FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

3.20 · Conversation Between Maitreya and Vidura

53 verses
E Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16599 chars)

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Prajapatis, or progenitors of mankind, are lent the task of procreating and expanding the number of living entities within the universe. Kardama Muni was one such prajapati. He married Devahuti, the daughter of Svayambhuva Manu, and together they had nine daughters and one son (Lord Kapiladeva). The nine daughters were married to various sages and their subsequent union caused further expansion of entities within the universe. The son, Lord Kapiladeva, presented profound philosophical truths to remind the entities what they are meant to achieve in the universe.

Previous Divine Play Next Different Entities Created Last updated 1 year ago

E - Expanding Entities (20-24)

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Prajapatis, or progenitors of mankind, are lent the task of procreating and expanding the number of living entities within the universe. Kardama Muni was one such prajapati. He married Devahuti, the daughter of Svayambhuva Manu, and together they had nine daughters and one son (Lord Kapiladeva). The nine daughters were married to various sages and their subsequent union caused further expansion of entities within the universe. The son, Lord Kapiladeva, presented profound philosophical truths to remind the entities what they are meant to achieve in the universe.

Previous Divine Play Next Different Entities Created Last updated 1 year ago

Devahuti and Kardama Muni

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Devahuti and Kardama Muni Chapter 21, 22 Vidura enquired about the dynasty of Svayambhuva Manu, whose progeny multiplied and expanded the entities within the universe. Svayambhuva Manu had two sons (Priyavrata and Uttanapada) and three daughters (Akuti, Devahuti, Prasuti). Maitreya Rishi began by describing the life of Devahuti. When Kardama Muni was ordered by Brahma to beget children, he performed 10,000 years of penance, preparing himself for successful execution of this important task, which would begin with finding a suitable wife. Pleased by the sage’s endeavours, the Lord confirmed that Svayambhuva Manu and Satarupa would offer their daughter, Devahuti, in marriage. Kardama Muni and Devahuti would then have nine daughters, after which the Lord would personally appear as her son and impart jewel-like instructions in devotional service. The events began to transpire as predicted. When Svayambhuva Manu and his wife reached his hermitage, Kardama heartily welcomed them. They expressed great respect and appreciation for each other, demonstrating the respectful culture of Varnasrama. Svayambhuva Manu described his daughter’s attraction to the sage and offered her hand in marriage. Kardama Muni glorified Devahuti’s good qualities and agreed to the marriage proposal on the condition that after bearing a child in her womb, he be permitted to renounce family life. The settlement was made, and the marriage thus took place.

Previous Different Entities Created Next Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Last updated 1 year ago

Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Chapter 23, 24 After marriage, Devahuti served her husband very faithfully, undergoing such severe austerities that she became weak and emaciated. Seeing her remarkable chastity and devotion, Kardama Muni prepared for their union as per her desire. By dint of his yogic power, he arranged an incredible aerial mansion, unparalleled opulence, and complete restoration of Devahuti’s body. They enjoyed celestial pleasures for many years, though the sage remained completely detached. Kardama Muni then divided himself into nine forms and begot nine children in Devahuti. Being overly excited, she gave birth to nine females. As her husband prepared to leave home, Devahuti felt pained. Her first lamentation was that she hadn’t taken spiritual advantage of the sage’s association, and furthermore she desired a son who would protect her. Kardama Muni reassuringly explained that the Supreme Lord would soon enter her womb. In the future, that son would bless her with enlightening wisdom. After many years, a multitude of auspicious signs confirmed that the Supreme Lord, Kapila Muni, had indeed appeared in Devahuti’s womb. After His appearance, Brahma immediately came there to worship the Lord. The universal engineer praised Kardama Muni’s unflinching adherence to his instructions, and guided the sage to offer his nine daughters to the nine principle sages. Brahma also predicted that Kapila Muni would impart invaluable instructions in detachment, devotion, and sankhya philosophy. After Brahma left, Kardama Muni discreetly approached his son and offered prayers of surrender. He requested permission to renounce family life and live as a mendicant. After receiving the go-ahead, Kardama Muni entered the forest, fixed his mind on the Supreme Lord, and thus went back to Godhead.

Previous Devahuti and Kardama Muni Next The Life Cycle Last updated 1 year ago

Different Entities Created

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Different Entities Created Chapter 20 With the earth safely back in orbit, the next step was to populate it with creatures. After briefly recapping the primary creation, Maitreya explained the steps of secondary creation by Lord Brahma, who appeared from the navel of Garbhodakasayi Vishnu. Inspired by the Lord, Brahma began the intricate process of engineering the universe. The creations included: • Five coverings of ignorance – anger, considering death to be the end, ignorance of the spirit soul, the bodily concept of life, and greed for material enjoyment • Yaksas and Raksasas (who desired to devour their creator but were unsuccessful) • Demigods, demons, ghosts, Apsaras and Gandharvas • Sadhyas, Pitas, Siddhas, Vidyadharas, Kinnaras and Kimpurusas • Snakes, serpents and nagas • Manus and the sages

Previous E - Expanding Entities (20-24) Next Devahuti and Kardama Muni Last updated 1 year ago

The Life Cycle

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle “Kardama Muni practised yoga very rigidly as a brahmacari before his marriage, and he became so powerful and attained so much mystic power that his father, Brahma, ordered him to marry and beget children as a householder. Kardama did that also; he begot nine good daughters and one son, Kapila Muni, and thus his householder duty was also performed nicely, and now his duty was to leave. Even though he had the Supreme Personality of Godhead as his son, he had to respect the authority of the Vedas. This is a very important lesson. Even if one has God in his home as his son, one should still follow the Vedic injunctions.” (SB 3.24.35)

Previous Devahuti Gives Birth and Kardama Departs Next Orders of Life Last updated 1 year ago

Occupations in Life

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Occupations in Life The Vedic social system also provides a way for each person to engage their psycho-physical nature in suitable work for individual growth and social stability. The four broad divisions are: Brahmanas (Teachers) – those who are drawn towards education, teaching and providing spiritual guidance. Their qualities: “Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, knowledge, wisdom and religiousness.” (BG 18.42) Ksatriyas (Administrators) – those who have capacity for managing, organising and ensuring upkeep of society. Their qualities: “Heroism, power, determination, resourcefulness, courage in battle, generosity and leadership.” (BG 18.43) Vaisyas (Merchants) – those who are suited for business, entrepreneurial pursuits and providing resources for society. Their qualities: “Farming, cow protection and business.” (BG 18.44) Sudras (Labourers) –those who happily serve the other three classes and provide support for the entire social system on the ground. Their qualities: “labour and service to others.” (BG 18.44) If we look at society as a body, then the sudras are the legs, the vaisyas are the stomach, the ksatriyas are the arms, and the brahmanas are the head. Each one is critically vital and equally important. Srila Prabhupada explains how cooperation between the varnas is beneficial for one and all: “The entire social structure of varna and asrama is a cooperative system meant to uplift all to the highest platform of spiritual realisation. The brahmanas are intended to be protected by the ksatriyas , and the ksatriyas also are intended to be enlightened by the brahmanas . When the brahmanas and ksatriyas cooperate nicely, the other subordinate divisions, the vaisyas , or mercantile people, and the sudras , or labourer class, automatically flourish.” (SB 3.22.4)

Previous Orders of Life Next Varieties of Varnasrama Last updated 1 year ago

Orders of Life

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Orders of Life In Sanskrit, the word asrama denotes a place of spiritual culture; typically, the residence or monastery where a guru instructs and enlightens his disciples. In a more general sense, however, asrama refers to the spiritual ‘orders of life.’ According to the Vedic model, the life cycle of every individual progresses through four asramas , or stages for spiritual development - student life ( brahmacarya ), married life ( grhastha ), retired life ( vanaprastha ), and renounced life ( sannyasa ). Each stage facilitates a unique aspect of internal development and prepares one for spiritual perfection at the final hour. Learn (brahmacarya-asrama) – in student life, one observes a vow of celibacy and receives training in self-realisation from a spiritual master. His education centres around scriptural knowledge, character development and practical skills. Whether he goes on to marry and eventually retire from family life, or whether he goes directly to the renounced order of sannyasa , the practice of brahmacarya is the indispensable foundation of success. Earn (grhasta-asrama) – in the second stage of life, typically from 25 years to 50 years, the individual will marry and raise a family. By engaging in suitable work, they earn their living in the world, and with those earnings support their family and the other three social orders. Though there is more freedom in this stage of life, the householder still lives by strict principles and honours boundaries of sexual restraint. Dutifulness and selflessness are essential qualities developed in the family context. Turn (vanaprastha-asrama) – when householders reach the age of fifty, they should ideally detach themselves from the complex network of family setup and resume a life of spiritual austerity, handing over the worldly responsibilities to the grown-up children. In this retired stage of life, a man and his wife may travel to holy places of pilgrimage and turn the focus of their lives from material responsibilities to spiritual absorption. Return (sannyasa-asrama) – in the final stage of life, the wife re-enters the family and matures to full spiritual perfection, while the husband embraces complete renunciation and dedicates himself to achieving perfect realisation and imparting spiritual understanding to the other three asramas . Thus, for the husband and wife, all other concerns are practically eliminated, and their entire attention is fully focused on returning to the spiritual world. Through this scientific setup, the Vedic culture ensures that every stage of life has meaning and value for the attainment of spiritual enlightenment. Early in his life, Kardama Muni performed many years of austerity in preparation for his forthcoming family life. Later he married Devahuti, and due to their spotless character and pure desire, the Supreme Lord agreed to become their son. Though he had God as his son, Kardama Muni still left his family life, strictly honouring the injunction that one must spend his final days away from home in the mood of renunciation. Kapiladeva encouraged His father not to deviate from the scriptures, and He assured him that as the Supreme Lord He would always be with His father, residing in his heart. Thus, Kardama Muni left his wife and son, and became a wandering sannyasi , totally dependent on Krishna for his necessities in life. Thus, in Kardama Muni we see an ideal example of how the Vedic life cycle leads to perfection. In modern society one may not be able to follow this model exactly as prescribed. That said, the principles of each asrama should be embraced, and one should make an endeavour to invest time and energy in cultivating those qualities in an appropriate way. For example, one may not have the privilege of spending the first 25 years of their life as a brahmacari , but the key principle to embrace is learning and spiritual self-development. Thus, before one gets married, one should spend quality time educating themselves and becoming trained in spiritual culture. When and how to do this is a detail which needs to be worked out individually. Similarly, older couples may not be able to leave home completely and embrace the forest life of vanaprasthas , but the principle is to turn their emphasis towards spiritual cultivation and significantly reduce their material encumbrance. An appropriate and achievable way to do this can be arranged amidst the modern pressures surrounding us.

Previous The Life Cycle Next Occupations in Life Last updated 1 year ago

Varieties of Varnasrama

E - Expanding Entities (20-24) The Life Cycle Varieties of Varnasrama Original Varnasrama (authentic spiritual society) – this system provides for material well-being and simultaneously cultures spiritual elevation. It is, in essence, a social structure based on spiritual principles of equality, respect and selfless service to one another and God. People are placed according to qualities ( guna ) and work ( karma ), actively connecting their daily activities to a transcendental goal. The most revered members in this system are those who have fully developed their spiritual consciousness, and this is possible for everyone. This system is known as daivi (divine) Varnasrama. Materialistic Varnasrama (modern-day hereditary caste system) – this system, prevalent in modern-day India, provides material well-being for select groups, and is founded upon misconceptions and deviations of the original Vedic system. One’s birth ( janma ) is taken as the only qualification for stratification, and the problem of caste brahminism thus arises, where the heads of society are often unqualified, deviant and exploitative. Although there are some authentic elements of Vedic culture in it, for the most part the members engage in materialistic religiosity for mundane gains. Spontaneous Varnasrama (‘default’ materialistic society) – this system indicates the natural division created by societies which is primarily driven by economic factors, and not founded upon any spiritual teaching whatsoever. Though people talk of a classless society, there will be unavoidable division within any community. Without it, there can be no order or efficiency. When such division takes place without spiritual supervision, we witness exploitation, corruption, conflict, huge income gaps, and a general breakdown of society due to sinful activities ( vikarma ). This type of social structure distances people from their spiritual essence. [ 13 ] Society will always divide itself into categories – each one of us have different skills and strengths, and society needs each member to engage that uniqueness so we function efficiently as one unit. Unfortunately, the exploitation of such stratification has fuelled the artificial attempt of modern culture to annihilate all division. The real need is to re-establish the original system of appropriate division founded upon spiritual principles and respect. Srila Prabhupada writes: “The divisions of varnas and asramas will continue to exist, either in their original form or in degraded form, but because they are created by the Lord, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, they cannot be extinguished. They are like the sun, a creation of God, and therefore will remain. Either covered by clouds or in a clear sky, the sun will continue to exist. Similarly, when the varnasrama system becomes degraded, it appears as a hereditary caste system, but in every society there is an intelligent class of men, a martial class, a mercantile class and a labourer class. When they are regulated for cooperation among communities according to the the Vedic principles, then there is peace and spiritual advancement.” (SB 3.21.54)

Previous Occupations in Life Next S - Sankya-yoga (25-33) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.1

↗
శౌనక ఉవాచ మహీం ప్రతిష్ఠామధ్యస్య సౌతే స్వాయమ్భువో మను: । కాన్యన్వతిష్ఠద్ ద్వారాణి మార్గాయావరజన్మనామ్ ॥ ౧ ॥
śaunaka uvāca
[shaunaka uvaacha]
mahīṁ pratiṣṭhām adhyasya
[maheem pratishthaam adhyasya]
saute svāyambhuvo manuḥ
[saute svaayambhuvo manuh]
kāny anvatiṣṭhad dvārāṇi
[kaany anvatishthad dvaaraani]
mārgāyāvara-janmanām
[maargaayaavara-janmanaam]
śaunakaḥ — Śaunaka uvāca — said mahīm — the earth pratiṣṭhām — situated adhyasya — having secured saute — O Sūta Gosvāmī svāyambhuvaḥ — Svāyambhuva manuḥ — Manu kāni — what anvatiṣṭhat — performed dvārāṇi — ways mārgāya — to get out avara — later janmanām — of those to be born.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaunaka uvāca
śaunakaḥ
Śaunaka
uvāca
said
mahīṁ pratiṣṭhām adhyasya
mahīm
the earth
pratiṣṭhām
situated
adhyasya
having secured
saute svāyambhuvo manuḥ
saute
O Sūta Gosvāmī
svāyambhuvaḥ
Svāyambhuva
manuḥ
Manu
kāny anvatiṣṭhad dvārāṇi
kāni
what
anvatiṣṭhat
performed
dvārāṇi
ways
mārgāyāvara-janmanām
mārgāya
to get out
avara
later
janmanām
of those to be born.
Śrī Śaunaka inquired: O Sūta Gosvāmī, after the earth was again situated in its orbit, what did Svāyambhuva Manu do to show the path of liberation to persons who were to take birth later on?

The appearance of the Lord as the first boar incarnation occurred during the time of Svāyambhuva Manu, whereas the present age is in the period of Vaivasvata Manu. Each Manu’s period lasts seventy-two times the cycle of four ages, and one cycle of ages equals 4,320,000 solar years. Thus 4,320,000 × 72 solar years is the reign of one Manu. In each Manu’s period there are many changes in many ways, and there are fourteen Manus within one day of Brahmā. It is understood here that Manu creates scriptural regulations for the salvation of the conditioned souls, who come to the material world for material enjoyment. The Lord is so kind that any soul who wants to enjoy in this material world is given full facility for enjoyment and at the same time he is shown the path of salvation. Śaunaka Ṛṣi, therefore, inquired from Sūta Gosvāmī: “What did Svāyambhuva Manu do after the reinstatement of the earth in its orbital situation?”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: O son of Romaharṣaṇa! When Svāyambhuva accepted the earth as his shelter, what did he do to manifest the living beings after the appearance of the Kumaṛas? The secondary creation previously described in detail is again partially in the Twentieth Chapter, in order to relate the lineage stemming from Svāyambhuva Manu. Pratiṣṭhām means shelter. O son of Romaharṣaṇa (saute)! What did he do to manifest the jīvas who took birth after the Kumāras as a pastime of the Lord (avara-janmanām)? How did he create the more recent living beings?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.2

↗
క్షత్తా మహాభాగవత: కృష్ణస్యైకాన్తిక: సుహృత్ । యస్తత్యాజాగ్రజం కృష్ణే సాపత్యమఘవానితి ॥ ౨ ॥
kṣattā mahā-bhāgavataḥ
[kshattaa mahaa-bhaagavatah]
kṛṣṇasyaikāntikaḥ suhṛt
[krishnasyaikaantikah suhrit]
yas tatyājāgrajaṁ kṛṣṇe
[yas tatyaajaagrajam krishne]
sāpatyam aghavān iti
[saapatyam aghavaan iti]
kṣattā — Vidura mahā-bhāgavataḥ — a great devotee of the Lord kṛṣṇasya — of Lord Kṛṣṇa ekāntikaḥ — unalloyed devotee suhṛt — intimate friend yaḥ — he who tatyāja — abandoned agra-jam — his elder brother (King Dhṛtarāṣṭra) kṛṣṇe — toward Kṛṣṇa sa-apatyam — along with his one hundred sons agha-vān — offender iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣattā mahā-bhāgavataḥ
kṣattā
Vidura
mahā-bhāgavataḥ
a great devotee of the Lord
kṛṣṇasyaikāntikaḥ suhṛt
kṛṣṇasya
of Lord Kṛṣṇa
ekāntikaḥ
unalloyed devotee
suhṛt
intimate friend
yas tatyājāgrajaṁ kṛṣṇe
yaḥ
he who
tatyāja
abandoned
agra-jam
his elder brother (King Dhṛtarāṣṭra)
kṛṣṇe
toward Kṛṣṇa
sāpatyam aghavān iti
sa-apatyam
along with his one hundred sons
agha-vān
offender
iti
thus.
Śaunaka Ṛṣi inquired about Vidura, who was a great devotee and friend of Lord Kṛṣṇa and who gave up the company of his elder brother because the latter, along with his sons, played tricks against the desires of the Lord.

The incident referred to here is that Vidura left the protection of his elder brother Dhṛtarāṣṭra, went traveling everywhere to sacred places and met Maitreya at Hardwar. Śaunaka Ṛṣi here inquires about the topics of the conversation between Maitreya Ṛṣi and Vidura. Vidura’s qualification was that he was not only a friend of the Lord but also a great devotee. When Kṛṣṇa tried to stop the war and mitigate the misunderstanding between the cousin-brothers, they refused to accept His counsel; therefore Kṣattā, or Vidura, was unsatisfied with them, and he left the palace. As a devotee, Vidura showed by example that anywhere that Kṛṣṇa is not honored is a place unfit for human habitation. A devotee may be tolerant regarding his own interests, but he should not be tolerant when there is misbehavior toward the Lord or the Lord’s devotee. Here the word aghavān is very significant, for it indicates that the Kauravas, Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s sons, lost the war because of being sinful in disobeying the instructions of Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vidura, was the greatest friend and devotee of Kṛṣṇa, who gave up his elder brother along with his son who would not listen to Kṛṣṇa’s advice since he was an offender, and who was born of Vyāsa and consequently not less than him, Taking shelter of Kṛṣṇa with body, mind and words, he would approach the Lord’s devotees. After purifying himself by visiting many holy places, what did he inquire from Maitreya, living in Haridvāra, who knew about Kṛṣṇa? Please tell us the questions and answers that took place in the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya? Vidura rejected his elder brother along with his sons headed by Duryodhana. Anavaraḥ means “not less.” Virajāḥ means “purified of passion.” This was caused by visiting holy places. The holy places also became pure by association with him. Kuśāvarta is Haridvāra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.3

↗
ద్వైపాయనాదనవరో మహిత్వే తస్య దేహజ: । సర్వాత్మనా శ్రిత: కృష్ణం తత్పరాంశ్చాప్యనువ్రత: ॥ ౩ ॥
dvaipāyanād anavaro
[dvaipaayanaad anavaro]
mahitve tasya dehajaḥ
[mahitve tasya dehajah]
sarvātmanā śritaḥ kṛṣṇaṁ
[sarvaatmanaa shritah krishnam]
tat-parāṁś cāpy anuvrataḥ
[tat-paraamsh chaapy anuvratah]
dvaipāyanāt — from Vyāsadeva anavaraḥ — in no way inferior mahitve — in greatness tasya — his (Vyāsa’s) deha-jaḥ — born of his body sarva-ātmanā — with all his heart śritaḥ — took shelter kṛṣṇam — Lord Kṛṣṇa tat-parān — those devoted to Him ca — and api — also anuvrataḥ — followed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dvaipāyanād anavaro
dvaipāyanāt
from Vyāsadeva
anavaraḥ
in no way inferior
mahitve tasya dehajaḥ
mahitve
in greatness
tasya
his (Vyāsa’s)
deha-jaḥ
born of his body
sarvātmanā śritaḥ kṛṣṇaṁ
sarva-ātmanā
with all his heart
śritaḥ
took shelter
kṛṣṇam
Lord Kṛṣṇa
tat-parāṁś cāpy anuvrataḥ
tat-parān
those devoted to Him
ca
and
api
also
anuvrataḥ
followed.
Vidura was born from the body of Vedavyāsa and was not less than he. Thus he accepted the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa wholeheartedly and was attached to His devotees.

The history of Vidura is that he was born of a śūdra mother, but his seminal father was Vyāsadeva; thus he was not less than Vyāsadeva in any respect. Since he was born of a great father, who was supposed to be an incarnation of Nārāyaṇa and who composed all the Vedic literatures, Vidura was also a great personality. He accepted Kṛṣṇa as his worshipable Lord and followed His instructions wholeheartedly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vidura, was the greatest friend and devotee of Kṛṣṇa, who gave up his elder brother along with his son who would not listen to Kṛṣṇa’s advice since he was an offender, and who was born of Vyāsa and consequently not less than him, Taking shelter of Kṛṣṇa with body, mind and words, he would approach the Lord’s devotees. After purifying himself by visiting many holy places, what did he inquire from Maitreya, living in Haridvāra, who knew about Kṛṣṇa? Please tell us the questions and answers that took place in the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya? Vidura rejected his elder brother along with his sons headed by Duryodhana. Anavaraḥ means “not less.” Virajāḥ means “purified of passion.” This was caused by visiting holy places. The holy places also became pure by association with him. Kuśāvarta is Haridvāra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.4

↗
కిమన్వపృచ్ఛన్మైత్రేయం విరజాస్తీర్థసేవయా । ఉపగమ్య కుశావర్త ఆసీనం తత్త్వవిత్తమమ్ ॥ ౪ ॥
kim anvapṛcchan maitreyaṁ
[kim anvaprichchan maitreyam]
virajās tīrtha-sevayā
[virajaas teertha-sevayaa]
upagamya kuśāvarta
[upagamya kushaavarta]
āsīnaṁ tattva-vittamam
[aaseenam tattva-vittamam]
kim — what anvapṛcchat — inquired maitreyam — from the sage Maitreya virajāḥ — Vidura, who was without material contamination tīrtha-sevayā — by visiting sacred places upagamya — having met kuśāvarte — at Kuśāvarta (Haridvāra, or Hardwar) āsīnam — who was abiding tattva-vit-tamam — the foremost knower of the science of spiritual life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kim anvapṛcchan maitreyaṁ
kim
what
anvapṛcchat
inquired
maitreyam
from the sage Maitreya
virajās tīrtha-sevayā
virajāḥ
Vidura, who was without material contamination
tīrtha-sevayā
by visiting sacred places
upagamya kuśāvarta
upagamya
having met
kuśāvarte
at Kuśāvarta (Haridvāra, or Hardwar)
āsīnaṁ tattva-vittamam
āsīnam
who was abiding
tattva-vit-tamam
the foremost knower of the science of spiritual life.
Vidura was purified of all passion by wandering in sacred places, and at last he reached Hardwar, where he met the great sage who knew the science of spiritual life, and he inquired from him. Śaunaka Ṛṣi therefore asked: What more did Vidura inquire from Maitreya?

Here the words virajās tīrtha-sevayā refer to Vidura, who was completely cleansed of all contamination by traveling to places of pilgrimage. In India there are hundreds of sacred places of pilgrimage, of which Prayāga, Hardwar, Vṛndāvana and Rāmeśvaram are considered principal. After leaving his home, which was full of politics and diplomacy, Vidura wanted to purify himself by traveling to all the sacred places, which are so situated that anyone who goes there automatically becomes purified. This is especially true in Vṛndāvana; any person may go there, and even if he is sinful he will at once contact an atmosphere of spiritual life and will automatically chant the names of Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā. That we have actually seen and experienced. It is recommended in the śāstras that after retiring from active life and accepting the vānaprastha (retired) order, one should travel everywhere to places of pilgrimage in order to purify himself. Vidura completely discharged this duty, and at last he reached Kuśāvarta, or Hardwar, where the sage Maitreya was sitting.

Another significant point is that one must go to sacred places not only to take bath there but to search out great sages like Maitreya and take instructions from them. If one does not do so, his traveling to places of pilgrimage is simply a waste of time. Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura, a great ācārya of the Vaiṣṇava sect, has, for the present, forbidden us to go to such places of pilgrimage because in this age, the times having so changed, a sincere person may have a different impression on seeing the behavior of the present residents of the pilgrimage sites. He has recommended that instead of taking the trouble to travel to such places, one should concentrate his mind on Govinda, and that will help him. Of course, to concentrate one’s mind on Govinda in any place is a path meant for those who are the most spiritually advanced; it is not for ordinary persons. Ordinary persons may still derive benefit from traveling to holy places like Prayāga, Mathurā, Vṛndāvana and Hardwar.

It is recommended in this verse that one find a person who knows the science of God, or a tattva-vit. Tattva-vit means “one who knows the Absolute Truth.” There are many pseudotranscendentalists, even at places of pilgrimage. Such men are always present, and one has to be intelligent enough to find the actual person to be consulted; then one’s attempt to progress by traveling to different holy places will be successful. One has to be freed from all contamination, and at the same time he has to find a person who knows the science of Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa helps a sincere person; as stated in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta, guru-kṛṣṇa-prasāde: by the mercy of the spiritual master and Kṛṣṇa, one attains the path of salvation, devotional service. If one sincerely searches for spiritual salvation, then Kṛṣṇa, being situated in everyone’s heart, gives him the intelligence to find a suitable spiritual master. By the grace of a spiritual master like Maitreya, one gets the proper instruction and advances in his spiritual life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vidura, was the greatest friend and devotee of Kṛṣṇa, who gave up his elder brother along with his son who would not listen to Kṛṣṇa’s advice since he was an offender, and who was born of Vyāsa and consequently not less than him, Taking shelter of Kṛṣṇa with body, mind and words, he would approach the Lord’s devotees. After purifying himself by visiting many holy places, what did he inquire from Maitreya, living in Haridvāra, who knew about Kṛṣṇa? Please tell us the questions and answers that took place in the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya? Vidura rejected his elder brother along with his sons headed by Duryodhana. Anavaraḥ means “not less.” Virajāḥ means “purified of passion.” This was caused by visiting holy places. The holy places also became pure by association with him. Kuśāvarta is Haridvāra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.5

↗
తయో: సంవదతో: సూత ప్రవృత్తా హ్యమలా: కథా: । ఆపో గాఙ్గా ఇవాఘఘ్నీర్హరే: పాదామ్బుజాశ్రయా: ॥ ౫ ॥
tayoḥ saṁvadatoḥ sūta
[tayoh samvadatoh soota]
pravṛttā hy amalāḥ kathāḥ
[pravrittaa hy amalaah kathaah]
āpo gāṅgā ivāgha-ghnīr
[aapo gaangaa ivaagha-ghneer]
hareḥ pādāmbujāśrayāḥ
[hareh paadaambujaashrayaah]
tayoḥ — while the two (Maitreya and Vidura) saṁvadatoḥ — were conversing sūta — O Sūta pravṛttāḥ — arose hi — certainly amalāḥ — spotless kathāḥ — narrations āpaḥ — waters gāṅgāḥ — of the river Ganges iva — like agha-ghnīḥ — vanquishing all sins hareḥ — of the Lord pāda-ambuja — the lotus feet āśrayāḥ — taking shelter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayoḥ saṁvadatoḥ sūta
tayoḥ
while the two (Maitreya and Vidura)
saṁvadatoḥ
were conversing
sūta
O Sūta
pravṛttā hy amalāḥ kathāḥ
pravṛttāḥ
arose
hi
certainly
amalāḥ
spotless
kathāḥ
narrations
āpo gāṅgā ivāgha-ghnīr
āpaḥ
waters
gāṅgāḥ
of the river Ganges
iva
like
agha-ghnīḥ
vanquishing all sins
hareḥ pādāmbujāśrayāḥ
hareḥ
of the Lord
pāda-ambuja
the lotus feet
āśrayāḥ
taking shelter.
Śaunaka inquired about the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya: There must have been many narrations of the spotless pastimes of the Lord. The hearing of such narrations is exactly like bathing in the water of the Ganges, for it can free one from all sinful reactions.

The water of the Ganges is purified because it pours forth from the lotus feet of the Lord. Similarly, Bhagavad-gītā is as good as the water of the Ganges because it is spoken from the mouth of the Supreme Lord. So it is with any topic on the pastimes of the Lord or the characteristics of His transcendental activities. The Lord is absolute; there is no difference between His words, His perspiration or His pastimes. The water of the Ganges, the narrations of His pastimes and the words spoken by Him are all on the absolute platform, and thus taking shelter of any one of them is equally good. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has enunciated that anything in relationship with Kṛṣṇa is on the transcendental platform. If we can dovetail all our activities in relationship with Kṛṣṇa, then we do not stand on the material platform, but always on the spiritual platform.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The two must have spoken only pure topics of the Lord, which destroy sin like the water of the Gaṅgā which takes shelter of the Lord’s lotus feet. The topics are pure because both were devotees. The topics were thus devoid of any subject other than Kṛṣṇa and his devotees. The water of the Gaṅgā (gaṅgyaḥ) destroys sin.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.6

↗
తా న: కీర్తయ భద్రం తే కీర్తన్యోదారకర్మణ: । రసజ్ఞ: కో ను తృప్యేత హరిలీలామృతం పిబన్ ॥ ౬ ॥
tā naḥ kīrtaya bhadraṁ te
[taa nah keertaya bhadram te]
kīrtanyodāra-karmaṇaḥ
[keertanyodaara-karmanah]
rasajṣaḥ ko nu tṛpyeta
[rasajshah ko nu tripyeta]
hari-līlāmṛtaṁ piban
[hari-leelaamritam piban]
tāḥ — those talks naḥ — to us kīrtaya — narrate bhadram te — may all good come unto you kīrtanya — should be chanted udāra — liberal karmaṇaḥ — activities rasa-jṣaḥ — a devotee who can appreciate mellow tastes kaḥ — who nu — indeed tṛpyeta — would feel satisfied hari-līlā-amṛtam — the nectar of the pastimes of the Lord piban — drinking.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tā naḥ kīrtaya bhadraṁ te
tāḥ
those talks
naḥ
to us
kīrtaya
narrate
bhadram te
may all good come unto you
kīrtanyodāra-karmaṇaḥ
kīrtanya
should be chanted
udāra
liberal
karmaṇaḥ
activities
rasajṣaḥ ko nu tṛpyeta
rasa-jṣaḥ
a devotee who can appreciate mellow tastes
kaḥ
who
nu
indeed
tṛpyeta
would feel satisfied
hari-līlāmṛtaṁ piban
hari-līlā-amṛtam
the nectar of the pastimes of the Lord
piban
drinking.
O Sūta Gosvāmī, all good fortune to you! Please narrate the activities of the Lord, which are all magnanimous and worth glorifying. What sort of devotee can be satiated by hearing the nectarean pastimes of the Lord?

The narration of the pastimes of the Lord, which are always enacted on the transcendental platform, should be received with all respect by devotees. Those who are actually on the transcendental platform are never satiated by hearing the continuous narration of the pastimes of the Lord. For example, if any self-realized soul reads from Bhagavad-gītā, he will never feel satiated. The narrations of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam may be read thousands and thousands of times, and still, without fail, new aspects of the subject matter will be relished by the devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Sūta! All auspiciousness to you! Please sing to us the topics of the Lord’s activities which are worthy of being chanted. What relisher of rasa could be fully satisfied on drinking the nectar of the Lord’s pastimes? Out of great eagerness to hear, the sages give blessings to Sūta. Please chant the topics in which there are great pastimes of the Lord, or please chant the topics of the Lord who has great pastimes worthy of being praised.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.7

↗
ఏవముగ్రశ్రవా: పృష్ట ఋషిభిర్నైమిషాయనై: । భగవత్యర్పితాధ్యాత్మస్తానాహ శ్రూయతామితి ॥ ౭ ॥
evam ugraśravāḥ pṛṣṭa
[evam ugrashravaah prishta]
ṛṣibhir naimiṣāyanaiḥ
[rishibhir naimishaayanaih]
bhagavaty arpitādhyātmas
[bhagavaty arpitaadhyaatmas]
tān āha śrūyatām iti
[taan aaha shrooyataam iti]
evam — thus ugraśravāḥ — Sūta Gosvāmī pṛṣṭaḥ — being asked ṛṣibhiḥ — by the sages naimiṣa-ayanaiḥ — who were assembled in the forest of Naimiṣa bhagavati — unto the Lord arpita — dedicated adhyātmaḥ — his mind tān — to them āha — said śrūyatām — just hear iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evam ugraśravāḥ pṛṣṭa
evam
thus
ugraśravāḥ
Sūta Gosvāmī
pṛṣṭaḥ
being asked
ṛṣibhir naimiṣāyanaiḥ
ṛṣibhiḥ
by the sages
naimiṣa-ayanaiḥ
who were assembled in the forest of Naimiṣa
bhagavaty arpitādhyātmas
bhagavati
unto the Lord
arpita
dedicated
adhyātmaḥ
his mind
tān āha śrūyatām iti
tān
to them
āha
said
śrūyatām
just hear
iti
thus.
On being asked to speak by the great sages of Naimiṣāraṇya, the son of Romaharṣaṇa, Sūta Gosvāmī, whose mind was absorbed in the transcendental pastimes of the Lord, said: Please hear what I shall now speak.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When asked by the sages at Naimiṣāraṇya, Sūta, concentrating his mind on the Lord, then said, “Please listen.” Adhyātmam means mind.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.8

↗
సూత ఉవాచ హరేర్ధృతక్రోడతనో: స్వమాయయా నిశమ్య గోరుద్ధరణం రసాతలాత్ । లీలాం హిరణ్యాక్షమవజ్ఞయా హతం సఞ్జాతహర్షో మునిమాహ భారత: ॥ ౮ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
harer dhṛta-kroḍa-tanoḥ sva-māyayā
[harer dhrita-kroda-tanoh sva-maayayaa]
niśamya gor uddharaṇaṁ rasātalāt
[nishamya gor uddharanam rasaatalaat]
līlāṁ hiraṇyākṣam avajṣayā hataṁ
[leelaam hiranyaaksham avajshayaa hatam]
saṣjāta-harṣo munim āha bhārataḥ
[sashjaata-harsho munim aaha bhaaratah]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta said hareḥ — of the Lord dhṛta — who had assumed kroḍa — of a boar tanoḥ — body sva-māyayā — by His divine potency niśamya — having heard goḥ — of the earth uddharaṇam — uplifting rasātalāt — from the bottom of the ocean līlām — sport hiraṇyākṣam — the demon Hiraṇyākṣa avajṣayā — neglectfully hatam — killed saṣjāta-harṣaḥ — being overjoyed munim — to the sage (Maitreya) āha — said bhārataḥ — Vidura.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta said
harer dhṛta-kroḍa-tanoḥ sva-māyayā
hareḥ
of the Lord
dhṛta
who had assumed
kroḍa
of a boar
tanoḥ
body
sva-māyayā
by His divine potency
niśamya gor uddharaṇaṁ rasātalāt
niśamya
having heard
goḥ
of the earth
uddharaṇam
uplifting
rasātalāt
from the bottom of the ocean
līlāṁ hiraṇyākṣam avajṣayā hataṁ
līlām
sport
hiraṇyākṣam
the demon Hiraṇyākṣa
avajṣayā
neglectfully
hatam
killed
saṣjāta-harṣo munim āha bhārataḥ
saṣjāta-harṣaḥ
being overjoyed
munim
to the sage (Maitreya)
āha
said
bhārataḥ
Vidura.
Sūta Gosvāmī continued: Vidura, the descendant of Bharata, was delighted to hear the story of the Lord, who, having assumed by His own divine potency the form of a boar, had enacted the sport of lifting the earth from the bottom of the ocean and indifferently killing the demon Hiraṇyākṣa. Vidura then spoke to the sage as follows.

It is stated here that the Lord assumed the form of a boar by His own potency. His form is not actually the form of a conditioned soul. A conditioned soul is forced to accept a particular type of body by the higher authority of material laws, but here it is clearly said that the Lord was not forced to accept the form of a boar by the external power. In Bhagavad-gītā the same fact is confirmed: when the Lord descends to this earth, He assumes a form by His own internal potency. The form of the Lord, therefore, can never consist of material energy. The Māyāvāda version that when Brahman assumes a form the form is accepted from māyā is not acceptable, because although māyā is superior to the conditioned soul, she is not superior to the Supreme Personality of Godhead; she is under the control of the Supreme Godhead, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā. Māyā is under His superintendence; māyā cannot overcome the Lord. The Māyāvāda idea that the living entity is the Supreme Absolute Truth but has become covered by māyā is invalid, because māyā cannot be so great that it can cover the Supreme. The covering capacity can be employed on the part and parcel of Brahman, not on the Supreme Brahman.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: O sages! Hearing how Varāha lifted the earth from the Garbhodaka Ocean with complete sincerity and casually killed Hiraṇyākṣa, Vidura, with hairs standing on end, inquired from Maitreya. Sv-amāyayā means “with no deceit at all.” The Lord eternally is situated (dhṛta) in the form of the boar. Dhṛta belongs to the tud-ādi class of verbs and means “situated.” Go means “of the earth.” Bhārataḥ means Vidura.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.9

↗
విదుర ఉవాచ ప్రజాపతిపతి: సృష్ట్వా ప్రజాసర్గే ప్రజాపతీన్ । కిమారభత మే బ్రహ్మన్ ప్రబ్రూహ్యవ్యక్తమార్గవిత్ ॥ ౯ ॥
vidura uvāca
[vidura uvaacha]
prajāpati-patiḥ sṛṣṭvā
[prajaapati-patih srishtvaa]
prajā-sarge prajāpatīn
[prajaa-sarge prajaapateen]
kim ārabhata me brahman
[kim aarabhata me brahman]
prabrūhy avyakta-mārga-vit
[prabroohy avyakta-maarga-vit]
viduraḥ uvāca — Vidura said prajāpati-patiḥ — Lord Brahmā sṛṣṭvā — after creating prajā-sarge — for the purpose of creating living beings prajāpatīn — the Prajāpatis kim — what ārabhata — started me — to me brahman — O holy sage prabrūhi — tell avyakta-mārga-vit — knower of that which we do not know.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vidura uvāca
viduraḥ uvāca
Vidura said
prajāpati-patiḥ sṛṣṭvā
prajāpati-patiḥ
Lord Brahmā
sṛṣṭvā
after creating
prajā-sarge prajāpatīn
prajā-sarge
for the purpose of creating living beings
prajāpatīn
the Prajāpatis
kim ārabhata me brahman
kim
what
ārabhata
started
me
to me
brahman
O holy sage
prabrūhy avyakta-mārga-vit
prabrūhi
tell
avyakta-mārga-vit
knower of that which we do not know.
Vidura said: Since you know of matters inconceivable to us, tell me, O holy sage, what did Brahmā do to create living beings after evolving the Prajāpatis, the progenitors of living beings?

Significant here is the word avyakta-mārga-vit, “one who knows that which is beyond our perception.” To know matters beyond one’s perception, one has to learn from a superior authority in the line of disciplic succession. Just to know who is our father is beyond our perception. For that, the mother is the authority. Similarly, we have to understand everything beyond our perception from the authority who actually knows. The first avyakta-mārga-vit, or authority, is Brahmā, and the next authority in disciplic succession is Nārada. Maitreya Ṛṣi belongs to that disciplic succession, so he also is avyakta-mārga-vit. Anyone in the bona fide line of disciplic succession is avyakta-mārga-vit, a personality who knows that which is beyond ordinary perception.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vidura said: O brāhmaṇa! Knower of the truth about the Lord! Please tell me what Brahmā did after creating the Prajāpatis.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.10

↗
యే మరీచ్యాదయో విప్రా యస్తు స్వాయమ్భువో మను: । తే వై బ్రహ్మణ ఆదేశాత్కథమేతదభావయన్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
ye marīcy-ādayo viprā
[ye mareechy-aadayo vipraa]
yas tu svāyambhuvo manuḥ
[yas tu svaayambhuvo manuh]
te vai brahmaṇa ādeśāt
[te vai brahmana aadeshaat]
katham etad abhāvayan
[katham etad abhaavayan]
ye — those marīci-ādayaḥ — great sages headed by Marīci viprāḥ — brāhmaṇas yaḥ — who tu — indeed svāyambhuvaḥ manuḥ — and Svāyambhuva Manu te — they vai — indeed brahmaṇaḥ — of Lord Brahmā ādeśāt — by the order katham — how etat — this universe abhāvayan — evolved.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ye marīcy-ādayo viprā
ye
those
marīci-ādayaḥ
great sages headed by Marīci
viprāḥ
brāhmaṇas
yas tu svāyambhuvo manuḥ
yaḥ
who
tu
indeed
svāyambhuvaḥ manuḥ
and Svāyambhuva Manu
te vai brahmaṇa ādeśāt
te
they
vai
indeed
brahmaṇaḥ
of Lord Brahmā
ādeśāt
by the order
katham etad abhāvayan
katham
how
etat
this universe
abhāvayan
evolved.
Vidura inquired: How did the Prajāpatis [such progenitors of living entities as Marīci and Svāyambhuva Manu] create according to the instruction of Brahmā, and how did they evolve this manifested universe?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How did the brāhmaṇas headed by Marīci and Svāyambhuva Manu create the living beings according to the order of Brahmā? How did they create (abhāvayan) the universe?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.11

↗
సద్వితీయా: కిమసృజన్ స్వతన్త్రా ఉత కర్మసు । ఆహోస్విత్సంహతా: సర్వ ఇదం స్మ సమకల్పయన్ ॥ ౧౧ ॥
sa-dvitīyāḥ kim asṛjan
[sa-dviteeyaah kim asrijan]
svatantrā uta karmasu
[svatantraa uta karmasu]
āho svit saṁhatāḥ sarva
[aaho svit samhataah sarva]
idaṁ sma samakalpayan
[idam sma samakalpayan]
sa-dvitīyāḥ — with their wives kim — whether asṛjan — created sva-tantrāḥ — remaining independent uta — or karmasu — in their actions āho svit — or else saṁhatāḥ — jointly sarve — all the Prajāpatis idam — this sma samakalpayan — produced.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa-dvitīyāḥ kim asṛjan
sa-dvitīyāḥ
with their wives
kim
whether
asṛjan
created
svatantrā uta karmasu
sva-tantrāḥ
remaining independent
uta
or
karmasu
in their actions
āho svit saṁhatāḥ sarva
āho svit
or else
saṁhatāḥ
jointly
sarve
all the Prajāpatis
idaṁ sma samakalpayan
idam
this
sma samakalpayan
produced.
Did they evolve the creation in conjunction with their respective wives, did they remain independent in their action, or did they all jointly produce it?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How did they create along with their wives? Did they do this independently or together? Sadvitīyāḥ means “with their wives.” Did they do creation (karmaṣu) so without depending on others or did they do so depending on many others?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.12

↗
మైత్రేయ ఉవాచ దైవేన దుర్వితర్క్యేణ పరేణానిమిషేణ చ । జాతక్షోభాద్భగవతో మహానాసీద్ గుణత్రయాత్ ॥ ౧౨ ॥
maitreya uvāca
[maitreya uvaacha]
daivena durvitarkyeṇa
[daivena durvitarkyena]
pareṇānimiṣeṇa ca
[parenaanimishena cha]
jāta-kṣobhād bhagavato
[jaata-kshobhaad bhagavato]
mahān āsīd guṇa-trayāt
[mahaan aaseed guna-trayaat]
maitreyaḥ uvāca — Maitreya said daivena — by superior management known as destiny durvitarkyeṇa — beyond empiric speculation pareṇa — by Mahā-Viṣṇu animiṣeṇa — by the potency of eternal time ca — and jāta-kṣobhāt — the equilibrium was agitated bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead mahān — the total material elements (the mahat-tattva) āsīt — were produced guṇa-trayāt — from the three modes of nature.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maitreya uvāca
maitreyaḥ uvāca
Maitreya said
daivena durvitarkyeṇa
daivena
by superior management known as destiny
durvitarkyeṇa
beyond empiric speculation
pareṇānimiṣeṇa ca
pareṇa
by Mahā-Viṣṇu
animiṣeṇa
by the potency of eternal time
ca
and
jāta-kṣobhād bhagavato
jāta-kṣobhāt
the equilibrium was agitated
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
mahān āsīd guṇa-trayāt
mahān
the total material elements (the mahat-tattva)
āsīt
were produced
guṇa-trayāt
from the three modes of nature.
Maitreya said: When the equilibrium of the combination of the three modes of nature was agitated by the unseen activity of the living entity, by Mahā-Viṣṇu and by the force of time, the total material elements were produced.

The cause of the material creation is described here very lucidly. The first cause is daiva, or the destiny of the conditioned soul. The material creation exists for the conditioned soul who wanted to become a false lord for sense enjoyment. One cannot trace out the history of when the conditioned soul first desired to lord it over material nature, but in Vedic literature we always find that the material creation is meant for the sense enjoyment of the conditioned soul. There is a nice verse which says that the sum and substance of the conditioned soul’s sense enjoyment is that as soon as he forgets his primary duty, to render service to the Lord, he creates an atmosphere of sense enjoyment, which is called māyā; that is the cause of material creation.

Another word used here is durvitarkyeṇa. No one can argue about when and how the conditioned soul became desirous of sense enjoyment, but the cause is there. Material nature is an atmosphere meant only for the sense enjoyment of the conditioned soul, and it is created by the Personality of Godhead. It is mentioned here that in the beginning of the creation the material nature, or prakṛti, is agitated by the Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. There are three Viṣṇus mentioned. One is Mahā-Viṣṇu, another is Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, and the third is Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. The First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam discusses all these three Viṣṇus, and here also it is confirmed that Viṣṇu is the cause of creation. From Bhagavad-gītā also we learn that prakṛti begins to work and is still working under Kṛṣṇa’s, or Viṣṇu’s, glance of superintendence, but the Supreme Personality of Godhead is unchangeable. One should not mistakenly think that because the creation emanates from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He has therefore transformed into this material cosmic manifestation. He exists in His personal form always, but the cosmic manifestation takes place by His inconceivable potency. The workings of that energy are difficult to comprehend, but it is understood from Vedic literature that the conditioned soul creates his own destiny and is offered a particular body by the laws of nature under the superintendence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who always accompanies him as Paramātmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Maitreya said: The mahat-tattva arose from prakṛti made of three guṇas, by disturbance caused by time, the Lord, and the inexplicable karmas of the jīvas, through the Lord’s glance. In answer to the question about creation in verse 9, Maitreya answers by describing the secondary creation. Though this was already previously described, it is described in summary here for completing the narration. Daivena means “by the karmas of the jīvas.” The root of the karmas cannot be understood (durvitarkena). Prakṛti was disturbed by the karmas of the jīvas, the desire of the SupremeLord to create (parena), and time (animiṣeṇa). From this pradhāna arose the mahat-tattva. Bhagavataḥ means “by the glance of the lord.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.13

↗
రజ:ప్రధానాన్మహతస్త్రిలిఙ్గో దైవచోదితాత్ । జాత: ససర్జ భూతాదిర్వియదాదీని పఞ్చశ: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
rajaḥ-pradhānān mahatas
[rajah-pradhaanaan mahatas]
tri-liṅgo daiva-coditāt
[tri-lingo daiva-choditaat]
jātaḥ sasarja bhūtādir
[jaatah sasarja bhootaadir]
viyad-ādīni paṣcaśaḥ
[viyad-aadeeni pashchashah]
rajaḥ-pradhānāt — in which the element of rajas, or passion, predominates mahataḥ — from the mahat-tattva tri-liṅgaḥ — of three kinds daiva-coditāt — impelled by superior authority jātaḥ — was born sasarja — evolved bhūta-ādiḥ — the false ego (origin of the material elements) viyat — the ether ādīni — beginning with paṣcaśaḥ — in groups of five.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rajaḥ-pradhānān mahatas
rajaḥ-pradhānāt
in which the element of rajas, or passion, predominates
mahataḥ
from the mahat-tattva
tri-liṅgo daiva-coditāt
tri-liṅgaḥ
of three kinds
daiva-coditāt
impelled by superior authority
jātaḥ sasarja bhūtādir
jātaḥ
was born
sasarja
evolved
bhūta-ādiḥ
the false ego (origin of the material elements)
viyad-ādīni paṣcaśaḥ
viyat
the ether
ādīni
beginning with
paṣcaśaḥ
in groups of five.
As impelled by the destiny of the jīva, the false ego, which is of three kinds, evolved from the mahat-tattva, in which the element of rajas predominates. From the ego, in turn, evolved many groups of five principles.

The primordial matter, or prakṛti, material nature, consisting of three modes, generates four groups of five. The first group is called elementary and consists of earth, water, fire, air and ether. The second group of five is called tan-mātra, referring to the subtle elements (sense objects): sound, touch, form, taste and smell. The third group is the five sense organs for acquiring knowledge: eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin. The fourth group is the five working senses: speech, hands, feet, anus and genitals. Some say that there are five groups of five. One group is the sense objects, one is the five elements, one is the five sense organs for acquiring knowledge, another is the senses for working, and the fifth group is the five deities who control these divisions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From mahat-tattva in the mode of rajoguṇa, arose ahaṅkāra with its three guṇas by the instigation of the Lord. From this arose the five gross elements, the five tan-mātras, the five action and five knowledge senses and their devatās. Mahat-tattva is initially predominantly in sattva, but at the time of producing ahaṅkāra, it becomes predominated by rajas. This form of mahat-tattva is called sūtra. Ahaṅkāra (bhūtādiḥ) has three guṇas. Viyad-ādīni means gross elements, and then the subtle elements or tanmātras such as sound, the knowledge senses, the action senses, and their devatās, all in groups of five.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.14

↗
తాని చైకైకశ: స్రష్టుమసమర్థాని భౌతికమ్ । సంహత్య దైవయోగేన హైమమణ్డమవాసృజన్ ॥ ౧౪ ॥
tāni caikaikaśaḥ sraṣṭum
[taani chaikaikashah srashtum]
asamarthāni bhautikam
[asamarthaani bhautikam]
saṁhatya daiva-yogena
[samhatya daiva-yogena]
haimam aṇḍam avāsṛjan
[haimam andam avaasrijan]
tāni — those elements ca — and eka-ekaśaḥ — separately sraṣṭum — to produce asamarthāni — unable bhautikam — the material universe saṁhatya — having combined daiva-yogena — with the energy of the Supreme Lord haimam — shining like gold aṇḍam — globe avāsṛjan — produced.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāni caikaikaśaḥ sraṣṭum
tāni
those elements
ca
and
eka-ekaśaḥ
separately
sraṣṭum
to produce
asamarthāni bhautikam
asamarthāni
unable
bhautikam
the material universe
saṁhatya daiva-yogena
saṁhatya
having combined
daiva-yogena
with the energy of the Supreme Lord
haimam aṇḍam avāsṛjan
haimam
shining like gold
aṇḍam
globe
avāsṛjan
produced.
Separately unable to produce the material universe, they combined with the help of the energy of the Supreme Lord and were able to produce a shining egg.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
These elements, which individually could not create, were combined together by the energy of the Lord, and created the golden egg of the universe. The elements joined together by the addition of the energy of the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.15

↗
సోఽశయిష్టాబ్ధిసలిలే ఆణ్డకోశో నిరాత్మక: । సాగ్రం వై వర్షసాహస్రమన్వవాత్సీత్తమీశ్వర: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
so ’śayiṣṭābdhi-salile
[so ’shayishtaabdhi-salile]
āṇḍakośo nirātmakaḥ
[aandakosho niraatmakah]
sāgraṁ vai varṣa-sāhasram
[saagram vai varsha-saahasram]
anvavātsīt tam īśvaraḥ
[anvavaatseet tam eeshvarah]
saḥ — it aśayiṣṭa — lay abdhi-salile — on the waters of the Causal Ocean āṇḍa-kośaḥ — egg nirātmakaḥ — in an unconscious state sāgram — a little more than vai — in fact varṣa-sāhasram — a thousand years anvavātsīt — became situated tam — in the egg īśvaraḥ — the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’śayiṣṭābdhi-salile
saḥ
it
āṇḍakośo nirātmakaḥ
sāgraṁ vai varṣa-sāhasram
aśayiṣṭa
lay
abdhi-salile
on the waters of the Causal Ocean
anvavātsīt tam īśvaraḥ
āṇḍa-kośaḥ
egg
nirātmakaḥ
in an unconscious state
sāgram
a little more than
vai
in fact
varṣa-sāhasram
a thousand years
anvavātsīt
became situated
tam
in the egg
īśvaraḥ
the Lord.
For over one thousand years the shiny egg lay on the waters of the Causal Ocean in the lifeless state. Then the Lord entered it as Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu.

From this verse it appears that all the universes are floating in the Causal Ocean.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The universe, without life, lay in the Kāraṇa Ocean for over a thousand years. Then the Lord inhabited it. The universe lay in the Kāraṇa Ocean without life, since the mass of jīvas had not woke up. For a little over (sāgram) a thousand years it lay there. After that (anu) the Lord, Garbodakaśāyī, dwelled in it.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.16

↗
తస్య నాభేరభూత్పద్మం సహస్రార్కోరుదీధితి । సర్వజీవనికాయౌకో యత్ర స్వయమభూత్స్వరాట్ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
tasya nābher abhūt padmaṁ
[tasya naabher abhoot padmam]
sahasrārkoru-dīdhiti
[sahasraarkoru-deedhiti]
sarva-jīvanikāyauko
[sarva-jeevanikaayauko]
yatra svayam abhūt svarāṭ
[yatra svayam abhoot svaraat]
tasya — of the Lord nābheḥ — from the navel abhūt — sprouted up padmam — a lotus sahasra-arka — a thousand suns uru — more dīdhiti — with dazzling splendor sarva — all jīva-nikāya — resting place of conditioned souls okaḥ — place yatra — where svayam — himself abhūt — emanated sva-rāṭ — the omnipotent (Lord Brahmā).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya nābher abhūt padmaṁ
tasya
of the Lord
nābheḥ
from the navel
abhūt
sprouted up
padmam
a lotus
sahasrārkoru-dīdhiti
sahasra-arka
a thousand suns
uru
more
dīdhiti
with dazzling splendor
sarva-jīvanikāyauko
sarva
all
jīva-nikāya
resting place of conditioned souls
okaḥ
place
yatra
where
yatra svayam abhūt svarāṭ
svayam
himself
abhūt
emanated
sva-rāṭ
the omnipotent (Lord Brahmā).
From the navel of the Personality of Godhead Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu sprouted a lotus flower effulgent like a thousand blazing suns. This lotus flower is the reservoir of all conditioned souls, and the first living entity who came out of the lotus flower was the omnipotent Brahmā

It appears from this verse that the conditioned souls who rested within the body of the Personality of Godhead after the dissolution of the last creation came out in the sum total form of the lotus. This is called hiraṇyagarbha. The first living entity to come out was Lord Brahmā, who is independently able to create the rest of the manifested universe. The lotus is described here as effulgent as the glare of a thousand suns. This indicates that the living entities, as parts and parcels of the Supreme Lord, are also of the same quality, since the Lord also diffuses His bodily glare, known as brahmajyoti. The description of Vaikuṇṭhaloka, as stated in Bhagavad-gītā and other Vedic literatures, is confirmed herewith. In Vaikuṇṭha, the spiritual sky, there is no need of sunshine, moonshine, electricity or fire. Every planet there is self-effulgent like the sun.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the navel of Viṣṇu arose a lotus, shining like a thousand suns, which was the abode of all the jīvas. In this lotus appeared Brahmā. From the navel (nabheḥ) arose the lotus. In the lotus (yatra) arose Brahmā (svarāṭ).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.17

↗
సోఽనువిష్టో భగవతా య: శేతే సలిలాశయే । లోకసంస్థాం యథాపూర్వం నిర్మమే సంస్థయా స్వయా ॥ ౧౭ ॥
so ’nuviṣṭo bhagavatā
[so ’nuvishto bhagavataa]
yaḥ śete salilāśaye
[yah shete salilaashaye]
loka-saṁsthāṁ yathā pūrvaṁ
[loka-samsthaam yathaa poorvam]
nirmame saṁsthayā svayā
[nirmame samsthayaa svayaa]
saḥ — Lord Brahmā anuviṣṭaḥ — was entered bhagavatā — by the Lord yaḥ — who śete — sleeps salila-āśaye — on the Garbhodaka Ocean loka-saṁsthām — the universe yathā pūrvam — as previously nirmame — created saṁsthayā — by intelligence svayā — his own.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’nuviṣṭo bhagavatā
yaḥ śete salilāśaye
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
anuviṣṭaḥ
was entered
bhagavatā
by the Lord
loka-saṁsthāṁ yathā pūrvaṁ
yaḥ
who
śete
sleeps
nirmame saṁsthayā svayā
salila-āśaye
on the Garbhodaka Ocean
loka-saṁsthām
the universe
yathā pūrvam
as previously
nirmame
created
saṁsthayā
by intelligence
svayā
his own.
When that Supreme Personality of Godhead who is lying on the Garbhodaka Ocean entered the heart of Brahmā, Brahmā brought his intelligence to bear, and with the intelligence invoked he began to create the universe as it was before.

At a certain time, the Personality of Godhead Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu lies in the Kāraṇa Ocean and produces many thousands of universes from His breathing; then He enters again into each and every universe as Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu and fills up half of each universe with His own perspiration. The other half of the universe remains vacant, and that vacant region is called outer space. Then the lotus flower sprouts from His abdomen and produces the first living creature, Brahmā. Then again, as Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, the Lord enters into the heart of every living entity, including Brahmā. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, Fifteenth Chapter. The Lord says, “I am seated in everyone’s heart, and by Me are remembrance and forgetfulness made possible.” As the witness of the activities of the individual entities, the Lord gives each one remembrance and intelligence to act according to his desire at the time he was annihilated in his last birth in the last millennium. This intelligence is invoked according to one’s own capacity, or by the law of karma.

Brahmā was the first living entity, and he was empowered by the Supreme Lord to act in charge of the mode of passion; therefore, he was given the required intelligence, which is so powerful and extensive that he is almost independent of the control of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Just as a highly posted manager is almost as independent as the owner of a firm, Brahmā is described here as independent because, as the Lord’s representative to control the universe, he is almost as powerful and independent as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord, as the Supersoul within Brahmā, gave him the intelligence to create. Therefore the creative power of every living entity is not his own; it is by the grace of the Lord that one can create. There are many scientists and great workers in this material world who have wonderful creative force, but they act and create only according to the direction of the Supreme Lord. A scientist may create many wonderful inventions by the direction of the Lord, but it is not possible for him to overcome the stringent laws of material nature by his intelligence, nor is it possible to acquire such intelligence from the Lord, for the Lord’s supremacy would then be hampered. It is stated in this verse that Brahmā created the universe as it was before. This means that he created everything by the same name and form as in the previous cosmic manifestation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As directed by Viṣṇu lying on the Garbhodaka Ocean, Brahmā created all the planets as previously with their names and forms. Regulated by the Lord, who was lying in the water, Brahmā created. Inspired by the Lord, he created the planets with proper arrangement (svayā saṁsthayā), with names and forms.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.18

↗
ససర్జ చ్ఛాయయావిద్యాం పఞ్చపర్వాణమగ్రత: । తామిస్రమన్ధతామిస్రం తమో మోహో మహాతమ: ॥ ౧౮ ॥
sasarja cchāyayāvidyāṁ
[sasarja chchaayayaavidyaam]
paṣca-parvāṇam agrataḥ
[pashcha-parvaanam agratah]
tāmisram andha-tāmisraṁ
[taamisram andha-taamisram]
tamo moho mahā-tamaḥ
[tamo moho mahaa-tamah]
sasarja — created chāyayā — with his shadow avidyām — ignorance paṣca-parvāṇam — five varieties agrataḥ — first of all tāmisram — tāmisra andha-tāmisram — andha-tāmisra tamaḥ — tamas mohaḥ — moha mahā-tamaḥ — mahā-tamas, or mahā-moha..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sasarja cchāyayāvidyāṁ
sasarja
created
chāyayā
with his shadow
avidyām
ignorance
paṣca-parvāṇam agrataḥ
paṣca-parvāṇam
five varieties
agrataḥ
first of all
tāmisram andha-tāmisraṁ
tāmisram
tāmisra
andha-tāmisram
andha-tāmisra
tamaḥ
tamas
tamo moho mahā-tamaḥ
mohaḥ
moha
mahā-tamaḥ
mahā-tamas, or mahā-moha..
First of all, Brahmā created from his shadow the coverings of ignorance of the conditioned souls. They are five in number and are called tāmisra, andha-tāmisra, tamas, moha and mahā-moha.

The conditioned souls, or living entities who come to the material world to enjoy sense gratification, are covered in the beginning by five different conditions. The first condition is a covering of tāmisra, or anger. Constitutionally, each and every living entity has minute independence; it is misuse of that minute independence for the conditioned soul to think that he can also enjoy like the Supreme Lord or to think, “Why shall I not be a free enjoyer like the Supreme Lord?” This forgetfulness of his constitutional position is due to anger or envy. The living entity, being eternally a part-and-parcel servitor of the Supreme Lord, can never, by constitution, be an equal enjoyer with the Lord. When he forgets this, however, and tries to be one with Him, his condition is called tāmisra. Even in the field of spiritual realization, this tāmisra mentality of the living entity is hard to overcome. In trying to get out of the entanglement of material life, there are many who want to be one with the Supreme. Even in their transcendental activities, this lower-grade mentality of tāmisra continues.

Andha-tāmisra involves considering death to be the ultimate end. The atheists generally think that the body is the self and that everything is therefore ended with the end of the body. Thus they want to enjoy material life as far as possible during the existence of the body. Their theory is: “As long as you live, you should live prosperously. Never mind whether you commit all kinds of so-called sins. You must eat sumptuously. Beg, borrow and steal, and if you think that by stealing and borrowing you are being entangled in sinful activities for which you will have to pay, then just forget that misconception because after death everything is finished. No one is responsible for anything he does during his life.” This atheistic conception of life is killing human civilization, for it is without knowledge of the continuation of eternal life.

This andha-tāmisra ignorance is due to tamas. The condition of not knowing anything about the spirit soul is called tamas. This material world is also generally called tamas because ninety-nine percent of its living entities are ignorant of their identity as soul. Almost everyone is thinking that he is this body; he has no information of the spirit soul. Guided by this misconception, one always thinks, “This is my body, and anything in relationship with this body is mine.” For such misguided living entities, sex life is the background of material existence. Actually, the conditioned souls, in ignorance in this material world, are simply guided by sex life, and as soon as they get the opportunity for sex life, they become attached to so-called home, motherland, children, wealth and opulence. As these attachments increase, moha, or the illusion of the bodily concept of life, also increases. Thus the idea that “I am this body, and everything belonging to this body is mine” also increases, and as the whole world is put into moha, sectarian societies, families and nationalities are created, and they fight with one another. Mahā-moha means to be mad after material enjoyment. Especially in this Age of Kali, everyone is overwhelmed by the madness to accumulate paraphernalia for material enjoyment. These definitions are very nicely given in Viṣṇu Purāṇa, wherein it is said:

tamo ’viveko mohaḥ syād antaḥ-karaṇa-vibhramaḥ mahā-mohas tu vijṣeyo grāmya-bhoga-sukhaiṣaṇā

maraṇaṁ hy andha-tāmisraṁ tāmisraṁ krodha ucyate avidyā paṣca-parvaiṣā prādurbhūtā mahātmanaḥ

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
First Bramā created ignorance of five types by his shadow: tamas, moha mahātamas tāmisram, and andha-tāmisram. In creating the Yakṣas, Rākṣasas, devatās and humans, false identity must arise in the jīvas. Without ignorance this is not possible. Thus first the functions of ignorance appeared on their own, through Brahmā. Tamas is the original form of ignorance. This verse describes how Brahmā created them by tamas which took the form of a shadow. In succession, tamas, moha, mahāmoha, tāmsira and andh-tāmisra were created. Tamas means ignorance. Moha means egoism. Mahāmoha means attachment. Tāmisra means hatred. Andha-tāmisra means absorption in material pleasure.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.19

↗
విససర్జాత్మన: కాయం నాభినన్దంస్తమోమయమ్ । జగృహుర్యక్షరక్షాంసి రాత్రిం క్షుత్తృట్‌సముద్భవామ్ ॥ ౧౯ ॥
visasarjātmanaḥ kāyaṁ
[visasarjaatmanah kaayam]
nābhinandaṁs tamomayam
[naabhinandams tamomayam]
jagṛhur yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
[jagrihur yaksha-rakshaamsi]
rātriṁ kṣut-tṛṭ-samudbhavām
[raatrim kshut-trit-samudbhavaam]
visasarja — threw off ātmanaḥ — his own kāyam — body na — not abhinandan — being pleased tamaḥ-mayam — made of ignorance jagṛhuḥ — took possession yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi — the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas rātrim — night kṣut — hunger tṛṭ — thirst samudbhavām — the source.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
visasarjātmanaḥ kāyaṁ
visasarja
threw off
ātmanaḥ
his own
kāyam
body
nābhinandaṁs tamomayam
na
not
abhinandan
being pleased
tamaḥ-mayam
made of ignorance
jagṛhur yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
jagṛhuḥ
took possession
yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas
rātrim
night
kṣut
hunger
rātriṁ kṣut-tṛṭ-samudbhavām
tṛṭ
thirst
samudbhavām
the source.
Out of disgust, Brahmā threw off the body of ignorance, and taking this opportunity, Yakṣas and Rākṣasas sprang for possession of the body, which continued to exist in the form of night. Night is the source of hunger and thirst.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Not satisfied with his body which became full of ignorance, Brahmā gave up that body. This body transformed into night, which gives rise to hunger and thirst. Yakṣas and Rākṣasas respected the night. He was not pleased with the shadow body. “Ah! I have been covered with ignorance at the beginning of creation!” Criticizing himself, he gave up that body. That rejected body became night. The demons, who had arisen from Brahmā at that time, accepted the night. This means that avidyā and adharma, āvaraṇa and vikṣepa, are superior to the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas. Then Brahmā gave up that body which produced hunger and thirst. Śruti says sā tamisrābhavat: that became tamisra. When it says that Brahmā gave up his body, it means that he gave up the mentality of that body, since Brahmā lives for a hundred years. The sequence is as follows. (First tamas arose). Anger and the rest, the mentality arising from tamas, appeared in the mind of Brahmā. From that, the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas appeared. That mentality of tamas (when Brahmā rejected it) then became the night. The Yakṣas and Rākṣasas accepted it. Though Brahmā accepted and rejects different bodies by his power of yoga to carry out creation, this does not disrupt his life of a hundred years. Some also say that even the devatās like Indra accept and reject bodies for material enjoyment.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.20

↗
క్షుత్తృడ్భ్యాముపసృష్టాస్తే తం జగ్ధుమభిదుద్రువు: । మా రక్షతైనం జక్షధ్వమిత్యూచు: క్షుత్తృడర్దితా: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
kṣut-tṛḍbhyām upasṛṣṭās te
[kshut-tridbhyaam upasrishtaas te]
taṁ jagdhum abhidudruvuḥ
[tam jagdhum abhidudruvuh]
mā rakṣatainaṁ jakṣadhvam
[maa rakshatainam jakshadhvam]
ity ūcuḥ kṣut-tṛḍ-arditāḥ
[ity oochuh kshut-trid-arditaah]
kṣut-tṛḍbhyām — by hunger and thirst upasṛṣṭāḥ — were overcome te — the demons (Yakṣas and Rākṣasas) tam — Lord Brahmā jagdhum — to eat abhidudruvuḥ — ran toward mā — do not rakṣata — spare enam — him jakṣadhvam — eat iti — thus ūcuḥ — said kṣut-tṛṭ-arditāḥ — afflicted by hunger and thirst.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣut-tṛḍbhyām upasṛṣṭās te
kṣut-tṛḍbhyām
by hunger and thirst
upasṛṣṭāḥ
were overcome
te
the demons (Yakṣas and Rākṣasas)
taṁ jagdhum abhidudruvuḥ
tam
Lord Brahmā
jagdhum
to eat
abhidudruvuḥ
ran toward
mā rakṣatainaṁ jakṣadhvam
mā
do not
rakṣata
spare
enam
him
jakṣadhvam
eat
ity ūcuḥ kṣut-tṛḍ-arditāḥ
iti
thus
ūcuḥ
said
kṣut-tṛṭ-arditāḥ
afflicted by hunger and thirst.
Overpowered by hunger and thirst, they ran to devour Brahmā from all sides and cried, “Spare him not! Eat him up!”

The representatives of the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas still exist in some countries of the world. It is understood that such uncivilized men take pleasure in killing their own grandfathers and holding a “love feast” by roasting the bodies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Yakṣas and Rākṣasas, being afflicted with hunger and thirst, pursued Brahmā to devour him. Pained by hunger and thirst they said, “Do not protect him. Eat him!” They ran after Brahmā (tam) to eat him (jagdhum). Some said, “Do not protect him out of compassion. Eat him.” Jakṣ means to eat or to laugh.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.21

↗
దేవస్తానాహ సంవిగ్నో మా మాం జక్షత రక్షత । అహో మే యక్షరక్షాంసి ప్రజా యూయం బభూవిథ ॥ ౨౧ ॥
devas tān āha saṁvigno
[devas taan aaha samvigno]
mā māṁ jakṣata rakṣata
[maa maam jakshata rakshata]
aho me yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
[aho me yaksha-rakshaamsi]
prajā yūyaṁ babhūvitha
[prajaa yooyam babhoovitha]
devaḥ — Lord Brahmā tān — to them āha — said saṁvignaḥ — being anxious mā — do not mām — me jakṣata — eat rakṣata — protect aho — oh me — my yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi — O Yakṣas and Rākṣasas prajāḥ — sons yūyam — you babhūvitha — were born.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
devas tān āha saṁvigno
devaḥ
Lord Brahmā
tān
to them
āha
said
saṁvignaḥ
being anxious
mā māṁ jakṣata rakṣata
mā
do not
mām
me
jakṣata
eat
rakṣata
protect
aho me yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
aho
oh
me
my
yakṣa-rakṣāṁsi
O Yakṣas and Rākṣasas
prajā yūyaṁ babhūvitha
prajāḥ
sons
yūyam
you
babhūvitha
were born.
Brahmā, the head of the demigods, full of anxiety, asked them, “Do not eat me, but protect me. You are born from me and have become my sons. Therefore you are Yakṣas and Rākṣasas.”

The demons who were born from the body of Brahmā were called Yakṣas and Rākṣasas because some of them cried that Brahmā should be eaten and the others cried that he should not be protected. The ones who said that he should be eaten were called Yakṣas, and the ones who said that he should not be protected became Rākṣasas, man-eaters. The two, Yakṣas and Rākṣasas, are the original creation by Brahmā and are represented even until today in the uncivilized men who are scattered all over the universe. They are born of the mode of ignorance, and therefore, because of their behavior, they are called Rākṣasas, or man-eaters.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Frightened, Brahmā said, “O Yakṣas and Rākṣasas! You are my sons. Do not eat me. Protect me.” Devaḥ means Brahmā. Do you eat me but protect me. Aho indicates astonishment. O Yakṣas and Rākṣasas!
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.22

↗
దేవతా: ప్రభయా యా యా దీవ్యన్ ప్రముఖతోఽసృజత్ । తే అహార్షుర్దేవయన్తో విసృష్టాం తాం ప్రభామహ: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
devatāḥ prabhayā yā yā
[devataah prabhayaa yaa yaa]
dīvyan pramukhato ’sṛjat
[deevyan pramukhato ’srijat]
te ahārṣur devayanto
[te ahaarshur devayanto]
visṛṣṭāṁ tāṁ prabhām ahaḥ
[visrishtaam taam prabhaam ahah]
devatāḥ — the demigods prabhayā — with the glory of light yāḥ yāḥ — those who dīvyan — shining pramukhataḥ — chiefly asṛjat — created te — they ahārṣuḥ — took possession of devayantaḥ — being active visṛṣṭām — separated tām — that prabhām — effulgent form ahaḥ — daytime.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
devatāḥ prabhayā yā yā
devatāḥ
the demigods
prabhayā
with the glory of light
yāḥ yāḥ
those who
dīvyan pramukhato ’sṛjat
dīvyan
shining
pramukhataḥ
chiefly
asṛjat
created
te ahārṣur devayanto
te
they
ahārṣuḥ
took possession of
devayantaḥ
being active
visṛṣṭāṁ tāṁ prabhām ahaḥ
visṛṣṭām
separated
tām
that
prabhām
effulgent form
ahaḥ
daytime.
He then created the chief demigods, who were shining with the glory of goodness. He dropped before them the effulgent form of daytime, and the demigods sportingly took possession of it.

Demons were born from the creation of night, and the demigods were born from the creation of day. In other words, demons like the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas are born of the quality of ignorance, and demigods are born of the quality of goodness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Shining with his effulgence, Brahmā then created the chief devatās. The devatās accepted that effulgence which Brahmā gave up, and which became the day, and they played with it. Brahmā shone with an effulgent body composed of sattva. He created the chief devatās. Yāḥ refers to te. They accepted that effulgent body which he gave up, which took the form of the day. Why? They accepted the day in order to play with it. Just as the night resides with the Yakṣas and Rākṣasas, the day is the abode of the devatās. Jīva Gosvāmī says that div, belonging to the cur class of verbs, means “to wish for.” The devatās wished for or requested the day. Purity, the mentality of sattva appeared in the mind of Brahmā. From that the devatās appeared. That purity became the day. The devatās then accepted the day. That is the sequence.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.23

↗
దేవోఽదేవాఞ్జఘనత: సృజతి స్మాతిలోలుపాన్ । త ఏనం లోలుపతయా మైథునాయాభిపేదిరే ॥ ౨౩ ॥
devo ’devāṣ jaghanataḥ
[devo ’devaash jaghanatah]
sṛjati smātilolupān
[srijati smaatilolupaan]
ta enaṁ lolupatayā
[ta enam lolupatayaa]
maithunāyābhipedire
[maithunaayaabhipedire]
devaḥ — Lord Brahmā adevān — demons jaghanataḥ — from his buttocks sṛjati sma — gave birth ati-lolupān — excessively fond of sex te — they enam — Lord Brahmā lolupatayā — with lust maithunāya — for copulation abhipedire — approached.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
devo ’devāṣ jaghanataḥ
devaḥ
Lord Brahmā
adevān
demons
jaghanataḥ
from his buttocks
sṛjati smātilolupān
sṛjati sma
gave birth
ati-lolupān
excessively fond of sex
te
they
ta enaṁ lolupatayā
enam
Lord Brahmā
lolupatayā
with lust
maithunāyābhipedire
maithunāya
for copulation
abhipedire
approached.
Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation.

Sex life is the background of material existence. Here also it is repeated that demons are very fond of sex life. The more one is free from the desire for sex, the more he is promoted to the level of the demigods; the more one is inclined to enjoy sex, the more he is degraded to the level of demoniac life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā’ created the Daityas from his buttocks. They were lusty for women and, desiring sex, pursued Brahmā. Then in Brahmā’s mind lust, the mentality of rajas, appeared. From that the demons appeared. That mentality became the sandhyā. The demons accepted that sandhyā. Adevān refers to the demons. Śruti says sa jaghanād asurān asṛjata: he created the demons from his buttocks. From lust arises great evil: they pursued Brahmā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.24

↗
తతో హసన్ స భగవానసురైర్నిరపత్రపై: । అన్వీయమానస్తరసా క్రుద్ధో భీత: పరాపతత్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
tato hasan sa bhagavān
[tato hasan sa bhagavaan]
asurair nirapatrapaiḥ
[asurair nirapatrapaih]
anvīyamānas tarasā
[anveeyamaanas tarasaa]
kruddho bhītaḥ parāpatat
[kruddho bheetah paraapatat]
tataḥ — then hasan — laughing saḥ bhagavān — the worshipful Lord Brahmā asuraiḥ — by the demons nirapatrapaiḥ — shameless anvīyamānaḥ — being followed tarasā — in great haste kruddhaḥ — angry bhītaḥ — being afraid parāpatat — ran away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato hasan sa bhagavān
tataḥ
then
hasan
laughing
saḥ bhagavān
the worshipful Lord Brahmā
asurair nirapatrapaiḥ
asuraiḥ
by the demons
nirapatrapaiḥ
shameless
anvīyamānas tarasā
anvīyamānaḥ
being followed
tarasā
in great haste
kruddho bhītaḥ parāpatat
kruddhaḥ
angry
bhītaḥ
being afraid
parāpatat
ran away.
The worshipful Brahmā first laughed at their stupidity, but finding the shameless asuras close upon him, he grew indignant and ran in great haste out of fear.

Sexually inclined demons have no respect even for their father, and the best policy for a saintly father like Brahmā is to leave such demoniac sons.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā first laughed, and then, on being pursued by the shameless demons, he became angry. Becoming frightened, he fled. Parāpatat means “he fled.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.25

↗
స ఉపవ్రజ్య వరదం ప్రపన్నార్తిహరం హరిమ్ । అనుగ్రహాయ భక్తానామనురూపాత్మదర్శనమ్ ॥ ౨౫ ॥
sa upavrajya varadaṁ
[sa upavrajya varadam]
prapannārti-haraṁ harim
[prapannaarti-haram harim]
anugrahāya bhaktānām
[anugrahaaya bhaktaanaam]
anurūpātma-darśanam
[anuroopaatma-darshanam]
saḥ — Lord Brahmā upavrajya — approaching vara-dam — the bestower of all boons prapanna — of those taking shelter at His lotus feet ārti — distress haram — who dispels harim — Lord Śrī Hari anugrahāya — for showing mercy bhaktānām — to His devotees anurūpa — in suitable forms ātma-darśanam — who manifests Himself.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa upavrajya varadaṁ
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
upavrajya
approaching
vara-dam
the bestower of all boons
prapannārti-haraṁ harim
prapanna
of those taking shelter at His lotus feet
ārti
distress
haram
who dispels
harim
Lord Śrī Hari
anugrahāya bhaktānām
anugrahāya
for showing mercy
bhaktānām
to His devotees
anurūpātma-darśanam
anurūpa
in suitable forms
ātma-darśanam
who manifests Himself.
He approached the Personality of Godhead, who bestows all boons and who dispels the agony of His devotees and of those who take shelter of His lotus feet. He manifests His innumerable transcendental forms for the satisfaction of His devotees.

Here the words bhaktānām anurūpātma-darśanam mean that the Personality of Godhead manifests His multiforms according to the desires of the devotees. For example, Hanumānjī (Vajrāṅgajī) wanted to see the form of the Lord as the Personality of Godhead Rāmacandra, whereas other Vaiṣṇavas want to see the form of Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, and still other devotees want to see the Lord in the form of Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa. The Māyāvādī philosophers think that although all these forms are assumed by the Lord just as the devotees desire to see Him, actually He is impersonal. From Brahma-saṁhitā, however, we can understand that this is not so, for the Lord has multiforms. It is said in the Brahma-saṁhitā, advaitam acyutam. The Lord does not appear before the devotee because of the devotee’s imagination. Brahma-saṁhitā further explains that the Lord has innumerable forms: rāmādi-mūrtiṣu kalā-niyamena tiṣṭhan. He exists in millions and millions of forms. There are 8,400,000 spieces of living entities, but the incarnations of the Supreme Lord are innumerable. In the Bhāgavatam it is stated that as the waves in the sea cannot be counted but appear and disappear continually, the incarnations and forms of the Lord are innumerable. A devotee is attached to a particular form, and it is that form which he worships. We have just described the first appearance of the boar within this universe. There are innumerable universes, and somewhere or other the boar form is now existing. All the forms of the Lord are eternal. It is the devotee’s inclination to worship a particular form, and he engages in devotional service to that form. In a verse in the Rāmāyaṇa, Hanumān, the great devotee of Rāma, said, “I know that there is no difference between the Sītā-Rāma and Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but nevertheless, the form of Rāma and Sītā has absorbed my affection and love. Therefore I want to see the Lord in the forms of Rāma and Sītā.” Similarly, the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava loves the forms of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa, and Kṛṣṇa and Rukmiṇī at Dvārakā. The words bhaktānām anurūpātma-darśanam mean that the Lord is always pleased to favor the devotee in the particular form in which the devotee wants to worship and render service unto Him. In this verse it is stated that Brahmā approached Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This form of the Lord is Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. Whenever there is some trouble and Brahmā has to approach the Lord, he can approach Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, and it is the grace of the Lord that whenever Brahmā approaches about disturbances in the universe, the Lord gives him relief in so many ways.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He then approached the Supreme Lord, giver of benedictions, who removes suffering from the surrendered souls, and who reveals himself according to the devotee’s desire to give them mercy. Brahmā mentally approached the Lord and then made a request. This is understood but not stated.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.26

↗
పాహి మాం పరమాత్మంస్తే ప్రేషణేనాసృజం ప్రజా: । తా ఇమా యభితుం పాపా ఉపాక్రామన్తి మాం ప్రభో ॥ ౨౬ ॥
pāhi māṁ paramātmaṁs te
[paahi maam paramaatmams te]
preṣaṇenāsṛjaṁ prajāḥ
[preshanenaasrijam prajaah]
tā imā yabhituṁ pāpā
[taa imaa yabhitum paapaa]
upākrāmanti māṁ prabho
[upaakraamanti maam prabho]
pāhi — protect mām — me parama-ātman — O Supreme Lord te — Your preṣaṇena — by order asṛjam — I created prajāḥ — living beings tāḥ imāḥ — those very persons yabhitum — to have sex pāpāḥ — sinful beings upākrāmanti — are approaching mām — me prabho — O Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pāhi māṁ paramātmaṁs te
pāhi
protect
mām
me
parama-ātman
O Supreme Lord
te
Your
preṣaṇenāsṛjaṁ prajāḥ
preṣaṇena
by order
asṛjam
I created
prajāḥ
living beings
tā imā yabhituṁ pāpā
tāḥ imāḥ
those very persons
yabhitum
to have sex
pāpāḥ
sinful beings
upākrāmanti māṁ prabho
upākrāmanti
are approaching
mām
me
prabho
O Lord.
Lord Brahmā, approaching the Lord, addressed Him thus: My Lord, please protect me from these sinful demons, who were created by me under Your order. They are infuriated by an appetite for sex and have come to attack me.

It appears here that the homosexual appetite of males for each other is created in this episode of the creation of the demons by Brahmā. In other words, the homosexual appetite of a man for another man is demoniac and is not for any sane male in the ordinary course of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O supreme soul! O Lord! By your order I created the offspring. These sinful beings are chasing me for sex. Please protect me! They desire sex even though I am a male.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.27

↗
త్వమేక: కిల లోకానాం క్లిష్టానాం క్లేశనాశన: । త్వమేక: క్లేశదస్తేషామనాసన్నపదాం తవ ॥ ౨౭ ॥
tvam ekaḥ kila lokānāṁ
[tvam ekah kila lokaanaam]
kliṣṭānāṁ kleśa-nāśanaḥ
[klishtaanaam klesha-naashanah]
tvam ekaḥ kleśadas teṣām
[tvam ekah kleshadas teshaam]
anāsanna-padāṁ tava
[anaasanna-padaam tava]
tvam — You ekaḥ — alone kila — indeed lokānām — of the people kliṣṭānām — afflicted with miseries kleśa — the distresses nāśanaḥ — relieving tvam ekaḥ — You alone kleśa-daḥ — inflicting distress teṣām — on those anāsanna — not taken shelter padām — feet tava — Your.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvam ekaḥ kila lokānāṁ
tvam
You
ekaḥ
alone
kila
indeed
lokānām
of the people
kliṣṭānāṁ kleśa-nāśanaḥ
kliṣṭānām
afflicted with miseries
kleśa
the distresses
nāśanaḥ
relieving
tvam ekaḥ kleśadas teṣām
tvam ekaḥ
You alone
kleśa-daḥ
inflicting distress
teṣām
on those
anāsanna-padāṁ tava
anāsanna
not taken shelter
padām
feet
tava
Your.
My Lord, You are the only one capable of ending the affliction of the distressed and inflicting agony on those who never resort to Your feet.

The words kleśadas teṣām anāsanna-padāṁ tava indicate that the Lord has two concerns. The first is to give protection to persons who take shelter of His lotus feet, and the second is to give trouble to those who are always demoniac and who are inimical toward the Lord. Māyā’s function is to give afflictions to the nondevotees. Here Brahmā said, “You are the protector of the surrendered souls; therefore I surrender unto Your lotus feet. Please give me protection from these demons.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! You alone are the remover of suffering for devotees who suffer. You alone give suffering to those who do not take shelter of your lotus feet. You give suffering to the non-devotees, those who do not take shelter of your feet. This implies “You destroy the suffering of the devotees, those who take shelter of your feet.” You alone (ekaḥ) have this nature of being affectionate to your devotees. Others do not have this nature. You alone give suffering to those who do not take shelter of your feet in the form of time, karma and malefic planets. But if they take shelter of your feet suddenly, you immediately destroy their suffering. This means that the devotees are not subject to time and karma. You do not treat the jīvas unequally, since you are like a desire tree.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.28

↗
సోఽవధార్యాస్య కార్పణ్యం వివిక్తాధ్యాత్మదర్శన: । విముఞ్చాత్మతనుం ఘోరామిత్యుక్తో విముమోచ హ ॥ ౨౮ ॥
so ’vadhāryāsya kārpaṇyaṁ
[so ’vadhaaryaasya kaarpanyam]
viviktādhyātma-darśanaḥ
[viviktaadhyaatma-darshanah]
vimuṣcātma-tanuṁ ghorām
[vimushchaatma-tanum ghoraam]
ity ukto vimumoca ha
[ity ukto vimumocha ha]
saḥ — the Supreme Lord, Hari avadhārya — perceiving asya — of Lord Brahmā kārpaṇyam — the distress vivikta — without a doubt adhyātma — minds of others darśanaḥ — one who can see vimuṣca — cast off ātma-tanum — your body ghorām — impure iti uktaḥ — thus commanded vimumoca ha — Lord Brahmā threw it off.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’vadhāryāsya kārpaṇyaṁ
viviktādhyātma-darśanaḥ
saḥ
the Supreme Lord, Hari
avadhārya
perceiving
asya
of Lord Brahmā
kārpaṇyam
the distress
vimuṣcātma-tanuṁ ghorām
vivikta
without a doubt
adhyātma
minds of others
darśanaḥ
one who can see
ity ukto vimumoca ha
vimuṣca
cast off
ātma-tanum
your body
ghorām
impure
iti uktaḥ
thus commanded
vimumoca ha
Lord Brahmā threw it off.
The Lord, who can distinctly see the minds of others, perceived Brahmā’s distress and said to him: “Cast off this impure body of yours.” Thus commanded by the Lord, Brahmā cast off his body.

The Lord is described here by the word viviktādhyātma-darśanaḥ. If anyone can completely perceive another’s distress without doubt, it is the Lord Himself. If someone is in distress and wants to get relief from his friend, sometimes it so happens that his friend does not appreciate the volume of distress he is suffering. But for the Supreme Lord it is not difficult. The Supreme Lord, as Paramātmā, is sitting within the heart of every living entity, and He directly perceives the exact causes of distress. In Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says, sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭaḥ: “I am sitting in everyone’s heart, and because of Me one’s remembrance and forgetfulness occur.” Thus whenever one fully surrenders unto the Supreme Lord, one finds that He is sitting within one’s heart. He can give us direction how to get out of dangers or how to approach Him in devotional service. The Lord, however, asked Brahmā to give up his present body because it had created the demoniac principle. According to Śrīdhara Svāmī, Brahmā’s constant dropping of his body does not refer to his actually giving up his body. Rather, he suggests that Brahmā gave up a particular mentality. Mind is the subtle body of the living entity. We may sometimes be absorbed in some thought which is sinful, but if we give up the sinful thought, it may be said that we give up the body. Brahmā’s mind was not in correct order when he created the demons. It must have been full of passion because the entire creation was passionate; therefore such passionate sons were born. It follows that any father and mother should also be careful while begetting children. The mental condition of a child depends upon the mental status of his parents at the time he is conceived. According to the Vedic system, therefore, the garbhādhāna-saṁskāra, or the ceremony for giving birth to a child, is observed. Before begetting a child, one has to sanctify his perplexed mind. When the parents engage their minds in the lotus feet of the Lord and in such a state the child is born, naturally good devotee children come; when the society is full of such good population, there is no trouble from demoniac mentalities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, who knows for certain the hearts of all others, understanding the misery of Brahmā, said, “Give up your terrible body.” Brahmā then gave up that body. Viviktam means discriminating. The Lord has knowledge of others hearts very accurately (adhyātma-darśanam). Having told Brahmā to give up the body, Brahmā did so.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.29

↗
తాం క్‍వణచ్చరణామ్భోజాం మదవిహ్వలలోచనామ్ । కాఞ్చీకలాపవిలసద్దుకూలచ్ఛన్నరోధసమ్ ॥ ౨౯ ॥
tāṁ kvaṇac-caraṇāmbhojāṁ
[taam kvanach-charanaambhojaam]
mada-vihvala-locanām
[mada-vihvala-lochanaam]
kāṣcī-kalāpa-vilasad-
[kaashchee-kalaapa-vilasad-]
dukūla-cchanna-rodhasam
[dukoola-chchanna-rodhasam]
tām — that body kvaṇat — tinkling with ankle bells caraṇa-ambhojām — with lotus feet mada — intoxication vihvala — overwhelmed locanām — with eyes kāṣcī-kalāpa — with a girdle made of golden ornaments vilasat — shining dukūla — by fine cloth channa — covered rodhasam — having hips.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāṁ kvaṇac-caraṇāmbhojāṁ
tām
that body
kvaṇat
tinkling with ankle bells
caraṇa-ambhojām
with lotus feet
mada-vihvala-locanām
mada
intoxication
vihvala
overwhelmed
locanām
with eyes
kāṣcī-kalāpa-vilasad-
kāṣcī-kalāpa
with a girdle made of golden ornaments
vilasat
shining
dukūla-cchanna-rodhasam
dukūla
by fine cloth
channa
covered
rodhasam
having hips.
The body given up by Brahmā took the form of the evening twilight, when the day and night meet, a time which kindles passion. The asuras, who are passionate by nature, dominated as they are by the element of rajas, took it for a damsel, whose lotus feet resounded with the tinkling of anklets, whose eyes were wide with intoxication and whose hips were covered by fine cloth, over which shone a girdle.

As early morning is the period for spiritual cultivation, the beginning of evening is the period for passion. Demoniac men are generally very fond of sex enjoyment; therefore they very much appreciate the approach of evening. The demons took the approach of the evening twilight to be a beautiful woman, and they began to adore her in various ways. They imagined the twilight to be a very beautiful woman with tinkling bangles on her feet, a girdle on her hips, and beautiful breasts, and for their sexual satisfaction they imagined the appearance of this beautiful girl before them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The lusty demons imagined the twilight to be a woman and were delighted. They said, “The ankle bells on her feet are jingling. Her eyes quiver in intoxicating. Her hips are covered with fine cloth and a belt. Her breasts rub against each other, and are raised, without space between. Her nose and teeth are beautiful and her smile and glance are affectionate. Is she covering herself with the edge of her cloth out of shyness? The locks of her hair are black. In this way the demons became bewildered by the twilight whom they imaged was a woman. Verse 37 explains that this woman was imaginary. They took the twilight to be a woman. They imagined the sound of birds returning to their nests in the twilight to be the sound of the ankle bells. They imagined the clouds with specific shapes to be the woman’s feet, eyes, hips and breasts. This is suggested by the word payodhara, which means a cloud as well as a breast. The pink color of the sunset was her pink dress. Rodhas can mean the hips as well as a bank of clouds. Because of rubbing together the breasts became raised, without space between them. The disappearance of the clouds was her act of hiding in shyness. Her smile and glance were like a small amount of the sun’s rays. Her black hair extending from her head to her feet was a towering, black cloud. O Vidura (dharma)! The demons, thinking of (upalabhya) the twilight as a woman, became bewildered.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.30

↗
అన్యోన్యశ్లేషయోత్తుఙ్గనిరన్తరపయోధరామ్ । సునాసాం సుద్విజాం స్‍నిగ్ధహాసలీలావలోకనామ్ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
anyonya-śleṣayottuṅga-
[anyonya-shleshayottunga-]
nirantara-payodharām
[nirantara-payodharaam]
sunāsāṁ sudvijāṁ snigdha-
[sunaasaam sudvijaam snigdha-]
hāsa-līlāvalokanām
[haasa-leelaavalokanaam]
anyonya — to each other śleṣayā — because of clinging uttuṅga — raised nirantara — without intervening space payaḥ-dharām — breasts su-nāsām — shapely nose su-dvijām — beautiful teeth snigdha — lovely hāsa — smile līlā-avalokanām — sportful glance.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anyonya-śleṣayottuṅga-
anyonya
to each other
śleṣayā
because of clinging
uttuṅga
raised
nirantara-payodharām
nirantara
without intervening space
payaḥ-dharām
breasts
sunāsāṁ sudvijāṁ snigdha-
su-nāsām
shapely nose
su-dvijām
beautiful teeth
snigdha
lovely
hāsa-līlāvalokanām
hāsa
smile
līlā-avalokanām
sportful glance.
Her breasts projected upward because of their clinging to each other, and they were too contiguous to admit any intervening space. She had a shapely nose and beautiful teeth, a lovely smile played on her lips, and she cast a sportful glance at the asuras.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The lusty demons imagined the twilight to be a woman and were delighted. They said, “The ankle bells on her feet are jingling. Her eyes quiver in intoxicating. Her hips are covered with fine cloth and a belt. Her breasts rub against each other, and are raised, without space between. Her nose and teeth are beautiful and her smile and glance are affectionate. Is she covering herself with the edge of her cloth out of shyness? The locks of her hair are black. In this way the demons became bewildered by the twilight whom they imaged was a woman. Verse 37 explains that this woman was imaginary. They took the twilight to be a woman. They imagined the sound of birds returning to their nests in the twilight to be the sound of the ankle bells. They imagined the clouds with specific shapes to be the woman’s feet, eyes, hips and breasts. This is suggested by the word payodhara, which means a cloud as well as a breast. The pink color of the sunset was her pink dress. Rodhas can mean the hips as well as a bank of clouds. Because of rubbing together the breasts became raised, without space between them. The disappearance of the clouds was her act of hiding in shyness. Her smile and glance were like a small amount of the sun’s rays. Her black hair extending from her head to her feet was a towering, black cloud. O Vidura (dharma)! The demons, thinking of (upalabhya) the twilight as a woman, became bewildered.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.31

↗
గూహన్తీం వ్రీడయాత్మానం నీలాలకవరూథినీమ్ । ఉపలభ్యాసురా ధర్మ సర్వే సమ్ముముహు: స్త్రియమ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
gūhantīṁ vrīḍayātmānaṁ
[goohanteem vreedayaatmaanam]
nīlālaka-varūthinīm
[neelaalaka-varoothineem]
upalabhyāsurā dharma
[upalabhyaasuraa dharma]
sarve sammumuhuḥ striyam
[sarve sammumuhuh striyam]
gūhantīm — hiding vrīḍayā — out of shyness ātmānam — herself nīla — dark alaka — hair varūthinīm — a bunch upalabhya — upon imagining asurāḥ — the demons dharma — O Vidura sarve — all sammumuhuḥ — were captivated striyam — woman.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gūhantīṁ vrīḍayātmānaṁ
gūhantīm
hiding
vrīḍayā
out of shyness
ātmānam
herself
nīlālaka-varūthinīm
nīla
dark
alaka
hair
varūthinīm
a bunch
upalabhyāsurā dharma
upalabhya
upon imagining
asurāḥ
the demons
dharma
O Vidura
sarve sammumuhuḥ striyam
sarve
all
sammumuhuḥ
were captivated
striyam
woman.
Adorned with dark tresses, she hid herself, as it were, out of shyness. Upon seeing that girl, the asuras were all infatuated with an appetite for sex.

The difference between demons and demigods is that a beautiful woman very easily attracts the minds of demons, but she cannot attract the mind of a godly person. A godly person is full of knowledge, and a demoniac person is full of ignorance. Just as a child is attracted by a beautiful doll, similarly a demon, who is less intelligent and full of ignorance, is attracted by material beauty and an appetite for sex. The godly person knows that this nicely dressed and ornamented attraction of high breasts, high hips, beautiful nose and fair complexion is māyā. All the beauty a woman can display is only a combination of flesh and blood. Śrī Śaṅkarācārya has advised all persons not to be attracted by the interaction of flesh and blood; they should be attracted by the real beauty In spiritual life. The real beauty is Kṛṣṇa and Rādhā. One who is attracted by the beauty of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa cannot be attracted by the false beauty of this material world. That is the difference between a demon and a godly person or devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The lusty demons imagined the twilight to be a woman and were delighted. They said, “The ankle bells on her feet are jingling. Her eyes quiver in intoxicating. Her hips are covered with fine cloth and a belt. Her breasts rub against each other, and are raised, without space between. Her nose and teeth are beautiful and her smile and glance are affectionate. Is she covering herself with the edge of her cloth out of shyness? The locks of her hair are black. In this way the demons became bewildered by the twilight whom they imaged was a woman. Verse 37 explains that this woman was imaginary. They took the twilight to be a woman. They imagined the sound of birds returning to their nests in the twilight to be the sound of the ankle bells. They imagined the clouds with specific shapes to be the woman’s feet, eyes, hips and breasts. This is suggested by the word payodhara, which means a cloud as well as a breast. The pink color of the sunset was her pink dress. Rodhas can mean the hips as well as a bank of clouds. Because of rubbing together the breasts became raised, without space between them. The disappearance of the clouds was her act of hiding in shyness. Her smile and glance were like a small amount of the sun’s rays. Her black hair extending from her head to her feet was a towering, black cloud. O Vidura (dharma)! The demons, thinking of (upalabhya) the twilight as a woman, became bewildered.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.32

↗
అహో రూపమహో ధైర్యమహో అస్యా నవం వయ: । మధ్యే కామయమానానామకామేవ విసర్పతి ॥ ౩౨ ॥
aho rūpam aho dhairyam
[aho roopam aho dhairyam]
aho asyā navaṁ vayaḥ
[aho asyaa navam vayah]
madhye kāmayamānānām
[madhye kaamayamaanaanaam]
akāmeva visarpati
[akaameva visarpati]
aho — oh rūpam — what beauty aho — oh dhairyam — what self-control aho — oh asyāḥ — her navam — budding vayaḥ — youth madhye — in the midst kāmayamānānām — of those passionately longing for akāmā — free from passion iva — like visarpati — walking with us.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho rūpam aho dhairyam
aho
oh
rūpam
what beauty
aho
oh
dhairyam
what self-control
aho asyā navaṁ vayaḥ
aho
oh
asyāḥ
her
navam
budding
vayaḥ
youth
madhye kāmayamānānām
madhye
in the midst
kāmayamānānām
of those passionately longing for
akāmeva visarpati
akāmā
free from passion
iva
like
visarpati
walking with us.
The demons praised her: Oh, what a beauty! What rare self-control! What a budding youth! In the midst of us all, who are passionately longing for her, she is moving about like one absolutely free from passion.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What a beautiful form! What astounding patience she has! What fresh youth she has! We all desire here but she moves among us as if detached. The demons talk under the influence of illusion created by lust.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.33

↗
వితర్కయన్తో బహుధా తాం సన్ధ్యాం ప్రమదాకృతిమ్ । అభిసమ్భావ్య విశ్రమ్భాత్పర్యపృచ్ఛన్ కుమేధస: ॥ ౩౩ ॥
vitarkayanto bahudhā
[vitarkayanto bahudhaa]
tāṁ sandhyāṁ pramadākṛtim
[taam sandhyaam pramadaakritim]
abhisambhāvya viśrambhāt
[abhisambhaavya vishrambhaat]
paryapṛcchan kumedhasaḥ
[paryaprichchan kumedhasah]
vitarkayantaḥ — indulging in speculations bahudhā — various kinds tām — her sandhyām — the evening twilight pramadā — a young woman ākṛtim — in the form of abhisambhāvya — treating with great respect viśrambhāt — fondly paryapṛcchan — questioned ku-medhasaḥ — wicked-minded.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vitarkayanto bahudhā
vitarkayantaḥ
indulging in speculations
bahudhā
various kinds
tāṁ sandhyāṁ pramadākṛtim
tām
her
sandhyām
the evening twilight
pramadā
a young woman
ākṛtim
in the form of
abhisambhāvya viśrambhāt
abhisambhāvya
treating with great respect
viśrambhāt
fondly
paryapṛcchan kumedhasaḥ
paryapṛcchan
questioned
ku-medhasaḥ
wicked-minded.
Indulging in various speculations about the evening twilight, which appeared to them endowed with the form of a young woman, the wicked-minded asuras treated her with respect and fondly spoke to her as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The foolish demons, thinking of the twilight as a woman, speculating about here, welcomed her and then with affection questioned her. Is she attracted to us or not? Is she a goddess or a human? Is she a prostitute or a woman of strict vows? In this way they speculated. They received her properly (abhisambhāvya).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.34

↗
కాసి కస్యాసి రమ్భోరు కో వార్థస్తేఽత్ర భామిని । రూపద్రవిణపణ్యేన దుర్భగాన్నో విబాధసే ॥ ౩౪ ॥
kāsi kasyāsi rambhoru
[kaasi kasyaasi rambhoru]
ko vārthas te ’tra bhāmini
[ko vaarthas te ’tra bhaamini]
rūpa-draviṇa-paṇyena
[roopa-dravina-panyena]
durbhagān no vibādhase
[durbhagaan no vibaadhase]
kā — who asi — are you kasya — belonging to whom asi — are you rambhoru — O pretty one kaḥ — what vā — or arthaḥ — object te — your atra — here bhāmini — O passionate lady rūpa — beauty draviṇa — priceless paṇyena — with the commodity durbhagān — unfortunate naḥ — us vibādhase — you tantalize.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāsi kasyāsi rambhoru
kā
who
asi
are you
kasya
belonging to whom
asi
are you
rambhoru
O pretty one
kaḥ
what
ko vārthas te ’tra bhāmini
vā
or
arthaḥ
object
te
your
atra
here
bhāmini
O passionate lady
rūpa-draviṇa-paṇyena
rūpa
beauty
draviṇa
priceless
paṇyena
with the commodity
durbhagān no vibādhase
durbhagān
unfortunate
naḥ
us
vibādhase
you tantalize.
Who are you, O pretty girl? Whose wife or daughter are you, and what can be the object of your appearing before us? Why do you tantalize us, unfortunate as we are, with the priceless commodity of your beauty?

The mentality of the demons in being enamored by the false beauty of this material world is expressed herein. The demoniac can pay any price for the skin beauty of this material world. They work very hard all day and night, but the purpose of their hard work is to enjoy sex life. Sometimes they misrepresent themselves as karma-yogīs, not knowing the meaning of the word yoga. Yoga means to link up with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or to act in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. A person who works very hard, no matter in what occupation, and who offers the result of the work to the service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, is called a karma-yogi.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O beautiful woman! Who are you? Whose daughter are you? Why are you in this place? Why do you torture us unfortunate beings by putting your priceless beauty for sale? Your beauty is a priceless artefact. It is to be sold, but instead you give us pain. We are unfortunate, and deserve to be your slaves. Binding us up, you desire to take us into your association. Or you give us pain, because you do not sell your beauty. Thus we are unfortunate.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.35

↗
యా వా కాచిత్త్వమబలే దిష్టయ‍ా సన్దర్శనం తవ । ఉత్సునోషీక్షమాణానాం కన్దుకక్రీడయా మన: ॥ ౩౫ ॥
yā vā kācit tvam abale
[yaa vaa kaachit tvam abale]
diṣṭyā sandarśanaṁ tava
[dishtyaa sandarshanam tava]
utsunoṣīkṣamāṇānāṁ
[utsunosheekshamaanaanaam]
kanduka-krīḍayā manaḥ
[kanduka-kreedayaa manah]
yā — whosoever vā — or kācit — anyone tvam — you abale — O beautiful girl diṣṭyā — by fortune sandarśanam — seeing tava — of you utsunoṣi — you agitate īkṣamāṇānām — of the onlookers kanduka — with a ball krīḍayā — by play manaḥ — the mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yā vā kācit tvam abale
yā
whosoever
vā
or
kācit
anyone
tvam
you
abale
O beautiful girl
diṣṭyā sandarśanaṁ tava
diṣṭyā
by fortune
sandarśanam
seeing
tava
of you
utsunoṣīkṣamāṇānāṁ
utsunoṣi
you agitate
īkṣamāṇānām
of the onlookers
kanduka-krīḍayā manaḥ
kanduka
with a ball
krīḍayā
by play
manaḥ
the mind.
Whosoever you may be, O beautiful girl, we are fortunate in being able to see you. While playing with a ball, you have agitated the minds of all onlookers.

Demons arrange many kinds of performances to see the glaring beauty of a beautiful woman. Here it is stated that they saw the girl playing with a ball. Sometimes the demoniac arrange for so-called sports, like tennis, with the opposite sex. The purpose of such sporting is to see the bodily construction of the beautiful girl and enjoy a subtle sex mentality. This demoniac sex mentality of material enjoyment is sometimes encouraged by so-called yogīs who encourage the public to enjoy sex life in different varieties and at the same time advertise that if one meditates on a certain manufactured mantra one can become God within six months. The public wants to be cheated, and Kṛṣṇa therefore creates such cheaters to misrepresent and delude. These so-called yogīs are actually enjoyers of the world garbed as yogīs. Bhagavad-gītā, however, recommends that if one wants to enjoy life, then it cannot be with these gross senses. A patient is advised by the experienced physician to refrain from ordinary enjoyment while in the diseased condition. A diseased person cannot enjoy anything; he has to restrain his enjoyment in order to get rid of the disease. Similarly, our material condition is a diseased condition. If one wants to enjoy real sense enjoyment, then one must get free of the entanglement of material existence. In spiritual life we can enjoy sense enjoyment which has no end. The difference between material and spiritual enjoyment is that material enjoyment is limited. Even if a man engages in material sex enjoyment, he cannot enjoy it for long. But when the sex enjoyment is given up, then one can enter spiritual life, which is unending. In the Bhāgavatam (5.5.1) it is stated that brahma-saukhya, spiritual happiness, is ananta, unending. Foolish creatures are enamored by the beauty of matter and think that the enjoyment it offers is real, but actually that is not real enjoyment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Whoever you are, we are fortunate to see you. But you agitate our minds by playing with a ball, while we watch. Utsunosi means “you agitate.” They imagined the ball of the setting sun to be red ball.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.36

↗
నైకత్ర తే జయతి శాలిని పాదపద్మం ఘ్నన్త్యా ముహు: కరతలేన పతత్పతఙ్గమ్ । మధ్యం విషీదతి బృహత్స్తనభారభీతం శాన్తేవ ద‍ృష్టిరమలా సుశిఖాసమూహ: ॥ ౩౬ ॥
naikatra te jayati śālini pāda-padmaṁ
[naikatra te jayati shaalini paada-padmam]
ghnantyā muhuḥ kara-talena patat-pataṅgam
[ghnantyaa muhuh kara-talena patat-patangam]
madhyaṁ viṣīdati bṛhat-stana-bhāra-bhītaṁ
[madhyam visheedati brihat-stana-bhaara-bheetam]
śānteva dṛṣṭir amalā suśikhā-samūhaḥ
[shaanteva drishtir amalaa sushikhaa-samoohah]
na — not ekatra — in one place te — your jayati — stay śālini — O beautiful woman pāda-padmam — lotus feet ghnantyāḥ — striking muhuḥ — again and again kara-talena — by the palm of the hand patat — bouncing pataṅgam — the ball madhyam — waist viṣīdati — gets fatigued bṛhat — full grown stana — of your breasts bhāra — by the weight bhītam — oppressed śāntā iva — as if fatigued dṛṣṭiḥ — vision amalā — clear su — beautiful śikhā — your hair samūhaḥ — bunch.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naikatra te jayati śālini pāda-padmaṁ
na
not
ekatra
in one place
te
your
jayati
stay
śālini
O beautiful woman
pāda-padmam
lotus feet
ghnantyā muhuḥ kara-talena patat-pataṅgam
ghnantyāḥ
striking
muhuḥ
again and again
kara-talena
by the palm of the hand
patat
bouncing
pataṅgam
the ball
madhyaṁ viṣīdati bṛhat-stana-bhāra-bhītaṁ
madhyam
waist
viṣīdati
gets fatigued
bṛhat
full grown
stana
of your breasts
bhāra
by the weight
bhītam
oppressed
śānteva dṛṣṭir amalā suśikhā-samūhaḥ
śāntā iva
as if fatigued
dṛṣṭiḥ
vision
amalā
clear
su
beautiful
śikhā
your hair
samūhaḥ
bunch.
O beautiful woman, when you strike the bouncing ball against the ground with your hand again and again, your lotus feet do not stay in one place. Oppressed by the weight of your full-grown breasts, your waist becomes fatigued, and your clear vision grows dull, as it were. Pray braid your comely hair.

The demons observed beautiful gestures in the woman’s every step. Here they praise her full-grown breasts, her scattered hair and her movements in stepping forward and backward while playing with the ball. In every step they enjoy her womanly beauty, and while they enjoy her beauty their minds become agitated by sex desire. As moths at night surround a fire and are killed, so the demons become victims of the movements of the ball-like breasts of a beautiful woman. The scattered hair of a beautiful woman also afflicts the heart of a lusty demon.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O praiseworthy woman! You play by striking the bouncing ball with your hand again and again and, in doing so, your feet do not stay in one place. It seems you are tired with your thin waist fatigued, bent because of the weight of your breasts. Your glance is pure and languid, and your hair is beautiful. This verse describes her playing with a ball. O praiseworthy woman! Your feet do not remain still. Patatpataṅgam means a bouncing ball and the setting sun. Because your waist is thin, it appears to be getting weak with the weight of your breasts. Your glance is without desire (amala) though internally you have desire. It appears languid (śrāntā) because of playing ball. Your hair appears splendid, being bound up. Su can stand as an indeclinable meaning “beautifully.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.37

↗
ఇతి సాయన్తనీం సన్ధ్యామసురా: ప్రమదాయతీమ్ । ప్రలోభయన్తీం జగృహుర్మత్వా మూఢధియ: స్త్రియమ్ ॥ ౩౭ ॥
iti sāyantanīṁ sandhyām
[iti saayantaneem sandhyaam]
asurāḥ pramadāyatīm
[asuraah pramadaayateem]
pralobhayantīṁ jagṛhur
[pralobhayanteem jagrihur]
matvā mūḍha-dhiyaḥ striyam
[matvaa moodha-dhiyah striyam]
iti — in this way sāyantanīm — the evening sandhyām — twilight asurāḥ — the demons pramadāyatīm — behaving like a wanton woman pralobhayantīm — alluring jagṛhuḥ — seized matvā — thinking to be mūḍha-dhiyaḥ — unintelligent striyam — a woman.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti sāyantanīṁ sandhyām
iti
in this way
sāyantanīm
the evening
sandhyām
twilight
asurāḥ pramadāyatīm
asurāḥ
the demons
pramadāyatīm
behaving like a wanton woman
pralobhayantīṁ jagṛhur
pralobhayantīm
alluring
jagṛhuḥ
seized
matvā mūḍha-dhiyaḥ striyam
matvā
thinking to be
mūḍha-dhiyaḥ
unintelligent
striyam
a woman.
The asuras, clouded in their understanding, took the evening twilight to be a beautiful woman showing herself in her alluring form, and they seized her.

The asuras are described here as mūḍha-dhiyaḥ, meaning that they are captivated by ignorance, just like the ass. The demons were captivated by the false, glaring beauty of this material form, and thus they embraced her.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way the foolish demons accepted the twilight which stimulates lust to a woman of lusty conduct. They imagined the twilight to be a woman of lusty conduct.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.38

↗
ప్రహస్య భావగమ్భీరం జిఘ్రన్త్యాత్మానమాత్మనా । కాన్త్యా ససర్జ భగవాన్ గన్ధర్వాప్సరసాం గణాన్ ॥ ౩౮ ॥
prahasya bhāva-gambhīraṁ
[prahasya bhaava-gambheeram]
jighrantyātmānam ātmanā
[jighrantyaatmaanam aatmanaa]
kāntyā sasarja bhagavān
[kaantyaa sasarja bhagavaan]
gandharvāpsarasāṁ gaṇān
[gandharvaapsarasaam ganaan]
prahasya — smiling bhāva-gambhīram — with a deep purpose jighrantyā — understanding ātmānam — himself ātmanā — by himself kāntyā — by his loveliness sasarja — created bhagavān — the worshipful Lord Brahmā gandharva — the celestial musicians apsarasām — and of the heavenly dancing girls gaṇān — the hosts of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prahasya bhāva-gambhīraṁ
prahasya
smiling
bhāva-gambhīram
with a deep purpose
jighrantyātmānam ātmanā
jighrantyā
understanding
ātmānam
himself
ātmanā
by himself
kāntyā sasarja bhagavān
kāntyā
by his loveliness
sasarja
created
bhagavān
the worshipful Lord Brahmā
gandharvāpsarasāṁ gaṇān
gandharva
the celestial musicians
apsarasām
and of the heavenly dancing girls
gaṇān
the hosts of.
With a laugh full of deep significance, the worshipful Brahmā then evolved by his own loveliness, which seemed to enjoy itself by itself, the hosts of Gandharvas and Apsarās.

The musicians in the upper planetary systems are called Gandharvas, and the dancing girls are called Apsarās. After being attacked by the demons and evolving a form of a beautiful woman in the twilight, Brahmā next created Gandharvas and Apsarās. Music and dancing employed in sense gratification are to be accepted as demoniac, but the same music and dancing, when employed in glorifying the Supreme Lord as kīrtana, are transcendental, and they bring about a life completely fit for spiritual enjoyment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Smiling to reveal his inscrutable intention, Brahmā then created the Gandharvas and Apsarās by his beauty which he had relished. When Brahmā remembered beauty, the Gandharvas appeared and the beauty became moon light. The Gandharvas accepted the light. Because of the custom of identifying the beauty with the possessor of beauty, it is stated that his beauty smelled itself by itself (though Brahmā smelled). Smiling and smelling are signs of relishing his own beauty.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.39

↗
విససర్జ తనుం తాం వైజ్యోత్‍స్‍నాం కాన్తిమతీం ప్రియామ్ । త ఏవ చాదదు: ప్రీత్యా విశ్వావసుపురోగమా: ॥ ౩౯ ॥
visasarja tanuṁ tāṁ vai
[visasarja tanum taam vai]
jyotsnāṁ kāntimatīṁ priyām
[jyotsnaam kaantimateem priyaam]
ta eva cādaduḥ prītyā
[ta eva chaadaduh preetyaa]
viśvāvasu-purogamāḥ
[vishvaavasu-purogamaah]
visasarja — gave up tanum — form tām — that vai — in fact jyotsnām — moonlight kānti-matīm — shining priyām — beloved te — the Gandharvas eva — certainly ca — and ādaduḥ — took possession prītyā — gladly viśvāvasu-puraḥ-gamāḥ — headed by Viśvāvasu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
visasarja tanuṁ tāṁ vai
visasarja
gave up
tanum
form
tām
that
vai
in fact
jyotsnāṁ kāntimatīṁ priyām
jyotsnām
moonlight
kānti-matīm
shining
priyām
beloved
te
the Gandharvas
ta eva cādaduḥ prītyā
eva
certainly
ca
and
ādaduḥ
took possession
prītyā
gladly
viśvāvasu-purogamāḥ
viśvāvasu-puraḥ-gamāḥ
headed by Viśvāvasu.
After that, Brahmā gave up that shining and beloved form of moonlight. Viśvāvasu and other Gandharvas gladly took possession of it.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā gave up that body of beauty which became moon light, and the Gandharvas headed by Viśvāvasu accepted it
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.40

↗
సృష్ట్వా భూతపిశాచాంశ్చ భగవానాత్మతన్ద్రిణా । దిగ్వాససో ముక్తకేశాన్ వీక్ష్య చామీలయద్ ద‍ృశౌ ॥ ౪౦ ॥
sṛṣṭvā bhūta-piśācāṁś ca
[srishtvaa bhoota-pishaachaamsh cha]
bhagavān ātma-tandriṇā
[bhagavaan aatma-tandrinaa]
dig-vāsaso mukta-keśān
[dig-vaasaso mukta-keshaan]
vīkṣya cāmīlayad dṛśau
[veekshya chaameelayad drishau]
sṛṣṭvā — having created bhūta — ghosts piśācān — fiends ca — and bhagavān — Lord Brahmā ātma — his tandriṇā — from laziness dik-vāsasaḥ — naked mukta — disheveled keśān — hair vīkṣya — seeing ca — and amīlayat — closed dṛśau — two eyes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sṛṣṭvā bhūta-piśācāṁś ca
sṛṣṭvā
having created
bhūta
ghosts
piśācān
fiends
ca
and
bhagavān ātma-tandriṇā
bhagavān
Lord Brahmā
ātma
his
tandriṇā
from laziness
dig-vāsaso mukta-keśān
dik-vāsasaḥ
naked
mukta
disheveled
keśān
hair
vīkṣya cāmīlayad dṛśau
vīkṣya
seeing
ca
and
amīlayat
closed
dṛśau
two eyes.
The glorious Brahmā next evolved from his sloth the ghosts and fiends, but he closed his eyes when he saw them stand naked with their hair scattered.

Ghosts and mischievous hobgoblins are also the creation of Brahmā; they are not false. All of them are meant for putting the conditioned soul into various miseries. They are understood to be the creation of Brahmā under the direction of the Supreme Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Creating the Bhūtas and Piśācas from laziness, and seeing them naked and with loosened hair, Brahmā closed his eyes. One time Brahmā felt lazy. From that the Bhūtas and Piśācas appeared. That laziness became yawning and sleep. The Bhūtas accepted that. The effect of laziness (tandrā) is called tandri.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.41

↗
జగృహుస్తద్విసృష్టాం తాం జృమ్భణాఖ్యాం తనుం ప్రభో: । నిద్రామిన్ద్రియవిక్లేదో యయా భూతేషు ద‍ృశ్యతే । యేనోచ్ఛిష్టాన్ధర్షయన్తి తమున్మాదం ప్రచక్షతే ॥ ౪౧ ॥
jagṛhus tad-visṛṣṭāṁ tāṁ
[jagrihus tad-visrishtaam taam]
jṛmbhaṇākhyāṁ tanuṁ prabhoḥ
[jrimbhanaakhyaam tanum prabhoh]
nidrām indriya-vikledo
[nidraam indriya-vikledo]
yayā bhūteṣu dṛśyate
[yayaa bhooteshu drishyate]
yenocchiṣṭān dharṣayanti
[yenochchishtaan dharshayanti]
tam unmādaṁ pracakṣate
[tam unmaadam prachakshate]
jagṛhuḥ — took possession tat-visṛṣṭām — thrown off by him tām — that jṛmbhaṇa-ākhyām — known as yawning tanum — the body prabhoḥ — of Lord Brahmā nidrām — sleep indriya-vikledaḥ — drooling yayā — by which bhūteṣu — among the living beings dṛśyate — is observed yena — by which ucchiṣṭān — smeared with stool and urine dharṣayanti — bewilder tam — that unmādam — madness pracakṣate — is spoken of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jagṛhus tad-visṛṣṭāṁ tāṁ
jagṛhuḥ
took possession
tat-visṛṣṭām
thrown off by him
tām
that
jṛmbhaṇākhyāṁ tanuṁ prabhoḥ
jṛmbhaṇa-ākhyām
known as yawning
tanum
the body
prabhoḥ
of Lord Brahmā
nidrām indriya-vikledo
nidrām
sleep
indriya-vikledaḥ
drooling
yayā bhūteṣu dṛśyate
yayā
by which
bhūteṣu
among the living beings
dṛśyate
is observed
yenocchiṣṭān dharṣayanti
yena
by which
ucchiṣṭān
smeared with stool and urine
dharṣayanti
bewilder
tam unmādaṁ pracakṣate
tam
that
unmādam
madness
pracakṣate
is spoken of.
The ghosts and hobgoblins took possession of the body thrown off in the form of yawning by Brahmā, the creator of the living entities. This is also known as the sleep which causes drooling. The hobgoblins and ghosts attack men who are impure, and their attack is spoken of as insanity.

The disease of insanity or being haunted by ghosts takes place in an unclean state of existence. Here it is clearly stated that when a man is fast asleep and saliva flows from his mouth and he remains unclean, ghosts then take advantage of his unclean state and haunt his body. In other words, those who drool while sleeping are considered unclean and are subject to be haunted by ghosts or to go insane.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Brahmā gave up his body called laziness, the Bhūtas and Piśācas accepted it. O Vidura! That body in which the senses become contaminated is called sleep and by that contamination, Bhūtas attack the contaminated persons. That condition is called madness. By sleep moistening of the mouth and other senses takes place. By that, the Bhūtas attack contaminated persons. That attack is called madness. In others people are called mad when attacked by the Bhūtas.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.42

↗
ఊర్జస్వన్తం మన్యమాన ఆత్మానం భగవానజ: । సాధ్యాన్ గణాన్ పితృగణాన్ పరోక్షేణాసృజత్ప్రభు: ॥ ౪౨ ॥
ūrjasvantaṁ manyamāna
[oorjasvantam manyamaana]
ātmānaṁ bhagavān ajaḥ
[aatmaanam bhagavaan ajah]
sādhyān gaṇān pitṛ-gaṇān
[saadhyaan ganaan pitri-ganaan]
parokṣeṇāsṛjat prabhuḥ
[parokshenaasrijat prabhuh]
ūrjaḥ-vantam — full of energy manyamānaḥ — recognizing ātmānam — himself bhagavān — the most worshipful ajaḥ — Brahmā sādhyān — the demigods gaṇān — hosts pitṛ-gaṇān — and the Pitās parokṣeṇa — from his invisible form asṛjat — created prabhuḥ — the lord of beings.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ūrjasvantaṁ manyamāna
ūrjaḥ-vantam
full of energy
manyamānaḥ
recognizing
ātmānaṁ bhagavān ajaḥ
ātmānam
himself
bhagavān
the most worshipful
ajaḥ
Brahmā
sādhyān gaṇān pitṛ-gaṇān
sādhyān
the demigods
gaṇān
hosts
pitṛ-gaṇān
and the Pitās
parokṣeṇāsṛjat prabhuḥ
parokṣeṇa
from his invisible form
asṛjat
created
prabhuḥ
the lord of beings.
Recognizing himself to be full of desire and energy, the worshipful Brahmā, the creator of the living entities, evolved from his own invisible form, from his navel, the hosts of Sādhyas and Pitās.

The Sādhyas and Pitās are invisible forms of departed souls, and they are also created by Brahmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then Brahmā, thinking himself powerful, created the Sādhyas and then, by his invisibility, he created the Pitṛs. One time, Brahmā’s power and invisibility appeared. They became the Sādhyas and Pitṛs. Their oblations also appeared. This is explained in two verses. From his strength appeared the Sādhyas. From his invisibility appeared the Pitṛs.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.43

↗
త ఆత్మసర్గం తం కాయం పితర: ప్రతిపేదిరే । సాధ్యేభ్యశ్చ పితృభ్యశ్చ కవయో యద్వితన్వతే ॥ ౪౩ ॥
ta ātma-sargaṁ taṁ kāyaṁ
[ta aatma-sargam tam kaayam]
pitaraḥ pratipedire
[pitarah pratipedire]
sādhyebhyaś ca pitṛbhyaś ca
[saadhyebhyash cha pitribhyash cha]
kavayo yad vitanvate
[kavayo yad vitanvate]
te — they ātma-sargam — source of their existence tam — that kāyam — body pitaraḥ — the Pitās pratipedire — accepted sādhyebhyaḥ — to the Sādhyas ca — and pitṛbhyaḥ — to the Pitās ca — also kavayaḥ — those well versed in rituals yat — through which vitanvate — offer oblations.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ta ātma-sargaṁ taṁ kāyaṁ
pitaraḥ pratipedire
sādhyebhyaś ca pitṛbhyaś ca
kavayo yad vitanvate
te
they
ātma-sargam
source of their existence
tam
that
kāyam
body
pitaraḥ
the Pitās
pratipedire
accepted
sādhyebhyaḥ
to the Sādhyas
ca
and
pitṛbhyaḥ
to the Pitās
ca
also
kavayaḥ
those well versed in rituals
yat
through which
vitanvate
offer oblations.
The Pitās themselves took possession of the invisible body, the source of their existence. It is through the medium of this invisible body that those well versed in the rituals offer oblations to the Sādhyas and Pitās [in the form of their departed ancestors] on the occasion of śrāddha.

Śrāddha is a ritualistic performance observed by the followers of the Vedas. There is a yearly occasion of fifteen days when ritualistic religionists follow the principle of offering oblations to departed souls. Thus those fathers and ancestors who, by freaks of nature, might not have a gross body for material enjoyment can again gain such bodies due to the offering of śrāddha oblations by their descendants. The performance of śrāddha, or offering oblations with prasāda, is still current in India, especially at Gayā, where oblations are offered at the lotus feet of Viṣṇu in a celebrated temple. Because the Lord is thus pleased with the devotional service of the descendants, by His grace He liberates the condemned souls of forefathers who do not have gross bodies, and He favors them to again receive a gross body for development of spiritual advancement.

Unfortunately, by the influence of māyā, the conditioned soul employs the body he gets for sense gratification, forgetting that such an occupation may lead him to return to an invisible body. The devotee of the Lord, or one who is in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, however, does not need to perform such ritualistic ceremonies as śrāddha because he is always pleasing the Supreme Lord; therefore his fathers and ancestors who might have been in difficulty are automatically relieved. The vivid example is Prahlāda Mahārāja. Prahlāda Mahārāja requested Lord Nṛsiṁhadeva to deliver his sinful father, who had so many times offended the lotus feet of the Lord. The Lord replied that in a family where a Vaiṣṇava like Prahlāda is born, not only his father but his father’s father and their fathers — up to the fourteenth father back — are all automatically delivered. The conclusion, therefore, is that Kṛṣṇa consciousness is the sum total of all good work for the family, for society and for all living entities. In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta, the author says that a person fully conversant with Kṛṣṇa consciousness does not perform any rituals because he knows that simply by serving Kṛṣṇa in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness all rituals are automatically performed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Sādhyas and Pitṛs accepted those bodies, by which the wise make offerings to the Sādhyas and Pitṛs. They, the Sādhyas and the Pitrs, accepted the appropriate bodies. By these bodies, the wise offer havya to the Sādhyas and kavya to the Pitṛs with faith.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.44

↗
సిద్ధాన్ విద్యాధరాంశ్చైవ తిరోధానేన సోఽసృజత్ । తేభ్యోఽదదాత్తమాత్మానమన్తర్ధానాఖ్యమద్భుతమ్ ॥ ౪౪ ॥
siddhān vidyādharāṁś caiva
[siddhaan vidyaadharaamsh chaiva]
tirodhānena so ’sṛjat
[tirodhaanena so ’srijat]
tebhyo ’dadāt tam ātmānam
[tebhyo ’dadaat tam aatmaanam]
antardhānākhyam adbhutam
[antardhaanaakhyam adbhutam]
siddhān — the Siddhas vidyādharān — Vidyādharas ca eva — and also tirodhānena — by the faculty of remaining hidden from vision saḥ — Lord Brahmā asṛjat — created tebhyaḥ — to them adadāt — gave tam ātmānam — that form of his antardhāna-ākhyam — known as the Antardhāna adbhutam — wonderful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
siddhān vidyādharāṁś caiva
siddhān
the Siddhas
vidyādharān
Vidyādharas
ca eva
and also
tirodhānena so ’sṛjat
tirodhānena
by the faculty of remaining hidden from vision
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
asṛjat
created
tebhyo ’dadāt tam ātmānam
tebhyaḥ
to them
adadāt
gave
tam ātmānam
that form of his
antardhāna-ākhyam
known as the Antardhāna
antardhānākhyam adbhutam
adbhutam
wonderful.
Then Lord Brahmā, by his ability to be hidden from vision, created the Siddhas and Vidyādharas and gave them that wonderful form of his known as the Antardhāna.

Antardhāna means that these living creatures can be perceived to be present, but they cannot be seen by vision.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā produced the Siddhas and Vidyādharas by his disappearance. He gave them that body. One time, Brahmā disappeared. From that the Siddhas and Vidhādharas appeared.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.45

↗
స కిన్నరాన కిమ్పురుషాన్ ప్రత్యాత్మ్యేనాసృజత్ప్రభు: । మానయన్నాత్మనాత్మానమాత్మాభాసం విలోకయన్ ॥ ౪౫ ॥
sa kinnarān kimpuruṣān
[sa kinnaraan kimpurushaan]
pratyātmyenāsṛjat prabhuḥ
[pratyaatmyenaasrijat prabhuh]
mānayann ātmanātmānam
[maanayann aatmanaatmaanam]
ātmābhāsaṁ vilokayan
[aatmaabhaasam vilokayan]
saḥ — Lord Brahmā kinnarān — the Kinnaras kimpuruṣān — the Kimpuruṣas pratyātmyena — from his reflection (in water) asṛjat — created prabhuḥ — the lord of the living beings (Brahmā) mānayan — admiring ātmanā ātmānam — himself by himself ātma-ābhāsam — his reflection vilokayan — seeing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa kinnarān kimpuruṣān
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
kinnarān
the Kinnaras
kimpuruṣān
the Kimpuruṣas
pratyātmyenāsṛjat prabhuḥ
pratyātmyena
from his reflection (in water)
asṛjat
created
prabhuḥ
the lord of the living beings (Brahmā)
mānayann ātmanātmānam
mānayan
admiring
ātmanā ātmānam
himself by himself
ātma-ābhāsam
his reflection
ātmābhāsaṁ vilokayan
vilokayan
seeing.
One day, Brahmā, the creator of the living entities, beheld his own reflection in the water, and admiring himself, he evolved Kimpuruṣas as well as Kinnaras out of that reflection.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Looking at his reflection in a mirror and thinking it beautiful, he created the Kinnara and Kimpuruṣas from his reflection. His reflection appeared. From that the Kinnaras and Kimpuruṣas appeared. Pratyātmyena means reflection. He thought “I am beautiful” (ātmanā ātmānam mānayan). Ātmā-bhāsam means a mirror.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.46

↗
తే తు తజ్జగృహూ రూపం త్యక్తం యత్పరమేష్ఠినా । మిథునీభూయ గాయన్తస్తమేవోషసి కర్మభి: ॥ ౪౬ ॥
te tu taj jagṛhū rūpaṁ
[te tu taj jagrihoo roopam]
tyaktaṁ yat parameṣṭhinā
[tyaktam yat parameshthinaa]
mithunī-bhūya gāyantas
[mithunee-bhooya gaayantas]
tam evoṣasi karmabhiḥ
[tam evoshasi karmabhih]
te — they (the Kinnaras and Kimpuruṣas) tu — but tat — that jagṛhuḥ — took possession of rūpam — that shadowy form tyaktam — given up yat — which parameṣṭhinā — by Brahmā mithunī-bhūya — coming together with their spouses gāyantaḥ — praise in song tam — him eva — only uṣasi — at daybreak karmabhiḥ — with his exploits.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te tu taj jagṛhū rūpaṁ
te
they (the Kinnaras and Kimpuruṣas)
tu
but
tat
that
jagṛhuḥ
took possession of
rūpam
that shadowy form
tyaktaṁ yat parameṣṭhinā
tyaktam
given up
yat
which
parameṣṭhinā
by Brahmā
mithunī-bhūya gāyantas
mithunī-bhūya
coming together with their spouses
gāyantaḥ
praise in song
tam evoṣasi karmabhiḥ
tam
him
eva
only
uṣasi
at daybreak
karmabhiḥ
with his exploits.
The Kimpuruṣas and Kinnaras took possession of that shadowy form left by Brahmā. That is why they and their spouses sing his praises by recounting his exploits at every daybreak.

The time early in the morning, one and a half hours before sunrise, is called brāhma-muhūrta. During this brāhma-muhūrta, spiritual activities are recommended. Spiritual activities performed early in the morning have a greater effect than in any other part of the day.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
They accepted that body of reflection cast off by Brahmā. In couples, they praise Brahmā for his actions in the dawn. The reflection displayed men and women together. They accepted that reflection.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.47

↗
దేహేన వై భోగవతా శయానో బహుచిన్తయా । సర్గేఽనుపచితే క్రోధాదుత్ససర్జ హ తద్వపు: ॥ ౪౭ ॥
dehena vai bhogavatā
[dehena vai bhogavataa]
śayāno bahu-cintayā
[shayaano bahu-chintayaa]
sarge ’nupacite krodhād
[sarge ’nupachite krodhaad]
utsasarja ha tad vapuḥ
[utsasarja ha tad vapuh]
dehena — with his body vai — indeed bhogavatā — stretching out full length śayānaḥ — lying fully stretched bahu — great cintayā — with concern sarge — the creation anupacite — not proceeded krodhāt — out of anger utsasarja — gave up ha — in fact tat — that vapuḥ — body.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dehena vai bhogavatā
dehena
with his body
vai
indeed
bhogavatā
stretching out full length
śayāno bahu-cintayā
śayānaḥ
lying fully stretched
bahu
great
cintayā
with concern
sarge ’nupacite krodhād
sarge
the creation
anupacite
not proceeded
krodhāt
out of anger
utsasarja ha tad vapuḥ
utsasarja
gave up
ha
in fact
tat
that
vapuḥ
body.
Once Brahmā lay down with his body stretched at full length. He was very concerned that the work of creation had not proceeded apace, and in a sullen mood he gave up that body too.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing that the creation was not satisfactory, Brahmā lay down with limbs spread out, in a worried state. Then when anger appeared, he rejected that body. By his mind he rejected the body while lying down. That body became snakes. Bhogavatā means “spreading out his feet and other limbs” He was worried that the creation was not satisfactory. He thought, “How can I make the creation successful?” While thinking thus, he lost his power of discrimination. Then great anger appeared. After that he gave up that body.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.48

↗
యేఽహీయన్తాముత: కేశా అహయస్తేఽఙ్గ జజ్ఞిరే । సర్పా: ప్రసర్పత: క్రూరా నాగా భోగోరుకన్ధరా: ॥ ౪౮ ॥
ye ’hīyantāmutaḥ keśā
[ye ’heeyantaamutah keshaa]
ahayas te ’ṅga jajṣire
[ahayas te ’nga jajshire]
sarpāḥ prasarpataḥ krūrā
[sarpaah prasarpatah krooraa]
nāgā bhogoru-kandharāḥ
[naagaa bhogoru-kandharaah]
ye — which ahīyanta — dropped out amutaḥ — from that keśāḥ — hairs ahayaḥ — snakes te — they aṅga — O dear Vidura jajṣire — took birth as sarpāḥ — snakes prasarpataḥ — from the crawling body krūrāḥ — envious nāgāḥ — cobras bhoga — with hoods uru — big kandharāḥ — whose necks.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ye ’hīyantāmutaḥ keśā
ye
which
ahīyanta
dropped out
amutaḥ
from that
keśāḥ
hairs
ahayas te ’ṅga jajṣire
ahayaḥ
snakes
te
they
sarpāḥ prasarpataḥ krūrā
nāgā bhogoru-kandharāḥ
aṅga
O dear Vidura
jajṣire
took birth as
sarpāḥ
snakes
prasarpataḥ
from the crawling body
krūrāḥ
envious
nāgāḥ
cobras
bhoga
with hoods
uru
big
kandharāḥ
whose necks.
O dear Vidura, the hair that dropped from that body transformed into snakes, and even while the body crawled along with its hands and feet contracted, there sprang from it ferocious serpents and Nāgas with their hoods expanded.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The hair which fell from that rejected body became ahi, sarpa, and nāga with hoods, which are all cruel. From that body (amutaḥ) the hair which fell (ahi) became ahi or snakes. From that body, the hands and feet that fell off became sarpa, those which move on restricted feet. Since they have hoods and no hair, others are called nāga. They have wide shoulders because of their hoods. Because they have anger, they are all cruel. These are the different types of snakes.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.49

↗
స ఆత్మాన్ మన్యమాన: కృతకృత్యమివాత్మభూ: । తదా మనూన్ ససర్జాన్తే మనసా లోకభావనాన్ ॥ ౪౯ ॥
sa ātmānaṁ manyamānaḥ
[sa aatmaanam manyamaanah]
kṛta-kṛtyam ivātmabhūḥ
[krita-krityam ivaatmabhooh]
tadā manūn sasarjānte
[tadaa manoon sasarjaante]
manasā loka-bhāvanān
[manasaa loka-bhaavanaan]
saḥ — Lord Brahmā ātmānam — himself manyamānaḥ — considering kṛta-kṛtyam — had accomplished the object of life iva — as if ātmabhūḥ — born from the Supreme tadā — then manūn — the Manus sasarja — created ante — at the end manasā — from his mind loka — of the world bhāvanān — promoting the welfare.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa ātmānaṁ manyamānaḥ
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
ātmānam
himself
manyamānaḥ
considering
kṛta-kṛtyam ivātmabhūḥ
kṛta-kṛtyam
had accomplished the object of life
iva
as if
ātmabhūḥ
born from the Supreme
tadā manūn sasarjānte
tadā
then
manūn
the Manus
sasarja
created
ante
at the end
manasā loka-bhāvanān
manasā
from his mind
loka
of the world
bhāvanān
promoting the welfare.
One day Brahmā, the self-born, the first living creature, felt as if the object of his life had been accomplished. At that time he evolved from his mind the Manus, who promote the welfare activities of the universe.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thinking himself successful, finally Brahmā created by his mind Manu and others for increasing the population. When Brahmā desired to create a couple and became blissful, thinking that his creation was complete, the Manus appeared and took the form of humans for completing the creation. This is explained in two verses. Though Manus are mentioned here, at this time only Svāyambhuva Manu became visible. Others became visible at the appropriate time. The creation of the Manus took place last (ante). Therefore, the creation of the sages which will be described after this actually took place before the creation of Manu. In the Tenth, Twelfth and Twentieth Chapters sometimes the events are in proper sequence and sometimes some elements are omitted or put in a different order. The proper sequence of the creation is as follows: first creation of animals with five joints, then the creation of trees and plants, then the creation of snakes, then the creation of cows and buffalos, then the creation of Yakṣas, Rākṣasas, Asuras, Kinnaras, Kimpuruṣas, then the creation of the Kumāras and then the creation of the humans. Finally the Manus were created. All the forms previously created increased through the forms of male and female.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.50

↗
తేభ్య: సోఽసృజత్స్వీయం పురం పురుషమాత్మవాన్ । తాన్ దృష్ట్వా యే పురా సృష్టా: ప్రశశంసు: ప్రజాపతిమ్ ॥ ౫౦ ॥
tebhyaḥ so ’sṛjat svīyaṁ
[tebhyah so ’srijat sveeyam]
puraṁ puruṣam ātmavān
[puram purusham aatmavaan]
tān dṛṣṭvā ye purā sṛṣṭāḥ
[taan drishtvaa ye puraa srishtaah]
praśaśaṁsuḥ prajāpatim
[prashashamsuh prajaapatim]
tebhyaḥ — to them saḥ — Lord Brahmā asṛjat — gave svīyam — his own puram — body puruṣam — human ātma-vān — self-possessed tān — them dṛṣṭvā — on seeing ye — those who purā — earlier sṛṣṭāḥ — were created (the demigods, Gandharvas, etc., who were created earlier) praśaśaṁsuḥ — applauded prajāpatim — Brahmā (the lord of created beings).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tebhyaḥ so ’sṛjat svīyaṁ
tebhyaḥ
to them
puraṁ puruṣam ātmavān
saḥ
Lord Brahmā
tān dṛṣṭvā ye purā sṛṣṭāḥ
asṛjat
gave
svīyam
his own
puram
body
puruṣam
human
praśaśaṁsuḥ prajāpatim
ātma-vān
self-possessed
tān
them
dṛṣṭvā
on seeing
ye
those who
purā
earlier
sṛṣṭāḥ
were created (the demigods, Gandharvas, etc., who were created earlier)
praśaśaṁsuḥ
applauded
prajāpatim
Brahmā (the lord of created beings).
The self-possessed creator gave them his own human form. On seeing the Manus, those who had been created earlier — the demigods, the Gandharvas and so on — applauded Brahmā, the lord of the universe.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā gave to Manu his own human form. Those who were created previously glanced at Manu and began to praise Brahmā. Brahmā gave up that body (puram) in the form of a human, and Manu accepted it.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.51

↗
అహో ఏతజ్జగత్స్రష్ట: సుకృతం బత తే కృతమ్ । ప్రతిష్ఠితా: క్రియా యస్మిన్ సాకమన్నమదామహే ॥ ౫౧ ॥
aho etaj jagat-sraṣṭaḥ
[aho etaj jagat-srashtah]
sukṛtaṁ bata te kṛtam
[sukritam bata te kritam]
pratiṣṭhitāḥ kriyā yasmin
[pratishthitaah kriyaa yasmin]
sākam annam adāma he
[saakam annam adaama he]
aho — oh etat — this jagat-sraṣṭaḥ — O creator of the universe sukṛtam — well done bata — indeed te — by you kṛtam — produced pratiṣṭhitāḥ — established soundly kriyāḥ — all ritualistic performances yasmin — in which sākam — along with this annam — the sacrificial oblations adāma — we shall share he — O.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho etaj jagat-sraṣṭaḥ
aho
oh
etat
this
jagat-sraṣṭaḥ
O creator of the universe
sukṛtaṁ bata te kṛtam
sukṛtam
well done
bata
indeed
te
by you
kṛtam
produced
pratiṣṭhitāḥ kriyā yasmin
pratiṣṭhitāḥ
established soundly
kriyāḥ
all ritualistic performances
yasmin
in which
sākam annam adāma he
sākam
along with this
annam
the sacrificial oblations
adāma
we shall share
he
O.
They prayed: O creator of the universe, we are glad; what you have produced is well done. Since ritualistic acts have now been established soundly in this human form, we shall all share the sacrificial oblations.

The importance of sacrifice is also mentioned in Bhagavad-gītā, Third Chapter, verse 10. The Lord confirms there that in the beginning of creation Brahmā created the Manus, along with the ritualistic sacrificial method, and blessed them: “Continue these sacrificial rites, and you will be gradually elevated to your proper position of self-realization and will also enjoy material happiness.” All the living entities created by Brahmā are conditioned souls and are inclined to lord it over material nature. The purpose of sacrificial rituals is to revive, gradually, the spiritual realization of the living entities. That is the beginning of life within this universe. These sacrificial rituals, however, are intended to please the Supreme Lord. Unless one pleases the Supreme Lord, or unless one is Kṛṣṇa conscious, one cannot be happy either in material enjoyment or in spiritual realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Creator of the universe! You have done excellent work in creating Manu. By this, the sacrificial actions will be established and we will be able to eat the remnants of sacrifice together. O creator of the universe! Creation of Manu by you (te) is well done. In creating Manu (yat), actions such as sacrifice will be established, since Manu will protect everything. We will eat the offerings of food together (sākam).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.52

↗
తపసా విద్యయా యుక్తో యోగేన సుసమాధినా । ఋషీనృషిర్హృషీకేశ: ససర్జాభిమతా: ప్రజా: ॥ ౫౨ ॥
tapasā vidyayā yukto
[tapasaa vidyayaa yukto]
yogena susamādhinā
[yogena susamaadhinaa]
ṛṣīn ṛṣir hṛṣīkeśaḥ
[risheen rishir hrisheekeshah]
sasarjābhimatāḥ prajāḥ
[sasarjaabhimataah prajaah]
tapasā — by penance vidyayā — by worship yuktaḥ — being engaged yogena — by concentration of the mind in devotion su-samādhinā — by nice meditation ṛṣīn — the sages ṛṣiḥ — the first seer (Brahmā) hṛṣīkeśaḥ — the controller of his senses sasarja — created abhimatāḥ — beloved prajāḥ — sons.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tapasā vidyayā yukto
tapasā
by penance
vidyayā
by worship
yuktaḥ
being engaged
yogena susamādhinā
yogena
by concentration of the mind in devotion
su-samādhinā
by nice meditation
ṛṣīn ṛṣir hṛṣīkeśaḥ
ṛṣīn
the sages
ṛṣiḥ
the first seer (Brahmā)
hṛṣīkeśaḥ
the controller of his senses
sasarjābhimatāḥ prajāḥ
sasarja
created
abhimatāḥ
beloved
prajāḥ
sons.
Having equipped himself with austere penance, adoration, mental concentration and absorption in devotion, accompanied by dispassion, and having controlled his senses, Brahmā, the self-born living creature, evolved great sages as his beloved sons.

The ritualistic performances of sacrifice are meant for material economic development; in other words, they are meant to keep the body in good condition for cultivation of spiritual knowledge. But for actual attainment of spiritual knowledge, other qualifications are needed. What is essential is vidyā, or worship of the Supreme Lord. Sometimes the word yoga is used to refer to the gymnastic performances of different bodily postures which help mental concentration. Generally, the different bodily postures in the yoga system are accepted by less intelligent men to be the end of yoga, but actually they are meant to concentrate the mind upon the Supersoul. After creating persons for economic development, Brahmā created sages who would set the example for spiritual realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Endowed with austerity, worship, aṣṭāṅga-yoga, jṣāna and vairāgya, controlling his senses, Brahmā created the sages, his dear offspring. This describes Brahmā’s creation of the sages when he was engaged in worship. Vidyayā means “by worship.” Yogena means by aṣṭāṅga-yoga. Susamādhiṇā means “by jṣāna and vairāgya.” Controlling his senses, he created the sages such as the Kumāras.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.20.53

↗
తేభ్యశ్చైకైకశ: స్వస్య దేహస్యాంశమదాదజ: । యత్తత్సమాధియోగర్ద్ధితపోవిద్యావిరక్తిమత్ ॥ ౫౩ ॥
tebhyaś caikaikaśaḥ svasya
[tebhyash chaikaikashah svasya]
dehasyāṁśam adād ajaḥ
[dehasyaamsham adaad ajah]
yat tat samādhi-yogarddhi-
[yat tat samaadhi-yogarddhi-]
tapo-vidyā-viraktimat
[tapo-vidyaa-viraktimat]
tebhyaḥ — to them ca — and ekaikaśaḥ — each one svasya — of his own dehasya — body aṁśam — part adāt — gave ajaḥ — the unborn Brahmā yat — which tat — that samādhi — deep meditation yoga — concentration of the mind ṛddhi — supernatural power tapaḥ — austerity vidyā — knowledge virakti — renunciation mat — possessing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tebhyaś caikaikaśaḥ svasya
tebhyaḥ
to them
ca
and
ekaikaśaḥ
each one
svasya
of his own
dehasyāṁśam adād ajaḥ
dehasya
body
aṁśam
part
adāt
gave
ajaḥ
the unborn Brahmā
yat tat samādhi-yogarddhi-
yat
which
tat
that
samādhi
deep meditation
yoga
concentration of the mind
ṛddhi
supernatural power
tapo-vidyā-viraktimat
tapaḥ
austerity
vidyā
knowledge
virakti
renunciation
mat
possessing.
To each one of these sons the unborn creator of the universe gave a part of his own body, which was characterized by deep meditation, mental concentration, supernatural power, austerity, adoration and renunciation.

The word viraktimat in this verse means “possessed of the qualification of renunciation.” Spiritual realization cannot be attained by materialistic persons. For those who are addicted to sense enjoyment, spiritual realization is not possible. In Bhagavad-gītā it is stated that those who are too attached to seeking material possessions and material enjoyment cannot reach yoga-samādhi, absorption in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Propaganda that one can enjoy this life materially and at the same time spiritually advance is simply bogus. The principles of renunciation are four: (1) to avoid illicit sex life, (2) to avoid meat-eating, (3) to avoid intoxication and (4) to avoid gambling. These four principles are called tapasya, or austerity. To absorb the mind in the Supreme in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is the process of spiritual realization.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Third Canto, Twentieth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Conversation Between Maitreya and Vidura.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā gave separate portions of his body endowed with knowledge, yoga, siddhis, austerity, worship and detachment to each of the various sages. This verse describes what portions of his body he gave to the different sages. Those portions of his body which had knowledge (samādhi), yoga, siddhis (ṛddhi), austerity, worship and detachment he gave to the various sages. After this, Śiva appeared, and Marīci and others, according to the description in the Twelfth Chapter. Thus ends the commentary on Twentieth Chapter of the Third Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas Chapter Twenty-one Kardama Meets Svāyambhuva Manu
📝 My note