Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.42
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the one Absolute Supreme Personality of Godhead, but He has expanded Himself into His multiplenary portions by His inconceivable energy. The conception of duality is due to ignorance of His inconceivable energy. In the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) the Lord says that only the foolish take Him to be a mere human being. Such foolish men are not aware of His inconceivable energies. By His inconceivable energy He is present in everyone’s heart, as the sun is present before everyone all over the world. The Paramātmā feature of the Lord is an expansion of His plenary portions. He expands Himself as Paramātmā in everyone’s heart by His inconceivable energy, and He also expands Himself as the glowing effulgence of brahmajyoti by expansion of His personal glow. It is stated in the Brahma-saṁhitā that the brahmajyoti is His personal glow. Therefore, there is no difference between Him and His personal glow, brahmajyoti, or His plenary portions as Paramātmā. Less intelligent persons who are not aware of this fact consider brahmajyoti and Paramātmā to be different from Śrī Kṛṣṇa. This misconception of duality is completely removed from the mind of Bhīṣmadeva, and he is now satisfied that it is Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa only who is all in all in everything. This enlightenment is attained by the great mahātmās or devotees, as it is stated in Bhagavad-gītā (7.19) that Vāsudeva is all in all in everything and that there is no existence of anything without Vāsudeva. Vāsudeva, or Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is the original Supreme Person, as now confirmed by a mahājana, and therefore both the neophytes and the pure devotees must try to follow in his footsteps. That is the way of the devotional line.
The worshipable object of Bhīṣmadeva is Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa as Pārtha-sārathi, and that of the gopīs is the same Kṛṣṇa in Vṛndāvana as the most attractive Śyāmasundara. Sometimes less intelligent scholars make a mistake and think that the Kṛṣṇa of Vṛndāvana and that of the Battle of Kurukṣetra are different personalities. But for Bhīṣmadeva this misconception is completely removed. Even the impersonalist’s object of destination is Kṛṣṇa as the impersonal jyoti, and the yogī’s destination of Paramātmā is also Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa is both brahmajyoti and localized Paramātmā, but in brahmajyoti or Paramātmā there is no Kṛṣṇa or sweet relations with Kṛṣṇa. In His personal feature Kṛṣṇa is both Pārtha-sārathi and Śyāmasundara of Vṛndāvana, but in His impersonal feature He is neither in the brahmajyoti nor in the Paramātmā. Great mahātmās like Bhīṣmadeva realize all these different features of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and therefore they worship Lord Kṛṣṇa, knowing Him as the origin of all features.
Why do you not address the Lord directly but instead address him indirectly with word like vijaya-sakhe vijaya-ratha-kuṭumba me ratir astu and caraṇa-ratiḥ paramasya tasya me ’stu and sa bhavatu me bhagavān gatir.” This verse answers, indicating that Bhīiṣma desires the Lord as a charioteer.
I have attained that Lord (tam) who is the charioteer of Arjuna, holding the whip and bridle in his hands, who is now appearing in my heart (imam). But the charioteer is not the Lord in the heart. Because Kṛṣṇa the charioteer has already entered and pervaded my heart completely by practice, it is not possible for the paramātmā to enter. He does not make his appearance just at this time (ajam). Though he appeared to my eyes in this form at the time of battle, even before the battle he was already in my heart because of my spontaneous desire. He is unborn because he has always been visible to me. There is no fault on my part in this, but the Supreme Lord alone situated in the heart ordains good fortunate or misfortune of the jīvas. He is situated (dhiṣṭhitam) in the hearts of all jīvas (śarīra-bhājām), who create their own bodies. The missing “a” in (dhiṣṭhitam) is for meter. The śruti says yathāgneḥ kṣudrā visphuliṅga vyuccaranti; the souls wander around like small sparks. (Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 2.1.20)
I know that the charioteer indicated by the word tam and the four-handed form in Dvārakā indicated by the word imam are not different. The one sun in the sky appears to individual seers to be not one but many, above each person’s head. By such distinctive seeing the sun appears to be many. Bhīṣma is free of such illusionary seeing (vidhūta-bheda-moha). Though Kṛṣṇa appears in my heart, and in the hearts of Yudhiṣṭhira, Vasudeva, Uddhava, Nanda and the gopīs with various degrees of prema and type of love, with different pastimes for each, I know that this is one Kṛṣṇa only. I know the various degrees of excellence of their prema and love. But I can never give up my natural attachment to the form of Kṛṣṇa as the charioteer. Even thinking of the four-handed form of Kṛṣṇa in Dvārakā is not interesting to me.
- Priya Valabha Mataji SB 01-09-42-43 Hindi
- UM SB 01-09-42 - Samadhi above Duality - 2011-05-18 ISKCON Hawaii
- Vaisesika Pr SB 01-09-42 - 2009-01-24
- Hari Vilas Sw SB 01-09-42 - 2020-02-08
- PrahladAnS SB 01-09-42 Slovenian Translation - Vzamite zavetje duhovne energije - 2025-09-07 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS SB 01-09-42 - Take shelter of spiritual energy - 2025-09-07 ISKCON Slovenia
- HG Urmila Mataji - SB 01-09-42 - 2011-05-18 ISKCON Hawaii
My note
Source: vedabase.io