Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.33.34
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
yat-pāda-paṅkaja-parāga-niṣeva-tṛptāḥ
—
satisfied by serving the dust of His lotus feet
Long sub-compound from synonyms. Pāda-paṅkaja (lotus feet) + parāga (dust) + niṣevā (service). The Gauḍīya master-image: not the feet themselves but the dust of the feet — the lowest part of the lowest part. Caitanya-mahāprabhu: tomāra caraṇa-renu — even the dust is the goal.
-
yoga-prabhāva-vidhuta-akhila-karma-bandhāḥ
—
whose bondage of fruitive activity is washed away by the power of yoga
Long sub-compound. Yoga-prabhāva (yogic power) + vidhuta (shaken off) + karma-bandha (karmic bondage). The bhakti and jñāna paths are both named — both produce unbound persons. Gauḍīyas: both are derivative; the Lord's own freedom is original.
-
icchayā ātta-vapuṣaḥ
—
of Him who accepts transcendental bodies by His desire
Sub-compound. Icchā (desire/will) + ātta (accepted) + vapus (body). The crucial line: His bodies are willed, not karma-imposed. Gauḍīyas: this verse alone refutes any avatāra-vāda that subjects the Lord to material descent. He chooses each body.
-
kutaḥ eva bandhaḥ
—
where indeed bondage?
Kutaḥ (whence) + eva (indeed) + bandha (bondage). Rhetorical climax. Gauḍīyas: the chapter's tightest single line. The question is not answered with 'no bondage' but with the impossibility of the question — the very category does not apply.
Even the devotees of the Lord are not bound by dharma and adharma. The devotees of the Lord, satisfied with serving exclusively the dust of his lotus feet, by the power of bhakti yoga (yoga), become liberated from the bondage of karma, and wander about freely. What is the question of bondage for the Lord of those devotees, who accepted the bodies of others wives by his unrestricted free will (iccayatta vapusah)?
The point is made clear by another kaimutya. Yat means yasya (whose) and is connected with tasya in the last line. How can there be bondage for the Lord (tasya) who accepts a body by his will, whose (yasya) lotus feet satisfy devotees who constantly serve (ni--ṣeva) the particles of beauty (parāga) from those feet though meditation. Tṛptā means their intelligence does not wander anywhere else: they are full of prema. By the power of his (yasya) bhakti-yoga, the sages, free of all material bondage, wander about at their will, and though doing prescribed or unprescribed actions, are not bound up. Therefore, how can the Lord be bound up? Not at all. Having shown the kaimutya, from the particular nature of the description, his absence of bondage is shown. He brings his body into the material world by his own will, not under the control of karma like the jīvas. Therefore the Lord sometimes transgresses dharma without faults. An example is defeating Durvāsā to give mercy to his special devotee Ambarīṣa.
The devotees serve particles of beauty (pollen) emanating from the Lord’s lotus feet. This shows their special bhakti with humility in serving. Niseva indicates constant service, by their nature. They are attached to such service. Or parāga indicates service at a distance and niseva means a little service. They serve without fear, proudly (dṛptāḥ in some versions) or completely satisfied (tṛptāḥ), even doing a little service at a distance. They do their activities with regard for rules or prohibitions, at their will because they are not bound by those rules since they are not attached to them (nahyamānāḥ). Even (api) the sages destroy the bondage of karma accrued for millions of births by the power of aṣṭāṅga-yoga or jñāṇa in samādhi. Api indicates the lesser status of yogīs compared to devotees. They are proud (dṛptāḥ) of their achievement. The Lord has a body which he manifests (ātta) by his will (icchayā). He is supremely independent. Or he manifests his body with a desire to distribute his prema-bhakti. Thus it is suitable that he also does not respect the rules and prohibitions. Or he manifests his body as an avatāra such as Matsya or Kūrma by desire of the devotees. This shows his supreme power. What then is the question of his being bound up? There is no bondage at all. Or even the sages destroy karma by the power of bhakti-yoga (yoga). Then what to speak of the devotees who destroy karma from the very beginning of their practice? Or the devotees destroy karmas. And even the yogīs absorbed in actions destroy karmas. There are three types of people. There are sages who are householders, engaged in karmas. There are jñānīs who wander freely of two types: those who practice yoga and those who practice karma (those described in the present interpretation). The last is the lowest in status. Even this person wanders freely. What to speak of all the devotees being free, because of being dear to the Lord? The example is given to destroy Parīkṣit’s doubt.
- Are you trying to escape activity, or to escape false identification with it?
- Where could service replace anxiety as your guiding mood?
Even the great sages, freed by yoga, move freely without binding — like birds whose chains have been cut and who now fly without thought of the cage. If they are unbound, how could He who is the source of every freedom be bound? The Lord's body is His will, not His karma.
The Nava-yogendras of SB Canto 11 — born of Ṛṣabhadeva — roam the worlds as paramahaṁsas, unconditioned by karma, yet acting in apparent ways. They eat, walk, speak, but no āśraya of bondage exists in them.
Gauḍīyas read 10.33.34 in their light: if these jīva-mukta sages have no karma-bandha, the Bhagavān whose icchā is the cause of their freedom is a fortiori free. The svairam caranti munayaḥ of this verse is their portrait.
My note
Source: vedabase.io