FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

4.27 · Attack by Caṇḍavega on the City of King Purañjana; the Character of Kālakanyā

30 verses · 🖨 Class prep
P Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (18892 chars)

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat appeared in the lineage of Prthu. While his sons, the Pracetas, were performing austerities in the water, he was busily engaged in mundane, material affairs. Narada Muni appeared on the scene and spiritually enlightened him through an allegory involving a character named Puranjana (the soul), who resides within the city of nine gates (the body). The powerful story instigated a profound existential awakening within the King, who realised how materially entrenched he had become.

Previous Strong Next Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Last updated 1 year ago

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31)

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat appeared in the lineage of Prthu. While his sons, the Pracetas, were performing austerities in the water, he was busily engaged in mundane, material affairs. Narada Muni appeared on the scene and spiritually enlightened him through an allegory involving a character named Puranjana (the soul), who resides within the city of nine gates (the body). The powerful story instigated a profound existential awakening within the King, who realised how materially entrenched he had become.

Previous Strong Next Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Last updated 1 year ago

Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Chapter 24 Maitreya continued by discussing the descendants in the family of Prthu. When he came to Pracinabarhisat and his ten sons, the Pracetas, he paused to narrate more. When requested by their father to procreate, the Pracetas first went to practise austerities for 10,000 years in the water. En route, they met Lord Siva who taught them a series of beautiful prayers known as the Rudra-gita. In these prayers, one first offers respects to the four expansions of Vishnu and the presiding deities of various elements, after which the Lord’s glorious form is described, along with the super-excellence of bhakti . Siva was taught this prayer by Lord Brahma, and he encouraged the Pracetas to attentively recite it with great devotion.

Previous P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Next Puranjana Story Last updated 1 year ago

Pracetas Rule

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracetas Rule Chapter 30, 31 Maitreya next reverted back to the activities of the Pracetas after they had completed their 10,000 years of austerity. [ 14 ] Satisfied by their cooperation, friendship and austerity, the Lord appeared before the Pracetas and glorified their activities. He instructed them to marry, procreate and become exemplars of bhakti in householder life. Having received this instruction, the Pracetas offered eloquent prayers to the Lord and begged to remain in the association of Vaisnavas so they could always hear about Krishna. When the Pracetas emerged from the water, they saw that the earth was covered with overgrown trees, preventing progressive agriculture and farming of the land. In anger, they generated fire from their mouths and began burning everything up so that the earth would be cleared for cultivation. After Brahma pacified them, they married Marisa, the daughter of Pamaloca, who was left in the care of the trees. Daksa, who had offended Siva, was reborn from their union. The Pracetas ruled for thousands of years, and then decided to renounce it all. They left Marisa in the care of Daksa and departed the kingdom for a life of spiritual absorption. After reaching their destination, they chanced upon Narada Muni, who instructed them to perform undiverted bhakti , which captures the Lord in the heart.

Previous Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Next Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Last updated 1 year ago

Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Chapter 29 Pracinabarhisat humbly admitted that he didn’t completely understand the deep purport of the story. Narada Muni thus elaborated on the allegory and comprehensively detailed how the conditioned soul becomes entangled in material life. Narada thus urged the King to renounce material activity and cultivate his spiritual life. He then narrated the allegory of a deer to invoke a further sense of urgency within Pracinabarhisat – the deer is grazing and enjoying the charming atmosphere, completely oblivious to the fact that a tiger is about to devour it. Narada reminded him that death was fast approaching, and his consciousness at that crucial hour would determine his next life situation. He specifically explained how the subtle body carries the soul to its next destination. When the King submitted that his illusion was over, Narada Muni happily left for Siddhaloka. Pracinabarhisat then handed over the kingdom to his sons and went to Kapilasrama to pursue spiritual perfection, which he eventually attained.

Previous Puranjana Story Next Pracetas Rule Last updated 1 year ago

Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Chapter 31 Having concluded the narration of Uttanapada (the younger son of Svayambhuva Manu) and his descendants, Sukadeva Goswami prepared himself to describe the activities of Priyavrata (the older son of Svayambhuva Manu) and his descendants. Vidura and Maitreya’s conversation thus reached its conclusion. Feeling inspired and purified by the exchange, Vidura fell at Maitreya’s feet and offered all respect and thanks. He then left for the city of Hastinapura to see his relatives and deliver transcendental knowledge to his brother. [ 15 ]

Previous Pracetas Rule Next Root of Devotion Last updated 1 year ago

Puranjana Story

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Puranjana Story Chapter 25, 26, 27, 28 While performing their austerities, the Pracetas happily recited the prayers. Meanwhile, their father, King Pracinabarhisat, was engrossed in materialistic endeavours and oblivious to the spiritual dimension of life. The itinerant preacher, Narada Muni, arrived on the scene and resolved to philosophically enlighten the King through the allegorical story of Puranjana. Long ago, a King named Puranjana was looking for a suitable place to fulfil his desires, when he chanced upon a beautiful city which had nine gates and all the necessary facilities. This, he thought, was the ideal place. Accompanied by his friend, Avijnata, he entered that city, and later became attracted by Puranjani, a woman who had ten servants. After marriage, she faithfully arranged varieties of material pleasures in the city for one hundred years, during which time the King became completely henpecked. Explanation: Wandering in the material world, the spirit soul (Puranjana) accepts a material body (city of nine gates). Though accompanied by the Supersoul (Avijnata), his attention is attracted by mundane religiosity and sense gratification (Puranjani). He thus wastes his valuable years in temporary pleasures that amount to nothing. Once, Puranjana abandoned his wife and went on a hunting excursion, indiscriminately killing many innocent animals on his journey. Hungry and thirsty, he eagerly returned to the palace, only to find the Queen lying on the ground looking depressed and emaciated. He regretted leaving her and sought forgiveness for his nefarious activities. Being pacified, the Queen regained her luster and enjoyed sexual union with him. The King begot 1,100 sons and 110 daughters, who were duly married and had their own children, and thus the city became populated. Puranjana became tormented by family demands and was plundered due to his attachments. Explanation: Sometimes, one gives up his religiosity and intelligence (abandoning Puranjani), and hedonistically runs after the opposite sex (hunting animals). Frustrated by such whimsical attempts for pleasure, one returns, repents, and regains their good sense. They again adopt a pious life, but remain absorbed in material pursuits (sexual union with Puranjani). The activities of such bewildered souls produce a network of karmic reactions which bind them to the material world (expanding family of Puranjana). Some years later, when King Chandavega and his soldiers attacked, a five- hooded snake attempted to defend the city. Puranjana, himself absorbed in sense gratification, paid little attention to the attack, while the serpent was becoming weaker and weaker. Kalakanya was Chandavega’s daughter, and she was renowned for discretely attacking people. She entered the city with her associates and embraced Puranjana, while her other associates wreaked havoc. When the situation deteriorated, the city was set ablaze and the King was forced to leave, embroiled in thoughts of his family and wife. After leaving the city, Puranjana was tormented by all the animals that he had mercilessly killed earlier in his life. Explanation: The body is eventually attacked by time (Chandavega) and our life energy (five-hooded snake) is depleted. Being preoccupied with material endeavours, old age eventually arrives (Kalakanya), almost imperceptibly, along with diseases, fear and ill-fate. The body gradually dwindles and thus becomes uninhabitable (city is set ablaze), and the soul is forced to leave, absorbed in thoughts of various attachments and desires (worry for family and dependents). Moving to the next chapter of existence, the soul is subjected to a series of karmic reactions for his misdeeds (attack of animals). Because he remembered his wife, Puranjana went on to become the daughter of King Vidarbha (Vaidarbhi), and was married to Malayadhvaja. After Vaidarbhi gave birth to children, Malayadhvaja retired from household life and dedicated himself to spiritual pursuits. Vaidarbhi followed him, and when he died, she arranged his funeral pyre and prepared to enter the fire. Just then, an old brahmana friend of Puranjana came and questioned her. He said that they were old friends, but she had forgotten him, having engaged in the illusory relationships and activities of this world. Explanation: If one is fortunate, they receive the seed of bhakti from a spiritual master (Malayadhvaja) and this gives rise to the practice of devotional service (birth of children). Those practices of bhakti expand unlimitedly (further children), and when one is mature, the spiritual master retires (Malayadhvaja renounces). The disciple always follows in the footsteps of the spiritual master, and is constantly absorbed in the fire of following his instructions. The Lord (old brahmana friend) appears before such a dedicated devotee and enlightens him with the knowledge necessary to return to the spiritual world. Narada thus concluded the allegorical story.

Previous Pracetas Hear Rudra-Gita Next Pracinabarhisat Attains Perfection Last updated 1 year ago

Root of Devotion

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion “The topmost benediction for those who are living in this material world and are subjected to the repetition of birth and death (transmigration) is association with pure devotees. One should search out such pure devotees and remain with them. That will make one completely happy, even though living within the material world. This Krishna consciousness movement is started for that purpose. A person who is overly affected materially may take advantage of this movement and become intimately associated with it. In this way the confused and frustrated inhabitants of this material world may find the highest happiness in association with devotees.” ( SB 4.30.34 ) Maharaja Pracinabarhisat was rescued from the depths of material entanglement and transported to the summit of spiritual absorption. We see this incredible transformation in many of Srimad-Bhagavatam’s personalities, and may have even witnessed similar things in the lives of those around us. If we pause for thought, we can appreciate it even in our own lives. What is the root cause which triggers a spiritual turnaround?

Previous Priyavrata – Elder Son of Manu Next The Beginning Last updated 1 year ago

Proofreaders of Devotion

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion Proofreaders of Devotion “I don’t read the book, I read the author. I first check whether the author is authentic. Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura trained me in proofreading, so I always look for what is right or wrong. But I am not a proofreader of the press only; I am a proofreader of the world. I proofread men; I proofread religions. I dissect their faults and try to correct them.” (Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura) Devotees undoubtedly give us entrance into spiritual life, but they are also absolutely necessary if we want to progressively continue our journey. While writing the story of our life, we need proofreaders by our side. Brevity – give any piece of writing to an editor and they’ll likely compress several long paragraphs into a few short lines. They reveal the substance, and leave the rest by the wayside. In the same way, saintly persons can reveal the true substance of our spirituality. We may overembellish and exaggerate the truth, but when we appear before a transcendental proofreader, the degree of genuine sincerity, quality and devotion in our spirituality becomes strikingly apparent. Accuracy – when we pen down our thoughts, there may be mistakes in grammar, spelling and sentence formation. Proofreaders can detect, fix and ensure a smooth read. In the same way, our lives are riddled with mistakes – risky misconceptions, bad decisions, false assumptions and unhelpful attitudes. Saintly persons can detect these problems and fix them before they begin to impede our progressive journey in the story of life. Clarity – writers know what they mean but people can easily misinterpret. Proofreaders ensure that the well-intentioned meaning of the author is not misconstrued by the reader. In the same way, we may adopt a sincere and noble approach in spiritual life, but be unaware of things that may be detrimental and counterproductive to what we are trying to achieve. Proofreaders stand external to the picture of our life and flag up potentially injurious behaviours that we are oblivious to. Potency – even if a piece of writing is substantial, accurate and clear, a proofreader may well reword it to communicate the same, but with greater force and clarity. Saintly persons can, in the same way, show us a more efficient, effective and powerful way to lead our lives. We may not be doing anything wrong, but they can reveal a more effective way of reaching our goals and realising our dreams. It’s easy to get stuck into the standard ways of living and functioning, becoming averse to new approaches to life. As years go by, we get tempted to start flying solo. We should, however, always stop and consider: who is proofreading my life?

Previous Why is this Important? Next R.E.A.P Last updated 1 year ago

The Beginning

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion The Beginning In Madhurya Kadambini, Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura scientifically analyses the soul’s spiritual journey. He systematically delineates a sequence of eight stages that a sincere and serious practitioner will progress through before arriving at the ultimate goal, pure love of God ( prema ). Before describing the journey, Visvanatha Chakravarti spends considerable time discussing how one begins that spiritual journey. Our attraction for devotional activities (which is carried from previous lives) impels us towards further execution of those devotional activities in this life. That subsequent execution further increases one’s attraction. But where does the initial attraction come from? During our material sojourn, what is the turning point at which one begins cultivating their relationship with God? How is that seed of bhakti implanted within the heart? Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura explores a variety of options. Some may posit that the cause of bhakti is good fortune. Such an explanation is inconclusive, since the question remains as to how that good fortune arises. Others may propose that the cause of bhakti is good karma and pious activity. This is unacceptable since piety is still a material activity, and how could something material be the cause of something divinely spiritual? Some may posit that Krishna is the cause of bhakti . But then we face another problem since Krishna says “I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all.” ( BG 9.29 ). With that in mind, why would He bestow good fortune on some and not others? In a deeply realised and illuminating fashion, Visvanatha Chakravarti Thakura reveals that the journey to pure love ultimately begins when one contacts a devotee of Krishna: “ The root cause of devotional service to Lord Krishna is association with advanced devotees. Even when one’s dormant love for Krishna awakens, association with devotees is still most essential.” ( CC Madhya 22.83 ) Since Vaisnavas have bhakti implanted within their hearts, they are impelled and equipped to give it to others, and in this way instigate the spiritual journey of another. Thus, in the deepest sense, bhakti is the cause of bhakti . Although this analysis may seem deeply philosophical, it’s incredibly practical and simple. We have all experienced that even ordinary love can’t be bought, forced, or manufactured. It is the product of an individual’s free will and desire. Only love creates love, and only divine love creates divine love. So, if we want divine love, we must encounter someone who has it. If we are fortunate to meet such a person, and receptive enough to accept that divine gift, our spiritual journey begins.

Previous Root of Devotion Next Why is this Important? Last updated 1 year ago

Why is this Important?

P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Root of Devotion Why is this Important? Knowing that saintly association is the root cause of devotion is invaluable information. Firstly, it helps us develop a deep sense of gratitude and appreciation for Vaisnavas. Anyone who is on the spiritual journey, and has awakened bhakti in their heart is special indeed. They have the potential to transform people’s lives, and they should be honoured and valued with utmost appreciation. Secondly, it gives us a clue as to how we can instigate spiritual change in the world. As we find bigger and better ways to expose the masses of people to saintly association of Vaisnavas, we can rest assured that hearts will be touched and transformed. Thirdly, and a little closer to home, we can appreciate that if we fill our lives with the quality association of Vaisnavas, then advancement on the spiritual path is assured.

Previous The Beginning Next Proofreaders of Devotion Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.1

↗
नारद उवाच इत्थं पुरञ्जनं सध्र्यग्वशमानीय विभ्रमै: । पुरञ्जनी महाराज रेमे रमयती पतिम् ॥ १ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
itthaṁ purañjanaṁ sadhryag
[ittham puranjanam sadhryag]
vaśamānīya vibhramaiḥ
[vashamaaneeya vibhramaih]
purañjanī mahārāja
[puranjanee mahaaraaja]
reme ramayatī patim
[reme ramayatee patim]
nāradaḥ uvāca — Nārada said ittham — thus purañjanam — King Purañjana sadhryak — completely vaśamānīya — bringing under her control vibhramaiḥ — by her charms purañjanī — the wife of King Purañjana mahā-rāja — O King reme — enjoyed ramayatī — giving all satisfaction patim — to her husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ uvāca
Nārada said
itthaṁ purañjanaṁ sadhryag
ittham
thus
purañjanam
King Purañjana
sadhryak
completely
vaśamānīya vibhramaiḥ
vaśamānīya
bringing under her control
vibhramaiḥ
by her charms
purañjanī mahārāja
purañjanī
the wife of King Purañjana
mahā-rāja
O King
reme ramayatī patim
reme
enjoyed
ramayatī
giving all satisfaction
patim
to her husband.
The great sage Nārada continued: My dear King, after bewildering her husband in different ways and bringing him under her control, the wife of King Purañjana gave him all satisfaction and enjoyed sex life with him.

After hunting in the forest, King Purañjana returned home, and after refreshing himself by taking a bath and eating nice food, he searched for his wife. When he saw her lying down on the ground without a bed, as if neglected, and devoid of any proper dress, he became very much aggrieved. He then became attracted to her and began to enjoy her company. A living entity is similarly engaged in the material world in sinful activities. These sinful activities may be compared to King Purañjana’s hunting in the forest.

A sinful life can be counteracted by various processes of religion such as yajña, vrata and dāna — that is, the performance of sacrifices, the taking of a vow for some religious ritual, and the giving of charity. In this way one may become free from the reactions of sinful life and at the same time awaken his original Kṛṣṇa consciousness. By coming home, taking his bath, eating nice foodstuffs, getting refreshed and searching out his wife, King Purañjana came to his good consciousness in his family life. In other words, a systematic family life as enjoined in the Vedas is better than an irresponsible sinful life. If a husband and wife combine together in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and live together peacefully, that is very nice. However, if a husband becomes too much attracted by his wife and forgets his duty in life, the implications of materialistic life will again resume. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has therefore recommended, anāsaktasya viṣayān ( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.2.255). Without being attached by sex, the husband and wife may live together for the advancement of spiritual life. The husband should engage in devotional service, and the wife should be faithful and religious according to the Vedic injunctions. Such a combination is very good. However, if the husband becomes too much attracted to the wife due to sex, the position becomes very dangerous. Women in general are very much sexually inclined. Indeed, it is said that a woman’s sex desire is nine times stronger than a man’s. It is therefore a man’s duty to keep a woman under his control by satisfying her, giving her ornaments, nice food and clothes, and engaging her in religious activities. Of course, a woman should have a few children and in this way not be disturbing to the man. Unfortunately, if the man becomes attracted to the woman simply for sex enjoyment, then family life becomes abominable.

The great politician Cāṇakya Paṇḍita has said, bhāryā rūpavatī śatruḥ : a beautiful wife is an enemy. Of course every woman in the eyes of her husband is very beautiful. Others may see her as not very beautiful, but the husband, being very much attracted to her, sees her always as very beautiful. If the husband sees the wife as very beautiful, it is to be assumed that he is too much attracted to her. This attraction is the attraction of sex. The whole world is captivated by the two modes of material nature rajo-guṇa and tamo-guṇa, passion and ignorance. Generally women are very much passionate and are less intelligent; therefore somehow or other a man should not be under the control of their passion and ignorance. By performing bhakti-yoga, or devotional service, a man can be raised to the platform of goodness. If a husband situated in the mode of goodness can control his wife, who is in passion and ignorance, the woman is benefited. Forgetting her natural inclination for passion and ignorance, the woman becomes obedient and faithful to her husband, who is situated in goodness. Such a life becomes very welcome. The intelligence of the man and woman may then work very nicely together, and they can make a progressive march toward spiritual realization. Otherwise, the husband, coming under the control of the wife, sacrifices his quality of goodness and becomes subservient to the qualities of passion and ignorance. In this way the whole situation becomes polluted.

The conclusion is that a household life is better than a sinful life devoid of responsibility, but if in the household life the husband becomes subordinate to the wife, involvement in materialistic life again becomes prominent. In this way a man’s material bondage becomes enhanced. Because of this, according to the Vedic system, after a certain age a man is recommended to abandon his family life for the stages of vānaprastha and sannyāsa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: O King! Purañjana’s wife, who gave him enjoyment, enjoyed with her husband Purañjana, who was completely controlled by her charming actions. The Twenty-seventh Chapter describes how Purañjana, endowed with proper intelligence performed pious acts, but became afflicted by old age and disease, which is described through another story. The dharmic jīva, encountering some obstacles, becomes contaminated internally by various sins. He then regains his intelligence and performs charity, vows, and atonements. However, because the contamination does not leave his mind, he becomes torn apart by constant regret. By good fortune he attains his proper intelligence. This has been described. This chapter describes his household life with proper conduct and intelligence rules by dharma as previously. He was controlled completely (sadhryak) by her affectionate actions (vibhramaiḥ). Giving up the inclination for sinful life, the jīva becomes attached to dharmic intelligence as before.
Having brought him under control, the queen gave him satisfaction and enjoyed life with him. Reconciled-but-controlled is a real outcome; satisfaction at the cost of agency is a kind of bondage.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I 'satisfied' at the cost of agency I haven't noticed surrendering?
  • Whose control over me feels comfortable precisely because it produces consistent satisfaction?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.2

↗
स राजा महिषीं राजन् सुस्‍नातां रुचिराननाम् । कृतस्वस्त्ययनां तृप्तामभ्यनन्ददुपागताम् ॥ २ ॥
sa rājā mahiṣīṁ rājan
[sa raajaa mahisheem raajan]
susnātāṁ rucirānanām
[susnaataam ruchiraananaam]
kṛta-svastyayanāṁ tṛptām
[krita-svastyayanaam triptaam]
abhyanandad upāgatām
[abhyanandad upaagataam]
saḥ — he rājā — the King mahiṣīm — the Queen rājan — O King su-snātām — nicely bathed rucira-ānanām — attractive face kṛta-svasti-ayanām — dressed with auspicious garments and ornaments tṛptām — satisfied abhyanandat — he welcomed upāgatām — approached.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa rājā mahiṣīṁ rājan
saḥ
he
rājā
the King
mahiṣīm
the Queen
rājan
O King
susnātāṁ rucirānanām
su-snātām
nicely bathed
rucira-ānanām
attractive face
kṛta-svastyayanāṁ tṛptām
kṛta-svasti-ayanām
dressed with auspicious garments and ornaments
tṛptām
satisfied
abhyanandad upāgatām
abhyanandat
he welcomed
upāgatām
approached.
The Queen took her bath and dressed herself nicely with all auspicious garments and ornaments. After taking food and becoming completely satisfied, she returned to the King. Upon seeing her beautifully decorated attractive face, the King welcomed her with all devotion.

A woman is generally accustomed to dress herself nicely with fine garments and decorative ornaments. She may even sometimes wear flowers in her hair. Women especially dress themselves up in the evening because the husband comes home in the evening after working hard all day. It is the duty of the wife to dress herself up very nicely so that when her husband returns home he becomes attracted by her dress and cleanliness and thus becomes satisfied. In other words, the wife is the inspiration of all good intelligence. Upon seeing one’s wife dressed nicely, one can think very soberly about family business. When a person is too anxious about family affairs, he cannot discharge his family duties nicely. A wife is therefore supposed to be an inspiration and should keep the husband’s intelligence in good order so that they can combinedly prosecute the affairs of family life without impediment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! The King welcomed the satisfied Queen with attractive face, who had bathed, dressed auspiciously, and then approached him. Seeing the happiness of his dharmic intelligence, and freed from contaminations in his mind, he felt himself successful.
She bathed, dressed, ornamented, returned satisfied; he welcomed her with devotion. Intelligence properly groomed and well-fed becomes the soul's preferred company; preparation matters.
Reflection Questions
  • How well do I 'groom' my intelligence (study, rest, beauty) before bringing it to the soul's encounter?
  • Where do I greet a tired version of my own intelligence and call that union?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.3

↗
तयोपगूढ: परिरब्धकन्धरो रहोऽनुमन्त्रैरपकृष्टचेतन: । न कालरंहो बुबुधे दुरत्ययं दिवा निशेति प्रमदापरिग्रह: ॥ ३ ॥
tayopagūḍhaḥ parirabdha-kandharo
[tayopagoodhah parirabdha-kandharo]
raho ’numantrair apakṛṣṭa-cetanaḥ
[raho ’numantrair apakrishta-chetanah]
na kāla-raṁho bubudhe duratyayaṁ
[na kaala-ramho bubudhe duratyayam]
divā niśeti pramadā-parigrahaḥ
[divaa nisheti pramadaa-parigrahah]
tayā — by the Queen upagūḍhaḥ — was embraced parirabdha — embraced kandharaḥ — shoulders rahaḥ — in a solitary place anumantraiḥ — by joking words apakṛṣṭa-cetanaḥ — having degraded consciousness na — not kāla-raṁhaḥ — the passing of time bubudhe — was aware of duratyayam — impossible to overcome divā — day niśā — night iti — thus pramadā — by the woman parigrahaḥ — captivated.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayopagūḍhaḥ parirabdha-kandharo
tayā
by the Queen
upagūḍhaḥ
was embraced
parirabdha
embraced
kandharaḥ
shoulders
raho ’numantrair apakṛṣṭa-cetanaḥ
rahaḥ
in a solitary place
anumantraiḥ
by joking words
apakṛṣṭa-cetanaḥ
having degraded consciousness
na
not
na kāla-raṁho bubudhe duratyayaṁ
kāla-raṁhaḥ
the passing of time
bubudhe
was aware of
duratyayam
impossible to overcome
divā niśeti pramadā-parigrahaḥ
divā
day
niśā
night
iti
thus
pramadā
by the woman
parigrahaḥ
captivated.
Queen Purañjanī embraced the King, and the King also responded by embracing her shoulders. In this way, in a solitary place, they enjoyed joking words. Thus King Purañjana became very much captivated by his beautiful wife and deviated from his good sense. He forgot that the passing of days and nights meant that his span of life was being reduced without profit.

The word pramadā in this verse is very significant. A beautiful wife is certainly enlivening to her husband, but at the same time is the cause of degradation. The word pramadā means “enlivening” as well as “maddening.” Generally a householder does not take the passing of days and nights very seriously. A person in ignorance takes it as the usual course that days come, and after the days, the nights come. This is the law of material nature. But a man in ignorance does not know that when the sun rises early in the morning it begins to take away the balance of his life. Thus day after day the span of one’s life is reduced, and forgetting the duty of human life, the foolish man simply remains in the company of his wife and enjoys her in a secluded place. Such a condition is called apakṛṣṭa-cetana, or degraded consciousness. Human consciousness should be used for elevation to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. But when a person is too much attracted to his wife and family affairs, he does not take Kṛṣṇa consciousness very seriously. He thus becomes degraded, not knowing that he cannot buy back even a second of his life in return for millions of dollars. The greatest loss in life is passing time without understanding Kṛṣṇa. Every moment of our lives should be utilized properly, and the proper use of life is to increase devotional service to the Lord. Without devotional service to the Lord, the activities of life become simply a waste of time ( śrama eva hi kevalam ). Simply by becoming “dutiful” we do not make any profit in life. As confirmed in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.8) :

dharmaḥ sv-anuṣṭhitaḥ puṁsāṁ viṣvaksena-kathāsu yaḥ notpādayed yadi ratiṁ śrama eva hi kevalam

If after performing one’s occupational duty very perfectly one does not make progress in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, it should be understood that he has simply wasted his time in valueless labor.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Embraced by the Queen, held by the neck, attracted in his mind by her private jokes, captured by the women, he was not aware of the power of insurmountable time, of the passing of days and nights. He was attracted by her private, pleasing words (animantraiḥ). He lost his intelligence for crossing saṁsāra because of mantras concerning dharma and karma. He was not aware of the force of time because he had no detachment. He was not aware that day had passed and night had arrived.
They embraced and joked; he became captivated, deviating from good sense, forgetting time was passing. The captivation of intimacy can become temporal blindness; an hour feels like a moment because reckoning has stopped.
Reflection Questions
  • Which captivation in my life has been silently consuming hours I haven't accounted for?
  • Where would reintroducing a clock-check change my relationship with my own pleasure?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.4

↗
शयान उन्नद्धमदो महामना महार्हतल्पे महिषीभुजोपधि: । तामेव वीरो मनुते परं यत- स्तमोऽभिभूतो न निजं परं च यत् ॥ ४ ॥
śayāna unnaddha-mado mahā-manā
[shayaana unnaddha-mado mahaa-manaa]
mahārha-talpe mahiṣī-bhujopadhiḥ
[mahaarha-talpe mahishee-bhujopadhih]
tām eva vīro manute paraṁ yatas
[taam eva veero manute param yatas]
tamo-’bhibhūto na nijaṁ paraṁ ca yat
[tamo-’bhibhooto na nijam param cha yat]
śayānaḥ — lying down unnaddha-madaḥ — increasingly illusioned mahā-manāḥ — advanced in consciousness mahā-arha-talpe — on a valuable bedstead mahiṣī — of the Queen bhuja — arms upadhiḥ — pillow tām — her eva — certainly vīraḥ — the hero manute — he considered param — the goal of life yataḥ — from which tamaḥ — by ignorance abhibhūtaḥ — overwhelmed na — not nijam — his actual self param — the Supreme Personality of Godhead ca — and yat — what.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śayāna unnaddha-mado mahā-manā
śayānaḥ
lying down
unnaddha-madaḥ
increasingly illusioned
mahā-manāḥ
advanced in consciousness
mahā-arha-talpe
on a valuable bedstead
mahiṣī
of the Queen
mahārha-talpe mahiṣī-bhujopadhiḥ
bhuja
arms
upadhiḥ
pillow
tām eva vīro manute paraṁ yatas
tām
her
eva
certainly
vīraḥ
the hero
manute
he considered
param
the goal of life
yataḥ
from which
tamo-’bhibhūto na nijaṁ paraṁ ca yat
tamaḥ
by ignorance
abhibhūtaḥ
overwhelmed
na
not
nijam
his actual self
param
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
ca
and
yat
what.
In this way, increasingly overwhelmed by illusion, King Purañjana, although advanced in consciousness, remained always lying down with his head on the pillow of his wife’s arms. In this way he considered woman to be his ultimate life and soul. Becoming thus overwhelmed by the mode of ignorance, he could not understand the meaning of self-realization, whether regarding his own self or the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Human life is meant for self-realization. First of all one has to realize his own self, which is described in this verse as nijam. Then he has to understand or realize the Supersoul, or Paramātmā, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. However, when one becomes too much materially attached, he takes a woman to be everything. This is the basic principle of material attachment. In such a condition, one cannot realize his own self or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (5.5.2) it is therefore said, mahat-sevāṁ dvāram āhur vimuktes tamo-dvāraṁ yoṣitāṁ saṅgi-saṅgam. If one associates with mahātmās, or devotees, his path of liberation is opened. But if one becomes too much attached to women or to persons who are also attached to women — that is, attached to women directly or indirectly — he opens the tamo-dvāram, the door to the darkest region of hellish life.

King Purañjana was a great soul, highly intellectual and possessed of advanced consciousness, but due to his being too much addicted to women, his whole consciousness was covered. In the modern age the consciousness of people is too much covered by wine, women and flesh. Consequently, people are completely unable to make any progress in self-realization. The first step of self-realization is to know oneself as spirit soul apart from the body. In the second stage of self-realization, one comes to know that every soul, every individual living entity, is part and parcel of the Supreme Soul, Paramātmā, or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (15.7) :

mamaivāṁśo jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ manaḥ-ṣaṣṭhānīndriyāṇi prakṛti-sthāni karṣati

“The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal fragmental parts. Due to conditioned life, they are struggling very hard with the six senses, which include the mind.”

All living entities are part and parcel of the Supreme Lord. Unfortunately, in this present civilization both men and women are allowed to be attracted to one another from the very beginning of life, and because of this they are completely unable to come to the platform of self-realization. They do not know that without self-realization they suffer the greatest loss in the human form of life. Thinking of a woman always within one’s heart is tantamount to lying down with a woman on a valuable bedstead. The heart is the bedstead, and it is the most valuable bedstead. When a man thinks of women and money, he lies down and rests on the arms of his beloved woman or wife. In this way he overindulges in sex life and thus becomes unfit for self-realization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lying down on a valuable bed on the pillow of his wife’s arms, under extreme illusion, generous in giving charity, he thought his wife, not the jīva or the Supreme Lord, to be the ultimate goal in life, , because he was defeated by ignorance. He made a pillow his wife’s arms. In another version, bhujopadhi becomes a modifier of śayānaḥ. Because of sex life he thought she was the ultimate. He thought that association with his wife was the goal of life. Another version has amanuta instead of manute. He did not consider himself or anyone else, because he was defeated by ignorance. The spiritual meaning is that because of association with dharma represented by his wife, he became attached to dharma, and that became his goal of life, rather than liberation, because he did not know himself as jīva and did not know the Lord. He became engrossed in dharma (unnada-madaḥ) and thought of performing charities (mahā-manāḥ). He slept on a valuable bed: he was engrossed in pious acts. He made a pillow (upadhi) of his wife’s arms: he was covered (upādhi) by ignorance.
Always lying on his wife's arm-pillow, he considered woman to be life and soul; the mode of ignorance covered him. Treating the relationship as ultimate is a mode-of-ignorance error; love is real but not ultimate.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose arm-pillow has become my default position?
  • Where does treating a partner as 'life and soul' actually reduce the love I think I'm honoring?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.5

↗
तयैवं रममाणस्य कामकश्मलचेतस: । क्षणार्धमिव राजेन्द्र व्यतिक्रान्तं नवं वय: ॥ ५ ॥
tayaivaṁ ramamāṇasya
[tayaivam ramamaanasya]
kāma-kaśmala-cetasaḥ
[kaama-kashmala-chetasah]
kṣaṇārdham iva rājendra
[kshanaardham iva raajendra]
vyatikrāntaṁ navaṁ vayaḥ
[vyatikraantam navam vayah]
tayā — with her evam — in this way ramamāṇasya — enjoying kāma — full of lust kaśmala — sinful cetasaḥ — his heart kṣaṇa-ardham — in half a moment iva — like rāja-indra — O King vyatikrāntam — expired navam — new vayaḥ — life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayaivaṁ ramamāṇasya
tayā
with her
evam
in this way
ramamāṇasya
enjoying
kāma-kaśmala-cetasaḥ
kāma
full of lust
kaśmala
sinful
cetasaḥ
his heart
kṣaṇārdham iva rājendra
kṣaṇa-ardham
in half a moment
iva
like
rāja-indra
O King
vyatikrāntaṁ navaṁ vayaḥ
vyatikrāntam
expired
navam
new
vayaḥ
life.
My dear King Prācīnabarhiṣat, in this way King Purañjana, with his heart full of lust and sinful reactions, began to enjoy sex with his wife, and in this way his new life and youth expired in half a moment.

Śrīla Govinda dāsa Ṭhākura has sung:

e-dhana, yauvana, putra, parijana, ithe ki āche paratīti re kamala-dala-jala, jīvana ṭalamala, bhaja huṁ hari-pada nīti re

In this verse Śrīla Govinda dāsa actually says that there is no bliss in the enjoyment of youthful life. In youth a person becomes very lusty to enjoy all kinds of sense objects. The sense objects are form, taste, smell, touch and sound. The modern scientific method, or advancement of scientific civilization, encourages the enjoyment of these five senses. The younger generation is very pleased to see a beautiful form, to hear radio messages of material news and sense gratificatory songs, to smell nice scents and nice flowers, and to touch the soft body or breasts of a young woman and gradually touch the sex organs. All of this is also very pleasing to the animals; therefore in human society there are restrictions in the enjoyment of the five sense objects. If one does not follow, he becomes exactly like an animal.

Thus in this verse it is specifically stated, kāma-kaśmala-cetasaḥ: the consciousness of King Purañjana was polluted by lusty desires and sinful activities. In the previous verse it is stated that Purañjana, although advanced in consciousness, lay down on a very soft bed with his wife. This indicates that he indulged too much in sex. The words navaṁ vayaḥ are also significant in this verse. They indicate the period of youth from age sixteen to thirty. These thirteen or fifteen years of life are years in which one can very strongly enjoy the senses. When one comes to this age he thinks that life will go on and that he will simply continue enjoying his senses. But “time and tide wait for no man” — the span of youth expires very quickly. One who wastes his life simply by committing sinful activities in youth immediately becomes disappointed and disillusioned when the brief period of youth is over. The material enjoyments of youth are especially pleasing to a person who has no spiritual training. If one is trained only according to the bodily conception of life, he simply leads a disappointed life because bodily sense enjoyment finishes within forty years or so. After forty years, one simply leads a disillusioned life because he has no spiritual knowledge. For such a person, the expiration of youth occurs in half a moment. Thus King Purañjana’s pleasure, which he took in lying down with his wife, expired very quickly.

Kāma-kaśmala-cetasaḥ also indicates that unrestricted sense enjoyment is not allowed in the human form of life by the laws of nature. If one enjoys his senses unrestrictedly, he leads a sinful life. The animals do not violate the laws of nature. For example, the sex impulse in animals is very strong during certain months of the year. The lion is very powerful. He is a flesh-eater and is very strong, but he enjoys sex only once in a year. Similarly, according to religious injunctions a man is restricted to enjoying sex only once in a month, after the menstrual period of the wife, and if the wife is pregnant, he is not allowed sex life at all. That is the law for human beings. A man is allowed to keep more than one wife because he cannot enjoy sex when the wife is pregnant. If he wants to enjoy sex at such a time, he may go to another wife who is not pregnant. These are laws mentioned in the Manu-saṁhitā and other scriptures.

These laws and scriptures are meant for human beings. As such, if one violates these laws, he becomes sinful. The conclusion is that unrestricted sense enjoyment means sinful activities. Illicit sex is sex that violates the laws given in the scriptures. When one violates the laws of the scriptures, or the Vedas, he commits sinful activities. One who is engaged in sinful activities cannot change his consciousness. Our real function is to change our consciousness from kaśmala, sinful consciousness, to Kṛṣṇa, the supreme pure. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā ( paraṁ brahma paraṁ dhāma pavitraṁ paramaṁ bhavān ), Kṛṣṇa is the supreme pure, and if we change our consciousness from material enjoyment to Kṛṣṇa, we become purified. This is the process recommended by Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu as the process of ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam, cleansing the mirror of the heart.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! With his heart soiled by lust as he enjoyed with his wife, his youth passed away in half a moment
With heart full of lust and sin, his youth expired in half a moment. Subjective duration in the wrong absorption is treacherous; decades pass while you think it's an evening.
Reflection Questions
  • Which half-moment of absorption is actually 'eating' a decade in my life?
  • Where do I need a calendar-check on what feels like just a season?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.6

↗
तस्यामजनयत्पुत्रान् पुरञ्जन्यां पुरञ्जन: । शतान्येकादश विराडायुषोऽर्धमथात्यगात् ॥ ६ ॥
tasyām ajanayat putrān
[tasyaam ajanayat putraan]
purañjanyāṁ purañjanaḥ
[puranjanyaam puranjanah]
śatāny ekādaśa virāḍ
[shataany ekaadasha viraad]
āyuṣo ’rdham athātyagāt
[aayusho ’rdham athaatyagaat]
tasyām — within her ajanayat — he begot putrān — sons purañjanyām — in Purañjanī purañjanaḥ — King Purañjana śatāni — hundreds ekādaśa — eleven virāṭ — O King āyuṣaḥ — of life ardham — half atha — in this way atyagāt — he passed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyām ajanayat putrān
tasyām
within her
ajanayat
he begot
putrān
sons
purañjanyāṁ purañjanaḥ
purañjanyām
in Purañjanī
purañjanaḥ
King Purañjana
śatāny ekādaśa virāḍ
śatāni
hundreds
ekādaśa
eleven
virāṭ
O King
āyuṣo ’rdham athātyagāt
āyuṣaḥ
of life
ardham
half
atha
in this way
atyagāt
he passed.
The great sage Nārada then addressed King Prācīnabarhiṣat: O one whose life span is great [virāṭ], in this way King Purañjana begot 1,100 sons within the womb of his wife, Purañjanī. However, in this business he passed away half of his life span.

In this verse there are several significant words, the first of which are ekādaśa śatāni. Purañjana had begotten 1,100 sons within the womb of his wife and thus passed away half of his life. Actually every man follows a similar process. If one lives for one hundred years at the utmost, in his family life he simply begets children up to the age of fifty. Unfortunately at the present moment people do not live even a hundred years; nonetheless they beget children up to the age of sixty. Another point is that formerly people used to beget one hundred to two hundred sons and daughters. As will be evident from the next verse, King Purañjana not only begot 1,100 sons but also 110 daughters. At the present moment no one can produce such huge quantities of children. Instead, mankind is very busy checking the increase of population by contraceptive methods.

We do not find in Vedic literatures that they ever used contraceptive methods, although they were begetting hundreds of children. Checking population by contraceptive method is another sinful activity, but in this Age of Kali people have become so sinful that they do not care for the resultant reactions of their sinful lives. King Purañjana lay down with his wife, Purañjanī, and begot a large number of children, and there is no mention in these verses that he used contraceptive methods. According to the Vedic scriptures the contraceptive method should be restraint in sex life. It is not that one should indulge in unrestricted sex life and avoid children by using some method to check pregnancy. If a man is in good consciousness, he consults with his religious wife, and as a result of this consultation, with intelligence, one advances in his ability to estimate the value of life. In other words, if one is fortunate enough to have a good, conscientious wife, he can decide by mutual consultation that human life is meant for advancing in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and not for begetting a large number of children. Children are called pariṇāma, or by-products, and when one consults his good intelligence he can see that his by-products should be the expansion of his Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Purañjana bore a hundred and eleven sons in his wife. In this way half his life passed. Virāṭ is the king or the jīva. He passed fifty years in sex life and material enjoyment.
He begot 1,100 sons in her womb and half his lifespan passed. Productive reproduction can still consume the lifespan without spiritual fruit; numbers aren't the same as growth.
Reflection Questions
  • What 1,100 'sons' (projects, outputs) have I produced that haven't moved me toward the spiritual destination?
  • Where would I trade quantity of output for quality of direction?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.7

↗
दुहितृर्दशोत्तरशतं पितृमातृयशस्करी: । शीलौदार्यगुणोपेता: पौरञ्जन्य: प्रजापते ॥ ७ ॥
duhitṝr daśottara-śataṁ
[duhitreer dashottara-shatam]
pitṛ-mātṛ-yaśaskarīḥ
[pitri-maatri-yashaskareeh]
śīlaudārya-guṇopetāḥ
[sheelaudaarya-gunopetaah]
paurañjanyaḥ prajā-pate
[pauranjanyah prajaa-pate]
duhitṝḥ — daughters daśa-uttara — ten more than śatam — one hundred pitṛ — like the father mātṛ — and mother yaśaskarīḥ — glorified śīla — good behavior audārya — magnanimity guṇa — good qualities upetāḥ — possessed of paurañjanyaḥ — daughters of Purañjana prajā-pate — O Prajāpati.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
duhitṝr daśottara-śataṁ
duhitṝḥ
daughters
daśa-uttara
ten more than
śatam
one hundred
pitṛ-mātṛ-yaśaskarīḥ
pitṛ
like the father
mātṛ
and mother
yaśaskarīḥ
glorified
śīlaudārya-guṇopetāḥ
śīla
good behavior
audārya
magnanimity
guṇa
good qualities
upetāḥ
possessed of
paurañjanyaḥ prajā-pate
paurañjanyaḥ
daughters of Purañjana
prajā-pate
O Prajāpati.
O Prajāpati, King Prācīnabarhiṣat, in this way King Purañjana also begot 110 daughters. All of these were equally glorified like the father and mother. Their behavior was gentle, and they possessed magnanimity and other good qualities.

Children begotten under the rules and regulations of the scriptures generally become as good as the father and mother, but children born illegitimately mainly become varṇa-saṅkara. The varṇa-saṅkara population is irresponsible to the family, community and even to themselves. Formerly the varṇa-saṅkara population was checked by the observation of the reformatory method called garbhādhāna-saṁskāra, a child-begetting religious ceremony. In this verse we find that although King Purañjana had begotten so many children, they were not varṇa-saṅkara. All of them were good, well-behaved children, and they had good qualities like their father and mother.

Even though we may produce many good children, our desire for sex that is beyond the prescribed method is to be considered sinful. Too much enjoyment of any of the senses (not only sex) results in sinful activities. Therefore one has to become a svāmī or gosvāmī at the end of his life. One may beget children up to the age of fifty, but after fifty one must stop begetting children and should accept the vānaprastha order. In this way he must leave home and then become a sannyāsī. A sannyāsī’s title is svāmī or gosvāmī, which means that he completely refrains from sense enjoyment. One should not accept the sannyāsa order whimsically; he must be fully confident that he can restrain his desires for sense gratification. King Purañjana’s family life was, of course, very happy. As mentioned in these verses, he begot 1,100 sons and 110 daughters. Everyone desires to have more sons than daughters, and since the number of daughters was less than the number of sons, it appears that King Purañjana’s family life was very comfortable and pleasing.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Prajāpati! He begot a hundred and ten daughters. They were generous, full of good qualities and behavior, giving fame to their father and mother. He had daughters like shame, enthusiasm and thoughtfulness. The number of sons was more, because it is considered proper in household life to have more sons. The daughters had good qualities because of their previous pious acts. Because they were his daughters, they were called paurañjanyaḥ.
He also begot 110 daughters, equally gentle and magnanimous. Rules-following yields children who resemble the parents — culture passes intact when conducted properly.
Reflection Questions
  • What culture am I passing to whatever (or whomever) I'm producing?
  • Where do my outputs resemble me more than I'd like, and what would I change?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.8

↗
स पञ्चालपति: पुत्रान् पितृवंशविवर्धनान् । दारै: संयोजयामास दुहितृ: सद‍ृशैर्वरै: ॥ ८ ॥
sa pañcāla-patiḥ putrān
[sa panchaala-patih putraan]
pitṛ-vaṁśa-vivardhanān
[pitri-vamsha-vivardhanaan]
dāraiḥ saṁyojayām āsa
[daaraih samyojayaam aasa]
duhitṝḥ sadṛśair varaiḥ
[duhitreeh sadrishair varaih]
saḥ — he pañcāla-patiḥ — the King of Pañcāla putrān — sons pitṛ-vaṁśa — paternal family vivardhanān — increasing dāraiḥ — with wives saṁyojayām āsa — married duhitṝḥ — daughters sadṛśaiḥ — qualified varaiḥ — with husbands.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa pañcāla-patiḥ putrān
saḥ
he
pañcāla-patiḥ
the King of Pañcāla
putrān
sons
pitṛ-vaṁśa-vivardhanān
pitṛ-vaṁśa
paternal family
vivardhanān
increasing
dāraiḥ saṁyojayām āsa
dāraiḥ
with wives
saṁyojayām āsa
married
duhitṝḥ sadṛśair varaiḥ
duhitṝḥ
daughters
sadṛśaiḥ
qualified
varaiḥ
with husbands.
After this, King Purañjana, King of the Pañcāla country, in order to increase the descendants of his paternal family, married his sons with qualified wives and married his daughters with qualified husbands.

According to the Vedic system, everyone should marry. One has to accept a wife because a wife will produce children, and the children in their turn will offer foodstuffs and funeral ceremonies so that the forefathers, wherever they may live, will be made happy. The offering of oblations in the name of Lord Viṣṇu is called piṇḍodaka, and it is necessary that the descendants of a family offer piṇḍa to the forefathers.

Not only was Purañjana, the King of Pañcāla, satisfied in his own sex life, but he arranged for the sex life of his 1,100 sons and 110 daughters. In this way one can elevate an aristocratic family to the platform of a dynasty. It is significant in this verse that Purañjana got both sons and daughters married. It is the duty of a father and mother to arrange for the marriage of their sons and daughters. That is the obligation in Vedic society. Sons and daughters should not be allowed freedom to intermingle with the opposite sex unless they are married. This Vedic social organization is very good in that it stops the promulgation of illicit sex life, or varṇa-saṅkara, which appears under different names in this present day. Unfortunately, in this age, although the father and mother are anxious to get their children married, the children refuse to get married by the arrangement of the parents. Consequently, the number of varṇa-saṅkara has increased throughout the world under different names.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Purañjana, lord of Pañcāla, in order to increase the descendants of his paternal family, got his sons married with wives and got his daughters married with husbands. The wives were consideration, determination etc. The grooms were humility, affection etc.
He married off his children to qualified spouses to increase his lineage. Increasing the paternal line is one mode of householder dharma; recognize it and limit it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse expansion of my projects with their actual quality?
  • What 'qualified spouse' have I been finding for my outputs, and is that the right framing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.9

↗
पुत्राणां चाभवन्पुत्रा एकैकस्य शतं शतम् । यैर्वै पौरञ्जनो वंश: पञ्चालेषु समेधित: ॥ ९ ॥
putrāṇāṁ cābhavan putrā
[putraanaam chaabhavan putraa]
ekaikasya śataṁ śatam
[ekaikasya shatam shatam]
yair vai paurañjano vaṁśaḥ
[yair vai pauranjano vamshah]
pañcāleṣu samedhitaḥ
[panchaaleshu samedhitah]
putrāṇām — of the sons ca — also abhavan — were produced putrāḥ — sons eka-ekasya — of each one śatam — hundred śatam — hundred yaiḥ — by whom vai — certainly paurañjanaḥ — of King Purañjana vaṁśaḥ — family pañcāleṣu — in the land of Pañcāla samedhitaḥ — greatly increased.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
putrāṇāṁ cābhavan putrā
putrāṇām
of the sons
ca
also
abhavan
were produced
putrāḥ
sons
ekaikasya śataṁ śatam
eka-ekasya
of each one
śatam
hundred
śatam
hundred
yair vai paurañjano vaṁśaḥ
yaiḥ
by whom
vai
certainly
paurañjanaḥ
of King Purañjana
vaṁśaḥ
family
pañcāleṣu samedhitaḥ
pañcāleṣu
in the land of Pañcāla
samedhitaḥ
greatly increased.
Of these many sons, each produced hundreds and hundreds of grandsons. In this way the whole city of Pañcāla became overcrowded by these sons and grandsons of King Purañjana.

We must remember that Purañjana is the living entity, and the city Pañcāla is the body. The body is the field of activity for the living entity, as stated in Bhagavad-gītā: kṣetra-kṣetrajña. There are two constituents: one is the living entity ( kṣetra-jña ), and the other is the body of the living entity ( kṣetra ). Any living entity can know that he is covered by the body if he only contemplates the body a little bit. Just with a little contemplation he can come to understand that the body is his possession. One can understand this by practical experience and by the authority of the śāstras. In Bhagavad-gītā (2.13) it is said, dehino ’smin yathā dehe: the proprietor of the body, the soul, is within the body. The body is taken as the pañcāla-deśa, or the field of activities wherein the living entity can enjoy the senses in their relationship to the five sense objects, namely gandha, rasa, rūpa, sparśa and śabda — that is, sense objects made out of earth, water, fire, air and sky. Within this material world, covered by the material body of subtle and gross matter, every living entity creates actions and reactions, which are herein known allegorically as sons and grandsons. There are two kinds of actions and reactions — namely pious and impious. In this way our material existence becomes coated by different actions and reactions. In this regard, Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura states:

karma-kāṇḍa, jñāna-kāṇḍa, kevala viṣera bhāṇḍa, amṛta baliyā yebā khāya nānā yoni sadā phire, kadarya bhakṣaṇa kare, tāra janma adhaḥ-pāte yāya

“Fruitive activities and mental speculation are simply cups of poison. Whoever drinks of them, thinking them to be nectar, must struggle very hard life after life, in different types of bodies. Such a person eats all kinds of nonsense and becomes condemned by his activities of so-called sense enjoyment.”

Thus the field of action and reactions, by which one’s descendants are increased, begins with sex life. Purañjana increased his whole family by begetting sons who in their turn begot grandsons. Thus the living entity, being inclined toward sexual gratification, becomes involved in many hundreds and thousands of actions and reactions. In this way he remains within the material world simply for the purpose of sense gratification and transmigrates from one body to another. His process of reproducing so many sons and grandsons results in so-called societies, nations, communities and so on. All these communities, societies, dynasties and nations simply expand from sex life. As stated by Prahlāda Mahārāja, yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham ( Bhāg. 7.9.45 ). A gṛhamedhī is one who wants to remain within this material existence. This means that he wants to remain within this body or society and enjoy friendship, love and community. His only enjoyment is in increasing the number of sex enjoyers. He enjoys sex and produces children, who in their turn marry and produce grandchildren. The grandchildren also marry and in their turn produce great-grandchildren. In this way the entire earth becomes overpopulated, and then suddenly there are reactions provoked by material nature in the form of war, famine, pestilence, earthquakes, etc. Thus the entire population is again extinguished simply to be re-created. This process is explained in Bhagavad-gītā (8.19) as repeated creation and annihilation: bhūtvā bhūtvā pralīyate. Due to a lack of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, all this creation and annihilation is going on under the name of human civilization. This cycle continues due to man’s lack of knowledge of the soul and the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Each son produced a hundred and one sons, by whom the dynasty of Purañjana increased in the Pañcāla states. The sons of the sons were pious acts etc. Pañcāla refers to the sense objects such as sound.
Related verses
Each son produced hundreds of grandsons; the city of Pañcāla became overcrowded. Successful reproduction crowds the body-city; descendants multiply faster than the founder can attend to.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my own 'body-city' overcrowded with descendants of past projects?
  • What pruning would restore livability?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.10

↗
तेषु तद्रिक्थहारेषु गृहकोशानुजीविषु । निरूढेन ममत्वेन विषयेष्वन्वबध्यत ॥ १० ॥
teṣu tad-riktha-hāreṣu
[teshu tad-riktha-haareshu]
gṛha-kośānujīviṣu
[griha-koshaanujeevishu]
nirūḍhena mamatvena
[niroodhena mamatvena]
viṣayeṣv anvabadhyata
[vishayeshv anvabadhyata]
teṣu — to them tat-riktha-hāreṣu — the plunderers of his money gṛha — home kośa — treasury anujīviṣu — to the followers nirūḍhena — deep-rooted mamatvena — by attachment viṣayeṣu — to sense objects anvabadhyata — became bound.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
teṣu tad-riktha-hāreṣu
teṣu
to them
tat-riktha-hāreṣu
the plunderers of his money
gṛha-kośānujīviṣu
gṛha
home
kośa
treasury
anujīviṣu
to the followers
nirūḍhena mamatvena
nirūḍhena
deep-rooted
mamatvena
by attachment
viṣayeṣv anvabadhyata
viṣayeṣu
to sense objects
anvabadhyata
became bound.
These sons and grandsons were virtually plunderers of King Purañjana’s riches, including his home, treasury, servants, secretaries and all other paraphernalia. Purañjana’s attachment for these things was very deep-rooted.

In this verse the word riktha-hāreṣu, meaning “plunderers of wealth,” is very significant. One’s sons, grandsons and other descendants are ultimately plunderers of one’s accumulated wealth. There are many celebrated businessmen and industrialists who produce great wealth and are highly praised by the public, but all their money is ultimately plundered by their sons and grandsons. In India we have actually seen one industrialist who, like King Purañjana, was very much sexually inclined and had a half dozen wives. Each of these wives had a separate establishment that necessitated the expenditure of several thousands of rupees. When I was engaged in talking with him, I saw that he was very busy trying to secure money so that all his sons and daughters would get at least five hundred thousand rupees each. Thus such industrialists, businessmen or karmīs are called mūḍhas in the śāstras. They work very hard, accumulate money, and are satisfied to see that this money is plundered by their sons and grandsons. Such people do not want to return their wealth to its actual owner. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (5.29) , bhoktāraṁ yajña-tapasāṁ sarva-loka-maheśvaram: the real proprietor of all wealth is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He is the actual enjoyer. So-called earners of money are those who simply know tricks by which they can take away God’s money under the guise of business and industry. After accumulating this money, they enjoy seeing it plundered by their sons and grandsons. This is the materialistic way of life. In materialistic life one is encaged within the body and deluded by false egoism. Thus one thinks, “I am this body,” “I am a human being,” “I am an American,” “I am an Indian.” This bodily conception is due to false ego. Being deluded by false ego, one identifies himself with a certain family, nation or community. In this way one’s attachment for the material world grows deeper and deeper. Thus it becomes very difficult for the living entity to extricate himself from his entanglement. Such people are graphically described in the Sixteenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā (16.13-15) in this way:

idam adya mayā labdham imaṁ prāpsye manoratham idam astīdam api me bhaviṣyati punar dhanam

asau mayā hataḥ śatrur haniṣye cāparān api īśvaro ’ham ahaṁ bhogī siddho ’haṁ balavān sukhī

āḍhyo ’bhijanavān asmi ko ’nyo ’sti sadṛśo mayā yakṣye dāsyāmi modiṣya ity ajñāna-vimohitāḥ

“The demoniac person thinks: ‘So much wealth do I have today, and I will gain more according to my schemes. So much is mine now, and it will increase in the future, more and more. He is my enemy, and I have killed him; and my other enemy will also be killed. I am the lord of everything, I am the enjoyer, I am perfect, powerful and happy. I am the richest man, surrounded by aristocratic relatives. There is none so powerful and happy as I am. I shall perform sacrifices, I shall give some charity, and thus I shall rejoice.’ In this way, such persons are deluded by ignorance.”

In this way people engage in various laborious activities, and their attachment for body, home, family, nation and community becomes more and more deep-rooted.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He became attached to enjoyment, retinue, treasury, house and his plundering sons because of deep-rooted possessiveness. He became attached to sons such as discrimination, who stole his treasure of pride, to his life airs (gṛha anujīviṣu) and his strength of mind and senses (koṣa anujīviṣu).
His sons and grandsons plundered his riches, home, treasury, servants — yet his attachment was deep. Even when they plunder you, you remain attached; the bond of family wealth is hard to see clearly while you're inside it.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my descendants — literal or metaphorical — are plundering me while I rationalize it?
  • Where is attachment blinding me to a clearly-visible plundering?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.11

↗
ईजे च क्रतुभिर्घोरैर्दीक्षित: पशुमारकै: । देवान् पितृन् भूतपतीन्नानाकामो यथा भवान् ॥ ११ ॥
īje ca kratubhir ghorair
[eeje cha kratubhir ghorair]
dīkṣitaḥ paśu-mārakaiḥ
[deekshitah pashu-maarakaih]
devān pitṝn bhūta-patīn
[devaan pitreen bhoota-pateen]
nānā-kāmo yathā bhavān
[naanaa-kaamo yathaa bhavaan]
īje — he worshiped ca — also kratubhiḥ — by sacrifices ghoraiḥ — ghastly dīkṣitaḥ — inspired paśu-mārakaiḥ — wherein poor animals are killed devān — the demigods pitṝn — forefathers bhūta-patīn — great leaders of human society nānā — various kāmaḥ — having desires yathā — like bhavān — you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
īje ca kratubhir ghorair
īje
he worshiped
ca
also
kratubhiḥ
by sacrifices
ghoraiḥ
ghastly
dīkṣitaḥ paśu-mārakaiḥ
dīkṣitaḥ
inspired
paśu-mārakaiḥ
wherein poor animals are killed
devān pitṝn bhūta-patīn
devān
the demigods
pitṝn
forefathers
bhūta-patīn
great leaders of human society
nānā-kāmo yathā bhavān
nānā
various
kāmaḥ
having desires
yathā
like
bhavān
you.
The great sage Nārada continued: My dear King Prācīnabarhiṣat, like you King Purañjana also became implicated in so many desires. Thus he worshiped demigods, forefathers and social leaders with various sacrifices which were all very ghastly because they were inspired by the desire to kill animals.

In this verse the great sage Nārada discloses that the character of Purañjana was being described to give lessons to King Prācīnabarhiṣat. Actually the entire description was figuratively describing the activities of King Prācīnabarhiṣat. In this verse Nārada frankly says “like you” ( yathā bhavān ), which indicates that King Purañjana is none other than King Prācīnabarhiṣat himself. Being a great Vaiṣṇava, Nārada Muni wanted to stop animal-killing in sacrifices. He knew that if he tried to stop the King from performing sacrifices, the King would not hear him. Therefore he is describing the life of Purañjana. But in this verse he first discloses the intention, although not fully, by saying “like you.” Generally the karmīs, who are attached to increasing descendants, have to perform so many sacrifices and worship so many demigods for future generations and satisfy so many leaders, politicians, philosophers and scientists to make things go on properly for future generations. The so-called scientists are very eager to see that future generations will live very comfortably, and as such they are trying to find different means of generating energy to drive locomotives, cars, airplanes and so on. Now they are exhausting the petroleum supply. These activities are described in the Bhagavad-gītā (2.41) :

vyavasāyātmikā buddhir ekeha kuru-nandana bahu-śākhā hy anantāś ca buddhayo ’vyavasāyinām

“Those who are on the spiritual path are resolute in purpose, and their aim is one. O beloved child of the Kurus, the intelligence of those who are irresolute is many-branched.”

Actually, those who are in knowledge of everything are determined to execute Kṛṣṇa consciousness, but those who are rascals ( mūḍhāḥ ), sinners ( duṣkṛtinaḥ ) and the lowest of mankind ( narādhamāḥ ), who are bereft of all intelligence ( māyayāpahṛta jñānāḥ ) and who take shelter of the demoniac way of life ( āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ ), are disinterested in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. As such they become implicated and take on so many activities. Most of these activities center around the killing of animals. Modern civilization is centered around animal-killing. Karmīs are advertising that without eating meat, their vitamin value or vitality will be reduced; so to keep oneself fit to work hard, one must eat meat, and to digest meat, one must drink liquor, and to keep the balance of drinking wine and eating meat, one must have sufficient sexual intercourse to keep fit to work very hard like an ass.

There are two ways of animal-killing. One way is in the name of religious sacrifices. All the religions of the world — except the Buddhists — have a program for killing animals in places of worship. According to Vedic civilization, the animal-eaters are recommended to sacrifice a goat in the temple of Kālī under certain restrictive rules and regulations and eat the flesh. Similarly, they are recommended to drink wine by worshiping the goddess Caṇḍikā. The purpose is restriction. People have given up all this restriction. Now they are regularly opening wine distilleries and slaughterhouses and indulging in drinking alcohol and eating flesh. A Vaiṣṇava ācārya like Nārada Muni knows very well that persons engaged in such animal-killing in the name of religion are certainly becoming involved in the cycle of birth and death, forgetting the real aim of life: to go home, back to Godhead.

Thus the great sage Nārada, while instructing Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam to Vyāsa Muni, condemned the karma-kāṇḍa (fruitive) activities mentioned in the Vedas. Nārada told Vyāsa:

jugupsitaṁ dharma-kṛte ’nuśāsataḥ svabhāva-raktasya mahān vyatikramaḥ yad vākyato dharma itītaraḥ sthito na manyate tasya nivāraṇaṁ janaḥ

“The people in general are naturally inclined to enjoy, and you have encouraged them in that way in the name of religion. This is verily condemned and is quite unreasonable. Because they are guided under your instructions, they will accept such activities in the name of religion and will hardly care for prohibitions.” ( Bhāg. 1.5.15 )

Śrīla Nārada Muni chastised Vyāsadeva for compiling so many Vedic supplementary scriptures, which are all intended for guiding the people in general. Nārada Muni condemned these scriptures because they do not mention direct devotional service. Under Nārada’s instructions, direct worship of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as described in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, was set forth by Vyāsadeva. The conclusion is that neither the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, nor His devotee ever sanctions animal-killing in the name of religion. Indeed, Kṛṣṇa incarnated Himself as Lord Buddha to put an end to animal-killing in the name of religion. Animal sacrifice under the name of religion is conducted by the influence of tamo-guṇa (the mode of ignorance), as indicated in the Eighteenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā (18.31-32):

yayā dharmam adharmaṁ ca kāryaṁ cākāryam eva ca ayathāvat prajānāti buddhiḥ sā pārtha rājasī

adharmaṁ dharmam iti yā manyate tamasāvṛtā sarvārthān viparītāṁś ca buddhiḥ sā pārtha tāmasī

“That understanding which cannot distinguish between the religious way of life and the irreligious, between action that should be done and action that should not be done — that imperfect understanding, O son of Pṛthā, is in the mode of passion. That understanding which considers irreligion to be religion and religion to be irreligion, under the spell of illusion and darkness, and strives always in the wrong direction, O Pārtha, is in the mode of ignorance.”

Those who are involved in the mode of ignorance manufacture religious systems for killing animals. Actually dharma is transcendental. As Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa teaches, we must give up all other systems of religion and simply surrender unto Him ( sarva-dharmān parityajya ). Thus the Lord and His devotees and representatives teach the transcendental dharma, which does not allow animal-killing at all. At the present moment it is the greatest misfortune that in India many so-called missionary workers are spreading irreligion in the name of religion. They claim an ordinary human being to be God and recommend meat-eating for everyone, including so-called sannyāsīs.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having many desires, he worshipped the devatās, Pitṛs, leaders of ghosts, using violent sacrifices with animal slaughter, just like you. There is only one meaning here. I am telling a story about you. I have hidden the meaning only to make an example of you.
Related verses
Like you, he worshiped demigods, ancestors and leaders with sacrifices that were ghastly because they involved animal-killing. The figural tale is now revealed as autobiography; you, Prācīnabarhi, are Purañjana.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in the parables I read am I avoiding the recognition that they're about me?
  • What would 'I am Purañjana' shift in my reading of this story?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.12

↗
युक्तेष्वेवं प्रमत्तस्य कुटुम्बासक्तचेतस: । आससाद स वै कालो योऽप्रिय: प्रिययोषिताम् ॥ १२ ॥
yukteṣv evaṁ pramattasya
[yukteshv evam pramattasya]
kuṭumbāsakta-cetasaḥ
[kutumbaasakta-chetasah]
āsasāda sa vai kālo
[aasasaada sa vai kaalo]
yo ’priyaḥ priya-yoṣitām
[yo ’priyah priya-yoshitaam]
yukteṣu — to beneficial activities evam — thus pramattasya — being inattentive kuṭumba — to kith and kin āsakta — attached cetasaḥ — consciousness āsasāda — arrived saḥ — that vai — certainly kālaḥ — time yaḥ — which apriyaḥ — not very pleasing priya-yoṣitām — for persons attached to women.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yukteṣv evaṁ pramattasya
yukteṣu
to beneficial activities
evam
thus
pramattasya
being inattentive
kuṭumbāsakta-cetasaḥ
kuṭumba
to kith and kin
āsakta
attached
cetasaḥ
consciousness
āsasāda sa vai kālo
āsasāda
arrived
saḥ
that
vai
certainly
kālaḥ
time
yo ’priyaḥ priya-yoṣitām
yaḥ
which
apriyaḥ
not very pleasing
priya-yoṣitām
for persons attached to women.
Thus King Purañjana, being attached to fruitive activities [karma-kāṇḍīya] as well as kith and kin, and being obsessed with polluted consciousness, eventually arrived at that point not very much liked by those who are overly attached to material things.

In this verse the words priya-yoṣitām and apriyaḥ are very significant. The word yoṣit means “woman,” and priya means “dear” or “pleasing.” Death is not very much welcome for those who are too much attached to material enjoyment, which culminates in sex. There is an instructive story in this connection: Once when a saintly person was passing on his way, he met a prince, the son of a king, and he blessed him, saying, “My dear prince, may you live forever.” The sage next met a saintly person and said to him, “You may either live or die.” Eventually the sage met a brahmacārī devotee, and he blessed him, saying, “My dear devotee, you may die immediately.” Finally the sage met a hunter, and he blessed him, saying, “Neither live nor die.” The point is that those who are very sensual and are engaged in sense gratification do not wish to die. Generally a prince has enough money to enjoy his senses; therefore the great sage said that he should live forever, for as long as he lived he could enjoy life, but after his death he would go to hell. Since the brahmacārī devotee was leading a life of severe austerities and penances in order to be promoted back to Godhead, the sage said that he should die immediately so that he need not continue to labor hard and could instead go back home, back to Godhead. A saintly person may either live or die, for during his life he is engaged in serving the Lord and after his death he also serves the Lord. Thus this life and the next are the same for a saintly devotee, for in both he serves the Lord. Since the hunter lives a very ghastly life due to killing animals, and since he will go to hell when he dies, he is advised to neither live nor die.

King Purañjana finally arrived at the point of old age. In old age the senses lose their strength, and although an old man desires to enjoy his senses, and especially sex life, he is very miserable because his instruments of enjoyment no longer function. Such sensualists are never prepared for death. They simply want to live on and on and extend their life by so-called scientific advancement. Some foolish Russian scientists also claim that they are going to make man immortal through scientific advancement. Under the leadership of such crazy fellows, civilization is going on. Cruel death, however, comes and takes all of them away despite their desire to live forever. This type of mentality was exhibited by Hiraṇyakaśipu, but when the time was ripe, the Lord personally killed him within a second.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Inattentive to beneficial acts and absorbed in family life, he reached old age, which is disliked by the women. He was inattentive to things beneficial for him, like bhakti and detachment. Kālaḥ means old age. It is disliked by the women, since it is unfavorable for enjoyment.
Attached to fruitive activity and family, polluted in consciousness, he reached the point women don't like to think about — death. Materialism cycles directly into death; the more it succeeds, the closer the unwelcome conclusion.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I refuse to think about death because it would interrupt my present absorption?
  • Whose absorption around me is heading toward exactly the conclusion it doesn't want to face?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.13

↗
चण्डवेग इति ख्यातो गन्धर्वाधिपतिर्नृप । गन्धर्वास्तस्य बलिन: षष्ट्युत्तरशतत्रयम् ॥ १३ ॥
caṇḍavega iti khyāto
[chandavega iti khyaato]
gandharvādhipatir nṛpa
[gandharvaadhipatir nripa]
gandharvās tasya balinaḥ
[gandharvaas tasya balinah]
ṣaṣṭy-uttara-śata-trayam
[shashty-uttara-shata-trayam]
caṇḍavegaḥ — Caṇḍavega iti — thus khyātaḥ — celebrated gandharva — belonging to the Gandharvaloka adhipatiḥ — king nṛpa — O King gandharvāḥ — other Gandharvas tasya — his balinaḥ — very powerful soldiers ṣaṣṭi — sixty uttara — surpassing śata — hundred trayam — three.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
caṇḍavega iti khyāto
caṇḍavegaḥ
Caṇḍavega
iti
thus
khyātaḥ
celebrated
gandharvādhipatir nṛpa
gandharva
belonging to the Gandharvaloka
adhipatiḥ
king
nṛpa
O King
gandharvās tasya balinaḥ
gandharvāḥ
other Gandharvas
tasya
his
balinaḥ
very powerful soldiers
ṣaṣṭy-uttara-śata-trayam
ṣaṣṭi
sixty
uttara
surpassing
śata
hundred
trayam
three.
O King! In Gandharvaloka there is a king named Caṇḍavega. Under him there are 360 very powerful Gandharva soldiers.

Time is figuratively described here as Caṇḍavega. Since time and tide wait for no man, time is herein called Caṇḍavega, which means “very swiftly passing away.” As time passes, it is calculated in terms of years. One year contains 360 days, and the soldiers of Caṇḍavega herein mentioned represent these days. Time passes swiftly; Caṇḍavega’s powerful soldiers of Gandharvaloka very swiftly carry away all the days of our life. As the sun rises and sets, it snatches away the balance of our life span. Thus as each day passes, each one of us loses some of life’s duration. It is therefore said that the duration of one’s life cannot be saved. But if one is engaged in devotional service, his time cannot be taken away by the sun. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (2.3.17) , āyur harati vai puṁsām udyann astaṁ ca yann asau. The conclusion is that if one wants to make himself immortal, he should give up sense gratification. By engaging oneself in devotional service, one can gradually enter into the eternal kingdom of God.

Mirages and other illusory things are sometimes called Gandharvas. Our losing our life span is taken as advancement of age. This imperceptible passing away of the days of life is figuratively referred to in this verse as Gandharvas. As explained in later verses, such Gandharvas are both male and female. This indicates that both men and women lose their life span imperceptibly by the force of time, which is herein described as Caṇḍavega.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Caṇḍavega, King of the Gandharvas and his 360 powerful Gandharva soldiers, paired with female Gandharvas, some of whom were white and some of whom were black, circled the city built to fulfill all desires and plundered it. Caṇḍavega (moving strongly), which is the year, was the leader of the Gandharvas. The Gandharvas are days. The women Gandharvas are the nights. They were paired with the days. The white ones were the waxing phase of the moon, and the black one were the waning phase of the moon. They circled around the city and plundered it. This indicates that from birth, every day the life span is stolen by time.
In Gandharvaloka there's King Caṇḍavega ('swiftly passing') with 360 Gandharva soldiers. Time itself is the king; the days are his army; you live inside his campaign.
Reflection Questions
  • How often do I picture time itself as an active general advancing against my city?
  • Where would naming Caṇḍavega change my relationship with my daily calendar?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.14

↗
गन्धर्व्यस्ताद‍ृशीरस्य मैथुन्यश्च सितासिता: । परिवृत्त्या विलुम्पन्ति सर्वकामविनिर्मिताम् ॥ १४ ॥
gandharvyas tādṛśīr asya
[gandharvyas taadrisheer asya]
maithunyaś ca sitāsitāḥ
[maithunyash cha sitaasitaah]
parivṛttyā vilumpanti
[parivrittyaa vilumpanti]
sarva-kāma-vinirmitām
[sarva-kaama-vinirmitaam]
gandharvyaḥ — Gandharvīs tādṛśīḥ — similarly asya — of Caṇḍavega maithunyaḥ — companions for sexual intercourse ca — also sita — white asitāḥ — black parivṛttyā — by surrounding vilumpanti — they plundered sarva-kāma — all kinds of desirable objects vinirmitām — manufactured.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gandharvyas tādṛśīr asya
gandharvyaḥ
Gandharvīs
tādṛśīḥ
similarly
asya
of Caṇḍavega
maithunyaś ca sitāsitāḥ
maithunyaḥ
companions for sexual intercourse
ca
also
sita
white
asitāḥ
black
parivṛttyā vilumpanti
parivṛttyā
by surrounding
vilumpanti
they plundered
sarva-kāma-vinirmitām
sarva-kāma
all kinds of desirable objects
vinirmitām
manufactured.
Along with Caṇḍavega were as many female Gandharvīs as there were soldiers, and all of them repetitively plundered all the paraphernalia for sense enjoyment.

The days have been compared to the soldiers of Caṇḍavega. Night is generally a time for sex enjoyment. Days are considered to be white, and nights are considered to be black, or, from another point of view, there are two kinds of nights — black nights and white nights. All these days and nights combine to pass away our span of life and everything we manufacture for sense gratification. Material activity means manufacturing things for sense gratification. Scientists are conducting research to find out how we can satisfy our senses more and more elaborately. In this Kali-yuga, the demoniac mentality is employed in manufacturing various machines to facilitate the process of sense gratification. There are so many machines for ordinary household activities. There are machines for washing dishes, cleansing the floor, shaving, clipping hair — today everything is done by machine. All these facilities for sense gratification are described in this verse as sarva-kāma-vinirmitām. The time factor, however, is so strong that not only is our span of life being expended, but all the machines and facilities for sense gratification are deteriorating. Therefore in this verse the word vilumpanti, “plundering,” is used. Everything is being plundered from the very beginning of our lives.

This plundering of our possessions and life span begins with the day of our birth. One day will come when death will finish everything, and the living entity will have to enter another body to begin another chapter of life and again begin the cycle of material sense gratification. Prahlāda Mahārāja describes this process as punaḥ punaś carvita-carvaṇānām ( Bhāg. 7.5.30 ): materialistic life means chewing the chewed again and again. The central point of material life is sense gratification. In different types of bodies, the living entity enjoys various senses, and through creating various types of facilities, he chews the chewed. Whether we squeeze sugar out of the sugarcane with our teeth or a machine, the result is the same — sugarcane juice. We may discover many ways to squeeze the juice out of the sugarcane, but the result is the same.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Caṇḍavega, King of the Gandharvas and his 360 powerful Gandharva soldiers, paired with female Gandharvas, some of whom were white and some of whom were black, circled the city built to fulfill all desires and plundered it. Caṇḍavega (moving strongly), which is the year, was the leader of the Gandharvas. The Gandharvas are days. The women Gandharvas are the nights. They were paired with the days. The white ones were the waxing phase of the moon, and the black one were the waning phase of the moon. They circled around the city and plundered it. This indicates that from birth, every day the life span is stolen by time.
Related verses
Equal number of female Gandharvīs accompany, repetitively plundering sense-paraphernalia. 360 days, 360 nights — each pair plunders what you've built; the design is total, not random.
Reflection Questions
  • What does it mean that nights and days are equally engaged in plunder?
  • Where do I treat night as recovery when it's also part of the campaign against me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.15

↗
ते चण्डवेगानुचरा: पुरञ्जनपुरं यदा । हर्तुमारेभिरे तत्र प्रत्यषेधत्प्रजागर: ॥ १५ ॥
te caṇḍavegānucarāḥ
[te chandavegaanucharaah]
purañjana-puraṁ yadā
[puranjana-puram yadaa]
hartum ārebhire tatra
[hartum aarebhire tatra]
pratyaṣedhat prajāgaraḥ
[pratyashedhat prajaagarah]
te — all of them caṇḍavega — of Caṇḍavega anucarāḥ — followers purañjana — of King Purañjana puram — city yadā — when hartum — to plunder ārebhire — began tatra — there pratyaṣedhat — defended prajāgaraḥ — the big serpent.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te caṇḍavegānucarāḥ
te
all of them
caṇḍavega
of Caṇḍavega
anucarāḥ
followers
purañjana-puraṁ yadā
purañjana
of King Purañjana
puram
city
yadā
when
hartum ārebhire tatra
hartum
to plunder
ārebhire
began
tatra
there
pratyaṣedhat prajāgaraḥ
pratyaṣedhat
defended
prajāgaraḥ
the big serpent.
When King Gandharva-rāja [Caṇḍavega] and his followers began to plunder the city of Purañjana, a snake with five hoods began to defend the city.

When one is sleeping, the life air remains active in different dreams. The five hoods of the snake indicate that the life air is surrounded by five kinds of air, known as prāṇa, apāna, vyāna, udāna and samāna. When the body is inactive, the prāṇa, or the life air, is active. Up to the age of fifty one can actively work for sense gratification, but after the fiftieth year one’s energy decreases, although one can with great strain work for two or three more years — perhaps up to the fifty-fifth year. Thus the fifty-fifth year is generally taken by government regulations as the final year for retirement. The energy, which is fatigued after fifty years, is figuratively described herein as a serpent with five hoods.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Caṇḍavega and his followers began to plunder the city of Purañjana, the watchman began to defend the city. When they began to plunder the body which had surpassed fifty years, the watchman, the life air, defended it. “Do not loot this city while I am here!” he said with pride. Even if one reaches fifty years, for two or three years the strength does not decrease.
A five-hooded snake (life-airs) defended the city. The vital force does its job for years, holding back the time-army by sheer biological persistence.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I thanked the life-airs that have been quietly defending me?
  • What does it mean that defense is largely automatic, not heroic?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.16

↗
स सप्तभि: शतैरेको विंशत्या च शतं समा: । पुरञ्जनपुराध्यक्षो गन्धर्वैर्युयुधे बली ॥ १६ ॥
sa saptabhiḥ śatair eko
[sa saptabhih shatair eko]
viṁśatyā ca śataṁ samāḥ
[vimshatyaa cha shatam samaah]
purañjana-purādhyakṣo
[puranjana-puraadhyaksho]
gandharvair yuyudhe balī
[gandharvair yuyudhe balee]
saḥ — he saptabhiḥ — with seven śataiḥ — hundred ekaḥ — alone viṁśatyā — with twenty ca — also śatam — hundred samāḥ — years purañjana — of King Purañjana pura-adhyakṣaḥ — superintendent of the city gandharvaiḥ — with the Gandharvas yuyudhe — fought balī — very valiant.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa saptabhiḥ śatair eko
saḥ
he
saptabhiḥ
with seven
śataiḥ
hundred
ekaḥ
alone
viṁśatyā ca śataṁ samāḥ
viṁśatyā
with twenty
ca
also
śatam
hundred
samāḥ
years
purañjana-purādhyakṣo
purañjana
of King Purañjana
pura-adhyakṣaḥ
superintendent of the city
gandharvair yuyudhe balī
gandharvaiḥ
with the Gandharvas
yuyudhe
fought
balī
very valiant.
The five-hooded serpent, the superintendent and protector of the city of King Purañjana, fought with the Gandharvas for one hundred years. He fought alone, with all of them, although they numbered 720.

The 360 days and 360 nights combine to become the 720 soldiers of Caṇḍavega (time). One has to fight these soldiers throughout one’s life span, beginning with birth and ending with death. This fight is called the struggle for existence. Despite this struggle, however, the living entity does not die. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (2.20) , the living entity is eternal:

na jāyate mriyate vā kadācin nāyaṁ bhūtvā bhavitā vā na bhūyaḥ ajo nityaḥ śāśvato ’yaṁ purāṇo na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre

“For the soul there is never birth nor death. Nor, having once been, does he ever cease to be. He is unborn, eternal, ever-existing, undying and primeval. He is not slain when the body is slain.” Actually the living entity does not take birth nor does he die, but he has to fight with the stringent laws of material nature throughout the entire span of his lifetime. He must also face different kinds of miserable conditions. Despite all this, the living entity, due to illusion, thinks that he is well situated in sense gratification.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The five-hooded serpent, the superintendent of the city of King Purañjana, actually fought alone with the 720 Gandharvas for one hundred years. The battle between the Gandharvas and the guard actually began from birth. For 720 days and nights each year, they fought. The lifespan is one hundred years.
The five-hooded serpent fought the 720 Gandharvas alone for 100 years. The vital force is heroic but outnumbered; 100 years is the maximum it can hold.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I taking the vital force's persistence for granted as if it were unlimited?
  • What changes if I'm honest that 100 years is the most this defender can hold?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.17

↗
क्षीयमाणे स्वसम्बन्धे एकस्मिन् बहुभिर्युधा । चिन्तां परां जगामार्त: सराष्ट्रपुरबान्धव: ॥ १७ ॥
kṣīyamāṇe sva-sambandhe
[ksheeyamaane sva-sambandhe]
ekasmin bahubhir yudhā
[ekasmin bahubhir yudhaa]
cintāṁ parāṁ jagāmārtaḥ
[chintaam paraam jagaamaartah]
sa-rāṣṭra-pura-bāndhavaḥ
[sa-raashtra-pura-baandhavah]
kṣīyamāṇe — when he became weak sva-sambandhe — his intimate friend ekasmin — alone bahubhiḥ — with many warriors yudhā — by battle cintām — anxiety parām — very great jagāma — obtained ārtaḥ — being aggrieved sa — along with rāṣṭra — of the kingdom pura — of the city bāndhavaḥ — friends and relatives.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣīyamāṇe sva-sambandhe
kṣīyamāṇe
when he became weak
sva-sambandhe
his intimate friend
ekasmin bahubhir yudhā
ekasmin
alone
bahubhiḥ
with many warriors
yudhā
by battle
cintāṁ parāṁ jagāmārtaḥ
cintām
anxiety
parām
very great
jagāma
obtained
ārtaḥ
being aggrieved
sa-rāṣṭra-pura-bāndhavaḥ
sa
along with
rāṣṭra
of the kingdom
pura
of the city
bāndhavaḥ
friends and relatives.
Because he had to fight alone with so many soldiers, all of whom were great warriors, the serpent with five hoods became very weak. Seeing that his most intimate friend was weakening, King Purañjana and his friends and citizens living within the city all became very anxious.

The living entity resides within the body and struggles for existence with the limbs of the body, which are referred to here as citizens and friends. One can struggle alone with many soldiers for some time, but not for all time. The living entity within the body can struggle up to the limit of a hundred years with good luck, but after that it is not possible to prolong the struggle. Thus the living entity submits and falls victim. In this regard, Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura has sung, vṛddha kāla āola saba sukha bhāgala: when one becomes old, it becomes impossible to enjoy material happiness. Generally people think that religion and piety come at the end of life, and at this time one generally becomes meditative and takes to some so-called yogic process to relax in the name of meditation. Meditation, however, is simply a farce for those who have enjoyed life in sense gratification. As described in the Sixth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā, meditation ( dhyāna, dhāraṇā ) is a difficult subject matter that one has to learn from his very youth. To meditate, one must restrain himself from all kinds of sense gratification. Unfortunately, meditation has now become a fashion for those who are overly addicted to sensual things. Such meditation is defeated by the struggle for existence. Sometimes such meditative processes pass for transcendental meditation. King Purañjana, the living entity, being thus victimized by the hard struggle for existence, took to transcendental meditation with his friends and relatives.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing his relative grow weak from fighting with many soldiers, the unhappy King and the citizens became very worried. For fifty-three years, the watchman could not be defeated. After that, however, gradually he was defeated. Purañjana became unhappy on seeing that his life air, his relative, was growing weak.
Weakening alone against many warriors, he caused anxiety to Purañjana and citizens. The body's slow decline registers as growing anxiety in everyone who depends on it.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose slow decline am I anxious about and avoiding addressing directly?
  • Where do I treat aging as a private issue when it actually impacts an entire 'city'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.18

↗
स एव पुर्यां मधुभुक्पञ्चालेषु स्वपार्षदै: । उपनीतं बलिं गृह्णन् स्त्रीजितो नाविदद्भयम् ॥ १८ ॥
sa eva puryāṁ madhu-bhuk
[sa eva puryaam madhu-bhuk]
pañcāleṣu sva-pārṣadaiḥ
[panchaaleshu sva-paarshadaih]
upanītaṁ baliṁ gṛhṇan
[upaneetam balim grihnan]
strī-jito nāvidad bhayam
[stree-jito naavidad bhayam]
saḥ — he eva — certainly puryām — within the city madhu-bhuk — enjoying sex life pañcāleṣu — in the kingdom of Pañcāla (five sense objects) sva-pārṣadaiḥ — along with his followers upanītam — brought balim — taxes gṛhṇan — accepting strī-jitaḥ — conquered by women na — did not avidat — understand bhayam — fear of death.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa eva puryāṁ madhu-bhuk
saḥ
he
eva
certainly
puryām
within the city
madhu-bhuk
enjoying sex life
pañcāleṣu sva-pārṣadaiḥ
pañcāleṣu
in the kingdom of Pañcāla (five sense objects)
sva-pārṣadaiḥ
along with his followers
upanītaṁ baliṁ gṛhṇan
upanītam
brought
balim
taxes
gṛhṇan
accepting
strī-jito nāvidad bhayam
strī-jitaḥ
conquered by women
na
did not
avidat
understand
bhayam
fear of death.
King Purañjana collected taxes in the city known as Pañcāla and thus was able to engage in sexual indulgence. Being completely under the control of women, he could not understand that his life was passing away and that he was reaching the point of death.

Government men — including kings, presidents, secretaries and ministers — are in a position to utilize taxes collected from the citizens for sense gratification. It is stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam that in this Kali-yuga government men ( rājanyas ) and those connected with the government, as well as exalted government ministers, secretaries and presidents, will all simply collect taxes for sense gratification. The government is top-heavy, and without increasing taxes the government cannot maintain itself. When taxes are collected they are utilized for the sense gratification of the government officials. Such irresponsible politicians forget that there is a time when death will come to take away all their sense gratification. Some of them are convinced that after life everything is finished. This atheistic theory was conceived long ago by a philosopher called Cārvāka. Cārvāka recommended that man should live very opulently by either begging, borrowing or stealing. He also maintained that one should not be afraid of death, the next life, the past life or an impious life because after the body is burnt to ashes everything is finished. This is the philosophy of those who are too much materially addicted. Such philosophizing will not save one from the danger of death, nor will it save one from an abominable afterlife.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The King, enjoying insignificant pleasures in the city along with his followers, controlled by women, accepting taxes brought from the five provinces, did not know fear. He enjoyed insignificant pleasures (madhu-bhuk) along with the senses (sva-pārṣadaiḥ).
He collected taxes and indulged in sex, completely controlled by women, not noticing his life passing. Even as the defender weakens, the king keeps extracting and indulging — denial as policy.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I still 'collecting taxes and indulging' while the defender weakens?
  • What policy of mine would I have to change if I admitted what's happening?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.19

↗
कालस्य दुहिता काचित्‍त्रिलोकीं वरमिच्छती । पर्यटन्ती न बर्हिष्मन् प्रत्यनन्दत कश्चन ॥ १९ ॥
kālasya duhitā kācit
[kaalasya duhitaa kaachit]
tri-lokīṁ varam icchatī
[tri-lokeem varam ichchatee]
paryaṭantī na barhiṣman
[paryatantee na barhishman]
pratyanandata kaścana
[pratyanandata kashchana]
kālasya — of formidable Time duhitā — the daughter kācit — someone tri-lokīm — within the three worlds varam — husband icchatī — desiring paryaṭantī — traveling all over the universe na — never barhiṣman — O King Prācīnabarhiṣat pratyanandata — accepted her proposal kaścana — anyone.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kālasya duhitā kācit
kālasya
of formidable Time
duhitā
the daughter
kācit
someone
tri-lokīṁ varam icchatī
tri-lokīm
within the three worlds
varam
husband
icchatī
desiring
paryaṭantī na barhiṣman
paryaṭantī
traveling all over the universe
na
never
barhiṣman
O King Prācīnabarhiṣat
pratyanandata kaścana
pratyanandata
accepted her proposal
kaścana
anyone.
My dear King Prācīnabarhiṣat, at this time the daughter of formidable Time was seeking her husband throughout the three worlds. Although no one agreed to accept her, she came.

In due course of time, when the body becomes old and practically invalid, it is subject to jarā, the sufferings of old age. There are four basic kinds of suffering — birth, old age, disease and death. No scientist or philosopher has ever been able to make a solution to these four miserable conditions. The invalidity of old age known as jarā is figuratively explained here as the daughter of Time. No one likes her, but she is very much anxious to accept anyone as her husband. No one likes to become old and invalid, but this is inevitable for everyone.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Wandering through the three worlds, the daughter of Time desired a husband, but no one wanted her. The entrance of old age is described through a story. O Barhiṣman! No one wanted (pratyanandata) her.
The daughter of formidable Time (Jarā, old age) sought a husband through the three worlds; no one accepted her, then she came. Old age is shopping for a husband; she'll find someone, no matter how unwelcome.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I refuse to acknowledge that Jarā is on her way to me, husband-shopping?
  • Whose old age have I treated as their failure rather than as universal weather?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.20

↗
दौर्भाग्येनात्मनो लोके विश्रुता दुर्भगेति सा । या तुष्टा राजर्षये तु वृतादात्पूरवे वरम् ॥ २० ॥
daurbhāgyenātmano loke
[daurbhaagyenaatmano loke]
viśrutā durbhageti sā
[vishrutaa durbhageti saa]
yā tuṣṭā rājarṣaye tu
[yaa tushtaa raajarshaye tu]
vṛtādāt pūrave varam
[vritaadaat poorave varam]
daurbhāgyena — on account of misfortune ātmanaḥ — of herself loke — in the world viśrutā — celebrated durbhagā — most unfortunate iti — thus sā — she yā — who tuṣṭā — being satisfied rāja-ṛṣaye — unto the great king tu — but vṛtā — being accepted adāt — delivered pūrave — unto King Pūru varam — benediction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
daurbhāgyenātmano loke
daurbhāgyena
on account of misfortune
ātmanaḥ
of herself
loke
in the world
viśrutā durbhageti sā
viśrutā
celebrated
durbhagā
most unfortunate
iti
thus
sā
she
yā tuṣṭā rājarṣaye tu
yā
who
tuṣṭā
being satisfied
rāja-ṛṣaye
unto the great king
tu
but
vṛtādāt pūrave varam
vṛtā
being accepted
adāt
delivered
pūrave
unto King Pūru
varam
benediction.
The daughter of Time [Jarā] was very unfortunate. Consequently she was known as Durbhagā [“ill-fated”]. However, she was once pleased with a great king, and because the king accepted her, she granted him a great benediction.

As Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura sings, saba sukha bhāgala: all kinds of happiness disappear in old age. Consequently, no one likes old age, or jarā. Thus Jarā, as the daughter of Time, is known as a most unfortunate daughter. She was, however, at one time accepted by a great king, Yayāti. Yayāti was cursed by his father-in-law, Śukrācārya, to accept her. When Śukrācārya’s daughter was married to King Yayāti, one of her friends named Śarmiṣṭhā went with her. Later King Yayāti became very much attached to Śarmiṣṭhā, and Śukrācārya’s daughter complained to her father. Consequently, Śukrācārya cursed King Yayāti to become prematurely old. King Yayāti had five youthful sons, and he begged all his sons to exchange their youth for his old age. No one agreed except the youngest son, whose name was Pūru. Upon accepting Yayāti’s old age, Pūru was given the kingdom. It is said that two of Yayāti’s other sons, being disobedient to their father, were given kingdoms outside of India, most probably Turkey and Greece. The purport is that one can accumulate wealth and all kinds of material opulences but during old age one cannot enjoy them. Although Pūru attained his father’s kingdom, he could not enjoy all the opulence, for he had sacrificed his youth. One should not wait for old age in order to become Kṛṣṇa conscious. Due to the invalidity of old age, one cannot make progress in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, however opulent he may be materially.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because she brought misfortune, she was known as Misfortune. Accepted by saintly King Puru and pleased with him, she gave him a benediction. Since she was accepted by the son of Yayāti, Puru, she gave him a boon. Yayātī, satisfied with the son for accepting his old age, gave him the kingdom. That is the meaning when it is said in this verse that old age gave him a benediction.
She was unfortunate ('Durbhagā') but once pleased a king and granted him a benediction. Even old age can grant gifts; recognize what she gives, not just what she takes.
Reflection Questions
  • What benediction might my own aging be quietly preparing for me?
  • Where do I notice only what aging removes and miss what it offers?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.21

↗
कदाचिदटमाना सा ब्रह्मलोकान्महीं गतम् । वव्रे बृहद्‌व्रतं मां तु जानती काममोहिता ॥ २१ ॥
kadācid aṭamānā sā
[kadaachid atamaanaa saa]
brahma-lokān mahīṁ gatam
[brahma-lokaan maheem gatam]
vavre bṛhad-vrataṁ māṁ tu
[vavre brihad-vratam maam tu]
jānatī kāma-mohitā
[jaanatee kaama-mohitaa]
kadācit — once upon a time aṭamānā — traveling sā — she brahma-lokāt — from Brahmaloka, the highest planet mahīm — on the earth gatam — having come vavre — she proposed bṛhat-vratam — avowed brahmacārī mām — unto me tu — then jānatī — knowing kāma-mohitā — being illusioned by lust.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kadācid aṭamānā sā
kadācit
once upon a time
aṭamānā
traveling
sā
she
brahma-lokān mahīṁ gatam
brahma-lokāt
from Brahmaloka, the highest planet
mahīm
on the earth
gatam
having come
vavre bṛhad-vrataṁ māṁ tu
vavre
she proposed
bṛhat-vratam
avowed brahmacārī
mām
unto me
tu
then
jānatī kāma-mohitā
jānatī
knowing
kāma-mohitā
being illusioned by lust.
When I once came to this earth from Brahmaloka, the highest planetary system, the daughter of Time, wandering over the universe, met me. Knowing me to be an avowed brahmacārī, she became lusty and proposed that I accept her.

The great sage Nārada Muni was a naiṣṭhika-brahmacārī — that is, he never had sex life. He was consequently an ever-green youth. Old age, jarā, could not attack him. The invalidity of old age can overcome an ordinary man, but Nārada Muni was different. Taking Nārada Muni to be an ordinary man, the daughter of Time confronted him with her lusty desire. It requires great strength to resist a woman’s attraction. It is difficult for old men, and what to speak of young. Those who live as brahmacārīs must follow in the footsteps of the great sage Nārada Muni, who never accepted the proposals of Jarā. Those who are too much sexually addicted become victims of jarā, and very soon their life span is shortened. Without utilizing the human form of life for Kṛṣṇa consciousness, the victims of jarā die very soon in this world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One time, bewildered by lust, knowing that I was a brahmacārī, she proposed on her own to me when I came to earth from Brahmaloka. She thought Nārada was an earthling when he came to the earth. She did not at all reject him even though he was a life-long celibate, or sannyāsī, having great powers.
Once I came from Brahmaloka and Kālakanyā, knowing me a brahmacārī, became lusty and proposed. Even old age tries to attach to the unattached; refusing her is itself a discipline.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does old age try to find purchase even in those who have rejected sense-life?
  • What does it mean that the brahmacārī's refusal becomes a curse with consequences?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.22

↗
मयि संरभ्य विपुलमदाच्छापं सुदु:सहम् । स्थातुमर्हसि नैकत्र मद्याच्ञाविमुखो मुने ॥ २२ ॥
mayi saṁrabhya vipula-
[mayi samrabhya vipula-]
madāc chāpaṁ suduḥsaham
[madaach chaapam suduhsaham]
sthātum arhasi naikatra
[sthaatum arhasi naikatra]
mad-yācṣā-vimukho mune
[mad-yaachshaa-vimukho mune]
mayi — unto me saṁrabhya — having become angry vipula — unlimited madāt — out of illusion śāpam — curse su-duḥsaham — unbearable sthātum arhasi — you may remain na — never ekatra — in one place mat — my yācṣā — request vimukhaḥ — having refused mune — O great sage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mayi saṁrabhya vipula-
mayi
unto me
saṁrabhya
having become angry
vipula
unlimited
madāc chāpaṁ suduḥsaham
madāt
out of illusion
śāpam
curse
su-duḥsaham
unbearable
sthātum arhasi naikatra
sthātum arhasi
you may remain
na
never
ekatra
in one place
mad-yācṣā-vimukho mune
mat
my
yācṣā
request
vimukhaḥ
having refused
mune
O great sage.
The great sage Nārada continued: When I refused to accept her request, she became very angry at me and cursed me severely. Because I refused her request, she said that I would not be able to stay in one place for a long time.

The great sage Nārada Muni has a spiritual body; therefore old age, disease, birth and death do not affect him. Nārada is the most kind devotee of the Supreme Lord, and his only business is to travel all over the universe and preach God consciousness. In other words, his business is to make everyone a Vaiṣṇava. Under the circumstances, there is ordinarily no need for him to stay in one place for more than the time he requires to preach. Since by his own free will he is already traveling all over the universe, the curse of Kālakanyā is described as fortunate. Like Nārada Muni, many other devotees of the Lord are engaged in preaching the glories of the Lord in different places and in different universes. Such personalities are beyond the jurisdiction of material laws.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Angry with me, she uttered a great, intolerable curse. “O sage! You cannot stay in one place since you have refused my request.” Angry with me for refusing, she cursed me. Actually, because I do not have any prārabdha-karmas in my body, and thus am devoid of the six afflictions of lamentation, illusion, old age, death, hunger and thirst, she cannot affect me. By refusing her request, I am able to travel everywhere to deliver people as a result of her curse, which became a form of mercy.
Refused, she angrily cursed me — that I would not stay in one place for long. Refusing certain offers earns a wandering life; some 'curses' are also missions in disguise.
Reflection Questions
  • Which curse on me may actually be the shape of my dharma?
  • Where do I treat wandering as failure when it might be the way?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.23

↗
ततो विहतसङ्कल्पा कन्यका यवनेश्वरम् । मयोपदिष्टमासाद्य वव्रे नाम्ना भयं पतिम् ॥ २३ ॥
tato vihata-saṅkalpā
[tato vihata-sankalpaa]
kanyakā yavaneśvaram
[kanyakaa yavaneshvaram]
mayopadiṣṭam āsādya
[mayopadishtam aasaadya]
vavre nāmnā bhayaṁ patim
[vavre naamnaa bhayam patim]
tataḥ — thereafter vihata-saṅkalpā — being disappointed in her determination kanyakā — the daughter of Time yavana-īśvaram — unto the king of the untouchables mayā upadiṣṭam — indicated by me āsādya — having approached vavre — accepted nāmnā — of the name bhayam — Fear patim — as her husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tato vihata-saṅkalpā
tataḥ
thereafter
vihata-saṅkalpā
being disappointed in her determination
kanyakā
the daughter of Time
kanyakā yavaneśvaram
yavana-īśvaram
unto the king of the untouchables
mayopadiṣṭam āsādya
mayā upadiṣṭam
indicated by me
āsādya
having approached
vavre nāmnā bhayaṁ patim
vavre
accepted
nāmnā
of the name
bhayam
Fear
patim
as her husband.
After she was thus disappointed by me, with my permission she approached the King of the Yavanas, whose name was Bhaya, or Fear, and she accepted him as her husband.

Being the most perfect Vaiṣṇava, Śrī Nārada Muni is always willing to do good to others, even to one who curses him. Although Kālakanyā, the daughter of Time, was refused by Nārada Muni, she was given a shelter. Of course no one could give her shelter, but a Vaiṣṇava gives shelter somewhere to such an unfortunate girl. When jarā, or old age, attacks, everyone dwindles and deteriorates. In one stroke Nārada Muni gave shelter to Kālakanyā and counterattacked the ordinary karmīs. If one accepts the instructions of Nārada Muni, the ocean of fear ( bhaya ) can be very quickly removed by the grace of that great Vaiṣṇava.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having been thwarted in her determination, the daughter of Time, as instructed by me, approached the King of the Yavanas named Fear, and choose him as her husband. Nārada, showing mercy instructed, “People’s fear should be weakened by the influence of old age.”
With my permission she went to Yavana-rāja Bhaya ('Fear') and accepted him as husband. Old age is married to Fear; the pair is structural, not coincidental.
Reflection Questions
  • Which fears in me have intensified specifically because age has arrived?
  • What does it mean that Old Age and Fear are formal spouses, not random visitors?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.24

↗
ऋषभं यवनानां त्वां वृणे वीरेप्सितं पतिम् । सङ्कल्पस्त्वयि भूतानां कृत: किल न रिष्यति ॥ २४ ॥
ṛṣabhaṁ yavanānāṁ tvāṁ
[rishabham yavanaanaam tvaam]
vṛṇe vīrepsitaṁ patim
[vrine veerepsitam patim]
saṅkalpas tvayi bhūtānāṁ
[sankalpas tvayi bhootaanaam]
kṛtaḥ kila na riṣyati
[kritah kila na rishyati]
ṛṣabham — the best yavanānām — of the untouchables tvām — you vṛṇe — I accept vīra — O great hero īpsitam — desired patim — husband saṅkalpaḥ — the determination tvayi — unto you bhūtānām — of all living entities kṛtaḥ — if done kila — certainly na — never riṣyati — becomes baffled.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ṛṣabhaṁ yavanānāṁ tvāṁ
ṛṣabham
the best
yavanānām
of the untouchables
tvām
you
vṛṇe vīrepsitaṁ patim
vṛṇe
I accept
vīra
O great hero
īpsitam
desired
patim
husband
saṅkalpas tvayi bhūtānāṁ
saṅkalpaḥ
the determination
tvayi
unto you
bhūtānām
of all living entities
kṛtaḥ kila na riṣyati
kṛtaḥ
if done
kila
certainly
na
never
riṣyati
becomes baffled.
Approaching the King of the Yavanas, Kālakanyā addressed him as a great hero, saying: My dear sir, you are the best of the untouchables. I am in love with you, and I want you as my husband. I know that no one is baffled if he makes friends with you.

The words yavanānām ṛṣabham refer to the King of the Yavanas. The Sanskrit words yavana and mleccha apply to those who do not follow the Vedic principles. According to the Vedic principles, one should rise early in the morning, take bath, chant Hare Kṛṣṇa, offer maṅgala-ārati to the Deities, study Vedic literature, take prasāda and engage in dressing and decorating the Deities. One must also collect money for the temple expenditures, or if one is a householder he must go to work in accordance with the prescribed duties of a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra. In this way one should live a life of spiritual understanding, and this is the Vedic way of civilization. One who does not follow all these rules and regulations is called a yavana or mleccha. One should not mistakenly think that these words refer to certain classes of men in other countries. There is no question of limitation according to nationalism. Whether one lives in India or outside of India, he is called a yavana or mleccha if he does not follow the Vedic principles. One who does not actually follow the hygienic principles prescribed in the Vedic rules and regulations will be subjected to many contagious diseases. Because the students in this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement are advised to follow the Vedic principles, they naturally become hygienic.

If a person is Kṛṣṇa conscious, he can work like a young man even if he is seventy-five or eighty years old. Thus the daughter of Kāla (Time) cannot overcome a Vaiṣṇava. Śrīla Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja Gosvāmī engaged in writing Caitanya-caritāmṛta when he was very old, yet he presented the most wonderful literature about the activities of Lord Caitanya. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī and Sanātana Gosvāmī began their spiritual lives at a very old age — that is, after they retired from their occupations and family lives — yet they presented many valuable literatures for the advancement of spiritual life. This is confirmed by Śrīla Śrīnivāsa Ācārya, who praised the Gosvāmīs in this way:

nānā-śāstra-vicāraṇaika-nipuṇau sad-dharma-saṁsthāpakau lokānāṁ hita-kāriṇau tri-bhuvane mānyau śaraṇyākarau rādhā-kṛṣṇa-padāravinda-bhajanānandena mattālikau vande rūpa-sanātanau raghu-yugau śrī-jīva-gopālakau

“I offer my respectful obeisances unto the Six Gosvāmīs, namely Śrī Sanātana Gosvāmī, Śrī Rūpa Gosvāmī, Śrī Raghunātha Bhaṭṭa Gosvāmī, Śrī Raghunātha dāsa Gosvāmī, Śrī Jīva Gosvāmī and Śrī Gopāla Bhaṭṭa Gosvāmī, who are very expert in scrutinizingly studying all the revealed scriptures with the aim of establishing eternal religious principles for the benefit of all human beings. Thus they are honored all over the three worlds, and they are worth taking shelter of because they are absorbed in the mood of the gopīs and are engaged in the transcendental loving service of Rādhā and Kṛṣṇa.”

Thus jarā, the effect of old age, does not harass a devotee. This is because a devotee follows the instructions and the determination of Nārada Muni. All devotees are in the disciplic succession stemming from Nārada Muni because they worship the Deity according to Nārada Muni’s direction, namely the Nārada-pañcarātra, or the pāñcarātrika-vidhi. A devotee follows the principles of pāñcarātrika-vidhi as well as bhāgavata-vidhi. Bhāgavata-vidhi includes preaching work — śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ — the hearing and chanting of the glories of Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The pāñcarātrika-vidhi includes arcanaṁ vandanaṁ dāsyaṁ sakhyam ātma-nivedanam. Because a devotee rigidly follows the instructions of Nārada Muni, he has no fear of old age, disease or death. Apparently a devotee may grow old, but he is not subjected to the symptoms of defeat experienced by a common man in old age. Consequently, old age does not make a devotee fearful of death, as a common man is fearful of death. When jarā, or old age, takes shelter of a devotee, Kālakanyā diminishes the devotee’s fear. A devotee knows that after death he is going back home, back to Godhead; therefore he has no fear of death. Thus instead of depressing a devotee, advanced age helps him become fearless and thus happy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O hero! I accept you, best of the Yavanas, as my desired husband, since the desires of the people should not be destroyed by fear. Fear was the king of the Yavanas, who represents mental and physical diseases. There is a second meaning to the last phrase. The vow of the devotees is never destroyed (riṣyati). The devotee Nārada made a vow that peoples’ fear should become lessened. So let that not be otherwise. Therefore, become my husband so I can enjoy you. Bhūta can mean the devotee of the Lord for it is said: janasya kṛṣṇād vimukhasya daivād adharma-śīlasya suduḥkhitasya anugrahāyeha caranti nūnaṁ bhūtāni bhavyāni janārdanasya In order to give mercy to the suffering people engaged in sin, under the control of karma, who are ignorant of Kṛṣṇa, the auspicious devotees of the Lord move in this world. SB 3.5.3
Kālakanyā praised Yavana-rāja as best of untouchables; she loved him and wanted him as husband. Old age finds her natural ally in those who don't follow dharma; lifestyle and aging interact directly.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does my own non-dharmic conduct invite Old Age to claim me earlier or harder?
  • What habit, changed, might delay her proposal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.25

↗
द्वाविमावनुशोचन्ति बालावसदवग्रहौ । यल्लोकशास्त्रोपनतं न राति न तदिच्छति ॥ २५ ॥
dvāv imāv anuśocanti
[dvaav imaav anushochanti]
bālāv asad-avagrahau
[baalaav asad-avagrahau]
yal loka-śāstropanataṁ
[yal loka-shaastropanatam]
na rāti na tad icchati
[na raati na tad ichchati]
dvau — two kinds imau — these anuśocanti — they lament bālau — ignorant asat — the foolish avagrahau — taking the path of yat — that which loka — by custom śāstra — by scriptures upanatam — presented na — never rāti — follows na — neither tat — that icchati — desires.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dvāv imāv anuśocanti
dvau
two kinds
imau
these
anuśocanti
they lament
bālāv asad-avagrahau
bālau
ignorant
asat
the foolish
avagrahau
taking the path of
yal loka-śāstropanataṁ
yat
that which
loka
by custom
śāstra
by scriptures
upanatam
presented
na
never
na rāti na tad icchati
rāti
follows
na
neither
tat
that
icchati
desires.
One who does not give charity according to the customs or injunctions of the scriptures and one who does not accept charity in that way are considered to be in the mode of ignorance. Such persons follow the path of the foolish. Surely they must lament at the end.

It is herein stated that one should strictly follow the scriptures if one actually wants an auspicious life. The same is explained in Bhagavad-gītā (16.23) :

yaḥ śāstra-vidhim utsṛjya vartate kāma-kārataḥ na sa siddhim avāpnoti na sukhaṁ na parāṁ gatim

“He who discards scriptural injunctions and acts according to his own whims attains neither perfection, nor happiness, nor the supreme destination.” One who does not strictly follow the terms of the Vedic injunctions never attains success in life or happiness. And what to speak of going home, back to Godhead.

One śāstric injunction holds that a householder, a kṣatriya or an administrative head should not refuse to accept a woman if she voluntarily requests to become a wife. Since Kālakanyā, the daughter of Time, was deputed by Nārada Muni to offer herself to Yavana-rāja, the King of the Yavanas could not refuse her. All transactions must be performed in light of the śāstric injunctions. The śāstric injunctions are confirmed by great sages like Nārada Muni. As stated by Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura, sādhu-śāstra-guru-vākya, cittete kariyā aikya: one should follow the principles of saintly persons, scriptures and the spiritual master. In this way one is sure to attain success in life. Kālakanyā, the daughter of Time, presented herself before the King of the Yavanas precisely in terms of sādhu, śāstra and guru. Thus there was no reason for not accepting her.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devotees lament two types of ignorant people who accept the temporary world: those who do not give what should be given according to scripture and common understanding, and those who do not accept what should be accepted according to scripture and common understanding. The devotees lament two types of ignorant people. The ignorant person does not give things that should be given according to scripture and common understanding and does not receive things to be received. I, an unmarried girl, have come suddenly to your house. You, as a householder, should accept me. Or, Nārada, being merciful to the people, desired that people’s fear should decrease. That wish is according to common understanding and scripture. Therefore accept me.
Those who don't follow scriptural injunctions on charity must lament at the end. Foolish lifestyles produce inevitable end-stage regret; install correction now.
Reflection Questions
  • Which current lifestyle pattern of mine guarantees end-stage regret?
  • What small course-correction now would dramatically reduce future lament?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.26

↗
अथो भजस्व मां भद्र भजन्तीं मे दयां कुरु । एतावान् पौरुषो धर्मो यदार्ताननुकम्पते ॥ २६ ॥
atho bhajasva māṁ bhadra
[atho bhajasva maam bhadra]
bhajantīṁ me dayāṁ kuru
[bhajanteem me dayaam kuru]
etāvān pauruṣo dharmo
[etaavaan paurusho dharmo]
yad ārtān anukampate
[yad aartaan anukampate]
atho — therefore bhajasva — accept mām — me bhadra — O gentle one bhajantīm — willing to serve me — to me dayām — mercy kuru — do etāvān — such a measure pauruṣaḥ — for any gentleman dharmaḥ — religious principle yat — that ārtān — to the distressed anukampate — is compassionate.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atho bhajasva māṁ bhadra
atho
therefore
bhajasva
accept
mām
me
bhadra
O gentle one
bhajantīṁ me dayāṁ kuru
bhajantīm
willing to serve
me
to me
dayām
mercy
kuru
do
etāvān pauruṣo dharmo
etāvān
such a measure
pauruṣaḥ
for any gentleman
dharmaḥ
religious principle
yad ārtān anukampate
yat
that
ārtān
to the distressed
anukampate
is compassionate.
Kālakanyā continued: O gentle one, I am now present before you to serve you. Please accept me and thus show me mercy. It is a gentleman’s greatest duty to be compassionate upon a person who is distressed.

Yavana-rāja, the King of the Yavanas, could also refuse to accept Kālakanyā, daughter of Time, but he considered the request due to the order of Nārada Muni. Thus he accepted Kālakanyā in a different way. In other words, the injunctions of Nārada Muni, or the path of devotional service, can be accepted by anyone within the three worlds, and certainly by the King of the Yavanas. Lord Caitanya Himself requested everyone to preach the cult of bhakti-yoga all over the world, in every village and town. Preachers in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement have actually experienced that even the yavanas and mlecchas have taken to spiritual life on the strength of Nārada Muni’s pāñcarātrika-vidhi. When mankind follows the disciplic succession, as recommended by Caitanya Mahāprabhu, everyone throughout the world will benefit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O good man! Therefore, accept me. Be merciful to me, who worship you, for the dharma of man is showing compassion to the suffering. Paursaḥ means “accomplished by a man.” Even if you show strength, you cannot say “I will not accept old age” because, equipped with Nārada’s vow, I will destroy you. Internally saying this, externally she then spoke with crooked, joking words.
Please accept me; be compassionate; a gentleman's greatest duty is compassion for the distressed. Even unwelcome forces (old age, decline) request acceptance by appeal to compassion.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could I receive a difficult force in my life by treating its request with compassion rather than rejection?
  • What would 'gentleman's compassion' toward my own decline look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.27

↗
कालकन्योदितवचो निशम्य यवनेश्वर: । चिकीर्षुर्देवगुह्यं स सस्मितं तामभाषत ॥ २७ ॥
kāla-kanyodita-vaco
[kaala-kanyodita-vacho]
niśamya yavaneśvaraḥ
[nishamya yavaneshvarah]
cikīrṣur deva-guhyaṁ sa
[chikeershur deva-guhyam sa]
sasmitaṁ tām abhāṣata
[sasmitam taam abhaashata]
kāla-kanyā — by the daughter of Time udita — expressed vacaḥ — words niśamya — hearing yavana-īśvaraḥ — the King of the Yavanas cikīrṣuḥ — desiring to execute deva — of providence guhyam — confidential duty saḥ — he sa-smitam — smilingly tām — her abhāṣata — addressed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāla-kanyodita-vaco
kāla-kanyā
by the daughter of Time
udita
expressed
vacaḥ
words
niśamya yavaneśvaraḥ
niśamya
hearing
yavana-īśvaraḥ
the King of the Yavanas
cikīrṣur deva-guhyaṁ sa
cikīrṣuḥ
desiring to execute
deva
of providence
guhyam
confidential duty
saḥ
he
sasmitaṁ tām abhāṣata
sa-smitam
smilingly
tām
her
abhāṣata
addressed.
After hearing the statement of Kālakanyā, daughter of Time, the King of the Yavanas began to smile and devise a means for executing his confidential duty on behalf of providence. He then addressed Kālakanyā as follows.

In Caitanya-caritāmṛta ( Ādi 5.142) it is said:

ekale īśvara kṛṣṇa, āra saba bhṛtya yāre yaiche nācāya, se taiche kare nṛtya

Actually the supreme controller is the Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, and everyone is His servant. Yavana-rāja, the King of the Yavanas, was also a servant of Kṛṣṇa. Consequently, he wanted to execute the purpose of Kṛṣṇa through the agency of Kālakanyā. Although Kālakanyā means invalidity or old age, Yavana-rāja wanted to serve Kṛṣṇa by introducing Kālakanyā everywhere. Thus a sane person, by attaining old age, will become fearful of death. Foolish people engage in material activities as if they will live forever and enjoy material advancement, but actually there is no material advancement. Under illusion people think that material opulence will save them, but although there has been much advancement in material science, the problems of human society — birth, death, old age and disease — are still unsolved. Nonetheless foolish scientists are thinking that they have advanced materially. When Kālakanyā, the invalidity of old age, attacks them, they become fearful of death, if they are sane. Those who are insane simply do not care for death, nor do they know what is going to happen after death. They are under the wrong impression that after death there is no life, and consequently they act very irresponsibly in this life and enjoy unrestricted sense gratification. For an intelligent person, the appearance of old age is an impetus to spiritual life. People naturally fear impending death. The King of the Yavanas tried to utilize Kālakanyā for this purpose.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hearing the words uttered by the daughter of Time, the leader of the Yavanas, desiring to enact the secret desire of the Lord, spoke to her while smiling. He desired to put the wheel of saṁsāra into motion. This is the secret of the Lord (deva-guhyam). By smiling, he indicated that he could not refuse her words.
Yavana-rāja smiled and devised a confidential means for providence; he addressed her. Providence works through even adversarial agents; what looks like alliance with the dark is sometimes a hidden mercy.
Reflection Questions
  • Where might 'providence' be working through an apparent adversary in my life?
  • What confidential plan might be unfolding behind a face I've been calling enemy?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.28

↗
मया निरूपितस्तुभ्यं पतिरात्मसमाधिना । नाभिनन्दति लोकोऽयं त्वामभद्रामसम्मताम् ॥ २८ ॥
mayā nirūpitas tubhyaṁ
[mayaa niroopitas tubhyam]
patir ātma-samādhinā
[patir aatma-samaadhinaa]
nābhinandati loko ’yaṁ
[naabhinandati loko ’yam]
tvām abhadrām asammatām
[tvaam abhadraam asammataam]
mayā — by me nirūpitaḥ — settled tubhyam — for you patiḥ — husband ātma — of the mind samādhinā — by meditation na — never abhinandati — welcome lokaḥ — the people ayam — these tvām — you abhadrām — inauspicious asammatām — unacceptable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mayā nirūpitas tubhyaṁ
mayā
by me
nirūpitaḥ
settled
tubhyam
for you
patir ātma-samādhinā
patiḥ
husband
ātma
of the mind
samādhinā
by meditation
nābhinandati loko ’yaṁ
na
never
abhinandati
welcome
lokaḥ
the people
ayam
these
tvām abhadrām asammatām
tvām
you
abhadrām
inauspicious
asammatām
unacceptable.
The King of the Yavanas replied: After much consideration, I have arrived at a husband for you. Actually, as far as everyone is concerned, you are inauspicious and mischievous. Since no one likes you, how can anyone accept you as his wife?

After much consideration, the King of the Yavanas decided to make the best use of a bad bargain. Kālakanyā was a bad bargain, and no one liked her, but everything can be used for the service of the Lord. Thus the King of the Yavanas tried to utilize her for some purpose. The purpose has already been explained — that is, Kālakanyā as jarā, the invalidity of old age, can be used to arouse a sense of fear in people so that they will prepare for the next life by engaging in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After some thought, I have decided on a husband for you. Earth people do not welcome you, who are inauspicious and unacceptable. I have decided on a husband to enjoy you. The people of the earth planet (ayam lokaḥ) do not want you. Ātma-samādhinā means “by thoughts in the mind.”
He says: I've found a husband for you; you're inauspicious — no one would accept you as wife. The right framing of old age is sister-not-wife; useful but not consort.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I attempt to marry old age (fight her, embrace her) when the right relation is sibling?
  • What changes when I treat aging as adjacent rather than intimate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.29

↗
त्वमव्यक्तगतिर्भुङ्‌क्ष्व लोकं कर्मविनिर्मितम् । या हि मे पृतनायुक्ता प्रजानाशं प्रणेष्यसि ॥ २९ ॥
tvam avyakta-gatir bhuṅkṣva
[tvam avyakta-gatir bhunkshva]
lokaṁ karma-vinirmitam
[lokam karma-vinirmitam]
yā hi me pṛtanā-yuktā
[yaa hi me pritanaa-yuktaa]
prajā-nāśaṁ praṇeṣyasi
[prajaa-naasham praneshyasi]
tvam — you avyakta-gatiḥ — whose movement is imperceptible bhuṅkṣva — enjoy lokam — this world karma-vinirmitam — manufactured by fruitive activities yā — one who hi — certainly me — my pṛtanā — soldiers yuktā — helped by prajā-nāśam — annihilation of the living entities praṇeṣyasi — you shall carry out without any hindrance.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvam avyakta-gatir bhuṅkṣva
tvam
you
avyakta-gatiḥ
whose movement is imperceptible
bhuṅkṣva
enjoy
lokaṁ karma-vinirmitam
lokam
this world
karma-vinirmitam
manufactured by fruitive activities
yā hi me pṛtanā-yuktā
yā
one who
hi
certainly
me
my
pṛtanā
soldiers
yuktā
helped by
prajā-nāśaṁ praṇeṣyasi
prajā-nāśam
annihilation of the living entities
praṇeṣyasi
you shall carry out without any hindrance.
This world is a product of fruitive activities. Therefore you may imperceptibly attack people in general. Helped by my soldiers, you can kill them without opposition.

The word karma-vinirmitam means “manufactured by fruitive activities.” This entire material world, especially in these days, is the result of fruitive activities. Everyone is fully engaged in decorating the world with highways, motorcars, electricity, skyscrapers, industries, businesses, etc. All this appears very nice for those who are simply engaged in sense gratification and who are ignorant of spiritual identity. As described in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (5.5.4) :

nūnaṁ pramattaḥ kurute vikarma yad indriya-prītaya āpṛṇoti na sādhu manye yata ātmano ’yam asann api kleśada āsa dehaḥ

Those without knowledge of the spirit soul are mad after materialistic activities, and they perform all kinds of sinful activities simply for sense gratification. According to Ṛṣabhadeva, such activities are inauspicious because they force one to accept an abominable body in the next life. Everyone can experience that although we try to keep the body in a comfortable position, it is always giving pain and is subjected to the threefold miseries. Otherwise, why are there so many hospitals, welfare boards and insurance establishments? Actually, in this world there is no happiness. People are simply engaged trying to counteract unhappiness. Foolish people accept unhappiness as happiness; therefore the King of the Yavanas decided to attack such foolish people imperceptibly by old age, disease, and ultimately death. Of course, after death there must be birth; therefore Yavana-rāja thought it wise to kill all the karmīs through the agency of Kālakanyā and thus try to make them aware that materialistic advancement is not actually advancement. Every living entity is a spiritual being, and consequently without spiritual advancement the human form of life is ruined.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With invisible movement, enjoy this world made of karma. Assisted by my troops, you will destroy the population. Everyone will ask “Where has she come from?” Your movement is invisible. Acting in this way, you will attack the people and by force, the world will be your husband. This is the meaning. If you fear that the people will kill you, since you are so undesirable, you will be assisted by my troops. With them, be victorious! After enjoying the people, you will destroy them. Who will have the power to kill you?
This world is a product of fruitive activity; attack people imperceptibly, helped by my soldiers. Fear gives old age permission to advance with stealth; the campaign is structurally enabled.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does Fear in my own life license stealth-attacks of decline I'm not noticing?
  • What would reducing Fear do to the pace of aging's advance?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.27.30

↗
प्रज्वारोऽयं मम भ्राता त्वं च मे भगिनी भव । चराम्युभाभ्यां लोकेऽस्मिन्नव्यक्तो भीमसैनिक: ॥ ३० ॥
prajvāro ’yaṁ mama bhrātā
[prajvaaro ’yam mama bhraataa]
tvaṁ ca me bhaginī bhava
[tvam cha me bhaginee bhava]
carāmy ubhābhyāṁ loke ’sminn
[charaamy ubhaabhyaam loke ’sminn]
avyakto bhīma-sainikaḥ
[avyakto bheema-sainikah]
prajvāraḥ — named Prajvāra ayam — this mama — my bhrātā — brother tvam — you ca — also me — my bhaginī — sister bhava — become carāmi — I shall go about ubhābhyām — by both of you loke — in the world asmin — this avyaktaḥ — without being manifest bhīma — dangerous sainikaḥ — with soldiers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prajvāro ’yaṁ mama bhrātā
prajvāraḥ
named Prajvāra
ayam
this
mama
my
bhrātā
brother
tvaṁ ca me bhaginī bhava
tvam
you
ca
also
me
my
bhaginī
sister
bhava
become
carāmy ubhābhyāṁ loke ’sminn
carāmi
I shall go about
ubhābhyām
by both of you
loke
in the world
avyakto bhīma-sainikaḥ
asmin
this
avyaktaḥ
without being manifest
bhīma
dangerous
sainikaḥ
with soldiers.
The King of the Yavanas continued: Here is my brother Prajvāra. I now accept you as my sister. I shall employ both of you, as well as my dangerous soldiers, to act imperceptibly within this world.

Kālakanyā was sent by Nārada Muni to Yavana-rāja so that she might become his wife, but instead of accepting her as his wife, Yavana-rāja accepted her as his sister. Those who do not follow the Vedic principles are unrestricted as far as sex life is concerned. Consequently they sometimes do not hesitate to have sex with their sisters. In this Age of Kali there are many instances of such incest. Although Yavana-rāja accepted the request of Nārada Muni to show respect to him, he was nonetheless thinking of illicit sex. This was due to his being the King of the yavanas and mlecchas.

The word prajvāraḥ is very significant, for it means “the fever sent by Lord Viṣṇu.” Such a fever is always set at 107 degrees, the temperature at which a man dies. Thus the King of the mlecchas and yavanas requested the daughter of Time, Kālakanyā, to become his sister. There was no need to ask her to become his wife, for the yavanas and mlecchas do not make distinctions as far as sex life is concerned. Thus one may outwardly be a sister, mother or daughter and still have sex. Yavana-rāja’s brother was Prajvāra, and Kālakanyā was invalidity itself. Combined and strengthened by the soldiers of Yavana-rāja — namely nonhygienic conditions, illicit sex and ultimately a high degree of temperature to bring on death — they would be able to smash the materialistic way of life. In this connection it is significant that Nārada was immune to the attack of jarā, or invalidity. Similarly jarā, or the destructive force, cannot attack any follower of Nārada Muni or another pure Vaiṣṇava.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Fourth Canto, Twenty-seventh Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Attack by Caṇḍavega on the City of King Purañjana; the Character of Kālakanyā.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This is my brother Prajvāra. Become my sister. I shall move about with you two in this world, invisibly, with my fearful soldiers. Prajvāra means the Visnujvāra, since it includes the destructive nature of Śiva as well. I do not have a sister, so you become my sister. “But Nārada’s words should not become false. Please be my husband.” This will also be true. You are my sister, since we were both born in the family of Adharma, and you will also be my wife. [Note: Fear was born in Adharma’s lineage as the son of Quarrel and Profanity, along with Death, according to SB 4.8.2-4. Death had five children named Vyādhi, Jarā (Kāla-kanyā), Śoka, Tṛṣṇā and Krodha according to Agni Purāṇa. ] I am your brother and your husband. Thus, Nārada’s words will be true. If I go near the devotees of the Lord, however, having enjoyed me exceedingly, destroy me. And just as you did not make Nārada your husband, do not make the devotee of the Lord your husband. Therefore, I have said, “Enjoy invisibly the people made of karma.” Since the devotees are not made of karma, they do not become your husbands. I am your husband among all people (since they all have fear). Thus, Nārada’s words are made true. Thus ends the commentary on the Twenty-seventh Chapter of the Fourth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty-eight Purañjana Leaves His Body
I have a brother Prajvāra (fire of fever); I accept you as sister and we'll all act imperceptibly together. Old age, Fear and Fever travel together; their alliance is the natural conclusion of a non-dharmic life.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I see the alliance of decline-fear-fever already at work in those near me?
  • What single dharmic adjustment could weaken this alliance's claim on me?
📝 My note