FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

1.9 · The Passing Away of Bhīṣmadeva in the Presence of Lord Kṛṣṇa

48 verses
L Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16510 chars)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

L - Love (7-11)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

Pure Love

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love “The ultimate result of devotional service is to develop genuine love for the Supreme Personality. Love is a word which is often used in relation with man and woman. And love is the only word that can be properly used to indicate the relation between Lord Krishna and the living entities. The living entities are mentioned as prakrti in the Bhagavad-gita, and in Sanskrit prakrti is a feminine object. The Lord is always described as the parama-purusa , or the supreme male personality. Thus the affection between the Lord and the living entities is something like that between the male and the female. Therefore the term love of Godhead is quite appropriate.” (SB 1.7.7) Industries thrive on it, popstars sing about it, teenagers dream about it, and people are willing to do practically anything for it. To love and be loved - the everlasting, universal dream. Though we wholeheartedly endeavour for that perfect connection in our material sojourn, for the most part it’s a letdown, and the story of life is more a case of frustrated love. Srimad-Bhagavatam introduces us to a world of pure and selfless loving relationships. Because the accounts of loving exchange are so rich, Srimad-Bhagavatam is described as rasamalayam , ‘the abode of loving relish.’ The narrations described in this section give us an insight into these divine exchanges. In Gopala Champu, Jiva Goswami states that hearing of the love exchanged between Krishna and His devotees helps awaken a similar love within the heart of the sincere hearer. When the innate desire for loving connection is reposed in Krishna, everything makes perfect sense, we reconnect with our true purpose and life becomes full of joy and happiness. Some think of God as a strict and unforgiving judge; the old man who sits on a grand throne and hurls down thunderbolts every time someone deviates. Others consider Him a crutch for the weak; an imaginary being who brings peace, hope and comfort, but has little to do with objective reality. Some think of God as a mythological tool of the power-hungry elite, used to keep the masses in line and maintain the status quo. For many, God is simply the cosmic order supplier; a convenient port of call in times of need and want. The Vedic writings paint a radically different picture. Their extraordinary revelation is not simply that God exists, but that He is bursting with colour, character and bliss. According to the Taittiriya Upanisad (2.7.1), God is ‘ raso vai sah ’ – the perfect embodiment of affectionate relationships, loving relish and transcendental sweetness.

Previous The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Next Rasa Theology Last updated 1 year ago

Our Relationship with Krishna

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Our Relationship with Krishna The narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam are an inspiration to revive our own connection with Krishna, who is ever-awaiting the opportunity to engage in relationships of pure love with His devotees. Though Krishna receives the love of unlimited associates, He still considers our love for him so invaluable and indispensable that He yearns for the living entity to reconnect with Him, and personally descends to the world to make all arrangements to that end. Srila Prabhupada explains: “In the spiritual world there are five kinds of relationships with the Supreme Lord - s anta, dasya, sakhya, vatsalya and madhurya . The perverted reflections of these rasas are found in the material world. Land, home, furniture and other inert material objects are related in santa , or the neutral and silent sense, whereas servants work in the dasya relationship. The reciprocation between friends is called sakhya , the affection of a parent for a child is known as vatsalya , and the affairs of conjugal love constitute madhurya . These five relationships in the material world are distorted reflections of the original, pure sentiments, which should be understood and perfected in relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead under the guidance of a bona fide spiritual master. In the material world the perverted rasas bring frustration. If these rasas are re- established with Lord Krishna, the result is eternal, blissful life.” ( CC Adi 1.56 ) By diligently chanting the holy names of Krishna, as outlined by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, anyone can purify their heart and reawaken their original spiritual form ( svarupa ) and relationship with the Lord. We hold back in the relationships of this world because we are uncertain of how others will reciprocate with our love. Furthermore, we are reticent about investing too much in an individual, since it may damage other relationships. When we direct our love towards Krishna, however, we can rest assured that He’ll generously and unfailingly reciprocate with every single endeavour we make. In addition, by nurturing our love for Krishna we automatically develop our love for everyone else, since all living entities are eternally and intimately connected with Him.

Previous Rasa Theology Next A - Attaining the Absolute (12-15) Last updated 1 year ago

Rasa Theology

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Rasa Theology Rupa Goswami, the leading disciple of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, dissected the vast theology of rasa (loving relish) and systematically presented it in his masterpiece known as the Bhakti-rasamrita Sindhu, literally translated as the ‘Nectarean ocean of devotional sentiments.’ Drawing from the Sanskrit dramaturgy of Bharata Muni, Rupa Goswami analyses the subtle loving feelings that souls experience in a variety of relationships with Krishna. Just as a full meal contains salty, spicy, pungent and sweet preparations, all combining to give a complete experience, so the various tastes of rasa create a unique spiritual experience. Rupa Goswami poetically compares the devotees of the Lord to sharks ( makara ) who swim deep in this ocean of love, oblivious to the small rivers of spiritual side benefits (like liberation from suffering). Whilst swimming in the oceanic relationship with Krishna, they find the most valuable of jewels in the depths of the seabed. The love experienced between the living entity and God can take many forms, each with unique intensities. To enter such exchanges, one must first become entirely averse to the allure of material pleasures, which block one’s ability to enter the arena of pure spiritual love. In the early stages of spirituality, one may gravitate towards an impersonal conception of the Supreme. God is seen as an energy, consciousness or all-pervading influence. True love, however, is experienced between persons, where there is opportunity for interaction, exchange and an active reciprocation. Though the Lord is the complete whole, both personal and impersonal, His Supreme personal feature invites a more intimate relationship where deeper emotions can be experienced. The Personality of Godhead manifests Himself in a variety of forms. Vishnu is God at work – the personality who creates and maintains the entire cosmos. Krishna, on the other hand, is God at home – the personality who is more concerned with intimate relationships and loving interactions. Thus, according to rasa theology, a more intimate connection can be established with Krishna. Amongst devotees of Krishna, there are also variations. Some focus on His majestic qualities and awe-inspiring opulence and power ( aisvarya ). Their understanding gives rise to a mood of respect and reverence, which invariably creates a distance too. Those who focus on Krishna’s sweetness ( madhurya ), captured by His irresistible beauty and charm, transcend such barriers and enter into closer exchanges. Of such confidential devotees, there are those who are in union with Krishna and experience the ecstasy of meeting Him face-to-face ( sambhoga ). Other devotees, however, are subjected to separation from Krishna ( vipralambha ). Their desperation and anticipation to meet Him creates a heightened emotional churning and unrelenting yearning. The gopis of Vrindavana are the prime example of this. Their feelings of transcendental separation are considered the epitome of divine love for God [ 3 ].

Previous Pure Love Next Our Relationship with Krishna Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Arjuna

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Arjuna Chapter 7 Having answered the first query, Suta Goswami turns his attention to the second question of the sages: “How was Sukadeva Goswami viewed by others, and how did his meeting with Maharaja Pariksit transpire?” Before directly addressing this, Suta Goswami narrated the events which transpired at the conclusion of the Kuruksetra battle, which is when Maharaja Pariksit was born. When Asvatthama was being chased by Arjuna due to his heinous act of killing the sleeping sons of Draupadi, he released a deadly brahmastra weapon in a frenzy of panic. Arjuna was startled and confused, unsure of what his next move should be. Since surrendered devotees see the Lord as their only protector, Arjuna instinctively approached Krishna in his time of need and sought counsel. Though in the most intense of situations, Arjuna lovingly glorified Krishna and expressed his full dependence upon Him. Taking Krishna’s advice, Arjuna counteracted Asvatthama’s weapon with his own brahmastra and thus captured the ruthless warrior. There were conflicting proposals as to what Asvatthama’s fate should be – some called for his death while others wanted to spare him. Arjuna ingeniously cut the jewel and hair from Asvatthama’s head. The warrior was utterly humiliated but still alive, and Arjuna successfully reconciled all the different opinions by simultaneously ‘killing’ him and sparing his life.

Previous L - Love (7-11) Next The Love of Uttara Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Bhismadeva

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Bhismadeva Chapter 9 Overwhelmed and traumatised by the massacre that had occurred at Kuruksetra, Maharaja Yuddhistira went to visit Bhismadeva, accompanied by Krishna and the Pandavas. Lying on the bed of arrows, Bhismadeva praised the Pandavas for patiently tolerating so many devious intrigues and grievous injustices. Despite their piety, knowledge, strength, righteousness, and having Krishna as their constant companion, the Pandavas were not exempt from difficulties. The divine plans of the Lord, Bhismadeva said, are practically impossible to decode. With deep gratitude and appreciation, Bhismadeva beautifully glorified Krishna and expressed his incomparable fortune at having the Supreme Lord present during his final hours. The legendary grandsire imparted his concluding words of wisdom to Maharaja Yuddhistira, offering a variety of profound insights on the duties of human beings ( dharma ) in various contexts of life. Immersing his consciousness in Krishna, he offered his deep appreciation to the Lord and prayed for the ability to remember Him at death. Bhismadeva thus departed this mortal world in perfect consciousness. His spiritual purity transported him to the Lord’s abode. With the historic departure of Bhismadeva, Maharaja Yuddhistira was duly enthroned as the next leader.

Previous The Love of Kunti Next The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Chapter 11 The separation in Hastinapura was contrasted with a jubilant meeting in Dwaraka. In that city of immeasurable opulence, all the inhabitants excitedly welcomed Krishna and offered Him an abundance of gifts in great love. Krishna was reunited with His parents, Vasudeva and Devaki, and bowed down to them with great affection. When Krishna entered the palaces of His 16,108 queens, they were completely overwhelmed at the sight of their Lord and husband, and a variety of loving sentiments arose within them. They embraced Krishna in their hearts, with their eyes, and through their sons. Even prostitutes and outcastes lovingly greeted Krishna, who, being equally affectionate to all, unhesitatingly reciprocated with each and everyone’s devotion.

Previous The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Next Pure Love Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Chapter 10 Having remained in Hastinapura for a few months, Krishna decided it was time to leave. As He departed, the ladies began crying profusely, while other residents of Hastinapura nearly fainted from the feelings of impending separation. Their hearts were melting in the pot of attraction for Krishna. Such are the intense emotions of Krishna’s pure devotees. Maharaja Yuddhistira provided Krishna with martial protection and the Pandavas followed along as far as they could to see Him off. It was an agonising departure. In separation, lovers feel one moment to be like millions of years. This unique type of emotion, known as vipralambha-bhava , paradoxically generates the most intense connection with Krishna.

Previous The Love of Bhismadeva Next The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Kunti

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Kunti Chapter 8 Having witnessed yet another exhibition of Krishna’s love, compassion and unrelenting protection, Queen Kunti offered a garland of celebrated prayers. She glorified the wonderful guardianship that Krishna offers His devotees, but simultaneously prayed for further calamities, which help the sincere devotee to remember Him. The exalted Queen expressed how true devotion is born in the hearts of those who are materially exhausted, praying that her affectionate family ties would not hinder her spiritual progress. She praised the Lord’s divine appearance, which creates a spiritual resurgence, but lamented the impending separation from Krishna. That Queen Kunti never lost faith in Krishna, despite so many catastrophic reversals, indicates the incomparable degree of love and devotion that she exuded.

Previous The Love of Uttara Next The Love of Bhismadeva Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Uttara

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Uttara Chapter 8 Following this incident, Krishna performed the funeral rites for the countless soldiers who died in the battle of Kuruksetra. The Lord then prepared to leave for Dwaraka. Just then, Asvatthama directed another deadly brahmastra toward the pregnant Uttara (wife of Abhimanyu, Arjuna’s son) in a last-gasp attempt to terminate the final heir in the Pandava dynasty. Another shocking reversal! Though personally detached from the impending danger, Uttara desperately begged Krishna to save the child in her womb. Just like Arjuna, she knew only Krishna as the Supreme controller and the Supreme friend. Always ready to serve His unalloyed devotees, Krishna, as Paramatma (Supersoul in the heart), covered and protected the embryo with His personal energy, and simultaneously foiled the brahmastra weapon.

Previous The Love of Arjuna Next The Love of Kunti Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.1

↗
సూత ఉవాచ ఇతి భీత: ప్రజాద్రోహాత్సర్వధర్మవివిత్సయా । తతో వినశనం ప్రాగాద్ యత్ర దేవవ్రతోఽపతత్ ॥ ౧ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
iti bhītaḥ prajā-drohāt
[iti bheetah prajaa-drohaat]
sarva-dharma-vivitsayā
[sarva-dharma-vivitsayaa]
tato vinaśanaṁ prāgād
[tato vinashanam praagaad]
yatra deva-vrato ’patat
[yatra deva-vrato ’patat]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said iti — thus bhītaḥ — being afraid of prajā-drohāt — because of killing the subjects sarva — all dharma — acts of religion vivitsayā — for understanding tataḥ — thereafter vinaśanam — the place where the fight was held prāgāt — he went yatra — where deva-vrataḥ — Bhīṣmadeva apatat — lay down for passing away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
iti bhītaḥ prajā-drohāt
iti
thus
bhītaḥ
being afraid of
prajā-drohāt
because of killing the subjects
sarva-dharma-vivitsayā
sarva
all
dharma
acts of religion
vivitsayā
for understanding
tato vinaśanaṁ prāgād
tataḥ
thereafter
vinaśanam
the place where the fight was held
prāgāt
he went
yatra deva-vrato ’patat
yatra
where
deva-vrataḥ
Bhīṣmadeva
apatat
lay down for passing away.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Being afraid for having killed so many subjects on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira went to the scene of the massacre. There, Bhīṣmadeva was lying on a bed of arrows, about to pass away.

In this Ninth Chapter, as it is willed by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, Bhīṣmadeva will impart instructions to King Yudhiṣṭhira on the subject of occupational duties. Bhīṣmadeva will also offer his last prayer to the Lord on the verge of passing away from this mortal world and thus become liberated from the bondage of further material engagements. Bhīṣmadeva was endowed with the power of leaving his material body at will, and his lying down on the bed of arrows was his own choice. This passing away of the great warrior attracted the attention of all the contemporary elites, and all of them assembled there to show their feelings of love, respect and affection for the great soul.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Being fearful because of having committed violence against the population, Yudhiṣṭhira, desiring to examine all dharmas, went to Kurukṣetra where Bhīṣma had fallen.
Commentary

In the ninth chapter Bhīṣma sees Kṛṣṇa, and at his request speaks on dharma. Being praised profusely, filled with devotion, he attains the Lord.

When all present agreed that the correct advice was to ask Bhīṣma - who knew all dharmas - whether Yudhiṣṭhira had lost his sense of judgment, Yudhiṣṭhira went to Kurukṣetra to meet Bhīṣma. Vivitsayā means with a desire to examine. Vinaśanam refers to Kurukṣetra. Devavrataḥ is Bhīṣma.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.2

↗
తదా తే భ్రాతర: సర్వే సదశ్వై: స్వర్ణభూషితై: । అన్వగచ్ఛన్ రథైర్విప్రా వ్యాసధౌమ్యాదయస్తథా ॥ ౨ ॥
tadā te bhrātaraḥ sarve
[tadaa te bhraatarah sarve]
sadaśvaiḥ svarṇa-bhūṣitaiḥ
[sadashvaih svarna-bhooshitaih]
anvagacchan rathair viprā
[anvagachchan rathair vipraa]
vyāsa-dhaumyādayas tathā
[vyaasa-dhaumyaadayas tathaa]
tadā — at that time te — all of them bhrātaraḥ — the brothers sarve — all together sat-aśvaiḥ — drawn by first-class horses svarṇa — gold bhūṣitaiḥ — being decorated with anvagacchan — followed one after another rathaiḥ — on the chariots viprāḥ — O brāhmaṇas vyāsa — the sage Vyāsa dhaumya — Dhaumya ādayaḥ — and others tathā — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadā te bhrātaraḥ sarve
tadā
at that time
te
all of them
bhrātaraḥ
the brothers
sarve
all together
sadaśvaiḥ svarṇa-bhūṣitaiḥ
sat-aśvaiḥ
drawn by first-class horses
svarṇa
gold
bhūṣitaiḥ
being decorated with
anvagacchan rathair viprā
anvagacchan
followed one after another
rathaiḥ
on the chariots
viprāḥ
O brāhmaṇas
vyāsa-dhaumyādayas tathā
vyāsa
the sage Vyāsa
dhaumya
Dhaumya
ādayaḥ
and others
tathā
also.
At that time all his brothers followed him on beautiful chariots drawn by first-class horses decorated with gold ornaments. With them were Vyāsa and ṛṣis like Dhaumya [the learned priest of the Pāṇḍavas] and others.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His brother and brāhmaṇas such as Vyāsa and Dhaumya followed behind with chariots decorated with gold and fine horses.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.3

↗
భగవానపి విప్రర్షే రథేన సధనఞ్జయ: । స తైర్వ్యరోచత నృప: కువేర ఇవ గుహ్యకై: ॥ ౩ ॥
bhagavān api viprarṣe
[bhagavaan api viprarshe]
rathena sa-dhanaṣjayaḥ
[rathena sa-dhanashjayah]
sa tair vyarocata nṛpaḥ
[sa tair vyarochata nripah]
kuvera iva guhyakaiḥ
[kuvera iva guhyakaih]
bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead (Śrī Kṛṣṇa) api — also vipra-ṛṣe — O sage among the brāhmaṇas rathena — on the chariot sa-dhanaṣjayaḥ — with Dhanaṣjaya (Arjuna) saḥ — He taiḥ — by them vyarocata — appeared to be highly aristocratic nṛpaḥ — the King (Yudhiṣṭhira) kuvera — Kuvera, the treasurer of the demigods iva — as guhyakaiḥ — companions known as Guhyakas.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhagavān api viprarṣe
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead (Śrī Kṛṣṇa)
api
also
vipra-ṛṣe
O sage among the brāhmaṇas
rathena sa-dhanaṣjayaḥ
rathena
on the chariot
sa-dhanaṣjayaḥ
with Dhanaṣjaya (Arjuna)
sa tair vyarocata nṛpaḥ
saḥ
He
taiḥ
by them
vyarocata
appeared to be highly aristocratic
nṛpaḥ
the King (Yudhiṣṭhira)
kuvera iva guhyakaiḥ
kuvera
Kuvera, the treasurer of the demigods
iva
as
guhyakaiḥ
companions known as Guhyakas.
O sage amongst the brāhmaṇas, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, also followed, seated on a chariot with Arjuna. Thus King Yudhiṣṭhira appeared very aristocratic, like Kuvera surrounded by his companions [the Guhyakas].

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa wanted the Pāṇḍavas to be present before Bhīṣmadeva in the most aristocratic order so that he might be pleased to see them happy at the time of his death. Kuvera is the richest of all the demigods, and herein King Yudhiṣṭhira appeared like him (Kuvera), for the procession along with Śrī Kṛṣṇa was quite appropriate to the royalty of King Yudhiṣṭhira.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! The Lord along with Arjuna also followed behind in his chariot. King Yudhiṣṭhira shone like the god of wealth Kuvera accompanied by the Guhyakas, guardians of his treasures.
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa also followed behind Yudhiṣṭhira.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.4

↗
ద‍ృష్ట్వా నిపతితం భూమౌ దివశ్‍చ్యుతమివామరమ్ । ప్రణేము: పాణ్డవా భీష్మం సానుగా: సహ చక్రిణా ॥ ౪ ॥
dṛṣṭvā nipatitaṁ bhūmau
[drishtvaa nipatitam bhoomau]
divaś cyutam ivāmaram
[divash chyutam ivaamaram]
praṇemuḥ pāṇḍavā bhīṣmaṁ
[pranemuh paandavaa bheeshmam]
sānugāḥ saha cakriṇā
[saanugaah saha chakrinaa]
dṛṣṭvā — thus seeing nipatitam — lying down bhūmau — on the ground divaḥ — from the sky cyutam — fallen iva — like amaram — demigod praṇemuḥ — bowed down pāṇḍavāḥ — the sons of Pāṇḍu bhīṣmam — unto Bhīṣma sa-anugāḥ — with the younger brothers saha — also with cakriṇā — the Lord (carrying the disc).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛṣṭvā nipatitaṁ bhūmau
dṛṣṭvā
thus seeing
nipatitam
lying down
bhūmau
on the ground
divaś cyutam ivāmaram
divaḥ
from the sky
cyutam
fallen
iva
like
amaram
demigod
praṇemuḥ pāṇḍavā bhīṣmaṁ
praṇemuḥ
bowed down
pāṇḍavāḥ
the sons of Pāṇḍu
bhīṣmam
unto Bhīṣma
sānugāḥ saha cakriṇā
sa-anugāḥ
with the younger brothers
saha
also with
cakriṇā
the Lord (carrying the disc).
Seeing him [Bhīṣma] lying on the ground, like a demigod fallen from the sky, the Pāṇḍava King Yudhiṣṭhira, along with his younger brothers and Lord Kṛṣṇa, bowed down before him.

Lord Kṛṣṇa was also a younger cousin of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira as well as the intimate friend of Arjuna. But all the family members of the Pāṇḍavas knew Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord, although conscious of His supreme position, always behaved in a humanly custom, and so He also bowed down before the dying Bhīṣmadeva as if He were one of the younger brothers of King Yudhiṣṭhira.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing Bhīṣma lying on the ground like a fallen devatā, the Pāṇḍavas offered respects to him along with their followers and Kṛṣṇa.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.5

↗
తత్ర బ్రహ్మర్షయ: సర్వే దేవర్షయశ్చ సత్తమ । రాజర్షయశ్చ తత్రాసన్ ద్రష్టుం భరతపుఙ్గవమ్ ॥ ౫ ॥
tatra brahmarṣayaḥ sarve
[tatra brahmarshayah sarve]
devarṣayaś ca sattama
[devarshayash cha sattama]
rājarṣayaś ca tatrāsan
[raajarshayash cha tatraasan]
draṣṭuṁ bharata-puṅgavam
[drashtum bharata-pungavam]
tatra — there brahma-ṛṣayaḥ — ṛṣis among the brāhmaṇas sarve — all deva-ṛṣayaḥ — ṛṣis among the demigods ca — and sattama — situated in the quality of goodness rāja-ṛṣayaḥ — ṛṣis among the kings ca — and tatra — in that place āsan — were present draṣṭum — just to see bharata — the descendants of King Bharata puṅgavam — the chief of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra brahmarṣayaḥ sarve
tatra
there
brahma-ṛṣayaḥ
ṛṣis among the brāhmaṇas
sarve
all
devarṣayaś ca sattama
deva-ṛṣayaḥ
ṛṣis among the demigods
ca
and
sattama
situated in the quality of goodness
rājarṣayaś ca tatrāsan
rāja-ṛṣayaḥ
ṛṣis among the kings
ca
and
tatra
in that place
āsan
were present
draṣṭuṁ bharata-puṅgavam
draṣṭum
just to see
bharata
the descendants of King Bharata
puṅgavam
the chief of.
Just to see the chief of the descendants of King Bharata [Bhīṣma], all the great souls in the universe, namely the ṛṣis amongst the demigods, brāhmaṇas and kings, all situated in the quality of goodness, were assembled there.

The ṛṣis are those who have attained perfection by spiritual achievements. Such spiritual achievements can be earned by all, whether one is a king or a mendicant. Bhīṣmadeva himself was also one of the brahmarṣis and the chief of the descendants of King Bharata. All ṛṣis are situated in the quality of goodness. All of them assembled there on hearing the news of the great warrior’s impending death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! There the brāhmaṇa sages, the sages of the heavenly planets and the kings who were sages had gathered to see the best of the Bharata lineage.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.6-7

↗
పర్వతో నారదో ధౌమ్యో భగవాన్ బాదరాయణ: । బృహదశ్వో భరద్వాజ: సశిష్యో రేణుకాసుత: ॥ ౬ ॥ వసిష్ఠ ఇన్ద్రప్రమదస్త్రితో గృత్సమదోఽసిత: । కక్షీవాన్ గౌతమోఽత్రిశ్చ కౌశికోఽథ సుదర్శన: ॥ ౭ ॥
parvato nārado dhaumyo
[parvato naarado dhaumyo]
bhagavān bādarāyaṇaḥ
[bhagavaan baadaraayanah]
bṛhadaśvo bharadvājaḥ
[brihadashvo bharadvaajah]
saśiṣyo reṇukā-sutaḥ
[sashishyo renukaa-sutah]
vasiṣṭha indrapramadas
[vasishtha indrapramadas]
trito gṛtsamado ’sitaḥ
[trito gritsamado ’sitah]
kakṣīvān gautamo ’triś ca
[kaksheevaan gautamo ’trish cha]
kauśiko ’tha sudarśanaḥ
[kaushiko ’tha sudarshanah]
parvataḥ — Parvata Muni nāradaḥ — Nārada Muni dhaumyaḥ — Dhaumya bhagavān — incarnation of Godhead bādarāyaṇaḥ — Vyāsadeva bṛhadaśvaḥ — Bṛhadaśva bharadvājaḥ — Bharadvāja sa-śiṣyaḥ — along with disciples reṇukā-sutaḥ — Paraśurāma vasiṣṭhaḥ — Vasiṣṭha indrapramadaḥ — Indrapramada tritaḥ — Trita gṛtsamadaḥ — Gṛtsamada asitaḥ — Asita kakṣīvān — Kakṣīvān gautamaḥ — Gautama atriḥ — Atri ca — and kauśikaḥ — Kauśika atha — as well as sudarśanaḥ — Sudarśana.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
parvato nārado dhaumyo
parvataḥ
Parvata Muni
nāradaḥ
Nārada Muni
dhaumyaḥ
Dhaumya
bhagavān bādarāyaṇaḥ
bhagavān
incarnation of Godhead
bādarāyaṇaḥ
Vyāsadeva
bṛhadaśvo bharadvājaḥ
bṛhadaśvaḥ
Bṛhadaśva
bharadvājaḥ
Bharadvāja
saśiṣyo reṇukā-sutaḥ
sa-śiṣyaḥ
along with disciples
reṇukā-sutaḥ
Paraśurāma
vasiṣṭha indrapramadas
vasiṣṭhaḥ
Vasiṣṭha
indrapramadaḥ
Indrapramada
trito gṛtsamado ’sitaḥ
tritaḥ
Trita
gṛtsamadaḥ
Gṛtsamada
kakṣīvān gautamo ’triś ca
kauśiko ’tha sudarśanaḥ
asitaḥ
Asita
kakṣīvān
Kakṣīvān
gautamaḥ
Gautama
atriḥ
Atri
ca
and
kauśikaḥ
Kauśika
atha
as well as
sudarśanaḥ
Sudarśana.
All the sages like Parvata Muni, Nārada, Dhaumya, Vyāsa the incarnation of God, Bṛhadaśva, Bharadvāja and Paraśurāma and disciples, Vasiṣṭha, Indrapramada, Trita, Gṛtsamada, Asita, Kakṣīvān, Gautama, Atri, Kauśika and Sudarśana were present.

Parvata Muni is considered to be one of the oldest sages. He is almost always a constant companion of Nārada Muni. They are also spacemen competent to travel in the air without the help of any material vehicle. Parvata Muni is also a devarṣi, or a great sage amongst the demigods, like Nārada. He was present along with Nārada at the sacrificial ceremony of Mahārāja Janamejaya, son of Mahārāja Parīkṣit. In this sacrifice all the snakes of the world were to be killed. Parvata Muni and Nārada Muni are called Gandharvas also because they can travel in the air singing the glories of the Lord. Since they can travel in the air, they observed Draupadī’s svayaṁvara ceremony (selecting of her own husband) from the air. Like Nārada Muni, Parvata Muni also used to visit the royal assembly in the heaven of King Indra. As a Gandharva, sometimes he visited the royal assembly of Kuvera, one of the important demigods. Both Nārada and Parvata were once in trouble with the daughter of Mahārāja Sṛṣjaya. Mahārāja Sṛṣjaya got the benediction of a son by Parvata Muni.

Nārada Muni is inevitably associated with the narrations of the Purāṇas. He is described in the Bhāgavatam. In his previous life he was the son of a maidservant, but by good association with pure devotees he became enlightened in devotional service, and in the next life he became a perfect man comparable with himself only. In the Mahābhārata his name is mentioned in many places. He is the principal devarṣi, or the chief sage among the demigods. He is the son and disciple of Brahmājī, and from him the disciplic succession in the line of Brahmā has been spread. He initiated Prahlāda Mahārāja, Dhruva Mahārāja and many celebrated devotees of the Lord. He initiated even Vyāsadeva, the author of the Vedic literatures, and from Vyāsadeva, Madhvācārya was initiated, and thus the Madhva sampradāya, in which the Gauḍīya sampradāya is also included, has spread all over the universe. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu belonged to this Madhva sampradāya; therefore, Brahmājī, Nārada, Vyāsa, down to Madhva, Caitanya and the Gosvāmīs all belonged to the same line of disciplic succession. Nāradajī has instructed many kings from time immemorial. In the Bhāgavatam we can see that he instructed Prahlāda Mahārāja while he was in the womb of his mother, and he instructed Vasudeva, father of Kṛṣṇa, as well as Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.

Dhaumya: A great sage who practiced severe penances at Utkocaka Tīrtha and was appointed royal priest of the Pāṇḍava kings. He acted as the priest in many religious functions of the Pāṇḍavas ( saṁskāra ), and also each of the Pāṇḍavas was attended by him at the betrothal of Draupadī. He was present even during the exile of the Pāṇḍavas and used to advise them in circumstances when they were perplexed. He instructed them how to live incognito for one year, and his instructions were strictly followed by the Pāṇḍavas during that time. His name is mentioned also when the general funeral ceremony was performed after the Battle of Kurukṣetra. In the Anuṣāsana-parva of Mahābhārata (127.15-16), he gave very elaborate religious instructions to Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. He was actually the right type of priest of a householder, for he could guide the Pāṇḍavas on the right path of religion. A priest is meant for guiding the householder progressively in the right path of āśrama-dharma, or the occupational duty of a particular caste. There is practically no difference between the family priest and the spiritual master. The sages, saints and brāhmaṇas were especially meant for such functions.

Bādarāyaṇa ( Vyāsadeva ): He is known as Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana, Dvaipāyana, Satyavatī-suta, Pārāśarya, Parāśarātmaja, Bādarāyaṇa, Vedavyāsa, etc. He was the son of Mahāmuni Parāśara in the womb of Satyavatī prior to her betrothal with Mahārāja Śantanu, the father of the great general Grandfather Bhīṣmadeva. He is a powerful incarnation of Nārāyaṇa, and he broadcasts the Vedic wisdom to the world. As such, Vyāsadeva is offered respects before one chants the Vedic literature, especially the Purāṇas. Śukadeva Gosvāmī was his son, and ṛṣis like Vaiśampāyana were his disciples for different branches of the Vedas. He is the author of the great epic Mahābhārata and the great transcendental literature Bhāgavatam. The Brahma-sūtras — the Vedānta-sūtras, or Bādarāyaṇa-sūtras — were compiled by him. Amongst sages he is the most respected author by dint of severe penances. When he wanted to record the great epic Mahābhārata for the welfare of all people in the Age of Kali, he was feeling the necessity of a powerful writer who could take up his dictation. By the order of Brahmājī, Śrī Gaṇeśajī took up the charge of noting down the dictation on the condition that Vyāsadeva would not stop dictation for a moment. The Mahābhārata was thus compiled by the joint endeavor of Vyāsa and Gaṇeśa.

By the order of his mother, Satyavatī, who was later married to Mahārāja Śantanu, and by the request of Bhīṣmadeva, the eldest son of Mahārāja Śantanu by his first wife, the Ganges, he begot three brilliant sons, whose names are Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Pāṇḍu and Vidura. The Mahābhārata was compiled by Vyāsadeva after the Battle of Kurukṣetra and after the death of all the heroes of Mahābhārata. It was first spoken in the royal assembly of Mahārāja Janamejaya, the son of Mahārāja Parīkṣit.

Bṛhadaśva: An ancient sage who used to meet Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira now and then. First of all he met Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira at Kāmyavana. This sage narrated the history of Mahārāja Nala. There is another Bṛhadaśva, who is the son of the Ikṣvāku dynasty ( Mahābhārata, Vana-parva 209.4-5).

Bharadvāja: He is one of the seven great ṛṣis and was present at the time of the birth ceremony of Arjuna. The powerful ṛṣi sometimes undertook severe penances on the shore of the Ganges, and his āśrama is still celebrated at Prayāgadhāma. It is learned that this ṛṣi, while taking bath in the Ganges, happened to meet Ghṛtacī, one of the beautiful society girls of heaven, and thus he discharged semen, which was kept and preserved in an earthen pot and from which Droṇa was born. So Droṇācārya is the son of Bharadvāja Muni. Others say that Bharadvāja the father of Droṇa is a different person from Maharṣi Bharadvāja. He was a great devotee of Brahmā. Once he approached Droṇācārya and requested him to stop the Battle of Kurukṣetra.

Paraśurāma, or Reṇukāsuta: He is the son of Maharṣi Jamadagni and Śrīmatī Reṇukā. Thus he is also known as Reṇukāsuta. He is one of the powerful incarnations of God, and he killed the kṣatriya community as a whole twenty-one times. With the blood of the kṣatriyas he pleased the souls of his forefathers. Later on he underwent severe penances at the Mahendra Parvata. After taking the whole earth from the kṣatriyas, he gave it in charity to Kaśyapa Muni. Paraśurāma instructed the Dhanur-veda, or the science of fighting, to Droṇācārya because he happened to be a brāhmaṇa. He was present during the coronation of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, and he celebrated the function along with other great ṛṣis.

Paraśurāma is so old that he met both Rāma and Kṛṣṇa at different times. He fought with Rāma, but he accepted Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He also praised Arjuna when he saw him with Kṛṣṇa. When Bhīṣma refused to marry Ambā, who wanted him to become her husband, Ambā met Paraśurāma, and by her request only, he asked Bhīṣmadeva to accept her as his wife. Bhīṣma refused to obey his order, although he was one of the spiritual masters of Bhīṣmadeva. Paraśurāma fought with Bhīṣmadeva when Bhīṣma neglected his warning. Both of them fought very severely, and at last Paraśurāma was pleased with Bhīṣma and gave him the benediction of becoming the greatest fighter in the world.

Vasiṣṭha: The great celebrated sage among the brāhmaṇas, well known as the Brahmarṣi Vasiṣṭhadeva. He is a prominent figure in both the Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata periods. He celebrated the coronation ceremony of the Personality of Godhead Śrī Rāma. He was present also on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra. He could approach all the higher and lower planets, and his name is also connected with the history of Hiraṇyakaśipu. There was a great tension between him and Viśvāmitra, who wanted his kāmadhenu, wish-fulfilling cow. Vasiṣṭha Muni refused to spare his kāmadhenu, and for this Viśvāmitra killed his one hundred sons. As a perfect brāhmaṇa he tolerated all the taunts of Viśvāmitra. Once he tried to commit suicide on account of Viśvāmitra’s torture, but all his attempts were unsuccessful. He jumped from a hill, but the stones on which he fell became a stack of cotton, and thus he was saved. He jumped into the ocean, but the waves washed him ashore. He jumped into the river, but the river also washed him ashore. Thus all his suicide attempts were unsuccessful. He is also one of the seven ṛṣis and husband of Arundhatī, the famous star.

Indrapramada: Another celebrated ṛṣi.

Trita: One of the three sons of Prajāpati Gautama. He was the third son, and his other two brothers were known as Ekat and Dvita. All the brothers were great sages and strict followers of the principles of religion. By dint of severe penances they were promoted to Brahmaloka (the planet where Brahmājī lives). Once Trita Muni fell into a well. He was an organizing worker of many sacrifices, and as one of the great sages he also came to show respect to Bhīṣmajī at his deathbed. He was one of the seven sages in the Varuṇaloka. He hailed from the Western countries of the world. As such, most probably he belonged to the European countries. At that time the whole world was under one Vedic culture.

Gṛtsamada: One of the sages of the heavenly kingdom. He was a close friend of Indra, the King of heaven, and was as great as Bṛhaspati. He used to visit the royal assembly of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, and he also visited the place where Bhīṣmadeva breathed his last. Sometimes he explained the glories of Lord Śiva before Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. He was the son of Vitahavya, and he resembled in features the body of Indra. Sometimes the enemies of Indra mistook him to be Indra and arrested him. He was a great scholar of the Ṛg-veda, and thus he was highly respected by the brāhmaṇa community. He lived a life of celibacy and was powerful in every respect.

Asita: There was a king of the same name, but herein the Asita mentioned is the Asita Devala Ṛṣi, a great powerful sage of the time. He explained to his father 1,500,000 verses from the Mahābhārata. He was one of the members in the snake sacrifice of Mahārāja Janamejaya. He was also present during the coronation ceremony of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira along with other great ṛṣis. He also gave Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira instructions while he was on the Aṣjana Hill. He was also one of the devotees of Lord Śiva.

Kakṣīvān: One of the sons of Gautama Muni and the father of the great sage Candakausika. He was one of the members of Parliament of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.

Atri: Atri Muni was a great brāhmaṇa sage and was one of the mental sons of Brahmājī. Brahmājī is so powerful that simply by thinking of a son he can have it. These sons are known as mānasa-putras. Out of seven mānasa-putras of Brahmājī and out of the seven great brāhmaṇa sages, Atri was one. In his family the great Pracetās were also born. Atri Muni had two kṣatriya sons who became kings. King Arthama is one of them. He is counted as one of the twenty-one prajāpatis. His wife’s name was Anasūyā, and he helped Mahārāja Parīkṣit in his great sacrifices.

Kauśika: One of the permanent ṛṣi members in the royal assembly of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. He sometimes met Lord Kṛṣṇa. There are several other sages of the same name.

Sudarśana: This wheel which is accepted by the Personality of Godhead (Viṣṇu or Kṛṣṇa) as His personal weapon is the most powerful weapon, greater than the brahmāstras or similar other disastrous weapons. In some of the Vedic literatures it is said that Agnideva, the fire-god, presented this weapon to Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but factually this weapon is eternally carried by the Lord. Agnideva presented this weapon to Kṛṣṇa in the same way that Rukmiṇī was given by Mahārāja Rukma to the Lord. The Lord accepts such presentations from His devotees, even though such presentations are eternally His property. There is an elaborate description of this weapon in the Ādi-parva of the Mahābhārata. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa used this weapon to kill Śiśupāla, a rival of the Lord. He also killed Śālva by this weapon, and sometimes He wanted His friend Arjuna to use it to kill his enemies ( Mahābhārata, Virāṭa-parva 56.3).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇa! Parvata, Nārada, Dhaumya, Vyāsa, Bṛhadaśva, Bharadvāja, Parāśurāma, Vasiṣṭha, Indrapramada, Trita, Gṛtsamada, Asita, Kakṣivān, Gautama, Atri, Kauśika, Sudarśana, along with their disciples, and as well many other pure sages such as Śuka, Kaśyapa and Bṛhaspati came along with their disciples.
Commentary

Renukā-suta is Paraśurāma. Brahma-rāta is Śukadeva. Āṅgirasa is Bṛhaspati.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.8

↗
అన్యే చ మునయో బ్రహ్మన్ బ్రహ్మరాతాదయోఽమలా: । శిష్యైరుపేతా ఆజగ్ము: కశ్యపాఙ్గిరసాదయ: ॥ ౮ ॥
anye ca munayo brahman
[anye cha munayo brahman]
brahmarātādayo ’malāḥ
[brahmaraataadayo ’malaah]
śiṣyair upetā ājagmuḥ
[shishyair upetaa aajagmuh]
kaśyapāṅgirasādayaḥ
[kashyapaangirasaadayah]
anye — many others ca — also munayaḥ — sages brahman — O brāhmaṇas brahmarāta — Śukadeva Gosvāmī ādayaḥ — and such others amalāḥ — completely purified śiṣyaiḥ — by the disciples upetāḥ — accompanied ājagmuḥ — arrived kaśyapa — Kaśyapa āṅgirasa — Āṅgirasa ādayaḥ — others.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anye ca munayo brahman
anye
many others
ca
also
munayaḥ
sages
brahman
O brāhmaṇas
brahmarātādayo ’malāḥ
brahmarāta
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
ādayaḥ
and such others
amalāḥ
completely purified
śiṣyair upetā ājagmuḥ
śiṣyaiḥ
by the disciples
upetāḥ
accompanied
ājagmuḥ
arrived
kaśyapāṅgirasādayaḥ
kaśyapa
Kaśyapa
āṅgirasa
Āṅgirasa
ādayaḥ
others.
And many others like Śukadeva Gosvāmī and other purified souls, Kaśyapa and Āṅgirasa and others, all accompanied by their respective disciples, arrived there.

Śukadeva Gosvāmī ( Brahmarāta ): The famous son and disciple of Śrī Vyāsadeva, who taught him first the Mahābhārata and then Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śukadeva Gosvāmī recited 1,400,000 verses of the Mahābhārata in the councils of the Gandharvas, Yakṣas and Rākṣasas, and he recited Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for the first time in the presence of Mahārāja Parīkṣit. He thoroughly studied all the Vedic literatures from his great father. Thus he was a completely purified soul by dint of his extensive knowledge in the principles of religion. From Mahābhārata, Sabhā-parva (4.11), it is understood that he was also present in the royal assembly of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and at the fasting of Mahārāja Parīkṣit. As a bona fide disciple of Śrī Vyāsadeva, he inquired from his father very extensively about religious principles and spiritual values, and his great father also satisfied him by teaching him the yoga system by which one can attain the spiritual kingdom, the difference between fruitive work and empiric knowledge, the ways and means of attaining spiritual realization, the four āśramas (namely the student life, the householder’s life, the retired life and the renounced life), the sublime position of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the process of seeing Him face to face, the bona fide candidate for receiving knowledge, the consideration of the five elements, the unique position of intelligence, the consciousness of the material nature and the living entity, the symptoms of the self-realized soul, the working principles of the material body, the symptoms of the influential modes of nature, the tree of perpetual desire, and psychic activities. Sometimes he went to the sun planet with the permission of his father and Nāradajī. Descriptions of his travel in space are given in the Śānti-parva of the Mahābhārata (332). At last he attained the transcendental realm. He is known by different names like Araṇeya, Aruṇisuta, Vaiyāsaki and Vyāsātmaja.

Kaśyapa: One of the prajāpatis, the son of Marīci and one of the sons-in-law of Prajāpati Dakṣa. He is the father of the gigantic bird Garuḍa, who was given elephants and tortoises as eatables. He married thirteen daughters of Prajāpati Dakṣa, and their names are Aditi, Diti, Danu, Kāṣṭhā, Ariṣṭā, Surasā, Ilā, Muni, Krodhavaśā, Tāmrā, Surabhi, Saramā and Timi. He begot many children, both demigods and demons, by those wives. From his first wife, Aditi, all the twelve Ādityas were born; one of them is Vāmana, the incarnation of Godhead. This great sage, Kaśyapa, was also present at the time of Arjuna’s birth. He received a presentation of the whole world from Paraśurāma, and later on he asked Paraśurāma to go out of the world. His other name is Ariṣṭanemi. He lives on the northern side of the universe.

Āṅgirasa: He is the son of Maharṣi Aṅgirā and is known as Bṛhaspati, the priest of the demigods. It is said that Droṇācārya was his partial incarnation. Śukrācārya was the spiritual master of the demons, and Bṛhaspati challenged him. His son is Kaca, and he delivered the fire weapon first to Bharadvāja Muni. He begot six sons (like the fire-god) by his wife Candramāsī, one of the reputed stars. He could travel in space, and therefore he could present himself even in the planets of Brahmaloka and Indraloka. He advised the King of heaven, Indra, about conquering the demons. Once he cursed Indra, who thus had to become a hog on the earth and was unwilling to return to heaven. Such is the power of the attraction of the illusory energy. Even a hog does not wish to part with its earthly possessions in exchange for a heavenly kingdom. He was the religious preceptor of the natives of different planets.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇa! Parvata, Nārada, Dhaumya, Vyāsa, Bṛhadaśva, Bharadvāja, Parāśurāma, Vasiṣṭha, Indrapramada, Trita, Gṛtsamada, Asita, Kakṣivān, Gautama, Atri, Kauśika, Sudarśana, along with their disciples, and as well many other pure sages such as Śuka, Kaśyapa and Bṛhaspati came along with their disciples.
Commentary

Renukā-suta is Paraśurāma. Brahma-rāta is Śukadeva. Āṅgirasa is Bṛhaspati.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.9

↗
తాన్ సమేతాన్ మహాభాగానుపలభ్య వసూత్తమ: । పూజయామాస ధర్మజ్ఞో దేశకాలవిభాగవిత్ ॥ ౯ ॥
tān sametān mahā-bhāgān
[taan sametaan mahaa-bhaagaan]
upalabhya vasūttamaḥ
[upalabhya vasoottamah]
pūjayām āsa dharma-jṣo
[poojayaam aasa dharma-jsho]
deśa-kāla-vibhāgavit
[desha-kaala-vibhaagavit]
tān — all of them sametān — assembled together mahā-bhāgān — all greatly powerful upalabhya — having received vasu-uttamaḥ — the best among the Vasus (Bhīṣmadeva) pūjayām āsa — welcomed dharma-jṣaḥ — one who knows religious principles deśa — place kāla — time vibhāga-vit — one who knows the adjustment of place and time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tān sametān mahā-bhāgān
tān
all of them
sametān
assembled together
mahā-bhāgān
all greatly powerful
upalabhya vasūttamaḥ
upalabhya
having received
vasu-uttamaḥ
the best among the Vasus (Bhīṣmadeva)
pūjayām āsa dharma-jṣo
pūjayām āsa
welcomed
dharma-jṣaḥ
one who knows religious principles
deśa-kāla-vibhāgavit
deśa
place
kāla
time
vibhāga-vit
one who knows the adjustment of place and time.
Bhīṣmadeva, who was the best amongst the eight Vasus, received and welcomed all the great and powerful ṛṣis who were assembled there, for he knew perfectly all the religious principles according to time and place.

Expert religionists know perfectly well how to adjust religious principles in terms of time and place. All the great ācāryas or religious preachers or reformers of the world executed their mission by adjustment of religious principles in terms of time and place. There are different climates and situations in different parts of the world, and if one has to discharge his duties to preach the message of the Lord, he must be expert in adjusting things in terms of the time and place. Bhīṣmadeva was one of the twelve great authorities in preaching this cult of devotional service, and therefore he could receive and welcome all the powerful sages assembled there at his deathbed from all parts of the universe. He was certainly unable at that time to welcome and receive them physically because he was neither at his home nor in a normal healthy condition. But he was quite fit by the activities of his sound mind, and therefore he could utter sweet words with hearty expressions, and all of them were well received. One can perform one’s duty by physical work, by mind and by words. And he knew well how to utilize them in the proper place, and therefore there was no difficulty for him to receive them, although physically unfit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The best of the Vasus, Bhīṣma, endowed with great qualities, knowledgeable of dharma as applicable according to place and time, seeing that they had gathered, worshipped them. [Note: Śrīdhara Svāmī says that since he could not rise, Bhīṣma worshipped them mentally and with words. ]
Commentary

Vasūttama is Bhīṣma.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.10

↗
కృష్ణం చ తత్ప్రభావజ్ఞ ఆసీనం జగదీశ్వరమ్ । హృదిస్థం పూజయామాస మాయయోపాత్తవిగ్రహమ్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
kṛṣṇaṁ ca tat-prabhāva-jṣa
[krishnam cha tat-prabhaava-jsha]
āsīnaṁ jagad-īśvaram
[aaseenam jagad-eeshvaram]
hṛdi-sthaṁ pūjayām āsa
[hridi-stham poojayaam aasa]
māyayopātta-vigraham
[maayayopaatta-vigraham]
kṛṣṇam — unto Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa ca — also tat — of Him prabhāva-jṣaḥ — the knower of the glories (Bhīṣma) āsīnam — sitting jagat-īśvaram — the Lord of the universe hṛdi-stham — situated in the heart pūjayām āsa — worshiped māyayā — by internal potency upātta — manifested vigraham — a form.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛṣṇaṁ ca tat-prabhāva-jṣa
kṛṣṇam
unto Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
ca
also
tat
of Him
prabhāva-jṣaḥ
the knower of the glories (Bhīṣma)
āsīnaṁ jagad-īśvaram
āsīnam
sitting
jagat-īśvaram
the Lord of the universe
hṛdi-sthaṁ pūjayām āsa
hṛdi-stham
situated in the heart
pūjayām āsa
worshiped
māyayā
by internal potency
upātta
manifested
māyayopātta-vigraham
vigraham
a form.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is situated in everyone’s heart, yet He manifests His transcendental form by His internal potency. This very Lord was sitting before Bhīṣmadeva, and since Bhīṣmadeva knew of His glories, he worshiped Him duly.

The Lord’s omnipotency is displayed by His simultaneous presence in every place. He is present always in His eternal abode Goloka Vṛndāvana, and still He is present in everyone’s heart and even within every invisible atom. When He manifests His eternal transcendental form in the material world, He does so by His internal potency. The external potency, or the material energy, has nothing to do with His eternal form. All these truths were known to Śrī Bhīṣmadeva, who worshiped Him accordingly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Bhīṣma, understanding Kṛṣṇa’s powers, worshipped Kṛṣṇa, the lord of the universe, situated within the heart, who was seated there and who had come before Bhīṣma out of great mercy.
Commentary

Māyayopātta-vigraham can mean Kṛṣṇa who had a conflict (vigraha) with Yudhiṣṭhira by covering up his discrimination with his yoga-māyā. Or it means Kṛṣṇa who brought himself before the eyes of Bhīṣma (upātta) by his mercy (māyayā).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.11

↗
పాణ్డుపుత్రానుపాసీనాన్ ప్రశ్రయప్రేమసఙ్గతాన్ । అభ్యాచష్టానురాగాశ్రైరన్ధీభూతేన చక్షుషా ॥ ౧౧ ॥
pāṇḍu-putrān upāsīnān
[paandu-putraan upaaseenaan]
praśraya-prema-saṅgatān
[prashraya-prema-sangataan]
abhyācaṣṭānurāgāśrair
[abhyaachashtaanuraagaashrair]
andhībhūtena cakṣuṣā
[andheebhootena chakshushaa]
pāṇḍu — the late father of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers putrān — the sons of upāsīnān — sitting silently nearby praśraya — being overtaken prema — in feelings of love saṅgatān — having gathered abhyācaṣṭa — congratulated anurāga — feelingly aśraiḥ — by tears of ecstasy andhībhūtena — overwhelmed cakṣuṣā — with his eyes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pāṇḍu-putrān upāsīnān
pāṇḍu
the late father of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers
putrān
the sons of
upāsīnān
sitting silently nearby
praśraya-prema-saṅgatān
praśraya
being overtaken
prema
in feelings of love
saṅgatān
having gathered
abhyācaṣṭānurāgāśrair
abhyācaṣṭa
congratulated
anurāga
feelingly
aśraiḥ
by tears of ecstasy
andhībhūtena cakṣuṣā
andhībhūtena
overwhelmed
cakṣuṣā
with his eyes.
The sons of Mahārāja Pāṇḍu were sitting silently nearby, overtaken with affection for their dying grandfather. Seeing this, Bhīṣmadeva congratulated them with feeling. There were tears of ecstasy in his eyes, for he was overwhelmed by love and affection.

When Mahārāja Pāṇḍu died, his sons were all small children, and naturally they were brought up under the affection of elderly members of the royal family, specifically by Bhīṣmadeva. Later on, when the Pāṇḍavas were grown up, they were cheated by cunning Duryodhana and company, and Bhīṣmadeva, although he knew that the Pāṇḍavas were innocent and were unnecessarily put into trouble, could not take the side of the Pāṇḍavas for political reasons. At the last stage of his life, when Bhīṣmadeva saw his most exalted grandsons, headed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, sitting very gently at his side, the great warrior-grandfather could not check his loving tears, which were automatically flowing from his eyes. He remembered the great tribulations suffered by his most pious grandsons. Certainly he was the most satisfied man because of Yudhiṣṭhira’s being enthroned in place of Duryodhana, and thus he began to congratulate them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His eyes blinded by tears of love, he spoke to the Pāṇḍavas sitting there, filled with humility and love.
Commentary

Abhyācaṣta means “he spoke.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.12

↗
అహో కష్టమహోఽన్యాయ్యం యద్యూయం ధర్మనన్దనా: । జీవితుం నార్హథ క్లిష్టం విప్రధర్మాచ్యుతాశ్రయా: ॥ ౧౨ ॥
aho kaṣṭam aho ’nyāyyaṁ
[aho kashtam aho ’nyaayyam]
yad yūyaṁ dharma-nandanāḥ
[yad yooyam dharma-nandanaah]
jīvituṁ nārhatha kliṣṭaṁ
[jeevitum naarhatha klishtam]
vipra-dharmācyutāśrayāḥ
[vipra-dharmaachyutaashrayaah]
aho — oh kaṣṭam — what terrible sufferings aho — oh anyāyyam — what terrible injustice yat — because yūyam — all of you good souls dharma-nandanāḥ — sons of religion personified jīvitum — to remain alive na — never arhatha — deserve kliṣṭam — suffering vipra — brāhmaṇas dharma — piety acyuta — God āśrayāḥ — being protected by.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho kaṣṭam aho ’nyāyyaṁ
aho
oh
kaṣṭam
what terrible sufferings
aho
oh
yad yūyaṁ dharma-nandanāḥ
anyāyyam
what terrible injustice
jīvituṁ nārhatha kliṣṭaṁ
vipra-dharmācyutāśrayāḥ
yat
because
yūyam
all of you good souls
dharma-nandanāḥ
sons of religion personified
jīvitum
to remain alive
na
never
arhatha
deserve
kliṣṭam
suffering
vipra
brāhmaṇas
dharma
piety
acyuta
God
āśrayāḥ
being protected by.
Bhīṣmadeva said: Oh, what terrible sufferings and what terrible injustices you good souls suffer for being the sons of religion personified. You did not deserve to remain alive under those tribulations, yet you were protected by the brāhmaṇas, God and religion.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was disturbed due to the great massacre in the Battle of Kurukṣetra. Bhīṣmadeva could understand this, and therefore he spoke first of the terrible sufferings of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. He was put into difficulty by injustice only, and the Battle of Kurukṣetra was fought just to counteract this injustice. Therefore, he should not regret the great massacre. He wanted to point out particularly that they were always protected by the brāhmaṇas, the Lord and religious principles. As long as they were protected by these three important items, there was no cause of disappointment. Thus Bhīṣmadeva encouraged Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to dissipate his despondency. As long as a person is fully in cooperation with the wishes of the Lord, guided by the bona fide brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas and strictly following religious principles, one has no cause for despondency, however trying the circumstances of life. Bhīṣmadeva, as one of the authorities in the line, wanted to impress this point upon the Pāṇḍavas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having the shelter of brāhmaṇas, dharma and Kṛṣṇa, you should not live your life in suffering since that is dangerous and improper.
Commentary

The words “dangerous” (kaṣṭam) and “improper” (anyāyyam) do not really apply to the king. To whom do the words refer? The improper situation has arisen because of Viṣṇu, the mover and maintainer of the whole universe. You should not live your life in suffering (kliṣṭam taken adverbially). If others live like that, that is their concern.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.13

↗
సంస్థితేఽతిరథే పాణ్డౌ పృథా బాలప్రజా వధూ: । యుష్మత్కృతే బహూన్ క్లేశాన్ ప్రాప్తా తోకవతీ ముహు: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
saṁsthite ’tirathe pāṇḍau
[samsthite ’tirathe paandau]
pṛthā bāla-prajā vadhūḥ
[prithaa baala-prajaa vadhooh]
yuṣmat-kṛte bahūn kleśān
[yushmat-krite bahoon kleshaan]
prāptā tokavatī muhuḥ
[praaptaa tokavatee muhuh]
saṁsthite — after the demise ati-rathe — of the great general pāṇḍau — Pāṇḍu pṛthā — Kuntī bāla-prajā — having young children vadhūḥ — my daughter-in-law yuṣmat-kṛte — on your account bahūn — multifarious kleśān — afflictions prāptā — underwent toka-vatī — in spite of having grown-up boys muhuḥ — constantly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saṁsthite ’tirathe pāṇḍau
saṁsthite
after the demise
ati-rathe
of the great general
pāṇḍau
Pāṇḍu
pṛthā bāla-prajā vadhūḥ
pṛthā
Kuntī
bāla-prajā
having young children
vadhūḥ
my daughter-in-law
yuṣmat-kṛte bahūn kleśān
yuṣmat-kṛte
on your account
bahūn
multifarious
kleśān
afflictions
prāptā tokavatī muhuḥ
prāptā
underwent
toka-vatī
in spite of having grown-up boys
muhuḥ
constantly.
As far as my daughter-in-law Kuntī is concerned, upon the great General Pāṇḍu’s death, she became a widow with many children, and therefore she suffered greatly. And when you were grown up she suffered a great deal also because of your actions.

The sufferings of Kuntīdevī are doubly lamented. She suffered greatly because of early widowhood and to get her minor children brought up in the royal family. And when her children were grown up, she continued to suffer because of her sons’ actions. So her sufferings continued. This means that she was destined to suffer by providence, and this one has to tolerate without being disturbed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the great warrior Pāṇḍu died, his wife Kuntī with young children constantly underwent many difficulties in raising you since you were young at that time.
Commentary

“What was the suffering?” This verse describes it. Being alone with young children causes much suffering. Though you are now grown up, she underwent great suffering with you as a young child.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.14

↗
సర్వం కాలకృతం మన్యే భవతాం చ యదప్రియమ్ । సపాలో యద్వశే లోకో వాయోరివ ఘనావలి: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
sarvaṁ kāla-kṛtaṁ manye
[sarvam kaala-kritam manye]
bhavatāṁ ca yad-apriyam
[bhavataam cha yad-apriyam]
sapālo yad-vaśe loko
[sapaalo yad-vashe loko]
vāyor iva ghanāvaliḥ
[vaayor iva ghanaavalih]
sarvam — all this kāla-kṛtam — done by inevitable time manye — I think bhavatām ca — for you also yat — whatever apriyam — detestable sa-pālaḥ — with the rulers yat-vaśe — under the control of that time lokaḥ — everyone in every planet vāyoḥ — the wind carries iva — as ghana-āvaliḥ — a line of clouds.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarvaṁ kāla-kṛtaṁ manye
sarvam
all this
kāla-kṛtam
done by inevitable time
manye
I think
bhavatāṁ ca yad-apriyam
bhavatām ca
for you also
yat
whatever
apriyam
detestable
sapālo yad-vaśe loko
sa-pālaḥ
with the rulers
yat-vaśe
under the control of that time
lokaḥ
everyone in every planet
vāyor iva ghanāvaliḥ
vāyoḥ
the wind carries
iva
as
ghana-āvaliḥ
a line of clouds.
In my opinion, this is all due to inevitable time, under whose control everyone in every planet is carried, just as the clouds are carried by the wind.

There is control by time all over the space within the universe, as there is control by time all over the planets. All the big gigantic planets, including the sun, are being controlled by the force of air, as the clouds are carried by the force of air. Similarly, the inevitable kāla, or time, controls even the action of the air and other elements. Everything, therefore, is controlled by the supreme kāla, a forceful representative of the Lord within the material world. Thus Yudhiṣṭhira should not be sorry for the inconceivable action of time. Everyone has to bear the actions and reactions of time as long as one is within the conditions of the material world. Yudhiṣṭhira should not think that he had committed sins in his previous birth and is suffering the consequence. Even the most pious has to suffer the condition of material nature. But a pious man is faithful to the Lord, for he is guided by the bona fide brāhmaṇa and Vaiṣṇava following the religious principles. These three guiding principles should be the aim of life. One should not be disturbed by the tricks of eternal time. Even the great controller of the universe, Brahmājī, is also under the control of that time; therefore, one should not grudge being thus controlled by time despite being a true follower of religious principles.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I consider that this, which is unwelcome, has all been done to you by time, which controls the world and its protectors just as the wind controls the clouds.
Commentary

What is the cause of our suffering? It cannot be said, since I do not see either recent or old karmas as the cause. Therefore Bhīṣma speaks words of the common people.

“But time is simply the substratum of the experience of happiness and distress which are prārabdha-karmas. Thus, when you say that time is the cause, time is acting as an assistant. Why do you not just say clearly that our suffering is our prārabdha-karma resulting from our sins?”

Yudhiṣṭhira is well known as the direct incarnation of dharma. If Dharma (Yudhiṣṭhira) has prārabdha-karmas, how can he have any sense of dharma? The cause is not karma, but time, which cannot be countered and cannot be explained.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.15

↗
యత్ర ధర్మసుతో రాజా గదాపాణిర్వృకోదర: । కృష్ణోఽస్త్రీ గాణ్డివం చాపం సుహృత్కృష్ణస్తతో విపత్ ॥ ౧౫ ॥
yatra dharma-suto rājā
[yatra dharma-suto raajaa]
gadā-pāṇir vṛkodaraḥ
[gadaa-paanir vrikodarah]
kṛṣṇo ’strī gāṇḍivaṁ cāpaṁ
[krishno ’stree gaandivam chaapam]
suhṛt kṛṣṇas tato vipat
[suhrit krishnas tato vipat]
yatra — where there is dharma-sutaḥ — the son of Dharmarāja rājā — the King gadā-pāṇiḥ — with his mighty club in hand vṛkodaraḥ — Bhīma kṛṣṇaḥ — Arjuna astrī — carrier of the weapon gāṇḍivam — Gāṇḍīva cāpam — bow suhṛt — well-wisher kṛṣṇaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead tataḥ — thereof vipat — reverse.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yatra dharma-suto rājā
yatra
where there is
dharma-sutaḥ
the son of Dharmarāja
rājā
the King
gadā-pāṇir vṛkodaraḥ
gadā-pāṇiḥ
with his mighty club in hand
vṛkodaraḥ
Bhīma
kṛṣṇo ’strī gāṇḍivaṁ cāpaṁ
kṛṣṇaḥ
Arjuna
suhṛt kṛṣṇas tato vipat
astrī
carrier of the weapon
gāṇḍivam
Gāṇḍīva
cāpam
bow
suhṛt
well-wisher
kṛṣṇaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead
tataḥ
thereof
vipat
reverse.
Oh, how wonderful is the influence of inevitable time! It is irreversible — otherwise, how can there be reverses in the presence of King Yudhiṣṭhira, the son of the demigod controlling religion; Bhīma, the great fighter with a club; the great bowman Arjuna with his mighty weapon Gāṇḍīva; and above all, the Lord, the direct well-wisher of the Pāṇḍavas?

As far as the material or spiritual resources were required, there was no scarcity in the case of the Pāṇḍavas. Materially they were well equipped because two great warriors, namely Bhīma and Arjuna, were there. Spiritually the King himself was the symbol of religion, and above all of them the Personality of Godhead, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, was personally concerned with their affairs as the well-wisher. And yet there were so many reverses on the side of the Pāṇḍavas. Despite the power of pious acts, the power of personalities, the power of expert management and the power of weapons under the direct supervision of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Pāṇḍavas suffered so many practical reverses, which can only be explained as due to the influence of kāla, inevitable time. Kāla is identical with the Lord Himself, and therefore the influence of kāla indicates the inexplicable wish of the Lord Himself. There is nothing to be lamented when a matter is beyond the control of any human being.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You are lamenting where there is Yudhiṣṭhira, the son of Dharma, Bhīma, holder of the club, Arjuna holder of the bow Gāṇḍiva, and your friend Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

“Kapila has said:

na karhicin mat-parāḥ śānta-rūpe naṅkṣyanti no me ’nimiṣo leḍhi hetiḥ yeṣām ahaṁ priya ātmā sutaś ca sakhā guruḥ suhṛdo daivam iṣṭam

The devotees in the spiritual world are deprived of any enjoyment. My wheel of time does not afflict those devotees, for whom I am a lover, the ātmā, son, friend, elder, companion or worshipable deity. SB 3.25.38

How then could time attack the Pāṇḍavas who were filled with dāsya, sakhya and vātsalya for Kṛṣṇa? This is most astonishing! Without a cause, time has produced effects, whose cause we must infer, but which looks similar to karma.” That is the intention of this verse.

Kṛsṇa means Arjuna, with his bow (astrī). Though you have strength of piety, strength of body, strength of skill, strength of scriptural knowledge, strength of friends and strength of wealth, still you lament.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.16

↗
న హ్యస్య కర్హిచిద్రాజన్ పుమాన్ వేద విధిత్సితమ్ । యద్విజిజ్ఞాసయా యుక్తా ముహ్యన్తి కవయోఽపి హి ॥ ౧౬ ॥
na hy asya karhicid rājan
[na hy asya karhichid raajan]
pumān veda vidhitsitam
[pumaan veda vidhitsitam]
yad vijijṣāsayā yuktā
[yad vijijshaasayaa yuktaa]
muhyanti kavayo ’pi hi
[muhyanti kavayo ’pi hi]
na — never hi — certainly asya — His karhicit — whatsoever rājan — O King pumān — anyone veda — knows vidhitsitam — plan yat — which vijijṣāsayā — with exhaustive inquiries yuktāḥ — being engaged muhyanti — bewildered kavayaḥ — great philosophers api — even hi — certainly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na hy asya karhicid rājan
na
never
hi
certainly
pumān veda vidhitsitam
yad vijijṣāsayā yuktā
asya
His
muhyanti kavayo ’pi hi
karhicit
whatsoever
rājan
O King
pumān
anyone
veda
knows
vidhitsitam
plan
yat
which
vijijṣāsayā
with exhaustive inquiries
yuktāḥ
being engaged
muhyanti
bewildered
kavayaḥ
great philosophers
api
even
hi
certainly.
O King, no one can know the plan of the Lord [Śrī Kṛṣṇa]. Even though great philosophers inquire exhaustively, they are bewildered.

The bewilderment of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira over his past sinful acts and the resultant sufferings, etc., is completely negated by the great authority Bhīṣma (one of the twelve authorized persons). Bhīṣma wanted to impress upon Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira that since time immemorial no one, including such demigods as Śiva and Brahmā, could ascertain the real plan of the Lord. So what can we understand about it? It is useless also to inquire about it. Even the exhaustive philosophical inquiries of sages cannot ascertain the plan of the Lord. The best policy is simply to abide by the orders of the Lord without argument. The sufferings of the Pāṇḍavas were never due to their past deeds. The Lord had to execute the plan of establishing the kingdom of virtue, and therefore His own devotees suffered temporarily in order to establish the conquest of virtue. Bhīṣmadeva was certainly satisfied by seeing the triumph of virtue, and he was glad to see King Yudhiṣṭhira on the throne, although he himself fought against him. Even a great fighter like Bhīṣma could not win the Battle of Kurukṣetra because the Lord wanted to show that vice cannot conquer virtue, regardless of who tries to execute it. Bhīṣmadeva was a great devotee of the Lord, but he chose to fight against the Pāṇḍavas by the will of the Lord because the Lord wanted to show that a fighter like Bhīṣma cannot win on the wrong side.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! No one can understand the plan of Kṛṣṇa because even those engaged in reasoning and scripture are bewildered by that inquiry.
Commentary

“So what should I conclude?” Here is the general conclusion. Everyone agrees that no one can interfere with the plans of the Kṛṣṇa and no one can even understand what his plans are, even today. No person, starting with Brahmā and Śiva, knows the plan of the Lord, what to speak of me!

Maybe no one knows. But inquiry is necessary. Does he want to give us suffering? Does he want to give us joy? Does he want to give us suffering and happiness? It cannot be the first, because then his quality of being affectionate to his devotee would be cancelled. It cannot be the second option, because we have not seen any happiness. It cannot be the third option because that would be a contradiction to his kind nature. It is finally decided that one cannot solve the problem by inquiry. Thus the verse says that even those who use their intelligence to discriminate and those use knowledge of scripture are bewildered by inquiry.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.17

↗
తస్మాదిదం దైవతన్త్రం వ్యవస్య భరతర్షభ । తస్యానువిహితోఽనాథా నాథ పాహి ప్రజా: ప్రభో ॥ ౧౭ ॥
tasmād idaṁ daiva-tantraṁ
[tasmaad idam daiva-tantram]
vyavasya bharatarṣabha
[vyavasya bharatarshabha]
tasyānuvihito ’nāthā
[tasyaanuvihito ’naathaa]
nātha pāhi prajāḥ prabho
[naatha paahi prajaah prabho]
tasmāt — therefore idam — this daiva-tantram — enchantment of providence only vyavasya — ascertaining bharata-ṛṣabha — O best among the descendants of Bharata tasya — by Him anuvihitaḥ — as desired anāthāḥ — helpless nātha — O master pāhi — just take care of prajāḥ — of the subjects prabho — O Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmād idaṁ daiva-tantraṁ
tasmāt
therefore
idam
this
daiva-tantram
enchantment of providence only
vyavasya bharatarṣabha
vyavasya
ascertaining
bharata-ṛṣabha
O best among the descendants of Bharata
tasyānuvihito ’nāthā
tasya
by Him
anuvihitaḥ
as desired
anāthāḥ
helpless
nātha
O master
nātha pāhi prajāḥ prabho
pāhi
just take care of
prajāḥ
of the subjects
prabho
O Lord.
O best among the descendants of Bharata [Yudhiṣṭhira], I maintain, therefore, that all this is within the plan of the Lord. Accepting the inconceivable plan of the Lord, you must follow it. You are now the appointed administrative head, and, my lord, you should now take care of those subjects who are now rendered helpless.

The popular saying is that a housewife teaches the daughter-in-law by teaching the daughter. Similarly, the Lord teaches the world by teaching the devotee. The devotee does not have to learn anything new from the Lord because the Lord teaches the sincere devotee always from within. Whenever, therefore, a show is made to teach the devotee, as in the case of the teachings of Bhagavad-gītā, it is for teaching the less intelligent men. A devotee’s duty, therefore, is to ungrudgingly accept tribulations from the Lord as a benediction. The Pāṇḍavas were advised by Bhīṣmadeva to accept the responsibility of administration without hesitation. The poor subjects were without protection due to the Battle of Kurukṣetra, and they were awaiting the assumption of power by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. A pure devotee of the Lord accepts tribulations as favors from the Lord. Since the Lord is absolute, there is no mundane difference between the two.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O master! O controller! Of best of the Bharata lineage! Therefore, discerning that the suffering and happiness is dependent only on Kṛṣṇa, follow him and protect the helpless citizens.
Commentary

Discern (vyavasya) that this happiness and suffering (idam) is dependent on the lord (daiva-tantram), but understand that the purpose of giving happiness and distress to his devotee is not easily understood, since it has already been said that his plan is hard to comprehend. Having discerned this, follow Kṛṣṇa (tasya anuvihitaḥ) and protect the citizens who are without a guide (anāthāḥ) to lead them to Kṛṣṇa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.18

↗
ఏష వై భగవాన్సాక్షాదాద్యో నారాయణ: పుమాన్ । మోహయన్మాయయా లోకం గూఢశ్చరతి వృష్ణిషు ॥ ౧౮ ॥
eṣa vai bhagavān sākṣād
[esha vai bhagavaan saakshaad]
ādyo nārāyaṇaḥ pumān
[aadyo naaraayanah pumaan]
mohayan māyayā lokaṁ
[mohayan maayayaa lokam]
gūḍhaś carati vṛṣṇiṣu
[goodhash charati vrishnishu]
eṣaḥ — this vai — positively bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead sākṣāt — original ādyaḥ — the first nārāyaṇaḥ — the Supreme Lord (who lies down on the water) pumān — the supreme enjoyer mohayan — bewildering māyayā — by His self-created energy lokam — the planets gūḍhaḥ — who is inconceivable carati — moves vṛṣṇiṣu — among the Vṛṣṇi family.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣa vai bhagavān sākṣād
eṣaḥ
this
vai
positively
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
sākṣāt
original
ādyaḥ
the first
ādyo nārāyaṇaḥ pumān
nārāyaṇaḥ
the Supreme Lord (who lies down on the water)
pumān
the supreme enjoyer
mohayan māyayā lokaṁ
mohayan
bewildering
māyayā
by His self-created energy
lokam
the planets
gūḍhaś carati vṛṣṇiṣu
gūḍhaḥ
who is inconceivable
carati
moves
vṛṣṇiṣu
among the Vṛṣṇi family.
This Śrī Kṛṣṇa is no other than the inconceivable, original Personality of Godhead. He is the first Nārāyaṇa, the supreme enjoyer. But He is moving amongst the descendants of King Vṛṣṇi just like one of us, and He is bewildering us with His self-created energy.

The Vedic system of acquiring knowledge is the deductive process. The Vedic knowledge is received perfectly by disciplic succession from authorities. Such knowledge is never dogmatic, as ill conceived by less intelligent persons. The mother is the authority to verify the identity of the father. She is the authority for such confidential knowledge. Therefore, authority is not dogmatic. In the Bhagavad-gītā this truth is confirmed in the second verse of the Fourth Chapter, and the perfect system of learning is to receive it from authority. The very same system is accepted universally as truth, but only the false arguer speaks against it. For example, modern spacecraft fly in the sky, and when scientists say that they travel to the other side of the moon, men believe these stories blindly because they have accepted the modern scientists as authorities. The authorities speak, and the people in general believe them. But in the case of Vedic truths, they have been taught not to believe. Even if they accept them they give a different interpretation. Each and every man wants a direct perception of Vedic knowledge, but foolishly they deny it. This means that the misguided man can believe one authority, the scientist, but will reject the authority of the Vedas. The result is that people have degenerated.

Here is an authority speaking about Śrī Kṛṣṇa as the original Personality of Godhead and the first Nārāyaṇa. Even such an impersonalist as Ācārya Śaṅkara has said in the beginning of his commentation on the Bhagavad-gītā that Nārāyaṇa, the Personality of Godhead, is beyond the material creation.* The universe is one of the material creations, but Nārāyaṇa is transcendental to such material paraphernalia.

Bhīṣmadeva is one of the twelve mahājanas who know the principles of transcendental knowledge. His confirmation of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s being the original Personality of Godhead is also corroborated by the impersonalist Śaṅkara. All other ācāryas have also confirmed this statement, and thus there is no chance of not accepting Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa as the original Personality of Godhead. Bhīṣmadeva says that He is the first Nārāyaṇa. This is also confirmed by Brahmājī in the Bhāgavatam (10.14.14) . Kṛṣṇa is the first Nārāyaṇa. In the spiritual world (Vaikuṇṭha) there are unlimited numbers of Nārāyaṇas, who are all the same Personality of Godhead and are considered to be the plenary expansions of the original Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa. The first form of the Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, first expands Himself as the form of Baladeva, and Baladeva expands in so many other forms, such as Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Vāsudeva, Nārāyaṇa, Puruṣa, Rāma and Nṛsiṁha. All these expansions are one and the same viṣṇu-tattva, and Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the original source of all the plenary expansions. He is therefore the direct Personality of Godhead. He is the creator of the material world, and He is the predominating Deity known as Nārāyaṇa in all the Vaikuṇṭha planets. Therefore, His movements amongst human beings are another sort of bewilderment. The Lord therefore says in the Bhagavad-gītā that foolish persons consider Him to be one of the human beings without knowing the intricacies of His movements.

The bewilderment regarding Śrī Kṛṣṇa is due to the action of His twofold internal and external energies upon the third one, called marginal energy. The living entities are expansions of His marginal energy, and thus they are sometimes bewildered by the internal energy and sometimes by the external energy. By internal energetic bewilderment, Śrī Kṛṣṇa expands Himself into unlimited numbers of Nārāyaṇas and exchanges or accepts transcendental loving service from the living entities in the transcendental world. And by His external energetic expansions, He incarnates Himself in the material world amongst the men, animals or demigods to reestablish His forgotten relation with the living entities in different species of life. Great authorities like Bhīṣma, however, escape His bewilderment by the mercy of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, the original Nārāyaṇa, the puruṣa, who bewilders the world with his energy, secretly moves in the Yādava family.
Commentary

“But how can you say that it is all dependent on the Lord and that no one knows the plan of the Lord, when the Lord is at this moment right in front of you? How can you not know his plan when you can ask him?” In reply, Bhīṣma speaks this verse. “He bewilders us with his energy.” Even if asked by Bhīṣma, the Lord will not speak, but instead will evade him by answering, “Am I so intelligent?” Even if he says something, he still bewilders everyone. Therefore his plan is to be followed, but is not subject to inquiry.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.19

↗
అస్యానుభావం భగవాన్ వేద గుహ్యతమం శివ: । దేవర్షిర్నారద: సాక్షాద్భగవాన్ కపిలో నృప ॥ ౧౯ ॥
asyānubhāvaṁ bhagavān
[asyaanubhaavam bhagavaan]
veda guhyatamaṁ śivaḥ
[veda guhyatamam shivah]
devarṣir nāradaḥ sākṣād
[devarshir naaradah saakshaad]
bhagavān kapilo nṛpa
[bhagavaan kapilo nripa]
asya — of Him anubhāvam — glories bhagavān — the most powerful veda — knows guhya-tamam — very confidentially śivaḥ — Lord Śiva deva-ṛṣiḥ — the great sage among the demigods nāradaḥ — Nārada sākṣāt — directly bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead kapilaḥ — Kapila nṛpa — O King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
asyānubhāvaṁ bhagavān
asya
of Him
anubhāvam
glories
bhagavān
the most powerful
veda guhyatamaṁ śivaḥ
veda
knows
guhya-tamam
very confidentially
śivaḥ
Lord Śiva
devarṣir nāradaḥ sākṣād
deva-ṛṣiḥ
the great sage among the demigods
nāradaḥ
Nārada
sākṣāt
directly
bhagavān kapilo nṛpa
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
kapilaḥ
Kapila
nṛpa
O King.
O King, Lord Śiva, Nārada the sage amongst the demigods, and Kapila, the incarnation of Godhead, all know very confidentially about His glories through direct contact.

Pure devotees of the Lord are all budhās, or persons who know the glories of the Lord in different transcendental loving services. As the Lord has innumerable expansions of His plenary form, there are innumerable pure devotees of the Lord, who are engaged in the exchange of service of different humors. Ordinarily there are twelve great devotees of the Lord, namely Brahmā, Nārada, Śiva, Kumāra, Kapila, Manu, Prahlāda, Bhīṣma, Janaka, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, Bali Mahārāja and Yamarāja. Bhīṣmadeva, although one of them, has mentioned only three important names of the twelve who know the glories of the Lord. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, one of the great ācāryas in the modern age, explains that anubhāva, or the glory of the Lord, is first appreciated by the devotee in ecstasy manifesting the symptoms of perspiring, trembling, weeping, bodily eruptions, etc., which are further enhanced by steady understanding of the glories of the Lord. Such different understandings of bhāvas are exchanged between Yaśodā and the Lord (binding the Lord by ropes) and in the chariot-driving by the Lord in the exchange of love with Arjuna. These glories of the Lord are exhibited in His being subordinated before His devotees, and that is another feature of the glories of the Lord. Śukadeva Gosvāmī and the Kumāras, although situated in the transcendental position, became converted by another feature of bhāva and turned into pure devotees of the Lord. Tribulations imposed upon the devotees by the Lord constitute another exchange of transcendental bhāva between the Lord and the devotees. The Lord says, “I put My devotee into difficulty, and thus the devotee becomes more purified in exchanging transcendental bhāva with Me.” Placing the devotee into material troubles means delivering him from the illusory material relations. The material relations are based on reciprocation of material enjoyment, which depends mainly on material resources. Therefore, when material resources are withdrawn by the Lord, the devotee is cent-percent attracted toward the transcendental loving service of the Lord. Thus the Lord snatches the fallen soul from the mire of material existence. Tribulations offered by the Lord to His devotee are different from the tribulations resulting from vicious action. All these glories of the Lord are especially known to the great mahājanas like Brahmā, Śiva, Nārada, Kapila, Kumāra and Bhīṣma, as mentioned above, and one is able to grasp it by their grace.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O king! Lord Śiva, Nārada, sage of the heavens, and Lord Kapila know the most secret anubhāvas of Kṛṣṇa, though not his intentions.
Commentary

Śiva and others knows particular actions of Kṛṣṇa--those actions he chooses to reveal to them (anubhāvam), but not his intentions, his real form or his real powers. The knower of rasa-śāstras knows first of all anubhāvas and sāttvika-bhāvas - paralysis, perspiration, hair standing on end etc. By that he can understand the sthāyi-bhāva. By the particular qualities and intensity of the anubhāvas, he can understand the particular qualities and intensity of the sthāyi-bhāva. The knower of rasa-śāstra knows the anubhāva of Kṛṣṇa being tied by a rope by the gopīs like Yaśodā, and the dependent anubhāva of Kṛṣṇa being the charioteer for Arjuna, Yudhiṣṭhira and Ugrasena. These are anubhāvas of Kṛṣṇa indicating his dependence on others. The knower of rasa then infers that there exists something special in these cases which controls and melts the heart of even the Supreme Lord, the controller of all, the supremely independent entity. That object, which melts the hearts of the viṣaya and āśraya, which has many varieties, and which brings both parties under the control of the other is called prema. It is the crest jewel of all goals for the human being and is described by terms such as bhakti, sneha and anurāga.

Seeing that Kṛṣṇa is controlled more when he sees his devotees, who generate prema in him, the knower of rasa infers that there is intense prema in the siddha and sādhaka devotees. He then concludes that the Kṛṣṇa is cause of difficulties for devotees, in order to increase their devotion to that level. Śiva, Nārada and Kapila know this. One sees an increase in prema in Draupadī and others when their difficulties increase.

yasyāham anugṛhṇāmi hariṣye tad-dhanaṁ śanaiḥ tato ’dhanaṁ tyajanty asya svajanā duḥkha-duḥkhitam

If I especially favor someone, I gradually deprive him of his wealth. Then the relatives and friends of such a poverty-stricken man abandon him. In this way he suffers one distress after another. SB 10.88.8

Thus the difficulties the devotees experience are not prārabdha-karmas since they are given by the Lord alone, who wants to benefit the devotees. However, this is not an inclusive rule. Sometimes the Lord increases his devotee’s bhakti without giving problems to him. Thus it is said that no one knows the plan of the Lord. Śiva and Nārada know the anubhāvas or symptoms in the Lord. Other foolish people do not know the anubhāvas, like Kṛṣṇa allowing himself to be tied up. They explain it as some sort of fake display.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.20

↗
యం మన్యసే మాతులేయం ప్రియం మిత్రం సుహృత్తమమ్ । అకరో: సచివం దూతం సౌహృదాదథ సారథిమ్ ॥ ౨౦ ॥
yaṁ manyase mātuleyaṁ
[yam manyase maatuleyam]
priyaṁ mitraṁ suhṛttamam
[priyam mitram suhrittamam]
akaroḥ sacivaṁ dūtaṁ
[akaroh sachivam dootam]
sauhṛdād atha sārathim
[sauhridaad atha saarathim]
yam — the person manyase — you think mātuleyam — maternal cousin priyam — very dear mitram — friend suhṛt-tamam — ardent well-wisher akaroḥ — executed sacivam — counsel dūtam — messenger sauhṛdāt — by good will atha — thereupon sārathim — charioteer.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaṁ manyase mātuleyaṁ
yam
the person
manyase
you think
mātuleyam
maternal cousin
priyaṁ mitraṁ suhṛttamam
priyam
very dear
mitram
friend
suhṛt-tamam
ardent well-wisher
akaroḥ sacivaṁ dūtaṁ
akaroḥ
executed
sacivam
counsel
dūtam
messenger
sauhṛdād atha sārathim
sauhṛdāt
by good will
atha
thereupon
sārathim
charioteer.
O King, that personality whom, out of ignorance only, you thought to be your maternal cousin, your very dear friend, well-wisher, counselor, messenger, benefactor, etc., is that very Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, although acting as the cousin, brother, friend, well-wisher, counselor, messenger, benefactor, etc., of the Pāṇḍavas, was still the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Out of His causeless mercy and favor upon His unalloyed devotees, He performs all kinds of service, but that does not mean that He has changed His position as the Absolute Person. To think of Him as an ordinary man is the grossest type of ignorance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You think of Kṛṣṇa as your cousin, as a dear friend, as your selfless helper, and out of affection made him your counselor, messenger, and charioteer.
Commentary

This verse shows Kṛṣṇa’s anubhāvas or actions performed out of deep love. Though Kṛṣṇa is the supreme lord he displays actions indicating that he is under your control by being your counselor and messenger. The verse is actually a continuation of the previous verse: no one knows the actions of Kṛṣṇa whom you consider your cousin and friend.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.21

↗
సర్వాత్మన: సమద‍ృశో హ్యద్వయస్యానహఙ్‍కృతే: । తత్కృతం మతివైషమ్యం నిరవద్యస్య న క్‍వచిత్ ॥ ౨౧ ॥
sarvātmanaḥ sama-dṛśo
[sarvaatmanah sama-drisho]
hy advayasyānahaṅkṛteḥ
[hy advayasyaanahankriteh]
tat-kṛtaṁ mati-vaiṣamyaṁ
[tat-kritam mati-vaishamyam]
niravadyasya na kvacit
[niravadyasya na kvachit]
sarva-ātmanaḥ — of one who is present in everyone’s heart sama-dṛśaḥ — of one who is equally kind to one and all hi — certainly advayasya — of the Absolute anahaṅkṛteḥ — free from all material identity of false ego tat-kṛtam — everything done by Him mati — consciousness vaiṣamyam — differentiation niravadyasya — freed from all attachment na — never kvacit — at any stage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarvātmanaḥ sama-dṛśo
sarva-ātmanaḥ
of one who is present in everyone’s heart
sama-dṛśaḥ
of one who is equally kind to one and all
hi
certainly
advayasya
of the Absolute
hy advayasyānahaṅkṛteḥ
anahaṅkṛteḥ
free from all material identity of false ego
tat-kṛtaṁ mati-vaiṣamyaṁ
tat-kṛtam
everything done by Him
mati
consciousness
vaiṣamyam
differentiation
niravadyasya na kvacit
niravadyasya
freed from all attachment
na
never
kvacit
at any stage.
Being the Absolute Personality of Godhead, He is present in everyone’s heart. He is equally kind to everyone, and He is free from the false ego of differentiation. Therefore whatever He does is free from material inebriety. He is equibalanced.

Because He is absolute, there is nothing different from Him. He is kaivalya; there is nothing except Himself. Everything and everyone is the manifestation of His energy, and thus He is present everywhere by His energy, being nondifferent from it. The sun is identified with every inch of the sun rays and every molecular particle of the rays. Similarly, the Lord is distributed by His different energies. He is Paramātmā, or the Supersoul, present in everyone as the supreme guidance, and therefore He is already the chariot driver and counsel of all living beings. When He, therefore, exhibits Himself as chariot driver of Arjuna, there is no change in His exalted position. It is the power of devotional service only that demonstrates Him as the chariot driver or the messenger. Since He has nothing to do with the material conception of life because He is absolute spiritual identity, there is for Him no superior or inferior action. Being the Absolute Personality of Godhead, He has no false ego, and so He does not identify Himself with anything different from Him. The material conception of ego is equibalanced in Him. He does not feel, therefore, inferior by becoming the chariot driver of His pure devotee. It is the glory of the pure devotee that only he can bring about service from the affectionate Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His actions are not a mistake of his judgment for he is faultless, he is the soul of all beings, he sees all equally, he is without a second, and is without pride.
Commentary

“Becoming a messenger or charioteer because of being controlled by bhakti is a degradation of his position. If he is like that, how can the Lord’s prema give him real happiness?” This verse answers. Kṛṣṇa is without fault, and possesses faultless prema (niravadyasya). His actions like being a messenger (tat-kṛtam) are not a deviation of his mind, because he is at all times the possessor of great powers which accomplish everything automatically. He is the soul of everyone (sarvātmanaḥ), even of Arjuna, since he acts as his charioteer and also fights in the chariot. Because he is the soul of everyone, he sees everyone as equal to himself (sama-dṛśaḥ). Because he is the soul of everyone, there is no one except him (advayasya). Because there is no one else, he has no pride (anahaṅkṛteḥ). Moreover, even a person without great powers, being filled with prema, does not consider his suffering, caused by sinful acts that he alone has performed, to be suffering, because of his prema. Thus the Lord who is full of all powers and is bliss personified can have no suffering from his actions of prema.

You are special examples of prema because this Lord has become your messenger (tat-kṛtam). He is brought under control by your prema.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.22

↗
తథాప్యేకాన్తభక్తేషు పశ్య భూపానుకమ్పితమ్ । యన్మేఽసూంస్త్యజత: సాక్షాత్కృష్ణో దర్శనమాగత: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
tathāpy ekānta-bhakteṣu
[tathaapy ekaanta-bhakteshu]
paśya bhūpānukampitam
[pashya bhoopaanukampitam]
yan me ’sūṁs tyajataḥ sākṣāt
[yan me ’sooms tyajatah saakshaat]
kṛṣṇo darśanam āgataḥ
[krishno darshanam aagatah]
tathāpi — still ekānta — unflinching bhakteṣu — unto the devotees paśya — see here bhū-pa — O King anukampitam — how sympathetic yat — for which me — my asūn — life tyajataḥ — ending sākṣāt — directly kṛṣṇaḥ — the Personality of Godhead darśanam — in my view āgataḥ — has kindly come.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tathāpy ekānta-bhakteṣu
tathāpi
still
ekānta
unflinching
bhakteṣu
unto the devotees
paśya bhūpānukampitam
paśya
see here
bhū-pa
O King
anukampitam
how sympathetic
yan me ’sūṁs tyajataḥ sākṣāt
yat
for which
me
my
asūn
life
tyajataḥ
ending
sākṣāt
directly
kṛṣṇo darśanam āgataḥ
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Personality of Godhead
darśanam
in my view
āgataḥ
has kindly come.
Yet, despite His being equally kind to everyone, He has graciously come before me while I am ending my life, for I am His unflinching servitor.

The Supreme Lord, the Absolute Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, although equal to everyone, is still more inclined to His unflinching devotee who is completely surrendered and knows no one else as his protector and master. Having unflinching faith in the Supreme Lord as one’s protector, friend and master is the natural condition of eternal life. A living entity is so made by the will of the Almighty that he is most happy when placing himself in a condition of absolute dependence.

The opposite tendency is the cause of falldown. The living entity has this tendency of falling down by dint of misidentifying himself as fully independent to lord it over the material world. The root cause of all troubles is there in false egotism. One must draw towards the Lord in all circumstances.

The appearance of Lord Kṛṣṇa at the deathbed of Bhīṣmajī is due to his being an unflinching devotee of the Lord. Arjuna had some bodily relation with Kṛṣṇa because the Lord happened to be his maternal cousin. But Bhīṣma had no such bodily relation. Therefore the cause of attraction was due to the intimate relation of the soul. Yet because the relation of the body is very pleasing and natural, the Lord is more pleased when He is addressed as the son of Mahārāja Nanda, the son of Yaśodā, the lover of Rādhārāṇī. This affinity by bodily relation with the Lord is another feature of reciprocating loving service with the Lord. Bhīṣmadeva is conscious of this sweetness of transcendental humor, and therefore he likes to address the Lord as Vijaya-sakhe, Pārtha-sakhe, etc., exactly like Nanda-nandana or Yaśodā-nandana. The best way to establish our relation in transcendental sweetness is to approach Him through His recognized devotees. One should not try to establish the relation directly; there must be a medium which is transparent and competent to lead us to the right path.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O king! See his mercy to his dedicated devotees! By that mercy he has come before me directly when I am about to leave my body.
Commentary

Tathāpi here means “though it is not possible for me to be like you.” “Still see his mercy to me, by which that form of brahman which is filled with bliss has come near such a low person like me. This is another of his anubhāvas, for it is actually to show mercy to you that he comes to me.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.23

↗
భక్త్యావేశ్య మనో యస్మిన్ వాచా యన్నామ కీర్తయన్ । త్యజన్ కలేవరం యోగీ ముచ్యతే కామకర్మభి: ॥ ౨౩ ॥
bhaktyāveśya mano yasmin
[bhaktyaaveshya mano yasmin]
vācā yan-nāma kīrtayan
[vaachaa yan-naama keertayan]
tyajan kalevaraṁ yogī
[tyajan kalevaram yogee]
mucyate kāma-karmabhiḥ
[muchyate kaama-karmabhih]
bhaktyā — with devout attention āveśya — meditating manaḥ — mind yasmin — in whose vācā — by words yat — Kṛṣṇa nāma — holy name kīrtayan — by chanting tyajan — quitting kalevaram — this material body yogī — the devotee mucyate — gets release kāma-karmabhiḥ — from fruitive activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhaktyāveśya mano yasmin
bhaktyā
with devout attention
āveśya
meditating
manaḥ
mind
yasmin
in whose
vācā yan-nāma kīrtayan
vācā
by words
yat
Kṛṣṇa
nāma
holy name
kīrtayan
by chanting
tyajan kalevaraṁ yogī
tyajan
quitting
kalevaram
this material body
yogī
the devotee
mucyate kāma-karmabhiḥ
mucyate
gets release
kāma-karmabhiḥ
from fruitive activities.
The Personality of Godhead, who appears in the mind of the devotee by attentive devotion and meditation and by chanting of the holy name, releases the devotee from the bondage of fruitive activities at the time of his quitting the material body.

Yoga means concentration of the mind detached from all other subject matter. And actually such concentration is samādhi, or cent-percent engagement in the service of the Lord. And one who concentrates his attention in that manner is called a yogī. Such a yogī devotee of the Lord engages himself twenty-four hours daily in the service of the Lord so that his whole attention is engrossed with the thoughts of the Lord in ninefold devotional service, namely hearing, chanting, remembering, worshiping, praying, becoming a voluntary servant, carrying out orders, establishing a friendly relationship, or offering all that one may possess in the service of the Lord. By such practice of yoga, or linking up in the service of the Lord, one is recognized by the Lord Himself, as it is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā concerning the highest perfectional stage of samādhi. The Lord calls such a rare devotee the best amongst all the yogīs. Such a perfect yogī is enabled by the divine grace of the Lord to concentrate his mind upon the Lord with a perfect sense of consciousness, and thus by chanting His holy name before quitting the body the yogī is at once transferred by the internal energy of the Lord to one of the eternal planets where there is no question of material life and its concomitant factors. In material existence a living being has to endure the material conditions of threefold miseries, life after life, according to his fruitive work. Such material life is produced by material desires only. Devotional service to the Lord does not kill the natural desires of the living being, but they are applied in the right cause of devotional service. This qualifies the desire to be transferred to the spiritual sky. General Bhīṣmadeva is referring to a particular type of yoga called bhakti-yoga, and he was fortunate enough to have the Lord directly in his presence before he quitted his material body. He therefore desired that the Lord stay before his view in the following verses.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devotee whose mind is absorbed in Kṛṣṇa, whose voice chants his name, becomes freed from all karmas on giving up the material body. May that Kṛṣṇa, lord of lords, with glowing lotus face, red eyes and pleasing smile, with four arms, the object of my meditation, remain before me while I drink his beauty and praise him, before giving up this body.
Commentary

May he remain here (pratīkṣatām) until I, after some time, after drinking the sweetness of his beauty with my eyes, after I praise him and reveal what is in my mind, give up my body. May he with four arms, who should at all times be the object of my meditation, since he is my object of worship, with his pleasing form and smile, remain directly in front of my eyes at the time of my passing from the body.

Bhīṣma addressed him as a form with four arms because that was the form of Kṛṣṇa mentioned in the mantra he used during meditation.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.24

↗
స దేవదేవో భగవాన్ ప్రతీక్షతాం కలేవరం యావదిదం హినోమ్యహమ్ । ప్రసన్నహాసారుణలోచనోల్లస- న్ముఖామ్బుజో ధ్యానపథశ్చతుర్భుజ: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
sa deva-devo bhagavān pratīkṣatāṁ
[sa deva-devo bhagavaan prateekshataam]
kalevaraṁ yāvad idaṁ hinomy aham
[kalevaram yaavad idam hinomy aham]
prasanna-hāsāruṇa-locanollasan-
[prasanna-haasaaruna-lochanollasan-]
mukhāmbujo dhyāna-pathaś catur-bhujaḥ
[mukhaambujo dhyaana-pathash chatur-bhujah]
saḥ — He deva-devaḥ — the Supreme Lord of the lords bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead pratīkṣatām — may kindly wait kalevaram — body yāvat — as long as idam — this (material body) hinomi — may quit aham — I prasanna — cheerful hāsa — smiling aruṇa-locana — eyes red like the morning sun ullasat — beautifully decorated mukha-ambujaḥ — the lotus flower of His face dhyāna-pathaḥ — in the path of my meditation catur-bhujaḥ — the four-handed form of Nārāyaṇa (the worshipable Deity of Bhīṣmadeva).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa deva-devo bhagavān pratīkṣatāṁ
saḥ
He
deva-devaḥ
the Supreme Lord of the lords
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
pratīkṣatām
may kindly wait
kalevaraṁ yāvad idaṁ hinomy aham
kalevaram
body
yāvat
as long as
idam
this (material body)
hinomi
may quit
aham
I
prasanna-hāsāruṇa-locanollasan-
prasanna
cheerful
hāsa
smiling
aruṇa-locana
eyes red like the morning sun
ullasat
beautifully decorated
mukhāmbujo dhyāna-pathaś catur-bhujaḥ
mukha-ambujaḥ
the lotus flower of His face
dhyāna-pathaḥ
in the path of my meditation
catur-bhujaḥ
the four-handed form of Nārāyaṇa (the worshipable Deity of Bhīṣmadeva).
May my Lord, who is four-handed and whose beautifully decorated lotus face, with eyes as red as the rising sun, is smiling, kindly await me at that moment when I quit this material body.

Bhīṣmadeva knew well that Lord Kṛṣṇa is the original Nārāyaṇa. His worshipable Deity was four-handed Nārāyaṇa, but he knew that four-handed Nārāyaṇa is a plenary expansion of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Indirectly he desired Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa to manifest Himself in His four-handed feature of Nārāyaṇa. A Vaiṣṇava is always humble in his behavior. Although it was cent-percent certain that Bhīṣmadeva was approaching Vaikuṇṭha-dhāma just after leaving his material body, still as a humble Vaiṣṇava he desired to see the beautiful face of the Lord, for after quitting the present body he might not be in a position to see the Lord any more. A Vaiṣṇava is not puffed up, although the Lord guarantees His pure devotee entrance into His abode. Here Bhīṣmadeva says “as long as I do not quit this body.” This means that the great general would quit the body by his own will; he was not being forced by the laws of nature. He was so powerful that he could stay in his body as long as he desired. He got this benediction from his father. He desired that the Lord stay before him in His four-handed Nārāyaṇa feature so that he might concentrate upon Him and thus be in trance in that meditation. Then his mind might be sanctified with thinking of the Lord. Thus he did not mind wherever he might go. A pure devotee is never very anxious to go back to the kingdom of God. He entirely depends on the good will of the Lord. He is equally satisfied even if the Lord desires him to go to hell. The only desire that a pure devotee entertains is that he may always be in rapt attention with thinking of the lotus feet of the Lord, regardless. Bhīṣmadeva wanted this much only: that his mind be absorbed in thinking of the Lord and that he pass away thus. That is the highest ambition of a pure devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devotee whose mind is absorbed in Kṛṣṇa, whose voice chants his name, becomes freed from all karmas on giving up the material body. May that Kṛṣṇa, lord of lords, with glowing lotus face, red eyes and pleasing smile, with four arms, the object of my meditation, remain before me while I drink his beauty and praise him, before giving up this body.
Commentary

May he remain here (pratīkṣatām) until I, after some time, after drinking the sweetness of his beauty with my eyes, after I praise him and reveal what is in my mind, give up my body. May he with four arms, who should at all times be the object of my meditation, since he is my object of worship, with his pleasing form and smile, remain directly in front of my eyes at the time of my passing from the body.

Bhīṣma addressed him as a form with four arms because that was the form of Kṛṣṇa mentioned in the mantra he used during meditation.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.25

↗
సూత ఉవాచ యుధిష్ఠిరస్తదాకర్ణ్య శయానం శరపఞ్జరే । అపృచ్ఛద్వివిధాన్ధర్మానృషీణాం చానుశ‍ృణ్వతామ్ ॥ ౨౫ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
yudhiṣṭhiras tad ākarṇya
[yudhishthiras tad aakarnya]
śayānaṁ śara-paṣjare
[shayaanam shara-pashjare]
apṛcchad vividhān dharmān
[aprichchad vividhaan dharmaan]
ṛṣīṇāṁ cānuśṛṇvatām
[risheenaam chaanushrinvataam]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said yudhiṣṭhiraḥ — King Yudhiṣṭhira tat — that ākarṇya — hearing śayānam — lying down śara-paṣjare — on the bed of arrows apṛcchat — asked vividhān — multifarious dharmān — duties ṛṣīṇām — of the ṛṣis ca — and anuśṛṇvatām — hearing after.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
yudhiṣṭhiras tad ākarṇya
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
King Yudhiṣṭhira
tat
that
ākarṇya
hearing
śayānaṁ śara-paṣjare
śayānam
lying down
śara-paṣjare
on the bed of arrows
apṛcchat
asked
apṛcchad vividhān dharmān
vividhān
multifarious
dharmān
duties
ṛṣīṇāṁ cānuśṛṇvatām
ṛṣīṇām
of the ṛṣis
ca
and
anuśṛṇvatām
hearing after.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, after hearing Bhīṣmadeva speak in that appealing tone, asked him, in the presence of all the great ṛṣis, about the essential principles of various religious duties.

Bhīṣmadeva, speaking in that appealing tone, convinced Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira that he was very soon passing away. And Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was inspired by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa to ask him of the principles of religion. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa inspired Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to ask Bhīṣmadeva in the presence of many great sages, indicating thereby that the Lord’s devotee like Bhīṣmadeva, although apparently living as a worldly man, is far superior to many great sages, even Vyāsadeva. Another point is that Bhīṣmadeva at that time was not only lying on a deathbed of arrows, but was greatly aggrieved because of that state. One should not have asked him any question at that time, but Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa wanted to prove that His pure devotees are always sound in body and mind by dint of spiritual enlightenment, and thus in any circumstances a devotee of the Lord is in perfect order to speak of the right way of life. Yudhiṣṭhira also preferred to solve his problematic questions by asking Bhīṣmadeva rather than ask anyone else present there who was seemingly more learned than Bhīṣmadeva. This is all due to the arrangement of the great wheel-carrier Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who establishes the glories of His devotee. The father likes to see the son become more famous than himself. The Lord declares very emphatically that worship of His devotee is more valuable than the worship of the Lord Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Yudhiṣṭhira, hearing what he had said, then asked Bhīṣma, lying on a bed of arrows, about various dharmas while the sages were listening.
Commentary

Yudhiṣṭhira, anxious about who would free him from delusion, began to ask Bhīṣma, lying on a bed of arrows. Though one should not ask questions when Bhīṣma is in such a situation, because he had no alternative, he asked.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.26

↗
పురుషస్వభావవిహితాన్ యథావర్ణం యథాశ్రమమ్ । వైరాగ్యరాగోపాధిభ్యామామ్నాతోభయలక్షణాన్ ॥ ౨౬ ॥
puruṣa-sva-bhāva-vihitān
[purusha-sva-bhaava-vihitaan]
yathā-varṇaṁ yathāśramam
[yathaa-varnam yathaashramam]
vairāgya-rāgopādhibhyām
[vairaagya-raagopaadhibhyaam]
āmnātobhaya-lakṣaṇān
[aamnaatobhaya-lakshanaan]
puruṣa — the human being sva-bhāva — by his own acquired qualities vihitān — prescribed yathā — according to varṇam — classification of castes yathā — according to āśramam — orders of life vairāgya — detachment rāga — attachment upādhibhyām — out of such designations āmnāta — systematically ubhaya — both lakṣaṇān — symptoms.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
puruṣa-sva-bhāva-vihitān
puruṣa
the human being
sva-bhāva
by his own acquired qualities
vihitān
prescribed
yathā-varṇaṁ yathāśramam
yathā
according to
varṇam
classification of castes
yathā
according to
āśramam
orders of life
vairāgya-rāgopādhibhyām
vairāgya
detachment
rāga
attachment
upādhibhyām
out of such designations
āmnāta
systematically
ubhaya
both
āmnātobhaya-lakṣaṇān
lakṣaṇān
symptoms.
At Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira’s inquiry, Bhīṣmadeva first defined all the classifications of castes and orders of life in terms of the individual’s qualifications. Then he systematically, in twofold divisions, described counteraction by detachment and interaction by attachment.

The conception of four castes and four orders of life, as planned by the Lord Himself ( Bg. 4.13 ), is to accelerate transcendental qualities of the individual person so that he may gradually realize his spiritual identity and thus act accordingly to get free from material bondage, or conditional life. In almost all the Purāṇas the subject matter is described in the same spirit, and so also in the Mahābhārata it is more elaborately described by Bhīṣmadeva in the Śānti-parva, beginning from the Sixtieth Chapter.

The varṇāśrama-dharma is prescribed for the civilized human being just to train him to successfully terminate human life. Self-realization is distinguished from the life of the lower animals engaged in eating, sleeping, fearing and mating. Bhīṣmadeva advised for all human beings nine qualifications: (1) not to become angry, (2) not to lie, (3) to equally distribute wealth, (4) to forgive, (5) to beget children only by one’s legitimate wife, (6) to be pure in mind and hygienic in body, (7) not to be inimical toward anyone, (8) to be simple, and (9) to support servants or subordinates. One cannot be called a civilized person without acquiring the above-mentioned preliminary qualities. Besides these, the brāhmaṇas (the intelligent men), the administrative men, the mercantile community and the laborer class must acquire special qualities in terms of occupational duties mentioned in all the Vedic scriptures. For the intelligent men, controlling the senses is the most essential qualification. It is the basis of morality. Sex indulgence even with a legitimate wife must also be controlled, and thereby family control will automatically follow. An intelligent man abuses his great qualifications if he does not follow the Vedic way of life. This means he must seriously make a study of the Vedic literatures, especially of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and the Bhagavad-gītā. For learning Vedic knowledge, one must approach a person who is cent-percent engaged in devotional service. He must not do things which are forbidden in the śāstras. A person cannot be a teacher if he drinks or smokes. In the modern system of education the teacher’s academic qualification is taken into consideration without evaluation of his moral life. Therefore, the result of education is misuse of high intelligence in so many ways.

The kṣatriya, the member of the administrative class, is especially advised to give charity and not to accept charity in any circumstances. Modern administrators raise subscriptions for some political functions, but never give charity to the citizens in any state function. It is just the reverse in the injunctions of the śāstras. The administrative class must be well versed in the śāstras, but must not take to the profession of teachers. The administrators should never pretend to become nonviolent and thereby go to hell. When Arjuna wanted to become a nonviolent coward on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, he was severely chastised by Lord Kṛṣṇa. The Lord degraded Arjuna at that time to the status of an uncivilized man for his avowed acceptance of the cult of nonviolence. The administrative class must be personally trained in military education. Cowards should not be elevated to the presidential throne by dint of numerical votes only. The monarchs were all chivalrous personalities, and therefore monarchy should be maintained provided the monarch is regularly trained in the occupational duties of a king. In fighting, the king or the president should never return home without being hurt by the enemy. The so-called king of today never visits the warfield. He is very much expert in artificially encouraging the fighting strength in the hope of false national prestige. As soon as the administrative class is turned into a gang of mercantile and laborer men, the whole machinery of government becomes polluted.

The vaiśyas, the members of the mercantile communities, are especially advised to protect the cows. Cow protection means increasing the milk productions, namely curd and butter. Agriculture and distribution of the foodstuff are the primary duties of the mercantile community backed by education in Vedic knowledge and trained to give in charity. As the kṣatriyas were given charge of the protection of the citizens, vaiśyas were given the charge of the protection of animals. Animals are never meant to be killed. Killing of animals is a symptom of barbarian society. For a human being, agricultural produce, fruits and milk are sufficient and compatible foodstuffs. The human society should give more attention to animal protection. The productive energy of the laborer is misused when he is occupied by industrial enterprises. Industry of various types cannot produce the essential needs of man, namely rice, wheat, grains, milk, fruits and vegetables. The production of machines and machine tools increases the artificial living fashion of a class of vested interests and keeps thousands of men in starvation and unrest. This should not be the standard of civilization.

The śūdra class is less intelligent and should have no independence. They are meant for rendering sincere service to the three higher sections of the society. The śūdra class can attain all comforts of life simply by rendering service to the higher classes. It is especially enjoined that a śūdra should never bank money. As soon as the śūdras accumulate wealth, it will be misused for sinful activities in wine, women and gambling. Wine, women and gambling indicate that the population is degraded to less than śūdra quality. The higher castes should always look after the maintenance of the śūdras, and they should provide them with old and used garments. A śūdra should not leave his master when the master is old and invalid, and the master should keep the servants satisfied in all respects. The śūdras must first of all be satisfied by sumptuous food and clothing before any sacrifice is performed. In this age so many functions are held by spending millions, but the poor laborer is not sumptuously fed or given charity, clothing, etc. The laborers are thus dissatisfied, and so they make agitation.

The varṇas are, so to speak, classifications of different occupations, and āśrama-dharma is gradual progress on the path of self-realization. Both are interrelated, and one is dependent on the other. The main purpose of āśrama-dharma is to awaken knowledge and detachment. The brahmacārī-āśrama is the training ground for the prospective candidates. In this āśrama it is instructed that this material world is not actually the home of the living being. The conditioned souls under material bondage are prisoners of matter, and therefore self-realization is the ultimate aim of life. The whole system of āśrama-dharma is a means to detachment. One who fails to assimilate this spirit of detachment is allowed to enter into family life with the same spirit of detachment. Therefore, one who attains detachment may at once adopt the fourth order, namely renounced, and thus live on charity only, not to accumulate wealth, but just to keep body and soul together for ultimate realization. Household life is for one who is attached, and the vānaprastha and sannyāsa orders of life are for those who are detached from material life. The brahmacārī-āśrama is especially meant for training both the attached and detached.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He described dharmas suitable for men according to their natures, according to varṇa and āśrama, which have qualities of renunciation and enjoyment described according to a person’s detachment or attachment.
Commentary

He described the general dharma for humans according to their natures (puruṣa-sva-bhāva-vihitān). Three verses are joined in one sentence. Yathā-varṇam is an indeclinable, meaning “being qualified by varṇa.” Yathāśramam means “being qualified by āśrama.” The āśramas have qualities of renunciation and enjoyment, which are described respectively according to qualification of detachment or attachment. It is a rule that all the āśramas, such as brahmacarī, need not be undertaken one after the other by all brāhmaṇas. If they have constant renunciation they become sannyāsis and if they have constant attachment, they become gṛhasthas.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.27

↗
దానధర్మాన్ రాజధర్మాన్ మోక్షధర్మాన్ విభాగశ: । స్త్రీధర్మాన్ భగవద్ధర్మాన్ సమాసవ్యాసయోగత: ॥ ౨౭ ॥
dāna-dharmān rāja-dharmān
[daana-dharmaan raaja-dharmaan]
mokṣa-dharmān vibhāgaśaḥ
[moksha-dharmaan vibhaagashah]
strī-dharmān bhagavad-dharmān
[stree-dharmaan bhagavad-dharmaan]
samāsa-vyāsa-yogataḥ
[samaasa-vyaasa-yogatah]
dāna-dharmān — the acts of charity rāja-dharmān — pragmatic activities of the kings mokṣa-dharmān — the acts for salvation vibhāgaśaḥ — by divisions strī-dharmān — duties of women bhagavat-dharmān — the acts of the devotees samāsa — generally vyāsa — explicitly yogataḥ — by means of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dāna-dharmān rāja-dharmān
dāna-dharmān
the acts of charity
rāja-dharmān
pragmatic activities of the kings
mokṣa-dharmān vibhāgaśaḥ
mokṣa-dharmān
the acts for salvation
vibhāgaśaḥ
by divisions
strī-dharmān bhagavad-dharmān
strī-dharmān
duties of women
bhagavat-dharmān
the acts of the devotees
samāsa-vyāsa-yogataḥ
samāsa
generally
vyāsa
explicitly
yogataḥ
by means of.
He then explained, by divisions, acts of charity, the pragmatic activities of a king and activities for salvation. Then he described the duties of women and devotees, both briefly and extensively.

To give charity is one of the householder’s main functions, and he should be prepared to give in charity at least fifty percent of his hard-earned money. A brahmacārī, or student, should perform sacrifices, a householder should give charity, and a person in the retired life or in the renounced order should practice penances and austerities. Those are the general functions of all the āśramas, or orders of life on the path of self-realization. In the brahmacārī life the training is sufficiently imparted so that one may understand that the world as property belongs to the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead. No one, therefore, can claim to be the proprietor of anything in the world. Therefore, in the life of a householder, which is a sort of license for sex enjoyment, one must give in charity for the service of the Lord. Everyone’s energy is generated or borrowed from the reservoir of energy of the Lord; therefore, the resultant actions of such energy must be given to the Lord in the shape of transcendental loving service for Him. As the rivers draw water from the sea through the clouds and again go down to the sea, similarly our energy is borrowed from the supreme source, the Lord’s energy, and it must return to the Lord. That is the perfection of our energy. The Lord, therefore, in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.27) says that whatever we do, whatever we undergo as penance, whatever we sacrifice, whatever we eat or whatever we give in charity must be offered to Him (the Lord). That is the way of utilizing our borrowed energy. When our energy is utilized in that way, our energy is purified from the contamination of material inebrieties, and thus we become fit for our original natural life of service to the Lord.

Rāja-dharma is a great science, unlike modern diplomacy for political supremacy. The kings were trained systematically to become munificent and not merely be tax collectors. They were trained to perform different sacrifices only for the prosperity of the subjects. To lead the prajās to the attainment of salvation was a great duty of the king. The father, the spiritual master and the king are not to become irresponsible in the matter of leading their subjects to the path of ultimate liberation from birth, death, diseases and old age. When these primary duties are properly discharged, there is no need of government of the people, by the people. In modern days the people in general occupy the administration by the strength of manipulated votes, but they are never trained in the primary duties of the king, and that is also not possible for everyone. Under the circumstances the untrained administrators play havoc to make the subjects happy in all respects. On the other hand, these untrained administrators gradually become rogues and thieves and increase the taxation to finance a top-heavy administration that is useless for all purposes. Actually the qualified brāhmaṇas are meant to give direction to the kings for proper administration in terms of the scriptures like the Manu-saṁhitā and Dharma-śāstras of Parāśara. A typical king is the ideal of the people in general, and if the king is pious, religious, chivalrous and munificent, the citizens generally follow him. Such a king is not a lazy sensuous person living at the cost of the subjects, but alert always to kill thieves and dacoits. The pious kings were not merciful to dacoits and thieves in the name of nonsensical ahiṁsā (nonviolence). The thieves and dacoits were punished in an exemplary way so that in the future no one would dare commit such nuisances in an organized form. Such thieves and dacoits were never meant for administration as they are now.

The taxation law was simple. There was no force, no encroachment. The king had a right to take one fourth of the production made by the subject. The king had a right to claim a fourth of one’s allotted wealth. One would never grudge parting with it because due to the pious king and religious harmony there was enough natural wealth, namely grains, fruits, flowers, silk, cotton, milk, jewels, minerals, etc., and therefore no one was materially unhappy. The citizens were rich in agriculture and animal husbandry, and therefore they had enough grains, fruits and milk without any artificial needs of soaps and toilets, cinemas and bars.

The king had to see that the reserved energy of humanity was properly utilized. Human energy is meant not exactly for fulfilling animal propensities, but for self-realization. The whole government was specifically designed to fulfill this particular purpose. As such, the king had to select properly the cabinet ministers, but not on the strength of voting background. The ministers, the military commanders and even the ordinary soldiers were all selected by personal qualification, and the king had to supervise them properly before they were appointed to their respective posts. The king was especially vigilant to see that the tapasvīs, or persons who sacrificed everything for disseminating spiritual knowledge, were never disregarded. The king knew well that the Supreme Personality of Godhead never tolerates any insult to His unalloyed devotees. Such tapasvīs were trusted leaders even of the rogues and thieves, who would never disobey the orders of tapasvīs. The king would give special protection to illiterates, the helpless and widows of the state. Defense measures were arranged previous to any attack by the enemies. The taxing process was easy, and it was not meant for squandering, but was for strengthening the reserve fund. The soldiers were recruited from all parts of the world, and they were trained for special duties.

As far as salvation is concerned, one has to conquer the principles of lust, anger, unlawful desires, avarice and bewilderment. To get freedom from anger, one should learn how to forgive. To be free from unlawful desires one should not make plans. By spiritual culture one is able to conquer sleep. By tolerance only can one conquer desires and avarice. Disturbances from various diseases can be avoided by regulated diets. By self-control one can be free from false hopes, and money can be saved by avoiding undesirable association. By practice of yoga one can control hunger, and worldliness can be avoided by culturing the knowledge of impermanence. Dizziness can be conquered by rising up, and false arguments can be conquered by factual ascertainment. Talkativeness can be avoided by gravity and silence, and by prowess one can avoid fearfulness. Perfect knowledge can be obtained by self-cultivation. One must be free from lust, avarice, anger, dreaming, etc., to actually attain the path of salvation.

As far as the women class are concerned, they are accepted as a power of inspiration for men. As such, women are more powerful than men. Mighty Julius Caesar was controlled by a Cleopatra. Such powerful women are controlled by shyness. Therefore, shyness is important for women. Once this control valve is loosened, women can create havoc in society by adultery. Adultery means production of unwanted children known as varṇa-saṅkara, who disturb the world.

The last item taught by Bhīṣmadeva was the process of pleasing the Lord. We are all eternal servants of the Lord, and when we forget this essential part of our nature we are put into material conditions of life. The simple process of pleasing the Lord (for the householders especially) is to install the Deity of the Lord at home. By concentrating on the Deity, one may progressively go on with the daily routine work. Worshiping the Deity at home, serving the devotee, hearing the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, residing in a holy place and chanting the holy name of the Lord are all inexpensive items by which one can please the Lord. Thus the subject matter was explained by the grandfather to his grandchildren.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Within varṇāśṛama, he described duties of charity, duties of the king, duties for attaining liberation, duties of women and bhakti-yoga, in brief and in detail.
Commentary

And within varṇāśrama, more particularly he described dāna or charity, king’s duties and duties for attaining liberation, women’s duties and finally duties to the Lord (bhagavad-dharmān). This refers to the aṅgas of bhakti. It is placed at the end to indicate that it is the best. He described them in brief and in detail (samāsa-vyāsa-yogataḥ).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.28

↗
ధర్మార్థకామమోక్షాంశ్చ సహోపాయాన్ యథా మునే । నానాఖ్యానేతిహాసేషు వర్ణయామాస తత్త్వవిత్ ॥ ౨౮ ॥
dharmārtha-kāma-mokṣāṁś ca
[dharmaartha-kaama-mokshaamsh cha]
sahopāyān yathā mune
[sahopaayaan yathaa mune]
nānākhyānetihāseṣu
[naanaakhyaanetihaaseshu]
varṇayām āsa tattvavit
[varnayaam aasa tattvavit]
dharma — occupational duties artha — economic development kāma — fulfillment of desires mokṣān — ultimate salvation ca — and saha — along with upāyān — means yathā — as it is mune — O sage nānā — various ākhyāna — by recitation of historical narrations itihāseṣu — in the histories varṇayām āsa — described tattva-vit — one who knows the truth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharmārtha-kāma-mokṣāṁś ca
dharma
occupational duties
artha
economic development
kāma
fulfillment of desires
mokṣān
ultimate salvation
ca
and
sahopāyān yathā mune
saha
along with
upāyān
means
yathā
as it is
mune
O sage
nānākhyānetihāseṣu
nānā
various
ākhyāna
by recitation of historical narrations
varṇayām āsa tattvavit
itihāseṣu
in the histories
varṇayām āsa
described
tattva-vit
one who knows the truth.
Then he described the occupational duties of different orders and statuses of life, citing instances from history, for he was himself well acquainted with the truth.

Incidents mentioned in the Vedic literatures such as the Purāṇas, Mahābhārata and Rāmāyaṇa are factual historical narrations that took place sometime in the past, although not in any chronological order. Such historical facts, being instructive for ordinary men, were assorted without chronological reference. Besides that, they happen on different planets, nay, in different universes, and thus the description of the narrations is sometimes measured by three dimensions. We are simply concerned with the instructive lessons of such incidents, even though they are not in order by our limited range of understanding. Bhīṣmadeva described such narrations before Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira in reply to his different questions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! Bhīṣma, knower of truth, accurately described dharma, artha, kāma and mokṣa along with their methods, using various stories and histories as proof.
Commentary

All the dharmas described can be placed ultimately in four categories of artha, dharma, kāma and mokṣa. He mentions these categories in order to strengthen what has been said. Upāyān means the means of attaining dharma, artha, kāma and mokṣa. Yathā means “accurately.” He proved what he said by showing instances in the histories.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.29

↗
ధర్మం ప్రవదతస్తస్య స కాల: ప్రత్యుపస్థిత: । యో యోగినశ్ఛన్దమృత్యోర్వాఞ్ఛితస్తూత్తరాయణ: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
dharmaṁ pravadatas tasya
[dharmam pravadatas tasya]
sa kālaḥ pratyupasthitaḥ
[sa kaalah pratyupasthitah]
yo yoginaś chanda-mṛtyor
[yo yoginash chanda-mrityor]
vāṣchitas tūttarāyaṇaḥ
[vaashchitas toottaraayanah]
dharmam — occupational duties pravadataḥ — while describing tasya — his saḥ — that kālaḥ — time pratyupasthitaḥ — exactly appeared yaḥ — that is yoginaḥ — for the mystics chanda-mṛtyoḥ — of one who dies according to one’s own selection of time vāṣchitaḥ — is desired by tu — but uttarāyaṇaḥ — the period when the sun runs on the northern horizon.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharmaṁ pravadatas tasya
dharmam
occupational duties
pravadataḥ
while describing
tasya
his
sa kālaḥ pratyupasthitaḥ
saḥ
that
kālaḥ
time
pratyupasthitaḥ
exactly appeared
yo yoginaś chanda-mṛtyor
vāṣchitas tūttarāyaṇaḥ
yaḥ
that is
yoginaḥ
for the mystics
chanda-mṛtyoḥ
of one who dies according to one’s own selection of time
vāṣchitaḥ
is desired by
tu
but
uttarāyaṇaḥ
the period when the sun runs on the northern horizon.
While Bhīṣmadeva was describing occupational duties, the sun’s course ran into the northern hemisphere. This period is desired by mystics who die at their will.

The perfect yogīs or mystics can leave the material body at their own sweet will at a suitable time and go to a suitable planet desired by them. In the Bhagavad-gītā (8.24) it is said that self-realized souls who have exactly identified themselves with the interest of the Supreme Lord can generally leave the material body during the time of the fire-god’s effulgence and when the sun is in the northern horizon, and thus achieve the transcendental sky. In the Vedas these times are considered auspicious for quitting the body, and they are taken advantage of by the expert mystics who have perfected the system. Perfection of yoga means attainment of such supermental states as to be able to leave the material body as desired. Yogīs can also reach any planet within no time without a material vehicle. The yogīs can reach the highest planetary system within a very short time, and this is impossible for the materialist. Even attempting to reach the highest planet will take millions of years at a speed of millions of miles per hour. This is a different science, and Bhīṣmadeva knew well how to utilize it. He was just waiting for the suitable moment to quit his material body, and the golden opportunity arrived when he was instructing his noble grandsons, the Pāṇḍavas. He thus prepared himself to quit his body before the exalted Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the pious Pāṇḍavas and the great sages headed by Bhagavān Vyāsa, etc., all great souls.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The time of uttarāyaṇa, which was desired by Bhīṣma, who had finished speaking on dharma and could die when he chose, then arrived.
Commentary

Chanda-mṛtyoḥ means “of he who could die when he pleased.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.30

↗
తదోపసంహృత్య గిర: సహస్రణీ- ర్విముక్తసఙ్గం మన ఆదిపూరుషే । కృష్ణే లసత్పీతపటే చతుర్భుజే పుర:స్థితేఽమీలితద‍ృగ్వ్యధారయత్ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
tadopasaṁhṛtya giraḥ sahasraṇīr
[tadopasamhritya girah sahasraneer]
vimukta-saṅgaṁ mana ādi-pūruṣe
[vimukta-sangam mana aadi-poorushe]
kṛṣṇe lasat-pīta-paṭe catur-bhuje
[krishne lasat-peeta-pate chatur-bhuje]
puraḥ sthite ’mīlita-dṛg vyadhārayat
[purah sthite ’meelita-drig vyadhaarayat]
tadā — at that time upasaṁhṛtya — withdrawing giraḥ — speech sahasraṇīḥ — Bhīṣmadeva (who was expert in thousands of sciences and arts) vimukta-saṅgam — completely freed from everything else manaḥ — mind ādi-pūruṣe — unto the original Personality of Godhead kṛṣṇe — unto Kṛṣṇa lasat-pīta-paṭe — decorated with yellow garments catur-bhuje — unto the four-handed original Nārāyaṇa puraḥ — just before sthite — standing amīlita — widespread dṛk — vision vyadhārayat — fixed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadopasaṁhṛtya giraḥ sahasraṇīr
tadā
at that time
upasaṁhṛtya
withdrawing
giraḥ
speech
sahasraṇīḥ
Bhīṣmadeva (who was expert in thousands of sciences and arts)
vimukta-saṅgaṁ mana ādi-pūruṣe
vimukta-saṅgam
completely freed from everything else
manaḥ
mind
ādi-pūruṣe
unto the original Personality of Godhead
kṛṣṇe lasat-pīta-paṭe catur-bhuje
kṛṣṇe
unto Kṛṣṇa
lasat-pīta-paṭe
decorated with yellow garments
catur-bhuje
unto the four-handed original Nārāyaṇa
puraḥ sthite ’mīlita-dṛg vyadhārayat
puraḥ
just before
sthite
standing
amīlita
widespread
dṛk
vision
vyadhārayat
fixed.
Thereupon that man who spoke on different subjects with thousands of meanings, and who fought on thousands of battlefields and protected thousands of men, stopped speaking and, being completely freed from all bondage, withdrew his mind from everything else and fixed his wide-open eyes upon the original Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who stood before him, four-handed, dressed in yellow garments that glittered and shined.

In the momentous hour of leaving his material body, Bhīṣmadeva set the glorious example concerning the important function of the human form of life. The subject matter which attracts the dying man becomes the beginning of his next life. Therefore, if one is absorbed in thoughts of the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, he is sure to go back to Godhead without any doubt. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.5-15):

5: And whoever, at the time of death, quits his body remembering Me alone at once attains My nature. Of this there is no doubt.

6: Whatever state of being one remembers when he quits his body, that state he will attain without fail.

7: Therefore, Arjuna, you should always think of Me in the form of Kṛṣṇa and at the same time carry out your prescribed duty of fighting. With your activities dedicated to Me and your mind and intelligence fixed on Me, you will attain Me without doubt.

8: He who meditates on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, his mind constantly engaged in remembering Me, undeviated from the path, he, O Pārtha [Arjuna], is sure to reach Me.

9: One should meditate upon the Supreme Person as the one who knows everything, as He who is the oldest, who is the controller, who is smaller than the smallest, who is the maintainer of everything, who is beyond all material conception, who is inconceivable, and who is always a person. He is luminous like the sun and, being transcendental, is beyond this material nature.

10: One who, at the time of death, fixes his life air between the eyebrows and in full devotion engages himself in remembering the Supreme Lord will certainly attain to the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

11: Persons learned in the Vedas, who utter oṁkāra and who are great sages in the renounced order, enter into Brahman. Desiring such perfection, one practices celibacy. I shall now explain to you this process by which one may attain salvation.

12: The yogic situation is that of detachment from all sensual engagements. Closing all the doors of the senses and fixing the mind on the heart and the life air at the top of the head, one establishes himself in yoga.

13: After being situated in this yoga practice and vibrating the sacred syllable oṁ, the supreme combination of letters, if one thinks of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and quits his body, he will certainly reach the spiritual planets.

14: For one who remembers Me without deviation, I am easy to obtain, O son of Pṛthā, because of his constant engagement in devotional service.

15: After attaining Me, the great souls, who are yogīs in devotion, never return to this temporary world, which is full of miseries, because they have attained the highest perfection.

Śrī Bhīṣmadeva attained the perfection of quitting his body at will and was fortunate enough to have Lord Kṛṣṇa, the object of his attention, personally present at the time of death. He therefore fixed his open eyes upon Him. He wanted to see Śrī Kṛṣṇa for a long time out of his spontaneous love for Him. Because he was a pure devotee, he had very little to do with the detailed performance of yogic principles. Simple bhakti-yoga is enough to bring about perfection. Therefore, the ardent desire of Bhīṣmadeva was to see the person of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the most lovable object, and by the grace of the Lord, Śrī Bhīṣmadeva had this opportunity at the last stage of his breathing.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
At that time, withdrawing his words from other subjects, with eyes wide open, Bhīṣma, leader of a thousand chariots, concentrated himself, free of all material attachment, upon Kṛṣṇa, the original person, dressed in shining yellow garments, with four arms, standing before him.
Commentary

Sahasraṇīḥ refers to Bhīṣma, who led (nī) or protected a thousand charioteers gathered for battle. Another version has sahasriṇīḥ which means “possessing a thousand treasures.” Withdrawing his words from other subjects (giraḥ upasaṁhṛtya), with eyes completely open without blinking, he completely absorbed his mind in Kṛṣṇa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.31

↗
విశుద్ధయా ధారణయా హతాశుభ- స్తదీక్షయైవాశు గతాయుధశ్రమ: । నివృత్తసర్వేన్ద్రియవృత్తివిభ్రమ- స్తుష్టావ జన్యం విసృజఞ్జనార్దనమ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
viśuddhayā dhāraṇayā hatāśubhas
[vishuddhayaa dhaaranayaa hataashubhas]
tad-īkṣayaivāśu gatā-yudha-śramaḥ
[tad-eekshayaivaashu gataa-yudha-shramah]
nivṛtta-sarvendriya-vṛtti-vibhramas
[nivritta-sarvendriya-vritti-vibhramas]
tuṣṭāva janyaṁ visṛjaṣ janārdanam
[tushtaava janyam visrijash janaardanam]
viśuddhayā — by purified dhāraṇayā — meditation hata-aśubhaḥ — one who has minimized the inauspicious qualities of material existence tat — Him īkṣayā — by looking on eva — simply āśu — immediately gatā — having gone away yudha — from the arrows śramaḥ — fatigue nivṛtta — being stopped sarva — all indriya — senses vṛtti — activities vibhramaḥ — being widely engaged tuṣṭāva — he prayed janyam — the material tabernacle visṛjan — while quitting janārdanam — to the controller of the living beings.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viśuddhayā dhāraṇayā hatāśubhas
viśuddhayā
by purified
dhāraṇayā
meditation
hata-aśubhaḥ
one who has minimized the inauspicious qualities of material existence
tad-īkṣayaivāśu gatā-yudha-śramaḥ
tat
Him
īkṣayā
by looking on
eva
simply
āśu
immediately
gatā
having gone away
yudha
from the arrows
śramaḥ
fatigue
nivṛtta-sarvendriya-vṛtti-vibhramas
nivṛtta
being stopped
sarva
all
indriya
senses
vṛtti
activities
vibhramaḥ
being widely engaged
tuṣṭāva janyaṁ visṛjaṣ janārdanam
tuṣṭāva
he prayed
janyam
the material tabernacle
visṛjan
while quitting
janārdanam
to the controller of the living beings.
By pure meditation, looking at Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, he at once was freed from all material inauspiciousness and was relieved of all bodily pains caused by the arrow wounds. Thus all the external activities of his senses at once stopped, and he prayed transcendentally to the controller of all living beings while quitting his material body.

The material body is a gift of the material energy, technically called illusion. Identification with the material body is due to forgetfulness of our eternal relationship with the Lord. For a pure devotee of the Lord like Bhīṣmadeva, this illusion was at once removed as soon as the Lord arrived. Lord Kṛṣṇa is like the sun, and the illusory, external material energy is like darkness. In the presence of the sun there is no possibility that darkness can stand. Therefore, just on the arrival of Lord Kṛṣṇa, all material contamination was completely removed, and Bhīṣmadeva was thus able to be transcendentally situated by stopping the activities of the impure senses in collaboration with matter. The soul is originally pure and so also the senses. By material contamination the senses assume the role of imperfection and impurity. By revival of contact with the Supreme Pure, Lord Kṛṣṇa, the senses again become freed from material contaminations. Bhīṣmadeva attained all these transcendental conditions prior to his leaving the material body because of the Lord’s presence. The Lord is the controller and benefactor of all living beings. That is the verdict of all Vedas. He is the supreme eternity and living entity amongst all the eternal living beings.* And He alone provides all the necessities for all kinds of living beings. Thus He provided all facilities to fulfill the transcendental desires of His great devotee Bhīṣmadeva, who prayed as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As Bhīṣma, free of all inauspiciousness by his pure concentration, free of physical fatigue from fighting and free of wandering senses by Kṛṣṇa’s glance of mercy, left his body, he began to praise Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

Tad-īkṣayā means by the glance of mercy of Kṛṣṇa. Vibhramaḥ means the various wandeings (vividha-bhramaṇa) of the senses. Janyam means the material body, or the material world.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.32

↗
శ్రీభీష్మ ఉవాచ ఇతి మతిరుపకల్పితా వితృష్ణా భగవతి సాత్వతపుఙ్గవే విభూమ్ని । స్వసుఖముపగతే క్‍వచిద్విహర్తుం ప్రకృతిముపేయుషి యద్భ‍వప్రవాహ: ॥ ౩౨ ॥
śrī-bhīṣma uvāca
[shree-bheeshma uvaacha]
iti matir upakalpitā vitṛṣṇā
[iti matir upakalpitaa vitrishnaa]
bhagavati sātvata-puṅgave vibhūmni
[bhagavati saatvata-pungave vibhoomni]
sva-sukham upagate kvacid vihartuṁ
[sva-sukham upagate kvachid vihartum]
prakṛtim upeyuṣi yad-bhava-pravāhaḥ
[prakritim upeyushi yad-bhava-pravaahah]
śrī-bhīṣmaḥ uvāca — Śrī Bhīṣmadeva said iti — thus matiḥ — thinking, feeling and willing upakalpitā — invested vitṛṣṇā — freed from all sense desires bhagavati — unto the Personality of Godhead sātvata-puṅgave — unto the leader of the devotees vibhūmni — unto the great sva-sukham — self-satisfaction upagate — unto He who has attained it kvacit — sometimes vihartum — out of transcendental pleasure prakṛtim — in the material world upeyuṣi — do accept it yat-bhava — from whom the creation pravāhaḥ — is made and annihilated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhīṣma uvāca
śrī-bhīṣmaḥ uvāca
Śrī Bhīṣmadeva said
iti matir upakalpitā vitṛṣṇā
iti
thus
matiḥ
thinking, feeling and willing
upakalpitā
invested
vitṛṣṇā
freed from all sense desires
bhagavati sātvata-puṅgave vibhūmni
bhagavati
unto the Personality of Godhead
sātvata-puṅgave
unto the leader of the devotees
vibhūmni
unto the great
sva-sukham upagate kvacid vihartuṁ
sva-sukham
self-satisfaction
upagate
unto He who has attained it
kvacit
sometimes
vihartum
out of transcendental pleasure
prakṛtim upeyuṣi yad-bhava-pravāhaḥ
prakṛtim
in the material world
upeyuṣi
do accept it
yat-bhava
from whom the creation
pravāhaḥ
is made and annihilated.
Bhīṣmadeva said: Let me now invest my thinking, feeling and willing, which were so long engaged in different subjects and occupational duties, in the all-powerful Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. He is always self-satisfied, but sometimes, being the leader of the devotees, He enjoys transcendental pleasure by descending to the material world, although from Him only the material world is created.

Because Bhīṣmadeva was a statesman, the head of the Kuru dynasty, a great general and a leader of kṣatriyas, his mind was strewn over so many subjects, and his thinking, feeling and willing were engaged in different matters. Now, in order to achieve pure devotional service, he wanted to invest all powers of thinking, feeling and willing entirely in the Supreme Being, Lord Kṛṣṇa. He is described herein as the leader of the devotees and all-powerful. Although Lord Kṛṣṇa is the original Personality of Godhead, He Himself descends to earth to bestow upon His pure devotees the boon of devotional service. He descends sometimes as Lord Kṛṣṇa as He is, and sometimes as Lord Caitanya. Both are leaders of the pure devotees. Pure devotees of the Lord have no desire other than the service of the Lord, and therefore they are called sātvata. The Lord is the chief amongst such sātvatas. Bhīṣmadeva, therefore, had no other desires. Unless one is purified from all sorts of material desires, the Lord does not become one’s leader. Desires cannot be wiped out, but they have only to be purified. It is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (10.10) by the Lord Himself that He gives His instruction from within the heart of a pure devotee who is constantly engaged in the service of the Lord. Such instruction is given not for any material purpose but only for going back home, back to Godhead. For the ordinary man who wants to lord it over material nature, the Lord only sanctions and becomes a witness of activities, but He never gives the nondevotee instructions for going back to Godhead. That is the difference in dealings by the Lord with different living beings, both the devotee and the nondevotee. He is leader of all the living beings, as the king of the state rules both the prisoners and the free citizens. But His dealings are different in terms of devotee and nondevotee. Nondevotees never care to take any instruction from the Lord, and therefore the Lord is silent in their case, although He witnesses all their activities and awards them the necessary results, good or bad. The devotees are above this material goodness and badness. They are progressive on the path of transcendence, and therefore they have no desire for anything material. The devotee also knows Śrī Kṛṣṇa as the original Nārāyaṇa because Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, by His plenary portion, appears as the Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, the original source of all material creation. The Lord also desires the association of His pure devotees, and for them only the Lord descends to the earth and enlivens them. The Lord appears out of His own will. He is not forced by the conditions of material nature. He is therefore described here as the vibhu, or the almighty, for He is never conditioned by the laws of material nature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Bhīṣma said: At the end of my life I offer my thoughts to you, bhagavān full of six qualities, best of the Yadus, superior to all other forms of the Lord, absorbed in bliss with your associates, and who, as a pastime, in the form of the puruṣāvatara, sometimes accepts māyā by your glance, which produces the material world.
Commentary

At the end of my life (iti), my thoughts are offered to the Lord. Since my master has come to me at the time of my passing away under the influence of his mercy, I must give him a gift. There is nothing suitable in this abode of possessiveness and ego. Therefore I make a gift of my thoughts alone.

“But in this world we see people who give also desire to take.”

“My thoughts are without desire (vitṛṣṇā). I offer them to bhagavān, who is full of six wondrous qualities.”

“But the Lord is famous as Nārāyaṇa.”

“No, he is famous as the best of the Yadu dynasty.”

“But Nārāyaṇa is greatly famous as bhagavān for all time.”

“There is no greatness superior to his (vibhūmni). He is the source of Nārāyaṇa.”

He attained (gate) profusely (upa) the highest bliss (sukham) with his own Yādavas and Pāṇḍavas (sva). The main qualities of the Lord have thus been described.

Next the secondary qualities are described. You contact māyā by glancing for evolving mahattattva from which arises the sequence of material creation. You do this in your forms of the puruṣāvatāras.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.33

↗
త్రిభువనకమనం తమాలవర్ణం రవికరగౌరవరామ్బరం దధానే । వపురలకకులావృతాననాబ్జం విజయసఖే రతిరస్తు మేఽనవద్యా ॥ ౩౩ ॥
tri-bhuvana-kamanaṁ tamāla-varṇaṁ
[tri-bhuvana-kamanam tamaala-varnam]
ravi-kara-gaura-vara-ambaraṁ dadhāne
[ravi-kara-gaura-vara-ambaram dadhaane]
vapur alaka-kulāvṛtānanābjaṁ
[vapur alaka-kulaavritaananaabjam]
vijaya-sakhe ratir astu me ’navadyā
[vijaya-sakhe ratir astu me ’navadyaa]
tri-bhuvana — three statuses of planetary systems kamanam — the most desirable tamāla-varṇam — bluish like the tamāla tree ravi-kara — sun rays gaura — golden color varāmbaram — glittering dress dadhāne — one who wears vapuḥ — body alaka-kula-āvṛta — covered with paintings of sandalwood pulp anana-abjam — face like a lotus vijaya-sakhe — unto the friend of Arjuna ratiḥ astu — may attraction be reposed upon Him me — my anavadyā — without desire for fruitive results.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tri-bhuvana-kamanaṁ tamāla-varṇaṁ
tri-bhuvana
three statuses of planetary systems
kamanam
the most desirable
tamāla-varṇam
bluish like the tamāla tree
ravi-kara-gaura-vara-ambaraṁ dadhāne
ravi-kara
sun rays
gaura
golden color
varāmbaram
glittering dress
dadhāne
one who wears
vapur alaka-kulāvṛtānanābjaṁ
vapuḥ
body
alaka-kula-āvṛta
covered with paintings of sandalwood pulp
anana-abjam
face like a lotus
vijaya-sakhe ratir astu me ’navadyā
vijaya-sakhe
unto the friend of Arjuna
ratiḥ astu
may attraction be reposed upon Him
me
my
anavadyā
without desire for fruitive results.
Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the intimate friend of Arjuna. He has appeared on this earth in His transcendental body, which resembles the bluish color of the tamāla tree. His body attracts everyone in the three planetary systems [upper, middle and lower]. May His glittering yellow dress and His lotus face, covered with paintings of sandalwood pulp, be the object of my attraction, and may I not desire fruitive results.

When Śrī Kṛṣṇa by His own internal pleasure appears on earth, He does so by the agency of His internal potency. The attractive features of His transcendental body are desired in all the three worlds, namely the upper, middle and lower planetary systems. Nowhere in the universe are there such beautiful bodily features as those of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Therefore His transcendental body has nothing to do with anything materially created. Arjuna is described here as the conqueror, and Kṛṣṇa is described as his intimate friend. Bhīṣmadeva, on his bed of arrows after the Battle of Kurukṣetra, is remembering the particular dress of Lord Kṛṣṇa which He put on as the driver of Arjuna’s chariot. While fighting was going on between Arjuna and Bhīṣma, Bhīṣma’s attraction was drawn by the glittering dress of Kṛṣṇa, and indirectly he admired his so-called enemy Arjuna for possessing the Lord as his friend. Arjuna was always a conqueror because the Lord was his friend. Bhīṣmadeva takes this opportunity to address the Lord as vijaya-sakhe (friend of Arjuna) because the Lord is pleased when He is addressed conjointly with His devotees, who are related with Him in different transcendental humors. While Kṛṣṇa was the charioteer of Arjuna, sun rays glittered on the dress of the Lord, and the beautiful hue created by the reflection of such rays was never forgotten by Bhīṣmadeva. As a great fighter he was relishing the relation of Kṛṣṇa in the chivalrous humor. Transcendental relation with the Lord in any one of the different rasas (humors) is relishable by the respective devotees in the highest ecstasy. Less intelligent mundaners who want to make a show of being transcendentally related with the Lord artificially jump at once to the relation of conjugal love, imitating the damsels of Vrajadhāma. Such a cheap relation with the Lord exhibits only the base mentality of the mundaner because one who has relished conjugal humor with the Lord cannot be attached to worldly conjugal rasa, which is condemned even by mundane ethics. The eternal relation of a particular soul with the Lord is evolved. A genuine relation of the living being with the Supreme Lord can take any form out of the five principal rasas, and it does not make any difference in transcendental degree to the genuine devotee. Bhīṣmadeva is a concrete example of this, and it should be carefully observed how the great general is transcendentally related with the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Let me have pure prema for Kṛṣṇa, the friend of Arjuna, who possesses a body desired by all the inhabitants of the three worlds, which is clothed with intense yellow garments shining in the sun, whose complexion is dark like the tamāla tree, and whose lotus face is surrounded by locks of hair.
Commentary

“What is the nature of your thoughts?”

Let me have pure prema (ratiḥ) without desire for results, for the friend of Arjuna (vijaya-sakhe), who accepts a body which is desired by all persons in the upper, middle and lower planets, which is clothed in garments golden in the sun’s rays. I saw that intense yellow from his upper and lower cloth sparkling in the sun’s rays as he stood on the chariot of Arjuna. My thoughts take the form of a prayer to have this prema for the most beautiful Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer of Arjuna. In the prayers of following verses also there is no use of the second person, though Kṛṣṇa was present before him This indicates his attraction for the sweetness of the Lord absorbed in vīra-rasa during the battle, and his absorption in relishing it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.34

↗
యుధి తురగరజోవిధూమ్రవిష్వక్- కచలులితశ్రమవార్యలఙ్‍కృతాస్యే । మమ నిశితశరైర్విభిద్యమాన- త్వచి విలసత్కవచేఽస్తు కృష్ణ ఆత్మా ॥ ౩౪ ॥
yudhi turaga-rajo-vidhūmra-viṣvak-
[yudhi turaga-rajo-vidhoomra-vishvak-]
kaca-lulita-śramavāry-alaṅkṛtāsye
[kacha-lulita-shramavaary-alankritaasye]
mama niśita-śarair vibhidyamāna-
[mama nishita-sharair vibhidyamaana-]
tvaci vilasat-kavace ’stu kṛṣṇa ātmā
[tvachi vilasat-kavache ’stu krishna aatmaa]
yudhi — on the battlefield turaga — horses rajaḥ — dust vidhūmra — turned an ashen color viṣvak — waving kaca — hair lulita — scattered śramavāri — perspiration alaṅkṛta — decorated with āsye — unto the face mama — my niśita — sharp śaraiḥ — by the arrows vibhidyamāna — pierced by tvaci — in the skin vilasat — enjoying pleasure kavace — protecting armor astu — let there be kṛṣṇe — unto Śrī Kṛṣṇa ātmā — mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yudhi turaga-rajo-vidhūmra-viṣvak-
yudhi
on the battlefield
turaga
horses
rajaḥ
dust
vidhūmra
turned an ashen color
viṣvak
waving
kaca-lulita-śramavāry-alaṅkṛtāsye
kaca
hair
lulita
scattered
śramavāri
perspiration
alaṅkṛta
decorated with
āsye
unto the face
mama niśita-śarair vibhidyamāna-
mama
my
niśita
sharp
śaraiḥ
by the arrows
vibhidyamāna
pierced by
tvaci vilasat-kavace ’stu kṛṣṇa ātmā
tvaci
in the skin
vilasat
enjoying pleasure
kavace
protecting armor
astu
let there be
kṛṣṇe
unto Śrī Kṛṣṇa
ātmā
mind.
On the battlefield [where Śrī Kṛṣṇa attended Arjuna out of friendship], the flowing hair of Lord Kṛṣṇa turned ashen due to the dust raised by the hoofs of the horses. And because of His labor, beads of sweat wetted His face. All these decorations, intensified by the wounds dealt by my sharp arrows, were enjoyed by Him. Let my mind thus go unto Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

The Lord is the absolute form of eternity, bliss and knowledge. As such, transcendental loving service to the Lord in one of the five principal relations, namely śānta, dāsya, sakhya, vātsalya and mādhurya, i.e., neutrality, servitorship, fraternity, parental affection and conjugal love, is graciously accepted by the Lord when offered to the Lord in genuine love and affection. Śrī Bhīṣmadeva is a great devotee of the Lord in the relation of servitorship. Thus his throwing of sharp arrows at the transcendental body of the Lord is as good as the worship of another devotee who throws soft roses upon Him.

It appears that Bhīṣmadeva is repenting the actions he committed against the person of the Lord. But factually the Lord’s body was not at all pained, due to His transcendental existence. His body is not matter. Both He Himself and His body are complete spiritual identity. Spirit is never pierced, burnt, dried, moistened, etc. This is vividly explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. So also it is stated in the Skanda Purāṇa. It is said there that spirit is always uncontaminated and indestructible. It cannot be distressed, nor can it be dried up. When Lord Viṣṇu in His incarnation appears before us, He seems to be like one of the conditioned souls, materially encaged, just to bewilder the asuras, or the nonbelievers, who are always alert to kill the Lord, even from the very beginning of His appearance. Kaṁsa wanted to kill Kṛṣṇa, and Rāvaṇa wanted to kill Rāma, because foolishly they were unaware of the fact that the Lord is never killed, for the spirit is never annihilated.

Therefore Bhīṣmadeva’s piercing of the body of Lord Kṛṣṇa is a sort of bewildering problem for the nondevotee atheist, but those who are devotees, or liberated souls, are not bewildered.

Bhīṣmadeva appreciated the all-merciful attitude of the Lord because He did not leave Arjuna alone, although He was disturbed by the sharpened arrows of Bhīṣmadeva, nor was He reluctant to come before Bhīṣma’s deathbed, even though He was ill-treated by him on the battlefield. Bhīṣma’s repentance and the Lord’s merciful attitude are both unique in this picture.

Śrī Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, a great ācārya and devotee in the humor of conjugal love with the Lord, remarks very saliently in this regard. He says that the wounds created on the body of the Lord by the sharpened arrows of Bhīṣmadeva were as pleasing to the Lord as the biting of a fiancee who bites the Lord’s body directed by a strong sense of sex desire. Such biting by the opposite sex is never taken as a sign of enmity, even if there is a wound on the body. Therefore, the fighting as an exchange of transcendental pleasure between the Lord and His pure devotee, Śrī Bhīṣmadeva, was not at all mundane. Besides that, since the Lord’s body and the Lord are identical, there was no possibility of wounds in the absolute body. The apparent wounds caused by the sharpened arrows are misleading to the common man, but one who has a little absolute knowledge can understand the transcendental exchange in the chivalrous relation. The Lord was perfectly happy with the wounds caused by the sharpened arrows of Bhīṣmadeva. The word vibhidyamāna is significant because the Lord’s skin is not different from the Lord. Because our skin is different from our soul, in our case the word vibhidyamāna, or being bruised and cut, would have been quite suitable. Transcendental bliss is of different varieties, and the variety of activities in the mundane world is but a perverted reflection of transcendental bliss. Because everything in the mundane world is qualitatively mundane, it is full of inebrieties, whereas in the absolute realm, because everything is of the same absolute nature, there are varieties of enjoyment without inebriety. The Lord enjoyed the wounds created by His great devotee Bhīṣmadeva, and because Bhīṣmadeva is a devotee in the chivalrous relation, he fixes up his mind on Kṛṣṇa in that wounded condition.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
May my mind concentrate on Kṛṣṇa, whose face was decorated with hair covered with the dust raised by horses, tossed all about because of the speed of his driving, and with perspiration because of his great effort in protecting Arjuna, whose armor shone brightly, pierced slightly by my sharp arrows.
Commentary

Having spoken of Kṛṣṇa’s face surrounded by locks of hair, Bhīṣma cannot give up that sweetness. Again he describes more details. The face is decorated with hair thrown all about because of the speed of the chariot, and colored with the dust raised by the horses. Even in what is not beautiful, beauty can be found. [Note: sundare kim asundaram nyāya.] The face is decorated with perspiration arising from effort. This indicates Kṛṣṇa’s efforts because of his affection for Arjuna. Kṛṣṇa’s skin was pierced by Bhīṣma’s sharp arrows. Just as the man involved in love derives happiness from the bite marks of a bold lover, Kṛṣṇa, the most courageous warrior, in the mood of fighting, derived pleasure from my strength in the form of the wounds from my arrows. One should not think that I, even overcome by the mood of fighting with Kṛṣṇa, was ever devoid of prema. Similarly the woman who inflicts deep wounds upon her beloved, dearer than a million of her lives, with her nails and teeth during the battle of love, cannot be said to be devoid of love for him. Kṛṣṇa’s skin was not really pierced because he was wearing an armor, which shone brightly. It means that the arrows slightly pierced the armor. Atmā means mind.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.35

↗
సపది సఖివచో నిశమ్య మధ్యే నిజపరయోర్బలయో రథం నివేశ్య । స్థితవతి పరసైనికాయురక్ష్ణా హృతవతి పార్థసఖే రతిర్మమాస్తు ॥ ౩౫ ॥
sapadi sakhi-vaco niśamya madhye
[sapadi sakhi-vacho nishamya madhye]
nija-parayor balayo rathaṁ niveśya
[nija-parayor balayo ratham niveshya]
sthitavati para-sainikāyur akṣṇā
[sthitavati para-sainikaayur akshnaa]
hṛtavati pārtha-sakhe ratir mamāstu
[hritavati paartha-sakhe ratir mamaastu]
sapadi — on the battlefield sakhi-vacaḥ — command of the friend niśamya — after hearing madhye — in the midst nija — His own parayoḥ — and the opposite party balayoḥ — strength ratham — chariot niveśya — having entered sthitavati — while staying there para-sainika — of the soldiers on the opposite side āyuḥ — duration of life akṣṇā — by looking over hṛtavati — act of diminishing pārtha — of Arjuna, son of Pṛthā (Kuntī) sakhe — unto the friend ratiḥ — intimate relation mama — my astu — let there be.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sapadi sakhi-vaco niśamya madhye
sapadi
on the battlefield
sakhi-vacaḥ
command of the friend
niśamya
after hearing
madhye
in the midst
nija-parayor balayo rathaṁ niveśya
nija
His own
parayoḥ
and the opposite party
balayoḥ
strength
ratham
chariot
niveśya
having entered
sthitavati para-sainikāyur akṣṇā
sthitavati
while staying there
para-sainika
of the soldiers on the opposite side
āyuḥ
duration of life
akṣṇā
by looking over
hṛtavati pārtha-sakhe ratir mamāstu
hṛtavati
act of diminishing
pārtha
of Arjuna, son of Pṛthā (Kuntī)
sakhe
unto the friend
ratiḥ
intimate relation
mama
my
astu
let there be.
In obedience to the command of His friend, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa entered the arena of the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra between the soldiers of Arjuna and Duryodhana, and while there He shortened the life spans of the opposite party by His merciful glance. This was done simply by His looking at the enemy. Let my mind be fixed upon that Kṛṣṇa.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (1.21-25) Arjuna ordered the infallible Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa to place his chariot between the phalanxes of the soldiers. He asked Him to stay there until he had finished observing the enemies he had to face in the battle. When the Lord was so asked, He at once did so, just like an order carrier. And the Lord pointed out all the important men on the opposite side, saying, “Here is Bhīṣma, here is Droṇa,” and so on. The Lord, being the supreme living being, is never the order supplier or order carrier of anyone, whoever he may be. But out of His causeless mercy and affection for His pure devotees, sometimes He carries out the order of the devotee like an awaiting servant. By executing the order of a devotee, the Lord becomes pleased, as a father is pleased to carry out the order of his small child. This is possible only out of pure transcendental love between the Lord and His devotees, and Bhīṣmadeva was quite aware of this fact. He therefore addressed the Lord as the friend of Arjuna.

The Lord diminished the duration of life of the opposite party by His merciful glance. It is said that all the fighters who assembled on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra attained salvation by personally seeing the Lord at the time of death. Therefore, His diminishing the duration of life of Arjuna’s enemy does not mean that He was partial to the cause of Arjuna. Factually He was merciful to the opposite party because they would not have attained salvation by dying at home in the ordinary course of life. Here was a chance to see the Lord at the time of death and thus attain salvation from material life. Therefore, the Lord is all good, and whatever He does is for everyone’s good. Apparently it was for the victory of Arjuna, His intimate friend, but factually it was for the good of Arjuna’s enemies. Such are the transcendental activities of the Lord, and whoever understands this also gets salvation after quitting this material body. The Lord does no wrong in any circumstance because He is absolute, all good at all times.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
May I have prema for the chariot driver of Arjuna, who placed the chariot between the two opposing armies immediately on hearing Arjuna’s request, and, situated there, by his glance, took away the prārabdha-karmas of the opposing party.
Commentary

And he immediately followed Arjuna’s order.

senayor ubhayor madhye rathaṁ sthāpaya me ’cyuta | yāvad etān nirīkṣye ’haṁ yoddhukāmān avasthitān ||

O Acyuta please station my chariot between the two armies, so I can view at the commencement of the war those situated with a desire to fight, and can see my companions in battle. BG.1.21

Just by his glance (akṣṇā), showing to Arjuna “This is Bhīṣma, this is Droṇa, this is Karṇa,” he took away their lives. This actually indicates he took away their prārabdha-karma, since it will be said later yam iha nirīkṣya hatā gatāḥ sva-rūpam: those who saw him on the battlefield of Kurukṣetra attained their original forms after death. (SB 1.9.39)

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.36

↗
వ్యవహితపృతనాముఖం నిరీక్ష్య స్వజనవధాద్విముఖస్య దోషబుద్ధ్యా । కుమతిమహరదాత్మవిద్యయా య- శ్చరణరతి: పరమస్య తస్య మేఽస్తు ॥ ౩౬ ॥
vyavahita-pṛtanā-mukhaṁ nirīkṣya
[vyavahita-pritanaa-mukham nireekshya]
sva-jana-vadhād vimukhasya doṣa-buddhyā
[sva-jana-vadhaad vimukhasya dosha-buddhyaa]
kumatim aharad ātma-vidyayā yaś
[kumatim aharad aatma-vidyayaa yash]
caraṇa-ratiḥ paramasya tasya me ’stu
[charana-ratih paramasya tasya me ’stu]
vyavahita — standing at a distance pṛtanā — soldiers mukham — faces nirīkṣya — by looking upon sva-jana — kinsmen vadhāt — from the act of killing vimukhasya — one who is reluctant doṣa-buddhyā — by polluted intelligence kumatim — poor fund of knowledge aharat — eradicated ātma-vidyayā — by transcendental knowledge yaḥ — He who caraṇa — to the feet ratiḥ — attraction paramasya — of the Supreme tasya — for Him me — my astu — let there be.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyavahita-pṛtanā-mukhaṁ nirīkṣya
vyavahita
standing at a distance
pṛtanā
soldiers
mukham
faces
nirīkṣya
by looking upon
sva-jana-vadhād vimukhasya doṣa-buddhyā
sva-jana
kinsmen
vadhāt
from the act of killing
vimukhasya
one who is reluctant
doṣa-buddhyā
by polluted intelligence
kumatim aharad ātma-vidyayā yaś
kumatim
poor fund of knowledge
aharat
eradicated
ātma-vidyayā
by transcendental knowledge
yaḥ
He who
caraṇa-ratiḥ paramasya tasya me ’stu
caraṇa
to the feet
ratiḥ
attraction
paramasya
of the Supreme
tasya
for Him
me
my
astu
let there be.
When Arjuna was seemingly polluted by ignorance upon observing the soldiers and commanders before him on the battlefield, the Lord eradicated his ignorance by delivering transcendental knowledge. May His lotus feet always remain the object of my attraction.

The kings and the commanders were to stand in the front of the fighting soldiers. That was the system of actual fighting. The kings and commanders were not so-called presidents or ministers of defense as they are today. They would not stay home while the poor soldiers or mercenaries were fighting face to face. This may be the regulation of modern democracy, but when actual monarchy was prevailing, the monarchs were not cowards elected without consideration of qualification. As it was evident from the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, all the executive heads of both parties, like Droṇa, Bhīṣma, Arjuna and Duryodhana, were not sleeping; all of them were actual participants in the fighting, which was selected to be executed at a place away from the civil residential quarters. This means that the innocent citizens were immune from all effects of fighting between the rival royal parties. The citizens had no business in seeing what was going to happen during such fighting. They were to pay one fourth of their income to the ruler, whether he be Arjuna or Duryodhana. All the commanders of the parties on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra were standing face to face, and Arjuna saw them with great compassion and lamented that he was to kill his kinsmen on the battlefield for the sake of the empire. He was not at all afraid of the giant military phalanx presented by Duryodhana, but as a merciful devotee of the Lord, renunciation of worldly things was natural for him, and thus he decided not to fight for worldly possessions. But this was due to a poor fund of knowledge, and therefore it is said here that his intelligence became polluted. His intelligence could not be polluted at any time because he was a devotee and constant companion of the Lord, as is clear in the Fourth Chapter of the Bhagavad-gītā. Apparently Arjuna’s intelligence became polluted because otherwise there would not have been a chance to deliver the teachings of Bhagavad-gītā for the good of all polluted conditioned souls engaged in material bondage by the conception of the false material body. The Bhagavad-gītā was delivered to the conditioned souls of the world to deliver them from the wrong conception of identifying the body with the soul and to reestablish the soul’s eternal relation with the Supreme Lord. Ātma-vidyā, or transcendental knowledge of Himself, was primarily spoken by the Lord for the benefit of all concerned in all parts of the universe.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
May I have prema for the feet of the Supreme Lord who, by giving knowledge of Himself, destroyed the ignorance of Arjuna who, on seeing the heads of the opposing army at a distance, refused to fight because he thought it was a sin to kill his relatives.
Commentary

Vyavahita-pṛtanā-mukhaṁ nirīkṣya means “seeing Bhīṣma and others standing in front of the army at a distance.” Arjuna became disinclined to kill his relatives.

evam uktvārjunaḥ saṅkhye rathopastha upāviśat | visṛjya saśaraṁ cāpaṁ śoka-saṁvigna-mānasaḥ ||

Speaking in this manner, Arjuna, giving up his bow and arrows, mind disturbed with lamentation, sat down on his chariot amidst the warriors assembled for battle. BG 1.46

This is described by the word kumatim. Arjuna’s loss of intelligence was caused by the Lord himself, like Yudhiṣṭhira’s present loss of intelligence, because loss of intelligence is impossible for the eternal associate of the Lord, who is also the avatāra, Nara. Kṛṣṇa did this in order to reveal Bhagavad-gītā, which delivers the whole world by showing the truth about Kṛṣṇa. Ātma-vidyayā means by knowledge fixed in Kṛṣṇa.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.37

↗
స్వనిగమమపహాయ మత్ప్రతిజ్ఞా- మృతమధికర్తుమవప్లుతో రథస్థ: । ధృతరథచరణోఽభ్యయాచ్చలద్గు- ర్హరిరివ హన్తుమిభం గతోత్తరీయ: ॥ ౩౭ ॥
sva-nigamam apahāya mat-pratijṣām
[sva-nigamam apahaaya mat-pratijshaam]
ṛtam adhikartum avapluto rathasthaḥ
[ritam adhikartum avapluto rathasthah]
dhṛta-ratha-caraṇo ’bhyayāc caladgur
[dhrita-ratha-charano ’bhyayaach chaladgur]
harir iva hantum ibhaṁ gatottarīyaḥ
[harir iva hantum ibham gatottareeyah]
sva-nigamam — own truthfulness apahāya — for nullifying mat-pratijṣām — my own promise ṛtam — factual adhi — more kartum — for doing it avaplutaḥ — getting down ratha-sthaḥ — from the chariot dhṛta — taking up ratha — chariot caraṇaḥ — wheel abhyayāt — went hurriedly caladguḥ — trampling the earth hariḥ — lion iva — like hantum — to kill ibham — elephant gata — leaving aside uttarīyaḥ — covering cloth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sva-nigamam apahāya mat-pratijṣām
sva-nigamam
own truthfulness
apahāya
for nullifying
mat-pratijṣām
my own promise
ṛtam adhikartum avapluto rathasthaḥ
ṛtam
factual
adhi
more
kartum
for doing it
avaplutaḥ
getting down
ratha-sthaḥ
from the chariot
dhṛta-ratha-caraṇo ’bhyayāc caladgur
dhṛta
taking up
ratha
chariot
caraṇaḥ
wheel
abhyayāt
went hurriedly
caladguḥ
trampling the earth
harir iva hantum ibhaṁ gatottarīyaḥ
hariḥ
lion
iva
like
hantum
to kill
ibham
elephant
gata
leaving aside
uttarīyaḥ
covering cloth.
Fulfilling my vow and sacrificing His own promise, He got down from the chariot, took up its wheel, and ran towards me hurriedly, just as a lion goes to kill an elephant. He even dropped His outer garment on the way.

The Battle of Kurukṣetra was fought on military principles but at the same time in a sporting spirit, like a friend’s fight with another friend. Duryodhana criticized Bhīṣmadeva, alleging that he was reluctant to kill Arjuna because of paternal affection. A kṣatriya cannot tolerate insults on the principle of fighting. Bhīṣmadeva therefore promised that the next day he would kill all five Pāṇḍavas with special weapons made for the purpose. Duryodhana was satisfied, and he kept the arrows with him to be delivered the next day during the fight. By tricks Arjuna took the arrows from Duryodhana, and Bhīṣmadeva could understand that this was the trick of Lord Kṛṣṇa. So he took a vow that the next day Kṛṣṇa would have to take up weapons Himself, otherwise His friend Arjuna would die. In the next day’s fighting Bhīṣmadeva fought so violently that both Arjuna and Kṛṣṇa were in trouble. Arjuna was almost defeated; the situation was so tense that he was about to be killed by Bhīṣmadeva the very next moment. At that time Lord Kṛṣṇa wanted to please His devotee, Bhīṣma, by keeping Bhīṣma’s promise, which was more important than His own. Seemingly He broke His own promise. He promised before the beginning of the Battle of Kurukṣetra that He would remain without weapons and would not use His strength for either of the parties. But to protect Arjuna He got down from the chariot, took up the wheel of the chariot and hurriedly rushed at Bhīṣmadeva in an angry mood, as a lion goes to kill an elephant. He dropped His covering cloth on the way, and out of great anger He did not know that He had dropped it. Bhīṣmadeva at once gave up his weapons and stood to be killed by Kṛṣṇa, his beloved Lord. The fighting of the day was thus ended at that very moment, and Arjuna was saved. Of course there was no possibility of Arjuna’s death because the Lord Himself was on the chariot, but because Bhīṣmadeva wanted to see Lord Kṛṣṇa take up some weapon to save His friend, the Lord created this situation, making Arjuna’s death appear imminent. He stood before Bhīṣmadeva to show him that his promise was fulfilled and that He had taken up the wheel.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Giving up his own promise not to fight, and making my vow to make him fight come true, Kṛṣṇa, situated on the chariot, quickly got down and holding the wheel of a chariot, ran towards me, like a lion coming to kill an elephant, while the earth shook and his top cloth fell to the ground.
Commentary

“It is said that Kṛṣṇa elevates his devotee to a higher position than his own. I saw that directly.” This is explained in two verses. Kṛṣṇa made a promise (sva-nigamam) that he would not take up weapons, but would only assist Arjuna. I made a promise that I would make him give up that promise and take up weapons. To make sure that this would become true, Kṛṣṇa, situated on the chariot, quickly got down from the chariot in such a manner that no one could see his separation from the chariot. Or Kṛṣṇa, though he got down, remained on the chariot to protect it in another form invisible to others. This pastime was spontaneously carried out, and was not because of my request. He took the wheel of the chariot and ran towards me. The earth trembled because of his great strength exerted through running in excitement. His cloth fell down. Because of his excited running he was not aware whether his cloth had fallen or not. Because Kṛṣṇa cannot give up his quality of affection for his devotee, when Arjuna would be unable to fight, Kṛṣṇa would give up his promise and use weapons to protect Arjuna. It is impossible for others to make Arjuna unable to fight. Thus overpowering Arjuna for a moment, I will see Kṛṣṇa fight as an indication of his affection for his devotee. Bhīṣma made this promise that Kṛṣṇa should take up weapons in order to fulfill this desire. Having seen Kṛṣṇa’s prema for Arjuna when he broke his own promise, and satisfying Bhīṣma, Kṛṣṇa’s excellence became famous in the world. That is the meaning of this incident.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.38

↗
శితవిశిఖహతో విశీర్ణదంశ: క్షతజపరిప్లుత ఆతతాయినో మే । ప్రసభమభిససార మద్వధార్థం స భవతు మే భగవాన్ గతిర్ముకున్ద: ॥ ౩౮ ॥
śita-viśikha-hato viśīrṇa-daṁśaḥ
[shita-vishikha-hato visheerna-damshah]
kṣataja-paripluta ātatāyino me
[kshataja-paripluta aatataayino me]
prasabham abhisasāra mad-vadhārthaṁ
[prasabham abhisasaara mad-vadhaartham]
sa bhavatu me bhagavān gatir mukundaḥ
[sa bhavatu me bhagavaan gatir mukundah]
śita — sharp viśikha — arrows hataḥ — wounded by viśīrṇa-daṁśaḥ — scattered shield kṣataja — by wounds pariplutaḥ — smeared with blood ātatāyinaḥ — the great aggressor me — my prasabham — in an angry mood abhisasāra — began to move on mat-vadha-artham — for the purpose of killing me saḥ — He bhavatu — may become me — my bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead gatiḥ — destination mukundaḥ — who awards salvation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śita-viśikha-hato viśīrṇa-daṁśaḥ
śita
sharp
viśikha
arrows
hataḥ
wounded by
viśīrṇa-daṁśaḥ
scattered shield
kṣataja-paripluta ātatāyino me
kṣataja
by wounds
pariplutaḥ
smeared with blood
ātatāyinaḥ
the great aggressor
me
my
prasabham abhisasāra mad-vadhārthaṁ
prasabham
in an angry mood
abhisasāra
began to move on
mat-vadha-artham
for the purpose of killing me
sa bhavatu me bhagavān gatir mukundaḥ
saḥ
He
bhavatu
may become
me
my
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
gatiḥ
destination
mukundaḥ
who awards salvation.
May He, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, who awards salvation, be my ultimate destination. On the battlefield He charged me, as if angry because of the wounds dealt by my sharp arrows. His shield was scattered, and His body was smeared with blood due to the wounds.

The dealings of Lord Kṛṣṇa and Bhīṣmadeva on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra are interesting because the activities of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa appeared to be partial to Arjuna and at enmity with Bhīṣmadeva; but factually all this was especially meant to show special favor to Bhīṣmadeva, a great devotee of the Lord. The astounding feature of such dealings is that a devotee can please the Lord by playing the part of an enemy. The Lord, being absolute, can accept service from His pure devotee even in the garb of an enemy. The Supreme Lord cannot have any enemy, nor can a so-called enemy harm Him because He is ajita, or unconquerable. But still He takes pleasure when His pure devotee beats Him like an enemy or rebukes Him from a superior position, although no one can be superior to the Lord. These are some of the transcendental reciprocatory dealings of the devotee with the Lord. And those who have no information of pure devotional service cannot penetrate into the mystery of such dealings. Bhīṣmadeva played the part of a valiant warrior, and he purposely pierced the body of the Lord so that to the common eyes it appeared that the Lord was wounded, but factually all this was to bewilder the nondevotees. The all-spiritual body cannot be wounded, and a devotee cannot become the enemy of the Lord. Had it been so, Bhīṣmadeva would not have desired to have the very same Lord as the ultimate destination of his life. Had Bhīṣmadeva been an enemy of the Lord, Lord Kṛṣṇa could have annihilated him without even moving. There was no need to come before Bhīṣmadeva with blood and wounds. But He did so because the warrior devotee wanted to see the transcendental beauty of the Lord decorated with wounds created by a pure devotee. This is the way of exchanging transcendental rasa, or relations between the Lord and the servitor. By such dealings both the Lord and the devotee become glorified in their respective positions. The Lord was so angry that Arjuna checked Him when He was moving towards Bhīṣmadeva, but in spite of Arjuna’s checking, He proceeded towards Bhīṣmadeva as a lover goes to a lover, without caring for hindrances. Apparently His determination was to kill Bhīṣmadeva, but factually it was to please him as a great devotee of the Lord. The Lord is undoubtedly the deliverer of all conditioned souls. The impersonalists desire salvation from Him, and He always awards them according to their aspiration, but here Bhīṣmadeva aspires to see the Lord in His personal feature. All pure devotees aspire for this.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Kṛṣṇa! Let my only goal be Mukunda, who, afflicted by my sharp arrows, armor broken, covered in blood, rushed towards me, his enemy, with great force, in order to kill me.
Commentary

When Kṛṣṇa got down from the chariot he became covered with blood, because the earth was covered with rivers of blood from the slain warriors. How did his armor get pierced? It was struck by my sharp arrows. I fired the arrows to increase the thrill of his anger. In other words, he pierced the armor before Kṛṣṇa got down from the chariot. With force (prasabham) he protected Arjuna and came towards me with the intention “Today I will kill Bhīṣma with my own hands.” The word abhisasāra is used to indicate a hero desiring to meet his lover. In a similar manner I became extraordinarily happy when Kṛṣṇa approached me in anger. May my goal be no one else, only Mukunda, giver of liberation, who acted in this way. O Kṛṣṇa! I have offered only this prayer to you.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.39

↗
విజయరథకుటుమ్బ ఆత్తతోత్రే ధృతహయరశ్మిని తచ్ఛ్రియేక్షణీయే । భగవతి రతిరస్తు మే ముమూర్షో- ర్యమిహ నిరీక్ష్య హతా గతా: స్వరూపమ్ ॥ ౩౯ ॥
vijaya-ratha-kuṭumbha ātta-totre
[vijaya-ratha-kutumbha aatta-totre]
dhṛta-haya-raśmini tac-chriyekṣaṇīye
[dhrita-haya-rashmini tach-chriyekshaneeye]
bhagavati ratir astu me mumūrṣor
[bhagavati ratir astu me mumoorshor]
yam iha nirīkṣya hatā gatāḥ sva-rūpam
[yam iha nireekshya hataa gataah sva-roopam]
vijaya — Arjuna ratha — chariot kuṭumbe — the object of protection at all risk ātta-totre — with a whip in the right hand dhṛta-haya — controlling the horses raśmini — ropes tat-śriyā — beautifully standing īkṣaṇīye — to look at bhagavati — unto the Personality of Godhead ratiḥ astu — let my attraction be me — my mumūrṣoḥ — one who is about to die yam — upon whom iha — in this world nirīkṣya — by looking hatāḥ — those who died gatāḥ — attained sva-rūpam — original form.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vijaya-ratha-kuṭumbha ātta-totre
vijaya
Arjuna
ratha
chariot
kuṭumbe
the object of protection at all risk
ātta-totre
with a whip in the right hand
dhṛta-haya-raśmini tac-chriyekṣaṇīye
dhṛta-haya
controlling the horses
raśmini
ropes
tat-śriyā
beautifully standing
bhagavati ratir astu me mumūrṣor
yam iha nirīkṣya hatā gatāḥ sva-rūpam
īkṣaṇīye
to look at
bhagavati
unto the Personality of Godhead
ratiḥ astu
let my attraction be
me
my
mumūrṣoḥ
one who is about to die
yam
upon whom
iha
in this world
nirīkṣya
by looking
hatāḥ
those who died
gatāḥ
attained
sva-rūpam
original form.
At the moment of death, let my ultimate attraction be to Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead. I concentrate my mind upon the chariot driver of Arjuna who stood with a whip in His right hand and a bridle rope in His left, who was very careful to give protection to Arjuna’s chariot by all means. Those who saw Him on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra attained their original forms after death.

A pure devotee of the Lord constantly sees the presence of the Lord within himself because of being transcendentally related by loving service. Such a pure devotee cannot forget the Lord for a moment. This is called trance. The mystic ( yogī ) tries to concentrate upon the Supersoul by controlling the senses from all other engagements, and thus he ultimately attains samādhi. A devotee more easily attains samādhi, or trance, by constantly remembering the Lord’s personal feature along with His holy name, fame, pastimes, etc. Therefore, the concentration of the mystic yogī and that of the devotee are not on the same level. The concentration of the mystic is mechanical, whereas that of the pure devotee is natural in pure love and spontaneous affection. Bhīṣmadeva was a pure devotee, and as a military marshal he constantly remembered the battlefield feature of the Lord as Pārtha-sārathi, the chariot driver of Arjuna. Therefore, the Lord’s pastime as Pārtha-sārathi is also eternal. The pastimes of the Lord, beginning from His birth at the prison house of Kaṁsa up to the mauśala-līlā at the end, all move one after another in all the universes, just as the clock hand moves from one point to another. And in such pastimes His associates like the Pāṇḍavas and Bhīṣma are constant eternal companions. So Bhīṣmadeva never forgot the beautiful feature of the Lord as Pārtha-sārathi, which even Arjuna could not see. Arjuna was behind the beautiful Pārtha-sārathi while Bhīṣmadeva was just in front of the Lord. As far as the military feature of the Lord is concerned, Bhīṣmadeva observed this with more relish than Arjuna.

All the soldiers and persons on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra attained their original spiritual form like the Lord after their death because by the causeless mercy of the Lord they were able to see Him face to face on that occasion. The conditioned souls rotating in the evolutionary cycle from the aquatics up to the form of Brahmā are all in the form of māyā, or the form obtained by one’s own actions and awarded by material nature. The material forms of the conditioned souls are all foreign dresses, and when the conditioned soul becomes liberated from the clutches of material energy, he attains his original form. The impersonalist wants to attain the impersonal Brahman effulgence of the Lord, but that is not at all congenial to the living sparks, parts and parcels of the Lord. Therefore, the impersonalists again fall down and get material forms, which are all false to the spirit soul. A spiritual form like the Lord’s, either two-handed or four-handed, is attained by the devotees of the Lord either in the Vaikuṇṭhas or in the Goloka planet, according to the original nature of the soul. This form, which is cent-percent spiritual, is the svarūpa of the living being, and all the living beings who participated on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, on both sides, attained their svarūpa, as confirmed by Bhīṣmadeva. So Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was not merciful only to the Pāṇḍavas; He was also merciful to the other parties because all of them attained the same result. Bhīṣmadeva wanted the same facility also, and that was his prayer to the Lord, although his position as an associate of the Lord is assured in all circumstances. The conclusion is that whoever dies looking on the Personality of Godhead within or without attains his svarūpa, which is the highest perfection of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Desiring to die, may I have prema for the Lord who protected Arjuna’s chariot while holding a whip in his right hand, the reins in his left hand, whose beauty must be seen, and who bestowed liberation to those who died on the battle field after seeing him.
Commentary

Bhīṣma has a desire that even the unrighteous should develop prema for Kṛṣṇa, who is eager to protect his devotees. Kṛṣṇa protected (kuṭumbe) Arjuna (vijaya) from the sinful. He held a whip (totre). He held the reins of the horses. I, and not Arjuna, saw with my eyes, his beauty as he held the reins in his left hand, the whip in his right hand, while saying “Hum, hum” to speed the horses. May I have prema for that Kṛṣṇa. I desire to die now (mumūrṣoḥ), for having died, I will constantly see that sweetness. If I am revived how will I see that, because the Lord has brought about an end to his pastimes on this earth? Bhīṣma does not say “I am dying” but “I want to die.” He could die when he chose, and now he had developed great greed for directly participating in Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes. From this it is understood that the fighting pastimes are also eternal, what to speak of other pastimes.

“True, you have great attachment to my pastime as a charioteer, and relish that in each of your verses, spout them from your mouth. You pray for prema for me in that pastime. But having died, what is your proof that you will attain that pastime?”

“There is a well known saying maraṇe yā matiḥ sā gatiḥ: whatever you think of when you die, you attain that. Seeing you at present is the highest proof. By seeing you those who die, even being killed by others in this battle, even if they are demons, attain liberation (sva-rūpam) of merging in brahman similar to the jṣānīs. But I am a devotee, with thoughts just described, and dying while seeing you personally at the time of death, how can I not attain that pastime? The form of Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer bestowed liberation even to unqualified persons (demons). Simultaneously, at that time the most extraordinary of all the Lord’s forms, full of the greatest sweetness, characterized by no power and great power made its appearance (for the devotees).”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.40

↗
లలితగతివిలాసవల్గుహాస- ప్రణయనిరీక్షణకల్పితోరుమానా: । కృతమనుకృతవత్య ఉన్మదాన్ధా: ప్రకృతిమగన్ కిల యస్య గోపవధ్వ: ॥ ౪౦ ॥
lalita-gati-vilāsa-valguhāsa-
[lalita-gati-vilaasa-valguhaasa-]
praṇaya-nirīkṣaṇa-kalpitorumānāḥ
[pranaya-nireekshana-kalpitorumaanaah]
kṛtam anukṛtavatya unmadāndhāḥ
[kritam anukritavatya unmadaandhaah]
prakṛtim agan kila yasya gopa-vadhvaḥ
[prakritim agan kila yasya gopa-vadhvah]
lalita — attractive gati — movements vilāsa — fascinating acts valgu-hāsa — sweet smiling praṇaya — loving nirīkṣaṇa — looking upon kalpita — mentality urumānāḥ — highly glorified kṛtam anukṛtavatyaḥ — in the act of copying the movements unmada-andhāḥ — gone mad in ecstasy prakṛtim — characteristics agan — underwent kila — certainly yasya — whose gopa-vadhvaḥ — the cowherd damsels.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
lalita-gati-vilāsa-valguhāsa-
lalita
attractive
gati
movements
vilāsa
fascinating acts
valgu-hāsa
sweet smiling
praṇaya-nirīkṣaṇa-kalpitorumānāḥ
praṇaya
loving
nirīkṣaṇa
looking upon
kalpita
mentality
urumānāḥ
highly glorified
kṛtam anukṛtavatya unmadāndhāḥ
kṛtam anukṛtavatyaḥ
in the act of copying the movements
unmada-andhāḥ
gone mad in ecstasy
prakṛtim agan kila yasya gopa-vadhvaḥ
prakṛtim
characteristics
agan
underwent
kila
certainly
yasya
whose
gopa-vadhvaḥ
the cowherd damsels.
Let my mind be fixed upon Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, whose motions and smiles of love attracted the damsels of Vrajadhāma [the gopīs]. The damsels imitated the characteristic movements of the Lord [after His disappearance from the rāsa dance].

By intense ecstasy in loving service, the damsels of Vrajabhūmi attained qualitative oneness with the Lord by dancing with Him on an equal level, embracing Him in nuptial love, smiling at Him in joke, and looking at Him with a loving attitude. The relation of the Lord with Arjuna is undoubtedly praiseworthy for devotees like Bhīṣmadeva, but the relation of the gopīs with the Lord is still more praiseworthy because of their still more purified loving service. By the grace of the Lord, Arjuna was fortunate enough to have the fraternal service of the Lord as chariot driver, but the Lord did not award Arjuna with equal strength. The gopīs, however, practically became one with the Lord by attainment of equal footing with the Lord. Bhīṣma’s aspiration to remember the gopīs is a prayer to have their mercy also at the last stage of his life. The Lord is satisfied more when His pure devotees are glorified, and therefore Bhīṣmadeva has not only glorified the acts of Arjuna, his immediate object of attraction, but has also remembered the gopīs, who were endowed with unrivalled opportunities for rendering loving service to the Lord. The gopīs ’ equality with the Lord should never be misunderstood to be like the sāyujya liberation of the impersonalist. The equality is one of perfect ecstasy where the differential conception is completely eradicated, for the interests of the lover and the beloved become identical.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The gopīs were worshipped by Kṛṣṇa’s expert actions, emotional displays, words and glances. Attaining those qualities, they responded in harmony to his most extraordinary displays of love, blinded by the madness of love. How amazing that these gopīs attained the nature of Kṛṣṇa himself.
Commentary

“Though you are omniscient, the prema that you desire in my charioteer pastime is in Arjuna alone. It is understood that among all the associates with prema, he is the chief.” That is not so. Your dear gopīs have the most exalted prema among all devotees. They are superior to Arjuna. No one can dare to pray for their position. Let that be! I will be successful at my death just by indicating their nature. Thus he speaks this verse.

He was expert at physical arts such as dancing in the rāsa-līlā, expert in expressing mental qualities such as dhira-lalita, expert in words with joking, expert with the eyes at glancing to show all aspects of prema. The gopīs were to be worshipped by all these skilful actions of Kṛṣṇa. In order to please them, Kṛṣṇa endowed them with all the best, outstanding qualities of himself. The result of their extreme prema, was that Kṛṣṇa, in giving all his own qualities, attempted to please them with conciliating love. That display of love, which is without restraints for either party, showed extreme control of Kṛṣṇa by the gopīs and was filled with great bliss. Control of the Lord, manifested as a result of Arjuna’s prema, was that Kṛṣṇa became his messenger and charioteer. That role had restraints for both parties. Arjuna could thus not attain intimacy with the Lord.

He became compliant by offering all his qualities to them (gopīs). They had a mutual friendship filled with happiness because of mutual compliance. Then he bestowed an extraordinary fortune—the dancing, songs and speech during the rāsa-līlā. And in response, the gopīs did the same (anukṛta-vatya). In harmony with him, they offered him dancing, songs and speech in the rāsa-līlā. There was no need to teach them anything. They were blinded by the increase of great prema (unmadāndhāḥ). They did not need practice. How astonishing (kila)! They attained all his extraordinary qualities such as skills in dancing and singing. Kṛṣṇa did not give his unique, extraordinary power to Arjuna.

Kṛtam can also refer to Kṛṣṇa’s actions such as lifting Govardhana. They imitated those actions. Instead of unmada sometimes unmāda is seen. This indicates madness in separation. In that extreme state some of them even merged with the Lord. This is the highest level of exalted prema. Since I am situated between the two limits, why can I not attain your pastime as the charioteer, which I desire?

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.41

↗
మునిగణనృపవర్యసఙ్కులేఽన్త: సదసి యుధిష్ఠిరరాజసూయ ఏషామ్ । అర్హణముపపేద ఈక్షణీయో మమ ద‍ృశిగోచర ఏష ఆవిరాత్మా ॥ ౪౧ ॥
muni-gaṇa-nṛpa-varya-saṅkule ’ntaḥ-
[muni-gana-nripa-varya-sankule ’ntah-]
sadasi yudhiṣṭhira-rājasūya eṣām
[sadasi yudhishthira-raajasooya eshaam]
arhaṇam upapeda īkṣaṇīyo
[arhanam upapeda eekshaneeyo]
mama dṛśi-gocara eṣa āvir ātmā
[mama drishi-gochara esha aavir aatmaa]
muni-gaṇa — the great learned sages nṛpa-varya — the great ruling kings saṅkule — in the great assembly of antaḥ-sadasi — conference yudhiṣṭhira — of Emperor Yudhiṣṭhira rāja-sūye — a royal performance of sacrifice eṣām — of all the great elites arhaṇam — respectful worship upapeda — received īkṣaṇīyaḥ — the object of attraction mama — my dṛśi — sight gocaraḥ — within the view of eṣaḥ āviḥ — personally present ātmā — the soul.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
muni-gaṇa-nṛpa-varya-saṅkule ’ntaḥ-
muni-gaṇa
the great learned sages
nṛpa-varya
the great ruling kings
saṅkule
in the great assembly of
sadasi yudhiṣṭhira-rājasūya eṣām
arhaṇam upapeda īkṣaṇīyo
antaḥ-sadasi
conference
yudhiṣṭhira
of Emperor Yudhiṣṭhira
mama dṛśi-gocara eṣa āvir ātmā
rāja-sūye
a royal performance of sacrifice
eṣām
of all the great elites
arhaṇam
respectful worship
upapeda
received
īkṣaṇīyaḥ
the object of attraction
mama
my
dṛśi
sight
gocaraḥ
within the view of
eṣaḥ āviḥ
personally present
ātmā
the soul.
At the Rājasūya-yajṣa [sacrifice] performed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, there was the greatest assembly of all the elite men of the world, the royal and learned orders, and in that great assembly Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was worshiped by one and all as the most exalted Personality of Godhead. This happened during my presence, and I remembered the incident in order to keep my mind upon the Lord.

After gaining victory in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, the Emperor of the world, performed the Rājasūya sacrificial ceremony. The emperor, in those days, upon his ascendance to the throne, would send a challenge horse all over the world to declare his supremacy, and any ruling prince or king was at liberty to accept the challenge and express his tacit willingness either to obey or to disobey the supremacy of the particular emperor. One who accepted the challenge had to fight with the emperor and establish his own supremacy by victory. The defeated king would have to sacrifice his life, making a place for another king or ruler. So Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira also dispatched such challenging horses all over the world, and every ruling prince and king all over the world accepted Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira’s leadership as the Emperor of the world. After this, all rulers of the world under the regime of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira were invited to participate in the great sacrificial ceremony of Rājasūya. Such performances required hundreds of millions of dollars, and it was not an easy job for a petty king. Such a sacrificial ceremony, being too expensive and also difficult to perform under present circumstances, is now impossible in this Age of Kali. Nor can anyone secure the required expert priesthood to take charge of the ceremony.

So, after being invited, all the kings and great learned sages of the world assembled in the capital of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. The learned society, including the great philosophers, religionists, physicians, scientists and all great sages, was invited. That is to say, the brāhmaṇas and the kṣatriyas were the topmost leading men in society, and they were all invited to participate in the assembly. The vaiśyas and śūdras were unimportant elements in society, and they are not mentioned herein. Due to the change of social activities in the modern age, the importance of men has also changed in terms of occupational positions.

So in that great assembly, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was the cynosure of neighboring eyes. Everyone wanted to see Lord Kṛṣṇa, and everyone wanted to pay his humble respects to the Lord. Bhīṣmadeva remembered all this and was glad that his worshipful Lord, the Personality of Godhead, was present before him in His actual formal presence. So to meditate on the Supreme Lord is to meditate on the activities, form, pastimes, name and fame of the Lord. That is easier than what is imagined as meditation on the impersonal feature of the Supreme. In the Bhagavad-gītā (12.5) it is clearly stated that to meditate upon the impersonal feature of the Supreme is very difficult. It is practically no meditation or simply a waste of time because very seldom is the desired result obtained. The devotees, however, meditate upon the Lord’s factual form and pastimes, and therefore the Lord is easily approachable by the devotees. This is also stated in the Bhagavad-gītā (12.9) . The Lord is nondifferent from His transcendental activities. It is indicated also in this śloka that Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, while actually present before human society, especially in connection with the Battle of Kurukṣetra, was accepted as the greatest personality of the time, although He might not have been recognized as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The propaganda that a very great man is worshiped as God after his death is misleading because a man after his death cannot be made into God. Nor can the Personality of Godhead be a human being, even when He is personally present. Both ideas are misconceptions. The idea of anthropomorphism cannot be applicable in the case of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The lord of my life, worthy of being seen, who received the worship of all the greatest sages and kings in the assembly during the rājasūya sacrifice of Yudhiṣṭhira, has become visible to my eyes.
Commentary

Bhīṣma relates his great fortune which is directly visible now, to the necessity of attaining the Lord. Kṛṣṇa was seen with amazement by the sages exclaiming “O what beauty! What greatness!” In the midst of the gathering composed of the best sages and kings, during the rājasūya sacrifice of Yudhiṣṭhira, he received (upapede) worship. He, my soul, the lord of my life (mama ātmā), is now visible to my eyes. He has fulfilled my request.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.42

↗
తమిమమహమజం శరీరభాజాం హృది హృది ధిష్ఠితమాత్మకల్పితానామ్ । ప్రతిద‍ృశమివ నైకధార్కమేకం సమధిగతోఽస్మి విధూతభేదమోహ: ॥ ౪౨ ॥
tam imam aham ajaṁ śarīra-bhājāṁ
[tam imam aham ajam shareera-bhaajaam]
hṛdi hṛdi dhiṣṭhitam ātma-kalpitānām
[hridi hridi dhishthitam aatma-kalpitaanaam]
pratidṛśam iva naikadhārkam ekaṁ
[pratidrisham iva naikadhaarkam ekam]
samadhi-gato ’smi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ
[samadhi-gato ’smi vidhoota-bheda-mohah]
tam — that Personality of Godhead imam — now present before me aham — I ajam — the unborn śarīra-bhājām — of the conditioned soul hṛdi — in the heart hṛdi — in the heart dhiṣṭhitam — situated ātma — the Supersoul kalpitānām — of the speculators pratidṛśam — in every direction iva — like na ekadhā — not one arkam — the sun ekam — one only samadhigataḥ asmi — I have undergone trance in meditation vidhūta — being freed from bheda-mohaḥ — misconception of duality.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam imam aham ajaṁ śarīra-bhājāṁ
tam
that Personality of Godhead
imam
now present before me
aham
I
ajam
the unborn
śarīra-bhājām
of the conditioned soul
hṛdi hṛdi dhiṣṭhitam ātma-kalpitānām
hṛdi
in the heart
hṛdi
in the heart
dhiṣṭhitam
situated
ātma
the Supersoul
kalpitānām
of the speculators
pratidṛśam iva naikadhārkam ekaṁ
pratidṛśam
in every direction
iva
like
na ekadhā
not one
arkam
the sun
ekam
one only
samadhi-gato ’smi vidhūta-bheda-mohaḥ
samadhigataḥ asmi
I have undergone trance in meditation
vidhūta
being freed from
bheda-mohaḥ
misconception of duality.
Now I can meditate with full concentration upon that one Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, now present before me because now I have transcended the misconceptions of duality in regard to His presence in everyone’s heart, even in the hearts of the mental speculators. He is in everyone’s heart. The sun may be perceived differently, but the sun is one.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the one Absolute Supreme Personality of Godhead, but He has expanded Himself into His multiplenary portions by His inconceivable energy. The conception of duality is due to ignorance of His inconceivable energy. In the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) the Lord says that only the foolish take Him to be a mere human being. Such foolish men are not aware of His inconceivable energies. By His inconceivable energy He is present in everyone’s heart, as the sun is present before everyone all over the world. The Paramātmā feature of the Lord is an expansion of His plenary portions. He expands Himself as Paramātmā in everyone’s heart by His inconceivable energy, and He also expands Himself as the glowing effulgence of brahmajyoti by expansion of His personal glow. It is stated in the Brahma-saṁhitā that the brahmajyoti is His personal glow. Therefore, there is no difference between Him and His personal glow, brahmajyoti, or His plenary portions as Paramātmā. Less intelligent persons who are not aware of this fact consider brahmajyoti and Paramātmā to be different from Śrī Kṛṣṇa. This misconception of duality is completely removed from the mind of Bhīṣmadeva, and he is now satisfied that it is Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa only who is all in all in everything. This enlightenment is attained by the great mahātmās or devotees, as it is stated in Bhagavad-gītā (7.19) that Vāsudeva is all in all in everything and that there is no existence of anything without Vāsudeva. Vāsudeva, or Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is the original Supreme Person, as now confirmed by a mahājana, and therefore both the neophytes and the pure devotees must try to follow in his footsteps. That is the way of the devotional line.

The worshipable object of Bhīṣmadeva is Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa as Pārtha-sārathi, and that of the gopīs is the same Kṛṣṇa in Vṛndāvana as the most attractive Śyāmasundara. Sometimes less intelligent scholars make a mistake and think that the Kṛṣṇa of Vṛndāvana and that of the Battle of Kurukṣetra are different personalities. But for Bhīṣmadeva this misconception is completely removed. Even the impersonalist’s object of destination is Kṛṣṇa as the impersonal jyoti, and the yogī’s destination of Paramātmā is also Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa is both brahmajyoti and localized Paramātmā, but in brahmajyoti or Paramātmā there is no Kṛṣṇa or sweet relations with Kṛṣṇa. In His personal feature Kṛṣṇa is both Pārtha-sārathi and Śyāmasundara of Vṛndāvana, but in His impersonal feature He is neither in the brahmajyoti nor in the Paramātmā. Great mahātmās like Bhīṣmadeva realize all these different features of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and therefore they worship Lord Kṛṣṇa, knowing Him as the origin of all features.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Freed of the illusion of difference in the Lord’s various forms, I have attained the Lord who is one though appearing to be many like the sun seen by many people, who is the charioteer, but who is also in my heart, the unborn and is situated in the hearts of all the jīvas, who create their own bodies.
Commentary

Why do you not address the Lord directly but instead address him indirectly with word like vijaya-sakhe vijaya-ratha-kuṭumba me ratir astu and caraṇa-ratiḥ paramasya tasya me ’stu and sa bhavatu me bhagavān gatir.” This verse answers, indicating that Bhīiṣma desires the Lord as a charioteer.

I have attained that Lord (tam) who is the charioteer of Arjuna, holding the whip and bridle in his hands, who is now appearing in my heart (imam). But the charioteer is not the Lord in the heart. Because Kṛṣṇa the charioteer has already entered and pervaded my heart completely by practice, it is not possible for the paramātmā to enter. He does not make his appearance just at this time (ajam). Though he appeared to my eyes in this form at the time of battle, even before the battle he was already in my heart because of my spontaneous desire. He is unborn because he has always been visible to me. There is no fault on my part in this, but the Supreme Lord alone situated in the heart ordains good fortunate or misfortune of the jīvas. He is situated (dhiṣṭhitam) in the hearts of all jīvas (śarīra-bhājām), who create their own bodies. The missing “a” in (dhiṣṭhitam) is for meter. The śruti says yathāgneḥ kṣudrā visphuliṅga vyuccaranti; the souls wander around like small sparks. (Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 2.1.20)

I know that the charioteer indicated by the word tam and the four-handed form in Dvārakā indicated by the word imam are not different. The one sun in the sky appears to individual seers to be not one but many, above each person’s head. By such distinctive seeing the sun appears to be many. Bhīṣma is free of such illusionary seeing (vidhūta-bheda-moha). Though Kṛṣṇa appears in my heart, and in the hearts of Yudhiṣṭhira, Vasudeva, Uddhava, Nanda and the gopīs with various degrees of prema and type of love, with different pastimes for each, I know that this is one Kṛṣṇa only. I know the various degrees of excellence of their prema and love. But I can never give up my natural attachment to the form of Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer. Even thinking of the four-handed form of Kṛṣṇa in Dvārakā is not interesting to me.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.43

↗
సూత ఉవాచ కృష్ణ ఏవం భగవతి మనోవాగ్ద‍ృష్టివృత్తిభి: । ఆత్మన్యాత్మానమావేశ్య సోఽన్త:శ్వాస ఉపారమత్ ॥ ౪౩ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
kṛṣṇa evaṁ bhagavati
[krishna evam bhagavati]
mano-vāg-dṛṣṭi-vṛttibhiḥ
[mano-vaag-drishti-vrittibhih]
ātmany ātmānam āveśya
[aatmany aatmaanam aaveshya]
so ’ntaḥśvāsa upāramat
[so ’ntahshvaasa upaaramat]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta Gosvāmī said kṛṣṇe — Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead evam — only bhagavati — unto Him manaḥ — with mind vāk — speech dṛṣṭi — sight vṛttibhiḥ — activities ātmani — unto the Supersoul ātmānam — the living being āveśya — having merged in saḥ — he antaḥ-śvāsaḥ — inhaling upāramat — became silent.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta Gosvāmī said
kṛṣṇa evaṁ bhagavati
kṛṣṇe
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead
evam
only
bhagavati
unto Him
mano-vāg-dṛṣṭi-vṛttibhiḥ
manaḥ
with mind
vāk
speech
dṛṣṭi
sight
vṛttibhiḥ
activities
ātmany ātmānam āveśya
ātmani
unto the Supersoul
ātmānam
the living being
āveśya
having merged in
so ’ntaḥśvāsa upāramat
saḥ
he
antaḥ-śvāsaḥ
inhaling
upāramat
became silent.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus Bhīṣmadeva merged himself in the Supersoul, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, with his mind, speech, sight and actions, and thus he became silent, and his breathing stopped.

The stage attained by Bhīṣmadeva while quitting his material body is called nirvikalpa-samādhi because he merged his self into thinking of the Lord and his mind into remembering His different activities. He chanted the glories of the Lord, and by his sight he began to see the Lord personally present before him, and thus all his activities became concentrated upon the Lord without deviation. This is the highest stage of perfection, and it is possible for everyone to attain this stage by practice of devotional service. The devotional service of the Lord consists of nine principles of service activities, and they are (1) hearing, (2) chanting, (3) remembering, (4) serving the lotus feet, (5) worshiping, (6) praying, (7) executing the orders, (8) fraternizing, and (9) fully surrendering. Any one of them or all of them are equally competent to award the desired result, but they require to be practiced persistently under the guidance of an expert devotee of the Lord. The first item, hearing, is the most important item of all, and therefore hearing of the Bhagavad-gītā and, later on, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is essential for the serious candidate who wants to attain the stage of Bhīṣmadeva at the end. The unique situation at Bhīṣmadeva’s time of death can be attained, even though Lord Kṛṣṇa may not be personally present. His words of the Bhagavad-gītā or those of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam are identical with the Lord. They are sound incarnations of the Lord, and one can fully utilize them to be entitled to attain the stage of Śrī Bhīṣmadeva, who was one of the eight Vasus. Every man or animal must die at a certain stage of life, but one who dies like Bhīṣmadeva attains perfection, and one who dies forced by the laws of nature dies like an animal. That is the difference between a man and an animal. The human form of life is especially meant for dying like Bhīṣmadeva.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Suta said: Thus Bhīṣma, absorbing himself in Kṛṣṇa, bhagavān, the charioteer situated in his heart, using his mind, words and sight, stopped his breathing and ceased external functions.
Commentary

He absorbed himself (ātmānam āveśya) in Kṛṣṇa, the charioteer, situated in his heart (ātmani), and stopped his breathing (antaḥśvāsaḥ). Upāramat means he stopped external functioning.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.44

↗
సమ్పద్యమానమాజ్ఞాయ భీష్మం బ్రహ్మణి నిష్కలే । సర్వే బభూవుస్తే తూష్ణీం వయాంసీవ దినాత్యయే ॥ ౪౪ ॥
sampadyamānam ājṣāya
[sampadyamaanam aajshaaya]
bhīṣmaṁ brahmaṇi niṣkale
[bheeshmam brahmani nishkale]
sarve babhūvus te tūṣṇīṁ
[sarve babhoovus te tooshneem]
vayāṁsīva dinātyaye
[vayaamseeva dinaatyaye]
sampadyamānam — having merged into ājṣāya — after knowing this bhīṣmam — about Śrī Bhīṣmadeva brahmaṇi — into the Supreme Absolute niṣkale — unlimited sarve — all present babhūvuḥ te — all of them became tūṣṇīm — silent vayāṁsi iva — like birds dina-atyaye — at the end of the day.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sampadyamānam ājṣāya
sampadyamānam
having merged into
ājṣāya
after knowing this
bhīṣmaṁ brahmaṇi niṣkale
bhīṣmam
about Śrī Bhīṣmadeva
brahmaṇi
into the Supreme Absolute
niṣkale
unlimited
sarve babhūvus te tūṣṇīṁ
sarve
all present
babhūvuḥ te
all of them became
tūṣṇīm
silent
vayāṁsīva dinātyaye
vayāṁsi iva
like birds
dina-atyaye
at the end of the day.
Knowing that Bhīṣmadeva had merged into the unlimited eternity of the Supreme Absolute, all present there became silent like birds at the end of the day.

To enter into or to become merged into the unlimited eternity of the Supreme Absolute means to enter the original home of the living being. The living beings are all component parts and parcels of the Absolute Personality of Godhead, and therefore they are eternally related with Him as the servitor and the served. The Lord is served by all His parts and parcels, as the complete machine is served by its parts and parcels. Any part of the machine removed from the whole is no longer important. Similarly, any part and parcel of the Absolute detached from the service of the Lord is useless. The living beings who are in the material world are all disintegrated parts and parcels of the supreme whole, and they are no longer as important as the original parts and parcels. There are, however, more integrated living beings who are eternally liberated. The material energy of the Lord, called Durgā-śakti, or the superintendent of the prison house, takes charge of the disintegrated parts and parcels, and thus they undergo a conditioned life under the laws of material nature. When the living being becomes conscious of this fact, he tries to go back home, back to Godhead, and thus the spiritual urge of the living being begins. This spiritual urge is called brahma-jijṣāsā, or inquiry about Brahman. Principally this brahma-jijṣāsā is successful by knowledge, renunciation and devotional service to the Lord. Jṣāna, or knowledge, means knowledge of everything of Brahman, the Supreme; renunciation means detachment of material affection, and devotional service is the revival by practice of the original position of the living being. The successful living beings who are eligible to enter into the realm of the Absolute are called the jṣānīs, the yogīs and the bhaktas. The jṣānīs and yogīs enter into the impersonal rays of the Supreme, but the bhaktas enter into the spiritual planets known as the Vaikuṇṭhas. In these spiritual planets the Supreme Lord as Nārāyaṇa predominates, and the healthy, unconditioned living beings live there by rendering loving service to the Lord in the capacity of servant, friend, parents and fiancee. There the unconditioned living beings enjoy life in full freedom with the Lord, whereas the impersonalist jṣānīs and yogīs enter into the impersonal glowing effulgence of the Vaikuṇṭha planets. The Vaikuṇṭha planets are all self-illuminating like the sun, and the rays of the Vaikuṇṭha planets are called the brahmajyoti. The brahmajyoti is spread unlimitedly, and the material world is but a covered portion of an insignificant part of the same brahmajyoti. This covering is temporary, and therefore it is a sort of illusion.

Bhīṣmadeva, as a pure devotee of the Lord, entered the spiritual realm in one of the Vaikuṇṭha planets where the Lord in His eternal form of Pārtha-sārathi predominates over the unconditioned living beings who are constantly engaged in the service of the Lord. The love and affection which bind the Lord and devotee are exhibited in the case of Bhīṣmadeva. Bhīṣmadeva never forgot the Lord in His transcendental feature as the pārtha-sārathi, and the Lord was present personally before Bhīṣmadeva while he was passing to the transcendental world. That is the highest perfection of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The ignorant, who were like birds who think that day has been destroyed at the approach of evening, thought that Bhīṣma had attained the brahman, and became silent.
Commentary

Bhīṣma had attained his cherished form of Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer, but the common people, not knowing this though that he had entered into brahman. That is expressed in this verse. An example of ignorance is given. Birds, thinking that the day has been destroyed at the end of day because they cannot see it, become silent. The day has not actually be destroyed, because one understands that after some time, that day still exists, since after twelve hours daylight appears again. The ignorant think that when Bhīṣma passed away he attained liberation. The intelligent understand that at that very moment in an invisible form Bhīṣma fights on the ground with Kṛṣṇa holding the chariot wheel in his hand, and that in a future appearance of Kṛṣṇa, Bhīṣma will also appear with him. Or brahmaṇi niṣkali can mean “into the brahman Kṛṣṇa, who wears a gold ornament.” One should not explain that Bhīṣma merged into the brahman, since by giving him something devoid of his goal, this would be cheating his eternal associate Bhīṣma of prema, since Bhīṣma did not desire liberation, and since it would be improper for the Lord to give undesired results forcibly.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.45

↗
తత్ర దున్దుభయో నేదుర్దేవమానవవాదితా: । శశంసు: సాధవో రాజ్ఞాం ఖాత్పేతు: పుష్పవృష్టయ: ॥ ౪౫ ॥
tatra dundubhayo nedur
[tatra dundubhayo nedur]
deva-mānava-vāditāḥ
[deva-maanava-vaaditaah]
śaśaṁsuḥ sādhavo rājṣāṁ
[shashamsuh saadhavo raajshaam]
khāt petuḥ puṣpa-vṛṣṭayaḥ
[khaat petuh pushpa-vrishtayah]
tatra — thereafter dundubhayaḥ — drums neduḥ — were sounded deva — the demigods from other planets mānava — men from all countries vāditāḥ — beaten by śaśaṁsuḥ — praised sādhavaḥ — honest rājṣām — by the royal order khāt — from the sky petuḥ — began to fall puṣpa-vṛṣṭayaḥ — showers of flowers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra dundubhayo nedur
tatra
thereafter
dundubhayaḥ
drums
neduḥ
were sounded
deva-mānava-vāditāḥ
deva
the demigods from other planets
mānava
men from all countries
vāditāḥ
beaten by
śaśaṁsuḥ sādhavo rājṣāṁ
śaśaṁsuḥ
praised
sādhavaḥ
honest
rājṣām
by the royal order
khāt petuḥ puṣpa-vṛṣṭayaḥ
khāt
from the sky
petuḥ
began to fall
puṣpa-vṛṣṭayaḥ
showers of flowers.
Thereafter, both men and demigods sounded drums in honor, and the honest royal order commenced demonstrations of honor and respect. And from the sky fell showers of flowers.

Bhīṣmadeva was respected both by the human beings and by the demigods. The human beings live on earth and similar other planets in the Bhūr and Bhuvar group of planets, but the demigods live in the Svar, or heavenly planets, and all of them knew Bhīṣmadeva as a great warrior and devotee of the Lord. As a mahājana (or authority) he was on the level of Brahmā, Nārada and Śiva, although he was a human being. Qualification on a par with the great demigods is possible only on attainment of spiritual perfection. Thus Bhīṣmadeva was known all over the universes, and during his time interplanetary travel was effected by finer methods than the futile endeavors of mechanical spacecraft. When the distant planets were informed of the passing away of Bhīṣmadeva, all the inhabitants of the upper planets as well as of the earth dropped showers of flowers to show due respect to the departed great personality. This showering of flowers from heaven is a sign of recognition by great demigods, and it should never be compared to the decoration of a dead body. The body of Bhīṣmadeva lost its material effects due to being surcharged with spiritual realization, and thus the body was spiritualized as when iron becomes red-hot when in contact with fire. The body of a fully self-realized soul is not, therefore, accepted as material. Special ceremonies are observed for such spiritual bodies. The respect and recognition of Bhīṣmadeva are never to be imitated by artificial means, as it has become a fashion to observe the so-called jayantī ceremony for any and every common man. According to authorized śāstras, such a jayantī ceremony for an ordinary man, however exalted he may be materially, is an offense to the Lord because jayantī is reserved for the day when the Lord appears on the earth. Bhīṣmadeva was unique in his activities, and his passing away to the kingdom of God is also unique.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Drums played by devatās and men sounded, the kings without hatred praised him, and flowers fell from the sky.
Commentary

Sādahavaḥ rājṣām means “those who were without hatred among the kings.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.46

↗
తస్య నిర్హరణాదీని సమ్పరేతస్య భార్గవ । యుధిష్ఠిర: కారయిత్వా ముహూర్తం దు:ఖితోఽభవత్ ॥ ౪౬ ॥
tasya nirharaṇādīni
[tasya nirharanaadeeni]
samparetasya bhārgava
[samparetasya bhaargava]
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ kārayitvā
[yudhishthirah kaarayitvaa]
muhūrtaṁ duḥkhito ’bhavat
[muhoortam duhkhito ’bhavat]
tasya — his nirharaṇa-ādīni — funeral ceremony samparetasya — of the dead body bhārgava — O descendant of Bhṛgu yudhiṣṭhiraḥ — Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira kārayitvā — having performed it muhūrtam — for a moment duḥkhitaḥ — sorry abhavat — became.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya nirharaṇādīni
tasya
his
nirharaṇa-ādīni
funeral ceremony
samparetasya bhārgava
samparetasya
of the dead body
bhārgava
O descendant of Bhṛgu
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ kārayitvā
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
kārayitvā
having performed it
muhūrtaṁ duḥkhito ’bhavat
muhūrtam
for a moment
duḥkhitaḥ
sorry
abhavat
became.
O descendant of Bhṛgu [Śaunaka], after performing funeral rituals for the dead body of Bhīṣmadeva, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was momentarily overtaken with grief.

Bhīṣmadeva was not only a great family head of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, but also he was a great philosopher and friend to him, his brothers and his mother. Since Mahārāja Pāṇḍu, the father of the five brothers headed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, had died, Bhīṣmadeva was the most affectionate grandfather of the Pāṇḍavas and caretaker of the widow daughter-in-law Kuntīdevī. Although Mahārāja Dhṛtarāṣṭra, the elder uncle of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, was there to look after them, his affection was more on the side of his hundred sons, headed by Duryodhana. Ultimately a colossal clique was fabricated to deprive the five fatherless brothers of the rightful claim of the kingdom of Hastināpura. There was great intrigue, common in imperial palaces, and the five brothers were exiled to the wilderness. But Bhīṣmadeva was always a sincerely sympathetic well-wisher, grandfather, friend and philosopher to Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, even up to the last moment of his life. He died very happily by seeing Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to the throne, otherwise he would have long ago quitted his material body, instead of suffering agony over the undue sufferings of the Pāṇḍavas. He was simply waiting for the opportune moment because he was sure and certain that the sons of Pāṇḍu would come out victorious on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra, as His Lordship Śrī Kṛṣṇa was their protector. As a devotee of the Lord, he knew that the Lord’s devotee cannot be vanquished at any time. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was quite aware of all these good wishes of Bhīṣmadeva, and therefore he must have been feeling the great separation. He was sorry for the separation of a great soul, and not for the material body which Bhīṣmadeva relinquished. The funeral ceremony was a necessary duty, although Bhīṣmadeva was a liberated soul. Since Bhīṣmadeva was without issue, the eldest grandson, namely Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, was the rightful person to perform this ceremony. It was a great boon to Bhīṣmadeva that an equally great son of the family undertook the last rites of a great man.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka of the Bhṛgu dynasty! Yudhiṣṭhira had last rites of the departed Bhīṣma performed and became sad for a moment.
Commentary

Nirharaṇādīni means saṁskāras. Though Bhīṣma is an eternal associate of the Lord, his aṁśa had entered into Vasu (who then descended from the heavenly planets to earth.) Thus Bhīṣma is shown by the Lord to give up his body. His aṁśa was situated in Vasu, and he himself attained the spiritual world. yāvad adhikāram avasthitir ādhikārikāṇām: those designated by the Lord remain in their posts on earth as long as that Lord chooses. (Vedānta-sūtra 3.3.33) Samparetasya can be analyzed as sam for samyak (completely), para for parameśvara (supreme lord) and itasya for prāptasya (obtained). Thus the word means “of the person who attained the Supreme Lord completely.” This is supported by the śruti explaining the details of liberation. Tasya sarveṣu lokeṣu kāma-caṛo bhavati: the liberated soul is free to travel in all the planets as he pleases. (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 7.25.2) It has been said that Bhīṣma, an eternal associate of the Lord, attained Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer in aprakaṭa-līlā. Thus in the previous description of Bhīṣma stopping his breath and giving up his body, one should say that he simply became detached from (upāramat) his manifested body on earth. One should not say that he gave up a material body and gave up breathing. Yudhiṣṭhira was sad for a short period. This he did to follow the custom of the people (since he understood that Bhīṣma did not have a material body).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.47

↗
తుష్టువుర్మునయో హృష్టా: కృష్ణం తద్గుహ్యనామభి: । తతస్తే కృష్ణహృదయా: స్వాశ్రమాన్ ప్రయయు: పున: ॥ ౪౭ ॥
tuṣṭuvur munayo hṛṣṭāḥ
[tushtuvur munayo hrishtaah]
kṛṣṇaṁ tad-guhya-nāmabhiḥ
[krishnam tad-guhya-naamabhih]
tatas te kṛṣṇa-hṛdayāḥ
[tatas te krishna-hridayaah]
svāśramān prayayuḥ punaḥ
[svaashramaan prayayuh punah]
tuṣṭuvuḥ — satisfied munayaḥ — the great sages, headed by Vyāsadeva, etc. hṛṣṭāḥ — all in a happy mood kṛṣṇam — unto Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead tat — His guhya — confidential nāmabhiḥ — by His holy name, etc. tataḥ — thereafter te — they kṛṣṇa-hṛdayāḥ — persons who always bear Lord Kṛṣṇa in their hearts sva-āśramān — to their respective hermitages prayayuḥ — returned punaḥ — again.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tuṣṭuvur munayo hṛṣṭāḥ
tuṣṭuvuḥ
satisfied
munayaḥ
the great sages, headed by Vyāsadeva, etc.
hṛṣṭāḥ
all in a happy mood
kṛṣṇaṁ tad-guhya-nāmabhiḥ
kṛṣṇam
unto Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead
tat
His
guhya
confidential
nāmabhiḥ
by His holy name, etc.
tatas te kṛṣṇa-hṛdayāḥ
tataḥ
thereafter
te
they
kṛṣṇa-hṛdayāḥ
persons who always bear Lord Kṛṣṇa in their hearts
svāśramān prayayuḥ punaḥ
sva-āśramān
to their respective hermitages
prayayuḥ
returned
punaḥ
again.
All the great sages then glorified Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who was present there, by confidential Vedic hymns. Then all of them returned to their respective hermitages, bearing always Lord Kṛṣṇa within their hearts.

The devotees of the Lord are always in the heart of the Lord, and the Lord is always in the hearts of the devotees. That is the sweet relation between the Lord and His devotees. Due to unalloyed love and devotion for the Lord, the devotees always see Him within themselves, and the Lord also, although He has nothing to do and nothing to aspire to, is always busy in attending to the welfare of His devotees. For the ordinary living beings the law of nature is there for all actions and reactions, but He is always anxious to put His devotees on the right path. The devotees, therefore, are under the direct care of the Lord. And the Lord also voluntarily puts Himself under the care of His devotees only. So all the sages, headed by Vyāsadeva, were devotees of the Lord, and therefore they chanted the Vedic hymns after the funeral ceremony just to please the Lord, who was present there personally. All the Vedic hymns are chanted to please Lord Kṛṣṇa. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) . All the Vedas, Upaniṣads, Vedānta, etc., are seeking Him only, and all hymns are for glorifying Him only. The sages, therefore, performed the exact acts suitable for the purpose, and they happily departed for their respective hermitages.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sages in joy praised Kṛṣṇa with his confidential names and then with Kṛṣṇa in their hearts departed again for their hermitages.
Commentary

Tad-guhya-nāmabhiḥ indicates that they said, “O Kṛṣṇa, affectionate to the devotees, controlled by prema! We offer respects to your affection nature.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.48

↗
తతో యుధిష్ఠిరో గత్వా సహకృష్ణో గజాహ్వయమ్ । పితరం సాన్‍త్వయామాస గాన్ధారీం చ తపస్వినీమ్ ॥ ౪౮ ॥
tato yudhiṣṭhiro gatvā
[tato yudhishthiro gatvaa]
saha-kṛṣṇo gajāhvayam
[saha-krishno gajaahvayam]
pitaraṁ sāntvayām āsa
[pitaram saantvayaam aasa]
gāndhārīṁ ca tapasvinīm
[gaandhaareem cha tapasvineem]
tataḥ — thereafter yudhiṣṭhiraḥ — Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira gatvā — going there saha — with kṛṣṇaḥ — the Lord gajāhvayam — in the capital named Gajāhvaya Hastināpura pitaram — unto his uncle (Dhṛtarāṣṭra) sāntvayām āsa — consoled gāndhārīm — the wife of Dhṛtarāṣṭra ca — and tapasvinīm — an ascetic lady.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato yudhiṣṭhiro gatvā
tataḥ
thereafter
yudhiṣṭhiraḥ
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
gatvā
going there
saha-kṛṣṇo gajāhvayam
saha
with
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Lord
gajāhvayam
in the capital named Gajāhvaya Hastināpura
pitaraṁ sāntvayām āsa
pitaram
unto his uncle (Dhṛtarāṣṭra)
sāntvayām āsa
consoled
gāndhārīṁ ca tapasvinīm
gāndhārīm
the wife of Dhṛtarāṣṭra
ca
and
tapasvinīm
an ascetic lady.
Thereafter, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira at once went to his capital, Hastināpura, accompanied by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and there he consoled his uncle and aunt Gāndhārī, who was an ascetic.

Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Gāndhārī, the father and the mother of Duryodhana and his brothers, were the elder uncle and aunt of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. After the Battle of Kurukṣetra, the celebrated couple, having lost all their sons and grandsons, were under the care of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. They were passing their days in great agony over such a heavy loss of life and were practically living the life of ascetics. The death news of Bhīṣmadeva, uncle of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, was another great shock for the King and the Queen, and therefore they required solace from Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was conscious of his duty, and he at once hurried to the spot with Lord Kṛṣṇa and satisfied the bereaved Dhṛtarāṣṭra with kind words, from both himself and the Lord also.

Gāndhārī was a powerful ascetic, although she was living the life of a faithful wife and a kind mother. It is said that Gāndhārī also voluntarily blindfolded her eyes because of the blindness of her husband. A wife’s duty is to follow the husband cent-percent. And Gāndhārī was so true to her husband that she followed him even in his perpetual blindness. Therefore in her actions she was a great ascetic. Besides that, the shock she suffered because of the wholesale killing of her one hundred sons and her grandsons also was certainly too much for a woman. But she suffered all this just like an ascetic. Gāndhārī, although a woman, is no less than Bhīṣmadeva in character. They are both remarkable personalities in the Mahābhārata.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then Yudhiṣṭhira went to Hastināpura with Kṛṣṇa and consoled Dhṛtarāṣtṛa and Gāndhārī, who was overcome with grief.
Commentary

Pitaram means Dhṛtarāṣtṛa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.49

↗
పిత్రా చానుమతో రాజా వాసుదేవానుమోదిత: । చకార రాజ్యం ధర్మేణ పితృపైతామహం విభు: ॥ ౪౯ ॥
pitrā cānumato rājā
[pitraa chaanumato raajaa]
vāsudevānumoditaḥ
[vaasudevaanumoditah]
cakāra rājyaṁ dharmeṇa
[chakaara raajyam dharmena]
pitṛ-paitāmahaṁ vibhuḥ
[pitri-paitaamaham vibhuh]
pitrā — by his uncle, Dhṛtarāṣṭra ca — and anumataḥ — with his approval rājā — King Yudhiṣṭhira vāsudeva-anumoditaḥ — confirmed by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa cakāra — executed rājyam — the kingdom dharmeṇa — in compliance with the codes of royal principles pitṛ — father paitāmaham — forefather vibhuḥ — as great as.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pitrā cānumato rājā
pitrā
by his uncle, Dhṛtarāṣṭra
ca
and
anumataḥ
with his approval
rājā
King Yudhiṣṭhira
vāsudevānumoditaḥ
vāsudeva-anumoditaḥ
confirmed by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
cakāra rājyaṁ dharmeṇa
cakāra
executed
rājyam
the kingdom
dharmeṇa
in compliance with the codes of royal principles
pitṛ-paitāmahaṁ vibhuḥ
pitṛ
father
paitāmaham
forefather
vibhuḥ
as great as.
After this, the great religious King, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, executed the royal power in the kingdom strictly according to the codes of royal principles approved by his uncle and confirmed by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was not a mere tax collector. He was always conscious of his duty as a king, which is no less than that of a father or spiritual master. The king is to see to the welfare of the citizens from all angles of social, political, economic and spiritual upliftment. The king must know that human life is meant for liberating the encaged soul from the bondage of material conditions, and therefore his duty is to see that the citizens are properly looked after to attain this highest stage of perfection.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira followed these principles strictly, as will be seen from the next chapter. Not only did he follow the principles, but he also got approval from his old uncle, who was experienced in political affairs, and that was also confirmed by Lord Kṛṣṇa, the speaker of the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira is the ideal monarch, and monarchy under a trained king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira is by far the most superior form of government, superior to modern republics or governments of the people, by the people. The mass of people, especially in this Age of Kali, are all born śūdras, basically lowborn, ill-trained, unfortunate and badly associated. They themselves do not know the highest perfectional aim of life. Therefore, votes cast by them actually have no value, and thus persons elected by such irresponsible votes cannot be responsible representatives like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Ninth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Passing Away of Bhīṣmadeva in the Presence of Lord Kṛṣṇa.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With the permission of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, and agreement of Kṛṣṇa, powerful Yudhiṣṭhira ruled the ancestral kingdom according to dharma. śrī-kṛṣṇa-dvārakā-gamanaṁ nāma Kṛṣṇa goes to Dvārakā
📝 My note