FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

9.6 · The Downfall of Saubhari Muni

48 verses
R Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (19158 chars)

R – Ramacandra (6-13) The most famous king in the Surya dynasty was Lord Ramacandra, who was ideal in all respects – as a king, as a son, as a husband and as a disciple. His glorious pastimes are recounted in the Ramayana, which has been recited for generations. Srimad-Bhagavatam summarises those extraordinary narrations: the alliance with Hanuman and the monkey army, the building of a bridge to Lanka, the rescue of Sitadevi from the clutches of Ravana, and the establishment of Rama-rajya (Rama’s ideal rulership), where every citizen had their material and spiritual needs perfectly catered for.

Previous Succession Next Saubhari Muni Last updated 1 year ago

R – Ramacandra (6-13)

R – Ramacandra (6-13) The most famous king in the Surya dynasty was Lord Ramacandra, who was ideal in all respects – as a king, as a son, as a husband and as a disciple. His glorious pastimes are recounted in the Ramayana, which has been recited for generations. Srimad-Bhagavatam summarises those extraordinary narrations: the alliance with Hanuman and the monkey army, the building of a bridge to Lanka, the rescue of Sitadevi from the clutches of Ravana, and the establishment of Rama-rajya (Rama’s ideal rulership), where every citizen had their material and spiritual needs perfectly catered for.

Previous Succession Next Saubhari Muni Last updated 1 year ago

Dynasties of Iksvaku

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Dynasties of Iksvaku Chapter 12, 13 Sukadeva Goswami then described the dynasty of Kusa, Lord Rama’s son. He also elaborated on the dynasty of Nimi, who was another of Iksvaku’s sons. When Nimi wanted to perform a sacrifice, he requested the presence of his spiritual master, Vasistha. Since Vasistha was engaged elsewhere, he instructed Nimi to wait for him to return. Nimi, however, considered that life was very short, so he went ahead anyway. When Vasistha discovered this, he cursed his disciple to die. Nimi then counter-cursed his spiritual master to suffer the same fate! Vasistha took birth again, but when the priests tried to revive Nimi he refused, not wanting to be materially encaged again. Instead, the sages churned Nimi’s body, and as a result, Janaka, father of Udavasu, was born. Sukadeva Goswami then described the rest of the dynasty.

Previous Ramacandra’s Reign Next Purusottama Last updated 1 year ago

Other Descendants

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Other Descendants Chapter 7, 8, 9 Sukadeva Goswami listed more descendants of King Mandhata, again pausing to elaborate on certain personalities. Trisanku : Several generations after Mandhata came Trisanku, who kidnapped a lady who was soon to be married. For this act, his father angrily cursed him to become a dog-eater ( candala ). With Visvamitra’s help, however, Trisanku received elevation to the heavenly planets. Later, the demigods forced him to fall, and he thus began his descent, though Visvamitra’s powerful intervention meant he didn’t drop all the way down. Hariscandra : After successfully worshipping Varuna to get a son, Hariscandra, Trisanku’s son, repeatedly avoided his promise to offer the son as a sacrifice in return. Hariscandra was then attacked by disease, though his son, Rohita, resolved the whole situation by purchasing another boy and offering him for the Varuna-yajna. Hariscandra was freed from his disease and ultimately freed from the entanglement of material life. Bahuka : In the lineage of Rohita was Bahuka, who had adopted residence in the forest and eventually died there. Though his wife wanted to enter the funeral pyre with him, the sage Aurva forbade her since she was pregnant. The co-wives of Bahuka tried to poison her, but she nevertheless had a son named Sagara (“one born with poison”). Sagara : Under his rulership many uncivilised clans were reformed. When he attempted to perform a horse sacrifice ( asvamedha yajna ), Indra stole the horse, and Sagara’s sons went looking for it. They dug up the earth and formed a trench which became known as the Sagara ocean. When they falsely accused Kapiladeva of stealing the horse, their offensive allegations caused them to be burned to ashes. Amsuman : This grandson of Sagara was instructed in spiritual knowledge by Lord Kapiladeva and later retrieved the horse. Sagara then performed the sacrifices with that horse. Both Amsuman and Dilipa, his son, were unsuccessful in bringing the Ganges to the Earth. Bhagiratha : Dilipa’s son underwent severe austerities to invite Ganga to the earth. When Gangadevi appeared, he humbly submitted his request. She agreed, but had some reservations. Bhagiratha mitigated them by convincing Siva to bear the force of her descent, and by arranging that pure devotees who enter the Ganga would remove all the stored sins of materialistic bathers. Later, the sons of Sagara, whose bodies had been burnt up, were elevated by being sprinkled with Ganges water. Saudasa : In Bhagiratha’s line was Saudasa, who once killed a man-eater. Seeking revenge, the man-eater’s brother became the cook at Saudasa’s palace and served meat to Vasistha, the spiritual master of the King. Vasistha thus cursed Saudasa to become a man-eater, and in that life he indeed killed a brahmana who was about to impregnate his wife. Saudasa was thus cursed to die if he ever engaged in the sexual act. After being released from the Raksasa curse, he still couldn’t impregnate his wife, Madayanti, and thus allowed Vasistha Muni to give her a child. Khatvanga : Further in the lineage came the great King Khatvanga. When he pleased the demigods by assisting them to defeat the demons, they offered him a benediction. He wisely enquired how long he would live for, and when he discovered he was on the brink of death, he fixed his mind on the Lord and attained perfection.

Previous Saubhari Muni Next Ramacandra’s Pastimes Last updated 1 year ago

Purusottama

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama “We should not accept any rascal as God or an incarnation of God, for God displays special features in His various activities. Therefore, the Lord Himself says in Bhagavad-gita ( 4.9 ): “One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna.” The activities of the Lord are not common; they are all transcendentally wonderful and not able to be performed by any other living being. The symptoms of the Lord’s activities are all mentioned in the sastras, and after one understands them one can accept the Lord as He is.” ( SB 9.10.15 ) To prove His Supreme identity, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu exhibited His six-armed form known as the Sadbhuja-rupa on multiple occasions. The form displays the two arms of Rama (holding the bow and arrow), the two arms of Krishna (holding the flute) and the two arms of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (holding the staff and waterpot). The Supreme Person (Purusottama) thus assumes different identities, each with a specific purpose and mood. Krishna is known as Lila-Purusottama – the form of the Lord who attracts the world by displaying profoundly sweet and intimate pastimes with His devotees. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is known as Prema-Purusottama - the form of the Lord who embodies and freely distributes the wonderful gift of pure love of Godhead to the entire world. Ramacandra is known as Maryada-Purusottama – the form of the Lord who establishes the ideal example for the world to follow. He was the ideal person, the ideal husband, the ideal ruler and the ideal follower of Vedic culture and etiquette in all respects. In Canto Eleven, Narada Muni recites an exquisite verse which depicts the Sadbhuja-rupa. When translated in different ways, the Sanskrit text simultaneously describes Lord Rama, Lord Krishna and Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu: tyaktva su-dustyaja-surepsita-rajya-laksmim dharmistha arya-vacasa yad agad aranyam maya-mrgam dayitayepsitam anvadhavad vande maha-purusa te caranaravindam ( SB 11.5.34 ) Lord Krishna – “O Maha Purusa, you gave up the opulence of Mathura which is desired even by demigods. To obey the loving order of Vasudeva and Devaki, You went to the forest village of Vrindavana. Due to the inconceivable love of Srimati Radharani, You become easily controlled by Her just like ‘a toy animal.’ You run here and there in Vrindavana, protecting the cows, playing with your friends and engaging in countless intrigues of love with Srimati Radharani and the gopis, tightly under the control of their love.” Lord Chaitanya – “O Maha Purusa, I worship Your lotus feet. You accepted sannyasa and gave up the association of the goddess of fortune and all her opulence, which is most difficult to renounce and is hankered after by even the great demigods. Being the most faithful follower of the path of religion, You thus left for the forest in obedience to a brahmana’s curse. Out of sheer mercifulness You chased after the fallen conditioned souls, who are always in pursuit of the false enjoyment of illusion, and at the same time engaged in searching out Your own desired object, Lord Syamasundara.” Lord Ramacandra – “O Maha Purusa, you gave up the Kingdom of Ayodhya, which was very opulent, difficult to renounce and hankered after by even great demigods. By the order of Maharaja Dasaratha, who was just like Your guru, You gave up everything and went to the forest. There You exhibited Your great affection for mother Sita and chased after the golden deer, which was especially desired by Srimati Sitadevi.” Rama demonstrated how to live according to dharma : right action or sacred duty according to one’s occupation and social situation. Indeed, His entire life was a demonstration of selflessness, nobility of spirit and being prepared to sacrifice one’s own comfort for a higher cause.

Previous Dynasties of Iksvaku Next Being Exemplary Last updated 1 year ago

Banishing Sita

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama Banishing Sita Perhaps the most bewildering of Rama’s acts was to banish Sita after rescuing her from the grips of Ravana. If Lord Rama’s descent was to set the ideal example, how do we justify such a (seemingly) harsh, cruel and immoral act? Sitadevi was pure, chaste, untouched and completely innocent, and to exile her because of nonsensical rumours seems unforgivable. In order to understand this, we have to look at the practical reality, the principle involved and the deeper purpose of the Lord. [ 28 ] Practical – Sitadevi wasn’t cruelly exiled with no means of survival, but rather given a suitable living situation where she would be fully protected. She was carefully placed under the care of Valmiki Rishi and female hermits within the kingdom of Ayodhya. But why was she banished from the palace? Principle – while navigating life we are often confronted with a conflict of principles. It’s an art to expertly respond and resolve such dilemmas. As an ideal husband, Ramacandra had a duty to care for His chaste wife. As a king, Ramacandra had the responsibility of being spotless and free from any suspicion or character flaw. He expertly balanced both principles by ensuring Sita’s protection, and simultaneously exhibiting the detachment required of a king, thus setting the shining example for all future leaders. But why did the innocent Sita have to suffer? Purpose – the profound purpose and inner meaning behind this episode is to facilitate and intensify the exchange of spiritual emotions between the Lord and His consort. Love is intensified in separation. We find this in the pastimes of Krishna, in the pastimes of Sri Chaitanya and here in the pastimes of Lord Rama. What externally looks like a hard-hearted act, is actually a trigger for invoking a deep, sweet internal yearning. The entire incident also highlights the incredible love of Sita, which was unfailing in all circumstances. Despite being rejected by her beloved, her faithfulness remained as strong as ever – love tested is love triumphant.

Previous Being Exemplary Next A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Last updated 1 year ago

Being Exemplary

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama Being Exemplary Lord Rama’s life is detailed in the ancient Sanskrit epic, Ramayana. The history contains 24,000 verses, and fully describes the activities of Lord Rama and the lessons relevant for our lives today. The story is told in response to sage Valmiki’s question to Narada Muni: “Who is an ideal man?” Narada’s answer, a brief description of the life and qualities of Lord Rama, forms the basis for Valmiki’s much longer epic. This beautiful teaching of being ideal and exemplary is central to the development of spirituality. When Srila Prabhupada was once asked, “How do you recognise a Vaisnava?” his answer was simple but profound: “A Vaisnava is a perfect gentleman.” Just as the Srimad-Bhagavatam is known as amala-purana , the spotless book, the true follower is known as amala-bhakta , the spotless devotee. One famous propagandist used to say that you can cheat some people for all time and you can cheat all people for some time, but you can’t cheat all people for all time. If one is lacking in integrity and character, sooner or later it will be exposed. In the material world, people are remembered for what they do – their ground-breaking achievements, their high-ranking positions of responsibility and their impactful influence on the world. In spiritual circles, however, people are remembered for who they are . In some cases, the most outstanding spiritualists made a visible mark on the world and were famed for it, but in many cases they were quiet, simple, humble souls who went about their daily life with a deep sense of devotion, sensitivity and saintliness, their consciousness merged in transcendence. They were unassuming, and quite often went unnoticed. The value system in spiritual circles is entirely different: it’s character over capability. The spotless and exemplary character of saintly personalities is an unending source of instruction and inspiration. They are never found to be duplicitous or superficial, but ever-preaching the highest ideals of human life and simultaneously walking the talk. A recent survey showed that over 70% of first- time attendants to a spiritual movement never return. Why? Primarily because they observe a huge gap between the ideals of the philosophy and the behaviour of its adherents. Thus, we may consider that being exemplary in conduct is a core aspect of any aspiring spiritualist’s life, and indeed a very special contribution to the world. Being exemplary is a service which is universal (everyone can do it), powerful (everyone will appreciate it), perpetual (can never be taken away by anyone) and flexible (can be done in any time, place or circumstance).

Previous Purusottama Next Banishing Sita Last updated 1 year ago

Ramacandra’s Pastimes

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Ramacandra’s Pastimes Chapter 10 Sukadeva Goswami’s description of Iksvaku’s dynasty eventually reached Dasaratha, the father of Lord Rama. The great sage then narrated all the key events in Lord Rama’s life. On the request of Visvamitra, Rama assisted in killing many demons even though He was still relatively young. Later, He won the hand of Sita in Mithila, doing what no other warrior could do. During the return journey, Ramacandra defeated the mighty Parasurama, who had annihilated the ksatriya race. Back in Ayodhya, everything was very auspicious, until the news arrived that Dasaratha had been asked to banish Rama from the kingdom. To honour his father, Rama readily agreed and left all opulence behind to accept a life of hardship in the forest. While wandering in exile, Rama, Sita and Laksman encountered a variety of situations. When Ravana’s sister, Surpanakha, approached Rama with lusty desires, Laksman cut her nose off. This led to the killing of Khara and Dusana who had launched an attack in retaliation. Later, the tragic kidnapping of Sita took place, and the bravery of Jatayu was witnessed as he attempted to intercept the mighty Ravana, though he lost his life in the process. To rescue his beloved consort, Rama established an alliance with the monkeys, who expertly tracked her down. In an epic scene, Rama and the monkey army built a bridge to Lanka and laid siege on the demons who had kidnapped the goddess of fortune. After a raging battle, Ravana was defeated and killed, and Sita was rescued from the Asoka grove. Rama installed the devoted Vibhisana as King of Lanka, while He himself returned to Ayodhya accompanied by His dearest associates. Bharata, who had been ruling in His absence, heartily welcomed Rama, who was finally reunited with his mothers, family members and loyal subjects. Rama was duly coronated as the King, and His reign was celebrated as the ideal exhibition of royal rule ( rama-rajya ).

Previous Other Descendants Next Ramacandra’s Reign Last updated 1 year ago

Ramacandra’s Reign

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Ramacandra’s Reign Chapter 11 Ramacandra conducted His affairs with the highest principles, and thus there was incredible opulence and abundant prosperity in the kingdom. He would give personal time to the citizens and ensure all governmental affairs were concluded smoothly. Ramacandra would send spies around the capital and wander incognito Himself to gauge the impression the citizens had of Him. He wanted this feedback in order to maintain the love and trust of His subjects. One night, He heard a man criticising Him for accepting Sitadevi back after she had been in another man’s house. Fearing the concerns and doubts that people may have about his character, He decided to leave His pregnant wife. Everyone was shocked and distraught! Sitadevi took shelter of Valmiki’s asrama , where she gave birth to Lava and Kusa. When Sitadevi eventually left the world, the aggrieved Rama performed austerities for 13,000 years. The Supreme Lord then wound up His pastimes and left the world.

Previous Ramacandra’s Pastimes Next Dynasties of Iksvaku Last updated 1 year ago

Saubhari Muni

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Saubhari Muni Chapter 6 Sukadeva Goswami described the descendants of Ambarish and then detailed the descendants of Iksvaku (another of Vaivasvata Manu’s sons) up to Mandhata, whose unique birth and powerful rulership was described. Mandhata’s fifty daughters were all married to Saubhari Muni, and Sukadeva Goswami thus narrated the sage’s history. Once, while meditating in the waters of the Yamuna, Saubhari witnessed two fishes copulating. He became so sexually agitated that he desired to marry one of Mandhata’s daughters. He rejuvenated his body, after which all fifty daughters selected him as their husband. By dint of yogic power, the former ascetic provided all household opulence for his wives, had 100 children with each one and thus expanded his family network. He later reflected on how ephemeral sense gratification is, and how he had become entangled in a very mundane existence. Having reawakened his spiritual intelligence, he retired from family life ( vanaprastha ), practised austerities and subsequently attained perfection.

Previous R – Ramacandra (6-13) Next Other Descendants Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ విరూప: కేతుమాఞ్ఛమ్భురమ్బరీషసుతాస్త్రయ: । విరూపాత్ పృషదశ్వోఽభూత్తత్ పుత్రస్తు రథీతర: ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
virūpaḥ ketumāṣ chambhur
[viroopah ketumaash chambhur]
ambarīṣa-sutās trayaḥ
[ambareesha-sutaas trayah]
virūpāt pṛṣadaśvo ’bhūt
[viroopaat prishadashvo ’bhoot]
tat-putras tu rathītaraḥ
[tat-putras tu ratheetarah]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said virūpaḥ — by the name Virūpa ketumān — by the name Ketumān śambhuḥ — by the name Śambhu ambarīṣa — of Ambarīṣa Mahārāja sutāḥ trayaḥ — the three sons virūpāt — from Virūpa pṛṣadaśvaḥ — of the name Pṛṣadaśva abhūt — there was tat-putraḥ — his son tu — and rathītaraḥ — of the name Rathītara.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
virūpaḥ ketumāṣ chambhur
virūpaḥ
by the name Virūpa
ketumān
by the name Ketumān
ambarīṣa-sutās trayaḥ
śambhuḥ
by the name Śambhu
ambarīṣa
of Ambarīṣa Mahārāja
sutāḥ trayaḥ
the three sons
virūpāt pṛṣadaśvo ’bhūt
virūpāt
from Virūpa
pṛṣadaśvaḥ
of the name Pṛṣadaśva
abhūt
there was
tat-putras tu rathītaraḥ
tat-putraḥ
his son
tu
and
rathītaraḥ
of the name Rathītara.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, Ambarīṣa had three sons, named Virūpa, Ketumān and Śambhu. From Virūpa came a son named Pṛṣadaśva, and from Pṛṣadaśva came a son named Rathītara.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Ambarīṣa had three sons, named Virūpa, Ketumān and Śambhu. From Virūpa came a son named Pṛṣadaśva, and from Pṛṣadaśva came a son named Rathītara. The Sixth Chapter tells the stories of Śaśāda, Indravāha, Yuvanāśva, Māndhātā and the astonishing story of the sage Saubhari.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.2

↗
రథీతరస్యాప్రజస్య భార్యాయాం తన్తవేఽర్థిత: । అఙ్గిరా జనయామాస బ్రహ్మవర్చస్విన: సుతాన్ ॥ ౨ ॥
rathītarasyāprajasya
[ratheetarasyaaprajasya]
bhāryāyāṁ tantave ’rthitaḥ
[bhaaryaayaam tantave ’rthitah]
aṅgirā janayām āsa
[angiraa janayaam aasa]
brahma-varcasvinaḥ sutān
[brahma-varchasvinah sutaan]
rathītarasya — of Rathītara aprajasya — who had no sons bhāryāyām — unto his wife tantave — for increasing offspring arthitaḥ — being requested aṅgirāḥ — the great sage Aṅgirā janayām āsa — caused to take birth brahma-varcasvinaḥ — who had brahminical qualities sutān — sons.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rathītarasyāprajasya
rathītarasya
of Rathītara
aprajasya
who had no sons
bhāryāyāṁ tantave ’rthitaḥ
bhāryāyām
unto his wife
tantave
for increasing offspring
aṅgirā janayām āsa
brahma-varcasvinaḥ sutān
arthitaḥ
being requested
aṅgirāḥ
the great sage Aṅgirā
janayām āsa
caused to take birth
brahma-varcasvinaḥ
who had brahminical qualities
sutān
sons.
Rathītara had no sons, and therefore he requested the great sage Aṅgirā to beget sons for him. Because of this request, Aṅgirā begot sons in the womb of Rathītara’s wife. All these sons were born with brahminical prowess.

In the Vedic age a man was sometimes called upon to beget sons in the womb of a lesser man’s wife for the sake of better progeny. In such an instance, the woman is compared to an agricultural field. A person possessing an agricultural field may employ another person to produce food grains from it, but because the grains are produced from the land, they are considered the property of the owner of the land. Similarly, a woman was sometimes allowed to be impregnated by someone other than her husband, but the sons born of her would then become her husband’s sons. Such sons were called kṣetra-jāta. Because Rathītara had no sons, he took advantage of this method.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rathītara had no sons, and therefore he requested the great sage Aṅgirā to beget sons for him. Because of this request, Aṅgirā begot sons with brahminical prowess in the womb of Rathītara's wife. Tantave means “for producing children.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.3

↗
ఏతే క్షేత్రప్రసూతా వై పునస్త్వాఙ్గిరసా: స్మృతా: । రథీతరాణాం ప్రవరా: క్షేత్రోపేతా ద్విజాతయ: ॥ ౩ ॥
ete kṣetra-prasūtā vai
[ete kshetra-prasootaa vai]
punas tv āṅgirasāḥ smṛtāḥ
[punas tv aangirasaah smritaah]
rathītarāṇāṁ pravarāḥ
[ratheetaraanaam pravaraah]
kṣetropetā dvi-jātayaḥ
[kshetropetaa dvi-jaatayah]
ete — the sons begotten by Aṅgirā kṣetra-prasūtāḥ — became the children of Rathītara and belonged to his family (because they were born from the womb of his wife) vai — indeed punaḥ — again tu — but āṅgirasāḥ — of the dynasty of Aṅgirā smṛtāḥ — they were called rathītarāṇām — of all the sons of Rathītara pravarāḥ — the chief kṣetra-upetāḥ — because of being born of the kṣetra (field) dvi-jātayaḥ — called brāhmaṇa (being a mixture of brāhmaṇa and kṣatriya).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ete kṣetra-prasūtā vai
ete
the sons begotten by Aṅgirā
kṣetra-prasūtāḥ
became the children of Rathītara and belonged to his family (because they were born from the womb of his wife)
vai
indeed
punas tv āṅgirasāḥ smṛtāḥ
punaḥ
again
tu
but
āṅgirasāḥ
of the dynasty of Aṅgirā
smṛtāḥ
they were called
rathītarāṇāṁ pravarāḥ
rathītarāṇām
of all the sons of Rathītara
pravarāḥ
the chief
kṣetropetā dvi-jātayaḥ
kṣetra-upetāḥ
because of being born of the kṣetra (field)
dvi-jātayaḥ
called brāhmaṇa (being a mixture of brāhmaṇa and kṣatriya).
Having been born from the womb of Rathītara’s wife, all these sons were known as the dynasty of Rathītara, but because they were born from the semen of Aṅgirā, they were also known as the dynasty of Aṅgirā. Among all the progeny of Rathītara, these sons were the most prominent because, owing to their birth, they were considered brāhmaṇas.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura gives the meaning of dvi-jātayaḥ as “mixed caste,” indicating a mixture of brāhmaṇa and kṣatriya.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having been born from the womb of Rathītara's wife, all these sons were known as the dynasty of Rathītara, but because they were born from the semen of Aṅgirā, they were also known as the dynasty of Aṅgirā. Among all the progeny of Rathītara’s line, these sons were the most prominent because, owing to their birth, they were considered brāhmaṇas. Because of being born in Rathītara’s wife they were part of Rathītara’s line. Because they were born from Aṅgirā’s semen they were part of his lineage. They were famous as Rathītara’s sons because of being born in his wife, but they were considered brāhmaṇas. They can be described as having two lineages.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.4

↗
క్షువతస్తు మనోర్జజ్ఞే ఇక్ష్వాకుర్ఘ్రాణత: సుత: । తస్య పుత్రశతజ్యేష్ఠా వికుక్షినిమిదణ్డకా: ॥ ౪ ॥
kṣuvatas tu manor jajṣe
[kshuvatas tu manor jajshe]
ikṣvākur ghrāṇataḥ sutaḥ
[ikshvaakur ghraanatah sutah]
tasya putra-śata-jyeṣṭhā
[tasya putra-shata-jyeshthaa]
vikukṣi-nimi-daṇḍakāḥ
[vikukshi-nimi-dandakaah]
kṣuvataḥ — while sneezing tu — but manoḥ — of Manu jajṣe — was born ikṣvākuḥ — by the name Ikṣvāku ghrāṇataḥ — from the nostrils sutaḥ — the son tasya — of Ikṣvāku putra-śata — one hundred sons jyeṣṭhāḥ — prominent vikukṣi — of the name Vikukṣi nimi — by the name Nimi daṇḍakāḥ — by the name Daṇḍakā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣuvatas tu manor jajṣe
kṣuvataḥ
while sneezing
tu
but
manoḥ
of Manu
jajṣe
was born
ikṣvākur ghrāṇataḥ sutaḥ
ikṣvākuḥ
by the name Ikṣvāku
ghrāṇataḥ
from the nostrils
sutaḥ
the son
tasya putra-śata-jyeṣṭhā
tasya
of Ikṣvāku
putra-śata
one hundred sons
jyeṣṭhāḥ
prominent
vikukṣi-nimi-daṇḍakāḥ
vikukṣi
of the name Vikukṣi
nimi
by the name Nimi
daṇḍakāḥ
by the name Daṇḍakā.
The son of Manu was Ikṣvāku. When Manu was sneezing, Ikṣvāku was born from Manu’s nostrils. King Ikṣvāku had one hundred sons, of whom Vikukṣi, Nimi and Daṇḍakā were the most prominent.

According to Śrīdhara Svāmī, although the Bhāgavatam (9.1.11-12) has previously included Ikṣvāku among the ten sons begotten by Manu in his wife Śraddhā, this was a generalization. It is here specifically explained that Ikṣvāku was born simply from the sneezing of Manu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Vaivasvata Manu sneezed, Ikṣvāku was born from Manu's nostrils. King Ikṣvāku had one hundred sons, of whom Vikukṣi, Nimi and Daṇḍakā were the most prominent. The dynasty from Ikṣvāku, Manu’s son, was extensive. [Note: Sudyumna, who was born as a daughter and then transformed into a man, and the nine other sons of Vaivasvata Manu have been described already. Now the tenth son, Ikṣvākau is described.] This is now explained. Ikṣvāku was born out of Manu’s nostril when he sneezed. Śrīdhara Svāmī says that when it is said that ten sons were born from Manu’s wife Śraddhā, this is generalization, since Ikṣvāku was actually born from Manu’s nostril.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.5

↗
తేషాం పురస్తాదభవన్నార్యావర్తే నృపా నృప । పఞ్చవింశతి: పశ్చాచ్చ త్రయో మధ్యేఽపరేఽన్యత: ॥ ౫ ॥
teṣāṁ purastād abhavann
[teshaam purastaad abhavann]
āryāvarte nṛpā nṛpa
[aaryaavarte nripaa nripa]
paṣca-viṁśatiḥ paścāc ca
[pashcha-vimshatih pashchaach cha]
trayo madhye ’pare ’nyataḥ
[trayo madhye ’pare ’nyatah]
teṣām — among all of those sons purastāt — on the eastern side abhavan — they became āryāvarte — in the place within the Himālaya and Vindhya mountains known as Āryāvarta nṛpāḥ — kings nṛpa — O King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit) paṣca-viṁśatiḥ — twenty-five paścāt — on the western side ca — also trayaḥ — three of them madhye — in the middle (between east and west) apare — others anyataḥ — in other places.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
teṣāṁ purastād abhavann
teṣām
among all of those sons
purastāt
on the eastern side
abhavan
they became
āryāvarte nṛpā nṛpa
āryāvarte
in the place within the Himālaya and Vindhya mountains known as Āryāvarta
nṛpāḥ
kings
nṛpa
O King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit)
paṣca-viṁśatiḥ paścāc ca
paṣca-viṁśatiḥ
twenty-five
paścāt
on the western side
ca
also
trayo madhye ’pare ’nyataḥ
trayaḥ
three of them
madhye
in the middle (between east and west)
apare
others
anyataḥ
in other places.
Of the one hundred sons, twenty-five became kings in the western side of Āryāvarta, a place between the Himālaya and Vindhya mountains. Another twenty-five sons became kings in the east of Āryāvarta, and the three principal sons became kings in the middle. The other sons became kings in various other places.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Of the one hundred sons, twenty-five became kings in the eastern side of Āryāvarta. Another twenty-five sons became kings to the west of Āryāvarta, and the three principal sons became kings in the middle. The other sons became kings in various other places. Āryāvarta is a pious land between the Vindya and Himalaya ranges. East of that, stretching to the ocean, in separate areas, twenty-five sons became kings. West of Āryāvarta twenty-five became kings. The three eldest sons became kings of the middle area. Others became kings in the north and south.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.6

↗
స ఏకదాష్టకాశ్రాద్ధే ఇక్ష్వాకు: సుతమాదిశత్ । మాంసమానీయతాం మేధ్యం వికుక్షే గచ్ఛ మా చిరమ్ ॥ ౬ ॥
sa ekadāṣṭakā-śrāddhe
[sa ekadaashtakaa-shraaddhe]
ikṣvākuḥ sutam ādiśat
[ikshvaakuh sutam aadishat]
māṁsam ānīyatāṁ medhyaṁ
[maamsam aaneeyataam medhyam]
vikukṣe gaccha mā ciram
[vikukshe gachcha maa chiram]
saḥ — that king (Mahārāja Ikṣvāku) ekadā — once upon a time aṣṭakā-śrāddhe — during January, February and March, when offerings are made to the forefathers ikṣvākuḥ — King Ikṣvāku sutam — to his son ādiśat — ordered māṁsam — flesh ānīyatām — bring here medhyam — pure (obtained by hunting) vikukṣe — O Vikukṣi gaccha — immediately go mā ciram — without delay.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa ekadāṣṭakā-śrāddhe
saḥ
that king (Mahārāja Ikṣvāku)
ekadā
once upon a time
aṣṭakā-śrāddhe
during January, February and March, when offerings are made to the forefathers
ikṣvākuḥ sutam ādiśat
ikṣvākuḥ
King Ikṣvāku
sutam
to his son
ādiśat
ordered
māṁsam ānīyatāṁ medhyaṁ
māṁsam
flesh
ānīyatām
bring here
medhyam
pure (obtained by hunting)
vikukṣe gaccha mā ciram
vikukṣe
O Vikukṣi
gaccha
immediately go
mā ciram
without delay.
During the months of January, February and March, oblations offered to the forefathers are called aṣṭakā-śrāddha. The śrāddha ceremony is held during the dark fortnight of the month. When Mahārāja Ikṣvāku was performing his oblations in this ceremony, he ordered his son Vikukṣi to go immediately to the forest to bring some pure flesh.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Mahārāja Ikṣvāku was performing his oblations for the āṣṭakā-śraddha, he ordered his son Vikukṣi to go immediately to the forest to bring some pure flesh. Four verses explain why Vikukṣi became known as Śaśāda.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.7

↗
తథేతి స వనం గత్వా మృగాన్ హత్వా క్రియార్హణాన్ । శ్రాన్తో బుభుక్షితో వీర: శశం చాదదపస్మృతి: ॥ ౭ ॥
tatheti sa vanaṁ gatvā
[tatheti sa vanam gatvaa]
mṛgān hatvā kriyārhaṇān
[mrigaan hatvaa kriyaarhanaan]
śrānto bubhukṣito vīraḥ
[shraanto bubhukshito veerah]
śaśaṁ cādad apasmṛtiḥ
[shasham chaadad apasmritih]
tathā — according to the direction iti — thus saḥ — Vikukṣi vanam — to the forest gatvā — going mṛgān — animals hatvā — killing kriyā-arhaṇān — suitable for offering to the yajṣa in the śrāddha ceremony śrāntaḥ — when he was fatigued bubhukṣitaḥ — and hungry vīraḥ — the hero śaśam — a rabbit ca — also ādat — he ate apasmṛtiḥ — forgetting (that the flesh was meant for offering in the śrāddha).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatheti sa vanaṁ gatvā
tathā
according to the direction
mṛgān hatvā kriyārhaṇān
śrānto bubhukṣito vīraḥ
iti
thus
śaśaṁ cādad apasmṛtiḥ
saḥ
Vikukṣi
vanam
to the forest
gatvā
going
mṛgān
animals
hatvā
killing
kriyā-arhaṇān
suitable for offering to the yajṣa in the śrāddha ceremony
śrāntaḥ
when he was fatigued
bubhukṣitaḥ
and hungry
vīraḥ
the hero
śaśam
a rabbit
ca
also
ādat
he ate
apasmṛtiḥ
forgetting (that the flesh was meant for offering in the śrāddha).
Thereafter, Ikṣvāku’s son Vikukṣi went to the forest and killed many animals suitable for being offered as oblations. But when fatigued and hungry he became forgetful and ate a rabbit he had killed.

It is evident that kṣatriyas killed animals in the forest because the flesh of the animals was suitable to be offered at a particular type of yajṣa. Offering oblations to the forefathers in the ceremony known as śrāddha is also a kind of yajṣa. In this yajṣa, flesh obtained from the forest by hunting could be offered. However, in the present age, Kali-yuga, this kind of offering is forbidden. Quoting from the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said:

aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ sannyāsaṁ pala-paitṛkam devareṇa sutotpattiṁ kalau paṣca vivarjayet

“In this Age of Kali, five acts are forbidden: the offering of a horse in sacrifice, the offering of a cow in sacrifice, the acceptance of the order of sannyāsa, the offering of oblations of flesh to the forefathers, and a man’s begetting children in his brother’s wife.” The word pala-paitṛkam refers to an offering of flesh in oblations to forefathers. Formerly, such an offering was allowed, but in this age it is forbidden. In this age, Kali-yuga, everyone is expert in hunting animals, but most of the people are śūdras, not kṣatriyas. According to Vedic injunctions, however, only kṣatriyas are allowed to hunt, whereas śūdras are allowed to eat flesh after offering goats or other insignificant animals before the deity of goddess Kālī or similar demigods. On the whole, meat-eating is not completely forbidden; a particular class of men is allowed to eat meat according to various circumstances and injunctions. As far as eating beef is concerned, however, it is strictly prohibited to everyone. Thus in Bhagavad-gītā Kṛṣṇa personally speaks of go-rakṣyam, cow protection. Meat-eaters, according to their different positions and the directions of the śāstra, are allowed to eat flesh, but never the flesh of cows. Cows must be given all protection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, Ikṣvāku's son Vikukṣi went to the forest and killed animals suitable for being offered as oblations. But when fatigued and hungry, he became forgetful and ate a rabbit he had killed.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.8

↗
శేషం నివేదయామాస పిత్రే తేన చ తద్గురు: । చోదిత: ప్రోక్షణాయాహ దుష్టమేతదకర్మకమ్ ॥ ౮ ॥
śeṣaṁ nivedayām āsa
[shesham nivedayaam aasa]
pitre tena ca tad-guruḥ
[pitre tena cha tad-guruh]
coditaḥ prokṣaṇāyāha
[choditah prokshanaayaaha]
duṣṭam etad akarmakam
[dushtam etad akarmakam]
śeṣam — the remnants nivedayām āsa — he offered pitre — to his father tena — by him ca — also tat-guruḥ — their priest or spiritual master coditaḥ — being requested prokṣaṇāya — for purifying āha — said duṣṭam — polluted etat — all this flesh akarmakam — not fit to be used for offering in śrāddha..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śeṣaṁ nivedayām āsa
śeṣam
the remnants
nivedayām āsa
he offered
pitre tena ca tad-guruḥ
pitre
to his father
tena
by him
ca
also
tat-guruḥ
their priest or spiritual master
coditaḥ prokṣaṇāyāha
coditaḥ
being requested
prokṣaṇāya
for purifying
āha
said
duṣṭam etad akarmakam
duṣṭam
polluted
etat
all this flesh
akarmakam
not fit to be used for offering in śrāddha..
Vikukṣi offered the remnants of the flesh to King Ikṣvāku, who gave it to Vasiṣṭha for purification. But Vasiṣṭha could immediately understand that part of the flesh had already been taken by Vikukṣi, and therefore he said that it was unfit to be used in the śrāddha ceremony.

That which is meant to be offered in yajṣa cannot be tasted by anyone before being offered to the Deity. In our temples, this regulation is in effect. One cannot eat food from the kitchen unless it is offered to the Deity. If something is taken before being offered to the Deity, the entire preparation is polluted and can no longer be offered. Those engaged in Deity worship must know this very well so that they may be saved from committing offenses in Deity worship.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Vikukṣi offered the remnants of the flesh to King Ikṣvāku, who gave it to Vasiṣṭha for purification. But Vasiṣṭha said that it was polluted, unfit for the śrāddha ceremony. The guru was Vasiṣṭha. It was polluted because Vikukṣi had already eaten part of the offering.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.9

↗
జ్ఞాత్వా పుత్రస్య తత్ కర్మ గురుణాభిహితం నృప: । దేశాన్ని:సారయామాస సుతం త్యక్తవిధిం రుషా ॥ ౯ ॥
jṣātvā putrasya tat karma
[jshaatvaa putrasya tat karma]
guruṇābhihitaṁ nṛpaḥ
[gurunaabhihitam nripah]
deśān niḥsārayām āsa
[deshaan nihsaarayaam aasa]
sutaṁ tyakta-vidhiṁ ruṣā
[sutam tyakta-vidhim rushaa]
jṣātvā — knowing putrasya — of his son tat — that karma — action guruṇā — by the spiritual master (Vasiṣṭha) abhihitam — informed nṛpaḥ — the King (Ikṣvāku) deśāt — from the country niḥsārayām āsa — drove away sutam — his son tyakta-vidhim — because he violated the regulative principles ruṣā — out of anger.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jṣātvā putrasya tat karma
jṣātvā
knowing
putrasya
of his son
tat
that
karma
action
guruṇābhihitaṁ nṛpaḥ
guruṇā
by the spiritual master (Vasiṣṭha)
abhihitam
informed
nṛpaḥ
the King (Ikṣvāku)
deśān niḥsārayām āsa
deśāt
from the country
niḥsārayām āsa
drove away
sutaṁ tyakta-vidhiṁ ruṣā
sutam
his son
tyakta-vidhim
because he violated the regulative principles
ruṣā
out of anger.
When King Ikṣvāku, thus informed by Vasiṣṭha, understood what his son Vikukṣi had done, he was extremely angry. Thus he ordered Vikukṣi to leave the country because Vikukṣi had violated the regulative principles.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When King Ikṣvāku, thus informed by Vasiṣṭha, understood what his son Vikukṣi had done, out of anger he ordered Vikukṣi to leave the country because Vikukṣi had violated the rules.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.10

↗
స తు విప్రేణ సంవాదం జ్ఞాపకేన సమాచరన్ । త్యక్త్వా కలేవరం యోగీ స తేనావాప యత్ పరమ్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
sa tu vipreṇa saṁvādaṁ
[sa tu viprena samvaadam]
jṣāpakena samācaran
[jshaapakena samaacharan]
tyaktvā kalevaraṁ yogī
[tyaktvaa kalevaram yogee]
sa tenāvāpa yat param
[sa tenaavaapa yat param]
saḥ — Mahārāja Ikṣvāku tu — indeed vipreṇa — with the brāhmaṇa (Vasiṣṭha) saṁvādam — discussion jṣāpakena — with the informer samācaran — doing accordingly tyaktvā — giving up kalevaram — this body yogī — being a bhakti-yogī in the order of renunciation saḥ — the King tena — by such instruction avāpa — achieved yat — that position which param — supreme.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa tu vipreṇa saṁvādaṁ
saḥ
Mahārāja Ikṣvāku
tu
indeed
vipreṇa
with the brāhmaṇa (Vasiṣṭha)
saṁvādam
discussion
jṣāpakena samācaran
jṣāpakena
with the informer
samācaran
doing accordingly
tyaktvā kalevaraṁ yogī
tyaktvā
giving up
kalevaram
this body
yogī
being a bhakti-yogī in the order of renunciation
sa tenāvāpa yat param
saḥ
the King
tena
by such instruction
avāpa
achieved
yat
that position which
param
supreme.
Having been instructed by the great and learned brāhmaṇa Vasiṣṭha, who discoursed about the Absolute Truth, Mahārāja Ikṣvāku became renounced. By following the principles for a yogī, he certainly achieved the supreme perfection after giving up his material body.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Instituting the instructions give by Vasiṣṭha, Mahārāja Ikṣvāku became renounced and achieved the supreme perfection after giving up his material body. Ikṣvāku, executing the instructions given by Vasiṣṭha who gave knowledge, became detached.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.11

↗
పితర్యుపరతేఽభ్యేత్య వికుక్షి: పృథివీమిమామ్ । శాసదీజే హరిం యజ్ఞై: శశాద ఇతి విశ్రుత: ॥ ౧౧ ॥
pitary uparate ’bhyetya
[pitary uparate ’bhyetya]
vikukṣiḥ pṛthivīm imām
[vikukshih prithiveem imaam]
śāsad īje hariṁ yajṣaiḥ
[shaasad eeje harim yajshaih]
śaśāda iti viśrutaḥ
[shashaada iti vishrutah]
pitari — when his father uparate — upon being relieved of the kingdom abhyetya — having come back vikukṣiḥ — the son named Vikukṣi pṛthivīm — the planet earth imām — this śāsat — ruling īje — worshiped harim — the Supreme Personality of Godhead yajṣaiḥ — by performing various sacrifices śaśa-adaḥ — Śaśāda (“the eater of a rabbit”) iti — thus viśrutaḥ — celebrated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pitary uparate ’bhyetya
pitari
when his father
uparate
upon being relieved of the kingdom
abhyetya
having come back
vikukṣiḥ pṛthivīm imām
vikukṣiḥ
the son named Vikukṣi
pṛthivīm
the planet earth
imām
this
śāsad īje hariṁ yajṣaiḥ
śāsat
ruling
īje
worshiped
harim
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
yajṣaiḥ
by performing various sacrifices
śaśāda iti viśrutaḥ
śaśa-adaḥ
Śaśāda (“the eater of a rabbit”)
iti
thus
viśrutaḥ
celebrated.
After his father’s disappearance, Vikukṣi returned to the country and thus became the king, ruling the planet earth and performing various sacrifices to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Vikukṣi later became celebrated as Śaśāda.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After his father's disappearance, Vikukṣi returned to the country and thus became the king, ruling the planet earth and worshipped the Lord by performing various sacrifices. Vikukṣi later became celebrated as Saśāda (rabbit eater). Śāsat means “he protected.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.12

↗
పురఞ్జయస్తస్య సుత ఇన్ద్రవాహ ఇతీరిత: । కకుత్స్థ ఇతి చాప్యుక్త: శ‍ృణు నామాని కర్మభి: ॥ ౧౨ ॥
puraṣjayas tasya suta
[purashjayas tasya suta]
indravāha itīritaḥ
[indravaaha iteeritah]
kakutstha iti cāpy uktaḥ
[kakutstha iti chaapy uktah]
śṛṇu nāmāni karmabhiḥ
[shrinu naamaani karmabhih]
puram-jayaḥ — Puraṣjaya (“the conqueror of the residence”) tasya — his (Vikukṣi’s) sutaḥ — son indra-vāhaḥ — Indravāha (“he whose carrier is Indra”) iti — thus īritaḥ — known as such kakutsthaḥ — Kakutstha (“situated on the hump of a bull”) iti — thus ca — also api — indeed uktaḥ — known as such śṛṇu — just hear nāmāni — all the names karmabhiḥ — according to one’s work.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
puraṣjayas tasya suta
puram-jayaḥ
Puraṣjaya (“the conqueror of the residence”)
tasya
his (Vikukṣi’s)
sutaḥ
son
indravāha itīritaḥ
indra-vāhaḥ
Indravāha (“he whose carrier is Indra”)
iti
thus
īritaḥ
known as such
kakutstha iti cāpy uktaḥ
kakutsthaḥ
Kakutstha (“situated on the hump of a bull”)
iti
thus
ca
also
api
indeed
uktaḥ
known as such
śṛṇu nāmāni karmabhiḥ
śṛṇu
just hear
nāmāni
all the names
karmabhiḥ
according to one’s work.
The son of Śaśāda was Puraṣjaya, who is also known as Indravāha and sometimes as Kakutstha. Please hear from me how he received different names for different activities.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Saśāda was Puraṣjaya, who is also known as Indravāha and sometimes as Kakutstha. Please hear from me how he received different names for different activities. He was called Puraṣjaya because he conquered the city of the demons. He was called Indravāha because Indra became his carrier. He was called Kakutsha because he stood on the back of a bull. Hear how these names arose by his activities.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.13

↗
కృతాన్త ఆసీత్ సమరో దేవానాం సహ దానవై: । పార్ష్ణిగ్రాహో వృతో వీరో దేవైర్దైత్యపరాజితై: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
kṛtānta āsīt samaro
[kritaanta aaseet samaro]
devānāṁ saha dānavaiḥ
[devaanaam saha daanavaih]
pārṣṇigrāho vṛto vīro
[paarshnigraaho vrito veero]
devair daitya-parājitaiḥ
[devair daitya-paraajitaih]
kṛta-antaḥ — a devastating war āsīt — there was samaraḥ — a fight devānām — of the demigods saha — with dānavaiḥ — the demons pārṣṇigrāhaḥ — a very good assistant vṛtaḥ — accepted vīraḥ — a hero devaiḥ — by the demigods daitya — by the demons parājitaiḥ — who had been conquered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛtānta āsīt samaro
kṛta-antaḥ
a devastating war
āsīt
there was
samaraḥ
a fight
devānāṁ saha dānavaiḥ
devānām
of the demigods
saha
with
dānavaiḥ
the demons
pārṣṇigrāho vṛto vīro
pārṣṇigrāhaḥ
a very good assistant
vṛtaḥ
accepted
vīraḥ
a hero
devair daitya-parājitaiḥ
devaiḥ
by the demigods
daitya
by the demons
parājitaiḥ
who had been conquered.
Formerly, there was a devastating war between the demigods and the demons. The demigods, having been defeated, accepted Puraṣjaya as their assistant and then conquered the demons. Therefore this hero is known as Puraṣjaya, “he who conquered the residence of the demons.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Formerly, there was a devastating war between the devatās and the demons. The devatās, having been defeated, accepted Puraṣjaya as their assistant. There was a war similar to the destruction of the universe. During that war Puraṣjaya was accepted as an ally by the devatās.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.14

↗
వచనాద్ దేవదేవస్య విష్ణోర్విశ్వాత్మన: ప్రభో: । వాహనత్వే వృతస్తస్య బభూవేన్ద్రో మహావృష: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
vacanād deva-devasya
[vachanaad deva-devasya]
viṣṇor viśvātmanaḥ prabhoḥ
[vishnor vishvaatmanah prabhoh]
vāhanatve vṛtas tasya
[vaahanatve vritas tasya]
babhūvendro mahā-vṛṣaḥ
[babhoovendro mahaa-vrishah]
vacanāt — by the order or the words deva-devasya — of the Supreme Lord of all demigods viṣṇoḥ — Lord Viṣṇu viśva-ātmanaḥ — the Supersoul of the entire creation prabhoḥ — the Lord, the controller vāhanatve — because of becoming the carrier vṛtaḥ — engaged tasya — in the service of Puraṣjaya babhūva — he became indraḥ — the King of heaven mahā-vṛṣaḥ — a great bull.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vacanād deva-devasya
vacanāt
by the order or the words
deva-devasya
of the Supreme Lord of all demigods
viṣṇor viśvātmanaḥ prabhoḥ
viṣṇoḥ
Lord Viṣṇu
viśva-ātmanaḥ
the Supersoul of the entire creation
prabhoḥ
the Lord, the controller
vāhanatve vṛtas tasya
vāhanatve
because of becoming the carrier
vṛtaḥ
engaged
tasya
in the service of Puraṣjaya
babhūvendro mahā-vṛṣaḥ
babhūva
he became
indraḥ
the King of heaven
mahā-vṛṣaḥ
a great bull.
Puraṣjaya agreed to kill all the demons, on the condition that Indra would be his carrier. Because of pride, Indra could not accept this proposal, but later, by the order of the Supreme Lord, Viṣṇu, Indra did accept it and became a great bull carrier for Puraṣjaya.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra became a great bull, and consented to be the carrier of Puraṣjaya by the order of the Supreme Lord Viṣṇu, soul of the universe. “If Indra becomes my carrier, then I will kill the demons.” Indra, out of shame, refused to be his carrier, but by the order of Viṣṇu, he became a huge bull and carried Puraṣjaya.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.15-16

↗
స సన్నద్ధో ధనుర్దివ్యమాదాయ విశిఖాఞ్ఛితాన్ । స్తూయమానస్తమారుహ్య యుయుత్సు: కకుది స్థిత: ॥ ౧౫ ॥ తేజసాప్యాయితో విష్ణో: పురుషస్య మహాత్మన: । ప్రతీచ్యాం దిశి దైత్యానాం న్యరుణత్ త్రిదశై: పురమ్ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
sa sannaddho dhanur divyam
[sa sannaddho dhanur divyam]
ādāya viśikhāṣ chitān
[aadaaya vishikhaash chitaan]
stūyamānas tam āruhya
[stooyamaanas tam aaruhya]
yuyutsuḥ kakudi sthitaḥ
[yuyutsuh kakudi sthitah]
tejasāpyāyito viṣṇoḥ
[tejasaapyaayito vishnoh]
puruṣasya mahātmanaḥ
[purushasya mahaatmanah]
pratīcyāṁ diśi daityānāṁ
[prateechyaam dishi daityaanaam]
nyaruṇat tridaśaiḥ puram
[nyarunat tridashaih puram]
saḥ — he, Puraṣjaya sannaddhaḥ — being well equipped dhanuḥ divyam — a first-class or transcendental bow ādāya — taking viśikhān — arrows śitān — very sharp stūyamānaḥ — being praised very much tam — him (the bull) āruhya — getting on yuyutsuḥ — prepared to fight kakudi — on the hump of the bull sthitaḥ — being situated tejasā — by the power āpyāyitaḥ — being favored viṣṇoḥ — of Lord Viṣṇu puruṣasya — the Supreme Person mahā-ātmanaḥ — the Supersoul pratīcyām — on the western diśi — direction daityānām — of the demons nyaruṇat — captured tridaśaiḥ — surrounded by the demigods puram — the residence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa sannaddho dhanur divyam
saḥ
he, Puraṣjaya
sannaddhaḥ
being well equipped
dhanuḥ divyam
a first-class or transcendental bow
ādāya viśikhāṣ chitān
ādāya
taking
viśikhān
arrows
stūyamānas tam āruhya
yuyutsuḥ kakudi sthitaḥ
tejasāpyāyito viṣṇoḥ
puruṣasya mahātmanaḥ
pratīcyāṁ diśi daityānāṁ
śitān
very sharp
stūyamānaḥ
being praised very much
tam
him (the bull)
nyaruṇat tridaśaiḥ puram
āruhya
getting on
yuyutsuḥ
prepared to fight
kakudi
on the hump of the bull
sthitaḥ
being situated
tejasā
by the power
āpyāyitaḥ
being favored
viṣṇoḥ
of Lord Viṣṇu
puruṣasya
the Supreme Person
mahā-ātmanaḥ
the Supersoul
pratīcyām
on the western
diśi
direction
daityānām
of the demons
nyaruṇat
captured
tridaśaiḥ
surrounded by the demigods
puram
the residence.
Well protected by armor and desiring to fight, Puraṣjaya took up a transcendental bow and very sharp arrows, and, while being highly praised by the demigods, he got up on the back of the bull [Indra] and sat on its hump. Thus he is known as Kakutstha. Being empowered by Lord Viṣṇu, who is the Supersoul and the Supreme Person, Puraṣjaya sat on the great bull and is therefore known as Indravāha. Surrounded by the demigods, he attacked the residence of the demons in the west.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Well protected by armor and desiring to fight, Puraṣjaya took up a celestial bow and sharp arrows, and, while being highly praised by the devatās, he got up on the back of the bull [Indra] and sat on its hump. Empowered by Lord Viṣṇu, who is the Supersoul and the Supreme Person, Puraṣjaya, surrounded the city of the demons in the west along with the devatās. Puraṣjaya, mounting the bull who was Indra is thus called Indravāha (he whose carrier is Indra). Because he sat on the hump of the bull he is called Kakutsha (situated on the hump). He surrounded the city with the devatās.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.17

↗
తైస్తస్య చాభూత్ప్రధనం తుములం లోమహర్షణమ్ । యమాయ భల్లైరనయద్ దైత్యాన్ అభియయుర్మృధే ॥ ౧౭ ॥
tais tasya cābhūt pradhanaṁ
[tais tasya chaabhoot pradhanam]
tumulaṁ loma-harṣaṇam
[tumulam loma-harshanam]
yamāya bhallair anayad
[yamaaya bhallair anayad]
daityān abhiyayur mṛdhe
[daityaan abhiyayur mridhe]
taiḥ — with the demons tasya — of him, Puraṣjaya ca — also abhūt — there was pradhanam — a fight tumulam — very fierce loma-harṣaṇam — the hearing of which makes one’s hairs stand on end yamāya — to the residence of Yamarāja bhallaiḥ — by arrows anayat — sent daityān — the demons abhiyayuḥ — who came toward him mṛdhe — in that fight.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tais tasya cābhūt pradhanaṁ
taiḥ
with the demons
tasya
of him, Puraṣjaya
ca
also
abhūt
there was
pradhanam
a fight
tumulaṁ loma-harṣaṇam
tumulam
very fierce
loma-harṣaṇam
the hearing of which makes one’s hairs stand on end
yamāya bhallair anayad
yamāya
to the residence of Yamarāja
bhallaiḥ
by arrows
anayat
sent
daityān abhiyayur mṛdhe
daityān
the demons
abhiyayuḥ
who came toward him
mṛdhe
in that fight.
There was a fierce battle between the demons and Puraṣjaya. Indeed, it was so fierce that when one hears about it one’s hairs stand on end. All the demons bold enough to come before Puraṣjaya were immediately sent to the residence of Yamarāja by his arrows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
There was a fierce, hair-raising battle between the demons and Puraṣjaya. Puraṣjaya sent all the demons who approached him in battle to the abode of death by his arrows. He killed them all. Dative case (yamāya) is used to express an action leading to a destination. [Note: Gatyartha-karmaṇi Pāṇini 2.3.12]
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.18

↗
తస్యేషుపాతాభిముఖం యుగాన్తాగ్నిమివోల్బణమ్ । విసృజ్య దుద్రువుర్దైత్యా హన్యమానా: స్వమాలయమ్ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
tasyeṣu-pātābhimukhaṁ
[tasyeshu-paataabhimukham]
yugāntāgnim ivolbaṇam
[yugaantaagnim ivolbanam]
visṛjya dudruvur daityā
[visrijya dudruvur daityaa]
hanyamānāḥ svam ālayam
[hanyamaanaah svam aalayam]
tasya — his (Puraṣjaya’s) iṣu-pāta — the throwing of the arrows abhimukham — in front of yuga-anta — at the end of the millennium agnim — the flames iva — exactly like ulbaṇam — fierce visṛjya — giving up the attack dudruvuḥ — ran away daityāḥ — all the demons hanyamānāḥ — being killed (by Puraṣjaya) svam — own ālayam — to the residence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyeṣu-pātābhimukhaṁ
tasya
his (Puraṣjaya’s)
yugāntāgnim ivolbaṇam
visṛjya dudruvur daityā
iṣu-pāta
the throwing of the arrows
abhimukham
in front of
yuga-anta
at the end of the millennium
agnim
the flames
iva
exactly like
ulbaṇam
fierce
visṛjya
giving up the attack
dudruvuḥ
ran away
daityāḥ
all the demons
hanyamānāḥ svam ālayam
hanyamānāḥ
being killed (by Puraṣjaya)
svam
own
ālayam
to the residence.
To save themselves from the blazing arrows of Indravāha, which resembled the flames of devastation at the end of the millennium, the demons who remained when the rest of their army was killed fled very quickly to their respective homes.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Giving up the attack of arrows of Indravāha, which resembled the flames of devastation at the end of the millennium, the demons, being wounded, fled to Pātāla. Those demons who remained fled to Pātāla.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.19

↗
జిత్వా పురం ధనం సర్వం సశ్రీకం వజ్రపాణయే । ప్రత్యయచ్ఛత్ స రాజర్షిరితి నామభిరాహృత: ॥ ౧౯ ॥
jitvā paraṁ dhanaṁ sarvaṁ
[jitvaa param dhanam sarvam]
sastrīkaṁ vajra-pāṇaye
[sastreekam vajra-paanaye]
pratyayacchat sa rājarṣir
[pratyayachchat sa raajarshir]
iti nāmabhir āhṛtaḥ
[iti naamabhir aahritah]
jitvā — conquering param — enemies dhanam — wealth sarvam — everything sa-strīkam — with their wives vajra-pāṇaye — unto Indra, who carries the thunderbolt pratyayacchat — returned and delivered saḥ — that rāja-ṛṣiḥ — saintly king (Puraṣjaya) iti — thus nāmabhiḥ — by names āhṛtaḥ — was called.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jitvā paraṁ dhanaṁ sarvaṁ
jitvā
conquering
param
enemies
dhanam
wealth
sarvam
everything
sastrīkaṁ vajra-pāṇaye
sa-strīkam
with their wives
vajra-pāṇaye
unto Indra, who carries the thunderbolt
pratyayacchat sa rājarṣir
pratyayacchat
returned and delivered
saḥ
that
rāja-ṛṣiḥ
saintly king (Puraṣjaya)
iti nāmabhir āhṛtaḥ
iti
thus
nāmabhiḥ
by names
āhṛtaḥ
was called.
After conquering the enemy, the saintly king Puraṣjaya gave everything, including the enemy’s riches and wives, to Indra, who carries a thunderbolt. For this he is celebrated as Puraṣjaya. Thus Puraṣjaya is known by different names because of his different activities.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After conquering the enemy, the saintly king Puraṣjaya gave everything, including the enemy's riches and wives, to Indra, who carries a thunderbolt. For this he is celebrated by different names because of his different activities. By conquering the demons’ city, he was known as Puraṣjaya. He gave everything to Indra, and Indra gave it to Puraṣjaya. Therefore the King was known by various names. Another version has āhutaḥ, but the meaning is the same.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.20

↗
పురఞ్జయస్య పుత్రోఽభూదనేనాస్తత్సుత: పృథు: । విశ్వగన్ధిస్తతశ్చన్ద్రో యువనాశ్వస్తు తత్సుత: ॥ ౨౦ ॥
puraṣjayasya putro ’bhūd
[purashjayasya putro ’bhood]
anenās tat-sutaḥ pṛthuḥ
[anenaas tat-sutah prithuh]
viśvagandhis tataś candro
[vishvagandhis tatash chandro]
yuvanāśvas tu tat-sutaḥ
[yuvanaashvas tu tat-sutah]
puraṣjayasya — of Puraṣjaya putraḥ — son abhūt — was born anenāḥ — by the name Anenā tat-sutaḥ — his son pṛthuḥ — of the name Pṛthu viśvagandhiḥ — of the name Viśvagandhi tataḥ — his son candraḥ — by the name Candra yuvanāśvaḥ — of the name Yuvanāśva tu — indeed tat-sutaḥ — his son.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
puraṣjayasya putro ’bhūd
puraṣjayasya
of Puraṣjaya
putraḥ
son
abhūt
was born
anenās tat-sutaḥ pṛthuḥ
anenāḥ
by the name Anenā
tat-sutaḥ
his son
pṛthuḥ
of the name Pṛthu
viśvagandhis tataś candro
viśvagandhiḥ
of the name Viśvagandhi
tataḥ
his son
candraḥ
by the name Candra
yuvanāśvas tu tat-sutaḥ
yuvanāśvaḥ
of the name Yuvanāśva
tu
indeed
tat-sutaḥ
his son.
The son of Puraṣjaya was known as Anenā, Anenā’s son was Pṛthu, and Pṛthu’s son was Viśvagandhi. Viśvagandhi’s son was Candra, and Candra’s son was Yuvanāśva.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Puraṣjaya was known as Anenā, Anenā's son was Pṛthu, and Pṛthu's son was Viśvagandhi. Viśvagandhi's son was Candra, and Candra's son was Yuvanāśva.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.21

↗
శ్రావస్తస్తత్సుతో యేన శ్రావస్తీ నిర్మమే పురీ । బృహదశ్వస్తు శ్రావస్తిస్తత: కువలయాశ్వక: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
śrāvastas tat-suto yena
[shraavastas tat-suto yena]
śrāvastī nirmame purī
[shraavastee nirmame puree]
bṛhadaśvas tu śrāvastis
[brihadashvas tu shraavastis]
tataḥ kuvalayāśvakaḥ
[tatah kuvalayaashvakah]
śrāvastaḥ — by the name Śrāvasta tat-sutaḥ — the son of Yuvanāśva yena — by whom śrāvastī — of the name Śrāvastī nirmame — was constructed purī — the great township bṛhadaśvaḥ — Bṛhadaśva tu — however śrāvastiḥ — begotten by Śrāvasta tataḥ — from him kuvalayāśvakaḥ — of the name Kuvalayāśva.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrāvastas tat-suto yena
śrāvastaḥ
by the name Śrāvasta
tat-sutaḥ
the son of Yuvanāśva
yena
by whom
śrāvastī nirmame purī
śrāvastī
of the name Śrāvastī
nirmame
was constructed
purī
the great township
bṛhadaśvas tu śrāvastis
bṛhadaśvaḥ
Bṛhadaśva
tu
however
śrāvastiḥ
begotten by Śrāvasta
tataḥ kuvalayāśvakaḥ
tataḥ
from him
kuvalayāśvakaḥ
of the name Kuvalayāśva.
The son of Yuvanāśva was Śrāvasta, who constructed a township known as Śrāvastī Purī. The son of Śrāvasta was Bṛhadaśva, and his son was Kuvalayāśva. In this way the dynasty increased.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Yuvanāśva was Śrāvasta, who constructed a township known as Śrāvastī. The son of Śrāvasta was Bṛhadaśva, and his son was Kuvalayāśva.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.22

↗
య: ప్రియార్థముతఙ్కస్య ధున్ధునామాసురం బలీ । సుతానామేకవింశత్యా సహస్రైరహనద్ వృత: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
yaḥ priyārtham utaṅkasya
[yah priyaartham utankasya]
dhundhu-nāmāsuraṁ balī
[dhundhu-naamaasuram balee]
sutānām eka-viṁśatyā
[sutaanaam eka-vimshatyaa]
sahasrair ahanad vṛtaḥ
[sahasrair ahanad vritah]
yaḥ — he who priya-artham — for the satisfaction utaṅkasya — of the great sage Utaṅka dhundhu-nāma — of the name Dhundhu asuram — a demon balī — very powerful (Kuvalayāśva) sutānām — of sons eka-viṁśatyā — by twenty-one sahasraiḥ — thousands ahanat — killed vṛtaḥ — surrounded.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ priyārtham utaṅkasya
yaḥ
he who
priya-artham
for the satisfaction
utaṅkasya
of the great sage Utaṅka
dhundhu-nāmāsuraṁ balī
dhundhu-nāma
of the name Dhundhu
asuram
a demon
balī
very powerful (Kuvalayāśva)
sutānām eka-viṁśatyā
sutānām
of sons
eka-viṁśatyā
by twenty-one
sahasraiḥ
thousands
sahasrair ahanad vṛtaḥ
ahanat
killed
vṛtaḥ
surrounded.
To satisfy the sage Utaṅka, the greatly powerful Kuvalayāśva killed a demon named Dhundhu. He did this with the assistance of his twenty-one thousand sons.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
To satisfy the sage Utaṅka, the powerful Kuvalayāśva killed a demon named Dhundhu with the assistance of his twenty-one thousand sons. With the assistance of his twenty-one thousand sons, he killed the demon.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.23-24

↗
ధున్ధుమార ఇతి ఖ్యాతస్తత్సుతాస్తే చ జజ్వలు: । ధున్ధోర్ముఖాగ్నినా సర్వే త్రయ ఏవావశేషితా: ॥ ౨౩ ॥ ద‍ృఢాశ్వ: కపిలాశ్వశ్చ భద్రాశ్వ ఇతి భారత । ద‍ృఢాశ్వపుత్రో హర్యశ్వో నికుమ్భస్తత్సుత: స్మృత: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
dhundhumāra iti khyātas
[dhundhumaara iti khyaatas]
tat-sutās te ca jajvaluḥ
[tat-sutaas te cha jajvaluh]
dhundhor mukhāgninā sarve
[dhundhor mukhaagninaa sarve]
traya evāvaśeṣitāḥ
[traya evaavasheshitaah]
dṛḍhāśvaḥ kapilāśvaś ca
[dridhaashvah kapilaashvash cha]
bhadrāśva iti bhārata
[bhadraashva iti bhaarata]
dṛḍhāśva-putro haryaśvo
[dridhaashva-putro haryashvo]
nikumbhas tat-sutaḥ smṛtaḥ
[nikumbhas tat-sutah smritah]
dhundhu-māraḥ — the killer of Dhundhu iti — thus khyātaḥ — celebrated tat-sutāḥ — his sons te — all of them ca — also jajvaluḥ — burned dhundhoḥ — of Dhundhu mukha-agninā — by the fire emanating from the mouth sarve — all of them trayaḥ — three eva — only avaśeṣitāḥ — remained alive dṛḍhāśvaḥ — Dṛḍhāśva kapilāśvaḥ — Kapilāśva ca — and bhadrāśvaḥ — Bhadrāśva iti — thus bhārata — O Mahārāja Parīkṣit dṛḍhāśva-putraḥ — the son of Dṛḍhāśva haryaśvaḥ — named Haryaśva nikumbhaḥ — Nikumbha tat-sutaḥ — his son smṛtaḥ — well known.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhundhumāra iti khyātas
dhundhu-māraḥ
the killer of Dhundhu
iti
thus
khyātaḥ
celebrated
tat-sutās te ca jajvaluḥ
tat-sutāḥ
his sons
te
all of them
ca
also
jajvaluḥ
burned
dhundhor mukhāgninā sarve
dhundhoḥ
of Dhundhu
mukha-agninā
by the fire emanating from the mouth
sarve
all of them
traya evāvaśeṣitāḥ
trayaḥ
three
eva
only
avaśeṣitāḥ
remained alive
dṛḍhāśvaḥ kapilāśvaś ca
dṛḍhāśvaḥ
Dṛḍhāśva
kapilāśvaḥ
Kapilāśva
ca
and
bhadrāśva iti bhārata
bhadrāśvaḥ
Bhadrāśva
iti
thus
bhārata
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit
dṛḍhāśva-putro haryaśvo
dṛḍhāśva-putraḥ
the son of Dṛḍhāśva
haryaśvaḥ
named Haryaśva
nikumbhas tat-sutaḥ smṛtaḥ
nikumbhaḥ
Nikumbha
tat-sutaḥ
his son
smṛtaḥ
well known.
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, for this reason Kuvalayāśva is celebrated as Dhundhumāra [“the killer of Dhundhu”]. All but three of his sons, however, were burned to ashes by the fire emanating from Dhundhu’s mouth. The remaining sons were Dṛḍhāśva, Kapilāśva and Bhadrāśva. From Dṛḍhāśva came a son named Haryaśva, whose son is celebrated as Nikumbha.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, for this reason Kuvalayāśva is celebrated as Dhundhumāra "the killer of Dhundhu". All but three of his sons, however, were burned to ashes by the fire emanating from Dhundhu's mouth. The remaining sons were Dṛḍhāśva, Kapilāśva and Bhadrāśva. From Dṛḍhāśva came a son named Haryaśva, whose son is celebrated as Nikumbha.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.25

↗
బహులాశ్వో నికుమ్భస్య కృశాశ్వోఽథాస్య సేనజిత్ । యువనాశ్వోఽభవత్ తస్య సోఽనపత్యో వనం గత: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
bahulāśvo nikumbhasya
[bahulaashvo nikumbhasya]
kṛśāśvo ’thāsya senajit
[krishaashvo ’thaasya senajit]
yuvanāśvo ’bhavat tasya
[yuvanaashvo ’bhavat tasya]
so ’napatyo vanaṁ gataḥ
[so ’napatyo vanam gatah]
bahulāśvaḥ — of the name Bahulāśva nikumbhasya — of Nikumbha kṛśāśvaḥ — of the name Kṛśāśva atha — thereafter asya — of Kṛśāśva senajit — Senajit yuvanāśvaḥ — of the name Yuvanāśva abhavat — was born tasya — of Senajit saḥ — he anapatyaḥ — without any sons vanam gataḥ — retired to the forest as a vānaprastha..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bahulāśvo nikumbhasya
bahulāśvaḥ
of the name Bahulāśva
nikumbhasya
of Nikumbha
kṛśāśvo ’thāsya senajit
kṛśāśvaḥ
of the name Kṛśāśva
yuvanāśvo ’bhavat tasya
atha
thereafter
asya
of Kṛśāśva
senajit
Senajit
yuvanāśvaḥ
of the name Yuvanāśva
abhavat
was born
so ’napatyo vanaṁ gataḥ
tasya
of Senajit
saḥ
he
anapatyaḥ
without any sons
vanam gataḥ
retired to the forest as a vānaprastha..
The son of Nikumbha was Bahulāśva, the son of Bahulāśva was Kṛśāśva, the son of Kṛśāśva was Senajit, and the son of Senajit was Yuvanāśva. Yuvanāśva had no sons, and thus he retired from family life and went to the forest.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Nikumbha was Bahulāśva, the son of Bahulāśva was Kṛśāśva, the son of Kṛśāśva was Senajit, and the son of Senajit was Yuvanāśva. Yuvanāśva had no sons, and thus he retired from family life and went to the forest.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.26

↗
భార్యాశతేన నిర్విణ్ణ ఋషయోఽస్య కృపాలవ: । ఇష్టిం స్మ వర్తయాంచక్రురైన్ద్రీం తే సుసమాహితా: ॥ ౨౬ ॥
bhāryā-śatena nirviṇṇa
[bhaaryaa-shatena nirvinna]
ṛṣayo ’sya kṛpālavaḥ
[rishayo ’sya kripaalavah]
iṣṭiṁ sma vartayāṁ cakrur
[ishtim sma vartayaam chakrur]
aindrīṁ te susamāhitāḥ
[aindreem te susamaahitaah]
bhāryā-śatena — with one hundred wives nirviṇṇaḥ — very morose ṛṣayaḥ — the sages (in the forest) asya — upon him kṛpālavaḥ — very merciful iṣṭim — a ritualistic ceremony sma — in the past vartayām cakruḥ — began to execute aindrīm — known as an Indra-yajṣa te — all of them su-samāhitāḥ — being very careful and attentive.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhāryā-śatena nirviṇṇa
bhāryā-śatena
with one hundred wives
nirviṇṇaḥ
very morose
ṛṣayo ’sya kṛpālavaḥ
ṛṣayaḥ
the sages (in the forest)
asya
upon him
kṛpālavaḥ
very merciful
iṣṭiṁ sma vartayāṁ cakrur
iṣṭim
a ritualistic ceremony
sma
in the past
vartayām cakruḥ
began to execute
aindrīṁ te susamāhitāḥ
aindrīm
known as an Indra-yajṣa
te
all of them
su-samāhitāḥ
being very careful and attentive.
Although Yuvanāśva went into the forest with his one hundred wives, all of them were very morose. The sages in the forest, however, being very kind to the King, began very carefully and attentively performing an Indra-yajṣa so that the King might have a son.

One may enter the vānaprastha order of life with his wife, but the vānaprastha order means complete retirement from household life. Although King Yuvanāśva retired from family life, he and his wives were always morose because he had no son.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Yuvanāśva and his one hundred wives were morose. The sages in the forest, however, being very kind to the King, began very attentively performing an Indra-yajṣa.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.27

↗
రాజా తద్ యజ్ఞసదనం ప్రవిష్టో నిశి తర్షిత: । ద‍ృష్ట్వా శయానాన్ విప్రాంస్తాన్ పపౌ మన్త్రజలం స్వయమ్ ॥ ౨౭ ॥
rājā tad-yajṣa-sadanaṁ
[raajaa tad-yajsha-sadanam]
praviṣṭo niśi tarṣitaḥ
[pravishto nishi tarshitah]
dṛṣṭvā śayānān viprāṁs tān
[drishtvaa shayaanaan vipraams taan]
papau mantra-jalaṁ svayam
[papau mantra-jalam svayam]
rājā — the King (Yuvanāśva) tat-yajṣa-sadanam — the arena of sacrifice praviṣṭaḥ — entered niśi — at night tarṣitaḥ — being thirsty dṛṣṭvā — seeing śayānān — lying down viprān — all the brāhmaṇas tān — all of them papau — drank mantra-jalam — water sanctified by mantras svayam — personally.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājā tad-yajṣa-sadanaṁ
rājā
the King (Yuvanāśva)
tat-yajṣa-sadanam
the arena of sacrifice
praviṣṭo niśi tarṣitaḥ
praviṣṭaḥ
entered
niśi
at night
tarṣitaḥ
being thirsty
dṛṣṭvā śayānān viprāṁs tān
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
śayānān
lying down
viprān
all the brāhmaṇas
tān
all of them
papau mantra-jalaṁ svayam
papau
drank
mantra-jalam
water sanctified by mantras
svayam
personally.
Being thirsty one night, the King entered the arena of sacrifice, and when he saw all the brāhmaṇas lying down, he personally drank the sanctified water meant to be drunk by his wife.

Yajṣas performed by brāhmaṇas according to Vedic ritualistic ceremonies are so potent that the sanctifying of water by Vedic mantras can bring about the desired result. In this instance, the brāhmaṇas sanctified the water so that the King’s wife might drink it in the yajṣa, but by providence the King himself went there at night and, being thirsty, drank the water.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being thirsty one night, the King entered the arena of sacrifice, and when he saw all the brāhmaṇas lying down, he personally drank the sanctified water meant to be drunk by his wife. Being thirsty, he drank water sanctified by mantras meant for his wife.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.28

↗
ఉత్థితాస్తే నిశమ్యాథ వ్యుదకం కలశం ప్రభో । పప్రచ్ఛు: కస్య కర్మేదం పీతం పుంసవనం జలమ్ ॥ ౨౮ ॥
utthitās te niśamyātha
[utthitaas te nishamyaatha]
vyudakaṁ kalaśaṁ prabho
[vyudakam kalasham prabho]
papracchuḥ kasya karmedaṁ
[paprachchuh kasya karmedam]
pītaṁ puṁsavanaṁ jalam
[peetam pumsavanam jalam]
utthitāḥ — after awakening te — all of them niśamya — seeing atha — thereafter vyudakam — empty kalaśam — the waterpot prabho — O King Parīkṣit papracchuḥ — inquired kasya — whose karma — act idam — this pītam — drunk puṁsavanam — which was to cause the birth of a child jalam — water.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
utthitās te niśamyātha
utthitāḥ
after awakening
te
all of them
niśamya
seeing
atha
thereafter
vyudakaṁ kalaśaṁ prabho
vyudakam
empty
kalaśam
the waterpot
prabho
O King Parīkṣit
papracchuḥ kasya karmedaṁ
papracchuḥ
inquired
kasya
whose
karma
act
idam
this
pītaṁ puṁsavanaṁ jalam
pītam
drunk
puṁsavanam
which was to cause the birth of a child
jalam
water.
When the brāhmaṇas got up from bed and saw the waterpot empty, they inquired who had done this work of drinking the water meant for begetting a child.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the brāhmaṇas got up from bed and saw the water pot empty, they inquired who had done this act of drinking the water meant for begetting a child.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.29

↗
రాజ్ఞా పీతం విదిత్వా వై ఈశ్వరప్రహితేన తే । ఈశ్వరాయ నమశ్చక్రురహో దైవబలం బలమ్ ॥ ౨౯ ॥
rājṣā pītaṁ viditvā vai
[raajshaa peetam viditvaa vai]
īśvara-prahitena te
[eeshvara-prahitena te]
īśvarāya namaś cakrur
[eeshvaraaya namash chakrur]
aho daiva-balaṁ balam
[aho daiva-balam balam]
rājṣā — by the King pītam — drunk viditvā — understanding this vai — indeed īśvara-prahitena — inspired by providence te — all of them īśvarāya — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the supreme controller namaḥ cakruḥ — offered respectful obeisances aho — alas daiva-balam — providential power balam — is actual power.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājṣā pītaṁ viditvā vai
rājṣā
by the King
pītam
drunk
viditvā
understanding this
vai
indeed
īśvara-prahitena te
īśvara-prahitena
inspired by providence
te
all of them
īśvarāya namaś cakrur
īśvarāya
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the supreme controller
namaḥ cakruḥ
offered respectful obeisances
aho daiva-balaṁ balam
aho
alas
daiva-balam
providential power
balam
is actual power.
When the brāhmaṇas came to understand that the King, inspired by the supreme controller, had drunk the water, they all exclaimed “Alas! The power of providence is real power. No one can counteract the power of the Supreme.” In this way they offered their respectful obeisances unto the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the brāhmaṇas came to understand that the King, inspired by the supreme controller, had drunk the water, they all exclaimed "Alas! The power of providence is most powerful.” In this way they offered their respectful obeisances unto the Lord. They said, “The power of the Lord is most powerful.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.30

↗
తత: కాల ఉపావృత్తే కుక్షిం నిర్భిద్య దక్షిణమ్ । యువనాశ్వస్య తనయశ్చక్రవర్తీ జజాన హ ॥ ౩౦ ॥
tataḥ kāla upāvṛtte
[tatah kaala upaavritte]
kukṣiṁ nirbhidya dakṣiṇam
[kukshim nirbhidya dakshinam]
yuvanāśvasya tanayaś
[yuvanaashvasya tanayash]
cakravartī jajāna ha
[chakravartee jajaana ha]
tataḥ — thereafter kāle — time upāvṛtte — being mature kukṣim — the lower part of the abdomen nirbhidya — piercing dakṣiṇam — the right side yuvanāśvasya — of King Yuvanāśva tanayaḥ — a son cakravartī — with all the good symptoms of a king jajāna — generated ha — in the past.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ kāla upāvṛtte
tataḥ
thereafter
kāle
time
upāvṛtte
being mature
kukṣiṁ nirbhidya dakṣiṇam
kukṣim
the lower part of the abdomen
nirbhidya
piercing
dakṣiṇam
the right side
yuvanāśvasya tanayaś
yuvanāśvasya
of King Yuvanāśva
tanayaḥ
a son
cakravartī jajāna ha
cakravartī
with all the good symptoms of a king
jajāna
generated
ha
in the past.
Thereafter, in due course of time, a son with all the good symptoms of a powerful king came forth from the lower right side of King Yuvanāśva’s abdomen.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, in due course of time, a son with all the good symptoms of a powerful king came forth from the lower right side of King Yuvanāśva's abdomen.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.31

↗
కం ధాస్యతి కుమారోఽయం స్తన్యే రోరూయతే భృశమ్ । మాం ధాతా వత్స మా రోదీరితీన్ద్రో దేశినీమదాత్ ॥ ౩౧ ॥
kaṁ dhāsyati kumāro ’yaṁ
[kam dhaasyati kumaaro ’yam]
stanye rorūyate bhṛśam
[stanye rorooyate bhrisham]
māṁ dhātā vatsa mā rodīr
[maam dhaataa vatsa maa rodeer]
itīndro deśinīm adāt
[iteendro deshineem adaat]
kam — by whom dhāsyati — will he be cared for by being supplied breast milk kumāraḥ — child ayam — this stanye — for drinking breast milk rorūyate — is crying bhṛśam — so much mām dhātā — just drink me vatsa — my dear child mā rodīḥ — do not cry iti — thus indraḥ — King Indra deśinīm — the index finger adāt — gave him to suck.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaṁ dhāsyati kumāro ’yaṁ
kam
by whom
dhāsyati
will he be cared for by being supplied breast milk
kumāraḥ
child
ayam
this
stanye rorūyate bhṛśam
stanye
for drinking breast milk
rorūyate
is crying
bhṛśam
so much
māṁ dhātā vatsa mā rodīr
mām dhātā
just drink me
vatsa
my dear child
mā rodīḥ
do not cry
itīndro deśinīm adāt
iti
thus
indraḥ
King Indra
deśinīm
the index finger
adāt
gave him to suck.
The baby cried so much for breast milk that all the brāhmaṇas were very unhappy. “Who will take care of this baby?” they said. Then Indra, who was worshiped in that yajṣa, came and solaced the baby. “Do not cry,” Indra said. Then Indra put his index finger in the baby’s mouth and said, “You may drink me.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"Who will take care of this baby?" they said. Then Indra, who was worshiped in that sacrifice, came and solaced the baby. "Do not cry," Indra said. Then Indra put his index finger in the baby's mouth and said, "You may drink me." The brāhmaṇas said, “Who will feed the child?” Then Indra, who was worshipped in the sacrifice, appeared. He said, “Drink me (māṁ dhātā). Do not cry.” He put his forefinger in the child’s mouth.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.32

↗
న మమార పితా తస్య విప్రదేవప్రసాదత: । యువనాశ్వోఽథ తత్రైవ తపసా సిద్ధిమన్వగాత్ ॥ ౩౨ ॥
na mamāra pitā tasya
[na mamaara pitaa tasya]
vipra-deva-prasādataḥ
[vipra-deva-prasaadatah]
yuvanāśvo ’tha tatraiva
[yuvanaashvo ’tha tatraiva]
tapasā siddhim anvagāt
[tapasaa siddhim anvagaat]
na — not mamāra — died pitā — the father tasya — of the baby vipra-deva-prasādataḥ — because of the mercy and blessings of the brāhmaṇas yuvanāśvaḥ — King Yuvanāśva atha — thereafter tatra eva — in that very place tapasā — by executing austerity siddhim — perfection anvagāt — achieved.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na mamāra pitā tasya
na
not
mamāra
died
pitā
the father
tasya
of the baby
vipra-deva-prasādataḥ
vipra-deva-prasādataḥ
because of the mercy and blessings of the brāhmaṇas
yuvanāśvo ’tha tatraiva
yuvanāśvaḥ
King Yuvanāśva
atha
thereafter
tatra eva
in that very place
tapasā siddhim anvagāt
tapasā
by executing austerity
siddhim
perfection
anvagāt
achieved.
Because Yuvanāśva, the father of the baby, was blessed by the brāhmaṇas, he did not fall a victim to death. After this incident, he performed severe austerities and achieved perfection in that very spot.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because Yuvanāśva, the father of the baby, was blessed by the brāhmaṇas, he did not fall a victim to death. After this incident, he performed severe austerities and achieved perfection in that very spot.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.33-34

↗
త్రసద్దస్యురితీన్ద్రోఽఙ్గ విదధే నామ యస్య వై । యస్మాత్ త్రసన్తి హ్యుద్విగ్నా దస్యవో రావణాదయ: ॥ ౩౩ ॥ యౌవనాశ్వోఽథ మాన్ధాతా చక్రవర్త్యవనీం ప్రభు: । సప్తద్వీపవతీమేక: శశాసాచ్యుతతేజసా ॥ ౩౪ ॥
trasaddasyur itīndro ’ṅga
[trasaddasyur iteendro ’nga]
vidadhe nāma yasya vai
[vidadhe naama yasya vai]
yasmāt trasanti hy udvignā
[yasmaat trasanti hy udvignaa]
dasyavo rāvaṇādayaḥ
[dasyavo raavanaadayah]
yauvanāśvo ’tha māndhātā
[yauvanaashvo ’tha maandhaataa]
cakravarty avanīṁ prabhuḥ
[chakravarty avaneem prabhuh]
sapta-dvīpavatīm ekaḥ
[sapta-dveepavateem ekah]
śaśāsācyuta-tejasā
[shashaasaachyuta-tejasaa]
trasat-dasyuḥ — of the name Trasaddasyu (“one who threatens thieves and rogues”) iti — thus indraḥ — the King of heaven aṅga — my dear King vidadhe — gave nāma — the name yasya — whom vai — indeed yasmāt — from whom trasanti — are afraid hi — indeed udvignāḥ — the cause of anxiety dasyavaḥ — thieves and rogues rāvaṇa-ādayaḥ — headed by great Rākṣasas like Rāvaṇa yauvanāśvaḥ — the son of Yuvanāśva atha — thus māndhātā — known as Māndhātā cakravartī — the emperor of the world avanīm — this surface of the world prabhuḥ — the master sapta-dvīpa-vatīm — consisting of seven islands ekaḥ — one alone śaśāsa — ruled acyuta-tejasā — being powerful by the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
trasaddasyur itīndro ’ṅga
trasat-dasyuḥ
of the name Trasaddasyu (“one who threatens thieves and rogues”)
iti
thus
indraḥ
the King of heaven
vidadhe nāma yasya vai
yasmāt trasanti hy udvignā
aṅga
my dear King
vidadhe
gave
nāma
the name
dasyavo rāvaṇādayaḥ
yasya
whom
vai
indeed
yasmāt
from whom
trasanti
are afraid
hi
indeed
udvignāḥ
the cause of anxiety
dasyavaḥ
thieves and rogues
yauvanāśvo ’tha māndhātā
cakravarty avanīṁ prabhuḥ
rāvaṇa-ādayaḥ
headed by great Rākṣasas like Rāvaṇa
yauvanāśvaḥ
the son of Yuvanāśva
sapta-dvīpavatīm ekaḥ
atha
thus
māndhātā
known as Māndhātā
cakravartī
the emperor of the world
avanīm
this surface of the world
prabhuḥ
the master
śaśāsācyuta-tejasā
sapta-dvīpa-vatīm
consisting of seven islands
ekaḥ
one alone
śaśāsa
ruled
acyuta-tejasā
being powerful by the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Māndhātā, the son of Yuvanāśva, was the cause of fear for Rāvaṇa and other thieves and rogues who caused anxiety. O King Parīkṣit, because they feared him, the son of Yuvanāśva was known as Trasaddasyu. This name was given by King Indra. By the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the son of Yuvanāśva was so powerful that when he became emperor he ruled the entire world, consisting of seven islands, without any second ruler.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit! Māndhātā, the son of Yuvanāśva, the cause of fear for Rāvaṇa and other criminals who caused anxiety, was known as Trasaddasyu (giving fear to the criminals). This name was given by King Indra. By the power of the Supreme Lord, the powerful son of Yuvanāśva, called Māndhātā, became the emperor and alone ruled the entire world, consisting of seven islands.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.35-36

↗
ఈజే చ యజ్ఞం క్రతుభిరాత్మవిద్ భూరిదక్షిణై: । సర్వదేవమయం దేవం సర్వాత్మకమతీన్ద్రియమ్ ॥ ౩౫ ॥ ద్రవ్యం మన్త్రో విధిర్యజ్ఞో యజమానస్తథర్త్విజ: । ధర్మో దేశశ్చ కాలశ్చ సర్వమేతద్ యదాత్మకమ్ ॥ ౩౬ ॥
īje ca yajṣaṁ kratubhir
[eeje cha yajsham kratubhir]
ātma-vid bhūri-dakṣiṇaiḥ
[aatma-vid bhoori-dakshinaih]
sarva-devamayaṁ devaṁ
[sarva-devamayam devam]
sarvātmakam atīndriyam
[sarvaatmakam ateendriyam]
dravyaṁ mantro vidhir yajṣo
[dravyam mantro vidhir yajsho]
yajamānas tathartvijaḥ
[yajamaanas tathartvijah]
dharmo deśaś ca kālaś ca
[dharmo deshash cha kaalash cha]
sarvam etad yad ātmakam
[sarvam etad yad aatmakam]
īje — he worshiped ca — also yajṣam — the Lord of sacrifices kratubhiḥ — by great ritualistic performances ātma-vit — fully conscious by self-realization bhūri-dakṣiṇaiḥ — by giving large contributions to the brāhmaṇas sarva-deva-mayam — consisting of all the demigods devam — the Lord sarva-ātmakam — the Supersoul of everyone ati-indriyam — transcendentally situated dravyam — ingredients mantraḥ — chanting of the Vedic hymns vidhiḥ — regulative principles yajṣaḥ — worshiping yajamānaḥ — the performer tathā — with ṛtvijaḥ — the priests dharmaḥ — religious principles deśaḥ — the country ca — and kālaḥ — the time ca — also sarvam — everything etat — all these yat — that which is ātmakam — favorable for self-realization.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
īje ca yajṣaṁ kratubhir
īje
he worshiped
ca
also
yajṣam
the Lord of sacrifices
kratubhiḥ
by great ritualistic performances
ātma-vid bhūri-dakṣiṇaiḥ
ātma-vit
fully conscious by self-realization
bhūri-dakṣiṇaiḥ
by giving large contributions to the brāhmaṇas
sarva-devamayaṁ devaṁ
sarva-deva-mayam
consisting of all the demigods
devam
the Lord
sarvātmakam atīndriyam
sarva-ātmakam
the Supersoul of everyone
ati-indriyam
transcendentally situated
dravyam
ingredients
dravyaṁ mantro vidhir yajṣo
mantraḥ
chanting of the Vedic hymns
vidhiḥ
regulative principles
yajṣaḥ
worshiping
yajamānas tathartvijaḥ
yajamānaḥ
the performer
tathā
with
ṛtvijaḥ
the priests
dharmo deśaś ca kālaś ca
dharmaḥ
religious principles
deśaḥ
the country
ca
and
kālaḥ
the time
ca
also
sarvam etad yad ātmakam
sarvam
everything
etat
all these
yat
that which is
ātmakam
favorable for self-realization.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead is not different from the auspicious aspects of great sacrifices, such as the ingredients of the sacrifice, the chanting of Vedic hymns, the regulative principles, the performer, the priests, the result of the sacrifice, the arena of sacrifice, and the time of sacrifice. Knowing the principles of self-realization, Māndhātā worshiped that transcendentally situated Supreme Soul, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Viṣṇu, who comprises all the demigods. He also gave immense charity to the brāhmaṇas, and thus he performed yajṣa to worship the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By performance of sacrifice with plentiful donations, Māndhātā, knower of the Lord, worshipped the Lord who is beyond the senses, who represents all devatās, who is the soul of all beings, who is non-different from sacrifice, and who is non-different from its ingredients, its mantras, its rules, its sponsor, its priests, its results, its time and its place.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.37

↗
యావత్ సూర్య ఉదేతి స్మ యావచ్చ ప్రతితిష్ఠతి । తత్ సర్వం యౌవనాశ్వస్య మాన్ధాతు: క్షేత్రముచ్యతే ॥ ౩౭ ॥
yāvat sūrya udeti sma
[yaavat soorya udeti sma]
yāvac ca pratitiṣṭhati
[yaavach cha pratitishthati]
tat sarvaṁ yauvanāśvasya
[tat sarvam yauvanaashvasya]
māndhātuḥ kṣetram ucyate
[maandhaatuh kshetram uchyate]
yāvat — as long as sūryaḥ — the sun udeti — has risen on the horizon sma — in the past yāvat — as long as ca — also pratitiṣṭhati — continues to stay tat — all those things mentioned above sarvam — everything yauvanāśvasya — of the son of Yuvanāśva māndhātuḥ — called Māndhātā kṣetram — location ucyate — is said to be.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yāvat sūrya udeti sma
yāvat
as long as
sūryaḥ
the sun
udeti
has risen on the horizon
sma
in the past
yāvac ca pratitiṣṭhati
yāvat
as long as
ca
also
pratitiṣṭhati
continues to stay
tat sarvaṁ yauvanāśvasya
tat
all those things mentioned above
sarvam
everything
yauvanāśvasya
of the son of Yuvanāśva
māndhātuḥ kṣetram ucyate
māndhātuḥ
called Māndhātā
kṣetram
location
ucyate
is said to be.
All places, from where the sun rises on the horizon, shining brilliantly, to where the sun sets, are known as the possession of the celebrated Māndhātā, the son of Yuvanāśva.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
All places, from where the sun rises to where the sun sets, are known as the land Māndhātā, the son of Yuvanāśva. Pratitiṣṭhati means “sets.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.38

↗
శశబిన్దోర్దుహితరి బిన్దుమత్యామధాన్నృప: । పురుకుత్సమమ్బరీషం ముచుకున్దం చ యోగినమ్ । తేషాం స్వసార: పఞ్చాశత్ సౌభరిం వవ్రిరే పతిమ్ ॥ ౩౮ ॥
śaśabindor duhitari
[shashabindor duhitari]
bindumatyām adhān nṛpaḥ
[bindumatyaam adhaan nripah]
purukutsam ambarīṣaṁ
[purukutsam ambareesham]
mucukundaṁ ca yoginam
[muchukundam cha yoginam]
teṣāṁ svasāraḥ paṣcāśat
[teshaam svasaarah pashchaashat]
saubhariṁ vavrire patim
[saubharim vavrire patim]
śaśabindoḥ — of a king known as Śaśabindu duhitari — unto the daughter bindumatyām — whose name was Bindumatī adhāt — begot nṛpaḥ — the King (Māndhātā) purukutsam — Purukutsa ambarīṣam — Ambarīṣa mucukundam — Mucukunda ca — and yoginam — a highly elevated mystic teṣām — of them svasāraḥ — the sisters paṣcāśat — fifty saubharim — unto the great sage Saubhari vavrire — accepted patim — as husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaśabindor duhitari
śaśabindoḥ
of a king known as Śaśabindu
duhitari
unto the daughter
bindumatyām adhān nṛpaḥ
bindumatyām
whose name was Bindumatī
adhāt
begot
nṛpaḥ
the King (Māndhātā)
purukutsam ambarīṣaṁ
purukutsam
Purukutsa
ambarīṣam
Ambarīṣa
mucukundaṁ ca yoginam
mucukundam
Mucukunda
ca
and
yoginam
a highly elevated mystic
teṣāṁ svasāraḥ paṣcāśat
teṣām
of them
svasāraḥ
the sisters
paṣcāśat
fifty
saubhariṁ vavrire patim
saubharim
unto the great sage Saubhari
vavrire
accepted
patim
as husband.
Māndhātā begot three sons in the womb of Bindumatī, the daughter of Śaśabindu. These sons were Purukutsa, Ambarīṣa, and Mucukunda, a great mystic yogī. These three brothers had fifty sisters, who all accepted the great sage Saubhari as their husband.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Māndhātā begot three sons in the womb of Bindumatī, the daughter of Śaśabindu. These sons were Purukutsa, Ambarīṣa, and Mucukunda, a great mystic yogī. These three brothers had fifty sisters, who all accepted the great sage Saubhari as their husband.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.39-40

↗
యమునాన్తర్జలే మగ్నస్తప్యమాన: పరన్తప: । నిర్వృతిం మీనరాజస్య ద‍ృష్ట్వా మైథునధర్మిణ: ॥ ౩౯ ॥ జాతస్పృహో నృపం విప్ర: కన్యామేకామయాచత । సోఽప్యాహ గృహ్యతాం బ్రహ్మన్ కామం కన్యా స్వయంవరే ॥ ౪౦ ॥
yamunāntar-jale magnas
[yamunaantar-jale magnas]
tapyamānaḥ paraṁ tapaḥ
[tapyamaanah param tapah]
nirvṛtiṁ mīna-rājasya
[nirvritim meena-raajasya]
dṛṣṭvā maithuna-dharmiṇaḥ
[drishtvaa maithuna-dharminah]
jāta-spṛho nṛpaṁ vipraḥ
[jaata-spriho nripam viprah]
kanyām ekām ayācata
[kanyaam ekaam ayaachata]
so ’py āha gṛhyatāṁ brahman
[so ’py aaha grihyataam brahman]
kāmaṁ kanyā svayaṁvare
[kaamam kanyaa svayamvare]
yamunā-antaḥ-jale — in the deep water of the river Yamunā magnaḥ — merged completely tapyamānaḥ — executing austerities param — uncommon tapaḥ — austerity nirvṛtim — pleasure mīna-rājasya — of a big fish dṛṣṭvā — seeing maithuna-dharmiṇaḥ — engaged in sexual affairs jāta-spṛhaḥ — became sexually inclined nṛpam — unto the King (Māndhātā) vipraḥ — the brāhmaṇa (Saubhari Ṛṣi) kanyām ekām — one daughter ayācata — begged for saḥ — he, the King api — also āha — said gṛhyatām — you can take brahman — O brāhmaṇa kāmam — as she desires kanyā — daughter svayaṁvare — a personal selection.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yamunāntar-jale magnas
yamunā-antaḥ-jale
in the deep water of the river Yamunā
magnaḥ
merged completely
tapyamānaḥ paraṁ tapaḥ
tapyamānaḥ
executing austerities
param
uncommon
tapaḥ
austerity
nirvṛtiṁ mīna-rājasya
nirvṛtim
pleasure
mīna-rājasya
of a big fish
dṛṣṭvā maithuna-dharmiṇaḥ
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
maithuna-dharmiṇaḥ
engaged in sexual affairs
jāta-spṛho nṛpaṁ vipraḥ
jāta-spṛhaḥ
became sexually inclined
nṛpam
unto the King (Māndhātā)
vipraḥ
the brāhmaṇa (Saubhari Ṛṣi)
kanyām ekām ayācata
kanyām ekām
one daughter
ayācata
begged for
saḥ
he, the King
api
also
so ’py āha gṛhyatāṁ brahman
āha
said
gṛhyatām
you can take
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
kāmaṁ kanyā svayaṁvare
kāmam
as she desires
kanyā
daughter
svayaṁvare
a personal selection.
Saubhari Ṛṣi was engaged in austerity, deep in the water of the river Yamunā, when he saw a pair of fish engaged in sexual affairs. Thus he perceived the pleasure of sex life, and induced by this desire he went to King Māndhātā and begged for one of the King’s daughters. In response to this request, the King said, “O brāhmaṇa, any of my daughters may accept any husband according to her personal selection.”

This is the beginning of the story of Saubhari Ṛṣi. According to Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, Māndhātā was the king of Mathurā, and Saubhari Ṛṣi was engaged in austerity while submerged deep within the river Yamunā. When the ṛṣi felt sexual desire, he emerged from the water and went to King Māndhātā to ask that one of the King’s daughters become his wife.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Saubhari was engaged in austerity in the water of the River Yamunā, when he saw the pleasure of a big fish engaged in sexual affairs. When desire appeared in him, he went to King Māndhātā and begged for one of the King's daughters. In response to this request, the King said, "O brāhmaṇa, any of my daughters may accept any husband according to her personal selection." ‘Why did the sage Saubhari performing great austerities, marry these daughters and why did the daughters accept an old withered sage as their husband?” After seeing the fish, he came out of the water, went to Mathurā and requested King Māndhātā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.41-42

↗
స విచిన్త్యాప్రియం స్త్రీణాం జరఠోఽహమసన్మత: । వలీపలిత ఏజత్క ఇత్యహం ప్రత్యుదాహృత: ॥ ౪౧ ॥ సాధయిష్యే తథాత్మానం సురస్త్రీణామభీప్సితమ్ । కిం పునర్మనుజేన్ద్రాణామితి వ్యవసిత: ప్రభు: ॥ ౪౨ ॥
sa vicintyāpriyaṁ strīṇāṁ
[sa vichintyaapriyam streenaam]
jaraṭho ’ham asan-mataḥ
[jaratho ’ham asan-matah]
valī-palita ejat-ka
[valee-palita ejat-ka]
ity ahaṁ pratyudāhṛtaḥ
[ity aham pratyudaahritah]
sādhayiṣye tathātmānaṁ
[saadhayishye tathaatmaanam]
sura-strīṇām abhīpsitam
[sura-streenaam abheepsitam]
kiṁ punar manujendrāṇām
[kim punar manujendraanaam]
iti vyavasitaḥ prabhuḥ
[iti vyavasitah prabhuh]
saḥ — he, Saubhari Muni vicintya — thinking to himself apriyam — not liked strīṇām — by the women jaraṭhaḥ — being infirm because of old age aham — I asat-mataḥ — not desired by them valī — wrinkled palitaḥ — grey-haired ejat-kaḥ — with the head always trembling iti — in this way aham — I pratyudāhṛtaḥ — rejected (by them) sādhayiṣye — I shall act in such a way tathā — as ātmānam — my body sura-strīṇām — to the celestial women of the heavenly planets abhīpsitam — desirable kim — what to speak of punaḥ — yet manuja-indrāṇām — of the daughters of worldly kings iti — in this way vyavasitaḥ — determined prabhuḥ — Saubhari, the greatly powerful mystic.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vicintyāpriyaṁ strīṇāṁ
saḥ
he, Saubhari Muni
vicintya
thinking to himself
apriyam
not liked
strīṇām
by the women
jaraṭho ’ham asan-mataḥ
jaraṭhaḥ
being infirm because of old age
aham
I
valī-palita ejat-ka
ity ahaṁ pratyudāhṛtaḥ
sādhayiṣye tathātmānaṁ
sura-strīṇām abhīpsitam
asat-mataḥ
not desired by them
kiṁ punar manujendrāṇām
iti vyavasitaḥ prabhuḥ
valī
wrinkled
palitaḥ
grey-haired
ejat-kaḥ
with the head always trembling
iti
in this way
aham
I
pratyudāhṛtaḥ
rejected (by them)
sādhayiṣye
I shall act in such a way
tathā
as
ātmānam
my body
sura-strīṇām
to the celestial women of the heavenly planets
abhīpsitam
desirable
kim
what to speak of
punaḥ
yet
manuja-indrāṇām
of the daughters of worldly kings
iti
in this way
vyavasitaḥ
determined
prabhuḥ
Saubhari, the greatly powerful mystic.
Saubhari Muni thought: I am now feeble because of old age. My hair has become grey, my skin is slack, and my head always trembles. Besides, I am a yogī. Therefore women do not like me. Since the King has thus rejected me, I shall reform my body in such a way as to be desirable even to celestial women, what to speak of the daughters of worldly kings.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Saubhari thought: I am now feeble because of old age. My hair has become grey, my skin is wrinkled, and my head always trembles. Therefore women do not like me. Thus I have been rejected. I shall reform my body in such a way as to be desirable even to celestial women, what to speak of the daughters of worldly kings. In this way the powerful Saubhari decided. My head trembles (ejatkaḥ). I have been refused (pratyudāhṛtaḥ) by the King. Then he decided (vyavasitaḥ) to change his body.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.43

↗
ముని: ప్రవేశిత: క్షత్రా కన్యాన్త:పురమృద్ధిమత్ । వృత: స రాజకన్యాభిరేకం పఞ్చాశతా వర: ॥ ౪౩ ॥
muniḥ praveśitaḥ kṣatrā
[munih praveshitah kshatraa]
kanyāntaḥpuram ṛddhimat
[kanyaantahpuram riddhimat]
vṛtaḥ sa rāja-kanyābhir
[vritah sa raaja-kanyaabhir]
ekaṁ paṣcāśatā varaḥ
[ekam pashchaashataa varah]
muniḥ — Saubhari Muni praveśitaḥ — admitted kṣatrā — by the palace messenger kanyā-antaḥpuram — into the residential quarters of the princesses ṛddhi-mat — extremely opulent in all respects vṛtaḥ — accepted saḥ — he rāja-kanyābhiḥ — by all the princesses ekam — he alone paṣcāśatā — by all fifty varaḥ — the husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
muniḥ praveśitaḥ kṣatrā
muniḥ
Saubhari Muni
praveśitaḥ
admitted
kṣatrā
by the palace messenger
kanyāntaḥpuram ṛddhimat
kanyā-antaḥpuram
into the residential quarters of the princesses
ṛddhi-mat
extremely opulent in all respects
vṛtaḥ sa rāja-kanyābhir
vṛtaḥ
accepted
saḥ
he
rāja-kanyābhiḥ
by all the princesses
ekaṁ paṣcāśatā varaḥ
ekam
he alone
paṣcāśatā
by all fifty
varaḥ
the husband.
Thereafter, when Saubhari Muni became quite a young and beautiful person, the messenger of the palace took him inside the residential quarters of the princesses, which were extremely opulent. All fifty princesses then accepted him as their husband, although he was only one man.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, the messenger of the palace took him inside the residential quarters of the princesses, full of splendor. All fifty princesses then accepted him as their husband, although he was only one man.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.44

↗
తాసాం కలిరభూద్ భూయాంస్తదర్థేఽపోహ్య సౌహృదమ్ । మమానురూపో నాయం వ ఇతి తద్గతచేతసామ్ ॥ ౪౪ ॥
tāsāṁ kalir abhūd bhūyāṁs
[taasaam kalir abhood bhooyaams]
tad-arthe ’pohya sauhṛdam
[tad-arthe ’pohya sauhridam]
mamānurūpo nāyaṁ va
[mamaanuroopo naayam va]
iti tad-gata-cetasām
[iti tad-gata-chetasaam]
tāsām — of all the princesses kaliḥ — disagreement and quarrel abhūt — there was bhūyān — very much tat-arthe — for the sake of Saubhari Muni apohya — giving up sauhṛdam — a good relationship mama — mine anurūpaḥ — the fit person na — not ayam — this vaḥ — yours iti — in this way tat-gata-cetasām — being attracted by him.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāsāṁ kalir abhūd bhūyāṁs
tāsām
of all the princesses
kaliḥ
disagreement and quarrel
abhūt
there was
bhūyān
very much
tad-arthe ’pohya sauhṛdam
tat-arthe
for the sake of Saubhari Muni
apohya
giving up
sauhṛdam
a good relationship
mamānurūpo nāyaṁ va
mama
mine
anurūpaḥ
the fit person
na
not
ayam
this
vaḥ
yours
iti tad-gata-cetasām
iti
in this way
tat-gata-cetasām
being attracted by him.
Thereafter, the princesses, being attracted by Saubhari Muni, gave up their sisterly relationship and quarreled among themselves, each one of them contending, “This man is just suitable for me, and not for you.” In this way there ensued a great disagreement.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, the princesses, being attracted by Saubhari, gave up their sisterly relationship and quarreled among themselves over him, each one of them contending, "This man is just suitable for me, and not for you."
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.45-46

↗
స బహ్వఋచస్తాభిరపారణీయ- తప:శ్రియానర్ఘ్యపరిచ్ఛదేషు । గృహేషు నానోపవనామలామ్భ:- సరస్సు సౌగన్ధికకాననేషు ॥ ౪౫ ॥ మహార్హశయ్యాసనవస్త్రభూషణ- స్‍నానానులేపాభ్యవహారమాల్యకై: । స్వలఙ్‍కృత స్త్రీపురుషేషు నిత్యదా రేమేఽనుగాయద్ద్విజభృఙ్గవన్దిషు ॥ ౪౬ ॥
sa bahv-ṛcas tābhir apāraṇīya-
[sa bahv-richas taabhir apaaraneeya-]
tapaḥ-śriyānarghya-paricchadeṣu
[tapah-shriyaanarghya-parichchadeshu]
gṛheṣu nānopavanāmalāmbhaḥ-
[griheshu naanopavanaamalaambhah-]
saraḥsu saugandhika-kānaneṣu
[sarahsu saugandhika-kaananeshu]
mahārha-śayyāsana-vastra-bhūṣaṇa-
[mahaarha-shayyaasana-vastra-bhooshana-]
snānānulepābhyavahāra-mālyakaiḥ
[snaanaanulepaabhyavahaara-maalyakaih]
svalaṅkṛta-strī-puruṣeṣu nityadā
[svalankrita-stree-purusheshu nityadaa]
reme ’nugāyad-dvija-bhṛṅga-vandiṣu
[reme ’nugaayad-dvija-bhringa-vandishu]
saḥ — he, Saubhari Ṛṣi bahu-ṛcaḥ — quite expert in utilizing Vedic mantras tābhiḥ — with his wives apāraṇīya — unlimited tapaḥ — the result of austerity śriyā — by opulences anarghya — paraphernalia for enjoyment paricchadeṣu — equipped with different garments and dresses gṛheṣu — in the house and rooms nānā — varieties of upavana — parks amala — clean ambhaḥ — water saraḥsu — in lakes saugandhika — very fragrant kānaneṣu — in gardens mahā-arha — very costly śayyā — bedding āsana — sitting places vastra — clothing bhūṣaṇa — ornaments snāna — bathing places anulepa — sandalwood abhyavahāra — palatable dishes mālyakaiḥ — and with garlands su-alaṅkṛta — properly dressed and decorated strī — women puruṣeṣu — with men also nityadā — constantly reme — enjoyed anugāyat — followed by the singing of dvija — birds bhṛṅga — bumblebees vandiṣu — and professional singers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa bahv-ṛcas tābhir apāraṇīya-
saḥ
he, Saubhari Ṛṣi
bahu-ṛcaḥ
quite expert in utilizing Vedic mantras
tābhiḥ
with his wives
apāraṇīya
unlimited
tapaḥ-śriyānarghya-paricchadeṣu
tapaḥ
the result of austerity
śriyā
by opulences
anarghya
paraphernalia for enjoyment
paricchadeṣu
equipped with different garments and dresses
gṛheṣu nānopavanāmalāmbhaḥ-
gṛheṣu
in the house and rooms
nānā
varieties of
upavana
parks
amala
clean
ambhaḥ
water
saraḥsu saugandhika-kānaneṣu
saraḥsu
in lakes
saugandhika
very fragrant
kānaneṣu
in gardens
mahārha-śayyāsana-vastra-bhūṣaṇa-
mahā-arha
very costly
śayyā
bedding
āsana
sitting places
vastra
clothing
bhūṣaṇa
ornaments
snānānulepābhyavahāra-mālyakaiḥ
snāna
bathing places
anulepa
sandalwood
abhyavahāra
palatable dishes
mālyakaiḥ
and with garlands
svalaṅkṛta-strī-puruṣeṣu nityadā
su-alaṅkṛta
properly dressed and decorated
strī
women
puruṣeṣu
with men also
nityadā
constantly
reme ’nugāyad-dvija-bhṛṅga-vandiṣu
reme
enjoyed
anugāyat
followed by the singing of
dvija
birds
bhṛṅga
bumblebees
vandiṣu
and professional singers.
Because Saubhari Muni was expert in chanting mantras perfectly, his severe austerities resulted in an opulent home, with garments, ornaments, properly dressed and decorated maidservants and manservants, and varieties of parks with clear-water lakes and gardens. In the gardens, fragrant with varieties of flowers, birds chirped and bees hummed, surrounded by professional singers. Saubhari Muni’s home was amply provided with valuable beds, seats, ornaments, and arrangements for bathing, and there were varieties of sandalwood creams, flower garlands, and palatable dishes. Thus surrounded by opulent paraphernalia, the muni engaged in family affairs with his numerous wives.

Saubhari Ṛṣi was a great yogī. Yogic perfection makes available eight material opulences — aṇimā, laghimā, mahimā, prāpti, prākāmya, īśitva, vaśitva and kāmāvasāyitā. Saubhari Muni exhibited superexcellence in material enjoyment by dint of his yogic perfection. The word bahv-ṛca means “expert in chanting mantras. ” As material opulence can be achieved by ordinary material means, it can also be achieved by subtle means through mantras. By chanting mantras, Saubhari Muni arranged for material opulence, but this was not perfection in life. As will be seen, Saubhari Muni became very dissatisfied with material opulence and thus left everything and reentered the forest in the vānaprastha order and achieved final success. Those who are not ātma-tattva-vit, who do not know the spiritual value of life, can be satisfied with external material opulences, but those who are ātma-tattva-vit are not inspired by material opulence. This is the instruction we can derive from the life and activities of Saubhari Muni.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because Saubhari was expert in chanting mantras perfectly, he enjoyed with his wives in luxurious homes, valuable furniture, fragrant gardens with lakes of clear water and parks, with garlands, palatable food, cosmetics, baths, ornaments, clothing, seats and valuable beds, along with other men and women, all created by his impossible austerities, while birds, bees and bards sang. Bahvṛcaḥ means that he had powers from mantras to create his wealth. He had performed austerities impossible for others (apāraṇīya-tapaḥ). He enjoyed in houses, and even cities with great wealth, created by his austerity.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.47

↗
యద్గార్హస్థ్యం తు సంవీక్ష్య సప్తద్వీపవతీపతి: । విస్మిత: స్తమ్భమజహాత్ సార్వభౌమశ్రియాన్వితమ్ ॥ ౪౭ ॥
yad-gārhasthyaṁ tu saṁvīkṣya
[yad-gaarhasthyam tu samveekshya]
sapta-dvīpavatī-patiḥ
[sapta-dveepavatee-patih]
vismitaḥ stambham ajahāt
[vismitah stambham ajahaat]
sārvabhauma-śriyānvitam
[saarvabhauma-shriyaanvitam]
yat — he whose gārhasthyam — family life, householder life tu — but saṁvīkṣya — observing sapta-dvīpa-vatī-patiḥ — Māndhātā, who was the King of the entire world, consisting of seven islands vismitaḥ — was struck with wonder stambham — pride due to a prestigious position ajahāt — he gave up sārva-bhauma — the emperor of the entire world śriyā-anvitam — blessed with all kinds of opulence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad-gārhasthyaṁ tu saṁvīkṣya
yat
he whose
gārhasthyam
family life, householder life
tu
but
saṁvīkṣya
observing
sapta-dvīpavatī-patiḥ
sapta-dvīpa-vatī-patiḥ
Māndhātā, who was the King of the entire world, consisting of seven islands
vismitaḥ
was struck with wonder
vismitaḥ stambham ajahāt
stambham
pride due to a prestigious position
ajahāt
he gave up
sārvabhauma-śriyānvitam
sārva-bhauma
the emperor of the entire world
śriyā-anvitam
blessed with all kinds of opulence.
Māndhātā, the King of the entire world, consisting of seven islands, was struck with wonder when he saw the household opulence of Saubhari Muni. Thus he gave up his false prestige in his position as emperor of the world.

Everyone is proud of his own position, but here was an astounding experience, in which the emperor of the entire world felt himself defeated in all details of material happiness by the opulence of Saubhari Muni.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Māndhātā, the king of the entire world consisting of seven islands, was struck with wonder when he saw the household opulence of Saubhari. Thus he gave up his false prestige for his wealth and power. Stambham means pride.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.48

↗
ఏవం గృహేష్వభిరతో విషయాన్ వివిధై: సుఖై: । సేవమానో న చాతుష్యదాజ్యస్తోకైరివానల: ॥ ౪౮ ॥
evaṁ gṛheṣv abhirato
[evam griheshv abhirato]
viṣayān vividhaiḥ sukhaiḥ
[vishayaan vividhaih sukhaih]
sevamāno na cātuṣyad
[sevamaano na chaatushyad]
ājya-stokair ivānalaḥ
[aajya-stokair ivaanalah]
evam — in this way gṛheṣu — in household affairs abhirataḥ — being always engaged viṣayān — material paraphernalia vividhaiḥ — with varieties of sukhaiḥ — happiness sevamānaḥ — enjoying na — not ca — also atuṣyat — satisfied him ājya-stokaiḥ — by drops of fat iva — like analaḥ — a fire.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ gṛheṣv abhirato
evam
in this way
gṛheṣu
in household affairs
abhirataḥ
being always engaged
viṣayān vividhaiḥ sukhaiḥ
viṣayān
material paraphernalia
vividhaiḥ
with varieties of
sukhaiḥ
happiness
sevamāno na cātuṣyad
sevamānaḥ
enjoying
na
not
ca
also
atuṣyat
satisfied him
ājya-stokair ivānalaḥ
ājya-stokaiḥ
by drops of fat
iva
like
analaḥ
a fire.
In this way, Saubhari Muni enjoyed sense gratification in the material world, but he was not at all satisfied, just as a fire never ceases blazing if constantly supplied with drops of fat.

Material desire is just like a blazing fire. If a fire is continually supplied with drops of fat, the fire will increase more and more and never be extinguished. Therefore the policy of trying to satisfy material desires by catering to one’s material demands will never be successful. In modern civilization, everyone is engaged in economic development, which is another way of constantly dropping fat into the material fire. The Western countries have reached the summit of material civilization, but people are still dissatisfied. Real satisfaction is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (5.29) , where Kṛṣṇa says:

bhoktāraṁ yajṣa-tapasāṁ sarva-loka-maheśvaram suhṛdaṁ sarva-bhūtānāṁ jṣātvā māṁ śāntim ṛcchati

“The sages who knows Me as the ultimate purpose of all sacrifices and austerities, the Supreme Lord of all planets and demigods and the benefactor and well-wisher of all living entities attains peace from the pangs of material miseries.” One must therefore take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness and advance in Kṛṣṇa consciousness by properly following the regulative principles. Then one can attain an eternal, blissful life in peace and knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way, Saubhari, attached to family life, enjoyed sense objects by various types of happiness, but he was not at all satisfied, just as a fire never ceases to blaze if constantly supplied with drops of ghee. Stokaiḥ means “by drops.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.49

↗
స కదాచిదుపాసీన ఆత్మాపహ్నవమాత్మన: । దదర్శ బహ్వృచాచార్యో మీనసఙ్గసముత్థితమ్ ॥ ౪౯ ॥
sa kadācid upāsīna
[sa kadaachid upaaseena]
ātmāpahnavam ātmanaḥ
[aatmaapahnavam aatmanah]
dadarśa bahv-ṛcācāryo
[dadarsha bahv-richaachaaryo]
mīna-saṅga-samutthitam
[meena-sanga-samutthitam]
saḥ — he, Saubhari Muni kadācit — one day upāsīnaḥ — sitting down ātma-apahnavam — degrading oneself from the platform of tapasya ātmanaḥ — self-caused dadarśa — observed bahu-ṛca-ācāryaḥ — Saubhari Muni, who was expert in chanting mantras mīna-saṅga — the sexual affairs of fish samutthitam — caused by this incident.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa kadācid upāsīna
saḥ
he, Saubhari Muni
kadācit
one day
upāsīnaḥ
sitting down
ātmāpahnavam ātmanaḥ
ātma-apahnavam
degrading oneself from the platform of tapasya
ātmanaḥ
self-caused
dadarśa bahv-ṛcācāryo
dadarśa
observed
bahu-ṛca-ācāryaḥ
Saubhari Muni, who was expert in chanting mantras
mīna-saṅga-samutthitam
mīna-saṅga
the sexual affairs of fish
samutthitam
caused by this incident.
Thereafter, one day while Saubhari Muni, who was expert in chanting mantras, was sitting in a secluded place, he thought to himself about the cause of his falldown, which was simply that he had associated himself with the sexual affairs of the fish.

Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura remarks that Saubhari Muni had fallen from his austerity because of a vaiṣṇava-aparādha. The history is that when Garuḍa wanted to eat fish, Saubhari Muni unnecessarily gave the fish shelter under his care. Because Garuḍa’s plans for eating were disappointed, Saubhari Muni certainly committed a great offense to a Vaiṣṇava. Because of this vaiṣṇava-aparādha, an offense at the lotus feet of a Vaiṣṇava, Saubhari Muni fell from his exalted position of mystic tapasya. One should not, therefore, impede the activities of a Vaiṣṇava. This is the lesson we must learn from this incident concerning Saubhari Muni.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One day while Saubhari, who was expert in chanting mantras, was sitting down, he realized his fall down had been caused by his association with some fish. Seven verses describe how Saubhari regained his sense after enjoying, caused by an offense to Garuḍa. He realized the cause of his being cheated of the bliss of the self (ātmā apahnavam) was himself (ātmanaḥ), arising from association with fish. To protect some fish he had prevented Garuḍa from eating them.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.50

↗
అహో ఇమం పశ్యత మే వినాశం తపస్విన: సచ్చరితవ్రతస్య । అన్తర్జలే వారిచరప్రసఙ్గాత్ ప్రచ్యావితం బ్రహ్మ చిరం ధృతం యత్ ॥ ౫౦ ॥
aho imaṁ paśyata me vināśaṁ
[aho imam pashyata me vinaasham]
tapasvinaḥ sac-carita-vratasya
[tapasvinah sach-charita-vratasya]
antarjale vāri-cara-prasaṅgāt
[antarjale vaari-chara-prasangaat]
pracyāvitaṁ brahma ciraṁ dhṛtaṁ yat
[prachyaavitam brahma chiram dhritam yat]
aho — alas imam — this paśyata — just see me — of me vināśam — falldown tapasvinaḥ — who was such a great mystic performing austerity sat-carita — of very good character, observing all necessary rules and regulations vratasya — of one who has taken a vow strictly antaḥ-jale — in the depths of the water vāri-cara-prasaṅgāt — because of the affairs of the aquatics pracyāvitam — fallen brahma — from the activities of Brahman realization or austerity ciram — for a long time dhṛtam — executed yat — which.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho imaṁ paśyata me vināśaṁ
aho
alas
imam
this
paśyata
just see
me
of me
vināśam
falldown
tapasvinaḥ sac-carita-vratasya
tapasvinaḥ
who was such a great mystic performing austerity
sat-carita
of very good character, observing all necessary rules and regulations
vratasya
of one who has taken a vow strictly
antarjale vāri-cara-prasaṅgāt
antaḥ-jale
in the depths of the water
vāri-cara-prasaṅgāt
because of the affairs of the aquatics
pracyāvitam
fallen
pracyāvitaṁ brahma ciraṁ dhṛtaṁ yat
brahma
from the activities of Brahman realization or austerity
ciram
for a long time
dhṛtam
executed
yat
which.
Alas! While practicing austerity, even within the depths of the water, and while observing all the rules and regulations practiced by saintly persons, I lost the results of my long austerities simply by association with the sexual affairs of fish. Everyone should observe this falldown and learn from it.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Alas! While practicing austerity, even within the depths of the water, and while observing all the rules practiced by saintly persons, I lost the results of my long austerities simply by association with the sexual affairs of fish. Everyone should observe this destruction. Brahma means austerity.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.51

↗
సఙ్గం త్యజేత మిథునవ్రతీనాం ముముక్షు: సర్వాత్మనా న విసృజేద్ బహిరిన్ద్రియాణి । ఏకశ్చరన్ రహసి చిత్తమనన్త ఈశే యుఞ్జీత తద్‍వ్రతిషు సాధుషు చేత్ ప్రసఙ్గ: ॥ ౫౧ ॥
saṅgaṁ tyajeta mithuna-vratīnāṁ mumukṣuḥ
[sangam tyajeta mithuna-vrateenaam mumukshuh]
sarvātmanā na visṛjed bahir-indriyāṇi
[sarvaatmanaa na visrijed bahir-indriyaani]
ekaś caran rahasi cittam ananta īśe
[ekash charan rahasi chittam ananta eeshe]
yuṣjīta tad-vratiṣu sādhuṣu cet prasaṅgaḥ
[yushjeeta tad-vratishu saadhushu chet prasangah]
saṅgam — association tyajeta — must give up mithuna-vratīnām — of a person engaged in sexual affairs, legal or illegal mumukṣuḥ — persons who desire liberation sarva-ātmanā — in all respects na — do not visṛjet — employ bahiḥ-indriyāṇi — external senses ekaḥ — alone caran — moving rahasi — in a secluded place cittam — the heart anante īśe — fixed at the lotus feet of the unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead yuṣjīta — one can engage himself tat-vratiṣu — with persons of the same category (desiring liberation from material bondage) sādhuṣu — such saintly persons cet — if prasaṅgaḥ — one wants association.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saṅgaṁ tyajeta mithuna-vratīnāṁ mumukṣuḥ
saṅgam
association
tyajeta
must give up
mithuna-vratīnām
of a person engaged in sexual affairs, legal or illegal
mumukṣuḥ
persons who desire liberation
sarvātmanā na visṛjed bahir-indriyāṇi
sarva-ātmanā
in all respects
na
do not
visṛjet
employ
bahiḥ-indriyāṇi
external senses
ekaś caran rahasi cittam ananta īśe
ekaḥ
alone
caran
moving
rahasi
in a secluded place
cittam
the heart
anante īśe
fixed at the lotus feet of the unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead
yuṣjīta tad-vratiṣu sādhuṣu cet prasaṅgaḥ
yuṣjīta
one can engage himself
tat-vratiṣu
with persons of the same category (desiring liberation from material bondage)
sādhuṣu
such saintly persons
cet
if
prasaṅgaḥ
one wants association.
A person desiring liberation from material bondage must give up the association of persons interested in sex life and should not employ his senses externally [in seeing, hearing, talking, walking and so on]. One should always stay in a secluded place, completely fixing his mind at the lotus feet of the unlimited Personality of Godhead, and if one wants any association at all, he should associate with persons similarly engaged.

Saubhari Muni, giving conclusions derived from his practical experience, instructs us that persons interested in crossing to the other side of the material ocean must give up the association of persons interested in sex life and accumulating money. This is also advised by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu:

niṣkiṣcanasya bhagavad-bhajanonmukasya pāraṁ paraṁ jigamiṣor bhava-sāgarasya sandarśanaṁ viṣayiṇām atha yoṣitāṁ ca hā hanta hanta viṣa-bhakṣaṇato ’py asādhu

( Caitanya-candrodaya-nāṭaka 8.27)

“Alas, for a person seriously desiring to cross the material ocean and engage in the transcendental loving service of the Lord without material motives, seeing a materialist engaged in sense gratification and seeing a woman who is similarly interested is more abominable than drinking poison willingly.”

One who desires complete freedom from material bondage can engage himself in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. He must not associate with viṣayī — materialistic persons or those interested in sex life. Every materialist is interested in sex. Thus in plain language it is advised that an exalted saintly person avoid the association of those who are materially inclined. Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura also recommends that one engage in the service of the ācāryas, and if one wants to live in association, he must live in the association of devotees ( tāṅdera caraṇa sevi bhakta-sane vāsa ). The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is creating many centers just to create devotees so that by associating with the members of such a center people will automatically become uninterested in material affairs. Although this is an ambitious proposal, this association is proving effective by the mercy of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. By gradually associating with the members of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, simply by taking prasāda and taking part in chanting of the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra, ordinary persons are being considerably elevated. Saubhari Muni regrets that he had bad association even in the deepest part of the water. Because of the bad association of the sexually engaged fish, he fell down. A secluded place is also not secure unless there is good association.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A person desiring liberation must give up the association of persons interested in sex life and should not employ his external senses. He should always stay in a secluded place, completely fixing his mind at the lotus feet of the unlimited Lord, and if there is association with devotees also engaged in meditation on the Lord it is permitted, and otherwise not. Therefore, others should not become like me. In this way he regrets his condition in two verses. He should not engage his external senses. There is no injunction not to employ the internal senses, since such an order is impossible. There is no substance in giving impossible orders. If there is excellent association with devotees fixed in the Lord (tat-vrateṣu), he should take that association. Because I lacked that association, I associated with fish engaging in sex life, arising from finding fault in Garuḍa. If there is excellent association then take it, otherwise do not associate. This negative should be supplied.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.52

↗
ఏకస్తపస్వ్యహమథామ్భసి మత్స్యసఙ్గాత్ పఞ్చాశదాసముత పఞ్చసహస్రసర్గ: । నాన్తం వ్రజామ్యుభయకృత్యమనోరథానాం మాయాగుణైర్హృతమతిర్విషయేఽర్థభావ: ॥ ౫౨ ॥
ekas tapasvy aham athāmbhasi matsya-saṅgāt
[ekas tapasvy aham athaambhasi matsya-sangaat]
paṣcāśad āsam uta paṣca-sahasra-sargaḥ
[pashchaashad aasam uta pashcha-sahasra-sargah]
nāntaṁ vrajāmy ubhaya-kṛtya-manorathānāṁ
[naantam vrajaamy ubhaya-kritya-manorathaanaam]
māyā-guṇair hṛta-matir viṣaye ’rtha-bhāvaḥ
[maayaa-gunair hrita-matir vishaye ’rtha-bhaavah]
ekaḥ — one only tapasvī — great sage aham — I atha — thus ambhasi — in the deep water matsya-saṅgāt — by associating with the fish paṣcāśat — fifty āsam — got wives uta — and what to speak of begetting one hundred sons in each of them paṣca-sahasra-sargaḥ — procreation of five thousand na antam — no end vrajāmi — I can find ubhaya-kṛtya — duties of this life and the next manorathānām — mental concoctions māyā-guṇaiḥ — influenced by the modes of material nature hṛta — lost matiḥ viṣaye — great attraction for material things artha-bhāvaḥ — matters of self-interest.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekas tapasvy aham athāmbhasi matsya-saṅgāt
ekaḥ
one only
tapasvī
great sage
aham
I
atha
thus
ambhasi
in the deep water
matsya-saṅgāt
by associating with the fish
paṣcāśad āsam uta paṣca-sahasra-sargaḥ
paṣcāśat
fifty
āsam
got wives
uta
and what to speak of begetting one hundred sons in each of them
paṣca-sahasra-sargaḥ
procreation of five thousand
nāntaṁ vrajāmy ubhaya-kṛtya-manorathānāṁ
na antam
no end
vrajāmi
I can find
ubhaya-kṛtya
duties of this life and the next
manorathānām
mental concoctions
māyā-guṇair hṛta-matir viṣaye ’rtha-bhāvaḥ
māyā-guṇaiḥ
influenced by the modes of material nature
hṛta
lost
matiḥ viṣaye
great attraction for material things
artha-bhāvaḥ
matters of self-interest.
In the beginning I was alone and engaged in performing the austerities of mystic yoga, but later, because of the association of fish engaged in sex, I desired to marry. Then I became the husband of fifty wives, and in each of them I begot one hundred sons, and thus my family increased to five thousand members. By the influence of the modes of material nature, I became fallen and thought that I would be happy in material life. Thus there is no end to my material desires for enjoyment, in this life and the next.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the beginning I was alone and engaged in performing austerities but later, because of the association of fish, I became fifty members, and then increased to five thousand members. My intelligence destroyed by the guṇas, thinking enjoyment as the goal of life, I obtained no end to my desires in this and next life. He explains further the fault of association. By association with fifty wives I became fifty. By sons I became five thousand since he had a hundred sons by each wife. Thinking that enjoyment is the goal of life (artha-bhāvaḥ), I obtained no end to desires for performing actions for this and next life (ubhaya-kṛtya).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.53

↗
ఏవం వసన్ గృహే కాలం విరక్తో న్యాసమాస్థిత: । వనం జగామానుయయుస్తత్పత్‍న్య: పతిదేవతా: ॥ ౫౩ ॥
evaṁ vasan gṛhe kālaṁ
[evam vasan grihe kaalam]
virakto nyāsam āsthitaḥ
[virakto nyaasam aasthitah]
vanaṁ jagāmānuyayus
[vanam jagaamaanuyayus]
tat-patnyaḥ pati-devatāḥ
[tat-patnyah pati-devataah]
evam — in this way vasan — living gṛhe — at home kālam — passing away time viraktaḥ — became detached nyāsam — in the renounced order of life āsthitaḥ — became situated vanam — in the forest jagāma — he went anuyayuḥ — was followed by tat-patnyaḥ — all his wives pati-devatāḥ — because their only worshipable object was their husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vasan gṛhe kālaṁ
evam
in this way
vasan
living
gṛhe
at home
kālam
passing away time
virakto nyāsam āsthitaḥ
viraktaḥ
became detached
nyāsam
in the renounced order of life
āsthitaḥ
became situated
vanaṁ jagāmānuyayus
vanam
in the forest
jagāma
he went
anuyayuḥ
was followed by
tat-patnyaḥ pati-devatāḥ
tat-patnyaḥ
all his wives
pati-devatāḥ
because their only worshipable object was their husband.
In this way he passed his life in household affairs for some time, but then he became detached from material enjoyment. To renounce material association, he accepted the vānaprastha order and went to the forest. His devoted wives followed him, for they had no shelter other than their husband.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way he passed his life in household affairs for some time, but then he became detached from material enjoyment. He accepted the vānaprastha order and went to the forest. His devoted wives followed him, for they had no shelter other than their husband. Nyāsam means giving up material association, taking vāna-prastha.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.54

↗
తత్ర తప్‍త్వా తపస్తీక్ష్ణమాత్మదర్శనమాత్మవాన్ । సహైవాగ్నిభిరాత్మానం యుయోజ పరమాత్మని ॥ ౫౪ ॥
tatra taptvā tapas tīkṣṇam
[tatra taptvaa tapas teekshnam]
ātma-darśanam ātmavān
[aatma-darshanam aatmavaan]
sahaivāgnibhir ātmānaṁ
[sahaivaagnibhir aatmaanam]
yuyoja paramātmani
[yuyoja paramaatmani]
tatra — in the forest taptvā — executing austerity tapaḥ — the regulative principles of austerity tīkṣṇam — very severely ātma-darśanam — which helps self-realization ātmavān — conversant with the self saha — with eva — certainly agnibhiḥ — fires ātmānam — the personal self yuyoja — he engaged parama-ātmani — dealing with the Supreme Soul.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra taptvā tapas tīkṣṇam
tatra
in the forest
taptvā
executing austerity
tapaḥ
the regulative principles of austerity
tīkṣṇam
very severely
ātma-darśanam ātmavān
ātma-darśanam
which helps self-realization
ātmavān
conversant with the self
sahaivāgnibhir ātmānaṁ
saha
with
eva
certainly
agnibhiḥ
fires
ātmānam
the personal self
yuyoja paramātmani
yuyoja
he engaged
parama-ātmani
dealing with the Supreme Soul.
When Saubhari Muni, who was quite conversant with the self, went to the forest, he performed severe penances. In this way, in the fire at the time of death, he ultimately engaged himself in the service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

At the time of death, fire burns the gross body, and if there is no more desire for material enjoyment the subtle body is also ended, and in this way a pure soul remains. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā ( tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti ). If one is free from the bondage of both the gross and subtle material bodies and remains a pure soul, he returns home, back to Godhead, to be engaged in the service of the Lord. Tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti: he goes back home, back to Godhead. Thus it appears that Saubhari Muni attained that perfect stage.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Saubhari, knowing the self, performed severe penances in the forest for realizing the self. He gave up his body along with the fires and attained the Supreme Lord. He gave up his body along with the household fires and attained the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.6.55

↗
తా: స్వపత్యుర్మహారాజ నిరీక్ష్యాధ్యాత్మికీం గతిమ్ । అన్వీయుస్తత్ప్రభావేణ అగ్నిం శాన్తమివార్చిష: ॥ ౫౫ ॥
tāḥ sva-patyur mahārāja
[taah sva-patyur mahaaraaja]
nirīkṣyādhyātmikīṁ gatim
[nireekshyaadhyaatmikeem gatim]
anvīyus tat-prabhāveṇa
[anveeyus tat-prabhaavena]
agniṁ śāntam ivārciṣaḥ
[agnim shaantam ivaarchishah]
tāḥ — all the wives of Saubhari sva-patyuḥ — with their own husband mahārāja — O King Parīkṣit nirīkṣya — observing adhyātmikīm — spiritual gatim — progress anvīyuḥ — followed tat-prabhāveṇa — by the influence of their husband (although they were unfit, by the influence of their husband they also could go to the spiritual world) agnim — the fire śāntam — completely merged iva — like arciṣaḥ — the flames.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāḥ sva-patyur mahārāja
tāḥ
all the wives of Saubhari
sva-patyuḥ
with their own husband
mahārāja
O King Parīkṣit
nirīkṣyādhyātmikīṁ gatim
nirīkṣya
observing
adhyātmikīm
spiritual
gatim
progress
anvīyus tat-prabhāveṇa
anvīyuḥ
followed
tat-prabhāveṇa
by the influence of their husband (although they were unfit, by the influence of their husband they also could go to the spiritual world)
agniṁ śāntam ivārciṣaḥ
agnim
the fire
śāntam
completely merged
iva
like
arciṣaḥ
the flames.
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, by observing their husband progressing in spiritual existence, Saubhari Muni’s wives were also able to enter the spiritual world by his spiritual power, just as the flames of a fire cease when the fire is extinguished.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (9.32) , striyo vaiśyās tathā śūdrās te ’pi yānti parāṁ gatim. Women are not considered very powerful in following spiritual principles, but if a woman is fortunate enough to get a suitable husband who is spiritually advanced and if she always engages in his service, she also gets the same benefit as her husband. Here it is clearly said that the wives of Saubhari Muni also entered the spiritual world by the influence of their husband. They were unfit, but because they were faithful followers of their husband, they also entered the spiritual world with him. Thus a woman should be a faithful servant of her husband, and if the husband is spiritually advanced, the woman will automatically get the opportunity to enter the spiritual world.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Ninth Canto, Sixth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Downfall of Saubhari Muni.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit! By observing their husband progressing in spiritual existence, Saubhari's wives followed him, just as the flames of a fire cease when the fire is extinguished. Anvīyuḥ means “they followed.” Thus ends the commentary on the Sixth Chapter of the Ninth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Seven The Story of Hariścandra
📝 My note