FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

2.5 · The Cause of All Causes

38 verses · 🖨 Class prep
U Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (11703 chars)

U - Universal Creation (4-7) We may wonder how souls become disconnected from Krishna in the first place. When Srila Prabhupada was once asked why Krishna created the material world, he emphatically replied: “Because you wanted it!” The Lord endows each living being with the free will to exist separately from Him, and the universal creation facilitates that choice. Sukadeva Goswami narrated how Brahma, the engineer of the universe, explained the process of material creation to Narada Muni. When we understand the greatness of God, and how He creates, maintains, and enters the material universes, our appreciation for His loving compassion increases.

Previous Investing in a Relationship Next Process of Universal Creation Last updated 1 year ago

U - Universal Creation (4-7)

U - Universal Creation (4-7) We may wonder how souls become disconnected from Krishna in the first place. When Srila Prabhupada was once asked why Krishna created the material world, he emphatically replied: “Because you wanted it!” The Lord endows each living being with the free will to exist separately from Him, and the universal creation facilitates that choice. Sukadeva Goswami narrated how Brahma, the engineer of the universe, explained the process of material creation to Narada Muni. When we understand the greatness of God, and how He creates, maintains, and enters the material universes, our appreciation for His loving compassion increases.

Previous Investing in a Relationship Next Process of Universal Creation Last updated 1 year ago

Process of Universal Creation

U - Universal Creation (4-7) Process of Universal Creation Chapter 4, 5 Having heard the informative elaborations on the yoga processes, Maharaja Pariksit asked several questions concerning the creation, maintenance and annihilation of the universes. Sukadeva Goswami offered heartfelt prayers to the Lord and responded by narrating a conversation between Narada Muni and Brahma, since the itinerant sage had made the same enquiries. When questioned about creation, Brahma, in natural humility, explained how the Lord provided the original ingredients of creation and then gave him the service of engineering the universe. He could not take full credit, as he was simply the secondary cause. Brahma then offered a technical explanation of the evolution of various elements – the three modes of material nature, aspects of sense perception and their corresponding sense organs, and the controlling deities behind our senses. Finally, he explained how the universes are created, and how aspects of the cosmos represent the different features of the Lord’s body.

Previous U - Universal Creation (4-7) Next Purusa Sukta and the Universal Form Last updated 1 year ago

Purusa Sukta and the Universal Form

U - Universal Creation (4-7) Purusa Sukta and the Universal Form Chapter 6 Purusa Sukta , a famous hymn from the Rg Veda which is dedicated to the ‘cosmic being’ ( purusa ), is the prayer uttered by Brahma at the time of creation. It explains how all things past, present and future, emanate from and rest in the purusa . Srimad-Bhagavatam confirms this purusa to be Garbhodakasayi Vishnu, who is immanent in the manifested world and simultaneously transcendental to it. Brahma explained the significance of the mouth, nostrils, eyes, skin, hairs, nails, arms, feet, genitals, anus, back, veins, belly and heart of the Universal Form. He goes on to establish that regardless of one’s qualifications and so-called greatness, no living being can understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead in totality. One is impelled to surrender, because if the Lord is unaware of His limits, how can we ever understand?

Previous Process of Universal Creation Next Universal Incarnations Last updated 1 year ago

The Beginning

U - Universal Creation (4-7) The Beginning “The material creation is but a temporary exhibition of the material energy of the Almighty God. This material manifestation is necessary to give a chance to the conditioned souls who are unwilling to associate with the Lord in the relationship of loving transcendental service. Such unwilling conditioned souls are not allowed to enter the liberated life of spiritual existence because, at heart they are not willing to serve. Instead, they want to enjoy themselves as imitation gods. The living entities are constitutionally eternal servitors of the Lord, but some of them, because of misusing their independence, do not wish to serve; therefore they are allowed to enjoy the material nature, which is called maya , or illusion.” ( SB 2.6.42 )

Previous Universal Incarnations Next Why is the Universe Created? Last updated 1 year ago

Importance of Creation

U - Universal Creation (4-7) The Beginning Importance of Creation Numerous sections of Srimad-Bhagavatam discuss the creation of the material world. It’s a topic which is detailed in Cantos Two, Three, Five, Eleven, and Twelve. Why is so much emphasis and prominence given to the subject matter?

Krishna’s Greatness – by exploring the complexity, intricacy and extreme vastness of universal creation, we better appreciate Krishna’s greatness in masterminding the whole process. The ingenuity of Krishna’s system allows Him to enjoy in the spiritual world, while this mammoth task is simultaneously carried out by His expansions and energies. It also demonstrates how far Krishna extends Himself, out of unlimited compassion, to fulfil the aspirations of the living entity.

Our Minuteness – when confronted by a huge ocean we naturally feel quite small. Similarly, when we begin to comprehend the enormity of the universe, it helps us put our life in perspective. The Srimad-Bhagavatam repeatedly exposes the absurdity of thinking oneself as the enjoyer, controller and centre of the universe.

Overall Confidence – the inquisitive mind, Srila Prabhupada said, will naturally look up at the night-time sky and wonder where it all came from. Thus, to ssatisfy our intellect, remove doubts and demonstrate that there is a substantial explanation of cosmic origins, the Srimad-Bhagavatam systematically details it. While the complexity and enormity of the explanation is beyond the grasp of our logic and intellect, many elements can allow us to interface with prevailing models of cosmology to open new ways of thinking.

For bhakti to flourish, we need to acknowledge the greatness of Krishna, the insignificance of ourselves, and possess unshakeable faith in scriptures ( sastra ) to make the connection. Thus, the invaluable explanations of universal creation significantly assist this process.

Previous When is the Universe Created? Next T - Total Theology (8-10) Last updated 1 year ago

When is the Universe Created?

U - Universal Creation (4-7) The Beginning When is the Universe Created? If we look at the world around us, it’s clear that everything functions in cycles – seasons repeat themselves, days of the week rotate in sequence and the sun continually rises and sets. The Vedic scriptures explain how our lives also run in cycles; we are born, we grow, we reproduce, stay for some time, gradually begin to dwindle, then die, only to be reborn and repeat it all over again. This, of course, is known as reincarnation ( samsara ). The greater material creation mirrors this cyclical pattern. The cosmos moves in a succession of great cycles called Divya-yugas. The Vedic texts detail the length of these cycles. Each Divya-yuga is composed of four ages which progressively decline in length: Satya-yuga (sometimes called Krita-yuga) lasts 1,728,000 years; Treta-yuga lasts 1,296,000 years; Dvapara-yuga lasts 864,000 years; and Kali-yuga, our current age, lasts 432,000 years. These four periods are essentially the golden, silver, copper and iron ages, respectively. Not only do the ages decline in length, but they decline in spiritual vibrancy and saintly virtuosity. We are currently 5,000 years into the dark age of Kali-yuga, and when this period comes to an end (in 427,000 years), partial destruction takes place and Satya-yuga is re-established. 71 Divya-yugas make up one Manvantara – the lifetime of a Manu, who is the father of mankind. There are 14 Manus in a day of Brahma. This means that one thousand Divya-yuga cycles (approximately 4.3 billion years) make up merely one day in the life of Brahma. Each day is followed by a night of equal length. During the night, Brahma sleeps and most planets are submerged in waters of devastation. At the end of the night, Brahma awakens and another day of one thousand cycles commences. Three hundred and sixty of these days and nights make up one of Brahma’s years; Brahma lives for one hundred such years. The time frames are mind-boggling!

Previous Why is the Universe Created? Next Importance of Creation Last updated 1 year ago

Why is the Universe Created?

U - Universal Creation (4-7) The Beginning Why is the Universe Created? The material world provides an opportunity for the errant soul to simulate the role of being the controller and enjoyer. The initial ingredients and impetus for creation come from Lord Vishnu, after which Brahma takes over as the engineer. The various living entities assume the role of subsequent controllers by deploying their energies in crafting cities, communities, families, homes, possessions, wealth, social identities and circles of influence. In our attempts to become ‘king of the castle,’ we soon realise that even if we are successful, the castles are built in sand, eventually washed away by the ruthless waves of time. Our sojourn in this material world can be likened to a movie. Just as a movie is essentially a manipulation of light, the material world is similarly a combination of various transformations of material energy. Movies tend to be based around the aspirations and dreams of the audience, and in the same way, the material world is manufactured according to the desires of the living entity. Unfortunately, just as watching a movie never truly fulfils our desires, our activities in the material world never bring the satisfaction we yearn for. Movies have an entrance fee, and similarly, to enter the movie of the material world, one simply needs an accumulation of karma. While we have good and bad reactions in our stock, we return to the material world to settle the balance. Just as people hop from movie to movie, experiencing different flavours and emotions, the entangled living being hops from universe to universe in various forms of life trying to experience the variety of what’s on offer. Only when we retire from the frantic search for material enjoyment and re-direct our energies towards a loving relationship with Krishna, will we find our permanent and steady state of being in the real world, the spiritual world.

Previous The Beginning Next When is the Universe Created? Last updated 1 year ago

Universal Incarnations

U - Universal Creation (4-7) Universal Incarnations Chapter 7 Brahma then described various incarnations of the Lord and outlined the background, purpose and activities of each one. He established Krishna as the supreme source of these manifestations and narrated some highlights from the Lord’s earthly pastimes. He then listed the surrendered personalities who have grasped the Lord’s greatness. By hearing from such pure devotees and embracing the process of surrender, one can attain the same perfection. Having imparted this knowledge, Brahma encouraged Narada to share it throughout the universe. Narada accepted this task as his life and soul - his name literally means ‘one who gives Narayana to others.’

Previous Purusa Sukta and the Universal Form Next The Beginning Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.1

↗
नारद उवाच देवदेव नमस्तेऽस्तु भूतभावन पूर्वज । तद् विजानीहि यज्ज्ञानमात्मतत्त्वनिदर्शनम् ॥ १ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
deva-deva namas te ’stu
[deva-deva namas te ’stu]
bhūta-bhāvana pūrvaja
[bhoota-bhaavana poorvaja]
tad vijānīhi yaj jñānam
[tad vijaaneehi yaj jnaanam]
ātma-tattva-nidarśanam
[aatma-tattva-nidarshanam]
nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada said deva — of all demigods deva — the demigod namaḥ — obeisances te — unto you as astu — are bhūta-bhāvana — the generator of all living beings pūrva-ja — the firstborn tat vijānīhi — please explain that knowledge yat jñānam — which knowledge ātma-tattva — transcendental nidarśanam — specifically directs.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada said
deva-deva namas te ’stu
deva
of all demigods
deva
the demigod
namaḥ
obeisances
te
unto you as
astu
are
bhūta-bhāvana pūrvaja
bhūta-bhāvana
the generator of all living beings
pūrva-ja
the firstborn
tad vijānīhi yaj jñānam
tat vijānīhi
please explain that knowledge
yat jñānam
which knowledge
ātma-tattva-nidarśanam
ātma-tattva
transcendental
nidarśanam
specifically directs.
Śrī Nārada Muni asked Brahmājī: O chief amongst the demigods, O firstborn living entity, I beg to offer my respectful obeisances unto you. Please tell me that transcendental knowledge which specifically directs one to the truth of the individual soul and the Supersoul.

The perfection of the paramparā system, or the path of disciplic succession, is further confirmed. In the previous chapter it has been established that Brahmājī, the firstborn living entity, received knowledge directly from the Supreme Lord, and the same knowledge was imparted to Nārada, the next disciple. Nārada asked to receive the knowledge, and Brahmājī imparted it upon being asked. Therefore, asking for transcendental knowledge from the right person and receiving it properly is the regulation of the disciplic succession. This process is recommended in the Bhagavad-gītā (4.2) . The inquisitive student must approach a qualified spiritual master to receive transcendental knowledge by surrender, submissive inquiries and service. Knowledge received by submissive inquiries and service is more effective than knowledge received in exchange for money. A spiritual master in the line of disciplic succession from Brahmā and Nārada has no demand for dollars and cents. A bona fide student has to satisfy him by sincere service to obtain knowledge of the relation and nature of the individual soul and the Supersoul.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: O lord of lords! O creator of the living beings! O first born! You know that knowledge which reveals the truth about the ātmā and Paramātmā.
Commentary

In the Fifth Chapter Brahmā explains the creation of elements to Nārada and the universal form with the planets as his various limbs.

Bhūta-bhāvanaḥ means he who creates the bodies of the living entities. Pūrva-jāh means he is born before Marīci and others, from who appeared my brothers. You know in detail (vijānīhi) that knowledge which reveals the truth about ātmā and Paramātmā. The imperative here stands for the present tense. Or it can stand for the causative, “Please let me know.”

True spiritual knowledge flows through a living disciplic chain. Approach a qualified teacher with humility, honest questions, and willingness to serve — not as a customer paying for a product. Knowledge bought is shallow; knowledge received through sincere service transforms.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my life am I trying to 'buy' wisdom rather than earn it through service and humility?
  • Who in my life embodies a teacher I could approach with the openness Nārada models here?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.2

↗
यद्रूपं यदधिष्ठानं यत: सृष्टमिदं प्रभो । यत्संस्थं यत्परं यच्च तत् तत्त्वं वद तत्त्वत: ॥ २ ॥
yad rūpaṁ yad adhiṣṭhānaṁ
[yad roopam yad adhishthaanam]
yataḥ sṛṣṭam idaṁ prabho
[yatah srishtam idam prabho]
yat saṁsthaṁ yat paraṁ yac ca
[yat samstham yat param yach cha]
tat tattvaṁ vada tattvataḥ
[tat tattvam vada tattvatah]
yat — what rūpam — the symptoms of manifestation yat — what adhiṣṭhānam — background yataḥ — from where sṛṣṭam — created idam — this world prabho — O my father yat — in which saṁstham — conserved yat — what param — under control yat — what are ca — and tat — of this tattvam — the symptoms vada — please describe tattvataḥ — factually.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad rūpaṁ yad adhiṣṭhānaṁ
yat
what
rūpam
the symptoms of manifestation
yat
what
adhiṣṭhānam
background
yataḥ sṛṣṭam idaṁ prabho
yataḥ
from where
sṛṣṭam
created
idam
this world
prabho
O my father
yat saṁsthaṁ yat paraṁ yac ca
yat
in which
saṁstham
conserved
yat
what
param
under control
yat
what are
ca
and
tat tattvaṁ vada tattvataḥ
tat
of this
tattvam
the symptoms
vada
please describe
tattvataḥ
factually.
My dear father, please describe factually the symptoms of this manifest world. What is its background? How is it created? How is it conserved? And under whose control is all this being done?

The inquiries by Nārada Muni on the basis of factual cause and effect appear very reasonable. The atheists, however, put forward many self-made theories without any touch of cause and effect. The manifested world, as well as the spirit soul, is still unexplained by the godless atheists through the medium of experimental knowledge, although they have put forward many theories manufactured by their fertile brains. Contrary to such mental speculative theories of creation, however, Nārada Muni wanted to know all the facts of creation in truth, and not by theories.

Transcendental knowledge regarding the soul and the Supersoul includes knowledge of the phenomenal world and the basis of its creation. In the phenomenal world three things are factually observed by any intelligent man: the living beings, the manifest world, and the ultimate control over them. The intelligent man can see that neither the living entity nor the phenomenal world are creations of chance. The symmetry of creation and its regulative actions and reactions suggests the plan of an intelligent brain behind them, and by genuine inquiry one may find out the ultimate cause with the help of one who knows them factually.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Please explain the truth about the characteristics of the universe, its shelter, the process by which it was created, into what it merges at destruction, on what it is dependent, and of what it is composed.
Commentary

Speak the truth about this universe (idam) its characteristics (rūpam), its shelter (adhiṣṭhānām), by what ingredients it is created, in what it merges at destruction (yat saṁstham), upon what it depends (yat param), what it is made of (yac ca).

Reasonable inquiry asks not just 'how' but 'who is behind this'. The symmetry of the world points to intelligence, not accident. Genuine seeking looks for the actual cause, not for a clever theory that flatters the seeker.
Reflection Questions
  • Do my questions about life look for truth, or for answers that confirm what I already want to believe?
  • When I look at nature's order, do I let it raise the question of a designer, or do I quickly explain it away?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.3

↗
सर्वं ह्येतद् भवान् वेद भूतभव्यभवत्प्रभु: । करामलकवद् विश्वं विज्ञानावसितं तव ॥ ३ ॥
sarvaṁ hy etad bhavān veda
[sarvam hy etad bhavaan veda]
bhūta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhuḥ
[bhoota-bhavya-bhavat-prabhuh]
karāmalaka-vad viśvaṁ
[karaamalaka-vad vishvam]
vijñānāvasitaṁ tava
[vijnaanaavasitam tava]
sarvam — all and everything hi — certainly etat — this bhavān — your good self veda — know bhūta — all that is created or born bhavya — all that will be created or born bhavat — all that is being created prabhuḥ — you, the master of everything kara-āmalaka-vat — just like a walnut within your grip viśvam — the universe vijñāna-avasitam — within your knowledge scientifically tava — your.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarvaṁ hy etad bhavān veda
sarvam
all and everything
hi
certainly
etat
this
bhavān
your good self
veda
know
bhūta-bhavya-bhavat-prabhuḥ
bhūta
all that is created or born
bhavya
all that will be created or born
bhavat
all that is being created
prabhuḥ
you, the master of everything
karāmalaka-vad viśvaṁ
kara-āmalaka-vat
just like a walnut within your grip
viśvam
the universe
vijñānāvasitaṁ tava
vijñāna-avasitam
within your knowledge scientifically
tava
your.
My dear father, all this is known to you scientifically because whatever was created in the past, whatever will be created in the future, or whatever is being created at present, as well as everything within the universe, is within your grip, just like a walnut.

Brahmā is the direct creator of the manifested universe and everything within the universe. He therefore knows what happened in the past, what will happen in the future, and what is happening at present. Three principal items, namely the living being, the phenomenal world and the controller, are all in continuous action — past, present and future — and the direct manager is supposed to know everything of such actions and reactions, as one knows about a walnut within the grip of one’s palm. The direct manufacturer of a particular thing is supposed to know how he learned the art of manufacturing, where he got the ingredients, how he set it up and how the products in the manufacturing process are being turned out. Because Brahmā is the firstborn living being, naturally he is supposed to know everything about creative functions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You, the master of all living beings in the past, present and future, know this universe; you know everything about the Paramātmā, jīva and matter. Thus, you understand this universe with detailed knowledge like an āmalakī in your hand.
Commentary

You know everything. You know three things: Paramātmā, jīvātmā and the material universe. Because you are the master of all entities born in the past, of all born in the future, and all existing now, you know (avasitam) with detailed (vi) knowledge (jñāna) this universe like an āmalakī in your hand.

Someone close to the creative process knows what is happening past, present, and future. We can trust those who have direct, lived knowledge — not just theorists. Seek the practitioner, not just the commentator.
Reflection Questions
  • In matters of the soul, am I learning from someone with direct realization or just intellectual familiarity?
  • What 'walnut in my palm' — what I truly know from experience — am I qualified to share with others?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.4

↗
यद्विज्ञानो यदाधारो यत्परस्त्वं यदात्मक: । एक: सृजसि भूतानि भूतैरेवात्ममायया ॥ ४ ॥
yad-vijñāno yad-ādhāro
[yad-vijnaano yad-aadhaaro]
yat-paras tvaṁ yad-ātmakaḥ
[yat-paras tvam yad-aatmakah]
ekaḥ sṛjasi bhūtāni
[ekah srijasi bhootaani]
bhūtair evātma-māyayā
[bhootair evaatma-maayayaa]
yat-vijñānaḥ — the source of knowledge yat-ādhāraḥ — under whose protection yat-paraḥ — under whose subordination tvam — you yat-ātmakaḥ — in what capacity ekaḥ — alone sṛjasi — you are creating bhūtāni — the living entities bhūtaiḥ — with the help of the material elements eva — certainly ātma — self māyayā — by potency.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad-vijñāno yad-ādhāro
yat-vijñānaḥ
the source of knowledge
yat-ādhāraḥ
under whose protection
yat-paras tvaṁ yad-ātmakaḥ
yat-paraḥ
under whose subordination
tvam
you
yat-ātmakaḥ
in what capacity
ekaḥ sṛjasi bhūtāni
ekaḥ
alone
sṛjasi
you are creating
bhūtāni
the living entities
bhūtair evātma-māyayā
bhūtaiḥ
with the help of the material elements
eva
certainly
ātma
self
māyayā
by potency.
My dear father, what is the source of your knowledge? Under whose protection are you standing? And under whom are you working? What is your real position? Do you alone create all entities with material elements by your personal energy?

It was known to Śrī Nārada Muni that Lord Brahmā attained creative energy by undergoing severe austerities. As such, he could understand that there was someone else superior to Brahmājī who invested Brahmā with the power of creation. Therefore he asked all the above questions. Discoveries of progressive scientific achievements are therefore not independent. The scientist has to attain the knowledge of a thing already existing by means of the wonderful brain made by someone else. A scientist can work with the help of such an awarded brain, but it is not possible for the scientist to create his own or a similar brain. Therefore no one is independent in the matter of any creation, nor is such creation automatic.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You, the source of your own knowledge, your own shelter, dependent on yourself, with your self as your soul, without help create the living beings with the elements coming from your own energy.
Commentary

Let the universe be! Please explain something about yourself. You are your source of knowledge (yad-vijñānaḥ), your own shelter (yad-ādhāraḥ), dependent on yourself alone (yat-paraḥ) and you are your own ātmā. I think that you are the independent Supreme Lord. Ekaḥ means “without help from anyone.”

Even great achievements rest on capacities given to us. Scientists use brains they didn't make; we discover what was already arranged. Recognizing that nothing in us is fully self-made is the beginning of humility before God.
Reflection Questions
  • What gifts have I been mistaking for self-made achievements?
  • Who or what is the ultimate source behind the abilities I am most proud of?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.5

↗
आत्मन् भावयसे तानी न पराभावयन् स्वयम् । आत्मशक्तिमवष्टभ्य ऊर्णनाभिरिवाक्लम: ॥ ५ ॥
ātman bhāvayase tāni
[aatman bhaavayase taani]
na parābhāvayan svayam
[na paraabhaavayan svayam]
ātma-śaktim avaṣṭabhya
[aatma-shaktim avashtabhya]
ūrṇanābhir ivāklamaḥ
[oornanaabhir ivaaklamah]
ātman (ātmani) — by self bhāvayase — manifest tāni — all those na — not parābhāvayan — being defeated svayam — yourself ātma-śaktim — self-sufficient power avaṣṭabhya — being employed ūrṇa-nābhiḥ — the spider iva — like aklamaḥ — without help.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ātman bhāvayase tāni
ātman (ātmani)
by self
bhāvayase
manifest
tāni
all those
na parābhāvayan svayam
na
not
parābhāvayan
being defeated
svayam
yourself
ātma-śaktim avaṣṭabhya
ātma-śaktim
self-sufficient power
avaṣṭabhya
being employed
ūrṇanābhir ivāklamaḥ
ūrṇa-nābhiḥ
the spider
iva
like
aklamaḥ
without help.
As the spider very easily creates the network of its cobweb and manifests its power of creation without being defeated by others, so also you yourself, by employment of your self-sufficient energy, create without any other’s help.

The best example of self-sufficiency is the sun. The sun does not require to be illuminated by any other body. Rather, it is the sun which helps all other illuminating agents, for in the presence of the sun no other illuminating agent becomes prominent. Nārada compared the position of Brahmā to the self-sufficiency of the spider, who creates its own field of activities without any other’s help by employment of its own energetic creation of saliva.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Situated in your own energy like a spider creating his web, without fatigue, you protect the living beings within yourself, without being destroyed.
Commentary

You protect (bhāvayase) in yourself (ātman) these living beings. You do not get destroyed, just as a spider, situated in his own energy, creates his web. You are without fatigue (aklamaḥ).

The spider spins her web from her own substance — beautifully self-sufficient in appearance. But every creator works with energy received from a higher source. Apparent self-sufficiency in this world is always borrowed power.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse fluent capacity with true self-sufficiency?
  • How does it change my work when I see my energy as on loan from a Source?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.6

↗
नाहं वेद परं ह्यस्मिन्नापरं न समं विभो । नामरूपगुणैर्भाव्यं सदसत् किञ्चिदन्यत: ॥ ६ ॥
nāhaṁ veda paraṁ hy asmin
[naaham veda param hy asmin]
nāparaṁ na samaṁ vibho
[naaparam na samam vibho]
nāma-rūpa-guṇair bhāvyaṁ
[naama-roopa-gunair bhaavyam]
sad-asat kiñcid anyataḥ
[sad-asat kinchid anyatah]
na — do not aham — myself veda — know param — superior hi — for asmin — in this world na — neither aparam — inferior na — nor samam — equal vibho — O great one nāma — name rūpa — characteristics guṇaiḥ — by qualification bhāvyam — all that is created sat — eternal asat — temporary kiñcit — or anything like that anyataḥ — from any other source.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāhaṁ veda paraṁ hy asmin
na
do not
aham
myself
veda
know
param
superior
hi
for
asmin
in this world
nāparaṁ na samaṁ vibho
na
neither
aparam
inferior
na
nor
samam
equal
vibho
O great one
nāma-rūpa-guṇair bhāvyaṁ
nāma
name
rūpa
characteristics
guṇaiḥ
by qualification
bhāvyam
all that is created
sad-asat kiñcid anyataḥ
sat
eternal
asat
temporary
kiñcit
or anything like that
anyataḥ
from any other source.
Whatever we can understand by the nomenclature, characteristics and features of a particular thing — superior, inferior or equal, eternal or temporary — is not created from any source other than that of Your Lordship, thou so great.

The manifested world is full of varieties of created beings in 8,400,000 species of life, and some of them are superior and inferior to others. In human society the human being is considered to be the superior living being, and amongst the human beings there are also different varieties: good, bad, equal, etc. But Nārada Muni took for granted that none of them has any source of generation besides his father, Brahmājī. Therefore he wanted to know all about them from Lord Brahmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! I do not know from where else everything can arise whether it is superior, inferior or medium, produced with name, form and qualities, gross or subtle.
Commentary

Whatever is superior, inferior or medium in this world, created (bhāvyam) with names such as human, forms such as two legged forms, and qualities such as white color, whatever is gross and subtle (sad-asat), I do not know from where else it can come. I think that everything comes from you alone.

Every kind of being — superior, inferior, equal, lasting, fleeting — traces back to one Source. The endless variety of beings doesn't disprove a single origin; it expresses one. Diversity and unity are not opposites.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I see the variety of beings around me as evidence of one Source, or as fragments without connection?
  • How would my treatment of others change if I held them all as expressions of one origin?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.7

↗
स भवानचरद् घोरं यत् तप: सुसमाहित: । तेन खेदयसे नस्त्वं पराशङ्कां च यच्छसि ॥ ७ ॥
sa bhavān acarad ghoraṁ
[sa bhavaan acharad ghoram]
yat tapaḥ susamāhitaḥ
[yat tapah susamaahitah]
tena khedayase nas tvaṁ
[tena khedayase nas tvam]
parā-śaṅkāṁ ca yacchasi
[paraa-shankaam cha yachchasi]
saḥ — he bhavān — your good self acarat — undertook ghoram — severe yat tapaḥ — meditation su-samāhitaḥ — in perfect discipline tena — for that reason khedayase — gives pain naḥ — ourselves tvam — your good self parā — the ultimate truth śaṅkām — doubts ca — and yacchasi — giving us a chance.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa bhavān acarad ghoraṁ
saḥ
he
bhavān
your good self
acarat
undertook
ghoram
severe
yat tapaḥ susamāhitaḥ
yat tapaḥ
meditation
su-samāhitaḥ
in perfect discipline
tena khedayase nas tvaṁ
tena
for that reason
khedayase
gives pain
naḥ
ourselves
tvam
your good self
parā-śaṅkāṁ ca yacchasi
parā
the ultimate truth
śaṅkām
doubts
ca
and
yacchasi
giving us a chance.
Yet we are moved to wonder about the existence of someone more powerful than you when we think of your great austerities in perfect discipline, although your good self is so powerful in the matter of creation.

Following in the footsteps of Śrī Nārada Muni, one should not blindly accept his spiritual master as God Himself. A spiritual master is duly respected on a par with God, but a spiritual master claiming to be God Himself should at once be rejected. Nārada Muni accepted Brahmā as the Supreme due to Lord Brahmā’s wonderful acts in creation, but doubts arose in him when he saw that Lord Brahmā also worshiped some superior authority. The Supreme is supreme, and He has no worshipable superior. The ahaṅgrahopāsitā, or the one who worships himself with the idea of becoming God Himself, is misleading, but the intelligent disciple can at once detect that the Supreme God does not need to worship anyone, including Himself, in order to become God. Ahaṅgrahopāsanā may be one of the processes for transcendental realization, but the ahaṅgrahopāsitā can never be God Himself. No one becomes God by undergoing a process of transcendental realization. Nārada Muni thought of Brahmājī as the Supreme Person, but when he saw Brahmājī engaged in the process of transcendental realization, doubts arose in him. So he wanted to be clearly informed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though you are like this, you performed great austerities. By this you bewilder us. You produce a doubt that there is some other Lord.
Commentary

Though you are like this, you produce the doubt that there is some other Lord.

A teacher should be respected like God, but never accepted as God Himself. When even the most powerful being is seen worshiping a higher authority, the sincere student notices and asks honest questions. Real teachers point past themselves.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I tempted to make my teachers (or myself) bigger than they really are?
  • Does my own spiritual practice point past me, or is it quietly building me up as the center?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.8

↗
एतन्मे पृच्छत: सर्वं सर्वज्ञ सकलेश्वर । विजानीहि यथैवेदमहं बुध्येऽनुशासित: ॥ ८ ॥
etan me pṛcchataḥ sarvaṁ
[etan me prichchatah sarvam]
sarva-jña sakaleśvara
[sarva-jna sakaleshvara]
vijānīhi yathaivedam
[vijaaneehi yathaivedam]
ahaṁ budhye ’nuśāsitaḥ
[aham budhye ’nushaasitah]
etat — all those me — unto me pṛcchataḥ — inquisitive sarvam — all that is inquired sarva-jña — one who knows everything sakala — over all īśvara — the controller vijānīhi — kindly explain yathā — as eva — they are idam — this aham — myself budhye — can understand anuśāsitaḥ — just learning from you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etan me pṛcchataḥ sarvaṁ
etat
all those
me
unto me
pṛcchataḥ
inquisitive
sarvam
all that is inquired
sarva-jña sakaleśvara
sarva-jña
one who knows everything
sakala
over all
īśvara
the controller
vijānīhi yathaivedam
vijānīhi
kindly explain
yathā
as
eva
they are
idam
this
ahaṁ budhye ’nuśāsitaḥ
aham
myself
budhye
can understand
anuśāsitaḥ
just learning from you.
My dear father, you know everything, and you are the controller of all. Therefore, may all that I have inquired from you be kindly instructed to me so that I may be able to understand it as your student.

The inquiries made by Nārada Muni are very important for everyone concerned, and as such, Nārada requested Brahmājī to deem them suitable so that all others who may come in the line of disciplic succession of the Brahma sampradāya may also know them properly without any difficulty.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O omniscient one! O lord of all things! Please consider and tell me everything that I have asked, so that after being taught, I can understand.
Commentary

Considering carefully, tell me (vijānīhi) all the things indicated in my questions. Moreover, say it in such a way that, after being taught, I can comprehend completely. This means “Give the answer without obstructions.”

Sincere inquiry serves not only the inquirer but everyone who comes after. When we ask publicly and humbly, the answers become a gift for future seekers in the same lineage.
Reflection Questions
  • What honest question of mine, if asked openly, could benefit others walking a similar path?
  • Am I willing to look like a beginner so the next generation has better answers?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.9

↗
ब्रह्मोवाच सम्यक् कारुणिकस्येदं वत्स ते विचिकित्सितम् । यदहं चोदित: सौम्य भगवद्वीर्यदर्शने ॥ ९ ॥
brahmovāca
[brahmovaacha]
samyak kāruṇikasyedaṁ
[samyak kaarunikasyedam]
vatsa te vicikitsitam
[vatsa te vichikitsitam]
yad ahaṁ coditaḥ saumya
[yad aham choditah saumya]
bhagavad-vīrya-darśane
[bhagavad-veerya-darshane]
brahmā uvāca — Lord Brahmā said samyak — perfectly kāruṇikasya — of you, who are very kind idam — this vatsa — my dear boy te — your vicikitsitam — inquisitiveness yat — by which aham — myself coditaḥ — inspired saumya — O gentle one bhagavat — of the Personality of Godhead vīrya — prowess darśane — in the matter of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
brahmovāca
brahmā uvāca
Lord Brahmā said
samyak kāruṇikasyedaṁ
samyak
perfectly
kāruṇikasya
of you, who are very kind
idam
this
vatsa te vicikitsitam
vatsa
my dear boy
te
your
vicikitsitam
inquisitiveness
yad ahaṁ coditaḥ saumya
yat
by which
aham
myself
coditaḥ
inspired
saumya
O gentle one
bhagavad-vīrya-darśane
bhagavat
of the Personality of Godhead
vīrya
prowess
darśane
in the matter of.
Lord Brahmā said: My dear boy Nārada, being merciful to all (including me) you have asked all these questions because I have been inspired to see into the prowess of the Almighty Personality of Godhead.

Brahmājī, being so questioned by Nāradajī, congratulated him, for it is usual for the devotees to become very enthusiastic whenever they are questioned concerning the Almighty Personality of Godhead. That is the sign of a pure devotee of the Lord. Such discourses on the transcendental activities of the Lord purify the atmosphere in which such discussions are held, and the devotees thus become enlivened while answering such questions. It is purifying both for the questioners and for one who answers the questions. The pure devotees are not only satisfied by knowing everything about the Lord, but are also eager to broadcast the information to others, for they want to see that the glories of the Lord are known to everyone. Thus the devotee feels satisfied when such an opportunity is offered to him. This is the basic principle of missionary activities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā said: O auspicious son! You are merciful to me. Your doubt is proper, because I was inspired on seeing the power of the Lord in creating the universe.
Commentary

Brahmā is overjoyed with the question. O son (vatsa)! Your doubt (viciktisitam) is proper (samyak). You, in questioning me, though you have all knowledge, have been merciful (kāruṇikasya) to me, your father. Since you told me to consider (vijānīhi) and answer, please know that I was inspired by seeing the Lord’s power in creating the universe. For a moment I see that in my mind. In this way he rejoiced.

Devotees come alive when asked about the Lord — that aliveness is itself a sign of pure devotion. Sharing what one has received purifies both the speaker and the listener. Mission begins not as duty but as natural overflow.
Reflection Questions
  • What spiritual topic lights me up so much that I want to share it?
  • When was the last time I let myself be visibly enlivened by talk of the Divine?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.10

↗
नानृतं तव तच्चापि यथा मां प्रब्रवीषि भो: । अविज्ञाय परं मत्त एतावत्त्वं यतो हि मे ॥ १० ॥
nānṛtaṁ tava tac cāpi
[naanritam tava tach chaapi]
yathā māṁ prabravīṣi bhoḥ
[yathaa maam prabraveeshi bhoh]
avijñāya paraṁ matta
[avijnaaya param matta]
etāvat tvaṁ yato hi me
[etaavat tvam yato hi me]
na — not anṛtam — false tava — of yours tat — that ca — also api — as you have stated yathā — in the matter of mām — of myself prabravīṣi — as you describe bhoḥ — O my son avijñāya — without knowing param — the Supreme mattaḥ — beyond myself etāvat — all that you have spoken tvam — yourself yataḥ — for the reason of hi — certainly me — about me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nānṛtaṁ tava tac cāpi
na
not
anṛtam
false
tava
of yours
tat
that
ca
also
api
as you have stated
yathā māṁ prabravīṣi bhoḥ
yathā
in the matter of
mām
of myself
prabravīṣi
as you describe
bhoḥ
O my son
avijñāya paraṁ matta
avijñāya
without knowing
param
the Supreme
mattaḥ
beyond myself
etāvat tvaṁ yato hi me
etāvat
all that you have spoken
tvam
yourself
yataḥ
for the reason of
hi
certainly
me
about me.
Whatever you have spoken about me is not false because unless and until one is aware of the Personality of Godhead, who is the ultimate truth beyond me, one is sure to be illusioned by observing my powerful activities.

“The frog in the well” logic illustrates that a frog residing in the atmosphere and boundary of a well cannot imagine the length and breadth of the gigantic ocean. Such a frog, when informed of the gigantic length and breadth of the ocean, first of all does not believe that there is such an ocean, and if someone assures him that factually there is such a thing, the frog then begins to measure it by imagination by means of pumping its belly as far as possible, with the result that the tiny abdomen of the frog bursts and the poor frog dies without any experience of the actual ocean. Similarly, the material scientists also want to challenge the inconceivable potency of the Lord by measuring Him with their froglike brains and their scientific achievements, but at the end they simply die unsuccessfully, like the frog.

Sometimes a materially powerful man is accepted as God or the incarnation of God without any knowledge of the factual God. Such a material assessment may be gradually extended, and the attempt may reach to the highest limit of Brahmājī, who is the topmost living being within the universe and has a duration of life unimaginable to the material scientist. As we get information from the most authentic book of knowledge, the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17) , Brahmājī’s one day and night is calculated to be some hundreds of thousands of years on our planet. This long duration of life may not be believed by “the frog in the well,” but persons who have a realization of the truths mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā accept the existence of a great personality who creates the variegatedness of the complete universe. It is understood from the revealed scriptures that the Brahmājī of this universe is younger than all the other Brahmās in charge of the many, many universes beyond this, but none of them can be equal to the Personality of Godhead.

Nāradajī is one of the liberated souls, and after his liberation he was known as Nārada; otherwise, before his liberation, he was simply a son of a maidservant. The questions may be asked why Nāradajī was not aware of the Supreme Lord and why he misconceived Brahmājī to be the Supreme Lord, although factually he was not. A liberated soul is never bewildered by such a mistaken idea, so why did Nāradajī ask all those questions just like an ordinary man with a poor fund of knowledge? There was such bewilderment in Arjuna also, although he is eternally the associate of the Lord. Such bewilderment in Arjuna or in Nārada takes place by the will of the Lord so that other, nonliberated persons may realize the real truth and knowledge of the Lord. The doubt arising in the mind of Nārada about Brahmājī’s becoming all-powerful is a lesson for the frogs in the well, that they may not be bewildered in misconceiving the identity of the Personality of Godhead (even by comparison to a personality like Brahmā, so what to speak of ordinary men who falsely pose themselves as God or an incarnation of God). The Supreme Lord is always the Supreme, and as we have tried to establish many times in these purports, no living being, even up to the standard of Brahmā, can claim to be one with the Lord. One should not be misled when people worship a great man as God after his death as a matter of hero worship. There were many kings like Lord Rāmacandra, the King of Ayodhyā, but none of them are mentioned as God in the revealed scriptures. To be a good king is not necessarily the qualification for being Lord Rāma, but to be a great personality like Kṛṣṇa is the qualification for being the Personality of Godhead. If we scrutinize the characters who took part in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, we may find that Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was no less a pious king than Lord Rāmacandra, and by character study Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was a better moralist than Lord Kṛṣṇa. Lord Kṛṣṇa asked Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to lie, but Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira protested. But that does not mean that Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira could be equal to Lord Rāmacandra or Lord Kṛṣṇa. The great authorities have estimated Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to be a pious man, but they have accepted Lord Rāma or Kṛṣṇa as the Personality of Godhead. The Lord is therefore a different identity in all circumstances, and no idea of anthropomorphism can be applied to Him. The Lord is always the Lord, and a common living being can never be equal to Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O son! What you say about me is not untrue, because people, not knowing the difference between me and the Lord say that I have that power.
Commentary

Moreover, O son! It is not untrue when you say that I alone create the living beings (ekaḥ sṛjasi bhūtāni), because if one does not know the difference between myself and the Lord, it will appear that I am in that position. Using two different subjects for the participle and the main verb is poetic license. Or it can mean “because of not distinguishing the Supreme Lord (param) from me (mattaḥ), people think me to be that Supreme Lord (etāvat).” Though you are omniscient, you speak as they speak, just in order to educate them. It should not be said that Nārada speaks like this because he does not understand the difference between the Lord and Brahmā. It would be improper for Brahmā to think that Nārada was ignorant.

Without knowing the true Supreme, we naturally mistake powerful beings — or powerful humans — for God. The 'frog in the well' cannot conceive the ocean. Until we know the actual Source, every assessment of greatness is provisional.
Reflection Questions
  • Which powerful figure or idea in my life have I quietly elevated to the place of God?
  • Where is my 'well' — the boundary of what I currently can imagine being possible?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.11

↗
येन स्वरोचिषा विश्वं रोचितं रोचयाम्यहम् । यथार्कोऽग्निर्यथा सोमो यथर्क्षग्रहतारका: ॥ ११ ॥
yena sva-rociṣā viśvaṁ
[yena sva-rochishaa vishvam]
rocitaṁ rocayāmy aham
[rochitam rochayaamy aham]
yathārko ’gnir yathā somo
[yathaarko ’gnir yathaa somo]
yatharkṣa-graha-tārakāḥ
[yatharksha-graha-taarakaah]
yena — by whom sva-rociṣā — by His own effulgence viśvam — all the world rocitam — already created by His potency rocayāmi — do manifest aham — I yathā — as much arkaḥ — the sun agniḥ — fire yathā — as somaḥ — the moon yathā — as also ṛkṣa — the firmament graha — the influential planets tārakāḥ — the stars.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yena sva-rociṣā viśvaṁ
yena
by whom
sva-rociṣā
by His own effulgence
viśvam
all the world
rocitaṁ rocayāmy aham
rocitam
already created by His potency
rocayāmi
do manifest
aham
I
yathārko ’gnir yathā somo
yathā
as much
arkaḥ
the sun
yatharkṣa-graha-tārakāḥ
agniḥ
fire
yathā
as
somaḥ
the moon
yathā
as also
ṛkṣa
the firmament
graha
the influential planets
tārakāḥ
the stars.
I create after the Lord’s creation by His personal effulgence [known as the brahmajyoti], just as when the sun manifests its fire, the moon, the firmament, the influential planets and the twinkling stars also manifest their brightness.

Lord Brahmājī said to Nārada that his impression that Brahmā was not the supreme authority in the creation was correct. Sometimes less intelligent men have the foolish impression that Brahmā is the cause of all causes. But Nārada wanted to clear the matter by the statements of Brahmājī, the supreme authority in the universe. As the decision of the supreme court of a state is final, similarly the judgment of Brahmājī, the supreme authority in the universe, is final in the Vedic process of acquiring knowledge. As we have already affirmed in the previous verse, Nāradajī was a liberated soul; therefore, he was not one of the less intelligent men who accept a false god or gods in their own ways. He represented himself as less intelligent and yet intelligently presented a doubt to be cleared by the supreme authority so that the uninformed might take note of it and be rightly informed about the intricacies of the creation and the creator.

In this verse Brahmājī clears up the wrong impression held by the less intelligent and affirms that he creates the universal variegatedness after the creation by the glaring effulgence of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Brahmājī has also separately given this statement in the saṁhitā known as the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.40) , where he says:

yasya prabhā prabhavato jagad-aṇḍa-koṭi- koṭiṣv aśeṣa-vasudhādi-vibhūti-bhinnam tad brahma niṣkalam anantam aśeṣa-bhūtaṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

“I serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead Govinda, the primeval Lord, whose transcendental bodily effulgence, known as the brahmajyoti, which is unlimited, unfathomed and all-pervasive, is the cause of the creation of unlimited numbers of planets, etc., with varieties of climates and specific conditions of life.”

The same statement is in the Bhagavad-gītā (14.27) . Lord Kṛṣṇa is the background of the brahmajyoti ( brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭhāham ). In the Nirukti, or Vedic dictionary, the import of pratiṣṭhā is mentioned as “that which establishes.” So the brahmajyoti is not independent or self-sufficient. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is ultimately the creator of the brahmajyoti, mentioned in this verse as sva-rociṣā, or the effulgence of the transcendental body of the Lord. This brahmajyoti is all-pervading, and all creation is made possible by its power; therefore the Vedic hymns declare that everything that exists is being sustained by the brahmajyoti ( sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma ). Therefore the potent seed of all creation is the brahmajyoti, and the same brahmajyoti, unlimited and unfathomed, is established by the Lord. Therefore the Lord (Śrī Kṛṣṇa) is ultimately the supreme cause of all creation ( ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ).

One should not expect the Lord to create like a blacksmith with a hammer and other instruments. The Lord creates by His potencies. He has His multifarious potencies ( parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate ). Just as the small seed of a banyan fruit has the potency to create a big banyan tree, the Lord disseminates all varieties of seeds by His potent brahmajyoti ( sva-rociṣā ), and the seeds are made to develop by the watering process of persons like Brahmā. Brahmā cannot create the seeds, but he can manifest the seed into a tree, just as a gardener helps plants and orchards to grow by the watering process. The example cited here of the sun is very appropriate. In the material world the sun is the cause of all illumination: fire, electricity, the rays of the moon, etc. All luminaries in the sky are creations of the sun, the sun is the creation of the brahmajyoti, and the brahmajyoti is the effulgence of the Lord. Thus the ultimate cause of creation is the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I manifest the universe which is manifested by the self-manifesting Lord, just as the sun, fire, moon, constellations, planets and stars illuminate only what the Lord chooses to illuminate.
Commentary

Actually I am very insignificant. I manifest the universe which is already manifested by the self-manifesting Lord (sva-rociṣā), like grinding what is already ground, just as the sun and other luminaries reveal what is already revealed by the Lord. The śruti says:

na tatra sūryo bhāti na candra-tārakaṁ nemā vidyuto bhānti kuto ’yam agniḥ | tam eva bhāntam anu bhāti sarvaṁ tasya bhāsā sarvam idaṁ vibhāti ||

There, the sun, the moon, the stars, fire and lightning do not shine. They all shine only by following the shining Lord. His light illuminates all these. Kaṭha Upaniṣad 5.15

Even the highest secondary creator works under the original light of the Supreme — like the moon and stars borrowing the sun's brightness. Acknowledging this hierarchy is not weakness; it is accuracy. We shine by reflected light.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my work am I claiming brightness that is actually reflected light?
  • How does seeing myself as a 'moon' instead of a 'sun' change how I show up?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.12

↗
तस्मै नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय धीमहि । यन्मायया दुर्जयया मां वदन्ति जगद्गुरुम् ॥ १२ ॥
tasmai namo bhagavate
[tasmai namo bhagavate]
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
[vaasudevaaya dheemahi]
yan-māyayā durjayayā
[yan-maayayaa durjayayaa]
māṁ vadanti jagad-gurum
[maam vadanti jagad-gurum]
tasmai — unto Him namaḥ — offer my obeisances bhagavate — unto the Personality of Godhead vāsudevāya — unto Lord Kṛṣṇa dhīmahi — do meditate upon Him yat — by whose māyayā — potencies durjayayā — invincible mām — unto me vadanti — they say jagat — the world gurum — the master.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmai namo bhagavate
tasmai
unto Him
namaḥ
offer my obeisances
bhagavate
unto the Personality of Godhead
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
vāsudevāya
unto Lord Kṛṣṇa
dhīmahi
do meditate upon Him
yan-māyayā durjayayā
yat
by whose
māyayā
potencies
durjayayā
invincible
māṁ vadanti jagad-gurum
mām
unto me
vadanti
they say
jagat
the world
gurum
the master.
I offer my obeisances and meditate upon Lord Kṛṣṇa [Vāsudeva], the Personality of Godhead, whose invincible potency influences them [the less intelligent class of men] to call me the supreme controller.

As will be more clearly explained in the next verse, the illusory potency of the Lord bewilders the less intelligent to accept Brahmājī, or for that matter any other person, as the Supreme Lord. Brahmājī, however, refuses to be called this, and he directly offers his respectful obeisances unto Lord Vāsudeva, or Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, as he has already offered the same respects to Him in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.1) :

īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ anādir ādir govindaḥ sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam

“The Supreme Lord is the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the primeval Lord in His transcendental body, the ultimate cause of all causes. I worship that primeval Lord Govinda.”

Brahmājī is conscious of his actual position, and he knows how less intelligent persons, bewildered by the illusory energy of the Lord, whimsically accept anyone and everyone as God. A responsible personality like Brahmājī refuses to be addressed as the Supreme Lord by his disciples or subordinates, but foolish persons praised by men of the nature of dogs, hogs, camels and asses feel flattered to be addressed as the Supreme Lord. Why such persons take pleasure in being addressed as God, or why such persons are addressed as God by foolish admirers, is explained in the following verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I meditate on the Supreme Lord Vāsudeva, by whose insurmountable māyā people call me the guru of the universe.
Commentary

But are you not known everywhere as the guru of the universe who creates the worlds? With surprise and derision he speaks.

A truly responsible person refuses worship that doesn't belong to them and directs it to its proper object — Kṛṣṇa. The illusory potency tempts followers to inflate their leaders; integrity is to bow lower, not stand taller.
Reflection Questions
  • When others praise me beyond what I deserve, do I redirect it or quietly accept it?
  • Whom do I bow to when no one is watching?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.13

↗
विलज्जमानया यस्य स्थातुमीक्षापथेऽमुया । विमोहिता विकत्थन्ते ममाहमिति दुर्धिय: ॥ १३ ॥
vilajjamānayā yasya
[vilajjamaanayaa yasya]
sthātum īkṣā-pathe ’muyā
[sthaatum eekshaa-pathe ’muyaa]
vimohitā vikatthante
[vimohitaa vikatthante]
mamāham iti durdhiyaḥ
[mamaaham iti durdhiyah]
vilajjamānayā — by one who is ashamed yasya — whose sthātum — to stay īkṣā-pathe — in front amuyā — by the bewildering energy vimohitāḥ — those who are bewildered vikatthante — talk nonsense mama — it is mine aham — I am everything iti — thus vituperating durdhiyaḥ — thus ill conceived.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vilajjamānayā yasya
vilajjamānayā
by one who is ashamed
yasya
whose
sthātum īkṣā-pathe ’muyā
sthātum
to stay
īkṣā-pathe
in front
vimohitā vikatthante
mamāham iti durdhiyaḥ
amuyā
by the bewildering energy
vimohitāḥ
those who are bewildered
vikatthante
talk nonsense
mama
it is mine
aham
I am everything
iti
thus vituperating
durdhiyaḥ
thus ill conceived.
The illusory energy of the Lord cannot take precedence, being ashamed of her position, but those who are bewildered by her always talk nonsense, being absorbed in thoughts of “It is I” and “It is mine.”

The invincibly powerful deluding energy of the Personality of God, or the third energy, representing nescience, can bewilder the entire world of animation, but still she is not strong enough to be able to stand in front of the Supreme Lord. Nescience is behind the Personality of Godhead, where she is powerful enough to mislead the living beings, and the primary symptom of bewildered persons is that they talk nonsense. Nonsensical talks are not supported by the principles of Vedic literatures, and first-grade nonsense talk is “It is I,” “It is mine.” A godless civilization is exclusively conducted by such false ideas, and such persons, without any factual realization of God, accept a false God or falsely declare themselves to be God to mislead persons who are already bewildered by the deluding energy. Those who are before the Lord, however, and who surrender unto Him, cannot be influenced by the deluding energy; therefore they are free from the misconception of “It is I,” “It is mine,” and therefore they do not accept a false God or pose themselves as equal to the Supreme Lord. Identification of the bewildered person is distinctly given in this verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The ignorant jīvas, bewildered by māyā who is ashamed to stand in sight of the Lord, boast about “I” and “mine.”
Commentary

Are those who respect you as the guru of the universe and its creator bewildered by māyā? Yes. Those who give respect and receive respect without reference to the Lord are bewildered by māyā who is situated at the back of the Lord, beyond his vision. That is expressed in this verse. Knowing that she deceives, she is ashamed to stand in sight, like a deceitful woman, she stands behind the Lord. Bewildered by her, people boast. Being situated behind the Lord also indicates that she is not facing the Lord. Because she is not facing the Lord her influence does not approach him at all.

The signature of bewilderment is obsessive 'I' and 'mine' talk. Those surrendered to the Lord lose this constriction and stop posing as either God or God's competitor. Watch your speech for the markers of illusion.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of my recent talk has revolved around 'I' and 'mine'?
  • What practice could loosen the grip of 'me-and-mine' on my attention today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.14

↗
द्रव्यं कर्म च कालश्च स्वभावो जीव एव च । वासुदेवात्परो ब्रह्मन्न च चान्योऽर्थोऽस्ति तत्त्वत: ॥ १४ ॥
dravyaṁ karma ca kālaś ca
[dravyam karma cha kaalash cha]
svabhāvo jīva eva ca
[svabhaavo jeeva eva cha]
vāsudevāt paro brahman
[vaasudevaat paro brahman]
na cānyo ’rtho ’sti tattvataḥ
[na chaanyo ’rtho ’sti tattvatah]
dravyam — the ingredients (earth, water, fire, air and sky) karma — the interaction ca — and kālaḥ — eternal time ca — also sva-bhāvaḥ — intuition or nature jīvaḥ — the living being eva — certainly ca — and vāsudevāt — from Vāsudeva paraḥ — differentiated parts brahman — O brāhmaṇa na — never ca — also anyaḥ — separate arthaḥ — value asti — there is tattvataḥ — in truth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dravyaṁ karma ca kālaś ca
dravyam
the ingredients (earth, water, fire, air and sky)
karma
the interaction
ca
and
kālaḥ
eternal time
ca
also
svabhāvo jīva eva ca
sva-bhāvaḥ
intuition or nature
jīvaḥ
the living being
eva
certainly
ca
and
vāsudevāt paro brahman
vāsudevāt
from Vāsudeva
paraḥ
differentiated parts
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
na cānyo ’rtho ’sti tattvataḥ
na
never
ca
also
anyaḥ
separate
arthaḥ
value
asti
there is
tattvataḥ
in truth.
The five elementary ingredients of creation, the interaction thereof set up by eternal time, and the intuition or nature of the individual living beings are all differentiated parts and parcels of the Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva, and in truth there is no other value in them.

This phenomenal world is impersonally the representation of Vāsudeva because the ingredients of its creation, their interaction and the enjoyer of the resultant action, the living being, are all produced by the external and internal energies of Lord Kṛṣṇa. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.4-5). The ingredients, namely earth, water, fire, air and sky, as well as the conception of material identity, intelligence and the mind, are produced of the external energy of the Lord. The living entity who enjoys the interaction of the above gross and subtle ingredients, as set up by eternal time, is an offshoot of internal potency, with freedom to remain either in the material world or in the spiritual world. In the material world the living entity is enticed by deluding nescience, but in the spiritual world he is in the normal condition of spiritual existence without any delusion. The living entity is known as the marginal potency of the Lord. But in all circumstances, neither the material ingredients nor the spiritual parts and parcels are independent of the Personality of Godhead Vāsudeva, for all things, whether products of the external, internal or marginal potencies of the Lord, are simply displays of the same effulgence of the Lord, just as light, heat and smoke are displays of fire. None of them is separate from the fire — all of them combine together to be called fire. Similarly, all phenomenal manifestations, as well as the effulgence of the body of Vāsudeva, are His impersonal features, whereas He eternally exists in His transcendental form called sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ, distinct from all conceptions of the material ingredients mentioned above.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇa! The elements, karma, time, svabhāva and the jīva are not different from Vāsudeva. Nothing but he exists in truth.
Commentary

Ten questions were asked about the universe, starting with its characteristics (yad-rūpam). To answer this, first it is explained that nothing exists other than the Lord. Dravyam means the elements, the substance of matter (upādāna). Karma is the cause of birth. Kāla is the agitator of the guṇas. Svabhāva is the cause of the change in the guṇas. Jīva is the enjoyer. None of these exist apart from the Lord, because the items, except the jīva, are the effects of māyā, and māyā and the jīva are energies of the Lord. The universe is thus a form of Vāsudeva. Thus the answer to the question about the characteristic of the universe (yad-rūpam) is given.

Elements, time, and the inner nature of beings are all expressions of one Person — Vāsudeva. The world is not a heap of independent forces; it is one Being's energies in play. Nothing here is finally separate from Him.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I experience matter, time, and my own nature as scattered, or as connected to one Person?
  • What changes when I treat every element around me as belonging to Vāsudeva?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.15

↗
नारायणपरा वेदा देवा नारायणाङ्गजा: । नारायणपरा लोका नारायणपरा मखा: ॥ १५ ॥
nārāyaṇa-parā vedā
[naaraayana-paraa vedaa]
devā nārāyaṇāṅgajāḥ
[devaa naaraayanaangajaah]
nārāyaṇa-parā lokā
[naaraayana-paraa lokaa]
nārāyaṇa-parā makhāḥ
[naaraayana-paraa makhaah]
nārāyaṇa — the Supreme Lord parāḥ — is the cause and is meant for vedāḥ — knowledge devāḥ — the demigods nārāyaṇa — the Supreme Lord aṅga-jāḥ — assisting hands nārāyaṇa — the Personality of Godhead parāḥ — for the sake of lokāḥ — the planets nārāyaṇa — the Supreme Lord parāḥ — just to please Him makhāḥ — all sacrifices.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārāyaṇa-parā vedā
nārāyaṇa
the Supreme Lord
parāḥ
is the cause and is meant for
vedāḥ
knowledge
devā nārāyaṇāṅgajāḥ
devāḥ
the demigods
nārāyaṇa
the Supreme Lord
aṅga-jāḥ
assisting hands
nārāyaṇa-parā lokā
nārāyaṇa
the Personality of Godhead
parāḥ
for the sake of
lokāḥ
the planets
nārāyaṇa-parā makhāḥ
nārāyaṇa
the Supreme Lord
parāḥ
just to please Him
makhāḥ
all sacrifices.
The Vedic literatures are made by and are meant for the Supreme Lord, the demigods are also meant for serving the Lord as parts of His body, the different planets are also meant for the sake of the Lord, and different sacrifices are performed just to please Him.

According to the Vedānta-sūtras ( śāstra-yonitvāt ), the Supreme Lord is the author of all revealed scriptures, and all revealed scriptures are for knowing the Supreme Lord. Veda means knowledge that leads to the Lord. The Vedas are made just to revive the forgotten consciousness of the conditioned souls, and any literature not meant for reviving God consciousness is rejected at once by the nārāyaṇa-para devotees. Such deluding books of knowledge, not having Nārāyaṇa as their aim, are not at all knowledge, but are the playgrounds for crows who are interested in the rejected refuse of the world. Any book of knowledge (science or art) must lead to the knowledge of Nārāyaṇa; otherwise it must be rejected. That is the way of advancement of knowledge. The supreme worshipable Deity is Nārāyaṇa. The demigods are recommended secondarily for worship in relation to Nārāyaṇa because the demigods are assisting hands in the management of the universal affairs. As the officers of a kingdom are respected due to their relation to the king, the demigods are worshiped due to their relation to the Lord. Without the Lord’s relation, worship of the demigods is unauthorized ( avidhi-pūrvakam ), just as it is improper to water the leaves and branches of a tree without watering its root. Therefore the demigods are also dependent on Nārāyaṇa. The lokas, or different planets, are attractive because they have different varieties of life and bliss partially representing the sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha. Everyone wants the eternal life of bliss and knowledge. In the material world such an eternal life of bliss and knowledge is progressively realized in the upper planets, but after reaching there one is inclined to achieve further progress along the path back to Godhead. Duration of life, with a proportionate quantity of bliss and knowledge, may be increased from one planet to another. One can increase the duration of life to thousands and hundreds of thousands of years in different planets, but nowhere is there eternal life. But one who can reach the highest planet, that of Brahmā, can aspire to reach the planets in the spiritual sky, where life is eternal. Therefore, the progressive journey from one planet to another culminates in reaching the supreme planet of the Lord ( mad-dhāma ), where life is eternal and full of bliss and knowledge. All different kinds of sacrifice are performed just to satisfy Lord Nārāyaṇa with a view to reach Him, and the best sacrifice recommended in this Age of Kali is saṅkīrtana-yajña, the mainstay of the devotional service of a nārāyaṇa-para devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Vedas are dependent on Nārāyaṇa. The devatās are the born from the limbs of Nārāyaṇa. The planets and sacrifices are dependent on Nārāyaṇa.
Commentary

Nārāyaṇa is the cause (paraḥ) of these. This is proof of the Lord, and also indicates his qualities such as omniscience. This affirms the statement śāstra-yonitvāt. Everything is nārāyaṇa-paraḥ because everything is situated in Nārāyaṇa and dependent on Nārāyaṇa. This answers the questions about the shelter of the universe and dependence of the universe.

Scripture, demigods, planets, and sacrifices all exist for the Supreme Lord's service. Knowledge that does not point toward Him is, by this standard, not real knowledge. Every legitimate worship is part of one orientation.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'knowledge' in my life points me toward the Lord, and which simply distracts?
  • What would it mean to make my work, study, or worship part of one centered orientation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.16

↗
नारायणपरो योगो नारायणपरं तप: । नारायणपरं ज्ञानं नारायणपरा गति: ॥ १६ ॥
nārāyaṇa-paro yogo
[naaraayana-paro yogo]
nārāyaṇa-paraṁ tapaḥ
[naaraayana-param tapah]
nārāyaṇa-paraṁ jñānaṁ
[naaraayana-param jnaanam]
nārāyaṇa-parā gatiḥ
[naaraayana-paraa gatih]
nārāyaṇa-paraḥ — just to know Nārāyaṇa yogaḥ — concentration of mind nārāyaṇa-param — just with an aim to achieve Nārāyaṇa tapaḥ — austerity nārāyaṇa-param — just to realize a glimpse of Nārāyaṇa jñānam — culture of transcendental knowledge nārāyaṇa-parā — the path of salvation ends by entering the kingdom of Nārāyaṇa gatiḥ — progressive path.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārāyaṇa-paro yogo
nārāyaṇa-paraḥ
just to know Nārāyaṇa
yogaḥ
concentration of mind
nārāyaṇa-paraṁ tapaḥ
nārāyaṇa-param
just with an aim to achieve Nārāyaṇa
tapaḥ
austerity
nārāyaṇa-paraṁ jñānaṁ
nārāyaṇa-param
just to realize a glimpse of Nārāyaṇa
jñānam
culture of transcendental knowledge
nārāyaṇa-parā gatiḥ
nārāyaṇa-parā
the path of salvation ends by entering the kingdom of Nārāyaṇa
gatiḥ
progressive path.
All different types of meditation or mysticism are means for realizing Nārāyaṇa. All austerities are aimed at achieving Nārāyaṇa. Culture of transcendental knowledge is for getting a glimpse of Nārāyaṇa, and ultimately salvation is entering the kingdom of Nārāyaṇa.

In meditation, there are two systems of yoga, namely aṣṭāṅga-yoga and sāṅkhya-yoga. Aṣṭāṅga-yoga is practice in concentrating the mind, releasing oneself from all engagements by the regulative processes of meditation, concentration, sitting postures, blocking the movements of the internal circulation of air, etc. Sāṅkhya-yoga is meant to distinguish the truth from ephemerals. But ultimately both systems are meant for realizing the impersonal Brahman, which is but a partial representation of Nārāyaṇa, the Personality of Godhead. As we have explained before, the impersonal Brahman effulgence is only a part of the Personality of Godhead. Impersonal Brahman is situated on the person of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and, as such, Brahman is the glorification of the Personality of the Godhead. This is confirmed both in the Bhagavad-gītā and in the Matsya Purāṇa. Gati refers to the ultimate destination, or the last word in liberation. Oneness with the impersonal brahmajyoti is not ultimate liberation; superior to that is the sublime association of the Personality of Godhead in one of the innumerable spiritual planets in the Vaikuṇṭha sky. Therefore the conclusion is that Nārāyaṇa, or the Personality of Godhead, is the ultimate destination for all kinds of yoga systems as well as all kinds of liberation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Yoga is dependent on Nārāyaṇa. Austerity is dependent on Nārāyaṇa. Knowledge is dependent on Nārāyaṇa. Liberation is dependent on Nārāyaṇa.
Commentary

Gatiḥ means liberation.

Meditation, austerity, learning, and liberation are all aimed — knowingly or not — at Nārāyaṇa. Even impersonal practices ultimately rest on Him. The goal is not just to escape matter, but to enter loving association with the Person.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I content with merging or quieting, or do I want personal relationship with the Source?
  • If every practice I do points toward Nārāyaṇa, what should I adjust today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.17

↗
तस्यापि द्रष्टुरीशस्य कूटस्थस्याखिलात्मन: । सृज्यं सृजामि सृष्टोऽहमीक्षयैवाभिचोदित: ॥ १७ ॥
tasyāpi draṣṭur īśasya
[tasyaapi drashtur eeshasya]
kūṭa-sthasyākhilātmanaḥ
[koota-sthasyaakhilaatmanah]
sṛjyaṁ sṛjāmi sṛṣṭo ’ham
[srijyam srijaami srishto ’ham]
īkṣayaivābhicoditaḥ
[eekshayaivaabhichoditah]
tasya — His api — certainly draṣṭuḥ — of the seer īśasya — of the controller kūṭa-sthasya — of the one who is over everyone’s intelligence akhila-ātmanaḥ — of the Supersoul sṛjyam — that which is already created sṛjāmi — do I discover sṛṣṭaḥ — created aham — myself īkṣayā — by glance over eva — exactly abhicoditaḥ — being inspired by Him.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyāpi draṣṭur īśasya
tasya
His
api
certainly
draṣṭuḥ
of the seer
īśasya
of the controller
kūṭa-sthasyākhilātmanaḥ
kūṭa-sthasya
of the one who is over everyone’s intelligence
akhila-ātmanaḥ
of the Supersoul
sṛjyaṁ sṛjāmi sṛṣṭo ’ham
sṛjyam
that which is already created
sṛjāmi
do I discover
sṛṣṭaḥ
created
īkṣayaivābhicoditaḥ
aham
myself
īkṣayā
by glance over
eva
exactly
abhicoditaḥ
being inspired by Him.
Inspired by Him only, I discover what is already created by Him [Nārāyaṇa] under His vision as the all-pervading Supersoul, and I also am created by Him only.

Even Brahmā, the creator of the universe, admits that he is not the actual creator but is simply inspired by the Lord Nārāyaṇa and therefore creates under His superintendence those things already created by Him, the Supersoul of all living entities. Two identities of soul, the Supersoul and the individual soul, are admitted to be in the living entity, even by the greatest authority of the universe. The Supersoul is the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, whereas the individual soul is the eternal servitor of the Lord. The Lord inspires the individual soul to create what is already created by the Lord, and by the good will of the Lord a discoverer of something in the world is accredited as the discoverer. It is said that Columbus discovered the Western Hemisphere, but actually the tract of land was not created by Columbus. The vast tract of land was already there by the omnipotency of the Supreme Lord, and Columbus, by dint of his past service unto the Lord, was blessed with the credit of discovering America. Similarly, no one can create anything without the sanction of the Lord, since everyone sees according to his ability. This ability is also awarded by the Lord according to one’s willingness to render service unto the Lord. One must therefore be voluntarily willing to render service unto the Lord, and thus the Lord will empower the doer in proportion to his surrender unto the lotus feet of the Lord. Lord Brahmā is a great devotee of the Lord; therefore he has been empowered or inspired by the Lord to create such a universe as the one manifested before us. The Lord also inspired Arjuna to fight in the field of Kurukṣetra as follows:

tasmāt tvam uttiṣṭha yaśo labhasva jitvā śatrūn bhuṅkṣva rājyaṁ samṛddham mayaivaite nihatāḥ pūrvam eva nimitta-mātraṁ bhava savyasācin

(Bg. 11.33)

The Battle of Kurukṣetra, or any other battle at any place or at any time, is made by the will of the Lord, for no one can arrange such mass annihilation without the sanction of the Lord. The party of Duryodhana insulted Draupadī, a great devotee of Kṛṣṇa, and she appealed to the Lord as well as to all the silent observers of this unwarranted insult. Arjuna was then advised by the Lord to fight and take credit; otherwise the party of Duryodhana would be killed anyway by the will of the Lord. So Arjuna was advised just to become the agent and take the credit for killing great generals like Bhīṣma and Karṇa.

In the Vedic writings such as the Kaṭha Upaniṣad, the Lord is described as the sarva-bhūta-antarātmā, or the Personality of Godhead who resides in everyone’s body and who directs everything for one who is a soul surrendered unto Him. Those who are not surrendered souls are put under the care of the material nature ( bhrāmayan sarva-bhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā ); therefore, they are allowed to do things on their own account and suffer the consequences themselves. Devotees like Brahmā and Arjuna do not do anything on their own account, but as fully surrendered souls they always await indications from the Lord; therefore they attempt to do something which appears very wonderful to ordinary vision. One of the Lord’s names is Urukrama, or one whose actions are very wonderful and are beyond the imagination of the living being, so the actions of His devotees sometimes appear very wonderful due to the direction of the Lord. Beginning from Brahmā, the topmost intelligent living entity within the universe, down to the smallest ant, every living entity’s intelligence is overseen by the Lord in His transcendental position as the witness of all actions. The subtle presence of the Lord is felt by the intelligent man who can study the psychic effects of thinking, feeling and willing.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I am created by him. Inspired by the Lord’s glance, I create what is already created by the Lord -- the witness, the soul situated in all beings.
Commentary

Then what do you do? I create what he has already created. Do you do this by your own decision? No, I do it by his glance, by his direction (īkṣayā). It cannot be otherwise since he witnesses what I do (draṣṭuḥ) and controls it, and he is the soul (kūṭa-sthasya) within all beings. This indicates that he is the Lord and Brahmā is a jīva. Śruti says:

eko devaḥ sarva-bhūteṣu gūḍhaḥ sarva-vyāpī sarva-bhūtāntarātmā | karmādhyakṣaḥ sarva-bhūtādhivāsaḥ sākṣī cetā kevalo nirguṇaś ca ||

He is the one Lord situated in all beings. He is all-pervading, dwelling within all beings as their soul. He is the controller of action, the abode of all beings, the witness, the consciousness, pure, without any trace of material qualities. Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.11

eṣa bhūtādhipatir eṣa lokeśvaro loka-pālaḥ

He is the Lord of all beings, the Lord of all planets and the protector of all planets. Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 4.4.22

Because he is present in the intelligence of all entities, without distinction from Brahmā to the ant, and recognized as such, he is said to be kūtastha, uniformly situated.

Related verses
Even Brahmā admits he only rearranges what the Lord already arranged. Discoverers don't create what they find. Our most original work is actually inspired participation in something pre-existing.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'discovery' or achievement of mine was actually a gift I was permitted to receive?
  • How could I work today as one who is inspired rather than as the originator?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.18

↗
सत्त्वं रजस्तम इति निर्गुणस्य गुणास्त्रय: । स्थितिसर्गनिरोधेषु गृहीता मायया विभो: ॥ १८ ॥
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti
[sattvam rajas tama iti]
nirguṇasya guṇās trayaḥ
[nirgunasya gunaas trayah]
sthiti-sarga-nirodheṣu
[sthiti-sarga-nirodheshu]
gṛhītā māyayā vibhoḥ
[griheetaa maayayaa vibhoh]
sattvam — the mode of goodness rajaḥ — the mode of passion tamaḥ — the mode of ignorance iti — all these nirguṇasya — of the Transcendence guṇāḥ trayaḥ — are three qualities sthiti — maintenance sarga — creation nirodheṣu — in destruction gṛhītāḥ — accepted māyayā — by the external energy vibhoḥ — of the Supreme.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sattvaṁ rajas tama iti
sattvam
the mode of goodness
rajaḥ
the mode of passion
tamaḥ
the mode of ignorance
iti
all these
nirguṇasya guṇās trayaḥ
nirguṇasya
of the Transcendence
guṇāḥ trayaḥ
are three qualities
sthiti
maintenance
sthiti-sarga-nirodheṣu
sarga
creation
nirodheṣu
in destruction
gṛhītā māyayā vibhoḥ
gṛhītāḥ
accepted
māyayā
by the external energy
vibhoḥ
of the Supreme.
The Supreme Lord is pure, spiritual form, transcendental to all material qualities, yet for the sake of the creation of the material world and its maintenance and annihilation, He accepts through His external energy the material modes of nature called goodness, passion and ignorance.

The Supreme Lord is the master of the external energy manifested by the three material modes, namely goodness, passion and ignorance, and as master of this energy He is ever unaffected by the influence of such bewildering energy. The living entities, the jīvas, however, are affected by or susceptible to being influenced by such modes of material nature — that is the difference between the Lord and the living entities. The living entities are subjected by those qualities, although originally the living entities are qualitatively one with the Lord. In other words, the material modes of nature, being products of the energy of the Lord, are certainly connected with the Lord, but the connection is just like that between the master and the servants. The Supreme Lord is the controller of the material energy, whereas the living entities, who are entangled in the material world, are neither masters nor controllers. Rather, they become subordinate to or controlled by such energy. Factually the Lord is eternally manifested by His internal potency or spiritual energy just like the sun and its rays in the clear sky, but at times He creates the material energy, as the sun creates a cloud in the clear sky. As the sun is ever increasingly unaffected by a spot of cloud, so also the unlimited Lord is unaffected by the spot of material energy manifested at times in the unlimited span of the Lord’s rays of brahmajyoti.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The three guṇas of sattva, rajas and tamas, belonging to the Lord without guṇas, are accepted by the māyā of the Lord for creation, maintenance and destruction.
Commentary

How does this distinction between the jīva and īśvara come about? Is it because you are inspired and he inspires? Three verses explain the cause of distinction. The three guṇas belong to the Lord who has no material guṇas. How is this? They are accepted by māyā of the Lord for creation, maintenance and destruction. They are his guṇas since they are the guṇas of his śakti, māyā. Though māyā eternally possesses this form as the guṇas, the word “accepts” is used, as if it has a beginning. The usage is the same as tasyecchayātta-vapuṣaḥ: Kṛṣṇa accepts a body by his will. (SB 10.33.34) Actually Kṛṣṇa eternally has the form of a human. This simply follows common expression.

Related verses
The Lord uses goodness, passion, and ignorance to run the world without being touched by them — like the sun creating clouds it isn't dimmed by. We get tangled in the modes because we identify with them; He doesn't.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of the three modes is currently running my day, and do I know I am not it?
  • How does it help to remember that the One operating the modes is untouched by them?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.19

↗
कार्यकारणकर्तृत्वे द्रव्यज्ञानक्रियाश्रया: । बध्नन्ति नित्यदा मुक्तं मायिनं पुरुषं गुणा: ॥ १९ ॥
kārya-kāraṇa-kartṛtve
[kaarya-kaarana-kartritve]
dravya-jñāna-kriyāśrayāḥ
[dravya-jnaana-kriyaashrayaah]
badhnanti nityadā muktaṁ
[badhnanti nityadaa muktam]
māyinaṁ puruṣaṁ guṇāḥ
[maayinam purusham gunaah]
kārya — effect kāraṇa — cause kartṛtve — in activities dravya — material jñāna — knowledge kriyā-āśrayāḥ — manifested by such symptoms badhnanti — conditions nityadā — eternally muktam — transcendental māyinam — affected by material energy puruṣam — the living entity guṇāḥ — the material modes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kārya-kāraṇa-kartṛtve
kārya
effect
kāraṇa
cause
kartṛtve
in activities
dravya-jñāna-kriyāśrayāḥ
dravya
material
jñāna
knowledge
kriyā-āśrayāḥ
manifested by such symptoms
badhnanti nityadā muktaṁ
badhnanti
conditions
nityadā
eternally
muktam
transcendental
māyinaṁ puruṣaṁ guṇāḥ
māyinam
affected by material energy
puruṣam
the living entity
guṇāḥ
the material modes.
These three modes of material nature, being further manifested as matter, knowledge and activities, put the eternally transcendental living entity under conditions of cause and effect and make him responsible for such activities.

Because they are between the internal and external potencies, the eternally transcendental living entities are called the marginal potency of the Lord. Factually, the living entities are not meant to be so conditioned by material energy, but due to their being affected by the false sense of lording it over the material energy, they come under the influence of such potency and thus become conditioned by the three modes of material nature. This external energy of the Lord covers up the pure knowledge of the living entity’s eternally existing with Him, but the covering is so constant that it appears that the conditioned soul is eternally ignorant. Such is the wonderful action of māyā, or external energy manifested as if materially produced. By the covering power of the material energy, the material scientist cannot look beyond the material causes, but factually, behind the material manifestations, there are adhibhūta, adhyātma and adhidaiva actions, which the conditioned soul in the mode of ignorance cannot see. The adhibhūta manifestation entails repetitions of births and deaths with old age and diseases, the adhyātma manifestation conditions the spirit soul, and the adhidaiva manifestation is the controlling system. These are the material manifestations of cause and effect and the sense of responsibility of the conditioned actors. They are, after all, manifestations of the conditioned state, and the human being’s freedom from such a conditioned state is the highest perfectional attainment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The guṇas -- the cause of matter, senses and the sense devatās -- binds the jīva who is associated with māyā, but who is actually composed of knowledge, with false identities of body, senses and mind.
Commentary

These guṇas bind the jīva (puruṣam), a function of the Lord’s taṭastha-śakti, who associates with māyā (māyinam). By the logic of the previous statement, it is possible for the jīvas who are situated behind the Lord to be influenced independently by māyā who is also situated behind the Lord. The jīva is called eternally liberated because he has beginningless knowledge just as he has beginningless ignorance. This will be made clear at the end of the seventh chapter. How does he get bound? The states of the guṇas are present as adhibhūta (kārya), adhyātmā (kāraṇa) and adhidaiva (kartṛtve). The guṇas are the shelter or causes of matter (dravya), the senses (kriyā) and the devatās (jñāna). The guṇas bind the jīva by these identities. The order of jñāna and kriya in the text should be reversed for proper understanding.

Wanting to be the lord of matter is exactly what binds us to matter. The modes condition us not because we are weak but because we mistake ourselves for the controller. Letting go of the lording wish is the first untangling.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying hardest to lord it over circumstances, and what is it costing me?
  • What would 'not the controller, but a servant' look like in my next decision?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.20

↗
स एष भगवाल्लिंङ्गैस्त्रिभिरेतैरधोक्षज: । स्वलक्षितगतिर्ब्रह्मन् सर्वेषां मम चेश्वर: ॥ २० ॥
sa eṣa bhagavāḻ liṅgais
[sa esha bhagavaaḻ lingais]
tribhir etair adhokṣajaḥ
[tribhir etair adhokshajah]
svalakṣita-gatir brahman
[svalakshita-gatir brahman]
sarveṣāṁ mama ceśvaraḥ
[sarveshaam mama cheshvarah]
saḥ — He eṣaḥ — this bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead liṅgaiḥ — by the symptoms tribhiḥ — by the three etaiḥ — by all these adhokṣajaḥ — the Superseer Transcendence su-alakṣita — veritably unseen gatiḥ — movement brahman — O Nārada sarveṣām — of everyone mama — mine ca — as also īśvaraḥ — the controller.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eṣa bhagavāḻ liṅgais
saḥ
He
eṣaḥ
this
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
liṅgaiḥ
by the symptoms
tribhir etair adhokṣajaḥ
tribhiḥ
by the three
etaiḥ
by all these
adhokṣajaḥ
the Superseer Transcendence
su-alakṣita
veritably unseen
svalakṣita-gatir brahman
gatiḥ
movement
brahman
O Nārada
sarveṣāṁ mama ceśvaraḥ
sarveṣām
of everyone
mama
mine
ca
as also
īśvaraḥ
the controller.
O Brāhmaṇa Nārada, the Superseer, the transcendent Lord, is beyond the perception of the material senses of the living entities because of the above-mentioned three modes of nature. But He is the controller of everyone, including me.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (7.24-25) the Lord has declared very clearly that the impersonalist, who gives more importance to the transcendental rays of the Lord as brahmajyoti and who concludes that the Absolute Truth is ultimately impersonal and only manifests a form at a time of necessity, is less intelligent than the personalist, however much the impersonalist may be engaged in studying the Vedānta. The fact is that such impersonalists are covered by the above-mentioned three modes of material nature; therefore, they are unable to approach the transcendental personality of the Lord. The Lord is not approachable by everyone because He is curtained by His yoga-māyā potency. But one should not wrongly conclude that the Lord was formerly unmanifested and has now manifested Himself in the human form. This misconception of the formlessness of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is due to the yoga-māyā curtain of the Lord and can be removed only by the Supreme Will, as soon as the conditioned soul surrenders unto Him. The devotees of the Lord who are transcendental to the above-mentioned three modes of material nature can see the all-blissful transcendental form of the Lord with their vision of love in the attitude of pure devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, who is brahman, who is the controller of me and all beings, is not known because of the covering of the three guṇas on the jīva.
Commentary

The Lord is the possessor of māyā-śakti. His nature (gatiḥ) is not known (su alakṣita) because of the coverings of the three guṇas on the jīvas. Or he is not known by the three guṇas. However he is known by his devotees with knowledge.

sattvaṁ na ced dhātar idaṁ nijaṁ bhaved vijñānam ajñāna-bhidāpamārjanam guṇa-prakāśair anumīyate bhavān prakāśate yasya ca yena vā guṇaḥ

O Lord, cause of all causes, if your transcendental body were not beyond the modes of material nature, one could not understand the difference between matter and transcendence. Only by your presence can one understand the transcendental nature of your Lordship, who are the controller of material nature. Your transcendental nature is very difficult to understand unless one is influenced by the presence of your transcendental form. SB 10.2.35

Related verses
The Lord is veiled by His own yoga-māyā and so is hidden from ordinary perception. His form is not invented later for our convenience; it is always there, hidden by a curtain only surrender can lift. Senses alone won't find Him.
Reflection Questions
  • What in me wants the Lord to be only impersonal so I don't have to relate personally?
  • What 'curtain' in my own life is asking to be lifted by surrender rather than effort?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.21

↗
कालं कर्म स्वभावं च मायेशो मायया स्वया । आत्मन् यद‍ृच्छया प्राप्तं विबुभूषुरुपाददे ॥ २१ ॥
kālaṁ karma svabhāvaṁ ca
[kaalam karma svabhaavam cha]
māyeśo māyayā svayā
[maayesho maayayaa svayaa]
ātman yadṛcchayā prāptaṁ
[aatman yadrichchayaa praaptam]
vibubhūṣur upādade
[vibubhooshur upaadade]
kālam — eternal time karma — the fate of the living entity svabhāvam — nature ca — also māyā — potency īśaḥ — the controller māyayā — by the energy svayā — of His own ātman (ātmani) — unto His Self yadṛcchayā — independently prāptam — being merged in vibubhūṣuḥ — appearing differently upādade — accepted for being created again.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kālaṁ karma svabhāvaṁ ca
kālam
eternal time
karma
the fate of the living entity
svabhāvam
nature
ca
also
māyeśo māyayā svayā
māyā
potency
īśaḥ
the controller
māyayā
by the energy
svayā
of His own
ātman yadṛcchayā prāptaṁ
ātman (ātmani)
unto His Self
yadṛcchayā
independently
prāptam
being merged in
vibubhūṣur upādade
vibubhūṣuḥ
appearing differently
upādade
accepted for being created again.
The Lord, who is the controller of all energies, thus creates, by His own potency, eternal time, the fate of all living entities, and their particular nature, for which they were created, and He again merges them independently.

The creation of the material world, wherein the conditioned souls are allowed to act subordinately by the Supreme Lord, takes place again and again after being repeatedly annihilated. The material creation is something like a cloud in the unlimited sky. The real sky is the spiritual sky, eternally filled with the rays of the brahmajyoti, and a portion of this unlimited sky is covered by the mahat-tattva cloud of the material creation, in which the conditioned souls, who want to lord it against the will of the Lord, are put into play as they desire, under the control of the Lord by the agency of His external energy. As the rainy season appears and disappears regularly, the creation takes place and is again annihilated under the control of the Lord, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.19) . So the creation and annihilation of the material worlds is a regular action of the Lord just to allow the conditioned souls to play as they like and thereby create their own fate of being differently created again in terms of their independent desires at the time of annihilation. The creation, therefore, takes place at a historical date (as we are accustomed to think of everything which has a beginning in our tiny experience). The process of creation and annihilation is called anādi, or without reference to date regarding the time the creation first took place, because the duration of even a partial creation is 8,640,000,000 years. The law of creation is, however, as mentioned in the Vedic literatures, that it is created at certain intervals and is again annihilated by the will of the Lord. The whole material or even the spiritual creation is a manifestation of the energy of the Lord, just as the light and heat of a fire are different manifestations of the fire’s energy. The Lord therefore exists in His impersonal form by such expansion of energy, and the complete creation rests on His impersonal feature. Nonetheless He keeps Himself distinct from such creation as the pūrṇam (or complete), and so no one should wrongly think that His personal feature is not existent due to His impersonal unlimited expansions. The impersonal expansion is a manifestation of His energy, and He is always in His personal feature despite His innumerable unlimited expansions of impersonal energies (Bg. 9.5-7). For human intelligence it is very difficult to conceive how the whole creation rests on His expansion of energy, but the Lord has given a very good example in the Bhagavad-gītā. It is said that although the air and the atoms rest within the huge expansion of the sky, which is like the resting reservoir of everything materially created, still the sky remains separate and unaffected. Similarly, although the Supreme Lord maintains everything created by His expansion of energy, He always remains separate. This is accepted even by Śaṅkarācārya, the great advocate of the impersonal form of the Absolute. He says nārāyaṇaḥ paro ’vyaktāt, or Nārāyaṇa exists separately, apart from the impersonal creative energy. The whole creation thus merges within the body of transcendental Nārāyaṇa at the time of annihilation, and the creation emanates from His body again with the same unchanging categories of fate and individual nature. The individual living entities, being parts and parcels of the Lord, are sometimes described as ātmā, qualitatively one in spiritual constitution. But because such living entities are apt to be attracted to the material creation, actively and subjectively, they are therefore different from the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord of māyā, desiring to become many, by his own will, accepts time which was merged in himself, as well as karma and svabhāva which were merged in the jīva, through the agency of māyā.
Commentary

It has been stated that the Lord produces the universe by means of his energy māyā. Now the process (yatḥa sṛsṭam idam) is given. The Lord, desiring to become many (vibubhūṣuḥ) by his own will (yadṛcchayā), accepts for creation (upāḍade) time, which was merged in him (ātman prāptam kālam), karma (the fate of the jīvas) and svabhāvam which were merged in the jīva. This does not take place spontaneously, but by māyā.

Related verses
Creation is rhythmic — manifested, dissolved, manifested again — like the rainy season. Our incarnations are not the random; they reflect the desires we held at the last dissolution. What we want shapes what we become.
Reflection Questions
  • If my current desires were to shape my next existence, where would they take me?
  • What small desire could I begin to redirect today toward what truly lasts?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.22

↗
कालाद् गुणव्यतिकर: परिणाम: स्वभावत: । कर्मणो जन्म महत: पुरुषाधिष्ठितादभूत् ॥ २२ ॥
kālād guṇa-vyatikaraḥ
[kaalaad guna-vyatikarah]
pariṇāmaḥ svabhāvataḥ
[parinaamah svabhaavatah]
karmaṇo janma mahataḥ
[karmano janma mahatah]
puruṣādhiṣṭhitād abhūt
[purushaadhishthitaad abhoot]
kālāt — from eternal time guṇa-vyatikaraḥ — transformation of the modes by reaction pariṇāmaḥ — transformation svabhāvataḥ — from the nature karmaṇaḥ — of activities janma — creation mahataḥ — of the mahat-tattva puruṣa-adhiṣṭhitāt — because of the puruṣa incarnation of the Lord abhūt — it took place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kālād guṇa-vyatikaraḥ
kālāt
from eternal time
guṇa-vyatikaraḥ
transformation of the modes by reaction
pariṇāmaḥ svabhāvataḥ
pariṇāmaḥ
transformation
svabhāvataḥ
from the nature
karmaṇo janma mahataḥ
karmaṇaḥ
of activities
janma
creation
mahataḥ
of the mahat-tattva
puruṣādhiṣṭhitād abhūt
puruṣa-adhiṣṭhitāt
because of the puruṣa incarnation of the Lord
abhūt
it took place.
After the incarnation of the first puruṣa [Kāraṇārṇavaśāyī Viṣṇu], the mahat-tattva, or the principles of material creation, take place, and then time is manifested, and in course of time the three qualities appear. Nature means the three qualitative appearances. They transform into activities.

By the omnipotency of the Supreme Lord, the whole material creation evolves by the process of transformation and reactions one after another, and by the same omnipotency, they are wound up again one after another and conserved in the body of the Supreme. Kāla, or time, is the synonym of nature and is the transformed manifestation of the principles of material creation. As such, kāla may be taken as the first cause of all creation, and by transformation of nature different activities of the material world become visible. These activities may be taken up as the natural instinct of each and every living being, or even of the inert objects, and after the manifestation of activities there are varieties of products and by-products of the same nature. Originally these are all due to the Supreme Lord. The Vedānta-sūtras and the Bhāgavatam thus begin with the Absolute Truth as the beginning of all creations ( janmādy asya yataḥ ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The guṇas are agitated from a state of equilibrium by time. They are transformed into another form by svabhāva. The mahat-tattva appears by the karma of the jīvas. All this is under the direction of the Lord.
Commentary

The functions of time and other factors are discussed. Time is the agitator of the guṇas. This means giving up equilibrium. Pariṇāmaḥ means attaining another form. Mahataḥ is mahat-tattva. Puruṣādhiṣṭhitād modifies all the three items.

Time itself is a manifestation of the Lord's energy, not a neutral backdrop. Through time, nature's qualities unfold into activities. To respect time is to respect the Lord's quiet operation behind every change.
Reflection Questions
  • How do I treat time — as my possession, or as the Lord's medium of work?
  • What activity have I been treating as merely mine that is actually time doing its work?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.23

↗
महतस्तु विकुर्वाणाद्रज:सत्त्वोपबृंहितात् । तम:प्रधानस्त्वभवद् द्रव्यज्ञानक्रियात्मक: ॥ २३ ॥
mahatas tu vikurvāṇād
[mahatas tu vikurvaanaad]
rajaḥ-sattvopabṛṁhitāt
[rajah-sattvopabrimhitaat]
tamaḥ-pradhānas tv abhavad
[tamah-pradhaanas tv abhavad]
dravya-jñāna-kriyātmakaḥ
[dravya-jnaana-kriyaatmakah]
mahataḥ — of the mahat-tattva tu — but vikurvāṇāt — being transformed rajaḥ — the material mode of passion sattva — the mode of goodness upabṛṁhitāt — because of being increased tamaḥ — the mode of darkness pradhānaḥ — being prominent tu — but abhavat — took place dravya — matter jñāna — material knowledge kriyā-ātmakaḥ — predominantly material activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mahatas tu vikurvāṇād
mahataḥ
of the mahat-tattva
tu
but
vikurvāṇāt
being transformed
rajaḥ-sattvopabṛṁhitāt
rajaḥ
the material mode of passion
sattva
the mode of goodness
upabṛṁhitāt
because of being increased
tamaḥ
the mode of darkness
tamaḥ-pradhānas tv abhavad
pradhānaḥ
being prominent
tu
but
abhavat
took place
dravya-jñāna-kriyātmakaḥ
dravya
matter
jñāna
material knowledge
kriyā-ātmakaḥ
predominantly material activities.
Material activities are caused by the mahat-tattva’s being agitated. At first there is transformation of the modes of goodness and passion, and later — due to the mode of ignorance — matter, its knowledge, and different activities of material knowledge come into play.

Material creations of every description are more or less due to the development of the mode of passion ( rajas ). The mahat-tattva is the principle of material creation, and when it is agitated by the will of the Supreme at first the modes of passion and goodness are prominent, and afterwards the mode of passion, being generated in due course by material activities of different varieties, becomes prominent, and the living entities are thus involved more and more in ignorance. Brahmā is the representation of the mode of passion, and Viṣṇu is the representation of the mode of goodness, while the mode of ignorance is represented by Lord Śiva, the father of material activities. Material nature is called the mother, and the initiator for materialistic life is the father, Lord Śiva. All material creation by the living entities is therefore initiated by the mode of passion. With the advancement of the duration of life in a particular millennium, the different modes act by gradual development. In the , as such Age of Kali (when the mode of passion is most prominent) material activities of different varieties, in the name of advancement of human civilization, take place, and the living entities become more and more involved in forgetting their real identity — the spiritual nature. By a slight cultivation of the mode of goodness, a glimpse of spiritual nature is perceived, but due to the prominence of the mode of passion, the mode of goodness becomes adulterated. Therefore one cannot transcend the limits of the material modes, and therefore realization of the Lord, who is always transcendental to the modes of material nature, becomes very difficult for the living entities, even though prominently situated in the mode of goodness through cultivation of the various methods. In other words, the gross matters are adhibhūtam, their maintenance is adhidaivam, and the initiator of material activities is called adhyātmam. In the material world these three principles act as prominent features, namely as raw material, its regular supplies, and its use in different varieties of material creations for sense enjoyment by the bewildered entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the transformation called mahat-tattva predominated by rajas and sattva, a substance predominated by tamas, ahaṅkāra, arose, composed of adhibhūta, adhyātma and. adhidaiva.
Commentary

Mahat-tattva has all the three guṇas but there is a predominance of rajas and sattva, because of kriyā and jñāna śaktis. From this state of transformation, namely, mahat-tattva which has a predominance of rajas and sattva and which is produced by time, svabhāva and karma, a substance predominated by tamas (ahaṅkāra) arises. The word yaḥ can be added to connect this verse with saḥ in the next verse. Drayva refers to adhibhūtam, jñānam to adhidaivam and kriyā to adhyātman. These are three causes of illusion for the living entities.

Material creation depends mostly on the mode of passion. As civilization 'advances' in Kali, passion intensifies and ignorance follows. Producing endless 'necessities' is itself a symptom — not progress, but increasing entanglement.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my life is passion masquerading as progress?
  • What 'necessity' I am pursuing is actually a deepening of ignorance, not a step toward freedom?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.24

↗
सोऽहङ्कार इति प्रोक्तो विकुर्वन् समभूत्‍त्रिधा । वैकारिकस्तैजसश्च तामसश्चेति यद्भिदा । द्रव्यशक्ति: क्रियाशक्तिर्ज्ञानशक्तिरिति प्रभो ॥ २४ ॥
so ’haṅkāra iti prokto
[so ’hankaara iti prokto]
vikurvan samabhūt tridhā
[vikurvan samabhoot tridhaa]
vaikārikas taijasaś ca
[vaikaarikas taijasash cha]
tāmasaś ceti yad-bhidā
[taamasash cheti yad-bhidaa]
dravya-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
[dravya-shaktih kriyaa-shaktir]
jñāna-śaktir iti prabho
[jnaana-shaktir iti prabho]
saḥ — the very same thing ahaṅkāraḥ — ego iti — thus proktaḥ — said vikurvan — being transformed samabhūt — became manifested tridhā — in three features vaikārikaḥ — in the mode of goodness taijasaḥ — in the mode of passion ca — and tāmasaḥ — in the mode of ignorance ca — also iti — thus yat — what is bhidā — divided dravya-śaktiḥ — powers that evolve matter kriyā-śaktiḥ — initiation that creates jñāna-śaktiḥ — intelligence that guides iti — thus prabho — O master.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’haṅkāra iti prokto
vikurvan samabhūt tridhā
saḥ
the very same thing
ahaṅkāraḥ
ego
vaikārikas taijasaś ca
tāmasaś ceti yad-bhidā
dravya-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
jñāna-śaktir iti prabho
iti
thus
proktaḥ
said
vikurvan
being transformed
samabhūt
became manifested
tridhā
in three features
vaikārikaḥ
in the mode of goodness
taijasaḥ
in the mode of passion
ca
and
tāmasaḥ
in the mode of ignorance
ca
also
iti
thus
yat
what is
bhidā
divided
dravya-śaktiḥ
powers that evolve matter
kriyā-śaktiḥ
initiation that creates
jñāna-śaktiḥ
intelligence that guides
iti
thus
prabho
O master.
The self-centered materialistic ego, thus being transformed into three features, becomes known as the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance in three divisions, namely the powers that evolve matter, knowledge of material creations, and the intelligence that guides such materialistic activities. Nārada, you are quite competent to understand this.

Materialistic ego, or the sense of identification with matter, is grossly self-centered, devoid of clear knowledge of the existence of God. And this self-centered egoism of the materialistic living entities is the cause of their being conditioned by the other paraphernalia and continuing their bondage of material existence. In the Bhagavad-gītā this self-centered egoism is very nicely explained in the Seventh Chapter (verses 24 through 27). The self-centered impersonalist, without a clear conception of the Personality of Godhead, concludes in his own way that the Personality of Godhead takes a material shape from His original impersonal spiritual existence for a particular mission. And this misleading conception of the Supreme Lord by the self-centered impersonalist continues, even though he is seen to be very interested in the Vedic literatures such as the Brahma-sūtras and other highly intellectual sources of knowledge. This ignorance of the personal feature of the Lord is due simply to ignorance of the mixture of different modes. The impersonalist thus cannot conceive of the Lord’s eternal spiritual form of eternal knowledge, bliss and existence. The reason is that the Lord reserves the right of not exposing Himself to the nondevotee who, even after a thorough study of literature like the Bhagavad-gītā, remains an impersonalist simply by obstinacy. This obstinacy is due to the action of yoga-māyā, a personal energy of the Lord that acts like an aide-de-camp by covering the vision of the obstinate impersonalist. Such a bewildered human being is described as mūḍha, or grossly ignorant, because he is unable to understand the transcendental form of the Lord as being unborn and unchangeable. If the Lord takes a form or material shape from His original impersonal feature, then it means that He is born and changeable from impersonal to personal. But He is not changeable. Nor does He ever take a new birth like a conditioned soul. The conditioned soul may take a form birth after birth due to his conditional existence in matter, but the self-centered impersonalists, by their gross ignorance, accept the Lord as one of them because of self-centered egoism, even after so-called advancement of knowledge in the Vedānta. The Lord, being situated in the heart of every individual living entity, knows very well the tendency of such conditioned souls in terms of past, present and future, but the bewildered conditioned soul hardly can know Him in His eternal form. By the will of the Lord, therefore, the impersonalist, even after knowing the Brahman and Paramātmā features of the Lord, remains ignorant of His eternal personal feature as ever-existent Nārāyaṇa, transcendental to all material creation.

The cause of such gross ignorance is constant engagement by the materialistic man in the matter of artificially increasing material demands. To realize the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one has to purify the materialistic senses by devotional service. The mode of goodness, or the brahminical culture recommended in the Vedic literatures, is helpful to such spiritual realization, and thus the jñāna-śakti stage of the conditioned soul is comparatively better than the other two stages, namely dravya-śakti and kriyā-śakti. The whole material civilization is manifested by a huge accumulation of materials, or in other words, raw materials for industrial purposes, and the industrial enterprises ( kriyā-śakti ) are all due to gross ignorance of spiritual life. In order to rectify this great anomaly of materialistic civilization, based on the principles of dravya-śakti and kriyā-śakti, one has to adopt the process of devotional service of the Lord by adoption of the principles of karma-yoga, mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.27) as follows:

yat karoṣi yad aśnāsi yaj juhoṣi dadāsi yat yat tapasyasi kaunteya tat kuruṣva mad-arpaṇam

“O son of Kuntī, all that you do, all that you eat, all that you offer and give away, as well as all austerities that you may perform, should be done as an offering unto Me.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That ahaṅkāra transforms into three types: derived from sattva, rajas and tamas, called jñāna-śakti, kriyā-śakti and dravya-śakti.
Commentary

The three divisions are described: that derived from sattva-guṇa (vaikārikaḥ), from rajoguṇa (taijasaḥ) and from tamoguṇa (tāmasaḥ). The qualities in verse order are drayva, kriyā and jñāna śaktis. The dravya-śakti has the capacity to produce the five gross elements starting with ether. The kriyā-śakti has the capacity to produce the senses. The jñāna-śakti has the capacity to produce the sense devatās. O Nārada (prabho)! You know all of this. The state of equilibrium is pradhāna. By the agitation of time, the predominance of sattva produces the mahat-tattva. Predominance of rajas produces the sūtra-tattva, a type of mahat-tattva. Predominance of tamas produces ahaṅkāra. The effect of ahaṅkāra, with predominance of tamas and with rajas and sattva elements in much less amount, produces the five gross elements. In this covering on the jīva (ahaṅkāra), there is a predominance of tamas.

Self-centered ego — identifying with matter — keeps the conditioned soul bound. Even sharp impersonalists, without grasping the Personality of the Lord, stay in this trap. Sharp intellect alone is not the same as clear vision.
Reflection Questions
  • Is my spiritual study going somewhere real, or is it polishing the ego I am supposed to be transcending?
  • What would soften my self-centered identification with my body and mind today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.25

↗
तामसादपि भूतादेर्विकुर्वाणादभून्नभ: । तस्य मात्रा गुण: शब्दो लिङ्गं यद् द्रष्टृद‍ृश्ययो: ॥ २५ ॥
tāmasād api bhūtāder
[taamasaad api bhootaader]
vikurvāṇād abhūn nabhaḥ
[vikurvaanaad abhoon nabhah]
tasya mātrā guṇaḥ śabdo
[tasya maatraa gunah shabdo]
liṅgaṁ yad draṣṭṛ-dṛśyayoḥ
[lingam yad drashtri-drishyayoh]
tāmasāt — from the darkness of false ego api — certainly bhūta-ādeḥ — of the material elements vikurvāṇāt — because of transformation abhūt — generated nabhaḥ — the sky tasya — its mātrā — subtle form guṇaḥ — quality śabdaḥ — sound liṅgam — characteristics yat — as its draṣṭṛ — the seer dṛśyayoḥ — of what is seen.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāmasād api bhūtāder
tāmasāt
from the darkness of false ego
api
certainly
bhūta-ādeḥ
of the material elements
vikurvāṇād abhūn nabhaḥ
vikurvāṇāt
because of transformation
abhūt
generated
nabhaḥ
the sky
tasya mātrā guṇaḥ śabdo
tasya
its
mātrā
subtle form
guṇaḥ
quality
śabdaḥ
sound
liṅgaṁ yad draṣṭṛ-dṛśyayoḥ
liṅgam
characteristics
yat
as its
draṣṭṛ
the seer
dṛśyayoḥ
of what is seen.
From the darkness of false ego, the first of the five elements, namely the sky, is generated. Its subtle form is the quality of sound, exactly as the seer is in relationship with the seen.

The five elements, namely sky, air, fire, water and earth, are all but different qualities of the darkness of false ego. This means that the false ego in the sum total form of mahat-tattva is generated from the marginal potency of the Lord, and due to this false ego of lording it over the material creation, ingredients are generated for the false enjoyment of the living being. The living being is practically the dominating factor over the material elements as the enjoyer, though the background is the Supreme Lord. Factually, save and except the Lord, no one can be called the enjoyer, but the living entity falsely desires to become the enjoyer. This is the origin of false ego. When the bewildered living being desires this, the shadow elements are generated by the will of the Lord, and the living entities are allowed to run after them as after a phantasmagoria.

It is said that first the tan-mātrā sound is created and then the sky, and in this verse it is confirmed that actually it is so, but sound is the subtle form of the sky, and the distinction is like that between the seer and the seen. The sound is the representation of the actual object, as the sound produced speaking of the object gives an idea of the description of the object. Therefore sound is the subtle characteristic of the object. Similarly, sound representation of the Lord, in terms of His characteristics, is the complete form of the Lord, as was seen by Vasudeva and Mahārāja Daśaratha, the fathers of Lord Kṛṣṇa and Lord Rāma. The sound representation of the Lord is nondifferent from the Lord Himself because the Lord and His representation in sound are absolute knowledge. Lord Caitanya has instructed us that in the holy name of the Lord, as sound representation of the Lord, all the potencies of the Lord are invested. Thus one can immediately enjoy the association of the Lord by the pure vibration of the sound representation of His holy name, and the concept of the Lord is immediately manifested before the pure devotee. A pure devotee, therefore, is not aloof from the Lord even for a moment. The holy name of the Lord, as recommended in the śāstras — Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare — may therefore be constantly chanted by the devotee aspiring to be constantly in touch with the Supreme Lord. One who is thus able to associate with the Lord is sure to be delivered from the darkness of the created world, which is a product of false ego ( tamasi mā jyotir gama ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the darkness of false ego, the first of the five elements, namely, ether (sky), is generated. Its subtle form is the quality of sound. This arose before ether. Sound represents objects unseen (or objects from the past) and seen in the present as well.
Commentary

This describes the details of ahaṅkāra in tamas. Is it not well known that, first, sound arises from this mode? That is true. That is the subtle form (mātrā) of ether. That is its distinguishing quality (guṇa). By sound, ether is produced. This should be understood for the other verses concerning the elements as well. The quality of sound is described. It represents things unseen in the past and things in the present or future. Because it is modifying liṅgam, yad is in the neuter form.

From the darkness of false ego comes sky, whose subtle form is sound. The whole material display is the shadow generated when a tiny being wants to play 'enjoyer'. The cosmos is what our wanting-to-be-the-enjoyer produces.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of what I see around me is the shadow of my wanting to be the enjoyer?
  • What changes if I notice sound itself as the first echo of my ego's wish?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.26-29

↗
नभसोऽथ विकुर्वाणादभूत् स्पर्शगुणोऽनिल: । परान्वयाच्छब्दवांश्च प्राण ओज: सहो बलम् ॥ २६ ॥ वायोरपि विकुर्वाणात् कालकर्मस्वभावत: । उदपद्यत तेजो वै रूपवत् स्पर्शशब्दवत् ॥ २७ ॥ तेजसस्तु विकुर्वाणादासीदम्भो रसात्मकम् । रूपवत् स्पर्शवच्चाम्भो घोषवच्च परान्वयात् ॥ २८ ॥ विशेषस्तु विकुर्वाणादम्भसो गन्धवानभूत् । परान्वयाद् रसस्पर्शशब्दरूपगुणान्वित: ॥ २९ ॥
nabhaso ’tha vikurvāṇād
[nabhaso ’tha vikurvaanaad]
abhūt sparśa-guṇo ’nilaḥ
[abhoot sparsha-guno ’nilah]
parānvayāc chabdavāṁś ca
[paraanvayaach chabdavaamsh cha]
prāṇa ojaḥ saho balam
[praana ojah saho balam]
vāyor api vikurvāṇāt
[vaayor api vikurvaanaat]
kāla-karma-svabhāvataḥ
[kaala-karma-svabhaavatah]
udapadyata tejo vai
[udapadyata tejo vai]
rūpavat sparśa-śabdavat
[roopavat sparsha-shabdavat]
tejasas tu vikurvāṇād
[tejasas tu vikurvaanaad]
āsīd ambho rasātmakam
[aaseed ambho rasaatmakam]
rūpavat sparśavac cāmbho
[roopavat sparshavach chaambho]
ghoṣavac ca parānvayāt
[ghoshavach cha paraanvayaat]
viśeṣas tu vikurvāṇād
[visheshas tu vikurvaanaad]
ambhaso gandhavān abhūt
[ambhaso gandhavaan abhoot]
parānvayād rasa-sparśa-
[paraanvayaad rasa-sparsha-]
śabda-rūpa-guṇānvitaḥ
[shabda-roopa-gunaanvitah]
nabhasaḥ — of the sky atha — thus vikurvāṇāt — being transformed abhūt — generated sparśa — touch guṇaḥ — quality anilaḥ — air para — previous anvayāt — by succession śabdavān — full of sound ca — also prāṇaḥ — life ojaḥ — sense perception sahaḥ — fat balam — strength vāyoḥ — of the air api — also vikurvāṇāt — by transformation kāla — time karma — reaction of the past svabhāvataḥ — on the basis of nature udapadyata — generated tejaḥ — fire vai — duly rūpavat — with form sparśa — touch śabdavat — with sound also tejasaḥ — of the fire tu — but vikurvāṇāt — on being transformed āsīt — it so happened ambhaḥ — water rasa-ātmakam — composed of juice rūpavat — with form sparśavat — with touch ca — and ambhaḥ — water ghoṣavat — with sound ca — and para — previous anvayāt — by succession viśeṣaḥ — variegatedness tu — but vikurvāṇāt — by transformation ambhasaḥ — of water gandhavān — odorous abhūt — became para — previous anvayāt — by succession rasa — juice sparśa — touch śabda — sound rūpa-guṇa-anvitaḥ — qualitative.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nabhaso ’tha vikurvāṇād
nabhasaḥ
of the sky
abhūt sparśa-guṇo ’nilaḥ
parānvayāc chabdavāṁś ca
prāṇa ojaḥ saho balam
vāyor api vikurvāṇāt
atha
thus
kāla-karma-svabhāvataḥ
udapadyata tejo vai
rūpavat sparśa-śabdavat
tejasas tu vikurvāṇād
vikurvāṇāt
being transformed
āsīd ambho rasātmakam
rūpavat sparśavac cāmbho
ghoṣavac ca parānvayāt
viśeṣas tu vikurvāṇād
ambhaso gandhavān abhūt
abhūt
generated
parānvayād rasa-sparśa-
sparśa
touch
śabda-rūpa-guṇānvitaḥ
guṇaḥ
quality
anilaḥ
air
para
previous
anvayāt
by succession
śabdavān
full of sound
ca
also
prāṇaḥ
life
ojaḥ
sense perception
sahaḥ
fat
balam
strength
vāyoḥ
of the air
api
also
vikurvāṇāt
by transformation
kāla
time
karma
reaction of the past
svabhāvataḥ
on the basis of nature
udapadyata
generated
tejaḥ
fire
vai
duly
rūpavat
with form
sparśa
touch
śabdavat
with sound also
tejasaḥ
of the fire
tu
but
vikurvāṇāt
on being transformed
āsīt
it so happened
ambhaḥ
water
rasa-ātmakam
composed of juice
rūpavat
with form
sparśavat
with touch
ca
and
ambhaḥ
water
ghoṣavat
with sound
ca
and
para
previous
anvayāt
by succession
viśeṣaḥ
variegatedness
tu
but
vikurvāṇāt
by transformation
ambhasaḥ
of water
gandhavān
odorous
abhūt
became
para
previous
anvayāt
by succession
rasa
juice
sparśa
touch
śabda
sound
rūpa-guṇa-anvitaḥ
qualitative.
Because the sky is transformed, the air is generated with the quality of touch, and by previous succession the air is also full of sound and the basic principles of duration of life: sense perception, mental power and bodily strength. When the air is transformed in course of time and nature’s course, fire is generated, taking shape with the sense of touch and sound. Since fire is also transformed, there is a manifestation of water, full of juice and taste. As previously, it also has form and touch and is also full of sound. And water, being transformed from all variegatedness on earth, appears odorous and, as previously, becomes qualitatively full of juice, touch, sound and form respectively.

The whole process of creation is an act of gradual evolution and development from one element to another, reaching up to the variegatedness of the earth as so many trees, plants, mountains, rivers, reptiles, birds, animals and varieties of human beings. The quality of sense perception is also evolutionary, namely generated from sound, then touch, and from touch to form. Taste and odor are also generated along with the gradual development of sky, air, fire, water and earth. They are all mutually the cause and effect of one another, but the original cause is the Lord Himself in plenary portion, as Mahā-Viṣṇu lying in the causal water of the mahat-tattva. As such, Lord Kṛṣṇa is described in the Brahma-saṁhitā as the cause of all causes, and this is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (10.8) as follows:

ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate iti matvā bhajante māṁ budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ

The qualities of sense perception are fully represented in the earth, and they are manifested in other elements to a lesser extent. In the sky there is sound only, whereas in the air there are sound and touch. In the fire there are sound, touch and shape, and in the water there is taste also, along with the other perceptions, namely sound, touch and shape. In the earth, however, there are all the above-mentioned qualities with an extra development of odor also. Therefore on the earth there is a full display of variegatedness of life, which is originally started with the basic principle of air. Diseases of the body take place due to derangement of air within the earthly body of the living beings. Mental diseases result from special derangement of the air within the body, and, as such, yogic exercise is especially beneficial to keep the air in order so that diseases of the body become almost nil by such exercises. When they are properly done the duration of life also increases, and one can have control over death also by such practices. A perfect yogī can have command over death and quit the body at the right moment, when he is competent to transfer himself to a suitable planet. The bhakti-yogī, however, surpasses all the yogīs because, by dint of his devotional service, he is promoted to the region beyond the material sky and is placed in one of the planets in the spiritual sky by the supreme will of the Lord, the controller of everything.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From ether arose the subtle touch and the element air. Air also holds the previous quality of sound. Air is the cause of prāṇa, which gives strength to the senses, mind and body.
Commentary

Ether is the cause of air. Air contains the previous quality of sound. The character of air is the prāṇa, which supports the body. Ojas is sharpness of the senses. Sahas is sharpness of the mind, and balam is health of the body. Prāṇa is the cause of these.

Creation evolves step by step — sky to air to fire to water to earth — each element adding a quality, all rooted ultimately in Mahā-Viṣṇu. The variety around us is not random; it is a careful, ordered unfolding from one cause.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I see the sensory world as a chaotic clutter, or as an ordered unfolding from one Source?
  • How does it help me to know that even taste, smell, and touch trace back to the Lord?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.30

↗
वैकारिकान्मनो जज्ञे देवा वैकारिका दश । दिग्वातार्कप्रचेतोऽश्विवह्नीन्द्रोपेन्द्रमित्रका: ॥ ३० ॥
vaikārikān mano jajñe
[vaikaarikaan mano jajne]
devā vaikārikā daśa
[devaa vaikaarikaa dasha]
dig-vātārka-praceto ’śvi-
[dig-vaataarka-pracheto ’shvi-]
vahnīndropendra-mitra-kāḥ
[vahneendropendra-mitra-kaah]
vaikārikāt — from the mode of goodness manaḥ — the mind jajñe — generated devāḥ — demigods vaikārikāḥ — in the mode of goodness daśa — ten dik — the controller of directions vāta — the controller of air arka — the sun pracetaḥ — Varuṇa aśvi — the Aśvinī-kumāras vahni — the fire-god indra — the King of heaven upendra — the deity in heaven mitra — one of the twelve Ādityas kāḥ — Prajāpati Brahmā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vaikārikān mano jajñe
vaikārikāt
from the mode of goodness
manaḥ
the mind
jajñe
generated
devā vaikārikā daśa
devāḥ
demigods
vaikārikāḥ
in the mode of goodness
daśa
ten
dig-vātārka-praceto ’śvi-
dik
the controller of directions
vāta
the controller of air
arka
the sun
pracetaḥ
Varuṇa
aśvi
the Aśvinī-kumāras
vahnīndropendra-mitra-kāḥ
vahni
the fire-god
indra
the King of heaven
upendra
the deity in heaven
mitra
one of the twelve Ādityas
kāḥ
Prajāpati Brahmā.
From the mode of goodness the mind is generated and becomes manifest, as also the ten demigods controlling the bodily movements. Such demigods are known as the controller of directions, the controller of air, the sun-god, the father of Dakṣa Prajāpati, the Aśvinī-kumāras, the fire-god, the King of heaven, the worshipable deity in heaven, the chief of the Ādityas, and Brahmājī, the Prajāpati. All come into existence.

Vaikārika is the neutral stage of creation, and tejas is the initiative of creation, while tamas is the full display of material creation under the spell of the darkness of ignorance. Manufacture of the “necessities of life” in factories and workshops, excessively prominent in the Age of Kali, or in the age of the machine, is the summit stage of the quality of darkness. Such manufacturing enterprises by human society are in the mode of darkness because factually there is no necessity for the commodities manufactured. Human society primarily requires food for subsistence, shelter for sleeping, defense for protection, and commodities for satisfaction of the senses. The senses are the practical signs of life, as will be explained in the next verse. Human civilization is meant for purifying the senses, and objects of sense satisfaction should be supplied as much as absolutely required, but not for aggravating artificial sensory needs. Food, shelter, defense and sense gratification are all needs in material existence. Otherwise, in his pure, uncontaminated state of original life, the living entity has no such needs. The needs are therefore artificial, and in the pure state of life there are no such needs. As such, increasing the artificial needs, as is the standard of material civilization, or advancing the economic development of human society, is a sort of engagement in darkness, without knowledge. By such engagement, human energy is spoiled, because human energy is primarily meant for purifying the senses in order to engage them in satisfying the senses of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord, being the supreme possessor of spiritual senses, is the master of the senses, Hṛṣīkeśa. Hṛṣīka means the senses, and īśa means the master. The Lord is not the servant of the senses, or, in other words, He is not directed by the dictation of the senses, but the conditioned souls or the individual living entities are servants of the senses. They are conducted by the direction or dictation of the senses, and therefore material civilization is a kind of engagement in sense gratification only. The standard of human civilization should be to cure the disease of sense gratification, and one can do this simply by becoming an agent for satisfying the spiritual senses of the Lord. The senses are never to be stopped in their engagements, but one should purify them by engaging them in the pure service of sense gratification of the master of the senses. This is the instruction of the whole Bhagavad-gītā. Arjuna wanted first of all to satisfy his own senses by his decision not to fight with his kinsmen and friends, but Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa taught him the Bhagavad-gītā just to purify Arjuna’s decision for sense gratification. Therefore Arjuna agreed to satisfy the senses of the Lord, and thus he fought the Battle of Kurukṣetra, as the Lord desired.

The Vedas instruct us to get out of the existence of darkness and go forward on the path of light ( tamasi mā jyotir gama ). The path of light is therefore to satisfy the senses of the Lord. Misguided men, or less intelligent men, follow the path of self-realization without any attempt to satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord by following the path shown by Arjuna and other devotees of the Lord. On the contrary, they artificially try to stop the activities of the senses ( yoga system), or they deny the transcendental senses of the Lord ( jñāna system). The devotees, however, are above the yogīs and the jñānīs because pure devotees do not deny the senses of the Lord; they want to satisfy the senses of the Lord. Only because of the darkness of ignorance do the yogīs and jñānīs deny the senses of the Lord and thus artificially try to control the activities of the diseased senses. In the diseased condition of the senses there is too much engagement of the senses in increasing material needs. When one comes to see the disadvantage of aggravating the sense activities, one is called a jñānī, and when one tries to stop the activities of the senses by the practice of yogic principles, he is called a yogī, but when one is fully aware of the transcendental senses of the Lord and tries to satisfy His senses, one is called a devotee of the Lord. The devotees of the Lord do not try to deny the senses of the Lord, nor do they artificially stop the actions of the senses. But they do voluntarily engage the purified senses in the service of the master of the senses, as was done by Arjuna, thereby easily attaining the perfection of satisfying the Lord, the ultimate goal of all perfection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From ahaṅkāra in sattva arose the mind and it deity as well as the ten presiding deities of the senses: the directions, Vāyu, the sun, Varuṇa, the two Aśvini-kumāras, Agni, Indra, Upendra, Mitra and Prajāpati Dakṣa.
Commentary

From ahaṅkāra in sattva arose mind, and its devatā the moon. The other sense devatās are mentioned: directions for ear, Vāyu for the skin, the sun for the eyes, Varuṇa for the tongue and the two Aśvinis for the nose, Agni for the voice, Indra for the hands, Upendra for the feet, Mitra for the anus and Prajāpati for the penis. [Note: Jīva Gosvāmī says that Upendra is not Viṣṇu but a devatā with some powers of the Lord. Vijayadvaja-tīrtha says kaḥ is Dakṣa Prajāpati.]

From goodness arise the mind and the demigods who quietly direct our bodies. Factories and 'necessities of life' beyond actual need are summit-stage darkness, not progress. Use of the senses for purification, not aggravation, is the human aim.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my 'needs' are real, and which are manufactured demands of the mode of darkness?
  • What is one sense I am currently aggravating that I could begin to purify?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.31

↗
तैजसात् तु विकुर्वाणादिन्द्रियाणि दशाभवन् । ज्ञानशक्ति: क्रियाशक्तिर्बुद्धि: प्राणश्च तैजसौ । श्रोत्रं त्वग्घ्राणद‍ृग्जिह्वा वागदोर्मेढ्राङ्‌घ्रिपायव: ॥ ३१ ॥
taijasāt tu vikurvāṇād
[taijasaat tu vikurvaanaad]
indriyāṇi daśābhavan
[indriyaani dashaabhavan]
jñāna-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
[jnaana-shaktih kriyaa-shaktir]
buddhiḥ prāṇaś ca taijasau
[buddhih praanash cha taijasau]
śrotraṁ tvag-ghrāṇa-dṛg-jihvā
[shrotram tvag-ghraana-drig-jihvaa]
vāg-dor-meḍhrāṅghri-pāyavaḥ
[vaag-dor-medhraanghri-paayavah]
taijasāt — by the passionate egoism tu — but vikurvāṇāt — transformation of indriyāṇi — the senses daśa — ten abhavan — generated jñāna-śaktiḥ — the five senses for acquiring knowledge kriyā-śaktiḥ — the five senses of activities buddhiḥ — intelligence prāṇaḥ — the living energy ca — also taijasau — all products of the mode of passion śrotram — the sense for hearing tvak — the sense for touching ghrāṇa — the sense for smelling dṛk — the sense for seeing jihvāḥ — the sense for tasting vāk — the sense for speaking doḥ — the sense for handling meḍhra — the genitals aṅghri — the legs pāyavaḥ — the sense for evacuating.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taijasāt tu vikurvāṇād
taijasāt
by the passionate egoism
tu
but
vikurvāṇāt
transformation of
indriyāṇi daśābhavan
indriyāṇi
the senses
daśa
ten
abhavan
generated
jñāna-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
jñāna-śaktiḥ
the five senses for acquiring knowledge
kriyā-śaktiḥ
the five senses of activities
buddhiḥ prāṇaś ca taijasau
buddhiḥ
intelligence
prāṇaḥ
the living energy
ca
also
taijasau
all products of the mode of passion
śrotraṁ tvag-ghrāṇa-dṛg-jihvā
śrotram
the sense for hearing
tvak
the sense for touching
ghrāṇa
the sense for smelling
dṛk
the sense for seeing
jihvāḥ
the sense for tasting
vāg-dor-meḍhrāṅghri-pāyavaḥ
vāk
the sense for speaking
doḥ
the sense for handling
meḍhra
the genitals
aṅghri
the legs
pāyavaḥ
the sense for evacuating.
By further transformation of the mode of passion, the sense organs like the ear, skin, nose, eyes, tongue, mouth, hands, genitals, legs, and the outlet for evacuating, together with intelligence and living energy, are all generated.

The living condition in material existence depends more or less on one’s intelligence and powerful living energy. Intelligence to counteract the hard struggle for existence is assisted by the senses for acquiring knowledge, and the living energy maintains himself by manipulating the active organs, like the hands and legs. But on the whole, the struggle for existence is an exertion of the mode of passion. Therefore all the sense organs, headed by intelligence and the living energy, prāṇa, are different products and by-products of the second mode of nature, called passion. This mode of passion, however, is the product of the air element, as described before.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From ahaṅkāra in rajas arose the intelligence (the śakti of the five knowledge senses), prāṇa (the śakti of the five action senses), and the ten senses. The ten senses are the ear, skin, nose, eye, tongue, voice, hands, feet, anus and penis.
Commentary

From the transformation of ahaṅkāra in rajas arose the ten senses. The śakti of the five knowledge senses is intelligence (buddhiḥ). [Note: Jñāna-śakti comes from sattva. Kriyā-śakti comes from rajas. ] The śakti of the five action senses is prāṇa. Buddhi and prāṇa arise from ahaṅkāra in rajas, and buddhi becomes particularized as the five knowledge senses. Prāṇa becomes particularized as the five action senses. It should be understood that air in the form of prāṇa arising from the ahaṅkāra in tamas is also an effect of ahaṅkāra in rajas. Doḥ means hands. Meḍhra is the penis. Pāyuḥ is the anus. They are not in proper order.

The senses, intelligence, and life-energy by which we hustle through life are products of the mode of passion. Even our striving and surviving are passion at work. Recognize the mode you are operating in before judging the outcomes.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of today's energy is passion's struggle, and how much is goodness's clarity?
  • What would shift if I stopped identifying my drive with my self?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.32

↗
यदैतेऽसङ्गता भावा भूतेन्द्रियमनोगुणा: । यदायतननिर्माणे न शेकुर्ब्रह्मवित्तम ॥ ३२ ॥
yadaite ’saṅgatā bhāvā
[yadaite ’sangataa bhaavaa]
bhūtendriya-mano-guṇāḥ
[bhootendriya-mano-gunaah]
yadāyatana-nirmāṇe
[yadaayatana-nirmaane]
na śekur brahma-vittama
[na shekur brahma-vittama]
yadā — as long as ete — all these asaṅgatāḥ — without being assembled bhāvāḥ — remained so situated bhūta — elements indriya — senses manaḥ — mind guṇāḥ — modes of nature yadā — so long āyatana — the body nirmāṇe — in being formed na śekuḥ — was not possible brahma-vit-tama — O Nārada, the best knower of transcendental knowledge.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadaite ’saṅgatā bhāvā
yadā
as long as
ete
all these
bhūtendriya-mano-guṇāḥ
yadāyatana-nirmāṇe
na śekur brahma-vittama
asaṅgatāḥ
without being assembled
bhāvāḥ
remained so situated
bhūta
elements
indriya
senses
manaḥ
mind
guṇāḥ
modes of nature
yadā
so long
āyatana
the body
nirmāṇe
in being formed
na śekuḥ
was not possible
brahma-vit-tama
O Nārada, the best knower of transcendental knowledge.
O Nārada, best of the transcendentalists, the forms of the body cannot take place as long as these created parts, namely the elements, senses, mind and modes of nature, are not assembled.

The different types of bodily construction of the living entities are exactly like different types of motorcars manufactured by assembling the allied motor parts. When the car is ready, the driver sits in the car and moves it as he desires. This is also confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (18.61) : the living entity is as if seated on the machine of the body, and the car of the body is moving by the control of material nature, just as the railway trains are moving under the direction of the controller. The living entities, however, are not the bodies; they are separate from the cars of the body. But the less intelligent material scientist cannot understand the process of assembling the parts of the body, namely the senses, the mind and the qualities of the material modes. Every living entity is a spiritual spark, part and parcel of the Supreme Being, and by the kindness of the Lord, for the Father is kind to His sons, the individual living beings are given a little freedom to act according to their will to lord it over the material nature. Just as a father gives some playthings to the crying child to satisfy him, the whole material creation is made possible by the will of the Lord to allow the bewildered living entities to lord it over things as they desire, although under the control of the agent of the Lord. The living entities are exactly like small children playing the material field under the control of the maidservant of the Lord (nature). They accept the māyā, or the maidservant, as all in all and thus wrongly conceive the Supreme Truth to be feminine (goddess Durgā, etc.). The foolish, childlike materialists cannot reach beyond the conception of the maidservant, material nature, but the intelligent grown-up sons of the Lord know well that all the acts of material nature are controlled by the Lord, just as a maidservant is under the control of the master, the father of the undeveloped children.

The parts of the body, such as the senses, are the creation of the mahat-tattva, and when they are assembled by the will of the Lord, the material body comes into existence, and the living entity is allowed to use it for further activities. This is explained as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of the brāhmaṇas! As long as the gross elements, senses and mind were not mixed together, it was not possible for them to produce material bodies. Coming together by the impulse of the Lord’s energy, accepting primary and secondary forms, they created the body of the whole universe and the individual bodies in it.
Commentary

The kāraṇa-sṛṣṭi has been described. Now the kārya-sṛṣṭi is described. When these ingredients were unmixed (asaṅgatā), and when it was not possible for them to make the bodies (āyatana), then the Lord entered them. They became combined by his compacting energy, and taking primary and secondary forms, created the body of the universe as a whole and the individual bodies.

A body is an assembly — elements, senses, mind, and modes brought together by higher will. We are seated in this 'car' but are not it. Knowing you are not the vehicle is the start of using it well.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my day do I forget I am the rider and act as if I am the car?
  • What would I do differently if I lived as a soul driving a temporary vehicle?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.33

↗
तदा संहृत्य चान्योन्यं भगवच्छक्तिचोदिता: । सदसत्त्वमुपादाय चोभयं ससृजुर्ह्यद: ॥ ३३ ॥
tadā saṁhatya cānyonyaṁ
[tadaa samhatya chaanyonyam]
bhagavac-chakti-coditāḥ
[bhagavach-chakti-choditaah]
sad-asattvam upādāya
[sad-asattvam upaadaaya]
cobhayaṁ sasṛjur hy adaḥ
[chobhayam sasrijur hy adah]
tadā — all those saṁhatya — being assembled ca — also anyonyam — one another bhagavat — by the Personality of Godhead śakti — energy coditāḥ — being applied sat-asattvam — primarily and secondarily upādāya — accepting ca — also ubhayam — both sasṛjuḥ — came into existence hi — certainly adaḥ — this universe.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadā saṁhatya cānyonyaṁ
tadā
all those
saṁhatya
being assembled
ca
also
anyonyam
one another
bhagavac-chakti-coditāḥ
bhagavat
by the Personality of Godhead
sad-asattvam upādāya
śakti
energy
cobhayaṁ sasṛjur hy adaḥ
coditāḥ
being applied
sat-asattvam
primarily and secondarily
upādāya
accepting
ca
also
ubhayam
both
sasṛjuḥ
came into existence
hi
certainly
adaḥ
this universe.
Thus when all these became assembled by force of the energy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, this universe certainly came into being by accepting both the primary and secondary causes of creation.

In this verse it is clearly mentioned that the Supreme Personality of Godhead exerts His different energies in the creation; it is not that He Himself is transformed into material creations. He expands Himself by His different energies, as well as by His plenary portions. In a corner of the spiritual sky of brahmajyoti a spiritual cloud sometimes appears, and the covered portion is called the mahat-tattva. The Lord then, by His plenary portion as Mahā-Viṣṇu, lies down within the water of the mahat-tattva, and the water is called the Causal Ocean (Kāraṇa-jala). While Mahā-Viṣṇu sleeps within the Causal Ocean, innumerable universes are generated along with His breathing. These universes are floating, and they are scattered all over the Causal Ocean. They stay only during the breathing period of Mahā-Viṣṇu. In each and every universal globe, the same Mahā-Viṣṇu enters again as Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu and lies there on the serpentlike Śeṣa incarnation. From His navel sprouts a lotus stem, and on the lotus, Brahmā, the lord of the universe, is born. Brahmā creates all forms of living beings of different shapes in terms of different desires within the universe. He also creates the sun, moon and other demigods.

Therefore the chief engineer of the material creation is the Lord Himself, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.10) . It is He only who directs the material nature to produce all sorts of moving and nonmoving creations.

There are two modes of material creation: the creation of the collective universes, as stated above, done by the Mahā-Viṣṇu, and the creation of the single universe. Both are done by the Lord, and thus the universal shape, as we can see, takes place.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of the brāhmaṇas! As long as the gross elements, senses and mind were not mixed together, it was not possible for them to produce material bodies. Coming together by the impulse of the Lord’s energy, accepting primary and secondary forms, they created the body of the whole universe and the individual bodies in it.
Commentary

The kāraṇa-sṛṣṭi has been described. Now the kārya-sṛṣṭi is described. When these ingredients were unmixed (asaṅgatā), and when it was not possible for them to make the bodies (āyatana), then the Lord entered them. They became combined by his compacting energy, and taking primary and secondary forms, created the body of the universe as a whole and the individual bodies.

The universe arises through the Lord's energies, not through Him directly transforming into matter. He remains who He is while energies do the work. We can act through our own energies similarly — engaged, but not consumed.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I trying to be my work, or to act through my energies while remaining myself?
  • How does it free me to know the Lord engages without being consumed?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.34

↗
वर्षपूगसहस्रान्ते तदण्डमुदकेशयम् । कालकर्मस्वभावस्थो जीवोऽजीवमजीवयत् ॥ ३४ ॥
varṣa-pūga-sahasrānte
[varsha-pooga-sahasraante]
tad aṇḍam udake śayam
[tad andam udake shayam]
kāla-karma-svabhāva-stho
[kaala-karma-svabhaava-stho]
jīvo ’jīvam ajīvayat
[jeevo ’jeevam ajeevayat]
varṣa-pūga — many years sahasra-ante — of thousands of years tat — that aṇḍam — the universal globe udake — in the causal water śayam — being drowned kāla — eternal time karma — action svabhāva-sthaḥ — according to the modes of nature jīvaḥ — the Lord of the living beings ajīvam — nonanimated ajīvayat — caused to be animated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
varṣa-pūga-sahasrānte
varṣa-pūga
many years
sahasra-ante
of thousands of years
tad aṇḍam udake śayam
tat
that
aṇḍam
the universal globe
udake
in the causal water
śayam
being drowned
kāla-karma-svabhāva-stho
kāla
eternal time
karma
action
svabhāva-sthaḥ
according to the modes of nature
jīvo ’jīvam ajīvayat
jīvaḥ
the Lord of the living beings
ajīvam
nonanimated
ajīvayat
caused to be animated.
Thus all the universes remained thousands of aeons within the water [the Causal Ocean], and the Lord of living beings, entering in each of them, caused them to be fully animated.

The Lord is described here as the jīva because He is the leader of all other jīvas (living entities). In the Vedas He is described as the nitya, the leader of all other nityas. The Lord’s relation with the living entities is like that of the father with the sons. The sons and the father are qualitatively equal, but the father is never the son, nor is the son ever the father who begets. So, as described above, the Lord as Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu or Hiraṇyagarbha Supersoul enters into each and every universe and causes it to be animated by begetting the living entities within the womb of the material nature, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (14.3) . After each annihilation of the material creation, all the living entities are merged within the body of the Lord, and after creation they are again impregnated within the material energy. In material existence, therefore, the material energy is seemingly the mother of the living entities, and the Lord is the father. When, however, the animation takes place, the living entities revive their own natural activities under the spell of time and energy, and thus the varieties of living beings are manifested. The Lord, therefore, is ultimately the cause of all animation in the material world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After a thousand years, the Lord, situated in time, karma and svabhāva, brought to life the non-living universe which was lying in the water.
Commentary

After a thousand years, the purusaḥ (jīvaḥ), the soul of the mass of jīvas (Hiraṇyagarbha), one who gives life, brought to life (ajīvayat) the non-living universe (ajīvam). This shows the connection of the universe with the Lord.

The Lord enters every universe to animate it — like a father with His sons. Material nature seems to be our mother, but the Lord is the actual Father giving life. We are never orphans in this cosmos.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I live as if I were orphaned in the universe, or as a child of a present Father?
  • What would change if I treated material nature as a setting, and the Lord as parent?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.35

↗
स एव पुरुषस्तस्मादण्डं निर्भिद्य निर्गत: । सहस्रोर्वङ्‌घ्रिबाह्वक्ष: सहस्राननशीर्षवान् ॥ ३५ ॥
sa eva puruṣas tasmād
[sa eva purushas tasmaad]
aṇḍaṁ nirbhidya nirgataḥ
[andam nirbhidya nirgatah]
sahasrorv-aṅghri-bāhv-akṣaḥ
[sahasrorv-anghri-baahv-akshah]
sahasrānana-śīrṣavān
[sahasraanana-sheershavaan]
saḥ — He (the Lord) eva — Himself puruṣaḥ — the Supreme Personality of Godhead tasmāt — from within the universe aṇḍam — Hiraṇyagarbha nirbhidya — dividing nirgataḥ — came out sahasra — thousands ūru — thighs aṅghri — legs bāhu — arms akṣaḥ — eyes sahasra — thousands of ānana — mouths śīrṣavān — with heads also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eva puruṣas tasmād
saḥ
He (the Lord)
eva
Himself
puruṣaḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
tasmāt
from within the universe
aṇḍaṁ nirbhidya nirgataḥ
aṇḍam
Hiraṇyagarbha
nirbhidya
dividing
nirgataḥ
came out
sahasrorv-aṅghri-bāhv-akṣaḥ
sahasra
thousands
ūru
thighs
aṅghri
legs
bāhu
arms
akṣaḥ
eyes
sahasrānana-śīrṣavān
sahasra
thousands of
ānana
mouths
śīrṣavān
with heads also.
The Lord [Mahā-Viṣṇu], although lying in the Causal Ocean, came out of it, and dividing Himself as Hiraṇyagarbha, He entered into each universe and assumed the virāṭ-rūpa, with thousands of legs, arms, mouths, heads, etc.

The expansions of the planetary systems within each and every universe are situated in the different parts of the virāṭ-rūpa (universal form) of the Lord, and they are described as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That puruṣa pierced the universe and went outside. There he resides with a thousand legs, feet, arms, eyes, faces and heads.
Commentary

Everything is pervaded by the Lord. This puruṣa is the antaryāmī of the totality of jīvas (hiraṇyagarbha). Tasmād represents a missing verb participle “having entered the universe.” He, entering into the total jīvas, and being situated there (tasmād), pierced the universe, and became situated outside. How is he situated outside? His form without material guṇas lying on the Kāraṇa Ocean is described.

The same Lord enters every universe and assumes the cosmic form with countless heads, hands, and limbs. The vast variety of the cosmos is one Body. Wonder at the universe and devotion to the Person can be the same act.
Reflection Questions
  • When was the last time I let the sheer vastness of the cosmos move me toward devotion?
  • How does my view of 'nature' change when I see it as one Body?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.36

↗
यस्येहावयवैर्लोकान् कल्पयन्ति मनीषिण: । कट्यादिभिरध: सप्त सप्तोर्ध्वं जघनादिभि: ॥ ३६ ॥
yasyehāvayavair lokān
[yasyehaavayavair lokaan]
kalpayanti manīṣiṇaḥ
[kalpayanti maneeshinah]
kaṭya-ādibhir adhaḥ sapta
[katya-aadibhir adhah sapta]
saptordhvaṁ jaghanādibhiḥ
[saptordhvam jaghanaadibhih]
yasya — whose iha — in the universe avayavaiḥ — by the limbs of the body lokān — all the planets kalpayanti — imagine manīṣiṇaḥ — great philosophers kaṭi-ādibhiḥ — down from the waist adhaḥ — downwards sapta — seven systems sapta ūrdhvam — and seven systems upwards jaghana-ādibhiḥ — front portion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yasyehāvayavair lokān
yasya
whose
kalpayanti manīṣiṇaḥ
kaṭya-ādibhir adhaḥ sapta
saptordhvaṁ jaghanādibhiḥ
iha
in the universe
avayavaiḥ
by the limbs of the body
lokān
all the planets
kalpayanti
imagine
manīṣiṇaḥ
great philosophers
kaṭi-ādibhiḥ
down from the waist
adhaḥ
downwards
sapta
seven systems
sapta ūrdhvam
and seven systems upwards
jaghana-ādibhiḥ
front portion.
Great philosophers imagine that the complete planetary systems in the universe are displays of the different upper and lower limbs of the universal body of the Lord.

The word kalpayanti, or “imagine,” is significant. The virāṭ universal form of the Absolute is an imagination of the speculative philosophers who are unable to adjust to the eternal two-handed form of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Although the universal form, as imagined by the great philosophers, is one of the features of the Lord, it is more or less imaginary. It is said that the seven upper planetary systems are situated above the waist of the universal form, whereas the lower planetary systems are situated below His waist. The idea impressed herein is that the Supreme Lord is conscious of every part of His body, and nowhere in the creation is there anything beyond His control.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Within the universe, the wise imagine the planets as his limbs. The buttocks and below are the lower seven planets starting with Atala, and hips and above are the seven upper planets starting with earth.
Commentary

Within the universe (iha) is the puruṣa made of the planets (loka-maya-puruṣaḥ) whose limbs the wise imagine to be the planets. This sentence continues until verse 41. Kaṭi means buttocks. Jaghanam means the hips. The lower seven planets start with Atala. Upwards are Bhū and the other planets.

Philosophers picture the planetary systems as parts of the Lord's cosmic body. It is partly imagined, but the point is real: nothing in creation is beyond His awareness or outside His control.
Reflection Questions
  • Is there a corner of my life I treat as outside His awareness?
  • How would my choices change if every action happened inside His body?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.37

↗
पुरुषस्य मुखं ब्रह्म क्षत्रमेतस्य बाहव: । ऊर्वोर्वैश्यो भगवत: पद्‍भ्यां शूद्रो व्यजायत ॥ ३७ ॥
puruṣasya mukhaṁ brahma
[purushasya mukham brahma]
kṣatram etasya bāhavaḥ
[kshatram etasya baahavah]
ūrvor vaiśyo bhagavataḥ
[oorvor vaishyo bhagavatah]
padbhyāṁ śūdro vyajāyata
[padbhyaam shoodro vyajaayata]
puruṣasya — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead mukham — mouth brahma — is the brāhmaṇas kṣatram — the royal order etasya — of Him bāhavaḥ — the arms ūrvoḥ — the thighs vaiśyaḥ — are the mercantile men bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead padbhyām — from His legs śūdraḥ — the laborer class vyajāyata — became manifested.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
puruṣasya mukhaṁ brahma
puruṣasya
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
mukham
mouth
brahma
is the brāhmaṇas
kṣatram etasya bāhavaḥ
kṣatram
the royal order
etasya
of Him
bāhavaḥ
the arms
ūrvor vaiśyo bhagavataḥ
ūrvoḥ
the thighs
vaiśyaḥ
are the mercantile men
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
padbhyāṁ śūdro vyajāyata
padbhyām
from His legs
śūdraḥ
the laborer class
vyajāyata
became manifested.
The brāhmaṇas represent His mouth, the kṣatriyas His arms, the vaiśyas His thighs, and the śūdras are born of His legs.

All living beings are stated to be the parts and parcels of the Supreme Lord, and how they are so is explained in this verse. The four divisions of human society, namely the intelligent class (the brāhmaṇas ), the administrative class (the kṣatriyas ), the mercantile class (the vaiśyas ), and the laborer class (the śūdras ), are all in different parts of the body of the Lord. As such, no one is different from the Lord. The mouth of the body and the legs of the body are nondifferent constitutionally, but the mouth or the head of the body is qualitatively more important than the legs. At the same time, the mouth, the legs, the arms and the thighs are all component parts of the body. These limbs of the body of the Lord are meant to serve the complete whole. The mouth is meant for speaking and eating, the arms are meant for the protection of the body, the legs are meant for carrying the body, and the waist of the body is meant for maintaining the body. The intelligent class in society, therefore, must speak on behalf of the body, as well as accept foodstuff to satisfy the hunger of the body. The hunger of the Lord is to accept the fruits of sacrifice. The brāhmaṇas, or the intelligent class, must be very expert in performing such sacrifices, and the subordinate classes must join in such sacrifices. To speak for the Supreme Lord means to glorify the Lord by means of propagating the knowledge of the Lord as it is, broadcasting the factual nature of the Lord and the factual position of all other parts of the whole body. The brāhmaṇas, therefore, are required to know the Vedas, or the ultimate source of knowledge. Veda means knowledge, and anta means the end of it. According to Bhagavad-gītā, the Lord is the source of everything ( ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ), and thus the end of all knowledge ( Vedānta ) is to know the Lord, to know our relationship with Him and to act according to that relationship only. The parts of the body are related to the body; similarly, the living being must know his relationship with the Lord. The human life is especially meant for this purpose, namely to know the factual relationship of every living being with the Supreme Lord. Without knowing this relationship, the human life is spoiled. The intelligent class of men, the brāhmaṇas, are therefore especially responsible for broadcasting this knowledge of our relationship with the Lord and leading the general mass of people to the right path. The administrative class is meant for protecting the living beings so that they can serve this purpose. The mercantile class is meant for producing food grains and distributing them to the complete human society so that the whole population is given a chance to live comfortably and discharge the duties of human life. The mercantile class is also required to give protection to the cows in order to get sufficient milk and milk products, which alone can give the proper health and intelligence to maintain a civilization perfectly meant for knowledge of the ultimate truth. And the laborer class, who are neither intelligent nor powerful, can help by physical services to the other higher classes and thus be benefited by their cooperation. Therefore the universe is a complete unit in relationship with the Lord, and without this relationship with the Lord the whole human society is disturbed and is without any peace and prosperity. This is confirmed in the Vedas: brāhmaṇo ’sya mukham āsīd, bāhū rājanyaḥ kṛtaḥ.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The brāhmaṇas arose from the puruṣa’s head, the kṣatriyas arose from his arms, the vaiśyas arose from his thighs and the śūdras arose from his feet.
Commentary

Incidentally, the varṇas also arose from his limbs. Literally the brāhmaṇas are his face. The cause, the face and the effect, the brāhmaṇas, are taken as non-different. Kṣatram means kṣatriyas. The śruti says brāhmaṇo ’sya mukham āsīd bāhū rājanyaḥ kṛtaḥ: the brāhmaṇas were his face, and the kṣatriyas acted as his arms.

Society's four classes — intellectual, administrative, mercantile, laboring — are parts of the Lord's body, each meant to serve the whole. Hierarchy here is not domination; mouth and feet are equally needed. Function differs; dignity is shared.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I respect the part of society I depend on but rarely thank?
  • Which 'limb' of social life is my work, and am I serving the whole or just myself?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.38

↗
भूर्लोक: कल्पित: पद्‍भ्यां भुवर्लोकोऽस्य नाभित: । हृदा स्वर्लोक उरसा महर्लोको महात्मन: ॥ ३८ ॥
bhūrlokaḥ kalpitaḥ padbhyāṁ
[bhoorlokah kalpitah padbhyaam]
bhuvarloko ’sya nābhitaḥ
[bhuvarloko ’sya naabhitah]
hṛdā svarloka urasā
[hridaa svarloka urasaa]
maharloko mahātmanaḥ
[maharloko mahaatmanah]
bhūḥ — the lower planetary systems up to the stratum of the earth lokaḥ — the planets kalpitaḥ — it is so imagined or said padbhyām — out of the legs bhuvaḥ — the upper lokaḥ — the planetary system asya — of Him (the Lord) nābhitaḥ — from the navel abdomen hṛdā — by the heart svarlokaḥ — the planetary systems occupied by the demigods urasā — by the chest maharlokaḥ — the planetary system occupied by great sages and saints mahā-ātmanaḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūrlokaḥ kalpitaḥ padbhyāṁ
bhūḥ
the lower planetary systems up to the stratum of the earth
lokaḥ
the planets
kalpitaḥ
it is so imagined or said
padbhyām
out of the legs
bhuvarloko ’sya nābhitaḥ
bhuvaḥ
the upper
lokaḥ
the planetary system
hṛdā svarloka urasā
asya
of Him (the Lord)
maharloko mahātmanaḥ
nābhitaḥ
from the navel abdomen
hṛdā
by the heart
svarlokaḥ
the planetary systems occupied by the demigods
urasā
by the chest
maharlokaḥ
the planetary system occupied by great sages and saints
mahā-ātmanaḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
The lower planetary systems, up to the limit of the earthly stratum, are said to be situated in His legs. The middle planetary systems, beginning from Bhuvarloka, are situated in His navel. And the still higher planetary systems, occupied by the demigods and highly cultured sages and saints, are situated in the chest of the Supreme Lord.

There are fourteen spheres of planetary systems within this universe. The lower systems are called Bhūrloka, the middle systems are called Bhuvarloka, and the higher planetary systems, up to Brahmaloka, the highest planetary system of the universe, are called Svarloka. And all of them are situated on the body of the Lord. In other words, no one within this universe is without a relationship with the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the feet to the hips the planets from Pātala to earth are imagined. Bhuvarloka extends from the navel. Svarga is situated at the heart, and Maharloka is at the chest.
Commentary

Showing the differences in imagining the planets for purposes of worship, two verses describe the body composed of seven planets. The planets from Pātala to earth are imagined to extend from the two feet to the two hips.

Lower worlds rest on the legs, middle worlds at the navel, higher worlds on the chest — everything is on Him. Nowhere in this universe is anyone outside relationship with the Lord. Geography is theology.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I think of my location and circumstances as outside the Lord, or held within Him?
  • What does it mean for me today that I cannot step outside of Him?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.39

↗
ग्रीवायां जनलोकोऽस्य तपोलोक: स्तनद्वयात् । मूर्धभि: सत्यलोकस्तु ब्रह्मलोक: सनातन: ॥ ३९ ॥
grīvāyāṁ janaloko ’sya
[greevaayaam janaloko ’sya]
tapolokaḥ stana-dvayāt
[tapolokah stana-dvayaat]
mūrdhabhiḥ satyalokas tu
[moordhabhih satyalokas tu]
brahmalokaḥ sanātanaḥ
[brahmalokah sanaatanah]
grīvāyām — up to the neck janalokaḥ — the Janaloka planetary system asya — of Him tapolokaḥ — the Tapoloka planetary system stana-dvayāt — beginning from the breast mūrdhabhiḥ — by the head satyalokaḥ — the Satyaloka planetary system tu — but brahmalokaḥ — the spiritual planets sanātanaḥ — eternal.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
grīvāyāṁ janaloko ’sya
grīvāyām
up to the neck
janalokaḥ
the Janaloka planetary system
tapolokaḥ stana-dvayāt
mūrdhabhiḥ satyalokas tu
asya
of Him
brahmalokaḥ sanātanaḥ
tapolokaḥ
the Tapoloka planetary system
stana-dvayāt
beginning from the breast
mūrdhabhiḥ
by the head
satyalokaḥ
the Satyaloka planetary system
tu
but
brahmalokaḥ
the spiritual planets
sanātanaḥ
eternal.
From the forefront of the chest up to the neck of the universal form of the Lord are situated the planetary systems named Janaloka and Tapoloka, whereas Satyaloka, the topmost planetary system, is situated on the head of the form. The spiritual planets, however, are eternal.

Many times in these pages we have discussed the spiritual planets situated beyond the material sky, and the description is corroborated in this verse. The word sanātana is significant. This very idea of eternity is expressed in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.20) , where it is said that beyond the material creation is the spiritual sky, where everything is eternal. Sometimes Satyaloka, the planet in which Brahmā resides, is also called Brahmaloka. But the Brahmaloka mentioned here is not the same as the Satyaloka planetary system. This Brahmaloka is eternal, whereas the Satyaloka planetary system is not eternal. And to distinguish between the two, the adjective sanātana has been used in this case. According to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, this Brahmaloka is the loka or abode of Brahman, or the Supreme Lord. In the spiritual sky all the planets are as good as the Lord Himself. The Lord is all spirit, and His name, fame, glories, qualities, pastimes, etc., are all nondifferent from Him because He is absolute. As such, the planets in the kingdom of God are also nondifferent from Him. In those planets there is no difference between the body and the soul, nor is there any influence of time as we experience it in the material world. And in addition to there being no influence of time, the planets in Brahmaloka, due to being spiritual, are never annihilated. All variegatedness in the spiritual planets is also one with the Lord, and therefore the Vedic aphorism ekam evādvitīyam is fully realized in that sanātana atmosphere of spiritual variegatedness. This material world is only a shadow phantasmagoria of the spiritual kingdom of the Lord, and because it is a shadow it is never eternal; the variegatedness in the material world of duality (spirit and matter) cannot be compared to that of the spiritual world. Because of a poor fund of knowledge, less intelligent persons sometimes mistake the conditions of the shadow world to be equivalent to those of the spiritual world, and thus they mistake the Lord and His pastimes in the material world to be one with the conditioned souls and their activities. The Lord condemns such less intelligent persons in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) :

avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam paraṁ bhāvam ajānanto mama bhūta-maheśvaram

Whenever the Lord incarnates, He does so in His full internal potency ( ātma-māyā ), and less intelligent persons mistake Him to be one of the material creations. Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī, therefore, rightly commenting on this verse, says that the Brahmaloka mentioned here is Vaikuṇṭha, the kingdom of God, which is sanātana, or eternal, and is therefore not exactly like the material creations described above. The virāṭ universal form of the Lord is an imagination for the material world. It has nothing to do with the spiritual world, or the kingdom of God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Janaloka is on the neck, Tapaloka is on the breast and Satyaloka is on the heads of that form. Above this is the Lord’s planet which is eternal.
Commentary

For the purpose of worship it is not a fault to reverse the limbs (breast after neck). However, stana (nipple) can also mean the lips. Above Satyaloka is the planet of the Lord, Vaikuṇṭha. But this is not the object of meditation as a limb of the universal form because it is eternal. Though it exists within the universe it is like the Lord, eternal.

The topmost universal planets are at His head, but the truly eternal spiritual planets exist beyond all this. The destination is not the highest material rung; it is the deathless realm where time and matter do not press.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I aiming for the highest material 'good', or for what is actually eternal?
  • What current ambition would I revise if I held the eternal as my real horizon?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.40-41

↗
तत्कट्यां चातलं क्लृप्तमूरुभ्यां वितलं विभो: । जानुभ्यां सुतलं शुद्धं जङ्घाभ्यां तु तलातलम् ॥ ४० ॥ महातलं तु गुल्फाभ्यां प्रपदाभ्यां रसातलम् । पातालं पादतलत इति लोकमय: पुमान् ॥ ४१ ॥
tat-kaṭyāṁ cātalaṁ kḷptam
[tat-katyaam chaatalam klriptam]
ūrubhyāṁ vitalaṁ vibhoḥ
[oorubhyaam vitalam vibhoh]
jānubhyāṁ sutalaṁ śuddhaṁ
[jaanubhyaam sutalam shuddham]
jaṅghābhyāṁ tu talātalam
[janghaabhyaam tu talaatalam]
mahātalaṁ tu gulphābhyāṁ
[mahaatalam tu gulphaabhyaam]
prapadābhyāṁ rasātalam
[prapadaabhyaam rasaatalam]
pātālaṁ pāda-talata
[paataalam paada-talata]
iti lokamayaḥ pumān
[iti lokamayah pumaan]
tat — in His kaṭyām — waist ca — also atalam — the first planetary system below the earth kḷptam — situated ūrubhyām — on the thighs vitalam — the second planetary system below vibhoḥ — of the Lord jānubhyām — on the ankles sutalam — the third planetary system below śuddham — purified jaṅghābhyām — on the joints tu — but talātalam — the fourth planetary system below mahātalam — the fifth planetary system below tu — but gulphābhyām — situated on the calves prapadābhyām — on the upper or front portion of the feet rasātalam — the sixth planetary system below pātālam — the seventh planetary system below pāda-talataḥ — on the bottom or soles of the feet iti — thus loka-mayaḥ — full of planetary systems pumān — the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-kaṭyāṁ cātalaṁ kḷptam
tat
in His
kaṭyām
waist
ca
also
atalam
the first planetary system below the earth
kḷptam
situated
ūrubhyāṁ vitalaṁ vibhoḥ
ūrubhyām
on the thighs
vitalam
the second planetary system below
vibhoḥ
of the Lord
jānubhyāṁ sutalaṁ śuddhaṁ
jānubhyām
on the ankles
sutalam
the third planetary system below
śuddham
purified
jaṅghābhyāṁ tu talātalam
jaṅghābhyām
on the joints
tu
but
talātalam
the fourth planetary system below
mahātalaṁ tu gulphābhyāṁ
mahātalam
the fifth planetary system below
tu
but
gulphābhyām
situated on the calves
prapadābhyāṁ rasātalam
prapadābhyām
on the upper or front portion of the feet
rasātalam
the sixth planetary system below
pātālaṁ pāda-talata
pātālam
the seventh planetary system below
pāda-talataḥ
on the bottom or soles of the feet
iti lokamayaḥ pumān
iti
thus
loka-mayaḥ
full of planetary systems
pumān
the Lord.
My dear son Nārada, know from me that there are seven lower planetary systems out of the total fourteen. The first planetary system, known as Atala, is situated on the waist; the second, Vitala, is situated on the thighs; the third, Sutala, on the knees; the fourth, Talātala, on the shanks; the fifth, Mahātala, on the ankles; the sixth, Rasātala, on the upper portion of the feet; and the seventh, Pātāla, on the soles of the feet. Thus the virāṭ form of the Lord is full of all planetary systems.

Modern enterprisers (the astronauts who travel in space) may take information from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam that in space there are fourteen divisions of planetary systems. The situation is calculated from the earthly planetary system, which is called Bhūrloka. Above Bhūrloka is Bhuvarloka, and the topmost planetary system is called Satyaloka. These are the upper seven lokas, or planetary systems. And similarly there are seven lower planetary systems, known as Atala, Vitala, Sutala, Talātala, Mahātala, Rasātala and Pātāla lokas. All these planetary systems are scattered over the complete universe, which occupies an area of two billion times two billion square miles. The modern astronauts can travel only a few thousand miles away from the earth, and therefore their attempt to travel in the sky is something like child’s play on the shore of an expansive ocean. The moon is situated in the third status of the upper planetary system, and in the Fifth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam we shall be able to know the distant situation of the various planets scattered over the vast material sky. There are innumerable universes beyond the one in which we are put, and all these material universes cover only an insignificant portion of the spiritual sky, which is described above as sanātana Brahmaloka. The Supreme Lord very kindly invites the intelligent human beings to return home, back to Godhead, in the following verse of the Bhagavad-gītā (8.16) :

ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino ’rjuna mām upetya tu kaunteya punar janma na vidyate

Beginning from Satyaloka, the topmost planet of the universe, situated just below the eternal Brahmaloka, as described above, all the planets are material. And one’s situation in any of the many material planets is still subject to the laws of material nature, namely birth, death, old age and disease. But one can get complete liberation from all the above-mentioned material pangs when one enters into the eternal Brahmaloka sanātana atmosphere, the kingdom of God. Therefore liberation, as contemplated by the speculative philosophers and the mystics, is possible only when one becomes a devotee of the Lord. Anyone who is not a devotee cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Only by attainment of a service attitude in the transcendental position can one enter into the kingdom of Godhead. Therefore the speculative philosophers, as well as the mystics, must first of all be attracted to the devotional cult before they can factually attain liberation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Atala is the buttocks of the Lord. Vitala is his thighs. Pure Sutala is his knees. Talātala is his shanks. Mahātala is his ankles, Rasātala is the top of his feet, and Pātāla is the soles of his feet.
Commentary

Now the method of meditation on fourteen planets is described. The seven upper planets were already described. The seven lower planets are now described in two verses. Sutalam is considered pure because Prahlāda, Bali and other devotees reside there.

The cosmos has fourteen planetary systems, vast beyond what astronauts can probe. Recognizing the scale humbles our 'progress' and reframes our 'exploration' as a child wading at the ocean's edge.
Reflection Questions
  • Does my picture of 'the world' come from a tiny patch of beach or from this vaster map?
  • How would humility before this scale change my sense of what is urgent?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.42

↗
भूर्लोक: कल्पित: पद्‍भ्यां भुवर्लोकोऽस्य नाभित: । स्वर्लोक: कल्पितो मूर्ध्ना इति वा लोककल्पना ॥ ४२ ॥
bhūrlokaḥ kalpitaḥ padbhyāṁ
[bhoorlokah kalpitah padbhyaam]
bhuvarloko ’sya nābhitaḥ
[bhuvarloko ’sya naabhitah]
svarlokaḥ kalpito mūrdhnā
[svarlokah kalpito moordhnaa]
iti vā loka-kalpanā
[iti vaa loka-kalpanaa]
bhūrlokaḥ — the entire planetary system from Pātāla to the earthly planetary system kalpitaḥ — imagined padbhyām — situated on the legs bhuvarlokaḥ — the Bhuvarloka planetary system asya — of the universal form of the Lord nābhitaḥ — out of the navel abdomen svarlokaḥ — the higher planetary system, beginning with the heavenly planets kalpitaḥ — imagined mūrdhnā — from the chest to the head iti — thus vā — either loka — the planetary systems kalpanā — imagination.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūrlokaḥ kalpitaḥ padbhyāṁ
bhūrlokaḥ
the entire planetary system from Pātāla to the earthly planetary system
kalpitaḥ
imagined
padbhyām
situated on the legs
bhuvarloko ’sya nābhitaḥ
bhuvarlokaḥ
the Bhuvarloka planetary system
asya
of the universal form of the Lord
nābhitaḥ
out of the navel abdomen
svarlokaḥ kalpito mūrdhnā
svarlokaḥ
the higher planetary system, beginning with the heavenly planets
kalpitaḥ
imagined
mūrdhnā
from the chest to the head
iti vā loka-kalpanā
iti
thus
vā
either
loka
the planetary systems
kalpanā
imagination.
Others may divide the whole planetary system into three divisions, namely the lower planetary systems on the legs [up to the earth], the middle planetary systems on the navel, and the upper planetary systems [Svarloka] from the chest to the head of the Supreme Personality.

The three divisions of the complete planetary systems are here mentioned; fourteen are imagined by others, and that is also explained.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Second Canto, Fifth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Cause of All Causes.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Earth and the lower planets are imagined extend from the feet. Bhuvarloka is at the navel. Svarga-loka is imaged to be the head. This is how others imagine the planets on the universal form.
Commentary

Now the universal form is described in three parts. Bhūloka is considered with all the lower planets.

Chapter Six Second Description of the Universal Form: Vibhūtis of the Lord

Some divide the planetary systems in three (lower, middle, upper), others in fourteen. Different schemes; same Lord. Don't fight the map — use whichever clarifies that everything is on His body.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I argue about the map when I should be focusing on the territory?
  • Can I let differing descriptions point to the same reality and stop the quarrel?
📝 My note