FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

9.2 · The Dynasties of the Sons of Manu

31 verses
D Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16032 chars)

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Ambarish Maharaja worshipped Lord Krishna in a multitude of ways and displayed a unique intensity of spiritual absorption. When his life was threatened by a fiery demon created by Durvasa Muni, he remained entirely undisturbed. To punish Durvasa for his harshness, Lord Vishnu released His Chakra to kill him, and the sage had to literally ‘run for his life.’ After being chased around the universe, Durvasa realised the only recourse was to beg for Ambarish’s forgiveness. The Lord cannot tolerate any offence to His devotees, who are more dear to Him than His own life. These chapters thus describe the Surya Vamsa (descendants of the sun-god, Vivasvan).

Previous D.R.A.G Next Dynasty of Vaivasvata Manu Last updated 1 year ago

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5)

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Ambarish Maharaja worshipped Lord Krishna in a multitude of ways and displayed a unique intensity of spiritual absorption. When his life was threatened by a fiery demon created by Durvasa Muni, he remained entirely undisturbed. To punish Durvasa for his harshness, Lord Vishnu released His Chakra to kill him, and the sage had to literally ‘run for his life.’ After being chased around the universe, Durvasa realised the only recourse was to beg for Ambarish’s forgiveness. The Lord cannot tolerate any offence to His devotees, who are more dear to Him than His own life. These chapters thus describe the Surya Vamsa (descendants of the sun-god, Vivasvan).

Previous D.R.A.G Next Dynasty of Vaivasvata Manu Last updated 1 year ago

Durvasa Forgiven

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Durvasa Forgiven Chapter 5 Durvasa humbly fell at the feet of Ambarish, who was somewhat embarrassed by the sage’s surrender. The King fervently prayed for Sudarshan’s withdrawal, and Durvasa Muni was mercifully spared. Feeling unlimitedly grateful, Durvasa praised Ambarish’s character, amazed at how he was able to overlook all his offences without any grudge whatsoever. Ambarish then served Durvasa Muni with great devotion and finally accepted his own prasadam , having fasted for the entire year that Durvasa was being chased! In his later years, Maharaja Ambarish divided all his property among his sons and retired to the bank of Manasa-sarovara to spiritually immerse himself.

Previous Durvasa Offends Ambarish Next Power and Purity Last updated 1 year ago

Durvasa Offends Ambarish

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Durvasa Offends Ambarish Chapter 4 Another son of Manu was Nabhaga, whose son was Naabhaaga. Due to his absence from the kingdom, he did not receive any of his father’s property. His father, Nabhaga, later guided him on how to obtain wealth from a sacrifice conducted by the descendants of Angira. Naabhaaga had a son named Ambarish, who became famous as a great devotee. Though a fabulously wealthy emperor, Ambarish Maharaja was constantly engaged in devotional service, uninterested in material enjoyment or even liberation. He engaged all his physical and mental faculties in serving the Lord with enthusiasm and, though responsible for the state administration, was an exemplar of pure devotion. The Lord was so pleased with Him that He arranged for the Sudarshan Chakra to always protect him. Once, on a dvadasi day (the day after the ekadasi fasting day), Ambarish was about to break his fast when the great mystic Durvasa Muni suddenly appeared. Ambarish invited his unannounced guest to eat, and Durvasa agreed, but first went to bathe in the Yamuna. Ambarish now faced a dilemma. Durvasa Muni had not returned from his bath, yet the prescribed time for breaking the fast was now upon him. He didn’t want to miss that auspicious time, but neither did he want to eat before serving his guest. To resolve the situation, the sages advised him to drink some water, since this would avoid any violation on both counts; to drink water is to simultaneously eat and not eat. By his mystic power, Durvasa Muni immediately discovered that Ambarish had broken his fast. Without understanding the situation, Durvasa Muni, in a fit of anger, fashioned a ferocious demon to kill Ambarish. In response, the Lord’s lethal Chakra immediately intervened to protect His devotee, vanquishing the fiery demon and chasing Durvasa Muni all over the universe. Powerless to counteract it himself, unsuccessful in enlisting the help of the demigods, and seeing no other recourse, Durvasa surrendered to Narayana in desperation. “I am an offender” he admitted, “Please protect me!” In a series of exquisite verses, the Lord expressed the intense love He has for His devotees, explaining how they know nothing but Him, and He knows nothing but them. The Lord advised Durvasa Muni to seek pardon from Ambarish, for only then would he be redeemed.

Previous Dynasty of Vaivasvata Manu Next Durvasa Forgiven Last updated 1 year ago

Dynasty of Vaivasvata Manu

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Dynasty of Vaivasvata Manu Chapters 1,2,3 After Sukadeva Goswami described Satyavrata, he mentioned that the King reappeared as Vaivasvata Manu (Sraddhadeva). [ 27 ] He then delineated the dynasty of Manu, elaborating on certain individuals within it. Ila (Sudyumna): Devoid of a son, Vaivasvata Manu was guided by Vasistha to perform a sacrifice ( yajna ). During the yajna , however, Vaivasvata Manu’s wife, Sraddha, requested a daughter. When a daughter (Ila) was born, Vasistha prayed that she become a man, and she thus became Sudyumna. Once, when Sudyumna entered a forest which was cursed by Siva, he and his associates all mystically turned into women. After that incident, Sudyumna (Ila) united with Budha and had a son named Pururava. Seeing this astonishing series of events, Vasistha intervened, and with the help of Siva, Sudyumna received the benediction that he would live one month as a woman and one month as a man. He regained his kingdom, had three sons, and eventually entrusted everything to Pururava and retired to the forest. Prsadhra: Still desirous of sons, Vaivasvata Manu begot ten more, one of whom was Prsadhra. Though he was dedicated to protecting cows, one day, while driving away a fierce tiger who had come to attack, he accidentally killed a cow instead of the tiger. He was cursed by his guru to become a sudra , but overcame it through bhakti-yoga and went back to Godhead. Saryati: Once, another son of Manu, Saryati, accompanied his daughter, Sukanya, to the asrama of Cyavana Muni. There, Sukanya saw two luminous substances in the earth and pierced them, unaware that they were the muni’s eyes. Begging forgiveness, Saryati offered his daughter in marriage, and she indeed became an ideal wife. Later, the aged Cyavana Muni was rewarded his lost youth by the Asvini Kumaras. In Saryati’s dynasty comes Revati, the wife of Balarama. Sukadeva Goswami briefly discussed other sons of Manu and their respective descendants.

Previous D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Next Durvasa Offends Ambarish Last updated 1 year ago

Power and Purity

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity “In modern times, there are legislative assemblies whose members are authorised to make laws for the welfare of the state, but according to this description of the kingdom of Maharaja Ambarish, the country or the world should be ruled by a chief executive whose advisors are all devotee brahmanas . Such advisors or members of the legislative assembly should not be professional politicians, nor should they be selected by the ignorant public. Rather, they should be appointed by the king. When the king, the executive head of the state, is a devotee and he follows the instructions of devotee brahmanas in ruling the country, everyone will be peaceful and prosperous. When the king and his advisors are perfect devotees, nothing can be wrong in the state. All the citizens should become devotees of the Lord, and then their good character will automatically follow.” ( SB 9.4.21 ) The modern world has seen a long list of corrupt, devious and manipulative leaders who have exercised the power lent to them for less-than-noble purposes. The famous aphorism comes to mind: “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” People often wonder whether those who are in positions of significant influence can simultaneously be moral, humane and compassionate. Can power and purity coexist? The Srimad-Bhagavatam says “ Yes ” and offers many examples to demonstrate it. Its narrations are replete with examples of saintly kings, known as rajarsis (a Sanskrit term that combines the word raja , meaning ‘king,’ and rsi , meaning ‘saint’), who exemplified this perfect combination. Although endowed with opulence and power, they were simultaneously great sages. Due to the purity of their devotion, their motivations, decisions and actions were completely selfless. They ruled with reference to spiritual wisdom, offering genuine spiritual leadership to steer society in the most progressive way. Modern-day politics, however, devoid of such sacred principles, can easily degrade into a selfish fight for power, prestige, profit and position. Some of the most notable qualities of saintly kings are as follows:

Previous Durvasa Forgiven Next Advisors Last updated 1 year ago

Absorption

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Absorption Simultaneous to being managers and organisers, these saintly kings lived with a very deep realisation of eternity. They were absorbed in devotional service. We hear of how Ambarish engaged all his senses in the service of the Lord: “Maharaja Ambarish always engaged his mind in meditating upon the lotus feet of Krishna, his words in describing the glories of the Lord, his hands in cleansing the Lord’s temple, and his ears in hearing the words spoken by Krishna or about Krishna. He engaged his eyes in seeing the deity of Krishna, Krishna’s temples and Krishna’s places like Mathura and Vrindavana, he engaged his sense of touch in touching the bodies of the Lord’s devotees, he engaged his sense of smell in smelling the fragrance of tulasi offered to the Lord, and he engaged his tongue in tasting the Lord’s prasada. He engaged his legs in walking to the holy places and temples of the Lord, his head in bowing down before the Lord, and all his desires in serving the Lord, twenty-four hours a day. Indeed, Maharaja Ambarish never desired anything for his own sense gratification. He engaged all his senses in devotional service, in various engagements related to the Lord. This is the way to increase attachment for the Lord and be completely free from all material desires.” ( SB 9.4.18-20 ). We also see the example of Pariksit Maharaja, who humbly accepted the curse upon himself, seeing it as an opportunity for spiritual advancement and perfection. He had no regrets or remorse, but saw that Krishna had personally come to him in another form.

Previous Knowledge Next Character Last updated 1 year ago

Advisors

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Advisors The Srimad-Bhagavatam commentator, Sridhara Swami, mentions that every king has seven protectors, of which the spiritual master and informed ministers are two ( SB 6.14.17 ). When these seven are properly maintained, a king flourishes in his service. The Pandavas, for example, often benefitted from the counsel of Narada Muni. Brahminical advisors and spiritual guides would help the kings make effective, practical decisions, which factored in scriptural principles and spiritual wisdom. Their advice would help to resolve the various political and societal dilemmas they were facing. Though the rajarsis were in powerful positions, they never developed a sense of pride which would block them from receiving advice. The Ramayana also narrates how Lord Rama would often be seen sitting with the sages of the forest, receiving spiritual counsel. We see how King Rahugana, when he detected the spiritual advancement of his palanquin carrier, Jada Bharata, was eager to hear spiritual wisdom from him.

Previous Power and Purity Next Knowledge Last updated 1 year ago

Character

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Character In the Ramayana, we hear of how Lord Rama would enlist spies to gather information on how the citizens were feeling about the king and his ruling. When such information would come back, He would use that feedback to refine His character and approach. This is a far cry from modern politics where spin doctors and public relations tycoons are employed to generate false propaganda and cover up any faults that may be there. Saintly kings lived with high principles, thus inspiring all the citizens to do the same. Their spotless integrity generated so much faith in their followers that there was no question of revolution or revolt.

Previous Absorption Next Responsibility Last updated 1 year ago

Knowledge

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Knowledge The saintly kings were fully qualified in the science of government and practical affairs, and thus their kingdoms displayed material prosperity and abundance far beyond anything we see today. Such kings, however, were also well-trained in scriptural knowledge. When King Chitraketu became overwhelmed by material affection, he was enlightened by Angira and Narada. The King was able to escape the dark well of family life, just as an elephant is freed from a muddy pond. In the Bhagavad-gita, Lord Krishna describes how transcendental knowledge was “ passed down through disciplic succession, and the saintly kings understood it in that way. ” Thus, their combined knowledge of material and spiritual helped guide all the citizens on a progressive path.

Previous Advisors Next Absorption Last updated 1 year ago

Responsibility

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Responsibility Though Priyavrata Maharaja was reluctant to leave his renounced life and take up the throne, when his superiors requested him due to the acute need of the day, he accepted it out of duty. When such saintly kings accepted their positions, they took full responsibility for whatever happened in their kingdom. They were never neglectful nor absent-minded. If an anomalous incident took place in the kingdom, the untimely death of a citizen or the appearance of drought and pestilence, then the king would accept full responsibility for it. Indeed, it is said that in the presence of saintly kings, no such anomalies would occur in the kingdom: “When Lord Ramacandra, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, was the King of this world, all bodily and mental suffering, disease, old age, bereavement, lamentation, distress, fear and fatigue were completely absent. There was even no death for those who did not want it.” ( SB 9.10.53 )

Previous Character Next Succession Last updated 1 year ago

Succession

D – Durvasa and Ambarish (1-5) Power and Purity Succession The Srimad-Bhagavatam repeatedly describes how every saintly king was planning for succession. In the material world, leaders cling on to their position until the day they are practically dragged from their seats of power. The rajarsis , however, fully alert to the goal of life, would give up their positions at the opportune time – their detachment would neither be irresponsibly quick, nor needlessly delayed, and they would allow young, fresh and qualified leaders to take up the responsibility. They were able to detach themselves from incredible influence and opulence without any hesitation whatsoever. Indeed, it is said of Bharata Maharaja: “While in the prime of life, the great Maharaja Bharata gave up everything because he was fond of serving the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Uttamasloka. He gave up his beautiful wife, nice children, great friends and an enormous empire. Although these things were very difficult to give up, Maharaja Bharata was so exalted that he gave them up just as one gives up stool after evacuating. Such was the greatness of His Majesty.” ( SB 5.14.43 )

Previous Responsibility Next R – Ramacandra (6-13) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ ఏవం గతేఽథ సుద్యుమ్నే మనుర్వైవస్వత: సుతే । పుత్రకామస్తపస్తేపే యమునాయాం శతం సమా: ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
evaṁ gate ’tha sudyumne
[evam gate ’tha sudyumne]
manur vaivasvataḥ sute
[manur vaivasvatah sute]
putra-kāmas tapas tepe
[putra-kaamas tapas tepe]
yamunāyāṁ śataṁ samāḥ
[yamunaayaam shatam samaah]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said evam — thus gate — had accepted the order of vānaprastha atha — thereafter sudyumne — when Sudyumna manuḥ vaivasvataḥ — Vaivasvata Manu, known as Śrāddhadeva sute — his son putra-kāmaḥ — desiring to get sons tapaḥ tepe — executed severe austerities yamunāyām — on the bank of the Yamunā śatam samāḥ — for one hundred years.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
evaṁ gate ’tha sudyumne
evam
thus
gate
had accepted the order of vānaprastha
manur vaivasvataḥ sute
atha
thereafter
sudyumne
when Sudyumna
putra-kāmas tapas tepe
manuḥ vaivasvataḥ
Vaivasvata Manu, known as Śrāddhadeva
sute
his son
putra-kāmaḥ
desiring to get sons
tapaḥ tepe
executed severe austerities
yamunāyāṁ śataṁ samāḥ
yamunāyām
on the bank of the Yamunā
śatam samāḥ
for one hundred years.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Thereafter, when his son Sudyumna had thus gone to the forest to accept the order of vānaprastha, Vaivasvata Manu [Śrāddhadeva], being desirous of getting more sons, performed severe austerities on the bank of the Yamunā for one hundred years.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Thereafter, when his son Sudyumna had gone to the forest, Vaivasvata Manu [Śrāddhadeva], desirous of getting more sons, performed austerities on the bank of the Yamunā for one hundred years. In the Second Chapter, Vaivasvata Manu’s dynasty is described briefly. Pṛṣadhra, rejected by his guru, does not give him up, and attains the supreme.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.2

↗
తతోఽయజన్మనుర్దేవమపత్యార్థం హరిం ప్రభుమ్ । ఇక్ష్వాకుపూర్వజాన్ పుత్రాన్లేభే స్వసద‍ృశాన్ దశ ॥ ౨ ॥
tato ’yajan manur devam
[tato ’yajan manur devam]
apatyārthaṁ hariṁ prabhum
[apatyaartham harim prabhum]
ikṣvāku-pūrvajān putrān
[ikshvaaku-poorvajaan putraan]
lebhe sva-sadṛśān daśa
[lebhe sva-sadrishaan dasha]
tataḥ — thereafter ayajat — worshiped manuḥ — Vaivasvata Manu devam — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead apatya-artham — with a desire to get sons harim — unto Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead prabhum — the Lord ikṣvāku-pūrva-jān — of whom the eldest was named Ikṣvāku putrān — sons lebhe — got sva-sadṛśān — exactly like himself daśa — ten.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato ’yajan manur devam
tataḥ
thereafter
ayajat
worshiped
manuḥ
Vaivasvata Manu
devam
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead
apatyārthaṁ hariṁ prabhum
apatya-artham
with a desire to get sons
harim
unto Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead
prabhum
the Lord
ikṣvāku-pūrvajān putrān
ikṣvāku-pūrva-jān
of whom the eldest was named Ikṣvāku
putrān
sons
lebhe sva-sadṛśān daśa
lebhe
got
sva-sadṛśān
exactly like himself
daśa
ten.
Then, because of this desire for sons, the Manu known as Śrāddhadeva worshiped the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, the Lord of the demigods. Thus he got ten sons exactly like himself. Among them all, Ikṣvāku was the eldest.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then, because of this desire for sons Śrāddhadeva worshiped the Supreme Lord and obtained ten sons exactly like himself. Among them all, Ikṣvāku was the eldest.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.3

↗
పృషధ్రస్తు మనో: పుత్రో గోపాలో గురుణా కృత: । పాలయామాస గా యత్తో రాత్ర్యాం వీరాసనవ్రత: ॥ ౩ ॥
pṛṣadhras tu manoḥ putro
[prishadhras tu manoh putro]
go-pālo guruṇā kṛtaḥ
[go-paalo gurunaa kritah]
pālayām āsa gā yatto
[paalayaam aasa gaa yatto]
rātryāṁ vīrāsana-vrataḥ
[raatryaam veeraasana-vratah]
pṛṣadhraḥ tu — among them, Pṛṣadhra manoḥ — of Manu putraḥ — the son go-pālaḥ — herding cows guruṇā — by the order of his spiritual master kṛtaḥ — having been engaged pālayām āsa — he protected gāḥ — cows yattaḥ — so engaged rātryām — at night vīrāsana-vrataḥ — taking the vow of vīrāsana, standing with a sword.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pṛṣadhras tu manoḥ putro
pṛṣadhraḥ tu
among them, Pṛṣadhra
manoḥ
of Manu
putraḥ
the son
go-pālo guruṇā kṛtaḥ
go-pālaḥ
herding cows
guruṇā
by the order of his spiritual master
kṛtaḥ
having been engaged
pālayām āsa gā yatto
pālayām āsa
he protected
gāḥ
cows
yattaḥ
so engaged
rātryāṁ vīrāsana-vrataḥ
rātryām
at night
vīrāsana-vrataḥ
taking the vow of vīrāsana, standing with a sword.
Among these sons, Pṛṣadhra, following the order of his spiritual master, was engaged as a protector of cows. He would stand all night with a sword to give the cows protection.

One who becomes vīrāsana takes the vow to stand all night with a sword to give protection to the cows. Because Pṛṣadhra was engaged in this way, it is to be understood that he had no dynasty. We can further understand from this vow accepted by Pṛṣadhra how essential it is to protect the cows. Some son of a kṣatriya would take this vow to protect the cows from ferocious animals, even at night. What then is to be said of sending cows to slaughterhouses? This is the most sinful activity in human society.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Among these sons, Pṛṣadhra, following the order of his guru, was engaged as a protector of cows. He would stand all night with a sword with great attention. Pṛṣadhra had no descendents. The reason is explained. Khaḍga-pāṇeḥ means he would stay awake all night with a sword in his hand. Yattḥaḥ means with attention.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.4

↗
ఏకదా ప్రావిశద్ గోష్ఠం శార్దూలో నిశి వర్షతి । శయానా గావ ఉత్థాయ భీతాస్తా బభ్రముర్వ్రజే ॥ ౪ ॥
ekadā prāviśad goṣṭhaṁ
[ekadaa praavishad goshtham]
śārdūlo niśi varṣati
[shaardoolo nishi varshati]
śayānā gāva utthāya
[shayaanaa gaava utthaaya]
bhītās tā babhramur vraje
[bheetaas taa babhramur vraje]
ekadā — once upon a time prāviśat — entered goṣṭham — the land of the cowshed śārdūlaḥ — a tiger niśi — at night varṣati — while it was raining śayānāḥ — lying down gāvaḥ — cows utthāya — getting up bhītāḥ — fearing tāḥ — all of them babhramuḥ — scattered here and there vraje — in the land surrounding the cowshed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekadā prāviśad goṣṭhaṁ
ekadā
once upon a time
prāviśat
entered
goṣṭham
the land of the cowshed
śārdūlo niśi varṣati
śārdūlaḥ
a tiger
niśi
at night
varṣati
while it was raining
śayānā gāva utthāya
śayānāḥ
lying down
gāvaḥ
cows
utthāya
getting up
bhītās tā babhramur vraje
bhītāḥ
fearing
tāḥ
all of them
babhramuḥ
scattered here and there
vraje
in the land surrounding the cowshed.
Once at night, while it was raining, a tiger entered the land of the cowshed. Upon seeing the tiger, all the cows, who were lying down, got up in fear and scattered here and there on the land.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One time at night a tiger entered the cowshed. Upon seeing the tiger, all the cows, which were lying down, got up in fear and scattered here and there in the pen.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.5-6

↗
ఏకాం జగ్రాహ బలవాన్ సా చుక్రోశ భయాతురా । తస్యాస్తు క్రన్దితం శ్రుత్వా పృషధ్రోఽనుససార హ ॥ ౫ ॥ ఖడ్‌గమాదాయ తరసా ప్రలీనోడుగణే నిశి । అజానన్నచ్ఛినోద్ బభ్రో: శిర: శార్దూలశఙ్కయా ॥ ౬ ॥
ekāṁ jagrāha balavān
[ekaam jagraaha balavaan]
sā cukrośa bhayāturā
[saa chukrosha bhayaaturaa]
tasyās tu kranditaṁ śrutvā
[tasyaas tu kranditam shrutvaa]
pṛṣadhro ’nusasāra ha
[prishadhro ’nusasaara ha]
khaḍgam ādāya tarasā
[khadgam aadaaya tarasaa]
pralīnoḍu-gaṇe niśi
[praleenodu-gane nishi]
ajānann acchinod babhroḥ
[ajaanann achchinod babhroh]
śiraḥ śārdūla-śaṅkayā
[shirah shaardoola-shankayaa]
ekām — one of the cows jagrāha — seized balavān — the strong tiger sā — that cow cukrośa — began to cry bhaya-āturā — in distress and fear tasyāḥ — of her tu — but kranditam — the screaming śrutvā — hearing pṛṣadhraḥ — Pṛṣadhra anusasāra ha — followed khaḍgam — sword ādāya — taking tarasā — very hastily pralīna-uḍu-gaṇe — when the stars were covered by clouds niśi — at night ajānan — without knowledge acchinot — cut off babhroḥ — of the cow śiraḥ — the head śārdūla-śaṅkayā — mistaking it for the head of the tiger.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekāṁ jagrāha balavān
ekām
one of the cows
jagrāha
seized
balavān
the strong tiger
sā cukrośa bhayāturā
sā
that cow
cukrośa
began to cry
bhaya-āturā
in distress and fear
tasyās tu kranditaṁ śrutvā
tasyāḥ
of her
tu
but
kranditam
the screaming
śrutvā
hearing
pṛṣadhro ’nusasāra ha
pṛṣadhraḥ
Pṛṣadhra
khaḍgam ādāya tarasā
pralīnoḍu-gaṇe niśi
anusasāra ha
followed
khaḍgam
sword
ādāya
taking
tarasā
very hastily
pralīna-uḍu-gaṇe
when the stars were covered by clouds
niśi
at night
ajānann acchinod babhroḥ
ajānan
without knowledge
acchinot
cut off
babhroḥ
of the cow
śiraḥ śārdūla-śaṅkayā
śiraḥ
the head
śārdūla-śaṅkayā
mistaking it for the head of the tiger.
When the very strong tiger seized the cow, the cow screamed in distress and fear, and Pṛṣadhra, hearing the screaming, immediately followed the sound. He took up his sword, but because the stars were covered by clouds, he mistook the cow for the tiger and mistakenly cut off the cows’ head with great force.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the very strong tiger seized a cow, the cow screamed in distress and fear, and Pṛṣadhra, hearing the screaming, immediately followed the sound. He took up his sword, but because the stars were covered by clouds, he mistook the cow for the tiger and mistakenly cut off the cows' head with great force. Because clouds covered the star, he mistook a cow for the tiger.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.7

↗
వ్యాఘ్రోఽపి వృక్ణశ్రవణో నిస్త్రింశాగ్రాహతస్తత: । నిశ్చక్రామ భృశం భీతో రక్తం పథి సముత్సృజన్ ॥ ౭ ॥
vyāghro ’pi vṛkṇa-śravaṇo
[vyaaghro ’pi vrikna-shravano]
nistriṁśāgrāhatas tataḥ
[nistrimshaagraahatas tatah]
niścakrāma bhṛśaṁ bhīto
[nishchakraama bhrisham bheeto]
raktaṁ pathi samutsṛjan
[raktam pathi samutsrijan]
vyāghraḥ — the tiger api — also vṛkṇa-śravaṇaḥ — its ear being cut off nistriṁśa-agra-āhataḥ — because of being cut by the tip of the sword tataḥ — thereafter niścakrāma — fled (from that place) bhṛśam — very much bhītaḥ — being afraid raktam — blood pathi — on the road samutsṛjan — discharging.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyāghro ’pi vṛkṇa-śravaṇo
vyāghraḥ
the tiger
api
also
vṛkṇa-śravaṇaḥ
its ear being cut off
nistriṁśāgrāhatas tataḥ
nistriṁśa-agra-āhataḥ
because of being cut by the tip of the sword
tataḥ
thereafter
niścakrāma bhṛśaṁ bhīto
niścakrāma
fled (from that place)
bhṛśam
very much
bhītaḥ
being afraid
raktaṁ pathi samutsṛjan
raktam
blood
pathi
on the road
samutsṛjan
discharging.
Because the tiger’s ear had been cut by the edge of the sword, the tiger was very afraid, and it fled from that place, while bleeding on the street.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because the tiger's ear had been cut by the edge of the sword, the tiger fled in great fear from that place, while bleeding on the path. The tiger’s ear was cut by the striking of the tip of his sword.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.8

↗
మన్యమానో హతం వ్యాఘ్రం పృషధ్ర: పరవీరహా । అద్రాక్షీత్ స్వహతాం బభ్రుం వ్యుష్టాయాం నిశి దు:ఖిత: ॥ ౮ ॥
manyamāno hataṁ vyāghraṁ
[manyamaano hatam vyaaghram]
pṛṣadhraḥ para-vīra-hā
[prishadhrah para-veera-haa]
adrākṣīt sva-hatāṁ babhruṁ
[adraaksheet sva-hataam babhrum]
vyuṣṭāyāṁ niśi duḥkhitaḥ
[vyushtaayaam nishi duhkhitah]
manyamānaḥ — thinking that hatam — has been killed vyāghram — the tiger pṛṣadhraḥ — Manu’s son Pṛṣadhra para-vīra-hā — although quite able to punish the enemy adrākṣīt — saw sva-hatām — had been killed by him babhrum — the cow vyuṣṭāyām niśi — when the night had passed (in the morning) duḥkhitaḥ — became very much unhappy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
manyamāno hataṁ vyāghraṁ
manyamānaḥ
thinking that
hatam
has been killed
vyāghram
the tiger
pṛṣadhraḥ para-vīra-hā
pṛṣadhraḥ
Manu’s son Pṛṣadhra
para-vīra-hā
although quite able to punish the enemy
adrākṣīt sva-hatāṁ babhruṁ
adrākṣīt
saw
sva-hatām
had been killed by him
babhrum
the cow
vyuṣṭāyāṁ niśi duḥkhitaḥ
vyuṣṭāyām niśi
when the night had passed (in the morning)
duḥkhitaḥ
became very much unhappy.
In the morning, when Pṛṣadhra, who was quite able to subdue his enemy, saw that he had killed the cow although at night he thought he had killed the tiger, he was very unhappy.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the morning, when Pṛṣadhra, who was quite able to subdue his enemy, saw that he had killed the cow although at night he thought he had killed the tiger, he was very unhappy. Vyuṣṭāyām means “when night passed.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.9

↗
తం శశాప కులాచార్య: కృతాగసమకామత: । న క్షత్రబన్ధు: శూద్రస్త్వం కర్మణా భవితామునా ॥ ౯ ॥
taṁ śaśāpa kulācāryaḥ
[tam shashaapa kulaachaaryah]
kṛtāgasam akāmataḥ
[kritaagasam akaamatah]
na kṣatra-bandhuḥ śūdras tvaṁ
[na kshatra-bandhuh shoodras tvam]
karmaṇā bhavitāmunā
[karmanaa bhavitaamunaa]
tam — him (Pṛṣadhra) śaśāpa — cursed kula-ācāryaḥ — the family priest, Vasiṣṭha kṛta-āgasam — because of committing the great sin of killing a cow akāmataḥ — although he did not want to do it na — not kṣatra-bandhuḥ — the family member of a kṣatriya śūdraḥ tvam — you have behaved like a śūdra karmaṇā — therefore by your fruitive reaction bhavitā — you shall become a śūdra amunā — because of killing the cow.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ śaśāpa kulācāryaḥ
tam
him (Pṛṣadhra)
śaśāpa
cursed
kula-ācāryaḥ
the family priest, Vasiṣṭha
kṛtāgasam akāmataḥ
kṛta-āgasam
because of committing the great sin of killing a cow
akāmataḥ
although he did not want to do it
na kṣatra-bandhuḥ śūdras tvaṁ
na
not
kṣatra-bandhuḥ
the family member of a kṣatriya
śūdraḥ tvam
you have behaved like a śūdra
karmaṇā bhavitāmunā
karmaṇā
therefore by your fruitive reaction
bhavitā
you shall become a śūdra
amunā
because of killing the cow.
Although Pṛṣadhra had committed the sin unknowingly, his family priest, Vasiṣṭha, cursed him, saying, “In your next life you shall not be able to become a kṣatriya. Instead, you shall take birth as a śūdra because of killing the cow.”

It appears that Vasiṣṭha was not free from tamo-guṇa, the mode of ignorance. As the family priest or spiritual master of Pṛṣadhra, Vasiṣṭha should have taken Pṛṣadhra’s offense very lightly, but instead Vasiṣṭha cursed him to become a śūdra. It is the duty of a family priest not to curse a disciple but to give him relief through the performance of some sort of atonement. Vasiṣṭha, however, did just the opposite. Therefore Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura says that he was durmati; in other words, his intelligence was not very good.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Although Pṛṣadhra had committed the sin unknowingly, his family priest, Vasiṣṭha, cursed him, saying, "In your next life you shall not be able to become a fallen kṣatriya. Instead, you shall take birth as a śūdra." The guru cursed him though he killed the cow unintentionally (akāmataḥ). He did not give instructions on atonement, but out of anger cursed him because his intelligence had disappeared. That is because the actions of a family priest are subject to great ignorance. Viśvarūpa expressed this as follows: akiṣcanānāṁ hi dhanaṁ śiloṣchanaṁ teneha nirvartita-sādhu-satkriyaḥ kathaṁ vigarhyaṁ nu karomy adhīśvarāḥ paurodhasaṁ hṛṣyati yena durmatiḥ Those who are detached maintain themselves honestly by collecting grains left in the harvested field, or left on the grain market floor. O rulers! How can I take up the condemned profession of a priest which gives joy only to the foolish?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.10

↗
ఏవం శప్తస్తు గురుణా ప్రత్యగృహ్ణాత్ కృతాఞ్జలి: । అధారయద్ వ్రతం వీర ఊర్ధ్వరేతా మునిప్రియమ్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
evaṁ śaptas tu guruṇā
[evam shaptas tu gurunaa]
pratyagṛhṇāt kṛtāṣjaliḥ
[pratyagrihnaat kritaashjalih]
adhārayad vrataṁ vīra
[adhaarayad vratam veera]
ūrdhva-retā muni-priyam
[oordhva-retaa muni-priyam]
evam — in this way śaptaḥ — having been cursed tu — but guruṇā — by his spiritual master pratyagṛhṇāt — he (Pṛṣadhra) accepted kṛta-aṣjaliḥ — with folded hands adhārayat — took up, assumed vratam — the vow of brahmacarya vīraḥ — that hero ūrdhva-retāḥ — having controlled his senses muni-priyam — which is approved by the great sages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ śaptas tu guruṇā
evam
in this way
śaptaḥ
having been cursed
tu
but
guruṇā
by his spiritual master
pratyagṛhṇāt kṛtāṣjaliḥ
pratyagṛhṇāt
he (Pṛṣadhra) accepted
kṛta-aṣjaliḥ
with folded hands
adhārayad vrataṁ vīra
adhārayat
took up, assumed
vratam
the vow of brahmacarya
vīraḥ
that hero
ūrdhva-retā muni-priyam
ūrdhva-retāḥ
having controlled his senses
muni-priyam
which is approved by the great sages.
When the hero Pṛṣadhra was thus cursed by his spiritual master, he accepted the curse with folded hands. Then, having controlled his senses, he took the vow of brahmacarya, which is approved by all great sages.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the hero Pṛṣadhra was thus cursed by his guru, he accepted the curse with folded hands. Controlling his senses, he took the vow of brahmacarya. With folded hands he accepted the curse as mercy. He had devotion to guru. He did not say “Why did uselessly you curse me without reflecting first?” Though cursed by his guru, remaining faithful to guru, he attained liberation without obstacles. That is the lesson of this story. Muni-priyam means a vow of celibacy.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.11-13

↗
వాసుదేవే భగవతి సర్వాత్మని పరేఽమలే । ఏకాన్తిత్వం గతో భక్త్యా సర్వభూతసుహృత్ సమ: ॥ ౧౧ ॥ విముక్తసఙ్గ: శాన్తాత్మా సంయతాక్షోఽపరిగ్రహ: । యద‍ృచ్ఛయోపపన్నేన కల్పయన్ వృత్తిమాత్మన: ॥ ౧౨ ॥ ఆత్మన్యాత్మానమాధాయ జ్ఞానతృప్త: సమాహిత: । విచచార మహీమేతాం జడాన్ధబధిరాకృతి: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
vāsudeve bhagavati
[vaasudeve bhagavati]
sarvātmani pare ’male
[sarvaatmani pare ’male]
ekāntitvaṁ gato bhaktyā
[ekaantitvam gato bhaktyaa]
sarva-bhūta-suhṛt samaḥ
[sarva-bhoota-suhrit samah]
vimukta-saṅgaḥ śāntātmā
[vimukta-sangah shaantaatmaa]
saṁyatākṣo ’parigrahaḥ
[samyataaksho ’parigrahah]
yad-ṛcchayopapannena
[yad-richchayopapannena]
kalpayan vṛttim ātmanaḥ
[kalpayan vrittim aatmanah]
ātmany ātmānam ādhāya
[aatmany aatmaanam aadhaaya]
jṣāna-tṛptaḥ samāhitaḥ
[jshaana-triptah samaahitah]
vicacāra mahīm etāṁ
[vichachaara maheem etaam]
jaḍāndha-badhirākṛtiḥ
[jadaandha-badhiraakritih]
vāsudeve — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead bhagavati — unto the Lord sarva-ātmani — unto the Supersoul pare — unto the Transcendence amale — unto the Supreme person, who is without material contamination ekāntitvam — rendering devotional service without diversion gataḥ — being situated in that position bhaktyā — because of pure devotion sarva-bhūta-suhṛt samaḥ — because of being a devotee, friendly and equal to everyone vimukta-saṅgaḥ — without material contamination śānta-ātmā — a peaceful attitude saṁyata — self-controlled akṣaḥ — the vision of whom aparigrahaḥ — without accepting any charity from anyone else yat-ṛcchayā — by the grace of the Lord upapannena — by whatever was available for bodily necessities kalpayan — in this way arranging vṛttim — the necessities of the body ātmanaḥ — for the benefit of the soul ātmani — within the mind ātmānam — the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead ādhāya — keeping always jṣāna-tṛptaḥ — fully satisfied in transcendental knowledge samāhitaḥ — always in trance vicacāra — traveled all over mahīm — the earth etām — this jaḍa — dumb andha — blind badhira — deaf ākṛtiḥ — appearing as if.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vāsudeve bhagavati
vāsudeve
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead
bhagavati
unto the Lord
sarvātmani pare ’male
sarva-ātmani
unto the Supersoul
pare
unto the Transcendence
ekāntitvaṁ gato bhaktyā
amale
unto the Supreme person, who is without material contamination
ekāntitvam
rendering devotional service without diversion
gataḥ
being situated in that position
bhaktyā
because of pure devotion
sarva-bhūta-suhṛt samaḥ
sarva-bhūta-suhṛt samaḥ
because of being a devotee, friendly and equal to everyone
vimukta-saṅgaḥ śāntātmā
vimukta-saṅgaḥ
without material contamination
śānta-ātmā
a peaceful attitude
saṁyata
self-controlled
saṁyatākṣo ’parigrahaḥ
akṣaḥ
the vision of whom
yad-ṛcchayopapannena
aparigrahaḥ
without accepting any charity from anyone else
kalpayan vṛttim ātmanaḥ
yat-ṛcchayā
by the grace of the Lord
upapannena
by whatever was available for bodily necessities
kalpayan
in this way arranging
vṛttim
the necessities of the body
ātmanaḥ
for the benefit of the soul
ātmany ātmānam ādhāya
ātmani
within the mind
ātmānam
the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead
ādhāya
keeping always
jṣāna-tṛptaḥ samāhitaḥ
jṣāna-tṛptaḥ
fully satisfied in transcendental knowledge
samāhitaḥ
always in trance
vicacāra mahīm etāṁ
vicacāra
traveled all over
mahīm
the earth
etām
this
jaḍāndha-badhirākṛtiḥ
jaḍa
dumb
andha
blind
badhira
deaf
ākṛtiḥ
appearing as if.
Thereafter, Pṛṣadhra gained relief from all responsibilities, became peaceful in mind, and established control over all his senses. Being unaffected by material conditions, being pleased with whatever was available by the grace of the Lord to maintain body and soul together, and being equal toward everyone, he gave full attention to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva, who is the transcendental Supersoul, free from material contamination. Thus Pṛṣadhra, fully satisfied in pure knowledge, always keeping his mind on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, achieved pure devotional service to the Lord and began traveling all over the world, without affection for material activities, as if he were deaf, dumb and blind.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Fixing himself with complete devotion on pure Lord Vāsudeva, the antaryāmī, becoming the friend of all beings, seeing them all equally, becoming detached from material life, controlling his mind and senses, not accepting charity from anyone, subsisting on whatever came of its own accord, fixing his mind on the Lord, and satisfied with knowledge, he traveled over the earth as if dumb, blind and deaf. He fixed his mind (ātmanam) on the Lord (ātmani). He was satisfied with knowledge (and did not engage in it anymore), but was not fully satisfied with bhakti, wanting more and more.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.14

↗
ఏవం వృత్తో వనం గత్వా దృష్ట్వా దావాగ్నిముత్థితమ్ । తేనోపయుక్తకరణో బ్రహ్మ ప్రాప పరం ముని: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
evaṁ vṛtto vanaṁ gatvā
[evam vritto vanam gatvaa]
dṛṣṭvā dāvāgnim utthitam
[drishtvaa daavaagnim utthitam]
tenopayukta-karaṇo
[tenopayukta-karano]
brahma prāpa paraṁ muniḥ
[brahma praapa param munih]
evam vṛttaḥ — being situated in such an order of life vanam — to the forest gatvā — after going dṛṣṭvā — when he saw dāva-agnim — a forest fire utthitam — existing there tena — by that (fire) upayukta-karaṇaḥ — engaging all the senses of the body by burning brahma — transcendence prāpa — he achieved param — the ultimate goal muniḥ — as a great saintly person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vṛtto vanaṁ gatvā
evam vṛttaḥ
being situated in such an order of life
vanam
to the forest
gatvā
after going
dṛṣṭvā dāvāgnim utthitam
dṛṣṭvā
when he saw
dāva-agnim
a forest fire
utthitam
existing there
tenopayukta-karaṇo
tena
by that (fire)
upayukta-karaṇaḥ
engaging all the senses of the body by burning
brahma prāpa paraṁ muniḥ
brahma
transcendence
prāpa
he achieved
param
the ultimate goal
muniḥ
as a great saintly person.
With this attitude, Pṛṣadhra became a great saint, and when he entered the forest and saw a blazing forest fire, he took this opportunity to burn his body in the fire. Thus he achieved the transcendental, spiritual world.

The Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (4.9) :

janma karma ca me divyam evaṁ yo vetti tattvataḥ tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti so ’rjuna

“One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna.” Pṛṣadhra, because of his karma, was cursed to take his next birth as a śūdra, but because he took to saintly life, specifically concentrating his mind always upon the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he became a pure devotee. Immediately after giving up his body in the fire, he reached the spiritual world, as mentioned in Bhagavad-gītā ( mām eti ), as a result of his devotional situation. Devotional service performed by thinking of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is so powerful that although Pṛṣadhra was cursed he avoided the terrible consequence of becoming a śūdra and instead returned home, back to Godhead. As stated in Brahma-saṁhitā (5.54) :

yas tv indra-gopam athavendram aho sva-karma- bandhānurūpa-phala-bhājanam ātanoti karmāṇi nirdahati kintu ca bhakti-bhājāṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

Those who engage in devotional service are unaffected by the results of their material activities. Otherwise, everyone, from the smallest microbe up to the King of heaven, Indra, is subject to the laws of karma. A pure devotee, being always engaged in the service of the Lord, is exempt from these laws.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With this way of life, Pṛṣadhra, having entered the forest, saw a blazing forest fire, which had arisen there. The sage, having burned up his body in the fire, achieved Kṛṣṇa. Upayyukta-karaṇaḥ means he burned up his body. Param brahma means Kṛṣṇa.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.15

↗
కవి: కనీయాన్ విషయేషు ని:స్పృహో విసృజ్య రాజ్యం సహ బన్ధుభిర్వనమ్ । నివేశ్య చిత్తే పురుషం స్వరోచిషం వివేశ కైశోరవయా: పరం గత: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
kaviḥ kanīyān viṣayeṣu niḥspṛho
[kavih kaneeyaan vishayeshu nihspriho]
visṛjya rājyaṁ saha bandhubhir vanam
[visrijya raajyam saha bandhubhir vanam]
niveśya citte puruṣaṁ sva-rociṣaṁ
[niveshya chitte purusham sva-rochisham]
viveśa kaiśora-vayāḥ paraṁ gataḥ
[vivesha kaishora-vayaah param gatah]
kaviḥ — another son, known as Kavi kanīyān — who was the youngest viṣayeṣu — in material enjoyments niḥspṛhaḥ — being without attachment visṛjya — after giving up rājyam — his father’s property, the kingdom saha bandhubhiḥ — accompanied by friends vanam — the forest niveśya — keeping always citte — within the core of the heart puruṣam — the Supreme Person sva-rociṣam — self-effulgent viveśa — entered kaiśora-vayāḥ — a young man not fully in youth param — the transcendental world gataḥ — entered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaviḥ kanīyān viṣayeṣu niḥspṛho
kaviḥ
another son, known as Kavi
kanīyān
who was the youngest
viṣayeṣu
in material enjoyments
niḥspṛhaḥ
being without attachment
visṛjya rājyaṁ saha bandhubhir vanam
visṛjya
after giving up
rājyam
his father’s property, the kingdom
saha bandhubhiḥ
accompanied by friends
vanam
the forest
niveśya citte puruṣaṁ sva-rociṣaṁ
niveśya
keeping always
citte
within the core of the heart
puruṣam
the Supreme Person
sva-rociṣam
self-effulgent
viveśa kaiśora-vayāḥ paraṁ gataḥ
viveśa
entered
kaiśora-vayāḥ
a young man not fully in youth
param
the transcendental world
gataḥ
entered.
Being reluctant to accept material enjoyment, Manu’s youngest son, whose name was Kavi, gave up the kingdom before attaining full youth. Accompanied by his friends, he went to the forest, always thinking of the self-effulgent Supreme Personality of Godhead within the core of his heart. Thus he attained perfection.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being reluctant to accept material enjoyment, Manu's youngest son, whose name was Kavi, gave up the kingdom, and when still of kaiśora age, went to the forest with his friends. Thinking of the self-effulgent Supreme Lord within the core of his heart, he attained the Lord. Kavi also had no descendents. He gave up the kingdom with his friends and entered the forest.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.16

↗
కరూషోన్మానవాదాసన్ కారూషో: క్షత్రజాతయ: । ఉత్తరాపథగోప్తారో బ్రహ్మణ్యా ధర్మవత్సలా: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
karūṣān mānavād āsan
[karooshaan maanavaad aasan]
kārūṣāḥ kṣatra-jātayaḥ
[kaarooshaah kshatra-jaatayah]
uttarā-patha-goptāro
[uttaraa-patha-goptaaro]
brahmaṇyā dharma-vatsalāḥ
[brahmanyaa dharma-vatsalaah]
karūṣāt — from Karūṣa mānavāt — from the son of Manu āsan — there was kārūṣāḥ — called the Kārūṣas kṣatra-jātayaḥ — a group of kṣatriyas uttarā — northern patha — of the direction goptāraḥ — kings brahmaṇyāḥ — celebrated protectors of the brahminical culture dharma-vatsalāḥ — extremely religious.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
karūṣān mānavād āsan
karūṣāt
from Karūṣa
mānavāt
from the son of Manu
āsan
there was
kārūṣāḥ kṣatra-jātayaḥ
kārūṣāḥ
called the Kārūṣas
kṣatra-jātayaḥ
a group of kṣatriyas
uttarā-patha-goptāro
uttarā
northern
patha
of the direction
goptāraḥ
kings
brahmaṇyā dharma-vatsalāḥ
brahmaṇyāḥ
celebrated protectors of the brahminical culture
dharma-vatsalāḥ
extremely religious.
From Karūṣa, another son of Manu, came the Kārūṣa dynasty, a family of kṣatriyas. The Kārūṣa kṣatriyas were the kings of the northern direction. They were celebrated protectors of brahminical culture and were all firmly religious.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Karūṣa, another son of Manu, came the Kārūṣa dynasty, a family of kṣatriyas. The Kārūṣa kṣatriyas, ruling the northern direction, were protectors of brahminical culture and were all firmly religious.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.17

↗
ధృష్టాద్ ధార్ష్టమభూత్ క్షత్రం బ్రహ్మభూయం గతం క్షితౌ । నృగస్య వంశ: సుమతిర్భూతజ్యోతిస్తతో వసు: ॥ ౧౭ ॥
dhṛṣṭād dhārṣṭam abhūt kṣatraṁ
[dhrishtaad dhaarshtam abhoot kshatram]
brahma-bhūyaṁ gataṁ kṣitau
[brahma-bhooyam gatam kshitau]
nṛgasya vaṁśaḥ sumatir
[nrigasya vamshah sumatir]
bhūtajyotis tato vasuḥ
[bhootajyotis tato vasuh]
dhṛṣṭāt — from Dhṛṣṭa, another son of Manu dhārṣṭam — a caste of the name Dhārṣṭa abhūt — was produced kṣatram — belonging to the kṣatriya group brahma-bhūyam — the position of brāhmaṇas gatam — had achieved kṣitau — on the surface of the world nṛgasya — of Nṛga, another son of Manu vaṁśaḥ — the dynasty sumatiḥ — of the name Sumati bhūtajyotiḥ — of the name Bhūtajyoti tataḥ — thereafter vasuḥ — by the name Vasu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhṛṣṭād dhārṣṭam abhūt kṣatraṁ
dhṛṣṭāt
from Dhṛṣṭa, another son of Manu
dhārṣṭam
a caste of the name Dhārṣṭa
abhūt
was produced
kṣatram
belonging to the kṣatriya group
brahma-bhūyaṁ gataṁ kṣitau
brahma-bhūyam
the position of brāhmaṇas
gatam
had achieved
kṣitau
on the surface of the world
nṛgasya vaṁśaḥ sumatir
nṛgasya
of Nṛga, another son of Manu
vaṁśaḥ
the dynasty
sumatiḥ
of the name Sumati
bhūtajyotis tato vasuḥ
bhūtajyotiḥ
of the name Bhūtajyoti
tataḥ
thereafter
vasuḥ
by the name Vasu.
From the son of Manu named Dhṛṣṭa came a kṣatriya caste called Dhārṣṭa, whose members achieved the position of brāhmaṇas in this world. Then, from the son of Manu named Nṛga came Sumati. From Sumati came Bhūtajyoti, and from Bhūtajyoti came Vasu.

Here it is said, kṣatraṁ brahma-bhūyaṁ gataṁ kṣitau: although the Dhārṣṭas belonged to the kṣatriya caste, they were able to convert themselves into brāhmaṇas. This gives clear evidence supporting the following statement by Nārada ( Bhāg. 7.11.35 ):

yasya yal lakṣaṇaṁ proktaṁ puṁso varṇābhivyaṣjakam yad anyatrāpi dṛśyeta tat tenaiva vinirdiśet

If the qualities of one group are found in the men of another, those men should be recognized by their qualities, by their symptoms, not by the caste of the family in which they were born. Birth is not at all important; it is one’s qualities that are stressed in all Vedic literature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the son of Manu named Dhṛṣṭa came a kṣatriya caste called Dhārṣṭa, whose members achieved the position of brāhmaṇas in this world. Then, from the son of Manu named Nṛga came Sumati. From Sumati came Bhūtajyoti, and from Bhūtajyoti came Vasu. Brahma-bhūyam means they attained the position of brāhmaṇas. Nṛgasya vaṁśaḥ means son of Nṛga.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.18

↗
వసో: ప్రతీకస్తత్పుత్ర ఓఘవానోఘవత్పితా । కన్యా చౌఘవతీ నామ సుదర్శన ఉవాహ తామ్ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
vasoḥ pratīkas tat-putra
[vasoh prateekas tat-putra]
oghavān oghavat-pitā
[oghavaan oghavat-pitaa]
kanyā caughavatī nāma
[kanyaa chaughavatee naama]
sudarśana uvāha tām
[sudarshana uvaaha taam]
vasoḥ — of Vasu pratīkaḥ — named Pratīka tat-putraḥ — his son oghavān — named Oghavān oghavat-pitā — who was the father of Oghavān kanyā — his daughter ca — also oghavatī — Oghavatī nāma — by the name sudarśanaḥ — Sudarśana uvāha — married tām — that daughter (Oghavatī).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vasoḥ pratīkas tat-putra
vasoḥ
of Vasu
pratīkaḥ
named Pratīka
tat-putraḥ
his son
oghavān oghavat-pitā
oghavān
named Oghavān
oghavat-pitā
who was the father of Oghavān
kanyā caughavatī nāma
kanyā
his daughter
ca
also
oghavatī
Oghavatī
nāma
by the name
sudarśana uvāha tām
sudarśanaḥ
Sudarśana
uvāha
married
tām
that daughter (Oghavatī).
The son of Vasu was Pratīka, whose son was Oghavān. Oghavān’s son was also known as Oghavān, and his daughter was Oghavatī. Sudarśana married that daughter.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Vasu was Pratīka, whose son was Oghavān. Oghavān's son was also known as Oghavān, and his daughter was Oghavatī. Sudarśana married that daughter. Oghavat-pitā means “whose father was Oghavān.” Thus the son was also named Oghavān.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.19

↗
చిత్రసేనో నరిష్యన్తాద‍ృక్షస్తస్య సుతోఽభవత్ । తస్య మీఢ్‍వాంస్తత: పూర్ణ ఇన్ద్రసేనస్తు తత్సుత: ॥ ౧౯ ॥
citraseno nariṣyantād
[chitraseno narishyantaad]
ṛkṣas tasya suto ’bhavat
[rikshas tasya suto ’bhavat]
tasya mīḍhvāṁs tataḥ pūrṇa
[tasya meedhvaams tatah poorna]
indrasenas tu tat-sutaḥ
[indrasenas tu tat-sutah]
citrasenaḥ — one named Citrasena nariṣyantāt — from Nariṣyanta, another son of Manu ṛkṣaḥ — Ṛkṣa tasya — of Citrasena sutaḥ — the son abhavat — became tasya — of him (Ṛkṣa) mīḍhvān — Mīḍhvān tataḥ — from him (Mīḍhvān) pūrṇaḥ — Pūrṇa indrasenaḥ — Indrasena tu — but tat-sutaḥ — the son of him (Pūrṇa).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
citraseno nariṣyantād
citrasenaḥ
one named Citrasena
nariṣyantāt
from Nariṣyanta, another son of Manu
ṛkṣas tasya suto ’bhavat
ṛkṣaḥ
Ṛkṣa
tasya
of Citrasena
sutaḥ
the son
abhavat
became
tasya mīḍhvāṁs tataḥ pūrṇa
tasya
of him (Ṛkṣa)
mīḍhvān
Mīḍhvān
tataḥ
from him (Mīḍhvān)
pūrṇaḥ
Pūrṇa
indrasenas tu tat-sutaḥ
indrasenaḥ
Indrasena
tu
but
tat-sutaḥ
the son of him (Pūrṇa).
From Nariṣyanta came a son named Citrasena and from him a son named Ṛkṣa. From Ṛkṣa came Mīḍhvān, from Mīḍhvān came Pūrṇa, and from Pūrṇa came Indrasena.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Nariṣyanta (another son of Manu) came a son named Citrasena and from him a son named Ṛkṣa. From Ṛkṣa came Mīḍhvān, from Mīḍhvān came Pūrṇa, and from Pūrṇa came Indrasena.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.20

↗
వీతిహోత్రస్త్విన్ద్రసేనాత్ తస్య సత్యశ్రవా అభూత్ । ఉరుశ్రవా: సుతస్తస్య దేవదత్తస్తతోఽభవత్ ॥ ౨౦ ॥
vītihotras tv indrasenāt
[veetihotras tv indrasenaat]
tasya satyaśravā abhūt
[tasya satyashravaa abhoot]
uruśravāḥ sutas tasya
[urushravaah sutas tasya]
devadattas tato ’bhavat
[devadattas tato ’bhavat]
vītihotraḥ — Vītihotra tu — but indrasenāt — from Indrasena tasya — of Vītihotra satyaśravāḥ — known by the name Satyaśravā abhūt — there was uruśravāḥ — Uruśravā sutaḥ — was the son tasya — of him (Satyaśravā) devadattaḥ — Devadatta tataḥ — from Uruśravā abhavat — there was.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vītihotras tv indrasenāt
vītihotraḥ
Vītihotra
tu
but
indrasenāt
from Indrasena
tasya satyaśravā abhūt
tasya
of Vītihotra
satyaśravāḥ
known by the name Satyaśravā
abhūt
there was
uruśravāḥ sutas tasya
uruśravāḥ
Uruśravā
sutaḥ
was the son
tasya
of him (Satyaśravā)
devadattas tato ’bhavat
devadattaḥ
Devadatta
tataḥ
from Uruśravā
abhavat
there was.
From Indrasena came Vītihotra, from Vītihotra came Satyaśravā, from Satyaśravā came the son named Uruśravā, and from Uruśravā came Devadatta.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Indrasena came Vītihotra, from Vītihotra came Satyaśravā, from Satyaśravā came the son named Uruśravā, and from Uruśravā came Devadatta.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.21

↗
తతోఽగ్నివేశ్యో భగవానగ్ని: స్వయమభూత్ సుత: । కానీన ఇతి విఖ్యాతో జాతూకర్ణ్యో మహానృషి: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
tato ’gniveśyo bhagavān
[tato ’gniveshyo bhagavaan]
agniḥ svayam abhūt sutaḥ
[agnih svayam abhoot sutah]
kānīna iti vikhyāto
[kaaneena iti vikhyaato]
jātūkarṇyo mahān ṛṣiḥ
[jaatookarnyo mahaan rishih]
tataḥ — from Devadatta agniveśyaḥ — a son named Agniveśya bhagavān — the most powerful agniḥ — the fire-god svayam — personally abhūt — became sutaḥ — the son kānīnaḥ — Kānīna iti — thus vikhyātaḥ — was celebrated jātūkarṇyaḥ — Jātūkarṇya mahān ṛṣiḥ — the great saintly person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato ’gniveśyo bhagavān
tataḥ
from Devadatta
agniveśyaḥ
a son named Agniveśya
agniḥ svayam abhūt sutaḥ
bhagavān
the most powerful
agniḥ
the fire-god
svayam
personally
abhūt
became
sutaḥ
the son
kānīna iti vikhyāto
kānīnaḥ
Kānīna
iti
thus
vikhyātaḥ
was celebrated
jātūkarṇyo mahān ṛṣiḥ
jātūkarṇyaḥ
Jātūkarṇya
mahān ṛṣiḥ
the great saintly person.
From Devadatta came a son known as Agniveśya, who was the fire-god Agni himself. This son, who was a celebrated saint, was well known as Kānīna and Jātūkarṇya.

Agniveśya was also known as Kānīna and Jātūkarṇya.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Devadatta came a son known as Agniveśya, who was the fire-god Agni himself. This son, who was a great sage, was well known as Kānīna and Jātūkarṇya. Agniveśya was known as Kānīna and Jātūkarṇa.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.22

↗
తతో బ్రహ్మకులం జాతమాగ్నివేశ్యాయనం నృప । నరిష్యన్తాన్వయ: ప్రోక్తో దిష్టవంశమత: శ‍ృణు ॥ ౨౨ ॥
tato brahma-kulaṁ jātam
[tato brahma-kulam jaatam]
āgniveśyāyanaṁ nṛpa
[aagniveshyaayanam nripa]
nariṣyantānvayaḥ prokto
[narishyantaanvayah prokto]
diṣṭa-vaṁśam ataḥ śṛṇu
[dishta-vamsham atah shrinu]
tataḥ — from Agniveśya brahma-kulam — a dynasty of brāhmaṇas jātam — was generated āgniveśyāyanam — known as Āgniveśyāyana nṛpa — O King Parīkṣit nariṣyanta — of Nariṣyanta anvayaḥ — descendants proktaḥ — have been explained diṣṭa-vaṁśam — the dynasty of Diṣṭa ataḥ — hereafter śṛṇu — hear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato brahma-kulaṁ jātam
tataḥ
from Agniveśya
brahma-kulam
a dynasty of brāhmaṇas
jātam
was generated
āgniveśyāyanaṁ nṛpa
āgniveśyāyanam
known as Āgniveśyāyana
nṛpa
O King Parīkṣit
nariṣyantānvayaḥ prokto
nariṣyanta
of Nariṣyanta
anvayaḥ
descendants
proktaḥ
have been explained
diṣṭa-vaṁśam ataḥ śṛṇu
diṣṭa-vaṁśam
the dynasty of Diṣṭa
ataḥ
hereafter
śṛṇu
hear.
O King, from Agniveśya came a brahminical dynasty known as Āgniveśyāyana. Now that I have described the descendants of Nariṣyanta, let me describe the descendants of Diṣṭa. Please hear from me.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King, from Agniveśya came a brahminical dynasty known as Āgniveśyāyana. Now that I have described the descendants of Nariṣyanta, let me describe the descendants of Diṣṭa (another son of Manu). Please hear from me.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.23-24

↗
నాభాగో దిష్టపుత్రోఽన్య: కర్మణా వైశ్యతాం గత: । భలన్దన: సుతస్తస్య వత్సప్రీతిర్భలన్దనాత్ ॥ ౨౩ ॥ వత్సప్రీతే: సుత: ప్రాంశుస్తత్సుతం ప్రమతిం విదు: । ఖనిత్ర: ప్రమతేస్తస్మాచ్చాక్షుషోఽథ వివింశతి: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
nābhāgo diṣṭa-putro ’nyaḥ
[naabhaago dishta-putro ’nyah]
karmaṇā vaiśyatāṁ gataḥ
[karmanaa vaishyataam gatah]
bhalandanaḥ sutas tasya
[bhalandanah sutas tasya]
vatsaprītir bhalandanāt
[vatsapreetir bhalandanaat]
vatsaprīteḥ sutaḥ prāṁśus
[vatsapreeteh sutah praamshus]
tat-sutaṁ pramatiṁ viduḥ
[tat-sutam pramatim viduh]
khanitraḥ pramates tasmāc
[khanitrah pramates tasmaach]
cākṣuṣo ’tha viviṁśatiḥ
[chaakshusho ’tha vivimshatih]
nābhāgaḥ — by the name Nābhāga diṣṭa-putraḥ — the son of Diṣṭa anyaḥ — another karmaṇā — by occupation vaiśyatām — the order of the vaiśyas gataḥ — achieved bhalandanaḥ — by the name Bhalandana sutaḥ — son tasya — of him (Nābhāga) vatsaprītiḥ — by the name Vatsaprīti bhalandanāt — from Bhalandana vatsaprīteḥ — from Vatsaprīti sutaḥ — the son prāṁśuḥ — was named Prāṁśu tat-sutam — the son of him (Prāṁśu) pramatim — was named Pramati viduḥ — you should understand khanitraḥ — was named Khanitra pramateḥ — from Pramati tasmāt — from him (Khanitra) cākṣuṣaḥ — was named Cākṣuṣa atha — thus (from Cākṣuṣa) viviṁśatiḥ — the son named Viviṁśati.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nābhāgo diṣṭa-putro ’nyaḥ
nābhāgaḥ
by the name Nābhāga
diṣṭa-putraḥ
the son of Diṣṭa
karmaṇā vaiśyatāṁ gataḥ
anyaḥ
another
karmaṇā
by occupation
vaiśyatām
the order of the vaiśyas
gataḥ
achieved
bhalandanaḥ sutas tasya
bhalandanaḥ
by the name Bhalandana
sutaḥ
son
tasya
of him (Nābhāga)
vatsaprītir bhalandanāt
vatsaprītiḥ
by the name Vatsaprīti
bhalandanāt
from Bhalandana
vatsaprīteḥ sutaḥ prāṁśus
vatsaprīteḥ
from Vatsaprīti
sutaḥ
the son
prāṁśuḥ
was named Prāṁśu
tat-sutaṁ pramatiṁ viduḥ
tat-sutam
the son of him (Prāṁśu)
pramatim
was named Pramati
viduḥ
you should understand
khanitraḥ pramates tasmāc
khanitraḥ
was named Khanitra
pramateḥ
from Pramati
tasmāt
from him (Khanitra)
cākṣuṣo ’tha viviṁśatiḥ
cākṣuṣaḥ
was named Cākṣuṣa
atha
thus (from Cākṣuṣa)
viviṁśatiḥ
the son named Viviṁśati.
Diṣṭa had a son by the name Nābhāga. This Nābhāga, who was different from the Nābhāga described later, became a vaiśya by occupational duty. The son of Nābhāga was known as Bhalandana, the son of Bhalandana was Vatsaprīti, and his son was Prāṁśu. Prāṁśu’s son was Pramati, Pramati’s son was Khanitra, Khanitra’s son was Cākṣuṣa, and his son was Viviṁśati.

From Manu, one son became a kṣatriya, another a brāhmaṇa, and another a vaiśya. This confirms the statement by Nārada Muni, yasya yal lakṣaṇaṁ proktaṁ puṁso varṇābhivyaṣjakam ( Bhāg. 7.11.35 ). One should always remember that brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas should never be regarded as members of a caste by birth. A brāhmaṇa may be changed into a kṣatriya, and a kṣatriya into a brāhmaṇa. Similarly, a brāhmaṇa or kṣatriya may be changed into a vaiśya, and a vaiśya into a brāhmaṇa or kṣatriya. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā ( cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ ). So one is a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya or vaiśya never by birth, but by quality. There is a great need of brāhmaṇas. Therefore, in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, we are trying to train some brāhmaṇas to guide human society. Because at present there is a scarcity of brāhmaṇas, the brain of human society is lost. Because practically everyone is a śūdra, no one at the present moment can guide the members of society to the proper path by which to achieve perfection in life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Diṣṭa had a son by the name Nābhāga. This Nābhāga, who was different from the Nābhāga described later, became a vaiśya by occupational duty. The son of Nābhāga was known as Bhalandana, the son of Bhalandana was Vatsaprīti, and his son was Prāṁśu. Prāṁśu's son was Pramati, Pramati's son was Khanitra, Khanitra's son was Cākṣuṣa, and his son was Viviṁśati. Anyaḥ means a different from another person called Nābhāga discussed later.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.25

↗
వివింశతే: సుతో రమ్భ: ఖనీనేత్రోఽస్య ధార్మిక: । కరన్ధమో మహారాజ తస్యాసీదాత్మజో నృప ॥ ౨౫ ॥
viviṁśateḥ suto rambhaḥ
[vivimshateh suto rambhah]
khanīnetro ’sya dhārmikaḥ
[khaneenetro ’sya dhaarmikah]
karandhamo mahārāja
[karandhamo mahaaraaja]
tasyāsīd ātmajo nṛpa
[tasyaaseed aatmajo nripa]
viviṁśateḥ — from Viviṁśati sutaḥ — the son rambhaḥ — named Rambha khanīnetraḥ — named Khanīnetra asya — of Rambha dhārmikaḥ — very religious karandhamaḥ — named Karandhama mahārāja — O King tasya — of him (Khanīnetra) āsīt — was ātmajaḥ — the son nṛpa — O King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viviṁśateḥ suto rambhaḥ
viviṁśateḥ
from Viviṁśati
sutaḥ
the son
rambhaḥ
named Rambha
khanīnetro ’sya dhārmikaḥ
khanīnetraḥ
named Khanīnetra
karandhamo mahārāja
tasyāsīd ātmajo nṛpa
asya
of Rambha
dhārmikaḥ
very religious
karandhamaḥ
named Karandhama
mahārāja
O King
tasya
of him (Khanīnetra)
āsīt
was
ātmajaḥ
the son
nṛpa
O King.
The son of Viviṁśati was Rambha, whose son was the great and religious King Khanīnetra. O King, the son of Khanīnetra was King Karandhama.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Viviṁśati was Rambha, whose son was religious King Khanīnetra. O King, the son of Khanīnetra was King Karandhama.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.26

↗
తస్యావీక్షిత్ సుతో యస్య మరుత్తశ్చక్రవర్త్యభూత్ । సంవర్తోఽయాజయద్ యం వై మహాయోగ్యఙ్గిర:సుత: ॥ ౨౬ ॥
tasyāvīkṣit suto yasya
[tasyaaveekshit suto yasya]
maruttaś cakravarty abhūt
[maruttash chakravarty abhoot]
saṁvarto ’yājayad yaṁ vai
[samvarto ’yaajayad yam vai]
mahā-yogy aṅgiraḥ-sutaḥ
[mahaa-yogy angirah-sutah]
tasya — of him (Karandhama) avīkṣit — named Avīkṣit sutaḥ — the son yasya — of whom (Avīkṣit) maruttaḥ — (the son) named Marutta cakravartī — the emperor abhūt — became saṁvartaḥ — Saṁvarta ayājayat — engaged in performing sacrifice yam — unto whom (Marutta) vai — indeed mahā-yogī — the great mystic aṅgiraḥ-sutaḥ — the son of Aṅgirā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyāvīkṣit suto yasya
tasya
of him (Karandhama)
avīkṣit
named Avīkṣit
sutaḥ
the son
yasya
of whom (Avīkṣit)
maruttaś cakravarty abhūt
maruttaḥ
(the son) named Marutta
cakravartī
the emperor
abhūt
became
saṁvarto ’yājayad yaṁ vai
saṁvartaḥ
Saṁvarta
ayājayat
engaged in performing sacrifice
yam
unto whom (Marutta)
vai
indeed
mahā-yogy aṅgiraḥ-sutaḥ
mahā-yogī
the great mystic
aṅgiraḥ-sutaḥ
the son of Aṅgirā.
From Karandhama came a son named Avīkṣit, and from Avīkṣit a son named Marutta, who was the emperor. The great mystic Saṁvarta, the son of Aṅgirā, engaged Marutta in performing a sacrifice [yajṣa].
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Karandhama came a son named Avīkṣit, and from Avīkṣit came a son named Marutta, who became the emperor. The great mystic Saṁvarta, the son of Aṅgirā, engaged Marutta in performing a sacrifice.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.27

↗
మరుత్తస్య యథా యజ్ఞో న తథాన్యోఽస్తి కశ్చన । సర్వం హిరణ్మయం త్వాసీద్ యత్ కిఞ్చిచ్చాస్య శోభనమ్ ॥ ౨౭ ॥
maruttasya yathā yajṣo
[maruttasya yathaa yajsho]
na tathānyo ’sti kaścana
[na tathaanyo ’sti kashchana]
sarvaṁ hiraṇmayaṁ tv āsīd
[sarvam hiranmayam tv aaseed]
yat kiṣcic cāsya śobhanam
[yat kishchich chaasya shobhanam]
maruttasya — of Marutta yathā — as yajṣaḥ — performance of sacrifice na — not tathā — like that anyaḥ — any other asti — there is kaścana — anything sarvam — everything hiraṇ-mayam — made of gold tu — indeed āsīt — there was yat kiṣcit — whatever he had ca — and asya — of Marutta śobhanam — extremely beautiful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maruttasya yathā yajṣo
maruttasya
of Marutta
yathā
as
yajṣaḥ
performance of sacrifice
na tathānyo ’sti kaścana
na
not
tathā
like that
anyaḥ
any other
asti
there is
kaścana
anything
sarvaṁ hiraṇmayaṁ tv āsīd
sarvam
everything
hiraṇ-mayam
made of gold
tu
indeed
āsīt
there was
yat kiṣcic cāsya śobhanam
yat kiṣcit
whatever he had
ca
and
asya
of Marutta
śobhanam
extremely beautiful.
The sacrificial paraphernalia of King Marutta was extremely beautiful, for everything was made of gold. Indeed, no other sacrifice could compare to his.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sacrificial paraphernalia of King Marutta was extremely beautiful, for everything was made of gold. No other sacrifice could compare to his. Whatever utensils he had were made of splendid gold.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.28

↗
అమాద్యదిన్ద్ర: సోమేన దక్షిణాభిర్ద్విజాతయ: । మరుత: పరివేష్టారో విశ్వేదేవా: సభాసద: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
amādyad indraḥ somena
[amaadyad indrah somena]
dakṣiṇābhir dvijātayaḥ
[dakshinaabhir dvijaatayah]
marutaḥ pariveṣṭāro
[marutah pariveshtaaro]
viśvedevāḥ sabhā-sadaḥ
[vishvedevaah sabhaa-sadah]
amādyat — became intoxicated indraḥ — the King of heaven, Lord Indra somena — by drinking the intoxicant soma-rasa dakṣiṇābhiḥ — by receiving sufficient contributions dvijātayaḥ — the brahminical group marutaḥ — the airs pariveṣṭāraḥ — offering the foodstuffs viśvedevāḥ — universal demigods sabhā-sadaḥ — members of the assembly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
amādyad indraḥ somena
amādyat
became intoxicated
indraḥ
the King of heaven, Lord Indra
somena
by drinking the intoxicant soma-rasa
dakṣiṇābhir dvijātayaḥ
dakṣiṇābhiḥ
by receiving sufficient contributions
dvijātayaḥ
the brahminical group
marutaḥ pariveṣṭāro
marutaḥ
the airs
pariveṣṭāraḥ
offering the foodstuffs
viśvedevāḥ sabhā-sadaḥ
viśvedevāḥ
universal demigods
sabhā-sadaḥ
members of the assembly.
In that sacrifice, King Indra became intoxicated by drinking a large quantity of soma-rasa. The brāhmaṇas received ample contributions, and therefore they were satisfied. For that sacrifice, the various demigods who control the winds offered foodstuffs, and the Viśvedevas were members of the assembly.

Because of the yajṣa performed by Marutta, everyone was pleased, especially the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas. Brāhmaṇas are interested in receiving contributions as priests, and kṣatriyas are interested in drinking. All of them, therefore, were satisfied with their different engagements.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In that sacrifice, King Indra was satisfied by drinking soma-rasa. The brāhmaṇas were satisfied by ample contributions. For that sacrifice, the various wind devatās offered foodstuffs and the Viśvedevas were members of the assembly. The brāhmaṇas were satisfied with the contributions.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.29

↗
మరుత్తస్య దమ: పుత్రస్తస్యాసీద్ రాజ్యవర్ధన: । సుధృతిస్తత్సుతో జజ్ఞే సౌధృతేయో నర: సుత: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
maruttasya damaḥ putras
[maruttasya damah putras]
tasyāsīd rājyavardhanaḥ
[tasyaaseed raajyavardhanah]
sudhṛtis tat-suto jajṣe
[sudhritis tat-suto jajshe]
saudhṛteyo naraḥ sutaḥ
[saudhriteyo narah sutah]
maruttasya — of Marutta damaḥ — (was named) Dama putraḥ — the son tasya — of him (Dama) āsīt — there was rājya-vardhanaḥ — named Rājyavardhana, or one who can expand the kingdom sudhṛtiḥ — was named Sudhṛti tat-sutaḥ — the son of him (Rājyavardhana) jajṣe — was born saudhṛteyaḥ — from Sudhṛti naraḥ — named Nara sutaḥ — the son.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maruttasya damaḥ putras
maruttasya
of Marutta
damaḥ
(was named) Dama
putraḥ
the son
tasyāsīd rājyavardhanaḥ
tasya
of him (Dama)
āsīt
there was
rājya-vardhanaḥ
named Rājyavardhana, or one who can expand the kingdom
sudhṛtis tat-suto jajṣe
sudhṛtiḥ
was named Sudhṛti
tat-sutaḥ
the son of him (Rājyavardhana)
jajṣe
was born
saudhṛteyo naraḥ sutaḥ
saudhṛteyaḥ
from Sudhṛti
naraḥ
named Nara
sutaḥ
the son.
Marutta’s son was Dama, Dama’s son was Rājyavardhana, Rājyavardhana’s son was Sudhṛti, and his son was Nara.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Marutta's son was Dama, Dama's son was Rājyavardhana, Rājyavardhana's son was Sudhṛti, and his son was Nara.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.30

↗
తత్సుత: కేవలస్తస్మాద్ ధున్ధుమాన్వేగవాంస్తత: । బుధస్తస్యాభవద్ యస్య తృణబిన్దుర్మహీపతి: ॥ ౩౦ ॥
tat-sutaḥ kevalas tasmād
[tat-sutah kevalas tasmaad]
dhundhumān vegavāṁs tataḥ
[dhundhumaan vegavaams tatah]
budhas tasyābhavad yasya
[budhas tasyaabhavad yasya]
tṛṇabindur mahīpatiḥ
[trinabindur maheepatih]
tat-sutaḥ — the son of him (Nara) kevalaḥ — was named Kevala tasmāt — from him (Kevala) dhundhumān — a son was born named Dhundhumān vegavān — named Vegavān tataḥ — from him (Dhundhumān) budhaḥ — named Budha tasya — of him (Vegavān) abhavat — there was yasya — of whom (Budha) tṛṇabinduḥ — a son named Tṛṇabindu mahīpatiḥ — the king.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-sutaḥ kevalas tasmād
tat-sutaḥ
the son of him (Nara)
kevalaḥ
was named Kevala
tasmāt
from him (Kevala)
dhundhumān vegavāṁs tataḥ
dhundhumān
a son was born named Dhundhumān
vegavān
named Vegavān
tataḥ
from him (Dhundhumān)
budhas tasyābhavad yasya
budhaḥ
named Budha
tasya
of him (Vegavān)
abhavat
there was
yasya
of whom (Budha)
tṛṇabindur mahīpatiḥ
tṛṇabinduḥ
a son named Tṛṇabindu
mahīpatiḥ
the king.
The son of Nara was Kevala, and his son was Dhundhumān, whose son was Vegavān. Vegavān’s son was Budha, and Budha’s son was Tṛṇabindu, who became the king of this earth.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Nara was Kevala, and his son was Dhundhumān, whose son was Vegavān. Vegavān's son was Budha, and Budha's son was the great king Tṛṇabindu.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.31

↗
తం భేజేఽలమ్బుషా దేవీ భజనీయగుణాలయమ్ । వరాప్సరా యత: పుత్రా: కన్యా చేలవిలాభవత్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
taṁ bheje ’lambuṣā devī
[tam bheje ’lambushaa devee]
bhajanīya-guṇālayam
[bhajaneeya-gunaalayam]
varāpsarā yataḥ putrāḥ
[varaapsaraa yatah putraah]
kanyā celavilābhavat
[kanyaa chelavilaabhavat]
tam — him (Tṛṇabindu) bheje — accepted as husband alambuṣā — the girl Alambuṣā devī — goddess bhajanīya — worthy of accepting guṇa-ālayam — the reservoir of all good qualities vara-apsarāḥ — the best of the Apsarās yataḥ — from whom (Tṛṇabindu) putrāḥ — some sons kanyā — a daughter ca — and ilavilā — named Ilavilā abhavat — was born.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ bheje ’lambuṣā devī
tam
him (Tṛṇabindu)
bheje
accepted as husband
bhajanīya-guṇālayam
alambuṣā
the girl Alambuṣā
devī
goddess
varāpsarā yataḥ putrāḥ
kanyā celavilābhavat
bhajanīya
worthy of accepting
guṇa-ālayam
the reservoir of all good qualities
vara-apsarāḥ
the best of the Apsarās
yataḥ
from whom (Tṛṇabindu)
putrāḥ
some sons
kanyā
a daughter
ca
and
ilavilā
named Ilavilā
abhavat
was born.
The best of the Apsarās, the highly qualified girl named Alambuṣā, accepted the similarly qualified Tṛṇabindu as her husband. She gave birth to a few sons and a daughter known as Ilavilā.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The best of the Apsarās, named Alambuṣā, accepted the similarly qualified Tṛṇabindu as her husband. She gave birth to a few sons and a daughter known as Ilavilā. From her there were sons like Viśāla.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.32

↗
యస్యాముత్పాదయామాస విశ్రవా ధనదం సుతమ్ । ప్రాదాయ విద్యాం పరమామృషిర్యోగేశ్వర: పితు: ॥ ౩౨ ॥
yasyām utpādayām āsa
[yasyaam utpaadayaam aasa]
viśravā dhanadaṁ sutam
[vishravaa dhanadam sutam]
prādāya vidyāṁ paramām
[praadaaya vidyaam paramaam]
ṛṣir yogeśvaraḥ pituḥ
[rishir yogeshvarah pituh]
yasyām — in whom (Ilavilā) utpādayām āsa — gave birth viśravāḥ — Viśravā dhana-dam — Kuvera, or one who gives money sutam — to a son prādāya — after receiving vidyām — absolute knowledge paramām — supreme ṛṣiḥ — the great saintly person yoga-īśvaraḥ — master of mystic yoga pituḥ — from his father.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yasyām utpādayām āsa
yasyām
in whom (Ilavilā)
utpādayām āsa
gave birth
viśravā dhanadaṁ sutam
viśravāḥ
Viśravā
dhana-dam
Kuvera, or one who gives money
sutam
to a son
prādāya vidyāṁ paramām
prādāya
after receiving
vidyām
absolute knowledge
paramām
supreme
ṛṣir yogeśvaraḥ pituḥ
ṛṣiḥ
the great saintly person
yoga-īśvaraḥ
master of mystic yoga
pituḥ
from his father.
After the great saint Viśravā, the master of mystic yoga, received absolute knowledge from his father, he begot in the womb of Ilavilā the greatly celebrated son known as Kuvera, the giver of money.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After the great saint Viśravā, the master of mystic yoga, received absolute knowledge from his father, he begot in the womb of Ilavilā the greatly celebrated son known as Kuvera, the giver of money. Receiving (prādāya) the highest knowledge from his father, he begot Kuvera in Ilavilā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.33

↗
విశాల: శూన్యబన్ధుశ్చ ధూమ్రకేతుశ్చ తత్సుతా: । విశాలో వంశకృద్ రాజా వైశాలీం నిర్మమే పురీమ్ ॥ ౩౩ ॥
viśālaḥ śūnyabandhuś ca
[vishaalah shoonyabandhush cha]
dhūmraketuś ca tat-sutāḥ
[dhoomraketush cha tat-sutaah]
viśālo vaṁśa-kṛd rājā
[vishaalo vamsha-krid raajaa]
vaiśālīṁ nirmame purīm
[vaishaaleem nirmame pureem]
viśālaḥ — named Viśāla śūnyabandhuḥ — named Śūnyabandhu ca — also dhūmraketuḥ — named Dhūmraketu ca — also tat-sutāḥ — the sons of Tṛṇabindu viśālaḥ — among the three, King Viśāla vaṁśa-kṛt — made a dynasty rājā — the king vaiśālīm — by the name Vaiśālī nirmame — constructed purīm — a palace.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viśālaḥ śūnyabandhuś ca
viśālaḥ
named Viśāla
śūnyabandhuḥ
named Śūnyabandhu
ca
also
dhūmraketuś ca tat-sutāḥ
dhūmraketuḥ
named Dhūmraketu
ca
also
tat-sutāḥ
the sons of Tṛṇabindu
viśālo vaṁśa-kṛd rājā
viśālaḥ
among the three, King Viśāla
vaṁśa-kṛt
made a dynasty
rājā
the king
vaiśālīṁ nirmame purīm
vaiśālīm
by the name Vaiśālī
nirmame
constructed
purīm
a palace.
Tṛṇabindu had three sons, named Viśāla, Śūnyabandhu and Dhūmraketu. Among these three, Viśāla created a dynasty and constructed a palace called Vaiśālī.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Tṛṇabindu had three sons, named Viśāla, Śūnyabandhu and Dhūmraketu. Among these three, Viśāla created a dynasty and constructed a city called Vaiśālī. Of Tṛṇabindhu (tasya) there were three sons.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.34

↗
హేమచన్ద్ర: సుతస్తస్య ధూమ్రాక్షస్తస్య చాత్మజ: । తత్పుత్రాత్ సంయమాదాసీత్ కృశాశ్వ: సహదేవజ: ॥ ౩౪ ॥
hemacandraḥ sutas tasya
[hemachandrah sutas tasya]
dhūmrākṣas tasya cātmajaḥ
[dhoomraakshas tasya chaatmajah]
tat-putrāt saṁyamād āsīt
[tat-putraat samyamaad aaseet]
kṛśāśvaḥ saha-devajaḥ
[krishaashvah saha-devajah]
hemacandraḥ — was named Hemacandra sutaḥ — the son tasya — of him (Viśāla) dhūmrākṣaḥ — was named Dhūmrākṣa tasya — of him (Hemacandra) ca — also ātmajaḥ — the son tat-putrāt — from the son of him (Dhūmrākṣa) saṁyamāt — from he who was named Saṁyama āsīt — there was kṛśāśvaḥ — Kṛśāśva saha — along with devajaḥ — Devaja.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hemacandraḥ sutas tasya
hemacandraḥ
was named Hemacandra
sutaḥ
the son
tasya
of him (Viśāla)
dhūmrākṣas tasya cātmajaḥ
dhūmrākṣaḥ
was named Dhūmrākṣa
tasya
of him (Hemacandra)
ca
also
ātmajaḥ
the son
tat-putrāt saṁyamād āsīt
tat-putrāt
from the son of him (Dhūmrākṣa)
saṁyamāt
from he who was named Saṁyama
āsīt
there was
kṛśāśvaḥ saha-devajaḥ
kṛśāśvaḥ
Kṛśāśva
saha
along with
devajaḥ
Devaja.
The son of Viśāla was known as Hemacandra, his son was Dhūmrākṣa, and his son was Saṁyama, whose sons were Devaja and Kṛśāśva.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Viśāla was known as Hemacandra, his son was Dhūmrākṣa, and his son was Saṁyama, whose sons were Devaja and Kṛśāśva.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.2.35-36

↗
కృశాశ్వాత్ సోమదత్తోఽభూద్ యోఽశ్వమేధైరిడస్పతిమ్ । ఇష్ట్వా పురుషమాపాగ్ర్యాం గతిం యోగేశ్వరాశ్రితామ్ ॥ ౩౫ ॥ సౌమదత్తిస్తు సుమతిస్తత్పుత్రో జనమేజయ: । ఏతే వైశాలభూపాలాస్తృణబిన్దోర్యశోధరా: ॥ ౩౬ ॥
kṛśāśvāt somadatto ’bhūd
[krishaashvaat somadatto ’bhood]
yo ’śvamedhair iḍaspatim
[yo ’shvamedhair idaspatim]
iṣṭvā puruṣam āpāgryāṁ
[ishtvaa purusham aapaagryaam]
gatiṁ yogeśvarāśritām
[gatim yogeshvaraashritaam]
saumadattis tu sumatis
[saumadattis tu sumatis]
tat-putro janamejayaḥ
[tat-putro janamejayah]
ete vaiśāla-bhūpālās
[ete vaishaala-bhoopaalaas]
tṛṇabindor yaśodharāḥ
[trinabindor yashodharaah]
kṛśāśvāt — from Kṛśāśva somadattaḥ — a son named Somadatta abhūt — there was yaḥ — he who (Somadatta) aśvamedhaiḥ — by the performance of aśvamedha sacrifices iḍaspatim — unto Lord Viṣṇu iṣṭvā — after worshiping puruṣam — Lord Viṣṇu āpa — achieved agryām — the best of all gatim — the destination yogeśvara-āśritām — the place occupied by great mystic yogīs saumadattiḥ — the son of Somadatta tu — but sumatiḥ — a son named Sumati tat-putraḥ — the son of him (Sumati) janamejayaḥ — was named Janamejaya ete — all of them vaiśāla-bhūpālāḥ — the kings in the dynasty of Vaiśāla tṛṇabindoḥ yaśaḥ-dharāḥ — continued the fame of King Tṛṇabindu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛśāśvāt somadatto ’bhūd
kṛśāśvāt
from Kṛśāśva
somadattaḥ
a son named Somadatta
yo ’śvamedhair iḍaspatim
iṣṭvā puruṣam āpāgryāṁ
gatiṁ yogeśvarāśritām
saumadattis tu sumatis
tat-putro janamejayaḥ
ete vaiśāla-bhūpālās
abhūt
there was
tṛṇabindor yaśodharāḥ
yaḥ
he who (Somadatta)
aśvamedhaiḥ
by the performance of aśvamedha sacrifices
iḍaspatim
unto Lord Viṣṇu
iṣṭvā
after worshiping
puruṣam
Lord Viṣṇu
āpa
achieved
agryām
the best of all
gatim
the destination
yogeśvara-āśritām
the place occupied by great mystic yogīs
saumadattiḥ
the son of Somadatta
tu
but
sumatiḥ
a son named Sumati
tat-putraḥ
the son of him (Sumati)
janamejayaḥ
was named Janamejaya
ete
all of them
vaiśāla-bhūpālāḥ
the kings in the dynasty of Vaiśāla
tṛṇabindoḥ yaśaḥ-dharāḥ
continued the fame of King Tṛṇabindu.
The son of Kṛśāśva was Somadatta, who performed aśvamedha sacrifices and thus satisfied the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. By worshiping the Supreme Lord, he achieved the most exalted post, a residence on the planet to which great mystic yogīs are elevated. The son of Somadatta was Sumati, whose son was Janamejaya. All these kings appearing in the dynasty of Viśāla properly maintained the celebrated position of King Tṛṇabindu.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Ninth Canto, Second Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Dynasties of the Sons of Manu.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Kṛśāśva was Somadatta, who, by aśvamedha sacrifices, worshipped the Supreme lord and achieved the most exalted post, attained by the best of yogīs. The son of Somadatta was Sumati, whose son was Janamejaya. All these kings appearing in the dynasty of Viśāla properly maintained the celebrated position of King Tṛṇabindu. Thus ends the commentary on the Second Chapter of the Ninth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Three King Śaryāti’s Lineage 9.3: The Marriage of Sukanyā and Cyavana Muni 3. The Marriage of Sukanyā and Cyavana Muni 9.3 Summary This chapter describes the dynasty of Śaryāti, another son of Manu, and also tells about Sukanyā and Revatī. Devajṣa Śaryāti gave instructions about what to do in the ritualistic ceremony observed on the second day of the yajṣa of the Aṅgirasas. One day, Śaryāti, along with his daughter, known as Sukanyā, went to the āśrama of Cyavana Muni. There Sukanyā saw two glowing substances within a hole of earthworms, and by chance she pierced those two glowing substances. As soon as she did this, blood began to ooze from that hole. Consequently, King Śaryāti and his companions suffered from constipation and inability to pass urine. When the King asked why circumstances had suddenly changed, he found that Sukanyā was the cause of this misfortune. Then they all offered prayers to Cyavana Muni just to satisfy him according to his own desire, and Devajṣa Śaryāti offered his daughter to Cyavana Muni, who was a very old man. When the heavenly physicians the Aśvinī-kumāra brothers once visited Cyavana Muni, the muni requested them to give him back his youth. These two physicians took Cyavana Muni to a particular lake, in which they bathed and regained full youth. After this, Sukanyā could not distinguish her husband. She then surrendered unto the Aśvinī-kumāras, who were very satisfied with her chastity and who therefore introduced her again to her husband. Cyavana Muni then engaged King Śaryāti in performing the soma-yajṣa and gave the Aśvinī-kumāras the privilege to drink soma-rasa. The King of heaven, Lord Indra, became very angry at this, but he could do no harm to Śaryāti. Henceforward, the Aśvinī-kumāra physicians were able to share in the soma-rasa. Śaryāti later had three sons, named Uttānabarhi, Ānarta and Bhūriṣeṇa. Ānarta had one son, whose name was Revata. Revata had one hundred sons, of whom the eldest was Kakudmī. Kakudmī was advised by Lord Brahmā to offer his beautiful daughter, Revatī, to Baladeva, who belongs to the viṣṇu-tattva category. After doing this, Kakudmī retired from family life and entered the forest of Badarikāśrama to execute austerities and penances.
📝 My note