FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

3.2 · Remembrance of Lord Kṛṣṇa

34 verses
S Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (13132 chars)

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Great devotees only desire to hear, narrate and remember the stories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus, when the two great devotees, Vidura and Uddhava, met, they naturally began discussing stories of Krishna, remembering their beloved Lord and His extraordinary pastimes inside and outside of Vrindavana.

Previous S.A.V.E.S Next Vidura’s Pilgrimage Last updated 1 year ago

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4)

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Great devotees only desire to hear, narrate and remember the stories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus, when the two great devotees, Vidura and Uddhava, met, they naturally began discussing stories of Krishna, remembering their beloved Lord and His extraordinary pastimes inside and outside of Vrindavana.

Previous S.A.V.E.S Next Vidura’s Pilgrimage Last updated 1 year ago

Stories in Vrindavana

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Stories in Vrindavana Chapter 2 Being thus questioned, Uddhava’s feelings of separation were aroused as he remembered his beloved Lord Krishna whom he had served throughout his life. Now Krishna had left the planet, extreme misfortune would overcome the world. Instead of dwelling on His disappearance, however, Uddhava related the sweet story of Krishna’s appearance, His playful antics in the land of Vrindavana and the celebrated lifting of Govardhana hill.

Previous Vidura’s Pilgrimage Next Stories Outside of Vrindavana Last updated 1 year ago

Stories Outside of Vrindavana

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Stories Outside of Vrindavana Chapter 3 Uddhava then relished the stories of Krishna’s years in Mathura: the dramatic killing of Kamsa, gurukula pastimes in Sandipani Muni’s asrama , the kidnapping of Rukmini, stealing the parijata tree and confronting Indra, the killing of Narakasura and subsequent marriage to the princesses, and the violent massacre at Kuruksetra. After establishing Maharaja Yuddhistira as the king of the earth, Krishna resided in Dwaraka with His 16,108 queens.

Previous Stories in Vrindavana Next Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Last updated 1 year ago

Story of Krishna’s Disappearance

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Chapter 3, 4 Once, the children of the Yadu dynasty took their mockery too far, and when they angered the sages they were cursed to face destruction. A few months later, at Prabhasa-ksetra, the family members accepted the remnants of a sacrifice, which included liquor. Consequently, they all became intoxicated, lost their clarity of consciousness and spoke harshly to each other. Their arguments escalated and the Yadus eventually destroyed each other. Having removed His dynasty, Krishna now prepared His own departure. He instructed Uddhava to go to Badarikasrama and avoid the mayhem that would take place once He left the planet. Uddhava, however, remained with Krishna due to his attachment. At that time, Maitreya arrived, and the Lord spoke to them both. Having requested instructions from the Lord, Uddhava was enlightened with transcendental, timeless wisdom. When Vidura enquired about the details of that discourse, Uddhava directed him to approach Maitreya Muni, who had heard that same wisdom, was older in age and was also residing nearby. Sukadeva Goswami philosophically clarified how it was the supreme desire of Krishna to leave the planet. The Lord had completed His mission and was confident that Uddhava could disseminate knowledge of Him to the world, especially the sages at Badarikasrama who Krishna could not meet personally. Thus, His earthly pastimes came to their natural conclusion. After some days, Vidura reached the Ganges, where he met Maitreya Muni.

Previous Stories Outside of Vrindavana Next Story Time Last updated 1 year ago

Story Time

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time “As one cultivates a seed by pouring water to fructify it, the seed of devotional service sown in the heart of the devotee may be cultured by pouring water in the form of hearing and chanting of the holy name and pastimes of the Lord. The creeper of devotional service, so nourished, gradually grows, and the devotee, acting as a gardener, goes on pouring the water of constant hearing and chanting. The creeper of devotional service gradually grows so high that it passes through the entire material universe and enters into the spiritual sky, growing still higher and higher until it reaches the planet Goloka Vrindavana. The devotee-gardener is in touch with the abode of the Lord even from the material plane by dint of performing devotional service to the Lord simply by hearing and chanting.” ( SB 3.2.6 ) In early years, we excitedly hear fairytales and fables. Later in life, we peruse biographies and blogs. In mature years, we share wisdom with the world by recounting events and experiences. It’s clear that storytelling is a universal feature of every country, culture and community in the world. The sages of bygone ages, fully in tune with human psychology, communicated the most profound truths of life through the medium of stories. Vyasadeva, the compiler of Vedic literature, specifically wrote the Puranas in the format of historical stories. Srila Prabhupada, an expert storyteller himself, once wrote to a disciple – “The Vedic literatures are full of instructive stories for the spiritual advancement of the human society. If I get good assistance, I can overflood your country with stories so nice and instructive.” ( Letter, 22nd July 1967 )

Previous Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Next Why are stories so powerful? Last updated 1 year ago

The Good Listener

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time The Good Listener Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura trained his followers in the art of good listening. He insisted that devotees regularly hear topics of the Lord ( hari-katha ), and once remarked: “I have had the opportunity to hear and discuss these topics since the beginning of my life. I have been discussing these points for fifty years now, in great detail and at every moment throughout the twenty-four hours, when awake and even when slumbering. While continuously discussing these topics, eventually my body will wear out and fall down. I will glorify until the last moment of my life all that I have learned from my gurus. Why only one mouth? Let me have unlimited mouths and an unlimited lifespan to unlimitedly glorify the unlimited qualities of Krishna’s devotees.” Srila Bhaktisiddhanta often quoted: “I do not consider bad a day covered with clouds, but one devoid of discussing the nectar of krishna-katha.” The Srimad-Bhagavatam affirms that the Supreme Lord “cleanses desire for material enjoyment from the heart of the devotee who has developed the urge to hear His messages, which are in themselves virtuous when properly heard and chanted.” When a speaker carries great potency and realisation, and the listener is serious and receptive, an incredible transmission of transcendental knowledge can transpire. Uddhava was indeed a potent speaker. Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura explains that when Uddhava began speaking, his face was washed by tears due to the stimulation of love (prema) that was awakened at the very thought of Krishna’s pastimes. His heartfelt feelings for the subject matter caused him to faint and lose external consciousness. As a great and pure devotee of the Lord, Vidura was also a first-class hearer. He eagerly enquired about Krishna and His devotees, feeling a deep connection with every one of them. Through four powerful examples, the Srimad-Bhagavatam Mahatmyam describes four qualities of a superior listener: Chataka Bird – this bird is famous for taking water directly from the raincloud, avoiding any secondary source. Similarly, the superior listener hears pure subject matters from authentic sources, carefully avoiding unnecessary talks or distractions. There is a perennial risk of additions to, subtractions from and distortions of transcendental subject matter, and the superior listener is wary of this. Hearing intently from a defective source invites confusion and deviation. Swan – the swan can ingeniously extract milk from a mixture of milk and water. Similarly, the superior listener can draw out the essence of spiritual topics, remaining undiverted by peripheral details, distracting side points or personal preferences. Often, we don’t see things as they are, rather we see things as we are. Under the guidance of saintly teachers, one can draw out the essential principles of scriptures and learn the ways and means to apply them in daily life. Parrot – the parrot is famed for its ability to repeat whatever it learns from its master. In the same way, superior listeners have grasped the subject matter so well that they can communicate it to others in a clear, relevant and inspiring way. Furthermore, the beak of the parrot makes whatever it touches sweeter, and the superior listener also enlivens the transmission of knowledge by asking thoughtful questions which allow everyone to dive deeper into the subject matter. Fish – a fish has the unique ability to sit in an ocean of condensed milk and quietly drink, without any blinking whatsoever. The superior listener similarly gives his undivided attention to the speaker, quietly, attentively and enthusiastically absorbing the transcendental knowledge without distraction. Much of this is credited to the humility and desire that the listener possesses. When one feels desperate and helpless, their heart is eager for transcendental instruction. Some people learn through hearing, others by seeing, and those who don’t, have to learn through experiencing. If we’re unable to hear Krishna’s sweet voice of guidance, He may have to shout a little louder for the message to get through. By hearing transcendental topics ( sravanam ), contemplating them deeply ( mananam ) and finding ways to apply them in our life ( nidhidhyasanam ), we embrace a path of transformation which is quicker, easier and safer. Vaisnavas often add the fourth element of prayer ( vandanam ) to invoke the divine blessings in this noble endeavour.

Previous Why are stories so powerful? Next A - Assembly and Activation (5-12) Last updated 1 year ago

Why are stories so powerful?

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time Why are stories so powerful? Applicable – stories offer greater context and understanding because they personalise a message and make us feel a part of the situation. They offer opportunities to extract life lessons and demonstrate how wisdom plays out in a practical way. Personal – stories are relatable to our own experiences, and thus they become more meaningful. We identify with the heroes and the villains because we all have those tendencies inside of us. Stories allow us to understand ourselves better because the actions of the characters stir something inside each one of us. Emotional – stories have the unique ability of arousing our emotions. They can cause us to laugh, cry, cringe or reflect and thus engage with the message on a level deeper than just the intellect. Stories communicate passions, sadness, hardships and joys. They engrave meaning and purpose into our consciousness, as well as offering inspiration and hope. Digestible – stories make complex topics easy, inconspicuously entering a deeper place within our consciousness. Not only that, but they implant a message even within an unwilling person, since they circumvent one’s ego and pride. Stories don’t tell us something – they show us something. Memorable –research shows that stories are remembered twenty times more than facts alone. We live in times of mass distraction and people’s attention spans have been obliterated. Thus, stories help to communicate things in an effective and efficient way.

Previous Story Time Next The Good Listener Last updated 1 year ago

Vidura’s Pilgrimage

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Vidura’s Pilgrimage Chapter 1 The questions of Saunaka mirrored the questions of Maharaja Pariksit. Thus, Suta Goswami narrated the answers of Sukadeva Goswami. Before he narrated the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya, Sukadeva Goswami explained how Vidura left the palace in Hastinapura and first met Uddhava. When the Pandavas were repeatedly cheated and harassed by the Kauravas, Vidura advised Dhritarastra to return their legitimate share of the kingdom. The blind King and his defiant son, however, categorically refused to entertain that idea. After being sharply insulted by Duryodhana, Vidura concluded it was the apt time to leave Hastinapura and embark on pilgrimage. While visiting numerous holy sites, Vidura heard the happy news that the Pandavas had emerged victorious in the fratricidal war and had now rightfully regained the kingdom. When Vidura reached the Yamuna, he met the great devotee Uddhava, who was Krishna’s cousin and constant companion. Vidura eagerly enquired about Krishna, His various family members, and His dear devotees like the Pandavas.

Previous S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Next Stories in Vrindavana Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.1

↗
శ్రీ శుక ఉవాచ ఇతి భాగవత: పృష్ట: క్షత్‍త్రా వార్తాం ప్రియాశ్రయామ్ । ప్రతివక్తుం న చోత్సేహ ఔత్కణ్ఠ్యాత్స్మారితేశ్వర: ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
iti bhāgavataḥ pṛṣṭaḥ
[iti bhaagavatah prishtah]
kṣattrā vārtāṁ priyāśrayām
[kshattraa vaartaam priyaashrayaam]
prativaktuṁ na cotseha
[prativaktum na chotseha]
autkaṇṭhyāt smāriteśvaraḥ
[autkanthyaat smaariteshvarah]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva said iti — thus bhāgavataḥ — the great devotee pṛṣṭaḥ — being asked kṣattrā — by Vidura vārtām — message priya-āśrayām — regarding the dearest prativaktum — to reply na — not ca — also utsehe — became eager autkaṇṭhyāt — by excessive anxiety smārita — remembrance īśvaraḥ — the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva said
iti bhāgavataḥ pṛṣṭaḥ
iti
thus
bhāgavataḥ
the great devotee
pṛṣṭaḥ
being asked
kṣattrā vārtāṁ priyāśrayām
kṣattrā
by Vidura
vārtām
message
priya-āśrayām
regarding the dearest
prativaktuṁ na cotseha
prativaktum
to reply
na
not
ca
also
autkaṇṭhyāt smāriteśvaraḥ
utsehe
became eager
autkaṇṭhyāt
by excessive anxiety
smārita
remembrance
īśvaraḥ
the Lord.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: When the great devotee Uddhava was asked by Vidura to speak on the messages of the dearest [Lord Kṛṣṇa], Uddhava was unable to answer immediately due to excessive anxiety at the remembrance of the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: When Vidura asked Uddhava for news concerning Kṛṣṇa, Uddhava could not reply out of pain due to separation from Kṛṣṇa, but he began to remember the Lord. In the Second Chapter Uddhava, his face washed in tears because of disturbance due to prema, describes the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa in Vraja until the rāsa dance. Uddhava, fainting because of increased prema in separation from Kṛṣṇa, spoke without being able to reply to the questions of Vidura. By this he shows his condition. He began to remember the Lord when his fainting was broken by the loud questions of Vidura.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.2

↗
య: పఞ్చహాయనో మాత్రా ప్రాతరాశాయ యాచిత: । తన్నైచ్ఛద్రచయన్ యస్య సపర్యాం బాలలీలయా ॥ ౨ ॥
yaḥ paṣca-hāyano mātrā
[yah pashcha-haayano maatraa]
prātar-āśāya yācitaḥ
[praatar-aashaaya yaachitah]
tan naicchad racayan yasya
[tan naichchad rachayan yasya]
saparyāṁ bāla-līlayā
[saparyaam baala-leelayaa]
yaḥ — one who paṣca — five hāyanaḥ — years old mātrā — by his mother prātaḥ-āśāya — for breakfast yācitaḥ — called for tat — that na — not aicchat — liked racayan — playing yasya — whose saparyām — service bāla-līlayā — childhood.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ paṣca-hāyano mātrā
yaḥ
one who
paṣca
five
hāyanaḥ
years old
mātrā
by his mother
prātar-āśāya yācitaḥ
prātaḥ-āśāya
for breakfast
yācitaḥ
called for
tat
that
tan naicchad racayan yasya
na
not
aicchat
liked
racayan
playing
yasya
whose
saparyāṁ bāla-līlayā
saparyām
service
bāla-līlayā
childhood.
He was one who even in his childhood, at the age of five years, was so absorbed in the service of Lord Kṛṣṇa that when he was called by his mother for morning breakfast, he did not wish to have it.

From his very birth, Uddhava was a natural devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, or a nitya-siddha, a liberated soul. From natural instinct he used to serve Lord Kṛṣṇa, even in his childhood. He used to play with dolls in the form of Kṛṣṇa. He would serve the dolls by dressing, feeding and worshiping them, and thus he was constantly absorbed in the play of transcendental realization. These are the signs of an eternally liberated soul. An eternally liberated soul is a devotee of the Lord who never forgets Him. Human life is meant for reviving one’s eternal relation with the Lord, and all religious injunctions are meant for awakening this dormant instinct of the living entity. The sooner this awakening is brought about, the quicker the mission of human life is fulfilled. In a good family of devotees, the child gets the opportunity to serve the Lord in many ways. A soul who is already advanced in devotional service has the opportunity to take birth in such an enlightened family. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (6.41) . Śucīnāṁ śrīmatāṁ gehe yoga-bhraṣṭo ’bhijāyate: even the fallen devotee gets the opportunity to take his birth in the family of a well-situated brāhmaṇa or in a rich, well-to-do mercantile family. In both these families there is a good opportunity to revive one’s sense of God consciousness automatically because particularly in these families the worship of Lord Kṛṣṇa is regularly performed and the child gets the opportunity to imitate the process of worship called arcanā.

The pāṣcarātrikī formula for training persons in devotional service is temple worship, whereby the neophytes get the opportunity to learn devotional service to the Lord. Mahārāja Parīkṣit also used to play with Kṛṣṇa dolls in his childhood. In India the children in good families are still given dolls of the Lord like Rāma and Kṛṣṇa, or sometimes the demigods, so that they may develop the aptitude of service to the Lord. By the grace of the Lord we were given the same opportunity by our parents, and the beginning of our life was based on this principle.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Making an image of Kṛṣṇa, Uddhava used to offer items of worship to it, and when his mother called him for breakfast, he did not want to eat while his worship was incomplete. Playing as a boy of five years, he worshipped a five year old form of Kṛṣṇa using articles of worship he had made. Though his mother called him for breakfast, he did not want to eat since he had not completed his worship.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.3

↗
స కథం సేవయా తస్య కాలేన జరసం గత: । పృష్టో వార్తాం ప్రతిబ్రూయాద్భర్తు: పాదావనుస్మరన్ ॥ ౩ ॥
sa kathaṁ sevayā tasya
[sa katham sevayaa tasya]
kālena jarasaṁ gataḥ
[kaalena jarasam gatah]
pṛṣṭo vārtāṁ pratibrūyād
[prishto vaartaam pratibrooyaad]
bhartuḥ pādāv anusmaran
[bhartuh paadaav anusmaran]
saḥ — Uddhava katham — how sevayā — by such service tasya — his kālena — in course of time jarasam — invalidity gataḥ — undergone pṛṣṭaḥ — asked for vārtām — message pratibrūyāt — just to reply bhartuḥ — of the Lord pādau — His lotus feet anusmaran — remembering.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa kathaṁ sevayā tasya
saḥ
Uddhava
katham
how
sevayā
by such service
tasya
his
kālena jarasaṁ gataḥ
kālena
in course of time
jarasam
invalidity
gataḥ
undergone
pṛṣṭo vārtāṁ pratibrūyād
pṛṣṭaḥ
asked for
vārtām
message
pratibrūyāt
just to reply
bhartuḥ pādāv anusmaran
bhartuḥ
of the Lord
pādau
His lotus feet
anusmaran
remembering.
Uddhava thus served the Lord continually from childhood, and in his old age that attitude of service never slackened. As soon as he was asked about the message of the Lord, he at once remembered all about Him.

Transcendental service to the Lord is not mundane. The service attitude of the devotee gradually increases and never becomes slackened. Generally, in old age a person is allowed retirement from mundane service. But in the transcendental service of the Lord there is no retirement at all; on the contrary, the service attitude increases more and more with the progress of age. In the transcendental service there is no satiation, and therefore there is no retirement. Materially, when a man becomes tired by rendering service in his physical body, he is allowed retirement, but in the transcendental service there is no feeling of fatigue because it is spiritual service and is not on the bodily plane. Service on the bodily plane dwindles as the body grows older, but the spirit is never old, and therefore on the spiritual plane the service is never tiresome.

Uddhava undoubtedly became old, but that does not mean that his spirit became old. His service attitude matured on the transcendental plane, and therefore as soon as he was questioned by Vidura about Lord Kṛṣṇa, he at once remembered his Lord by reference to the context and forgot himself on the physical plane. That is the sign of pure devotional service to the Lord, as will be explained later on ( lakṣaṇaṁ bhakti-yogasya, etc.) in Lord Kapila’s instructions to His mother, Devahūti.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How could Uddhava, who did not age because of his service to the Lord, when asked by Vidura for news about Kṛṣṇa, reply, since he began immediately thinking of the Lord’s lotus feet? Even though years passed (kale) he did not age, being under the influence of service to Kṛṣṇa. Another meaning is “Under the influence of service performed at the proper time, he did not age.” The word kāle should not be taken to mean “with time,” since that would mean that Uddhava was influenced by time. It would contradict the statement tatra pravayaso ’py āsan yuvāno ’ti-balaujasaḥ: even the most elderly inhabitants of the city appeared youthful, full of strength and vitality. (SB 10.45.19)
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.4

↗
స ముహూర్తమభూత్తూష్ణీం కృష్ణాఙ్‌ఘ్రి సుధయా భృశమ్ । తీవ్రేణ భక్తియోగేన నిమగ్న: సాధు నిర్వృత: ॥ ౪ ॥
sa muhūrtam abhūt tūṣṇīṁ
[sa muhoortam abhoot tooshneem]
kṛṣṇāṅghri-sudhayā bhṛśam
[krishnaanghri-sudhayaa bhrisham]
tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena
[teevrena bhakti-yogena]
nimagnaḥ sādhu nirvṛtaḥ
[nimagnah saadhu nirvritah]
saḥ — Uddhava muhūrtam — for a moment abhūt — became tūṣṇīm — dead silent kṛṣṇa-aṅghri — the lotus feet of the Lord sudhayā — by the nectar bhṛśam — well matured tīvreṇa — by very strong bhakti-yogena — devotional service nimagnaḥ — absorbed in sādhu — good nirvṛtaḥ — fully in love.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa muhūrtam abhūt tūṣṇīṁ
saḥ
Uddhava
muhūrtam
for a moment
abhūt
became
tūṣṇīm
dead silent
kṛṣṇāṅghri-sudhayā bhṛśam
kṛṣṇa-aṅghri
the lotus feet of the Lord
sudhayā
by the nectar
bhṛśam
well matured
tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena
tīvreṇa
by very strong
bhakti-yogena
devotional service
nimagnaḥ sādhu nirvṛtaḥ
nimagnaḥ
absorbed in
sādhu
good
nirvṛtaḥ
fully in love.
For a moment he remained dead silent, and his body did not move. He became absorbed in the nectar of remembering the Lord’s lotus feet in devotional ecstasy, and he appeared to be going increasingly deeper into that ecstasy.

On the inquiry by Vidura about Kṛṣṇa, Uddhava appeared to be awakened from slumber. He appeared to regret that he had forgotten the lotus feet of the Lord. Thus he again remembered the lotus feet of the Lord and remembered all his transcendental loving service unto Him, and by so doing he felt the same ecstasy that he used to feel in the presence of the Lord. Because the Lord is absolute, there is no difference between His remembrance and His personal presence. Thus Uddhava remained completely silent for a moment, but then he appeared to be going deeper and deeper into ecstasy. Feelings of ecstasy are displayed by highly advanced devotees of the Lord. There are eight kinds of transcendental changes in the body — tears, shivering of the body, perspiration, restlessness, throbbing, choking of the throat, etc. — and all were manifested by Uddhava in the presence of Vidura.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
For forty-eight minutes he remained silent, since he had become peaceful and blissful, being submerged in the sweetness of Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet which arose from prema caused by intense separation. This verse describes his remembrance of Kṛṣṇa. When he recovered from fainting by the questions of Vidura, Uddhava, exclaimed, “Oh! I have been separated from by master!” He remained silent for forty-eight minutes (muhūrtam) because of relishing the nectar of Kṛṣṇa’s beauty attained by meeting the Lord directly through remembrance of his lotus feet. He became submerged in the sweetness of prema (bhakti-yogena) which appeared when the pain of separation from Kṛṣṇa increased (tivreṇa). This made him forget his previous pain (sādhu—peaceful). He remained in this blissful state (nirvṛtaḥ).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.5

↗
పులకోద్‍‌భిన్నసర్వాఙ్గో ముఞ్చన్మీలద్‍దృశా శుచ: । పూర్ణార్థో లక్షితస్తేన స్‍నేహప్రసరసంప్లుత: ॥ ౫ ॥
pulakodbhinna-sarvāṅgo
[pulakodbhinna-sarvaango]
muṣcan mīlad-dṛśā śucaḥ
[mushchan meelad-drishaa shuchah]
pūrṇārtho lakṣitas tena
[poornaartho lakshitas tena]
sneha-prasara-samplutaḥ
[sneha-prasara-samplutah]
pulaka-udbhinna — bodily changes of transcendental ecstasy sarva-aṅgaḥ — every part of the body muṣcan — smearing mīlat — opening dṛśā — by the eyes śucaḥ — tears of grief pūrṇa-arthaḥ — complete achievement lakṣitaḥ — thus observed tena — by Vidura sneha-prasara — extensive love samplutaḥ — thoroughly assimilated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pulakodbhinna-sarvāṅgo
pulaka-udbhinna
bodily changes of transcendental ecstasy
sarva-aṅgaḥ
every part of the body
muṣcan mīlad-dṛśā śucaḥ
muṣcan
smearing
mīlat
opening
dṛśā
by the eyes
śucaḥ
tears of grief
pūrṇārtho lakṣitas tena
pūrṇa-arthaḥ
complete achievement
lakṣitaḥ
thus observed
tena
by Vidura
sneha-prasara-samplutaḥ
sneha-prasara
extensive love
samplutaḥ
thoroughly assimilated.
It was so observed by Vidura that Uddhava had all the transcendental bodily changes due to total ecstasy, and he was trying to wipe away tears of separation from his eyes. Thus Vidura could understand that Uddhava had completely assimilated extensive love for the Lord.

The symptoms of the highest order of devotional life were observed by Vidura, an experienced devotee of the Lord, and he confirmed Uddhava’s perfectional stage of love of Godhead. Ecstatic bodily changes are manifested from the spiritual plane and are not artificial expressions developed by practice. There are three different stages of development in devotional service. The first stage is that of following the regulative principles prescribed in the codes of devotional service, the second stage is that of assimilation and realization of the steady condition of devotional service, and the last stage is that of ecstasy symptomized by transcendental bodily expression. The nine different modes of devotional service, such as hearing, chanting and remembering, are the beginning of the process. By regular hearing of the glories and pastimes of the Lord, the impurities in the student’s heart begin to be washed off. The more one is cleansed of impurities, the more one becomes fixed in devotional service. Gradually the activities take the forms of steadiness, firm faith, taste, realization and assimilation, one after another. These different stages of gradual development increase love of God to the highest stage, and in the highest stage there are still more symptoms, such as affection, anger and attachment, gradually rising in exceptional cases to the mahā-bhāva stage, which is generally not possible for the living entities. All these were manifested by Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, the personification of love of God.

In the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, the chief disciple of Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, these transcendental symptoms displayed by pure devotees like Uddhava are systematically described. We have written a summary study of Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu entitled The Nectar of Devotion, and one may consult this book for more detailed information on the science of devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His whole body erupted in goose bumps, and tears flowed from his closed eyes. Vidura understood that Uddhava had reached the perfection of prema. Uddhava then became inundated in sneha. This verse describes the symptoms of Uddhava’s bliss. Pulakodbhinna-sarvāṅgaḥ means that his whole body was filled with sprouting hairs, like sprouts of trees or shrubs. He also became stunned. Tears flowed from his closed eyes. Vidura (tena) understood that Uddhava had become successful because he had attained prema, as indicated by his symptoms, and because of that prema, he was absorbed (samplutaḥ) completely in melting of his heart (sneha) for the Lord. First he was absorbed in prema, and then he was absorbed in sneha, the next stage of pure love. [Note: Sneha is more intense than prema. ]
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.6

↗
శనకైర్భగవల్లోకాన్నృలోకం పునరాగత: । విమృజ్య నేత్రే విదురం ప్రీత్యాహోద్ధవ ఉత్స్మయన్ ॥ ౬ ॥
śanakair bhagaval-lokān
[shanakair bhagaval-lokaan]
nṛlokaṁ punar āgataḥ
[nrilokam punar aagatah]
vimṛjya netre viduraṁ
[vimrijya netre viduram]
prītyāhoddhava utsmayan
[preetyaahoddhava utsmayan]
śanakaiḥ — gradually bhagavat — the Lord lokāt — from the abode nṛlokam — the planet of the human beings punaḥ āgataḥ — coming again vimṛjya — wiping netre — eyes viduram — unto Vidura prītyā — in affection āha — said uddhavaḥ — Uddhava utsmayan — by all those remembrances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śanakair bhagaval-lokān
śanakaiḥ
gradually
bhagavat
the Lord
lokāt
from the abode
nṛlokaṁ punar āgataḥ
nṛlokam
the planet of the human beings
punaḥ āgataḥ
coming again
vimṛjya netre viduraṁ
vimṛjya
wiping
netre
eyes
viduram
unto Vidura
prītyāhoddhava utsmayan
prītyā
in affection
āha
said
uddhavaḥ
Uddhava
utsmayan
by all those remembrances.
The great devotee Uddhava soon came back from the abode of the Lord to the human plane, and wiping his eyes, he awakened his reminiscence of the past and spoke to Vidura in a pleasing mood.

When Uddhava was fully absorbed in the transcendental ecstasy of love of God, he actually forgot all about the external world. The pure devotee lives constantly in the abode of the Supreme Lord, even in the present body, which apparently belongs to this world. The pure devotee is not exactly on the bodily plane, since he is absorbed in the transcendental thought of the Supreme. When Uddhava wanted to speak to Vidura, he came down from the abode of the Lord, Dvārakā, to the material plane of human beings. Even though a pure devotee is present on this mortal planet, he is here in relation to the Lord for engagement in transcendental loving service, and not for any material cause. A living entity can live either on the material plane or in the transcendental abode of the Lord, in accordance with his existential condition. The conditional changes of the living entity are explained in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta in the instructions given to Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī by Lord Śrī Caitanya: “The living entities all over the universes are enjoying the effects of the respective fruitive results of their own work, life after life. Out of all of them, some may be influenced by the association of pure devotees and thus get the chance to execute devotional service by attainment of taste. This taste is the seed of devotional service, and one who is fortunate enough to have received such a seed is advised to sow it in the core of his heart. As one cultivates a seed by pouring water to fructify it, the seed of devotional service sown in the heart of the devotee may be cultured by pouring water in the form of hearing and chanting of the holy name and pastimes of the Lord. The creeper of devotional service, so nourished, gradually grows, and the devotee, acting as a gardener, goes on pouring the water of constant hearing and chanting. The creeper of devotional service gradually grows so high that it passes through the entire material universe and enters into the spiritual sky, growing still higher and higher until it reaches the planet Goloka Vṛndāvana. The devotee-gardener is in touch with the abode of the Lord even from the material plane by dint of performing devotional service to the Lord simply by hearing and chanting. As a creeper takes shelter of another, stronger tree, similarly the creeper of devotional service, nourished by the devotee, takes shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord and thus becomes fixed. When the creeper is fixed, then the fruit of the creeper comes into existence, and the gardener who nourished it is able to enjoy this fruit of love, and his life becomes successful.” That Uddhava attained this stage is evident from his dealings. He could simultaneously reach the supreme planet and still appear in this world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Gradually returning to this world from the Lord’s abode and rubbing his eyes, Uddhava, amazed at the Lord’s skill in pastimes, spoke to Vidura with affection. From the world of the Lord (bhagaval-lokāt), from Dvārakā filled with eternal pastimes, attained by his intense prema, he returned to external consciousness (nṛlokam) again, attracted by the questions of Vidura. A second time his trance was broken. He became amazed (utsmayan) by remembering the skill with which Kṛṣṇa performed acts such as relieving the world of its burden. Or he burst into a smile by the soothing advice given by the Lord who had said, “O Uddhava! Please return to answer the questions of Vidura.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.7

↗
ఉద్ధవ ఉవాచ కృష్ణద్యుమణినిమ్‍లోచే గీర్ణేష్వజగరేణ హ । కిం ను న: కుశలం బ్రూయాం గతశ్రీషు గృహేష్వహమ్ ॥ ౭ ॥
uddhava uvāca
[uddhava uvaacha]
kṛṣṇa-dyumaṇi nimloce
[krishna-dyumani nimloche]
gīrṇeṣv ajagareṇa ha
[geerneshv ajagarena ha]
kiṁ nu naḥ kuśalaṁ brūyāṁ
[kim nu nah kushalam brooyaam]
gata-śrīṣu gṛheṣv aham
[gata-shreeshu griheshv aham]
uddhavaḥ uvāca — Śrī Uddhava said kṛṣṇa-dyumaṇi — the Kṛṣṇa sun nimloce — having set gīrṇeṣu — being swallowed ajagareṇa — by the great snake ha — in the past kim — what nu — else naḥ — our kuśalam — welfare brūyām — may I say gata-śrīṣu — with good fortune gone away gṛheṣu — in the house aham — I.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uddhava uvāca
uddhavaḥ uvāca
Śrī Uddhava said
kṛṣṇa-dyumaṇi nimloce
kṛṣṇa-dyumaṇi
the Kṛṣṇa sun
nimloce
having set
gīrṇeṣv ajagareṇa ha
gīrṇeṣu
being swallowed
ajagareṇa
by the great snake
ha
in the past
kiṁ nu naḥ kuśalaṁ brūyāṁ
kim
what
nu
else
naḥ
our
kuśalam
welfare
brūyām
may I say
gata-śrīṣu gṛheṣv aham
gata-śrīṣu
with good fortune gone away
gṛheṣu
in the house
aham
I.
Śrī Uddhava said: My dear Vidura, the sun of the world, Lord Kṛṣṇa, has set, and our house has now been swallowed by the great snake of time. What can I say to you about our welfare?

The disappearance of the Kṛṣṇa sun may be explained as follows, according to the commentary of Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura. Vidura was struck with great sorrow when he got the hint of the annihilation of the great Yadu dynasty as well as of his own family, the Kuru dynasty. Uddhava could understand the grief of Vidura, and therefore he first of all wanted to sympathize with him by saying that after the sunset everyone is in darkness. Since the entire world was merged in the darkness of grief, neither Vidura nor Uddhava nor anyone else could be happy. Uddhava was as much aggrieved as Vidura, and there was nothing further to be said about their welfare.

The comparison of Kṛṣṇa to the sun is very appropriate. As soon as the sun sets, darkness automatically appears. But the darkness experienced by the common man does not affect the sun itself either at the time of sunrise or of sunset. Lord Kṛṣṇa’s appearance and disappearance are exactly like that of the sun. He appears and disappears in innumerable universes, and as long as He is present in a particular universe there is all transcendental light in that universe, but the universe from which He passes away is put into darkness. His pastimes, however, are everlasting. The Lord is always present in some universe, just as the sun is present in either the Eastern or the Western Hemisphere. The sun is always present either in India or in America, but when the sun is present in India, the American land is in darkness, and when the sun is present in America, the Indian hemisphere is in darkness.

As the sun appears in the morning and gradually rises to the meridian and then again sets in one hemisphere while simultaneously rising in the other, so Lord Kṛṣṇa’s disappearance in one universe and the beginning of His different pastimes in another take place simultaneously. As soon as one pastime is finished here, it is manifested in another universe. And thus His nitya-līlā, or eternal pastimes, are going on without ending. As the sunrise takes place once in twenty-four hours, similarly the pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa take place in a universe once in a daytime of Brahmā, the account of which is given in the Bhagavad-gītā as 4,300,000,000 solar years. But wherever the Lord is present, all His different pastimes as described in the revealed scriptures take place at regular intervals.

As at sunset the snakes become powerful, thieves are encouraged, ghosts become active, the lotus becomes disfigured and the cakravākī laments, so with the disappearance of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the atheists feel enlivened, and the devotees become sorry.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Uddhava said: Since Kṛṣṇa has disappeared like the sun, how can I describe the condition of us, his friends, devoid of splendor, whose houses have been swallowed by the snake of lamentation? First Uddhava brings out the philosophical conclusion in order to pacify Vidura, who was overcome with grief. By his own external appearance he conveys the unfortunate condition of all those afflicted by the pain of separation from Kṛṣṇa. When Kṛṣṇa, like the sun, has set, how can I speak of the welfare of us, his friends whom you asked about, in houses swallowed by the darkness of lamentation, taking the form of a huge snake? While in a particular place one sees the setting of the sun deity along with his associates and his charier within the zodiac, in other places people see the sun rising, and at positions of forenoon and noon. Similarly when Kṛṣṇa who immerses the universe in his sweet pastimes is seen to disappear from one universe along with his devotees in Gokula, Mathurā and Dvārakā, he is seen to appear in other universes performing pastimes such as birth, rāsa dance, killing Kaṁsa, and marrying Rukmiṇī. The rising, noontime and setting of the sun are not actually different forms of the sun, since they are appearances only. However, Kṛṣṇa’s birth and other actions are not apparent but real since they are all eternal. This is the difference. It has been shown that all of the pastimes of the Lord are eternal in the First Canto, and in the Tenth Canto this is again shown with evidence. Just as in a country affected by the setting sun, dark appears, the lotuses wither, the cakravāka birds lament and thieves, dacoits, Rākṣasas and ghosts become joyful, when Kṛṣṇa disappears from one universe, the world is devoured by the snake of lamentation, the righteous people wither, the devotees lament, the devatās in charge of religion become unsettled and the irreligious people rejoice. This is indicated by Uddhava’s statement about being devoured by the snake.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.8

↗
దుర్భగో బత లోకోఽయం యదవో నితరామపి । యే సంవసన్తో న విదుర్హరిం మీనా ఇవోడుపమ్ ॥ ౮ ॥
durbhago bata loko ’yaṁ
[durbhago bata loko ’yam]
yadavo nitarām api
[yadavo nitaraam api]
ye saṁvasanto na vidur
[ye samvasanto na vidur]
hariṁ mīnā ivoḍupam
[harim meenaa ivodupam]
durbhagaḥ — unfortunate bata — certainly lokaḥ — universe ayam — this yadavaḥ — the Yadu dynasty nitarām — more specifically api — also ye — those saṁvasantaḥ — living together na — did not viduḥ — understand harim — the Personality of Godhead mīnāḥ — the fishes iva uḍupam — like the moon.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
durbhago bata loko ’yaṁ
durbhagaḥ
unfortunate
bata
certainly
lokaḥ
universe
ayam
this
yadavaḥ
the Yadu dynasty
yadavo nitarām api
nitarām
more specifically
api
also
ye saṁvasanto na vidur
ye
those
saṁvasantaḥ
living together
na
did not
viduḥ
understand
hariṁ mīnā ivoḍupam
harim
the Personality of Godhead
mīnāḥ
the fishes
iva uḍupam
like the moon.
This universe with all its planets is most unfortunate. And even more unfortunate are the members of the Yadu dynasty because they could not identify Lord Hari as the Personality of Godhead, any more than the fish could identify the moon.

Uddhava lamented for the unfortunate persons of the world who could not recognize Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa in spite of seeing all His transcendental godly qualities. From the very beginning of His appearance within the prison bars of King Kaṁsa up to His mausala-līlā, although He exhibited His potencies as the Personality of Godhead in the six opulences of wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge and renunciation, the foolish persons of the world could not understand that He was the Supreme Lord, Foolish persons might have thought Him an extraordinary historic figure because they had no intimate touch with the Lord, but more unfortunate were the family members of the Lord, the members of the Yadu dynasty, who were always in company with the Lord but were unable to recognize Him as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Uddhava lamented his own fortune also because although he knew Kṛṣṇa to be the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he could not properly use the opportunity to render devotional service to the Lord. He regretted everyone’s misfortune, including his own. The pure devotee of the Lord thinks himself most unfortunate. That is due to excessive love for the Lord and is one of the transcendental perceptions of viraha, the suffering of separation.

It is learned from the revealed scriptures that the moon was born from the Milk Ocean. There is a Milk Ocean in the upper planets, and there Lord Viṣṇu, who controls the heart of every living being as Paramātmā (the Supersoul), resides as the Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. Those who do not believe in the existence of the Ocean of Milk because they have experience only of the salty water in the ocean should know that the world is also called the go, which means the cow. The urine of a cow is salty, and according to Āyur-vedic medicine the cow’s urine is very effective in treating patients suffering from liver trouble. Such patients may not have any experience of the cow’s milk because milk is never given to liver patients. But the liver patient may know that the cow has milk also, although he has never tasted it. Similarly, men who have experience only of this tiny planet where the saltwater ocean exists may take information from the revealed scriptures that there is also an ocean of milk, although we have never seen it. From this Ocean of Milk the moon was born, but the fish in the Milk Ocean could not recognize that the moon was not another fish and was different from them. The fish took the moon to be one of them or maybe something illuminating, but nothing more. The unfortunate persons who do not recognize Lord Kṛṣṇa are like such fish. They take Him to be one of them, although a little extraordinary in opulence, strength, etc. The Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) confirms such foolish persons to be most unfortunate: avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The inhabitants of Dvārakā and the Yādavas more so, who live together with the Lord, having a close relationship with the Lord since they do not know that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, are most unfortunate, just as fish in the Milk Ocean do not recognize the greatness of the moon situated in the water, and think of it as another fish. Having shown the unfortunate condition of the superior persons of this world without the Lord, out of bewilderment of prema, he criticizes those persons, from seeing his own awareness of the Lords’ great powers which has suddenly arisen from his feeling of great separation, and not seeing that awareness of the Lord’s powers in the Lord’s associates in Dvārakā. These inhabitants of Dvārakā (ayam lokaḥ) who appear in my heart are unfortunate, though they have very close relationship to him by family ties (yadavaḥ nitarām api). Though they live with him, they do not know the Lord, being bewildered by his sweetness. But I am unfortunate because, though I know Kṛṣṇa as the Lord, I did not live together with him at this moment. It is like the fish in the water who on seeing the moon which is situated in the Milk Ocean, think of it as another fish like them, but very attractive. They do not recognize the moon as a devatā, with rays of nectar, who is lord of the night. Similarly the Yādavas recognize Kṛṣṇa’s sweetness, and not his great powers. Saddened by that thought, I call them unfortunate. Actually however, they have great fortune, because it will be explained in the Tenth Canto that those who are aware of Kṛṣṇa’s sweetness are greater than those who are aware of his powers. Na viduḥ is in the present tense to indicate to Vidura that the Yādavas about whom Vidura is inquiring are eternal associates of the Lord and are even now performing pastimes with the Lord. If they were not presently living with the Lord, they would not know him at all. But Uddhava says they do not know him as the Lord while living with him in the present. However, you who ask and I who am asked, being deprived of living with the Lord (since we remain while they have disappeared to join the aprakaṭa pastimes), we alone are unfortunate, and we alone should lament.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.9

↗
ఇఙ్గితజ్ఞా: పురుప్రౌఢా ఏకారామాశ్చ సాత్వతా: । సాత్వతామృషభం సర్వే భూతావాసమమంసత ॥ ౯ ॥
iṅgita-jṣāḥ puru-prauḍhā
[ingita-jshaah puru-praudhaa]
ekārāmāś ca sātvatāḥ
[ekaaraamaash cha saatvataah]
sātvatām ṛṣabhaṁ sarve
[saatvataam rishabham sarve]
bhūtāvāsam amaṁsata
[bhootaavaasam amamsata]
iṅgita-jṣāḥ — expert in psychic study puru-prauḍhāḥ — highly experienced eka — one ārāmāḥ — relaxation ca — also sātvatāḥ — devotees, or own men sātvatām ṛṣabham — head of the family sarve — all bhūta-āvāsam — all-pervading amaṁsata — could think.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iṅgita-jṣāḥ puru-prauḍhā
iṅgita-jṣāḥ
expert in psychic study
puru-prauḍhāḥ
highly experienced
ekārāmāś ca sātvatāḥ
eka
one
ārāmāḥ
relaxation
ca
also
sātvatāḥ
devotees, or own men
sātvatām ṛṣabhaṁ sarve
sātvatām ṛṣabham
head of the family
sarve
all
bhūta-āvāsam
all-pervading
amaṁsata
could think.
bhūtāvāsam amaṁsata
The Yadus were all experienced devotees, learned and expert in psychic study. Over and above this, they were always with the Lord in all kinds of relaxations, and still they were only able to know Him as the one Supreme who dwells everywhere.

In the Vedas it is said that the Supreme Lord or the Paramātmā cannot be understood simply by the strength of one’s erudition or power of mental speculation: nāyam ātmā pravacanena labhyo na medhayā na bahunā śrutena ( Kaṭha Upaniṣad 1.2.23). He can be known only by one who has the mercy of the Lord. The Yādavas were all exceptionally learned and experienced, but in spite of their knowing the Lord as the one who lives in everyone’s heart, they could not understand that He is the original Personality of Godhead. This lack of knowledge was not due to their insufficient erudition; it was due to their misfortune. In Vṛndāvana, however, the Lord was not even known as the Paramātmā because the residents of Vṛndāvana were pure unconventional devotees of the Lord and could think of Him only as their object of love. They did not know that He is the Personality of Godhead. The Yadus, or the residents of Dvārakā, however, could know Lord Kṛṣṇa as Vāsudeva, or the Supersoul living everywhere, but not as the Supreme Lord. As scholars of the Vedas, they verified the Vedic hymns: eko devaḥ . . . sarva-bhūtādhivāsaḥ . . . , antaryāmī . . . and vṛṣṇīnāṁ para-devatā. . . . The Yadus, therefore, accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supersoul incarnated in their family, and not more than that.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Yādavas, knowing the inner heart of the Lord, being very intelligent, enjoying individually with him, knew him as the best of among them and knew him as Paramātmā. “The inhabitants of Dvārakā were not devoid of knowledge of the Lord’s powers as were the inhabitants of Gokula who experienced only sweetness in pure prema. How then can Uddhava say that they did not know the Lord’s powers?” This verse explains. Because they had great intelligence (puru-prauḍhā) they knew what was in Kṛṣṇa’s heart, what to speak of the sweetness of his form. But in spite of that, they did not know his powers. They enjoyed with him individually, in sitting, resting and other activities (ekārāmāḥ). They thought of Kṛṣṇa, who was present as their eternal master and the best person among themselves, as Paramātmā in all beings (bhūtāvāsam). The śruti says eko devaḥ sarva-bhūteṣu gūḍhaḥ: the one lord is residing within all beings. (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad) But they did not know Kṛṣṇa as Svayam Bhagavān, as the source of Nārāyaṇa. That is the meaning when Uddhava said that they did not know the Lord. In this world it is proper that some know Kṛṣṇa as Bhagavān and some do not. That is not criticized. Criticized are those who are intermediate, those who half know Bhagavān.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.10

↗
దేవస్య మాయయా స్పృష్టా యే చాన్యదసదాశ్రితా: । భ్రామ్యతే ధీర్న తద్వాక్యైరాత్మన్యుప్తాత్మనో హరౌ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
devasya māyayā spṛṣṭā
[devasya maayayaa sprishtaa]
ye cānyad asad-āśritāḥ
[ye chaanyad asad-aashritaah]
bhrāmyate dhīr na tad-vākyair
[bhraamyate dheer na tad-vaakyair]
ātmany uptātmano harau
[aatmany uptaatmano harau]
devasya — of the Personality of Godhead māyayā — by the influence of external energy spṛṣṭāḥ — infected ye — all those ca — and anyat — others asat — illusory āśritāḥ — being taken to bhrāmyate — bewilder dhīḥ — intelligence na — not tat — of them vākyaiḥ — by those words ātmani — in the Supreme Self upta-ātmanaḥ — surrendered souls harau — unto the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
devasya māyayā spṛṣṭā
devasya
of the Personality of Godhead
māyayā
by the influence of external energy
spṛṣṭāḥ
infected
ye cānyad asad-āśritāḥ
ye
all those
ca
and
anyat
others
asat
illusory
āśritāḥ
being taken to
bhrāmyate dhīr na tad-vākyair
bhrāmyate
bewilder
dhīḥ
intelligence
na
not
tat
of them
vākyaiḥ
by those words
ātmany uptātmano harau
ātmani
in the Supreme Self
upta-ātmanaḥ
surrendered souls
harau
unto the Lord.
Under no circumstances can the words of persons bewildered by the illusory energy of the Lord deviate the intelligence of those who are completely surrendered souls.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead according to all the evidences of the Vedas. He is accepted by all ācāryas, including Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya. But when He was present in the world, different classes of men accepted Him differently, and therefore their calculations of the Lord were also different. Generally, persons who had faith in the revealed scriptures accepted the Lord as He is, and all of them merged into great bereavement when the Lord disappeared from the world. In the First Canto we have already discussed the lamentation of Arjuna and Yudhiṣṭhira, to whom the disappearance of Lord Kṛṣṇa was almost intolerable up to the end of their lives.

The Yādavas were only partially cognizant of the Lord, but they are also glorious because they had the opportunity to associate with the Lord, who acted as the head of their family, and they also rendered the Lord intimate service. The Yādavas and other devotees of the Lord are different from those who wrongly calculated Him to be an ordinary human personality. Such persons are certainly bewildered by the illusory energy. They are hellish and are envious of the Supreme Lord. The illusory energy acts very powerfully on them because in spite of their elevated mundane education, such persons are faithless and are infected by the mentality of atheism. They are always very eager to establish that Lord Kṛṣṇa was an ordinary man who was killed by a hunter due to His many impious acts in plotting to kill the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Jarāsandha, the demoniac kings of the earth. Such persons have no faith in the statement of the Bhagavad-gītā that the Lord is unaffected by the reactions of work: na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti. According to the atheistic point of view, Lord Kṛṣṇa’s family, the Yadu dynasty, was vanquished due to being cursed by the brāhmaṇas for the sins committed by Kṛṣṇa in killing the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, etc. All these blasphemies do not touch the heart of the devotees of the Lord because they know perfectly well what is what. Their intelligence regarding the Lord is never disturbed. But those who are disturbed by the statements of the asuras are also condemned. That is what Uddhava meant in this verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The intelligence of the devotee who is absorbed in Paramātmā is not bewildered by the words of those touched by the Lord’s māyā or those who take shelter of a demonic mentality. Those devotees living in the material world suffer in separation from the Lord, and the Yādavas, eternally in his association, are happy in his association. These two types of persons are fortunate since they have devotion. Others, not being devotees, have hellish existence. That is explained in this verse. Those touched by the Lord’s māyā, thinking themselves learned, and those who take shelter of evil mentality, completely different from the real conclusions, the demons, say that Kṛṣṇa gave up his body and went to Vaikuṇṭha. They say that Kṛṣṇa along with his dynasty was destroyed by the curse of a brāhmaṇa, since he committed unjustified violence against great kings like Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Jarāsandha. However the intelligence of the devotee who has absorbed his mind (uptātmanaḥ) in Paramātmā is not bewildered by such critical words. Rather, he is absorbed in Kṛṣṇa’s sweetness. Those who are bewildered by such words deserve hell.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.11

↗
ప్రదర్శ్యాతప్తతపసామవితృప్తద‍ృశాం నృణామ్ । ఆదాయాన్తరధాద్యస్తు స్వబిమ్బం లోకలోచనమ్ ॥ ౧౧ ॥
pradarśyātapta-tapasām
[pradarshyaatapta-tapasaam]
avitṛpta-dṛśāṁ nṛṇām
[avitripta-drishaam nrinaam]
ādāyāntar adhād yas tu
[aadaayaantar adhaad yas tu]
sva-bimbaṁ loka-locanam
[sva-bimbam loka-lochanam]
pradarśya — by exhibiting atapta — without undergoing tapasām — penances avitṛpta-dṛśām — without fulfillment of vision nṛṇām — of persons ādāya — taking antaḥ — disappearance adhāt — performed yaḥ — He who tu — but sva-bimbam — His own form loka-locanam — public vision.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pradarśyātapta-tapasām
pradarśya
by exhibiting
atapta
without undergoing
tapasām
penances
avitṛpta-dṛśāṁ nṛṇām
avitṛpta-dṛśām
without fulfillment of vision
nṛṇām
of persons
ādāyāntar adhād yas tu
ādāya
taking
antaḥ
disappearance
adhāt
performed
yaḥ
He who
tu
but
sva-bimbaṁ loka-locanam
sva-bimbam
His own form
loka-locanam
public vision.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who manifested His eternal form before the vision of all on the earth, performed His disappearance by removing His form from the sight of those who were unable to see Him [as He is] due to not executing required penance.

In this verse the word avitṛpta-dṛśām is most significant. The conditioned souls in the material world are all trying to satisfy their senses in various ways, but they have failed to do so because it is impossible to be satisfied by such efforts. The example of the fish on land is very appropriate. If one takes a fish from the water and puts it on the land, it cannot be made happy by any amount of offered pleasure. The spirit soul can be happy only in the association of the supreme living being, the Personality of Godhead, and nowhere else. The Lord, by His unlimited causeless mercy, has innumerable Vaikuṇṭha planets in the brahmajyoti sphere of the spiritual world, and in that transcendental world there is an unlimited arrangement for the unlimited pleasure of the living entities.

The Lord Himself comes to display His transcendental pastimes, typically represented at Vṛndāvana, Mathurā and Dvārakā. He appears just to attract the conditioned souls back to Godhead, back home to the eternal world. But for want of sufficient piety, the onlookers are not attracted by such pastimes of the Lord. In Bhagavad-gītā it is said that only those who have completely surpassed the way of sinful reaction can engage themselves in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. The entire Vedic way of ritualistic performances is to put every conditioned soul on the path of piety. By strict adherence to the prescribed principles for all orders of social life, one can attain the qualities of truthfulness, control of the mind, control of the senses, forbearance, etc., and can be elevated to the plane of rendering pure devotional service to the Lord. Only by such a transcendental vision are one’s material hankerings fully satisfied.

When the Lord was present, persons who were able to satisfy their material hankerings by seeing Him in true perspective were thus able to go back with Him to His kingdom. But those persons who were unable to see the Lord as He is remained attached to material hankerings and were not able to go back home, back to Godhead. When the Lord passed beyond the vision of all, He did so in His original eternal form, as stated in this verse. The Lord left in His own body; He did not leave His body as is generally misunderstood by the conditioned souls. This statement defeats the false propaganda of the faithless nondevotees that the Lord passed away like an ordinary conditioned soul. The Lord appeared in order to release the world from the undue burden of the nonbelieving asuras, and after doing this, He disappeared from the world’s eyes.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, having shown his form, the center of attraction for all eyes, then took that form and disappeared from person who had not performed austerities but had attained the Lord’s mercy, and were continually craving a vision of his form. The view of the devotees is correct. What is that? This verse answers. The Lord, showing his form (sva-bimbam) to men, made them taste his sweetness, and ignoring the fact that their eyes were unsatisfied (avitṛpta-dṛśām), took his form, covered it from their eyes, and suddenly disappeared. (He did not give up a material body). Genitive case (avitṛpta-dṛśāṁ nṛnām) is used to show disregard. The word yaḥ is not related to a correlative saḥ in a following verse. It is like yad in the sentence sādhu candramasi puṣkaraiḥ krṭaṁ mīlitaṁ yad abhirāmatādhikaḥ. It is suggested in this verse that the Lord thought that those who were greedy for him even without his disappearance would taste his sweetness more profoundly by separation. “But this will make the Lord someone who takes back what he has given.” This is answered in the last line. The eyes of all people (loka-locanam) are situated in him. He gave his form to men so that he could attract all their eyes, not to give them a spiritual benediction and then take it away like a thief. This verse also suggests vyāja-stuti, criticism acting as praise for his attractive features. When Kṛṣṇa appeared on earth, he made everyone blind by attracting their eyes, rather than protecting them! “Since the Lord has unlimited sweetness what harm would it do him if he were to let everyone taste it for a long time? What would be the fault, since he is the ocean of mercy? His disappearance creates misfortune for all people.” The answer is given in the words atapta-tapasām. The expression is used to indicate a common man’s view. They had not performed austerity, but they had attained his great mercy. Detachment from matter is not a cause of great attraction for the Lord. Thus the real cause is suggested by the phrase avitṛpta-dṛśām. The phrase avitṛpta-dṛśām, “having unsatisfied eyes” has the following meaning. When one sees the Lord, after attaining great mercy, then one is never satisfied even by seeing him many times: atrodite bhavej jātu na tṛptir darśanādiṣu. (Ujjvala-nīlamaṇi 14.79) This is a symptom of the stage of sneha. Therefore, taking his form, he disappeared. And by this statement, the idea that the Lord gave up his body is also defeated. In the following two verses also, the argument that Kṛṣṇa gave up a material form and assumed a spiritual form is defeated by the words describing his form. The phrases “showing his form” and “disappearing” also merely indicate that people cannot see the form. As well those phrases indicate that the Lord performs these actions by his will. Those that argue that Kṛṣṇa is dependent on karma are defeated. The statements of Uddhava, rather than those of opposed to the Lord, should be taken as authoritative to defeat the ideas of the materialists presented in the previous verse. His statement, like the statement kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam, should be taken as conclusive. Thus Bhāgavatam becomes full of flavor and pleasing for the listener.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.12

↗
యన్మర్త్యలీలౌపయికం స్వయోగ- మాయాబలం దర్శయతా గృహీతమ్ । విస్మాపనం స్వస్య చ సౌభగర్ద్ధే: పరం పదం భూషణభూషణాఙ్గమ్ ॥ ౧౨ ॥
yan martya-līlaupayikaṁ sva-yoga-
[yan martya-leelaupayikam sva-yoga-]
māyā-balaṁ darśayatā gṛhītam
[maayaa-balam darshayataa griheetam]
vismāpanaṁ svasya ca saubhagarddheḥ
[vismaapanam svasya cha saubhagarddheh]
paraṁ padaṁ bhūṣaṇa-bhūṣaṇāṅgam
[param padam bhooshana-bhooshanaangam]
yat — His eternal form which martya — mortal world līlā-upayikam — just suitable for the pastimes sva-yoga-māyā-balam — potency of the internal energy darśayatā — for manifestation gṛhītam — discovered vismāpanam — wonderful svasya — of His own ca — and saubhaga-ṛddheḥ — of the opulent param — supreme padam — ultimate stand bhūṣaṇa — ornament bhūṣaṇa-aṅgam — of the ornaments.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yan martya-līlaupayikaṁ sva-yoga-
yat
His eternal form which
martya
mortal world
līlā-upayikam
just suitable for the pastimes
sva-yoga-māyā-balam
potency of the internal energy
māyā-balaṁ darśayatā gṛhītam
darśayatā
for manifestation
gṛhītam
discovered
vismāpanaṁ svasya ca saubhagarddheḥ
vismāpanam
wonderful
svasya
of His own
ca
and
saubhaga-ṛddheḥ
of the opulent
paraṁ padaṁ bhūṣaṇa-bhūṣaṇāṅgam
param
supreme
padam
ultimate stand
bhūṣaṇa
ornament
bhūṣaṇa-aṅgam
of the ornaments.
The Lord appeared in the mortal world by His internal potency, yoga-māyā. He came in His eternal form, which is just suitable for His pastimes. These pastimes were wonderful for everyone, even for those proud of their own opulence, including the Lord Himself in His form as the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha. Thus His [Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s] transcendental body is the ornament of all ornaments.

In conformity with the Vedic hymns ( nityo nityānāṁ cetanaś cetanānām ), the Personality of Godhead is more excellent than all other living beings within all the universes in the material world. He is the chief of all living entities; no one can surpass Him or be equal to Him in wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge or renunciation. When Lord Kṛṣṇa was within this universe, He seemed to be a human being because He appeared in a manner just suitable for His pastimes in the mortal world. He did not appear in human society in His Vaikuṇṭha feature with four hands because that would not have been suitable for His pastimes. But in spite of His appearing as a human being, no one was or is equal to Him in any respect in any of the six different opulences. Everyone is more or less proud of his opulence in this world, but when Lord Kṛṣṇa was in human society, He excelled all His contemporaries within the universe.

When the Lord’s pastimes are visible to the human eye, they are called prakaṭa, and when they are not visible they are called aprakaṭa. In fact, the Lord’s pastimes never stop, just as the sun never leaves the sky. The sun is always in its right orbit in the sky, but it is sometimes visible and sometimes invisible to our limited vision. Similarly, the pastimes of the Lord are always current in one universe or another, and when Lord Kṛṣṇa disappeared from the transcendental abode of Dvārakā, it was simply a disappearance from the eyes of the people there. It should not be misunderstood that His transcendental body, which is just suitable for the pastimes in the mortal world, is in any way inferior to His different expansions in the Vaikuṇṭhalokas. His body manifested in the material world is transcendental par excellence in the sense that His pastimes in the mortal world excel His mercy displayed in the Vaikuṇṭhalokas. In the Vaikuṇṭhalokas the Lord is merciful toward the liberated or nitya-mukta living entities, but in His pastimes in the mortal world He is merciful even to the fallen souls who are nitya-baddha, or conditioned forever. The six excellent opulences which He displayed in the mortal world by the agency of His internal potency, yoga-māyā, are rare even in the Vaikuṇṭhalokas. All His pastimes were manifested not by the material energy but by His spiritual energy. The excellence of His rāsa-līlā at Vṛndāvana and His householder life with sixteen thousand wives is wonderful even for Nārāyaṇa in Vaikuṇṭha and is certainly so for other living entities within this mortal world. His pastimes are wonderful even for other incarnations of the Lord, such as Śrī Rāma, Nṛsiṁha and Varāha. His opulence was so superexcellent that His pastimes were adored even by the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha, who is not different from Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa possesses that form suitable for human pastimes to show the full capacity of his yoga-māyā. That form astonishes even the lord of Vaikuṇṭha. It is the pinnacle of auspicious qualities and enhances the beauty of his ornaments. “When he made his form disappear, did he go to Vaikuṇṭha?” How could he take that form suitable for human pastimes (martya-līlaupayikam) to Vaikuṇṭha? This means that even now, as previously, he is residing in Dvārakā. But one should not think that the Lord has some fault because he has human pastimes. On the contrary, the human pastimes are superior to the Vaikuṇṭha pastimes. He accepted a form suitable for human pastimes in order to show the full capacity (balam) of his yoga-māyā, his spiritual energy arising from his svarūpa. He does not establish this form by hiding sweetness or power, but by depositing all his powers in this human form. Such capacity is not displayed even in Vaikuṇṭha. Though it is said that the Lord accepted this form, his form is inseparable from himself. No time of accepting that form is indicated. In the following statement gṛhitā is used in a similar way. Actually māyā eternally accepts the guṇas. attvaṁ rajas tama iti nirguṇasya guṇās trayaḥ sthiti-sarga-nirodheṣu gṛhītā māyayā vibhoḥ The three guṇas of sattva, rajas and tamas, belonging to the Lord without guṇas, are accepted by the māyā of the Lord for creation, maintenance and destruction. SB 2.5.18 Intelligence makes distinctions in the Lord even though the Lord cannot be distinguished in parts. Thus gṛhītam simply means “he revealed” according to Bhagavat-sandarbha. Another meaning is as follows. In order to show that human form, the Lord accepted the strength of his yoga-māyā for accomplishing pastimes such as marrying sixteen thousand queens, which would astonish even Kṛṣṇa’s expansion, the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha (svasya). “This human form with such qualities astonishes even me, what to speak of astonishing the associates of the lord in Vaikuṇṭha, who can se all the forms and qualities of all the avatāras!” This form is the supreme position (paraṁ padam) of complete auspiciousness (saubhagardheḥ). Even the lord of Vaikuṇṭha desires to see this form: dvijātmajā me yuvayor didṛkṣuṇā mayopanītā bhuvi dharma-guptaye I have brought the brāhmaṇa’s sons here because I wanted to see the two of you, who have descended to the earth to save the principles of religion. SB 10.89.58 His limbs are ornaments (enhancers) of ornaments. This indicates Kṛṣṇa’s supreme beauty.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.13

↗
యద్ధర్మసూనోర్బత రాజసూయే నిరీక్ష్య ద‍ృక్స్వస్త్యయనం త్రిలోక: । కార్త్స్‍న్యేన చాద్యేహ గతం విధాతు- రర్వాక్సృతౌ కౌశలమిత్యమన్యత ॥ ౧౩ ॥
yad dharma-sūnor bata rājasūye
[yad dharma-soonor bata raajasooye]
nirīkṣya dṛk-svastyayanaṁ tri-lokaḥ
[nireekshya drik-svastyayanam tri-lokah]
kārtsnyena cādyeha gataṁ vidhātur
[kaartsnyena chaadyeha gatam vidhaatur]
arvāk-sṛtau kauśalam ity amanyata
[arvaak-sritau kaushalam ity amanyata]
yat — the form which dharma-sūnoḥ — of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira bata — certainly rājasūye — in the arena of the rājasūya sacrifice nirīkṣya — by observing dṛk — sight svastyayanam — pleasing tri-lokaḥ — the three worlds kārtsnyena — in sum total ca — thus adya — today iha — within the universe gatam — surpassed vidhātuḥ — of the creator (Brahmā) arvāk — recent mankind sṛtau — in the material world kauśalam — dexterity iti — thus amanyata — contemplated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad dharma-sūnor bata rājasūye
yat
the form which
dharma-sūnoḥ
of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
bata
certainly
rājasūye
in the arena of the rājasūya sacrifice
nirīkṣya dṛk-svastyayanaṁ tri-lokaḥ
nirīkṣya
by observing
dṛk
sight
svastyayanam
pleasing
tri-lokaḥ
the three worlds
kārtsnyena
in sum total
kārtsnyena cādyeha gataṁ vidhātur
ca
thus
adya
today
iha
within the universe
gatam
surpassed
vidhātuḥ
of the creator (Brahmā)
arvāk-sṛtau kauśalam ity amanyata
arvāk
recent mankind
sṛtau
in the material world
kauśalam
dexterity
iti
thus
amanyata
contemplated.
All the demigods from the upper, lower and middle universal planetary systems assembled at the altar of the rājasūya sacrifice performed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. After seeing the beautiful bodily features of Lord Kṛṣṇa, they all contemplated that He was the ultimate dexterous creation of Brahmā, the creator of human beings.

There was nothing comparable to the bodily features of Lord Kṛṣṇa when He was present in this world. The most beautiful object in the material world may be compared to the blue lotus flower or the full moon in the sky, but even the lotus flower and the moon were defeated by the beauty of the bodily features of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and this was certified by the demigods, the most beautiful living creatures in the universe. The demigods thought that Lord Kṛṣṇa, like themselves, was also created by Lord Brahmā, but in fact Brahmā was created by Lord Kṛṣṇa. It was not within the power of Brahmā to create the transcendental beauty of the Supreme Lord. No one is the creator of Kṛṣṇa; rather, He is the creator of everyone. As He says in Bhagavad-gītā (10.8) , ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
At the rājasūya sacrifice of Yudhiṣṭhira, all the people of the universe, seeing the form of the Lord which created auspiciousness in all directions, considered that the skill of the creator in making the most beautiful objects in the recent universe was nullified completely at that time. In this verse Uddhava reminds Vidura, “You have directly witnessed the great auspiciousness of Kṛṣṇa.” All people within the three worlds including Brahmā and Indra considered that today in this universe the skill of the creator in constructing the recent, variegated world had all been nullified by seeing the beauty of Kṛṣṇa’s limbs. There is now disgust with the creations of the blossoming blue lotus, lamp black ointment, the blue sapphire and the rain cloud. Seeing the beauty of his face, what is the use of the moon and the lotus?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.14

↗
యస్యానురాగప్లుతహాసరాస- లీలావలోకప్రతిలబ్ధమానా: । వ్రజస్త్రియో ద‍ృగ్భిరనుప్రవృత్త- ధియోఽవతస్థు: కిల కృత్యశేషా: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
yasyānurāga-pluta-hāsa-rāsa-
[yasyaanuraaga-pluta-haasa-raasa-]
līlāvaloka-pratilabdha-mānāḥ
[leelaavaloka-pratilabdha-maanaah]
vraja-striyo dṛgbhir anupravṛtta-
[vraja-striyo drigbhir anupravritta-]
dhiyo ’vatasthuḥ kila kṛtya-śeṣāḥ
[dhiyo ’vatasthuh kila kritya-sheshaah]
yasya — whose anurāga — attachment pluta — enhanced by hāsa — laughter rāsa — humors līlā — pastimes avaloka — glancing pratilabdha — obtained thereof mānāḥ — anguished vraja-striyaḥ — damsels of Vraja dṛgbhiḥ — with the eyes anupravṛtta — following dhiyaḥ — by intelligence avatasthuḥ — sat silently kila — indeed kṛtya-śeṣāḥ — without finishing household duties.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yasyānurāga-pluta-hāsa-rāsa-
yasya
whose
anurāga
attachment
pluta
enhanced by
hāsa
laughter
rāsa
humors
līlāvaloka-pratilabdha-mānāḥ
līlā
pastimes
avaloka
glancing
pratilabdha
obtained thereof
mānāḥ
anguished
vraja-striyo dṛgbhir anupravṛtta-
vraja-striyaḥ
damsels of Vraja
dṛgbhiḥ
with the eyes
anupravṛtta
following
dhiyo ’vatasthuḥ kila kṛtya-śeṣāḥ
dhiyaḥ
by intelligence
avatasthuḥ
sat silently
kila
indeed
kṛtya-śeṣāḥ
without finishing household duties.
The damsels of Vraja, after pastimes of laughter, humor and exchanges of glances, were anguished when Kṛṣṇa left them. They used to follow Him with their eyes, and thus they sat down with stunned intelligence and could not finish their household duties.

In His boyhood at Vṛndāvana, Lord Kṛṣṇa was notorious as a teasing friend in transcendental love to all the girls His age. His love for them was so intense that there is no comparison to that ecstasy, and the damsels of Vraja were so much attached to Him that their affection excelled that of the great demigods like Brahmā and Śiva. Lord Kṛṣṇa finally admitted His defeat before the transcendental affection of the gopīs and declared that He was unable to repay them for their unalloyed affection. Although the gopīs were seemingly anguished by the Lord’s teasing behavior, when Kṛṣṇa would leave them they could not tolerate the separation and used to follow Him with their eyes and minds. They were so stunned by the situation that they could not finish their household duties. No one could excel Him even in the dealing of love exchanged between boys and girls. It is said in the revealed scriptures that Lord Kṛṣṇa personally never goes beyond the boundary of Vṛndāvana. He remains there eternally because of the transcendental love of the inhabitants. Thus even though He is not visible at present, He is not away from Vṛndāvana for a moment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The women of Vraja, after pastimes of laughter, rasas and exchanges of glances, followed him with their eyes when he left, and thus they sat down with stunned intelligence and could not finish their household duties. But the attraction of the gopīs for Kṛṣṇa was much greater than all others in the universe including Brahmā and Indra, because Kṛṣṇa did not respect these devatās as much as he respected the gopīs. Having great respect for Kṛṣṇa after he had respected them by his playful glances and by all rasas accompanied by smiles permeated with love (anurāga-pluta), the women of Vraja, whose minds followed him with their eyes, at that moment remained standing, unable to move at all because of paralysis due to ecstasy. They stopped all activities such as cleaning, smearing cow dung, churning yogurt, and serving food. Even in the midst of doing activities, if they happened to see him suddenly, they remained motionless, not completing their chores. This love which astonished the whole universe including Kṛṣṇa himself, and the bewilderment it created in the women of Vraja, arose from the profusion of their prema. By repeated descriptions of Kṛṣṇa’s human pastimes, the eternal position of his abodes of Gokula, Mathurā and Dvārakā, compared to the rising and setting of the sun, is suggested.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.15

↗
స్వశాన్తరూపేష్వితరై: స్వరూపై- రభ్యర్ద్యమానేష్వనుకమ్పితాత్మా । పరావరేశో మహదంశయుక్తో హ్యజోఽపి జాతో భగవాన్ యథాగ్ని: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
sva-śānta-rūpeṣv itaraiḥ sva-rūpair
[sva-shaanta-roopeshv itaraih sva-roopair]
abhyardyamāneṣv anukampitātmā
[abhyardyamaaneshv anukampitaatmaa]
parāvareśo mahad-aṁśa-yukto
[paraavaresho mahad-amsha-yukto]
hy ajo ’pi jāto bhagavān yathāgniḥ
[hy ajo ’pi jaato bhagavaan yathaagnih]
sva-śānta-rūpeṣu — unto the peaceful devotees of the Lord itaraiḥ — others, nondevotees sva-rūpaiḥ — according to their own modes of nature abhyardyamāneṣu — being harassed by anukampita-ātmā — the all-compassionate Lord para-avara — spiritual and material īśaḥ — controller mahat-aṁśa-yuktaḥ — accompanied by the plenary portion of mahat-tattva hi — certainly ajaḥ — the unborn api — although jātaḥ — is born bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead yathā — as if agniḥ — the fire.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sva-śānta-rūpeṣv itaraiḥ sva-rūpair
sva-śānta-rūpeṣu
unto the peaceful devotees of the Lord
itaraiḥ
others, nondevotees
sva-rūpaiḥ
according to their own modes of nature
abhyardyamāneṣv anukampitātmā
abhyardyamāneṣu
being harassed by
anukampita-ātmā
the all-compassionate Lord
parāvareśo mahad-aṁśa-yukto
para-avara
spiritual and material
īśaḥ
controller
mahat-aṁśa-yuktaḥ
accompanied by the plenary portion of mahat-tattva
hi
certainly
hy ajo ’pi jāto bhagavān yathāgniḥ
ajaḥ
the unborn
api
although
jātaḥ
is born
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
yathā
as if
agniḥ
the fire.
The Personality of Godhead, the all-compassionate controller of both the spiritual and material creations, is unborn, but when there is friction between His peaceful devotees and persons who are in the material modes of nature, He takes birth just like fire, accompanied by the mahat-tattva.

The devotees of the Lord are by nature peaceful because they have no material hankering. A liberated soul has no hankering, and therefore he has no lamentation. One who wants to possess also laments when he loses his possession. Devotees have no hankerings for material possessions and no hankerings for spiritual salvation. They are situated in the transcendental loving service of the Lord as a matter of duty, and they do not mind where they are or how they have to act. Karmīs, jṣānīs and yogīs all hanker to possess some material or spiritual assets. Karmīs want material possessions, jṣānīs and yogīs want spiritual possessions, but devotees do not want any material or spiritual assets. They want only to serve the Lord anywhere in the material or spiritual worlds that the Lord desires, and the Lord is always specifically compassionate towards such devotees.

The karmīs, jṣānīs and yogīs have their particular mentalities in the modes of nature, and therefore they are called itara or nondevotees. These itaras, including even the yogīs, sometimes harass the devotees of the Lord. Durvāsā Muni, a great yogī, harassed Mahārāja Ambarīṣa because the latter was a great devotee of the Lord. And the great karmī and jṣānī Hiraṇyakaśipu even harassed his own Vaiṣṇava son, Prahlāda Mahārāja. There are many instances of such harassment of the peaceful devotees of the Lord by the itaras. When such friction takes place, the Lord, out of His great compassion towards His pure devotees, appears in person, accompanied by His plenary portions controlling the mahat-tattva.

The Lord is everywhere, in both the material and spiritual domains, and He appears for the sake of His devotees when there is friction between His devotee and the nondevotee. As electricity is generated by friction of matter anywhere and everywhere, the Lord, being all-pervading, appears because of the friction of devotees and nondevotees. When Lord Kṛṣṇa appears on a mission, all His plenary portions accompany Him. When He appeared as the son of Vasudeva, there were differences of opinion about His incarnation. Some said, “He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” Some said, “He is an incarnation of Nārāyaṇa,” and others said, “He is the incarnation of Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu.” But actually He is the original Supreme Personality of Godhead — kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam — and Nārāyaṇa, the puruṣas and all other incarnations accompany Him to function as different parts of His pastimes. Mahad-aṁśa-yuktaḥ indicates that He is accompanied by the puruṣas, who create the mahat-tanva. It is confirmed in the Vedic hymns, mahāntaṁ vibhum ātmānam.

Lord Kṛṣṇa appeared, just like electricity, when there was friction between Kaṁsa and Vasudeva and Ugrasena. Vasudeva and Ugrasena were the Lord’s devotees, and Kaṁsa, a representative of the karmīs and jṣānīs, was a nondevotee. Kṛṣṇa, as He is, is compared to the sun. He first appeared from the ocean of the womb of Devakī, and gradually He satisfied the inhabitants of the places surrounding Mathurā, just as the sun enlivens the lotus flower in the morning. After gradually rising to the meridian of Dvārakā, the Lord set like the sun, placing everything in darkness, as described by Uddhava.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being compassionate in mind, when his devotees are afflicted by the demons, Svayam Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, though not having material birth, appears within this world along with all his Viṣṇu expansions, since he is the lord of all forms of God and devatās. “But from your mouth we hear that Vaikuṇṭha Nārāyaṇa came and appeared in Vasudeva’s house, that the ancient Lord took a black and white hair, that Kṛṣṇa expands from Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, that he expands from Nara-nārāyaṇa or Vāmana, and we also hear that Kṛṣṇa, with human pastimes, is situated in Dvārakā and other places as the highest form. What is the real truth?” Kṛṣṇa is the lord of the Nārāyaṇa forms (para) beyond prakṛti, is the lord of Brahmā and others (avara), who is Svayam Bhagavān, and is endowed with forms such as Mahā-viṣṇu creator of mahat-tattva (mahad) and aṁśas like Matsya, Kūrma, Nṛhari, Nara-nārāyaṇa, and Vāmana. When the devotees are afflicted by the demons, Kṛṣṇa, whose mind is full of compassion (anukampitātmā, appears in this world, though he is unborn, without material birth. According to the śruti the Lord is called mahat. Mahāntaṁ vibhumātmānam matvā dhīras na śocati: knowing the Lord as the producer of mahat-tattva, the wise person does not lament. (Kaṭha Upaniṣad 2.22) He is just like fire, which being eternally present as one of the five basic elements, appears when jewels or stones are rubbed. This means that he is eternally present in his abodes such as Mathurā. When his devotees in Mathurā like Vasudeva and Ugrasena are afflicted, by his kṛpā-śakti, which is like the friction that produces fire, the Lord becomes visible. Rising like the sun in the eastern direction (Devakī) on Sunrise Mountain (Mathurā) h,e extinguishes the evil persons similar to darkness and satisfies the lotuses (religious persons) and cakravāka birds (devotees in longing) who have been tormented by the darkness, and establishes the rules of dharma. Then he disappears on the Sunset Mountain (Prabhāsa). In this way the example of the sun is a suitable comparison with Kṛṣṇa’s appearance and disappearance. It clearly shows how the Lord is present in his abode and makes his appearance. He is not Nārāyaṇa coming from Vaikuṇṭha, or Kṣīrodakaśāyī coming from the Milk Ocean or Nara-nārāyaṇa or Vāmana coming from their abodes to make an appearance in this world. Though all these forms have their eternal abodes, when Kṛṣṇa appears he comes with all these aṁśas (mahad-aṁśa-yuktaḥ) since they merge within Kṛṣṇa, the Lord of them all (parāvareśaḥ). Thus all doubts are resolved. This is in accordance with the statements of the sages.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.16

↗
మాం ఖేదయత్యేతదజస్య జన్మ- విడమ్బనం యద్వసుదేవగేహే । వ్రజే చ వాసోఽరిభయాదివ స్వయం పురాద్ వ్యవాత్సీద్యదనన్తవీర్య: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
māṁ khedayaty etad ajasya janma-
[maam khedayaty etad ajasya janma-]
viḍambanaṁ yad vasudeva-gehe
[vidambanam yad vasudeva-gehe]
vraje ca vāso ’ri-bhayād iva svayaṁ
[vraje cha vaaso ’ri-bhayaad iva svayam]
purād vyavātsīd yad-ananta-vīryaḥ
[puraad vyavaatseed yad-ananta-veeryah]
mām — to me khedayati — gives me distress etat — this ajasya — of the unborn janma — birth viḍambanam — bewildering yat — that vasudeva-gehe — in the home of Vasudeva vraje — in Vṛndāvana ca — also vāsaḥ — inhabitation ari — enemy bhayāt — because of fear iva — as if svayam — Himself purāt — from Mathurā Purī vyavātsīt — fled yat — one who is ananta-vīryaḥ — unlimitedly powerful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māṁ khedayaty etad ajasya janma-
mām
to me
khedayati
gives me distress
etat
this
ajasya
of the unborn
janma
birth
viḍambanaṁ yad vasudeva-gehe
viḍambanam
bewildering
yat
that
vasudeva-gehe
in the home of Vasudeva
vraje ca vāso ’ri-bhayād iva svayaṁ
vraje
in Vṛndāvana
ca
also
vāsaḥ
inhabitation
ari
enemy
bhayāt
because of fear
iva
as if
svayam
Himself
purād vyavātsīd yad-ananta-vīryaḥ
purāt
from Mathurā Purī
vyavātsīt
fled
yat
one who is
ananta-vīryaḥ
unlimitedly powerful.
When I think of Lord Kṛṣṇa — how He was born in the prison house of Vasudeva although He is unborn, how He went away from His father’s protection to Vraja and lived there incognito out of fear of the enemy, and how, although unlimitedly powerful, He fled from Mathurā in fear — all these bewildering incidents give me distress.

Because Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the original person from whom everything and everyone has emanated — ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ( Bg. 10.8 ), janmādy asya yataḥ ( Vedānta-sūtra 1.1.2) — nothing can be equal to or greater than Him. The Lord is supremely perfect, and whenever He enacts His transcendental pastimes as a son, a rival or an object of enmity, He plays the part so perfectly that even pure devotees like Uddhava are bewildered. For example, Uddhava knew perfectly well that Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is eternally existent and can neither die nor disappear for good, yet he lamented for Lord Kṛṣṇa. All these events are perfect arrangements to give perfection to His supreme glories. It is for enjoyment’s sake. When a father plays with his little son and the father lies down on the floor as if defeated by the son, it is just to give the little son pleasure, and nothing more. Because the Lord is all-powerful, it is possible for Him to adjust opposites such as birth and no birth, power and defeat, fear and fearlessness. A pure devotee knows very well how it is possible for the Lord to adjust opposite things, but he laments for the nondevotees who, not knowing the supreme glories of the Lord, think of Him as imaginary simply because there are so many apparently contradictory statements in the scriptures. Factually there is nothing contradictory; everything is possible when we understand the Lord as the Lord and not as one of us, with all our imperfection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa’s appearance in the prison house of Kaṁsa in miserable circumstances, his stay in Vraja out of fear of enemies, and his leaving Mathurā though he has infinite power used to give me great suffering. I have revealed the truth to you as I have understood it. However, I could not understand this difficult subject before, even though I asked learned people. Thus previously I was full of grief. That is explained in this verse. How is it possible for a person without birth to take birth? There should be no grief if what appears to be a birth is actually only an imitation of birth and is not actual birth. It should be understood that Uddhava intends to show that Kṛṣṇa has both actual birth and an appearance of a birth. His birth in the prison of Kaṁsa gives me pain. This actually means it previously gave me pain. The present tense is often used to express times near to the present. Because his birth pastime even in degraded circumstance should create the greatest joy in his mother, father, friends, and other devotees, why did he as the independent lord not do anything about this? He is naturally full of bliss but why is he known to stay in Vraja out of fear of enemies? The word iva is used to express the fact that he should not have been afraid of Kaṁsa while living in Vraja. Then he fled from Mathurā. Though he has unlimited strength he fled from Kālayavana and others out of fear. Bhīṣma has said: na hy asya karhicid rājan pumān veda vidhitsitam yad vijijṣāsayā yuktā muhyanti kavayo ’pi hi O King, no one can know the plan of Kṛṣṇa. Even though great philosophers inquire exhaustively, they are bewildered. SB 1.9.16 However, when I asked the Lord in private he enlightened me. Now my lamentation has gone.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.17

↗
దునోతి చేత: స్మరతో మమైతద్ యదాహ పాదావభివన్ద్య పిత్రో: । తాతామ్బ కంసాదురుశఙ్కితానాం ప్రసీదతం నోఽకృతనిష్కృతీనామ్ ॥ ౧౭ ॥
dunoti cetaḥ smarato mamaitad
[dunoti chetah smarato mamaitad]
yad āha pādāv abhivandya pitroḥ
[yad aaha paadaav abhivandya pitroh]
tātāmba kaṁsād uru-śaṅkitānāṁ
[taataamba kamsaad uru-shankitaanaam]
prasīdataṁ no ’kṛta-niṣkṛtīnām
[praseedatam no ’krita-nishkriteenaam]
dunoti — it gives me pain cetaḥ — heart smarataḥ — while thinking of mama — my etat — this yat — as much as āha — said pādau — feet abhivandya — worshiping pitroḥ — of the parents tāta — My dear father amba — My dear mother kaṁsāt — out of Kaṁsa’s uru — great śaṅkitānām — of those who are afraid prasīdatam — be pleased with naḥ — Our akṛta — not executed niṣkṛtīnām — duties to serve you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dunoti cetaḥ smarato mamaitad
dunoti
it gives me pain
cetaḥ
heart
smarataḥ
while thinking of
mama
my
etat
this
yad āha pādāv abhivandya pitroḥ
yat
as much as
āha
said
pādau
feet
abhivandya
worshiping
pitroḥ
of the parents
tātāmba kaṁsād uru-śaṅkitānāṁ
tāta
My dear father
amba
My dear mother
kaṁsāt
out of Kaṁsa’s
uru
great
śaṅkitānām
of those who are afraid
prasīdataṁ no ’kṛta-niṣkṛtīnām
prasīdatam
be pleased with
naḥ
Our
akṛta
not executed
niṣkṛtīnām
duties to serve you.
Lord Kṛṣṇa begged pardon from His parents for Their [Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma’s] inability to serve their feet, due to being away from home because of great fear of Kaṁsa. He said, “O mother, O father, please excuse Us for this inability.” All this behavior of the Lord gives me pain at heart.

It appears that Lord Kṛṣṇa and Baladeva were both very greatly afraid of Kaṁsa, and therefore They had to hide Themselves. But if Lord Kṛṣṇa and Baladeva are the Supreme Personality of Godhead, how was it possible that They were afraid of Kaṁsa? Is there any contradiction in such statements? Vasudeva, due to his great appreciation for Kṛṣṇa, wanted to give Him protection. He never thought that Kṛṣṇa was the Supreme Lord and could protect Himself; he thought of Kṛṣṇa as his son. Because Vasudeva was a great devotee of the Lord, he did not like to think that Kṛṣṇa might be killed like his other children. Morally, Vasudeva was bound to deliver Kṛṣṇa to the hands of Kaṁsa because he had promised to turn over all his children. But out of his great love for Kṛṣṇa he broke his promise, and the Lord was very pleased with Vasudeva for his transcendental mentality. He did not want to disturb the intense affection of Vasudeva, and thus He agreed to be carried by His father to the house of Nanda and Yaśodā. And just to test the intense love of Vasudeva, Lord Kṛṣṇa fell down in the waters of the Yamunā while His father was crossing the river. Vasudeva became mad after his child as he tried to recover Him in the midst of the rising river.

These are all glorified pastimes of the Lord, and there is no contradiction in such manifestations. Since Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, He was never afraid of Kaṁsa, but to please His father He agreed to be so. And the most brilliant part of His supreme character was that He begged pardon from His parents for being unable to serve their feet while absent from home because of fear of Kaṁsa. The Lord, whose lotus feet are worshiped by demigods like Brahmā and Śiva, wanted to worship the feet of Vasudeva. Such instruction by the Lord to the world is quite appropriate. Even if one is the Supreme Lord, one must serve his parents. A son is indebted to his parents in so many ways, and it is the duty of the son to serve his parents, however great the son may be. Indirectly, Kṛṣṇa wanted to teach the atheists who do not accept the supreme fatherhood of God, and they may learn from this action how much the Supreme Father has to be respected. Uddhava was simply struck with wonder by such glorious behavior of the Lord, and he was very sorry that he was unable to go with Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Remembering his conduct, my heart fills with pain. Bowing at the feet of his parents, he said, “O father! O mother! Forgive us because, being greatly fearful of Kaṁsa, we could not serve you.” When I remember Kṛṣṇa’s activities my heart produced by karma becomes afflicted. He consoles his parents for his offense. “O father! O mother! Be pleased with the two of us!” The genitive stands for the dual case. We were greatly fearful of Kaṁsa. If this statement is true, it is a contradiction to his position as the Lord, and if it is false, how can the Lord speak untrue words? Thus previously I was in grief. How can I forget his humility conforming to convention, which nourished his sweetness, even though he is the highest form of the Lord? His conduct pierces my heart like an arrow. This is the lamentation of Uddhava.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.18

↗
కో వా అముష్యాఙ్‌ఘ్రి సరోజరేణుం విస్మర్తుమీశీత పుమాన్ విజిఘ్రన్ । యో విస్ఫురద్భ్రూవిటపేన భూమే- ర్భారం కృతాన్తేన తిరశ్చకార ॥ ౧౮ ॥
ko vā amuṣyāṅghri-saroja-reṇuṁ
[ko vaa amushyaanghri-saroja-renum]
vismartum īśīta pumān vijighran
[vismartum eesheeta pumaan vijighran]
yo visphurad-bhrū-viṭapena bhūmer
[yo visphurad-bhroo-vitapena bhoomer]
bhāraṁ kṛtāntena tiraścakāra
[bhaaram kritaantena tirashchakaara]
kaḥ — who else vā — either amuṣya — the Lord’s aṅghri — feet saroja-reṇum — dust of the lotus vismartum — to forget īśīta — may be able pumān — person vijighran — smelling yaḥ — one who visphurat — expanding bhrū-viṭapena — by the leaves of the eyebrows bhūmeḥ — of the earth bhāram — burden kṛta-antena — by deathblows tiraścakāra — executed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ko vā amuṣyāṅghri-saroja-reṇuṁ
vismartum īśīta pumān vijighran
yo visphurad-bhrū-viṭapena bhūmer
bhāraṁ kṛtāntena tiraścakāra
kaḥ
who else
vā
either
amuṣya
the Lord’s
aṅghri
feet
saroja-reṇum
dust of the lotus
vismartum
to forget
īśīta
may be able
pumān
person
vijighran
smelling
yaḥ
one who
visphurat
expanding
bhrū-viṭapena
by the leaves of the eyebrows
bhūmeḥ
of the earth
bhāram
burden
kṛta-antena
by deathblows
tiraścakāra
executed.
Who, after smelling the dust of His lotus feet even once, could ever forget it? Simply by expanding the leaves of His eyebrows, Kṛṣṇa has given the deathblow to those who were burdening the earth.

Lord Kṛṣṇa cannot be accepted as one of the human beings, even though He played the role of an obedient son. His actions were so extraordinary that by the simple raising of His eyebrows He could deliver deathblows to those who were burdening the earth.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After having tasted the dust from his feet, who can forget this person, who removed the burden of the earth by death in the form of his eyebrow? “Those who are not the Lord can also act like this. It is your faith only that he is the Lord.” Three verses answer this doubt. By the quivering buds of his brows (bhrū-viṭapena), which were death personified (kṛtāntena), he removed the burden of the earth. Viśva-koṣa says that viṭapa means a bud, a shrub, or a branch.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.19

↗
ద‍ృష్టా భవద్‍‌భిర్నను రాజసూయే చైద్యస్య కృష్ణం ద్విషతోఽపి సిద్ధి: । యాం యోగిన: సంస్పృహయన్తి సమ్యగ్ యోగేన కస్తద్విరహం సహేత ॥ ౧౯ ॥
dṛṣṭā bhavadbhir nanu rājasūye
[drishtaa bhavadbhir nanu raajasooye]
caidyasya kṛṣṇaṁ dviṣato ’pi siddhiḥ
[chaidyasya krishnam dvishato ’pi siddhih]
yāṁ yoginaḥ saṁspṛhayanti samyag
[yaam yoginah samsprihayanti samyag]
yogena kas tad-virahaṁ saheta
[yogena kas tad-viraham saheta]
dṛṣṭā — it has been seen bhavadbhiḥ — by your good self nanu — of course rājasūye — in the assembly of the rājasūya sacrifice performed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira caidyasya — of the King of Cedi (Śiśupāla) kṛṣṇam — unto Kṛṣṇa dviṣataḥ — envying api — in spite of siddhiḥ — success yām — which yoginaḥ — the yogīs saṁspṛhayanti — verily desire samyak — fully yogena — by performance of yoga kaḥ — who tat — His viraham — separation saheta — can tolerate.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛṣṭā bhavadbhir nanu rājasūye
dṛṣṭā
it has been seen
bhavadbhiḥ
by your good self
nanu
of course
rājasūye
in the assembly of the rājasūya sacrifice performed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira
caidyasya kṛṣṇaṁ dviṣato ’pi siddhiḥ
caidyasya
of the King of Cedi (Śiśupāla)
kṛṣṇam
unto Kṛṣṇa
dviṣataḥ
envying
api
in spite of
siddhiḥ
success
yāṁ yoginaḥ saṁspṛhayanti samyag
yām
which
yoginaḥ
the yogīs
saṁspṛhayanti
verily desire
samyak
fully
yogena kas tad-virahaṁ saheta
yogena
by performance of yoga
kaḥ
who
tat
His
viraham
separation
saheta
can tolerate.
You have personally seen how the King of Cedi [Śiśupāla] achieved success in yoga practice, although he hated Lord Kṛṣṇa. Even the actual yogīs aspire after such success with great interest by performance of their various practices. Who can tolerate separation from Him?

Lord Kṛṣṇa’s causeless mercy was exhibited in the great assembly of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. He was merciful even to His enemy the King of Cedi, who always tried to be an envious rival of the Lord. Because it is not possible to be a bona fide rival of the Lord, the King of Cedi was extremely malicious toward Lord Kṛṣṇa. In this he was like many other asuras, such as Kaṁsa and Jarāsandha. In the open assembly of the rājasūya sacrifice performed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, Śiśupāla insulted Lord Kṛṣṇa, and he was finally killed by the Lord. But it was seen by everyone in the assembly that a light flashed out of the body of the King of Cedi and merged into the body of Lord Kṛṣṇa. This means that Cedirāja achieved the salvation of attaining oneness with the Supreme, which is a perfection most desired by the jṣānīs and yogīs and for which they execute their different types of transcendental activities.

It is a fact that persons who are trying to understand the Supreme Truth by their personal endeavors of mental speculation or mystic powers of yoga achieve the same goal as others who are personally killed by the Lord. Both achieve the salvation of merging in the brahmajyoti rays of the transcendental body of the Lord. The Lord was merciful even to His enemy, and the success of the King of Cedi was observed by everyone who was present in the assembly. Vidura was also present there, and therefore Uddhava referred the incident to his memory.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
At the rājasūya sacrifice you saw how Kṛṣṇa gave liberation to Śiśupāla, even though he held such hatred for the Lord. Yogīs desire to achieve that liberation by practicing yoga. Who can tolerate separation from him? Who did not have direct experience of his powers as the Supreme Lord? Though Śiśupāla hated the Lord, the Lord showed unparalleled mercy to him. Yām stands for yasyai.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.20

↗
తథైవ చాన్యే నరలోకవీరా య ఆహవే కృష్ణముఖారవిన్దమ్ । నేత్రై: పిబన్తో నయనాభిరామం పార్థాస్త్రపూత: పదమాపురస్య ॥ ౨౦ ॥
tathaiva cānye nara-loka-vīrā
[tathaiva chaanye nara-loka-veeraa]
ya āhave kṛṣṇa-mukhāravindam
[ya aahave krishna-mukhaaravindam]
netraiḥ pibanto nayanābhirāmaṁ
[netraih pibanto nayanaabhiraamam]
pārthāstra-pūtaḥ padam āpur asya
[paarthaastra-pootah padam aapur asya]
tathā — as also eva ca — and certainly anye — others nara-loka — human society vīrāḥ — fighters ye — those āhave — on the battlefield (of Kurukṣetra) kṛṣṇa — Lord Kṛṣṇa’s mukha-aravindam — face like a lotus flower netraiḥ — with the eyes pibantaḥ — while seeing nayana-abhirāmam — very pleasing to the eyes pārtha — Arjuna astra-pūtaḥ — purified by arrows padam — abode āpuḥ — achieved asya — of Him.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tathaiva cānye nara-loka-vīrā
tathā
as also
eva ca
and certainly
anye
others
nara-loka
human society
vīrāḥ
fighters
ye
those
ya āhave kṛṣṇa-mukhāravindam
āhave
on the battlefield (of Kurukṣetra)
kṛṣṇa
Lord Kṛṣṇa’s
mukha-aravindam
face like a lotus flower
netraiḥ pibanto nayanābhirāmaṁ
netraiḥ
with the eyes
pibantaḥ
while seeing
nayana-abhirāmam
very pleasing to the eyes
pārthāstra-pūtaḥ padam āpur asya
pārtha
Arjuna
astra-pūtaḥ
purified by arrows
padam
abode
āpuḥ
achieved
asya
of Him.
Certainly others who were fighters on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra were purified by the onslaught of Arjuna’s arrows, and while seeing the lotuslike face of Kṛṣṇa, so pleasing to the eyes, they achieved the abode of the Lord.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, appears in this world for two missionary purposes: to deliver the faithful and to annihilate the miscreants. But because the Lord is absolute, His two different kinds of actions, although apparently different, are ultimately one and the same. His annihilation of a person like Śiśupāla is as auspicious as His actions for the protection of the faithful. All the warriors who fought against Arjuna but who were able to see the lotuslike face of the Lord on the battlefront achieved the abode of the Lord, exactly as the devotees of the Lord do. The words “pleasing to the eyes of the seer” are very significant. When the warriors from the other side of the battlefield saw Lord Kṛṣṇa at the front, they appreciated His beauty, and their dormant instinct of love of God was awakened. Śiśupāla saw the Lord also, but he saw Him as his enemy, and his love was not awakened. Therefore Śiśupāla achieved oneness with the Lord by merging in the impersonal glare of His body, called the brahmajyoti. Others, who were in the marginal position, being neither friends nor enemies but slightly in love of Godhead by appreciating the beauty of His face, were at once promoted to the spiritual planets, the Vaikuṇṭhas. The Lord’s personal abode is called Goloka Vṛndāvana, and the abodes where His plenary expansions reside are called the Vaikuṇṭhas, where the Lord is present as Nārāyaṇa. Love of Godhead is dormant in every living entity, and the entire process of devotional service unto the Lord is meant for awakening this dormant eternal love of Godhead. But there are degrees of such transcendental awakening. Those whose love of God is awakened to the fullest extent go back to the Goloka Vṛndāvana planet in the spiritual sky, whereas persons who have just awakened to love of Godhead by accident or association are transferred to the Vaikuṇṭha planets. Essentially there is no material difference between Goloka and Vaikuṇṭha, but in the Vaikuṇṭhas the Lord is served in unlimited opulence, whereas in Goloka the Lord is served in natural affection.

This love of God is awakened by the association of pure devotees of the Lord. Here the word pārthāstra-pūtaḥ is significant. Those who saw the beautiful face of the Lord on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra were purified first by Arjuna when he made his onslaught with arrows. The Lord appeared for the mission of diminishing the burden of the world, and Arjuna was assisting the Lord by fighting on His behalf. Arjuna personally declined to fight, and the whole instruction of the Bhagavad-gītā was given to Arjuna to engage him in the fight. As a pure devotee of the Lord, Arjuna agreed to fight in preference to his own decision, and thus Arjuna fought to assist the Lord in His mission of diminishing the burden of the world. All the activities of a pure devotee are executed on behalf of the Lord because a pure devotee of the Lord has nothing to do for his personal interest. Arjuna’s killing was as good as killing by the Lord Himself. As soon as Arjuna shot an arrow at an enemy, that enemy became purified of all material contaminations and became eligible to be transferred to the spiritual sky. Those warriors who appreciated the lotus feet of the Lord and saw His face at the front had their dormant love of God awakened, and thus they were transferred at once to Vaikuṇṭhaloka, not to the impersonal state of brahmajyoti, as was Śiśupāla. Śiśupāla died without appreciating the Lord, while others died with appreciation of the Lord. Both were transferred to the spiritual sky, but those who awakened to love of God were transferred to the planets of the transcendental sky.

Uddhava seemingly lamented that his own position was less than that of the warriors on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra because they had attained to Vaikuṇṭha whereas he remained to lament the disappearance of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Others, the best among warriors, who on the battlefield drank with their eyes the lotus face of Kṛṣṇa, delight to the eyes, and who were purified by the arrows of Arjuna, attained the abode of Kṛṣṇa. Having described Kṛṣṇa’s mercy which gives liberation to those who hated him, Uddhava now describes his mercy in giving prema to others who were neutral. In mentioning that they drank with their eyes, Uddhava laments his one position. “They were fortunate, and I am unfortunate, because by drinking the form of the Lord with their eyes, they attained the Lord.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.21

↗
స్వయం త్వసామ్యాతిశయస్త్ర్యధీశ: స్వారాజ్యలక్ష్మ్యాప్తసమస్తకామ: । బలిం హరద్‍‌భిశ్చిరలోకపాలై: కిరీటకోట్యేడితపాదపీఠ: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
svayaṁ tv asāmyātiśayas tryadhīśaḥ
[svayam tv asaamyaatishayas tryadheeshah]
svārājya-lakṣmy-āpta-samasta-kāmaḥ
[svaaraajya-lakshmy-aapta-samasta-kaamah]
baliṁ haradbhiś cira-loka-pālaiḥ
[balim haradbhish chira-loka-paalaih]
kirīṭa-koṭyeḍita-pāda-pīṭhaḥ
[kireeta-kotyedita-paada-peethah]
svayam — Himself tu — but asāmya — unique atiśayaḥ — greater tri-adhīśaḥ — Lord of the three svārājya — independent supremacy lakṣmī — fortune āpta — achieved samasta-kāmaḥ — all desires balim — worshiping paraphernalia haradbhiḥ — offered by cira-loka-pālaiḥ — by the eternal maintainers of the order of creation kirīṭa-koṭyā — millions of helmets iḍita-pāda-pīṭhaḥ — feet honored by prayers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
svayaṁ tv asāmyātiśayas tryadhīśaḥ
svayam
Himself
tu
but
asāmya
unique
atiśayaḥ
greater
tri-adhīśaḥ
Lord of the three
svārājya-lakṣmy-āpta-samasta-kāmaḥ
svārājya
independent supremacy
lakṣmī
fortune
āpta
achieved
samasta-kāmaḥ
all desires
baliṁ haradbhiś cira-loka-pālaiḥ
balim
worshiping paraphernalia
haradbhiḥ
offered by
cira-loka-pālaiḥ
by the eternal maintainers of the order of creation
kirīṭa-koṭyeḍita-pāda-pīṭhaḥ
kirīṭa-koṭyā
millions of helmets
iḍita-pāda-pīṭhaḥ
feet honored by prayers.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the Lord of all kinds of threes and is independently supreme by achievement of all kinds of fortune. He is worshiped by the eternal maintainers of the creation, who offer Him the paraphernalia of worship by touching their millions of helmets to His feet.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is so mild and merciful, as described in the above verses, and yet He is the Lord of all kinds of threes. He is the Supreme Lord of the three worlds, the three qualities of material nature and the three puruṣas (Kāraṇodakaśāyī, Garbhodakaśāyī and Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu). There are innumerable universes, and in each and every universe there are different manifestations of Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Rudra. Besides that, there is the Śeṣa-mūrti who bears all the universes on His hoods. And Lord Kṛṣṇa is the Lord of all of them. As the incarnation of Manu, He is the original source of all Manus in innumerable universes. Each universe has manifestations of 504,000 Manus. He is the Lord of the three principal potencies, namely cit-śakti, māyā-śakti and taṭasthā-śakti, and He is the complete master of six kinds of fortune — wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge and renunciation. There is none who can excel Him in any matter of enjoyment, and certainly there is no one greater than Him. No one is equal to or greater than Him. It is the duty of everyone, whoever and wherever one may be, to surrender completely unto Him. It is not wonderful, therefore, that all the transcendental controllers surrender to Him and make all offerings of worship.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
No one is equal to him or superior to him. He is master of the three energies and three Viṣṇus. All his desires are fulfilled by Lakṣmī and his rulership over his devotees, pastimes and qualities. His feet are praised by the sound by ten million crowns of the devatās offering respects while presenting gifts. In two verses Uddhava laments how he could forget the sweetness of the Lord, his willingness to come under the control of his devotees. Though he is the master of Brahmā and other devatās and the master of Viṣṇu forms as well, he becomes the servant of Ugrasena. He has no equal what to speak of a superior (asāmyātiśayaḥ). What is the reason? He is the lord of the three puruṣāvatāras, and the lord of cic-cakti, jīva-śakti and māyā-śakti. All his desires are fulfilled by Lakṣmī and his rulership with his expansions, his devotees, śaktis, pastimes, powers and sweetness. His feet are praised (edita) by ten million crowns of long lasting protectors of the directions, by Brahmās acting as creators in ten million universes, by Viṣṇus protecting the universes and by Śivas destroying the universes, and by Śeṣas holding up the universes. The sound of the crowns when they offer respects is the praise.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.22

↗
తత్తస్య కైఙ్కర్యమలం భృతాన్నో విగ్లాపయత్యఙ్గ యదుగ్రసేనమ్ । తిష్ఠన్నిషణ్ణం పరమేష్ఠిధిష్ణ్యే న్యబోధయద్దేవ నిధారయేతి ॥ ౨౨ ॥
tat tasya kaiṅkaryam alaṁ bhṛtān no
[tat tasya kainkaryam alam bhritaan no]
viglāpayaty aṅga yad ugrasenam
[viglaapayaty anga yad ugrasenam]
tiṣṭhan niṣaṇṇaṁ parameṣṭhi-dhiṣṇye
[tishthan nishannam parameshthi-dhishnye]
nyabodhayad deva nidhārayeti
[nyabodhayad deva nidhaarayeti]
tat — therefore tasya — His kaiṅkaryam — service alam — of course bhṛtān — the servitors naḥ — us viglāpayati — gives pain aṅga — O Vidura yat — as much as ugrasenam — unto King Ugrasena tiṣṭhan — being seated niṣaṇṇam — waiting upon Him parameṣṭhi-dhiṣṇye — on the royal throne nyabodhayat — submitted deva — addressing my Lord nidhāraya — please know it iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat tasya kaiṅkaryam alaṁ bhṛtān no
tat
therefore
tasya
His
kaiṅkaryam
service
alam
of course
bhṛtān
the servitors
viglāpayaty aṅga yad ugrasenam
naḥ
us
viglāpayati
gives pain
tiṣṭhan niṣaṇṇaṁ parameṣṭhi-dhiṣṇye
aṅga
O Vidura
nyabodhayad deva nidhārayeti
yat
as much as
ugrasenam
unto King Ugrasena
tiṣṭhan
being seated
niṣaṇṇam
waiting upon Him
parameṣṭhi-dhiṣṇye
on the royal throne
nyabodhayat
submitted
deva
addressing my Lord
nidhāraya
please know it
iti
thus.
Therefore, O Vidura, does it not pain us, His servitors, when we remember that He [Lord Kṛṣṇa] used to stand before King Ugrasena, who was sitting on the royal throne, and used to submit explanations before him, saying, “O My lord, please let it be known to you”?

Lord Kṛṣṇa’s gentle behavior before His so-called superiors such as His father, grandfather and elder brother, His amiable behavior with His so-called wives, friends and contemporaries, His behavior as a child before His mother Yaśodā, and His naughty dealings with His young girlfriends cannot bewilder a pure devotee like Uddhava. Others, who are not devotees, are bewildered by such behavior of the Lord, who acted just like a human being. This bewilderment is explained by the Lord Himself in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) as follows:

avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam paraṁ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram

Persons with a poor fund of knowledge belittle the Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa, not knowing His exalted position as the Lord of everything. In Bhagavad-gītā the Lord has explained His position clearly, but the demoniac, atheistic student squeezes out an interpretation to suit his own purpose and misleads unfortunate followers into the same mentality. Such unfortunate persons merely pick up some slogans from the great book of knowledge, but are unable to estimate the Lord as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Pure devotees like Uddhava, however, are never misled by such atheistic opportunists.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! Kṛṣṇa’s acting as a servant of Ugrasena gives us servants great pain. Standing in from of Ugrasena sitting on the king’s throne he informed him, “O king of kings! Please establish me in your service.” This verse describes Kṛṣṇa as a servant of Ugrasena. O Vidura (aṅga)! Standing in from of Ugrasena seated (niṣaṇṇam) on the king’s throne, Kṛṣṇa informed him, “O king of kings (deva), please establish me in your service.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.23

↗
అహో బకీ యం స్తనకాలకూటం జిఘాంసయాపాయయదప్యసాధ్వీ । లేభే గతిం ధాత్ర్యుచితాం తతోఽన్యం కం వా దయాలుం శరణం వ్రజేమ ॥ ౨౩ ॥
aho bakī yaṁ stana-kāla-kūṭaṁ
[aho bakee yam stana-kaala-kootam]
jighāṁsayāpāyayad apy asādhvī
[jighaamsayaapaayayad apy asaadhvee]
lebhe gatiṁ dhātry-ucitāṁ tato ’nyaṁ
[lebhe gatim dhaatry-uchitaam tato ’nyam]
kaṁ vā dayāluṁ śaraṇaṁ vrajema
[kam vaa dayaalum sharanam vrajema]
aho — alas bakī — the she-demon (Pūtanā) yam — whom stana — of her breast kāla — deadly kūṭam — poison jighāṁsayā — out of envy apāyayat — nourished api — although asādhvī — unfaithful lebhe — achieved gatim — destination dhātrī-ucitām — just suitable for the nurse tataḥ — beyond whom anyam — other kam — who else vā — certainly dayālum — merciful śaraṇam — shelter vrajema — shall I take.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho bakī yaṁ stana-kāla-kūṭaṁ
aho
alas
bakī
the she-demon (Pūtanā)
yam
whom
stana
of her breast
kāla
deadly
kūṭam
poison
jighāṁsayāpāyayad apy asādhvī
jighāṁsayā
out of envy
apāyayat
nourished
api
although
asādhvī
unfaithful
lebhe gatiṁ dhātry-ucitāṁ tato ’nyaṁ
lebhe
achieved
gatim
destination
dhātrī-ucitām
just suitable for the nurse
tataḥ
beyond whom
kaṁ vā dayāluṁ śaraṇaṁ vrajema
anyam
other
kam
who else
vā
certainly
dayālum
merciful
śaraṇam
shelter
vrajema
shall I take.
Alas, how shall I take shelter of one more merciful than He who granted the position of mother to a she-demon [Pūtanā] although she was unfaithful and she prepared deadly poison to be sucked from her breast?

Here is an example of the extreme mercy of the Lord, even to His enemy. It is said that a noble man accepts the good qualities of a person of doubtful character, just as one accepts nectar from a stock of poison. In His babyhood, He was administered deadly poison by Pūtanā, a she-demon who tried to kill the wonderful baby. And because she was a demon, it was impossible for her to know that the Supreme Lord, even though playing the part of a baby, was no one less than the same Supreme Personality of Godhead. His value as the Supreme Lord did not diminish upon His becoming a baby to please His devotee Yaśodā. The Lord may assume the form of a baby or a shape other than that of a human being, but it doesn’t make the slightest difference; He is always the same Supreme. A living creature, however powerful he may become by dint of severe penance, can never become equal to the Supreme Lord.

Lord Kṛṣṇa accepted the motherhood of Pūtanā because she pretended to be an affectionate mother, allowing Kṛṣṇa to suck her breast. The Lord accepts the least qualification of the living entity and awards him the highest reward. That is the standard of His character. Therefore, who but the Lord can be the ultimate shelter?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! Evil Pūtanā, who offered her poisonous breast to Kṛṣṇa to drink with the intention of killing him, attained the position of a nurse in the spiritual world. How else is so merciful? I surrender to him! Remembering Kṛṣṇa’s sweet mercy to those who wanted to harm him when he first appeared in the world, Uddhava laments. Even though Pūtanā who pretended to have sentiments of a mother gave him poison to kill him, she attained a position in Goloka similar to the nurses of Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa has two real nurses named Ambikā and Kalimbā. Though Pūtanā only had the dress of a devotee, she attained love suitable to a devotee. Though she hated the Lord, he made her a special example. This incident shows Kṛṣṇa’s quality of giving liberation and bhakti to even those who hate him.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.24

↗
మన్యేఽసురాన్ భాగవతాంస్త్ర్యధీశే సంరమ్భమార్గాభినివిష్టచిత్తాన్ । యే సంయుగేఽచక్షత తార్క్ష్యపుత్ర- మంసే సునాభాయుధమాపతన్తమ్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
manye ’surān bhāgavatāṁs tryadhīśe
[manye ’suraan bhaagavataams tryadheeshe]
saṁrambha-mārgābhiniviṣṭa-cittān
[samrambha-maargaabhinivishta-chittaan]
ye saṁyuge ’cakṣata tārkṣya-putram
[ye samyuge ’chakshata taarkshya-putram]
aṁse sunābhāyudham āpatantam
[amse sunaabhaayudham aapatantam]
manye — I think asurān — the demons bhāgavatān — great devotees tri-adhīśe — unto the Lord of the threes saṁrambha — enmity mārga — by the way of abhiniviṣṭa-cittān — absorbed in thought ye — those saṁyuge — in the fight acakṣata — could see tārkṣya-putram — Garuḍa, the carrier of the Lord aṁse — on the shoulder sunābha — the wheel āyudham — one who carries the weapon āpatantam — coming forward.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
manye ’surān bhāgavatāṁs tryadhīśe
manye
I think
asurān
the demons
bhāgavatān
great devotees
tri-adhīśe
unto the Lord of the threes
saṁrambha-mārgābhiniviṣṭa-cittān
saṁrambha
enmity
mārga
by the way of
abhiniviṣṭa-cittān
absorbed in thought
ye saṁyuge ’cakṣata tārkṣya-putram
ye
those
saṁyuge
in the fight
acakṣata
could see
tārkṣya-putram
Garuḍa, the carrier of the Lord
aṁse
on the shoulder
aṁse sunābhāyudham āpatantam
sunābha
the wheel
āyudham
one who carries the weapon
āpatantam
coming forward.
I consider the demons, who are inimical toward the Lord, to be more than the devotees because while fighting with the Lord, absorbed in thoughts of enmity, they are able to see the Lord carried on the shoulder of Garuḍa, the son of Tārkṣya [Kaśyapa], and carrying the wheel weapon in His hand.

The asuras who fought against the Lord face to face got salvation due to their being killed by the Lord. This salvation of the demons is not due to their being devotees of the Lord; it is because of the Lord’s causeless mercy. Anyone who is slightly in touch with the Lord, somehow or other, is greatly benefited, even to the point of salvation, due to the excellence of the Lord. He is so kind that He awards salvation even to His enemies because they come into contact with Him and are indirectly absorbed in Him by their inimical thoughts. Actually, the demons can never be equal to the pure devotees, but Uddhava was thinking in that way because of his feelings of separation. He was thinking that at the last stage of his life he might not be able to see the Lord face to face as did the demons. The fact is that the devotees who are always engaged in the devotional service of the Lord in transcendental love are rewarded many hundreds and thousands of times more than the demons by being elevated to the spiritual planets, where they remain with the Lord in eternal, blissful existence. The demons and impersonalists are awarded the facility of merging in the brahmajyoti effulgence of the Lord, whereas the devotees are admitted into the spiritual planets. For comparison, one can just imagine the difference between floating in space and residing in one of the planets in the sky. The pleasure of the living entities on the planets is greater than that of those who have no body and who merge with the molecules of the sun’s rays. The impersonalists, therefore, are no more favored than the enemies of the Lord; rather, they are both on the same level of spiritual salvation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I consider that the demons who had anger towards the Lord of three energies to be devotees, because during the battle they saw Garuḍa approaching with Kṛṣṇa, carrying his cakra, on his shoulder. Uddhava’s lamentation is here shown as not the final conclusion. Uddhava considers the demons whose hearts were filled with anger (samrambha) to be devotees because when they died they attained direct vision of the Lord and attained his lotus feet. We on the other hand have not attained this. We will die without seeing Kṛṣṇa (since he has disappeared) and thus will not attain his abode. They saw Garuḍa (tārkṣya-putram), son of Kaśyapa, coming towards them (āpatantam) with the Lord, holder of the cakra (sunābhāyudham) on his shoulders.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.25

↗
వసుదేవస్య దేవక్యాం జాతో భోజేన్ద్రబన్ధనే । చికీర్షుర్భగవానస్యా: శమజేనాభియాచిత: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
vasudevasya devakyāṁ
[vasudevasya devakyaam]
jāto bhojendra-bandhane
[jaato bhojendra-bandhane]
cikīrṣur bhagavān asyāḥ
[chikeershur bhagavaan asyaah]
śam ajenābhiyācitaḥ
[sham ajenaabhiyaachitah]
vasudevasya — of the wife of Vasudeva devakyām — in the womb of Devakī jātaḥ — born of bhoja-indra — of the King of the Bhojas bandhane — in the prison house cikīrṣuḥ — for doing bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead asyāḥ — of the earth śam — welfare ajena — by Brahmā abhiyācitaḥ — being prayed for.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vasudevasya devakyāṁ
vasudevasya
of the wife of Vasudeva
devakyām
in the womb of Devakī
jāto bhojendra-bandhane
jātaḥ
born of
bhoja-indra
of the King of the Bhojas
bandhane
in the prison house
cikīrṣur bhagavān asyāḥ
cikīrṣuḥ
for doing
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
asyāḥ
of the earth
śam ajenābhiyācitaḥ
śam
welfare
ajena
by Brahmā
abhiyācitaḥ
being prayed for.
The Personality of Godhead, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, being prayed to by Brahmā to bring welfare to the earth, was begotten by Vasudeva in the womb of his wife Devakī in the prison of the King of Bhoja.

Although there is no difference between the Lord’s pastimes of appearance and disappearance, the devotees of the Lord do not generally discuss the subject matter of His disappearance. Vidura inquired indirectly from Uddhava about the incident of the Lord’s disappearance by asking him to relate kṛṣṇa-kathā, or topics on the history of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Thus Uddhava began the topics from the very beginning of His appearance as the son of Vasudeva and Devakī in the prison of Kaṁsa, the King of the Bhojas, at Mathurā. The Lord has no business in this world, but when He is so requested by devotees like Brahmā, He descends to the earth for the welfare of the entire universe. This is stated in Bhagavad-gītā (4.8) : paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ vināśāya ca duṣkṛtām/ dharma-saṁsthāpanārthāya sambhavāmi yuge yuge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Born in the womb of Devakī to Vasudeva in the prison of Kaṁsa, Kṛṣṇa desired to give happiness to the earth at the request of Brahmā. In order to answer Vidura’s questions, Uddhava had to tell him about the disappearance of Kṛṣṇa. Now he attempts to explain this sad pastime along with the joyous pastimes. He was born in the prison (bandhane) of Kaṁsa. He desired to give happiness (śam) to the earth (asyāḥ) at the request of Brahmā (ajena).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.26

↗
తతో నన్దవ్రజమిత: పిత్రా కంసాద్విబిభ్యతా । ఏకాదశ సమాస్తత్ర గూఢార్చి: సబలోఽవసత్ ॥ ౨౬ ॥
tato nanda-vrajam itaḥ
[tato nanda-vrajam itah]
pitrā kaṁsād vibibhyatā
[pitraa kamsaad vibibhyataa]
ekādaśa samās tatra
[ekaadasha samaas tatra]
gūḍhārciḥ sa-balo ’vasat
[goodhaarchih sa-balo ’vasat]
tataḥ — thereafter nanda-vrajam — cow pastures of Nanda Mahārāja itaḥ — being brought up pitrā — by His father kaṁsāt — from Kaṁsa vibibhyatā — being afraid of ekādaśa — eleven samāḥ — years tatra — therein gūḍha-arciḥ — covered fire sa-balaḥ — with Baladeva avasat — resided.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato nanda-vrajam itaḥ
tataḥ
thereafter
nanda-vrajam
cow pastures of Nanda Mahārāja
itaḥ
being brought up
pitrā kaṁsād vibibhyatā
pitrā
by His father
kaṁsāt
from Kaṁsa
vibibhyatā
being afraid of
ekādaśa samās tatra
ekādaśa
eleven
samāḥ
years
tatra
therein
gūḍhārciḥ sa-balo ’vasat
gūḍha-arciḥ
covered fire
sa-balaḥ
with Baladeva
avasat
resided.
Thereafter, His father, being afraid of Kaṁsa, brought Him to the cow pastures of Mahārāja Nanda, and there He lived for eleven years like a covered flame with His elder brother, Baladeva.

There was no necessity of the Lord’s being dispatched to the house of Nanda Mahārāja out of fear of Kaṁsa’s determination to kill Him as soon as He appeared. It is the business of the asuras to try to kill the Supreme Personality of Godhead or to prove by all means that there is no God or that Kṛṣṇa is an ordinary human being and not God. Lord Kṛṣṇa is not affected by such determination of men of Kaṁsa’s class, but in order to play the role of a child He agreed to be carried by His father to the cow pastures of Nanda Mahārāja because Vasudeva was afraid of Kaṁsa. Nanda Mahārāja was due to receive Him as his child, and Yaśodāmayī was also to enjoy the childhood pastimes of the Lord, and therefore to fulfill everyone’s desire, He was carried from Mathurā to Vṛndāvana just after His appearance in the prison house of Kaṁsa. He lived there for eleven years and completed all His fascinating pastimes of childhood, boyhood and adolescence with His elder brother, Lord Baladeva, His first expansion. Vasudeva’s thought of protecting Kṛṣṇa from the wrath of Kaṁsa is part of a transcendental relationship. The Lord enjoys more when someone takes Him as his subordinate son who needs the protection of a father than He does when someone accepts Him as the Supreme Lord. He is the father of everyone, and He protects everyone, but when His devotee takes it for granted that the Lord is to be protected by the devotee’s care, it is a transcendental joy for the Lord. Thus when Vasudeva, out of fear of Kaṁsa, carried Him to Vṛndāvana, the Lord enjoyed it; otherwise, He had no fear from Kaṁsa or anyone else.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His father, afraid of Kaṁsa, brought him to Vraja and for eleven years he lived there with Balarāma, like a covered flame. He was brought (itaḥ) by his father to Vraja. He lived there for eleven years (samāḥ). He is described as a covered flame because he performed his bālya, paugaṇḍa and kaiśora pastimes there, unknown to Kaṁsa and others. Or he can be called a covered flame because he covered his qualities as supreme lord with sweetness.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.27

↗
పరీతో వత్సపైర్వత్సాంశ్చారయన్ వ్యహరద్విభు: । యమునోపవనే కూజద్‌ద్విజసంకులితాఙ్‌ఘ్రిపే ॥ ౨౭ ॥
parīto vatsapair vatsāṁś
[pareeto vatsapair vatsaamsh]
cārayan vyaharad vibhuḥ
[chaarayan vyaharad vibhuh]
yamunopavane kūjad-
[yamunopavane koojad-]
dvija-saṅkulitāṅghripe
[dvija-sankulitaanghripe]
parītaḥ — surrounded by vatsapaiḥ — cowherd boys vatsān — calves cārayan — herding, tending vyaharat — enjoyed by traveling vibhuḥ — the Almighty yamunā — the Yamunā river upavane — gardens on the shore kūjat — vibrated by the voice dvija — the twice-born birds saṅkulita — densely situated aṅghripe — in the trees.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
parīto vatsapair vatsāṁś
parītaḥ
surrounded by
vatsapaiḥ
cowherd boys
vatsān
calves
cārayan vyaharad vibhuḥ
cārayan
herding, tending
vyaharat
enjoyed by traveling
vibhuḥ
the Almighty
yamunopavane kūjad-
yamunā
the Yamunā river
upavane
gardens on the shore
kūjat
vibrated by the voice
dvija-saṅkulitāṅghripe
dvija
the twice-born birds
saṅkulita
densely situated
aṅghripe
in the trees.
In His childhood, the Almighty Lord was surrounded by cowherd boys and calves, and thus He traveled on the shore of the Yamunā river, through gardens densely covered with trees and filled with vibrations of chirping birds.

Nanda Mahārāja was a landholder for King Kaṁsa, but because by caste he was a vaiśya, a member of the mercantile and agricultural community, he maintained thousands of cows. It is the duty of the vaiśyas to give protection to the cows, just as the kṣatriyas are to give protection to the human beings. Because the Lord was a child, He was put in charge of the calves with His cowherd boyfriends. These cowherd boys were great ṛṣis and yogīs in their previous births, and after many such pious births, they gained the association of the Lord and could play with Him on equal terms. Such cowherd boys never cared to know who Kṛṣṇa was, but they played with Him as a most intimate and lovable friend. They were so fond of the Lord that at night they would only think of the next morning when they would be able to meet the Lord and go together to the forests for cowherding.

The forests on the shore of the Yamunā are all beautiful gardens full of trees of mango, jackfruit, apples, guava, oranges, grapes, berries, palmfruit and so many other plants and fragrant flowers. And because the forest was on the bank of the Yamunā, naturally there were ducks, cranes and peacocks on the branches of the trees. All these trees and birds and beasts were pious living entities born in the transcendental abode of Vṛndāvana just to give pleasure to the Lord and His eternal associates, the cowherd boys.

While playing like a small child with His associates, the Lord killed many demons, including Aghāsura, Bakāsura, Pralambāsura and Gardabhāsura. Although He appeared at Vṛndāvana just as a boy, He was actually like the covered flames of a fire. As a small particle of fire can kindle a great fire with fuel, so the Lord killed all these great demons, beginning from His babyhood in the house of Nanda Mahārāja. The land of Vṛndāvana, the Lord’s childhood playground, still remains today, and anyone who visits these places enjoys the same transcendental bliss, although the Lord is not physically visible to our imperfect eyes. Lord Caitanya recommended this land of the Lord as identical with the Lord and therefore worshipable by the devotees. This instruction is taken up especially by the followers of Lord Caitanya known as the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavas. And because the land is identical with the Lord, devotees like Uddhava and Vidura visited these places five thousand years ago in order to have direct contact with the Lord, visible or not visible. Thousands of devotees of the Lord are still wandering in these sacred places of Vṛndāvana, and all of them are preparing themselves to go back home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Herding the calves and surrounded by his young friends, the Lord played on the bank of the Yamunā in forests whose trees were filled with chirping birds. The forests had trees (aṅghri-pa) filled with chirping birds (dvija).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.28

↗
కౌమారీం దర్శయంశ్చేష్టాం ప్రేక్షణీయాం వ్రజౌకసామ్ । రుదన్నివ హసన్ముగ్ధబాలసింహావలోకన: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
kaumārīṁ darśayaṁś ceṣṭāṁ
[kaumaareem darshayamsh cheshtaam]
prekṣaṇīyāṁ vrajaukasām
[prekshaneeyaam vrajaukasaam]
rudann iva hasan mugdha-
[rudann iva hasan mugdha-]
bāla-siṁhāvalokanaḥ
[baala-simhaavalokanah]
kaumārīm — just suitable to childhood darśayan — while showing ceṣṭām — activities prekṣaṇīyām — worthy to be seen vraja-okasām — by the inhabitants of the land of Vṛndāvana rudan — crying iva — just like hasan — laughing mugdha — struck with wonder bāla-siṁha — lion cub avalokanaḥ — looking like that.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaumārīṁ darśayaṁś ceṣṭāṁ
kaumārīm
just suitable to childhood
darśayan
while showing
ceṣṭām
activities
prekṣaṇīyāṁ vrajaukasām
prekṣaṇīyām
worthy to be seen
vraja-okasām
by the inhabitants of the land of Vṛndāvana
rudann iva hasan mugdha-
rudan
crying
iva
just like
hasan
laughing
mugdha
struck with wonder
bāla-siṁhāvalokanaḥ
bāla-siṁha
lion cub
avalokanaḥ
looking like that.
When the Lord displayed His activities just suitable for childhood, He was visible only to the residents of Vṛndāvana. Sometimes He would cry and sometimes laugh, just like a child, and while so doing He would appear like a lion cub.

If anyone wants to enjoy the childhood pastimes of the Lord, then he has to follow in the footsteps of the residents of Vraja like Nanda, Upananda and other parental inhabitants. A child may insist on having something and cry like anything to get it, disturbing the whole neighborhood, and then immediately after achieving the desired thing, he laughs. Such crying and laughing is enjoyable to the parents and elderly members of the family, so the Lord would simultaneously cry and laugh in this way and merge His devotee parents in the humor of transcendental pleasure. These incidents are enjoyable only by the residents of Vraja like Nanda Mahārāja, and not by the impersonalist worshipers of Brahman or Paramātmā. Sometimes when attacked in the forest by demons, Kṛṣṇa would appear struck with wonder, but He looked on them like the cub of a lion and killed them. His childhood companions would also be struck with wonder, and when they came back home they would narrate the story to their parents, and everyone would appreciate the qualities of their Kṛṣṇa. Child Kṛṣṇa did not belong only to His parents, Nanda and Yaśodā; He was the son of all the elderly inhabitants of Vṛndāvana and the friend of all contemporary boys and girls. Everyone loved Kṛṣṇa. He was the life and soul of everyone, including the animals, the cows and the calves.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Showing his attractive infant pastimes to the people of Vraja, he would pretend to weep to get what he wanted and laugh when he got those things. When demons attacked, he appeared like a young lion, showing his bravery in spite of his fear. Kṛṣṇa displayed crying like a child without the typical symptoms of tears (rudan iva). In front of the elder women he would seem to cry, stubbornly asking for things that should be given to him, and then when he got them he would smile and laugh. When fierce demons came to Vraja, Kṛṣṇa appeared just like a young lion who, though afraid of fierce animals in the forest, threatens them by showing his bravery. This caused anxiety in his parents who had affection for him.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.29

↗
స ఏవ గోధనం లక్ష్మ్యా నికేతం సితగోవృషమ్ । చారయన్ననుగాన్ గోపాన్ రణద్వేణురరీరమత్ ॥ ౨౯ ॥
sa eva go-dhanaṁ lakṣmyā
[sa eva go-dhanam lakshmyaa]
niketaṁ sita-go-vṛṣam
[niketam sita-go-vrisham]
cārayann anugān gopān
[chaarayann anugaan gopaan]
raṇad-veṇur arīramat
[ranad-venur areeramat]
saḥ — He (Lord Kṛṣṇa) eva — certainly go-dhanam — the treasure of cows lakṣmyāḥ — by opulence niketam — reservoir sita-go-vṛṣam — beautiful cows and bulls cārayan — herding anugān — the followers gopān — cowherd boys raṇat — blowing veṇuḥ — flute arīramat — enlivened.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eva go-dhanaṁ lakṣmyā
saḥ
He (Lord Kṛṣṇa)
eva
certainly
go-dhanam
the treasure of cows
lakṣmyāḥ
by opulence
niketaṁ sita-go-vṛṣam
niketam
reservoir
sita-go-vṛṣam
beautiful cows and bulls
cārayann anugān gopān
cārayan
herding
anugān
the followers
gopān
cowherd boys
raṇad-veṇur arīramat
raṇat
blowing
veṇuḥ
flute
arīramat
enlivened.
While herding the very beautiful bulls, the Lord, who was the reservoir of all opulence and fortune, used to blow His flute, and thus He enlivened His faithful followers, the cowherd boys.

As He grew to six and seven years old, the Lord was given charge of looking after the cows and bulls in the grazing grounds. He was the son of a well-to-do landholder who owned hundreds and thousands of cows, and according to Vedic economics, one is considered to be a rich man by the strength of his store of grains and cows. With only these two things, cows and grain, humanity can solve its eating problem. Human society needs only sufficient grain and sufficient cows to solve its economic problems. All other things but these two are artificial necessities created by man to kill his valuable life at the human level and waste his time in things which are not needed. Lord Kṛṣṇa, as the teacher of human society, personally showed by His acts that the mercantile community, or the vaiśyas, should herd cows and bulls and thus give protection to the valuable animals. According to smṛti regulation, the cow is the mother and the bull the father of the human being. The cow is the mother because just as one sucks the breast of one’s mother, human society takes cow’s milk. Similarly, the bull is the father of human society because the father earns for the children just as the bull tills the ground to produce food grains. Human society will kill its spirit of life by killing the father and the mother. It is mentioned herein that the beautiful cows and bulls were of various checkered colors — red, black, green, yellow, ash, etc. And because of their colors and healthy smiling features, the atmosphere was enlivening.

Over and above all, the Lord used to play His celebrated flute. The sound vibrated by His flute would give His friends such transcendental pleasure that they would forget all the talks of brahmānanda, which is so praised by the impersonalists. These cowherd boys, as will be explained by Śukadeva Gosvāmī, were living entities who had accumulated heaps of pious acts and thus were enjoying with the Lord in person and were hearing His transcendental flute. The Brahma-saṁhitā (5.30) confirms the Lord’s blowing His transcendental flute:

veṇuṁ kvaṇantam aravinda-dalāyatākṣaṁ barhāvataṁsam asitāmbuda-sundarāṅgam kandarpa-koṭi-kamanīya-viśeṣa-śobhaṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

Brahmājī said, “I worship Govinda, the primeval Lord, who plays on His transcendental flute. His eyes are like lotus flowers, He is decorated with peacock plumes, and His bodily color resembles a fresh black cloud, although His bodily features are more beautiful than millions of cupids.” These are the special features of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While herding a multitude of cows of various colors along with white bulls, he played with the cowherd boys while playing his flute. Some time later, he gave up herding calves and while herding a wealth of cows who were the abode of beauty (lakṣmyāḥ niketam)—being white, blue, green, yellow and grey along with white bulls, he played with the cowherd boys.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.30

↗
ప్రయుక్తాన్ భోజరాజేన మాయిన: కామరూపిణ: । లీలయా వ్యనుదత్తాంస్తాన్ బాల: క్రీడనకానివ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
prayuktān bhoja-rājena
[prayuktaan bhoja-raajena]
māyinaḥ kāma-rūpiṇaḥ
[maayinah kaama-roopinah]
līlayā vyanudat tāṁs tān
[leelayaa vyanudat taams taan]
bālaḥ krīḍanakān iva
[baalah kreedanakaan iva]
prayuktān — engaged bhoja-rājena — by King Kaṁsa māyinaḥ — great wizards kāma-rūpiṇaḥ — who could assume any form they liked līlayā — in the course of the pastimes vyanudat — killed tān — them tān — as they came there bālaḥ — the child krīḍanakān — dolls iva — like that.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prayuktān bhoja-rājena
prayuktān
engaged
bhoja-rājena
by King Kaṁsa
māyinaḥ kāma-rūpiṇaḥ
māyinaḥ
great wizards
kāma-rūpiṇaḥ
who could assume any form they liked
līlayā vyanudat tāṁs tān
līlayā
in the course of the pastimes
vyanudat
killed
tān
them
tān
as they came there
bālaḥ krīḍanakān iva
bālaḥ
the child
krīḍanakān
dolls
iva
like that.
The great wizards who were able to assume any form were engaged by the King of Bhoja, Kaṁsa, to kill Kṛṣṇa, but in the course of His pastimes the Lord killed them as easily as a child breaks dolls.

The atheist Kaṁsa wanted to kill Kṛṣṇa just after His birth. He failed to do so, but later on he got information that Kṛṣṇa was living in Vṛndāvana at the house of Nanda Mahārāja. He therefore engaged many wizards who could perform wonderful acts and assume any form they liked. All of them appeared before the child-Lord in various forms, like Agha, Baka, Pūtanā, Śakaṭa, Tṛṇāvarta, Dhenuka and Gardabha, and they tried to kill the Lord at every opportunity. But one after another, all of them were killed by the Lord as if He were only playing with dolls. Children play with toy lions, elephants, boars and many similar dolls, which are broken by the children in the course of their playing with them. Before the Almighty Lord, any powerful living being is just like a toy lion in the hands of a playing child. No one can excel God in any capacity, and therefore no one can be equal to or greater than Him, nor can anyone attain the stage of equality with God by any kind of endeavor. Jṣāna, yoga and bhakti are three recognized processes of spiritual realization. The perfection of such processes can lead one to the desired goal of life in spiritual value, but that does not mean that one can attain a perfection equal to the Lord’s by such endeavors. The Lord is the Lord at every stage. When He was playing just like a child on the lap of His mother Yaśodāmayī or just like a cowherd boy with His transcendental friends, He continued to remain God, without the slightest diminution of His six opulences. Thus He is always unrivaled.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As if they were toys, the young boy casually killed all the demons who produced illusory forms according to their will and who were sent by Kaṁsa. He killed (vyanudat) the demons sent by Kaṁsa as if they were toys, lions made of leaves.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.31

↗
విపన్నాన్ విషపానేన నిగృహ్య భుజగాధిపమ్ । ఉత్థాప్యాపాయయద్గావస్తత్తోయం ప్రకృతిస్థితమ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
vipannān viṣa-pānena
[vipannaan visha-paanena]
nigṛhya bhujagādhipam
[nigrihya bhujagaadhipam]
utthāpyāpāyayad gāvas
[utthaapyaapaayayad gaavas]
tat toyaṁ prakṛti-sthitam
[tat toyam prakriti-sthitam]
vipannān — perplexed in great difficulties viṣa-pānena — by drinking poison nigṛhya — subduing bhujaga-adhipam — the chief of the reptiles utthāpya — after coming out apāyayat — caused to drink gāvaḥ — the cows tat — that toyam — water prakṛti — natural sthitam — situated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vipannān viṣa-pānena
vipannān
perplexed in great difficulties
viṣa-pānena
by drinking poison
nigṛhya bhujagādhipam
nigṛhya
subduing
bhujaga-adhipam
the chief of the reptiles
utthāpyāpāyayad gāvas
utthāpya
after coming out
apāyayat
caused to drink
gāvaḥ
the cows
tat toyaṁ prakṛti-sthitam
tat
that
toyam
water
prakṛti
natural
sthitam
situated.
The inhabitants of Vṛndāvana were perplexed by great difficulties because a certain portion of the Yamunā was poisoned by the chief of the reptiles [Kāliya]. The Lord chastised the snake-king within the water and drove him away, and after coming out of the river, He caused the cows to drink the water and proved that the water was again in its natural state.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Subduing Kāliya, he revived the dead cowherd boys and cows, and made them drink the water which became free of poison. He revived the cowherds and cows who had fainted on drinking the poison water and made them drink the water, which was now free of poison (prakrṭi-sthitam).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.32

↗
అయాజయద్గోసవేన గోపరాజం ద్విజోత్తమై: । విత్తస్య చోరుభారస్య చికీర్షన్ సద్వయ‍యం విభు: ॥ ౩౨ ॥
ayājayad go-savena
[ayaajayad go-savena]
gopa-rājaṁ dvijottamaiḥ
[gopa-raajam dvijottamaih]
vittasya coru-bhārasya
[vittasya choru-bhaarasya]
cikīrṣan sad-vyayaṁ vibhuḥ
[chikeershan sad-vyayam vibhuh]
ayājayat — made to perform go-savena — by worship of the cows gopa-rājam — the king of the cowherds dvija-uttamaiḥ — by the learned brāhmaṇas vittasya — of the wealth ca — also uru-bhārasya — great opulence cikīrṣan — desiring to act sat-vyayam — proper utilization vibhuḥ — the great.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ayājayad go-savena
ayājayat
made to perform
go-savena
by worship of the cows
gopa-rājaṁ dvijottamaiḥ
gopa-rājam
the king of the cowherds
dvija-uttamaiḥ
by the learned brāhmaṇas
vittasya coru-bhārasya
vittasya
of the wealth
ca
also
uru-bhārasya
great opulence
cikīrṣan sad-vyayaṁ vibhuḥ
cikīrṣan
desiring to act
sat-vyayam
proper utilization
vibhuḥ
the great.
The Supreme Lord, Kṛṣṇa, desired to utilize the opulent financial strength of Mahārāja Nanda for worship of the cows, and also He wanted to give a lesson to Indra, the King of heaven. Thus He advised His father to perform worship of go, or the pasturing land and the cows, with the help of learned brāhmaṇas.

Since He is the teacher of everyone, the Lord also taught His father, Nanda Mahārāja. Nanda Mahārāja was a well-to-do landholder and owner of many cows, and, as was the custom, he used to perform yearly worship of Indra, the King of heaven, with great opulence. This worship of demigods by the general populace is also advised in the Vedic literature just so people can accept the superior power of the Lord. The demigods are servants of the Lord deputed to look after the management of various activities of universal affairs. Therefore it is advised in the Vedic scriptures that one should perform yajṣas to appease the demigods. But one who is devoted to the Supreme Lord has no need to appease the demigods. Worship of the demigods by common people is an arrangement for acknowledging the supremacy of the Supreme Lord, but it is not necessary. Such appeasement is generally recommended for material gains only. As we have already discussed in the Second Canto of this literature, one who admits the supremacy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead does not need to worship the secondary demigods. Sometimes, being worshiped and adored by less intelligent living beings, the demigods become puffed up with power and forget the supremacy of the Lord. This happened when Lord Kṛṣṇa was present in the universe, and thus the Lord wanted to give a lesson to the King of heaven, Indra. He therefore asked Mahārāja Nanda to stop the sacrifice offered to Indra and to use the money properly by performing a ceremony worshiping the cows and the pasturing ground on the hill of Govardhana. By this act Lord Kṛṣṇa taught human society, as He has instructed in the Bhagavad-gītā also, that one should worship the Supreme Lord by all acts and by all their results. That will bring about the desired success. The vaiśyas are specifically advised to give protection to the cows and their pasturing ground or agricultural land instead of squandering their hard-earned money. That will satisfy the Lord. The perfection of one’s occupational duty, whether in the sphere of duty to oneself, one’s community or one’s nation, is judged by the degree to which the Lord is satisfied.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord had Nanda perform sacrifice by worshipping the cows using brāhmaṇas, desiring to make proper use of abundant wealth. Go-savena means worship of the cows in place of sacrifice to Indra. The word ca indicates that not only did Kṛṣṇa desire to use the accumulated (uru-bhārasya) wealth properly, but he desired also to break the pride of Indra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.33

↗
వర్షతీన్ద్రే వ్రజ: కోపాద్భగ్నమానేఽతివిహ్వల: । గోత్రలీలాతపత్రేణ త్రాతో భద్రానుగృహ్ణతా ॥ ౩౩ ॥
varṣatīndre vrajaḥ kopād
[varshateendre vrajah kopaad]
bhagnamāne ’tivihvalaḥ
[bhagnamaane ’tivihvalah]
gotra-līlātapatreṇa
[gotra-leelaatapatrena]
trāto bhadrānugṛhṇatā
[traato bhadraanugrihnataa]
varṣati — in pouring water indre — by the King of heaven, Indra vrajaḥ — the land of cows (Vṛndāvana) kopāt bhagnamāne — having been in anger on being insulted ati — highly vihvalaḥ — perturbed gotra — the hill for the cows līlā-ātapatreṇa — by the pastime umbrella trātaḥ — were protected bhadra — O sober one anugṛhṇatā — by the merciful Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
varṣatīndre vrajaḥ kopād
varṣati
in pouring water
indre
by the King of heaven, Indra
vrajaḥ
the land of cows (Vṛndāvana)
kopāt bhagnamāne
having been in anger on being insulted
bhagnamāne ’tivihvalaḥ
gotra-līlātapatreṇa
ati
highly
vihvalaḥ
perturbed
gotra
the hill for the cows
līlā-ātapatreṇa
by the pastime umbrella
trātaḥ
were protected
trāto bhadrānugṛhṇatā
bhadra
O sober one
anugṛhṇatā
by the merciful Lord.
O sober Vidura, King Indra, his honor having been insulted, poured water incessantly on Vṛndāvana, and thus the inhabitants of Vraja, the land of cows, were greatly distressed. But the compassionate Lord Kṛṣṇa saved them from danger with His pastime umbrella, the Govardhana Hill.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! When Indra, deprived of sacrifice, angrily showered rain, the inhabitants of Vraja were saved by merciful Kṛṣṇa, who used a mountain as an umbrella to protect them. O Vidura (bhadra)! When Indra, being deprived of sacrifice, in anger began to pour rain (varṣati indre) Kṛṣṇa saved the people of Vraja by playfully using a mountain (gotra) as a large umbrella (ātapatra).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.2.34

↗
శరచ్ఛశికరైర్మృష్టం మానయన్ రజనీముఖమ్ । గాయన్ కలపదం రేమే స్త్రీణాం మణ్డలమణ్డన: ॥ ౩౪ ॥
śarac-chaśi-karair mṛṣṭaṁ
[sharach-chashi-karair mrishtam]
mānayan rajanī-mukham
[maanayan rajanee-mukham]
gāyan kala-padaṁ reme
[gaayan kala-padam reme]
strīṇāṁ maṇḍala-maṇḍanaḥ
[streenaam mandala-mandanah]
śarat — autumn śaśi — of the moon karaiḥ — by the shining mṛṣṭam — brightened mānayan — thinking so rajanī-mukham — the face of the night gāyan — singing kala-padam — pleasing songs reme — enjoyed strīṇām — of the women maṇḍala-maṇḍanaḥ — as the central beauty of the assembly of women.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śarac-chaśi-karair mṛṣṭaṁ
śarat
autumn
śaśi
of the moon
karaiḥ
by the shining
mṛṣṭam
brightened
mānayan rajanī-mukham
mānayan
thinking so
rajanī-mukham
the face of the night
gāyan kala-padaṁ reme
gāyan
singing
kala-padam
pleasing songs
reme
enjoyed
strīṇāṁ maṇḍala-maṇḍanaḥ
strīṇām
of the women
maṇḍala-maṇḍanaḥ
as the central beauty of the assembly of women.
In the third season of the year, the Lord enjoyed as the central beauty of the assembly of women by attracting them with His pleasing songs in an autumn night brightened by moonshine.

Before leaving the land of cows, Vṛndāvana, the Lord pleased His young girlfriends, the transcendental gopīs, in His rāsa-līlā pastimes. Here Uddhava stopped his description of the Lord’s activities.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Third Canto, Second Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Remembrance of Lord Kṛṣṇa.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Respecting the evening bright with the rays of the full moon, singing soft melodies, ornamenting the group of women, Kṛṣṇa enjoyed the rāsa-līlā. Brining joy to the face of Rādhā by rubbing away her perspiration with his hand, making her think that she alone was his lover, Kṛṣṇa, beautiful as the full moon, singing softly, ornamenting the whole group of gopīs, enjoyed rāsa-līlā with them. Rajanī-mukham means evening. Thus one meaning is “considering the suitability of the evening lit by the rays of the autumn moon.” However it has another meaning: he make joyful (mānayan) the face of his independent lover (rajanī-mukham) known svādhina-bhartṛkā, which was made bright by removing her perspiration, using hands of the male lover, like the full moon (śarac-chasi-karaiḥ). She became joyful, thinking “I alone am with Kṛṣṇa.” Ornamenting the whole group of women (with his presence) during enjoyment of the rāsa-līlā (maṇdala-maṇḍanaḥ) he enjoyed that pastime. Thus ends the commentary on Second Chapter of the Third Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Three Uddhava Remembers Kṛṣṇa in Mathurā and Dvārakā
📝 My note