FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

3.22 · The Marriage of Kardama Muni and Devahūti

37 verses
E Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16599 chars)

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Prajapatis, or progenitors of mankind, are lent the task of procreating and expanding the number of living entities within the universe. Kardama Muni was one such prajapati. He married Devahuti, the daughter of Svayambhuva Manu, and together they had nine daughters and one son (Lord Kapiladeva). The nine daughters were married to various sages and their subsequent union caused further expansion of entities within the universe. The son, Lord Kapiladeva, presented profound philosophical truths to remind the entities what they are meant to achieve in the universe.

Previous Divine Play Next Different Entities Created Last updated 1 year ago

E - Expanding Entities (20-24)

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Prajapatis, or progenitors of mankind, are lent the task of procreating and expanding the number of living entities within the universe. Kardama Muni was one such prajapati. He married Devahuti, the daughter of Svayambhuva Manu, and together they had nine daughters and one son (Lord Kapiladeva). The nine daughters were married to various sages and their subsequent union caused further expansion of entities within the universe. The son, Lord Kapiladeva, presented profound philosophical truths to remind the entities what they are meant to achieve in the universe.

Previous Divine Play Next Different Entities Created Last updated 1 year ago

Devahuti and Kardama Muni

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Devahuti and Kardama Muni Chapter 21, 22 Vidura enquired about the dynasty of Svayambhuva Manu, whose progeny multiplied and expanded the entities within the universe. Svayambhuva Manu had two sons (Priyavrata and Uttanapada) and three daughters (Akuti, Devahuti, Prasuti). Maitreya Rishi began by describing the life of Devahuti. When Kardama Muni was ordered by Brahma to beget children, he performed 10,000 years of penance, preparing himself for successful execution of this important task, which would begin with finding a suitable wife. Pleased by the sage’s endeavours, the Lord confirmed that Svayambhuva Manu and Satarupa would offer their daughter, Devahuti, in marriage. Kardama Muni and Devahuti would then have nine daughters, after which the Lord would personally appear as her son and impart jewel-like instructions in devotional service. The events began to transpire as predicted. When Svayambhuva Manu and his wife reached his hermitage, Kardama heartily welcomed them. They expressed great respect and appreciation for each other, demonstrating the respectful culture of Varnasrama. Svayambhuva Manu described his daughter’s attraction to the sage and offered her hand in marriage. Kardama Muni glorified Devahuti’s good qualities and agreed to the marriage proposal on the condition that after bearing a child in her womb, he be permitted to renounce family life. The settlement was made, and the marriage thus took place.

Previous Different Entities Created Next Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Last updated 1 year ago

Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Chapter 23, 24 After marriage, Devahuti served her husband very faithfully, undergoing such severe austerities that she became weak and emaciated. Seeing her remarkable chastity and devotion, Kardama Muni prepared for their union as per her desire. By dint of his yogic power, he arranged an incredible aerial mansion, unparalleled opulence, and complete restoration of Devahuti’s body. They enjoyed celestial pleasures for many years, though the sage remained completely detached. Kardama Muni then divided himself into nine forms and begot nine children in Devahuti. Being overly excited, she gave birth to nine females. As her husband prepared to leave home, Devahuti felt pained. Her first lamentation was that she hadn’t taken spiritual advantage of the sage’s association, and furthermore she desired a son who would protect her. Kardama Muni reassuringly explained that the Supreme Lord would soon enter her womb. In the future, that son would bless her with enlightening wisdom. After many years, a multitude of auspicious signs confirmed that the Supreme Lord, Kapila Muni, had indeed appeared in Devahuti’s womb. After His appearance, Brahma immediately came there to worship the Lord. The universal engineer praised Kardama Muni’s unflinching adherence to his instructions, and guided the sage to offer his nine daughters to the nine principle sages. Brahma also predicted that Kapila Muni would impart invaluable instructions in detachment, devotion, and sankhya philosophy. After Brahma left, Kardama Muni discreetly approached his son and offered prayers of surrender. He requested permission to renounce family life and live as a mendicant. After receiving the go-ahead, Kardama Muni entered the forest, fixed his mind on the Supreme Lord, and thus went back to Godhead.

Previous Devahuti and Kardama Muni Next The Life Cycle Last updated 1 year ago

Different Entities Created

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Different Entities Created Chapter 20 With the earth safely back in orbit, the next step was to populate it with creatures. After briefly recapping the primary creation, Maitreya explained the steps of secondary creation by Lord Brahma, who appeared from the navel of Garbhodakasayi Vishnu. Inspired by the Lord, Brahma began the intricate process of engineering the universe. The creations included: • Five coverings of ignorance – anger, considering death to be the end, ignorance of the spirit soul, the bodily concept of life, and greed for material enjoyment • Yaksas and Raksasas (who desired to devour their creator but were unsuccessful) • Demigods, demons, ghosts, Apsaras and Gandharvas • Sadhyas, Pitas, Siddhas, Vidyadharas, Kinnaras and Kimpurusas • Snakes, serpents and nagas • Manus and the sages

Previous E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Next Devahuti and Kardama Muni Last updated 1 year ago

The Life Cycle

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle “Kardama Muni practised yoga very rigidly as a brahmacari before his marriage, and he became so powerful and attained so much mystic power that his father, Brahma, ordered him to marry and beget children as a householder. Kardama did that also; he begot nine good daughters and one son, Kapila Muni, and thus his householder duty was also performed nicely, and now his duty was to leave. Even though he had the Supreme Personality of Godhead as his son, he had to respect the authority of the Vedas. This is a very important lesson. Even if one has God in his home as his son, one should still follow the Vedic injunctions.” (SB 3.24.35)

Previous Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Next Orders of Life Last updated 1 year ago

Occupations in Life

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Occupations in Life The Vedic social system also provides a way for each person to engage their psycho-physical nature in suitable work for individual growth and social stability. The four broad divisions are: Brahmanas (Teachers) – those who are drawn towards education, teaching and providing spiritual guidance. Their qualities: “Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, knowledge, wisdom and religiousness.” (BG 18.42) Ksatriyas (Administrators) – those who have capacity for managing, organising and ensuring upkeep of society. Their qualities: “Heroism, power, determination, resourcefulness, courage in battle, generosity and leadership.” (BG 18.43) Vaisyas (Merchants) – those who are suited for business, entrepreneurial pursuits and providing resources for society. Their qualities: “Farming, cow protection and business.” (BG 18.44) Sudras (Labourers) –those who happily serve the other three classes and provide support for the entire social system on the ground. Their qualities: “labour and service to others.” (BG 18.44) If we look at society as a body, then the sudras are the legs, the vaisyas are the stomach, the ksatriyas are the arms, and the brahmanas are the head. Each one is critically vital and equally important. Srila Prabhupada explains how cooperation between the varnas is beneficial for one and all: “The entire social structure of varna and asrama is a cooperative system meant to uplift all to the highest platform of spiritual realisation. The brahmanas are intended to be protected by the ksatriyas , and the ksatriyas also are intended to be enlightened by the brahmanas . When the brahmanas and ksatriyas cooperate nicely, the other subordinate divisions, the vaisyas , or mercantile people, and the sudras , or labourer class, automatically flourish.” (SB 3.22.4)

Previous Orders of Life Next Varieties of Varnasrama Last updated 1 year ago

Orders of Life

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Orders of Life In Sanskrit, the word asrama denotes a place of spiritual culture; typically, the residence or monastery where a guru instructs and enlightens his disciples. In a more general sense, however, asrama refers to the spiritual ‘orders of life.’ According to the Vedic model, the life cycle of every individual progresses through four asramas , or stages for spiritual development - student life ( brahmacarya ), married life ( grhastha ), retired life ( vanaprastha ), and renounced life ( sannyasa ). Each stage facilitates a unique aspect of internal development and prepares one for spiritual perfection at the final hour. Learn (brahmacarya-asrama) – in student life, one observes a vow of celibacy and receives training in self-realisation from a spiritual master. His education centres around scriptural knowledge, character development and practical skills. Whether he goes on to marry and eventually retire from family life, or whether he goes directly to the renounced order of sannyasa , the practice of brahmacarya is the indispensable foundation of success. Earn (grhasta-asrama) – in the second stage of life, typically from 25 years to 50 years, the individual will marry and raise a family. By engaging in suitable work, they earn their living in the world, and with those earnings support their family and the other three social orders. Though there is more freedom in this stage of life, the householder still lives by strict principles and honours boundaries of sexual restraint. Dutifulness and selflessness are essential qualities developed in the family context. Turn (vanaprastha-asrama) – when householders reach the age of fifty, they should ideally detach themselves from the complex network of family setup and resume a life of spiritual austerity, handing over the worldly responsibilities to the grown-up children. In this retired stage of life, a man and his wife may travel to holy places of pilgrimage and turn the focus of their lives from material responsibilities to spiritual absorption. Return (sannyasa-asrama) – in the final stage of life, the wife re-enters the family and matures to full spiritual perfection, while the husband embraces complete renunciation and dedicates himself to achieving perfect realisation and imparting spiritual understanding to the other three asramas . Thus, for the husband and wife, all other concerns are practically eliminated, and their entire attention is fully focused on returning to the spiritual world. Through this scientific setup, the Vedic culture ensures that every stage of life has meaning and value for the attainment of spiritual enlightenment. Early in his life, Kardama Muni performed many years of austerity in preparation for his forthcoming family life. Later he married Devahuti, and due to their spotless character and pure desire, the Supreme Lord agreed to become their son. Though he had God as his son, Kardama Muni still left his family life, strictly honouring the injunction that one must spend his final days away from home in the mood of renunciation. Kapiladeva encouraged His father not to deviate from the scriptures, and He assured him that as the Supreme Lord He would always be with His father, residing in his heart. Thus, Kardama Muni left his wife and son, and became a wandering sannyasi , totally dependent on Krishna for his necessities in life. Thus, in Kardama Muni we see an ideal example of how the Vedic life cycle leads to perfection. In modern society one may not be able to follow this model exactly as prescribed. That said, the principles of each asrama should be embraced, and one should make an endeavour to invest time and energy in cultivating those qualities in an appropriate way. For example, one may not have the privilege of spending the first 25 years of their life as a brahmacari , but the key principle to embrace is learning and spiritual self-development. Thus, before one gets married, one should spend quality time educating themselves and becoming trained in spiritual culture. When and how to do this is a detail which needs to be worked out individually. Similarly, older couples may not be able to leave home completely and embrace the forest life of vanaprasthas , but the principle is to turn their emphasis towards spiritual cultivation and significantly reduce their material encumbrance. An appropriate and achievable way to do this can be arranged amidst the modern pressures surrounding us.

Previous The Life Cycle Next Occupations in Life Last updated 1 year ago

Varieties of Varnasrama

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Varieties of Varnasrama Original Varnasrama (authentic spiritual society) – this system provides for material well-being and simultaneously cultures spiritual elevation. It is, in essence, a social structure based on spiritual principles of equality, respect and selfless service to one another and God. People are placed according to qualities ( guna ) and work ( karma ), actively connecting their daily activities to a transcendental goal. The most revered members in this system are those who have fully developed their spiritual consciousness, and this is possible for everyone. This system is known as daivi (divine) Varnasrama. Materialistic Varnasrama (modern-day hereditary caste system) – this system, prevalent in modern-day India, provides material well-being for select groups, and is founded upon misconceptions and deviations of the original Vedic system. One’s birth ( janma ) is taken as the only qualification for stratification, and the problem of caste brahminism thus arises, where the heads of society are often unqualified, deviant and exploitative. Although there are some authentic elements of Vedic culture in it, for the most part the members engage in materialistic religiosity for mundane gains. Spontaneous Varnasrama (‘default’ materialistic society) – this system indicates the natural division created by societies which is primarily driven by economic factors, and not founded upon any spiritual teaching whatsoever. Though people talk of a classless society, there will be unavoidable division within any community. Without it, there can be no order or efficiency. When such division takes place without spiritual supervision, we witness exploitation, corruption, conflict, huge income gaps, and a general breakdown of society due to sinful activities ( vikarma ). This type of social structure distances people from their spiritual essence. [ 13 ] Society will always divide itself into categories – each one of us have different skills and strengths, and society needs each member to engage that uniqueness so we function efficiently as one unit. Unfortunately, the exploitation of such stratification has fuelled the artificial attempt of modern culture to annihilate all division. The real need is to re-establish the original system of appropriate division founded upon spiritual principles and respect. Srila Prabhupada writes: “The divisions of varnas and asramas will continue to exist, either in their original form or in degraded form, but because they are created by the Lord, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, they cannot be extinguished. They are like the sun, a creation of God, and therefore will remain. Either covered by clouds or in a clear sky, the sun will continue to exist. Similarly, when the varnasrama system becomes degraded, it appears as a hereditary caste system, but in every society there is an intelligent class of men, a martial class, a mercantile class and a labourer class. When they are regulated for cooperation among communities according to the the Vedic principles, then there is peace and spiritual advancement.” (SB 3.21.54)

Previous Occupations in Life Next S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.1

↗
మైత్రేయ ఉవాచ ఏవమావిష్కృతాశేషగుణకర్మోదయో మునిమ్ । సవ్రీడ ఇవ తం సమ్రాడుపారతమువాచ హ ॥ ౧ ॥
maitreya uvāca
[maitreya uvaacha]
evam āviṣkṛtāśeṣa-
[evam aavishkritaashesha-]
guṇa-karmodayo munim
[guna-karmodayo munim]
savrīḍa iva taṁ samrāḍ
[savreeda iva tam samraad]
upāratam uvāca ha
[upaaratam uvaacha ha]
maitreyaḥ — the great sage Maitreya uvāca — said evam — thus āviṣkṛta — having been described aśeṣa — all guṇa — of the virtues karma — of the activities udayaḥ — the greatness munim — the great sage sa-vrīḍaḥ — feeling modest iva — as though tam — him (Kardama) samrāṭ — Emperor Manu upāratam — silent uvāca ha — addressed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maitreya uvāca
maitreyaḥ
the great sage Maitreya
uvāca
said
evam āviṣkṛtāśeṣa-
evam
thus
āviṣkṛta
having been described
aśeṣa
all
guṇa-karmodayo munim
guṇa
of the virtues
karma
of the activities
udayaḥ
the greatness
munim
the great sage
savrīḍa iva taṁ samrāḍ
sa-vrīḍaḥ
feeling modest
iva
as though
tam
him (Kardama)
samrāṭ
Emperor Manu
upāratam uvāca ha
upāratam
silent
uvāca ha
addressed.
Śrī Maitreya said: After describing the greatness of the Emperor’s manifold qualities and activities, the sage became silent, and the Emperor, feeling modesty, addressed him as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Maitreya said: The King, whose unlimited excellent actions and qualities had been described, became embarrassed, and then spoke to the silent sage. The Twenty-second Chapter describes how the King, after speaking in a pleasing manner and giving his daughter to Kardama, knower of truth, returns to his kingdom. The excellence of King’s unlimited qualities and activities had been described. He spoke to the sage who became silent, or who was detached from everything (upāratam). He was embarrassed because of hearing his own glories and because of the descriptions of his occupation, when he himself was completely dedicated to the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.2

↗
మనురువాచ బ్రహ్మాసృజత్స్వముఖతో యుష్మానాత్మపరీప్సయా । ఛన్దోమయస్తపోవిద్యాయోగయుక్తానలమ్పటాన్ ॥ ౨ ॥
manur uvāca
[manur uvaacha]
brahmāsṛjat sva-mukhato
[brahmaasrijat sva-mukhato]
yuṣmān ātma-parīpsayā
[yushmaan aatma-pareepsayaa]
chandomayas tapo-vidyā-
[chandomayas tapo-vidyaa-]
yoga-yuktān alampaṭān
[yoga-yuktaan alampataan]
manuḥ — Manu uvāca — said brahmā — Lord Brahmā asṛjat — created sva-mukhataḥ — from his face yuṣmān — you (brāhmaṇas) ātma-parīpsayā — to protect himself by expanding chandaḥ-mayaḥ — the form of the Vedas tapaḥ-vidyā-yoga-yuktān — full of austerity, knowledge and mystic power alampaṭān — averse to sense gratification.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
manur uvāca
manuḥ
Manu
uvāca
said
brahmāsṛjat sva-mukhato
brahmā
Lord Brahmā
asṛjat
created
sva-mukhataḥ
from his face
yuṣmān ātma-parīpsayā
yuṣmān
you (brāhmaṇas)
ātma-parīpsayā
to protect himself by expanding
chandomayas tapo-vidyā-
chandaḥ-mayaḥ
the form of the Vedas
tapaḥ-vidyā-yoga-yuktān
full of austerity, knowledge and mystic power
yoga-yuktān alampaṭān
alampaṭān
averse to sense gratification.
Manu replied: To expand himself in Vedic knowledge, Lord Brahmā, the personified Veda, from his face created you, the brāhmaṇas, who are full of austerity, knowledge and mystic power and are averse to sense gratification.

The purpose of the Vedas is to propagate the transcendental knowledge of the Absolute Truth. The brāhmaṇas were created from the mouth of the Supreme Person, and therefore they are meant to spread the knowledge of the Vedas in order to spread the glories of the Lord. In Bhagavad-gītā also Lord Kṛṣṇa says that all the Vedas are meant for understanding the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is especially mentioned here ( yoga-yuktān alampaṭān ) that brāhmaṇas are full of mystic power and are completely averse to sense gratification. Actually there are two kinds of occupations. One occupation, in the material world, is sense gratification, and the other occupation is spiritual activity — to satisfy the Lord by His glorification. Those who engage in sense gratification are called demons, and those who spread the glorification of the Lord or satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord are called demigods. It is specifically mentioned here that the brāhmaṇas are created from the face of the cosmic personality, or virāṭ-puruṣa. Similarly, the kṣatriyas are said to be created from His arms, the vaiśyas are created from His waist, and the śūdras are created from His legs. Brāhmaṇas are especially meant for austerity, learning and knowledge and are averse to all kinds of sense gratification.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Manu said: Desiring to propagate the Vedas Brahmā, the form of the Vedas, created you, the brāhmaṇas, endowed with austerity, knowledge and yoga, from his face Fearing the sage would refuse his daughter in marriage, Manu first explained with reasoning the relationship between the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas in two and a half verses. Brahmā created the brāhmaṇas with a desire to preserve the Vedas by propagating them (ātma-parīpsayā).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.3

↗
తత్‍త్రాణాయాసృజచ్చాస్మాన్ దో:సహస్రాత్సహస్రపాత్ । హృదయం తస్య హి బ్రహ్మ క్షత్రమఙ్గం ప్రచక్షతే ॥ ౩ ॥
tat-trāṇāyāsṛjac cāsmān
[tat-traanaayaasrijach chaasmaan]
doḥ-sahasrāt sahasra-pāt
[doh-sahasraat sahasra-paat]
hṛdayaṁ tasya hi brahma
[hridayam tasya hi brahma]
kṣatram aṅgaṁ pracakṣate
[kshatram angam prachakshate]
tat-trāṇāya — for the protection of the brāhmaṇas asṛjat — created ca — and asmān — us (kṣatriyas) doḥ-sahasrāt — from His thousand arms sahasra-pāt — the thousand-legged Supreme Being (the universal form) hṛdayam — heart tasya — His hi — for brahma — brāhmaṇas kṣatram — the kṣatriyas aṅgam — arms pracakṣate — are spoken of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-trāṇāyāsṛjac cāsmān
tat-trāṇāya
for the protection of the brāhmaṇas
asṛjat
created
ca
and
asmān
us (kṣatriyas)
doḥ-sahasrāt sahasra-pāt
doḥ-sahasrāt
from His thousand arms
sahasra-pāt
the thousand-legged Supreme Being (the universal form)
hṛdayaṁ tasya hi brahma
hṛdayam
heart
tasya
His
hi
for
brahma
brāhmaṇas
kṣatram aṅgaṁ pracakṣate
kṣatram
the kṣatriyas
aṅgam
arms
pracakṣate
are spoken of.
For the protection of the brāhmaṇas, the thousand-legged Supreme Being created us, the kṣatriyas, from His thousand arms. Hence the brāhmaṇas are said to be His heart and the kṣatriyas His arms.

Kṣatriyas are specifically meant to maintain the brāhmaṇas because if the brāhmaṇas are protected, then the head of civilization is protected. Brāhmaṇas are supposed to be the head of the social body; if the head is clear and has not gone mad, then everything is in proper position. The Lord is described thus: namo brahmaṇya-devāya go-brāhmaṇa-hitāya ca. The purport of this prayer is that the Lord specifically protects the brāhmaṇas and the cows, and then He protects all other members of society ( jagad-dhitāya ). It is His will that universal welfare work depends on the protection of cows and brāhmaṇas; thus brahminical culture and cow protection are the basic principles for human civilization. Kṣatriyas are especially meant to protect the brāhmaṇas, as is the supreme will of the Lord: go-brāhmaṇa-hitāya ca. As the heart is a very important part within the body, so the brāhmaṇas are also the important element in human society. The kṣatriyas are more like the whole body; even though the whole body is bigger than the heart, the heart is more important.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The thousand-footed Lord has created us, the kṣatriyas from his thousand arm for protection of the brāhmaṇas. The bṛahmaṇas are called the heart and the kṣatriyas are the arms. Who will protect the brāhmaṇas? From his thousand arms he created the kṣatriyas. Thus they are one with the Lord. Who will protect the kṣatriyas? The brāhmaṇas (brahma) will do this. When someone comes to attack the heart, the heart is seen to be protected by the arms. When the arms are attacked, one contracts the body and the arms are protected within the heart. Thus the protector of the heart is the arm and the protector of the arm is the heart.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.4

↗
అతో హ్యన్యోన్యమాత్మానం బ్రహ్మ క్షత్రం చ రక్షత: । రక్షతి స్మావ్యయో దేవ: స య: సదసదాత్మక: ॥ ౪ ॥
ato hy anyonyam ātmānaṁ
[ato hy anyonyam aatmaanam]
brahma kṣatraṁ ca rakṣataḥ
[brahma kshatram cha rakshatah]
rakṣati smāvyayo devaḥ
[rakshati smaavyayo devah]
sa yaḥ sad-asad-ātmakaḥ
[sa yah sad-asad-aatmakah]
ataḥ — hence hi — certainly anyonyam — each other ātmānam — the self brahma — the brāhmaṇas kṣatram — the kṣatriyas ca — and rakṣataḥ — protect rakṣati sma — protects avyayaḥ — immutable devaḥ — the Lord saḥ — He yaḥ — who sat-asat-ātmakaḥ — the form of the cause and effect.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ato hy anyonyam ātmānaṁ
ataḥ
hence
hi
certainly
anyonyam
each other
ātmānam
the self
brahma kṣatraṁ ca rakṣataḥ
brahma
the brāhmaṇas
kṣatram
the kṣatriyas
ca
and
rakṣataḥ
protect
rakṣati smāvyayo devaḥ
rakṣati sma
protects
avyayaḥ
immutable
devaḥ
the Lord
sa yaḥ sad-asad-ātmakaḥ
saḥ
He
yaḥ
who
sat-asat-ātmakaḥ
the form of the cause and effect.
That is why the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas protect each other, as well as themselves; and the Lord Himself, who is both the cause and effect and is yet immutable, protects them through each other.

The entire social structure of varṇa and āśrama is a cooperative system meant to uplift all to the highest platform of spiritual realization. The brāhmaṇas are intended to be protected by the kṣatriyas, and the kṣatriyas also are intended to be enlightened by the brāhmaṇas. When the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas cooperate nicely, the other subordinate divisions, the vaiśyas, or mercantile people, and the śūdras, or laborer class, automatically flourish. The entire elaborate system of Vedic society was therefore based on the importance of the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas. The Lord is the real protector, but He is unattached to the affairs of protection. He creates brāhmaṇas for the protection of the kṣatriyas, and kṣatriyas for the protection of the brāhmaṇas. He remains aloof from all activities; therefore, He is called nirvikāra, “without activity.” He has nothing to do. He is so great that He does not perform action personally, but His energies act. The brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas, and anything that we see, are different energies acting upon one another.

Although individual souls are all different, the Superself, or Supersoul, is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Individually one’s self may differ from others in certain qualities and may engage in different activities, such as those of a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya or vaiśya, but when there is complete cooperation among different individual souls, the Supreme Personality of Godhead as Supersoul, Paramātmā, being one in every individual soul, is pleased and gives them all protection. As stated before, the brāhmaṇas are produced from the mouth of the Lord, and the kṣatriyas are produced from the chest or arms of the Lord. If the different castes or social sections, although apparently differently occupied in different activities, nevertheless act in full cooperation, then the Lord is pleased. This is the idea of the institution of four varṇas and four āśramas. If the members of different āśramas and varṇas cooperate fully in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then society is well protected by the Lord, without doubt.

In Bhagavad-gītā it is stated that the Lord is the proprietor of all different bodies. The individual soul is the proprietor of his individual body, but the Lord clearly states, “My dear Bhārata, you must know that I am also kṣetra-jṣa. ” Kṣetra-jṣa means “the knower or proprietor of the body.” The individual soul is the proprietor of the individual body, but the Supersoul, the Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, is the proprietor of all bodies everywhere. He is the proprietor not only of human bodies but of birds, beasts and all other entities, not only on this planet but on other planets also. He is the supreme proprietor; therefore He does not become divided by protecting the different individual souls. He remains one and the same. That the sun appears on top of everyone’s head when at the meridian does not imply that the sun becomes divided. One man thinks that the sun is on his head only, whereas five thousand miles away another man is thinking that the sun is only on his head. Similarly, the Supersoul, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is one, but He appears to individually oversee each individual soul. This does not mean that the individual soul and the Supersoul are one. They are one in quality, as spirit soul, but the individual soul and Supersoul are different.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus, the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas protect each other. But the unchanging Supreme Lord, who is cause and effect, protects them both. The brāhmaṇa protects the kṣatriya by the strength of his austerity. The kṣatriya protects the brāhmaṇa by the strength of his body. Actually, however, the Supreme Lord, who is cause and effect, who is without change (avyayaḥ), protects both.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.5

↗
తవ సన్దర్శనాదేవచ్ఛిన్నా మే సర్వసంశయా: । యత్స్వయం భగవాన్ ప్రీత్యా ధర్మమాహ రిరక్షిషో: ॥ ౫ ॥
tava sandarśanād eva
[tava sandarshanaad eva]
cchinnā me sarva-saṁśayāḥ
[chchinnaa me sarva-samshayaah]
yat svayaṁ bhagavān prītyā
[yat svayam bhagavaan preetyaa]
dharmam āha rirakṣiṣoḥ
[dharmam aaha rirakshishoh]
tava — your sandarśanāt — by sight eva — only chinnāḥ — resolved me — my sarva-saṁśayāḥ — all doubts yat — inasmuch as svayam — personally bhagavān — Your Lordship prītyā — lovingly dharmam — duty āha — explained rirakṣiṣoḥ — of a king anxious to protect his subjects.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tava sandarśanād eva
tava
your
sandarśanāt
by sight
eva
only
cchinnā me sarva-saṁśayāḥ
chinnāḥ
resolved
me
my
sarva-saṁśayāḥ
all doubts
yat
inasmuch as
yat svayaṁ bhagavān prītyā
svayam
personally
bhagavān
Your Lordship
prītyā
lovingly
dharmam āha rirakṣiṣoḥ
dharmam
duty
āha
explained
rirakṣiṣoḥ
of a king anxious to protect his subjects.
Now I have resolved all my doubts simply by meeting you, for Your Lordship has very kindly and clearly explained the duty of a king who desires to protect his subjects.

Manu described herewith the result of seeing a great saintly person. Lord Caitanya says that one should always try to associate with saintly persons because if one establishes a proper association with a saintly person, even for a moment, one attains all perfection. Somehow or other, if one meets a saintly person and achieves his favor, then the entire mission of one’s human life is fulfilled. In our personal experience we have actual proof of this statement of Manu. Once we had the opportunity to meet Viṣṇupāda Śrī Śrīmad Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Gosvāmī Mahārāja, and on first sight he requested this humble self to preach his message in the Western countries. There was no preparation for this, but somehow or other he desired it, and by his grace we are now engaged in executing his order, which has given us a transcendental occupation and has saved and liberated us from the occupation of material activities. Thus it is actually a fact that if one meets a saintly person completely engaged in transcendental duties and achieves his favor, then one’s life mission becomes complete. What is not possible to achieve in thousands of lives can be achieved in one moment if there is an opportunity to meet a saintly person. It is therefore enjoined in Vedic literature that one should always try to associate with saintly persons and try to disassociate oneself from the common man, because by one word of a saintly person one can be liberated from material entanglement. A saintly person has the power, because of his spiritual advancement, to give immediate liberation to the conditioned soul. Here Manu admits that all his doubts are now over because Kardama has very kindly described the different duties of individual souls.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From meeting you, all my doubts have been destroyed. You have affectionately explained the duties of the kṣatriya. I have come to you, my protector. Just by meeting you I have been protected. Rirakṣiṣoḥ means “of the kṣatriya.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.6

↗
దిష్టయ‍ా మే భగవాన్ ద‍ృష్టో దుర్దర్శో యోఽకృతాత్మనామ్ । దిష్టయ‍ా పాదరజ: స్పృష్టం శీర్ష్ణా మే భవత: శివమ్ ॥ ౬ ॥
diṣṭyā me bhagavān dṛṣṭo
[dishtyaa me bhagavaan drishto]
durdarśo yo ’kṛtātmanām
[durdarsho yo ’kritaatmanaam]
diṣṭyā pāda-rajaḥ spṛṣṭaṁ
[dishtyaa paada-rajah sprishtam]
śīrṣṇā me bhavataḥ śivam
[sheershnaa me bhavatah shivam]
diṣṭyā — by good fortune me — my bhagavān — all-powerful dṛṣṭaḥ — is seen durdarśaḥ — not easily seen yaḥ — who akṛta-ātmanām — of those who have not controlled the mind and senses diṣṭyā — by my good fortune pāda-rajaḥ — the dust of the feet spṛṣṭam — is touched śīrṣṇā — by the head me — my bhavataḥ — your śivam — causing all auspiciousness.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
diṣṭyā me bhagavān dṛṣṭo
diṣṭyā
by good fortune
me
my
bhagavān
all-powerful
dṛṣṭaḥ
is seen
durdarśo yo ’kṛtātmanām
durdarśaḥ
not easily seen
diṣṭyā pāda-rajaḥ spṛṣṭaṁ
yaḥ
who
akṛta-ātmanām
of those who have not controlled the mind and senses
diṣṭyā
by my good fortune
pāda-rajaḥ
the dust of the feet
spṛṣṭam
is touched
śīrṣṇā me bhavataḥ śivam
śīrṣṇā
by the head
me
my
bhavataḥ
your
śivam
causing all auspiciousness.
It is my good fortune that I have been able to see you, for you cannot easily be seen by persons who have not subdued the mind or controlled the senses. I am all the more fortunate to have touched with my head the blessed dust of your feet.

The perfection of transcendental life can be achieved simply by touching the holy dust of the lotus feet of a holy man. In the Bhāgavatam it is said, mahat-pāda-rajo-’bhiṣekam, which means to be blessed by the holy dust of the lotus feet of a mahat, a great devotee. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, mahātmānas tu: those who are great souls are under the spell of spiritual energy, and their symptom is that they fully engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness for the service of the Lord. Therefore they are called mahat. Unless one is fortunate enough to have the dust of the lotus feet of a mahātmā on one’s head, there is no possibility of perfection in spiritual life.

The paramparā system of disciplic succession is very important as a means of spiritual success. One becomes a mahat by the grace of his mahat spiritual master. If one takes shelter of the lotus feet of a great soul, there is every possibility of one’s also becoming a great soul. When Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa asked Jaḍa Bharata about his wonderful achievement of spiritual success, he replied to the King that spiritual success is not possible simply by following the rituals of religion or simply by converting oneself into a sannyāsī or offering sacrifices as recommended in the scriptures. These methods are undoubtedly helpful for spiritual realization, but the real effect is brought about by the grace of a mahātmā. In Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura’s eight stanzas of prayer to the spiritual master, it is clearly stated that simply by satisfying the spiritual master one can achieve the supreme success in life, and in spite of executing all ritualistic performances, if one cannot satisfy the spiritual master, one has no access to spiritual perfection. Here the word akṛtātmanām is very significant. Ātmā means “body,” “soul,” or “mind,” and akṛtātmā means the common man, who cannot control the senses or the mind. Because the common man is unable to control the senses and the mind, it is his duty to seek the shelter of a great soul or a great devotee of the Lord and just try to please him. That will make his life perfect. A common man cannot rise to the topmost stage of spiritual perfection simply by following the rituals and religious principles. He has to take shelter of a bona fide spiritual master and work under his direction faithfully and sincerely; then he becomes perfect, without a doubt.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By good fortune I have seen you, who cannot be seen by a person with no pious acts. By good fortune I have touched your auspicious foot dust to my head. Akṛtātmanām means “of those with no pious acts.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.7

↗
దిష్టయ‍ా త్వయానుశిష్టోఽహం కృతశ్చానుగ్రహో మహాన్ । అపావృతై: కర్ణరన్ధ్రైర్జుష్టా దిష్ట్యోశతీర్గిర: ॥ ౭ ॥
diṣṭyā tvayānuśiṣṭo ’haṁ
[dishtyaa tvayaanushishto ’ham]
kṛtaś cānugraho mahān
[kritash chaanugraho mahaan]
apāvṛtaiḥ karṇa-randhrair
[apaavritaih karna-randhrair]
juṣṭā diṣṭyośatīr giraḥ
[jushtaa dishtyoshateer girah]
diṣṭyā — luckily tvayā — by you anuśiṣṭaḥ — instructed aham — I kṛtaḥ — bestowed ca — and anugrahaḥ — favor mahān — great apāvṛtaiḥ — open karṇa-randhraiḥ — with the holes of the ears juṣṭāḥ — received diṣṭyā — by good fortune uśatīḥ — pure giraḥ — words.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
diṣṭyā tvayānuśiṣṭo ’haṁ
diṣṭyā
luckily
tvayā
by you
anuśiṣṭaḥ
instructed
kṛtaś cānugraho mahān
aham
I
kṛtaḥ
bestowed
ca
and
anugrahaḥ
favor
mahān
great
apāvṛtaiḥ karṇa-randhrair
apāvṛtaiḥ
open
karṇa-randhraiḥ
with the holes of the ears
juṣṭā diṣṭyośatīr giraḥ
juṣṭāḥ
received
diṣṭyā
by good fortune
uśatīḥ
pure
giraḥ
words.
I have fortunately been instructed by you, and thus great favor has been bestowed upon me. I thank God that I have listened with open ears to your pure words.

Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has given directions, in his Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu, on how to accept a bona fide spiritual master and how to deal with him. First, the desiring candidate must find a bona fide spiritual master, and then he must very eagerly receive instructions from him and execute them. This is reciprocal service. A bona fide spiritual master or saintly person always desires to elevate a common man who comes to him. Because everyone is under the delusion of māyā and is forgetful of his prime duty, Kṛṣṇa consciousness, a saintly person always desires that everyone become a saintly person. It is the function of a saintly person to invoke Kṛṣṇa consciousness in every forgetful common man.

Manu said that since he was advised and instructed by Kardama Muni, he was very much favored. He considered himself lucky to receive the message by aural reception. It is especially mentioned here that one should be very inquisitive to hear with open ears from the authorized source of the bona fide spiritual master. How is one to receive? One should receive the transcendental message by aural reception. The word karṇa-randhraiḥ means “through the holes of the ears.” The favor of the spiritual master is not received through any other part of the body but the ears. This does not mean, however, that the spiritual master gives a particular type of mantra through the ears in exchange for some dollars and if the man meditates on that he achieves perfection and becomes God within six months. Such reception through the ears is bogus. The real fact is that a bona fide spiritual master knows the nature of a particular man and what sort of duties he can perform in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and he instructs him in that way. He instructs him through the ear, not privately, but publicly. “You are fit for such and such work in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. You can act in this way.” One person is advised to act in Kṛṣṇa consciousness by working in the Deities’ room, another is advised to act in Kṛṣṇa consciousness by performing editorial work, another is advised to do preaching work, and another is advised to carry out Kṛṣṇa consciousness in the cooking department. There are different departments of activity in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and a spiritual master, knowing the particular ability of a particular man, trains him in such a way that by his tendency to act he becomes perfect. Bhagavad-gītā makes it clear that one can attain the highest perfection of spiritual life simply by offering service according to his ability, just as Arjuna served Kṛṣṇa by his ability in the military art. Arjuna offered his service fully as a military man, and he became perfect. Similarly, an artist can attain perfection simply by performing artistic work under the direction of the spiritual master. If one is a literary man, he can write articles and poetry for the service of the Lord under the direction of the spiritual master. One has to receive the message of the spiritual master regarding how to act in one’s capacity, for the spiritual master is expert in giving such instructions.

This combination, the instruction of the spiritual master and the faithful execution of the instruction by the disciple, makes the entire process perfect. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura describes in his explanation of the verse in Bhagavad-gītā, vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ, that one who wants to be certain to achieve spiritual success must take the instruction from the spiritual master as to what his particular function is. He should faithfully try to execute that particular instruction and should consider that his life and soul. The faithful execution of the instruction which he receives from the spiritual master is the only duty of a disciple, and that will bring him perfection. One should be very careful to receive the message from the spiritual master through the ears and execute it faithfully. That will make one’s life successful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By good fortune you have instructed me and given my great mercy. By good fortune, I have heard you pleasant words with open ears. Uśatīḥ stands for uśatyaḥ (pleasant).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.8

↗
స భవాన్దుహితృస్‍నేహపరిక్లిష్టాత్మనో మమ । శ్రోతుమర్హసి దీనస్య శ్రావితం కృపయా మునే ॥ ౮ ॥
sa bhavān duhitṛ-sneha-
[sa bhavaan duhitri-sneha-]
parikliṣṭātmano mama
[pariklishtaatmano mama]
śrotum arhasi dīnasya
[shrotum arhasi deenasya]
śrāvitaṁ kṛpayā mune
[shraavitam kripayaa mune]
saḥ — yourself bhavān — Your Honor duhitṛ-sneha — by affection for my daughter parikliṣṭa-ātmanaḥ — whose mind is agitated mama — my śrotum — to listen arhasi — be pleased dīnasya — of my humble self śrāvitam — to the prayer kṛpayā — graciously mune — O sage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa bhavān duhitṛ-sneha-
saḥ
yourself
bhavān
Your Honor
duhitṛ-sneha
by affection for my daughter
parikliṣṭātmano mama
parikliṣṭa-ātmanaḥ
whose mind is agitated
mama
my
śrotum arhasi dīnasya
śrotum
to listen
arhasi
be pleased
dīnasya
of my humble self
śrāvitaṁ kṛpayā mune
śrāvitam
to the prayer
kṛpayā
graciously
mune
O sage.
O great sage, graciously be pleased to listen to the prayer of my humble self, for my mind is troubled by affection for my daughter.

When a disciple is perfectly in consonance with the spiritual master, having received his message and executed it perfectly and sincerely, he has a right to ask a particular favor from the spiritual master. Generally a pure devotee of the Lord or a pure disciple of a bona fide spiritual master does not ask any favor either from the Lord or the spiritual master, but even if there is a need to ask a favor from the spiritual master, one cannot ask that favor without satisfying him fully. Svāyambhuva Manu wanted to disclose his mind regarding the function he wanted to execute due to affection for his daughter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O sage! You, well known as merciful, must mercifully hear a topic from lowly me, suffering from affection to my daughter. By seeing you all my suffering has been destroyed. But one suffering, hard to remove, remains in my heart. Having been given relief by you mercy, I will remove that suffering also along with the others which have gone. You are an ocean of mercy (saḥ). I have one suffering that does not go away even by power of discrimination (parikliṣṭa).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.9

↗
ప్రియవ్రతోత్తానపదో: స్వసేయం దుహితా మమ । అన్విచ్ఛతి పతిం యుక్తం వయ: శీలగుణాదిభి: ॥ ౯ ॥
priyavratottānapadoḥ
[priyavratottaanapadoh]
svaseyaṁ duhitā mama
[svaseyam duhitaa mama]
anvicchati patiṁ yuktaṁ
[anvichchati patim yuktam]
vayaḥ-śīla-guṇādibhiḥ
[vayah-sheela-gunaadibhih]
priyavrata-uttānapadoḥ — of Priyavrata and Uttānapāda svasā — sister iyam — this duhitā — daughter mama — my anvicchati — is seeking patim — husband yuktam — suited vayaḥ-śīla-guṇa-ādibhiḥ — by age, character, good qualities, etc.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
priyavratottānapadoḥ
priyavrata-uttānapadoḥ
of Priyavrata and Uttānapāda
svaseyaṁ duhitā mama
svasā
sister
iyam
this
duhitā
daughter
mama
my
anvicchati patiṁ yuktaṁ
anvicchati
is seeking
patim
husband
yuktam
suited
vayaḥ-śīla-guṇādibhiḥ
vayaḥ-śīla-guṇa-ādibhiḥ
by age, character, good qualities, etc.
My daughter is the sister of Priyavrata and Uttānapāda. She is seeking a suitable husband in terms of age, character and good qualities.

The grown-up daughter of Svāyambhuva Manu, Devahūti, had good character and was well qualified; therefore she was searching for a suitable husband just befitting her age, qualities and character. The purpose of Manu’s introducing his daughter as the sister of Priyavrata and Uttānapāda, two great kings, was to convince the sage that the girl came from a great family. She was his daughter and at the same time the sister of kṣatriyas; she did not come from a lower-class family. Manu therefore offered her to Kardama as just suitable for his purpose. It is clear that although the daughter was mature in age and qualities, she did not go out and find her husband independently. She expressed her desire for a suitable husband corresponding to her character, age and quality, and the father himself, out of affection for his daughter, took charge of finding such a husband.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sister of Priyavrata and Uttānapāda, my daughter, is seeking a husband suitable in age, conduct and qualities. Unnecessary worries are removed by mentioning that she has two brothers. By mentioned that it is his daughter, he indicates that a kṣatriya’s daughter is suitable for the sage.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.10

↗
యదా తు భవత: శీలశ్రుతరూపవయోగుణాన్ । అశ‍ృణోన్నారదాదేషా త్వయ్యాసీత్కృతనిశ్చయా ॥ ౧౦ ॥
yadā tu bhavataḥ śīla-
[yadaa tu bhavatah sheela-]
śruta-rūpa-vayo-guṇān
[shruta-roopa-vayo-gunaan]
aśṛṇon nāradād eṣā
[ashrinon naaradaad eshaa]
tvayy āsīt kṛta-niścayā
[tvayy aaseet krita-nishchayaa]
yadā — when tu — but bhavataḥ — your śīla — noble character śruta — learning rūpa — beautiful appearance vayaḥ — youth guṇān — virtues aśṛṇot — heard nāradāt — from Nārada Muni eṣā — Devahūti tvayi — in you āsīt — became kṛta-niścayā — fixed in determination.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā tu bhavataḥ śīla-
yadā
when
tu
but
bhavataḥ
your
śīla
noble character
śruta-rūpa-vayo-guṇān
śruta
learning
rūpa
beautiful appearance
vayaḥ
youth
guṇān
virtues
aśṛṇon nāradād eṣā
aśṛṇot
heard
nāradāt
from Nārada Muni
eṣā
Devahūti
tvayy āsīt kṛta-niścayā
tvayi
in you
āsīt
became
kṛta-niścayā
fixed in determination.
The moment she heard from the sage Nārada of your noble character, learning, beautiful appearance, youth and other virtues, she fixed her mind upon you.

The girl Devahūti did not personally see Kardama Muni, nor did she personally experience his character or qualities, since there was no social intercourse by which she could gain such understanding. But she heard about Kardama Muni from the authority of Nārada Muni. Hearing from an authority is a better experience than gaining personal understanding. She heard from Nārada Muni that Kardama Muni was just fit to be her husband; therefore she became fixed in her heart that she would marry him, and she expressed her desire to her father, who therefore brought her before him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When she heard of your age, qualities, form, learning and conduct from Nārada, she decided on you as her husband.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.11

↗
తత్ప్రతీచ్ఛ ద్విజాగ్ర్యేమాం శ్రద్ధయోపహృతాం మయా । సర్వాత్మనానురూపాం తే గృహమేధిషు కర్మసు ॥ ౧౧ ॥
tat pratīccha dvijāgryemāṁ
[tat prateechcha dvijaagryemaam]
śraddhayopahṛtāṁ mayā
[shraddhayopahritaam mayaa]
sarvātmanānurūpāṁ te
[sarvaatmanaanuroopaam te]
gṛhamedhiṣu karmasu
[grihamedhishu karmasu]
tat — therefore pratīccha — please accept dvija-agrya — O best of the brāhmaṇas imām — her śraddhayā — with faith upahṛtām — offered as a presentation mayā — by me sarva-ātmanā — in every way anurūpām — suitable te — for you gṛha-medhiṣu — in the household karmasu — duties.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat pratīccha dvijāgryemāṁ
tat
therefore
pratīccha
please accept
dvija-agrya
O best of the brāhmaṇas
imām
her
śraddhayopahṛtāṁ mayā
śraddhayā
with faith
sarvātmanānurūpāṁ te
upahṛtām
offered as a presentation
gṛhamedhiṣu karmasu
mayā
by me
sarva-ātmanā
in every way
anurūpām
suitable
te
for you
gṛha-medhiṣu
in the household
karmasu
duties.
Therefore please accept her, O chief of the brāhmaṇas, for I offer her with faith and she is in every respect fit to be your wife and take charge of your household duties.

The words gṛhamedhiṣu karmasu mean “in household duties.” Another word is also used here: sarvātmanānurūpām. The purport is that a wife should not only be equal to her husband in age, character and qualities, but must be helpful to him in his household duties. The household duty of a man is not to satisfy his sense gratification, but to remain with a wife and children and at the same time attain advancement in spiritual life. One who does not do so is not a householder but a gṛhamedhī. Two words are used in Sanskrit literature; one is gṛhastha, and the other is gṛhamedhī. The difference between gṛhamedhī and gṛhastha is that gṛhastha is also an āśrama, or spiritual order, but if one simply satisfies his senses as a householder, then he is a gṛhamedhī. For a gṛhamedhī, to accept a wife means to satisfy the senses, but for a gṛhastha a qualified wife is an assistant in every respect for advancement in spiritual activities. It is the duty of the wife to take charge of household affairs and not to compete with the husband. A wife is meant to help, but she cannot help her husband unless he is completely equal to her in age, character and quality.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Best of brāhmaṇas! Therefore accept her, suitable in every way for duties of houshold life, offered by me with faith.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.12

↗
ఉద్యతస్య హి కామస్య ప్రతివాదో న శస్యతే । అపి నిర్ముక్తసఙ్గస్య కామరక్తస్య కిం పున: ॥ ౧౨ ॥
udyatasya hi kāmasya
[udyatasya hi kaamasya]
prativādo na śasyate
[prativaado na shasyate]
api nirmukta-saṅgasya
[api nirmukta-sangasya]
kāma-raktasya kiṁ punaḥ
[kaama-raktasya kim punah]
udyatasya — which has come of itself hi — in fact kāmasya — of material desire prativādaḥ — the denial na — not śasyate — to be praised api — even nirmukta — of one who is free saṅgasya — from attachment kāma — to sensual pleasures raktasya — of one addicted kim punaḥ — how much less.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
udyatasya hi kāmasya
udyatasya
which has come of itself
hi
in fact
kāmasya
of material desire
prativādo na śasyate
prativādaḥ
the denial
na
not
śasyate
to be praised
api nirmukta-saṅgasya
api
even
nirmukta
of one who is free
saṅgasya
from attachment
kāma-raktasya kiṁ punaḥ
kāma
to sensual pleasures
raktasya
of one addicted
kim punaḥ
how much less.
To deny an offering that has come of itself is not commendable even for one absolutely free from all attachment, much less one addicted to sensual pleasure.

In material life everyone is desirous of sense gratification; therefore, a person who gets an object of sense gratification without endeavor should not refuse to accept it. Kardama Muni was not meant for sense gratification, yet he aspired to marry and prayed to the Lord for a suitable wife. This was known to Svāyambhuva Manu. He indirectly convinced Kardama Muni: “You desire a suitable wife like my daughter, and she is now present before you. You should not reject the fulfillment of your prayer; you should accept my daughter.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Denial of sense objects which come of their own accord is not recommended even for a person who is detached, what to speak of a person with desire for the object. You should not say that you cannot accept my daughter because you are a detached ascetic. Sense objects which come of their own accord (udyatasya) should not be denied. Knowing your inner desire I have come here. You should not conceal your desire from me. He identifies Kardama as kāma-raktasya.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.13

↗
య ఉద్యతమనాద‍ృత్య కీనాశమభియాచతే । క్షీయతే తద్యశ: స్ఫీతం మానశ్చావజ్ఞయా హత: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
ya udyatam anādṛtya
[ya udyatam anaadritya]
kīnāśam abhiyācate
[keenaasham abhiyaachate]
kṣīyate tad-yaśaḥ sphītaṁ
[ksheeyate tad-yashah spheetam]
mānaś cāvajṣayā hataḥ
[maanash chaavajshayaa hatah]
yaḥ — who udyatam — an offering anādṛtya — rejecting kīnāśam — from a miser abhiyācate — begs kṣīyate — is lost tat — his yaśaḥ — reputation sphītam — widespread mānaḥ — honor ca — and avajṣayā — by neglectful behavior hataḥ — destroyed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ya udyatam anādṛtya
yaḥ
who
udyatam
an offering
anādṛtya
rejecting
kīnāśam abhiyācate
kīnāśam
from a miser
abhiyācate
begs
kṣīyate tad-yaśaḥ sphītaṁ
kṣīyate
is lost
tat
his
yaśaḥ
reputation
sphītam
widespread
mānaś cāvajṣayā hataḥ
mānaḥ
honor
ca
and
avajṣayā
by neglectful behavior
hataḥ
destroyed.
One who rejects an offering that comes of its own accord but later begs a boon from a miser thus loses his widespread reputation, and his pride is humbled by the neglectful behavior of others.

The general procedure of Vedic marriage is that a father offers his daughter to a suitable boy. That is a very respectable marriage. A boy should not go to the girl’s father and ask for the hand of his daughter in marriage. That is considered to be humbling one’s respectable position. Svāyambhuva Manu wanted to convince Kardama Muni, since he knew that the sage wanted to marry a suitable girl: “I am offering just such a suitable wife. Do not reject the offer, or else, because you are in need of a wife, you will have to ask for such a wife from someone else, who may not behave with you so well. In that case your position will be humbled.”

Another feature of this incident is that Svāyambhuva Manu was the emperor, but he went to offer his qualified daughter to a poor brāhmaṇa. Kardama Muni had no worldly possessions — he was a hermit living in the forest — but he was advanced in culture. Therefore, in offering one’s daughter to a person, the culture and quality are counted as prominent, not wealth or any other material consideration.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One who rejects what comes of its own accord but begs from a miser has his glorious fame destroyed. His honor is destroyed by becoming neglected by others. This verse speaks of conduct in this world. One who rejects something out of shyness and because of concern for position, and then begs that object from one who will not give it, loses fame. Shyness and concern for position are soon destroyed by the strength of the desire. One’s honor also is destroyed. Even the wise man of mature vision should accept those objects not forbidden which come without asking by good fortunate, after surmising that, even having detachment, it will be destroyed by the desire in ones mind.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.14

↗
అహం త్వాశ‍ృణవం విద్వన్ వివాహార్థం సముద్యతమ్ । అతస్త్వముపకుర్వాణ: ప్రత్తాం ప్రతిగృహాణ మే ॥ ౧౪ ॥
ahaṁ tvāśṛṇavaṁ vidvan
[aham tvaashrinavam vidvan]
vivāhārthaṁ samudyatam
[vivaahaartham samudyatam]
atas tvam upakurvāṇaḥ
[atas tvam upakurvaanah]
prattāṁ pratigṛhāṇa me
[prattaam pratigrihaana me]
aham — I tvā — you aśṛṇavam — heard vidvan — O wise man vivāha-artham — for the sake of marriage samudyatam — prepared ataḥ — hence tvam — you upakurvāṇaḥ — not taken a vow of perpetual celibacy prattām — offered pratigṛhāṇa — please accept me — of me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ahaṁ tvāśṛṇavaṁ vidvan
aham
I
tvā
you
aśṛṇavam
heard
vidvan
O wise man
vivāhārthaṁ samudyatam
vivāha-artham
for the sake of marriage
samudyatam
prepared
atas tvam upakurvāṇaḥ
ataḥ
hence
tvam
you
upakurvāṇaḥ
not taken a vow of perpetual celibacy
prattāṁ pratigṛhāṇa me
prattām
offered
pratigṛhāṇa
please accept
me
of me.
Svāyambhuva Manu continued: O wise man, I heard that you were prepared to marry. Please accept her hand, which is being offered to you by me, since you have not taken a vow of perpetual celibacy.

The principle of brahmacarya is celibacy. There are two kinds of brahmacārīs. One is called naiṣṭhika-brahmacārī, which means one who takes a vow of celibacy for his whole life, whereas the other, the upakurvāṇa-brahmacārī, is a brahmacārī who takes the vow of celibacy up to a certain age. For example, he may take the vow to remain celibate up to twenty-five years of age; then, with the permission of his spiritual master, he enters married life. Brahmacarya is student life, the beginning of life in the spiritual orders, and the principle of brahmacarya is celibacy. Only a householder can indulge in sense gratification or sex life, not a brahmacārī. Svāyambhuva Manu requested Kardama Muni to accept his daughter, since Kardama had not taken the vow of naiṣṭhika-brahmacarya. He was willing to marry, and the suitable daughter of a high royal family was presented.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O learned one! I have heard that you are prepared to get married. Being celibate up till this point, please accept the daughter I offer. “How did you know the desire in my mind?” Do not ask about knowing. I have even heard this. I have heard this from the mouth of the Supreme Lord who appeared before me. Upakurvāṇaḥ is a person who has been celibate up till this point, but can get married. Prattām me means “given by me.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.15

↗
ఋషిరువాచ బాఢముద్వోఢుకామోఽహమప్రత్తా చ తవాత్మజా । ఆవయోరనురూపోఽసావాద్యో వైవాహికో విధి: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
ṛṣir uvāca
[rishir uvaacha]
bāḍham udvoḍhu-kāmo ’ham
[baadham udvodhu-kaamo ’ham]
aprattā ca tavātmajā
[aprattaa cha tavaatmajaa]
āvayor anurūpo ’sāv
[aavayor anuroopo ’saav]
ādyo vaivāhiko vidhiḥ
[aadyo vaivaahiko vidhih]
ṛṣiḥ — the great sage Kardama uvāca — said bāḍham — very well udvoḍhu-kāmaḥ — desirous to marry aham — I aprattā — not promised to anyone else ca — and tava — your ātma-jā — daughter āvayoḥ — of us two anurūpaḥ — proper asau — this ādyaḥ — first vaivāhikaḥ — of marriage vidhiḥ — ritualistic ceremony.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ṛṣir uvāca
ṛṣiḥ
the great sage Kardama
uvāca
said
bāḍham udvoḍhu-kāmo ’ham
bāḍham
very well
udvoḍhu-kāmaḥ
desirous to marry
aprattā ca tavātmajā
āvayor anurūpo ’sāv
ādyo vaivāhiko vidhiḥ
aham
I
aprattā
not promised to anyone else
ca
and
tava
your
ātma-jā
daughter
āvayoḥ
of us two
anurūpaḥ
proper
asau
this
ādyaḥ
first
vaivāhikaḥ
of marriage
vidhiḥ
ritualistic ceremony.
The great sage replied: Certainly I have a desire to marry, and your daughter has not yet married or given her word to anyone. Therefore our marriage according to the Vedic system can take place.

There were many considerations by Kardama Muni before accepting the daughter of Svāyambhuva Manu. Most important is that Devahūti had first of all fixed her mind on marrying him. She did not choose to have any other man as her husband. That is a great consideration because female psychology dictates that when a woman offers her heart to a man for the first time, it is very difficult for her to take it back. Also, she had not married before; she was a virgin girl. All these considerations convinced Kardama Muni to accept her. Therefore he said, “Yes, I shall accept your daughter under religious regulations of marriage.” There are different kinds of marriages, of which the first-class marriage is held by inviting a suitable bridegroom for the daughter and giving her in charity, well dressed and well decorated with ornaments, along with a dowry according to the means of the father. There are other kinds of marriage, such as gāndharva marriage and marriage by love, which are also accepted as marriage. Even if one is forcibly kidnapped and later on accepted as a wife, that is also accepted. But Kardama Muni accepted the first-class way of marriage because the father was willing and the daughter was qualified. She had never offered her heart to anyone else. All these considerations made Kardama Muni agree to accept the daughter of Svāyambhuva Manu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sage said: Yes, I desire to get married and your daughter has not been given to anyone else. This is a suitable marriage for us since there has been no previous marriage. Aprattā means “not promised to anyone else.” Ādyaḥ means not previously married.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.16

↗
కామ: స భూయాన్నరదేవ తేఽస్యా: పుత్ర్యా: సమామ్నాయవిధౌ ప్రతీత: । క ఏవ తే తనయాం నాద్రియేత స్వయైవ కాన్త్యా క్షిపతీమివ శ్రియమ్ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
kāmaḥ sa bhūyān naradeva te ’syāḥ
[kaamah sa bhooyaan naradeva te ’syaah]
putryāḥ samāmnāya-vidhau pratītaḥ
[putryaah samaamnaaya-vidhau prateetah]
ka eva te tanayāṁ nādriyeta
[ka eva te tanayaam naadriyeta]
svayaiva kāntyā kṣipatīm iva śriyam
[svayaiva kaantyaa kshipateem iva shriyam]
kāmaḥ — desire saḥ — that bhūyāt — let it be fulfilled nara-deva — O King te — your asyāḥ — this putryāḥ — of the daughter samāmnāya-vidhau — in the process of the Vedic scriptures pratītaḥ — recognized kaḥ — who eva — in fact te — your tanayām — daughter na ādriyeta — would not adore svayā — by her own eva — alone kāntyā — bodily luster kṣipatīm — excelling iva — as if śriyam — ornaments.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāmaḥ sa bhūyān naradeva te ’syāḥ
kāmaḥ
desire
saḥ
that
bhūyāt
let it be fulfilled
nara-deva
O King
te
your
putryāḥ samāmnāya-vidhau pratītaḥ
ka eva te tanayāṁ nādriyeta
svayaiva kāntyā kṣipatīm iva śriyam
asyāḥ
this
putryāḥ
of the daughter
samāmnāya-vidhau
in the process of the Vedic scriptures
pratītaḥ
recognized
kaḥ
who
eva
in fact
te
your
tanayām
daughter
na ādriyeta
would not adore
svayā
by her own
eva
alone
kāntyā
bodily luster
kṣipatīm
excelling
iva
as if
śriyam
ornaments.
Let your daughter’s desire for marriage, which is recognized in the Vedic scriptures, be fulfilled. Who would not accept her hand? She is so beautiful that by her bodily luster alone she excels the beauty of her ornaments.

Kardama Muni wanted to marry Devahūti in the recognized manner of marriage prescribed in the scriptures. As stated in the Vedic scriptures, the first-class process is to call the bridegroom to the home of the bride and hand her to him in charity with a dowry of necessary ornaments, gold, furniture and other household paraphernalia. This form of marriage is prevalent among higher-class Hindus even today and is declared in the śāstras to confer great religious merit on the bride’s father. To give a daughter in charity to a suitable son-in-law is considered to be one of the pious activities of a householder. There are eight forms of marriage mentioned in the scripture Manu-smṛti, but only one process of marriage, brāhma or rājasika marriage, is now current. Other kinds of marriage — by love, by exchange of garlands or by kidnapping the bride — are now forbidden in this Kali age. Formerly, at their pleasure kṣatriyas would kidnap a princess from another royal house and there would be a fight between the kṣatriya and the girl’s family; then, if the kidnapper was the winner, the girl would be offered to him for marriage. Even Kṛṣṇa married Rukmiṇī by that process, and some of His sons and grandsons also married by kidnapping. Kṛṣṇa’s grandsons kidnapped Duryodhana’s daughter, which caused a fight between the Kuru and Yadu families. Afterward, an adjustment was made by the elderly members of the Kuru family. Such marriages were current in bygone ages, but at the present moment they are impossible because the strict principles of kṣatriya life have practically been abolished. Since India has become dependent on foreign countries, the particular influences of her social orders have been lost; now, according to the scriptures, everyone is a śūdra. The so-called brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas have forgotten their traditional activities, and in the absence of these activities they are called śūdras. It is said in the scriptures, kalau śūdra-sambhavaḥ. In the Age of Kali everyone will be like śūdras. The traditional social customs are not followed in this age, although formerly they were followed strictly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Let the desire of your daughter, recognized by the scripture, be fulfilled. Who would not respect your daughter whose beauty decries all other beauty. She is situated such that her beauty decries all other beauty.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.17

↗
యాం హర్మ్యపృష్ఠే క్‍వణదఙ్‌ఘ్రిశోభాం విక్రీడతీం కన్దుకవిహ్వలాక్షీమ్ । విశ్‍వావసుర్న్యపతత్స్వాద్విమానా- ద్విలోక్య సమ్మోహవిమూఢచేతా: ॥ ౧౭ ॥
yāṁ harmya-pṛṣṭhe kvaṇad-aṅghri-śobhāṁ
[yaam harmya-prishthe kvanad-anghri-shobhaam]
vikrīḍatīṁ kanduka-vihvalākṣīm
[vikreedateem kanduka-vihvalaaksheem]
viśvāvasur nyapatat svād vimānād
[vishvaavasur nyapatat svaad vimaanaad]
vilokya sammoha-vimūḍha-cetāḥ
[vilokya sammoha-vimoodha-chetaah]
yām — whom harmya-pṛṣṭhe — on the roof of the palace kvaṇat-aṅghri-śobhām — whose beauty was heightened by the tinkling ornaments on her feet vikrīḍatīm — playing kanduka-vihvala-akṣīm — with eyes bewildered, following her ball viśvāvasuḥ — Viśvāvasu nyapatat — fell down svāt — from his own vimānāt — from the airplane vilokya — seeing sammoha-vimūḍha-cetāḥ — whose mind was stupefied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yāṁ harmya-pṛṣṭhe kvaṇad-aṅghri-śobhāṁ
yām
whom
harmya-pṛṣṭhe
on the roof of the palace
kvaṇat-aṅghri-śobhām
whose beauty was heightened by the tinkling ornaments on her feet
vikrīḍatīṁ kanduka-vihvalākṣīm
vikrīḍatīm
playing
kanduka-vihvala-akṣīm
with eyes bewildered, following her ball
viśvāvasuḥ
Viśvāvasu
viśvāvasur nyapatat svād vimānād
nyapatat
fell down
svāt
from his own
vimānāt
from the airplane
vilokya sammoha-vimūḍha-cetāḥ
vilokya
seeing
sammoha-vimūḍha-cetāḥ
whose mind was stupefied.
I have heard that Viśvāvasu, the great Gandharva, his mind stupefied with infatuation, fell from his airplane after seeing your daughter playing with a ball on the roof of the palace, for she was indeed beautiful with her tinkling ankle bells and her eyes moving to and fro.

It is understood that not only at the present moment but in those days also there were skyscrapers. Herein we find the word harmya-pṛṣṭhe. Harmya means “a very big palatial building.” Svād vimānāt means “from his own airplane.” It is suggested that private airplanes or helicopters were also current in those days. The Gandharva Viśvāvasu, while flying in the sky, could see Devahūti playing ball on the roof of the palace. Ball playing was also current, but aristocratic girls would not play in a public place. Ball playing and other such pleasures were not meant for ordinary women and girls; only princesses like Devahūti could indulge in such sports. It is described here that she was seen from the flying airplane. This indicates that the palace was very high, otherwise how could one see her from an airplane? The vision was so distinct that the Gandharva Viśvāvasu was bewildered by her beauty and by hearing the sound of her ankle bangles, and being captivated by the sound and beauty, he fell down. Kardama Muni mentioned the incident as he had heard it.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Viśvāvasu, seeing her with beautiful feet jingling as she played on the roof of the palace, with eyes fixed on a ball, fell from his airplane, because his mind was completely bewildered. Having described her unequalled beauty and good qualities, he describes her natural power by the ornament of vyatirekha. She had feet made beautiful by the sound of her bells. Seeing her, Viśvāvasu became bewildered, and fell from his airplane to the earth (ni). He became like a corpse on seeing her. Because of his great offence in looking at her with attachment, he received immediate results of that offence by falling. “But he simply looked at her.” The offence is indicated by the word vilokya, which can indicate “she, being seen by him.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.18

↗
తాం ప్రార్థయన్తీం లలనాలలామ- మసేవితశ్రీచరణైరద‍ృష్టామ్ । వత్సాం మనోరుచ్చపద: స్వసారం కో నానుమన్యేత బుధోఽభియాతామ్ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
tāṁ prārthayantīṁ lalanā-lalāmam
[taam praarthayanteem lalanaa-lalaamam]
asevita-śrī-caraṇair adṛṣṭām
[asevita-shree-charanair adrishtaam]
vatsāṁ manor uccapadaḥ svasāraṁ
[vatsaam manor uchchapadah svasaaram]
ko nānumanyeta budho ’bhiyātām
[ko naanumanyeta budho ’bhiyaataam]
tām — her prārthayantīm — seeking lalanā-lalāmam — the ornament of women asevita-śrī-caraṇaiḥ — by those who have not worshiped the feet of Lakṣmī adṛṣṭām — not seen vatsām — beloved daughter manoḥ — of Svāyambhuva Manu uccapadaḥ — of Uttānapāda svasāram — sister kaḥ — what na anumanyeta — would not welcome budhaḥ — wise man abhiyātām — who has come of her own accord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāṁ prārthayantīṁ lalanā-lalāmam
tām
her
prārthayantīm
seeking
lalanā-lalāmam
the ornament of women
asevita-śrī-caraṇair adṛṣṭām
asevita-śrī-caraṇaiḥ
by those who have not worshiped the feet of Lakṣmī
adṛṣṭām
not seen
vatsāṁ manor uccapadaḥ svasāraṁ
vatsām
beloved daughter
manoḥ
of Svāyambhuva Manu
uccapadaḥ
of Uttānapāda
svasāram
sister
kaḥ
what
ko nānumanyeta budho ’bhiyātām
na anumanyeta
would not welcome
budhaḥ
wise man
abhiyātām
who has come of her own accord.
What wise man would not welcome her, the very ornament of womanhood, the beloved daughter of Svāyambhuva Manu and sister of Uttānapāda? Those who have not worshiped the gracious feet of the goddess of fortune cannot even perceive her, yet she has come of her own accord to seek my hand.

Kardama Muni praised the beauty and qualification of Devahūti in different ways. Devahūti was actually the ornament of all ornamented beautiful girls. A girl becomes beautiful by putting ornaments on her body, but Devahūti was more beautiful than the ornaments; she was considered the ornament of the ornamented beautiful girls. Demigods and Gandharvas were attracted by her beauty. Kardama Muni, although a great sage, was not a denizen of the heavenly planets, but it is mentioned in the previous verse that Viśvāvasu, who came from heaven, was also attracted by the beauty of Devahūti. Besides her personal beauty, she was the daughter of Emperor Svāyambhuva and sister of King Uttānapāda. Who could refuse the hand of such a girl?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What wise man would not honor this ornament among women, daughter of Manu and sister of Uttānapāda, unseen by those who do not worship Lakṣmī, and who has come of her own accord seeking me? No one would not accept her. She cannot be seen by those who do not worship Lakṣmī. I have worshipped the feet of Lakṣmī, the consort of my deity Nārāyaṇa, and thus I can see here. But no one else can. Viśvāvasu, moving in the sky, saw only the effulgence of her beauty, but not her personally. The excellence of her noble family is described. She is the object of affection (vatsām) of you, Manu. She is the sister of Uttānapāda. Because Priyavrata had gone away, he is not mentioned. Abhiyātam means “attained without endeavour.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.19

↗
అతో భజిష్యే సమయేన సాధ్వీం యావత్తేజో బిభృయాదాత్మనో మే । అతో ధర్మాన్ పారమహంస్యముఖ్యాన్ శుక్లప్రోక్తాన్ బహు మన్యేఽవిహింస్రాన్ ॥ ౧౯ ॥
ato bhajiṣye samayena sādhvīṁ
[ato bhajishye samayena saadhveem]
yāvat tejo bibhṛyād ātmano me
[yaavat tejo bibhriyaad aatmano me]
ato dharmān pāramahaṁsya-mukhyān
[ato dharmaan paaramahamsya-mukhyaan]
śukla-proktān bahu manye ’vihiṁsrān
[shukla-proktaan bahu manye ’vihimsraan]
ataḥ — therefore bhajiṣye — I shall accept samayena — on the conditions sādhvīm — the chaste girl yāvat — until tejaḥ — semen bibhṛyāt — may bear ātmanaḥ — from my body me — my ataḥ — thereafter dharmān — the duties pāramahaṁsya-mukhyān — of the best of the paramahaṁsas śukla-proktān — spoken by Lord Viṣṇu bahu — much manye — I shall consider avihiṁsrān — free from envy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ato bhajiṣye samayena sādhvīṁ
ataḥ
therefore
bhajiṣye
I shall accept
samayena
on the conditions
sādhvīm
the chaste girl
yāvat tejo bibhṛyād ātmano me
yāvat
until
tejaḥ
semen
bibhṛyāt
may bear
ātmanaḥ
from my body
me
my
ato dharmān pāramahaṁsya-mukhyān
ataḥ
thereafter
dharmān
the duties
pāramahaṁsya-mukhyān
of the best of the paramahaṁsas
śukla-proktān bahu manye ’vihiṁsrān
śukla-proktān
spoken by Lord Viṣṇu
bahu
much
manye
I shall consider
avihiṁsrān
free from envy.
Therefore I shall accept this chaste girl as my wife, on the condition that after she bears semen from my body, I shall accept the life of devotional service accepted by the most perfect human beings. That process was described by Lord Viṣṇu. It is free from envy.

Kardama Muni expressed his desire for a very beautiful wife to Emperor Svāyambhuva and accepted the Emperor’s daughter for marriage. Kardama Muni was in the hermitage practicing complete celibacy as a brahmacārī, and although he had the desire to marry, he did not want to be a householder for the whole span of his life because he was conversant with the Vedic principles of human life. According to Vedic principles, the first part of life should be utilized in brahmacarya for the development of character and spiritual qualities. In the next part of life, one may accept a wife and beget children, but one should not beget children like cats and dogs.

Kardama Muni desired to beget a child who would be a ray of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. One should beget a child who can perform the duties of Viṣṇu, otherwise there is no need to produce children. There are two kinds of children born of good fathers: one is educated in Kṛṣṇa consciousness so that he can be delivered from the clutches of māyā in that very life, and the other is a ray of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and teaches the world the ultimate goal of life. As will be described in later chapters, Kardama Muni begot such a child — Kapila, the incarnation of the Personality of Godhead who enunciated the philosophy of Sāṅkhya. Great householders pray to God to send His representative so that there may be an auspicious movement in human society. This is one reason to beget a child. Another reason is that a highly enlightened parent can train a child in Kṛṣṇa consciousness so that the child will not have to come back again to this miserable world. Parents should see to it that the child born of them does not enter the womb of a mother again. Unless one can train a child for liberation in that life, there is no need to marry or produce children. If human society produces children like cats and dogs for the disturbance of social order, then the world becomes hellish, as it has in this Age of Kali. In this age, neither parents nor their children are trained; both are animalistic and simply eat, sleep, mate, defend, and gratify their senses. This disorder in social life cannot bring peace to human society. Kardama Muni explains beforehand that he would not associate with the girl Devahūti for the whole duration of his life. He would simply associate with her until she had a child. In other words, sex life should be utilized only to produce a nice child, not for any other purpose. Human life is especially meant for complete devotion to the service of the Lord. That is the philosophy of Lord Caitanya.

After fulfilling his responsibility to produce a nice child, one should take sannyāsa and engage in the perfectional paramahaṁsa stage. Paramahaṁsa refers to the most highly elevated perfectional stage of life. There are four stages within sannyāsa life, and paramahaṁsa is the highest order. The Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is called the paramahaṁsa-saṁhitā, the treatise for the highest class of human beings. The paramahaṁsa is free from envy. In other stages, even in the householder stage of life, there is competition and envy, but since the activities of the human being in the paramahaṁsa stage are completely engaged in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or devotional service, there is no scope for envy. In the same order as Kardama Muni, about one hundred years ago, Ṭhākura Bhaktivinoda also wanted to beget a child who could preach the philosophy and teachings of Lord Caitanya to the fullest extent. By his prayers to the Lord he had as his child Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Gosvāmī Mahārāja, who at the present moment is preaching the philosophy of Lord Caitanya throughout the entire world through his bona fide disciples.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As a verbal agreement, I will accept this chaste woman until I produce offspring. Then I will consider practicing the path of bhakti, which is greater than renunciation, as explained by the Supreme Lord, and which is endowed with non-violence. I will be a householder until I produce children. Then I will renounce. Samaya is a verbal agreement. Or “I will accept the girl when the power from my body will become fruitful. I will accept her when there is opportunity after completing my austerities.” Ātmanaḥ me tejaḥ also refers to the Kapila, who is the power of my worshipable lord. I will accept the chief dharma of the paramahaṁsas or the path of renounced bhakti which is superior to that of paramahaṁsas, which has been explained directly (pra) by Viṣṇu (śukla), and is without violence (avihimṣrān). I will give respect to that as worthy of performing.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.20

↗
యతోఽభవద్విశ్వమిదం విచిత్రం సంస్థాస్యతే యత్ర చ వావతిష్ఠతే । ప్రజాపతీనాం పతిరేష మహ్యం పరం ప్రమాణం భగవాననన్త: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
yato ’bhavad viśvam idaṁ vicitraṁ
[yato ’bhavad vishvam idam vichitram]
saṁsthāsyate yatra ca vāvatiṣṭhate
[samsthaasyate yatra cha vaavatishthate]
prajāpatīnāṁ patir eṣa mahyaṁ
[prajaapateenaam patir esha mahyam]
paraṁ pramāṇaṁ bhagavān anantaḥ
[param pramaanam bhagavaan anantah]
yataḥ — from whom abhavat — emanated viśvam — creation idam — this vicitram — wonderful saṁsthāsyate — will dissolve yatra — in whom ca — and vā — or avatiṣṭhate — presently exists prajā-patīnām — of the Prajāpatis patiḥ — the Lord eṣaḥ — this mahyam — to me param — highest pramāṇam — authority bhagavān — Supreme Lord anantaḥ — unlimited.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yato ’bhavad viśvam idaṁ vicitraṁ
yataḥ
from whom
abhavat
emanated
viśvam
creation
idam
this
vicitram
wonderful
saṁsthāsyate yatra ca vāvatiṣṭhate
saṁsthāsyate
will dissolve
yatra
in whom
ca
and
vā
or
avatiṣṭhate
presently exists
prajāpatīnāṁ patir eṣa mahyaṁ
prajā-patīnām
of the Prajāpatis
patiḥ
the Lord
eṣaḥ
this
mahyam
to me
paraṁ pramāṇaṁ bhagavān anantaḥ
param
highest
pramāṇam
authority
bhagavān
Supreme Lord
anantaḥ
unlimited.
The highest authority for me is the unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead, from whom this wonderful creation emanates and in whom its sustenance and dissolution rest. He is the origin of all Prajāpatis, the personalities meant to produce living entities in this world.

Kardama Muni was ordered by his father, Prajāpati, to produce children. In the beginning of creation the Prajāpatis were meant to produce the large population which was to reside in the planets of the gigantic universe. But Kardama Muni said that although his father was Prajāpati, who desired him to produce children, actually his origin was the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, because Viṣṇu is the origin of everything; He is the actual creator of this universe, He is the actual maintainer, and when everything is annihilated, it rests in Him only. That is the conclusion of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. For creation, maintenance and annihilation there are the three deities Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Maheśvara (Śiva), but Brahmā and Maheśvara are qualitative expansions of Viṣṇu. Viṣṇu is the central figure. Therefore He takes charge of maintenance. No one can maintain the whole creation but Him. There are innumerable entities, and they have innumerable demands; no one but Viṣṇu can fulfill the innumerable demands of all the innumerable living entities. Brahmā is ordered to create, and Śiva is ordered to annihilate. The middle function, maintenance, is taken charge of by Viṣṇu. Kardama Muni knew very well, by his power in progressive spiritual life, that Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead, was his worshipable Deity. Whatever Viṣṇu desired was his duty, and nothing else. He was not prepared to beget a number of children. He would beget only one child, who would help the mission of Viṣṇu. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, whenever there is a discrepancy in the discharge of religious principles, the Lord descends to the surface of the earth to protect religious principles and to annihilate the miscreants.

Marrying and begetting a child is considered to liquidate one’s debts to the family in which one is born. There are many debts which are imposed upon a child just after his birth. There are debts to the family in which one is born, debts to the demigods, debts to the Pitās, debts to the ṛṣis, etc. But if someone engages only in the service of the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, who is actually worshipable, then even without trying to liquidate other debts, one becomes free from all obligations. Kardama Muni preferred to devote his life as a servant of the Lord in paramahaṁsa knowledge and to beget a child only for that purpose, not to beget numberless children to fill up the vacancies in the universe.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The infinite Lord, the father of my father and others, from whom the variegated universe arises, in whom it abides, and within whom it merges at destruction, is my final authority. The authority for this is the Lord alone, who arises in the memory of you and me. Or this is response to the objection, “You father’s order was procreation, not renunciation.” Saṁsthāsyate means “is destroyed.” Vāva means certainly. The father of my father and others, the Lord, is the final authority. I will follow his order alone, and not my father’s order.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.21

↗
మైత్రేయ ఉవాచ స ఉగ్రధన్వన్నియదేవాబభాషే ఆసీచ్చ తూష్ణీమరవిన్దనాభమ్ । ధియోపగృహ్ణన్ స్మితశోభితేన ముఖేన చేతో లులుభే దేవహూత్యా: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
maitreya uvāca
[maitreya uvaacha]
sa ugra-dhanvann iyad evābabhāṣe
[sa ugra-dhanvann iyad evaababhaashe]
āsīc ca tūṣṇīm aravinda-nābham
[aaseech cha tooshneem aravinda-naabham]
dhiyopagṛhṇan smita-śobhitena
[dhiyopagrihnan smita-shobhitena]
mukhena ceto lulubhe devahūtyāḥ
[mukhena cheto lulubhe devahootyaah]
maitreyaḥ — the great sage Maitreya uvāca — said saḥ — he (Kardama) ugra-dhanvan — O great warrior Vidura iyat — this much eva — only ābabhāṣe — spoke āsīt — became ca — and tūṣṇīm — silent aravinda-nābham — Lord Viṣṇu (whose navel is adorned by a lotus) dhiyā — by thought upagṛhṇan — seizing smita-śobhitena — beautified by his smile mukhena — by his face cetaḥ — the mind lulubhe — was captivated devahūtyāḥ — of Devahūti.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maitreya uvāca
maitreyaḥ
the great sage Maitreya
uvāca
said
sa ugra-dhanvann iyad evābabhāṣe
saḥ
he (Kardama)
ugra-dhanvan
O great warrior Vidura
iyat
this much
eva
only
ābabhāṣe
spoke
āsīc ca tūṣṇīm aravinda-nābham
āsīt
became
ca
and
tūṣṇīm
silent
aravinda-nābham
Lord Viṣṇu (whose navel is adorned by a lotus)
dhiyopagṛhṇan smita-śobhitena
dhiyā
by thought
upagṛhṇan
seizing
smita-śobhitena
beautified by his smile
mukhena ceto lulubhe devahūtyāḥ
mukhena
by his face
cetaḥ
the mind
lulubhe
was captivated
devahūtyāḥ
of Devahūti.
Śrī Maitreya said: O great warrior Vidura, the sage Kardama said this much only and then became silent, thinking of his worshipable Lord Viṣṇu, who has a lotus on His navel. As he silently smiled, his face captured the mind of Devahūti, who began to meditate upon the great sage.

It appears that Kardama Muni was fully absorbed in Kṛṣṇa consciousness because as soon as he became silent, he at once began to think of Lord Viṣṇu. That is the way of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Pure devotees are so absorbed in thought of Kṛṣṇa that they have no other engagement; although they may seem to think or act otherwise, they are always thinking of Kṛṣṇa. The smile of such a Kṛṣṇa conscious person is so attractive that simply by smiling he wins so many admirers, disciples and followers.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Maitreya said: O fierce warrior Vidura! Having said only that much, Kardama became silent. When he fixed his mind on the Lord with lotus navel, his heart became attracted to the smiling face of Devahūti. O fierce warrior Vidura! Just as a warrior like you does not turn from battle, Kardama does not turn from the dharma recommended by the Lord. The mind of Kardama became attracted by the smiling face of Devahūti. From this it is understood the Manu and his wife did not feel regret, lamenting that they had given their daughter to a renounced person.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.22

↗
సోఽనుజ్ఞాత్వా వ్యవసితం మహిష్యా దుహితు: స్ఫుటమ్ । తస్మై గుణగణాఢ్యాయ దదౌ తుల్యాం ప్రహర్షిత: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
so ’nu jṣātvā vyavasitaṁ
[so ’nu jshaatvaa vyavasitam]
mahiṣyā duhituḥ sphuṭam
[mahishyaa duhituh sphutam]
tasmai guṇa-gaṇāḍhyāya
[tasmai guna-ganaadhyaaya]
dadau tulyāṁ praharṣitaḥ
[dadau tulyaam praharshitah]
saḥ — he (Emperor Manu) anu — afterward jṣātvā — having known vyavasitam — the fixed decision mahiṣyāḥ — of the Queen duhituḥ — of his daughter sphuṭam — clearly tasmai — to him guṇa-gaṇa-āḍhyāya — who was endowed with a host of virtues dadau — gave away tulyām — who was equal (in good qualities) praharṣitaḥ — extremely pleased.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’nu jṣātvā vyavasitaṁ
saḥ
he (Emperor Manu)
mahiṣyā duhituḥ sphuṭam
tasmai guṇa-gaṇāḍhyāya
anu
afterward
jṣātvā
having known
vyavasitam
the fixed decision
mahiṣyāḥ
of the Queen
duhituḥ
of his daughter
sphuṭam
clearly
dadau tulyāṁ praharṣitaḥ
tasmai
to him
guṇa-gaṇa-āḍhyāya
who was endowed with a host of virtues
dadau
gave away
tulyām
who was equal (in good qualities)
praharṣitaḥ
extremely pleased.
After having unmistakably known the decision of the Queen, as well as that of Devahūti, the Emperor most gladly gave his daughter to the sage, whose host of virtues was equaled by hers.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After that, Manu, clearly understanding the desire of his queen and his daughter, gladly gave to Kardama, a reservoir of good qualities, his daughter of equal qualities. After that (anu) understanding the desires (vyavasitam) of his daughter Devahūti and the queen, her mother, Manu gave her to Kardama.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.23

↗
శతరూపా మహారాజ్ఞీ పారిబర్హాన్మహాధనాన్ । దమ్పత్యో: పర్యదాత్ప్రీత్యా భూషావాస: పరిచ్ఛదాన్ ॥ ౨౩ ॥
śatarūpā mahā-rājṣī
[shataroopaa mahaa-raajshee]
pāribarhān mahā-dhanān
[paaribarhaan mahaa-dhanaan]
dampatyoḥ paryadāt prītyā
[dampatyoh paryadaat preetyaa]
bhūṣā-vāsaḥ paricchadān
[bhooshaa-vaasah parichchadaan]
śatarūpā — Empress Śatarūpā mahā-rājṣī — the Empress pāribarhān — dowry mahā-dhanān — valuable presents dam-patyoḥ — to the bride and bridegroom paryadāt — gave prītyā — out of affection bhūṣā — ornaments vāsaḥ — clothes paricchadān — articles for household use.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śatarūpā mahā-rājṣī
śatarūpā
Empress Śatarūpā
mahā-rājṣī
the Empress
pāribarhān mahā-dhanān
pāribarhān
dowry
mahā-dhanān
valuable presents
dampatyoḥ paryadāt prītyā
dam-patyoḥ
to the bride and bridegroom
paryadāt
gave
prītyā
out of affection
bhūṣā-vāsaḥ paricchadān
bhūṣā
ornaments
vāsaḥ
clothes
paricchadān
articles for household use.
Empress Śatarūpā lovingly gave most valuable presents, suitable for the occasion, such as jewelry, clothes and household articles, in dowry to the bride and bridegroom.

The custom of giving one’s daughter in charity with a dowry is still current in India. The gifts are given according to the position of the father of the bride. Pāribarhān mahā-dhanān means the dowry which must be awarded to the bridegroom at the time of marriage. Here mahā-dhanān means greatly valuable gifts befitting the dowry of an empress. The words bhūṣā-vāsaḥ paricchadān also appear here. Bhūṣā means “ornaments,” vāsaḥ means “clothing,” and paricchadān means “various household articles.” All things befitting the marriage ceremony of an emperor’s daughter were awarded to Kardama Muni, who was until now observing celibacy as a brahmacārī. The bride, Devahūti, was very richly dressed with ornaments and clothing.

In this way Kardama Muni was married with full opulence to a qualified wife and was endowed with the necessary paraphernalia for household life. In the Vedic way of marriage such a dowry is still given to the bridegroom by the father of the bride; even in poverty-stricken India there are marriages where hundreds and thousands of rupees are spent for a dowry. The dowry system is not illegal, as some have tried to prove. The dowry is a gift given to the daughter by the father to show good will, and it is compulsory. In rare cases where the father is completely unable to give a dowry, it is enjoined that he must at least give a fruit and a flower. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, God can also be pleased even by a fruit and a flower. When there is financial inability and no question of accumulating a dowry by another means, one can give a fruit and flower for the satisfaction of the bridegroom.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The queen Śatarūpā affectionately gave the couple great wealth, and gifts suitable for a wedding, as well as ornaments, clothing and furniture. Pāribarhān means gifts of great value, suitable for a wedding.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.24

↗
ప్రత్తాం దుహితరం సమ్రాట్ సద‍ృక్షాయ గతవ్యథ: । ఉపగుహ్య చ బాహుభ్యామౌత్కణ్ఠ్యోన్మథితాశయ: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
prattāṁ duhitaraṁ samrāṭ
[prattaam duhitaram samraat]
sadṛkṣāya gata-vyathaḥ
[sadrikshaaya gata-vyathah]
upaguhya ca bāhubhyām
[upaguhya cha baahubhyaam]
autkaṇṭhyonmathitāśayaḥ
[autkanthyonmathitaashayah]
prattām — who was given duhitaram — daughter samrāṭ — the Emperor (Manu) sadṛkṣāya — unto a suitable person gata-vyathaḥ — relieved of his responsibility upaguhya — embracing ca — and bāhubhyām — with his two arms autkaṇṭhya-unmathita-āśayaḥ — having an anxious and agitated mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prattāṁ duhitaraṁ samrāṭ
prattām
who was given
duhitaram
daughter
samrāṭ
the Emperor (Manu)
sadṛkṣāya gata-vyathaḥ
sadṛkṣāya
unto a suitable person
gata-vyathaḥ
relieved of his responsibility
upaguhya ca bāhubhyām
upaguhya
embracing
ca
and
bāhubhyām
with his two arms
autkaṇṭhyonmathitāśayaḥ
autkaṇṭhya-unmathita-āśayaḥ
having an anxious and agitated mind.
Thus relieved of his responsibility by handing over his daughter to a suitable man, Svāyambhuva Manu, his mind agitated by feelings of separation, embraced his affectionate daughter with both his arms.

A father always remains in anxiety until he can hand over his grownup daughter to a suitable boy. A father and mother’s responsibility for children continues until they marry them to suitable spouses; when the father is able to perform that duty, he is relieved of his responsibility.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The King, relieved of his worries, but whose heart was filled with feelings of separation, embraced with his two arms his daughter who had been given to a groom of equal qualities. Prattām means given.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.25

↗
అశక్నువంస్తద్విరహం ముఞ్చన్ బాష్పకలాం ముహు: । ఆసిఞ్చదమ్బ వత్సేతి నేత్రోదైర్దుహితు: శిఖా: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
aśaknuvaṁs tad-virahaṁ
[ashaknuvams tad-viraham]
muṣcan bāṣpa-kalāṁ muhuḥ
[mushchan baashpa-kalaam muhuh]
āsiṣcad amba vatseti
[aasishchad amba vatseti]
netrodair duhituḥ śikhāḥ
[netrodair duhituh shikhaah]
aśaknuvan — being unable to bear tat-viraham — separation from her muṣcan — shedding bāṣpa-kalām — tears muhuḥ — again and again āsiṣcat — he drenched amba — my dear mother vatsa — my dear daughter iti — thus netra-udaiḥ — by the water from his eyes duhituḥ — of his daughter śikhāḥ — the locks of hair.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aśaknuvaṁs tad-virahaṁ
aśaknuvan
being unable to bear
tat-viraham
separation from her
muṣcan bāṣpa-kalāṁ muhuḥ
muṣcan
shedding
bāṣpa-kalām
tears
muhuḥ
again and again
āsiṣcad amba vatseti
āsiṣcat
he drenched
amba
my dear mother
vatsa
my dear daughter
netrodair duhituḥ śikhāḥ
iti
thus
netra-udaiḥ
by the water from his eyes
duhituḥ
of his daughter
śikhāḥ
the locks of hair.
The Emperor was unable to bear the separation of his daughter. Therefore tears poured from his eyes again and again, drenching his daughter’s head as he cried, “My dear mother! My dear daughter!”

The word amba is significant. A father sometimes addresses his daughter in affection as “mother” and sometimes as “my darling.” The feeling of separation occurs because until the daughter is married she remains the daughter of the father, but after her marriage she is no longer claimed as a daughter in the family; she must go to the husband’s house, for after marriage she becomes the property of the husband. According to Manu-saṁhitā, a woman is never independent. She must remain the property of the father while she is not married, and she must remain the property of the husband until she is elderly and has grown-up children of her own. In old age, when the husband has taken sannyāsa and left home, she remains the property of the sons. A woman is always dependent, either upon the father, husband or elderly sons. That will be exhibited in the life of Devahūti. Devahūti’s father handed over responsibility for her to the husband, Kardama Muni, and in the same way, Kardama Muni also left home, giving the responsibility to his son, Kapiladeva. This narration will describe these events one after another.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Unable to bear separation from his daughter, continuously shedding tears, he moistened the hair of his daughter with his tears. “O mother! O daughter!” he cried. He cried out, “O dear daughter (vatsa).”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.26-27

↗
ఆమన్‍త్ర్‍య తం మునివరమనుజ్ఞాత: సహానుగ: । ప్రతస్థే రథమారుహ్య సభార్య: స్వపురం నృప: ॥ ౨౬ ॥ ఉభయోఋర్షికుల్యాయా: సరస్వత్యా: సురోధసో: । ఋషీణాముపశాన్తానాం పశ్యన్నాశ్రమసమ్పద: ॥ ౨౭ ॥
āmantrya taṁ muni-varam
[aamantrya tam muni-varam]
anujṣātaḥ sahānugaḥ
[anujshaatah sahaanugah]
pratasthe ratham āruhya
[pratasthe ratham aaruhya]
sabhāryaḥ sva-puraṁ nṛpaḥ
[sabhaaryah sva-puram nripah]
ubhayor ṛṣi-kulyāyāḥ
[ubhayor rishi-kulyaayaah]
sarasvatyāḥ surodhasoḥ
[sarasvatyaah surodhasoh]
ṛṣīṇām upaśāntānāṁ
[risheenaam upashaantaanaam]
paśyann āśrama-sampadaḥ
[pashyann aashrama-sampadah]
āmantrya — taking permission to go tam — from him (Kardama) muni-varam — from the best of sages anujṣātaḥ — being permitted to leave saha-anugaḥ — along with his retinue pratasthe — started for ratham āruhya — mounting his chariot sa-bhāryaḥ — along with his wife sva-puram — his own capital nṛpaḥ — the Emperor ubhayoḥ — on both ṛṣi-kulyāyāḥ — agreeable to the sages sarasvatyāḥ — of the river Sarasvatī su-rodhasoḥ — the charming banks ṛṣīṇām — of the great sages upaśāntānām — tranquil paśyan — seeing āśrama-sampadaḥ — the prosperity of the beautiful hermitages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āmantrya taṁ muni-varam
āmantrya
taking permission to go
tam
from him (Kardama)
muni-varam
from the best of sages
anujṣātaḥ sahānugaḥ
anujṣātaḥ
being permitted to leave
saha-anugaḥ
along with his retinue
pratasthe ratham āruhya
pratasthe
started for
ratham āruhya
mounting his chariot
sabhāryaḥ sva-puraṁ nṛpaḥ
sa-bhāryaḥ
along with his wife
sva-puram
his own capital
nṛpaḥ
the Emperor
ubhayor ṛṣi-kulyāyāḥ
ubhayoḥ
on both
ṛṣi-kulyāyāḥ
agreeable to the sages
sarasvatyāḥ surodhasoḥ
sarasvatyāḥ
of the river Sarasvatī
su-rodhasoḥ
the charming banks
ṛṣīṇām upaśāntānāṁ
ṛṣīṇām
of the great sages
upaśāntānām
tranquil
paśyann āśrama-sampadaḥ
paśyan
seeing
āśrama-sampadaḥ
the prosperity of the beautiful hermitages.
After asking and obtaining the great sage’s permission to leave, the monarch mounted his chariot with his wife and started for his capital, followed by his retinue. Along the way he saw the prosperity of the tranquil seers’ beautiful hermitages on both the charming banks of the Sarasvatī, the river so agreeable to saintly persons.

As cities are constructed in the modern age with great engineering and architectural craftsmanship, so in days gone by there were neighborhoods called ṛṣi-kulas, where great saintly persons resided. In India there are still many magnificent places for spiritual understanding; there are many ṛṣis and saintly persons living in nice cottages on the banks of the Ganges and Yamunā for purposes of spiritual cultivation. While passing through the ṛṣi-kulas the King and his party were very much satisfied with the beauty of the cottages and hermitages. It is stated here, paśyann āśrama-sampadaḥ. The great sages had no skyscrapers, but the hermitages were so beautiful that the King was very much pleased at the sight.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Taking permission from the great sage, the King and with his wife mounted his chariot and arrived at his city along with his retinue.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.28

↗
తమాయాన్తమభిప్రేత్య బ్రహ్మావర్తాత్ప్రజా: పతిమ్ । గీతసంస్తుతివాదిత్రై: ప్రత్యుదీయు: ప్రహర్షితా: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
tam āyāntam abhipretya
[tam aayaantam abhipretya]
brahmāvartāt prajāḥ patim
[brahmaavartaat prajaah patim]
gīta-saṁstuti-vāditraiḥ
[geeta-samstuti-vaaditraih]
pratyudīyuḥ praharṣitāḥ
[pratyudeeyuh praharshitaah]
tam — him āyāntam — who was arriving abhipretya — knowing of brahmāvartāt — from Brahmāvarta prajāḥ — his subjects patim — their lord gīta-saṁstuti-vāditraiḥ — with songs, praise and instrumental music pratyudīyuḥ — came forward to greet praharṣitāḥ — overjoyed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam āyāntam abhipretya
tam
him
āyāntam
who was arriving
abhipretya
knowing of
brahmāvartāt prajāḥ patim
brahmāvartāt
from Brahmāvarta
prajāḥ
his subjects
patim
their lord
gīta-saṁstuti-vāditraiḥ
gīta-saṁstuti-vāditraiḥ
with songs, praise and instrumental music
pratyudīyuḥ praharṣitāḥ
pratyudīyuḥ
came forward to greet
praharṣitāḥ
overjoyed.
Overjoyed to know of his arrival, his subjects came forth from Brahmāvarta to greet their returning lord with songs, prayers and musical instruments.

It is the custom of the citizens of a kingdom’s capital to receive the king when he returns from a tour. There is a similar description when Kṛṣṇa returned to Dvārakā after the Battle of Kurukṣetra. At that time He was received by all classes of citizens at the gate of the city. Formerly, capital cities were surrounded by walls, and there were different gates for regular entrance. Even in Delhi today there are old gates, and some other old cities have such gates where citizens would gather to receive the king. Here also the citizens of Barhiṣmatī, the capital of Brahmāvarta, the kingdom of Svāyambhuva, came nicely dressed to receive the Emperor with decorations and musical instruments.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Knowing of his arrival, the joyful citizens came from Brahmāvarta to meet him with music, praises and songs. Pratyudīyuḥ means “came to greet.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.29-30

↗
బర్హిష్మతీ నామ పురీ సర్వసమ్పత్సమన్వితా । న్యపతన్ యత్ర రోమాణి యజ్ఞస్యాఙ్గం విధున్వత: ॥ ౨౯ ॥ కుశా: కాశాస్త ఏవాసన్ శశ్వద్ధరితవర్చస: । ఋషయో యై: పరాభావ్య యజ్ఞఘ్నాన్ యజ్ఞమీజిరే ॥ ౩౦ ॥
barhiṣmatī nāma purī
[barhishmatee naama puree]
sarva-sampat-samanvitā
[sarva-sampat-samanvitaa]
nyapatan yatra romāṇi
[nyapatan yatra romaani]
yajṣasyāṅgaṁ vidhunvataḥ
[yajshasyaangam vidhunvatah]
kuśāḥ kāśās ta evāsan
[kushaah kaashaas ta evaasan]
śaśvad-dharita-varcasaḥ
[shashvad-dharita-varchasah]
ṛṣayo yaiḥ parābhāvya
[rishayo yaih paraabhaavya]
yajṣa-ghnān yajṣam ījire
[yajsha-ghnaan yajsham eejire]
barhiṣmatī — Barhiṣmatī nāma — named purī — city sarva-sampat — all kinds of wealth samanvitā — full of nyapatan — fell down yatra — where romāṇi — the hairs yajṣasya — of Lord Boar aṅgam — His body vidhunvataḥ — shaking kuśāḥ — kuśa grass kāśāḥ — kāśa grass te — they eva — certainly āsan — became śaśvat-harita — of evergreen varcasaḥ — having the color ṛṣayaḥ — the sages yaiḥ — by which parābhāvya — defeating yajṣa-ghnān — the disturbers of the sacrificial performances yajṣam — Lord Viṣṇu ījire — they worshiped.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
barhiṣmatī nāma purī
barhiṣmatī
Barhiṣmatī
nāma
named
purī
city
sarva-sampat-samanvitā
sarva-sampat
all kinds of wealth
samanvitā
full of
nyapatan yatra romāṇi
nyapatan
fell down
yatra
where
romāṇi
the hairs
yajṣasyāṅgaṁ vidhunvataḥ
yajṣasya
of Lord Boar
aṅgam
His body
vidhunvataḥ
shaking
kuśāḥ kāśās ta evāsan
kuśāḥ
kuśa grass
kāśāḥ
kāśa grass
te
they
eva
certainly
āsan
became
śaśvad-dharita-varcasaḥ
śaśvat-harita
of evergreen
varcasaḥ
having the color
ṛṣayo yaiḥ parābhāvya
ṛṣayaḥ
the sages
yaiḥ
by which
parābhāvya
defeating
yajṣa-ghnān yajṣam ījire
yajṣa-ghnān
the disturbers of the sacrificial performances
yajṣam
Lord Viṣṇu
ījire
they worshiped.
The city of Barhiṣmatī, rich in all kinds of wealth, was so called because Lord Viṣṇu’s hair dropped there from His body when He manifested Himself as Lord Boar. As He shook His body, this very hair fell and turned into blades of evergreen kuśa grass and kāśa [another kind of grass used for mats], by means of which the sages worshiped Lord Viṣṇu after defeating the demons who had interfered with the performance of their sacrifices.

Any place directly connected with the Supreme Lord is called pīṭha-sthāna. Barhiṣmatī, the capital of Svāyambhuva Manu, was exalted not because the city was very rich in wealth and opulence, but because the hairs of Lord Varāha fell at this very spot. These hairs of the Lord later grew as green grass, and the sages used to worship the Lord with that grass after the time when the Lord killed the demon Hiraṇyākṣa. Yajṣa means Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In Bhagavad-gītā, karma is described as yajṣārtha. Yajṣārtha-karma means “work done only for the satisfaction of Viṣṇu.” If something is done for sense gratification or any other purpose, it will be binding upon the worker. If one wants to be freed from the reaction of his work, he must perform everything for the satisfaction of Viṣṇu, or Yajṣa. In the capital of Svāyambhuva Manu, Barhiṣmatī, these particular functions were being performed by the great sages and saintly persons.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The city of Barhiṣmatī, filled with all wealth, was where the hairs of the boar avatāra fell when he shook his wet body. The hairs which fell became kuśa and kāśa grass which are always green. With that grass the sages worship the Lord after defeating the demons who oppose sacrifice. What was Brahmāvarta like? In that place there was the city of Barhiṣmatī, where the hairs of Varāha fell. This verse explains the meaning of the city Barhiṣmati (filled with kuśa grass). The hairs remained as kuśa and kāśa grass.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.31

↗
కుశకాశమయం బర్హిరాస్తీర్య భగవాన్మను: । అయజద్యజ్ఞపురుషం లబ్ధా స్థానం యతో భువమ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
kuśa-kāśamayaṁ barhir
[kusha-kaashamayam barhir]
āstīrya bhagavān manuḥ
[aasteerya bhagavaan manuh]
ayajad yajṣa-puruṣaṁ
[ayajad yajsha-purusham]
labdhā sthānaṁ yato bhuvam
[labdhaa sthaanam yato bhuvam]
kuśa — of kuśa grass kāśa — and of kāśa grass mayam — made barhiḥ — a seat āstīrya — having spread bhagavān — the greatly fortunate manuḥ — Svāyambhuva Manu ayajat — worshiped yajṣa-puruṣam — Lord Viṣṇu labdhā — had achieved sthānam — the abode yataḥ — from whom bhuvam — the earth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kuśa-kāśamayaṁ barhir
kuśa
of kuśa grass
kāśa
and of kāśa grass
mayam
made
barhiḥ
a seat
āstīrya bhagavān manuḥ
āstīrya
having spread
bhagavān
the greatly fortunate
manuḥ
Svāyambhuva Manu
ayajad yajṣa-puruṣaṁ
ayajat
worshiped
yajṣa-puruṣam
Lord Viṣṇu
labdhā sthānaṁ yato bhuvam
labdhā
had achieved
sthānam
the abode
yataḥ
from whom
bhuvam
the earth.
Manu spread a seat of kuśas and kāśas and worshiped the Lord, the Personality of Godhead, by whose grace he had obtained the rule of the terrestrial globe.

Manu is the father of mankind, and therefore from manu comes the word man, or, in Sanskrit, manuṣya. Those who are in a better position in the world, having sufficient wealth, should especially take lessons from Manu, who acknowledged his kingdom and opulence to be gifts from the Supreme Personality of Godhead and thus always engaged in devotional service. Similarly, the descendants of Manu, or human beings, especially those who are situated in a well-to-do condition, must consider that whatever riches they have are gifts from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Those riches should be utilized for the service of the Lord in sacrifices performed to please Him. That is the way of utilizing wealth and opulence. No one can achieve wealth, opulence, good birth, a beautiful body or nice education without the mercy of the Supreme Lord. Therefore, those who are in possession of such valuable facilities must acknowledge their gratefulness to the Lord by worshiping Him and offering what they have received from Him. When such acknowledgment is given, either by a family, nation or society, their abode becomes almost like Vaikuṇṭha, and it becomes free from the operation of the threefold miseries of this material world. In the modern age the mission of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is for everyone to acknowledge the supremacy of Lord Kṛṣṇa; whatever one has in his possession must be considered a gift by the grace of the Lord. Therefore everyone should engage in devotional service through Kṛṣṇa consciousness. If one wants to be happy and peaceful in his position, either as a householder or citizen or member of human society, one must promote devotional service for the pleasure of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this place, spreading kuśa and kāśa grass, the great Manu worshipped the Supreme Lord, after attaining the earth to rule. Barhis refers to both kuśa and kāśa. He attained (labdhā) the earth to rule.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.32

↗
బర్హిష్మతీం నామ విభుర్యాం నిర్విశ్య సమావసత్ । తస్యాం ప్రవిష్టో భవనం తాపత్రయవినాశనమ్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
barhiṣmatīṁ nāma vibhur
[barhishmateem naama vibhur]
yāṁ nirviśya samāvasat
[yaam nirvishya samaavasat]
tasyāṁ praviṣṭo bhavanaṁ
[tasyaam pravishto bhavanam]
tāpa-traya-vināśanam
[taapa-traya-vinaashanam]
barhiṣmatīm — the city Barhiṣmatī nāma — named vibhuḥ — the very powerful Svāyambhuva Manu yām — which nirviśya — having entered samāvasat — he lived in previously tasyām — in that city praviṣṭaḥ — entered bhavanam — the palace tāpa-traya — the threefold miseries vināśanam — destroying.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
barhiṣmatīṁ nāma vibhur
barhiṣmatīm
the city Barhiṣmatī
nāma
named
vibhuḥ
the very powerful Svāyambhuva Manu
yāṁ nirviśya samāvasat
yām
which
nirviśya
having entered
samāvasat
he lived in previously
tasyāṁ praviṣṭo bhavanaṁ
tasyām
in that city
praviṣṭaḥ
entered
bhavanam
the palace
tāpa-traya-vināśanam
tāpa-traya
the threefold miseries
vināśanam
destroying.
Having entered the city of Barhiṣmatī, in which he had previously lived, Manu entered his palace, which was filled with an atmosphere that eradicated the three miseries of material existence.

The material world, or material existential life, is filled with threefold miseries: miseries pertaining to the body and mind, miseries pertaining to natural disturbances and miseries inflicted by other living entities. Human society is meant to create a spiritual atmosphere by spreading the spirit of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The miseries of material existence cannot affect the status of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. It is not that the miseries of the material world completely vanish when one takes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, but for one who is Kṛṣṇa conscious the miseries of material existence have no effect. We cannot stop the miseries of the material atmosphere, but Kṛṣṇa consciousness is the antiseptic method to protect us from being affected by the miseries of material existence. For a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, both living in heaven and living in hell are equal. How Svāyambhuva Manu created an atmosphere wherein he was not affected by material miseries is explained in the following verses.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Entering the city of Bariṣmatī in which he had previously lived, Manu the entered his palace which destroys the three miseries. This verse returns to the main topic. First entering the city in which he had previously lived (samāvasat), he then entered the palace.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.33

↗
సభార్య: సప్రజ: కామాన్ బుభుజేఽన్యావిరోధత: । సఙ్గీయమానసత్కీర్తి: సస్త్రీభి: సురగాయకై: । ప్రత్యూషేష్వనుబద్ధేన హృదా శ‍ృణ్వన్ హరే: కథా: ॥ ౩౩ ॥
sabhāryaḥ saprajaḥ kāmān
[sabhaaryah saprajah kaamaan]
bubhuje ’nyāvirodhataḥ
[bubhuje ’nyaavirodhatah]
saṅgīyamāna-sat-kīrtiḥ
[sangeeyamaana-sat-keertih]
sastrībhiḥ sura-gāyakaiḥ
[sastreebhih sura-gaayakaih]
praty-ūṣeṣv anubaddhena
[praty-oosheshv anubaddhena]
hṛdā śṛṇvan hareḥ kathāḥ
[hridaa shrinvan hareh kathaah]
sa-bhāryaḥ — along with his wife sa-prajaḥ — along with his subjects kāmān — the necessities of life bubhuje — he enjoyed anya — from others avirodhataḥ — without disturbance saṅgīyamāna — being praised sat-kīrtiḥ — reputation for pious activities sa-strībhiḥ — along with their wives sura-gāyakaiḥ — by celestial musicians prati-ūṣeṣu — at every dawn anubaddhena — being attached hṛdā — with the heart śṛṇvan — listening to hareḥ — of Lord Hari kathāḥ — the topics.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sabhāryaḥ saprajaḥ kāmān
sa-bhāryaḥ
along with his wife
sa-prajaḥ
along with his subjects
kāmān
the necessities of life
bubhuje ’nyāvirodhataḥ
bubhuje
he enjoyed
saṅgīyamāna-sat-kīrtiḥ
anya
from others
avirodhataḥ
without disturbance
saṅgīyamāna
being praised
sastrībhiḥ sura-gāyakaiḥ
sat-kīrtiḥ
reputation for pious activities
sa-strībhiḥ
along with their wives
sura-gāyakaiḥ
by celestial musicians
praty-ūṣeṣv anubaddhena
prati-ūṣeṣu
at every dawn
anubaddhena
being attached
hṛdā śṛṇvan hareḥ kathāḥ
hṛdā
with the heart
śṛṇvan
listening to
hareḥ
of Lord Hari
kathāḥ
the topics.
Emperor Svāyambhuva Manu enjoyed life with his wife and subjects and fulfilled his desires without being disturbed by unwanted principles contrary to the process of religion. Celestial musicians and their wives sang in chorus about the pure reputation of the Emperor, and early in the morning, every day, he used to listen to the pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead with a loving heart.

Human society is actually meant for realization of perfection in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. There is no restriction against living with a wife and children, but life should be so conducted that one may not go against the principles of religion, economic development, regulated sense enjoyment and, ultimately, liberation from material existence. The Vedic principles are designed in such a way that the conditioned souls who have come to this material existence may be guided in fulfilling their material desires and at the same time be liberated and go back to Godhead, back home.

It is understood that Emperor Svāyambhuva Manu enjoyed his household life by following these principles. It is stated here that early in the morning there were musicians who used to sing with musical instruments about the glories of the Lord, and the Emperor, with his family, personally used to hear about the pastimes of the Supreme Person. This custom is still prevalent in India in some of the royal families and temples. Professional musicians sing with śahnāīs, and the sleeping members of the house gradually get up from their beds in a pleasing atmosphere. During bedtime also the singers sing songs in relationship with the pastimes of the Lord, with śahnāī accompaniment, and the householders gradually fall asleep remembering the glories of the Lord. In every house, in addition to the singing program, there is an arrangement for Bhāgavatam lectures in the evening; family members sit down, hold Hare Kṛṣṇa kīrtana, hear narrations from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Bhagavad-gītā and enjoy music before going to bed. The atmosphere created by this saṅkīrtana movement lives in their hearts, and while sleeping they also dream of the singing and glorification of the Lord. In such a way, perfection of Kṛṣṇa consciousness can be attained. This practice is very old, as learned from this verse of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam; millions of years ago, Svāyambhuva Manu used to avail himself of this opportunity to live householder life in the peace and prosperity of a Kṛṣṇa consciousness atmosphere.

As far as temples are concerned, in each and every royal palace or rich man’s house, inevitably there is a nice temple, and the members of the household rise early in the morning and go to the temple to see the maṅgala-ārati ceremony. The maṅgala-ārati ceremony is the first worship of the morning. In the ārati ceremony a light is offered in circles before the Deities, as are a conchshell and flowers and a fan. The Lord is supposed to rise early in the morning and take some light refreshment and give audience to the devotees. The devotees then go back to the house or sing the glories of the Lord in the temple. The early morning ceremony still takes place in Indian temples and palaces. Temples are meant for the assembly of the general public. Temples within palaces are especially for the royal families, but in many of these palace temples the public is also allowed to visit. The temple of the King of Jaipur is situated within the palace, but the public is allowed to assemble; if one goes there, he will see that the temple is always crowded with at least five hundred devotees. After the maṅgala-ārati ceremony they sit down together and sing the glories of the Lord with musical instruments and thus enjoy life. Temple worship by the royal family is also mentioned in Bhagavad-gītā, where it is stated that those who fail to achieve success in the bhakti-yoga principles within one life are given a chance to take birth in the next life in a family of rich men or in a royal family or family of learned brāhmaṇas or devotees. If one gets the opportunity to take birth in these families, he can achieve the facilities of a Kṛṣṇa conscious atmosphere without difficulty. A child born in that Kṛṣṇa atmosphere is sure to develop Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The perfection which he failed to attain in his last life is again offered in this life, and he can make himself perfect without fail.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He enjoyed with his wife and citizens, without contradicting the dharma of others. While his glories were sung by the Gandharvas with their wives, starting in the morning, he would listen with attention to stories of the Lord. He did not contradict others duties. Starting at every dawn (pratyuṣeṣu), he listened with heart controlled (anubaddhena) by the sweetness of the stories of the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.34

↗
నిష్ణాతం యోగమాయాసు మునిం స్వాయమ్భువం మనుమ్ । యదాభ్రంశయితుం భోగా న శేకుర్భగవత్పరమ్ ॥ ౩౪ ॥
niṣṇātaṁ yoga-māyāsu
[nishnaatam yoga-maayaasu]
muniṁ svāyambhuvaṁ manum
[munim svaayambhuvam manum]
yad ābhraṁśayituṁ bhogā
[yad aabhramshayitum bhogaa]
na śekur bhagavat-param
[na shekur bhagavat-param]
niṣṇātam — absorbed yoga-māyāsu — in temporary enjoyment munim — who was equal to a saint svāyambhuvam — Svāyambhuva manum — Manu yat — from which ābhraṁśayitum — to cause to deviate bhogāḥ — material enjoyments na — not śekuḥ — were able bhagavat-param — who was a great devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
niṣṇātaṁ yoga-māyāsu
niṣṇātam
absorbed
yoga-māyāsu
in temporary enjoyment
muniṁ svāyambhuvaṁ manum
munim
who was equal to a saint
svāyambhuvam
Svāyambhuva
manum
Manu
yad ābhraṁśayituṁ bhogā
yat
from which
ābhraṁśayitum
to cause to deviate
bhogāḥ
material enjoyments
na śekur bhagavat-param
na
not
śekuḥ
were able
bhagavat-param
who was a great devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Thus Svāyambhuva Manu was a saintly king. Although absorbed in material happiness, he was not dragged to the lowest grade of life, for he always enjoyed his material happiness in a Kṛṣṇa conscious atmosphere.

The kingly happiness of material enjoyment generally drags one to the lowest grade of life, namely degradation to animal life, because of unrestricted sense enjoyment. But Svāyambhuva Manu was considered as good as a saintly sage because the atmosphere created in his kingdom and home was completely Kṛṣṇa conscious. The case is similar with the conditioned souls in general; they have come into this material life for sense gratification, but if they are able to create a Kṛṣṇa conscious atmosphere, as depicted here or as prescribed in revealed scriptures, by temple worship and household Deity worship, then in spite of their material enjoyment they can make advancement in pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness without a doubt. At the present moment, modern civilization is too much attached to the material way of life, or sense gratification. Therefore, the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement can give the people in general the best opportunity to utilize their human life in the midst of material enjoyment. Kṛṣṇa consciousness does not stop them in their propensity for material enjoyment, but simply regulates their habits in the life of sense enjoyment. In spite of their enjoying the material advantages, they can be liberated in this very life by practicing Kṛṣṇa consciousness by the simple method of chanting the holy names of the Lord — Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Material enjoyment could not cause deviation in saintly Svāyambhuva Manu, who was surrendered to the Lord, because he was experienced in all types of material enjoyment by yoga practice. By practice of aṣṭāṅga-yoga he was master of all types of knowledge of māyā (yogamāyāsu niṣnātam). Since he had experience of enjoying material objects, even the enjoyment of those objects could not produce attachment for them in him.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.35

↗
అయాతయామాస్తస్యాసన్ యామా:స్వాన్తరయాపనా: । శ‍ృణ్వతో ధ్యాయతో విష్ణో: కుర్వతో బ్రువత: కథా: ॥ ౩౫ ॥
ayāta-yāmās tasyāsan
[ayaata-yaamaas tasyaasan]
yāmāḥ svāntara-yāpanāḥ
[yaamaah svaantara-yaapanaah]
śṛṇvato dhyāyato viṣṇoḥ
[shrinvato dhyaayato vishnoh]
kurvato bruvataḥ kathāḥ
[kurvato bruvatah kathaah]
ayāta-yāmāḥ — time never lost tasya — of Manu āsan — were yāmāḥ — the hours sva-antara — his duration of life yāpanāḥ — bringing to an end śṛṇvataḥ — hearing dhyāyataḥ — contemplating viṣṇoḥ — of Lord Viṣṇu kurvataḥ — acting bruvataḥ — speaking kathāḥ — the topics.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ayāta-yāmās tasyāsan
ayāta-yāmāḥ
time never lost
tasya
of Manu
āsan
were
yāmāḥ svāntara-yāpanāḥ
yāmāḥ
the hours
sva-antara
his duration of life
yāpanāḥ
bringing to an end
śṛṇvato dhyāyato viṣṇoḥ
śṛṇvataḥ
hearing
dhyāyataḥ
contemplating
viṣṇoḥ
of Lord Viṣṇu
kurvato bruvataḥ kathāḥ
kurvataḥ
acting
bruvataḥ
speaking
kathāḥ
the topics.
Consequently, although his duration of life gradually came to an end, his long life, consisting of a Manvantara era, was not spent in vain, since he ever engaged in hearing, contemplating, writing down and chanting the pastimes of the Lord.

As freshly prepared food is very tasteful but if kept for three or four hours becomes stale and tasteless, so the existence of material enjoyment can endure as long as life is fresh, but at the fag end of life everything becomes tasteless, and everything appears to be vain and painful. The life of Emperor Svāyambhuva Manu, however, was not tasteless; as he grew older, his life remained as fresh as in the beginning because of his continued Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The life of a man in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always fresh. It is said that the sun rises in the morning and sets in the evening and its business is to reduce the duration of everyone’s life. But the sunrise and sunset cannot diminish the life of one who engages in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Svāyambhuva Manu’s life did not become stale after some time, for he engaged himself always in chanting about and meditating upon Lord Viṣṇu. He was the greatest yogī because he never wasted his time. It is especially mentioned here, viṣṇoḥ kurvato bruvataḥ kathāḥ. When he talked, he talked only of Kṛṣṇa and Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead; when he heard something, it was about Kṛṣṇa; when he meditated, it was upon Kṛṣṇa and His activities.

It is stated that his life was very long, seventy-one yugas. One yuga is completed in 4,320,000 years, seventy-one of such yugas is the duration of the life of a Manu, and fourteen such Manus come and go in one day of Brahma. For the entire duration of his life — 4,320,000 × 71 years — Manu engaged in Kṛṣṇa consciousness by chanting, hearing, talking about and meditating upon Kṛṣṇa. Therefore, his life was not wasted, nor did it become stale.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Since he heard about the Lord, meditated on him, spoke about him and made compositions with his words about him, his passing of time, extending for a Manvantara, was not in vain. His hours, extending over a whole Manavantara period, were not in vain (ayātayāmā). Amara-koṣa says yātayāman means worn out or decayed. Kurvataḥ means he made compositions in his own words about what he had seen, heard and spoken.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.36

↗
స ఏవం స్వాన్తరం నిన్యే యుగానామేకసప్తతిమ్ । వాసుదేవప్రసఙ్గేన పరిభూతగతిత్రయ: ॥ ౩౬ ॥
sa evaṁ svāntaraṁ ninye
[sa evam svaantaram ninye]
yugānām eka-saptatim
[yugaanaam eka-saptatim]
vāsudeva-prasaṅgena
[vaasudeva-prasangena]
paribhūta-gati-trayaḥ
[paribhoota-gati-trayah]
saḥ — he (Svāyambhuva Manu) evam — thus sva-antaram — his own period ninye — passed yugānām — of the cycles of four ages eka-saptatim — seventy-one vāsudeva — with Vāsudeva prasaṅgena — by topics connected paribhūta — transcended gati-trayaḥ — the three destinations.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa evaṁ svāntaraṁ ninye
saḥ
he (Svāyambhuva Manu)
evam
thus
sva-antaram
his own period
ninye
passed
yugānām eka-saptatim
yugānām
of the cycles of four ages
eka-saptatim
seventy-one
vāsudeva-prasaṅgena
vāsudeva
with Vāsudeva
prasaṅgena
by topics connected
paribhūta-gati-trayaḥ
paribhūta
transcended
gati-trayaḥ
the three destinations.
He passed his time, which lasted seventy-one cycles of the four ages [71 × 4,320,000 years], always thinking of Vāsudeva and always engaged in matters regarding Vāsudeva. Thus he transcended the three destinations.

The three destinations are meant for persons who are under the control of the three modes of material nature. These destinations are sometimes described as the awakened, dreaming and unconscious stages. In Bhagavad-gītā the three destinations are described as the destinations of persons in the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance. It is stated in the Gītā that those who are in the mode of goodness are promoted to better living conditions in higher planets, and those who are in the mode of passion remain within this material world on the earth or on heavenly planets, but those who are in the mode of ignorance are degraded to an animal life on planets where life is lower than human. But one who is Kṛṣṇa conscious is above these three modes of material nature. It is stated in Bhagavad-gītā that anyone who engages in devotional service to the Lord automatically becomes transcendental to the three destinations of material nature and is situated in the brahma-bhūta, or self-realized, stage. Although Svāyambhuva Manu, the ruler of this material world, appeared to be absorbed in material happiness, he was neither in the mode of goodness nor in the modes of passion or ignorance, but in the transcendental stage.

Therefore one who fully engages in devotional service is always liberated. Bilvamaṅgala Ṭhākura, a great devotee of the Lord, stated, “If I have unflinching devotion to the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, then Mother Liberation is always engaged in my service. The complete perfection of material enjoyment, religion and economic development is at my command.” People are after dharma, artha, kāma and mokṣa. Generally they perform religious activities to achieve some material gain, and they engage in material activity for sense gratification. After being frustrated in material sense gratification, one wants to be liberated and become one with the Absolute Truth. These four principles form the transcendental path for the less intelligent. Those who are actually intelligent engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, not caring for these four principles of the transcendental method. They at once elevate themselves to the transcendental platform, which is above liberation. Liberation is not a very great achievement for a devotee, to say nothing of the results of ritualistic performances in religion, economic development or the materialistic life of sense gratification. Devotees do not care for these. They are situated always on the transcendental platform of the brahma-bhūta stage of self-realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having conquered the three miseries, he spent the Manvantara of seventy-one yuga cycles in hearing topics related to the Lord. Gati-trayam can refer to the states of waking sleeping and dreaming, to the three guṇas or to the three miseries.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.37

↗
శారీరా మానసా దివ్యా వైయాసే యే చ మానుషా: । భౌతికాశ్చ కథం క్లేశా బాధన్తే హరిసంశ్రయమ్ ॥ ౩౭ ॥
śārīrā mānasā divyā
[shaareeraa maanasaa divyaa]
vaiyāse ye ca mānuṣāḥ
[vaiyaase ye cha maanushaah]
bhautikāś ca kathaṁ kleśā
[bhautikaash cha katham kleshaa]
bādhante hari-saṁśrayam
[baadhante hari-samshrayam]
śārīrāḥ — pertaining to the body mānasāḥ — pertaining to the mind divyāḥ — pertaining to supernatural powers (demigods) vaiyāse — O Vidura ye — those ca — and mānuṣāḥ — pertaining to other men bhautikāḥ — pertaining to other living beings ca — and katham — how kleśāḥ — miseries bādhante — can trouble hari-saṁśrayam — one who has taken shelter of Lord Kṛṣṇa.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śārīrā mānasā divyā
śārīrāḥ
pertaining to the body
mānasāḥ
pertaining to the mind
divyāḥ
pertaining to supernatural powers (demigods)
vaiyāse ye ca mānuṣāḥ
vaiyāse
O Vidura
ye
those
ca
and
mānuṣāḥ
pertaining to other men
bhautikāś ca kathaṁ kleśā
bhautikāḥ
pertaining to other living beings
ca
and
katham
how
kleśāḥ
miseries
bādhante hari-saṁśrayam
bādhante
can trouble
hari-saṁśrayam
one who has taken shelter of Lord Kṛṣṇa.
Therefore, O Vidura, how can persons completely under the shelter of Lord Kṛṣṇa in devotional service be put into miseries pertaining to the body, the mind, nature, and other men and living creatures?

Every living entity within this material world is always afflicted by some kind of miseries, pertaining either to the body, the mind or natural disturbances. Distresses due to cold in winter and severe heat in summer always inflict miseries on the living entities in this material world, but one who has completely taken shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is in the transcendental stage; he is not disturbed by any miseries, either due to the body, the mind or natural disturbances of summer and winter. He is transcendental to all these miseries.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! How can miseries arising from the body, mind, ghosts, other humans, or natural conditions bind up a person who has taken shelter of the Lord? Bhakti is the cause of overcoming miseries. Divyā here means “coming from the intermediate sky, the place of ghosts.” Manuṣāḥ means those who take the role of enemies. Bhautikāḥ means influence of cold, heat etc. Vaiyāse means “O Vidura!”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.38

↗
య: పృష్టో మునిభి: ప్రాహ ధర్మాన్నానావిదాఞ్ఛుభాన్ । నృణాం వర్ణాశ్రమాణాం చ సర్వభూతహిత: సదా ॥ ౩౮ ॥
yaḥ pṛṣṭo munibhiḥ prāha
[yah prishto munibhih praaha]
dharmān nānā-vidhāṣ chubhān
[dharmaan naanaa-vidhaash chubhaan]
nṛṇāṁ varṇāśramāṇāṁ ca
[nrinaam varnaashramaanaam cha]
sarva-bhūta-hitaḥ sadā
[sarva-bhoota-hitah sadaa]
yaḥ — who pṛṣṭaḥ — being questioned munibhiḥ — by the sages prāha — spoke dharmān — the duties nānā-vidhān — many varieties śubhān — auspicious nṛṇām — of human society varṇa-āśramāṇām — of the varṇas and āśramas ca — and sarva-bhūta — for all living beings hitaḥ — who does welfare sadā — always.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ pṛṣṭo munibhiḥ prāha
yaḥ
who
pṛṣṭaḥ
being questioned
munibhiḥ
by the sages
prāha
spoke
dharmān nānā-vidhāṣ chubhān
dharmān
the duties
nānā-vidhān
many varieties
śubhān
auspicious
nṛṇāṁ varṇāśramāṇāṁ ca
nṛṇām
of human society
varṇa-āśramāṇām
of the varṇas and āśramas
ca
and
sarva-bhūta-hitaḥ sadā
sarva-bhūta
for all living beings
hitaḥ
who does welfare
sadā
always.
In reply to questions asked by certain sages, he [Svāyambhuva Manu], out of compassion for all living entities, taught the diverse sacred duties of men in general and the different varṇas and āśramas.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Asked by sages, he, thinking of the welfare of all beings, spoke on various types of auspicious dharma for humans and on varṇāśrama.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.22.39

↗
ఏతత్త ఆదిరాజస్య మనోశ్చరితమద్భుతమ్ । వర్ణితం వర్ణనీయస్య తదపత్యోదయం శ‍ృణు ॥ ౩౯ ॥
etat ta ādi-rājasya
[etat ta aadi-raajasya]
manoś caritam adbhutam
[manosh charitam adbhutam]
varṇitaṁ varṇanīyasya
[varnitam varnaneeyasya]
tad-apatyodayaṁ śṛṇu
[tad-apatyodayam shrinu]
etat — this te — unto you ādi-rājasya — of the first emperor manoḥ — of Svāyambhuva Manu caritam — the character adbhutam — wonderful varṇitam — described varṇanīyasya — whose reputation is worthy of description tat-apatya — of his daughter udayam — to the flourishing śṛṇu — please listen.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etat ta ādi-rājasya
etat
this
te
unto you
ādi-rājasya
of the first emperor
manoś caritam adbhutam
manoḥ
of Svāyambhuva Manu
caritam
the character
adbhutam
wonderful
varṇitaṁ varṇanīyasya
varṇitam
described
varṇanīyasya
whose reputation is worthy of description
tad-apatyodayaṁ śṛṇu
tat-apatya
of his daughter
udayam
to the flourishing
śṛṇu
please listen.
I have spoken to you of the wonderful character of Svāyambhuva Manu, the original king, whose reputation is worthy of description. Please hear as I speak of the flourishing of his daughter Devahūti.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Third Canto, Twenty-second Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Marriage of Kardama Muni and Devahūti.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I have described to you the amazing character of Svāyambhuva Manu, the first among kings, who is worthy of describing. Now hear about the power of his daughter. Udayam means power. Thus ends the commentary on Twenty-second Chapter of the Third Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty-three Request of Devahūti 3.23: Devahūti's Lamentation 23. Devahūti's Lamentation
📝 My note