FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Bhagavad-gītā 1.41

सङ्करो नरकायैव कुलघ्न‍ानां कुलस्य च । पतन्ति पितरो ह्येषां लुप्तपिण्डोदकक्रियाः ॥ ४१ ॥
saṅkaro narakāyaiva
[sankaro narakaayaiva]
kula-ghnānāṁ kulasya ca
[kula-ghnaanaam kulasya cha]
patanti pitaro hy eṣāṁ
[patanti pitaro hy eshaam]
lupta-piṇḍodaka-kriyāḥ
[lupta-pindodaka-kriyaah]
saṅkaraḥ — such unwanted children narakāya — make for hellish life eva — certainly kula - ghnānām — for those who are killers of the family kulasya — for the family ca — also patanti — fall down pitaraḥ — forefathers hi — certainly eṣām — of them lupta — stopped piṇḍa — of offerings of food udaka — and water kriyāḥ — performances .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saṅkaro narakāyaiva
saṅkaraḥ
such unwanted children
narakāya
make for hellish life
eva
certainly
kula-ghnānāṁ kulasya ca
kula - ghnānām
for those who are killers of the family
kulasya
for the family
ca
also
patanti pitaro hy eṣāṁ
patanti
fall down
pitaraḥ
forefathers
hi
certainly
eṣām
of them
lupta-piṇḍodaka-kriyāḥ
lupta
stopped
piṇḍa
of offerings of food
udaka
and water
kriyāḥ
performances .
  • saṅkaraḥ — such unwanted children
    *Saṅkara* repeated from v.40 — the mixed offspring of broken *varṇa* boundaries. The compound names a category of social and ritual disorder. Vyāsa is letting Arjuna develop the doctrine with technical accuracy; the diagnosis is correct, the prescription will be corrected.
  • narakāya — make for hellish life
    *Naraka* — the technical Vedic underworlds. Dative case — *for the purpose of hell*. Arjuna's eschatology is specific: family-destroyers fall into *naraka*. The Gītā will not deny *naraka* (BG 16.16 confirms it) but will redefine the path away from it — surrender to Kṛṣṇa, not abstention from duty.
  • kula - ghnānām — for those who are killers of the family
    *Kula* + *ghna* (slayer, from *han*). Genitive plural. Same *han*-root that the chapter is saturated with. Arjuna names *kula-ghna* as a class — those who *slay the family*. He is afraid of being categorized under this noun. The Gītā will teach that *not* fighting in this war is what makes one a *kula-ghna* — by allowing adharma to take over.
  • piṇḍa — offerings of food
    *Piṇḍa* — the rice-ball offered to ancestors in *śrāddha* rites. Technical Vedic ritual term. The *piṇḍa* sustains the *pitṛs* in the *pitṛ-loka*. Without the *piṇḍa*, ancestors fall. Vedic religion is a system of *vertical reciprocity* between the living and the dead; *kula-kṣaya* breaks the system.
  • udaka — offerings of water
    *Udaka* — the water libations also given in *śrāddha*. Together with the *piṇḍa*, the *udaka* makes the ancestor offering complete. The two words together name the full ritual. Arjuna's fear is technically precise: the entire *śrāddha* mechanism would lapse. The Gītā does not deny the importance of *śrāddha*; it teaches that surrender to Kṛṣṇa fulfils all such obligations at once (BG 18.66).
An increase of unwanted population certainly causes hellish life both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition. The ancestors of such corrupt families fall down, because the performances for offering them food and water are entirely stopped.
How Sanskrit scholars read this verse — split, rearranged, grammar-tagged. For the plain English distilled meaning, jump to Plain meaning below.
Auto-generated study layers — original analysis of the public-domain śloka. Review against a published edition for academic work.
Plain meaning (तात्पर्य · Tātparya)
Arjuna pushes the argument into the realm of the ancestors: with no surviving heirs to perform śrāddha (piṇḍa and udaka offerings), the pitṛs lose their place and fall. The war wounds not the living only but the dead — a cosmological calamity.
Further notes (विवरण · Vivaraṇa)
Piṇḍa-udaka-kriyā refers to the śrāddha-rites: rice-balls (piṇḍa) and water (udaka) offered to departed ancestors, indispensable for their continued elevated state in pitṛ-loka. Without performers (sons, grandsons), the offerings stop, the pitṛs 'fall' (patanti — descent from pitṛ-loka). Kula-ghna (family-destroyer) is an upapada-tatpuruṣa with the agent suffix -ghna from √hān. The compound luptapiṇḍodaka-kriyāḥ as a bahuvrīhi describes the ancestors as 'those-whose-rites-have-been-stopped.'
Prose order (अन्वय · Anvaya)
सङ्करः कुल-घ्नानां कुलस्य च नरकाय एव (भवति); लुप्त-पिण्ड-उदक-क्रियाः एषां पितरः हि पतन्ति ।
saṅkaraḥ kula-ghnānāṃ kulasya ca narakāya eva (bhavati); lupta-piṇḍa-udaka-kriyāḥ eṣāṃ pitaraḥ hi patanti |
That mixing leads only to hell for both the family-destroyers and the family; for the ancestors of these, their offerings of piṇḍa and water cut off, fall down.
Word split (पदच्छेद · Padaccheda)
सङ्करः नरकाय एव कुल-घ्नानां कुलस्य च । पतन्ति पितरः हि एषां लुप्त-पिण्ड-उदक-क्रियाः ॥
saṅkaraḥ narakāya eva kula-ghnānāṃ kulasya ca | patanti pitaraḥ hi eṣāṃ lupta-piṇḍa-udaka-kriyāḥ ||
Grammar (व्याकरण · Vyākaraṇa)
SanskritIASTGrammarMeaning
सङ्करः saṅkaraḥ सङ्कर (m.) nom.sg. (nominative singular) mixing
नरकाय narakāya नरक (m.) dat.sg. (dative singular), "to hell" (purpose-dative)
एव eva ind. (indeclinable), emphatic
कुल-घ्नानाम् kula-ghnānām कुल (n.) + घ्न (agent of √हन्) gen.pl. (genitive plural)m., upapada-tatpuruṣa of the family-destroyers
कुलस्य kulasya कुल (n.) gen.sg. (genitive singular) of the family
च ca ind. (indeclinable) and
पतन्ति patanti √पत् pres. (present) 3pl.par. (parasmaipada / active voice) they fall
पितरः pitaraḥ पितृ (m.) nom.pl. (nominative plural) ancestors
हि hi ind. (indeclinable) for, indeed
एषाम् eṣām एतद्/इदम् dem. (demonstrative) pron. (pronoun) gen.pl. (genitive plural)m. of these
लुप्त-पिण्ड-उदक-क्रियाः lupta-piṇḍa-udaka-kriyāḥ लुप्त (p.p.p. (past passive participle)) + पिण्ड (m.) + उदक (n.) + क्रिया (f.) nom.pl. (nominative plural)m., bahuvrīhi cpd. (compound) those whose piṇḍa-and-water offerings have been cut off

According to the rules and regulations of fruitive activities, there is a need to offer periodical food and water to the forefathers of the family. This offering is performed by worship of Viṣṇu, because eating the remnants of food offered to Viṣṇu can deliver one from all kinds of sinful reactions. Sometimes the forefathers may be suffering from various types of sinful reactions, and sometimes some of them cannot even acquire a gross material body and are forced to remain in subtle bodies as ghosts. Thus, when remnants of prasādam food are offered to forefathers by descendants, the forefathers are released from ghostly or other kinds of miserable life. Such help rendered to forefathers is a family tradition, and those who are not in devotional life are required to perform such rituals. One who is engaged in the devotional life is not required to perform such actions. Simply by performing devotional service, one can deliver hundreds and thousands of forefathers from all kinds of misery. It is stated in the Bhāgavatam (11.5.41) : devarṣi-bhūtāpta-nṛṇāṁ pitṝṇāṁ na kiṅkaro nāyam ṛṇī ca rājan sarvātmanā yaḥ śaraṇaṁ śaraṇyaṁ gato mukundaṁ parihṛtya kartam “Anyone who has taken shelter of the lotus feet of Mukunda, the giver of liberation, giving up all kinds of obligation, and has taken to the path in all seriousness, owes neither duties nor obligations to the demigods, sages, general living entities, family members, humankind or forefathers.” Such obligations are automatically fulfilled by performance of devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
41. Mixed caste in the family brings hell for those who have destroyed their family members. The forefathers fall, being deprived of piṇḍa and water offerings.
Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa Gauḍīya
Translation
41. Mixed caste in the family brings hell for those who have destroyed their family members. Moreover the forefathers fall to hell, being deprived of piṇḍa and water offerings.
Commentary

The mixture of caste in the family leads to hell for those who destroy the family and its traditions. Not only do they go to hell, but because of this (hi indicates “reason”) the ancestors of the family (pitaraḥ) also fall to hell because of being deprived of the piṇḍa offerings from lack of sons who are qualified givers of piṇḍa.

Bhūrijana Dāsa Gauḍīya
Translation
An increase of unwanted population certainly causes hellish life both for the family and for those who destroy the family tradition. The ancestors of such corrupt families fall down, because the performances for offering them food and water are entirely stopped. (cn/DS) Even Lord Caitanya offered 'sraddha' ceremony for His father in Gaya. We can't think that this is just superficial, that we are vaisnavas, that is not important to perform these things. This is very important for the entire culture. The ancestors are dependent on these types of sacrifices to become free from all types of sufferings.
Gauranga Priya Dāsa Study
Bhakti-śāstrī Notes, ISKCON Chowpatty (2009)
Theme

COMMON THEME: Fighting will cause family destruction in the following 6-step sequence:

1. Death of Elderly (1.39)

Fighting destroys the whole dynasty

2. Family Traditions Stop: Irreligion increases (1.39)

With the destruction of dynasty, the entire family tradition is vanquished, and thus the rest of the family becomes involved in irreligion

3. Women polluted (1.40)

When irreligion is prominent, the women in the family become polluted
Chanakya Pandit says “Women need protection”
Why women need special protection – Because they are
Less intelligent
Not trustworthy
Prone to degradation
How they are protected – By engaging in religious principles, either under father, husband or son
If they are not protected, it leads to adultery and varna-sankara

4. Varna-sankara (unwanted progeny) (1.40*)

From degradation of woman comes unwanted progeny
Varna-sankara has three effects
Risk of war and pestilence
Hellish life
For the whole family – Ancestors falldown because pinda-dana stops

▪

For those who destroy family

All community projects and family welfare acts stop

5. Hellish life for ‘family’ and ‘destroyers of family’ (1.41*)

6. Culture is destroyed – Community projects and family welfare acts stop (1.42)

Focus of Learning

(c) Correct understanding about forgiveness / saintliness

Saintliness is not justified for a ksatriya
Compared to “Rama-rajya” – Lord Rama gave sufficient lessons to Ravana who was an aggressor because he kidnapped Rama’s wife, Mother Sita

(d) ‘Madhava’ – Arjuna addresses Krishna as ‘Madhava’ to indicate:

Krishna is the husband of the Goddess of ‘fortune’
Krishna should not cause an action which brings ‘misfortune’

(e) Saintliness of Arjuna – Arjuna’s thorough consideration of evil consequences reveals saintliness

(1.37 – 1.38)

Obligation (To not refuse when challenged to battle or gamble) is binding when the effect is good, not otherwise
Therefore Arjuna considered that he is not obliged to fight
ARJUNA’S FIFTH ARGUMENT — “INDECISION”

FIFTH ARGUMENT COVERED IN CHAPTER 2:

Please refer to Text 2.6 for Arjuna’s fifth argument

PLEASE NOTE: Some points of the purport are covered in the ‘6-step sequence of family destruction’

theme above

(a) Varnashrama Institution (1.39 purport) – Principles of religious traditions to help members of

family grow and attain spiritual values

(b) Role of elders (1.39 purport)

Responsible for maintaining purificatory samskaras (birth to death)
Helping younger generation on the path of salvation

(c) Importance of good population (1.40 purport) – It is the basic principle for peace, prosperity and

spiritual progress in life

(d) What good population depends on (1.40 purport) – Chastity and faithfulness of womanhood

(e) Philosophy of Pinda-Dan (1.41 purport)

Based on rules and regulations of fruitive acts
What it is – To offer periodical food and water to forefathers
Right process – worship of Vishnu done / remnants offered to forefathers
Principle: To release them from many sinful reactions / ghostly existence etc.
Who is not obliged for this – One in devotional life
Why devotees are not obliged – Because devotional service relieves hundreds and thousands of forefathers from all misery (Ref. SB. 11.5.41 “devarsi bhutapta…”)

(f) Community projects and family welfare acts – Importance (1.42 purport)

They are set forth by Varnashrama / Sanatana-dharma
Sets duties for four orders of society
Purpose – To help attain ultimate salvation
‘Result of breaking’ such projects
Chaos in society
People forget ultimate aim of life – Vishnu

(g) Ways of receiving real knowledge (1.43 purport) – Disciplic succession

Arjuna based his arguments not on personal experience, but on what he has heard from authorities

(h) Principle of ‘Prayascitta’ (1.43 purport) – A system in the varnashrama system by which before

death one has to undergo the process of atonement for his sinful activities

Without doing so, one surely will be transferred to the hellish planets to undergo miserable lives
Śrī Śaṅkarācārya Classical
Translation
1.41 Sri Sankaracharya did not comment on this sloka. The commentary starts from 2.10.
Śrī Rāmānujācārya Classical
Translation
1.26 - 1.47 Arjuna said - Sanjaya said Sanjaya continued: The high-minded Arjuna, extremely kind, deeply friendly, and supremely righteous, having brothers like himself, though repeatedly deceived by the treacherous attempts of your people like burning in the lac-house etc., and therefore fit to be killed by him with the help of the Supreme Person, nevertheless said, 'I will not fight.' He felt weak, overcome as he was by his love and extreme compassion for his relatives. He was also filled with fear, not knowing what was righteous and what unrighteous. His mind was tortured by grief, because of the thought of future separation from his relations. So he threw away his bow and arrow and sat on the chariot as if to fast to death.
Śrī Abhinavagupta Classical
Translation
1.35 1.44 Nihatya etc. upto anususruma. Sin alone is the agent in the act of slaying these desperadoes. Therefore here the idea is this : These ememies of ours have been slain, i.e., have been take possession of, by sin. Sin would come to us also after slaying them. Sin in this context is the disregard, on account of greed etc., to the injurious conseences like the ruination of the family and the like. That is why Arjuna makes a specific mention of the [ruin of the] family etc., and of its duties in the passage 'How by slaying my own kinsmen etc'. The act of slaying, undertaken with an individualizing idea about its result, and with a particularizing idea about the person to be slain, is a great sin. To say this very thing precisely and to indicate the intensity of his own agony, Arjuna says only to himself [see next sloka]:
Swami Sivananda Classical
Translation
1.41. By the prevalence of impiety, O Krishna, the women of the family become corrupt; and , women being corrupted, O Varshenya (descendant of Vrishni), there arises intermingling of castes.
Commentary

1.41 अधर्माभिभवात् from the prevalence of impiety? कृष्ण O Krishna? प्रदुष्यन्ति become corrupt? कुलस्त्रियः the women of the family? स्त्रीषु in women? दुष्टासु (being) corrupt? वार्ष्णेय O Varshneya? जायते arises? वर्णसङ्करः casteadmixture.No Commentary.

Swami Gambhīrānanda Classical
Translation
1.41 O Krsna, when vice predominates, the women of the family become corrupt. O descendent of the Vrsnis, when women become corrupted, it results in the intermingling of castes.
Shri Purohit Swami Classical
Translation
1.41 When irreligion spreads, the women of the house begin to stray; when they lose their purity, adulteration of the stock follows.
Related values
Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Abhaya (Fearlessness)
Related verses
BG 1.40 BG 1.42 BG 3.24 SB 1.9.26 SB 12.2.3 SB 4.21.21 CC Madhya 22.130 CC Adi 3.77 CC Madhya 15.110 Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.5.16Taittirīya Upaniṣad 1.11.2
When dharma weakens, women — and the values associated with the feminine principle — suffer first; protect the conditions that allow purity and dignity.
Practical Applications
  • Examine how your home and community honor the feminine in its full spiritual dignity.
  • Resist cultural currents that reduce women (or any soul) to objects of exploitation.
  • Speak up when conversations or media in your circle degrade the feminine principle.
Reflection Questions
  • What does my environment communicate to the women in it about their spiritual worth?
  • Where do I tolerate cultural degradation that I should refuse?

When the rituals that link the living to the ancestors are interrupted, the dead drift. The Vedic worldview is dense with downward causation: the *piṇḍa* and *udaka* offerings sustain the *pitṛs*. A society that forgets its ritual obligations starves its own forebears.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 1