FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

2.10 · Bhāgavatam Is the Answer to All Questions

47 verses · 🖨 Class prep
T Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16971 chars)

T - Total Theology (8-10) Sukadeva Goswami revealed the four seed verses of the Srimad-Bhagavatam ( catuh-sloki ) which were originally spoken to Lord Brahma. These verses encapsulate the total theology of Vaisnavism, and from them expand the ten subjects of the Srimad-Bhagavatam and all further subject matter.

Previous Importance of Creation Next Theological Enquiries Last updated 1 year ago

T - Total Theology (8-10)

T - Total Theology (8-10) Sukadeva Goswami revealed the four seed verses of the Srimad-Bhagavatam ( catuh-sloki ) which were originally spoken to Lord Brahma. These verses encapsulate the total theology of Vaisnavism, and from them expand the ten subjects of the Srimad-Bhagavatam and all further subject matter.

Previous Importance of Creation Next Theological Enquiries Last updated 1 year ago

Prelude to Canto 3 (Vidura)

T - Total Theology (8-10) Prelude to Canto 3 (Vidura) Chapter 10 Though they appreciated the discussions regarding creation and destruction of the material world, the sages were more inclined to hear subject matters of a transcendental nature. Saunaka Rishi thus returns to the discussion in Canto One, Chapter 13, and enquires about Vidura, who had left Hastinapura and met Maitreya Rishi on his travels. He enquires about the discussions between these two great personalities. He also wants to know Vidura’s history; why he left the palace, his activities on pilgrimage and how he eventually returned to meet his brother and relatives. Suta Goswami thus narrates these events, recounting how Sukadeva Goswami explained the very same points to Maharaja Pariksit.

Previous Total Theology in Ten Subjects Next Ten Truths Last updated 1 year ago

Ten Truths

T - Total Theology (8-10) Ten Truths “The ten characteristics, as will be explained in the next chapter, require so many verses just to explain them properly. Brahmaji had also advised Narada previously that he should expand the idea he had heard from Brahmaji. Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu instructed this to Srila Rupa Goswami in a nutshell, but the disciple Rupa Goswami expanded this very elaborately, and the same subject was further expanded by Jiva Goswami and even further by Sri Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura. We are just trying to follow in the footsteps of all these authorities. So Srimad-Bhagavatam is not like ordinary fiction or mundane literature. It is unlimited in strength, and however one may expand it according to one’s own ability, Bhagavatam still cannot be finished by such expansion. Srimad-Bhagavatam, being the sound representation of the Lord, is simultaneously explained in four verses and in four billion verses all the same, inasmuch as the Lord is smaller than the atom and bigger than the unlimited sky. Such is the potency of Srimad-Bhagavatam.” (SB 2.9.44 )

Previous Prelude to Canto 3 (Vidura) Next Four Verses Last updated 1 year ago

Four Verses

T - Total Theology (8-10) Ten Truths Four Verses When Lord Brahma, bewildered about his purpose, heard the word ‘tapa,’ he immediately sat in meditation and dedicated himself for 1,000 celestial years. While the Sanskrit word ‘tapa’ commonly refers to austerity, it also implies ‘heating’ – the formidable fire of sacrifice and selfless devotion which is the core substance of a dynamic spiritual life. When Krishna eventually appeared before Brahma, the universal engineer placed four enquiries before Him:

What are the material and spiritual forms of the Lord?

How do the material and spiritual energies of the Lord work?

How does the Lord utilise His different energies?

How may I be instructed to discharge my duties and function?

The four answers he received became known as the catuh-sloki Bhagavatam. The key points are as follows: 2.9.33 and 2.9.34 – Sambandha (knowledge of the relationship) Krishna outlines three aspects of reality – isvara , jiva and prakrti . He explains how the Supreme Lord ( isvara ) is eternal and causeless. Material nature ( prakrti ) is periodically manifested from Him, and thus He existed before its creation and continues to exist after its annihilation. The living entities ( jiva ) are entrapped in the prakrti , unable to see things in connection with the Supreme Lord and thus engaged in the hard struggle for existence. 2.9.36 – Abhideya (cultivation of the relationship) Yoga is the connecting process which re-establishes the relationship between jiva and isvara . The progressive spiritualist must enquire from qualified persons and learn how exactly to practice this linking process. Having learned these details, one should engage themselves with one-pointed determination, making this effort one’s life and soul, regardless of the periodic distractions of material affairs. 2.9.35 – Prayojana (perfection of the relationship) The Supreme Lord is within this manifestation and simultaneously beyond this material manifestation, performing His eternal pastimes in the spiritual world. For one who has developed pure love of Krishna, they can directly perceive His presence at every moment, because He is inside and outside of everything. Srila Prabhupada explains further: “The Lord’s name, form, qualities, pastimes, entourage, etc., as they are described in the revealed scriptures or as performed in the Vaikunthalokas, far, far beyond the material cosmic manifestation, are factually being televised in the heart of the devotee.” ( SB 2.9.35 ) These three topics ( sambandha, abhideya, prayojana ) underpin numerous Vaisnava scriptures and map a high-level progression of our spiritual journey. The metaphor of ‘stepping forward’ may be useful in this regard. In material life, we have two feet in the material world and can’t see anything beyond. Preoccupied with the daily demands of life, we live oblivious to the fact that there are deeper truths behind our existence and higher goals to strive for. At a certain point in the material sojourn, we begin to explore whether there is something beyond our immediate cares and concerns. After contacting genuine spiritual teachings, we come to the stage of sambandha, where we receive information on the spiritual reality and can put our current material life in context. Our feet are still very much in the material world, but now we can see something exciting in the distance. We have formulated an understanding of the bigger picture. With the association of spiritually minded persons ( sadhu-sanga ), our faith deepens and inspiration grows. We get the impetus to step forward and move towards that spiritual reality by placing one foot forward. This is known as abhideya , or the point at which we start making a commitment to the spiritual process. In the beginning, the commitment is very basic, just like the front leg which has moved forward but is just grazing the ground, with all the weight remaining on the back leg. As the abhideya matures, more weight is placed on the front foot (of spiritual commitment) and the weight automatically comes off the back foot (of material concern). Now we have one foot in the material world and one foot in the spiritual world As one advances in the process, along with a deepening of faith is a tangible experience of spiritual feeling which begins with attraction, advances to attachment, deepens into spiritual emotion and culminates in pure love. Here one has made the complete shift, with the back leg coming forward, and the living entity is now practically living in the spiritual world, experiencing complete absorption of mind, body and soul. This is known as prayojana , or the perfection of the relationship.

Previous Ten Truths Next Ten Topics Last updated 1 year ago

Ten Topics

T - Total Theology (8-10) Ten Truths Ten Topics Just as the Bhagavad-gita encompasses five main topics ( atma, prakrti, karma, kala and isvara ), the Srimad-Bhagavatam is composed of ten foundational subjects. Different teachers have varying explanations of the ten topics and their correlation to the Cantos. Jiva Goswami, the pre-eminent authority in the Gaudiya lineage, states that these topics are contained within each Canto, to a greater or lesser degree. In Tattva-sandarbha, the Goswami briefly discusses the scope of each subject, explaining that the first nine topics exist simply to help one approach and appreciate the tenth topic – the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna, who is the shelter of all.

Sarga (Elemental Creation)

Material universes are created to facilitate the desire of the living entity to exercise independence from the Lord. The process of creation begins with manifesting the basic ingredients - the five gross elements ( panca-bhutas ) are earth, water, fire, air and ether; the five objects of sensual perception ( tanmatras ) are sound, form, taste, smell, and touch; and the five knowledge acquiring senses ( jnanendriyas ) are the eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin. Together with the mind, these sixteen principles are created by the first purusa incarnation, Maha Vishnu. Within these sixteen principles, eight other principles exist subtly, making a total of twenty-four principles.

Visarga (Brahma’s Creation)

Conditioned living entities are illusioned to live in their ‘own worlds,’ thinking themselves to be unique and independent from others. To facilitate this illusory concept of life, the universe is full of variegatedness. By manipulating the original ‘building blocks’ of material existence, Brahma engineers a subsequent creation, more accurately described as an assembling of universal ingredients. Thus, a variety of life forms are created, each with a unique configuration and psychophysical makeup.

Sthanam (Maintenance and Planetary Systems)

The Lord creates a suitable situation ( sthanam ) for the living entities to dwell in the material world and play out their desires, maintaining them however rebellious they may be. The supreme sthanam is Vaikuntha, the place where one can escape all misery and find eternal happiness. The Lord provides instructions to guide the living entities back there, since all situations in the material world are ultimately frustrating and entangling.

Posanam (Protection and Mercy of the Lord)

According to one’s mentality and desires, the Lord reciprocates by offering protection and nourishment. Krishna maintains our gross physical body by arranging fundamental resources that provide the energy of life. He also maintains our subtle cognition by facilitating knowledge, remembrance and forgetfulness. For those who engage themselves in devotional service, the Lord offers spiritual mercy and protection so that they may quickly return to their original position; if someone takes one step to Krishna, He takes ten steps towards that devotee.

Utayah (The Creative Impetus)

Bewildered by false ego, the living entity thinks himself the ‘doer,’ and thus engages in a variety of fruitive activities aimed at controlling and enjoying material nature. Every material activity we perform creates a residual impression within our psyche which we carry forward life after life. The accumulation of these impressions form our creative impetus.

Manvantara (Change of Manus)

Manus are the kings who father mankind, and the manvantara signifies the time of their reign. These leaders deliver invaluable instructions which regulate the activities of living entities in a manner that will be for their material and spiritual welfare. They also provide an inspirational example for the world to follow. When the living entities embrace the path of righteousness, the Lord provides them with all protection by which they may attain their constitutional situation in the spirit world.

Isanukatha (Activities of the Incarnations)

Throughout cosmic history, Krishna periodically descends to earth and reveals knowledge of the eternal reality. He annihilates demoniac influences, lovingly engages with His devotees, and re-establishes genuine spirituality within society. After the Lord returns to His abode, the recorded histories and accounts of His appearance have the same uplifting effect on anyone who attentively hears them.

Nirodha (Universal Dissolution)

When cosmic time comes to its cyclical break, living entities who desire to remain in the material world merge into the body of Maha Vishnu to await the next universal creation, and another opportunity to re-establish their relationship with God. This temporary period of relief is technically called nirodha , or the winding up of the cosmic manifestation. Even though the entire creation is dismantled, the desire of living entities to continue their material existence remains – that’s the power of material desire, which can survive beyond universal time.

Mukti (Liberation)

When living entities renounce all external identification with the principles of material existence, they are reinstated to their original spiritual identity as eternal servants of Krishna. After entering Vaikuntha, the spiritual abode of the Lord, they function in their constitutional position. This is known as mukti or liberation.

Asrayah (Supreme Shelter)

The nine topics of the Srimad-Bhagavatam are meant to bring one to a deep understanding of the tenth, and most important, topic – the Supreme Lord, the Supreme source and shelter of all existence. When we re-establish our relationship with Krishna, all problems are solved, everything makes complete sense and life becomes a dynamic experience of spiritual joy.

Through these ten topics, Srimad-Bhagavatam offers us a comprehensive instruction manual to navigate our lives in this material world: “ Srimad-Bhagavatam is declared to be the essence of all Vedanta philosophy. One who has felt satisfaction from its nectarean mellow will never be attracted to any other literature .” ( SB 12.13.15 )

Previous Four Verses Next S.A.V.E.S Last updated 1 year ago

Theological Enquiries

T - Total Theology (8-10) Theological Enquiries Chapter 8 Maharaja Pariksit was enlivened to hear Brahma’s answers regarding universal creation. His eagerness to hear topics of the Lord was growing. The saintly King stimulated further conversation by asking a variety of questions exploring the philosophical truths of the cosmos and the spirit soul’s sojourn within it. In particular, he enquired about:

The spirit soul’s acceptance of material bodies and the Lord’s appearance in human form

The relative position of Vishnu, demigods, and the Universal Form

Divisions of time, creation of planets and species, and cosmic yuga cycles

Vedic literatures, devotional service, and the four goals of human life ( dharma, arta, kama, moksa )

Such precise and detailed enquiries, and the illuminating answers in response, reconfirm the Vedic version to be the most complete theological revelation in the world.

Previous T - Total Theology (8-10) Next Total Theology in Four Verses Last updated 1 year ago

Total Theology in Four Verses

T - Total Theology (8-10) Total Theology in Four Verses Chapter 9 Sukadeva Goswami explained how the conditioned living entity is influenced by illusion ( maya ) and cemented in the material conception of ‘I’ and ‘mine.’ Through cultivation of spiritual practices, however, one can break free and reinstate themselves in reality. To explain, Sukadeva Goswami narrated the story of Lord Brahma’s enlightenment. After being born upon a lotus stem, Brahma was puzzled as to what the purpose of his existence was, and he thus engaged in 1,000 celestial years of penance. The Lord, pleased by his steadfast determination and devotion, gave him a vision of the transcendental abode. Seizing this rare opportunity, Brahma humbly placed four principal enquiries before the Lord, who replied in four powerful statements, now known as the original Bhagavatam in four verses ( catuh-sloki ). Brahma was fully satisfied by the succinct but comprehensive, answers. [ 9 ] The Lord then disappeared, after which Brahma began to engineer the entire universe.

Previous Theological Enquiries Next Total Theology in Ten Subjects Last updated 1 year ago

Total Theology in Ten Subjects

T - Total Theology (8-10) Total Theology in Ten Subjects Chapter 10 Sukadeva Goswami then expanded on the four verses and enumerated the ten primary subjects of Srimad-Bhagavatam. He continued on to briefly describe elemental creation ( sarga ) and secondary creation ( visarga ). Sarga usually happens at the beginning of Brahma’s life and visarga at the beginning of Brahma’s day. Although the Lord is the overseer of creation, His primary interest is to enjoy spiritual pastimes with His loving associates. Thus, He delegates the responsibilities of universal affairs to the demigods. The first nine topics of Srimad-Bhagavatam are enumerated simply to introduce one to the tenth, most special and sublime topic – the most beautiful Lord Krishna, who is the ultimate shelter of everything ( asraya ).

Previous Total Theology in Four Verses Next Prelude to Canto 3 (Vidura) Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.1

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच अत्र सर्गो विसर्गश्च स्थानं पोषणमूतय: । मन्वन्तरेशानुकथा निरोधो मुक्तिराश्रय: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
atra sargo visargaś ca
[atra sargo visargash cha]
sthānaṁ poṣaṇam ūtayaḥ
[sthaanam poshanam ootayah]
manvantareśānukathā
[manvantareshaanukathaa]
nirodho muktir āśrayaḥ
[nirodho muktir aashrayah]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said atra — in this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam sargaḥ — statement of the creation of the universe visargaḥ — statement of subcreation ca — also sthānam — the planetary systems poṣaṇam — protection ūtayaḥ — the creative impetus manvantara — changes of Manus īśa-anukathāḥ — the science of God nirodhaḥ — going back home, back to Godhead muktiḥ — liberation āśrayaḥ — the summum bonum..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
atra sargo visargaś ca
atra
in this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam
sargaḥ
statement of the creation of the universe
visargaḥ
statement of subcreation
ca
also
sthānaṁ poṣaṇam ūtayaḥ
sthānam
the planetary systems
poṣaṇam
protection
ūtayaḥ
the creative impetus
manvantareśānukathā
manvantara
changes of Manus
īśa-anukathāḥ
the science of God
nirodho muktir āśrayaḥ
nirodhaḥ
going back home, back to Godhead
muktiḥ
liberation
āśrayaḥ
the summum bonum..
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: In the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam there are ten divisions of statements regarding the following: the creation of the universe, subcreation, planetary systems, protection by the Lord, the creative impetus, the change of Manus, the science of God, returning home, back to Godhead, liberation, and the summum bonum.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: In this Purāṇa there are ten topics: creation, secondary creation, protection, mercy of the Lord, material activities, the conduct of the Manus, stories of the Lord, destruction of the universe, liberation and the ultimate shelter.
Commentary

In this chapter the ten subject matters of the Bhāgavatam are described, starting with creation and sub-creation. The divisions of adhyātmā, adhibhūta and adhidaiva are also described.

At the end of the last chapter the Bhāgavatam was described as having ten characteristics. These are shown in this verse. Manvantareśānukathā is a dvandva compound indicating two items.

The Bhāgavatam covers ten topics: creation, subcreation, planets, divine protection, creative impulse, the Manus, the science of God, the way back home, liberation, and the summum bonum. The book is organized; serious reading benefits from knowing its map.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of these ten do I most resist studying, and why?
  • How does seeing the structure help me return to the central topic — the summum bonum?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.2

↗
दशमस्य विशुद्ध्यर्थं नवानामिह लक्षणम् । वर्णयन्ति महात्मान: श्रुतेनार्थेन चाञ्जसा ॥ २ ॥
daśamasya viśuddhy-arthaṁ
[dashamasya vishuddhy-artham]
navānām iha lakṣaṇam
[navaanaam iha lakshanam]
varṇayanti mahātmānaḥ
[varnayanti mahaatmaanah]
śrutenārthena cāñjasā
[shrutenaarthena chaanjasaa]
daśamasya — of the summum bonum viśuddhi — isolation artham — purpose navānām — of the other nine iha — in this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam lakṣaṇam — symptoms varṇayanti — they describe mahā-ātmānaḥ — the great sages śrutena — by Vedic evidences arthena — by direct explanation ca — and añjasā — summarily.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
daśamasya viśuddhy-arthaṁ
daśamasya
of the summum bonum
viśuddhi
isolation
artham
purpose
navānām iha lakṣaṇam
navānām
of the other nine
iha
in this Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam
lakṣaṇam
symptoms
varṇayanti mahātmānaḥ
varṇayanti
they describe
mahā-ātmānaḥ
the great sages
śrutenārthena cāñjasā
śrutena
by Vedic evidences
arthena
by direct explanation
ca
and
añjasā
summarily.
To isolate the transcendence of the summum bonum, the symptoms of the rest are described sometimes by Vedic inference, sometimes by direct explanation, and sometimes by summary explanations given by the great sages.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The great devotees such as Vidura and Maitreya describe properly the nine topics in order to impart the highest knowledge of the tenth topic, through the words of the scripture and stories to illustrate their meaning.
Commentary

Will there be different meanings to this in different scriptures? The devotees describe the nature of the nine topics in order to impart knowledge of the truth, unmixed with anything else, of the tenth topic -- the shelter. Other things which are excluded as the shelter include Svarga and hell, which are only the jivās’ destinations, caused by the Supreme Lord. These places indicate that only the jīvas’ bodies are subject to creation maintenance and destruction. That there is only one shelter is not a fault, since that is the conclusion of scriptures. The devotees describe these topics with meaning coming from the śrutis and by stories illustrating the meaning of the śrutis. The devotees such as Vidura and Maitreya describe these topics.

All other topics exist to isolate the transcendence of the summum bonum — the supreme good. Some are explained directly, some by inference, some by summary. Don't get lost in the supporting matter; everything is in service of one thing.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I gotten so absorbed in supporting topics that the summum bonum has receded?
  • What single shift would re-center my reading on the Person at the center?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.3

↗
भूतमात्रेन्द्रियधियां जन्म सर्ग उदाहृत: । ब्रह्मणो गुणवैषम्याद्विसर्ग: पौरुष: स्मृत: ॥ ३ ॥
bhūta-mātrendriya-dhiyāṁ
[bhoota-maatrendriya-dhiyaam]
janma sarga udāhṛtaḥ
[janma sarga udaahritah]
brahmaṇo guṇa-vaiṣamyād
[brahmano guna-vaishamyaad]
visargaḥ pauruṣaḥ smṛtaḥ
[visargah paurushah smritah]
bhūta — the five gross elements (the sky, etc.) mātrā — objects perceived by the senses indriya — the senses dhiyām — of the mind janma — creation sargaḥ — manifestation udāhṛtaḥ — is called the creation brahmaṇaḥ — of Brahmā, the first puruṣa guṇa-vaiṣamyāt — by interaction of the three modes of nature visargaḥ — re-creation pauruṣaḥ — resultant activities smṛtaḥ — it is so known.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūta-mātrendriya-dhiyāṁ
bhūta
the five gross elements (the sky, etc.)
mātrā
objects perceived by the senses
indriya
the senses
dhiyām
of the mind
janma sarga udāhṛtaḥ
janma
creation
sargaḥ
manifestation
udāhṛtaḥ
is called the creation
brahmaṇo guṇa-vaiṣamyād
brahmaṇaḥ
of Brahmā, the first puruṣa
guṇa-vaiṣamyāt
by interaction of the three modes of nature
visargaḥ pauruṣaḥ smṛtaḥ
visargaḥ
re-creation
pauruṣaḥ
resultant activities
smṛtaḥ
it is so known.
The elementary creation of sixteen items of matter — namely the five elements [fire, water, land, air and sky], sound, form, taste, smell, touch, and the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, skin and mind — is known as sarga, whereas subsequent resultant interaction of the modes of material nature is called visarga.

In order to explain the ten divisional symptoms of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, there are seven continuous verses. The first of these under reference pertains to the sixteen elementary manifestations of earth, water, etc., with material ego composed of material intelligence and mind. The subsequent creation is a result of the reactions of the above-mentioned sixteen energies of the first puruṣa, the Mahā-Viṣṇu incarnation of Govinda, as later explained by Brahmā in his treatise Brahma-saṁhitā (5.47) as follows:

yaḥ kāraṇārṇava-jale bhajati sma yoga- nidrām ananta-jagadaṇḍa-saroma-kūpaḥ ādhāra-śaktim avalambya parāṁ sva-mūrtiṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

The first puruṣa incarnation of Govinda, Lord Kṛṣṇa, known as the Mahā-Viṣṇu, goes into a yoga-nidrā mystic sleep, and the innumerable universes are situated in potency in each and every hair hole of His transcendental body.

As mentioned in the previous verse, śrutena (or with reference to the Vedic conclusions), the creation is made possible from the Supreme Personality of Godhead directly by manifestation of His particular energies. Without such a Vedic reference, the creation appears to be a product of material nature. This conclusion comes from a poor fund of knowledge. From Vedic reference it is concluded that the origin of all energies (namely internal, external and marginal) is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. And as explained hereinbefore, the illusory conclusion is that creation is made by the inert material nature. The Vedic conclusion is transcendental light, whereas the non-Vedic conclusion is material darkness. The internal potency of the Supreme Lord is identical with the Supreme Lord, and the external potency is enlivened in contact with the internal potency. The parts and parcels of the internal potency which react in contact with the external potency are called the marginal potency, or the living entities.

Thus the original creation is directly from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or Parambrahman, and the secondary creation, as a reactionary result of the original ingredients, is made by Brahmā. Thus the activities of the whole universe are started.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sarga refers to the manifestation of the gross material elements, the tan-mātrās, the senses, the false ego and mahat-tattva, caused when the Lord transforms the guṇas. Visarga is the creation of bodies for the jīvas carried out by Brahmā.
Commentary

Each topic is described. Sarga means the manifestation of elements, tan-mātrās, senses, ahaṅkāra and mahat-tattva (dhiyām) and as well their description in the universal form, caused when the Lord (brahmaṇaḥ) creates transformation of the guṇas. Paurusaḥ refers to Brahmā. Visarga refers to the creation of moving and non-moving entities by Brahmā. “Creation of the jīvas” means giving jīvas forms with intelligence, senses and body for engaging in material enjoyment, pursuing liberation or practicing bhakti according to their qualification. .

Sarga is the first creation — the sixteen ingredients of matter, senses, and mind. Visarga is the subsequent interaction of the modes. The structure of our experience is built from these basic ingredients combined under nature's three modes.
Reflection Questions
  • Can I trace any of my current experiences down to the sixteen-element interaction?
  • How does seeing experience as built rather than given change my relating to it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.4

↗
स्थितिर्वैकुण्ठविजय: पोषणं तदनुग्रह: । मन्वन्तराणि सद्धर्म ऊतय: कर्मवासना: ॥ ४ ॥
sthitir vaikuṇṭha-vijayaḥ
[sthitir vaikuntha-vijayah]
poṣaṇaṁ tad-anugrahaḥ
[poshanam tad-anugrahah]
manvantarāṇi sad-dharma
[manvantaraani sad-dharma]
ūtayaḥ karma-vāsanāḥ
[ootayah karma-vaasanaah]
sthitiḥ — the right situation vaikuṇṭha-vijayaḥ — the victory of the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha poṣaṇam — maintenance tat-anugrahaḥ — His causeless mercy manvantarāṇi — the reign of the Manus sat-dharmaḥ — perfect occupational duty ūtayaḥ — impetus to work karma-vāsanāḥ — desire for fruitive work.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sthitir vaikuṇṭha-vijayaḥ
sthitiḥ
the right situation
vaikuṇṭha-vijayaḥ
the victory of the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha
poṣaṇaṁ tad-anugrahaḥ
poṣaṇam
maintenance
tat-anugrahaḥ
His causeless mercy
manvantarāṇi sad-dharma
manvantarāṇi
the reign of the Manus
sat-dharmaḥ
perfect occupational duty
ūtayaḥ karma-vāsanāḥ
ūtayaḥ
impetus to work
karma-vāsanāḥ
desire for fruitive work.
The right situation for the living entities is to obey the laws of the Lord and thus be in perfect peace of mind under the protection of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Manus and their laws are meant to give right direction in life. The impetus for activity is the desire for fruitive work.

This material world is created, maintained for some time, and again annihilated by the will of the Lord. The ingredients for creation and the subordinate creator, Brahmā, are first created by Lord Viṣṇu in His first and second incarnations. The first puruṣa incarnation is Mahā-Viṣṇu, and the second puruṣa incarnation is the Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, from whom Brahmā is created. The third puruṣa-avatāra is the Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, who lives as the Supersoul of everything in the universe and maintains the creation generated by Brahmā. Śiva is one of the many sons of Brahmā, and he annihilates the creation. Therefore the original creator of the universe is Viṣṇu, and He is also the maintainer of the created beings by His causeless mercy. As such, it is the duty of all conditioned souls to acknowledge the victory of the Lord and thus become pure devotees and live peacefully in this world, where miseries and dangers are always in existence. The conditioned souls, who take this material creation as the place for satisfaction of the senses and thus are illusioned by the external energy of Viṣṇu, remain again to be subjected to the laws of material nature, creation and destruction.

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that beginning from the topmost planet of this universe down to the lowest planet, Pātālaloka, all are destructible, and the conditioned souls may travel in space either by good or bad work or by modern spacecraft, but they are sure to die everywhere, although the duration of life in different planets is different. The only means to attain eternal life is to go back home, back to Godhead, where there is no more rebirth as in the material planets. The conditioned souls, being unaware of this very simple fact because of forgetting their relationship with the Lord of Vaikuṇṭha, try to plan out a permanent life in this material world. Being illusioned by the external energy, they thus become engaged in various types of economic and religious development, forgetting that they are meant for going back home, back to Godhead. This forgetfulness is so strong due to the influence of māyā that the conditioned souls do not at all want to go back to Godhead. By sense enjoyment they become victims of birth and death repeatedly and thus spoil human lives which are chances for going back to Viṣṇu. The directive scriptures made by the Manus in different ages and millenniums are called sad-dharma, good guidance for the human beings, who should take advantage of all the revealed scriptures for their own interest, to make life’s successful termination. The creation is not false, but it is a temporary manifestation just to give a chance for the conditioned souls to go back to Godhead. The desire to go back to Godhead and functions performed in that direction form the right path of work. When such a regulative path is accepted, the Lord gives all protection to His devotees by His causeless mercy, while the nondevotees risk their own activities to bind themselves in a chain of fruitive reactions. The word sad-dharma is significant in this connection. Sad-dharma, or duty performed for going back to Godhead and thus becoming His unalloyed devotee, is the only pious activity; all others may pretend to be pious, but actually they are not. It is for this reason only that the Lord advises in the Bhagavad-gītā that one give up all so-called religious activities and completely engage in the devotional service of the Lord to become free from all anxieties due to the dangerous life of material existence. To work situated in sad-dharma is the right direction of life. One’s aim of life should be to go back home, back to Godhead, and not be subjected to repeated births and deaths in the material world by getting good or bad bodies for temporary existence. Herein lies the intelligence of human life, and one should desire the activities of life in that way.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sthānam refers to the Lord protecting his devotee. This shows the excellence of the Lord. Poṣaṇam means the Lord’s mercy. Manvantara refers to the conduct of the kings ruling the manvantara periods. Ūti refers to the impressions created by the jīva’s actions which lead them to future births.
Commentary

Sthānam (mentioned in verse 1) means protection (sthitiḥ) which shows the excellence (vijayaḥ) of the Supreme Lord (vaikuṇṭhasya) in comparison to Brahmā the creator and Śiva the destroyer. Sthitiḥ also refers to the condition of the jīvas. Or vaikuṇṭha-vijayaḥ can mean that the Lord destroys the suffering of the jīva, since jaya means “victory over.” After the creation, the condition the jīvas is described. In protecting the jīvas, the Lord shows his mercy to some, the devotees performing sādhana, even if they are involved in sin by accident. This is the meaning of poṣaṇam. Manvantara refers to the religious conduct of the kings reigning during the manvantara, revealed through narratives concerning them. This performance of dharma by the sāttvika-jīvas engaged in karma-yoga is considered within the conditions of the jīva in this world. Ūti refers to the impressions produced by action, “those things which are accomplished (ūyante) by actions.” It refers to the impressions arising from actions either low or high. Pious or impious acts become the cause of future happiness and distress. Within the condition of the jīvas in this world, the nature of the high and low jīvas is described.

The right situation for living entities is obedience to the Lord's laws, perfect peace under His protection. The Manus and their laws exist to give direction; the impetus for activity is the desire for fruitive work. Discipline is not a prison; it is the design.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my life is my desire for results outpacing my submission to His direction?
  • What 'law of the Lord' could I gladly obey today and experience the promised peace?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.5

↗
अवतारानुचरितं हरेश्चास्यानुवर्तिनाम् । पुंसामीशकथा: प्रोक्ता नानाख्यानोपबृंहिता: ॥ ५ ॥
avatārānucaritaṁ
[avataaraanucharitam]
hareś cāsyānuvartinām
[haresh chaasyaanuvartinaam]
puṁsām īśa-kathāḥ proktā
[pumsaam eesha-kathaah proktaa]
nānākhyānopabṛṁhitāḥ
[naanaakhyaanopabrimhitaah]
avatāra — incarnation of Godhead anucaritam — activities hareḥ — of the Personality of Godhead ca — also asya — of His anuvartinām — followers puṁsām — of the persons īśa-kathāḥ — the science of God proktāḥ — is said nānā — various ākhyāna — narrations upabṛṁhitāḥ — described.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
avatārānucaritaṁ
avatāra
incarnation of Godhead
anucaritam
activities
hareś cāsyānuvartinām
hareḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
ca
also
asya
of His
anuvartinām
followers
puṁsām īśa-kathāḥ proktā
puṁsām
of the persons
īśa-kathāḥ
the science of God
proktāḥ
is said
nānākhyānopabṛṁhitāḥ
nānā
various
ākhyāna
narrations
upabṛṁhitāḥ
described.
The science of God describes the incarnations of the Personality of Godhead and His different activities together with the activities of His great devotees.

During the course of the existence of the cosmic manifestation, the chronology of history is created, recording the activities of the living entities. People in general have a tendency to learn the history and narrations of different men and times, but due to a lack of knowledge in the science of Godhead, they are not apt to study the history of the incarnations of the Personality of Godhead. It should always be remembered that the material creation is created for the salvation of the conditioned souls. The merciful Lord, out of His causeless mercy, descends to various planets in the material world and acts for the salvation of the conditioned souls. That makes the history and narrations worth reading. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam offers such transcendental topics of the Lord in relationship with great devotees. Therefore the topics of the devotees and the Lord are to be given respectful aural reception.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Īśa-kathā refers to descriptions of the Lord’s avatāras and their devotees, filled with various stories.
Commentary

Īśa-kathā refers to the stories concerning the avatāras of the Lord and the devotees of the avatāras (asya anuvartinām). The avatāras and their devotees should be heard about and glorified. Thus in the material world (sthiti) the devotional aṅgas of hearing and chanting of the sādhaka devotees are described.

The science of God describes His incarnations and the activities of His great devotees. Material creation exists so conditioned souls may be saved; the histories worth knowing are the ones rooted in salvation, not just chronology.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'history' am I drinking in — secular news or the saving acts of God and devotees?
  • Which devotee's story might fund my own salvation if I really took it in?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.6

↗
निरोधोऽस्यानुशयनमात्मन: सह शक्तिभि: । मुक्तिर्हित्वान्यथारूपं स्वरूपेण व्यवस्थिति: ॥ ६ ॥
nirodho ’syānuśayanam
[nirodho ’syaanushayanam]
ātmanaḥ saha śaktibhiḥ
[aatmanah saha shaktibhih]
muktir hitvānyathā rūpaṁ
[muktir hitvaanyathaa roopam]
sva-rūpeṇa vyavasthitiḥ
[sva-roopena vyavasthitih]
nirodhaḥ — the winding up of the cosmic manifestation asya — of His anuśayanam — the lying down of the puruṣa incarnation Mahā-Viṣṇu in mystic slumber ātmanaḥ — of the living entities saha — along with śaktibhiḥ — with the energies muktiḥ — liberation hitvā — giving up anyathā — otherwise rūpam — form sva-rūpeṇa — in constitutional form vyavasthitiḥ — permanent situation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nirodho ’syānuśayanam
nirodhaḥ
the winding up of the cosmic manifestation
ātmanaḥ saha śaktibhiḥ
asya
of His
muktir hitvānyathā rūpaṁ
anuśayanam
the lying down of the puruṣa incarnation Mahā-Viṣṇu in mystic slumber
ātmanaḥ
of the living entities
saha
along with
śaktibhiḥ
with the energies
muktiḥ
liberation
sva-rūpeṇa vyavasthitiḥ
hitvā
giving up
anyathā
otherwise
rūpam
form
sva-rūpeṇa
in constitutional form
vyavasthitiḥ
permanent situation.
The merging of the living entity, along with his conditional living tendency, with the mystic lying down of the Mahā-Viṣṇu is called the winding up of the cosmic manifestation. Liberation is the permanent situation of the form of the living entity after he gives up the changeable gross and subtle material bodies.

As we have discussed several times, there are two types of living entities. Most of them are ever liberated, or nitya-muktas, while some of them are ever conditioned. The ever-conditioned souls are apt to develop a mentality of lording over the material nature, and therefore the material cosmic creation is manifested to give the ever-conditioned souls two kinds of facilities. One facility is that the conditioned soul can act according to his tendency to lord it over the cosmic manifestation, and the other facility gives the conditioned soul a chance to come back to Godhead. So after the winding up of the cosmic manifestation, most of the conditioned souls merge into the existence of the Mahā-Viṣṇu Personality of Godhead, lying in His mystic slumber, to be created again in the next creation. But some of the conditioned souls, who follow the transcendental sound in the form of Vedic literatures and are thus able to go back to Godhead, attain spiritual and original bodies after quitting the conditional gross and subtle material bodies. The material conditional bodies develop out of the living entities’ forgetfulness of their relationship with Godhead, and during the course of the cosmic manifestation, the conditioned souls are given a chance to revive their original status of life with the help of revealed scriptures, so mercifully compiled by the Lord in His different incarnations. Reading or hearing of such transcendental literatures helps one become liberated even in the conditional state of material existence. All the Vedic literatures aim at devotional service to the Personality of Godhead, and as soon as one is fixed upon this point, he at once becomes liberated from conditional life. The material gross and subtle forms are simply due to the conditioned soul’s ignorance and as soon as he is fixed in the devotional service of the Lord, he becomes eligible to be freed from the conditioned state. This devotional service is transcendental attraction for the Supreme on account of His being the source of all pleasing humors. Everyone is after some pleasure of humor for enjoyment, but does not know the supreme source of all attraction ( raso vai saḥ rasaṁ hy evāyaṁ labdhvānandī bhavati ). The Vedic hymns inform everyone about the supreme source of all pleasure: the unlimited fountainhead of all pleasure is the Personality of Godhead. And one who is fortunate enough to get this information through transcendental literatures like Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam becomes permanently liberated to occupy his proper place in the kingdom of God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nirodha refers to the merging of the jīva along with his material identity into the Lord at the time of final devastation of the universe. Mukti means the jīva’s attainment of his form as pure ātmā or as an associate of the Lord after giving up gross and subtle material bodies.
Commentary

Nirodha refers to the sleeping (merging) of jīva along with his subtle coverings following after the Lord’s sleep. This refers to the jīva’s merging into the Lord after the protection period (sthiti) is completed. Mukti refers to the condition in which the jīva remains in his pure form or in the form of an associate of the Lord in some cases, after giving up the gross and subtle bodies of māyā (anyathā-rūpam). Thus the nine topics related to the jīva, starting with his attaining a material body, have been described.

Cosmic annihilation merges conditioned beings back into Mahā-Viṣṇu — they get a rest, then are sent out again. Liberation is the permanent settling of the soul's spiritual form after gross and subtle bodies are dropped for good.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I content with cycles of withdrawal and re-emergence, or do I want the permanent settling?
  • What in me is still 'lording' enough to keep the cycle running?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.7

↗
आभासश्च निरोधश्च यतोऽस्त्यध्यवसीयते । स आश्रय: परं ब्रह्म परमात्मेति शब्द्यते ॥ ७ ॥
ābhāsaś ca nirodhaś ca
[aabhaasash cha nirodhash cha]
yato ’sty adhyavasīyate
[yato ’sty adhyavaseeyate]
sa āśrayaḥ paraṁ brahma
[sa aashrayah param brahma]
paramātmeti śabdyate
[paramaatmeti shabdyate]
ābhāsaḥ — the cosmic manifestation ca — and nirodhaḥ — and its winding up ca — also yataḥ — from the source asti — is adhyavasīyate — become manifested saḥ — He āśrayaḥ — reservoir param — the Supreme brahma — Being paramātmā — the Supersoul iti — thus śabdyate — called.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ābhāsaś ca nirodhaś ca
ābhāsaḥ
the cosmic manifestation
ca
and
nirodhaḥ
and its winding up
ca
also
yato ’sty adhyavasīyate
yataḥ
from the source
asti
is
adhyavasīyate
become manifested
sa āśrayaḥ paraṁ brahma
saḥ
He
āśrayaḥ
reservoir
param
the Supreme
brahma
Being
paramātmeti śabdyate
paramātmā
the Supersoul
iti
thus
śabdyate
called.
The supreme one who is celebrated as the Supreme Being or the Supreme Soul is the supreme source of the cosmic manifestation as well as its reservoir and winding up. Thus He is the Supreme Fountainhead, the Absolute Truth.

Synonyms for the supreme source of all energies, as explained in the very beginning of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, are janmādy asya yataḥ, vadanti tat tattva-vidas tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam/ brahmeti paramātmeti bhagavān iti śabdyate, called Parambrahma, Paramātmā or Bhagavān. The word iti used here in this verse completes the synonyms and thus indicates Bhagavān. This will be further explained in the later verses, but this Bhagavān ultimately means Lord Kṛṣṇa because the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam has already accepted the Supreme Personality of Godhead as Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam. The original source of all energies, or the summum bonum, is the Absolute Truth, which is called Parambrahma, etc., and Bhagavān is the last word of the Absolute Truth. But even with the synonyms for Bhagavān, such as Nārāyaṇa, Viṣṇu and Puruṣa, the last word is Kṛṣṇa, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā: ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate, etc. Besides that, the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the representation of Lord Kṛṣṇa as a sound incarnation of the Lord.

kṛṣṇe sva-dhāmopagate dharma-jñānādibhiḥ saha kalau naṣṭa-dṛśām eṣaḥ purāṇārko ’dhunoditaḥ

( Bhāg. 1.3.43 )

Thus by general conclusion Lord Kṛṣṇa is the ultimate source of all energies, and the word kṛṣṇa means that. And to explain Kṛṣṇa or the science of Kṛṣṇa, the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam has been prepared. In the First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam this truth is indicated in the questions and answers by Sūta Gosvāmī and great sages like Śaunaka, and in the First and Second Chapters of the canto this is explained. In the Third Chapter this subject is more explicit, and in the Fourth Chapter even more explicit. In the Second Canto the Absolute Truth as the Personality of Godhead is further emphasized, and the indication is the Supreme Lord, Kṛṣṇa. The summary of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in four verses, as we have already discussed, is succinct. This Supreme Personality of Godhead in the ultimate issue is confirmed by Brahmā in his Brahma-saṁhitā as īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ. So it is concluded in the Third Canto of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The complete subject matter is elaborately explained in the Tenth and Eleventh Cantos of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. In the matter of the changes of the Manus or manvantaras, such as the Svāyambhuva- manvantara and Cākṣuṣa- manvantara, as they are discussed in the Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Cantos of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Lord Kṛṣṇa is indicated. In the Eighth Canto the Vaivasvata- manvantara explains the same subject indirectly, and in the Ninth Canto the same purport is there. In the Twelfth Canto the same is further explained, specifically regarding the different incarnations of the Lord. Thus it is concluded by studying the complete Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam that Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the ultimate summum bonum, or the ultimate source of all energy. And according to the grades of worshipers, the indications of the nomenclature may be differently explained as Nārāyaṇa, Brahmā, Paramātmā, etc.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The āśraya, Bhagavān, from whom arise creation, sub-creation, protection, mercy, karma, dharma of the kings, the appearance of avatāras, destruction and liberation is also called Paramātmā and brahman.
Commentary

Having described the nature of the nine topics by indicating their subject, the Supreme Lord is described as the one shelter of these in this verse. That by which creation (ābhāsaḥ), visarga, sthiti, poṣaṇa, ūti, manvantara, īśa-kathā (ca), destruction (nirodhaḥ) and mukti (ca) are accomplished is called the āśraya, Bhagavān or Nārāyaṇa, since he looks upon the creation, maintenance and destruction. According to the method of worship he is described in different ways. Thus he is called param brahma by the jñānīs and Paramātmā by the yogīs.

Related verses
The Supreme Being — Parambrahma, Paramātmā, Bhagavān — is the source, reservoir, and end of the cosmic manifestation. Three names point to one Absolute Truth, who finally is Kṛṣṇa. The summum bonum is a Person, not a principle.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I lean toward Brahman, Paramātmā, or Bhagavān realization — and what am I missing in the others?
  • What does it ask of me to accept Bhagavān as the deepest level of the same Truth?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.8

↗
योऽध्यात्मिकोऽयं पुरुष: सोऽसावेवाधिदैविक: । यस्तत्रोभयविच्छेद: पुरुषो ह्याधिभौतिक: ॥ ८ ॥
yo ’dhyātmiko ’yaṁ puruṣaḥ
[yo ’dhyaatmiko ’yam purushah]
so ’sāv evādhidaivikaḥ
[so ’saav evaadhidaivikah]
yas tatrobhaya-vicchedaḥ
[yas tatrobhaya-vichchedah]
puruṣo hy ādhibhautikaḥ
[purusho hy aadhibhautikah]
yaḥ — one who adhyātmikaḥ — is possessed of the sense organs ayam — this puruṣaḥ — personality saḥ — he asau — that eva — also adhidaivikaḥ — controlling deity yaḥ — that which tatra — there ubhaya — of both vicchedaḥ — separation puruṣaḥ — person hi — for ādhibhautikaḥ — the visible body or the embodied living entity.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yo ’dhyātmiko ’yaṁ puruṣaḥ
yaḥ
one who
so ’sāv evādhidaivikaḥ
adhyātmikaḥ
is possessed of the sense organs
yas tatrobhaya-vicchedaḥ
ayam
this
puruṣo hy ādhibhautikaḥ
puruṣaḥ
personality
saḥ
he
asau
that
eva
also
adhidaivikaḥ
controlling deity
yaḥ
that which
tatra
there
ubhaya
of both
vicchedaḥ
separation
puruṣaḥ
person
hi
for
ādhibhautikaḥ
the visible body or the embodied living entity.
The individual person possessing different instruments of senses is called the adhyātmic person, and the individual controlling deity of the senses is called adhidaivic. The embodiment seen on the eyeballs is called the adhibhautic person.

The supreme controlling summum bonum is the Personality of Godhead in His plenary portion of Paramātmā, or the Supersoul manifestation. In the Bhagavad-gītā (10.42) it is said:

athavā bahunaitena kiṁ jñātena tavārjuna viṣṭabhyāham idaṁ kṛtsnam ekāṁśena sthito jagat

All the controlling deities like Viṣṇu, Brahmā and Śiva are different manifestations of the Paramātmā feature of the Supreme Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who exhibits himself in such manners by entering into each and every universe generated from Him. But still apparently there are divisions of the controller and controlled. For example, in the food-controlling department the controller of food is a person made of the same ingredients as the person who is controlled. Similarly, each and every individual in the material world is controlled by the higher demigods. For example, we have our senses, but the senses are controlled by superior controlling deities. We cannot see without light, and the supreme controller of light is the sun. The sun-god is in the sun planet, and we, the individual human beings or any other being on this earth, are all controlled by the sun-god as far as our eyes are concerned. Similarly, all the senses we have are controlled by the superior demigods, who are also as much living entities as we are, but one is empowered while the other is controlled. The controlled living entity is called the adhyātmic person, and the controller is called the adhidaivic person. All these positions in the material world are due to different fruitive activities. Any individual living being can become the sun-god or even Brahmā or any other god in the upper planetary system by a higher grade of pious work, and similarly one becomes controlled by the higher demigods by lower grades of fruitive activities. So every individual living entity is subject to the supreme control of the Paramātmā, who puts everyone in different positions of the controller and the controlled.

That which distinguishes the controller and controlled, i.e., the material body, is called the adhibhautic puruṣa. The body is sometimes called puruṣa, as confirmed in the Vedas in the following hymn: sa vā eṣa puruṣo ’nna-rasamayaḥ. This body is called the anna-rasa embodiment. This body depends on food. The living entity which is embodied does not eat anything, however, because the owner is spirit in essence. The material body requires replacement of matter for the wearing and tearing of the mechanical body. Therefore the distinction between the individual living entity and controlling planetary deities is in the anna-rasamaya body. The sun may have a gigantic body, and the man may have a smaller body, but all these visible bodies are made of matter; nonetheless, the sun-god and the individual person, who are related as the controller and the controlled, are the same spiritual parts and parcels of the Supreme Being, and it is the Supreme Being who places different parts and parcels in different positions. And thus the conclusion is that the Supreme Person is the shelter of all.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The covering on the jīva known as the subtle sense organ is not different from the presiding deities of the senses. The division of subtle sense organ and sense deity is not different from the gross organ of the material body.
Commentary

The Lord has said viṣṭabhyāham idaṁ kṛtsnam ekāṁśena sthito jagat: I am situated by my portion everywhere in this world. (BG 10.42) Two verses now show the difference between this āśraya form situated as antaryāmī within all bodies and the individual jīvas. The covering known as the subtle sense organ (adhyātmikaḥ puruṣaḥ) is the controlling deity of the sense organ (adhidaivikaḥ), such as the sun deity who controls the eye, since both the eye and the presiding deity of the eye are aṁśas of the sun deity. Among all substances, that portion which has divisions of sense and sense deity (ubhaya) is not different from the covering on the jīva known as the visible organ. The gross organ and sense objects (tan-mātrās) are called the gross body. The word puruṣa is used in all these cases to indicate that these are coverings on the jīva. This meaning of puruṣa is found in śruti statements such as sa vā eṣa puruṣo ’nna-rasa-mayaḥ: the puruṣa is composed of food and taste. (Taittirīya Upaniṣad 2.1)

Related verses
Three perspectives on every act: the individual with senses (adhyātmic), the controlling deity of those senses (adhidaivic), and the embodiment on the eyeball (adhibhautic). All three are arranged by the Paramātmā. Even seeing has a hierarchy.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I act as if my senses are mine alone, ignoring their deities and objects?
  • How does a three-level view of my own action change what I credit to myself?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.9

↗
एकमेकतराभावे यदा नोपलभामहे । त्रितयं तत्र यो वेद स आत्मा स्वाश्रयाश्रय: ॥ ९ ॥
ekam ekatarābhāve
[ekam ekataraabhaave]
yadā nopalabhāmahe
[yadaa nopalabhaamahe]
tritayaṁ tatra yo veda
[tritayam tatra yo veda]
sa ātmā svāśrayāśrayaḥ
[sa aatmaa svaashrayaashrayah]
ekam — one ekatara — another abhāve — in the absence of yadā — because na — does not upalabhāmahe — perceptible tritayam — in three stages tatra — there yaḥ — the one veda — who knows saḥ — he ātmā — the Supersoul sva — own āśraya — shelter āśrayaḥ — of the shelter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ekam ekatarābhāve
ekam
one
ekatara
another
abhāve
in the absence of
yadā nopalabhāmahe
yadā
because
na
does not
upalabhāmahe
perceptible
tritayaṁ tatra yo veda
tritayam
in three stages
tatra
there
sa ātmā svāśrayāśrayaḥ
yaḥ
the one
veda
who knows
saḥ
he
ātmā
the Supersoul
sva
own
āśraya
shelter
āśrayaḥ
of the shelter.
All three of the above-mentioned stages of different living entities are interdependent. In the absence of one, another is not understood. But the Supreme Being who sees every one of them as the shelter of the shelter is independent of all, and therefore He is the supreme shelter.

There are innumerable living entities, one dependent on the other in the relationship of the controlled and the controller. But without the medium of perception, no one can know or understand who is the controlled and who is the controller. For example, the sun controls the power of our vision, we can see the sun because the sun has its body, and the sunlight is useful only because we have eyes. Without our having eyes, the sunlight is useless, and without sunlight the eyes are useless. Thus they are interdependent, and none of them is independent. Therefore the natural question arises concerning who made them interdependent. The one who has made such a relationship of interdependence must be ultimately completely independent. As stated in the beginning of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the ultimate source of all interdependent objectives is the complete independent subject. This ultimate source of all interdependence is the Supreme Truth or Paramātmā, the Supersoul, who is not dependent on anything else. He is svāśrayāśrayaḥ. He is only dependent on His self, and thus He is the supreme shelter of everything. Although Paramātmā and Brahman are subordinate to Bhagavān, because Bhagavān is Puruṣottama or the Superperson, He is the source of the Supersoul also. In the Bhagavad-gītā (15.18) Lord Kṛṣṇa says that He is the Puruṣottama and the source of everything, and thus it is concluded that Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the ultimate source and shelter of all entities, including the Supersoul and Supreme Brahman. Even accepting that there is no difference between the Supersoul and the individual soul, the individual soul is dependent on the Supersoul for being liberated from the illusion of material energy. The individual is under the clutches of illusory energy, and therefore although qualitatively one with the Supersoul, he is under the illusion of identifying himself with matter. And to get out of this illusory conception of factual life, the individual soul has to depend on the Supersoul to be recognized as one with Him. In that sense also the Supersoul is the supreme shelter. And there is no doubt about it.

The individual living entity, the jīva, is always dependent on the Supersoul, Paramātmā, because the individual soul forgets his spiritual identity whereas the Supersoul, Paramātmā, does not forget His transcendental position. In the Bhagavad-gītā these separate positions of the jīva-ātmā and the Paramātmā are specifically mentioned. In the Fourth Chapter, Arjuna, the jīva soul, is represented as forgetful of his many, many previous births, but the Lord, the Supersoul, is not forgetful. The Lord even remembers when He taught the Bhagavad-gītā to the sun-god some billions of years before. The Lord can remember such millions and billions of years, as stated in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.26) as follows:

vedāhaṁ samatītāni vartamānāni cārjuna bhaviṣyāṇi ca bhūtāni māṁ tu veda na kaścana

The Lord in His eternal blissful body of knowledge is fully aware of all that happened in the past, that which is going on at the present and also what will happen in the future. But in spite of His being the shelter of both the Paramātmā and Brahman, persons with a poor fund of knowledge are unable to understand Him as He is.

The propaganda of the identity of cosmic consciousness with the consciousness of the individual living entities is completely misleading because even such a person or individual soul as Arjuna could not remember his past deeds, although he is always with the Lord. And what can the tiny ordinary man, falsely claiming to be one with the cosmic consciousness, know about his past, present and future?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Since we cannot perceive one item in absence of one of the other items (subtle sense, sense deity and gross form), he who is independent of these three, is the ātmā. But the shelter of the ātmā is the Paramātmā.
Commentary

Because of the interdependence of the three items in order for them to function, they are shown to be different from the ātmā. Without the gross organ on the body, the subtle sense which is known to function by performing perception cannot function. Without the subtle sense organ, the presiding deity of the sense, whose presence is inferred from action of that sense, cannot function. Without the presiding deity of the sense, the subtle sense organ cannot operate, and without the subtle sense organ, the gross organ cannot operate. Since, in the absence of one of the three, the others cannot be ascertained, he who knows these three, who is not dependent on them, is the jīva. It is said:

deho ’savo ’kṣā manavo bhūta-mātrām ātmānam anyaṁ ca viduḥ paraṁ yat | sarvaṁ pumān veda guṇāṁś ca taj-jño na veda sarva-jñam anantam īḍe ||

The body, life airs, senses, internal senses, gross elements and sense objects do not know themselves or other things or the jīva. The jīva knows all of these items and the guṇas which cause them. He also knows Paramātmā, but does not know the omniscient, unlimited Lord. I worship that Lord with infinite qualities. SB 6.4.25

Sarva refers to these three coverings on the jīva. The jīva (pumān) knows these three. It is also said:

jāgrat-svapna-suṣuptaṁ ca guṇato buddhi-vṛttayaḥ | tāsāṁ vilakṣaṇo jīvaḥ sākṣitvena vivakṣitaḥ ||

Waking, sleeping and deep sleep, the three functions of the intelligence, are caused by the three guṇas. The jīva is ascertained to be different from these three states since it is the witness of them. SB 11.13.27

What is the nature of the jīva? The jīva takes shelter of Paramātmā (svāśraya), whose shelter is himself. The meaning is this. The jīva is the shelter of the three items -- the subtle sense, the sense deity and the gross sense in the body which are mutually dependent. The shelter of the jīva is the Paramātmā. Paramātmā is the shelter of Paramātmā. Thus Paramātmā is the ultimate shelter. Since Kṛṣṇa says that by his aṁśa he pervades the worlds, it should be understood that Kṛṣṇa is the shelter of Paramātmā. Thus Kṛṣṇa is the chief shelter. Paramātmā as his aṁśa is also called the shelter, and brahman being his impersonal form is also called a shelter. Thus the one shelter is seen in three different forms according to the type of worshipper.

Related verses
Controller, controlled, and instrument are interdependent — none of them is independent. Only the Supreme Being is independent and is the shelter of every shelter. Recognize the One who arranged this interdependence.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse partial dependencies for ultimate ones?
  • Whom am I treating as the shelter of shelters in my actual decisions?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.10

↗
पुरुषोऽण्डं विनिर्भिद्य यदासौ स विनिर्गत: । आत्मनोऽयनमन्विच्छन्नपोऽस्राक्षीच्छुचि: शुची: ॥ १० ॥
puruṣo ’ṇḍaṁ vinirbhidya
[purusho ’ndam vinirbhidya]
yadāsau sa vinirgataḥ
[yadaasau sa vinirgatah]
ātmano ’yanam anvicchann
[aatmano ’yanam anvichchann]
apo ’srākṣīc chuciḥ śucīḥ
[apo ’sraaksheech chuchih shucheeh]
puruṣaḥ — the Supreme Person, Paramātmā aṇḍam — the universes vinirbhidya — making them each separately situated yadā — when asau — the same saḥ — He (the Lord) vinirgataḥ — came out ātmanaḥ — of Himself ayanam — lying in place anvicchan — desiring apaḥ — water asrākṣīt — created śuciḥ — the most pure śucīḥ — transcendental.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
puruṣo ’ṇḍaṁ vinirbhidya
puruṣaḥ
the Supreme Person, Paramātmā
yadāsau sa vinirgataḥ
ātmano ’yanam anvicchann
aṇḍam
the universes
vinirbhidya
making them each separately situated
yadā
when
asau
the same
saḥ
He (the Lord)
vinirgataḥ
came out
ātmanaḥ
of Himself
ayanam
lying in place
anvicchan
desiring
apo ’srākṣīc chuciḥ śucīḥ
apaḥ
water
asrākṣīt
created
śuciḥ
the most pure
śucīḥ
transcendental.
After separating the different universes, the gigantic universal form of the Lord [Mahā-Viṣṇu], which came out of the Causal Ocean, the place of appearance for the first puruṣa-avatāra, entered into each of the separate universes, desiring to lie on the created transcendental water [Garbhodaka].

After analysis of the living entities and the Supreme Lord, Paramātmā, the independent source of all other living beings, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī is now presenting the prime necessity for devotional service to the Lord, which is the only occupational business of all living entities. The Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and all His plenary portions and extensions of plenary portions are nondifferent from one another, and thus the supreme independence is in each and every one of them. In order to prove this, Śukadeva Gosvāmī (as promised to King Parīkṣit) describes herein the independence of the puruṣa-avatāra Personality of Godhead, even in the sphere of the material creation. Such activities of the Lord are also transcendental, and therefore they are also līlā, or pastimes, of the Absolute Lord. Such pastimes of the Lord are very conducive to the hearers for self-realization in the field of devotional service. Some may argue, “Then why not relish the transcendental līlā of the Lord as exhibited in the land of Mathurā and Vṛndāvana, which are sweeter than anything in the world?” Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura replies that the pastimes of the Lord in Vṛndāvana are meant to be relished by advanced devotees of the Lord. Neophyte devotees will misunderstand such supreme transcendental activities of the Lord, and therefore the Lord’s pastimes in the material sphere related to creation, maintenance and destruction are verily relishable by the prākṛta, or mundane devotees of the Lord. As the yoga system mainly based on bodily exercises is meant for the person who is too much attached to the bodily conception of existence, similarly the Lord’s pastimes related to the creation and destruction of the material world are for those who are too materially attached. For such mundane creatures the functions of the body and the functions of the cosmic world through physical laws in relationship with the Lord are also therefore included in understanding of the lawmaker, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The scientists explain the material functions by so many technological terms of material law, but such blind scientists forget the lawmaker. The Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam points out the lawmaker. One should not be amazed by the mechanical arrangement of the complicated engine or dynamo, but one should praise the engineer who creates such a wonderful working machine. That is the difference between the devotee and the nondevotee. Devotees are always full with praising the Lord, who directs the physical laws. In the Bhagavad-gītā (9.10) the direction of the Lord upon the material nature is described as follows:

mayādhyakṣeṇa prakṛtiḥ sūyate sacarācaram hetunānena kaunteya jagad viparivartate

“The material nature full of physical laws is one of My different energies; therefore it is neither independent nor blind. Because I am transcendentally all-powerful, simply by My glancing over material nature, the physical laws of nature work so wonderfully. The actions and reactions of the physical laws work on that account, and thus the material world is created, maintained and annihilated again and again.”

Men with a poor fund of knowledge, however, become astonished by studying the physical laws both within the construction of the individual body and within the cosmic manifestation, and foolishly they decry the existence of God, taking it for granted that the physical laws are independent, without any metaphysical control. The Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) replies to this foolishness in the following words:

avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam paraṁ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram

“The foolish men [ mūḍhāḥ ] do not know the Personality of Godhead in His eternal form of bliss and knowledge.” The foolish man thinks of the transcendental body of the Lord as something like his own, and therefore he cannot think of the unlimited controlling power of the Lord, who is not visible in the acting of the physical laws. The Lord is, however, visible to the naked eyes of people in general when He descends Himself by His own personal potency. Lord Kṛṣṇa incarnated Himself as He is and played very wonderful parts as the Lord Himself, and the Bhagavad-gītā concerns such wonderful actions and knowledge. Yet foolish men will not accept Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Lord. Generally they consider the infinitesimal and infinite features of the Lord because they themselves are unable to become either the infinitesimal or the infinite, but one should know that the infinite and infinitesimal sizes of the Lord are not His highest glories. The most wonderful manifestation of the Lord’s power is exhibited when the infinite Lord becomes visible to our eyes as one of us. Yet His activities are different from those of the finite beings. Lifting a mountain at the age of seven years and marrying sixteen thousand wives in the prime of His youth are some of the examples of His infinite energy, but the mūḍhas, after seeing them or hearing about them, decry them as legendary and take the Lord as one of them. They cannot understand that the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, although in the form of a human being by His own potency, is still the Supreme Lord with full potency as the supreme controller.

When, however, the mūḍhas give submissive and aural reception to the messages of the Lord as in the Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā or in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam through the channel of disciplic succession, such mūḍhas also become devotees of the Lord by the grace of His pure devotees. And for this reason only, either in the Bhagavad-gītā or in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the pastimes of the Lord in the material world are delineated for the benefit of those men with a poor fund of knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the pure puruṣa, separating himself from the universe, remained outside, desiring a place to lie down in the universe, he created the pure waters of the Garbhodaka.
Commentary

The difference between the jīva and the Lord has been established through the ten characteristics of a mahā-purāṇa and thus bhakti to the Lord has been hinted as the deliverance of the jīva from the world. Now Śukadeva speaks in order to explain a topic he promised with yad utāhaṁ tvayā pṛṣṭo vairājāt puruṣādidam | yathāsīt tad-upākhyā: I will explain what you asked me concerning how this universe arose from the universal form. [Note: Parīkṣit asks the question in SB 2.8.11.] (SB 2.9.46)

“Why do you always speak about the universal form and the self? Why is there so little sweet discussion about the qualities and forms of the līlāvatāras?”

What you observe is true. To whom should topics about the līlāvatāras be taught with relish? Those how have perfected bhakti or the nitya-siddhas constantly play spontaneously in the sweet ocean of Lord’s beauty and pastimes. But those who are sleeping on the bed of bliss of sense pleasure, and those who have fainted in the waves of suffering arising from karma, cannot be woken up. How can pastimes of the Lord be taught to them? This crest jewel of Purāṇas, being most merciful, thinking of how to give instruction to make them into sādhaka-bhaktas, constantly attempts by some trick or other, to wake them up. Just as a limb burned by fire is given relief by fire and a person haunted by a ghost is revived by a ghost mantra, so jīvas’ absorption in the sleep of māyā can be broken by topics concerning māyā. It has been said:

māyāṁ varṇayato ’muṣya īśvarasyānumodataḥ | śṛṇvataḥ śraddhayā nityaṁ māyayātmā na muhyati ||

If the jīva constantly describes māyā in relation to the Lord, remembers māyā or hears about māyā with proper faith, he will not be bewildered by māyā. SB 2.7.53

But even though by the shower of nectar of pastimes of the Lord obtained by the mercy of the devotee, the person sleeping in the happiness of māyā or fainting in the suffering of karmas wakes up, becomes drenched, revitalized, dances and rejoices blissfully, only those who obtain that great mercy become successful, and not others.

The low jīvas, desiring to cross the material world and have developed determination to take shelter of the lotus feet of guru, can be delivered by constantly hearing about the self. For this reasons there is repeated discussion of the self. Those who are faithful devotees of the Lord will relish the nectar of the whole Bhāgavatam.

This scripture does not only speak about Bhagavān, though he is the main topic. It also speaks about the impersonal aspect of the Lord – brahman -- and his portion, Paramātmā. It has been said at the beginning of this work brahmeti paramātmeti bhagavān iti śabdyate (SB 1.2.11) Thus, repeated discussion of the self is suitable for worshippers of brahman and Paramātmā. By this means, being most generous, Bhāgavatam produces bhakti in even the worshippers of brahman and Paramātmā. Bhakti even appears in those who have reached perfection in brahman and Paramātmā. This is shown in the verse ātmārāmāś ca munayaḥ. (SB 1.7.10) Those persons, their sādhana, and the result they achieve are not rejected by the pure devotees, but looked upon with sympathy.

Kṛṣṇa who is completely full of sweetness in his form, qualities and pastimes, and possesses dharma, jñāna, bala and aiśvarya, since he contains all avatāras such as Matsya and Kūrma and the aspects of brahman and paramātmā as well, is worshipped by all types of devotees. This scripture, being non-different from Kṛṣṇa’s svarūpa, thus reveals Kṛṣṇa as the source of all avatāras, brahman and Paramātmā. It reveals his qualities, pastimes, sweetness and powers, the method to attain him, sādhana-bhakti, the goal prema-bhakti, as well as all principles such as dharma, jñāna, yoga and vairāgya. Thus everything is consistent.

When the Lord, who glances over prakṛti, having created the universe, distinguishing it from himself, situated himself outside, he desired a sleeping place (ayaṇam) for himself in the universe (tasmin), and created the Garbhodaka. The Lord, being naturally pure (śuciḥ), created water which was pure (śucīh). This distinguishes it from the milk ocean.

Related verses
After separating each universe, Mahā-Viṣṇu enters each individually as the puruṣa-avatāra, desiring to lie on transcendental water. Even the Lord's act of creation is intimate — He enters each separate world personally.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I picture God as far away, or as personally entered into my world?
  • How does His intimate entry into each universe change how I treat 'this one'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.11

↗
तास्ववात्सीत् स्वसृष्टासु सहस्रंपरिवत्सरान् । तेन नारायणो नाम यदाप: पुरुषोद्भवा: ॥ ११ ॥
tāsv avātsīt sva-sṛṣṭāsu
[taasv avaatseet sva-srishtaasu]
sahasraṁ parivatsarān
[sahasram parivatsaraan]
tena nārāyaṇo nāma
[tena naaraayano naama]
yad āpaḥ puruṣodbhavāḥ
[yad aapah purushodbhavaah]
tāsu — in that avātsīt — resided sva — own sṛṣṭāsu — in the matter of creation sahasram — one thousand parivatsarān — years of His measurement tena — for that reason nārāyaṇaḥ — the Personality of Godhead named Nārāyaṇa nāma — name yat — because āpaḥ — water puruṣa-udbhavāḥ — emanated from the Supreme Person.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāsv avātsīt sva-sṛṣṭāsu
tāsu
in that
avātsīt
resided
sva
own
sṛṣṭāsu
in the matter of creation
sahasraṁ parivatsarān
sahasram
one thousand
parivatsarān
years of His measurement
tena nārāyaṇo nāma
tena
for that reason
nārāyaṇaḥ
the Personality of Godhead named Nārāyaṇa
nāma
name
yad āpaḥ puruṣodbhavāḥ
yat
because
āpaḥ
water
puruṣa-udbhavāḥ
emanated from the Supreme Person.
That Supreme Person is not impersonal and therefore is distinctively a nara, or person. Therefore the transcendental water created from the Supreme Nara is known as nāra. And because He lies down on that water, He is known as Nārāyaṇa.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He dwelled from many years in that water created from himself. Because of that he is called Nārāyaṇa, since the waters (nārā) arose from the puruṣa (nara).
Commentary

By deriving the name Nārāyaṇa, his dwelling in the water becomes clear. By residing (tena) in that water he got the name Nārāyaṇa because the waters arose from the puruṣa. Nara means the puruṣa. Nāra is that which arises from him. He whose resting place (ayana) is that water (nāra) is called Nārāyaṇa. It is said:

āpo nārā iti proktā āpo vai nara-sūnavaḥ | ayanaṁ tasya tāḥ pūrvaṁ tena nārāyaṇaḥ smṛtaḥ ||

The word āpaḥ and nārā are synonymous for “water” since the waters are considered the sons of Nara, the primeval male or Mahā-viṣṇu. [Note: Nāra means the offspring of Nara. ] Since these waters act as the bed (ayana) of Mahā-viṣṇu from the ancient past, he is called Nārāyaṇa. Viṣṇu Purāṇa 1.4.6

The Supreme Person is not impersonal — nara means Person. The water sprung from Him is nāra; lying on it makes Him Nārāyaṇa. Even the etymology insists He is a Person. Don't let abstract language wash away the Person.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has my language about God become impersonal even though my heart wants a Person?
  • What name of His most reminds me He is a Person, not a force?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.12

↗
द्रव्यं कर्म च कालश्च स्वभावो जीव एव च । यदनुग्रहत: सन्ति न सन्ति यदुपेक्षया ॥ १२ ॥
dravyaṁ karma ca kālaś ca
[dravyam karma cha kaalash cha]
svabhāvo jīva eva ca
[svabhaavo jeeva eva cha]
yad-anugrahataḥ santi
[yad-anugrahatah santi]
na santi yad-upekṣayā
[na santi yad-upekshayaa]
dravyam — physical elements karma — action ca — and kālaḥ — time ca — also sva-bhāvaḥ jīvaḥ — the living entities eva — certainly ca — also yat — whose anugrahataḥ — by the mercy of santi — exist na — does not santi — exist yat-upekṣayā — by negligence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dravyaṁ karma ca kālaś ca
dravyam
physical elements
karma
action
ca
and
kālaḥ
time
ca
also
svabhāvo jīva eva ca
sva-bhāvaḥ jīvaḥ
the living entities
eva
certainly
ca
also
yad-anugrahataḥ santi
yat
whose
anugrahataḥ
by the mercy of
santi
exist
na santi yad-upekṣayā
na
does not
santi
exist
yat-upekṣayā
by negligence.
One should definitely know that all material ingredients, activities, time and modes, and the living entities who are meant to enjoy them all, exist by His mercy only, and as soon as He does not care for them, everything becomes nonexistent.

The living entities are the enjoyers of the material ingredients, time, modes, etc., because they want to lord it over the material nature. The Lord is the supreme enjoyer, and the living entities are meant to assist the Lord in His enjoyment and thus participate in the transcendental enjoyment of everyone. The enjoyer and the enjoyed both participate in enjoyment, but, deluded by the illusory energy, the living entities want to become the enjoyer like the Lord, although they are not meant for such enjoyment. The jīvas, the living entities, are mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā as the Lord’s superior nature, or parā prakṛti, and so also it is mentioned in the Viṣṇu Purāṇa. Therefore the living entities are never the puruṣas, or the factual enjoyers. As such, the spirit of enjoyment by the living entity in the material world is false. In the spiritual world the living entities are pure in nature, and therefore they are associates in the enjoyment of the Supreme Lord. In the material world the spirit of enjoyment of the living entities by dint of their own actions ( karma ) gradually fades by the laws of nature, and thus the illusory energy dictates in the ears of the conditioned souls that they should become one with the Lord. This is the last snare of the illusory energy. When the last illusion is also cleared off by the mercy of the Lord, the living entity again becomes reinstated in his original position and thus becomes actually liberated. For this attainment of liberation from the material clutches, the Lord creates the material world, maintains it for some time (one thousand years of His measurement, as stated in the previous verse), and then again annihilates it by His will. The living entities are therefore completely dependent on the mercy of the Lord, and all their so-called enjoyments by scientific improvement are crushed into dust when the Lord desires.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By connection with the Lord, matter, karma, time, svabhāvaand the totality of jīvas can produce effects. Without his presence, they have no effect.
Commentary

This verse describes the influence of the Lord who dwells in the universal form. Dravyam means the material cause (upādāna), starting with earth. Karma, kāla and svabhāva [Note: According to the commentary on 2.5.14 svabhāva is the ability of the guṇas to transform themselves. ] are efficient causes (nimitta). Jīva refers to Hiraṇyagarbha, the enjoyer, the totality of jīvas. [Note: This is a form of Brahmā.] Because of being connected to the Lord, these things exist. Without the Paramātmā, the jīva or his body cannot exist. Or without the Paramātmā, these items cannot produce effects.

Material ingredients, activities, time, modes, and the beings who enjoy them all exist by His mercy. The moment He withdraws attention, all becomes nonexistent. We're being maintained breath by breath.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I live as if I existed by my own steam, or as continuously maintained?
  • How does breath-by-breath dependence change how I receive each ordinary moment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.13

↗
एको नानात्वमन्विच्छन् योगतल्पात् समुत्थित: । वीर्यं हिरण्मयं देवो मायया व्यसृजत् त्रिधा ॥ १३ ॥
eko nānātvam anvicchan
[eko naanaatvam anvichchan]
yoga-talpāt samutthitaḥ
[yoga-talpaat samutthitah]
vīryaṁ hiraṇmayaṁ devo
[veeryam hiranmayam devo]
māyayā vyasṛjat tridhā
[maayayaa vyasrijat tridhaa]
ekaḥ — He, one alone nānātvam — varieties anvicchan — so desiring yoga-talpāt — from the bedstead of mystic slumber samutthitaḥ — thus generated vīryam — the semen hiraṇmayam — golden hue devaḥ — the demigod māyayā — by the external energy vyasṛjat — perfectly created tridhā — in three features.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eko nānātvam anvicchan
ekaḥ
He, one alone
nānātvam
varieties
anvicchan
so desiring
yoga-talpāt samutthitaḥ
yoga-talpāt
from the bedstead of mystic slumber
samutthitaḥ
thus generated
vīryaṁ hiraṇmayaṁ devo
vīryam
the semen
hiraṇmayam
golden hue
devaḥ
the demigod
māyayā vyasṛjat tridhā
māyayā
by the external energy
vyasṛjat
perfectly created
tridhā
in three features.
The Lord, while lying on His bed of mystic slumber, generated the seminal symbol, golden in hue, through external energy out of His desire to manifest varieties of living entities from Himself alone.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (9.7-8) the creation and annihilation of the material world are stated as follows:

sarva-bhūtāni kaunteya prakṛtiṁ yānti māmikām kalpa-kṣaye punas tāni kalpādau visṛjāmy aham

prakṛtiṁ svām avaṣṭabhya visṛjāmi punaḥ punaḥ bhūta-grāmam imaṁ kṛtsnam avaśaṁ prakṛter vaśāt

“At the end of each millennium the creative forces, namely the material nature and the living entities who struggle in the material nature, all merge together into the transcendental body of the Lord, and again when the Lord desires to manifest them, all of them are again displayed by the Lord. Therefore the material nature is working under the control of the Lord. All of them, under the agency of material nature and under the control of the Lord, are thus repeatedly created and annihilated by the will of the Lord.”

As such, before the creation or manifestation of the material cosmic world, the Lord exists as total energy ( mahā-samaṣṭi ), and thus desiring Himself to be diffused to many, He expands Himself further into multitotal energy ( samaṣṭi ). From the multitotal energy He further expands Himself into individuals in three dimensions, namely adhyātmic, adhidaivic and adhibhautic, as explained before ( vyaṣṭi ). As such, the whole creation and the creative energies are nondifferent and different simultaneously. Because everything is an emanation from Him (the Mahā-Viṣṇu or Mahā-samaṣṭi), nothing of the cosmic energies is different from Him; but all such expanded energies have specific functions and display as designed by the Lord, and therefore they are simultaneously different from the Lord. The living entities are also similar energy (marginal potency) of the Lord, and thus they are simultaneously one with and different from Him.

At the stage of nonmanifestation, the living energies remain potent in the Lord, and when they are let loose in the cosmic manifestation they are exhibited differently in terms of different desires under the modes of nature. Such differential manifestations of the living energies are conditional states of the living entities. The liberated living entities, however, in the sanātana (eternal) manifestation, are unconditionally surrendered souls, and therefore they are not subject to the conditions of creation and annihilation. So this creation takes place by the glance of the Lord from His bedstead of mystic slumber. And thus all the universes and the lord of the universe, Brahmā, are again and again manifested and annihilated.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The one Lord, desiring to become many, rose from his bed after the sleep of universal destruction, and created the universe shining brightly in three forms by his energy. The Lord created three forms: adhidaivam (sense devatā), adhyātmam (subtle sense organ) and adhibhūtam (gross sense form).
Commentary

How did the universal form (samaṣṭi-virāḍ) arise? This verse explains. The one entity, merging the jīvas in himself at the time of destruction, was situated as one. After that (anu), at the time of creation, he desired variety (nānātvam). He then separated the jīvas from himself. From his bed of yoga, having slept at the time of destruction, representing night, the spiritual puruṣa (devaḥ) then rose up in the morning, at the time of creation. Having created the elements such as mahat-tattva by his energy (māyayā), he created by these elements the universe with its layers, shining brightly (vīryam) with golden color. This is the great creation. The creation of the universal form situated in the shell measuring five hundred million yojanas took place by combining the Lord’s energy with parts of the elements such as mahat-tattva. The puruṣa then entered the shell of the universe, filled half of it with water emanating from himself, and placing the universal form within himself, went to sleep on the Garbhodaka ocean. After that, he rose from his bed and manifested the totality of the universe, golden in color, in three forms. What are the three forms? These are adhidaivam, adhyātmam and adhibhūtam. [Note: These aspects are explained in the commentary on verse 18.]

That totatliy or samaṣṭi will become the lotus stem arising from the Lord’s navel and this lotus stem will become the gross form of the universal form with fourteen planetary systems. It will also become the subtle Hiraṇyagarbha, the form of Brahmā consisting of the totality of jīvas. It will also become the four-headed Brahmā who carries out creation. Thus Brahmā has three forms. [Note: Brahmā three forms are: 1) 4-headed Brahmā; 2) Hiraṇyagarbha; and 3) Universal form.] Now let us return to the topic at hand.

Lying in mystic slumber, the Lord generates the golden seminal symbol through external energy, willing to manifest varieties of living entities from Himself. Diverse beings have one secret origin — He pictured them all in advance.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I taken seriously that every other being also came from this same single source?
  • How does shared origin change how I see the people I find most different from me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.14

↗
अधिदैवमथाध्यात्ममधिभूतमिति प्रभु: । अथैकं पौरुषं वीर्यं त्रिधाभिद्यत तच्छृणु ॥ १४ ॥
adhidaivam athādhyātmam
[adhidaivam athaadhyaatmam]
adhibhūtam iti prabhuḥ
[adhibhootam iti prabhuh]
athaikaṁ pauruṣaṁ vīryaṁ
[athaikam paurusham veeryam]
tridhābhidyata tac chṛṇu
[tridhaabhidyata tach chrinu]
adhidaivam — the controlling entities atha — now adhyātmam — the controlled entities adhibhūtam — the material bodies iti — thus prabhuḥ — the Lord atha — in this way ekam — one only pauruṣam — of His Lordship vīryam — potency tridhā — in three abhidyata — divided tat — that śṛṇu — just hear from me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
adhidaivam athādhyātmam
adhidaivam
the controlling entities
atha
now
adhyātmam
the controlled entities
adhibhūtam iti prabhuḥ
adhibhūtam
the material bodies
iti
thus
prabhuḥ
the Lord
athaikaṁ pauruṣaṁ vīryaṁ
atha
in this way
ekam
one only
pauruṣam
of His Lordship
vīryam
potency
tridhābhidyata tac chṛṇu
tridhā
in three
abhidyata
divided
tat
that
śṛṇu
just hear from me.
Just hear from me how the potency of His Lordship divides one into three, called the controlling entities, the controlled entities and the material bodies, in the manner mentioned above.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then the one shining puruṣa divided into three forms. Please hear about this.
Commentary

These three forms (universal form, Hiraṇyagarbha and four-headed Brahmā) are different from the adhidaiva, adhyātma and adhibhūta.

The Lord's potency divides into three — controlling beings (deities), controlled beings (souls), and material bodies. Listen and understand how the three relate. Without this distinction we confuse who is doing what.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I clearly distinguish what is my body, my soul, and the controlling deity in any action?
  • Where would a sharper three-fold view reduce my confusion?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.15

↗
अन्त:शरीर आकाशात् पुरुषस्य विचेष्टत: । ओज: सहो बलं जज्ञे तत: प्राणो महानसु: ॥ १५ ॥
antaḥ śarīra ākāśāt
[antah shareera aakaashaat]
puruṣasya viceṣṭataḥ
[purushasya vicheshtatah]
ojaḥ saho balaṁ jajñe
[ojah saho balam jajne]
tataḥ prāṇo mahān asuḥ
[tatah praano mahaan asuh]
antaḥ śarīre — within the body ākāśāt — from the sky puruṣasya — of Mahā-Viṣṇu viceṣṭataḥ — while so trying, or willing ojaḥ — the energy of the senses sahaḥ — mental force balam — bodily strength jajñe — generated tataḥ — thereafter prāṇaḥ — the living force mahān asuḥ — the fountainhead of everyone’s life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
antaḥ śarīra ākāśāt
antaḥ śarīre
within the body
ākāśāt
from the sky
puruṣasya viceṣṭataḥ
puruṣasya
of Mahā-Viṣṇu
viceṣṭataḥ
while so trying, or willing
ojaḥ saho balaṁ jajñe
ojaḥ
the energy of the senses
sahaḥ
mental force
balam
bodily strength
jajñe
generated
tataḥ prāṇo mahān asuḥ
tataḥ
thereafter
prāṇaḥ
the living force
mahān asuḥ
the fountainhead of everyone’s life.
From the sky situated within the transcendental body of the manifesting Mahā-Viṣṇu, sense energy, mental force and bodily strength are all generated, as well as the sum total of the fountainhead of the total living force.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the ether within the body of the universal form who was acting in various ways arose the śaktis of the senses, mind and body, and from them arose the best life air called sūtra.
Commentary

From the ether within the body of the universal form who was acting in various ways (viceṣṭataḥ) arose the energies of the senses (ojaḥ), the mind (sahaḥ) and the body (balam). From the subtle form of these three energies (tataḥ) arose the best life air, manifestor of life (asuḥ) called sūtra (prāṇaḥ). [Note: Sūtra is a portion of mahat-tattva, with a predominance of rajas. It is not part of vāyu. This is explained in the commentary on 2.5.24.]

From the sky within the Lord's transcendental body, sense energy, mental force, and bodily strength all come — plus the fountainhead of the total living force itself. Everything we 'have' is downstream of His body.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I credit personal effort for capacities that were downstream gifts?
  • How does this trace-back affect my sense of ownership?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.16

↗
अनुप्राणन्ति यं प्राणा: प्राणन्तं सर्वजन्तुषु । अपानन्तमपानन्ति नरदेवमिवानुगा: ॥ १६ ॥
anuprāṇanti yaṁ prāṇāḥ
[anupraananti yam praanaah]
prāṇantaṁ sarva-jantuṣu
[praanantam sarva-jantushu]
apānantam apānanti
[apaanantam apaananti]
nara-devam ivānugāḥ
[nara-devam ivaanugaah]
anuprāṇanti — follow the living symptoms yam — whom prāṇāḥ — senses prāṇantam — endeavoring sarva-jantuṣu — in all living entities apānantam — stop endeavoring apānanti — all others stop nara-devam — a king iva — like anugāḥ — the followers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anuprāṇanti yaṁ prāṇāḥ
anuprāṇanti
follow the living symptoms
yam
whom
prāṇāḥ
senses
prāṇantaṁ sarva-jantuṣu
prāṇantam
endeavoring
sarva-jantuṣu
in all living entities
apānantam apānanti
apānantam
stop endeavoring
apānanti
all others stop
nara-devam ivānugāḥ
nara-devam
a king
iva
like
anugāḥ
the followers.
As the followers of a king follow their lord, similarly when the total energy is in motion, all other living entities move, and when the total energy stops endeavoring, all other living entities stop sensual activities.

The individual living entities are completely dependent on the total energy of the supreme puruṣa. No one has independent existence, just as no electric lamp has independent effulgence. Each and every electrical instrument depends fully on the total powerhouse, the total powerhouse depends on the reservoir of water for generating electricity, water depends on the clouds, the clouds depend on the sun, the sun depends on creation, and the creation depends on the movement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the cause of all causes.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The senses become active following after the action of sūtra, and become inactive when the sūtra becomes inactive, just as servants follow after a king.
Commentary

This shows the greatness of the sūtra by its power to manifest life. The senses (prāṇāḥ) perform actions following after the sūtra which performs action, and they cease action when the sūtra stops action. They are like servants of a king.

Individual beings move only when the total energy moves and stop when it stops — like courtiers following the king. No electric lamp shines independently; nothing in my life acts independently of His turning.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying to shine when the powerhouse isn't currently delivering?
  • How does it free me to rest when the total energy itself isn't endeavoring?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.17

↗
प्राणेनाक्षिपता क्षुत् तृडन्तरा जायते विभो: । पिपासतो जक्षतश्च प्राङ्‍मुखं निरभिद्यत ॥ १७ ॥
prāṇenākṣipatā kṣut tṛḍ
[praanenaakshipataa kshut trid]
antarā jāyate vibhoḥ
[antaraa jaayate vibhoh]
pipāsato jakṣataś ca
[pipaasato jakshatash cha]
prāṅ mukhaṁ nirabhidyata
[praan mukham nirabhidyata]
prāṇena — by the living force ākṣipatā — being agitated kṣut — hunger tṛṭ — thirst antarā — from within jāyate — generates vibhoḥ — of the Supreme pipāsataḥ — being desirous to quench the thirst jakṣataḥ — being desirous to eat ca — and prāk — at first mukham — the mouth nirabhidyata — was opened.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prāṇenākṣipatā kṣut tṛḍ
prāṇena
by the living force
ākṣipatā
being agitated
kṣut
hunger
tṛṭ
thirst
antarā jāyate vibhoḥ
antarā
from within
jāyate
generates
vibhoḥ
of the Supreme
pipāsato jakṣataś ca
pipāsataḥ
being desirous to quench the thirst
jakṣataḥ
being desirous to eat
ca
and
prāṅ mukhaṁ nirabhidyata
prāk
at first
mukham
the mouth
nirabhidyata
was opened.
The living force, being agitated by the virāṭ-puruṣa, generated hunger and thirst, and when He desired to drink and eat, the mouth opened.

The process by which all living beings in the womb of the mother develop their sense organs and sense perceptions appears to follow the same principles in the case of the virāṭ-puruṣa, the sum total of all living entities. Therefore the supreme cause of all generation is not impersonal or without desire. The desires for all kinds of sense perception and sense organs exist in the Supreme, and thus they take place in the individual persons. This desire is the nature of the supreme living being, the Absolute Truth. Because He has the sum total of all mouths, the individual living entities have mouths. Similarly with all other senses and sense organs. Here the mouth is the symbolic representation of all sense organs, for the same principles apply to the others also.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being stimulated by the sūtra, hunger and thirst appeared within the universal form. He desired to drink and eat. First the mouth became distinct.
Commentary

Being agitated by sūtra, hunger and thirst arose within the universal form (vibhoḥ). This form is addressed as the lord because the form is being worshipped with respect. The universal form is here being attributed to be the Supreme Lord. Then the form desired to eat and drink. First the mouth became distinct (nirabhidyata).

Even hunger and thirst originated in the virāṭ-puruṣa's living force — and so the mouth opened. The supreme cause is not impersonal or desireless; desire exists in Him as the source of every appetite we have.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I assumed desire is unspiritual, when it actually arises from the Supreme Person?
  • Which of my desires could I trace back to its origin in His desire?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.18

↗
मुखतस्तालु निर्भिन्नं जिह्वा तत्रोपजायते । ततो नानारसो जज्ञे जिह्वया योऽधिगम्यते ॥ १८ ॥
mukhatas tālu nirbhinnaṁ
[mukhatas taalu nirbhinnam]
jihvā tatropajāyate
[jihvaa tatropajaayate]
tato nānā-raso jajñe
[tato naanaa-raso jajne]
jihvayā yo ’dhigamyate
[jihvayaa yo ’dhigamyate]
mukhataḥ — from the mouth tālu — the palate nirbhinnam — being generated jihvā — the tongue tatra — thereupon upajāyate — becomes manifested tataḥ — thereupon nānā-rasaḥ — various tastes jajñe — became manifested jihvayā — by the tongue yaḥ — which adhigamyate — become relished.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mukhatas tālu nirbhinnaṁ
mukhataḥ
from the mouth
tālu
the palate
nirbhinnam
being generated
jihvā tatropajāyate
jihvā
the tongue
tatra
thereupon
upajāyate
becomes manifested
tato nānā-raso jajñe
tataḥ
thereupon
nānā-rasaḥ
various tastes
jajñe
became manifested
jihvayā yo ’dhigamyate
jihvayā
by the tongue
yaḥ
which
adhigamyate
become relished.
From the mouth the palate became manifested, and thereupon the tongue was also generated. After this all the different tastes came into existence so that the tongue can relish them.

This gradual process of evolution suggests the explanation of the controlling deities ( adhidaiva ) because Varuṇa is the controlling deity for all relishable juices. Therefore the mouth becomes the resting place for the tongue, which tastes all the different juices, of which the controlling deity is Varuṇa. This suggests, therefore, that Varuṇa was also generated along with the development of the tongue. The tongue and the palate, being instrumental, are adhibhūtam, or forms of matter, but the functioning deity, who is a living entity, is adhidaiva, whereas the person undergoing the function is adhyātma. Thus the three categories are also explained as to their birth after the opening of the mouth of the virāṭ-puruṣa. The four principles mentioned in this verse serve to explain the three main principles, namely the adhyātma, adhidaiva and adhibhutam, as explained before.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After the appearance of the mouth, the palate became differentiated, and on the palate the tongue appeared. From that various tastes which are experienced by the tongue were generated.
Commentary

This verse elaborates on the adhidaiva, adhibhūta and adhyātma mentioned in verse 13. After the mouth appeared (mukhataḥ), the location of the sense organ, the palate (gross organ), became differentiated. In the palate, the subtle sense organ called the tongue appeared. From that, various tastes, the sense objects for the tongue, appeared. Also the presiding deity of the tongue, Varuṇa should be understood to have appeared. In this description, the gross palate and the sense object are the adhibhūta aspect. The subtle sense organ is adhyātma, and Varuṇa, the presiding deity, is the adhidaiva aspect. Though there are four elements (gross form, sense object, subtle sense organ and deity), they are classified as three in the above manner.

From the mouth came palate and tongue, then all relishable tastes — under Varuṇa's control. Even the pleasure of taste is administered by a deity. Eat with the awareness that you eat under sanction.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I eat as if taste were mine alone, or with awareness of administration?
  • What would a single meal eaten in awareness of sanction feel like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.19

↗
विवक्षोर्मुखतो भूम्नो वह्निर्वाग् व्याहृतं तयो: । जले चैतस्य सुचिरं निरोध: समजायत ॥ १९ ॥
vivakṣor mukhato bhūmno
[vivakshor mukhato bhoomno]
vahnir vāg vyāhṛtaṁ tayoḥ
[vahnir vaag vyaahritam tayoh]
jale caitasya suciraṁ
[jale chaitasya suchiram]
nirodhaḥ samajāyata
[nirodhah samajaayata]
vivakṣoḥ — when there was a need to speak mukhataḥ — from the mouth bhūmnaḥ — of the Supreme vahniḥ — fire or the controlling deity of fire vāk — vibration vyāhṛtam — speeches tayoḥ — by both jale — in the water ca — however etasya — of all these suciram — a very, very long time nirodhaḥ — suspension samajāyata — did continue.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vivakṣor mukhato bhūmno
vivakṣoḥ
when there was a need to speak
mukhataḥ
from the mouth
bhūmnaḥ
of the Supreme
vahnir vāg vyāhṛtaṁ tayoḥ
vahniḥ
fire or the controlling deity of fire
vāk
vibration
vyāhṛtam
speeches
tayoḥ
by both
jale caitasya suciraṁ
jale
in the water
ca
however
etasya
of all these
suciram
a very, very long time
nirodhaḥ samajāyata
nirodhaḥ
suspension
samajāyata
did continue.
When the Supreme desired to speak, speeches were vibrated from the mouth. Then the controlling deity Fire was generated from the mouth. But when He was lying in the water, all these functions remained suspended.

The peculiarity of the gradual development of the different senses is simultaneously supported by their controlling deities. It is to be understood, therefore, that the activities of the sense organs are controlled by the will of the Supreme. The senses are, so to speak, offering a license for the conditioned souls, who are to use them properly under the control of the controlling deity deputed by the Supreme Lord. One who violates such controlling regulations has to be punished by degradation to a lower status of life. Consider, for example, the tongue and its controlling deity, Varuṇa. The tongue is meant for eating, and men, animals and birds each have their different tastes because of different licenses. The taste of human beings and that of the swine are not on the same level. The controlling deity, however, awards or certifies a particular type of body when the particular living entity develops a taste in terms of different modes of nature. If the human being develops taste without discrimination, as does the swine, then the controlling deity is certainly certified for the next term to award him the body of a swine. The swine accepts any kind of foodstuff, including stools, and a human being who has developed such indiscriminate taste must be prepared for a degraded life in the next life. Such a life is also God’s grace because the conditioned soul desired a body like that for perfectly tasting a particular type of foodstuff. If a man gets the body of a swine it must be considered the grace of the Lord because the Lord awards the facility. After death the next body is offered by superior control, not blindly. A human being, therefore, must be on his guard as to what sort of body he is going to have in the next life. An irresponsible life of indiscrimination is risky, and that is the declaration of all scriptures.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to speak, from his mouth, the devatā of fire, the voice sense organ and speech, which is dependent on the devatā and the sense organ, appeared. When the form resided in the water for a long time, obstruction appeared for the universal form. When the life air became active, the two nostrils became differentiated. When the universal form desired to smell, Vāyu, who carries fragrance, fragrance, and the nose appeared.
Commentary

In the location of the mouth (mukhataḥ) of the universal form appeared the devatā fire, the subtle sense organ voice and the sense object speech (vyāhrtam), which is dependent on the devatā and the sense (tayoḥ).

When obstruction took place in the water for the universal form, without breathing he could not continue existence. The nostrils are the location, the gross form, by which breathing can take place. When the life air (nabhasvati) became very active (dodhūyati), the two nostrils (gross organ) became differentiated. Air or Vāyu, who carries the fragrance, is the devatā, and fragrance is the sense object. The nose is the subtle sense object. Jighṛkṣataḥ means “of he who desired to receive smells.”

Speech was vibrated from the mouth and the deity Fire was generated. Sense organs offer a license to conditioned souls — break the controlling regulations and a fall to lower life follows. Senses are licenses, not free goods.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my senses am I using in violation of its license?
  • What 'controlling regulation' would I do well to honor in my speech this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.20

↗
नासिके निरभिद्येतां दोधूयति नभस्वति । तत्र वायुर्गन्धवहो घ्राणो नसि जिघृक्षत: ॥ २० ॥
nāsike nirabhidyetāṁ
[naasike nirabhidyetaam]
dodhūyati nabhasvati
[dodhooyati nabhasvati]
tatra vāyur gandha-vaho
[tatra vaayur gandha-vaho]
ghrāṇo nasi jighṛkṣataḥ
[ghraano nasi jighrikshatah]
nāsike — in the nostrils nirabhidyetām — being developed dodhūyati — rapidly blowing nabhasvati — air respiration tatra — thereupon vāyuḥ — air gandha-vahaḥ — smelling odor ghrāṇaḥ — sense of smell nasi — in the nose jighṛkṣataḥ — desiring to smell odors.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāsike nirabhidyetāṁ
nāsike
in the nostrils
nirabhidyetām
being developed
dodhūyati nabhasvati
dodhūyati
rapidly blowing
nabhasvati
air respiration
tatra vāyur gandha-vaho
tatra
thereupon
vāyuḥ
air
gandha-vahaḥ
smelling odor
ghrāṇo nasi jighṛkṣataḥ
ghrāṇaḥ
sense of smell
nasi
in the nose
jighṛkṣataḥ
desiring to smell odors.
Thereafter, when the supreme puruṣa desired to smell odors, the nostrils and respiration were generated, the nasal instrument and odors came into existence, and the controlling deity of air, carrying smell, also became manifested.

The nasal instrument, odor, and the controlling deity of air, smelling, etc., all became manifested simultaneously when the Lord desired to smell. The Vedic mantras confirm this statement in the Upaniṣads’ statement that everything is first desired by the Supreme before the subordinate living entity can act upon it. The living entity can see only when the Lord sees, the living entity can smell when the Lord smells, and so on. The idea is that the living entity cannot do anything independently. He can simply think of doing something independently, but he cannot act independently. This independence in thinking is there by the grace of the Lord, but the thinking can be given shape by the grace of the Lord, and therefore the common saying is that man proposes and God disposes. The whole explanation is on the subject of the absolute dependence of the living entities and absolute independence of the Supreme Lord. Less intelligent persons claiming to be on an equal level with God must first prove themselves to be absolute and independent, and then they must substantiate their claim to being one with God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to speak, from his mouth, the devatā of fire, the voice sense organ and speech, which is dependent on the devatā and the sense organ, appeared. When the form resided in the water for a long time, obstruction appeared for the universal form. When the life air became active, the two nostrils became differentiated. When the universal form desired to smell, Vāyu, who carries fragrance, fragrance, and the nose appeared.
Commentary

In the location of the mouth (mukhataḥ) of the universal form appeared the devatā fire, the subtle sense organ voice and the sense object speech (vyāhrtam), which is dependent on the devatā and the sense (tayoḥ).

When obstruction took place in the water for the universal form, without breathing he could not continue existence. The nostrils are the location, the gross form, by which breathing can take place. When the life air (nabhasvati) became very active (dodhūyati), the two nostrils (gross organ) became differentiated. Air or Vāyu, who carries the fragrance, is the devatā, and fragrance is the sense object. The nose is the subtle sense object. Jighṛkṣataḥ means “of he who desired to receive smells.”

Nostrils, breath, smell, and the air deity all manifested when the Lord desired to smell. Living beings can see only when He sees, smell only when He smells. We have no independent action — only by His grace can thinking become acting.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I imagine I can will action without His enabling?
  • How does this dependence reframe my next 'I did it' moment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.21

↗
यदात्मनि निरालोकमात्मानं च दिद‍ृक्षत: । निर्भिन्ने ह्यक्षिणी तस्य ज्योतिश्चक्षुर्गुणग्रह: ॥ २१ ॥
yadātmani nirālokam
[yadaatmani niraalokam]
ātmānaṁ ca didṛkṣataḥ
[aatmaanam cha didrikshatah]
nirbhinne hy akṣiṇī tasya
[nirbhinne hy akshinee tasya]
jyotiś cakṣur guṇa-grahaḥ
[jyotish chakshur guna-grahah]
yadā — while ātmani — unto Himself nirālokam — without any light ātmānam — His own transcendental body ca — also other bodily forms didṛkṣataḥ — desired to look upon nirbhinne — due to being sprouted hi — for akṣiṇī — of the eyes tasya — of Him jyotiḥ — the sun cakṣuḥ — the eyes guṇa-grahaḥ — the power of seeing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadātmani nirālokam
yadā
while
ātmani
unto Himself
nirālokam
without any light
ātmānaṁ ca didṛkṣataḥ
ātmānam
His own transcendental body
ca
also other bodily forms
didṛkṣataḥ
desired to look upon
nirbhinne hy akṣiṇī tasya
nirbhinne
due to being sprouted
hi
for
akṣiṇī
of the eyes
tasya
of Him
jyotiś cakṣur guṇa-grahaḥ
jyotiḥ
the sun
cakṣuḥ
the eyes
guṇa-grahaḥ
the power of seeing.
Thus when everything existed in darkness, the Lord desired to see Himself and all that was created. Then the eyes, the illuminating god Sun, the power of vision and the object of sight all became manifested.

The universe is by nature dense darkness, and therefore the total creation is called tamas, or darkness. The night is the real feature of the universe, for then one cannot see anything, including oneself. The Lord, out of His causeless mercy, first desired to see Himself and all the creation as well, and thus the sun became manifested, the power of vision for all living entities became possible, and the objects of vision were also manifested. This means that the whole phenomenal world became visible after the creation of the sun.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When there was no vision in the universal form, and he desired to see, the two eyes, the presiding deity known as the sun, the sense organ called the eye, which experiences form (sense object) appeared.
Commentary

When there was no vision (nirālokam) within himself (ātmani), desiring to see himself and other objects (ca), the location called the gross eye, the sun devatā and the eye (subtle sense organ) which experiences form (guṇa) appeared. Form is the sense object. Nirālokam (devoid of vision) is an indeclinable word, like nirmakṣikam (free from flies).

When the Lord desired to see Himself and creation, eyes, the sun-deity, vision, and visible objects all manifested. The universe is natively dense darkness; what we call 'the world seen' is a temporary illumination granted by His desire to see.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I treat what I see as 'just there', or as a temporary illumination by His will?
  • What changes in my looking when I receive it as His desire to see being passed to me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.22

↗
बोध्यमानस्य ऋषिभिरात्मनस्तज्जिघृक्षत: । कर्णौ च निरभिद्येतां दिश: श्रोत्रं गुणग्रह: ॥ २२ ॥
bodhyamānasya ṛṣibhir
[bodhyamaanasya rishibhir]
ātmanas taj jighṛkṣataḥ
[aatmanas taj jighrikshatah]
karṇau ca nirabhidyetāṁ
[karnau cha nirabhidyetaam]
diśaḥ śrotraṁ guṇa-grahaḥ
[dishah shrotram guna-grahah]
bodhyamānasya — desiring to understand ṛṣibhiḥ — by the authorities ātmanaḥ — of the Supreme Being tat — that jighṛkṣataḥ — when He desired to take up karṇau — the ears ca — also nirabhidyetām — became manifested diśaḥ — the direction or the god of air śrotram — the power of hearing guṇa-grahaḥ — and the objects of hearing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bodhyamānasya ṛṣibhir
bodhyamānasya
desiring to understand
ṛṣibhiḥ
by the authorities
ātmanas taj jighṛkṣataḥ
ātmanaḥ
of the Supreme Being
tat
that
jighṛkṣataḥ
when He desired to take up
karṇau ca nirabhidyetāṁ
karṇau
the ears
ca
also
nirabhidyetām
became manifested
diśaḥ śrotraṁ guṇa-grahaḥ
diśaḥ
the direction or the god of air
śrotram
the power of hearing
guṇa-grahaḥ
and the objects of hearing.
By development of the desire of the great sages to know, the ears, the power of hearing, the controlling deity of hearing, and the objects of hearing became manifested. The great sages desired to hear about the Self.

As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, by advancement of knowledge one should try to know about the Supreme Lord, the summum bonum of everything. Knowledge does not mean knowledge only of the laws of nature or physical knowledge, which are working by the direction of the Lord. The scientists are eager to hear about the physical laws working in material nature. They are eager to hear through the medium of radio and television about things taking place far away from them on other planets, but they should know that the power of hearing and the instruments for hearing were given to them by the Lord for hearing about the Self, or about the Lord. Unfortunately the power of hearing is misused in hearing the vibrations of mundane affairs. The great sages were interested in hearing about the Lord through Vedic knowledge and nothing more. That is the beginning of aural reception of knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to understand himself, which is revealed by Vedic sound, the two gross ears, the direction devatās, and subtle ear organ, which receives sound, appeared.
Commentary

When the universal form desired to receive understanding about himself which is revealed in the Vedas, the ears appeared. Guṇa-grahaḥ here means that the ears receive sound, the sense object for the ear.

Ears and hearing came from the sages' desire to hear about the Self. Modern hearing chases radio, TV, news from far-off planets — but the ear's real purpose is to hear about Him. Misused, the noblest sense becomes the noisiest.
Reflection Questions
  • What share of my hearing is going to the Self vs. to noise from far away?
  • What practice would re-tune my ear to its intended purpose?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.23

↗
वस्तुनो मृदुकाठिन्यलघुगुर्वोष्णशीतताम् । जिघृक्षतस्त्वङ् निर्भिन्ना तस्यां रोममहीरुहा: । तत्र चान्तर्बहिर्वातस्त्वचा लब्धगुणो वृत: ॥ २३ ॥
vastuno mṛdu-kāṭhinya-
[vastuno mridu-kaathinya-]
laghu-gurv-oṣṇa-śītatām
[laghu-gurv-oshna-sheetataam]
jighṛkṣatas tvaṅ nirbhinnā
[jighrikshatas tvan nirbhinnaa]
tasyāṁ roma-mahī-ruhāḥ
[tasyaam roma-mahee-ruhaah]
tatra cāntar bahir vātas
[tatra chaantar bahir vaatas]
tvacā labdha-guṇo vṛtaḥ
[tvachaa labdha-guno vritah]
vastunaḥ — of all matter mṛdu — softness kāṭhinya — hardness laghu — lightness guru — heaviness oṣṇa — warmness śītatām — coldness jighṛkṣataḥ — desiring to perceive tvak — the touch sensation nirbhinnā — distributed tasyām — in the skin roma — hairs on the body mahī-ruhāḥ — as well as the trees, the controlling deities tatra — there ca — also antaḥ — within bahiḥ — outside vātaḥ tvacā — the sense of touch or the skin labdha — having been perceived guṇaḥ — objects of sense perception vṛtaḥ — generated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vastuno mṛdu-kāṭhinya-
vastunaḥ
of all matter
mṛdu
softness
kāṭhinya
hardness
laghu-gurv-oṣṇa-śītatām
laghu
lightness
guru
heaviness
oṣṇa
warmness
śītatām
coldness
jighṛkṣatas tvaṅ nirbhinnā
jighṛkṣataḥ
desiring to perceive
tvak
the touch sensation
nirbhinnā
distributed
tasyāṁ roma-mahī-ruhāḥ
tasyām
in the skin
roma
hairs on the body
mahī-ruhāḥ
as well as the trees, the controlling deities
tatra cāntar bahir vātas
tatra
there
ca
also
antaḥ
within
bahiḥ
outside
vātaḥ tvacā
the sense of touch or the skin
tvacā labdha-guṇo vṛtaḥ
labdha
having been perceived
guṇaḥ
objects of sense perception
vṛtaḥ
generated.
When there was a desire to perceive the physical characteristics of matter, such as softness, hardness, warmth, cold, lightness and heaviness, the background of sensation, the skin, the skin pores, the hairs on the body and their controlling deities (the trees) were generated. Within and outside the skin is a covering of air through which sense perception became prominent.

The physical characteristics of matter, such as softness, are subjects of sense perception, and thus physical knowledge is the subject matter of the touch sensation. One can measure the temperature of matter by touching with the hand, and one can measure the weight of an object by lifting it with the hand and thus estimate its heaviness or lightness. The skin, the skin pores and the hairs on the body are all interdependent with the touch sensation. The air blowing within and outside the skin is also an object of sense perception. This sense perception is also a source of knowledge, and therefore it is suggested here that physical or physiological knowledge is subordinate to the knowledge of the Self, as above mentioned. Knowledge of Self can expand to the knowledge of phenomena, but physical knowledge cannot lead to knowledge of the Self.

There is, however, an intimate relation between the hairs on the body and the vegetation on the body of the earth. The vegetables are nourishment for the skin both as food and medicine, as stated in the Third Canto: tvacam asya vinirbhinnāṁ viviśur dhiṣṇyam oṣadhīḥ.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to receive the sensations or qualities of softness, hardness, lightness, heaviness, warmth and coolness in objects, skin appeared. Oṣṇa stands for ā uṣṇa, which means slight heat. Since intense warmth is the sense object (which only arises after the desire), slight warmth is mentioned because of the desire for warmth in general. There is also a version without the prefix, gurv uṣṇa. The skin is the location of the sense organ. Because one understands the lightness or heaviness of objects by placing them in the hands, lightness and heaviness are the sense objects. This is according to the followers of the Purāṇas. In that location (adhibhūta) the devatā Vāyu (adhidaiva) is situated, extending internally and externally, by the sense organ (adhyātma) called skin which receives the sense object called touch (adhibhūta). In that location also, the hair is the sense organ, the herbs are the devatā and the sense object is itching. Thus in the skin there are two sense organs. The meaning is this. The sense organ skin is called hair when it receives touch sensation along with itching externally. The plants act as the presiding deity of that skin (hair). When the sense organ skin receives touch internally or externally it is called skin. Its deity is Vāyu or air. In the Third Canto it is said: nirbhinnāny asya carmāṇi loka-pālo ’nilo ’viśat | prāṇenāṁśena saṁsparśaṁ yenāsau pratipadyate || tvacam asya vinirbhinnāṁ viviśur dhiṣṇyam oṣadhīḥ | aṁśena lomabhiḥ kaṇḍūṁ yair asau pratipadyate || When there was a manifestation of skin separated from the gigantic form, Anila, the deity directing the wind, entered with the sense organ skin, and thus the living entities can realize tactile knowledge. When the gross skin of the universal form appeared, the presiding deities the plants (along with their portion subtle organ called body hair entered. By these body hairs, relief from itching appears. . SB 3.6.16, 18 Carmāṇi indicates skin. Prāṇena aṁśena means “with the sense organ called skin, which is spread with prāṇa-vāyu.” In the Bahvṛca-śruti this is partly described. tvaṅ nirabhidyata tvaco lomāni lomabhya oṣadhi-vanaspatayaḥ The skin differentiated. From that came hairs. From hairs came the plants and trees. Aitareya Upaniṣad 1.4
When perception of softness, warmth, weight was desired, skin, hairs, pores, and tree-deities became manifested. Physical science is subordinate to knowledge of the Self. Touch can teach, but it cannot finally know.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I overrating physical knowledge as the deepest knowledge?
  • How could touch and physical perception become a doorway, not a ceiling?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.24

↗
हस्तौ रुरुहतुस्तस्य नानाकर्मचिकीर्षया । तयोस्तु बलवानिन्द्र आदानमुभयाश्रयम् ॥ २४ ॥
hastau ruruhatus tasya
[hastau ruruhatus tasya]
nānā-karma-cikīrṣayā
[naanaa-karma-chikeershayaa]
tayos tu balavān indra
[tayos tu balavaan indra]
ādānam ubhayāśrayam
[aadaanam ubhayaashrayam]
hastau — the hands ruruhatuḥ — manifested tasya — His nānā — various karma — work cikīrṣayā — being so desirous tayoḥ — of them tu — however balavān — to give strength indraḥ — the demigod in heaven ādānam — activities of the hand ubhaya-āśrayam — dependent on both the demigod and the hand.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hastau ruruhatus tasya
hastau
the hands
ruruhatuḥ
manifested
tasya
His
nānā-karma-cikīrṣayā
nānā
various
karma
work
cikīrṣayā
being so desirous
tayos tu balavān indra
tayoḥ
of them
tu
however
balavān
to give strength
indraḥ
the demigod in heaven
ādānam ubhayāśrayam
ādānam
activities of the hand
ubhaya-āśrayam
dependent on both the demigod and the hand.
Thereafter when the Supreme Person desired to perform varieties of work, the two hands and their controlling strength, and Indra, the demigod in heaven, became manifested, as also the acts dependent on both the hands and the demigod.

In every item we can note with profit that the sense organs of the living entity are never independent at any stage. The Lord is known as the Lord of the senses (Hṛṣīkeśa). Thus the sense organs of the living entities are manifested by the will of the Lord, and each organ is controlled by a certain type of demigod. No one, therefore, can claim any proprietorship of the senses. The living entity is controlled by the senses, the senses are controlled by the demigods, and the demigods are the servants of the Supreme Lord. That is the arrangement in the system of creation. The whole thing is controlled ultimately by the Supreme Lord, and there is no independence either of the material nature or of the living entity. The illusioned living entity who claims to be the lord of his senses is under the clutches of the external energy of the Lord. As long as a living entity continues to be puffed up by his tiny existence, he is to be understood to be under the stringent control of the external energy of the Lord, and there is no question of liberation from the clutches of illusion ( māyā ), however much one may declare himself a liberated soul.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to perform various activities, the two hands, their strength, the deity Indra and the sense object, namely, receiving things, which takes shelter of the devatā and the sense organ, appeared.
Commentary

Strength of the hands is the sense organ. Indra is the devatā; the sense object is receiving things, which is dependent on the sense organ and the devatā (ubhayāśrayam).

When work was desired, hands, their strength, and Indra came forth. No sense organ is independent; each is controlled by a deity, who in turn serves the Supreme. There is no human proprietorship over the senses.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I most strongly feel that my hands are 'mine' to do as I please?
  • What would change if every act of my hand were done as deputy service?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.25

↗
गतिं जिगीषत: पादौ रुरुहातेऽभिकामिकाम् । पद्‍भ्यां यज्ञ: स्वयं हव्यं कर्मभि: क्रियते नृभि: ॥ २५ ॥
gatiṁ jigīṣataḥ pādau
[gatim jigeeshatah paadau]
ruruhāte ’bhikāmikām
[ruruhaate ’bhikaamikaam]
padbhyāṁ yajñaḥ svayaṁ havyaṁ
[padbhyaam yajnah svayam havyam]
karmabhiḥ kriyate nṛbhiḥ
[karmabhih kriyate nribhih]
gatim — movement jigīṣataḥ — so desiring pādau — the legs ruruhāte — being manifested abhikāmikām — purposeful padbhyām — from the legs yajñaḥ — Lord Viṣṇu svayam — personally Himself havyam — the duties karmabhiḥ — by one’s occupational duty kriyate — caused to be done nṛbhiḥ — by different human beings.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gatiṁ jigīṣataḥ pādau
gatim
movement
jigīṣataḥ
so desiring
pādau
the legs
ruruhāte ’bhikāmikām
ruruhāte
being manifested
padbhyāṁ yajñaḥ svayaṁ havyaṁ
karmabhiḥ kriyate nṛbhiḥ
abhikāmikām
purposeful
padbhyām
from the legs
yajñaḥ
Lord Viṣṇu
svayam
personally Himself
havyam
the duties
karmabhiḥ
by one’s occupational duty
kriyate
caused to be done
nṛbhiḥ
by different human beings.
Thereupon, because of His desiring to control movement, His legs became manifested, and from the legs the controlling deity named Viṣṇu was generated. By His personal supervision of this act, all varieties of human being are busily engaged in dutiful occupational sacrifice.

Every human being is engaged in his particular occupational duty, and such activities are visible as men go hither and thither. This is very prominently visible in big cities of the world: people are going all over the cities with great concern, from one place to another. This movement is not limited only to the cities, but is also visible outside the cities from one place to another, or from one city to another, by different means of vehicles. Men are moving by cars and rails on the roads, by subways within the earth and by planes in the sky for the purpose of business success. But in all these movements the real purpose is to earn wealth for comfortable life. For this comfortable life the scientist is engaged, the artist is engaged, the engineer is engaged, the technician is engaged, all in different branches of human activity. But they do not know how to make the activities purposeful to fulfill the mission of human life. Because they do not know this secret, all their activities are targeted towards the goal of sense gratification without control, and therefore by all this business they are unknowingly entering into the deep regions of darkness.

Because they have been captivated by the external energy of the Supreme Lord, they have completely forgotten the Supreme Lord Viṣṇu, and thus they have taken it for granted that this life, as presently manifested under the conditions of material nature, is all in all for enjoying the highest amount of sense gratification. But such a wrong conception of life cannot give anyone the desired peace of mind, and thus in spite of all advancement in knowledge by use of the resources of nature, no one is happy in this material civilization. The secret is that at every step they should try to execute sacrifices toward the path of world peace. The Bhagavad-gītā (18.45-46) also advises the same secret in the following verses.

sve sve karmaṇy abhirataḥ saṁsiddhiṁ labhate naraḥ sva-karma-nirataḥ siddhiṁ yathā vindati tac chṛṇu

yataḥ pravṛttir bhūtānāṁ yena sarvam idaṁ tatam sva-karmaṇā tam abhyarcya siddhiṁ vindati mānavaḥ

The Lord said to Arjuna: “Just hear from Me how one can attain the highest perfection in life simply by discharging his specified occupational duty. Man can attain the highest perfection of life by worshiping the Supreme Lord and by performing sacrifice for the sake of the Supreme Lord Viṣṇu, who is all-pervading and by whose control every living being acquires his desired facilities, according to his personal propensity.”

There is no harm in having different propensities in life because every human being is proportionately independent to chalk out the plan of his life by different occupations, but one should make it a point in his life to know perfectly well that he is not independent absolutely. One is certainly under the control of the Supreme Lord and under different agencies. Knowing this, one should make it a point that by his work and the result of his labor he serves the Supreme Lord as prescribed by the authorities expert in the transcendental loving service of the Supreme Lord Viṣṇu. For performing such occupational duties of life the leg is the most important instrument of the body because without the help of the legs one cannot move from one place to another, and therefore the Lord has special control over the legs of all human beings, which are meant for performing yajñas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired movement, dear to him, two feet appeared. The devatā of the feet is Yajña. By the sense organ of feet, men go about to collect objects for sacrifice.
Commentary

Desiring to move about (gatim) which was dear to him (abhikāmikām), the two feet (adhibhūta) appeared. The literal meaning of jigīṣataḥ (of one who desires to obtain) means in this case simply “of one who desires.” Yajña, empowered by Viṣṇu, is situated as the devatā of the feet. The sense organ is indicated by the word karmabhiḥ, the śakti of the action of going. By the sense organ of the feet one goes about to collect items for sacrifice. This going about is the sense object. Nṛbhiḥ indicates that all the individual jīvas perform these acts. The feet are used to obtain objects which are prescribed by the scriptures.

Legs and Viṣṇu the deity manifested for movement, and now humans busily go everywhere in cars, trains, planes — all motion finally aimed at earning a comfortable life. But the deeper purpose of movement is occupational sacrifice to Him.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of my movement aims at comfort, and how much at sacrifice?
  • What 'going somewhere' tomorrow could I reframe as occupational service?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.26

↗
निरभिद्यत शिश्नो वै प्रजानन्दामृतार्थिन: । उपस्थ आसीत् कामानां प्रियं तदुभयाश्रयम् ॥ २६ ॥
nirabhidyata śiśno vai
[nirabhidyata shishno vai]
prajānandāmṛtārthinaḥ
[prajaanandaamritaarthinah]
upastha āsīt kāmānāṁ
[upastha aaseet kaamaanaam]
priyaṁ tad-ubhayāśrayam
[priyam tad-ubhayaashrayam]
nirabhidyata — came out śiśnaḥ — the genitals vai — certainly prajā-ānanda — sex pleasure amṛta-arthinaḥ — aspiring to taste the nectar upasthaḥ — the male or female organ āsīt — came into existence kāmānām — of the lustful priyam — very dear tat — that ubhaya-āśrayam — shelter for both.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nirabhidyata śiśno vai
nirabhidyata
came out
śiśnaḥ
the genitals
vai
certainly
prajānandāmṛtārthinaḥ
prajā-ānanda
sex pleasure
amṛta-arthinaḥ
aspiring to taste the nectar
upastha āsīt kāmānāṁ
upasthaḥ
the male or female organ
āsīt
came into existence
kāmānām
of the lustful
priyaṁ tad-ubhayāśrayam
priyam
very dear
tat
that
ubhaya-āśrayam
shelter for both.
Thereupon, for sexual pleasure, begetting offspring and tasting heavenly nectar, the Lord developed the genitals, and thus there is the genital organ and its controlling deity, the Prajāpati. The object of sexual pleasure and the controlling deity are under the control of the genitals of the Lord.

The heavenly pleasure for the conditioned soul is sexual pleasure, and this pleasure is tasted by the genitals. The woman is the object of sexual pleasure, and both the sense perception of sexual pleasure and the woman are controlled by the Prajāpati, who is under the control of the Lord’s genitals. The impersonalist must know from this verse that the Lord is not impersonal, for He has His genitals, on which all the pleasurable objects of sex depend. No one would have taken the trouble to maintain children if there were no taste of heavenly nectar by means of sexual intercourse. This material world is created to give the conditioned souls a chance for rejuvenation for going back home, back to Godhead, and therefore generation of the living being is necessary for upkeep of the purpose of creation. Sexual pleasure is an impetus for such action, and as such, one can even serve the Lord in the act of such sexual pleasure. The service is counted when the children born of such sexual pleasure are properly trained in God consciousness. The whole idea of material creation is to revive the dormant God consciousness of the living entity. In forms of life other than the human form, sexual pleasure is prominent without any motive of service for the mission of the Lord. But in the human form of life the conditioned soul can render service to the Lord by creating progeny suitable for the attainment of salvation. One can beget hundreds of children and enjoy the celestial pleasure of sexual intercourse, provided he is able to train the children in God consciousness. Otherwise begetting children is on the level of the swine. Rather, the swine is more expert than the human being because the swine can beget a dozen piglets at a time, whereas the human being can give birth to only one at a time. So one should always remember that the genitals, sexual pleasure, the woman and the offspring are all related in the service of the Lord, and one who forgets this relationship in the service of the Supreme Lord becomes subjected to the threefold miseries of material existence by the laws of nature. Perception of sexual pleasure is there even in the body of the dog, but there is no sense of God consciousness. The human form of life is distinct from that of the dog by the perception of God consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired offspring, sexual pleasure and enjoyment of Svarga, the penis appeared. The subtle sense organ, the devatā of the sex organ, and the pleasure of enjoyment with woman, which is dependent on the sex organ and the devatā, appeared.
Commentary

When the universal form desired offspring, sexual pleasure and enjoyment like Svarga, the location of the sex organ (adhibhūta) appeared. As well as the sense organ called the penis, the devatā Prajāpati should be understood to have appeared. [Note: Elsewhere Daksā is mentioned as the presiding deity.] The sense object happiness, arising from relationship with a woman, which is dependent on the sense organ and the devatā, also arose.

Genitals and Prajāpati came forth for sexual pleasure, offspring, and the taste of heavenly nectar. The Lord is not impersonal — He has organs and their controlling deities. The world's design includes this pleasure as a way home, not a stop.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I treat sex as an end, or as a part of a larger design pointing home?
  • How does it shift my view to know even this pleasure depends on the Lord's own organ?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.27

↗
उत्सिसृक्षोर्धातुमलं निरभिद्यत वै गुदम् । तत: पायुस्ततो मित्र उत्सर्ग उभयाश्रय: ॥ २७ ॥
utsisṛkṣor dhātu-malaṁ
[utsisrikshor dhaatu-malam]
nirabhidyata vai gudam
[nirabhidyata vai gudam]
tataḥ pāyus tato mitra
[tatah paayus tato mitra]
utsarga ubhayāśrayaḥ
[utsarga ubhayaashrayah]
utsisṛkṣoḥ — desiring to evacuate dhātu-malam — refuse of eatables nirabhidyata — became open vai — certainly gudam — the evacuating hole tataḥ — thereafter pāyuḥ — the evacuating sense organ tataḥ — thereafter mitraḥ — the controlling demigod utsargaḥ — the substance evacuated ubhaya — both āśrayaḥ — shelter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
utsisṛkṣor dhātu-malaṁ
utsisṛkṣoḥ
desiring to evacuate
dhātu-malam
refuse of eatables
nirabhidyata vai gudam
nirabhidyata
became open
vai
certainly
gudam
the evacuating hole
tataḥ pāyus tato mitra
tataḥ
thereafter
pāyuḥ
the evacuating sense organ
tataḥ
thereafter
mitraḥ
the controlling demigod
utsarga ubhayāśrayaḥ
utsargaḥ
the substance evacuated
ubhaya
both
āśrayaḥ
shelter.
Thereafter, when He desired to evacuate the refuse of eatables, the evacuating hole, anus, and the sensory organ thereof developed along with the controlling deity Mitra. The sensory organ and the evacuating substance are both under the shelter of the controlling deity.

Even in the matter of evacuating stool, the refuse is controlled, so how can the living entity claim to be independent?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to expel waste products, the gross anus appeared. Then the sense organ called anus, its devatā Mitra, and the sense object expulsion, dependent on the anus and Mitra, appeared.
Commentary

Desiring to expel the waste products of digested food (dhātu-malam) the anus, the gross location, appeared. The sense organ of excretion (pāyuḥ), the devatā Mitra [Note: In the commentary on 2.6.9 it is explained that the deity is Mṛtyu and Mitra is an assistant.] and the sense object expulsion appeared.

Even evacuation came forth with its own controlling deity Mitra. If even excretion is controlled, what use is the claim of human independence? Humility down to the bowels.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I claim independence in areas that are completely arranged?
  • What humble bodily fact today could remind me how little is actually 'mine'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.28

↗
आसिसृप्सो: पुर: पुर्या नाभिद्वारमपानत: । तत्रापानस्ततो मृत्यु: पृथक्त्वमुभयाश्रयम् ॥ २८ ॥
āsisṛpsoḥ puraḥ puryā
[aasisripsoh purah puryaa]
nābhi-dvāram apānataḥ
[naabhi-dvaaram apaanatah]
tatrāpānas tato mṛtyuḥ
[tatraapaanas tato mrityuh]
pṛthaktvam ubhayāśrayam
[prithaktvam ubhayaashrayam]
āsisṛpsoḥ — desiring to go everywhere puraḥ — in different bodies puryāḥ — from one body nābhi-dvāram — the navel or abdominal hole apānataḥ — was manifested tatra — thereupon apānaḥ — stopping of the vital force tataḥ — thereafter mṛtyuḥ — death pṛthaktvam — separately ubhaya — both āśrayam — shelter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āsisṛpsoḥ puraḥ puryā
āsisṛpsoḥ
desiring to go everywhere
puraḥ
in different bodies
puryāḥ
from one body
nābhi-dvāram apānataḥ
nābhi-dvāram
the navel or abdominal hole
apānataḥ
was manifested
tatrāpānas tato mṛtyuḥ
tatra
thereupon
apānaḥ
stopping of the vital force
tataḥ
thereafter
mṛtyuḥ
death
pṛthaktvam ubhayāśrayam
pṛthaktvam
separately
ubhaya
both
āśrayam
shelter.
Thereafter, when He desired to move from one body to another, the navel and the air of departure and death were combinedly created. The navel is the shelter for both, namely death and the separating force.

The prāṇa-vāyu continues the life, and the apāna-vāyu stops the living force. Both the vibrations are generated from the abdominal hole, the navel. This navel is the joint from one body to the other. Lord Brahmā was born of the abdominal hole of Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu as a separate body, and the same principle is followed even in the birth of any ordinary body. The body of the child develops from the body of the mother, and when the child is separated from the body of the mother, it is separated by cutting the navel joint. And that is the way the Supreme Lord manifested Himself as separated many. The living entities are therefore separated parts, and thus they have no independence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to go from his body to another body by the path of apāna and prāṇa, the location of the opening of the navel, sense organ apāna, the devatā Mṛtyu and the sense object death, which takes shelter of the devatā and the sense organ, arose.
Commentary

When the universal form desired to go from his body (puryā) into other bodies (puraḥ), by the path of apāna and also prāṇa, though not mentioned, the location of the navel, the sense organ apāna, the devatā Mṛtyu and the sense object death (pṛthaktvam), which depends on the apāna and the devatā, arose. It is well known that death involves separation from the bonds of both prāṇa and apāna in the navel region.

Navel, prāṇa, and apāna were created for moving from one body to another. The same principle by which Brahmā was born from Viṣṇu's navel governs every birth. Death and the separating force are arranged precisely at the joint.
Reflection Questions
  • Does death scare me less when I see it as a 'joint' designed for the next step?
  • How does my picture of life-to-life movement shift with this image?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.29

↗
आदित्सोरन्नपानानामासन् कुक्ष्यन्त्रनाडय: । नद्य: समुद्राश्च तयोस्तुष्टि: पुष्टिस्तदाश्रये ॥ २९ ॥
āditsor anna-pānānām
[aaditsor anna-paanaanaam]
āsan kukṣy-antra-nāḍayaḥ
[aasan kukshy-antra-naadayah]
nadyaḥ samudrāś ca tayos
[nadyah samudraash cha tayos]
tuṣṭiḥ puṣṭis tad-āśraye
[tushtih pushtis tad-aashraye]
āditsoḥ — desiring to have anna-pānānām — of food and drink āsan — there became kukṣi — the abdomen antra — the intestines nāḍayaḥ — and the arteries nadyaḥ — the rivers samudrāḥ — seas ca — also tayoḥ — of them tuṣṭiḥ — sustenance puṣṭiḥ — metabolism tat — of them āśraye — the source.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āditsor anna-pānānām
āditsoḥ
desiring to have
anna-pānānām
of food and drink
āsan kukṣy-antra-nāḍayaḥ
āsan
there became
kukṣi
the abdomen
antra
the intestines
nāḍayaḥ
and the arteries
nadyaḥ samudrāś ca tayos
nadyaḥ
the rivers
samudrāḥ
seas
ca
also
tayoḥ
of them
tuṣṭiḥ puṣṭis tad-āśraye
tuṣṭiḥ
sustenance
puṣṭiḥ
metabolism
tat
of them
āśraye
the source.
When there was a desire to have food and drink, the abdomen and the intestines and also the arteries became manifested. The rivers and seas are the source of their sustenance and metabolism.

The controlling deities of the intestines are the rivers, and those of the arteries, the seas. Fulfillment of the belly with food and drink is the cause of sustenance, and the metabolism of the food and drink replaces the waste of the bodily energies. Therefore, the body’s health is dependent on healthy actions of the intestines and the arteries. The rivers and the seas, being the controlling deities of the two, keep the intestines and the arteries in healthy order.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to take in food and drink, the location of the abdomen, the sense organs in the form of the intestines and veins, their devatās the rivers and oceans, and their sense objects, fullness from food and fullness from liquids, which take shelter of the sense organs and their devatās, appeared.
Commentary

When the universal form desired to consume food and drink, the abdomen, intestine and veins appeared. The abdomen is the location. The sense organ is located in the intestines which absorbs the food. The veins are the sense organs which absorb liquids. The devatās of the veins are the rivers and the devatā of the intestines is the ocean. Tuṣṭi means the fullness of the belly and puṣṭi means fullness because of taste. Tuṣṭi is the sense object dependent on the intestines and the ocean, and puṣṭi is the sense object dependent on the veins and rivers.

Abdomen, intestines, and arteries came from the desire for food and drink. Rivers and seas are their controlling deities — so the health of the body is held in arrangement with the health of waters. Macrocosm and microcosm interlock.
Reflection Questions
  • How does my caring for waters of the world connect to my caring for my own gut and arteries?
  • What change in eating or drinking would honor this arrangement?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.30

↗
निदिध्यासोरात्ममायां हृदयं निरभिद्यत । ततो मनश्चन्द्र इति सङ्कल्प: काम एव च ॥ ३० ॥
nididhyāsor ātma-māyāṁ
[nididhyaasor aatma-maayaam]
hṛdayaṁ nirabhidyata
[hridayam nirabhidyata]
tato manaś candra iti
[tato manash chandra iti]
saṅkalpaḥ kāma eva ca
[sankalpah kaama eva cha]
nididhyāsoḥ — being desirous to know ātma-māyām — own energy hṛdayam — the location of the mind nirabhidyata — was manifested tataḥ — thereafter manaḥ — the mind candraḥ — the controlling deity of the mind, the moon iti — thus saṅkalpaḥ — determination kāmaḥ — desire eva — as much as ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nididhyāsor ātma-māyāṁ
nididhyāsoḥ
being desirous to know
ātma-māyām
own energy
hṛdayaṁ nirabhidyata
hṛdayam
the location of the mind
nirabhidyata
was manifested
tato manaś candra iti
tataḥ
thereafter
manaḥ
the mind
candraḥ
the controlling deity of the mind, the moon
iti
thus
saṅkalpaḥ kāma eva ca
saṅkalpaḥ
determination
kāmaḥ
desire
eva
as much as
ca
also.
When there was a desire to think about the activities of His own energy, then the heart (the seat of the mind), the mind, the moon, determination and all desire became manifested.

The heart of every living entity is the seat of the Supersoul, Paramātmā, a plenary expansion of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Without His presence the living entity cannot get into the working energy according to his past deeds. The living entities who are conditioned in the material world are manifested in the creation in terms of respective inclinations inherent in them, and the requisite material body is offered to each and every one of them by the material energy under the direction of the Supersoul. This is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.10) . When, therefore, the Supersoul is situated in the heart of the conditioned soul, the requisite mind is manifested in the conditioned soul, and he becomes conscious of his occupation as one is conscious of his duty after waking up from slumber. Therefore the material mind of the living entity develops when the Supersoul sits on his heart, after which the mind, the controlling deity (moon), and then the activities of the mind (namely thinking, feeling and willing) all take place. The activities of the mind cannot begin without the manifestation of the heart, and the heart becomes manifested when the Lord wants to see the activities of the material creation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the universal form desired to contemplate material objects and illusions concerning himself, the heart appeared. Then the sense organ called the mind, the devatā called Candra and the sense objects determination and desire arose.
Commentary

Desiring to contemplate māyā concerning himself and objects created by māyā, the location called the heart appeared. Then sense organ called the mind, the devatā called Candra, and the sense objects determination and desire appeared. From the Third Canto (3.6.23-26) it is also understood that in the location of the heart, the senses known as cittā, false ego and intelligence, and the devatās Vāsudeva, Rudra and Brahmā also appeared. In this way, eighteen senses have been mentioned. This is known from the Eleventh Canto. [Note: SB 11.22.31-32]

Related verses
Heart, mind, the moon, determination, and all desire came forth when the Lord desired to think about His energy. The mind is the seat of the Supersoul; the conditioned mind is given by the material energy under His direction.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose director is my mind currently — Supersoul, or my conditioning?
  • What would tuning into the Supersoul in the heart look like for me today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.31

↗
त्वक्‍चर्ममांसरुधिरमेदोमज्जास्थिधातव: । भूम्यप्तेजोमया: सप्त प्राणो व्योमाम्बुवायुभि: ॥ ३१ ॥
tvak-carma-māṁsa-rudhira-
[tvak-charma-maamsa-rudhira-]
medo-majjāsthi-dhātavaḥ
[medo-majjaasthi-dhaatavah]
bhūmy-ap-tejomayāḥ sapta
[bhoomy-ap-tejomayaah sapta]
prāṇo vyomāmbu-vāyubhiḥ
[praano vyomaambu-vaayubhih]
tvak — the thin layer on the skin carma — skin māṁsa — flesh rudhira — blood medaḥ — fat majjā — marrow asthi — bone dhātavaḥ — elements bhūmi — earth ap — water tejaḥ — fire mayāḥ — predominating sapta — seven prāṇaḥ — breathing air vyoma — sky ambu — water vāyubhiḥ — by the air.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvak-carma-māṁsa-rudhira-
tvak
the thin layer on the skin
carma
skin
māṁsa
flesh
rudhira
blood
medo-majjāsthi-dhātavaḥ
medaḥ
fat
majjā
marrow
asthi
bone
dhātavaḥ
elements
bhūmy-ap-tejomayāḥ sapta
bhūmi
earth
ap
water
tejaḥ
fire
mayāḥ
predominating
sapta
seven
prāṇo vyomāmbu-vāyubhiḥ
prāṇaḥ
breathing air
vyoma
sky
ambu
water
vāyubhiḥ
by the air.
The seven elements of the body, namely the thin layer on the skin, the skin itself, the flesh, blood, fat, marrow and bone, are all made of earth, water and fire, whereas the life breath is produced by the sky, water and air.

The construction of the whole material world is prominently made by three elements, namely earth, water and fire. But the living force is produced by sky, air and water. So water is the common element in both the gross and subtle forms of all material creation, and it should be noted herewith that due to necessity, water, being most prominent in the material creation, is the principal element of all the five. This material body is thus an embodiment of the five elements, and the gross manifestation is perceived because of three, namely earth, water, and fire. Sensations of touch are perceived due to the thin layer on the skin, and bone is as good as hard stone. The breathing air of life is produced of sky, air and water, and therefore open air, regular bath and ample space in which to live are favorable for healthy vitality. Fresh produce from the earth like grains and vegetables, as well as fresh water and heat, is good for the upkeep of the gross body.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The seven dhātus known as skin, its upper layer, muscle, blood, fat, marrow and bone,are composed of predominantly of earth, water and fire. The life airs are nourished by ether and water.
Commentary

Having described the sense organs (adhyātma), gross locations, sense objects (adhibhūta) and sense devatās (adhidaiva), Śukadeva describes the nature of the dhātus and other items which arise as portions of the elements in two verses. Tvak and carma are the gross and subtle aspects of skin. The seven dhātus starting with skin and ending with bone are composed of earth, water and fire elements. Though those items have all five elements as components, because air and ether do not nourish the body through food and other items (whereas water, earth and fire do), only three elements are mentioned. The prāṇa composed of airs is nourished by ether and water. Putting all three items in plural instrumental case is poetic license.

Seven layers of the body — skin, deeper skin, flesh, blood, fat, marrow, bone — are made of earth, water, and fire. The life-breath is of sky, air, and water. Water is the common ingredient throughout. We are mostly arranged water and breath.
Reflection Questions
  • How does seeing the body as 'arranged water and breath' soften my identification with it?
  • What changes when I treat the body as five-element architecture, not as 'me'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.32

↗
गुणात्मकानीन्द्रियाणि भूतादिप्रभवा गुणा: । मन: सर्वविकारात्मा बुद्धिर्विज्ञानरूपिणी ॥ ३२ ॥
guṇātmakānīndriyāṇi
[gunaatmakaaneendriyaani]
bhūtādi-prabhavā guṇāḥ
[bhootaadi-prabhavaa gunaah]
manaḥ sarva-vikārātmā
[manah sarva-vikaaraatmaa]
buddhir vijñāna-rūpiṇī
[buddhir vijnaana-roopinee]
guṇa-ātmakāni — attached to the qualities indriyāṇi — the senses bhūta-ādi — material ego prabhavāḥ — influenced by guṇāḥ — the modes of material nature manaḥ — the mind sarva — all vikāra — affection (happiness and distress) ātmā — form buddhiḥ — intelligence vijñāna — deliberation rūpiṇī — featuring.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
guṇātmakānīndriyāṇi
guṇa-ātmakāni
attached to the qualities
indriyāṇi
the senses
bhūtādi-prabhavā guṇāḥ
bhūta-ādi
material ego
prabhavāḥ
influenced by
guṇāḥ
the modes of material nature
manaḥ sarva-vikārātmā
manaḥ
the mind
sarva
all
vikāra
affection (happiness and distress)
ātmā
form
buddhir vijñāna-rūpiṇī
buddhiḥ
intelligence
vijñāna
deliberation
rūpiṇī
featuring.
The sense organs are attached to the modes of material nature, and the modes of material nature are products of the false ego. The mind is subjected to all kinds of material experiences (happiness and distress), and the intelligence is the feature of the mind’s deliberation.

Illusioned by the material nature, the living entity identifies with false ego. More clearly, when the living entity is entrapped by the material body, he at once identifies with the bodily relationships, forgetting his own identity as spirit soul. This false ego associates with different modes of material nature, and thus the senses become attached to the modes of material nature. Mind is the instrument for feeling different material experiences, but intelligence is deliberative and can change everything for the better. The intelligent person, therefore, can attain salvation from the illusion of material existence by proper use of intelligence. An intelligent person can detect the awkward position of material existence and thus begin to inquire as to what he is, why he is subjected to different kinds of miseries, and how to get rid of all miseries, and thus, by good association, an advanced intelligent person can turn towards the better life of self-realization. It is advised, therefore, that an intelligent person associate with the great sages and saints who are on the path of salvation. By such association, one can receive instructions which are able to slacken the conditioned soul’s attachment for matter, and thus the intelligent man gradually gets rid of the illusion of matter and false ego and is promoted to the real life of eternity, knowledge and bliss.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The senses gravitate to sense objects. The sense objects appear attractive because of false ego. The mind sustains all changes. The intelligence consists of the power of discrimination.
Commentary

The senses’ nature is to gravitate to sense objects (gunātmaka). The sense objects (guṇāḥ) become attractive (prabhavā) by false ego (bhūtādi). The mind sustains all changes (sarva-vikārātmā – like happiness, distress, etc.) Buddhi consists of the power of discrimination. In this way, the nature of both the mind and the intelligence has been described.

Sense organs attach to the modes; modes are products of false ego; mind feels happiness and distress; intelligence deliberates. An intelligent person can use intelligence to escape the trap. Intelligence is the lever, not the cage.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I using intelligence to deepen the trap or to deliberate my way out?
  • What 'awkward position' could intelligence detect for me this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.33

↗
एतद्भगवतो रूपं स्थूलं ते व्याहृतं मया । मह्यादिभिश्चावरणैरष्टभिर्बहिरावृतम् ॥ ३३ ॥
etad bhagavato rūpaṁ
[etad bhagavato roopam]
sthūlaṁ te vyāhṛtaṁ mayā
[sthoolam te vyaahritam mayaa]
mahy-ādibhiś cāvaraṇair
[mahy-aadibhish chaavaranair]
aṣṭabhir bahir āvṛtam
[ashtabhir bahir aavritam]
etat — all these bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead rūpam — form sthūlam — gross te — unto you vyāhṛtam — explained mayā — by me mahī — the planets ādibhiḥ — and so on ca — unlimitedly avaraṇaiḥ — by coverings aṣṭabhiḥ — by eight bahiḥ — external āvṛtam — covered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etad bhagavato rūpaṁ
etat
all these
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
rūpam
form
sthūlaṁ te vyāhṛtaṁ mayā
sthūlam
gross
te
unto you
vyāhṛtam
explained
mayā
by me
mahy-ādibhiś cāvaraṇair
mahī
the planets
ādibhiḥ
and so on
ca
unlimitedly
avaraṇaiḥ
by coverings
aṣṭabhir bahir āvṛtam
aṣṭabhiḥ
by eight
bahiḥ
external
āvṛtam
covered.
Thus by all this, the external feature of the Personality of Godhead is covered by gross forms such as those of planets, which were explained to you by me.

As explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.4) , the separated material energy of the Personality of Godhead is covered by eight kinds of material coverings: earth, water, fire, air, sky, mind, intelligence and false ego. All these are emanations from the Personality of Godhead as His external energy. These coverings are just like the covering of clouds for the sun. The cloud is a creation of the sun, yet it actually covers the eyes so that one cannot see the sun. The sun cannot be covered by the clouds. The cloud can at utmost extend a few hundreds of miles in the sky, but the sun is far greater than millions of miles. So a hundred-mile covering is not competent to cover millions of miles. Therefore, one of the various energies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead cannot, of course, cover the Lord. But these coverings are created by Him to cover the eyes of the conditioned souls who want to lord it over the material nature. Actually the conditioned souls are covered by the illusory creative cloud of matter, and the Lord reserves the right of not being exposed to their eyes. Because they have no eyes of transcendental vision and because they cannot see the Personality of Godhead, they therefore deny the existence of the Lord and the transcendental form of the Lord. The covering of the gigantic material feature is accepted by such men with a poor fund of knowledge, and how this is so is explained in the following verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I have thus described to you the composition of one universe as a form of the Lord, which is covered by eight layers of earth, water, fire, air, ether, false ego, mahat-tattva and prakṛti.
Commentary

Sthūlam refers to the universal form, the totality of one universe. Mahy-ādhibhiḥ refers to the layers around the universe. The universe with its covering is called the mahā-samaṣṭi or mahā-sthūlam.

The Lord's external feature is covered by gross forms like planets — earth, water, fire, air, sky, mind, intelligence, false ego. These are like clouds covering the sun for our eyes; the Sun itself isn't covered. We are the covered ones.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of the eight coverings most thickly blocks my view of Him?
  • What practice could thin one of those clouds?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.34

↗
अत: परं सूक्ष्मतममव्यक्तं निर्विशेषणम् । अनादिमध्यनिधनं नित्यं वाङ्‍मनस: परम् ॥ ३४ ॥
ataḥ paraṁ sūkṣmatamam
[atah param sookshmatamam]
avyaktaṁ nirviśeṣaṇam
[avyaktam nirvisheshanam]
anādi-madhya-nidhanaṁ
[anaadi-madhya-nidhanam]
nityaṁ vāṅ-manasaḥ param
[nityam vaan-manasah param]
ataḥ — therefore param — transcendental sūkṣmatamam — finer than the finest avyaktam — unmanifested nirviśeṣaṇam — without material features anādi — without beginning madhya — without an intermediate stage nidhanam — without end nityam — eternal vāk — words manasaḥ — of the mind param — transcendental.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ataḥ paraṁ sūkṣmatamam
ataḥ
therefore
param
transcendental
sūkṣmatamam
finer than the finest
avyaktaṁ nirviśeṣaṇam
avyaktam
unmanifested
nirviśeṣaṇam
without material features
anādi-madhya-nidhanaṁ
anādi
without beginning
madhya
without an intermediate stage
nidhanam
without end
nityaṁ vāṅ-manasaḥ param
nityam
eternal
vāk
words
manasaḥ
of the mind
param
transcendental.
Therefore beyond this [gross manifestation] is a transcendental manifestation finer than the finest form. It has no beginning, no intermediate stage and no end; therefore it is beyond the limits of expression or mental speculation and is distinct from the material conception.

The gross external body of the Supreme is manifested at certain intervals, and thus the external feature or form of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is not the eternal form of the Lord, which has no beginning, no intermediate stage and no end. Anything which has a beginning, interim and end is called material. The material world is begun from the Lord, and thus the form of the Lord, before the beginning of the material world, is certainly transcendental to the finest, or the finer material conception. The ether in the material world is considered to be the finest. Finer than the ether is mind, intelligence and false ego. But all eight of the outward coverings are explained as outer coverings of the Absolute Truth. The Absolute Truth is therefore beyond the expression and speculation of the material conception. He is certainly transcendental to all material conceptions. This is called nirviśeṣaṇam. One should not, however, misunderstand nirviśeṣaṇam as being without any transcendental qualifications. Viśeṣaṇam means qualities. Therefore nir added to it means that he has no material qualities or variegatedness. This nullifying expression is described in four transcendental qualifications, namely unmanifested, transcendental, eternal, and beyond the conception of mind or word. Beyond the limits of words means negation of the material conception. Unless one is transcendentally situated, it is not possible to know the transcendental form of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Besides this there is the very subtle invisible form, without qualities or form, which has no beginning or end, remains eternally in one form and which is beyond words and mind.
Commentary

Having described the gross form, now the subtle form of the universe is described. When the most subtle is mentioned, it means very subtle. The subtle body (of the universe), a form of māyā, is described by four phrases.

Beyond the gross there is a transcendental manifestation finer than the finest, with no beginning, middle, or end — beyond expression and speculation. The Lord's eternal form is more real than ether or mind itself.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I keep imagining the spiritual as 'less' than the material, when scripture says it is finer?
  • Where am I substituting mental speculation for the inexpressible Real?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.35

↗
अमुनी भगवद्रूपे मया ते ह्यनुवर्णिते । उभे अपि न गृह्णन्ति मायासृष्टे विपश्चित: ॥ ३५ ॥
amunī bhagavad-rūpe
[amunee bhagavad-roope]
mayā te hy anuvarṇite
[mayaa te hy anuvarnite]
ubhe api na gṛhṇanti
[ubhe api na grihnanti]
māyā-sṛṣṭe vipaścitaḥ
[maayaa-srishte vipashchitah]
amunī — all these bhagavat — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead rūpe — in the forms mayā — by me te — unto you hi — certainly anuvarṇite — described respectively ubhe — both api — also na — never gṛhṇanti — accepts māyā — external sṛṣṭe — being so manifested vipaḥ-citaḥ — the learned one who knows.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
amunī bhagavad-rūpe
amunī
all these
bhagavat
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead
rūpe
in the forms
mayā te hy anuvarṇite
mayā
by me
te
unto you
hi
certainly
anuvarṇite
described respectively
ubhe api na gṛhṇanti
ubhe
both
api
also
na
never
gṛhṇanti
accepts
māyā-sṛṣṭe vipaścitaḥ
māyā
external
sṛṣṭe
being so manifested
vipaḥ-citaḥ
the learned one who knows.
Neither of the above forms of the Lord, as just described unto you from the material angle of vision, is accepted by the pure devotees of the Lord who know Him well.

The impersonalists think of the Absolute Personality of Godhead in two different ways, as above mentioned. On the one hand they worship the Lord in His viśva-rūpa, or all-pervading universal form, and on the other they think of the Lord’s unmanifested, indescribable, subtle form. The theories of pantheism and monism are respectively applicable to these two conceptions of the Supreme as gross and subtle, but both of them are rejected by the learned pure devotees of the Lord because they are aware of the factual position. This is very clearly mentioned in the Eleventh Chapter of the Bhagavad-gītā, which records Arjuna’s experience of the viśva-rūpa of the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa:

adṛṣṭa-pūrvaṁ hṛṣito ’smi dṛṣṭvā bhayena ca pravyathitaṁ mano me tad eva me darśaya deva rūpaṁ prasīda deveśa jagan-nivāsa

(Bg. 11.45)

Arjuna, as a pure devotee of the Lord, never previously saw the contemplated universal form of the Lord ( viśva-rūpa ), but when he did see it, his curiosities were satisfied. But he was not happy to see such a form of the Lord because of his attachment as a pure devotee. He was afraid to see the gigantic form of the Lord. He therefore prayed to the Lord to assume His four-handed Nārāyaṇa or Kṛṣṇa form, which alone could please Arjuna. Undoubtedly the Lord has the supreme potency to exhibit Himself in multifarious forms, but the pure devotees of the Lord are interested in His forms as eternally exhibited in the abode of the Lord, known as the tripād-vibhūti or kingdom of God. The Lord in the tripād-vibhūti abode exhibits Himself in two forms, either with four hands or with two hands. The viśva-rūpa exhibited in the material manifestation has unlimited hands and unlimited dimensions with everything unlimited. The pure devotees of the Lord worship Him in His Vaikuṇṭha forms as Nārāyaṇa or Kṛṣṇa. Sometimes the same Vaikuṇṭha forms of the Lord are in the material world also by His grace as Śrī Rāma, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, Śrī Narasiṁhadeva, etc., and thus the pure devotees also worship them. Usually the features shown in the material world have no existence in the Vaikuṇṭha planets, and thus they are not accepted by the pure devotees. What the pure devotees worship from the very beginning are eternal forms of the Lord existing in the Vaikuṇṭha planets. The nondevotee impersonalists imagine the material forms of the Lord, and ultimately they merge in the impersonal brahmajyoti of the Lord, whereas the pure devotees of the Lord are worshipers of the Lord both in the beginning and also in the perfect stage of salvation, eternally. The worship of the pure devotee never stops, whereas the worship of the impersonalist stops after his attainment of salvation, when he merges in the impersonal form of the Lord known as the brahmajyoti. Therefore the pure devotees of the Lord are described here as vipaścita, or the learned who are in the knowledge of the Lord perfectly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wise do not accept these two forms of the Lord described by me since they are composed of matter.
Commentary

Śukadeva condemns these two forms which are imposed on the form of the Lord for purposes of worship. Dual case indicates the oneness of the gross and subtle forms of the universe (samaṣṭi) and its coverings (mahā-samaṣṭi). The wise do not accept these two forms as the object of attainment, but only as forms for worship at the beginning stage, since they are made of māyā. Even the very subtle form, the cause of the others, is material. Those who are wise, the pure devotees (vipaścitaḥ), do not accept these forms even at the first stage. They accept the forms of Rāma, Kṛṣṇa, and Nṛsiṁha made of śuddha-sattva in the stages of sādhana and perfection.

Related verses
Pure devotees who know the Lord don't accept either the gross universal form or the subtle unmanifested form as final. Pantheism and monism map onto these two; bhakti goes beyond both. The devotee knows the actual position.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I unconsciously settled for pantheism or monism instead of the personal Lord?
  • What in me resists going past either picture to a personal relationship?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.36

↗
स वाच्यवाचकतया भगवान् ब्रह्मरूपधृक् । नामरूपक्रिया धत्ते सकर्माकर्मक: पर: ॥ ३६ ॥
sa vācya-vācakatayā
[sa vaachya-vaachakatayaa]
bhagavān brahma-rūpa-dhṛk
[bhagavaan brahma-roopa-dhrik]
nāma-rūpa-kriyā dhatte
[naama-roopa-kriyaa dhatte]
sakarmākarmakaḥ paraḥ
[sakarmaakarmakah parah]
saḥ — He vācya — by His forms and activities vācakatayā — by His transcendental qualities and entourage bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead brahma — absolute rūpa-dhṛk — by accepting visible forms nāma — name rūpa — form kriyā — pastimes dhatte — accepts sa-karma — engaged in work akarmakaḥ — without being affected paraḥ — transcendence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vācya-vācakatayā
saḥ
He
vācya
by His forms and activities
vācakatayā
by His transcendental qualities and entourage
bhagavān brahma-rūpa-dhṛk
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
brahma
absolute
rūpa-dhṛk
by accepting visible forms
nāma-rūpa-kriyā dhatte
nāma
name
rūpa
form
kriyā
pastimes
dhatte
accepts
sakarmākarmakaḥ paraḥ
sa-karma
engaged in work
akarmakaḥ
without being affected
paraḥ
transcendence.
He, the Personality of Godhead, manifests Himself in a transcendental form, being the subject of His transcendental name, quality, pastimes, entourage and transcendental variegatedness. Although He is unaffected by all such activities, He appears to be so engaged.

Whenever there is a need of material creation, the transcendental Personality of Godhead accepts forms in the material world for creation, maintenance and destruction. One should be intelligent enough to know His activities in truth and not be biased to conclude that He descends to the material world by accepting a form created by material nature. Any form accepted from the material nature has its affection for everything done in the material world. A conditioned soul who accepts a material form for undergoing a certain term of material activities is subjected to the laws of matter. But here in this verse it is clearly stated that although the forms and activities of the Lord appear to be the same as those of a conditioned soul, they are supernatural and impossible for the conditioned soul. He, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is always unaffected by such activities. In the Bhagavad-gītā (4.14) the Lord says:

na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti na me karma-phale spṛhā iti māṁ yo ’bhijānāti karmabhir na sa badhyate

The Lord is never affected by the activities which He apparently performs by His different incarnations and personalities, nor does He have any desire to achieve success by fruitive activities. The Lord is full by His different potencies of wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge and renunciation, and thus He has no reason for physical exertion like the conditioned soul. Therefore an intelligent person who can distinguish between the transcendental activities of the Lord and the activities of the conditioned souls is also not bound by the reactions of activities. The Lord as Viṣṇu, Brahmā and Śiva conducts the three modes of material nature. From Viṣṇu is born Brahmā, and from Brahmā is born Śiva. Sometimes Brahmā is a separated part of Viṣṇu, and sometimes Brahmā is Viṣṇu Himself. Thus Brahmā creates the different species of life all over the universe, which means that the Lord creates the whole manifestation either by Himself or through the agency of His authorized deputies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Mahā-viṣṇu, Bhagavān, the Supreme lord, though not performing material actions, by accepting the form of Brahmā, performed actions. He created the forms and activities for the living entities, subject to names, and as well created the names suitable for each type of body and its activities.
Commentary

Now Śukadeva describes the creation, maintenance and destruction of the individual bodies. This continues till verse 44. The puruṣaḥ who manifests mahat-tattva (saḥ), the Supreme Lord (paraḥ), thought without material actions (akarmakaḥ), accepting the form of Brahmā, taking up activities (sakarma), creating forms and activities suitable to be named (vācya) as well as names which suitably designate them (vācakatayā), for the individual jīvas existing in the universe.

He manifests in a transcendental form, with His own name, qualities, pastimes, entourage, and variety, unaffected by the activities He appears to perform. Don't reduce His incarnation to a forced material form; it is transcendental throughout.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I downgrade His incarnations to merely 'taking on a body'?
  • What changes in my devotion when I see His form as transcendental even in act?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.37-40

↗
प्रजापतीन्मनून् देवानृषीन् पितृगणान् पृथक् । सिद्धचारणगन्धर्वान् विद्याध्रासुरगुह्यकान् ॥ ३७ ॥ किन्नराप्सरसो नागान् सर्पान् किम्पुरुषान्नरान् । मातृ रक्ष:पिशाचांश्च प्रेतभूतविनायकान् ॥ ३८ ॥ कूष्माण्डोन्मादवेतालान् यातुधानान् ग्रहानपि । खगान्मृगान् पशून् वृक्षान् गिरीन्नृप सरीसृपान् ॥ ३९ ॥ द्विविधाश्चतुर्विधा येऽन्ये जलस्थलनभौकस: । कुशलाकुशला मिश्रा: कर्मणां गतयस्त्विमा: ॥ ४० ॥
prajā-patīn manūn devān
[prajaa-pateen manoon devaan]
ṛṣīn pitṛ-gaṇān pṛthak
[risheen pitri-ganaan prithak]
siddha-cāraṇa-gandharvān
[siddha-chaarana-gandharvaan]
vidyādhrāsura-guhyakān
[vidyaadhraasura-guhyakaan]
kinnarāpsaraso nāgān
[kinnaraapsaraso naagaan]
sarpān kimpuruṣān narān
[sarpaan kimpurushaan naraan]
mātṝ rakṣaḥ-piśācāṁś ca
[maatree rakshah-pishaachaamsh cha]
preta-bhūta-vināyakān
[preta-bhoota-vinaayakaan]
kūṣmāṇḍonmāda-vetālān
[kooshmaandonmaada-vetaalaan]
yātudhānān grahān api
[yaatudhaanaan grahaan api]
khagān mṛgān paśūn vṛkṣān
[khagaan mrigaan pashoon vrikshaan]
girīn nṛpa sarīsṛpān
[gireen nripa sareesripaan]
dvi-vidhāś catur-vidhā ye ’nye
[dvi-vidhaash chatur-vidhaa ye ’nye]
jala-sthala-nabhaukasaḥ
[jala-sthala-nabhaukasah]
kuśalākuśalā miśrāḥ
[kushalaakushalaa mishraah]
karmaṇāṁ gatayas tv imāḥ
[karmanaam gatayas tv imaah]
prajā-patīn — Brahmā and his sons like Dakṣa and others manūn — the periodical heads like Vaivasvata Manu devān — like Indra, Candra and Varuṇa ṛṣīn — like Bhṛgu and Vasiṣṭha pitṛ-gaṇān — the inhabitants of the Pitā planets pṛthak — separately siddha — the inhabitants of the Siddha planet cāraṇa — the inhabitants of the Cāraṇa planet gandharvān — the inhabitants of the Gandharva planets vidyādhra — the inhabitants of the Vidyādhara planet asura — the atheists guhyakān — the inhabitants of the Yakṣa planet kinnara — the inhabitants of the Kinnara planet apsarasaḥ — the beautiful angels of the Apsarā planet nāgān — the serpentine inhabitants of Nāgaloka sarpān — the inhabitants of Sarpaloka (snakes) kimpuruṣān — the monkey-shaped inhabitants of the Kimpuruṣa planet narān — the inhabitants of earth mātṝ — the inhabitants of Mātṛloka rakṣaḥ — the inhabitants of the demoniac planet piśācān — the inhabitants of Piśācaloka ca — also preta — the inhabitants of Pretaloka bhūta — the evil spirits vināyakān — the goblins kūṣmāṇḍa — will-o’-the-wisp unmāda — lunatics vetālān — the jinn yātudhānān — a particular type of evil spirit grahān — the good and evil stars api — also khagān — the birds mṛgān — the forest animals paśūn — the household animals vṛkṣān — the ghosts girīn — the mountains nṛpa — O King sarīsṛpān — reptiles dvi-vidhāḥ — the moving and the standing living entities catuḥ-vidhāḥ — living entities born from embryos, eggs, perspiration and seeds ye — others anye — all jala — water sthala — land nabha-okasaḥ — birds kuśala — in happiness akuśalāḥ — in distress miśrāḥ — in mixed happiness and distress karmaṇām — according to one’s own past deeds gatayaḥ — as result of tu — but imāḥ — all of them.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prajā-patīn manūn devān
prajā-patīn
Brahmā and his sons like Dakṣa and others
manūn
the periodical heads like Vaivasvata Manu
devān
like Indra, Candra and Varuṇa
ṛṣīn pitṛ-gaṇān pṛthak
ṛṣīn
like Bhṛgu and Vasiṣṭha
pitṛ-gaṇān
the inhabitants of the Pitā planets
pṛthak
separately
siddha-cāraṇa-gandharvān
siddha
the inhabitants of the Siddha planet
cāraṇa
the inhabitants of the Cāraṇa planet
gandharvān
the inhabitants of the Gandharva planets
vidyādhrāsura-guhyakān
vidyādhra
the inhabitants of the Vidyādhara planet
asura
the atheists
guhyakān
the inhabitants of the Yakṣa planet
kinnarāpsaraso nāgān
kinnara
the inhabitants of the Kinnara planet
apsarasaḥ
the beautiful angels of the Apsarā planet
nāgān
the serpentine inhabitants of Nāgaloka
sarpān kimpuruṣān narān
sarpān
the inhabitants of Sarpaloka (snakes)
kimpuruṣān
the monkey-shaped inhabitants of the Kimpuruṣa planet
narān
the inhabitants of earth
mātṝ rakṣaḥ-piśācāṁś ca
mātṝ
the inhabitants of Mātṛloka
rakṣaḥ
the inhabitants of the demoniac planet
piśācān
the inhabitants of Piśācaloka
ca
also
preta-bhūta-vināyakān
preta
the inhabitants of Pretaloka
bhūta
the evil spirits
vināyakān
the goblins
kūṣmāṇḍonmāda-vetālān
kūṣmāṇḍa
will-o’-the-wisp
yātudhānān grahān api
khagān mṛgān paśūn vṛkṣān
unmāda
lunatics
vetālān
the jinn
girīn nṛpa sarīsṛpān
dvi-vidhāś catur-vidhā ye ’nye
jala-sthala-nabhaukasaḥ
kuśalākuśalā miśrāḥ
karmaṇāṁ gatayas tv imāḥ
yātudhānān
a particular type of evil spirit
grahān
the good and evil stars
api
also
khagān
the birds
mṛgān
the forest animals
paśūn
the household animals
vṛkṣān
the ghosts
girīn
the mountains
nṛpa
O King
sarīsṛpān
reptiles
dvi-vidhāḥ
the moving and the standing living entities
catuḥ-vidhāḥ
living entities born from embryos, eggs, perspiration and seeds
ye
others
anye
all
jala
water
sthala
land
nabha-okasaḥ
birds
kuśala
in happiness
akuśalāḥ
in distress
miśrāḥ
in mixed happiness and distress
karmaṇām
according to one’s own past deeds
gatayaḥ
as result of
tu
but
imāḥ
all of them.
O King, know from me that all living entities are created by the Supreme Lord according to their past deeds. This includes Brahmā and his sons like Dakṣa, the periodical heads like Vaivasvata Manu, the demigods like Indra, Candra and Varuṇa, the great sages like Bhṛgu, Vyāsa and Vasiṣṭha, the inhabitants of Pitṛloka and Siddhaloka, the Cāraṇas, Gandharvas, Vidyādharas, Asuras, Yakṣas, Kinnaras and angels, the serpentines, the monkey-shaped Kimpuruṣas, the human beings, the inhabitants of Mātṛloka, the demons, Piśācas, ghosts, spirits, lunatics and evil spirits, the good and evil stars, the goblins, the animals in the forest, the birds, the household animals, the reptiles, the mountains, the moving and standing living entities, the living entities born from embryos, from eggs, from perspiration and from seeds, and all others, whether they be in the water, land or sky, in happiness, in distress or in mixed happiness and distress. All of them, according to their past deeds, are created by the Supreme Lord.

The varieties of living entities are mentioned in this list, and, with no exception from the topmost planet down to the lowest planet of the universe, all of them in different species of life are created by the Almighty Father, Viṣṇu. Therefore no one is independent of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In the Bhagavad-gītā (14.4) the Lord therefore claims all living entities as His offspring in the following verse:

sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya mūrtayaḥ sambhavanti yāḥ tāsāṁ brahma mahad yonir ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā

The material nature is compared to the mother. Although every living being is seen to come out of the mother’s body, it is still a fact that the mother is not the ultimate cause of such a birth. The father is the ultimate cause of birth. Without the father’s seed, no mother can give birth to a child. Therefore the living beings in different varieties of forms and positions within the innumerable universes are all born of the seeds of the Almighty Father, the Personality of Godhead, and only to the man with a poor fund of knowledge do they appear to be born of the material nature. Being under the material energy of the Supreme Lord, all living entities beginning from Brahmā down to the insignificant ant are manifested in different bodies according to their past deeds.

The material nature is one of the energies of the Lord ( Bg. 7.4 ). The material nature is inferior in comparison to the living entities, the superior nature. The superior nature and inferior nature of the Lord combine to manifest all universal affairs.

Some of the living entities are relatively happy in better conditions of life, whereas others are in distressed conditions of life. But factually, none of them are actually happy in material conditional life. No one can be happy in prison life, although one may be a first-class prisoner and another a third-class prisoner. The intelligent person should not try to be promoted from third-class prison life to first-class prison life, but should try to be released from the prison altogether. One may be promoted to first-class prisoner, but the same first-class prisoner is again degraded to a third-class prisoner in the next term. One should try to be free from prison life and go back home, back to Godhead. That is the real goal for all types of living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā created the Prajāpatis, the Manus, the devatās, the sages, the Pitṛs, the Siddhas, Caraṇas, Gandharvas, Vidhādharas, Asuras, Guhyakas (guardians of Kuvera), Kinnaras, Apsaras, Nāgas, Sarpas, Kimpuruṣas, Uragas, Mātṛs, Rakṣasas, Piśācas, Pretas, Bhūtas, Vināyakas, Kūṣmāṇḍas, Unmādas, Vetālas, Yātudhānas, [Note: Some of these species are described in the footnote to 2.6.43-46.] Grahas, birds, wild and domestic animals, trees, mountains and reptiles, and as well various living beings of two types, four types and three types.
Commentary

These forms are now listed. The list is the object of the verb from the previous sentence. O King! Brahmā created the Prajāpatis. The created beings with two types of bodies are the non-moving and moving bodies. He created other forms. He created bodies of four types: those born from the womb, from eggs, from perspiration and sprouting from seeds. The three types are those dwelling in the water, on land and in the air.

Related verses
All living beings — Brahmā, Manus, demigods, sages, ancestors, siddhas, gandharvas, men, beasts — are created by the Lord according to their past deeds. No one is independent of His authorship. Mother nature is womb; He is Father.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I treat material nature as the ultimate cause and forget the Father?
  • How does seeing my creation as authored by past deeds change my view of my circumstances?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.41

↗
सत्त्वं रजस्तम इति तिस्र: सुरनृनारका: । तत्राप्येकैकशो राजन् भिद्यन्ते गतयस्त्रिधा । यदैकैकतरोऽन्याभ्यां स्वभाव उपहन्यते ॥ ४१ ॥
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti
[sattvam rajas tama iti]
tisraḥ sura-nṛ-nārakāḥ
[tisrah sura-nri-naarakaah]
tatrāpy ekaikaśo rājan
[tatraapy ekaikasho raajan]
bhidyante gatayas tridhā
[bhidyante gatayas tridhaa]
yadaikaikataro ’nyābhyāṁ
[yadaikaikataro ’nyaabhyaam]
sva-bhāva upahanyate
[sva-bhaava upahanyate]
sattvam — the mode of goodness rajaḥ — the mode of passion tamaḥ — the mode of darkness iti — thus tisraḥ — the three sura — demigod nṛ — human being nārakāḥ — one who is suffering hellish conditions tatra api — even there ekaikaśaḥ — another rājan — O King bhidyante — divide into gatayaḥ — movements tridhā — three yadā — at that time ekaikataraḥ — one in relation with another anyābhyām — from the other sva-bhāvaḥ — habit upahanyate — develops.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti
sattvam
the mode of goodness
rajaḥ
the mode of passion
tamaḥ
the mode of darkness
iti
thus
tisraḥ sura-nṛ-nārakāḥ
tisraḥ
the three
sura
demigod
nṛ
human being
nārakāḥ
one who is suffering hellish conditions
tatrāpy ekaikaśo rājan
tatra api
even there
ekaikaśaḥ
another
rājan
O King
bhidyante gatayas tridhā
bhidyante
divide into
gatayaḥ
movements
tridhā
three
yadaikaikataro ’nyābhyāṁ
yadā
at that time
ekaikataraḥ
one in relation with another
sva-bhāva upahanyate
anyābhyām
from the other
sva-bhāvaḥ
habit
upahanyate
develops.
According to the different modes of material nature — the mode of goodness, the mode of passion and the mode of darkness — there are different living creatures, who are known as demigods, human beings and hellish living entities. O King, even a particular mode of nature, being mixed with the other two, is divided into three, and thus each kind of living creature is influenced by the other modes and acquires its habits also.

The living entities individually are being conducted by a particular mode of nature, but at the same time there is every chance of their being influenced by the other two. Generally, all conditioned souls in the material encagement are influenced by the mode of passion because every one of them is trying to lord it over the material nature to fulfill his individual desire. But in spite of the individual mode of passion, there is always the chance of being influenced by the other modes of nature by association. If one is in good association he can develop the mode of goodness, and if in bad association he may develop the mode of darkness or ignorance. Nothing is stereotyped. One can change his habit by good or bad association, and one has to become intelligent enough to discriminate between good and bad. The best association is the service of the devotees of the Lord, and by that association one can become the highest qualified man by the grace of the Lord’s pure devotees. As we have already seen in the life of Śrīla Nārada Muni, he became the topmost devotee of the Lord simply by the association of pure devotees of the Lord. By birth he was the son of a maidservant and had no knowledge of his father and no academic education, even of the lowest status. But simply by associating with the devotees and by eating the remnants of their foodstuff, he gradually developed the transcendental qualities of the devotees. By such association, his taste for chanting and hearing the transcendental glories of the Lord became prominent, and because the glories of the Lord are nondifferent from the Lord, he got direct association with the Lord by means of sound representation. Similarly, there is the life of Ajāmila (Sixth Canto), who was the son of a brāhmaṇa and was educated and trained properly in the discharge of the duties of a brāhmaṇa, but who in spite of all this, because he contacted the bad association of a prostitute, was put into the path of the lowest quality of caṇḍāla, or the last position for a human being. Therefore the Bhāgavatam always recommends the association of the mahat, or the great soul, for opening the gate of salvation. To associate with persons engaged in lording it over the material world means to enter into the darkest region of hell. One should try to raise himself by the association of the great soul. That is the way of the perfection of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The results of action are good, bad and mixed. Because of the guṇas of sattva, rajas and tamas, men become devatās, humans and inhabitants of hell. O King! These three types of beings are again divided into three when each nature is mixed with the other two guṇas.
Commentary

How did he create these beings? The results of actions are three: those giving good results (kuśala), those giving suffering (akuśalā) and those giving mixed results (miśrāḥ). This indicates that the jīvas attain these results according to their individual actions. There is no fault in the creator. This is the answer to the question that Parīkṣit asked, “O brāhmaṇa! Speak about the progress of time with large and small divisions and the number and types of destinations achieved by action.” (SB 2.8.13) The cause of these results is guṇas. The result of sattva is devatā body. The result of rajas is human body. The result of tamas is hellish existence. These three results are subdivided into three each, to make nine results. Each of the three is mixed with each of the other two. Thus a human with rajas, by a mixture with a great amount of sattva becomes a brāhmaṇa and by mixture with a great amount of tamas becomes a śūdra.

Related verses
Beings are classed by goodness, passion, or darkness — demigods, humans, hellish. But each mode is mixed with the others, so nothing is stereotyped. Good association raises you; bad association lowers you. The category is fluid.
Reflection Questions
  • Which mode is my current company nudging me into?
  • What single association could I shift to move toward goodness?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.42

↗
स एवेदं जगद्धाता भगवान् धर्मरूपधृक् । पुष्णाति स्थापयन् विश्वं तिर्यङ्‍नरसुरादिभि: ॥ ४२ ॥
sa evedaṁ jagad-dhātā
[sa evedam jagad-dhaataa]
bhagavān dharma-rūpa-dhṛk
[bhagavaan dharma-roopa-dhrik]
puṣṇāti sthāpayan viśvaṁ
[pushnaati sthaapayan vishvam]
tiryaṅ-nara-surādibhiḥ
[tiryan-nara-suraadibhih]
saḥ — He eva — certainly idam — this jagat-dhātā — the maintainer of the entire universe bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead dharma-rūpa-dhṛk — assuming the form of religious principles puṣṇāti — maintains sthāpayan — after establishing viśvam — the universes tiryak — living entities lower than the human beings nara — the human beings sura-ādibhiḥ — by the demigodly incarnations.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa evedaṁ jagad-dhātā
saḥ
He
eva
certainly
idam
this
jagat-dhātā
the maintainer of the entire universe
bhagavān dharma-rūpa-dhṛk
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
dharma-rūpa-dhṛk
assuming the form of religious principles
puṣṇāti sthāpayan viśvaṁ
puṣṇāti
maintains
sthāpayan
after establishing
viśvam
the universes
tiryaṅ-nara-surādibhiḥ
tiryak
living entities lower than the human beings
nara
the human beings
sura-ādibhiḥ
by the demigodly incarnations.
He, the Personality of Godhead, as the maintainer of all in the universe, appears in different incarnations after establishing the creation, and thus He reclaims all kinds of conditioned souls amongst the humans, the nonhumans and the demigods.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead Viṣṇu incarnates Himself in different societies of living entities to reclaim them from the clutches of illusion, and such activities of the Lord are not limited only to human society. He incarnates Himself even as a fish, hog, tree and many other forms, but less intelligent persons who have no knowledge of Him deride Him even if He is in human society as a human being. The Lord therefore says in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) :

avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam paraṁ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram

As we have already discussed in the previous verses, it is concluded that the Lord is never a product of the material creation. His transcendental position is always unchanged. He is the eternal form of knowledge and bliss, and He executes His almighty will by His different energies. As such, He is never the subject of reactions for any of His acts. He is transcendental to all such conceptions of actions and reactions. Even if He is visible in the material world, the exhibition is only of His internal energy, for He is above the good and bad conceptions of this material world. In the material world the fish or the hog may be considered lower than the man, but when the Lord appears as a fish or hog, He is neither of them in the material conception. It is His causeless mercy that He appears in every society or species of life, but He is never to be considered one of them. Conceptions of the material world such as good and bad, lower and upper, important and insignificant, are estimations of the material energy, and the Supreme Lord is transcendental to all such conceptions. The words paraṁ bhāvam, or transcendental nature, can never be compared to the material conception. We should not forget that the potencies of the Almighty Lord are always the same and do not decrease because the Lord assumes the form of a lower animal. There is no difference between Lord Śrī Rāma, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and His incarnations as a fish and hog. He is all-pervading and simultaneously localized at any and every place. But the foolish person with a poor fund of knowledge, for want of that paraṁ bhāvam of the Lord, cannot understand how the Supreme Lord can take the form of a man or a fish. One compares everything to one’s own standard of knowledge, as the frog in the well considers the sea to be like the well. The frog in the well cannot even think of the sea, and when such a frog is informed of the greatness of the sea, it takes the conception of the sea as being a little greater than the well. As such, one who is foolish about the transcendental science of the Lord will find it difficult to understand how Lord Viṣṇu can equally manifest Himself in every society of living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The maintainer of the universe, Bhagavān, accepting the form of Viṣṇu, establishing this universe, maintains it with the animals, men and human beings expressing their own natures of maintenance.
Commentary

Dharma here means Viṣṇu. From dharma there is preservation of the universe, and from lack of dharma there is destruction. The creation is endowed with dharma and adharma. The birds and beasts protect themselves, their offspring, friends and family by their nature.

The Lord incarnates not only in human form but as fish, hog, tree — reclaiming conditioned souls in every society. Less intelligent humans deride Him when He looks human; but He is never a product of matter, only transcendental potency.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose form of God do I quietly find too 'lowly' to honor?
  • Where am I deriding rather than recognizing because the form doesn't match my expectation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.43

↗
तत: कालाग्निरुद्रात्मा यत्सृष्टमिदमात्मन: । संनियच्छति तत् काले घनानीकमिवानिल: ॥ ४३ ॥
tataḥ kālāgni-rudrātmā
[tatah kaalaagni-rudraatmaa]
yat sṛṣṭam idam ātmanaḥ
[yat srishtam idam aatmanah]
sanniyacchati tat kāle
[sanniyachchati tat kaale]
ghanānīkam ivānilaḥ
[ghanaaneekam ivaanilah]
tataḥ — thereafter, at the end kāla — destruction agni — fire rudra-ātmā — in the form of Rudra yat — whatever sṛṣṭam — created idam — all these ātmanaḥ — of His own sam — completely niyacchati — annihilates tat kāle — at the end of the millennium ghana-anīkam — bunches of clouds iva — like that of anilaḥ — air.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ kālāgni-rudrātmā
tataḥ
thereafter, at the end
kāla
destruction
agni
fire
rudra-ātmā
in the form of Rudra
yat sṛṣṭam idam ātmanaḥ
yat
whatever
sṛṣṭam
created
idam
all these
ātmanaḥ
of His own
sanniyacchati tat kāle
sam
completely
niyacchati
annihilates
tat kāle
at the end of the millennium
ghanānīkam ivānilaḥ
ghana-anīkam
bunches of clouds
iva
like that of
anilaḥ
air.
Thereafter, at the end of the millennium, the Lord Himself in the form of Rudra, the destroyer, will annihilate the complete creation as the wind displaces the clouds.

This creation is very appropriately compared to clouds. Clouds are created or situated in the sky, and when they are displaced they remain in the same sky without manifestation. Similarly, the whole creation is made by the Supreme Personality of Godhead in His form of Brahmā, it is maintained by Him in the form of Viṣṇu, and it is destroyed by Him in the form of Rudra, or Śiva, all in due course. This creation, maintenance and destruction are nicely explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.19-20) as follows:

bhūta-grāmaḥ sa evāyaṁ bhūtvā bhūtvā pralīyate rātry-āgame ’vaśaḥ pārtha prabhavaty ahar-āgame

paras tasmāt tu bhāvo ’nyo ’vyakto ’vyaktāt sanātanaḥ yaḥ sa sarveṣu bhūteṣu naśyatsu na vinaśyati

The nature of the material world is that it is first created very nicely, then it develops very nicely and stays for a great number of years (even beyond the calculation of the greatest mathematician), but after that it is again destroyed during the night of Brahmā, without any resistance, and at the end of the night of Brahmā it is again manifested as a creation to follow the same principles of maintenance and destruction.

The foolish conditioned soul who has taken this temporary world as a permanent settlement has to learn intelligently why such creation and destruction take place. The fruitive actors in the material world are very enthusiastic in the creation of big enterprises, big houses, big empires, big industries and so many big, big things out of the energy and ingredients supplied by the material agent of the Supreme Lord. With such resources, and at the cost of valuable energy, the conditioned soul creates, satisfies his whims, but unwillingly has to depart from all his creations and enter into another phase of life to create again and again. To give hope to such foolish conditioned souls who waste their energy in this temporary material world, the Lord gives information that there is another nature, which is eternally existent without being occasionally created or destroyed, and that the conditioned soul can understand what he should do and how his valuable energy may be utilized. Instead of wasting his energy in matter, which is sure to be destroyed in due course by the supreme will, the conditioned soul should utilize his energy in the devotional service of the Lord so that he can be transferred to the other, eternal nature, where there is no birth, no death, no creation, no destruction, but permanent life instead, full of knowledge and unlimited bliss. The temporary creation is thus exhibited and destroyed just to give information to the conditioned soul who is attached to temporary things. It is also meant to give him a chance for self-realization, and not for sense gratification, which is the prime aim of all fruitive actors.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then the Lord, Kālāgni Rudra, destroys this universe which he alone created by time energy, just as the wind destroys a mass of clouds.
Commentary

The Lord destroys whatever he has created. Ghanānīkam means “all the clouds.”

At the millennium's end the Lord as Rudra annihilates everything, as wind displaces clouds. Creation, maintenance, destruction — one Person in three roles. The dissolution is not a tragedy but a phase.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I treat the small dissolutions of my own life as tragedies, or as phases of one larger arrangement?
  • How does seeing Rudra as the same Person as Viṣṇu and Brahmā steady me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.44

↗
इत्थंभावेन कथितो भगवान् भगवत्तम: । नेत्थंभावेन हि परं द्रष्टुमर्हन्ति सूरय: ॥ ४४ ॥
ittham-bhāvena kathito
[ittham-bhaavena kathito]
bhagavān bhagavattamaḥ
[bhagavaan bhagavattamah]
nettham-bhāvena hi paraṁ
[nettham-bhaavena hi param]
draṣṭum arhanti sūrayaḥ
[drashtum arhanti soorayah]
ittham — in these features bhāvena — the matter of creation and destruction kathitaḥ — described bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead bhagavat-tamaḥ — by the great transcendentalists na — not ittham — in this bhāvena — features hi — only param — most glorious draṣṭum — to see arhanti — deserve sūrayaḥ — great devotees.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ittham-bhāvena kathito
ittham
in these features
bhāvena
the matter of creation and destruction
kathitaḥ
described
bhagavān bhagavattamaḥ
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
bhagavat-tamaḥ
by the great transcendentalists
nettham-bhāvena hi paraṁ
na
not
ittham
in this
bhāvena
features
hi
only
param
most glorious
draṣṭum arhanti sūrayaḥ
draṣṭum
to see
arhanti
deserve
sūrayaḥ
great devotees.
The great transcendentalists thus describe the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but the pure devotees deserve to see more glorious things in transcendence, beyond these features.

The Lord is not only the creator and destroyer of the material manifestations of His different energies. He is more than a simple creator and destroyer, for there is His feature of ānanda, or His pleasure feature. This pleasure feature of the Lord is understood by the pure devotees only, and not by others. The impersonalist is satisfied simply by understanding the all-pervasive influence of the Lord. This is called Brahman realization. Greater than the impersonalist is the mystic who sees the Lord situated in his heart as Paramātmā, the partial representation of the Lord. But there are pure devotees who take part in the direct pleasure ( ānanda ) potency of the Lord by factual reciprocation of loving service. The Lord in His abode called the Vaikuṇṭha planets, which are eternal manifestations, always remains with His associates and enjoys transcendental loving services by His pure devotees in different transcendental humors. The pure devotees of the Lord thus undergo a practice of that devotional service to the Lord during the manifestation of the creation and take full advantage of the manifestation by qualifying themselves to enter into the kingdom of God. The Bhagavad-gītā (18.55) confirms this:

bhaktyā mām abhijānāti yāvān yaś cāsmi tattvataḥ tato māṁ tattvato jñātvā viśate tad anantaram

By development of pure devotional service one can factually know the Lord as He is and thus be trained in the bona fide service of the Lord and be allowed to enter into the direct association of the Lord in so many capacities. The highest glorious association with the Lord is made possible in the planet of Goloka Vṛndāvana, where Lord Kṛṣṇa enjoys Himself with the gopīs and His favorite animals, the surabhi cows. A description of this transcendental land of Kṛṣṇa is given in the Brahma-saṁhitā, which is considered by Lord Śrī Caitanya to be the most authentic literature in this connection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord has been described in many scriptures as the creator of the universe. Some pure devotees however do not see him only as the creator of the universe.
Commentary

The Lord is described as the creator (ittham-bhāvena) in such statements as tasmād vā etasmād ātmana ākāśaḥ sambhūtaḥ: then from the Lord ether arose (Taittirīya Upaniṣad 2.1.3); so ’kāmayata bahu syāṁ prajāyeya: he desired “May I become many, may I expand in growth.” (Taittirīya Upaniṣad 2.6) Some pure devotees however do not see the Lord only as the creator of the universe, but also as the person who enjoys activities with his devotees in his spiritual abodes such as Vaikuṇṭha.

Transcendentalists describe creation and destruction; pure devotees see beyond these features to ānanda — the Lord's pleasure potency. Bhakti enters not just His operations but His delight. Don't stop at function; reach for joy.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I reduced God to His functions and lost His ānanda?
  • What act today could I do as participation in His pleasure rather than as duty?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.45

↗
नास्य कर्मणि जन्मादौ परस्यानुविधीयते । कर्तृत्वप्रतिषेधार्थं माययारोपितं हि तत् ॥ ४५ ॥
nāsya karmaṇi janmādau
[naasya karmani janmaadau]
parasyānuvidhīyate
[parasyaanuvidheeyate]
kartṛtva-pratiṣedhārthaṁ
[kartritva-pratishedhaartham]
māyayāropitaṁ hi tat
[maayayaaropitam hi tat]
na — never asya — of the creation karmaṇi — in the matter of janma-ādau — creation and destruction parasya — of the Supreme anuvidhīyate — it is so described kartṛtva — engineering pratiṣedha-artham — counteract māyayā — by the external energy āropitam — is manifested hi — for tat — the creator.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāsya karmaṇi janmādau
na
never
asya
of the creation
karmaṇi
in the matter of
janma-ādau
creation and destruction
parasyānuvidhīyate
parasya
of the Supreme
anuvidhīyate
it is so described
kartṛtva-pratiṣedhārthaṁ
kartṛtva
engineering
pratiṣedha-artham
counteract
māyayāropitaṁ hi tat
māyayā
by the external energy
āropitam
is manifested
hi
for
tat
the creator.
There is no direct engineering by the Lord for the creation and destruction of the material world. What is described in the Vedas about His direct interference is simply to counteract the idea that material nature is the creator.

The Vedic direction for the creation, maintenance and destruction of the material world is this: yato vā imāni bhūtāni jāyante; yena jātāni jīvanti; yat prayanty abhisaṁviśanti — i.e., everything is created by Brahman, after creation everything is maintained by Brahman, and after annihilation everything is conserved in Brahman. Gross materialists without any knowledge of Brahman, Paramātmā or Bhagavān conclude material nature to be the ultimate cause of the material manifestation, and the modern scientist also shares this view that the material nature is the ultimate cause of all the manifestations of the material world. This view is refuted by all Vedic literature. The Vedānta philosophy mentions that Brahman is the fountainhead of all creation, maintenance and destruction, and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the natural commentation on the Vedānta philosophy, says, janmādy asya yato ’nvayād itarataś cārtheṣv abhijñaḥ svarāṭ, etc.

Inert matter is undoubtedly energy with potential to interact, but it has no initiative of its own. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam therefore comments on the aphorism janmādy asya by saying abhijñaḥ and svarāṭ, i.e., the Supreme Brahman is not inert matter, but He is supreme consciousness and is independent. Therefore inert matter cannot be the ultimate cause of the creation, maintenance and destruction of the material world. Superficially material nature appears to be the cause of creation, maintenance and destruction, but material nature is set into motion for creation by the supreme conscious being, the Personality of Godhead. He is the background of all creation, maintenance and destruction, and this is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.10) :

mayādhyakṣeṇa prakṛtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram hetunānena kaunteya jagad viparivartate

The material nature is one of the energies of the Lord, and she can work under the direction of the Lord ( adhyakṣeṇa ). When the Lord throws His transcendental glance over the material nature, then only can the material nature act, as a father contacts the mother, who is then able to conceive a child. Although it appears to the layman that the mother gives birth to the child, the experienced man knows that the father gives birth to the child. The material nature therefore produces the moving and standing manifestations of the material world after being contacted by the supreme father, and not independently. Considering material nature to be the cause of creation, maintenance, etc., is called “the logic of nipples on the neck of a goat.” The Caitanya-caritāmṛta by Śrīla Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja Gosvāmī describes this logic of ajā-gala-stana-nyāya as follows (as explained by His Divine Grace Śrī Śrīmad Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Gosvāmī Mahārāja): “The material nature, as the material cause, is known as pradhāna, and as the efficient cause is known as māyā. But since it is inert matter, it is not the remote cause of creation.” Kavirāja Gosvāmī states as follows:

ataeva kṛṣṇa mūla-jagat-kāraṇa prakṛti — kāraṇa yaiche ajā-gala-stana

( Cc. Ādi 5.61)

Because Kāraṇārṇavaśāyī Viṣṇu is a plenary expansion of Kṛṣṇa, it is He who electrifies the matter to put it in motion. The example of electrification is quite appropriate. A piece of iron is certainly not fire, but when the iron is made red-hot, certainly it has the quality of fire through its burning capacity. Matter is compared to the piece of iron, and it is electrified or made red-hot by the glance or manipulation of the supreme consciousness of Viṣṇu. Only by such electrification is the energy of matter displayed in various actions and reactions. Therefore the inert matter is neither efficient nor the material cause of the cosmic manifestation. Śrī Kapiladeva has said:

yatholmukād visphuliṅgād dhūmād vāpi sva-sambhavāt apy ātmatvenābhimatād yathāgniḥ pṛthag ulmukāt

( Bhāg. 3.28.40 )

The original fire, its flame, its sparks and its smoke are all one, for fire is still fire yet is different from the flame, flame is different from sparks, and sparks are different from the smoke. In every one of them, namely in the flames, in the sparks and in the smoke, the integrity of fire is present, yet all of them are differently situated with different positions. The cosmic manifestation is compared to the smoke because when smoke passes over the sky so many forms appear, resembling many known and unknown manifestations. The sparks are compared to living entities, and the flames are compared to material nature ( pradhāna ). One must know that each and every one of them is effective simply because of being empowered by the quality of the original fire. Therefore all of them, namely the material nature, the cosmic manifestation and the living entities, are but different energies of the Lord (fire). Therefore those who accept the material nature as the cosmic manifestation’s original cause ( prakṛti, the cause of creation according to Sāṅkhya philosophy) are not correct in their conclusion. The material nature has no separate existence without the Lord. Therefore, setting aside the Supreme Lord as the cause of all causes is the logic of ajā-gala-stana-nyāya, or trying to milk the nipples on the neck of a goat. The nipples on the neck of a goat may seem like sources of milk, but to try to get milk from such nipples will be foolish.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord does not carry out the activities of creation, maintenance and destruction of the universe directly. His direct involvement is denied everywhere in the scriptures. The activities performed by māyā are ascribed to him.
Commentary

This is actually not the activity of the Lord. In creating, maintaining and destroying the universe (asya) the Supreme Lord is not the doer. It is described everywhere in the scriptures (anuvidhīyate) that he is not the doer, because (hi) the creation, maintenance and destruction carried out by māyā, the external energy, through actions of the guṇas, is ascribed to the Lord. Though it is done by me, since I am the Supreme Lord, it is not actually done by me in my svarūpa. That is the meaning. Thus śruti says niṣkalaṁ niṣkriyaṁ śāntaṁ niravadyaṁ nirañjanam: the Lord is without divisions, without action, undisturbed, without fault, without contamination. (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.19)

Related verses
The Vedic statements about the Lord's direct creation are mainly to refute the materialist who says nature alone is the cause. Nature is His agency, not the prime cause. The bare statement of His direct interference exists to correct error.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I drifted into thinking 'material nature' is the deepest cause?
  • Where would the corrective view of 'He is behind nature' change my reasoning?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.46

↗
अयं तु ब्रह्मण: कल्प: सविकल्प उदाहृत: । विधि: साधारणो यत्र सर्गा: प्राकृतवैकृता: ॥ ४६ ॥
ayaṁ tu brahmaṇaḥ kalpaḥ
[ayam tu brahmanah kalpah]
savikalpa udāhṛtaḥ
[savikalpa udaahritah]
vidhiḥ sādhāraṇo yatra
[vidhih saadhaarano yatra]
sargāḥ prākṛta-vaikṛtāḥ
[sargaah praakrita-vaikritaah]
ayam — this process of creation and annihilation tu — but brahmaṇaḥ — of Brahmā kalpaḥ — his one day sa-vikalpaḥ — along with the duration of the universes udāhṛtaḥ — exemplified vidhiḥ — regulative principles sādhāraṇaḥ — in summary yatra — wherein sargāḥ — creation prākṛta — in the matter of material nature vaikṛtāḥ — disbursement.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ayaṁ tu brahmaṇaḥ kalpaḥ
ayam
this process of creation and annihilation
tu
but
brahmaṇaḥ
of Brahmā
kalpaḥ
his one day
savikalpa udāhṛtaḥ
sa-vikalpaḥ
along with the duration of the universes
udāhṛtaḥ
exemplified
vidhiḥ sādhāraṇo yatra
vidhiḥ
regulative principles
sādhāraṇaḥ
in summary
yatra
wherein
sargāḥ prākṛta-vaikṛtāḥ
sargāḥ
creation
prākṛta
in the matter of material nature
vaikṛtāḥ
disbursement.
This process of creation and annihilation described in summary herein is the regulative principle during the duration of Brahmā’s one day. It is also the regulative principle in the creation of mahat, in which the material nature is dispersed.

There are three different types of creation, called mahā-kalpa, vikalpa and kalpa. In the mahā-kalpa the Lord assumes the first puruṣa incarnation as Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu with all the potencies of the mahat-tattva and the sixteen principles of creative matter and instruments. The creative instruments are eleven, the ingredients are five, and all of them are products of mahat, or materialistic ego. These creations by the Lord in His feature of Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu are called mahā-kalpa. The creation of Brahmā and dispersion of the material ingredients are called vikalpa, and the creation by Brahmā in each day of his life is called kalpa. Therefore each day of Brahmā is called a kalpa, and there are thirty kalpas in terms of Brahmā’s days. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17) as follows:

sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ rātriṁ yuga-sahasrāntāṁ te ’ho-rātra-vido janāḥ

In the upper planetary system the duration of one complete day and night is equal to one complete year of this earth. This is accepted even by the modern scientist and attested by the astronauts. Similarly, in the region of still higher planetary systems the duration of day and night is still greater than in the heavenly planets. The four yugas are calculated in terms of the heavenly calendars and accordingly are twelve thousand years in terms of the heavenly planets. This is called a divya-yuga, and one thousand divya-yugas make one day of Brahmā. The creation during the day of Brahmā is called kalpa, and the creation of Brahmā is called vikalpa. When vikalpas are made possible by the breathing of Mahā-Viṣṇu, this is called a mahā-kalpa. There are regular and systematic cycles of these mahā-kalpas, vikalpas and kalpas. In answer to Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s question about them, Śukadeva Gosvāmī answered in the Prabhāsa-khaṇḍa of the Skanda Purāṇa. They are as follows:

prathamaḥ śveta-kalpaś ca dvitīyo nīla-lohitaḥ vāmadevas tṛtīyas tu tato gāthāntaro ’paraḥ

rauravaḥ pañcamaḥ proktaḥ ṣaṣṭhaḥ prāṇa iti smṛtaḥ saptamo ’tha bṛhat-kalpaḥ kandarpo ’ṣṭama ucyate

sadyotha navamaḥ kalpa īśāno daśamaḥ smṛtaḥ dhyāna ekādaśaḥ proktas tathā sārasvato ’paraḥ

trayodaśa udānas tu garuḍo ’tha caturdaśaḥ kaurmaḥ pañcadaśo jñeyaḥ paurṇamāsī prajāpateḥ

ṣoḍaśo nārasiṁhas tu samādhis tu tato ’paraḥ āgneyo viṣṇujaḥ sauraḥ soma-kalpas tato ’paraḥ

dvāviṁśo bhāvanaḥ proktaḥ supumān iti cāparaḥ vaikuṇṭhaś cārṣṭiṣas tadvad valī-kalpas tato ’paraḥ

saptaviṁśo ’tha vairājo gaurī-kalpas tathāparaḥ māheśvaras tathā proktas tripuro yatra ghātitaḥ pitṛ-kalpas tathā cānte yaḥ kuhūr brahmaṇaḥ smṛtā

Therefore the thirty kalpas of Brahmā are: (1) Śveta-kalpa, (2) Nīlalohita, (3) Vāmadeva, (4) Gāthāntara, (5) Raurava, (6) Prāṇa, (7) Bṛhat-kalpa, (8) Kandarpa, (9) Sadyotha, (10) Īśāna, (11) Dhyāna, (12) Sārasvata, (13) Udāna, (14) Garuḍa, (15) Kaurma, (16) Nārasiṁha, (17) Samādhi, (18) Āgneya, (19) Viṣṇuja, (20) Saura, (21) Soma-kalpa, (22) Bhāvana, (23) Supuma, (24) Vaikuṇṭha, (25) Arciṣa, (26) Valī-kalpa, (27) Vairāja, (28) Gaurī-kalpa, (29) Māheśvara, (30) Paitṛ-kalpa.

These are Brahmā’s days only, and he has to live months and years up to one hundred, so we can just imagine how many creations there are in kalpas only. Then again there are vikalpas, which are generated by the breathing of Mahā-Viṣṇu, as stated in the Brahma-saṁhitā ( yasyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagadaṇḍa-nāthāḥ ). The Brahmās live only during the breathing period of Mahā-Viṣṇu. So the exhaling and inhaling of Viṣṇu are mahā-kalpas, and all these are due to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for no one else is the master of all creations.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The life of Brahmā has divisions of days. The usual procedure is that the sarga creation takes place at the beginning of the life of Brahmā and the visarga creation takes place at the beginning of the day of Brahmā.
Commentary

This verse sums up the topic. The life span (kalpa) relative to Brahmā, one hundred years, is divided into days (vikalpaḥ). At the beginning of the mahā-kalpa (life of Brahmā) the creation of mahat-tattva and other elements takes place (sarga). In the day of Brahmā the visarga or creation of bodies takes place (vaikṛtāḥ). This is the usual procedure in all the mahā-kalpas and days of Brahmā. This answers in summary the another question of Parīkṣit: “Speak of the kalpas and their subdivisions, how time is perceived in the past present and future and the life spans of the humans, devatās and Pitṛs.” (SB 2.8.12)

Related verses
This cycle of creation and annihilation runs for one day of Brahmā. There are three types — mahā-kalpa, vikalpa, kalpa — each a level of cosmic rhythm. Time itself has nested layers, all under His authorship.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I let my picture of 'time' include nested layers far beyond a human lifetime?
  • How does this larger frame change what counts as urgency in my life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.47

↗
परिमाणं च कालस्य कल्पलक्षणविग्रहम् । यथा पुरस्ताद्व्याख्यास्ये पाद्मं कल्पमथो श‍ृणु ॥ ४७ ॥
parimāṇaṁ ca kālasya
[parimaanam cha kaalasya]
kalpa-lakṣaṇa-vigraham
[kalpa-lakshana-vigraham]
yathā purastād vyākhyāsye
[yathaa purastaad vyaakhyaasye]
pādmaṁ kalpam atho śṛṇu
[paadmam kalpam atho shrinu]
parimāṇam — measurement ca — also kālasya — of time kalpa — a day of Brahmā lakṣaṇa — symptoms vigraham — form yathā — as much as purastāt — hereafter vyākhyāsye — shall be explained pādmam — by the name Pādma kalpam — the duration of a day atho — thus śṛṇu — just hear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
parimāṇaṁ ca kālasya
parimāṇam
measurement
ca
also
kālasya
of time
kalpa-lakṣaṇa-vigraham
kalpa
a day of Brahmā
lakṣaṇa
symptoms
vigraham
form
yathā purastād vyākhyāsye
yathā
as much as
purastāt
hereafter
vyākhyāsye
shall be explained
pādmaṁ kalpam atho śṛṇu
pādmam
by the name Pādma
kalpam
the duration of a day
atho
thus
śṛṇu
just hear.
O King, I shall in due course explain the measurement of time in its gross and subtle features with the specific symptoms of each, but for the present let me explain unto you the Pādma-kalpa.

The present duration of a kalpa of Brahmā is called the Varāha-kalpa or Śvetavarāha-kalpa because the incarnation of the Lord as Varāha took place during the creation of Brahmā, who was born on the lotus coming out of the abdomen of Viṣṇu. Therefore this Varāha-kalpa is also called Pādma-kalpa, and this is testified by ācāryas like Jīva Gosvāmī as well as Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura in pursuance of the first commentator, Svāmī Śrīdhara. So there is no contradiction between the Varāha and the Pādma-kalpa of Brahmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I will explain later the measurement of time which takes the form of kalpas. Now hear from me about the Pādma-kalpa.
Commentary

How time is perceived, which is part of the question, will be answered in detail later. The measurement of time has a form described in terms of kalpas. Without the qualities of kalpa and other subdivisions, time cannot be measured. That will be described later (purastād) in the Third Canto. The Pādma-kalpa is included in the first half of Brahmā’s life. The list of kalpas or days of Brahmā’s month is mentioned in the Skanda Purāṇa.

prathamaḥ śveta-kalpas tu dvitīyo nīla-lohitaḥ | vāmadevas tṛtīyas tu tato gāthāntaro paraḥ || rauravaḥ pañcamaḥ proktaḥ ṣaṣṭhaḥ prāṇa iti smṛtaḥ | saptamo ’tha bṛhat-kalpaḥ kandarpo ’ṣṭama ucyate || satyo ’tha navamaḥ prokta īśāno daśamaḥ smṛtaḥ | dhyāna ekādaśaḥ proktas tathā sārasvato ’paraḥ || trayodaśa udānas tu gāruḍo ’tha caturdaśaḥ | kaurmaḥ pañcadaśo jñeyaḥ paurṇamāsī prajāpateḥ || ṣoḍaśo nārasiṁhas tu samādhis tu tato ’paraḥ | āgneyo viṣṇujaḥ sauraḥ soma-kalpas tato ’paraḥ || dvāviṁśo bhāvanaḥ proktaḥ supumān iti cāparaḥ | vaikuṇṭhaś cārciṣas tadvat vallī-kalpas tato ’paraḥ || saptaviṁśo ’tha vairājo gaurī-kalpas tathāparaḥ | māheśvaras tathā proktas tripuro yatra ghātitaḥ || pitṛ-kalpas tathā cānte yaḥ kuhūr brahmaṇaḥ smṛtaḥ | triṁśat kalpāḥ samākhyātā brahmaṇo divasaiḥ sadā || atītāś ca bhaviṣyāś ca vārāho vartate ’dhunā | pratipad brahmaṇaḥ proktā dvitīyārdhasya sāmpratam ||

The first day of the month is called Śveta-kalpa. The second is Nīla-lohita. The third is Vāmadeva and the fourth is called Gāthāntara. The fifth is Raurava, the sixth is Prāṇa. The seventh is Bṛhat and the eighth is Kandarpa. The ninth is Savya and the tenth is Īśāna. The eleventh is Dhyāna and the twelfth is Sārasvata. The thirteenth is Udāna and the fourtheen is Garuḍa. The fifteenth is Kaurma. This is the full moon of Brahmā. The sixteenth day is Nārasiṁha and the seventeenth is Samādhi. The eighteenth is Āgneya and the nineteenth is Viṣṇuja. The twentieth is Saura and the twenty-first day is called Soma. The twenty-second day is called Bhāvana and the twenty-third is Supumān. The twenty-fourth is Vaikuṇṭha and the twenty-fifth is Arcīṣa. The twenty–sixth is Vallī and the twenty-seventh is Vairāja. The twenty-eighth is Gaurī and the twenty-ninth is Māheśvara. In this kalpa Śiva destroys Tripura. The last day of the month is called Pitṛ-kalpa. This is the dark moon of Brahmā’s month. These kalpas are known as the days of Brahmā and have existed in the past and will exist in the future. The present kalpa is the Varāha kalpa, the first day of the first month in the second half of Brahmā’s life.

Śvetaḥ refers to the Śveta-vārāha-kalpa. That is also the present Vārāha-kalpa. The first day after Brahmā is born is called Brāhma-kalpa. The last day of the month or Pitṛ-kalpa at the end of the first half of Brahmā’s life is called the Pādma-kalpa, since the planets take the shape of a lotus during that day.

The present kalpa is the Pādma-kalpa, also called Varāha-kalpa because the boar incarnation took place during it. Time has names, and within named eras the Lord acts in specific ways. We are inside a named, structured story.
Reflection Questions
  • Does my picture of 'this age' have texture and incarnational presence in it?
  • How does naming the kalpa I live in change my sense of where I stand in cosmic narrative?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.48

↗
शौनक उवाच यदाह नो भवान् सूत क्षत्ता भागवतोत्तम: । चचार तीर्थानि भुवस्त्यक्त्वा बन्धून् सुदुस्त्यजान् ॥ ४८ ॥
śaunaka uvāca
[shaunaka uvaacha]
yad āha no bhavān sūta
[yad aaha no bhavaan soota]
kṣattā bhāgavatottamaḥ
[kshattaa bhaagavatottamah]
cacāra tīrthāni bhuvas
[chachaara teerthaani bhuvas]
tyaktvā bandhūn sudustyajān
[tyaktvaa bandhoon sudustyajaan]
śaunakaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śaunaka Muni said yat — as āha — you said naḥ — unto us bhavān — your good self sūta — O Sūta kṣattā — Vidura bhāgavata-uttamaḥ — one of the topmost devotees of the Lord cacāra — practiced tīrthāni — places of pilgrimage bhuvaḥ — on the earth tyaktvā — leaving aside bandhūn — all relatives su-dustyajān — very difficult to give up.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaunaka uvāca
śaunakaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śaunaka Muni said
yad āha no bhavān sūta
yat
as
āha
you said
naḥ
unto us
bhavān
your good self
sūta
O Sūta
kṣattā bhāgavatottamaḥ
kṣattā
Vidura
bhāgavata-uttamaḥ
one of the topmost devotees of the Lord
cacāra tīrthāni bhuvas
cacāra
practiced
tīrthāni
places of pilgrimage
bhuvaḥ
on the earth
tyaktvā bandhūn sudustyajān
tyaktvā
leaving aside
bandhūn
all relatives
su-dustyajān
very difficult to give up.
Śaunaka Ṛṣi, after hearing all about the creation, inquired from Sūta Gosvāmī about Vidura, for Sūta Gosvāmī had previously informed him how Vidura left home, leaving aside all his relatives, who were very difficult to leave.

The ṛṣis headed by Śaunaka were more anxious to know about Vidura, who met Maitreya Ṛṣi while traveling to the pilgrimage sites of the world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: O Sūta! You have told us that Vidura, the best of devotees went on pilgrimage around the world, giving up friends who are difficult to give up. Discussion of the soul took place between Vidura and Maitreya. Knowledgeable Maitreya, implored by Vidura explained the highest truth. O excellent sage! Please tell us all of that and the actions of Vidura.
Commentary

Being eager to hear other topics, the proposed topic of the Pādma-kalpa gets delayed by the question of Śaunaka. You have told us:

viduras tīrtha-yātrāyāṁ maitreyād ātmano gatim jñātvāgād dhāstinapuraṁ tayāvāpta-vivitsitaḥ

Having learned about Kṛṣṇa, the goal of the jīva, from Maitreya while on pilgrimage, Vidura came to Hastināpura with a desire to teach that. SB 1.13.1

Bhagavān means he who is full of knowledge. Kṣattā means Vidura. Kauśāraveḥ refers to Maitreya.

Related verses
After hearing of creation, Śaunaka and the sages turned to a transcendental topic — Vidura, who left family to seek truth. Material cosmology is necessary, but the sages are even more eager for the stories of devotees. Notice where appetite turns.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does my own appetite turn after cosmology — toward more physics, or toward devotees' lives?
  • Whose Vidura-like leaving is asking to be studied by me right now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.49-50

↗
क्षत्तु: कौशारवेस्तस्य संवादोऽध्यात्मसंश्रित: । यद्वा स भगवांस्तस्मै पृष्टस्तत्त्वमुवाच ह ॥ ४९ ॥ ब्रूहि नस्तदिदं सौम्य विदुरस्य विचेष्टितम् । बन्धुत्यागनिमित्तं च यथैवागतवान् पुन: ॥ ५० ॥
kṣattuḥ kauśāraves tasya
[kshattuh kaushaaraves tasya]
saṁvādo ’dhyātma-saṁśritaḥ
[samvaado ’dhyaatma-samshritah]
yad vā sa bhagavāṁs tasmai
[yad vaa sa bhagavaams tasmai]
pṛṣṭas tattvam uvāca ha
[prishtas tattvam uvaacha ha]
brūhi nas tad idaṁ saumya
[broohi nas tad idam saumya]
vidurasya viceṣṭitam
[vidurasya vicheshtitam]
bandhu-tyāga-nimittaṁ ca
[bandhu-tyaaga-nimittam cha]
yathaivāgatavān punaḥ
[yathaivaagatavaan punah]
kṣattuḥ — of Vidura kauśāraveḥ — as that of Maitreya tasya — their saṁvādaḥ — news adhyātma — in the matter of transcendental knowledge saṁśritaḥ — full of yat — which vā — anything else saḥ — he bhagavān — His Grace tasmai — unto him pṛṣṭaḥ — inquired tattvam — the truth uvāca — answered ha — in the past brūhi — please tell naḥ — unto us tat — those matters idam — here saumya — O gentle one vidurasya — of Vidura viceṣṭitam — activities bandhu-tyāga — renouncing the friends nimittam — the cause of ca — also yathā — as eva — also āgatavān — came back punaḥ — again (at home).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣattuḥ kauśāraves tasya
kṣattuḥ
of Vidura
kauśāraveḥ
as that of Maitreya
tasya
their
saṁvādo ’dhyātma-saṁśritaḥ
saṁvādaḥ
news
yad vā sa bhagavāṁs tasmai
adhyātma
in the matter of transcendental knowledge
saṁśritaḥ
full of
pṛṣṭas tattvam uvāca ha
brūhi nas tad idaṁ saumya
yat
which
vidurasya viceṣṭitam
bandhu-tyāga-nimittaṁ ca
yathaivāgatavān punaḥ
vā
anything else
saḥ
he
bhagavān
His Grace
tasmai
unto him
pṛṣṭaḥ
inquired
tattvam
the truth
uvāca
answered
ha
in the past
brūhi
please tell
naḥ
unto us
tat
those matters
idam
here
saumya
O gentle one
vidurasya
of Vidura
viceṣṭitam
activities
bandhu-tyāga
renouncing the friends
nimittam
the cause of
ca
also
yathā
as
eva
also
āgatavān
came back
punaḥ
again (at home).
Śaunaka Ṛṣi said: Let us know, please, what topics were discussed between Vidura and Maitreya, who talked on transcendental subjects, and what was inquired by Vidura and replied by Maitreya. Also please let us know the reason for Vidura’s giving up the connection of his family members, and why he again came home. Please also let us know the activities of Vidura while he was in the places of pilgrimage.

Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī was narrating the topics of the creation and destruction of the material world, but it appears that the ṛṣis headed by Śaunaka were more inclined to hear of transcendental subjects, which are on a higher level than the physical. There are two classes of men, namely those too addicted to the gross body and the material world, and others, on the higher level, who are interested more in transcendental knowledge. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam gives facility to everyone, both to the materialist and to the transcendentalist. By hearing Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in the matter of the Lord’s glorious activities both in the material world and in the transcendental world, men can derive equal benefit. The materialists are more interested in the physical laws and how they are acting, and they see wonders in those physical glamors. Sometimes, due to physical glamors, they forget the glories of the Lord. They should know definitely that physical activities and their wonders are all initiated by the Lord. The rose in the garden gradually takes its shape and color to become beautiful and sweet not by a blind physical law, although it appears like that. Behind that physical law is the direction of the complete consciousness of the Supreme Lord; otherwise things cannot take shape so systematically. The artist draws a picture of a rose very nicely with all attention and artistic sense, and yet it does not become as perfect as the real rose. If that is the real fact, how can we say that the real rose has taken its shape without intelligence behind the beauty? This sort of conclusion is due to a poor fund of knowledge. One must know from the above description of creation and annihilation that the supreme consciousness, being omnipresent, can take care of everything with perfect attention. That is the fact of the omnipresence of the Supreme Lord. Persons, still more foolish than the gross materialists, however, claim to be transcendentalists and claim to have such supreme all-pervading consciousness, but offer no proof. Such foolish persons cannot know what is going on behind the next wall, yet they are falsely proud of possessing the cosmic, all-pervading consciousness of the Supreme Person. For them also, hearing of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is a great help. It will open their eyes to see that simply by claiming supreme consciousness one does not become supremely conscious. One has to prove in the physical world that he has such supreme consciousness. The ṛṣis of Naimiṣāraṇya, however, were above the gross materialists and the false transcendentalists, and thus they were always anxious to know the real truth in transcendental matters, as discussed by authorities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: O Sūta! You have told us that Vidura, the best of devotees went on pilgrimage around the world, giving up friends who are difficult to give up. Discussion of the soul took place between Vidura and Maitreya. Knowledgeable Maitreya, implored by Vidura explained the highest truth. O excellent sage! Please tell us all of that and the actions of Vidura.
Commentary

Being eager to hear other topics, the proposed topic of the Pādma-kalpa gets delayed by the question of Śaunaka. You have told us:

viduras tīrtha-yātrāyāṁ maitreyād ātmano gatim jñātvāgād dhāstinapuraṁ tayāvāpta-vivitsitaḥ

Having learned about Kṛṣṇa, the goal of the jīva, from Maitreya while on pilgrimage, Vidura came to Hastināpura with a desire to teach that. SB 1.13.1

Bhagavān means he who is full of knowledge. Kṣattā means Vidura. Kauśāraveḥ refers to Maitreya.

Related verses
The sages want to know: what did Vidura and Maitreya discuss, why did Vidura leave his family, and what did he do at the pilgrimage places? Two classes of audience exist — gross-body addicted and transcendentally hungry. The Bhāgavatam feeds both.
Reflection Questions
  • Which class of audience am I most days, and how do I shift up?
  • What 'pilgrimage' is mine, and am I actually going to it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.51

↗
सूत उवाच राज्ञा परीक्षिता पृष्टो यदवोचन्महामुनि: । तद्वोऽभिधास्ये श‍ृणुत राज्ञ: प्रश्नानुसारत: ॥ ५१ ॥ यच्च व्रजन्त्यनिमिषामृषभानुवृत्त्या दूरेयमा ह्युपरि न: स्पृहणीयशीला: । भर्तुर्मिथ: सुयशस: कथनानुराग- वैक्लव्यबाष्पकलया पुलकीकृताङ्गा: ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
rājñā parīkṣitā pṛṣṭo
[raajnaa pareekshitaa prishto]
yad avocan mahā-muniḥ
[yad avochan mahaa-munih]
tad vo ’bhidhāsye śṛṇuta
[tad vo ’bhidhaasye shrinuta]
rājñaḥ praśnānusārataḥ
[raajnah prashnaanusaaratah]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī replied rājñā — by the King parīkṣitā — by Parīkṣit pṛṣṭaḥ — as asked yat — what avocat — spoke mahā-muniḥ — the great sage tat — that very thing vaḥ — unto you abhidhāsye — I shall explain śṛṇuta — please hear rājñaḥ — by the King praśna — question anusārataḥ — in accordance with.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī replied
rājñā parīkṣitā pṛṣṭo
rājñā
by the King
parīkṣitā
by Parīkṣit
pṛṣṭaḥ
as asked
yad avocan mahā-muniḥ
yat
what
avocat
spoke
mahā-muniḥ
the great sage
tad vo ’bhidhāsye śṛṇuta
tat
that very thing
vaḥ
unto you
abhidhāsye
I shall explain
śṛṇuta
please hear
rājñaḥ praśnānusārataḥ
rājñaḥ
by the King
praśna
question
anusārataḥ
in accordance with.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī explained: I shall now explain to you the very subjects explained by the great sage in answer to King Parīkṣit’s inquiries. Please hear them attentively.

Any question that is put forward may be answered by quoting the authority, and that satisfies the saner section. That is the system even in the law court. The best lawyer gives evidence from the past judgment of the court without taking much trouble to establish his case. This is called the paramparā system, and learned authorities follow it without manufacturing rubbish interpretations.

īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ anādir ādir govindaḥ sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam

( Brahma-saṁhitā. 5.1)

Let us all obey the Supreme Lord, whose hand is in everything, without exception.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Second Canto, Tenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Bhāgavatam Is the Answer to All Questions.”

END OF THE SECOND CANTO

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: I will explain to you what the great sage Śukadeva spoke in response to Parīkṣit when asked by Parīkṣit. Please listen.
Commentary

The meaning is this. What you have asked, the King also asked Śukadeva. Śukadeva spoke in answer to the question of Parīkṣit previously about the conversation between Vidura and Maitreya. I will relate that to you.

Thus the commentary on the tenth chapter of the Second Canto of Bhāgavatam has been completed to give pleasure to the hearts of the devotees in accordance with the views of the ācāryas. Because the Lord performed action in response to the thirst of Brahmā, satisfying him, he showered the universe with sweet mercy.

Chapter One Questions by Vidura

Sūta Gosvāmī promises to explain what Maitreya said to Parīkṣit's questions by quoting the authority. The paramparā system answers by citing precedent, not by manufacturing interpretations. Receive, then transmit faithfully.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I cite authority in my spiritual reasoning, or manufacture my own interpretations?
  • What would 'receive then transmit faithfully' look like in how I share spiritual ideas?
📝 My note