FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

1.10 · Departure of Lord Kṛṣṇa for Dvārakā

33 verses
L Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16510 chars)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

L - Love (7-11)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

Pure Love

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love “The ultimate result of devotional service is to develop genuine love for the Supreme Personality. Love is a word which is often used in relation with man and woman. And love is the only word that can be properly used to indicate the relation between Lord Krishna and the living entities. The living entities are mentioned as prakrti in the Bhagavad-gita, and in Sanskrit prakrti is a feminine object. The Lord is always described as the parama-purusa , or the supreme male personality. Thus the affection between the Lord and the living entities is something like that between the male and the female. Therefore the term love of Godhead is quite appropriate.” (SB 1.7.7) Industries thrive on it, popstars sing about it, teenagers dream about it, and people are willing to do practically anything for it. To love and be loved - the everlasting, universal dream. Though we wholeheartedly endeavour for that perfect connection in our material sojourn, for the most part it’s a letdown, and the story of life is more a case of frustrated love. Srimad-Bhagavatam introduces us to a world of pure and selfless loving relationships. Because the accounts of loving exchange are so rich, Srimad-Bhagavatam is described as rasamalayam , ‘the abode of loving relish.’ The narrations described in this section give us an insight into these divine exchanges. In Gopala Champu, Jiva Goswami states that hearing of the love exchanged between Krishna and His devotees helps awaken a similar love within the heart of the sincere hearer. When the innate desire for loving connection is reposed in Krishna, everything makes perfect sense, we reconnect with our true purpose and life becomes full of joy and happiness. Some think of God as a strict and unforgiving judge; the old man who sits on a grand throne and hurls down thunderbolts every time someone deviates. Others consider Him a crutch for the weak; an imaginary being who brings peace, hope and comfort, but has little to do with objective reality. Some think of God as a mythological tool of the power-hungry elite, used to keep the masses in line and maintain the status quo. For many, God is simply the cosmic order supplier; a convenient port of call in times of need and want. The Vedic writings paint a radically different picture. Their extraordinary revelation is not simply that God exists, but that He is bursting with colour, character and bliss. According to the Taittiriya Upanisad (2.7.1), God is ‘ raso vai sah ’ – the perfect embodiment of affectionate relationships, loving relish and transcendental sweetness.

Previous The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Next Rasa Theology Last updated 1 year ago

Our Relationship with Krishna

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Our Relationship with Krishna The narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam are an inspiration to revive our own connection with Krishna, who is ever-awaiting the opportunity to engage in relationships of pure love with His devotees. Though Krishna receives the love of unlimited associates, He still considers our love for him so invaluable and indispensable that He yearns for the living entity to reconnect with Him, and personally descends to the world to make all arrangements to that end. Srila Prabhupada explains: “In the spiritual world there are five kinds of relationships with the Supreme Lord - s anta, dasya, sakhya, vatsalya and madhurya . The perverted reflections of these rasas are found in the material world. Land, home, furniture and other inert material objects are related in santa , or the neutral and silent sense, whereas servants work in the dasya relationship. The reciprocation between friends is called sakhya , the affection of a parent for a child is known as vatsalya , and the affairs of conjugal love constitute madhurya . These five relationships in the material world are distorted reflections of the original, pure sentiments, which should be understood and perfected in relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead under the guidance of a bona fide spiritual master. In the material world the perverted rasas bring frustration. If these rasas are re- established with Lord Krishna, the result is eternal, blissful life.” ( CC Adi 1.56 ) By diligently chanting the holy names of Krishna, as outlined by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, anyone can purify their heart and reawaken their original spiritual form ( svarupa ) and relationship with the Lord. We hold back in the relationships of this world because we are uncertain of how others will reciprocate with our love. Furthermore, we are reticent about investing too much in an individual, since it may damage other relationships. When we direct our love towards Krishna, however, we can rest assured that He’ll generously and unfailingly reciprocate with every single endeavour we make. In addition, by nurturing our love for Krishna we automatically develop our love for everyone else, since all living entities are eternally and intimately connected with Him.

Previous Rasa Theology Next A - Attaining the Absolute (12-15) Last updated 1 year ago

Rasa Theology

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Rasa Theology Rupa Goswami, the leading disciple of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, dissected the vast theology of rasa (loving relish) and systematically presented it in his masterpiece known as the Bhakti-rasamrita Sindhu, literally translated as the ‘Nectarean ocean of devotional sentiments.’ Drawing from the Sanskrit dramaturgy of Bharata Muni, Rupa Goswami analyses the subtle loving feelings that souls experience in a variety of relationships with Krishna. Just as a full meal contains salty, spicy, pungent and sweet preparations, all combining to give a complete experience, so the various tastes of rasa create a unique spiritual experience. Rupa Goswami poetically compares the devotees of the Lord to sharks ( makara ) who swim deep in this ocean of love, oblivious to the small rivers of spiritual side benefits (like liberation from suffering). Whilst swimming in the oceanic relationship with Krishna, they find the most valuable of jewels in the depths of the seabed. The love experienced between the living entity and God can take many forms, each with unique intensities. To enter such exchanges, one must first become entirely averse to the allure of material pleasures, which block one’s ability to enter the arena of pure spiritual love. In the early stages of spirituality, one may gravitate towards an impersonal conception of the Supreme. God is seen as an energy, consciousness or all-pervading influence. True love, however, is experienced between persons, where there is opportunity for interaction, exchange and an active reciprocation. Though the Lord is the complete whole, both personal and impersonal, His Supreme personal feature invites a more intimate relationship where deeper emotions can be experienced. The Personality of Godhead manifests Himself in a variety of forms. Vishnu is God at work – the personality who creates and maintains the entire cosmos. Krishna, on the other hand, is God at home – the personality who is more concerned with intimate relationships and loving interactions. Thus, according to rasa theology, a more intimate connection can be established with Krishna. Amongst devotees of Krishna, there are also variations. Some focus on His majestic qualities and awe-inspiring opulence and power ( aisvarya ). Their understanding gives rise to a mood of respect and reverence, which invariably creates a distance too. Those who focus on Krishna’s sweetness ( madhurya ), captured by His irresistible beauty and charm, transcend such barriers and enter into closer exchanges. Of such confidential devotees, there are those who are in union with Krishna and experience the ecstasy of meeting Him face-to-face ( sambhoga ). Other devotees, however, are subjected to separation from Krishna ( vipralambha ). Their desperation and anticipation to meet Him creates a heightened emotional churning and unrelenting yearning. The gopis of Vrindavana are the prime example of this. Their feelings of transcendental separation are considered the epitome of divine love for God [ 3 ].

Previous Pure Love Next Our Relationship with Krishna Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Arjuna

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Arjuna Chapter 7 Having answered the first query, Suta Goswami turns his attention to the second question of the sages: “How was Sukadeva Goswami viewed by others, and how did his meeting with Maharaja Pariksit transpire?” Before directly addressing this, Suta Goswami narrated the events which transpired at the conclusion of the Kuruksetra battle, which is when Maharaja Pariksit was born. When Asvatthama was being chased by Arjuna due to his heinous act of killing the sleeping sons of Draupadi, he released a deadly brahmastra weapon in a frenzy of panic. Arjuna was startled and confused, unsure of what his next move should be. Since surrendered devotees see the Lord as their only protector, Arjuna instinctively approached Krishna in his time of need and sought counsel. Though in the most intense of situations, Arjuna lovingly glorified Krishna and expressed his full dependence upon Him. Taking Krishna’s advice, Arjuna counteracted Asvatthama’s weapon with his own brahmastra and thus captured the ruthless warrior. There were conflicting proposals as to what Asvatthama’s fate should be – some called for his death while others wanted to spare him. Arjuna ingeniously cut the jewel and hair from Asvatthama’s head. The warrior was utterly humiliated but still alive, and Arjuna successfully reconciled all the different opinions by simultaneously ‘killing’ him and sparing his life.

Previous L - Love (7-11) Next The Love of Uttara Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Bhismadeva

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Bhismadeva Chapter 9 Overwhelmed and traumatised by the massacre that had occurred at Kuruksetra, Maharaja Yuddhistira went to visit Bhismadeva, accompanied by Krishna and the Pandavas. Lying on the bed of arrows, Bhismadeva praised the Pandavas for patiently tolerating so many devious intrigues and grievous injustices. Despite their piety, knowledge, strength, righteousness, and having Krishna as their constant companion, the Pandavas were not exempt from difficulties. The divine plans of the Lord, Bhismadeva said, are practically impossible to decode. With deep gratitude and appreciation, Bhismadeva beautifully glorified Krishna and expressed his incomparable fortune at having the Supreme Lord present during his final hours. The legendary grandsire imparted his concluding words of wisdom to Maharaja Yuddhistira, offering a variety of profound insights on the duties of human beings ( dharma ) in various contexts of life. Immersing his consciousness in Krishna, he offered his deep appreciation to the Lord and prayed for the ability to remember Him at death. Bhismadeva thus departed this mortal world in perfect consciousness. His spiritual purity transported him to the Lord’s abode. With the historic departure of Bhismadeva, Maharaja Yuddhistira was duly enthroned as the next leader.

Previous The Love of Kunti Next The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Chapter 11 The separation in Hastinapura was contrasted with a jubilant meeting in Dwaraka. In that city of immeasurable opulence, all the inhabitants excitedly welcomed Krishna and offered Him an abundance of gifts in great love. Krishna was reunited with His parents, Vasudeva and Devaki, and bowed down to them with great affection. When Krishna entered the palaces of His 16,108 queens, they were completely overwhelmed at the sight of their Lord and husband, and a variety of loving sentiments arose within them. They embraced Krishna in their hearts, with their eyes, and through their sons. Even prostitutes and outcastes lovingly greeted Krishna, who, being equally affectionate to all, unhesitatingly reciprocated with each and everyone’s devotion.

Previous The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Next Pure Love Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Chapter 10 Having remained in Hastinapura for a few months, Krishna decided it was time to leave. As He departed, the ladies began crying profusely, while other residents of Hastinapura nearly fainted from the feelings of impending separation. Their hearts were melting in the pot of attraction for Krishna. Such are the intense emotions of Krishna’s pure devotees. Maharaja Yuddhistira provided Krishna with martial protection and the Pandavas followed along as far as they could to see Him off. It was an agonising departure. In separation, lovers feel one moment to be like millions of years. This unique type of emotion, known as vipralambha-bhava , paradoxically generates the most intense connection with Krishna.

Previous The Love of Bhismadeva Next The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Kunti

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Kunti Chapter 8 Having witnessed yet another exhibition of Krishna’s love, compassion and unrelenting protection, Queen Kunti offered a garland of celebrated prayers. She glorified the wonderful guardianship that Krishna offers His devotees, but simultaneously prayed for further calamities, which help the sincere devotee to remember Him. The exalted Queen expressed how true devotion is born in the hearts of those who are materially exhausted, praying that her affectionate family ties would not hinder her spiritual progress. She praised the Lord’s divine appearance, which creates a spiritual resurgence, but lamented the impending separation from Krishna. That Queen Kunti never lost faith in Krishna, despite so many catastrophic reversals, indicates the incomparable degree of love and devotion that she exuded.

Previous The Love of Uttara Next The Love of Bhismadeva Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Uttara

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Uttara Chapter 8 Following this incident, Krishna performed the funeral rites for the countless soldiers who died in the battle of Kuruksetra. The Lord then prepared to leave for Dwaraka. Just then, Asvatthama directed another deadly brahmastra toward the pregnant Uttara (wife of Abhimanyu, Arjuna’s son) in a last-gasp attempt to terminate the final heir in the Pandava dynasty. Another shocking reversal! Though personally detached from the impending danger, Uttara desperately begged Krishna to save the child in her womb. Just like Arjuna, she knew only Krishna as the Supreme controller and the Supreme friend. Always ready to serve His unalloyed devotees, Krishna, as Paramatma (Supersoul in the heart), covered and protected the embryo with His personal energy, and simultaneously foiled the brahmastra weapon.

Previous The Love of Arjuna Next The Love of Kunti Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.1

↗
శౌనక ఉవాచ హత్వా స్వరిక్థస్పృధ ఆతతాయినో యుధిష్ఠిరో ధర్మభృతాం వరిష్ఠ: । సహానుజై: ప్రత్యవరుద్ధభోజన: కథం ప్రవృత్త: కిమకారషీత్తత: ॥ ౧ ॥
śaunaka uvāca
[shaunaka uvaacha]
hatvā svariktha-spṛdha ātatāyino
[hatvaa svariktha-spridha aatataayino]
yudhiṣṭhiro dharma-bhṛtāṁ variṣṭhaḥ
[yudhishthiro dharma-bhritaam varishthah]
sahānujaiḥ pratyavaruddha-bhojanaḥ
[sahaanujaih pratyavaruddha-bhojanah]
kathaṁ pravṛttaḥ kim akāraṣīt tataḥ
[katham pravrittah kim akaarasheet tatah]
śaunakaḥ uvāca — Śaunaka inquired hatvā — after killing svariktha — the legal inheritance spṛdhaḥ — desiring to usurp ātatāyinaḥ — the aggressor yudhiṣṭhiraḥ — King Yudhiṣṭhira dharma-bhṛtām — of those who strictly follow religious principles variṣṭhaḥ — greatest saha-anujaiḥ — with his younger brothers pratyavaruddha — restricted bhojanaḥ — acceptance of necessities katham — how pravṛttaḥ — engaged kim — what akāraṣīt — executed tataḥ — thereafter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaunaka uvāca
śaunakaḥ uvāca
Śaunaka inquired
hatvā svariktha-spṛdha ātatāyino
hatvā
after killing
svariktha
the legal inheritance
spṛdhaḥ
desiring to usurp
ātatāyinaḥ
the aggressor
yudhiṣṭhiro dharma-bhṛtāṁ variṣṭhaḥ
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
King Yudhiṣṭhira
dharma-bhṛtām
of those who strictly follow religious principles
variṣṭhaḥ
greatest
sahānujaiḥ pratyavaruddha-bhojanaḥ
saha-anujaiḥ
with his younger brothers
pratyavaruddha
restricted
bhojanaḥ
acceptance of necessities
kathaṁ pravṛttaḥ kim akāraṣīt tataḥ
katham
how
pravṛttaḥ
engaged
kim
what
akāraṣīt
executed
tataḥ
thereafter.
Śaunaka Muni asked: After killing his enemies who desired to usurp his rightful inheritance, how did the greatest of all religious men, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, assisted by his brothers, rule his subjects? Surely he could not freely enjoy his kingdom with unrestricted consciousness.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the greatest of all men of religion. Thus he was not at all inclined to fight with his cousins for the sake of enjoying the kingdom; he fought for the right cause because the kingdom of Hastināpura was his rightful inheritance and his cousins wanted to usurp it for themselves. He fought, therefore, for the right cause under the guidance of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but he could not enjoy the results of his victory because his cousins were all killed in the fight. He therefore ruled over the kingdom as a matter of duty, assisted by his younger brothers. The inquiry was important for Śaunaka Ṛṣi, who wanted to know about the behavior of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira when he was at ease to enjoy the kingdom.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: After killing the enemy desiring his rightful kingdom, how did Yudhiṣṭhira, the best of righteous men, while enjoying what he had won back, take up ruling the kingdom along with his younger brothers? What did he do?
Commentary

In tenth chapter describes how Kṛṣṇa after placing the Pāṇḍavas in the kingdom without obstacles went to Dvārakā and was praised by the Yādavas.

Since it was mentioned in a general way that with the agreement of Kṛṣṇa the Pāṇḍavas ruled the kingdom, the inquisitive sages ask about this. The enemies desired his wealth (svarikthe). They obtained it, and then he took it back from them (pratyavaruddha) and was able to enjoy it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.2

↗
సూత ఉవాచ వంశం కురోర్వంశదవాగ్నినిర్హృతం సంరోహయిత్వా భవభావనో హరి: । నివేశయిత్వా నిజరాజ్య ఈశ్వరో యుధిష్ఠిరం ప్రీతమనా బభూవ హ ॥ ౨ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
vaṁśaṁ kuror vaṁśa-davāgni-nirhṛtaṁ
[vamsham kuror vamsha-davaagni-nirhritam]
saṁrohayitvā bhava-bhāvano hariḥ
[samrohayitvaa bhava-bhaavano harih]
niveśayitvā nija-rājya īśvaro
[niveshayitvaa nija-raajya eeshvaro]
yudhiṣṭhiraṁ prīta-manā babhūva ha
[yudhishthiram preeta-manaa babhoova ha]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta Gosvāmī replied vaṁśam — dynasty kuroḥ — of King Kuru vaṁśa-dava-agni — a forest fire set by the bamboos nirhṛtam — exhausted saṁrohayitvā — seedling of the dynasty bhava-bhāvanaḥ — the maintainer of creation hariḥ — the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa niveśayitvā — having reestablished nija-rājye — in his own kingdom īśvaraḥ — the Supreme Lord yudhiṣṭhiram — unto Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira prīta-manāḥ — pleased in His mind babhūva ha — became.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta Gosvāmī replied
vaṁśam
dynasty
vaṁśaṁ kuror vaṁśa-davāgni-nirhṛtaṁ
kuroḥ
of King Kuru
vaṁśa-dava-agni
a forest fire set by the bamboos
nirhṛtam
exhausted
saṁrohayitvā bhava-bhāvano hariḥ
saṁrohayitvā
seedling of the dynasty
bhava-bhāvanaḥ
the maintainer of creation
hariḥ
the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa
niveśayitvā nija-rājya īśvaro
niveśayitvā
having reestablished
nija-rājye
in his own kingdom
īśvaraḥ
the Supreme Lord
yudhiṣṭhiraṁ prīta-manā babhūva ha
yudhiṣṭhiram
unto Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
prīta-manāḥ
pleased in His mind
babhūva ha
became.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is the maintainer of the world, became pleased after reestablishing Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira in his own kingdom and after restoring the Kuru dynasty, which had been exhausted by the bamboo fire of anger.

This world is compared to a forest fire caused by the cohesion of bamboo bushes. Such a forest fire takes place automatically, for bamboo cohesion occurs without external cause. Similarly, in the material world the wrath of those who want to lord it over material nature interacts, and the fire of war takes place, exhausting the unwanted population. Such fires or wars take place, and the Lord has nothing to do with them. But because He wants to maintain the creation, He desires the mass of people to follow the right path of self-realization, which enables the living beings to enter into the kingdom of God. The Lord wants the suffering human beings to come back home, back to Him, and cease to suffer the threefold material pangs. The whole plan of creation is made in that way, and one who does not come to his senses suffers in the material world by pangs inflicted by the illusory energy of the Lord. The Lord therefore wants His bona fide representative to rule the world. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa descended to establish this sort of regime and to kill the unwanted persons who have nothing to do with His plan. The Battle of Kurukṣetra was fought according to the plan of the Lord so that undesirable persons could get out of the world and a peaceful kingdom under His devotee could be established. The Lord was therefore fully satisfied when King Yudhiṣṭhira was on the throne and the seedling of the dynasty of Kuru, in the person of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, was saved.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Kṛṣṇa, upon whom Śiva meditates, became pleased, having increased the Kuru family which was destroyed by the forest fire of anger, by protecting Parīkṣit, and by installing Yudhiṣṭhira in his rightful kingdom.
Commentary

The answer shows that he took up the ruling of the country only after seeing that Kṛṣṇa was pleased. Kṛṣṇa increased the Kuru family, which had been destroyed by the fire (of anger) in the bamboo forest, by saving Parīkṣit. Just as the bamboo burns by the fire ignited by rubbing of the bamboos, the Kuru family was destroyed by a war which arose from mutual anger. Kṛṣṇa makes even Śiva (bhava) meditate on his pastimes (bhāvanaḥ).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.3

↗
నిశమ్య భీష్మోక్తమథాచ్యుతోక్తం ప్రవృత్తవిజ్ఞానవిధూతవిభ్రమ: । శశాస గామిన్ద్ర ఇవాజితాశ్రయ: పరిధ్యుపాన్తామనుజానువర్తిత: ॥ ౩ ॥
niśamya bhīṣmoktam athācyutoktaṁ
[nishamya bheeshmoktam athaachyutoktam]
pravṛtta-vijṣāna-vidhūta-vibhramaḥ
[pravritta-vijshaana-vidhoota-vibhramah]
śaśāsa gām indra ivājitāśrayaḥ
[shashaasa gaam indra ivaajitaashrayah]
paridhyupāntām anujānuvartitaḥ
[paridhyupaantaam anujaanuvartitah]
niśamya — after listening bhīṣma-uktam — what was spoken by Bhīṣmadeva atha — as also acyuta-uktam — what was spoken by the infallible Lord Kṛṣṇa pravṛtta — being engaged in vijṣāna — perfect knowledge vidhūta — completely washed vibhramaḥ — all misgivings śaśāsa — ruled over gām — the earth indra — the king of the heavenly planet iva — like ajita-āśrayaḥ — protected by the invincible Lord paridhi-upāntām — including the seas anuja — the younger brothers anuvartitaḥ — being followed by them.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
niśamya bhīṣmoktam athācyutoktaṁ
niśamya
after listening
bhīṣma-uktam
what was spoken by Bhīṣmadeva
atha
as also
acyuta-uktam
what was spoken by the infallible Lord Kṛṣṇa
pravṛtta-vijṣāna-vidhūta-vibhramaḥ
pravṛtta
being engaged in
vijṣāna
perfect knowledge
vidhūta
completely washed
vibhramaḥ
all misgivings
śaśāsa gām indra ivājitāśrayaḥ
śaśāsa
ruled over
gām
the earth
indra
the king of the heavenly planet
iva
like
ajita-āśrayaḥ
protected by the invincible Lord
paridhyupāntām anujānuvartitaḥ
paridhi-upāntām
including the seas
anuja
the younger brothers
anuvartitaḥ
being followed by them.
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, after being enlightened by what was spoken by Bhīṣmadeva and Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the infallible, engaged himself in matters of perfect knowledge because all his misgivings were eradicated. Thus he ruled over the earth and seas and was followed by his younger brothers.

The modern English law of primogeniture, or the law of inheritance by the firstborn, was also prevalent in those days when Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira ruled the earth and seas. In those days the King of Hastināpura (now part of New Delhi) was the emperor of the world, including the seas, up to the time of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the grandson of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira’s younger brothers were acting as his ministers and commanders of state, and there was full cooperation between the perfectly religious brothers of the King. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the ideal king or representative of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa to rule over the kingdom of earth and was comparable to King Indra, the representative ruler of the heavenly planets. The demigods like Indra, Candra, Sūrya, Varuṇa and Vāyu are representative kings of different planets of the universe, and similarly Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was also one of them, ruling over the kingdom of the earth. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was not a typically unenlightened political leader of modern democracy. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was instructed by Bhīṣmadeva and the infallible Lord also, and therefore he had full knowledge of everything in perfection.

The modern elected executive head of a state is just like a puppet because he has no kingly power. Even if he is enlightened like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, he cannot do anything out of his own good will due to his constitutional position. Therefore, there are so many states over the earth quarreling because of ideological differences or other selfish motives. But a king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira had no ideology of his own. He had but to follow the instructions of the infallible Lord and the Lord’s representative and the authorized agent, Bhīṣmadeva. It is instructed in the śāstras that one should follow the great authority and the infallible Lord without any personal motive and manufactured ideology. Therefore, it was possible for Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule the whole world, including the seas, because the principles were infallible and universally applicable to everyone. The conception of one world state can only be fulfilled if we can follow the infallible authority. An imperfect human being cannot create an ideology acceptable to everyone. Only the perfect and the infallible can create a program which is applicable at every place and can be followed by all in the world. It is the person who rules, and not the impersonal government. If the person is perfect, the government is perfect. If the person is a fool, the government is a fool’s paradise. That is the law of nature. There are so many stories of imperfect kings or executive heads. Therefore, the executive head must be a trained person like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, and he must have the full autocratic power to rule over the world. The conception of a world state can take shape only under the regime of a perfect king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. The world was happy in those days because there were kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule over the world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After hearing the words of Bhīṣma and Kṛṣṇa, and thereby gaining knowledge and removing ignorance, Yudhiṣṭhira, having taken shelter of Kṛṣṇa, ruled the earth extending to the oceans with the cooperation of his brothers, just as Indra, having taken shelter of Upendra, rules over heaven extending in all directions with the compliance of Upendra.
Commentary

The knowledge which appeared (pravṛtta-vijṣāna) was that the world is dependent on the Lord, and is not independent. He was free of the illusion that “I am the doer (vidhūta-vibhramaḥ).” Gām means earth and heaven. Ajita refers to Kṛṣṇa and Upendra (Indra takes shelter of Upendra.) Paridhi means ocean and also all directions upwards as well (in the case of Indra). Anujānuvartitaḥ means with the compliance of his younger brothers, or with the compliance of his younger brother Upendra (in the case of Indra).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.4

↗
కామం వవర్ష పర్జన్య: సర్వకామదుఘా మహీ । సిషిచు: స్మ వ్రజాన్ గావ: పయసోధస్వతీర్ముదా ॥ ౪ ॥
kāmaṁ vavarṣa parjanyaḥ
[kaamam vavarsha parjanyah]
sarva-kāma-dughā mahī
[sarva-kaama-dughaa mahee]
siṣicuḥ sma vrajān gāvaḥ
[sishichuh sma vrajaan gaavah]
payasodhasvatīr mudā
[payasodhasvateer mudaa]
kāmam — everything needed vavarṣa — was showered parjanyaḥ — rains sarva — everything kāma — necessities dughā — producer mahī — the land siṣicuḥ sma — moisten vrajān — pasturing grounds gāvaḥ — the cow payasā udhasvatīḥ — due to swollen milk bags mudā — because of a joyful attitude.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāmaṁ vavarṣa parjanyaḥ
kāmam
everything needed
vavarṣa
was showered
parjanyaḥ
rains
sarva-kāma-dughā mahī
sarva
everything
kāma
necessities
dughā
producer
mahī
the land
siṣicuḥ sma vrajān gāvaḥ
siṣicuḥ sma
moisten
vrajān
pasturing grounds
gāvaḥ
the cow
payasodhasvatīr mudā
payasā udhasvatīḥ
due to swollen milk bags
mudā
because of a joyful attitude.
During the reign of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, the clouds showered all the water that people needed, and the earth produced all the necessities of man in profusion. Due to its fatty milk bag and cheerful attitude, the cow used to moisten the grazing ground with milk.

The basic principle of economic development is centered on land and cows. The necessities of human society are food grains, fruits, milk, minerals, clothing, wood, etc. One requires all these items to fulfill the material needs of the body. Certainly one does not require flesh and fish or iron tools and machinery. During the regime of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, all over the world there were regulated rainfalls. Rainfalls are not in the control of the human being. The heavenly king Indradeva is the controller of rains, and he is the servant of the Lord. When the Lord is obeyed by the king and the people under the king’s administration, there are regulated rains from the horizon, and these rains are the causes of all varieties of production on the land. Not only do regulated rains help ample production of grains and fruits, but when they combine with astronomical influences there is ample production of valuable stones and pearls. Grains and vegetables can sumptuously feed a man and animals, and a fatty cow delivers enough milk to supply a man sumptuously with vigor and vitality. If there is enough milk, enough grains, enough fruit, enough cotton, enough silk and enough jewels, then why do the people need cinemas, houses of prostitution, slaughterhouses, etc.? What is the need of an artificial luxurious life of cinema, cars, radio, flesh and hotels? Has this civilization produced anything but quarreling individually and nationally? Has this civilization enhanced the cause of equality and fraternity by sending thousands of men into a hellish factory and the warfields at the whims of a particular man?

It is said here that the cows used to moisten the pasturing land with milk because their milk bags were fatty and the animals were joyful. Do they not require, therefore, proper protection for a joyful life by being fed with a sufficient quantity of grass in the field? Why should men kill cows for their selfish purposes? Why should man not be satisfied with grains, fruits and milk, which, combined together, can produce hundreds and thousands of palatable dishes? Why are there slaughterhouses all over the world to kill innocent animals? Mahārāja Parīkṣit, grandson of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, while touring his vast kingdom, saw a black man attempting to kill a cow. The King at once arrested the butcher and chastised him sufficiently. Should not a king or executive head protect the lives of the poor animals who are unable to defend themselves? Is this humanity? Are not the animals of a country citizens also? Then why are they allowed to be butchered in organized slaughterhouses? Are these the signs of equality, fraternity and nonviolence?

Therefore, in contrast with the modern, advanced, civilized form of government, an autocracy like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira’s is by far superior to a so-called democracy in which animals are killed and a man less than an animal is allowed to cast votes for another less-than-animal man.

We are all creatures of material nature. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that the Lord Himself is the seed-giving father and material nature is the mother of all living beings in all shapes. Thus mother material nature has enough foodstuff both for animals and for men, by the grace of the Father Almighty, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. The human being is the elder brother of all other living beings. He is endowed with intelligence more powerful than animals’ for realizing the course of nature and the indications of the Almighty Father. Human civilizations should depend on the production of material nature without artificially attempting economic development to turn the world into a chaos of artificial greed and power only for the purpose of artificial luxuries and sense gratification. This is but the life of dogs and hogs.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The clouds rained sufficient water, the earth yielded all desired products and the cows with full udders in joy sprinkled milk in the cow pens.
Commentary

Udhasvatī means full udders.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.5

↗
నద్య: సముద్రా గిరయ: సవనస్పతివీరుధ: । ఫలన్త్యోషధయ: సర్వా: కామమన్వృతు తస్య వై ॥ ౫ ॥
nadyaḥ samudrā girayaḥ
[nadyah samudraa girayah]
savanaspati-vīrudhaḥ
[savanaspati-veerudhah]
phalanty oṣadhayaḥ sarvāḥ
[phalanty oshadhayah sarvaah]
kāmam anvṛtu tasya vai
[kaamam anvritu tasya vai]
nadyaḥ — rivers samudrāḥ — oceans girayaḥ — hills and mountains savanaspati — vegetables vīrudhaḥ — creepers phalanti — active oṣadhayaḥ — drugs sarvāḥ — all kāmam — necessities anvṛtu — seasonal tasya — for the King vai — certainly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nadyaḥ samudrā girayaḥ
nadyaḥ
rivers
samudrāḥ
oceans
girayaḥ
hills and mountains
savanaspati-vīrudhaḥ
savanaspati
vegetables
vīrudhaḥ
creepers
phalanty oṣadhayaḥ sarvāḥ
phalanti
active
oṣadhayaḥ
drugs
sarvāḥ
all
kāmam anvṛtu tasya vai
kāmam
necessities
anvṛtu
seasonal
tasya
for the King
vai
certainly.
The rivers, oceans, hills, mountains, forests, creepers and active drugs, in every season, paid their tax quota to the King in profusion.

Since Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was under the protection of the ajita, the infallible Lord, as above mentioned, the properties of the Lord, namely the rivers, oceans, hills, forests, etc., were all pleased, and they used to supply their respective quota of taxes to the King. The secret to success is to take refuge under the protection of the Supreme Lord. Without His sanction, nothing can be possible. To make economic development by our own endeavors on the strength of tools and machinery is not all. The sanction of the Supreme Lord must be there, otherwise despite all instrumental arrangements everything will be unsuccessful. The ultimate cause of success is the daiva, the Supreme. Kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira knew perfectly well that the king is the agent of the Supreme Lord to look after the welfare of the mass of people. Actually the state belongs to the Supreme Lord. The rivers, oceans, forests, hills, drugs, etc., are not creations of man. They are all creations of the Supreme Lord, and the living being is allowed to make use of the property of the Lord for the service of the Lord. Today’s slogan is that everything is for the people, and therefore the government is for the people and by the people. But to produce a new species of humanity at the present moment on the basis of God consciousness and perfection of human life — the ideology of godly communism — the world has to again follow in the footsteps of kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira or Parīkṣit. There is enough of everything by the will of the Lord, and we can make proper use of things to live comfortably without enmity between man and man, or man and animal, or man and nature. The control of the Lord is everywhere, and if the Lord is pleased, every part of nature will be pleased. The river will flow profusely to fertilize the land; the oceans will supply sufficient quantities of minerals, pearls and jewels; the forest will supply sufficient wood, drugs and vegetables, and the seasonal changes will effectively help produce fruits and flowers in profuse quantity. The artificial way of living depending on factories and tools can render so-called happiness only to a limited number at the cost of millions. Since the energy of the mass of people is engaged in factory production, the natural products are being hampered, and for this the mass is unhappy. Without being educated properly, the mass of people are following in the footsteps of the vested interests by exploiting natural reserves, and therefore there is acute competition between individual and individual and nation and nation. There is no control by the trained agent of the Lord. We must look into the defects of modern civilization by comparison here, and should follow in the footsteps of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to cleanse man and wipe out anachronisms.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The rivers, oceans, mountains, trees, shrubs, and herbs of that kingdom yielded their products in every season.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.6

↗
నాధయో వ్యాధయ: క్లేశా దైవభూతాత్మహేతవ: । అజాతశత్రావభవన్ జన్తూనాం రాజ్ఞి కర్హిచిత్ ॥ ౬ ॥
nādhayo vyādhayaḥ kleśā
[naadhayo vyaadhayah kleshaa]
daiva-bhūtātma-hetavaḥ
[daiva-bhootaatma-hetavah]
ajāta-śatrāv abhavan
[ajaata-shatraav abhavan]
jantūnāṁ rājṣi karhicit
[jantoonaam raajshi karhichit]
na — never ādhayaḥ — anxieties vyādhayaḥ — diseases kleśāḥ — trouble due to excessive heat and cold daiva-bhūta-ātma — all due to the body, supernatural power and other living beings hetavaḥ — due to the cause of ajāta-śatrau — unto one who has no enemy abhavan — happened jantūnām — of the living beings rājṣi — unto the King karhicit — at any time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nādhayo vyādhayaḥ kleśā
na
never
ādhayaḥ
anxieties
vyādhayaḥ
diseases
kleśāḥ
trouble due to excessive heat and cold
daiva-bhūtātma-hetavaḥ
daiva-bhūta-ātma
all due to the body, supernatural power and other living beings
hetavaḥ
due to the cause of
ajāta-śatrāv abhavan
ajāta-śatrau
unto one who has no enemy
abhavan
happened
jantūnāṁ rājṣi karhicit
jantūnām
of the living beings
rājṣi
unto the King
karhicit
at any time.
Because of the King’s having no enemy, the living beings were not at any time disturbed by mental agonies, diseases, or excessive heat or cold.

To be nonviolent to human beings and to be a killer or enemy of the poor animals is Satan’s philosophy. In this age there is enmity toward poor animals, and therefore the poor creatures are always anxious. The reaction of the poor animals is being forced on human society, and therefore there is always the strain of cold or hot war between men, individually, collectively or nationally. At the time of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, there were no different nations, although there were different subordinate states. The whole world was united, and the supreme head, being a trained king like Yudhiṣṭhira, kept all the inhabitants free from anxiety, diseases and excessive heat and cold. They were not only economically well-to-do, but also physically fit and undisturbed by supernatural power, by enmity from other living beings and by disturbance of bodily and mental agonies. There is a proverb in Bengali that a bad king spoils the kingdom and a bad housewife spoils the family. This truth is applicable here also. Because the King was pious and obedient to the Lord and sages, because he was no one’s enemy and because he was a recognized agent of the Lord and therefore protected by Him, all the citizens under the King’s protection were, so to speak, directly protected by the Lord and His authorized agents. Unless one is pious and recognized by the Lord, he cannot make others happy who are under his care. There is full cooperation between man and God and man and nature, and this conscious cooperation between man and God and man and nature, as exemplified by King Yudhiṣṭhira, can bring about happiness, peace and prosperity in the world. The attitude of exploiting one another, the custom of the day, will only bring misery.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While Yudhiṣṭhira ruled, the living beings suffered no anxieties, sickness or inconveniences caused by nature, by other living beings or by themselves.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.7

↗
ఉషిత్వా హాస్తినపురే మాసాన్ కతిపయాన్ హరి: । సుహృదాం చ విశోకాయ స్వసుశ్చ ప్రియకామ్యయా ॥ ౭ ॥
uṣitvā hāstinapure
[ushitvaa haastinapure]
māsān katipayān hariḥ
[maasaan katipayaan harih]
suhṛdāṁ ca viśokāya
[suhridaam cha vishokaaya]
svasuś ca priya-kāmyayā
[svasush cha priya-kaamyayaa]
uṣitvā — staying hāstinapure — in the city of Hastināpura māsān — months katipayān — a few hariḥ — Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa suhṛdām — relatives ca — also viśokāya — for pacifying them svasuḥ — the sister ca — and priya-kāmyayā — for pleasing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uṣitvā hāstinapure
uṣitvā
staying
hāstinapure
in the city of Hastināpura
māsān katipayān hariḥ
māsān
months
katipayān
a few
hariḥ
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
suhṛdāṁ ca viśokāya
suhṛdām
relatives
ca
also
viśokāya
for pacifying them
svasuś ca priya-kāmyayā
svasuḥ
the sister
ca
and
priya-kāmyayā
for pleasing.
Śrī Hari, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, resided at Hastināpura for a few months to pacify His relatives and please His own sister [Subhadrā].

Kṛṣṇa was to start for Dvārakā, His own kingdom, after the Battle of Kurukṣetra and Yudhiṣṭhira’s being enthroned, but to oblige the request of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and to show special mercy to Bhīṣmadeva, Lord Kṛṣṇa stopped at Hastināpura, the capital of the Pāṇḍavas. The Lord decided to stay especially to pacify the aggrieved King as well as to please Subhadrā, sister of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Subhadrā was especially to be pacified because she lost her only son, Abhimanyu, who was just married. The boy left his wife, Uttarā, mother of Mahārāja Parīkṣit. The Lord is always pleased to satisfy His devotees in any capacity. Only His devotees can play the parts of His relatives. The Lord is absolute.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Staying for several months in Hastināpura to console his friends and please Subhadrā, Kṛṣṇa, after taking permission to leave, addressing and embracing Yudhiṣṭhira, bid farewell and mounted his chariot, while being addressed and embraced by others.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.8

↗
ఆమన్‍త్ర్య చాభ్యనుజ్ఞాత: పరిష్వజ్యాభివాద్య తమ్ । ఆరురోహ రథం కైశ్చిత్పరిష్వక్తోఽభివాదిత: ॥ ౮ ॥
āmantrya cābhyanujṣātaḥ
[aamantrya chaabhyanujshaatah]
pariṣvajyābhivādya tam
[parishvajyaabhivaadya tam]
āruroha rathaṁ kaiścit
[aaruroha ratham kaishchit]
pariṣvakto ’bhivāditaḥ
[parishvakto ’bhivaaditah]
āmantrya — taking permission ca — and abhyanujṣātaḥ — being permitted pariṣvajya — embracing abhivādya — bowing down at the feet tam — unto Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira āruroha — ascended ratham — the chariot kaiścit — by someone pariṣvaktaḥ — being embraced abhivāditaḥ — being offered obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āmantrya cābhyanujṣātaḥ
āmantrya
taking permission
ca
and
abhyanujṣātaḥ
being permitted
pariṣvajyābhivādya tam
pariṣvajya
embracing
abhivādya
bowing down at the feet
tam
unto Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
āruroha rathaṁ kaiścit
āruroha
ascended
ratham
the chariot
kaiścit
by someone
pariṣvakto ’bhivāditaḥ
pariṣvaktaḥ
being embraced
abhivāditaḥ
being offered obeisances.
Afterwards, when the Lord asked permission to depart and the King gave it, the Lord offered His respects to Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira by bowing down at his feet, and the King embraced Him. After this the Lord, being embraced by others and receiving their obeisances, got into His chariot.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the elder cousin of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and therefore while departing from him the Lord bowed down at the King’s feet. The King embraced Him as a younger brother, although the King knew perfectly well that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord takes pleasure when some of His devotees accept Him as less important in terms of love. No one is greater than or equal to the Lord, but He takes pleasure in being treated as younger than His devotees. These are all transcendental pastimes of the Lord. The impersonalist cannot enter into the supernatural roles played by the devotee of the Lord. Thereafter Bhīma and Arjuna embraced the Lord because they were of the same age, but Nakula and Sahadeva bowed down before the Lord because they were younger than He.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Staying for several months in Hastināpura to console his friends and please Subhadrā, Kṛṣṇa, after taking permission to leave, addressing and embracing Yudhiṣṭhira, bid farewell and mounted his chariot, while being addressed and embraced by others.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.9-10

↗
సుభద్రా ద్రౌపదీ కున్తీ విరాటతనయా తథా । గాన్ధారీ ధృతరాష్ట్రశ్చ యుయుత్సుర్గౌతమో యమౌ ॥ ౯ ॥ వృకోదరశ్చ ధౌమ్యశ్చ స్త్రియో మత్స్యసుతాదయ: । న సేహిరే విముహ్యన్తో విరహం శార్ఙ్గధన్వన: ॥ ౧౦ ॥
subhadrā draupadī kuntī
[subhadraa draupadee kuntee]
virāṭa-tanayā tathā
[viraata-tanayaa tathaa]
gāndhārī dhṛtarāṣṭraś ca
[gaandhaaree dhritaraashtrash cha]
yuyutsur gautamo yamau
[yuyutsur gautamo yamau]
vṛkodaraś ca dhaumyaś ca
[vrikodarash cha dhaumyash cha]
striyo matsya-sutādayaḥ
[striyo matsya-sutaadayah]
na sehire vimuhyanto
[na sehire vimuhyanto]
virahaṁ śārṅga-dhanvanaḥ
[viraham shaarnga-dhanvanah]
subhadrā — the sister of Kṛṣṇa draupadī — the wife of the Pāṇḍavas kuntī — the mother of the Pāṇḍavas virāṭa-tanayā — the daughter of Virāṭa (Uttarā) tathā — also gāndhārī — the mother of Duryodhana dhṛtarāṣṭraḥ — the father of Duryodhana ca — and yuyutsuḥ — the son of Dhṛtarāṣṭra by his vaiśya wife gautamaḥ — Kṛpācārya yamau — the twin brothers Nakula and Sahadeva vṛkodaraḥ — Bhīma ca — and dhaumyaḥ — Dhaumya ca — and striyaḥ — also other ladies of the palace matsya-sutā-ādayaḥ — the daughter of a fisherman (Satyavatī, Bhīṣma’s stepmother) na — could not sehire — tolerate vimuhyantaḥ — almost fainting viraham — separation śārṅga-dhanvanaḥ — of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who bears a conch in His hand.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
subhadrā draupadī kuntī
subhadrā
the sister of Kṛṣṇa
draupadī
the wife of the Pāṇḍavas
kuntī
the mother of the Pāṇḍavas
virāṭa-tanayā tathā
virāṭa-tanayā
the daughter of Virāṭa (Uttarā)
tathā
also
gāndhārī dhṛtarāṣṭraś ca
gāndhārī
the mother of Duryodhana
dhṛtarāṣṭraḥ
the father of Duryodhana
ca
and
yuyutsur gautamo yamau
yuyutsuḥ
the son of Dhṛtarāṣṭra by his vaiśya wife
gautamaḥ
Kṛpācārya
yamau
the twin brothers Nakula and Sahadeva
vṛkodaraś ca dhaumyaś ca
vṛkodaraḥ
Bhīma
ca
and
dhaumyaḥ
Dhaumya
ca
and
striyo matsya-sutādayaḥ
striyaḥ
also other ladies of the palace
matsya-sutā-ādayaḥ
the daughter of a fisherman (Satyavatī, Bhīṣma’s stepmother)
na sehire vimuhyanto
na
could not
sehire
tolerate
vimuhyantaḥ
almost fainting
virahaṁ śārṅga-dhanvanaḥ
viraham
separation
śārṅga-dhanvanaḥ
of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who bears a conch in His hand.
At that time Subhadrā, Draupadī, Kuntī, Uttarā, Gāndhārī, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Yuyutsu, Kṛpācārya, Nakula, Sahadeva, Bhīmasena, Dhaumya and Satyavatī all nearly fainted because it was impossible for them to bear separation from Lord Kṛṣṇa.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is so attractive for the living beings, especially for the devotees, that it is impossible for them to tolerate separation. The conditioned soul under the spell of illusory energy forgets the Lord, otherwise he cannot. The feeling of such separation cannot be described, but it can simply be imagined by devotees only. After His separation from Vṛndāvana and the innocent rural cowherd boys, girls, ladies and others, they all felt shock throughout their lives, and the separation of Rādhārāṇī, the most beloved cowherd girl, is beyond expression. Once they met at Kurukṣetra during a solar eclipse, and the feeling which was expressed by them is heartrending. There is, of course, a difference in the qualities of the transcendental devotees of the Lord, but none of them who have ever contacted the Lord by direct communion or otherwise can leave Him for a moment. That is the attitude of the pure devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Subhadrā, Draupadī, Kuntī, Uttarā, Gāndhārī, Dhṛtarāṣtṛa, Yuyutsu, Kṛpācārya, Nakula, Sahadeva, Bhīma, Dhaumya, Satyavatī and other women, falling into confusion, could not bear separation from Kṛṣṇa
Commentary

Yuyutsu was Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s son by a vaiśya wife. Gautama is Kṛpa. Matsya-sutā refers to Uttarā. Her name is repeated because of the confusion arising on thinking of how her embryo was saved by Kṛṣṇa. Or it can refer to Satyavatī.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.11-12

↗
సత్సఙ్గాన్ముక్తదు:సఙ్గో హాతుం నోత్సహతే బుధ: । కీర్త్యమానం యశో యస్య సకృదాకర్ణ్య రోచనమ్ ॥ ౧౧ ॥ తస్మిన్న్యస్తధియ: పార్థా: సహేరన్ విరహం కథమ్ । దర్శనస్పర్శసంలాపశయనాసనభోజనై: ॥ ౧౨ ॥
sat-saṅgān mukta-duḥsaṅgo
[sat-sangaan mukta-duhsango]
hātuṁ notsahate budhaḥ
[haatum notsahate budhah]
kīrtyamānaṁ yaśo yasya
[keertyamaanam yasho yasya]
sakṛd ākarṇya rocanam
[sakrid aakarnya rochanam]
tasmin nyasta-dhiyaḥ pārthāḥ
[tasmin nyasta-dhiyah paarthaah]
saheran virahaṁ katham
[saheran viraham katham]
darśana-sparśa-saṁlāpa-
[darshana-sparsha-samlaapa-]
śayanāsana-bhojanaiḥ
[shayanaasana-bhojanaih]
sat-saṅgāt — by the association of pure devotees mukta-duḥsaṅgaḥ — freed from bad materialistic association hātum — to give up na utsahate — never attempts budhaḥ — one who has understood the Lord kīrtyamānam — glorifying yaśaḥ — fame yasya — whose sakṛt — once only ākarṇya — hearing only rocanam — pleasing tasmin — unto Him nyasta-dhiyaḥ — one who has given his mind unto Him pārthāḥ — the sons of Pṛthā saheran — can tolerate viraham — separation katham — how darśana — seeing face to face sparśa — touching saṁlāpa — conversing śayana — sleeping āsana — sitting bhojanaiḥ — dining together.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sat-saṅgān mukta-duḥsaṅgo
sat-saṅgāt
by the association of pure devotees
mukta-duḥsaṅgaḥ
freed from bad materialistic association
hātuṁ notsahate budhaḥ
hātum
to give up
kīrtyamānaṁ yaśo yasya
na utsahate
never attempts
budhaḥ
one who has understood the Lord
kīrtyamānam
glorifying
yaśaḥ
fame
yasya
whose
sakṛd ākarṇya rocanam
sakṛt
once only
ākarṇya
hearing only
rocanam
pleasing
tasmin nyasta-dhiyaḥ pārthāḥ
tasmin
unto Him
nyasta-dhiyaḥ
one who has given his mind unto Him
pārthāḥ
the sons of Pṛthā
saheran virahaṁ katham
saheran
can tolerate
viraham
separation
katham
how
darśana-sparśa-saṁlāpa-
darśana
seeing face to face
sparśa
touching
saṁlāpa
conversing
śayanāsana-bhojanaiḥ
śayana
sleeping
āsana
sitting
bhojanaiḥ
dining together.
The intelligent, who have understood the Supreme Lord in association with pure devotees and have become freed from bad materialistic association, can never avoid hearing the glories of the Lord, even though they have heard them only once. How then could the Pāṇḍavas tolerate His separation, for they had been intimately associated with His person, seeing Him face to face, touching Him, conversing with Him, and sleeping, sitting and dining with Him?

The living being’s constitutional position is one of serving a superior. He is obliged to serve by force the dictates of illusory material energy in different phases of sense gratification. And in serving the senses he is never tired. Even though he may be tired, the illusory energy perpetually forces him to do so without being satisfied. There is no end to such sense gratificatory business, and the conditioned soul becomes entangled in such servitude without hope of release. The release is only effected by association with pure devotees. By such association one is gradually promoted to his transcendental consciousness. Thus he can know that his eternal position is to render service unto the Lord and not to the perverted senses in the capacity of lust, anger, desire to lord it over, etc. Material society, friendship and love are all different phases of lust. Home, country, family, society, wealth and all sorts of corollaries are all causes of bondage in the material world, where the threefold miseries of life are concomitant factors. By associating with pure devotees and by hearing them submissively, attachment for material enjoyment becomes slackened, and attraction for hearing about the transcendental activities of the Lord becomes prominent. Once they are, they will go on progressively without stoppage, like fire in gunpowder. It is said that Hari, the Personality of Godhead, is so transcendentally attractive that even those who are self-satisfied by self-realization and are factually liberated from all material bondage also become devotees of the Lord. Under the circumstances it is easily understood what must have been the position of the Pāṇḍavas, who were constant companions of the Lord. They could not even think of separation from Śrī Kṛṣṇa, since the attraction was more intense for them because of continuous personal contact. His remembrance by His form, quality, name, fame, pastimes, etc., is also attractive for the pure devotee, so much so that he forgets all forms, quality, name, fame and activities of the mundane world, and due to his mature association with pure devotees he is not out of contact with the Lord for a moment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The intelligent person, freed of bad association by good association, cannot give up the pleasing qualities of Kṛṣṇa which have been recited, even if he hears them once. How could the Pāṇḍavas, who were absorbed in him while eating, sitting, sleeping, talking, touching and seeing, tolerate separation from him?
Commentary

The two verses are connected. How could the Pāṇḍavas tolerate separation from the Lord, whose glories the intelligent person cannot give up, even if he hears them only once? Rocanam means pleasing. The intelligent person is described as he who has given up bad association by taking good association. Without the association of devotees, bad association which causes attachment, hatred and other bad qualities will not disappear. Without the disappearance of bad qualities, a person will not become strongly attached to the pleasing qualities of the Lord. This is implied in the sentence. The Pāṇḍavas were absorbed in Kṛṣṇa while seeing, touching etc.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.13

↗
సర్వే తేఽనిమిషైరక్షైస్తమనుద్రుతచేతస: । వీక్షన్త: స్‍నేహసమ్బద్ధా విచేలుస్తత్ర తత్ర హ ॥ ౧౩ ॥
sarve te ’nimiṣair akṣais
[sarve te ’nimishair akshais]
tam anu druta-cetasaḥ
[tam anu druta-chetasah]
vīkṣantaḥ sneha-sambaddhā
[veekshantah sneha-sambaddhaa]
vicelus tatra tatra ha
[vichelus tatra tatra ha]
sarve — all te — they animiṣaiḥ — without twinkling of the eyes akṣaiḥ — by the eye tam anu — after Him druta-cetasaḥ — melted heart vīkṣantaḥ — looking upon Him sneha-sambaddhāḥ — bound by pure affection viceluḥ — began to move tatra tatra — here and there ha — so they did.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarve te ’nimiṣair akṣais
sarve
all
te
they
tam anu druta-cetasaḥ
animiṣaiḥ
without twinkling of the eyes
akṣaiḥ
by the eye
tam anu
after Him
druta-cetasaḥ
melted heart
vīkṣantaḥ sneha-sambaddhā
vīkṣantaḥ
looking upon Him
sneha-sambaddhāḥ
bound by pure affection
vicelus tatra tatra ha
viceluḥ
began to move
tatra tatra
here and there
ha
so they did.
All their hearts were melting for Him on the pot of attraction. They looked at Him without blinking their eyes, and they moved hither and thither in perplexity.

Kṛṣṇa is naturally attractive for all living beings because He is the chief eternal amongst all eternals. He alone is the maintainer of the many eternals. This is stated in the Kaṭha Upaniṣad, and thus one can obtain permanent peace and prosperity by revival of one’s eternal relation with Him, now forgotten under the spell of māyā, the illusory energy of the Lord. Once this relation is slightly revived, the conditioned soul at once becomes freed from the illusion of material energy and becomes mad after the association of the Lord. This association is made possible not only by personal contact with the Lord, but also by association with His name, fame, form and quality. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam trains the conditioned soul to this stage of perfection by submissive hearing from the pure devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Looking upon him with unblinking eyes, their hearts melted, they became filled with affection, and moved wherever he moved.
Commentary

They looked at him with unblinking eyes. After looking, their hearts melted. Then they became filled with affection. Then they followed him wherever he went.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.14

↗
న్యరున్ధన్నుద్గలద్బాష్పమౌత్కణ్ఠ్యాద్దేవకీసుతే । నిర్యాత్యగారాన్నోఽభద్రమితి స్యాద్బ‍ాన్ధవస్త్రియ: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
nyarundhann udgalad bāṣpam
[nyarundhann udgalad baashpam]
autkaṇṭhyād devakī-sute
[autkanthyaad devakee-sute]
niryāty agārān no ’bhadram
[niryaaty agaaraan no ’bhadram]
iti syād bāndhava-striyaḥ
[iti syaad baandhava-striyah]
nyarundhan — checking with great difficulty udgalat — overflowing bāṣpam — tears autkaṇṭhyāt — because of great anxiety devakī-sute — unto the son of Devakī niryāti — having come out agārāt — from the palace naḥ — not abhadram — inauspiciousness iti — thus syāt — may happen bāndhava — relative striyaḥ — ladies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nyarundhann udgalad bāṣpam
nyarundhan
checking with great difficulty
udgalat
overflowing
bāṣpam
tears
autkaṇṭhyād devakī-sute
autkaṇṭhyāt
because of great anxiety
devakī-sute
unto the son of Devakī
niryāty agārān no ’bhadram
niryāti
having come out
agārāt
from the palace
naḥ
not
abhadram
inauspiciousness
iti syād bāndhava-striyaḥ
iti
thus
syāt
may happen
bāndhava
relative
striyaḥ
ladies.
The female relatives, whose eyes were flooded with tears out of anxiety for Kṛṣṇa, came out of the palace. They could stop their tears only with great difficulty. They feared that tears would cause misfortune at the time of departure.

There were hundreds of ladies in the palace of Hastināpura. All of them were affectionate to Kṛṣṇa. All of them were relatives also. When they saw that Kṛṣṇa was going away from the palace for His native place, they were very anxious for Him, and as usual tears began to roll down their cheeks. They thought, at the same time, that tears at that moment might be a cause of misfortune for Kṛṣṇa; therefore they wanted to check them. This was very difficult for them because the tears could not be checked. Therefore, they smeared their tears in their eyes, and their hearts throbbed. Therefore ladies who were the wives and daughters-in-law of those who died in the battlefield never came in direct contact with Kṛṣṇa. But all of them heard of Him and His great activities, and thus they thought of Him, talked of Him — His name, fame, etc. — and became affectionate also, like those who were in direct contact. Therefore directly or indirectly anyone who thinks of Kṛṣṇa, talks of Kṛṣṇa or worships Kṛṣṇa becomes attached to Him. Because Kṛṣṇa is absolute, there is no difference between His name, form, quality, etc. Our intimate relation with Kṛṣṇa can be confidentially revived by our talking of, hearing of, or remembering Him. It is so done due to spiritual potency.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Kṛṣṇa left the house all the wives of his friends blocked the tears flowing from their eyes because of their attachment to him, thinking “There should be no inauspiciousness for him.”
Commentary

When he left the house, because of attachment to him they stopped their flowing tears, because they thought there should be nothing inauspicious for him. Udgalad is a present participle with the prefix ud. With great effort they stopped the tears, but the tears still flowed. They hid those tears with the edges of their garments in order to prevent any inauspiciousness from being seen.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.15

↗
మృదఙ్గశఙ్ఖభేర్యశ్చ వీణాపణవగోముఖా: । ధున్ధుర్యానకఘణ్టాద్యా నేదుర్దున్దుభయస్తథా ॥ ౧౫ ॥
mṛdaṅga-śaṅkha-bheryaś ca
[mridanga-shankha-bheryash cha]
vīṇā-paṇava-gomukhāḥ
[veenaa-panava-gomukhaah]
dhundhury-ānaka-ghaṇṭādyā
[dhundhury-aanaka-ghantaadyaa]
nedur dundubhayas tathā
[nedur dundubhayas tathaa]
mṛdaṅga — sweet-sounding drum śaṅkha — conchshell bheryaḥ — brass band ca — and vīṇā — string band paṇava — a kind of flute gomukhāḥ — another flute dhundhurī — another drum ānaka — kettle ghaṇṭā — bell ādyāḥ — others neduḥ — sounded dundubhayaḥ — other different types of drums tathā — at that time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mṛdaṅga-śaṅkha-bheryaś ca
mṛdaṅga
sweet-sounding drum
śaṅkha
conchshell
bheryaḥ
brass band
ca
and
vīṇā-paṇava-gomukhāḥ
vīṇā
string band
paṇava
a kind of flute
gomukhāḥ
another flute
dhundhury-ānaka-ghaṇṭādyā
dhundhurī
another drum
ānaka
kettle
ghaṇṭā
bell
ādyāḥ
others
nedur dundubhayas tathā
neduḥ
sounded
dundubhayaḥ
other different types of drums
tathā
at that time.
While the Lord was departing from the palace of Hastināpura, different types of drums — like the mṛdaṅga, dhola, nagra, dhundhurī and dundubhi — and flutes of different types, the vīṇā, gomukha and bherī, all sounded together to show Him honor.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Mṛdaṅgas, conches, bheris, vīṇas, paṇavas, gomukhas, dhundhuris, ānakas, bells and dundubhis began to sound.
Commentary

These are various instruments.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.16

↗
ప్రాసాదశిఖరారూఢా: కురునార్యో దిద‍ృక్షయా । వవృషు: కుసుమై: కృష్ణం ప్రేమవ్రీడాస్మితేక్షణా: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
prāsāda-śikharārūḍhāḥ
[praasaada-shikharaaroodhaah]
kuru-nāryo didṛkṣayā
[kuru-naaryo didrikshayaa]
vavṛṣuḥ kusumaiḥ kṛṣṇaṁ
[vavrishuh kusumaih krishnam]
prema-vrīḍā-smitekṣaṇāḥ
[prema-vreedaa-smitekshanaah]
prāsāda — palace śikhara — the roof ārūḍhāḥ — ascending kuru-nāryaḥ — the ladies of the Kuru royalty didṛkṣayā — seeing vavṛṣuḥ — showered kusumaiḥ — by flowers kṛṣṇam — upon Lord Kṛṣṇa prema — out of affection and love vrīḍā-smita-īkṣaṇāḥ — glancing with shy smiles.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prāsāda-śikharārūḍhāḥ
prāsāda
palace
śikhara
the roof
ārūḍhāḥ
ascending
kuru-nāryo didṛkṣayā
kuru-nāryaḥ
the ladies of the Kuru royalty
didṛkṣayā
seeing
vavṛṣuḥ kusumaiḥ kṛṣṇaṁ
vavṛṣuḥ
showered
kusumaiḥ
by flowers
kṛṣṇam
upon Lord Kṛṣṇa
prema-vrīḍā-smitekṣaṇāḥ
prema
out of affection and love
vrīḍā-smita-īkṣaṇāḥ
glancing with shy smiles.
Out of a loving desire to see the Lord, the royal ladies of the Kurus got up on top of the palace, and smiling with affection and shyness, they showered flowers upon the Lord.

Shyness is a particular extra-natural beauty of the fair sex, and it commands respect from the opposite sex. This custom was observed even during the days of the Mahābhārata, i.e., more than five thousand years ago. It is only the less intelligent persons not well versed in the history of the world who say that observance of separation of female from male is an introduction of the Mohammedan period in India. This incident from the Mahābhārata period proves definitely that the ladies of the palace observed strict pardā (restricted association with men), and instead of coming down in the open air where Lord Kṛṣṇa and others were assembled, the ladies of the palace went up on the top of the palace and from there paid their respects to Lord Kṛṣṇa by showers of flowers. It is definitely stated here that the ladies were smiling there on the top of the palace, checked by shyness. This shyness is a gift of nature to the fair sex, and it enhances their beauty and prestige, even if they are of a less important family or even if they are less attractive. We have practical experience of this fact. A sweeper woman commanded the respect of many respectable gentlemen simply by manifesting a lady’s shyness. Half-naked ladies in the street do not command any respect, but a shy sweeper’s wife commands respect from all.

Human civilization, as conceived of by the sages of India, is to help one free himself from the clutches of illusion. The material beauty of a woman is an illusion because actually the body is made of earth, water, fire, air, etc. But because there is the association of the living spark with matter, it appears to be beautiful. No one is attracted by an earthen doll, even if it is most perfectly prepared to attract the attention of others. The dead body has no beauty because no one will accept the dead body of a so-called beautiful woman. Therefore, the conclusion is that the spirit spark is beautiful, and because of the soul’s beauty one is attracted by the beauty of the outward body. The Vedic wisdom, therefore, forbids us to be attracted by false beauty. But because we are now in the darkness of ignorance, the Vedic civilization allows very restricted mixing of woman and man. They say that the woman is considered to be the fire, and the man is considered to be the butter. The butter must melt in association with fire, and therefore they may be brought together only when it is necessary. And shyness is a check to the unrestricted mixing. It is nature’s gift, and it must be utilized.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Kuru women, climbing on the roofs of the palace to see, glancing at him to convey smiles, shyness and love, showered Kṛṣṇa with flowers.
Commentary

Kusumaiḥ should actually be in the accusative case kusumāni. They conveyed through their glances smiles, shyness and love.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.17

↗
సితాతపత్రం జగ్రాహ ముక్తాదామవిభూషితమ్ । రత్నదణ్డం గుడాకేశ: ప్రియ: ప్రియతమస్య హ ॥ ౧౭ ॥
sitātapatraṁ jagrāha
[sitaatapatram jagraaha]
muktādāma-vibhūṣitam
[muktaadaama-vibhooshitam]
ratna-daṇḍaṁ guḍākeśaḥ
[ratna-dandam gudaakeshah]
priyaḥ priyatamasya ha
[priyah priyatamasya ha]
sita-ātapatram — soothing umbrella jagrāha — took up muktā-dāma — decorated with laces and pearls vibhūṣitam — embroidered ratna-daṇḍam — with a handle of jewels guḍākeśaḥ — Arjuna, the expert warrior, or one who has conquered sleep priyaḥ — most beloved priyatamasya — of the most beloved ha — so he did.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sitātapatraṁ jagrāha
sita-ātapatram
soothing umbrella
jagrāha
took up
muktādāma-vibhūṣitam
muktā-dāma
decorated with laces and pearls
vibhūṣitam
embroidered
ratna-daṇḍaṁ guḍākeśaḥ
ratna-daṇḍam
with a handle of jewels
guḍākeśaḥ
Arjuna, the expert warrior, or one who has conquered sleep
priyaḥ priyatamasya ha
priyaḥ
most beloved
priyatamasya
of the most beloved
ha
so he did.
At that time Arjuna, the great warrior and conqueror of sleep, who is the intimate friend of the most beloved Supreme Lord, took up an umbrella which had a handle of jewels and was embroidered with lace and pearls.

Gold, jewels, pearls and valuable stones were used in the luxurious royal ceremonies. They are all nature’s gifts and are produced by the hills, oceans, etc., by the order of the Lord, when man does not waste his valuable time in producing unwanted things in the name of necessities. By so-called development of industrial enterprises, they are now using pots of gutta-percha instead of metals like gold, silver, brass and copper. They are using margarine instead of purified butter, and one fourth of the city population has no shelter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Arjuna, conqueror of sleep and dear to the Lord, held a white umbrella decorated with pearls and a jewel-studded handle for his dearest friend.
Commentary

Gudākeśaḥ means Arjuna, who had conquered sleep.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.18

↗
ఉద్ధవ: సాత్యకిశ్చైవ వ్యజనే పరమాద్భుతే । వికీర్యమాణ: కుసుమై రేజే మధుపతి: పథి ॥ ౧౮ ॥
uddhavaḥ sātyakiś caiva
[uddhavah saatyakish chaiva]
vyajane paramādbhute
[vyajane paramaadbhute]
vikīryamāṇaḥ kusumai
[vikeeryamaanah kusumai]
reje madhu-patiḥ pathi
[reje madhu-patih pathi]
uddhavaḥ — a cousin-brother of Kṛṣṇa’s sātyakiḥ — His driver ca — and eva — certainly vyajane — engaged in fanning parama-adbhute — decorative vikīryamāṇaḥ — seated on scattered kusumaiḥ — flowers all around reje — commanded madhu-patiḥ — the master of Madhu (Kṛṣṇa) pathi — on the road.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uddhavaḥ sātyakiś caiva
uddhavaḥ
a cousin-brother of Kṛṣṇa’s
sātyakiḥ
His driver
ca
and
eva
certainly
vyajane paramādbhute
vyajane
engaged in fanning
parama-adbhute
decorative
vikīryamāṇaḥ kusumai
vikīryamāṇaḥ
seated on scattered
kusumaiḥ
flowers all around
reje madhu-patiḥ pathi
reje
commanded
madhu-patiḥ
the master of Madhu (Kṛṣṇa)
pathi
on the road.
Uddhava and Sātyaki began to fan the Lord with decorated fans, and the Lord, as the master of Madhu, seated on scattered flowers, commanded them along the road.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Uddhava and Sātyaki held astonishing fans. The lord of the Madhus appeared splendid on the road when sprinkled with flowers.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.19

↗
అశ్రూయన్తాశిష: సత్యాస్తత్ర తత్ర ద్విజేరితా: । నానురూపానురూపాశ్చ నిర్గుణస్య గుణాత్మన: ॥ ౧౯ ॥
aśrūyantāśiṣaḥ satyās
[ashrooyantaashishah satyaas]
tatra tatra dvijeritāḥ
[tatra tatra dvijeritaah]
nānurūpānurūpāś ca
[naanuroopaanuroopaash cha]
nirguṇasya guṇātmanaḥ
[nirgunasya gunaatmanah]
aśrūyanta — being heard āśiṣaḥ — benediction satyāḥ — all truths tatra — here tatra — there dvija-īritāḥ — sounded by learned brāhmaṇas na — not anurūpa — befitting anurūpāḥ — fitting ca — also nirguṇasya — of the Absolute guṇa-ātmanaḥ — playing the role of a human being.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aśrūyantāśiṣaḥ satyās
aśrūyanta
being heard
āśiṣaḥ
benediction
satyāḥ
all truths
tatra tatra dvijeritāḥ
tatra
here
tatra
there
dvija-īritāḥ
sounded by learned brāhmaṇas
nānurūpānurūpāś ca
na
not
anurūpa
befitting
anurūpāḥ
fitting
ca
also
nirguṇasya guṇātmanaḥ
nirguṇasya
of the Absolute
guṇa-ātmanaḥ
playing the role of a human being.
It was being heard here and there that the benedictions being paid to Kṛṣṇa were neither befitting nor unbefitting because they were all for the Absolute, who was now playing the part of a human being.

At places there were sounds of Vedic benediction aiming at the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. The benedictions were fitting in the sense that the Lord was playing the part of a human being, as if a cousin of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, but they were also unfitting because the Lord is absolute and has nothing to do with any kind of material relativities. He is nirguṇa, or there are no material qualities in Him, but He is full of transcendental qualities. In the transcendental world there is nothing contradictory, whereas in the relative world everything has its opposite. In the relative world white is the opposite conception of black, but in the transcendental world there is no distinction between white and black. Therefore the sounds of benedictions uttered by the learned brāhmaṇas here and there appear to be contradictory in relation with the Absolute Person, but when they are applied to the Absolute Person they lose all contradiction and become transcendental. One example may clear this idea. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is sometimes described as a thief. He is very famous amongst His pure devotees as the Mākhana-cora. He used to steal butter from the houses of neighbors at Vṛndāvana in His early age. Since then He is famous as a thief. But in spite of His being famous as a thief, He is worshiped as a thief, whereas in the mundane world a thief is punished and is never praised. Since He is the Absolute Personality of Godhead, everything is applicable to Him, and still in spite of all contradictions He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
On the road, he heard the factual blessings uttered by brāhmaṇas, which were not appropriate for the Lord who is beyond all qualities of this world, but which were appropriate for the Lord who has spiritual qualities relished by his devotees.
Commentary

The blessings are described as satya or true because Kṛṣṇa never deviates from those descriptions, but the blessings were both inappropriate (nānurūpāḥ) and appropriate (anurūpāḥ). The sandhi is poetic license. From the point of view of the Lord’s powers, blessings such as “Be happy!” are inappropriate for one who is without material qualities (nirguṇasya) and full of spiritual bliss. From the point of view of sweetness, the same blessings are appropriate for the Lord who has spiritual qualities such as being controlled by the devotee’s prema and being devoted to brāhmaṇas (guṇātmaṇaḥ). The words are appropriate because the Lord’s words in reply “I am always happy with your blessings” which describe his qualities should not be false. As well since Kṛṣṇa is both the viṣaya and āśraya of dāsya, sakhya, vātsalya and mādhurya rasas, he is actually filled with spiritual qualities of happiness and distress arising from meeting and separating from his devotees.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.20

↗
అన్యోన్యమాసీత్సఞ్జల్ప ఉత్తమశ్లోకచేతసామ్ । కౌరవేన్ద్రపురస్త్రీణాం సర్వశ్రుతిమనోహర: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
anyonyam āsīt saṣjalpa
[anyonyam aaseet sashjalpa]
uttama-śloka-cetasām
[uttama-shloka-chetasaam]
kauravendra-pura-strīṇāṁ
[kauravendra-pura-streenaam]
sarva-śruti-mano-haraḥ
[sarva-shruti-mano-harah]
anyonyam — among each other āsīt — there was saṣjalpaḥ — talking uttama-śloka — the Supreme, who is praised by selected poetry cetasām — of those whose hearts are absorbed in that way kaurava-indra — the king of the Kurus pura — capital strīṇām — all the ladies sarva — all śruti — the Vedas manaḥ-haraḥ — attractive to the mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anyonyam āsīt saṣjalpa
anyonyam
among each other
āsīt
there was
saṣjalpaḥ
talking
uttama-śloka-cetasām
uttama-śloka
the Supreme, who is praised by selected poetry
cetasām
of those whose hearts are absorbed in that way
kauravendra-pura-strīṇāṁ
kaurava-indra
the king of the Kurus
pura
capital
strīṇām
all the ladies
sarva-śruti-mano-haraḥ
sarva
all
śruti
the Vedas
manaḥ-haraḥ
attractive to the mind.
Absorbed in the thought of the transcendental qualities of the Lord, who is sung in select poetry, the ladies on the roofs of all the houses of Hastināpura began to talk of Him. This talk was more attractive than the hymns of the Vedas.

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that in all the Vedic literatures the goal is the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Factually the glories of the Lord are depicted in such literature as the Vedas, Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata. And in the Bhāgavatam they are specifically mentioned in respect to the Supreme Lord. Therefore, while the ladies on the tops of the houses in the capital of the kings of the Kuru dynasty were talking about the Lord, their talk was more pleasing than the Vedic hymns. Anything sung in the praise of the Lord is śruti-mantra. There are songs of Ṭhākura Narottama dāsa, one of the ācāryas in the Gauḍīya sampradāya, composed in simple Bengali language. But Ṭhākura Viśvanātha Cakravartī, another very learned ācārya of the same sampradāya, has approved the songs by Ṭhākura Narottama dāsa to be as good as Vedic mantras. And this is so because of the subject matter. The language is immaterial, but the subject matter is important. The ladies, who were all absorbed in the thought and actions of the Lord, developed the consciousness of Vedic wisdom by the grace of the Lord. And therefore although such ladies might not have been very learned scholars in Sanskrit or otherwise, still whatever they spoke was more attractive than the Vedic hymns. The Vedic hymns in the Upaniṣads are sometimes indirectly directed to the Supreme Lord. But the talks of the ladies were directly spoken of the Lord, and thus they were more pleasing to the heart. The ladies’ talks appeared to be more valuable than the learned brāhmaṇas ’ benedictions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Kuru women, fully absorbed in Kṛṣṇa, conversed about him with words attractive to all ears and minds.
Commentary

Their conversation was attractive to all ears and minds (sarva-śruti-mano-haraḥ). Another meaning is “their conversation was attractive to all the śruti scriptures.” Since their words were the embodiment of the Upaniṣads, the śrutis were happy with the conversation.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.21

↗
స వై కిలాయం పురుష: పురాతనో య ఏక ఆసీదవిశేష ఆత్మని । అగ్రే గుణేభ్యో జగదాత్మనీశ్వరే నిమీలితాత్మన్నిశి సుప్తశక్తిషు ॥ ౨౧ ॥
sa vai kilāyaṁ puruṣaḥ purātano
[sa vai kilaayam purushah puraatano]
ya eka āsīd aviśeṣa ātmani
[ya eka aaseed avishesha aatmani]
agre guṇebhyo jagad-ātmanīśvare
[agre gunebhyo jagad-aatmaneeshvare]
nimīlitātman niśi supta-śaktiṣu
[nimeelitaatman nishi supta-shaktishu]
saḥ — He (Kṛṣṇa) vai — as I remember kila — definitely ayam — this puruṣaḥ — Personality of Godhead purātanaḥ — the original yaḥ — who ekaḥ — only one āsīt — existed aviśeṣaḥ — materially unmanifested ātmani — own self agre — before creation guṇebhyaḥ — of the modes of nature jagat-ātmani — unto the Supersoul īśvare — unto the Supreme Lord nimīlita — merged into ātman — the living entity niśi supta — inactive at night śaktiṣu — of the energies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vai kilāyaṁ puruṣaḥ purātano
saḥ
He (Kṛṣṇa)
vai
as I remember
kila
definitely
ayam
this
puruṣaḥ
Personality of Godhead
purātanaḥ
the original
ya eka āsīd aviśeṣa ātmani
yaḥ
who
ekaḥ
only one
āsīt
existed
aviśeṣaḥ
materially unmanifested
ātmani
own self
agre guṇebhyo jagad-ātmanīśvare
agre
before creation
guṇebhyaḥ
of the modes of nature
jagat-ātmani
unto the Supersoul
īśvare
unto the Supreme Lord
nimīlitātman niśi supta-śaktiṣu
nimīlita
merged into
ātman
the living entity
niśi supta
inactive at night
śaktiṣu
of the energies.
They said: Here He is, the original Personality of Godhead as we definitely remember Him. He alone existed before the manifested creation of the modes of nature, and in Him only, because He is the Supreme Lord, all living beings merge, as if sleeping at night, their energy suspended.

There are two types of dissolution of the manifested cosmos. At the end of every 4,320,000,000 solar years, when Brahmā, the lord of one particular universe, goes to sleep, there is one annihilation. And at the end of Lord Brahmā’s life, which takes place at the end of Brahmā’s one hundred years of age, in our calculation at the end of 8,640,000,000 × 30 × 12 × 100 solar years, there is complete annihilation of the entire universe, and in both the periods both the material energy called the mahat-tattva and the marginal energy called jīva-tattva merge in the person of the Supreme Lord. The living beings remain asleep within the body of the Lord until there is another creation of the material world, and that is the way of the creation, maintenance and annihilation of the material manifestation.

The material creation is effected by the interaction of the three modes of material nature set in action by the Lord, and therefore it is said here that the Lord existed before the modes of material nature were set in motion. In the śruti-mantra it is said that only Viṣṇu, the Supreme Lord, existed before the creation, and there was no Brahmā, Śiva or other demigods. Viṣṇu means the Mahā-Viṣṇu, who is lying on the Causal Ocean. By His breathing only all the universes are generated in seeds and gradually develop into gigantic forms with innumerable planets within each and every universe. The seeds of universes develop into gigantic forms in the way seeds of a banyan tree develop into numberless banyan trees.

This Mahā-Viṣṇu is the plenary portion of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is mentioned in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.48) as follows:

“Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto the original Personality of Godhead Govinda, whose plenary portion is the Mahā-Viṣṇu. All the Brahmās, the heads of the universes, live only for the period of His exhaling, after the universes are generated from the pores of His transcendental body.”

Thus Govinda, or Lord Kṛṣṇa, is the cause of Mahā-Viṣṇu also. The ladies talking about this Vedic truth must have heard it from authoritative sources. An authoritative source is the only means of knowing about transcendental subject matter definitely. There is no alternative.

The merging of the living beings into the body of Mahā-Viṣṇu takes place automatically at the end of Brahmā’s one hundred years. But that does not mean that the individual living being loses his identity. The identity is there, and as soon as there is another creation by the supreme will of the Lord, all the sleeping, inactive living beings are again let loose to begin their activities in the continuation of past different spheres of life. It is called suptotthita-nyāya, or awakening from sleep and again engaging in one’s respective continuous duty. When a man is asleep at night, he forgets himself, what he is, what his duty is and everything of his waking state. But as soon as he awakens from slumber, he remembers all that he has to do and thus engages himself again in his prescribed activities. The living beings also remain merged in the body of Mahā-Viṣṇu during the period of annihilation, but as soon as there is another creation they arise to take up their unfinished work. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.18-19).

The Lord existed before the creative energy was set in action. The Lord is not a product of the material energy. His body is completely spiritual, and there is no difference between His body and Himself. Before creation the Lord remained in His abode, which is absolute and one.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa is certainly that ancient puruṣa who alone existed without expansions before the agitation of the guṇas and during devastation, when all the jīvas along with their identities were merged within him, the soul of prakṛti..
Commentary

First they spoke with reverence in śānta-rati He is the ancient puruṣa, without expansions (aviśeṣaḥ).Or aviśeṣaḥ can mean that he is without any comparison, since he only existed in the beginning. This we have heard from Vyāsa. Certainly (vai) Kṛṣṇa is that puruṣa. They point at him with their forefinger when they say this. He is the one who existed before all else, before the disturbance of the guṇas, during the devastation (niśi), when all the jīvas (jagad-ātmani) were merged (nimīlitātman) in the Lord (īśvare), who is the soul of prakṛti (ātmani). Jagad-ātmani is in singular form because it represents a class.

“At the time of devastation the destruction is not complete because the ignorance of the jīvas has not been destroyed.” Therefore it is said at that time there is destruction of the identification of the jīvas (sputa-śaktiṣu). This is an accessory to the jīvas merging.

Or another meaning of the sentence is as follows. Kṛṣṇa is that ancient puruṣa who before the agitation of the guṇas at the time of devastation, existed in his svarūpa all alone (ātmani aviśeṣe). He who is now performing various pastimes with his associates was at that time alone in his svarūpa. He alone existed and no others. Not even Brahmā existed. The rest of the verse would be the same in meaning.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.22

↗
స ఏవ భూయో నిజవీర్యచోదితాం స్వజీవమాయాం ప్రకృతిం సిసృక్షతీమ్ । అనామరూపాత్మని రూపనామనీ విధిత్సమానోఽనుససార శాస్త్రకృత్ ॥ ౨౨ ॥
sa eva bhūyo nija-vīrya-coditāṁ
[sa eva bhooyo nija-veerya-choditaam]
sva-jīva-māyāṁ prakṛtiṁ sisṛkṣatīm
[sva-jeeva-maayaam prakritim sisrikshateem]
anāma-rūpātmani rūpa-nāmanī
[anaama-roopaatmani roopa-naamanee]
vidhitsamāno ’nusasāra śāstra-kṛt
[vidhitsamaano ’nusasaara shaastra-krit]
saḥ — He eva — thus bhūyaḥ — again nija — own personal vīrya — potency coditām — performance of sva — own jīva — living being māyām — external energy prakṛtim — unto material nature sisṛkṣatīm — while re-creating anāma — without mundane designation rūpa-ātmani — forms of the soul rūpa-nāmanī — forms and names vidhitsamānaḥ — desiring to award anusasāra — entrusted śāstra-kṛt — the compiler of revealed scripture.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eva bhūyo nija-vīrya-coditāṁ
saḥ
He
eva
thus
bhūyaḥ
again
nija
own personal
vīrya
potency
coditām
performance of
sva-jīva-māyāṁ prakṛtiṁ sisṛkṣatīm
sva
own
jīva
living being
māyām
external energy
prakṛtim
unto material nature
sisṛkṣatīm
while re-creating
anāma-rūpātmani rūpa-nāmanī
anāma
without mundane designation
rūpa-ātmani
forms of the soul
rūpa-nāmanī
forms and names
vidhitsamāno ’nusasāra śāstra-kṛt
vidhitsamānaḥ
desiring to award
anusasāra
entrusted
śāstra-kṛt
the compiler of revealed scripture.
The Personality of Godhead, again desiring to give names and forms to His parts and parcels, the living entities, placed them under the guidance of material nature. By His own potency, material nature is empowered to re-create.

The living entities are parts and parcels of the Lord. They are of two varieties, namely nitya-mukta and nitya-baddha. The nitya-muktas are eternally liberated souls, and they are eternally engaged in the reciprocation of transcendental loving service with the Lord in His eternal abode beyond the manifested mundane creations. But the nitya-baddha, or eternally conditioned souls, are entrusted to His external energy, māyā, for rectification of their rebellious attitude toward the supreme father. Nitya-baddhas are eternally forgetful of their relation with the Lord as parts and parcels. They are bewildered by the illusory energy as products of matter, and thus they are very busy in making plans in the material world for becoming happy. They go on merrily with plans, but by the will of the Lord both the plan-makers and the plans are annihilated at the end of a certain period, as above mentioned. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.7) as follows: “O son of Kuntī, at the end of the millennium all the living entities merge into My nature, and again when the time of creation is ripe, I begin creation by the agency of My external energy.”

The word bhūyaḥ indicates “again and again” — that is to say, the process of creation, maintenance and annihilation is going on perpetually by the external energy of the Lord. He is the cause of everything. But the living beings, who are constitutionally part and parcel of the Lord and are forgetful of the sweet relation, are given a chance again and again to get rid of the clutches of the external energy. And to revive his (the living being’s) consciousness, the revealed scriptures are also created by the Lord. Vedic literatures are the guiding directions for the conditioned souls so they can get free from the repetition of creation and annihilation of the material world and the material body.

The Lord says in the Bhagavad-gītā, “This created world and material energy are under My control. Under the influence of prakṛti, automatically they are created again and again, and this is done by Me through the agency of My external energy.”

Actually the spiritual-spark living entities have no material names or forms. But in order to fulfill their desire to lord it over the material energy of material forms and names, they are given a chance for such false enjoyment, and at the same time they are given a chance to understand the real position through the revealed scriptures. The foolish and forgetful living being is always busy with false forms and false names. Modern nationalism is the culmination of such false names and false forms. Men are mad after false name and form. The form of body obtained under certain conditions is taken up as factual, and the name also taken bewilders the conditioned soul into misusing the energy in the name of so many “isms.” The scriptures, however, supply the clue for understanding the real position, but men are reluctant to take lessons from the scriptures created by the Lord for different places and times. For example, the Bhagavad-gītā is the guiding principle for all human beings, but by the spell of material energy they do not take care to carry out the programs of life in terms of the Bhagavad-gītā. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the postgraduate study of knowledge for one who has thoroughly understood the principles of the Bhagavad-gītā. Unfortunately people have no taste for them, and therefore they are under the clutches of māyā for repetition of birth and death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, after manifesting the scriptures, and desiring to make names and forms for the jīvas, then followed prakṛti, who desired to create the universe, but who moves only by his power, and by his will alone bewilders the jīvas.
Commentary

Having spoken of the Lord’s situation during the devastation and before the creation, with his unfailing form, qualities and pastimes, they describe another pastime involving his expansion at the beginning of creation, in order to describe the Lord’s eternal condition even at that time. Mahā-viṣṇu, manifesting the Vedas at the first moment of his breathing (śāstra-kṛt), followed prakṛti. “But if he follows prakṛti, that is a fault, because that shows he is dependent on prakṛti.” No. Prakṛti is instigated by his power (nija-vīyra-coditām). Engaged in activity under his control, prakṛti is the controller or bewilderer of the jīva (jīva-māyām) who are also his energies (sva). Why does he follow prakṛti? He follows her because he desires to make names and forms such as devatās, humans and animals, for the jīvas with no names and forms, by creating gross and subtle bodies and imposing them on the jīvas. In order to accomplish performance of karma, jṣāna, yoga and bhakti, the Lord created the scriptures before following prakṛti.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.23

↗
స వా అయం యత్పదమత్ర సూరయో జితేన్ద్రియా నిర్జితమాతరిశ్వన: । పశ్యన్తి భక్త్యుత్కలితామలాత్మనా నన్వేష సత్త్వం పరిమార్ష్టుమర్హతి ॥ ౨౩ ॥
sa vā ayaṁ yat padam atra sūrayo
[sa vaa ayam yat padam atra soorayo]
jitendriyā nirjita-mātariśvanaḥ
[jitendriyaa nirjita-maatarishvanah]
paśyanti bhakty-utkalitāmalātmanā
[pashyanti bhakty-utkalitaamalaatmanaa]
nanv eṣa sattvaṁ parimārṣṭum arhati
[nanv esha sattvam parimaarshtum arhati]
saḥ — He vai — by providence ayam — this yat — that which padam atra — here is the same Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa sūrayaḥ — great devotees jita-indriyāḥ — who have overcome the influence of the senses nirjita — thoroughly controlled mātariśvanaḥ — life paśyanti — can see bhakti — by dint of devotional service utkalita — developed amala-ātmanā — those whose minds are thoroughly cleansed nanu eṣaḥ — certainly by this only sattvam — existence parimārṣṭum — for purifying the mind completely arhati — deserve.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vā ayaṁ yat padam atra sūrayo
saḥ
He
vai
by providence
ayam
this
yat
that which
padam atra
here is the same Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa
sūrayaḥ
great devotees
jitendriyā nirjita-mātariśvanaḥ
jita-indriyāḥ
who have overcome the influence of the senses
nirjita
thoroughly controlled
mātariśvanaḥ
life
paśyanti bhakty-utkalitāmalātmanā
paśyanti
can see
bhakti
by dint of devotional service
utkalita
developed
amala-ātmanā
those whose minds are thoroughly cleansed
nanu eṣaḥ
certainly by this only
nanv eṣa sattvaṁ parimārṣṭum arhati
sattvam
existence
parimārṣṭum
for purifying the mind completely
arhati
deserve.
Here is the same Supreme Personality of Godhead whose transcendental form is experienced by the great devotees who are completely cleansed of material consciousness by dint of rigid devotional service and full control of life and the senses. And that is the only way to purify existence.

As it is stated in Bhagavad-gītā, the Lord can be known in His real nature by dint of pure devotional service only. So it is stated here that only the great devotees of the Lord who are able to clear the mind of all material dust by rigid devotional service can experience the Lord as He is. Jitendriya means one who has full control over the senses. The senses are active parts of the body, and their activities cannot be stopped. The artificial means of the yogic processes to make the senses inactive has proved to be abject failure, even in the case of great yogīs like Viśvāmitra Muni. Viśvāmitra Muni controlled the senses by yogic trance, but when he happened to meet Menakā (a heavenly society woman), he became a victim of sex, and the artificial way of controlling the senses failed. But in the case of a pure devotee, the senses are not at all artificially stopped from doing anything, but they are given different good engagements. When the senses are engaged in more attractive activities, there is no chance of their being attracted by any inferior engagements. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that the senses can be controlled only by better engagements. Devotional service necessitates purifying the senses or engaging them in the activities of devotional service. Devotional service is not inaction. Anything done in the service of the Lord becomes at once purified of its material nature. The material conception is due to ignorance only. There is nothing beyond Vāsudeva. The Vāsudeva conception gradually develops in the heart of the learned after a prolonged acceleration of the receptive organs. But the process ends in the knowledge of accepting Vāsudeva as all in all. In the case of devotional service, this very same method is accepted from the very beginning, and by the grace of the Lord all factual knowledge becomes revealed in the heart of a devotee due to dictation by the Lord from within. Therefore controlling the senses by devotional service is the only and easiest means.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He is that person whose form the sages who have controlled their senses by controlling their life air see with intelligence purified by intense bhakti. Certainly he can purify the intelligence completely.
Commentary

“The puruṣāvatāras present at the beginning of creation have been described, but Kṛṣṇa is not of that type. He is perceivable now, during Dvāpara-yuga in the twenty-eighth cycle of Vaivasvata-manvantara.” That is true. But though his eternal pastimes and eternal form, perceived by bhakti, have appeared in Dvāpara-yuga, his pastimes can always be perceived by those having devotion. That is expressed in this verse.

Those who control the life air (nirjita-mātariśvaṇaḥ), or those who control the senses because of controlling the life air, by intelligence (ātmanā) purified and enlivened by bhakti, see the lotus feet or the form (padam) of the Lord. Mātariśvānaḥ becomes mātariśvanaḥ by poetic license. Because the senses are dependent on the life air, if one controls the life air, one controls the senses. Śruti says dṛśyate tv agryayā buddhyā: the Lord is seen by eager intelligence. (Katha Upaniṣad 3.12) Next they explain that he is the cause of the purity of their intelligence. Certainly (nanu) he, and not yoga or other processes, can purify completely (parimārṣṭum) the intelligence (sattvam). The implication is that being a sage and conquering the senses and the life air is accomplished by their bhakti alone, not by prāṇāyama or other processes. The sages, being eager with bhakti, see the Lord. This is in the present tense to indicate that his pastimes are visible at all times. Brahmā says ataḥ parārdhyante so ’budhyata gopa-veśo me pūruṣaḥ purastād āvirbabhūva: after a half of my life time, I perceived him; he appeared before me with the dress of a cowherd. (Gopāla-tāpanī Upaniṣad) Also in Brahma-saṁhitā, Kṛṣṇa appeared at the beginning of creation to Brahmā and Brahmā praised him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.24

↗
స వా అయం సఖ్యనుగీతసత్కథో వేదేషు గుహ్యేషు చ గుహ్యవాదిభి: । య ఏక ఈశో జగదాత్మలీలయా సృజత్యవత్యత్తి న తత్ర సజ్జతే ॥ ౨౪ ॥
sa vā ayaṁ sakhy anugīta-sat-katho
[sa vaa ayam sakhy anugeeta-sat-katho]
vedeṣu guhyeṣu ca guhya-vādibhiḥ
[vedeshu guhyeshu cha guhya-vaadibhih]
ya eka īśo jagad-ātma-līlayā
[ya eka eesho jagad-aatma-leelayaa]
sṛjaty avaty atti na tatra sajjate
[srijaty avaty atti na tatra sajjate]
saḥ — He vai — also ayam — this sakhi — O my friend anugīta — described sat-kathaḥ — the excellent pastimes vedeṣu — in the Vedic literatures guhyeṣu — confidentially ca — as also guhya-vādibhiḥ — by the confidential devotees yaḥ — one who ekaḥ — one only īśaḥ — the supreme controller jagat — of the complete creation ātma — Supersoul līlayā — by manifestation of pastimes sṛjati — creates avati atti — also maintains and annihilates na — never tatra — there sajjate — becomes attached to it.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vā ayaṁ sakhy anugīta-sat-katho
saḥ
He
vai
also
ayam
this
sakhi
O my friend
anugīta
described
sat-kathaḥ
the excellent pastimes
vedeṣu guhyeṣu ca guhya-vādibhiḥ
vedeṣu
in the Vedic literatures
guhyeṣu
confidentially
ca
as also
guhya-vādibhiḥ
by the confidential devotees
ya eka īśo jagad-ātma-līlayā
yaḥ
one who
ekaḥ
one only
īśaḥ
the supreme controller
jagat
of the complete creation
ātma
Supersoul
līlayā
by manifestation of pastimes
sṛjaty avaty atti na tatra sajjate
sṛjati
creates
avati atti
also maintains and annihilates
na
never
tatra
there
sajjate
becomes attached to it.
O dear friends, here is that very Personality of Godhead whose attractive and confidential pastimes are described in the confidential parts of Vedic literature by His great devotees. It is He only who creates, maintains and annihilates the material world and yet remains unaffected.

As it is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, all the Vedic literatures are glorifying the greatness of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Here it is confirmed in the Bhāgavatam also. The Vedas are expanded by many branches and subbranches by great devotees and empowered incarnations of the Lord like Vyāsa, Nārada, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the Kumāras, Kapila, Prahlāda, Janaka, Bali and Yamarāja, but in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam especially, the confidential parts of His activities are described by the confidential devotee Śukadeva Gosvāmī. In the Vedānta-sūtras or Upaniṣads there is only a hint of the confidential parts of His pastimes. In such Vedic literatures as the Upaniṣads, the Lord has expressively been distinguished from the mundane conception of His existence. His identity being fully spiritual, His form, name, quality, and paraphernalia, etc., have been elaborately distinguished from matter, and therefore He is sometimes misunderstood by less intelligent persons as impersonal. But factually He is the Supreme Person, Bhagavān, and He is partially represented as Paramātmā or impersonal Brahman.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O friend! He is Kṛṣṇa with human form, friend of Arjuna, who is the subject of pure topics sung by some who discern the secrets in the confidential scriptures, who, though the one Lord, creates, maintains and destroys without being attached, as the soul of the universe.
Commentary

His secret pastimes are known by confidential persons. He, the friend of Arjuna, with human form, is the subject of pure discussion sung by some people who can discern the secrets (guhya-vādibhiḥ) in the secret scriptures. He is indeed the one Lord, who creates, maintains and destroys without being attached, but he does not do this directly with that form.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.25

↗
యదా హ్యధర్మేణ తమోధియో నృపా జీవన్తి తత్రైష హి సత్త్వత: కిల । ధత్తే భగం సత్యమృతం దయాం యశో భవాయ రూపాణి దధద్యుగే యుగే ॥ ౨౫ ॥
yadā hy adharmeṇa tamo-dhiyo nṛpā
[yadaa hy adharmena tamo-dhiyo nripaa]
jīvanti tatraiṣa hi sattvataḥ kila
[jeevanti tatraisha hi sattvatah kila]
dhatte bhagaṁ satyam ṛtaṁ dayāṁ yaśo
[dhatte bhagam satyam ritam dayaam yasho]
bhavāya rūpāṇi dadhad yuge yuge
[bhavaaya roopaani dadhad yuge yuge]
yadā — whenever hi — assuredly adharmeṇa — against the principles of God’s will tamaḥ-dhiyaḥ — persons in the lowest material modes nṛpāḥ — kings and administrators jīvanti — live like animals tatra — thereupon eṣaḥ — He hi — only sattvataḥ — transcendental kila — certainly dhatte — is manifested bhagam — supreme power satyam — truth ṛtam — positiveness dayām — mercy yaśaḥ — wonderful activities bhavāya — for the maintenance rūpāṇi — in various forms dadhat — manifested yuge — different periods yuge — and ages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā hy adharmeṇa tamo-dhiyo nṛpā
yadā
whenever
hi
assuredly
jīvanti tatraiṣa hi sattvataḥ kila
dhatte bhagaṁ satyam ṛtaṁ dayāṁ yaśo
bhavāya rūpāṇi dadhad yuge yuge
adharmeṇa
against the principles of God’s will
tamaḥ-dhiyaḥ
persons in the lowest material modes
nṛpāḥ
kings and administrators
jīvanti
live like animals
tatra
thereupon
eṣaḥ
He
hi
only
sattvataḥ
transcendental
kila
certainly
dhatte
is manifested
bhagam
supreme power
satyam
truth
ṛtam
positiveness
dayām
mercy
yaśaḥ
wonderful activities
bhavāya
for the maintenance
rūpāṇi
in various forms
dadhat
manifested
yuge
different periods
yuge
and ages.
Whenever there are kings and administrators living like animals in the lowest modes of existence, the Lord in His transcendental form manifests His supreme power, the Truth Positive, shows special mercy to the faithful, performs wonderful activities and manifests various transcendental forms as is necessary in different periods and ages.

As mentioned above, the cosmic creation is the property of the Supreme Lord. This is the basic philosophy of Īśopaniṣad: everything is the property of the Supreme Being. No one should encroach upon the property of the Supreme Lord. One should accept only what is kindly awarded by Him. Therefore, the earth or any other planet or universe is the absolute property of the Lord. The living beings are certainly His parts and parcels, or sons, and thus every one of them has a right to live at the mercy of the Lord to execute his prescribed work. No one, therefore, can encroach upon the right of another individual man or animal without being so sanctioned by the Lord. The king or the administrator is the representative of the Lord to look after the management of the Lord’s will. He must therefore be a recognized person like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira or Parīkṣit. Such kings have full responsibility and knowledge from authorities about the administration of the world. But at times, due to the influence of the ignorance mode of material nature ( tamo-guṇa ), the lowest of the material modes, kings and administrators come into power without knowledge and responsibility, and such foolish administrators live like animals for the sake of their own personal interest. The result is that the whole atmosphere becomes surcharged with anarchy and vicious elements. Nepotism, bribery, cheating, aggression and, therefore, famine, epidemic, war and similar other disturbing features become prominent in human society. And the devotees of the Lord or the faithful are persecuted by all means. All these symptoms indicate the time of an incarnation of the Lord to reestablish the principles of religion and to vanquish the maladministrators. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā.

The Lord then appears in His transcendental form without any tinge of material qualities. He descends just to keep the state of His creation in a normal condition. The normal condition is that the Lord has provided each and every planet with all the needs of the native living beings. They can happily live and execute their predestined occupations to attain salvation at the end, following the rules and regulations mentioned in the revealed scriptures. The material world is created to satisfy the whims of the nitya-baddha, or everlasting conditioned souls, just as naughty boys are provided with playing cradles. Otherwise, there was no need of the material world. But when they become intoxicated with the power of material science to exploit the resources unlawfully without the sanction of the Lord, and that also only for sense gratification, there is necessity of the Lord’s incarnation to chastise the rebellious and to protect the faithful.

When He descends, He exhibits superhuman acts just to prove His supreme right, and materialists like Rāvaṇa, Hiraṇyakaśipu and Kaṁsa are sufficiently punished. He acts in a manner which no one can imitate. For example, the Lord, when He appeared as Rāma, bridged the Indian Ocean. When He appeared as Kṛṣṇa, from His very childhood He showed superhuman activities by killing Pūtanā, Aghāsura, Śakaṭāsura, Kāliya, etc., and then His maternal uncle Kaṁsa. When He was at Dvārakā He married 16,108 queens, and all of them were blessed with a sufficient number of children. The sum total of His personal family members amounted to about 100,000, popularly known as the Yadu-vaṁśa. And again, during His lifetime, He managed to vanquish them all. He is famous as the Govardhana-dhārī Hari because He lifted at the age of only seven the hill known as Govardhana. The Lord killed many undesirable kings in His time, and as a kṣatriya He fought chivalrously. He is famous as asamordhva, unparalleled. No one is equal to or greater than Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When kings whose minds are affected by ignorance live by irreligion, then Kṛṣṇa, accepting forms for the welfare of the world in Vraja, Mathurā and Dvārakā, in every day of Brahmā, displays his six powers, truth, pleasing words, mercy and good qualities endowed with pure sattva.
Commentary

For those asking about the time, place and persons for the avatāras’ appearances, they first speak of the time. Kings (nṛpāḥ) refers to person like Kaṁsa. When these kings appear, the Lord assumes his six powers (bhagam), truth (satyam), pleasant words (ṛtam), mercy and good qualities, endowed with the highest sattva (sattvataḥ). He accepts beautiful forms in Vraja, Mathurā and Dvārakā in every day of Brahmā (yuge yuge), or in every Dvāpara-yuga of the twenty-eighth cycle in Vaivasvata-manvantara in each day of Brahmā.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.26

↗
అహో అలం శ్లాఘ్యతమం యదో: కుల- మహో అలం పుణ్యతమం మధోర్వనమ్ । యదేష పుంసామృషభ: శ్రియ: పతి: స్వజన్మనా చఙ్‍క్రమణేన చాఞ్చతి ॥ ౨౬ ॥
aho alaṁ ślāghyatamaṁ yadoḥ kulam
[aho alam shlaaghyatamam yadoh kulam]
aho alaṁ puṇyatamaṁ madhor vanam
[aho alam punyatamam madhor vanam]
yad eṣa puṁsām ṛṣabhaḥ śriyaḥ patiḥ
[yad esha pumsaam rishabhah shriyah patih]
sva-janmanā caṅkramaṇena cāṣcati
[sva-janmanaa chankramanena chaashchati]
aho — oh alam — verily ślāghya-tamam — supremely glorified yadoḥ — of King Yadu kulam — dynasty aho — oh alam — verily puṇya-tamam — supremely virtuous madhoḥ vanam — the land of Mathurā yat — because eṣaḥ — this puṁsām — of all the living beings ṛṣabhaḥ — supreme leader śriyaḥ — of the goddess of fortune patiḥ — husband sva-janmanā — by His appearance caṅkramaṇena — by crawling ca aṣcati — glories.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho alaṁ ślāghyatamaṁ yadoḥ kulam
aho
oh
alam
verily
ślāghya-tamam
supremely glorified
yadoḥ
of King Yadu
kulam
dynasty
aho alaṁ puṇyatamaṁ madhor vanam
aho
oh
alam
verily
puṇya-tamam
supremely virtuous
madhoḥ vanam
the land of Mathurā
yad eṣa puṁsām ṛṣabhaḥ śriyaḥ patiḥ
yat
because
eṣaḥ
this
puṁsām
of all the living beings
ṛṣabhaḥ
supreme leader
śriyaḥ
of the goddess of fortune
patiḥ
husband
sva-janmanā caṅkramaṇena cāṣcati
sva-janmanā
by His appearance
caṅkramaṇena
by crawling
ca aṣcati
glories.
Oh, how supremely glorified is the dynasty of King Yadu, and how virtuous is the land of Mathurā, where the supreme leader of all living beings, the husband of the goddess of fortune, has taken His birth and wandered in His childhood.

In the Bhagavad-gītā the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, has expressively given a description of His transcendental appearance, disappearance and activities. The Lord appears in a particular family or place by His inconceivable potency. He does not take His birth as a conditioned soul quits his body and accepts another body. His birth is like the appearance and disappearance of the sun. The sun arises on the eastern horizon, but that does not mean that the eastern horizon is the parent of the sun. The sun is existent in every part of the solar system, but he becomes visible at a scheduled time and so also becomes invisible at another scheduled time. Similarly, the Lord appears in this universe like the sun and again leaves our sight at another time. He exists at all times and at every place, but by His causeless mercy when He appears before us we take it for granted that He has taken His birth. Anyone who can understand this truth, in terms of the statements of revealed scriptures, certainly becomes liberated just after quitting the present body. Liberation is obtainable after many births and after great endeavor in patience and perseverance, in knowledge and renunciation. But simply by knowing in truth about the Lord’s transcendental births and activities, one can get liberation at once. That is the verdict of the Bhagavad-gītā. But those who are in the darkness of ignorance conclude that the Lord’s birth and activities in the material world are similar to those of the ordinary living being. Such imperfect conclusions cannot give anyone liberation. His birth, therefore, in the family of King Yadu as the son of King Vasudeva and His transfer into the family of Nanda Mahārāja in the land of Mathurā are all transcendental arrangements made by the internal potency of the Lord. The fortunes of the Yadu dynasty and that of the inhabitants of the land of Mathurā cannot be materially estimated. If simply by knowing the transcendental nature of the birth and activities of the Lord one can get liberation easily, we can just imagine what is in store for those who actually enjoyed the company of the Lord in person as a family member or as a neighbor. All those who were fortunate enough to associate with the Lord, the husband of the goddess of fortune, certainly obtained something more than what is known as liberation. Therefore, rightly, the dynasty and the land are both ever glorious by the grace of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! Most praiseworthy is the family of Yadu! Most purifying is Mathurā-maṇḍala, which Kṛṣṇa, the best of men, the Lord of auspiciousness, respects by taking birth there, moving about and performing pastimes.
Commentary

Now they speak about the recipients and place of the Lord’s appearance. Though the excellence of both the recipients and place is accomplished by saying that both are praiseworthy (ślāghyatamam), a separate statement is made about the purity of the area around Mathurā in the second line, since the place is well known for its purifying powers. The extreme nature of this purity is expressed by alam (can this be so?) which expresses disbelief. Furthermore the word aho expresses the greatest astonishment. By his birth, by his walking about the place, and by other various astonishing activities (ca), Kṛṣṇa respected the area of Mathurā. By the use of the present tense without saying alam (no disbelief), they indicate that the birth and activities of Kṛṣṇa are eternal. Their intention can be understood by comparing their first statement describing the pastime of creation in the past tense ya eka āsīt (SB 1.10.21) and the vision of the sages in the present tense (SB 1.10.23). “How can the birth and activities be eternal? Those are actions, and any action or its part has a beginning and an end. Without beginning and end there will be a deficiency in the very nature of action.” No, this is not a fault. Since the Lord has unlimited forms at all times, he has unlimited manifestations. Because of that he has unlimited pastimes of birth and activities. And thus he has unlimited manifestations of places and associates in this world and the spiritual world for those pastimes. Thus though there are beginning and endings of his birth and activities for each of these manifested forms in each of these places, the moment a portion of the birth or activities ends or even before it ends, the birth and activities begin in other places. Because there is no lack of continuity in the Lord, his birth and activities are eternal. Sometimes the birth and activities take place in a slightly different manner and sometimes in exactly the same manner, because of difference or oneness of different conditions. And as well one form becomes many for performing different actions at once. This will be explained in relation to Kṛṣṇa’s expansions in Dvārakā. (SB 10.69.3) At that time it should be understood that Kṛṣṇa has different identities in each of these different active forms because they perform different actions. And there is a particular appearance of rasa caused by the particular pastime in the particular place. “Why did you speak of the birth and activities as one item? Because they begin separately, they should be considered separately.” No, there is oneness of similar forms of actions even though they appear at different times. Śaṅkara-śārīrika says: dvirgo-śabdo ’yam uccarito na tu dvau go-śabdāv iti pratīti-nirṇītaṁ śabdaikatvam tathaiva dviḥ pākaḥ kṛto’nena na tu dvau pākāv

When one says the word dvirgo one does not perceive two different words but one. Similarly we do conceive of dviḥ pākaḥ as one, not two words.

Therefore it is correct to say that the birth and pastimes together are eternal. Thus in various scriptures it is recommended to perform meditation on the pastimes which took place previously (since they are eternal). This is also stated in Madhva’s commentary relating to Paramātmā. Thus, because they are eternal, forms such as Trivikrama can disappear with no contradiction. Śruti agrees with this. Yad bhūtaṁ bhavac ca bhaviṣyac ca: the Lord was present in the past, is present now and will be present in the future. (Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 3.8.3) This means that though the Lord disappears, he is still recommended as the best object of worship. It should be understood that the Lord’s birth is different from our material birth. The Lord makes an appearance in the likeness of a material birth or somewhat similar. This is explained in Bhagavat-sandarbha. Some say that the pastimes as well as the devotees and dhāmas are called eternal simply because there are many manifestations of his birth and activities in infinite, eternal dhāmas in the material world.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.27

↗
అహో బత స్వర్యశసస్తిరస్కరీ కుశస్థలీ పుణ్యయశస్కరీ భువ: । పశ్యన్తి నిత్యం యదనుగ్రహేషితం స్మితావలోకం స్వపతిం స్మ యత్ప్రజా: ॥ ౨౭ ॥
aho bata svar-yaśasas tiraskarī
[aho bata svar-yashasas tiraskaree]
kuśasthalī puṇya-yaśaskarī bhuvaḥ
[kushasthalee punya-yashaskaree bhuvah]
paśyanti nityaṁ yad anugraheṣitaṁ
[pashyanti nityam yad anugraheshitam]
smitāvalokaṁ sva-patiṁ sma yat-prajāḥ
[smitaavalokam sva-patim sma yat-prajaah]
aho bata — how wonderful this is svaḥ-yaśasaḥ — the glories of the heavenly planets tiraskarī — that which defeats kuśasthalī — Dvārakā puṇya — virtue yaśaskarī — famous bhuvaḥ — the planet earth paśyanti — see nityam — constantly yat — that which anugraha-iṣitam — to bestow benediction smita-avalokam — glance with the favor of sweet smiling sva-patim — unto the soul of the living being (Kṛṣṇa) sma — used to yat-prajāḥ — the inhabitants of the place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho bata svar-yaśasas tiraskarī
aho bata
how wonderful this is
svaḥ-yaśasaḥ
the glories of the heavenly planets
tiraskarī
that which defeats
kuśasthalī puṇya-yaśaskarī bhuvaḥ
kuśasthalī
Dvārakā
puṇya
virtue
yaśaskarī
famous
bhuvaḥ
the planet earth
paśyanti nityaṁ yad anugraheṣitaṁ
paśyanti
see
nityam
constantly
yat
that which
anugraha-iṣitam
to bestow benediction
smitāvalokaṁ sva-patiṁ sma yat-prajāḥ
smita-avalokam
glance with the favor of sweet smiling
sva-patim
unto the soul of the living being (Kṛṣṇa)
sma
used to
yat-prajāḥ
the inhabitants of the place.
Undoubtedly it is wonderful that Dvārakā has defeated the glories of the heavenly planets and has enhanced the celebrity of the earth. The inhabitants of Dvārakā are always seeing the soul of all living beings [Kṛṣṇa] in His loving feature. He glances at them and favors them with sweet smiles.

The heavenly planets are inhabited by demigods like Indra, Candra, Varuṇa and Vāyu, and the pious souls reach there after performance of many virtuous acts on earth. Modern scientists agree that the timing arrangement in higher planetary systems is different from that of the earth. Thus it is understood from the revealed scriptures that the duration of life there is ten thousand years (by our calculation). Six months on earth is equal to one day on the heavenly planets. Facilities of enjoyment are also similarly enhanced, and the beauty of the inhabitants is legendary. Common men on the earth are very much fond of reaching the heavenly planets because they have heard that comforts of life are far greater there than on the earth. They are now trying to reach the moon by spacecraft. Considering all this, the heavenly planets are more celebrated than the earth. But the celebrity of earth has defeated that of the heavenly planets because of Dvārakā, where Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa reigned as King. Three places, namely Vṛndāvana, Mathurā and Dvārakā, are more important than the famous planets within the universe. These places are perpetually sanctified because whenever the Lord descends to earth He displays His transcendental activities particularly in these three places. They are perpetually the holy lands of the Lord, and the inhabitants still take advantage of the holy places, even though the Lord is now out of their sight. The Lord is the soul of all living beings, and He desires always to have all the living beings, in their svarūpa, in their constitutional position, to participate in transcendental life in His association. His attractive features and sweet smiles go deep into the heart of everyone, and once it is so done the living being is admitted into the kingdom of God, from which no one returns. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā.

The heavenly planets may be very famous for offering better facilities of material enjoyment, but as we learn from the Bhagavad-gītā (9.20-21), one has to come back again to the earth planet as soon as the acquired virtue is finished. Dvārakā is certainly more important than the heavenly planets because whoever has been favored with the smiling glance of the Lord shall never come back again to this rotten earth, which is certified by the Lord Himself as a place of misery. Not only this earth but also all the planets of the universes are places of misery because in none of the planets within the universe is there eternal life, eternal bliss and eternal knowledge. Any person engaged in the devotional service of the Lord is recommended to live in one of the above-mentioned three places, namely Dvārakā, Mathurā or Vṛndāvana. Because devotional service in these three places is magnified, those who go there to follow the principles in terms of instructions imparted in the revealed scriptures surely achieve the same result as obtained during the presence of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. His abode and He Himself are identical, and a pure devotee under the guidance of another experienced devotee can obtain all the results, even at present.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! Dvārakā derides the fame of Svarga. It gives fame to purity on this earth, because the inhabitants constantly see Kṛṣṇa with smiling face, who was sent here by mercy!
Commentary

Having glorified Mathurā-maṇḍala, they now remember Dvārakā. Oh! Dvārakā (kuśasthalī) surpasses the fame of Svarga. This is a statement in deference to common attitudes, not scriptural truth (since there is no comparison to Svarga at all). If it is svar-yaśasaḥ it means that Dvārakā surpasses Vaikuṇṭha. This is because (yat) the residents there (yat-prajāḥ) see Kṛṣṇa (sva-patim) who by mercy was dispatched (iṣitam) from Hastināpura or from his inner palace in order to give happiness to the citizens. Or the phrase can mean “they see Kṛṣṇa who is sought in order to attain his mercy.” Anugrahoṣitam is also seen in some versions. This mean “they see Kṛṣṇa who resided there to give mercy.” This situation does not occur in Svarga.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.28

↗
నూనం వ్రతస్‍నానహుతాదినేశ్వర: సమర్చితో హ్యస్య గృహీతపాణిభి: । పిబన్తి యా: సఖ్యధరామృతం ముహు- ర్వ్రజస్త్రియ: సమ్ముముహుర్యదాశయా: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
nūnaṁ vrata-snāna-hutādineśvaraḥ
[noonam vrata-snaana-hutaadineshvarah]
samarcito hy asya gṛhīta-pāṇibhiḥ
[samarchito hy asya griheeta-paanibhih]
pibanti yāḥ sakhy adharāmṛtaṁ muhur
[pibanti yaah sakhy adharaamritam muhur]
vraja-striyaḥ sammumuhur yad-āśayāḥ
[vraja-striyah sammumuhur yad-aashayaah]
nūnam — certainly in the previous birth vrata — vow snāna — bath huta — sacrifice in the fire ādinā — by all these īśvaraḥ — the Personality of Godhead samarcitaḥ — perfectly worshiped hi — certainly asya — His gṛhīta-pāṇibhiḥ — by the married wives pibanti — relishes yāḥ — those who sakhi — O friend adhara-amṛtam — the nectar from His lips muhuḥ — again and again vraja-striyaḥ — the damsels of Vrajabhūmi sammumuhuḥ — often fainted yat-āśayāḥ — expecting to be favored in that way.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nūnaṁ vrata-snāna-hutādineśvaraḥ
nūnam
certainly in the previous birth
vrata
vow
snāna
bath
huta
sacrifice in the fire
ādinā
by all these
īśvaraḥ
the Personality of Godhead
samarcito hy asya gṛhīta-pāṇibhiḥ
samarcitaḥ
perfectly worshiped
hi
certainly
pibanti yāḥ sakhy adharāmṛtaṁ muhur
vraja-striyaḥ sammumuhur yad-āśayāḥ
asya
His
gṛhīta-pāṇibhiḥ
by the married wives
pibanti
relishes
yāḥ
those who
sakhi
O friend
adhara-amṛtam
the nectar from His lips
muhuḥ
again and again
vraja-striyaḥ
the damsels of Vrajabhūmi
sammumuhuḥ
often fainted
yat-āśayāḥ
expecting to be favored in that way.
O friends, just think of His wives, whose hands He has accepted. How they must have undergone vows, baths, fire sacrifices and perfect worship of the Lord of the universe to constantly relish now the nectar from His lips [by kissing]. The damsels of Vrajabhūmi would often faint just by expecting such favors.

Religious rites prescribed in the scriptures are meant to purify the mundane qualities of the conditioned souls to enable them to be gradually promoted to the stage of rendering transcendental service unto the Supreme Lord. Attainment of this stage of pure spiritual life is the highest perfection, and this stage is called svarūpa, or the factual identity of the living being. Liberation means renovation of this stage of svarūpa. In that perfect stage of svarūpa, the living being is established in five phases of loving service, one of which is the stage of mādhurya-rasa, or the humor of conjugal love. The Lord is always perfect in Himself, and thus He has no hankering for Himself. He, however, becomes a master, a friend, a son or a husband to fulfill the intense love of the devotee concerned. Herein two classes of devotees of the Lord are mentioned in the stage of conjugal love. One is svakīya, and the other is parakīya. Both of them are in conjugal love with the Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa. The queens at Dvārakā were svakīya, or duly married wives, but the damsels of Vraja were young friends of the Lord while He was unmarried. The Lord stayed at Vṛndāvana till the age of sixteen, and His friendly relations with the neighboring girls were in terms of parakīya. These girls, as well as the queens, underwent severe penances by taking vows, bathing and offering sacrifices in the fire, as prescribed in the scriptures. The rites, as they are, are not an end in themselves, nor are fruitive action, culture of knowledge or perfection in mystic powers ends in themselves. They are all means to attain to the highest stage of svarūpa, to render constitutional transcendental service to the Lord. Each and every living being has his individual position in one of the above-mentioned five different kinds of reciprocating means with the Lord, and in one’s pure spiritual form of svarūpa the relation becomes manifest without mundane affinity. The kissing of the Lord, either by His wives or His young girlfriends who aspired to have the Lord as their fiance, is not of any mundane perverted quality. Had such things been mundane, a liberated soul like Śukadeva would not have taken the trouble to relish them, nor would Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu have been inclined to participate in those subjects after renouncing worldly life. The stage is earned after many lives of penance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O friend! The wives of Kṛṣṇa who drink the nectar of his lips constantly must have certainly worshipped him by austerities, bathing in sacred places and sacrifices in previous lives to attain their present status. But the women of Vraja whose minds were completely absorbed in that nectar fainted in bliss simply because of remembering it.
Commentary

This verse describes the women with mādhurya-rasa. Certainly Kṛṣṇa was worshipped by vows, bathing and sacrifices by his wives who drink the nectar of his lips constantly. Let us also, not having performed vows or bathing, drink the nectar of his beauty right now. Those wives are much superior to us, even with our millions of good qualities. But they are much inferior to the women of Vraja! Those whose minds were absorbed (āśayāḥ) in the sweetness of those lips fainted in bliss (sammumuhuḥ) by remembering that sweetness in the morning. What kind of condition they attained on actually drinking that nectar at night we do not know! In this way the gopīs’ extreme bliss arising from their extreme prema is indicated.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.29

↗
యా వీర్యశుల్కేన హృతా: స్వయంవరే ప్రమథ్య చైద్యప్రముఖాన్ హి శుష్మిణ: । ప్రద్యుమ్నసామ్బామ్బసుతాదయోఽపరా యాశ్చాహృతా భౌమవధే సహస్రశ: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
yā vīrya-śulkena hṛtāḥ svayaṁvare
[yaa veerya-shulkena hritaah svayamvare]
pramathya caidya-pramukhān hi śuṣmiṇaḥ
[pramathya chaidya-pramukhaan hi shushminah]
pradyumna-sāmbāmba-sutādayo ’parā
[pradyumna-saambaamba-sutaadayo ’paraa]
yāś cāhṛtā bhauma-vadhe sahasraśaḥ
[yaash chaahritaa bhauma-vadhe sahasrashah]
yā — the lady vīrya — prowess śulkena — by payment of the price hṛtāḥ — taken away by force svayaṁvare — in the open selection of the bridegroom pramathya — harassing caidya — King Śiśupāla pramukhān — headed by hi — positively śuṣmiṇaḥ — all very powerful pradyumna — Pradyumna (Kṛṣṇa’s son) sāmba — Sāmba amba — Amba suta-ādayaḥ — children aparāḥ — other ladies yāḥ — those ca — also āhṛtāḥ — similarly brought bhauma-vadhe — after killing kings sahasraśaḥ — by the thousands.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yā vīrya-śulkena hṛtāḥ svayaṁvare
yā
the lady
vīrya
prowess
śulkena
by payment of the price
hṛtāḥ
taken away by force
svayaṁvare
in the open selection of the bridegroom
pramathya caidya-pramukhān hi śuṣmiṇaḥ
pramathya
harassing
caidya
King Śiśupāla
pramukhān
headed by
hi
positively
śuṣmiṇaḥ
all very powerful
pradyumna-sāmbāmba-sutādayo ’parā
pradyumna
Pradyumna (Kṛṣṇa’s son)
sāmba
Sāmba
amba
Amba
suta-ādayaḥ
children
aparāḥ
other ladies
yāś cāhṛtā bhauma-vadhe sahasraśaḥ
yāḥ
those
ca
also
āhṛtāḥ
similarly brought
bhauma-vadhe
after killing kings
sahasraśaḥ
by the thousands.
The children of these ladies are Pradyumna, Sāmba, Amba, etc. Ladies like Rukmiṇī, Satyabhāmā and Jāmbavatī were forcibly taken away by Him from their svayaṁvara ceremonies after He defeated many powerful kings, headed by Śiśupāla. And other ladies were also forcibly taken away by Him after He killed Bhaumāsura and thousands of his assistants. All of these ladies are glorious.

Exceptionally qualified daughters of powerful kings were allowed to make a choice of their own bridegrooms in open competition, and such ceremonies were called svayaṁvara, or selection of the bridegroom. Because the svayaṁvara was an open competition between the rival and valiant princes, such princes were invited by the father of the princess, and usually there were regular fights between the invited princely order in a sporting spirit. But it so happened that sometimes the belligerent princes were killed in such marriage-fighting, and the victorious prince was offered the trophy princess for whom so many princes died. Rukmiṇī, the principal queen of Lord Kṛṣṇa, was the daughter of the King of Vidarbha, who wished that his qualified and beautiful daughter be given away to Lord Kṛṣṇa. But her eldest brother wanted her to be given away to King Śiśupāla, who happened to be a cousin of Kṛṣṇa. So there was open competition, and as usual Lord Kṛṣṇa emerged successful, after harassing Śiśupāla and other princes by His unrivalled prowess. Rukmiṇī had ten sons, like Pradyumna. There were other queens also taken away by Lord Kṛṣṇa in a similar way. Full description of this beautiful booty of Lord Kṛṣṇa will be given in the Tenth Canto. There were 16,100 beautiful girls who were daughters of many kings and were forcibly stolen by Bhaumāsura, who kept them captive for his carnal desire. These girls prayed piteously to Lord Kṛṣṇa for their deliverance, and the merciful Lord, called by their fervent prayer, released them all by fighting and killing Bhaumāsura. All these captive princesses were then accepted by the Lord as His wives, although in the estimation of society they were all fallen girls. The all-powerful Lord Kṛṣṇa accepted the humble prayers of these girls and married them with the adoration of queens. So altogether Lord Kṛṣṇa had 16,108 queens at Dvārakā, and in each of them He begot ten children. All these children grew up, and each had as many children as the father. The aggregate of the family numbered in the millions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rukmiṇī, Jāmbavatī, Nāgnajitī and others, who were taken away at the price of valor after Kṛṣṇa defeated strong kings headed by Śiśupāla and others in the thousands, who were accepted by him on killing Narakāsura, and who had been impure and had lost all auspiciousness, then became the best of women, because lotus-eyed Kṛṣṇa, increasing the bliss in their hearts by bringing things to them, never left their houses.
Commentary

Two verses elaborate on what has been said. Vīrya-śulkena means “by the price of valor.” Śuṣminaḥ means “strong.” Those who had Pradyumna, Sāmba and Āmba as sons refers to Rukmiṇī, Jāmbavatī and Nāgnajitī. “Others” includes Satyabhāmā. Apāsta-peśalam means “having lost auspiciousness or independence.” Nirasta-śaucam means “having lost purity.” Kṛṣṇa never left their houses. He touched their hearts, or increased their bliss by bringing various beautiful gifts like the Pārijāta tree.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.30

↗
ఏతా: పరం స్త్రీత్వమపాస్తపేశలం నిరస్తశౌచం బత సాధు కుర్వతే । యాసాం గృహాత్పుష్కరలోచన: పతి- ర్న జాత్వపైత్యాహృతిభిర్హృది స్పృశన్ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
etāḥ paraṁ strītvam apāstapeśalaṁ
[etaah param streetvam apaastapeshalam]
nirasta-śaucaṁ bata sādhu kurvate
[nirasta-shaucham bata saadhu kurvate]
yāsāṁ gṛhāt puṣkara-locanaḥ patir
[yaasaam grihaat pushkara-lochanah patir]
na jātv apaity āhṛtibhir hṛdi spṛśan
[na jaatv apaity aahritibhir hridi sprishan]
etāḥ — all these women param — highest strītvam — womanhood apāstapeśalam — without individuality nirasta — without śaucam — purity bata sādhu — auspiciously glorified kurvate — do they make yāsām — from whose gṛhāt — homes puṣkara-locanaḥ — the lotus-eyed patiḥ — husband na jātu — never at any time apaiti — goes away āhṛtibhiḥ — by presentation hṛdi — in the heart spṛśan — endeared.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etāḥ paraṁ strītvam apāstapeśalaṁ
etāḥ
all these women
param
highest
strītvam
womanhood
apāstapeśalam
without individuality
nirasta-śaucaṁ bata sādhu kurvate
nirasta
without
śaucam
purity
bata sādhu
auspiciously glorified
kurvate
do they make
yāsāṁ gṛhāt puṣkara-locanaḥ patir
yāsām
from whose
gṛhāt
homes
puṣkara-locanaḥ
the lotus-eyed
patiḥ
husband
na jātv apaity āhṛtibhir hṛdi spṛśan
na jātu
never at any time
apaiti
goes away
āhṛtibhiḥ
by presentation
hṛdi
in the heart
spṛśan
endeared.
All these women auspiciously glorified their lives despite their being without individuality and without purity. Their husband, the lotus-eyed Personality of Godhead, never left them alone at home. He always pleased their hearts by making valuable presentations.

The devotees of the Lord are purified souls. As soon as the devotees surrender unto the lotus feet of the Lord sincerely, the Lord accepts them, and thus the devotees at once become free from all material contaminations. Such devotees are above the three modes of material nature. There is no bodily disqualification of a devotee, just as there is no qualitative difference between the Ganges water and the filthy drain water when they are amalgamated. Women, merchants and laborers are not very intelligent, and thus it is very difficult for them to understand the science of God or to be engaged in the devotional service of the Lord. They are more materialistic, and less than them are the Kirātas, Hūṇas, Āndhras, Pulindas, Pulkaśas, Ābhīras, Kaṅkas, Yavanas, Khasas, etc., but all of them can be delivered if they are properly engaged in the devotional service of the Lord. By engagement in the service of the Lord, the designative disqualifications are removed, and as pure souls they become eligible to enter into the kingdom of God.

The fallen girls under the clutches of Bhaumāsura sincerely prayed to Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa for their deliverance, and their sincerity of purpose made them at once pure by virtue of devotion. The Lord therefore accepted them as His wives, and thus their lives became glorified. Such auspicious glorification was still more glorified when the Lord played with them as the most devoted husband.

The Lord used to live with His 16,108 wives constantly. He expanded Himself into 16,108 plenary portions, and each and every one of Them was the Lord Himself without deviation from the original personality. The śruti-mantra affirms that the Lord can expand Himself into many. As husband of so many wives, He pleased them all with presentations, even at a costly endeavor. He brought the pārijāta plant from heaven and implanted it at the palace of Satyabhāmā, one of the principal queens. If, therefore, anyone desires the Lord to become one’s husband, the Lord fulfills such desires in full.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rukmiṇī, Jāmbavatī, Nāgnajitī and others, who were taken away at the price of valor after Kṛṣṇa defeated strong kings headed by Śiśupāla and others in the thousands, who were accepted by him on killing Narakāsura, and who had been impure and had lost all auspiciousness, then became the best of women, because lotus-eyed Kṛṣṇa, increasing the bliss in their hearts by bringing things to them, never left their houses.
Commentary

Two verses elaborate on what has been said. Vīrya-śulkena means “by the price of valor.” Śuṣminaḥ means “strong.” Those who had Pradyumna, Sāmba and Āmba as sons refers to Rukmiṇī, Jāmbavatī and Nāgnajitī. “Others” includes Satyabhāmā. Apāsta-peśalam means “having lost auspiciousness or independence.” Nirasta-śaucam means “having lost purity.” Kṛṣṇa never left their houses. He touched their hearts, or increased their bliss by bringing various beautiful gifts like the Pārijāta tree.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.31

↗
ఏవంవిధా గదన్తీనాం స గిర: పురయోషితామ్ । నిరీక్షణేనాభినన్దన్ సస్మితేన యయౌ హరి: ॥ ౩౧ ॥
evaṁvidhā gadantīnāṁ
[evamvidhaa gadanteenaam]
sa giraḥ pura-yoṣitām
[sa girah pura-yoshitaam]
nirīkṣaṇenābhinandan
[nireekshanenaabhinandan]
sasmitena yayau hariḥ
[sasmitena yayau harih]
evaṁvidhāḥ — in this way gadantīnām — thus praying and talking about Him saḥ — He (the Lord) giraḥ — of words pura-yoṣitām — of the ladies of the capital nirīkṣaṇena — by His grace of glancing over them abhinandan — and greeting them sa-smitena — with a smiling face yayau — departed hariḥ — the Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁvidhā gadantīnāṁ
evaṁvidhāḥ
in this way
gadantīnām
thus praying and talking about Him
sa giraḥ pura-yoṣitām
saḥ
He (the Lord)
giraḥ
of words
pura-yoṣitām
of the ladies of the capital
nirīkṣaṇenābhinandan
nirīkṣaṇena
by His grace of glancing over them
abhinandan
and greeting them
sasmitena yayau hariḥ
sa-smitena
with a smiling face
yayau
departed
hariḥ
the Personality of Godhead.
While the ladies of the capital [Hastināpura] were greeting Him and talking in this way, the Lord, smiling, accepted their good greetings, and casting the grace of His glance over them, He departed from the city.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Acknowledging the words of the women of Hastināpura who had spoken in this way, with smiles and glances, Kṛṣṇa departed.
Commentary

By his glances he pleased the women who had śānta-rati, and by his smiles he pleased those with mādhurya-bhāva.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.32

↗
అజాతశత్రు: పృతనాం గోపీథాయ మధుద్విష: । పరేభ్య: శఙ్కిత: స్‍నేహాత్ప్రాయుఙ్క్త చతురఙ్గిణీమ్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
ajāta-śatruḥ pṛtanāṁ
[ajaata-shatruh pritanaam]
gopīthāya madhu-dviṣaḥ
[gopeethaaya madhu-dvishah]
parebhyaḥ śaṅkitaḥ snehāt
[parebhyah shankitah snehaat]
prāyuṅkta catur-aṅgiṇīm
[praayunkta chatur-angineem]
ajāta-śatruḥ — Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, who was no one’s enemy pṛtanām — defensive forces gopīthāya — for giving protection madhu-dviṣaḥ — of the enemy of Madhu (Śrī Kṛṣṇa) parebhyaḥ — from others (enemies) śaṅkitaḥ — being afraid of snehāt — out of affection prāyuṅkta — engaged catuḥ-aṅginīm — four defensive divisions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ajāta-śatruḥ pṛtanāṁ
ajāta-śatruḥ
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, who was no one’s enemy
pṛtanām
defensive forces
gopīthāya madhu-dviṣaḥ
gopīthāya
for giving protection
madhu-dviṣaḥ
of the enemy of Madhu (Śrī Kṛṣṇa)
parebhyaḥ śaṅkitaḥ snehāt
parebhyaḥ
from others (enemies)
śaṅkitaḥ
being afraid of
snehāt
out of affection
prāyuṅkta catur-aṅgiṇīm
prāyuṅkta
engaged
catuḥ-aṅginīm
four defensive divisions.
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, although no one’s enemy, engaged four divisions of defense [horse, elephant, chariot and army] to accompany Lord Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of the asuras [demons]. The Mahārāja did this because of the enemy, and also out of affection for the Lord.

Natural defensive measures are horses and elephants combined with chariots and men. Horses and elephants are trained to move to any part of the hills or forests and plains. The charioteers could fight with many horses and elephants by the strength of powerful arrows, even up to the standard of the brahmāstra (similar to modern atomic weapons). Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira knew well that Kṛṣṇa is everyone’s friend and well-wisher, and yet there were asuras who were by nature envious of the Lord. So out of fear of attack from others and out of affection also, he engaged all varieties of defensive forces as bodyguards of Lord Kṛṣṇa. If required, Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself was sufficient to defend Himself from the attack of others who counted the Lord as their enemy, but still He accepted all the arrangements made by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira because He could not disobey the King, who was His elder cousin. The Lord plays the part of a subordinate in His transcendental sporting, and thus sometimes He puts Himself in the care of Yaśodāmātā for His protection in His so-called helplessness of childhood. That is the transcendental līlā, or pastime of the Lord. The basic principle for all transcendental exchanges between the Lord and His devotees is exhibited to enjoy a transcendental bliss for which there is no comparison, even up to the level of brahmānanda.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Yudhiṣṭhira, worried about enemies, out of affection engaged an army of four parts [Note: According to Śrīdhara Svāmī the four parts are elephants, horses, chariots and foot soldiers. ] for the protection of Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

Gopīthāya means “for protection.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.33

↗
అథ దూరాగతాన్ శౌరి: కౌరవాన్ విరహాతురాన్ । సన్నివర్త్య ద‍ృఢం స్‍నిగ్ధాన్ ప్రాయాత్స్వనగరీం ప్రియై: ॥ ౩౩ ॥
atha dūrāgatān śauriḥ
[atha dooraagataan shaurih]
kauravān virahāturān
[kauravaan virahaaturaan]
sannivartya dṛḍhaṁ snigdhān
[sannivartya dridham snigdhaan]
prāyāt sva-nagarīṁ priyaiḥ
[praayaat sva-nagareem priyaih]
atha — thus dūrāgatān — having accompanied Him for a long distance śauriḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa kauravān — the Pāṇḍavas virahāturān — overwhelmed by a sense of separation sannivartya — politely persuaded dṛḍham — determined snigdhān — full of affection prāyāt — proceeded sva-nagarīm — towards His own city (Dvārakā) priyaiḥ — with dear companions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha dūrāgatān śauriḥ
atha
thus
dūrāgatān
having accompanied Him for a long distance
śauriḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
kauravān virahāturān
kauravān
the Pāṇḍavas
virahāturān
overwhelmed by a sense of separation
sannivartya dṛḍhaṁ snigdhān
sannivartya
politely persuaded
dṛḍham
determined
snigdhān
full of affection
prāyāt sva-nagarīṁ priyaiḥ
prāyāt
proceeded
sva-nagarīm
towards His own city (Dvārakā)
priyaiḥ
with dear companions.
Out of profound affection for Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Pāṇḍavas, who were of the Kuru dynasty, accompanied Him a considerable distance to see Him off. They were overwhelmed with the thought of future separation. The Lord, however, persuaded them to return home, and He proceeded towards Dvārakā with His dear companions.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Leaving the Pāṇḍavas who were most affectionate, who were afflicted by separation, and who had accompanied him for a long way, Kṛṣṇa went to Dvārakā.
Commentary

Kauravān means the Pāṇḍavas.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.34-35

↗
కురుజాఙ్గలపాఞ్చాలాన్ శూరసేనాన్ సయామునాన్ । బ్రహ్మావర్తం కురుక్షేత్రం మత్స్యాన్ సారస్వతానథ ॥ ౩౪ ॥ మరుధన్వమతిక్రమ్య సౌవీరాభీరయో: పరాన్ । ఆనర్తాన్ భార్గవోపాగాచ్ఛ్రాన్తవాహో మనాగ్విభు: ॥ ౩౫ ॥
kuru-jāṅgala-pāṣcālān
[kuru-jaangala-paashchaalaan]
śūrasenān sayāmunān
[shoorasenaan sayaamunaan]
brahmāvartaṁ kurukṣetraṁ
[brahmaavartam kurukshetram]
matsyān sārasvatān atha
[matsyaan saarasvataan atha]
maru-dhanvam atikramya
[maru-dhanvam atikramya]
sauvīrābhīrayoḥ parān
[sauveeraabheerayoh paraan]
ānartān bhārgavopāgāc
[aanartaan bhaargavopaagaach]
chrāntavāho manāg vibhuḥ
[chraantavaaho manaag vibhuh]
kuru-jāṅgala — the province of Delhi pāṣcālān — part of the province Pānjab śūrasenān — part of the province of Uttar Pradesh sa — with yāmunān — the districts on the bank of the Yamunā brahmāvartam — part of northern Uttar Pradesh kurukṣetram — the place where the battle was fought matsyān — the province Matsya sārasvatān — part of Punjab atha — and so on maru — Rajasthan, the land of deserts dhanvam — Madhya Pradesh, where water is very scanty ati-kramya — after passing sauvīra — Saurastra ābhīrayoḥ — part of Gujarat parān — western side ānartān — the province of Dvārakā bhārgava — O Śaunaka upāgāt — overtaken by śrānta — fatigue vāhaḥ — the horses manāk vibhuḥ — slightly, because of the long journey.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kuru-jāṅgala-pāṣcālān
kuru-jāṅgala
the province of Delhi
pāṣcālān
part of the province Pānjab
śūrasenān sayāmunān
śūrasenān
part of the province of Uttar Pradesh
sa
with
yāmunān
the districts on the bank of the Yamunā
brahmāvartaṁ kurukṣetraṁ
brahmāvartam
part of northern Uttar Pradesh
kurukṣetram
the place where the battle was fought
matsyān sārasvatān atha
matsyān
the province Matsya
sārasvatān
part of Punjab
atha
and so on
maru-dhanvam atikramya
maru
Rajasthan, the land of deserts
dhanvam
Madhya Pradesh, where water is very scanty
ati-kramya
after passing
sauvīrābhīrayoḥ parān
sauvīra
Saurastra
ābhīrayoḥ
part of Gujarat
parān
western side
ānartān bhārgavopāgāc
ānartān
the province of Dvārakā
bhārgava
O Śaunaka
upāgāt
overtaken by
śrānta
fatigue
chrāntavāho manāg vibhuḥ
vāhaḥ
the horses
manāk vibhuḥ
slightly, because of the long journey.
O Śaunaka, the Lord then proceeded towards Kurujāṅgala, Pāṣcālā, Śūrasenā, the land on the bank of the river Yamunā, Brahmāvarta, Kurukṣetra, Matsya, Sārasvata, the province of the desert and the land of scanty water. After crossing these provinces He gradually reached the Sauvīra and Ābhīra provinces, then, west of these, reached Dvārakā at last.

The provinces passed over by the Lord in those days were differently named, but the direction given is sufficient to indicate that He traveled through Delhi, Punjab, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Saurastra and Gujarat and at last reached His home province at Dvārakā. We do not gain any profit simply by researching the analogous provinces of those days up to now, but it appears that the desert of Rajasthan and the provinces of scanty water like Madhya Pradesh were present even five thousand years ago. The theory of soil experts that the desert developed in recent years is not supported by the statements of Bhāgavatam. We may leave the matter for expert geologists to research because the changing universe has different phases of geological development. We are satisfied that the Lord has now reached His own province, Dvārakā-dhāma, from the Kuru provinces. Kurukṣetra continues to exist since the Vedic age, and it is sheer foolishness when interpreters ignore or deny the existence of Kurukṣetra.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O son of Bhṛgu! Passing through the provinces of Kuru-jāṅgala, Pāṇcāla, and Śūrasena on the banks of the Yamunā River, Brahmāvarta, Kurukṣetra, Matsya, Sārasvata, and the deserts and arid regions, and then Sauvīra and Abhīra, the Lord arrived at Ānarta with slightly tired horses.
Commentary

The places are not listed in proper sequence. Maru is a place without water and dhanva is a place with little water. He arrived at Ānarta, the area of Dvārakā with slightly tired horses (manāk śrānta vāhaḥ).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.10.36

↗
తత్ర తత్ర హ తత్రత్యైర్హరి: ప్రత్యుద్యతార్హణ: । సాయం భేజే దిశం పశ్చాద్గవిష్ఠో గాం గతస్తదా ॥ ౩౬ ॥
tatra tatra ha tatratyair
[tatra tatra ha tatratyair]
hariḥ pratyudyatārhaṇaḥ
[harih pratyudyataarhanah]
sāyaṁ bheje diśaṁ paścād
[saayam bheje disham pashchaad]
gaviṣṭho gāṁ gatas tadā
[gavishtho gaam gatas tadaa]
tatra tatra — at different places ha — it so happened tatratyaiḥ — by local inhabitants hariḥ — the Personality of Godhead pratyudyata-arhaṇaḥ — being offered presentations and worshipful regards sāyam — the evening bheje — having overtaken diśam — direction paścāt — western gaviṣthaḥ — the sun in the sky gām — to the ocean gataḥ — having gone tadā — at that time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra tatra ha tatratyair
tatra tatra
at different places
ha
it so happened
tatratyaiḥ
by local inhabitants
hariḥ pratyudyatārhaṇaḥ
hariḥ
the Personality of Godhead
pratyudyata-arhaṇaḥ
being offered presentations and worshipful regards
sāyaṁ bheje diśaṁ paścād
sāyam
the evening
bheje
having overtaken
diśam
direction
paścāt
western
gaviṣṭho gāṁ gatas tadā
gaviṣthaḥ
the sun in the sky
gām
to the ocean
gataḥ
having gone
tadā
at that time.
On His journey through these provinces He was welcomed, worshiped and given various presentations. In the evening, in all places, the Lord suspended His journey to perform evening rites. This was regularly observed after sunset.

It is said here that the Lord observed the religious principles regularly while He was on the journey. There are certain philosophical speculations that even the Lord is under the obligations of fruitive action. But actually this is not the case. He does not depend on the action of any good or bad work. Since the Lord is absolute, everything done by Him is good for everyone. But when He descends to the earth, He acts for the protection of the devotees and for the annihilation of the impious nondevotees. Although He has no obligatory duty, still He does everything so that others may follow. That is the way of factual teaching; one must act properly himself and teach the same to others, otherwise no one will accept one’s blind teaching. He is Himself the awarder of fruitive results. He is self-sufficient, and yet He acts according to the rulings of the revealed scripture in order to teach us the process. If He does not do so, the common man may go wrong. But in the advanced stage, when one can understand the transcendental nature of the Lord, one does not try to imitate Him. This is not possible.

The Lord in human society does what is the duty of everyone, but sometimes He does something extraordinary and not to be imitated by the living being. His acts of evening prayer as stated herein must be followed by the living being, but it is not possible to follow His mountain-lifting or dancing with the gopīs. One cannot imitate the sun, which can exhaust water even from a filthy place; the most powerful can do something which is all-good, but our imitation of such acts will put us into endless difficulty. Therefore, in all actions, the experienced guide, the spiritual master, who is the manifested mercy of the Lord, should always be consulted, and the path of progress will be assured.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Tenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Departure of Lord Kṛṣṇa for Dvārakā.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
At all the places along the way devotees offered gifts to the Lord. He arrived at Dvārakā in the afternoon. Then the sun entered the western ocean.
Commentary

The states situated on the road from Hastināpura to Dvārakā also worshipped him. The Lord was offered gifts by the devotees living in all those places (tatratyaiḥ) as he proceeded on the road, in order to bring him to their place. To fulfill their desires he went to all these places one after the other and after staying a few days in each place continued on the road. He arrived at Dvārakā (paścād diśam) in the afternoon (sāyam). At that time the sun (gaviṣṭhaḥ) had entered the water (gām) of the western ocean.

Chapter Eleven Kṛṣṇa arrives at Dvārakā

📝 My note