FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

3.1 · Questions by Vidura

45 verses
S Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (13132 chars)

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Great devotees only desire to hear, narrate and remember the stories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus, when the two great devotees, Vidura and Uddhava, met, they naturally began discussing stories of Krishna, remembering their beloved Lord and His extraordinary pastimes inside and outside of Vrindavana.

Previous S.A.V.E.S Next Vidura’s Pilgrimage Last updated 1 year ago

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4)

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Great devotees only desire to hear, narrate and remember the stories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus, when the two great devotees, Vidura and Uddhava, met, they naturally began discussing stories of Krishna, remembering their beloved Lord and His extraordinary pastimes inside and outside of Vrindavana.

Previous S.A.V.E.S Next Vidura’s Pilgrimage Last updated 1 year ago

Stories in Vrindavana

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Stories in Vrindavana Chapter 2 Being thus questioned, Uddhava’s feelings of separation were aroused as he remembered his beloved Lord Krishna whom he had served throughout his life. Now Krishna had left the planet, extreme misfortune would overcome the world. Instead of dwelling on His disappearance, however, Uddhava related the sweet story of Krishna’s appearance, His playful antics in the land of Vrindavana and the celebrated lifting of Govardhana hill.

Previous Vidura’s Pilgrimage Next Stories Outside of Vrindavana Last updated 1 year ago

Stories Outside of Vrindavana

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Stories Outside of Vrindavana Chapter 3 Uddhava then relished the stories of Krishna’s years in Mathura: the dramatic killing of Kamsa, gurukula pastimes in Sandipani Muni’s asrama , the kidnapping of Rukmini, stealing the parijata tree and confronting Indra, the killing of Narakasura and subsequent marriage to the princesses, and the violent massacre at Kuruksetra. After establishing Maharaja Yuddhistira as the king of the earth, Krishna resided in Dwaraka with His 16,108 queens.

Previous Stories in Vrindavana Next Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Last updated 1 year ago

Story of Krishna’s Disappearance

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Chapter 3, 4 Once, the children of the Yadu dynasty took their mockery too far, and when they angered the sages they were cursed to face destruction. A few months later, at Prabhasa-ksetra, the family members accepted the remnants of a sacrifice, which included liquor. Consequently, they all became intoxicated, lost their clarity of consciousness and spoke harshly to each other. Their arguments escalated and the Yadus eventually destroyed each other. Having removed His dynasty, Krishna now prepared His own departure. He instructed Uddhava to go to Badarikasrama and avoid the mayhem that would take place once He left the planet. Uddhava, however, remained with Krishna due to his attachment. At that time, Maitreya arrived, and the Lord spoke to them both. Having requested instructions from the Lord, Uddhava was enlightened with transcendental, timeless wisdom. When Vidura enquired about the details of that discourse, Uddhava directed him to approach Maitreya Muni, who had heard that same wisdom, was older in age and was also residing nearby. Sukadeva Goswami philosophically clarified how it was the supreme desire of Krishna to leave the planet. The Lord had completed His mission and was confident that Uddhava could disseminate knowledge of Him to the world, especially the sages at Badarikasrama who Krishna could not meet personally. Thus, His earthly pastimes came to their natural conclusion. After some days, Vidura reached the Ganges, where he met Maitreya Muni.

Previous Stories Outside of Vrindavana Next Story Time Last updated 1 year ago

Story Time

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time “As one cultivates a seed by pouring water to fructify it, the seed of devotional service sown in the heart of the devotee may be cultured by pouring water in the form of hearing and chanting of the holy name and pastimes of the Lord. The creeper of devotional service, so nourished, gradually grows, and the devotee, acting as a gardener, goes on pouring the water of constant hearing and chanting. The creeper of devotional service gradually grows so high that it passes through the entire material universe and enters into the spiritual sky, growing still higher and higher until it reaches the planet Goloka Vrindavana. The devotee-gardener is in touch with the abode of the Lord even from the material plane by dint of performing devotional service to the Lord simply by hearing and chanting.” ( SB 3.2.6 ) In early years, we excitedly hear fairytales and fables. Later in life, we peruse biographies and blogs. In mature years, we share wisdom with the world by recounting events and experiences. It’s clear that storytelling is a universal feature of every country, culture and community in the world. The sages of bygone ages, fully in tune with human psychology, communicated the most profound truths of life through the medium of stories. Vyasadeva, the compiler of Vedic literature, specifically wrote the Puranas in the format of historical stories. Srila Prabhupada, an expert storyteller himself, once wrote to a disciple – “The Vedic literatures are full of instructive stories for the spiritual advancement of the human society. If I get good assistance, I can overflood your country with stories so nice and instructive.” ( Letter, 22nd July 1967 )

Previous Story of Krishna’s Disappearance Next Why are stories so powerful? Last updated 1 year ago

The Good Listener

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time The Good Listener Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura trained his followers in the art of good listening. He insisted that devotees regularly hear topics of the Lord ( hari-katha ), and once remarked: “I have had the opportunity to hear and discuss these topics since the beginning of my life. I have been discussing these points for fifty years now, in great detail and at every moment throughout the twenty-four hours, when awake and even when slumbering. While continuously discussing these topics, eventually my body will wear out and fall down. I will glorify until the last moment of my life all that I have learned from my gurus. Why only one mouth? Let me have unlimited mouths and an unlimited lifespan to unlimitedly glorify the unlimited qualities of Krishna’s devotees.” Srila Bhaktisiddhanta often quoted: “I do not consider bad a day covered with clouds, but one devoid of discussing the nectar of krishna-katha.” The Srimad-Bhagavatam affirms that the Supreme Lord “cleanses desire for material enjoyment from the heart of the devotee who has developed the urge to hear His messages, which are in themselves virtuous when properly heard and chanted.” When a speaker carries great potency and realisation, and the listener is serious and receptive, an incredible transmission of transcendental knowledge can transpire. Uddhava was indeed a potent speaker. Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura explains that when Uddhava began speaking, his face was washed by tears due to the stimulation of love (prema) that was awakened at the very thought of Krishna’s pastimes. His heartfelt feelings for the subject matter caused him to faint and lose external consciousness. As a great and pure devotee of the Lord, Vidura was also a first-class hearer. He eagerly enquired about Krishna and His devotees, feeling a deep connection with every one of them. Through four powerful examples, the Srimad-Bhagavatam Mahatmyam describes four qualities of a superior listener: Chataka Bird – this bird is famous for taking water directly from the raincloud, avoiding any secondary source. Similarly, the superior listener hears pure subject matters from authentic sources, carefully avoiding unnecessary talks or distractions. There is a perennial risk of additions to, subtractions from and distortions of transcendental subject matter, and the superior listener is wary of this. Hearing intently from a defective source invites confusion and deviation. Swan – the swan can ingeniously extract milk from a mixture of milk and water. Similarly, the superior listener can draw out the essence of spiritual topics, remaining undiverted by peripheral details, distracting side points or personal preferences. Often, we don’t see things as they are, rather we see things as we are. Under the guidance of saintly teachers, one can draw out the essential principles of scriptures and learn the ways and means to apply them in daily life. Parrot – the parrot is famed for its ability to repeat whatever it learns from its master. In the same way, superior listeners have grasped the subject matter so well that they can communicate it to others in a clear, relevant and inspiring way. Furthermore, the beak of the parrot makes whatever it touches sweeter, and the superior listener also enlivens the transmission of knowledge by asking thoughtful questions which allow everyone to dive deeper into the subject matter. Fish – a fish has the unique ability to sit in an ocean of condensed milk and quietly drink, without any blinking whatsoever. The superior listener similarly gives his undivided attention to the speaker, quietly, attentively and enthusiastically absorbing the transcendental knowledge without distraction. Much of this is credited to the humility and desire that the listener possesses. When one feels desperate and helpless, their heart is eager for transcendental instruction. Some people learn through hearing, others by seeing, and those who don’t, have to learn through experiencing. If we’re unable to hear Krishna’s sweet voice of guidance, He may have to shout a little louder for the message to get through. By hearing transcendental topics ( sravanam ), contemplating them deeply ( mananam ) and finding ways to apply them in our life ( nidhidhyasanam ), we embrace a path of transformation which is quicker, easier and safer. Vaisnavas often add the fourth element of prayer ( vandanam ) to invoke the divine blessings in this noble endeavour.

Previous Why are stories so powerful? Next A - Assembly and Activation (5-12) Last updated 1 year ago

Why are stories so powerful?

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Story Time Why are stories so powerful? Applicable – stories offer greater context and understanding because they personalise a message and make us feel a part of the situation. They offer opportunities to extract life lessons and demonstrate how wisdom plays out in a practical way. Personal – stories are relatable to our own experiences, and thus they become more meaningful. We identify with the heroes and the villains because we all have those tendencies inside of us. Stories allow us to understand ourselves better because the actions of the characters stir something inside each one of us. Emotional – stories have the unique ability of arousing our emotions. They can cause us to laugh, cry, cringe or reflect and thus engage with the message on a level deeper than just the intellect. Stories communicate passions, sadness, hardships and joys. They engrave meaning and purpose into our consciousness, as well as offering inspiration and hope. Digestible – stories make complex topics easy, inconspicuously entering a deeper place within our consciousness. Not only that, but they implant a message even within an unwilling person, since they circumvent one’s ego and pride. Stories don’t tell us something – they show us something. Memorable –research shows that stories are remembered twenty times more than facts alone. We live in times of mass distraction and people’s attention spans have been obliterated. Thus, stories help to communicate things in an effective and efficient way.

Previous Story Time Next The Good Listener Last updated 1 year ago

Vidura’s Pilgrimage

S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Vidura’s Pilgrimage Chapter 1 The questions of Saunaka mirrored the questions of Maharaja Pariksit. Thus, Suta Goswami narrated the answers of Sukadeva Goswami. Before he narrated the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya, Sukadeva Goswami explained how Vidura left the palace in Hastinapura and first met Uddhava. When the Pandavas were repeatedly cheated and harassed by the Kauravas, Vidura advised Dhritarastra to return their legitimate share of the kingdom. The blind King and his defiant son, however, categorically refused to entertain that idea. After being sharply insulted by Duryodhana, Vidura concluded it was the apt time to leave Hastinapura and embark on pilgrimage. While visiting numerous holy sites, Vidura heard the happy news that the Pandavas had emerged victorious in the fratricidal war and had now rightfully regained the kingdom. When Vidura reached the Yamuna, he met the great devotee Uddhava, who was Krishna’s cousin and constant companion. Vidura eagerly enquired about Krishna, His various family members, and His dear devotees like the Pandavas.

Previous S - Stories of the Supreme (1-4) Next Stories in Vrindavana Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ ఏవమేతత్పురా పృష్టో మైత్రేయో భగవాన్ కిల । క్షత్‍త్రా వనం ప్రవిష్టేన త్యక్త్వా స్వగృహమృద్ధిమత్ ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
evam etat purā pṛṣṭo
[evam etat puraa prishto]
maitreyo bhagavān kila
[maitreyo bhagavaan kila]
kṣattrā vanaṁ praviṣṭena
[kshattraa vanam pravishtena]
tyaktvā sva-gṛham ṛddhimat
[tyaktvaa sva-griham riddhimat]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said evam — thus etat — this purā — formerly pṛṣṭaḥ — being asked maitreyaḥ — the great sage Maitreya bhagavān — His Grace kila — certainly kṣattrā — by Vidura vanam — forest praviṣṭena — entering tyaktvā — renouncing sva-gṛham — own house ṛddhimat — prosperous.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
evam etat purā pṛṣṭo
evam
thus
etat
this
purā
formerly
pṛṣṭaḥ
being asked
maitreyo bhagavān kila
maitreyaḥ
the great sage Maitreya
bhagavān
His Grace
kila
certainly
kṣattrā vanaṁ praviṣṭena
kṣattrā
by Vidura
vanam
forest
praviṣṭena
entering
tyaktvā sva-gṛham ṛddhimat
tyaktvā
renouncing
sva-gṛham
own house
ṛddhimat
prosperous.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: After renouncing his prosperous home and entering the forest, King Vidura, the great devotee, asked this question of His Grace Maitreya Ṛṣi.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: Previously Vidura, after giving up his prosperous house for entering the forest, asked this question to the powerful Maitreya. Offering respects to guru and Kṛṣṇa, the ocean of mercy, I take shelter of Śukadeva, master of the world, eye of the universe. I offer myself and everything I possess to he who is the life of the gopīs, the controller, for service to his dear devotees. In the thirty-three chapters of the Third Canto, sarga, the creation of the totality of matter with elements manifesting from prakṛti by the glance of Viṣṇu, is described. [Note: From the Third to Twelfth Canto, Viśvanātha identifies each Canto with one of the ten topics of Bhāgavatam.] Having already shown that the Bhāgavatam was first revealed by the Lord to Brahmā and Nārada, it is again revealed by Śeṣa to the Kumāras. [Note: This is explained in SB 3.8.4.] The conversation between Vidura and Uddhava continues for four chapters. Eight chapters deal with sarga and visarga. Seven chapters describe the pastimes of Varāha. One chapter describes the visarga in summary and four chapters describe Kapila. Nine chapters describe his teachings. This completes the Third Canto. In the First Chapter, giving up his elder brother, Vidura departs and goes on pilgrimage. There he meets Uddhava and asks questions, though he was unsteady in hearing because of separation from the Lord. Uddhava answers two or three of the questions asked by Parīkṣit in the eighth chapter of the Second Canto. Śukadeva, considering that the questions of Parīkṣit were previously asked by Vidura to Maitreya, decided to answer Parīkṣit’s questions by first describing the introduction which gave rise to their conversation. Ṛddhimat means full of all wealth.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.2

↗
యద్వా అయం మన్త్రకృద్వో భగవానఖిలేశ్వర: । పౌరవేన్ద్రగృహం హిత్వా ప్రవివేశాత్మసాత్కృతమ్ ॥ ౨ ॥
yad vā ayaṁ mantra-kṛd vo
[yad vaa ayam mantra-krid vo]
bhagavān akhileśvaraḥ
[bhagavaan akhileshvarah]
pauravendra-gṛhaṁ hitvā
[pauravendra-griham hitvaa]
praviveśātmasāt kṛtam
[praviveshaatmasaat kritam]
yat — the house vai — what else is there to say ayam — Śrī Kṛṣṇa mantra-kṛt — minister vaḥ — you people bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead akhila-īśvaraḥ — the Lord of everything pauravendra — Duryodhana gṛham — house hitvā — giving up praviveśa — entered ātmasāt — identify with oneself kṛtam — so accepted.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad vā ayaṁ mantra-kṛd vo
yat
the house
vai
what else is there to say
ayam
Śrī Kṛṣṇa
mantra-kṛt
minister
bhagavān akhileśvaraḥ
vaḥ
you people
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
akhila-īśvaraḥ
the Lord of everything
pauravendra-gṛhaṁ hitvā
pauravendra
Duryodhana
gṛham
house
hitvā
giving up
praviveśātmasāt kṛtam
praviveśa
entered
ātmasāt
identify with oneself
kṛtam
so accepted.
What else is there to say about the residential house of the Pāṇḍavas? Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Lord of everything, acted as your minister. He used to enter that house as if it were His own, and He did not take any care of Duryodhana’s house.

According to the Gauḍīya acintya-bhedābheda-tattva philosophy, anything which satisfies the senses of the Supreme Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is also Śrī Kṛṣṇa. For example, Śrī Vṛndāvana-dhāma is nondifferent from Śrī Kṛṣṇa ( tad-dhāma vṛndāvanam ) because at Vṛndāvana the Lord enjoys the transcendental bliss of His internal potency. Similarly, the house of the Pāṇḍavas was also the source of transcendental bliss for the Lord. It is mentioned here that the Lord identified the house with His own Self. Thus the house of the Pāṇḍavas was as good as Vṛndāvana, and Vidura should not have given up that place of transcendental bliss. Therefore the reason for his quitting the house was not exactly family misunderstanding; rather, Vidura took the opportunity to meet Ṛṣi Maitreya and discuss transcendental knowledge. For a saintly person like Vidura, any disturbance due to worldly affairs is insignificant. Such disturbances, however, are sometimes favorable for higher realization, and therefore Vidura took advantage of a family misunderstanding in order to meet Maitreya Ṛṣi.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Lord who acted as your advisor gave up the house of Duryodhana and entered the house of Vidura, accepting it as his own. Vidura should not have give up his house which was superior to all the pilgrimage places to wtich he went. However he gave it up because of the pain inflicted by his brother, Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Kṛṣṇa, acting as the advisor of you the Pāṇḍavas, thinking of them all the time, rejected Duryodhana’s house, and entered Vidura’s house, even though not invited, since he accepted it as his own house (ātmasāt).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.3

↗
రాజోవాచ కుత్ర క్షత్తుర్భగవతా మైత్రేయేణాస సఙ్గమ: । కదా వా సహ సంవాద ఏతద్వర్ణయ న: ప్రభో ॥ ౩ ॥
rājovāca
[raajovaacha]
kutra kṣattur bhagavatā
[kutra kshattur bhagavataa]
maitreyeṇāsa saṅgamaḥ
[maitreyenaasa sangamah]
kadā vā saha-saṁvāda
[kadaa vaa saha-samvaada]
etad varṇaya naḥ prabho
[etad varnaya nah prabho]
rājā uvāca — the King said kutra — wherein kṣattuḥ — with Vidura bhagavatā — and with His Grace maitreyeṇa — with Maitreya āsa — there was saṅgamaḥ — meeting kadā — when vā — also saha — with saṁvādaḥ — discussion etat — this varṇaya — describe naḥ — unto me prabho — O my lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājovāca
rājā uvāca
the King said
kutra kṣattur bhagavatā
kutra
wherein
kṣattuḥ
with Vidura
bhagavatā
and with His Grace
maitreyeṇāsa saṅgamaḥ
maitreyeṇa
with Maitreya
āsa
there was
saṅgamaḥ
meeting
kadā vā saha-saṁvāda
kadā
when
vā
also
saha
with
saṁvādaḥ
discussion
etad varṇaya naḥ prabho
etat
this
varṇaya
describe
naḥ
unto me
prabho
O my lord.
The King asked Śukadeva Gosvāmī: Where and when did the meeting and discussion take place between Saint Vidura and His Grace Maitreya Muni? Kindly oblige, my lord, and describe this to us.

Exactly as Śaunaka Ṛṣi inquired of Sūta Gosvāmī and Sūta Gosvāmī replied, so Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī replied to King Parīkṣit’s inquiries. The King was very anxious to understand the meaningful discussion that took place between the two great souls.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The King said: O master! Where did Vidura meet the powerful Maitreya? When did they speak with each other? Please describe this to me. Āsa stands for babhūva (took place).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.4

↗
న హ్యల్పార్థోదయస్తస్య విదురస్యామలాత్మన: । తస్మిన్ వరీయసి ప్రశ్న: సాధువాదోపబృంహిత: ॥ ౪ ॥
na hy alpārthodayas tasya
[na hy alpaarthodayas tasya]
vidurasyāmalātmanaḥ
[vidurasyaamalaatmanah]
tasmin varīyasi praśnaḥ
[tasmin vareeyasi prashnah]
sādhu-vādopabṛṁhitaḥ
[saadhu-vaadopabrimhitah]
na — never hi — certainly alpa-artha — small (unimportant) purpose udayaḥ — raised tasya — his vidurasya — of Vidura amala-ātmanaḥ — of the saintly man tasmin — in that varīyasi — highly purposeful praśnaḥ — question sādhu-vāda — things approved by saints and sages upabṛṁhitaḥ — full with.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na hy alpārthodayas tasya
na
never
vidurasyāmalātmanaḥ
tasmin varīyasi praśnaḥ
sādhu-vādopabṛṁhitaḥ
hi
certainly
alpa-artha
small (unimportant) purpose
udayaḥ
raised
tasya
his
vidurasya
of Vidura
amala-ātmanaḥ
of the saintly man
tasmin
in that
varīyasi
highly purposeful
praśnaḥ
question
sādhu-vāda
things approved by saints and sages
upabṛṁhitaḥ
full with.
Saint Vidura was a great and pure devotee of the Lord, and therefore his questions to His Grace Ṛṣi Maitreya must have been very purposeful, on the highest level, and approved by learned circles.

Questions and answers among different classes of men have different value. Inquiries by mercantile men in a business exchange cannot be expected to be highly purposeful in spiritual values. Questions and answers by different classes of men can be guessed by the caliber of the persons concerned. In Bhagavad-gītā, the discussion was between Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Supreme Person and the supreme devotee respectively. The Lord admitted Arjuna to be His devotee and friend ( Bg. 4.3 ), and therefore any sane man can guess that the discussion was on the topic of the bhakti-yoga system. Actually the whole Bhagavad-gītā is based on the principle of bhakti-yoga. There is a difference between karma and karma-yoga. Karma is regulated action for the enjoyment of the fruit by the performer, but karma-yoga is action performed by the devotee for the satisfaction of the Lord. Karma-yoga is based on bhakti, or pleasing the Lord, whereas karma is based on pleasing the senses of the performer himself. According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, one is advised to approach a bona fide spiritual master when one is actually inclined to question from an elevated level of spiritual understanding. A common man who has no interest in spiritual values has no need to approach a spiritual master just as a matter of following fashion.

As a student, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was serious about learning the science of God, and Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a bona fide spiritual master in the transcendental science. Both of them knew that the topics discussed by Vidura and Ṛṣi Maitreya were elevated, and thus Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very interested in learning from the bona fide spiritual master.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The questions which the pure soul Vidura asked to the excellent Maitreya were not insignificant, and were nourished by the pleasure of the devotees. Varīyasi means best. Because the questions of Vidura to Maitreya were not insignificant, they are nourished by the pleasure of the devotees (sādhu-vāda), or they were praised by the statements of Maitreya.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.5

↗
సూత ఉవాచ స ఏవమృషివర్యోఽయం పృష్టో రాజ్ఞా పరీక్షితా । ప్రత్యాహ తం సుబహువిత్ప్రీతాత్మా శ్రూయతామితి ॥ ౫ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
sa evam ṛṣi-varyo ’yaṁ
[sa evam rishi-varyo ’yam]
pṛṣṭo rājṣā parīkṣitā
[prishto raajshaa pareekshitaa]
pratyāha taṁ subahu-vit
[pratyaaha tam subahu-vit]
prītātmā śrūyatām iti
[preetaatmaa shrooyataam iti]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said saḥ — he evam — thus ṛṣi-varyaḥ — the great ṛṣi ayam — Śukadeva Gosvāmī pṛṣṭaḥ — being questioned rājṣā — by the King parīkṣitā — Mahārāja Parīkṣit pratyāha — he replied tam — unto the King su-bahu-vit — highly experienced prīta-ātmā — fully satisfied śrūyatām — please hear me iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
sa evam ṛṣi-varyo ’yaṁ
saḥ
he
evam
thus
ṛṣi-varyaḥ
the great ṛṣi
ayam
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
pṛṣṭo rājṣā parīkṣitā
pṛṣṭaḥ
being questioned
rājṣā
by the King
parīkṣitā
Mahārāja Parīkṣit
pratyāha taṁ subahu-vit
pratyāha
he replied
tam
unto the King
su-bahu-vit
highly experienced
prītātmā śrūyatām iti
prīta-ātmā
fully satisfied
śrūyatām
please hear me
iti
thus.
Śrī Suta Gosvāmī said: The great sage Śukadeva Gosvāmī was highly experienced and was pleased with the King. Thus being questioned by the King, he said to him, “Please hear the topics attentively.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Omniscient Śukadeva, the best of sages, on being requested by King Parīkṣit, with great affection then said him, “Please listen.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.6

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ యదా తు రాజా స్వసుతానసాధూన్ పుష్ణన్నధర్మేణ వినష్టద‍ృష్టి: । భ్రాతుర్యవిష్ఠస్య సుతాన్ విబన్ధూన్ ప్రవేశ్య లాక్షాభవనే దదాహ ॥ ౬ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
yadā tu rājā sva-sutān asādhūn
[yadaa tu raajaa sva-sutaan asaadhoon]
puṣṇan na dharmeṇa vinaṣṭa-dṛṣṭiḥ
[pushnan na dharmena vinashta-drishtih]
bhrātur yaviṣṭhasya sutān vibandhūn
[bhraatur yavishthasya sutaan vibandhoon]
praveśya lākṣā-bhavane dadāha
[praveshya laakshaa-bhavane dadaaha]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said yadā — when tu — but rājā — King Dhṛtarāṣṭra sva-sutān — his own sons asādhūn — dishonest puṣṇan — nourishing na — never dharmeṇa — on the right path vinaṣṭa-dṛṣṭiḥ — one who has lost his insight bhrātuḥ — of his brother yaviṣṭhasya — younger sutān — sons vibandhūn — having no guardian (father) praveśya — made to enter lākṣā — lacquer bhavane — in the house dadāha — set on fire.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
yadā tu rājā sva-sutān asādhūn
yadā
when
tu
but
rājā
King Dhṛtarāṣṭra
sva-sutān
his own sons
asādhūn
dishonest
puṣṇan na dharmeṇa vinaṣṭa-dṛṣṭiḥ
puṣṇan
nourishing
na
never
dharmeṇa
on the right path
vinaṣṭa-dṛṣṭiḥ
one who has lost his insight
bhrātur yaviṣṭhasya sutān vibandhūn
bhrātuḥ
of his brother
yaviṣṭhasya
younger
sutān
sons
vibandhūn
having no guardian (father)
praveśya lākṣā-bhavane dadāha
praveśya
made to enter
lākṣā
lacquer
bhavane
in the house
dadāha
set on fire.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: King Dhṛtarāṣṭra became blind under the influence of impious desires to nourish his dishonest sons, and thus he set fire to the lacquer house to burn his fatherless nephews, the Pāṇḍavas.

Dhṛtarāṣṭra was blind from birth, but his blindness in committing impious activities to support his dishonest sons was a greater blindness than his physical lack of eyesight. The physical lack of sight does not bar one from spiritual progress. But when one is blind spiritually, even though physically fit, that blindness is dangerously detrimental to the progressive path of human life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: Dhṛtarāṣtra, blind to knowledge, supporting his own evil sons illegally, made the fatherless sons of Pāṇḍu, his younger brother, live in a lac house and burned them. The sentence ends in verse 16 with the statement Vidura left (kṣattā ayāt). Vinaṣṭa-dṛtiḥ here indicates that Dhṛtarāṣṭra had no knowledge. His younger brother was Pāṇḍu. Vibandhūn means “without a father.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.7

↗
యదా సభాయాం కురుదేవదేవ్యా: కేశాభిమర్శం సుతకర్మ గర్హ్యమ్ । న వారయామాస నృప: స్‍నుషాయా: స్వాస్రైర్హరన్త్యా: కుచకుఙ్కుమాని ॥ ౭ ॥
yadā sabhāyāṁ kuru-deva-devyāḥ
[yadaa sabhaayaam kuru-deva-devyaah]
keśābhimarśaṁ suta-karma garhyam
[keshaabhimarsham suta-karma garhyam]
na vārayām āsa nṛpaḥ snuṣāyāḥ
[na vaarayaam aasa nripah snushaayaah]
svāsrair harantyāḥ kuca-kuṅkumāni
[svaasrair harantyaah kucha-kunkumaani]
yadā — when sabhāyām — the assembly kuru-deva-devyāḥ — of Draupadī, the wife of godly Yudhiṣṭhira keśa-abhimarśam — insult by grabbing her hair suta-karma — action taken by his son garhyam — which was abominable na — did not vārayām āsa — forbid nṛpaḥ — the King snuṣāyāḥ — of his nephew’s wife svāsraiḥ — by her tears harantyāḥ — of she who was washing kuca-kuṅkumāni — red dust on her breast.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā sabhāyāṁ kuru-deva-devyāḥ
yadā
when
sabhāyām
the assembly
kuru-deva-devyāḥ
of Draupadī, the wife of godly Yudhiṣṭhira
keśābhimarśaṁ suta-karma garhyam
keśa-abhimarśam
insult by grabbing her hair
suta-karma
action taken by his son
garhyam
which was abominable
na vārayām āsa nṛpaḥ snuṣāyāḥ
na
did not
vārayām āsa
forbid
nṛpaḥ
the King
snuṣāyāḥ
of his nephew’s wife
svāsrair harantyāḥ kuca-kuṅkumāni
svāsraiḥ
by her tears
harantyāḥ
of she who was washing
kuca-kuṅkumāni
red dust on her breast.
The King did not forbid his son Duḥśāsana’s abominable action of grabbing the hair of Draupadī, the wife of the godly King Yudhiṣṭhira, even though her tears washed the red dust on her breast.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Dhṛtarāṣṭra did not forbid his son’s despicable action of dragging the wife of Yudhiṣṭhira by the hair into the assembly, while Draupadī wept, washing away the kuṁkuṁa on her breasts with tears. Kuru-deva-devyāḥ refers to Draupadī. She washed away the kuṁkuma on her breasts by her tears. Also indicated is that she would wash away the kuṁkuṁa on the breasts of the enemy’s wives, with their tears, when she would have their husbands killed. This is the fourth type of atiśayokti (hyperbole).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.8

↗
ద్యూతే త్వధర్మేణ జితస్య సాధో: సత్యావలమ్బస్య వనం గతస్య । న యాచతోఽదాత్సమయేన దాయం తమోజుషాణో యదజాతశత్రో: ॥ ౮ ॥
dyūte tv adharmeṇa jitasya sādhoḥ
[dyoote tv adharmena jitasya saadhoh]
satyāvalambasya vanaṁ gatasya
[satyaavalambasya vanam gatasya]
na yācato ’dāt samayena dāyaṁ
[na yaachato ’daat samayena daayam]
tamo-juṣāṇo yad ajāta-śatroḥ
[tamo-jushaano yad ajaata-shatroh]
dyūte — by means of gambling tu — but adharmeṇa — by unfair tricks jitasya — of the vanquished sādhoḥ — a saintly person satya-avalambasya — one who embraced truth as shelter vanam — forest gatasya — of the goer na — never yācataḥ — when asked for adāt — delivered samayena — in due course dāyam — right share tamaḥ-juṣāṇaḥ — overwhelmed by illusion yat — as much as ajāta-śatroḥ — of one who had no enemy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dyūte tv adharmeṇa jitasya sādhoḥ
dyūte
by means of gambling
tu
but
adharmeṇa
by unfair tricks
jitasya
of the vanquished
sādhoḥ
a saintly person
satyāvalambasya vanaṁ gatasya
satya-avalambasya
one who embraced truth as shelter
vanam
forest
gatasya
of the goer
na yācato ’dāt samayena dāyaṁ
na
never
yācataḥ
when asked for
adāt
delivered
tamo-juṣāṇo yad ajāta-śatroḥ
samayena
in due course
dāyam
right share
tamaḥ-juṣāṇaḥ
overwhelmed by illusion
yat
as much as
ajāta-śatroḥ
of one who had no enemy.
Yudhiṣṭhira, who was born without any enemy, was unfairly defeated in gambling. But because he had taken the vow of truthfulness, he went off to the forest. When he came back in due course and begged the return of his rightful share of the kingdom, he was refused by Dhṛtarāṣṭra, who was overwhelmed by illusion.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the rightful heir to his father’s kingdom. But just to favor his own sons, headed by Duryodhana, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira’s uncle, adopted various unfair means to cheat his nephews of their rightful share of the kingdom. At last the Pāṇḍavas demanded only five villages, one for each of the five brothers, but that was also refused by the usurpers. This incident led to the War of Kurukṣetra. The Battle of Kurukṣetra, therefore, was induced by the Kurus, and not the Pāṇḍavas.

As kṣatriyas, the proper livelihood of the Pāṇḍavas was only to rule, and not to accept any other occupation. A brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya or vaiśya will not accept employment for his livelihood under any circumstances.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Righteous Yudhiṣṭhira, defeated by unfair means in the gambling match, went to the forest according to his promise, and then returned to claim his rightful claim to the kingdom. But, overcome with illusion, Dhṛtarāṣṭra did not give it back. When (yat) Yudhiṣṭhira returning from the forest, according to the promised time (samayena), asked for his share (dāyam), Dhṛtarāṣṭra refused.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.9

↗
యదా చ పార్థప్రహిత: సభాయాం జగద్గురుర్యాని జగాద కృష్ణ: । న తాని పుంసామమృతాయనాని రాజోరు మేనే క్షతపుణ్యలేశ: ॥ ౯ ॥
yadā ca pārtha-prahitaḥ sabhāyāṁ
[yadaa cha paartha-prahitah sabhaayaam]
jagad-gurur yāni jagāda kṛṣṇaḥ
[jagad-gurur yaani jagaada krishnah]
na tāni puṁsām amṛtāyanāni
[na taani pumsaam amritaayanaani]
rājoru mene kṣata-puṇya-leśaḥ
[raajoru mene kshata-punya-leshah]
yadā — when ca — also pārtha-prahitaḥ — being advised by Arjuna sabhāyām — in the assembly jagat-guruḥ — the teacher of the world yāni — those jagāda — went kṛṣṇaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa na — never tāni — such words puṁsām — of all men of sense amṛta-ayanāni — as good as nectar rājā — the King (Dhṛtarāṣṭra or Duryodhana) uru — very important mene — did consider kṣata — dwindling puṇya-leśaḥ — fragment of pious acts.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā ca pārtha-prahitaḥ sabhāyāṁ
yadā
when
ca
also
pārtha-prahitaḥ
being advised by Arjuna
sabhāyām
in the assembly
jagad-gurur yāni jagāda kṛṣṇaḥ
jagat-guruḥ
the teacher of the world
yāni
those
jagāda
went
kṛṣṇaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
na tāni puṁsām amṛtāyanāni
na
never
tāni
such words
puṁsām
of all men of sense
amṛta-ayanāni
as good as nectar
rājoru mene kṣata-puṇya-leśaḥ
rājā
the King (Dhṛtarāṣṭra or Duryodhana)
uru
very important
mene
did consider
kṣata
dwindling
puṇya-leśaḥ
fragment of pious acts.
Lord Kṛṣṇa was sent by Arjuna into the assembly as the spiritual master of the whole world, and although His words were heard by some [like Bhīṣma] as pure nectar, it was not so for the others, who were completely bereft of the last farthing of past pious works. The King [Dhṛtarāṣṭra or Duryodhana] did not take the words of Lord Kṛṣṇa very seriously.

Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is the spiritual master of the entire universe, accepted the duty of a messenger and, deputed by Arjuna, went to the assembly of King Dhṛtarāṣṭra on a peace mission. Kṛṣṇa is everyone’s Lord, yet because He was the transcendental friend of Arjuna, He gladly accepted the role of messenger, exactly like an ordinary friend. That is the beauty of the Lord’s behavior with His pure devotees. He reached the assembly and spoke about peace, and the message was relished by Bhīṣma and other great leaders because it was spoken by the Lord Himself. But due to the exhaustion of the pious results of their past deeds, Duryodhana, or his father, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, did not take the message very seriously. That is the way of persons who have no credit of pious deeds. By past pious deeds, one may become the king of a country, but because the results of the pious acts of Duryodhana and company were dwindling, it became evident from their actions that they were sure to lose the kingdom to the Pāṇḍavas. The message of Godhead is always like nectar to the devotees, but it is just the opposite to the nondevotees. Sugar candy is always sweet to a healthy man, but it tastes very bitter to persons suffering from jaundice.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Duryodhana, whose piety had been destroyed, did not give respect to the sweet words that Kṛṣṇa, guru of the universe, sent by Yudhiṣṭhira, spoke to the men in the Kuru assembly. Puṁsām refers to Bhīṣma and others who were present in the assembly. Dhṛtarāṣṭra or Duryodhana did not greatly respect those words. The reason is that he had lost all piety. He did not lose the piety for keeping happiness, fame or wealth, but lost the piety to rule the kingdom.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.10

↗
యదోపహూతో భవనం ప్రవిష్టో మన్త్రాయ పృష్ట: కిల పూర్వజేన । అథాహ తన్మన్త్రద‍ృశాం వరీయాన్ యన్మన్త్రిణో వైదురికం వదన్తి ॥ ౧౦ ॥
yadopahūto bhavanaṁ praviṣṭo
[yadopahooto bhavanam pravishto]
mantrāya pṛṣṭaḥ kila pūrvajena
[mantraaya prishtah kila poorvajena]
athāha tan mantra-dṛśāṁ varīyān
[athaaha tan mantra-drishaam vareeyaan]
yan mantriṇo vaidurikaṁ vadanti
[yan mantrino vaidurikam vadanti]
yadā — when upahūtaḥ — was called by bhavanam — the palace praviṣṭaḥ — entered mantrāya — for consultation pṛṣṭaḥ — asked by kila — of course pūrvajena — by the elder brother atha — thus āha — said tat — that mantra — advice dṛśām — just suitable varīyān — excellent yat — that which mantriṇaḥ — the ministers of state, or expert politicians vaidurikam — instructions by Vidura vadanti — do they say.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadopahūto bhavanaṁ praviṣṭo
yadā
when
upahūtaḥ
was called by
bhavanam
the palace
praviṣṭaḥ
entered
mantrāya pṛṣṭaḥ kila pūrvajena
mantrāya
for consultation
pṛṣṭaḥ
asked by
kila
of course
pūrvajena
by the elder brother
athāha tan mantra-dṛśāṁ varīyān
atha
thus
āha
said
tat
that
mantra
advice
dṛśām
just suitable
varīyān
excellent
yan mantriṇo vaidurikaṁ vadanti
yat
that which
mantriṇaḥ
the ministers of state, or expert politicians
vaidurikam
instructions by Vidura
vadanti
do they say.
When Vidura was invited by his elder brother [Dhṛtarāṣṭra] for consultation, he entered the house and gave instructions which were exactly to the point. His advice is well known, and instructions by Vidura are approved by expert ministers of state.

Political suggestions by Vidura are known as expert, just as, in modern times, Paṇḍita Cāṇakya is considered the authority in good counsel in both political and moral instructions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vidura, the supreme adviser, whose wise counsel the wise even today call “advice of Vidura,” called by Dhṛtarāṣṭra for advice, then entered his house and spoke. Vidura’s humiliation by Duryodhana is described in the following six verses. Because Vidura gave wise advice even today good advice is called “words of Vidura.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.11

↗
అజాతశత్రో: ప్రతియచ్ఛ దాయం తితిక్షతో దుర్విషహం తవాగ: । సహానుజో యత్ర వృకోదరాహి: శ్వసన్ రుషా యత్త్వమలం బిభేషి ॥ ౧౧ ॥
ajāta-śatroḥ pratiyaccha dāyaṁ
[ajaata-shatroh pratiyachcha daayam]
titikṣato durviṣahaṁ tavāgaḥ
[titikshato durvishaham tavaagah]
sahānujo yatra vṛkodarāhiḥ
[sahaanujo yatra vrikodaraahih]
śvasan ruṣā yat tvam alaṁ bibheṣi
[shvasan rushaa yat tvam alam bibheshi]
ajāta-śatroḥ — of Yudhiṣṭhira, who has no enemy pratiyaccha — return dāyam — legitimate share titikṣataḥ — of he who is so forbearing durviṣaham — unbearable tava — your āgaḥ — offense saha — along with anujaḥ — younger brothers yatra — wherein vṛkodara — Bhīma ahiḥ — revenging snake śvasan — breathing heavily ruṣā — in anger yat — whom tvam — you alam — verily bibheṣi — do fear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ajāta-śatroḥ pratiyaccha dāyaṁ
ajāta-śatroḥ
of Yudhiṣṭhira, who has no enemy
pratiyaccha
return
dāyam
legitimate share
titikṣato durviṣahaṁ tavāgaḥ
titikṣataḥ
of he who is so forbearing
durviṣaham
unbearable
tava
your
āgaḥ
offense
sahānujo yatra vṛkodarāhiḥ
saha
along with
anujaḥ
younger brothers
yatra
wherein
vṛkodara
Bhīma
ahiḥ
revenging snake
śvasan ruṣā yat tvam alaṁ bibheṣi
śvasan
breathing heavily
ruṣā
in anger
yat
whom
tvam
you
alam
verily
bibheṣi
do fear.
[Vidura said:] You must now return the legitimate share to Yudhiṣṭhira, who has no enemies and who has been forbearing through untold sufferings due to your offenses. He is waiting with his younger brothers, among whom is the revengeful Bhīma, breathing heavily like a snake. Surely you are afraid of him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
“Give the rightful portion of the kingdom to Yudhiṣṭhira, who has tolerated your intolerable aggression-- because of which, Bhīma, along with his brothers, remains breathing heavily in anger at your offenses. This gives you fear. Because of the offenses (yatra) Bhīma breathes heavily in anger, because of which you are in great (alam) fear.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.12

↗
పార్థాంస్తు దేవో భగవాన్ముకున్దో గృహీతవాన్ సక్షితిదేవదేవ: । ఆస్తే స్వపుర్యాం యదుదేవదేవో వినిర్జితాశేషనృదేవదేవ: ॥ ౧౨ ॥
pārthāṁs tu devo bhagavān mukundo
[paarthaams tu devo bhagavaan mukundo]
gṛhītavān sakṣiti-deva-devaḥ
[griheetavaan sakshiti-deva-devah]
āste sva-puryāṁ yadu-deva-devo
[aaste sva-puryaam yadu-deva-devo]
vinirjitāśeṣa-nṛdeva-devaḥ
[vinirjitaashesha-nrideva-devah]
pārthān — the sons of Pṛthā (Kuntī) tu — but devaḥ — the Lord bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead mukundaḥ — Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who awards liberation gṛhītavān — has taken up sa — with kṣiti-deva-devaḥ — the brāhmaṇas and the demigods āste — is present sva-puryām — along with His family yadu-deva-devaḥ — worshiped by the royal order of the Yadu dynasty vinirjita — who have been conquered aśeṣa — unlimited nṛdeva — kings devaḥ — Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pārthāṁs tu devo bhagavān mukundo
pārthān
the sons of Pṛthā (Kuntī)
tu
but
devaḥ
the Lord
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
mukundaḥ
Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who awards liberation
gṛhītavān sakṣiti-deva-devaḥ
gṛhītavān
has taken up
sa
with
kṣiti-deva-devaḥ
the brāhmaṇas and the demigods
āste sva-puryāṁ yadu-deva-devo
āste
is present
sva-puryām
along with His family
yadu-deva-devaḥ
worshiped by the royal order of the Yadu dynasty
vinirjitāśeṣa-nṛdeva-devaḥ
vinirjita
who have been conquered
aśeṣa
unlimited
nṛdeva
kings
devaḥ
Lord.
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, has accepted the sons of Pṛthā as His kinsmen, and all the kings of the world are with Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. He is present in His home with all His family members, the kings and princes of the Yadu dynasty, who have conquered an unlimited number of rulers, and He is their Lord.

Vidura gave Dhṛtarāṣṭra very good counsel regarding political alliance with the sons of Pṛthā, the Pāṇḍavas. The first thing he said was that Lord Kṛṣṇa was intimately related with them as their cousin. Because Lord Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He is worshipable by all brāhmaṇas and demigods, who are the controllers of the universal affairs. Besides that, Lord Kṛṣṇa and His family members, the royal order of the Yadu dynasty, were the conquerors of all kings of the world.

The kṣatriyas used to fight the kings of various dominions and kidnap their beautiful princess-daughters after conquering their relatives. This system was laudable because the kṣatriyas and the princesses would be married only on the basis of the chivalry of the conquering kṣatriya. All the young princes of the Yadu dynasty married the daughters of other kings in this way, by chivalrous force, and thus they were conquerors of all the kings of the world. Vidura wanted to impress upon his elder brother that fighting with the Pāṇḍavas was fraught with many dangers because they were supported by Lord Kṛṣṇa, who had conquered, even in His childhood, demons like Kaṁsa and Jarāsandha and demigods like Brahmā and Indra. Therefore all universal power was behind the Pāṇḍavas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
“The Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa, supported by brāhmaṇas and the devatās, strongest among the best of the Yadus, who has defeated innumerable kings, resides in his own city of Dvārakā and has accepted the Pāṇḍavas as himself. Hear about other aspects of their even greater power that they have accrued now. Kṛṣṇa is worshipable (deva) because he is the Supreme Lord (bhagavān¸ along with whom reside the brāhmaṇas (kṣiti-deva) and the devatās. The brāhmaṇas and devatās are on his side. He resides in his own city of Dvārakā, not in any other place. He is the strength of the best of the Yadus. Where he exists, the Yadus are most powerful. Here about his strength. he has defeated unlimited kings. Starting from his childhood he defeated Kaṁsa, Jarāsandha and even devatās such as Brahmā, Indra, Varuṇa and Śiva. If you desire your own good, then give a share of the kingdom to the Pāṇḍavas.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.13

↗
స ఏష దోష: పురుషద్విడాస్తే గృహాన్ ప్రవిష్టో యమపత్యమత్యా । పుష్ణాసి కృష్ణాద్విముఖో గతశ్రీ- స్త్యజాశ్వశైవం కులకౌశలాయ ॥ ౧౩ ॥
sa eṣa doṣaḥ puruṣa-dviḍ āste
[sa esha doshah purusha-dvid aaste]
gṛhān praviṣṭo yam apatya-matyā
[grihaan pravishto yam apatya-matyaa]
puṣṇāsi kṛṣṇād vimukho gata-śrīs
[pushnaasi krishnaad vimukho gata-shrees]
tyajāśv aśaivaṁ kula-kauśalāya
[tyajaashv ashaivam kula-kaushalaaya]
saḥ — he eṣaḥ — this doṣaḥ — offense personified puruṣa-dviṭ — envious of Lord Kṛṣṇa āste — exists gṛhān — household praviṣṭaḥ — entered yam — whom apatya-matyā — thinking to be your son puṣṇāsi — maintaining kṛṣṇāt — from Kṛṣṇa vimukhaḥ — in opposition gata-śrīḥ — devoid of everything auspicious tyaja — give up āśu — as soon as possible aśaivam — inauspicious kula — family kauśalāya — for the sake of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eṣa doṣaḥ puruṣa-dviḍ āste
saḥ
he
eṣaḥ
this
doṣaḥ
offense personified
puruṣa-dviṭ
envious of Lord Kṛṣṇa
āste
exists
gṛhān praviṣṭo yam apatya-matyā
gṛhān
household
praviṣṭaḥ
entered
yam
whom
apatya-matyā
thinking to be your son
puṣṇāsi kṛṣṇād vimukho gata-śrīs
puṣṇāsi
maintaining
kṛṣṇāt
from Kṛṣṇa
vimukhaḥ
in opposition
gata-śrīḥ
devoid of everything auspicious
tyajāśv aśaivaṁ kula-kauśalāya
tyaja
give up
āśu
as soon as possible
aśaivam
inauspicious
kula
family
kauśalāya
for the sake of.
You are maintaining offense personified, Duryodhana, as your infallible son, but he is envious of Lord Kṛṣṇa. And because you are thus maintaining a nondevotee of Kṛṣṇa, you are devoid of all auspicious qualities. Relieve yourself of this ill fortune as soon as possible and do good to the whole family!

A good son is called apatya, one who does not allow his father to fall down. The son can protect the father’s soul when the father is dead by offering sacrifices to please the Supreme Lord, Viṣṇu. This system is still prevalent in India. After the death of his father, a son goes to offer sacrifices at the lotus feet of Viṣṇu at Gayā and thus delivers the father’s soul if the father is fallen. But if the son is already an enemy of Viṣṇu, how, in such an inimical mood, can he offer sacrifice unto Lord Viṣṇu’s lotus feet? Lord Kṛṣṇa is directly the Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, and Duryodhana was inimical to Him. He would therefore be unable to protect his father, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, after his death. He himself was to fall down because of his faithlessness towards Viṣṇu. How, then, could he protect his father? Vidura advised Dhṛtarāṣṭra to get rid of such an unworthy son as Duryodhana as soon as possible if he was at all anxious to see to the good of his family.

According to the moral instructions of Cāṇakya Paṇḍita, “What is the use of a son who is neither a learned man nor a devotee of the Lord?” If a son is not a devotee of the Supreme Lord, he is just like blind eyes — a source of trouble. A physician may sometimes advise the extrication of such useless eyes from their sockets so that one can be relieved of the constant trouble. Duryodhana was exactly like blind, troubling eyes; he would be a source of great trouble to the family of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, as foreseen by Vidura. Vidura therefore rightly advised his eldest brother to get rid of this source of trouble. Dhṛtarāṣṭra was wrongly maintaining such personified offense under the mistaken impression that Duryodhana was a good son, able to liberate his father.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
“Duryodhana is fault personified since he hates the supreme lord. But he has entered your house, your mind and intelligence, and you support him and consider him your son. Because he rejects Kṛṣṇa, Lakṣmī has departed from your house. Immediately give up this inauspicious person, for the benefit of the family.” “But my son Duryodhana will oppose this.” In answer to this, Vidura speaks. He is fault personified. He has arisen as a result of your sins committed for ten million life times! He is fault personified because he hates the supreme lord (puruṣa-dviṭ). Moreover he has entered externally your houses, and internally, even your mind and intelligence. Moreover you encourage him and think of him as your son. But he is not your son. Apatya or son means “he who does not fall away (patati) from us.” You can guess that if you reject Kṛṣṇa, then prosperity will also go away. Please understand that Lakṣmī has left your house. “What is the solution?” Give up inauspicious (aśaivam) Duryodhana immediately. “If I reject my son, there will be a black spot for my family.” No. It will be a benefit to the family, for it is said that one can give up one person of the family, for the benefit of the whole family. Otherwise your whole family will perish.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.14

↗
ఇత్యూచివాంస్తత్ర సుయోధనేన ప్రవృద్ధకోపస్ఫురితాధరేణ । అసత్కృత: సత్స్పృహణీయశీల: క్షత్తా సకర్ణానుజసౌబలేన ॥ ౧౪ ॥
ity ūcivāṁs tatra suyodhanena
[ity oochivaams tatra suyodhanena]
pravṛddha-kopa-sphuritādhareṇa
[pravriddha-kopa-sphuritaadharena]
asat-kṛtaḥ sat-spṛhaṇīya-śīlaḥ
[asat-kritah sat-sprihaneeya-sheelah]
kṣattā sakarṇānuja-saubalena
[kshattaa sakarnaanuja-saubalena]
iti — thus ūcivān — while speaking tatra — there suyodhanena — by Duryodhana pravṛddha — swollen with kopa — anger sphurita — flapping adhareṇa — lips asat-kṛtaḥ — insulted sat — respectable spṛhaṇīya-śīlaḥ — desirable qualities kṣattā — Vidura sa — with karṇa — Karṇa anuja — younger brothers saubalena — with Śakuni.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity ūcivāṁs tatra suyodhanena
iti
thus
ūcivān
while speaking
tatra
there
suyodhanena
by Duryodhana
pravṛddha-kopa-sphuritādhareṇa
pravṛddha
swollen with
kopa
anger
sphurita
flapping
adhareṇa
lips
asat-kṛtaḥ sat-spṛhaṇīya-śīlaḥ
asat-kṛtaḥ
insulted
sat
respectable
spṛhaṇīya-śīlaḥ
desirable qualities
kṣattā sakarṇānuja-saubalena
kṣattā
Vidura
sa
with
karṇa
Karṇa
anuja
younger brothers
saubalena
with Śakuni.
While speaking thus, Vidura, whose personal character was esteemed by respectable persons, was insulted by Duryodhana, who was swollen with anger and whose lips were trembling. Duryodhana was in company with Karṇa, his younger brothers and his maternal uncle Śakuni.

It is said that giving good counsel to a foolish person causes the fool to become angry, just as feeding milk to a snake only increases its venomous poison. Saint Vidura was so honorable that his character was looked up to by all respectable persons. But Duryodhana was so foolish that he dared to insult Vidura. This was due to his bad association with Śakuni, his maternal uncle, as well as with his friend Karṇa, who always encouraged Duryodhana in his nefarious acts.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Vidura, who desired the best for all, spoke thus in the assembly, he was scolded by Duryodhana, whose lips began to tremble in anger, as well as by his brothers and Karṇa. Having spoken thus Vidura was scolded by Duryodhana (suyodhanena), along with Karṇa, Duḥśāsana and Śakuni.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.15

↗
క ఏనమత్రోపజుహావ జిహ్మం దాస్యా: సుతం యద్బలినైవ పుష్ట: । తస్మిన్ ప్రతీప: పరకృత్య ఆస్తే నిర్వాస్యతామాశు పురాచ్ఛ్‌వసాన: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
ka enam atropajuhāva jihmaṁ
[ka enam atropajuhaava jihmam]
dāsyāḥ sutaṁ yad-balinaiva puṣṭaḥ
[daasyaah sutam yad-balinaiva pushtah]
tasmin pratīpaḥ parakṛtya āste
[tasmin prateepah parakritya aaste]
nirvāsyatām āśu purāc chvasānaḥ
[nirvaasyataam aashu puraach chvasaanah]
kaḥ — who enam — this atra — here upajuhāva — called for jihmam — crooked dāsyāḥ — of a kept mistress sutam — son yat — whose balinā — by whose subsistence eva — certainly puṣṭaḥ — grown up tasmin — unto him pratīpaḥ — enmity para-kṛtya — enemy’s interest āste — situated nirvāsyatām — get him out āśu — immediately purāt — from the palace śvasānaḥ — let him breathe only.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ka enam atropajuhāva jihmaṁ
kaḥ
who
enam
this
atra
here
dāsyāḥ sutaṁ yad-balinaiva puṣṭaḥ
tasmin pratīpaḥ parakṛtya āste
nirvāsyatām āśu purāc chvasānaḥ
upajuhāva
called for
jihmam
crooked
dāsyāḥ
of a kept mistress
sutam
son
yat
whose
balinā
by whose subsistence
eva
certainly
puṣṭaḥ
grown up
tasmin
unto him
pratīpaḥ
enmity
para-kṛtya
enemy’s interest
āste
situated
nirvāsyatām
get him out
āśu
immediately
purāt
from the palace
śvasānaḥ
let him breathe only.
Who asked him to come here, this son of a kept mistress? He is so crooked that he spies in the interest of the enemy against those on whose support he has grown up. Toss him out of the palace immediately and leave him with only his breath.

When getting married, the kṣatriya kings would take on several other youthful girls along with the married princess. These girl attendants of the king were known as dāsīs, or attendant mistresses. By intimate association with the king, the dāsīs would get sons. Such sons were called dāsī-putras. They had no claim to a royal position, but they would get maintenance and other facilities just like princes. Vidura was the son of such a dāsī, and he was thus not counted amongst the kṣatriyas. King Dhṛtarāṣṭra was very affectionate toward his younger dāsī-putra brother, Vidura, and Vidura was a great friend and philosophical advisor to Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Duryodhana knew very well that Vidura was a great soul and well-wisher, but unfortunately he used strong words to hurt his innocent uncle. Duryodhana not only attacked Vidura’s birth, but also called him an infidel because he seemed to support the cause of Yudhiṣṭhira, whom Duryodhana considered his enemy. He desired that Vidura be immediately put out of the palace and deprived of all his possessions. If possible, he would have liked him caned until he was left with nothing but his breath. He charged that Vidura was a spy of the Pāṇḍavas because he advised King Dhṛtarāṣṭra in their favor. Such is the situation of palace life and the intricacies of diplomacy that even a faultless person like Vidura could be charged with something abominable and punished. Vidura was struck with wonder at such unexpected behavior from his nephew Duryodhana, and before anything actually happened, he decided to leave the palace for good.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
“Who has called this wicked son of a maidservant into the assembly? Betraying those who have nourished him, he supports the enemy. Drive him from the city with only his breath.” This verse describes the scolding. “Who has called him into the great assembly? He does not deserve to be called here, because he is the son of a maidservant, with low birth. Thus he is deceitful (jihmam). By his actions as well he is deceitful. He betrays his master whose food nourishes him and performs actions for the enemy. If he stays here he will destroy the whole family. Whoever is on my side should remove him from this place. Do it quickly, do not delay! Only his breath should remain. This means beat him with canes till he is breathless.” Another version has śmaśāna instead of śvasānaḥ This means “Vidura is inauspicious like a place where they burn dead bodies. Remove from this house that person who creates inauspiciousness for me. Do it quickly, otherwise he will make the whole kingdom inauspicious.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.16

↗
స్వయం ధనుర్ద్వారి నిధాయ మాయాం ర్భ్రాతు: పురో మర్మసు తాడితోఽపి । స ఇత్థమత్యుల్బణకర్ణబాణై- ర్గతవ్యథోఽయాదురు మానయాన: ॥ ౧౬ ॥
svayaṁ dhanur dvāri nidhāya māyāṁ
[svayam dhanur dvaari nidhaaya maayaam]
bhrātuḥ puro marmasu tāḍito ’pi
[bhraatuh puro marmasu taadito ’pi]
sa ittham atyulbaṇa-karṇa-bāṇair
[sa ittham atyulbana-karna-baanair]
gata-vyatho ’yād uru mānayānaḥ
[gata-vyatho ’yaad uru maanayaanah]
svayam — he himself dhanuḥ dvāri — bow on the door nidhāya — keeping māyām — the external nature bhrātuḥ — brother’s puraḥ — from the palace marmasu — in the core of the heart tāḍitaḥ — being afflicted api — in spite of saḥ — he (Vidura) ittham — like this ati-ulbaṇa — severely karṇa — ear bāṇaiḥ — by the arrows gata-vyathaḥ — without being sorry ayāt — exited uru — great māna-yānaḥ — so thinking.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
svayaṁ dhanur dvāri nidhāya māyāṁ
svayam
he himself
dhanuḥ dvāri
bow on the door
nidhāya
keeping
māyām
the external nature
bhrātuḥ puro marmasu tāḍito ’pi
bhrātuḥ
brother’s
puraḥ
from the palace
marmasu
in the core of the heart
tāḍitaḥ
being afflicted
api
in spite of
sa ittham atyulbaṇa-karṇa-bāṇair
saḥ
he (Vidura)
ittham
like this
ati-ulbaṇa
severely
karṇa
ear
bāṇaiḥ
by the arrows
gata-vyatho ’yād uru mānayānaḥ
gata-vyathaḥ
without being sorry
ayāt
exited
uru
great
māna-yānaḥ
so thinking.
Thus being pierced by arrows through his ears and afflicted to the core of his heart, Vidura placed his bow on the door and quit his brother’s palace. He was not sorry, for he considered the acts of the external energy to be supreme.

A pure devotee of the Lord is never perturbed by an awkward position created by the external energy of the Lord. In Bhagavad-gītā (3.27) it is stated:

prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ ahaṅkāra-vimūḍhātmā kartāham iti manyate

A conditioned soul is absorbed in material existence under the influence of different modes of external energy. Absorbed in the false ego, he thinks that he is doing everything by himself. The external energy of the Lord, the material nature, is fully under the control of the Supreme Lord, and the conditioned soul is fully under the grip of the external energy. Therefore, the conditioned soul is fully under the control of the law of the Lord. But, due to illusion only, he thinks himself independent in his activities. Duryodhana was acting under such influence of the external nature, by which he would be vanquished at the ultimate end. He could not accept the sound advice of Vidura, but on the contrary he insulted that great soul, who was the well-wisher of his whole family. Vidura could understand this because he was a pure devotee of the Lord. In spite of being very strongly insulted by Duryodhana’s words, Vidura could see that Duryodhana, under the influence of māyā, the external energy, was making progress on the path toward his own ruination. He therefore considered the acts of the external energy to be supreme, yet he also saw how the internal energy of the Lord helped him in that particular situation. A devotee is always in a renounced temperament because the worldly attractions can never satisfy him. Vidura was never attracted by the royal palace of his brother. He was always ready to leave the place and devote himself completely to the transcendental loving service of the Lord. Now he got the opportunity by the grace of Duryodhana, and instead of being sorry at the strong words of insult, he thanked him from within because it gave him the chance to live alone in a holy place and fully engage in the devotional service of the Lord. The word gata-vyathaḥ (without being sorry) is significant here because Vidura was relieved from the tribulations which trouble every man entangled in material activities. He therefore thought that there was no need to defend his brother with his bow because his brother was meant for ruination. Thus he left the palace before Duryodhana could act. Māyā, the supreme energy of the Lord, acted here both internally and externally.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Struck to his nerves by the sharp words of Duryodhana, directly spoken in front of him, considering that this was simply the action of māyā, without pain, Vidura, placing his bow at the door, left the palace. When the sharp words entered his ears like arrows, hitting sensitive spots (marmasu), since he did not defend himself by saying “How can you speak like this to your brother?” Vidura had dispelled his suffering. “You have blessed me, Duryodhana! You have dispelled my suffering completely. This is because, being driven out of the palace, living in some distant place, in holy places, being completely detached, what pain can I suffer, having given up attachment to persons like you?” He then left (ayāt), by his own free will. It was better that he go by his free will than be removed by the sinful. He gave up everything of that house, even the bow. When I sit alone worshipping Kṛṣṇa in the future, of what use is this bow? Or, let there be not fear from sinful Duryodhana that I will fight on the side of Bhīma. He considered the great power (uru) of māyā, thinking that Duryodhana, blinded by māyā, does not see Kṛṣṇa, though he exists in front of him. Or another meaning is “How great is the māyā of Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Lord, because, driving out the devotee of the Lord in this way, these persons will be killed by Bhīma and others!”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.17

↗
స నిర్గత: కౌరవపుణ్యలబ్ధో గజాహ్వయాత్తీర్థపద: పదాని । అన్వాక్రమత్పుణ్యచికీర్షయోర్వ్యాం అధిష్ఠితో యాని సహస్రమూర్తి: ॥ ౧౭ ॥
sa nirgataḥ kaurava-puṇya-labdho
[sa nirgatah kaurava-punya-labdho]
gajāhvayāt tīrtha-padaḥ padāni
[gajaahvayaat teertha-padah padaani]
anvākramat puṇya-cikīrṣayorvyām
[anvaakramat punya-chikeershayorvyaam]
adhiṣṭhito yāni sahasra-mūrtiḥ
[adhishthito yaani sahasra-moortih]
saḥ — he (Vidura) nirgataḥ — after having quit kaurava — the Kuru dynasty puṇya — piety labdhaḥ — so achieved gaja-āhvayāt — from Hastināpura tīrtha-padaḥ — of the Supreme Lord padāni — pilgrimages anvākramat — took shelter puṇya — piety cikīrṣayā — desiring so urvyām — of high grade adhiṣṭhitaḥ — situated yāni — all those sahasra — thousands mūrtiḥ — forms.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa nirgataḥ kaurava-puṇya-labdho
saḥ
he (Vidura)
nirgataḥ
after having quit
kaurava
the Kuru dynasty
puṇya
piety
labdhaḥ
so achieved
gajāhvayāt tīrtha-padaḥ padāni
gaja-āhvayāt
from Hastināpura
tīrtha-padaḥ
of the Supreme Lord
padāni
pilgrimages
anvākramat
took shelter
anvākramat puṇya-cikīrṣayorvyām
puṇya
piety
cikīrṣayā
desiring so
adhiṣṭhito yāni sahasra-mūrtiḥ
urvyām
of high grade
adhiṣṭhitaḥ
situated
yāni
all those
sahasra
thousands
mūrtiḥ
forms.
By his piety, Vidura achieved the advantages of the pious Kauravas. After leaving Hastināpura, he took shelter of many places of pilgrimages, which are the Lord’s lotus feet. With a desire to gain a high order of pious life, he traveled to holy places where thousands of transcendental forms of the Lord are situated.

Vidura was undoubtedly a highly elevated and pious soul; otherwise he would not have taken his birth in the Kaurava family. To have high parentage, to possess wealth, to be highly learned and to have great personal beauty are all due to past pious acts. But such pious possessions are not sufficient for obtaining the grace of the Lord and being engaged in His transcendental loving service. Vidura considered himself less pious, and therefore he decided to travel to all the great places of pilgrimage in the world in order to achieve greater piety and advance nearer to the Lord. At that time, Lord Kṛṣṇa was personally present in the world, and Vidura could have at once approached Him directly, but he did not do so because he was not sufficiently freed from sin. One cannot be one-hundred-percent devoted to the Lord unless and until he is completely free from all effects of sin. Vidura was conscious that by the association of the diplomatic Dhṛtarāṣṭra and Duryodhana he had lost his piety and was therefore not fit to associate at once with the Lord. In Bhagavad-gītā (7.28) this is confirmed in the following verse:

yeṣāṁ tv anta-gataṁ pāpaṁ janānāṁ puṇya-karmaṇām te dvandva-moha-nirmuktā bhajante māṁ dṛḍha-vratāḥ

Persons who are sinful asuras like Kaṁsa and Jarāsandha cannot think of Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Absolute Truth. Only those who are pure devotees, those who follow the regulative principles of religious life as prescribed in the scriptures, are able to engage themselves in karma-yoga and then jṣāna-yoga and thereafter, by pure meditation, can understand pure consciousness. When God consciousness is developed, one can take advantage of the association of pure devotees. Syān mahat-sevayā viprāḥ puṇya-tīrtha-niṣevaṇāt: one is able to associate with the Lord even during the existence of this life.

Places of pilgrimages are meant for eradicating the sins of the pilgrims, and they are distributed all over the universe just to give facility to all concerned for attaining pure existence and God realization. One should not be satisfied, however, merely by visiting the places of pilgrimage and performing one’s prescribed duties; he should be eager to meet the great souls who are already there, engaged in the service of the Lord. In each and every place of pilgrimage, the Lord is present in His various transcendental forms.

These forms are called arcā-mūrtis, or forms of the Lord which can be easily appreciated by the common man. The Lord is transcendental to our mundane senses. He cannot be seen with our present eyes, nor can He be heard with our present ears. To the degree that we have entered into the service of the Lord or to the proportion that our lives are freed from sins, we can perceive the Lord. But even though we are not free from sins, the Lord is kind enough to allow us the facility of seeing Him in His arcā-mūrtis in the temple. The Lord is all-powerful, and therefore He is able to accept our service by presentation of His arcā form. No one, therefore, should foolishly think the arcā in the temple to be an idol. Such an arcā-mūrti is not an idol but the Lord Himself, and to the proportion that one is free from sins, he is able to know the significance of the arcā-mūrti. The guidance of a pure devotee is therefore always required.

In the land of Bhāratavarṣa there are many hundreds and thousands of places of pilgrimage distributed all over the country, and by traditional practice the common man visits such holy places during all seasons of the year. Some of the arcā representations of the Lord situated in different places of pilgrimage are mentioned herewith. The Lord is present at Mathurā (the birthplace of Lord Kṛṣṇa) as Ādi-keśava; the Lord is present at Purī (Orissa) as Lord Jagannātha (also known as Puruṣottama); He is present at Allahabad (Prayāga) as Bindu-mādhava; at Mandara Hill He is present as Madhusūdana. In the Ānandāraṇya, He is known as Vāsudeva, Padmanābha and Janārdana; at Viṣṇukāṣcī, He is known as Viṣṇu; and at Māyāpura, He is known as Hari. There are millions and billions of such arcā forms of the Lord distributed all over the universe. All these arcā-mūrtis are summarized in the Caitanya-caritāmṛta in the following words:

sarvatra prakāśa tāṅra — bhakte sukha dite jagatera adharma nāśi’ dharma sthāpite

“The Lord has so distributed Himself all over the universe just to give pleasure to the devotees, to give the common man facility to eradicate his sins, and to establish religious principles in the world.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Leaving Hastināpura, Vidura, who was piety for the Kurus, desiring to perform beneficial acts, wandered here and there on the earth, to all the holy places of the Lord, whose two feet are sacred, where many deities of the Lord were installed. Vidura produced piety for the Kurus (kaurava-puṇya-labdhaḥ). He desired to see those places of the Lord whose two feet are holy places (tīrtha-padaḥ), thinking of those places as the Lord’s feet, in which the forms of the Lord such as Matsya and Kūrma were situated.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.18

↗
పురేషు పుణ్యోపవనాద్రికుఞ్జే- ష్వపఙ్కతోయేషు సరిత్సర:సు । అనన్తలిఙ్గై: సమలఙ్కృతేషు చచార తీర్థాయతనేష్వనన్య: ॥ ౧౮ ॥
pureṣu puṇyopavanādri-kuṣjeṣv
[pureshu punyopavanaadri-kushjeshv]
apaṅka-toyeṣu sarit-saraḥsu
[apanka-toyeshu sarit-sarahsu]
ananta-liṅgaiḥ samalaṅkṛteṣu
[ananta-lingaih samalankriteshu]
cacāra tīrthāyataneṣv ananyaḥ
[chachaara teerthaayataneshv ananyah]
pureṣu — holy places like Ayodhyā, Dvārakā and Mathurā puṇya — piety upavana — the groves adri — hill kuṣjeṣu — in the orchards apaṅka — without sin toyeṣu — in the water sarit — river saraḥsu — lakes ananta-liṅgaiḥ — the forms of the Unlimited samalaṅkṛteṣu — being so decorated cacāra — executed tīrtha — places of pilgrimage āyataneṣu — holy lands ananyaḥ — alone or seeing Kṛṣṇa alone.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pureṣu puṇyopavanādri-kuṣjeṣv
pureṣu
holy places like Ayodhyā, Dvārakā and Mathurā
puṇya
piety
upavana
the groves
adri
hill
kuṣjeṣu
in the orchards
apaṅka-toyeṣu sarit-saraḥsu
apaṅka
without sin
toyeṣu
in the water
sarit
river
saraḥsu
lakes
ananta-liṅgaiḥ samalaṅkṛteṣu
ananta-liṅgaiḥ
the forms of the Unlimited
samalaṅkṛteṣu
being so decorated
cacāra tīrthāyataneṣv ananyaḥ
cacāra
executed
tīrtha
places of pilgrimage
āyataneṣu
holy lands
ananyaḥ
alone or seeing Kṛṣṇa alone.
He began to travel alone, thinking only of Kṛṣṇa, through various holy places like Ayodhyā, Dvārakā and Mathurā. He traveled where the grove, hill, orchard, river and lake are all pure and sinless and where the forms of the Unlimited decorate the temples. Thus he performed the pilgrim’s progress.

These arcā forms of the Lord may be considered idols by the atheists, but that does not matter for persons like Vidura or His many other servants. The forms of the Lord are mentioned here as ananta-liṅga. Such forms of the Lord have unlimited potency, the same as that of the Lord Himself. There is no difference between the potencies of the arcā and those of the personal forms of the Lord. The example of the postbox and post office may be applied here. The little postboxes distributed all over the city have the same potency as the postal system in general. The duty of the post office is to carry letters from one place to another. If one puts letters in postboxes authorized by the general post office, the function of carrying letters is performed without a doubt. Similarly, the arcā-mūrti can also deliver the same unlimited potency of the Lord as when He is personally present. Vidura, therefore, could see nothing but Kṛṣṇa in the different arcā forms, and ultimately he was able to realize Kṛṣṇa alone and nothing else.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Alone he traveled to sacred places where there were forms of the Lord, in cities, in places with clear rivers and lakes, mountain groves, and pleasing gardens. Ananyaḥ means alone.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.19

↗
గాం పర్యటన్మేధ్యవివిక్తవృత్తి: సదాప్లుతోఽధ:శయనోఽవధూత: । అలక్షిత: స్వైరవధూతవేషో వ్రతాని చేరే హరితోషణాని ॥ ౧౯ ॥
gāṁ paryaṭan medhya-vivikta-vṛttiḥ
[gaam paryatan medhya-vivikta-vrittih]
sadāpluto ’dhaḥ śayano ’vadhūtaḥ
[sadaapluto ’dhah shayano ’vadhootah]
alakṣitaḥ svair avadhūta-veṣo
[alakshitah svair avadhoota-vesho]
vratāni cere hari-toṣaṇāni
[vrataani chere hari-toshanaani]
gām — earth paryaṭan — traversing medhya — pure vivikta-vṛttiḥ — independent occupation for living sadā — always āplutaḥ — sanctified adhaḥ — on the earth śayanaḥ — lying avadhūtaḥ — without dressing (of the hair, etc.) alakṣitaḥ — without being seen svaiḥ — by his relatives avadhūta-veṣaḥ — dressed like a mendicant vratāni — vows cere — performed hari-toṣaṇāni — that pleased the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gāṁ paryaṭan medhya-vivikta-vṛttiḥ
gām
earth
paryaṭan
traversing
medhya
pure
vivikta-vṛttiḥ
independent occupation for living
sadāpluto ’dhaḥ śayano ’vadhūtaḥ
sadā
always
āplutaḥ
sanctified
adhaḥ
on the earth
alakṣitaḥ svair avadhūta-veṣo
vratāni cere hari-toṣaṇāni
śayanaḥ
lying
avadhūtaḥ
without dressing (of the hair, etc.)
alakṣitaḥ
without being seen
svaiḥ
by his relatives
avadhūta-veṣaḥ
dressed like a mendicant
vratāni
vows
cere
performed
hari-toṣaṇāni
that pleased the Lord.
While so traversing the earth, he simply performed duties to please the Supreme Lord Hari. His occupation was pure and independent. He was constantly sanctified by taking his bath in holy places, although he was in the dress of a mendicant and had no hair dressing nor a bed on which to lie. Thus he was always unseen by his various relatives.

The first and foremost duty of a pilgrim is to satisfy the Supreme Lord Hari. While traveling as a pilgrim, one should not be worried about pleasing society. There is no need to depend on social formalities or occupation or dress. One should remain always absorbed in the function of pleasing the Lord. Thus sanctified by thought and action, one is able to realize the Supreme Lord by the process of a pilgrim’s journey.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Wandering over the earth, maintaining himself solely according to his pure vow, bathing constantly for purity, sleeping on the earth, not caring for his body, wearing clothing of a renunciate, and remaining unrecognized by his relatives, he performed austerities for the satisfaction of the Lord. Traveling over the earth (gām), he maintained himself by pure (medhya) unmixed (vivikta) means (this mean begging). He bathed in every holy place (sadāplutaḥ) and thus purified himself. If he touched something impure after bathing then again he took bath. He always purified himself in order to remember the mantras concerning the Lord (which required a pure body). But he did not decorate his body (avadhūtaḥ). He wore bark clothing (avadhūta-vesaḥ) and was unrecognized by his relatives.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.20

↗
ఇత్థం వ్రజన్ భారతమేవ వర్షం కాలేన యావద్‍గతవాన్ ప్రభాసమ్ । తావచ్ఛశాస క్షితిమేకచక్రా- మేకాతపత్రామజితేన పార్థ: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
itthaṁ vrajan bhāratam eva varṣaṁ
[ittham vrajan bhaaratam eva varsham]
kālena yāvad gatavān prabhāsam
[kaalena yaavad gatavaan prabhaasam]
tāvac chaśāsa kṣitim eka cakrām
[taavach chashaasa kshitim eka chakraam]
ekātapatrām ajitena pārthaḥ
[ekaatapatraam ajitena paarthah]
ittham — like this vrajan — while traveling bhāratam — India eva — only varṣam — the tract of land kālena — in due course of time yāvat — when gatavān — visited prabhāsam — the Prabhāsa pilgrimage site tāvat — at that time śaśāsa — ruled kṣitim — the world eka-cakrām — by one military force eka — one ātapatrām — flag ajitena — by the mercy of the unconquerable Kṛṣṇa pārthaḥ — Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
itthaṁ vrajan bhāratam eva varṣaṁ
ittham
like this
vrajan
while traveling
bhāratam
India
eva
only
varṣam
the tract of land
kālena yāvad gatavān prabhāsam
kālena
in due course of time
yāvat
when
gatavān
visited
prabhāsam
the Prabhāsa pilgrimage site
tāvac chaśāsa kṣitim eka cakrām
tāvat
at that time
śaśāsa
ruled
kṣitim
the world
eka-cakrām
by one military force
ekātapatrām ajitena pārthaḥ
eka
one
ātapatrām
flag
ajitena
by the mercy of the unconquerable Kṛṣṇa
pārthaḥ
Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.
Thus, when he was in the land of Bhāratavarṣa traveling to all the places of pilgrimage, he visited Prabhāsakṣetra. At that time Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the emperor and held the world under one military strength and one flag.

More than five thousand years ago, while Saint Vidura was traveling the earth as a pilgrim, India was known as Bhāratavarṣa, as it is known even today. The history of the world cannot give any systematic account for more than three thousand years into the past, but before that the whole world was under the flag and military strength of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, who was the emperor of the world. At present there are hundreds and thousands of flags flapping in the United Nations, but during the time of Vidura there was, by the grace of Ajita, Lord Kṛṣṇa, only one flag. The nations of the world are very eager to again have one state under one flag, but for this they must seek the favor of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who alone can help us become one worldwide nation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Wandering in this way over the land of Bḥārata, when in time Vidura arrived at Prabhāsa, Yudhiṣṭhira had gained control of the earth, under one army and one king, with the help of Kṛṣṇa. Yudhiṣṭhira (pārthaḥ) gained control of the earth which then had one army (eka-cakrām) and one white umbrella, symbolizing one king (ekātapatrām).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.21

↗
తత్రాథ శుశ్రావ సుహృద్వినష్టిం వనం యథా వేణుజవహ్నిసంశ్రయమ్ । సంస్పర్ధయా దగ్ధమథానుశోచన్ సరస్వతీం ప్రత్యగియాయ తూష్ణీమ్ ॥ ౨౧ ॥
tatrātha śuśrāva suhṛd-vinaṣṭiṁ
[tatraatha shushraava suhrid-vinashtim]
vanaṁ yathā veṇuja-vahni-saṁśrayam
[vanam yathaa venuja-vahni-samshrayam]
saṁspardhayā dagdham athānuśocan
[samspardhayaa dagdham athaanushochan]
sarasvatīṁ pratyag iyāya tūṣṇīm
[sarasvateem pratyag iyaaya tooshneem]
tatra — there atha — thereafter śuśrāva — heard suhṛt — kinsmen vinaṣṭim — all dead vanam — forest yathā — as much as veṇuja-vahni — fire due to the bamboos saṁśrayam — friction with one another saṁspardhayā — by violent passion dagdham — burnt atha — thus anuśocan — grieving sarasvatīm — the river Sarasvatī pratyak — westward iyāya — went tūṣṇīm — silently.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatrātha śuśrāva suhṛd-vinaṣṭiṁ
tatra
there
atha
thereafter
śuśrāva
heard
suhṛt
kinsmen
vinaṣṭim
all dead
vanaṁ yathā veṇuja-vahni-saṁśrayam
vanam
forest
yathā
as much as
veṇuja-vahni
fire due to the bamboos
saṁśrayam
friction with one another
saṁspardhayā dagdham athānuśocan
saṁspardhayā
by violent passion
dagdham
burnt
atha
thus
anuśocan
grieving
sarasvatīṁ pratyag iyāya tūṣṇīm
sarasvatīm
the river Sarasvatī
pratyak
westward
iyāya
went
tūṣṇīm
silently.
At the place of pilgrimage at Prabhāsa, it came to his knowledge that all his relatives had died due to violent passion, just as an entire forest burns due to fire produced by the friction of bamboos. After this he proceeded west, where the river Sarasvatī flows.

Both the Kauravas and the Yādavas were relatives of Vidura, and Vidura heard of their extinction due to fratricidal war. The comparison of the friction of forest bamboos to that of passionate human societies is appropriate. The whole world is compared to a forest. At any moment there may be a flare-up of fire in the forest due to friction. No one goes to the forest to set it on fire, but due only to friction between bamboos, fire takes place and burns an entire forest. Similarly, in the greater forest of worldly transaction, the fire of war takes place because of the violent passion of the conditioned souls illusioned by the external energy. Such a worldly fire can be extinguished only by the water of the mercy cloud of saints, just as a forest fire can be extinguished only by rains falling from a cloud.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In Prabhāsa he heard about the destruction of his friends by rivalry, just as a forest is burned up by fire generated by friction of bamboos. In grief he proceeded silently to the Sarasvatī River flowing west. In Prabhāsa (tatra) he heard about the destruction of his friends, the Kauravas. Because he was not friends with Duryodhana and others, some explain that destruction of friends means the destruction of the Yadus, which he heard on meeting Uddhava. This was just like a forest burning up. Pratyak means flowing west.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.22

↗
తస్యాం త్రితస్యోశనసో మనోశ్చ పృథోరథాగ్నేరసితస్య వాయో: । తీర్థం సుదాసస్య గవాం గుహస్య యచ్ఛ్రాద్ధదేవస్య స ఆసిషేవే ॥ ౨౨ ॥
tasyāṁ tritasyośanaso manoś ca
[tasyaam tritasyoshanaso manosh cha]
pṛthor athāgner asitasya vāyoḥ
[prithor athaagner asitasya vaayoh]
tīrthaṁ sudāsasya gavāṁ guhasya
[teertham sudaasasya gavaam guhasya]
yac chrāddhadevasya sa āsiṣeve
[yach chraaddhadevasya sa aasisheve]
tasyām — on the bank of the river Sarasvatī tritasya — the pilgrimage site named Trita uśanasaḥ — the pilgrimage site named Uśanā manoḥ ca — as also of the pilgrimage site named Manu pṛthoḥ — that of Pṛthu atha — thereafter agneḥ — that of Agni asitasya — that of Asita vāyoḥ — that of Vāyu tīrtham — places of pilgrimages sudāsasya — of the name Sudāsa gavām — that of Go guhasya — that of Guha yat — thereupon śrāddhadevasya — of the name Śrāddhadeva saḥ — Vidura āsiṣeve — duly visited and performed the rituals.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyāṁ tritasyośanaso manoś ca
tasyām
on the bank of the river Sarasvatī
tritasya
the pilgrimage site named Trita
uśanasaḥ
the pilgrimage site named Uśanā
manoḥ ca
as also of the pilgrimage site named Manu
pṛthor athāgner asitasya vāyoḥ
pṛthoḥ
that of Pṛthu
atha
thereafter
agneḥ
that of Agni
asitasya
that of Asita
vāyoḥ
that of Vāyu
tīrthaṁ sudāsasya gavāṁ guhasya
tīrtham
places of pilgrimages
sudāsasya
of the name Sudāsa
gavām
that of Go
guhasya
that of Guha
yac chrāddhadevasya sa āsiṣeve
yat
thereupon
śrāddhadevasya
of the name Śrāddhadeva
saḥ
Vidura
āsiṣeve
duly visited and performed the rituals.
On the bank of the river Sarasvatī there were eleven places of pilgrimage, namely (1) Trita, (2) Uśanā, (3) Manu, (4) Pṛthu, (5) Agni, (6) Asita, (7) Vāyu, (8) Sudāsa, (9) Go, (10) Guha and (11) Śrāddhadeva. Vidura visited all of them and duly performed rituals.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In that holy place he served other holy spots of Trita, Uśanas, Manu, Pṛthu, Agni, Asita, Vāyu, Sudāsa, Go, Guha, and Śraddhadeva. This is a list of holy spots.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.23

↗
అన్యాని చేహ ద్విజదేవదేవై: కృతాని నానాయతనాని విష్ణో: । ప్రత్యఙ్గముఖ్యాఙ్కితమన్దిరాణి యద్దర్శనాత్కృష్ణమనుస్మరన్తి ॥ ౨౩ ॥
anyāni ceha dvija-deva-devaiḥ
[anyaani cheha dvija-deva-devaih]
kṛtāni nānāyatanāni viṣṇoḥ
[kritaani naanaayatanaani vishnoh]
pratyaṅga-mukhyāṅkita-mandirāṇi
[pratyanga-mukhyaankita-mandiraani]
yad-darśanāt kṛṣṇam anusmaranti
[yad-darshanaat krishnam anusmaranti]
anyāni — others ca — also iha — here dvija-deva — by the great sages devaiḥ — and the demigods kṛtāni — established by nānā — various āyatanāni — various forms viṣṇoḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead prati — each and every aṅga — part mukhya — the chief aṅkita — marked mandirāṇi — temples yat — which darśanāt — by seeing from a distance kṛṣṇam — the original Personality of Godhead anusmaranti — constantly remembers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anyāni ceha dvija-deva-devaiḥ
anyāni
others
ca
also
iha
here
dvija-deva
by the great sages
devaiḥ
and the demigods
kṛtāni nānāyatanāni viṣṇoḥ
kṛtāni
established by
nānā
various
āyatanāni
various forms
viṣṇoḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
pratyaṅga-mukhyāṅkita-mandirāṇi
prati
each and every
aṅga
part
mukhya
the chief
aṅkita
marked
mandirāṇi
temples
yad-darśanāt kṛṣṇam anusmaranti
yat
which
darśanāt
by seeing from a distance
kṛṣṇam
the original Personality of Godhead
anusmaranti
constantly remembers.
There were also many other temples of various forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead Viṣṇu, established by great sages and demigods. These temples were marked with the chief emblems of the Lord, and they reminded one always of the original Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa.

Human society is divided into four social orders of life and four spiritual divisions, applying to each and every individual person. This system is called varṇāśrama-dharma and has already been discussed in many places in this great literature. The sages, or persons who completely devoted themselves to the spiritual upliftment of the entire human society, were known as dvija-deva, the best amongst the twice-born. The denizens of superior planets, from the moon planet and upwards, were known as devas. Both the dvija-devas and the devas always establish temples of Lord Viṣṇu in His various forms, such as Govinda, Madhusūdana, Nṛsiṁha, Mādhava, Keśava, Nārāyaṇa, Padmanābha, Pārtha-sārathi and many others. The Lord expands Himself in innumerable forms, but all of them are nondifferent from one another. Lord Viṣṇu has four hands, and each hand holds a particular item — either a conchshell, wheel, club or lotus flower. Of these four emblems, the cakra, or wheel, is the chief. Lord Kṛṣṇa, being the original Viṣṇu form, has only one emblem, namely the wheel, and therefore He is sometimes called the Cakrī. The Lord’s cakra is the symbol of the power by which the Lord controls the whole manifestation. The tops of Viṣṇu temples are marked with the symbol of the wheel so that people may have the chance to see the symbol from a very long distance and at once remember Lord Kṛṣṇa. The purpose of building very high temples is to give people a chance to see them from a distant place. This system is carried on in India whenever a new temple is constructed, and it appears that it is coming down from a time before recorded history. The foolish propaganda by atheists that temples were constructed only in later days is refuted here because Vidura visited these temples at least five thousand years ago, and the temples of Viṣṇu were in existence long, long before Vidura visited them. The great sages and demigods never established statues of men or demigods, but they established temples of Viṣṇu for the benefit of common men, to raise them to the platform of God consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He also served other holy places of Viṣṇu built by Ṛṣabha and other great men, and temples marked with Viṣṇu’s cakra, by seeing which men remember Kṛṣṇa. He served temples marked with the chief weapon of Viṣṇu, the cakra. Pratyaṅga means “that which is held in each of his hands.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.24

↗
తతస్త్వతివ్రజ్య సురాష్ట్రమృద్ధం సౌవీరమత్స్యాన్ కురుజాఙ్గలాంశ్చ । కాలేన తావద్యమునాముపేత్య తత్రోద్ధవం భాగవతం దదర్శ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
tatas tv ativrajya surāṣṭram ṛddhaṁ
[tatas tv ativrajya suraashtram riddham]
sauvīra-matsyān kurujāṅgalāṁś ca
[sauveera-matsyaan kurujaangalaamsh cha]
kālena tāvad yamunām upetya
[kaalena taavad yamunaam upetya]
tatroddhavaṁ bhāgavataṁ dadarśa
[tatroddhavam bhaagavatam dadarsha]
tataḥ — from there tu — but ativrajya — by passing over surāṣṭram — the kingdom of Surat ṛddham — very wealthy sauvīra — the kingdom of Sauvīra matsyān — the kingdom of Matsya kurujāṅgalān — the kingdom of western India up to the Delhi province ca — also kālena — in course of time tāvat — as soon as yamunām — bank of the river Yamunā upetya — reaching tatra — there uddhavam — Uddhava, one of the prominent Yadus bhāgavatam — the great devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa dadarśa — happened to see.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatas tv ativrajya surāṣṭram ṛddhaṁ
tataḥ
from there
tu
but
ativrajya
by passing over
surāṣṭram
the kingdom of Surat
ṛddham
very wealthy
sauvīra-matsyān kurujāṅgalāṁś ca
sauvīra
the kingdom of Sauvīra
matsyān
the kingdom of Matsya
kurujāṅgalān
the kingdom of western India up to the Delhi province
ca
also
kālena tāvad yamunām upetya
kālena
in course of time
tāvat
as soon as
yamunām
bank of the river Yamunā
upetya
reaching
tatroddhavaṁ bhāgavataṁ dadarśa
tatra
there
uddhavam
Uddhava, one of the prominent Yadus
bhāgavatam
the great devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa
dadarśa
happened to see.
Thereafter he passed through very wealthy provinces like Surat, Sauvīra and Matsya and through western India, known as Kurujāṅgala. At last he reached the bank of the Yamunā, where he happened to meet Uddhava, the great devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

The tract of land comprising about one hundred square miles from modern Delhi to the Mathurā district in Uttar Pradesh, including a portion of the Gurgaon district in Punjab (East India), is considered to be the topmost place of pilgrimage in all of India. This land is sacred because Lord Kṛṣṇa traveled through it many times. From the very beginning of His appearance, He was at Mathurā in the house of His maternal uncle Kaṁsa, and He was reared by His foster father Mahārāja Nanda at Vṛndāvana. There are still many devotees of the Lord lingering there in ecstasy in search of Kṛṣṇa and His childhood associates, the gopīs. It is not that such devotees meet Kṛṣṇa face to face in that tract of land, but a devotee’s eagerly searching after Kṛṣṇa is as good as his seeing Him personally. How this is so cannot be explained, but it is factually realized by those who are pure devotees of the Lord. Philosophically, one can understand that Lord Kṛṣṇa and His remembrance are on the absolute plane and that the very idea of searching for Him at Vṛndāvana in pure God consciousness gives more pleasure to the devotee than seeing Him face to face. Such devotees of the Lord see Him face to face at every moment, as confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.38) :

premāṣjana-cchurita-bhakti-vilocanena santaḥ sadaiva hṛdayeṣu vilokayanti yaṁ śyāmasundaram acintya-guṇa-svarūpaṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

“Those who are in ecstasy of love with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Śyāmasundara [Kṛṣṇa], see Him always in their hearts due to love and devotional service rendered to the Lord.” Both Vidura and Uddhava were such elevated devotees, and therefore they both came to the bank of the Yamunā and met each other.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After walking over the prosperous areas of Saurāṣṭra, Sauvīra, Matsya and Kurujāṅgala, after some time, when he finally arrived at the bank of the Yamunā, he saw the great person Tāvat (so much) can be ornamental or can indicate Vidura’s disturbed condition.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.25

↗
స వాసుదేవానుచరం ప్రశాన్తం బృహస్పతే: ప్రాక్ తనయం ప్రతీతమ్ । ఆలిఙ్గ్‍య గాఢం ప్రణయేన భద్రం స్వానామపృచ్ఛద్భగవత్ప్రజానామ్ ॥ ౨౫ ॥
sa vāsudevānucaraṁ praśāntaṁ
[sa vaasudevaanucharam prashaantam]
bṛhaspateḥ prāk tanayaṁ pratītam
[brihaspateh praak tanayam prateetam]
āliṅgya gāḍhaṁ praṇayena bhadraṁ
[aalingya gaadham pranayena bhadram]
svānām apṛcchad bhagavat-prajānām
[svaanaam aprichchad bhagavat-prajaanaam]
saḥ — he, Vidura vāsudeva — Lord Kṛṣṇa anucaram — constant companion praśāntam — very sober and gentle bṛhaspateḥ — of Bṛhaspati, the learned spiritual master of the demigods prāk — formerly tanayam — son or disciple pratītam — acknowledged āliṅgya — embracing gāḍham — very feelingly praṇayena — in love bhadram — auspicious svānām — his own apṛcchat — asked bhagavat — of the Personality of Godhead prajānām — family.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vāsudevānucaraṁ praśāntaṁ
saḥ
he, Vidura
vāsudeva
Lord Kṛṣṇa
anucaram
constant companion
praśāntam
very sober and gentle
bṛhaspateḥ prāk tanayaṁ pratītam
bṛhaspateḥ
of Bṛhaspati, the learned spiritual master of the demigods
prāk
formerly
tanayam
son or disciple
pratītam
acknowledged
āliṅgya gāḍhaṁ praṇayena bhadraṁ
āliṅgya
embracing
gāḍham
very feelingly
praṇayena
in love
bhadram
auspicious
svānām apṛcchad bhagavat-prajānām
svānām
his own
apṛcchat
asked
bhagavat
of the Personality of Godhead
prajānām
family.
Then, due to his great love and feeling, Vidura embraced him [Uddhava], who was a constant companion of Lord Kṛṣṇa and formerly a great student of Bṛhaspati’s. Vidura then asked him for news of the family of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead.

Vidura was older than Uddhava, like a father, and therefore when the two met, Uddhava bowed down before Vidura, and Vidura embraced him because Uddhava was younger, like a son. Vidura’s brother Pāṇḍu was Lord Kṛṣṇa’s uncle, and Uddhava was a cousin to Lord Kṛṣṇa. According to social custom, therefore, Vidura was to be respected by Uddhava on the level of his father. Uddhava was a great scholar in logic, and he was known to be a son or disciple of Bṛhaspati, the greatly learned priest and spiritual master of the demigods. Vidura asked Uddhava about the welfare of his relatives, although he already knew that they were no longer in the world. This inquiry appears to be very queer, but Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī states that the news was shocking to Vidura, who therefore inquired again due to great curiosity. Thus his inquiry was psychological and not practical.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With great affection, Vidura tightly embraced the famous, peaceful Uddhava, the associate of Kṛṣṇa, the previous student of Bṛhaspati, and inquired from him about the welfare of his relatives under the protection of Kṛṣṇa. Prāk-tanayam means that previous he was the student of Bṛhaspati. Another version has prāpta-nayanam (seeing him). Pratītam means famous. Though Vidura embraced him, Uddhava did not respond because he had fainted.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.26

↗
కచ్చిత్పురాణౌ పురుషౌ స్వనాభ్య- పాద్మానువృత్త్యేహ కిలావతీర్ణౌ । ఆసాత ఉర్వ్యా: కుశలం విధాయ కృతక్షణౌ కుశలం శూరగేహే ॥ ౨౬ ॥
kaccit purāṇau puruṣau svanābhya-
[kachchit puraanau purushau svanaabhya-]
pādmānuvṛttyeha kilāvatīrṇau
[paadmaanuvrittyeha kilaavateernau]
āsāta urvyāḥ kuśalaṁ vidhāya
[aasaata urvyaah kushalam vidhaaya]
kṛta-kṣaṇau kuśalaṁ śūra-gehe
[krita-kshanau kushalam shoora-gehe]
kaccit — whether purāṇau — the original puruṣau — Personalities of Godhead (Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma) svanābhya — Brahmā pādma-anuvṛttyā — by the request of the one who is born from the lotus iha — here kila — certainly avatīrṇau — incarnated āsāte — are urvyāḥ — in the world kuśalam — well-being vidhāya — for doing so kṛta-kṣaṇau — the elevators of everyone’s prosperity kuśalam — all well śūra-gehe — in the house of Śūrasena.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccit purāṇau puruṣau svanābhya-
kaccit
whether
purāṇau
the original
puruṣau
Personalities of Godhead (Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma)
svanābhya
Brahmā
pādmānuvṛttyeha kilāvatīrṇau
pādma-anuvṛttyā
by the request of the one who is born from the lotus
iha
here
kila
certainly
avatīrṇau
incarnated
āsāta urvyāḥ kuśalaṁ vidhāya
āsāte
are
urvyāḥ
in the world
kuśalam
well-being
vidhāya
for doing so
kṛta-kṣaṇau kuśalaṁ śūra-gehe
kṛta-kṣaṇau
the elevators of everyone’s prosperity
kuśalam
all well
śūra-gehe
in the house of Śūrasena.
[Please tell me] whether the original Personalities of Godhead, who incarnated Themselves at the request of Brahmā [who is born out of the lotus flower from the Lord] and who have increased the prosperity of the world by elevating everyone, are doing well in the house of Śūrasena.

Lord Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma are not two different Personalities of Godhead. God is one without a second, but He expands Himself in many forms without their being separate from one another. They are all plenary expansions. The immediate expansion of Lord Kṛṣṇa is Baladeva, and Brahmā, born from the lotus flower from Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, is an expansion of Baladeva. This indicates that Kṛṣṇa and Baladeva are not subjected to the regulations of the universe; on the contrary, the whole universe is under Their subjugation. They appeared at the request of Brahmā to liberate the burden of the world, and They relieved the world by many superhuman activities so that everyone became happy and prosperous. Without the grace of the Lord, no one can become happy and prosperous. Because the happiness of the family of the Lord’s devotees depends on the happiness of the Lord, Vidura first of all inquired about the well-being of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Do eternal Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma, who appeared through the prayers of Brahmā on this earth, producing auspiciousness on the earth, reside happily in the house of Vasudeva? Since the welfare of his devotees depends on the situation of the Lord, he asks about the situation of the Lord first. Sva-nābhya-pādma means Brahmā, who arises from the lotus arising from the navel of the Lord. Kṛta-ksaṇau means “making everyone joyful.” Though Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma are eternally well, he asks such a question out of prema.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.27

↗
కచ్చిత్కురూణాం పరమ: సుహృన్నో భామ: స ఆస్తే సుఖమఙ్గ శౌరి: । యో వై స్వసృణాం పితృవద్దదాతి వరాన్ వదాన్యో వరతర్పణేన ॥ ౨౭ ॥
kaccit kurūṇāṁ paramaḥ suhṛn no
[kachchit kuroonaam paramah suhrin no]
bhāmaḥ sa āste sukham aṅga śauriḥ
[bhaamah sa aaste sukham anga shaurih]
yo vai svasṝṇāṁ pitṛvad dadāti
[yo vai svasreenaam pitrivad dadaati]
varān vadānyo vara-tarpaṇena
[varaan vadaanyo vara-tarpanena]
kaccit — whether kurūṇām — of the Kurus paramaḥ — greatest suhṛt — well-wisher naḥ — our bhāmaḥ — brother-in-law saḥ — he āste — is sukham — happy aṅga — O Uddhava śauriḥ — Vasudeva yaḥ — one who vai — certainly svasṝṇām — of the sisters pitṛ-vat — like a father dadāti — gives varān — everything desirable vadānyaḥ — munificent vara — wife tarpaṇena — by pleasing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccit kurūṇāṁ paramaḥ suhṛn no
kaccit
whether
kurūṇām
of the Kurus
paramaḥ
greatest
suhṛt
well-wisher
bhāmaḥ sa āste sukham aṅga śauriḥ
yo vai svasṝṇāṁ pitṛvad dadāti
naḥ
our
bhāmaḥ
brother-in-law
saḥ
he
āste
is
sukham
happy
varān vadānyo vara-tarpaṇena
aṅga
O Uddhava
śauriḥ
Vasudeva
yaḥ
one who
vai
certainly
svasṝṇām
of the sisters
pitṛ-vat
like a father
dadāti
gives
varān
everything desirable
vadānyaḥ
munificent
vara
wife
tarpaṇena
by pleasing.
[Please tell me] whether the best friend of the Kurus, our brother-in-law Vasudeva, is doing well. He is very munificent. He is like a father to his sisters, and he is always pleasing to his wives.

Lord Kṛṣṇa’s father, Vasudeva, had sixteen wives, and one of them, named Pauravī or Rohiṇī, the mother of Baladeva, was the sister of Vidura. Vasudeva, therefore, was the husband of Vidura’s sister, and thus they were brothers-in-law. Vasudeva’s sister Kuntī was the wife of Pāṇḍu, Vidura’s elder brother, and in that sense also, Vasudeva was brother-in-law to Vidura. Kuntī was younger than Vasudeva, and it was the duty of the elder brother to treat younger sisters as daughters. Whenever anything was needed by Kuntī, it was munificently delivered by Vasudeva, due to his great love for his younger sister. Vasudeva never dissatisfied his wives, and at the same time he supplied the objects desired by his sister. He had special attention for Kuntī because she became a widow at an early age. While inquiring about Vasudeva’s welfare, Vidura remembered all about him and the family relationship.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is our friend Vasudeva, the greatest of the Kurus, and the husband of our sister, who, generous like a father to Kuntī and her sisters, gave gifts for the pleasure of their husbands? Bhāmaḥ means that Vasudeva was the husband of Vidura’s sister-in-law, since Vidura and others were brothers-in-law to Devakī through Kuntī, Vasudeva’s sister. Śauri is Vasudeva. Vasudeva had greatest affection for Kuntī among all his sisters. When it mentions here that he was like a father to his sisters, it means he had great affection for Kuntī, since he did not show such affection to the other sisters.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.28

↗
కచ్చిద్వరూథాధిపతిర్యదూనాం ప్రద్యుమ్న ఆస్తే సుఖమఙ్గ వీర: । యం రుక్‍మిణీ భగవతోఽభిలేభే ఆరాధ్య విప్రాన్ స్మరమాదిసర్గే ॥ ౨౮ ॥
kaccid varūthādhipatir yadūnāṁ
[kachchid varoothaadhipatir yadoonaam]
pradyumna āste sukham aṅga vīraḥ
[pradyumna aaste sukham anga veerah]
yaṁ rukmiṇī bhagavato ’bhilebhe
[yam rukminee bhagavato ’bhilebhe]
ārādhya viprān smaram ādi-sarge
[aaraadhya vipraan smaram aadi-sarge]
kaccit — whether varūtha — of the military adhipatiḥ — commander in chief yadūnām — of the Yadus pradyumnaḥ — the son of Kṛṣṇa named Pradyumna āste — is sukham — happy aṅga — O Uddhava vīraḥ — the great warrior yam — whom rukmiṇī — the wife of Kṛṣṇa named Rukmiṇī bhagavataḥ — from the Personality of Godhead abhilebhe — got as a prize ārādhya — pleasing viprān — brāhmaṇas smaram — Cupid (Kāmadeva) ādi-sarge — in his previous life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccid varūthādhipatir yadūnāṁ
kaccit
whether
varūtha
of the military
adhipatiḥ
commander in chief
yadūnām
of the Yadus
pradyumna āste sukham aṅga vīraḥ
pradyumnaḥ
the son of Kṛṣṇa named Pradyumna
āste
is
sukham
happy
aṅga
O Uddhava
vīraḥ
the great warrior
yaṁ rukmiṇī bhagavato ’bhilebhe
yam
whom
rukmiṇī
the wife of Kṛṣṇa named Rukmiṇī
bhagavataḥ
from the Personality of Godhead
abhilebhe
got as a prize
ārādhya viprān smaram ādi-sarge
ārādhya
pleasing
viprān
brāhmaṇas
smaram
Cupid (Kāmadeva)
ādi-sarge
in his previous life.
O Uddhava, please tell me, How is Pradyumna, the commander in chief of the Yadus, who was Cupid in a former life? Rukmiṇī bore him as her son from Lord Kṛṣṇa, by the grace of brāhmaṇas whom she pleased.

According to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, Smara (Cupid, or Kāmadeva) is one of the eternal associates of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Jīva Gosvāmī has explained this very elaborately in his treatise Kṛṣṇa-sandarbha.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Uddhava! How is the brave Pradyumna, commander of the Yadus whom Rukmiṇī obtained from the Lord after worshiping the brāhmaṇas, and who was Cupid in his previous birth. Because of his emotions, Vidura does not ask this question in proper order (since he was younger). The leader of the troops (varuthādhipatiḥ) was in his previous birth Kāmadeva (smaram). Since Kāmadeva is a devatā and Pradyumna is acting as a human, the statement is meant as praise. However the real truth is different. Kāmadeva is Pradyumna’s vibhūti or expansion. Later in the text also, many expansions are described as equal to the Lord in telling various stories. For instance Vasudeva and Devakī are identified with Pṛśnī and Sutapā by the Lord himself. Tvam eva pūrva-sarge ’bhūḥ pṛśniḥ svāyambhuve sati: you were previously Pṛśni in Svāyambhuva’s time. (SB 10.32) This however is stated only to create astonishment within the human pastimes. Similarly in the present verse, the statement that previously Pradyumna was Kāmadeva and in verse 30 the statement that Jāmbavatī performed austerities to get Kārtikeya as her son cannot be taken literally since Jāmbavatī and Rukmiṇī are the svarūpa-śakti of the Lord, and do not need to perform sādhana to get devatās as their sons.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.29

↗
కచ్చిత్సుఖం సాత్వతవృష్ణిభోజ- దాశార్హకాణామధిప: స ఆస్తే । యమభ్యషిఞ్చచ్ఛతపత్రనేత్రో నృపాసనాశాం పరిహృత్య దూరాత్ ॥ ౨౯ ॥
kaccit sukhaṁ sātvata-vṛṣṇi-bhoja-
[kachchit sukham saatvata-vrishni-bhoja-]
dāśārhakāṇām adhipaḥ sa āste
[daashaarhakaanaam adhipah sa aaste]
yam abhyaṣiṣcac chata-patra-netro
[yam abhyashishchach chata-patra-netro]
nṛpāsanāśāṁ parihṛtya dūrāt
[nripaasanaashaam parihritya dooraat]
kaccit — whether sukham — is all well sātvata — the Sātvata race vṛṣṇi — the Vṛṣṇi dynasty bhoja — the Bhoja dynasty dāśārhakāṇām — the Dāśārha race adhipaḥ — King Ugrasena saḥ — he āste — does exist yam — whom abhyaṣiṣcat — installed śata-patra-netraḥ — Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa nṛpa-āsana-āśām — hope of the royal throne parihṛtya — giving up dūrāt — at a distant place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccit sukhaṁ sātvata-vṛṣṇi-bhoja-
kaccit
whether
sukham
is all well
sātvata
the Sātvata race
vṛṣṇi
the Vṛṣṇi dynasty
bhoja
the Bhoja dynasty
dāśārhakāṇām adhipaḥ sa āste
dāśārhakāṇām
the Dāśārha race
adhipaḥ
King Ugrasena
saḥ
he
āste
does exist
yam abhyaṣiṣcac chata-patra-netro
yam
whom
abhyaṣiṣcat
installed
nṛpāsanāśāṁ parihṛtya dūrāt
śata-patra-netraḥ
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
nṛpa-āsana-āśām
hope of the royal throne
parihṛtya
giving up
dūrāt
at a distant place.
O my friend, [tell me] whether Ugrasena, the King of the Sātvatas, Vṛṣṇis, Bhojas and Dāśārhas, is now doing well. He went far away from his kingdom, leaving aside all hopes of his royal throne, but Lord Kṛṣṇa again installed him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is Ugrasena, the king of the Sātvatas, Vṛṣṇis, Bhojas, Dāśārhas, who had lived in exile and whom Kṛṣṇa established on the throne. How is Ugrasena, the king, whom, being situated far away after giving up his desire to rule (nṛpāsana āśām) out of fear for his life, and whom Kṛṣṇa (sata-patra-netraḥ) installed on the throne?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.30

↗
కచ్చిద్ధరే: సౌమ్య సుత: సద‍ృక్ష ఆస్తేఽగ్రణీ రథినాం సాధు సామ్బ: । అసూత యం జామ్బవతీ వ్రతాఢ్యా దేవం గుహం యోఽమ్బికయా ధృతోఽగ్రే ॥ ౩౦ ॥
kaccid dhareḥ saumya sutaḥ sadṛkṣa
[kachchid dhareh saumya sutah sadriksha]
āste ’graṇī rathināṁ sādhu sāmbaḥ
[aaste ’granee rathinaam saadhu saambah]
asūta yaṁ jāmbavatī vratāḍhyā
[asoota yam jaambavatee vrataadhyaa]
devaṁ guhaṁ yo ’mbikayā dhṛto ’gre
[devam guham yo ’mbikayaa dhrito ’gre]
kaccit — whether hareḥ — of the Personality of Godhead saumya — O grave one sutaḥ — son sadṛkṣaḥ — similar āste — fares well agraṇīḥ — foremost rathinām — of the warriors sādhu — well-behaved sāmbaḥ — Sāmba asūta — gave birth yam — whom jāmbavatī — Jāmbavatī, a queen of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s vratāḍhyā — enriched by vows devam — the demigod guham — of the name Kārttikeya yaḥ — whom ambikayā — unto the wife of Śiva dhṛtaḥ — born agre — in the previous birth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccid dhareḥ saumya sutaḥ sadṛkṣa
kaccit
whether
hareḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
saumya
O grave one
sutaḥ
son
sadṛkṣaḥ
similar
āste ’graṇī rathināṁ sādhu sāmbaḥ
āste
fares well
agraṇīḥ
foremost
rathinām
of the warriors
sādhu
well-behaved
sāmbaḥ
Sāmba
asūta yaṁ jāmbavatī vratāḍhyā
asūta
gave birth
yam
whom
jāmbavatī
Jāmbavatī, a queen of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s
vratāḍhyā
enriched by vows
devaṁ guhaṁ yo ’mbikayā dhṛto ’gre
devam
the demigod
guham
of the name Kārttikeya
yaḥ
whom
ambikayā
unto the wife of Śiva
dhṛtaḥ
born
agre
in the previous birth.
O gentle one, does Sāmba fare well? He exactly resembles the son of the Personality of Godhead. In a previous birth he was born as Kārttikeya in the womb of the wife of Lord Śiva, and now he has been born in the womb of Jāmbavatī, the most enriched wife of Kṛṣṇa.

Lord Śiva, one of the three qualitative incarnations of the Personality of Godhead, is the plenary expansion of the Lord. Kārttikeya, born of him, is on the level of Pradyumna, another son of Lord Kṛṣṇa. When Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa descends into the material world, all His plenary portions also appear with Him to exhibit different functions of the Lord. But for the pastimes at Vṛndāvana, all functions are performed by the Lord’s different plenary expansions. Vāsudeva is a plenary expansion of Nārāyaṇa. When the Lord appeared as Vāsudeva before Devakī and Vasudeva, He appeared in His capacity as Nārāyaṇa. Similarly, all the demigods of the heavenly kingdom appeared as associates of the Lord in the forms of Pradyumna, Sāmba, Uddhava, etc. It is learned here that Kāmadeva appeared as Pradyumna, Kārttikeya as Sāmba, and one of the Vasus as Uddhava. All of them served in their different capacities in order to enrich the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Uddhava! How is Sāmba, leader of all the great warriors, the son of Kṛṣṇa with similar form, whom previously was born to Durgā as Kārtikeya and now was born to Jāmbavatī after she performed austerities? Sadṛṣaḥ means “similar to.” Guham means Kārtikeya. Since the aṁśa and the aṁśī are considered non-different, Śiva is considered non-different from Kṛṣṇa. Similarly, Śiva’s son Kārtikeya, considered an aṁśa of Kṛṣṇa’s son Sāmba, is considered non-different from him. Or this statement can be explained in another way. When Kṛṣṇa appears on earth, Nārāyaṇa enters him and appears also. It is later said parāvareśo mahad-aṁśa-yukto: Kṛṣṇa appears with his aṁśas. (SB 3.2.15) Thus it is said that Nārāyaṇa appeared in Vasudeva’s house. (SB 10.48.24) Similarly because Kārtikeya entered Sāmba, Kāmadeva entered Pradyumna, and Vasu entered Uddhava in the same way, such statements as are made in the present verse are not wrong.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.31

↗
క్షేమం స కచ్చిద్యుయుధాన ఆస్తే య: ఫాల్గునాల్లబ్ధధనూరహస్య: । లేభేఽఞ్జసాధోక్షజసేవయైవ గతిం తదీయాం యతిభిర్దురాపామ్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
kṣemaṁ sa kaccid yuyudhāna āste
[kshemam sa kachchid yuyudhaana aaste]
yaḥ phālgunāl labdha-dhanū-rahasyaḥ
[yah phaalgunaal labdha-dhanoo-rahasyah]
lebhe ’ṣjasādhokṣaja-sevayaiva
[lebhe ’shjasaadhokshaja-sevayaiva]
gatiṁ tadīyāṁ yatibhir durāpām
[gatim tadeeyaam yatibhir duraapaam]
kṣemam — all good saḥ — he kaccit — whether yuyudhānaḥ — Sātyaki āste — is there yaḥ — one who phālgunāt — from Arjuna labdha — has achieved dhanuḥ-rahasyaḥ — one who understands the intricacies of military art lebhe — also achieved aṣjasā — easily adhokṣaja — of the Transcendence sevayā — by service eva — certainly gatim — destination tadīyām — transcendental yatibhiḥ — by great renouncers durāpām — very difficult to achieve.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣemaṁ sa kaccid yuyudhāna āste
kṣemam
all good
saḥ
he
kaccit
whether
yuyudhānaḥ
Sātyaki
āste
is there
yaḥ phālgunāl labdha-dhanū-rahasyaḥ
yaḥ
one who
phālgunāt
from Arjuna
labdha
has achieved
dhanuḥ-rahasyaḥ
one who understands the intricacies of military art
lebhe ’ṣjasādhokṣaja-sevayaiva
lebhe
also achieved
aṣjasā
easily
adhokṣaja
of the Transcendence
sevayā
by service
eva
certainly
gatiṁ tadīyāṁ yatibhir durāpām
gatim
destination
tadīyām
transcendental
yatibhiḥ
by great renouncers
durāpām
very difficult to achieve.
O Uddhava, does Yuyudhāna fare well? He learned the intricacies of the military art from Arjuna and attained the transcendental destination which is very difficult to reach even for great renouncers.

The destination of transcendence is to become the personal associate of the Personality of Godhead, who is known as adhokṣaja, He who is beyond the reach of the senses. The renouncers of the world, the sannyāsīs, give up all worldly connections, namely family, wife, children, friends, home, wealth — everything — to attain the transcendental bliss of Brahman happiness. But adhokṣaja happiness is beyond Brahman happiness. The empiric philosophers enjoy a transcendental quality of bliss by philosophical speculation on the Supreme Truth, but beyond that pleasure is the pleasure enjoyed by Brahman in His eternal form of the Personality of Godhead. Brahman bliss is enjoyed by living entities after liberation from material bondage. But Parabrahman, the Personality of Godhead, enjoys eternally a bliss of His own potency, which is called the hlādinī potency. The empiric philosopher who studies Brahman by negation of the external features has not yet learned the quality of the hlādinī potency of Brahman. Out of many potencies of the Omnipotent, there are three features of His internal potency — namely saṁvit, sandhinī and hlādinī. And in spite of their strict adherence to the principles of yama, niyama, āsana, dhyāna, dhāraṇā and prāṇāyāma, the great yogīs and jṣānīs are unable to enter into the internal potency of the Lord. This internal potency is, however, easily realized by the devotees of the Lord by dint of devotional service. Yuyudhāna achieved this stage of life, just as he achieved expert knowledge in military science from Arjuna. Thus his life was successful to the fullest extent from both the material and spiritual angles of vision. That is the way of devotional service to the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Is Sātyaki, who learned the art of archery from Arjuna with its secrets and who, serving the Supreme Lord, gained the goal hardly attained by yogīs, in good health? Yuyudhāna is Sātyaki and Phalguna is Arjuna.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.32

↗
కచ్చిద్ బుధ: స్వస్త్యనమీవ ఆస్తే శ్వఫల్కపుత్రో భగవత్ప్రపన్న: । య: కృష్ణపాదాఙ్కితమార్గపాంసు- ష్వచేష్టత ప్రేమవిభిన్నధైర్య: ॥ ౩౨ ॥
kaccid budhaḥ svasty anamīva āste
[kachchid budhah svasty anameeva aaste]
śvaphalka-putro bhagavat-prapannaḥ
[shvaphalka-putro bhagavat-prapannah]
yaḥ kṛṣṇa-pādāṅkita-mārga-pāṁsuṣv
[yah krishna-paadaankita-maarga-paamsushv]
aceṣṭata prema-vibhinna-dhairyaḥ
[acheshtata prema-vibhinna-dhairyah]
kaccit — whether budhaḥ — very learned svasti — well anamīvaḥ — faultless āste — does exist śvaphalka-putraḥ — the son of Śvaphalka, Akrūra bhagavat — regarding the Personality of Godhead prapannaḥ — surrendered yaḥ — one who kṛṣṇa — the Lord pāda-aṅkita — marked with footprints mārga — path pāṁsuṣu — in the dust aceṣṭata — rolled about prema-vibhinna — lost in transcendental love dhairyaḥ — mental equilibrium.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccid budhaḥ svasty anamīva āste
kaccit
whether
budhaḥ
very learned
svasti
well
anamīvaḥ
faultless
āste
does exist
śvaphalka-putro bhagavat-prapannaḥ
śvaphalka-putraḥ
the son of Śvaphalka, Akrūra
bhagavat
regarding the Personality of Godhead
prapannaḥ
surrendered
yaḥ kṛṣṇa-pādāṅkita-mārga-pāṁsuṣv
yaḥ
one who
kṛṣṇa
the Lord
pāda-aṅkita
marked with footprints
mārga
path
pāṁsuṣu
in the dust
aceṣṭata prema-vibhinna-dhairyaḥ
aceṣṭata
rolled about
prema-vibhinna
lost in transcendental love
dhairyaḥ
mental equilibrium.
Please tell me whether Akrūra, the son of Śvaphalka, is doing well. He is a faultless soul surrendered unto the Personality of Godhead. He once lost his mental equilibrium due to his ecstasy of transcendental love and fell down on the dust of a road which was marked with the footprints of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

When Akrūra came to Vṛndāvana in search of Kṛṣṇa, he saw the footprints of the Lord on the dust of Nanda-grāma and at once fell on them in ecstasy of transcendental love. This ecstasy is possible for a devotee who is fully absorbed in incessant thoughts of Kṛṣṇa. Such a pure devotee of the Lord is naturally faultless because he is always associated with the supremely pure Personality of Godhead. Constant thought of the Lord is the antiseptic method for keeping oneself free from the infectious contamination of the material qualities. The pure devotee of the Lord is always in company with the Lord by thinking of Him. Yet, in the particular context of time and place, the transcendental emotions take a different turn, and this breaks the mental equilibrium of the devotee. Lord Caitanya displayed the typical example of transcendental ecstasy, as we can understand from the life of this incarnation of God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is wise, sinless Akrūra, surrendered to the Lord, who, losing control out of strong prema, rolled in the dusty path marked by the footprints of Kṛṣṇa? Sinless (anamīvaḥ) Akrūra (śaphalka-putraḥ) moved about (acestata) in the dust at the entrance to Vraja.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.33

↗
కచ్చిచ్ఛివం దేవకభోజపుత్ర్యా విష్ణుప్రజాయా ఇవ దేవమాతు: । యా వై స్వగర్భేణ దధార దేవం త్రయీ యథా యజ్ఞవితానమర్థమ్ ॥ ౩౩ ॥
kaccic chivaṁ devaka-bhoja-putryā
[kachchich chivam devaka-bhoja-putryaa]
viṣṇu-prajāyā iva deva-mātuḥ
[vishnu-prajaayaa iva deva-maatuh]
yā vai sva-garbheṇa dadhāra devaṁ
[yaa vai sva-garbhena dadhaara devam]
trayī yathā yajṣa-vitānam artham
[trayee yathaa yajsha-vitaanam artham]
kaccit — whether śivam — everything well devaka-bhoja-putryāḥ — of the daughter of King Devaka-bhoja viṣṇu-prajāyāḥ — of she who gave birth to the Personality of Godhead iva — like that of deva-mātuḥ — of the mother of the demigods (Aditi) yā — one who vai — indeed sva-garbheṇa — by her own womb dadhāra — conceived devam — the Supreme Lord trayī — the Vedas yathā — as much as yajṣa-vitānam — of spreading the sacrifice artham — purpose.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccic chivaṁ devaka-bhoja-putryā
kaccit
whether
śivam
everything well
devaka-bhoja-putryāḥ
of the daughter of King Devaka-bhoja
viṣṇu-prajāyā iva deva-mātuḥ
viṣṇu-prajāyāḥ
of she who gave birth to the Personality of Godhead
iva
like that of
deva-mātuḥ
of the mother of the demigods (Aditi)
yā vai sva-garbheṇa dadhāra devaṁ
yā
one who
vai
indeed
sva-garbheṇa
by her own womb
dadhāra
conceived
devam
the Supreme Lord
trayī yathā yajṣa-vitānam artham
trayī
the Vedas
yathā
as much as
yajṣa-vitānam
of spreading the sacrifice
artham
purpose.
As the Vedas are the reservoir of sacrificial purposes, so the daughter of King Devaka-bhoja conceived the Supreme Personality of Godhead in her womb, as did the mother of the demigods. Is she [Devakī] doing well?

The Vedas are full of transcendental knowledge and spiritual values, and thus Devakī, the mother of Lord Kṛṣṇa, conceived the Lord in her womb as the personified meaning of the Vedas. There is no difference between the Vedas and the Lord. The Vedas aim at the understanding of the Lord, and the Lord is the Vedas personified. Devakī is compared to the meaningful Vedas, and the Lord to their purpose personified.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is Devakī, who, like Aditi, who also gave birth to the Lord, held in her womb the Lord, and who was just like the three Vedas containing the meaning of sacrifice? The daughter of Devaka, Devakī, was like Aditi, who had Viṣṇu as her son.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.34

↗
అపిస్విదాస్తే భగవాన్ సుఖం వో య: సాత్వతాం కామదుఘోఽనిరుద్ధ: । యమామనన్తి స్మ హి శబ్దయోనిం మనోమయం సత్త్వతురీయతత్త్వమ్ ॥ ౩౪ ॥
apisvid āste bhagavān sukhaṁ vo
[apisvid aaste bhagavaan sukham vo]
yaḥ sātvatāṁ kāma-dugho ’niruddhaḥ
[yah saatvataam kaama-dugho ’niruddhah]
yam āmananti sma hi śabda-yoniṁ
[yam aamananti sma hi shabda-yonim]
mano-mayaṁ sattva-turīya-tattvam
[mano-mayam sattva-tureeya-tattvam]
api — as also svit — whether āste — does He bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead sukham — all happiness vaḥ — of you yaḥ — one who sātvatām — of the devotees kāma-dughaḥ — source of all desires aniruddhaḥ — the plenary expansion Aniruddha yam — whom āmananti — they accept sma — from yore hi — certainly śabda-yonim — the cause of the Ṛg Veda manaḥ-mayam — creator of the mind sattva — transcendental turīya — the fourth expansion tattvam — principle.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apisvid āste bhagavān sukhaṁ vo
api
as also
svit
whether
āste
does He
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
sukham
all happiness
yaḥ sātvatāṁ kāma-dugho ’niruddhaḥ
vaḥ
of you
yam āmananti sma hi śabda-yoniṁ
yaḥ
one who
sātvatām
of the devotees
kāma-dughaḥ
source of all desires
mano-mayaṁ sattva-turīya-tattvam
aniruddhaḥ
the plenary expansion Aniruddha
yam
whom
āmananti
they accept
sma
from yore
hi
certainly
śabda-yonim
the cause of the Ṛg Veda
manaḥ-mayam
creator of the mind
sattva
transcendental
turīya
the fourth expansion
tattvam
principle.
May I inquire whether Aniruddha is doing well? He is the fulfiller of all the desires of the pure devotees and has been considered from yore to be the cause of the Ṛg Veda, the creator of the mind and the fourth plenary expansion of Viṣṇu.

Ādi-caturbhuja, the original expansions from Baladeva, are Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. All of Them are viṣṇu-tattvas, or nondifferent Personalities of Godhead. In the incarnation of Śrī Rāma, all these different expansions appeared for particular pastimes. Lord Rāma is the original Vāsudeva, and His brothers were Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. Aniruddha is also the cause of Mahā-Viṣṇu, from whose breathing the Ṛg Veda appeared. All this is nicely explained in the Mārkaṇḍeya Purāṇa. In the incarnation of Lord Kṛṣṇa, Aniruddha appeared as the son of the Lord. Lord Kṛṣṇa in Dvārakā is the Vāsudeva expansion of the original group. The original Lord Kṛṣṇa never leaves Goloka Vṛndāvana. All the plenary expansions are one and the same viṣṇu-tattva, and there is no difference in Their potency.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is Aniruddha, fulfiller of all desires of the devotees, whom the sages call the source of the Vedas, who is instigates action of the mind, is śuddha-sattva and is the fourth member of the catur-vyūha? Sātvatām can refer to the Yādavas or can mean devotees. He is called the source of the Vedas because the Vedas appear from his breathing. Evaṁ vā are asya mahato bhūtasya niḥśvasitam etad yad ṛgveda: From the Lord’s breathing arose the Ṛg-veda. (Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad) Manomaya means “he who moves (mayate) the mind.” He is the instigator of mental activities. He is the fourth member (turīya) of the catur-vyūha (tattvam) composed of śudda-sattva. Being bound up during the conflict of arrows is a pastime created by his own will, similar to the pastimes of Rāmacandra. That he is part of the catur-vyūha is show in the answers of Mārkandeya to Vraja in the Viṣnu-dharmottara. bhūyo bhūyas tv asau dṛṣṭo māyā devo jagat-patiḥ kalpa-kṣaye na vijṣātaḥ sa mayā mohitena vai kalpa-kṣaye vyatīte tu tan tu devaṁ pitāmahāt aniruddhāṁ vijānāmi pitaraṁ te jagat-patim The Lord of the universe seen by me again and again at the end of the kalpa was unknown to me, since I was covered by illusion. When the destruction at the end of the kalpa ended, I understood from Brahmā that the lord of the universe is your father, Aniruddha. Viṣṇu-dharmottara 1.79.2-3 When Bhīṣma begins to speak to Duryodhana about the appearance of Kṛṣṇa, he relates how Brahmā came to Gandhamādana and saw in his mind the Lord as Aniruddha. sṛṣṭvā saṅkarṣanaṁ devaṁ svayam ātmānam ātmanā kṛṣṇsattvam ātmanāṣrākṣīḥ pradyumnaṁ hy ātmā-sambhavam pradyumnāc cāniruddhaṁ tu yaḥ vidur viṣṇum avyayam aniruddho ’sṛjan māṁ vai brahmāṇaṁ loka-dhāriṇam vāsudeva-mayaḥ so ’haṁ tvayaivāsmi vinirmitah Having manifested Saṅkarṣaṇa, non-different from himself by his own potency, from himself the Lord manifested Pradyumna, non-different from Kṛṣṇa, by his own potency. From Pradyumna he manifested Aniruddha whom the wise know as indestructible Viṣṇu. Aniruddha created me, Brahmā, the maintainer of the worlds. Aniruddha is non-different from Vāsudeva. Thus I have been created by you. Mahā-bhārata 6.61.65-67
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.35

↗
అపిస్విదన్యే చ నిజాత్మదైవ- మనన్యవృత్త్యా సమనువ్రతా యే । హృదీకసత్యాత్మజచారుదేష్ణ- గదాదయ: స్వస్తి చరన్తి సౌమ్య ॥ ౩౫ ॥
apisvid anye ca nijātma-daivam
[apisvid anye cha nijaatma-daivam]
ananya-vṛttyā samanuvratā ye
[ananya-vrittyaa samanuvrataa ye]
hṛdīka-satyātmaja-cārudeṣṇa-
[hrideeka-satyaatmaja-chaarudeshna-]
gadādayaḥ svasti caranti saumya
[gadaadayah svasti charanti saumya]
api — as also svit — whether anye — others ca — and nija-ātma — of one’s own self daivam — Śrī Kṛṣṇa ananya — absolutely vṛttyā — faith samanuvratāḥ — followers ye — all those who hṛdīka — Hṛdīka satya-ātmaja — the son of Satyabhāmā cārudeṣṇa — Cārudeṣṇa gada — Gada ādayaḥ — and others svasti — all well caranti — pass time saumya — O sober one.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apisvid anye ca nijātma-daivam
api
as also
svit
whether
anye
others
ca
and
nija-ātma
of one’s own self
daivam
Śrī Kṛṣṇa
ananya-vṛttyā samanuvratā ye
ananya
absolutely
vṛttyā
faith
samanuvratāḥ
followers
ye
all those who
hṛdīka-satyātmaja-cārudeṣṇa-
hṛdīka
Hṛdīka
satya-ātmaja
the son of Satyabhāmā
cārudeṣṇa
Cārudeṣṇa
gadādayaḥ svasti caranti saumya
gada
Gada
ādayaḥ
and others
svasti
all well
caranti
pass time
saumya
O sober one.
O sober one, others, such as Hṛdīka, Cārudeṣṇa, Gada and the son of Satyabhāmā, who accept Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa as the soul of the self and thus follow His path without deviation — are they well?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How are others such as Hṛdīka, the son of Satyabhāmā, Cārudeṣṇa and Gada, completely dedicated to Kṛṣṇa with all their senses, whose very soul was Kṛṣṇa? Nijātma-daivam means that they accepted Kṛṣṇa (daivam) as the form of their good fortune. They completely followed Kṛṣṇa (samanuvratā).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.36

↗
అపి స్వదోర్భ్యాం విజయాచ్యుతాభ్యాం ధర్మేణ ధర్మ: పరిపాతి సేతుమ్ । దుర్యోధనోఽతప్యత యత్సభాయాం సామ్రాజ్యలక్ష్మ్యా విజయానువృత్త్యా ॥ ౩౬ ॥
api sva-dorbhyāṁ vijayācyutābhyāṁ
[api sva-dorbhyaam vijayaachyutaabhyaam]
dharmeṇa dharmaḥ paripāti setum
[dharmena dharmah paripaati setum]
duryodhano ’tapyata yat-sabhāyāṁ
[duryodhano ’tapyata yat-sabhaayaam]
sāmrājya-lakṣmyā vijayānuvṛttyā
[saamraajya-lakshmyaa vijayaanuvrittyaa]
api — as also sva-dorbhyām — own arms vijaya — Arjuna acyutā-bhyām — along with Śrī Kṛṣṇa dharmeṇa — on religious principles dharmaḥ — King Yudhiṣṭhira paripāti — maintains setum — the respect of religion duryodhanaḥ — Duryodhana atapyata — envied yat — whose sabhāyām — royal assembly sāmrājya — imperial lakṣmyā — opulence vijaya-anuvṛttyā — by the service of Arjuna.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
api sva-dorbhyāṁ vijayācyutābhyāṁ
api
as also
sva-dorbhyām
own arms
vijaya
Arjuna
acyutā-bhyām
along with Śrī Kṛṣṇa
dharmeṇa dharmaḥ paripāti setum
dharmeṇa
on religious principles
dharmaḥ
King Yudhiṣṭhira
paripāti
maintains
setum
the respect of religion
duryodhano ’tapyata yat-sabhāyāṁ
duryodhanaḥ
Duryodhana
atapyata
envied
yat
whose
sabhāyām
royal assembly
sāmrājya-lakṣmyā vijayānuvṛttyā
sāmrājya
imperial
lakṣmyā
opulence
vijaya-anuvṛttyā
by the service of Arjuna.
Also let me inquire whether Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira is now maintaining the kingdom according to religious principles and with respect for the path of religion. Formerly Duryodhana was burning with envy because Yudhiṣṭhira was being protected by the arms of Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna as if they were his own arms.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the emblem of religion. When he was ruling his kingdom with the help of Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the opulence of his kingdom surpassed all imaginations of the opulence of the kingdom of heaven. His actual arms were Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, and thus he surpassed everyone’s opulence. Duryodhana, being envious of this opulence, planned so many schemes to put Yudhiṣṭhira into difficulty, and at last the Battle of Kurukṣetra was brought about. After the Battle of Kurukṣetra, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was again able to rule his legitimate kingdom, and he reinstated the principles of honor and respect for religion. That is the beauty of a kingdom ruled by a pious king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Is Yudhiṣṭhira along with his two arms Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna maintaining the boundaries of dharma by proper principles? In his assembly Duryodhana became envious on seeing the wealth of governance conforming to the highest excellence? In six verses Vidura asks about the Pāṇḍavas. Yudhiṣṭhira, (dharmaḥ) using his two arms in the form of Arjuna and Kṛṣṇa, protected the limits of dharma (setum). Duryodhana became envious of the wealth of governance which was in compliance with the highest excellence (vijayānuvrttyā).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.37

↗
కిం వా కృతాఘేష్వఘమత్యమర్షీ భీమోఽహివద్దీర్ఘతమం వ్యముఞ్చత్ । యస్యాఙ్‌ఘ్రి పాతం రణభూర్న సేహే మార్గం గదాయాశ్చరతో విచిత్రమ్ ॥ ౩౭ ॥
kiṁ vā kṛtāgheṣv agham atyamarṣī
[kim vaa kritaagheshv agham atyamarshee]
bhīmo ’hivad dīrghatamaṁ vyamuṣcat
[bheemo ’hivad deerghatamam vyamushchat]
yasyāṅghri-pātaṁ raṇa-bhūr na sehe
[yasyaanghri-paatam rana-bhoor na sehe]
mārgaṁ gadāyāś carato vicitram
[maargam gadaayaash charato vichitram]
kim — whether vā — either kṛta — performed agheṣu — unto the sinners agham — anger ati-amarṣī — unconquerable bhīmaḥ — Bhīma ahi-vat — like a cobra dīrgha-tamam — long-cherished vyamuṣcat — has released yasya — whose aṅghri-pātam — putting on the steps raṇa-bhūḥ — the field of battle na — could not sehe — tolerate mārgam — the path gadāyāḥ — by the clubs carataḥ — playing vicitram — wonderful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kiṁ vā kṛtāgheṣv agham atyamarṣī
kim
whether
vā
either
kṛta
performed
agheṣu
unto the sinners
agham
anger
ati-amarṣī
unconquerable
bhīmo ’hivad dīrghatamaṁ vyamuṣcat
bhīmaḥ
Bhīma
ahi-vat
like a cobra
dīrgha-tamam
long-cherished
vyamuṣcat
has released
yasyāṅghri-pātaṁ raṇa-bhūr na sehe
yasya
whose
aṅghri-pātam
putting on the steps
raṇa-bhūḥ
the field of battle
na
could not
sehe
tolerate
mārgaṁ gadāyāś carato vicitram
mārgam
the path
gadāyāḥ
by the clubs
carataḥ
playing
vicitram
wonderful.
[Please tell me] whether the unconquerable Bhīma, who is like a cobra, has released his long-cherished anger upon the sinners? The field of battle could not tolerate even the wonderful playing of his club when he stepped on the path.

Vidura knew the strength of Bhīma. Whenever Bhīma was on the battlefield, his steps on the path and the wonderful playing of his club were unbearable for the enemy. Powerful Bhīma did not take steps against the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra for a long time. Vidura’s inquiry was whether he had yet released his anger, which was like that of a suffering cobra. When a cobra releases its venom after long-cherished anger, its victim cannot survive.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Has snake-like, intensely angry Bhīma, wandering over the battle field with his club and other weapons, whose footsteps the battlefield could not tolerate, given up his long standing anger towards those who offended him? Has snake-like Bhīma given up the impurity (agham), like poison, caused by thinking for a long time of killing the Kurus who offended him?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.38

↗
కచ్చిద్యశోధా రథయూథపానాం గాణ్డీవధన్వోపరతారిరాస్తే । అలక్షితో యచ్ఛరకూటగూఢో మాయాకిరాతో గిరిశస్తుతోష ॥ ౩౮ ॥
kaccid yaśodhā ratha-yūthapānāṁ
[kachchid yashodhaa ratha-yoothapaanaam]
gāṇḍīva-dhanvoparatārir āste
[gaandeeva-dhanvoparataarir aaste]
alakṣito yac-chara-kūṭa-gūḍho
[alakshito yach-chara-koota-goodho]
māyā-kirāto giriśas tutoṣa
[maayaa-kiraato girishas tutosha]
kaccit — whether yaśaḥ-dhā — famous ratha-yūthapānām — amongst the great chariot warriors gāṇḍīva — Gāṇḍīva dhanvā — bow uparata-ariḥ — one who has vanquished the enemies āste — doing well alakṣitaḥ — without being identified yat — whose śara-kūṭa-gūḍhaḥ — being covered by arrows māyā-kirātaḥ — false hunter giriśaḥ — Lord Śiva tutoṣa — was satisfied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaccid yaśodhā ratha-yūthapānāṁ
kaccit
whether
yaśaḥ-dhā
famous
ratha-yūthapānām
amongst the great chariot warriors
gāṇḍīva-dhanvoparatārir āste
gāṇḍīva
Gāṇḍīva
dhanvā
bow
uparata-ariḥ
one who has vanquished the enemies
āste
doing well
alakṣito yac-chara-kūṭa-gūḍho
alakṣitaḥ
without being identified
yat
whose
māyā-kirāto giriśas tutoṣa
śara-kūṭa-gūḍhaḥ
being covered by arrows
māyā-kirātaḥ
false hunter
giriśaḥ
Lord Śiva
tutoṣa
was satisfied.
[Please tell me] whether Arjuna, whose bow bears the name Gāṇḍīva and who is always famous amongst the chariot warriors for vanquishing his enemies, is doing well. He once satisfied Lord Śiva by covering him with arrows when Śiva came as an unidentified false hunter.

Lord Śiva tested Arjuna’s strength by picking a quarrel with him over a hunted boar. He confronted Arjuna in the false dress of a hunter, and Arjuna covered him with arrows until Lord Śiva was satisfied with Arjuna’s fighting. He offered Arjuna the Pāśupati weapon and blessed him. Here Vidura inquired about the great warrior’s well-being.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How is Arjuna, famous among greatest of warriors, destroyer of enemies with his Gāṇḍiva bow, who satisfied Śiva, disguised as a hunter, after Śiva was covered with Arjuna’s multitude of arrows? Arjuna was famous (yaśodhā) among the best of the chariot fighters. He was the destroyer of the enemy (uparatāriḥ). Śiva was covered (gūḍhaḥ) with a mass of arrows.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.39

↗
యమావుతస్విత్తనయౌ పృథాయా: పార్థైర్వృతౌ పక్ష్మభిరక్షిణీవ । రేమాత ఉద్దాయ మృధే స్వరిక్థం పరాత్సుపర్ణావివ వజ్రివక్త్రాత్ ॥ ౩౯ ॥
yamāv utasvit tanayau pṛthāyāḥ
[yamaav utasvit tanayau prithaayaah]
pārthair vṛtau pakṣmabhir akṣiṇīva
[paarthair vritau pakshmabhir akshineeva]
remāta uddāya mṛdhe sva-rikthaṁ
[remaata uddaaya mridhe sva-riktham]
parāt suparṇāv iva vajri-vaktrāt
[paraat suparnaav iva vajri-vaktraat]
yamau — twins (Nakula and Sahadeva) utasvit — whether tanayau — sons pṛthāyāḥ — of Pṛthā pārthaiḥ — by the sons of Pṛthā vṛtau — protected pakṣmabhiḥ — by the shields akṣiṇī — of the eyes iva — like remāte — playing carelessly uddāya — snatching mṛdhe — in the fight sva-riktham — own property parāt — from the enemy Duryodhana suparṇau — Garuḍa, the carrier of Lord Viṣṇu iva — like vajri-vaktrāt — from the mouth of Indra.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yamāv utasvit tanayau pṛthāyāḥ
yamau
twins (Nakula and Sahadeva)
utasvit
whether
tanayau
sons
pṛthāyāḥ
of Pṛthā
pārthair vṛtau pakṣmabhir akṣiṇīva
pārthaiḥ
by the sons of Pṛthā
vṛtau
protected
pakṣmabhiḥ
by the shields
akṣiṇī
of the eyes
iva
like
remāta uddāya mṛdhe sva-rikthaṁ
remāte
playing carelessly
uddāya
snatching
mṛdhe
in the fight
sva-riktham
own property
parāt suparṇāv iva vajri-vaktrāt
parāt
from the enemy Duryodhana
suparṇau
Garuḍa, the carrier of Lord Viṣṇu
iva
like
vajri-vaktrāt
from the mouth of Indra.
Are the twin brothers who are protected by their brothers doing well? Just as the eye is always protected by the eyelid, they are protected by the sons of Pṛthā, who snatched back their rightful kingdom from the hands of their enemy Duryodhana, just as Garuḍa snatched nectar from the mouth of Indra, the thunderbolt carrier.

Indra, the King of heaven, carries a thunderbolt in his hand and is very strong, yet Garuḍa, the carrier of Lord Viṣṇu, was able to snatch nectar from his mouth. Similarly, Duryodhana was as strong as the King of heaven, and still the sons of Pṛthā, the Pāṇḍavas, were able to snatch away their kingdom from Duryodhana. Both Garuḍa and the Pārthas are pet devotees of the Lord, and thus it was possible for them to face such strong enemies.

Vidura’s inquiry was about the youngest brothers of the Pāṇḍavas, namely Nakula and Sahadeva. These twin brothers were sons of Mādrī, the stepmother of the other Pāṇḍavas. But although they were stepbrothers, because Kuntī took charge of them after the departure of Mādrī with her husband Mahārāja Pāṇḍu, Nakula and Sahadeva were as good as the other three Pāṇḍavas, namely Yudhiṣṭhira, Bhīma and Arjuna. The five brothers are known in the world as regular brothers. The three elder Pāṇḍavas took care of the younger brothers, just as the eyelid takes care of the eye. Vidura was anxious to know whether, after winning back their own kingdom from the hands of Duryodhana, the younger brothers were still living happily under the care of the elder brothers.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Are the twins Nakula and Sahadeva, sons of Kuntī, protected by the Pāṇḍavas like eyelashes protect the two eyes, enjoying, after they snatched the kingdom from Duryodhana in battle, just as two Garuḍas snatch nectar from the mouth of Indra? Though Nakula and Sahadeva were the sons of Mādrī, they were also considered the sons of Kuntī, for just as the two eyes are surrounded by eyelashes, they were surrounded by the sons of Kuntī. They were protected like jewels. Snatching away (uddāya) the kingdom (sva-rktham) from the enemy (parāt), Duryodhana, like two Garuḍas snatching the nectar from the mouth of Indra (vajri-vaktrāt), are they now enjoying? Or another meaning is as follows. After the Pāṇḍavas snatched away the kingdom from the enemy, do the twins enjoy like birds who, after having stolen nectar from Indra’s mouth, are protected by the Pāṇḍavas? Comparing the twins to Garuḍas is an example of adbhūta upameya (astonishing comparison).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.40

↗
అహో పృథాపి ధ్రియతేఽర్భకార్థే రాజర్షివర్యేణ వినాపి తేన । యస్త్వేకవీరోఽధిరథో విజిగ్యే ధనుర్ద్వితీయ: కకుభశ్చతస్ర: ॥ ౪౦ ॥
aho pṛthāpi dhriyate ’rbhakārthe
[aho prithaapi dhriyate ’rbhakaarthe]
rājarṣi-varyeṇa vināpi tena
[raajarshi-varyena vinaapi tena]
yas tv eka-vīro ’dhiratho vijigye
[yas tv eka-veero ’dhiratho vijigye]
dhanur dvitīyaḥ kakubhaś catasraḥ
[dhanur dviteeyah kakubhash chatasrah]
aho — O my lord pṛthā — Kuntī api — also dhriyate — bears her life arbhaka-arthe — for the sake of fatherless children rājarṣi — King Pāṇḍu varyeṇa — the best vinā api — without him tena — him yaḥ — one who tu — but eka — alone vīraḥ — the warrior adhirathaḥ — commander vijigye — could conquer dhanuḥ — the bow dvitīyaḥ — the second kakubhaḥ — directions catasraḥ — four.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho pṛthāpi dhriyate ’rbhakārthe
aho
O my lord
pṛthā
Kuntī
api
also
dhriyate
bears her life
arbhaka-arthe
for the sake of fatherless children
rājarṣi-varyeṇa vināpi tena
rājarṣi
King Pāṇḍu
varyeṇa
the best
vinā api
without him
tena
him
yas tv eka-vīro ’dhiratho vijigye
yaḥ
one who
tu
but
eka
alone
vīraḥ
the warrior
adhirathaḥ
commander
vijigye
could conquer
dhanur dvitīyaḥ kakubhaś catasraḥ
dhanuḥ
the bow
dvitīyaḥ
the second
kakubhaḥ
directions
catasraḥ
four.
O my lord, is Pṛthā still living? She lived only for the sake of her fatherless children; otherwise it was impossible for her to live without King Pāṇḍu, who was the greatest commander and who alone conquered the four directions simply with the help of a second bow.

A faithful wife cannot live without her lord, the husband, and therefore all widows used to voluntarily embrace the burning fire which consumed the dead husband. This system was very common in India because all the wives were chaste and faithful to their husbands. Later on, with the advent of the Age of Kali, the wives gradually began to be less adherent to their husbands, and the voluntary embrace of the fire by the widows became a thing of the past. Very recently the system was abolished, since the voluntary system had become a forcible social custom.

When Mahārāja Pāṇḍu died, both his wives, namely Kuntī and Mādrī, were prepared to embrace the fire, but Mādrī requested Kuntī to live for the sake of the younger children, the five Pāṇḍavas. This was agreed upon by Kuntī at the added request of Vyāsadeva. In spite of her great bereavement, Kuntī decided to live, not to enjoy life in the absence of her husband, but only to give protection to the children. This incident is referred to here by Vidura because he knew all the facts about his sister-in-law Kuntīdevī. It is understood that Mahārāja Pāṇḍu was a great warrior and that he alone, with the help of bow and arrow, could conquer the world’s four directions. In the absence of such a husband, it was almost impossible for Kuntī to live on even as a widow, but she had to do it for the sake of the five children.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! How is Kuntī, who maintained her life only for the sake of her young sons in the absence of her husband Pāṇḍu, who without assistance of others, conquered the four directions with the assistance of only his bow? In stating that Kuntī lived for preservation of her sons, the intention is to ask about her well being. Aho expresses astonishment. “What are you saying?” Without her husband, Pāṇḍu, she lived only to raise her sons. If they had not been present, she would not have maintained her life. Pāṇḍu, without assistance (eka-vīraḥ), and whose bow was the second person assisting him, conquered the four directions.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.41

↗
సౌమ్యానుశోచే తమధ:పతన్తం భ్రాత్రే పరేతాయ విదుద్రుహే య: । నిర్యాపితో యేన సుహృత్స్వపుర్యా అహం స్వపుత్రాన్ సమనువ్రతేన ॥ ౪౧ ॥
saumyānuśoce tam adhaḥ-patantaṁ
[saumyaanushoche tam adhah-patantam]
bhrātre paretāya vidudruhe yaḥ
[bhraatre paretaaya vidudruhe yah]
niryāpito yena suhṛt sva-puryā
[niryaapito yena suhrit sva-puryaa]
ahaṁ sva-putrān samanuvratena
[aham sva-putraan samanuvratena]
saumya — O gentle one anuśoce — I lament tam — him adhaḥ-patantam — gliding down bhrātre — on his brother’s paretāya — death vidudruhe — revolted against yaḥ — one who niryāpitaḥ — driven out yena — by whom suhṛt — well-wisher sva-puryāḥ — from his own house aham — myself sva-putrān — with his own sons samanu-vratena — accepting the same line of action.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saumyānuśoce tam adhaḥ-patantaṁ
saumya
O gentle one
anuśoce
I lament
tam
him
adhaḥ-patantam
gliding down
bhrātre paretāya vidudruhe yaḥ
bhrātre
on his brother’s
paretāya
death
vidudruhe
revolted against
yaḥ
one who
niryāpito yena suhṛt sva-puryā
niryāpitaḥ
driven out
yena
by whom
suhṛt
well-wisher
sva-puryāḥ
from his own house
ahaṁ sva-putrān samanuvratena
aham
myself
sva-putrān
with his own sons
samanu-vratena
accepting the same line of action.
O gentle one, I simply lament for him [Dhṛtarāṣṭra] who rebelled against his brother after death. By him I was driven out of my own house, although I am his sincere well-wisher, because he accepted the line of action adopted by his own sons.

Vidura did not ask about the welfare of his elder brother because there was no chance of his well-being, only news of his gliding down to hell. Vidura was a sincere well-wisher for Dhṛtarāṣṭra, and he had a thought about him in the corner of his heart. He lamented that Dhṛtarāṣṭra could rebel against the sons of his dead brother Pāṇḍu and that he could drive him (Vidura) out of his own house on the dictation of his crooked sons. In spite of these actions, Vidura never became an enemy of Dhṛtarāṣṭra but continued to be his well-wisher, and at the last stage of Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s life, it was Vidura only who proved to be his real friend. Such is the behavior of a Vaiṣṇava like Vidura: he desires all good, even for his enemies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Uddhava! I lament for Dhṛtarāṣṭra, who will fall to hell. He committed violence against his dead brother by afflicting the Pāṇḍavas, and he drove me, his friend, out of the palace, following the advice of his sons. O Uddhava! I do not ask about the welfare of blind Dhṛtarāṣṭra, but lament for his eventual fall to hell. O Uddhava (saumya)! He committed violence against his dead (paretāya) brother by violence against his brother’s sons, the Pāṇḍavas. He committed violence against me, his living brother, by driving me out of the palace, though I was his well wisher (suhṛt).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.42

↗
సోఽహం హరేర్మర్త్యవిడమ్బనేన ద‍ృశో నృణాం చాలయతో విధాతు: । నాన్యోపలక్ష్య: పదవీం ప్రసాదా- చ్చరామి పశ్యన్ గతవిస్మయోఽత్ర ॥ ౪౨ ॥
so ’haṁ harer martya-viḍambanena
[so ’ham harer martya-vidambanena]
dṛśo nṛṇāṁ cālayato vidhātuḥ
[drisho nrinaam chaalayato vidhaatuh]
nānyopalakṣyaḥ padavīṁ prasādāc
[naanyopalakshyah padaveem prasaadaach]
carāmi paśyan gata-vismayo ’tra
[charaami pashyan gata-vismayo ’tra]
saḥ aham — therefore, I hareḥ — of the Personality of Godhead martya — in this mortal world viḍambanena — without being recognized dṛśaḥ — on sight nṛṇām — of the people in general cālayataḥ — bewildering vidhātuḥ — in order to do it na — not anya — other upalakṣyaḥ — seen by others padavīm — glories prasādāt — by the grace of carāmi — do travel paśyan — by seeing gata-vismayaḥ — without doubt atra — in this matter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’haṁ harer martya-viḍambanena
dṛśo nṛṇāṁ cālayato vidhātuḥ
nānyopalakṣyaḥ padavīṁ prasādāc
saḥ aham
therefore, I
hareḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
carāmi paśyan gata-vismayo ’tra
martya
in this mortal world
viḍambanena
without being recognized
dṛśaḥ
on sight
nṛṇām
of the people in general
cālayataḥ
bewildering
vidhātuḥ
in order to do it
na
not
anya
other
upalakṣyaḥ
seen by others
padavīm
glories
prasādāt
by the grace of
carāmi
do travel
paśyan
by seeing
gata-vismayaḥ
without doubt
atra
in this matter.
I am not astonished at this, having traveled over the world without being seen by others. The activities of the Personality of Godhead, which are like those of a man in this mortal world, are bewildering to others, but I know of His greatness by His grace, and thus I am happy in all respects.

Although he was the brother of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Vidura was completely different. By the grace of Lord Kṛṣṇa, he was not foolish like his brother, and thus his brother’s association could not influence him. Dhṛtarāṣṭra and his materialistic sons wanted to falsely lord it over the world by dint of their own strength. The Lord encouraged them in this, and thus they became more and more bewildered. But Vidura wanted to achieve sincere devotional service of the Lord and therefore became a soul absolutely surrendered to the Absolute Personality of Godhead. He could realize this in the progress of his pilgrim’s journey, and thus he was freed from all doubts. He was not at all sorry to be bereft of his hearth and home because he now had experience that dependence on the mercy of the Lord is a greater freedom than so-called freedom at home. A person should not be in the renounced order of life unless he is firmly convinced of being protected by the Lord. This stage of life is explained in Bhagavad-gītā as abhayaṁ sattva-saṁśuddhiḥ. Every living entity is factually completely dependent on the mercy of the Lord, but unless one is in the pure state of existence, he cannot be established in this position. This stage of dependence is called sattva-saṁśuddhiḥ, or purification of one’s existence. The result of such purification is exhibited in fearlessness. A devotee of the Lord, who is called nārāyaṇa-para, is never afraid of anything because he is always aware of the fact that the Lord protects him in all circumstances. With this conviction, Vidura traveled alone, and he was not seen or recognized by any friend or foe. Thus he enjoyed freedom of life without obligation to the many duties of the world.

When Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was personally present in the mortal world in His eternal, blissful form of Śyāmasundara, those who were not pure devotees of the Lord could not recognize Him or know His glories. Avajānānti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam ( Bg. 9.11 ): He is always bewildering to the nondevotees, but He is always seen by the devotees by dint of their pure devotional service to Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By the mercy of the Lord, being able to see the lotus feet of the Lord who is hidden from the vision of ordinary men by cheating men like Dhṛtarāṣṭra, I wander to the holy places without doubts. But his violence towards me did not harm me. Rather it was beneficial for me. By the Lord’s mercy, I have seen the feet of the Lord who hides from the intellectual faculties (dṛṣaḥ) of materialistic men by cheating persons such as Dhṛtarāṣṭra. The Lord, affectionate to his devotee, is astonishing in this way! Free from doubt, I wander to all the holy places (atra) unrecognized by others, since I do not reveal this secret about the Lord to anyone. The Lord, revealing himself to Vidura who was drowning in an ocean of grief when he was driven out of the palace by Duryodhana, spoke to him. “O Vidura, my greatest devotee! Are you lamenting because of separation from me? Having given my promise to you now, you will see me wherever you travel, since I will go there before you.” This is the blessing of the Lord. Even after the death of Duryodhana, when Yudhiṣṭhira gains the kingdom, Vidura was without effort able to see the Lord with great bliss, whereas for others great effort was needed to see the Lord. However, with the Lord’s final disappearance, he would be withdrawn from the vision of Vidura. Therefore until he met Uddhava he was again disturbed because he could not see the Lord.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.43

↗
నూనం నృపాణాం త్రిమదోత్పథానాం మహీం ముహుశ్చాలయతాం చమూభి: । వధాత్ప్రపన్నార్తిజిహీర్షయేశో- ఽప్యుపైక్షతాఘం భగవాన్ కురూణామ్ ॥ ౪౩ ॥
nūnaṁ nṛpāṇāṁ tri-madotpathānāṁ
[noonam nripaanaam tri-madotpathaanaam]
mahīṁ muhuś cālayatāṁ camūbhiḥ
[maheem muhush chaalayataam chamoobhih]
vadhāt prapannārti-jihīrṣayeśo
[vadhaat prapannaarti-jiheershayesho]
’py upaikṣatāghaṁ bhagavān kurūṇām
[’py upaikshataagham bhagavaan kuroonaam]
nūnam — of course nṛpāṇām — of the kings tri — three mada-utpathānām — going astray out of false pride mahīm — earth muhuḥ — constantly cālayatām — agitating camūbhiḥ — by movement of soldiers vadhāt — from the act of killing prapanna — surrendered ārti-jihīrṣaya — willing to relieve the distress of the sufferers īśaḥ — the Lord api — in spite of upaikṣata — waited agham — offenses bhagavān — the Supreme Lord kurūṇām — of the Kurus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nūnaṁ nṛpāṇāṁ tri-madotpathānāṁ
nūnam
of course
nṛpāṇām
of the kings
tri
three
mada-utpathānām
going astray out of false pride
mahīṁ muhuś cālayatāṁ camūbhiḥ
mahīm
earth
muhuḥ
constantly
cālayatām
agitating
camūbhiḥ
by movement of soldiers
vadhāt prapannārti-jihīrṣayeśo
vadhāt
from the act of killing
prapanna
surrendered
ārti-jihīrṣaya
willing to relieve the distress of the sufferers
īśaḥ
the Lord
api
in spite of
’py upaikṣatāghaṁ bhagavān kurūṇām
upaikṣata
waited
agham
offenses
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
kurūṇām
of the Kurus.
Despite His being the Lord and being always willing to relieve the distress of sufferers, He [Kṛṣṇa] refrained from killing the Kurus, although they committed all sorts of sins and although He saw other kings constantly agitating the earth by their strong military movements carried out under the dictation of three kinds of false pride.

As declared in Bhagavad-gītā, the Lord appears in the mortal world to execute His much-needed mission of killing the miscreants and giving protection to the suffering faithful. In spite of that mission, Lord Kṛṣṇa tolerated the insult to Draupadī by the Kurus and the injustices perpetrated against the Pāṇḍavas, as well as insults to Himself. The question may be raised, “Why did He tolerate such injustices and insults in His presence? Why did He not chastise the Kurus immediately?” When Draupadī was insulted in the assembly by the Kurus by their attempt to see her naked in the presence of all, the Lord protected Draupadī by supplying an unlimited length of clothing. But He did not chastise the insulting party immediately. This silence of the Lord did not mean, however, that He excused the offenses of the Kurus. There were many other kings on earth who had become very proud of three kinds of possessions — wealth, education and followers — and they were constantly agitating the earth by movements of military strength. The Lord was just waiting to get them together on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra and kill them all at one time, just to make a shortcut in His killing mission. Godless kings or heads of state, when puffed up by advancement of material wealth, education and increase of population, always make a show of military strength and give trouble to the innocent. When Lord Kṛṣṇa was personally present, there were many such kings all over the world, and He thus arranged for the Battle of Kurukṣetra. In His manifestation of viśva-rūpa, the Lord expressed His mission of killing as follows: “I have willingly descended to the earth in My capacity of inexorable Time in order to decrease the unwanted population. I shall finish all those who have assembled here except you, the Pāṇḍavas. This killing does not wait for you to take part in it. It is already arranged: all will be killed by Me. If you want to become famous as the hero of the battlefield and thus enjoy the booty of war, then, O Savyasācī, just become the immediate cause of this killing and thus take the credit. I have already killed all the great warriors — Bhīṣma, Droṇa, Jayadratha, Karṇa and many other great generals. Do not worry. Fight the battle and be famous as a great hero.” (Bg. 11.32-34)

The Lord always wants to see His devotee as the hero of some episode which He Himself performs. He wanted to see His devotee and friend Arjuna as the hero of the Battle of Kurukṣetra, and thus He waited for all the miscreants of the world to assemble. That, and nothing else, is the explanation of His waiting.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though the Lord could have immediately killed all the kings intoxicated with pride in wealth, education and birth who constantly disturbed the earth with their armies, in order to relieve the devotees’ suffering, he tolerated the offenses of the Kurus. Is it pleasing to the Lord that his devotees were exiled to the forest? And when the Lord became a messenger, Duryodhana and others tried to capture Kṛṣṇa, but was defeated. Because of this offense, they were later killed. The Lord did not overlook their offense. Desiring to destroy the suffering of his devotees by killing kings bewildered by pride in wealth, knowledge and birth, thought the Lord was capable of king them all as soon as they committed offense, he tolerated the sins of the Kurus. Killing them at once would not vanquish all the evil rulers. vidyāmado dhana-madas tatahivābhijano madaḥ ete madā madāndhānāṁ ta eve hi satāṁ damā Those who are blind with pride have pride in education, pride in wealth and pride in birth. These persons are avoided by the wise. Mahābhārata 5.34.421
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.44

↗
అజస్య జన్మోత్పథనాశనాయ కర్మాణ్యకర్తుర్గ్రహణాయ పుంసామ్ । నన్వన్యథా కోఽర్హతి దేహయోగం పరో గుణానాముత కర్మతన్త్రమ్ ॥ ౪౪ ॥
ajasya janmotpatha-nāśanāya
[ajasya janmotpatha-naashanaaya]
karmāṇy akartur grahaṇāya puṁsām
[karmaany akartur grahanaaya pumsaam]
nanv anyathā ko ’rhati deha-yogaṁ
[nanv anyathaa ko ’rhati deha-yogam]
paro guṇānām uta karma-tantram
[paro gunaanaam uta karma-tantram]
ajasya — of the unborn janma — appearance utpatha-nāśanāya — for the sake of annihilating the upstarts karmāṇi — works akartuḥ — of one who has nothing to do grahaṇāya — to take up puṁsām — of all persons nanu anyathā — otherwise kaḥ — who arhati — may deserve deha-yogam — contact of the body paraḥ — transcendental guṇānām — of the three modes of nature uta — what to speak of karma-tantram — the law of action and reaction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ajasya janmotpatha-nāśanāya
ajasya
of the unborn
janma
appearance
karmāṇy akartur grahaṇāya puṁsām
nanv anyathā ko ’rhati deha-yogaṁ
paro guṇānām uta karma-tantram
utpatha-nāśanāya
for the sake of annihilating the upstarts
karmāṇi
works
akartuḥ
of one who has nothing to do
grahaṇāya
to take up
puṁsām
of all persons
nanu anyathā
otherwise
kaḥ
who
arhati
may deserve
deha-yogam
contact of the body
paraḥ
transcendental
guṇānām
of the three modes of nature
uta
what to speak of
karma-tantram
the law of action and reaction.
The appearance of the Lord is manifested for the annihilation of the upstarts. His activities are transcendental and are enacted for the understanding of all persons. Otherwise, since the Lord is transcendental to all material modes, what purpose could He serve by coming to earth?

Īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ ( Brahma-saṁhitā 5.1 ): the form of the Lord is eternal, blissful and all-satisfying. His so-called birth is therefore an appearance only, like the birth of the sun on the horizon. His birth does not, like that of the living entities, take place under the influence of material nature and the bondage of the reactions of past deeds. His works and activities are independent pastimes and are not subject to the reactions of material nature. In Bhagavad-gītā (4.14) it is said:

na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti na me karma-phale spṛhā iti māṁ yo ’bhijānāti karmabhir na sa badhyate

The law of karma enacted by the Supreme Lord for the living entities cannot be applicable to Him, nor has the Lord any desire to improve Himself by activities like those of ordinary living beings. Ordinary living beings work for the improvement of their conditional lives. But the Lord is already full of all opulence, all strength, all fame, all beauty, all knowledge and all renunciation. Why should He desire improvement? No one can excel Him in any opulence, and therefore the desire for improvement is absolutely useless for Him. One should always discriminate between the activities of the Lord and those of ordinary living beings. Thus one may come to the right conclusion regarding the Lord’s transcendental position. One who can come to the conclusion of the Lord’s transcendence can become a devotee of the Lord and can at once be free from all reactions of past deeds. It is said, karmāṇi nirdahati kintu ca bhakti-bhājām: the Lord minimizes or nullifies the reactionary influence of the devotee’s past deeds. ( Brahma-saṁhitā 5.54 )

The activities of the Lord are to be accepted and relished by all living entities. His activities are to attract the ordinary man towards the Lord. The Lord always acts in favor of the devotees, and therefore ordinary men who are fruitive actors or seekers of salvation may be attracted to the Lord when He acts as protector of the devotees. The fruitive actors can attain their goals by devotional service, and the salvationists can also attain their goal in life by devotional service to the Lord. The devotees do not want the fruitive results of their work, nor do they want any kind of salvation. They relish the glorious superhuman activities of the Lord, such as His lifting Govardhana Hill and His killing the demon Pūtanā in infancy. His activities are enacted to attract all kinds of men — karmīs, jṣānīs and bhaktas. Because He is transcendental to all laws of karma, there is no possibility of His accepting a form of māyā as is forced on the ordinary living entities who are bound by the actions and reactions of their own deeds.

The secondary purpose of His appearance is to annihilate the upstart asuras and to stop the nonsense of atheistic propaganda by less intelligent persons. By the Lord’s causeless mercy, the asuras who are killed personally by the Personality of Godhead get salvation. The meaningful appearance of the Lord is always distinct from ordinary birth. Even the pure devotees have no connection with the material body, and certainly the Lord, who appears as He is, in His sac-cid-ānanda form, is not limited by a material form.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though the Lord is without birth, he appeared in this world to destroy the wicked. Though without action, the Lord performed actions to attract his devotees. On the other hand the jīvas of this word are dependent on karma and rebirth. How can one who is beyond the guṇas take a body and perform material actions? “Why should the Supreme Lord full of knowledge and bliss involve himself in the material world of sin and piety?” That is true. The Lord appears in this world for two reasons: affection for his devotee and desiring the good of all other beings. This is what the verse explains. The Lord is devoid of transformations such as birth caused by dependence on māyā, which is the condition of ordinary jīvas. But he takes birth, through yoga-māyā, because of dependence on his devotees’ prema, for destroying the demons who stray from the correct path (utpatha). By killing them he gives them liberation. Though he is not the doer, and does not performs material actions, he performs actions full of knowledge and bliss such as lifting Govardhana, without being the performer of action, which causes bondage in the guṇas. He performs these actions for the pleasure of his devotees (puṁsām) who are detached from the happiness of Svarga or liberation. Or he performs these actions for attracting the people to himself, for attracting the people of the material world, those desiring liberation and those who are already liberated. nivṛtta-tarṣair upagīyamānād bhavauṣadhāc chrotra-mano-’bhirāmāt ka uttamaśloka-guṇānuvādāt pumān virajyeta vinā paśughnāt Glorification of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is performed in the paramparā system; that is, it is conveyed from spiritual master to disciple. Such glorification is relished by those no longer interested in the false, temporary glorification of this cosmic manifestation. Descriptions of the Lord are the right medicine for the conditioned soul undergoing repeated birth and death. Therefore, who will cease hearing such glorification of the Lord except a butcher or one who is killing his own self? SB 10.1.4 On the other hand the jīvas are dependent on their karmas. The Lord is not like that. If the Lord received birth and actions by karma, he would have a relationship with a material body and be dependent on karma. But even his devotee perfect in bhakti, beyond the guṇas, does not have a relationship with a material body, what to speak of the Supreme Lord himself. What jīva, separate from the guṇas, would be dependent on karma (deha-yogam)? No one. Thus the meaning is that he has a relationship with a body not dependent on karma. Because there is no possibility that the Lord can be connected with māyā, it is concluded that his body is knowledge and bliss.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3.1.45

↗
తస్య ప్రపన్నాఖిలలోకపానా- మవస్థితానామనుశాసనే స్వే । అర్థాయ జాతస్య యదుష్వజస్య వార్తాం సఖే కీర్తయ తీర్థకీర్తే: ॥ ౪౫ ॥
tasya prapannākhila-lokapānām
[tasya prapannaakhila-lokapaanaam]
avasthitānām anuśāsane sve
[avasthitaanaam anushaasane sve]
arthāya jātasya yaduṣv ajasya
[arthaaya jaatasya yadushv ajasya]
vārtāṁ sakhe kīrtaya tīrtha-kīrteḥ
[vaartaam sakhe keertaya teertha-keerteh]
tasya — His prapanna — surrendered akhila-loka-pānām — all rulers of the entire universe avasthitānām — situated in anuśāsane — under the control of sve — own self arthāya — for the interest of jātasya — of the born yaduṣu — in the family of the Yadus ajasya — of the unborn vārtām — topics sakhe — O my friend kīrtaya — please narrate tīrtha-kīrteḥ — of the Lord, whose glories are chanted in the places of pilgrimage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya prapannākhila-lokapānām
tasya
His
prapanna
surrendered
akhila-loka-pānām
all rulers of the entire universe
avasthitānām anuśāsane sve
avasthitānām
situated in
anuśāsane
under the control of
sve
own self
arthāya jātasya yaduṣv ajasya
arthāya
for the interest of
jātasya
of the born
yaduṣu
in the family of the Yadus
ajasya
of the unborn
vārtāṁ sakhe kīrtaya tīrtha-kīrteḥ
vārtām
topics
sakhe
O my friend
kīrtaya
please narrate
tīrtha-kīrteḥ
of the Lord, whose glories are chanted in the places of pilgrimage.
O my friend, please, therefore, chant the glories of the Lord, who is meant to be glorified in the places of pilgrimage. He is unborn, and yet He appears by His causeless mercy upon the surrendered rulers of all parts of the universe. Only for their interest did He appear in the family of His unalloyed devotees the Yadus.

There are innumerable rulers all over the universe in different varieties of planets: the sun-god in the sun planet, the moon-god in the moon planet, Indra in the heavenly planet, Vāyu, Varuṇa, and those in the Brahmaloka planet, where Lord Brahmā is living. All are obedient servants of the Lord. Whenever there is any trouble in the administration of the innumerable planets in different universes, the rulers pray for an appearance, and the Lord appears. The Bhāgavatam (1.3.28) has already confirmed this in the following verse:

ete cāṁśa-kalāḥ puṁsaḥ kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam indrāri-vyākulaṁ lokaṁ mṛḍayanti yuge yuge

In every millennium, whenever there is any trouble for the obedient rulers, the Lord appears. He also appears for the sake of His pure unalloyed devotees. The surrendered rulers and the pure devotees are always strictly under the control of the Lord, and they are never disobedient to the desires of the Lord. The Lord is therefore always attentive to them.

The purpose of pilgrimages is to remember the Lord constantly, and therefore the Lord is known as tīrtha-kīrti. The purpose of going to a place of pilgrimage is to get the chance to glorify the Lord. Even today, although times have changed, there are still pilgrimage sites in India. For example, in Mathurā and Vṛndāvana, where we had a chance to stay, people are awake from early in the morning at 4 A.M. up until nighttime and are constantly engaged, some way or other, in chanting the holy glories of the Lord. The beauty of such a pilgrimage site is that automatically one remembers the holy glories of the Lord. His name, fame, quality, form, pastimes and entourage are all identical to the Lord, and therefore chanting the glories of the Lord invokes the personal presence of the Lord. Any time or anywhere pure devotees meet and chant the glories of the Lord, the Lord is present without any doubt. It is said by the Lord Himself that He always stays where His pure devotees chant His glories.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Third Canto, First Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Questions by Vidura.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O friend! Though the Lord is without birth, he appears in the Yadu dynasty for his pure devotees who follow his instructions and for surrendered kings. Please describe the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa, famous as the best place of pilgrimage. Please speak about the birth and activities of the Lord who is full of knowledge and bliss. Speak the pastimes of the Lord who is famous as a holy place (tīrtha-kīrteḥ) which can purify everyone and deliver them from saṁsāra, for the benefit of those kings surrendered to the Lord and for others who follow his orders. I have bathed in almost all the holy places. Now bathe me in the nectar of famous place called Kṛṣṇa, which will make all the other holy places successful. Thus ends the commentary on First Chapter of the Third Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Two Uddhava Remembers Kṛṣṇa
📝 My note