FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

1.2 · Divinity and Divine Service

33 verses
S Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15476 chars)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The opening chapters of Srimad-Bhagavatam describe its uniqueness, background, primary contents and ultimate purpose. Before diving into this ocean of spiritual wisdom, we’re made aware of our great fortune in contacting this priceless scripture. Srimad-Bhagavatam invites us into Krishna’s world of unlimited possibility. It teaches us how to nourish the spirit, a transcendental endeavour which is founded upon the process of attentive hearing. By such aural reception, the heart is cleansed, our original consciousness is reawakened and we find what we have always been looking for.

Previous S.L.A.P Next Glorious Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The opening chapters of Srimad-Bhagavatam describe its uniqueness, background, primary contents and ultimate purpose. Before diving into this ocean of spiritual wisdom, we’re made aware of our great fortune in contacting this priceless scripture. Srimad-Bhagavatam invites us into Krishna’s world of unlimited possibility. It teaches us how to nourish the spirit, a transcendental endeavour which is founded upon the process of attentive hearing. By such aural reception, the heart is cleansed, our original consciousness is reawakened and we find what we have always been looking for.

Previous S.L.A.P Next Glorious Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Compilation of Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Compilation of Bhagavatam Chapter 4, 5, 6 Suta Goswami begins by addressing the first question regarding the compilation of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Once, whilst Srila Vyasadeva was deep in meditation, he envisioned the bleak future of civilisation. Moved by compassion, he resolved to make the spiritual truths more accessible for the mass of people. He divided the original Veda into four, compiled the fifth Veda consisting of ancient histories, and entrusted each division of literature to various sages for preservation, development and further dissemination. Despite producing so many volumes of books, Vyasadeva remained dissatisfied. When Narada Muni arrived at his hermitage in Badarikasrama, he immediately diagnosed the problem and instructed Vyasadeva to compile a literature which would beautifully highlight the identity and activities of Lord Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Narada informed him that his previous works had obscured this most essential revelation; so much was discussed, but the essence was overlooked. To highlight the power of hearing about Krishna, Narada Muni described how, through the association of great saints, he progressed in devotional service. The transformation took place by serving and hearing from spiritually evolved souls with the proper eagerness and humility. Being further questioned by Vyasadeva, Narada Muni explained his previous life as the son of a maidservant, how his mother died, his subsequent meeting with the Supersoul, and his current birth as a wandering sage. Narada clearly possessed the depth of realisation required to guide his disciple towards spiritual perfection. Having received these jewel-like instructions, Vyasadeva went into a divine trance and perfectly grasped all the spiritual conclusions. He subsequently compiled the Srimad-Bhagavatam and taught it to his son, Sukadeva Goswami.

Previous History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Next Ripened fruit Last updated 1 year ago

Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Chapter 1, 2, 3 At the sacred forest of Naimisaranya, located in present-day northern India, 88,000 sages had gathered. Headed by Saunaka Rishi, their noble purpose was to perform a one-thousand-year sacrifice for the spiritual well-being of mankind. Seeing the divine calibre and spotless character of Suta Goswami, the sages place six crucial enquiries before him. This exchange of questions and answers unveils essential spiritual truths for the benefit of countless generations to come [ 1 ].

“What is the ultimate good for humanity?” When living beings free themselves from selfish material desires, engage in unmotivated and uninterrupted service to Krishna, and thus develop pure love for Him, they truly satisfy their innermost yearning.

“What is the essence of all scriptural knowledge?” The understanding that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and that we should reestablish our lost relationship with Him through devotional service ( bhakti ).

“Why did Krishna appear in this world?” To protect and uplift those of saintly disposition, and to attract all other living entities to re-enter the spiritual world.

“What were the activities of the Lord in relation to creation?” After generating the entire material substance, the Lord facilitated the creative process by expanding as the various Vishnu incarnations, thus providing a stage for living entities to live separately from God.

“What were the activities of each incarnation of the Lord?” The various forms of the Lord descend from the spiritual world to the material world for different purposes, and Krishna is the original source of them all (twenty-two such incarnations are described).

“When Krishna departs from the world, where will religious principles be found?” Though religiosity ( dharma ) and knowledge ( jnana ) depart with Krishna when He leaves the material world, those living in the subsequent age of darkness can illuminate their lives by reading Srimad-Bhagavatam.

Suta Goswami thus highlights the compelling power of hearing Srimad- Bhagavatam. One who receives it with open ears and an open heart, is gifted with a profound understanding of Bhagavan (the Supreme Lord) and the process of bhakti (devotional service to Him), and simultaneously experiences a purification of heart that raises one to the platform of pure devotion.

Previous Glorious Bhagavatam Next The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Last updated 1 year ago

Glorious Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Glorious Bhagavatam Chapter 1 We want happiness, but first we must know who we are. To understand ourselves, we must identify our origin. When the sun rises, we automatically see ourselves – similarly, when we find God, we discover our true self. That’s why this book is so exceptional. Srila Vyasadeva, the great sage and author of Srimad-Bhagavatam, first brings our attention to Lord Krishna. He is the source of everything, the director of the material cosmos and the superlative enjoyer in His own abode. Through the teachings of Srimad-Bhagavatam, one can capture Krishna within the heart. The purity of this book is unparalleled since it sidelines all materialistic ideas, uproots all miseries and clearly distinguishes reality from illusion. Srila Vyasadeva, a literary giant, compiled it at the summit of his spiritual maturity, and it’s so comprehensive that nothing else is needed to achieve perfection. It is the mature fruit of the tree of Vedic knowledge, crystallising the essence of all wisdom. The author invites the reader to relish this masterpiece, which will surely trigger a revolution of consciousness within the individual, and indeed society at large.

Previous S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Next Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Last updated 1 year ago

History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Chapter 3, 4 Suta Goswami goes on to describe how he received the teachings of Srimad- Bhagavatam. Srila Vyasadeva had previously instructed Sukadeva Goswami, his son, in this spiritual science. Then, in a historic conversation, Sukadeva Goswami spoke it to Maharaja Pariksit, the saintly king who was cursed to die in seven days. Suta Goswami heard that recital and was now imparting the very same knowledge to the sages of Naimisaranya. Having received enlightening answers to their first six questions, the sages posed a further four questions surrounding the history of Srimad-Bhagavatam. The answers to those four questions extend to the end of Canto One [2] :

Why, when and where was Srimad-Bhagavatam compiled?

How was Sukadeva Goswami viewed by others and how did his meeting with Maharaja Pariksit transpire?

How was Maharaja Pariksit born and what were his activities?

Why did Maharaja Pariksit renounce everything and travel to the bank of the Ganges?

Previous The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Next Compilation of Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Ripened fruit

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Ripened fruit “The Personality of Godhead Sri Krishna appeared before us just a little prior to the beginning of Kali-yuga, and He returned to His eternal home practically at the commencement of Kali-yuga. While He was present, He exhibited everything by His different activities. He spoke the Bhagavad-gita specifically and eradicated all pretentious principles of religiosity. And prior to His departure from this material world, He empowered Sri Vyasadeva through Narada to compile the messages of the Srimad-Bhagavatam, and thus both the Bhagavad-gita and the Srimad-Bhagavatam are like torchbearers for the blind people of this age. In other words, if men in this age of Kali want to see the real light of life, they must take to these two books only, and their aim of life will be fulfilled. Bhagavad-gita is the preliminary study of the Bhagavatam. And Srimad-Bhagavatam is the summum bonum of life, Lord Sri Krishna personified. We must therefore accept Srimad-Bhagavatam as the direct representation of Lord Krishna. One who can see Srimad-Bhagavatam can see also Lord Sri Krishna in person. They are identical.” ( SB 1.3.43 ). Vyasadeva appeared in this world with the sole mission of educating the masses in transcendental knowledge. Seeing that the Vedic mantras had become unclear and confusing, he divided the one Veda into four separate works, and also compiled the fifth Veda (historical stories) to give further insight and information. These divisions were given to various sages who, under Vyasadeva’s guidance, elaborated upon them and produced voluminous texts, still very difficult for the layman to understand and apply. The various viewpoints expressed were also difficult to reconcile. Thus, Vyasadeva decided to harmonise the diversity by shrinking the thousands of millions of Vedic verses into a single book of concise codes known as the Vedanta-Sutra. After completing this work, he still felt it too ambiguous and complex for most people to understand, and thus attempted to communicate the same teachings in story-format through the epic history of India known as the Mahabharata. Despite these mammoth endeavours Vyasadeva remained dissatisfied, concerned that the essence had not yet come to the forefront. Enter Narada Muni, who expertly diagnosed the root cause of the author’s disenchantment. Srila Vyasadeva’s writings had stressed the preliminary (and often materialistic) goals of religion – dharma (piety), artha (economic development), kama (sense gratification) and moksa (release from suffering). The travelling mendicant explained how Vyasadeva had inadvertently misled people, failing to glorify the Supreme Lord and highlight His name, fame, pastimes and glories. Having received this wise counsel, Vyasadeva went on to compose the Srimad-Bhagavatam, which magnified and zeroed in on the essence of the Vedas: pure, untainted, loving devotion to Lord Krishna. At last, Vyasadeva felt satisfied in his endeavour to provide the light of knowledge to the lost souls of Kali-yuga, the current cosmic age of degradation. Srimad- Bhagavatam, the spotless ( amala ) Purana, would indeed be the saving grace in the impending dark times, clearly establishing the goal of life and the true source of unlimited happiness in no uncertain terms. Having compiled Srimad-Bhagavatam, Vyasadeva taught the contents to his son, Sukadeva Goswami. When he was born, Sukadeva Goswami immediately left home, fearful of potential material influences. Vyasadeva arranged to lure him back by having beautiful verses of the Srimad-Bhagavatam recited within his earshot. Sukadeva Goswami was indeed attracted to return, and subsequently heard the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam from his father. Later, Sukadeva Goswami met Maharaja Pariksit and narrated the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam to him in seven days. During that discourse, Vyasadeva and Suta Goswami were both present. Having grasped the entire narration, Suta Goswami later recited it to the sages of Naimisaranya, headed by Saunaka Rishi.

Previous Compilation of Bhagavatam Next The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) Ripened fruit The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam In bygone ages, all Vedic knowledge was passed down orally. People would hear the knowledge, remember it, assimilate it, and perfectly communicate it to the next person without any adulteration. The power of comprehension was so great that no written books were required. Foreseeing the degradation of Kali-yuga, however, Vyasadeva was eager to have the knowledge documented for posterity. Technically speaking, each narration of Srimad-Bhagavatam is slightly different. For example, the Srimad-Bhagavatam spoken by Sukadeva Goswami to Maharaja Pariksit is obviously not identical to that which was spoken by Suta Goswami to Saunaka Rishi. That said, the substance, emphasis and conclusion remains eternally unchanged. What to speak of these slight variations, in the various planetary systems we find different versions of the Srimad-Bhagavatam for different gradations of living entity. The Srimad-Bhagavatam existing in heavenly planets, for example, is far more voluminous. For the earthly humans, Vyasadeva chose to record the recital between Suta Goswami and Saunaka Rishi as the written form of Srimad-Bhagavatam. At the time of writing, numerous narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam were being conducted amongst the sages. Once this dialogue was put into written form, however, it became the standard. Spontaneous recitals of Srimad-Bhagavatam gradually disappeared, and as people lost their recollective powers they took shelter of this documented form of the epic conversation.

Previous Ripened fruit Next L - Love (7-11) Last updated 1 year ago

The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna)

S - Srimad-Bhagavatam (1-6) The Goal of Bhagavatam (Sri Krishna) Chapter 3 Srimad-Bhagavatam is the ripened fruit on the tree of all Vedic knowledge, and the twenty-eighth verse of Chapter Three is said to be the emperor of all its verses. After describing twenty-two of the Lord’s unlimited incarnations, Suta Goswami establishes, in no uncertain terms, that Krishna is the original source of them all: “All of the above-mentioned incarnations are either plenary portions or portions of the plenary portions of the Lord, but Lord Sri Krishna is the original Personality of Godhead. All of them appear on planets whenever there is a disturbance created by the atheists. The Lord incarnates to protect the theists.” ( SB 1.3.28 ) This verse, also known as the paribhasa-sutra (a verse which governs the entire book), reveals the purpose and essence of the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam – that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and the all-attractive goal of life.

Previous Essential Truths of Bhagavatam (Six Questions) Next History of Bhagavatam (Four Questions) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.1

↗
వ్యాస ఉవాచ ఇతి సమ్ప్రశ్నసంహృష్టో విప్రాణాం రౌమహర్షణి: । ప్రతిపూజ్య వచస్తేషాం ప్రవక్తుముపచక్రమే ॥ ౧ ॥
vyāsa uvāca
[vyaasa uvaacha]
iti sampraśna-saṁhṛṣṭo
[iti samprashna-samhrishto]
viprāṇāṁ raumaharṣaṇiḥ
[vipraanaam raumaharshanih]
pratipūjya vacas teṣāṁ
[pratipoojya vachas teshaam]
pravaktum upacakrame
[pravaktum upachakrame]
vyāsaḥ uvāca — Vyāsa said iti — thus sampraśna — perfect inquiries saṁhṛṣṭaḥ — perfectly satisfied viprāṇām — of the sages there raumaharṣaṇiḥ — the son of Romaharṣaṇa, namely Ugraśravā pratipūjya — after thanking them vacaḥ — words teṣām — their pravaktum — to reply to them upacakrame — attempted.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyāsa uvāca
vyāsaḥ uvāca
Vyāsa said
iti sampraśna-saṁhṛṣṭo
iti
thus
sampraśna
perfect inquiries
saṁhṛṣṭaḥ
perfectly satisfied
viprāṇāṁ raumaharṣaṇiḥ
viprāṇām
of the sages there
raumaharṣaṇiḥ
the son of Romaharṣaṇa, namely Ugraśravā
pratipūjya vacas teṣāṁ
pratipūjya
after thanking them
vacaḥ
words
teṣām
their
pravaktum upacakrame
pravaktum
to reply to them
upacakrame
attempted.
Ugraśravā [Sūta Gosvāmī], the son of Romaharṣaṇa, being fully satisfied by the perfect questions of the brāhmaṇas, thanked them and thus attempted to reply.

The sages of Naimiṣāraṇya asked Sūta Gosvāmī six questions, and so he is answering them one by one.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Romaharṣaṇa (Sūta or Ugraśravas), delighted at the questions of the sages, respecting their words, began to speak.
Commentary

In the second chapter there is a description of three items: the process (abhidheya), bhakti; the goal (prayojanam), prema; and the object of worship, the Supreme Lord Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa.

The son of Romaharṣaṇa was Ugraśravas (also called Sūta).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.2

↗
సూత ఉవాచ యం ప్రవ్రజన్తమనుపేతమపేతకృత్యం ద్వైపాయనో విరహకాతర ఆజుహావ । పుత్రేతి తన్మయతయా తరవోఽభినేదు- స్తం సర్వభూతహృదయం మునిమానతోఽస్మి ॥ ౨ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
yaṁ pravrajantam anupetam apeta-kṛtyaṁ
[yam pravrajantam anupetam apeta-krityam]
dvaipāyano viraha-kātara ājuhāva
[dvaipaayano viraha-kaatara aajuhaava]
putreti tan-mayatayā taravo ’bhinedus
[putreti tan-mayatayaa taravo ’bhinedus]
taṁ sarva-bhūta-hṛdayaṁ munim ānato ’smi
[tam sarva-bhoota-hridayam munim aanato ’smi]
sūtaḥ — Sūta Gosvāmī uvāca — said yam — whom pravrajantam — while going away for the renounced order of life anupetam — without being reformed by the sacred thread apeta — not undergoing ceremonies kṛtyam — prescribed duties dvaipāyanaḥ — Vyāsadeva viraha — separation kātaraḥ — being afraid of ājuhāva — exclaimed putra iti — O my son tat-mayatayā — being absorbed in that way taravaḥ — all the trees abhineduḥ — responded tam — unto him sarva — all bhūta — living entities hṛdayam — heart munim — sage ānataḥ asmi — offer obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ
Sūta Gosvāmī
uvāca
said
yaṁ pravrajantam anupetam apeta-kṛtyaṁ
yam
whom
pravrajantam
while going away for the renounced order of life
anupetam
without being reformed by the sacred thread
apeta
not undergoing ceremonies
kṛtyam
prescribed duties
dvaipāyano viraha-kātara ājuhāva
dvaipāyanaḥ
Vyāsadeva
viraha
separation
kātaraḥ
being afraid of
ājuhāva
exclaimed
putreti tan-mayatayā taravo ’bhinedus
putra iti
O my son
tat-mayatayā
being absorbed in that way
taravaḥ
all the trees
taṁ sarva-bhūta-hṛdayaṁ munim ānato ’smi
abhineduḥ
responded
tam
unto him
sarva
all
bhūta
living entities
hṛdayam
heart
munim
sage
ānataḥ asmi
offer obeisances.
Śrīla Sūta Gosvāmī said: Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto that great sage [Śukadeva Gosvāmī] who can enter the hearts of all. When he went away to take up the renounced order of life [sannyāsa], leaving home without undergoing reformation by the sacred thread or the ceremonies observed by the higher castes, his father, Vyāsadeva, fearing separation from him, cried out, “O my son!” Indeed, only the trees, which were absorbed in the same feelings of separation, echoed in response to the begrieved father.

The institution of varṇa and āśrama prescribes many regulative duties to be observed by its followers. Such duties enjoin that a candidate willing to study the Vedas must approach a bona fide spiritual master and request acceptance as his disciple. The sacred thread is the sign of those who are competent to study the Vedas from the ācārya, or the bona fide spiritual master. Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī did not undergo such purificatory ceremonies because he was a liberated soul from his very birth.

Generally, a man is born as an ordinary being, and by the purificatory processes he is born for the second time. When he sees a new light and seeks direction for spiritual progress, he approaches a spiritual master for instruction in the Vedas. The spiritual master accepts only the sincere inquirer as his disciple and gives him the sacred thread. In this way a man becomes twice-born, or a dvija. After qualifying as a dvija one may study the Vedas, and after becoming well versed in the Vedas one becomes a vipra. A vipra, or a qualified brāhmaṇa, thus realizes the Absolute and makes further progress in spiritual life until he reaches the Vaiṣṇava stage. The Vaiṣṇava stage is the postgraduate status of a brāhmaṇa. A progressive brāhmaṇa must necessarily become a Vaiṣṇava, for a Vaiṣṇava is a self-realized, learned brāhmaṇa.

Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a Vaiṣṇava from the beginning; therefore, there was no need for him to undergo all the processes of the varṇāśrama institution. Ultimately the aim of varṇāśrama-dharma is to turn a crude man into a pure devotee of the Lord, or a Vaiṣṇava. Anyone, therefore, who becomes a Vaiṣṇava accepted by the first-class Vaiṣṇava, or uttama-adhikārī Vaiṣṇava, is already considered a brāhmaṇa, regardless of his birth or past deeds. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu accepted this principle and recognized Śrīla Haridāsa Ṭhākura as the ācārya of the holy name, although Ṭhākura Haridāsa appeared in a Mohammedan family. In conclusion, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was born a Vaiṣṇava, and, therefore, brahminism was included in him. He did not have to undergo any ceremonies. Any lowborn person — be he a Kirāta, Hūṇa, Āndhra, Pulinda, Pulkaśa, Ābhīra, Śumbha, Yavana, Khasa or even lower — can be delivered to the highest transcendental position by the mercy of Vaiṣṇavas. Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was the spiritual master of Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī, who therefore offers his respectful obeisances unto Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī before he begins his answers to the questions of the sages at Naimiṣāraṇya.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: I offer my respects to the sage Śukadeva, who has entered the mind of all beings, and to whom Vyāsa, his father, cried out with pain of separation “O son!” when Śukadeva, without even undergoing saṁskāras, left home and could not be brought back. Even the trees, being attached to Śukadeva, called out “O son!”
Commentary

Here Sūta begins to reflect. I will speak the answer to the questions, the essence of all the scriptures, the very substance. They have asked for the essence which will please their intellects (yenātmā suprasīdati SB 1.1.11). If their intellects are not satisfied with this, what will happen? Therefore among all the essences, I should seek out that which is pleasing to the intellect as decided by the most righteous persons. Even though some righteous persons will say that the intellect is pleased with Sāṅkhya, some will say the intellect is pleased with Mīmāṁsa, or with the Upaniṣads, or the Vedānta-sūtras which discern the conclusion of the Upaniṣads, all that cannot be admitted. Among the sages, the chief is Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana-vyāsa, who knows all the philosophies, who wrote the Vedānta-sūtras, and whose vision is based on clarity of mind. I should speak that scripture, which remained steady, without objections from anyone, since it gave pleasure to all the sages, after withstanding the tests of all the great luminaries, the greatest philosophers present in the assembly gathered around King Parīkṣit. I should speak that scripture which is pure like the jāmbūnada river. I should speak the Bhāgavatam. Therefore I should surrender to Śrī-śukadeva, the speaker of the Bhāgavatam. He thus begins reciting this verse.

Śukadeva had departed, leaving everything (pravrajantam). Though he was nearby, Vyāsa could not catch him (anupetam). He had not received his sacred thread (apeta-kṛtyam) Vyāsa called out the protracted words, “O son!” But not only his father had great affection for him. Padma Purāṇa says:

yenārcito haris tena tarpitāni jaganty api | rajyanti jantavas tatra jangamāḥ sthāvarā api ||

He who worships the Lord pleases all living entities. All moving and non- moving beings are controlled by him. [Note: This verse is quoted in BRS 1.1.28 to illustrate the first two types of subhadā: he has affection for the world and the world has affection for him. ]

Thus even the trees lamented. Being completely attached to Śukadeva (tan-mayatayā) the trees, since they were facing him, called out in the form of echoes “O son!” When a person is attached to something he is said to be tan-maya. Thus strī-maya means a person who is attached to women. This affection for a person who resides in the mind of all living beings, like the attraction for the all-attractive deity of the Lord, is not a material illusion. Thus it is not a fault if Vyāsa seemed to lose his sense of discrimination.

Or there is another meaning. The trees, as another form of Śukadeva (tan-mayatayā), called out in echo, “O son!” to answer Vyāsa. If I am your son, then you are also my son. Illusion is the cause of thinking “I am the father, you are the son. Who is the son of whom? Who is the father of whom?” Enlightening Vyāsa about this truth, they hint “Why are you bewildered?”

For establishing attachment to Śukadeva, it is then described that he had entered into the minds of all living entities (sarva-bhūta-hṛdayam munim) by the power of his yoga. That being so, let him also enter my heart and speak the Bhāgavatam through my mouth! He who can enter into the dull trees and pacify his father by answering back can also enter my heart and please the intellects of all the hearers by the Bhāgavatam. Implied here is the rule that at the time of lecturing, other speakers of Bhāgavatam should also meditate in this way.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.3

↗
య: స్వానుభావమఖిలశ్రుతిసారమేక- మధ్యాత్మదీపమతితితీర్షతాం తమోఽన్ధమ్ । సంసారిణాం కరుణయాహ పురాణగుహ్యం తం వ్యాససూనుముపయామి గురుం మునీనామ్ ॥ ౩ ॥
yaḥ svānubhāvam akhila-śruti-sāram ekam
[yah svaanubhaavam akhila-shruti-saaram ekam]
adhyātma-dīpam atititīrṣatāṁ tamo ’ndham
[adhyaatma-deepam atititeershataam tamo ’ndham]
saṁsāriṇāṁ karuṇayāha purāṇa-guhyaṁ
[samsaarinaam karunayaaha puraana-guhyam]
taṁ vyāsa-sūnum upayāmi guruṁ munīnām
[tam vyaasa-soonum upayaami gurum muneenaam]
yaḥ — he who sva-anubhāvam — self-assimilated (experienced) akhila — all around śruti — the Vedas sāram — cream ekam — the only one adhyātma — transcendental dīpam — torchlight atititīrṣatām — desiring to overcome tamaḥ andham — deeply dark material existence saṁsāriṇām — of the materialistic men karuṇayā — out of causeless mercy āha — said purāṇa — supplement to the Vedas guhyam — very confidential tam — unto him vyāsa-sūnum — the son of Vyāsadeva upayāmi — let me offer my obeisances gurum — the spiritual master munīnām — of the great sages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ svānubhāvam akhila-śruti-sāram ekam
yaḥ
he who
sva-anubhāvam
self-assimilated (experienced)
akhila
all around
śruti
the Vedas
sāram
cream
ekam
the only one
adhyātma-dīpam atititīrṣatāṁ tamo ’ndham
adhyātma
transcendental
dīpam
torchlight
atititīrṣatām
desiring to overcome
tamaḥ andham
deeply dark material existence
saṁsāriṇāṁ karuṇayāha purāṇa-guhyaṁ
saṁsāriṇām
of the materialistic men
karuṇayā
out of causeless mercy
āha
said
purāṇa
supplement to the Vedas
guhyam
very confidential
taṁ vyāsa-sūnum upayāmi guruṁ munīnām
tam
unto him
vyāsa-sūnum
the son of Vyāsadeva
upayāmi
let me offer my obeisances
gurum
the spiritual master
munīnām
of the great sages.
Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto him [Śuka], the spiritual master of all sages, the son of Vyāsadeva, who, out of his great compassion for those gross materialists who struggle to cross over the darkest regions of material existence, spoke this most confidential supplement to the cream of Vedic knowledge, after having personally assimilated it by experience.

In this prayer, Śrīla Sūta Gosvāmī practically summarizes the complete introduction of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the natural supplementary commentary on the Vedānta-sūtras. The Vedānta-sūtras, or the Brahma-sūtras, were compiled by Vyāsadeva with a view to presenting just the cream of Vedic knowledge. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the natural commentary on this cream. Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a thoroughly realized master on the Vedānta-sūtra, and consequently he also personally realized the commentary, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. And just to show his boundless mercy upon bewildered materialistic men who want to cross completely over nescience, he recited for the first time this confidential knowledge.

There is no point in arguing that a materialistic man can be happy. No materialistic creature — be he the great Brahmā or an insignificant ant — can be happy. Everyone tries to make a permanent plan for happiness, but everyone is baffled by the laws of material nature. Therefore the materialistic world is called the darkest region of God’s creation. Yet the unhappy materialists can get out of it simply by desiring to get out. Unfortunately they are so foolish that they do not want to escape. Therefore they are compared to the camel who relishes thorny twigs because he likes the taste of the twigs mixed with blood. He does not realize that it is his own blood and that his tongue is being cut by the thorns. Similarly, to the materialist his own blood is as sweet as honey, and although he is always harassed by his own material creations, he does not wish to escape. Such materialists are called karmīs. Out of hundreds of thousands of karmīs, only a few may feel tired of material engagement and desire to get out of the labyrinth. Such intelligent persons are called jṣānīs. The Vedānta-sūtra is directed to such jṣānīs. But Śrīla Vyāsadeva, being the incarnation of the Supreme Lord, could foresee the misuse of the Vedānta-sūtra by unscrupulous men, and, therefore, he personally supplemented the Vedānta-sūtra with the Bhāgavata Purāṇa. It is clearly said that this Bhāgavatam is the original commentary on the Brahma-sūtras. Śrīla Vyāsadeva also instructed the Bhāgavatam to his own son, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī, who was already at the liberated stage of transcendence. Śrīla Śukadeva realized it personally and then explained it. By the mercy of Śrīla Śukadeva, the Bhāgavata-vedānta-sūtra is available for all those sincere souls who want to get out of material existence.

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the one unrivaled commentary on Vedānta-sūtra. Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya intentionally did not touch it because he knew that the natural commentary would be difficult for him to surpass. He wrote his Śārīraka-bhāṣya, and his so-called followers deprecated the Bhāgavatam as some “new” presentation. One should not be misled by such propaganda directed against the Bhāgavatam by the Māyāvāda school. From this introductory śloka, the beginning student should know that Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the only transcendental literature meant for those who are paramahaṁsas and completely freed from the material disease called malice. The Māyāvādīs are envious of the Personality of Godhead despite Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya’s admission that Nārāyaṇa, the Personality of Godhead, is above the material creation. The envious Māyāvādī cannot have access to the Bhāgavatam, but those who are really anxious to get out of this material existence may take shelter of this Bhāgavatam because it is uttered by the liberated Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī. It is the transcendental torchlight by which one can see perfectly the transcendental Absolute Truth realized as Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I surrender to the son of Vyāsa, the incomparable guru of all the sages, who mercifully spoke the Purāṇa full of hidden meanings, the essence of all the scriptures, the essence of hearing, for all the people of this world, even in the future; who spoke the Bhāgavatam, which revealed the excellence of rasa to Śukadeva, and which is the revealer of ātmā for those desiring to cross dense ignorance with ease.
Commentary

He says that the reason for Śukadeva inspiring Sūta is his mercy. He should not only deliver Parīkṣit, but he should also deliver all the persons born in this world in the future. At that moment, Sūta remembered all the future generations. And for those who desire to cross (atititīrṣatām) the dense (andham) ignorance (tamaḥ) with great ease (ati), the Bhāgavatam causes revelation (dīpam) of the jīva (adhyātma) — he who controls (adhi) the elements of the body such as mahattattva. This refers to the secondary result of the Bhāgavatam—destruction of ignorance—for the desirers of liberation. For the pure devotees, Bhāgavatam contains the essence of all the śrutis, of all the Upaniṣads, and taking another meaning of śruti, Bhāgavatam is the essence for those who relish with the ear (śruti) by hearing. This is indicated by 1.1.3, where Bhāgavatam is said to be the ripened fruit of the tree of the Vedas. For Śukadeva as well (sva), Bhāgavatam revealed the power of abundant rasa (anubhāvam). Thus it is said:

sva-sukha-nibhṛta-cetās tad-vyudastānya-bhāvo ’py ajita-rucira-līlākṛṣṭa-sāras tadīyam vyatanuta kṛpayā yas tattva-dīpaṁ purāṇaṁ tam akhila-vṛjina-ghnaṁ vyāsa-sūnuṁ nato ’smi

Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto my spiritual master, the son of Vyāsadeva, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, who destroys of all sin, and who, though fixed in his own bliss with no distractions, became attracted to the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa, and mercifully spread the Bhāgavatam which describes Kṛṣṇa, and reveals the rasa of his pastimes. SB 12.12.69

It is also said harer guṇākṣipta-matir: his mind also became attracted to the qualities of the Lord by studying Bhāgavatam. (SB 1.7.11)

pariniṣṭhito ’pi nairguṇya uttama-śloka-līlayā gṛhīta-cetā rājarṣe ākhyānaṁ yad adhītavān

O saintly King, I was certainly situated perfectly in transcendence, yet I was still attracted by the delineation of the pastimes of the Lord, who is described by enlightened verses. SB 2.1.9

Or svānubhāvam can mean “that which produced Śukadeva’s power.” This explanation indicates that Bhāgavatam made Śukadeva superior to all other sages. Ekam means incomparable, without a second. Śukadeva became the guru of all the sages such as Nārada and Vyāsa who were seated in the assembly of Parīkṣit and taught them Bhāgavatam as if it had not been heard before. The Bhāgavatam must be taught to them as well. The Tattva-sandarbha has pointed this out.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.4

↗
నారాయణం నమస్కృత్య నరం చైవ నరోత్తమమ్ । దేవీం సరస్వతీం వ్యాసం తతో జయముదీరయేత్ ॥ ౪ ॥
nārāyaṇaṁ namaskṛtya
[naaraayanam namaskritya]
naraṁ caiva narottamam
[naram chaiva narottamam]
devīṁ sarasvatīṁ vyāsaṁ
[deveem sarasvateem vyaasam]
tato jayam udīrayet
[tato jayam udeerayet]
nārāyaṇam — the Personality of Godhead namaḥ-kṛtya — after offering respectful obeisances naram ca eva — and Nārāyaṇa Ṛṣi nara-uttamam — the supermost human being devīm — the goddess sarasvatīm — the mistress of learning vyāsam — Vyāsadeva tataḥ — thereafter jayam — all that is meant for conquering udīrayet — be announced.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārāyaṇaṁ namaskṛtya
nārāyaṇam
the Personality of Godhead
namaḥ-kṛtya
after offering respectful obeisances
naraṁ caiva narottamam
naram ca eva
and Nārāyaṇa Ṛṣi
nara-uttamam
the supermost human being
devīṁ sarasvatīṁ vyāsaṁ
devīm
the goddess
sarasvatīm
the mistress of learning
vyāsam
Vyāsadeva
tato jayam udīrayet
tataḥ
thereafter
jayam
all that is meant for conquering
udīrayet
be announced.
Before reciting this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which is the very means of conquest, one should offer respectful obeisances unto the Personality of Godhead, Nārāyaṇa, unto Nara-nārāyaṇa Ṛṣi, the supermost human being, unto mother Sarasvatī, the goddess of learning, and unto Śrīla Vyāsadeva, the author.

All the Vedic literatures and the Purāṇas are meant for conquering the darkest region of material existence. The living being is in the state of forgetfulness of his relation with God due to his being overly attracted to material sense gratification from time immemorial. His struggle for existence in the material world is perpetual, and it is not possible for him to get out of it by making plans. If he at all wants to conquer this perpetual struggle for existence, he must reestablish his eternal relation with God. And one who wants to adopt such remedial measures must take shelter of literatures such as the Vedas and the Purāṇas. Foolish people say that the Purāṇas have no connection with the Vedas. However, the Purāṇas are supplementary explanations of the Vedas intended for different types of men. All men are not equal. There are men who are conducted by the mode of goodness, others who are under the mode of passion and others who are under the mode of ignorance. The Purāṇas are so divided that any class of men can take advantage of them and gradually regain their lost position and get out of the hard struggle for existence. Śrīla Sūta Gosvāmī shows the way of chanting the Purāṇas. This may be followed by persons who aspire to be preachers of the Vedic literatures and the Purāṇas. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the spotless Purāṇa, and it is especially meant for them who desire to get out of the material entanglement permanently.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After offering respectful obeisances unto the presiding deities Nara-nārāyaṇa Ṛṣi, unto the subject of the work Kṛṣṇa, unto the śakti of the work Sarasvatī, and unto the sage entristed with the work Śrīla Vyāsadeva, one should utter "Jaya."
Commentary

Having offered respects to guru, Sūta offers respects to devatā, presiding deity, etc. Nara-nārāyaṇa are designated as the presiding deities of this work since they have authority over the place. [Note: Vyāsa first wrote the work in Badarikāśrama, where Nara-nārāyaṇa preside.]The devatā or subject of the Bhāgavatam is Kṛṣṇa (narottamam). Sarasvatī is the śakti. [Note: This is not the material deity. In the spiritual world exist counterparts to the devatās of the material world who assist the Lord in his pastimes there. For instance divyā Sarasvatī gives Kṛṣṇa mantra to Brahmā in Brahma-saṁhitā.] The word ca indicates the ṛṣi (sage) of the work, Vyāsa. [Note: Before reciting a mantra or a scripture, it is customary to utter the name of the sage who revealed the mantra (in this case Vyāsa), the meter (gāyatrī), the form of the Lord who is the subject of the mantra (Kṛṣṇa), the bīja of the work or mantra (oṁ), the śakti of the work or mantra (Sarasvatī), the adhiṣṭhātṛ-devatā (Nara-nārāyaṇa) and the purpose of uttering the mantra. ] Some editions have the word vyāsam instead of caiva. That makes the meaning clear. The bīja is oṁ and the meter is predominantly gāyatrī, since the first verse of Bhāgavatam begins with oṁ and reference to gāyatrī. Having offered respects to these persons, one should utter “Jaya.” This is a verb form, calling out to Kṛṣṇa with raised hands. (Jaya Śrī-kṛṣṇa! Victory to Kṛṣṇa!) By using the potential case, Sūta teaches other sages of the Purāṇas to do the same. Jaya also refers to this scripture because one can conquer saṁsāra by studying it. So the meaning would be “One should then speak the Bhāgavatam (jayam). In this verse, since the verb form namaskṛtya indicates that another action immediately follows, the word tataḥ with the meaning of “next, then” would be superfluous. Therefore tataḥ describes the subject of the sentence. Tataḥ is a past participle of tan (to spread words, to speak). Thus tato jayam udīrayet means “the speaker should utter jaya.” This is the opinion of some.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.5

↗
మునయ: సాధు పృష్టోఽహం భవద్భ‍ిర్లోకమఙ్గలమ్ । యత్కృత: కృష్ణసమ్ప్రశ్నో యేనాత్మా సుప్రసీదతి ॥ ౫ ॥
munayaḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo ’haṁ
[munayah saadhu prishto ’ham]
bhavadbhir loka-maṅgalam
[bhavadbhir loka-mangalam]
yat kṛtaḥ kṛṣṇa-sampraśno
[yat kritah krishna-samprashno]
yenātmā suprasīdati
[yenaatmaa supraseedati]
munayaḥ — O sages sādhu — this is relevant pṛṣṭaḥ — questioned aham — myself bhavadbhiḥ — by all of you loka — the world maṅgalam — welfare yat — because kṛtaḥ — made kṛṣṇa — the Personality of Godhead sampraśnaḥ — relevant question yena — by which ātmā — self suprasīdati — completely pleased.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
munayaḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo ’haṁ
munayaḥ
O sages
sādhu
this is relevant
pṛṣṭaḥ
questioned
bhavadbhir loka-maṅgalam
yat kṛtaḥ kṛṣṇa-sampraśno
aham
myself
bhavadbhiḥ
by all of you
loka
the world
yenātmā suprasīdati
maṅgalam
welfare
yat
because
kṛtaḥ
made
kṛṣṇa
the Personality of Godhead
sampraśnaḥ
relevant question
yena
by which
ātmā
self
suprasīdati
completely pleased.
O sages, I have been justly questioned by you. Your questions are worthy because they relate to Lord Kṛṣṇa and so are of relevance to the world’s welfare. Only questions of this sort are capable of completely satisfying the self.

Since it has been stated hereinbefore that in the Bhāgavatam the Absolute Truth is to be known, the questions of the sages of Naimiṣāraṇya are proper and just, because they pertain to Kṛṣṇa, who is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Absolute Truth. In Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) the Personality of Godhead says that in all the Vedas there is nothing but the urge for searching after Him, Lord Kṛṣṇa. Thus the questions that pertain to Kṛṣṇa are the sum and substance of all the Vedic inquiries.

The whole world is full of questions and answers. The birds, beasts and men are all busy in the matter of perpetual questions and answers. In the morning the birds in the nest become busy with questions and answers, and in the evening also the same birds come back and again become busy with questions and answers. The human being, unless he is fast asleep at night, is busy with questions and answers. The businessmen in the market are busy with questions and answers, and so also the lawyers in the court and the students in the schools and colleges. The legislators in the parliament are also busy with questions and answers, and the politicians and the press representatives are all busy with questions and answers. Although they go on making such questions and answers for their whole lives, they are not at all satisfied. Satisfaction of the soul can only be obtained by questions and answers on the subject of Kṛṣṇa.

Kṛṣṇa is our most intimate master, friend, father or son and object of conjugal love. Forgetting Kṛṣṇa, we have created so many objects of questions and answers, but none of them are able to give us complete satisfaction. All things — but Kṛṣṇa — give temporary satisfaction only, so if we are to have complete satisfaction we must take to the questions and answers about Kṛṣṇa. We cannot live for a moment without being questioned or without giving answers. Because the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam deals with questions and answers that are related to Kṛṣṇa, we can derive the highest satisfaction only by reading and hearing this transcendental literature. One should learn the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and make an all-around solution to all problems pertaining to social, political or religious matters. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Kṛṣṇa are the sum total of all things.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O sages! You have asked good questions about what is beneficial for the world, because you have asked questions all about Kṛṣṇa, by which the intellect is immediately satisfied.
Commentary

It has been said previously (1.2.1) that Sūta respects the words of the sages. This verse describes that respect. O sages (munayaḥ)! The questions are very good because I have been asked about what is auspicious for the world. Why is that good? You have asked questions about Kṛṣṇa, all sorts of questions about Kṛṣṇa (sampraśnaḥ). And why is that good? By such questions about Kṛṣṇa the intellect becomes satisfied. It is my experience that by such question about Kṛṣṇa alone immediately the intellect becomes satisfied.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.6

↗
స వై పుంసాం పరో ధర్మో యతో భక్తిరధోక్షజే । అహైతుక్యప్రతిహతా యయాత్మా సుప్రసీదతి ॥ ౬ ॥
sa vai puṁsāṁ paro dharmo
[sa vai pumsaam paro dharmo]
yato bhaktir adhokṣaje
[yato bhaktir adhokshaje]
ahaituky apratihatā
[ahaituky apratihataa]
yayātmā suprasīdati
[yayaatmaa supraseedati]
saḥ — that vai — certainly puṁsām — for mankind paraḥ — sublime dharmaḥ — occupation yataḥ — by which bhaktiḥ — devotional service adhokṣaje — unto the Transcendence ahaitukī — causeless apratihatā — unbroken yayā — by which ātmā — the self suprasīdati — completely satisfied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vai puṁsāṁ paro dharmo
saḥ
that
vai
certainly
puṁsām
for mankind
paraḥ
sublime
dharmaḥ
occupation
yato bhaktir adhokṣaje
yataḥ
by which
bhaktiḥ
devotional service
adhokṣaje
unto the Transcendence
ahaituky apratihatā
ahaitukī
causeless
apratihatā
unbroken
yayātmā suprasīdati
yayā
by which
ātmā
the self
suprasīdati
completely satisfied.
The supreme occupation [dharma] for all humanity is that by which men can attain to loving devotional service unto the transcendent Lord. Such devotional service must be unmotivated and uninterrupted to completely satisfy the self.

In this statement, Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī answers the first question of the sages of Naimiṣāraṇya. The sages asked him to summarize the whole range of revealed scriptures and present the most essential part so that fallen people or the people in general might easily take it up. The Vedas prescribe two different types of occupation for the human being. One is called the pravṛtti-mārga, or the path of sense enjoyment, and the other is called the nivṛtti-mārga, or the path of renunciation. The path of enjoyment is inferior, and the path of sacrifice for the supreme cause is superior. The material existence of the living being is a diseased condition of actual life. Actual life is spiritual existence, or brahma-bhūta existence, where life is eternal, blissful and full of knowledge. Material existence is temporary, illusory and full of miseries. There is no happiness at all. There is just the futile attempt to get rid of the miseries, and temporary cessation of misery is falsely called happiness. Therefore, the path of progressive material enjoyment, which is temporary, miserable and illusory, is inferior. But devotional service to the Supreme Lord, which leads one to eternal, blissful and all-cognizant life, is called the superior quality of occupation. This is sometimes polluted when mixed with the inferior quality. For example, adoption of devotional service for material gain is certainly an obstruction to the progressive path of renunciation. Renunciation or abnegation for ultimate good is certainly a better occupation than enjoyment in the diseased condition of life. Such enjoyment only aggravates the symptoms of disease and increases its duration. Therefore devotional service to the Lord must be pure in quality, i.e., without the least desire for material enjoyment. One should, therefore, accept the superior quality of occupation in the form of the devotional service of the Lord without any tinge of unnecessary desire, fruitive action and philosophical speculation. This alone can lead one to perpetual solace in His service.

We have purposely denoted dharma as occupation because the root meaning of the word dharma is “that which sustains one’s existence.” A living being’s sustenance of existence is to coordinate his activities with his eternal relation with the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa is the central pivot of living beings, and He is the all-attractive living entity or eternal form amongst all other living beings or eternal forms. Each and every living being has his eternal form in the spiritual existence, and Kṛṣṇa is the eternal attraction for all of them. Kṛṣṇa is the complete whole, and everything else is His part and parcel. The relation is one of the servant and the served. It is transcendental and is completely distinct from our experience in material existence. This relation of servant and the served is the most congenial form of intimacy. One can realize it as devotional service progresses. Everyone should engage himself in that transcendental loving service of the Lord, even in the present conditional state of material existence. That will gradually give one the clue to actual life and please him to complete satisfaction.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The supreme dharma for all human beings (sādhana bhakti) is that by which prema-bhakti to the Lord arises, which is not caused by anything other than itself, cannot be obstructed, and which satisfies the mind completely.
Commentary

This verse answers the second question of the sages: what is the final essence of all the scriptures. That essence is highest dharma for anyone who is a human being (puṁsām), meaning hearing and chanting about the Lord. It is said:

etāvān eva loke ’smin puṁsāṁ dharmaḥ paraḥ smṛtaḥ bhakti-yogo bhagavati tan-nāma-grahaṇādibhiḥ

That is the only means for attainment of the final perfection of life. Therefore persons whose minds are fixed on the Lord engage in the intensive practice of devotional service. SB 6.3.22

By this statement, The word para along with dharma in the present verse can indicate only bhakti-yoga. Etavān eva indicates exclusion of other processes as para-dharma. The essence of scripture is bhakti-yoga by which prema-bhakti (yataḥ bhaktiḥ) appears. It arises without cause (ahaitukī). Mixed bhakti is excluded in this definition (since it has cause). “But you are really evading the truth here (saying that prema is not caused by sādhana-bhakti).” No. Dharma consisting of hearing and chanting about the Lord is called sādhana-bhakti, and in the mature state it is called prema. Both are called bhakti, for it is said bhaktyā saṣjātayā bhaktyā bibhraty utpulakāṁ tanum: the devotee possesses a body with ecstatic symptoms by prema developed through sādhana-bhakti. (SB 11.3.31) In the verse being discussed, the former bhakti (paro dharmo) is the cause of the later type of bhakti (yato bhaktir adhokṣaje), just as an unripe mango is the cause of a ripe mango. Considering one the cause of the other because of the difference in taste is simply a conception for understanding the different strengths of bhakti, though sādhana-bhakti and prema are not actually different things. The various states of infancy, youth and adulthood in one person are actually not conditions of cause and results of that cause (since the person remains). On the other hand, when pots, cloth and cooked rise arise, the original names and forms of mud, thread and raw rice disappear. One cannot compare these examples to bhakti and prema.

One also not say that the famous cause of bhakti is association of devotees, for association of devotees is part of bhakti. It is the second stage, as understood from the statement ādau śraddhā tataḥ sādhu-saṅgo ’tha bjajana-kriyā. (BRS 1.3.11) And later it will be said:

śuśrūṣoḥ śraddadhānasya vāsudeva-kathā-ruciḥ syān mahat-sevayā viprāḥ puṇya-tīrtha-niṣevaṇāt

O twice-born sages, by serving those devotees who are completely freed from all vice, great service is done. By such service, one gains affinity for hearing the messages of Vāsudeva. SB 1.2.16

Such things as charity, vows, austerity, sacrifices, and selfless performance of duties are to some degree causes of bhakti in sattva-guṇa, practiced as an aṅga of jṣāna. But they are not causes of pure bhakti, because it is said:

yaṁ na yogena sāṅkhyena dāna-vrata-tapo-’dhvaraiḥ | vyākhyā-svādhyāya-sannyāsaiḥ prāpnuyād yatnavān api ||

Even though one engages with great endeavor in the mystic yoga system, philosophical speculation, charity, vows, penances, ritualistic sacrifices, teaching of Vedic mantras to others, personal study of the Vedas, or the renounced order of life, still one cannot achieve Me. SB 11.12.9

Nor can it even be said that the mercy of the Lord is the cause of pure bhakti, for it is non-final cause, making one search out a further cause. One cannot say that the Lord’s mercy is absolute, without further cause, for then it would mean the Lord is unjust and prejudiced in choosing to give mercy without reason to certain individuals and not to others. However if one says that the cause of bhakti is the mercy of the devotee, it is not so incorrect. Though the uttama-bhaktas do not make distinctions and are thus not prejudiced, one does see the madhyama-bhakta making distinctions between the Lord, the devotee, the innocent and the demon. Thus because the Lord is dependent on the devotee, the Lord’s mercy follows after the mercy of the devotee. That is the correct conclusion.

But then how is bhakti said to be without cause (ahaitukum) in this verse? Because the Lords mercy is included in the mercy of the devotee, and because that mercy is included in association with devotees, and because devotee association is an aṅga of bhakti, bhakti is said to be without cause (since an aṅga of bhakti causes bhakti). Moreover the cause of devotee’s mercy is but the bhakti present in the heart of the devotee, because without that bhakti in his heart there is no possibility of his mercy arising. In all ways therefore, bhakti is the cause of bhakti. Therefore bhakti is said to be without cause. From the point of view of bhakti, the devotee, bhakti, the Lord, and his mercy are not separate items. Even though bhakti appears by bhakti (thus being self-manifesting), it does not negate the fact that bhakti’s self-manifesting nature comes from the Lord.

This bhakti cannot be prevented by anything (apratihatā). This is mentioned in the following verse:

mad-guṇa-śruti-mātreṇa mayi sarva-guhāśaye mano-gatir avicchinnā yathā gaṅgāmbhaso ’mbudhau

Just as the water of the Ganges flows naturally down towards the ocean, such devotional ecstasy, uninterrupted by any material condition, flows towards the Supreme Lord. SB 3.29.11

Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī has also said sarvathā dhvaṁsa-rahitaṁ saty api dhvaṁsa-kāraṇe: bhakti is without destruction, though it is the cause of destruction of obstacles. (Ujjvala-nīla-maṇi 14.63) Apratihatā can also mean that this prema-bhakti is not contaminated by jṣāna or karma. By that bhakti (yayā) the mind (ātmā) becomes completely satisfied (suprasīdati). Because of the impossibility of the mind being satisfied with the presence of material desires, it is evident that this bhakti being discussed is without any material desires.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.7

↗
వాసుదేవే భగవతి భక్తియోగ: ప్రయోజిత: । జనయత్యాశు వైరాగ్యం జ్ఞానం చ యదహైతుకమ్ ॥ ౭ ॥
vāsudeve bhagavati
[vaasudeve bhagavati]
bhakti-yogaḥ prayojitaḥ
[bhakti-yogah prayojitah]
janayaty āśu vairāgyaṁ
[janayaty aashu vairaagyam]
jṣānaṁ ca yad ahaitukam
[jshaanam cha yad ahaitukam]
vāsudeve — unto Kṛṣṇa bhagavati — unto the Personality of Godhead bhakti-yogaḥ — contact of devotional service prayojitaḥ — being applied janayati — does produce āśu — very soon vairāgyam — detachment jṣānam — knowledge ca — and yat — that which ahaitukam — causeless.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vāsudeve bhagavati
vāsudeve
unto Kṛṣṇa
bhagavati
unto the Personality of Godhead
bhakti-yogaḥ prayojitaḥ
bhakti-yogaḥ
contact of devotional service
prayojitaḥ
being applied
janayaty āśu vairāgyaṁ
janayati
does produce
āśu
very soon
vairāgyam
detachment
jṣānaṁ ca yad ahaitukam
jṣānam
knowledge
ca
and
yat
that which
ahaitukam
causeless.
By rendering devotional service unto the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, one immediately acquires causeless knowledge and detachment from the world.

Those who consider devotional service to the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa to be something like material emotional affairs may argue that in the revealed scriptures, sacrifice, charity, austerity, knowledge, mystic powers and similar other processes of transcendental realization are recommended. According to them, bhakti, or the devotional service of the Lord, is meant for those who cannot perform the high-grade activities. Generally it is said that the bhakti cult is meant for the śūdras, vaiśyas and the less intelligent woman class. But that is not the actual fact. The bhakti cult is the topmost of all transcendental activities, and therefore it is simultaneously sublime and easy. It is sublime for the pure devotees who are serious about getting in contact with the Supreme Lord, and it is easy for the neophytes who are just on the threshold of the house of bhakti. To achieve the contact of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is a great science, and it is open for all living beings, including the śūdras, vaiśyas, women and even those lower than the lowborn śūdras, so what to speak of the high-class men like the qualified brāhmaṇas and the great self-realized kings. The other high-grade activities designated as sacrifice, charity, austerity, etc., are all corollary factors following the pure and scientific bhakti cult.

The principles of knowledge and detachment are two important factors on the path of transcendental realization. The whole spiritual process leads to perfect knowledge of everything material and spiritual, and the results of such perfect knowledge are that one becomes detached from material affection and becomes attached to spiritual activities. Becoming detached from material things does not mean becoming inert altogether, as men with a poor fund of knowledge think. Naiṣkarma means not undertaking activities that will produce good or bad effects. Negation does not mean negation of the positive. Negation of the nonessentials does not mean negation of the essential. Similarly, detachment from material forms does not mean nullifying the positive form. The bhakti cult is meant for realization of the positive form. When the positive form is realized, the negative forms are automatically eliminated. Therefore, with the development of the bhakti cult, with the application of positive service to the positive form, one naturally becomes detached from inferior things, and he becomes attached to superior things. Similarly, the bhakti cult, being the supermost occupation of the living being, leads him out of material sense enjoyment. That is the sign of a pure devotee. He is not a fool, nor is he engaged in the inferior energies, nor does he have material values. This is not possible by dry reasoning. It actually happens by the grace of the Almighty. In conclusion, one who is a pure devotee has all other good qualities, namely knowledge, detachment, etc., but one who has only knowledge or detachment is not necessarily well acquainted with the principles of the bhakti cult. Bhakti is the supermost occupation of the human being.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Bhakti dedicated to Lord Kṛṣṇa, endowed with special moods, quickly produces detachment from material goals and knowledge of the Lord devoid of the desire for liberation.
Commentary

What form does that satisfaction of the mind take? This satisfaction of the mind is filled with knowledge and experience of the form, qualities and sweetness of the Lord, which cause complete disgust with all inferior objects. That is explained in this verse. This bhakti is endowed (yojitaḥ) in an excellent manner (pra for prakarṣeṇa), with dāsya, sakhya and other loving emotions. Another meaning of bhakti-yogaḥ prayojitaḥ is “bhakti-yoga has been made the only goal (prayojana).” Separate endeavor for attaining knowledge and detachment are not necessary in the practice of bhakti, for bhakti itself produces them. Very quickly (āśu) at the time of performing bhakti, they are attained, for it is said:

bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktir anyatra caiṣa trika eka-kālaḥ| prapadyamānasya yathāśnataḥ syus tuṣṭiḥ puṣṭiḥ kṣud-apāyo ’nu-ghāsam ||

Devotion, direct experience of the Supreme Lord, and detachment from other things—these three occur simultaneously for one who has taken shelter of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, in the same way that pleasure, nourishment and relief from hunger come simultaneously and increasingly, with each bite, for a person engaged in eating. SB 11.2.42

There is an objection that if one possesses knowledge, one attains liberation. In answer to this, the verse says that this knowledge is ahaitukam, without motivation for liberation. Ahaitukam comes from hetu, meaning cause or purpose, just as one can say “He lives for eating.” This means “He lives with the goal of eating.” Thus in this verse jnānam ahaitukam means “knowledge without the goal of liberation.” Therefore by practicing bhakti in which knowledge also manifests without the goal of liberation, the liberation of merging does not take place. Knowledge in this case means knowledge and experience of the Lord’s form, qualities and sweetness.

Thus it is said in the Fourth Canto:

vāsudeve bhagavati bhakti-yogaḥ samāhitaḥ | sadhrīcīnena vairāgyaṁ jṣānaṁ ca janayiṣyati ||

The stage of prema-bhakti completely dedicated to Vāsudeva, produces complete jṣāna and vairāgya. SB 4.29.37

One should practice bhakti with only that goal in mind (sadhrīcīnena), devoid of desire for liberation or other goals. The next verse shows that this type of bhakti is the cause of another type of bhakti.

so ’cirād eva rājarṣe syād acyuta-kathāśrayaḥ | śṛṇvataḥ śraddadhānasya nityadā syād adhīyataḥ ||

O saintly king! One who hears and studies with faith very soon attains the shelter topics of the Lord to attain prema. SB 4.29.38

Thus it is established in this verse that bhakti alone functions as both the cause and the goal (and not knowledge or detachment).

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.8

↗
ధర్మ: స్వనుష్ఠిత: పుంసాం విష్వక్సేనకథాసు య: । నోత్పాదయేద్యది రతిం శ్రమ ఏవ హి కేవలమ్ ॥ ౮ ॥
dharmaḥ svanuṣṭhitaḥ puṁsāṁ
[dharmah svanushthitah pumsaam]
viṣvaksena-kathāsu yaḥ
[vishvaksena-kathaasu yah]
notpādayed yadi ratiṁ
[notpaadayed yadi ratim]
śrama eva hi kevalam
[shrama eva hi kevalam]
dharmaḥ — occupation svanuṣṭhitaḥ — executed in terms of one’s own position puṁsām — of humankind viṣvaksena — the Personality of Godhead (plenary portion) kathāsu — in the message of yaḥ — what is na — not utpādayet — does produce yadi — if ratim — attraction śramaḥ — useless labor eva — only hi — certainly kevalam — entirely.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharmaḥ svanuṣṭhitaḥ puṁsāṁ
dharmaḥ
occupation
svanuṣṭhitaḥ
executed in terms of one’s own position
puṁsām
of humankind
viṣvaksena-kathāsu yaḥ
viṣvaksena
the Personality of Godhead (plenary portion)
kathāsu
in the message of
yaḥ
what is
na
not
utpādayet
does produce
notpādayed yadi ratiṁ
yadi
if
ratim
attraction
śrama eva hi kevalam
śramaḥ
useless labor
eva
only
hi
certainly
kevalam
entirely.
The occupational activities a man performs according to his own position are only so much useless labor if they do not provoke attraction for the message of the Personality of Godhead.

There are different occupational activities in terms of man’s different conceptions of life. To the gross materialist who cannot see anything beyond the gross material body, there is nothing beyond the senses. Therefore his occupational activities are limited to concentrated and extended selfishness. Concentrated selfishness centers around the personal body — this is generally seen amongst the lower animals. Extended selfishness is manifested in human society and centers around the family, society, community, nation and world with a view to gross bodily comfort. Above these gross materialists are the mental speculators who hover aloft in the mental spheres, and their occupational duties involve making poetry and philosophy or propagating some ism with the same aim of selfishness limited to the body and the mind. But above the body and mind is the dormant spirit soul whose absence from the body makes the whole range of bodily and mental selfishness completely null and void. But less intelligent people have no information of the needs of the spirit soul.

Because foolish people have no information of the soul and how it is beyond the purview of the body and mind, they are not satisfied in the performance of their occupational duties. The question of the satisfaction of the self is raised herein. The self is beyond the gross body and subtle mind. He is the potent active principle of the body and mind. Without knowing the need of the dormant soul, one cannot be happy simply with emolument of the body and mind. The body and the mind are but superfluous outer coverings of the spirit soul. The spirit soul’s needs must be fulfilled. Simply by cleansing the cage of the bird, one does not satisfy the bird. One must actually know the needs of the bird himself.

The need of the spirit soul is that he wants to get out of the limited sphere of material bondage and fulfill his desire for complete freedom. He wants to get out of the covered walls of the greater universe. He wants to see the free light and the spirit. That complete freedom is achieved when he meets the complete spirit, the Personality of Godhead. There is a dormant affection for God within everyone; spiritual existence is manifested through the gross body and mind in the form of perverted affection for gross and subtle matter. Therefore we have to engage ourselves in occupational engagements that will evoke our divine consciousness. This is possible only by hearing and chanting the divine activities of the Supreme Lord, and any occupational activity which does not help one to achieve attachment for hearing and chanting the transcendental message of Godhead is said herein to be simply a waste of time. This is because other occupational duties (whatever ism they may belong to) cannot give liberation to the soul. Even the activities of the salvationists are considered to be useless because of their failure to pick up the fountainhead of all liberties. The gross materialist can practically see that his material gain is limited only to time and space, either in this world or in the other. Even if he goes up to the Svargaloka, he will find no permanent abode for his hankering soul. The hankering soul must be satisfied by the perfect scientific process of perfect devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Varṇāśrama-dharma of the human being, which does not produce attraction for topics of the Lord, is only wasted effort.
Commentary

Why is dharma in the form of varṇāśrama not considered to be paro dharma? This verse answers. That dharma undertaken by men—brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas, vaiśyas and śūdras which does not produce attraction for talks about the Supreme Lord is completely useless. The śruti says karmaṇā pirtṛ-loke: by performance of varṇāśrama duties one goes to Pitṛ-loka in the material world. (Bṛhad Āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.5) Performance of varṇāśrama duties does not produce attraction for the Lord. This is clear from Nārada’s statements in the Fourth Canto:

kiṁ janmabhis tribhir veha śaukra-sāvitra-yājṣikaiḥ karmabhir vā trayī-proktaiḥ puṁso ’pi vibudhāyuṣā

Without that service what is the use of taking three births by semen, upanayanam and initiation. What is the use of ritual acts mentioned in the Vedas? What is the use of the lifespan of a devatā for a human? SB 4.31.10

kiṁ vā yogena sāṅkhyena nyāsa-svādhyāyayor api kiṁ vā śreyobhir anyaiś ca na yatrātma-prado hariḥ

What is the use of yoga, sāṅkhya, sannyāsa, study of the Vedas, other auspicious acts, in which the Lord does not give realization of himself? SB 4.31.12

Because it does not produce attraction for topics about the Lord it is merely useless endeavor. Because of the temporary nature of the results of performing varṇāśrama duties such as attainment of Pitṛ-loka, one should give up those duties (sva-dharma) and perform the paro dharma mentioned in the previous verse consisting of hearing and chanting about the Lord.

However it is also said:

asmiḹ loke vartamānaḥ sva-dharma-stho ’naghaḥ śuciḥ | jṣānaṁ viśuddham āpnoti mad-bhaktiṁ ca yadṛcchayā ||

One who is situated in his prescribed duty, free from sinful activities and cleansed of material contamination, in this very life obtains transcendental knowledge or, by fortune, devotional service unto Me. SB 11.20.11

The Lord himself says that karma is the cause of bhakti. How can you say that bhakti is without cause?

That is true. It can be explained in that statement that karma gives rise to jṣāna, but does not directly produce bhakti. That is understood from the use of the word yadṛcchayā (by itself) in the verse. Pure bhakti is independent (yadṛcchayā), indifferent to other processes. If by good fortune it happens to appear in a person, then he attains attraction for the Lord’s topics. The meaning of yadṛcchayā is “by itself.” By explaining the verse in another way, the self-manifesting nature of bhakti would be lost. Therefore such meanings are rejected. Thus even niṣkāma-karma is not the cause of bhakti. That is said in the present verse. Paro dharma is understood from verse 1.2.6 (sa vai puṁsām paro dharmaḥ). All dharmas other than that, undertaken as one’s duties (svanuṣṭhitaḥ), even if they are niṣkāma, and which do not produce affection (ratim) for topics about the Lord, are only useless labor. The word yadi here indicates disgust generated from the wasted labor. Medinī says yadi indicates disgust or doubt.

Or yadi can be used to express doubt where no doubt exists as in the example yadi vedāḥ pramāṇam: if the Vedas are proof. Or in the sentence dhatte padam tvam avitā yadi vighna-mūrdhni: You, the protector, place your foot on the head of obstacles, yadi expresses certainty. This is how Śrīdhara Svāmī explains yadi.

Another meaning is as follows. It is said that from this varṇāśrama sometimes attraction for topics of the Lord does arise. That is true. Because one cannot attain the results of dharma without such affection for the Lord’s topics, that affection is present but that is an appearance only, not genuine. If activities of varṇāśrama-dharma, whether kāmya (for fulfilling personal desires) or nitya (daily obligations), do not produce affection for the Lord’s topics, they are a waste of labor (for no material results will come). For farmers, agriculture must generate affection for the king; otherwise they cannot attain its results. Intelligent people, seeing that there will be no results without attraction for those topics, perform dharma that produces affection for the topics of the Lord. If the foolish perform the duties without producing affection for topics of the Lord, they labor for nothing. Just as it is wasted labor if one cannot attain the results of farming because of lack of loyalty to the king, it is wasted labor if one cannot get the results of Svarga and knowledge because of lack of devotion to the Lord.

naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ na śobhate jṣānam alaṁ niraṣjanam kutaḥ punaḥ śaśvad abhadram īśvara na cārpitaṁ karma yad apy akāraṇam

Knowledge of self-realization, even though free from all material affinity, does not look well if devoid of a conception of the Infallible [God]. What, then, is the use of fruitive activities, which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature, if they are not utilized for the devotional service of the Lord? SB 1.5.12

Just as affection for the king arises only because of attachment to agriculture, so attraction to topics of the Lord arises only because of attachment to varṇāśrama- dharma and its material results. Therefore that attachment to the topics of the Lord is not genuine. Prahlāda has expressed a pure relationship:

ahaṁ tv akāmas tvad-bhaktas tvaṁ ca svāmy anapāśrayaḥ nānyathehāvayor artho rāja-sevakayor iva

I am your servant, not desiring benefits, and you are my master, without dependence on service. Our relationship should not be anything else--like that of king and servant. . SB 7.10.6

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.9

↗
ధర్మస్య హ్యాపవర్గ్యస్య నార్థోఽర్థాయోపకల్పతే । నార్థస్య ధర్మైకాన్తస్య కామో లాభాయ హి స్మృత: ॥ ౯ ॥
dharmasya hy āpavargyasya
[dharmasya hy aapavargyasya]
nārtho ’rthāyopakalpate
[naartho ’rthaayopakalpate]
nārthasya dharmaikāntasya
[naarthasya dharmaikaantasya]
kāmo lābhāya hi smṛtaḥ
[kaamo laabhaaya hi smritah]
dharmasya — occupational engagement hi — certainly āpavargyasya — ultimate liberation na — not arthaḥ — end arthāya — for material gain upakalpate — is meant for na — neither arthasya — of material gain dharma-eka-antasya — for one who is engaged in the ultimate occupational service kāmaḥ — sense gratification lābhāya — attainment of hi — exactly smṛtaḥ — is described by the great sages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharmasya hy āpavargyasya
dharmasya
occupational engagement
nārtho ’rthāyopakalpate
nārthasya dharmaikāntasya
kāmo lābhāya hi smṛtaḥ
hi
certainly
āpavargyasya
ultimate liberation
na
not
arthaḥ
end
arthāya
for material gain
upakalpate
is meant for
na
neither
arthasya
of material gain
dharma-eka-antasya
for one who is engaged in the ultimate occupational service
kāmaḥ
sense gratification
lābhāya
attainment of
hi
exactly
smṛtaḥ
is described by the great sages.
All occupational engagements are certainly meant for ultimate liberation. They should never be performed for material gain. Furthermore, according to sages, one who is engaged in the ultimate occupational service should never use material gain to cultivate sense gratification.

We have already discussed that pure devotional service to the Lord is automatically followed by perfect knowledge and detachment from material existence. But there are others who consider that all kinds of different occupational engagements, including those of religion, are meant for material gain. The general tendency of any ordinary man in any part of the world is to gain some material profit in exchange for religious or any other occupational service. Even in the Vedic literatures, for all sorts of religious performances an allurement of material gain is offered, and most people are attracted by such allurements or blessings of religiosity. Why are such so-called men of religion allured by material gain? Because material gain can enable one to fulfill desires, which in turn satisfy sense gratification. This cycle of occupational engagements includes so-called religiosity followed by material gain and material gain followed by fulfillment of desires. Sense gratification is the general way for all sorts of fully occupied men. But in the statement of Sūta Gosvāmī, as per the verdict of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, this is nullified by the present śloka.

One should not engage himself in any sort of occupational service for material gain only. Nor should material gain be utilized for sense gratification. How material gain should be utilized is described as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Material results are not suitable as the goal for the person dedicated to higher spiritual goals. Attainment of material assets is not the desire of the person who is dedicated to the higher path.
Commentary

There are four types of persons in this world: karmīs, jṣānīs, yogīs and bhaktas. It is said dharmād arthaś ca kāmaś ca sa kim arthaṁ na sevyate: from performance of dharma comes artha and kāma. Can dharma not be used for any purpose? (Mahābhārata 18.5.49) Thus, the result of performance of dharma is artha, acquisition of material results. The result of material acquisition is desire, kāma. The result of kāma is pleasure of the senses. When the senses are pleased, for further gain of pleasure, one executes the sequence starting with dharma again. This is true for the karmīs, but does not apply to the jṣānīs, yogīs and devotees. That is explained in this verse.

Dharma in this verse refers to control of mind and senses (śama, dama etc.) for the jṣānī, to yama and niyama etc. for the yogīs and to hearing, chanting and other devotional processes for the devotee. Though the material results appear by executing all these processes, they are not suitable as the goal (arthāya na kalpate), for after examining the nature of material gain, one becomes detached from it. That is indicated in text by the word āpavargyasya. Apavargya means “having the goal of apavarga.” The vowel is lengthened without a change in meaning, as in such words as svarga. Thus from apavarga comes apavargya and then āpavargya. It should be understood that by these processes apavarga is the concomitant result of practice. That apavarga is liberation for the jṣānī and yogī, and prema-bhakti for the devotee.

yathā-varṇa-vidhānam apavargaś cāpi bhavati.| yo ’sau bhagavati sarva-bhūtātmany anātmye ’nirukte ’nilayane paramātmani vāsudeve ’nanya-nimitta-bhakti-yoga-lakṣaṇo nānā-gati-nimittāvidyā-granthi-randhana-dvāreṇa yadā hi mahā-puruṣa-puruṣa-prasaṅgaḥ.

In Bhārata-varṣa the many destinations--heavenly, human and hellish--are prescribed to all people, because people take birth according to actions in sattva, rajas and tamas. All these goals are prescribed for the self according to the quality of action, as indicated in the Vedas. Liberation is then achieved. SB 5.19.19-20

sa vai mahā-bhāgavataḥ parīkṣid yenāpavargākhyam adabhra-buddhiḥ jṣānena vaiyāsaki-śabditena bheje khagendra-dhvaja-pāda-mūlam

O Sūta Gosvāmī, please describe those topics of the Lord by which Mahārāja Parīkṣit, whose intelligence was fixed on liberation (apavarga), attained the lotus feet of the Lord, who is the shelter of Garuḍa, the king of birds. Those topics were vibrated by the son of Vyāsa [Śrīla Śukadeva]. SB 1.18.16

As well, in Skanda Purāṇa it is said:

niścalā tvayi bhaktir yā saiva muktir janārdana | muktā eva hi bhaktās te tava viṣṇo yato hare ||

O Janārdana! O Lord! O Viṣṇu! That bhakti which is fixed on you is called liberation, because your devotees are certainly liberated.

Therefore the desire of the avid practitioner should not be for attaining material results (arthasya kamo labhāya na). This is because, for the avid practitioner of apavarga-dharma, the practice itself has its own results. In certain actions the jṣānīs use material assets which are favorable for śama and dama and the yogīs uses material assets which are favorable for yama and niyama. The devotee uses material assets for service to the Lord and his devotees. This is clear.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.10

↗
కామస్య నేన్ద్రియప్రీతిర్లాభో జీవేత యావతా । జీవస్య తత్త్వజిజ్ఞాసా నార్థో యశ్చేహ కర్మభి: ॥ ౧౦ ॥
kāmasya nendriya-prītir
[kaamasya nendriya-preetir]
lābho jīveta yāvatā
[laabho jeeveta yaavataa]
jīvasya tattva-jijṣāsā
[jeevasya tattva-jijshaasaa]
nārtho yaś ceha karmabhiḥ
[naartho yash cheha karmabhih]
kāmasya — of desires na — not indriya — senses prītiḥ — satisfaction lābhaḥ — gain jīveta — self-preservation yāvatā — so much so jīvasya — of the living being tattva — the Absolute Truth jijṣāsā — inquiries na — not arthaḥ — end yaḥ ca iha — whatsoever else karmabhiḥ — by occupational activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāmasya nendriya-prītir
kāmasya
of desires
lābho jīveta yāvatā
jīvasya tattva-jijṣāsā
nārtho yaś ceha karmabhiḥ
na
not
indriya
senses
prītiḥ
satisfaction
lābhaḥ
gain
jīveta
self-preservation
yāvatā
so much so
jīvasya
of the living being
tattva
the Absolute Truth
jijṣāsā
inquiries
na
not
arthaḥ
end
yaḥ ca iha
whatsoever else
karmabhiḥ
by occupational activities.
Life’s desires should never be directed toward sense gratification. One should desire only a healthy life, or self-preservation, since a human being is meant for inquiry about the Absolute Truth. Nothing else should be the goal of one’s works.

The completely bewildered material civilization is wrongly directed towards the fulfillment of desires in sense gratification. In such civilization, in all spheres of life, the ultimate end is sense gratification. In politics, social service, altruism, philanthropy and ultimately in religion or even in salvation, the very same tint of sense gratification is ever-increasingly predominant. In the political field the leaders of men fight with one another to fulfill their personal sense gratification. The voters adore the so-called leaders only when they promise sense gratification. As soon as the voters are dissatisfied in their own sense satisfaction, they dethrone the leaders. The leaders must always disappoint the voters by not satisfying their senses. The same is applicable in all other fields; no one is serious about the problems of life. Even those who are on the path of salvation desire to become one with the Absolute Truth and desire to commit spiritual suicide for sense gratification. But the Bhāgavatam says that one should not live for sense gratification. One should satisfy the senses only insomuch as required for self-preservation, and not for sense gratification. Because the body is made of senses, which also require a certain amount of satisfaction, there are regulative directions for satisfaction of such senses. But the senses are not meant for unrestricted enjoyment. For example, marriage or the combination of a man with a woman is necessary for progeny, but it is not meant for sense enjoyment. In the absence of voluntary restraint, there is propaganda for family planning, but foolish men do not know that family planning is automatically executed as soon as there is search after the Absolute Truth. Seekers of the Absolute Truth are never allured by unnecessary engagements in sense gratification because the serious students seeking the Absolute Truth are always overwhelmed with the work of researching the Truth. In every sphere of life, therefore, the ultimate end must be seeking after the Absolute Truth, and that sort of engagement will make one happy because he will be less engaged in varieties of sense gratification. And what that Absolute Truth is is explained as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
For one who desires apavarga, sense pleasure attained from enjoying sense objects is not the goal as long as one lives. The goal of life is inquiry into the highest truth. What is accomplished by prescribed duties is not the goal.
Commentary

The pleasure of the senses (indriya-pritiḥ) arising from enjoying senses objects is not the goal (lābhaḥ). Rather, as long as one lives (yāvatā jiveta) one should work for the fulfillment of life (apavarga). The pleasure of the senses from enjoyment for the jṣānīs or the yogīs consisting of the secondary results that appear along with the desired results is designated as “results of action.” Since jṣāna and yoga are transformations of niṣkāma-karma, they perceive whatever happiness and distress they experience as results of karma. For the devotees, the pleasure of the senses from sense objects which accompany bhakti however are not called fruits of action (karma) since bhakti is not a transformation of karma. The devotees, however, perceive happiness to be the result of bhakti only. They regard suffering as the mercy of the Lord:

yasyāham anugṛhṇāmi hariṣye tad-dhanaṁ śanaiḥ | tato ’dhanaṁ tyajanty asya svajanā duḥkha-duḥkhitam ||

If I especially favor someone, I gradually deprive him of his wealth. Then the relatives and friends of such a poverty-stricken man abandon him. In this way he suffers one distress after another. SB 10.88.8

Taking this statement of the Lord into consideration, according to the particular case, the devotee’s suffering should be regarded as direct action of the Lord or a result of devotional offenses. The goal of life (jīvasya) is inquiry into the highest truth (tattva-jijṣāsā). What is accomlished (iha) by performance of karmas, such as attaining Svarga, is not the goal.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.11

↗
వదన్తి తత్తత్త్వవిదస్తత్త్వం యజ్జ్ఞానమద్వయమ్ । బ్రహ్మేతి పరమాత్మేతి భగవానితి శబ్ద్యతే ॥ ౧౧ ॥
vadanti tat tattva-vidas
[vadanti tat tattva-vidas]
tattvaṁ yaj jṣānam advayam
[tattvam yaj jshaanam advayam]
brahmeti paramātmeti
[brahmeti paramaatmeti]
bhagavān iti śabdyate
[bhagavaan iti shabdyate]
vadanti — they say tat — that tattva-vidaḥ — the learned souls tattvam — the Absolute Truth yat — which jṣānam — knowledge advayam — nondual brahma iti — known as Brahman paramātmā iti — known as Paramātmā bhagavān iti — known as Bhagavān śabdyate — it so sounded.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vadanti tat tattva-vidas
vadanti
they say
tat
that
tattva-vidaḥ
the learned souls
tattvaṁ yaj jṣānam advayam
tattvam
the Absolute Truth
yat
which
jṣānam
knowledge
advayam
nondual
brahmeti paramātmeti
brahma iti
known as Brahman
paramātmā iti
known as Paramātmā
bhagavān iti śabdyate
bhagavān iti
known as Bhagavān
śabdyate
it so sounded.
Learned transcendentalists who know the Absolute Truth call this nondual substance Brahman, Paramātmā or Bhagavān.

The Absolute Truth is both subject and object, and there is no qualitative difference there. Therefore, Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān are qualitatively one and the same. The same substance is realized as impersonal Brahman by the students of the Upaniṣads, as localized Paramātmā by the Hiraṇyagarbhas or the yogīs, and as Bhagavān by the devotees. In other words, Bhagavān, or the Personality of Godhead, is the last word of the Absolute Truth. Paramātmā is the partial representation of the Personality of Godhead, and impersonal Brahman is the glowing effulgence of the Personality of Godhead, as the sun rays are to the sun-god. Less intelligent students of either of the above schools sometimes argue in favor of their own respective realization, but those who are perfect seers of the Absolute Truth know well that the above three features of the one Absolute Truth are different perspective views seen from different angles of vision.

As it is explained in the first śloka of the First Chapter of the Bhāgavatam, the Supreme Truth is self-sufficient, cognizant and free from the illusion of relativity. In the relative world the knower is different from the known, but in the Absolute Truth both the knower and the known are one and the same thing. In the relative world the knower is the living spirit or superior energy, whereas the known is inert matter or inferior energy. Therefore, there is a duality of inferior and superior energy, whereas in the absolute realm both the knower and the known are of the same superior energy. There are three kinds of energies of the supreme energetic. There is no difference between the energy and energetic, but there is a difference of quality of energies. The absolute realm and the living entities are of the same superior energy, but the material world is inferior energy. The living being in contact with the inferior energy is illusioned, thinking he belongs to the inferior energy. Therefore there is the sense of relativity in the material world. In the Absolute there is no such sense of difference between the knower and the known, and therefore everything there is absolute.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The knowers of truth call this truth advayam-jṣānam, the supreme conscious being, who is called brahman by the jṣānīs, Paramātmā by the yogīs and Bhagavān by the devotees.
Commentary

What is that highest truth (tattvam)? This verse explains. It is advaya-jṣānam. And what is jṣānam? It is called brahman. What the jṣānīs call brahman is jṣānam. According to them it is without form, without distinction of knower and known, a condition of consciousness alone.

This jṣānam is called Paramātmā by the yogīs. This jṣānam is advaitam because of oneness between him and his śaktis--jīva and prakṛti, because as cause he pervades the effect, this universe, the prison-like abode, and because Paramātmā is non-different from his form and abodes through particularization of his consciousness aspect. According to the yogīs, the form of Paramātmā is still pure jṣāna because his form is also the same knowledge. Even though he is pure jṣāna, Paramātmā is also the shelter of particularization of jṣāna, because he performs functions such as acting as the witness. Paramātmā is just like the sun or a lamp. Though the sun is the very form of light, it is also the possessor of luminosity. Thus there is no contradiction. Paramātmā is understood to have a form as shown in the following verse:

kecit sva-dehāntar-hṛdayāvakāśe prādeśa-mātraṁ puruṣaṁ vasantam catur-bhujaṁ kaṣja-rathāṅga-śaṅkha-gadā-dharaṁ dhāraṇayā smaranti

Others conceive of the Personality of Godhead residing within the body in the region of the heart and measuring only eight inches, with four hands carrying a lotus, a wheel of a chariot, a conch shell and a club respectively. SB 2.2.8

This jṣānam is called Bhagavān by the devotees. He is called advayam because material energy is the śakti (and śakti and śaktimān are one); because he is completely different from the jīvas in illusion (advayam meaning unique); because the jīvas are distinct aṁśas or parts of the whole (identity of part and whole); and because no one is in the same position as the Lord (advayam meaning having no equal). According to the devotees, though Bhagavān is pure jṣāna, as the yogīs and jṣānīs agree, he has a form possessing the six qualities described by the word bhaga, which is non-material, because the form is pure consciousness. Thus it is said in the Viṣṇu Purāṇa:

aiśvaryasya samagrasya vīryasya yaśasaḥ śriyaḥ | jṣāna-vairāggyayoś caiva ṣaṇṇāṁ bhaga itīṅganā ||

Bhaga of six parts is defined as: complete control, complete influence, complete excellent qualities of body, mind and words, complete beauty or wealth, complete knowledge, and complete detachment from worldly affairs. Viṣṇu Purāṇa 6.74

jṣāna-śakti-balaiśvarya-vīrya-tejāṁsy aśeṣataḥ | bhagavac-chabda-vācyāni vinā heyair guṇādibhiḥ ||

The word Bhagavān means to be endowed with unlimited knowledge, sense power, bodily strength, power of control, influence and beauty without inferior guṇas. Viṣṇu Purāṇa 6.5.79

Though he is situated within and without in various forms of pure consciousness with two or four hands, and though there is eternally a difference between himself and the jīva as served and servant, he is still advaya or one. That the difference between jīva and the Lord is eternal is stated in the Skanda Purāṇa: na cyavante hi mad-bhaktā mahatyāṁ pralayād api: my devotees are not destroyed even at the time of pralaya. The word advayam negates any conception of difference, since one must consider non-difference between the Lord and his śaktis, spiritual actions, and abodes.

The jṣānī who selects the general form of the Lord is qualified for brahman. The yogī who accepts the Lord as the soul within all beings, who possesses qualities, and who is different from the jīva, is qualified for realizing Paramātmā. The devotee who accepts the Lord — who possesses an inconceivable and infinite form of knowledge and bliss, with infinite qualities and pastimes — is qualified for realizing Bhagavān. Actually he alone exists. This is shown in the following verses:

aho bhāgyam aho bhāgyaṁ nanda-gopa-vrajaukasām yan-mitraṁ paramānandaṁ pūrṇaṁ brahma sanātanam

How greatly fortunate are Nanda Mahārāja, the cowherd men and all the other inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi! There is no limit to their good fortune, because the Absolute Truth, the source of transcendental bliss, the eternal Supreme Brahman, has become their friend. SB 10.14.32

kṛṣṇāya vāsudevāya haraye paramātmane praṇata-kleśa-nāśāya govindāya namo namaḥ

Again and again we offer our obeisances unto Lord Kṛṣṇa, Hari, the son of Vasudeva. That Supreme Paramātmā, Govinda, vanquishes the suffering of all who surrender to Him. SB 10.73.16

madīyaṁ mahimānaṁ ca paraṁ brahmeti śabditam vetsyasy anugṛhītaṁ me sampraśnair vivṛtaṁ hṛdi

By my mercy, you will realize my power known as the impersonal Brahman, which will be disclosed in your heart through questions and answers. SB 8.24.38

brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭhāham

I am the basis of brahman. BG 14.27

viṣṭabhyāham idaṁ krṭsnam ekāṁśena sthito jagat

I pervade this universe by my one portion, Paramātmā. BG 10.42

This is also shown by the attainment of prema for the worshippers of Bhagavān. Because the worshippers of brahman and Paramātmā do not attain prema, it can be seen that Bhagavān is the root of the other forms, though Bhagavān is both brahman and Paramātmā. The yogī worshipping Paramātmā is superior to the jṣānīs who worship the brahman. But the worshipper of Bhagavān is superior to the yogīs. This hierarchy is seen in the Gītā:

tapasvibhyo ’dhiko yogī jṣānibhyo ’pi mato ’dhikaḥ | karmibhyaś cādhiko yogī tasmād yogī bhavārjuna ||

yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntar-ātmanā | śraddhāvān bhajate yo māṁ sa me yuktatamo mataḥ ||

According to me, the yogī is better than the tapasvī, better than the jṣānī, and better than the karma-yogī. Therefore be a yogī, Arjuna. But I consider he who worships me with faith, with mind attached to me, to be greater than all types of yogīs. BG 6.46-47

Rāmānujācārya explains that the possessive case (of the yogīs--yogīnām) actually means the ablative case (than the yogīs).

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.12

↗
తచ్ఛ్రద్దధానా మునయో జ్ఞానవైరాగ్యయుక్తయా । పశ్యన్త్యాత్మని చాత్మానం భక్త్యా శ్రుతగృహీతయా ॥ ౧౨ ॥
tac chraddadhānā munayo
[tach chraddadhaanaa munayo]
jṣāna-vairāgya-yuktayā
[jshaana-vairaagya-yuktayaa]
paśyanty ātmani cātmānaṁ
[pashyanty aatmani chaatmaanam]
bhaktyā śruta-gṛhītayā
[bhaktyaa shruta-griheetayaa]
tat — that śraddadhānāḥ — seriously inquisitive munayaḥ — sages jṣāna — knowledge vairāgya — detachment yuktayā — well equipped with paśyanti — see ātmani — within himself ca — and ātmānam — the Paramātmā bhaktyā — in devotional service śruta — the Vedas gṛhītayā — well received.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tac chraddadhānā munayo
tat
that
jṣāna-vairāgya-yuktayā
paśyanty ātmani cātmānaṁ
bhaktyā śruta-gṛhītayā
śraddadhānāḥ
seriously inquisitive
munayaḥ
sages
jṣāna
knowledge
vairāgya
detachment
yuktayā
well equipped with
paśyanti
see
ātmani
within himself
ca
and
ātmānam
the Paramātmā
bhaktyā
in devotional service
śruta
the Vedas
gṛhītayā
well received.
The seriously inquisitive student or sage, well equipped with knowledge and detachment, realizes that Absolute Truth by rendering devotional service in terms of what he has heard from the Vedānta-śruti.

The Absolute Truth is realized in full by the process of devotional service to the Lord, Vāsudeva, or the Personality of Godhead, who is the full-fledged Absolute Truth. Brahman is His transcendental bodily effulgence, and Paramātmā is His partial representation. As such, Brahman or Paramātmā realization of the Absolute Truth is but a partial realization. There are four different types of human beings — the karmīs, the jṣānīs, the yogīs and the devotees. The karmīs are materialistic, whereas the other three are transcendental. The first-class transcendentalists are the devotees who have realized the Supreme Person. The second-class transcendentalists are those who have partially realized the plenary portion of the Absolute Person. And the third-class transcendentalists are those who have barely realized the spiritual focus of the Absolute Person. As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā and other Vedic literatures, the Supreme Person is realized by devotional service, which is backed by full knowledge and detachment from material association. We have already discussed the point that devotional service is followed by knowledge and detachment from material association. As Brahman and Paramātmā realization are imperfect realizations of the Absolute Truth, so the means of realizing Brahman and Paramātmā, i.e., the paths of jṣāna and yoga, are also imperfect means of realizing the Absolute Truth. Devotional service, which is based on the foreground of full knowledge combined with detachment from material association and which is fixed by the aural reception of the Vedānta-śruti, is the only perfect method by which the seriously inquisitive student can realize the Absolute Truth. Devotional service is not, therefore, meant for the less intelligent class of transcendentalist. There are three classes of devotees, namely first, second, and third class. The third-class devotees, or the neophytes, who have no knowledge and are not detached from material association, but who are simply attracted by the preliminary process of worshiping the Deity in the temple, are called material devotees. Material devotees are more attached to material benefit than transcendental profit. Therefore, one has to make definite progress from the position of material devotional service to the second-class devotional position. In the second-class position, the devotee can see four principles in the devotional line, namely the Personality of Godhead, His devotees, the ignorant and the envious. One has to raise himself at least to the stage of a second-class devotee and thus become eligible to know the Absolute Truth.

A third-class devotee, therefore, has to receive the instructions of devotional service from the authoritative sources of Bhāgavata. The number one Bhāgavata is the established personality of devotee, and the other Bhāgavatam is the message of Godhead. The third-class devotee therefore has to go to the personality of devotee in order to learn the instructions of devotional service. Such a personality of devotee is not a professional man who earns his livelihood by the business of Bhāgavatam. Such a devotee must be a representative of Śukadeva Gosvāmī, like Sūta Gosvāmī, and must preach the cult of devotional service for the all-around benefit of all people. A neophyte devotee has very little taste for hearing from the authorities. Such a neophyte devotee makes a show of hearing from the professional man to satisfy his senses. This sort of hearing and chanting has spoiled the whole thing, so one should be very careful about the faulty process. The holy messages of Godhead, as inculcated in the Bhagavad-gītā or in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, are undoubtedly transcendental subjects, but even though they are so, such transcendental matters are not to be received from the professional man, who spoils them as the serpent spoils milk simply by the touch of his tongue.

A sincere devotee must, therefore, be prepared to hear the Vedic literature like the Upaniṣads, Vedānta and other literatures left by the previous authorities or Gosvāmīs, for the benefit of his progress. Without hearing such literatures, one cannot make actual progress. And without hearing and following the instructions, the show of devotional service becomes worthless and therefore a sort of disturbance in the path of devotional service. Unless, therefore, devotional service is established on the principles of śruti, smṛti, purāṇa or paṣcarātra authorities, the make-show of devotional service should at once be rejected. An unauthorized devotee should never be recognized as a pure devotee. By assimilation of such messages from the Vedic literatures, one can see the all-pervading localized aspect of the Personality of Godhead within his own self constantly. This is called samādhi.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The seriously inquisitive student or sage, well equipped with knowledge and detachment, realizes that Absolute Truth by rendering devotional service after hearing from guru.
Commentary

This verse describes the practice to realize that tattva. The sages (munayaḥ) — the jṣānīs cultivating contemplation, the yogīs and the devotees — see that jṣāna of three forms by bhakti. Those who conceive of jṣāna as brahman realize (paśyanti) the jīva (ātmānam) as the Lord (ātmani). (tat tvam asi: You, jīva, are that, the Lord.) Those who conceive of the Lord as Paramātmā see through meditation the lord in the heart (ātmānam) in their heart (ātmani). Those who conceive of Bhagavān see Bhagavān (ātmānam) in the mind (ātmani) and also directly in front of them (ca), and taste the sweetness of the Lord with their very eyes. The sages realize their form of the Lord by bhakti, which is first heard from the guru (śruta) and then practiced (gṛhītayā).

The word bhaktyā is used with its conventional meaning, indicating hearing and chanting about the Supreme Lord, Bhagavān. The worshippers of brahman and Paramātmā must also perform bhakti directed to Bhagavān in order to perfect their own sādhanas. Jṣāna and vairāgya mentioned in this verse are the two sādhanas for the jṣānīs and yogīs only. For the devotee these two arise only from bhakti and indicate the loving nature of bhakti (because he loves the Lord he strives to know the Lord and shows distaste for everything else), since separate cultivation of jṣāna and vairāgya are forbidden in pure bhakti:

tasmān mad-bhakti-yuktasya yogino vai mad-ātmanaḥ | na jṣānaṁ na ca vairāgyaṁ prāyaḥ śreyo bhaved iha ||

Therefore, for a devotee engaged in my loving service, with mind fixed on me, the cultivation of knowledge and renunciation is generally not the means of achieving the highest perfection within this world. SB 11.20.31

Or by mentioning jṣāna, vairāgya and bhakti, the verse can express the idea that the devotees can realize through bhakti all the three aspects of the Lord: brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān. Some who have that particular faith (tac craddhadhānāḥ) develop the desire to realize all the three forms. Then, by bhakti, they can see all the three forms. Thus the goals of the sādhanas of jṣāna and yoga for realizing brahman and Paramātmā will be accomplished only by bhakti.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.13

↗
అత: పుమ్భిర్ద్విజశ్రేష్ఠా వర్ణాశ్రమవిభాగశ: । స్వనుష్ఠితస్య ధర్మస్య సంసిద్ధిర్హరితోషణమ్ ॥ ౧౩ ॥
ataḥ pumbhir dvija-śreṣṭhā
[atah pumbhir dvija-shreshthaa]
varṇāśrama-vibhāgaśaḥ
[varnaashrama-vibhaagashah]
svanuṣṭhitasya dharmasya
[svanushthitasya dharmasya]
saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam
[samsiddhir hari-toshanam]
ataḥ — so pumbhiḥ — by the human being dvija-śreṣṭhāḥ — O best among the twice-born varṇa-āśrama — the institution of four castes and four orders of life vibhāgaśaḥ — by the division of svanuṣṭhitasya — of one’s own prescribed duties dharmasya — occupational saṁsiddhiḥ — the highest perfection hari — the Personality of Godhead toṣaṇam — pleasing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ataḥ pumbhir dvija-śreṣṭhā
ataḥ
so
pumbhiḥ
by the human being
dvija-śreṣṭhāḥ
O best among the twice-born
varṇāśrama-vibhāgaśaḥ
varṇa-āśrama
the institution of four castes and four orders of life
vibhāgaśaḥ
by the division of
svanuṣṭhitasya dharmasya
svanuṣṭhitasya
of one’s own prescribed duties
dharmasya
occupational
saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam
saṁsiddhiḥ
the highest perfection
hari
the Personality of Godhead
toṣaṇam
pleasing.
O best among the twice-born, it is therefore concluded that the highest perfection one can achieve by discharging the duties prescribed for one’s own occupation according to caste divisions and orders of life is to please the Personality of Godhead.

Human society all over the world is divided into four castes and four orders of life. The four castes are the intelligent caste, the martial caste, the productive caste and the laborer caste. These castes are classified in terms of one’s work and qualification and not by birth. Then again there are four orders of life, namely the student life, the householder’s life, the retired and the devotional life. In the best interest of human society there must be such divisions of life, otherwise no social institution can grow in a healthy state. And in each and every one of the above-mentioned divisions of life, the aim must be to please the supreme authority of the Personality of Godhead. This institutional function of human society is known as the system of varṇāśrama-dharma, which is quite natural for the civilized life. The varṇāśrama institution is constructed to enable one to realize the Absolute Truth. It is not for artificial domination of one division over another. When the aim of life, i.e., realization of the Absolute Truth, is missed by too much attachment for indriya-prīti, or sense gratification, as already discussed hereinbefore, the institution of the varṇāśrama is utilized by selfish men to pose an artificial predominance over the weaker section. In the Kali-yuga, or in the age of quarrel, this artificial predominance is already current, but the saner section of the people know it well that the divisions of castes and orders of life are meant for smooth social intercourse and high-thinking self-realization and not for any other purpose.

Herein the statement of Bhāgavatam is that the highest aim of life or the highest perfection of the institution of the varṇāśrama-dharma is to cooperate jointly for the satisfaction of the Supreme Lord. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (4.13) .

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of the brāhmaṇas! The complete perfection of dharma, according to divisions of varṇāśrama by men, is pleasing the Lord.
Commentary

Verse 1.2.8 has already stated that varṇāśrama duties (dharmaḥ svānuṣṭhitaḥ) are wasted endeavor. And even jṣāna and yoga, devoid of bhakti, are wasted endeavor.

śreyaḥ-sṛtiṁ bhaktim udasya te vibho kliśyanti ye kevala-bodha-labdhaye teṣām asau kleśala eva śiṣyate nānyad yathā sthūla-tuṣāvaghātinām

My dear Lord, devotional service unto You is the best path for self-realization. If someone gives up that path and engages in the cultivation of speculative knowledge, he will simply undergo a troublesome process and will not achieve his desired result. As a person who beats an empty husk of wheat cannot get grain, one who simply speculates cannot achieve self-realization. His only gain is trouble. SB 10.14.4

naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ na śobhate jṣānam alaṁ niraṣjanam kutaḥ punaḥ śaśvad abhadram īśvara na cārpitaṁ karma yad apy akāraṇam

Knowledge of self-realization, even though free from all material affinity, does not look well if devoid of a conception of the Infallible [God]. What, then, is the use of fruitive activities, which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature, if they are not utilized for the devotional service of the Lord? SB 1.5.12

pureha bhūman bahavo ’pi yoginas tvad-arpitehā nija-karma-labdhayā vibudhya bhaktyaiva kathopanītayā prapedire ’ṣjo ’cyuta te gatiṁ parām

O almighty Lord, in the past many yogīs in this world achieved the platform of devotional service by offering all their endeavors unto You and faithfully carrying out their prescribed duties. Through such devotional service, perfected by the processes of hearing and chanting about You, they came to understand You, O infallible one, and could easily surrender to You and achieve Your supreme abode. SB 10.14.5

From this chapter it has already been understood that only by pure bhakti, unmixed with karma, jṣāna or yoga, the mind becomes satisfied.

A doubt arises. Is there not some worry in giving up jṣāna and yoga? And in not doing nitya-karmas, is there not the calamity of great sin in omission of action, and ending up in hell? This verse answers. Though jṣāna and yoga have some attraction, they depend on getting their results by performance of bhakti. But bhakti gives its results without the assistance of jṣāna or yoga at all. Therefore if one pleases the Lord by bhakti only, that is the perfection of dharma. The person who does not get for the most part perfection even though performing all the rules and regulations of karma attains perfection directly through bhakti, even though he does not perform the karmas. This is understood from the Lord’s own words:

yat karmabhir yat tapasā jṣāna-vairāgyataś ca yat | yogena dāna-dharmeṇa śreyobhir itarair api ||

sarvaṁ mad-bhakti-yogena mad-bhakto labhate ’ṣjasā | svargāpavargaṁ mad-dhāma kathaṣcid yadi vāṣchati ||

Everything that can be achieved by fruitive activities, penance, knowledge, detachment, mystic yoga, charity, religious duties and all other means of perfecting life is easily achieved by my devotee through loving service unto me. If somehow or other my devotee desires promotion to heaven, liberation, or residence in my abode, he easily achieves such benedictions. SB 11.20.32.-33

Thus the idea that the devotee incurs sin by not performing karmas is discarded.

If dharma is perfected by bhakti, will the performer of dharma still obtain the results of dharma? Yes. If one performs dharma with material desires, one will attain those desires, but if one performs dharma without material desires, one will not attain material results. Gopāla-tāpanī śruti says:

bhaktir asya bhajanam | tad ihāmutropādhi-nairāsyenaivāmuṣmin manaḥ- kalpanam | etad eva ca naiṣkarmyam ||

Bhakti is worship of the Lord, concentrating the mind on Him, renouncing all material desires for enjoyment (upādhi) in this world and the next. It destroys all karmas. Gopāla-tāpanī Upaniṣad 1.15

According to the following verse, since all dharmas are perfected by bhakti, the necessity of the devotees performing dharma is rejected.

yathā taror mūla-niṣecanena tṛpyanti tat-skandha-bhujopaśākhāḥ prāṇopahārāc ca yathendriyāṇāṁ tathaiva sarvārhaṇam acyutejyā

As pouring water on the root of a tree energizes the trunk, branches, twigs and everything else, and as supplying food to the stomach enlivens the senses and limbs of the body, simply worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead through devotional service automatically satisfies the demigods, who are parts of that Supreme Personality. SB 4.31.14

The Lord himself says:

tāvat karmāṇi kurvīta na nirvidyeta yāvatā | mat-kathā-śravaṇādau vā śraddhā yāvan na jāyate ||

As long as one is not satiated by fruitive activity and has not awakened his taste for devotional service by śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ one has to act according to the regulative principles of the Vedic injunctions. SB 11.20.9

ājṣāyaivaṁ guṇān doṣān mayādiṣṭān api svakān dharmān santyajya yaḥ sarvān māṁ bhajeta sa tu sattamaḥ

Having taken complete shelter at My lotus feet, however, a saintly person ultimately renounces such ordinary religious duties and worships Me alone. He is thus considered to be the best among all living entities. SB 11.11.32

And in the Gītā the Lord says:

sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja Give up all dharma and just surrender to me. BG 18.66

Based on these verses, the meaning of the verse yathā toror mūla-niśecanena is as follows. Just as worship of the Lord takes the place of worshiping all devatās, and satisfaction of the Lord is the perfection of performance of varṇāśrama duties, when the Lord is satisfied with his worship, the goal of performing one’s duties including worship of devatās is automatically achieved. In the example, by watering the root of the tree the watering of the branches and leaves takes place automatically. When the pure devotees of Bengal or other places perform a few karmas out of obligation because of pressure from family traditions, this is actually not performance of karmas, and does not give karmic results, because they do not have faith in the worship of devatās. The Lord says:

aśraddhayā hutaṁ dattaṁ tapas taptaṁ kṛtaṁ ca yat | asad ity ucyate pārtha na ca tat pretya no iha ||

O son of Pṛthā, whatever is offered in the fire, whatever is given in charity, whatever is undertaken as austerity, but which is done without faith, is called asat since it bears no result now or in the next life. BG 17.28

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.14

↗
తస్మాదేకేన మనసా భగవాన్ సాత్వతాం పతి: । శ్రోతవ్య: కీర్తితవ్యశ్చ ధ్యేయ: పూజ్యశ్చ నిత్యదా ॥ ౧౪ ॥
tasmād ekena manasā
[tasmaad ekena manasaa]
bhagavān sātvatāṁ patiḥ
[bhagavaan saatvataam patih]
śrotavyaḥ kīrtitavyaś ca
[shrotavyah keertitavyash cha]
dhyeyaḥ pūjyaś ca nityadā
[dhyeyah poojyash cha nityadaa]
tasmāt — therefore ekena — by one manasā — attention of the mind bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead sātvatām — of the devotees patiḥ — protector śrotavyaḥ — is to be heard kīrtitavyaḥ — to be glorified ca — and dhyeyaḥ — to be remembered pūjyaḥ — to be worshiped ca — and nityadā — constantly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmād ekena manasā
tasmāt
therefore
ekena
by one
manasā
attention of the mind
bhagavān sātvatāṁ patiḥ
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
sātvatām
of the devotees
patiḥ
protector
śrotavyaḥ kīrtitavyaś ca
śrotavyaḥ
is to be heard
kīrtitavyaḥ
to be glorified
ca
and
dhyeyaḥ pūjyaś ca nityadā
dhyeyaḥ
to be remembered
pūjyaḥ
to be worshiped
ca
and
nityadā
constantly.
Therefore, with one-pointed attention, one should constantly hear about, glorify, remember and worship the Personality of Godhead, who is the protector of the devotees.

If realization of the Absolute Truth is the ultimate aim of life, it must be carried out by all means. In any one of the above-mentioned castes and orders of life, the four processes, namely glorifying, hearing, remembering and worshiping, are general occupations. Without these principles of life, no one can exist. Activities of the living being involve engagements in these four different principles of life. Especially in modern society, all activities are more or less dependent on hearing and glorifying. Any man from any social status becomes a well-known man in human society within a very short time if he is simply glorified truly or falsely in the daily newspapers. Sometimes political leaders of a particular party are also advertised by newspaper propaganda, and by such a method of glorification an insignificant man becomes an important man — within no time. But such propaganda by false glorification of an unqualified person cannot bring about any good, either for the particular man or for the society. There may be some temporary reactions to such propaganda, but there are no permanent effects. Therefore such activities are a waste of time. The actual object of glorification is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who has created everything manifested before us. We have broadly discussed this fact from the beginning of the “ janmādy asya ” śloka of this Bhāgavatam. The tendency to glorify others or hear others must be turned to the real object of glorification — the Supreme Being. And that will bring happiness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore, with mind dedicated only to bhakti, devoid of karma and jṣāna, one should constantly hear about, glorify and meditate upon the Supreme Lord — the master of the devotees.
Commentary

Because of this, one should worship the Supreme Lord with the mind devoid of the desire to perform karma and jṣāna (ekena manasā).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.15

↗
యదనుధ్యాసినా యుక్తా: కర్మగ్రన్థినిబన్ధనమ్ । ఛిన్దన్తి కోవిదాస్తస్య కో న కుర్యాత్కథారతిమ్ ॥ ౧౫ ॥
yad-anudhyāsinā yuktāḥ
[yad-anudhyaasinaa yuktaah]
karma-granthi-nibandhanam
[karma-granthi-nibandhanam]
chindanti kovidās tasya
[chindanti kovidaas tasya]
ko na kuryāt kathā-ratim
[ko na kuryaat kathaa-ratim]
yat — which anudhyā — remembrance asinā — sword yuktāḥ — being equipped with karma — reactionary work granthi — knot nibandhanam — interknit chindanti — cut kovidāḥ — intelligent tasya — His kaḥ — who na — not kuryāt — shall do kathā — messages ratim — attention.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad-anudhyāsinā yuktāḥ
yat
which
anudhyā
remembrance
asinā
sword
yuktāḥ
being equipped with
karma-granthi-nibandhanam
karma
reactionary work
granthi
knot
nibandhanam
interknit
chindanti kovidās tasya
chindanti
cut
kovidāḥ
intelligent
tasya
His
ko na kuryāt kathā-ratim
kaḥ
who
na
not
kuryāt
shall do
kathā
messages
ratim
attention.
With sword in hand, intelligent men cut through the binding knots of reactionary work [karma] by remembering the Personality of Godhead. Therefore, who will not pay attention to His message?

The contact of the spiritual spark with material elements creates a knot which must be cut if one wants to be liberated from the actions and reactions of fruitive work. Liberation means freedom from the cycle of reactionary work. This liberation automatically follows for one who constantly remembers the transcendental pastimes of the Personality of Godhead. This is because all the activities of the Supreme Lord (His līlā ) are transcendental to the modes of the material energy. They are all-attractive spiritual activities, and therefore constant association with the spiritual activities of the Supreme Lord gradually spiritualizes the conditioned soul and ultimately severs the knot of material bondage.

Liberation from material bondage is, therefore, a by-product of devotional service. Attainment of spiritual knowledge is not sufficient to insure liberation. Such knowledge must be overcoated with devotional service so that ultimately the devotional service alone predominates. Then liberation is made possible. Even the reactionary work of the fruitive workers can lead one to liberation when it is overcoated with devotional service. Karma overcoated with devotional service is called karma-yoga. Similarly, empirical knowledge overcoated with devotional service is called jṣāna-yoga. But pure bhakti-yoga is independent of such karma and jṣāna because it alone can not only endow one with liberation from conditional life but also award one the transcendental loving service of the Lord.

Therefore, any sensible man who is above the average man with a poor fund of knowledge must constantly remember the Personality of Godhead by hearing about Him, by glorifying Him, by remembering Him and by worshiping Him always, without cessation. That is the perfect way of devotional service. The Gosvāmīs of Vṛndāvana, who were authorized by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu to preach the bhakti cult, rigidly followed this rule and made immense literatures of transcendental science for our benefit. They have chalked out ways for all classes of men in terms of the different castes and orders of life in pursuance of the teachings of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and similar other authoritative scriptures.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Who will not develop attraction for topics of the Lord, remembrance of whom, like a sword, will cut the knots of karma?
Commentary

The qualification for bhakti is faith in topics of the Lord. This is illustrated in the following verses:

tāvat karmāṇi kurvīta na nirvidyeta yāvatā mat-kathā-śravaṇādau vā śraddhā yāvan na jāyate

As long as one is not satiated by fruitive activity and has not awakened his taste for devotional service by śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ [SB 7.5.23] one has to act according to the regulative principles of the Vedic injunctions. SB 11.20.9

śraddhālur mat-kathāḥ śṛṇvan su-bhadrā loka-pāvanīḥ gāyann anusmaran karma janma cābhinayan muhuḥ

mad-arthe dharma-kāmārthān ācaran mad-apāśrayaḥ labhate niścalāṁ bhaktiṁ mayy uddhava sanātane

A person with natural faith should constantly hear topics about me, should sing and remember my topics which purify the world, and enact my exploits and birth. He should perform dharma, kāma and artha as service to me. Having taken shelter of me, he will attain permanent bhakti to me, whose form is permanent. SB 11.11.23-24

jāta-śraddho mat-kathāsu nirviṇṇaḥ sarva-karmasu veda duḥkhātmakān kāmān parityāge ’py anīśvaraḥ

tato bhajeta māṁ prītaḥ śraddhālur dṛḍha-niścayaḥ juṣamāṇaś ca tān kāmān duḥkhodarkāṁś ca garhayan

Having developed faith in topics about me and being disgusted with all karmas, he knows that all enjoyments are filled with misery. But he is unable to given them up. Still, with affection for me, with faith and determination, he will continue worshipping me, at the same time SB 11.20.27-28

How does that faith arise? This verse answers. Remembrance of the Lord is a sword. Equipped with that sword (asinā), persons cut the bondage caused by the knot of false ego which ties one up with karma.

Or another meaning is as follows. People tie up small amounts of money in knots of their clothing for the purpose of daily eating by dividing up their savings and spending a little each day. This knot of money for enjoyment is compared to the karmas allotted in this life for enjoyment. Thus the sword of remembering the Lord cuts this knot of prārabdha-karma.

Who will not have attraction for topics concerning the Lord, whose remembrance cuts the knots of karma? Attraction for those topics arises suddenly (in all people, before having faith)! The verse indicates that a person who is more qualified, who has faith, will be even more attracted.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.16

↗
శుశ్రూషో: శ్రద్దధానస్య వాసుదేవకథారుచి: । స్యాన్మహత్సేవయా విప్రా: పుణ్యతీర్థనిషేవణాత్ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
śuśrūṣoḥ śraddadhānasya
[shushrooshoh shraddadhaanasya]
vāsudeva-kathā-ruciḥ
[vaasudeva-kathaa-ruchih]
syān mahat-sevayā viprāḥ
[syaan mahat-sevayaa vipraah]
puṇya-tīrtha-niṣevaṇāt
[punya-teertha-nishevanaat]
śuśrūṣoḥ — one who is engaged in hearing śraddadhānasya — with care and attention vāsudeva — in respect to Vāsudeva kathā — the message ruciḥ — affinity syāt — is made possible mahat-sevayā — by service rendered to pure devotees viprāḥ — O twice-born puṇya-tīrtha — those who are cleansed of all vice niṣevaṇāt — by service.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śuśrūṣoḥ śraddadhānasya
śuśrūṣoḥ
one who is engaged in hearing
śraddadhānasya
with care and attention
vāsudeva-kathā-ruciḥ
vāsudeva
in respect to Vāsudeva
kathā
the message
ruciḥ
affinity
syān mahat-sevayā viprāḥ
syāt
is made possible
mahat-sevayā
by service rendered to pure devotees
viprāḥ
O twice-born
puṇya-tīrtha-niṣevaṇāt
puṇya-tīrtha
those who are cleansed of all vice
niṣevaṇāt
by service.
O twice-born sages, by serving those devotees who are completely freed from all vice, great service is done. By such service, one gains affinity for hearing the messages of Vāsudeva.

The conditioned life of a living being is caused by his revolting against the Lord. There are men called devas, or godly living beings, and there are men called asuras, or demons, who are against the authority of the Supreme Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā (Sixteenth Chapter) a vivid description of the asuras is given in which it is said that the asuras are put into lower and lower states of ignorance life after life and so sink to the lower animal forms and have no information of the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead. These asuras are gradually rectified to God consciousness by the mercy of the Lord’s liberated servitors in different countries according to the supreme will. Such devotees of God are very confidential associates of the Lord, and when they come to save human society from the dangers of godlessness, they are known as the powerful incarnations of the Lord, as sons of the Lord, as servants of the Lord or as associates of the Lord. But none of them falsely claim to be God themselves. This is a blasphemy declared by the asuras, and the demoniac followers of such asuras also accept pretenders as God or His incarnation. In the revealed scriptures there is definite information of the incarnation of God. No one should be accepted as God or an incarnation of God unless he is confirmed by the revealed scriptures.

The servants of God are to be respected as God by the devotees who actually want to go back to Godhead. Such servants of God are called mahātmās, or tīrthas, and they preach according to particular time and place. The servants of God urge people to become devotees of the Lord. They never tolerate being called God. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was God Himself according to the indication of the revealed scriptures, but He played the part of a devotee. People who knew Him to be God addressed Him as God, but He used to block His ears with His hands and chant the name of Lord Viṣṇu. He strongly protested against being called God, although undoubtedly He was God Himself. The Lord behaves so to warn us against unscrupulous men who take pleasure in being addressed as God.

The servants of God come to propagate God consciousness, and intelligent people should cooperate with them in every respect. By serving the servant of God, one can please God more than by directly serving the Lord. The Lord is more pleased when He sees that His servants are properly respected because such servants risk everything for the service of the Lord and so are very dear to the Lord. The Lord declares in the Bhagavad-gītā (18.69) that no one is dearer to Him than one who risks everything to preach His glory. By serving the servants of the Lord, one gradually gets the quality of such servants, and thus one becomes qualified to hear the glories of God. The eagerness to hear about God is the first qualification of a devotee eligible for entering the kingdom of God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇas! Attraction for topics concerning Kṛṣṇa will arise by service to the great devotees, followed by faith, by surrender to the feet of the pure guru, and by the desire to hear.
Commentary

Hear how attraction for topics of the Lord arises! It arises by service to the great devotees, caused by the good fortune of mercy of those great devotees. By that one develops faith (śraddadhānasya). By faith one takes shelter of the feet of pure guru (puṇya-tīrtha-niṣevanāt). According to Amara-koṣa, tīrtha means water worshipped by sages, guru, path and cause. Being eager to hear those topics (śuśrūṣoḥ), he develops taste for those topics.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.17

↗
శ‍ృణ్వతాం స్వకథా: కృష్ణ: పుణ్యశ్రవణకీర్తన: । హృద్యన్త:స్థో హ్యభద్రాణి విధునోతి సుహృత్సతామ్ ॥ ౧౭ ॥
śṛṇvatāṁ sva-kathāḥ kṛṣṇaḥ
[shrinvataam sva-kathaah krishnah]
puṇya-śravaṇa-kīrtanaḥ
[punya-shravana-keertanah]
hṛdy antaḥ stho hy abhadrāṇi
[hridy antah stho hy abhadraani]
vidhunoti suhṛt satām
[vidhunoti suhrit sataam]
śṛṇvatām — those who have developed the urge to hear the message of sva-kathāḥ — His own words kṛṣṇaḥ — the Personality of Godhead puṇya — virtues śravaṇa — hearing kīrtanaḥ — chanting hṛdi antaḥ sthaḥ — within one’s heart hi — certainly abhadrāṇi — desire to enjoy matter vidhunoti — cleanses suhṛt — benefactor satām — of the truthful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śṛṇvatāṁ sva-kathāḥ kṛṣṇaḥ
śṛṇvatām
those who have developed the urge to hear the message of
sva-kathāḥ
His own words
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Personality of Godhead
puṇya-śravaṇa-kīrtanaḥ
puṇya
virtues
śravaṇa
hearing
kīrtanaḥ
chanting
hṛdy antaḥ stho hy abhadrāṇi
hṛdi antaḥ sthaḥ
within one’s heart
hi
certainly
abhadrāṇi
desire to enjoy matter
vidhunoti suhṛt satām
vidhunoti
cleanses
suhṛt
benefactor
satām
of the truthful.
Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, who is the Paramātmā [Supersoul] in everyone’s heart and the benefactor of the truthful devotee, cleanses desire for material enjoyment from the heart of the devotee who has developed the urge to hear His messages, which are in themselves virtuous when properly heard and chanted.

Messages of the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, are nondifferent from Him. Whenever, therefore, offenseless hearing and glorification of God are undertaken, it is to be understood that Lord Kṛṣṇa is present there in the form of transcendental sound, which is as powerful as the Lord personally. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, in His Śikṣāṣṭaka, declares clearly that the holy name of the Lord has all the potencies of the Lord and that He has endowed His innumerable names with the same potency. There is no rigid fixture of time, and anyone can chant the holy name with attention and reverence at his convenience. The Lord is so kind to us that He can be present before us personally in the form of transcendental sound, but unfortunately we have no taste for hearing and glorifying the Lord’s name and activities. We have already discussed developing a taste for hearing and chanting the holy sound. It is done through the medium of service to the pure devotee of the Lord.

The Lord is reciprocally respondent to His devotees. When He sees that a devotee is completely sincere in getting admittance to the transcendental service of the Lord and has thus become eager to hear about Him, the Lord acts from within the devotee in such a way that the devotee may easily go back to Him. The Lord is more anxious to take us back into His kingdom than we can desire. Most of us do not desire at all to go back to Godhead. Only a very few men want to go back to Godhead. But anyone who desires to go back to Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa helps in all respects.

One cannot enter into the kingdom of God unless one is perfectly cleared of all sins. The material sins are products of our desires to lord it over material nature. It is very difficult to get rid of such desires. Women and wealth are very difficult problems for the devotee making progress on the path back to Godhead. Many stalwarts in the devotional line fell victim to these allurements and thus retreated from the path of liberation. But when one is helped by the Lord Himself, the whole process becomes as easy as anything by the divine grace of the Lord.

To become restless in the contact of women and wealth is not an astonishment, because every living being is associated with such things from remote time, practically immemorial, and it takes time to recover from this foreign nature. But if one is engaged in hearing the glories of the Lord, gradually he realizes his real position. By the grace of God such a devotee gets sufficient strength to defend himself from the state of disturbances, and gradually all disturbing elements are eliminated from his mind.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa, who purifies by the processes of hearing and chanting, who is the benefactor of the devotees who hear about him, enters the hearts of the devotees and destroys their sins.
Commentary

Then from hearing with taste, one begins to hear and chant. Then Kṛṣṇa, being situated within, destroys the sins (abhadrāṇi) in the heart. [Note: This is the stage of anartha-nivrṭti.] Kṛṣṇa being situated within refers to the process of smaraṇam, remembering.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.18

↗
నష్టప్రాయేష్వభద్రేషు నిత్యం భాగవతసేవయా । భగవత్యుత్తమశ్లోకే భక్తిర్భవతి నైష్ఠికీ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
naṣṭa-prāyeṣv abhadreṣu
[nashta-praayeshv abhadreshu]
nityaṁ bhāgavata-sevayā
[nityam bhaagavata-sevayaa]
bhagavaty uttama-śloke
[bhagavaty uttama-shloke]
bhaktir bhavati naiṣṭhikī
[bhaktir bhavati naishthikee]
naṣṭa — destroyed prāyeṣu — almost to nil abhadreṣu — all that is inauspicious nityam — regularly bhāgavata — Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, or the pure devotee sevayā — by serving bhagavati — unto the Personality of Godhead uttama — transcendental śloke — prayers bhaktiḥ — loving service bhavati — comes into being naiṣṭhikī — irrevocable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naṣṭa-prāyeṣv abhadreṣu
naṣṭa
destroyed
prāyeṣu
almost to nil
abhadreṣu
all that is inauspicious
nityaṁ bhāgavata-sevayā
nityam
regularly
bhāgavata
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, or the pure devotee
sevayā
by serving
bhagavaty uttama-śloke
bhagavati
unto the Personality of Godhead
uttama
transcendental
śloke
prayers
bhaktir bhavati naiṣṭhikī
bhaktiḥ
loving service
bhavati
comes into being
naiṣṭhikī
irrevocable.
By regular attendance in classes on the Bhāgavatam and by rendering of service to the pure devotee, all that is troublesome to the heart is almost completely destroyed, and loving service unto the Personality of Godhead, who is praised with transcendental songs, is established as an irrevocable fact.

Here is the remedy for eliminating all inauspicious things within the heart, which are considered to be obstacles in the path of self-realization. The remedy is the association of the Bhāgavatas. There are two types of Bhāgavatas, namely the book Bhāgavata and the devotee Bhāgavata. Both the Bhāgavatas are competent remedies, and both of them or either of them can be good enough to eliminate the obstacles. A devotee Bhāgavata is as good as the book Bhāgavata because the devotee Bhāgavata leads his life in terms of the book Bhāgavata and the book Bhāgavata is full of information about the Personality of Godhead and His pure devotees, who are also Bhāgavatas. Bhāgavata book and person are identical.

The devotee Bhāgavata is a direct representative of Bhagavān, the Personality of Godhead. So by pleasing the devotee Bhāgavata one can receive the benefit of the book Bhāgavata. Human reason fails to understand how by serving the devotee Bhāgavata or the book Bhāgavata one gets gradual promotion on the path of devotion. But actually these are facts explained by Śrīla Nāradadeva, who happened to be a maidservant’s son in his previous life. The maidservant was engaged in the menial service of the sages, and thus he also came into contact with them. And simply by associating with them and accepting the remnants of foodstuff left by the sages, the son of the maidservant got the chance to become the great devotee and personality Śrīla Nāradadeva. These are the miraculous effects of the association of Bhāgavatas. And to understand these effects practically, it should be noted that by such sincere association of the Bhāgavatas one is sure to receive transcendental knowledge very easily, with the result that he becomes fixed in the devotional service of the Lord. The more progress is made in devotional service under the guidance of the Bhāgavatas, the more one becomes fixed in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. The messages of the book Bhāgavata, therefore, have to be received from the devotee Bhāgavata, and the combination of these two Bhāgavatas will help the neophyte devotee to make progress on and on.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As the impediments to bhakti become generally destroyed by constant service to the devotees and Bhāgavatam, the stage of niṣṭhitā bhakti to Bhagavān, who is praised by the greatest sages, becomes established.
Commentary

Bhāgavata-sevayā means by service to the devotees of Bhagavān and service to (such as hearing) the Śrīmad-bhāgavatam. By serving the devotees and Bhāgavatam, the major portion of nāmāparādhas (abhadreṣu) becomes weak. [Note: In Mādhurya-kadambinī Viśvanāth analyzes the abhadra or anarthas into four types: arising from sin, arising from piety, arising from aparadha and arising from performance of bhakti. The effects of aparādha take longer to destroy and continue in the stage of bhāva.] This weakening of aparādhas continues till the stage of rati (bhāva). Naiṣṭhikī refers to niṣṭhā, where the mind can easily concentrate on the Lord. When the anarthas are for the most part destroyed, the devotee attains the stage of niṣṭhā.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.19

↗
తదా రజస్తమోభావా: కామలోభాదయశ్చ యే । చేత ఏతైరనావిద్ధం స్థితం సత్త్వే ప్రసీదతి ॥ ౧౯ ॥
tadā rajas-tamo-bhāvāḥ
[tadaa rajas-tamo-bhaavaah]
kāma-lobhādayaś ca ye
[kaama-lobhaadayash cha ye]
ceta etair anāviddhaṁ
[cheta etair anaaviddham]
sthitaṁ sattve prasīdati
[sthitam sattve praseedati]
tadā — at that time rajaḥ — in the mode of passion tamaḥ — the mode of ignorance bhāvāḥ — the situation kāma — lust and desire lobha — hankering ādayaḥ — others ca — and ye — whatever they are cetaḥ — the mind etaiḥ — by these anāviddham — without being affected sthitam — being fixed sattve — in the mode of goodness prasīdati — thus becomes fully satisfied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadā rajas-tamo-bhāvāḥ
tadā
at that time
rajaḥ
in the mode of passion
tamaḥ
the mode of ignorance
bhāvāḥ
the situation
kāma-lobhādayaś ca ye
kāma
lust and desire
lobha
hankering
ādayaḥ
others
ca
and
ye
whatever they are
ceta etair anāviddhaṁ
cetaḥ
the mind
etaiḥ
by these
anāviddham
without being affected
sthitaṁ sattve prasīdati
sthitam
being fixed
sattve
in the mode of goodness
prasīdati
thus becomes fully satisfied.
As soon as irrevocable loving service is established in the heart, the effects of nature’s modes of passion and ignorance, such as lust, desire and hankering, disappear from the heart. Then the devotee is established in goodness, and he becomes completely happy.

A living being in his normal constitutional position is fully satisfied in spiritual bliss. This state of existence is called brahma-bhūta or ātmānanda, or the state of self-satisfaction. This self-satisfaction is not like the satisfaction of the inactive fool. The inactive fool is in the state of foolish ignorance, whereas the self-satisfied ātmānandī is transcendental to the material state of existence. This stage of perfection is attained as soon as one is fixed in irrevocable devotional service. Devotional service is not inactivity, but the unalloyed activity of the soul.

The soul’s activity becomes adulterated in contact with matter, and as such the diseased activities are expressed in the form of lust, desire, hankering, inactivity, foolishness and sleep. The effect of devotional service becomes manifest by complete elimination of these effects of passion and ignorance. The devotee is fixed at once in the mode of goodness, and he makes further progress to rise to the position of vasudeva, or the state of unmixed sattva, or śuddha-sattva. Only in this śuddha-sattva state can one always see Kṛṣṇa face to face by dint of pure affection for the Lord.

A devotee is always in the mode of unalloyed goodness; therefore he harms no one. But the nondevotee, however educated he may be, is always harmful. A devotee is neither foolish nor passionate. The harmful, foolish and passionate cannot be devotees of the Lord, however they may advertise themselves as devotees by outward dress. A devotee is always qualified with all the good qualities of God. Quantitatively such qualifications may be different, but qualitatively both the Lord and His devotee are one and the same.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The mind becomes unaffected by lust, greed, anger, hatred and illusion which arise form rajas and tamas. Then the mind becomes fixed in the form of the Lord at the stage of āsakti and becomes satisfied.
Commentary

The mind is not transformed (anāviddham) by the agitations of lust, greed and other qualities such as anger, illusion, and hatred, which arise from (bhāvāḥ) rajas and tamas. This means that by lack of taste for material objects, the state of ruci — the appearance of relishing of hearing, chanting and other processes — arises. In the previous state, the mind was pierced by the sharp arrows of lust and greed etc. How could the mind be satisfied in that state? How could the mind attain real taste for chanting in that state? A person afflicted with pain cannot relish food. After this, the mind becomes fixed (sthitam) in the śuddha-sattva deity of the Lord (sattve). This is the stage of āsakti.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.20

↗
ఏవం ప్రసన్నమనసో భగవద్భక్తియోగత: । భగవత్తత్త్వవిజ్ఞానం ముక్తసఙ్గస్య జాయతే ॥ ౨౦ ॥
evaṁ prasanna-manaso
[evam prasanna-manaso]
bhagavad-bhakti-yogataḥ
[bhagavad-bhakti-yogatah]
bhagavat-tattva-vijṣānaṁ
[bhagavat-tattva-vijshaanam]
mukta-saṅgasya jāyate
[mukta-sangasya jaayate]
evam — thus prasanna — enlivened manasaḥ — of the mind bhagavat-bhakti — the devotional service of the Lord yogataḥ — by contact of bhagavat — regarding the Personality of Godhead tattva — knowledge vijṣānam — scientific mukta — liberated saṅgasya — of the association jāyate — becomes effective.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ prasanna-manaso
evam
thus
prasanna
enlivened
manasaḥ
of the mind
bhagavad-bhakti-yogataḥ
bhagavat-bhakti
the devotional service of the Lord
yogataḥ
by contact of
bhagavat-tattva-vijṣānaṁ
bhagavat
regarding the Personality of Godhead
tattva
knowledge
vijṣānam
scientific
mukta-saṅgasya jāyate
mukta
liberated
saṅgasya
of the association
jāyate
becomes effective.
Thus established in the mode of unalloyed goodness, the man whose mind has been enlivened by contact with devotional service to the Lord gains positive scientific knowledge of the Personality of Godhead in the stage of liberation from all material association.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (7.3) it is said that out of many thousands of ordinary men, one fortunate man endeavors for perfection in life. Mostly men are conducted by the modes of passion and ignorance, and thus they are engaged always in lust, desire, hankerings, ignorance and sleep. Out of many such manlike animals, there is actually a man who knows the responsibility of human life and thus tries to make life perfect by following the prescribed duties. And out of many thousands of such persons who have thus attained success in human life, one may know scientifically about the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. In the same Bhagavad-gītā (18.55) it is also said that scientific knowledge of Śrī Kṛṣṇa is understood only by the process of devotional service ( bhakti-yoga ) .

The very same thing is confirmed herein in the above words. No ordinary man, or even one who has attained success in human life, can know scientifically or perfectly the Personality of Godhead. Perfection of human life is attained when one can understand that he is not the product of matter but is in fact spirit. And as soon as one understands that he has nothing to do with matter, he at once ceases his material hankerings and becomes enlivened as a spiritual being. This attainment of success is possible when one is above the modes of passion and ignorance, or, in other words, when one is actually a brāhmaṇa by qualification. A brāhmaṇa is the symbol of sattva-guṇa, or the mode of goodness. And others, who are not in the mode of goodness, are either kṣatriyas, vaiśyas, śūdras or less than the śūdras. The brahminical stage is the highest stage of human life because of its good qualities. So one cannot be a devotee unless one at least qualifies as a brāhmaṇa. The devotee is already a brāhmaṇa by action. But that is not the end of it. As referred to above, such a brāhmaṇa has to become a Vaiṣṇava in fact to be actually in the transcendental stage. A pure Vaiṣṇava is a liberated soul and is transcendental even to the position of a brāhmaṇa. In the material stage even a brāhmaṇa is also a conditioned soul because although in the brahminical stage the conception of Brahman or transcendence is realized, scientific knowledge of the Supreme Lord is lacking. One has to surpass the brahminical stage and reach the vasudeva stage to understand the Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa. The science of the Personality of Godhead is the subject matter for study by the postgraduate students in the spiritual line. Foolish men, or men with a poor fund of knowledge, do not understand the Supreme Lord, and they interpret Kṛṣṇa according to their respective whims. The fact is, however, that one cannot understand the science of the Personality of Godhead unless one is freed from the contamination of the material modes, even up to the stage of a brāhmaṇa. When a qualified brāhmaṇa factually becomes a Vaiṣṇava, in the enlivened state of liberation he can know what is actually the Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then the mind becomes joyful and satisfied on attaining rati. Finally prema develops, accompanied by the appearance of complete detachment. The devotee then experiences the Lord’ṣ form, qualities, pastimes, powers and sweetness.
Commentary

By this method, with the development of āśakti, with worship of Kṛṣṇa at every moment, rati then appears (prasanna-manasaḥ). Without rati, there could never be constant detachment from objects of material enjoyment, and without constant detachment, there could never be satisfaction of the mind. Then prema to Bhagavān appears (bhagavad-bhakti-yogataḥ). From that arises realization (vijṣānam) of the Lord’s form, qualities, pastimes, powers and sweetness. The desired result of bhakti has thus been explained. Accompanying results were previously mentioned with janayaty āśu variāgyam jṣānam ca yad ahaitukam. Here also they are mentioned with the phrase “appearance of vairāgya” (mukta-saṅgasya).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.21

↗
భిద్యతే హృదయగ్రన్థిశ్ఛిద్యన్తే సర్వసంశయా: । క్షీయన్తే చాస్య కర్మాణి ద‍ృష్ట ఏవాత్మనీశ్వరే ॥ ౨౧ ॥
bhidyate hṛdaya-granthiś
[bhidyate hridaya-granthish]
chidyante sarva-saṁśayāḥ
[chidyante sarva-samshayaah]
kṣīyante cāsya karmāṇi
[ksheeyante chaasya karmaani]
dṛṣṭa evātmanīśvare
[drishta evaatmaneeshvare]
bhidyate — pierced hṛdaya — heart granthiḥ — knots chidyante — cut to pieces sarva — all saṁśayāḥ — misgivings kṣīyante — terminated ca — and asya — his karmāṇi — chain of fruitive actions dṛṣṭe — having seen eva — certainly ātmani — unto the self īśvare — dominating.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhidyate hṛdaya-granthiś
bhidyate
pierced
hṛdaya
heart
granthiḥ
knots
chidyante sarva-saṁśayāḥ
chidyante
cut to pieces
sarva
all
saṁśayāḥ
misgivings
kṣīyante cāsya karmāṇi
kṣīyante
terminated
ca
and
asya
his
karmāṇi
chain of fruitive actions
dṛṣṭa evātmanīśvare
dṛṣṭe
having seen
eva
certainly
ātmani
unto the self
īśvare
dominating.
Thus the knot in the heart is pierced, and all misgivings are cut to pieces. The chain of fruitive actions is terminated when one sees the self as master.

Attaining scientific knowledge of the Personality of Godhead means seeing one’s own self simultaneously. As far as the identity of the living being as spirit self is concerned, there are a number of speculations and misgivings. The materialist does not believe in the existence of the spirit self, and empiric philosophers believe in the impersonal feature of the whole spirit without individuality of the living beings. But the transcendentalists affirm that the soul and the Supersoul are two different identities, qualitatively one but quantitatively different. There are many other theories, but all these different speculations are at once cleared off as soon as Śrī Kṛṣṇa is realized in truth by the process of bhakti-yoga. Śrī Kṛṣṇa is like the sun, and the materialistic speculations about the Absolute Truth are like the darkest midnight. As soon as the Kṛṣṇa sun is arisen within one’s heart, the darkness of materialistic speculations about the Absolute Truth and the living beings is at once cleared off. In the presence of the sun, the darkness cannot stand, and the relative truths that were hidden within the dense darkness of ignorance become clearly manifested by the mercy of Kṛṣṇa, who is residing in everyone’s heart as the Supersoul.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (10.11) the Lord says that in order to show special favor to His pure devotees, He personally eradicates the dense darkness of all misgivings by switching on the light of pure knowledge within the heart of a devotee. Therefore, because of the Personality of Godhead’s taking charge of illuminating the heart of His devotee, certainly a devotee, engaged in His service in transcendental love, cannot remain in darkness. He comes to know everything of the absolute and the relative truths. The devotee cannot remain in darkness, and because a devotee is enlightened by the Personality of Godhead, his knowledge is certainly perfect. This is not the case for those who speculate on the Absolute Truth by dint of their own limited power of approach. Perfect knowledge is called paramparā, or deductive knowledge coming down from the authority to the submissive aural receiver who is bona fide by service and surrender. One cannot challenge the authority of the Supreme and know Him also at the same time. He reserves the right of not being exposed to such a challenging spirit of an insignificant spark of the whole, a spark subjected to the control of illusory energy. The devotees are submissive, and therefore the transcendental knowledge descends from the Personality of Godhead to Brahmā and from Brahmā to his sons and disciples in succession. This process is helped by the Supersoul within such devotees. That is the perfect way of learning transcendental knowledge.

This enlightenment perfectly enables the devotee to distinguish spirit from matter because the knot of spirit and matter is untied by the Lord. This knot is called ahaṅkāra, and it falsely obliges a living being to become identified with matter. As soon as this knot is loosened, therefore, all the clouds of doubt are at once cleared off. One sees his master and fully engages himself in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, making a full termination of the chain of fruitive action. In material existence, a living being creates his own chain of fruitive work and enjoys the good and bad effects of those actions life after life. But as soon as he engages himself in the loving service of the Lord, he at once becomes free from the chain of karma. His actions no longer create any reaction.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Ignorance is cut and all doubts are destroyed. On seeing the Lord in the mind and with the eyes, all karmas are destroyed.
Commentary

The knot in the heart, ignorance, is cut. This is a reflexive verb form (karma-kartari) which indicates that destruction of ignorance is not the main result sought in bhakti. All doubts, such as thinking that the attainment is impossible, are destroyed. Having seen the Lord, who is the soul (ātmani), all karmas are destroyed. Or the Lord, being in the mind (ātmani), and then being seen directly, all karmas are destroyed. Thus both the sphurti of the Lord in the mind and direct appearance to the eyes are indicated.

satāṁ kṛpā mahat-sevā śraddhā guru-padāśrayaḥ | bhajaneṣu spṛhā bhaktir anarthāpagamas tataḥ | niṣṭhā rucir athāsaktī ratiḥ premātha darśanam | harer mādhuryānubhava ity arthāḥ syuś caturdaśe

The fourteen steps are as follows: mercy of devotees, service to devotees, faith, surrender to guru, desire for worship (or hearing), bhakti, clearance of anarthas, niṣṭhā, ruci, āsakti, rati, prema, seeing the Lord, and experiencing the Lord’s sweetness. [Note: This is Viśvanātha’s verse. ]

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.22

↗
అతో వై కవయో నిత్యం భక్తిం పరమయా ముదా । వాసుదేవే భగవతి కుర్వన్త్యాత్మప్రసాదనీమ్ ॥ ౨౨ ॥
ato vai kavayo nityaṁ
[ato vai kavayo nityam]
bhaktiṁ paramayā mudā
[bhaktim paramayaa mudaa]
vāsudeve bhagavati
[vaasudeve bhagavati]
kurvanty ātma-prasādanīm
[kurvanty aatma-prasaadaneem]
ataḥ — therefore vai — certainly kavayaḥ — all transcendentalists nityam — from time immemorial bhaktim — service unto the Lord paramayā — supreme mudā — with great delight vāsudeve — Śrī Kṛṣṇa bhagavati — the Personality of Godhead kurvanti — do render ātma — self prasādanīm — that which enlivens.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ato vai kavayo nityaṁ
ataḥ
therefore
vai
certainly
kavayaḥ
all transcendentalists
nityam
from time immemorial
bhaktiṁ paramayā mudā
bhaktim
service unto the Lord
paramayā
supreme
mudā
with great delight
vāsudeve bhagavati
vāsudeve
Śrī Kṛṣṇa
bhagavati
the Personality of Godhead
kurvanty ātma-prasādanīm
kurvanti
do render
ātma
self
prasādanīm
that which enlivens.
Certainly, therefore, since time immemorial, all transcendentalists have been rendering devotional service to Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, with great delight, because such devotional service is enlivening to the self.

The speciality of devotional service unto the Personality of Godhead Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is specifically mentioned herein. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the svayaṁ-rūpa Personality of Godhead, and all other forms of Godhead, beginning from Śrī Baladeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Vāsudeva, Aniruddha, Pradyumna and Nārāyaṇa and extending to the puruṣa-avatāras, guṇa-avatāras, līlā-avatāras, yugāvatāras and many other thousands of manifestations of the Personality of Godhead, are Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s plenary portions and integrated parts. The living entities are separated parts and parcels of the Personality of Godhead. Therefore Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the original form of Godhead, and He is the last word in the Transcendence. Thus He is more attractive to the higher transcendentalists who participate in the eternal pastimes of the Lord. In forms of the Personality of Godhead other than Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Baladeva, there is no facility for intimate personal contact as in the transcendental pastimes of the Lord at Vrajabhūmi. The transcendental pastimes of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa are not newly accepted, as argued by some less intelligent persons; His pastimes are eternal and are manifested in due course once in a day of Brahmājī, as the sun rises on the eastern horizon at the end of every twenty-four hours.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus the wise constantly perform bhakti - which gives joy to the mind - to Lord Kṛṣṇa with great joy.
Commentary

By saying “with great joy” it is indicated that even at the stage of sādhana-bhakti there are no difficulties.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.23

↗
సత్త్వం రజస్తమ ఇతి ప్రకృతేర్గుణాస్తై- ర్యుక్త: పర: పురుష ఏక ఇహాస్య ధత్తే । స్థిత్యాదయే హరివిరిఞ్చిహరేతి సంజ్ఞా: శ్రేయాంసి తత్ర ఖలు సత్త్వతనోర్నృణాం స్యు: ॥ ౨౩ ॥
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti prakṛter guṇās tair
[sattvam rajas tama iti prakriter gunaas tair]
yuktaḥ paraḥ puruṣa eka ihāsya dhatte
[yuktah parah purusha eka ihaasya dhatte]
sthity-ādaye hari-viriṣci-hareti saṁjṣāḥ
[sthity-aadaye hari-virishchi-hareti samjshaah]
śreyāṁsi tatra khalu sattva-tanor nṛṇāṁ syuḥ
[shreyaamsi tatra khalu sattva-tanor nrinaam syuh]
sattvam — goodness rajaḥ — passion tamaḥ — the darkness of ignorance iti — thus prakṛteḥ — of the material nature guṇāḥ — qualities taiḥ — by them yuktaḥ — associated with paraḥ — transcendental puruṣaḥ — the personality ekaḥ — one iha asya — of this material world dhatte — accepts sthiti-ādaye — for the matter of creation, maintenance and destruction, etc. hari — Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead viriṣci — Brahmā hara — Lord Śiva iti — thus saṁjṣāḥ — different features śreyāṁsi — ultimate benefit tatra — therein khalu — of course sattva — goodness tanoḥ — form nṛṇām — of the human being syuḥ — derived.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti prakṛter guṇās tair
sattvam
goodness
rajaḥ
passion
tamaḥ
the darkness of ignorance
iti
thus
prakṛteḥ
of the material nature
guṇāḥ
qualities
taiḥ
by them
yuktaḥ paraḥ puruṣa eka ihāsya dhatte
yuktaḥ
associated with
paraḥ
transcendental
puruṣaḥ
the personality
ekaḥ
one
iha asya
of this material world
dhatte
accepts
sthity-ādaye hari-viriṣci-hareti saṁjṣāḥ
sthiti-ādaye
for the matter of creation, maintenance and destruction, etc.
hari
Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead
viriṣci
Brahmā
hara
Lord Śiva
śreyāṁsi tatra khalu sattva-tanor nṛṇāṁ syuḥ
iti
thus
saṁjṣāḥ
different features
śreyāṁsi
ultimate benefit
tatra
therein
khalu
of course
sattva
goodness
tanoḥ
form
nṛṇām
of the human being
syuḥ
derived.
The transcendental Personality of Godhead is indirectly associated with the three modes of material nature, namely passion, goodness and ignorance, and just for the material world’s creation, maintenance and destruction He accepts the three qualitative forms of Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Śiva. Of these three, all human beings can derive ultimate benefit from Viṣṇu, the form of the quality of goodness.

That Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, by His plenary parts, should be rendered devotional service, as explained above, is confirmed by this statement. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and all His plenary parts are viṣṇu-tattva, or the Lordship of Godhead. From Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the next manifestation is Baladeva. From Baladeva is Saṅkarṣaṇa, from Saṅkarṣaṇa is Nārāyaṇa, from Nārāyaṇa there is the second Saṅkarṣaṇa, and from this Saṅkarṣaṇa the Viṣṇu puruṣa-avatāras. The Viṣṇu or the Deity of the quality of goodness in the material world is the puruṣa-avatāra known as Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu or Paramātmā. Brahmā is the deity of rajas (passion), and Śiva of ignorance. They are the three departmental heads of the three qualities of this material world. Creation is made possible by Brahmā’s quality of passion and his endeavor, it is maintained by the goodness of Viṣṇu, and when it requires to be destroyed, Lord Śiva does it by the tāṇḍavanṛtya. The materialists and the foolish human beings worship Brahmā and Śiva respectively. But the pure transcendentalists worship the form of goodness, Viṣṇu, in His various forms. Viṣṇu is manifested by His millions and billions of integrated forms and separated forms. The integrated forms are called Godhead, and the separated forms are called the living entities or the jīvas. Both the jīvas and Godhead have their original spiritual forms. Jīvas are sometimes subjected to the control of material energy, but the Viṣṇu forms are always controllers of this energy. When Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead, appears in the material world, He comes to deliver the conditioned living beings who are under the material energy. Such living beings appear in the material world with intentions of being lords, and thus they become entrapped by the three modes of nature. As such, the living entities have to change their material coverings for undergoing different terms of imprisonment. The prison house of the material world is created by Brahmā under instruction of the Personality of Godhead, and at the conclusion of a kalpa the whole thing is destroyed by Śiva. But as far as maintenance of the prison house is concerned, it is done by Viṣṇu, as much as the state prison house is maintained by the state. Anyone, therefore, who wishes to get out of this prison house of material existence, which is full of miseries like repetition of birth, death, disease and old age, must please Lord Viṣṇu for such liberation. Lord Viṣṇu is worshiped by devotional service only, and if anyone has to continue prison life in the material world, he may ask for relative facilities for temporary relief from the different demigods like Śiva, Brahmā, Indra and Varuṇa. No demigod, however, can release the imprisoned living being from the conditioned life of material existence. This can be done only by Viṣṇu. Therefore, the ultimate benefit may be derived from Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The one supreme puruṣa, accepting the guṇas of prakṛti known as sattva, rajas and tamas, for creation, maintenance and destruction, is called Viṣṇu, Brahmā and Śiva. The best results for the devotees will come from Viṣṇu with śuddha-sattva body.
Commentary

It has just been explained that one should perform bhakti alone rather than karma or jṣāna. Similarly one should worship Bhagavān alone, giving up worship of the devatās. That Lord, though one, appears in many forms as avatāra for pastimes. Thus the Tenth Canto says bahu-mūrty-eka-mūrtikam: he is one form and many forms. (SB 10.40.7) The avatāras are of two types: those which are related to the cit-śakti and those related to the māyā-śakti. Those which are related to the cit-śakti, such as Matsya and Kūrma are to be worshipped. Those which are related to the māyā-śakti, through sattva, rajas and tamas, are Viṣṇu, Brahmā and Śiva. Among them, Viṣṇu is to be worshipped. That is stated in this verse.

Even though there is only one puruṣa or ādi-puruṣa in this universe, for creation, maintenance and destruction (sthity-ādaye) of the universe (asya), the Lord, joined with sattva, rajas and tamas, accepts the names Viṣṇu, Brahmā and Śiva. The sandhi in hareti is poetic license. The Lord is described as parama (beyond) because though he is linked with the guṇas, by his inconceivable energy he is situated separately from them, untouched by them. Among those forms, Viṣṇu will bestow the desired results to the devotees (śreyāṁsi). Viṣṇu is addressed as sattva-tanoḥ. By seeing verse 25 in this chapter this can only mean that Viṣṇu possesses a body of viśuddha-sattva, not material sattva. Otherwise there would be a contradiction to other statements in śruti and smṛti :

Sākṣī cetā kevalo nirguṇaś ca Viṣṇu is the one conscious witness, beyond the guṇas. Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.11

Sattvādayo na santīśe yatra ca prākṛtā gunā In Viṣṇu there are no material guṇas. Viṣṇu Purāṇa 1.9.44

Harir hi nirguṇaḥ sākṣāt puruṣaḥ prakṛteḥ paraḥ Viṣṇu is devoid of the guṇas; he is the person beyond matter. SB 10.88.5

Though Viṣṇu is involved with the material sattva-guṇa, he is not at all contaminated by it. Viṣṇu would not take up a material body of sattva, since sattva has the qualities of revelation or knowledge and indifference to enjoyment. Sattva should not eclipse the spiritual manifestation of eternity, knowledge and bliss. Rajas is agitating and causes addition (creation); and tamas is obscuring and causes subtraction (destruction). Thus rajas and tamas will disturb and cover bliss. Thus Brahma and Śiva accept bodies of rajas and tamas because those guṇas eclipse bliss. They have bodies composed of guṇas, whereas Viṣṇu does not. This is the logical explanation.

Viṣṇu is without guṇas since by being the manifest form of sattva, he accepts proximity to sattva. Thus he carries the function of protecting the universe but does this with no contamination of the qualities of material sattva. One cannot say that his existence beyond the guṇas is negated by his participation in the world, because he does not possess material sattva by relationship of contact or inherence. He is situated in sattva only by being next to it. It should be understood however that his protection of the devotees does not arise from sattva but from śuddha-sattva of his svarūpa.

Brahmā is a jīva, since he is Hiraṇyagarbha (with a material body made of mahat-tattva). The distinction between the supreme brahman and Brahmā is based on the context of descriptions of Brahmā, just as the identity of brahman is confirmed the context. Netaro ’nupapatter: the supreme brahman is not a jīva by the context of the discussion in Upaniṣads. Only because of the powers conferred by the supreme Lord on Brahmā situated in rajas, he is considered an avatāra.

bhāsvān yathāśma-śakaleṣu nijeṣu tejaḥ svīyam kiyat prakaṭayaty api tadvad atra | brahmā ya eṣa jagad-aṇḍa-vidhāna-kartā govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi ||

I worship the supreme lord Govinda who becomes Brahmā, the creator of the universe (by bestowing his powers to that jīva), just as the sun displays a small portion of its powers of heat and light in all the sun stones which represent it. Brahma-saṁhitā 5.49

Because Śiva is not a jīva, he is considered to be the Supreme Lord associated with the guṇas. Thus it is said:

kṣīraṁ yathā dadhi vikāra-viśeṣa-yogāt saṣjāyate na hi tataḥ pṛthag asti hetoḥ | yaḥ śambhutām api tathā samupaiti kāryād govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi ||

I worship the supreme lord Govinda who becomes the form of Śiva who is said to be non-different from Govinda, but who is also different because of his contact with the transformations of prakṛti, just as milk becomes yogurt, which can be said to be non-different from its cause, but acts in a different manner. Brahma-saṁhitā 5.45

Some say that, of Brahmā and Śiva, Śiva is īśvara or the supreme lord. Others say that he is connected with the guṇas. They explain as follows. It should be understood that yoga means connection by proximity, by contact and by supervision. The puruṣa, connected with the guṇas only as the supervisor, is devoid of guṇas, being situated in his svarūpa. Brahmā and Śiva however are connected to rajas and tamas by contact, and therefore called sa-guṇa, endowed with the guṇas. [Note: Rūpa Gosvāmī explains in Laghu-bhāgavatamṛta that Śiva appears to be covered by tamas, but actually is not. ] Being related to sattva-guṇa only by proximity, the puruṣa in the form of Kśīrodakaśāyī-viṣṇu is devoid of guṇas, being situated in his svarūpa. Thus it is said:

yogo niyāmakatayā guṇaiḥ sambandha ucyate | ataḥ sa tair na yujyate tatra svāṁśaḥ parasya yaḥ ||

The relationship of the puruṣa with the guṇas is that of being their controller. Among the three, he who is the svāṁśa of svayaṁ-rūpa Kṛṣṇa, is not bound by the guṇas. Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta 1.2.18

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.24

↗
పార్థివాద్దారుణో ధూమస్తస్మాదగ్నిస్త్రయీమయ: । తమసస్తు రజస్తస్మాత్సత్త్వం యద్బ్రహ్మదర్శనమ్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
pārthivād dāruṇo dhūmas
[paarthivaad daaruno dhoomas]
tasmād agnis trayīmayaḥ
[tasmaad agnis trayeemayah]
tamasas tu rajas tasmāt
[tamasas tu rajas tasmaat]
sattvaṁ yad brahma-darśanam
[sattvam yad brahma-darshanam]
pārthivāt — from earth dāruṇaḥ — firewood dhūmaḥ — smoke tasmāt — from that agniḥ — fire trayī — Vedic sacrifices mayaḥ — made of tamasaḥ — in the mode of ignorance tu — but rajaḥ — the mode of passion tasmāt — from that sattvam — the mode of goodness yat — which brahma — the Absolute Truth darśanam — realization.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pārthivād dāruṇo dhūmas
pārthivāt
from earth
dāruṇaḥ
firewood
dhūmaḥ
smoke
tasmād agnis trayīmayaḥ
tasmāt
from that
agniḥ
fire
trayī
Vedic sacrifices
mayaḥ
made of
tamasas tu rajas tasmāt
tamasaḥ
in the mode of ignorance
tu
but
rajaḥ
the mode of passion
tasmāt
from that
sattvaṁ yad brahma-darśanam
sattvam
the mode of goodness
yat
which
brahma
the Absolute Truth
darśanam
realization.
Firewood is a transformation of earth, but smoke is better than the raw wood. And fire is still better, for by fire we can derive the benefits of superior knowledge [through Vedic sacrifices]. Similarly, passion [rajas] is better than ignorance [tamas], but goodness [sattva] is best because by goodness one can come to realize the Absolute Truth.

As explained above, one can get release from the conditioned life of material existence by devotional service to the Personality of Godhead. It is further comprehended herein that one has to rise to the platform of the mode of goodness ( sattva ) so that one can be eligible for the devotional service of the Lord. But if there are impediments on the progressive path, anyone, even from the platform of tamas, can gradually rise to the sattva platform by the expert direction of the spiritual master. Sincere candidates must, therefore, approach an expert spiritual master for such a progressive march, and the bona fide, expert spiritual master is competent to direct a disciple from any stage of life: tamas, rajas or sattva.

It is a mistake, therefore, to consider that worship of any quality or any form of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is equally beneficial. Except Viṣṇu, all separated forms are manifested under the conditions of material energy, and therefore the forms of material energy cannot help anyone to rise to the platform of sattva, which alone can liberate a person from material bondage.

The uncivilized state of life, or the life of the lower animals, is controlled by the mode of tamas. The civilized life of man, with a passion for various types of material benefits, is the stage of rajas. The rajas stage of life gives a slight clue to the realization of the Absolute Truth in the forms of fine sentiments in philosophy, art and culture with moral and ethical principles, but the mode of sattva is a still higher stage of material quality, which actually helps one in realizing the Absolute Truth. In other words, there is a qualitative difference between the different kinds of worshiping methods as well as the respective results derived from the predominating deities, namely Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Hara.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Smoke is superior to dull wood, and fire, sacred to the Vedas, is superior to smoke. Similarly rajas is superior to tamas, and sattva is superior to rajas, since it is favorable for realizing the Lord.
Commentary

Tamas, rajas and sattva have the respective qualities of obscuring, agitating and revealing knowledge. Of these sattva is the best because it is not unfavorable for śuddha-sattva. This is shown through an example. Superior to wood — which is devoid of the quality of action and unable to reveal its nature (being unconscious) — is smoke. Smoke has an active nature. Superior to smoke however is fire, which has the qualities of action and revelation. It is called trayīmayaḥ (related to the Vedas) because it is used in rituals mentioned in the Vedas. Rajas, which is agitating, is superior to tamas which is inert. Sattva, being devoid of inertia and agitation, is superior since it gives a vision of brahman.

sattvāt saṣjāyate jṣānaṁ rajaso lobha eva ca pramāda-mohau tamaso bhavato ’jṣānam eva ca

Knowledge arises from sattva. Greed arises from rajas. Inattention, confusion and ignorance arise from tamas. BG 14.17

It is not obstructive to śuddha-sattva and does not cover it. It does not interfere with seeing brahman. It is thus an assistant in spiritual life. Without bhakti however, seeing the Lord (or even impersonal brahman) is impossible. This is confirmed later in the Bhāgavatam.

It is said of the Lord’s form ānando brahmaṇo rūpam: the supreme lord has a form of bliss. The guṇas of māyā - tamas, rajas and sattva - cannot act independently of him. Māyā paraity abhimukhe ca vilajjamānā: māyā flees from the Lord, being ashamed. (SB 2.7.47) Thus it is by the will of the lord, by his touch alone, that ānanda becomes qualified by agitation in the form of Brahmā. Being qualified by revelation, ānanda becomes Viṣṇu and being qualified with obscuration, ānanda becomes Śiva. Since there is no damage when ānanda is combined with revelation (sattva), Viṣṇu is worthy of worship.

Because one can realize fire through wood but not through smoke, tamas should be considered superior to rajas. In deep sleep (tamas) one has realization of oneness with ātmā. Thus some persons argue that between Brahmā and Śiva, Śiva is better.

These three are equal in that they are all avatāras of the Lord. They are unequal in that Viṣṇu is not covered by the guṇas, whereas Brahmā and Śiva are. This is how the contrary statements of difference and non-difference of the Purāṇas can be harmonized.

The śruti says asaṅgo hy ayaṁ puruṣaḥ: the ātmā is not contaminated by the guṇas. (Bṛhad Āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 4.3.15) Though both Paramātmā and jīvātmā are by their constitution devoid of the guṇas, because Paramātmā is the supreme lord, an ocean of cit, because he is independent in his actions, he remains ātmārāma, self enjoying, not subject to birth in the world, without diminution of his knowledge of himself, even though, by his will, he contacts the guṇas and thus is in possession the effects of the guṇas such as anger. However the jīva, because he is only a particle of cit, having very little ability of knowledge and because he is controlled by the Lord and not independent, and has very little power, he loses his knowledge of his real nature and takes birth in this world by contacting the guṇas where the guṇas act upon him.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.25

↗
భేజిరే మునయోఽథాగ్రే భగవన్తమధోక్షజమ్ । సత్త్వం విశుద్ధం క్షేమాయ కల్పన్తే యేఽను తానిహ ॥ ౨౫ ॥
bhejire munayo ’thāgre
[bhejire munayo ’thaagre]
bhagavantam adhokṣajam
[bhagavantam adhokshajam]
sattvaṁ viśuddhaṁ kṣemāya
[sattvam vishuddham kshemaaya]
kalpante ye ’nu tān iha
[kalpante ye ’nu taan iha]
bhejire — rendered service unto munayaḥ — the sages atha — thus agre — previously bhagavantam — unto the Personality of Godhead adhokṣajam — the Transcendence sattvam — existence viśuddham — above the three modes of nature kṣemāya — to derive the ultimate benefit kalpante — deserve ye — those anu — follow tān — those iha — in this material world.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhejire munayo ’thāgre
bhejire
rendered service unto
munayaḥ
the sages
bhagavantam adhokṣajam
sattvaṁ viśuddhaṁ kṣemāya
atha
thus
agre
previously
bhagavantam
unto the Personality of Godhead
adhokṣajam
the Transcendence
sattvam
existence
viśuddham
above the three modes of nature
kṣemāya
to derive the ultimate benefit
kalpante ye ’nu tān iha
kalpante
deserve
ye
those
anu
follow
tān
those
iha
in this material world.
Previously all the great sages rendered service unto the Personality of Godhead due to His existence above the three modes of material nature. They worshiped Him to become free from material conditions and thus derive the ultimate benefit. Whoever follows such great authorities is also eligible for liberation from the material world.

The purpose of performing religion is neither to profit by material gain nor to get the simple knowledge of discerning matter from spirit. The ultimate aim of religious performances is to release oneself from material bondage and regain the life of freedom in the transcendental world, where the Personality of Godhead is the Supreme Person. Laws of religion, therefore, are directly enacted by the Personality of Godhead, and except for the mahājanas, or the authorized agents of the Lord, no one knows the purpose of religion. There are twelve particular agents of the Lord who know the purpose of religion, and all of them render transcendental service unto Him. Persons who desire their own good may follow these mahājanas and thus attain the supreme benefit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore the ancient sages worshipped Supreme Lord, beyond the material senses, composed of viśuddha-sattva. Those who follow the sages attain liberation in this world.
Commentary

Thus (ataḥ), the sages in ancient times worshipped the Supreme Lord, who is viśuddha-sattva. Viśuddha-sattva means having a body composed of the cit-śakti arising from his svarūpa (not material sattva), because the śruti says vidyāvidyābhyāṁ bhinnam: the Lord is neither material knowledge (sattva) nor ignorance. (Gopāla-tāpanī Upaniṣad 2.20) Furthermore the smṛti says chāyātapau yatra na gṛdhra-pakṣau: in the Lord there is no ignorance or knowledge which causes prejudice towards the jīva. (SB 8.5.27) satya-jṣānānantānanda-mātraika-rasa-mūrtayaḥ: the viṣṇu-mūrtis all had eternal, unlimited forms, full of knowledge and bliss and existing beyond the influence of time. (SB 10.13.54) Because the body of Viṣṇu is beyond māyā, one cannot say that viśuddha-sattva means the vidyā arising from māyā-śakti. The persons who follow after (anu) these sages are qualified for liberation (kṣemāya) in this world (iha).

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.26

↗
ముముక్షవో ఘోరరూపాన్ హిత్వా భూతపతీనథ । నారాయణకలా: శాన్తా భజన్తి హ్యనసూయవ: ॥ ౨౬ ॥
mumukṣavo ghora-rūpān
[mumukshavo ghora-roopaan]
hitvā bhūta-patīn atha
[hitvaa bhoota-pateen atha]
nārāyaṇa-kalāḥ śāntā
[naaraayana-kalaah shaantaa]
bhajanti hy anasūyavaḥ
[bhajanti hy anasooyavah]
mumukṣavaḥ — persons desiring liberation ghora — horrible, ghastly rūpān — forms like that hitvā — rejecting bhūta-patīn — demigods atha — for this reason nārāyaṇa — the Personality of Godhead kalāḥ — plenary portions śāntāḥ — all-blissful bhajanti — do worship hi — certainly anasūyavaḥ — nonenvious.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mumukṣavo ghora-rūpān
mumukṣavaḥ
persons desiring liberation
ghora
horrible, ghastly
rūpān
forms like that
hitvā bhūta-patīn atha
hitvā
rejecting
bhūta-patīn
demigods
atha
for this reason
nārāyaṇa
the Personality of Godhead
nārāyaṇa-kalāḥ śāntā
kalāḥ
plenary portions
śāntāḥ
all-blissful
bhajanti hy anasūyavaḥ
bhajanti
do worship
hi
certainly
anasūyavaḥ
nonenvious.
Those who are serious about liberation are certainly nonenvious, and they respect all. Yet they reject the horrible and ghastly forms of the demigods and worship only the all-blissful forms of Lord Viṣṇu and His plenary portions.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is the original person of the Viṣṇu categories, expands Himself in two different categories, namely integrated plenary portions and separated parts and parcels. The separated parts and parcels are the servitors, and the integrated plenary portions of viṣṇu-tattvas are the worshipful objects of service.

All demigods who are empowered by the Supreme Lord are also separated parts and parcels. They do not belong to the categories of viṣṇu-tattva. The viṣṇu-tattvas are living beings equally as powerful as the original form of the Personality of Godhead, and They display different categories of power in consideration of different times and circumstances. The separated parts and parcels are powerful by limitation. They do not have unlimited power like the viṣṇu-tattvas. Therefore, one should never classify the viṣṇu-tattvas, or the plenary portions of Nārāyaṇa, the Personality of Godhead, in the same categories with the parts and parcels. If anyone does so he becomes at once an offender by the name pāṣaṇḍī. In the Age of Kali many foolish persons commit such unlawful offenses and equalize the two categories.

The separated parts and parcels have different positions in the estimation of material powers, and some of them are like Kāla-bhairava, Śmaśāna-bhairava, Śani, Mahākālī and Caṇḍikā. These demigods are worshiped mostly by those who are in the lowest categories of the mode of darkness or ignorance. Other demigods, like Brahmā, Śiva, Sūrya, Gaṇeśa and many similar deities, are worshiped by men in the mode of passion, urged on by the desire for material enjoyment. But those who are actually situated in the mode of goodness ( sattva-guṇa ) of material nature worship only viṣṇu-tattvas. Viṣṇu-tattvas are represented by various names and forms, such as Nārāyaṇa, Dāmodara, Vāmana, Govinda and Adhokṣaja.

The qualified brāhmaṇas worship the viṣṇu-tattvas represented by the śālagrāma-śilā, and some of the higher castes like the kṣatriyas and vaiśyas also generally worship the viṣṇu-tattvas.

Highly qualified brāhmaṇas situated in the mode of goodness have no grudges against the mode of worship of others. They have all respect for other demigods, even though they may look ghastly, like Kāla-bhairava or Mahākālī. They know very well that these horrible features of the Supreme Lord are all different servitors of the Lord under different conditions, yet they reject the worship of both horrible and attractive features of the demigods, and they concentrate only on the forms of Viṣṇu because they are serious about liberation from the material conditions. The demigods, even to the stage of Brahmā, the supreme of all the demigods, cannot offer liberation to anyone. Hiraṇyakaśipu underwent a severe type of penance to become eternal in life, but his worshipful deity, Brahmā, could not satisfy him with such blessings. Therefore Viṣṇu, and none else, is called mukti-pāda, or the Personality of Godhead who can bestow upon us mukti, liberation. The demigods, being like other living entities in the material world, are all liquidated at the time of the annihilation of the material structure. They are themselves unable to get liberation, and what to speak of giving liberation to their devotees. The demigods can award the worshipers some temporary benefit only, and not the ultimate one.

It is for this reason only that candidates for liberation deliberately reject the worship of the demigods, although they have no disrespect for any one of them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rejecting the frightful forms Śiva or others devatās, persons desirous of liberation (what to speak of the devotees), without criticizing those devatās, worship the avatāras of Nārāyaṇa.
Commentary

Bhūta-patīn as well as meaning forms of Śiva, also indicates Pitṛs, Brahmā and others. Anasūyavaḥ means they do not criticize those devatās.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.27

↗
రజస్తమ:ప్రకృతయ: సమశీలా భజన్తి వై । పితృభూతప్రజేశాదీన్శ్రియైశ్వర్యప్రజేప్సవ: ॥ ౨౭ ॥
rajas-tamaḥ-prakṛtayaḥ
[rajas-tamah-prakritayah]
sama-śīlā bhajanti vai
[sama-sheelaa bhajanti vai]
pitṛ-bhūta-prajeśādīn
[pitri-bhoota-prajeshaadeen]
śriyaiśvarya-prajepsavaḥ
[shriyaishvarya-prajepsavah]
rajaḥ — the mode of passion tamaḥ — the mode of ignorance prakṛtayaḥ — of that mentality sama-śīlāḥ — of the same categories bhajanti — do worship vai — actually pitṛ — the forefathers bhūta — other living beings prajeśa-ādīn — controllers of cosmic administration śriyā — enrichment aiśvarya — wealth and power prajā — progeny īpsavaḥ — so desiring.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rajas-tamaḥ-prakṛtayaḥ
rajaḥ
the mode of passion
tamaḥ
the mode of ignorance
prakṛtayaḥ
of that mentality
sama-śīlā bhajanti vai
sama-śīlāḥ
of the same categories
bhajanti
do worship
vai
actually
pitṛ-bhūta-prajeśādīn
pitṛ
the forefathers
bhūta
other living beings
prajeśa-ādīn
controllers of cosmic administration
śriyaiśvarya-prajepsavaḥ
śriyā
enrichment
aiśvarya
wealth and power
prajā
progeny
īpsavaḥ
so desiring.
Those who are in the modes of passion and ignorance worship those in the same category — namely the forefathers, other living beings and the demigods who are in charge of cosmic activities — for they are urged by a desire to be materially benefited with women, wealth, power and progeny.

There is no need to worship demigods of whatsoever category if one is serious about going back to Godhead. In the Bhagavad-gītā (7.20, 23) it is clearly said that those who are mad after material enjoyment approach the different demigods for temporary benefits, which are meant for men with a poor fund of knowledge. We should never desire to increase the depth of material enjoyment. Material enjoyment should be accepted only up to the point of the bare necessities of life and not more or less than that. To accept more material enjoyment means to bind oneself more and more to the miseries of material existence. More wealth, more women and false aristocracy are some of the demands of the materially disposed man because he has no information of the benefit derived from Viṣṇu worship. By Viṣṇu worship one can derive benefit in this life as well as in life after death. Forgetting these principles, foolish people who are after more wealth, more wives and more children worship various demigods. The aim of life is to end the miseries of life and not to increase them.

For material enjoyment there is no need to approach the demigods. The demigods are but servants of the Lord. As such, they are duty-bound to supply necessities of life in the form of water, light, air, etc. One should work hard and worship the Supreme Lord by the fruits of one’s hard labor for existence, and that should be the motto of life. One should be careful to execute occupational service with faith in God in the proper way, and that will lead one gradually on the progressive march back to Godhead.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, when He was personally present at Vrajadhāma, stopped the worship of the demigod Indra and advised the residents of Vraja to worship by their business and to have faith in God. Worshiping the multidemigods for material gain is practically a perversity of religion. This sort of religious activity has been condemned in the very beginning of the Bhāgavatam as kaitava-dharma. There is only one religion in the world to be followed by one and all, and that is the Bhāgavata-dharma, or the religion which teaches one to worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead and no one else.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Desirers of progeny and power along with wealth, having natures of rajas and tamas, corresponding to the natures their deities, worship the Pitṛs, Śiva, Brahmā and others.
Commentary

Prakṛtayaḥ means (having the nature of). These natures are similar to those of the Pitṛs, Śiva and other devatās. Śriyā, in the instrumental case, means “along with wealth.”

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.28-29

↗
వాసుదేవపరా వేదా వాసుదేవపరా మఖా: । వాసుదేవపరా యోగా వాసుదేవపరా: క్రియా: ॥ ౨౮ ॥ వాసుదేవపరం జ్ఞానం వాసుదేవపరం తప: । వాసుదేవపరో ధర్మో వాసుదేవపరా గతి: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
vāsudeva-parā vedā
[vaasudeva-paraa vedaa]
vāsudeva-parā makhāḥ
[vaasudeva-paraa makhaah]
vāsudeva-parā yogā
[vaasudeva-paraa yogaa]
vāsudeva-parāḥ kriyāḥ
[vaasudeva-paraah kriyaah]
vāsudeva-paraṁ jṣānaṁ
[vaasudeva-param jshaanam]
vāsudeva-paraṁ tapaḥ
[vaasudeva-param tapah]
vāsudeva-paro dharmo
[vaasudeva-paro dharmo]
vāsudeva-parā gatiḥ
[vaasudeva-paraa gatih]
vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — the ultimate goal vedāḥ — revealed scriptures vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — for worshiping makhāḥ — sacrifices vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — the means of attaining yogāḥ — mystic paraphernalia vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — under His control kriyāḥ — fruitive activities vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead param — the supreme jṣānam — knowledge vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead param — best tapaḥ — austerity vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead paraḥ — superior quality dharmaḥ — religion vāsudeva — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — ultimate gatiḥ — goal of life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vāsudeva-parā vedā
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
the ultimate goal
vedāḥ
revealed scriptures
vāsudeva-parā makhāḥ
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
for worshiping
makhāḥ
sacrifices
vāsudeva-parā yogā
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
the means of attaining
yogāḥ
mystic paraphernalia
vāsudeva-parāḥ kriyāḥ
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
under His control
kriyāḥ
fruitive activities
vāsudeva-paraṁ jṣānaṁ
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
param
the supreme
jṣānam
knowledge
vāsudeva-paraṁ tapaḥ
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
param
best
tapaḥ
austerity
vāsudeva-paro dharmo
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
paraḥ
superior quality
dharmaḥ
religion
vāsudeva-parā gatiḥ
vāsudeva
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
ultimate
gatiḥ
goal of life.
In the revealed scriptures, the ultimate object of knowledge is Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead. The purpose of performing sacrifice is to please Him. Yoga is for realizing Him. All fruitive activities are ultimately rewarded by Him only. He is supreme knowledge, and all severe austerities are performed to know Him. Religion [dharma] is rendering loving service unto Him. He is the supreme goal of life.

That Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, is the only object of worship is confirmed in these two ślokas. In the Vedic literature there is the same objective: establishing one’s relationship and ultimately reviving our lost loving service unto Him. That is the sum and substance of the Vedas. In the Bhagavad-gītā the same theory is confirmed by the Lord in His own words: the ultimate purpose of the Vedas is to know Him only. All the revealed scriptures are prepared by the Lord through His incarnation in the body of Śrīla Vyāsadeva just to remind the fallen souls, conditioned by material nature, of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead. No demigod can award freedom from material bondage. That is the verdict of all the Vedic literatures. Impersonalists who have no information of the Personality of Godhead minimize the omnipotency of the Supreme Lord and put Him on equal footing with all other living beings, and for this act such impersonalists get freedom from material bondage only with great difficulty. They can surrender unto Him only after many, many births in the culture of transcendental knowledge.

One may argue that the Vedic activities are based on sacrificial ceremonies. That is true. But all such sacrifices are also meant for realizing the truth about Vāsudeva. Another name of Vāsudeva is Yajṣa (sacrifice), and in the Bhagavad-gītā it is clearly stated that all sacrifices and all activities are to be conducted for the satisfaction of Yajṣa, or Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead. This is the case also with the yoga systems. Yoga means to get into touch with the Supreme Lord. The process, however, includes several bodily features such as āsana, dhyāna, prāṇāyāma and meditation, and all of them are meant for concentrating upon the localized aspect of Vāsudeva represented as Paramātmā. Paramātmā realization is but partial realization of Vāsudeva, and if one is successful in that attempt, one realizes Vāsudeva in full. But by ill luck most yogīs are stranded by the powers of mysticism achieved through the bodily process. Ill-fated yogīs are given a chance in the next birth by being placed in the families of good learned brāhmaṇas or in the families of rich merchants in order to execute the unfinished task of Vāsudeva realization. If such fortunate brāhmaṇas and sons of rich men properly utilize the chance, they can easily realize Vāsudeva by good association with saintly persons. Unfortunately, such preferred persons are captivated again by material wealth and honor, and thus they practically forget the aim of life.

This is also so for the culture of knowledge. According to Bhagavad-gītā there are eighteen items in culturing knowledge. By such culture of knowledge one becomes gradually prideless, devoid of vanity, nonviolent, forbearing, simple, devoted to the great spiritual master, and self-controlled. By culture of knowledge one becomes unattached to hearth and home and becomes conscious of the miseries due to death, birth, old age and disease. And all culture of knowledge culminates in devotional service to the Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva. Therefore, Vāsudeva is the ultimate aim in culturing all different branches of knowledge. Culture of knowledge leading one to the transcendental plane of meeting Vāsudeva is real knowledge. Physical knowledge in its various branches is condemned in the Bhagavad-gītā as ajṣāna, or the opposite of real knowledge. The ultimate aim of physical knowledge is to satisfy the senses, which means prolongation of the term of material existence and thereby continuance of the threefold miseries. So prolonging the miserable life of material existence is nescience. But the same physical knowledge leading to the way of spiritual understanding helps one to end the miserable life of physical existence and to begin the life of spiritual existence on the plane of Vāsudeva.

The same applies to all kinds of austerities. Tapasya means voluntary acceptance of bodily pains to achieve some higher end of life. Rāvaṇa and Hiraṇyakaśipu underwent a severe type of bodily torture to achieve the end of sense gratification. Sometimes modern politicians also undergo severe types of austerities to achieve some political end. This is not actually tapasya. One should accept voluntary bodily inconvenience for the sake of knowing Vāsudeva because that is the way of real austerities. Otherwise all forms of austerities are classified as modes of passion and ignorance. Passion and ignorance cannot end the miseries of life. Only the mode of goodness can mitigate the threefold miseries of life. Vasudeva and Devakī, the so-called father and mother of Lord Kṛṣṇa, underwent penances to get Vāsudeva as their son. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the father of all living beings ( Bg. 14.4 ). Therefore He is the original living being of all other living beings. He is the original eternal enjoyer amongst all other enjoyers. Therefore no one can be His begetting father, as the ignorant may think. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa agreed to become the son of Vasudeva and Devakī upon being pleased with their severe austerities. Therefore if any austerities have to be done, they must be done to achieve the end of knowledge, Vāsudeva.

Vāsudeva is the original Personality of Godhead, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. As explained before, the original Personality of Godhead expands Himself by innumerable forms. Such expansion of forms is made possible by His various energies. His energies are also multifarious, and His internal energies are superior and external energies inferior in quality. They are explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.4-6) as the parā and the aparā prakṛtis. So His expansions of various forms which take place via the internal energies are superior forms, whereas the expansions which take place via the external energies are inferior forms. The living entities are also His expansions. The living entities who are expanded by His internal potency are eternally liberated persons, whereas those who are expanded in terms of the material energies are eternally conditioned souls. Therefore, all culture of knowledge, austerities, sacrifice and activities should be aimed at changing the quality of the influence that is acting upon us. For the present, we are all being controlled by the external energy of the Lord, and just to change the quality of the influence, we must endeavor to cultivate spiritual energy. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that those who are mahātmās, or those whose minds have been so broadened as to be engaged in the service of Lord Kṛṣṇa, are under the influence of the internal potency, and the effect is that such broadminded living beings are constantly engaged in the service of the Lord without deviation. That should be the aim of life. And that is the verdict of all the Vedic literatures. No one should bother himself with fruitive activities or dry speculation about transcendental knowledge. Everyone should at once engage himself in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. Nor should one worship different demigods who work as different hands of the Lord for creation, maintenance or destruction of the material world. There are innumerable powerful demigods who look over the external management of the material world. They are all different assisting hands of Lord Vāsudeva. Even Lord Śiva and Lord Brahmā are included in the list of demigods, but Lord Viṣṇu, or Vāsudeva, is always transcendentally situated. Even though He accepts the quality of goodness of the material world, He is still transcendental to all the material modes. The following example will clear that matter more explicitly. In the prison house there are the prisoners and the managers of the prison house. Both the managers and the prisoners are bound by the laws of the king. But even though the king sometimes comes in the prison, he is not bound by the laws of the prison house. The king is therefore always transcendental to the laws of the prison house, as the Lord is always transcendental to the laws of the material world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vāsudeva is the purport of the Vedas. Vāsudeva is the object of all sacrifices. Yoga, varṇāśrama, knowledge and austerities are all dependent on Vāsudeva. Bhakti is dependent on Vāsudeva. Prema and liberation are dependent on Vāsudeva.
Commentary

“But Pitṛs and devatās are said to worshippable by the Vedas. What is wrong with them?”

The Vedas have as their purport Vāsudeva.

ālena naṣṭā pralaye vāṇīyaṁ veda-saṁjṣitā mayādau brahmaṇe proktā dharmo yasyāṁ mad-ātmakaḥ

By the influence of time, the Vedic knowledge was lost at the time of annihilation. Therefore, when the subsequent creation took place, I spoke to Brahmā the Vedic knowledge in which bhakti is the essence. SB 11.14.3 kiṁ vidhatte kim ācaṣṭe kim anūdya vikalpayet ity asyā hṛdayaṁ loke nānyo mad veda kaścana

What do the Vedas instruct as action? What is the final meaning of the Vedas? What alternatives do the Vedas raise? No one except me or my dear devotee knows the intended meaning of the Vedas. SB 11.21.42

māṁ vidhatte ’bhidhatte māṁ vikalpyāpohyate tv aham etāvān sarva-vedārthaḥ śabda āsthāya māṁ bhidām māyā-mātram anūdyānte pratiṣidhya prasīdati

The Vedas indicate bhakti as the action, and indicate me as the meaning. I am the meaning of all the Vedas. I, as karma and jṣāna, am proposed and rejected as alternatives. The Vedas, taking shelter of me, proposing karma and jṣāna and then rejecting them as māyā, become happy by giving the devotees bliss. SB 11.21.43

Thus these people, not knowing the purport of the Vedas, worship the Pitṛs and others.

“But it is clearly seen that the Vedas are concerned with sacrifice and yoga.” That is true.

svaṁ lokaṁ na vidus te vai yatra devo janārdanaḥ āhur dhūmra-dhiyo vedaṁ sakarmakam atad-vidaḥ

Those who are less intelligent accept the Vedic ritualistic ceremonies as all in all. They do not know that the purpose of the Vedas is to understand one’s own home, where the Supreme Personality of Godhead lives. Not being interested in their real home, they are illusioned and search after other homes. SB 4.29.48

Thus according to the words of Nārada, sacrifice and yoga are not meaning of the Vedas. The Lord himself says dharmo yasyāṁ mad-ātmakaḥ: I Myself am the religious principles enunciated in the Vedas. (SB 11.14.3) Devahūti says

aho bata śva-paco ’to garīyān yaj-jihvāgre vartate nāma tubhyam tepus tapas te juhuvuḥ sasnur āryā brahmānūcur nāma gṛṇanti ye te

How astonishing! The outcaste on the tip of whose tongue is your name is the guru! All those who chant your name, most respectable, have completed all austerities, all sacrifices, all bathing and all study of the Vedas. SB 3.33.7

Nārada, in saying yathā taror mūla-niṣecanena (SB 4.31.14), has indicated that Vāsudeva is the conclusion of the Vedas. Thus it is clear that the meaning of all the Vedas is simply devotion to Bhagavān alone.

Or, all sacrifices are dedicated to Vāsudeva can mean that the sacrifices worship Indra and others as the limbs of Vāsudeva. This is well known in the story of Bharata. [Note: Mahārāja Bharata expertly understood how the offering made to different demigods was simply an offering to the different limbs of the Lord. For instance, Indra is the arm of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and Sūrya [the sun] is His eye. Thus Mahārāja Bharata considered that the oblations offered to different demigods were actually offered unto the different limbs of Lord Vāsudeva. (SB 5 7.6)] Yoga is dedicated to meditation of the Lord. This is well known from the story of Kapila. All karmas are dependent on the Lord since they cannot bestow results without including worship of the Lord. Jṣāna and tapas are also dependent on the Lord for results. Since karma-yoga has already been mentioned by the words vāsudeva-parā kriyaḥ, vāsudeva-paro dharmaḥ means parama-dharma, the actions of bhakti such as hearing and chanting. These are all dedicated to Vāsudeva. Paro dharma and the goal (gati), prema and liberation, are dependent on Vāsudeva alone for results.

Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.30

↗
స ఏవేదం ససర్జాగ్రే భగవానాత్మమాయయా । సదసద్రూపయా చాసౌ గుణమయాగుణో విభు: ॥ ౩౦ ॥
sa evedaṁ sasarjāgre
[sa evedam sasarjaagre]
bhagavān ātma-māyayā
[bhagavaan aatma-maayayaa]
sad-asad-rūpayā cāsau
[sad-asad-roopayaa chaasau]
guṇamayāguṇo vibhuḥ
[gunamayaaguno vibhuh]
saḥ — that eva — certainly idam — this sasarja — created agre — before bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead ātma-māyayā — by His personal potency sat — the cause asat — the effect rūpayā — by forms ca — and asau — the same Lord guṇa-maya — in the modes of material nature aguṇaḥ — transcendental vibhuḥ — the Absolute.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa evedaṁ sasarjāgre
saḥ
that
eva
certainly
idam
this
sasarja
created
agre
before
bhagavān ātma-māyayā
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
ātma-māyayā
by His personal potency
sad-asad-rūpayā cāsau
sat
the cause
asat
the effect
rūpayā
by forms
ca
and
asau
the same Lord
guṇamayāguṇo vibhuḥ
guṇa-maya
in the modes of material nature
aguṇaḥ
transcendental
vibhuḥ
the Absolute.
In the beginning of the material creation, that Absolute Personality of Godhead [Vāsudeva], in His transcendental position, created the energies of cause and effect by His own internal energy.

The position of the Lord is always transcendental because the causal and effectual energies required for the creation of the material world were also created by Him. He is unaffected, therefore, by the qualities of the material modes. His existence, form, activities and paraphernalia all existed before the material creation.* He is all-spiritual and has nothing to do with the qualities of the material world, which are qualitatively distinct from the spiritual qualities of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The powerful Lord alone, devoid of material guṇas, previously created this universe by his material energy composed of material guṇas and endowed with cause and effect.
Commentary

The creator of all those who are recommended for worship such as Pitṛs, Śiva and Brahmā is Vāsudeva alone. Thus he is worthy of worship. The Lord is without guṇas, but he creates the universe using matter composed of guṇas and material cause and effect (sad-asad-rūpayā).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.31

↗
తయా విలసితేష్వేషు గుణేషు గుణవానివ । అన్త:ప్రవిష్ట ఆభాతి విజ్ఞానేన విజృమ్భిత: ॥ ౩౧ ॥
tayā vilasiteṣv eṣu
[tayaa vilasiteshv eshu]
guṇeṣu guṇavān iva
[guneshu gunavaan iva]
antaḥ-praviṣṭa ābhāti
[antah-pravishta aabhaati]
vijṣānena vijṛmbhitaḥ
[vijshaanena vijrimbhitah]
tayā — by them vilasiteṣu — although in the function eṣu — these guṇeṣu — the modes of material nature guṇavān — affected by the modes iva — as if antaḥ — within praviṣṭaḥ — entered into ābhāti — appears to be vijṣānena — by transcendental consciousness vijṛmbhitaḥ — fully enlightened.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayā vilasiteṣv eṣu
tayā
by them
vilasiteṣu
although in the function
eṣu
these
guṇeṣu guṇavān iva
guṇeṣu
the modes of material nature
guṇavān
affected by the modes
iva
as if
antaḥ-praviṣṭa ābhāti
antaḥ
within
praviṣṭaḥ
entered into
ābhāti
appears to be
vijṣānena vijṛmbhitaḥ
vijṣānena
by transcendental consciousness
vijṛmbhitaḥ
fully enlightened.
After creating the material substance, the Lord [Vāsudeva] expands Himself and enters into it. And although He is within the material modes of nature and appears to be one of the created beings, He is always fully enlightened in His transcendental position.

The living entities are separated parts and parcels of the Lord, and the conditioned living entities, who are unfit for the spiritual kingdom, are strewn within the material world to enjoy matter to the fullest extent. As Paramātmā and eternal friend of the living entities, the Lord, by one of His plenary portions, accompanies the living entities to guide them in their material enjoyment and to become witness to all activities. While the living entities enjoy the material conditions, the Lord maintains His transcendental position without being affected by the material atmosphere. In the Vedic literatures ( śruti ) it is said that there are two birds in one tree. One of them is eating the fruit of the tree, while the other is witnessing the actions. The witness is the Lord, and the fruit-eater is the living entity. The fruit-eater (living entity) has forgotten his real identity and is overwhelmed in the fruitive activities of the material conditions, but the Lord (Paramātmā) is always full in transcendental knowledge. That is the difference between the Supersoul and the conditioned soul. The conditioned soul, the living entity, is controlled by the laws of nature, while the Paramātmā, or the Supersoul, is the controller of the material energy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord entered into the jīvas covered by the guṇas, manifested by material māyā. He appears to be in contact with the guṇas, but he is strengthened by his spiritual potency.
Commentary

The Lord is the inner soul of all that he created. This is explained in three verses. The Lord entered the jīvas covered with guṇas (guṇeṣu), made to manifest (vilasiteṣu) by māyā (tayā). The Lord appears to be associating with the guṇas (guṇavān). But this is not actually so, because he is excels in power by his cit-śakti (vijṣānena).

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.32

↗
యథా హ్యవహితో వహ్నిర్దారుష్వేక: స్వయోనిషు । నానేవ భాతి విశ్వాత్మా భూతేషు చ తథా పుమాన్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
yathā hy avahito vahnir
[yathaa hy avahito vahnir]
dāruṣv ekaḥ sva-yoniṣu
[daarushv ekah sva-yonishu]
nāneva bhāti viśvātmā
[naaneva bhaati vishvaatmaa]
bhūteṣu ca tathā pumān
[bhooteshu cha tathaa pumaan]
yathā — as much as hi — exactly like avahitaḥ — surcharged with vahniḥ — fire dāruṣu — in wood ekaḥ — one sva-yoniṣu — the source of manifestation nānā iva — like different entities bhāti — illuminates viśva-ātmā — the Lord as Paramātmā bhūteṣu — in the living entities ca — and tathā — in the same way pumān — the Absolute Person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā hy avahito vahnir
yathā
as much as
hi
exactly like
avahitaḥ
surcharged with
vahniḥ
fire
dāruṣv ekaḥ sva-yoniṣu
dāruṣu
in wood
ekaḥ
one
sva-yoniṣu
the source of manifestation
nāneva bhāti viśvātmā
nānā iva
like different entities
bhāti
illuminates
viśva-ātmā
the Lord as Paramātmā
bhūteṣu ca tathā pumān
bhūteṣu
in the living entities
ca
and
tathā
in the same way
pumān
the Absolute Person.
The Lord, as Supersoul, pervades all things, just as fire permeates wood, and so He appears to be of many varieties, though He is the absolute one without a second.

Lord Vāsudeva, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, by one of His plenary parts expands Himself all over the material world, and His existence can be perceived even within the atomic energy. Matter, antimatter, proton, neutron, etc., are all different effects of the Paramātmā feature of the Lord. As from wood, fire can be manifested, or as butter can be churned out of milk, so also the presence of the Lord as Paramātmā can be felt by the process of legitimate hearing and chanting of the transcendental subjects which are especially treated in the Vedic literatures like the Upaniṣads and Vedānta. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the bona fide explanation of these Vedic literatures. The Lord can be realized through the aural reception of the transcendental message, and that is the only way to experience the transcendental subject. As fire is kindled from wood by another fire, the divine consciousness of man can similarly be kindled by another divine grace. His Divine Grace the spiritual master can kindle the spiritual fire from the woodlike living entity by imparting proper spiritual messages injected through the receptive ear. Therefore one is required to approach the proper spiritual master with receptive ears only, and thus divine existence is gradually realized. The difference between animality and humanity lies in this process only. A human being can hear properly, whereas an animal cannot.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as one fire, situated in pieces of wood as its natural place of manifestation, blazes forth as many fires, the one Supreme Lord, the soul of the universe, Paramātmā, situated in all living beings, manifests as many.
Commentary

Just as fire is always situated (avahitaḥ) in pieces of wood, so the soul of the universe, antaryāmī Viṣṇu, is situated in all living entities (bhūteṣu). If fire is made to appear in pieces of wood by friction, it burns up those pieces of wood. Similarly by practices of hearing and chanting Paramātmā is made to appear and removes the covering of māyā on the jīva. This is indicated by the example.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.33

↗
అసౌ గుణమయైర్భావైర్భూతసూక్ష్మేన్ద్రియాత్మభి: । స్వనిర్మితేషు నిర్విష్టో భుఙ్క్తే భూతేషు తద్గుణాన్ ॥ ౩౩ ॥
asau guṇamayair bhāvair
[asau gunamayair bhaavair]
bhūta-sūkṣmendriyātmabhiḥ
[bhoota-sookshmendriyaatmabhih]
sva-nirmiteṣu nirviṣṭo
[sva-nirmiteshu nirvishto]
bhuṅkte bhūteṣu tad-guṇān
[bhunkte bhooteshu tad-gunaan]
asau — that Paramātmā guṇa-mayaiḥ — influenced by the modes of nature bhāvaiḥ — naturally bhūta — created sūkṣma — subtle indriya — senses ātmabhiḥ — by the living beings sva-nirmiteṣu — in His own creation nirviṣṭaḥ — entering bhuṅkte — causes to enjoy bhūteṣu — in the living entities tat-guṇān — those modes of nature.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
asau guṇamayair bhāvair
asau
that Paramātmā
guṇa-mayaiḥ
influenced by the modes of nature
bhāvaiḥ
naturally
bhūta-sūkṣmendriyātmabhiḥ
bhūta
created
sūkṣma
subtle
indriya
senses
ātmabhiḥ
by the living beings
sva-nirmiteṣu nirviṣṭo
sva-nirmiteṣu
in His own creation
nirviṣṭaḥ
entering
bhuṅkte bhūteṣu tad-guṇān
bhuṅkte
causes to enjoy
bhūteṣu
in the living entities
tat-guṇān
those modes of nature.
The Supersoul enters into the bodies of the created beings who are influenced by the modes of material nature and causes them to enjoy the effects of these modes by the subtle mind.

There are 8,400,000 species of living beings beginning from the highest intellectual being, Brahmā, down to the insignificant ant, and all of them are enjoying the material world according to the desires of the subtle mind and gross material body. The gross material body is based on the conditions of the subtle mind, and the senses are created according to the desire of the living being. The Lord as Paramātmā helps the living being to get material happiness because the living being is helpless in all respects in obtaining what he desires. He proposes, and the Lord disposes. In another sense, the living beings are parts and parcels of the Lord. They are therefore one with the Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā the living beings in all varieties of bodies have been claimed by the Lord as His sons. The sufferings and enjoyments of the sons are indirectly the sufferings and enjoyments of the father. Still the father is not in any way affected directly by the suffering and enjoyment of the sons. He is so kind that He constantly remains with the living being as Paramātmā and always tries to convert the living being towards the real happiness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord as Paramātmā, having entered all the bodies with material sense objects, senses and mind, which have been created by the Lord, makes the jīvas enjoy the sense objects colored by the guṇas.
Commentary

That soul of the universe, Paramātmā, with conditions made of the guṇas in the form of sense objects (bhūta-sukṣma), senses and mind (ātmā), having entered into the bodies of living entities such as devatās and animals created by himself, enjoys those sense objects which correspond to the guṇas (tad-gunān). The Lord does not enjoy happiness of material sense objects. Thus the sentence means that, without the Paramātmā, the jīvas cannot act as enjoyers. Or it means that the Paramātmā enjoys through the jīva, because the jīva is the taṭastha-śakti of the Lord. Or the verb enjoys may be taken in a causal sense. Thus it means that the Paramātmā lets the jīvas enjoy the sense objects.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.2.34

↗
భావయత్యేష సత్త్వేన లోకాన్ వై లోకభావన: । లీలావతారానురతో దేవతిర్యఙ్‍నరాదిషు ॥ ౩౪ ॥
bhāvayaty eṣa sattvena
[bhaavayaty esha sattvena]
lokān vai loka-bhāvanaḥ
[lokaan vai loka-bhaavanah]
līlāvatārānurato
[leelaavataaraanurato]
deva-tiryaṅ-narādiṣu
[deva-tiryan-naraadishu]
bhāvayati — maintains eṣaḥ — all these sattvena — in the mode of goodness lokān — all over the universe vai — generally loka-bhāvanaḥ — the master of all the universes līlā — pastimes avatāra — incarnation anurataḥ — assuming the role deva — the demigods tiryak — lower animals nara-ādiṣu — in the midst of human beings.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhāvayaty eṣa sattvena
bhāvayati
maintains
eṣaḥ
all these
sattvena
in the mode of goodness
lokān vai loka-bhāvanaḥ
lokān
all over the universe
vai
generally
loka-bhāvanaḥ
the master of all the universes
līlāvatārānurato
līlā
pastimes
avatāra
incarnation
anurataḥ
assuming the role
deva-tiryaṅ-narādiṣu
deva
the demigods
tiryak
lower animals
nara-ādiṣu
in the midst of human beings.
Thus the Lord of the universes maintains all planets inhabited by demigods, men and lower animals. Assuming the roles of incarnations, He performs pastimes to reclaim those in the mode of pure goodness.

There are innumerable material universes, and in each and every universe there are innumerable planets inhabited by different grades of living entities in different modes of nature. The Lord (Viṣṇu) incarnates Himself in each and every one of them and in each and every type of living society. He manifests His transcendental pastimes amongst them just to create the desire to go back to Godhead. The Lord does not change His original transcendental position, but He appears to be differently manifested according to the particular time, circumstances and society.

Sometimes He incarnates Himself or empowers a suitable living being to act for Him, but in either case the purpose is the same: the Lord wants the suffering living beings to go back home, back to Godhead. The happiness which the living beings are hankering for is not to be found within any corner of the innumerable universes and material planets. The eternal happiness which the living being wants is obtainable in the kingdom of God, but the forgetful living beings under the influence of the material modes have no information of the kingdom of God. The Lord, therefore, comes to propagate the message of the kingdom of God, either personally as an incarnation or through His bona fide representative as the good son of God. Such incarnations or sons of God are not making propaganda for going back to Godhead only within the human society. Their work is also going on in all types of societies, amongst demigods and those other than human beings.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Second Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Divinity and Divine Service.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, creator of the universe, absorbing himself in the forms of various līlāvatāras as devatās, animals and humans, protects the worlds through his role as the controller of sattva-guṇa.
Commentary

It has been described that the Lord appears as many forms when he enters all the living beings. However the lord is without limitation or material contamination in all his forms. He appears in many forms with his svarūpa in his eternal pastimes. Bhāvayati means “he protects.” Or it means “he bestows them with prema (bhāva).” This verse describes the normal goal of all avatāras. [Note: Śrīdhara Ṣvāmī says this verse answers the question about the purpose of the avatāras. ] Loka-bhāvanaḥ here means “creator of the universe” instead of “protector of the worlds,” to avoid redundant meaning, since bhāvayati lokan already means “he protects the worlds.”

Chapter Three List of the Avatāras

📝 My note