A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
In His Kaumara-Lila, from birth to age five, Krishna performed many astonishing activities. As a baby He attacked fierce demons ( asuras ), proving His Supreme identity beyond any doubt. His astonishing activities continued as He displayed the entire universe within His mouth and mystically frustrated Mother Yasoda as she attempted to bind Him to a wooden grinding mortar. When Brahma mistook Krishna to be an ordinary cowherd boy, the Lord formulated an astonishing plan to correct his misconception. In this way, the astonishing pastimes of Krishna fascinated the inhabitants of Vrindavana to no end.
Previous Krishna Appearing in Our Life Next Attacking Asuras
Last updated 1 year ago
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
In His Kaumara-Lila, from birth to age five, Krishna performed many astonishing activities. As a baby He attacked fierce demons ( asuras ), proving His Supreme identity beyond any doubt. His astonishing activities continued as He displayed the entire universe within His mouth and mystically frustrated Mother Yasoda as she attempted to bind Him to a wooden grinding mortar. When Brahma mistook Krishna to be an ordinary cowherd boy, the Lord formulated an astonishing plan to correct his misconception. In this way, the astonishing pastimes of Krishna fascinated the inhabitants of Vrindavana to no end.
Previous Krishna Appearing in Our Life Next Attacking Asuras
Last updated 1 year ago
Astonishing Activities
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Astonishing Activities
Chapter 8, 9, 10, 11
Baby Antics: After Their discreet name-giving ceremony, Gargamuni, an expert astrologer, clearly established the supreme identity of the brothers. Despite this, Krishna and Balarama performed a variety of charming, childlike activities that delighted the Vrindavana residents, causing them to abandon any sense of awe and reverence. The cowherd ladies would lovingly complain to Mother Yasoda about Krishna’s nefarious antics of untying the calves, stealing freshly made butter, breaking pots and defiling homes.
Universal Form: When Krishna’s playmates complained that He had eaten dirt, Yasoda immediately examined His mouth and astonishingly saw the entirety of the cosmos there! Baffled, she momentarily questioned Krishna’s identity and her relationship with Him, but quickly returned to her natural state of maternal affection. [ 30 ]
Binding Krishna: When Yasoda attended to a pot of overflowing milk while feeding Krishna, the Lord became annoyed. He angrily broke a pot of butter, started eating it, distributed it to the monkeys and then ran away in fear of punishment. Seeing His mischief, His mother called Him, chased Him, caught Him, and decided to bind Him to a wooden grinding mortar. Despite tying multiple ropes together, it just wouldn’t fit around the Lord’s body! Seeing His mother’s intense endeavour, Krishna finally allowed Himself to be bound. Later, to actualise the benediction of Narada Muni, Krishna uprooted the twin yamala-arjuna trees in the courtyard and delivered Nalakuvera and Manigriva from their curse which had lasted for one hundred celestial years. They then prayed to be fully immersed, mind, body and words, in the service of Krishna.
Fruit Vendor: Krishna and Balarama would charm the cowherd ladies, stay out beyond their lunch-time and frolic all day in transcendental joy. When a vendor liberally gave Krishna many fruits without consideration of return, she found that her basket magically became filled with jewels; one who gives to Krishna is never a loser.
Being disturbed by a variety of demons, the cowherd leaders decided to leave Gokula and relocate to Vrindavana. They went towards the transcendental forest in a convoy, festively singing the glories of Krishna. Seeing Vrindavana, Govardhana and Yamuna, they became overjoyed. This is when Krishna and Balarama finished their childhood pastimes and began tending calves on the pasturing ground.
Previous Attacking Asuras Next Attacking More Asuras
Last updated 1 year ago
Attacking Asuras
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Attacking Asuras
Chapter 6, 7
Putana: Sent by Kamsa, the demoness arrived in Gokula disguised as a beautiful maiden. She nonchalantly walked into the bedroom of Krishna, placed Him on her lap, and offered her breast which was smeared with poison. Understanding her purpose, Krishna clasped her breast and sucked her entire life out, after which she collapsed on the ground and revealed her ghastly, demoniac form. As Krishna danced upon her body, the anxious inhabitants of Vrindavana lovingly picked Him up and performed various rituals of protection. Despite her inimical attitude, Putana was transferred to the spiritual world.
Sakatasura: When Krishna turned three months old, His mother celebrated a rite of passage while He lay under a cart in a cradle. When Krishna awoke from His slumber, He began to cry for milk and powerfully thrust His legs upward. That kick collapsed the entire cart, within which the demon Sakatasura was hiding, and everything fell crashing to the ground. The demon was immediately killed, while Krishna remained unharmed.
Trinavarta: On another occasion, while holding her baby, Yasoda could no longer bear Krishna’s weight. After putting Him down, a huge whirlwind appeared which blinded everyone. That dust storm was caused by Trinavarta, who utilised the opportunity to swiftly kidnap Krishna. While flying in the sky, Krishna again became too heavy to carry, and being unable to let go of Krishna, the demon came hurtling down and died.
Previous A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14) Next Astonishing Activities
Last updated 1 year ago
Attacking More Asuras
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Attacking More Asuras
Chapter 11, 12
Vatsasura: When a demon entered the herd disguised as a calf, Krishna twirled him around and killed him.
Bakasura: The crane demon attacked Krishna with his sharp beak and tried to swallow Him. He met his death when his body was bifurcated by the Lord.
Aghasura: This snake demon was the younger brother of Putana and Bakasura. When the cowherd boys wandered into the gigantic python’s mouth, Krishna followed them and suffocated Aghasura. He then brought all the gopas and calves back to life. Krishna was five years old when this incident took place but the residents of Vrindavana only learned of it a year later – Maharaja Pariksit enquired why.
Previous Astonishing Activities Next Brahma’s Illusion
Last updated 1 year ago
Brahma’s Illusion
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Brahma’s Illusion
Chapter 13, 14
After the killing of Aghasura, Krishna and the gopas went for a picnic at a picturesque spot. As the calves wandered off, Krishna went to retrieve them, and during that time Brahma kidnapped both the cowherd boys and calves, and placed them in mystic slumber. Having observed the childlike activities of Krishna, Brahma wanted to test how powerful the Lord actually was. In divine response, Krishna expanded Himself into identical cowherd boys and calves just to please His devotees who wanted Him as Their child. Unaware why, the cows and parents suddenly felt incredible attraction for their calves and cowherd boys, more so than ever before.
When Balarama sensed something extraordinary, He questioned Krishna, who explained the entire episode. After a full year, Brahma returned and saw Krishna happily playing with His friends and calves, just as before. He was astonished by Krishna’s potency and could perceive that every calf and boy had a bluish complexion, four arms, and all the qualities of Vishnu. He realised his grave mistake and composed beautiful prayers concluding that bhakti was the only way to realise Krishna. After Brahma was corrected, Krishna arranged for the original cowherd boys and calves to be reunited, and due to His illusory energy, they were oblivious to all that had transpired. While returning to Vrindavana that day, Krishna showed them the dead body of Aghasura.
Previous Attacking More Asuras Next Demons and Anarthas
Last updated 1 year ago
Demons and Anarthas
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Demons and Anarthas
“Material life means that one forgets Krishna and that one increases in one’s desires for sense gratification. But if one receives the advantage of instructions from saintly persons and forgets the importance of material desires, one is automatically purified. Ceto-darpana-marjanam bhava- maha-davagni-nirvapanam [ CC Antya 20.12 ] (Siksastakam 1) . Unless the core of a materialistic person’s heart is purified, he cannot get rid of the pangs of bhava-maha- davagni , the blazing fire of material existence.” (SB 10.10.17)
In the nine stages of spiritual life documented by Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura in Madhurya Kadambini, anartha-nivrtti , or the cleaning of unwanted things from the heart, is perhaps the longest and most arduous. After lifetimes of material conditioning, purifying ourselves of material contamination is not an easy task. Imagine trying to wash a pair of trousers that have been worn for decades at a stretch! Without undergoing that cleansing process, however, one can never really develop a substantial connection with Krishna. We can intimately approach the purest person only when we ourselves become pure.
The killing of demons in Vrindavana has a deep significance in this regard. The stories of Srimad-Bhagavatam, although real events, can also have metaphorical dimensions which don’t replace the literal, but suitably complement. Bhaktivinoda Thakura offers a novel explanation of the demons in Vrindavana which can assist the practitioner devotee ( sadhaka ) in their endeavours to purify the heart. In his Chaitanya-Siksamrita he writes, “The devotee who worships the holy name should first petition the Lord for the strength to cast out all these unfavourable tendencies and should pray thus before Lord Hari on a daily basis. By doing this regularly, the devotee’s heart will eventually become purified. Sri Krishna has killed a number of demons, which may arise in the kingdom of the heart. In order to destroy these problems, a devotee must cry very humbly before the Lord and admit defeat. Then the Lord will nullify all contaminations.”
Demons never appear in the spiritual world – they only wreak havoc in this realm. Each demon killed by Krishna in Canto Ten of Srimad-Bhagavatam represents an impurity or obstacle ( anartha ) preventing a devotee from attaining pure love for Krishna. These material impurities and demoniac qualities must be completely cast away from the core of one’s heart. Only cent percent pure devotees of Krishna can live eternally in Vrindavana blissfully serving the Divine Couple. [ 31 ]
Previous Brahma’s Illusion Next The Process of Anartha-Nivrtti
Last updated 1 year ago
The Process of Anartha-Nivrtti
Canto 10 (Part 1)
A – Attacking Asuras and Astonishing Activities (6-14)
Demons and Anarthas
The Process of Anartha-Nivrtti
Map your Territory
Our valuable hours are often consumed by pressing issues and daily demands. Though some things surely require immediate attention, we do have a chronic tendency to unnecessarily promote tasks in our ‘to-do list’ that may well be urgent but not really very important. Thus, we end up neglecting that which doesn’t frantically tug on our consciousness, but is key to the bright future ahead – time spent reflecting, questioning and planning. We need to free up tangible time and mental space to explore our inside story and the condition of our hearts.
As we journey journey on the path of devotion, we should be aware of that which block our progress. Without making the effort to grow, to learn, to explore and to challenge our current ways of functioning, how can we truly realise our potential? The process of understanding anarthas begins with our own reflection and introspection. By observing ourselves, writing a diary and comparing our character with our cherished ideals, we can quickly ascertain where we need to shape up. This process is further supported by trustworthy friends who know us; their feedback and advice can help reveal and resolve our issues. We can also turn to Krishna and pray for His inspiration to highlight what character refinements need our attention.
Apply the Process
The various anarthas in the heart stem from a false identity and vision of life. The world roots us in the selfish conception of “I, me and mine” and the result is that we develop lust, anger, greed, envy, pride and illusion. Acts of bhakti help us to realign our vision and realise our true identity as servants. By associating with sincere devotees who are pursuing (or have achieved) self-realisation, we draw strength and inspiration. By meditating on and appreciating the good qualities of other devotees, one begins to develop those very same qualities.
When we chant Krishna’s names, we remind ourselves of the cherished goal of life – “Please Lord, engage me in your service.” The chanting clears layers of illusion from the mirror of the heart and allows us to again perceive the real self.
Along with these spiritual practices, we also engage in practical service. Making a sacrifice of time and energy to actively embrace the identity of a servant and do something tangible for Krishna, also helps awaken us to that reality. A servant serves – it’s as simple as that.
Maintain the Hope
The road to purity is long and winding. There are good days and bad days; times when we feel a breakthrough and times when we feel like breaking down. Despite our fallen condition, the unbreakable hope is that Krishna is unlimitedly kind and compassionate, and His mercy is far more powerful than any material impediment. Thus, in any condition of struggle, the devotee happily continues, knowing that anything is possible with Krishna’s help.
“Having awakened faith in the narrations of My glories, being disgusted with all material activities, knowing that all sense gratification leads to misery, but still being unable to renounce all sense enjoyment, My devotee should remain happy and worship Me with great faith and conviction. Even though he is sometimes engaged in sense enjoyment, My devotee knows that all sense gratification leads to a miserable result, and he sincerely repents such activities.” ( SB 11.20.27-28 )
Previous Demons and Anarthas Next B – Boyhood (15-28)
Last updated 1 year ago
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca—Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī saidkvacit—one dayvana - āśāya—just to enjoy a picnic in the forestmanaḥ—minddadhat—gave attentionvrajāt—and went out of Vrajabhūmiprātaḥ—early in the morningsamutthāya—waking upvayasya - vatsa - pān—the cowherd boys and the calvesprabodhayan—to get everyone to rise, waking up and informing themśṛṅga - raveṇa—by sounding the bugle made of horncāruṇā—very beautifulvinirgataḥ—came out of Vrajabhūmivatsa - puraḥsaraḥ—keeping the respective groups of calves in fronthariḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godhead .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
kvacid vanāśāya mano dadhad vrajāt
kvacit
one day
vana - āśāya
just to enjoy a picnic in the forest
manaḥ
mind
dadhat
gave attention
vrajāt
and went out of Vrajabhūmi
prātaḥ samutthāya vayasya-vatsapān
prātaḥ
early in the morning
samutthāya
waking up
vayasya - vatsa - pān
the cowherd boys and the calves
prabodhayañ chṛṅga-raveṇa cāruṇā
prabodhayan
to get everyone to rise, waking up and informing them
śṛṅga - raveṇa
by sounding the bugle made of horn
cāruṇā
very beautiful
vinirgato vatsa-puraḥsaro hariḥ
vinirgataḥ
came out of Vrajabhūmi
vatsa - puraḥsaraḥ
keeping the respective groups of calves in front
hariḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead .
Important Words
vana-āśāya—intending to enjoy a picnic in the forest
Compound: vana (forest) + āśā (desire, intention). Kṛṣṇa's desire to picnic is what stirs the entire līlā into motion — His personal wish is the prime mover, not karmic necessity. Gauḍīyas read this as Bhagavān's svecchā: He acts out of His own pleasure (līlā), not need.
śṛṅga-raveṇa—by the sound of the horn-bugle
Compound: śṛṅga (horn) + rava (sound). The same Kṛṣṇa whose flute will later steal the gopīs' minds here uses a rougher cowherd's horn to gather His sakhās — the same Person, two rasas. Sakhya-rasa has its own instrument.
vatsa-puraḥsaraḥ—keeping the calves in front
Compound: vatsa (calf) + puraḥ-sara (going in front). Kṛṣṇa walks behind His calves, letting them set the pace. The Lord of all beings places the smallest creatures ahead of Himself — the cowherd protocol of Vraja.
hariḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godhead
He who removes (hṛ-) all inauspiciousness. Significantly used here for the boy who is about to be 'swallowed' — Śuka signals from the first verse that no demon can actually consume Hari.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: O King, one day Kṛṣṇa decided to take His breakfast as a picnic in the forest. Having risen early in the morning, He blew His bugle made of horn and woke all the cowherd boys and calves with its beautiful sound. Then Kṛṣṇa and the boys, keeping their respective groups of calves before them, proceeded from Vrajabhūmi to the forest.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: O King, one day Kṛṣṇa decided to take His breakfast as a picnic in the forest. Having risen early in the morning, He blew His bugle made of horn and woke all the cowherd boys and calves with its beautiful sound. Then Kṛṣṇa and the boys, keeping their respective groups of calves before them, proceeded from Vrajabhūmi to the forest.
Commentary
The twelfth chapter describes Krsna playing with his friends and Aghasura. When the friends entered the mouth of Aghasura, Krsna followed them, and, enlarging his body, killed the demon.
One day (kvacit) Krsna went out desiring to take a meal in the forest (vanasaya). Only Krsna’s name is mentioned, indicating that Rohini by force kept Balarama at home in order to bathe him and perform auspicious rites on his birthday
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
May the astonishing Lord who shines because of astonishing form, qualities and activities be merciful to me! In three chapters Śukadeva describes further pastimes of the kaumāra age. First he describes the killing of Aghāsura. I do not see why some people do not accept chapters 12-14 and the statements concerning Pūtanā (SB 10.6.35-40, SB 10.6.44), where it is stated that Pūtanā was liberated, since the stories are available in all places and there are explanations of them in ancient and modern commentaries such Vāsanābhāṣya, Sambandhokti, Vidvat-kāmadhenu, Śuka-manoharā, and Paramahaṁsa-priyā. If the chapters are not authoritative, based on proofs in one’s own sampradāya, the opposite conclusion can also be reached by proofs from other sampradāyas which accept it. Some will argue that names such as Aghabhit , like Mura-bhit, are not seen in the Bhāgavatam (and therefore the story of Aghāsura is interpolated). This is not an acceptable argument, for it is said:
yan na vrajanty agha-bhido racanānuvādāc
chṛṇvanti ye ’nya-viṣayāḥ kukathā mati-ghnīḥ
Those who hear topics other than the glorification of Aghabhit, unworthy topics which destroy intelligence, cannot enter Vaikuṇṭha. SB 3.15.23
Aghabhidaḥ, meaning “destroyer of sin” has been used in the Bhāgavatam. Nor can one say that the pastime does not occurring in lists of the pastimes in the Bhāgavatam since Śrīdhara Svāmī in various places refers to this pastime. To say there are 332 chapters of Bhāgavatam, with omission of three chapters in the middle, is not acceptable to him. Nor should anything be omitted anywhere else.
Thus when Śrīdhara Svāmī says dvātrimśat triśatāṁ ca yasya vilasat śākhā, he does not mention that the three chapters are not included or that three are omitted. Because he has commented on all the chapters and all the verses, in the phrase dvātrimśat triśatām, the meaning is actually thirty-two plus three and three hundred. Trisatam is a dvandva compound in which satam (hundreds) actually means three hundred by the rule kapiṣjala-ālabhana nyāya (accepting partridges), where the plural indicates three unless otherwise stated. If it is not accepted as a dvanda-samāsa the word should become triśatī if it means three hundred, and not triśatam.
Nor should the chapters be rejected because they describe that demons attain liberation since there are many examples where Kṛṣṇa gives liberation to those he kills.
āsurīṁ yonim āpannā mūḍhā janmani janmani |
mām aprāpyaiva kaunteya tato yānty adhamāṁ gatim ||
Taking birth as demons birth after birth, these fools, not contacting me, go to the lowest status of life, O son of Kuntī. BG 16.20
The verse says those who do not attain Kṛṣṇa enter into hell (whereas those who do contact him get liberated.) Therefore Bhāgavatam says:
ye ca pralamba-khara-dardura-keśy-ariṣṭa-
mallebha-kaṁsa-yavanāḥ kapi-pauṇḍrakādyāḥ |
anye ca śālva-kuja-balvala-dantavakra-
saptokṣa-śambara-vidūratha-rukmi-mukhyāḥ ||
ye vā mṛdhe samiti-śālina ātta-cāpāḥ
kāmboja-matsya-kuru-sṛṣjaya-kaikayādyāḥ |
yāsyanty adarśanam alaṁ bala-pārtha-bhīma-
vyājāhvayena hariṇā nilayaṁ tadīyam ||
The demons headed by Pralambha, Dhenuka, Baka, Keśī, Ariṣṭa, the wrestlers, Kuvalayāpīḍa, Kaṁṣa, Kālayavana, Dvivida, Pauṇḍraka, Śālva, Narakāsura, Balvala, Dantavakra, the seven bulls, Śambara, Vidūratha and Rukmi, as well as those with bow in hand glorious in fighting on the battlefield, such as the Kāmbojas, Matsyas, Kurus, Sṛṣjayas, and Kaikayas will attain sāyujya or Vaikuṇṭha by the Lord or through his instruments Balarāma, Arjuna, Bhīma and others. SB 2.7.34-35
One cannot say “These pastimes did not take place since they are not mentioned in other Purāṇas.” The pastimes are clearly mentioned Padma Purāṇa, Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa and others. Furthermore places of these pastimes are well known in Vṛndāvana. It is also not a contradiction if the demons attain a destination similar to that of the devotees, since pure devotees do not value the liberation that the demons achieve at all. There are hundreds of statements like the following:
nātyantikaṁ vigaṇayanty api te prasādaṁ
kimv anyad arpita-bhayaṁ bhruva unnayais te
Persons who have realized you do not regard attainment of impersonal liberation as your mercy, what to speak of attaining a material position like Indra which is subject to fear caused by the Lord raising his eyebrow. SB 3.15.48
Nor did Pūtanā become a mother equal to Yaśodā. This idea is rejected by those who understand the glorification of Yaśodā. Sad-veṣād iva pūtanāpi sa-kulā tvām eva devāpitā: you have already arranged to give yourself to Pūtanā and her family members in exchange for her disguising herself as a devotee. (SB 10.14.35) Pūtanā is glorified only for assuming the dress of a mother to attain the Lord. This produces greater glorification of Yaśodā. She is glorified for attaining the position of a mother because she dressed like a mother. The problem is not resolved by saying that there were two souls in Pūtanā. According to the saying tat-saṁsargī ca paṣcamah she had fault. Thus there is no contradiction. Rather it produces the highest glorification of the devotees and their bhakti. This can be realized by the special mercy of the Lord. Thus Śukadeva says the topics are confidential. (SB 10.13.3)
Enough of this. Let us return to the topic. Kṛṣṇa had a strong desire to picnic in the forest. The previous day he informed his friends that they would have breakfast prepared at home and they would carry the meal to the forest. This was the first time he desired to do this. Previously it was mentioned that he took breakfast and went to the forest. In this verse it says “One day he desired to eat in the forest.” After taking off his night clothing, washing his face and dressing in attractive clothing, he quickly rose to his feet, left the house and woke up the other boys. With a desire to have fun with the boys, he slowly left Vraja. These herders of calves were his friends. He woke them up with joy by the pleasing (cārunā) sound of his horn. The pleasing nature of the horn was its very svarūpa. He put the calves in front. He is called Hari because he was attractive to all the boys. He left Vraja in a special condition (vi—nirgataḥ)—without Balarāma. Though Balarāma desired to go on hearing the sound of the horn, and had heard of the plans from Kṛṣṇa, his mother made him perform ceremonies for safety at home on the instructions of astrologers. This was the main reason for him not being present there. The influence of the līlā-śakti to produce his absence in the pastimes was secondary, since Kṛṣṇa’s main reason for going was the picnic whereas the killing Aghāsura and Brahmā’s bewilderment was incidental. Each word, sentence, verse and topic in this pastime from beginning to end is filled with more wonder than anything previous. The pastime can be understood only by those with devotion. For fear of lengthening the discussion, nothing more will be said.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Three chapters now describe the kaumāra pastimes in order. The killing of Aghāsura is first described.
Some followers of Madhvācārya, who take liberation as the supreme goal, with conservative mentalities, cannot tolerate the liberation of a demon by sucking a gopī’s breast and criticize statements like the description starting in SB 10.6.35 and SB 10.6.44 which say that Putanā attained liberation. This is not proper since the stories are available in many scriptures and these are respected by ancient and modern commentaries like Śrīdhara Svāmī. The place where Aghāsura was killed, the grazing ground and the place where Brahmā offered praises are well known in Vṛndāvana. The story is also in Padma Purāṇa. It is not contrary to the conclusions of the great devotees, since liberation is not desirable for the devotees. That is clear everywhere in Bhāgavatam.
Gopīs who gave Kṛṣṇa their breast milk are similar to Yāśodā. They are dearest to the Lord, young and number in the thousands. That will become clear later. There is no contradiction. In these three chapters the extraordinary greatness of bhakti, devotees and the Lord and realization by the special mercy of the Lord is presented. This is confidential and is presented in the explanations of the devotees. Why discuss further?
At some time, when Kṛṣṇa had reached five years of age, in the autumn on some day, he became determined (mano dadhat) to go to the forest. Though the boys had eaten breakfast at home, they took all ingredients of food to the forest. Kṛṣṇa, full of eternity, knowledge and bliss, has a form with limbs. Though there is no difference between his mind and other functions of his antaḥkaraṇa and Kṛṣṇa himself, distinction is made for certain purposes. This will be explained later.
After giving up his night dress, washing his mouth, putting on clean cloth and ornaments after getting up, he left the bedroom and woke up his friends. Wanting to go with them, he left Vraja quietly. His horn had a beautiful sound, appropriate to wake up the boys with joy. Or he told them the previous day that the horn would be the signal to go for a picnic in the forest. Or cārunā indicates the attractive nature of the sound. It was always beautiful.
He placed the calves in front. He attracted their hearts (hariḥ). He went alone, without Balarāma on that day. The reason will be explained later. What was astonishing that day was his determination to go to the forest for a picnic. Furthermore, he rose from bed without being called by his mother. And he personally woke up all the calves using the beautiful sound of his horn. And he went without his brother. And he put the calves in front. The sequence of words and phrases indicate progressively more astonishing facts. This is understood by the devotees. This will not be expanded for fear of lengthening the commentary.
His Holiness Radha Raman Swami· 2021-09-26· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a captain rousing his crew before sunrise — but the captain is Kṛṣṇa, the crew is His cowherd friends, the bugle is a horn from the forest, and the day's voyage is breakfast under the trees. Every dawn in Vraja is launched by Kṛṣṇa Himself: He does not wait to be woken, He wakes the world.
tena—Himeva—indeedsākam—accompanied bypṛthukāḥ—the boyssahasraśaḥ—by the thousandssnigdhāḥ—very attractivesu—beautifulśik—lunch bagsvetra—sticks for controlling the calvesviṣāṇa—horn buglesveṇavaḥ—flutessvān svān—their own respectivesahasra - upari - saṅkhyayā anvitān—numbering over a thousandvatsān—the calvespuraḥ - kṛtya—keeping in frontviniryayuḥ—they came outmudā—with great pleasure .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tenaiva sākaṁ pṛthukāḥ sahasraśaḥ
tena
Him
eva
indeed
sākam
accompanied by
pṛthukāḥ
the boys
sahasraśaḥ
by the thousands
snigdhāḥ suśig-vetra-viṣāṇa-veṇavaḥ
snigdhāḥ
very attractive
su
beautiful
śik
lunch bags
vetra
sticks for controlling the calves
viṣāṇa
horn bugles
veṇavaḥ
flutes
svān svān sahasropari-saṅkhyayānvitān
svān svān
their own respective
sahasra - upari - saṅkhyayā anvitān
numbering over a thousand
vatsān puraskṛtya viniryayur mudā
vatsān
the calves
puraḥ - kṛtya
keeping in front
viniryayuḥ
they came out
mudā
with great pleasure .
Important Words
snigdhāḥ—very attractive, affectionate
From snih (to be sticky, to love). The boys are 'sticky' with love for Kṛṣṇa — sakhya-rasa is described in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu as the rasa in which the sthāyī-bhāva makes the heart adhere to the friend.
śik—lunch bags hanging from strings
The śikya is the small net-bag the cowherd boys carry. These bags become the running joke of verse 5 (they steal each other's) and the entire premise of Brahmā's later test — when the calves vanish, the bags are still in hand.
vetra—stick for controlling the calves
The cowherd's staff. Kṛṣṇa Himself carries one — Gauḍīyas meditate on tribhaṅga-mūrti with vetra and veṇu in hand. Sakhya-rasa retains tool and uniform; it does not dissolve into formless love.
veṇavaḥ—flutes
Plural — every boy has a flute, but only one flute is Kṛṣṇa's. The veṇu motif runs through Canto 10: in 10.21 the gopīs declare His flute supremely fortunate. Here the instrument is still casual, a child's toy among many.
viṣāṇa—horns (as bugles)
Buffalo or cow horn used as a signaling instrument. Cowherd life has its own kit — staff, flute, horn, lunch-bag. The Gauḍīya tradition cherishes these small concrete details because Vraja is not abstract; it is a particular place with particular objects.
At that time, hundreds and thousands of cowherd boys came out of their respective homes in Vrajabhūmi and joined Kṛṣṇa, keeping before them their hundreds and thousands of groups of calves. The boys were very beautiful, and they were equipped with lunch bags, bugles, flutes, and sticks for controlling the calves.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
At that time, hundreds and thousands of cowherd boys came out of their respective homes in Vrajabhūmi and joined Kṛṣṇa, keeping before them their hundreds and thousands of groups of calves. The boys were very beautiful, and they were equipped with lunch bags, bugles, flutes, and sticks for controlling the calves.
Commentary
Prthuka refers to the cowherd boys. They were holding slings (sik), sticks, horns and flutes. Sahasra pari sankhya means ten thousand. Krsna had asankhya calves. Asankhya is one followed by seventeen zeros. One should not say however that that many cows cannot fit in the sixteen krosa area of Vrndavana, because by the inconceivable energy of the Lord, the dhama is unlimited. In one portion of the dhama the billions of universes measuring 50 koti yojanas fits. Krsna showed this to Brahma in a later chapter. It is said in the Brhad Bhagavatamrta that because the Lord, associates, and the dhama have inconceivable power, there is no obstacles.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
All the boys came out with great speed and simultaneously in order to associate with him since they had great affection for him. They were in the thousands.
ekaṁ daśa śataṁ caiva sahasraṁ ayutaṁ tathā
lakṣaṁ ca niyutaṁ caiva koṭir nyarbudam eva ca
A thousand is ten hundreds and ayutam is a ten thousand. Lakṣa is a hundred thousand. Niyutam is a million. Koṭi is ten million. Nyarbuda is a hundred million.
Thus they were in the ten thousands. The boys and calves together could not be counted. If the number of calves that they herded in the forest was beyond calculation, how many more calves must have been left back in Vraja--the small calves taking milk from their mothers, as well as the mothers of the calves that went to the forest, other cows, the elder male and female calves, the bulls, whose numbers kept increasing daily by the power of Gopāla, and the buffalo as well. Thus the animals, cowherd and cowherd women were unlimited in number. Rāsa-dhyānaṁ pramadā-śata-koṭibhir ākulitaḥ: a billion gopīs gathered at the place of the rāsa dance. Such places exist by the inconceivable power of the Lord. The boys were joyful (mudā) because Kṛṣṇa had personally awakened them. They departed in a special manner (vi—niryayuḥ).
Imagine a village festival where every family sends out its children at the same hour, each with a satchel of lunch and a flute — and at the center of the procession, the village's beloved boy whose laugh decides the mood. Vrajabhūmi empties into the forest each morning because Kṛṣṇa is going, and no one wants to be left behind.
kṛṣṇa—of Lord Kṛṣṇavatsaiḥ—along with the calvesasaṅkhyātaiḥ—unlimitedyūthī - kṛtya—assembled themsva - vatsakān—personal calvescārayantaḥ—executingarbha - līlābhiḥ—by boyhood pastimesvijahruḥ—enjoyedtatra tatra—here and thereha—indeed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛṣṇa-vatsair asaṅkhyātair
kṛṣṇa
of Lord Kṛṣṇa
vatsaiḥ
along with the calves
asaṅkhyātaiḥ
unlimited
yūthī-kṛtya sva-vatsakān
yūthī - kṛtya
assembled them
sva - vatsakān
personal calves
cārayanto ’rbha-līlābhir
cārayantaḥ
executing
arbha - līlābhiḥ
by boyhood pastimes
vijahrus tatra tatra ha
vijahruḥ
enjoyed
tatra tatra
here and there
ha
indeed .
Important Words
asaṅkhyātaiḥ—with innumerable
a- (not) + saṅkhyāta (counted). The calves are 'beyond counting' — the same word-field reappears in chapter 13 when Brahmā steals them and Kṛṣṇa instantly produces innumerable replacements. Vraja's abundance is not a finite resource.
arbha-līlābhiḥ—with childlike sportive activities
Compound: arbha (child) + līlā (sportive play). Kṛṣṇa's pastimes at this age are explicitly arbha — boyish, not adult. Gauḍīyas distinguish kaumāra-līlā (up to ~5), paugaṇḍa-līlā, and kaiśora-līlā; rasas differ by age.
yūthī-kṛtya—forming into groups
From yūtha (herd). The cowherd boys organize the calves into clusters — administration as play. Sakhya-rasa is competent, not dreamy; the boys actually herd.
sva-vatsakān—their own calves
Each boy has his own group. Kṛṣṇa's friendship does not erase the boys' individual responsibilities — acintya-bhedābheda even here: united in Kṛṣṇa, distinct in role.
Along with the cowherd boys and their own groups of calves, Kṛṣṇa came out with an unlimited number of calves assembled. Then all the boys began to sport in the forest in a greatly playful spirit.
Purport
In this verse the words kṛṣṇa-vatsair asaṅkhyātaiḥ are significant. The word asaṅkhyāta means “unlimited.” Kṛṣṇa’s calves were unlimited. We may speak of hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, billions, trillions, tens of trillions, and so on, but when we go further to speak of numbers impossible for us to count, we are speaking of unlimited numbers. Such unlimited numbers are indicated here by the word asaṅkhyātaiḥ. Kṛṣṇa is unlimited, His potency is unlimited, His cows and calves are unlimited, and His space is unlimited. Therefore He is described in Bhagavad-gītā as Parabrahman. The word brahman means “unlimited,” and Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Unlimited, Parabrahman. Therefore, we should not consider the statements of this verse to be mythological. They are factual, but inconceivable. Kṛṣṇa can accommodate an unlimited number of calves and an unlimited measurement of space. This is neither mythological nor false, but if we study Kṛṣṇa’s potency with our limited knowledge, that potency will never be possible to understand. Ataḥ śrī-kṛṣṇa-nāmādi na bhaved grāhyam indriyaiḥ ( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.2.109). Our senses cannot perceive how He could keep an unlimited number of calves and cows and have unlimited space in which to do so. But this is answered in the Bṛhad-bhāgavatāmṛta: evaṁ prabhoḥ priyānāṁ ca dhāmnaś ca samayasya ca avicintya-prabhāvatvād atra kiñcin na durghaṭam Śrī Sanātana Gosvāmī, in the Bṛhad-bhāgavatāmṛta, states that since everything about Kṛṣṇa is unlimited, nothing is impossible for Him. It is in this sense that we have to understand this verse.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Along with the cowherd boys and their own groups of calves, Kṛṣṇa came out with an unlimited number of calves assembled. Then all the boys began to sport in the forest in a greatly playful spirit.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The number of Kṛṣṇa’s calves was the number asaṇkhya. Kṣīra-svāmī says:
ekaṁ daśa śata śata sahasrāṇy ayutaṁ prayutākhya lakṣam atha niyutam
arbuda koṭir nyarbuda padme kharvaṁ nikhavam iti daśabhiḥ
gaṇanām mahābja- śaṅkha- samudra -madhyāntaṁ parārdhaṁ ca
svahataṁ parārdham amitam tam svahataṁ bhūryato ‘saṇkhyam
A prayuta is a hundred thousand and an arbuda is ten million. Ten multiplied by 18 times becomes one parārdha. Svahatam means multiplied by itself.
Śata=100
Sahasra=1000
Ayuta=10,000
Lakṣa or prayuta=100,000
Niyuta=1,000,000
Koṭi or arbuda=10,000,000
Nyarbuda=100,000,000
Padma=1,000,000,000
Khava=10,000,000,000
Nikharva=100,000,000,000
Mahābja-1,000,000,000,000
Śaṅkhu=10,000,000,000,000
Ssamudra=100,000,000,000,000
Antya= 1,000,000,000,000,000
Madhya=10,000,000,000,000,000
Parārdha=100,000,000,000,000,000
One parārdha x one x one parādha x one parārdha= one asaṅkhya.
They each had their individual calves (svān). Another version has sva-vatsakān. They went to the grazing fields (tatra tara). The word ha expresses joy.
Related values & verses
Related values
Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)
Think of a sandy shore at the moment a thousand small crabs scatter — except here the scattering is not flight but play, and at the center stands the boy whose presence makes the play sweet. Without Kṛṣṇa it would be a herd of calves; with Kṛṣṇa it is līlā.
phala—fruits from the forestprabāla—green leavesstavaka—bunchessumanaḥ—beautiful flowerspiccha—peacock feathersdhātubhiḥ—very soft and colorful mineralskāca—a kind of gemguñjā—small conchshellsmaṇi—pearlssvarṇa—goldbhūṣitāḥ—although decoratedapi abhūṣayan—in spite of being decorated by their mothers, the boys decorated themselves still more with the above-mentioned articles .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
phala-prabāla-stavaka-
phala
fruits from the forest
prabāla
green leaves
stavaka
bunches
sumanaḥ-piccha-dhātubhiḥ
sumanaḥ
beautiful flowers
piccha
peacock feathers
dhātubhiḥ
very soft and colorful minerals
kāca-guñjā-maṇi-svarṇa-
kāca
a kind of gem
guñjā
small conchshells
maṇi
pearls
svarṇa
gold
bhūṣitā apy abhūṣayan
bhūṣitāḥ
although decorated
api abhūṣayan
in spite of being decorated by their mothers, the boys decorated themselves still more with the above-mentioned articles .
Important Words
guñjā—small red-and-black berries used as ornaments
Guñjā berries are an iconic Vraja ornament — Kṛṣṇa Himself wears a guñjā-mālā in many Gauḍīya dhyāna verses (Rūpa Gosvāmī, Stava-mālā). Forest decoration is more dear to Kṛṣṇa than palace gold.
piccha—peacock feathers
The piccha-mauli, peacock-feather crown, is Kṛṣṇa's signature ornament — Gauḍīya iconography fixes this in every mūrti. Here His friends share the look; Vraja-sakhas dress like their Lord.
dhātubhiḥ—with mineral colors from the forest
Coloured earth pigments — gairika, etc. — used as tilaka and body-paint. The forest itself supplies the paint; the dhātu is what Vraja's hills offer freely to its children.
bhūṣitāḥ—decorated
From bhūṣ- (to adorn). Used here in passive — they were already adorned by their mothers. Vātsalya labors at the start of every day; the boys then add a sakhya-layer on top.
Although all these boys were already decorated by their mothers with ornaments of kāca, guñjā, pearls and gold, when they went into the forest they further decorated themselves with fruits, green leaves, bunches of flowers, peacock feathers and soft minerals.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Although all these boys were already decorated by their mothers with ornaments of kāca, guṣjā, pearls and gold, when they went into the forest they further decorated themselves with fruits, green leaves, bunches of flowers, peacock feathers and soft minerals.
Commentary
Though the boys were ornamented by their mothers with crystal and gunja seed beads, when they went to the forest they ornamented themselves with forest fruits and flowers.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Seven verses describe the playing of the young boys. Stavaka means flower clusters and sumanaḥ means flowers. Ornaments made of crystal were attractive to the boys because they could not be distinguished from valuable gems. The boys took guṣja berries growing in Vṛndāvana out of curiosity and their mothers strung them into necklaces. Sometimes mukta (pearl) is seen instead of guṣja.
Picture children at a wedding wearing the jewelry their mothers fastened on them at dawn — and then, on the road, picking up wildflowers and pinning them on top, until the wildflowers nearly outshine the gold. Vraja's love decorates twice: once at home with kāca and gold, again in the forest with leaves and minerals.
muṣṇantaḥ—stealinganyonya—from one anotherśikya - ādīn—lunch bags and other belongingsjñātān—having been understood by the proprietor of the bagārāt ca—to a distant placecikṣipuḥ—threw awaytatratyāḥ ca—those who were in that place alsopunaḥ dūrāt—then again threw farther awayhasantaḥ ca punaḥ daduḥ—when they saw the proprietor, they threw it farther away and enjoyed laughing, and when the owner sometimes cried, his bag was given to him again .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
muṣṇanto ’nyonya-śikyādīn
muṣṇantaḥ
stealing
jñātān ārāc ca cikṣipuḥ
anyonya
from one another
śikya - ādīn
lunch bags and other belongings
jñātān
having been understood by the proprietor of the bag
tatratyāś ca punar dūrād
ārāt ca
to a distant place
cikṣipuḥ
threw away
dhasantaś ca punar daduḥ
tatratyāḥ ca
those who were in that place also
punaḥ dūrāt
then again threw farther away
hasantaḥ ca punaḥ daduḥ
when they saw the proprietor, they threw it farther away and enjoyed laughing, and when the owner sometimes cried, his bag was given to him again .
Important Words
muṣṇantaḥ—stealing
From muṣ- (to steal). The same root will return in 10.13 (Brahmā stealing the calves) and in the butter-thief līlā. Theft in Vraja is always playful — never property crime, always love-game. Gauḍīyas call Kṛṣṇa 'Cora' as a name of endearment.
śikya-ādīn—lunch-bags and so on
Compound: śikya (lunch bag) + ādi (etcetera). The 'etcetera' is significant — they steal whatever is at hand. Sakhya-rasa is improvisational.
hasantaḥ—laughing
From has- (to laugh). Laughter is the keynote of sakhya-rasa; Rūpa Gosvāmī classifies hāsya (humor) as one of the seven secondary rasas, and in Vraja it is constant. The owner's tears and the friends' laughter are both ingredients of the same rasa.
daduḥ—they gave back
Aorist of dā- (to give). The game has a finite arc — tease, cry, return. Vraja's pranks always end in restoration; nothing is lost, even the lunch-bag.
All the cowherd boys used to steal one another’s lunch bags. When a boy came to understand that his bag had been taken away, the other boys would throw it farther away, to a more distant place, and those standing there would throw it still farther. When the proprietor of the bag became disappointed, the other boys would laugh, the proprietor would cry, and then the bag would be returned.
Purport
This kind of playing and stealing among boys still exists even in the material world because this kind of sporting pleasure is present in the spiritual world, from which this idea of enjoyment emanates. Janmādy asya yataḥ ( Vedānta-sūtra 1.1.2). This same enjoyment is displayed by Kṛṣṇa and His associates in the spiritual world, but there the enjoyment is eternal, whereas here, on the material platform, it is temporary; there the enjoyment is brahman, whereas here the enjoyment is jaḍa. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is meant to train one how to transfer oneself from the jaḍa to the Brahman, because human life is meant for this purpose. Athāto brahma jijñāsā ( Vedānta-sūtra 1.1.1). Kṛṣṇa comes down to teach us how we can enjoy with Him on the spiritual platform, in the spiritual world. Not only does He come, but He personally displays His pastimes in Vṛndāvana and attracts people to spiritual enjoyment.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
All the cowherd boys used to steal one another's lunch bags. When a boy came to understand that his bag had been taken away, the other boys would throw it farther away, to a more distant place, and those standing there would throw it still farther. When the proprietor of the bag became disappointed, the other boys would laugh, the proprietor would cry, and then the bag would be returned.
Commentary
They began to steal (musnantah) each others articles. Stealing from the sling the food vessel with sealed tops, some boys would take it to a place difficult to access, such as a base of a tree surrounded by thorn bushes and red ants. When the person discovered his lunch was stolen and tried to get it, someone would throw it further away, and when he ran for it someone would throw it further. Then the boy would cry, and the other boys, laughing, would return his lunch.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
They would steal the ropes, sticks or other items, but not the contents of their packets, which held their food, since it would be improper to laugh if a boy’s food was destroyed. They then threw the items, which were recognized by the owners. When the victims cried or became bewildered they would laugh.
Related values & verses
Related values
Dana (Charity / Generosity)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)
Imagine a circle of children playing keep-away with one boy's hat — the hat sails over heads, the owner runs and cries, everyone laughs, and finally the hat comes back. This is not malice; it is the texture of friendship. In Vraja, even theft is rasa.
yadi—ifdūram—to a distant placegataḥ—wentkṛṣṇaḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godheadvana - śobha—the beauty of the forestīkṣaṇāya—for visiting and enjoyingtam—unto Kṛṣṇaaham—Ipūrvam—firstaham—Ipūrvam—firstiti—in this waysaṁspṛśya—by touching Himremire—they enjoyed life .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadi dūraṁ gataḥ kṛṣṇo
yadi
if
dūram
to a distant place
gataḥ
went
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
vana-śobhekṣaṇāya tam
vana - śobha
the beauty of the forest
īkṣaṇāya
for visiting and enjoying
tam
unto Kṛṣṇa
ahaṁ pūrvam ahaṁ pūrvam
aham
I
pūrvam
first
aham
I
pūrvam
first
iti saṁspṛśya remire
iti
in this way
saṁspṛśya
by touching Him
remire
they enjoyed life .
Important Words
vana-śobha—the beauty of the forest
Compound: vana (forest) + śobhā (beauty). Vṛndāvana's beauty is itself a līlā-character; Kṛṣṇa goes to 'see' the forest, but the forest is also seeing Him. Acintya-bhedābheda: the dhāma and its Lord are simultaneously one and different.
aham pūrvam—I first! I first!
Pronoun + adverb: 'me, first.' Repeated twice in the verse. This is the entire grammar of sakhya-rasa — a healthy competition where Kṛṣṇa is the unanimous prize and every devotee gets to win.
saṁspṛśya—touching
From sam + spṛś- (to touch fully). Physical contact with Kṛṣṇa — what the yogīs in verse 12 explicitly cannot attain. Gauḍīyas read Vraja-rasa as the rasa of touch: Yaśodā binds Him, the gopas climb on Him, the gopīs embrace Him. Bhagavān is touchable.
remire—they enjoyed
Aorist middle of ram- (to delight). The same root as Rāma and as rāsa. The boys' enjoyment is not 'fun' in a thin sense — it is the technical rati of sakhya-bhāva exercising itself.
Sometimes Kṛṣṇa would go to a somewhat distant place to see the beauty of the forest. Then all the other boys would run to accompany Him, each one saying, “I shall be the first to run and touch Kṛṣṇa! I shall touch Kṛṣṇa first!” In this way they enjoyed life by repeatedly touching Kṛṣṇa.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Sometimes Kṛṣṇa would go to a somewhat distant place to see the beauty of the forest. Then all the other boys would run to accompany Him, each one saying, "I shall be the first to run and touch Kṛṣṇa! I shall touch Kṛṣṇa first!" In this way they enjoyed life by repeatedly touching Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary
When Krsna wandered off in the forest to see the beauty of the forest with a few boys, the others would run after him to see who could touch him first, shouting "I will touch him first" "No, I will." "No, I will."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Five verses show the special love and complete devotion to Kṛṣṇa while the boys played. Kṛṣṇa did not generally leave the boys and go far away, but if he sometimes went far off with a few friends, to see the beauty of the forest, the other boys would obtain happiness by touching him with embraces (sam—spṛśya). The attractiveness of the forest is suggested.
Related values & verses
Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Discriminative Wisdom
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-04· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a group of children racing toward a magnet — except the magnet is a boy, and the prize is not winning but touching Him first. Sakhya-rasa is competitive without being cruel: each boy wants to reach Kṛṣṇa first, and Kṛṣṇa lets every one of them think they did.
kecit—some of themveṇūn—flutesvādayantaḥ—blowingdhmāntaḥ—buglingśṛṅgāṇi—the horn bugleskecana—someone elsekecit—someonebhṛṅgaiḥ—with the bumblebeespragāyantaḥ—singing along withkūjantaḥ—imitating the sound ofkokilaiḥ—with the cuckoospare—othersvicchāyābhiḥ—with running shadowspradhāvantaḥ—someone running on the ground after the birdsgacchantaḥ—going alongsādhu—beautifulhaṁsakaiḥ—with the swansbakaiḥ—with the ducks sitting in one placeupaviśantaḥ ca—sitting silently like themnṛtyantaḥ ca—and dancing withkalāpibhiḥ—with the peacocksvikarṣantaḥ—attractingkīśa - bālān—the young monkeysārohantaḥ ca—gliding overtaiḥ—with the monkeysdrumān—the treesvikurvantaḥ ca—exactly imitating themtaiḥ—with the monkeyssākam—along withplavantaḥ ca—gliding overpalāśiṣu—on the treessākam—along withbhekaiḥ—with the frogsvilaṅghantaḥ—jumping like themsaritaḥ—the watersrava - samplutāḥ—became wet in the water of the rivervihasantaḥ—laughingpraticchāyāḥ—at the shadowsśapantaḥ ca—condemnedpratisvanān—the sound of their echoesittham—in this waysatām—of the transcendentalistsbrahma - sukha - anubhūtyā—with Kṛṣṇa, the source of brahma-sukha (Kṛṣṇa is Parabrahman, and from Him originates His personal effulgence)dāsyam—servitorshipgatānām—of the devotees who have acceptedpara - daivatena—with the Supreme Personality of Godheadmāyā - āśritānām—for those in the clutches of material energynara - dārakeṇa—with Him who is like an ordinary childsākam—along withvijahruḥ—enjoyedkṛta - puṇya - puñjāḥ—all these boys, who had accumulated the results of life after life of pious activities .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kecid veṇūn vādayanto
kecit
some of them
veṇūn
flutes
vādayantaḥ
blowing
dhmāntaḥ śṛṅgāṇi kecana
dhmāntaḥ
bugling
śṛṅgāṇi
the horn bugles
kecana
someone else
kecid bhṛṅgaiḥ pragāyantaḥ
kecit
someone
bhṛṅgaiḥ
with the bumblebees
pragāyantaḥ
singing along with
kūjantaḥ kokilaiḥ pare
kūjantaḥ
imitating the sound of
kokilaiḥ
with the cuckoos
pare
others
vicchāyābhiḥ pradhāvanto
vicchāyābhiḥ
with running shadows
pradhāvantaḥ
someone running on the ground after the birds
gacchantaḥ sādhu-haṁsakaiḥ
gacchantaḥ
going along
sādhu
beautiful
haṁsakaiḥ
with the swans
bakair upaviśantaś ca
bakaiḥ
with the ducks sitting in one place
upaviśantaḥ ca
sitting silently like them
nṛtyantaś ca kalāpibhiḥ
nṛtyantaḥ ca
and dancing with
kalāpibhiḥ
with the peacocks
vikarṣantaḥ kīśa-bālān
vikarṣantaḥ
attracting
kīśa - bālān
the young monkeys
ārohantaś ca tair drumān
ārohantaḥ ca
gliding over
taiḥ
with the monkeys
drumān
the trees
vikurvantaś ca taiḥ sākaṁ
vikurvantaḥ ca
exactly imitating them
taiḥ
with the monkeys
sākam
along with
plavantaś ca palāśiṣu
plavantaḥ ca
gliding over
palāśiṣu
on the trees
sākaṁ bhekair vilaṅghantaḥ
sākam
along with
bhekaiḥ
with the frogs
vilaṅghantaḥ
jumping like them
saritaḥ srava-samplutāḥ
saritaḥ
the water
srava - samplutāḥ
became wet in the water of the river
vihasantaḥ praticchāyāḥ
vihasantaḥ
laughing
praticchāyāḥ
at the shadows
śapantaś ca pratisvanān
śapantaḥ ca
condemned
pratisvanān
the sound of their echoes
itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā
ittham
in this way
satām
of the transcendentalists
brahma - sukha - anubhūtyā
with Kṛṣṇa, the source of brahma-sukha (Kṛṣṇa is Parabrahman, and from Him originates His personal effulgence)
dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena
dāsyam
servitorship
gatānām
of the devotees who have accepted
para - daivatena
with the Supreme Personality of Godhead
māyāśritānāṁ nara-dārakeṇa
māyā - āśritānām
for those in the clutches of material energy
nara - dārakeṇa
with Him who is like an ordinary child
sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ
sākam
along with
vijahruḥ
enjoyed
kṛta - puṇya - puñjāḥ
all these boys, who had accumulated the results of life after life of pious activities .
Important Words
brahma-sukha-anubhūtyā—by Him who is the source of brahma-sukha
Compound: brahman + sukha (bliss) + anubhūti (experience). The very Brahman that liberated yogīs taste as impersonal bliss is here playing tag with cowherd boys. Gauḍīyas cite this line as a death-blow to Advaita: brahma-sukha is a property of Kṛṣṇa, not vice versa.
dāsyam gatānām—of those who have attained the position of servants
Compound: dāsya (servitude) + gata (gone, attained). Even the impersonalists who become liberated — they reach only the dāsya-pada relative to what these boys have. Sakhya is structurally higher than impersonal mukti.
para-daivatena—with the Supreme Lord
Compound: para (highest) + daivata (deity). Śuka inserts the technical title in the middle of describing tag-play — the boy chasing peacock-shadows is the Supreme Deity. Acintya-bhedābheda in narrative form.
nara-dārakeṇa—with one who appeared as a human child
Compound: nara (human) + dāraka (child). 'Appeared as' — manuṣya-rūpeṇa, not actually a human limited being. Kṛṣṇa's humanity in Vraja is His own choice; the boys touch the Absolute in the form of their classmate.
kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ—those who have accumulated heaps of pious credit
Compound: kṛta (done) + puṇya (merit) + puñja (heap). Even sakhya in Vraja is the fruit of vast puṇya-bhakti from past lives. Gauḍīyas (esp. Sanātana Gosvāmī, Bṛhad-bhāgavatāmṛta) describe the gopas as eternally perfect souls; the 'puṇya' here is the bhakti that brought them to recognize their eternal status.
All the boys would be differently engaged. Some boys blew their flutes, and others blew bugles made of horn. Some imitated the buzzing of the bumblebees, and others imitated the voice of the cuckoo. Some boys imitated flying birds by running after the birds’ shadows on the ground, some imitated the beautiful movements and attractive postures of the swans, some sat down with the ducks, sitting silently, and others imitated the dancing of the peacocks. Some boys attracted young monkeys in the trees, some jumped into the trees, imitating the monkeys, some made faces as the monkeys were accustomed to do, and others jumped from one branch to another. Some boys went to the waterfalls and crossed over the river, jumping with the frogs, and when they saw their own reflections on the water they would laugh. They would also condemn the sounds of their own echoes. In this way, all the cowherd boys used to play with Kṛṣṇa, who is the source of the Brahman effulgence for jñānīs desiring to merge into that effulgence, who is the Supreme Personality of Godhead for devotees who have accepted eternal servitorship, and who for ordinary persons is but another ordinary child. The cowherd boys, having accumulated the results of pious activities for many lives, were able to associate in this way with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. How can one explain their great fortune?
Purport
As recommended by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, tasmāt kenāpy upāyena manaḥ kṛṣṇe niveśayet ( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.2.4). Somehow or other, whether one thinks of Kṛṣṇa as an ordinary human child, as the source of the Brahman effulgence, as the origin of Paramātmā, or as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one should concentrate one’s full attention upon the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa. That is also the instruction of Bhagavad-gītā (18.66) : sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the easiest way of directly approaching Kṛṣṇa. Īśvaraḥ sadyo hṛdy avarudhyate ’tra kṛtibhiḥ śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt ( Bhāg. 1.1.2 ). Diverting even a little of one’s attention toward Kṛṣṇa and activities in Kṛṣṇa consciousness immediately enables one to achieve the highest perfection of life. This is the purpose of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. Lokasyājānato vidvāṁś cakre sātvata-saṁhitām ( Bhāg. 1.7.6 ). The secret of success is unknown to people in general, and therefore Śrīla Vyāsadeva, being compassionate toward the poor souls in this material world, especially in this Age of Kali, has given us the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śrīmad-bhāgavataṁ purāṇam amalaṁ yad vaiṣṇavānāṁ priyam ( Bhāg. 12.13.18 ). For Vaiṣṇavas who are somewhat advanced, or who are fully aware of the glories and potencies of the Lord, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is a beloved Vedic literature. After all, we have to change this body ( tathā dehāntara-prāptiḥ ). If we do not care about Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, we do not know what the next body will be. But if one adheres to these two books — Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam — one is sure to obtain the association of Kṛṣṇa in the next life ( tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti so ’rjuna ). Therefore, distribution of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam all over the world is a great welfare activity for theologians, philosophers, transcendentalists and yogīs ( yoginām api sarveṣām ), as well as for people in general. Janma-lābhaḥ paraḥ puṁsām ante nārāyaṇa-smṛtiḥ ( Bhāg. 2.1.6 ): if we can somehow or other remember Kṛṣṇa, Nārāyaṇa, at the end of life, our life will be successful.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
All the boys would be differently engaged. Some boys blew their flutes, and others blew bugles made of horn. Some imitated the buzzing of the bumblebees, and others imitated the voice of the cuckoo. Some boys imitated flying birds by running after the birds' shadows on the ground, some imitated the beautiful movements and attractive postures of the swans, some sat down with the ducks, sitting silently, and others imitated the dancing of the peacocks. Some boys attracted young monkeys in the trees, some jumped into the trees, imitating the monkeys, some made faces as the monkeys were accustomed to do, and others jumped from one branch to another. Some boys went to the waterfalls and crossed over the river, jumping with the frogs, and when they saw their own reflections on the water they would laugh. They would also condemn the sounds of their own echoes. In this way, all the cowherd boys used to play with Kṛṣṇa, who is the source of the Brahman effulgence for jṣānīs desiring to merge into that effulgence, who is the Supreme Personality of Godhead for devotees who have accepted eternal servitorship, and who for ordinary persons is but another ordinary child. The cowherd boys, having accumulated the results of pious activities for many lives, were able to associate in this way with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. How can one explain their great fortune?
Commentary
They blew their horns (dhmantah), they chased the shadows of the birds (vichayabhih vi = vina without the birds), they pulled the tails of baby monkeys (kisa balan kisa=kidrsa what kind of) hanging from the branches, and by that climbed up into the trees. They made funny faces (vikurvantah), and with baby monkeys jumped from branch to branch. They jumped into pools of water filled up from flowing rivers with the frogs. They laughed at their own shadows, raising their arms in the air (vihasantah), and cursed their echoes. "Are (ahah), who are you speaking?" Hearing a single syllable echo back, they became angry. "What is this? Answering back to me with "re- re -re". Today you will die!" In this way they would curse again and again with no final solution.
Having previously described the playing of the cowherd boys, this verse praises the good fortune of all Vrajavasis’ above everyone elses fortune. In this world there are three types of people: jnanis, bhaktas and karmis. The word satam indicates the jnanis with some trace of devotion. The inhabitants of Vraja played with Krsna who is the knowledge and happiness of Brahman for the jnanis. By this it should be understood that Krsna’s body, with which the Vrajavasis played, contains the Brahman. The word sat cannot not apply to those jnanis who think of the body and form of Krsna as material. Dasya ganana refers to all the genuine devotees other than the inhabitants of Vraja, who see Krsna as their worshipable Lord. The Vrajavasis played with Krsna who is seen by these other devotees as their reverent Lord. The Vrajavasis played with Krsna, who is perceived by those involved in material happiness (mayasritanam) as an ordinary human (naradarakena). The jnanis have realization of Krsna , but they cannot play with him. The dasya bhaktas worship Krsna in reverence, but they are not qualified to play with Krsna. The karmis have no realization of Krsna, nor worship, since they have no respect for him, so what to speak of playing with him. And the Vrajavasis played with him. Though he is complete in bliss, they gave him more intense bliss in the pastimes of prema. And they also attained remarkable bliss in all ways. Therefore, more than all others, they were fortunate ( krta punya). This is of course a material viewpoint. For the nitya siddha inhabitants of Vraja, who surpass the jnanis and dasya bhaktas by far, the cause of the playing with Krsna cannot be material piety. Here punya can only mean activities pleasing to the Lord, by which the Lord comes under the devotee’s control.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Four verses describe what they did when he went off in the distance. Some played flutes. While they played, others blew horns in order to perfect their association with him and in order to find him quickly. Or, after touching him, they performed these individual activities in bliss to give him happiness. The word sādhu (expertly) is an adverb modifying all the verbs. They made faces like the monkeys or caught the tails of the baby monkeys on the branches and pull their tails. The creeks were filled with water from waterfalls. The creeks were narrow. They laugh on seeing their shadows since the shadows were very long. They laughed in special ways (vi), such as throwing their arms in the air. Or they imitated their reflections by making faces.
Satām refers to those who have manifested the state (sat) of their highest svarūpa or those who have the quality of sat because of closeness to Brahman. In either case it refers to jṣānīs. Anubhūti means the self-manifesting substance whose correlative is dull matter. This conscious entity is happiness. It gives happiness since, in its highest form of ātmā (Kṛṣṇa), it is the basis of the highest unconditional prema. It is called Brahman, the greatest, since is the highest svarūpa for all the jṣānīs by appearing only in that form for them. For devotees with dāsya-bhakti, he appears the most worshipable deity, full of all powers. In order to show the greatness of Kṛṣṇa, these two realizations are shown to be very rare by showing the opposite. Those who are covered by māyā think of Kṛṣṇa as a human child since they have no jṣāna or bhakti. The boys did not play with Kṛṣṇa in that form. The boys played with Kṛṣṇa who gave them his association because he was controlled by their prema. “They had accrued heaps of piety.” This is a mundane statement. Actually they had piles of pure splendor (puṇya) caused by the highest mercy of the Lord who performs pastimes (kṛta). Amara-koṣa says puṇya means splendor (cāru).
Śukadeva’s intention is to show that Kṛṣṇa is an extraordinary form of aiśvarya and madhurya: he is the form of the highest bliss; he has unlimited natural control with unequalled powers; he is attractive to all by his unequalled sweetness; he has natural excellence in his form, qualities and pastimes. The means of the different realizations are jṣāna, bhakti mixed with reverence and pure bhakti without reverence. Without these three methods, people of the material world will only a shadow realization of the Lord since they cannot contact him at all. Gītā says nāhaṁ prakāśaḥ sarvasysa yogamāyāsamāvṛtaḥ: I am not revealed to everyone, since I am covered by my yoga-māyā. (BG 9.25)
taṁ brahma paramaṁ sākṣād bhagavantam adhokṣajam
manuṣya-dṛṣṭyā duṣprajṣā martyātmāno na menire
They failed to recognize that he is the Supreme Absolute Truth, the directly manifest lord, whom the material senses cannot ordinarily perceive. Thus bewildered by their false identification with the mortal body, they did not show him proper respect. SB 10.23.11
The status of realization is as stated in the verse. The realization of the Lord with power is more complete than realization of Brahman.
yasyāsti bhaktir bhagavaty akiṣcanā
sarvair guṇais tatra samāsate surāḥ
The devatās constantly dwell with all good qualities in that person who has pure bhakti for the Lord. SB 15.18.12
It is complete because it contains within it all aspects of knowledge of the Lord. Bhaktyā mām abhijānāti yāvān yaś cāsmi tattvataḥ: only by devotion does a person know me as I am. (BG 18.55) However pure bhakti without reverence is more praiseworthy than bhakti with reverence:
aho bhāgyam aho bhāgyaṁ nanda-gopa-vrajaukasām
yan-mitraṁ paramānandaṁ pūrṇaṁ brahma sanātanam
How greatly fortunate are Nanda Mahārāja, the cowherd men and all the other inhabitants of Vraja! There is no limit to their good fortune, because the Absolute Truth, the source of transcendental bliss, the eternal Supreme Brahman, has become their friend. SB 10.14.32
Thus one realizes one’s svarūpa by impersonal jṣāna. One realizes the Lord with power by bhakti mixed with reverence. One realizes the Lord with sweetness by knowledge filled with prīti. The manifestation of the highest sweetness of the Lord cannot be known by the impersonal jṣānīs. It is not sufficiently achieved by persons with dāsya-bhāva because the bhakti cannot comprehend the Lord fully with a heart restricted by reverence. But in considering the absolute entity (in all its forms), that intimate realization is most relishable:
ātmārāmāś ca munayo nirgranthā apy urukrame |
kurvanty ahaitukīṁ bhaktim ittham-bhūta-guṇo hariḥ ||
Some sages who are ātmārāmas, beyond the scriptures, false ego and rules, also practice unmotivated, pure bhakti to the master of pure bhakti, Kṛṣṇa, since he possesses qualities attractive to even them. SB 1.7.10
pariniṣṭhito ’pi nairguṇya uttama-śloka-līlayā
gṛhīta-cetā rājarṣe ākhyānaṁ yad adhītavān
Though I was fixed in Brahman and beyond the guṇas, my mind became attracted to the pastimes of the Lord. I thus learned about his pastimes. I will tell them to you. SB 2.1.9
Kṛṣṇa is the ocean of all powers. brahmā bhavo ’ham api yasya kalāḥ kalāyāḥ śrīś codvahema ciram: great demigods like Brahmā and Śiva, and even the goddess of fortune and I, are simply parts of his spiritual identity, and we also carefully carry that dust on our heads (SB 10.68.37) Balarāma took him as a friend: bhrātṛ-sneha-pariplutaḥ. (SB 10.53.20) With his friends in Vraja he acted as follows:
vṛṣāyamāṇau nardantau yuyudhāte parasparam
anukṛtya rutair jantūṁś ceratuḥ prākṛtau yathā
Sometimes like bulls they roared loudly with the other boys disguised as cows and bulls and would fight with one another, roaring loudly, and sometimes they would imitate the voices of the animals. In this way they wandered about, exactly like two ordinary human children. SB 10.11.40
Their prīti as friends, with no restriction of reverence, expands at every moment because of its lack of restriction and its special nature with fullness. Kṛṣṇa’s heart responds to that and, accordingly, his friends realize the exceptional sweetness of his form, qualities and astonishing pastimes. What more can be said? Like churning the ocean to get nectar, such intimate love produces the highest sweetness and control of Kṛṣṇa because of their sweet love. This is not seen in the jṣānī or the devotee with reverence but in all the people of Vraja. That he has given such pastimes to all of Vraja (kṛta-puṇya-puṇjāḥ) is most astonishing to us. Or, the first line can be explained as before. Now, in this avatāra, even the materialists realize Kṛṣṇa as a sweet child by his mercy. Or, those who take shelter of his mercy (another meaning of māyā) realize Kṛṣṇa as the highest form of sweetness, a small child. They also played with him.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
He was easily realized (sukhānubhūtyā) as ātma-tattvam (brahman) by the liberated, who exist in a state of mere existence (satām). They consider that this is the highest goal. Or for the devotees (satām) he was Bhagavān, the form of happiness or prema-bhakti, most worthy of worship. For the ignorant he was that which destroys the jīva--liberation. Or for the gopīs who served Kātyāyanī with great faith to attain Kṛṣṇa (though this happened in the future, it was discussed by Śukadeva and Parīkṣit at this time), he appeared as a beautiful human child (nāradārakena). He appeared in this way to them because of their great prema. Or he appeared as happiness (kena for ka, happiness) for the groups of women (nāra-dara). This would be suitable for the list which starts with the inferior (liberated souls) and ends with best (the gopīs).
Pūnya refers to bhakti as in dharmo madbhakti-kṛt proktaḥ: dharma is performing bhakti to me. (11.19.27) The boys must have performed lots of hearing etc. as sādhana. Or they did piles of meditation on the Lord in Satya-yuga (kṛta). Or they had accomplished (kṛta) piles of anurāga (puṇya). The gopīs’ rati was not fulfilled during the day because of separation and even at night was not fulfilled with comfort (compared to these boys easily associating with Kṛṣna).
akṣaṇvatāṁ phalam idaṁ na paraṁ vidāmaḥ
sakhyaḥ paśūn anaviveśayator vayasyaiḥ
vaktraṁ vrajeśa-sutayor anu veṇu juṣṭaṁ
yair vā nipītam anurakta-kaṭākṣa-mokṣam
The cowherd girls said: O friends! We do not know any other success for those with eyes than the face of the younger one who plays the flute--the face experienced as he casts a side glance of love, the face tasted by people with eyes-- as the two sons of Nanda take the cows from forest to forest along with their friends. SB 10.21.7
Śukadeva desires that the gopīs could associate in the same way as the boys did. Thus he uses the word ittham (in this way) in the present verse.
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Kritajnata (Gratitude)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Satya (Truthfulness)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Picture a forest classroom with no teacher and every child improvising: one is the bee, one is the cuckoo, one is the swan, one is the peacock — and the Person they are all unconsciously imitating, the original of every beauty, is playing among them as one of them. The yogīs in the next verse fail to grasp by austerity what these boys are absent-mindedly hugging.
Stories
Caitanya in Vraja, overwhelmed by sakhya-recognition
Caitanya-caritāmṛta records that when Mahāprabhu wandered the forests around Vṛndāvana, He would sometimes throw Himself on the ground, mistaking a bush for Kṛṣṇa or a peacock's cry for the boy He had lost. Twelve generations after the Gosvāmīs had recovered the places, the bhāva of the cowherd boys was still palpable in the dust.
This is the rasa Śuka describes — a forest so saturated with Kṛṣṇa that imitating peacocks and frogs becomes a form of association with Him. Sakhya is not lower than mādhurya; it is its own complete world.
యత్పాదపాంసుర్బహుజన్మకృచ్ఛ్రతో
ధృతాత్మభిర్యోగిభిరప్యలభ్య: ।
స ఏవ యద్ దృగ్విషయ: స్వయం స్థిత:
కిం వర్ణ్యతే దిష్టమతో వ్రజౌకసామ్ ॥ ౧౨ ॥
yat-pāda-pāṁsur bahu-janma-kṛcchrato
[yat-paada-paamsur bahu-janma-krichchrato]
dhṛtātmabhir yogibhir apy alabhyaḥ
[dhritaatmabhir yogibhir apy alabhyah]
sa eva yad-dṛg-viṣayaḥ svayaṁ sthitaḥ
[sa eva yad-drig-vishayah svayam sthitah]
kiṁ varṇyate diṣṭam ato vrajaukasām
[kim varnyate dishtam ato vrajaukasaam]
Word-for-word
yat—whosepāda - pāṁsuḥ—dust of the lotus feetbahu - janma—in many birthskṛcchrataḥ—from undergoing severe austerities and penances as a way of practicing yoga, meditation, etc.dhṛta - ātmabhiḥ—by persons able to control the mindyogibhiḥ—by such yogīs ( jñana-yogīs, rāja-yogīs, dhyāna-yogīs, etc.)api—indeedalabhyaḥ—cannot be achievedsaḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godheadeva—indeedyat - dṛk - viṣayaḥ—has become the object of direct vision, face to facesvayam—personallysthitaḥ—present in front of themkim—whatvarṇyate—can be describeddiṣṭam—about the fortuneataḥ—thereforevraja - okasām—of the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yat-pāda-pāṁsur bahu-janma-kṛcchrato
yat
whose
pāda - pāṁsuḥ
dust of the lotus feet
bahu - janma
in many births
kṛcchrataḥ
from undergoing severe austerities and penances as a way of practicing yoga, meditation, etc.
dhṛtātmabhir yogibhir apy alabhyaḥ
dhṛta - ātmabhiḥ
by persons able to control the mind
yogibhiḥ
by such yogīs ( jñana-yogīs, rāja-yogīs, dhyāna-yogīs, etc.)
api
indeed
alabhyaḥ
cannot be achieved
sa eva yad-dṛg-viṣayaḥ svayaṁ sthitaḥ
saḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
eva
indeed
yat - dṛk - viṣayaḥ
has become the object of direct vision, face to face
svayam
personally
sthitaḥ
present in front of them
kiṁ varṇyate diṣṭam ato vrajaukasām
kim
what
varṇyate
can be described
diṣṭam
about the fortune
ataḥ
therefore
vraja - okasām
of the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana .
Important Words
pāda-pāṁsuḥ—dust of the lotus feet
Compound: pāda (foot) + pāṁsu (dust). The Gauḍīya superlative — even the dust of Kṛṣṇa's feet is unattainable by birth after birth of yoga. Uddhava prays in 10.47 to be born as a blade of grass in Vraja just to touch this dust.
bahu-janma—for many births
Compound: bahu (many) + janma (birth). Yoga is multi-life; Vraja-bhakti is one-life. Sambandha with Kṛṣṇa, once awakened, bypasses the long arc.
yogibhiḥ—by yogīs
Yogī here is the technical aṣṭāṅga-yogī of yama-niyama-āsana-prāṇāyāma — not the bhakti-yogī. Gauḍīyas distinguish: bhakti-yoga is itself the highest yoga (Gītā 6.47), and these Vraja-boys are the supreme bhakti-yogīs, though no one calls them that.
yat-dṛk-viṣayaḥ—who is the object of their direct vision
Compound: yat (whom) + dṛk (vision) + viṣaya (object). The same Lord the yogīs strain to glimpse is the visible object of the gopas' eyes. Sākṣāt-darśana is the rasa of Vraja.
vraja-okasām—of the inhabitants of Vraja
Compound: vraja (the cowherd settlement) + okas (dweller). Vraja-okas is a Gauḍīya technical term: the eternally-perfect residents of Kṛṣṇa-līlā. Rūpa Gosvāmī's Upadeśāmṛta 9 names Vraja the supreme dhāma, and its dwellers the supreme devotees.
Yogīs may undergo severe austerities and penances for many births by practicing yama, niyama, āsana and prāṇāyāma, none of which are easily performed. Yet in due course of time, when these yogīs attain the perfection of controlling the mind, they will still be unable to taste even a particle of dust from the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. What then can we describe about the great fortune of the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana, with whom the Supreme Personality of Godhead personally lived and who saw the Lord face to face?
Purport
We can simply imagine the great fortune of the inhabitants of Vṛndāvana. It is impossible to describe how, after many, many births of pious activities, they have become so fortunate.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Yogīs may undergo severe austerities and penances for many births by practicing yama, niyama, āsana and prāṇāyāma, none of which are easily performed. Yet in due course of time, when these yogīs attain the perfection of controlling the mind, they will still be unable to taste even a particle of dust from the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. What then can we describe about the great fortune of the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana, with whom the Supreme Personality of Godhead personally lived and who saw the Lord face to face?
Commentary
What to speak of playing with Krsna, even establishing a relationship with Krsna is very rare. That is the intent of this verse. The yogis do not attain even one particle of dust of Krsna’s feet (pada pamsuh). Or the yogis do not attain even one particle of reflected light from the trees of Vrndavana (padapa-tree, amsuh -particle). Those who are fully concentrating their minds (drtatmabhih) cannot attain him. It was mentioned earlier that Krsna is not sukhapa, not easily attained. Svayam sthita, being self situated, indicates that seeing him does not depend even on sadhana. Oh what great fortune (distam aho)! Or dista maho, a happy festival. Who can describe the good fortune or happiness of the Vrajavasis who see Krsna, unobtainable by yogis who cannot even attain a particle of dust at his feet after concentrating their minds for lifetimes?
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Not even considering the great fortune of their constant playing with the Lord, great souls cannot even attain the fortune of seeing Kṛṣṇa, which all the people of Vraja see. They cannot even a grain of dust from his feet. This means that they cannot establish any sort of relationship with him. Or they cannot attain a ray of the trees such as the kadamba (pādapā + aṁśuḥ) of Vraja. Or, they cannot see from far away even a ray of the devotees who drink (gaze at) the Lord’s feet (pāda + pā -to drink) with prema, though the yogīs, on attaining samādhi, have made their minds steady by hardships of pratyāhara, yama and niyama for many lives. That person, Svayam Bhagavān (saḥ eva), whom they see directly with their eyes, is situated in his svarūpa or nature (svayam), is firmly, eternally existing there (sthitaḥ) with them. This usage is similar to yac ca kiṁcij jagat sarvaṁ vypapya nārāyaṇaḥ sthitaḥ: Nārāyaṇa, who is the whole universe and is spread everywhere, exists there eternally. (Mahā-nārāyaṇa Upaniṣad) In amazement he says “Ah! How can one describe their good fortune (diṣṭam)?” Or how can one describe what has been fixed (diṣṭam), their great festival of joy? It cannot be described at all.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-05· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
A king's gardener sweats for forty years to glimpse the king through the lattice, and the king's own children — never noticing — wrestle in His lap. Yoga is the gardener's discipline; Vraja is the children's home. Both have their dignity, but only one ends in His arms.
Stories
Saubhari Muni's yoga and the gopīs' love
Saubhari, the great yogī of Bhāgavatam 9.6, performed austerities underwater for years yet ultimately fell when he saw the fish mating. Yoga without bhakti — even severe yoga — has no traction in the heart.
Gauḍīyas contrast Saubhari's struggle with the gopas' ease: the boys in 10.12 attain what Saubhari could not, simply by being where Kṛṣṇa was. The verse is Śuka's open declaration that bhakti — even artless boyish bhakti — outranks all aṣṭāṅga-yoga.
atha—thereafteragha - nāma—a very powerful demon by the name Aghaabhyapatat—appeared on the spotmahā - asuraḥ—a great, extremely powerful demonteṣām—of the cowherd boyssukha - krīḍana—the enjoyment of their transcendental pastimesvīkṣaṇa - akṣamaḥ—being unable to see, he could not tolerate the transcendental happiness of the cowherd boysnityam—perpetuallyyat - antaḥ—the end of the life of Aghāsuranija - jīvita - īpsubhiḥ—just to live undisturbed by Aghāsurapīta - amṛtaiḥ api—although they drank nectar every dayamaraiḥ—by such demigodspratīkṣyate—was also being awaited (the demigods were also awaiting the death of the great demon Aghāsura) .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
athāgha-nāmābhyapatan mahāsuras
atha
thereafter
agha - nāma
a very powerful demon by the name Agha
abhyapatat
appeared on the spot
mahā - asuraḥ
a great, extremely powerful demon
teṣāṁ sukha-krīḍana-vīkṣaṇākṣamaḥ
teṣām
of the cowherd boys
sukha - krīḍana
the enjoyment of their transcendental pastimes
vīkṣaṇa - akṣamaḥ
being unable to see, he could not tolerate the transcendental happiness of the cowherd boys
nityaṁ yad-antar nija-jīvitepsubhiḥ
nityam
perpetually
yat - antaḥ
the end of the life of Aghāsura
nija - jīvita - īpsubhiḥ
just to live undisturbed by Aghāsura
pītāmṛtair apy amaraiḥ pratīkṣyate
pīta - amṛtaiḥ api
although they drank nectar every day
amaraiḥ
by such demigods
pratīkṣyate
was also being awaited (the demigods were also awaiting the death of the great demon Aghāsura) .
Important Words
agha-nāma—named Agha (sin)
Agha literally means sin / evil. The demon's name itself is his function — a personification of pāpa. Gauḍīyas note that Kṛṣṇa's contact dissolves him utterly: Agha attains sārūpya-mukti in verse 38, which Śuka calls otherwise impossible for the impure.
mahā-asuraḥ—great demon
Compound: mahā (great) + asura (a-sura, non-deva). The asuras of Bhāgavatam are not metaphors — they are real beings opposed to Viṣṇu. Their 'greatness' is in size and power, not virtue.
sukha-krīḍana—joyful play
Compound: sukha (joy) + krīḍana (play). What Aghāsura cannot tolerate is precisely the rasa Śuka has just described. Demoniac nature is constitutively unable to bear the sight of bhakti-sukha; it must attack.
pīta-amṛtaiḥ—by those who have drunk nectar
Compound: pīta (drunk) + amṛta (nectar). The devas drank amṛta from the milk-ocean churning. Yet amṛta only extends life — it does not remove fear. Gauḍīyas: amṛta is not the same as Kṛṣṇa-prema; long life without bhakti is still anxious.
My dear King Parīkṣit, thereafter there appeared a great demon named Aghāsura, whose death was being awaited even by the demigods. The demigods drank nectar every day, but still they feared this great demon and awaited his death. This demon could not tolerate the transcendental pleasure being enjoyed in the forest by the cowherd boys.
Purport
One may ask how Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes could be interrupted by a demon. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura answers this question by saying that although the transcendental pleasure being enjoyed by the cowherd boys could not be stopped, unless they stopped the transcendental pleasure of their various activities they could not eat their lunch. Therefore at lunchtime Aghāsura appeared by the arrangement of Yoga-māyā, so that for the time being they could stop their activities and take lunch. Changing varieties is the mother of enjoyment. The cowherd boys would continuously play, then stop, and then again enjoy in a different way. Therefore every day a demon would come and interrupt their sporting pastimes. The demon would be killed, and then the boys would engage again in their transcendental pastimes.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear King Parīkṣit, thereafter there appeared a great demon named Aghāsura, whose death was being awaited even by the demigods. The demigods drank nectar every day, but still they feared this great demon and awaited his death. This demon could not tolerate the transcendental pleasure being enjoyed in the forest by the cowherd boys.
Commentary
The lila sakti of the Lord, seeing that the bliss of the boys from playing was increasing and increasing at ever moment, and was not possible for them to stop playing, and seeing that without stopping playing they could not eat and that the eating time had already passed, and seeing that it was also necessary to kill the demon, brought the Aghasura demon towards the boys, inspiring him through paramatma. Aghasura could not tolerate the fun the boys were having. The playing gave them pleasure, but gave him suffering. The devatas (amaraih), who drank amrta, were afraid of death from the demon, and therefore were waiting for his death ( yad antah). Yad can also refer to the playing and antah can mean in the heart. In that case the meaning would be: Aghasura could not tolerate the playing, which was meditated upon by the devata, which alone gave them desire to maintain their lives (nija jivtepsubhih), though they already drank amrta.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Atha indicates a different topic with a different rasa from the present topic. Agha suddenly came in front of them (abhyapatāt). He could not tolerate seeing their joyful playing. The verb abhūt (existed) should be added. Śrīdhara Svāmī explains. The devatās, though they had drunk nectar, were fearful of death, and thus waited for his weak point (antaḥ), thinking “When and how will he die?” He gives another explanation. Agha could not tolerate the playing which the devatās who had drunk nectar were contemplating in their hearts (antar). Their lives were not fulfilled just by drinking nectar. They were fulfilled by remembering the pastimes of the Lord. Thus they constantly contemplated him.
Or, the meaning can be “Even though the devatās were fully absorbed (pīta) in liberation (amṛta), they awaited his death.” They wanted to live long in order see the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa. They were without death (amaraiḥ) because of accepting bodies for pastimes, or their subtle and gross bodies were without destruction. It is said muktā api līlayā vigrahaṁ kṛtvā bhajante: even the liberated accept forms and participate in the pastimes. The devatās were expecting (pratīkṣyate) the pastimes. (Śrīdhara Svāmī’s commentary on Nṛsimha-tāpanī Upaniṣad)
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-06· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a serpent so vast that even those who drink amṛta daily are still afraid — the demigods' immortality does not free them from fear, because fear is not removed by living long but by taking shelter of Kṛṣṇa. The boys playing tag in the previous verses have no nectar and no fear; the devas have nectar and are terrified.
Stories
Gajendra crying out from the lake
Gajendra, king of elephants (SB 8.2–3), was held by a crocodile for a thousand celestial years. None of his elephant strength, none of the demigods, could free him. Only when he abandoned all hope in his own power and called Bhagavān's name did the Lord arrive on Garuḍa.
Aghāsura is the cosmic crocodile of this chapter. The devas fear him from behind clouds; only Kṛṣṇa's direct intervention removes the threat. Gauḍīyas read both episodes as instances of śaraṇāgati — the rakṣiṣyatīti viśvāsa limb: 'He will surely protect.'
దృష్ట్వార్భకాన్ కృష్ణముఖానఘాసుర:
కంసానుశిష్ట: స బకీబకానుజ: ।
అయం తు మే సోదరనాశకృత్తయో-
ర్ద్వయోర్మమైనం సబలం హనిష్యే ॥ ౧౪ ॥
dṛṣṭvārbhakān kṛṣṇa-mukhān aghāsuraḥ
[drishtvaarbhakaan krishna-mukhaan aghaasurah]
kaṁsānuśiṣṭaḥ sa bakī-bakānujaḥ
[kamsaanushishtah sa bakee-bakaanujah]
ayaṁ tu me sodara-nāśa-kṛt tayor
[ayam tu me sodara-naasha-krit tayor]
dvayor mamainaṁ sa-balaṁ haniṣye
[dvayor mamainam sa-balam hanishye]
Word-for-word
dṛṣṭvā—after seeingarbhakān—all the cowherd boyskṛṣṇa - mukhān—headed by Kṛṣṇaaghāsuraḥ—the demon by the name Aghāsurakaṁsa - anuśiṣṭaḥ—sent by Kaṁsasaḥ—he (Aghāsura)bakī - baka - anujaḥ—the younger brother of Pūtanā and Bakāsuraayam—this Kṛṣṇatu—indeedme—mysodara - nāśa - kṛt—the killer of my brother and sistertayoḥ—for my brother and sisterdvayoḥ—for those twomama—myenam—Kṛṣṇasa - balam—along with His assistants, the cowherd boyshaniṣye—I shall kill .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛṣṭvārbhakān kṛṣṇa-mukhān aghāsuraḥ
dṛṣṭvā
after seeing
arbhakān
all the cowherd boys
kṛṣṇa - mukhān
headed by Kṛṣṇa
aghāsuraḥ
the demon by the name Aghāsura
kaṁsānuśiṣṭaḥ sa bakī-bakānujaḥ
kaṁsa - anuśiṣṭaḥ
sent by Kaṁsa
saḥ
he (Aghāsura)
bakī - baka - anujaḥ
the younger brother of Pūtanā and Bakāsura
ayaṁ tu me sodara-nāśa-kṛt tayor
ayam
this Kṛṣṇa
tu
indeed
me
my
sodara - nāśa - kṛt
the killer of my brother and sister
tayoḥ
for my brother and sister
dvayor mamainaṁ sa-balaṁ haniṣye
dvayoḥ
for those two
mama
my
enam
Kṛṣṇa
sa - balam
along with His assistants, the cowherd boys
haniṣye
I shall kill .
Important Words
kaṁsa-anuśiṣṭaḥ—instructed by Kaṁsa
Compound: Kaṁsa (the demoniac king) + anuśiṣṭa (instructed). The Vraja-līlā has a political subplot — Kaṁsa is the cause of every demon attack. Gauḍīyas note: Kaṁsa's enmity functions as inverted bhakti (vairānubandha); he attains liberation by death at Kṛṣṇa's hands.
bakī-baka-anujaḥ—younger brother of Pūtanā and Baka
Compound: bakī (the female demon, i.e. Pūtanā) + baka (the heron demon) + anuja (younger brother). The three asuras are siblings — Pūtanā 10.6, Bakāsura 10.11, Aghāsura 10.12. Vraja-līlā has a family of demons being progressively absorbed.
sodara-nāśa-kṛt—killer of my siblings
Compound: sodara (uterine sibling) + nāśa (destruction) + kṛt (doer). Demoniac logic: my family is killed, therefore the killer must be killed. The very logic that brings him to Kṛṣṇa is what consumes him.
haniṣye—I shall kill
Future of han- (to strike, kill). The same root as in Bhagavad-gītā 2.19's na hanti na hanyate — 'one neither kills nor is killed.' Aghāsura's intent to kill the Unkillable becomes the comedy of the chapter.
Aghāsura, who had been sent by Kaṁsa, was the younger brother of Pūtanā and Bakāsura. Therefore when he came and saw Kṛṣṇa at the head of all the cowherd boys, he thought, “This Kṛṣṇa has killed my sister and brother, Pūtanā and Bakāsura. Therefore, in order to please them both, I shall kill this Kṛṣṇa, along with His assistants, the other cowherd boys.”
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Aghāsura, who had been sent by Kaṁsa, was the younger brother of Pūtanā and Bakāsura. Therefore when he came and saw Kṛṣṇa at the head of all the cowherd boys, he thought, "This Kṛṣṇa has killed my sister and brother, Pūtanā and Bakāsura. Therefore, in order to please them both, I shall kill this Kṛṣṇa, along with His assistants, the other cowherd boys."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Because they killed my brother and sister, I will kill them. Instead of mama sometimes atha is seen. The version with mama is accepted by all including Citsukha. Using atha avoids repeating the word “my” twice (me and mama). Kṛṣṇa was the killer of my brother and sister, of those two. Therefore I will kill him. Or, Kṛṣṇa was the killer of my brother and sister. To show enmity on their behalf (tayoḥ dvayoḥ) I will kill him.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-07· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a younger brother sworn to avenge two older siblings already killed in battle — except the 'older siblings' are the witch Pūtanā and the heron Bakāsura, and the boy he means to kill is the Supreme Person Himself. Vendetta misunderstood as strategy: Aghāsura thinks he is the third arrow; he is actually the third gift.
Stories
Pūtanā receiving the place of a nurse
Pūtanā came to murder the infant Kṛṣṇa by poisoning her own breasts (SB 10.6). Yet because she had put on a mother's form and offered her breast — even with murderous intent — Kṛṣṇa accepted her as a nursemaid and gave her a position in His eternal līlā (SB 10.6.35).
Gauḍīyas read this as the principle that operates again here for Agha: contact with Kṛṣṇa, even hostile contact, purifies. Aghāsura comes to kill his sister's killer, and ends as the Lord's associate in verse 38.
ete—this Kṛṣṇa and His associates, the cowherd boysyadā—whenmat - suhṛdoḥ—of my brother and sistertila - āpaḥ kṛtāḥ—become the last ritualistic ceremonial offering of sesame and watertadā—at that timenaṣṭa - samāḥ—without lifevraja - okasaḥ—all the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvanaprāṇe—when the vital forcegate—has been thrown out of the bodyvarṣmasu—as far as the body is concernedkā—whatnu—indeedcintā—considerationprajā - asavaḥ—those whose love for their children is the same as their love for their own lifeprāṇa - bhṛtaḥ—those living beingshi—indeedye te—all the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ete yadā mat-suhṛdos tilāpaḥ
ete
this Kṛṣṇa and His associates, the cowherd boys
yadā
when
mat - suhṛdoḥ
of my brother and sister
tila - āpaḥ kṛtāḥ
become the last ritualistic ceremonial offering of sesame and water
kṛtās tadā naṣṭa-samā vrajaukasaḥ
tadā
at that time
naṣṭa - samāḥ
without life
vraja - okasaḥ
all the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana
prāṇe gate varṣmasu kā nu cintā
prāṇe
when the vital force
gate
has been thrown out of the body
varṣmasu
as far as the body is concerned
kā
what
nu
indeed
cintā
consideration
prajāsavaḥ prāṇa-bhṛto hi ye te
prajā - asavaḥ
those whose love for their children is the same as their love for their own life
prāṇa - bhṛtaḥ
those living beings
hi
indeed
ye te
all the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi .
Important Words
tila-āpaḥ—sesame and water offering for the dead
Compound: tila (sesame) + āpa (water). The traditional śrāddha offering. Aghāsura grotesquely re-imagines Kṛṣṇa and the boys as the funeral offering for his dead siblings — a black inversion of yajña.
naṣṭa-samāḥ—as good as dead
Compound: naṣṭa (lost, destroyed) + sama (equivalent). The Vrajavāsīs, if separated from Kṛṣṇa, are 'equivalent to dead' — Gauḍīyas read this as the technical state of viraha (separation), which is itself a form of intensified bhakti.
vraja-okasaḥ—the residents of Vraja
Compound: vraja + okas. Vraja-okasaḥ is the technical name for the residents whose entire prāṇa is Kṛṣṇa — Nanda, Yaśodā, the gopas, the gopīs. Their love is so total that physical death follows separation.
prāṇa-bhṛtaḥ—those who carry the life-air
Compound: prāṇa (life-air) + bhṛt (bearer). The 'bearers' of prāṇa — i.e. the living — are those for whom Kṛṣṇa is the prāṇa-of-prāṇa. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa is prāṇasya-prāṇa (Bhagavad-gītā 7.10), the life of life itself.
Aghāsura thought: If somehow or other I can make Kṛṣṇa and His associates serve as the last offering of sesame and water for the departed souls of my brother and sister, then the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, for whom these boys are the life and soul, will automatically die. If there is no life, there is no need for the body; consequently, when their sons are dead, naturally all the inhabitants of Vraja will die.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Aghāsura thought: If somehow or other I can make Kṛṣṇa and His associates serve as the last offering of sesame and water for the departed souls of my brother and sister, then the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, for whom these boys are the life and soul, will automatically die. If there is no life, there is no need for the body; consequently, when their sons are dead, naturally all the inhabitants of Vraja will die.
Commentary
Seeing Krsna and the others (krsna mukhan), Aghasura (sah), the younger brother of Putana (baki) and Bakasura, began to consider (vyavasya-- see verse 16. verse 14 second half and 15 are Aghasura’s thoughts), "This person (ayam tu) has killed my older sister Putana (baki) and my brother (baka) (sodara nasa krt). Therefore (atha) I will kill him on their behalf, as a pinda offering along with his followers (sabalam). If Krsna and the other boys become the offering to the pretas (tilapah) for my brother and sister (mat suhrdoh), Nanda and the other inhabitants of Vraja will naturally die. If the life has left the body do we have to worry about the bodies (varsmasu)? Those who live ( ye prana bhutah), live through their children (te prajasavah). Therefore if Krsna, their child, dies, they will die, without our having to kill them."
Imagine a thief reasoning that to kill a city he need only kill its children — because once the children are dead, the parents will follow from grief. Aghāsura has correctly diagnosed Vraja's heart: Kṛṣṇa and the boys are the prāṇa of Vrajavāsīs. He has misdiagnosed only one thing — that any death is possible here.
iti—in this wayvyavasya—decidingājagaram—pythonbṛhat vapuḥ—a very, very large bodysaḥ—Aghāsurayojana - āyāma—occupying eight miles of landmahā - adri - pīvaram—as thick as a great mountaindhṛtvā—assuming this formadbhutam—wonderfulvyātta—spreadguhā - ānanam—having a mouth resembling a big cave in a mountaintadā—at that timepathi—on the roadvyaśeta—occupiedgrasana - āśayā—expecting to swallow all the cowherd boyskhalaḥ—the most crooked .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti vyavasyājagaraṁ bṛhad vapuḥ
iti
in this way
vyavasya
deciding
ājagaram
python
bṛhat vapuḥ
a very, very large body
sa yojanāyāma-mahādri-pīvaram
saḥ
Aghāsura
yojana - āyāma
occupying eight miles of land
mahā - adri - pīvaram
as thick as a great mountain
dhṛtvādbhutaṁ vyātta-guhānanaṁ tadā
dhṛtvā
assuming this form
adbhutam
wonderful
vyātta
spread
guhā - ānanam
having a mouth resembling a big cave in a mountain
tadā
at that time
pathi vyaśeta grasanāśayā khalaḥ
pathi
on the road
vyaśeta
occupied
grasana - āśayā
expecting to swallow all the cowherd boys
khalaḥ
the most crooked .
Important Words
ājagaram—a python form
From ajagara (python). The python is the largest non-mythic Indian serpent, but Aghāsura's body is mountain-scale. Gauḍīyas note: the python in Bhāgavatam (e.g. Nahuṣa in 6.13, Sudarśana in 10.34) is a recurring shape for cursed or demonized beings.
yojana-āyāma—eight miles in length
Compound: yojana (~ 8 miles) + āyāma (extension). The traditional cosmographic unit. Bhāgavatam is precise about size — the body of the demon is not vague, it is measurable. Kṛṣṇa's expansion in verse 30 will exceed it.
mahā-adri-pīvaram—as thick as a great mountain
Compound: mahā (great) + adri (mountain) + pīvara (thick). The Vraja landscape has Govardhana, a real mountain, just to the south. Aghāsura mimics that scale — Vraja's true mountain is Govardhana, lifted in chapter 25; this is its parody.
guhā-ānanam—mouth like a cave
Compound: guhā (cave) + ānana (mouth). The cave-mouth is what allows the cowherd boys to mistake the demon for forest scenery in the next verse. The līlā uses optical ambiguity — Kṛṣṇa's pastimes often run on what looks like one thing but is another.
khalaḥ—the wicked one
khala — the morally crooked. Bhāgavatam uses khala specifically for demoniac beings whose envy is constitutional. Distinct from a person who happens to act badly; this is character, not behavior.
After thus deciding, that crooked Aghāsura assumed the form of a huge python, as thick as a big mountain and as long as eight miles. Having assumed this wonderful python’s body, he spread his mouth like a big cave in the mountains and lay down on the road, expecting to swallow Kṛṣṇa and His associates the cowherd boys.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
After thus deciding, that crooked Aghāsura assumed the form of a huge python, as thick as a big mountain and as long as eight miles. Having assumed this wonderful python's body, he spread his mouth like a big cave in the mountains and lay down on the road, expecting to swallow Kṛṣṇa and His associates the cowherd boys.
Commentary
Thinking in this way, Aghasura lay on the path in order to devour Krsna. He was a yojana in length (eight miles). He was as fat (pivaram) as a huge mountain (mahadri). His mouth spread open (vyattam) like a cave.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Resolving (vyavsya) thus, he spread himself out without moving since he was a cheating killer (khalaḥ), inclined to swallow little boys.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Resolving (vyavsya) thus, at that moment (tadā), he spread himself out without moving since he was a cheating killer (khalaḥ), who could easily swallow them all by tricky means. He would swallow them all at once since he was a python. Or he was cruel, with a proclivity for eating such boys.
Picture a hunter setting a trap so large that he himself disappears into it — a cave-mouth across the entire road, a serpent the length of eight miles. The geometry is unmistakable: only one road, only one way through, only one mouth. Aghāsura has made himself into the very door of his own death.
dharā—on the surface of the globeadhara - oṣṭhaḥ—whose lower lipjalada - uttara - oṣṭhaḥ—whose upper lip was touching the cloudsdarī - ānana - antaḥ—whose mouth was expanded very widely like a mountain cavegiri - śṛṅga—like a mountain peakdaṁṣṭraḥ—whose teethdhvānta - antaḥ - āsyaḥ—within whose mouth the atmosphere was as dark as possiblevitata - adhva - jihvaḥ—whose tongue was like a broad wayparuṣa - anila - śvāsa—whose breath was like a warm winddava - īkṣaṇa - uṣṇaḥ—and whose glance was like flames of fire .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharādharoṣṭho jaladottaroṣṭho
dharā
on the surface of the globe
adhara - oṣṭhaḥ
whose lower lip
jalada - uttara - oṣṭhaḥ
whose upper lip was touching the clouds
dary-ānanānto giri-śṛṅga-daṁṣṭraḥ
darī - ānana - antaḥ
whose mouth was expanded very widely like a mountain cave
giri - śṛṅga
like a mountain peak
daṁṣṭraḥ
whose teeth
dhvāntāntar-āsyo vitatādhva-jihvaḥ
dhvānta - antaḥ - āsyaḥ
within whose mouth the atmosphere was as dark as possible
vitata - adhva - jihvaḥ
whose tongue was like a broad way
paruṣānila-śvāsa-davekṣaṇoṣṇaḥ
paruṣa - anila - śvāsa
whose breath was like a warm wind
dava - īkṣaṇa - uṣṇaḥ
and whose glance was like flames of fire .
Important Words
dharā-adhara-oṣṭhaḥ—lower lip on the earth
Compound: dharā (earth) + adhara (lower) + oṣṭha (lip). The demon's geometry literally spans the cosmography — earth to clouds. The whole verse is a deliberate cosmic anti-icon, contrasted later with Kṛṣṇa's universal form (chapter 14, when Brahmā sees Him as the source of all).
jalada-uttara-oṣṭhaḥ—upper lip touching the clouds
Compound: jalada (cloud) + uttara (upper) + oṣṭha (lip). Cloud-touching is normally a divine attribute (Viṣṇu's Trivikrama form). Aghāsura misappropriates the imagery — he is a fake virāṭ-rūpa.
dhvānta-antaḥ-āsyaḥ—the inside of his mouth was completely dark
Compound: dhvānta (darkness) + antaḥ (inside) + āsya (mouth). Inside the demon is tamas — the same tamas that demoniac nature lives in. Kṛṣṇa entering this darkness is the dīpa entering the well (Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's presence cancels tamas instantly).
dava-īkṣaṇa-uṣṇaḥ—with eyes burning like a forest-fire
Compound: dava (forest fire) + īkṣaṇa (gaze) + uṣṇa (hot). The forest-fire image will return in chapter 19 when Kṛṣṇa actually swallows a literal dāvāgni. Foreshadowing: the demon's fire is theatrical, Kṛṣṇa's appetite for fire is real.
His lower lip rested on the surface of the earth, and his upper lip was touching the clouds in the sky. The borders of his mouth resembled the sides of a big cave in a mountain, and the middle of his mouth was as dark as possible. His tongue resembled a broad traffic-way, his breath was like a warm wind, and his eyes blazed like fire.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
His lower lip rested on the surface of the earth, and his upper lip was touching the clouds in the sky. The borders of his mouth resembled the sides of a big cave in a mountain, and the middle of his mouth was as dark as possible. His tongue resembled a broad traffic-way, his breath was like a warm wind, and his eyes blazed like fire.
Commentary
His lower lip touched the earth and his upper lip reached the clouds. The front of the mouth was like two mountain caves. The interior of the mouth was dark, and the tongue was like a wide road. His breath was like burning fire and his gaze was like a forest fire.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Instead of paruṣa sometimes parṣa is seen. He had hot nostrils breathing harsh wind and hot eyes blazing like fire. Or he was hot because of his harsh breath and fiery eyes.
Picture a mouth so vast that the lower lip drags in the soil and the upper lip combs the clouds — eyes that burn like a forest fire, tongue stretched as a road. This is not just a big snake; it is the parody of a world. Aghāsura has tried to become a cosmos that swallows; in chapter 14 Kṛṣṇa will show Brahmā the real cosmos He contains.
dṛṣṭvā—seeingtam—that Aghāsuratādṛśam—in that posturesarve—Kṛṣṇa and all the cowherd boysmatvā—thought itvṛndāvana - śriyam—a beautiful statue of Vṛndāvanavyātta—spreadajagara - tuṇḍena—with the form of a python’s mouthhi—indeedutprekṣante—as if observingsma—in the pastlīlayā—as a matter of pastimes .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛṣṭvā taṁ tādṛśaṁ sarve
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
tam
that Aghāsura
tādṛśam
in that posture
sarve
Kṛṣṇa and all the cowherd boys
matvā vṛndāvana-śriyam
matvā
thought it
vṛndāvana - śriyam
a beautiful statue of Vṛndāvana
vyāttājagara-tuṇḍena
vyātta
spread
ajagara - tuṇḍena
with the form of a python’s mouth
hi
indeed
hy utprekṣante sma līlayā
utprekṣante
as if observing
sma
in the past
līlayā
as a matter of pastimes .
Important Words
vṛndāvana-śriyam—the beauty of Vṛndāvana
Compound: Vṛndāvana + śrī (beauty, splendor). The boys mistake the demon for vana-śobhā — they read everything in Vraja as beautiful. Gauḍīyas: this is the rasika eye, the antithesis of Aghāsura's envious one.
ajagara-tuṇḍena—by a python's mouth
Compound: ajagara (python) + tuṇḍa (snout, beak, mouth). Even when they correctly read the form, they treat it as art — a model python — not a threat. Sakhya-rasa has no fear because its support is Kṛṣṇa.
utprekṣante—they imagine, they fancifully suppose
From ut + prekṣ- (to look up, imagine). The technical term for poetic fancy. Śuka tells us the boys are doing poetry as they walk into the demon's mouth — the entire līlā runs at the level of alaṅkāra.
līlayā—as play
From līl- (to play). Everything in Vraja is līlā. The boys treat the demon as part of their game — and from Kṛṣṇa's perspective, that is exactly what it is.
Upon seeing this demon’s wonderful form, which resembled a great python, the boys thought that it must be a beautiful scenic spot of Vṛndāvana. Thereafter, they imagined it to be similar to the mouth of a great python. In other words, the boys, unafraid, thought that it was a statue made in the shape of a great python for the enjoyment of their pastimes.
Purport
Some of the boys, upon seeing this wonderful phenomenon, thought that it was in fact a python, and they were fleeing from the spot. But others said, “Why are you fleeing? It is not possible that a python like this is staying here. This is a spot of beauty for sporting.” This is what they imagined.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Upon seeing this demon's wonderful form, which resembled a great python, the boys thought that it must be a beautiful scenic spot of Vṛndāvana. Thereafter, they imagined it to be similar to the mouth of a great python. In other words, the boys, unafraid, thought that it was a statue made in the shape of a great python for the enjoyment of their pastimes.
Commentary
Some of the boys on seeing Aghasura started to run away, thinking it was a big snake. Other boys however considered that Aghasura was one of the wonders of Vrndavana. They comforted their fearful friends by saying, "Oh fools, a snake can never be this big. It is something created by the Lord out of clay so that we can appreciate the splendor of Vrndavana even more. He has made it in the form of a huge snake with a big gaping snout." In this way they thought of the Lord’s creation as something like the gaping mouth of the serpent (upreksyanta), without fear (lilaya).
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The word hi indicates certainty. They compared it to snake as a jest.
Picture children walking into what they think is a stage-prop cave at a temple festival — painted lips, painted teeth, all part of the décor. Their unawareness is not stupidity; it is the structural sweetness of Vraja, where nothing can actually harm them and everything is interpreted as Kṛṣṇa's play. The cowherd boys' fearlessness is the proof of where they are.
aho—ohmitrāṇi—friendsgadata—just let us knowsattva - kūṭam—dead pythonpuraḥ sthitam—as it is just before us allasmat—all of ussaṅgrasana—to devour us altogethervyātta - vyāla - tuṇḍā - yate—the python has spread its mouthna vā—whether it is a fact or not .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho mitrāṇi gadata
aho
oh
mitrāṇi
friends
gadata
just let us know
sattva-kūṭaṁ puraḥ sthitam
sattva - kūṭam
dead python
puraḥ sthitam
as it is just before us all
asmat-saṅgrasana-vyātta-
asmat
all of us
saṅgrasana
to devour us altogether
vyātta - vyāla - tuṇḍā - yate
the python has spread its mouth
vyāla-tuṇḍāyate na vā
na vā
whether it is a fact or not .
Important Words
mitrāṇi—O friends
Vocative plural of mitra (friend). The keynote address of sakhya-rasa. The boys speak to each other as friends, with Kṛṣṇa among them as one of the mitras — not as Lord-and-servant in this moment, but as peer-among-peers.
sattva-kūṭam—a living creature in disguise
Compound: sattva (living being) + kūṭa (cheat, deception). 'A creature pretending to be a hill.' The boys correctly diagnose: this is a creature disguised. The Gauḍīya lesson — māyā always wears scenery.
saṅgrasana—to devour all of us together
From sam + gras- (to swallow whole). The boys see the threat clearly and walk in anyway. Not naïve confidence — confidence in Kṛṣṇa, even when they cannot name what it is they are confident in.
The boys said: Dear friends, is this creature dead, or is it actually a living python with its mouth spread wide just to swallow us all? Kindly clear up this doubt.
Purport
The friends began to discuss among themselves the reality of the wonderful creature laying before them. Was it dead, or was it actually a living python trying to swallow them up?
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
The boys said: Dear friends, is this creature dead, or is it actually a living python with its mouth spread wide just to swallow us all? Kindly clear up this doubt.
Commentary
Some called out to the chief boys to confirm their thoughts. "Is this some type of immovable living entity?" Kuta means a peak, indicating some large animal. "Is it some peaceful tiger or other big animal, who has his mouth open as if to devour us?"
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Please tell us whether this is some immobile creature (sattva-kūṭam) in front of us, whose front part is in the form of a snake’s mouth gaping in order to devour us.
His Holiness Prahladananada Swami· 2024-01-13· Slovenian
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Imagine children debating whether a sleeping crocodile on the riverbank is real — leaning in, poking, comparing notes. The danger they are debating is fatal; their composure is total. This is what living in Kṛṣṇa's company does: it removes the existential weight from what would otherwise terrify.
satyam—now the boys decided that it was in fact a living pythonarka - kara - āraktam—appearing like the sunshineuttarā - hanuvat ghanam—on the cloud resembling the upper lipsadharā - hanuvat—resembling the lower lipsrodhaḥ—big banktat - praticchāyayā—by the reflection of sunshinearuṇam—reddish .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satyam arka-karāraktam
satyam
now the boys decided that it was in fact a living python
arka - kara - āraktam
appearing like the sunshine
uttarā-hanuvad ghanam
uttarā - hanuvat ghanam
on the cloud resembling the upper lips
adharā - hanuvat
resembling the lower lips
adharā-hanuvad rodhas
rodhaḥ
big bank
tat-praticchāyayāruṇam
tat - praticchāyayā
by the reflection of sunshine
aruṇam
reddish .
Important Words
arka-kara-āraktam—reddened by the sun's rays
Compound: arka (sun) + kara (ray) + ārakta (reddened). The upper lip is sun-touched cloud-color. Bhāgavatam's nature-imagery is precise: pinks, reds, the colors of dawn — all the colors of Vraja's sky are catalogued in the demon's body too.
uttarā-hanuvat—like the upper jaw
Compound: uttara (upper) + hanu (jaw) + vat (like). Anatomical precision plus simile-suffix. The boys, even in their playful interpretation, see clearly — Vraja-rasa is not blurry; it is poetic comparison.
adharā-hanuvat—like the lower jaw
Compound: adhara (lower) + hanu (jaw) + vat (like). The pair uttarā/adharā creates a verse-internal symmetry — sky-and-shadow, upper-and-lower. Aghāsura is symmetrically described because Kṛṣṇa's līlā has aesthetic structure even in its parodies.
tat-praticchāyayā—by its reflection
Compound: tat (that) + praticchāyā (reflection). The 'reflection' of the cloud — a doubled image. Gauḍīyas note the recurrence of pratibhāsa / praticchāyā imagery in Bhāgavatam: māyā is always a reflection of the real.
Thereafter they decided: Dear friends, this is certainly an animal sitting here to swallow us all. Its upper lip resembles a cloud reddened by the sunshine, and its lower lip resembles the reddish shadows of a cloud.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter they decided: Dear friends, this is certainly an animal sitting here to swallow us all. Its upper lip resembles a cloud reddened by the sunshine, and its lower lip resembles the reddish shadows of a cloud.
Commentary
One boy agreed with them. "" The cloud reddened by the sun seems to be his upper lip, and its reflection reddening the ground seems to be his lower lip." Hanu here means lip or jaw rather than chin since there is no upper and lower chin.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The mountain slope made red by the reflection from the cloud is like its lower lip.
Some boys asked the question in the previous verse. Other boys answer in four verses, agreeing with them. You speak the truth (satyam). It is red with the sunlight. This indicates that the boys were going west, and the demon was facing east. Thus the morning light lit up the snake. Uttarā in the feminine instead of masculine is poetic license.
Picture children matching cloud-colors to a creature's lips — pink and red, sun and shadow. Their analysis is correct in every detail; only the conclusion they should draw, they will not. Vraja teaches: accurate perception of danger is compatible with absolute fearlessness, when Kṛṣṇa is the company.
pratispardhete—just resemblingsṛkkabhyām—with the corners of the mouthsavya - asavye—left and rightnaga - udare—caves of a mountaintuṅga - śṛṅga - ālayaḥ—the high mountain peaksapi—although it is soetāḥ tat - daṁṣṭrābhiḥ—they resemble the teeth of the animalca—andpaśyata—just see .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pratispardhete sṛkkabhyāṁ
pratispardhete
just resembling
sṛkkabhyām
with the corners of the mouth
savyāsavye nagodare
savya - asavye
left and right
naga - udare
caves of a mountain
tuṅga-śṛṅgālayo ’py etās
tuṅga - śṛṅga - ālayaḥ
the high mountain peaks
tad-daṁṣṭrābhiś ca paśyata
api
although it is so
etāḥ tat - daṁṣṭrābhiḥ
they resemble the teeth of the animal
ca
and
paśyata
just see .
Important Words
naga-udare—in the belly of a mountain
Compound: naga (mountain) + udara (belly). The boys read the demon's body as cave-geography — mountain bellies, mountain peaks. The poet is laying down imagery that will be inverted in chapter 25 when Kṛṣṇa lifts an actual mountain.
tuṅga-śṛṅga-ālayaḥ—abode of high peaks
Compound: tuṅga (lofty) + śṛṅga (peak) + ālaya (abode). 'Dwelling-place of high peaks' for what are actually fangs. Gauḍīya āyurvedic note: daṁṣṭra (fang) carries venom — but here the boys see only architecture.
tat-daṁṣṭrābhiḥ—by his fangs
Compound: tat (its) + daṁṣṭra (fang). The same word used in BG 11.27 when Arjuna sees the warriors crushed in the Lord's terrifying universal form. Here the daṁṣṭras are the demon's — and they will be the ones that fail.
On the left and right, the two depressions resembling mountain caves are the corners of its mouth, and the high mountain peaks are its teeth.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
On the left and right, the two depressions resembling mountain caves are the corners of its mouth, and the high mountain peaks are its teeth.
Commentary
"Look here, these two caves (etah) appear to be like the front part of a mouth. And these mountains (pointing with his forefinger) (etah) appear like a serpent’s teeth."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Those groups of high mountain peaks which are right in front of us (etāḥ) compete with a snake’s teeth.
Related values & verses
Concepts
Jiva
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture children pointing at a row of stalactites: 'Look, peaks of a mountain!' — except the peaks are teeth and the cave is a throat. Their cheerfulness in catalog-mode is itself a protective force. In Vraja, observing the danger calmly turns out to be safer than fleeing it.
āstṛta - āyāma—the length and breadthmārgaḥ ayam—a broad wayrasanām—the tonguepratigarjati—resembleseṣām antaḥ - gatam—on the inside of the mountainsdhvāntam—darknessetat—thisapi—indeedantaḥ - ānanam—the inside of the mouth .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āstṛtāyāma-mārgo ’yaṁ
āstṛta - āyāma
the length and breadth
mārgaḥ ayam
a broad way
rasanāṁ pratigarjati
rasanām
the tongue
pratigarjati
resembles
eṣāṁ antar-gataṁ dhvāntam
eṣām antaḥ - gatam
on the inside of the mountains
dhvāntam
darkness
etad apy antar-ānanam
etat
this
api
indeed
antaḥ - ānanam
the inside of the mouth .
Important Words
āstṛta-āyāma—broad and extended
Compound: āstṛta (spread out) + āyāma (length). The tongue is described as if it were architecture — a paved road. Bhāgavatam's interest in built scale recurs throughout (Hari's universal form, the demon's body, the Govardhana hill).
rasanām—his tongue
Tongue, but also taste (rasa). A pun — the demon's rasanā is part of how he plans to taste the boys; their rasa is to laugh and walk in. Same word, opposite directions.
antaḥ-gatam—gone inside
Compound: antaḥ (inside) + gata (gone). 'What has gone inside' — they are speaking already from inside the mouth. The verb form puts them in the demon's interior even as they discuss its anatomy.
antaḥ-ānanam—the inside of his mouth
Compound: antaḥ (inside) + ānana (mouth). 'Inside-mouth' as a single concept — the cavity. Where the Aghāsura-līlā literally takes place; chapter 14 will reveal a deeper antar-ānana (the universal form inside Kṛṣṇa's mouth).
In length and breadth the animal’s tongue resembles a broad traffic-way, and the inside of its mouth is very, very dark, like a cave in a mountain.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
In length and breadth the animal's tongue resembles a broad traffic-way, and the inside of its mouth is very, very dark, like a cave in a mountain.
Commentary
"This wide (astrtayamah) road is like a tongue (rasana). The darkness between the mountain peaks (esam) is like the opening of his mouth."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The long, wide (āsṛta) road resembles a tongue. The shadows of the cave are compared to the inside of a snake’s mouth because both were black.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
In Vṛndāvana, because of unlimited cows wandering about, it appeared there was a wide road naturally everywhere.
Related values & verses
Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Prema (Divine Love)
Concepts
RasaJiva
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a public square paved smooth so that footsteps echo — and the boys hear their own voices coming back to them inside the demon's mouth. The echo is the warning; their interpretation is 'oh, the road is paved.' Vraja's reading is consistently the rasika reading: every threat is geography, every roar is hospitality.
dāva - uṣṇa - khara - vātaḥ ayam—hot breath coming out exactly like fireśvāsa - vat bhāti paśyata—just see how it resembles his breathtat - dagdha - sattva—of burning corpsesdurgandhaḥ—the bad smellapi—indeedantaḥ - āmiṣa - gandha - vat—is like the fleshy smell coming out from within .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dāvoṣṇa-khara-vāto ’yaṁ
dāva - uṣṇa - khara - vātaḥ ayam
hot breath coming out exactly like fire
śvāsavad bhāti paśyata
śvāsa - vat bhāti paśyata
just see how it resembles his breath
tat - dagdha - sattva
of burning corpses
tad-dagdha-sattva-durgandho
durgandhaḥ
the bad smell
api
indeed
’py antar-āmiṣa-gandhavat
antaḥ - āmiṣa - gandha - vat
is like the fleshy smell coming out from within .
Important Words
dāva-uṣṇa-khara-vātaḥ—a hot, harsh wind like a forest fire
Compound: dāva (forest fire) + uṣṇa (hot) + khara (harsh) + vāta (wind). Four-stem compound — Bhāgavatam's poetic density. The image of dāvāgni recurs across Canto 10: chapter 17, chapter 19. Vraja survives every fire because Kṛṣṇa contains it.
tat-dagdha-sattva—the beings he has burned/eaten
Compound: tat (his) + dagdha (burned) + sattva (creature). The bodies inside him are 'burned beings.' Gauḍīyas note: souls eaten by Aghāsura cease being mere food when Kṛṣṇa enters — chapter 38 confirms even the demon himself attains sārūpya.
durgandhaḥ—bad smell
Compound: dur (bad) + gandha (smell). The boys observe the foul smell and identify it correctly. In Vraja, even noticing the rotten is part of the rasa — the children are precise observers, not idealists.
The hot fiery wind is the breath coming out of his mouth, which is giving off the bad smell of burning flesh because of all the dead bodies he has eaten.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
The hot fiery wind is the breath coming out of his mouth, which is giving off the bad smell of burning flesh because of all the dead bodies he has eaten.
Commentary
"The smell of animals burned in the forest fire seems to be like the smell of flesh digesting in a snake’s stomach."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
They speak in astonishment. Look! The hot wind resembles a snake’s breathing.
Imagine children noticing that a cave smells of cooked flesh and remarking calmly, 'must be old kills.' Their composure is not bravado — it is the natural fearlessness of those who have never been alone. The hot wind of Aghāsura's breath is the smell of every soul he has eaten; the boys walk through it as through a kitchen fire that cannot burn them.
asmān—all of uskim—whetheratra—heregrasitā—will swallowniviṣṭān—who have attempted to enterayam—this animaltathā—socet—ifbaka - vat—like Bakāsuravinaṅkṣyati—he will be vanquishedkṣaṇāt—immediatelyanena—by this Kṛṣṇaiti—in this waybaka - ari - uśat - mukham—the beautiful face of Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of Bakāsuravīkṣya—observing, looking atuddhasantaḥ—loudly laughingkara - tāḍanaiḥ—with clapping of handsyayuḥ—entered the mouth .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
asmān kim atra grasitā niviṣṭān
asmān
all of us
kim
whether
atra
here
grasitā
will swallow
niviṣṭān
who have attempted to enter
ayaṁ tathā ced bakavad vinaṅkṣyati
ayam
this animal
tathā
so
cet
if
baka - vat
like Bakāsura
vinaṅkṣyati
he will be vanquished
kṣaṇād aneneti bakāry-uśan-mukhaṁ
kṣaṇāt
immediately
anena
by this Kṛṣṇa
iti
in this way
baka - ari - uśat - mukham
the beautiful face of Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of Bakāsura
vīkṣyoddhasantaḥ kara-tāḍanair yayuḥ
vīkṣya
observing, looking at
uddhasantaḥ
loudly laughing
kara - tāḍanaiḥ
with clapping of hands
yayuḥ
entered the mouth .
Important Words
baka-vat—like Baka
baka (heron-demon) + -vat (like). The boys explicitly compare Aghāsura to Bakāsura of chapter 11. Gauḍīyas: the cowherd boys have already metabolized Kṛṣṇa's previous līlās — Vraja's children are also Bhāgavatam-students.
baka-ari-uśat-mukham—the beautiful face of the enemy of Baka
Compound: baka (heron-demon) + ari (enemy) + uśat (beautiful) + mukha (face). Kṛṣṇa is named here by His relation to the previous demon — 'Baka-enemy.' Each pastime adds a name; Kṛṣṇa's name-store grows by demon-defeat.
uddhasantaḥ—laughing loudly
ud + has- (to laugh out). The boys laugh as they enter the demon's mouth. Gauḍīyas read this as the perfect sakhya-fearlessness: the joke is on the demon, not on them.
kara-tāḍanaiḥ—by clapping hands
Compound: kara (hand) + tāḍana (striking). Hand-clapping — the universal child's signal for game-on. The cowherd boys are playing kabaddi with a python; the rules are their own.
Then the boys said, “Has this living creature come to swallow us? If he does so, he will immediately be killed like Bakāsura, without delay.” Thus they looked at the beautiful face of Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of Bakāsura, and, laughing loudly and clapping their hands, they entered the mouth of the python.
Purport
After talking about the terrible animal this way and that way, they decided to enter the demon’s mouth. They had full faith in Kṛṣṇa because they had experienced how Kṛṣṇa had saved them from the mouth of Bakāsura. Now, here was another asura, Aghāsura. Therefore, they wanted to enjoy the sport of entering the demon’s mouth and being saved by Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of Bakāsura.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Then the boys said, "Has this living creature come to swallow us? If he does so, he will immediately be killed like Bakāsura, without delay." Thus they looked at the beautiful face of Kṛṣṇa, the enemy of Bakāsura, and, laughing loudly and clapping their hands, they entered the mouth of the python.
Commentary
Together they spoke with a little fear. "This thing, if this is really a snake, and we enter his mouth, will he swallow us up?" Someone then answered to calm them down. "If it is so, then in an instant (ksanena) he will be killed as Baka was killed by Krsna (anena)." Saying this he smiled while looking at Krsna, who was standing some distance away. "Krsna is within our glance, so what have we to worry?" Getting this answer, they all began to laugh loudly and said, "Friends, we must find out what is in that mouth." Then they entered the mouth out of boyish curiosity. They ran in, clapping their hands, to show their fearlessness and courage, or to dismiss the snake. The calves also raising their tails ran after them inside the snake’s mouth.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Saying this, they laughed loudly on making analogies with a snake. Or they looked at Kṛṣṇa’s face and laughed loudly. Or they laughed to show that what they said was a joke, saying “You should be careful here.” To show courage and pride along with fearlessness, as if driving away a snake, they ran forward.
Picture children walking into a tiger's open mouth while pointing at a friend and saying, 'If it tries anything, he'll handle it.' That friend is Kṛṣṇa. Their entire calculation rests on Him; they do not even need to articulate it. Sakhya-rasa is the rasa in which faith does not look like faith — it looks like assumption.
Stories
Bakāsura swallowed and split
Just one chapter earlier (SB 10.11), Bakāsura — Aghāsura's elder brother — appeared as a giant heron and swallowed Kṛṣṇa whole. Kṛṣṇa heated Himself inside the heron's throat until the demon released Him; then He grabbed the beak and tore the demon in two.
The boys remember this. When verse 24 says 'he will be killed like Bakāsura,' they are not speculating — they are citing yesterday's precedent. Sakhya-rasa has memory; Kṛṣṇa's exploits are oral tradition among His friends.
ittham—in this waymithaḥ—or anotheratathyam—a subject matter that is not a facta - tat - jña—without knowledgebhāṣitam—while they were talkingśrutvā—Kṛṣṇa hearing themvicintya—thinkingiti—thusamṛṣā—actually, trulymṛṣāyate—who is trying to appear as a false thing (actually the animal was Aghāsura, but because of poor knowledge they were thinking him to be a dead python)rakṣaḥ—(Kṛṣṇa, however, could understand that) he was a demonviditvā—knowing itakhila - bhūta - hṛt - sthitaḥ—because He is antaryāmī, situated everywhere, in the core of everyone’s heartsvānām—of His own associatesniroddhum—just to forbid thembhagavān—the Supreme Personality of Godheadmanaḥ dadhe—made up His mind .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
itthaṁ mitho ’tathyam ataj-jña-bhāṣitaṁ
ittham
in this way
mithaḥ
or another
atathyam
a subject matter that is not a fact
a - tat - jña
without knowledge
bhāṣitam
while they were talking
śrutvā vicintyety amṛṣā mṛṣāyate
śrutvā
Kṛṣṇa hearing them
vicintya
thinking
rakṣo viditvākhila-bhūta-hṛt-sthitaḥ
iti
thus
svānāṁ niroddhuṁ bhagavān mano dadhe
amṛṣā
actually, truly
mṛṣāyate
who is trying to appear as a false thing (actually the animal was Aghāsura, but because of poor knowledge they were thinking him to be a dead python)
rakṣaḥ
(Kṛṣṇa, however, could understand that) he was a demon
viditvā
knowing it
akhila - bhūta - hṛt - sthitaḥ
because He is antaryāmī, situated everywhere, in the core of everyone’s heart
svānām
of His own associates
niroddhum
just to forbid them
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
manaḥ dadhe
made up His mind .
Important Words
akhila-bhūta-hṛt-sthitaḥ—situated in the heart of all beings
Compound: akhila (all) + bhūta (being) + hṛt (heart) + sthita (situated). The technical Paramātmā-vāda formulation. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa is simultaneously the boy walking among them AND the antaryāmī inside everyone — acintya-bhedābheda live in one verse.
svānām—of His own
From sva (one's own). The cowherd boys are sva — Kṛṣṇa's own. Possessive in the rasa-sense: relationship of belonging. Gauḍīyas insist on this — devotees are not 'others' to Kṛṣṇa but svajana, His own people.
niroddhum—to stop
From ni + rudh- (to restrain). Kṛṣṇa wants to restrain His friends — protective instinct. Significantly, the verse ends with niroddhum manaḥ dadhe ('He set His mind to restrain'); but in verse 26 they enter anyway, faster than His thought.
bhagavān—the Supreme Personality of Godhead
The technical full title. Inserted at the moment Kṛṣṇa decides to act as Lord, not just as friend. Gauḍīyas distinguish bhagavattā (His Lordship) and mādhurya (His sweetness); both are in Him simultaneously, and Bhāgavatam toggles vocabulary as the situation requires.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is situated as antaryāmī, the Supersoul, in the core of everyone’s heart, heard the boys talking among themselves about the artificial python. Unknown to them, it was actually Aghāsura, a demon who had appeared as a python. Kṛṣṇa, knowing this, wanted to forbid His associates to enter the demon’s mouth.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is situated as antaryāmī, the Supersoul, in the core of everyone's heart, heard the boys talking among themselves about the artificial python. Unknown to them, it was actually Aghāsura, a demon who had appeared as a python. Kṛṣṇa, knowing this, wanted to forbid His associates to enter the demon's mouth.
Commentary
Hearing the boys discuss about the real snake as if it were something else Krsna began to think. "What is really a snake’s mouth they are thinking is some scenic part of Vrndavan, not a snake’s mouth. This is not just a snake, but the demon called Aghasura. " How did he know this? Because he is situated in everyone’s heart (akhila bhuta hrt sthitah) as paramatma, knowing everything. He then decided to prevent them (svanam) from entering.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Hearing the speech of his friends, who were acting like ignorant people, hearing that speech which was false, since truly (amṛṣā) the gaping mouth of the snake shone with brilliance (mṛṣāyate) in Vṛndāvana, and knowing it was not only a python but the Rākṣasa named Agha, since he was in everyone’s heart as Paramātmā, was the inspiration for all things and was endowed with all powers (bhagavān), he wanted to prevent them.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-08· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a father who hears his children, several rooms away, discussing whether the trapdoor is real — and rises to intervene. Kṛṣṇa as antaryāmī is not far in the heart; He is the listener of every word, including the ones spoken by His friends about a danger they cannot see clearly. The verse marks the moment Vraja-līlā tips: until now Kṛṣṇa was a peer, here He is also the Lord considering His own role.
tāvat—in the meantimepraviṣṭāḥ—all enteredtu—indeedasura - udara - antaram—within the belly of the great demonparam—butna gīrṇāḥ—they were not swallowedśiśavaḥ—all the boyssa - vatsāḥ—along with their calvespratīkṣamāṇena—who was just waiting forbaka - ari—of the enemy of Bakāsuraveśanam—the enteringhata - sva - kānta - smaraṇena—the asura was thinking of his own dead relatives, who would not be satisfied unless Kṛṣṇa were deadrakṣasā—by the demon .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāvat praviṣṭās tv asurodarāntaraṁ
tāvat
in the meantime
praviṣṭāḥ
all entered
tu
indeed
asura - udara - antaram
within the belly of the great demon
paraṁ na gīrṇāḥ śiśavaḥ sa-vatsāḥ
param
but
na gīrṇāḥ
they were not swallowed
śiśavaḥ
all the boys
sa - vatsāḥ
along with their calves
pratīkṣamāṇena bakāri-veśanaṁ
pratīkṣamāṇena
who was just waiting for
baka - ari
of the enemy of Bakāsura
veśanam
the entering
hata-sva-kānta-smaraṇena rakṣasā
hata - sva - kānta - smaraṇena
the asura was thinking of his own dead relatives, who would not be satisfied unless Kṛṣṇa were dead
rakṣasā
by the demon .
Important Words
asura-udara-antaram—into the belly of the demon
Compound: asura (demon) + udara (belly) + antara (inside). The same udara-interior that the universal form contains all worlds in (chapter 14) here contains the cowherd boys. The līlā creates a deliberate inversion: in the demon's belly there is loss; in Kṛṣṇa's belly there is everything.
śiśavaḥ—the children
Plural of śiśu (child). Gauḍīyas read śiśu as the keyword of kaumāra-līlā — Kṛṣṇa as śiśu is the form Yaśodā holds, the gopas play with. Mādhurya-rasa belongs to later years; here we are still in śiśu-rasa, where vātsalya and sakhya predominate.
baka-ari—the enemy of Baka (i.e. Kṛṣṇa)
Compound: baka + ari (enemy). The demon's own internal monologue names Kṛṣṇa by His Baka-killer title. Even Aghāsura's mind is full of Kṛṣṇa's exploits — Vraja's enemies are devotional by inversion.
hata-sva-kānta-smaraṇena—by remembrance of his slain kin
Compound: hata (slain) + sva (own) + kānta (dear one) + smaraṇa (remembrance). The demon's smaraṇa is grief-driven memory of his siblings. Gauḍīyas note: smaraṇa is a limb of bhakti (śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇam); the demon's smaraṇa, though hostile, still keeps Kṛṣṇa in mind — which is why even hostile thought leads to liberation (verse 39).
In the meantime, while Kṛṣṇa was considering how to stop them, all the cowherd boys entered the mouth of the demon. The demon, however, did not swallow them, for he was thinking of his own relatives who had been killed by Kṛṣṇa and was just waiting for Kṛṣṇa to enter his mouth.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
In the meantime, while Kṛṣṇa was considering how to stop them, all the cowherd boys entered the mouth of the demon. The demon, however, did not swallow them, for he was thinking of his own relatives who had been killed by Kṛṣṇa and was just waiting for Kṛṣṇa to enter his mouth.
Commentary
Just as Krsna decided to stop them, the boys entered the serpent’s mouth, but the serpent did not swallow them. Why didn’t he swallow them? Remembering the death of his brother and sister (hata svaka antasmaranena) he was waiting for Krsna. To think that though Krsna wanted to stop the boys from entering he could not do it, and that his satyasankalpa sakti(every desire of the Lord is fulfilled) was thwarted, is incorrect. The devotees had the desire , " If we go in the serpent’s mouth, will he swallow us? If he swallows us, our friend will kill him as he did Baka." Of the two desires, the desire of the devotee prevails, as it was explained previously, by the principle that the Lord is controlled by his devotee. This is all arranged by the ever- watchful lila sakti of the Lord, which destroys all contradictions.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Just as he decided to stop them, the boys along with the calves entered the snake’s mouth. This incident, like Kṛṣṇa’s external pastimes of killing demons, takes place because his dear devotees were absorbed in prema-rasa. This is the real conclusion as with previous incidents. Otherwise this could not happen, since Kṛṣṇa’s every wish is fulfilled (satya-saṅkalpa) and he is the very form of all knowledge. The calves entered because the boys followed after them, clapping their hands and making them run, since otherwise they would have fled away in fear. The boys with the calves went into the stomach of Agha, though they did not at all want to enter, since it frightfully dark and full of fire. Though they were unlimited in number, by the influence of the līlā-śakti, they could all fit inside. Agha did not prevent them from leaving by closing his mouth and swallowing (gīrṇāḥ). Another version has na jīrṇāḥ: he did not want to digest them. The meaning becomes the same since closing the mouth and stretching the body are aids to digesting food.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Just as he decided to stop them, the boys along with the calves entered the snake’s mouth. This incident, like Kṛṣṇa’s external pastimes of killing demons, takes place because his dear devotees were absorbed in prema-rasa. This is the real conclusion as with previous incidents. Otherwise this could not happen, since Kṛṣṇa’s every wish is fulfilled (satya-saṅkalpa) and he is the very form of all knowledge.
One should not say that that his external actions, which are for the benefit of the world can be understood and the internal actions, of he who is deeper than an million oceans, cannot be understood, for he has nothing to hide from his dear devotees.
Ullaṅghita-trividha-sīma-samātiśāyi saṁbhāvanaṁ tava parivraḍima-svabhāvam
Māyā-balena bhavatāpi niguhymānaṁ paśyanti kecid aniśaṁ tvad ananya-bhāvāḥ
O Lord who surpasses three types of limitations! Some persons, having pure devotion to you, constantly see your fame and generous nature, though it is hidden by you by the power of your māyā.
Stotra-ratna, Yamunācārya
If Kṛṣṇa’s thoughts were beyond comprehension, Śukadeva would not be able to describe his thinking in verse 25 (vicintya).
Or while Kṛṣṇa decided to prevent the boys from entering, before that (tāvat) before his desire, they entered. Or hearing the talk of the boys (svānām) he decided to kill (nirodhum) the demon (rakṣaḥ). This resolves the issue. The demon did not close his mouth and swallow the boys. He was waiting for Kṛṣṇa.
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Satya (Truthfulness)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Picture a host waiting for one specific guest to arrive before serving — refusing to swallow the friends because the real prize is the boy at their center. Aghāsura's restraint is itself his miscalculation: he could have taken what he had; instead he held out for what he could not have.
tān—all those boysvīkṣya—seeingkṛṣṇaḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇasakala - abhaya - pradaḥ—who is the source of fearlessness for everyonehi—indeedananya - nāthān—especially for the cowherd boys, who did not know anyone except Kṛṣṇasva - karāt—from the control of His handavacyutān—now gone outdīnān ca—helplessmṛtyoḥ jaṭhara - agni - ghāsān—who had all entered like straws into the fire of the abdomen of Aghāsura, who was very bold and hungry, like death personified (because the asura had assumed a big body, he must have had a very strong appetite)ghṛṇā - arditaḥ—therefore, being compassionate due to causeless mercydiṣṭa - kṛtena—by things arranged by His internal potencyvismitaḥ—He also, for the time being, was astonished .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tān vīkṣya kṛṣṇaḥ sakalābhaya-prado
tān
all those boys
vīkṣya
seeing
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa
sakala - abhaya - pradaḥ
who is the source of fearlessness for everyone
hi
indeed
hy ananya-nāthān sva-karād avacyutān
ananya - nāthān
especially for the cowherd boys, who did not know anyone except Kṛṣṇa
sva - karāt
from the control of His hand
avacyutān
now gone out
dīnāṁś ca mṛtyor jaṭharāgni-ghāsān
dīnān ca
helpless
mṛtyoḥ jaṭhara - agni - ghāsān
who had all entered like straws into the fire of the abdomen of Aghāsura, who was very bold and hungry, like death personified (because the asura had assumed a big body, he must have had a very strong appetite)
ghṛṇā - arditaḥ
therefore, being compassionate due to causeless mercy
ghṛṇārdito diṣṭa-kṛtena vismitaḥ
diṣṭa - kṛtena
by things arranged by His internal potency
vismitaḥ
He also, for the time being, was astonished .
Important Words
sakala-abhaya-pradaḥ—the giver of all fearlessness
Compound: sakala (all) + abhaya (fearlessness) + prada (giver). Kṛṣṇa's standing title — abhaya-mudrā Lord. Gauḍīyas: His very nature is to remove fear, even when momentarily He shows the appearance of considering. The title in this verse is the answer to the verse's question.
ananya-nāthān—having no other Lord
Compound: ananya (no other) + nātha (Lord). The boys recognize no Lord but Kṛṣṇa. This is the technical definition of pure bhakti — ananya-bhakti, exclusive devotion. Gauḍīyas (Rūpa Gosvāmī, Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.1.11) make this exclusivity the very mark of uttamā bhakti.
sva-karāt avacyutān—slipped from His own hand
Compound: sva (own) + kara (hand) + avacyuta (fallen, slipped). The friends have slipped from His grasp — a maximally tender image. Even the Lord's hand can momentarily not hold what walks past it; this is the līlā's pretense of vulnerability.
diṣṭa-kṛtena—as if arranged by providence
Compound: diṣṭa (destined) + kṛta (done). 'As if done by fate' — a curious phrase, since Kṛṣṇa is fate. Gauḍīyas read this as Bhagavān playing inside His own internal energy (yoga-māyā), letting the situation unfold.
Kṛṣṇa saw that all the cowherd boys, who did not know anyone but Him as their Lord, had now gone out of His hand and were helpless, having entered like straws into the fire of the abdomen of Aghāsura, who was death personified. It was intolerable for Kṛṣṇa to be separated from His friends the cowherd boys. Therefore, as if seeing that this had been arranged by His internal potency, Kṛṣṇa was momentarily struck with wonder and unsure of what to do.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa saw that all the cowherd boys, who did not know anyone but Him as their Lord, had now gone out of His hand and were helpless, having entered like straws into the fire of the abdomen of Aghāsura, who was death personified. It was intolerable for Kṛṣṇa to be separated from His friends the cowherd boys. Therefore, as if seeing that this had been arranged by His internal potency, Kṛṣṇa was momentarily struck with wonder and unsure of what to do.
Commentary
Seeing the boys escape from his hands like jewels and fall into the fire of the snake’s stomach like blades of grass, moved with compassion (ghrnaya arditah), Krsna was astonished at the actions of his lila sakti (dista krtena) or of time (dista) in having them enter the serpent’s mouth. What was the cause of astonishment? "It is not possible for these cowherd boys to have prarabdha karma and besides, the supersoul does not give them the tendency for karma. Because supersoul is my expansion, she does not do anything unfavorable to me. Therefore the lila sakti has made this seemingly unfavorable arrangement with a desire to put me, full of prema, into the compassionate mood (karuna rasa) on seeing this unfortunate situation. How astonishing is her control over me, the form of all rasas, the king of all lila ( lila purusottama)." Though the sorrow due to separation from his friends remained, with the rise of astonishment (vismaya bhava), it reduced a little. This is the meaning.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Kṛṣṇa who is the giver of fearlessness to the universe saw that the boys solely depending on him had gone far away from his hands which give fearlessness. They were now suffering since by dying they would be separated from him and were now like grass in the fire of digestion of Agha, who was death personified. He became astonished by the results given through prārabdha-karma (diṣta-kṛteṇa).
But actually this event occurred according to the mood of the Lord who is filled with pleasure by performing human-like pastimes. Diṣṭa means his appointed (diṣṭa) śakti which covers his pastimes when the Lord comes as avatāra. Or diṣṭa means a principal following his approval. Pāṇini 4.4.60 says asti nasty diṣṭaṁ matiḥ: the suffix ka is added to diṣṭa to indicate a believer in things based on proof. He was astonished by what had been done before his eyes (diṣṭa-kṛteṇa). He was amazed that in front of him, his dear friends had been swallowed up. Or vismitaḥ can mean that he lost his smile out of grief. “Even if Kṛṣṇa was filled with grief, how were the boys under control of karma?” His discrimination vanished because of being controlled by affection (gṛṇārditaḥ). His nature is to be most merciful. Or, though he was soft with compassion for them because they had no other shelter (ananya-nāthān), he understood that they had escaped from his hands and were about to die. Therefore he was astonished.
Picture a parent who turns for one moment and finds the children have all walked into the river — and the parent, who is also the river's master, stands stunned for an instant. Kṛṣṇa's pause is not weakness; it is the līlā's deliberate beat. The Supreme Person allows Himself to feel for a moment what every devotee has felt: that the beloved is in danger and the path forward is not yet clear.
కృత్యం కిమత్రాస్య ఖలస్య జీవనం
న వా అమీషాం చ సతాం విహింసనమ్ ।
ద్వయం కథం స్యాదితి సంవిచిన్త్య
జ్ఞాత్వావిశత్తుణ్డమశేషదృగ్ఘరి: ॥ ౨౮ ॥
kṛtyaṁ kim atrāsya khalasya jīvanaṁ
[krityam kim atraasya khalasya jeevanam]
na vā amīṣāṁ ca satāṁ vihiṁsanam
[na vaa ameeshaam cha sataam vihimsanam]
dvayaṁ kathaṁ syād iti saṁvicintya
[dvayam katham syaad iti samvichintya]
jñātvāviśat tuṇḍam aśeṣa-dṛg ghariḥ
[jnaatvaavishat tundam ashesha-drig gharih]
Word-for-word
kṛtyam kim—what to doatra—in this situationasya khalasya—of this envious demonjīvanam—the existence of lifena—there should not bevā—eitheramīṣām ca—and of those who are innocentsatām—of the devoteesvihiṁsanam—the deathdvayam—both actions (killing the demon and saving the boys)katham—howsyāt—can be possibleiti saṁvicintya—very perfectly thinking about the subject matterjñātvā—and deciding what to doaviśat—enteredtuṇḍam—within the mouth of the demonaśeṣa - dṛk hariḥ—Kṛṣṇa, who has unlimited potency, could understand past, future and present .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛtyaṁ kim atrāsya khalasya jīvanaṁ
kṛtyam kim
what to do
atra
in this situation
asya khalasya
of this envious demon
jīvanam
the existence of life
na vā amīṣāṁ ca satāṁ vihiṁsanam
na
there should not be
vā
either
amīṣām ca
and of those who are innocent
satām
of the devotees
vihiṁsanam
the death
dvayaṁ kathaṁ syād iti saṁvicintya
dvayam
both actions (killing the demon and saving the boys)
katham
how
syāt
can be possible
iti saṁvicintya
very perfectly thinking about the subject matter
jñātvāviśat tuṇḍam aśeṣa-dṛg ghariḥ
jñātvā
and deciding what to do
aviśat
entered
tuṇḍam
within the mouth of the demon
aśeṣa - dṛk hariḥ
Kṛṣṇa, who has unlimited potency, could understand past, future and present .
Important Words
kṛtyam—what is to be done
From kṛ- (to do). The technical word for required action — duty, the right next move. Kṛṣṇa is shown deliberating like a competent agent. Gauḍīyas read this as līlā-deliberation; the Lord 'considers' though He knows.
khalasya jīvanam—the life of the wicked one
Compound: khala (wicked) + jīvana (life). Aghāsura's death is named as the first half of the problem. Bhāgavatam is unflinching: killing a demon is a legitimate divine action.
satām vihiṁsanam—harm to the devotees
Compound: sat (devotee, truth-keeper) + vihiṁsana (harm). The second half. Kṛṣṇa names the protection of the devotees in the same breath as the killing of the demon — both are equally divine work.
aviśat tuṇḍam—He entered the mouth
Compound verb: aviśat (entered) + tuṇḍam (mouth). The pivot of the chapter. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's entering the mouth of His own destroyer is the structural pattern of avatāra-līlā — the Lord walks into the very throat of evil to undo it from inside.
Now, what was to be done? How could both the killing of this demon and the saving of the devotees be performed simultaneously? Kṛṣṇa, being unlimitedly potent, decided to wait for an intelligent means by which He could simultaneously save the boys and kill the demon. Then He entered the mouth of Aghāsura.
Purport
Kṛṣṇa is known as ananta-vīrya-sarvajña because everything is known to Him. Because He knows everything perfectly well, it was not difficult for Him to find a means by which He could save the boys and at the same time kill the demon. Thus He also decided to enter the demon’s mouth.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Now, what was to be done? How could both the killing of this demon and the saving of the devotees be performed simultaneously? Kṛṣṇa, being unlimitedly potent, decided to wait for an intelligent means by which He could simultaneously save the boys and kill the demon. Then He entered the mouth of Aghāsura.
Commentary
What should I do in this dangerous situation? How can I at once kill the demon without harming the boys? Thinking in this way, and finding a solution, he entered the mouth of the serpent, because he is one who knows what to do in the present and future (asesa drk) and he takes away (hari) danger (for the devotee) and life (for the demon).
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
How to do both simultaneously? Thinking about this and understanding the solution, the attractive Lord who saw the perfect method entered the mouth of Aghāsura.
Kṛṣṇa saw the perfect way (aśeṣa-dṛk) to enjoy pastimes and liberate the demon, to protect the devotees and destroy the rascals. Or he saw the unlimited calves and boys. He then entered the snake because he was overcome with affection by seeing their condition. He is called Hari because he would remove their suffering and attract their minds.
Picture a master craftsman with two jobs that look mutually exclusive: save the friends already inside, and kill the killer who contains them. Lesser problem-solvers would sacrifice one for the other. Kṛṣṇa, being unlimited, waits for the cleaner solution — He enters the same mouth, and from inside accomplishes both. Bhakti's lesson: the Lord does not trade His devotees for His justice.
Stories
Prahlāda inside the fire
Prahlāda Mahārāja (SB 7.5) was thrown into fire, poison, off cliffs, and into the coils of serpents — and each time emerged unharmed because Bhagavān protected him from inside whatever danger was meant to consume him. Hiraṇyakaśipu, like Aghāsura, found that the trap he set turned into the chamber of his own destruction.
Gauḍīyas read both episodes through the same lens: Bhagavān saves the devotee not by removing the danger but by entering it. The cowherd boys in 10.12 walk into the python; the Person they belong to walks in after them and exits with them.
tadā—at that timeghana - chadāḥ—behind the cloudsdevāḥ—all the demigodsbhayāt—on account of feeling danger because Kṛṣṇa had entered the mouth of the demonhā - hā—alas, alasiti—in this waycukruśuḥ—they exclaimedjahṛṣuḥ—became jubilantye—thoseca—alsokaṁsa - ādyāḥ—Kaṁsa and otherskauṇapāḥ—the demonstu—indeedagha - bāndhavāḥ—the friends of Aghāsura .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadā ghana-cchadā devā
tadā
at that time
ghana - chadāḥ
behind the clouds
devāḥ
all the demigods
bhayād dhā-heti cukruśuḥ
bhayāt
on account of feeling danger because Kṛṣṇa had entered the mouth of the demon
hā - hā
alas, alas
iti
in this way
cukruśuḥ
they exclaimed
jahṛṣur ye ca kaṁsādyāḥ
jahṛṣuḥ
became jubilant
ye
those
ca
also
kaṁsa - ādyāḥ
Kaṁsa and others
kauṇapās tv agha-bāndhavāḥ
kauṇapāḥ
the demons
tu
indeed
agha - bāndhavāḥ
the friends of Aghāsura .
Important Words
ghana-chadāḥ—hidden behind clouds
Compound: ghana (cloud) + chada (cover). The devas hide — they cannot bear to watch openly. Gauḍīyas: even demigods, with their long lives and powers, have only the courage to peek. The cowherd boys, by contrast, walked in laughing.
hā-hā—alas, alas
Onomatopoeic vocative of grief. The same syllables that mark śoka in classical drama. Bhāgavatam uses everyday emotional sounds; the gods grieve in plain language.
kaṁsa-ādyāḥ—Kaṁsa and others
Compound: Kaṁsa + ādi (etcetera). The demoniac faction. Gauḍīyas note: Kaṁsa's enmity is in fact constant smaraṇa — he thinks of Kṛṣṇa more than most devotees do. Vairānubandha is a form of bhakti in inversion, which is why Kaṁsa too is liberated by Kṛṣṇa's hand.
agha-bāndhavāḥ—friends of Agha
Compound: agha (the demon, also 'sin') + bāndhava (kin, friend). 'Friends of sin' — a phrase that double-reads. Demoniac alliance is always alliance with sin itself. Gauḍīya satsaṅga logic: one is shaped by company.
When Kṛṣṇa entered the mouth of Aghāsura, the demigods hidden behind the clouds exclaimed, “Alas! Alas!” But the friends of Aghāsura, like Kaṁsa and other demons, were jubilant.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
When Kṛṣṇa entered the mouth of Aghāsura, the demigods hidden behind the clouds exclaimed, "Alas! Alas!" But the friends of Aghāsura, like Kaṁsa and other demons, were jubilant.
Commentary
The devatas, who were hiding in the clouds out of fear of Kamsa, began shouting, fearing Krsna’s safety. Though the devatas are aware of the Lord’s powers, because they are also devotees, they shouted in anxiety. The very nature of bhakti is to have affection, and the very nature of affection is to lose ones logical discriminatory powers. Kamsa and the raksasas (kauna pa—eaters of corpses), the sons and brothers of Aghasura, rejoiced on hearing the news from messengers.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The devatās hid behind the cloud because of fear of Kaṁsa and Agha. The word ca indicates other sinful people as well. Though Kaṁsa was a daitya demon he was also a Rākṣasa. There are considered the same here to indicate their extremely evil nature. Or the sentence can indicate demons like Kaṁsa and Rākṣasa. They were all overjoyed since by nature they hated the Lord. Glee arose within their evil minds. They became joyful because Kaṁsa heard about Agha swallowing the boys and Kṛṣṇa through spies who had arrived from Vraja.
His Holiness Bir Krishna Goswami· 2022-11-23· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture two galleries watching the same act through opposite emotions: the demigods, who love Kṛṣṇa, cry 'alas, alas' from behind their clouds; Kaṁsa's people, who hate Him, cheer. The same event is heard in opposite registers depending on whether the heart belongs to Bhagavān. Bhakti is in part a question of which audience one is in.
tat—that exclamation of hā-hāśrutvā—hearingbhagavān—the Supreme Personality of Godheadkṛṣṇaḥ—Lord Kṛṣṇatu—indeedavyayaḥ—never vanquishablesa - arbha - vatsakam—along with the cowherd boys and the calvescūrṇī - cikīrṣoḥ—of that demon, who desired to smash within the abdomenātmānam—personally, Himselftarasā—very soonvavṛdhe—enlargedgale—within the throat .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tac chrutvā bhagavān kṛṣṇas
tat
that exclamation of hā-hā
śrutvā
hearing
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
kṛṣṇaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
tu
indeed
tv avyayaḥ sārbha-vatsakam
avyayaḥ
never vanquishable
sa - arbha - vatsakam
along with the cowherd boys and the calves
cūrṇī-cikīrṣor ātmānaṁ
cūrṇī - cikīrṣoḥ
of that demon, who desired to smash within the abdomen
ātmānam
personally, Himself
tarasā vavṛdhe gale
tarasā
very soon
vavṛdhe
enlarged
gale
within the throat .
Important Words
avyayaḥ—the inexhaustible one
From a- (not) + vyaya (expenditure, decay). Kṛṣṇa is undiminishable. Bhagavad-gītā 2.17 uses the same word — 'know that to be indestructible by which all this is pervaded.' The Lord whom the demon thinks he is consuming is constitutively non-consumable.
sa-arbha-vatsakam—along with the boys and the calves
Compound: sa (with) + arbha (boy) + vatsaka (little calf). Kṛṣṇa's protective concern includes the calves too. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's rakṣaṇa extends to every creature in His association, not just the human devotees.
cūrṇī-cikīrṣoḥ—of him who wished to grind them to powder
Compound: cūrṇa (powder) + cikīrṣu (desirous to make). 'Powder-wanting-to-make' — a tight grammatical noun. The demon's intent named precisely; Kṛṣṇa's act is direct response.
vavṛdhe—He expanded
From vṛdh- (to grow). Kṛṣṇa's body grew. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's body is acintya — limited and unlimited at once. The same hand Yaśodā holds in chapter 9 here fills the throat of an eight-mile demon. Acintya-bhedābheda of His own form.
When the invincible Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, heard the demigods crying “Alas! Alas!” from behind the clouds, He immediately enlarged Himself within the demon’s throat, just to save Himself and the cowherd boys, His own associates, from the demon who wished to smash them.
Purport
Such are the acts of Kṛṣṇa. Paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ vināśāya ca duṣkṛtām ( Bg. 4.8 ). By enlarging Himself within the throat of the demon, Kṛṣṇa suffocated and killed him and at the same time saved Himself and His associates from imminent death and also saved the demigods from lamentation.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
When the invincible Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, heard the demigods crying "Alas! Alas!" from behind the clouds, He immediately enlarged Himself within the demon's throat, just to save Himself and the cowherd boys, His own associates, from the demon who wished to smash them.
Commentary
Hearing the sounds of dismay from the devatas, and the sounds of rejoicing from the demons, Krsna then expanded his form in the throat of the snake, who tried to swallow him into his stomach and digest him and the other boys. Krsna did this to reverse sounds of the lamentations of the devatas and the sounds of rejoicing of the demons. In the pastimes of killing Sakatasura, Trnavarta, and getting bound up, Krsna remained in a very small form and spread his powers. Therefore in the throat of Aghasura he expanded his form to show that he did not lack the power to expand himself in size. In the Damodara and other pastimes the Lord maintained his small form suitably because the devotees could taste in that form the full sweetness and within that, the astonishment caused by a show of power, with no disturbance to the conception of Krsna as their child. But here in the absence of the two parents who were relishing the sweetness, he, being the Lord, took the more common method of just expanding himself to kill the demon.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
When he heard the shouts of the devatās, Kṛṣṇa expanded himself in the throat of the demon who wanted to crush him and the boys by shutting his mouth and rolling his body about. He expanded his body to a big size, like a spike, in order to plug the throat of the demon so that his mouth would stay open and he would die. He could to this because he was Bhagavān, full of all powers and he did not decrease in power (avyayaḥ). Thus all fear of failure was removed. Or why did he expand himself? He does not allow dissipation of his devotees (avyayaḥ). He did it to protect his devotees. The reason is that he is Kṛṣṇa, whose heart is attracted (kṛṣ) by the devotees.
Picture a flame that suddenly expands until the lantern it sits in cannot hold it — except here the lantern is a demon's throat, and the flame is the Lord of all worlds. Kṛṣṇa's response to His friends' danger is not a weapon and not a mantra; it is His own body, enlarged to choke evil from within.
tataḥ—after Kṛṣṇa took action to kill the demon’s body from within the mouthati - kāyasya—of that great demon, who had expanded his body to a very large sizeniruddha - mārgiṇaḥ—because of suffocating, all outlets being stopped uphi udgīrṇa - dṛṣṭeḥ—whose eyes had popped outbhramataḥ tu itaḥ tataḥ—the eyeballs, or the life air, moving here and therepūrṇaḥ—completely filledantaḥ - aṅge—within the bodypavanaḥ—the life airniruddhaḥ—being stoppedmūrdhan—the hole in the top of the headvinirbhidya—breakingvinirgataḥ—went outbahiḥ—externally .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato ’tikāyasya niruddha-mārgiṇo
tataḥ
after Kṛṣṇa took action to kill the demon’s body from within the mouth
hy udgīrṇa-dṛṣṭer bhramatas tv itas tataḥ
ati - kāyasya
of that great demon, who had expanded his body to a very large size
pūrṇo ’ntar-aṅge pavano niruddho
niruddha - mārgiṇaḥ
because of suffocating, all outlets being stopped up
mūrdhan vinirbhidya vinirgato bahiḥ
hi udgīrṇa - dṛṣṭeḥ
whose eyes had popped out
bhramataḥ tu itaḥ tataḥ
the eyeballs, or the life air, moving here and there
pūrṇaḥ
completely filled
antaḥ - aṅge
within the body
pavanaḥ
the life air
niruddhaḥ
being stopped
mūrdhan
the hole in the top of the head
vinirbhidya
breaking
vinirgataḥ
went out
bahiḥ
externally .
Important Words
ati-kāyasya—of him with an excessively large body
Compound: ati (excessive) + kāya (body). The demon's body becomes hyperbolic — even bigger than at verse 16. Yet still finite. Gauḍīyas: no quantity of māyic expansion can match Bhagavān's qualitative infinity.
niruddha-mārgiṇaḥ—whose passages were blocked
Compound: niruddha (blocked) + mārga (path). All openings sealed. The same niroddhum used in verse 25 (Kṛṣṇa wishing to restrain His friends) returns as niruddha — Kṛṣṇa restrains the demon instead. Verbal echo across the chapter.
mūrdhan vinirbhidya—breaking out through the head
Compound: mūrdhan (crown of head) + vinirbhidya (breaking through). The prāṇa exits through the brahma-randhra — the same opening through which yogīs voluntarily leave the body at death (BG 8.10–13). Gauḍīyas read this as the gift of liberation given to Aghāsura through Kṛṣṇa's body.
pavanaḥ—life-air
Wind, breath — but specifically the prāṇa. The demon's vital air, having nowhere else to go, departs as a liberated soul departs. The mechanism of his death is also the mechanism of his mukti.
Then, because Kṛṣṇa had increased the size of His body, the demon extended his own body to a very large size. Nonetheless, his breathing stopped, he suffocated, and his eyes rolled here and there and popped out. The demon’s life air, however, could not pass through any outlet, and therefore it finally burst out through a hole in the top of the demon’s head.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Then, because Kṛṣṇa had increased the size of His body, the demon extended his own body to a very large size. Nonetheless, his breathing stopped, he suffocated, and his eyes rolled here and there and popped out. The demon's life air, however, could not pass through any outlet, and therefore it finally burst out through a hole in the top of the demon's head.
Commentary
His throat blocked up (niruddha marginoh), his eyes falling out, the air, trapped in his body with no way of getting out, went out through the brahma randhra at the top of the head, and attained perfection (purnah).
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Because Kṛṣṇa had expanded (tataḥ), Agha suffocated certainly (hi) and (tu) he became bewildered (bhramataḥ). He became like an insane person, thinking in pain “Where am I? Where will I go?” He became completely full, because his prāṇa was blocked. Thus his body swelled bigger and because of that, the prāṇa burst out of his head from a special spot (vi), the brahma-rundhra.
Picture a balloon being inflated from the inside until it bursts — except the balloon is a demon's head, and the air is Kṛṣṇa Himself, growing without limit. The demon also tries to grow, but a finite creature cannot keep pace with the Infinite. His own life-air, with no other exit, breaks through the crown of his skull.
tena eva—through that brahma-randhra, or the hole in the top of the headsarveṣu—all the air within the bodybahiḥ gateṣu—having gone outprāṇeṣu—the life airs, along with the vital forcevatsān—the calvessuhṛdaḥ—the cowherd boyfriendsparetān—who were all dead withindṛṣṭyā svayā—by Kṛṣṇa’s glancing overutthāpya—brought them back to lifetat - anvitaḥ—thus accompanied by thempunaḥ—againvaktrāt—from the mouthmukundaḥ—the Supreme Personality of Godheadbhagavān—Kṛṣṇaviniryayau—came out .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tenaiva sarveṣu bahir gateṣu
tena eva
through that brahma-randhra, or the hole in the top of the head
sarveṣu
all the air within the body
bahiḥ gateṣu
having gone out
prāṇeṣu vatsān suhṛdaḥ paretān
prāṇeṣu
the life airs, along with the vital force
vatsān
the calves
suhṛdaḥ
the cowherd boyfriends
paretān
who were all dead within
dṛṣṭyā svayotthāpya tad-anvitaḥ punar
dṛṣṭyā svayā
by Kṛṣṇa’s glancing over
utthāpya
brought them back to life
tat - anvitaḥ
thus accompanied by them
punaḥ
again
vaktrān mukundo bhagavān viniryayau
vaktrāt
from the mouth
mukundaḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
bhagavān
Kṛṣṇa
viniryayau
came out .
Important Words
paretān—those who had passed away
From parā + i (to go away). The boys and calves who had technically died inside the demon. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān can revive what is already dead — He is mṛtyor mṛtyu, the death of death. Bhāgavatam 1.18 lists this as a sign of avatāra-tattva.
dṛṣṭyā svayā—by His own glance
Compound: dṛṣṭi (glance) + sva (own). His glance alone revives them — no mantra, no implement. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa-darśana is itself life-giving; even a glance carries the full force of Bhagavān.
mukundaḥ—the giver of liberation
muk (mukti) + da (giver). One of the Lord's principal names. Inserted at precisely the moment of giving life back — and also the moment of giving sārūpya-mukti to Aghāsura (verse 38). The name does double work: liberator of the boys, liberator of the demon.
viniryayau—He came out
From vi + nir + yā (to go out completely). Kṛṣṇa walks out of the demon's mouth as casually as He walked in. Gauḍīyas: every entry of the Lord into apparent peril ends in viniryāṇa — going out unchanged, with all His own intact.
When all the demon’s life air had passed away through that hole in the top of his head, Kṛṣṇa glanced over the dead calves and cowherd boys and brought them back to life. Then Mukunda, who can give one liberation, came out from the demon’s mouth with His friends and the calves.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
When all the demon's life air had passed away through that hole in the top of his head, Kṛṣṇa glanced over the dead calves and cowherd boys and brought them back to life. Then Mukunda, who can give one liberation, came out from the demon's mouth with His friends and the calves.
Commentary
The cowherd boys and calves who fainted due to separation from Krsna and from the heat of the serpent’s stomach, were brought back to consciousness by Krsna’s glance, which was a shower of nectar.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
When all his senses passed out along with the prāṇa (tena), or when all his life airs passed out through the brahma-randhra (tena), seeing the boys who momentarily looked as if dead because of following after the Lord’s human-like pastimes, he revived them to action by his sweet, affectionate glance. Mukunda, he who liberated Agha from saṁsāra and frees the boys from Agha, since he is the Supreme Lord who appeared on his own to benefit the universe (bhagavān), with the boys behind him (tad-anvitaḥ), came out of the snake’s mouth in bliss (vi=vinoda).
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)
Picture a master who steps out of a collapsed building with every child accounted for — and a few who had stopped breathing now revived by His glance. Mukunda walks out of Aghāsura's mouth as easily as out of a doorway, and behind Him come the friends He went in to save. The verse names Him Mukunda precisely here, where He gives mukti.
pīna—very greatahi - bhoga - utthitam—issuing from the serpent’s body, which was meant for material enjoymentadbhutam—very wonderfulmahat—greatjyotiḥ—effulgencesva - dhāmnā—by his own illuminationjvalayat—making glaringdiśaḥ daśa—all the ten directionspratīkṣya—waitingkhe—in the skyavasthitam—individually stayingīśa - nirgamam—until the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, came outviveśa—enteredtasmin—in the body of Kṛṣṇamiṣatām—while observingdivaukasām—all the demigods .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pīnāhi-bhogotthitam adbhutaṁ mahaj
pīna
very great
ahi - bhoga - utthitam
issuing from the serpent’s body, which was meant for material enjoyment
adbhutam
very wonderful
mahat
great
jyotiḥ sva-dhāmnā jvalayad diśo daśa
jyotiḥ
effulgence
sva - dhāmnā
by his own illumination
jvalayat
making glaring
diśaḥ daśa
all the ten directions
pratīkṣya khe ’vasthitam īśa-nirgamaṁ
pratīkṣya
waiting
khe
in the sky
avasthitam
individually staying
īśa - nirgamam
until the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, came out
viveśa tasmin miṣatāṁ divaukasām
viveśa
entered
tasmin
in the body of Kṛṣṇa
miṣatām
while observing
divaukasām
all the demigods .
Important Words
ahi-bhoga-utthitam—risen from the python's body
Compound: ahi (serpent) + bhoga (coil, body of a snake) + utthita (risen). 'Risen from the serpent-coil.' Even from a demon's body, a brilliant ātmā emerges. Gauḍīyas: the jīva is not its outer form — Aghāsura's ātmā is no less precious to Bhagavān than a sage's.
jyotiḥ—effulgence
Light, splendor. Specifically the technical jyotiḥ-svarūpa of a liberated being. The same word Bhagavad-gītā 13.18 uses for paramaṁ jyotiḥ — but Gauḍīyas distinguish: this is a jīva-jyotiḥ merging into Bhagavān's body, not the impersonal brahmajyoti.
īśa-nirgamam—the exit of the Lord
Compound: īśa (Lord) + nirgama (exit). The soul waited specifically for the Lord to come out before it would enter Him. Gauḍīyas: even Aghāsura's soul knows protocol — Bhagavān is not entered without His permission.
viveśa tasmin—entered into Him
From vi + viś (to enter). The demon's soul merges into Kṛṣṇa's body. Gauḍīyas read this carefully: this is sārūpya-mukti (verse 38 clarifies) — the soul retains form similar to Kṛṣṇa's, not impersonal merger. Acintya-bhedābheda: one with Him, distinct in Him.
From the body of the gigantic python, a glaring effulgence came out, illuminating all directions, and stayed individually in the sky until Kṛṣṇa came out from the corpse’s mouth. Then, as all the demigods looked on, this effulgence entered into Kṛṣṇa’s body.
Purport
Apparently the serpent named Aghāsura, because of having received association with Kṛṣṇa, attained mukti by entering Kṛṣṇa’s body. Entering the body of Kṛṣṇa is called sāyujya-mukti, but later verses prove that Aghāsura, like Dantavakra and others, received sārūpya-mukti. This has been broadly described by Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura with references from the Vaiṣṇava-toṣaṇī of Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī. Aghāsura attained sārūpya-mukti, being promoted to the Vaikuṇṭha planets to live with the same four-armed bodily features as Viṣṇu. The explanation of how this is so may be summarized as follows. The effulgence came out from the python’s body and became purified, attaining spiritual śuddha-sattva, freedom from material contamination, because Kṛṣṇa had stayed within the serpent’s body, even after the serpent’s death. One may doubt that such a demon, full of mischievous activities, could attain the liberation of sārūpya or sāyujya, and one may be astonished about this. But Kṛṣṇa is so kind that in order to drive away such doubts, He had the effulgence, the individual life of the python, wait for some time in its individuality, in the presence of all the demigods. Kṛṣṇa is the full effulgence, and every living being is part and parcel of that effulgence. As proved here, the effulgence in every living being is individual. For some time, the effulgence remained outside the demon’s body, individually, and did not mix with the whole effulgence, the brahmajyoti. The Brahman effulgence is not visible to material eyes, but to prove that every living being is individual, Kṛṣṇa had this individual effulgence stay outside the demon’s body for some time, for everyone to see. Then Kṛṣṇa proved that anyone killed by Him attains liberation, whether sāyujya, sārūpya, sāmīpya or whatever. But the liberation of those who are on the transcendental platform of love and affection is vimukti, special liberation. Thus the serpent first entered the body of Kṛṣṇa personally and mixed with the Brahman effulgence. This merging is called sāyujya-mukti. But from later verses we find that Aghāsura attained sārūpya-mukti. Text 38 explains that Aghāsura attained a body exactly like that of Viṣṇu, and the verse after that also clearly states that he attained a completely spiritual body like that of Nārāyaṇa. Therefore in two or three places the Bhāgavatam has confirmed that Aghāsura attained sārūpya-mukti. One may then argue, How is it that he mixed with the Brahman effulgence? The answer is that as Jaya and Vijaya, after three births, again attained sārūpya-mukti and association with the Lord, Aghāsura received a similar liberation.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
From the body of the gigantic python, a glaring effulgence came out, illuminating all directions, and stayed individually in the sky until Kṛṣṇa came out from the corpse's mouth. Then, as all the demigods looked on, this effulgence entered into Kṛṣṇa's body.
Commentary
The light in the serpent’s body was suddha sattva according to Sridhara Swami. That an evil person can get liberation as illustrated here is for instilling faith in the people. Thought the soul is normally invisible, embraced by the sakti of the Lord, this soul became visible directly as a great light. This is Jiva Goswami’s opinion, in the vaisnava tosani. Like the great light of the para brahman, the light of the soul is not visible to material eyes, it became visible by the Lord’s will, like his own form, in order to show all the world directly the Lord’s quality of giving liberation even to the demons. This is one opinion. According to verses 38 and 39, Aghasura attained a form like the Lord’s and attained the Lord’s abode. From this it is clear that Aghasura did not attain mere sayujya mukti, but svarupya mukti. Therefore the light which was visible was the light from Aghasura’s spiritual body which he attained at that moment. Because the body itself was spiritual, it could not be seen with material eyes. His entrance into the Lord’s body was just a show as in the case of Sisupala and Dantavakra. Though Sisupala and Dantavakra attained sarupya as eternal associates of the Lord, when they died a light from their bodies entered into the Lord. This is another opinion about the visibility of the light. This happened in the presence of the devatas (misatam divaukasam) who were greatly astonished. It can also mean with the use of genative absolute, that Aghasuras soul entered Krsna, not paying attention to the devas though they were present.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The light was indescribable (adbhūtam) because of it was so bright. The devatās looked on. This statement is in the locative case to indicate that they were incidental. The soul of Agha was waiting only for Kṛṣṇa. Or the devatās looked on in astonishment since a sinner was liberated and because they could observe the process of liberation which is beyond material perception. This was arranged by the Lord so that Brahmā and others would have no doubt and to astonish them. Since the jīva has no form and is therefore not visible, it became a form possessing light by investment of the power of the Lord.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The light was indescribable (adbhūtam) because it was so bright. The devatās looked on. This statement is in the locative case to indicate that the devatās were incidental. The soul of Agha was waiting only for Kṛṣṇa. Or the devatās looked on in astonishment since a sinner was liberated and because they could observe the process of liberation which is beyond material perception. Thus, by seeing it directly, there was no doubt about his liberation. This was also astonishing to Brahmā. The light entering Kṛṣṇa is only an appearance. Actually, one merges in Brahman. This liberation which amounts to non-existence, is not the final goal. Because it is contrary to bhakti-rasa, it is rejected by the devotees. It is proper that demons attain this goal. That is the Vaiṣṇava conclusion. It is explained in Bhāgavatāmṛta.
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)
Picture a light leaving a body and waiting in the sky as if it had to ask permission before going home — and then, the moment its Lord emerges, the light rushes into Him. Aghāsura's soul is a particle that has waited eight miles long for its moment; that moment is Kṛṣṇa walking out of his mouth.
tataḥ—thereafterati - hṛṣṭāḥ—everyone becoming very much pleasedsva - kṛtaḥ—own respective dutyakṛta—executedarhaṇam—in the shape of worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godheadpuṣpaiḥ—by showering flowers grown in Nandana-kānana from the heavenssu - gāḥ—the celestial singersapsarasaḥ ca—and the celestial dancing girlsnartanaiḥ—by dancinggītaiḥ—by singing celestial songssurāḥ—all the demigodsvādya - dharāḥ ca—those who played on musical drumsvādyakaiḥ—by playing respectivelystavaiḥ ca—and by offering prayersviprāḥ—the brāhmaṇasjaya - niḥsvanaiḥ—simply by glorifying the Supreme Personality of Godheadgaṇāḥ—everyone .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato ’tihṛṣṭāḥ sva-kṛto ’kṛtārhaṇaṁ
tataḥ
thereafter
ati - hṛṣṭāḥ
everyone becoming very much pleased
sva - kṛtaḥ
own respective duty
akṛta
executed
arhaṇam
in the shape of worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead
puṣpaiḥ sugā apsarasaś ca nartanaiḥ
puṣpaiḥ
by showering flowers grown in Nandana-kānana from the heavens
su - gāḥ
the celestial singers
apsarasaḥ ca
and the celestial dancing girls
nartanaiḥ
by dancing
gītaiḥ surā vādya-dharāś ca vādyakaiḥ
gītaiḥ
by singing celestial songs
surāḥ
all the demigods
vādya - dharāḥ ca
those who played on musical drums
vādyakaiḥ
by playing respectively
stavaiś ca viprā jaya-niḥsvanair gaṇāḥ
stavaiḥ ca
and by offering prayers
viprāḥ
the brāhmaṇas
jaya - niḥsvanaiḥ
simply by glorifying the Supreme Personality of Godhead
gaṇāḥ
everyone .
Important Words
puṣpaiḥ—with flowers
Specifically flowers from Nandana-kānana, the celestial garden of Indra. Gauḍīyas: the devas can offer flowers from their gardens, but Vraja itself offers Kṛṣṇa His own — and Kṛṣṇa prefers Vraja's wildflowers (verse 4).
apsarasaḥ—celestial dancing-girls
The apsarās dance in celebration. Gauḍīyas distinguish: their dance is courtly and performance-oriented; the gopīs' dance in the rāsa-līlā (Canto 10.29-33) is rasa itself. Apsarās are skilled; gopīs are beloved.
stavaiḥ—with hymns of praise
From stu- (to praise). Stava is the technical term for formal devotional praise. Rūpa Gosvāmī's Stava-mālā collects such hymns. Vedic and Vaiṣṇava devotion both express in stava — across the universe, the response to Kṛṣṇa's līlā is praise.
jaya-niḥsvanaiḥ—with cries of 'Jaya! Jaya!'
Compound: jaya (victory) + niḥsvana (sound, cry). The brāhmaṇas cry 'victory.' Gauḍīyas inherit this cry — 'jaya' is the everyday Vaiṣṇava salutation: Jaya Śrī Kṛṣṇa Caitanya, Jaya Rādhe.
Thereafter, everyone being pleased, the demigods began to shower flowers from Nandana-kānana, the celestial dancing girls began to dance, and the Gandharvas, who are famous for singing, offered songs of prayer. The drummers began to beat their kettledrums, and the brāhmaṇas offered Vedic hymns. In this way, both in the heavens and on earth, everyone began to perform his own duties, glorifying the Lord.
Purport
Everyone has some particular duty. The śāstra has concluded ( nirūpitaḥ ) that everyone should glorify the Supreme Personality of Godhead by his own qualifications. If you are a singer, always glorify the Supreme Lord by singing very nicely. If you are a musician, glorify the Supreme Lord by playing musical instruments. Svanuṣṭhitasya dharmasya saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam ( Bhāg. 1.2.13 ). The perfection of life is to satisfy the Personality of Godhead. Therefore, beginning from this earth up to the celestial kingdom, everyone engaged in glorifying the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The decision of all great saintly persons is that whatever qualifications one has acquired should be utilized to glorify the Supreme Lord. idaṁ hi puṁsas tapasaḥ śrutasya vā sviṣṭasya sūktasya ca buddhi-dattayoḥ avicyuto ’rthaḥ kavibhir nirūpito yad uttamaśloka-guṇānuvarṇanam “Learned sages have definitely concluded that the infallible purpose of the advancement of knowledge, austerity, Vedic study, sacrifice, the chanting of hymns, and charity is found in the transcendental descriptions of the qualities of the Lord, who is defined in choice poetry.” ( Bhāg. 1.5.22 ) This is the perfection of life. One should be trained how to glorify the Supreme Personality of Godhead by one’s respective qualities. Education, austerity, penance or, in the modern world, business, industry, education and so on — all should be engaged in glorifying the Lord. Then everyone in the world will be happy. Kṛṣṇa comes, therefore, to exhibit His transcendental activities so that people may have the chance to glorify Him in every respect. To understand how to glorify the Lord is actual research work. It is not that everything should be understood without God. That is condemned. bhagavad-bhakti-hīnasya jātiḥ śāstraṁ japas tapaḥ aprāṇasyaiva dehasya maṇḍanaṁ loka-rañjanam ( Hari-bhakti-sudhodaya 3.11) Without bhagavad-bhakti, without glorification of the Supreme Lord, whatever we have is simply a decoration of the dead body.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, everyone being pleased, the demigods began to shower flowers from Nandana-kānana, the celestial dancing girls began to dance, and the Gandharvas, who are famous for singing, offered songs of prayer. The drummers began to beat their kettledrums, and the brāhmaṇas offered Vedic hymns. In this way, both in the heavens and on earth, everyone began to perform his own duties, glorifying the Lord.
Commentary
The devas peformed (akrta) the worship (arhanam) of Krsna he who creates himself (svakrtah). Su ga meaning those who sing beautifully, refers to the gandharvas. Vadyadhara means the vidyadharas. Vipras means vasistha and others. Ganah means garuda and others.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
After Kṛṣṇa emerged from the snake (tataḥ) they rejoiced. Vādya-dhārāḥ means Vidyadhāras. Another version has vāridhārāḥ (clouds). The brāhmaṇas were Nārada and others. Gaṇāḥ refers to Garuḍa and others.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
After Kṛṣṇa emerged from the snake (tataḥ) they rejoiced, because the demon was killed and he attained liberation. Vādya-dhārāḥ means Vidyadhāras. The brāhmaṇas were Nārada and others.
Another version has su (splendid) instead of ca twice. By rejoicing they appeared to be splendid. Surāḥ means “those who give splendor.” This means even the flowers were splendid. Sugā means that the songs were splendid. The stavas were splendid by their nature, because they could not accomplish their task of praising properly. Ganāḥ refers to associates of the Lord, or to the cowherd boys. Thus the sounds of jaya that they uttered were also splendid.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-09· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a triumph being celebrated in three layers at once — flowers from celestial gardens, dancing apsarās, drums and Vedic chants — all because a five-year-old boy walked out of a python's mouth in a forest. The cosmos has its own response system to Vraja-līlā: every chamber of the universe automatically erupts.
tat—that celebration performed by the demigods in the upper planetary systemadbhuta—wonderfulstotra—prayerssu - vādya—glorious musical sounds of drums and other instrumentsgītikā—celestial songsjaya - ādi—sounds of jaya, etc.na - eka - utsava—celebrations simply for glorifying the Supreme Personality of Godheadmaṅgala - svanān—transcendental sounds auspicious for everyoneśrutvā—hearing such soundssva - dhāmnaḥ—from his abodeanti—nearbyajaḥ—Lord Brahmāāgataḥ—coming thereacirāt—very soondṛṣṭvā—seeingmahi—the glorificationīśasya—of Lord Kṛṣṇajagāma vismayam—became astonished .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad-adbhuta-stotra-suvādya-gītikā-
tat
that celebration performed by the demigods in the upper planetary system
adbhuta
wonderful
stotra
prayers
su - vādya
glorious musical sounds of drums and other instruments
gītikā
celestial songs
jayādi-naikotsava-maṅgala-svanān
jaya - ādi
sounds of jaya, etc.
na - eka - utsava
celebrations simply for glorifying the Supreme Personality of Godhead
maṅgala - svanān
transcendental sounds auspicious for everyone
śrutvā sva-dhāmno ’nty aja āgato ’cirād
śrutvā
hearing such sounds
sva - dhāmnaḥ
from his abode
anti
nearby
ajaḥ
Lord Brahmā
āgataḥ
coming there
acirāt
very soon
dṛṣṭvā mahīśasya jagāma vismayam
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
mahi
the glorification
īśasya
of Lord Kṛṣṇa
jagāma vismayam
became astonished .
Important Words
ajaḥ—the unborn (Brahmā)
From a- (not) + ja (born). 'Unborn' — a Vedic epithet of Brahmā, who was born from Viṣṇu's lotus-navel and so is 'self-born' (svayambhū). Gauḍīyas: even the 'unborn' Brahmā has Viṣṇu as his source; ajatva belongs primarily to Bhagavān.
īśasya—of the Lord
From īś- (to rule). The verse explicitly names Kṛṣṇa as īśa — and Brahmā, who is the creator-īśa of this universe, comes down to see the higher īśa. The Bhāgavatam is clear: Brahmā is a designation, Kṛṣṇa is the original.
vismayam—astonishment
From vi + smi- (to be amazed). The same word recurs in chapter 13 when Brahmā is even more astonished. Gauḍīyas: vismaya is itself a rasa-component (adbhuta-rasa); seeing Kṛṣṇa's līlā astounds even the creator.
ajaḥ āgataḥ—the unborn came
Compound phrase: ajaḥ (Brahmā) + āgata (came). 'The unborn arrived' — almost a paradox. The 'unborn' creator arrives at the scene of the 'born' Bhagavān's līlā. Acintya: who is unborn and who is born is not what it looks like.
When Lord Brahmā heard the wonderful ceremony going on near his planet, accompanied by music and songs and sounds of “Jaya! Jaya!” he immediately came down to see the function. Upon seeing so much glorification of Lord Kṛṣṇa, he was completely astonished.
Purport
Here the word anti means “near,” indicating that even in the higher planetary systems near Brahmaloka, like Maharloka, Janaloka and Tapoloka, the festival of glorification of Lord Kṛṣṇa was going on.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
When Lord Brahmā heard the wonderful ceremony going on near his planet, accompanied by music and songs and sounds of "Jaya! Jaya!" he immediately came down to see the function. Upon seeing so much glorification of Lord Kṛṣṇa, he was completely astonished.
Commentary
There was the sound of wonderful stutis, beauty instrumental music, soft singing, shouts of jaya jaya combining to make, not one festival, but an infinity of festivals. From mahaloka to jana loka from jana loka to tapoloka, the inhabitants were listening and then singing. From tapoloka next to brahmaloka (svadhamnah anti-next to brahma loka), Brahma heard the singing. While the light of Aghasura was going to Vaikuntha, at that time, to see the glory of Krsna (isasya mahi), Brahma (ajah) came to Vrndavana, unseen by others, and was astonished. Or it can mean: coming to Vrndavana and seeing his glory, he was astonished.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Hearing the remarkable glorification, Brahmā quickly came from his abode close to (anti) Kṛṣṇa and seeing the glory (mahi) of Kṛṣṇa, in giving liberation to the demon, seeing what he had not seen anywhere else, he was amazed.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Ādi indicates the āpsaras ankle bells sounding and clapping of hands. Maṅgala-svanān refers to words like namo namaḥ. Brahmā saw the greatness (mahi) of Kṛṣṇa: giving liberation, various pastimes in Vṛndāvana, his clothing and beauty. The stotras were astonishing or all the items such as music and singing were astonishing. There was great rejoicing (naikotsasva). Or the auspicious sounds were full of rejoicing. Mahīśasya can also mean mahīśam. He saw the lord (mahīśam) who appeared on earth to protect it and spread his unlimited glories.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-10· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture the architect of the universe leaning out of his window because he hears music — and what he sees astounds him. Brahmā has built the cosmos, but he has not understood Vraja. The chapter that begins with Aghāsura ends with Brahmā arriving curious, and the next chapter is the Brahmā-vimohana, in which Vraja teaches him.
Stories
Brahmā's bewilderment in the next chapter
Chapter 12 ends with Brahmā landing astonished. Chapter 13 is the immediate sequel: Brahmā, still puzzled, steals all the cowherd boys and calves to test Kṛṣṇa — and Kṛṣṇa instantly expands Himself into every boy and every calf, so that the mothers of Vraja love these new sons more than the originals. After a full year Brahmā returns, sees the trick, and falls at Kṛṣṇa's feet praying the famous Brahma-stuti (10.14).
Gauḍīyas read 10.12.35 as the structural hinge: Brahmā arrives unprepared and is about to be schooled by Vraja. The Aghāsura-līlā is the setup for the higher teaching that even the creator does not know who the cowherd boy really is.
rājan—O Mahārāja Parīkṣitājagaram carma—the dry body of Aghāsura, which remained only a big skinśuṣkam—when it completely dried upvṛndāvane adbhutam—like a wonderful museum piece in Vṛndāvanavraja - okasām—for the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvanabahu - titham—for many days, or for a long timebabhūva—becameākrīḍa—sporting placegahvaram—a cave .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājann ājagaraṁ carma
rājan
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit
ājagaram carma
the dry body of Aghāsura, which remained only a big skin
śuṣkaṁ vṛndāvane ’dbhutam
śuṣkam
when it completely dried up
vṛndāvane adbhutam
like a wonderful museum piece in Vṛndāvana
vrajaukasāṁ bahu-tithaṁ
vraja - okasām
for the inhabitants of Vrajabhūmi, Vṛndāvana
bahu - titham
for many days, or for a long time
babhūvākrīḍa-gahvaram
babhūva
became
ākrīḍa
sporting place
gahvaram
a cave .
Important Words
ājagaram carma—the python's skin
Compound: ājagara (python) + carma (skin). Only the skin remained — the demon's body was emptied of life and of poison. Gauḍīyas: when Kṛṣṇa removes evil, He leaves the form harmless. The dried skin is the visible record of His act.
vraja-okasām—for the residents of Vraja
Compound: vraja + okas (dweller). The same term used in verse 12. Vraja-okasaḥ are the privileged audience and beneficiaries of every līlā — even of a demon's death-cave.
ākrīḍa—play-ground
From ā + krīḍ- (to play). A formal noun for 'place of play.' The verse names the demon's corpse an ākrīḍa — playground. Gauḍīyas: in Vraja, everything tends toward līlā; even death-relics become play-equipment.
bahu-titham—for many days
Compound: bahu (many) + titha (day). The site remained for a long time — Bhāgavatam is interested in geographic permanence. Vraja-sthalas are not metaphors; they are physical places that the Gosvāmīs later mapped.
O King Parīkṣit, when the python-shaped body of Aghāsura dried up into merely a big skin, it became a wonderful place for the inhabitants of Vṛndāvana to visit, and it remained so for a long, long time.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit, when the python-shaped body of Aghāsura dried up into merely a big skin, it became a wonderful place for the inhabitants of Vṛndāvana to visit, and it remained so for a long, long time.
Commentary
The dry skin of the snake remained there for a long time (bahutitham) and became a cave in which the children used to carry out various pastimes.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
By the power of Kṛṣṇa’s touch the demon became successful. What more can be said? As in the case of Pūtanā, even his dead body became fragrant and most attractive. Śukadeva addressed Parīkṣit out of great astonishment.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
By the power of Kṛṣṇa’s touch the demon became successful. What more can be said? As in the case of Pūtanā, even his dead body became fragrant and most attractive. Śukadeva addressed Parīkṣit out of great astonishment or joy. The skin became suitable for playing, used as an instrument etc. It stayed there for a long time. It was also a cave used for playing in all sorts of ways (ākrīḍa).
Picture a children's play-place that is also a sacred site — a hollow skin of a great demon, dried and emptied, become a cave for tag and stories. Vraja absorbs even its enemies as architecture. The python who came to swallow the children ends as their playhouse.
Stories
Caitanya and the Six Gosvāmīs recovering the Vraja-sthalas
When Caitanya Mahāprabhu sent Rūpa and Sanātana to Vṛndāvana, the holy places had been overgrown for centuries. The Six Gosvāmīs walked the dust of Vraja, identifying each spot — this is where Kṛṣṇa danced the rāsa, this is where Pūtanā fell, this is the very cave that was once Aghāsura's body.
Gauḍīyas treat 10.12.36 as the textual basis for the existence of Aghāsura-līlā-sthala as a pilgrimage site. The verse explicitly says it 'remained a play-place for a long, long time' — meaning the very ground of Vraja is the archive of Kṛṣṇa's pastimes.
etat—this incident of delivering both Aghāsura and Kṛṣṇa’s associates from deathkaumāra - jam karma—performed during their kaumāra age (the age of five years)hareḥ—of the Supreme Personality of Godheadātma—the devotees are the Lord’s heart and soulahi - mokṣaṇam—their deliverance and the deliverance of the pythonmṛtyoḥ—from the path of repeated birth and deathpaugaṇḍake—at the age of paugaṇḍa, beginning with the sixth year (one year later)bālāḥ—all the boysdṛṣṭvā ūcuḥ—disclosed the fact after one yearvismitāḥ—as if it had happened on that very dayvraje—in Vṛndāvana .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etat kaumārajaṁ karma
etat
this incident of delivering both Aghāsura and Kṛṣṇa’s associates from death
kaumāra - jam karma
performed during their kaumāra age (the age of five years)
harer ātmāhi-mokṣaṇam
hareḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
ātma
the devotees are the Lord’s heart and soul
ahi - mokṣaṇam
their deliverance and the deliverance of the python
mṛtyoḥ paugaṇḍake bālā
mṛtyoḥ
from the path of repeated birth and death
paugaṇḍake
at the age of paugaṇḍa, beginning with the sixth year (one year later)
bālāḥ
all the boys
dṛṣṭvocur vismitā vraje
dṛṣṭvā ūcuḥ
disclosed the fact after one year
vismitāḥ
as if it had happened on that very day
vraje
in Vṛndāvana .
Important Words
kaumāra-jam karma—the act performed in kaumāra age
Compound: kaumāra (childhood, 1-5) + ja (born of) + karma (act). Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa's līlā is age-stratified — kaumāra (1-5), paugaṇḍa (6-10), kaiśora (11-15). Aghāsura-vadha is technically kaumāra-līlā, the youngest stratum.
ātma-ahi-mokṣaṇam—His own and the python's liberation
Compound: ātma (self / His own) + ahi (serpent) + mokṣaṇa (release). 'His own deliverance AND the python's liberation' — both effected in one act. Gauḍīyas read the double genitive: Kṛṣṇa simultaneously freed Himself, the boys, and the demon.
paugaṇḍake—during paugaṇḍa age
Locative of paugaṇḍa (the age 6-10). The boys only narrate this at paugaṇḍa age though the event occurred at kaumāra. Bhāgavatam will later explain (via Parīkṣit's question) that yoga-māyā delayed the revelation by a full year.
vismitāḥ—astonished
From vi + smi-. Even the boys themselves are astonished when they finally tell the tale. The vismaya-rasa of verse 35 (Brahmā) extends to the participants. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa-līlā astonishes even those who lived through it.
This incident of Kṛṣṇa’s saving Himself and His associates from death and of giving deliverance to Aghāsura, who had assumed the form of a python, took place when Kṛṣṇa was five years old. It was disclosed in Vrajabhūmi after one year, as if it had taken place on that very day.
Purport
The word mokṣaṇam means “liberation.” For the associates of Kṛṣṇa and for Kṛṣṇa Himself, there is no question about liberation; they are already liberated, being in the spiritual world. In the material world there are birth, death, old age and disease, but in the spiritual world there are no such things because everything is eternal. As for the python, however, by the association of Kṛṣṇa and His devotees, Aghāsura also achieved the same facility of eternal life. Therefore, as indicated here by the word ātmāhi-mokṣaṇam, if the python Aghāsura could receive eternal association with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, what is to be said of those who are already associates of the Lord? Sākaṁ vijahruḥ kṛta-puṇya-puñjāḥ ( Bhāg. 10.12.11). Here is proof that God is good for everyone. Even when He kills someone, the one who is killed attains liberation. What then is to be said of those who are already in the association of the Lord?
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
This incident of Kṛṣṇa's saving Himself and His associates from death and of giving deliverance to Aghāsura, who had assumed the form of a python, took place when Kṛṣṇa was five years old. It was disclosed in Vrajabhūmi after one year, as if it had taken place on that very day.
Commentary
There was another astonishing event which you should hear about. Though Krsna performed the pastime when he was five years old (kaumara jam) the cowherd boys reported the incident when they were six years old (pauganda), but as if the incident -being freed from the mouth of the serpent--happened that day.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Thought the boys saw the liberation of the soul from Agha during Kṛṣṇa’s kaumāra period they spoke about it in Vraja at the beginning of Kṛṣṇa’s paugaṇḍa period with great astonishment.
The ending ke on paugaṇḍa indicates that the paugaṇḍa age of Kṛṣṇa had just begun. Instead of hareḥ sometimes ca asya is seen. The word ca indicates “the liberation of the snake and the celebration by the devatās.” Seeing the event of killing the snake which occurred during Kṛṣṇa’s kaumāra period, the astonished boys spoke to the people of Vraja about the snake’s death a year later during the beginning of Kṛṣṇa’s paugaṇḍa age. Another meaning is that the boys had many questions about the event of the kaumāra period, and visualizing it, spoke about the puzzlement for a year among themselves as if it were in the present. What did they see? They pointed out to each other that the ātmā was liberated from the snake (ātmāhi-mokṣaṇam) when it died, since they were not aware of Kṛṣṇa’s powers as the Lord. And later it is said:
adyānena mahā-vyālo yaśodā-nanda-sūnunā
hato ’vitā vayaṁ cāsmād iti bālā vraje jaguḥ
As the cowherd boys reached the village of Vraja, they sang, “Today Kṛṣṇa saved us by killing a great serpent!” Some of the boys described Kṛṣṇa as the son of Yaśodā, and others as the son of Nanda Mahārāja. SB 10.14.48
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Thought the boys saw the liberation of the soul from Agha during Kṛṣṇa’s kaumāra period they spoke about it in Vraja at the beginning of Kṛṣṇa’s paugaṇḍa period with great astonishment.
The killing of Aghāsura took place in the kaumāra period. The events were related to the people of Vraja and the beginning of Kṛṣṇa’s paugaṇḍa period (paugāṇḍake). Hareḥ means Kṛṣṇa who takes away death. They saw the killing of Agha and the celebration by the devatās during the kaumāra period.
His Holiness Bir Krishna Goswami· 2023-09-19· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture an event that happened when a boy was five years old — and which his friends only narrated in detail at age six, but with the freshness of yesterday. Vraja's relation to time is not linear. Kṛṣṇa's pastimes ripen in their telling, and the telling brings them present. The verse sets up Parīkṣit's question in 41.
na—notetat—thisvicitram—is wonderfulmanuja - arbha - māyinaḥ—of Kṛṣṇa, who appeared as the son of Nanda Mahārāja and Yaśodā, being compassionate upon thempara - avarāṇām—of all causes and effectsparamasya vedhasaḥ—of the supreme creatoraghaḥ api—Aghāsura alsoyat - sparśana—simply by the slight association of whomdhauta - pātakaḥ—became freed from all contamination of material existenceprāpa—became elevatedātma - sāmyam—to a body exactly resembling that of Nārāyaṇatu—butasatām sudurlabham—which is not at all possible to be obtained by contaminated souls (but everything can be possible by the mercy of the Supreme Lord) .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naitad vicitraṁ manujārbha-māyinaḥ
na
not
etat
this
vicitram
is wonderful
manuja - arbha - māyinaḥ
of Kṛṣṇa, who appeared as the son of Nanda Mahārāja and Yaśodā, being compassionate upon them
parāvarāṇāṁ paramasya vedhasaḥ
para - avarāṇām
of all causes and effects
paramasya vedhasaḥ
of the supreme creator
agho ’pi yat-sparśana-dhauta-pātakaḥ
aghaḥ api
Aghāsura also
yat - sparśana
simply by the slight association of whom
dhauta - pātakaḥ
became freed from all contamination of material existence
prāpātma-sāmyaṁ tv asatāṁ sudurlabham
prāpa
became elevated
ātma - sāmyam
to a body exactly resembling that of Nārāyaṇa
tu
but
asatām sudurlabham
which is not at all possible to be obtained by contaminated souls (but everything can be possible by the mercy of the Supreme Lord) .
Important Words
manuja-arbha-māyinaḥ—of Him who plays as a human child
Compound: manuja (human) + arbha (child) + māyin (one who wields māyā). Kṛṣṇa's humanity is a deliberate display of His yoga-māyā — not a constraint. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān is paripūrṇa-tattva; His appearance as child is svecchā-līlā.
para-avarāṇām—of higher and lower (causes)
Compound: para (higher) + avara (lower). All causes — material and spiritual — proceed from Him. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān is sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam (Brahma-saṁhitā 5.1).
yat-sparśana-dhauta-pātakaḥ—whose sins were washed away by mere contact with Him
Compound: yat (whose) + sparśana (touch) + dhauta (washed) + pātaka (sin). Touch alone cleansed Aghāsura's sins. Gauḍīyas: this is the doctrinal basis for kṛṣṇa-sparśana — physical and even imagined contact carries purifying power.
ātma-sāmyam—the form similar to His own
Compound: ātma (self) + sāmya (similarity). The technical term for sārūpya-mukti — one of the five forms of liberation, in which the liberated soul attains a form like the Lord's. Gauḍīyas distinguish sāmya (similarity) from aikya (identity); Aghāsura attains similarity, not Advaitin merger.
asatām sudurlabham—very difficult for the impure to attain
Compound: asat (impure, non-devotee) + su-durlabha (very rare). The verse stresses how exceptional Aghāsura's gift was. Gauḍīyas: this confirms the verse is not propagating universalism — Aghāsura's liberation is rare, not standard, and is given by Kṛṣṇa's exceptional mercy.
Kṛṣṇa is the cause of all causes. The causes and effects of the material world, both higher and lower, are all created by the Supreme Lord, the original controller. When Kṛṣṇa appeared as the son of Nanda Mahārāja and Yaśodā, He did so by His causeless mercy. Consequently, for Him to exhibit His unlimited opulence was not at all wonderful. Indeed, He showed such great mercy that even Aghāsura, the most sinful miscreant, was elevated to being one of His associates and achieving sārūpya-mukti, which is actually impossible for materially contaminated persons to attain.
Purport
The word māyā is also used in connection with love. Out of māyā, love, a father has affection for his child. Therefore the word māyinaḥ indicates that Kṛṣṇa, out of love, appeared as the son of Nanda Mahārāja and assumed the form of a human child ( manujārbha ). Kṛṣṇa is the cause of all causes. He is the creator of cause and effect, and He is the supreme controller. Nothing is impossible for Him. Therefore, that He enabled even a living being like Aghāsura to attain the salvation of sārūpya-mukti was not at all wonderful for Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa took pleasure in entering the mouth of Aghāsura in a sporting spirit along with His associates. Therefore, when Aghāsura, by that sporting association, as maintained in the spiritual world, was purified of all contamination, he attained sārūpya-mukti and vimukti by the grace of Kṛṣṇa. For Kṛṣṇa this was not at all wonderful.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa is the cause of all causes. The causes and effects of the material world, both higher and lower, are all created by the Supreme Lord, the original controller. When Kṛṣṇa appeared as the son of Nanda Mahārāja and Yaśodā, He did so by His causeless mercy. Consequently, for Him to exhibit His unlimited opulence was not at all wonderful. Indeed, He showed such great mercy that even Aghāsura, the most sinful miscreant, was elevated to being one of His associates and achieving sārūpya-mukti, which is actually impossible for materially contaminated persons to attain.
Commentary
The human child form of Krsna is his svarupa (manuja mayinah), for maya is well known to mean svarupa in the srutis. He is one who causes by his own free will (vedhasah) and is the supreme form among all the expansions and expansions of expansions (paravaranam). For him it is not remarkable, that Aghasura was purified of all his sins by touching him (or he was purified of his bad odor by touch). This second meaning can be taken because in Putana’s case also her body was freed of bad odor. Because Krsna and his friends used his dead body as a playground it must have been so. He also attained a similar body to Krsna (atma samyam), which was very, very rare for a demon (asatam). Sayujya is rare for the demons, and sarupya is even rarer (su durlabham), as this is reserved for the devotees.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Seeing that some people would be astonished that a greatly sinful person like Agha could get liberation, Śukadeva speaks of the Lord’s power in two verses. Nothing is astonishing for the Lord who is the best among lower and higher creatures, among all aṁśas and aṁśīs since he causes creation (vedhasaḥ). This means that he is the supreme independent being. Because of that, he was most merciful (māyinaḥ) as the son of Nanda (manujārbha). His famous, outstanding characteristic is his mercy in showing informal pastimes without reverence. Therefore this is not astonishing. The word sāmyam is sometimes replaced with sātmyam. Agha had a similar form since without a similar form the soul could not enter into Kṛṣṇa. This was not attainable by sinful people. How could such a great offender to great devotees, the boys of Gokula, get similarity to the Lord? The sinful nature was destroyed by the special power of the touch of the Lord who appears in this world by mercy independently, without considering pure or impure, in order to pay attention to the degraded state of fallen jīvas like Agha. The ātmā was not a demon. The demonic nature is a covering or upādhi. That covering was destroyed. It is not a fault of the Lord to show mercy to his faultless part. Rather it is praiseworthy since the Lord showed the highest mercy in destroying the demonic nature of Agha.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Seeing that some people would be astonished that a greatly sinful person like Agha could get liberation, Śukadeva speaks of the Lord’s power in two verses. The lord is supreme creator (parmasya vedhasaḥ) of lower and higher beings or supreme creator of cause and effect, the supreme creator of all begins in the past and future (parāvarānām). He is the supreme creator because he creates Brahmā and is the cause of all creation. Or he is the best (paramasya) of higher and lower beings because he is their creator. As the supreme lord he is supremely independent. Because of that, he was most merciful (māyinaḥ) as the son of Nanda (manujārbha). Or māyinaḥ can mean he who has wealth or beauty (mā), he who displays his unlimited wealth. Or he is merciful (māyinaḥ) to the cowherd boys (manujārbha). As a cowherd he displays his powers as the Lord. Therefore this pastime is not astonishing.
ātmā-sātmyam means he attained the same form as brahma (ātmā), nirvāṇa. Another version with ātma-sāmyam means he became situated in his svarūpa. That is stated in the Second Canto. Muktir hitvānyathā-rūpaṁ svarūpeṇa vyavsthitih: liberation means giving up false forms and being situated in one’s svarūpa. (SB .10.6)
He attained what was most rare for demons. “How could this happen for a person who offended the great devotees of Gokula?” He was purified by the touch of the Lord. By the special power of the Lord’s touch his great offense (pātakaḥ) was destroyed.
Picture a king walking into a slum and one of the slum-thieves accidentally brushing his sleeve — and the thief, instantly, becoming the king's personal companion. Aghāsura was a murderer; he ends with sārūpya — a body in the form of the Lord's own. Kṛṣṇa's mercy does not weigh credentials; it weighs contact.
Stories
Ajāmila saved by accidentally naming Nārāyaṇa
Ajāmila (SB 6.1–3) was a fallen brāhmaṇa, a thief and adulterer. At death he called out 'Nārāyaṇa' — only because that was the name of his youngest son. Yet the Viṣṇu-dūtas came and stopped the Yamadūtas; Ajāmila was given a chance for full bhakti and ultimately attained the Lord's abode.
Gauḍīyas pair Ajāmila with Aghāsura: both attained liberation through accidental, unintended contact with Bhagavān. The Bhāgavatam systematically teaches that Kṛṣṇa's name and form are independently potent — they liberate whoever they touch, intent notwithstanding.
sakṛt—once onlyyat—whoseaṅga - pratimā—the form of the Supreme Lord (there are many forms, but Kṛṣṇa is the original form)antaḥ - āhitā—placing within the core of the heart, somehow or othermanaḥ - mayī—thinking of Him even by forcebhāgavatīm—which is competent to offer devotional service to the Lorddadau—Kṛṣṇa gavegatim—the best destinationsaḥ—He (the Supreme Personality of Godhead)eva—indeednitya—alwaysātma—of all living entitiessukha - anubhūti—anyone thinking of Him immediately enjoys transcendental pleasureabhivyudasta - māyaḥ—because all illusion is completely removed by Himantaḥ - gataḥ—He is always present within the core of the hearthi—indeedkim punaḥ—what to speak .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sakṛd yad-aṅga-pratimāntar-āhitā
sakṛt
once only
yat
whose
aṅga - pratimā
the form of the Supreme Lord (there are many forms, but Kṛṣṇa is the original form)
antaḥ - āhitā
placing within the core of the heart, somehow or other
manomayī bhāgavatīṁ dadau gatim
manaḥ - mayī
thinking of Him even by force
bhāgavatīm
which is competent to offer devotional service to the Lord
dadau
Kṛṣṇa gave
gatim
the best destination
sa eva nityātma-sukhānubhūty-abhi-
saḥ
He (the Supreme Personality of Godhead)
eva
indeed
nitya
always
ātma
of all living entities
sukha - anubhūti
anyone thinking of Him immediately enjoys transcendental pleasure
abhivyudasta - māyaḥ
because all illusion is completely removed by Him
antaḥ - gataḥ
He is always present within the core of the heart
vyudasta-māyo ’ntar-gato hi kiṁ punaḥ
hi
indeed
kim punaḥ
what to speak .
Important Words
sakṛt—once
Even a single time. The keyword of nāma / smaraṇa-pravṛtti — once is enough. Gauḍīyas cite this widely: even a single sincere remembrance of Kṛṣṇa-form is salvific. Bhakti is qualitatively different from karma; no quota.
aṅga-pratimā—the form, the bodily image
Compound: aṅga (limb, body) + pratimā (image). The form of Kṛṣṇa — not an abstract idea. Gauḍīyas insist: bhakti is to His specific form, not to formlessness. Pratimā is the same word used for the worshipable mūrti.
manaḥ-mayī—consisting in the mind
Compound: manas (mind) + mayī (consisting of). The form taken into the mind — mental imaging. Gauḍīyas note: meditative form (manaḥ-mayī) is itself effective; one need not have physical access, only the mental impression.
bhāgavatīm—of Bhagavān, relating to the Lord
Feminine adjective from Bhagavān. The verse pairs bhāgavatīm with gatim (separately listed) — the technical phrase bhāgavatī-gati names the destination as Bhagavān's own abode, not impersonal mukti. Gauḍīyas: this is the prayojana of bhakti — personal entry into Vaikuṇṭha / Goloka, kṛṣṇa-prema's terminal form.
abhivyudasta-māyaḥ—remover of all illusion
Compound: abhi + vi + ud + asta (totally cast out) + māyā (illusion). 'Totally illusion-cast-out' — a strong adjective for Kṛṣṇa. Gauḍīyas: contact with Bhagavān is the only complete remedy for māyā; everything else only displaces it.
If even only once or even by force one brings the form of the Supreme Personality of Godhead into one’s mind, one can attain the supreme salvation by the mercy of Kṛṣṇa, as did Aghāsura. What then is to be said of those whose hearts the Supreme Personality of Godhead enters when He appears as an incarnation, or those who always think of the lotus feet of the Lord, who is the source of transcendental bliss for all living entities and by whom all illusion is completely removed?
Purport
The process for receiving the favor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is described here. Yat-pāda-paṅkaja-palāśa-vilāsa-bhaktyā ( Bhāg. 4.22.39 ). Simply by thinking of Kṛṣṇa, one can attain Him very easily. Kṛṣṇa is also described as having His lotus feet always within the hearts of His devotees ( bhagavān bhakta-hṛdi sthitaḥ ). In the case of Aghāsura, one may argue that he was not a devotee. The answer to this is that he thought of Kṛṣṇa for a moment with devotion. Bhaktyāham ekayā grāhyaḥ. Without devotion, one cannot think of Kṛṣṇa; and, conversely, whenever one thinks of Kṛṣṇa, one undoubtedly has devotion. Although Aghāsura’s purpose was to kill Kṛṣṇa, for a moment Aghāsura thought of Kṛṣṇa with devotion, and Kṛṣṇa and His associates wanted to sport within Aghāsura’s mouth. Similarly, Pūtanā wanted to kill Kṛṣṇa by poisoning Him, but Kṛṣṇa took her as His mother because He had accepted the milk of her breast. Svalpam apy asya dharmasya trāyate mahato bhayāt ( Bg. 2.40 ). Especially when Kṛṣṇa appears as an avatāra, anyone who thinks of Kṛṣṇa in His different incarnations ( rāmādi-mūrtiṣu kalā-niyamena tiṣṭhan ), and especially in His original form as Kṛṣṇa, attains salvation. There are many instances of this, and among them is Aghāsura, who attained the salvation of sārūpya-mukti. Therefore the process is satataṁ kīrtayanto māṁ yatantaś ca dṛḍha-vratāḥ ( Bg. 9.14 ). Those who are devotees always engage in glorifying Kṛṣṇa. Advaitam acyutam anādim ananta-rūpam: when we speak of Kṛṣṇa, we refer to all His avatāras, such as Kṛṣṇa, Govinda, Nārāyaṇa, Viṣṇu, Lord Caitanya, Kṛṣṇa-Balarāma and Śyāmasundara. One who always thinks of Kṛṣṇa must attain vimukti, special salvation as the Lord’s personal associate, not necessarily in Vṛndāvana, but at least in Vaikuṇṭha. This is called sārūpya-mukti.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
If even only once or even by force one brings the form of the Supreme Personality of Godhead into one's mind, one can attain the supreme salvation by the mercy of Kṛṣṇa, as did Aghāsura. What then is to be said of those whose hearts the Supreme Personality of Godhead enters when He appears as an incarnation, or those who always think of the lotus feet of the Lord, who is the source of transcendental bliss for all living entities and by whom all illusion is completely removed?
Commentary
This verse speaks of the cause of Aghasura gaining sarupya mukti. For Krsna whose form (anga pratima) meditated on (antarhita) by the mind (manomayi) awarded the supreme destination (bhagavati gati) to Khatvanga and others, who has directly (eva) an eternal body (nityatma), is direct perception of happiness, and destroyer of maya, who is the avatari Krsna (paramah) , who entered into the demon’s stomach (antargatah), is it so astonishing? However, in the case of Khatvanga and others, the cause of their attaining the Lord was devotion. In Aghasura however, the absence of devotion acts as a deterrent in attaining the Lord, for the Lord says, "Only by devotion can I be attained." (bhaktyaham ekaya grahya). True, that rule is there, but it is for other times.
When Krsna comes as avatara, a person can attain his abode simply by contact, because of the extra surge of his perfect krpa sakti at that time. That is why it is said: "Those who approach me in just one of the moods -lust, anger, fear, affection, oneness, friendship and devotion- certainly attain love of that nature." B. 10.29.15. "Do not think that this is astonishing for Krsna the master of yoga. He gives liberation not only to humans but also to non moving entities." (10.29.16) That Krsna gives liberation to his enemies is a remarkable quality in his completeness. He does however reward according to the mood of the person approaching him. From the statement that Aghasura’s body became the playground for the boys for many days, it should be understood, that the demon’s unfavorable attitude had been transformed into favorable attitude, and he had attained sarupya in Vaikuntha, but he did not attain a form in Vrndavana, because of his lack of that particular type of bhakti
.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
The verse shows that using the fickle the mind alone is inferior to using the deity forms made of stone or metal to produce constant vision of the Lord’s beauty. Śrīdhara Svāmī mentions Prahlāda as an example of thinking of a deity form and then placing the form forcibly in the heart. However Prahlāda had a natural tendency to make the Lord appear within, not using force. The Lord dwelling within destroys māyā by eternally being in the position to give the ātmā bliss. Or the Lord constantly gives all jīvas the experience of happiness (nityātmā-sukhānubhūti) because he completely (abhi) destroys māyā. Brahmā says atraiva māyā-dhamanāvatāre: my dear Lord, in this incarnation you have proved that you are the supreme controller of māyā. (SB 10.14.16) Yat means yaysa (whose). Another version has paramo ‘ṅga instead of antargato. He is superior (paramaḥ) to all others because he manifests his nature of unlimited qualities as Bhagavān. Aṅga is an address to Parīkṣit out of suitable joy.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-11· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a single seed flung carelessly into rich soil — and a tree growing. If even forced or accidental remembrance of Kṛṣṇa's form yields the supreme destination, then what to speak of those whose hearts He enters voluntarily? The verse is a-fortiori: if even Aghāsura was saved, the deliberate devotee is incomparably more so.
śrī - sūtaḥ uvāca—Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī spoke to the assembled saints at Naimiṣāraṇyaittham—in this waydvijāḥ—O learned brāhmaṇasyādava - deva - dattaḥ—Mahārāja Parīkṣit (or Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira), who was protected by Yādavadeva, Kṛṣṇaśrutvā—hearingsva - rātuḥ—of Kṛṣṇa, who was his savior within the womb of his mother, Uttarācaritam—the activitiesvicitram—all wonderfulpapraccha—inquiredbhūyaḥ api—even againtat eva—such activitiespuṇyam—which are always full of pious activities ( śṛṇvatāṁ sva-kathāḥ kṛṣṇaḥ puṇya-śravaṇa-kīrtanaḥ: to hear about Kṛṣṇa is always pious)vaiyāsakim—unto Śukadeva Gosvāmīyat—becausenigṛhīta - cetāḥ—Parīkṣit Mahārāja had already become steady in hearing about Kṛṣṇa .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-sūta uvāca
śrī - sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī spoke to the assembled saints at Naimiṣāraṇya
itthaṁ dvijā yādavadeva-dattaḥ
ittham
in this way
dvijāḥ
O learned brāhmaṇas
yādava - deva - dattaḥ
Mahārāja Parīkṣit (or Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira), who was protected by Yādavadeva, Kṛṣṇa
śrutvā sva-rātuś caritaṁ vicitram
śrutvā
hearing
sva - rātuḥ
of Kṛṣṇa, who was his savior within the womb of his mother, Uttarā
caritam
the activities
vicitram
all wonderful
papraccha bhūyo ’pi tad eva puṇyaṁ
papraccha
inquired
bhūyaḥ api
even again
tat eva
such activities
puṇyam
which are always full of pious activities ( śṛṇvatāṁ sva-kathāḥ kṛṣṇaḥ puṇya-śravaṇa-kīrtanaḥ: to hear about Kṛṣṇa is always pious)
vaiyāsakiṁ yan nigṛhīta-cetāḥ
vaiyāsakim
unto Śukadeva Gosvāmī
yat
because
nigṛhīta - cetāḥ
Parīkṣit Mahārāja had already become steady in hearing about Kṛṣṇa .
Important Words
sva-rātuḥ—of his own savior
Compound: sva (own) + rāt (giver, savior). 'Of his own deliverer.' Parīkṣit recognizes Kṛṣṇa as the One who saved him in the womb. Gauḍīyas: relationship-vocabulary intensifies as Bhāgavatam progresses — He is no longer 'the Lord' to Parīkṣit but 'his own savior.'
vicitram—wonderful, varied
From vi + citra (variegated). The līlā is 'multi-coloured' — full of texture. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa-līlā is constitutively vicitra; it never repeats, never bores. Each pastime is its own world.
nigṛhīta-cetāḥ—with his mind firmly absorbed
Compound: nigṛhīta (firmly held) + cetas (mind). Parīkṣit's mind is captured by the story. Gauḍīyas: this is the mark of effective śravaṇa — the mind cannot stray. Bhakti-rasa holds the cetas without effort.
puṇyam—purifying
From puṇ- (to purify). The story itself is puṇya — meritorious / purifying. Gauḍīyas: kṛṣṇa-kathā is svayaṁ-puṇya — the narrative carries its own purifying power; the listener accrues merit by listening, the speaker by speaking.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: O learned saints, the childhood pastimes of Śrī Kṛṣṇa are very wonderful. Mahārāja Parīkṣit, after hearing about those pastimes of Kṛṣṇa, who had saved him in the womb of his mother, became steady in his mind and again inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī to hear about those pious activities.
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: O learned saints, the childhood pastimes of Śrī Kṛṣṇa are very wonderful. Mahārāja Parīkṣit, after hearing about those pastimes of Kṛṣṇa, who had saved him in the womb of his mother, became steady in his mind and again inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī to hear about those pious activities.
Commentary
Parkiksit, who was given to Uttara or Yudhisthira by Krsna (yadava deva datta) hearing of the wonderful pastimes of he who gives himself to his devotees(svaratuh), whose heart was controlled by hearing those pastimes (yad nigrhita cetah) again began to ask questions to Sukadeva.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Suddenly Sūta speaks. Out of great bliss, he praises Śukadeva and Parīkṣit. Parīkṣit’s heart was afflicted (nigṛhīta) by the appearance of prema in separation from the Lord. Parīkṣit asks to hear more because the topics are most auspicious (puṇyam). Those topics were the only medicine for Śukadeva’s suffering.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
As Śukadeva was speaking (ittham), out of great enthusiasm Parīkṣit began to inquire. Parīkṣit had been given by the lord (yādava-deva) to the Pāṇdavas, after being protected from the brahmāstra. Yādava-deva indicates that he was related to the Pāṇḍavas. Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva (vaiyasikim), the son of Vyāsa, who knew the meaning of the Vedas, after hearing the most astonishing (vickitra) pastimes, because some details were unclear. After hearing he began to consider.
Parīkṣit’s heart was pained with longing (nigṛhīta) by the appearance of special prema because of hearing the pastimes. The answers would be most auspicious (puṇyam), being the medicine for his distress.
His Holiness Sacinandana Swami· 1990-06-12· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a king who was once saved as a child in the womb hearing the story of that other Child who saved Him — and being unable to hear enough. Parīkṣit's hunger for kṛṣṇa-kathā is itself the rasa Bhāgavatam means to transmit. The story does not just describe bhakti; it produces it in the listener.
Stories
Kṛṣṇa saving Parīkṣit in the womb
When Aśvatthāmā released the brahmāstra at Uttarā's womb to extinguish the Pāṇḍava line (SB 1.8.9–22), the unborn Parīkṣit was about to be incinerated. Kṛṣṇa entered the womb with His cakra and protected the child. Parīkṣit thus carries from before birth a direct experience of Kṛṣṇa as rescuer.
Gauḍīyas read 10.12.40 against this backdrop: the king who hears Aghāsura-līlā has himself been saved by the same Person. His rapt attention is not curiosity — it is recognition. The listener of Bhāgavatam is also its character.
śrī - rājā uvāca—Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquiredbrahman—O learned brāhmaṇa (Śukadeva Gosvāmī)kāla - antara - kṛtam—things done in the past, at a different time (in the kaumāra age)tat - kālīnam—described as happening now (in the paugaṇḍa age)katham bhavet—how could it be soyat—which pastimekaumāre—in the kaumāra agehari - kṛtam—was done by Kṛṣṇajaguḥ—they describedpaugaṇḍake—in the paugaṇḍa age (after one year)arbhakāḥ—all the boys .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rājovāca
śrī - rājā uvāca
Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired
brahman kālāntara-kṛtaṁ
brahman
O learned brāhmaṇa (Śukadeva Gosvāmī)
kāla - antara - kṛtam
things done in the past, at a different time (in the kaumāra age)
tat - kālīnam
described as happening now (in the paugaṇḍa age)
tat-kālīnaṁ kathaṁ bhavet
katham bhavet
how could it be so
yat kaumāre hari-kṛtaṁ
yat
which pastime
kaumāre
in the kaumāra age
hari - kṛtam
was done by Kṛṣṇa
jaguḥ paugaṇḍake ’rbhakāḥ
jaguḥ
they described
paugaṇḍake
in the paugaṇḍa age (after one year)
arbhakāḥ
all the boys .
Important Words
kāla-antara-kṛtam—done in a previous time
Compound: kāla (time) + antara (different, intervening) + kṛta (done). Done at a different time — i.e. a year ago. The very structure of the verse foregrounds the time-anomaly that will be explained in 10.13. Gauḍīyas: kāla in Kṛṣṇa-līlā is yoga-māyā-conditioned, not absolute.
kaumāre—in the kaumāra age
Locative of kaumāra (childhood, 1-5). When the act happened. Gauḍīyas: age-stratification of Kṛṣṇa's līlā is canonical — kaumāra, paugaṇḍa, kaiśora; each age has its own bhāva-prevalence.
hari-kṛtam—done by Hari
Compound: Hari (Kṛṣṇa) + kṛta (done). The act done by Hari — i.e., the killing of Aghāsura. Hari is Kṛṣṇa's general avatāra-name; here used for the boy in Vraja. Gauḍīyas: every Hari is Kṛṣṇa, but not every kṛṣṇa-līlā is performed under the Hari-mood; Vraja-Kṛṣṇa is more than Hari, He is svayam bhagavān.
paugaṇḍake arbhakāḥ—the boys in paugaṇḍa age
Compound: paugaṇḍa (age 6-10) + arbhaka (boy). 'The boys at paugaṇḍa age told.' The time-displacement is exact: act at kaumāra, telling at paugaṇḍa. Bhāgavatam tracks this carefully because the answer is doctrinal.
Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired: O great sage, how could things done in the past have been described as being done at the present? Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa performed this pastime of killing Aghāsura during His kaumāra age. How then, during His paugaṇḍa age, could the boys have described this incident as having happened recently?
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired: O great sage, how could things done in the past have been described as being done at the present? Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa performed this pastime of killing Aghāsura during His kaumāra age. How then, during His paugaṇḍa age, could the boys have described this incident as having happened recently?
Commentary
"How can past events appear as if they happened very recently? How can Krsna make the pastimes which happened when the boys were in their kaumara age (five years) appear to have happened later, when they were six years old?"
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
How could activities which occurred in the past be seen in the present time? How could the boys say that what Kṛṣṇa did in his kaumāra period was done in his paugaṇḍa period? Knowing the activities took place in the kaumāra period how could they say otherwise? How could this happen?
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
How could activities which occurred in the past be seen in the present time? That is explained. It seemed impossible. You alone know. O direct form of the Vedas (brāhmaṇa)!
Related values & verses
Concepts
BrahmanJiva
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a historian noticing a chronological seam — a story told in present-tense about an event that happened a year ago, by witnesses who were there. The seam matters. Parīkṣit, sharp listener, refuses to gloss over it. His question opens chapter 13: how did time itself behave in Vraja?
tat brūhi—therefore please explain thatme—unto memahā - yogin—O great yogīparam—very muchkautūhalam—curiosityguro—O my lord, my spiritual masternūnam—otherwiseetat—this incidenthareḥ—of the Supreme Personality of Godheadeva—indeedmāyā—the illusionbhavati—becomesna anyathā—nothing more .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad brūhi me mahā-yogin
tat brūhi
therefore please explain that
me
unto me
mahā - yogin
O great yogī
paraṁ kautūhalaṁ guro
param
very much
kautūhalam
curiosity
guro
O my lord, my spiritual master
nūnam etad dharer eva
nūnam
otherwise
etat
this incident
hareḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
eva
indeed
māyā bhavati nānyathā
māyā
the illusion
bhavati
becomes
na anyathā
nothing more .
Important Words
mahā-yogin—great yogī (Śukadeva)
Compound: mahā + yogin. Śuka is addressed as mahā-yogī — the supreme practitioner of bhakti-yoga. Gauḍīyas: Śuka is paramahaṁsa, the highest order; he is also the model śravaṇa-transmitter, the channel for Bhāgavatam to reach the world.
kautūhalam—curiosity
From kutūhala. A particular eager curiosity. Gauḍīyas: kautūhala about Kṛṣṇa-līlā is itself a positive bhāva — it draws the heart in. Parīkṣit's curiosity is not idle; it is rasa-driven.
māyā—(the Lord's) māyā
Parīkṣit pairs māyā with hareḥ earlier in the verse: hareḥ … eva māyā — 'this is Hari's māyā alone.' Gauḍīyas distinguish Kṛṣṇa's two energies: yoga-māyā (internal, līlā-arranging) and mahā-māyā (external, world-deluding). The time-displacement here is yoga-māyā's work, not deluding māyā.
na anyathā—not otherwise
Compound: na (not) + anyathā (otherwise). 'It cannot be otherwise.' Parīkṣit reasons from cause to effect: only Hari's māyā could produce such time-distortion. Gauḍīyas: the king is doing tarka in service of bhakti — reason humbled under devotion.
O greatest yogī, my spiritual master, kindly describe why this happened. I am very much curious to know about it. I think that it was nothing but another illusion due to Kṛṣṇa.
Purport
Kṛṣṇa has many potencies: parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate ( Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.8). The description of Aghāsura was disclosed after one year. Some act of Kṛṣṇa’s potency must have been involved. Therefore Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very curious to know about this, and he requested Śukadeva Gosvāmī to explain it.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
O greatest yogī, my spiritual master, kindly describe why this happened. I am very much curious to know about it. I think that it was nothing but another illusion due to Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary
Maya here means the Lord’s sakti which is expert at making the unexpected happen. Because it is here called the Lord’s maya (harer maya), it cannot mean anything else except yogamaya. The eternal associates of the Lord can fall into illusion by this energy alone.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
This causes great curiosity, O Śukadeva, endowed with the greatest bhakti (mahā-yogin)! Nothing about the Lord is unknown to you! “But this is very confidential knowledge.” O guru! Nothing should be kept secret from the disciple. He then tries to guess the truth. It was an appearance for the boys. It was created by the inconceivable power of the Lord (hareḥ). The other māyā (not his personal energy) takes away all discriminating ability. It could not be otherwise. Without his māyā it is not possible since it is not possible for the cowherd boys to be bewildered by anything else.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
How is this possible? Tell me how this happened (tat). I am eager to hear or have doubt (paraṁ kautūhalam). Or please explain this astonishing event. O master endowed with the highest bhakti (mahāyogin)! You know everything about the Lord’s actions. “This is most secret.” O instructor (guro)! You should not hide anything from the disciple. Or describe the words of the boys a year later (kautūhalam). Nūnam indicates conjecture or certainty. The word māyā hareḥ indicates that this is not the māyā which takes away all discrimination. Without your māyā this situation could not take place, for it is impossible that the cowherd boys would be put in illusion.
His Holiness Jayapataka Swami· 1984-10-01· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a student asking the teacher to please explain the trick, because the student suspects — correctly — that the trick is the entire point. Parīkṣit names yoga-māyā by another name (māyā). His humility is exemplary: he assumes he is missing something and asks. Gauḍīya śravaṇa is built on this posture.
vayam—we aredhanya - tamāḥ—most glorifiedloke—in this worldguro—O my lord, my spiritual masterapi—althoughkṣatra - bandhavaḥ—the lowest of the kṣatriyas (because we did not act like kṣatriyas )vayam—we arepibāmaḥ—drinkingmuhuḥ—alwaystvattaḥ—from youpuṇyam—piouskṛṣṇa - kathā - amṛtam—the nectar of kṛṣṇa-kathā. .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vayaṁ dhanyatamā loke
vayam
we are
dhanya - tamāḥ
most glorified
loke
in this world
guro ’pi kṣatra-bandhavaḥ
guro
O my lord, my spiritual master
api
although
kṣatra - bandhavaḥ
the lowest of the kṣatriyas (because we did not act like kṣatriyas )
vayam
we are
vayaṁ pibāmo muhus tvattaḥ
pibāmaḥ
drinking
muhuḥ
always
tvattaḥ
from you
puṇyaṁ kṛṣṇa-kathāmṛtam
puṇyam
pious
kṛṣṇa - kathā - amṛtam
the nectar of kṛṣṇa-kathā. .
Important Words
dhanya-tamāḥ—most fortunate
Compound: dhanya (fortunate) + -tama (superlative). 'Most fortunate' — Parīkṣit calls himself thus because of the chance to hear. Gauḍīyas: dhanyatā is measured by śravaṇa-access, not by wealth or rank.
kṣatra-bandhavaḥ—the lowest of kṣatriyas
Compound: kṣatra (warrior class) + bandhu (relation). 'Mere relation to the kṣatriyas' — i.e. not a real kṣatriya. A formal self-deprecation. Gauḍīyas: even Parīkṣit, the model Pāṇḍava heir, calls himself this in Śuka's presence.
kṛṣṇa-kathā-amṛtam—the nectar of Kṛṣṇa-talk
Compound: Kṛṣṇa + kathā (story, discourse) + amṛta (nectar). The technical Gauḍīya phrase. Kṛṣṇa-kathā is itself amṛta — superior to the amṛta the demigods drink (verse 13). Gauḍīyas: the Bhāgavatam itself is amṛta in this sense; reading it is drinking.
pibāmaḥ—we drink
From pā- (to drink). The verb of consumption applied to kṛṣṇa-kathā. Gauḍīyas: śravaṇa is structurally a form of drinking; the ear is the cup. Bhāgavatam 1.1 calls itself nigama-kalpa-taror galitam phalaṁ — the ripe fruit fallen from the Vedic tree.
O my lord, my spiritual master, although we are the lowest of kṣatriyas, we are glorified and benefited because we have the opportunity of always hearing from you the nectar of the pious activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Purport
The pious activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are very confidential. It is not ordinarily possible to hear such activities unless one is very, very fortunate. Parīkṣit Mahārāja placed himself as kṣatra-bandhavaḥ, which means “the lowest of the kṣatriyas. ” The qualities of the kṣatriya are described in Bhagavad-gītā, and although the general quality of the kṣatriya is īśvara-bhāva, the tendency to rule, a kṣatriya is not supposed to rule over a brāhmaṇa. Thus Mahārāja Parīkṣit regretted that he had wanted to rule over the brāhmaṇas and had therefore been cursed. He considered himself the lowest of the kṣatriyas. Dānam īśvara-bhāvaś ca kṣātraṁ karma svabhāvajam ( Bg. 18.43 ). There was no doubt that Mahārāja Parīkṣit had the good qualities of a kṣatriya, but as a devotee he presented himself, with submissiveness and humility, as the lowest of the kṣatriyas, remembering his act of wrapping a dead serpent around the neck of a brāhmaṇa. A student and disciple has the right to ask the guru about any confidential service, and it is the duty of the guru to explain these confidential matters to his disciple.
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
O my lord, my spiritual master, although we are the lowest of kṣatriyas, we are glorified and benefited because we have the opportunity of always hearing from you the nectar of the pious activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Commentary
Pariksit speaks. "O guru" This implies, "I am your student, and because of the rule ‘the guru will teach esoteric topics to the devoted student’ please tell me what should be told." His devotion is indicated by his own efforts, through the words "I drink the nectar."
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
Out of eagerness to hear, Parīkṣit encourages Śukadeva to speak. The plural is used because Parīkṣit’s friends were also included, but he also uses the plural to indicate great respect as a disciple to his guru. He calls himself the lowest of kṣatriyas out of humility. I drink constantly the topics of Kṛṣṇa made very attractive (puṇyam) since they come from you. O guru! As your disciple, I am fortunate and successful. I am even more fortunate to hear from you the sweet topics of Kṛṣṇa. I am most fortunate to hear these topics constantly.
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Satya (Truthfulness)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
His Holiness Gopal Krishna Goswami· 2010-01-08· English
Personal Guidance
Analogy
Picture a king calling himself 'the lowest of warriors' before his teacher — not from false modesty but from the recognition that even kingship is a small thing next to drinking Kṛṣṇa-kathā. Parīkṣit's self-description is the opening posture of Gauḍīya humility: dīna-bandhu first, devotee second.
Stories
Caitanya's gradation of humility
In the Śikṣāṣṭaka, Caitanya Mahāprabhu prescribed: tṛṇād api sunīcena taror api sahiṣṇunā — 'one should be more humble than a blade of grass, more tolerant than a tree.' This is not a recommendation; it is the inner shape of a Vaiṣṇava who is actually drinking kṛṣṇa-kathā.
Parīkṣit, although a cakravartī emperor, addresses Śuka as 'lowest of kṣatriyas.' Gauḍīyas read this as a textual prefiguration of Caitanya's teaching — humility increases as bhakti deepens, never the other way.
śrī - sūtaḥ uvāca—Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī saidittham—in this waysma—in the pastpṛṣṭaḥ—being inquired fromsaḥ—hetu—indeedbādarāyaṇiḥ—Śukadeva Gosvāmītat—by him (Śukadeva Gosvāmī)smārita - ananta—as soon as Lord Kṛṣṇa was rememberedhṛta—lost in ecstasyakhila - indriyaḥ—all actions of the external senseskṛcchrāt—with great difficultypunaḥ—againlabdha - bahiḥ - dṛśiḥ—having revived his external sensory perceptionśanaiḥ—slowlypratyāha—repliedtam—unto Mahārāja Parīkṣitbhāgavata - uttama - uttama—O great saintly person, greatest of all devotees (Śaunaka) .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-sūta uvāca
śrī - sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
itthaṁ sma pṛṣṭaḥ sa tu bādarāyaṇis
ittham
in this way
sma
in the past
pṛṣṭaḥ
being inquired from
saḥ
he
tu
indeed
bādarāyaṇiḥ
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
tat-smāritānanta-hṛtākhilendriyaḥ
tat
by him (Śukadeva Gosvāmī)
smārita - ananta
as soon as Lord Kṛṣṇa was remembered
hṛta
lost in ecstasy
akhila - indriyaḥ
all actions of the external senses
kṛcchrāt punar labdha-bahir-dṛśiḥ śanaiḥ
kṛcchrāt
with great difficulty
punaḥ
again
labdha - bahiḥ - dṛśiḥ
having revived his external sensory perception
śanaiḥ
slowly
pratyāha taṁ bhāgavatottamottama
pratyāha
replied
tam
unto Mahārāja Parīkṣit
bhāgavata - uttama - uttama
O great saintly person, greatest of all devotees (Śaunaka) .
Important Words
bādarāyaṇiḥ—the son of Bādarāyaṇa (Vyāsa), i.e. Śuka
Patronymic. Śuka is Vyāsa's son. Gauḍīyas: the Bhāgavatam is Vyāsa's text but Śuka's transmission. Father composes, son delivers — the disciplic pattern of paramparā encoded in Bhāgavatam's own structure.
smārita-ananta—reminded of Ananta (Kṛṣṇa)
Compound: smārita (caused to remember) + Ananta (the unlimited Lord). The mere mention of Kṛṣṇa makes Śuka remember Him. Gauḍīyas: smaraṇa is one of the nine limbs of bhakti — and for Śuka it is constant, not effortful.
hṛta-akhila-indriyaḥ—whose senses were all withdrawn
Compound: hṛta (taken away) + akhila (all) + indriya (sense). Senses fully withdrawn — samādhi-state. Gauḍīyas note: this is pratyāhāra produced not by yogic effort but by bhāva — a higher path to the same condition.
bhāgavata-uttama-uttama—the topmost of the topmost devotees
Compound: bhāgavata (devotee) + uttama (highest) twice. The repetition is emphatic: 'highest of the highest.' Sūta Gosvāmī's salutation to Parīkṣit. Gauḍīyas: the Bhāgavatam grades devotees (kaniṣṭha, madhyama, uttama, mahābhāgavata) — Parīkṣit is highest, and his question deserves the highest answer.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. Thereafter, with great difficulty, he revived his external sensory perception and began to speak to Mahārāja Parīkṣit about kṛṣṇa-kathā.
Purport
Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Tenth Canto, Twelfth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Killing of the Demon Aghāsura.”
— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Gauḍīya Ācāryas
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura
Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta Gosvāmī said: O Śaunaka, greatest of saints and devotees, when Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired from Śukadeva Gosvāmī in this way, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, immediately remembering subject matters about Kṛṣṇa within the core of his heart, externally lost contact with the actions of his senses. Thereafter, with great difficulty, he revived his external sensory perception and began to speak to Mahārāja Parīkṣit about kṛṣṇa-kathā.
Commentary
Sukadeva regained external consciousness because of the loud chanting of the Lord’s name by Narada, Vyasa and others present there, with great effort (krcchrat). Bhagavatottamottama refers to Saunaka in this verse.
Jīva Gosvāmī
Gauḍīya
Commentary
By mentioning Śukadeva as the son of Vyāsa (bādarāyaṇiḥ), his greatness is inferred. His senses were stolen by Kṛṣṇa filled with unlimited powers and the sweet pastimes-- from taking lunch on the grass to being praised by Brahmā--on remembering the question of Parīkṣit. He lost use of his senses on seeing the Lord because of his strong prema. This is the anubhāva called pramoda-moha and also called pralaya (fainting), a transformation of prema like shivering and hairs standing on end. Another version has saṁsmārita. The meaning is the same but it is not accepted by Śrīdhara Svāmī though Citsukha accepts it. He again recovered his external senses after loud kīrtana with instruments like karatālas, conches and various drums. The word “again” indicates that previously he entered such states. According to the wise, at such times Parīkṣit would repeatedly called out “O father!”There is a well known story that because of this, Parīkṣit had his son Janamejaya keep by his side all the instruments for Kṛṣṇa kīrtana. Slowly Śukadeva began speaking since he was still overcome with prema. O Śaukaka, you are the greatest among the great devotees (bhāgavatottamottama)! You are qualified to hear the most secret topics. Citsukha accepts the version bhāgavatottamottamam in the accusative case, since it is mentioned in describing Parīkṣit in the answer in the next chapter. Śrīdhara Svāmī however does not accept it. Śukadeva spoke to the Parīkṣit, the greatest of the great devotees.
Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Tenth Canto, Twelfth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled, "The Killing of the Demon Aghāsura."
10.13: The Stealing of the Boys and Calves by Brahmā
verses: Summary, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47-48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64
Chapter Summary
This chapter describes Lord Brahmā's attempt to take away the calves and cowherd boys, and it also describes the bewilderment of Lord Brahmā and finally the clearance of his illusion.
Although the incident concerning Aghāsura had been performed one year before, when the cowherd boys were five years old, when they were six years old they said, "It happened today." What happened was this. After killing Aghāsura, Kṛṣṇa, along with His associates the cowherd boys, went for a picnic within the forest. The calves, being allured by green grasses, gradually went far away, and therefore Kṛṣṇa's associates became a little agitated and wanted to bring back the calves. Kṛṣṇa, however, encouraged the boys by saying, "You take your tiffin without being agitated. I shall go find the calves." And thus the Lord departed. Then, just to examine the potency of Kṛṣṇa, Lord Brahmā took away all the calves and cowherd boys and kept them in a secluded place.
When Kṛṣṇa was unable to find the calves and boys, He could understand that this was a trick performed by Brahmā. Then the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the cause of all causes, in order to please Lord Brahmā, as well as His own associates and their mothers, expanded Himself to become the calves and boys, exactly as they were before. In this way, He discovered another pastime. A special feature of this pastime was that the mothers of the cowherd boys thus became more attached to their respective sons, and the cows became more attached to their calves. After nearly a year, Baladeva observed that all the cowherd boys and calves were expansions of Kṛṣṇa. Thus He inquired from Kṛṣṇa and was informed of what had happened.
When one full year had passed, Brahmā returned and saw that Kṛṣṇa was still engaged as usual with His friends and the calves and cows. Then Kṛṣṇa exhibited all the calves and cowherd boys as four-armed forms of Nārāyaṇa. Brahmā could then understand Kṛṣṇa's potency, and he was astonished by the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa, his worshipable Lord. Kṛṣṇa, however, bestowed His causeless mercy upon Brahmā and released him from illusion. Thus Brahmā began to offer prayers to glorify the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Related values & verses
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Guru Bhakti (Reverence for Teacher)Kritajnata (Gratitude)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Satya (Truthfulness)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Picture a sage who, the moment kṛṣṇa-kathā is requested, drops out of contact with his senses — eyes still open but no longer seeing the room, breath still moving but no longer noticing. Śuka's interior swallows his exterior when Kṛṣṇa is the subject. With effort he comes back, and begins to speak. This is the speaker the Bhāgavatam wants — and the listener it produces.
Stories
Śukadeva's birth in samādhi
Tradition (recorded across the Purāṇas and Caitanya-caritāmṛta) holds that Śukadeva was born already in spiritual realization — that he left his mother Vyāsa's house immediately, walking past Vyāsa's calls, until Vyāsa himself recited the syllables of Kṛṣṇa's name and Śuka turned. Even the sage's return to the world was conditional on hearing the name.
In 10.12.44 we see this temperament still active. The mere request for kṛṣṇa-kathā plunges Śuka into samādhi; he has to be pulled back to outer awareness with effort. Gauḍīyas: this is the standard of the ideal vaktā — one whose interior is so saturated that the topic alone is enough to absorb him.