FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

1.5 · Nārada's Instructions on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for Vyāsadeva

40 verses
S Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15476 chars)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The opening chapters of Srimad-Bhagavatam describe its uniqueness, background, primary contents and ultimate purpose. Before diving into this ocean of spiritual wisdom, we’re made aware of our great fortune in contacting this priceless scripture. Srimad-Bhagavatam invites us into Krishna’s world of unlimited possibility. It teaches us how to nourish the spirit, a transcendental endeavour which is founded upon the process of attentive hearing. By such aural reception, the heart is cleansed, our original consciousness is reawakened and we find what we have always been looking for.

Previous S.L.A.P Next Glorious Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The opening chapters of Srimad-Bhagavatam describe its uniqueness, background, primary contents and ultimate purpose. Before diving into this ocean of spiritual wisdom, we’re made aware of our great fortune in contacting this priceless scripture. Srimad-Bhagavatam invites us into Krishna’s world of unlimited possibility. It teaches us how to nourish the spirit, a transcendental endeavour which is founded upon the process of attentive hearing. By such aural reception, the heart is cleansed, our original consciousness is reawakened and we find what we have always been looking for.

Previous S.L.A.P Next Glorious Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Compilation of Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Compilation of Bhagavatam Chapter 4, 5, 6 Suta Goswami begins by addressing the first question regarding the compilation of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Once, whilst Srila Vyasadeva was deep in meditation, he envisioned the bleak future of civilisation. Moved by compassion, he resolved to make the spiritual truths more accessible for the mass of people. He divided the original Veda into four, compiled the fifth Veda consisting of ancient histories, and entrusted each division of literature to various sages for preservation, development and further dissemination. Despite producing so many volumes of books, Vyasadeva remained dissatisfied. When Narada Muni arrived at his hermitage in Badarikasrama, he immediately diagnosed the problem and instructed Vyasadeva to compile a literature which would beautifully highlight the identity and activities of Lord Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Narada informed him that his previous works had obscured this most essential revelation; so much was discussed, but the essence was overlooked. To highlight the power of hearing about Krishna, Narada Muni described how, through the association of great saints, he progressed in devotional service. The transformation took place by serving and hearing from spiritually evolved souls with the proper eagerness and humility. Being further questioned by Vyasadeva, Narada Muni explained his previous life as the son of a maidservant, how his mother died, his subsequent meeting with the Supersoul, and his current birth as a wandering sage. Narada clearly possessed the depth of realisation required to guide his disciple towards spiritual perfection. Having received these jewel-like instructions, Vyasadeva went into a divine trance and perfectly grasped all the spiritual conclusions. He subsequently compiled the Srimad-Bhagavatam and taught it to his son, Sukadeva Goswami.

Previous History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Next Ripened fruit Last updated 1 year ago

Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Chapter 1, 2, 3 At the sacred forest of Naimisaranya, located in present-day northern India, 88,000 sages had gathered. Headed by Saunaka Rishi, their noble purpose was to perform a one-thousand-year sacrifice for the spiritual well-being of mankind. Seeing the divine calibre and spotless character of Suta Goswami, the sages place six crucial enquiries before him. This exchange of questions and answers unveils essential spiritual truths for the benefit of countless generations to come [ 1 ].

“What is the ultimate good for humanity?” When living beings free themselves from selfish material desires, engage in unmotivated and uninterrupted service to Krishna, and thus develop pure love for Him, they truly satisfy their innermost yearning.

“What is the essence of all scriptural knowledge?” The understanding that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and that we should reestablish our lost relationship with Him through devotional service ( bhakti ).

“Why did Krishna appear in this world?” To protect and uplift those of saintly disposition, and to attract all other living entities to re-enter the spiritual world.

“What were the activities of the Lord in relation to creation?” After generating the entire material substance, the Lord facilitated the creative process by expanding as the various Vishnu incarnations, thus providing a stage for living entities to live separately from God.

“What were the activities of each incarnation of the Lord?” The various forms of the Lord descend from the spiritual world to the material world for different purposes, and Krishna is the original source of them all (twenty-two such incarnations are described).

“When Krishna departs from the world, where will religious principles be found?” Though religiosity ( dharma ) and knowledge ( jnana ) depart with Krishna when He leaves the material world, those living in the subsequent age of darkness can illuminate their lives by reading Srimad-Bhagavatam.

Suta Goswami thus highlights the compelling power of hearing Srimad- Bhagavatam. One who receives it with open ears and an open heart, is gifted with a profound understanding of Bhagavan (the Supreme Lord) and the process of bhakti (devotional service to Him), and simultaneously experiences a purification of heart that raises one to the platform of pure devotion.

Previous Glorious Bhagavatam Next The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Last updated 1 year ago

Glorious Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Glorious Bhagavatam Chapter 1 We want happiness, but first we must know who we are. To understand ourselves, we must identify our origin. When the sun rises, we automatically see ourselves – similarly, when we find God, we discover our true self. That’s why this book is so exceptional. Srila Vyasadeva, the great sage and author of Srimad-Bhagavatam, first brings our attention to Lord Krishna. He is the source of everything, the director of the material cosmos and the superlative enjoyer in His own abode. Through the teachings of Srimad-Bhagavatam, one can capture Krishna within the heart. The purity of this book is unparalleled since it sidelines all materialistic ideas, uproots all miseries and clearly distinguishes reality from illusion. Srila Vyasadeva, a literary giant, compiled it at the summit of his spiritual maturity, and it’s so comprehensive that nothing else is needed to achieve perfection. It is the mature fruit of the tree of Vedic knowledge, crystallising the essence of all wisdom. The author invites the reader to relish this masterpiece, which will surely trigger a revolution of consciousness within the individual, and indeed society at large.

Previous S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Next Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Last updated 1 year ago

History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Chapter 3, 4 Suta Goswami goes on to describe how he received the teachings of Srimad- Bhagavatam. Srila Vyasadeva had previously instructed Sukadeva Goswami, his son, in this spiritual science. Then, in a historic conversation, Sukadeva Goswami spoke it to Maharaja Pariksit, the saintly king who was cursed to die in seven days. Suta Goswami heard that recital and was now imparting the very same knowledge to the sages of Naimisaranya. Having received enlightening answers to their first six questions, the sages posed a further four questions surrounding the history of Srimad-Bhagavatam. The answers to those four questions extend to the end of Canto One [2] :

Why, when and where was Srimad-Bhagavatam compiled?

How was Sukadeva Goswami viewed by others and how did his meeting with Maharaja Pariksit transpire?

How was Maharaja Pariksit born and what were his activities?

Why did Maharaja Pariksit renounce everything and travel to the bank of the Ganges?

Previous The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Next Compilation of Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Ripened fruit

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Ripened fruit “The Personality of Godhead Sri Krishna appeared before us just a little prior to the beginning of Kali-yuga, and He returned to His eternal home practically at the commencement of Kali-yuga. While He was present, He exhibited everything by His different activities. He spoke the Bhagavad-gita specifically and eradicated all pretentious principles of religiosity. And prior to His departure from this material world, He empowered Sri Vyasadeva through Narada to compile the messages of the Srimad-Bhagavatam, and thus both the Bhagavad-gita and the Srimad-Bhagavatam are like torchbearers for the blind people of this age. In other words, if men in this age of Kali want to see the real light of life, they must take to these two books only, and their aim of life will be fulfilled. Bhagavad-gita is the preliminary study of the Bhagavatam. And Srimad-Bhagavatam is the summum bonum of life, Lord Sri Krishna personified. We must therefore accept Srimad-Bhagavatam as the direct representation of Lord Krishna. One who can see Srimad-Bhagavatam can see also Lord Sri Krishna in person. They are identical.” ( SB 1.3.43 ). Vyasadeva appeared in this world with the sole mission of educating the masses in transcendental knowledge. Seeing that the Vedic mantras had become unclear and confusing, he divided the one Veda into four separate works, and also compiled the fifth Veda (historical stories) to give further insight and information. These divisions were given to various sages who, under Vyasadeva’s guidance, elaborated upon them and produced voluminous texts, still very difficult for the layman to understand and apply. The various viewpoints expressed were also difficult to reconcile. Thus, Vyasadeva decided to harmonise the diversity by shrinking the thousands of millions of Vedic verses into a single book of concise codes known as the Vedanta-Sutra. After completing this work, he still felt it too ambiguous and complex for most people to understand, and thus attempted to communicate the same teachings in story-format through the epic history of India known as the Mahabharata. Despite these mammoth endeavours Vyasadeva remained dissatisfied, concerned that the essence had not yet come to the forefront. Enter Narada Muni, who expertly diagnosed the root cause of the author’s disenchantment. Srila Vyasadeva’s writings had stressed the preliminary (and often materialistic) goals of religion – dharma (piety), artha (economic development), kama (sense gratification) and moksa (release from suffering). The travelling mendicant explained how Vyasadeva had inadvertently misled people, failing to glorify the Supreme Lord and highlight His name, fame, pastimes and glories. Having received this wise counsel, Vyasadeva went on to compose the Srimad-Bhagavatam, which magnified and zeroed in on the essence of the Vedas: pure, untainted, loving devotion to Lord Krishna. At last, Vyasadeva felt satisfied in his endeavour to provide the light of knowledge to the lost souls of Kali-yuga, the current cosmic age of degradation. Srimad- Bhagavatam, the spotless ( amala ) Purana, would indeed be the saving grace in the impending dark times, clearly establishing the goal of life and the true source of unlimited happiness in no uncertain terms. Having compiled Srimad-Bhagavatam, Vyasadeva taught the contents to his son, Sukadeva Goswami. When he was born, Sukadeva Goswami immediately left home, fearful of potential material influences. Vyasadeva arranged to lure him back by having beautiful verses of the Srimad-Bhagavatam recited within his earshot. Sukadeva Goswami was indeed attracted to return, and subsequently heard the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam from his father. Later, Sukadeva Goswami met Maharaja Pariksit and narrated the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam to him in seven days. During that discourse, Vyasadeva and Suta Goswami were both present. Having grasped the entire narration, Suta Goswami later recited it to the sages of Naimisaranya, headed by Saunaka Rishi.

Previous Compilation of Bhagavatam Next The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Ripened fruit The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam In bygone ages, all Vedic knowledge was passed down orally. People would hear the knowledge, remember it, assimilate it, and perfectly communicate it to the next person without any adulteration. The power of comprehension was so great that no written books were required. Foreseeing the degradation of Kali-yuga, however, Vyasadeva was eager to have the knowledge documented for posterity. Technically speaking, each narration of Srimad-Bhagavatam is slightly different. For example, the Srimad-Bhagavatam spoken by Sukadeva Goswami to Maharaja Pariksit is obviously not identical to that which was spoken by Suta Goswami to Saunaka Rishi. That said, the substance, emphasis and conclusion remains eternally unchanged. What to speak of these slight variations, in the various planetary systems we find different versions of the Srimad-Bhagavatam for different gradations of living entity. The Srimad-Bhagavatam existing in heavenly planets, for example, is far more voluminous. For the earthly humans, Vyasadeva chose to record the recital between Suta Goswami and Saunaka Rishi as the written form of Srimad-Bhagavatam. At the time of writing, numerous narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam were being conducted amongst the sages. Once this dialogue was put into written form, however, it became the standard. Spontaneous recitals of Srimad-Bhagavatam gradually disappeared, and as people lost their recollective powers they took shelter of this documented form of the epic conversation.

Previous Ripened fruit Next L - Love (7-11) Last updated 1 year ago

The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Chapter 3 Srimad-Bhagavatam is the ripened fruit on the tree of all Vedic knowledge, and the twenty-eighth verse of Chapter Three is said to be the emperor of all its verses. After describing twenty-two of the Lord’s unlimited incarnations, Suta Goswami establishes, in no uncertain terms, that Krishna is the original source of them all: “All of the above-mentioned incarnations are either plenary portions or portions of the plenary portions of the Lord, but Lord Sri Krishna is the original Personality of Godhead. All of them appear on planets whenever there is a disturbance created by the atheists. The Lord incarnates to protect the theists.” ( SB 1.3.28 ) This verse, also known as the paribhasa-sutra (a verse which governs the entire book), reveals the purpose and essence of the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam – that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and the all-attractive goal of life.

Previous Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Next History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.1

↗
సూత ఉవాచ అథ తం సుఖమాసీన ఉపాసీనం బృహచ్ఛ్రవా: । దేవర్షి: ప్రాహ విప్రర్షిం వీణాపాణి: స్మయన్నివ ॥ ౧ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
atha taṁ sukham āsīna
[atha tam sukham aaseena]
upāsīnaṁ bṛhac-chravāḥ
[upaaseenam brihach-chravaah]
devarṣiḥ prāha viprarṣiṁ
[devarshih praaha viprarshim]
vīṇā-pāṇiḥ smayann iva
[veenaa-paanih smayann iva]
sūtaḥ — Sūta uvāca — said atha — therefore tam — him sukham āsīnaḥ — comfortably seated upāsīnam — unto one sitting nearby bṛhat-śravāḥ — greatly respected devarṣiḥ — the great ṛṣi among the gods prāha — said viprarṣim — unto the ṛṣi among the brāhmaṇas vīṇā-pāṇiḥ — one who carries a vīṇā in his hand smayan iva — apparently smiling.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ
Sūta
uvāca
said
atha taṁ sukham āsīna
atha
therefore
tam
him
sukham āsīnaḥ
comfortably seated
upāsīnaṁ bṛhac-chravāḥ
upāsīnam
unto one sitting nearby
bṛhat-śravāḥ
greatly respected
devarṣiḥ prāha viprarṣiṁ
devarṣiḥ
the great ṛṣi among the gods
prāha
said
viprarṣim
unto the ṛṣi among the brāhmaṇas
vīṇā-pāṇiḥ smayann iva
vīṇā-pāṇiḥ
one who carries a vīṇā in his hand
smayan iva
apparently smiling.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus the sage amongst the gods [Nārada], comfortably seated and apparently smiling, addressed the ṛṣi amongst the brāhmaṇas [Vedavyāsa].

Nārada was smiling because he well knew the great sage Vedavyāsa and the cause of his disappointment. As he will explain gradually, Vyāsadeva’s disappointment was due to insufficiency in presenting the science of devotional service. Nārada knew the defect, and it was confirmed by the position of Vyāsa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: The famous Nārada, with vīṇā in his hand, being seated comfortably, while slightly smiling, then spoke to Vyāsa, who was worshipping him.
Commentary

In the Fifth chapter, showing the uselessness of jṣāna and karma, Nārada teaches Vyāsa about bhakti with its chief component kīrtana.

Welcoming his guest, Vyāsa was worshipping (upāsīnam) him by offering āsana, arghya, pādya and other items. A slight smile appeared on Nārada’s lips, which shows that he, knowing everything, was internally pleased with Vyāsa. It was not possible for him to hide his smile by pretending something else, because of the interesting questions he would pose.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.2

↗
నారద ఉవాచ పారాశర్య మహాభాగ భవత: కచ్చిదాత్మనా । పరితుష్యతి శారీర ఆత్మా మానస ఏవ వా ॥ ౨ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
pārāśarya mahā-bhāga
[paaraasharya mahaa-bhaaga]
bhavataḥ kaccid ātmanā
[bhavatah kachchid aatmanaa]
parituṣyati śārīra
[paritushyati shaareera]
ātmā mānasa eva vā
[aatmaa maanasa eva vaa]
nāradaḥ — Nārada uvāca — said pārāśarya — O son of Parāśara mahā-bhāga — the greatly fortunate bhavataḥ — your kaccit — if it is ātmanā — by the self-realization of parituṣyati — does it satisfy śārīraḥ — identifying the body ātmā — self mānasaḥ — identifying the mind eva — certainly vā — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ
Nārada
uvāca
said
pārāśarya mahā-bhāga
pārāśarya
O son of Parāśara
mahā-bhāga
the greatly fortunate
bhavataḥ
your
bhavataḥ kaccid ātmanā
kaccit
if it is
ātmanā
by the self-realization of
parituṣyati śārīra
parituṣyati
does it satisfy
śārīraḥ
identifying the body
ātmā mānasa eva vā
ātmā
self
mānasaḥ
identifying the mind
eva
certainly
vā
and.
Addressing Vyāsadeva, the son of Parāśara, Nārada inquired: Are you satisfied by identifying with the body or the mind as objects of self-realization?

This was a hint by Nārada to Vyāsadeva regarding the cause of his despondency. Vyāsadeva, as the descendant of Parāśara, a greatly powerful sage, had the privilege of having a great parentage which should not have given Vyāsadeva cause for despondency. Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyāsadeva should not have done so. One cannot be cheerful by nature unless one is factually seated in self-realization, which is transcendental to the material body and mind.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Great soul, son of Parāśara! If you think you are your body, is your body pleased with your body or not? Or if you think you are your mind, is your mind pleased with your mind or not?
Commentary

Śārīraḥ ātmā here means “identifying oneself with the body.” Is this self satisfied with the body (ātmanā)? Is your self identifying with the mind (mānasa ātmā) satisfied with the mind (ātmanā)? Kaccid means “or not.” Addressing Vyāsa as the most fortunate son of Parāśara, Nārada suggests that if Vyāsa possesses such powerful ancestry, how could he lament? Thus he implies disappointment in Vyāsa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.3

↗
జిజ్ఞాసితం సుసమ్పన్నమపి తే మహదద్భ‍ుతమ్ । కృతవాన్ భారతం యస్త్వం సర్వార్థపరిబృంహితమ్ ॥ ౩ ॥
jijṣāsitaṁ susampannam
[jijshaasitam susampannam]
api te mahad-adbhutam
[api te mahad-adbhutam]
kṛtavān bhārataṁ yas tvaṁ
[kritavaan bhaaratam yas tvam]
sarvārtha-paribṛṁhitam
[sarvaartha-paribrimhitam]
jijṣāsitam — fully inquired susampannam — well versed api — in spite of te — your mahat-adbhutam — great and wonderful kṛtavān — prepared bhāratam — the Mahābhārata yaḥ tvam — what you have done sarva-artha — including all sequences paribṛṁhitam — elaborately explained.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jijṣāsitaṁ susampannam
jijṣāsitam
fully inquired
susampannam
well versed
api te mahad-adbhutam
api
in spite of
te
your
mahat-adbhutam
great and wonderful
kṛtavān bhārataṁ yas tvaṁ
kṛtavān
prepared
bhāratam
the Mahābhārata
yaḥ tvam
what you have done
sarvārtha-paribṛṁhitam
sarva-artha
including all sequences
paribṛṁhitam
elaborately explained.
Your inquiries were full and your studies were also well fulfilled, and there is no doubt that you have prepared a great and wonderful work, the Mahābhārata, which is full of all kinds of Vedic sequences elaborately explained.

The despondency of Vyāsadeva was certainly not due to his lack of sufficient knowledge because as a student he had fully inquired about the Vedic literatures, as a result of which the Mahābhārata is compiled with full explanation of the Vedas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You wrote the most astonishing Mahābhārata, complete with all instructions on artha, dharma, kāma and mokṣa. All that one desires to know is presented perfectly in this work.
Commentary

You cannot say that the source of your dissatisfaction is lack of scriptural knowledge, because you wrote the Mahābhārata.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.4

↗
జిజ్ఞాసితమధీతం చ బ్రహ్మ యత్తత్సనాతనమ్ । తథాపి శోచస్యాత్మానమకృతార్థ ఇవ ప్రభో ॥ ౪ ॥
jijṣāsitam adhītaṁ ca
[jijshaasitam adheetam cha]
brahma yat tat sanātanam
[brahma yat tat sanaatanam]
tathāpi śocasy ātmānam
[tathaapi shochasy aatmaanam]
akṛtārtha iva prabho
[akritaartha iva prabho]
jijṣāsitam — deliberated fully well adhītam — the knowledge obtained ca — and brahma — the Absolute yat — what tat — that sanātanam — eternal tathāpi — in spite of that śocasi — lamenting ātmānam — unto the self akṛta-arthaḥ — undone iva — like prabho — my dear sir.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jijṣāsitam adhītaṁ ca
jijṣāsitam
deliberated fully well
adhītam
the knowledge obtained
ca
and
brahma yat tat sanātanam
brahma
the Absolute
yat
what
tat
that
sanātanam
eternal
tathāpi śocasy ātmānam
tathāpi
in spite of that
śocasi
lamenting
ātmānam
unto the self
akṛtārtha iva prabho
akṛta-arthaḥ
undone
iva
like
prabho
my dear sir.
You have fully delineated the subject of impersonal Brahman as well as the knowledge derived therefrom. Why should you be despondent in spite of all this, thinking that you are undone, my dear prabhu?

The Vedānta-sūtra, or Brahma-sūtra, compiled by Śrī Vyāsadeva is the full deliberation of the impersonal absolute feature, and it is accepted as the most exalted philosophical exposition in the world. It covers the subject of eternity, and the methods are scholarly. So there cannot be any doubt about the transcendental scholarship of Vyāsadeva. So why should he lament?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You have also investigated and realized the brahman which is eternal. Then why should you lament that you have been unsuccessful?
Commentary

Nor can you say that the reason for lamentation is lack of realized knowledge, because you have investigated and made conclusions in the Vedānta-sūtras about the eternal brahman that spreads everywhere in impersonal form. Not only did you inquire about brahman (jijṣāsitam), but you have understood and realized (adhītam) that brahman. Śrīdhara Svāmī says adhītam means understood or attained.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.5

↗
వ్యాస ఉవాచ అస్త్యేవ మే సర్వమిదం త్వయోక్తం తథాపి నాత్మా పరితుష్యతే మే । తన్మూలమవ్యక్తమగాధబోధం పృచ్ఛామహే త్వాత్మభవాత్మభూతమ్ ॥ ౫ ॥
vyāsa uvāca
[vyaasa uvaacha]
asty eva me sarvam idaṁ tvayoktaṁ
[asty eva me sarvam idam tvayoktam]
tathāpi nātmā parituṣyate me
[tathaapi naatmaa paritushyate me]
tan-mūlam avyaktam agādha-bodhaṁ
[tan-moolam avyaktam agaadha-bodham]
pṛcchāmahe tvātma-bhavātma-bhūtam
[prichchaamahe tvaatma-bhavaatma-bhootam]
vyāsaḥ — Vyāsa uvāca — said asti — there is eva — certainly me — mine sarvam — all idam — this tvayā — by you uktam — uttered tathāpi — and yet na — not ātmā — self parituṣyate — does pacify me — unto me tat — of which mūlam — root avyaktam — undetected agādha-bodham — the man of unlimited knowledge pṛcchāmahe — do inquire tvā — unto you ātma-bhava — self-born ātma-bhūtam — offspring.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyāsa uvāca
vyāsaḥ
Vyāsa
uvāca
said
asty eva me sarvam idaṁ tvayoktaṁ
asti
there is
eva
certainly
me
mine
sarvam
all
idam
this
tvayā
by you
uktam
uttered
tathāpi
and yet
tathāpi nātmā parituṣyate me
na
not
ātmā
self
parituṣyate
does pacify
me
unto me
tan-mūlam avyaktam agādha-bodhaṁ
tat
of which
mūlam
root
avyaktam
undetected
agādha-bodham
the man of unlimited knowledge
pṛcchāmahe tvātma-bhavātma-bhūtam
pṛcchāmahe
do inquire
tvā
unto you
ātma-bhava
self-born
ātma-bhūtam
offspring.
Śrī Vyāsadeva said: All you have said about me is perfectly correct. Despite all this, I am not pacified. I therefore question you about the root cause of my dissatisfaction, for you are a man of unlimited knowledge due to your being the offspring of one [Brahmā] who is self-born [without mundane father and mother].

In the material world everyone is engrossed with the idea of identifying the body or the mind with the self. As such, all knowledge disseminated in the material world is related either with the body or with the mind, and that is the root cause of all despondencies. This is not always detected, even though one may be the greatest erudite scholar in materialistic knowledge. It is good, therefore, to approach a personality like Nārada to solve the root cause of all despondencies. Why Nārada should be approached is explained below.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vyāsa said: What you said about me is true. Yet my mind and body are not satisfied. I am asking the imperceptible reason for this from you because you were born from the body of self-born Brahmā and hence you possess great knowledge.
Commentary

I ask you the cause (tan-mūlam) which is hard to understand (me avyaktam). The particle he indicates that he does not know. I ask you because you were born (bhūtam) from the body (ātma) of Brahmā (ātma-bhava). The power derived from the lineage of your father is the cause of your having great unfathomable knowledge (agādha-bodham).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.6

↗
స వై భవాన్ వేద సమస్తగుహ్య- ముపాసితో యత్పురుష: పురాణ: । పరావరేశో మనసైవ విశ్వం సృజత్యవత్యత్తి గుణైరసఙ్గ: ॥ ౬ ॥
sa vai bhavān veda samasta-guhyam
[sa vai bhavaan veda samasta-guhyam]
upāsito yat puruṣaḥ purāṇaḥ
[upaasito yat purushah puraanah]
parāvareśo manasaiva viśvaṁ
[paraavaresho manasaiva vishvam]
sṛjaty avaty atti guṇair asaṅgaḥ
[srijaty avaty atti gunair asangah]
saḥ — thus vai — certainly bhavān — yourself veda — know samasta — all-inclusive guhyam — confidential upāsitaḥ — devotee of yat — because puruṣaḥ — the Personality of Godhead purāṇaḥ — the oldest para-avara-īśaḥ — the controller of the material and spiritual worlds manasā — mind eva — only viśvam — the universe sṛjati — creates avati atti — annihilates guṇaiḥ — by the qualitative matter asaṅgaḥ — unattached.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vai bhavān veda samasta-guhyam
saḥ
thus
vai
certainly
bhavān
yourself
veda
know
samasta
all-inclusive
guhyam
confidential
upāsito yat puruṣaḥ purāṇaḥ
upāsitaḥ
devotee of
yat
because
puruṣaḥ
the Personality of Godhead
purāṇaḥ
the oldest
parāvareśo manasaiva viśvaṁ
para-avara-īśaḥ
the controller of the material and spiritual worlds
manasā
mind
eva
only
viśvam
the universe
sṛjaty avaty atti guṇair asaṅgaḥ
sṛjati
creates
avati atti
annihilates
guṇaiḥ
by the qualitative matter
asaṅgaḥ
unattached.
My lord! Everything that is mysterious is known to you because you worship the creator and destroyer of the material world and the maintainer of the spiritual world, the original Personality of Godhead, who is transcendental to the three modes of material nature.

A person who is cent-percent engaged in the service of the Lord is the emblem of all knowledge. Such a devotee of the Lord in full perfection of devotional service is also perfect by the qualification of the Personality of Godhead. As such, the eightfold perfections of mystic power ( aṣṭa-siddhi ) constitute very little of his godly opulence. A devotee like Nārada can act wonderfully by his spiritual perfection, which every individual is trying to attain. Śrīla Nārada is a cent-percent perfect living being, although not equal to the Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord is also you since you are an avatāra of the Lord. Certainly you know all secrets, because you worship the original person, the lord of cause and effect, who, remaining unaffected, creates, maintains and destroys the universe along with the guṇas by his will alone.
Commentary

You have described me as the son of Parāśara, with a great lineage, with knowledge of the four Vedas and realization of brahman. But you are the son of Brahmā, omniscient (agādha-bodham), and worshipper of the Supreme Lord. In all ways you thus surpass me! That is understood when Vyāsa says “You worship the Supreme Lord (purāṇaḥ puruṣaḥ upāsitaḥ).” The words starting with parāvareśaḥ (lord of cause and effect) further describe that Supreme Lord. That Lord (saḥ) is certainly (vai) you (bhavān), since you, Nārada, are an avatāra of the Lord. Therefore you know the whole secret and the secret behind all things (samasta-guhyam).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.7

↗
త్వం పర్యటన్నర్క ఇవ త్రిలోకీ- మన్తశ్చరో వాయురివాత్మసాక్షీ । పరావరే బ్రహ్మణి ధర్మతో వ్రతై: స్‍నాతస్య మే న్యూనమలం విచక్ష్వ ॥ ౭ ॥
tvaṁ paryaṭann arka iva tri-lokīm
[tvam paryatann arka iva tri-lokeem]
antaś-caro vāyur ivātma-sākṣī
[antash-charo vaayur ivaatma-saakshee]
parāvare brahmaṇi dharmato vrataiḥ
[paraavare brahmani dharmato vrataih]
snātasya me nyūnam alaṁ vicakṣva
[snaatasya me nyoonam alam vichakshva]
tvam — Your Goodness paryaṭan — traveling arkaḥ — the sun iva — like tri-lokīm — the three worlds antaḥ-caraḥ — can penetrate into everyone’s heart vāyuḥ iva — as good as the all-pervading air ātma — self-realized sākṣī — witness para-avare — in the matter of cause and effect brahmaṇi — in the Absolute dharmataḥ — under disciplinary regulations vrataiḥ — in vow snātasya — having been absorbed in me — mine nyūnam — deficiency alam — clearly vicakṣva — search out.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvaṁ paryaṭann arka iva tri-lokīm
tvam
Your Goodness
paryaṭan
traveling
arkaḥ
the sun
iva
like
tri-lokīm
the three worlds
antaś-caro vāyur ivātma-sākṣī
antaḥ-caraḥ
can penetrate into everyone’s heart
vāyuḥ iva
as good as the all-pervading air
ātma
self-realized
sākṣī
witness
parāvare brahmaṇi dharmato vrataiḥ
para-avare
in the matter of cause and effect
brahmaṇi
in the Absolute
dharmataḥ
under disciplinary regulations
vrataiḥ
in vow
snātasya me nyūnam alaṁ vicakṣva
snātasya
having been absorbed in
me
mine
nyūnam
deficiency
alam
clearly
vicakṣva
search out.
Like the sun, Your Goodness can travel everywhere in the three worlds, and like the air you can penetrate the internal region of everyone. As such, you are as good as the all-pervasive Supersoul. Please, therefore, find out the deficiency in me, despite my being absorbed in transcendence under disciplinary regulations and vows.

Transcendental realization, pious activities, worshiping the Deities, charity, mercifulness, nonviolence and studying the scriptures under strict disciplinary regulations are always helpful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You wander like the sun throughout the three worlds seeing everything and wander like the life air throughout the body as the witness of everyone’s intelligence. Though I have become very proficient in the Vedas and have realized the brahman by proper methods, it is not enough. Please consider this.
Commentary

The original person, the supreme lord, has descended as you to give benefit to the world. Today, please help me. You wander throughout the three worlds like the sun, which sees everything and like the life air which moves within, knowing the actions of the intellect (ātma-sākṣī). I am well versed by proper method (dharmataḥ) in the supreme brahman (para brahmaṇi), and in the statements of the Veda (avare brahmaṇi) by rules of study (vrataiḥ). Dharma refers to “method” in this verse because Yājṣavalkya says:

ijyācāra-damāhiṁsā-dāna-svādhyāya-karmaṇām | ayaṁ tu paramo dharmo yad-yogenātma-darśanam ||

The supreme dharma by which method one can realize ātma consists of worship, proper conduct, control of the senses, non-violence, charity, and study. Yājṣavalkya-smṛti 1.8

This is sufficient (alam), but it is still insufficient (nyūnam)! Please consider all this.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.8

↗
శ్రీనారద ఉవాచ భవతానుదితప్రాయం యశో భగవతోఽమలమ్ । యేనైవాసౌ న తుష్యేత మన్యే తద్దర్శనం ఖిలమ్ ॥ ౮ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
bhavatānudita-prāyaṁ
[bhavataanudita-praayam]
yaśo bhagavato ’malam
[yasho bhagavato ’malam]
yenaivāsau na tuṣyeta
[yenaivaasau na tushyeta]
manye tad darśanaṁ khilam
[manye tad darshanam khilam]
śrī-nāradaḥ — Śrī Nārada uvāca — said bhavatā — by you anudita-prāyam — almost not praised yaśaḥ — glories bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead amalam — spotless yena — by which eva — certainly asau — He (the Personality of Godhead) na — does not tuṣyeta — be pleased manye — I think tat — that darśanam — philosophy khilam — inferior.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ
Śrī Nārada
uvāca
said
bhavatānudita-prāyaṁ
bhavatā
by you
anudita-prāyam
almost not praised
yaśaḥ
glories
yaśo bhagavato ’malam
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
amalam
spotless
yenaivāsau na tuṣyeta
yena
by which
eva
certainly
asau
He (the Personality of Godhead)
na
does not
tuṣyeta
be pleased
manye tad darśanaṁ khilam
manye
I think
tat
that
darśanam
philosophy
khilam
inferior.
Śrī Nārada said: You have not actually broadcast the sublime and spotless glories of the Personality of Godhead. That philosophy which does not satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord is considered worthless.

The eternal relation of an individual soul with the Supreme Soul Personality of Godhead is constitutionally one of being the eternal servitor of the eternal master. The Lord has expanded Himself as living beings in order to accept loving service from them, and this alone can satisfy both the Lord and the living beings. Such a scholar as Vyāsadeva has completed many expansions of the Vedic literatures, ending with the Vedānta philosophy, but none of them have been written directly glorifying the Personality of Godhead. Dry philosophical speculations even on the transcendental subject of the Absolute have very little attraction without directly dealing with the glorification of the Lord. The Personality of Godhead is the last word in transcendental realization. The Absolute realized as impersonal Brahman or localized Supersoul, Paramātmā, is less productive of transcendental bliss than the supreme personal realization of His glories.

The compiler of the Vedānta-darśana is Vyāsadeva himself. Yet he is troubled, although he is the author. So what sort of transcendental bliss can be derived by the readers and listeners of Vedānta which is not explained directly by Vyāsadeva, the author? Herein arises the necessity of explaining Vedānta-sūtra in the form of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam by the self-same author.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: You have not sufficiently described the glories of the spotless Lord Kṛṣṇa. Because your mind could never be satisfied with Vedānta, I think that writing the Vedānta-sūtras is insufficient.
Commentary

You have not described much at all (anudita-prāyam) about the spotless glories of the Lord—the superior position of bhagavān’s forms above all other forms, and the supreme attractiveness of his pastimes and bhakti.

“But I have produced the brahma-mīmāṁsa scripture, the vedānta-darṣana.”

“I consider that darśana scripture to be deficient (khilam). You are the writer of Vedānta and if your mind is dissatisfied with this, then how will those who continually study this darśana be satisfied? You are the proof that this darśana is insufficient.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.9

↗
యథా ధర్మాదయశ్చార్థా మునివర్యానుకీర్తితా: । న తథా వాసుదేవస్య మహిమా హ్యనువర్ణిత: ॥ ౯ ॥
yathā dharmādayaś cārthā
[yathaa dharmaadayash chaarthaa]
muni-varyānukīrtitāḥ
[muni-varyaanukeertitaah]
na tathā vāsudevasya
[na tathaa vaasudevasya]
mahimā hy anuvarṇitaḥ
[mahimaa hy anuvarnitah]
yathā — as much as dharma-ādayaḥ — all four principles of religious behavior ca — and arthāḥ — purposes muni-varya — by yourself, the great sage anukīrtitāḥ — repeatedly described na — not tathā — in that way vāsudevasya — of the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa mahimā — glories hi — certainly anuvarṇitaḥ — so constantly described.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā dharmādayaś cārthā
yathā
as much as
dharma-ādayaḥ
all four principles of religious behavior
ca
and
arthāḥ
purposes
muni-varyānukīrtitāḥ
muni-varya
by yourself, the great sage
anukīrtitāḥ
repeatedly described
na tathā vāsudevasya
na
not
tathā
in that way
vāsudevasya
of the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
mahimā hy anuvarṇitaḥ
mahimā
glories
hi
certainly
anuvarṇitaḥ
so constantly described.
Although, great sage, you have very broadly described the four principles beginning with religious performances, you have not described the glories of the Supreme Personality, Vāsudeva.

The prompt diagnosis of Śrī Nārada is at once declared. The root cause of the despondency of Vyāsadeva was his deliberate avoidance of glorifying the Lord in his various editions of the Purāṇas. He has certainly, as a matter of course, given descriptions of the glories of the Lord (Śrī Kṛṣṇa), but not as many as given to religiosity, economic development, sense gratification and salvation. These four items are by far inferior to engagement in the devotional service of the Lord. Śrī Vyāsadeva, as the authorized scholar, knew very well this difference. And still, instead of giving more importance to the better type of engagement, namely devotional service to the Lord, he had more or less improperly used his valuable time, and thus he was despondent. From this it is clearly indicated that no one can be pleased substantially without being engaged in the devotional service of the Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā this fact is clearly mentioned.

After liberation, which is the last item in the line of performing religiosity, etc., one is engaged in pure devotional service. This is called the stage of self-realization, or the brahma-bhūta stage. After attainment of this brahma-bhūta stage, one is satisfied. But satisfaction is the beginning of transcendental bliss. One should progress by attaining neutrality and equality in the relative world. And passing this stage of equanimity, one is fixed in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. This is the instruction of the Personality of Godhead in the Bhagavad-gītā. The conclusion is that in order to maintain the status quo of the brahma-bhūta stage, as also to increase the degree of transcendental realization, Nārada recommended to Vyāsadeva that he (Vyāsadeva) should now eagerly and repeatedly describe the path of devotional service. This would cure him from gross despondency.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O venerable sage! You have not repeatedly described the glories of Vāsudeva Kṛṣṇa to the extent that you have glorified dharma, artha, kāma and mokṣa.
Commentary

“But I have described the wonderful qualities and pastimes of Kṛṣṇa in the Padma Purāṇa and others as well.”

The word ca here means “though.” You have not described the glories of Vāsudeva as much as you have described artha, dharma, kāma and mokṣa as the goals of human life (arthā) even though they are much inferior to the glories of Vāsudeva. Though Vāsudeva is the crest jewel of human goals, you have not described him as the goal of human endeavor. Though you have described the glories of Kṛṣṇa abundantly in many places, they have been described only as a means of getting mokṣa. How can you mind be satisfied when there is a lack of regard for that which should have been given the most regard?

“But I have described bhakti to be higher than liberation in many places in other scriptures.

anyatra puṇya-tīrtheṣu muktir eva mahā-phalam | muktaiḥ prārthyā harer bhaktir mathurāyāṁ ca labhyata

Liberation is the highest goal in visiting other holy places, but devotion to the Lord, prayed for by the liberated souls, can be obtained at Mathurā. Padma Purāṇa

brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā na śocati na kāṅkṣati | samaḥ sarveṣu bhūteṣu mad-bhaktiṁ labhate parām ||

One who attains brahman, equal to all living entities, does not lament or desire. He then attains pure devotion to me. BG 18.54”

“But you have not done so repeatedly (na anuvarṇitaḥ). You must do so, because it is said that the meaning of scriptures is revealed by repetition as in ānandamayo ’bhyāsāt: the ānandamaya-puruṣa is the supreme lord because of repetition of words to indicate this (Vedānta-sūtra 1.1.13). Your mind will be satisfied only when you describe very clearly with repetition the glories of the Lord, since those glories alone are finally the most excellent.”

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.10

↗
న యద్వచశ్చిత్రపదం హరేర్యశో జగత్పవిత్రం ప్రగృణీత కర్హిచిత్ । తద్వాయసం తీర్థముశన్తి మానసా న యత్ర హంసా నిరమన్త్యుశిక్క్షయా: ॥ ౧౦ ॥
na yad vacaś citra-padaṁ harer yaśo
[na yad vachash chitra-padam harer yasho]
jagat-pavitraṁ pragṛṇīta karhicit
[jagat-pavitram pragrineeta karhichit]
tad vāyasaṁ tīrtham uśanti mānasā
[tad vaayasam teertham ushanti maanasaa]
na yatra haṁsā niramanty uśik-kṣayāḥ
[na yatra hamsaa niramanty ushik-kshayaah]
na — not yat — that vacaḥ — vocabulary citra-padam — decorative hareḥ — of the Lord yaśaḥ — glories jagat — universe pavitram — sanctified pragṛṇīta — described karhicit — hardly tat — that vāyasam — crows tīrtham — place of pilgrimage uśanti — think mānasāḥ — saintly persons na — not yatra — where haṁsāḥ — all-perfect beings niramanti — take pleasure uśik-kṣayāḥ — those who reside in the transcendental abode.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na yad vacaś citra-padaṁ harer yaśo
na
not
yat
that
vacaḥ
vocabulary
citra-padam
decorative
hareḥ
of the Lord
yaśaḥ
glories
jagat-pavitraṁ pragṛṇīta karhicit
jagat
universe
pavitram
sanctified
pragṛṇīta
described
karhicit
hardly
tad vāyasaṁ tīrtham uśanti mānasā
tat
that
vāyasam
crows
tīrtham
place of pilgrimage
uśanti
think
mānasāḥ
saintly persons
na yatra haṁsā niramanty uśik-kṣayāḥ
na
not
yatra
where
haṁsāḥ
all-perfect beings
niramanti
take pleasure
uśik-kṣayāḥ
those who reside in the transcendental abode.
Those words which do not describe the glories of the Lord, who alone can sanctify the atmosphere of the whole universe, are considered by saintly persons to be like unto a place of pilgrimage for crows. Since the all-perfect persons are inhabitants of the transcendental abode, they do not derive any pleasure there.

Crows and swans are not birds of the same feather, because of their different mental attitudes. The fruitive workers or passionate men are compared to the crows, whereas the all-perfect saintly persons are compared to the swans. The crows take pleasure in a place where garbage is thrown out, just as the passionate fruitive workers take pleasure in wine and woman and places for gross sense pleasure. The swans do not take pleasure in the places where crows are assembled for conferences and meetings. They are instead seen in the atmosphere of natural scenic beauty where there are transparent reservoirs of water nicely decorated with stems of lotus flowers in variegated colors of natural beauty. That is the difference between the two classes of birds.

Nature has influenced different species of life with different mentalities, and it is not possible to bring them up into the same rank and file.

Similarly, there are different kinds of literature for different types of men of different mentality. Mostly the market literatures which attract men of the crow’s categories are literatures containing refused remnants of sensuous topics. They are generally known as mundane talks in relation with the gross body and subtle mind. They are full of subject matter described in decorative language full of mundane similes and metaphorical arrangements. Yet with all that, they do not glorify the Lord. Such poetry and prose, on any subject matter, is considered decoration of a dead body. Spiritually advanced men who are compared to the swans do not take pleasure in such dead literatures, which are sources of pleasure for men who are spiritually dead. These literatures in the modes of passion and ignorance are distributed under different labels, but they can hardly help the spiritual urge of the human being, and thus the swanlike spiritually advanced men have nothing to do with them. Such spiritually advanced men are called mānasa also because they always keep up the standard of transcendental voluntary service to the Lord on the spiritual plane. This completely forbids fruitive activities for gross bodily sense satisfaction or subtle speculation of the material egoistic mind.

Social literary men, scientists, mundane poets, theoretical philosophers and politicians who are completely absorbed in the material advancement of sense pleasure are all dolls of the material energy. They take pleasure in a place where rejected subject matters are thrown. According to Svāmī Śrīdhara, this is the pleasure of the prostitute-hunters.

But literatures which describe the glories of the Lord are enjoyed by the paramahaṁsas who have grasped the essence of human activities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Works whose attractive verses do not sing at all the glories of the Lord, which purify not only the author but the whole world, are considered by the devotees who have captured the mind of the Lord to be the place for crows, in whiche swans, living in pleasant lakes, take no enjoyment at all.
Commentary

Even poetic works should be condemned if they are devoid of glorification of the Vāsudeva.

A work whose verses do not proclaim the glories of the Lord — which purify even the whole world composed of speakers and listeners, what to speak of the author — is actually like a dead body. It is very impure without describing the glories of the Lord which are like life itself, even though it may be endowed with qualities and poetic ornaments ((citra-padam) and is also a cause for surprise or dismay (another meaning of citra).

It is considered to be (uśanti) a place for crows, a hole filled with various left-over foods, which is desired by persons filled with lust, who are like crows. It is a place where the swans of Mānasa-sarovara (mānasā haṁsā) or the devotees situated in the mind of the Lord absolutely (ni for nitarām) never enjoy (ramanti).

sādhavo hṛdayaṁ mahyaṁ sādhūnāṁ hṛdayaṁ tv aham mad-anyat te na jānanti nāhaṁ tebhyo manāg api

Saints are my heart, and only I am their hearts. They do not know anyone but me, and therefore I do not recognize anyone besides them as mine. SB 9.4.68

Or mānasāḥ can mean “those who destroy (sā) respect (māna) for those words since they find no pleasure in them. Or mānasāḥ can mean the mental sons of Brahmā such as the Kumāras. The Kumāras proclaim (mānasāḥ uśanti) this. Uśik means pleasant and kśaya means lake in the case of reference to the swans, or it can mean abode. Thus uśik-kṣayāḥ means those possessing the abode of the Lord. This would refer to the Kumāras who were free to enter the Lord’s abode.

The word vacaḥ means statements, what is spoken. Therefore statements like the following would appear to make Bhāgavatam a place for the crows.

nābhāgo nabhagāpatyaṁ yaṁ tataṁ bhrātaraḥ kavim yaviṣṭhaṁ vyabhajan dāyaṁ brahmacāriṇam āgatam

The brothers gave to their youngest learned brother Nābhāga their father Nabhaga as his share of the property when he returned from brahmacārī life. SB 9.4.1

And it may be argued that none of the Purāṇas written by Vyāsa should be considered as a place of crows, since nothing there is completely devoid of the glories of the Lord. To this however it can be said:

kali-mala-saṁhati-kālano ’khileśo harir itaratra na gīyate hy abhīkṣṇam iha tu punar bhagavān aśeṣa-mūrtiḥ paripaṭhito ’nu-padaṁ kathā-prasaṅgaiḥ

Nārāyaṇa, the soul of the universal form, who annihilates the accumulated sins of the Kali age, is not glorified much in other works. But Bhagavān, with unlimited forms, is abundantly and constantly described throughout the various narrations of this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. SB 12.12.66

Taking this verse and the next verse in the Bhāgavatam into consideration, the word vacaḥ should mean the general import of the discussion, rather than each sentence. That being the case, the chapters and stories of Bhāgavatam are all ornaments to the glories of the Lord. In other Purāṇas, however many of the stories are devoid of the glories of the lord and are therefore the place of the crows. Thus there is no contradiction.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.11

↗
తద్వాగ్విసర్గో జనతాఘవిప్లవో యస్మిన్ ప్రతిశ్లోకమబద్ధవత్యపి । నామాన్యనన్తస్య యశోఽఙ్కితాని యత్ శ‍ృణ్వన్తి గాయన్తి గృణన్తి సాధవ: ॥ ౧౧ ॥
tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo
[tad-vaag-visargo janataagha-viplavo]
yasmin prati-ślokam abaddhavaty api
[yasmin prati-shlokam abaddhavaty api]
nāmāny anantasya yaśo ’ṅkitāni yat
[naamaany anantasya yasho ’nkitaani yat]
śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanti sādhavaḥ
[shrinvanti gaayanti grinanti saadhavah]
tat — that vāk — vocabulary visargaḥ — creation janatā — the people in general agha — sins viplavaḥ — revolutionary yasmin — in which prati-ślokam — each and every stanza abaddhavati — irregularly composed api — in spite of nāmāni — transcendental names, etc. anantasya — of the unlimited Lord yaśaḥ — glories aṅkitāni — depicted yat — what śṛṇvanti — do hear gāyanti — do sing gṛṇanti — do accept sādhavaḥ — the purified men who are honest.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo
tat
that
vāk
vocabulary
visargaḥ
creation
janatā
the people in general
agha
sins
viplavaḥ
revolutionary
yasmin prati-ślokam abaddhavaty api
yasmin
in which
prati-ślokam
each and every stanza
abaddhavati
irregularly composed
api
in spite of
nāmāny anantasya yaśo ’ṅkitāni yat
nāmāni
transcendental names, etc.
anantasya
of the unlimited Lord
yaśaḥ
glories
aṅkitāni
depicted
yat
what
śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanti sādhavaḥ
śṛṇvanti
do hear
gāyanti
do sing
gṛṇanti
do accept
sādhavaḥ
the purified men who are honest.
On the other hand, that literature which is full of descriptions of the transcendental glories of the name, fame, forms, pastimes, etc., of the unlimited Supreme Lord is a different creation, full of transcendental words directed toward bringing about a revolution in the impious lives of this world’s misdirected civilization. Such transcendental literatures, even though imperfectly composed, are heard, sung and accepted by purified men who are thoroughly honest.

It is a qualification of the great thinkers to pick up the best even from the worst. It is said that the intelligent man should pick up nectar from a stock of poison, should accept gold even from a filthy place, should accept a good and qualified wife even from an obscure family and should accept a good lesson even from a man or from a teacher who comes from the untouchables. These are some of the ethical instructions for everyone in every place without exception. But a saint is far above the level of an ordinary man. He is always absorbed in glorifying the Supreme Lord because by broadcasting the holy name and fame of the Supreme Lord, the polluted atmosphere of the world will change, and as a result of propagating the transcendental literatures like Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, people will become sane in their transactions. While preparing this commentation on this particular stanza of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam we have a crisis before us. Our neighboring friend China has attacked the border of India with a militaristic spirit. We have practically no business in the political field, yet we see that previously there were both China and India, and they both lived peacefully for centuries without ill feeling. The reason is that they lived those days in an atmosphere of God consciousness, and every country, over the surface of the world, was God-fearing, purehearted and simple, and there was no question of political diplomacy. There is no cause of quarrel between the two countries China and India over land which is not very suitable for habitation, and certainly there is no cause for fighting on this issue. But due to the age of quarrel, Kali, which we have discussed, there is always a chance of quarrel on slight provocation. This is due not to the issue in question, but to the polluted atmosphere of this age: systematically there is propaganda by a section of people to stop glorification of the name and fame of the Supreme Lord. Therefore, there is a great need for disseminating the message of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam all over the world. It is the duty of every responsible Indian to broadcast the transcendental message of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam throughout the world to do all the supermost good as well as to bring about the desired peace in the world. Because India has failed in her duty by neglecting this responsible work, there is so much quarrel and trouble all over the world. We are confident that if the transcendental message of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is received only by the leading men of the world, certainly there will be a change of heart, and naturally the people in general will follow them. The mass of people in general are tools in the hands of the modern politicians and leaders of the people. If there is a change of heart of the leaders only, certainly there will be a radical change in the atmosphere of the world. We know that our honest attempt to present this great literature conveying transcendental messages for reviving the God consciousness of the people in general and respiritualizing the world atmosphere is fraught with many difficulties. Our presenting this matter in adequate language, especially a foreign language, will certainly fail, and there will be so many literary discrepancies despite our honest attempt to present it in the proper way. But we are sure that with all our faults in this connection the seriousness of the subject matter will be taken into consideration, and the leaders of society will still accept this due to its being an honest attempt to glorify the almighty God. When there is fire in a house, the inmates of the house go out to get help from the neighbors who may be foreigners, and yet without knowing the language the victims of the fire express themselves, and the neighbors understand the need, even though not expressed in the same language. The same spirit of cooperation is needed to broadcast this transcendental message of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam throughout the polluted atmosphere of the world. After all, it is a technical science of spiritual values, and thus we are concerned with the techniques and not with the language. If the techniques of this great literature are understood by the people of the world, there will be success.

When there are too many materialistic activities by the people in general all over the world, there is no wonder that a person or a nation attacks another person or nation on slight provocation. That is the rule of this Age of Kali or quarrel. The atmosphere is already polluted with corruption of all description, and everyone knows it well. There are so many unwanted literatures full of materialistic ideas of sense gratification. In many countries there are bodies appointed by the state to detect and censor obscene literature. This means that neither the government nor the responsible leaders of the public want such literature, yet it is in the marketplace because the people want it for sense gratification. The people in general want to read (that is a natural instinct), but because their minds are polluted they want such literatures. Under the circumstances, transcendental literature like Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam will not only diminish the activities of the corrupt mind of the people in general, but also it will supply food for their hankering after reading some interesting literature. In the beginning they may not like it because one suffering from jaundice is reluctant to take sugar candy, but we should know that sugar candy is the only remedy for jaundice. Similarly, let there be systematic propaganda for popularizing reading of the Bhagavad-gītā and the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which will act like sugar candy for the jaundicelike condition of sense gratification. When men have a taste for this literature, the other literatures, which are catering poison to society, will then automatically cease.

We are sure, therefore, that everyone in human society will welcome Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, even though it is now presented with so many faults, for it is recommended by Śrī Nārada, who has very kindly appeared in this chapter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The use of words in which, though not perfectly composed, there are the names of the Lord and descriptions of his glories which devotes hear, sing, and again receive, destroys the sins of all people.
Commentary

Having expressed the negative side, now the positive is expressed. The production and use of words or stories (tad-vāg-visargaḥ) which destroy the sins of all people, which are sometimes composed strictly and sometimes carelessly, but with sparse ornaments in the verses (prati-śḷokam abaddhavati), contain names and descriptions of the Lord’s glories. The devotees hear, and having heard, sing, and having sung, again they hear, since they are not fully satiated.

Or if a speaker is present, they hear the glories. If a hearer is present they speak the glories (gṛhanti). And, otherwise, they spontaneously sing the glories. Śridhara Svāmī explains that abaddhavati can also mean ungrammatical language.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.12

↗
నైష్కర్మ్యమప్యచ్యుతభావవర్జితం న శోభతే జ్ఞానమలం నిరఞ్జనమ్ । కుత: పున: శశ్వదభద్రమీశ్వరే న చార్పితం కర్మ యదప్యకారణమ్ ॥ ౧౨ ॥
naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ
[naishkarmyam apy achyuta-bhaava-varjitam]
na śobhate jṣānam alaṁ niraṣjanam
[na shobhate jshaanam alam nirashjanam]
kutaḥ punaḥ śaśvad abhadram īśvare
[kutah punah shashvad abhadram eeshvare]
na cārpitaṁ karma yad apy akāraṇam
[na chaarpitam karma yad apy akaaranam]
naiṣkarmyam — self-realization, being freed from the reactions of fruitive work api — in spite of acyuta — the infallible Lord bhāva — conception varjitam — devoid of na — does not śobhate — look well jṣānam — transcendental knowledge alam — by and by niraṣjanam — free from designations kutaḥ — where is punaḥ — again śaśvat — always abhadram — uncongenial īśvare — unto the Lord na — not ca — and arpitam — offered karma — fruitive work yat api — what is akāraṇam — not fruitive.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ
naiṣkarmyam
self-realization, being freed from the reactions of fruitive work
api
in spite of
acyuta
the infallible Lord
bhāva
conception
varjitam
devoid of
na śobhate jṣānam alaṁ niraṣjanam
na
does not
śobhate
look well
jṣānam
transcendental knowledge
alam
by and by
niraṣjanam
free from designations
kutaḥ punaḥ śaśvad abhadram īśvare
kutaḥ
where is
punaḥ
again
śaśvat
always
abhadram
uncongenial
īśvare
unto the Lord
na cārpitaṁ karma yad apy akāraṇam
na
not
ca
and
arpitam
offered
karma
fruitive work
yat api
what is
akāraṇam
not fruitive.
Knowledge of self-realization, even though free from all material affinity, does not look well if devoid of a conception of the Infallible [God]. What, then, is the use of fruitive activities, which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature, if they are not utilized for the devotional service of the Lord?

As referred to above, not only ordinary literatures devoid of the transcendental glorification of the Lord are condemned, but also Vedic literatures and speculation on the subject of impersonal Brahman when they are devoid of devotional service. When speculation on the impersonal Brahman is condemned on the above ground, then what to speak of ordinary fruitive work, which is not meant to fulfill the aim of devotional service. Such speculative knowledge and fruitive work cannot lead one to the goal of perfection. Fruitive work, in which almost all people in general are engaged, is always painful either in the beginning or at the end. It can be fruitful only when made subservient to the devotional service of the Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā also it is confirmed that the result of such fruitive work may be offered for the service of the Lord, otherwise it leads to material bondage. The bona fide enjoyer of the fruitive work is the Personality of Godhead, and thus when it is engaged for the sense gratification of the living beings, it becomes an acute source of trouble.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Even the stage of jṣāna without the bondage of karma is not glorious if it is devoid of bhakti to the Supreme Lord. What is the use of having destroyed ignorance? What then to speak of sakāma-karma which causes suffering, both during practice and at the stage perfection, and niṣkāma-karma, when not offered to the Lord?
Commentary

Not only are the words important. If there is no bhakti, the work is useless. The realization coming from the words of the Vedas is useless without bhakti, what to speak of mere scriptural knowledge, and what to speak of niṣkāma-karma. And so much more, sakāma-karma is useless without bhakti. Even knowledge devoid of fruitive intentions does not appear wonderful without bhakti, in which one thinks of the Lord who has a form of knowledge and bliss (acyuta-bhāva). Even if bhakti is present in jṣāna and one thinks that the Lord and bhakti are mixed with māyā, then that does not produce liberation. Though devoid of ignorance (niraṣjanam), though one has realized knowledge, what is the use of that knowledge (alam)? What then to speak of unrealized scriptural knowledge! One should not say that you can achieve liberation just by destroying ignorance. By the inconceivable energy of the Lord, the destroyed ignorance again arises. The Pariśiṣtā-vacanam of the Vāsanā-bhāṣya says:

jīvan-muktā api punar bandhanaṁ yānti karmabhiḥ | yady acintya-mahā-śaktau bhagavaty aparādhinaḥ |

Even the liberated persons again get bound by karma if they commit offense against the Lord, possessor of great, inconceivable powers.

There it also says:

jīvan-muktā prapadyante kvacit saṁsāra-vāsanām | yogino na vilipyante karmabhir bhagavat-parāḥ ||

Liberated souls sometimes are subjected to birth and death, but the yogīs who surrender to the Lord are not touched by karma.

Thus the effect of jṣāna is destruction of karma. jṣānāgniḥ sarva-karmāṇi bhasmasāt kurute ’rjuna: O Arjuna, by the fire of knowledge all karmas are burned to ashes. (BG 4.33) But that is not so wonderful because it is also said concerning rathayātrā in Viṣṇu-bhakti-candrodaya of another Purāṇa:

nānuvrajati yo mohād vrajantaṁ jagad-īśvaram | jṣānāgni-dagdha-karmāpi sa bhaved brahma-rākṣasaḥ ||

He who does not follow the Lord in his chariot when he moves becomes a brahma-rakṣasa even though he has destroyed all karmas with the fire of knowledge.

It will also be said later āruhya kṛcchreṇa paraṁ padaṁ tataḥ patanty adho ’nādṛta-yuṣmad-aṅghrayaḥ: after reaching the height of liberation with great difficulty, again they fall down because they do not worship the lotus feet of the Lord. (SB 10.2.32)

Since jṣāna is devoid of real bhakti to the Lord, the offense caused by thinking that the Lord is material is unavoidable. If such jṣāna devoid of bhakti is useless, what then to speak of karma which is filled with desires for enjoyment and which causes suffering (abhadram) at all times (śaśvat)--during practice and at the time of receiving the result. And even if the karma is without the goal of enjoyment (akāraṇam), because it is not offered to the Lord it is not successful.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.13

↗
అథో మహాభాగ భవానమోఘద‍ృక్ శుచిశ్రవా: సత్యరతో ధృతవ్రత: । ఉరుక్రమస్యాఖిలబన్ధముక్తయే సమాధినానుస్మర తద్విచేష్టితమ్ ॥ ౧౩ ॥
atho mahā-bhāga bhavān amogha-dṛk
[atho mahaa-bhaaga bhavaan amogha-drik]
śuci-śravāḥ satya-rato dhṛta-vrataḥ
[shuchi-shravaah satya-rato dhrita-vratah]
urukramasyākhila-bandha-muktaye
[urukramasyaakhila-bandha-muktaye]
samādhinānusmara tad-viceṣṭitam
[samaadhinaanusmara tad-vicheshtitam]
atho — therefore mahā-bhāga — highly fortunate bhavān — yourself amogha-dṛk — the perfect seer śuci — spotless śravāḥ — famous satya-rataḥ — having taken the vow of truthfulness dhṛta-vrataḥ — fixed in spiritual qualities urukramasya — of the one who performs supernatural activities (God) akhila — universal bandha — bondage muktaye — for liberation from samādhinā — by trance anusmara — think repeatedly and then describe them tat-viceṣṭitam — various pastimes of the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atho mahā-bhāga bhavān amogha-dṛk
atho
therefore
mahā-bhāga
highly fortunate
bhavān
yourself
amogha-dṛk
the perfect seer
śuci-śravāḥ satya-rato dhṛta-vrataḥ
śuci
spotless
śravāḥ
famous
satya-rataḥ
having taken the vow of truthfulness
dhṛta-vrataḥ
fixed in spiritual qualities
urukramasyākhila-bandha-muktaye
urukramasya
of the one who performs supernatural activities (God)
akhila
universal
bandha
bondage
muktaye
for liberation from
samādhinānusmara tad-viceṣṭitam
samādhinā
by trance
anusmara
think repeatedly and then describe them
tat-viceṣṭitam
various pastimes of the Lord.
O Vyāsadeva, your vision is completely perfect. Your good fame is spotless. You are firm in vow and situated in truthfulness. And thus you can think of the pastimes of the Lord in trance for the liberation of the people in general from all material bondage.

People in general have a taste for literatures by instinct. They want to hear and read from the authorities something about the unknown, but their taste is exploited by unfortunate literatures which are full of subject matter for satisfaction of the material senses. Such literatures contain different kinds of mundane poems and philosophical speculations, more or less under the influence of māyā, ending in sense gratification. These literatures, although worthless in the true sense of the term, are variously decorated to attract the attention of the less intelligent men. Thus the attracted living entities are more and more entangled in material bondage without hope of liberation for thousands and thousands of generations. Śrī Nārada Ṛṣi, being the best amongst the Vaiṣṇavas, is compassionate toward such unfortunate victims of worthless literatures, and thus he advises Śrī Vyāsadeva to compose transcendental literature which is not only attractive but can also actually bring liberation from all kinds of bondage. Śrīla Vyāsadeva or his representatives are qualified because they are rightly trained to see things in true perspective. Śrīla Vyāsadeva and his representatives are pure in thought due to their spiritual enlightenment, fixed in their vows due to their devotional service, and determined to deliver the fallen souls rotting in material activities. The fallen souls are very eager to receive novel informations every day, and the transcendentalists like Vyāsadeva or Nārada can supply such eager people in general with unlimited news from the spiritual world. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that the material world is only a part of the whole creation and that this earth is only a fragment of the whole material world.

There are thousands and thousands of literary men all over the world, and they have created many, many thousands of literary works for the information of the people in general for thousands and thousands of years. Unfortunately none of them have brought peace and tranquillity on the earth. This is due to a spiritual vacuum in those literatures; therefore the Vedic literatures, especially the Bhagavad-gītā and the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, are specifically recommended to suffering humanity to bring about the desired effect of liberation from the pangs of material civilization, which is eating the vital part of human energy. The Bhagavad-gītā is the spoken message of the Lord Himself recorded by Vyāsadeva, and the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the transcendental narration of the activities of the same Lord Kṛṣṇa, which alone can satisfy the hankering desires of the living being for eternal peace and liberation from miseries. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, therefore, is meant for all the living beings all over the universe for total liberation from all kinds of material bondage. Such transcendental narrations of the pastimes of the Lord can be described only by liberated souls like Vyāsadeva and his bona fide representatives who are completely merged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. Only to such devotees do the pastimes of the Lord and their transcendental nature become automatically manifest by dint of devotional service. No one else can either know or describe the acts of the Lord, even if they speculate on the subject for many, many years. The descriptions of the Bhāgavatam are so precise and accurate that whatever has been predicted in this great literature about five thousand years ago is now exactly happening. Therefore, the vision of the author comprehends past, present and future. Such liberated persons as Vyāsadeva are perfect not only by the power of vision and wisdom, but also in aural reception, in thinking, feeling and all other sense activities. A liberated person possesses perfect senses, and with perfect senses only can one serve the sense proprietor, Hṛṣīkeśa, Śrī Kṛṣṇa the Personality of Godhead. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, therefore, is the perfect description of the all-perfect Personality of Godhead by the all-perfect personality Śrīla Vyāsadeva, the compiler of the Vedas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Fortunate one! Therefore, since you have useful knowledge, spotless character, dedication to truth and determined vows, remember with attention the pastimes of the Lord which bring about liberation from all bondage.
Commentary

Love for Acyuta is most cherished by you since it is topmost. That is attained by chanting and hearing his name, pastimes, etc. The names of Rāma and Kṛṣṇa are famous. How are his pastimes attractive to you? Please teach the world about those pastimes. Your knowledge is useful (amogha-dṛk). Your character is pure (śuci-sravāḥ). You are devoted to truth (satya-rataḥ) and determined in your vows (dhṛta-vrataḥ). Remember with fixed attention (samādhinā) the various pastimes of the Lord which give liberation for all people or give liberation from all bondage. The word “remember” is used because the pastimes appear spontaneously in the pure mind filled with devotion, since they are all self-revealing, infinite, most confidential, and impossible to speak or receive by any other means. After recollecting the pastimes, please recite them to us. One must also have productive knowledge and pure character. It cannot be otherwise. Because you are a person with pure eyes (amogha-dṛk) and with pure ears (śuci-sravāḥ), you have seen some pastimes with your eyes and heard some with your ears. And by attached mind (satya-rataḥ) and determined intelligence (dhṛta-vrataḥ), you should remember with concentrated attention at this moment some very confidential pastimes which cannot be seen or heard but which you have observed. After remembering them, please tell them to us. Anusmara is in the second person instead of saying “one should remember” because of the distinctiveness of the statement.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.14

↗
తతోఽన్యథా కిఞ్చన యద్వివక్షత: పృథగ్దృశస్తత్కృతరూపనామభి: । న కర్హిచిత్క్వాపి చ దు:స్థితా మతి- ర్లభేత వాతాహతనౌరివాస్పదమ్ ॥ ౧౪ ॥
tato ’nyathā kiṣcana yad vivakṣataḥ
[tato ’nyathaa kishchana yad vivakshatah]
pṛthag dṛśas tat-kṛta-rūpa-nāmabhiḥ
[prithag drishas tat-krita-roopa-naamabhih]
na karhicit kvāpi ca duḥsthitā matir
[na karhichit kvaapi cha duhsthitaa matir]
labheta vātāhata-naur ivāspadam
[labheta vaataahata-naur ivaaspadam]
tataḥ — from that anyathā — apart kiṣcana — something yat — whatsoever vivakṣataḥ — desiring to describe pṛthak — separately dṛśaḥ — vision tat-kṛta — reactionary to that rūpa — form nāmabhiḥ — by names na karhicit — never kvāpi — any ca — and duḥsthitā matiḥ — oscillating mind labheta — gains vāta-āhata — troubled by the wind nauḥ — boat iva — like āspadam — place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato ’nyathā kiṣcana yad vivakṣataḥ
tataḥ
from that
anyathā
apart
kiṣcana
something
yat
whatsoever
vivakṣataḥ
desiring to describe
pṛthag dṛśas tat-kṛta-rūpa-nāmabhiḥ
pṛthak
separately
dṛśaḥ
vision
tat-kṛta
reactionary to that
rūpa
form
nāmabhiḥ
by names
na karhicit kvāpi ca duḥsthitā matir
na karhicit
never
kvāpi
any
ca
and
duḥsthitā matiḥ
oscillating mind
labheta vātāhata-naur ivāspadam
labheta
gains
vāta-āhata
troubled by the wind
nauḥ
boat
iva
like
āspadam
place.
Whatever you desire to describe that is separate in vision from the Lord simply reacts, with different forms, names and results, to agitate the mind, as the wind agitates a boat which has no resting place.

Śrī Vyāsadeva is the editor of all descriptions of the Vedic literatures, and thus he has described transcendental realization in different ways, namely by fruitive activities, speculative knowledge, mystic power and devotional service. Besides that, in his various Purāṇas he has recommended the worship of so many demigods in different forms and names. The result is that people in general are puzzled how to fix their minds in the service of the Lord; they are always disturbed about finding the real path of self-realization. Śrīla Nāradadeva is stressing this particular defect in the Vedic literatures compiled by Vyāsadeva, and thus he is trying to emphasize describing everything in relation with the Supreme Lord, and no one else. In fact, there is nothing existent except the Lord. The Lord is manifested in different expansions. He is the root of the complete tree. He is the stomach of the complete body. Pouring water on the root is the right process to water the tree, as much as feeding the stomach supplies energy to all parts of the body. Therefore, Śrīla Vyāsadeva should not have compiled any Purāṇas other than the Bhāgavata Purāṇa because a slight deviation from that may create havoc for self-realization. If a slight deviation can create such havoc, then what to speak of deliberate expansion of the ideas separate from the Absolute Truth Personality of Godhead. The most defective part of worshiping demigods is that it creates a definite conception of pantheism, ending disastrously in many religious sects detrimental to the progress of the principles of the Bhāgavatam, which alone can give the accurate direction for self-realization in eternal relation with the Personality of Godhead by devotional service in transcendental love. The example of the boat disturbed by whirling wind is suitable in this respect. The diverted mind of the pantheist can never reach the perfection of self-realization, due to the disturbed condition of the selection of object.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The intelligence of people desiring to speak on other subjects, who develop another vision, become disturbed by the words describing these other objects, and can never attain its proper object. It is like a boat attacked by the wind.
Commentary

The positive statement having been made, the negative version is now expressed. Some people desire to speak about topics other than the pastimes of the Lord. Having desired, they speak, and having spoken someone hears from them. And this causes a different type of vision. For persons having a vision of objects other than the lord’s pastimes resulting from desire to speak about other things, the intelligence, disturbed by words (nāmabhiḥ) describing other objects (rūpa) produced by the different vision, at no time and at no place can attain its destination. It is like a boat beaten by the wind. Being turned about by the wind and going in various directions, struck by the wind, it sinks. Similarly the intelligence is destroyed because of skilful words, poetry, karma and jṣāna.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.15

↗
జుగుప్సితం ధర్మకృతేఽనుశాసత: స్వభావరక్తస్య మహాన్ వ్యతిక్రమ: । యద్వాక్యతో ధర్మ ఇతీతర: స్థితో న మన్యతే తస్య నివారణం జన: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
jugupsitaṁ dharma-kṛte ’nuśāsataḥ
[jugupsitam dharma-krite ’nushaasatah]
svabhāva-raktasya mahān vyatikramaḥ
[svabhaava-raktasya mahaan vyatikramah]
yad-vākyato dharma itītaraḥ sthito
[yad-vaakyato dharma iteetarah sthito]
na manyate tasya nivāraṇaṁ janaḥ
[na manyate tasya nivaaranam janah]
jugupsitam — verily condemned dharma-kṛte — for the matter of religion anuśāsataḥ — instruction svabhāva-raktasya — naturally inclined mahān — great vyatikramaḥ — unreasonable yat-vākyataḥ — under whose instruction dharmaḥ — religion iti — it is thus itaraḥ — the people in general sthitaḥ — fixed na — do not manyate — think tasya — of that nivāraṇam — prohibition janaḥ — they.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jugupsitaṁ dharma-kṛte ’nuśāsataḥ
jugupsitam
verily condemned
dharma-kṛte
for the matter of religion
svabhāva-raktasya mahān vyatikramaḥ
anuśāsataḥ
instruction
svabhāva-raktasya
naturally inclined
mahān
great
vyatikramaḥ
unreasonable
yad-vākyato dharma itītaraḥ sthito
yat-vākyataḥ
under whose instruction
dharmaḥ
religion
iti
it is thus
itaraḥ
the people in general
sthitaḥ
fixed
na manyate tasya nivāraṇaṁ janaḥ
na
do not
manyate
think
tasya
of that
nivāraṇam
prohibition
janaḥ
they.
The people in general are naturally inclined to enjoy, and you have encouraged them in that way in the name of religion. This is verily condemned and is quite unreasonable. Because they are guided under your instructions, they will accept such activities in the name of religion and will hardly care for prohibitions.

Śrīla Vyāsadeva’s compilation of different Vedic literatures on the basis of regulated performances of fruitive activities as depicted in the Mahābhārata and other literature is condemned herewith by Śrīla Nārada. The human beings, by long material association, life after life, have a natural inclination, by practice, to endeavor to lord it over material energy. They have no sense of the responsibility of human life. This human form of life is a chance to get out of the clutches of illusory matter. The Vedas are meant for going back to Godhead, going back home. To revolve in the cycle of transmigration in a series of lives numbering 8,400,000 is an imprisoned life for the condemned conditioned souls. The human form of life is a chance to get out of this imprisoned life, and as such the only occupation of the human being is to reestablish his lost relationship with God. Under the circumstances, one should never be encouraged in making a plan for sense enjoyment in the name of religious functions. Such diversion of the human energy results in a misguided civilization. Śrīla Vyāsadeva is the authority in Vedic explanations in the Mahābhārata, etc., and his encouragement in sense enjoyment in some form or other is a great barrier for spiritual advancement because the people in general will not agree to renounce material activities which hold them in material bondage. At a certain stage of human civilization when such material activities in the name of religion (as sacrificing animals in the name of yajṣa ) were too much rampant, the Lord incarnated Himself as Buddha and decried the authority of the Vedas in order to stop animal sacrifice in the name of religion. This was foreseen by Nārada, and therefore he condemned such literatures. The flesh-eaters still continue to perform animal sacrifice before some demigod or goddess in the name of religion because in some of the Vedic literatures such regulated sacrifices are recommended. They are so recommended to discourage flesh-eating, but gradually the purpose of such religious activities is forgotten, and the slaughterhouse becomes prominent. This is because foolish materialistic men do not care to listen to others who are actually in a position to explain the Vedic rites.

In the Vedas it is distinctly said that the perfection of life is never to be attained either by voluminous work, or by accumulation of wealth or even by increasing the population. But it is so attained only by renunciation. The materialistic men do not care to listen to such injunctions. According to them, the so-called renounced order of life is meant for those who are unable to earn their livelihood because of some corporeal defects, or for persons who have failed to achieve prosperity in family life.

In histories like the Mahābhārata, of course, there are topics on transcendental subjects along with material topics. The Bhagavad-gītā is there in the Mahābhārata. The whole idea of the Mahābhārata culminates in the ultimate instructions of the Bhagavad-gītā, that one should relinquish all other engagements and should engage oneself solely and fully in surrendering unto the lotus feet of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. But men with materialistic tendencies are more attracted to the politics, economics and philanthropic activities mentioned in the Mahābhārata than to the principal topic, namely the Bhagavad-gītā. This compromising spirit of Vyāsadeva is directly condemned by Nārada, who advises him to directly proclaim that the prime necessity of human life is to realize one’s eternal relation with the Lord and thus surrender unto Him without delay.

A patient suffering from a particular type of malady is almost always inclined to accept eatables which are forbidden for him. The expert physician does not make any compromise with the patient by allowing him to take partially what he should not at all take. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is also said that a man attached to fruitive work should not be discouraged from his occupation, for gradually he may be elevated to the position of self-realization. This is sometimes applicable for those who are only dry empiric philosophers without spiritual realization. But those who are in the devotional line need not be always so advised.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You have created a great disturbance by teaching a s condemned subject to people attached to material enjoyment in order to make them accept dharma. Thinking that what you have taught is real dharma, they do not consider giving it up.
Commentary

“I wrote the Mahābhārata and other works so that people could hear the glories of the Lord, but I have first presented material happiness in these works in order to promote scriptures to materialistic persons who do not want bhakti. But that is not my real intention. The proof is Vidura’s words:

munir vivakṣur bhagavad-guṇānāṁ sakhāpi te bhāratam āha kṛṣṇaḥ | yasminn nṛṇāṁ grāmya-sukhānuvādair matir gṛhītān hareḥ kathāyām ||

O sage! Your friend Vedavyāsa desiring to describe the qualities of the Lord, wrote Mahābhārata. In that work he attracted men's attention to topics of the Lord through topics about material happiness. SB 3.5.12

That is true. As Vidura said, in order to make people accept worship of the Lord (dharma-kṛte) you have taught what is condemned, karma (jugupsitam). A great disturbance has come about for materialistic people who are attached to enjoy from impressions arising for sense objects (svabhāva-raktasya) because you have taught material dharma. But though your intention was to help them, you have actually injured them. How? Because materially minded men (prākṛtaḥ) ascertaining what you explained to be the correct path (dharma iti)—thinking that it is not a fault to offer meat to the devatās and pitṛs, do not consider giving up that path, and do not consider what is actually to be done: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇam vraja. They think that this statement is not part of the path you have outlined for enjoyment. Bhaṭṭa has said the following in relation to a different topic:

tatraivaṁ śakyate vaktuṁ ye’nye paṅgv-ādayo narāḥ | gṛhasthatvaṁ na śakyante kartuṁ teṣām ayaṁ vidhiḥ || naiṣṭhika-brahmacaryaṁ vā parivrājakatāthavā | tair avaśyaṁ gṛhītavyā tenādāv etad ucyate ||

It should be said that this instruction is for those who cannot follow household life such as disabled persons. Such persons only must take vows of permanent brahmacarya or sannyāsa. Thus this is explained in the beginning.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.16

↗
విచక్షణోఽస్యార్హతి వేదితుం విభో- రనన్తపారస్య నివృత్తిత: సుఖమ్ । ప్రవర్తమానస్య గుణైరనాత్మన- స్తతో భవాన్దర్శయ చేష్టితం విభో: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
vicakṣaṇo ’syārhati vedituṁ vibhor
[vichakshano ’syaarhati veditum vibhor]
ananta-pārasya nivṛttitaḥ sukham
[ananta-paarasya nivrittitah sukham]
pravartamānasya guṇair anātmanas
[pravartamaanasya gunair anaatmanas]
tato bhavān darśaya ceṣṭitaṁ vibhoḥ
[tato bhavaan darshaya cheshtitam vibhoh]
vicakṣaṇaḥ — very expert asya — of him arhati — deserves veditum — to understand vibhoḥ — of the Lord ananta-pārasya — of the unlimited nivṛttitaḥ — retired from sukham — material happiness pravartamānasya — those who are attached to guṇaiḥ — by the material qualities anātmanaḥ — devoid of knowledge in spiritual value tataḥ — therefore bhavān — Your Goodness darśaya — show the ways ceṣṭitam — activities vibhoḥ — of the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vicakṣaṇo ’syārhati vedituṁ vibhor
vicakṣaṇaḥ
very expert
ananta-pārasya nivṛttitaḥ sukham
asya
of him
pravartamānasya guṇair anātmanas
arhati
deserves
veditum
to understand
tato bhavān darśaya ceṣṭitaṁ vibhoḥ
vibhoḥ
of the Lord
ananta-pārasya
of the unlimited
nivṛttitaḥ
retired from
sukham
material happiness
pravartamānasya
those who are attached to
guṇaiḥ
by the material qualities
anātmanaḥ
devoid of knowledge in spiritual value
tataḥ
therefore
bhavān
Your Goodness
darśaya
show the ways
ceṣṭitam
activities
vibhoḥ
of the Lord.
The Supreme Lord is unlimited. Only a very expert personality, retired from the activities of material happiness, deserves to understand this knowledge of spiritual values. Therefore those who are not so well situated, due to material attachment, should be shown the ways of transcendental realization, by Your Goodness, through descriptions of the transcendental activities of the Supreme Lord.

Theological science is a difficult subject, especially when it deals with the transcendental nature of God. It is not a subject matter to be understood by persons who are too much attached to material activities. Only the very expert, who have almost retired from materialistic activities by culture of spiritual knowledge, can be admitted to the study of this great science. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is clearly stated that out of many hundreds and thousands of men only one person deserves to enter into transcendental realization. And out of many thousands of such transcendentally realized persons, only a few can understand the theological science specifically dealing with God as a person. Śrī Vyāsadeva is therefore advised by Nārada to describe the science of God directly by relating His transcendental activities. Vyāsadeva is himself a personality expert in this science, and he is unattached to material enjoyment. Therefore he is the right person to describe it, and Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Vyāsadeva, is the right person to receive it.

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the topmost theological science, and therefore it can react on the laymen as medicinal doses. Because it contains the transcendental activities of the Lord, there is no difference between the Lord and the literature. The literature is the factual literary incarnation of the Lord. So the laymen can hear the narration of the activities of the Lord. Thereby they are able to associate with the Lord and thus gradually become purified from material diseases. The expert devotees also can discover novel ways and means to convert the nondevotees in terms of particular time and circumstance. Devotional service is dynamic activity, and the expert devotees can find out competent means to inject it into the dull brains of the materialistic population. Such transcendental activities of the devotees for the service of the Lord can bring a new order of life to the foolish society of materialistic men. Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and His subsequent followers exhibited expert dexterity in this connection. By following the same method, one can bring the materialistic men of this age of quarrel into order for peaceful life and transcendental realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wise person, giving up material happiness, can realize the happiness of the Lord who is beyond measure and then take to bhakti, setting an example for others. Describe the pastimes of the Lord for those materialists who are pushed by the guṇas of matter.
Commentary

Please condemn other paths and describe the glories of the Lord only!

It was said in the previous verse that the people devoid of proper discrimination (itaraḥ janaḥ) were certain that you recommended the material path. Now, those people who have discernment (vicakṣaṇaḥ) can understand the happiness of the Lord, giving up material pleasure (nivṛttitaḥ), since the Lord is beyond time (ananta-pārasya) and measurement whereas material pleasure is very limited. Understanding that the happiness of the Lord is unlimited, he will perform bhakti for attaining that happiness. By seeing the preference of the discerning person for bhakti the undiscerning person will also take up the process. Yad yad ācarati śreṣṭhas tat tad evetaro janaḥ: whatever actions the superior person performs others will follow. (BG 3.21) For this reason (tataḥ) describe those pastimes of the Lord. Show the pastimes of the Lord in order to liberate those who are devoid of discrimination (anātmanaḥ), pushed by the guṇas of material nature. O Lord! This address to the Lord implies: “This is possible because that even such a person, giving up all else and performing pure bhakti will attain your bliss.”

Or the verse has another meaning. “But if the people do not think of giving up their path, even now if I follow your instruction and preach bhakti with rejection of all else, they will reject this scripture.” No, it is not so. In this world not all people are undiscerning. Discerning people do exist (vicakṣaṇaḥ) and they can understand the happiness of the Lord who is devoid of an end by time (ananta-pārasya) -- who is even now existing (pra + vartamānasya). Things which are temporary can be measured. He has a body without material guṇas (guṇaiḥ anātmanaḥ), a body of eternity, knowledge and bliss — which is not possible to measure.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.17

↗
త్యక్త్వా స్వధర్మం చరణామ్బుజం హరే- ర్భజన్నపక్‍వోఽథ పతేత్తతో యది । యత్ర క్‍వ వాభద్రమభూదముష్య కిం కో వార్థ ఆప్తోఽభజతాం స్వధర్మత: ॥ ౧౭ ॥
tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer
[tyaktvaa sva-dharmam charanaambujam harer]
bhajann apakvo ’tha patet tato yadi
[bhajann apakvo ’tha patet tato yadi]
yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ
[yatra kva vaabhadram abhood amushya kim]
ko vārtha āpto ’bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ
[ko vaartha aapto ’bhajataam sva-dharmatah]
tyaktvā — having forsaken sva-dharmam — one’s own occupational engagement caraṇa-ambujam — the lotus feet hareḥ — of Hari (the Lord) bhajan — in the course of devotional service apakvaḥ — immature atha — for the matter of patet — falls down tataḥ — from that place yadi — if yatra — whereupon kva — what sort of vā — or (used sarcastically) abhadram — unfavorable abhūt — shall happen amuṣya — of him kim — nothing kaḥ vā arthaḥ — what interest āptaḥ — obtained abhajatām — of the nondevotee sva-dharmataḥ — being engaged in occupational service.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer
tyaktvā
having forsaken
sva-dharmam
one’s own occupational engagement
caraṇa-ambujam
the lotus feet
hareḥ
of Hari (the Lord)
bhajann apakvo ’tha patet tato yadi
bhajan
in the course of devotional service
apakvaḥ
immature
atha
for the matter of
patet
falls down
tataḥ
from that place
yadi
if
yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ
yatra
whereupon
kva
what sort of
vā
or (used sarcastically)
abhadram
unfavorable
abhūt
shall happen
amuṣya
of him
kim
nothing
kaḥ vā arthaḥ
what interest
ko vārtha āpto ’bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ
āptaḥ
obtained
abhajatām
of the nondevotee
sva-dharmataḥ
being engaged in occupational service.
One who has forsaken his material occupations to engage in the devotional service of the Lord may sometimes fall down while in an immature stage, yet there is no danger of his being unsuccessful. On the other hand, a nondevotee, though fully engaged in occupational duties, does not gain anything.

As far as the duties of mankind are concerned, there are innumerable duties. Every man is duty-bound not only to his parents, family members, society, country, humanity, other living beings, the demigods, etc., but also to the great philosophers, poets, scientists, etc. It is enjoined in the scriptures that one can relinquish all such duties and surrender unto the service of the Lord. So if one does so and becomes successful in the discharge of his devotional service unto the Lord, it is well and good. But it so happens sometimes that one surrenders himself unto the service of the Lord by some temporary sentiment, and in the long run, due to so many other reasons, he falls down from the path of service by undesirable association. There are so many instances of this in the histories. Bharata Mahārāja was obliged to take his birth as a stag due to his intimate attachment to a stag. He thought of this stag when he died. As such, in the next birth he became a stag, although he did not forget the incident of his previous birth. Similarly, Citraketu also fell down due to his offenses at the feet of Śiva. But in spite of all this, the stress is given here to surrendering unto the lotus feet of the Lord, even if there is a chance of falling down, because even though one falls down from the prescribed duties of devotional service, he will never forget the lotus feet of the Lord. Once engaged in the devotional service of the Lord, one will continue the service in all circumstances. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that even a small quantity of devotional service can save one from the most dangerous position. There are many instances of such examples in history. Ajāmila is one of them. Ajāmila in his early life was a devotee, but in his youth he fell down. Still he was saved by the Lord at the end.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If a person having given up his duties in varṇāśrama, begins the worship of the Lord’s lotus feet, and happens to deviate or not reach perfection, there is no misfortune for him at all in the future. But what does the person who follows all duties of varṇāśrama but does not worship the Lord gain?
Commentary

“But Bhagavad-gītā says:

na buddhi-bhedaṁ janayed ajṣānāṁ karma-saṅginām | yojayet sarva-karmāṇi vidvān yuktaḥ samācaran ||

The wise man should not disturb the intelligence of the ignorant attached to results of work. Engaging in all work himself with detachment, he should engage them in activity. BG 3.26

Thus it is forbidden to give up karma.”

That is true. This instruction is given to one who is teaching jṣāna to another person. Practicing jṣāna depends on inner purification, and that purification depends on niṣkāma-karma. This is not an instruction for one teaching another person about bhakti, for bhakti is independently powerful, not depending on prior inner purification. Lord Ajita says:

svayaṁ niḥśreyasaṁ vidvān na vakty ajṣāya karma hi | na rāti rogiṇo ’pathyaṁ vāṣchato ’pi bhiṣaktamaḥ ||

One who knows the highest good will never instruct a foolish person to engage in material enjoyment, just as an experienced physician gives his patient eat food injurious to his health, even if the patient desires it. SB 6.9.50

Therefore the Lord says sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66) and as well:

dharmān santyajya yaḥ sarvān māṁ bhajeta sa tu sattamaḥ

Having taken complete shelter at My lotus feet, however, a saintly person ultimately renounces such ordinary religious duties and worships Me alone. He is thus considered to be the best among all living entities. SB 11.11.32

From the strength of these statements one should teach only bhakti to the Lord, while giving up attachment to daily and periodic duties in varṇāśrama. With this intention the verse is spoken.

Even in the beginning stage of bhakti, practice of karma is forbidden. Having given up ones dharma (tyaktvā svadharmān) even at the beginning stages of bhakti, a person who worships the lotus feet of the Lord will incur no sin by giving up that dharma. This is understood also from the following:

devarṣi-bhūtāpta-nṛṇāṁ pitṝṇāṁ na kiṅkaro nāyam ṛṇī ca rājan sarvātmanā yaḥ śaraṇaṁ śaraṇyaṁ gato mukundaṁ parihṛtya kartam

Anyone who has taken shelter at the lotus feet of Mukunda, the giver of liberation, giving up all kinds of obligation, and has taken to the path in all seriousness, owes neither duties nor obligations to the demigods, sages, general living entities, family members, humankind or forefathers. SB 11.5.41

And if the person dies without being qualified to attain the Lord, or (vā), if while alive falls down because of sinful acts, being attached to material pleasures, even then, there is no misfortune incurred by having given up karmas, because the impressions created by bhakti are indestructible, and remain in subtle form. In such a state one should not revert to performance of karma. Is there any misfortune somewhere (yatra kva), in his next life? No there is no misfortune at all. Vā indicates a remote possibility of falling. It is stated as a concession to the opponent (tuṣyatu durjana nyāya). His falling after leaving the present body is actually not a fall—one does not take a low body because of omitting karmas. This is shown by the following statement of the Lord:

na hy aṅgopakrame dhvaṁso mad-dharmasyoddhavāṇv api mayā vyavasitaḥ samyaṅ nirguṇatvād anāśiṣaḥ

O Uddhava! Because I have personally established it, this process of niṣkāma-bhakti is beyond the guṇas. Even by starting and not completing the process, there is no destruction of results. SB 11.29.20

This is because certainly the sprout of bhakti, being productive, will eventually bear leaves, flowers and fruit. Instead of the present or future verb, the past tense is used (abhūt). This implies a criticism of all those who object (by showing that the fact is already proven). And what is gained from performing all of one’s karmas (sva-dharmataḥ) by persons who do not worship the Lord (abhajatām).

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.18

↗
తస్యైవ హేతో: ప్రయతేత కోవిదో న లభ్యతే యద్భ్రమతాముపర్యధ: । తల్లభ్యతే దు:ఖవదన్యత: సుఖం కాలేన సర్వత్ర గభీరరంహసా ॥ ౧౮ ॥
tasyaiva hetoḥ prayateta kovido
[tasyaiva hetoh prayateta kovido]
na labhyate yad bhramatām upary adhaḥ
[na labhyate yad bhramataam upary adhah]
tal labhyate duḥkhavad anyataḥ sukhaṁ
[tal labhyate duhkhavad anyatah sukham]
kālena sarvatra gabhīra-raṁhasā
[kaalena sarvatra gabheera-ramhasaa]
tasya — for that purpose eva — only hetoḥ — reason prayateta — should endeavor kovidaḥ — one who is philosophically inclined na labhyate — is not obtained yat — what bhramatām — wandering upari adhaḥ — from top to bottom tat — that labhyate — can be obtained duḥkhavat — like the miseries anyataḥ — as a result of previous work sukham — sense enjoyment kālena — in course of time sarvatra — everywhere gabhīra — subtle raṁhasā — progress.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyaiva hetoḥ prayateta kovido
tasya
for that purpose
eva
only
hetoḥ
reason
prayateta
should endeavor
kovidaḥ
one who is philosophically inclined
na labhyate yad bhramatām upary adhaḥ
na labhyate
is not obtained
yat
what
bhramatām
wandering
upari adhaḥ
from top to bottom
tal labhyate duḥkhavad anyataḥ sukhaṁ
tat
that
labhyate
can be obtained
duḥkhavat
like the miseries
anyataḥ
as a result of previous work
sukham
sense enjoyment
kālena sarvatra gabhīra-raṁhasā
kālena
in course of time
sarvatra
everywhere
gabhīra
subtle
raṁhasā
progress.
Persons who are actually intelligent and philosophically inclined should endeavor only for that purposeful end which is not obtainable even by wandering from the topmost planet [Brahmaloka] down to the lowest planet [Pātāla]. As far as happiness derived from sense enjoyment is concerned, it can be obtained automatically in course of time, just as in course of time we obtain miseries even though we do not desire them.

Every man everywhere is trying to obtain the greatest amount of sense enjoyment by various endeavors. Some men are busy engaged in trade, industry, economic development, political supremacy, etc., and some of them are engaged in fruitive work to become happy in the next life by attaining higher planets. It is said that on the moon the inhabitants are fit for greater sense enjoyment by drinking soma-rasa, and the Pitṛloka is obtained by good charitable work. So there are various programs for sense enjoyment, either during this life or in the life after death. Some are trying to reach the moon or other planets by some mechanical arrangement, for they are very anxious to get into such planets without doing good work. But it is not to happen. By the law of the Supreme, different places are meant for different grades of living beings according to the work they have performed. By good work only, as prescribed in the scriptures, can one obtain birth in a good family, opulence, good education and good bodily features. We see also that even in this life one obtains a good education or money by good work. Similarly, in our next birth we get such desirable positions only by good work. Otherwise, it would not so happen that two persons born in the same place at the same time are seen differently placed according to previous work. But all such material positions are impermanent. The positions in the topmost Brahmaloka and in the lowest Pātāla are also changeable according to our own work. The philosophically inclined person must not be tempted by such changeable positions. He should try to get into the permanent life of bliss and knowledge where he will not be forced to come back again to the miserable material world, either in this or that planet. Miseries and mixed happiness are two features of material life, and they are obtained in Brahmaloka and in other lokas also. They are obtained in the life of the demigods and also in the life of the dogs and hogs. The miseries and mixed happiness of all living beings are only of different degree and quality, but no one is free from the miseries of birth, death, old age and disease. Similarly, everyone has his destined happiness also. No one can get more or less of these things simply by personal endeavors. Even if they are obtained, they can be lost again. One should not, therefore, waste time with these flimsy things; one should only endeavor to go back to Godhead. That should be the mission of everyone’s life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wise man strives for that happiness which is not attained by jīvas wandering from Brahma-loka to the lowest species. Material happiness is attained in all cases without endeavor, by the law of karma, just like distress, through the force of fast moving time.
Commentary

“But the śrutis say karmaṇā pitṛ-loka: by karma one goes to Pitṛ-loka (Bṛhad Āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.5); and apām somam amṛtā abhūma: we drank soma and became immortal. (Ṛg Veda 8.48.3) These encourage people to seek happiness of Svarga in the next life. The mercantile people encourage others to seek happiness in this life. How can one promote bhakti for people by rejecting one’s dharma and consequently the happiness in this and next life?

True, but the wise are not deluded by this at all. That is expressed in this verse. A person with discrimination (kovidaḥ) should endeavor for that cause which is not attained by the jīvas wandering up to Brahma-loka or down to non-moving bodies. But there material happiness is attained without endeavor (anyataḥ), due to ancient karmas, even being born as pigs or being born in hell, just as distress is also attained without endeavor (duḥkhavat). It is said:

aprārthitāni duḥkhāni yathaivāyānti dehinām | sukhāny api tathā manye dainyam atrātiricyate ||

Just as one does not pray for misery, and it nevertheless comes to all creatures, in the same way happiness predominates over suffering.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.19

↗
న వై జనో జాతు కథఞ్చనావ్రజే- న్ముకున్దసేవ్యన్యవదఙ్గ సంసృతిమ్ । స్మరన్ముకున్దాఙ్‌ఘ్ర్యురపగూహనం పున- ర్విహాతుమిచ్ఛేన్న రసగ్రహో జన: ॥ ౧౯ ॥
na vai jano jātu kathaṣcanāvrajen
[na vai jano jaatu kathashchanaavrajen]
mukunda-sevy anyavad aṅga saṁsṛtim
[mukunda-sevy anyavad anga samsritim]
smaran mukundāṅghry-upagūhanaṁ punar
[smaran mukundaanghry-upagoohanam punar]
vihātum icchen na rasa-graho janaḥ
[vihaatum ichchen na rasa-graho janah]
na — never vai — certainly janaḥ — a person jātu — at any time kathaṣcana — somehow or other āvrajet — does not undergo mukunda-sevī — the devotee of the Lord anyavat — like others aṅga — O my dear saṁsṛtim — material existence smaran — remembering mukunda-aṅghri — the lotus feet of the Lord upagūhanam — embracing punaḥ — again vihātum — willing to give up icchet — desire na — never rasa-grahaḥ — one who has relished the mellow janaḥ — person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na vai jano jātu kathaṣcanāvrajen
na
never
vai
certainly
janaḥ
a person
jātu
at any time
kathaṣcana
somehow or other
āvrajet
does not undergo
mukunda-sevy anyavad aṅga saṁsṛtim
mukunda-sevī
the devotee of the Lord
anyavat
like others
aṅga
O my dear
saṁsṛtim
material existence
smaran mukundāṅghry-upagūhanaṁ punar
smaran
remembering
mukunda-aṅghri
the lotus feet of the Lord
upagūhanam
embracing
punaḥ
again
vihātum icchen na rasa-graho janaḥ
vihātum
willing to give up
icchet
desire
na
never
rasa-grahaḥ
one who has relished the mellow
janaḥ
person.
My dear Vyāsa, even though a devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa sometimes falls down somehow or other, he certainly does not undergo material existence like others [fruitive workers, etc.] because a person who has once relished the taste of the lotus feet of the Lord can do nothing but remember that ecstasy again and again.

A devotee of the Lord automatically becomes uninterested in the enchantment of material existence because he is rasa-graha, or one who has tasted the sweetness of the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa. There are certainly many instances where devotees of the Lord have fallen down due to uncongenial association, just like fruitive workers, who are always prone to degradation. But even though he falls down, a devotee is never to be considered the same as a fallen karmī. A karmī suffers the result of his own fruitive reactions, whereas a devotee is reformed by chastisement directed by the Lord Himself. The sufferings of an orphan and the sufferings of a beloved child of a king are not one and the same. An orphan is really poor because he has no one to take care of him, but a beloved son of a rich man, although he appears to be on the same level as the orphan, is always under the vigilance of his capable father. A devotee of the Lord, due to wrong association, sometimes imitates the fruitive workers. The fruitive workers want to lord it over the material world. Similarly, a neophyte devotee foolishly thinks of accumulating some material power in exchange for devotional service. Such foolish devotees are sometimes put into difficulty by the Lord Himself. As a special favor, He may remove all material paraphernalia. By such action, the bewildered devotee is forsaken by all friends and relatives, and so he comes to his senses again by the mercy of the Lord and is set right to execute his devotional service.

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is also said that such fallen devotees are given a chance to take birth in a family of highly qualified brāhmaṇas or in a rich mercantile family. A devotee in such a position is not as fortunate as one who is chastised by the Lord and put into a position seemingly of helplessness. The devotee who becomes helpless by the will of the Lord is more fortunate than those who are born in good families. The fallen devotees born in a good family may forget the lotus feet of the Lord because they are less fortunate, but the devotee who is put into a forlorn condition is more fortunate because he swiftly returns to the lotus feet of the Lord, thinking himself helpless all around.

Pure devotional service is so spiritually relishable that a devotee becomes automatically uninterested in material enjoyment. That is the sign of perfection in progressive devotional service. A pure devotee continuously remembers the lotus feet of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and does not forget Him even for a moment, not even in exchange for all the opulence of the three worlds.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! The person who serves Mukunda will never under any condition return to the material world, unlike practitioners of other processes. Remembering the embrace of the Lord’s lotus feet, eager for that taste he has experienced, he will not desire to give up those feet again.
Commentary

This verse elaborates the point that there is no misfortune for the devotee. Even if overcome because of poor determination, the person who serves Mukunda neverna jātu), returns to saṁsāra, the place for enjoying the results of karma, whereas those practicing karma (anyavat) return. That is because he does not experience happiness and distress from karmas, since he experiences only the fruit of happiness and distress directly given by the Lord.

tvad avagamī na vetti bhavad-uttha-śubhāśubhayor

When a person realizes You, he no longer cares about his good and bad fortune arising from past pious and sinful acts, since it is You alone who control this good and bad fortune. SB 10.87.40

Na karma-bandhanam janma vaiṣṇavānām ca vidyate

The Vaiṣṇavas do not have rebirth caused by karma. Padma Purāṇa

Remembering from previous practice alone the mental embrace (upagūhanam) of the Lord’s lotus feet, he has no desire to give that up. The verse does not say “remembering his lotus feet” but rather “remembering the embrace of his lotus feet.” And the word “again” is used. The implication of these two words is that even though he may give up by his own choice the worship, once, twice or three times because of poor determination, after some time, by remembering his previous state of bliss from remembering the Lord and also remembering his present state of distress from not remembering the Lord, he repents. “Oh! Oh! What have I foolishly done? Let that be. I will not again abandon worship of Lord.” He again begins worshipping the Lord.

The verse also uses the phrase “does not desire to give up” instead of “does not give up.” This implies that he desires that he be devoid of pride in his practice. The accomplishment is in the hands of the Lord. The cause of not desiring to give up is then mentioned. Rasa-graha means one who is eager for tasting, or one who has a taste which is something like a ghost which cannot be given up, “haunted by rasa.” The meaning is then that worship after the stages of niṣthā, ruci and āsakti, becomes actual rasa at the stage of rati. However, even from the first day of worshipping the Lord, there is certainly a portion of tasting rasa in a very covered form. Thus it is said:

bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktir anyatra caiṣa trika eka-kālaḥ prapadyamānasya yathāśnataḥ syus tuṣṭiḥ puṣṭiḥ kṣud-apāyo ’nu-ghāsam

Devotion, direct experience of the Supreme Lord, and detachment from other things-these three occur simultaneously for one who has taken shelter of Kṛṣṇa, in the same way that pleasure, fullness of the stomach and relief from hunger are experienced simultaneously, with each bite, for a person engaged in eating. SB 11.2.42

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.20

↗
ఇదం హి విశ్వం భగవానివేతరో యతో జగత్స్థాననిరోధసమ్భవా: । తద్ధి స్వయం వేద భవాంస్తథాపి తే ప్రాదేశమాత్రం భవత: ప్రదర్శితమ్ ॥ ౨౦ ॥
idaṁ hi viśvaṁ bhagavān ivetaro
[idam hi vishvam bhagavaan ivetaro]
yato jagat-sthāna-nirodha-sambhavāḥ
[yato jagat-sthaana-nirodha-sambhavaah]
tad dhi svayaṁ veda bhavāṁs tathāpi te
[tad dhi svayam veda bhavaams tathaapi te]
prādeśa-mātraṁ bhavataḥ pradarśitam
[praadesha-maatram bhavatah pradarshitam]
idam — this hi — all viśvam — cosmos bhagavān — the Supreme Lord iva — almost the same itaraḥ — different from yataḥ — from whom jagat — the worlds sthāna — exist nirodha — annihilation sambhavāḥ — creation tat hi — all about svayam — personally veda — know bhavān — your good self tathā api — still te — unto you prādeśa-mātram — a synopsis only bhavataḥ — unto you pradarśitam — explained.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
idaṁ hi viśvaṁ bhagavān ivetaro
idam
this
hi
all
viśvam
cosmos
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
iva
almost the same
yato jagat-sthāna-nirodha-sambhavāḥ
tad dhi svayaṁ veda bhavāṁs tathāpi te
itaraḥ
different from
yataḥ
from whom
jagat
the worlds
sthāna
exist
nirodha
annihilation
prādeśa-mātraṁ bhavataḥ pradarśitam
sambhavāḥ
creation
tat hi
all about
svayam
personally
veda
know
bhavān
your good self
tathā api
still
te
unto you
prādeśa-mātram
a synopsis only
bhavataḥ
unto you
pradarśitam
explained.
The Supreme Lord Personality of Godhead is Himself this cosmos, and still He is aloof from it. From Him only has this cosmic manifestation emanated, in Him it rests, and unto Him it enters after annihilation. Your good self knows all about this. I have given only a synopsis.

For a pure devotee, the conception of Mukunda, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is both personal and impersonal. The impersonal cosmic situation is also Mukunda because it is the emanation of the energy of Mukunda. For example, a tree is a complete unit, whereas the leaves and the branches of the tree are emanated parts and parcels of the tree. The leaves and branches of the tree are also the tree, but the tree itself is neither the leaves nor the branches. The Vedic version that the whole cosmic creation is nothing but Brahman means that since everything is emanating from the Supreme Brahman, nothing is apart from Him. Similarly, the part-and-parcel hands and legs are called the body, but the body as the whole unit is neither the hands nor the legs. The Lord is the transcendental form of eternity, cognition and beauty. And thus the creation of the energy of the Lord appears to be partially eternal, full of knowledge and beautiful also. The captivated conditioned souls under the influence of the external energy, māyā, are therefore entrapped in the network of the material nature. They accept this as all in all, for they have no information of the Lord who is the primeval cause. Nor have they information that the parts and parcels of the body, being detached from the whole body, are no longer the same hand or leg as when attached to the body. Similarly, a godless civilization detached from the transcendental loving service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is just like a detached hand or leg. Such parts and parcels may appear like hands and legs, but they have no efficiency. The devotee of the Lord, Śrīla Vyāsadeva, knows this very well. He is further advised by Śrīla Nārada to expand the idea so that the entrapped conditioned souls may take lessons from him to understand the Supreme Lord as the primeval cause.

According to the Vedic version, the Lord is naturally fully powerful, and thus His supreme energies are always perfect and identical with Him. Both the spiritual and the material skies and their paraphernalia are emanations of the internal and external energies of the Lord. The external energy is comparatively inferior, whereas the internal potency is superior. The superior energy is living force, and therefore she is completely identical, but the external energy, being inert, is partially identical. But both the energies are neither equal to nor greater than the Lord, who is the generator of all energies; such energies are always under His control, exactly as electrical energy, however powerful it may be, is always under the control of the engineer.

The human being and all other living beings are products of His internal energies. Thus the living being is also identical with the Lord. But he is never equal or superior to the Personality of Godhead. The Lord and living beings are all individual persons. With the help of the material energies the living beings are also creating something, but none of their creations are equal or superior to the creations of the Lord. The human being may create a small playful sputnik and may throw it into outer space, but that does not mean that he can create a planet like the earth or moon and float it in the air as the Lord does. Men with a poor fund of knowledge claim to be equal to the Lord. They are never equal to the Lord. This is never to be. The human being, after attaining complete perfection, may achieve a large percentage of the qualities of the Lord (say up to seventy-eight percent), but it is never possible to surpass the Lord or to become equal with Him. In a diseased condition only, the foolish being claims to be one with the Lord and thus becomes misled by the illusory energy. The misguided living beings, therefore, must accept the supremacy of the Lord and agree to render loving service to Him. For this they have been created. Without this, there cannot be any peace or tranquillity in the world. Śrīla Vyāsadeva is advised by Śrīla Nārada to expand this idea in the Bhāgavatam. In the Bhagavad-gītā also the same idea is explained: surrender fully unto the lotus feet of the Lord. That is the only business of the perfect human being.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This universe is the Lord but the Lord is also different from the universe for from him arises the maintenance, destruction and creation of the universe. You know this naturally since you are an avatāra of the Lord. Thus I have shown to you a small portion of bhakti and knowledge concerning the Lord’s power.
Commentary

Having taught about bhakti, now Nārada teaches about knowledge of the worshippable Lord which is necessary for the devotees. This universe is like the Lord: it exists, has life, and a form of bliss, but it is not the Lord’s form of eternity, knowledge and bliss. This is because the Lord’s qualities like existence are eternal, whereas the universes quality of existence is temporary, because the Lord is different from the universe (itaraḥ). How is the Lord like the universe and also different from it? From the Lord, who is the possessor of māyā-śakti, arises the maintenance, destruction and creation of the universe. The universe is described as a form of the Lord in small portion (like the Lord), because it is an effect of the Lord. Because the Lord is the cause, he is different. Because brahman is the cause, the universe is also designated as brahman in the śruti: sarvam khalv idam brahma: this universe is brahman. (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 3.14.1) You know all this spontaneously (svayam) because you are an avatāra of the Lord. Thus I have shown only a small portion, ten fingers (prādeśa-mātram) of bhakti and knowledge of the powers of the Lord who measures more than ten million times a hundred trillion, in order to fulfill the statement ācāryavān puruṣo veda: one who has a teacher knows. (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.14.2) Amara-kośa says prādeśa-tāla-gokarṇās tarjany-ādi-yute tate: prādeśa, tāla and gokarṇa mean a measure from the thumb to the end of the forefinger.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.21

↗
త్వమాత్మనాత్మానమవేహ్యమోఘద‍ృక్ పరస్య పుంస: పరమాత్మన: కలామ్ । అజం ప్రజాతం జగత: శివాయ త- న్మహానుభావాభ్యుదయోఽధిగణ్యతామ్ ॥ ౨౧ ॥
tvam ātmanātmānam avehy amogha-dṛk
[tvam aatmanaatmaanam avehy amogha-drik]
parasya puṁsaḥ paramātmanaḥ kalām
[parasya pumsah paramaatmanah kalaam]
ajaṁ prajātaṁ jagataḥ śivāya tan
[ajam prajaatam jagatah shivaaya tan]
mahānubhāvābhyudayo ’dhigaṇyatām
[mahaanubhaavaabhyudayo ’dhiganyataam]
tvam — yourself ātmanā — by your own self ātmānam — the Supersoul avehi — search out amogha-dṛk — one who has perfect vision parasya — of the Transcendence puṁsaḥ — the Personality of Godhead paramātmanaḥ — of the Supreme Lord kalām — plenary part ajam — birthless prajātam — have taken birth jagataḥ — of the world śivāya — for the well-being tat — that mahā-anubhāva — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa abhyudayaḥ — pastimes adhigaṇya-tām — describe most vividly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvam ātmanātmānam avehy amogha-dṛk
tvam
yourself
ātmanā
by your own self
ātmānam
the Supersoul
avehi
search out
amogha-dṛk
one who has perfect vision
parasya puṁsaḥ paramātmanaḥ kalām
parasya
of the Transcendence
puṁsaḥ
the Personality of Godhead
paramātmanaḥ
of the Supreme Lord
kalām
plenary part
ajaṁ prajātaṁ jagataḥ śivāya tan
ajam
birthless
prajātam
have taken birth
jagataḥ
of the world
śivāya
for the well-being
tat
that
mahānubhāvābhyudayo ’dhigaṇyatām
mahā-anubhāva
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
abhyudayaḥ
pastimes
adhigaṇya-tām
describe most vividly.
Your Goodness has perfect vision. You yourself can know the Supersoul Personality of Godhead because you are present as the plenary portion of the Lord. Although you are birthless, you have appeared on this earth for the well-being of all people. Please, therefore, describe the transcendental pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa more vividly.

Śrīla Vyāsadeva is the empowered plenary portion incarnation of the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. He descended by his causeless mercy to deliver the fallen souls in the material world. The fallen and forgotten souls are detached from the transcendental loving service of the Lord. The living entities are parts and parcels of the Lord, and they are eternally servitors of the Lord. All the Vedic literatures, therefore, are put into systematic order for the benefit of the fallen souls, and it is the duty of the fallen souls to take advantage of such literatures and be freed from the bondage of material existence. Although formally Śrīla Nārada Ṛṣi is his spiritual master, Śrīla Vyāsadeva is not at all dependent on a spiritual master because in essence he is the spiritual master of everyone else. But because he is doing the work of an ācārya, he has taught us by his own conduct that one must have a spiritual master, even though he be God Himself. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, Lord Śrī Rāma and Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, all incarnations of Godhead, accepted formal spiritual masters, although by Their transcendental nature They were cognizant of all knowledge. In order to direct people in general to the lotus feet of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, He Himself in the incarnation of Vyāsadeva is delineating the transcendental pastimes of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You possess useful knowledge! Please understand spontaneously that you were born as a portion of the supreme person, the paramātmā, for the benefit of the world. Therefore please describe the glories of the all powerful Lord.
Commentary

This verse explains how Vyāsa knows spontaneously. O person with useful knowledge (amogha-dṛk)! Therefore (tat) please describe (gaṇyatām) more fully (adhikam) the most auspicious glories (abhyudayaḥ) of the mighty Lord (mahānubhāva)

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.22

↗
ఇదం హి పుంసస్తపస: శ్రుతస్య వా స్విష్టస్య సూక్తస్య చ బుద్ధిదత్తయో: । అవిచ్యుతోఽర్థ: కవిభిర్నిరూపితో యదుత్తమశ్లోకగుణానువర్ణనమ్ ॥ ౨౨ ॥
idaṁ hi puṁsas tapasaḥ śrutasya vā
[idam hi pumsas tapasah shrutasya vaa]
sviṣṭasya sūktasya ca buddhi-dattayoḥ
[svishtasya sooktasya cha buddhi-dattayoh]
avicyuto ’rthaḥ kavibhir nirūpito
[avichyuto ’rthah kavibhir niroopito]
yad-uttamaśloka-guṇānuvarṇanam
[yad-uttamashloka-gunaanuvarnanam]
idam — this hi — certainly puṁsaḥ — of everyone tapasaḥ — by dint of austerities śrutasya — by dint of study of the Vedas vā — or sviṣṭasya — sacrifice sūktasya — spiritual education ca — and buddhi — culture of knowledge dattayoḥ — charity avicyutaḥ — infallible arthaḥ — interest kavibhiḥ — by the recognized learned person nirūpitaḥ — concluded yat — what uttamaśloka — the Lord, who is described by choice poetry guṇa-anuvarṇanam — description of the transcendental qualities of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
idaṁ hi puṁsas tapasaḥ śrutasya vā
idam
this
hi
certainly
puṁsaḥ
of everyone
tapasaḥ
by dint of austerities
śrutasya
by dint of study of the Vedas
vā
or
sviṣṭasya sūktasya ca buddhi-dattayoḥ
sviṣṭasya
sacrifice
sūktasya
spiritual education
ca
and
buddhi
culture of knowledge
dattayoḥ
charity
avicyuto ’rthaḥ kavibhir nirūpito
avicyutaḥ
infallible
yad-uttamaśloka-guṇānuvarṇanam
arthaḥ
interest
kavibhiḥ
by the recognized learned person
nirūpitaḥ
concluded
yat
what
uttamaśloka
the Lord, who is described by choice poetry
guṇa-anuvarṇanam
description of the transcendental qualities of.
Learned circles have positively concluded that the infallible purpose of the advancement of knowledge, namely austerities, study of the Vedas, sacrifice, chanting of hymns and charity, culminates in the transcendental descriptions of the Lord, who is defined in choice poetry.

Human intellect is developed for advancement of learning in art, science, philosophy, physics, chemistry, psychology, economics, politics, etc. By culture of such knowledge the human society can attain perfection of life. This perfection of life culminates in the realization of the Supreme Being, Viṣṇu. The śruti therefore directs that those who are actually advanced in learning should aspire for the service of Lord Viṣṇu. Unfortunately persons who are enamored by the external beauty of viṣṇu-māyā do not understand that culmination of perfection or self-realization depends on Viṣṇu. Viṣṇu-māyā means sense enjoyment, which is transient and miserable. Those who are entrapped by viṣṇu-māyā utilize advancement of knowledge for sense enjoyment. Śrī Nārada Muni has explained that all paraphernalia of the cosmic universe is but an emanation from the Lord out of His different energies because the Lord has set in motion, by His inconceivable energy, the actions and reactions of the created manifestation. They have come to be out of His energy, they rest on His energy, and after annihilation they merge into Him. Nothing is, therefore, different from Him, but at the same time the Lord is always different from them.

When advancement of knowledge is applied in the service of the Lord, the whole process becomes absolute. The Personality of Godhead and His transcendental name, fame, glory, etc., are all nondifferent from Him. Therefore, all the sages and devotees of the Lord have recommended that the subject matter of art, science, philosophy, physics, chemistry, psychology and all other branches of knowledge should be wholly and solely applied in the service of the Lord. Art, literature, poetry, painting, etc., may be used in glorifying the Lord. The fiction writers, poets and celebrated litterateurs are generally engaged in writing of sensuous subjects, but if they turn towards the service of the Lord they can describe the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. Vālmīki was a great poet, and similarly Vyāsadeva is a great writer, and both of them have absolutely engaged themselves in delineating the transcendental activities of the Lord and by doing so have become immortal. Similarly, science and philosophy also should be applied in the service of the Lord. There is no use presenting dry speculative theories for sense gratification. Philosophy and science should be engaged to establish the glory of the Lord. Advanced people are eager to understand the Absolute Truth through the medium of science, and therefore a great scientist should endeavor to prove the existence of the Lord on a scientific basis. Similarly, philosophical speculations should be utilized to establish the Supreme Truth as sentient and all-powerful. Similarly, all other branches of knowledge should always be engaged in the service of the Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā also the same is affirmed. All “knowledge” not engaged in the service of the Lord is but nescience. Real utilization of advanced knowledge is to establish the glories of the Lord, and that is the real import. Scientific knowledge engaged in the service of the Lord, and all similar activities, are all factually hari-kīrtana, or glorification of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The unfailing cause of perfection from men’s austerity, study of the Vedas, performance of sacrifices, chanting of mantras, practicing jṣāna and giving charity is defined by the wise as glorifying the qualities of the Lord.
Commentary

I have said that one becomes successful by bhakti, after giving up all dharmas. Now, if some devotee has some desire for some dharmas, those dharmas will be produced by bhakti. That is now explained. The unfailing cause (avicyutaḥ arthaḥ) of men’s austerity and the other items of dharma has been described to be narrating the qualities of the Lord. Medinī says:

artho viṣayānarthayor dhana-kāraṇa-vastuni | abhidheye ca śabdānāṁ nivṛttau ca prayojane ||

Artha means an object of the senses, obstacle, wealth, cause, thing, meaning of a word, prevention and goal.

The results of austerity and other acts are achieved by bhakti according to the statement of the Lord and thus what is their necessity?

yat karmabhir yat tapasā jṣāna-vairāgyataś ca yat yogena dāna-dharmeṇa śreyobhir itarair api sarvaṁ mad-bhakti-yogena mad-bhakto labhate ’ṣjasā svargāpavargaṁ mad-dhāma kathaṣcid yadi vāṣchati

Everything that can be achieved by karma, penance, jṣāna, vairāgya, mystic yoga, charity, dharma and all other auspicious means of perfecting life is easily achieved by my devotee through bhakti. If somehow or other my devotee desires Svarga, liberation, or residence in my abode, he easily achieves such benedictions. SB 11.20.32-33

smartavyaḥ satataṁ viṣṇur vismartavyo na jātucit | sarve vidhi-niṣedhāḥ syur etayor eva kiṅkarāḥ ||

One should always remember Viṣṇu and never forget Him. All injunctions and prohibitions are dependent on these two principles. Padma Purāṇa

According to this, all dharmas are unnecessary. Or another meaning is because performance of bhakti to the Lord is the conclusion of all the scriptural statements recommending austerity, studying the Vedas etc., chanting the Lord’s name is the unmistakably mentioned process. And in his commentary on the Lord’s words dharmo yasyāṁ mad-ātmakaḥ (SB 11.14.3) Madhusūdana Sarasvatī says that the purport of all scriptural statements is the Supreme Lord.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.23

↗
అహం పురాతీతభవేఽభవం మునే దాస్యాస్తు కస్యాశ్చన వేదవాదినామ్ । నిరూపితో బాలక ఏవ యోగినాం శుశ్రూషణే ప్రావృషి నిర్వివిక్షతామ్ ॥ ౨౩ ॥
ahaṁ purātīta-bhave ’bhavaṁ mune
[aham puraateeta-bhave ’bhavam mune]
dāsyās tu kasyāścana veda-vādinām
[daasyaas tu kasyaashchana veda-vaadinaam]
nirūpito bālaka eva yogināṁ
[niroopito baalaka eva yoginaam]
śuśrūṣaṇe prāvṛṣi nirvivikṣatām
[shushrooshane praavrishi nirvivikshataam]
aham — I purā — formerly atīta-bhave — in the previous millennium abhavam — became mune — O muni dāsyāḥ — of the maidservant tu — but kasyāścana — certain veda-vādinām — of the followers of Vedānta nirūpitaḥ — engaged bālakaḥ — boy servant eva — only yoginām — of the devotees śuśrūṣaṇe — in the service of prāvṛṣi — during the four months of the rainy season nirvivikṣatām — living together.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ahaṁ purātīta-bhave ’bhavaṁ mune
aham
I
purā
formerly
atīta-bhave
in the previous millennium
abhavam
became
mune
O muni
dāsyās tu kasyāścana veda-vādinām
dāsyāḥ
of the maidservant
tu
but
kasyāścana
certain
veda-vādinām
of the followers of Vedānta
nirūpito bālaka eva yogināṁ
nirūpitaḥ
engaged
bālakaḥ
boy servant
eva
only
yoginām
of the devotees
śuśrūṣaṇe prāvṛṣi nirvivikṣatām
śuśrūṣaṇe
in the service of
prāvṛṣi
during the four months of the rainy season
nirvivikṣatām
living together.
O Muni, in the last millennium I was born as the son of a certain maidservant engaged in the service of brāhmaṇas who were following the principles of Vedānta. When they were living together during the four months of the rainy season, I was engaged in their personal service.

The wonder of an atmosphere surcharged with devotional service to the Lord is briefly described herein by Śrī Nārada Muni. He was the son of the most insignificant parentage. He was not properly educated. Still, because his complete energy was engaged in the service of the Lord, he became an immortal sage. Such is the powerful action of devotional service. The living entities are the marginal energy of the Lord, and therefore they are meant for being properly utilized in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. When this is not done, one’s situation is called māyā. Therefore the illusion of māyā is at once dissipated as soon as one’s full energy is converted in the service of the Lord instead of in sense enjoyment. From the personal example of Śrī Nārada Muni in his previous birth, it is clear that the service of the Lord begins with the service of the Lord’s bona fide servants. The Lord says that the service of His servants is greater than His personal service. Service of the devotee is more valuable than the service of the Lord. One should therefore choose a bona fide servant of the Lord constantly engaged in His service, accept such a servant as the spiritual master and engage himself in his (the spiritual master’s) service. Such a spiritual master is the transparent medium by which to visualize the Lord, who is beyond the conception of the material senses. By service of the bona fide spiritual master, the Lord consents to reveal Himself in proportion to the service rendered. Utilization of the human energy in the service of the Lord is the progressive path of salvation. The whole cosmic creation becomes at once identical with the Lord as soon as service in relation with the Lord is rendered under the guidance of a bona fide spiritual master. The expert spiritual master knows the art of utilizing everything to glorify the Lord, and therefore under his guidance the whole world can be turned into the spiritual abode by the divine grace of the Lord’s servant.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In another kalpa of Brahmā in a previous life, I was born as the son of a maidservant engaged by some persons studying the Vedas. Though a child, I was also engaged in serving them during the monsoon season when they decided to stay in one place.
Commentary

There is no cause for pure bhakti other than the fortunate mercy of the devotees of the Lord. Austerity and other processes are not the cause. To illustrate this Nārada recounts a previous birth. In a previous kalpa (day of Brahmā) in a previous birth (atīta-bhave) I was born from a maid servant of some studiers of the Vedas. I was engaged (nirūpitaḥ) in serving those persons having bhakti-yoga and who desired to stay in one place (nirvivikṣatām) during the rainy season. That they also practiced bhakti-yoga is understood later from the following verse:

tatrānvahaṁ kṛṣṇa-kathāḥ pragāyatām anugraheṇāśṛṇavaṁ manoharāḥ tāḥ śraddhayā me ’nupadaṁ viśṛṇvataḥ priyaśravasy aṅga mamābhavad ruciḥ

O Vyāsadeva, in that association and by the mercy of those great Vedāntists, I could hear them describe the attractive activities of Lord Kṛṣṇa And thus listening attentively, my taste for hearing of the Personality of Godhead increased at every step. SB 1.5.26

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.24

↗
తే మయ్యపేతాఖిలచాపలేఽర్భకే దాన్తేఽధృతక్రీడనకేఽనువర్తిని । చక్రు: కృపాం యద్యపి తుల్యదర్శనా: శుశ్రూషమాణే మునయోఽల్పభాషిణి ॥ ౨౪ ॥
te mayy apetākhila-cāpale ’rbhake
[te mayy apetaakhila-chaapale ’rbhake]
dānte ’dhṛta-krīḍanake ’nuvartini
[daante ’dhrita-kreedanake ’nuvartini]
cakruḥ kṛpāṁ yadyapi tulya-darśanāḥ
[chakruh kripaam yadyapi tulya-darshanaah]
śuśrūṣamāṇe munayo ’lpa-bhāṣiṇi
[shushrooshamaane munayo ’lpa-bhaashini]
te — they mayi — unto me apeta — not having undergone akhila — all kinds of cāpale — proclivities arbhake — unto a boy dānte — having controlled the senses adhṛta-krīḍanake — without being accustomed to sporting habits anuvartini — obedient cakruḥ — did bestow kṛpām — causeless mercy yadyapi — although tulya-darśanāḥ — impartial by nature śuśrūṣamāṇe — unto the faithful munayaḥ — the muni followers of the Vedānta alpa-bhāṣiṇi — one who does not speak more than required.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te mayy apetākhila-cāpale ’rbhake
te
they
mayi
unto me
apeta
not having undergone
akhila
all kinds of
cāpale
proclivities
dānte ’dhṛta-krīḍanake ’nuvartini
arbhake
unto a boy
cakruḥ kṛpāṁ yadyapi tulya-darśanāḥ
dānte
having controlled the senses
adhṛta-krīḍanake
without being accustomed to sporting habits
anuvartini
obedient
cakruḥ
did bestow
kṛpām
causeless mercy
yadyapi
although
tulya-darśanāḥ
impartial by nature
śuśrūṣamāṇe munayo ’lpa-bhāṣiṇi
śuśrūṣamāṇe
unto the faithful
munayaḥ
the muni followers of the Vedānta
alpa-bhāṣiṇi
one who does not speak more than required.
Although they were impartial by nature, those followers of the Vedānta blessed me with their causeless mercy. As far as I was concerned, I was self-controlled and had no attachment for sports, even though I was a boy. In addition, I was not naughty, and I did not speak more than required.

In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says, “All the Vedas are searching after Me.” Lord Śrī Caitanya says that in the Vedas the subject matters are only three, namely to establish the relation of the living entities with the Personality of Godhead, perform the relative duties in devotional service and thus achieve the ultimate goal, back to Godhead. As such, vedānta-vādīs, or the followers of the Vedānta, indicate the pure devotees of the Personality of Godhead. Such vedānta-vādīs, or the bhakti-vedāntas, are impartial in distributing the transcendental knowledge of devotional service. To them no one is enemy or friend; no one is educated or uneducated. No one is especially favorable, and no one is unfavorable. The bhakti-vedāntas see that the people in general are wasting time in false sensuous things. Their business is to get the ignorant mass of people to reestablish the lost relationship with the Personality of Godhead. By such endeavor, even the most forgotten soul is roused up to the sense of spiritual life, and thus being initiated by the bhakti-vedāntas, the people in general gradually progress on the path of transcendental realization. So the vedānta-vādīs initiated the boy even before he became self-controlled and was detached from childish sporting, etc. But before the initiation, he (the boy) became more and more advanced in discipline, which is very essential for one who wishes to make progress in the line. In the system of varṇāśrama-dharma, which is the beginning of actual human life, small boys after five years of age are sent to become brahmacārīs at the guru’s āśrama, where these things are systematically taught to every boy, be he a king’s son or the son of an ordinary citizen. The training was compulsory not only to create good citizens of the state but also to prepare the boys’ future life for spiritual realization. The irresponsible life of sense enjoyment was unknown to the children of the followers of the varṇāśrama system. A boy was even injected with spiritual acumen before being placed by the father in the womb of the mother. Both the father and the mother were responsible for the boy’s success in being liberated from the material bondage. That is the process of successful family planning. It is to beget children for complete perfection. Without being self-controlled, without being disciplined and without being fully obedient, no one can become successful in following the instructions of the spiritual master, and without doing so, no one is able to go back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though the sages saw everything equally, they showed mercy to me, by which I, though a boy, developed sense control, gave up child’s play and all agitation, became obedient, served attentively, and spoke little.
Commentary

Nārada had controlled senses (dānte), had given up childish play (adhṛta-kṛiḍanake). Those sages saw equally good-tempered and bad-tempered, those who are praiseworthy and those who are to be criticized, those who have good conduct and those who are sinful (tulya-darśanāḥ), and thus they should not show mercy to one and reject in disgust another. However, they showed mercy to me. Though great devotees such as Bharata and Prahlāda see equally, they also show some partiality concerning giving mercy. Their first show of mercy did not depend on Nārada’s good qualities and show of respect. He developed the good qualities by their mercy. Then those qualities became the cause of further mercy. It must be explained that the cause of their mercy was not due to seeing qualities. If one says that though they had equal vision, they showed mercy because he showed good qualities, then their equal vision would be contradicted by their seeing good and bad qualities. One should not explain in this way because then the first mercy would be prejudiced.

There are two types of mercy; affected by seeing material qualities and not affected by seeing material qualities. The first type of mercy is explained as follows. All persons in the material world have mercy caused by qualities. If they see qualities they show mercy, if the qualities are absent, they withdraw mercy. And if they see bad qualities, they show hatred. The second type of mercy is as follows. Those who are beyond the influence of material world show mercy without such causes, without dependence on seeing material qualities, since they see everything in the material world as the same.

Śukadeva has said:

girayo mumucus toyaṁ kvacin na mumucuḥ śivam yathā jṣānāmṛtaṁ kale jṣānino dadate na vā

During this season the mountains sometimes released their pure water and sometimes did not, just as experts in transcendental science sometimes give the nectar of transcendental knowledge and sometimes do not. SB 10.20.36

In this manner sometimes these persons show mercy to some person. When hardness of the heart caused by guṇas is destroyed and becomes soft by devotion to the Lord, mercy will appear in the heart.

śuddha-sattva-viśeṣātmā prema-sūryāṁśu-sāmya-bhāk | rucibhiś citta-māsṛṇya-kṛd asau bhāva ucyate ||

That part of bhakti is called bhāva, whose essence is saṁvit and hlādinī śakti, which is one ray of the sun of prema which will soon rise in the heart, and which softens the heart with desires to meet, serve, and exchange love with the Lord. Bhaki-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.3.1

The first four stages of bhakti are understood here: mercy of the devotees, service to devotees, faith, and taking shelter of guru.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.25

↗
ఉచ్ఛిష్టలేపాననుమోదితో ద్విజై: సకృత్స్మ భుఞ్జే తదపాస్తకిల్బిష: । ఏవం ప్రవృత్తస్య విశుద్ధచేతస- స్తద్ధర్మ ఏవాత్మరుచి: ప్రజాయతే ॥ ౨౫ ॥
ucchiṣṭa-lepān anumodito dvijaiḥ
[uchchishta-lepaan anumodito dvijaih]
sakṛt sma bhuṣje tad-apāsta-kilbiṣaḥ
[sakrit sma bhushje tad-apaasta-kilbishah]
evaṁ pravṛttasya viśuddha-cetasas
[evam pravrittasya vishuddha-chetasas]
tad-dharma evātma-ruciḥ prajāyate
[tad-dharma evaatma-ruchih prajaayate]
ucchiṣṭa-lepān — the remnants of foodstuff anumoditaḥ — being permitted dvijaiḥ — by the Vedāntist brāhmaṇas sakṛt — once upon a time sma — in the past bhuṣje — took tat — by that action apāsta — eliminated kilbiṣaḥ — all sins evam — thus pravṛttasya — being engaged viśuddha-cetasaḥ — of one whose mind is purified tat — that particular dharmaḥ — nature eva — certainly ātma-ruciḥ — transcendental attraction prajāyate — was manifested.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ucchiṣṭa-lepān anumodito dvijaiḥ
ucchiṣṭa-lepān
the remnants of foodstuff
anumoditaḥ
being permitted
dvijaiḥ
by the Vedāntist brāhmaṇas
sakṛt sma bhuṣje tad-apāsta-kilbiṣaḥ
sakṛt
once upon a time
sma
in the past
bhuṣje
took
tat
by that action
apāsta
eliminated
kilbiṣaḥ
all sins
evaṁ pravṛttasya viśuddha-cetasas
evam
thus
pravṛttasya
being engaged
viśuddha-cetasaḥ
of one whose mind is purified
tat
that particular
tad-dharma evātma-ruciḥ prajāyate
dharmaḥ
nature
eva
certainly
ātma-ruciḥ
transcendental attraction
prajāyate
was manifested.
Once only, by their permission, I took the remnants of their food, and by so doing all my sins were at once eradicated. Thus being engaged, I became purified in heart, and at that time the very nature of the transcendentalist became attractive to me.

Pure devotion is as much infectious, in a good sense, as infectious diseases. A pure devotee is cleared from all kinds of sins. The Personality of Godhead is the purest entity, and unless one is equally pure from the infection of material qualities, one cannot become a pure devotee of the Lord. The bhakti-vedāntas as above mentioned were pure devotees, and the boy became infected with their qualities of purity by their association and by eating once the remnants of the foodstuff taken by them. Such remnants may be taken even without permission of the pure devotees. There are sometimes pseudodevotees, and one should be very much cautious about them. There are many things which hinder one from entering devotional service. But by the association of pure devotees all these obstacles are removed. The neophyte devotee becomes practically enriched with the transcendental qualities of the pure devotee, which means attraction for the Personality of Godhead’s name, fame, qualities, pastimes, etc. Infection of the qualities of the pure devotee means to imbibe the taste of pure devotion always in the transcendental activities of the Personality of Godhead. This transcendental taste at once makes all material things distasteful. Therefore a pure devotee is not at all attracted by material activities. After the elimination of all sins or obstacles on the path of devotional service, one can become attracted, one can have steadiness, one can have perfect taste, one can have transcendental emotions, and at last one can be situated on the plane of loving service of the Lord. All these stages develop by the association of pure devotees, and that is the purport of this stanza.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One time only I happened to eat their food remnants with their permission. All obstacles to bhakti disappeared by that. Having developed an inclination for bhakti, being pure in mind, taste for devotional processes inevitably developed in my mind.
Commentary

After getting permission from them to do so, I ate one time some rice stuck to one of their dishes. By that all obstacles to bhakti were destroyed (tad-apāsta-klibiṣaḥ). Having taken their food, I developed without effort bhakti in the form of hearing, chanting and remembering the Lord continually. Having developed a tendency for bhakti after eating the devotees’ food (evaṁ pravṛttasya), which applies to anyone else as well, I inevitably developed a taste (ruciḥ prajāyate) for hearing and chanting (tad-dharme) in the mind (ātma). By this verse five stages of bhakti should be understood: desire for worship (spṛhā), bhakti, anartha-nivṛtti, niṣṭhā and ruci. [Note: These five stages and the four stages mentioned in the previous commentary are listed first in the commentary on 1.2.21. ]

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.26

↗
తత్రాన్వహం కృష్ణకథా: ప్రగాయతా- మనుగ్రహేణాశ‍ృణవం మనోహరా: । తా: శ్రద్ధయా మేఽనుపదం విశ‍ృణ్వత: ప్రియశ్రవస్యఙ్గ మమాభవద్రుచి: ॥ ౨౬ ॥
tatrānvahaṁ kṛṣṇa-kathāḥ pragāyatām
[tatraanvaham krishna-kathaah pragaayataam]
anugraheṇāśṛṇavaṁ manoharāḥ
[anugrahenaashrinavam manoharaah]
tāḥ śraddhayā me ’nupadaṁ viśṛṇvataḥ
[taah shraddhayaa me ’nupadam vishrinvatah]
priyaśravasy aṅga mamābhavad ruciḥ
[priyashravasy anga mamaabhavad ruchih]
tatra — thereupon anu — every day aham — I kṛṣṇa-kathāḥ — narration of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s activities pragāyatām — describing anugraheṇa — by causeless mercy aśṛṇavam — giving aural reception manaḥ-harāḥ — attractive tāḥ — those śraddhayā — respectfully me — unto me anupadam — every step viśṛṇvataḥ — hearing attentively priyaśravasi — of the Personality of Godhead aṅga — O Vyāsadeva mama — mine abhavat — it so became ruciḥ — taste.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatrānvahaṁ kṛṣṇa-kathāḥ pragāyatām
tatra
thereupon
anu
every day
aham
I
kṛṣṇa-kathāḥ
narration of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s activities
pragāyatām
describing
anugraheṇāśṛṇavaṁ manoharāḥ
anugraheṇa
by causeless mercy
aśṛṇavam
giving aural reception
manaḥ-harāḥ
attractive
tāḥ śraddhayā me ’nupadaṁ viśṛṇvataḥ
tāḥ
those
śraddhayā
respectfully
me
unto me
priyaśravasy aṅga mamābhavad ruciḥ
anupadam
every step
viśṛṇvataḥ
hearing attentively
priyaśravasi
of the Personality of Godhead
aṅga
O Vyāsadeva
mama
mine
abhavat
it so became
ruciḥ
taste.
O Vyāsadeva, in that association and by the mercy of those great Vedāntists, I could hear them describe the attractive activities of Lord Kṛṣṇa. And thus listening attentively, my taste for hearing of the Personality of Godhead increased at every step.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Absolute Personality of Godhead, is attractive not only in His personal features, but also in His transcendental activities. It is so because the Absolute is absolute by His name, fame, form, pastimes, entourage, paraphernalia, etc. The Lord descends to this material world out of His causeless mercy and displays His various transcendental pastimes as a human being so that human beings attracted towards Him become able to go back to Godhead. Men are naturally apt to hear histories and narrations of various personalities performing mundane activities, without knowing that by such association one simply wastes valuable time and also becomes addicted to the three qualities of mundane nature. Instead of wasting time, one can get spiritual success by turning his attention to the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. By hearing the narration of the pastimes of the Lord, one contacts directly the Personality of Godhead, and, as explained before, by hearing about the Personality of Godhead, from within, all accumulated sins of the mundane creature are cleared. Thus being cleared of all sins, the hearer gradually becomes liberated from mundane association and becomes attracted to the features of the Lord. Nārada Muni has just explained this by his personal experience. The whole idea is that simply by hearing about the Lord’s pastimes one can become one of the associates of the Lord. Nārada Muni has eternal life, unlimited knowledge and unfathomed bliss, and he can travel all over the material and spiritual worlds without restriction. One can attain to the highest perfection of life simply by attentive hearing of the transcendental pastimes of the Lord from the right sources, as Śrī Nārada heard them from the pure devotees ( bhakti-vedāntas ) in his previous life. This process of hearing in the association of the devotees is especially recommended in this age of quarrel (Kali).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By the mercy of the sages who were chanting about the attractive pastimes of Kṛṣṇa daily, I heard about Kṛṣṇa in that place with āsakti. Hearing constantly, I then developed rati for Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

Śraddha here indicates the tenth stage āsakti. At every moment or at hearing every word, I developed rati (bhāva) for Kṛṣṇa, whose qualities are pleasing to hear (priya-śravasi). Ruci should here mean rati, the eleventh stage, since the stage of ruci has already been mentioned in the previous verse.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.27

↗
తస్మింస్తదా లబ్ధరుచేర్మహామతే ప్రియశ్రవస్యస్ఖలితా మతిర్మమ । యయాహమేతత్సదసత్స్వమాయయా పశ్యే మయి బ్రహ్మణి కల్పితం పరే ॥ ౨౭ ॥
tasmiṁs tadā labdha-rucer mahā-mate
[tasmims tadaa labdha-rucher mahaa-mate]
priyaśravasy askhalitā matir mama
[priyashravasy askhalitaa matir mama]
yayāham etat sad-asat sva-māyayā
[yayaaham etat sad-asat sva-maayayaa]
paśye mayi brahmaṇi kalpitaṁ pare
[pashye mayi brahmani kalpitam pare]
tasmin — it being so tadā — at that time labdha — achieved ruceḥ — taste mahā-mate — O great sage priyaśravasi — upon the Lord askhalitā matiḥ — uninterrupted attention mama — mine yayā — by which aham — I etat — all these sat-asat — gross and subtle sva-māyayā — one’s own ignorance paśye — see mayi — in me brahmaṇi — the Supreme kalpitam — is accepted pare — in the Transcendence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmiṁs tadā labdha-rucer mahā-mate
tasmin
it being so
tadā
at that time
labdha
achieved
ruceḥ
taste
mahā-mate
O great sage
priyaśravasy askhalitā matir mama
priyaśravasi
upon the Lord
askhalitā matiḥ
uninterrupted attention
mama
mine
yayāham etat sad-asat sva-māyayā
yayā
by which
aham
I
etat
all these
sat-asat
gross and subtle
sva-māyayā
one’s own ignorance
paśye mayi brahmaṇi kalpitaṁ pare
paśye
see
mayi
in me
brahmaṇi
the Supreme
kalpitam
is accepted
pare
in the Transcendence.
O great sage, as soon as I got a taste of the Personality of Godhead, my attention to hear of the Lord was unflinching. And as my taste developed, I could realize that it was only in my ignorance that I had accepted gross and subtle coverings, for both the Lord and I are transcendental.

Ignorance in material existence is compared to darkness, and in all Vedic literatures the Personality of Godhead is compared to the sun. Wherever there is light there cannot be darkness. Hearing of the Lord’s pastimes is itself transcendental association with the Lord because there is no difference between the Lord and His transcendental pastimes. To become associated with the supreme light is to dissipate all ignorance. By ignorance only, the conditioned soul wrongly thinks that both he and the Lord are products of material nature. But in fact the Personality of Godhead and the living beings are transcendental, and they have nothing to do with the material nature. When ignorance is removed and it is perfectly realized that there is nothing existing without the Personality of Godhead, then nescience is removed. Since the gross and subtle bodies are emanations from the Personality of Godhead, the knowledge of light permits one to engage both of them in the service of the Lord. The gross body should be engaged in acts of rendering service to the Lord (as in bringing water, cleansing the temple or making obeisances, etc.). The path of arcanā, or worshiping the Lord in the temple, involves engaging one’s gross body in the service of the Lord. Similarly, the subtle mind should be engaged in hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Lord, thinking about them, chanting His name, etc. All such activities are transcendental. None of the gross or subtle senses should otherwise be engaged. Such realization of transcendental activities is made possible by many, many years of apprenticeship in the devotional service, but simply attraction of love for the Personality of Godhead, as it was developed in Nārada Muni, by hearing, is highly effective.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having attained an excellent taste for the Lord, my intelligence did not waver from the Lord. By my intelligence, I directly experienced that my gross and subtle bodies created by the Lord’s material energy were fixed only in the Supreme Lord.
Commentary

Having attained an excellent taste, my intelligence became steadily fixed in the Lord. By that intelligence I saw the gross and subtle body (sad-asat) existing in me by the influence of the Lord’s material energy to be established in Kṛṣṇa (brahmaṇi). The gross body became fixed in offering respects, carrying the Lord’s water pot and other actions, not in material actions for oneself. The subtle body with senses such as ear, eye, mind and intelligence became fixed in tasting the sweetness of the lord’s qualities and form, not in material objects for one’s own pleasure. Previously the eye and mind were not fixed in the Lord even by exerting much effort. That is not the case now. With the development of rati, the mind and other senses, giving up the practice of fixing themselves on their material sense objects to which they had been long accustomed, became automatically fixed only on the Lord. Thus “I see” here means “directly experience.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.28

↗
ఇత్థం శరత్ప్రావృషికావృతూ హరే- ర్విశ‍ృణ్వతో మేఽనుసవం యశోఽమలమ్ । సఙ్కీర్త్యమానం మునిభిర్మహాత్మభి- ర్భక్తి: ప్రవృత్తాత్మరజస్తమోపహా ॥ ౨౮ ॥
itthaṁ śarat-prāvṛṣikāv ṛtū harer
[ittham sharat-praavrishikaav ritoo harer]
viśṛṇvato me ’nusavaṁ yaśo ’malam
[vishrinvato me ’nusavam yasho ’malam]
saṅkīrtyamānaṁ munibhir mahātmabhir
[sankeertyamaanam munibhir mahaatmabhir]
bhaktiḥ pravṛttātma-rajas-tamopahā
[bhaktih pravrittaatma-rajas-tamopahaa]
ittham — thus śarat — autumn prāvṛṣikau — rainy season ṛtū — two seasons hareḥ — of the Lord viśṛṇvataḥ — continuously hearing me — myself anusavam — constantly yaśaḥ amalam — unadulterated glories saṅkīrtyamānam — chanted by munibhiḥ — the great sages mahā-ātmabhiḥ — great souls bhaktiḥ — devotional service pravṛttā — began to flow ātma — living being rajaḥ — mode of passion tama — mode of ignorance upahā — vanishing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
itthaṁ śarat-prāvṛṣikāv ṛtū harer
ittham
thus
śarat
autumn
prāvṛṣikau
rainy season
ṛtū
two seasons
hareḥ
of the Lord
viśṛṇvato me ’nusavaṁ yaśo ’malam
viśṛṇvataḥ
continuously hearing
me
myself
saṅkīrtyamānaṁ munibhir mahātmabhir
anusavam
constantly
yaśaḥ amalam
unadulterated glories
saṅkīrtyamānam
chanted by
munibhiḥ
the great sages
mahā-ātmabhiḥ
great souls
bhaktiḥ
devotional service
bhaktiḥ pravṛttātma-rajas-tamopahā
pravṛttā
began to flow
ātma
living being
rajaḥ
mode of passion
tama
mode of ignorance
upahā
vanishing.
Thus during two seasons — the rainy season and autumn — I had the opportunity to hear these great-souled sages constantly chant the unadulterated glories of the Lord Hari. As the flow of my devotional service began, the coverings of the modes of passion and ignorance vanished.

Transcendental loving service for the Supreme Lord is the natural inclination of every living being. The instinct is dormant in everyone, but due to the association of material nature the modes of passion and ignorance cover this from time immemorial. If, by the grace of the Lord and the great-souled devotees of the Lord, a living being becomes fortunate enough to associate with the unadulterated devotees of the Lord and gets a chance to hear the unadulterated glories of the Lord, certainly the flow of devotional service takes place like the flow of a river. As the river flows on till she reaches the sea, similarly pure devotional service flows by the association of pure devotees till it reaches the ultimate goal, namely, transcendental love of God. Such a flow of devotional service cannot stop. On the contrary, it increases more and more without limitation. The flow of devotional service is so potent that any onlooker also becomes liberated from the influence of the modes of passion and ignorance. These two qualities of nature are thus removed, and the living being is liberated, being situated in his original position.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way, for the two seasons of monsoon and autumn, I constantly heard the pure glories of the Lord chanted by the generous sages. I then developed prema, which destroys rajas and tamas in the jīvas.
Commentary

Extending over two seasons (four months) I heard constantly (anusavam). Premā (bhaktiḥ) which destroys (apahā) rajas and tamas in all jīvas (ātma) then appeared. It is implied here that there was destruction of rajas and tamas in others as well who realized devotion to the Lord. This is the twelfth stage of bhakti. Direct vision of the Lord and the experience of sweetness will be explained in the next chapter.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.29

↗
తస్యైవం మేఽనురక్తస్య ప్రశ్రితస్య హతైనస: । శ్రద్దధానస్య బాలస్య దాన్తస్యానుచరస్య చ ॥ ౨౯ ॥
tasyaivaṁ me ’nuraktasya
[tasyaivam me ’nuraktasya]
praśritasya hatainasaḥ
[prashritasya hatainasah]
śraddadhānasya bālasya
[shraddadhaanasya baalasya]
dāntasyānucarasya ca
[daantasyaanucharasya cha]
tasya — his evam — thus me — mine anuraktasya — attached to them praśritasya — obediently hata — freed from enasaḥ — sins śraddadhānasya — of the faithful bālasya — of the boy dāntasya — subjugated anucarasya — strictly following the instructions ca — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyaivaṁ me ’nuraktasya
tasya
his
evam
thus
me
mine
praśritasya hatainasaḥ
śraddadhānasya bālasya
anuraktasya
attached to them
praśritasya
obediently
hata
freed from
enasaḥ
sins
śraddadhānasya
of the faithful
bālasya
of the boy
dāntasyānucarasya ca
dāntasya
subjugated
anucarasya
strictly following the instructions
ca
and.
I was very much attached to those sages. I was gentle in behavior, and all my sins were eradicated in their service. In my heart I had strong faith in them. I had subjugated the senses, and I was strictly following them with body and mind.

These are the necessary qualifications of a prospective candidate who can expect to be elevated to the position of a pure unadulterated devotee. Such a candidate must always seek the association of pure devotees. One should not be misled by a pseudodevotee. He himself must be plain and gentle to receive the instructions of such a pure devotee. A pure devotee is a completely surrendered soul unto the Personality of Godhead. He knows the Personality of Godhead as the supreme proprietor and all others as His servitors. And by the association of pure devotees only, one can get rid of all sins accumulated by mundane association. A neophyte devotee must faithfully serve the pure devotee, and he should be very much obedient and strictly follow the instructions. These are the signs of a devotee who is determined to achieve success even in the existing duration of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though I was a boy, I had developed prema for the Lord. I was humble, sinless, filled with faith, sense-controlled, and was willing to serve. The sages, most affectionate to the fallen, as they were about to depart, taught me the most confidential knowledge of pure bhakti, which was taught by the Lord himself.
Commentary

They gave knowledge to me who had developed prema-bhakti for the Lord (tasya evam anuraktasya). This knowledge was revealed directly by the Lord, son of Devakī (bhagavatoditam). Jṣāna-śāstra has a prevalence of monistic jṣāna. Confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyam) consists of a predominance of jṣana mixed with some bhakti. More confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyataram) is that which predominantly bhakti with a little mixture of jṣāna. Most confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyatamam) is pure bhakti, which was given to Uddhava and Brahmā in the Bhāgavatam and to Arjuna in the Gītā by the Lord. Contemplating that they would depart the next day (gamiṣyantaḥ), the sages taught (anvavocan) him the most confidential knowledge, pure bhakti.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.30

↗
జ్ఞానం గుహ్యతమం యత్తత్సాక్షాద్భ‍గవతోదితమ్ అన్వవోచన్ గమిష్యన్త: కృపయా దీనవత్సలా: ॥ ౩౦ ॥
jṣānaṁ guhyatamaṁ yat tat
[jshaanam guhyatamam yat tat]
sākṣād bhagavatoditam
[saakshaad bhagavatoditam]
anvavocan gamiṣyantaḥ
[anvavochan gamishyantah]
kṛpayā dīna-vatsalāḥ
[kripayaa deena-vatsalaah]
jṣānam — knowledge guhyatamam — most confidential yat — what is tat — that sākṣāt — directly bhagavatā uditam — propounded by the Lord Himself anvavocan — gave instruction gamiṣyantaḥ — while departing from kṛpayā — by causeless mercy dīna-vatsalāḥ — those who are very kind to the poor and meek.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jṣānaṁ guhyatamaṁ yat tat
jṣānam
knowledge
guhyatamam
most confidential
yat
what is
tat
that
sākṣād bhagavatoditam
sākṣāt
directly
bhagavatā uditam
propounded by the Lord Himself
anvavocan gamiṣyantaḥ
anvavocan
gave instruction
gamiṣyantaḥ
while departing from
kṛpayā dīna-vatsalāḥ
kṛpayā
by causeless mercy
dīna-vatsalāḥ
those who are very kind to the poor and meek.
As they were leaving, those bhakti-vedāntas, who are very kind to poor-hearted souls, instructed me in that most confidential subject which is instructed by the Personality of Godhead Himself.

A pure Vedāntist, or a bhakti-vedānta, instructs followers exactly according to the instructions of the Lord Himself. The Personality of Godhead, both in the Bhagavad-gītā and in all other scriptures, has definitely instructed men to follow the Lord only. The Lord is the creator, maintainer and annihilator of everything. The whole manifested creation is existing by His will, and by His will when the whole show is finished He will remain in His eternal abode with all His paraphernalia. Before the creation He was there in the eternal abode, and after the annihilation He will continue to remain. He is not, therefore, one of the created beings. He is transcendental. In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says that long, long before the instruction was imparted to Arjuna, the same was instructed to the sun-god, and in course of time, the same instruction, being wrongly handled and being broken, was again instructed to Arjuna because he was His perfect devotee and friend. Therefore, the instruction of the Lord can be understood by the devotees only and no one else. The impersonalist, who has no idea of the transcendental form of the Lord, cannot understand this most confidential message of the Lord. The expression “most confidential” is significant here because knowledge of devotional service is far, far above knowledge of impersonal Brahman. Jṣānam means ordinary knowledge or any branch of knowledge. This knowledge develops up to the knowledge of impersonal Brahman. Above this, when it is partially mixed with devotion, such knowledge develops to knowledge of Paramātmā, or the all-pervading Godhead. This is more confidential. But when such knowledge is turned into pure devotional service and the confidential part of transcendental knowledge is attained, it is called the most confidential knowledge. This most confidential knowledge was imparted by the Lord to Brahmā, Arjuna, Uddhava, etc.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though I was a boy, I had developed prema for the Lord. I was humble, sinless, filled with faith, sense-controlled, and was willing to serve. The sages, most affectionate to the fallen, as they were about to depart, taught me the most confidential knowledge of pure bhakti, which was taught by the Lord himself.
Commentary

They gave knowledge to me who had developed prema-bhakti for the Lord (tasya evam anuraktasya). This knowledge was revealed directly by the Lord, son of Devakī (bhagavatoditam). Jṣāna-śāstra has a prevalence of monistic jṣāna. Confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyam) consists of a predominance of jṣana mixed with some bhakti. More confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyataram) is that which predominantly bhakti with a little mixture of jṣāna. Most confidential scripture (śāstra-guhyatamam) is pure bhakti, which was given to Uddhava and Brahmā in the Bhāgavatam and to Arjuna in the Gītā by the Lord. Contemplating that they would depart the next day (gamiṣyantaḥ), the sages taught (anvavocan) him the most confidential knowledge, pure bhakti.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.31

↗
యేనైవాహం భగవతో వాసుదేవస్య వేధస: మాయానుభావమవిదం యేన గచ్ఛన్తి తత్పదమ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
yenaivāhaṁ bhagavato
[yenaivaaham bhagavato]
vāsudevasya vedhasaḥ
[vaasudevasya vedhasah]
māyānubhāvam avidaṁ
[maayaanubhaavam avidam]
yena gacchanti tat-padam
[yena gachchanti tat-padam]
yena — by which eva — certainly aham — I bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead vāsudevasya — of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa vedhasaḥ — of the supreme creator māyā — energy anubhāvam — influence avidam — easily understood yena — by which gacchanti — they go tat-padam — at the lotus feet of the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yenaivāhaṁ bhagavato
yena
by which
vāsudevasya vedhasaḥ
eva
certainly
aham
I
māyānubhāvam avidaṁ
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
vāsudevasya
of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
vedhasaḥ
of the supreme creator
māyā
energy
yena gacchanti tat-padam
anubhāvam
influence
avidam
easily understood
yena
by which
gacchanti
they go
tat-padam
at the lotus feet of the Lord.
By that confidential knowledge, I could understand clearly the influence of the energy of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the creator, maintainer and annihilator of everything. By knowing that, one can return to Him and personally meet Him.

By devotional service or by the most confidential knowledge, one can understand very easily how the different energies of the Lord are working. One part of His energy is manifesting the material world; the other (superior) part of His energy is manifesting the spiritual world. And His intermediate energy is manifesting the living entities who are serving either of the above-mentioned energies. The living entities serving material energy are struggling hard for existence, and happiness, which is presented to them as illusion. But those in the spiritual energy are placed under the direct service of the Lord in eternal life, complete knowledge and perpetual bliss. The Lord desires, as He has directly said in the Bhagavad-gītā, that all conditioned souls, rotting in the kingdom of material energy, come back to Him by giving up all engagements in the material world. This is the most confidential part of knowledge. But this can be understood only by the pure devotees, and only such devotees enter the kingdom of God to see Him personally and serve Him personally. The concrete example is Nārada himself, who attained this stage of eternal knowledge and eternal bliss. And the ways and means are open to all, provided one agrees to follow in the footsteps of Śrī Nārada Muni. According to śruti, the Supreme Lord has unlimited energies (without effort by Him), and these are described under three principal headings, as above mentioned.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By this knowledge I understood the influence of the spiritual and material energies of the creator Lord Vāsudeva. By this understanding the devotees attain the Lord’s abode.
Commentary

By this knowledge of Bhāgavatam, I understood the influence or effect of the Lord’s cit-śakti, the kṛpa-śakti, the acit-śakti of three guṇas, and the influence of the knowledge of the Lord’s powers and sweetness (māyānubhāvam).

triguṇātmikātha jṣānaṁ ca viṣṇu-śaktis tathaiva ca | māyā-śabdena bhaṇyate śabda-tattvārtha-vedibhir ||

Those who know the true meaning of words say that māyā means what is made of the three guṇas of matter, knowledge and the śakti of Viṣṇu. Śabda-mahodadhi

Nirghaṇṭu says māyā ca vayunaṁ jṣānam: māyā means knowledge. Trikāṇḍa-śeṣa of the Amara-koṣa says māyā syāc chambarī-buddhyor: māyā means a maidservant of Ṣambara and intelligence. Viśva-kośa says māyā dambhe kṛpāyāṁ ca: māyā means deceit and mercy. The Lord is endowed with his eternal śakti arising from his svarūpa, which is called māyā. In a commentary, Madhva quotes the following śruti text:

svarūpa-bhūtayā nitya-śaktyā māyākhyayā yutaḥ ato māyā-mayaṁ viṣṇuṁ pravadanti sanātanam

They call the eternal Viṣṇu māyā-mayam, because he is endowed with his eternal śakti arising from his svarūpa, which is called māyā.

Later in the Bhāgavatam the word māyā may mean cit-śakti, acit-śakti, knowledge or mercy according to the context.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.32

↗
ఏతత్సంసూచితం బ్రహ్మంస్తాపత్రయచికిత్సితమ్ । యదీశ్వరే భగవతి కర్మ బ్రహ్మణి భావితమ్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
etat saṁsūcitaṁ brahmaṁs
[etat samsoochitam brahmams]
tāpa-traya-cikitsitam
[taapa-traya-chikitsitam]
yad īśvare bhagavati
[yad eeshvare bhagavati]
karma brahmaṇi bhāvitam
[karma brahmani bhaavitam]
etat — this much saṁsūcitam — decided by the learned brahman — O brāhmaṇa Vyāsa tāpa-traya — three kinds of miseries cikitsitam — remedial measures yat — what īśvare — the supreme controller bhagavati — unto the Personality of Godhead karma — one’s prescribed activities brahmaṇi — unto the great bhāvitam — dedicated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etat saṁsūcitaṁ brahmaṁs
etat
this much
saṁsūcitam
decided by the learned
brahman
O brāhmaṇa Vyāsa
tāpa-traya-cikitsitam
tāpa-traya
three kinds of miseries
cikitsitam
remedial measures
yad īśvare bhagavati
yat
what
īśvare
the supreme controller
bhagavati
unto the Personality of Godhead
karma brahmaṇi bhāvitam
karma
one’s prescribed activities
brahmaṇi
unto the great
bhāvitam
dedicated.
O Brāhmaṇa Vyāsadeva, it is decided by the learned that the best remedial measure for removing all troubles and miseries is to dedicate one’s activities to the service of the Supreme Lord Personality of Godhead [Śrī Kṛṣṇa].

Śrī Nārada Muni personally experienced that the most feasible and practical way to open the path of salvation or get relief from all miseries of life is to hear submissively the transcendental activities of the Lord from the right and bona fide sources. This is the only remedial process. The entire material existence is full of miseries. Foolish people have manufactured, out of their tiny brains, many remedial measures for removing the threefold miseries pertaining to the body and mind, pertaining to the natural disturbances and in relation with other living beings. The whole world is struggling very hard to exist out of these miseries, but men do not know that without the sanction of the Lord no plan or no remedial measure can actually bring about the desired peace and tranquillity. The remedial measure to cure a patient by medical treatment is useless if it is not sanctioned by the Lord. To cross the river or the ocean by a suitable boat is no remedial measure if it is not sanctioned by the Lord. We should know for certain that the Lord is the ultimate sanctioning officer, and we must therefore dedicate our attempts to the mercy of the Lord for ultimate success or to get rid of the obstacles on the path of success. The Lord is all-pervading, all-powerful, omniscient and omnipresent. He is the ultimate sanctioning agent of all good or bad effects. We should, therefore, learn to dedicate our activities unto the mercy of the Lord and accept Him either as impersonal Brahman, localized Paramātmā or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It does not matter what one is. One must dedicate everything in the service of the Lord. If one is a learned scholar, scientist, philosopher, poet, etc., then he should employ his learning to establish the supremacy of the Lord. Try to study the energy of the Lord in every sphere of life. Do not decry Him and try to become like Him or take His position simply by fragmental accumulation of knowledge. If one is an administrator, statesman, warrior, politician, etc., then one should try to establish the Lord’s supremacy in statesmanship. Fight for the cause of the Lord as Śrī Arjuna did. In the beginning, Śrī Arjuna, the great fighter, declined to fight, but when he was convinced by the Lord that the fighting was necessary, Śrī Arjuna changed his decision and fought for His cause. Similarly, if one is a businessman, an industrialist, an agriculturist, etc., then one should spend his hard-earned money for the cause of the Lord. Think always that the money which is accumulated is the wealth of the Lord. Wealth is considered to be the goddess of fortune (Lakṣmī), and the Lord is Nārāyaṇa, or the husband of Lakṣmī. Try to engage Lakṣmī in the service of Lord Nārāyaṇa and be happy. That is the way to realize the Lord in every sphere of life. The best thing is, after all, to get relief from all material activities and engage oneself completely in hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. But in case of the absence of such an opportunity, one should try to engage in the service of the Lord everything for which one has specific attraction, and that is the way of peace and prosperity. The word saṁsūcitam in this stanza is also significant. One should not think for a moment that the realization of Nārada was a childish imagination only. It is not like that. It is so realized by the expert and erudite scholars, and that is the real import of the word saṁsūcitam.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhman! They indirectly explained the destruction of the three types of miseries, in which actions are offered to Paramātmā, Bhagavān and the impersonal brahman.
Commentary

Having had me practice bhakti beyond the modes of nature, and experience prema, and taught the Bhāgavatam which was spoken by the Lord, who is the direct speaker of bhakti, they taught me the process of jṣāna which gives rise to knowledge and the goal of liberation, even though I did not request it. Considering that the question of jṣāna may arise when the boy grows older, they then taught me jṣana indirectly for the purpose of developing indifference to the world. That is explained in this verse.

Since it was not my goal they spoke indirectly about it (saṁsūcitam). What did they speak about? They explained the remedy for, or destruction of, the three miseries in which actions are offered (bhāvitam) to the Paramātmā (īśvare), to Bhagavān with six opulences or to the impersonal brahman.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.33

↗
ఆమయో యశ్చ భూతానాం జాయతే యేన సువ్రత । తదేవ హ్యామయం ద్రవ్యం న పునాతి చికిత్సితమ్ ॥ ౩౩ ॥
āmayo yaś ca bhūtānāṁ
[aamayo yash cha bhootaanaam]
jāyate yena suvrata
[jaayate yena suvrata]
tad eva hy āmayaṁ dravyaṁ
[tad eva hy aamayam dravyam]
na punāti cikitsitam
[na punaati chikitsitam]
āmayaḥ — diseases yaḥ ca — whatever bhūtānām — of the living being jāyate — become possible yena — by the agency suvrata — O good soul tat — that eva — very hi — certainly āmayam — disease dravyam — thing na — does it not punāti — cure cikitsitam — treated with.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āmayo yaś ca bhūtānāṁ
āmayaḥ
diseases
yaḥ ca
whatever
bhūtānām
of the living being
jāyate yena suvrata
jāyate
become possible
yena
by the agency
suvrata
O good soul
tad eva hy āmayaṁ dravyaṁ
tat
that
eva
very
hi
certainly
āmayam
disease
dravyam
thing
na punāti cikitsitam
na
does it not
punāti
cure
cikitsitam
treated with.
O good soul, does not a thing, applied therapeutically, cure a disease which was caused by that very same thing?

An expert physician treats his patient with a therapeutic diet. For example, milk preparations sometimes cause disorder of the bowels, but the very same milk converted into curd and mixed with some other remedial ingredients cures such disorders. Similarly, the threefold miseries of material existence cannot be mitigated simply by material activities. Such activities have to be spiritualized, just as by fire iron is made red-hot, and thereby the action of fire begins. Similarly, the material conception of a thing is at once changed as soon as it is put into the service of the Lord. That is the secret of spiritual success. We should not try to lord it over the material nature, nor should we reject material things. The best way to make the best use of a bad bargain is to use everything in relation with the supreme spiritual being. Everything is an emanation from the Supreme Spirit, and by His inconceivable power He can convert spirit into matter and matter into spirit. Therefore a material thing (so-called) is at once turned into a spiritual force by the great will of the Lord. The necessary condition for such a change is to employ so-called matter in the service of the spirit. That is the way to treat our material diseases and elevate ourselves to the spiritual plane where there is no misery, no lamentation and no fear. When everything is thus employed in the service of the Lord, we can experience that there is nothing except the Supreme Brahman. The Vedic mantra that “everything is Brahman” is thus realized by us.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The substance by which a living being’s disease arises and which does not cure the disease, when combined with other substances in a medicine, destroys the disease.
Commentary

“How can karma, the cause of saṁsāra, destroy the three miseries?” In two verses, examples are given to show that by different combinations, the destruction can occur. That ghee or some other substance which causes disease (āmayaḥ) when infused (cikitsitam) with medicines (dravyam) does not protect the disease (na punāti), but destroys the disease. The word na punāti (it does not purify) here means “it does not protect.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.34

↗
ఏవం నృణాం క్రియాయోగా: సర్వే సంసృతిహేతవ: । త ఏవాత్మవినాశాయ కల్పన్తే కల్పితా: పరే ॥ ౩౪ ॥
evaṁ nṛṇāṁ kriyā-yogāḥ
[evam nrinaam kriyaa-yogaah]
sarve saṁsṛti-hetavaḥ
[sarve samsriti-hetavah]
ta evātma-vināśāya
[ta evaatma-vinaashaaya]
kalpante kalpitāḥ pare
[kalpante kalpitaah pare]
evam — thus nṛṇām — of the human being kriyā-yogāḥ — all activities sarve — everything saṁsṛti — material existence hetavaḥ — causes te — that eva — certainly ātma — the tree of work vināśāya — killing kalpante — become competent kalpitāḥ — dedicated pare — unto the Transcendence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ nṛṇāṁ kriyā-yogāḥ
evam
thus
nṛṇām
of the human being
kriyā-yogāḥ
all activities
sarve saṁsṛti-hetavaḥ
sarve
everything
saṁsṛti
material existence
hetavaḥ
causes
ta evātma-vināśāya
kalpante kalpitāḥ pare
te
that
eva
certainly
ātma
the tree of work
vināśāya
killing
kalpante
become competent
kalpitāḥ
dedicated
pare
unto the Transcendence.
Thus when all a man’s activities are dedicated to the service of the Lord, those very activities which caused his perpetual bondage become the destroyer of the tree of work.

Fruitive work which has perpetually engaged the living being is compared to the banyan tree in the Bhagavad-gītā, for it is certainly very deeply rooted. As long as the propensity for enjoying the fruit of work is there, one has to continue the transmigration of the soul from one body or place to another, according to one’s nature of work. The propensity for enjoyment may be turned into the desire for serving the mission of the Lord. By doing so, one’s activity is changed into karma-yoga, or the way by which one can attain spiritual perfection while engaging in the work for which he has a natural tendency. Here the word ātmā indicates the categories of all fruitive work. The conclusion is that when the result of all fruitive and other work is dovetailed with the service of the Lord, it will cease to generate further karma and will gradually develop into transcendental devotional service, which will not only cut off completely the root of the banyan tree of work but will also carry the performer to the lotus feet of the Lord.

The summary is that one has to, first of all, seek the association of pure devotees who not only are learned in the Vedānta but are self-realized souls and unalloyed devotees of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead. In that association, the neophyte devotees must render loving service physically and mentally without reservation. This service attitude will induce the great souls to be more favorable in bestowing their mercy, which injects the neophyte with all the transcendental qualities of the pure devotees. Gradually this is developed into a strong attachment to hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Lord, which makes him able to catch up the constitutional position of the gross and subtle bodies and beyond them the knowledge of the pure soul and his eternal relation with the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead. After the relation is ascertained by establishment of the eternal relation, pure devotional service to the Lord begins gradually developing into perfect knowledge of the Personality of Godhead beyond the purview of impersonal Brahman and localized Paramātmā. By such puruṣottama-yoga, as it is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, one is made perfect even during the present corporeal existence, and one exhibits all the good qualities of the Lord to the highest percentage. Such is the gradual development by association of pure devotees.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the same way, all types of karma-yoga performed by men, which are normally causes of continued rebirth in this world, are able to destroy karma when offered to the Supreme Lord.
Commentary

All the actions in karma-yoga (kriyā-yogāḥ) - daily duties, duties to fulfill specific desires, periodic duties, and desireless duties - when offered to the Supreme Lord become capable of destroying karma (ātma-vināśāya).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.35

↗
యదత్ర క్రియతే కర్మ భగవత్పరితోషణమ్ । జ్ఞానం యత్తదధీనం హి భక్తియోగసమన్వితమ్ ॥ ౩౫ ॥
yad atra kriyate karma
[yad atra kriyate karma]
bhagavat-paritoṣaṇam
[bhagavat-paritoshanam]
jṣānaṁ yat tad adhīnaṁ hi
[jshaanam yat tad adheenam hi]
bhakti-yoga-samanvitam
[bhakti-yoga-samanvitam]
yat — whatever atra — in this life or world kriyate — does perform karma — work bhagavat — unto the Personality of Godhead paritoṣaṇam — satisfaction of jṣānam — knowledge yat tat — what is so called adhīnam — dependent hi — certainly bhakti-yoga — devotional samanvitam — dovetailed with bhakti-yoga..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad atra kriyate karma
yat
whatever
atra
in this life or world
kriyate
does perform
karma
work
bhagavat-paritoṣaṇam
bhagavat
unto the Personality of Godhead
paritoṣaṇam
satisfaction of
jṣānaṁ yat tad adhīnaṁ hi
jṣānam
knowledge
yat tat
what is so called
adhīnam
dependent
hi
certainly
bhakti-yoga-samanvitam
bhakti-yoga
devotional
samanvitam
dovetailed with bhakti-yoga..
Whatever work is done here in this life for the satisfaction of the mission of the Lord is called bhakti-yoga, or transcendental loving service to the Lord, and what is called knowledge becomes a concomitant factor.

The general and popular notion is that by discharging fruitive work in terms of the direction of the scriptures one becomes perfectly able to acquire transcendental knowledge for spiritual realization. Bhakti-yoga is considered by some to be another form of karma. But factually bhakti-yoga is above both karma and jṣāna. Bhakti-yoga is independent of jṣāna or karma; on the other hand, jṣāna and karma are dependent on bhakti-yoga. This kriyā-yoga or karma-yoga, as recommended by Śrī Nārada to Vyāsa, is specifically recommended because the principle is to satisfy the Lord. The Lord does not want His sons, the living beings, to suffer the threefold miseries of life. He desires that all of them come to Him and live with Him, but going back to Godhead means that one must purify himself from material infections. When work is performed, therefore, to satisfy the Lord, the performer becomes gradually purified from the material affection. This purification means attainment of spiritual knowledge. Therefore knowledge is dependent on karma, or work, done on behalf of the Lord. Other knowledge, being devoid of bhakti-yoga or satisfaction of the Lord, cannot lead one back to the kingdom of God, which means that it cannot even offer salvation, as already explained in connection with the stanza naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitam . The conclusion is that a devotee engaged in the unalloyed service of the Lord, specifically in hearing and chanting of His transcendental glories, becomes simultaneously spiritually enlightened by the divine grace, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That jṣāna which arises from karma, which is pleasing to the Lord because of being offered to him, is endowed with bhakti.
Commentary

That karma which is offered to the Lord is a sādhana of jṣāna, because it causes purification to the level of sattva-guṇa. That knowledge generated from (tad-adhīnam) karma which is without desire and which is pleasing to the Lord because of being offering to the Lord, is endowed with bhakti, since jṣāna devoid of bhakti will not yield liberation. Such jṣāna is condemned in many places:

naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ na śobhate jṣānam alaṁ niraṣjanam

Knowledge of self-realization, even though free from all material affinity, does not look well if devoid of a conception of the Infallible [God]. SB 1.5.12

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.36

↗
కుర్వాణా యత్ర కర్మాణి భగవచ్ఛిక్షయాసకృత్ । గృణన్తి గుణనామాని కృష్ణస్యానుస్మరన్తి చ ॥ ౩౬ ॥
kurvāṇā yatra karmāṇi
[kurvaanaa yatra karmaani]
bhagavac-chikṣayāsakṛt
[bhagavach-chikshayaasakrit]
gṛṇanti guṇa-nāmāni
[grinanti guna-naamaani]
kṛṣṇasyānusmaranti ca
[krishnasyaanusmaranti cha]
kurvāṇāḥ — while performing yatra — thereupon karmāṇi — duties bhagavat — the Personality of Godhead śikṣayā — by the will of asakṛt — constantly gṛṇanti — takes on guṇa — qualities nāmāni — names kṛṣṇasya — of Kṛṣṇa anusmaranti — constantly remembers ca — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kurvāṇā yatra karmāṇi
kurvāṇāḥ
while performing
yatra
thereupon
karmāṇi
duties
bhagavac-chikṣayāsakṛt
bhagavat
the Personality of Godhead
śikṣayā
by the will of
asakṛt
constantly
gṛṇanti guṇa-nāmāni
gṛṇanti
takes on
guṇa
qualities
nāmāni
names
kṛṣṇasyānusmaranti ca
kṛṣṇasya
of Kṛṣṇa
anusmaranti
constantly remembers
ca
and.
While performing duties according to the order of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one constantly remembers Him, His names and His qualities.

An expert devotee of the Lord can mold his life in such a way that while performing all kinds of duties either for this or the next life, he can constantly remember the Lord’s name, fame, qualities, etc. The order of the Lord is distinctly there in the Bhagavad-gītā: one should work only for the Lord in all spheres of life. In every sphere of life the Lord should be situated as the proprietor. According to the Vedic rites, even in the worship of some demigods like Indra, Brahmā, Sarasvatī and Gaṇeśa, the system is that in all circumstances the representation of Viṣṇu must be there as yajṣeśvara, or the controlling power of such sacrifices. It is recommended that a particular demigod be worshiped for a particular purpose, but still the presence of Viṣṇu is compulsory in order to make the function proper.

Apart from such Vedic duties, even in our ordinary dealings (for example, in our household affairs or in our business or profession) we must consider that the result of all activities must be given over to the supreme enjoyer, Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord has declared Himself to be the supreme enjoyer of everything, the supreme proprietor of every planet and the supreme friend of all beings. No one else but Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa can claim to be the proprietor of everything within His creation. A pure devotee remembers this constantly, and in doing so he repeats the transcendental name, fame and qualities of the Lord, which means that he is constantly in touch with the Lord. The Lord is identical with His name, fame, etc., and therefore to be associated with His name, fame, etc., constantly, means actually to associate with the Lord.

The major portion of our monetary income, not less than fifty percent, must be spent to carry out the order of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Not only should we give the profit of our earning to this cause, but we must also arrange to preach this cult of devotion to others because that is also one of the orders of the Lord. The Lord definitely says that no one is more dear to Him than one who is always engaged in the preaching work of the Lord’s name and fame all over the world. The scientific discoveries of the material world can also be equally engaged in carrying out His order. He wants the message of the Bhagavad-gītā to be preached amongst His devotees. It may not be so done amongst those who have no credit of austerities, charity, education, etc. Therefore, the attempt must go on to convert unwilling men to become His devotees. Lord Caitanya has taught a very simple method in this connection. He has taught the lesson for preaching the transcendental message through singing, dancing and refreshment. As such, fifty percent of our income may be spent for this purpose. In this fallen age of quarrel and dissension, if only the leading and wealthy persons of society agree to spend fifty percent of their income in the service of the Lord, as it is taught by Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there is absolute certainty of converting this hell of pandemonium to the transcendental abode of the Lord. No one will disagree to partake in a function where good singing, dancing and refreshment are administered. Everyone will attend such a function, and everyone is sure to feel individually the transcendental presence of the Lord. This alone will help the attendants associate with the Lord and thereby purify themselves in spiritual realization. The only condition for successfully executing such spiritual activities is that they must be conducted under the guidance of a pure devotee who is completely free from all mundane desires, fruitive activities and dry speculations about the nature of the Lord. No one has to discover the nature of the Lord. It is already spoken by the Lord Himself in the Bhagavad-gītā especially and in all other Vedic literatures generally. We have simply to accept them in toto and abide by the orders of the Lord. That will guide us to the path of perfection. One can remain in his own position. No one has to change his position, especially in this age of variegated difficulties. The only condition is that one must give up the habit of dry speculation aimed at becoming one with the Lord. And after giving up such lofty puffed-up vanities, one may very submissively receive the orders of the Lord in the Bhagavad-gītā or Bhāgavatam from the lips of a bona fide devotee whose qualification is mentioned above. That will make everything successful, without a doubt.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When those engaged in karma continuously perform those activities according to the instruction of the Lord, they also chant and remember the qualities and names of Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

It has just been said that by karma-yoga mixed with bhakti (bhakti-miśra-karma) one achieves jṣāna mixed with bhakti, which aims at liberation. Now it is said that sometimes, some people, who practice niṣkāma-karma mixed with bhakti, can develop bhakti mixed with karma (karma-miśra-bhakti) by association with devotees having karma-miśra-bhakti.

When persons in karma-yoga perform actions according to the lord’s instructions, by unexpected association of devotees, some perform bhakti consisting of chanting and remembering. The instruction of the Lord is:

yat karoṣi yad aśnāsi yaj juhoṣi dadāsi yat | yat tapasyasi kaunteya tat kuruṣva mad-arpaṇam ||

Whatever you do, whatever you eat, whatever you sacrifice, whatever you give, whatever austerity you perform, offer it to Me, O son of Kuntī. BG 9.27

It is not befitting to explain this teaching of the Lord to be directed to the karma-yogī since this verse falls in the section on bhakti. The karma-yogī offers only Vedic karmas to the Lord in order that the results will come to him. The devotees however, understanding that their very selves belong only to the Lord, take Vedic, mundane, and daily duties, which are impelled by the Lord, and offer them all completely to the Lord. There is a great difference between these two persons. This is how the Gītā verse is explained by Śrī Rāmānujācārya. This is indicated by including the phrase “whatever you eat.” Because of the use of the present tense in the verb kurvāṇāḥ (while doing karmas according to the Lord’s instructions) and because the main verb (chanting and remembering) indicates that they simultaneously perform bhakti, the whole sentence refers to bhakti as the principle action mixed with karma. By karma-miśra-bhakti one achieves jṣāna-miśra-bhakti. From that one achieves rati for the Lord along with liberation. This is called śānta-bhakti. This is understood from the following verse:

ātmārāmāś ca munayo nirgranthā apy urukrame kurvanty ahaitukīṁ bhaktim ittham-bhūta-guṇo hariḥ

Some sages who are ātmārāmas, beyond the scriptures, false ego and rules, also practice unmotivated, pure bhakti to the master of pure bhakti, Kṛṣṇa, since he possesses qualities attractive to even them. SB 1.7.10

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.37

↗
ఓం నమో భగవతే తుభ్యం వాసుదేవాయ ధీమహి । ప్రద్యుమ్నాయానిరుద్ధాయ నమ: సఙ్కర్షణాయ చ ॥ ౩౭ ॥
oṁ namo bhagavate tubhyaṁ
[om namo bhagavate tubhyam]
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
[vaasudevaaya dheemahi]
pradyumnāyāniruddhāya
[pradyumnaayaaniruddhaaya]
namaḥ saṅkarṣaṇāya ca
[namah sankarshanaaya cha]
oṁ — the sign of chanting the transcendental glory of the Lord namaḥ — offering obeisances unto the Lord bhagavate — unto the Personality of Godhead tubhyam — unto You vāsudevāya — unto the Lord, the son of Vasudeva dhīmahi — let us chant pradyumnāya, aniruddhāya and saṅkarṣaṇāya — all plenary expansions of Vāsudeva namaḥ — respectful obeisances ca — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
oṁ namo bhagavate tubhyaṁ
oṁ
the sign of chanting the transcendental glory of the Lord
namaḥ
offering obeisances unto the Lord
bhagavate
unto the Personality of Godhead
tubhyam
unto You
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
vāsudevāya
unto the Lord, the son of Vasudeva
dhīmahi
let us chant
pradyumnāyāniruddhāya
pradyumnāya, aniruddhāya and saṅkarṣaṇāya
all plenary expansions of Vāsudeva
namaḥ saṅkarṣaṇāya ca
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
ca
and.
Let us all chant the glories of Vāsudeva along with His plenary expansions Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Saṅkarṣaṇa.

According to Paṣcarātra, Nārāyaṇa is the primeval cause of all expansions of Godhead. These are Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. Vāsudeva and Saṅkarṣaṇa are on the middle left and right, Pradyumna is on the right of Saṅkarṣaṇa, and Aniruddha is on the left of Vāsudeva, and thus the four Deities are situated. They are known as the four aides-de-camp of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

This is a Vedic hymn or mantra beginning with oṁkāra praṇava, and thus the mantra is established by the transcendental chanting process, namely, oṁ namo dhīmahi, etc.

The purport is that any transaction, either in the field of fruitive work or in empiric philosophy, which is not ultimately aimed at transcendental realization of the Supreme Lord, is considered to be useless. Nāradajī has therefore explained the nature of unalloyed devotional service by his personal experience in the development of intimacy between the Lord and the living entity by a gradual process of progressive devotional activities. Such a progressive march of transcendental devotion for the Lord culminates in the attainment of loving service of the Lord, which is called premā in different transcendental variegatedness called rasas (tastes). Such devotional service is also executed in mixed forms, namely mixed with fruitive work or empiric philosophical speculations.

Now the question which was raised by the great ṛṣis headed by Śaunaka regarding the confidential part of Sūta’s achievement through the spiritual master is explained herein by the chanting of this hymn consisting of thirty-three letters. And this mantra is addressed to the four Deities, or the Lord with His plenary expansions. The central figure is Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa because the plenary portions are His aides-de-camp. The most confidential part of the instruction is that one should always chant and remember the glories of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, along with His different plenary portions expanded as Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. These expansions are the original Deities for all other truths, namely either viṣṇu-tattva or śakti-tattvas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to you, Bhagavān Kṛsṇa. Let us respect Vāsudeva, Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Saṇkarṣaṇa (Balarāma) in our minds.
Commentary

It has been explained that both jṣāna and karma without bhakti are condemned completely (SB 1.5.12). It has also been said in three verses (SB 1.5.17-19) that pure bhakti beyond the guṇas is the supreme process. The whole process from the first appearance of pure bhakti to its increase up to prema has also been described in six verses (SB 1.5.23-28). Then according to qualification, bhakti-miśra-jṣāna was permitted (SB 1.5.35), and karma-miśra-bhakti was mentioned as superior to that (SB 1.5.36). Now in two verses, desiring to teach his personal mantra received from the gurus, Nārada first creates faith in those mantras. This is according to the statement brūyuḥ snigdhasya śiṣyasya guravo guhyam apy uta: the gurus should speak the secret to the disciple who has affection for the gurus. (SB 1.1.8)

This mantra has thirty-three syllables. Its devatā is bhagavān, who consists of four forms. By placing the members out of order, one can understand that this is a listing of the members of Kṛṣna’s caturvyūha rather than the one in Vaikuṇṭha (Kṛsṇa, Balarāma and Kṛsṇa’s son and grandson), with his son Pradyumna and his grandson Aniruddha placed next to Vāsudeva (Krṣna) Or this the order of persons mentioned in the mantra can be taken as a statement of creation (Pradyumna), maintenance (Aniruddha) and destruction (Saṅkarṣaṇa). Let us meditate upon offering respects (namo dhīmahi). This means let us offer respects in the mind.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.38

↗
ఇతి మూర్త్యభిధానేన మన్త్రమూర్తిమమూర్తికమ్ । యజతే యజ్ఞపురుషం స సమ్యగ్దర్శన: పుమాన్ ॥ ౩౮ ॥
iti mūrty-abhidhānena
[iti moorty-abhidhaanena]
mantra-mūrtim amūrtikam
[mantra-moortim amoortikam]
yajate yajṣa-puruṣaṁ
[yajate yajsha-purusham]
sa samyag-darśanaḥ pumān
[sa samyag-darshanah pumaan]
iti — thus mūrti — representation abhidhānena — in sound mantra-mūrtim — form representation of transcendental sound amūrtikam — the Lord, who has no material form yajate — worship yajṣa — Viṣṇu puruṣam — the Personality of Godhead saḥ — he alone samyak — perfectly darśanaḥ — one who has seen pumān — person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti mūrty-abhidhānena
iti
thus
mūrti
representation
abhidhānena
in sound
mantra-mūrtim amūrtikam
mantra-mūrtim
form representation of transcendental sound
amūrtikam
the Lord, who has no material form
yajate yajṣa-puruṣaṁ
yajate
worship
yajṣa
Viṣṇu
puruṣam
the Personality of Godhead
sa samyag-darśanaḥ pumān
saḥ
he alone
samyak
perfectly
darśanaḥ
one who has seen
pumān
person.
Thus he is the actual seer who worships, in the form of transcendental sound representation, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, who has no material form.

Our present senses are all made of material elements, and therefore they are imperfect in realizing the transcendental form of Lord Viṣṇu. He is therefore worshiped by sound representation via the transcendental method of chanting. Anything which is beyond the scope of experience by our imperfect senses can be realized fully by the sound representation. A person transmitting sound from a far distant place can be factually experienced. If this is materially possible, why not spiritually? This experience is not a vague impersonal experience. It is actually an experience of the transcendental Personality of Godhead, who possesses the pure form of eternity, bliss and knowledge.

In the Amarakośa Sanskrit dictionary the word mūrti carries import in twofold meanings, namely, form and difficulty. Therefore amūrtikam is explained by Ācārya Śrī Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura as meaning “without difficulty.” The transcendental form of eternal bliss and knowledge can be experienced by our original spiritual senses, which can be revived by chanting of the holy mantras, or transcendental sound representations. Such sound should be received from the transparent agency of the bona fide spiritual master, and the chanting may be practiced by the direction of the spiritual master. That will gradually lead us nearer to the Lord. This method of worship is recommended in the pāṣcarātrika system, which is both recognized and authorized. The pāṣcarātrika system has the most authorized codes for transcendental devotional service. Without the help of such codes, one cannot approach the Lord, certainly not by dry philosophical speculation. The pāṣcarātrika system is both practical and suitable for this age of quarrel. The Paṣcarātra is more important than the Vedānta for this modern age.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Using this mantra indicating the four forms, one worships the deity who is the subject of the dhyāna-mantra, the Lord worthy of worship. That person is worthy of being seen.
Commentary

One worships using the four names indicating the four forms starting with Vāsudeva. One should worship the Lord, who is the subject of the dhyāna-mantra (mantra-mūrtim), with the sixteen items of worship while uttering vāsudevāya namaḥ etc. according to the rules of Paṣcarātra. By chanting the mantra, the deity makes his appearance. Or mantra-mūrti can mean the deity whose body is the mantra. That Lord does not have a material form (amūrtikam). Amūrtikam can also mean that the Lord who is not hard, but rather soft with mercy. Amara-kosa says mūrtiḥ kāṭhinya-kāyayor: mūrti means hard and body. Yajṣa-puruṣam means “the Lord who should be worshipped.” He is pleasant to behold (samyag-darśanaḥ). This means that when others see that worshipper, they become successful. Or darśanaḥ can mean knowledge. One who worships the lord has complete knowledge. Or darśanaḥ can mean “by which something is seen.” That means scripture which denotes bhakti, such as the Paṣcarātra, which is most wholesome (samyak), because it is satisfying to the soul. One who worships the Lord possesses the complete scriptural conclusion. This does not refer to scriptures devoid of bhakti, which are not wholesome but deficient.

bhavatānudita-prāyaṁ yaśo bhagavato ’malam | yenaivāsau na tuṣyeta manye tad darśanaṁ khilam ||

You have not sufficiently described the glories of the spotless Lord Kṛṣṇa. Because your mind could never be satisfied with Vedānta, I think that writing the Vedānta-sūtras is insufficient. SB 1.5.8

This means “Though you wrote the Vedānta-darśana, your mind is not satisfied completely, but I became fully satisfied in mind by writing the Paṣcarātra.”

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.39

↗
ఇమం స్వనిగమం బ్రహ్మన్నవేత్య మదనుష్ఠితమ్ । అదాన్మే జ్ఞానమైశ్వర్యం స్వస్మిన్ భావం చ కేశవ: ॥ ౩౯ ॥
imaṁ sva-nigamaṁ brahmann
[imam sva-nigamam brahmann]
avetya mad-anuṣṭhitam
[avetya mad-anushthitam]
adān me jṣānam aiśvaryaṁ
[adaan me jshaanam aishvaryam]
svasmin bhāvaṁ ca keśavaḥ
[svasmin bhaavam cha keshavah]
imam — thus sva-nigamam — confidential knowledge of the Vedas in respect to the Supreme Personality of Godhead brahman — O brāhmaṇa (Vyāsadeva) avetya — knowing it well mat — by me anuṣṭhitam — executed adāt — bestowed upon me me — me jṣānam — transcendental knowledge aiśvaryam — opulence svasmin — personal bhāvam — intimate affection and love ca — and keśavaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
imaṁ sva-nigamaṁ brahmann
imam
thus
sva-nigamam
confidential knowledge of the Vedas in respect to the Supreme Personality of Godhead
brahman
O brāhmaṇa (Vyāsadeva)
avetya mad-anuṣṭhitam
avetya
knowing it well
mat
by me
anuṣṭhitam
executed
adān me jṣānam aiśvaryaṁ
adāt
bestowed upon me
me
me
jṣānam
transcendental knowledge
aiśvaryam
opulence
svasmin bhāvaṁ ca keśavaḥ
svasmin
personal
bhāvam
intimate affection and love
ca
and
keśavaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa.
O brāhmaṇa, thus by the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa I was endowed first with the transcendental knowledge of the Lord as inculcated in the confidential parts of the Vedas, then with the spiritual opulences, and then with His intimate loving service.

Communion with the Lord by transmission of the transcendental sound is nondifferent from the whole spirit Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. It is a completely perfect method for approaching the Lord. By such pure contact with the Lord, without offense of material conceptions (numbering ten), the devotee can rise above the material plane to understand the inner meaning of the Vedic literatures, including the Lord’s existence in the transcendental realm. The Lord reveals His identity gradually to one who has unflinching faith, both in the spiritual master and in the Lord. After this, the devotee is endowed with mystic opulences, which are eight in number. And above all, the devotee is accepted in the confidential entourage of the Lord and is entrusted with specific service of the Lord through the agency of the spiritual master. A pure devotee is more interested in serving the Lord than in showing an exhibition of the mystic powers dormant in him. Śrī Nārada has explained all these from his personal experience, and one can obtain all the facilities which Śrī Nārada obtained by perfecting the chanting process of the sound representation of the Lord. There is no bar for chanting this transcendental sound by anyone, provided it is received through Nārada’s representative, coming down by the chain of disciplic succession, or the paramparā system.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmana! The Lord, knowing that I had undertaken the highest instructions given by him, gave me realization of himself, then powerful siddhis, and finally prema for him.
Commentary

Sva-nigamam (nigama—going within) means instructions given by the Lord, given in his own confidential version of the Vedas (Paṣcarātra). First the Lord gave realization of Himself (jṣānam). Then he gave powers, such as aṇima and other siddhis. Then knowing that I was unattached to those powers, the Lord gave me great prema for him (svasmin bhāvam adāt). The intelligent persons can understand that then Vyāsa prayed to Nārada, “Please teach me this mantra” and then learned this same mantra.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.40

↗
త్వమప్యదభ్రశ్రుత విశ్రుతం విభో: సమాప్యతే యేన విదాం బుభుత్సితమ్ । ప్రాఖ్యాహి దు:ఖైర్ముహురర్దితాత్మనాం సఙ్‍క్లేశనిర్వాణముశన్తి నాన్యథా ॥ ౪౦ ॥
tvam apy adabhra-śruta viśrutaṁ vibhoḥ
[tvam apy adabhra-shruta vishrutam vibhoh]
samāpyate yena vidāṁ bubhutsitam
[samaapyate yena vidaam bubhutsitam]
prākhyāhi duḥkhair muhur arditātmanāṁ
[praakhyaahi duhkhair muhur arditaatmanaam]
saṅkleśa-nirvāṇam uśanti nānyathā
[sanklesha-nirvaanam ushanti naanyathaa]
tvam — your good soul api — also adabhra — vast śruta — Vedic literatures viśrutam — have heard also vibhoḥ — of the Almighty samāpyate — satisfied yena — by which vidām — of the learned bubhutsitam — who always desire to learn transcendental knowledge prākhyāhi — describe duḥkhaiḥ — by miseries muhuḥ — always ardita-ātmanām — suffering mass of people saṅkleśa — sufferings nirvāṇam — mitigation uśanti na — do not get out of anyathā — by other means.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvam apy adabhra-śruta viśrutaṁ vibhoḥ
tvam
your good soul
api
also
adabhra
vast
śruta
Vedic literatures
viśrutam
have heard also
vibhoḥ
of the Almighty
samāpyate yena vidāṁ bubhutsitam
samāpyate
satisfied
yena
by which
vidām
of the learned
bubhutsitam
who always desire to learn transcendental knowledge
prākhyāhi duḥkhair muhur arditātmanāṁ
prākhyāhi
describe
duḥkhaiḥ
by miseries
muhuḥ
always
ardita-ātmanām
suffering mass of people
saṅkleśa-nirvāṇam uśanti nānyathā
saṅkleśa
sufferings
nirvāṇam
mitigation
uśanti na
do not get out of
anyathā
by other means.
Please, therefore, describe the almighty Lord’s activities which you have learned by your vast knowledge of the Vedas, for that will satisfy the hankerings of great learned men and at the same time mitigate the miseries of the masses of common people who are always suffering from material pangs. Indeed, there is no other way to get out of such miseries.

Śrī Nārada Muni from practical experience definitely asserts that the prime solution of all problems of material work is to broadcast very widely the transcendental glories of the Supreme Lord. There are four classes of good men, and there are four classes of bad men also. The four classes of good men acknowledge the authority of the almighty God, and therefore such good men (1) when they are in difficulty, (2) when they are in need of money, (3) when they are advanced in knowledge and (4) when they are inquisitive to know more and more about God, intuitively take shelter of the Lord. As such, Nāradajī advises Vyāsadeva to broadcast the transcendental knowledge of God in terms of the vast Vedic knowledge which he had already attained.

As far as the bad men are concerned, they are also four in number: (1) those who are simply addicted to the mode of progressive fruitive work and thus are subjected to the accompanying miseries, (2) those who are simply addicted to vicious work for sense satisfaction and so suffer the consequence, (3) those who are materially very much advanced in knowledge, but who suffer because they do not have the sense to acknowledge the authority of the almighty Lord, and (4) the class of men who are known as atheists and who therefore purposely hate the very name of God, although they are always in difficulty.

Śrī Nāradajī advised Vyāsadeva to describe the glories of the Lord just to do good to all eight classes of men, both good and bad. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is therefore not meant for any particular class of men or sect. It is for the sincere soul who actually wants his own welfare and peace of mind.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Fifth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Nārada’s Instructions on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for Vyāsadeva.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O omniscient Vyāsa! Explain the glories of Kṛṣṇa, by which the curiosity of persons already having so much knowledge will be satisfied. The wise do not consider that there is any other way to destroy the afflictions of the jīvas tormented by suffering.
Commentary

O knower of many scriptures (adabhra-śruta)! O omniscient one! Please relate the glories (viśrutam) of the Lord. By understanding them, the desire of the knowers who want to know will be satisfied. This means that those who become devoted solely to these confidential scriptures which have the sweet taste of the lord’s glories will not have a desire for jṣāna. Those with intelligence do not consider that the calamity of the jīvas afflicted by suffering can be removed by any other means.

Chapter Six Nārada Achieves Perfection

📝 My note