FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

4.26 · King Purañjana Goes to the Forest to Hunt, and His Queen Becomes Angry

24 verses · 🖨 Class prep
P Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (18892 chars)

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat appeared in the lineage of Prthu. While his sons, the Pracetas, were performing austerities in the water, he was busily engaged in mundane, material affairs. Narada Muni appeared on the scene and spiritually enlightened him through an allegory involving a character named Puranjana (the soul), who resides within the city of nine gates (the body). The powerful story instigated a profound existential awakening within the King, who realised how materially entrenched he had become.

Previous Strong Next Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Last updated 1 year ago

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31)

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat appeared in the lineage of Prthu. While his sons, the Pracetas, were performing austerities in the water, he was busily engaged in mundane, material affairs. Narada Muni appeared on the scene and spiritually enlightened him through an allegory involving a character named Puranjana (the soul), who resides within the city of nine gates (the body). The powerful story instigated a profound existential awakening within the King, who realised how materially entrenched he had become.

Previous Strong Next Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Last updated 1 year ago

Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Chapter 24 Maitreya continued by discussing the descendants in the family of Prthu. When he came to Pracinabarhisat and his ten sons, the Pracetas, he paused to narrate more. When requested by their father to procreate, the Pracetas first went to practise austerities for 10,000 years in the water. En route, they met Lord Siva who taught them a series of beautiful prayers known as the Rudra-gita. In these prayers, one first offers respects to the four expansions of Vishnu and the presiding deities of various elements, after which the Lord’s glorious form is described, along with the super-excellence of bhakti . Siva was taught this prayer by Lord Brahma, and he encouraged the Pracetas to attentively recite it with great devotion.

Previous P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Next Puranjana Story Last updated 1 year ago

Pracetas Rule

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracetas Rule Chapter 30, 31 Maitreya next reverted back to the activities of the Pracetas after they had completed their 10,000 years of austerity. [ 14 ] Satisfied by their cooperation, friendship and austerity, the Lord appeared before the Pracetas and glorified their activities. He instructed them to marry, procreate and become exemplars of bhakti in householder life. Having received this instruction, the Pracetas offered eloquent prayers to the Lord and begged to remain in the association of Vaisnavas so they could always hear about Krishna. When the Pracetas emerged from the water, they saw that the earth was covered with overgrown trees, preventing progressive agriculture and farming of the land. In anger, they generated fire from their mouths and began burning everything up so that the earth would be cleared for cultivation. After Brahma pacified them, they married Marisa, the daughter of Pamaloca, who was left in the care of the trees. Daksa, who had offended Siva, was reborn from their union. The Pracetas ruled for thousands of years, and then decided to renounce it all. They left Marisa in the care of Daksa and departed the kingdom for a life of spiritual absorption. After reaching their destination, they chanced upon Narada Muni, who instructed them to perform undiverted bhakti , which captures the Lord in the heart.

Previous Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Next Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Last updated 1 year ago

Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Chapter 29 Pracinabarhisat humbly admitted that he didn’t completely understand the deep purport of the story. Narada Muni thus elaborated on the allegory and comprehensively detailed how the conditioned soul becomes entangled in material life. Narada thus urged the King to renounce material activity and cultivate his spiritual life. He then narrated the allegory of a deer to invoke a further sense of urgency within Pracinabarhisat – the deer is grazing and enjoying the charming atmosphere, completely oblivious to the fact that a tiger is about to devour it. Narada reminded him that death was fast approaching, and his consciousness at that crucial hour would determine his next life situation. He specifically explained how the subtle body carries the soul to its next destination. When the King submitted that his illusion was over, Narada Muni happily left for Siddhaloka. Pracinabarhisat then handed over the kingdom to his sons and went to Kapilasrama to pursue spiritual perfection, which he eventually attained.

Previous Puranjana Story Next Pracetas Rule Last updated 1 year ago

Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Chapter 31 Having concluded the narration of Uttanapada (the younger son of Svayambhuva Manu) and his descendants, Sukadeva Goswami prepared himself to describe the activities of Priyavrata (the older son of Svayambhuva Manu) and his descendants. Vidura and Maitreya’s conversation thus reached its conclusion. Feeling inspired and purified by the exchange, Vidura fell at Maitreya’s feet and offered all respect and thanks. He then left for the city of Hastinapura to see his relatives and deliver transcendental knowledge to his brother. [ 15 ]

Previous Pracetas Rule Next Root of Devotion Last updated 1 year ago

Puranjana Story

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Puranjana Story Chapter 25, 26, 27, 28 While performing their austerities, the Pracetas happily recited the prayers. Meanwhile, their father, King Pracinabarhisat, was engrossed in materialistic endeavours and oblivious to the spiritual dimension of life. The itinerant preacher, Narada Muni, arrived on the scene and resolved to philosophically enlighten the King through the allegorical story of Puranjana. Long ago, a King named Puranjana was looking for a suitable place to fulfil his desires, when he chanced upon a beautiful city which had nine gates and all the necessary facilities. This, he thought, was the ideal place. Accompanied by his friend, Avijnata, he entered that city, and later became attracted by Puranjani, a woman who had ten servants. After marriage, she faithfully arranged varieties of material pleasures in the city for one hundred years, during which time the King became completely henpecked. Explanation: Wandering in the material world, the spirit soul (Puranjana) accepts a material body (city of nine gates). Though accompanied by the Supersoul (Avijnata), his attention is attracted by mundane religiosity and sense gratification (Puranjani). He thus wastes his valuable years in temporary pleasures that amount to nothing. Once, Puranjana abandoned his wife and went on a hunting excursion, indiscriminately killing many innocent animals on his journey. Hungry and thirsty, he eagerly returned to the palace, only to find the Queen lying on the ground looking depressed and emaciated. He regretted leaving her and sought forgiveness for his nefarious activities. Being pacified, the Queen regained her luster and enjoyed sexual union with him. The King begot 1,100 sons and 110 daughters, who were duly married and had their own children, and thus the city became populated. Puranjana became tormented by family demands and was plundered due to his attachments. Explanation: Sometimes, one gives up his religiosity and intelligence (abandoning Puranjani), and hedonistically runs after the opposite sex (hunting animals). Frustrated by such whimsical attempts for pleasure, one returns, repents, and regains their good sense. They again adopt a pious life, but remain absorbed in material pursuits (sexual union with Puranjani). The activities of such bewildered souls produce a network of karmic reactions which bind them to the material world (expanding family of Puranjana). Some years later, when King Chandavega and his soldiers attacked, a five- hooded snake attempted to defend the city. Puranjana, himself absorbed in sense gratification, paid little attention to the attack, while the serpent was becoming weaker and weaker. Kalakanya was Chandavega’s daughter, and she was renowned for discretely attacking people. She entered the city with her associates and embraced Puranjana, while her other associates wreaked havoc. When the situation deteriorated, the city was set ablaze and the King was forced to leave, embroiled in thoughts of his family and wife. After leaving the city, Puranjana was tormented by all the animals that he had mercilessly killed earlier in his life. Explanation: The body is eventually attacked by time (Chandavega) and our life energy (five-hooded snake) is depleted. Being preoccupied with material endeavours, old age eventually arrives (Kalakanya), almost imperceptibly, along with diseases, fear and ill-fate. The body gradually dwindles and thus becomes uninhabitable (city is set ablaze), and the soul is forced to leave, absorbed in thoughts of various attachments and desires (worry for family and dependents). Moving to the next chapter of existence, the soul is subjected to a series of karmic reactions for his misdeeds (attack of animals). Because he remembered his wife, Puranjana went on to become the daughter of King Vidarbha (Vaidarbhi), and was married to Malayadhvaja. After Vaidarbhi gave birth to children, Malayadhvaja retired from household life and dedicated himself to spiritual pursuits. Vaidarbhi followed him, and when he died, she arranged his funeral pyre and prepared to enter the fire. Just then, an old brahmana friend of Puranjana came and questioned her. He said that they were old friends, but she had forgotten him, having engaged in the illusory relationships and activities of this world. Explanation: If one is fortunate, they receive the seed of bhakti from a spiritual master (Malayadhvaja) and this gives rise to the practice of devotional service (birth of children). Those practices of bhakti expand unlimitedly (further children), and when one is mature, the spiritual master retires (Malayadhvaja renounces). The disciple always follows in the footsteps of the spiritual master, and is constantly absorbed in the fire of following his instructions. The Lord (old brahmana friend) appears before such a dedicated devotee and enlightens him with the knowledge necessary to return to the spiritual world. Narada thus concluded the allegorical story.

Previous Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Next Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Last updated 1 year ago

Root of Devotion

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion “The topmost benediction for those who are living in this material world and are subjected to the repetition of birth and death (transmigration) is association with pure devotees. One should search out such pure devotees and remain with them. That will make one completely happy, even though living within the material world. This Krishna consciousness movement is started for that purpose. A person who is overly affected materially may take advantage of this movement and become intimately associated with it. In this way the confused and frustrated inhabitants of this material world may find the highest happiness in association with devotees.” ( SB 4.30.34 ) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat was rescued from the depths of material entanglement and transported to the summit of spiritual absorption. We see this incredible transformation in many of Srimad-Bhagavatam’s personalities, and may have even witnessed similar things in the lives of those around us. If we pause for thought, we can appreciate it even in our own lives. What is the root cause which triggers a spiritual turnaround?

Previous Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Next The Beginning Last updated 1 year ago

Proofreaders of Devotion

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion Proofreaders of Devotion “I don’t read the book, I read the author. I first check whether the author is authentic. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura trained me in proofreading, so I always look for what is right or wrong. But I am not a proofreader of the press only; I am a proofreader of the world. I proofread men; I proofread religions. I dissect their faults and try to correct them.” (Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura) Devotees undoubtedly give us entrance into spiritual life, but they are also absolutely necessary if we want to progressively continue our journey. While writing the story of our life, we need proofreaders by our side. Brevity – give any piece of writing to an editor and they’ll likely compress several long paragraphs into a few short lines. They reveal the substance, and leave the rest by the wayside. In the same way, saintly persons can reveal the true substance of our spirituality. We may overembellish and exaggerate the truth, but when we appear before a transcendental proofreader, the degree of genuine sincerity, quality and devotion in our spirituality becomes strikingly apparent. Accuracy – when we pen down our thoughts, there may be mistakes in grammar, spelling and sentence formation. Proofreaders can detect, fix and ensure a smooth read. In the same way, our lives are riddled with mistakes – risky misconceptions, bad decisions, false assumptions and unhelpful attitudes. Saintly persons can detect these problems and fix them before they begin to impede our progressive journey in the story of life. Clarity – writers know what they mean but people can easily misinterpret. Proofreaders ensure that the well-intentioned meaning of the author is not misconstrued by the reader. In the same way, we may adopt a sincere and noble approach in spiritual life, but be unaware of things that may be detrimental and counterproductive to what we are trying to achieve. Proofreaders stand external to the picture of our life and flag up potentially injurious behaviours that we are oblivious to. Potency – even if a piece of writing is substantial, accurate and clear, a proofreader may well reword it to communicate the same, but with greater force and clarity. Saintly persons can, in the same way, show us a more efficient, effective and powerful way to lead our lives. We may not be doing anything wrong, but they can reveal a more effective way of reaching our goals and realising our dreams. It’s easy to get stuck into the standard ways of living and functioning, becoming averse to new approaches to life. As years go by, we get tempted to start flying solo. We should, however, always stop and consider: who is proofreading my life?

Previous Why is this Important? Next R.E.A.P Last updated 1 year ago

The Beginning

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion The Beginning In Madhurya Kadambini, Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura scientifically analyses the soul’s spiritual journey. He systematically delineates a sequence of eight stages that a sincere and serious practitioner will progress through before arriving at the ultimate goal, pure love of God ( prema ). Before describing the journey, Visvanatha Chakravarti spends considerable time discussing how one begins that spiritual journey. Our attraction for devotional activities (which is carried from previous lives) impels us towards further execution of those devotional activities in this life. That subsequent execution further increases one’s attraction. But where does the initial attraction come from? During our material sojourn, what is the turning point at which one begins cultivating their relationship with God? How is that seed of bhakti implanted within the heart? Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura explores a variety of options. Some may posit that the cause of bhakti is good fortune. Such an explanation is inconclusive, since the question remains as to how that good fortune arises. Others may propose that the cause of bhakti is good karma and pious activity. This is unacceptable since piety is still a material activity, and how could something material be the cause of something divinely spiritual? Some may posit that Krishna is the cause of bhakti . But then we face another problem since Krishna says “I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all.” ( BG 9.29 ). With that in mind, why would He bestow good fortune on some and not others? In a deeply realised and illuminating fashion, Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura reveals that the journey to pure love ultimately begins when one contacts a devotee of Krishna: “ The root cause of devotional service to Lord Krishna is association with advanced devotees. Even when one’s dormant love for Krishna awakens, association with devotees is still most essential.” ( CC Madhya 22.83 ) Since Vaisnavas have bhakti implanted within their hearts, they are impelled and equipped to give it to others, and in this way instigate the spiritual journey of another. Thus, in the deepest sense, bhakti is the cause of bhakti . Although this analysis may seem deeply philosophical, it’s incredibly practical and simple. We have all experienced that even ordinary love can’t be bought, forced, or manufactured. It is the product of an individual’s free will and desire. Only love creates love, and only divine love creates divine love. So, if we want divine love, we must encounter someone who has it. If we are fortunate to meet such a person, and receptive enough to accept that divine gift, our spiritual journey begins.

Previous Root of Devotion Next Why is this Important? Last updated 1 year ago

Why is this Important?

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion Why is this Important? Knowing that saintly association is the root cause of devotion is invaluable information. Firstly, it helps us develop a deep sense of gratitude and appreciation for Vaisnavas. Anyone who is on the spiritual journey, and has awakened bhakti in their heart is special indeed. They have the potential to transform people’s lives, and they should be honoured and valued with utmost appreciation. Secondly, it gives us a clue as to how we can instigate spiritual change in the world. As we find bigger and better ways to expose the masses of people to saintly association of Vaisnavas, we can rest assured that hearts will be touched and transformed. Thirdly, and a little closer to home, we can appreciate that if we fill our lives with the quality association of Vaisnavas, then advancement on the spiritual path is assured.

Previous The Beginning Next Proofreaders of Devotion Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.1-3

↗
नारद उवाच स एकदा महेष्वासो रथं पञ्चाश्वमाशुगम् । द्वीषं द्विचक्रमेकाक्षं त्रिवेणुं पञ्चबन्धुरम् ॥ १ ॥ एकरश्म्येकदमनमेकनीडं द्विकूबरम् । पञ्चप्रहरणं सप्तवरूथं पञ्चविक्रमम् ॥ २ ॥ हैमोपस्करमारुह्य स्वर्णवर्माक्षयेषुधि: । एकादशचमूनाथ: पञ्चप्रस्थमगाद्वनम् ॥ ३ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
sa ekadā maheṣvāso
[sa ekadaa maheshvaaso]
rathaṁ pañcāśvam āśu-gam
[ratham panchaashvam aashu-gam]
dvīṣaṁ dvi-cakram ekākṣaṁ
[dveesham dvi-chakram ekaaksham]
tri-veṇuṁ pañca-bandhuram
[tri-venum pancha-bandhuram]
eka-raśmy eka-damanam
[eka-rashmy eka-damanam]
eka-nīḍaṁ dvi-kūbaram
[eka-needam dvi-koobaram]
pañca-praharaṇaṁ sapta-
[pancha-praharanam sapta-]
varūthaṁ pañca-vikramam
[varootham pancha-vikramam]
haimopaskaram āruhya
[haimopaskaram aaruhya]
svarṇa-varmākṣayeṣudhiḥ
[svarna-varmaakshayeshudhih]
ekādaśa-camū-nāthaḥ
[ekaadasha-chamoo-naathah]
pañca-prastham agād vanam
[pancha-prastham agaad vanam]
nāradaḥ uvāca — Nārada said saḥ — King Purañjana ekadā — once upon a time mahā-iṣvāsaḥ — carrying his strong bow and arrows ratham — chariot pañca-aśvam — five horses āśu-gam — going very swiftly dvi-īṣam — two arrows dvi-cakram — two wheels eka — one akṣam — axle tri — three veṇum — flags pañca — five bandhuram — obstacles eka — one raśmi — rope, rein eka — one damanam — chariot driver eka — one nīḍam — sitting place dvi — two kūbaram — posts to which the harnesses are fixed pañca — five praharaṇam — weapons sapta — seven varūtham — coverings or ingredients of the body pañca — five vikramam — processes haima — golden upaskaram — ornaments āruhya — riding on svarṇa — golden varmā — armor akṣaya — inexhaustible iṣu-dhiḥ — quiver ekādaśa — eleven camū-nāthaḥ — commanders pañca — five prastham — destinations, objectives agāt — went vanam — to the forest.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ uvāca
Nārada said
sa ekadā maheṣvāso
saḥ
King Purañjana
ekadā
once upon a time
mahā-iṣvāsaḥ
carrying his strong bow and arrows
rathaṁ pañcāśvam āśu-gam
ratham
chariot
pañca-aśvam
five horses
āśu-gam
going very swiftly
dvīṣaṁ dvi-cakram ekākṣaṁ
dvi-īṣam
two arrows
dvi-cakram
two wheels
eka
one
akṣam
axle
tri-veṇuṁ pañca-bandhuram
tri
three
veṇum
flags
pañca
five
bandhuram
obstacles
eka-raśmy eka-damanam
eka
one
raśmi
rope, rein
eka
one
damanam
chariot driver
eka-nīḍaṁ dvi-kūbaram
eka
one
nīḍam
sitting place
dvi
two
kūbaram
posts to which the harnesses are fixed
pañca-praharaṇaṁ sapta-
pañca
five
praharaṇam
weapons
sapta
seven
varūthaṁ pañca-vikramam
varūtham
coverings or ingredients of the body
pañca
five
vikramam
processes
haimopaskaram āruhya
haima
golden
upaskaram
ornaments
āruhya
riding on
svarṇa-varmākṣayeṣudhiḥ
svarṇa
golden
varmā
armor
akṣaya
inexhaustible
iṣu-dhiḥ
quiver
ekādaśa-camū-nāthaḥ
ekādaśa
eleven
camū-nāthaḥ
commanders
pañca-prastham agād vanam
pañca
five
prastham
destinations, objectives
agāt
went
vanam
to the forest.
The great sage Nārada continued: My dear King, once upon a time King Purañjana took up his great bow, and equipped with golden armor and a quiver of unlimited arrows and accompanied by eleven commanders, he sat on his chariot driven by five swift horses and went to the forest named Pañca-prastha. He took with him in that chariot two explosive arrows. The chariot itself was situated on two wheels and one revolving axle. On the chariot were three flags, one rein, one chariot driver, one sitting place, two poles to which the harness was fixed, five weapons and seven coverings. The chariot moved in five different styles, and five obstacles lay before it. All the decorations of the chariot were made of gold.

These three verses explain how the material body of the living entity is under the control of the three qualities of the external energy. The body itself is the chariot, and the living entity is the owner of the body, as explained in Bhagavad-gītā (2.13) : dehino ’smin yathā dehe. The owner of the body is called the dehī, and he is situated within this body, specifically within the heart. The living entity is driven by one chariot driver. The chariot itself is made of three guṇas, three qualities of material nature, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (18.61) : yantrārūḍhāni māyayā. The word yantra means “carriage.” The body is given by material nature, and the driver of that body is Paramātmā, the Supersoul. The living entity is seated within the chariot. This is the actual position.

The living entity is always being influenced by the three qualities — sattva (goodness), rajas (passion) and tamas (ignorance). This is also confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (7.13) . Tribhir guṇa-mayair bhāvaiḥ: the living entity is bewildered by the three qualities of material nature. These three qualities are described in this verse as three flags. By a flag, one can come to know who the owner of the chariot is; similarly, by the influence of the three qualities of material nature, one can easily know the direction in which the chariot is moving. In other words, one who has eyes to see can understand how the body is being driven, influenced by the particular type of quality of material nature. In these three verses the activity of the living entity is described to prove how the body becomes influenced by the quality of ignorance, even when a person wants to be religious. Nārada Muni wanted to prove to King Prācīnabarhiṣat that the King was being influenced by the tamo-guṇa, the quality of ignorance, even though the King was supposed to be very religious.

According to karma-kāṇḍīya, the process of fruitive activities, a person performs various sacrifices directed by the Vedas, and in all those sacrifices animal killing, or experimenting on the life of animals to test the power of Vedic mantras, is enjoined. Animal-killing is certainly conducted under the influence of the mode of ignorance. Even though one may be religiously inclined, animal sacrifice is recommended in the śāstras, not only in the Vedas but even in the modern scriptures of other sects. These animal sacrifices are recommended in the name of religion, but actually animal sacrifice is meant for persons in the mode of ignorance. When such people kill animals, they can at least do so in the name of religion. However, when the religious system is transcendental, like the Vaiṣṇava religion, there is no place for animal sacrifice. Such a transcendental religious system is recommended by Kṛṣṇa in Bhagavad-gītā (18.66) :

sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ

“Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.” Because King Prācīnabarhiṣat was engaged in performing various sacrifices in which animals were killed, Nārada Muni pointed out that such sacrifices are influenced by the mode of ignorance. From the very beginning of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.1.2) it is said, dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavo ’tra: all kinds of religious systems that are involved in cheating are completely kicked out of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. In the bhagavad-dharma, the religion dealing with one’s relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, animal sacrifice is not recommended. In the performance of saṅkīrtana-yajña — Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare — there is no recommendation for animal sacrifices.

In these three verses, King Purañjana’s going to the forest to kill animals is symbolic of the living entity’s being driven by the mode of ignorance and thus engaging in different activities for sense gratification. The material body itself indicates that the living entity is already influenced by the three modes of material nature and that he is driven to enjoy material resources. When the body is influenced by the mode of ignorance, its infection becomes very acute. When it is influenced by the mode of passion, the infection is at the symptomatic stage. However, when the body is influenced by the mode of goodness, the materialistic infection becomes purified. The ritualistic ceremonies recommended in religious systems are certainly on the platform of goodness, but because within this material world even the mode of goodness is sometimes polluted by the other qualities, namely passion and ignorance, a man in goodness is sometimes driven by the influence of ignorance.

It is herein described that King Purañjana once went to the forest to kill animals. This means that he, the living entity, came under the influence of the mode of ignorance. The forest in which King Purañjana engaged in hunting was named Pañca-prastha. The word pañca means “five,” and this indicates the objects of the five senses. The body has five working senses, namely the hands, the legs, the tongue, the rectum and the genitals. By taking full advantage of these working senses, the body enjoys material life. The chariot is driven by five horses, which represent the five sense organs, namely the eyes, ears, nose, skin and tongue. These sense organs are very easily attracted by the sense objects. Consequently, the horses are described as moving swiftly. On the chariot King Purañjana kept two explosive weapons, which may be compared to ahaṅkāra, or false ego. This false ego is typified by two attitudes: “I am this body” ( ahantā ) and “Everything in my bodily relationships belongs to me” ( mamatā ).

The two wheels of the chariot may be compared to the two moving facilities, namely sinful life and religious life. The chariot is decorated with three flags, which represent the three modes of material nature. The five kinds of obstacles, or uneven roads, represent the five kinds of air passing within the body. These are prāṇa, apāna, udāna, samāna and vyāna. The body itself is covered by seven coverings, namely skin, muscle, fat, blood, marrow, bone and semen. The living entity is covered by three subtle material elements and five gross material elements. These are actually obstacles placed before the living entity on the path of liberation from material bondage.

The word raśmi, “rope,” in this verse indicates the mind. The word nīḍa is also significant, for nīḍa indicates the nest where a bird takes rest. In this case nīḍa is the heart, where the living entity is situated. The living entity sits in one place only. The causes of his bondage are two, namely lamentation and illusion. In material existence the living entity simply hankers to get something he can never get. Therefore he is in illusion. As a result of being in this illusory situation, the living entity is always lamenting. Thus lamentation and illusion are described herein as dvi-kūbara, the two posts of bondage.

The living entity carries out various desires through five different processes, which indicate the working of the five working senses. The golden ornaments and dress indicate that the living entity is influenced by the quality of rajo-guṇa, passion. One who has a good deal of money or riches is especially driven by the mode of passion. Being influenced by the mode of passion, one desires so many things for enjoyment in this material world. The eleven commanders represent the ten senses and the mind. The mind is always making plans with the ten commanders to enjoy the material world. The forest named Pañca-prastha, where the King went to hunt, is the forest of the five sense objects: form, taste, sound, smell and touch. Thus in these three verses Nārada Muni describes the position of the material body and the encagement of the living entity within it.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Once upon a time, the King took up his great bow, and equipped with golden armor and an inexhaustible quiver, accompanied by a commander among eleven, he sat on his chariot driven by five swift horses and went to the forest. The gold chariot had two shafts, two wheels, one axle, three flags, five supports, one rein, one chariot driver, one sitting place, two poles to which the yoke was fixed, five weapons and seven protective coverings. The chariot of widespread exploits moved to five destinations. In the Twenty-sixth Chapter, the jīva gives up proper intelligence by the influence of tamas and then regains it. Though the jīva has discrimination and a sense of dharma, by fate, at some time of other, by the arousal of tamas, he loses his discrimination and becomes attached to forbidden objects. This is shown by describing the body, greedy for enjoyment, as a chariot. The King, at one time, got on the chariot and went to the forest towards five destinations. Three verses are one sentence. He had a bow. This indicates his absorption in being the doer and enjoyer. The five horses are the five knowledge senses, which travel quickly. There are two shafts on the chariot (dvīṣam), ego and possessiveness, and there are two wheels, sinful and pious acts. It has one axel, pradhāna, and three flags or guṇas. It has five supports (bandhuram), the five life airs. It has one rein, the mind and one driver, the intelligence. There is one seat, the heart. There are two shafts for binding the yoke, namely lamentation and illusion. There are five weapons, the activities of the five (knowledge) senses such as hearing. There are seven protective coverings on the chariot, the seven dhātus. Pañca-vikrama means widespread exploits. Pañca can mean widespread as well as five from the root pac. This refers to the actions of the five action senses. It is covered in gold (haima). The other meaning is the jīva has many material coverings as one puts on clothing to keep warm in winter (another meaning of haima). The golden armor is the protection of rajoguṇa. The inexhaustible quiver means infinite desires. He has eleven commanders. The eleventh commander is mind. The mind is called the reins because of its desires or impressions, but is called the commander because of its power to make decisions. He went to a place called Pañcaprastha, which means articles containing the five sense objects. Prasthā means a plateau or plain.
Purañjana with bow, gold armor, eleven commanders and five-horse chariot went hunting in Pañca-prastha. The body is chariot, soul is rider; under the modes one goes hunting — destruction in the name of sport.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'hunting trip' am I currently on under the influence of the modes?
  • Where am I confusing recreation with destruction?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.4

↗
चचार मृगयां तत्र द‍ृप्त आत्तेषुकार्मुक: । विहाय जायामतदर्हां मृगव्यसनलालस: ॥ ४ ॥
cacāra mṛgayāṁ tatra
[chachaara mrigayaam tatra]
dṛpta ātteṣu-kārmukaḥ
[dripta aatteshu-kaarmukah]
vihāya jāyām atad-arhāṁ
[vihaaya jaayaam atad-arhaam]
mṛga-vyasana-lālasaḥ
[mriga-vyasana-laalasah]
cacāra — executed mṛgayām — hunting tatra — there dṛptaḥ — being proud ātta — having taken iṣu — arrows kārmukaḥ — bow vihāya — giving up jāyām — his wife a-tat-arhām — although impossible mṛga — hunting vyasana — evil activities lālasaḥ — being inspired by.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
cacāra mṛgayāṁ tatra
cacāra
executed
mṛgayām
hunting
tatra
there
dṛpta ātteṣu-kārmukaḥ
dṛptaḥ
being proud
ātta
having taken
iṣu
arrows
kārmukaḥ
bow
vihāya jāyām atad-arhāṁ
vihāya
giving up
jāyām
his wife
a-tat-arhām
although impossible
mṛga-vyasana-lālasaḥ
mṛga
hunting
vyasana
evil activities
lālasaḥ
being inspired by.
It was almost impossible for King Purañjana to give up the company of his Queen even for a moment. Nonetheless, on that day, being very much inspired by the desire to hunt, he took up his bow and arrow with great pride and went to the forest, not caring for his wife.

One form of hunting is known as woman-hunting. A conditioned soul is never satisfied with one wife. Those whose senses are very much uncontrolled especially try to hunt for many women. King Purañjana’s abandoning the company of his religiously married wife is representative of the conditioned soul’s attempt to hunt for many women for sense gratification. Wherever a king goes, he is supposed to be accompanied by his queen, but when the king, or conditioned soul, becomes greatly overpowered by the desire for sense gratification, he does not care for religious principles. Instead, with great pride, he accepts the bow and arrow of attachment and hatred. Our consciousness is always working in two ways — the right way and the wrong way. When one becomes too proud of his position, influenced by the mode of passion, he gives up the right path and accepts the wrong one. Kṣatriya kings are sometimes advised to go to the forest to hunt ferocious animals just to learn how to kill, but such forays are never meant for sense gratification. Killing animals to eat their flesh is forbidden for human beings.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Fond of hunting, giving up his wife who was difficult to give up, full of pride, he took his bow and arrow and went to hunt in the forest. Hunting means the sin of going out to find another woman. His arrows are attachment and repulsion etc. His bow is absorption in enjoyment. His wife is intelligence possessing qualities of dharma.
Though he could not leave his queen for a moment, today he proudly went hunting without her. Even the most attached souls periodically leave intelligence to chase unguided impulse.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'queen' (steady wisdom) am I tempted to bypass for an impulsive expedition?
  • Where does pride convince me I don't need the steadying companion today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.5

↗
आसुरीं वृत्तिमाश्रित्य घोरात्मा निरनुग्रह: । न्यहनन्निशितैर्बाणैर्वनेषु वनगोचरान् ॥ ५ ॥
āsurīṁ vṛttim āśritya
[aasureem vrittim aashritya]
ghorātmā niranugrahaḥ
[ghoraatmaa niranugrahah]
nyahanan niśitair bāṇair
[nyahanan nishitair baanair]
vaneṣu vana-gocarān
[vaneshu vana-gocharaan]
āsurīm — demoniac vṛttim — occupation āśritya — taken shelter of ghora — horrible ātmā — consciousness, heart niranugrahaḥ — without mercy nyahanat — killed niśitaiḥ — by sharp bāṇaiḥ — arrows vaneṣu — in the forests vana-gocarān — the forest animals.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āsurīṁ vṛttim āśritya
āsurīm
demoniac
vṛttim
occupation
āśritya
taken shelter of
ghorātmā niranugrahaḥ
ghora
horrible
ātmā
consciousness, heart
niranugrahaḥ
without mercy
nyahanan niśitair bāṇair
nyahanat
killed
niśitaiḥ
by sharp
bāṇaiḥ
arrows
vaneṣu vana-gocarān
vaneṣu
in the forests
vana-gocarān
the forest animals.
At that time King Purañjana was very much influenced by demoniac propensities. Because of this, his heart became very hard and merciless, and with sharp arrows he killed many innocent animals in the forest, taking no consideration.

When a man becomes too proud of his material position, he tries to enjoy his senses in an unrestricted way, being influenced by the modes of passion and ignorance. He is thus described as asuric, or demoniac. When people are demoniac in spirit, they are not merciful toward the poor animals. Consequently, they maintain various animal slaughterhouses. This is technically called sūnā, or hiṁsā, which means the killing of living beings. In Kali-yuga, due to the increase of the modes of passion and ignorance, almost all men are asuric, or demoniac; therefore they are very much fond of eating flesh, and for this end they maintain various kinds of animal slaughterhouses.

In this Age of Kali the propensity for mercy is almost nil. Consequently there is always fighting and wars between men and nations. Men do not understand that because they unrestrictedly kill so many animals, they also must be slaughtered like animals in big wars. This is very much evident in the Western countries. In the West, slaughterhouses are maintained without restriction, and therefore every fifth or tenth year there is a big war in which countless people are slaughtered even more cruelly than the animals. Sometimes during war, soldiers keep their enemies in concentration camps and kill them in very cruel ways. These are reactions brought about by unrestricted animal-killing in the slaughterhouse and by hunters in the forest. Proud, demoniac persons do not know the laws of nature, or the laws of God. Consequently, they unrestrictedly kill poor animals, not caring for them at all. In the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, animal-killing is completely prohibited. One is not accepted as a bona fide student in this movement unless he promises to follow the four regulative principles: no animal-killing, no intoxication, no illicit sex and no gambling. This Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is the only means by which the sinful activities of men in this Kali-yuga can be counteracted.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Taking shelter of demonic tendencies, with vicious heart, without compassion, he killed wild animals with his sharp arrows. He began sinful activities including violence using his arrows of attachment and repulsion.
Demonic propensities hardened his heart; he killed many innocent animals without consideration. Cruelty escalates when intelligence is left at home; soft heart needs daily companionship to stay soft.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has my heart hardened in seasons I left wisdom at home?
  • What single innocent thing am I about to wound today without consideration?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.6

↗
तीर्थेषु प्रतिद‍ृष्टेषु राजा मेध्यान् पशून् वने । यावदर्थमलं लुब्धो हन्यादिति नियम्यते ॥ ६ ॥
tīrtheṣu pratidṛṣṭeṣu
[teertheshu pratidrishteshu]
rājā medhyān paśūn vane
[raajaa medhyaan pashoon vane]
yāvad-artham alaṁ lubdho
[yaavad-artham alam lubdho]
hanyād iti niyamyate
[hanyaad iti niyamyate]
tīrtheṣu — in holy places pratidṛṣṭeṣu — according to the direction of the Vedas rājā — a king medhyān — fit for sacrifice paśūn — animals vane — in the forest yāvat — so much as artham — required alam — not more than that lubdhaḥ — being greedy hanyāt — one may kill iti — thus niyamyate — it is regulated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tīrtheṣu pratidṛṣṭeṣu
tīrtheṣu
in holy places
pratidṛṣṭeṣu
according to the direction of the Vedas
rājā medhyān paśūn vane
rājā
a king
medhyān
fit for sacrifice
paśūn
animals
vane
in the forest
yāvad-artham alaṁ lubdho
yāvat
so much as
artham
required
alam
not more than that
lubdhaḥ
being greedy
hanyād iti niyamyate
hanyāt
one may kill
iti
thus
niyamyate
it is regulated.
If a king is too attracted to eating flesh, he may, according to the directions of the revealed scriptures on sacrificial performances, go to the forest and kill some animals that are recommended for killing. One is not allowed to kill animals unnecessarily or without restrictions. The Vedas regulate animal-killing to stop the extravagance of foolish men influenced by the modes of passion and ignorance.

The question may be raised why a living being should be restricted in sense gratification. If a king, to learn how to kill, may go to the forest and kill animals, why should a living entity, who has been given senses, not be allowed unrestricted sense gratification? At the present moment this argument is put forward even by so-called svāmīs and yogīs who publicly say that because we have senses we must satisfy them by sense gratification. These foolish svāmīs and yogīs, however, do not know the injunctions of the śāstras. Indeed, sometimes these rascals come out to defy the śāstras. They even publicly announce that there should be no more śāstras, no more books. “Just come to me,” they say, “and I shall touch you, and you will become immediately spiritually advanced.”

Because demoniac people want to be cheated, so many cheaters are present to cheat them. At the present moment in this Age of Kali-yuga, the entire human society has become an assembly of cheaters and cheated. For this reason the Vedic scriptures have given us the proper directions for sense gratification. Everyone is inclined in this age to eat meat and fish, drink liquor and indulge in sex life, but according to the Vedic injunctions sex is allowed only in marriage, meat-eating is allowed only when the animal is killed and offered before the goddess Kālī, and intoxication is allowed only in a restricted way. In this verse the word niyamyate indicates that all these things — namely animal-killing, intoxication and sex — should be regulated.

Regulations are meant for human beings, not for animals. The traffic regulations on the street, telling people to keep to the right or the left, are meant for human beings, not for animals. If an animal violates such a law, he is never punished, but a human being is punished. The Vedas are not meant for the animals, but for the understanding of human society. A person who indiscriminately violates the rules and regulations given by the Vedas is liable to be punished. One should therefore not enjoy his senses according to his lusty desires, but should restrict himself according to the regulative principles given in the Vedas. If a king is allowed to hunt in a forest, it is not for his sense gratification. We cannot simply experiment in the art of killing. If a king, being afraid to meet rogues and thieves, kills poor animals and eats their flesh comfortably at home, he must lose his position. Because in this age kings have such demoniac propensities, monarchy is abolished by the laws of nature in every country.

People have become so degraded in this age that on the one hand they restrict polygamy and on the other hand they hunt for women in so many ways. Many business concerns publicly advertise that topless girls are available in this club or in that shop. Thus women have become instruments of sense enjoyment in modern society. The Vedas enjoin, however, that if a man has the propensity to enjoy more than one wife — as is sometimes the propensity for men in the higher social order, such as the brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas, and even sometimes the śūdras — he is allowed to marry more than one wife. Marriage means taking complete charge of a woman and living peacefully without debauchery. At the present moment, however, debauchery is unrestricted. Nonetheless, society makes a law that one should not marry more than one wife. This is typical of a demoniac society.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A king, greedy for meat, may kill animals suitable sacrifice, for special śrāddha rites only, only in the forest, and only as much as necessary, and not more. This is how hunting is regulated in the scriptures. “But the king was allowed to hunt according to scripture. And, from the spiritual point of view, because the jīva is an enjoyer, he should enjoy sense objects. Why criticize him?” Three verses answer. The meaning is this. Hunting is not allowed simply because one is passionate. It is restricted. The tendency is limited. Six rules are shown. If he is very attached to eating meat (alam lubdhaḥ), he can hunt. But it should be for śrāddha rites (tīrtheṣu), on special occasions (śruti-dṛsṭeṣu), [Note: This seems to be a different version. ] not daily śrāddha rites. Only the king can do this. Only animals suitable for sacrifice should be killed. This should be done only in the forest, and only when required. Similarly the jīva is allowed enjoyment of the sense objects as much as necessary, but not to the fullest extent.
Even flesh-eating kings can hunt only certain animals by scriptural sanction; unnecessary killing isn't allowed. The Vedas regulate even harmful indulgences; ungoverned indulgence isn't tradition, it's defiance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I justify ungoverned indulgence as 'tradition' when even tradition would regulate it?
  • Which licensed-but-unlimited claim am I making for myself?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.7

↗
य एवं कर्म नियतं विद्वान् कुर्वीत मानव: । कर्मणा तेन राजेन्द्र ज्ञानेन न स लिप्यते ॥ ७ ॥
ya evaṁ karma niyataṁ
[ya evam karma niyatam]
vidvān kurvīta mānavaḥ
[vidvaan kurveeta maanavah]
karmaṇā tena rājendra
[karmanaa tena raajendra]
jñānena na sa lipyate
[jnaanena na sa lipyate]
yaḥ — anyone who evam — thus karma — activities niyatam — regulated vidvān — learned kurvīta — should perform mānavaḥ — a human being karmaṇā — by such activities tena — by this rāja-indra — O King jñānena — by advancement of knowledge na — never saḥ — he lipyate — becomes involved.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ya evaṁ karma niyataṁ
yaḥ
anyone who
evam
thus
karma
activities
niyatam
regulated
vidvān kurvīta mānavaḥ
vidvān
learned
kurvīta
should perform
mānavaḥ
a human being
karmaṇā tena rājendra
karmaṇā
by such activities
tena
by this
rāja-indra
O King
jñānena na sa lipyate
jñānena
by advancement of knowledge
na
never
saḥ
he
lipyate
becomes involved.
Nārada Muni continued to speak to King Prācīnabarhiṣat: My dear King, any person who works according to the directions of the Vedic scriptures does not become involved in fruitive activities.

Just as a government may issue trade licenses in order for its citizens to act in a certain way, the Vedas contain injunctions that restrain and regulate all of our fruitive activities. All living entities have come into this material world to enjoy themselves. Consequently, the Vedas are given to regulate sense enjoyment. One who enjoys his senses under the Vedic regulative principles does not become entangled in the actions and reactions of his activities. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (3.9) , yajñārthāt karmaṇaḥ: one should act only for the performance of yajña, or to satisfy Lord Viṣṇu. Anyatra loko ’yaṁ karma-bandhanaḥ: otherwise any action will produce a reaction by which the living entity will be bound. A human being is especially meant to attain liberation from the bondage of birth, death, old age and disease. He is therefore directed by the Vedic regulative principles to work in such a way that he may fulfill his desires for sense gratification and at the same time gradually become freed from material bondage. Action according to such principles is called knowledge. Indeed, the word veda means “knowledge.” The words jñānena na sa lipyate indicate that by following the Vedic principles, one does not become involved in the actions and reactions of his fruitive activities.

Everyone is therefore advised to act in terms of the Vedic injunctions and not irresponsibly. When a person within a state acts according to the laws and licenses of the government, he does not become involved in criminal activities. Man-made laws, however, are always defective because they are made by men who are prone to committing mistakes, being illusioned, cheating and having imperfect senses. The Vedic instructions are different because they do not have these four defects. Vedic instructions are not subject to mistakes. The knowledge of the Vedas is knowledge received directly from God, and there is consequently no question of illusion, cheating, mistakes or imperfect senses. All Vedic knowledge is perfect because it is received directly from God by the paramparā, disciplic succession. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.1.1) it is said, tene brahma hṛdā ya ādi-kavaye: the original creature of this universe, known as the ādi-kavi, or Lord Brahmā, was instructed by Kṛṣṇa through the heart. After receiving these Vedic instructions from Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself, Brahmā distributed the knowledge by the paramparā system to Nārada, and Nārada in turn distributed the knowledge to Vyāsa. In this way Vedic knowledge is perfect. If we act according to Vedic knowledge, there is no question of being involved in sinful activities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Any learned person who acts according to regulations is never contaminated by that action which arises from knowledge. He is not contaminated by that action arising from knowledge.
One who works per Vedic directions doesn't get bound by fruitive activity. The rules aren't restrictive overhead; they're the path out of bondage.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I treat rule-following as the obstacle when scripture treats it as the route?
  • Which Vedic direction would actually free me if I observed it for a season?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.8

↗
अन्यथा कर्म कुर्वाणो मानारूढो निबध्यते । गुणप्रवाहपतितो नष्टप्रज्ञो व्रजत्यध: ॥ ८ ॥
anyathā karma kurvāṇo
[anyathaa karma kurvaano]
mānārūḍho nibadhyate
[maanaaroodho nibadhyate]
guṇa-pravāha-patito
[guna-pravaaha-patito]
naṣṭa-prajño vrajaty adhaḥ
[nashta-prajno vrajaty adhah]
anyathā — otherwise karma — fruitive activities kurvāṇaḥ — while acting māna-ārūḍhaḥ — being influenced by false prestige nibadhyate — one becomes entangled guṇa-pravāha — by the influence of the material qualities patitaḥ — fallen naṣṭa-prajñaḥ — bereft of all intelligence vrajati — thus he goes adhaḥ — down.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anyathā karma kurvāṇo
anyathā
otherwise
karma
fruitive activities
kurvāṇaḥ
while acting
mānārūḍho nibadhyate
māna-ārūḍhaḥ
being influenced by false prestige
nibadhyate
one becomes entangled
guṇa-pravāha-patito
guṇa-pravāha
by the influence of the material qualities
patitaḥ
fallen
naṣṭa-prajño vrajaty adhaḥ
naṣṭa-prajñaḥ
bereft of all intelligence
vrajati
thus he goes
adhaḥ
down.
Otherwise, a person who acts whimsically falls down due to false prestige. Thus he becomes involved in the laws of nature, which are composed of the three qualities [goodness, passion and ignorance]. In this way a living entity becomes devoid of his real intelligence and becomes perpetually lost in the cycle of birth and death. Thus he goes up and down from a microbe in stool to a high position in the Brahmaloka planet.

There are many important words in this verse. The first is anyathā, “otherwise,” which indicates one who does not care for the Vedic rules and regulations. The rules and regulations laid down in the Vedas are called śāstra-vidhi. Bhagavad-gītā clearly states that one who does not accept the śāstra-vidhi, or rules and regulations mentioned in the Vedic scriptures, and acts whimsically or puffed up with false pride never attains perfection in this life, nor does he attain happiness or liberation from the material condition:

yaḥ śāstra-vidhim utsṛjya vartate kāma-kārataḥ na sa siddhim avāpnoti na sukhaṁ na parāṁ gatim

“He who discards scriptural injunctions and acts according to his own whims attains neither perfection nor happiness nor the supreme destination.” ( Bg. 16.23 ) Thus one who is deliberately transgressing the rules and regulations of the śāstras is simply involving himself more and more in material existence in the three modes of material nature. Human society should therefore follow the Vedic principles of life, which are summarized in Bhagavad-gītā. Otherwise life in material existence will continue. Foolish persons do not know that the soul is passing through 8,400,000 species of life. By the gradual process of evolution, when one comes to the human form of life, he is supposed to follow the rules and regulations laid down in the Vedas. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu says that the living entity, since time immemorial, is suffering the threefold miseries of material nature due to his demoniac attitude, which is his spirit of revolt against the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Kṛṣṇa also confirms this in Bhagavad-gītā (15.7) :

mamaivāṁśo jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ manaḥ-ṣaṣṭhānīndriyāṇi prakṛti-sthāni karṣati

“The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal fragmental parts. Due to conditioned life, they are struggling very hard with the six senses, which include the mind.” Every living entity is part and parcel of God. There is no reason for the living entity’s being put into the miserable threefold condition of material existence but that he voluntarily accepts material existence on the false pretext of becoming an enjoyer. To save him from this horrible condition, the Lord has given all the Vedic literatures in His incarnation of Vyāsadeva. It is therefore said:

kṛṣṇa bhuli’ sei jīva anādi-bahirmukha ataeva māyā tāre deya saṁsāra-duḥkha

“By forgetting Kṛṣṇa, the living entity has become materialistic since time immemorial. Therefore the illusory energy of Kṛṣṇa is giving him different types of miseries in material existence.” ( Cc. Madhya 20.117)

māyā-mugdha jīvera nāhi svataḥ kṛṣṇa-jñāna jīvere kṛpāya kailā kṛṣṇa veda-purāṇa

“When a living entity is enchanted by the external energy, he cannot revive his original Kṛṣṇa consciousness independently. Due to such circumstances, Kṛṣṇa has kindly given him the Vedic literatures, such as the four Vedas and eighteen Purāṇas. ” ( Cc. Madhya 20.122) Every human being should therefore take advantage of the Vedic instructions; otherwise one will be bound by his whimsical activities and will be without any guide.

The word mānārūḍhaḥ is also very significant in this verse. Under the pretext of becoming great philosophers and scientists, men throughout the whole world are working on the mental platform. Such men are generally nondevotees, due to not caring for the instructions given by the Lord to the first living creature, Lord Brahmā. The Bhāgavatam (5.18.12) therefore says:

harāv abhaktasya kuto mahad-guṇā mano-rathenāsati dhāvato bahiḥ

A person who is a nondevotee has no good qualifications because he acts on the mental platform. One who acts on the mental platform has to change his standard of knowledge periodically. We consequently see that one philosopher may disagree with another philosopher, and one scientist may put forward a theory contradicting the theory of another scientist. All of this is due to their working on the mental platform without a standard of knowledge. In the Vedic instructions, however, the standard of knowledge is accepted, even though it may sometimes appear that the statements are contradictory. Because the Vedas are the standard of knowledge, even though they may appear contradictory, they should be accepted. If one does not accept them, he will be bound by the material conditions.

The material conditions are described in this verse as guṇa-pravāha, the flowing of the three modes of material nature. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura therefore says in a song, miche māyāra vaśe, yāccha bhese’, khāccha hābuḍubu, bhāi: “Why are you suffering? Why are you sometimes being drowned in the waves of material nature and sometimes coming to the surface?” Jīva kṛṣṇa-dāsa, e viśvāsa, karle ta’ āra duḥkha nāi: “Please therefore accept yourself as the servant of Kṛṣṇa. Then you will be freed from all miseries.” As soon as one surrenders to Kṛṣṇa and accepts the perfect standard of knowledge, which is Bhagavad-gītā as it is, he then comes out of the material modes of nature and does not fall down and lose his knowledge.

Naṣṭa-prajñaḥ. The word prajña means “perfect knowledge,” and naṣṭa-prajña means “one who has no perfect knowledge.” One who does not have perfect knowledge has only mental speculation. By such mental speculation one falls down and down into a hellish condition of life. By transgressing the laws laid down in the śāstras, one cannot become pure in heart. When one’s heart is not purified, one acts according to the three material modes of nature. These activities are very nicely explained in verses 1 through 6 of the Seventeenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā. Bhagavad-gītā (2.45) further explains:

traiguṇya-viṣayā vedā nistraiguṇyo bhavārjuna nirdvandvo nitya-sattva-stho niryoga-kṣema ātmavān

“The Vedas mainly deal with the subject of the three modes of material nature. Rise above these modes, O Arjuna. Be transcendental to all of them. Be free from all dualities and from all anxieties for gain and safety, and be established in the Self.” The entire world and all material knowledge is within the three modes of material nature. One has to transcend these modes, and to attain that platform of transcendence one must follow the instruction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and thus become perfect in life. Otherwise one will be knocked down by the waves of the material nature’s three modes. This is further explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (7.5.30) in the words of Prahlāda Mahārāja:

matir na kṛṣṇe parataḥ svato vā mitho ’bhipadyeta gṛha-vratānām adānta-gobhir viśatāṁ tamisraṁ punaḥ punaś carvita-carvaṇānām

Materialistic persons, who are too much engaged in material enjoyment and who do not know anything beyond their material experiences, are carried by the whims of material nature. They live a life characterized by chewing the chewed, and they are controlled by their uncontrolled senses. Thus they go down to the darkest regions of hellish life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If he performs unregulated actions, he then thinks himself the doer, and becomes bound by those actions. Falling under the influence by the guṇas, he loses his intelligence, and sinks down. If he breaks the rules (anyathā), because of lack of purity in the antaḥkaraṇa, he begins to think of himself as the doer. He then becomes bound by the actions. Then he falls under the influence of the guṇas and goes downwards. Spiritually speaking, this verse describes the jīva’s enjoyment of objects of forbidden by scriptures.
Related verses
Whimsical action through false prestige drops the actor into modes and modes' bondage; real intelligence is lost. Without anchoring rules, even smart people get lost in mode-traffic.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has whimsy in me consumed actual intelligence I started with?
  • What rule could I adopt that would restore intelligence to action?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.9

↗
तत्र निर्भिन्नगात्राणां चित्रवाजै: शिलीमुखै: । विप्लवोऽभूद्दु:खितानां दु:सह: करुणात्मनाम् ॥ ९ ॥
tatra nirbhinna-gātrāṇāṁ
[tatra nirbhinna-gaatraanaam]
citra-vājaiḥ śilīmukhaiḥ
[chitra-vaajaih shileemukhaih]
viplavo ’bhūd duḥkhitānāṁ
[viplavo ’bhood duhkhitaanaam]
duḥsahaḥ karuṇātmanām
[duhsahah karunaatmanaam]
tatra — there nirbhinna — being pierced gātrāṇām — whose bodies citra-vājaiḥ — with variegated feathers śilī-mukhaiḥ — by the arrows viplavaḥ — destruction abhūt — was done duḥkhitānām — of the most aggrieved duḥsahaḥ — unbearable karuṇa-ātmanām — for persons who are very merciful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra nirbhinna-gātrāṇāṁ
tatra
there
nirbhinna
being pierced
gātrāṇām
whose bodies
citra-vājaiḥ śilīmukhaiḥ
citra-vājaiḥ
with variegated feathers
śilī-mukhaiḥ
by the arrows
viplavo ’bhūd duḥkhitānāṁ
viplavaḥ
destruction
abhūt
was done
duḥkhitānām
of the most aggrieved
duḥsahaḥ karuṇātmanām
duḥsahaḥ
unbearable
karuṇa-ātmanām
for persons who are very merciful.
When King Purañjana was hunting in this way, many animals within the forest lost their lives with great pain, being pierced by the sharp arrowheads. Upon seeing these devastating, ghastly activities performed by the King, all the people who were merciful by nature became very unhappy. Such merciful persons could not tolerate seeing all this killing.

When demoniac persons engage in animal-killing, the demigods, or devotees of the Lord, are very much afflicted by this killing. Demoniac civilizations in this modern age maintain various types of slaughterhouses all over the world. Rascal svāmīs and yogīs encourage foolish persons to go on eating flesh and killing animals and at the same time continue their so-called meditation and mystical practices. All these affairs are ghastly, and a compassionate person, namely a devotee of the Lord, becomes very unhappy to see such a sight. The hunting process is also carried on in a different way, as we have already explained. Hunting women, drinking different types of liquor, becoming intoxicated, killing animals and enjoying sex all serve as the basis of modern civilization. Vaiṣṇavas are unhappy to see such a situation in the world, and therefore they are very busy spreading this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement.

The devotees are pained to see the hunting and killing of animals in the forest, the wholesale slaughter of animals in the slaughterhouses, and the exploitation of young girls in brothels that function under different names as clubs and societies. Being very much compassionate upon the killing of animals in sacrifice, the great sage Nārada began his instructions to King Prācīnabarhiṣat. In these instructions, Nārada Muni explained that devotees like him are very much afflicted by all the killing that goes on in human society. Not only are saintly persons afflicted by this killing, but even God Himself is afflicted and therefore comes down in the incarnation of Lord Buddha. Jayadeva Gosvāmī therefore sings, sadaya-hṛdaya-darśita-paśu-ghātam: simply to stop the killing of animals, Lord Buddha compassionately appeared. Some rascals put forward the theory that an animal has no soul or is something like dead stone. In this way they rationalize that there is no sin in animal-killing. Actually animals are not dead stone, but the killers of animals are stonehearted. Consequently no reason or philosophy appeals to them. They continue keeping slaughterhouses and killing animals in the forest. The conclusion is that one who does not care for the instructions of saintly persons like Nārada and his disciplic succession surely falls into the category of naṣṭa-prajña and thus goes to hell.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This killing of animals who suffered with limbs pierced by his feathered arrows in the forest was unbearable for those with compassion. After discussing a side issue, the story continues. The killing (viplavaḥ) by arrows (vicitra-vājaiḥ) was unbearable. The hint of Nārada is “Committing sin such as violence by senses filled with various faults is intolerable for persons like us with compassion. Therefore you are being informed.”
Animals died in great pain; compassionate witnesses became unhappy. Devotees are pained by demoniac killing; their pain is real, even if uninvited.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose compassionate pain at my actions have I disregarded as squeamishness?
  • Where do I treat saintly grief as soft when it's actually accurate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.10

↗
शशान् वराहान् महिषान् गवयान् रुरुशल्यकान् । मेध्यानन्यांश्च विविधान् विनिघ्नन् श्रममध्यगात् ॥ १० ॥
śaśān varāhān mahiṣān
[shashaan varaahaan mahishaan]
gavayān ruru-śalyakān
[gavayaan ruru-shalyakaan]
medhyān anyāṁś ca vividhān
[medhyaan anyaamsh cha vividhaan]
vinighnan śramam adhyagāt
[vinighnan shramam adhyagaat]
śaśān — rabbits varāhān — boars mahiṣān — buffalo gavayān — bison ruru — black deer śalyakān — porcupines medhyān — game animals anyān — others ca — and vividhān — various vinighnan — by killing śramam adhyagāt — became very tired.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaśān varāhān mahiṣān
śaśān
rabbits
varāhān
boars
mahiṣān
buffalo
gavayān ruru-śalyakān
gavayān
bison
ruru
black deer
śalyakān
porcupines
medhyān anyāṁś ca vividhān
medhyān
game animals
anyān
others
ca
and
vividhān
various
vinighnan śramam adhyagāt
vinighnan
by killing
śramam adhyagāt
became very tired.
In this way King Purañjana killed many animals, including rabbits, boars, buffalo, bison, black deer, porcupines and other game animals. After killing and killing, the King became very tired.

A person in the mode of ignorance commits many sinful activities. In the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu, Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī explains that a man becomes sinful out of ignorance only. The resultant effect of sinful life is suffering. Those who are not in knowledge, who commit violations of the standard laws, are subject to be punished under criminal laws. Similarly, the laws of nature are very stringent. If a child touches fire without knowing the effect, he must be burned, even though he is only a child. If a child violates the law of nature, there is no compassion. Only through ignorance does a person violate the laws of nature, and when he comes to knowledge he does not commit any more sinful acts.

The King became tired after killing so many animals. When a man comes in contact with a saintly person, he becomes aware of the stringent laws of nature and thus becomes a religious person. Irreligious persons are like animals, but in this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement such persons can come to a sense of understanding things as they are and abandon the four principles of prohibited activities, namely illicit sex life, meat-eating, gambling and intoxication. This is the beginning of religious life. Those who are so-called religious and indulge in these four principles of prohibited activities are pseudoreligionists. Religious life and sinful activity cannot parallel one another. If one is serious in accepting a religious life, or the path of salvation, he must adhere to the four basic rules and regulations. However sinful a man may be, if he receives knowledge from the proper spiritual master and repents his past activities in his sinful life and stops them, he immediately becomes eligible to return home, back to Godhead. This is made possible just by following the rules and regulations given by the śāstra and following the bona fide spiritual master.

At present the whole world is on the verge of retiring from a blind materialistic civilization, which may be likened to hunting animals in the forest. People should take advantage of this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement and leave their troublesome life of killing. It is said that the killers of animals should neither live nor die. If they live only to kill animals and enjoy women, life is not very prosperous. And as soon as a killer dies, he enters the cycle of birth and death in the lower species of life. That also is not desirable. The conclusion is that killers should retire from the killing business and take to this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement to make life perfect. A confused, frustrated man cannot get relief by committing suicide because suicide will simply lead him to take birth in the lower species of life or to remain a ghost, unable to attain a gross material body. Therefore the perfect course is to retire altogether from sinful activities and take up Kṛṣṇa consciousness. In this way one can become completely perfect and go back home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After killing rabbits, boars, buffalos, wild cows, antelopes and porcupines, suitable for sacrifice, he became tired. He became tired. The jīva with some tendencies of dharma by good fortune may repent after committing sins for some time.
Rabbits, boars, buffalo, bison, deer, porcupines — many killed; the king grew tired. Indulgence in ignorance eventually exhausts itself; even villainy has fatigue.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I exhausted from indulgence and pretending it's just hard work?
  • What does the body's signal of fatigue tell me about what I've been doing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.11

↗
तत: क्षुत्तृट्परिश्रान्तो निवृत्तो गृहमेयिवान् । कृतस्‍नानोचिताहार: संविवेश गतक्लम: ॥ ११ ॥
tataḥ kṣut-tṛṭ-pariśrānto
[tatah kshut-trit-parishraanto]
nivṛtto gṛham eyivān
[nivritto griham eyivaan]
kṛta-snānocitāhāraḥ
[krita-snaanochitaahaarah]
saṁviveśa gata-klamaḥ
[samvivesha gata-klamah]
tataḥ — thereafter kṣut — by hunger tṛṭ — thirst pariśrāntaḥ — being too fatigued nivṛttaḥ — having ceased gṛham eyivān — came back to his home kṛta — taken snāna — bath ucita-āhāraḥ — exactly required foodstuffs saṁviveśa — took rest gata-klamaḥ — freed from all fatigue.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ kṣut-tṛṭ-pariśrānto
tataḥ
thereafter
kṣut
by hunger
tṛṭ
thirst
pariśrāntaḥ
being too fatigued
nivṛtto gṛham eyivān
nivṛttaḥ
having ceased
gṛham eyivān
came back to his home
kṛta-snānocitāhāraḥ
kṛta
taken
snāna
bath
ucita-āhāraḥ
exactly required foodstuffs
saṁviveśa gata-klamaḥ
saṁviveśa
took rest
gata-klamaḥ
freed from all fatigue.
After this, the King, very much fatigued, hungry and thirsty, returned to his royal palace. After returning, he took a bath and had an appropriate dinner. Then he took rest and thus became freed from all restlessness.

A materialistic person works throughout the whole week very, very hard. He is always asking, “Where is money? Where is money?” Then, at the end of the week, he wants to retire from these activities and go to some secluded place to rest. King Purañjana returned to his home because he was very much fatigued from hunting animals in the forest. In this way his conscience came to stop him from committing further sinful activities and make him return home. In Bhagavad-gītā materialistic persons are described as duṣkṛtinaḥ, which indicates those who are always engaged in sinful activities. When a person comes to his senses and understands how he is engaging in sinful activities, he returns to his conscience, which is herein figuratively described as the palace. Generally a materialistic person is infected by the material modes of passion and ignorance. The results of passion and ignorance are lust and greed. In the life of a materialist, activity means working in lust and greed. However, when he comes to his senses, he wants to retire. According to Vedic civilization, such retirement is positively recommended, and this portion of life is called vānaprastha. Retirement is absolutely necessary for a materialist who wants to become free from the activities of a sinful life.

King Purañjana’s coming home, taking bath and having an appropriate dinner indicate that a materialistic person must retire from sinful activities and become purified by accepting a spiritual master and hearing from him about the values of life. If one would do this, he would feel completely refreshed, just as one feels after taking a bath. After receiving initiation from a bona fide spiritual master, one must abandon all kinds of sinful activities, namely illicit sex, intoxication, gambling and meat-eating.

The word ucitāhāraḥ used in this verse is important. Ucita means “appropriate.” One must eat appropriately and not take after food as hogs take after stool. For a human being there are eatables described in Bhagavad-gītā (17.8) as sāttvika-āhāra, or food in the mode of goodness. One should not indulge in eating food in the modes of passion and ignorance. This is called ucitāhāra, or appropriate eating. One who is always eating meat or drinking liquor, which is eating and drinking in passion and ignorance, must give these things up so that his real consciousness may be awakened. In this way one may become peaceful and refreshed. If one is restless or fatigued, one cannot understand the science of God. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.20) :

evaṁ prasanna-manaso bhagavad-bhakti-yogataḥ bhagavat-tattva-vijñānaṁ mukta-saṅgasya jāyate

Unless one can become free from the influence of passion and ignorance, he cannot be pacified, and without being pacified, one cannot understand the science of God. King Purañjana’s returning home is indicative of man’s returning to his original consciousness, known as Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Kṛṣṇa consciousness is absolutely necessary for one who has committed a lot of sinful activities, especially killing animals or hunting in the forest.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then, exhausted from hunger and thirst, he gave up hunting and returned home. He took bath, ate proper food, and, being refreshed, took rest. “Exhausted from hunger and thirst” means that he was troubled on remembering his sinful acts. He then gave up his sinful acts. He then returned home, giving up sinful acts and establishing himself in the rules of dharma. He took his bath: he called brāhmaṇas and had them perform atonements for him. He took suitable food: he gave up meat and liquor. He took rest: he was somewhat steady.
Fatigued, hungry, thirsty, he returned, bathed, dined, rested — freed from restlessness. The materialist's weekend: cycle of intense work followed by ritualized recovery, no spiritual movement.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my own weekly cycle merely fatigue-and-recovery with no spiritual ascent?
  • What addition to the weekend would interrupt the loop?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.12

↗
आत्मानमर्हयां चक्रे धूपालेपस्रगादिभि: । साध्वलङ्कृतसर्वाङ्गो महिष्यामादधे मन: ॥ १२ ॥
ātmānam arhayāṁ cakre
[aatmaanam arhayaam chakre]
dhūpālepa-srag-ādibhiḥ
[dhoopaalepa-srag-aadibhih]
sādhv-alaṅkṛta-sarvāṅgo
[saadhv-alankrita-sarvaango]
mahiṣyām ādadhe manaḥ
[mahishyaam aadadhe manah]
ātmānam — himself arhayām — as it ought to be done cakre — did dhūpa — incense ālepa — smearing the body with sandalwood pulp srak — garlands ādibhiḥ — beginning with sādhu — saintly, beautifully alaṅkṛta — being decorated sarva-aṅgaḥ — all over the body mahiṣyām — unto the Queen ādadhe — he gave manaḥ — mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ātmānam arhayāṁ cakre
ātmānam
himself
arhayām
as it ought to be done
cakre
did
dhūpālepa-srag-ādibhiḥ
dhūpa
incense
ālepa
smearing the body with sandalwood pulp
srak
garlands
ādibhiḥ
beginning with
sādhv-alaṅkṛta-sarvāṅgo
sādhu
saintly, beautifully
alaṅkṛta
being decorated
sarva-aṅgaḥ
all over the body
mahiṣyām ādadhe manaḥ
mahiṣyām
unto the Queen
ādadhe
he gave
manaḥ
mind.
After this, King Purañjana decorated his body with suitable ornaments. He also smeared scented sandalwood pulp over his body and put on flower garlands. In this way he became completely refreshed. After this, he began to search out his Queen.

When a man comes into good consciousness and accepts a saintly person as a spiritual master, he hears many Vedic instructions in the form of philosophy, stories, narrations about great devotees, and transactions between God and His devotees. In this way a man becomes refreshed in mind, exactly like a person who smears scented sandalwood pulp all over his body and decorates himself with ornaments. These decorations may be compared to knowledge of religion and the self. Through such knowledge one becomes detached from a materialistic way of life and engages himself in always hearing Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Bhagavad-gītā and other Vedic literatures. The word sādhv-alaṅkṛta used in this verse indicates that one must be absorbed in knowledge gathered from the instructions of saintly persons. Just as King Purañjana began to search out his better half, the Queen, one who is decorated with knowledge and instructions from saintly persons should try to search out his original consciousness, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. One cannot return to Kṛṣṇa consciousness unless he is favored by the instructions of a saintly person. Therefore Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura sings, sādhu-śāstra-guru-vākya, cittete kariyā aikya. If we want to become saintly persons, or if we want to return to our original Kṛṣṇa consciousness, we must associate with sādhu (a saintly person), śāstra (authoritative Vedic literature) and guru (a bona fide spiritual master). This is the process.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He worshipped himself with incense, ointments, and garland. With well groomed body, he then remembered his Queen. Honoring devotees, sages and wise men, he purified himself internally, by hearing various instructions on dharma and knowledge. When internally he was completely attached to the rules of scripture, returning to his previous condition, he remembered his intelligence fixed in dharma.
He decorated himself with ornaments, sandalwood, garlands, then searched for the queen. Cleaned up, body-fresh — but the search now is for sense-resumption, not for clarity.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse refreshing the body with refreshing the soul?
  • What 'search' am I about to start that's just a renewed version of the same loop?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.13

↗
तृप्तो हृष्ट: सुद‍ृप्तश्च कन्दर्पाकृष्टमानस: । न व्यचष्ट वरारोहां गृहिणीं गृहमेधिनीम् ॥ १३ ॥
tṛpto hṛṣṭaḥ sudṛptaś ca
[tripto hrishtah sudriptash cha]
kandarpākṛṣṭa-mānasaḥ
[kandarpaakrishta-maanasah]
na vyacaṣṭa varārohāṁ
[na vyachashta varaarohaam]
gṛhiṇīṁ gṛha-medhinīm
[grihineem griha-medhineem]
tṛptaḥ — satisfied hṛṣṭaḥ — joyful su-dṛptaḥ — being very proud ca — also kandarpa — by Cupid ākṛṣṭa — attracted mānasaḥ — his mind na — did not vyacaṣṭa — try vara-ārohām — higher consciousness gṛhiṇīm — wife gṛha-medhinīm — one who keeps her husband in material life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tṛpto hṛṣṭaḥ sudṛptaś ca
tṛptaḥ
satisfied
hṛṣṭaḥ
joyful
su-dṛptaḥ
being very proud
ca
also
kandarpākṛṣṭa-mānasaḥ
kandarpa
by Cupid
ākṛṣṭa
attracted
mānasaḥ
his mind
na vyacaṣṭa varārohāṁ
na
did not
vyacaṣṭa
try
vara-ārohām
higher consciousness
gṛhiṇīṁ gṛha-medhinīm
gṛhiṇīm
wife
gṛha-medhinīm
one who keeps her husband in material life.
After taking his dinner and having his thirst and hunger satisfied, King Purañjana felt some joy within his heart. Instead of being elevated to a higher consciousness, he became captivated by Cupid, and was moved by a desire to find his wife, who kept him satisfied in his household life.

This verse is very significant for those desiring to elevate themselves to a higher level of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. When a person is initiated by a spiritual master, he changes his habits and does not eat undesirable eatables or engage in the eating of meat, the drinking of liquor, illicit sex or gambling. Sāttvika-āhāra, foodstuffs in the mode of goodness, are described in the śāstras as wheat, rice, vegetables, fruits, milk, sugar, and milk products. Simple food like rice, dāl, capātīs, vegetables, milk and sugar constitute a balanced diet, but sometimes it is found that an initiated person, in the name of prasāda, eats very luxurious foodstuffs. Due to his past sinful life he becomes attracted by Cupid and eats good food voraciously. It is clearly visible that when a neophyte in Kṛṣṇa consciousness eats too much, he falls down. Instead of being elevated to pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he becomes attracted by Cupid. The so-called brahmacārī becomes agitated by women, and the vānaprastha may again become captivated into having sex with his wife, or he may begin to search out another wife. Due to some sentiment, he may give up his own wife and come into the association of devotees and a spiritual master, but due to his past sinful life he cannot stay. Instead of being elevated to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he falls down, being attracted by Cupid, and takes to another wife for sex enjoyment. The fall of the neophyte devotee from the path of Kṛṣṇa consciousness down to material life is described in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.5.17) by Nārada Muni:

tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer bhajann apakvo ’tha patet tato yadi yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ ko vārtha āpto ’bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ

This indicates that although a neophyte devotee may fall down from the path of Kṛṣṇa consciousness due to his immaturity, his service to Kṛṣṇa never goes in vain. However, a person who remains steadfast in his family duty or so-called social or family obligation but does not take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness receives no profit. One who comes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness must be very cautious and refrain from prohibited activities, as defined by Rūpa Gosvāmī in his Upadeśāmṛta:

atyāhāraḥ prayāsaś ca prajalpo niyamāgrahaḥ jana-saṅgaś ca laulyaṁ ca ṣaḍbhir bhaktir vinaśyati

A neophyte devotee should neither eat too much nor collect more money than necessary. Eating too much or collecting too much is called atyāhāra. For such atyāhāra one must endeavor very much. This is called prayāsa. Superficially one may show himself to be very much faithful to the rules and regulations, but at the same time not be fixed in the regulative principles. This is called niyamāgraha. By mixing with undesirable persons, or jana-saṅga, one becomes tainted with lust and greed and falls down from the path of devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Satisfied, joyful, and very proud, his mind enamored by Cupid, he did not see his beautiful wife. This verse indicates that his impressions of sinful life had left him. “Enamored by Cupid” means that he became eager to find his young intelligence fixed in dharma in his previous state. But he did not see her. According to the story, however, having gone to the forest on the pretext of hunting, he enjoyed with some women. He then thought of her as his wife. Spiritually speaking, because of the disappearance of the last traces of contamination due to committing some sin, though one desires one’s previous intelligence in order to act according to dharma, it does not appear immediately.
After dinner, instead of rising to higher consciousness, he was captivated by Cupid and moved to find his wife. The post-rest moment can launch a soul up or send it back down; choose deliberately.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'after dinner' moment in my day routinely launches me back into Cupid-driven search?
  • Where could a deliberate higher direction be installed in that exact moment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.14

↗
अन्त:पुरस्त्रियोऽपृच्छद्विमना इव वेदिषत् । अपि व: कुशलं रामा: सेश्वरीणां यथा पुरा ॥ १४ ॥
antaḥpura-striyo ’pṛcchad
[antahpura-striyo ’prichchad]
vimanā iva vediṣat
[vimanaa iva vedishat]
api vaḥ kuśalaṁ rāmāḥ
[api vah kushalam raamaah]
seśvarīṇāṁ yathā purā
[seshvareenaam yathaa puraa]
antaḥ-pura — household striyaḥ — women apṛcchat — he asked vimanāḥ — being very much anxious iva — like vediṣat — O King Prācīnabarhi api — whether vaḥ — your kuśalam — good fortune rāmāḥ — O you beautiful women sa-īśvarīṇām — with your mistress yathā — as purā — before.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
antaḥpura-striyo ’pṛcchad
antaḥ-pura
household
striyaḥ
women
vimanā iva vediṣat
api vaḥ kuśalaṁ rāmāḥ
apṛcchat
he asked
vimanāḥ
being very much anxious
iva
like
vediṣat
O King Prācīnabarhi
seśvarīṇāṁ yathā purā
api
whether
vaḥ
your
kuśalam
good fortune
rāmāḥ
O you beautiful women
sa-īśvarīṇām
with your mistress
yathā
as
purā
before.
At that time King Purañjana was a little anxious, and he inquired from the household women: My dear beautiful women, are you and your mistress all very happy like before, or not?

In this verse the word vediṣat indicates King Prācīnabarhi. When a man becomes refreshed by association with devotees and awakes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he consults the activities of his mind — namely thinking, feeling and willing — and decides whether he should return to his material activities or stay steady in spiritual consciousness. The word kuśalam refers to that which is auspicious. One can make his home perfectly auspicious when he engages in devotional service to Lord Viṣṇu. When one is engaged in activities other than viṣṇu-bhakti, or in other words when one is engaged in material activities, he is always filled with anxieties. A sane man should consult his mind — its thinking, feeling and willing processes — and decide how these processes should be utilized. If one always thinks of Kṛṣṇa, feels how to serve Him and wills to execute the order of Kṛṣṇa, it should be known that he has taken good instruction from his intelligence, which is called the mother. Although the King was refreshed, he nonetheless inquired about his wife. Thus he was consulting, thinking and willing how he could return to his steady good consciousness. The mind may suggest that by viṣaya-bhoga, or sense enjoyment, one can become happy, but when one becomes advanced in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he does not derive happiness from material activities. This is explained in Bhagavad-gītā (2.59) :

viṣayā vinivartante nirāhārasya dehinaḥ rasa-varjaṁ raso ’py asya paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate

“The embodied soul may be restricted from sense enjoyment, though the taste for sense objects remains. But, ceasing such engagements by experiencing a higher taste, he is fixed in consciousness.” One cannot be unattached to the sense objects unless he finds better engagement in devotional service. Paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate: one can cease from material activities only when one actually engages in devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Prācīnabarhi! Somewhat dejected, he asked the women of the household, “O women! Are you who attend my Queen in good health as previously?” O King Prācīnabarhi (vediṣat)! Are you who accompany the Queen well?
He asked the household women: are you all happy as before? Inquiry after the queen is partial wisdom; consulting devotees-of-the-house can re-orient.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'household women' have I been ignoring whose answers would orient me?
  • Where could even a single honest question to my dependents wake me up?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.15

↗
न तथैतर्हि रोचन्ते गृहेषु गृहसम्पद: । यदि न स्याद्गृहे माता पत्नी वा पतिदेवता । व्यङ्गे रथ इव प्राज्ञ: को नामासीत दीनवत् ॥ १५ ॥
na tathaitarhi rocante
[na tathaitarhi rochante]
gṛheṣu gṛha-sampadaḥ
[griheshu griha-sampadah]
yadi na syād gṛhe mātā
[yadi na syaad grihe maataa]
patnī vā pati-devatā
[patnee vaa pati-devataa]
vyaṅge ratha iva prājñaḥ
[vyange ratha iva praajnah]
ko nāmāsīta dīnavat
[ko naamaaseeta deenavat]
na — not tathā — like before etarhi — at this moment rocante — become pleasing gṛheṣu — at home gṛha-sampadaḥ — all household paraphernalia yadi — if na — not syāt — there is gṛhe — at home mātā — mother patnī — wife vā — or pati-devatā — devoted to the husband vyaṅge — without wheels rathe — in a chariot iva — like prājñaḥ — learned man kaḥ — who is that nāma — indeed āsīta — would sit dīna-vat — like a poverty-stricken creature.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na tathaitarhi rocante
na
not
tathā
like before
etarhi
at this moment
rocante
become pleasing
gṛheṣu gṛha-sampadaḥ
gṛheṣu
at home
gṛha-sampadaḥ
all household paraphernalia
yadi na syād gṛhe mātā
yadi
if
na
not
syāt
there is
gṛhe
at home
mātā
mother
patnī vā pati-devatā
patnī
wife
vā
or
pati-devatā
devoted to the husband
vyaṅge ratha iva prājñaḥ
vyaṅge
without wheels
rathe
in a chariot
iva
like
prājñaḥ
learned man
kaḥ
who is that
ko nāmāsīta dīnavat
nāma
indeed
āsīta
would sit
dīna-vat
like a poverty-stricken creature.
King Purañjana said: I do not understand why my household paraphernalia does not attract me as before. I think that if there is neither a mother nor devoted wife at home, the home is like a chariot without wheels. Where is the fool who will sit down on such an unworkable chariot?

The great politician Cāṇakya Paṇḍita said:

mātā yasya gṛhe nāsti bhāryā cāpriya-vādinī araṇyaṁ tena gantavyaṁ yathāraṇyaṁ tathā gṛham

“If a person has neither a mother nor a pleasing wife at home, he should leave home and go to the forest, because for him there is no difference between the forest and home.” The real mātā, or mother, is devotional service to the Lord, and the real patnī, or devoted wife, is a wife who helps her husband execute religious principles in devotional service. These two things are required for a happy home.

Actually, a woman is supposed to be the energy of the man. Historically, in the background of every great man there is either a mother or a wife. One’s household life is very successful if he has both a good wife and mother. In such a case, everything about household affairs and all the paraphernalia in the house becomes very pleasing. Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu had both a good mother and pleasing wife, and He was very happy at home. Nonetheless, for the benefit of the whole human race, He took sannyāsa and left both His mother and wife. In other words, it is essential that one have both a good mother and wife in order to become perfectly happy at home. Otherwise home life has no meaning. Unless one is religiously guided by intelligence and renders devotional service unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead, his home can never become very pleasing to a saintly person. In other words, if a man has a good mother or a good wife, there is no need of his taking sannyāsa — that is, unless it is absolutely necessary, as it was for Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Now the wealth of the house is not attractive. If there is no mother or wife in the house, what learned man would remain there? It is like a chariot without wheels. Now (etarhi), without her, the house is not pleasing. The women of the house are the actions of the antaḥkaraṇa in their previous condition, inclined to dharma. They suddenly appeared. Seeing them, he considered “If the actions of my intelligence remain steady, destroying my present impressions of sin, they can deliver me.” Thus he asks how they are. “But you should become happy by enjoying material objects. What is the use of dharma?” The first line of the verse answers: now, the forbidden objects do not give pleasure. The mother is bhakti to Viṣṇu. The wife is intelligence endowed with dharma. Vyaṅge means without wheels.
Without mother or devoted wife, home is a chariot without wheels — useless. The household's essential figures provide motion; without them, the vehicle won't roll.
Reflection Questions
  • Which essential figure has gone quiet in my household, leaving me motionless?
  • Where am I sitting on a wheelless chariot and calling it 'home'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.16

↗
क्‍व वर्तते सा ललना मज्जन्तं व्यसनार्णवे । या मामुद्धरते प्रज्ञां दीपयन्ती पदे पदे ॥ १६ ॥
kva vartate sā lalanā
[kva vartate saa lalanaa]
majjantaṁ vyasanārṇave
[majjantam vyasanaarnave]
yā mām uddharate prajñāṁ
[yaa maam uddharate prajnaam]
dīpayantī pade pade
[deepayantee pade pade]
kva — where vartate — is now staying sā — she lalanā — woman majjantam — while drowning vyasana-arṇave — in the ocean of danger yā — who mām — me uddharate — delivers prajñām — good intelligence dīpayantī — enlightening pade pade — in every step.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kva vartate sā lalanā
kva
where
vartate
is now staying
sā
she
lalanā
woman
majjantaṁ vyasanārṇave
majjantam
while drowning
vyasana-arṇave
in the ocean of danger
yā mām uddharate prajñāṁ
yā
who
mām
me
uddharate
delivers
prajñām
good intelligence
dīpayantī pade pade
dīpayantī
enlightening
pade pade
in every step.
Kindly let me know the whereabouts of that beautiful woman who always saves me when I am drowning in the ocean of danger. By giving me good intelligence at every step, she always saves me.

There is no difference between a good wife and good intelligence. One who possesses good intelligence can deliberate properly and save himself from many dangerous conditions. In material existence there is danger at every step. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (10.14.58) it is said, padaṁ padaṁ yad vipadāṁ na teṣām: this material world is not actually a place of residence for an intelligent person or a devotee because here there is danger at every step. Vaikuṇṭha is the real home for the devotee, for there is no anxiety and no danger. Good intelligence means becoming Kṛṣṇa conscious. In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta it is said, kṛṣṇa ye bhaje se baḍa catura: unless one is Kṛṣṇa conscious, he cannot be called an intelligent person.

Herein we see that King Purañjana was searching after his good wife, who always helped him out of the dangerous situations that always occur in material existence. As already explained, a real wife is dharma-patnī. That is, a woman accepted in marriage by ritualistic ceremony is called dharma-patnī, which signifies that she is accepted in terms of religious principles. Children born of a dharma-patnī inherit the property of the father, but children born of a woman who is not properly married do not inherit the father’s property. The word dharma-patnī also refers to a chaste wife. A chaste wife is one who never had any connection with men before her marriage. Once a woman is given the freedom to mingle with all kinds of men in her youth, it is very difficult for her to keep chaste. When butter is brought into the proximity of fire, it melts. The woman is like fire, and man is like the butter. But if one gets a chaste wife, accepted through a religious marriage ritual, she can be of great help when one is threatened by the many dangerous situations of life. Actually such a wife can become the source of all good intelligence. With such a good wife, the family’s engagement in the devotional service of the Lord actually makes a home a gṛhastha-āśrama, or household dedicated to spiritual cultivation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Where is this woman who enlightens my intelligence, who delivers me at every step, when I am drowning in the ocean of saṁsāra? Where is she? The actions of the intelligence (the Queen’s assistants) are not so helpful. He laments that they are not the intelligence itself.
Tell me where she is — she saves me by giving good intelligence at every step. He correctly identifies the queen as his rescuer; this recognition is the start of return.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose ongoing intelligence-saving in my life have I forgotten to credit?
  • Where do I keep encountering rescue without thanking the rescuer?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.17

↗
रामा ऊचु: नरनाथ न जानीमस्त्वत्प्रिया यद्वय‍वस्यति । भूतले निरवस्तारे शयानां पश्य शत्रुहन् ॥ १७ ॥
rāmā ūcuḥ
[raamaa oochuh]
nara-nātha na jānīmas
[nara-naatha na jaaneemas]
tvat-priyā yad vyavasyati
[tvat-priyaa yad vyavasyati]
bhūtale niravastāre
[bhootale niravastaare]
śayānāṁ paśya śatru-han
[shayaanaam pashya shatru-han]
rāmāḥ ūcuḥ — the women thus spoke nara-nātha — O King na jānīmaḥ — we do not know tvat-priyā — your beloved yat vyavasyati — why she has taken to this sort of life bhū-tale — on the ground niravastāre — without bedding śayānām — lying down paśya — look śatru-han — O killer of enemies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rāmā ūcuḥ
rāmāḥ ūcuḥ
the women thus spoke
nara-nātha na jānīmas
nara-nātha
O King
na jānīmaḥ
we do not know
tvat-priyā yad vyavasyati
tvat-priyā
your beloved
yat vyavasyati
why she has taken to this sort of life
bhūtale niravastāre
bhū-tale
on the ground
niravastāre
without bedding
śayānāṁ paśya śatru-han
śayānām
lying down
paśya
look
śatru-han
O killer of enemies.
All the women addressed the King: O master of the citizens, we do not know why your dear wife has taken on this sort of existence. O killer of enemies, kindly look! She is lying on the ground without bedding. We cannot understand why she is acting this way.

When a person is devoid of devotional service, or viṣṇu-bhakti, he takes to many sinful activities. King Purañjana left home, neglected his own wife and engaged himself in killing animals. This is the position of all materialistic men. They do not care for a married chaste wife. They take the wife only as an instrument for sense enjoyment, not as a means for devotional service. To have unrestricted sex life, the karmīs work very hard. They have concluded that the best course is to have sex with any woman and simply pay the price for her, as though she were a mercantile commodity. Thus they engage their energy in working very hard for such material acquisitions. Such materialistic people have lost their good intelligence. They must search out their intelligence within the heart. A person who does not have a chaste wife accepted by religious principles always has a bewildered intelligence.

The wife of King Purañjana was lying on the ground because she was neglected by her husband. Actually the woman must always be protected by her husband. We always speak of the goddess of fortune as being placed on the chest of Nārāyaṇa. In other words, the wife must remain embraced by her husband. Thus she becomes beloved and well protected. Just as one saves his money and places it under his own personal protection, one should similarly protect his wife by his own personal supervision. Just as intelligence is always within the heart, so a beloved chaste wife should always have her place on the chest of a good husband. This is the proper relationship between husband and wife. A wife is therefore called ardhāṅganī, or half of the body. One cannot remain with only one leg, one hand or only one side of the body. He must have two sides. Similarly, according to nature’s way, husband and wife should live together. In the lower species of life, among birds and animals, it is seen that by nature’s arrangement the husband and wife live together. It is similarly ideal in human life for the husband and wife to live together. The home should be a place for devotional service, and the wife should be chaste and accepted by a ritualistic ceremony. In this way one can become happy at home.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The women said: O King! Killer of enemies! We do not know what your beloved has decided to do. See her lying on the ground without bedding! Niravastāre means “without bedding.” His heart is her flower bed. She has given that up. The intelligence endowed with dharma is lying on the ground.
The women report: she's lying on the ground without bedding — we don't know why. Neglected intelligence behaves like a mendicant; the soul's absence reduces her to ground-level.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose dignity in my life has dropped to ground-level because of my absence?
  • Where am I responsible for someone's mendicant condition I haven't faced?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.18

↗
नारद उवाच पुरञ्जन: स्वमहिषीं निरीक्ष्यावधुतां भुवि । तत्सङ्गोन्मथितज्ञानो वैक्लव्यं परमं ययौ ॥ १८ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
purañjanaḥ sva-mahiṣīṁ
[puranjanah sva-mahisheem]
nirīkṣyāvadhutāṁ bhuvi
[nireekshyaavadhutaam bhuvi]
tat-saṅgonmathita-jñāno
[tat-sangonmathita-jnaano]
vaiklavyaṁ paramaṁ yayau
[vaiklavyam paramam yayau]
nāradaḥ uvāca — the great sage Nārada spoke purañjanaḥ — King Purañjana sva-mahiṣīm — his own Queen nirīkṣya — after seeing avadhutām — appearing like a mendicant bhuvi — on the ground tat — her saṅga — by association unmathita — encouraged jñānaḥ — whose knowledge vaiklavyam — bewilderment paramam — supreme yayau — obtained.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ uvāca
the great sage Nārada spoke
purañjanaḥ sva-mahiṣīṁ
purañjanaḥ
King Purañjana
sva-mahiṣīm
his own Queen
nirīkṣyāvadhutāṁ bhuvi
nirīkṣya
after seeing
avadhutām
appearing like a mendicant
bhuvi
on the ground
tat-saṅgonmathita-jñāno
tat
her
saṅga
by association
unmathita
encouraged
jñānaḥ
whose knowledge
vaiklavyaṁ paramaṁ yayau
vaiklavyam
bewilderment
paramam
supreme
yayau
obtained.
The great sage Nārada continued: My dear King Prācīnabarhi, as soon as King Purañjana saw his Queen lying on the ground, appearing like a mendicant, he immediately became bewildered.

In this verse the word avadhutām is especially significant, for it refers to a mendicant who does not take care of his body. Since the Queen was lying on the ground without bedding and proper dress, King Purañjana became very much aggrieved. In other words, he repented that he had neglected his intelligence and had engaged himself in the forest in killing animals. In other words, when one’s good intelligence is separated or neglected, he fully engages in sinful activities. Due to neglecting one’s good intelligence, or Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one becomes bewildered and engages in sinful activities. Upon realizing this, a man becomes repentant. Such repentance is described by Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura:

hari hari viphale janama goṅāinu manuṣya-janama pāiyā, rādhā-kṛṣṇa nā bhajiyā, jāniyā śuniyā viṣa khāinu

Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura herein says that he repents for having spoiled his human life and knowingly drunk poison. By not being Kṛṣṇa conscious, one willingly drinks the poison of material life. The purport is that one certainly becomes addicted to sinful activities when he becomes devoid of his good chaste wife, or when he has lost his good sense and does not take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Seeing the Queen lying on the ground without regard for her body, Purañjana, anxious to be with her again, became miserable. Avadhūtām means “giving up respect for the body.” Seeing that she was injured because of leaving his heart on her own, he thought, “I have committed a great offense.” Being anxious to associate again with her, he deprecated his foolishness. Vaiklayvam means miserable.
Seeing her on the ground like a mendicant, he became bewildered. The visible degradation of what he neglected finally registers; bewilderment is the first form of remorse.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose visible degradation am I steeling myself against rather than letting myself be bewildered?
  • Where does bewilderment need to be allowed before remorse can begin?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.19

↗
सान्‍त्वयन् श्लक्ष्णया वाचा हृदयेन विदूयता । प्रेयस्या: स्‍नेहसंरम्भलिङ्गमात्मनि नाभ्यगात् ॥ १९ ॥
sāntvayan ślakṣṇayā vācā
[saantvayan shlakshnayaa vaachaa]
hṛdayena vidūyatā
[hridayena vidooyataa]
preyasyāḥ sneha-saṁrambha-
[preyasyaah sneha-samrambha-]
liṅgam ātmani nābhyagāt
[lingam aatmani naabhyagaat]
sāntvayan — pacifying ślakṣṇayā — by sweet vācā — words hṛdayena — with a heart vidūyatā — regretting very much preyasyāḥ — of his beloved sneha — from affection saṁrambha — of anger liṅgam — symptom ātmani — in her heart na — did not abhyagāt — arouse.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāntvayan ślakṣṇayā vācā
sāntvayan
pacifying
ślakṣṇayā
by sweet
vācā
words
hṛdayena vidūyatā
hṛdayena
with a heart
vidūyatā
regretting very much
preyasyāḥ sneha-saṁrambha-
preyasyāḥ
of his beloved
sneha
from affection
saṁrambha
of anger
liṅgam ātmani nābhyagāt
liṅgam
symptom
ātmani
in her heart
na
did not
abhyagāt
arouse.
The King, with aggrieved mind, began to speak to his wife with very pleasing words. Although he was filled with regret and tried to pacify her, he could not see any symptom of anger caused by love within the heart of his beloved wife.

The King very much regretted having left his Queen and having gone to the forest to execute sinful activities. When a person regrets his sinful activities, the abandoning of Kṛṣṇa consciousness and good intelligence, his path of deliverance from the path of material clutches is opened. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (5.5.5) , parābhavas tāvad abodha-jāto yāvan na jijñāsata ātma-tattvam. When a person loses his Kṛṣṇa consciousness and loses interest in self-realization, he must engage in sinful activities. All one’s activities in a life devoid of Kṛṣṇa consciousness simply lead to defeat and misuse of one’s life. Naturally one who comes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness regrets his previous sinful activities in the human form. Only by this process can one be delivered from the clutches of nescience or ignorance in materialistic life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Pacifying her with sweet words filled with regret, he did not find in her any symptoms of anger caused by her affection. By good fortune my previous intelligence has again appeared, without whom I will become unfortunate. He repeated this in his mind. He could not see in her anger caused by affection. For a moment he thought “Why did I commit those sinful activities?”
With pleasing words he tried to pacify her; she showed no symptom of love-anger in her heart. Some wounds don't even register the apology; they've gone past anger to indifference.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose grievance I'm trying to soothe has moved beyond anger to indifference?
  • Where is past-anger a sign of still-caring, and where is no-anger a sign of having let go?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.20

↗
अनुनिन्येऽथ शनकैर्वीरोऽनुनयकोविद: । पस्पर्श पादयुगलमाह चोत्सङ्गलालिताम् ॥ २० ॥
anuninye ’tha śanakair
[anuninye ’tha shanakair]
vīro ’nunaya-kovidaḥ
[veero ’nunaya-kovidah]
pasparśa pāda-yugalam
[pasparsha paada-yugalam]
āha cotsaṅga-lālitām
[aaha chotsanga-laalitaam]
anuninye — began to flatter atha — thus śanakaiḥ — gradually vīraḥ — the hero anunaya-kovidaḥ — one who is very expert in flattery pasparśa — touched pāda-yugalam — both the feet āha — he said ca — also utsaṅga — on his lap lālitām — thus being embraced.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anuninye ’tha śanakair
anuninye
began to flatter
atha
thus
śanakaiḥ
gradually
vīro ’nunaya-kovidaḥ
vīraḥ
the hero
pasparśa pāda-yugalam
āha cotsaṅga-lālitām
anunaya-kovidaḥ
one who is very expert in flattery
pasparśa
touched
pāda-yugalam
both the feet
āha
he said
ca
also
utsaṅga
on his lap
lālitām
thus being embraced.
Because the King was very expert in flattery, he began to pacify his Queen very slowly. First he touched her two feet, then embraced her nicely, seating her on his lap, and began to speak as follows.

One has to awaken his Kṛṣṇa consciousness by first regretting his past deeds. Just as King Purañjana began to flatter his Queen, one should, by deliberate consideration, raise himself to the platform of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. To attain such an end, one must touch the lotus feet of the spiritual master. Kṛṣṇa consciousness cannot be achieved by self-endeavor. One must therefore approach a self-realized, Kṛṣṇa conscious person and touch his lotus feet. Prahlāda Mahārāja therefore said:

naiṣāṁ matis tāvad urukramāṅghriṁ spṛśaty anarthāpagamo yad-arthaḥ mahīyasāṁ pāda-rajo-’bhiṣekaṁ niṣkiñcanānāṁ na vṛṇīta yāvat

( Bhāg. 7.5.32 )

One cannot come to the precincts of Kṛṣṇa consciousness unless he touches the dust of the lotus feet of a person who has become a mahātmā, a great devotee. This is the beginning of the surrendering process. Lord Kṛṣṇa wants everyone to surrender unto Him, and this surrendering process begins when one touches the lotus feet of a bona fide spiritual master. By sincerely rendering service to a bona fide spiritual master, one begins his spiritual life in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Touching the lotus feet of a spiritual master means giving up one’s false prestige and unnecessarily puffed-up position in the material world. Those who remain in the darkness of material existence due to their falsely prestigious positions — so-called scientists and philosophers — are actually atheists. They do not know the ultimate cause of everything. Although bewildered, they are not ready to surrender themselves to the lotus feet of a person who knows things in their proper perspective. In other words, one cannot arouse Kṛṣṇa consciousness simply by his own mental speculation. One must surrender to a bona fide spiritual master. Only this process will help one.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Gradually the hero, expert at conciliation, appeased her. He touched her two feet and, putting her on his lap, spoke. He appeased her saying, “From today I will no longer use my intelligence for enjoying sinfully.” Her two feet represent giving up ahaṅkāra and respecting the devotees. “He put her on his lap” means he put her back in his heart.
Related verses
Expert in flattery, he touched her feet, embraced her, sat her on his lap, and spoke. Reconciliation begins with bodily gestures of humility, not with explanations.
Reflection Questions
  • Which bodily gesture of humility am I refusing to make because words feel cheaper?
  • Whose feet should I touch before I attempt to explain anything?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.21

↗
पुरञ्जन उवाच नूनं त्वकृतपुण्यास्ते भृत्या येष्वीश्वरा: शुभे । कृताग:स्वात्मसात्कृत्वा शिक्षादण्डं न युञ्जते ॥ २१ ॥
purañjana uvāca
[puranjana uvaacha]
nūnaṁ tv akṛta-puṇyās te
[noonam tv akrita-punyaas te]
bhṛtyā yeṣv īśvarāḥ śubhe
[bhrityaa yeshv eeshvaraah shubhe]
kṛtāgaḥsv ātmasāt kṛtvā
[kritaagahsv aatmasaat kritvaa]
śikṣā-daṇḍaṁ na yuñjate
[shikshaa-dandam na yunjate]
purañjanaḥ uvāca — Purañjana said nūnam — certainly tu — then akṛta-puṇyāḥ — those who are not pious te — such bhṛtyāḥ — servants yeṣu — unto whom īśvarāḥ — the masters śubhe — O most auspicious one kṛta-āgaḥsu — having committed an offense ātmasāt — accepting as their own kṛtvā — doing so śikṣā — instructive daṇḍam — punishment na yuñjate — do not give.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
purañjana uvāca
purañjanaḥ uvāca
Purañjana said
nūnaṁ tv akṛta-puṇyās te
nūnam
certainly
tu
then
akṛta-puṇyāḥ
those who are not pious
te
such
bhṛtyā yeṣv īśvarāḥ śubhe
bhṛtyāḥ
servants
yeṣu
unto whom
īśvarāḥ
the masters
śubhe
O most auspicious one
kṛtāgaḥsv ātmasāt kṛtvā
kṛta-āgaḥsu
having committed an offense
ātmasāt
accepting as their own
kṛtvā
doing so
śikṣā-daṇḍaṁ na yuñjate
śikṣā
instructive
daṇḍam
punishment
na yuñjate
do not give.
King Purañjana said: My dear beautiful wife, when a master accepts a servant as his own man, but does not punish him for his offenses, the servant must be considered unfortunate.

According to Vedic civilization, domestic animals and servants are treated exactly like one’s own children. Animals and children are sometimes punished not out of vengeance but out of love. Similarly, a master sometimes punishes his servant, not out of vengeance but out of love, to correct him and bring him to the right point. Thus King Purañjana took his punishment dealt by his wife, the Queen, as mercy upon him. He considered himself the most obedient servant of the Queen. She was angry at him for his sinful activities, namely hunting in the forest and leaving her at home. King Purañjana accepted the punishment as actual love and affection from his wife. In the same way, when a person is punished by the laws of nature, by the will of God, he should not be disturbed. A real devotee thinks in this way. When a devotee is put into an awkward position, he takes it as the mercy of the Supreme Lord:

tat te ’nukampāṁ susamīkṣamāṇo bhuñjāna evātma-kṛtaṁ vipākam hṛd-vāg-vapurbhir vidadhan namas te jīveta yo mukti-pade sa dāya-bhāk

( Bhāg. 10.14.8 )

This verse states that the devotee accepts a reversal of his position in life as a benediction by the Lord and consequently offers the Lord more obeisances and prayers, thinking that the punishment is due to his past misdeeds and that the Lord is punishing him very mildly. The punishment awarded by the state or by God for one’s own faults is actually for one’s benefit. In the Manu-saṁhitā it is said that the King should be considered merciful when he condemns a murderer to death because a murderer punished in this life becomes freed from his sinful activity and in the next life takes birth cleared of all sins. If one accepts punishment as a reward dealt by the master, he becomes intelligent enough not to commit the same mistake again.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Purañjana said: Auspicious woman! If a master does not punish his servant to instruct him when the servant commits sin, because he considers the servant as a dependent, the servant should be considered unfortunate. Dear wife! You have punished me by your anger. That is your mercy to teach this foolish servant who has committed offense. I will never give up in this life. He says this in two verses by introducing general principles. Considering the servant to be dependent on him (ātmasāt kṛtvā), the master does not punish the servant in order to teach him. That servant is unfortunate. Those who get punished are fortunate. I have been punished, and consider myself fortunate. On the spiritual level, the devotee thinks “Though I am reformed now, it is difficult to bear the public criticism and dissatisfaction in my heart caused by those temporary sinful acts. The Supreme Lord himself has punished me to teach me. I will not give up proper intelligence again in this life.” He addresses the intelligence by his mind in two verses.
Related verses
A master who doesn't punish his offending servant makes the servant unfortunate. Punishment of those you love is part of caring for them; absence of it produces drift.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose drift have I enabled by withholding loving correction?
  • Where do I confuse forgiveness with refusal-to-correct?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.22

↗
परमोऽनुग्रहो दण्डो भृत्येषु प्रभुणार्पित: । बालो न वेद तत्तन्वि बन्धुकृत्यममर्षण: ॥ २२ ॥
paramo ’nugraho daṇḍo
[paramo ’nugraho dando]
bhṛtyeṣu prabhuṇārpitaḥ
[bhrityeshu prabhunaarpitah]
bālo na veda tat tanvi
[baalo na veda tat tanvi]
bandhu-kṛtyam amarṣaṇaḥ
[bandhu-krityam amarshanah]
paramaḥ — supreme anugrahaḥ — mercy daṇḍaḥ — punishment bhṛtyeṣu — upon the servants prabhuṇā — by the master arpitaḥ — awarded bālaḥ — foolish na — does not veda — know tat — that tanvi — O slender maiden bandhu-kṛtyam — the duty of a friend amarṣaṇaḥ — angry.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paramo ’nugraho daṇḍo
paramaḥ
supreme
anugrahaḥ
mercy
bhṛtyeṣu prabhuṇārpitaḥ
bālo na veda tat tanvi
daṇḍaḥ
punishment
bhṛtyeṣu
upon the servants
prabhuṇā
by the master
bandhu-kṛtyam amarṣaṇaḥ
arpitaḥ
awarded
bālaḥ
foolish
na
does not
veda
know
tat
that
tanvi
O slender maiden
bandhu-kṛtyam
the duty of a friend
amarṣaṇaḥ
angry.
My dear slender maiden, when a master chastises his servant, the servant should accept this as great mercy. One who becomes angry must be very foolish not to know that such is the duty of his friend.

It is said that when a foolish man is instructed in something very nice, he generally cannot accept it. Indeed, he actually becomes angry. Such anger is compared to the poison of a serpent, for when a serpent is fed milk and bananas, its poison actually increases. Instead of becoming merciful or sober, the serpent increases its poisonous venom when fed nice foodstuffs. Similarly, when a fool is instructed, he does not rectify himself but actually becomes angry.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O slender woman! The punishment awarded to the servant by the master is the greatest mercy. Only a foolish person will become angry at his punishment, because he does not know it is done out of friendship. The victim of punishment who laments is a fool. Amarṣaṇaḥ means one who becomes angry. The devotee speaks internally to good intelligence. I have given up good intelligence and now repent. That is my punishment given by you. It is the highest mercy to me, for I will not become attached to sin again.
When a master chastises a servant, the servant should accept it as mercy; the angry servant is foolish. Inverted: when wisdom 'chastises' the soul, the soul should receive it as mercy, not insult.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I responding to wisdom's chastisement with anger rather than gratitude?
  • Whose chastisement have I rejected that was actually the deepest love?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.23

↗
सा त्वं मुखं सुदति सुभ्र्‌वनुरागभार व्रीडाविलम्बविलसद्धसितावलोकम् । नीलालकालिभिरुपस्कृतमुन्नसं न: स्वानां प्रदर्शय मनस्विनि वल्गुवाक्यम् ॥ २३ ॥
sā tvaṁ mukhaṁ sudati subhrv anurāga-bhāra-
[saa tvam mukham sudati subhrv anuraaga-bhaara-]
vrīḍā-vilamba-vilasad-dhasitāvalokam
[vreedaa-vilamba-vilasad-dhasitaavalokam]
nīlālakālibhir upaskṛtam unnasaṁ naḥ
[neelaalakaalibhir upaskritam unnasam nah]
svānāṁ pradarśaya manasvini valgu-vākyam
[svaanaam pradarshaya manasvini valgu-vaakyam]
sā — that (you, my wife) tvam — you mukham — your face su-dati — with beautiful teeth su-bhru — with beautiful eyebrows anurāga — attachment bhāra — loaded by vrīḍā — feminine shyness vilamba — hanging down vilasat — shining hasita — smiling avalokam — with glances nīla — bluish alaka — with hair alibhiḥ — beelike upaskṛtam — thus being beautiful unnasam — with a raised nose naḥ — to me svānām — who am yours pradarśaya — please show manasvini — O most thoughtful lady valgu-vākyam — with sweet words.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sā tvaṁ mukhaṁ sudati subhrv anurāga-bhāra-
sā
that (you, my wife)
tvam
you
mukham
your face
su-dati
with beautiful teeth
su-bhru
with beautiful eyebrows
anurāga
attachment
bhāra
loaded by
vrīḍā-vilamba-vilasad-dhasitāvalokam
vrīḍā
feminine shyness
vilamba
hanging down
vilasat
shining
hasita
smiling
avalokam
with glances
nīlālakālibhir upaskṛtam unnasaṁ naḥ
nīla
bluish
alaka
with hair
alibhiḥ
beelike
upaskṛtam
thus being beautiful
unnasam
with a raised nose
naḥ
to me
svānāṁ pradarśaya manasvini valgu-vākyam
svānām
who am yours
pradarśaya
please show
manasvini
O most thoughtful lady
valgu-vākyam
with sweet words.
My dear wife, your teeth are very beautifully set, and your attractive features make you appear very thoughtful. Kindly give up your anger, be merciful upon me, and please smile upon me with loving attachment. When I see a smile on your beautiful face, and when I see your hair, which is as beautiful as the color blue, and see your raised nose and hear your sweet talk, you will become more beautiful to me and thus attract me and oblige me. You are my most respected mistress.

An effeminate husband, simply being attracted by the external beauty of his wife, tries to become her most obedient servant. Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has therefore advised that we not become attracted by a lump of flesh and blood. The story is told that at one time a man, very much attracted to a beautiful woman, wooed the woman in such a way that she devised a plan to show him the ingredients of her beauty. The woman made a date to see him, and before seeing him she took a purgative, and that whole day and night she simply passed stool, and she preserved that stool in a pot. The next night, when the man came to see her, she appeared very ugly and emaciated. When the man inquired from her about the woman with whom he had an engagement, she replied, “I am that very woman.” The man refused to believe her, not knowing that she had lost all her beauty due to the violent purgative that caused her to pass stool day and night. When the man began to argue with her, the woman said that she was not looking beautiful because she was separated from the ingredients of her beauty. When the man asked how she could be so separated, the woman said, “Come on, and I will show you.” She then showed him the pot filled with liquid stool and vomit. Thus the man became aware that a beautiful woman is simply a lump of matter composed of blood, stool, urine and similar other disgusting ingredients. This is the actual fact, but in a state of illusion, man becomes attracted by illusory beauty and becomes a victim of māyā.

King Purañjana begged his Queen to return to her original beauty. He tried to revive her just as a living entity tries to revive his original consciousness, Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which is very beautiful. All the beautiful features of the Queen could be compared to the beautiful features of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. When one returns to his original Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he actually becomes steady, and his life becomes successful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Beautiful woman! Show your face with beautiful teeth, brow, and nose, with sweet words and languid, bright, smiling glances indicating attachment and shyness, decorated with black locks like a swarm of bees. Having given punishment, now give mercy. You are my mistress (sā). You have languid, bright, smiling glances showing attraction, and shyness and sweet words. The devotee prays, “That is certainly my previous intelligence. May she become favorable and steady!”
Your teeth are beautiful, your thoughtful features, your hair — please smile, give up anger. Even desperate flattery often misses the actual wound; sweet words can't reach what required earlier action.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying to flatter past a wound that required earlier presence?
  • What does it cost me that I now have to compliment what I should have once protected?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.24

↗
तस्मिन्दधे दममहं तव वीरपत्नि योऽन्यत्र भूसुरकुलात्कृतकिल्बिषस्तम् । पश्ये न वीतभयमुन्मुदितं त्रिलोक्या- मन्यत्र वै मुररिपोरितरत्र दासात् ॥ २४ ॥
tasmin dadhe damam ahaṁ tava vīra-patni
[tasmin dadhe damam aham tava veera-patni]
yo ’nyatra bhūsura-kulāt kṛta-kilbiṣas tam
[yo ’nyatra bhoosura-kulaat krita-kilbishas tam]
paśye na vīta-bhayam unmuditaṁ tri-lokyām
[pashye na veeta-bhayam unmuditam tri-lokyaam]
anyatra vai mura-ripor itaratra dāsāt
[anyatra vai mura-ripor itaratra daasaat]
tasmin — unto him dadhe — shall give damam — punishment aham — I tava — to you vīra-patni — O wife of the hero yaḥ — one who anyatra — besides bhū-sura-kulāt — from the group of demigods on this earth (the brāhmaṇas) kṛta — done kilbiṣaḥ — offense tam — him paśye — I see na — not vīta — without bhayam — fear unmuditam — without anxiety tri-lokyām — within the three worlds anyatra — elsewhere vai — certainly mura-ripoḥ — of the enemy of Mura (Kṛṣṇa) itaratra — on the other hand dāsāt — than the servant.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmin dadhe damam ahaṁ tava vīra-patni
tasmin
unto him
dadhe
shall give
damam
punishment
aham
I
tava
to you
vīra-patni
O wife of the hero
yo ’nyatra bhūsura-kulāt kṛta-kilbiṣas tam
yaḥ
one who
paśye na vīta-bhayam unmuditaṁ tri-lokyām
anyatra vai mura-ripor itaratra dāsāt
anyatra
besides
bhū-sura-kulāt
from the group of demigods on this earth (the brāhmaṇas)
kṛta
done
kilbiṣaḥ
offense
tam
him
paśye
I see
na
not
vīta
without
bhayam
fear
unmuditam
without anxiety
tri-lokyām
within the three worlds
anyatra
elsewhere
vai
certainly
mura-ripoḥ
of the enemy of Mura (Kṛṣṇa)
itaratra
on the other hand
dāsāt
than the servant.
O hero’s wife, kindly tell me if someone has offended you. I am prepared to give such a person punishment as long as he does not belong to the brāhmaṇa caste. But for the servant of Muraripu [Kṛṣṇa], I excuse no one within or beyond these three worlds. No one can freely move after offending you, for I am prepared to punish him.

According to Vedic civilization, a brāhmaṇa, or one who is properly qualified to understand the Absolute Truth — that is, one belonging to the most intelligent social order — as well as the devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is known as Muradviṣa, enemy of a demon named Mura, is not subject to the rules and regulations of the state. In other words, upon breaking the laws of the state, everyone can be punished by the government except the brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas. Brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas never transgress the laws of the state or the laws of nature because they know perfectly well the resultant reactions caused by such law-breaking. Even though they may sometimes appear to violate the laws, they are not to be punished by the king. This instruction was given to King Prācīnabarhiṣat by Nārada Muni. King Purañjana was a representative of King Prācīnabarhiṣat, and Nārada Muni was reminding King Prācīnabarhiṣat of his forefather, Mahārāja Pṛthu, who never chastised a brāhmaṇa or a Vaiṣṇava.

One’s pure intelligence, or pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness, becomes polluted by material activities. Pure consciousness can be revived by the process of sacrifice, charity, pious activities, etc., but when one pollutes his Kṛṣṇa consciousness by offending a brāhmaṇa or a Vaiṣṇava, it is very difficult to revive. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has described the vaiṣṇava-aparādha, or offense to a Vaiṣṇava, as “the mad elephant offense.” One should be very careful not to offend a Vaiṣṇava or a brāhmaṇa. Even the great yogī Durvāsā was harassed by the Sudarśana cakra when he offended the Vaiṣṇava Mahārāja Ambarīṣa, who was neither a brāhmaṇa nor a sannyāsī but an ordinary householder. Mahārāja Ambarīṣa was a Vaiṣṇava, and consequently Durvāsā Muni was chastised.

The conclusion is that if Kṛṣṇa consciousness is covered by material sins, one can eliminate the sins simply by chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra, but if one pollutes his Kṛṣṇa consciousness by offending a brāhmaṇa or a Vaiṣṇava, one cannot revive it until one properly atones for the sin by pleasing the offended Vaiṣṇava or brāhmaṇa. This was the course that Durvāsā Muni had to follow, for he surrendered unto Mahārāja Ambarīṣa. A vaiṣṇava-aparādha cannot be atoned for by any means other than by begging the pardon of the offended Vaiṣṇava.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O wife of a hero! Except for the brāhmaṇa and the Vaiṣṇava, I will punish anyone who has offended you. I do not see anyone in the three worlds who can remain fearless and joyful in my presence other than these two. O wife of a hero! You are the wife of a king! I will punish whoever has offended you, because I belong to you (aham tava), I am dependent on you. But I do not have power over the brāhmaṇas and the servants of Viṣṇu. Purañjana is actually Prācīnabarhiṣat, who would not break the rules established by his father and grandfather (Pṛthu). The rule was: sarvatrāskhalitādeśaḥ sapta-dvīpaika-daṇḍa-dhṛk anyatra brāhmaṇa-kulād anyatrācyuta-gotrataḥ His order was unchallenged anywhere. He had authority over all except the brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas. SB 4.21.12 Pṛthu would not punish or take taxes from the brāhmaṇas or Vaiṣṇavas. Other than these two, I do not see anyone in the three worlds or beyond the three worlds who can remain without fear and have great joy. That offender will die out of fear of me. Spiritually speaking, the following is implied. “If I have faults because of old impressions or committing sin, I will perform charity, vows and pious acts to atone (damam) for the faults. But if an obstacle has arisen from the anger of a brāhmaṇa or offense to a Vaiṣṇava, that is difficult to remove. Except for offenses to brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas I can make atonement. The only relief from offending these two is their mercy, and nothing else.” He speaks with pride at being able to uproot irreligion in the last two lines of the verse.
If anyone has offended you, I'll punish them (except a brāhmaṇa or Vaiṣṇava). The honorable man identifies whose abuse he won't tolerate — and also names the categories he won't act against.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose protection of me requires me to specify whom I won't fight back against?
  • Where do I need to declare both who I'd punish and who I'd never touch?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.25

↗
वक्त्रं न ते वितिलकं मलिनं विहर्षं संरम्भभीममविमृष्टमपेतरागम् । पश्ये स्तनावपि शुचोपहतौ सुजातौ बिम्बाधरं विगतकुङ्कुमपङ्करागम् ॥ २५ ॥
vaktraṁ na te vitilakaṁ malinaṁ viharṣaṁ
[vaktram na te vitilakam malinam viharsham]
saṁrambha-bhīmam avimṛṣṭam apeta-rāgam
[samrambha-bheemam avimrishtam apeta-raagam]
paśye stanāv api śucopahatau sujātau
[pashye stanaav api shuchopahatau sujaatau]
bimbādharaṁ vigata-kuṅkuma-paṅka-rāgam
[bimbaadharam vigata-kunkuma-panka-raagam]
vaktram — face na — never te — your vitilakam — without being decorated malinam — unclean viharṣam — morose saṁrambha — with anger bhīmam — dangerous avimṛṣṭam — without luster apeta-rāgam — without affection paśye — I have seen stanau — your breasts api — also śucā-upahatau — wet because of your tears su-jātau — so nice bimba-adharam — red lips vigata — without kuṅkuma-paṅka — saffron rāgam — color.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vaktraṁ na te vitilakaṁ malinaṁ viharṣaṁ
vaktram
face
na
never
te
your
vitilakam
without being decorated
malinam
unclean
viharṣam
morose
saṁrambha-bhīmam avimṛṣṭam apeta-rāgam
saṁrambha
with anger
bhīmam
dangerous
avimṛṣṭam
without luster
apeta-rāgam
without affection
paśye stanāv api śucopahatau sujātau
paśye
I have seen
stanau
your breasts
api
also
śucā-upahatau
wet because of your tears
su-jātau
so nice
bimbādharaṁ vigata-kuṅkuma-paṅka-rāgam
bimba-adharam
red lips
vigata
without
kuṅkuma-paṅka
saffron
rāgam
color.
My dear wife, until this day I have never seen your face without tilaka decorations, nor have I seen you so morose and without luster or affection. Nor have I seen your two nice breasts wet with tears from your eyes. Nor have I ever before seen your lips, which are ordinarily as red as the bimba fruit, without their reddish hue.

Every woman looks very beautiful when decorated with tilaka and vermillion. A woman generally becomes very attractive when her lips are colored with reddish saffron or vermillion. But when one’s consciousness and intelligence are without any brilliant thoughts about Kṛṣṇa, they become morose and lusterless, so much so that one cannot derive any benefit despite sharp intelligence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I never see your face without tilaka, soiled and devoid of joy, frightful with anger, dull, and without affection. I never see your splendid breasts soaked in tears, or your red lips without betel stain. I never see your face without tilaka. Now I see it without tilaka. That is my misfortune. I never see you without red lips stained with betel (kuṁkuma-paṅka-rāgam). In another version, the phrase modified “breasts.” The present condition indicates that the intelligence is not pleased as she was formerly.
I've never seen you without tilaka, this morose, your breasts tear-wet, your bimba-red lips faded. Detailed observation of a beloved's distress is itself a kind of apology; you notice what you neglected.
Reflection Questions
  • What detailed change in someone close have I not let myself observe because the observation would indict me?
  • Where would careful noticing be more honest than gestures of repair?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.26.26

↗
तन्मे प्रसीद सुहृद: कृतकिल्बिषस्य स्वैरं गतस्य मृगयां व्यसनातुरस्य । का देवरं वशगतं कुसुमास्त्रवेग विस्रस्तपौंस्‍नमुशती न भजेत कृत्ये ॥ २६ ॥
tan me prasīda suhṛdaḥ kṛta-kilbiṣasya
[tan me praseeda suhridah krita-kilbishasya]
svairaṁ gatasya mṛgayāṁ vyasanāturasya
[svairam gatasya mrigayaam vyasanaaturasya]
kā devaraṁ vaśa-gataṁ kusumāstra-vega-
[kaa devaram vasha-gatam kusumaastra-vega-]
visrasta-pauṁsnam uśatī na bhajeta kṛtye
[visrasta-paumsnam ushatee na bhajeta kritye]
tat — therefore me — unto me prasīda — be kind su-hṛdaḥ — intimate friend kṛta-kilbiṣasya — having committed sinful activities svairam — independently gatasya — who went mṛgayām — hunting vyasana-āturasya — being influenced by sinful desire kā — what woman devaram — the husband vaśa-gatam — under her control kusuma-astra-vega — pierced by the arrow of Cupid visrasta — scattered pauṁsnam — his patience uśatī — very beautiful na — never bhajeta — would embrace kṛtye — in proper duty.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tan me prasīda suhṛdaḥ kṛta-kilbiṣasya
tat
therefore
me
unto me
prasīda
be kind
su-hṛdaḥ
intimate friend
kṛta-kilbiṣasya
having committed sinful activities
svairaṁ gatasya mṛgayāṁ vyasanāturasya
svairam
independently
gatasya
who went
mṛgayām
hunting
vyasana-āturasya
being influenced by sinful desire
kā devaraṁ vaśa-gataṁ kusumāstra-vega-
kā
what woman
devaram
the husband
vaśa-gatam
under her control
kusuma-astra-vega
pierced by the arrow of Cupid
visrasta-pauṁsnam uśatī na bhajeta kṛtye
visrasta
scattered
pauṁsnam
his patience
uśatī
very beautiful
na
never
bhajeta
would embrace
kṛtye
in proper duty.
My dear Queen, due to my sinful desires I went to the forest to hunt without asking you. Therefore I must admit that I have offended you. Nonetheless, thinking of me as your most intimate subordinate, you should still be very much pleased with me. Factually I am very much bereaved, but being pierced by the arrow of Cupid, I am feeling lusty. But where is the beautiful woman who would give up her lusty husband and refuse to unite with him?

Both man and woman desire one another; that is the basic principle of material existence. Women in general always keep themselves beautiful so that they can be attractive to their lusty husbands. When a lusty husband comes before his wife, the wife takes advantage of his aggressive activities and enjoys life. Generally when a woman is attacked by a man — whether her husband or some other man — she enjoys the attack, being too lusty. In other words, when one’s intelligence is properly utilized, both the intellect and the intelligent person enjoy one another with great satisfaction. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (7.9.45) :

yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tucchaṁ kaṇḍūyanena karayor iva duḥkha-duḥkham

The actual happiness of the karmīs is sex life. They work very hard outside the home, and to satiate themselves after their hard labor, they come home to enjoy sex life. King Purañjana went to the forest to hunt, and after his hard labor he returned home to enjoy sex life. If a man lives outside the home and spends a week in a city or somewhere else, at the end of the week he becomes very anxious to return home and enjoy sex with his wife. This is confirmed in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam: yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham. Karmīs work very hard simply to enjoy sex. Modern human society has improved the materialistic way of life simply by inducing unrestricted sex life in many different ways. This is most prominently visible in the Western world.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Fourth Canto, Twenty-sixth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “King Purañjana Goes to the Forest to Hunt, and His Queen Becomes Angry.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Be kind to me, your friend, suffering from attachment, who committed sin by going to hunt on my own! For amorous activities, what woman would not embrace her husband under her control, whose independence has been shattered by the agitation of Cupid’s arrow? He prays for the mercy of his wife. Devaram (beloved husband) means “he who bestows (ra) amusement (deva).” His independence as a man (pauṁsnam) has been shattered by the agitation of Cupid’s arrow. Who would not accept such a husband for affectionate activities of love (uśatī-kṛtye)? This verse describes directly meeting with the dharmic intelligence. Be pleased and reside in my heart. I am uncontrollable (svairam), having committed sin by going hunting and killing. Hunting and committing sin are equivalent in meaning according to the dictionary. Good intelligence should be situated with him. He expresses this principle by a particular question. Just as a woman does not give up her lover who has done wrong, so intelligence should not give me up. O good intelligence! Do not give me up. Thus ends the commentary on the Twenty-sixth Chapter of the Fourth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty-seven Purañjana Enjoys Life
I went hunting without asking you; I admit my offense; please regard me as your intimate subordinate again. The right apology names the offense, the right relationship, and the request for restoration.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I attempting apology without all three elements (offense named, relationship named, restoration requested)?
  • Whose 'intimate subordinate' status am I overdue to formally re-request?
📝 My note