FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

3.31 · Lord Kapila's Instructions on the Movements of the Living Entities

47 verses
S Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (14925 chars)

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Lord Kapiladeva instructed His mother, Devahuti, in the science of sankhya-yoga. This is an ancient philosophical system which analyses the elemental make-up of the physical universe. It systematically directs one to the root of all existence, the Supreme Lord, and thus culminates in devotional service - because after distinguishing spirit from matter, the natural progression is to become detached from matter and wholeheartedly attached to Krishna. Srila Prabhupada thus focuses in on the essence of sankhya-yoga, which is pure devotional service ( bhakti-yoga ).

Previous Varieties of Varnasrama Next Defining Sankhya-yoga Last updated 1 year ago

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33)

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Lord Kapiladeva instructed His mother, Devahuti, in the science of sankhya-yoga. This is an ancient philosophical system which analyses the elemental make-up of the physical universe. It systematically directs one to the root of all existence, the Supreme Lord, and thus culminates in devotional service - because after distinguishing spirit from matter, the natural progression is to become detached from matter and wholeheartedly attached to Krishna. Srila Prabhupada thus focuses in on the essence of sankhya-yoga, which is pure devotional service ( bhakti-yoga ).

Previous Varieties of Varnasrama Next Defining Sankhya-yoga Last updated 1 year ago

Astanga-yoga

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Astanga-yoga Chapter 28 Kapiladeva next explained the process of astanga-yoga , which ultimately leads to meditation on the Lord’s form. He elucidated eight stages of the yoga practice ( yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana and samadhi ). Going deeper, Kapiladeva offered a beautiful description of the Lord’s form upon which one can focus the mind when practising meditation ( dhyana ). He then described the mindset and perfection of the yogi.

Previous Material Nature Next Bhakti-yoga Last updated 1 year ago

Bhakti-yoga

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Bhakti-yoga Chapter 29 The progressive yogi moves from sankhya towards bhakti . Kapiladeva thus described the science of bhakti-yoga . He detailed how devotional service can be practised in three modes of material nature. In ignorance ( tamas ) it is executed with envy, pride, violence and anger, in passion ( rajas ) it is executed with motives for material enjoyment, fame and opulence, and in goodness ( sattva ) it is executed out of duty, with a spirit of detachment and for self-purification. When one in situated in pure devotional service, the mind is spontaneously attracted to hearing about the Lord, the desire for any kind of liberation disappears and one transcends the modes and is fixed in spiritual purity ( vasudeva state ). Kapiladeva also described the vision of an advanced devotee, who sees the Lord within every living being ( jiva ), and thus embodies a friendly spirit toward all, carefully avoiding any offences. While cultivating such vision, the devotee still exercises discrimination based on gradations of jivas in order to relate to them appropriately.

Previous Astanga-yoga Next Worldly Entanglement (Samsara) Last updated 1 year ago

Defining Sankhya-yoga

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Defining Sankhya-yoga Chapter 25 Saunaka Rishi requests Suta Goswami to continue narrating the fascinating conversation between Maitreya and Vidura, in which they recalled the discussions between Devahuti and Lord Kapila. Recalling Brahma’s prediction, Devahuti approached Kapiladeva for instruction, feeling frustrated that her mind and senses had led her into materialistic life. Kapiladeva proceeded to describe the process of sankhya-yoga and other key spiritual principles. Kapiladeva stressed that the mind must be freed from the impurities of the modes of material nature ( gunas ) and the false identifications of ‘I’ and ‘mine.’ Only after such purification can one’s mind become strongly attached to the Lord. Bhakti is the best process for transforming the mind, especially when practised in the company of saintly people. The association of pure devotees awakens faith ( sraddha ), attraction ( rati ) and pure devotion ( bhakti ). Indeed, if one becomes attached to such saintly personalities, the doors to liberation are opened. As one engages in uncontaminated bhakti, various symptoms of spiritual advancement begin to manifest within the practitioner. Interestingly, devotion is so valuable that practitioners of any yoga system require some element of bhakti to be incorporated to achieve their respective goals.

Previous S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Next Material Nature Last updated 1 year ago

Detached Attachment

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Detached Attachment “Sankhya philosophy, as is well known, deals with prakrti and purusa . Purusa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead or anyone who imitates the Supreme Personality of Godhead as an enjoyer, and prakrti means “nature.” In this material world, material nature is being exploited by the purusas , or the living entities. The intricacies in the material world of the relationship of the prakrti and purusa , or the enjoyed and the enjoyer, is called samsara , or material entanglement. Devahuti wanted to cut the tree of material entanglement, and she found the suitable weapon in Kapila Muni. The tree of material existence is explained in the Fifteenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gita as an asvattha tree whose root is upwards and whose branches are downwards. It is recommended there that one has to cut the root of this material existential tree with the ax of detachment. What is the attachment? The attachment involves prakrti and purusa . The living entities are trying to lord it over material nature. Since the conditioned soul takes material nature to be the object of his enjoyment and he takes the position of the enjoyer, he is therefore called purusa .” (SB 3.25.11)

Previous Devahuti’s Prayers and Kapila’s Renunciation Next Monkey Business Last updated 1 year ago

Detach to Attach

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Detached Attachment Detach to Attach Kapiladeva didn’t simply talk of detachment from material nature, but also explained the path of bhakti and attachment to Krishna as the natural complement to this. Desires cannot be extinguished, but simply redirected to their original and natural spiritual source, and one should therefore re-establish their loving connection with Krishna. One who is attracted to matter and detached from Krishna is a materialist. Their philosophy is “eat, drink, be merry and enjoy” and they rarely contemplate anything else. When one is attracted to matter and attracted to Krishna, they are a mixed devotee ( misra-bhakta ). They know their higher goal but find it difficult to detach themselves from the temporary pleasures around them. When one is detached from matter and detached from Krishna, they are known as impersonalists. They see the falsity of this world and develop a disinterest in its allurements, yet fail to connect themselves to the positive source of happiness. Only the pure devotee, detached from matter and attached to Krishna, finds true happiness. Thus, we see a dual presentation throughout the pages of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Whether in the stories, the discourses, or Srila Prabhupada’s purports, there is a constant reminder of the futility of material enjoyment, along with inspirational narrations of the exquisiteness of pure spirituality. Only when we let go of the material can we fully grasp the spiritual, and this complete theme is seen in the teachings of Kapiladeva. Just as a university has admission criteria, the qualification for entering true bhakti is that one has no more faith in material desires. Practising spiritual life while harbouring material attachments is like rowing a boat with the anchor down – we’ll simply go around in circles and not make much progress at all. Srila Prabhupada explains further: “The whole spiritual process leads to perfect knowledge of everything material and spiritual, and the results of such perfect knowledge are that one becomes detached from material affection and becomes attached to spiritual activities. Becoming detached from material things does not mean becoming inert altogether, as men with a poor fund of knowledge think” (SB 1.2.7)

Previous Monkey Business Next S.K.I.P Last updated 1 year ago

Monkey Business

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Detached Attachment Monkey Business In times of the past, monkeys would routinely destroy crops in the fields. The farmers, non-violent at heart, wanted to employ some way of catching the monkeys without inflicting permanent injury on them. “After observing these monkeys and their habits” one wise farmer said. “I’ve discovered a way to catch them without hurting them.” To demonstrate, he cut a small hole in a coconut, just big enough so the monkey could slide its hand in. He then tied the coconut to a tree and put a banana inside. In practically no time a monkey came and, smelling banana, put his hand inside the coconut and grabbed his lunch. When he tried to pull his hand out, however, his clenched fist wouldn’t pass out of the small hole! As the wise farmer began climbing up the tree, the monkey had a decision to make. Although he could let go of the banana, withdraw his hand, and jump to safety in the next tree, he instead opted to hold on tightly and struggle. The monkey was his own hostage. Though screeching and struggling, the man calmly walked up to the monkey and captured him. Job done! They hung hundreds of coconuts, filled them with hundreds of bananas and caught hundreds of monkeys. The moral of the story: attachment is monkey-business! On a more serious note, the story is a graphic example of how attachment binds us to this world. The monkey placed a greater value on the banana than his own freedom. In the same way, the defect of the conditioned soul is his perpetual attraction towards temporary sense objects, which not only fail to satisfy his desires, but simultaneously divert him from the real source of happiness. Philosophical systems like sankhya break down the principles of matter and help to awaken a detachment within us. For example, one may see a sumptuous cake and be immediately drawn to devour it. If, however, we break apart the cake and view it as its separate ingredients (flour, butter, sugar, etc.), it doesn’t hold the same attraction. In the same way, sankhya helps one to look at the world from a more detached and sober perspective by dissecting it into its constituent elements.

Previous Detached Attachment Next Detach to Attach Last updated 1 year ago

Devahuti’s Prayers and Kapila’s Renunciation

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Devahuti’s Prayers and Kapila’s Renunciation Chapter 33 In reply to Devahuti’s prayers and glorification, Kapiladeva stressed the practicality and power of devotional service in releasing one from all material entanglement. Having fulfilled His mission, Kapiladeva left home. Devahuti dedicated herself to the path and became so detached, enlightened, and absorbed, that she became indifferent to even the most basic bodily necessities. Kapiladeva left for the northern mountain ranges, while Devahuti eventually achieved liberation and the perfection of life.

Previous Worldly Entanglement (Samsara) Next Detached Attachment Last updated 1 year ago

Material Nature

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Material Nature Chapter 26, 27 Kapiladeva then began a technical explanation of the material elements and energies of the Lord. Sankhya philosophy helps the living entity cut his knot of attachment to the temporary world by breaking down the various constituents of material nature and removing its superficial allure. Although a devotee knows bhakti is supreme, he utilises such philosophical analysis to fortify his detachment and disinterest in the objects of material enjoyment. Kapiladeva explained the union and interaction between the Supreme enjoyer ( purusa ), material nature ( prakrti ) and the living being ( jiva ). He then delineated a breakdown of the elements of prakrti , the universal egg and its various coverings, and then described the Universal Form. On a practical level, Kapiladeva discussed the qualities one should cultivate for spiritual success, how to intensify one’s spiritual practice and the rarity of liberation and spiritual perfection.

Previous Defining Sankhya-yoga Next Astanga-yoga Last updated 1 year ago

Worldly Entanglement (Samsara)

S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Worldly Entanglement (Samsara) Chapter 30, 31, 32 Having described the transcendental systems of spiritual elevation, Kapiladeva next tackled the harsh realities of life in the material world. Material detachment and spiritual attachment, after all, go hand-in-hand. Kapiladeva first depicted the archetype lifestyle of an entangled materialist. Everyone is subject to the destructive influence of time, which strips us of everything and exposes all objects of pleasure in this world (home, family, wealth, etc.) as fleeting and temporary. Due to illusion, however, living entities consider themselves happy and satisfied with petty pleasures, thinking various attachments to be valuable sources of happiness. Such attachments force them to work hard, perform unlawful actions and struggle on in life, with meagre (if any) reciprocation for their efforts. Eventually, disease and death catch up with them. After leaving the body, the Yamadutas escort them to hellish conditions of life where they suffer incredible torture. It’s not a pretty picture. After going through the evolutionary cycle, the soul receives a human body under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and in accordance with his karmic bank balance. The soul is transferred via the semen of the father into the womb of the mother and then evolves as an embryo. Struggling in that alien environment and constantly tormented by the harsh confinement, the baby sincerely prays to the Lord for help. After birth, the child suffers unavoidable inconveniences which continue at every stage of life. Throughout all these miserable experiences, the powerful attraction between man and woman keeps the conditioned soul bound in this vicious cycle. Though it may sound pessimistic and glum, hearing of these struggles with a sober mind helps one to see the naked reality and develop the strength to transcend it. Many householders simply engage in ritual religiosity ( dharma ), economic development ( arta ) and sense gratification ( kama ), and thus never reach the point of devotional service ( bhakti ). Although they achieve elevation to higher planets, they ultimately return to the earthly realm and its concomitant miseries. The wise, however, function under the principles of duty, detachment and devotion, and thus attain perfection. This is the perfect path that Kapiladeva recommends.

Previous Bhakti-yoga Next Devahuti’s Prayers and Kapila’s Renunciation Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.1

↗
శ్రీభగవానువాచ కర్మణా దైవనేత్రేణ జన్తుర్దేహోపపత్తయే । స్త్రియా: ప్రవిష్ట ఉదరం పుంసో రేత:కణాశ్రయ: ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
[shree-bhagavaan uvaacha]
karmaṇā daiva-netreṇa
[karmanaa daiva-netrena]
jantur dehopapattaye
[jantur dehopapattaye]
striyāḥ praviṣṭa udaraṁ
[striyaah pravishta udaram]
puṁso retaḥ-kaṇāśrayaḥ
[pumso retah-kanaashrayah]
śrī-bhagavān uvāca — the Supreme Personality of Godhead said karmaṇā — by the result of work daiva-netreṇa — under the supervision of the Lord jantuḥ — the living entity deha — a body upapattaye — for obtaining striyāḥ — of a woman praviṣṭaḥ — enters udaram — the womb puṁsaḥ — of a man retaḥ — of semen kaṇa — a particle āśrayaḥ — dwelling in.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
the Supreme Personality of Godhead said
karmaṇā daiva-netreṇa
karmaṇā
by the result of work
daiva-netreṇa
under the supervision of the Lord
jantur dehopapattaye
jantuḥ
the living entity
deha
a body
upapattaye
for obtaining
striyāḥ praviṣṭa udaraṁ
striyāḥ
of a woman
praviṣṭaḥ
enters
udaram
the womb
puṁso retaḥ-kaṇāśrayaḥ
puṁsaḥ
of a man
retaḥ
of semen
kaṇa
a particle
āśrayaḥ
dwelling in.
The Personality of Godhead said: Under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and according to the result of his work, the living entity, the soul, is made to enter into the womb of a woman through the particle of male semen to assume a particular type of body.

As stated in the last chapter, after suffering different kinds of hellish conditions, a man comes again to the human form of body. The same topic is continued in this chapter. In order to give a particular type of human form to a person who has already suffered hellish life, the soul is transferred to the semen of a man who is just suitable to become his father. During sexual intercourse, the soul is transferred through the semen of the father into the mother’s womb in order to produce a particular type of body. This process is applicable to all embodied living entities, but it is especially mentioned for the man who was transferred to the Andha-tāmisra hell. After suffering there, when he who has had many types of hellish bodies, like those of dogs and hogs, is to come again to the human form, he is given the chance to take his birth in the same type of body from which he degraded himself to hell.

Everything is done by the supervision of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Material nature supplies the body, but it does so under the direction of the Supersoul. It is said in Bhagavad-gītā that a living entity is wandering in this material world on a chariot made by material nature. The Supreme Lord, as Supersoul, is always present with the individual soul. He directs material nature to supply a particular type of body to the individual soul according to the result of his work, and the material nature supplies it. Here one word, retaḥ-kaṇāśrayaḥ, is very significant because it indicates that it is not the semen of the man that creates life within the womb of a woman; rather, the living entity, the soul, takes shelter in a particle of semen and is then pushed into the womb of a woman. Then the body develops. There is no possibility of creating a living entity without the presence of the soul simply by sexual intercourse. The materialistic theory that there is no soul and that a child is born simply by material combination of the sperm and ovum is not very feasible. It is unacceptable.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord said: The jīva about to receive a human body by the law of karma, under the supervision of the Lord, taking shelter of a particle of semen from a man, enters the womb of a woman. In the Thirty-first Chapter the pains in the womb, at birth, as an infant, and as a child, as well as bhakti of the jīva as it speaks in the womb are explained. Now Kapila shows how the living entity again returns to the human species. The jīva enters a human body by previous karmas, which are put into action (netra) by the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.2

↗
కలలం త్వేకరాత్రేణ పఞ్చరాత్రేణ బుద్బుదమ్ । దశాహేన తు కర్కన్ధూ: పేశ్యణ్డం వా తత: పరమ్ ॥ ౨ ॥
kalalaṁ tv eka-rātreṇa
[kalalam tv eka-raatrena]
paṣca-rātreṇa budbudam
[pashcha-raatrena budbudam]
daśāhena tu karkandhūḥ
[dashaahena tu karkandhooh]
peśy aṇḍaṁ vā tataḥ param
[peshy andam vaa tatah param]
kalalam — mixing of the sperm and ovum tu — then eka-rātreṇa — on the first night paṣca-rātreṇa — by the fifth night budbudam — a bubble daśa-ahena — in ten days tu — then karkandhūḥ — like a plum peśī — a lump of flesh aṇḍam — an egg vā — or tataḥ — thence param — afterwards.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kalalaṁ tv eka-rātreṇa
kalalam
mixing of the sperm and ovum
paṣca-rātreṇa budbudam
daśāhena tu karkandhūḥ
tu
then
eka-rātreṇa
on the first night
peśy aṇḍaṁ vā tataḥ param
paṣca-rātreṇa
by the fifth night
budbudam
a bubble
daśa-ahena
in ten days
tu
then
karkandhūḥ
like a plum
peśī
a lump of flesh
aṇḍam
an egg
vā
or
tataḥ
thence
param
afterwards.
On the first night, the sperm and ovum mix, and on the fifth night the mixture ferments into a bubble. On the tenth night it develops into a form like a plum, and after that, it gradually turns into a lump of flesh or an egg, as the case may be.

The body of the soul develops in four different ways according to its different sources. One kind of body, that of the trees and plants, sprouts from the earth; the second kind of body grows from perspiration, as with flies, germs and bugs; the third kind of body develops from eggs; and the fourth develops from an embryo. This verse indicates that after emulsification of the ovum and sperm, the body gradually develops either into a lump of flesh or into an egg, as the case may be. In the case of birds it develops into an egg, and in the case of animals and human beings it develops into a lump of flesh.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
On the first night, the semen mixes with blood. By the fifth night, it forms a bubble shape. After ten days, it becomes the size of a hard badarī fruit, and then ball of flesh in the case of womb-born, or an egg in the case of birds. Kalalam is a mixture of semen and blood. Budbudam is the shape of a bubble. Karkandhū is the shape of a hard badarī fruit.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.3

↗
మాసేన తు శిరో ద్వాభ్యాం బాహ్వఙ్‌ఘ్ర్యాద్యఙ్గవిగ్రహ: । నఖలోమాస్థిచర్మాణి లిఙ్గచ్ఛిద్రోద్భవస్త్రిభి: ॥ ౩ ॥
māsena tu śiro dvābhyāṁ
[maasena tu shiro dvaabhyaam]
bāhv-aṅghry-ādy-aṅga-vigrahaḥ
[baahv-anghry-aady-anga-vigrahah]
nakha-lomāsthi-carmāṇi
[nakha-lomaasthi-charmaani]
liṅga-cchidrodbhavas tribhiḥ
[linga-chchidrodbhavas tribhih]
māsena — within a month tu — then śiraḥ — a head dvābhyām — in two months bāhu — arms aṅghri — feet ādi — and so on aṅga — limbs vigrahaḥ — form nakha — nails loma — body hair asthi — bones carmāṇi — and skin liṅga — organ of generation chidra — apertures udbhavaḥ — appearance tribhiḥ — within three months.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māsena tu śiro dvābhyāṁ
māsena
within a month
tu
then
śiraḥ
a head
dvābhyām
in two months
bāhv-aṅghry-ādy-aṅga-vigrahaḥ
bāhu
arms
aṅghri
feet
ādi
and so on
aṅga
limbs
vigrahaḥ
form
nakha-lomāsthi-carmāṇi
nakha
nails
loma
body hair
asthi
bones
carmāṇi
and skin
liṅga-cchidrodbhavas tribhiḥ
liṅga
organ of generation
chidra
apertures
udbhavaḥ
appearance
tribhiḥ
within three months.
In the course of a month, a head is formed, and at the end of two months the hands, feet and other limbs take shape. By the end of three months, the nails, fingers, toes, body hair, bones and skin appear, as do the organ of generation and the other apertures in the body, namely the eyes, nostrils, ears, mouth and anus.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By two months, the embryo develops head, arms, legs, and other limbs. By three months, nails, body hair, bones and skin, the genital and sense apertures appear. By two months the form develops limbs.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.4

↗
చతుర్భిర్ధాతవ: సప్త పఞ్చభి: క్షుత్తృడుద్భవ: । షడ్‌భిర్జరాయుణా వీత: కుక్షౌ భ్రామ్యతి దక్షిణే ॥ ౪ ॥
caturbhir dhātavaḥ sapta
[chaturbhir dhaatavah sapta]
paṣcabhiḥ kṣut-tṛḍ-udbhavaḥ
[pashchabhih kshut-trid-udbhavah]
ṣaḍbhir jarāyuṇā vītaḥ
[shadbhir jaraayunaa veetah]
kukṣau bhrāmyati dakṣiṇe
[kukshau bhraamyati dakshine]
caturbhiḥ — within four months dhātavaḥ — ingredients sapta — seven paṣcabhiḥ — within five months kṣut-tṛṭ — of hunger and thirst udbhavaḥ — appearance ṣaḍbhiḥ — within six months jarāyuṇā — by the amnion vītaḥ — enclosed kukṣau — in the abdomen bhrāmyati — moves dakṣiṇe — on the right side.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
caturbhir dhātavaḥ sapta
caturbhiḥ
within four months
dhātavaḥ
ingredients
sapta
seven
paṣcabhiḥ kṣut-tṛḍ-udbhavaḥ
paṣcabhiḥ
within five months
kṣut-tṛṭ
of hunger and thirst
udbhavaḥ
appearance
ṣaḍbhir jarāyuṇā vītaḥ
ṣaḍbhiḥ
within six months
jarāyuṇā
by the amnion
vītaḥ
enclosed
kukṣau bhrāmyati dakṣiṇe
kukṣau
in the abdomen
bhrāmyati
moves
dakṣiṇe
on the right side.
Within four months from the date of conception, the seven essential ingredients of the body, namely chyle, blood, flesh, fat, bone, marrow and semen, come into existence. At the end of five months, hunger and thirst make themselves felt, and at the end of six months, the fetus, enclosed by the amnion, begins to move on the right side of the abdomen.

When the body of the child is completely formed at the end of six months, the child, if he is male, begins to move on the right side, and if female, she tries to move on the left side.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By the fourth month, the seven dhātus appear, and by the fifth month hunger and thirst appear. By the sixth month, the skin forms around the embryo and it moves to the right side of the womb. The body is surrounded (vītaḥ) by the womb covering (jarāyuṇā). The right side is mentioned because the subject being dealt with is a male. It is well know that the male fetus moves to the right and the female fetus moves to the left.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.5

↗
మాతుర్జగ్ధాన్నపానాద్యైరేధద్ధాతురసమ్మతే । శేతే విణ్మూత్రయోర్గర్తే స జన్తుర్జన్తుసమ్భవే ॥ ౫ ॥
mātur jagdhānna-pānādyair
[maatur jagdhaanna-paanaadyair]
edhad-dhātur asammate
[edhad-dhaatur asammate]
śete viṇ-mūtrayor garte
[shete vin-mootrayor garte]
sa jantur jantu-sambhave
[sa jantur jantu-sambhave]
mātuḥ — of the mother jagdha — taken anna-pāna — by the food and drink ādyaiḥ — and so on edhat — increasing dhātuḥ — the ingredients of his body asammate — abominable śete — remains viṭ-mūtrayoḥ — of stools and urine garte — in a hollow saḥ — that jantuḥ — fetus jantu — of worms sambhave — the breeding place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mātur jagdhānna-pānādyair
mātuḥ
of the mother
jagdha
taken
anna-pāna
by the food and drink
ādyaiḥ
and so on
edhad-dhātur asammate
edhat
increasing
dhātuḥ
the ingredients of his body
asammate
abominable
śete viṇ-mūtrayor garte
śete
remains
viṭ-mūtrayoḥ
of stools and urine
garte
in a hollow
sa jantur jantu-sambhave
saḥ
that
jantuḥ
fetus
jantu
of worms
sambhave
the breeding place.
Deriving its nutrition from the food and drink taken by the mother, the fetus grows and remains in that abominable residence of stools and urine, which is the breeding place of all kinds of worms.

In the Mārkaṇḍeya Purāṇa it is said that in the intestine of the mother the umbilical cord, which is known as āpyāyanī, joins the mother to the abdomen of the child, and through this passage the child within the womb accepts the mother’s assimilated foodstuff. In this way the child is fed by the mother’s intestine within the womb and grows from day to day. The statement of the Mārkaṇḍeya Purāṇa about the child’s situation within the womb is exactly corroborated by modern medical science, and thus the authority of the Purāṇas cannot be disproved, as is sometimes attempted by the Māyāvādī philosophers.

Since the child depends completely on the assimilated foodstuff of the mother, during pregnancy there are restrictions on the food taken by the mother. Too much salt, chili, onion and similar food is forbidden for the pregnant mother because the child’s body is too delicate and new for him to tolerate such pungent food. Restrictions and precautions to be taken by the pregnant mother, as enunciated in the smṛti scriptures of Vedic literature, are very useful. We can understand from the Vedic literature how much care is taken to beget a nice child in society. The garbhādhāna ceremony before sexual intercourse was compulsory for persons in the higher grades of society, and it is very scientific. Other processes recommended in the Vedic literature during pregnancy are also very important. To take care of the child is the primary duty of the parents because if such care is taken, society will be filled with good population to maintain the peace and prosperity of the society, country and human race.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nourishing its dhātus by food and liquids from the mother, the fetus sleeps in the unsuitable hole for stool and urine, where birth takes place. It is said: nāḍicāpyāyanī nāmanābhyāṁ tasya nibadhyate strīṇāṁ tathāntra-śuṣire sa nibaddho ’pajāyate kramante bhukta-pītānī strīṇāṁ garbhodare tathā tair āpyāyita deho ’sau jantur vṛddhim upaiti ca The male fetus is bound up with arteries and veins within the womb of women. All that the women eat and drink passes into the womb. The fetus becomes nourished by this, and it grows. Mārkandeya Purāṇa 11.11
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.6

↗
కృమిభి: క్షతసర్వాఙ్గ: సౌకుమార్యాత్ప్రతిక్షణమ్ । మూర్చ్ఛామాప్నోత్యురుక్లేశస్తత్రత్యై: క్షుధితైర్ముహు: ॥ ౬ ॥
kṛmibhiḥ kṣata-sarvāṅgaḥ
[krimibhih kshata-sarvaangah]
saukumāryāt pratikṣaṇam
[saukumaaryaat pratikshanam]
mūrcchām āpnoty uru-kleśas
[moorchchaam aapnoty uru-kleshas]
tatratyaiḥ kṣudhitair muhuḥ
[tatratyaih kshudhitair muhuh]
kṛmibhiḥ — by worms kṣata — bitten sarva-aṅgaḥ — all over the body saukumāryāt — because of tenderness prati-kṣaṇam — moment after moment mūrcchām — unconsciousness āpnoti — he obtains uru-kleśaḥ — whose suffering is great tatratyaiḥ — being there (in the abdomen) kṣudhitaiḥ — hungry muhuḥ — again and again.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛmibhiḥ kṣata-sarvāṅgaḥ
kṛmibhiḥ
by worms
kṣata
bitten
sarva-aṅgaḥ
all over the body
saukumāryāt pratikṣaṇam
saukumāryāt
because of tenderness
prati-kṣaṇam
moment after moment
mūrcchām āpnoty uru-kleśas
mūrcchām
unconsciousness
āpnoti
he obtains
uru-kleśaḥ
whose suffering is great
tatratyaiḥ kṣudhitair muhuḥ
tatratyaiḥ
being there (in the abdomen)
kṣudhitaiḥ
hungry
muhuḥ
again and again.
Bitten again and again all over the body by the hungry worms in the abdomen itself, the child suffers terrible agony because of his tenderness. He thus becomes unconscious moment after moment because of the terrible condition.

The miserable condition of material existence is not only felt when we come out of the womb of the mother, but is also present within the womb. Miserable life begins from the moment the living entity begins to contact his material body. Unfortunately, we forget this experience and do not take the miseries of birth very seriously. In Bhagavad-gītā, therefore, it is specifically mentioned that one should be very alert to understand the specific difficulties of birth and death. Just as during the formation of this body we have to pass through so many difficulties within the womb of the mother, at the time of death there are also many difficulties. As described in the previous chapter, one has to transmigrate from one body to another, and the transmigration into the bodies of dogs and hogs is especially miserable. But despite such miserable conditions, due to the spell of māyā we forget everything and become enamored by the present so-called happiness, which is described as actually no more than a counteraction to distress.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of the fetus’s soft condition, all its limbs are injured by hunger worms situated there at all times. Under great pain, the fetus faints continually.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.7

↗
కటుతీక్ష్ణోష్ణలవణరూక్షామ్‍లాదిభిరుల్బణై: । మాతృభుక్తైరుపస్పృష్ట: సర్వాఙ్గోత్థితవేదన: ॥ ౭ ॥
kaṭu-tīkṣṇoṣṇa-lavaṇa-
[katu-teekshnoshna-lavana-]
rūkṣāmlādibhir ulbaṇaiḥ
[rookshaamlaadibhir ulbanaih]
mātṛ-bhuktair upaspṛṣṭaḥ
[maatri-bhuktair upasprishtah]
sarvāṅgotthita-vedanaḥ
[sarvaangotthita-vedanah]
kaṭu — bitter tīkṣṇa — pungent uṣṇa — hot lavaṇa — salty rūkṣa — dry amla — sour ādibhiḥ — and so on ulbaṇaiḥ — excessive mātṛ-bhuktaiḥ — by foods eaten by the mother upaspṛṣṭaḥ — affected sarva-aṅga — all over the body utthita — arisen vedanaḥ — pain.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaṭu-tīkṣṇoṣṇa-lavaṇa-
kaṭu
bitter
tīkṣṇa
pungent
uṣṇa
hot
lavaṇa
salty
rūkṣāmlādibhir ulbaṇaiḥ
rūkṣa
dry
amla
sour
ādibhiḥ
and so on
ulbaṇaiḥ
excessive
mātṛ-bhuktair upaspṛṣṭaḥ
mātṛ-bhuktaiḥ
by foods eaten by the mother
upaspṛṣṭaḥ
affected
sarvāṅgotthita-vedanaḥ
sarva-aṅga
all over the body
utthita
arisen
vedanaḥ
pain.
Owing to the mother’s eating bitter, pungent foodstuffs, or food which is too salty or too sour, the body of the child incessantly suffers pains which are almost intolerable.

All descriptions of the child’s bodily situation in the womb of the mother are beyond our conception. It is very difficult to remain in such a position, but still the child has to remain. Because his consciousness is not very developed, the child can tolerate it, otherwise he would die. That is the benediction of māyā, who endows the suffering body with the qualifications for tolerating such terrible tortures.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
All its limbs suffer from contact with the mother’s food, which is difficult to tolerate if it is too bitter, pungent, hot, salty, dry or sour. Ulbaṇaiḥ means “difficult to tolerate.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.8

↗
ఉల్బేన సంవృతస్తస్మిన్నన్త్రైశ్చ బహిరావృత: । ఆస్తే కృత్వా శిర: కుక్షౌ భుగ్నపృష్ఠశిరోధర: ॥ ౮ ॥
ulbena saṁvṛtas tasminn
[ulbena samvritas tasminn]
antraiś ca bahir āvṛtaḥ
[antraish cha bahir aavritah]
āste kṛtvā śiraḥ kukṣau
[aaste kritvaa shirah kukshau]
bhugna-pṛṣṭha-śirodharaḥ
[bhugna-prishtha-shirodharah]
ulbena — by the amnion saṁvṛtaḥ — enclosed tasmin — in that place antraiḥ — by the intestines ca — and bahiḥ — outside āvṛtaḥ — covered āste — he lies kṛtvā — having put śiraḥ — the head kukṣau — towards the belly bhugna — bent pṛṣṭha — back śiraḥ-dharaḥ — neck.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ulbena saṁvṛtas tasminn
ulbena
by the amnion
saṁvṛtaḥ
enclosed
tasmin
in that place
antraiś ca bahir āvṛtaḥ
antraiḥ
by the intestines
ca
and
bahiḥ
outside
āvṛtaḥ
covered
āste kṛtvā śiraḥ kukṣau
āste
he lies
kṛtvā
having put
śiraḥ
the head
kukṣau
towards the belly
bhugna-pṛṣṭha-śirodharaḥ
bhugna
bent
pṛṣṭha
back
śiraḥ-dharaḥ
neck.
Placed within the amnion and covered outside by the intestines, the child remains lying on one side of the abdomen, his head turned towards his belly and his back and neck arched like a bow.

If a grown man were put into such a condition as the child within the abdomen, completely entangled in all respects, it would be impossible for him to live even for a few seconds. Unfortunately, we forget all these sufferings and try to be happy in this life, not caring for the liberation of the soul from the entanglement of birth and death. It is an unfortunate civilization in which these matters are not plainly discussed to make people understand the precarious condition of material existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The fetus remains there, surrounded by a covering and outside that, by the entrails. Its head is near its stomach, with bent neck and back. Its neck and back are crooked because of the covering.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.9

↗
అకల్ప: స్వాఙ్గచేష్టాయాం శకున్త ఇవ పఞ్జరే । తత్ర లబ్ధస్మృతిర్దైవాత్కర్మ జన్మశతోద్భవమ్ । స్మరన్దీర్ఘమనుచ్ఛ్‌వాసం శర్మ కిం నామ విన్దతే ॥ ౯ ॥
akalpaḥ svāṅga-ceṣṭāyāṁ
[akalpah svaanga-cheshtaayaam]
śakunta iva paṣjare
[shakunta iva pashjare]
tatra labdha-smṛtir daivāt
[tatra labdha-smritir daivaat]
karma janma-śatodbhavam
[karma janma-shatodbhavam]
smaran dīrgham anucchvāsaṁ
[smaran deergham anuchchvaasam]
śarma kiṁ nāma vindate
[sharma kim naama vindate]
akalpaḥ — unable sva-aṅga — his limbs ceṣṭāyām — to move śakuntaḥ — a bird iva — like paṣjare — in a cage tatra — there labdha-smṛtiḥ — having gained his memory daivāt — by fortune karma — activities janma-śata-udbhavam — occurring during the last hundred births smaran — remembering dīrgham — for a long time anucchvāsam — sighing śarma — peace of mind kim — what nāma — then vindate — can he achieve.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
akalpaḥ svāṅga-ceṣṭāyāṁ
akalpaḥ
unable
sva-aṅga
his limbs
ceṣṭāyām
to move
śakunta iva paṣjare
śakuntaḥ
a bird
iva
like
paṣjare
in a cage
tatra labdha-smṛtir daivāt
tatra
there
labdha-smṛtiḥ
having gained his memory
daivāt
by fortune
karma janma-śatodbhavam
karma
activities
janma-śata-udbhavam
occurring during the last hundred births
smaran dīrgham anucchvāsaṁ
smaran
remembering
dīrgham
for a long time
anucchvāsam
sighing
śarma kiṁ nāma vindate
śarma
peace of mind
kim
what
nāma
then
vindate
can he achieve.
The child thus remains just like a bird in a cage, without freedom of movement. At that time, if the child is fortunate, he can remember all the troubles of his past one hundred births, and he grieves wretchedly. What is the possibility of peace of mind in that condition?

After birth the child may forget about the difficulties of his past lives, but when we are grown-up we can at least understand the grievous tortures undergone at birth and death by reading the authorized scriptures like Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. If we do not believe in the scriptures, that is a different question, but if we have faith in the authority of such descriptions, then we must prepare for our freedom in the next life; that is possible in this human form of life. One who does not take heed of these indications of suffering in human existence is said to be undoubtedly committing suicide. It is said that this human form of life is the only means for crossing over the nescience of māyā, or material existence. We have a very efficient boat in this human form of body, and there is a very expert captain, the spiritual master; the scriptural injunctions are like favorable winds. If we do not cross over the ocean of the nescience of material existence in spite of all these facilities, then certainly we are all intentionally committing suicide.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Unable to move, like a bird in a cage, there the embryo remembers by influence of previous karmas his actions stemming from a hundred lives. This produces sighing for a long time. What happiness can he enjoy? Śaukuntaḥ is a bird. Under the influence of previous karmas (daivāt) he remembers his actions, in such a way to produce sighing for a long time.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.10

↗
ఆరభ్య సప్తమాన్మాసాల్లబ్ధబోధోఽపి వేపిత: । నైకత్రాస్తే సూతివాతైర్విష్ఠాభూరివ సోదర: ॥ ౧౦ ॥
ārabhya saptamān māsāl
[aarabhya saptamaan maasaal]
labdha-bodho ’pi vepitaḥ
[labdha-bodho ’pi vepitah]
naikatrāste sūti-vātair
[naikatraaste sooti-vaatair]
viṣṭhā-bhūr iva sodaraḥ
[vishthaa-bhoor iva sodarah]
ārabhya — beginning saptamāt māsāt — from the seventh month labdha-bodhaḥ — endowed with consciousness api — although vepitaḥ — tossed na — not ekatra — in one place āste — he remains sūti-vātaiḥ — by the winds for childbirth viṣṭhā-bhūḥ — the worm iva — like sa-udaraḥ — born of the same womb.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ārabhya saptamān māsāl
ārabhya
beginning
saptamāt māsāt
from the seventh month
labdha-bodho ’pi vepitaḥ
labdha-bodhaḥ
endowed with consciousness
api
although
vepitaḥ
tossed
naikatrāste sūti-vātair
na
not
ekatra
in one place
āste
he remains
sūti-vātaiḥ
by the winds for childbirth
viṣṭhā-bhūr iva sodaraḥ
viṣṭhā-bhūḥ
the worm
iva
like
sa-udaraḥ
born of the same womb.
Thus endowed with the development of consciousness from the seventh month after his conception, the child is tossed downward by the airs that press the embryo during the weeks preceding delivery. Like the worms born of the same filthy abdominal cavity, he cannot remain in one place.

At the end of the seventh month the child is moved by the bodily air and does not remain in the same place, for the entire uterine system becomes slackened before delivery. The worms have been described here as sodara. Sodara means “born of the same mother.” Since the child is born from the womb of the mother and the worms are also born of fermentation within the womb of the same mother, under the circumstances the child and the worms are actually brothers. We are very anxious to establish universal brotherhood among human beings, but we should take into consideration that even the worms are our brothers, what to speak of other living entities. Therefore, we should be concerned about all living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Beginning from the seventh month, he attains consciousness. Moved about by the air causing childbirth, like a worm born in the same womb, he cannot remain in one place. He is moved about (vepitaḥ) by the air causing childbirth, like the worms (viṣṭā-bhūḥ) born in the same womb.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.11

↗
నాథమాన ఋషిర్భీత: సప్తవధ్రి: కృతాఞ్జలి: । స్తువీత తం విక్లవయా వాచా యేనోదరేఽర్పిత: ॥ ౧౧ ॥
nāthamāna ṛṣir bhītaḥ
[naathamaana rishir bheetah]
sapta-vadhriḥ kṛtāṣjaliḥ
[sapta-vadhrih kritaashjalih]
stuvīta taṁ viklavayā
[stuveeta tam viklavayaa]
vācā yenodare ’rpitaḥ
[vaachaa yenodare ’rpitah]
nāthamānaḥ — appealing ṛṣiḥ — the living entity bhītaḥ — frightened sapta-vadhriḥ — bound by the seven layers kṛta-aṣjaliḥ — with folded hands stuvīta — prays tam — to the Lord viklavayā — faltering vācā — with words yena — by whom udare — in the womb arpitaḥ — he was placed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāthamāna ṛṣir bhītaḥ
nāthamānaḥ
appealing
ṛṣiḥ
the living entity
bhītaḥ
frightened
sapta-vadhriḥ kṛtāṣjaliḥ
sapta-vadhriḥ
bound by the seven layers
kṛta-aṣjaliḥ
with folded hands
stuvīta taṁ viklavayā
stuvīta
prays
tam
to the Lord
viklavayā
faltering
vācā yenodare ’rpitaḥ
vācā
with words
yena
by whom
udare
in the womb
arpitaḥ
he was placed.
The living entity in this frightful condition of life, bound by seven layers of material ingredients, prays with folded hands, appealing to the Lord, who has put him in that condition.

It is said that when a woman is having labor pains she promises that she will never again become pregnant and suffer from such a severely painful condition. Similarly, when one is undergoing some surgical operation he promises that he will never again act in such a way as to become diseased and have to undergo medical surgery, or when one falls into danger, he promises that he will never again make the same mistake. Similarly, the living entity, when put into a hellish condition of life, prays to the Lord that he will never again commit sinful activities and have to be put into the womb for repeated birth and death. In the hellish condition within the womb, the living entity is very much afraid of being born again, but when he is out of the womb, when he is in full life and good health, he forgets everything and commits again and again the same sins for which he was put into that horrible condition of existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wise devotee jīva, frightened and pleading, bound up by the seven dhātus, folding his hands, prays with distressed words to the Lord who has placed him in this place. He asks for blessings like “I should get the Lord’s mercy.” He who sees the ātmā (ṛṣiḥ) but, bound up the by seven dhātus, is frightened because of repeated birth, “should” pray with distressed words. Potential case is used, but it is impossible that it can mean that all jīvas must pray in this manner, since giving orders to embryos is not possible. It is used because of the relation of cause and effect. The cause is a person who should worship the Lord. Thus the person who should worship the Lord should pray in the womb. This means that other persons, who do not worship the Lord, would not pray in the womb. Thus, jīvas who do not praise the Lord will later be described in this scripture, and have also previously been described. Therefore, the prayers of the jīva in the womb mentioned here do not indicate that every jīva bound up in the material world prays in this manner, since that would contradict statements such as the following: akāmād api ye viṣṇoḥ sakṛt pūjāṁ prakurvate na teṣāṁ bhava-bandhas tu kadācid api jāyate Those who worship Viṣṇu once without material desire are not subject to bondage and no longer take birth. Nārada Purāṇa 1.36.57 sakṛd eva prapanno yas tavāsmīti ca yācate abhayaṁ sarvadā tasmai dadāmy etad vrataṁ mama I have made a vow that I will give fearlessness to that person he who surrenders and once says “I am yours.” Rāmāyaṇa, Yuddha-kāṇḍa 18.33 As well, the text does not say “The jīva at ten months, lying in the urine and stool, fainting because of great pain, and bent over, praises the Lord.” The present tense is not used. The past tense is used (jantuḥ uvāca in the next verse.) This indicates that a jīva who was a devotee prayed in this manner in the womb in the past. Not every jīva does so. Those skilled in derivation of meanings of words also declare this. After stating that in the ninth month the limbs are all formed and that the jīva says “I am again born and again die,” Garbhopaniṣad then says: avāṅmukhaḥ pīḍyamāno jantuś caivaṁ samanvitaḥ sāṅkhyaṁ yogaṁ samabhyasyet puruṣaṁ paṣcaviṁśakam tataś ca daśame māsi prajāyata The suffering embryo facing forward, endowed with Sāṅkhya-yoga, should worship the twenty-fifth person, the Supreme Lord. In the tenth month he is born. The word vā in the Upaniṣad indicates that some karmī jīvas remember their previous lives, some jṣānī jīvas practice Sāṅkhya-yoga, some yogī jīvas practice yoga, and that devotees should worship the item superior to the twenty-four elements, the Supreme Lord. It is logical to conclude that what was previously practiced will appear in the womb.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.12

↗
జన్తురువాచ తస్యోపసన్నమవితుం జగదిచ్ఛయాత్త- నానాతనోర్భువి చలచ్చరణారవిన్దమ్ । సోఽహం వ్రజామి శరణం హ్యకుతోభయం మే యేనేద‍ృశీ గతిరదర్శ్యసతోఽనురూపా ॥ ౧౨ ॥
jantur uvāca
[jantur uvaacha]
tasyopasannam avituṁ jagad icchayātta-
[tasyopasannam avitum jagad ichchayaatta-]
nānā-tanor bhuvi calac-caraṇāravindam
[naanaa-tanor bhuvi chalach-charanaaravindam]
so ’haṁ vrajāmi śaraṇaṁ hy akuto-bhayaṁ me
[so ’ham vrajaami sharanam hy akuto-bhayam me]
yenedṛśī gatir adarśy asato ’nurūpā
[yenedrishee gatir adarshy asato ’nuroopaa]
jantuḥ uvāca — the human soul says tasya — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead upasannam — having approached for protection avitum — to protect jagat — the universe icchayā — by His own will ātta-nānā-tanoḥ — who accepts various forms bhuvi — on the earth calat — walking caraṇa-aravindam — the lotus feet saḥ aham — I myself vrajāmi — go śaraṇam — unto the shelter hi — indeed akutaḥ-bhayam — giving relief from all fear me — for me yena — by whom īdṛśī — such gatiḥ — condition of life adarśi — was considered asataḥ — impious anurūpā — befitting.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jantur uvāca
jantuḥ uvāca
the human soul says
tasyopasannam avituṁ jagad icchayātta-
tasya
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
nānā-tanor bhuvi calac-caraṇāravindam
so ’haṁ vrajāmi śaraṇaṁ hy akuto-bhayaṁ me
yenedṛśī gatir adarśy asato ’nurūpā
upasannam
having approached for protection
avitum
to protect
jagat
the universe
icchayā
by His own will
ātta-nānā-tanoḥ
who accepts various forms
bhuvi
on the earth
calat
walking
caraṇa-aravindam
the lotus feet
saḥ aham
I myself
vrajāmi
go
śaraṇam
unto the shelter
hi
indeed
akutaḥ-bhayam
giving relief from all fear
me
for me
yena
by whom
īdṛśī
such
gatiḥ
condition of life
adarśi
was considered
asataḥ
impious
anurūpā
befitting.
The human soul says: I take shelter of the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who appears in His various eternal forms and walks on the surface of the world. I take shelter of Him only, because He can give me relief from all fear and from Him I have received this condition of life, which is just befitting my impious activities.

The word calac-caraṇāravindam refers to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who actually walks or travels upon the surface of the world. For example, Lord Rāmacandra actually walked on the surface of the world, and Lord Kṛṣṇa also walked just like an ordinary man. The prayer is therefore offered to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who descends to the surface of this earth, or any part of this universe, for the protection of the pious and the destruction of the impious. It is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā that when there is an increase of irreligion and discrepancies arise in the real religious activities, the Supreme Lord comes to protect the pious and kill the impious. This verse indicates Lord Kṛṣṇa.

Another significant point in this verse is that the Lord comes, icchayā, by His own will. As Kṛṣṇa confirms in Bhagavad-gītā, sambhavāmy ātma-māyayā: “I appear at My will, by My internal potency.” He is not forced to come by the laws of material nature. It is stated here, icchayā: He does not assume any form, as the impersonalists think, because He comes at His own will, and the form in which He descends is His eternal form. As the Supreme Lord puts the living entity into the condition of horrible existence, He can also deliver him, and therefore one should seek shelter at the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa demands, “Give up everything and surrender unto Me.” And it is also said in Bhagavad-gītā that anyone who approaches Him does not come back again to accept a form in material existence, but goes back to Godhead, back home, never to return.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The living entity said: I surrender to the lotus feet of the Lord which bestow fearlessness. The Lord will move on the earth, having accepted by his will all avatāras within himself to protect those of this world who approached him. By your mercy, I, being sinful, have attained this condition in the womb. Śrīdhara Svāmī says the “walking the earth” is in reference to Kṛṣṇa’s appearance on earth. Kṛṣṇa accepts many forms (ātta-nānā-tanoḥ), since all forms are included within him. According to Jīva Gosvāmī, Kapila says this in expectation of Kṛṣna’s appearance in the future. Since I am impure, this condition of living in an ocean of suffering in the womb has been shown (adarśi) to be befitting. Or adarśī can mean “I have not become the object of your glance of mercy.” You do not appear in front of me because I am sinful.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.13

↗
యస్త్వత్ర బద్ధ ఇవ కర్మభిరావృతాత్మా భూతేన్ద్రియాశయమయీమవలమ్బ్య మాయామ్ । ఆస్తే విశుద్ధమవికారమఖణ్డబోధమ్ ఆతప్యమానహృదయేఽవసితం నమామి ॥ ౧౩ ॥
yas tv atra baddha iva karmabhir āvṛtātmā
[yas tv atra baddha iva karmabhir aavritaatmaa]
bhūtendriyāśayamayīm avalambya māyām
[bhootendriyaashayamayeem avalambya maayaam]
āste viśuddham avikāram akhaṇḍa-bodham
[aaste vishuddham avikaaram akhanda-bodham]
ātapyamāna-hṛdaye ’vasitaṁ namāmi
[aatapyamaana-hridaye ’vasitam namaami]
yaḥ — who tu — also atra — here baddhaḥ — bound iva — as if karmabhiḥ — by activities āvṛta — covered ātmā — the pure soul bhūta — the gross elements indriya — the senses āśaya — the mind mayīm — consisting of avalambya — having fallen māyām — into māyā āste — remains viśuddham — completely pure avikāram — without change akhaṇḍa-bodham — possessed of unlimited knowledge ātapyamāna — repentant hṛdaye — in the heart avasitam — residing namāmi — I offer my respectful obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yas tv atra baddha iva karmabhir āvṛtātmā
yaḥ
who
tu
also
atra
here
baddhaḥ
bound
iva
as if
karmabhiḥ
by activities
āvṛta
covered
ātmā
the pure soul
bhūtendriyāśayamayīm avalambya māyām
bhūta
the gross elements
indriya
the senses
āśaya
the mind
mayīm
consisting of
avalambya
having fallen
māyām
into māyā
āste viśuddham avikāram akhaṇḍa-bodham
āste
remains
viśuddham
completely pure
avikāram
without change
akhaṇḍa-bodham
possessed of unlimited knowledge
ātapyamāna-hṛdaye ’vasitaṁ namāmi
ātapyamāna
repentant
hṛdaye
in the heart
avasitam
residing
namāmi
I offer my respectful obeisances.
I, the pure soul, appearing now bound by my activities, am lying in the womb of my mother by the arrangement of māyā. I offer my respectful obeisances unto Him who is also here with me but who is unaffected and changeless. He is unlimited, but He is perceived in the repentant heart. To Him I offer my respectful obeisances.

As stated in the previous verse, the jīva soul says, “I take shelter of the Supreme Lord.” Therefore, constitutionally, the jīva soul is the subordinate servitor of the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead. Both the Supreme Soul and the jīva soul are sitting in the same body, as confirmed in the Upaniṣads. They are sitting as friends, but one is suffering, and the other is aloof from suffering.

In this verse it is said, viśuddham avikāram akhaṇḍa-bodham: the Supersoul is always sitting apart from all contamination. The living entity is contaminated and suffering because he has a material body, but that does not mean that because the Lord is also with him, He also has a material body. He is avikāram, changeless. He is always the same Supreme, but unfortunately the Māyāvādī philosophers, because of their impure hearts, cannot understand that the Supreme Soul, the Supersoul, is different from the individual soul. It is said here, ātapyamāna-hṛdaye ’vasitam: He is in the heart of every living entity, but He can be realized only by a soul who is repentant. The individual soul becomes repentant that he forgot his constitutional position, wanted to become one with the Supreme Soul and tried his best to lord it over material nature. He has been baffled, and therefore he is repentant. At that time, Supersoul, or the relationship between the Supersoul and the individual soul, is realized. As it is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, after many, many births the knowledge comes to the conditioned soul that Vāsudeva is great, He is master, and He is Lord. The individual soul is the servant, and therefore he surrenders unto Him. At that time he becomes a mahātmā, a great soul. Therefore, a fortunate living being who comes to this understanding, even within the womb of his mother, has his liberation assured.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to he who appears to be a soul covered by a material body, bound by karmas, taking support of his material energy consisting of material elements, senses and mind, but who remains pure and unchanging, with indestructible knowledge, and who is perceived by me in my distressed heart. The living entity remembers with astonishment the merciful, amazing pastimes of his Lord. He exists within every suffering body of us sinful jīvas. Why? We do not know if he does this to protect us, or to perform his own pastimes. I offer respects to him. It is fitting that I am here in the womb, bound by karma, experiencing the results of my sinful acts. But why does he stay as the antaryāmī in this stinking hell? He exists there as if bound by karma, though he is not. Because he wanders around Vṛndāvana with his lotus feet, it appears that he has an ātmā covered by a material body like me. But he is not covered. How does he do this? He utilized his own śakti of māyā composed of material elements, senses and mind. “If that is so, then because of using material energy, he would then be contaminated and be subject to change.” No, he is pure and without change, because he has knowledge which cannot be destroyed by māyā like my knowledge (akhaṇḍa-bodham). “How can this be understood by you?” It is perceived in my completely distressed heart. He is distressed thinking, “How can knowledge give by him, situated in my heart, even to a person like me, be destroyed?”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.14

↗
య: పఞ్చభూతరచితే రహిత: శరీరే చ్ఛన్నోఽయథేన్ద్రియగుణార్థచిదాత్మకోఽహమ్ । తేనావికుణ్ఠమహిమానమృషిం తమేనం వన్దే పరం ప్రకృతిపూరుషయో: పుమాంసమ్ ॥ ౧౪ ॥
yaḥ paṣca-bhūta-racite rahitaḥ śarīre
[yah pashcha-bhoota-rachite rahitah shareere]
cchanno ’yathendriya-guṇārtha-cid-ātmako ’ham
[chchanno ’yathendriya-gunaartha-chid-aatmako ’ham]
tenāvikuṇṭha-mahimānam ṛṣiṁ tam enaṁ
[tenaavikuntha-mahimaanam rishim tam enam]
vande paraṁ prakṛti-pūruṣayoḥ pumāṁsam
[vande param prakriti-poorushayoh pumaamsam]
yaḥ — who paṣca-bhūta — five gross elements racite — made of rahitaḥ — separated śarīre — in the material body channaḥ — covered ayathā — unfitly indriya — senses guṇa — qualities artha — objects of senses cit — ego ātmakaḥ — consisting of aham — I tena — by a material body avikuṇṭha-mahimānam — whose glories are unobscured ṛṣim — all-knowing tam — that enam — unto Him vande — I offer obeisances param — transcendental prakṛti — to material nature pūruṣayoḥ — to the living entities pumāṁsam — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ paṣca-bhūta-racite rahitaḥ śarīre
yaḥ
who
paṣca-bhūta
five gross elements
racite
made of
rahitaḥ
separated
śarīre
in the material body
cchanno ’yathendriya-guṇārtha-cid-ātmako ’ham
channaḥ
covered
tenāvikuṇṭha-mahimānam ṛṣiṁ tam enaṁ
vande paraṁ prakṛti-pūruṣayoḥ pumāṁsam
ayathā
unfitly
indriya
senses
guṇa
qualities
artha
objects of senses
cit
ego
ātmakaḥ
consisting of
aham
I
tena
by a material body
avikuṇṭha-mahimānam
whose glories are unobscured
ṛṣim
all-knowing
tam
that
enam
unto Him
vande
I offer obeisances
param
transcendental
prakṛti
to material nature
pūruṣayoḥ
to the living entities
pumāṁsam
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
I am separated from the Supreme Lord because of my being in this material body, which is made of five elements, and therefore my qualities and senses are being misused, although I am essentially spiritual. Because the Supreme Personality of Godhead is transcendental to material nature and the living entities, because He is devoid of such a material body, and because He is always glorious in His spiritual qualities, I offer my obeisances unto Him.

The difference between the living entity and the Supreme Personality of Godhead is that the living entity is prone to be subjected to material nature, whereas the Supreme Godhead is always transcendental to material nature as well as to the living entities. When the living entity is put into material nature, then his senses and qualities are polluted, or designated. There is no possibility for the Supreme Lord to become embodied by material qualities or material senses, for He is above the influence of material nature and cannot possibly be put in the darkness of ignorance like the living entities. Because of His full knowledge, He is never subjected to the influence of material nature. Material nature is always under His control, and it is therefore not possible that material nature can control the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Since the identity of the living entity is very minute, he is prone to be subjected to material nature, but when he is freed from this material body, which is false, he attains the same spiritual nature as the Supreme Lord. At that time there is no qualitative difference between him and the Supreme Lord, but because he is not so quantitatively powerful as to never be put under the influence of material nature, he is quantitatively different from the Lord.

The entire process of devotional service is to purify oneself of this contamination of material nature and put oneself on the spiritual platform, where he is qualitatively one with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the Vedas it is said that the living entity is always free. Asaṅgo hy ayaṁ puruṣaḥ. The living entity is liberated. His material contamination is temporary, and his actual position is that he is liberated. This liberation is achieved by Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which begins from the point of surrender. Therefore it is said here, “I offer my respectful obeisances unto the Supreme Person.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Covered by this body made of the five elements, remaining as a spiritual particle amidst the senses, guṇas, and sense objects, I offer respects to omniscient Kṛṣṇa, superior to prakṛti and Mahāviṣṇu, whose powers are not weakened by these material elements. “If he is like this, how can he stay in this body?” I , as an ātmā, dwelling among senses, material guṇas, and sense objects, though covered by a body, remain situated separately from them. I offer respects to the Lord whose greatness is not at all weakened by these things. Another version has tenāvaguṇṭha-mahimānam: According to Bhāguri, the syllable a with negative meaning has been elided, so the meaning is “his powers are not covered.” (Avaguṇṭha means covered.) I offer respects to Kṛṣṇa, who is superior to prakṛti and to the seer of prakṛti, the puruṣāvatāra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.15

↗
యన్మాయయోరుగుణకర్మనిబన్ధనేఽస్మిన్ సాంసారికే పథి చరంస్తదభిశ్రమేణ । నష్టస్మృతి: పునరయం ప్రవృణీత లోకం యుక్త్యా కయా మహదనుగ్రహమన్తరేణ ॥ ౧౫ ॥
yan-māyayoru-guṇa-karma-nibandhane ’smin
[yan-maayayoru-guna-karma-nibandhane ’smin]
sāṁsārike pathi caraṁs tad-abhiśrameṇa
[saamsaarike pathi charams tad-abhishramena]
naṣṭa-smṛtiḥ punar ayaṁ pravṛṇīta lokaṁ
[nashta-smritih punar ayam pravrineeta lokam]
yuktyā kayā mahad-anugraham antareṇa
[yuktyaa kayaa mahad-anugraham antarena]
yat — of the Lord māyayā — by the māyā uru-guṇa — arising from the great modes karma — activities nibandhane — with bonds asmin — this sāṁsārike — of repeated birth and death pathi — on the path caran — wandering tat — of him abhiśrameṇa — with great pains naṣṭa — lost smṛtiḥ — memory punaḥ — again ayam — this living entity pravṛṇīta — may realize lokam — his true nature yuktyā kayā — by what means mahat-anugraham — the mercy of the Lord antareṇa — without.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yan-māyayoru-guṇa-karma-nibandhane ’smin
yat
of the Lord
māyayā
by the māyā
uru-guṇa
arising from the great modes
karma
activities
nibandhane
with bonds
sāṁsārike pathi caraṁs tad-abhiśrameṇa
naṣṭa-smṛtiḥ punar ayaṁ pravṛṇīta lokaṁ
asmin
this
sāṁsārike
of repeated birth and death
pathi
on the path
caran
wandering
tat
of him
abhiśrameṇa
with great pains
naṣṭa
lost
smṛtiḥ
memory
punaḥ
again
ayam
this living entity
pravṛṇīta
may realize
lokam
his true nature
yuktyā kayā mahad-anugraham antareṇa
yuktyā kayā
by what means
mahat-anugraham
the mercy of the Lord
antareṇa
without.
The human soul further prays: The living entity is put under the influence of material nature and continues a hard struggle for existence on the path of repeated birth and death. This conditional life is due to his forgetfulness of his relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore, without the Lord’s mercy, how can he again engage in the transcendental loving service of the Lord?

The Māyāvādī philosophers say that simply by cultivation of knowledge by mental speculation, one can be liberated from the condition of material bondage. But here it is said one is liberated not by knowledge but by the mercy of the Supreme Lord. The knowledge the conditioned soul gains by mental speculation, however powerful it may be, is always too imperfect to approach the Absolute Truth. It is said that without the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead one cannot understand Him or His actual form, quality and name. Those who are not in devotional service go on speculating for many, many thousands of years, but they are still unable to understand the nature of the Absolute Truth.

One can be liberated in the knowledge of the Absolute Truth simply by the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is clearly said herein that our memory is lost because we are now covered by His material energy. Arguments may be put forward as to why we have been put under the influence of this material energy by the supreme will of the Lord. This is explained in Bhagavad-gītā, where the Lord says, “I am sitting in everyone’s heart, and due to Me one is forgetful or one is alive in knowledge.” The forgetfulness of the conditioned soul is also due to the direction of the Supreme Lord. A living entity misuses his little independence when he wants to lord it over material nature. This misuse of independence, which is called māyā, is always available, otherwise there would be no independence. Independence implies that one can use it properly or improperly. It is not static; it is dynamic. Therefore, misuse of independence is the cause of being influenced by māyā.

Māyā is so strong that the Lord says that it is very difficult to surmount her influence. But one can do so very easily “if he surrenders unto Me.” Mām eva ye prapadyante: anyone who surrenders unto Him can overcome the influence of the stringent laws of material nature. It is clearly said here that a living entity is put under the influence of māyā by His will, and if anyone wants to get out of this entanglement, this can be made possible simply by His mercy.

The activities of the conditioned souls under the influence of material nature are explained here. Every conditioned soul is engaged in different types of work under the influence of material nature. We can see in the material world that the conditioned soul acts so powerfully that he is playing wonderfully in creating the so-called advancements of material civilization for sense gratification. But actually his position is to know that he is an eternal servant of the Supreme Lord. When he is actually in perfect knowledge, he knows that the Lord is the supreme worshipful object and that the living entity is His eternal servant. Without this knowledge, he engages in material activities; that is called ignorance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A person repeatedly loses his memory because of fatigue as he treads the path of birth and death bound by the Lord’s powerful karma produced from the guṇas. How can he choose the abode of the Lord without the mercy of the devotees? “How did you attain this bhakti?” The cause of attaining bhakti is the mercy of great souls. By what means can a person like me (ayam) who has lost remembrance because of fatigue in traveling on the path choose the abode of the Lord (lokam) without the mercy of the great devotees? Pravṛṇīta means “choose as one cherished goal.” There is no other means except this. My worship of Kṛṣṇa has appeared only by the mercy of some Kṛṣṇa devotee guru I had in a previous life.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.16

↗
జ్ఞానం యదేతదదధాత్కతమ: స దేవస్ త్రైకాలికం స్థిరచరేష్వనువర్తితాంశ: । తం జీవకర్మపదవీమనువర్తమానాస్ తాపత్రయోపశమనాయ వయం భజేమ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
jṣānaṁ yad etad adadhāt katamaḥ sa devas
[jshaanam yad etad adadhaat katamah sa devas]
trai-kālikaṁ sthira-careṣv anuvartitāṁśaḥ
[trai-kaalikam sthira-chareshv anuvartitaamshah]
taṁ jīva-karma-padavīm anuvartamānās
[tam jeeva-karma-padaveem anuvartamaanaas]
tāpa-trayopaśamanāya vayaṁ bhajema
[taapa-trayopashamanaaya vayam bhajema]
jṣānam — knowledge yat — which etat — this adadhāt — gave katamaḥ — who other than saḥ — that devaḥ — the Personality of Godhead trai-kālikam — of the three phases of time sthira-careṣu — in the inanimate and animate objects anuvartita — dwelling aṁśaḥ — His partial representation tam — unto Him jīva — of the jīva souls karma-padavīm — the path of fruitive activities anuvartamānāḥ — who are pursuing tāpa-traya — from the threefold miseries upaśamanāya — for getting free vayam — we bhajema — must surrender.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jṣānaṁ yad etad adadhāt katamaḥ sa devas
jṣānam
knowledge
yat
which
etat
this
adadhāt
gave
katamaḥ
who other than
saḥ
that
devaḥ
the Personality of Godhead
trai-kālikaṁ sthira-careṣv anuvartitāṁśaḥ
trai-kālikam
of the three phases of time
sthira-careṣu
in the inanimate and animate objects
anuvartita
dwelling
aṁśaḥ
His partial representation
taṁ jīva-karma-padavīm anuvartamānās
tam
unto Him
jīva
of the jīva souls
karma-padavīm
the path of fruitive activities
anuvartamānāḥ
who are pursuing
tāpa-trayopaśamanāya vayaṁ bhajema
tāpa-traya
from the threefold miseries
upaśamanāya
for getting free
vayam
we
bhajema
must surrender.
No one other than the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as the localized Paramātmā, the partial representation of the Lord, is directing all inanimate and animate objects. He is present in the three phases of time — past, present and future. Therefore, the conditioned soul is engaged in different activities by His direction, and in order to get free from the threefold miseries of this conditional life, we have to surrender unto Him only.

When a conditioned soul is seriously anxious to get out of the influence of the material clutches, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is situated within him as Paramātmā, gives him this knowledge: “Surrender unto Me.” As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā, “Give up all other engagements. Just surrender unto Me.” It is to be accepted that the source of knowledge is the Supreme Person. This is also confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā. Mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca. The Lord says, “Through Me one gets real knowledge and memory, and one also forgets through Me.” To one who wants to be materially satisfied or who wants to lord it over material nature, the Lord gives the opportunity to forget His service and engage in the so-called happiness of material activities. Similarly, when one is frustrated in lording it over material nature and is very serious about getting out of this material entanglement, the Lord, from within, gives him the knowledge that he has to surrender unto Him; then there is liberation.

This knowledge cannot be imparted by anyone other than the Supreme Lord or His representative. In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta Lord Caitanya instructs Rūpa Gosvāmī that the living entities wander in life after life, undergoing the miserable conditions of material existence. But when one is very anxious to get free from the material entanglement, he gets enlightenment through a spiritual master and Kṛṣṇa. This means that Kṛṣṇa as the Supersoul is seated within the heart of the living entity, and when the living entity is serious, the Lord directs him to take shelter of His representative, a bona fide spiritual master. Directed from within and guided externally by the spiritual master, one attains the path of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which is the way out of the material clutches.

Therefore there is no possibility of one’s being situated in his own position unless he is blessed by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Unless he is enlightened with the supreme knowledge, one has to undergo the severe penalties of the hard struggle for existence in the material nature. The spiritual master is therefore the mercy manifestation of the Supreme Person. The conditioned soul has to take direct instruction from the spiritual master, and thus he gradually becomes enlightened to the path of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The seed of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is sown within the heart of the conditioned soul, and when one hears instruction from the spiritual master, the seed fructifies, and one’s life is blessed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Who else other than the expansion of the Lord residing in all beings through all phases of time can give knowledge? We, treading the path of karmas for the jīva, should worship the Lord in order to destroy the three miseries. “With what proof do you worship this Supreme Lord?” By inference we can understand his presence. Which devatā offers knowledge to a fool like me? Among the devatās,one should be chief. He must be inferred as there is no other reason for my knowledge. His aṁśa, antaryāmī, dwells in all beings in past, present and future. We tread the path of karmas of the jīva (karma-padavīm).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.17

↗
దేహ్యన్యదేహవివరే జఠరాగ్నినాసృగ్- విణ్మూత్రకూపపతితో భృశతప్తదేహ: । ఇచ్ఛన్నితో వివసితుం గణయన్స్వమాసాన్ నిర్వాస్యతే కృపణధీర్భగవన్కదా ను ॥ ౧౭ ॥
dehy anya-deha-vivare jaṭharāgnināsṛg-
[dehy anya-deha-vivare jatharaagninaasrig-]
viṇ-mūtra-kūpa-patito bhṛśa-tapta-dehaḥ
[vin-mootra-koopa-patito bhrisha-tapta-dehah]
icchann ito vivasituṁ gaṇayan sva-māsān
[ichchann ito vivasitum ganayan sva-maasaan]
nirvāsyate kṛpaṇa-dhīr bhagavan kadā nu
[nirvaasyate kripana-dheer bhagavan kadaa nu]
dehī — the embodied soul anya-deha — of another body vivare — in the abdomen jaṭhara — of the stomach agninā — by the fire asṛk — of blood viṭ — stool mūtra — and urine kūpa — in a pool patitaḥ — fallen bhṛśa — strongly tapta — scorched dehaḥ — his body icchan — desiring itaḥ — from that place vivasitum — to get out gaṇayan — counting svamāsān — his months nirvāsyate — will be released kṛpaṇa-dhīḥ — person of miserly intelligence bhagavan — O Lord kadā — when nu — indeed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dehy anya-deha-vivare jaṭharāgnināsṛg-
dehī
the embodied soul
anya-deha
of another body
vivare
in the abdomen
jaṭhara
of the stomach
agninā
by the fire
asṛk
of blood
viṇ-mūtra-kūpa-patito bhṛśa-tapta-dehaḥ
viṭ
stool
mūtra
and urine
kūpa
in a pool
patitaḥ
fallen
bhṛśa
strongly
tapta
scorched
dehaḥ
his body
icchann ito vivasituṁ gaṇayan sva-māsān
icchan
desiring
itaḥ
from that place
vivasitum
to get out
gaṇayan
counting
svamāsān
his months
nirvāsyate kṛpaṇa-dhīr bhagavan kadā nu
nirvāsyate
will be released
kṛpaṇa-dhīḥ
person of miserly intelligence
bhagavan
O Lord
kadā
when
nu
indeed.
Fallen into a pool of blood, stool and urine within the abdomen of his mother, his own body scorched by the mother’s gastric fire, the embodied soul, anxious to get out, counts his months and prays, “O my Lord, when shall I, a wretched soul, be released from this confinement?”

The precarious condition of the living entity within the womb of his mother is described here. On one side of where the child is floating is the heat of gastric fire, and on the other side are urine, stool, blood and discharges. After seven months the child, who has regained his consciousness, feels the horrible condition of his existence and prays to the Lord. Counting the months until his release, he becomes greatly anxious to get out of the confinement. The so-called civilized man does not take account of this horrible condition of life, and sometimes, for the purpose of sense gratification, he tries to kill the child by methods of contraception or abortion. Unserious about the horrible condition in the womb, such persons continue in materialism, grossly misusing the chance of the human form of life.

The word kṛpaṇa-dhīḥ is significant in this verse. Dhī means “intelligence,” and kṛpaṇa means “miserly.” Conditional life is for persons who are of miserly intelligence or who do not properly utilize their intelligence. In the human form of life the intelligence is developed, and one has to utilize that developed intelligence to get out of the cycle of birth and death. One who does not do so is a miser, just like a person who has immense wealth but does not utilize it, keeping it simply to see. A person who does not actually utilize his human intelligence to get out of the clutches of māyā, the cycle of birth and death, is accepted as miserly. The exact opposite of miserly is udāra, “very magnanimous.” A brāhmaṇa is called udāra because he utilizes his human intelligence for spiritual realization. He uses that intelligence to preach Kṛṣṇa consciousness for the benefit of the public, and therefore he is magnanimous.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The foolish jīva, situated in the body, within the body of his mother, his body suffering greatly, trapped in the hole filled with stool, urine, blood and the digestive fire, desiring to get out, counts the months. “O Lord! When will I get out of this place?” O Lord! My happiness and distress, and attaining your lotus feet are all dependent on you. What can I ask for, since I am so childish and young? In this way he speaks to the Lord. I, situated in this body (dehi), am situated within another body, that of my mother, desiring to be free (vivasitum) from this (itaḥ), counting my months. “This is the eighth month, this is the ninth month, this is the tenth month.” I have no intelligence (kṛpaṇa-dhīḥ), since my happiness and distress have been given by my fate (caused by myself). When will I get out of this place? Because the difficulties cannot be tolerated within the womb, I will worship you outside.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.18

↗
యేనేద‍ృశీం గతిమసౌ దశమాస్య ఈశ సంగ్రాహిత: పురుదయేన భవాద‍ృశేన । స్వేనైవ తుష్యతు కృతేన స దీననాథ: కో నామ తత్ప్రతి వినాఞ్జలిమస్య కుర్యాత్ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
yenedṛśīṁ gatim asau daśa-māsya īśa
[yenedrisheem gatim asau dasha-maasya eesha]
saṅgrāhitaḥ puru-dayena bhavādṛśena
[sangraahitah puru-dayena bhavaadrishena]
svenaiva tuṣyatu kṛtena sa dīna-nāthaḥ
[svenaiva tushyatu kritena sa deena-naathah]
ko nāma tat-prati vināṣjalim asya kuryāt
[ko naama tat-prati vinaashjalim asya kuryaat]
yena — by whom (the Lord) īdṛśīm — such gatim — a condition asau — that person (myself) daśa-māsyaḥ — ten months old īśa — O Lord saṅgrāhitaḥ — was made to accept puru-dayena — very merciful bhavādṛśena — incomparable svena — own eva — alone tuṣyatu — may He be pleased kṛtena — with His act saḥ — that dīna-nāthaḥ — refuge of the fallen souls kaḥ — who nāma — indeed tat — that mercy prati — in return vinā — except with aṣjalim — folded hands asya — of the Lord kuryāt — can repay.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yenedṛśīṁ gatim asau daśa-māsya īśa
yena
by whom (the Lord)
īdṛśīm
such
gatim
a condition
asau
that person (myself)
daśa-māsyaḥ
ten months old
īśa
O Lord
saṅgrāhitaḥ puru-dayena bhavādṛśena
saṅgrāhitaḥ
was made to accept
puru-dayena
very merciful
bhavādṛśena
incomparable
svenaiva tuṣyatu kṛtena sa dīna-nāthaḥ
svena
own
eva
alone
tuṣyatu
may He be pleased
kṛtena
with His act
saḥ
that
dīna-nāthaḥ
refuge of the fallen souls
kaḥ
who
nāma
indeed
ko nāma tat-prati vināṣjalim asya kuryāt
tat
that mercy
prati
in return
vinā
except with
aṣjalim
folded hands
asya
of the Lord
kuryāt
can repay.
My dear Lord, by Your causeless mercy I am awakened to consciousness, although I am only ten months old. For this causeless mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the friend of all fallen souls, there is no way to express my gratitude but to pray with folded hands.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, intelligence and forgetfulness are both supplied by the Supersoul sitting with the individual soul within the body. When He sees that a conditioned soul is very serious about getting out of the clutches of the material influence, the Supreme Lord gives intelligence internally as Supersoul and externally as the spiritual master, or, as an incarnation of the Personality of Godhead Himself, He helps by speaking instructions such as Bhagavad-gītā. The Lord is always seeking the opportunity to reclaim the fallen souls to His abode, the kingdom of God. We should always feel very much obliged to the Personality of Godhead, for He is always anxious to bring us into the happy condition of eternal life. There is no sufficient means to repay the Personality of Godhead for His act of benediction; therefore, we can simply feel gratitude and pray to the Lord with folded hands. This prayer of the child in the womb may be questioned by some atheistic people. How can a child pray in such a nice way in the womb of his mother? Everything is possible by the grace of the Lord. The child is put into such a precarious condition externally, but internally he is the same, and the Lord is there. By the transcendental energy of the Lord, everything is possible.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! I have received the rare blessing of being a devotee in the womb for ten months by great mercy that can be given by you alone. You, the saviour of those suffering, should be satisfied with your actions. Who can repay your mercy, except by folding his hands in thanks? “You have asked me, ‘When will I get out?’ Are you suggesting that I am merciless since I do not get you out right now?” With shame, fear, biting his tongue, putting himself in a humble position, the jīva speaks. I, situated in this womb for ten months, have received this situation of being your devotee, rare even for devatās, by mercy which can come from no one except you (bhavādṛśena). Such a nature is impossible for me to attain even in a life time of Brahmā. May you be satisfied by your actions! Who can compensate for that mercy? I can only fold my hands.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.19

↗
పశ్యత్యయం ధిషణయా నను సప్తవధ్రి: శారీరకే దమశరీర్యపర: స్వదేహే । యత్సృష్టయాసం తమహం పురుషం పురాణం పశ్యే బహిర్హృది చ చైత్యమివ ప్రతీతమ్ ॥ ౧౯ ॥
paśyaty ayaṁ dhiṣaṇayā nanu sapta-vadhriḥ
[pashyaty ayam dhishanayaa nanu sapta-vadhrih]
śārīrake dama-śarīry aparaḥ sva-dehe
[shaareerake dama-shareery aparah sva-dehe]
yat-sṛṣṭayāsaṁ tam ahaṁ puruṣaṁ purāṇaṁ
[yat-srishtayaasam tam aham purusham puraanam]
paśye bahir hṛdi ca caityam iva pratītam
[pashye bahir hridi cha chaityam iva prateetam]
paśyati — sees ayam — this living entity dhiṣaṇayā — with intelligence nanu — only sapta-vadhriḥ — bound by the seven layers of material coverings śārīrake — agreeable and disagreeable sense perceptions dama-śarīrī — having a body for self-control aparaḥ — another sva-dehe — in his body yat — by the Supreme Lord sṛṣṭayā — endowed āsam — was tam — Him aham — I puruṣam — person purāṇam — oldest paśye — see bahiḥ — outside hṛdi — in the heart ca — and caityam — the source of the ego iva — indeed pratītam — recognized.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paśyaty ayaṁ dhiṣaṇayā nanu sapta-vadhriḥ
paśyati
sees
ayam
this living entity
dhiṣaṇayā
with intelligence
nanu
only
sapta-vadhriḥ
bound by the seven layers of material coverings
śārīrake dama-śarīry aparaḥ sva-dehe
śārīrake
agreeable and disagreeable sense perceptions
dama-śarīrī
having a body for self-control
aparaḥ
another
sva-dehe
in his body
yat-sṛṣṭayāsaṁ tam ahaṁ puruṣaṁ purāṇaṁ
yat
by the Supreme Lord
sṛṣṭayā
endowed
āsam
was
tam
Him
aham
I
puruṣam
person
purāṇam
oldest
paśye bahir hṛdi ca caityam iva pratītam
paśye
see
bahiḥ
outside
hṛdi
in the heart
ca
and
caityam
the source of the ego
iva
indeed
pratītam
recognized.
The living entity in another type of body sees only by instinct; he knows only the agreeable and disagreeable sense perceptions of that particular body. But I have a body in which I can control my senses and can understand my destination; therefore, I offer my respectful obeisances to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, by whom I have been blessed with this body and by whose grace I can see Him within and without.

The evolutionary process of different types of bodies is something like that of a fructifying flower. Just as there are different stages in the growth of a flower — the bud stage, the blooming stage and the full-fledged, grown-up stage of aroma and beauty — similarly, there are 8,400,000 species of bodies in gradual evolution, and there is systematic progress from the lower species of life to the higher. The human form of life is supposed to be the highest, for it offers consciousness for getting out of the clutches of birth and death. The fortunate child in the womb of his mother realizes his superior position and is thereby distinguished from other bodies. Animals in bodies lower than that of the human being are conscious only as far as their bodily distress and happiness are concerned; they cannot think of more than their bodily necessities of life-eating, sleeping, mating and defending. But in the human form of life, by the grace of God, the consciousness is so developed that a man can evaluate his exceptional position and thus realize the self and the Supreme Lord.

The word dama-śarīrī means that we have a body in which we can control the senses and the mind. The complication of materialistic life is due to an uncontrolled mind and uncontrolled senses. One should feel grateful to the Supreme Personality of Godhead for having obtained such a nice human form of body, and one should properly utilize it. The distinction between an animal and a man is that the animal cannot control himself and has no sense of decency, whereas the human being has the sense of decency and can control himself. If this controlling power is not exhibited by the human being, then he is no better than an animal. By controlling the senses, or by the process of yoga regulation, one can understand the position of his self, the Supersoul, the world and their interrelation; everything is possible by controlling the senses. Otherwise, we are no better than animals.

Real self-realization by means of controlling the senses is explained herein. One should try to see the Supreme Personality of Godhead and one’s own self also. To think oneself the same as the Supreme is not self-realization. Here it is clearly explained that the Supreme Lord is anādi, or purāṇa, and He has no other cause. The living entity is born of the Supreme Godhead as part and parcel. It is confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā, anādir ādir govindaḥ: Govinda, the Supreme Person, has no cause. He is unborn. But the living entity is born of Him. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, mamaivāṁśaḥ: both the living entity and the Supreme Lord are unborn, but it has to be understood that the supreme cause of the part and parcel is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Brahma-saṁhitā therefore says that everything has come from the Supreme Personality of Godhead ( sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam ). The Vedānta-sūtra confirms this also. Janmādy asya yataḥ: the Absolute Truth is the original source of everyone’s birth. Kṛṣṇa also says in Bhagavad-gītā, ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ: “I am the source of birth of everything, including Brahmā and Lord Śiva and the living entities.” This is self-realization. One should know that he is under the control of the Supreme Lord and not think that he is fully independent. Otherwise, why should he be put into conditional life?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some jṣānī in control of his senses, surrounded by the seven dhātus, sees with his intelligence the happiness and distress caused by his body. But I see the Supreme Lord who has given that intelligence, perceived externally and internally, who is the controller of citta. Thinking of the Lord’s great mercy to him, he gives more details. Having attained the human form (ayam), the jīva surrounded by the body of seven dhātus, sees with intelligence the bodily situations of happiness and distress. This means that some fortunate soul, situated in his body, becomes a jṣānī (dama-śarīrī). But I, though most sinful, see, by intelligence given by the Lord (yat-sṛṣtayā), the Supreme Lord, the presiding deity of citta (caityam), [Note: This is Vāsudeva.]or the Lord to be served by the citta (consciousness), who is obtained (pratītam) externally as the deity and in the heart by realization. It has already been shown (verse 11 commentary) that different jīvas experience differently at this time.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.20

↗
సోఽహం వసన్నపి విభో బహుదు:ఖవాసం గర్భాన్న నిర్జిగమిషే బహిరన్ధకూపే । యత్రోపయాతముపసర్పతి దేవమాయా మిథ్యా మతిర్యదను సంసృతిచక్రమేతత్ ॥ ౨౦ ॥
so ’haṁ vasann api vibho bahu-duḥkha-vāsaṁ
[so ’ham vasann api vibho bahu-duhkha-vaasam]
garbhān na nirjigamiṣe bahir andha-kūpe
[garbhaan na nirjigamishe bahir andha-koope]
yatropayātam upasarpati deva-māyā
[yatropayaatam upasarpati deva-maayaa]
mithyā matir yad-anu saṁsṛti-cakram etat
[mithyaa matir yad-anu samsriti-chakram etat]
saḥ aham — I myself vasan — living api — although vibho — O Lord bahu-duḥkha — with many miseries vāsam — in a condition garbhāt — from the abdomen na — not nirjigamiṣe — I wish to depart bahiḥ — outside andha-kūpe — in the blind well yatra — where upayātam — one who goes there upasarpati — she captures deva-māyā — the external energy of the Lord mithyā — false matiḥ — identification yat — which māyā anu — according to saṁsṛti — of continual birth and death cakram — cycle etat — this.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’haṁ vasann api vibho bahu-duḥkha-vāsaṁ
saḥ aham
I myself
vasan
living
api
although
vibho
O Lord
garbhān na nirjigamiṣe bahir andha-kūpe
bahu-duḥkha
with many miseries
yatropayātam upasarpati deva-māyā
vāsam
in a condition
garbhāt
from the abdomen
na
not
nirjigamiṣe
I wish to depart
bahiḥ
outside
mithyā matir yad-anu saṁsṛti-cakram etat
andha-kūpe
in the blind well
yatra
where
upayātam
one who goes there
upasarpati
she captures
deva-māyā
the external energy of the Lord
mithyā
false
matiḥ
identification
yat
which māyā
anu
according to
saṁsṛti
of continual birth and death
cakram
cycle
etat
this.
Therefore, my Lord, although I am living in a terrible condition, I do not wish to depart from my mother’s abdomen to fall again into the blind well of materialistic life. Your external energy, called deva-māyā, at once captures the newly born child, and immediately false identification, which is the beginning of the cycle of continual birth and death, begins.

As long as the child is within the womb of his mother, he is in a very precarious and horrible condition of life, but the benefit is that he revives pure consciousness of his relationship with the Supreme Lord and prays for deliverance. But once he is outside the abdomen, when a child is born, māyā, or the illusory energy, is so strong that he is immediately overpowered into considering his body to be his self. Māyā means “illusion,” or that which is actually not. In the material world, everyone is identifying with his body. This false egoistic consciousness of “I am this body” at once develops after the child comes out of the womb. The mother and other relatives are awaiting the child, and as soon as he is born, the mother feeds him and everyone takes care of him. The living entity soon forgets his position and becomes entangled in bodily relationships. The entire material existence is entanglement in this bodily conception of life. Real knowledge means to develop the consciousness of “I am not this body. I am spirit soul, an eternal part and parcel of the Supreme Lord.” Real knowledge entails renunciation, or nonacceptance of this body as the self.

By the influence of māyā, the external energy, one forgets everything just after birth. Therefore the child is praying that he prefers to remain within the womb rather than come out. It is said that Śukadeva Gosvāmī, on this consideration, remained for sixteen years within the womb of his mother; he did not want to be entangled in false bodily identification. After cultivating such knowledge within the womb of his mother, he came out at the end of sixteen years and immediately left home so that he might not be captured by the influence of māyā. The influence of māyā is also explained in Bhagavad-gītā as insurmountable. But insurmountable māyā can be overcome simply by Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is also confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (7.14) : mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te. Whoever surrenders unto the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa can get out of this false conception of life. By the influence of māyā only, one forgets his eternal relationship with Kṛṣṇa and identifies himself with his body and the by-products of the body — namely wife, children, society, friendship and love. Thus he becomes a victim of the influence of māyā, and his materialistic life of continued birth and death becomes still more stringent.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! Though living in a place of suffering, I do not wish to go out of the womb to the blind well, where the Lord’s māyā pervades all those who have gone there, and give them a false identity and continual birth. “You choose me by bhakti, but you are agitated by suffering. Because you requested to get out, now I will take you out of the womb.” “No, don’ṭ do that! I don’t what to get into a condition of suffering in the outside world!” In that place the Lord’s (deva) māyā pervades (upasarpati) all beings who have gone outside the womb (upayātam). By her, the false conception of “I am the body” (mithyā matiḥ) and repeated birth takes place.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.21

↗
తస్మాదహం విగతవిక్లవ ఉద్ధరిష్య ఆత్మానమాశు తమస: సుహృదాత్మనైవ । భూయో యథా వ్యసనమేతదనేకరన్ధ్రం మా మే భవిష్యదుపసాదితవిష్ణుపాద: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
tasmād ahaṁ vigata-viklava uddhariṣya
[tasmaad aham vigata-viklava uddharishya]
ātmānam āśu tamasaḥ suhṛdātmanaiva
[aatmaanam aashu tamasah suhridaatmanaiva]
bhūyo yathā vyasanam etad aneka-randhraṁ
[bhooyo yathaa vyasanam etad aneka-randhram]
mā me bhaviṣyad upasādita-viṣṇu-pādaḥ
[maa me bhavishyad upasaadita-vishnu-paadah]
tasmāt — therefore aham — I vigata — ceased viklavaḥ — agitation uddhariṣye — shall deliver ātmānam — myself āśu — quickly tamasaḥ — from the darkness suhṛdā ātmanā — with friendly intelligence eva — indeed bhūyaḥ — again yathā — so that vyasanam — plight etat — this aneka-randhram — entering many wombs mā — not me — my bhaviṣyat — may occur upasādita — placed (in my mind) viṣṇu-pādaḥ — the lotus feet of Lord Viṣṇu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmād ahaṁ vigata-viklava uddhariṣya
tasmāt
therefore
aham
I
vigata
ceased
viklavaḥ
agitation
uddhariṣye
shall deliver
ātmānam āśu tamasaḥ suhṛdātmanaiva
ātmānam
myself
āśu
quickly
tamasaḥ
from the darkness
suhṛdā ātmanā
with friendly intelligence
eva
indeed
bhūyo yathā vyasanam etad aneka-randhraṁ
bhūyaḥ
again
yathā
so that
vyasanam
plight
etat
this
aneka-randhram
entering many wombs
mā me bhaviṣyad upasādita-viṣṇu-pādaḥ
mā
not
me
my
bhaviṣyat
may occur
upasādita
placed (in my mind)
viṣṇu-pādaḥ
the lotus feet of Lord Viṣṇu.
Therefore, without being agitated any more, I shall deliver myself from the darkness of nescience with the help of my friend, clear consciousness. Simply by keeping the lotus feet of Lord Viṣṇu in my mind, I shall be saved from entering into the wombs of many mothers for repeated birth and death.

The miseries of material existence begin from the very day when the spirit soul takes shelter in the ovum and sperm of the mother and father, they continue after he is born from the womb, and then they are further prolonged. We do not know where the suffering ends. It does not end, however, by one’s changing his body. The change of body is taking place at every moment, but that does not mean that we are improving from the fetal condition of life to a more comfortable condition. The best thing, therefore, is to develop Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Here it is stated, upasādita-viṣṇu-pādaḥ. This means realization of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. One who is intelligent, by the grace of the Lord, and develops Kṛṣṇa consciousness, is successful in his life because simply by keeping himself in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he will be saved from the repetition of birth and death.

The child prays that it is better to remain within the womb of darkness and be constantly absorbed in Kṛṣṇa consciousness than to get out and again fall a victim to the illusory energy. The illusory energy acts within the abdomen as well as outside the abdomen, but the trick is that one should remain Kṛṣṇa conscious, and then the effect of such a horrible condition cannot act unfavorably upon him. In Bhagavad-gītā it is said that one’s intelligence is his friend, and the same intelligence can also be his enemy. Here also the same idea is repeated: suhṛdātmanaiva, friendly intelligence. Absorption of intelligence in the personal service of Kṛṣṇa and full consciousness of Kṛṣṇa always are the path of self-realization and liberation. Without being unnecessarily agitated, if we take to the process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness by constantly chanting Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare, the cycle of birth and death can be stopped for good.

It may be questioned herein how the child can be fully Kṛṣṇa conscious within the womb of the mother without any paraphernalia with which to execute Kṛṣṇa consciousness. It is not necessary to arrange for paraphernalia to worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. The child wants to remain within the abdomen of its mother and at the same time wants to become free from the clutches of māyā. One does not need any material arrangement to cultivate Kṛṣṇa consciousness. One can cultivate Kṛṣṇa consciousness anywhere and everywhere, provided he can always think of Kṛṣṇa. The mahā-mantra, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare, can be chanted even within the abdomen of one’s mother. One can chant while sleeping, while working, while imprisoned in the womb or while outside. This Kṛṣṇa consciousness cannot be checked in any circumstance. The conclusion of the child’s prayer is: “Let me remain in this condition; although it is very miserable, it is better not to fall a victim to māyā again by going outside.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore, having destroyed suffering here, I will deliver myself quickly from saṁsāra by my friend the intelligence, given by you, so that I, having surrendered to your lotus feet, will not again have the misfortune of a material body. “So, what have you decided?” Even in the womb, I have given up suffering. I will deliver myself from saṁsāra (tamasaḥ) by my friend intelligence, the chariot driver, which has been given by you, so that I will not in the future have the misfortune of again having a body of nine gates (aneka-randhram). Where will you get the ingredients for this practice? I have taken shelter (upasādita) of your lotus feet with remembering and chanting.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.22

↗
కపిల ఉవాచ ఏవం కృతమతిర్గర్భే దశమాస్య: స్తువన్నృషి: । సద్య: క్షిపత్యవాచీనం ప్రసూత్యై సూతిమారుత: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
kapila uvāca
[kapila uvaacha]
evaṁ kṛta-matir garbhe
[evam krita-matir garbhe]
daśa-māsyaḥ stuvann ṛṣiḥ
[dasha-maasyah stuvann rishih]
sadyaḥ kṣipaty avācīnaṁ
[sadyah kshipaty avaacheenam]
prasūtyai sūti-mārutaḥ
[prasootyai sooti-maarutah]
kapilaḥ uvāca — Lord Kapila said evam — thus kṛta-matiḥ — desiring garbhe — in the womb daśa-māsyaḥ — ten-month-old stuvan — extolling ṛṣiḥ — the living entity sadyaḥ — at that very time kṣipati — propels avācīnam — turned downward prasūtyai — for birth sūti-mārutaḥ — the wind for childbirth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kapila uvāca
kapilaḥ uvāca
Lord Kapila said
evaṁ kṛta-matir garbhe
evam
thus
kṛta-matiḥ
desiring
garbhe
in the womb
daśa-māsyaḥ stuvann ṛṣiḥ
daśa-māsyaḥ
ten-month-old
stuvan
extolling
ṛṣiḥ
the living entity
sadyaḥ kṣipaty avācīnaṁ
sadyaḥ
at that very time
kṣipati
propels
avācīnam
turned downward
prasūtyai sūti-mārutaḥ
prasūtyai
for birth
sūti-mārutaḥ
the wind for childbirth.
Lord Kapila continued: The ten-month-old living entity has these desires even while in the womb. But while he thus extols the Lord, the wind that helps parturition propels him forth with his face turned downward so that he may be born.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kapila said: Deciding in this way in the womb at ten months, the wise jīva praises the Lord. However, the air causing childbirth suddenly moves the foolish jīva eager to enter the world in order for it take birth. Deciding in this way that he will worship Kṛṣṇa, living in the womb, praising the Lord, he becomes wise (ṛṣiḥ). He will not come into this world and again suffering saṁsāra. Now hear the misfortunate condition of the afflicted jīva described in the previous chapter. The air causing birth (sūti-mārutaḥ) quickly moves the body about to enter saṁsāra (arvācinam) in order for birth to take places during the tenth month. It is understood from this that he who is wise (ṛṣiḥ) comes out of the womb without the movements of the birth air. If one desires to explain this verse in terms of one jīva, then it can mean “The wise jīva, having determination, praises the Lord, but the birth air pushes him out.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.23

↗
తేనావసృష్ట: సహసా కృత్వావాక్శిర ఆతుర: । వినిష్క్రామతి కృచ్ఛ్రేణ నిరుచ్ఛ్‌వాసో హతస్మృతి: ॥ ౨౩ ॥
tenāvasṛṣṭaḥ sahasā
[tenaavasrishtah sahasaa]
kṛtvāvāk śira āturaḥ
[kritvaavaak shira aaturah]
viniṣkrāmati kṛcchreṇa
[vinishkraamati krichchrena]
nirucchvāso hata-smṛtiḥ
[niruchchvaaso hata-smritih]
tena — by that wind avasṛṣṭaḥ — pushed downward sahasā — suddenly kṛtvā — turned avāk — downward śiraḥ — his head āturaḥ — suffering viniṣkrāmati — he comes out kṛcchreṇa — with great trouble nirucchvāsaḥ — breathless hata — deprived of smṛtiḥ — memory.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tenāvasṛṣṭaḥ sahasā
tena
by that wind
avasṛṣṭaḥ
pushed downward
sahasā
suddenly
kṛtvāvāk śira āturaḥ
kṛtvā
turned
avāk
downward
śiraḥ
his head
āturaḥ
suffering
viniṣkrāmati kṛcchreṇa
viniṣkrāmati
he comes out
kṛcchreṇa
with great trouble
nirucchvāso hata-smṛtiḥ
nirucchvāsaḥ
breathless
hata
deprived of
smṛtiḥ
memory.
Pushed downward all of a sudden by the wind, the child comes out with great trouble, head downward, breathless and deprived of memory due to severe agony.

The word kṛcchreṇa means “with great difficulty.” When the child comes out of the abdomen through the narrow passage, due to pressure there the breathing system completely stops, and due to agony the child loses his memory. Sometimes the trouble is so severe that the child comes out dead or almost dead. One can imagine what the pangs of birth are like. The child remains for ten months in that horrible condition within the abdomen, and at the end of ten months he is forcibly pushed out. In Bhagavad-gītā the Lord points out that a person who is serious about advancement in spiritual consciousness should always consider the four pangs of birth, death, disease and old age. The materialist advances in many ways, but he is unable to stop these four principles of suffering inherent in material existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Pushed strongly by the birth air with head down, in pain, he emerges with difficulty, without breathing, and without memory of his previous births. Hatā smṛtiḥ means the he cannot remember his previous births, that he had previously died and been born.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.24

↗
పతితో భువ్యసృఙ్‌మిశ్ర: విష్ఠాభూరివ చేష్టతే । రోరూయతి గతే జ్ఞానే విపరీతాం గతిం గత: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
patito bhuvy asṛṅ-miśraḥ
[patito bhuvy asrin-mishrah]
viṣṭhā-bhūr iva ceṣṭate
[vishthaa-bhoor iva cheshtate]
rorūyati gate jṣāne
[rorooyati gate jshaane]
viparītāṁ gatiṁ gataḥ
[vipareetaam gatim gatah]
patitaḥ — fallen bhuvi — on the earth asṛk — with blood miśraḥ — smeared viṣṭhā-bhūḥ — a worm iva — like ceṣṭate — he moves his limbs rorūyati — cries loudly gate — being lost jṣāne — his wisdom viparītām — the opposite gatim — state gataḥ — gone to.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
patito bhuvy asṛṅ-miśraḥ
patitaḥ
fallen
bhuvi
on the earth
asṛk
with blood
miśraḥ
smeared
viṣṭhā-bhūr iva ceṣṭate
viṣṭhā-bhūḥ
a worm
iva
like
ceṣṭate
he moves his limbs
rorūyati gate jṣāne
rorūyati
cries loudly
gate
being lost
jṣāne
his wisdom
viparītāṁ gatiṁ gataḥ
viparītām
the opposite
gatim
state
gataḥ
gone to.
The child thus falls on the ground, smeared with stool and blood, and plays just like a worm germinated from the stool. He loses his superior knowledge and cries under the spell of māyā.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Falling on the ground, smeared with blood, he moves around like a worm and cries loudly. Having lost knowledge of his previous existence, he enters into ignorance. He moves like a worm (viṣṭhā-bhūḥ). Rorūyati should be rorūyate. His knowledge of previous existence is gone (gate jṣāne) and becomes forgetful of that state (viparītāṁ gatim). Even the devotee jīva’s knowledge is generally covered from childhood because of the nature of things. By a little association, he has his previous impressions aroused, and attains the Lord by his devotion.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.25

↗
పరచ్ఛన్దం న విదుషా పుష్యమాణో జనేన స: । అనభిప్రేతమాపన్న: ప్రత్యాఖ్యాతుమనీశ్వర: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
para-cchandaṁ na viduṣā
[para-chchandam na vidushaa]
puṣyamāṇo janena saḥ
[pushyamaano janena sah]
anabhipretam āpannaḥ
[anabhipretam aapannah]
pratyākhyātum anīśvaraḥ
[pratyaakhyaatum aneeshvarah]
para-chandam — the desire of another na — not viduṣā — understanding puṣyamāṇaḥ — being maintained janena — by persons saḥ — he anabhipretam — into undesirable circumstances āpannaḥ — fallen pratyākhyātum — to refuse anīśvaraḥ — unable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
para-cchandaṁ na viduṣā
para-chandam
the desire of another
na
not
viduṣā
understanding
puṣyamāṇo janena saḥ
puṣyamāṇaḥ
being maintained
janena
by persons
saḥ
he
anabhipretam āpannaḥ
anabhipretam
into undesirable circumstances
āpannaḥ
fallen
pratyākhyātum anīśvaraḥ
pratyākhyātum
to refuse
anīśvaraḥ
unable.
After coming out of the abdomen, the child is given to the care of persons who are unable to understand what he wants, and thus he is nursed by such persons. Unable to refuse whatever is given to him, he falls into undesirable circumstances.

Within the abdomen of the mother, the nourishment of the child was being carried on by nature’s own arrangement. The atmosphere within the abdomen was not at all pleasing, but as far as the child’s feeding was concerned, it was being properly done by the laws of nature. But upon coming out of the abdomen the child falls into a different atmosphere. He wants to eat one thing, but something else is given to him because no one knows his actual demand, and he cannot refuse the undesirables given to him. Sometimes the child cries for the mother’s breast, but because the nurse thinks that it is due to pain within his stomach that he is crying, she supplies him some bitter medicine. The child does not want it, but he cannot refuse it. He is put in very awkward circumstances, and the suffering continues.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nourished by those who do not understand his desires, falling into undesirable condition, unable to protest, he cries. Crying because he wants milk, his mother and others think he has a stomach ache and feed him nīma juice. When he has a stomach ache they think he is hungry, and they feed him milk. Unable to refuse, he cries. (The verb from the previous sentence is understood.)
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.26

↗
శాయితోఽశుచిపర్యఙ్కే జన్తు: స్వేదజ-దూషితే । నేశ: కణ్డూయనేఽఙ్గానామాసనోత్థానచేష్టనే ॥ ౨౬ ॥
śāyito ’śuci-paryaṅke
[shaayito ’shuchi-paryanke]
jantuḥ svedaja-dūṣite
[jantuh svedaja-dooshite]
neśaḥ kaṇḍūyane ’ṅgānām
[neshah kandooyane ’ngaanaam]
āsanotthāna-ceṣṭane
[aasanotthaana-cheshtane]
śāyitaḥ — laid down aśuci-paryaṅke — on a foul bed jantuḥ — the child sveda-ja — with creatures born from sweat dūṣite — infested na īśaḥ — incapable of kaṇḍūyane — scratching aṅgānām — his limbs āsana — sitting utthāna — standing ceṣṭane — or moving.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śāyito ’śuci-paryaṅke
śāyitaḥ
laid down
jantuḥ svedaja-dūṣite
neśaḥ kaṇḍūyane ’ṅgānām
āsanotthāna-ceṣṭane
aśuci-paryaṅke
on a foul bed
jantuḥ
the child
sveda-ja
with creatures born from sweat
dūṣite
infested
na īśaḥ
incapable of
kaṇḍūyane
scratching
aṅgānām
his limbs
āsana
sitting
utthāna
standing
ceṣṭane
or moving.
Laid down on a foul bed infested with sweat and germs, the poor child is incapable of scratching his body to get relief from his itching sensation, to say nothing of sitting up, standing or even moving.

It should be noted that the child is born crying and suffering. After birth the same suffering continues, and he cries. Because he is disturbed by the germs in his foul bed, which is contaminated by his urine and stool, the poor child continues to cry. He is unable to take any remedial measure for his relief.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Laid in an unclean bed infested with insects, he is not able to scratch his limbs, or sit or stand.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.27

↗
తుదన్త్యామత్వచం దంశా మశకా మత్కుణాదయ: । రుదన్తం విగతజ్ఞానం కృమయ: కృమికం యథా ॥ ౨౭ ॥
tudanty āma-tvacaṁ daṁśā
[tudanty aama-tvacham damshaa]
maśakā matkuṇādayaḥ
[mashakaa matkunaadayah]
rudantaṁ vigata-jṣānaṁ
[rudantam vigata-jshaanam]
kṛmayaḥ kṛmikaṁ yathā
[krimayah krimikam yathaa]
tudanti — they bite āma-tvacam — the baby, whose skin is soft daṁśāḥ — gnats maśakāḥ — mosquitoes matkuṇa — bugs ādayaḥ — and other creatures rudantam — crying vigata — deprived of jṣānam — wisdom kṛmayaḥ — worms kṛmikam — a worm yathā — just as.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tudanty āma-tvacaṁ daṁśā
tudanti
they bite
āma-tvacam
the baby, whose skin is soft
daṁśāḥ
gnats
maśakā matkuṇādayaḥ
maśakāḥ
mosquitoes
matkuṇa
bugs
ādayaḥ
and other creatures
rudantaṁ vigata-jṣānaṁ
rudantam
crying
vigata
deprived of
jṣānam
wisdom
kṛmayaḥ kṛmikaṁ yathā
kṛmayaḥ
worms
kṛmikam
a worm
yathā
just as.
In his helpless condition, gnats, mosquitoes, bugs and other germs bite the baby, whose skin is tender, just as smaller worms bite a big worm. The child, deprived of his wisdom, cries bitterly.

The word vigata jṣānam means that the spiritual knowledge which the child developed in the abdomen is already lost to the spell of māyā. Owing to various kinds of disturbances and to being out of the abdomen, the child cannot remember what he was thinking of for his salvation. It is assumed that even if a person acquires some spiritually uplifting knowledge, circumstantially he is prone to forget it. Not only children but also elderly persons should be very careful to protect their sense of Kṛṣṇa consciousness and avoid unfavorable circumstances so that they may not forget their prime duty.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as big worms bit small worms, gnats, mosquitoes and other bugs bit the baby with his soft skin, who cries in ignorance. Āmā means soft. Kṛmikam means small worm.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.28

↗
ఇత్యేవం శైశవం భుక్త్వా దు:ఖం పౌగణ్డమేవ చ । అలబ్ధాభీప్సితోఽజ్ఞానాదిద్ధమన్యు: శుచార్పిత: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
ity evaṁ śaiśavaṁ bhuktvā
[ity evam shaishavam bhuktvaa]
duḥkhaṁ paugaṇḍam eva ca
[duhkham paugandam eva cha]
alabdhābhīpsito ’jṣānād
[alabdhaabheepsito ’jshaanaad]
iddha-manyuḥ śucārpitaḥ
[iddha-manyuh shuchaarpitah]
iti evam — in this way śaiśavam — childhood bhuktvā — having undergone duḥkham — distress paugaṇḍam — boyhood eva — even ca — and alabdha — not achieved abhīpsitaḥ — he whose desires ajṣānāt — due to ignorance iddha — kindled manyuḥ — his anger śucā — by sorrow arpitaḥ — overcome.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity evaṁ śaiśavaṁ bhuktvā
iti evam
in this way
śaiśavam
childhood
bhuktvā
having undergone
duḥkhaṁ paugaṇḍam eva ca
duḥkham
distress
paugaṇḍam
boyhood
eva
even
ca
and
alabdhābhīpsito ’jṣānād
alabdha
not achieved
abhīpsitaḥ
he whose desires
ajṣānāt
due to ignorance
iddha-manyuḥ śucārpitaḥ
iddha
kindled
manyuḥ
his anger
śucā
by sorrow
arpitaḥ
overcome.
In this way, the child passes through his childhood, suffering different kinds of distress, and attains boyhood. In boyhood also he suffers pain over desires to get things he can never achieve. And thus, due to ignorance, he becomes angry and sorry.

From birth to the end of five years of age is called childhood. After five years up to the end of the fifteenth year is called paugaṇḍa. At sixteen years of age, youth begins. The distresses of childhood are already explained, but when the child attains boyhood he is enrolled in a school which he does not like. He wants to play, but he is forced to go to school and study and take responsibility for passing examinations. Another kind of distress is that he wants to get some things with which to play, but circumstances may be such that he is not able to attain them, and he thus becomes aggrieved and feels pain. In one word, he is unhappy, even in his boyhood, just as he was unhappy in his childhood, what to speak of youth. Boys are apt to create so many artificial demands for playing, and when they do not attain satisfaction they become furious with anger, and the result is suffering.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way he passes through distressful infancy and boyhood .When his desires are not achieved, he becomes overcome with anger and sorrow out of ignorance. He becomes enflamed with anger, and inundated with grief.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.29

↗
సహ దేహేన మానేన వర్ధమానేన మన్యునా । కరోతి విగ్రహం కామీ కామిష్వన్తాయ చాత్మన: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
saha dehena mānena
[saha dehena maanena]
vardhamānena manyunā
[vardhamaanena manyunaa]
karoti vigrahaṁ kāmī
[karoti vigraham kaamee]
kāmiṣv antāya cātmanaḥ
[kaamishv antaaya chaatmanah]
saha — with dehena — the body mānena — with false prestige vardhamānena — increasing manyunā — on account of anger karoti — he creates vigraham — enmity kāmī — the lusty person kāmiṣu — towards other lusty people antāya — for destruction ca — and ātmanaḥ — of his soul.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saha dehena mānena
saha
with
dehena
the body
mānena
with false prestige
vardhamānena manyunā
vardhamānena
increasing
manyunā
on account of anger
karoti vigrahaṁ kāmī
karoti
he creates
vigraham
enmity
kāmī
the lusty person
kāmiṣv antāya cātmanaḥ
kāmiṣu
towards other lusty people
antāya
for destruction
ca
and
ātmanaḥ
of his soul.
With the growth of the body, the living entity, in order to vanquish his soul, increases his false prestige and anger and thereby creates enmity towards similarly lusty people.

In Bhagavad-gītā, Third Chapter, verse 36, Arjuna inquired from Kṛṣṇa about the cause of a living being’s lust. It is said that a living entity is eternal and, as such, qualitatively one with the Supreme Lord. Then what is the reason he falls prey to the material and commits so many sinful activities by the influence of the material energy? In reply to this question, Lord Kṛṣṇa said that it is lust which causes a living entity to glide down from his exalted position to the abominable condition of material existence. This lust circumstantially changes into anger. Both lust and anger stand on the platform of the mode of passion. Lust is actually the product of the mode of passion, and in the absence of satisfaction of lust, the same desire transforms into anger on the platform of ignorance. When ignorance covers the soul, it is the source of his degradation to the most abominable condition of hellish life.

To raise oneself from hellish life to the highest position of spiritual understanding is to transform this lust into love of Kṛṣṇa. Śrī Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura, a great ācārya of the Vaiṣṇava sampradāya, said, kāma kṛṣṇa-karmārpaṇe: due to our lust, we want many things for our sense gratification, but the same lust can be transformed in a purified way so that we want everything for the satisfaction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Anger also can be utilized towards a person who is atheistic or who is envious of the Personality of Godhead. As we have fallen into this material existence because of our lust and anger, the same two qualities can be utilized for the purpose of advancing in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and one can elevate himself again to his former pure, spiritual position. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has therefore recommended that because in material existence we have so many objects of sense gratification, which we need for the maintenance of the body, we should use all of them without attachment, for the purpose of satisfying the senses of Kṛṣṇa; that is actual renunciation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By anger, along with increasing bodily identity, and becoming full of desires, he creates quarrel with other lusty people, leading to his own destruction.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.30

↗
భూతై: పఞ్చభిరారబ్ధే దేహే దేహ్యబుధోఽసకృత్ । అహంమమేత్యసద్గ్రాహ: కరోతి కుమతిర్మతిమ్ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
bhūtaiḥ paṣcabhir ārabdhe
[bhootaih pashchabhir aarabdhe]
dehe dehy abudho ’sakṛt
[dehe dehy abudho ’sakrit]
ahaṁ mamety asad-grāhaḥ
[aham mamety asad-graahah]
karoti kumatir matim
[karoti kumatir matim]
bhūtaiḥ — by material elements paṣcabhiḥ — five ārabdhe — made dehe — in the body dehī — the living entity abudhaḥ — ignorant asakṛt — constantly aham — I mama — mine iti — thus asat — nonpermanent things grāhaḥ — accepting karoti — he does ku-matiḥ — being foolish matim — thought.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūtaiḥ paṣcabhir ārabdhe
bhūtaiḥ
by material elements
paṣcabhiḥ
five
ārabdhe
made
dehe dehy abudho ’sakṛt
dehe
in the body
dehī
the living entity
abudhaḥ
ignorant
ahaṁ mamety asad-grāhaḥ
asakṛt
constantly
aham
I
karoti kumatir matim
mama
mine
iti
thus
asat
nonpermanent things
grāhaḥ
accepting
karoti
he does
ku-matiḥ
being foolish
matim
thought.
By such ignorance the living entity accepts the material body, which is made of five elements, as himself. With this misunderstanding, he accepts nonpermanent things as his own and increases his ignorance in the darkest region.

The expansion of ignorance is explained in this verse. The first ignorance is to identify one’s material body, which is made of five elements, as the self, and the second is to accept something as one’s own due to a bodily connection. In this way, ignorance expands. The living entity is eternal, but because of his accepting nonpermanent things, misidentifying his interest, he is put into ignorance, and therefore he suffers material pangs.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The ignorant, foolish jīva, in a body made of the five elements, constantly thinks in terms of I and mine, accepting the impermanent. His ignorance is illustrated. His body is made of five elements. It is clear that the body is not the self. However, he thinks that the body is himself and objects belong to that body (I and mine). He accepts impermanent things rather than eternal things.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.31

↗
తదర్థం కురుతే కర్మ యద్బద్ధో యాతి సంసృతిమ్ । యోఽనుయాతి దదత్‍క్‍లేశమవిద్యాకర్మబన్ధన: ॥ ౩౧ ॥
tad-arthaṁ kurute karma
[tad-artham kurute karma]
yad-baddho yāti saṁsṛtim
[yad-baddho yaati samsritim]
yo ’nuyāti dadat kleśam
[yo ’nuyaati dadat klesham]
avidyā-karma-bandhanaḥ
[avidyaa-karma-bandhanah]
tat-artham — for the sake of the body kurute — he performs karma — actions yat-baddhaḥ — bound by which yāti — he goes saṁsṛtim — to repeated birth and death yaḥ — which body anuyāti — follows dadat — giving kleśam — misery avidyā — by ignorance karma — by fruitive activities bandhanaḥ — the cause of bondage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad-arthaṁ kurute karma
tat-artham
for the sake of the body
kurute
he performs
karma
actions
yad-baddho yāti saṁsṛtim
yat-baddhaḥ
bound by which
yāti
he goes
saṁsṛtim
to repeated birth and death
yo ’nuyāti dadat kleśam
yaḥ
which body
avidyā-karma-bandhanaḥ
anuyāti
follows
dadat
giving
kleśam
misery
avidyā
by ignorance
karma
by fruitive activities
bandhanaḥ
the cause of bondage.
For the sake of the body, which is a source of constant trouble to him and which follows him because he is bound by ties of ignorance and fruitive activities, he performs various actions which cause him to be subjected to repeated birth and death.

In Bhagavad-gītā it is said that one has to work to satisfy Yajṣa, or Viṣṇu, for any work done without the purpose of satisfying the Supreme Personality of Godhead is a cause of bondage. In the conditioned state a living entity, accepting his body as himself, forgets his eternal relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead and acts on the interest of his body. He takes the body as himself, his bodily expansions as his kinsmen, and the land from which his body is born as worshipable. In this way he performs all sorts of misconceived activities, which lead to his perpetual bondage in repetition of birth and death in various species.

In modern civilization, the so-called social, national and government leaders mislead people more and more, under the bodily conception of life, with the result that all the leaders, with their followers, are gliding down to hellish conditions birth after birth. An example is given in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ: when a blind man leads several other blind men, the result is that all of them fall down in a ditch. This is actually happening. There are many leaders to lead the ignorant public, but because every one of them is bewildered by the bodily conception of life, there is no peace and prosperity in human society. So-called yogīs who perform various bodily feats are also in the same category as such ignorant people because the haṭha-yoga system is especially recommended for persons who are grossly implicated in the bodily conception. The conclusion is that as long as one is fixed in the bodily conception, he has to suffer birth and death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
For his body he performs actions by which he becomes bound up and continues saṁsāra. That body continually gives suffering, and becomes bound to karmic reactions by ignorance. For his body (tad-artham) he performs actions, by which he becomes bound (yad-baddhaḥ). That body (yaḥ) continues to give suffering such as hell to the jīva and becomes bound by karma through ignorance. His foolishness is that by doing sinful actions the body gives suffering.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.32

↗
యద్యసద్‌భి: పథి పున: శిశ్నోదరకృతోద్యమై: । ఆస్థితో రమతే జన్తుస్తమో విశతి పూర్వవత్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
yady asadbhiḥ pathi punaḥ
[yady asadbhih pathi punah]
śiśnodara-kṛtodyamaiḥ
[shishnodara-kritodyamaih]
āsthito ramate jantus
[aasthito ramate jantus]
tamo viśati pūrvavat
[tamo vishati poorvavat]
yadi — if asadbhiḥ — with the unrighteous pathi — on the path punaḥ — again śiśna — for the genitals udara — for the stomach kṛta — done udyamaiḥ — whose endeavors āsthitaḥ — associating ramate — enjoys jantuḥ — the living entity tamaḥ — darkness viśati — enters pūrva-vat — as before.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yady asadbhiḥ pathi punaḥ
yadi
if
asadbhiḥ
with the unrighteous
pathi
on the path
punaḥ
again
śiśnodara-kṛtodyamaiḥ
śiśna
for the genitals
udara
for the stomach
kṛta
done
udyamaiḥ
whose endeavors
āsthito ramate jantus
āsthitaḥ
associating
ramate
enjoys
jantuḥ
the living entity
tamo viśati pūrvavat
tamaḥ
darkness
viśati
enters
pūrva-vat
as before.
If, therefore, the living entity again associates with the path of unrighteousness, influenced by sensually minded people engaged in the pursuit of sexual enjoyment and the gratification of the palate, he again goes to hell as before.

It has been explained that the conditioned soul is put into the Andha-tāmisra and Tāmisra hellish conditions, and after suffering there he gets a hellish body like the dog’s or hog’s. After several such births, he again comes into the form of a human being. How the human being is born is also described by Kapiladeva. The human being develops in the mother’s abdomen and suffers there and comes out again. After all these sufferings, if he gets another chance in a human body and wastes his valuable time in the association of persons who are concerned with sexual life and palatable dishes, then naturally he again glides down to the same Andha-tāmisra and Tāmisra hells.

Generally, people are concerned with the satisfaction of the tongue and the satisfaction of the genitals. That is material life. Material life means eat, drink, be merry and enjoy, with no concern for understanding one’s spiritual identity and the process of spiritual advancement. Since materialistic people are concerned with the tongue, belly and genitals, if anyone wants to advance in spiritual life he must be very careful about associating with such people. To associate with such materialistic men is to commit purposeful suicide in the human form of life. It is said, therefore, that an intelligent man should give up such undesirable association and should always mix with saintly persons. When he is in association with saintly persons, all his doubts about the spiritual expansion of life are eradicated, and he makes tangible progress on the path of spiritual understanding. It is also sometimes found that people are very much addicted to a particular type of religious faith. Hindus, Muslims and Christians are faithful in their particular type of religion, and they go to the church, temple or mosque, but unfortunately they cannot give up the association of persons who are too much addicted to sex life and satisfaction of the palate. Here it is clearly said that one may officially be a very religious man, but if he associates with such persons, then he is sure to slide down to the darkest region of hell.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If the human enjoys in his life by associating with sinful persons with efforts for satisfying the genital and stomach, he enters hell as before. As before, he will again get a body fit for hellish punishments and enter hell. This implies also that, if instead of associating with sinful people, he enjoys in his life with efforts for serving Kṛṣṇa again, he will attain Kṛṣṇa. In that case pūrvavat means “as previously described for the devotee.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.33

↗
సత్యం శౌచం దయా మౌనం బుద్ధి: శ్రీర్హ్రీర్యశ: క్షమా । శమో దమో భగశ్చేతి యత్సఙ్గాద్యాతి సఙ్‍క్షయమ్ ॥ ౩౩ ॥
satyaṁ śaucaṁ dayā maunaṁ
[satyam shaucham dayaa maunam]
buddhiḥ śrīr hrīr yaśaḥ kṣamā
[buddhih shreer hreer yashah kshamaa]
śamo damo bhagaś ceti
[shamo damo bhagash cheti]
yat-saṅgād yāti saṅkṣayam
[yat-sangaad yaati sankshayam]
satyam — truthfulness śaucam — cleanliness dayā — mercy maunam — gravity buddhiḥ — intelligence śrīḥ — prosperity hrīḥ — shyness yaśaḥ — fame kṣamā — forgiveness śamaḥ — control of the mind damaḥ — control of the senses bhagaḥ — fortune ca — and iti — thus yat-saṅgāt — from association with whom yāti saṅkṣayam — are destroyed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satyaṁ śaucaṁ dayā maunaṁ
satyam
truthfulness
śaucam
cleanliness
dayā
mercy
maunam
gravity
buddhiḥ śrīr hrīr yaśaḥ kṣamā
buddhiḥ
intelligence
śrīḥ
prosperity
hrīḥ
shyness
yaśaḥ
fame
kṣamā
forgiveness
śamo damo bhagaś ceti
śamaḥ
control of the mind
damaḥ
control of the senses
bhagaḥ
fortune
ca
and
iti
thus
yat-saṅgād yāti saṅkṣayam
yat-saṅgāt
from association with whom
yāti saṅkṣayam
are destroyed.
He becomes devoid of truthfulness, cleanliness, mercy, gravity, spiritual intelligence, shyness, austerity, fame, forgiveness, control of the mind, control of the senses, fortune and all such opportunities.

Those who are too addicted to sex life cannot understand the purpose of the Absolute Truth, nor can they be clean in their habits, not to mention showing mercy to others. They cannot remain grave, and they have no interest in the ultimate goal of life. The ultimate goal of life is Kṛṣṇa, or Viṣṇu, but those who are addicted to sex life cannot understand that their ultimate interest is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Such people have no sense of decency, and even in public streets or public parks they embrace each other just like cats and dogs and pass it off in the name of love-making. Such unfortunate creatures can never become materially prosperous. Behavior like that of cats and dogs keeps them in the position of cats and dogs. They cannot improve any material condition, not to speak of becoming famous. Such foolish persons may even make a show of so-called yoga, but they are unable to control the senses and mind, which is the real purpose of yoga practice. Such people can have no opulence in their lives. In a word, they are very unfortunate.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From that association, truth, cleanliness, mercy, silence, intelligence, beauty, shyness, fame, forgiveness, control of mind, control of the sense, and good fortune are destroyed.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.34

↗
తేష్వశాన్తేషు మూఢేషు ఖణ్డితాత్మస్వసాధుషు । సఙ్గం న కుర్యాచ్ఛోచ్యేషు యోషిత్క్రీడామృగేషు చ ॥ ౩౪ ॥
teṣv aśānteṣu mūḍheṣu
[teshv ashaanteshu moodheshu]
khaṇḍitātmasv asādhuṣu
[khanditaatmasv asaadhushu]
saṅgaṁ na kuryāc chocyeṣu
[sangam na kuryaach chochyeshu]
yoṣit-krīḍā-mṛgeṣu ca
[yoshit-kreedaa-mrigeshu cha]
teṣu — with those aśānteṣu — coarse mūḍheṣu — fools khaṇḍita-ātmasu — bereft of self-realization asādhuṣu — wicked saṅgam — association na — not kuryāt — one should make śocyeṣu — pitiable yoṣit — of women krīḍā-mṛgeṣu — dancing dogs ca — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
teṣv aśānteṣu mūḍheṣu
teṣu
with those
aśānteṣu
coarse
mūḍheṣu
fools
khaṇḍitātmasv asādhuṣu
khaṇḍita-ātmasu
bereft of self-realization
asādhuṣu
wicked
saṅgam
association
saṅgaṁ na kuryāc chocyeṣu
na
not
kuryāt
one should make
śocyeṣu
pitiable
yoṣit-krīḍā-mṛgeṣu ca
yoṣit
of women
krīḍā-mṛgeṣu
dancing dogs
ca
and.
One should not associate with a coarse fool who is bereft of the knowledge of self-realization and who is no more than a dancing dog in the hands of a woman.

The restriction of association with such foolish persons is especially meant for those who are in the line of advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness involves developing the qualities of truthfulness, cleanliness, mercy, gravity, intelligence in spiritual knowledge, simplicity, material opulence, fame, forgiveness, and control of the mind and the senses. All these qualities are to be manifested with the progress of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, but if one associates with a śūdra, a foolish person who is like a dancing dog in the hands of a woman, then he cannot make any progress. Lord Caitanya has advised that any person who is engaged in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and who desires to pass beyond material nescience must not associate himself with women or with persons interested in material enjoyment. For a person seeking advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, such association is more dangerous than suicide.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One should not associate with sinful, violent, foolish, destroyers of the self, the most lamentable people, the playthings of women. Who is bad association? Describing such persons, Kapila forbids their association in three verses. Khaṇḍita-ātmaṣu means “those who destroy themselves because of degrading themselves.” (The ātmā cannot be destroyed.)
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.35

↗
న తథాస్య భవేన్మోహో బన్ధశ్చాన్యప్రసఙ్గత: । యోషిత్సఙ్గాద్యథా పుంసో యథా తత్సఙ్గిసఙ్గత: ॥ ౩౫ ॥
na tathāsya bhaven moho
[na tathaasya bhaven moho]
bandhaś cānya-prasaṅgataḥ
[bandhash chaanya-prasangatah]
yoṣit-saṅgād yathā puṁso
[yoshit-sangaad yathaa pumso]
yathā tat-saṅgi-saṅgataḥ
[yathaa tat-sangi-sangatah]
na — not tathā — in that manner asya — of this man bhavet — may arise mohaḥ — infatuation bandhaḥ — bondage ca — and anya-prasaṅgataḥ — from attachment to any other object yoṣit-saṅgāt — from attachment to women yathā — as puṁsaḥ — of a man yathā — as tat-saṅgi — of men who are fond of women saṅgataḥ — from the fellowship.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na tathāsya bhaven moho
na
not
tathā
in that manner
asya
of this man
bhavet
may arise
mohaḥ
infatuation
bandhaś cānya-prasaṅgataḥ
bandhaḥ
bondage
ca
and
anya-prasaṅgataḥ
from attachment to any other object
yoṣit-saṅgād yathā puṁso
yoṣit-saṅgāt
from attachment to women
yathā
as
puṁsaḥ
of a man
yathā tat-saṅgi-saṅgataḥ
yathā
as
tat-saṅgi
of men who are fond of women
saṅgataḥ
from the fellowship.
The infatuation and bondage which accrue to a man from attachment to any other object is not as complete as that resulting from attachment to a woman or to the fellowship of men who are fond of women.

Attachment to women is so contaminating that one becomes attached to the condition of material life not only by the association of women but by the contaminated association of persons who are too attached to them. There are many reasons for our conditional life in the material world, but the topmost of all such causes is the association of women, as will be confirmed in the following stanzas.

In Kali-yuga, association with women is very strong. In every step of life, there is association with women. If a person goes to purchase something, the advertisements are full of pictures of women. The physiological attraction for women is very great, and therefore people are very slack in spiritual understanding. The Vedic civilization, being based on spiritual understanding, arranges association with women very cautiously. Out of the four social divisions, the members of the first order (namely brahmacarya ), the third order ( vānaprastha ) and the fourth order ( sannyāsa ) are strictly prohibited from female association. Only in one order, the householder, is there license to mix with women under restricted conditions. In other words, attraction for woman’s association is the cause of the material conditional life, and anyone interested in being freed from this conditional life must detach himself from the association of women.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Man’s bondage and bewilderment is not due to attachment to objects as much as it is due to his association with woman and to his association with men who associate with women. The word ca (and) should be added with tat-saṅgi-saṅgataḥ.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.36

↗
ప్రజాపతి: స్వాం దుహితరం దృష్ట్వా తద్రూపధర్షిత: । రోహిద్భూతాం సోఽన్వధావద‍ృక్షరూపీ హతత్రప: ॥ ౩౬ ॥
prajāpatiḥ svāṁ duhitaraṁ
[prajaapatih svaam duhitaram]
dṛṣṭvā tad-rūpa-dharṣitaḥ
[drishtvaa tad-roopa-dharshitah]
rohid-bhūtāṁ so ’nvadhāvad
[rohid-bhootaam so ’nvadhaavad]
ṛkṣa-rūpī hata-trapaḥ
[riksha-roopee hata-trapah]
prajā-patiḥ — Lord Brahmā svām — his own duhitaram — daughter dṛṣṭvā — having seen tat-rūpa — by her charms dharṣitaḥ — bewildered rohit-bhūtām — to her in the form of a deer saḥ — he anvadhāvat — ran ṛkṣa-rūpī — in the form of a stag hata — bereft of trapaḥ — shame.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prajāpatiḥ svāṁ duhitaraṁ
prajā-patiḥ
Lord Brahmā
svām
his own
duhitaram
daughter
dṛṣṭvā tad-rūpa-dharṣitaḥ
dṛṣṭvā
having seen
tat-rūpa
by her charms
dharṣitaḥ
bewildered
rohid-bhūtāṁ so ’nvadhāvad
rohit-bhūtām
to her in the form of a deer
ṛkṣa-rūpī hata-trapaḥ
saḥ
he
anvadhāvat
ran
ṛkṣa-rūpī
in the form of a stag
hata
bereft of
trapaḥ
shame.
At the sight of his own daughter, Brahmā was bewildered by her charms and shamelessly ran up to her in the form of a stag when she took the form of a hind.

Lord Brahmā’s being captivated by the charms of his daughter and Lord Śiva’s being captivated by the Mohinī form of the Lord are specific instances which instruct us that even great demigods like Brahmā and Lord Śiva, what to speak of the ordinary conditioned soul, are captivated by the beauty of woman. Therefore, everyone is advised that one should not freely mix even with one’s daughter, mother or sister because the senses are so strong that when one becomes infatuated the senses do not consider the relationship of daughter, mother or sister. It is best, therefore, to practice controlling the senses by performing bhakti-yoga, engaging in the service of Madana-mohana. Lord Kṛṣṇa’s name is Madana-mohana, for He can subdue the god Cupid, or lust. Only by engaging in the service of Madana-mohana can one curb the dictates of Madana, Cupid. Otherwise, attempts to control the senses will fail.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā, seeing his own daughter, became bewildered, and taking the form of a stag, devoid of shame, pursued her when she took the form of a doe. One should not say that a woman cannot bewilder the intelligence of great souls endowed with discriminating knowledge. Brahmā, taking the form of a buck (rohid-bhūtam), pursued his daughter in the form of a doe.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.37

↗
తత్సృష్టసృష్టసృష్టేషు కో న్వఖణ్డితధీ: పుమాన్ । ఋషిం నారాయణమృతే యోషిన్మయ్యేహ మాయయా ॥ ౩౭ ॥
tat-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭeṣu
[tat-srishta-srishta-srishteshu]
ko nv akhaṇḍita-dhīḥ pumān
[ko nv akhandita-dheeh pumaan]
ṛṣiṁ nārāyaṇam ṛte
[rishim naaraayanam rite]
yoṣin-mayyeha māyayā
[yoshin-mayyeha maayayaa]
tat — by Brahmā sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭeṣu — amongst all living entities begotten kaḥ — who nu — indeed akhaṇḍita — not distracted dhīḥ — his intelligence pumān — male ṛṣim — the sage nārāyaṇam — Nārāyaṇa ṛte — except yoṣit-mayyā — in the form of a woman iha — here māyayā — by māyā..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭeṣu
tat
by Brahmā
sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭa-sṛṣṭeṣu
amongst all living entities begotten
kaḥ
who
nu
indeed
ko nv akhaṇḍita-dhīḥ pumān
akhaṇḍita
not distracted
dhīḥ
his intelligence
pumān
male
ṛṣiṁ nārāyaṇam ṛte
ṛṣim
the sage
nārāyaṇam
Nārāyaṇa
ṛte
except
yoṣin-mayyeha māyayā
yoṣit-mayyā
in the form of a woman
iha
here
māyayā
by māyā..
Amongst all kinds of living entities begotten by Brahmā, namely men, demigods and animals, none but the sage Nārāyaṇa is immune to the attraction of māyā in the form of woman.

The first living creature is Brahmā himself, and from him were created sages like Marīci, who in their turn created Kaśyapa Muni and others, and Kaśyapa Muni and the Manus created different demigods and human beings, etc. But there is none among them who is not attracted by the spell of māyā in the form of woman. Throughout the entire material world, beginning from Brahmā down to the small, insignificant creatures like the ant, everyone is attracted by sex life. That is the basic principle of this material world. Lord Brahmā’s being attracted by his daughter is the vivid example that no one is exempt from sexual attraction to woman. Therefore woman, is the wonderful creation of māyā to keep the conditioned soul in shackles.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Among the son of Brahmā, their sons, and the descendents of those sons, among those who do not worship Nārāyaṇa, which of them does not have their intelligence destroyed by māyā in the form of a woman? Among those created by Brahmā such as Marīci, and those created by Marīci and others such as Kaśyapa, and further descendents such as devatās and humans, those persons who do not worship Nārāyaṇa, whose intelligence is not destroyed by māyā in the form of a woman? One should not take the sentence to mean among the creations of Brahmā, who is not bewildered except for Nārāyaṇa. This would contradict the fact that Nārāyaṇa creates Brahmā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.38

↗
బలం మే పశ్య మాయాయా: స్త్రీమయ్యా జయినో దిశామ్ । యా కరోతి పదాక్రాన్తాన్భ్రూవిజృమ్భేణ కేవలమ్ ॥ ౩౮ ॥
balaṁ me paśya māyāyāḥ
[balam me pashya maayaayaah]
strī-mayyā jayino diśām
[stree-mayyaa jayino dishaam]
yā karoti padākrāntān
[yaa karoti padaakraantaan]
bhrūvi-jṛmbheṇa kevalam
[bhroovi-jrimbhena kevalam]
balam — the strength me — My paśya — behold māyāyāḥ — of māyā strī-mayyāḥ — in the shape of a woman jayinaḥ — conquerors diśām — of all directions yā — who karoti — makes pada-ākrāntān — following at her heels bhrūvi — of her eyebrows jṛmbheṇa — by the movement kevalam — merely.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
balaṁ me paśya māyāyāḥ
balam
the strength
me
My
paśya
behold
māyāyāḥ
of māyā
strī-mayyā jayino diśām
strī-mayyāḥ
in the shape of a woman
jayinaḥ
conquerors
diśām
of all directions
yā karoti padākrāntān
yā
who
karoti
makes
pada-ākrāntān
following at her heels
bhrūvi-jṛmbheṇa kevalam
bhrūvi
of her eyebrows
jṛmbheṇa
by the movement
kevalam
merely.
Just try to understand the mighty strength of My māyā in the shape of woman, who by the mere movement of her eyebrows can keep even the greatest conquerors of the world under her grip.

There are many instances in the history of the world of a great conqueror’s being captivated by the charms of a Cleopatra. One has to study the captivating potency of woman, and man’s attraction for that potency. From what source was this generated? According to Vedānta-sūtra, we can understand that everything is generated from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is enunciated there, janmādy asya yataḥ. This means that the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or the Supreme Person, Brahman, the Absolute Truth, is the source from whom everything emanates. The captivating power of woman, and man’s susceptibility to such attraction, must also exist in the Supreme Personality of Godhead in the spiritual world and must be represented in the transcendental pastimes of the Lord.

The Lord is the Supreme Person, the supreme male. As a common male wants to be attracted by a female, that propensity similarly exists in the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He also wants to be attracted by the beautiful features of a woman. Now the question is, if He wants to be captivated by such womanly attraction, would He be attracted by any material woman? It is not possible. Even persons who are in this material existence can give up womanly attraction if they are attracted by the Supreme Brahman. Such was the case with Haridāsa Ṭhākura. A beautiful prostitute tried to attract him in the dead of night, but since he was situated in devotional service, in transcendental love of Godhead, Haridāsa Ṭhākura was not captivated. Rather, he turned the prostitute into a great devotee by his transcendental association. Therefore this material attraction certainly cannot attract the Supreme Lord. When He wants to be attracted by a woman, He has to create such a woman from His own energy. That woman is Rādhārāṇī. It is explained by the Gosvāmīs that Rādhārāṇī is the manifestation of the pleasure potency of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. When the Supreme Lord wants to derive transcendental pleasure, He has to create a woman from His internal potency. Thus the tendency to be attracted by womanly beauty is natural because it exists in the spiritual world. In the material world it is reflected pervertedly, and therefore there are so many inebrieties.

Instead of being attracted by material beauty, if one is accustomed to being attracted by the beauty of Rādhārāṇī and Kṛṣṇa, then the statement of Bhagavad-gītā, paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate, holds true. When one is attracted by the transcendental beauty of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa, he is no longer attracted by material feminine beauty. That is the special significance of Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa worship. That is testified to by Yāmunācārya. He says, “Since I have become attracted by the beauty of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa, when there is attraction for a woman or a memory of sex life with a woman, I at once spit on it, and my face turns in disgust.” When we are attracted by Madana-mohana and the beauty of Kṛṣṇa and His consorts, then the shackles of conditioned life, namely the beauty of a material woman, cannot attract us.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
See the strength of my māyā in the form of a woman, who kicks the king into submission for sure by the movement of her eyebrow. Even the king, conquering all directions, entering the inner chambers is greeted by his wife as follows. “Giving me up, you go out to conquer to enjoy other women. What a rascal!” Hinting this with a movement of their brows, women kick the men, who bow down before them in submission. Kevalam here means “with certainty.” This is confirmed by Amara-koṣa. One does not have to search out reason for the queen’s action.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.39

↗
సఙ్గం న కుర్యాత్ప్రమదాసు జాతు యోగస్య పారం పరమారురుక్షు: । మత్సేవయా ప్రతిలబ్ధాత్మలాభో వదన్తి యా నిరయద్వారమస్య ॥ ౩౯ ॥
saṅgaṁ na kuryāt pramadāsu jātu
[sangam na kuryaat pramadaasu jaatu]
yogasya pāraṁ param ārurukṣuḥ
[yogasya paaram param aarurukshuh]
mat-sevayā pratilabdhātma-lābho
[mat-sevayaa pratilabdhaatma-laabho]
vadanti yā niraya-dvāram asya
[vadanti yaa niraya-dvaaram asya]
saṅgam — association na — not kuryāt — one should make pramadāsu — with women jātu — ever yogasya — of yoga pāram — culmination param — topmost ārurukṣuḥ — one who aspires to reach mat-sevayā — by rendering service unto Me pratilabdha — obtained ātma-lābhaḥ — self-realization vadanti — they say yāḥ — which women niraya — to hell dvāram — the gateway asya — of the advancing devotee.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saṅgaṁ na kuryāt pramadāsu jātu
saṅgam
association
na
not
kuryāt
one should make
pramadāsu
with women
jātu
ever
yogasya pāraṁ param ārurukṣuḥ
yogasya
of yoga
pāram
culmination
param
topmost
ārurukṣuḥ
one who aspires to reach
mat-sevayā pratilabdhātma-lābho
mat-sevayā
by rendering service unto Me
pratilabdha
obtained
ātma-lābhaḥ
self-realization
vadanti yā niraya-dvāram asya
vadanti
they say
yāḥ
which women
niraya
to hell
dvāram
the gateway
asya
of the advancing devotee.
One who aspires to reach the culmination of yoga and has realized his self by rendering service unto Me should never associate with an attractive woman, for such a woman is declared in the scripture to be the gateway to hell for the advancing devotee.

The culmination of yoga is full Kṛṣṇa consciousness. This is affirmed in Bhagavad-gītā: a person who is always thinking of Kṛṣṇa in devotion is the topmost of all yogīs. And in the Second Chapter of the First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, it is also stated that when one becomes freed from material contamination by rendering devotional service unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he can at that time understand the science of God.

Here the word pratilabdhātma-lābhaḥ occurs. Ātmā means “self,” and lābha means “gain.” Generally, conditioned souls have lost their ātmā, or self, but those who are transcendentalists have realized the self. It is directed that such a self-realized soul who aspires to the topmost platform of yogic perfection should not associate with young women. In the modern age, however, there are so many rascals who recommend that while one has genitals he should enjoy women as much as he likes, and at the same time he can become a yogī. In no standard yoga system is the association of women accepted. It is clearly stated here that the association of women is the gateway to hellish life. The association of woman is very much restricted in the Vedic civilization. Out of the four social divisions, the brahmacārī, vānaprastha and the sannyāsī — three orders — are strictly prohibited from the association of women; only the gṛhasthas, or householders, are given license to have an intimate relationship with a woman, and that relationship is also restricted for begetting nice children. If, however, one wants to stick to continued existence in the material world, he may indulge in female association unrestrictedly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Neither the jṣānī striving for the perfection of yoga, nor the devotee who has attained realization of ātmā by service to me should be attached to women, whom the wise say, are the door to hell for any man. Because of this, neither the jṣānī aspiring to attain liberation (pāram param) nor the devotee who has realized ātmā should have attachment to women (pramadāsu). According to the logic of “the person lying down cannot fall any further” [Note: Na śayāna pataty adhaḥ.] if one is a karmī, then it is not a fault to associate with women. The word asya means “any man.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.40

↗
యోపయాతి శనైర్మాయా యోషిద్దేవవినిర్మితా । తామీక్షేతాత్మనో మృత్యుం తృణై: కూపమివావృతమ్ ॥ ౪౦ ॥
yopayāti śanair māyā
[yopayaati shanair maayaa]
yoṣid deva-vinirmitā
[yoshid deva-vinirmitaa]
tām īkṣetātmano mṛtyuṁ
[taam eekshetaatmano mrityum]
tṛṇaiḥ kūpam ivāvṛtam
[trinaih koopam ivaavritam]
yā — she who upayāti — approaches śanaiḥ — slowly māyā — representation of māyā yoṣit — woman deva — by the Lord vinirmitā — created tām — her īkṣeta — one must regard ātmanaḥ — of the soul mṛtyum — death tṛṇaiḥ — with grass kūpam — a well iva — like āvṛtam — covered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yopayāti śanair māyā
yā
she who
yoṣid deva-vinirmitā
tām īkṣetātmano mṛtyuṁ
tṛṇaiḥ kūpam ivāvṛtam
upayāti
approaches
śanaiḥ
slowly
māyā
representation of māyā
yoṣit
woman
deva
by the Lord
vinirmitā
created
tām
her
īkṣeta
one must regard
ātmanaḥ
of the soul
mṛtyum
death
tṛṇaiḥ
with grass
kūpam
a well
iva
like
āvṛtam
covered.
The woman, created by the Lord, is the representation of māyā, and one who associates with such māyā by accepting services must certainly know that this is the way of death, just like a blind well covered with grass.

Sometimes it happens that a rejected well is covered by grass, and an unwary traveler who does not know of the existence of the well falls down, and his death is assured. Similarly, association with a woman begins when one accepts service from her, because woman is especially created by the Lord to give service to man. By accepting her service, a man is entrapped. If he is not intelligent enough to know that she is the gateway to hellish life, he may indulge in her association very liberally. This is restricted for those who aspire to ascend to the transcendental platform. Even fifty years ago in Hindu society, such association was restricted. A wife could not see her husband during the daytime. Householders even had different residential quarters. The internal quarters of a residential house were for the woman, and the external quarters were for the man. Acceptance of service rendered by a woman may appear very pleasing, but one should be very cautious in accepting such service because it is clearly said that woman is the gateway to death, or forgetfulness of one’s self. She blocks the path of spiritual realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Māyā in the form of a woman, created by the Lord, approaches the man gently. One should see her as death, like a well covered with grass. Knowing a person’s detachment, the woman shows off her own lack of desire, and approaches him in the guise of service. She then becomes a source of disturbance. Īkṣet stands for īkṣeta (one must see). Concerning a well covered with grass, the well is thinking, “Let men fall into me!” Therefore no one should even go near that blind well. Whether one is completely indifferent, having bhakti, jṣāna or vairāgya, whether one is unconscious from madness or sleeping, or even dead, one should avoid women completely. That is the implication of the blind well.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.41

↗
యాం మన్యతే పతిం మోహాన్మన్మాయామృషభాయతీమ్ । స్త్రీత్వం స్త్రీసఙ్గత: ప్రాప్తో విత్తాపత్యగృహప్రదమ్ ॥ ౪౧ ॥
yāṁ manyate patiṁ mohān
[yaam manyate patim mohaan]
man-māyām ṛṣabhāyatīm
[man-maayaam rishabhaayateem]
strītvaṁ strī-saṅgataḥ prāpto
[streetvam stree-sangatah praapto]
vittāpatya-gṛha-pradam
[vittaapatya-griha-pradam]
yām — which manyate — she thinks patim — her husband mohāt — due to illusion mat-māyām — My māyā ṛṣabha — in the form of a man āyatīm — coming strītvam — the state of being a woman strī-saṅgataḥ — from attachment to a woman prāptaḥ — obtained vitta — wealth apatya — progeny gṛha — house pradam — bestowing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yāṁ manyate patiṁ mohān
yām
which
manyate
she thinks
patim
her husband
mohāt
due to illusion
man-māyām ṛṣabhāyatīm
mat-māyām
My māyā
ṛṣabha
in the form of a man
āyatīm
coming
strītvaṁ strī-saṅgataḥ prāpto
strītvam
the state of being a woman
strī-saṅgataḥ
from attachment to a woman
prāptaḥ
obtained
vittāpatya-gṛha-pradam
vitta
wealth
apatya
progeny
gṛha
house
pradam
bestowing.
A living entity who, as a result of attachment to a woman in his previous life, has been endowed with the form of a woman, foolishly looks upon māyā in the form of a man, her husband, as the bestower of wealth, progeny, house and other material assets.

From this verse it appears that a woman is also supposed to have been a man in his (her) previous life, and due to his attachment to his wife, he now has the body of a woman. Bhagavad-gītā confirms this: a man gets his next life’s birth according to what he thinks of at the time of death. If someone is too attached to his wife, naturally he thinks of his wife at the time of death, and in his next life he takes the body of a woman. Similarly, if a woman thinks of her husband at the time of death, naturally she gets the body of a man in the next life. In the Hindu scriptures, therefore, woman’s chastity and devotion to man is greatly emphasized. A woman’s attachment to her husband may elevate her to the body of a man in her next life, but a man’s attachment to a woman will degrade him, and in his next life he will get the body of a woman. We should always remember, as it is stated in Bhagavad-gītā, that both the gross and subtle material bodies are dresses; they are the shirt and coat of the living entity. To be either a woman or a man only involves one’s bodily dress. The soul in nature is actually the marginal energy of the Supreme Lord. Every living entity, being classified as energy, is supposed to be originally a woman, or one who is enjoyed. In the body of a man there is a greater opportunity to get out of the material clutches; there is less opportunity in the body of a woman. In this verse it is indicated that the body of a man should not be misused through forming an attachment to women and thus becoming too entangled in material enjoyment, which will result in getting the body of a woman in the next life. A woman is generally fond of household prosperity, ornaments, furniture and dresses. She is satisfied when the husband supplies all these things sufficiently. The relationship between man and woman is very complicated, but the substance is that one who aspires to ascend to the transcendental stage of spiritual realization should be very careful in accepting the association of a woman. In the stage of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, however, such restriction of association may be slackened because if a man’s and woman’s attachment is not to each other but to Kṛṣṇa, then both of them are equally eligible to get out of the material entanglement and reach the abode of Kṛṣṇa. As it is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, anyone who seriously takes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness — whether in the lowest species of life or a woman or of the less intelligent classes, such as the mercantile or laborer class — will go back home, back to Godhead, and reach the abode of Kṛṣṇa. A man should not be attached to a woman, nor should a woman be attached to a man. Both man and woman should be attached to the service of the Lord. Then there is the possibility of liberation from material entanglement for both of them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva, attaining the body of a woman from thinking of women at the point of death, out of illusion thinks of my māyā which has taken the form of a man to be her husband, the giver of wealth, sons and house. Just as woman is a cause of problems for the man with bhakti and jṣāna, man is a problem for women with bhakti and jṣāna. This is explained in two verses. The jīva who think of women at the point of death, becoming a woman thinks of that māyā who now acts as a man (ṛṣabhyāyatīm) as her husband.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.42

↗
తామాత్మనో విజానీయాత్పత్యపత్యగృహాత్మకమ్ । దైవోపసాదితం మృత్యుం మృగయోర్గాయనం యథా ॥ ౪౨ ॥
tām ātmano vijānīyāt
[taam aatmano vijaaneeyaat]
paty-apatya-gṛhātmakam
[paty-apatya-grihaatmakam]
daivopasāditaṁ mṛtyuṁ
[daivopasaaditam mrityum]
mṛgayor gāyanaṁ yathā
[mrigayor gaayanam yathaa]
tām — the Lord’s māyā ātmanaḥ — of herself vijānīyāt — she should know pati — husband apatya — children gṛha — house ātmakam — consisting of daiva — by the authority of the Lord upasāditam — brought about mṛtyum — death mṛgayoḥ — of the hunter gāyanam — the singing yathā — as.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tām ātmano vijānīyāt
tām
the Lord’s māyā
ātmanaḥ
of herself
vijānīyāt
she should know
paty-apatya-gṛhātmakam
pati
husband
apatya
children
gṛha
house
ātmakam
consisting of
daivopasāditaṁ mṛtyuṁ
daiva
by the authority of the Lord
upasāditam
brought about
mṛtyum
death
mṛgayor gāyanaṁ yathā
mṛgayoḥ
of the hunter
gāyanam
the singing
yathā
as.
A woman, therefore, should consider her husband, her house and her children to be the arrangement of the external energy of the Lord for her death, just as the sweet singing of the hunter is death for the deer.

In these instructions of Lord Kapiladeva it is explained that not only is woman the gateway to hell for man, but man is also the gateway to hell for woman. It is a question of attachment. A man becomes attached to a woman because of her service, her beauty and many other assets, and similarly a woman becomes attached to a man for his giving her a nice place to live, ornaments, dress and children. It is a question of attachment for one another. As long as either is attached to the other for such material enjoyment, the woman is dangerous for the man, and the man is also dangerous for the woman. But if the attachment is transferred to Kṛṣṇa, both of them become Kṛṣṇa conscious, and then marriage is very nice. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī therefore recommends:

anāsaktasya viṣayān yathārham upayuṣjataḥ nirbandhaḥ kṛṣṇa-sambandhe yuktaṁ vairāgyam ucyate

( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.2.255)

Man and woman should live together as householders in relationship with Kṛṣṇa, only for the purpose of discharging duties in the service of Kṛṣṇa. Engage the children, engage the wife, and engage the husband, all in Kṛṣṇa conscious duties, and then all these bodily or material attachments will disappear. Since the medium is Kṛṣṇa, the consciousness is pure and there is no possibility of degradation at any time.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
She should understand that māyā in the form of husband, children and house, supplied by fate is her own death, just the deer should understand that the song of the hunter is death. She should understand that māyā in the form of husband and sons to be death, just as the deer should understand that the song of the greedy hunter, though pleasurable, is death.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.43

↗
దేహేన జీవభూతేన లోకాల్లోకమనువ్రజన్ । భుఞ్జాన ఏవ కర్మాణి కరోత్యవిరతం పుమాన్ ॥ ౪౩ ॥
dehena jīva-bhūtena
[dehena jeeva-bhootena]
lokāl lokam anuvrajan
[lokaal lokam anuvrajan]
bhuṣjāna eva karmāṇi
[bhushjaana eva karmaani]
karoty avirataṁ pumān
[karoty aviratam pumaan]
dehena — on account of the body jīva-bhūtena — possessed by the living entity lokāt — from one planet lokam — to another planet anuvrajan — wandering bhuṣjānaḥ — enjoying eva — so karmāṇi — fruitive activities karoti — he does aviratam — incessantly pumān — the living entity.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dehena jīva-bhūtena
dehena
on account of the body
jīva-bhūtena
possessed by the living entity
lokāl lokam anuvrajan
lokāt
from one planet
lokam
to another planet
anuvrajan
wandering
bhuṣjāna eva karmāṇi
bhuṣjānaḥ
enjoying
eva
so
karmāṇi
fruitive activities
karoty avirataṁ pumān
karoti
he does
aviratam
incessantly
pumān
the living entity.
Due to his particular type of body, the materialistic living entity wanders from one planet to another, following fruitive activities. In this way, he involves himself in fruitive activities and enjoys the result incessantly.

When the living entity is encaged in the material body, he is called jīva-bhūta, and when he is free from the material body he is called brahma-bhūta. By changing his material body birth after birth, he travels not only in the different species of life, but also from one planet to another. Lord Caitanya says that the living entities, bound up by fruitive activities, are wandering in this way throughout the whole universe, and if by some chance or by pious activities they get in touch with a bona fide spiritual master, by the grace of Kṛṣṇa, then they get the seed of devotional service. After getting this seed, if one sows it within his heart and pours water on it by hearing and chanting, the seed grows into a big plant, and there are fruits and flowers which the living entity can enjoy, even in this material world. That is called the brahma-bhūta stage. In his designated condition, a living entity is called materialistic, and upon being freed from all designations, when he is fully Kṛṣṇa conscious, engaged in devotional service, he is called liberated. Unless one gets the opportunity to associate with a bona fide spiritual master by the grace of the Lord, there is no possibility of one’s liberation from the cycle of birth and death in the different species of life and through the different grades of planets.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva wanders from the earth to other planets by his subtle body for enjoying the results of his actions, and completing that enjoyment (or suffering) again returns to the earth to perform actions. Repeated birth and death of the jīva is described. There is a doubt. The jīva enjoys the results in Svarga or other places by giving up the body by which he performs sinful or pious acts. What is the logic in that? (He should experience the results in the same body.) In answer this verse says that he enjoys the results with the body by which he performed his acts—by the subtle body. By the subtle body (jīva-bhūtena dehena) he wanders from the earth to Svarga or hell. He performs actions by the acquisition of false identity (caused by the subtle body). Going to other places is possible because of the jīva’s illusion. In that place, he enjoys (bhuṣjānaḥ). Finishing that enjoyment he again returns to the earth. He then performs further actions. Thus he performs actions and enjoys in the subtle body. That is explained in this verse.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.44

↗
జీవో హ్యస్యానుగో దేహో భూతేన్ద్రియమనోమయ: । తన్నిరోధోఽస్య మరణమావిర్భావస్తు సమ్భవ: ॥ ౪౪ ॥
jīvo hy asyānugo deho
[jeevo hy asyaanugo deho]
bhūtendriya-mano-mayaḥ
[bhootendriya-mano-mayah]
tan-nirodho ’sya maraṇam
[tan-nirodho ’sya maranam]
āvirbhāvas tu sambhavaḥ
[aavirbhaavas tu sambhavah]
jīvaḥ — the living entity hi — indeed asya — of him anugaḥ — suitable dehaḥ — body bhūta — gross material elements indriya — senses manaḥ — mind mayaḥ — made of tat — of the body nirodhaḥ — destruction asya — of the living entity maraṇam — death āvirbhāvaḥ — manifestation tu — but sambhavaḥ — birth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jīvo hy asyānugo deho
jīvaḥ
the living entity
hi
indeed
asya
of him
anugaḥ
suitable
dehaḥ
body
bhūtendriya-mano-mayaḥ
bhūta
gross material elements
indriya
senses
manaḥ
mind
mayaḥ
made of
tan-nirodho ’sya maraṇam
tat
of the body
nirodhaḥ
destruction
āvirbhāvas tu sambhavaḥ
asya
of the living entity
maraṇam
death
āvirbhāvaḥ
manifestation
tu
but
sambhavaḥ
birth.
In this way the living entity gets a suitable body with a material mind and senses, according to his fruitive activities. When the reaction of his particular activity comes to an end, that end is called death, and when a particular type of reaction begins, that beginning is called birth.

From time immemorial, the living entity travels in the different species of life and the different planets, almost perpetually. This process is explained in Bhagavad-gītā. Bhrāmayan sarva-bhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā: under the spell of māyā, everyone is wandering throughout the universe on the carriage of the body offered by the material energy. Materialistic life involves a series of actions and reactions. It is a long film spool of actions and reactions, and one life span is just a flash in such a reactionary show. When a child is born, it is to be understood that his particular type of body is the beginning of another set of activities, and when an old man dies, it is to be understood that one set of reactionary activities is finished.

We can see that because of different reactionary activities, one man is born in a rich family, and another is born in a poor family, although both of them are born in the same place, at the same moment and in the same atmosphere. One who is carrying pious activity with him is given a chance to take his birth in a rich or pious family, and one who is carrying impious activity is given a chance to take birth in a lower, poor family. The change of body means a change to a different field of activities. Similarly, when the body of the boy changes into that of a youth, the boyish activities change into youthful activities.

It is clear that a particular body is given to the living entity for a particular type of activity. This process is going on perpetually, from a time which is impossible to trace out. Vaiṣṇava poets therefore say, anādi karama-phale, which means that these actions and reactions of one’s activity cannot be traced, for they may even continue from the last millennium of Brahmā’s birth to the next millennium. We have seen the example in the life of Nārada Muni. In one millennium he was the son of a maidservant, and in the next millennium he became a great sage.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The subtle body and the gross body, following the soul, combine together and become the body, senses and mind. The disintegration of this combination is death for the jīva, and its recombination is called birth. “The jīva goes from the earth on dying and enjoys in Svaraga. Returning from Svarga, he is born here. From where does the conception of death and birth arise?” The subtle body (jīvaḥ), which is the covering on the jīva, and the gross body, both of which accompany the jīva, combine into one to form in the place of enjoyment, and become the body (bhūta), senses and mind. The disintegration of that combination is death for the jīva. That is the state after leaving one gross body and prior to attaining the next gross body. In states such as deep sleep the capacity for actions remains even though no actions are performed, since when deep sleep is broken, immediately one sees the capacity for actions. The appearance of the combination is called birth (sambhavaḥ). It occurs at the time of coming out of the womb after attaining another gross body, after having given up an old one.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.45-46

↗
ద్రవ్యోపలబ్ధిస్థానస్య ద్రవ్యేక్షాయోగ్యతా యదా । తత్పఞ్చత్వమహంమానాదుత్పత్తిర్ద్రవ్యదర్శనమ్ ॥ ౪౫ ॥ యథాక్ష్ణోర్ద్రవ్యావయవదర్శనాయోగ్యతా యదా । తదైవ చక్షుషో ద్రష్టుర్ద్రష్టృత్వాయోగ్యతానయో: ॥ ౪౬ ॥
dravyopalabdhi-sthānasya
[dravyopalabdhi-sthaanasya]
dravyekṣāyogyatā yadā
[dravyekshaayogyataa yadaa]
tat paṣcatvam ahaṁ-mānād
[tat pashchatvam aham-maanaad]
utpattir dravya-darśanam
[utpattir dravya-darshanam]
yathākṣṇor dravyāvayava-
[yathaakshnor dravyaavayava-]
darśanāyogyatā yadā
[darshanaayogyataa yadaa]
tadaiva cakṣuṣo draṣṭur
[tadaiva chakshusho drashtur]
draṣṭṛtvāyogyatānayoḥ
[drashtritvaayogyataanayoh]
dravya — of objects upalabdhi — of perception sthānasya — of the place dravya — of objects īkṣā — of perception ayogyatā — incapability yadā — when tat — that paṣcatvam — death aham-mānāt — from the misconception of “I” utpattiḥ — birth dravya — the physical body darśanam — viewing yathā — just as akṣṇoḥ — of the eyes dravya — of objects avayava — parts darśana — of seeing ayogyatā — incapability yadā — when tadā — then eva — indeed cakṣuṣaḥ — of the sense of sight draṣṭuḥ — of the seer draṣṭṛtva — of the faculty of seeing ayogyatā — incapability anayoḥ — of both of these.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dravyopalabdhi-sthānasya
dravya
of objects
upalabdhi
of perception
sthānasya
of the place
dravyekṣāyogyatā yadā
dravya
of objects
īkṣā
of perception
ayogyatā
incapability
yadā
when
tat paṣcatvam ahaṁ-mānād
tat
that
paṣcatvam
death
aham-mānāt
from the misconception of “I”
utpattir dravya-darśanam
utpattiḥ
birth
dravya
the physical body
darśanam
viewing
yathākṣṇor dravyāvayava-
yathā
just as
akṣṇoḥ
of the eyes
dravya
of objects
avayava
parts
darśanāyogyatā yadā
darśana
of seeing
ayogyatā
incapability
yadā
when
tadaiva cakṣuṣo draṣṭur
tadā
then
eva
indeed
cakṣuṣaḥ
of the sense of sight
draṣṭuḥ
of the seer
draṣṭṛtvāyogyatānayoḥ
draṣṭṛtva
of the faculty of seeing
ayogyatā
incapability
anayoḥ
of both of these.
When the eyes lose their power to see color or form due to morbid affliction of the optic nerve, the sense of sight becomes deadened. The living entity, who is the seer of both the eyes and the sight, loses his power of vision. In the same way, when the physical body, the place where perception of objects occurs, is rendered incapable of perceiving, that is known as death. When one begins to view the physical body as one’s very self, that is called birth.

When one says, “I see,” this means that he sees with his eyes or with his spectacles; he sees with the instrument of sight. If the instrument of sight is broken or becomes diseased or incapable of acting, then he, as the seer, also ceases to act. Similarly, in this material body, at the present moment the living soul is acting, and when the material body, due to its incapability to function, ceases, he also ceases to perform his reactionary activities. When one’s instrument of action is broken and cannot function, that is called death. Again, when one gets a new instrument for action, that is called birth. This process of birth and death is going on at every moment, by constant bodily change. The final change is called death, and acceptance of a new body is called birth. That is the solution to the question of birth and death. Actually, the living entity has neither birth nor death, but is eternal. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre: the living entity never dies, even after the death or annihilation of this material body.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When gross objects of the earth cannot be perceived by the gross organ of perception because the gross body has been destroyed, it is called death (even though the subtle organ still exists). By identifying with another gross, body birth takes place. This is the cause of seeing gross objects again. Similarly, when the gross eye ball becomes incapable of seeing gross objects because of disease, the subtle eye sense organ of a person becomes incapable of seeing. The characteristics of death and birth are again clarified. In this example, dravya means objects situated on this earth. When the gross body, the place of perceiving the objects, is destroyed and the subtle body is incapable of perceiving those objects on its own after the dissolution of the gross body, that state is called death (paṣcatvam) for the jīva, though it is not his nature. Birth arises because of the appearance of the identity with another gross body, with the thought that “I am this body.” This is the cause of seeing objects on this earth (dravya-darśanam). An example is given. When the eye balls (gross matter) are unable to see parts of objects because of destruction in the form of eye disease, then the eye sense organ (subtle) also cannot see. When both the gross organ and the subtle organ are incapable, then the seer becomes incapable of acting as a seer. That incapacity takes place on this earth, not in Svarga or hell. From understanding the explanation given in the example, the appearance and destruction of gross bodies in Svarga and hell are not really birth and death. They are simply called disappearance and appearance of the gross and subtle bodies.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.47

↗
తస్మాన్న కార్య: సన్త్రాసో న కార్పణ్యం న సమ్భ్రమ: । బుద్ధ్వా జీవగతిం ధీరో ముక్తసఙ్గశ్చరేదిహ ॥ ౪౭ ॥
tasmān na kāryaḥ santrāso
[tasmaan na kaaryah santraaso]
na kārpaṇyaṁ na sambhramaḥ
[na kaarpanyam na sambhramah]
buddhvā jīva-gatiṁ dhīro
[buddhvaa jeeva-gatim dheero]
mukta-saṅgaś cared iha
[mukta-sangash chared iha]
tasmāt — on account of death na — not kāryaḥ — should be done santrāsaḥ — horror na — not kārpaṇyam — miserliness na — not sambhramaḥ — eagerness for material gain buddhvā — realizing jīva-gatim — the true nature of the living entity dhīraḥ — steadfast mukta-saṅgaḥ — free from attachment caret — one should move about iha — in this world.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmān na kāryaḥ santrāso
tasmāt
on account of death
na
not
kāryaḥ
should be done
santrāsaḥ
horror
na kārpaṇyaṁ na sambhramaḥ
na
not
kārpaṇyam
miserliness
na
not
sambhramaḥ
eagerness for material gain
buddhvā jīva-gatiṁ dhīro
buddhvā
realizing
jīva-gatim
the true nature of the living entity
dhīraḥ
steadfast
mukta-saṅgaś cared iha
mukta-saṅgaḥ
free from attachment
caret
one should move about
iha
in this world.
Therefore, one should not view death with horror, nor have recourse to defining the body as soul, nor give way to exaggeration in enjoying the bodily necessities of life. Realizing the true nature of the living entity, one should move about in the world free from attachment and steadfast in purpose.

A sane person who has understood the philosophy of life and death is very upset upon hearing of the horrible, hellish condition of life in the womb of the mother or outside of the mother. But one has to make a solution to the problems of life. A sane man should understand the miserable condition of this material body. Without being unnecessarily upset, he should try to find out if there is a remedy. The remedial measures can be understood when one associates with persons who are liberated. It must be understood who is actually liberated. The liberated person is described in Bhagavad-gītā: one who engages in uninterrupted devotional service to the Lord, having surpassed the stringent laws of material nature, is understood to be situated in Brahman.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead is beyond the material creation. It is admitted even by impersonalists like Śaṅkarācārya that Nārāyaṇa is transcendental to this material creation. As such, when one actually engages in the service of the Lord in various forms, either Nārāyaṇa or Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa or Sītā-Rāma, he is understood to be on the platform of liberation. The Bhāgavatam also confirms that liberation means to be situated in one’s constitutional position. Since a living entity is eternally the servitor of the Supreme Lord, when one seriously and sincerely engages in the transcendental loving service of the Lord, he is situated in the position of liberation. One should try to associate with a liberated person, and then the problems of life, namely birth and death, can be solved.

While discharging devotional service in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one should not be miserly. He should not unnecessarily show that he has renounced this world. Actually, renunciation is not possible. If one renounces his palatial building and goes to a forest, there is actually no renunciation, for the palatial building is the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the forest is also the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If he changes from one property to another, that does not mean that he renounces; he was never the proprietor of either the palace or the forest. Renunciation necessitates renouncing the false understanding that one can lord it over material nature. When one renounces this false attitude and renounces the puffed-up position that he is also God, that is real renunciation. Otherwise, there is no meaning of renunciation. Rūpa Gosvāmī advises that if one renounces anything which could be applied in the service of the Lord and does not use it for that purpose, that is called phalgu-vairāgya, insufficient or false renunciation. Everything belongs to the Supreme Personality of Godhead; therefore everything can be engaged in the service of the Lord; nothing should be used for one’s sense gratification. That is real renunciation. Nor should one unnecessarily increase the necessities of the body. We should be satisfied with whatever is offered and supplied by Kṛṣṇa without much personal endeavor. We should spend our time executing devotional service in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the solution to the problem of life and death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because there is no real birth and death, one should not be horrified, miserable, or eager to enjoy in the world. Understanding the goal of the jīva, with intelligence one should move in this world free from attachment. Since one understands that the ātmā does not take birth or die (tasmāt), one should not be horrified.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.31.48

↗
సమ్యగ్దర్శనయా బుద్ధ్యా యోగవైరాగ్యయుక్తయా । మాయావిరచితే లోకే చరేన్న్యస్య కలేవరమ్ ॥ ౪౮ ॥
samyag-darśanayā buddhyā
[samyag-darshanayaa buddhyaa]
yoga-vairāgya-yuktayā
[yoga-vairaagya-yuktayaa]
māyā-viracite loke
[maayaa-virachite loke]
caren nyasya kalevaram
[charen nyasya kalevaram]
samyak-darśanayā — endowed with right vision buddhyā — through reason yoga — by devotional service vairāgya — by detachment yuktayā — strengthened māyā-viracite — arranged by māyā loke — to this world caret — one should move about nyasya — relegating kalevaram — the body.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
samyag-darśanayā buddhyā
samyak-darśanayā
endowed with right vision
buddhyā
through reason
yoga-vairāgya-yuktayā
yoga
by devotional service
vairāgya
by detachment
yuktayā
strengthened
māyā-viracite loke
māyā-viracite
arranged by māyā
loke
to this world
caren nyasya kalevaram
caret
one should move about
nyasya
relegating
kalevaram
the body.
Endowed with right vision and strengthened by devotional service and a pessimistic attitude towards material identity, one should relegate his body to this illusory world through his reason. Thus one can be unconcerned with this material world.

It is sometimes misunderstood that if one has to associate with persons engaged in devotional service, he will not be able to solve the economic problem. To answer this argument, it is described here that one has to associate with liberated persons not directly, physically, but by understanding, through philosophy and logic, the problems of life. It is stated here, samyag-darśanayā buddhyā: one has to see perfectly, and by intelligence and yogic practice one has to renounce this world. That renunciation can be achieved by the process recommended in the Second Chapter of the First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.

The devotee’s intelligence is always in touch with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. His attitude towards the material existence is one of detachment, for he knows perfectly well that this material world is a creation of illusory energy. Realizing himself to be part and parcel of the Supreme Soul, the devotee discharges his devotional service and is completely aloof from material action and reaction. Thus at the end he gives up his material body, or the material energy, and as pure soul he enters the kingdom of God.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Third Canto, Thirty-first Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Lord Kapila’s Instructions on the Movements of the Living Entities.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One should move about in this world made of māyā while giving up attachment to the body, by utilizing correct vision, intelligence, yoga and vairāgya. Kalevaraṁ nasya means giving up attachment to the body. Thus ends the commentary on Thirty-first Chapter of the Third Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Thirty-two The Path of Karma
📝 My note