Bhagavad-gītā 17.11
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
aphala - ākāṅkṣibhiḥ
—
by those devoid of desire for result
Compound: a- (not) + phala (fruit) + ākāṅkṣin (one who longs for). The hinge condition. Sattvic sacrifice is not defined by what is offered but by what is *not* expected back. Same fire, same mantras — but if phala-ākāṅkṣā enters, the mode shifts.
-
vidhi - diṣṭaḥ
—
according to the direction of scripture
Compound: vidhi (rule) + diṣṭa (pointed out, prescribed). The second condition. Sattva requires not just renunciation but obedience — sacrifice performed where śāstra has pointed.
-
yaṣṭavyam
—
must be performed
Future passive participle of √yaj — 'that which is to be sacrificed/done.' Combined in the verse with eva, it becomes the karma-yoga sūtra: 'simply to be done.' The whole detachment teaching compressed into one word — duty as duty, no further justification sought.
-
samādhāya
—
fixing
Gerund from sam + ā + √dhā — to place together, to compose. The same root as samādhi. The verse uses it with manaḥ: the mind must be 'composed.' Sāttvika-yajña requires not just bodily correctness and renounced desire but the mind's collected fixity.
-
sāttvikaḥ
—
in the mode of goodness
The masculine form here qualifies yajñaḥ (sacrifice). Note the chapter's careful grammar: when a sacrifice is sāttvika, the word takes masculine; when austerity is sāttvika, it takes neuter (sāttvikam). The classification follows the noun, not the mode.
Plain meaning (तात्पर्य · Tātparya)
Further notes (विवरण · Vivaraṇa)
Prose order (अन्वय · Anvaya)
Word split (पदच्छेद · Padaccheda)
Grammar (व्याकरण · Vyākaraṇa)
| Sanskrit | IAST | Grammar | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| अफल-आकाङ्क्षिभिः | aphala-ākāṅkṣibhiḥ | अ- + फल (n.) + आकाङ्क्षिन् (adj.) ins.pl. (instrumental plural)m., tatpuruṣa cpd. (compound) | by those not desiring fruit |
| यज्ञः | yajñaḥ | यज्ञ (m.) nom.sg. (nominative singular) | sacrifice |
| विधि-दिष्टः | vidhi-diṣṭaḥ | विधि (m.) + दिष्ट p.p.p. (past passive participle) nom.sg. (nominative singular)m., tatpuruṣa cpd. (compound) | prescribed by scriptural injunction |
| यः | yaḥ | यद् (rel. pron. (pronoun)) nom.sg. (nominative singular)m. | which |
| इज्यते | ijyate | √यज् pass. (passive) pres. (present) 3sg. | is performed/offered |
| यष्टव्यम् | yaṣṭavyam | √यज् gerundive (kṛtya) nom.sg. (nominative singular)n. | ought to be offered |
| एव | eva | ind. (indeclinable), emphatic | simply, just |
| इति | iti | ind. (indeclinable), quotative | thus, with this conviction |
| मनः | manaḥ | मनस् (n.) acc.sg. (accusative singular) | the mind |
| समाधाय | samādhāya | सम् + आ + √धा abs. (absolutive) | having fixed/settled |
| सः | saḥ | तद् (dem. (demonstrative) pron. (pronoun)) nom.sg. (nominative singular)m. | that |
| सात्त्विकः | sāttvikaḥ | सात्त्विक (adj.) nom.sg. (nominative singular)m. | of the mode of goodness |
The general tendency is to offer sacrifice with some purpose in mind, but here it is stated that sacrifice should be performed without any such desire. It should be done as a matter of duty. Take, for example, the performance of rituals in temples or in churches. Generally they are performed with the purpose of material benefit, but that is not in the mode of goodness. One should go to a temple or church as a matter of duty, offer respect to the Supreme Personality of Godhead and offer flowers and eatables without any purpose of obtaining material benefit. Everyone thinks that there is no use in going to the temple just to worship God. But worship for economic benefit is not recommended in the scriptural injunctions. One should go simply to offer respect to the Deity. That will place one in the mode of goodness. It is the duty of every civilized man to obey the injunctions of the scriptures and offer respect to the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
With this verse the Lord begins to speak of the three types of sacrifice. That is sattvic sacrifice which is performed according to the rules, with no desire for results. What would be the impetus for sacrifice if there were no desire for results? The mind is fixed in performing the sacrifice with the idea that it should be done because the scriptures prescribe it thus (yaṣṭavyam eva iti).
The Lord then speaks of three varieties of sacrifice in three verses. That sacrifice which is performed (ījyate) without desire for results, arising from the rules of scripture (vidhi dṛṣṭaḥ) is sacrifice in the mode of goodness. But how would one be inspired to do a sacrifice without some motive? One should concentrate the mind (samādhāya), thinking “This sacifice should be done because of instructions in the Vedas (yaṣṭavaym) directed to me. It is not to be done for achieving results.”
Sacrifice in the mode of goodness
17.11 अफलाकाङ्क्षिभिः by men desiring no fruit? यज्ञः sacrifice? विधिदृष्टः as enjoined by the ordinance? यः which? इज्यते is offered? यष्टव्यम् ought to be offered? एव only? इति thus? मनः the mind? समाधाय having fixed? सः that? सात्त्विकः Sattvic or pure.Commentary When a sacrifice is done with all due Sattvic rites? faith and devotion? without the least taint of desire for reward? with the mind fixed on the sacrifice only? for its own sake (for the,sake of discharging the duty only)? then it is said to be pure in its nature. Here the sacrifice is done in a disinterested spirit or with an attitude of desirelessness (Nishkamya Bhava) as an auxiliary to the attainment of the knowledge of the Self. Such selfless and desireless actions purify the mind and prepare the aspirant for the reception of divine light or knowledge of the Self. The Sattvic nature of a man forces him to do such selfless and desireless sacrifices. He does not care even for his own emancipation. He performs them with the firm belief that they ought to be done. He does them with the firm resolve that sacrifice is a duty.Yajna here is not limited to the ceremonial sacrifice. It is used in a broad sense. Any unselfish action done without attachment? without agency or egoism and without expectation of reward? as an offering unto the Lord? is a Yajna or sacrifice.
- BG 17 11-13 - Nityananda Charan Prabhu - ISKCON Chowpatty 2010-02-05
- BG 17 11-13 - Sridhar Swami - Ljubljana 2002-01-25
- BG 17 11-14 - Chaitanya Charan Prabhu.MP3
- BG 17 11-19 - Chaitanya Charan Prabhu - Pune 2013-05-05.MP3
- BG 17 11-28 - Purnachandra Swami - Vrindavan
- BG 17 11 - Karunamayi Mataji - ISKCON Radhadesh 2011-06-21
- BG 17 11 - Vrajanandana Swami - ISKCON Tirupati 2009-03-22
- Priya Valabha Mataji BG 17-11-13 Hindi
- Balaram Shakti Pr BG 17-11-22 - 2020
- Balaram Shakti Pr BG 17-11-16
- Chaitanya Charan Pr BG 17-11-19 - Applying the principles of austerity in our life - 2013-05-05 Pune
- Jitamitra Pr Hindi Comments - BG 17-11 - 2016-01-27 EOK
- Rasika Govinda Pr BG 17-11 Tamil - 2018-04-22
- Sarvabhauma Pr Hindi BG 17-11 - Onward - 2020
- Satya Gopinath Pr BG 17-11 Telugu - 2010-03-25 ISKCON Tirupati
- Shubha Krishna Pr BG 17-11-13 Hindi
- VRP BG 17-11-28 18-01-10 Hindi - 2018-02-21 Ahmedabad
- VRP Bhakti Shastri - BG 17-11-28 - Ahmedabad
- VRP Bhakti Shastri Hindi - BG 17-11-22 - 2019-11-24 Ahmedabad
- Bhakti Vikas Sw BG 17-11-13 - Sacrifices are not meant to go to heavenly planets
- Sridhar Sw BG 17-11-13 - Sacrifice and charity - Ljubljana 2002-01-25
- Sukadeva Sw Telugu BG 17-11
- Treat your sacrifices (worship, service) as duty without reward expectation.
- Honor scripture's specifications.
- Refuse the bargain mode.
- Where has my worship slipped into bargaining?
- What restores duty-without-reward?
Sattvic yajña is like a tree planted not for its shade but because the tree is dharmic to plant. The shade comes — or does not — and the planter is unmoved. The act stands on its own duty-feet, asking nothing back from the soil.
After becoming emperor, Yudhiṣṭhira performed the Rājasūya sacrifice not for fame, not to consolidate power, but because Kṛṣṇa and Vyāsa instructed it as the proper duty of his station. He performed it strictly according to vidhi, with Kṛṣṇa Himself attending — and Yudhiṣṭhira's mind was so fixed on duty rather than reward that he gave away the kingdom's wealth without flinching.
Mahābhārata records that Yudhiṣṭhira treated the sacrifice as yaṣṭavyam eva — 'this is simply to be performed' — exactly the phrase Kṛṣṇa uses in this verse. It became the canonical example of sāttvika-yajña.
My note
Source: vedabase.io