FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

9.19 · King Yayāti Achieves Liberation

27 verses
G Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15710 chars)

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Lord Krishna, the Supreme Lord, God from Goloka, appeared in the Soma Dynasty ( gotra ). Although the Lord is unborn, He lovingly appears in the family of His devotees, who aspire to serve Him in a variety of relationships. Famous kings that preceded Him include Dhanvantari, Yayati and Yadu. There was also Puru, the powerful Bharata, Rantideva, Bhismadeva and the Pandavas.

Previous The Non-Violent Incarnation Next Yayati and Devayani Last updated 2 months ago

G – God From Goloka (17-24)

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Lord Krishna, the Supreme Lord, God from Goloka, appeared in the Soma Dynasty ( gotra ). Although the Lord is unborn, He lovingly appears in the family of His devotees, who aspire to serve Him in a variety of relationships. Famous kings that preceded Him include Dhanvantari, Yayati and Yadu. There was also Puru, the powerful Bharata, Rantideva, Bhismadeva and the Pandavas.

Previous The Non-Violent Incarnation Next Yayati and Devayani Last updated 2 months ago

Bharata and Rantideva

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Bharata and Rantideva Chapter 20, 21 Sukadeva Goswami narrated the dynasty of Puru, in which Maharaja Pariksit was himself born. Dusmanta also appeared in this dynasty. Once, while hunting, Dusmanta became attracted to Sakuntala, the daughter of Visvamitra and Menaka. They married and united, and subsequently gave birth to Bharata, who was later enthroned as king. Since he performed sacrifices, worshipped the Supreme Lord, gave generously in charity and destroyed the inimical, His reign was considered ideal. His son was Bharadvaja, whose descendant was the charitable and selfless Rantideva. Rantideva had once gone without food for forty-eight days and was about to open his fast. When a brahmana suddenly appeared, Rantideva unhesitatingly offered him a portion of his meal. Having fulfilled his duty, Rantideva again prepared to eat, at which time a sudra unexpectedly arrived. Rantideva generously divided the remaining food between them and prepared to open his fast for the third time. Just then, another guest appeared. Rantideva offered everything remaining to him, and resolved to drink water. Finally, a thirsty man walked over, to whom Rantideva offered his water! Having generously donated everything, he himself was left with nothing, but joyfully prayed that his life would be dedicated to freeing others from suffering. Just then, the demigods, who were posing as these different guests, appeared on the scene to congratulate him. Everything was a divine arrangement meant to demonstrate the extraordinary selflessness and tolerance of Krishna’s devotees. Sukadeva Goswami then described the remaining descendants of Bharadvaja.

Previous Yayati and Devayani Next Bhismadeva and Pandavas Last updated 1 year ago

Bhismadeva and Pandavas

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Bhismadeva and Pandavas Chapter 22 In the generations after Divodasa came the Pancalas – Drupada, and his children Draupadi and Dhrstadyumna. Sukadeva Goswami then listed the lineage that is described in the Mahabharata. Santanu, who assumed the throne, married Ganga, and she gave birth to Devavrata (Bhismadeva). When Ganga left him, Santanu married Satyavati, the daughter of a fisherman, and had two sons named Chitrangada and Vicitravirya. Prior to her marriage with Santanu, Satyavati had united with Parasara Muni, and Vyasadeva was born. Vyasadeva taught the science of Srimad-Bhagavatam to his son, Sukadeva Goswami. When Santanu’s two sons died without begetting children, Vyasadeva was called to impregnate their wives, Ambika and Ambalika. Thus, Dhritarastra and Pandu were born. Later, Vyasadeva also impregnated the maidservant and Vidura was born. Dhritarastra had one hundred sons, headed by Duryodhana, and one daughter named Duhsala. They became known as the Kauravas. Pandu had five sons, each of them conceived by a demigod, and they all had one son from Draupadi. Those five sons of Pandu were known as the Pandavas. The son of Arjuna (from Subhadra) was Abhimanyu, and Abhimanyu’s son (from Uttara) was Maharaja Pariksit, and Maharaja Pariksit had four sons, Janamejaya, Srutasena, Bhimasena and Ugrasena. Sukadeva Goswami then described the future sons in the dynasty. Sukadeva Goswami predicted the death of Maharaja Pariksit, the subsequent rule of Janamejaya, and many kings that would appear in the future.

Previous Bharata and Rantideva Next Yayati’s Dynasty Last updated 1 year ago

Genealogy

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Genealogy “Maharaja Dusmanta, desiring to occupy the throne, returned to his original dynasty [the Puru dynasty], even though he had accepted Maruta as his father. O Maharaja Pariksit, let me now describe the dynasty of Yadu, the eldest son of Maharaja Yayati. This description is supremely pious, and it vanquishes the reactions of sinful activities in human society. Simply by hearing this description, one is freed from all sinful reactions.” ( SB 9.23.18-19 ) We may wonder why so much genealogical information is documented within the Srimad-Bhagavatam. There are long lists of kings, their descendants and generations of families, most of whom we are unfamiliar with and know nothing about. If Maharaja Pariksit had only seven days to live, why did Sukadeva Goswami spend so much time narrating such intricate details? How does genealogical information increase our devotion? If the emphasis of Srimad- Bhagavatam is to go back to godhead, why does it discuss so much transitory and ‘worldly’ history? Trigger – names are a trigger of remembrance. We may not relate to these personalities, but once we discover more about them, simply hearing their name triggers a variety of devotional sentiments – the character, qualities, relationships, pastimes and example, all act as an inspiration to bolster and inspire our own devotion. Authenticity – the Srimad-Bhagavatam is to be established as the most authentic and authoritative literature. Giving historical data and generational breakdown helps us to appreciate it as an entirely factual book of transcendental incidents that can nourish our devotional path. In fact, one of the statutory requirements of any Purana is to provide genealogical data. Reference – scriptures should be understood in an integrative way. Thus, Srimad-Bhagavatam, though complete in itself, can be read in conjunction with other books to obtain a richer understanding. Genealogical history, though seemingly not particularly useful in one’s reading of Srimad-Bhagavatam, can help when we cross-reference books and try to understand Vedic history in more depth. Rarity – when exhaustive lists are narrated, the speakers recite the names very quickly and then stop at a personality who was famed as a great devotee. At that point, the history of that great devotee is described. Focusing in on one devotee amongst such huge lineages helps one to appreciate how rare these pure and spotless devotees are. Indeed, Krishna confirms that out of many thousands of souls, a rare few may surrender to the Lord out of pure love. Transitory – various passages of Srimad-Bhagavatam stress the ephemeral nature of life. Descriptions of genealogy further highlight this point, showing how great monarchs, despite their influence, power, riches and dominion over the people, had to surrender to the inevitable waves of time. Hearing narrations of the annals of history reminds us that everything must pass. As Srila Prabhupada once reflected, “All that is left of my family life is a long list of names.”

Previous God from Goloka: Sri Krishna Next Soma and Surya Last updated 1 year ago

Our Disciplic Line

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Genealogy Our Disciplic Line “The path of spiritual realisation is undoubtedly difficult. The Lord therefore advises us to approach a bona fide spiritual master in the line of disciplic succession from the Lord Himself. No one can be a bona fide spiritual master without following this principle of disciplic succession. The Lord is the original spiritual master, and a person in the disciplic succession can convey the message of the Lord as it is to his disciple. No one can be spiritually realised by manufacturing his own process, as is the fashion of the foolish pretenders.” ( BG 4.34 ) Through disciplic succession, knowledge of the Lord is perfectly transmitted, just as a ripe fruit is delicately passed down to those on the ground from the top of a tree. If it’s mishandled or dropped, the juicy fruit is spoiled. Thus, each link in the chain of disciplic succession has a grave responsibility to preserve the essence. All the great saints and sages in our line of disciplic succession, the Brahma- Madhva-Gaudiya Sampradaya, beginning with Sri Krishna and including Brahma, Narada, Vyasa, Lord Chaitanya, Srila Narottama Dasa Thakura, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura, and A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, have personally realised and taught Krishna consciousness. If the result of a process is good, then the process itself must be good. These great saints and acaryas are unmatched in spiritual realisation so the process of God realisation first spoken by Krishna and passed on through the disciplic succession is also matchless.

Previous Two Disciplic Successions Next B.A.B.Y Last updated 1 year ago

Soma and Surya

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Genealogy Soma and Surya Canto Nine documents the lineages of Surya and Soma, or the kings who descend from the sun-god and moon-god respectively. Chapters 1 - 13 describe the Surya Vamsa, within which Lord Rama appeared. Chapters 14 - 24 describe the Soma Vamsa, within which Lord Krishna appeared. “The Yadu dynasty belonged to the family descending from Soma, the moon- god. Although the planetary systems are so arranged that the sun comes first, before the moon, Pariksit Maharaja gave more respect to the dynasty of the moon-god, the soma-vamsa, because in the Yadava dynasty, descending from the moon, Krishna had appeared. There are two different ksatriya families of the royal order, one descending from the king of the moon planet and the other descending from the king of the sun. When the Supreme Personality of Godhead appears, He generally appears in a ksatriya family because He comes to establish religious principles and the life of righteousness. According to the Vedic system, the ksatriya family is the protector of the human race. When the Supreme Personality of Godhead appeared as Lord Ramacandra, He appeared in the surya-vamsa, the family descending from the sun-god, and when He appeared as Lord Krishna, He did so in the Yadu dynasty, or yadu-vamsa, whose descent was from the moon-god.” ( SB 10.1.1)

Previous Genealogy Next Two Disciplic Successions Last updated 1 year ago

Two Disciplic Successions

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Genealogy Two Disciplic Successions In Vedic culture, spiritual knowledge descends through two types of succession – seminal relationship ( sukra ) and spiritual relationship ( sautra ). In the seminal succession, knowledge was imparted to the son ( putra ), and in the spiritual succession knowledge was imparted to the disciple ( chatra ). Knowledge would thus be passed through the generations. History documents that there have been deviations. In the seminal line we find that casteism can become prominent, where individuals draw spiritual authority based on their birthright, without possessing the corresponding character and realisation required for spiritual leadership. Such persons deviate the teachings away from their pure form and utilise their position for selfish material benefit instead of selfless spiritual service to others. They fail to communicate the essence of transcendental teachings to the next generation and thus cause a spiritual vacuum in the world. Indeed, Krishna himself declares that He appears when such successions become defunct: “This supreme science was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession, and the saintly kings understood it in that way. But in course of time the succession was broken, and therefore the science as it is appears to be lost. That very ancient science of the relationship with the Supreme is today told by Me to you because you are My devotee as well as My friend and can therefore understand the transcendental mystery of this science.” ( BG 4.2 - 3 )

Previous Soma and Surya Next Our Disciplic Line Last updated 1 year ago

God from Goloka: Sri Krishna

G – God From Goloka (17-24) God from Goloka: Sri Krishna Chapter 24 In the Yadu dynasty came Vasudeva, who had multiple wives, amongst whom Devaki and Rohini were the most prominent. From the womb of Rohini, Baladeva was born. Vasudeva had many sons by his other wives, but the eighth son to appear from the womb of Devaki was the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who delivered the world from the burden of demons and performed exquisite pastimes to attract the entire creation. Sukadeva Goswami highlighted some key events from His pastimes, and thus glorified the Lord, whose entire history is described in Canto Ten.

Previous Yayati’s Dynasty Next Genealogy Last updated 1 year ago

Yayati and Devayani

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Yayati and Devayani Chapter 17, 18, 19 Sukadeva Goswami listed the descendants of Pururava, beginning with the five sons of Ayu, the eldest son of Pururava. The dynasties of four of them, beginning with Ksatravrddha, are described first. In this dynasty comes Dhanvantari, the inaugurator of medical sciences. The final of Ayu’s sons is Nahusa, and it is in this lineage that Yayati appeared. After Nahusa was cursed to become a python, Yayati became the king. Sukadeva Goswami then explained his interesting story. Once, when Devayani and Sarmistha were bathing, Lord Siva happened to pass by. They quickly dressed themselves, but Sarmistha accidently put Devayani’s clothes on. Devayani, who was from a brahmana family, heavily rebuked Sarmistha, her maidservant, for putting on her clothes. In retaliation, Sarmistha threw Devayani into a well. When King Yayati passed by and saw Devayani stranded, he saved her, and ended up marrying her, though it was unconventional according to tradition for a ksatriya king to marry a brahmana . After informing her father, Sukracarya, about the events, Devayani insisted that Sarmistha become her maidservant due to her nefarious acts. Vrsaparva, the father of Sarmistha, readily agreed, not wanting to displease his spiritual master (Sukracarya) further. The marriage took place, and Sukracarya left Yayati with one final warning – that he should never unite with Sarmistha. Unable to resist her, Yayati later impregnated Sarmistha, causing Devayani to become furious. Sukracarya angrily cursed Yayati to become old and invalid, but left him with a boon that would enable him to exchange his old age with a younger person. Yayati’s four older sons refused to do it, but his youngest son, Puru, readily agreed. After a thousand years of enjoyment, Yayati became disgusted and composed the story of a he-goat and she-goat, which accurately depicted his entangled predicament. He awarded Puru with his youth again, renounced his opulence, accepted sannyasa and attained perfection. Devayani followed suit and immersed herself in devotional service.

Previous G – God From Goloka (17-24) Next Bharata and Rantideva Last updated 1 year ago

Yayati’s Dynasty

G – God From Goloka (17-24) Yayati’s Dynasty Chapter 23 Sukadeva Goswami described the dynasties of Yayati’s sons, namely Anu, Druhyu, Turvasu and Yadu, as well as the story of Jyamagha.

Previous Bhismadeva and Pandavas Next God from Goloka: Sri Krishna Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ స ఇత్థమాచరన్ కామాన్ స్త్రైణోఽపహ్నవమాత్మన: । బుద్ధ్వా ప్రియాయై నిర్విణ్ణో గాథామేతామగాయత ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
sa ittham ācaran kāmān
[sa ittham aacharan kaamaan]
straiṇo ’pahnavam ātmanaḥ
[straino ’pahnavam aatmanah]
buddhvā priyāyai nirviṇṇo
[buddhvaa priyaayai nirvinno]
gāthām etām agāyata
[gaathaam etaam agaayata]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said saḥ — Mahārāja Yayāti ittham — in this way ācaran — behaving kāmān — in regard to lusty desires straiṇaḥ — very much attached to woman apahnavam — counteraction ātmanaḥ — of his own welfare buddhvā — understanding with intelligence priyāyai — unto his beloved wife, Devayānī nirviṇṇaḥ — disgusted gāthām — story etām — this (as follows) agāyata — narrated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
sa ittham ācaran kāmān
saḥ
Mahārāja Yayāti
ittham
in this way
ācaran
behaving
kāmān
in regard to lusty desires
straiṇo ’pahnavam ātmanaḥ
straiṇaḥ
very much attached to woman
buddhvā priyāyai nirviṇṇo
apahnavam
counteraction
gāthām etām agāyata
ātmanaḥ
of his own welfare
buddhvā
understanding with intelligence
priyāyai
unto his beloved wife, Devayānī
nirviṇṇaḥ
disgusted
gāthām
story
etām
this (as follows)
agāyata
narrated.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, Yayāti was very much attached to woman. In due course of time, however, when disgusted with sexual enjoyment and its bad effects, he renounced this way of life and narrated the following story to his beloved wife.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, Yayāti, enjoying in this way and attached to woman, then considered he had been cheated, and, becoming disgusted, narrated the following story to his beloved wife. In the Nineteenth Chapter, King Yayāti compares himself to a goat, becomes detached and attains Kṛṣṇa. His wife absorbs her mind in Kṛṣṇa and gives up her body. Kāmān ācaran means “he enjoyed.” Apahnavam means “he was cheated.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.2

↗
శ‍ృణు భార్గవ్యమూం గాథాం మద్విధాచరితాం భువి । ధీరా యస్యానుశోచన్తి వనే గ్రామనివాసిన: ॥ ౨ ॥
śṛṇu bhārgavy amūṁ gāthāṁ
[shrinu bhaargavy amoom gaathaam]
mad-vidhācaritāṁ bhuvi
[mad-vidhaacharitaam bhuvi]
dhīrā yasyānuśocanti
[dheeraa yasyaanushochanti]
vane grāma-nivāsinaḥ
[vane graama-nivaasinah]
śṛṇu — please hear bhārgavi — O daughter of Śukrācārya amūm — this gāthām — history mat-vidhā — exactly resembling my behavior ācaritām — behavior bhuvi — within this world dhīrāḥ — those who are sober and intelligent yasya — of whom anuśocanti — lament very much vane — in the forest grāma-nivāsinaḥ — very much attached to materialistic enjoyment.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śṛṇu bhārgavy amūṁ gāthāṁ
śṛṇu
please hear
bhārgavi
O daughter of Śukrācārya
amūm
this
gāthām
history
mad-vidhācaritāṁ bhuvi
mat-vidhā
exactly resembling my behavior
ācaritām
behavior
bhuvi
within this world
dhīrā yasyānuśocanti
dhīrāḥ
those who are sober and intelligent
yasya
of whom
anuśocanti
lament very much
vane grāma-nivāsinaḥ
vane
in the forest
grāma-nivāsinaḥ
very much attached to materialistic enjoyment.
My dearly beloved wife, daughter of Śukrācārya, in this world there was someone exactly like me. Please listen as I narrate the history of his life. By hearing about the life of such a householder, those who have retired from householder life always lament.

Persons who live in the village or town are called grāma-nivāsī, and those who live in the forest are called vana-vāsī or vānaprastha. The vānaprasthas, who have retired from family life, generally lament about their past family life because it engaged them in trying to fulfill lusty desires. Prahlāda Mahārāja said that one should retire from family life as soon as possible, and he described family life as the darkest well ( hitvātma-pātaṁ gṛham andha-kūpam ). If one continuously or permanently concentrates on living with his family, he should be understood to be killing himself. In the Vedic civilization, therefore, it is recommended that one retire from family life at the end of his fiftieth year and go to vana, the forest. When he becomes expert or accustomed to forest life, or retired life as a vānaprastha, he should accept sannyāsa. Vanaṁ gato yad dharim āśrayeta. Sannyāsa means accepting unalloyed engagement in the service of the Lord. Vedic civilization therefore recommends four different stages of life — brahmacarya, gṛhastha, vānaprastha and sannyāsa. One should be very much ashamed of remaining a householder and not promoting oneself to the two higher stages, namely vānaprastha and sannyāsa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O daughter of Śukrācārya! Please listen as I narrate the history of a householder like me, for whom the wise who live in the forest lament. Hear the story of a person who acted like me, a householder, for whom those living in the forest lament.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.3

↗
బస్త ఏకో వనే కశ్చిద్ విచిన్వన్ ప్రియమాత్మన: । దదర్శ కూపే పతితాం స్వకర్మవశగామజామ్ ॥ ౩ ॥
basta eko vane kaścid
[basta eko vane kashchid]
vicinvan priyam ātmanaḥ
[vichinvan priyam aatmanah]
dadarśa kūpe patitāṁ
[dadarsha koope patitaam]
sva-karma-vaśagām ajām
[sva-karma-vashagaam ajaam]
bastaḥ — goat ekaḥ — one vane — in a forest kaścit — some vicinvan — searching for food priyam — very dear ātmanaḥ — for himself dadarśa — saw by chance kūpe — within a well patitām — fallen sva-karma-vaśa-gām — under the influence of the results of fruitive activities ajām — a she-goat.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
basta eko vane kaścid
bastaḥ
goat
ekaḥ
one
vane
in a forest
kaścit
some
vicinvan priyam ātmanaḥ
vicinvan
searching for food
priyam
very dear
ātmanaḥ
for himself
dadarśa kūpe patitāṁ
dadarśa
saw by chance
kūpe
within a well
patitām
fallen
sva-karma-vaśagām ajām
sva-karma-vaśa-gām
under the influence of the results of fruitive activities
ajām
a she-goat.
While wandering in the forest, eating to satisfy his senses, a he-goat by chance approached a well, in which he saw a she-goat standing helplessly, having fallen into it by the influence of the results of fruitive activities.

Here Mahārāja Yayāti compares himself to a he-goat and Devayānī to a she-goat and describes the nature of man and woman. Like a he-goat, a man searches for sense gratification, wandering here and there, and a woman without the shelter of a man or husband is like a she-goat that has fallen into a well. Without being cared for by a man, a woman cannot be happy. Indeed, she is just like a she-goat that has fallen into a well and is struggling for existence. Therefore a woman must take shelter of her father, as Devayānī did when under the care of Śukrācārya, and then the father must give the daughter in charity to a suitable man, or a suitable man should help the woman by placing her under the care of a husband. This is shown vividly by the life of Devayānī. When King Yayāti delivered Devayānī from the well, she felt great relief and requested Yayāti to accept her as his wife. But when Mahārāja Yayāti accepted Devayānī, he became too attached and had sex life not only with her but with others, like Śarmiṣṭhā. Yet still he was dissatisfied. Therefore one should retire by force from such family life as Yayāti’s. When one is fully convinced of the degrading nature of worldly family life, one should completely renounce this way of life, take sannyāsa, and engage himself fully in the service of the Lord. Then one’s life will be successful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While wandering in the forest, looking for food, a he-goat by chance approached a well, in which he saw a she-goat who had fallen there under the control of karma. The goat refers to Yayāti. The forest is saṁsāra. The female goat is material happiness represented by Devayānī.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.4

↗
తస్యా ఉద్ధరణోపాయం బస్త: కామీ విచిన్తయన్ । వ్యధత్త తీర్థముద్‍ధృత్య విషాణాగ్రేణ రోధసీ ॥ ౪ ॥
tasyā uddharaṇopāyaṁ
[tasyaa uddharanopaayam]
bastaḥ kāmī vicintayan
[bastah kaamee vichintayan]
vyadhatta tīrtham uddhṛtya
[vyadhatta teertham uddhritya]
viṣāṇāgreṇa rodhasī
[vishaanaagrena rodhasee]
tasyāḥ — of the she-goat uddharaṇa-upāyam — the means of deliverance (from the well) bastaḥ — the he-goat kāmī — having lusty desires vicintayan — planning vyadhatta — executed tīrtham — a way to come out uddhṛtya — digging the earth viṣāṇa-agreṇa — by the point of the horns rodhasī — at the edge of the well.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyā uddharaṇopāyaṁ
tasyāḥ
of the she-goat
uddharaṇa-upāyam
the means of deliverance (from the well)
bastaḥ kāmī vicintayan
bastaḥ
the he-goat
kāmī
having lusty desires
vicintayan
planning
vyadhatta tīrtham uddhṛtya
vyadhatta
executed
tīrtham
a way to come out
uddhṛtya
digging the earth
viṣāṇāgreṇa rodhasī
viṣāṇa-agreṇa
by the point of the horns
rodhasī
at the edge of the well.
After planning how to get the she-goat out of the well, the lusty he-goat dug up the earth on the well’s edge with the point of his horns in such a way that she was able to come out very easily.

Attraction for woman is the impetus for economic development, housing and many other things meant for living comfortably in this material world. Digging up the earth to make a way out for the she-goat was a laborious task, but before accepting the she-goat, the he-goat underwent this labor. Aho gṛha-kṣetra-sutāpta-vittair janasya moho ’yam ahaṁ mameti. The union between male and female provides the impetus for gaining a nice apartment, a good income, children and friends. Thus one becomes entangled in this material world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After planning how to get the she-goat out of the well, the lusty he-goat dug up the earth on the well's edge with the point of his horns and made a path for her. Digging up earth with the tips of his horns at the edge of the well, he produced a path by which she could get out.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.5-6

↗
సోత్తీర్య కూపాత్ సుశ్రోణీ తమేవ చకమే కిల । తయా వృతం సముద్వీక్ష్య బహ్వ్యోఽజా: కాన్తకామినీ: ॥ ౫ ॥ పీవానం శ్మశ్రులం ప్రేష్ఠం మీఢ్‍వాంసం యాభకోవిదమ్ । స ఏకోఽజవృషస్తాసాం బహ్వీనాం రతివర్ధన: । రేమే కామగ్రహగ్రస్త ఆత్మానం నావబుధ్యత ॥ ౬ ॥
sottīrya kūpāt suśroṇī
[sotteerya koopaat sushronee]
tam eva cakame kila
[tam eva chakame kila]
tayā vṛtaṁ samudvīkṣya
[tayaa vritam samudveekshya]
bahvyo ’jāḥ kānta-kāminīḥ
[bahvyo ’jaah kaanta-kaamineeh]
pīvānaṁ śmaśrulaṁ preṣṭhaṁ
[peevaanam shmashrulam preshtham]
mīḍhvāṁsaṁ yābha-kovidam
[meedhvaamsam yaabha-kovidam]
sa eko ’javṛṣas tāsāṁ
[sa eko ’javrishas taasaam]
bahvīnāṁ rati-vardhanaḥ
[bahveenaam rati-vardhanah]
reme kāma-graha-grasta
[reme kaama-graha-grasta]
ātmānaṁ nāvabudhyata
[aatmaanam naavabudhyata]
sā — the she-goat uttīrya — getting out kūpāt — from the well su-śroṇī — possessing very nice hips tam — unto the he-goat eva — indeed cakame — desired to get as her husband kila — indeed tayā — by her vṛtam — accepted samudvīkṣya — seeing bahvyaḥ — many others ajāḥ — she-goats kānta-kāminīḥ — desiring to get the he-goat as their husband pīvānam — very stout and strong śmaśrulam — having a very nice mustache and beard preṣṭham — first-class mīḍhvāṁsam — expert in discharging semen yābha-kovidam — expert in the art of sexual intercourse saḥ — that he-goat ekaḥ — alone aja-vṛṣaḥ — the hero of the goats tāsām — of all the she-goats bahvīnām — a great number rati-vardhanaḥ — could increase the lusty desire reme — he enjoyed kāma-graha-grastaḥ — being haunted by the ghost of lusty desire ātmānam — his own self na — not avabudhyata — could understand.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sottīrya kūpāt suśroṇī
tam eva cakame kila
tayā vṛtaṁ samudvīkṣya
sā
the she-goat
uttīrya
getting out
kūpāt
from the well
su-śroṇī
possessing very nice hips
bahvyo ’jāḥ kānta-kāminīḥ
tam
unto the he-goat
eva
indeed
cakame
desired to get as her husband
kila
indeed
pīvānaṁ śmaśrulaṁ preṣṭhaṁ
mīḍhvāṁsaṁ yābha-kovidam
sa eko ’javṛṣas tāsāṁ
tayā
by her
vṛtam
accepted
samudvīkṣya
seeing
bahvīnāṁ rati-vardhanaḥ
bahvyaḥ
many others
ajāḥ
she-goats
reme kāma-graha-grasta
kānta-kāminīḥ
desiring to get the he-goat as their husband
pīvānam
very stout and strong
śmaśrulam
having a very nice mustache and beard
preṣṭham
first-class
mīḍhvāṁsam
expert in discharging semen
ātmānaṁ nāvabudhyata
yābha-kovidam
expert in the art of sexual intercourse
saḥ
that he-goat
ekaḥ
alone
aja-vṛṣaḥ
the hero of the goats
tāsām
of all the she-goats
bahvīnām
a great number
rati-vardhanaḥ
could increase the lusty desire
reme
he enjoyed
kāma-graha-grastaḥ
being haunted by the ghost of lusty desire
ātmānam
his own self
na
not
avabudhyata
could understand.
When the she-goat, who had very nice hips, got out of the well and saw the very handsome he-goat, she desired to accept him as her husband. When she did so, many other she-goats also desired him as their husband because he had a very beautiful bodily structure and a nice mustache and beard and was expert in discharging semen and in the art of sexual intercourse. Therefore, just as a person haunted by a ghost exhibits madness, the best of the he-goats, attracted by the many she-goats, engaged in erotic activities and naturally forgot his real business of self-realization.

Materialists are certainly very much attracted by sexual intercourse. Yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham . Although one becomes a gṛhastha, or householder, to enjoy sex life to his heart’s content, one is never satisfied. Such a lusty materialist is like a goat, for it is said that if goats meant for slaughter get the opportunity, they enjoy sex before being killed. Human beings, however, are meant for self-realization.

tapo divyaṁ putrakā yena sattvaṁ śuddhyed yasmād brahma-saukhyaṁ tv anantam

Human life is meant for realization of the self, the spiritual soul within the body ( dehino ’smin yathā dehe ). A materialistic rascal does not know that he is not the body but a spiritual soul within the body. However, one should understand his real position and cultivate knowledge by which to get free from bodily entanglement. Like an unfortunate person who acts madly, haunted by ghosts, a materialist haunted by the ghost of lust forgets his real business so that he can enjoy so-called happiness in the bodily concept of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Getting out of the well, the she-goat with attractive hips desired to accept him as her husband. When she did so, many other she-goats also desired him as their husband because he was big, had a mustache and beard, had abundant semen, and was expert at sexual intercourse. Haunted by the ghost of lust, the one hero among the he-goats, increasing his desire among many she-goats, engaged in erotic activities and naturally forgot his spiritual commitment. Many she-goats who desired a lover (such as Śarmiṣṭhā) had a desire for him. Miḍhvāṁsaṁ means “one who impregnates semen.” He was expert in sex life (yābha-kovidam).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.7

↗
తమేవ ప్రేష్ఠతమయా రమమాణమజాన్యయా । విలోక్య కూపసంవిగ్నా నామృష్యద్ బస్తకర్మ తత్ ॥ ౭ ॥
tam eva preṣṭhatamayā
[tam eva preshthatamayaa]
ramamāṇam ajānyayā
[ramamaanam ajaanyayaa]
vilokya kūpa-saṁvignā
[vilokya koopa-samvignaa]
nāmṛṣyad basta-karma tat
[naamrishyad basta-karma tat]
tam — the he-goat eva — indeed preṣṭhatamayā — beloved ramamāṇam — engaged in sexual activities ajā — the she-goat anyayā — with another she-goat vilokya — by seeing kūpa-saṁvignā — the she-goat who had fallen into the well na — not amṛṣyat — tolerated basta-karma — the business of the goat tat — that (sex is accepted here as the business of the goat).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam eva preṣṭhatamayā
tam
the he-goat
eva
indeed
preṣṭhatamayā
beloved
ramamāṇam ajānyayā
ramamāṇam
engaged in sexual activities
ajā
the she-goat
anyayā
with another she-goat
vilokya kūpa-saṁvignā
vilokya
by seeing
kūpa-saṁvignā
the she-goat who had fallen into the well
na
not
nāmṛṣyad basta-karma tat
amṛṣyat
tolerated
basta-karma
the business of the goat
tat
that (sex is accepted here as the business of the goat).
When the she-goat who had fallen into the well saw her beloved goat engaged in sexual affairs with another she-goat, she could not tolerate the goat’s activities.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the she-goat who had fallen into the well saw her beloved goat engaged in sexual affairs with another she-goat, she could not tolerate the goat's activities. Ajānyayā means “another goat.” This is an irregular formation of a compound. The goat who had fallen in the well refers to Devayānī.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.8

↗
తం దుర్హృదం సుహృద్రూపం కామినం క్షణసౌహృదమ్ । ఇన్ద్రియారామముత్సృజ్య స్వామినం దు:ఖితా యయౌ ॥ ౮ ॥
taṁ durhṛdaṁ suhṛd-rūpaṁ
[tam durhridam suhrid-roopam]
kāminaṁ kṣaṇa-sauhṛdam
[kaaminam kshana-sauhridam]
indriyārāmam utsṛjya
[indriyaaraamam utsrijya]
svāminaṁ duḥkhitā yayau
[svaaminam duhkhitaa yayau]
tam — him (the he-goat) durhṛdam — cruel hearted suhṛt-rūpam — pretending to be a friend kāminam — very lusty kṣaṇa-sauhṛdam — having friendship for the time being indriya-ārāmam — interested only in sense gratification or sensuality utsṛjya — giving up svāminam — to her present husband, or to the former maintainer duḥkhitā — being very much aggrieved yayau — she left.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ durhṛdaṁ suhṛd-rūpaṁ
tam
him (the he-goat)
durhṛdam
cruel hearted
suhṛt-rūpam
pretending to be a friend
kāminaṁ kṣaṇa-sauhṛdam
kāminam
very lusty
kṣaṇa-sauhṛdam
having friendship for the time being
indriyārāmam utsṛjya
indriya-ārāmam
interested only in sense gratification or sensuality
utsṛjya
giving up
svāminaṁ duḥkhitā yayau
svāminam
to her present husband, or to the former maintainer
duḥkhitā
being very much aggrieved
yayau
she left.
Aggrieved by her husband’s behavior with another, the she-goat thought that the he-goat was not actually her friend but was hardhearted and was her friend only for the time being. Therefore, because her husband was lusty, she left him and returned to her former maintainer.

The word svāminam is significant. Svāmī means “caretaker” or “master.” Devayānī was cared for by Śukrācārya before her marriage, and after her marriage she was cared for by Yayāti, but here the word svāminam indicates that Devayānī left the protection of her husband, Yayāti, and returned to her former protector, Śukrācārya. Vedic civilization recommends that a woman stay under the protection of a man. During childhood she should be cared for by her father, in youth by her husband, and in old age by a grown son. In any stage of life, a woman should not have independence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Giving up the goat who was cruel, who was a temporary friend pretending to be friend who was interested only in his own enjoyment, she returned to her master in grief. The master is Śukrācārya. Referring to him as svāmī is a fault that should be overlooked. Pāṇini says svāmin īśvaraḥ (2.3.39) svāmī means controller. Thus svāmī does not only refer to a husband. Or svāminam can refer to her husband. She rejected him and left in grief.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.9

↗
సోఽపి చానుగత: స్త్రైణ: కృపణస్తాం ప్రసాదితుమ్ । కుర్వన్నిడవిడాకారం నాశక్నోత్ పథి సన్ధితుమ్ ॥ ౯ ॥
so ’pi cānugataḥ straiṇaḥ
[so ’pi chaanugatah strainah]
kṛpaṇas tāṁ prasāditum
[kripanas taam prasaaditum]
kurvann iḍaviḍā-kāraṁ
[kurvann idavidaa-kaaram]
nāśaknot pathi sandhitum
[naashaknot pathi sandhitum]
saḥ — that he-goat api — also ca — also anugataḥ — following the she-goat straiṇaḥ — henpecked kṛpaṇaḥ — very poor tām — her prasāditum — to satisfy kurvan — making iḍaviḍā-kāram — an utterance in the language of the goats na — not aśaknot — was able pathi — on the road sandhitum — to satisfy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’pi cānugataḥ straiṇaḥ
kṛpaṇas tāṁ prasāditum
saḥ
that he-goat
api
also
ca
also
kurvann iḍaviḍā-kāraṁ
anugataḥ
following the she-goat
straiṇaḥ
henpecked
kṛpaṇaḥ
very poor
tām
her
prasāditum
to satisfy
kurvan
making
iḍaviḍā-kāram
an utterance in the language of the goats
nāśaknot pathi sandhitum
na
not
aśaknot
was able
pathi
on the road
sandhitum
to satisfy.
Being very sorry, the he-goat, who was subservient to his wife, followed the she-goat on the road and tried his best to flatter her, but he could not pacify her.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The he-goat, who was subservient to his wife, in misery followed the she-goat on the road and tried his best to flatter her, but he could not satisfy her. Iḍividākāram means the language of goats. Sandhitum means “to please.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.10

↗
తస్యతత్ర ద్విజ: కశ్చిదజాస్వామ్యచ్ఛినద్ రుషా । లమ్బన్తం వృషణం భూయ: సన్దధేఽర్థాయ యోగవిత్ ॥ ౧౦ ॥
tasya tatra dvijaḥ kaścid
[tasya tatra dvijah kashchid]
ajā-svāmy acchinad ruṣā
[ajaa-svaamy achchinad rushaa]
lambantaṁ vṛṣaṇaṁ bhūyaḥ
[lambantam vrishanam bhooyah]
sandadhe ’rthāya yogavit
[sandadhe ’rthaaya yogavit]
tasya — of the he-goat tatra — thereupon dvijaḥ — brāhmaṇa kaścit — some ajā-svāmī — the maintainer of another she-goat acchinat — castrated, made effeminate ruṣā — out of anger lambantam — long vṛṣaṇam — testicles bhūyaḥ — again sandadhe — joined arthāya — for self-interest yoga-vit — expert in the power of mystic yoga..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya tatra dvijaḥ kaścid
tasya
of the he-goat
tatra
thereupon
dvijaḥ
brāhmaṇa
kaścit
some
ajā-svāmy acchinad ruṣā
ajā-svāmī
the maintainer of another she-goat
acchinat
castrated, made effeminate
ruṣā
out of anger
lambantaṁ vṛṣaṇaṁ bhūyaḥ
lambantam
long
vṛṣaṇam
testicles
bhūyaḥ
again
sandadhe ’rthāya yogavit
sandadhe
joined
arthāya
for self-interest
yoga-vit
expert in the power of mystic yoga..
The she-goat went to the residence of a brāhmaṇa who was the maintainer of another she-goat, and that brāhmaṇa angrily cut off the he-goat’s dangling testicles. But at the he-goat’s request, the brāhmaṇa later rejoined them by the power of mystic yoga.

Here Śukrācārya is figuratively described as the husband of another she-goat. This indicates that the relationship between husband and wife in any society, whether higher or lower than human society, is nothing but the same relationship between he-goat and she-goat, for the material relationship between man and woman is one of sex. Yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham . Śukrācārya was an ācārya, or expert, in family affairs, which involve the transfer of semen from he-goat to she-goat. The words kaścid ajā-svāmī expressly indicate herein that Śukrācārya was no better than Yayāti, for both of them were interested in family affairs generated by śukra, or semen. Śukrācārya first cursed Yayāti to become old so that he could no longer indulge in sex, but when Śukrācārya saw that Yayāti’s emasculation would make his own daughter a victim of punishment, he used his mystic power to restore Yayāti’s masculinity. Because he used his power of mystic yoga for family affairs and not to realize the Supreme Personality of Godhead, this exercise in the magic of yoga was no better than the affairs of he-goats and she-goats. Yogic power should properly be used to realize the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As the Lord Himself recommends in Bhagavad-gītā (6.47) :

yoginām api sarveṣāṁ mad-gatenāntarātmanā śraddhāvān bhajate yo māṁ sa me yuktatamo mataḥ

“Of all yogīs, he who always abides in Me with great faith, worshiping Me in transcendental loving service, is most intimately united with Me in yoga and is the highest of all.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The she-goat went to the residence of a brāhmaṇa who was the maintainer of another she-goat, and that brāhmaṇa angrily cut off the he-goat's dangling testicles. But at the he-goat's request, the expert brāhmaṇa later rejoined them. The brāhmaṇa was Śukrācārya. He was the husband of another she-goat, his wife. He cut off his testicles. This means he made him incapable of enjoyment by giving him old age. Then, being pleased, he put them back as before for giving sexual enjoyment. He gave him youth in exchange for his old age. Yogavit means expert.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.11

↗
సమ్బద్ధవృషణ: సోఽపి హ్యజయా కూపలబ్ధయా । కాలం బహుతిథం భద్రే కామైర్నాద్యాపి తుష్యతి ॥ ౧౧ ॥
sambaddha-vṛṣaṇaḥ so ’pi
[sambaddha-vrishanah so ’pi]
hy ajayā kūpa-labdhayā
[hy ajayaa koopa-labdhayaa]
kālaṁ bahu-tithaṁ bhadre
[kaalam bahu-titham bhadre]
kāmair nādyāpi tuṣyati
[kaamair naadyaapi tushyati]
sambaddha-vṛṣaṇaḥ — rejoined with his testicles saḥ — he api — also hi — indeed ajayā — with the she-goat kūpa-labdhayā — whom he got from the well kālam — for a time bahu-titham — of a long, long duration bhadre — O my dear wife kāmaiḥ — with such lusty desires na — not adya api — even until now tuṣyati — is satisfied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sambaddha-vṛṣaṇaḥ so ’pi
sambaddha-vṛṣaṇaḥ
rejoined with his testicles
saḥ
he
hy ajayā kūpa-labdhayā
kālaṁ bahu-tithaṁ bhadre
kāmair nādyāpi tuṣyati
api
also
hi
indeed
ajayā
with the she-goat
kūpa-labdhayā
whom he got from the well
kālam
for a time
bahu-titham
of a long, long duration
bhadre
O my dear wife
kāmaiḥ
with such lusty desires
na
not
adya api
even until now
tuṣyati
is satisfied.
My dear wife, when the he-goat had his testicles restored, he enjoyed the she-goat he had gotten from the well, but although he continued to enjoy for many, many years, even now he has not been fully satisfied.

When one is bound by affection for one’s wife, one is attached to sexual desires that are very difficult to overcome. Therefore, according to Vedic civilization, one must voluntarily leave his so-called home and go to the forest. Paṣcāśordhvaṁ vanaṁ vrajet . Human life is meant for such tapasya, or austerity. By the austerity of voluntarily stopping sex life at home and going to the forest to engage in spiritual activities in the association of devotees, one achieves the actual purpose of human life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear wife! When the he-goat had his testicles restored, he was not able to be satisfied by his enjoyment with the she-goat he had rescued from the well, for many, many years, even till now. Instead of kūpa-labdhayā another version has kāma-labdhayā. Over a along period of time, though he enjoyed, he was not satisfied.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.12

↗
తథాహం కృపణ: సుభ్రు భవత్యా: ప్రేమయన్త్రిత: । ఆత్మానం నాభిజానామి మోహితస్తవ మాయయా ॥ ౧౨ ॥
tathāhaṁ kṛpaṇaḥ subhru
[tathaaham kripanah subhru]
bhavatyāḥ prema-yantritaḥ
[bhavatyaah prema-yantritah]
ātmānaṁ nābhijānāmi
[aatmaanam naabhijaanaami]
mohitas tava māyayā
[mohitas tava maayayaa]
tathā — exactly like the he-goat aham — I kṛpaṇaḥ — a miser with no sense of the importance of life su-bhru — O my wife, with beautiful eyebrows bhavatyāḥ — in your company prema-yantritaḥ — as if tied in love, although it is actually lust ātmānam — self-realization (what I am and what my duty is) na abhijānāmi — I could not realize even until now mohitaḥ — being bewildered tava — your māyayā — by the materially attractive feature.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tathāhaṁ kṛpaṇaḥ subhru
tathā
exactly like the he-goat
aham
I
kṛpaṇaḥ
a miser with no sense of the importance of life
su-bhru
O my wife, with beautiful eyebrows
bhavatyāḥ
in your company
bhavatyāḥ prema-yantritaḥ
prema-yantritaḥ
as if tied in love, although it is actually lust
ātmānaṁ nābhijānāmi
ātmānam
self-realization (what I am and what my duty is)
na abhijānāmi
I could not realize even until now
mohitas tava māyayā
mohitaḥ
being bewildered
tava
your
māyayā
by the materially attractive feature.
O my dear wife with beautiful eyebrows, I am exactly like that he-goat, for I am so poor in intelligence that I am captivated by your beauty and have forgotten the real task of self-realization.

If one remains a victim of the so-called beauty of his wife, his family life is nothing but a dark well. Hitvātma-pātaṁ gṛham andha-kūpam . Existence in such a dark well is certainly suicidal. If one wants relief from the miserable condition of material life, one must voluntarily give up his lusty relationship with his wife; otherwise there is no question of self-realization. Unless one is extremely advanced in spiritual consciousness, household life is nothing but a dark well in which one commits suicide. Prahlāda Mahārāja therefore recommended that in due time, at least after one’s fiftieth year, one must give up household life and go to the forest. Vanaṁ gato yad dharim āśrayeta . There one should seek shelter at the lotus feet of Hari.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O my dear wife with beautiful eyebrows! In a similar manner, I am a miser, controlled by love for you. Bewildered by your māyā, I do not know the self. I am bewildered by your māyā. I, the jīva, am bewildered by ignorance.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.13

↗
యత్ పృథివ్యాం వ్రీహియవం హిరణ్యం పశవ: స్త్రియ: । న దుహ్యన్తి మన:ప్రీతిం పుంస: కామహతస్య తే ॥ ౧౩ ॥
yat pṛthivyāṁ vrīhi-yavaṁ
[yat prithivyaam vreehi-yavam]
hiraṇyaṁ paśavaḥ striyaḥ
[hiranyam pashavah striyah]
na duhyanti manaḥ-prītiṁ
[na duhyanti manah-preetim]
puṁsaḥ kāma-hatasya te
[pumsah kaama-hatasya te]
yat — what pṛthivyām — within this world vrīhi — food grains, rice yavam — barley hiraṇyam — gold paśavaḥ — animals striyaḥ — wives or other women na duhyanti — do not give manaḥ-prītim — satisfaction of the mind puṁsaḥ — to a person kāma-hatasya — because of being victimized by lusty desires te — they.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yat pṛthivyāṁ vrīhi-yavaṁ
yat
what
pṛthivyām
within this world
vrīhi
food grains, rice
yavam
barley
hiraṇyaṁ paśavaḥ striyaḥ
hiraṇyam
gold
paśavaḥ
animals
striyaḥ
wives or other women
na duhyanti manaḥ-prītiṁ
na duhyanti
do not give
manaḥ-prītim
satisfaction of the mind
puṁsaḥ kāma-hatasya te
puṁsaḥ
to a person
kāma-hatasya
because of being victimized by lusty desires
te
they.
A person who is lusty cannot satisfy his mind even if he has enough of everything in this world, including rice, barley and other food grains, gold, animals and women. Nothing can satisfy him.

Improvement of one’s economic condition is the aim and object of a materialist, but there is no end to this material advancement, for if one cannot control his lusty desires, he will never be pleased, even if he gets all the material wealth of the world. In this age we see much material improvement, but still people are struggling to get more and more material opulence. Manaḥ ṣaṣṭhānīndriyāṇi prakṛti-sthāni karṣati . Although every living entity is a part of the Supreme Being, because of lusty desires one continuously struggles for so-called betterment of one’s economic condition. To have a satisfied mind, one must give up his heart disease of lusty desires. This can be done only when one is Kṛṣṇa conscious.

bhaktiṁ parāṁ bhagavati pratilabhya kāmaṁ hṛd-rogam āśv apahinoty acireṇa dhīraḥ

( Bhāg. 10.33.39 )

If one becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious, then he can give up this heart disease; otherwise this disease of lusty desires will continue, and one cannot have peace in his mind.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A person who is controlled by lust cannot satisfy his mind with anything in the world-, whether it is rice, barley and other food grains, gold, animals or women. “But you, the king, have everything. How can you be miserable, when you enjoy with happiness from so many sense objects?” For one stricken by lust, nothing satisfies. Being stricken with lust is the cause of not being full satisfied.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.14

↗
న జాతు కామ: కామానాముపభోగేన శామ్యతి । హవిషా కృష్ణవర్త్మేవ భూయ ఏవాభివర్ధతే ॥ ౧౪ ॥
na jātu kāmaḥ kāmānām
[na jaatu kaamah kaamaanaam]
upabhogena śāṁyati
[upabhogena shaamyati]
haviṣā kṛṣṇa-vartmeva
[havishaa krishna-vartmeva]
bhūya evābhivardhate
[bhooya evaabhivardhate]
na — not jātu — at any time kāmaḥ — lusty desires kāmānām — of persons who are very lusty upabhogena — by enjoyment of lusty desires śāṁyati — can be pacified haviṣā — by supplying butter kṛṣṇa-vartmā — fire iva — like bhūyaḥ — again and again eva — indeed abhivardhate — increases more and more.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na jātu kāmaḥ kāmānām
na
not
jātu
at any time
kāmaḥ
lusty desires
kāmānām
of persons who are very lusty
upabhogena śāṁyati
upabhogena
by enjoyment of lusty desires
śāṁyati
can be pacified
haviṣā kṛṣṇa-vartmeva
haviṣā
by supplying butter
kṛṣṇa-vartmā
fire
bhūya evābhivardhate
iva
like
bhūyaḥ
again and again
eva
indeed
abhivardhate
increases more and more.
As supplying butter to a fire does not diminish the fire but instead increases it more and more, the endeavor to stop lusty desires by continual enjoyment can never be successful. [In fact, one must voluntarily cease from material desires.]

One may have enough money and enough resources to satisfy the senses but still not be satisfied, for the endeavor to stop lusty desires by enjoying can never be successful. The example given here is very appropriate. One cannot stop a blazing fire by trying to extinguish it with butter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As fire increases more and more by supplying oblations, lust can never be pacified by enjoyment. “Whatever amount of lust you have, let it be satisfied by additional enjoyment! For you with great wealth, all the objects of enjoyment like women, garlands and sandalwood are small things.” Kṛṣṇa-vartmā means fire. Unsatisfied desire means constant sorrow. Satisfied desire alone is happiness.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.15

↗
యదా న కురుతే భావం సర్వభూతేష్వమఙ్గలమ్ । సమద‍ృష్టేస్తదా పుంస: సర్వా: సుఖమయా దిశ: ॥ ౧౫ ॥
yadā na kurute bhāvaṁ
[yadaa na kurute bhaavam]
sarva-bhūteṣv amaṅgalam
[sarva-bhooteshv amangalam]
sama-dṛṣṭes tadā puṁsaḥ
[sama-drishtes tadaa pumsah]
sarvāḥ sukhamayā diśaḥ
[sarvaah sukhamayaa dishah]
yadā — when na — not kurute — does bhāvam — a different attitude of attachment or envy sarva-bhūteṣu — to all living entities amaṅgalam — inauspicious sama-dṛṣṭeḥ — because of being equipoised tadā — at that time puṁsaḥ — of the person sarvāḥ — all sukha-mayāḥ — in a happy condition diśaḥ — directions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā na kurute bhāvaṁ
yadā
when
na
not
kurute
does
bhāvam
a different attitude of attachment or envy
sarva-bhūteṣv amaṅgalam
sarva-bhūteṣu
to all living entities
amaṅgalam
inauspicious
sama-dṛṣṭes tadā puṁsaḥ
sama-dṛṣṭeḥ
because of being equipoised
tadā
at that time
puṁsaḥ
of the person
sarvāḥ sukhamayā diśaḥ
sarvāḥ
all
sukha-mayāḥ
in a happy condition
diśaḥ
directions.
When a man is nonenvious and does not desire ill fortune for anyone, he is equipoised. For such a person, all directions appear happy.

Prabodhānanda Sarasvatī said, viśvaṁ pūrṇa-sukhāyate: when one becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious by the mercy of Lord Caitanya, for him the entire world appears happy, and he has nothing for which to hanker. On the brahma-bhūta stage, or the platform of spiritual realization, there is no lamentation and no material hankering ( na śocati na kāṅkṣati ). As long as one lives in the material world, actions and reactions will continue, but when one is unaffected by such material actions and reactions, he is to be considered free from the danger of being victimized by material desires. The symptoms of those who are satiated with lusty desires are described in this verse. As explained by Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, when one is not envious even of his enemy, does not expect honor from anyone, but instead desires all well-being even for his enemy, he is understood to be a paramahaṁsa, one who has fully subdued the lusty desires for sense gratification.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When a person does not show hatred to even his enemies, then all directions are filled with happiness for that person who sees all beings with equal vision. The remarkable quality of satisfied desire is described. When one does not show hatred (amaṅgalam) to other beings, even if they hate you, to those who do not show respect to but rather, disrespect you, all directions are blissful for that person who considers equally those who criticize or praise you. Sukhamayāḥ should be sukhamayyaḥ.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.16

↗
యా దుస్త్యజా దుర్మతిభిర్జీర్యతో యా న జీర్యతే । తాం తృష్ణాం దు:ఖనివహాం శర్మకామో ద్రుతం త్యజేత్ ॥ ౧౬ ॥
yā dustyajā durmatibhir
[yaa dustyajaa durmatibhir]
jīryato yā na jīryate
[jeeryato yaa na jeeryate]
tāṁ tṛṣṇāṁ duḥkha-nivahāṁ
[taam trishnaam duhkha-nivahaam]
śarma-kāmo drutaṁ tyajet
[sharma-kaamo drutam tyajet]
yā — that which dustyajā — extremely difficult to give up durmatibhiḥ — by persons too attached to material enjoyment jīryataḥ — even by one who is an invalid because of old age yā — that which na — not jīryate — is vanquished tām — such tṛṣṇām — desire duḥkha-nivahām — which is the cause of all tribulations śarma-kāmaḥ — a person desiring his own happiness drutam — very soon tyajet — should give up.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yā dustyajā durmatibhir
yā
that which
dustyajā
extremely difficult to give up
durmatibhiḥ
by persons too attached to material enjoyment
jīryato yā na jīryate
jīryataḥ
even by one who is an invalid because of old age
yā
that which
na
not
jīryate
is vanquished
tāṁ tṛṣṇāṁ duḥkha-nivahāṁ
tām
such
tṛṣṇām
desire
duḥkha-nivahām
which is the cause of all tribulations
śarma-kāmo drutaṁ tyajet
śarma-kāmaḥ
a person desiring his own happiness
drutam
very soon
tyajet
should give up.
For those who are too attached to material enjoyment, sense gratification is very difficult to give up. Even when one is an invalid because of old age, one cannot give up such desires for sense gratification. Therefore, one who actually desires happiness must give up such unsatisfied desires, which are the cause of all tribulations.

We have actually seen, especially in the Western countries, that men who have reached more than eighty years of age still go to nightclubs and pay heavy fees to drink wine and associate with women. Although such men are too old to enjoy anything, their desires have not ceased. Time deteriorates even the body itself, which is the medium for all sensual satisfaction, but even when a man becomes old and invalid, his desires are strong enough to dictate that he go here and there to satisfy the desires of his senses. Therefore, by the practice of bhakti-yoga, one should give up his lusty desires. As explained by Śrī Yāmunācārya:

yadavadhi mama cetaḥ kṛṣṇa-pādāravinde nava-nava-rasa-dhāmany udyataṁ rantum āsīt tadavadhi bata nārī-saṅgame smaryamāne bhavati mukha-vikāraḥ suṣṭhu-niṣṭhīvanaṁ ca

When one is Kṛṣṇa conscious, he gets more and more happiness by discharging duties for Kṛṣṇa. Such a person spits on sense gratification, especially that of sexual enjoyment. An experienced, advanced devotee is no longer interested in sex life. The strong desire for sex can be subdued only by advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Desire is difficult to give up for the unintelligent. Desire is not depleted even for persons who have reached old age. The person desiring good even for his enemies should quickly give up desire, the cause of misery. Even time, which destroys everything, does not destroy desire. Or the verse shows the means of pacifying desire even though it is difficult to do so. Desire is not given up even by persons who have attained old age (jīryatah). He who desires good even for his enemies (śarma-kāmaḥ) should give up desire.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.17

↗
మాత్రా స్వస్రా దుహిత్రా వా నావివిక్తాసనో భవేత్ । బలవానిన్ద్రియగ్రామో విద్వాంసమపి కర్షతి ॥ ౧౭ ॥
mātrā svasrā duhitrā vā
[maatraa svasraa duhitraa vaa]
nāviviktāsano bhavet
[naaviviktaasano bhavet]
balavān indriya-grāmo
[balavaan indriya-graamo]
vidvāṁsam api karṣati
[vidvaamsam api karshati]
mātrā — with one’s mother svasrā — with one’s sister duhitrā — with one’s own daughter vā — either na — not avivikta-āsanaḥ — seated closely on one seat bhavet — one should be balavān — very strong indriya-grāmaḥ — the group of senses vidvāṁsam — the very learned and advanced person api — even karṣati — agitates.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mātrā svasrā duhitrā vā
mātrā
with one’s mother
svasrā
with one’s sister
duhitrā
with one’s own daughter
vā
either
nāviviktāsano bhavet
na
not
avivikta-āsanaḥ
seated closely on one seat
bhavet
one should be
balavān indriya-grāmo
balavān
very strong
indriya-grāmaḥ
the group of senses
vidvāṁsam api karṣati
vidvāṁsam
the very learned and advanced person
api
even
karṣati
agitates.
One should not allow oneself to sit on the same seat even with one’s own mother, sister or daughter, for the senses are so strong that even though one is very advanced in knowledge, he may be attracted by sex.

Learning the etiquette of how to deal with women does not free one from sexual attraction. As specifically mentioned herewith, such attraction is possible even with one’s mother, sister or daughter. Generally, of course, one is not sexually attracted to his mother, sister or daughter, but if one allows himself to sit very close to such a woman, one may be attracted. This is a psychological fact. It may be said that one is liable to be attracted if he is not very advanced in civilized life; however, as specifically mentioned here, vidvāṁsam api karṣati: even if one is highly advanced, materially or spiritually, he may be attracted by lusty desires. The object of attraction may even be one’s mother, sister or daughter. Therefore, one should be extremely careful in dealings with women. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was most strict in such dealings, especially after He accepted the sannyāsa order. Indeed, no woman could come near Him to offer Him respect. Again, one is warned herewith that one should be extremely careful in dealings with women. A brahmacārī is forbidden even to see the wife of his spiritual master if she happens to be young. The wife of the spiritual master may sometimes take some service from the disciple of her husband, as she would from a son, but if the wife of the spiritual master is young, a brahmacārī is forbidden to render service to her.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One should not allow oneself to sit together with one's own mother, sister or daughter. The strong senses pull even the man of knowledge. Desire for women is controlled by proper conduct. Proper conduct is shown. Aviviktāsanaḥ means a person who sits on the seat. The senses draw even the man with knowledge.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.18

↗
పూర్ణం వర్షసహస్రం మే విషయాన్ సేవతోఽసకృత్ । తథాపి చానుసవనం తృష్ణా తేషూపజాయతే ॥ ౧౮ ॥
pūrṇaṁ varṣa-sahasraṁ me
[poornam varsha-sahasram me]
viṣayān sevato ’sakṛt
[vishayaan sevato ’sakrit]
tathāpi cānusavanaṁ
[tathaapi chaanusavanam]
tṛṣṇā teṣūpajāyate
[trishnaa teshoopajaayate]
pūrṇam — completely varṣa-sahasram — one thousand years me — my viṣayān — sense gratification sevataḥ — enjoying asakṛt — without cessation, continuously tathā api — still ca — indeed anusavanam — more and more tṛṣṇā — lusty desires teṣu — in sense gratification upajāyate — are increased.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pūrṇaṁ varṣa-sahasraṁ me
pūrṇam
completely
varṣa-sahasram
one thousand years
me
my
viṣayān sevato ’sakṛt
viṣayān
sense gratification
sevataḥ
enjoying
asakṛt
without cessation, continuously
tathāpi cānusavanaṁ
tathā api
still
ca
indeed
anusavanam
more and more
tṛṣṇā teṣūpajāyate
tṛṣṇā
lusty desires
teṣu
in sense gratification
upajāyate
are increased.
I have spent a full one thousand years enjoying sense gratification, yet my desire to enjoy such pleasure increases daily.

Mahārāja Yayāti is explaining, in terms of his actual experience, how strong are sexual desires, even in old age.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though I have spent a full one thousand years enjoying, my desire to enjoy such pleasure increases daily. I am an example showing that even time does not rid a person of attachment to enjoyment.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.19

↗
తస్మాదేతామహం త్యక్త్వా బ్రహ్మణ్యధ్యాయ మానసమ్ । నిర్ద్వన్ద్వో నిరహఙ్కారశ్చరిష్యామి మృగై: సహ ॥ ౧౯ ॥
tasmād etām ahaṁ tyaktvā
[tasmaad etaam aham tyaktvaa]
brahmaṇy adhyāya mānasam
[brahmany adhyaaya maanasam]
nirdvandvo nirahaṅkāraś
[nirdvandvo nirahankaarash]
cariṣyāmi mṛgaiḥ saha
[charishyaami mrigaih saha]
tasmāt — therefore etām — such strong desires for lusty affairs aham — I tyaktvā — giving up brahmaṇi — upon the Supreme Absolute Truth adhyāya — fixing mānasam — the mind nirdvandvaḥ — without duality nirahaṅkāraḥ — without an identity of false prestige cariṣyāmi — I shall loiter or wander in the forest mṛgaiḥ saha — with the forest animals.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmād etām ahaṁ tyaktvā
tasmāt
therefore
etām
such strong desires for lusty affairs
aham
I
tyaktvā
giving up
brahmaṇy adhyāya mānasam
brahmaṇi
upon the Supreme Absolute Truth
adhyāya
fixing
mānasam
the mind
nirdvandvo nirahaṅkāraś
nirdvandvaḥ
without duality
nirahaṅkāraḥ
without an identity of false prestige
cariṣyāmi mṛgaiḥ saha
cariṣyāmi
I shall loiter or wander in the forest
mṛgaiḥ saha
with the forest animals.
Therefore, I shall now give up all these desires and meditate upon the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Free from the dualities of mental concoction and free from false prestige, I shall wander in the forest with the animals.

To go to the forest and live there with the animals, meditating upon the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is the only means by which to give up lusty desires. Unless one gives up such desires, one’s mind cannot be freed from material contamination. Therefore, if one is at all interested in being freed from the bondage of repeated birth, death, old age and disease, after a certain age one must go to the forest. Paṣcāśordhvaṁ vanaṁ vrajet . After fifty years of age, one should voluntarily give up family life and go to the forest. The best forest is Vṛndāvana, where one need not live with the animals but can associate with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who never leaves Vṛndāvana. Cultivating Kṛṣṇa consciousness in Vṛndāvana is the best means of being liberated from material bondage, for in Vṛndāvana one can automatically meditate upon Kṛṣṇa. Vṛndāvana has many temples, and in one or more of these temples one may see the form of the Supreme Lord as Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa or Kṛṣṇa-Balarāma and meditate upon this form. As expressed here by the words brahmaṇy adhyāya, one should concentrate one’s mind upon the Supreme Lord, Parabrahman. This Parabrahman is Kṛṣṇa, as confirmed by Arjuna in Bhagavad-gītā ( paraṁ brahma paraṁ dhāma pavitraṁ paramaṁ bhavān ). Kṛṣṇa and His abode, Vṛndāvana, are not different. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said, ārādhyo bhagavān vrajeśa-tanayas tad-dhāma vṛndāvanam. Vṛndāvana is as good as Kṛṣṇa. Therefore, if one somehow or other gets the opportunity to live in Vṛndāvana, and if one is not a pretender but simply lives in Vṛndāvana and concentrates his mind upon Kṛṣṇa, one is liberated from material bondage. One’s mind is not purified, however, even in Vṛndāvana, if one is agitated by lusty desires. One should not live in Vṛndāvana and commit offenses, for a life of offenses in Vṛndāvana is no better than the lives of the monkeys and hogs there. Many monkeys and hogs live in Vṛndāvana, and they are concerned with their sexual desires. Men who have gone to Vṛndāvana but who still hanker for sex should immediately leave Vṛndāvana and stop their grievous offenses at the lotus feet of the Lord. There are many misguided men who live in Vṛndāvana to satisfy their sexual desires, but they are certainly no better than the monkeys and hogs. Those who are under the control of māyā, and specifically under the control of lusty desires, are called māyā-mṛga. Indeed, everyone in the conditional stage of material life is a māyā-mṛga. It is said, māyā-mṛgaṁ dayitayepsitam anvadhāvad: Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu took sannyāsa to show His causeless mercy to the māyā-mṛgas, the people of this material world, who suffer because of lusty desires. One should follow the principles of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and always think of Kṛṣṇa in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Then one will be eligible to live in Vṛndāvana, and his life will be successful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore, giving up all these desires and fixing my mind on the Lord, and being free from dualities and false identity, I shall wander in the forest with the animals. “Then how should one become relieved of desire?” One should concentrate the mind on the form and qualities of the Lord. One cannot meditate on something without form. Brahman in this case must mean Brahman with form. Later it is said that Yayāti achieved the Lord. Till this time I have been your play animal, dancing in the yard of our house. Now, I will dance with the kṛṣṇa-sāra deer, while absorbed in the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.20

↗
ద‍ృష్టం శ్రుతమసద్బుద్ధ్వా నానుధ్యాయేన్న సన్దిశేత్ । సంసృతిం చాత్మనాశం చ తత్ర విద్వాన్ స ఆత్మద‍ృక్ ॥ ౨౦ ॥
dṛṣṭaṁ śrutam asad buddhvā
[drishtam shrutam asad buddhvaa]
nānudhyāyen na sandiśet
[naanudhyaayen na sandishet]
saṁsṛtiṁ cātma-nāśaṁ ca
[samsritim chaatma-naasham cha]
tatra vidvān sa ātma-dṛk
[tatra vidvaan sa aatma-drik]
dṛṣṭam — the material enjoyment we experience in our present life śrutam — material enjoyment as promised to the fruitive workers for future happiness (either in this life or in the next, in the heavenly planets and so on) asat — all temporary and bad buddhvā — knowing na — not anudhyāyet — one should even think of na — nor sandiśet — should actually enjoy saṁsṛtim — prolongation of material existence ca — and ātma-nāśam — forgetfulness of one’s own constitutional position ca — as well as tatra — in such a subject matter vidvān — one who is completely aware saḥ — such a person ātma-dṛk — a self-realized soul.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛṣṭaṁ śrutam asad buddhvā
dṛṣṭam
the material enjoyment we experience in our present life
śrutam
material enjoyment as promised to the fruitive workers for future happiness (either in this life or in the next, in the heavenly planets and so on)
asat
all temporary and bad
buddhvā
knowing
nānudhyāyen na sandiśet
na
not
anudhyāyet
one should even think of
na
nor
sandiśet
should actually enjoy
saṁsṛtiṁ cātma-nāśaṁ ca
saṁsṛtim
prolongation of material existence
ca
and
ātma-nāśam
forgetfulness of one’s own constitutional position
ca
as well as
tatra vidvān sa ātma-dṛk
tatra
in such a subject matter
vidvān
one who is completely aware
saḥ
such a person
ātma-dṛk
a self-realized soul.
One who knows that material happiness, whether good or bad, in this life or in the next, on this planet or on the heavenly planets, is temporary and useless, and that an intelligent person should not try to enjoy or even think of such things, is the knower of the self. Such a self-realized person knows quite well that material happiness is the very cause of continued material existence and forgetfulness of one’s own constitutional position.

The living entity is a spiritual soul, and the material body is his encagement. This is the beginning of spiritual understanding.

dehino ’smin yathā dehe kaumāraṁ yauvanaṁ jarā tathā dehāntara-prāptir dhīras tatra na muhyati

“As the embodied soul continually passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. The self-realized soul is not bewildered by such a change.” ( Bg. 2.13 ) The real mission of human life is to get free from encagement in the material body. Therefore Kṛṣṇa descends to teach the conditioned soul about spiritual realization and how to become free from material bondage. Yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati bhārata. The words dharmasya glāniḥ mean “pollution of one’s existence.” Our existence is now polluted, and it must be purified ( sattvaṁ śuddhyet ). The human life is meant for this purification, not for thinking of happiness in terms of the external body, which is the cause of material bondage. Therefore, in this verse, Mahārāja Yayāti advises that whatever material happiness we see and whatever is promised for enjoyment is all merely flickering and temporary. Ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino ’rjuna. Even if one is promoted to Brahmaloka, if one is not freed from material bondage one must return to this planet earth and continue in the miserable condition of material existence ( bhūtvā bhūtvā pralīyate ). One should always keep this understanding in mind so as not to be allured by any kind of sense enjoyment, in this life or in the next. One who is fully aware of this truth is self-realized ( sa ātma-dṛk ), but aside from him, everyone suffers in the cycle of birth and death ( mṛtyu-saṁsāra-vartmani ). This understanding is one of true intelligence, and anything contrary to this is but a cause of unhappiness. Kṛṣṇa-bhakta — niṣkāma, ataeva ‘śānta. ’ Only a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, who knows the aim and object of life, is peaceful. All others, whether karmīs, jṣānīs or yogīs, are restless and cannot enjoy real peace.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing the Supreme Lord, and thus having understood the temporary nature of material enjoyment either seen or heard, a person gives up that enjoyment and does not speak about it. He knows that meditating on enjoyment produces rebirth and destruction of spiritual consciousness. It is possible to give up thinking of material enjoyment by contemplating the truth when one achieves maturity in meditation on the Supreme Lord. He who sees the Lord by meditation (ātmā-dṛk), thus understanding the tastelessness of material happiness either seen or heard, does not constantly meditate on those objects (anudhyāyet), does not enjoy those objects, since it is improper. He knows (vidvān) that meditating on material objects (tatra) will produce saṁsāra and destruction spiritual consciousness.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.21

↗
ఇత్యుక్త్వా నాహుషో జాయాం తదీయం పూరవే వయ: । దత్త్వా స్వజరసం తస్మాదాదదే విగతస్పృహ: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
ity uktvā nāhuṣo jāyāṁ
[ity uktvaa naahusho jaayaam]
tadīyaṁ pūrave vayaḥ
[tadeeyam poorave vayah]
dattvā sva-jarasaṁ tasmād
[dattvaa sva-jarasam tasmaad]
ādade vigata-spṛhaḥ
[aadade vigata-sprihah]
iti uktvā — saying this nāhuṣaḥ — Mahārāja Yayāti, the son of King Nahuṣa jāyām — unto his wife, Devayānī tadīyam — his own pūrave — unto his son Pūru vayaḥ — youth dattvā — delivering sva-jarasam — his own invalidity and old age tasmāt — from him ādade — took back vigata-spṛhaḥ — being freed from all material lusty desires.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity uktvā nāhuṣo jāyāṁ
iti uktvā
saying this
nāhuṣaḥ
Mahārāja Yayāti, the son of King Nahuṣa
jāyām
unto his wife, Devayānī
tadīyaṁ pūrave vayaḥ
tadīyam
his own
pūrave
unto his son Pūru
vayaḥ
youth
dattvā sva-jarasaṁ tasmād
dattvā
delivering
sva-jarasam
his own invalidity and old age
tasmāt
from him
ādade
took back
ādade vigata-spṛhaḥ
vigata-spṛhaḥ
being freed from all material lusty desires.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: After speaking in this way to his wife, Devayānī, King Yayāti, who was now free from all material desires, called his youngest son, Pūru, and returned Pūru’s youth in exchange for his own old age.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After speaking in this way to his wife, King Yayāti, who was now free from all material desires, gave his youth to Pūru, and accepted his own old age.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.22

↗
దిశి దక్షిణపూర్వస్యాం ద్రుహ్యుం దక్షిణతో యదుమ్ । ప్రతీచ్యాం తుర్వసుం చక్ర ఉదీచ్యామనుమీశ్వరమ్ ॥ ౨౨ ॥
diśi dakṣiṇa-pūrvasyāṁ
[dishi dakshina-poorvasyaam]
druhyuṁ dakṣiṇato yadum
[druhyum dakshinato yadum]
pratīcyāṁ turvasuṁ cakra
[prateechyaam turvasum chakra]
udīcyām anum īśvaram
[udeechyaam anum eeshvaram]
diśi — in the direction dakṣiṇa-pūrvasyām — southeast druhyum — his son named Druhyu dakṣiṇataḥ — in the southern side of the world yadum — Yadu pratīcyām — in the western side of the world turvasum — his son known as Turvasu cakre — he made udīcyām — in the northern side of the world anum — his son named Anu īśvaram — the King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
diśi dakṣiṇa-pūrvasyāṁ
diśi
in the direction
dakṣiṇa-pūrvasyām
southeast
druhyuṁ dakṣiṇato yadum
druhyum
his son named Druhyu
dakṣiṇataḥ
in the southern side of the world
yadum
Yadu
pratīcyāṁ turvasuṁ cakra
pratīcyām
in the western side of the world
turvasum
his son known as Turvasu
cakre
he made
udīcyām anum īśvaram
udīcyām
in the northern side of the world
anum
his son named Anu
īśvaram
the King.
King Yayāti gave the southeast to his son Druhyu, the south to his son Yadu, the west to his son Turvasu, and the north to his son Anu. In this way he divided the kingdom.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Yayāti made Druhyu the ruler of the southeast, Yadu the ruler of the south, Turvasu the ruler of the west, and Anu the ruler of the north.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.23

↗
భూమణ్డలస్య సర్వస్య పూరుమర్హత్తమం విశామ్ । అభిషిచ్యాగ్రజాంస్తస్య వశే స్థాప్య వనం యయౌ ॥ ౨౩ ॥
bhū-maṇḍalasya sarvasya
[bhoo-mandalasya sarvasya]
pūrum arhattamaṁ viśām
[poorum arhattamam vishaam]
abhiṣicyāgrajāṁs tasya
[abhishichyaagrajaams tasya]
vaśe sthāpya vanaṁ yayau
[vashe sthaapya vanam yayau]
bhū-maṇḍalasya — of the entire planet earth sarvasya — of all wealth and riches pūrum — his youngest son, Pūru arhat-tamam — the most worshipable person, the king viśām — of the citizens or the subjects of the world abhiṣicya — crowning on the throne of the emperor agrajān — all his elder brothers, beginning from Yadu tasya — of Pūru vaśe — under the control sthāpya — establishing vanam — in the forest yayau — he went away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhū-maṇḍalasya sarvasya
bhū-maṇḍalasya
of the entire planet earth
sarvasya
of all wealth and riches
pūrum arhattamaṁ viśām
pūrum
his youngest son, Pūru
arhat-tamam
the most worshipable person, the king
viśām
of the citizens or the subjects of the world
abhiṣicyāgrajāṁs tasya
abhiṣicya
crowning on the throne of the emperor
agrajān
all his elder brothers, beginning from Yadu
tasya
of Pūru
vaśe sthāpya vanaṁ yayau
vaśe
under the control
sthāpya
establishing
vanam
in the forest
yayau
he went away.
Yayāti enthroned his youngest son, Pūru, as the emperor of the entire world and the proprietor of all its riches, and he placed all the other sons, who were older than Pūru, under Pūru’s control.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Yayāti enthroned his youngest son, Pūru, as the emperor of the earth and the proprietor of all its riches and he placed all the other sons, who were older than Pūru, under Pūru's control. Then he went to the forest. He enthroned Pūru as the most worthy (arhattamam) of the wealth (viśām) of the whole world.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.24

↗
ఆసేవితం వర్షపూగాన్ షడ్‍వర్గం విషయేషు స: । క్షణేన ముముచే నీడం జాతపక్ష ఇవ ద్విజ: ॥ ౨౪ ॥
āsevitaṁ varṣa-pūgān
[aasevitam varsha-poogaan]
ṣaḍ-vargaṁ viṣayeṣu saḥ
[shad-vargam vishayeshu sah]
kṣaṇena mumuce nīḍaṁ
[kshanena mumuche needam]
jāta-pakṣa iva dvijaḥ
[jaata-paksha iva dvijah]
āsevitam — being always engaged in varṣa-pūgān — for many, many years ṣaṭ-vargam — the six senses, including the mind viṣayeṣu — in sense enjoyment saḥ — King Yayāti kṣaṇena — within a moment mumuce — gave up nīḍam — nest jāta-pakṣaḥ — one that has grown its wings iva — like dvijaḥ — a bird.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āsevitaṁ varṣa-pūgān
āsevitam
being always engaged in
varṣa-pūgān
for many, many years
ṣaḍ-vargaṁ viṣayeṣu saḥ
ṣaṭ-vargam
the six senses, including the mind
viṣayeṣu
in sense enjoyment
saḥ
King Yayāti
kṣaṇena mumuce nīḍaṁ
kṣaṇena
within a moment
mumuce
gave up
nīḍam
nest
jāta-pakṣa iva dvijaḥ
jāta-pakṣaḥ
one that has grown its wings
iva
like
dvijaḥ
a bird.
Having enjoyed sense gratification for many, many years, O King Parīkṣit, Yayāti was accustomed to it, but he gave it up entirely in a moment, just as a bird flies away from the nest as soon as its wings have grown.

That Mahārāja Yayāti was immediately liberated from the bondage of conditioned life is certainly astonishing. But the example given herewith is appropriate. A tiny baby bird, dependent fully on its father and mother even to eat, suddenly flies away from the nest when its wings have grown. Similarly, if one fully surrenders to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one is immediately liberated from the bondage of conditioned life, as promised by the Lord Himself ( ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi ). As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (2.4.18) :

kirāta-hūṇāndhra-pulinda-pulkaśā ābhīra-śumbhā yavanāḥ khasādayaḥ ye ’nye ca pāpā yad-apāśrayāśrayāḥ śudhyanti tasmai prabhaviṣṇave namaḥ

“Kirāta, Hūṇa, Āndhra, Pulinda, Pulkaśa, Ābhīra, Śumbha, Yavana and the Khasa races and even others addicted to sinful acts can be purified by taking shelter of the devotees of the Lord, for He is the supreme power. I beg to offer my respectful obeisances unto Him.” Lord Viṣṇu is so powerful that He can deliver anyone at once if He is pleased to do so. And Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, can be pleased immediately if we accept His order by surrendering unto Him, as Mahārāja Yayāti did. Mahārāja Yayāti was eager to serve Vāsudeva, Kṛṣṇa, and therefore as soon as he wanted to renounce material life, Lord Vāsudeva helped him. We must therefore be very sincere in surrendering ourselves unto the lotus feet of the Lord. Then we can immediately be liberated from all the bondage of conditioned life. This is clearly expressed in the next verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In a moment Yayāti became indifferent to the six senses which had been attached to enjoyment for many years, just as a bird, on growing wings, is not dependent on the nest. He gave up in a moment the six senses which were completely attached to sense objects for many years. He became indifferent to them. He was not dependent on his senses, just as a bird, on growing wings, is not dependent on the nest.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.25

↗
స తత్ర నిర్ముక్తసమస్తసఙ్గ ఆత్మానుభూత్యా విధుతత్రిలిఙ్గ: । పరేఽమలే బ్రహ్మణి వాసుదేవే లేభే గతిం భాగవతీం ప్రతీత: ॥ ౨౫ ॥
sa tatra nirmukta-samasta-saṅga
[sa tatra nirmukta-samasta-sanga]
ātmānubhūtyā vidhuta-triliṅgaḥ
[aatmaanubhootyaa vidhuta-trilingah]
pare ’male brahmaṇi vāsudeve
[pare ’male brahmani vaasudeve]
lebhe gatiṁ bhāgavatīṁ pratītaḥ
[lebhe gatim bhaagavateem prateetah]
saḥ — Mahārāja Yayāti tatra — upon doing this nirmukta — was immediately liberated from samasta-saṅgaḥ — all contamination ātma-anubhūtyā — simply by understanding his constitutional position vidhuta — was cleansed of tri-liṅgaḥ — the contamination caused by the three modes of material nature (sattva-guṇa, rajo-guṇa and tamo-guṇa) pare — unto the Transcendence amale — without material contact brahmaṇi — the Supreme Lord vāsudeve — Vāsudeva, Kṛṣṇa, the Absolute Truth, Bhagavān lebhe — achieved gatim — the destination bhāgavatīm — as an associate of the Supreme Personality of Godhead pratītaḥ — famous.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa tatra nirmukta-samasta-saṅga
saḥ
Mahārāja Yayāti
tatra
upon doing this
nirmukta
was immediately liberated from
samasta-saṅgaḥ
all contamination
ātmānubhūtyā vidhuta-triliṅgaḥ
ātma-anubhūtyā
simply by understanding his constitutional position
vidhuta
was cleansed of
tri-liṅgaḥ
the contamination caused by the three modes of material nature (sattva-guṇa, rajo-guṇa and tamo-guṇa)
pare ’male brahmaṇi vāsudeve
pare
unto the Transcendence
amale
without material contact
brahmaṇi
the Supreme Lord
vāsudeve
Vāsudeva, Kṛṣṇa, the Absolute Truth, Bhagavān
lebhe gatiṁ bhāgavatīṁ pratītaḥ
lebhe
achieved
gatim
the destination
bhāgavatīm
as an associate of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
pratītaḥ
famous.
Because King Yayāti completely surrendered unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva, he was freed from all contamination of the material modes of nature. Because of his self-realization, he was able to fix his mind upon the Transcendence [Parabrahman, Vāsudeva], and thus he ultimately achieved the position of an associate of the Lord.

The word vidhuta, meaning “cleansed,” is very significant. Everyone in this material world is contaminated ( kāraṇaṁ guṇa-saṅgo ’sya ). Because we are in a material condition, we are contaminated either by sattva-guṇa, by rajo-guṇa or by tamo-guṇa. Even if one becomes a qualified brāhmaṇa in the mode of goodness ( sattva-guṇa ), he is still materially contaminated. One must come to the platform of śuddha-sattva, transcending the sattva-guṇa. Then one is vidhuta-triliṅga, cleansed of the contamination caused by the three modes of material nature. This is possible by the mercy of Kṛṣṇa. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.17) :

śṛṇvatāṁ sva-kathāḥ kṛṣṇaḥ puṇya-śravaṇa-kīrtanaḥ hṛdy antaḥ-stho hy abhadrāṇi vidhunoti suhṛt-satām

“Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, who is the Paramātmā [Supersoul] in everyone’s heart and the benefactor of the truthful devotee, cleanses desire for material enjoyment from the heart of the devotee who has developed the urge to hear His messages, which are in themselves virtuous when properly heard and chanted.” A person trying to be perfectly Kṛṣṇa conscious by hearing the words of Kṛṣṇa from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam or Bhagavad-gītā certainly has all the dirty things cleansed from the core of his heart. Caitanya Mahāprabhu also says, ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam: the process of hearing and chanting the glories of the Supreme Lord washes away the dirty things accumulated in the core of the heart. As soon as one is freed from all the dirt of material contamination, as Mahārāja Yayāti was, one’s original position as an associate of the Lord is revealed. This is called svarūpa-siddhi, or personal perfection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Yayāti, free of all material association by realization of the Lord and purified of the three guṇas, became famous, attaining a spiritual body in the Lord’s abode. He had been purified of the subtle body made of the three guṇas. He was famous, and attained the position of an associate of the Lord with prema (bhāgavatīm gatim), situated in the abode of the Lord.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.26

↗
శ్రుత్వా గాథాం దేవయానీ మేనే ప్రస్తోభమాత్మన: । స్త్రీపుంసో: స్‍నేహవైక్లవ్యాత్ పరిహాసమివేరితమ్ ॥ ౨౬ ॥
śrutvā gāthāṁ devayānī
[shrutvaa gaathaam devayaanee]
mene prastobham ātmanaḥ
[mene prastobham aatmanah]
strī-puṁsoḥ sneha-vaiklavyāt
[stree-pumsoh sneha-vaiklavyaat]
parihāsam iveritam
[parihaasam iveritam]
śrutvā — hearing gāthām — the narration devayānī — Queen Devayānī, the wife of Mahārāja Yayāti mene — understood prastobham ātmanaḥ — when instructed for her self-realization strī-puṁsoḥ — between the husband and wife sneha-vaiklavyāt — from an exchange of love and affection parihāsam — a funny joke or story iva — like īritam — spoken (by Mahārāja Yayāti).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrutvā gāthāṁ devayānī
śrutvā
hearing
gāthām
the narration
devayānī
Queen Devayānī, the wife of Mahārāja Yayāti
mene prastobham ātmanaḥ
mene
understood
prastobham ātmanaḥ
when instructed for her self-realization
strī-puṁsoḥ sneha-vaiklavyāt
strī-puṁsoḥ
between the husband and wife
sneha-vaiklavyāt
from an exchange of love and affection
parihāsam iveritam
parihāsam
a funny joke or story
iva
like
īritam
spoken (by Mahārāja Yayāti).
When Devayānī heard Mahārāja Yayāti’s story of the he-goat and she-goat, she understood that this story, which was presented as if a funny joke for entertainment between husband and wife, was intended to awaken her to her constitutional position.

When one actually awakens from material life, one understands his real position as an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa. This is called liberation. Muktir hitvānyathā rūpaṁ svarūpeṇa vyavasthitiḥ ( Bhāg. 2.10.6 ). Under the influence of māyā, everyone living in this material world thinks that he is the master of everything ( ahaṅkāra-vimūḍhātmā kartāham iti manyate ). One thinks that there is no God or controller and that one is independent and can do anything. This is the material condition, and when one awakens from this ignorance, he is called liberated. Mahārāja Yayāti had delivered Devayānī from the well, and finally, as a dutiful husband, he instructed her with the story about the he-goat and she-goat and thus delivered her from the misconception of material happiness. Devayānī was quite competent to understand her liberated husband, and therefore she decided to follow him as his faithful wife.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Devayānī heard Mahārāja Yayāti's story of the he-goat and she-goat, she understood that this story, which was presented as if a joke between husband and wife out of affection, was a censure of herself. She understood that the story of the goat was actually a censure of herself. It was told as a joke between husband and wife out of bewildering affection. O Devayānī! You have completely repaid me for mercifully lifting you from the well, for I have fallen into the blind well of material enjoyment for so long.” Devayānī understood that this what Yayāti was saying.
Related verses
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.27-28

↗
సా సన్నివాసం సుహృదాం ప్రపాయామివ గచ్ఛతామ్ । విజ్ఞాయేశ్వరతన్త్రాణాం మాయావిరచితం ప్రభో: ॥ ౨౭ ॥ సర్వత్ర సఙ్గముత్సృజ్య స్వప్నౌపమ్యేన భార్గవీ । కృష్ణే మన: సమావేశ్య వ్యధునోల్లిఙ్గమాత్మన: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
sā sannivāsaṁ suhṛdāṁ
[saa sannivaasam suhridaam]
prapāyām iva gacchatām
[prapaayaam iva gachchataam]
vijṣāyeśvara-tantrāṇāṁ
[vijshaayeshvara-tantraanaam]
māyā-viracitaṁ prabhoḥ
[maayaa-virachitam prabhoh]
sarvatra saṅgam utsṛjya
[sarvatra sangam utsrijya]
svapnaupamyena bhārgavī
[svapnaupamyena bhaargavee]
kṛṣṇe manaḥ samāveśya
[krishne manah samaaveshya]
vyadhunol liṅgam ātmanaḥ
[vyadhunol lingam aatmanah]
sā — Devayānī sannivāsam — living in the association suhṛdām — of friends and relatives prapāyām — in a place where water is supplied iva — like gacchatām — of tourists on a program for going from one place to another vijṣāya — understanding īśvara-tantrāṇām — under the influence of the rigid laws of nature māyā-viracitam — the laws enforced by māyā, the illusory energy prabhoḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead sarvatra — everywhere in this material world saṅgam — association utsṛjya — giving up svapna-aupamyena — by the analogy of a dream bhārgavī — Devayānī, the daughter of Śukrācārya kṛṣṇe — unto Lord Kṛṣṇa manaḥ — complete attention samāveśya — fixing vyadhunot — gave up liṅgam — the gross and subtle bodies ātmanaḥ — of the soul.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sā sannivāsaṁ suhṛdāṁ
sā
Devayānī
sannivāsam
living in the association
suhṛdām
of friends and relatives
prapāyām iva gacchatām
prapāyām
in a place where water is supplied
iva
like
gacchatām
of tourists on a program for going from one place to another
vijṣāyeśvara-tantrāṇāṁ
vijṣāya
understanding
īśvara-tantrāṇām
under the influence of the rigid laws of nature
māyā-viracitaṁ prabhoḥ
māyā-viracitam
the laws enforced by māyā, the illusory energy
prabhoḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
sarvatra saṅgam utsṛjya
sarvatra
everywhere in this material world
saṅgam
association
utsṛjya
giving up
svapnaupamyena bhārgavī
svapna-aupamyena
by the analogy of a dream
bhārgavī
Devayānī, the daughter of Śukrācārya
kṛṣṇe manaḥ samāveśya
kṛṣṇe
unto Lord Kṛṣṇa
manaḥ
complete attention
samāveśya
fixing
vyadhunol liṅgam ātmanaḥ
vyadhunot
gave up
liṅgam
the gross and subtle bodies
ātmanaḥ
of the soul.
Thereafter, Devayānī, the daughter of Śukrācārya, understood that the materialistic association of husband, friends and relatives is like the association in a hotel full of tourists. The relationships of society, friendship and love are created by the māyā of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, exactly as in a dream. By the grace of Kṛṣṇa, Devayānī gave up her imaginary position in the material world. Completely fixing her mind upon Kṛṣṇa, she achieved liberation from the gross and subtle bodies.

One should be convinced that he is a spirit soul, part and parcel of the Supreme Brahman, Kṛṣṇa, but has somehow or other been entrapped by the material coverings of the gross and subtle bodies, consisting of earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego. One should know that the association of society, friendship, love, nationalism, religion and so on are nothing but creations of māyā. One’s only business is to become Kṛṣṇa conscious and render service unto Kṛṣṇa as extensively as possible for a living being. In this way one is liberated from material bondage. By the grace of Kṛṣṇa, Devayānī attained this state through the instructions of her husband.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understanding that association of friends, created by the Lord’s māyā, was like going to a water hole, she gave up that association completely, and concentrating her mind on Kṛṣṇa, gave up the subtle body covering the soul. Prabhoḥ means “of the Lord.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.19.29

↗
నమస్తుభ్యం భగవతే వాసుదేవాయ వేధసే । సర్వభూతాధివాసాయ శాన్తాయ బృహతే నమ: ॥ ౨౯ ॥
namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
[namas tubhyam bhagavate]
vāsudevāya vedhase
[vaasudevaaya vedhase]
sarva-bhūtādhivāsāya
[sarva-bhootaadhivaasaaya]
śāntāya bṛhate namaḥ
[shaantaaya brihate namah]
namaḥ — I offer my respectful obeisances tubhyam — unto You bhagavate — the Supreme Personality of Godhead vāsudevāya — Lord Vāsudeva vedhase — the creator of everything sarva-bhūta-adhivāsāya — present everywhere (within the heart of every living entity and within the atom also) śāntāya — peaceful, as if completely inactive bṛhate — the greatest of all namaḥ — I offer my respectful obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
namaḥ
I offer my respectful obeisances
tubhyam
unto You
bhagavate
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
vāsudevāya vedhase
vāsudevāya
Lord Vāsudeva
vedhase
the creator of everything
sarva-bhūtādhivāsāya
sarva-bhūta-adhivāsāya
present everywhere (within the heart of every living entity and within the atom also)
śāntāya
peaceful, as if completely inactive
śāntāya bṛhate namaḥ
bṛhate
the greatest of all
namaḥ
I offer my respectful obeisances.
O Lord Vāsudeva, O Supreme Personality of Godhead, You are the creator of the entire cosmic manifestation. You live as the Supersoul in everyone’s heart and are smaller than the smallest, yet You are greater than the greatest and are all-pervading. You appear completely silent, having nothing to do, but this is due to Your all-pervading nature and Your fullness in all opulences. I therefore offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

How Devayānī became self-realized by the grace of her great husband, Mahārāja Yayāti, is described here. Describing such realization is another way of performing the bhakti process.

śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇaṁ pāda-sevanam arcanaṁ vandanaṁ dāsyaṁ sakhyam ātma-nivedanam

“Hearing and chanting about the transcendental holy name, form, qualities, paraphernalia and pastimes of Lord Viṣṇu, remembering them, serving the lotus feet of the Lord, offering the Lord respectful worship, offering prayers to the Lord, becoming His servant, considering the Lord one’s best friend, and surrendering everything unto Him — these nine processes are accepted as pure devotional service.” ( Bhāg. 7.5.23) Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam, hearing and chanting, are especially important. By hearing from her husband about the greatness of Lord Vāsudeva, Devayānī certainly became convinced and surrendered herself unto the lotus feet of the Lord ( oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya ). This is knowledge. Bahūnāṁ janmanām ante jṣānavān māṁ prapadyate. Surrender to Vāsudeva is the result of hearing about Him for many, many births. As soon as one surrenders unto Vāsudeva, one is liberated immediately. Because of her association with her great husband, Mahārāja Yayāti, Devayānī became purified, adopted the means of bhakti-yoga, and thus became liberated.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Ninth Canto, Nineteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “King Yayāti Achieves Liberation.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to you, the supreme Lord Vāsudeva, residing in all living entities. I offer respects to the great Lord who is peaceful. “By what practice does one absorb the mind in Kṛṣṇa?” One does this by offering respects, by meditation and chanting. When Ambarīṣa was the emperor of the seven islands, it is understood that Yayāti was the ruler of Bhārata-varṣa. [Note: SB 9.18.46 describes Yayāti as the ruler of the seven islands. This must mean seven varṣas out of nine belonging to Bhārata-varṣa. Simultaneously Ambarīśa ruled the seven islands made by the seven oceans. ] Ambarīṣa is the eighth in the following line: Brahmā, Marīci, Kaśyapa, Vivasvān, Śrāddhadeva, Naghava, Nābhāga and Ambarīṣa. Yayāti was eighth in the following line: Brahmā, Atri, Candra, Budha, Purūrava, Āyu, Nahuṣa and Yayāti. Because of the influence of Ambarīṣa, Yayāti, who was absorbed in material enjoyment, developed great devotion. Because of Yayāti’s association, Devayānī also developed great devotion. When the dynasty from the sun and moon begin simultaneously and when the emperors of the sun dynasty rule the seven islands, the kings of the moon dynasty rule Bhārata-varṣa. When the members of the moon dynasty become emperors of the seven islands, then the members of the sun dynasty become the kings of Bhārata-varṣa. This is how the sovereignty of the dynasties of the sun and moon operate. Thus ends the commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter of the Ninth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty Puru’s Descendents: Śakuntalā
Related verses
📝 My note