Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.7.11
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
According to Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a liberated soul even within the womb of his mother. Śrīla Vyāsadeva knew that the child, after his birth, would not stay at home. Therefore he (Vyāsadeva) impressed upon him the synopsis of the Bhāgavatam so that the child could be made attached to the transcendental activities of the Lord. After his birth, the child was still more educated in the subject of the Bhāgavatam by recitation of the actual poems.
The idea is that generally the liberated souls are attached to the feature of impersonal Brahman with a monistic view of becoming one with the supreme whole. But by the association of pure devotees like Vyāsadeva, even the liberated soul becomes attracted to the transcendental qualities of the Lord. By the mercy of Śrī Nārada, Śrīla Vyāsadeva was able to narrate the great epic of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, and by the mercy of Vyāsadeva, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was able to grasp the import. The transcendental qualities of the Lord are so attractive that Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī became detached from being completely absorbed in impersonal Brahman and positively took up the personal activity of the Lord.
Practically he was thrown from the impersonal conception of the Absolute, thinking within himself that he had simply wasted so much time in devoting himself to the impersonal feature of the Supreme, or in other words, he realized more transcendental bliss with the personal feature than the impersonal. And from that time, not only did he himself become very dear to the viṣṇu-janas, or the devotees of the Lord, but also the viṣṇu-janas became very dear to him. The devotees of the Lord, who do not wish to kill the individuality of the living entities and who desire to become personal servitors of the Lord, do not very much like the impersonalists, and similarly the impersonalists, who desire to become one with the Supreme, are unable to evaluate the devotees of the Lord. Thus from time immemorial these two transcendental pilgrims have sometimes been competitors. In other words, each of them likes to keep separate from the other because of the ultimate personal and impersonal realizations. Therefore it appears that Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī also had no liking for the devotees. But since he himself became a saturated devotee, he desired always the transcendental association of the viṣṇu-janas, and the viṣṇu-janas also liked his association, since he became a personal Bhāgavata. Thus both the son and the father were completely cognizant of transcendental knowledge in Brahman, and afterwards both of them became absorbed in the personal features of the Supreme Lord. The question as to how Śukadeva Gosvāmī was attracted by the narration of the Bhāgavatam is thus completely answered by this śloka.
By the mercy of Nārada, Vyāsa realized the sweetness of Kṛṣṇa’s qualities. By the mercy of Vyāsa, Śukadeva realized the same sweetness even more. That is explained in this verse.
Śukadeva’s mind was disturbed by the qualities of Kṛṣṇa (harer guṇākṣipta-matiḥ). He thought, “My intelligence is unfortunate, because though the Lord’s qualities are so sweet, up until now that intelligence has been engaged uselessly in realizing brahman.” He held not only the ātmārāmas dear, but also the Vaiṣṇavas dear because of the attraction to their discussions about Kṛṣṇa (viṣṇu-jana-priyaḥ). Or the Vaiṣṇavas held him dear.
Vyāsa made Śukadeva who was in continual trance in a lonely forest hear selected verses from the Bhāgavatam which described Kṛṣṇa’s qualities through some of his followers. By the power of those verses, his trance was broken. His mind, attracted to the sweetness, broke the trance. Knowing these verses were from the Bhāgavatam because of his omniscience, and knowing that his father was the source of revealing those verses, he went to Vyāsa and learned Bhāgavatam. This story is told in the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa. After conquering father and son, Vyāsa and Śukadeva, crest jewels of brahman realization, bhakti made them like an umbrella which gives relief to the whole world. Those who do not consider bhakti in this way, being led astray, are like thieves who deserve the punishment of Yama.
- Navakishori Mataji SB 01-07-11-34
- Priya Valabha Mataji SB 01-07-11 Hindi - Part-02
- Priya Valabha Mataji SB 01-07-11 Hindi - Part-01
- DKP SB 01-07-11 - 2018-04-04 Los Angeles
- GPP SB 01-07-11 - Envious Advaita vadisvsnaive Brahma-vadis
- SKrishnaPr SB 01-07-11
- BKG SB 01-07-11 - Krishna is Transcendental - 2013-04-24 Auckland
- PrahladAnS SB 01-07-11 - Material Consciousness means Craziness - 2025-03-24 ISKCON Slovenia
- PrahladAnS SB 01-07-11 - Mayavadis Nature Need to be Attentive - 2005 Helsinki
- PrahladAnS SB 01-07-11 - Mayavadi%27s By Nature Need To Be Attentive - 2005
- RGS SB 01-07-11-21 Hindi - Kunti aur Bhishmadev ki Prarthana-02 - Mumbai
- Romapada Sw SB 01-07-11-12 - How Did SB Appear - 2008-08-10 Mclean VA
- SP Tamil Translation SB 01-07-11 - When Mad Is Not Bad - 1976-09-10 VRN
- SP SB 1-07-11 Vrindavan 1976-09-10 When Madras Is Not Bad
- What am I refusing to learn because I already feel respected?
- Whose ongoing student-mind reminds me to stay teachable?
My note
Source: vedabase.io