil deed
bāliśasya mahīyasi
bāliśasya
a fool
mahīyasi
O best of women
kṣantum arhasi mātas tvaṁ
kṣantum arhasi
please excuse
mātaḥ
O mother
tvam
you
diṣṭyā garbho mṛtotthitaḥ
diṣṭyā
by fortune
garbhaḥ
the child within the womb
mṛta
killed
utthitaḥ
became alive.
O my mother, O best of all women, I am a fool. Kindly excuse me for whatever offenses I have committed. Your forty-nine sons have been born unhurt because of your devotional service. As an enemy, I cut them to pieces, but because of your great devotional service they did not die.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O mother! O best of all women! I am a fool. Kindly excuse me for my sinful deed. The dead embryo has become alive by good fortune.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.77

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ ఇన్ద్రస్తయాభ్యనుజ్ఞాత: శుద్ధభావేన తుష్టయా । మరుద్భ‍ి: సహ తాం నత్వా జగామ త్రిదివం ప్రభు: ॥ ౭౭ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
indras tayābhyanujṣātaḥ
[indras tayaabhyanujshaatah]
śuddha-bhāvena tuṣṭayā
[shuddha-bhaavena tushtayaa]
marudbhiḥ saha tāṁ natvā
[marudbhih saha taam natvaa]
jagāma tri-divaṁ prabhuḥ
[jagaama tri-divam prabhuh]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said indraḥ — Indra tayā — by her abhyanujṣātaḥ — being permitted śuddha-bhāvena — by the good behavior tuṣṭayā — satisfied marudbhiḥ saha — with the Maruts tām — to her natvā — having offered obeisances jagāma — he went tri-divam — to the heavenly planets prabhuḥ — the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
indras tayābhyanujṣātaḥ
indraḥ
Indra
tayā
by her
abhyanujṣātaḥ
being permitted
śuddha-bhāvena tuṣṭayā
śuddha-bhāvena
by the good behavior
tuṣṭayā
satisfied
marudbhiḥ saha tāṁ natvā
marudbhiḥ saha
with the Maruts
tām
to her
natvā
having offered obeisances
jagāma tri-divaṁ prabhuḥ
jagāma
he went
tri-divam
to the heavenly planets
prabhuḥ
the Lord.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: Diti was extremely satisfied by Indra’s good behavior. Then Indra offered his respects to his aunt with profuse obeisances, and with her permission he went away to the heavenly planets with his brothers the Maruts.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Taking permission of Diti, who was satisfied by his good behavior, Indra offered his respects to her and left for the heavenly planets with his brothers the Maruts.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.18.78

↗
ఏవం తే సర్వమాఖ్యాతం యన్మాం త్వం పరిపృచ్ఛసి । మఙ్గలం మరుతాం జన్మ కిం భూయ: కథయామి తే ॥ ౭౮ ॥
evaṁ te sarvam ākhyātaṁ
[evam te sarvam aakhyaatam]
yan māṁ tvaṁ paripṛcchasi
[yan maam tvam pariprichchasi]
maṅgalaṁ marutāṁ janma
[mangalam marutaam janma]
kiṁ bhūyaḥ kathayāmi te
[kim bhooyah kathayaami te]
evam — thus te — to you sarvam — all ākhyātam — narrated yat — which mām — me tvam — you paripṛcchasi — asked maṅgalam — auspicious marutām — of the Maruts janma — the birth kim — what bhūyaḥ — further kathayāmi — shall I speak te — to you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ te sarvam ākhyātaṁ
evam
thus
te
to you
sarvam
all
ākhyātam
narrated
yan māṁ tvaṁ paripṛcchasi
yat
which
mām
me
tvam
you
paripṛcchasi
asked
maṅgalaṁ marutāṁ janma
maṅgalam
auspicious
marutām
of the Maruts
janma
the birth
kiṁ bhūyaḥ kathayāmi te
kim
what
bhūyaḥ
further
kathayāmi
shall I speak
te
to you.
My dear King Parīkṣit, I have replied as far as possible to the questions you have asked me, especially in regard to this pure, auspicious narration about the Maruts. Now you may inquire further, and I shall explain more.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports to the Sixth Canto, Eighteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Diti Vows to Kill King Indra.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I have replied to the questions you have asked me, in regard to the auspicious birth of the Maruts. What else should I explain? Thus ends the commentary on the Eighteenth Chapter of the Sixth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Nineteen The Puṁsavana Vow 6.19: Performing the Puṁsavana Ritualistic Ceremony 19. Performing the Puṁsavana Ritualistic Ceremony 6.19 Summary This chapter explains how Diti, Kaśyapa Muni's wife, executed Kaśyapa Muni's instructions on devotional service. During the first day of the bright fortnight of the moon in the month of Agrahāyaṇa (November-December), every woman, following in the footsteps of Diti and following the instructions of her own husband, should begin this puṁsavana-vrata. In the morning, after washing her teeth, bathing and thus becoming purified, she should hear about the birth mystery of the Maruts. Then, covering her body with a white dress and being properly ornamented, before breakfast she should worship Lord Viṣṇu and mother Lakṣmī, the goddess of fortune, Lord Viṣṇu's wife, by glorifying Lord Viṣṇu for His mercy, patience, prowess, ability, greatness and other glories and for how He can bestow all mystic benedictions. While offering the Lord all paraphernalia for worship, such as ornaments, a sacred thread, scents, nice flowers, incense and water for bathing and washing His feet, hands and mouth, one should invite the Lord with this mantra: oṁ namo bhagavate mahā-puruṣāya mahānubhāvāya mahāvibhūtipataye saha mahā-vibhūtibhir balim upaharāmi. Then one should offer twelve oblations in the fire while chanting this mantra: oṁ namo bhagavate mahā-puruṣāya mahāvibhūti-pataye svāhā. One should offer obeisances while chanting this mantra ten times. Then one should chant the Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa mantra. If either a pregnant woman or her husband regularly discharges this devotional service, both of them will receive the result. After continuing this process for one full year, the chaste wife should fast on the pūrṇimā, the full-moon day, of Kārttika. On the following day, the husband should worship the Lord as before and then observe a festival by cooking nice food and distributing prasāda to the brāhmaṇas. Then, with the permission of the brāhmaṇas, the husband and wife should take prasāda. This chapter ends by glorifying the results of the puṁsavana function.
📝 My note