Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.6.1-2
↗Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
My note
Source: vedabase.io
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Siva was happily married to Sati, the daughter of Daksa. When Daksa had an altercation with Siva, his harsh reaction and impulsive words triggered a chain of unsavoury events. The growing animosity culminated in the suicide of Sati and decapitation of Daksa. The episode is a striking reminder of the misfortune that occurs from impulsive, insensitive and offensive behaviour.
Previous S.K.I.P Next Genealogy of Manu’s Daughters Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Siva was happily married to Sati, the daughter of Daksa. When Daksa had an altercation with Siva, his harsh reaction and impulsive words triggered a chain of unsavoury events. The growing animosity culminated in the suicide of Sati and decapitation of Daksa. The episode is a striking reminder of the misfortune that occurs from impulsive, insensitive and offensive behaviour.
Previous S.K.I.P Next Genealogy of Manu’s Daughters Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Bankruptcy “Actually we can see that lust, anger and passion make a man crazy, even though he be as great as Daksa. The very name Daksa suggests that he was expert in all material activities, but still, because of his aversion towards such a saintly personality as Siva, he was attacked by these three enemies - anger, lust and passion. Lord Chaitanya, therefore, advised that one be very careful not to offend Vaisnavas. He compared offenses toward a Vaisnava to a mad elephant. As a mad elephant can do anything horrible, so when a person offends a Vaisnava he can perform any abominable action.” ( SB 4.2.19 ) We can lose spiritual wealth in a variety of ways. On a philosophical level, doubts can sap our determination, and in more severe cases a deviation from the path. On a practical level, inattention can stunt our growth and trigger struggles with enthusiasm and inspiration. On a relational level, we must be very careful how we interact with the holy name ( nama ), the holy places ( dhama ), our roles of responsibility ( seva ) and other devotees ( sadhus ). In each of these categories, there is the potential of causing offence, which is considered an acute threat to our spiritual life. Within the categories of offence, those committed towards another devotee ( Vaisnava aparadha ) are deemed the most serious. Daksa made the great mistake of offending Siva. When one is favoured by the saintly devotees, then they skip towards perfection, but when those saintly souls are displeased, one will slip into degradation. The Srimad-Bhagavatam reminds us that “ When a person mistreats great souls, his life span, opulence, reputation, religion, possessions and good fortune are all destroyed .” ( SB 10.4.46 )
Previous Siva Pacified and Daksa Reinstated Next Get Rich Quick Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Bankruptcy Get Rich Quick Once, I met an 82-year-old retired banker. We conversed about his life journey, the ups and downs, the twists and turns, and the pearls of wisdom that he had acquired in the process. The conversation came to the topic of money. He looked at me and exclaimed, “After all these years I have found the sure way to become rich!” Intrigued, I gave him my full attention. “Most people think that you have to earn a lot of money to become rich” he said, “but actually they’ve got it all wrong!” “So what’s the secret?” I eagerly enquired. “The secret is not to earn lots of money, but just be downright sure you don’t spend any of it!” Interesting perspective indeed! While financial investors may dispute his miserly mentality, I instead reflected on the spiritual significance of his words. From one spiritual perspective, his statement was insightful. On our life journey we gather so much spiritual wealth and credit through our daily practices, study of wisdom, service to others and acts of worship. When we live around spiritual people and associate within a devotional community it’s inevitable that we are regularly drawn into spiritually rewarding acts. We earn considerable spiritual credit often without even being aware of it. Unfortunately, we may be unknowingly squandering that wealth through our negligence and insensitivity in other areas. If we are critical and judgmental, speak harshly and fail in our consideration of others, or fall prey to carnal desires and material temptations, we end up ‘spending’ our wealth and stunting our spiritual growth. Thus, by following the basic spiritual practices and remaining conscious and alert to avoid impulsive, insensitive and offensive acts, we can become spiritually rich very quickly. So what are the offences towards other devotees that we have to be mindful of? Internal Offences – these are the negative and unfavourable thoughts we may habour against others. We may neither express nor act on them, and they don’t yield any reaction per se, but are nevertheless dangerous because they are often the beginning of bigger things. Lingering thoughts tend to manifest in words and actions. Unknowing Offences – these are offensive acts which manifest without one intending to, and which one is completely oblivious to. Someone is offended by us and we don’t even know. Such offences go unseen from our perspective, but the fact that others have been affected, means there will be a reaction in our life. Inadvertent Offences – sometimes we act in ways where we inadvertently offend someone. Seeing their disapproval, we can always seek clarity and forgiveness, and in this way resolve any issues before they manifest into something bigger. A devotee is always ready to take the humble position and apologise when necessary. Deliberate Offences – these are the most severe of all, where we intentionally speak or act in a way which causes others to become agitated or disturbed. Such transgression is the polar opposite to what Krishna’s explains when He says that “A devotee is he by whom nobody is put into difficulty” ( BG 12.15 ). Though we can always justify our acts and argue that others are being unreasonable, a devotee is extra careful when it comes to offences, knowing that any misjudgment can be critically dangerous. If we see each one of these offences, though they vary in severity, they all have their root in a lack of sensitivity. In spiritual life, as we attempt to make the shift from selfishness to selflessness, one key quality required in the transition phase is sensitivity. While we still function in the world with the mentality that we are at the centre, the potential for offence will be very high. As we learn to be more sensitive to the needs, feelings and well-being of others, we not only guard ourselves against offence, but begin to experience much more satisfying relationships.
Previous Bankruptcy Next Mediate Before You Meditate Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Bankruptcy Mediate Before You Meditate We may regularly hear about the spiritual dangers of displeasing others, but when it comes to mediating relationships and having good interactions we often, seemingly against our will, fall prey to substandard behaviour. Human relationships are riddled with the potential of quarrel and conflict. It’s a symptom of the age. But that’s not a problem per se, since every disagreement is also pregnant with positive potential. Differences of opinion can bring enlightenment, transformation, wisdom and growth – they can also be the cause of anger, frustration, resentment, and fall-out. Developing progressive responses in argumentative situations is absolutely vital. Here are some tips: Tolerance – the first moments of a conflict situation can determine the entire conversation. Be tolerant and patient. The art of conversation is not only to say the right thing at the right time but to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment. Adopting an adversarial approach erects barriers which blocks the meeting of hearts. Daksa didn’t pause to consider why Siva had not stood up to receive him, and without proper deliberation and clarification, with burning eyes of anger, he began to hurl critical words towards his son-in-law. Circumstance – beyond the perceived irrationality of actions and words, try to understand why someone is doing what they do. Then you hold the key to progress. In interpersonal relations the golden rule is this: seek first to understand, then to be understood. To do that you have to listen and explore with an open heart and open mind. Daksa considered that since Siva was his son-in-law, he should show more respect. From another perspective he failed to acknowledge that Siva is also a principal demigod, he is the topmost Vaisnava, and to honour someone means to honour the Supersoul within them, which Siva was already doing. Daksa, however, failed to contextualise Siva’s behaviour. Acceptance – we may consider that sometimes there may not be a right or wrong answer. Conflict comes from difference, but diversity is not necessarily bad. Fear of difference is fear of life itself. By accepting that we’re all individuals, with individual perspectives, we can more fully appreciate that conflict is often a case of different ‘angles of vision’ illuminating the same truth. Once Daksa began his offensive behaviour, he couldn’t find the inner strength to withdraw and became entangled in a battle of cursing and counter-cursing. Siva, on the other hand, immediately left the arena, and encouraged Sati to accept the situation too. Importance – keep disagreements in perspective and calmly evaluate their importance. We can question whether the tenacious pursuance and resolution of a conflict is absolutely necessary. Many issues can easily be dropped or ignored, but often our emotional involvement keeps us doggedly fighting till the last breath. The so-called offence was actually very minor and Siva had in numerous other ways shown respect for his father-in-law. Daksa, however, inflated this minor incident, overly elevated its importance, and thus became unnecessarily angry. Transcendence – we love to prove ourselves, but the spiritual principle is to transcend right and wrong. The real aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress. If a concession of ‘defeat’ improves our relationships, helps us develop character, and opens up opportunities for progressive solutions, then where is the loss? We shouldn’t hesitate to back down if it genuinely helps to move forward. Daksa finally accepted his mistake, and begged pardon from Siva, who willingly accepted the apology. As they connected through humility, the sacrifice commenced and everything was resolved. Conflict and unsavoury confrontation can disturb our mental state and make spiritual practice incredibly difficult. Learning to mediate our conflicts can help us to meditate in peace.
Previous Get Rich Quick Next K - Kingly Desires (8-12) Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Genealogy of Manu’s Daughters Chapter 1 From Canto Three ( Chapter 21 ) to Canto Five ( Chapter 15 ), the narrations describe the lives of Svayambhuva Manu’s children – Devahuti (3.21-4.1), Akuti (4.1), Prasuti (4.1-4.7), Uttanapada (4.8-4.31) and Priyavrata (5.1-5.15). Canto Four thus focuses on the fourth generation of progeny originating from Brahma. Maitreya Rishi continued his narrations of Svayambhuva Manu’s dynasty, now focusing on the lineages of his daughters. Svayambhuva Manu’s daughters were all married, and they bore many children. Akuti married Ruci, and they begot Yajna (an incarnation of the Lord) and Daksina (a partial incarnation of Laksmidevi). Devahuti married Kardama Muni, and their nine daughters were married to the sages, who produced many children through them. One of her daughters, Anasuya, married Atri, and thus gave birth to Dattatreya, Durvasa and Soma, who were partial manifestations of Vishnu, Siva and Brahma. Prasuti married Daksa and had sixteen daughters. One of those was Sati, who married Siva, while another daughter gave birth to the Nara-Narayana Rishis.
Previous S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Next Siva Cursed Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Sati’s Desire, Decision, Downfall and Death Chapter 3, 4 Strained relationships between the two individuals continued, but Brahma nevertheless appointed Daksa as the chief progenitor ( prajapati ). Intoxicated by pride, Daksa performed a series of elaborate sacrifices attended by many eminent personalities, but purposely neglected to invite or acknowledge Siva. On one occasion, Daksa’s daughter, Sati, developed a desire to attend the sacrifice. She approached her husband, Siva, who discouraged her from attending, foreseeing that Daksa would be neglectful and inimical due to her connection with him. He repeatedly warned Sati not to go, and predicted that if she did, the ramifications would be severe. Though confused and unsure, Sati decided to attend anyway. At the sacrificial arena, out of fear of Daksa, nobody welcomed Sati except her mother and sisters. Seeing that her father had ignored Siva in the setup of the sacrifice (no oblations were offered to him) and had not even welcomed her, she became furious. Siva’s followers were ready to kill Daksa, but Sati restrained them. Instead, she criticised Daksa for his pride and enmity, and scolded him for disrespecting Siva, who even Brahma offers obeisances to. After considering the three recourses for one who hears blasphemy, she opted to terminate her life. Thus, through the process of sat-cakra-yoga, Sati departed the world. Aggrieved to see this, Siva’s followers immediately prepared to kill Daksa, but seeing the danger, Bhrgu Muni invoked the demigods to drive them away.
Previous Siva Cursed Next Siva Creates Virabhadra Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Siva Creates Virabhadra Chapter 5 Hearing of Sati’s death, Siva became enraged, plucked one of his hairs, and created a huge black demon, Virabhadra, to kill Daksa. At the sacrificial arena everything became eerily dark, a dust storm brewed and a string of bad omens injected fear into everyone’s heart. Siva’s soldiers then entered and desecrated the entire sacrificial setup, while Virabhadra mercilessly decapitated Daksa. The demon offered Daksa’s head in the sacrificial fire, set the entire arena alight and returned to Kailash.
Previous Sati’s Desire, Decision, Downfall and Death Next Siva Pacified and Daksa Reinstated Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Siva Cursed Chapter 2 Hearing that Sati, the daughter of Daksa and Prasuti, had dramatically terminated her own life, Vidura requested an elaboration. Maitreya thus narrated the incident over several chapters. Once, a great sacrifice was organised by the leaders of universal creation, namely Marici, Daksa and Vasistha. When Daksa entered the arena, everyone stood up in respect except Lord Brahma and Lord Siva. Brahma, who was his father, did offer a welcome, but Daksa was aghast that Siva had completely neglected to acknowledge him. Misunderstanding Siva’s yogic trance as intentional disrespect, Daksa hurled arrows of insults and criticised his son-in-law’s character, lifestyle and habits. He cursed Siva to lose his share of the sacrificial oblations and angrily returned home. Outraged by Daksa’s behaviour, Nandisvara, one of Siva’s associates, issued three curses in retaliation. He declared that those who side with Daksa will lose their transcendental knowledge, that Daksa will receive the head of a goat, and that hereditary brahmanas , who practise religion simply out of ritual, will perpetually return to this material world. Infuriated by Nandisvara’s words, Bhrgu, a supporter of Daksa, counter-cursed the followers of Siva to be diverted from Vedic principles and become atheistic in their outlook. Witnessing this angry exchange of curses, Siva left the sacrificial arena in disgust, wanting to avoid any further unrest. Despite the absence of Siva and Daksa, the thousand-year sacrifice continued to conclusion.
Previous Genealogy of Manu’s Daughters Next Sati’s Desire, Decision, Downfall and Death Last updated 1 year ago
S – Siva and Sati (1-7) Siva Pacified and Daksa Reinstated Chapter 6, 7 When the defeated members of the sacrifice approached Brahma, he identified their offence as the cause of their downfall, and suggested that they immediately seek forgiveness. Brahma kindly accompanied them to Kailash, where Lord Siva warmly greeted and honoured them. Brahma glorified Siva, and requested his compassion upon the conditioned souls, who easily become overpowered by illusion (maya). He requested Siva to take his share of the sacrifice and revive the injured participants, including Daksa. This would allow the sacrifice to be completed. Siva explained that he himself did not take the offences seriously but punished them for the purpose of correction. He then gave back vitality to those who were injured, and everyone returned to the sacrificial arena. After following Siva’s direction, Daksa’s body was joined to a goat’s head and he came back to life. Seeing Siva, his heart was cleansed of all envy, he lamented the death of his daughter and begged pardon for his misbehaviour. Siva was pacified, the sacrifice resumed, and when Daksa offered clarified butter into the fire, Lord Vishnu appeared in His Narayana form. Everyone offered obeisances and prayers to the Lord, who explained the philosophy of oneness and difference between the Lord and the demigods / living entities. Maitreya finally explained how Sati had been reborn as Parvati, the daughter of Menaka (wife of the Himalayas), and that she would remarry Siva.
Previous Siva Creates Virabhadra Next Bankruptcy Last updated 1 year ago
— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata
Source: vedabase.io
As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (7.26) , vedāhaṁ samatītāni vartamānāni cārjuna. The Lord says, “I know everything that has happened in the past and is going to happen in the future.” Lord Viṣṇu is omniscient, and He therefore knew what would happen at Dakṣa’s sacrificial arena. For this reason neither Nārāyaṇa nor Lord Brahmā attended the great sacrifice performed by Dakṣa.
Source: vedabase.io
Lord Brahmā explained to the demigods that although Dakṣa wanted to enjoy the results of fruitive sacrificial activities, it is not possible to enjoy when one offends a great personality like Lord Śiva. It was good for Dakṣa to have died in the fight because if he had lived he would have committed such offenses at the lotus feet of great personalities again and again. According to Manu’s law, when a person commits murder, punishment is beneficial for him because if he is not killed he might commit more and more murders and therefore be entangled in his future lives for having killed so many persons. Therefore the king’s punishment of a murderer is appropriate. lf those who are extremely offensive are killed by the grace of the Lord, that is good for them. In other words, Lord Brahmā explained to the demigods that it was good for Dakṣa to have been killed.
Source: vedabase.io
Lord Śiva is also called Āśutoṣa. Āśu means “very soon,” and toṣa means “to become satisfied.” The demigods were advised to go to Lord Śiva and beg his pardon, and because he is very easily pleased, it was certain that their purpose would be served. Lord Brahmā knew the mind of Lord Śiva very well, and he was confident that the demigods, who were offenders at his lotus feet, could mitigate their offenses by going to him and surrendering without reservation.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
After Lord Brahmā advised the demigods to go to Lord Śiva and beg his pardon, it was suggested how he should be satisfied and how the matter should be placed before him. Brahmā also asserted that none of the conditioned souls, including himself and all the demigods, could know how to satisfy Lord Śiva. But he said, “It is known that he is very easily satisfied, so let us try to satisfy him by falling at his lotus feet.”
Actually the position of the subordinate is always to surrender to the Supreme. That is the instruction of Bhagavad-gītā. The Lord asks everyone to give up all kinds of concocted occupations and simply surrender unto Him. That will protect the conditioned souls from all sinful reactions. Similarly, in this case Brahmā also suggested that they go and surrender unto the lotus feet of Lord Śiva, for since he is very kind and easily satisfied, this action would prove effective.
Source: vedabase.io
The abode of Lord Śiva, which is known as Kailāsa, is described in the fourteen verses which follow.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
According to the commentary called Śrī-Bhāgavata-candra-candrikā, the water in which Satī used to bathe was Ganges water. In other words, the Ganges flowed through the Kailāsa-parvata. There is every possibility of accepting such a statement because Ganges water also flows from the hair of Lord Śiva. Since Ganges water rests on the head of Lord Śiva and then flows to the other parts of the universe, it is quite possible that the water in which Satī bathed, which was certainly very nicely scented, was Ganges water.
Source: vedabase.io
Sometimes Alakā is known as Alakā-purī, which is also the name of the abode of Kuvera. Kuvera’s abode, however, cannot be seen from Kailāsa. Therefore the region of Alakā referred to here is different from the Alakā-purī of Kuvera. According to Vīrarāghava Ācārya, alakā means “uncommonly beautiful.” In the region of Alakā that the demigods saw, there is a type of lotus flower known as Saugandhika that distributes an especially fragrant scent.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
It is understood that even the damsels of the heavenly planets are polluted by thoughts of sex enjoyment, and therefore they come in airplanes to bathe in the rivers Nandā and Alakanandā. It is significant that these rivers, Nandā and Alakanandā, are sanctified by the dust of the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In other words, just as the Ganges is sacred because its water emanates from the toes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Nārāyaṇa, so whenever water or anything is in touch with devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, it is purified and spiritualized. The rules and regulations of devotional service are based on this principle: anything in touch with the lotus feet of the Lord is immediately freed from all material contamination.
The damsels of the heavenly planets, polluted by thoughts of sex life, come down to bathe in the sanctified rivers and enjoy sprinkling water on their husbands. Two words are very significant in this connection. Rati-karśitāḥ means that the damsels become morose after sex enjoyment. Although they accept sex enjoyment as a bodily demand, afterwards they are not happy.
Another significant point is that Lord Govinda, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is described here as Tīrthapāda. Tīrtha means “sanctified place,” and pāda means “the lotus feet of the Lord.” People go to a sanctified place to free themselves from all sinful reactions. In other words, those who are devoted to the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, automatically become sanctified. The Lord’s lotus feet are called tīrtha-pāda because under their protection there are hundreds and thousands of saintly persons who sanctify the sacred places of pilgrimage. Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura, a great ācārya of the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava sampradāya, advises us not to travel to different places of pilgrimage. Undoubtedly it is troublesome to go from one place to another, but one who is intelligent can take shelter of the lotus feet of Govinda and thereby be automatically sanctified as the result of his pilgrimage. Anyone who is fixed in the service of the lotus feet of Govinda is called tīrtha-pāda; he does not need to travel on various pilgrimages, for he can enjoy all the benefits of such travel simply by engaging in the service of the lotus feet of the Lord. Such a pure devotee, who has implicit faith in the lotus feet of the Lord, can create sacred places in any part of the world where he decides to remain: tīrthī-kurvanti tīrthāni ( Bhāg. 1.13.10 ). The places are sanctified due to the presence of pure devotees; any place automatically becomes a place of pilgrimage if either the Lord or His pure devotee remains or resides there. In other words, such a pure devotee, who is engaged one hundred percent in the service of the Lord, can remain anywhere in the universe, and that part of the universe immediately becomes a sacred place where he can peacefully render service to the Lord as the Lord desires.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
The airplanes described in this verse are different from the airplanes of which we have experience. In the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and all the Vedic literatures, there are many descriptions of vimāna, which means “airplanes.” On different planets there are different kinds of airplanes. On this gross planet earth, there are airplanes run by machine, but on other planets the airplanes are run not by machine but by mantric hymns. They are also used especially for enjoyment by the denizens of the heavenly planets so that they can go from one planet to another. On other planets which are called Siddhalokas, the denizens can travel from one planet to another without airplanes. The beautiful airplanes from the heavenly planets are compared here to the sky because they fly in the sky; the passengers are compared to the clouds. The beautiful damsels, the wives of the denizens of the heavenly planets, are compared to lightning. In summation, the airplanes with their passengers which came from higher planets to Kailāsa were very pleasant to look at.
Source: vedabase.io
Yakṣeśvara is also known as Kuvera, and he is the treasurer of the demigods. In the descriptions of him in Vedic literature, it is stated that he is fabulously rich. It appears from these verses that Kailāsa is situated near the residential quarters of Kuvera. It is also stated here that the forest was full of desire trees. In Brahma-saṁhitā we learn about the desire tree which is found in the spiritual world, especially in Kṛṣṇaloka, the abode of Lord Kṛṣṇa. We learn here that such desire trees are also found in Kailāsa, the residence of Lord Śiva, by the grace of Kṛṣṇa. It thus appears that Kailāsa has a special significance; it is almost like the residence of Lord Kṛṣṇa.
Source: vedabase.io
The beauty of the forest was intensified by the presence of various lakes. It is described herein that the lakes were decorated with lotus flowers and with swans who played and sang with the birds and the humming bees. Considering all these attributes, one can imagine how beautiful this spot was and how much the demigods passing through enjoyed the atmosphere. There are many paths and beautiful spots created by man on this planet earth, but none of them can surpass those of Kailāsa, as they are described in these verses.
Source: vedabase.io
Whenever there is a nice atmosphere in the material world, immediately there is an awakening of the sexual appetite in the minds of materialistic persons. This tendency is present everywhere within this material world, not only on this earth but in higher planetary systems as well. In complete contrast with the influence of this atmosphere on the minds of the living entities within the material world is the description of the spiritual world. The women there are hundreds and thousands of times more beautiful than the women here in this material world, and the spiritual atmosphere is also many times better. Yet despite the pleasant atmosphere, the minds of the denizens do not become agitated because in the spiritual world, the Vaikuṇṭha planets, the spiritualistic minds of the inhabitants are so much absorbed in the spiritual vibration of chanting the glories of the Lord that such enjoyment could not be surpassed by any other enjoyment, even sex, which is the culmination of all pleasure in the material world. In other words, in the Vaikuṇṭha world, in spite of its better atmosphere and facilities, there is no impetus for sex life. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (2.59) , paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate: the inhabitants of Vaikuṇṭha are so spiritually enlightened that in the presence of such spirituality sex life is insignificant.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Generally, in every tree there are bird nests, and the birds congregate in the evening and create noise. But it appears that this banyan tree was devoid of nests, and therefore it was calm, quiet and peaceful. There were no disturbances from noise or heat, and therefore this place was just suitable for meditation.
Source: vedabase.io
In this verse the word mahā-yogamaye is very significant. Yoga means meditation on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and mahā-yoga means those who engage in the devotional service of Viṣṇu. Meditation means remembering, smaraṇam. There are nine different kinds of devotional service, of which smaraṇam is one process; the yogī remembers the form of Viṣṇu within his heart. Thus there were many devotees engaged in meditation on Lord Viṣṇu under the big banyan tree.
The Sanskrit word mahā is derived from the affix mahat. This affix is used when there is a great number or quantity, so mahā-yoga indicates that there were many great yogīs and devotees meditating on the form of Lord Viṣṇu. Generally such meditators are desirous of liberation from material bondage, and they are promoted to the spiritual world, to one of the Vaikuṇṭhas. Liberation means freedom from material bondage or nescience. In the material world we are suffering life after life because of our bodily identification, and liberation is freedom from that miserable condition of life.
Source: vedabase.io
The personalities sitting with Lord Śiva are significant because the four Kumāras were liberated from birth. It may be remembered that after their birth these Kumāras were requested by their father to get married and beget children in order to increase the population of the newly created universe. But they refused, and at that time Lord Brahmā was angry. In that angry mood, Rudra, or Lord Śiva, was born. Thus they were intimately related. Kuvera, the treasurer of the demigods, is fabulously rich. Thus Lord Śiva’s association with the Kumāras and Kuvera indicates that he has all transcendental and material opulences. Actually, he is the qualitative incarnation of the Supreme Lord; therefore his position is very exalted.
Source: vedabase.io
Lord Śiva is full of wisdom and tapasya, austerity. One who knows the modes of work is understood to be situated on the path of devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. One cannot serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead unless one has achieved full perfectional knowledge in the ways and means of performing devotional service.
Lord Śiva is described here as adhīśvara. Īśvara means “controller,” and adhīśvara means particularly “controller of the senses.” Generally our materially contaminated senses are apt to engage in sense gratificatory activities, but when a person is elevated by wisdom and austerity, the senses then become purified, and they become engaged in the service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Lord Śiva is the emblem of such perfection, and therefore in the scriptures it is said, vaiṣṇavānāṁ yathā śambhuḥ: Lord Śiva is a Vaiṣṇava. Lord Śiva, by his actions within this material world, teaches all conditioned souls how to engage in devotional service twenty-four hours a day. Therefore he is described here as loka-maṅgala, good fortune personified for all conditioned souls.
Source: vedabase.io
Lord Śiva’s symptoms of austerity are not exactly those of a Vaiṣṇava. Lord Śiva is certainly the number one Vaiṣṇava, but he exhibits a feature for a particular class of men who cannot follow the Vaiṣṇava principles. The Śaivites, the devotees of Lord Śiva, generally dress like Lord Śiva, and sometimes they indulge in smoking and taking intoxicants. Such practices are never accepted by the followers of Vaiṣṇava rituals.
Source: vedabase.io
The lord was sitting on a mattress of straw because such a sitting place is accepted by persons who are practicing austerities to gain understanding of the Absolute Truth. In this verse it is specifically mentioned that he was speaking to the great sage Nārada, a celebrated devotee. Nārada was asking Lord Śiva about devotional service, and Śiva, being the topmost Vaiṣṇava, was instructing him. In other words, Lord Śiva and Nārada were discussing the knowledge of the Veda, but it is to be understood that the subject matter was devotional service. Another point in this connection is that Lord Śiva is the supreme instructor and the great sage Nārada is the supreme audience. Therefore the supreme subject matter of Vedic knowledge is bhakti, or devotional service.
Source: vedabase.io
The sitting posture described herein is called vīrāsana according to the system of aṣṭāṅga-yoga performances. In the performance of yoga there are eight divisions, such as yama and niyama — controlling, following the rules and regulations, then practicing the sitting postures, etc. Besides vīrāsana there are other sitting postures, such as padmāsana and siddhāsana. Practice of these āsanas without elevating oneself to the position of realizing the Supersoul, Viṣṇu, is not the perfectional stage of yoga. Lord Śiva is called yogīśvara, the master of all yogīs, and Kṛṣṇa is called yogeśvara. Yogīśvara indicates that no one can surpass the yoga practice of Lord Śiva, and yogeśvara indicates that no one can surpass the yogic perfection of Kṛṣṇa. Another significant word is tarka-mudrā. This indicates that the fingers are opened and the second finger is raised, along with the arm, to impress the audience with some subject matter. This is actually a symbolic representation.
Source: vedabase.io
In this verse the word brahmānanda is significant. This brahmānanda, or brahma-nirvāṇa, is explained by Prahlāda Mahārāja. When one is completely absorbed in the adhokṣaja, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is beyond the sense perception of materialistic persons, one is situated in brahmānanda.
It is impossible to conceive of the existence, name, form, quality and pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead because He is transcendentally situated beyond the conception of materialistic persons. Because materialists cannot imagine or conceive of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, they may think that God is dead, but factually He is always existing in His sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha, His eternal form. Constant meditation concentrated on the form of the Lord is called samādhi — ecstasy or trance. Samādhi means particularly concentrated attention, so one who has achieved the qualification of always meditating on the Personality of Godhead is to be understood to be always in trance and enjoying brahma-nirvāṇa, or brahmānanda. Lord Śiva exhibited those symptoms, and therefore it is stated that he was absorbed in brahmānanda.
Another significant word is yoga-kakṣām. Yoga-kakṣā is the sitting posture in which the left thigh is fixed under one’s tightly knotted saffron-colored garment. Also the words manūnām ādyam are significant here because they mean a philosopher, or one who is thoughtful and can think very nicely. Such a man is called manu. Lord Śiva is described in this verse as the chief of all thinkers. Lord Śiva, of course, does not engage in useless mental speculation, but as stated in the previous verse, he is always thoughtful regarding how to deliver the demons from their fallen condition of life. It is said that during the advent of Lord Caitanya, Sadāśiva appeared as Advaita Prabhu, and Advaita Prabhu’s chief concern was to elevate the fallen conditioned souls to the platform of devotional service to Lord Kṛṣṇa. Since people were engaged in useless occupations which would continue their material existence, Lord Śiva, in the form of Lord Advaita, appealed to the Supreme Lord to appear as Lord Caitanya to deliver these illusioned souls. Actually Lord Caitanya appeared on the request of Lord Advaita. Similarly, Lord Śiva has a sampradāya, the Rudra sampradāya. He is always thinking about the deliverance of the fallen souls, as exhibited by Lord Advaita Prabhu.
Source: vedabase.io
Kaśyapa Muni was in the category of the living entities, but he had a transcendental son, Vāmanadeva, who was an incarnation of Viṣṇu. Thus although Lord Viṣṇu is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He offered His respects to Kaśyapa Muni. Similarly, when Lord Kṛṣṇa was a child He used to offer His respectful obeisances to His mother and father, Nanda and Yaśodā. Also, at the Battle of Kurukṣetra, Lord Kṛṣṇa touched the feet of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira because the King was His elder. It appears, then, that the Personality of Godhead, Lord Śiva and other devotees, in spite of their being situated in exalted positions, instructed by practical example how to offer obeisances to their superiors. Lord Śiva offered his respectful obeisances to Brahmā because Brahmā was his father, just as Kaśyapa Muni was the father of Vāmana.
Source: vedabase.io
Lord Brahmā was smiling because he knew that Lord Śiva is not only easily satisfied but easily irritated as well. He was afraid that Lord Śiva might be in an angry mood because he had lost his wife and had been insulted by Dakṣa. In order to conceal this fear, he smiled and addressed Lord Śiva as follows.
Source: vedabase.io
Although Lord Brahmā had received very respectful obeisances from Lord Śiva, he knew that Lord Śiva was in a more exalted position than himself. Lord Śiva’s position is described in Brahma-saṁhitā: there is no difference between Lord Viṣṇu and Lord Śiva in their original positions, but still Lord Śiva is different from Lord Viṣṇu. The example is given that the milk in yogurt is not different from the original milk from which it was made.
Source: vedabase.io
In this verse the word śiva-śakti is significant. Śiva means “auspicious,” and śakti means “energy.” There are many types of energies of the Supreme Lord, and all of them are auspicious. Brahmā, Viṣṇu and Maheśvara are called guṇa-avatāras, or incarnations of material qualities. In the material world we compare these different incarnations from different angles of vision, but since all of them are expansions of the supreme auspicious, all of them are auspicious, although sometimes we consider one quality of nature to be higher or lower than another. The mode of ignorance, or tamo-guṇa, is considered very much lower than the others, but in the higher sense it is also auspicious. The example may be given herein that the government has both an educational department and criminal department. An outsider may consider the criminal department inauspicious, but from the government’s point of view it is as important as the education department, and therefore the government finances both departments equally, without discrimination.
Source: vedabase.io
The Vedic system of varṇa and āśrama is never to be neglected, for these divisions are created by the Supreme Lord Himself for the upkeep of social and religious order in human society. The brāhmaṇas, as the intelligent class of men in society, must vow to steadily respect this regulative principle. The tendency in this Age of Kali to make a classless society and not observe the principles of varṇa and āśrama is a manifestation of an impossible dream. Destruction of the social and spiritual orders will not bring fulfillment of the idea of a classless society. One should strictly observe the principles of varṇa and āśrama for the satisfaction of the creator, for it is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā by Lord Kṛṣṇa that the four orders of the social system — brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas, vaiśyas and śūdras — are His creation. They should act according to the regulative principles of this institution and satisfy the Lord, just as different parts of the body all engage in the service of the whole. The whole is the Supreme Personality of Godhead in His virāṭ-rūpa, or universal form. The brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas, vaiśyas and śūdras are respectively the mouth, arms, abdomen and legs of the universal form of the Lord. As long as they are engaged in the service of the complete whole, their position is secure; otherwise they fall down from their respective positions and become degraded.
Source: vedabase.io
The Supreme Personality of Godhead is called the supreme will. It is by the supreme will that everything is happening. It is said, therefore, that not a blade of grass moves without the supreme will. Generally it is prescribed that performers of pious activities are promoted to the higher planetary systems, devotees are promoted to the Vaikuṇṭhas, or spiritual worlds, and impersonal speculators are promoted to the impersonal Brahman effulgence; but it sometimes so happens that a miscreant like Ajāmila is immediately promoted to the Vaikuṇṭhaloka simply by chanting the name of Nārāyaṇa. Although when Ajāmila uttered this vibration he intended to call his son Nārāyaṇa, Lord Nārāyaṇa took it seriously and immediately gave him promotion to Vaikuṇṭhaloka, despite his background, which was full of sinful activities. Similarly King Dakṣa was always engaged in the pious activities of performing sacrifices, yet simply because of creating a little misunderstanding with Lord Śiva, he was severely taken to task. The conclusion, therefore, is that the supreme will is the ultimate judgment; no one can argue upon this. A pure devotee therefore submits in all circumstances to the supreme will of the Lord, accepting it as all-auspicious.
tat te ’nukampāṁ susamīkṣamāṇo bhuṣjāna evātma-kṛtaṁ vipākam hṛd-vāg-vapurbhir vidadhan namas te jīveta yo mukti-pade sa dāya-bhāk
( Bhāg. 10.14.8 )
The purport of this verse is that when a devotee is in a calamitous condition he takes it as a benediction of the Supreme Lord and takes responsibility himself for his past misdeeds. In such a condition, he offers still more devotional service and is not disturbed. One who lives in such a disposition of mind, engaged in devotional service, is the most eligible candidate for promotion to the spiritual world. In other words, such a devotee’s claim for promotion to the spiritual world is assured in all circumstances.
Source: vedabase.io
When the Supreme Personality of Godhead becomes angry or kills a demon, materially this may appear unfavorable, but spiritually it is a blissful blessing upon him. Therefore pure devotees do not make any distinction between the Lord’s anger and His blessings. They see both with reference to the Lord’s behavior with others and themselves. A devotee does not find fault with the behavior of the Lord in any circumstances.
Source: vedabase.io
Persons who are materialistic and always engaged in fruitive activities for material profit cannot endure seeing the flourishing life of others. Except for a few persons in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, the entire world is full of such envious persons, who are perpetually full of anxieties because they are attached to the material body and are without self-realization. Since their hearts are always filled with anxiety, it is understood that they have already been killed by providence. Thus Lord Śiva, as a self-realized Vaiṣṇava, was advised not to kill Dakṣa. A Vaiṣṇava is described as para-duḥkha-duḥkhī because although he is never distressed in any condition of life, he is distressed to see others in a distressed condition. Vaiṣṇavas, therefore, should not try to kill by any action of the body or mind but should try to revive the Kṛṣṇa consciousness of others out of compassion for them. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement has been started to deliver the envious persons of the world from the clutches of māyā, and even though devotees are sometimes put into trouble, they push on the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement in all tolerance. Lord Caitanya advises:
tṛṇād api sunīcena taror api sahiṣṇunā amāninā mānadena kīrtanīyaḥ sadā hariḥ
“One can chant the holy name of the Lord in a humble state of mind, thinking himself lower than the straw in the street. One should be more tolerant than the tree, devoid of all sense of false prestige and ready to offer all respects to others. In such a state of mind one can chant the holy name of the Lord constantly.” ( Śikṣāṣṭaka 3)
A Vaiṣṇava should follow the examples of such Vaiṣṇavas as Haridāsa Ṭhākura, Nityānanda Prabhu and also Lord Jesus Christ. There is no need to kill anyone who has already been killed. But it should be noted herewith that a Vaiṣṇava should not tolerate the blaspheming of Viṣṇu or Vaiṣṇavas, although he should tolerate personal insults to himself.
Source: vedabase.io
It is said that the beauty of a tapasvī, or saintly person, is forgiveness. There are many instances in the spiritual history of the world in which many saintly persons, although unnecessarily harassed, did not take action, although they could have done so. Parīkṣit Mahārāja, for example, was unnecessarily cursed by a brāhmaṇa boy, and this was very much regretted by the boy’s father, but Parīkṣit Mahārāja accepted the curse and agreed to die within a week as the brāhmaṇa boy desired. Parīkṣit Mahārāja was the emperor and was full in power both spiritually and materially, but out of compassion and out of respect for the brāhmaṇa community, he did not counteract the action of the brāhmaṇa boy but agreed to die within seven days. Because it was desired by Kṛṣṇa that Parīkṣit Mahārāja agree to the punishment so that the instruction of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam would thus be revealed to the world, Parīkṣit Mahārāja was advised not to take action. A Vaiṣṇava is personally tolerant for the benefit of others. When he does not show his prowess, this does not mean that he is lacking in strength; rather, it indicates that he is tolerant for the welfare of the entire human society.
Source: vedabase.io
A Vaiṣṇava is never bewildered by the influence of the external energy because he is engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. The Lord states in Bhagavad-gītā (7.14) :
daivī hy eṣā guṇa-mayī mama māyā duratyayā mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te
“My divine energy consisting of the three modes of material nature is difficult to overcome. But those who have surrendered unto Me can easily cross beyond it.” A Vaiṣṇava should take care of those who are bewildered by this māyā instead of becoming angry with them, because without a Vaiṣṇava’s mercy they have no way to get out of the clutches of māyā. Those who have been condemned by māyā are rescued by the mercy of devotees:
vāṣchā-kalpatarubhyaś ca kṛpā-sindhubhya eva ca patitānāṁ pāvanebhyo vaiṣṇavebhyo namo namaḥ
“I offer my respectful obeisances unto all the Vaiṣṇava devotees of the Lord. They are just like desire trees who can fulfill the desires of everyone, and they are full of compassion for the fallen conditioned souls.” Those who are under the influence of the illusory energy are attracted to fruitive activities, but a Vaiṣṇava preacher attracts their hearts to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa.
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
Source: vedabase.io
A sacrifice is a ceremony performed to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, First Canto, Second Chapter, it is stated that everyone should try to understand whether the Supreme Personality of Godhead is satisfied by his activity. In other words, the aim of our activities should be to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Just as in an office it is the duty of the worker to see that the proprietor or the master is satisfied, so everyone’s duty is to see whether the Supreme Personality of Godhead is satisfied by one’s activity. Activities to satisfy the Supreme Godhead are prescribed in the Vedic literature, and execution of such activities is called yajṣa. In other words, acting on behalf of the Supreme Lord is called yajṣa. One should know very well that any activity besides yajṣa is the cause of material bondage. That is explained in Bhagavad-gītā (3.9) : yajṣārthāt karmaṇo ’nyatra loko ’yaṁ karma-bandhanaḥ. Karma-bandhanaḥ means that if we do not work for the satisfaction of the Supreme Lord, Viṣṇu, then the reaction of our work will bind us. One should not work for his own sense gratification. Everyone should work for the satisfaction of God. That is called yajṣa.
After the yajṣa was performed by Dakṣa, all the demigods expected prasāda, the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Viṣṇu. Lord Śiva is one of the demigods, so naturally he also expected his share of the prasāda from the yajṣa. But Dakṣa, out of his envy of Lord Śiva, neither invited Śiva to participate in the yajṣa nor gave him his share after the offering. But after the destruction of the yajṣa arena by the followers of Lord Śiva, Lord Brahmā pacified him and assured him that he would get his share of prasāda. Thus he was requested to rectify whatever destruction was caused by his followers.
In Bhagavad-gītā (3.11) it is said that all the demigods are satisfied when one performs yajṣa. Because the demigods expect prasāda from yajṣas, yajṣa must be performed. Those who engage in sense gratificatory, materialistic activities must perform yajṣa; otherwise they will be implicated. Thus Dakṣa, being the father of mankind, was performing yajṣa, and Lord Śiva expected his share. But since Śiva was not invited, there was trouble. By the mediation of Lord Brahmā, however, everything was settled satisfactorily.
The performance of yajṣa is a very difficult task because all the demigods must be invited to participate in the yajṣa. In this Kali-yuga it is not possible to perform such costly sacrifices, nor is it possible to invite the demigods to participate. Therefore in this age it is recommended, yajṣaiḥ saṅkīrtana-prāyair yajanti hi sumedhasaḥ ( Bhāg. 11.5.32 ). Those who are intelligent should know that in the Kali-yuga there is no possibility of performing the Vedic sacrifices. But unless one pleases the demigods, there will be no regulated seasonal activities or rainfall. Everything is controlled by the demigods. Under the circumstances, in this age, in order to keep the balance of social peace and prosperity, all intelligent men should execute the performance of saṅkīrtana-yajṣa by chanting the holy names Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. One should invite people, chant Hare Kṛṣṇa, and then distribute prasāda. This yajṣa will satisfy all the demigods, and thus there will be peace and prosperity in the world. Another difficulty in performing the Vedic rituals is that if one fails to satisfy even one demigod out of the many hundreds of thousands of demigods, just as Dakṣa failed to satisfy Lord Śiva, there will be disaster. But in this age the performance of sacrifice has been simplified: one can chant Hare Kṛṣṇa, and by pleasing Kṛṣṇa one can satisfy all the demigods automatically.
Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Fourth Canto, Sixth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Brahmā Satisfies Lord Śiva.”
Source: vedabase.io