FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

9.7 · The Descendants of King Māndhātā

24 verses
R Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (19158 chars)

R – Ramacandra (6-13) The most famous king in the Surya dynasty was Lord Ramacandra, who was ideal in all respects – as a king, as a son, as a husband and as a disciple. His glorious pastimes are recounted in the Ramayana, which has been recited for generations. Srimad-Bhagavatam summarises those extraordinary narrations: the alliance with Hanuman and the monkey army, the building of a bridge to Lanka, the rescue of Sitadevi from the clutches of Ravana, and the establishment of Rama-rajya (Rama’s ideal rulership), where every citizen had their material and spiritual needs perfectly catered for.

Previous Succession Next Saubhari Muni Last updated 1 year ago

R – Ramacandra (6-13)

R – Ramacandra (6-13) The most famous king in the Surya dynasty was Lord Ramacandra, who was ideal in all respects – as a king, as a son, as a husband and as a disciple. His glorious pastimes are recounted in the Ramayana, which has been recited for generations. Srimad-Bhagavatam summarises those extraordinary narrations: the alliance with Hanuman and the monkey army, the building of a bridge to Lanka, the rescue of Sitadevi from the clutches of Ravana, and the establishment of Rama-rajya (Rama’s ideal rulership), where every citizen had their material and spiritual needs perfectly catered for.

Previous Succession Next Saubhari Muni Last updated 1 year ago

Dynasties of Iksvaku

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Dynasties of Iksvaku Chapter 12, 13 Sukadeva Goswami then described the dynasty of Kusa, Lord Rama’s son. He also elaborated on the dynasty of Nimi, who was another of Iksvaku’s sons. When Nimi wanted to perform a sacrifice, he requested the presence of his spiritual master, Vasistha. Since Vasistha was engaged elsewhere, he instructed Nimi to wait for him to return. Nimi, however, considered that life was very short, so he went ahead anyway. When Vasistha discovered this, he cursed his disciple to die. Nimi then counter-cursed his spiritual master to suffer the same fate! Vasistha took birth again, but when the priests tried to revive Nimi he refused, not wanting to be materially encaged again. Instead, the sages churned Nimi’s body, and as a result, Janaka, father of Udavasu, was born. Sukadeva Goswami then described the rest of the dynasty.

Previous Ramacandra’s Reign Next Purusottama Last updated 1 year ago

Other Descendants

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Other Descendants Chapter 7, 8, 9 Sukadeva Goswami listed more descendants of King Mandhata, again pausing to elaborate on certain personalities. Trisanku : Several generations after Mandhata came Trisanku, who kidnapped a lady who was soon to be married. For this act, his father angrily cursed him to become a dog-eater ( candala ). With Visvamitra’s help, however, Trisanku received elevation to the heavenly planets. Later, the demigods forced him to fall, and he thus began his descent, though Visvamitra’s powerful intervention meant he didn’t drop all the way down. Hariscandra : After successfully worshipping Varuna to get a son, Hariscandra, Trisanku’s son, repeatedly avoided his promise to offer the son as a sacrifice in return. Hariscandra was then attacked by disease, though his son, Rohita, resolved the whole situation by purchasing another boy and offering him for the Varuna-yajna. Hariscandra was freed from his disease and ultimately freed from the entanglement of material life. Bahuka : In the lineage of Rohita was Bahuka, who had adopted residence in the forest and eventually died there. Though his wife wanted to enter the funeral pyre with him, the sage Aurva forbade her since she was pregnant. The co-wives of Bahuka tried to poison her, but she nevertheless had a son named Sagara (“one born with poison”). Sagara : Under his rulership many uncivilised clans were reformed. When he attempted to perform a horse sacrifice ( asvamedha yajna ), Indra stole the horse, and Sagara’s sons went looking for it. They dug up the earth and formed a trench which became known as the Sagara ocean. When they falsely accused Kapiladeva of stealing the horse, their offensive allegations caused them to be burned to ashes. Amsuman : This grandson of Sagara was instructed in spiritual knowledge by Lord Kapiladeva and later retrieved the horse. Sagara then performed the sacrifices with that horse. Both Amsuman and Dilipa, his son, were unsuccessful in bringing the Ganges to the Earth. Bhagiratha : Dilipa’s son underwent severe austerities to invite Ganga to the earth. When Gangadevi appeared, he humbly submitted his request. She agreed, but had some reservations. Bhagiratha mitigated them by convincing Siva to bear the force of her descent, and by arranging that pure devotees who enter the Ganga would remove all the stored sins of materialistic bathers. Later, the sons of Sagara, whose bodies had been burnt up, were elevated by being sprinkled with Ganges water. Saudasa : In Bhagiratha’s line was Saudasa, who once killed a man-eater. Seeking revenge, the man-eater’s brother became the cook at Saudasa’s palace and served meat to Vasistha, the spiritual master of the King. Vasistha thus cursed Saudasa to become a man-eater, and in that life he indeed killed a brahmana who was about to impregnate his wife. Saudasa was thus cursed to die if he ever engaged in the sexual act. After being released from the Raksasa curse, he still couldn’t impregnate his wife, Madayanti, and thus allowed Vasistha Muni to give her a child. Khatvanga : Further in the lineage came the great King Khatvanga. When he pleased the demigods by assisting them to defeat the demons, they offered him a benediction. He wisely enquired how long he would live for, and when he discovered he was on the brink of death, he fixed his mind on the Lord and attained perfection.

Previous Saubhari Muni Next Ramacandra’s Pastimes Last updated 1 year ago

Purusottama

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama “We should not accept any rascal as God or an incarnation of God, for God displays special features in His various activities. Therefore, the Lord Himself says in Bhagavad-gita ( 4.9 ): “One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna.” The activities of the Lord are not common; they are all transcendentally wonderful and not able to be performed by any other living being. The symptoms of the Lord’s activities are all mentioned in the sastras, and after one understands them one can accept the Lord as He is.” ( SB 9.10.15 ) To prove His Supreme identity, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu exhibited His six-armed form known as the Sadbhuja-rupa on multiple occasions. The form displays the two arms of Rama (holding the bow and arrow), the two arms of Krishna (holding the flute) and the two arms of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (holding the staff and waterpot). The Supreme Person (Purusottama) thus assumes different identities, each with a specific purpose and mood. Krishna is known as Lila-Purusottama – the form of the Lord who attracts the world by displaying profoundly sweet and intimate pastimes with His devotees. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is known as Prema-Purusottama - the form of the Lord who embodies and freely distributes the wonderful gift of pure love of Godhead to the entire world. Ramacandra is known as Maryada-Purusottama – the form of the Lord who establishes the ideal example for the world to follow. He was the ideal person, the ideal husband, the ideal ruler and the ideal follower of Vedic culture and etiquette in all respects. In Canto Eleven, Narada Muni recites an exquisite verse which depicts the Sadbhuja-rupa. When translated in different ways, the Sanskrit text simultaneously describes Lord Rama, Lord Krishna and Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu: tyaktva su-dustyaja-surepsita-rajya-laksmim dharmistha arya-vacasa yad agad aranyam maya-mrgam dayitayepsitam anvadhavad vande maha-purusa te caranaravindam ( SB 11.5.34 ) Lord Krishna – “O Maha Purusa, you gave up the opulence of Mathura which is desired even by demigods. To obey the loving order of Vasudeva and Devaki, You went to the forest village of Vrindavana. Due to the inconceivable love of Srimati Radharani, You become easily controlled by Her just like ‘a toy animal.’ You run here and there in Vrindavana, protecting the cows, playing with your friends and engaging in countless intrigues of love with Srimati Radharani and the gopis, tightly under the control of their love.” Lord Chaitanya – “O Maha Purusa, I worship Your lotus feet. You accepted sannyasa and gave up the association of the goddess of fortune and all her opulence, which is most difficult to renounce and is hankered after by even the great demigods. Being the most faithful follower of the path of religion, You thus left for the forest in obedience to a brahmana’s curse. Out of sheer mercifulness You chased after the fallen conditioned souls, who are always in pursuit of the false enjoyment of illusion, and at the same time engaged in searching out Your own desired object, Lord Syamasundara.” Lord Ramacandra – “O Maha Purusa, you gave up the Kingdom of Ayodhya, which was very opulent, difficult to renounce and hankered after by even great demigods. By the order of Maharaja Dasaratha, who was just like Your guru, You gave up everything and went to the forest. There You exhibited Your great affection for mother Sita and chased after the golden deer, which was especially desired by Srimati Sitadevi.” Rama demonstrated how to live according to dharma : right action or sacred duty according to one’s occupation and social situation. Indeed, His entire life was a demonstration of selflessness, nobility of spirit and being prepared to sacrifice one’s own comfort for a higher cause.

Previous Dynasties of Iksvaku Next Being Exemplary Last updated 1 year ago

Banishing Sita

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama Banishing Sita Perhaps the most bewildering of Rama’s acts was to banish Sita after rescuing her from the grips of Ravana. If Lord Rama’s descent was to set the ideal example, how do we justify such a (seemingly) harsh, cruel and immoral act? Sitadevi was pure, chaste, untouched and completely innocent, and to exile her because of nonsensical rumours seems unforgivable. In order to understand this, we have to look at the practical reality, the principle involved and the deeper purpose of the Lord. [ 28 ] Practical – Sitadevi wasn’t cruelly exiled with no means of survival, but rather given a suitable living situation where she would be fully protected. She was carefully placed under the care of Valmiki Rishi and female hermits within the kingdom of Ayodhya. But why was she banished from the palace? Principle – while navigating life we are often confronted with a conflict of principles. It’s an art to expertly respond and resolve such dilemmas. As an ideal husband, Ramacandra had a duty to care for His chaste wife. As a king, Ramacandra had the responsibility of being spotless and free from any suspicion or character flaw. He expertly balanced both principles by ensuring Sita’s protection, and simultaneously exhibiting the detachment required of a king, thus setting the shining example for all future leaders. But why did the innocent Sita have to suffer? Purpose – the profound purpose and inner meaning behind this episode is to facilitate and intensify the exchange of spiritual emotions between the Lord and His consort. Love is intensified in separation. We find this in the pastimes of Krishna, in the pastimes of Sri Chaitanya and here in the pastimes of Lord Rama. What externally looks like a hard-hearted act, is actually a trigger for invoking a deep, sweet internal yearning. The entire incident also highlights the incredible love of Sita, which was unfailing in all circumstances. Despite being rejected by her beloved, her faithfulness remained as strong as ever – love tested is love triumphant.

Previous Being Exemplary Next A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Last updated 1 year ago

Being Exemplary

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Purusottama Being Exemplary Lord Rama’s life is detailed in the ancient Sanskrit epic, Ramayana. The history contains 24,000 verses, and fully describes the activities of Lord Rama and the lessons relevant for our lives today. The story is told in response to sage Valmiki’s question to Narada Muni: “Who is an ideal man?” Narada’s answer, a brief description of the life and qualities of Lord Rama, forms the basis for Valmiki’s much longer epic. This beautiful teaching of being ideal and exemplary is central to the development of spirituality. When Srila Prabhupada was once asked, “How do you recognise a Vaisnava?” his answer was simple but profound: “A Vaisnava is a perfect gentleman.” Just as the Srimad-Bhagavatam is known as amala-purana , the spotless book, the true follower is known as amala-bhakta , the spotless devotee. One famous propagandist used to say that you can cheat some people for all time and you can cheat all people for some time, but you can’t cheat all people for all time. If one is lacking in integrity and character, sooner or later it will be exposed. In the material world, people are remembered for what they do – their ground-breaking achievements, their high-ranking positions of responsibility and their impactful influence on the world. In spiritual circles, however, people are remembered for who they are . In some cases, the most outstanding spiritualists made a visible mark on the world and were famed for it, but in many cases they were quiet, simple, humble souls who went about their daily life with a deep sense of devotion, sensitivity and saintliness, their consciousness merged in transcendence. They were unassuming, and quite often went unnoticed. The value system in spiritual circles is entirely different: it’s character over capability. The spotless and exemplary character of saintly personalities is an unending source of instruction and inspiration. They are never found to be duplicitous or superficial, but ever-preaching the highest ideals of human life and simultaneously walking the talk. A recent survey showed that over 70% of first- time attendants to a spiritual movement never return. Why? Primarily because they observe a huge gap between the ideals of the philosophy and the behaviour of its adherents. Thus, we may consider that being exemplary in conduct is a core aspect of any aspiring spiritualist’s life, and indeed a very special contribution to the world. Being exemplary is a service which is universal (everyone can do it), powerful (everyone will appreciate it), perpetual (can never be taken away by anyone) and flexible (can be done in any time, place or circumstance).

Previous Purusottama Next Banishing Sita Last updated 1 year ago

Ramacandra’s Pastimes

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Ramacandra’s Pastimes Chapter 10 Sukadeva Goswami’s description of Iksvaku’s dynasty eventually reached Dasaratha, the father of Lord Rama. The great sage then narrated all the key events in Lord Rama’s life. On the request of Visvamitra, Rama assisted in killing many demons even though He was still relatively young. Later, He won the hand of Sita in Mithila, doing what no other warrior could do. During the return journey, Ramacandra defeated the mighty Parasurama, who had annihilated the ksatriya race. Back in Ayodhya, everything was very auspicious, until the news arrived that Dasaratha had been asked to banish Rama from the kingdom. To honour his father, Rama readily agreed and left all opulence behind to accept a life of hardship in the forest. While wandering in exile, Rama, Sita and Laksman encountered a variety of situations. When Ravana’s sister, Surpanakha, approached Rama with lusty desires, Laksman cut her nose off. This led to the killing of Khara and Dusana who had launched an attack in retaliation. Later, the tragic kidnapping of Sita took place, and the bravery of Jatayu was witnessed as he attempted to intercept the mighty Ravana, though he lost his life in the process. To rescue his beloved consort, Rama established an alliance with the monkeys, who expertly tracked her down. In an epic scene, Rama and the monkey army built a bridge to Lanka and laid siege on the demons who had kidnapped the goddess of fortune. After a raging battle, Ravana was defeated and killed, and Sita was rescued from the Asoka grove. Rama installed the devoted Vibhisana as King of Lanka, while He himself returned to Ayodhya accompanied by His dearest associates. Bharata, who had been ruling in His absence, heartily welcomed Rama, who was finally reunited with his mothers, family members and loyal subjects. Rama was duly coronated as the King, and His reign was celebrated as the ideal exhibition of royal rule ( rama-rajya ).

Previous Other Descendants Next Ramacandra’s Reign Last updated 1 year ago

Ramacandra’s Reign

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Ramacandra’s Reign Chapter 11 Ramacandra conducted His affairs with the highest principles, and thus there was incredible opulence and abundant prosperity in the kingdom. He would give personal time to the citizens and ensure all governmental affairs were concluded smoothly. Ramacandra would send spies around the capital and wander incognito Himself to gauge the impression the citizens had of Him. He wanted this feedback in order to maintain the love and trust of His subjects. One night, He heard a man criticising Him for accepting Sitadevi back after she had been in another man’s house. Fearing the concerns and doubts that people may have about his character, He decided to leave His pregnant wife. Everyone was shocked and distraught! Sitadevi took shelter of Valmiki’s asrama , where she gave birth to Lava and Kusa. When Sitadevi eventually left the world, the aggrieved Rama performed austerities for 13,000 years. The Supreme Lord then wound up His pastimes and left the world.

Previous Ramacandra’s Pastimes Next Dynasties of Iksvaku Last updated 1 year ago

Saubhari Muni

R – Ramacandra (6-13) Saubhari Muni Chapter 6 Sukadeva Goswami described the descendants of Ambarish and then detailed the descendants of Iksvaku (another of Vaivasvata Manu’s sons) up to Mandhata, whose unique birth and powerful rulership was described. Mandhata’s fifty daughters were all married to Saubhari Muni, and Sukadeva Goswami thus narrated the sage’s history. Once, while meditating in the waters of the Yamuna, Saubhari witnessed two fishes copulating. He became so sexually agitated that he desired to marry one of Mandhata’s daughters. He rejuvenated his body, after which all fifty daughters selected him as their husband. By dint of yogic power, the former ascetic provided all household opulence for his wives, had 100 children with each one and thus expanded his family network. He later reflected on how ephemeral sense gratification is, and how he had become entangled in a very mundane existence. Having reawakened his spiritual intelligence, he retired from family life ( vanaprastha ), practised austerities and subsequently attained perfection.

Previous R – Ramacandra (6-13) Next Other Descendants Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.1

↗
శ్రీశుక ఉవాచ మాన్ధాతు: పుత్రప్రవరో యోఽమ్బరీష: ప్రకీర్తిత: । పితామహేన ప్రవృతో యౌవనాశ్వస్తు తత్సుత: । హారీతస్తస్య పుత్రోఽభూన్మాన్ధాతృప్రవరా ఇమే ॥ ౧ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
māndhātuḥ putra-pravaro
[maandhaatuh putra-pravaro]
yo ’mbarīṣaḥ prakīrtitaḥ
[yo ’mbareeshah prakeertitah]
pitāmahena pravṛto
[pitaamahena pravrito]
yauvanāśvas tu tat-sutaḥ
[yauvanaashvas tu tat-sutah]
hārītas tasya putro ’bhūn
[haareetas tasya putro ’bhoon]
māndhātṛ-pravarā ime
[maandhaatri-pravaraa ime]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said māndhātuḥ — of Māndhātā putra-pravaraḥ — the prominent son yaḥ — the one who ambarīṣaḥ — by the name Ambarīṣa prakīrtitaḥ — celebrated pitāmahena — by his grandfather Yuvanāśva pravṛtaḥ — accepted yauvanāśvaḥ — named Yauvanāśva tu — and tat-sutaḥ — the son of Ambarīṣa hārītaḥ — by the name Hārīta tasya — of Yauvanāśva putraḥ — the son abhūt — became māndhātṛ — in the dynasty of Māndhātā pravarāḥ — most prominent ime — all of them.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
māndhātuḥ putra-pravaro
māndhātuḥ
of Māndhātā
putra-pravaraḥ
the prominent son
yo ’mbarīṣaḥ prakīrtitaḥ
pitāmahena pravṛto
yauvanāśvas tu tat-sutaḥ
yaḥ
the one who
ambarīṣaḥ
by the name Ambarīṣa
hārītas tasya putro ’bhūn
māndhātṛ-pravarā ime
prakīrtitaḥ
celebrated
pitāmahena
by his grandfather Yuvanāśva
pravṛtaḥ
accepted
yauvanāśvaḥ
named Yauvanāśva
tu
and
tat-sutaḥ
the son of Ambarīṣa
hārītaḥ
by the name Hārīta
tasya
of Yauvanāśva
putraḥ
the son
abhūt
became
māndhātṛ
in the dynasty of Māndhātā
pravarāḥ
most prominent
ime
all of them.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: The most prominent among the sons of Māndhātā was he who is celebrated as Ambarīṣa. Ambarīṣa was accepted as son by his grandfather Yuvanāśva. Ambarīṣa’s son was Yauvanāśva, and Yauvanāśva’s son was Hārīta. In Māndhātā’s dynasty, Ambarīṣa, Hārīta and Yauvanāśva were very prominent.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: The most prominent among the sons of Māndhātā was he who is celebrated as Ambarīṣa. Ambarīṣa was accepted as a son by his grandfather Yuvanāśva. Ambarīṣa's son was Yauvanāśva, and Yauvanāśva's son was Hārīta. In Māndhātā's dynasty, Ambarīṣa, Hārīta and Yauvanāśva were very prominent. In the Seventh Chapter Hariścandra, a descendent of Māndhātā, cheats Varuṇa out of affection for his son, and then satisfies him with a human sacrifice. Yuvanāśva, the grandfather, accepted Ambarīṣa as his son. Ambariṣa’s son was Yauvanāśva. Ambarīṣa, Yauvanāśva and Harītā were the chief descendents of Māndhātā.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.2

↗
నర్మదా భ్రాతృభిర్దత్తా పురుకుత్సాయ యోరగై: । తయా రసాతలం నీతో భుజగేన్ద్రప్రయుక్తయా ॥ ౨ ॥
narmadā bhrātṛbhir dattā
[narmadaa bhraatribhir dattaa]
purukutsāya yoragaiḥ
[purukutsaaya yoragaih]
tayā rasātalaṁ nīto
[tayaa rasaatalam neeto]
bhujagendra-prayuktayā
[bhujagendra-prayuktayaa]
narmadā — by the name Narmadā bhrātṛbhiḥ — by her brothers dattā — was given in charity purukutsāya — unto Purukutsa yā — she who uragaiḥ — by the serpents (sarpa-gaṇa) tayā — by her rasātalam — to the lower region of the universe nītaḥ — was brought bhujaga-indra-prayuktayā — engaged by Vāsuki, the King of the serpents.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
narmadā bhrātṛbhir dattā
narmadā
by the name Narmadā
bhrātṛbhiḥ
by her brothers
dattā
was given in charity
purukutsāya yoragaiḥ
purukutsāya
unto Purukutsa
tayā rasātalaṁ nīto
yā
she who
uragaiḥ
by the serpents (sarpa-gaṇa)
tayā
by her
bhujagendra-prayuktayā
rasātalam
to the lower region of the universe
nītaḥ
was brought
bhujaga-indra-prayuktayā
engaged by Vāsuki, the King of the serpents.
The serpent brothers of Narmadā gave Narmadā to Purukutsa. Being sent by Vāsuki, she took Purukutsa to the lower region of the universe.

Before describing the descendants of Purukutsa, the son of Māndhātā, Śukadeva Gosvāmī first describes how Purukutsa was married to Narmadā, who was induced to take him to the lower region of the universe.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The serpent brothers of Narmadā gave their sister Narmadā to Purukutsa. [Note: Māndhātā had three sons, Purukutsa, Ambarīṣa and Mucukunda.] Being urged by Vāsuki, she took Purukutsa to the lower region of the universe. In speaking of the dynasty of Purukutsa, first his marriage is described. The snakes gave her to Purukutsa in marriage. She brought him to Rasātala.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.3

↗
గన్ధర్వానవధీత్ తత్ర వధ్యాన్ వై విష్ణుశక్తిధృక్ । నాగాల్లబ్ధవర: సర్పాదభయం స్మరతామిదమ్ ॥ ౩ ॥
gandharvān avadhīt tatra
[gandharvaan avadheet tatra]
vadhyān vai viṣṇu-śakti-dhṛk
[vadhyaan vai vishnu-shakti-dhrik]
nāgāl labdha-varaḥ sarpād
[naagaal labdha-varah sarpaad]
abhayaṁ smaratām idam
[abhayam smarataam idam]
gandharvān — the inhabitants of Gandharvaloka avadhīt — he killed tatra — there (in the lower region of the universe) vadhyān — who deserved to be killed vai — indeed viṣṇu-śakti-dhṛk — being empowered by Lord Viṣṇu nāgāt — from the Nāgas labdha-varaḥ — having received a benediction sarpāt — from the snakes abhayam — assurances smaratām — of those who remember idam — this incident.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gandharvān avadhīt tatra
gandharvān
the inhabitants of Gandharvaloka
avadhīt
he killed
tatra
there (in the lower region of the universe)
vadhyān vai viṣṇu-śakti-dhṛk
vadhyān
who deserved to be killed
vai
indeed
viṣṇu-śakti-dhṛk
being empowered by Lord Viṣṇu
nāgāl labdha-varaḥ sarpād
nāgāt
from the Nāgas
labdha-varaḥ
having received a benediction
sarpāt
from the snakes
abhayaṁ smaratām idam
abhayam
assurances
smaratām
of those who remember
idam
this incident.
There in Rasātala, the lower region of the universe, Purukutsa, being empowered by Lord Viṣṇu, was able to kill all the Gandharvas who deserved to be killed. Purukutsa received the benediction from the serpents that anyone who remembers this history of his being brought by Narmadā to the lower region of the universe will be assured of safety from the attack of snakes.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
There in Rasātala, Purukutsa, being empowered by Viṣṇu, was able to kill all the Gandharvas who deserved to be killed. Purukutsa received the benediction from the serpents that anyone who remembers how he was brought to Rasātala will be free of fear of snakes. He killed those who deserved to be killed. Those who remember how he was brought to Rasātala will have no fear of snakes.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.4

↗
త్రసద్దస్యు: పౌరుకుత్సో యోఽనరణ్యస్య దేహకృత్ । హర్యశ్వస్తత్సుతస్తస్మాత్ప్రారుణోఽథ త్రిబన్ధన: ॥ ౪ ॥
trasaddasyuḥ paurukutso
[trasaddasyuh paurukutso]
yo ’naraṇyasya deha-kṛt
[yo ’naranyasya deha-krit]
haryaśvas tat-sutas tasmāt
[haryashvas tat-sutas tasmaat]
prāruṇo ’tha tribandhanaḥ
[praaruno ’tha tribandhanah]
trasaddasyuḥ — by the name Trasaddasyu paurukutsaḥ — the son of Purukutsa yaḥ — who anaraṇyasya — of Anaraṇya deha-kṛt — the father haryaśvaḥ — by the name Haryaśva tat-sutaḥ — the son of Anaraṇya tasmāt — from him (Haryaśva) prāruṇaḥ — by the name Prāruṇa atha — then, from Prāruṇa tribandhanaḥ — his son, Tribandhana.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
trasaddasyuḥ paurukutso
trasaddasyuḥ
by the name Trasaddasyu
paurukutsaḥ
the son of Purukutsa
yo ’naraṇyasya deha-kṛt
yaḥ
who
haryaśvas tat-sutas tasmāt
prāruṇo ’tha tribandhanaḥ
anaraṇyasya
of Anaraṇya
deha-kṛt
the father
haryaśvaḥ
by the name Haryaśva
tat-sutaḥ
the son of Anaraṇya
tasmāt
from him (Haryaśva)
prāruṇaḥ
by the name Prāruṇa
atha
then, from Prāruṇa
tribandhanaḥ
his son, Tribandhana.
The son of Purukutsa was Trasaddasyu, who was the father of Anaraṇya. Anaraṇya’s son was Haryaśva, the father of Prāruṇa. Prāruṇa was the father of Tribandhana.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Purukutsa was Trasaddasyu, who was the father of Anaraṇya. Anaraṇya's son was Haryaśva, the father of Prāruṇa. Prāruṇa was the father of Tribandhana. Trasaddasyu was the father (deha-krṭ). His son was Anaraṇya.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.5-6

↗
తస్య సత్యవ్రత: పుత్రస్త్రిశఙ్కురితి విశ్రుత: । ప్రాప్తశ్చాణ్డాలతాం శాపాద్ గురో: కౌశికతేజసా ॥ ౫ ॥ సశరీరో గత: స్వర్గమద్యాపి దివి ద‍ృశ్యతే । పాతితోఽవాక్ శిరా దేవైస్తేనైవ స్తమ్భితో బలాత్ ॥ ౬ ॥
tasya satyavrataḥ putras
[tasya satyavratah putras]
triśaṅkur iti viśrutaḥ
[trishankur iti vishrutah]
prāptaś cāṇḍālatāṁ śāpād
[praaptash chaandaalataam shaapaad]
guroḥ kauśika-tejasā
[guroh kaushika-tejasaa]
saśarīro gataḥ svargam
[sashareero gatah svargam]
adyāpi divi dṛśyate
[adyaapi divi drishyate]
pātito ’vāk-śirā devais
[paatito ’vaak-shiraa devais]
tenaiva stambhito balāt
[tenaiva stambhito balaat]
tasya — of Tribandhana satyavrataḥ — by the name Satyavrata putraḥ — the son triśaṅkuḥ — by the name Triśaṅku iti — thus viśrutaḥ — celebrated prāptaḥ — had obtained cāṇḍālatām — the quality of a caṇḍāla, lower than a śūdra śāpāt — from the curse guroḥ — of his father kauśika-tejasā — by the prowess of Kauśika (Viśvāmitra) saśarīraḥ — while in this body gataḥ — went svargam — to the heavenly planet adya api — until today divi — in the sky dṛśyate — can be seen pātitaḥ — having fallen down avāk-śirāḥ — with his head hanging downward devaiḥ — by the prowess of the demigods tena — by Viśvāmitra eva — indeed stambhitaḥ — fixed balāt — by superior power.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya satyavrataḥ putras
tasya
of Tribandhana
satyavrataḥ
by the name Satyavrata
putraḥ
the son
triśaṅkur iti viśrutaḥ
triśaṅkuḥ
by the name Triśaṅku
iti
thus
viśrutaḥ
celebrated
prāptaś cāṇḍālatāṁ śāpād
prāptaḥ
had obtained
cāṇḍālatām
the quality of a caṇḍāla, lower than a śūdra
śāpāt
from the curse
guroḥ kauśika-tejasā
guroḥ
of his father
kauśika-tejasā
by the prowess of Kauśika (Viśvāmitra)
saśarīraḥ
while in this body
saśarīro gataḥ svargam
gataḥ
went
svargam
to the heavenly planet
adyāpi divi dṛśyate
adya api
until today
divi
in the sky
dṛśyate
can be seen
pātito ’vāk-śirā devais
pātitaḥ
having fallen down
avāk-śirāḥ
with his head hanging downward
devaiḥ
by the prowess of the demigods
tenaiva stambhito balāt
tena
by Viśvāmitra
eva
indeed
stambhitaḥ
fixed
balāt
by superior power.
The son of Tribandhana was Satyavrata, who is celebrated by the name Triśaṅku. Because he kidnapped the daughter of a brāhmaṇa when she was being married, his father cursed him to become a caṇḍāla, lower than a śūdra. Thereafter, by the influence of Viśvāmitra, he went to the higher planetary system, the heavenly planets, in his material body, but because of the prowess of the demigods he fell back downward. Nonetheless, by the power of Viśvāmitra, he did not fall all the way down; even today he can still be seen hanging in the sky, head downward.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Tribandhana was Satyavrata, who is celebrated by the name Triśaṅku. His father cursed him to become a caṇḍāla. Thereafter, by the influence of Viśvāmitra, he went to Svarga in the same body, but because of the prowess of the devatās he fell downward. Nonetheless, by the power of Viśvāmitra, he did not fall all the way down; even today he can still be seen hanging in the sky, head downward. He was called Triśaṅku because he had faults which caused suffering like three nails (śaṅku). This is told in Hari-vaṁśa. He displeased his father, he killed the milking cow of his guru, and he enjoyed unsanctified items. These were his three faults. He was cursed by his father out of anger because he stole the bride of a brāhmaṇa who was being married. By Viśvāmitra power (kauśika-tejasā) he did not fall but remained in the sky.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.7

↗
త్రైశఙ్కవో హరిశ్చన్ద్రో విశ్వామిత్రవసిష్ఠయో: । యన్నిమిత్తమభూద్ యుద్ధం పక్షిణోర్బహువార్షికమ్ ॥ ౭ ॥
traiśaṅkavo hariścandro
[traishankavo harishchandro]
viśvāmitra-vasiṣṭhayoḥ
[vishvaamitra-vasishthayoh]
yan-nimittam abhūd yuddhaṁ
[yan-nimittam abhood yuddham]
pakṣiṇor bahu-vārṣikam
[pakshinor bahu-vaarshikam]
traiśaṅkavaḥ — the son of Triśaṅku hariścandraḥ — by the name Hariścandra viśvāmitra-vasiṣṭhayoḥ — between Viśvāmitra and Vasiṣṭha yat-nimittam — because of Hariścandra abhūt — there was yuddham — a great fight pakṣiṇoḥ — both of whom had been converted into birds bahu-vārṣikam — for many years.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
traiśaṅkavo hariścandro
traiśaṅkavaḥ
the son of Triśaṅku
hariścandraḥ
by the name Hariścandra
viśvāmitra-vasiṣṭhayoḥ
viśvāmitra-vasiṣṭhayoḥ
between Viśvāmitra and Vasiṣṭha
yan-nimittam abhūd yuddhaṁ
yat-nimittam
because of Hariścandra
abhūt
there was
yuddham
a great fight
pakṣiṇor bahu-vārṣikam
pakṣiṇoḥ
both of whom had been converted into birds
bahu-vārṣikam
for many years.
The son of Triśaṅku was Hariścandra. Because of Hariścandra there was a quarrel between Viśvāmitra and Vasiṣṭha, who for many years fought one another, having been transformed into birds.

Viśvāmitra and Vasiṣṭha were always inimical. Formerly, Viśvāmitra was a kṣatriya, and by undergoing severe austerities he wanted to become a brāhmaṇa, but Vasiṣṭha would not agree to accept him. In this way there was always disagreement between the two. Later, however, Vasiṣṭha accepted him because of Viśvāmitra’s quality of forgiveness. Once Hariścandra performed a yajṣa for which Viśvāmitra was the priest, but Viśvāmitra, being angry at Hariścandra, took away all his possessions, claiming them as a contribution of dakṣiṇā. Vasiṣṭha, however, did not like this, and therefore a fight arose between Vasiṣṭha and Viśvāmitra. The fighting became so severe that each of them cursed the other. One of them said, “May you become a bird,” and the other said, “May you become a duck.” Thus both of them became birds and continued fighting for many years because of Hariścandra. We can see that such a great mystic yogī as Saubhari became a victim of sense gratification, and such great sages as Vasiṣṭha and Viśvāmitra became birds. This is the material world. Ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino ’rjuna. Within this material world, or within this universe, however elevated one may be in material qualities, one must suffer the conditions of birth, death, old age and disease ( janma-mṛtyu jarā-vyādhi ). Therefore Kṛṣṇa says that this material world is simply miserable ( duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam ). The Bhāgavatam says, padaṁ padaṁ yad vipadām: at every step here there is danger. Therefore, because the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement provides the opportunity for the human being to get out of this material world simply by chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra, this movement is the greatest benediction in human society.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The son of Triśaṅku was Hariścandra. Because of Hariścandra there was a quarrel between Viśvāmitra and Vasiṣṭha, who for many years fought one another, having been transformed into birds. Viśvāmitra stole everything belonging to Hariścandra on the pretext of taking donations at a Rājasūya sacrifice. Hearing this, Vaśiṣṭha became angry and cursed him to become an āḍi bird. Viśvāmitra cursed him to become a crane. Then they fought.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.8

↗
సోఽనపత్యో విషణ్ణాత్మా నారదస్యోపదేశత: । వరుణం శరణం యాత: పుత్రో మే జాయతాం ప్రభో ॥ ౮ ॥
so ’napatyo viṣaṇṇātmā
[so ’napatyo vishannaatmaa]
nāradasyopadeśataḥ
[naaradasyopadeshatah]
varuṇaṁ śaraṇaṁ yātaḥ
[varunam sharanam yaatah]
putro me jāyatāṁ prabho
[putro me jaayataam prabho]
saḥ — that Hariścandra anapatyaḥ — being without a son viṣaṇṇa-ātmā — therefore very morose nāradasya — of Nārada upadeśataḥ — by the advice varuṇam — unto Varuṇa śaraṇam yātaḥ — took shelter putraḥ — a son me — of me jāyatām — let there be born prabho — O my lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’napatyo viṣaṇṇātmā
saḥ
that Hariścandra
anapatyaḥ
being without a son
viṣaṇṇa-ātmā
therefore very morose
nāradasya
of Nārada
upadeśataḥ
by the advice
nāradasyopadeśataḥ
varuṇaṁ śaraṇaṁ yātaḥ
varuṇam
unto Varuṇa
śaraṇam yātaḥ
took shelter
putro me jāyatāṁ prabho
putraḥ
a son
me
of me
jāyatām
let there be born
prabho
O my lord.
Hariścandra had no son and was therefore extremely morose. Once, therefore, following the advice of Nārada, he took shelter of Varuṇa and said to him, “My lord, I have no son. Would you kindly give me one?”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hariścandra had no son and was therefore extremely morose. Once, therefore, following the advice of Nārada, he took shelter of Varuṇa and said to him "My lord! Please give me a son." Saḥ refers to Hariścandra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.9

↗
యది వీరో మహారాజ తేనైవ త్వాం యజే ఇతి । తథేతి వరుణేనాస్య పుత్రో జాతస్తు రోహిత: ॥ ౯ ॥
yadi vīro mahārāja
[yadi veero mahaaraaja]
tenaiva tvāṁ yaje iti
[tenaiva tvaam yaje iti]
tatheti varuṇenāsya
[tatheti varunenaasya]
putro jātas tu rohitaḥ
[putro jaatas tu rohitah]
yadi — if vīraḥ — there is a son mahārāja — O Mahārāja Parīkṣit tena eva — even by that son tvām — unto you yaje — I shall offer sacrifice iti — thus tathā — as you desire iti — thus accepted varuṇena — by Varuṇa asya — of Mahārāja Hariścandra putraḥ — a son jātaḥ — was born tu — indeed rohitaḥ — by the name Rohita.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadi vīro mahārāja
yadi
if
vīraḥ
there is a son
mahārāja
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit
tenaiva tvāṁ yaje iti
tena eva
even by that son
tvām
unto you
yaje
I shall offer sacrifice
iti
thus
tatheti varuṇenāsya
tathā
as you desire
putro jātas tu rohitaḥ
iti
thus accepted
varuṇena
by Varuṇa
asya
of Mahārāja Hariścandra
putraḥ
a son
jātaḥ
was born
tu
indeed
rohitaḥ
by the name Rohita.
O King Parīkṣit, Hariścandra begged Varuṇa, “My lord, if a son is born to me, with that son I shall perform a sacrifice for your satisfaction.” When Hariścandra said this, Varuṇa replied, “Let it be so.” Because of Varuṇa’s benediction, Hariścandra begot a son named Rohita.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit! Hariścandra begged Varuṇa, "My lord, if a son is born to me, with that son as an offering I shall perform a sacrifice to you." Varuṇa agreed. Because of Varuṇa's benediction, Hariścandra begot a son named Rohita. Tatheti varuṇena means “because of Varuṇa who had agreed to give a boon.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.10

↗
జాత: సుతో హ్యనేనాఙ్గ మాం యజస్వేతి సోఽబ్రవీత్ । యదా పశుర్నిర్దశ: స్యాదథ మేధ్యో భవేదితి ॥ ౧౦ ॥
jātaḥ suto hy anenāṅga
[jaatah suto hy anenaanga]
māṁ yajasveti so ’bravīt
[maam yajasveti so ’braveet]
yadā paśur nirdaśaḥ syād
[yadaa pashur nirdashah syaad]
atha medhyo bhaved iti
[atha medhyo bhaved iti]
jātaḥ — has been born sutaḥ — a son hi — indeed anena — by this son aṅga — O Hariścandra mām — unto me yajasva — offer sacrifice iti — thus saḥ — he, Varuṇa abravīt — said yadā — when paśuḥ — an animal nirdaśaḥ — has passed ten days syāt — should become atha — then medhyaḥ — suitable for offering in sacrifice bhavet — becomes iti — thus (Hariścandra said).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jātaḥ suto hy anenāṅga
jātaḥ
has been born
sutaḥ
a son
hi
indeed
anena
by this son
aṅga
O Hariścandra
māṁ yajasveti so ’bravīt
mām
unto me
yajasva
offer sacrifice
iti
thus
yadā paśur nirdaśaḥ syād
saḥ
he, Varuṇa
abravīt
said
yadā
when
paśuḥ
an animal
nirdaśaḥ
has passed ten days
syāt
should become
atha medhyo bhaved iti
atha
then
medhyaḥ
suitable for offering in sacrifice
bhavet
becomes
iti
thus (Hariścandra said).
Thereafter, when the child was born, Varuṇa approached Hariścandra and said, “Now you have a son. With this son you can offer me a sacrifice.” In answer to this, Hariścandra said, “After ten days have passed since an animal’s birth, the animal becomes fit to be sacrificed.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, Varuṇa said, “A son has been born. With this son you can offer me a sacrifice." In answer to this, Hariścandra said, "After ten days have passed since an animal's birth, the animal becomes fit to be sacrificed." Varuṇa spoke. Out of affection for his son, Hariścandra then spoke in order to cheat Varuṇa. “After ten days an animal becomes pure.”
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.11

↗
నిర్దశే చ స ఆగత్య యజస్వేత్యాహ సోఽబ్రవీత్ । దన్తా: పశోర్యజ్జాయేరన్నథ మేధ్యో భవేదితి ॥ ౧౧ ॥
nirdaśe ca sa āgatya
[nirdashe cha sa aagatya]
yajasvety āha so ’bravīt
[yajasvety aaha so ’braveet]
dantāḥ paśor yaj jāyerann
[dantaah pashor yaj jaayerann]
atha medhyo bhaved iti
[atha medhyo bhaved iti]
nirdaśe — after ten days ca — also saḥ — he, Varuṇa āgatya — coming there yajasva — now sacrifice iti — thus āha — said saḥ — he, Hariścandra abravīt — replied dantāḥ — the teeth paśoḥ — of the animal yat — when jāyeran — have appeared atha — then medhyaḥ — fit for being sacrificed bhavet — will become iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nirdaśe ca sa āgatya
nirdaśe
after ten days
ca
also
saḥ
he, Varuṇa
āgatya
coming there
yajasvety āha so ’bravīt
yajasva
now sacrifice
iti
thus
dantāḥ paśor yaj jāyerann
āha
said
saḥ
he, Hariścandra
abravīt
replied
dantāḥ
the teeth
paśoḥ
of the animal
yat
when
jāyeran
have appeared
atha medhyo bhaved iti
atha
then
medhyaḥ
fit for being sacrificed
bhavet
will become
iti
thus.
After ten days, Varuṇa came again and said to Hariścandra, “Now you can perform the sacrifice.” Hariścandra replied, “When an animal grows teeth, then it becomes pure enough to be sacrificed.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After ten days, Varuṇa came again and said to Hariścandra, "Now you can perform the sacrifice." Hariścandra replied, "When an animal grows teeth, then it becomes pure enough to be sacrificed."
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.12

↗
దన్తా జాతా యజస్వేతి స ప్రత్యాహాథ సోఽబ్రవీత్ । యదా పతన్త్యస్య దన్తా అథ మేధ్యో భవేదితి ॥ ౧౨ ॥
dantā jātā yajasveti
[dantaa jaataa yajasveti]
sa pratyāhātha so ’bravīt
[sa pratyaahaatha so ’braveet]
yadā patanty asya dantā
[yadaa patanty asya dantaa]
atha medhyo bhaved iti
[atha medhyo bhaved iti]
dantāḥ — the teeth jātāḥ — have grown yajasva — now sacrifice iti — thus saḥ — he, Varuṇa pratyāha — said atha — thereupon saḥ — he, Hariścandra abravīt — replied yadā — when patanti — fall out asya — his dantāḥ — teeth atha — then medhyaḥ — fit for sacrifice bhavet — will become iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dantā jātā yajasveti
dantāḥ
the teeth
jātāḥ
have grown
yajasva
now sacrifice
sa pratyāhātha so ’bravīt
iti
thus
saḥ
he, Varuṇa
pratyāha
said
yadā patanty asya dantā
atha
thereupon
saḥ
he, Hariścandra
abravīt
replied
yadā
when
patanti
fall out
asya
his
dantāḥ
teeth
atha medhyo bhaved iti
atha
then
medhyaḥ
fit for sacrifice
bhavet
will become
iti
thus.
When the teeth grew, Varuṇa came and said to Hariścandra, “Now the animal has grown teeth, and you can perform the sacrifice.” Hariścandra replied, “When all its teeth have fallen out, then it will be fit for sacrifice.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the teeth grew, Varuṇa came and said to Hariścandra, "Now the animal has grown teeth. Perform the sacrifice." Hariścandra replied, "When all its teeth have fallen out, then it will be fit for sacrifice."
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.13

↗
పశోర్నిపతితా దన్తా యజస్వేత్యాహ సోఽబ్రవీత్ । యదా పశో: పునర్దన్తా జాయన్తేఽథ పశు: శుచి: ॥ ౧౩ ॥
paśor nipatitā dantā
[pashor nipatitaa dantaa]
yajasvety āha so ’bravīt
[yajasvety aaha so ’braveet]
yadā paśoḥ punar dantā
[yadaa pashoh punar dantaa]
jāyante ’tha paśuḥ śuciḥ
[jaayante ’tha pashuh shuchih]
paśoḥ — of the animal nipatitāḥ — have fallen out dantāḥ — the teeth yajasva — now sacrifice him iti — thus āha — said (Varuṇa) saḥ — he, Hariścandra abravīt — replied yadā — when paśoḥ — of the animal punaḥ — again dantāḥ — the teeth jāyante — grow atha — then paśuḥ — the animal śuciḥ — is purified for being sacrificed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paśor nipatitā dantā
paśoḥ
of the animal
nipatitāḥ
have fallen out
dantāḥ
the teeth
yajasvety āha so ’bravīt
yajasva
now sacrifice him
iti
thus
āha
said (Varuṇa)
saḥ
he, Hariścandra
abravīt
replied
yadā paśoḥ punar dantā
yadā
when
paśoḥ
of the animal
punaḥ
again
dantāḥ
the teeth
jāyante ’tha paśuḥ śuciḥ
jāyante
grow
atha
then
paśuḥ
the animal
śuciḥ
is purified for being sacrificed.
When the teeth had fallen out, Varuṇa returned and said to Hariścandra, “Now the animal’s teeth have fallen out, and you can perform the sacrifice.” But Hariścandra replied, “When the animal’s teeth grow in again, then he will be pure enough to be sacrificed.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the teeth had fallen out, Varuṇa returned and said to Hariścandra, "Perform the sacrifice." But Hariścandra replied, "When the animal's teeth grow in again, then he will be pure enough to be sacrificed."
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.14

↗
పునర్జాతా యజస్వేతి స ప్రత్యాహాథ సోఽబ్రవీత్ । సాన్నాహికో యదా రాజన్ రాజన్యోఽథ పశు: శుచి: ॥ ౧౪ ॥
punar jātā yajasveti
[punar jaataa yajasveti]
sa pratyāhātha so ’bravīt
[sa pratyaahaatha so ’braveet]
sānnāhiko yadā rājan
[saannaahiko yadaa raajan]
rājanyo ’tha paśuḥ śuciḥ
[raajanyo ’tha pashuh shuchih]
punaḥ — again jātāḥ — have grown yajasva — now you offer the sacrifice iti — thus saḥ — he, Varuṇa pratyāha — replied atha — thereafter saḥ — he, Hariścandra abravīt — said sānnāhikaḥ — able to equip himself with a shield yadā — when rājan — O King Varuṇa rājanyaḥ — the kṣatriya atha — then paśuḥ — the sacrificial animal śuciḥ — becomes purified.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
punar jātā yajasveti
punaḥ
again
jātāḥ
have grown
yajasva
now you offer the sacrifice
sa pratyāhātha so ’bravīt
iti
thus
sānnāhiko yadā rājan
saḥ
he, Varuṇa
pratyāha
replied
atha
thereafter
saḥ
he, Hariścandra
abravīt
said
sānnāhikaḥ
able to equip himself with a shield
yadā
when
rājan
O King Varuṇa
rājanyo ’tha paśuḥ śuciḥ
rājanyaḥ
the kṣatriya
atha
then
paśuḥ
the sacrificial animal
śuciḥ
becomes purified.
When the teeth grew in again, Varuṇa came and said to Hariścandra, “Now you can perform the sacrifice.” But Hariścandra then said, “O King, when the sacrificial animal becomes a kṣatriya and is able to shield himself to fight with the enemy, then he will be purified.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the teeth grew in again, Varuṇa came and said to Hariścandra, "Now perform the sacrifice." But Hariścandra then said, "O King, when the kṣatriya animal is fit for wearing armor, then he will be purified." O king! O Varuṇa! When the kṣatriya animal is fit for wearing armor, it is pure.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.15

↗
ఇతి పుత్రానురాగేణ స్‍నేహయన్త్రితచేతసా । కాలం వఞ్చయతా తం తముక్తో దేవస్తమైక్షత ॥ ౧౫ ॥
iti putrānurāgeṇa
[iti putraanuraagena]
sneha-yantrita-cetasā
[sneha-yantrita-chetasaa]
kālaṁ vaṣcayatā taṁ tam
[kaalam vashchayataa tam tam]
ukto devas tam aikṣata
[ukto devas tam aikshata]
iti — in this way putra-anurāgeṇa — because of affection for the son sneha-yantrita-cetasā — his mind being controlled by such affection kālam — time vaṣcayatā — cheating tam — unto him tam — that uktaḥ — said devaḥ — the demigod Varuṇa tam — unto him, Hariścandra aikṣata — waited for the fulfillment of his promise.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti putrānurāgeṇa
iti
in this way
putra-anurāgeṇa
because of affection for the son
sneha-yantrita-cetasā
sneha-yantrita-cetasā
his mind being controlled by such affection
kālaṁ vaṣcayatā taṁ tam
kālam
time
vaṣcayatā
cheating
tam
unto him
tam
that
ukto devas tam aikṣata
uktaḥ
said
devaḥ
the demigod Varuṇa
tam
unto him, Hariścandra
aikṣata
waited for the fulfillment of his promise.
Hariścandra was certainly very much attached to his son. Because of this affection, he asked the demigod Varuṇa to wait. Thus Varuṇa waited and waited for the time to come.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of affection for his son, with mind controlled by that affection, he asked Varuṇa to delay the time. Varuṇa waited for the time to come. He, cheating time, begged Varuṇa. Varuṇa waited for the time.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.16

↗
రోహితస్తదభిజ్ఞాయ పితు: కర్మ చికీర్షితమ్ । ప్రాణప్రేప్సుర్ధనుష్పాణిరరణ్యం ప్రత్యపద్యత ॥ ౧౬ ॥
rohitas tad abhijṣāya
[rohitas tad abhijshaaya]
pituḥ karma cikīrṣitam
[pituh karma chikeershitam]
prāṇa-prepsur dhanuṣ-pāṇir
[praana-prepsur dhanush-paanir]
araṇyaṁ pratyapadyata
[aranyam pratyapadyata]
rohitaḥ — the son of Hariścandra tat — this fact abhijṣāya — having thoroughly understood pituḥ — of his father karma — action cikīrṣitam — which he was practically doing prāṇa-prepsuḥ — wishing to save his life dhanuḥ-pāṇiḥ — taking his bow and arrows araṇyam — to the forest pratyapadyata — left.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rohitas tad abhijṣāya
rohitaḥ
the son of Hariścandra
tat
this fact
abhijṣāya
having thoroughly understood
pituḥ karma cikīrṣitam
pituḥ
of his father
karma
action
cikīrṣitam
which he was practically doing
prāṇa-prepsur dhanuṣ-pāṇir
prāṇa-prepsuḥ
wishing to save his life
dhanuḥ-pāṇiḥ
taking his bow and arrows
araṇyaṁ pratyapadyata
araṇyam
to the forest
pratyapadyata
left.
Rohita could understand that his father intended to offer him as the animal for sacrifice. Therefore, just to save himself from death, he equipped himself with bow and arrows and went to the forest.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rohita could understand that his father intended to offer him as the animal for sacrifice. Therefore, just to save himself from death, taking bow and arrows, he went to the forest.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.17

↗
పితరం వరుణగ్రస్తం శ్రుత్వా జాతమహోదరమ్ । రోహితో గ్రామమేయాయ తమిన్ద్ర: ప్రత్యషేధత ॥ ౧౭ ॥
pitaraṁ varuṇa-grastaṁ
[pitaram varuna-grastam]
śrutvā jāta-mahodaram
[shrutvaa jaata-mahodaram]
rohito grāmam eyāya
[rohito graamam eyaaya]
tam indraḥ pratyaṣedhata
[tam indrah pratyashedhata]
pitaram — about his father varuṇa-grastam — having been attacked with dropsy by Varuṇa śrutvā — after hearing jāta — had grown mahā-udaram — inflated abdomen rohitaḥ — his son Rohita grāmam eyāya — wanted to come back to the capital tam — unto him (Rohita) indraḥ — King Indra pratyaṣedhata — forbade to go there.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pitaraṁ varuṇa-grastaṁ
pitaram
about his father
varuṇa-grastam
having been attacked with dropsy by Varuṇa
śrutvā jāta-mahodaram
śrutvā
after hearing
jāta
had grown
mahā-udaram
inflated abdomen
rohito grāmam eyāya
rohitaḥ
his son Rohita
grāmam eyāya
wanted to come back to the capital
tam indraḥ pratyaṣedhata
tam
unto him (Rohita)
indraḥ
King Indra
pratyaṣedhata
forbade to go there.
When Rohita heard that his father had been attacked by dropsy due to Varuṇa and that his abdomen had grown very large, he wanted to return to the capital, but King Indra forbade him to do so.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Rohita heard that his father had been attacked by Varuṇa and that his abdomen had grown very large, he wanted to return to the capital, but Indra forbade him to do so.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.18

↗
భూమే: పర్యటనం పుణ్యం తీర్థక్షేత్రనిషేవణై: । రోహితాయాదిశచ్ఛక్ర: సోఽప్యరణ్యేఽవసత్ సమామ్ ॥ ౧౮ ॥
bhūmeḥ paryaṭanaṁ puṇyaṁ
[bhoomeh paryatanam punyam]
tīrtha-kṣetra-niṣevaṇaiḥ
[teertha-kshetra-nishevanaih]
rohitāyādiśac chakraḥ
[rohitaayaadishach chakrah]
so ’py araṇye ’vasat samām
[so ’py aranye ’vasat samaam]
bhūmeḥ — of the surface of the world paryaṭanam — traveling puṇyam — holy places tīrtha-kṣetra — places of pilgrimage niṣevaṇaiḥ — by serving or going to and coming from such places rohitāya — unto Rohita ādiśat — ordered śakraḥ — King Indra saḥ — he, Rohita api — also araṇye — in the forest avasat — lived samām — for one year.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūmeḥ paryaṭanaṁ puṇyaṁ
bhūmeḥ
of the surface of the world
paryaṭanam
traveling
puṇyam
holy places
tīrtha-kṣetra-niṣevaṇaiḥ
tīrtha-kṣetra
places of pilgrimage
niṣevaṇaiḥ
by serving or going to and coming from such places
rohitāyādiśac chakraḥ
rohitāya
unto Rohita
ādiśat
ordered
so ’py araṇye ’vasat samām
śakraḥ
King Indra
saḥ
he, Rohita
api
also
araṇye
in the forest
avasat
lived
samām
for one year.
King Indra advised Rohita to travel to different pilgrimage sites and holy places, for such activities are pious indeed. Following this instruction, Rohita went to the forest for one year.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra advised Rohita that it was purifying to travel the earth with service to different pilgrimage sites. Rohita lived in the forest for one year. Samām means a year.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.19

↗
ఏవం ద్వితీయే తృతీయే చతుర్థే పఞ్చమే తథా । అభ్యేత్యాభ్యేత్య స్థవిరో విప్రో భూత్వాహ వృత్రహా ॥ ౧౯ ॥
evaṁ dvitīye tṛtīye
[evam dviteeye triteeye]
caturthe paṣcame tathā
[chaturthe pashchame tathaa]
abhyetyābhyetya sthaviro
[abhyetyaabhyetya sthaviro]
vipro bhūtvāha vṛtra-hā
[vipro bhootvaaha vritra-haa]
evam — in this way dvitīye — on the second year tṛtīye — on the third year caturthe — on the fourth year paṣcame — on the fifth year tathā — as well as abhyetya — coming before him abhyetya — again coming before him sthaviraḥ — a very old man vipraḥ — a brāhmaṇa bhūtvā — becoming so āha — said vṛtra-hā — Indra.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ dvitīye tṛtīye
evam
in this way
dvitīye
on the second year
tṛtīye
on the third year
caturthe paṣcame tathā
caturthe
on the fourth year
paṣcame
on the fifth year
tathā
as well as
abhyetyābhyetya sthaviro
abhyetya
coming before him
abhyetya
again coming before him
sthaviraḥ
a very old man
vipro bhūtvāha vṛtra-hā
vipraḥ
a brāhmaṇa
bhūtvā
becoming so
āha
said
vṛtra-hā
Indra.
In this way, at the end of the second, third, fourth and fifth years, when Rohita wanted to return to his capital, the King of heaven, Indra, approached him as an old brāhmaṇa and forbade him to return, repeating the same words as in the previous year.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this way, at the end of the second, third, fourth and fifth years, when Rohita wanted to return to his capital, Indra approached him as an old brāhmaṇa and forbade him to return. In the second year again, when Rohita approached him, Indra out of compassion forbade him to return to the city.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.20

↗
షష్ఠం సంవత్సరం తత్ర చరిత్వా రోహిత: పురీమ్ । ఉపవ్రజన్నజీగర్తాదక్రీణాన్మధ్యమం సుతమ్ । శున:శేఫం పశుం పిత్రే ప్రదాయ సమవన్దత ॥ ౨౦ ॥
ṣaṣṭhaṁ saṁvatsaraṁ tatra
[shashtham samvatsaram tatra]
caritvā rohitaḥ purīm
[charitvaa rohitah pureem]
upavrajann ajīgartād
[upavrajann ajeegartaad]
akrīṇān madhyamaṁ sutam
[akreenaan madhyamam sutam]
śunaḥśephaṁ paśuṁ pitre
[shunahshepham pashum pitre]
pradāya samavandata
[pradaaya samavandata]
ṣaṣṭham — the sixth saṁvatsaram — year tatra — in the forest caritvā — wandering rohitaḥ — the son of Hariścandra purīm — in his capital upavrajan — went there ajīgartāt — from Ajīgarta akrīṇāt — purchased madhyamam — the second sutam — son śunaḥśepham — whose name was Śunaḥśepha paśum — to use as the sacrificial animal pitre — unto his father pradāya — offering samavandata — respectfully offered his obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ṣaṣṭhaṁ saṁvatsaraṁ tatra
ṣaṣṭham
the sixth
saṁvatsaram
year
tatra
in the forest
caritvā rohitaḥ purīm
caritvā
wandering
rohitaḥ
the son of Hariścandra
purīm
in his capital
upavrajann ajīgartād
upavrajan
went there
ajīgartāt
from Ajīgarta
akrīṇān madhyamaṁ sutam
akrīṇāt
purchased
madhyamam
the second
sutam
son
śunaḥśephaṁ paśuṁ pitre
śunaḥśepham
whose name was Śunaḥśepha
paśum
to use as the sacrificial animal
pitre
unto his father
pradāya samavandata
pradāya
offering
samavandata
respectfully offered his obeisances.
Thereafter, in the sixth year, after wandering in the forest, Rohita returned to the capital of his father. He purchased from Ajīgarta his second son, named Śunaḥśepha. Then he offered Śunaḥśepha to his father, Hariścandra, to be used as the sacrificial animal and offered Hariścandra his respectful obeisances.

It appears that in those days a man could be purchased for any purpose. Hariścandra was in need of a person to sacrifice as the animal in a yajṣa and thus fulfill his promise to Varuṇa, and a man was purchased from another man for this purpose. Millions of years ago, animal sacrifice and slave trade both existed. Indeed, they have existed since time immemorial.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, in the sixth year, after wandering in the forest, Rohita returned to the capital of his father. He purchased from Ajīgarta his second son, named Śunaḥśepha. Then he offered Śunaḥśepha to his father, Hariścandra, to be used as the sacrificial animal and offered Hariścandra his respects.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.21

↗
తత: పురుషమేధేన హరిశ్చన్ద్రో మహాయశా: । ముక్తోదరోఽయజద్ దేవాన్ వరుణాదీన్ మహత్కథ: ॥ ౨౧ ॥
tataḥ puruṣa-medhena
[tatah purusha-medhena]
hariścandro mahā-yaśāḥ
[harishchandro mahaa-yashaah]
muktodaro ’yajad devān
[muktodaro ’yajad devaan]
varuṇādīn mahat-kathaḥ
[varunaadeen mahat-kathah]
tataḥ — thereafter puruṣa-medhena — by sacrificing a man in the yajṣa hariścandraḥ — King Hariścandra mahā-yaśāḥ — very famous mukta-udaraḥ — became free from dropsy ayajat — offered sacrifices devān — unto the demigods varuṇa-ādīn — headed by Varuṇa and others mahat-kathaḥ — famous in history with other exalted personalities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ puruṣa-medhena
tataḥ
thereafter
puruṣa-medhena
by sacrificing a man in the yajṣa
hariścandro mahā-yaśāḥ
hariścandraḥ
King Hariścandra
mahā-yaśāḥ
very famous
muktodaro ’yajad devān
mukta-udaraḥ
became free from dropsy
ayajat
offered sacrifices
devān
unto the demigods
varuṇādīn mahat-kathaḥ
varuṇa-ādīn
headed by Varuṇa and others
mahat-kathaḥ
famous in history with other exalted personalities.
Thereafter, the famous King Hariścandra, one of the exalted persons in history, performed grand sacrifices by sacrificing a man and pleased all the demigods. In this way his dropsy created by Varuṇa was cured.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, the famous King Hariścandra, whose story is famous among great persons, worshiped the devatās headed by Varuṇa by sacrificing a man. In this way his dropsy created by Varuṇa was cured. Mahat-kathaḥ means his story is famous among the famous persons.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.22

↗
విశ్వామిత్రోఽభవత్ తస్మిన్ హోతా చాధ్వర్యురాత్మవాన్ । జమదగ్నిరభూద్ బ్రహ్మా వసిష్ఠోఽయాస్య: సామగ: ॥ ౨౨ ॥
viśvāmitro ’bhavat tasmin
[vishvaamitro ’bhavat tasmin]
hotā cādhvaryur ātmavān
[hotaa chaadhvaryur aatmavaan]
jamadagnir abhūd brahmā
[jamadagnir abhood brahmaa]
vasiṣṭho ’yāsyaḥ sāma-gaḥ
[vasishtho ’yaasyah saama-gah]
viśvāmitraḥ — the great sage and mystic Viśvāmitra abhavat — became tasmin — in that great sacrifice hotā — the chief priest to offer oblations ca — also adhvaryuḥ — a person who recites hymns from the Yajur Veda and performs ritualistic ceremonies ātmavān — fully self-realized jamadagniḥ — Jamadagni abhūt — became brahmā — acting as the chief brāhmaṇa vasiṣṭhaḥ — the great sage ayāsyaḥ — another great sage sāma-gaḥ — engaged as the reciter of the Sāma Veda mantras..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viśvāmitro ’bhavat tasmin
viśvāmitraḥ
the great sage and mystic Viśvāmitra
hotā cādhvaryur ātmavān
jamadagnir abhūd brahmā
abhavat
became
tasmin
in that great sacrifice
vasiṣṭho ’yāsyaḥ sāma-gaḥ
hotā
the chief priest to offer oblations
ca
also
adhvaryuḥ
a person who recites hymns from the Yajur Veda and performs ritualistic ceremonies
ātmavān
fully self-realized
jamadagniḥ
Jamadagni
abhūt
became
brahmā
acting as the chief brāhmaṇa
vasiṣṭhaḥ
the great sage
ayāsyaḥ
another great sage
sāma-gaḥ
engaged as the reciter of the Sāma Veda mantras..
In that great human sacrifice, Viśvāmitra was the chief priest to offer oblations, the perfectly self-realized Jamadagni had the responsibility for chanting the mantras from the Yajur Veda, Vasiṣṭha was the chief brahminical priest, and the sage Ayāsya was the reciter of the hymns of the Sāma Veda.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In that great human sacrifice, Viśvāmitra was the chief priest to offer oblations, the perfectly self-realized Jamadagni had the responsibility for chanting the mantras from the Yajur Veda, Vasiṣṭha was the chief brahminical priest, and the sage Ayāsya was the reciter of the hymns of the Sāma Veda. The sage Ayāsya was the udgātā (sāmagaḥ).
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.23

↗
తస్మై తుష్టో దదావిన్ద్ర: శాతకౌమ్భమయం రథమ్ । శున:శేఫస్య మాహాత్మ్యముపరిష్టాత్ ప్రచక్ష్యతే ॥ ౨౩ ॥
tasmai tuṣṭo dadāv indraḥ
[tasmai tushto dadaav indrah]
śātakaumbhamayaṁ ratham
[shaatakaumbhamayam ratham]
śunaḥśephasya māhātmyam
[shunahshephasya maahaatmyam]
upariṣṭāt pracakṣyate
[uparishtaat prachakshyate]
tasmai — unto him, King Hariścandra tuṣṭaḥ — being very pleased dadau — delivered indraḥ — the King of heaven śātakaumbha-mayam — made of gold ratham — a chariot śunaḥśephasya — about Śunaḥśepha māhātmyam — glories upariṣṭāt — in the course of describing the sons of Viśvāmitra pracakṣyate — will be narrated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmai tuṣṭo dadāv indraḥ
tasmai
unto him, King Hariścandra
tuṣṭaḥ
being very pleased
dadau
delivered
indraḥ
the King of heaven
śātakaumbhamayaṁ ratham
śātakaumbha-mayam
made of gold
ratham
a chariot
śunaḥśephasya māhātmyam
śunaḥśephasya
about Śunaḥśepha
māhātmyam
glories
upariṣṭāt pracakṣyate
upariṣṭāt
in the course of describing the sons of Viśvāmitra
pracakṣyate
will be narrated.
King Indra, being very pleased with Hariścandra, offered him a gift of a golden chariot. Śunaḥśepha’s glories will be presented along with the description of the son of Viśvāmitra.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra, pleased with Hariścandra, offered him a gift of a golden chariot. Śunaḥśepha's glories will be presented later. “Later” means in relation to the story about the son of Viśvāmitra.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.24

↗
సత్యం సారం ధృతిం ద‍ృష్ట్వా సభార్యస్య చ భూపతే: । విశ్వామిత్రో భృశం ప్రీతో దదావవిహతాం గతిమ్ ॥ ౨౪ ॥
satyaṁ sāraṁ dhṛtiṁ dṛṣṭvā
[satyam saaram dhritim drishtvaa]
sabhāryasya ca bhūpateḥ
[sabhaaryasya cha bhoopateh]
viśvāmitro bhṛśaṁ prīto
[vishvaamitro bhrisham preeto]
dadāv avihatāṁ gatim
[dadaav avihataam gatim]
satyam — truthfulness sāram — firmness dhṛtim — forbearance dṛṣṭvā — by seeing sa-bhāryasya — with his wife ca — and bhūpateḥ — of Mahārāja Hariścandra viśvāmitraḥ — the great sage Viśvāmitra bhṛśam — very much prītaḥ — being pleased dadau — gave him avihatām gatim — imperishable knowledge.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satyaṁ sāraṁ dhṛtiṁ dṛṣṭvā
satyam
truthfulness
sāram
firmness
dhṛtim
forbearance
dṛṣṭvā
by seeing
sabhāryasya ca bhūpateḥ
sa-bhāryasya
with his wife
ca
and
bhūpateḥ
of Mahārāja Hariścandra
viśvāmitro bhṛśaṁ prīto
viśvāmitraḥ
the great sage Viśvāmitra
bhṛśam
very much
prītaḥ
being pleased
dadāv avihatāṁ gatim
dadau
gave him
avihatām gatim
imperishable knowledge.
The great sage Viśvāmitra saw that Mahārāja Hariścandra, along with his wife, was truthful, forbearing and concerned with the essence. Thus he gave them imperishable knowledge for fulfillment of the human mission.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The great sage Viśvāmitra, seeing the fortitude and essence of truth in Mahārāja Hariścandra and his wife, gave them imperishable knowledge. Gatim means knowledge.
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.7.25-26

↗
మన: పృథివ్యాం తామద్భ‍ిస్తేజసాపోఽనిలేన తత్ । ఖే వాయుం ధారయంస్తచ్చ భూతాదౌ తం మహాత్మని । తస్మిఞ్జ్ఞానకలాం ధ్యాత్వా తయాజ్ఞానం వినిర్దహన్ ॥ ౨౫ ॥ హిత్వా తాం స్వేన భావేన నిర్వాణసుఖసంవిదా । అనిర్దేశ్యాప్రతర్క్యేణ తస్థౌ విధ్వస్తబన్ధన: ॥ ౨౬ ॥
manaḥ pṛthivyāṁ tām adbhis
[manah prithivyaam taam adbhis]
tejasāpo ’nilena tat
[tejasaapo ’nilena tat]
khe vāyuṁ dhārayaṁs tac ca
[khe vaayum dhaarayams tach cha]
bhūtādau taṁ mahātmani
[bhootaadau tam mahaatmani]
tasmiṣ jṣāna-kalāṁ dhyātvā
[tasmish jshaana-kalaam dhyaatvaa]
tayājṣānaṁ vinirdahan
[tayaajshaanam vinirdahan]
hitvā tāṁ svena bhāvena
[hitvaa taam svena bhaavena]
nirvāṇa-sukha-saṁvidā
[nirvaana-sukha-samvidaa]
anirdeśyāpratarkyeṇa
[anirdeshyaapratarkyena]
tasthau vidhvasta-bandhanaḥ
[tasthau vidhvasta-bandhanah]
manaḥ — the mind (full of material desires for eating, sleeping, mating and defending) pṛthivyām — in the earth tām — that adbhiḥ — with water tejasā — and with fire apaḥ — the water anilena — in the fire tat — that khe — in the sky vāyum — the air dhārayan — amalgamating tat — that ca — also bhūta-ādau — in the false ego, the origin of material existence tam — that (false ego) mahā-ātmani — in the mahat-tattva, the total material energy tasmin — in the total material energy jṣāna-kalām — spiritual knowledge and its different branches dhyātvā — by meditating tayā — by this process ajṣānam — ignorance vinirdahan — specifically subdued hitvā — giving up tām — material ambition svena — by self-realization bhāvena — in devotional service nirvāṇa-sukha-saṁvidā — by transcendental bliss, putting an end to material existence anirdeśya — imperceptible apratarkyeṇa — inconceivable tasthau — remained vidhvasta — completely freed from bandhanaḥ — material bondage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
manaḥ pṛthivyāṁ tām adbhis
manaḥ
the mind (full of material desires for eating, sleeping, mating and defending)
pṛthivyām
in the earth
tām
that
adbhiḥ
with water
tejasāpo ’nilena tat
tejasā
and with fire
apaḥ
the water
khe vāyuṁ dhārayaṁs tac ca
bhūtādau taṁ mahātmani
anilena
in the fire
tasmiṣ jṣāna-kalāṁ dhyātvā
tat
that
tayājṣānaṁ vinirdahan
hitvā tāṁ svena bhāvena
nirvāṇa-sukha-saṁvidā
khe
in the sky
anirdeśyāpratarkyeṇa
tasthau vidhvasta-bandhanaḥ
vāyum
the air
dhārayan
amalgamating
tat
that
ca
also
bhūta-ādau
in the false ego, the origin of material existence
tam
that (false ego)
mahā-ātmani
in the mahat-tattva, the total material energy
tasmin
in the total material energy
jṣāna-kalām
spiritual knowledge and its different branches
dhyātvā
by meditating
tayā
by this process
ajṣānam
ignorance
vinirdahan
specifically subdued
hitvā
giving up
tām
material ambition
svena
by self-realization
bhāvena
in devotional service
nirvāṇa-sukha-saṁvidā
by transcendental bliss, putting an end to material existence
anirdeśya
imperceptible
apratarkyeṇa
inconceivable
tasthau
remained
vidhvasta
completely freed from
bandhanaḥ
material bondage.
Mahārāja Hariścandra first purified his mind, which was full of material enjoyment, by amalgamating it with the earth. Then he amalgamated the earth with water, the water with fire, the fire with the air, and the air with the sky. Thereafter, he amalgamated the sky with the total material energy, and the total material energy with spiritual knowledge. This spiritual knowledge is realization of one’s self as part of the Supreme Lord. When the self-realized spiritual soul is engaged in service to the Lord, he is eternally imperceptible and inconceivable. Thus established in spiritual knowledge, he is completely freed from material bondage.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Ninth Canto, Seventh Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Descendants of King Māndhātā.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Mahārāja Hariścandra merged his mind with the earth. Then he amalgamated the earth with water, the water with fire, the fire with the air, and the air with ether. He amalgamated the ether with the ahaṅkāra and the ahaṅkāra with mahat-tattva. He meditated on vidyā within mahat-tattva and by that vidyā destroyed avidyā. Giving up vidyā, free of bondage, he became situated in his svarūpa endowed with bliss of Brahman, inconceivable and imperceptible. The knowledge is explained. Śruti says annamayam hi saumya manaḥ: the mind is food. Because the mind is food, and earth is food, he merged his mind into earth. He merged earth into water, and water, in fire. He merged fire into air, and air into ether. He merged ether into ahaṅkāra, and merged ahaṅkāra into mahat-tattva. He meditated on vidyā (jṣāna-kalām) in mahat-tattva. He destroyed avidyā by vidyā. Giving up vidyā he remained situated in his svarūpa which was endowed with a wealth of happiness of Brahman. Thus ends the commentary on the Seventh Chapter of the Ninth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Eight Kapila Destroys Sagara’s Sons 9.8: The Sons of Sagara Meet Lord Kapiladeva 8. The Sons of Sagara Meet Lord Kapiladeva 9.8 Summary In this Eighth Chapter the descendants of Rohita are described. In the dynasty of Rohita there was a king named Sagara, whose history is described in relation to Kapiladeva and the destruction of the sons of Sagara. The son of Rohita was known as Harita, and the son of Harita was Campa, who constructed a township known as Campāpurī. The son of Campa was Sudeva, the son of Sudeva was Vijaya, the son of Vijaya was Bharuka, and the son of Bharuka was Vṛka. Bāhuka, the son of Vṛka, was greatly disturbed by his enemies, and therefore he left home with his wife and went to the forest. When he died there, his wife wanted to accept the principles of satī, dying with her husband, but when she was about to die a sage named Aurva found that she was pregnant and forbade her to do so. The co-wives of this wife of Bāhuka gave her poison with her food, but still her son was born with the poison. The son was therefore named Sagara (sa means "with," and gara means "poison"). Following the instructions of the great sage Aurva, King Sagara reformed many clans, including the Yavanas, Śakas, Haihayas and Barbaras. The king did not kill them, but reformed them. Then, again following the instructions of Aurva, King Sagara performed aśvamedha sacrifices, but the horse needed for such a sacrifice was stolen by Indra, the King of heaven. King Sagara had two wives, named Sumati and Keśinī. While searching for the horse, the sons of Sumati extensively dug up the surface of the earth and in this way dug a trench, which later became known as the Sāgara Ocean. In the course of this search, they came upon the great personality Kapiladeva and thought Him to have stolen the horse. With this offensive understanding, they attacked Him and were all burned to ashes. Keśinī, the second wife of King Sagara, had a son named Asamaṣjasa, whose son Aṁśumān later searched for the horse and delivered his uncles. Upon approaching Kapiladeva, Aṁśumān saw both the horse meant for sacrifice and a pile of ashes. Aṁśumān offered prayers to Kapiladeva, who was very pleased by his prayers and who returned the horse. After getting back the horse, however, Aṁśumān still stood before Kapiladeva, and Kapiladeva could understand that Aṁśumān was praying for the deliverance of his forefathers. Thus Kapiladeva offered the instruction that they could be delivered by water from the Ganges. Aṁśumān then offered respectful obeisances to Kapiladeva, circumambulated Him, and left that place with the horse for sacrifice. When King Sagara finished his yajṣa, he handed over the kingdom to Aṁśumān and, following the advice of Aurva, attained salvation.
📝 My note