FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

6.16 · King Citraketu Meets the Supreme Lord

62 verses · 🖨 Class prep
C Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15526 chars)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

C - Chitraketu (14-19)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Cursed

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Cursed Chapter 17 Along with seeing the Lord, Chitraketu was also benedicted with rulership over the Vidyadhara planet. As he enjoyed in that realm, travelling from place-toplace, he once encountered Lord Siva publicly embracing Parvati, surrounded by an august assembly of Siddhas, Caranas and great sages. Chitraketu was astonished by the sight and laughed loudly, much to the disapproval of Parvati. There was no offensive intention since Chitraketu was simply exhibiting his amazement at Lord Siva’s aloofness. Nevertheless, Parvati, entirely unimpressed by his reaction, cursed him to become a demon. Chitraketu humbly accepted it without protest. Devotees, Siva said, never fear any condition of life – heaven, hell or liberation are all the same since their only aspiration is to serve the Lord. Chitraketu thus became the ‘demon’ Vritrasura in his next life.

Previous Chitraketu Enlightened Next Diti, Indra and the Maruts Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Enlightened

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Enlightened Chapter 15, 16 The two sages instructed Chitraketu in the harsh realities of life; all relationships of this world are temporary, and the material designations we assume are ultimately imaginary. The illuminating knowledge empowered Chitraketu to gain a broader perspective. Being eager for more, Narada guided Chitraketu in cultivating an internal detachment and gave him a mantra to chant. Then, by his mystic potency, Narada empowered the child to speak words of wisdom which further highlighted the transitory nature of everything in this world. The funeral ceremony was performed and the envious queens were so ashamed of their conduct that they gave up the aspiration to have children. The sages departed and Chitraketu dedicated himself to reciting the mantra given to him by Narada. Within days he was able to have the direct vision of Lord Sesa, and he overflowed with gratitude. Pleased by his prayers, the Supreme Lord explained further knowledge of Himself to Chitraketu.

Previous Chitraketu’s Lamentation Next Chitraketu Cursed Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu’s Lamentation

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu’s Lamentation Chapter 14 When Maharaja Pariksit enquired how a demon could possess such exalted consciousness, Sukadeva Goswami described Vritrasura’s previous birth as Chitraketu. Despite marrying ten million wives, Chitraketu had no children. When the great sage Angira Rishi visited, Chitraketu warmly received him. He frankly expressed his dissatisfaction to the sage, who mercifully arranged for his first wife, Krtadyuti, to have a son. There was, however, a caveat – he predicted the child would bring both happiness ( harsa ) and lamentation ( soka ). Upon the birth of this son, Chitraketu and all the citizens were overjoyed. His dream had finally been fulfilled! The other wives, however, didn’t share that joy, feeling neglected and sidelined by their husband. Clouded by envy and overcome by selfishness, they administered poison to the child and mercilessly killed him. Krtadyuti fainted in shock, the inhabitants of the palace were in tears and Chitraketu practically lost all consciousness! The mother condemned the cruel acts of providence and begged her child to wake up, but it was futile. Understanding their pain, the sages Narada and Angira arrived on the scene to offer enlightening words.

Previous C - Chitraketu (14-19) Next Chitraketu Enlightened Last updated 1 year ago

Diti, Indra and the Maruts

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Diti, Indra and the Maruts Chapter 18, 19 Sukadeva Goswami continued describing the descendants of Daksa’s daughters, particularly Diti (mother of the demons) and Aditi (mother of the demigods). Those offspring became known as the Daityas and Adityas respectively. Diti had a grudge against Indra since Vishnu had appeared to save him by killing her sons, Hiranyaksa and Hiranyakasipu. Angered, she now desired another son who would kill Indra. Through her womanly charm she conquered Kasyapa, her husband, who agreed to unite with her. When she expressed what kind of child she wanted, however, he was shocked and condemned himself. Nevertheless, Kasyapa ingeniously instructed Diti to strictly follow the Vaisnava austerity of Pumsavana-vrata. This would satisfy her desire for a son, but simultaneously purify her consciousness from the enmity towards Indra and the demigods. While Diti engaged in the vow ( vrata ), Indra closely monitored her every move, looking for some discrepancy to capitalise upon. When Indra caught her in violation of the strict regulations, he entered her womb and sliced the embryo into forty-nine parts. Those children became known as the Maruts, who later made friends with Indra and were saved. Upon the request of Maharaja Pariksit, Sukadeva Goswami went on to explain the details of the Pumsavana-vrata.

Previous Chitraketu Cursed Next River of Names Last updated 1 year ago

River of Names

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names “The instructions given by Narada and Angira Muni are the true spiritual instructions for the illusioned conditioned soul. This world is temporary, but because of our previous karma we come here and accept bodies, creating temporary relationships in terms of society, friendship, love, nationality and community, which are all finished at death. These temporary relationships did not exist in the past, nor will they exist in the future. Therefore, at the present moment the so-called relationships are illusions.” (SB 6.15.2) When Maharaja Chitraketu was overwhelmed by lamentation at the sudden death of his beloved son, he received a series of transcendental instructions. Firstly, the great sages Narada and Angira came and reminded Chitraketu about the body, soul, inevitable death and the subsequent transmigration that everyone will experience. Later, Chitraketu’s son came back to life and spoke to the King, quite bluntly stating: “In which birth were these individuals my mother and father? No one is actually my mother and father. How can I accept these two people as my parents?” Later, after absorbing himself in prayer, Chitraketu was further enlightened in transcendental knowledge by the Supreme Lord Himself. At every stage he received powerful insights to elevate his consciousness and bring perspective to the situation he was facing. The Srimad-Bhagavatam offers a series of interesting analogies to describe the transitory nature of relationships in this material world: Tourists meeting in a hotel: “Thereafter, Devayani, the daughter of Sukracarya, understood that the materialistic association of husband, friends and relatives is like the association in a hotel full of tourists. The relationships of society, friendship and love are created by the maya of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, exactly as in a dream.” (SB 9.19.27-28) Travellers in a restaurant: “My dear mother, in a restaurant or place for drinking cold water, many travellers are brought together, and after drinking water they continue to their respective destinations. Similarly, living entities join together in a family, and later, as a result of their own actions, they are led apart to their destinations.” (SB 7.2.21) Sticks meeting in the river: “Many planks and sticks, unable to stay together, are carried away by the force of a river’s waves. Similarly, although we are intimately related with friends and family members, we are unable to stay together because of our varied past deeds and the waves of time.” (SB 10.5.25) Fallible Soldiers in an army: “Persons devoid of atma-tattva do not enquire into the problems of life, being too attached to the fallible soldiers like the body, children and wife. Although sufficiently experienced, they still do not see their inevitable destruction.” (SB 2.1.4) Dreams that will end: “In a dream we form a society of friendship and love, and when we awaken we see that it has ceased to exist. Similarly, one’s gross society, family and love are also a dream, and this dream will be over as soon as one dies. Therefore, whether one is dreaming in a subtle way or a gross way, these dreams are all false and temporary.” (SB 7.14.3-4) Elements scattered by the wind: “Just as the wind brings together masses of clouds, blades of grass, wisps of cotton and particles of dust, only to scatter them all again, so the creator deals with His created beings in the same way.” (SB 10.82.43) In a conversation with Dhritarastra, Akrura concludes: “In this world no one has any permanent relationship with anyone else, O King. We cannot stay forever even with our own body, what to speak of our wife, children and the rest. Every creature is born alone and dies alone, and alone one experiences the just rewards of his good and evil deeds.” (SB 10.49.20-21) So how do we mediate the relationships of this world? Are all of our connections ultimately meaningless and simply a waste of time?

Previous Diti, Indra and the Maruts Next Attention vs Attachment Last updated 1 year ago

Attention vs Attachment

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Attention vs Attachment Without genuinely investing in relationships, situations and aspirations, how can we make any real progress in those areas? Where the attention goes, energy flows and results invariably show. Simultaneously, however, wisdom teachers constantly remind us to remain detached and aloof; everything in this world is a fleeting reality destined for destruction at the ruthless hands of time. In ultimate reality, we are building castles in the sand. So what’s the balance? When does genuine concern and responsibility evolve into an unhealthy attachment? How can we identify the extremes of over-zealous endeavour and irresponsible aloofness? Is it possible to cultivate a spiritually elevated consciousness whilst sensitively navigating day-to-day realities and responsibilities? The Srimad-Bhagavatam makes a clear distinction between being attentive and being attached. Every spiritual practitioner should know how to strike the balance and avoid overstepping the line. Intelligence vs Emotion (The Driver) – an attentive person is driven to act by spiritual intelligence, clearly understanding the broader need and purpose behind their endeavour. An attached person, however, is driven by fleeting emotions and is therefore flickering in effort and determination. It’s not that an attentive person is not passionate or emotionally involved, but every endeavour is founded upon wisdom and knowledge. Are you driven by intelligence or emotion? Endeavour vs Result (The Success) – an attentive person invests energy in crafting a perfect endeavour, doing everything within their control to make the best attempt possible. This is their measure of success. An attached person, however, evaluates success based on the outcome and result. An attentive person is not indifferent to the results, but simply uses them to understand how they can refine and improve their endeavour. Are you concerned about giving your best or achieving the best? Eternal vs Temporary (The Vision) – an attentive person is always awake to the backdrop of spiritual reality, though living and functioning in the ‘real’ world. An attached person, however, engrossed and entangled in their vision of this temporary life, is rendered oblivious to the ‘bigger picture.’ Attentive people are undoubtedly practical, but simultaneously transcendental. How many of your desires, decisions and directions are formulated with reference to the ultimate purpose of life?

Previous River of Names Next Transcendental Affection Last updated 1 year ago

Transcendental Affection

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Transcendental Affection In the First Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam we find the striking prayers of Queen Kunti. With regards to family attachments, she prays: “O Lord of the universe, soul of the universe, O personality of the form of the universe, please, therefore, sever my tie of affection for my kinsmen, the Pandavas and the Vrsnis. O Lord of Madhu, as the Ganges forever flows to the sea without hindrance, let my attraction be constantly drawn unto You without being diverted to anyone else.” ( SB 1.8.41 - 42 ) In the purport, Srila Prabhupada clarifies how affection cannot be annihilated, but must be redirected in a spiritual way: “Perfection of pure devotional service is attained when all attention is diverted towards the transcendental loving service of the Lord. To cut off the tie of all other affections does not mean complete negation of the finer elements, like affection for someone else. This is not possible. A living being, whoever he may be, must have this feeling of affection for others because this is a symptom of life… The so-called affection for family, society, country, etc., consists of different phases of sense gratification. When this desire is changed for the satisfaction of the Lord, it is called devotional service.” (SB 1.8.42) But we may still wonder why Queen Kunti’s affection for her family members, who were all Krishna’s devotees, is problematic. Srila Prabhupada further clarifies: “Her affection for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis is not out of the range of devotional service because the service of the Lord and the service of the devotees are identical. Sometimes service to the devotee is more valuable than service to the Lord. But here the affection of Kuntidevi for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis was due to family relation. This tie of affection in terms of material relation is the relation of maya because the relations of the body or the mind are due to the influence of the external energy. Relations of the soul, established in relation with the Supreme Soul, are factual relations. When Kuntidevi wanted to cut off the family relation, she meant to cut off the relation of the skin. The skin relation is the cause of material bondage, but the relation of the soul is the cause of freedom.” (SB 1.8.42)

Previous Attention vs Attachment Next O.P.E.N Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.1

↗
श्रीबादरायणिरुवाच अथ देवऋषी राजन् सम्परेतं नृपात्मजम् । दर्शयित्वेति होवाच ज्ञातीनामनुशोचताम् ॥ १ ॥
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
[shree-baadaraayanir uvaacha]
atha deva-ṛṣī rājan
[atha deva-rishee raajan]
samparetaṁ nṛpātmajam
[samparetam nripaatmajam]
darśayitveti hovāca
[darshayitveti hovaacha]
jñātīnām anuśocatām
[jnaateenaam anushochataam]
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said atha — thus deva-ṛṣiḥ — the great sage Nārada rājan — O King samparetam — dead nṛpa-ātmajam — the son of the King darśayitvā — making visible iti — thus ha — indeed uvāca — explained jñātīnām — to all the relatives anuśocatām — who were lamenting.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
atha deva-ṛṣī rājan
atha
thus
deva-ṛṣiḥ
the great sage Nārada
rājan
O King
samparetaṁ nṛpātmajam
samparetam
dead
nṛpa-ātmajam
the son of the King
darśayitveti hovāca
darśayitvā
making visible
iti
thus
ha
indeed
uvāca
explained
jñātīnām anuśocatām
jñātīnām
to all the relatives
anuśocatām
who were lamenting.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: My dear King Parīkṣit, by his mystic power the great sage Nārada brought the dead son into the vision of all the lamenting relatives and then spoke as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O King! Nārada brought the dead son into the vision of all the lamenting relatives and then spoke as follows. In the Sixteenth Chapter, Citraketu is enlightened by the words of his dead son, receives a mantra from Nārada, praises Saṅkarṣaṇa and receives knowledge from Saṅkarṣaṇa. Jñātīnām has an accusative meaning (Nārada showed the lamenting relatives).
By his mystic power Nārada brought the dead son's soul into the relatives' vision and spoke. Sometimes the rescue is not to undo death but to let the bereaved hear from the one who died.
Reflection Questions
  • What would I want to hear from someone I have lost?
  • Have I considered that a teaching may arrive through them rather than only about them?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.2

↗
श्रीनारद उवाच जीवात्मन् पश्य भद्रं ते मातरं पितरं च ते । सुहृदो बान्धवास्तप्ता: शुचा त्वत्कृतया भृशम् ॥ २ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
jīvātman paśya bhadraṁ te
[jeevaatman pashya bhadram te]
mātaraṁ pitaraṁ ca te
[maataram pitaram cha te]
suhṛdo bāndhavās taptāḥ
[suhrido baandhavaas taptaah]
śucā tvat-kṛtayā bhṛśam
[shuchaa tvat-kritayaa bhrisham]
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada Muni said jīva-ātman — O living entity paśya — just see bhadram — good fortune te — unto you mātaram — the mother pitaram — the father ca — and te — of you suhṛdaḥ — friends bāndhavāḥ — relatives taptāḥ — aggrieved śucā — by lamentation tvat-kṛtayā — because of you bhṛśam — very greatly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada Muni said
jīvātman paśya bhadraṁ te
jīva-ātman
O living entity
paśya
just see
bhadram
good fortune
te
unto you
mātaraṁ pitaraṁ ca te
mātaram
the mother
pitaram
the father
ca
and
te
of you
suhṛdo bāndhavās taptāḥ
suhṛdaḥ
friends
bāndhavāḥ
relatives
taptāḥ
aggrieved
śucā tvat-kṛtayā bhṛśam
śucā
by lamentation
tvat-kṛtayā
because of you
bhṛśam
very greatly.
Śrī Nārada Muni said: O living entity, all good fortune unto you. Just see your father and mother. All your friends and relatives are overwhelmed with grief because of your passing away.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: O living entity! All good fortune unto you! Just see your father and mother. All your friends and relatives are overwhelmed with grief because of your passing away. Seeing that it was difficult to stop the lamentation and illusion, Nārada spoke through the son to enlighten them. Śucā means because of grief.
O living entity, all good fortune to you — see how your father, mother and friends are overwhelmed by grief at your passing. Nārada invites the soul to look at the wreckage left behind.
Reflection Questions
  • What would I see if I looked at the wreckage my eventual death will leave?
  • How might that view reshape my present caring?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.3

↗
कलेवरं स्वमाविश्य शेषमायु: सुहृद्‌वृत: । भुङ्‌क्ष्व भोगान् पितृप्रत्तानधितिष्ठ नृपासनम् ॥ ३ ॥
kalevaraṁ svam āviśya
[kalevaram svam aavishya]
śeṣam āyuḥ suhṛd-vṛtaḥ
[shesham aayuh suhrid-vritah]
bhuṅkṣva bhogān pitṛ-prattān
[bhunkshva bhogaan pitri-prattaan]
adhitiṣṭha nṛpāsanam
[adhitishtha nripaasanam]
kalevaram — body svam — your own āviśya — entering śeṣam — the balance āyuḥ — duration of life suhṛt-vṛtaḥ — surrounded by your friends and relatives bhuṅkṣva — just enjoy bhogān — all enjoyable opulences pitṛ — by your father prattān — awarded adhitiṣṭha — accept nṛpa-āsanam — the throne of the king.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kalevaraṁ svam āviśya
kalevaram
body
svam
your own
āviśya
entering
śeṣam āyuḥ suhṛd-vṛtaḥ
śeṣam
the balance
āyuḥ
duration of life
suhṛt-vṛtaḥ
surrounded by your friends and relatives
bhuṅkṣva bhogān pitṛ-prattān
bhuṅkṣva
just enjoy
bhogān
all enjoyable opulences
pitṛ
by your father
prattān
awarded
adhitiṣṭha nṛpāsanam
adhitiṣṭha
accept
nṛpa-āsanam
the throne of the king.
Because you died untimely, the balance of your lifetime still remains. Therefore you may reenter your body and enjoy the remainder of your life, surrounded by your friends and relatives. Accept the royal throne and all the opulences given by your father.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Reenter your body and enjoy the remainder of your life, surrounded by your friends and relatives. Accept the royal throne and all the enjoyments given by your father. Because you did not die at the proper time you have the remainder of your life to live. Nārada is fooling the King. Actually he did not have a remainder to live, since this body was illusory. Pitṛ-prattān means “given by the father.”
Because you died untimely, balance of life remains — reenter the body and enjoy the throne and royal opulence. The sage offers a literal reversal as a teaching device.
Reflection Questions
  • If offered to return to a life I had let go, would I take it back?
  • What does my answer reveal about how much I am identified with the role?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.4

↗
जीव उवाच कस्मिञ्जन्मन्यमी मह्यं पितरो मातरोऽभवन् । कर्मभिर्भ्राम्यमाणस्य देवतिर्यङ्‌नृयोनिषु ॥ ४ ॥
jīva uvāca
[jeeva uvaacha]
kasmiṣ janmany amī mahyaṁ
[kasmish janmany amee mahyam]
pitaro mātaro ’bhavan
[pitaro maataro ’bhavan]
karmabhir bhrāmyamāṇasya
[karmabhir bhraamyamaanasya]
deva-tiryaṅ-nṛ-yoniṣu
[deva-tiryan-nri-yonishu]
jīvaḥ uvāca — the living entity said kasmin — in which janmani — birth amī — all those mahyam — to me pitaraḥ — fathers mātaraḥ — mothers abhavan — were karmabhiḥ — by the results of fruitive action bhrāmyamāṇasya — who am wandering deva-tiryak — of the demigods and the lower animals nṛ — and of the human species yoniṣu — in the wombs.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jīva uvāca
jīvaḥ uvāca
the living entity said
kasmiṣ janmany amī mahyaṁ
kasmin
in which
janmani
birth
amī
all those
mahyam
to me
pitaro mātaro ’bhavan
pitaraḥ
fathers
mātaraḥ
mothers
karmabhir bhrāmyamāṇasya
abhavan
were
karmabhiḥ
by the results of fruitive action
bhrāmyamāṇasya
who am wandering
deva-tiryaṅ-nṛ-yoniṣu
deva-tiryak
of the demigods and the lower animals
nṛ
and of the human species
yoniṣu
in the wombs.
By the mystic power of Nārada Muni, the living entity reentered his dead body for a short time and spoke in reply to Nārada Muni’s request. He said: According to the results of my fruitive activities, I, the living being, transmigrate from one body to another, sometimes going to the species of the demigods, sometimes to the species of lower animals, sometimes among the vegetables, and sometimes to the human species. Therefore, in which birth were these my mother and father? No one is actually my mother and father. How can I accept these two people as my parents?

Here it is made clear that the living being enters a material body that is like a machine created by the five gross elements of material nature (earth, water, fire, air and sky) and the three subtle elements (mind, intelligence and ego). As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, there are two separate identities, called the inferior and superior natures, which both belong to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. According to the results of a living entity’s fruitive actions, he is forced to enter the material elements in different types of bodies.

This time the living entity was supposed to have been the son of Mahārāja Citraketu and Queen Kṛtadyuti because according to the laws of nature he had entered a body made by the King and Queen. Actually, however, he was not their son. The living entity is the son of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and because he wants to enjoy this material world, the Supreme Lord gives him a chance to enter various bodies. The living entity has no true relationship with the material body he gets from his material father and mother. He is part and parcel of the Supreme Lord, but he is allowed to go through different bodies. The body created by the so-called father and mother actually has nothing to do with its so-called creators. Therefore the living entity flatly denied that Mahārāja Citraketu and his wife were his father and mother.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva said: Since I have been wandering by karma in wombs of devatās, animals and humans, in which birth were these persons my father and mother? The sage, entering that body, then spoke as if the child had come to life. Mahyam should be mama, the possessive case.
Reentering briefly, the living entity replies: by karma I transmigrate from one body to another, sometimes among demigods, animals, humans. Whose son am I really, then?
Reflection Questions
  • Whose son or daughter am I most invested in being? Whose, am I forgetting?
  • What does multi-life identity do to my single-life loyalties?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.5

↗
बन्धुज्ञात्यरिमध्यस्थमित्रोदासीनविद्विष: । सर्व एव हि सर्वेषां भवन्ति क्रमशो मिथ: ॥ ५ ॥
bandhu-jñāty-ari-madhyastha-
[bandhu-jnaaty-ari-madhyastha-]
mitrodāsīna-vidviṣaḥ
[mitrodaaseena-vidvishah]
sarva eva hi sarveṣāṁ
[sarva eva hi sarveshaam]
bhavanti kramaśo mithaḥ
[bhavanti kramasho mithah]
bandhu — friends jñāti — family members ari — enemies madhyastha — neutrals mitra — well-wishers udāsīna — indifferent vidviṣaḥ — or envious persons sarve — all eva — indeed hi — certainly sarveṣām — of all bhavanti — become kramaśaḥ — gradually mithaḥ — of one another.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bandhu-jñāty-ari-madhyastha-
bandhu
friends
jñāti
family members
ari
enemies
madhyastha
neutrals
mitrodāsīna-vidviṣaḥ
mitra
well-wishers
udāsīna
indifferent
vidviṣaḥ
or envious persons
sarva eva hi sarveṣāṁ
sarve
all
eva
indeed
hi
certainly
sarveṣām
of all
bhavanti kramaśo mithaḥ
bhavanti
become
kramaśaḥ
gradually
mithaḥ
of one another.
In this material world, which advances like a river that carries away the living entity, all people become friends, relatives and enemies in due course of time. They also act neutrally, they mediate, they despise one another, and they act in many other relationships. Nonetheless, despite these various transactions, no one is permanently related.

It is our practical experience in this material world that the same person who is one’s friend today becomes one’s enemy tomorrow. Our relationships as friends or enemies, family men or outsiders, are actually the results of our different dealings. Citraketu Mahārāja was lamenting for his son, who was now dead, but he could have considered the situation otherwise. “This living entity,” he could have thought, “was my enemy in my last life, and now, having appeared as my son, he is prematurely leaving just to give me pain and agony.” Why should he not consider his dead son his former enemy and instead of lamenting be jubilant because of an enemy’s death? As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (3.27) , prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ: factually everything is happening because of our association with the modes of material nature. Therefore one who is my friend today in association with the mode of goodness may be my enemy tomorrow in association with the modes of passion and ignorance. As the modes of material nature work, in illusion we accept others as friends, enemies, sons or fathers in terms of the reactions of different dealings under different conditions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One person becomes a relative through marriage, a relative of one’s father, an enemy, a false friend, a well-wisher, and becomes indifferent to or envious of another person in different successive births. When I die, seeing me as a son, you lament. But why do you not see me as an enemy, and rejoice when I die, since all these relationships are temporary? That is expressed in this verse. Bandhu are kinsmen through marriage. Jñāti is a paternal relative. Enemies are those who attack. Mitra is a person desiring one’s good fortune. Madhyastha is externally friendly and internally inimical. Udāṣina is a person who is neither friendly nor inimical. Vidviṣa is a person who cannot tolerate another’s superiority. The enemy in one life becomes the son in another life. It is a common saying that a son with good qualities who dies is actually an enemy, since he gives greater sorrow.
In this world friends, relatives, enemies, mediators arise and shift in time. The current configuration is one slide in a long deck.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose role in my life has rotated through several categories already?
  • Where am I treating a current category as final?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.6

↗
यथा वस्तूनि पण्यानि हेमादीनि ततस्तत: । पर्यटन्ति नरेष्वेवं जीवो योनिषु कर्तृषु ॥ ६ ॥
yathā vastūni paṇyāni
[yathaa vastooni panyaani]
hemādīni tatas tataḥ
[hemaadeeni tatas tatah]
paryaṭanti nareṣv evaṁ
[paryatanti nareshv evam]
jīvo yoniṣu kartṛṣu
[jeevo yonishu kartrishu]
yathā — just as vastūni — commodities paṇyāni — meant for trading hema-ādīni — such as gold tataḥ tataḥ — from here to there paryaṭanti — move about nareṣu — among men evam — in this way jīvaḥ — the living entity yoniṣu — in different species of life kartṛṣu — in different material fathers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā vastūni paṇyāni
yathā
just as
vastūni
commodities
paṇyāni
meant for trading
hemādīni tatas tataḥ
hema-ādīni
such as gold
tataḥ tataḥ
from here to there
paryaṭanti nareṣv evaṁ
paryaṭanti
move about
nareṣu
among men
evam
in this way
jīvo yoniṣu kartṛṣu
jīvaḥ
the living entity
yoniṣu
in different species of life
kartṛṣu
in different material fathers.
Just as gold and other commodities are continually transferred from one place to another in due course of purchase and sale, so the living entity, as a result of his fruitive activities, wanders throughout the entire universe, being injected into various bodies in different species of life by one kind of father after another.

It has already been explained that Citraketu’s son was his enemy in a past life and had now appeared as his son just to give him more severe pain. Indeed, the untimely death of the son caused severe lamentation for the father. One may put forward the argument, “If the King’s son was his enemy, how could the King have so much affection for him?” In answer, the example is given that when someone’s wealth falls into the hands of his enemy, the money becomes the enemy’s friend. Then the enemy can use it for his own purposes. Indeed, he can even use it to harm its previous owner. Therefore the money belongs neither to the one party nor to the other. The money is always money, but in different situations it can be used as an enemy or a friend.

As explained in Bhagavad-gītā, it is not by any father or mother that the living entity is given his birth. The living entity is a completely separate identity from the so-called father and mother. By the laws of nature, the living entity is forced to enter the semen of a father and be injected into the womb of the mother. He is not in control of selecting what kind of father he will accept. Prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni: the laws of nature force him to go to different fathers and mothers, just like a consumer commodity that is purchased and sold. Therefore the so-called relationship of father and son is an arrangement of prakṛti, or nature. It has no meaning, and therefore it is called illusion.

The same living entity sometimes takes shelter of an animal father and mother and sometimes a human father and mother. Sometimes he accepts a father and mother among the birds, and sometimes he accepts a demigod father and mother. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore says:

brahmāṇḍa bhramite kona bhāgyavān jīva guru-kṛṣṇa-prasāde pāya bhakti-latā-bīja

Harassed life after life by the laws of nature, the living entity wanders throughout the entire universe in different planets and different species of life. Somehow or other, if he is fortunate enough, he comes in touch with a devotee who reforms his entire life. Then the living entity goes back home, back to Godhead. Therefore it is said:

janame janame sabe pitā mātā pāya kṛṣṇa guru nahi mile baja hari ei

In the transmigration of the soul through different bodies, everyone, in every form of life — be it human, animal, tree or demigod — gets a father and mother. This is not very difficult. The difficulty is to obtain a bona fide spiritual master and Kṛṣṇa. Therefore the duty of a human being is to capture the opportunity to come in touch with Kṛṣṇa’s representative, the bona fide spiritual master. Under the guidance of the spiritual master, the spiritual father, one can return home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as commodities and coins pass among many people, the jīva wanders into various wombs with various fathers and mothers. “If an enemy becomes one’s son, how does affection arise for that person as a dear relative?” This is explained through an example. Panyāni means commodities. Hemādīni means gold coins. Gold coins in an enemy’s house are the cause of his murder. By chance those same gold coins come to one’s own house and become the object of affection and are used for enjoyment. In this way the jīva enters into wombs of men, cows, or donkeys, having various fathers and mothers.
As gold passes through buyer after buyer, the living entity, by karma, is injected into one body after another. The metaphor strips ownership: we don't own bodies; we pass through them.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I treated my body as my permanent possession rather than current location?
  • What changes when I see the body as something I am passing through?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.7

↗
नित्यस्यार्थस्य सम्बन्धो ह्यनित्यो द‍ृश्यते नृषु । यावद्यस्य हि सम्बन्धो ममत्वं तावदेव हि ॥ ७ ॥
nityasyārthasya sambandho
[nityasyaarthasya sambandho]
hy anityo dṛśyate nṛṣu
[hy anityo drishyate nrishu]
yāvad yasya hi sambandho
[yaavad yasya hi sambandho]
mamatvaṁ tāvad eva hi
[mamatvam taavad eva hi]
nityasya — of the eternal arthasya — thing sambandhaḥ — relationship hi — indeed anityaḥ — temporary dṛśyate — is seen nṛṣu — in human society yāvat — as long as yasya — of whom hi — indeed sambandhaḥ — relationship mamatvam — ownership tāvat — that long eva — indeed hi — certainly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nityasyārthasya sambandho
nityasya
of the eternal
arthasya
thing
sambandhaḥ
relationship
hy anityo dṛśyate nṛṣu
yāvad yasya hi sambandho
hi
indeed
anityaḥ
temporary
dṛśyate
is seen
nṛṣu
in human society
yāvat
as long as
yasya
of whom
mamatvaṁ tāvad eva hi
hi
indeed
sambandhaḥ
relationship
mamatvam
ownership
tāvat
that long
eva
indeed
hi
certainly.
A few living entities are born in the human species, and others are born as animals. Although both are living entities, their relationships are impermanent. An animal may remain in the custody of a human being for some time, and then the same animal may be transferred to the possession of other human beings. As soon as the animal goes away, the former proprietor no longer has a sense of ownership. As long as the animal is in his possession he certainly has an affinity for it, but as soon as the animal is sold, the affinity is lost.

Aside from the fact that the soul transmigrates from one body to another, even in this life the relationships between living entities are impermanent, as exemplified in this verse. The son of Citraketu was named Harṣaśoka, or “jubilation and lamentation.” The living entity is certainly eternal, but because he is covered by a temporary dress, the body, his eternity is not observed. Dehino ’smin yathā dehe kaumāraṁ yauvanaṁ jarā: “The embodied soul continually passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age.” Thus the bodily dress is impermanent. The living entity, however, is permanent. As an animal is transferred from one owner to another, the living entity who was the son of Citraketu lived as his son for some time, but as soon as he was transferred to another body, the affectionate relationship was broken. As stated in the example given in the previous verse, when one has a commodity in his hands he considers it his, but as soon as it is transferred it becomes someone else’s commodity. Then one no longer has a relationship with it; he has no affection for it, nor does he lament for it.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
It is seen that the relationships of one object with many people are temporary. As long as the relationship lasts, one has possessiveness of the object. For some time I was the son of Citraketu and for that time he showed affection for me. Afterwards I will be the son of someone else, and that person will show affection for me. This is illustrated by making a particular case to make a general statement. One object like a coin goes to another person’s hand in one day during trading. Then it becomes his and no one else’s for some time. The relationship is temporary.
A few are born human, others as animals — both are living entities, but their relationships are impermanent; an animal-and-human bond may briefly arise. Cross-species and cross-class relationships are as real and as fleeting.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'unequal' relationship have I underestimated as a real relationship?
  • How might temporariness inform tenderness?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.8

↗
एवं योनिगतो जीव: स नित्यो निरहङ्‌कृत: । यावद्यत्रोपलभ्येत तावत्स्वत्वं हि तस्य तत् ॥ ८ ॥
evaṁ yoni-gato jīvaḥ
[evam yoni-gato jeevah]
sa nityo nirahaṅkṛtaḥ
[sa nityo nirahankritah]
yāvad yatropalabhyeta
[yaavad yatropalabhyeta]
tāvat svatvaṁ hi tasya tat
[taavat svatvam hi tasya tat]
evam — thus yoni-gataḥ — being within a specific species of life jīvaḥ — the living entity saḥ — he nityaḥ — eternal nirahaṅkṛtaḥ — without identification with the body yāvat — as long as yatra — where upalabhyeta — he may be found tāvat — that long svatvam — the concept of self hi — indeed tasya — of him tat — that.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ yoni-gato jīvaḥ
evam
thus
yoni-gataḥ
being within a specific species of life
jīvaḥ
the living entity
sa nityo nirahaṅkṛtaḥ
saḥ
he
nityaḥ
eternal
nirahaṅkṛtaḥ
without identification with the body
yāvad yatropalabhyeta
yāvat
as long as
yatra
where
upalabhyeta
he may be found
tāvat
that long
tāvat svatvaṁ hi tasya tat
svatvam
the concept of self
hi
indeed
tasya
of him
tat
that.
Even though one living entity becomes connected with another because of a relationship based on bodies that are perishable, the living entity is eternal. Actually it is the body that is born or lost, not the living entity. One should not accept that the living entity takes birth or dies. The living being actually has no relationship with so-called fathers and mothers. As long as he appears as the son of a certain father and mother as a result of his past fruitive activities, he has a connection with the body given by that father and mother. Thus he falsely accepts himself as their son and acts affectionately. After he dies, however, the relationship is finished. Under these circumstances, one should not be falsely involved with jubilation and lamentation.

When the living entity lives within the material body, he falsely thinks that he is the body, although actually he is not. His relationship with his body and his so-called father and mother are false, illusory conceptions. These illusions continue as long as one is not enlightened about the situation of the living entity.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva who has entered a body is actually without specific material identity. As long as the jīva stays in his body he identifies himself as the son of a particular father. Actually the soul has no material identity. As long as he attains a body with a father (yatra), he thinks himself his son (tasya). Or, though the jīva is without identity, as long as it is in some body (yatra) the jīva (tasya) identifies himself with that body. How can I have false identity since I do not identify with that body any more? Therefore it is not proper to tell me to reenter the body.
Bodily relationships are perishable; the living entity is eternal. One should not accept the perishable bond as if it were intrinsic. Loving the body while it lasts is fine; identifying as the body's relation is the error.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my loving has slid from love into identification?
  • Could I love through the relation without becoming the relation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.9

↗
एष नित्योऽव्यय: सूक्ष्म एष सर्वाश्रय: स्वद‍ृक् । आत्ममायागुणैर्विश्वमात्मानं सृजते प्रभु: ॥ ९ ॥
eṣa nityo ’vyayaḥ sūkṣma
[esha nityo ’vyayah sookshma]
eṣa sarvāśrayaḥ svadṛk
[esha sarvaashrayah svadrik]
ātmamāyā-guṇair viśvam
[aatmamaayaa-gunair vishvam]
ātmānaṁ sṛjate prabhuḥ
[aatmaanam srijate prabhuh]
eṣaḥ — this living entity nityaḥ — eternal avyayaḥ — imperishable sūkṣmaḥ — very, very fine (not seen by the material eyes) eṣaḥ — this living entity sarva-āśrayaḥ — the cause of different types of bodies sva-dṛk — self-effulgent ātma-māyā-guṇaiḥ — by the Supreme Personality of Godhead’s modes of material nature viśvam — this material world ātmānam — himself sṛjate — appears prabhuḥ — the master.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣa nityo ’vyayaḥ sūkṣma
eṣaḥ
this living entity
nityaḥ
eternal
avyayaḥ
imperishable
sūkṣmaḥ
very, very fine (not seen by the material eyes)
eṣa sarvāśrayaḥ svadṛk
eṣaḥ
this living entity
sarva-āśrayaḥ
the cause of different types of bodies
sva-dṛk
self-effulgent
ātmamāyā-guṇair viśvam
ātma-māyā-guṇaiḥ
by the Supreme Personality of Godhead’s modes of material nature
viśvam
this material world
ātmānaṁ sṛjate prabhuḥ
ātmānam
himself
sṛjate
appears
prabhuḥ
the master.
The living entity is eternal and imperishable because he actually has no beginning and no end. He never takes birth or dies. He is the basic principle of all types of bodies, yet he does not belong to the bodily category. The living being is so sublime that he is equal in quality to the Supreme Lord. Nonetheless, because he is extremely small, he is prone to be illusioned by the external energy, and thus he creates various bodies for himself according to his different desires.

In this verse the philosophy of acintya-bhedābheda — simultaneous oneness and difference — is described. The living entity is eternal ( nitya ) like the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but the difference is that the Supreme Lord is the greatest, no one being equal to or greater than Him, whereas the living entity is sūkṣma, or extremely small. The śāstra describes that the magnitude of the living entity is one ten-thousandth the size of the tip of a hair. The Supreme Lord is all-pervading ( aṇḍāntara-stha-paramāṇu-cayāntara-stham ). Relatively, if the living entity is accepted as the smallest, there should naturally be inquiry about the greatest. The greatest is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and the smallest is the living entity.

Another peculiar characteristic of the jīva is that he becomes covered by māyā. Ātmamāyā-guṇaiḥ: he is prone to being covered by the Supreme Lord’s illusory energy. The living entity is responsible for his conditional life in the material world, and therefore he is described as prabhu (“the master”). If he likes he can come to this material world, and if he likes he can return home, back to Godhead. Because he wanted to enjoy this material world, the Supreme Personality of Godhead gave him a material body through the agency of the material energy. As the Lord Himself says in Bhagavad-gītā (18.61) :

īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe ’rjuna tiṣṭhati bhrāmayan sarva-bhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā

“The Supreme Lord is situated in everyone’s heart, O Arjuna, and is directing the wanderings of all living entities, who are seated as on a machine, made of the material energy.” The Supreme Lord gives the living entity a chance to enjoy in this material world as he desires, but He openly expresses His own desire that the living entity give up all material aspirations, fully surrender unto Him and return home, back to Godhead.

The living entity is the smallest ( sūkṣma ). Jīva Gosvāmī says in this connection that the living entity within the body is extremely difficult for materialistic scientists to find, although we understand from authorities that the living entity is within the body. The body is different from the living entity.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord is eternal, without change, beyond perception. He is the shelter of all things and self-manifesting. The Lord creates himself as the universe through the guṇas of his material māyā. Since the jīva is dependent and powerless, there must be an independent controller. What is he like? Since the jīva is covered by māyā, and the Lord is thus invisible, though he can also be seen, the Lord is described as tat, Brahman. Because the speaker Aṅgirā is not covered by māyā, being free from ignorance as a jīvanmukta, he is able to use words to describe this Brahman as a perceivable object. The Lord is described by three terms which are used in relation to the jīva as well: eternal, unchanging, and subtle. The jīva has been described by two terms not common to the Lord: dependent and without control--powerless. Other qualities are next mentioned to show the qualities unique to the Lord such as being the shelter of all things. The universe is called himself because it arises from his śakti, which is non-different from him.
The living entity is eternal, beginningless, endless; never born, never dying; basic principle of every body type, yet beyond bodily category. Self-knowledge corrects all relational confusion.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I missing the soul behind the body I face?
  • What practice trains the perception of the eternal in the perishable?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.10

↗
न ह्यस्यास्ति प्रिय: कश्चिन्नाप्रिय: स्व: परोऽपि वा । एक: सर्वधियां द्रष्टा कर्तृणां गुणदोषयो: ॥ १० ॥
na hy asyāsti priyaḥ kaścin
[na hy asyaasti priyah kashchin]
nāpriyaḥ svaḥ paro ’pi vā
[naapriyah svah paro ’pi vaa]
ekaḥ sarva-dhiyāṁ draṣṭā
[ekah sarva-dhiyaam drashtaa]
kartṝṇāṁ guṇa-doṣayoḥ
[kartreenaam guna-doshayoh]
na — not hi — indeed asya — to the living entity asti — there is priyaḥ — dear kaścit — someone na — not apriyaḥ — not dear svaḥ — own paraḥ — other api — also vā — or ekaḥ — the one sarva-dhiyām — of the varieties of intelligence draṣṭā — the seer kartṝṇām — of the performers guṇa-doṣayoḥ — of right and wrong activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na hy asyāsti priyaḥ kaścin
na
not
nāpriyaḥ svaḥ paro ’pi vā
ekaḥ sarva-dhiyāṁ draṣṭā
hi
indeed
asya
to the living entity
asti
there is
priyaḥ
dear
kartṝṇāṁ guṇa-doṣayoḥ
kaścit
someone
na
not
apriyaḥ
not dear
svaḥ
own
paraḥ
other
api
also
vā
or
ekaḥ
the one
sarva-dhiyām
of the varieties of intelligence
draṣṭā
the seer
kartṝṇām
of the performers
guṇa-doṣayoḥ
of right and wrong activities.
For this living entity, no one is dear, nor is anyone unfavorable. He makes no distinction between that which is his own and that which belongs to anyone else. He is one without a second; in other words, he is not affected by friends and enemies, well-wishers or mischief-mongers. He is only an observer, a witness, of the different qualities of men.

As explained in the previous verse, the living entity has the same qualities as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but he has them in minute quantities because he is a small particle ( sūkṣma ) whereas the Supreme Lord is all-pervading and great. For the Supreme Lord there are no friends, enemies or relatives, for He is completely free from all the disqualifications of ignorance that characterize the conditioned souls. On the other hand, He is extremely kind and favorable to His devotees, and He is not at all satisfied with persons who are envious of His devotees. As the Lord Himself confirms in Bhagavad-gītā (9.29) :

samo ’haṁ sarva-bhūteṣu na me dveṣyo ’sti na priyaḥ ye bhajanti tu māṁ bhaktyā mayi te teṣu cāpy aham

“I envy no one, nor am I partial to anyone. I am equal to all. But whoever renders service unto Me in devotion is a friend, is in Me, and I am also a friend to him.” The Supreme Lord has no enemy or friend, but He is inclined toward a devotee who always engages in His devotional service. Similarly, elsewhere in the Gītā (16.19) the Lord says:

tān ahaṁ dviṣataḥ krūrān saṁsāreṣu narādhamān kṣipāmy ajasram aśubhān āsurīṣv eva yoniṣu

“Those who are envious and mischievous, who are the lowest among men, are cast by Me into the ocean of material existence, into various demoniac species of life.” The Lord is extremely antagonistic toward those who are envious of His devotees. To protect His devotees, the Lord sometimes has to kill their enemies. For example, to protect Prahlāda Mahārāja, the Lord had to kill his enemy Hiraṇyakaśipu, although Hiraṇyakaśipu attained salvation because of being killed by the Lord. Since the Lord is the witness of everyone’s activities, He witnesses the actions of the enemies of His devotees, and He is inclined to punish them. In other cases, however, He simply witnesses what the living entities do and gives the results of one’s sinful or pious actions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord does not favor or disfavor anyone. He does not think that one person is his relative and another is not. He is one entity, the witness of all the jīvas with various types of intelligence, who act in terms of friend and enemy in relation to others. The Lord does not have relationships due to ignorance, such as relatives through marriage, relatives on the father’s side, enemies, and enemies disguised as friends. That is explained in this verse. The Lord does not like or hate anyone. However, the devotee is very dear to the Lord, considers the devotee to be himself. He shows anger to those who hate the devotees, and considered them enemies and different from himself. Thus the Gītā says: samo 'haṁ sarva-bhūteṣu na me dveṣyo 'sti na priyaḥ | ye bhajanti tu māṁ bhaktyā mayi te teṣu cāpy aham ||29|| I am equal to all living beings. I do not hate anyone nor do I favor anyone. To whatever extent a person worships me with devotion, I am attached to him in a similar way. BG 9.29 tān ahaṁ dviṣataḥ krūrān saṁsāreṣu narādhamān | kṣipāmy ajasram aśubhān āsurīṣv eva yoniṣu ||19|| I cast those hateful, cruel, and lowest of humans, constantly doing evil, into repeated birth and death in the wombs of demons. BG 16.19 These are ornaments, not faults, in the Lord, who is affectionate to his devotees. The jīvas are many and the Lord is one. The Lord is the witness of all the jīvas with various types of intelligence, who then act as friend or enemy for the benefit or misfortune (gunā-doṣayoḥ) of someone else.
For this entity, no one is dear or unfavorable, his or another's — he is one without a second, unaffected by friends and enemies. Real soul-vision is post-partisan.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I emotionally invested in a partisan view that the soul itself wouldn't sustain?
  • What would equanimity toward enemies actually look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.11

↗
नादत्त आत्मा हि गुणं न दोषं न क्रियाफलम् । उदासीनवदासीन: परावरद‍ृगीश्वर: ॥ ११ ॥
nādatta ātmā hi guṇaṁ
[naadatta aatmaa hi gunam]
na doṣaṁ na kriyā-phalam
[na dosham na kriyaa-phalam]
udāsīnavad āsīnaḥ
[udaaseenavad aaseenah]
parāvara-dṛg īśvaraḥ
[paraavara-drig eeshvarah]
na — not ādatte — accepts ātmā — the Supreme Lord hi — indeed guṇam — happiness na — not doṣam — unhappiness na — nor kriyā-phalam — the result of any fruitive activity udāsīna-vat — exactly like a neutral man āsīnaḥ — sitting (in the core of the heart) para-avara-dṛk — seeing the cause and effect īśvaraḥ — the Supreme Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nādatta ātmā hi guṇaṁ
na
not
ādatte
accepts
ātmā
the Supreme Lord
hi
indeed
guṇam
happiness
na doṣaṁ na kriyā-phalam
na
not
doṣam
unhappiness
na
nor
kriyā-phalam
the result of any fruitive activity
udāsīnavad āsīnaḥ
udāsīna-vat
exactly like a neutral man
āsīnaḥ
sitting (in the core of the heart)
parāvara-dṛg īśvaraḥ
para-avara-dṛk
seeing the cause and effect
īśvaraḥ
the Supreme Lord.
The Supreme Lord [ātmā], the creator of cause and effect, does not accept the happiness and distress that result from fruitive actions. He is completely independent of having to accept a material body, and because He has no material body, He is always neutral. The living entities, being part and parcel of the Lord, possess His qualities in a minute quantity. Therefore one should not be affected by lamentation.

The conditioned soul has friends and enemies. He is affected by the good qualities and the faults of his position. The Supreme Lord, however, is always transcendental. Because He is the īśvara, the supreme controller, He is not affected by duality. It may therefore be said that He sits in the core of everyone’s heart as the neutral witness of the causes and effects of one’s activities, good and bad. We should also understand that udāsīna, neutral, does not mean that He takes no action. Rather, it means that He is not personally affected. For example, a court judge is neutral when two opposing parties appear before him, but he still takes action as the case warrants. To become completely neutral, indifferent, to material activities, we should simply seek shelter at the lotus feet of the supreme neutral person.

Mahārāja Citraketu was advised that remaining neutral in such trying circumstances as the death of one’s son is impossible. Nevertheless, since the Lord knows how to adjust everything, the best course is to depend upon Him and do one’s duty in devotional service to the Lord. In all circumstances, one should be undisturbed by duality. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (2.47) :

karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana mā karma-phala-hetur bhūr mā te saṅgo ’stv akarmaṇi

“You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider yourself to be the cause of the results of your activities, and never be attached to not doing your duty.” One should execute one’s devotional duty, and for the results of one’s actions one should depend upon the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord does not recognize others as friend or enemy, nor is he subject to karmic results. He is situated as if neutral, witnessing the good and bad actions of the jīva. The jīva recognizes persons as friends or enemies by which he then experiences happiness and suffering as a result of his actions. The Lord is not like that. The Lord does not see others as friend or enemy and does not accept reactions for his acts. He is situated as the antaryāmī (udāsīnavat) in all beings, witnessing the good and bad actions of the jīva. He seems to be (iva) indifferent to the contrary natures of being friendly or inimical, but he is not (since he favors the devotee). Without surrender to the Lord, caused by mercy of devotees, it is very difficult for persons like Citraketu who are overcome by grief and illusion to cross over saṁsāra. What more can I say? This is the meaning of this section.
The Supreme Lord, creator of cause and effect, does not accept the happiness and distress of karmic fruits; He has no material body, so He has no friends or enemies. We are invited to inhabit a similar freedom.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I accepting karmic happiness and distress as constitutive of me?
  • How would imitation of the Lord's neutrality reshape me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.12

↗
श्रीबादरायणिरुवाच इत्युदीर्य गतो जीवो ज्ञातयस्तस्य ते तदा । विस्मिता मुमुचु: शोकं छित्त्वात्मस्‍नेहश‍ृङ्खलाम् ॥ १२ ॥
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
[shree-baadaraayanir uvaacha]
ity udīrya gato jīvo
[ity udeerya gato jeevo]
jñātayas tasya te tadā
[jnaatayas tasya te tadaa]
vismitā mumucuḥ śokaṁ
[vismitaa mumuchuh shokam]
chittvātma-sneha-śṛṅkhalām
[chittvaatma-sneha-shrinkhalaam]
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said iti — in this way udīrya — speaking gataḥ — went jīvaḥ — the living entity (who had appeared as the son of Mahārāja Citraketu) jñātayaḥ — the relatives and family members tasya — of him te — they tadā — at that time vismitāḥ — being astonished mumucuḥ — gave up śokam — lamentation chittvā — cutting off ātma-sneha — of affection due to a relationship śṛṅkhalām — the iron shackles.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
śrī-bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
ity udīrya gato jīvo
iti
in this way
udīrya
speaking
gataḥ
went
jīvaḥ
the living entity (who had appeared as the son of Mahārāja Citraketu)
jñātayas tasya te tadā
jñātayaḥ
the relatives and family members
tasya
of him
te
they
tadā
at that time
vismitā mumucuḥ śokaṁ
vismitāḥ
being astonished
mumucuḥ
gave up
śokam
lamentation
chittvātma-sneha-śṛṅkhalām
chittvā
cutting off
ātma-sneha
of affection due to a relationship
śṛṅkhalām
the iron shackles.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: When the conditioned soul [jīva] in the form of Mahārāja Citraketu’s son had spoken in this way and then left, Citraketu and the other relatives of the dead son were all astonished. Thus they cut off the shackles of their affection, which was due to their relationship with him, and gave up their lamentation.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: When that jīva had spoken in this way and then left, Citraketu and the other relatives, astonished by his words, cut off the shackles of their affection for him and gave up their lamentation.
After the conditioned soul (as Citraketu's son) had spoken and left, Citraketu and the relatives cut the shackles of affection caused by illusion. Right teaching, on right occasion, can sever real chains.
Reflection Questions
  • What teaching has actually cut a chain in me?
  • Where is a chain still uncut because the right teaching hasn't been spoken yet?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.13

↗
निर्हृत्य ज्ञातयो ज्ञातेर्देहं कृत्वोचिता: क्रिया: । तत्यजुर्दुस्त्यजं स्‍नेहं शोकमोहभयार्तिदम् ॥ १३ ॥
nirhṛtya jñātayo jñāter
[nirhritya jnaatayo jnaater]
dehaṁ kṛtvocitāḥ kriyāḥ
[deham kritvochitaah kriyaah]
tatyajur dustyajaṁ snehaṁ
[tatyajur dustyajam sneham]
śoka-moha-bhayārtidam
[shoka-moha-bhayaartidam]
nirhṛtya — removing jñātayaḥ — King Citraketu and all the other relatives jñāteḥ — of the son deham — the body kṛtvā — performing ucitāḥ — suitable kriyāḥ — activities tatyajuḥ — gave up dustyajam — very difficult to give up sneham — affection śoka — lamentation moha — illusion bhaya — fear arti — and distress dam — giving.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nirhṛtya jñātayo jñāter
nirhṛtya
removing
jñātayaḥ
King Citraketu and all the other relatives
jñāteḥ
of the son
dehaṁ kṛtvocitāḥ kriyāḥ
deham
the body
kṛtvā
performing
ucitāḥ
suitable
kriyāḥ
activities
tatyajur dustyajaṁ snehaṁ
tatyajuḥ
gave up
dustyajam
very difficult to give up
sneham
affection
śoka-moha-bhayārtidam
śoka
lamentation
moha
illusion
bhaya
fear
arti
and distress
dam
giving.
After the relatives had discharged their duties by performing the proper funeral ceremonies and burning the dead child’s body, they gave up the affection that leads to illusion, lamentation, fear and pain. Such affection is undoubtedly difficult to give up, but they gave it up very easily.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After the relatives had removed the body of the son and performed a proper funeral ceremony, they gave up the affection that leads to illusion, lamentation, fear and pain, which is difficult to give up.
After funeral rites and cremation, they gave up affection that produces illusion, lamentation, fear and pain — affection difficult to abandon. Ritual closure helps the inner detachment.
Reflection Questions
  • What ritual closure could help me with an attachment I haven't released?
  • Where am I trying inner work that needs an outer ceremony?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.14

↗
बालघ्‍न्यो व्रीडितास्तत्र बालहत्याहतप्रभा: । बालहत्याव्रतं चेरुर्ब्राह्मणैर्यन्निरूपितम् । यमुनायां महाराज स्मरन्त्यो द्विजभाषितम् ॥ १४ ॥
bāla-ghnyo vrīḍitās tatra
[baala-ghnyo vreeditaas tatra]
bāla-hatyā-hata-prabhāḥ
[baala-hatyaa-hata-prabhaah]
bāla-hatyā-vrataṁ cerur
[baala-hatyaa-vratam cherur]
brāhmaṇair yan nirūpitam
[braahmanair yan niroopitam]
yamunāyāṁ mahārāja
[yamunaayaam mahaaraaja]
smarantyo dvija-bhāṣitam
[smarantyo dvija-bhaashitam]
bāla-ghnyaḥ — the killers of the child vrīḍitāḥ — being very much ashamed tatra — there bāla-hatyā — because of killing the child hata — having lost prabhāḥ — all bodily luster bāla-hatyā-vratam — the atonement for killing the child ceruḥ — executed brāhmaṇaiḥ — by the priests yat — which nirūpitam — described yamunāyām — at the river Yamunā mahā-rāja — O King Parīkṣit smarantyaḥ — remembering dvija-bhāṣitam — the statement given by the brāhmaṇa..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bāla-ghnyo vrīḍitās tatra
bāla-ghnyaḥ
the killers of the child
vrīḍitāḥ
being very much ashamed
tatra
there
bāla-hatyā-hata-prabhāḥ
bāla-hatyā
because of killing the child
hata
having lost
prabhāḥ
all bodily luster
bāla-hatyā-vrataṁ cerur
bāla-hatyā-vratam
the atonement for killing the child
ceruḥ
executed
brāhmaṇair yan nirūpitam
brāhmaṇaiḥ
by the priests
yat
which
nirūpitam
described
yamunāyāṁ mahārāja
yamunāyām
at the river Yamunā
mahā-rāja
O King Parīkṣit
smarantyo dvija-bhāṣitam
smarantyaḥ
remembering
dvija-bhāṣitam
the statement given by the brāhmaṇa..
Queen Kṛtyadyuti’s co-wives, who had poisoned the child, were very much ashamed, and they lost all their bodily luster. While lamenting, O King, they remembered the instructions of Aṅgirā and gave up their ambition to bear children. Following the directions of the brāhmaṇas, they went to the bank of the Yamunā, where they bathed and atoned for their sinful activities.

In this verse the word bāla-hatyā-hata-prabhāḥ is to be particularly noted. The practice of killing children has existed in human society for a long time — since time immemorial — but in the days of yore it was very rarely performed. At the present moment, however, in this Age of Kali, abortion — killing of the child within the womb — has become very common, and sometimes a child is even killed after birth. If a woman performs such an abominable act, she gradually loses all her bodily luster ( bāla-hatyā-hata-prabhāḥ ). It is also to be noted that the ladies who had committed the sinful act of administering poison to the child were very much ashamed, and according to the directions of the brāhmaṇas, they had to undergo atonement for killing the child. Any woman who has ever performed such an infamously sinful act must atone for it, but no one now is doing that. Under the circumstances, the women responsible must suffer in this life and the next. Those who are sincere souls, after hearing this incident, should refrain from such child-killing and should atone for their sinful activities by taking to Kṛṣṇa consciousness very seriously. If one chants the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra without offenses, all of one’s sinful actions are surely atoned for immediately, but one should not commit such deeds again, for that is an offense.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Queen Kṛtyadyuti's co-wives, ashamed of killing the child, lost their bodily luster, and, remembering the words of Aṅgirā, atoned for the killing of the child on the Yamunā River as directed by brāhmaṇas. When everyone understood that the other wives had killed the child, by seeing that they had become pale, the wives became ashamed and frankly admitted that they had killed the child. They then performed atonement as directed by brāhmaṇas like Aṅgirā.
The co-wives who poisoned the child became ashamed and lost their luster; remembering Aṅgirā's instructions, they gave up the ambition to bear sons. Recognition of one's crime can be the start of renunciation.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'ambition' of mine secretly drove a harm I have not yet renounced?
  • Could I let go of the ambition rather than just regretting the act?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.15

↗
स इत्थं प्रतिबुद्धात्मा चित्रकेतुर्द्विजोक्तिभि: । गृहान्धकूपान्निष्क्रान्त: सर:पङ्कादिव द्विप: ॥ १५ ॥
sa itthaṁ pratibuddhātmā
[sa ittham pratibuddhaatmaa]
citraketur dvijoktibhiḥ
[chitraketur dvijoktibhih]
gṛhāndha-kūpān niṣkrāntaḥ
[grihaandha-koopaan nishkraantah]
saraḥ-paṅkād iva dvipaḥ
[sarah-pankaad iva dvipah]
saḥ — he ittham — in this way pratibuddha-ātmā — being fully aware of spiritual knowledge citraketuḥ — King Citraketu dvija-uktibhiḥ — by the instructions of the perfect brāhmaṇas (Aṅgirā and Nārada Muni) gṛha-andha-kūpāt — from the dark well of family life niṣkrāntaḥ — came out saraḥ — of a lake or reservoir of water paṅkāt — from the mud iva — like dvipaḥ — an elephant.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa itthaṁ pratibuddhātmā
saḥ
he
ittham
in this way
pratibuddha-ātmā
being fully aware of spiritual knowledge
citraketur dvijoktibhiḥ
citraketuḥ
King Citraketu
dvija-uktibhiḥ
by the instructions of the perfect brāhmaṇas (Aṅgirā and Nārada Muni)
gṛhāndha-kūpān niṣkrāntaḥ
gṛha-andha-kūpāt
from the dark well of family life
niṣkrāntaḥ
came out
saraḥ-paṅkād iva dvipaḥ
saraḥ
of a lake or reservoir of water
paṅkāt
from the mud
iva
like
dvipaḥ
an elephant.
Thus enlightened by the instructions of the brāhmaṇas Aṅgirā and Nārada, King Citraketu became fully aware of spiritual knowledge. As an elephant becomes free from a muddy reservoir of water, King Citraketu came out of the dark well of family life.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus enlightened by the instructions of the brāhmaṇas Aṅgirā and Nārada, King Citraketu emerged from the dark well of family life, just as an elephant emerges from the mud.
Enlightened by the brāhmaṇas, Citraketu emerged from the muddy reservoir of family attachment like an elephant from mire. The right help can pull an elephant out of mud the elephant cannot escape alone.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'mud' am I currently stuck in?
  • Who is the brāhmaṇa whose hand could pull me out?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.16

↗
कालिन्द्यां विधिवत् स्‍नात्वा कृतपुण्यजलक्रिय: । मौनेन संयतप्राणो ब्रह्मपुत्राववन्दत ॥ १६ ॥
kālindyāṁ vidhivat snātvā
[kaalindyaam vidhivat snaatvaa]
kṛta-puṇya-jala-kriyaḥ
[krita-punya-jala-kriyah]
maunena saṁyata-prāṇo
[maunena samyata-praano]
brahma-putrāv avandata
[brahma-putraav avandata]
kālindyām — in the river Yamunā vidhi-vat — according to prescribed regulations snātvā — bathing kṛta — performing puṇya — pious jala-kriyaḥ — oblations by offering water maunena — with gravity saṁyata-prāṇaḥ — controlling the mind and senses brahma-putrau — unto the two sons of Lord Brahmā (Aṅgirā and Nārada) avandata — offered his prayers and obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kālindyāṁ vidhivat snātvā
kālindyām
in the river Yamunā
vidhi-vat
according to prescribed regulations
snātvā
bathing
kṛta-puṇya-jala-kriyaḥ
kṛta
performing
puṇya
pious
jala-kriyaḥ
oblations by offering water
maunena saṁyata-prāṇo
maunena
with gravity
saṁyata-prāṇaḥ
controlling the mind and senses
brahma-putrāv avandata
brahma-putrau
unto the two sons of Lord Brahmā (Aṅgirā and Nārada)
avandata
offered his prayers and obeisances.
The King bathed in the water of the Yamunā, and according to prescribed duties, he offered oblations of water to the forefathers and demigods. Very gravely controlling his senses and mind, he then offered his respects and obeisances to the sons of Lord Brahmā [Aṅgirā and Nārada].
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After bathing in the Yamunā according to the rules, and offering oblations of water, controlling his senses and mind, the King then offered his respects to Aṅgirā and Nārada.
He bathed in the Yamunā, offered water-oblations to ancestors and demigods, controlled mind and senses, and bowed before the Acyuta brāhmaṇas. Recovery requires concrete devotional actions in order.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I sequenced my recovery with concrete devotional acts?
  • Which step in this list would help me today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.17

↗
अथ तस्मै प्रपन्नाय भक्ताय प्रयतात्मने । भगवान्नारद: प्रीतो विद्यामेतामुवाच ह ॥ १७ ॥
atha tasmai prapannāya
[atha tasmai prapannaaya]
bhaktāya prayatātmane
[bhaktaaya prayataatmane]
bhagavān nāradaḥ prīto
[bhagavaan naaradah preeto]
vidyām etām uvāca ha
[vidyaam etaam uvaacha ha]
atha — thereafter tasmai — unto him prapannāya — who was surrendered bhaktāya — being a devotee prayata-ātmane — who was self-controlled bhagavān — the most powerful nāradaḥ — Nārada prītaḥ — being very pleased vidyām — transcendental knowledge etām — this uvāca — spoke ha — indeed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha tasmai prapannāya
atha
thereafter
tasmai
unto him
prapannāya
who was surrendered
bhaktāya prayatātmane
bhaktāya
being a devotee
prayata-ātmane
who was self-controlled
bhagavān nāradaḥ prīto
bhagavān
the most powerful
nāradaḥ
Nārada
prītaḥ
being very pleased
vidyām etām uvāca ha
vidyām
transcendental knowledge
etām
this
uvāca
spoke
ha
indeed.
Thereafter, being very much pleased with Citraketu, who was a self-controlled devotee and surrendered soul, Nārada, the most powerful sage, spoke to him the following transcendental instructions.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, pleased with Citraketu, who was a self-controlled devotee and surrendered soul, Nārada, the most powerful sage, spoke to him the following instructions. The instructions last till verse 25.
Pleased with Citraketu — a self-controlled, surrendered devotee — Nārada spoke transcendental instructions. Surrender plus self-control draws further teaching.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I in a posture that would draw further teaching, or stuck at a previous level?
  • What would surrender plus self-control look like in this season?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.18-19

↗
ॐ नमस्तुभ्यं भगवते वासुदेवाय धीमहि । प्रद्युम्नायानिरुद्धाय नम: सङ्कर्षणाय च ॥ १८ ॥ नमो विज्ञानमात्राय परमानन्दमूर्तये । आत्मारामाय शान्ताय निवृत्तद्वैतद‍ृष्टये ॥ १९ ॥
oṁ namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
[om namas tubhyam bhagavate]
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
[vaasudevaaya dheemahi]
pradyumnāyāniruddhāya
[pradyumnaayaaniruddhaaya]
namaḥ saṅkarṣaṇāya ca
[namah sankarshanaaya cha]
namo vijñāna-mātrāya
[namo vijnaana-maatraaya]
paramānanda-mūrtaye
[paramaananda-moortaye]
ātmārāmāya śāntāya
[aatmaaraamaaya shaantaaya]
nivṛtta-dvaita-dṛṣṭaye
[nivritta-dvaita-drishtaye]
om — O my Lord namaḥ — obeisances tubhyam — unto You bhagavate — the Supreme Personality of Godhead vāsudevāya — Kṛṣṇa, the son of Vasudeva dhīmahi — let me meditate upon pradyumnāya — unto Pradyumna aniruddhāya — unto Aniruddha namaḥ — respectful obeisances saṅkarṣaṇāya — unto Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa ca — also namaḥ — all obeisances vijñāna-mātrāya — unto the form full of knowledge parama-ānanda-mūrtaye — full of transcendental bliss ātma-ārāmāya — unto the Lord, who is self-sufficient śāntāya — and free from disturbances nivṛtta-dvaita-dṛṣṭaye — whose vision turns away from duality, or who is one without a second.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
oṁ namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
om
O my Lord
namaḥ
obeisances
tubhyam
unto You
bhagavate
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
vāsudevāya dhīmahi
vāsudevāya
Kṛṣṇa, the son of Vasudeva
dhīmahi
let me meditate upon
pradyumnāyāniruddhāya
pradyumnāya
unto Pradyumna
aniruddhāya
unto Aniruddha
namaḥ saṅkarṣaṇāya ca
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
saṅkarṣaṇāya
unto Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa
ca
also
namo vijñāna-mātrāya
namaḥ
all obeisances
vijñāna-mātrāya
unto the form full of knowledge
paramānanda-mūrtaye
parama-ānanda-mūrtaye
full of transcendental bliss
ātmārāmāya śāntāya
ātma-ārāmāya
unto the Lord, who is self-sufficient
śāntāya
and free from disturbances
nivṛtta-dvaita-dṛṣṭaye
nivṛtta-dvaita-dṛṣṭaye
whose vision turns away from duality, or who is one without a second.
[Nārada gave Citraketu the following mantra.] O Lord, O Supreme Personality of Godhead, who are addressed by the oṁkāra [praṇava], I offer my respectful obeisances unto You. O Lord Vāsudeva, I meditate upon You. O Lord Pradyumna, Lord Aniruddha and Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa, I offer You my respectful obeisances. O reservoir of spiritual potency, O supreme bliss, I offer my respectful obeisances unto You, who are self-sufficient and most peaceful. O ultimate truth, one without a second, You are realized as Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān and are therefore the reservoir of all knowledge. I offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

In Bhagavad-gītā Kṛṣṇa says that He is praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu, the syllable om in the Vedic mantras. In transcendental knowledge, the Lord is addressed as praṇava, oṁkāra, which is a symbolic representation of the Lord in sound. Oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya. Vāsudeva, who is an expansion of Nārāyaṇa, expands Himself as Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Saṅkarṣaṇa. From Saṅkarṣaṇa comes a second Nārāyaṇa expansion, and from this Nārāyaṇa come further expansions of Vāsudeva, Pradyumna, Saṅkarṣaṇa and Aniruddha. The Saṅkarṣaṇa in this group is the original cause of the three puruṣas, namely Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu and Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu is situated in every universe in a special planet called Śvetadvīpa. This is confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā: aṇḍāntara-stha. The word aṇḍa means this universe. Within this universe is a planet called Śvetadvīpa, where Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu is situated. From Him come all the incarnations within this universe.

As confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā, all these forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are advaita, nondifferent, and they are also acyuta, infallible; they do not fall down like the conditioned souls. The ordinary living entity is prone to falling into the clutches of māyā, but the Supreme Lord in His different incarnations and forms is acyuta, infallible. Therefore His body is different from the material body possessed by the conditioned soul.

The word mātrā is explained in the Medinī dictionary as follows: mātrā karṇa-vibhūṣāyāṁ vitte māne paricchade. The word mātrā, in its different imports, is used to indicate the decoration of the ear, possession, respect, and the possession of a covering. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (2.14) :

mātrā-sparśās tu kaunteya śītoṣṇa-sukha-duḥkha-dāḥ āgamāpāyino ’nityās tāṁs titikṣasva bhārata

“O son of Kuntī, the nonpermanent appearance of happiness and distress, and their disappearance in due course, are like the appearance and disappearance of winter and summer seasons. They arise from sense perception, O scion of Bharata, and one must learn to tolerate them without being disturbed.” In the conditioned state of life, the body is used as our dress, and as one needs different dresses during the summer and winter, we conditioned souls are changing bodies according to our desires. However, because the body of the Supreme Lord is full of knowledge, it needs no covering. The idea that Kṛṣṇa’s body is like ours — in other words, that His body and soul are different — is a misunderstanding. There are no such differences for Kṛṣṇa, because His body is full of knowledge. Here we receive material bodies because of a lack of knowledge, but because Kṛṣṇa, Vāsudeva, is full of knowledge, there is no difference between His body and His soul. Kṛṣṇa remembers what He said forty million years ago to the sun-god, but an ordinary being cannot remember what he said the day before yesterday. This is the difference between Kṛṣṇa’s body and our body. Therefore the Lord is addressed as vijñāna-mātrāya paramānanda-mūrtaye.

Because the Lord’s body is full of knowledge, He always enjoys transcendental bliss. Indeed, His very form is paramānanda. This is confirmed in the Vedānta-sūtra: ānandamayo ’bhyāsāt. By nature the Lord is ānandamaya. Whenever we see Kṛṣṇa, He is always full of ānanda in all circumstances. No one can make Him morose. Ātmārāmāya: He does not need to search for external enjoyment, because He is self-sufficient. Śāntāya: He has no anxiety. One who has to seek pleasure from other sources is always full of anxiety. Karmīs, jñānīs and yogīs are full of anxiety because they want something, but a devotee does not want anything; he is simply satisfied in the service of the Lord, who is fully blissful.

Nivṛtta-dvaita-dṛṣṭaye: in our conditioned life our bodies have different parts, but although Kṛṣṇa apparently has different bodily parts, no part of His body is different from any other part. Kṛṣṇa can see with His eyes, and Kṛṣṇa can see without His eyes. Therefore in the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad it is said, paśyaty acakṣuḥ. He can see with His hands and legs. He does not need a particular bodily part to perform a particular action. Aṅgāni yasya sakalendriya-vṛttimanti: He can do anything He desires with any part of His body, and therefore He is called almighty.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
We offer respectful obeisances unto Vāsudeva, Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Saṅkarṣaṇa, to the Lord who is endowed with cit-śakti, who has a form of the highest bliss, who delights in himself, who is full of peace, and who is not attached to the material world. We offer respects to you. We mediate on you. We meditate on you to please you. Nine words (four are in the next verse) are used to distinguish the Supreme Lord from the jīva. Vijñāna-mātrāya refers to the Lord who is covered with pure cit-śakti, whereas the jīva is covered with ignorance. According to Medinī, mātrā can mean an ear ornament, wealth, a measure, and a covering. The Lord has a form of the highest bliss, but the jīva has a form of five material elements. The Lord enjoys his own bliss, but the jīva enjoys the bliss of material sense objects. The Lord is not (nivrṭta) attached (dṛṣṭaye) to the material world (dvaita), whereas the jīva is attached to the material world.
Nārada gives the mantra: 'O Lord addressed by oṁ, I bow; O Vāsudeva I meditate; O Pradyumna, Aniruddha, Saṅkarṣaṇa — to You I bow.' The four expansions of Vāsudeva structure the mantric address.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I learned even one mantric address with structural attention?
  • What would change if I prayed to each of the four expansions in turn?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.20

↗
आत्मानन्दानुभूत्यैव न्यस्तशक्त्यूर्मये नम: । हृषीकेशाय महते नमस्तेऽनन्तमूर्तये ॥ २० ॥
ātmānandānubhūtyaiva
[aatmaanandaanubhootyaiva]
nyasta-śakty-ūrmaye namaḥ
[nyasta-shakty-oormaye namah]
hṛṣīkeśāya mahate
[hrisheekeshaaya mahate]
namas te ’nanta-mūrtaye
[namas te ’nanta-moortaye]
ātma-ānanda — of Your personal bliss anubhūtyā — by perception eva — certainly nyasta — given up śakti-ūrmaye — the waves of material nature namaḥ — respectful obeisances hṛṣīkeśāya — unto the supreme controller of the senses mahate — unto the Supreme namaḥ — respectful obeisances te — unto You ananta — unlimited mūrtaye — whose expansions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ātmānandānubhūtyaiva
ātma-ānanda
of Your personal bliss
anubhūtyā
by perception
eva
certainly
nyasta-śakty-ūrmaye namaḥ
nyasta
given up
śakti-ūrmaye
the waves of material nature
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
hṛṣīkeśāya mahate
hṛṣīkeśāya
unto the supreme controller of the senses
mahate
unto the Supreme
namas te ’nanta-mūrtaye
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
te
unto You
ananta
unlimited
mūrtaye
whose expansions.
Perceiving Your personal bliss, You are always transcendental to the waves of material nature. Therefore, my Lord, I offer my respectful obeisances unto You. You are the supreme controller of the senses, and Your expansions of form are unlimited. You are the greatest, and therefore I offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

This verse analytically differentiates the living entity from the Supreme Lord. The form of the Lord and the form of the conditioned soul are different because the Lord is always blissful whereas the conditioned soul is always under the threefold miseries of the material world. The Supreme Lord is sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha. He derives ānanda, bliss, from His own self. The Lord’s body is transcendental, spiritual, but because the conditioned soul has a material body, he has many bodily and mental troubles. The conditioned soul is always perturbed by attachment and detachment, whereas the Supreme Lord is always free from such dualities. The Lord is the supreme master of all the senses, whereas the conditioned soul is controlled by the senses. The Lord is the greatest, whereas the living entity is the smallest. The living entity is conditioned by the waves of material nature, but the Supreme Lord is transcendental to all actions and reactions. The expansions of the Supreme Lord’s body are innumerable ( advaitam acyutam anādim ananta-rūpam ), but the conditioned soul is limited to only one form. From history we learn that a conditioned soul, by mystic power, can sometimes expand into eight forms, but the Lord’s bodily expansions are unlimited. This means that the bodies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead have no beginning and no end, unlike the bodies of the living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
We offer respects to you who are devoid of the waves of māyā since you enjoy in yourself, to you who control all the senses, to you, the greatest being, having an indestructible form. You have completely (ni) thrown off (asta) the waves of māyā (śakti) in the form of attachment and hatred. The jīva however is in the midst of the waves of attraction and hatred. You are the controller of all the senses (hṛśīkeṣāya) but the jīva is controlled by his senses. You are great but the jīva is small. You have forms which are indestructible, but the jīva has destructible bodies.
Perceiving Your personal bliss, You are transcendental to the waves of material nature — supreme controller of senses, of unlimited expansion. The Lord is described by what is true rather than what we wish.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose description of the Lord do I rely on — wish-projection or genuine perception?
  • How might I move from the first to the second?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.21

↗
वचस्युपरतेऽप्राप्य य एको मनसा सह । अनामरूपश्चिन्मात्र: सोऽव्यान्न: सदसत्पर: ॥ २१ ॥
vacasy uparate ’prāpya
[vachasy uparate ’praapya]
ya eko manasā saha
[ya eko manasaa saha]
anāma-rūpaś cin-mātraḥ
[anaama-roopash chin-maatrah]
so ’vyān naḥ sad-asat-paraḥ
[so ’vyaan nah sad-asat-parah]
vacasi — when the words uparate — cease aprāpya — not achieving the goal yaḥ — He who ekaḥ — one without a second manasā — the mind saha — with anāma — with no material name rūpaḥ — or material form cit-mātraḥ — totally spiritual saḥ — He avyāt — may kindly protect naḥ — us sat-asat-paraḥ — who is the cause of all causes (the supreme cause).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vacasy uparate ’prāpya
vacasi
when the words
uparate
cease
aprāpya
not achieving the goal
yaḥ
He who
ya eko manasā saha
ekaḥ
one without a second
manasā
the mind
saha
with
anāma-rūpaś cin-mātraḥ
anāma
with no material name
rūpaḥ
or material form
cit-mātraḥ
totally spiritual
so ’vyān naḥ sad-asat-paraḥ
saḥ
He
avyāt
may kindly protect
naḥ
us
sat-asat-paraḥ
who is the cause of all causes (the supreme cause).
The words and mind of the conditioned soul cannot approach the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for material names and forms are not applicable to the Lord, who is entirely spiritual, beyond the conception of gross and subtle forms. The impersonal Brahman is another of His forms. May He, by His pleasure, protect us.

The impersonal Brahman, which is the effulgence of the Lord, is described in this verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
May the Lord who is one entity with no form, who is pure consciousness, who is the cause of the material world and unapproachable by words and mind protect us! In this verse he offers respects to the impersonal feature of the Lord.
Words and mind of the conditioned cannot approach You — material names and forms do not apply; impersonal Brahman is implicit, but Your form is spiritual. The Lord's mystery is real, but His form is real too.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I confusing 'beyond my words' with 'no form'?
  • Can I hold mystery and personhood together?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.22

↗
यस्मिन्निदं यतश्चेदं तिष्ठत्यप्येति जायते । मृण्मयेष्विव मृज्जातिस्तस्मै ते ब्रह्मणे नम: ॥ २२ ॥
yasminn idaṁ yataś cedaṁ
[yasminn idam yatash chedam]
tiṣṭhaty apyeti jāyate
[tishthaty apyeti jaayate]
mṛṇmayeṣv iva mṛj-jātis
[mrinmayeshv iva mrij-jaatis]
tasmai te brahmaṇe namaḥ
[tasmai te brahmane namah]
yasmin — in whom idam — this (cosmic manifestation) yataḥ — from whom ca — also idam — this (cosmic manifestation) tiṣṭhati — stands apyeti — dissolves jāyate — is born mṛt-mayeṣu — in things made of earth iva — like mṛt-jātiḥ — birth from earth tasmai — unto Him te — You brahmaṇe — the supreme cause namaḥ — respectful obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yasminn idaṁ yataś cedaṁ
yasmin
in whom
idam
this (cosmic manifestation)
yataḥ
from whom
ca
also
idam
this (cosmic manifestation)
tiṣṭhaty apyeti jāyate
tiṣṭhati
stands
apyeti
dissolves
jāyate
is born
mṛṇmayeṣv iva mṛj-jātis
mṛt-mayeṣu
in things made of earth
iva
like
mṛt-jātiḥ
birth from earth
tasmai te brahmaṇe namaḥ
tasmai
unto Him
te
You
brahmaṇe
the supreme cause
namaḥ
respectful obeisances.
As pots made completely of earth are situated on earth after being created and are transformed into earth again when broken, this cosmic manifestation is caused by the Supreme Brahman, situated in the Supreme Brahman, and annihilated in the same Supreme Brahman. Therefore, since the Supreme Lord is the cause of Brahman, let us offer Him our respectful obeisances.

The Supreme Lord is the cause of the cosmic manifestation, He maintains it after creation, and after annihilation the Lord is the reservoir of everything.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
We offer respects to Brahman from whom the universe arises, in whom it remains and into whom it dissolves, just as earth is the cause of clay pots. He offers respects to the Lord as the cause of the universe. The universe resides in the Lord, arises from him and dissolves into him, just as earth is the cause of clay pots.
As earthen pots are situated on, transformed into earth, this manifestation is caused by, situated in, dissolved in the Supreme Brahman — Your basis. Pot and earth metaphor: distinct in form, one in substance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I emphasize the pot-shape of things and miss the underlying earth?
  • Where do I dissolve all into earth and miss the meaningful pot-shapes?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.23

↗
यन्न स्पृशन्ति न विदुर्मनोबुद्धीन्द्रियासव: । अन्तर्बहिश्च विततं व्योमवत्तन्नतोऽस्म्यहम् ॥ २३ ॥
yan na spṛśanti na vidur
[yan na sprishanti na vidur]
mano-buddhīndriyāsavaḥ
[mano-buddheendriyaasavah]
antar bahiś ca vitataṁ
[antar bahish cha vitatam]
vyomavat tan nato ’smy aham
[vyomavat tan nato ’smy aham]
yat — whom na — not spṛśanti — can touch na — nor viduḥ — can know manaḥ — the mind buddhi — the intelligence indriya — the senses asavaḥ — the life airs antaḥ — within bahiḥ — outside ca — also vitatam — expanded vyoma-vat — like the sky tat — unto Him nataḥ — bowed asmi — am aham — I.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yan na spṛśanti na vidur
yat
whom
na
not
spṛśanti
can touch
na
nor
viduḥ
can know
mano-buddhīndriyāsavaḥ
manaḥ
the mind
buddhi
the intelligence
indriya
the senses
asavaḥ
the life airs
antar bahiś ca vitataṁ
antaḥ
within
bahiḥ
outside
ca
also
vitatam
expanded
vyomavat tan nato ’smy aham
vyoma-vat
like the sky
tat
unto Him
nataḥ
bowed
asmi
am
aham
I.
The Supreme Brahman emanates from the Supreme Personality of Godhead and expands like the sky. Although untouched by anything material, it exists within and without. Nonetheless, the mind, intelligence, senses and living force can neither touch Him nor know Him. I offer unto Him my respectful obeisances.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to the Lord who spreads inside and outside like the air, and whom the mind, intelligence, senses and life airs cannot touch or know. He offers respects to the Lord how is beyond the senses. He cannot be touched by the action senses or known by the knowledge senses. “Well, that is because he is far away.” No, he is within all bodies. But he is also outside.
The Supreme Brahman emanates from the Supreme Person and expands like sky — untouched, existing within and without, yet mind, intelligence, senses cannot touch or see it. The medium of perception cannot perceive its source.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I demanding to perceive what by definition cannot be perceived by my instruments?
  • What humility does this fact ask of me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.24

↗
देहेन्द्रियप्राणमनोधियोऽमी यदंशविद्धा: प्रचरन्ति कर्मसु । नैवान्यदा लौहमिवाप्रतप्तं स्थानेषु तद् द्रष्ट्रपदेशमेति ॥ २४ ॥
dehendriya-prāṇa-mano-dhiyo ’mī
[dehendriya-praana-mano-dhiyo ’mee]
yad-aṁśa-viddhāḥ pracaranti karmasu
[yad-amsha-viddhaah pracharanti karmasu]
naivānyadā lauham ivāprataptaṁ
[naivaanyadaa lauham ivaaprataptam]
sthāneṣu tad draṣṭrapadeśam eti
[sthaaneshu tad drashtrapadesham eti]
deha — the body indriya — senses prāṇa — life airs manaḥ — mind dhiyaḥ — and intelligence amī — all those yat-aṁśa-viddhāḥ — being influenced by rays of Brahman, or the Supreme Lord pracaranti — they move karmasu — in various activities na — not eva — indeed anyadā — at other times lauham — iron iva — like aprataptam — not heated (by fire) sthāneṣu — in those circumstances tat — that draṣṭṛ-apadeśam — the name of a subject matter eti — achieves.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dehendriya-prāṇa-mano-dhiyo ’mī
deha
the body
indriya
senses
prāṇa
life airs
manaḥ
mind
dhiyaḥ
and intelligence
yad-aṁśa-viddhāḥ pracaranti karmasu
amī
all those
naivānyadā lauham ivāprataptaṁ
yat-aṁśa-viddhāḥ
being influenced by rays of Brahman, or the Supreme Lord
pracaranti
they move
karmasu
in various activities
na
not
eva
indeed
sthāneṣu tad draṣṭrapadeśam eti
anyadā
at other times
lauham
iron
iva
like
aprataptam
not heated (by fire)
sthāneṣu
in those circumstances
tat
that
draṣṭṛ-apadeśam
the name of a subject matter
eti
achieves.
As iron has the power to burn when made red-hot in the association of fire, so the body, senses, living force, mind and intelligence, although merely lumps of matter, can function in their activities when infused with a particle of consciousness by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As iron cannot burn unless heated by fire, the bodily senses cannot act unless favored by the Supreme Brahman.

Red-hot iron can burn, but it cannot burn the original fire. Therefore the consciousness of the small particle of Brahman is fully dependent on the power of the Supreme Brahman. In Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says, mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “From Me the conditioned soul receives memory, knowledge and forgetfulness.” The power for activities comes from the Supreme Lord, and when the Lord withdraws this power, the conditioned soul no longer has energy with which to act through his various senses. The body includes five knowledge-acquiring senses, five active senses and the mind, but actually these are merely lumps of matter. For example, the brain is nothing but matter, but when electrified by the energy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the brain can act, just as iron can burn when made red-hot by the influence of fire. The brain can act while we are awake or even while we are dreaming, but when we are fast asleep or unconscious the brain is inactive. Since the brain is a lump of matter, it does not have independent power with which to act. It can act only when favored by the influence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is Brahman or Parabrahman. This is the way to understand how the Supreme Brahman, Kṛṣṇa, is present everywhere, just as the sunshine is present because of the sun-god in the sun globe. The Supreme Lord is called Hṛṣīkeśa; He is the only conductor of the senses. Unless empowered by His energy, our senses cannot act. In other words, He is the only seer, the only worker, the only listener, and the only active principle or supreme controller.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Only when endowed with consciousness by the Lord do the body, senses, life airs and intelligence move to their objects, just as unheated iron cannot burn. Without the influence of the Lord they do not move. The Lord allows the jīva, who can see in waking and dream states, to see him--by endowing him with cit-śakti. The cause of the jīva’s ignorance of the Lord is explained. When a portion of the Lord’s consciousness enters (yad aṁśa-viddhāḥ), body, senses, life airs and intelligence can move towards their sense objects (karmaṣu), when a person is awake or dreaming, but not in other states (anyadā) such as deep sleep and fainting. Iron which is not heated does not burn. There is another meaning. Just as iron which has become a burning agent by the energy of fire does not burn fire itself, so the body and sense activated to their sense objects by the energy of Brahman do not touch Brahman. They do not know Brahman. “If the jīva is a seer why can he not know Brahman?” The Brahman makes the jīvas accomplish his seeing. And by giving the jīva a small portion of his consciousness in order to perfect the jīva’s seeing power, the jīva achieves the Lord. Some persons even say that the jīva is insentient like the mind. There is another meaning. The Brahman (tat) knows (eti) the jīva but the jīva does not know Brahman. It has been said in the Haṁsa-guhya prayers: deho 'savo 'kṣā manavo bhūta-mātrām ātmānam anyaṁ ca viduḥ paraṁ yat sarvaṁ pumān veda guṇāṁś ca taj-jño na veda sarva-jñam anantam īḍe The body, life airs, senses, internal senses, gross elements and sense objects do not know themselves or other things or the jīva. The jīva knows all of these items and the guṇas which cause them. He also knows Paramātmā, but does not know the omniscient Lord. I worship that Lord with infinite qualities. SB 6.4.25
As iron heated red-hot in fire can burn, the body, senses, mind become functional when infused with a particle of the Lord's consciousness. Spiritual contact is what enables our matter.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I credit my matter for what the spirit-particle within is doing?
  • What deliberate contact with the Lord could light up my iron?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.25

↗
ॐ नमो भगवते महापुरुषाय महानुभावाय महाविभूतिपतये सकलसात्वतपरिवृढनिकर करकमलकुड्‌मलोपलालितचरणारविन्दयुगल परमपरमेष्ठिन्नमस्ते ॥ २५ ॥
oṁ namo bhagavate mahā-puruṣāya mahānubhāvāya mahā-vibhūti-pataye sakala-sātvata-parivṛḍha-nikara-kara-kamala-kuḍmalopalālita-caraṇāravinda-yugala parama-parameṣṭhin namas te.
[om namo bhagavate mahaa-purushaaya mahaanubhaavaaya mahaa-vibhooti-pataye sakala-saatvata-parivridha-nikara-kara-kamala-kudmalopalaalita-charanaaravinda-yugala parama-parameshthin namas te.]
om — O Supreme Personality of Godhead namaḥ — respectful obeisances bhagavate — unto You, the Lord, who are full in six opulences mahā-puruṣāya — the supreme enjoyer mahā-anubhāvāya — the most perfect realized soul, or the Supersoul mahā-vibhūti-pataye — the master of all mystic power sakala-sātvata-parivṛḍha — of all the best devotees nikara — of the multitude kara-kamala — of the lotus hands kuḍmala — by the buds upalālita — served caraṇa-aravinda-yugala — whose two lotus feet parama — topmost parame-ṣṭhin — who are situated in the spiritual planet namaḥ te — respectful obeisances unto You.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
oṁ namo bhagavate mahā-puruṣāya mahānubhāvāya mahā-vibhūti-pataye sakala-sātvata-parivṛḍha-nikara-kara-kamala-kuḍmalopalālita-caraṇāravinda-yugala parama-parameṣṭhin namas te.
om
O Supreme Personality of Godhead
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
bhagavate
unto You, the Lord, who are full in six opulences
mahā-puruṣāya
the supreme enjoyer
mahā-anubhāvāya
the most perfect realized soul, or the Supersoul
mahā-vibhūti-pataye
the master of all mystic power
sakala-sātvata-parivṛḍha
of all the best devotees
nikara
of the multitude
kara-kamala
of the lotus hands
kuḍmala
by the buds
upalālita
served
caraṇa-aravinda-yugala
whose two lotus feet
parama
topmost
parame-ṣṭhin
who are situated in the spiritual planet
namaḥ te
respectful obeisances unto You.
O transcendental Lord, who are situated in the topmost planet of the spiritual world, Your two lotus feet are always massaged by a multitude of the best devotees with their lotus-bud hands. You are the Supreme Personality of Godhead, complete in six opulences. You are the supreme person mentioned in the Puruṣa-sūkta prayers. You are the most perfect, self-realized master of all mystic power. Let me offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

It is said that the Absolute Truth is one, but is manifested in different features as Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān. The previous verses described the Brahman and Paramātmā features of the Absolute Truth. Now this prayer is offered in bhakti-yoga to the Absolute Supreme Person. The words used in this regard are sakala-sātvata-parivṛḍha. The word sātvata means “devotees,” and sakala means “all together.” The devotees, who also have lotus feet, serve the lotus feet of the Lord with their lotus hands. The devotees may sometimes not be competent to serve the lotus feet of the Lord, and therefore the Lord is addressed as parama-parameṣṭhin. He is the Supreme Person, yet He is very kind to the devotees. No one is competent to serve the Lord, but even if a devotee is not competent, the merciful Lord accepts the humble attempt of the devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord whose lotus feet are affectionately massaged by the lotus hands of groups of excellent devotees! O supreme among supreme lords! We offer respects to the great person, the great authority, the Lord of great powers. Having spoken of the Lord giving knowledge, now the mantra speaks of the Lord giving rasa. O Lord with lotus feet which are massaged with affection by the bud-like lotus hands of groups of excellent devotees! The hint is “Please establish me also in the service of massaging your feet!” But you are very low. How can I engage you in such a high service? “But you are the supreme among supreme lords. You are able to do what others cannot do (parama-parameṣṭhin)!”
O Lord in the topmost spiritual planet, Your lotus feet are always massaged by Your best devotees with their lotus-bud hands. Worship at the highest level still uses recognizably human postures.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'massage of the feet' would I offer the Lord in my life-shape?
  • Where might worship be available in postures I have dismissed as too humble?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.26

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच भक्तायैतां प्रपन्नाय विद्यामादिश्य नारद: । ययावङ्गिरसा साकं धाम स्वायम्भुवं प्रभो ॥ २६ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
bhaktāyaitāṁ prapannāya
[bhaktaayaitaam prapannaaya]
vidyām ādiśya nāradaḥ
[vidyaam aadishya naaradah]
yayāv aṅgirasā sākaṁ
[yayaav angirasaa saakam]
dhāma svāyambhuvaṁ prabho
[dhaama svaayambhuvam prabho]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said bhaktāya — unto the devotee etām — this prapannāya — unto one who fully surrendered vidyām — transcendental knowledge ādiśya — instructing nāradaḥ — the great sage Nārada yayau — left aṅgirasā — the great saint Aṅgirā sākam — with dhāma — for the topmost planet svāyambhuvam — belonging to Lord Brahmā prabho — O King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
bhaktāyaitāṁ prapannāya
bhaktāya
unto the devotee
etām
this
prapannāya
unto one who fully surrendered
vidyām ādiśya nāradaḥ
vidyām
transcendental knowledge
ādiśya
instructing
nāradaḥ
the great sage Nārada
yayāv aṅgirasā sākaṁ
yayau
left
aṅgirasā
the great saint Aṅgirā
sākam
with
dhāma svāyambhuvaṁ prabho
dhāma
for the topmost planet
svāyambhuvam
belonging to Lord Brahmā
prabho
O King.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: Nārada, having become the spiritual master of Citraketu, instructed him fully in this prayer because Citraketu was fully surrendered. O King Parīkṣit, Nārada then left with the great sage Aṅgirā for the topmost planet, known as Brahmaloka.

When Aṅgirā had first come to visit King Citraketu, he did not bring Nārada with him. However, after the death of Citraketu’s son, Aṅgirā brought Nārada to instruct King Citraketu about bhakti-yoga. The difference was that in the beginning Citraketu was not in a temperament of renunciation, but after the death of his son, when he was overwhelmed by his great plight, he was awakened to the platform of renunciation by instructions regarding the falsity of this material world and material possessions. It is only at this stage that bhakti-yoga can be instructed. As long as one is attached to material enjoyment, bhakti-yoga cannot be understood. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (2.44) :

bhogaiśvarya-prasaktānāṁ tayāpahṛta-cetasām vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ samādhau na vidhīyate

“In the minds of those who are too attached to sense enjoyment and material opulence, and who are bewildered by such things, the resolute determination of devotional service to the Supreme Lord does not take place.” As long as one is very much attached to material enjoyment, one cannot concentrate his mind on the subject matter of devotional service.

The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is progressing successfully in the Western countries at the present moment because the youth in the West have reached the stage of vairāgya, or renunciation. They are practically disgusted with material pleasure from material sources, and this has resulted in a population of hippies throughout the Western countries. Now if these young people are instructed about bhakti-yoga, Kṛṣṇa consciousness, the instructions will certainly be effective.

As soon as Citraketu understood the philosophy of vairāgya-vidyā, the knowledge of renunciation, he could understand the process of bhakti-yoga. In this regard Śrīla Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya has said, vairāgya-vidyā-nija-bhakti-yoga. Vairāgya-vidyā and bhakti-yoga are parallel lines. One is essential for understanding the other. It is also said, bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktir anyatra ca ( Bhāg. 11.2.42 ). Advancement in devotional service, or Kṛṣṇa consciousness, is characterized by increasing renunciation of material enjoyment. Nārada Muni is the father of devotional service, and therefore, just to bestow causeless mercy upon King Citraketu, Aṅgirā brought Nārada Muni to instruct the King. These instructions were extremely effective. Anyone who follows in the footsteps of Nārada Muni is certainly a pure devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O King! Nārada, having instructed the devotee Citraketu who was fully surrendered this knowledge, then left with the great sage Aṅgirā for Brahmaloka. Nārada gave one (etām) great knowledge (the mantra) which contained many important statements. Aṅgirā was the person who bestowed Citraketu his son. Thus previously it was said Aṅgirā arrived with Nārada (SB 6.15.61). Now it is said, “Nārada left with Aṅgirā.” This indicates the importance of Nārada because he gave Citraketu the mantra. Śukadeva addresses the King as master (prabho) to indicate that he is very capable of understanding the meaning of these teachings.
Related verses
Having become Citraketu's spiritual master, Nārada instructed him fully in the prayer; then Nārada and Aṅgirā left for the topmost planet. Once initiation is given, the teachers depart and the student lives the practice.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I been given an initiation I am not yet practicing fully?
  • Whose departure is a sign that the work is mine now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.27

↗
चित्रकेतुस्तु तां विद्यां यथा नारदभाषिताम् । धारयामास सप्ताहमब्भक्ष: सुसमाहित: ॥ २७ ॥
citraketus tu tāṁ vidyāṁ
[chitraketus tu taam vidyaam]
yathā nārada-bhāṣitām
[yathaa naarada-bhaashitaam]
dhārayām āsa saptāham
[dhaarayaam aasa saptaaham]
ab-bhakṣaḥ susamāhitaḥ
[ab-bhakshah susamaahitah]
citraketuḥ — King Citraketu tu — indeed tām — that vidyām — transcendental knowledge yathā — just as nārada-bhāṣitām — instructed by the great sage Nārada dhārayām āsa — chanted sapta-aham — continuously for one week ap-bhakṣaḥ — only drinking water su-samāhitaḥ — with great attention and care.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
citraketus tu tāṁ vidyāṁ
citraketuḥ
King Citraketu
tu
indeed
tām
that
vidyām
transcendental knowledge
yathā nārada-bhāṣitām
yathā
just as
nārada-bhāṣitām
instructed by the great sage Nārada
dhārayām āsa saptāham
dhārayām āsa
chanted
sapta-aham
continuously for one week
ap-bhakṣaḥ
only drinking water
ab-bhakṣaḥ susamāhitaḥ
su-samāhitaḥ
with great attention and care.
Fasting and drinking only water, Citraketu for one week continuously chanted with great care and attention the mantra given by Nārada Muni.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Fasting and drinking only water, Citraketu for one week continuously chanted with great care and attention the mantra given by Nārada Muni.
Fasting and drinking only water, Citraketu chanted the given mantra with care for a week. Intensity, focus, and brevity together can produce a vision.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I dilute my practice through length rather than concentrate through intensity?
  • What week-long focus could I attempt?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.28

↗
तत: स सप्तरात्रान्ते विद्यया धार्यमाणया । विद्याधराधिपत्यं च लेभेऽप्रतिहतं नृप ॥ २८ ॥
tataḥ sa sapta-rātrānte
[tatah sa sapta-raatraante]
vidyayā dhāryamāṇayā
[vidyayaa dhaaryamaanayaa]
vidyādharādhipatyaṁ ca
[vidyaadharaadhipatyam cha]
lebhe ’pratihataṁ nṛpa
[lebhe ’pratihatam nripa]
tataḥ — from this saḥ — he sapta-rātra-ante — at the end of seven nights vidyayā — by the prayers dhāryamāṇayā — being carefully practiced vidyādhara-adhipatyam — mastership of the Vidyādharas (as an intermediate result) ca — also lebhe — achieved apratihatam — undeviated from the instructions of the spiritual master nṛpa — O King Parīkṣit.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ sa sapta-rātrānte
tataḥ
from this
saḥ
he
sapta-rātra-ante
at the end of seven nights
vidyayā dhāryamāṇayā
vidyayā
by the prayers
dhāryamāṇayā
being carefully practiced
vidyādharādhipatyaṁ ca
vidyādhara-adhipatyam
mastership of the Vidyādharas (as an intermediate result)
ca
also
lebhe ’pratihataṁ nṛpa
lebhe
achieved
apratihatam
undeviated from the instructions of the spiritual master
nṛpa
O King Parīkṣit.
O King Parīkṣit, after only one week of repeatedly practicing the mantra received from the spiritual master, Citraketu achieved the rule of the planet of the Vidyādharas as an intermediate product of his spiritual advancement in knowledge.

If a devotee, after being initiated, adheres rigidly to the instructions of the spiritual master, he is naturally endowed with the material opulences of vidyādhara-adhipatyam and similar posts as by-products. A devotee need not practice yoga, karma or jñāna to achieve a successful result. Devotional service alone is competent to award a devotee all material power. A pure devotee, however, is never attached to material power, although he gets it very easily without personal endeavor. Citraketu received this side benefit of his devotional service, which he rigidly performed in accordance with the instructions of Nārada.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King Parīkṣit! After only one week of repeatedly practicing the mantra, Citraketu achieved rulership of the planet of the Vidyādharas. First the intermediate results are described.
After a week, Citraketu achieved rulership of the Vidyādhara planet as an intermediate fruit. Real practice produces real intermediate fruits, not only the final one.
Reflection Questions
  • What intermediate fruits has my practice already produced that I have failed to notice?
  • Am I dismissing the path because the destination hasn't yet arrived?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.29

↗
तत: कतिपयाहोभिर्विद्ययेद्धमनोगति: । जगाम देवदेवस्य शेषस्य चरणान्तिकम् ॥ २९ ॥
tataḥ katipayāhobhir
[tatah katipayaahobhir]
vidyayeddha-mano-gatiḥ
[vidyayeddha-mano-gatih]
jagāma deva-devasya
[jagaama deva-devasya]
śeṣasya caraṇāntikam
[sheshasya charanaantikam]
tataḥ — thereafter katipaya-ahobhiḥ — within a few days vidyayā — by the spiritual mantra iddha-manaḥ-gatiḥ — the course of his mind being enlightened jagāma — went deva-devasya — of the master of all other lords or demigods śeṣasya — Lord Śeṣa caraṇa-antikam — to the shelter of the lotus feet.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ katipayāhobhir
tataḥ
thereafter
katipaya-ahobhiḥ
within a few days
vidyayeddha-mano-gatiḥ
vidyayā
by the spiritual mantra
iddha-manaḥ-gatiḥ
the course of his mind being enlightened
jagāma deva-devasya
jagāma
went
deva-devasya
of the master of all other lords or demigods
śeṣasya caraṇāntikam
śeṣasya
Lord Śeṣa
caraṇa-antikam
to the shelter of the lotus feet.
Thereafter, within a very few days, by the influence of the mantra that Citraketu had practiced, his mind became increasingly enlightened in spiritual progress, and he attained shelter at the lotus feet of Anantadeva.

A devotee’s ultimate achievement is to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord in any one of the planets in the spiritual sky. As a result of rigid execution of devotional service, a devotee receives all material opulences if these are required; otherwise, the devotee is not interested in material opulences, nor does the Supreme Lord award them. When a devotee is actually engaged in the devotional service of the Lord, his apparently material opulences are not material; they are all spiritual. For example, if a devotee spends money to construct a beautiful and costly temple, the construction is not material but spiritual ( nirbandhaḥ kṛṣṇa-sambandhe yuktaṁ vairāgyam ucyate ). A devotee’s mind is never diverted to the material side of the temple. The bricks, stone and wood used in the construction of the temple are spiritual, just as the Deity, although made of stone, is not stone but the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. The more one advances in spiritual consciousness, the more he can understand the elements of devotional service. Nothing in devotional service is material; everything is spiritual. Consequently a devotee is awarded so-called material opulence for spiritual advancement. This opulence is an aid to help the devotee advance toward the spiritual kingdom. Thus Mahārāja Citraketu remained in material opulence as a vidyādhara-pati, master of the Vidyādharas, and by executing devotional service he became perfect within a very few days and returned home, back to Godhead, taking shelter of the lotus feet of Lord Śeṣa, Ananta.

A karmī’s material opulence and a devotee’s material opulence are not on the same level. Śrīla Madhvācārya comments in this way:

anyāntaryāmiṇaṁ viṣṇum upāsyānya-samīpagaḥ bhaved yogyatayā tasya padaṁ vā prāpnuyān naraḥ

By worshiping Lord Viṣṇu one can get whatever he desires, but a pure devotee never asks Lord Viṣṇu for any material profit. Instead he serves Lord Viṣṇu without material desires and is therefore ultimately transferred to the spiritual kingdom. In this regard, Śrīla Vīrarāghava Ācārya comments, yatheṣṭa-gatir ity arthaḥ: by worshiping Viṣṇu, a devotee can get whatever he likes. Mahārāja Citraketu wanted only to return home, back to Godhead, and therefore he achieved success in that way.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Within a few days, Citraketu, whose mind was blazing with knowledge, attained the shelter at the lotus feet of Anantadeva. This verse describes the primary result.
Within a few more days the mantra increased his enlightenment, and he attained shelter at Anantadeva's lotus feet. Spiritual progress can accelerate quickly once direction is set.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I expected the early plateau to last forever, missing the acceleration that comes later?
  • What would committing to direction-without-results do for me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.30

↗
मृणालगौरं शितिवाससं स्फुरत्- किरीटकेयूरकटित्रकङ्कणम् । प्रसन्नवक्त्रारुणलोचनं वृतं ददर्श सिद्धेश्वरमण्डलै: प्रभुम् ॥ ३० ॥
mṛṇāla-gauraṁ śiti-vāsasaṁ sphurat-
[mrinaala-gauram shiti-vaasasam sphurat-]
kirīṭa-keyūra-kaṭitra-kaṅkaṇam
[kireeta-keyoora-katitra-kankanam]
prasanna-vaktrāruṇa-locanaṁ vṛtaṁ
[prasanna-vaktraaruna-lochanam vritam]
dadarśa siddheśvara-maṇḍalaiḥ prabhum
[dadarsha siddheshvara-mandalaih prabhum]
mṛṇāla-gauram — white like the fibers of a lotus śiti-vāsasam — wearing garments of blue silk sphurat — glittering kirīṭa — helmet keyūra — armlets kaṭitra — belt kaṅkaṇam — whose bangles prasanna-vaktra — smiling face aruṇa-locanam — having reddish eyes vṛtam — surrounded dadarśa — he saw siddha-īśvara-maṇḍalaiḥ — by the most perfect devotees prabhum — the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mṛṇāla-gauraṁ śiti-vāsasaṁ sphurat-
mṛṇāla-gauram
white like the fibers of a lotus
śiti-vāsasam
wearing garments of blue silk
sphurat
glittering
kirīṭa-keyūra-kaṭitra-kaṅkaṇam
kirīṭa
helmet
keyūra
armlets
kaṭitra
belt
kaṅkaṇam
whose bangles
prasanna-vaktrāruṇa-locanaṁ vṛtaṁ
prasanna-vaktra
smiling face
aruṇa-locanam
having reddish eyes
vṛtam
surrounded
dadarśa siddheśvara-maṇḍalaiḥ prabhum
dadarśa
he saw
siddha-īśvara-maṇḍalaiḥ
by the most perfect devotees
prabhum
the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Upon reaching the shelter of Lord Śeṣa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Citraketu saw that He was as white as the white fibers of a lotus flower. He was dressed in bluish garments and adorned with a brilliantly glittering helmet, armlets, belt and bangles. His face was smiling, and His eyes were reddish. He was surrounded by such exalted liberated persons as Sanat-kumāra.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He saw the Lord, white like a water lily, wearing a blue cloth, a glittering helmet, armlets, belt and bracelets, with smiling face and lotus eyes, surrounded by a group of perfected sages. Siti-vāsasam means “wearing blue cloth.” Kaṭitram means a belt.
At Lord Śeṣa's shelter Citraketu saw Him: white as lotus fibers, dressed in blue, brilliant helmet, bracelets, belt — a vivid spiritual form. Vision is not blur; it is detail.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I let my imagined Lord be blurry?
  • Could I cultivate one specific form with care?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.31

↗
तद्दर्शनध्वस्तसमस्तकिल्बिष: स्वस्थामलान्त:करणोऽभ्ययान्मुनि: । प्रवृद्धभक्त्या प्रणयाश्रुलोचन: प्रहृष्टरोमानमदादिपुरुषम् ॥ ३१ ॥
tad-darśana-dhvasta-samasta-kilbiṣaḥ
[tad-darshana-dhvasta-samasta-kilbishah]
svasthāmalāntaḥkaraṇo ’bhyayān muniḥ
[svasthaamalaantahkarano ’bhyayaan munih]
pravṛddha-bhaktyā praṇayāśru-locanaḥ
[pravriddha-bhaktyaa pranayaashru-lochanah]
prahṛṣṭa-romānamad ādi-puruṣam
[prahrishta-romaanamad aadi-purusham]
tat-darśana — by the sight of the Supreme Personality of Godhead dhvasta — destroyed samasta-kilbiṣaḥ — having all sins svastha — healthy amala — and pure antaḥkaraṇaḥ — the core of whose heart abhyayāt — approached face to face muniḥ — the King, who was silent due to full mental satisfaction pravṛddha-bhaktyā — with an attitude of increased devotional service praṇaya-aśru-locanaḥ — with tears in his eyes because of love prahṛṣṭa-roma — his hairs standing on end due to jubilation anamat — offered respectful obeisances ādi-puruṣam — unto the expansion of the original personality.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad-darśana-dhvasta-samasta-kilbiṣaḥ
tat-darśana
by the sight of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
dhvasta
destroyed
samasta-kilbiṣaḥ
having all sins
svasthāmalāntaḥkaraṇo ’bhyayān muniḥ
svastha
healthy
amala
and pure
antaḥkaraṇaḥ
the core of whose heart
pravṛddha-bhaktyā praṇayāśru-locanaḥ
abhyayāt
approached face to face
muniḥ
the King, who was silent due to full mental satisfaction
pravṛddha-bhaktyā
with an attitude of increased devotional service
prahṛṣṭa-romānamad ādi-puruṣam
praṇaya-aśru-locanaḥ
with tears in his eyes because of love
prahṛṣṭa-roma
his hairs standing on end due to jubilation
anamat
offered respectful obeisances
ādi-puruṣam
unto the expansion of the original personality.
As soon as Mahārāja Citraketu saw the Supreme Lord, he was cleansed of all material contamination and situated in his original Kṛṣṇa consciousness, being completely purified. He became silent and grave, and because of love for the Lord, tears fell from his eyes, and his hairs stood on end. With great devotion and love, he offered his respectful obeisances unto the original Personality of Godhead.

The word tad-darśana-dhvasta-samasta-kilbiṣaḥ is very important in this verse. If one regularly sees the Supreme Personality of Godhead in the temple, one will gradually be disinfected of all material desires simply by visiting the temple and seeing the Deity. When one is freed from all the results of sinful activities, one will be purified, and with a healthy mind, completely cleansed, he will increasingly make progress in Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His grief from not being able to attain the Lord was destroyed on seeing him. With completely spotless mind, he approached the Lord silently. With tears streaming from his eyes in great devotion and with hairs standing on end, he offered respects to the Lord. Kilbiṣaḥ means Citraketu’s grief on not attaining the Lord. Seeing the Lord, he approached, and offered respects.
Seeing the Lord cleansed Citraketu of all contamination; he stood silently, eyes brimming with tears of love. Real darśana acts before any word is spoken.
Reflection Questions
  • What in me would simply dissolve in genuine darśana?
  • How might I prepare for such a meeting?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.32

↗
स उत्तमश्लोकपदाब्जविष्टरं प्रेमाश्रुलेशैरुपमेहयन्मुहु: । प्रेमोपरुद्धाखिलवर्णनिर्गमो नैवाशकत्तं प्रसमीडितुं चिरम् ॥ ३२ ॥
sa uttamaśloka-padābja-viṣṭaraṁ
[sa uttamashloka-padaabja-vishtaram]
premāśru-leśair upamehayan muhuḥ
[premaashru-leshair upamehayan muhuh]
premoparuddhākhila-varṇa-nirgamo
[premoparuddhaakhila-varna-nirgamo]
naivāśakat taṁ prasamīḍituṁ ciram
[naivaashakat tam prasameeditum chiram]
saḥ — he uttamaśloka — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead pada-abja — of the lotus feet viṣṭaram — the resting place prema-aśru — of tears of pure love leśaiḥ — by drops upamehayan — moistening muhuḥ — again and again prema-uparuddha — choked with love akhila — all varṇa — of the letters nirgamaḥ — the coming out na — not eva — indeed aśakat — was able tam — unto Him prasamīḍitum — to offer prayers ciram — for a long time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa uttamaśloka-padābja-viṣṭaraṁ
saḥ
he
uttamaśloka
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
pada-abja
of the lotus feet
viṣṭaram
the resting place
premāśru-leśair upamehayan muhuḥ
prema-aśru
of tears of pure love
leśaiḥ
by drops
upamehayan
moistening
muhuḥ
again and again
premoparuddhākhila-varṇa-nirgamo
prema-uparuddha
choked with love
akhila
all
varṇa
of the letters
nirgamaḥ
the coming out
naivāśakat taṁ prasamīḍituṁ ciram
na
not
eva
indeed
aśakat
was able
tam
unto Him
prasamīḍitum
to offer prayers
ciram
for a long time.
With tears of love and affection, Citraketu repeatedly moistened the resting place of the Supreme Lord’s lotus feet. Because his voice was choked in ecstasy, for a considerable time he was unable to utter any of the letters of the alphabet to offer the Lord suitable prayers.

All the letters of the alphabet and the words constructed by those letters are meant for offering prayers to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Mahārāja Citraketu had the opportunity to offer prayers to the Lord by composing nice verses from the letters of the alphabet, but because of his ecstasy, for a considerable time he could not join those letters to offer prayers to the Lord. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.5.22) :

idaṁ hi puṁsas tapasaḥ śrutasya vā sviṣṭasya sūktasya ca buddhi-dattayoḥ avicyuto ’rthaḥ kavibhir nirūpito yad uttamaśloka-guṇānuvarṇanam

If one has scientific, philosophical, political, economic or any other abilities and wants perfection in his knowledge, he should offer prayers to the Supreme Personality of Godhead by composing first-class poetry or engaging his talents in the service of the Lord. Citraketu wanted to do this, but he was unable because of loving ecstasy. Therefore he had to wait for a considerable time before be could offer prayers.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With tears of love and affection, Citraketu repeatedly moistened the resting place of the Supreme Lord's lotus feet. Because his voice was choked in ecstasy, for a considerable time he was unable to utter any of the letters of the alphabet to offer the Lord suitable prayers. After offering respects he began to praise the Lord. Viṣṭaram means a seat. Upamehayan means he sprinkled.”
Tears watered the resting place of the Lord's feet; choked, Citraketu couldn't utter any letter for a long time. Some worship is wordless and superior.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I rushing to speak when wordless presence would be the truer worship?
  • What practice cultivates the capacity to remain choked-and-grateful?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.33

↗
तत: समाधाय मनो मनीषया बभाष एतत्प्रतिलब्धवागसौ । नियम्य सर्वेन्द्रियबाह्यवर्तनं जगद्गुरुं सात्वतशास्त्रविग्रहम् ॥ ३३ ॥
tataḥ samādhāya mano manīṣayā
[tatah samaadhaaya mano maneeshayaa]
babhāṣa etat pratilabdha-vāg asau
[babhaasha etat pratilabdha-vaag asau]
niyamya sarvendriya-bāhya-vartanaṁ
[niyamya sarvendriya-baahya-vartanam]
jagad-guruṁ sātvata-śāstra-vigraham
[jagad-gurum saatvata-shaastra-vigraham]
tataḥ — thereafter samādhāya — controlling manaḥ — the mind manīṣayā — by his intelligence babhāṣa — spoke etat — this pratilabdha — recovering vāk — speech asau — that one (King Citraketu) niyamya — controlling sarva-indriya — of all the senses bāhya — external vartanam — the wandering jagat-gurum — who is the spiritual master of everyone sātvata — of devotional service śāstra — of the holy scriptures vigraham — the personified form.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ samādhāya mano manīṣayā
tataḥ
thereafter
samādhāya
controlling
manaḥ
the mind
manīṣayā
by his intelligence
babhāṣa etat pratilabdha-vāg asau
babhāṣa
spoke
etat
this
pratilabdha
recovering
vāk
speech
asau
that one (King Citraketu)
niyamya sarvendriya-bāhya-vartanaṁ
niyamya
controlling
sarva-indriya
of all the senses
bāhya
external
vartanam
the wandering
jagad-guruṁ sātvata-śāstra-vigraham
jagat-gurum
who is the spiritual master of everyone
sātvata
of devotional service
śāstra
of the holy scriptures
vigraham
the personified form.
Thereafter, by controlling his mind with his intelligence and thus restricting his senses from external engagements, he recovered suitable words with which to express his feelings. Thus he began offering prayers to the Lord, who is the personification of the holy scriptures [the sātvata-saṁhitās like the Brahma-saṁhitā and the Nārada-pañcarātra] and who is the spiritual master of all. He offered his prayers as follows.

One cannot offer prayers to the Lord with mundane words. One must become spiritually advanced by controlling the mind and senses. Then he can find suitable words to offer in prayers to the Lord. Quoting the following verse from the Padma Purāṇa, Śrīla Sanātana Gosvāmī forbids us to sing any song not sung by authorized devotees.

avaiṣṇava-mukhodgīrṇaṁ pūtaṁ hari-kathāmṛtam śravaṇaṁ naiva kartavyaṁ sarpocchiṣṭaṁ yathā payaḥ

The words or songs of a person not fixed in Vaiṣṇava behavior, not strictly following the rules and regulations and chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra should not be accepted by pure devotees. The words sātvata-śāstra-vigraham indicate that the sac-cid-ānanda body of the Lord can never be accepted to be made of māyā. Devotees do not offer prayers to the Lord in an imaginary form. The existence of the Lord’s form is supported by all Vedic literature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By controlling his mind with his intelligence and controlling the external path of his senses, he recovered his speech and offered prayers to the Lord, who has a spiritual form as described in the Vaiṣṇava literature and who is the guru of the universe. Citraketu regained his speech by the mercy of the Lord. The Lord had a form of eternity, knowledge and bliss which is described in the Sātvata scriptures. This statement negates the idea that the Lord has a form of māyā as described in the jñāna scriptures.
Recovering by intelligence, he restrained his senses and began offering prayers to the Lord, who is the personification of the Vedas. The order is: choke, recover, speak.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I forced speech before I had recovered from choke?
  • What discipline of intelligence helps the right speech eventually return?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.34

↗
चित्रकेतुरुवाच अजित जित: सममतिभि: साधुभिर्भवान् जितात्मभिर्भवता । विजितास्तेऽपि च भजता- मकामात्मनां य आत्मदोऽतिकरुण: ॥ ३४ ॥
citraketur uvāca
[chitraketur uvaacha]
ajita jitaḥ sama-matibhiḥ
[ajita jitah sama-matibhih]
sādhubhir bhavān jitātmabhir bhavatā
[saadhubhir bhavaan jitaatmabhir bhavataa]
vijitās te ’pi ca bhajatām
[vijitaas te ’pi cha bhajataam]
akāmātmanāṁ ya ātmado ’ti-karuṇaḥ
[akaamaatmanaam ya aatmado ’ti-karunah]
citraketuḥ uvāca — King Citraketu said ajita — O my unconquerable Lord jitaḥ — conquered sama-matibhiḥ — by persons who have conquered the mind sādhubhiḥ — the devotees bhavān — Your Lordship jita-ātmabhiḥ — who have completely controlled the senses bhavatā — by You vijitāḥ — conquered te — they api — also ca — and bhajatām — to those who always engage in Your service akāma-ātmanām — with no motives for material profit yaḥ — who ātma-daḥ — giving Yourself ati-karuṇaḥ — extremely merciful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
citraketur uvāca
citraketuḥ uvāca
King Citraketu said
ajita jitaḥ sama-matibhiḥ
ajita
O my unconquerable Lord
jitaḥ
conquered
sama-matibhiḥ
by persons who have conquered the mind
sādhubhir bhavān jitātmabhir bhavatā
sādhubhiḥ
the devotees
bhavān
Your Lordship
jita-ātmabhiḥ
who have completely controlled the senses
bhavatā
by You
vijitās te ’pi ca bhajatām
vijitāḥ
conquered
te
they
api
also
ca
and
bhajatām
to those who always engage in Your service
akāmātmanāṁ ya ātmado ’ti-karuṇaḥ
akāma-ātmanām
with no motives for material profit
yaḥ
who
ātma-daḥ
giving Yourself
ati-karuṇaḥ
extremely merciful.
Citraketu said: O unconquerable Lord, although You cannot be conquered by anyone, You are certainly conquered by devotees who have control of the mind and senses. They can keep You under their control because You are causelessly merciful to devotees who desire no material profit from You. Indeed, You give Yourself to them, and because of this You also have full control over Your devotees.

The Lord and the devotees both conquer. The Lord is conquered by the devotees, and the devotees are conquered by the Lord. Because of being conquered by one another, they both derive transcendental bliss from their relationship. The highest perfection of this mutual conquering is exhibited by Kṛṣṇa and the gopīs. The gopīs conquered Kṛṣṇa, and Kṛṣṇa conquered the gopīs. Thus whenever Kṛṣṇa played His flute, He conquered the minds of the gopīs, and without seeing the gopīs Kṛṣṇa could not be happy. Other transcendentalists, such as jñānīs and yogīs, cannot conquer the Supreme Personality of Godhead; only pure devotees can conquer Him.

Pure devotees are described as sama-mati, which means that they never deviate from devotional service under any circumstances. It is not that devotees worship the Supreme Lord only when happy; they worship Him even when in distress. Happiness and distress do not hamper the process of devotional service. Therefore Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam says that devotional service is ahaituky apratihatā, unmotivated and uninterrupted. When a devotee offers devotional service to the Lord without any motive ( anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyam , his service cannot be hampered by any material condition ( apratihatā ). Thus a devotee who offers service in all conditions of life can conquer the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

A special distinction between devotees and the other transcendentalists, namely the jñānīs and yogīs, is that jñānīs and yogīs artificially try to become one with the Supreme, whereas devotees never aspire for such an impossible accomplishment. Devotees know that their position is to be eternally servants of the Supreme Lord and never to be one with Him. Therefore they are called sama-mati or jitātmā. They detest oneness with the Supreme. They have no lusty desires for oneness; instead, their desire is to be freed from all material hankering. Therefore they are called niṣkāma, desireless. A living entity cannot exist without desires, but desires that can never be fulfilled are called kāma, lusty desires. Kāmais tais tair hṛta jñānāḥ: because of lusty desires, nondevotees are deprived of their intelligence. Thus they are unable to conquer the Supreme Lord, whereas devotees, being freed from such unreasonable desires, can conquer the Lord. Such devotees are also conquered by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Because they are pure, being free from all material desires, they fully surrender to the Supreme Lord, and therefore the Lord conquers them. Such devotees never aspire for liberation. They simply desire to serve the lotus feet of the Lord. Because they serve the Lord without desires for remuneration, they can conquer the mercy of the Lord. The Lord is by nature very merciful, and when He sees that His servant is working without desires for material profit, naturally He is conquered.

Devotees are always engaged in service.

sa vai manaḥ kṛṣṇa-padāravindayor vacāṁsi vaikuṇṭha-guṇānuvarṇane

All the activities of their senses are engaged in the service of the Lord. Because of such devotion, the Lord gives Himself to His devotees as if they could use Him for any purpose they might desire. Of course, devotees have no purpose other than to serve. When a devotee fully surrenders and has no aspiration for material profit, the Lord certainly gives him all opportunities for service. This is the position of the Lord when conquered by His devotees.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Citraketu said: O unconquerable Lord! Although you cannot be conquered by anyone, you are conquered by devotees who have control of the mind and senses. The devotees are conquered by you, who are merciful and give yourself to those who worship you without material desires. The Lord and the devotee both drown in an ocean of blissful rasa attained by being controlled by each other through bhakti. In this way Citraketu praised the Lord. O unconquered Lord! You are not conquered by jñānīs and yogīs. But you are conquered by devotees, and are made dependent on devotees, who are equal in their happiness and suffering (sama-matibhiḥ), and who have controlled the mind, controlled kama, which is the nature of the mind. Thus they are without material desires in their worship. This is a cause of conquering you. These devotees are conquered by you, because you give yourself to those who worship without material desires. “If you serve me alone, and do not request liberation or anything else from me, serving me day and night, you make me a debtor.” The Lord gives himself to those persons. This means that the Lord gives them objects for the eye, ear and nose, such as his beauty, the sound of his voice, and his fragrance. The cause of conquering them is that you give yourself. The word sādhubhiḥ should not be taken to mean jñānīs, since the words bhajatām akāmātmanām are used later in the verse. The jñānīs worship the Lord at the stage of sādhana, but with desire for liberation. The word bhajatām is in the present tense. The jñānīs are not without desire since they desire to destroy their suffering.
O unconquerable Lord, You are conquered by devotees who control mind and senses — You are causelessly merciful to even the impersonalists. The 'unconquerable' is a relational title; love conquers Him.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I treated the Lord as unreachable when devotion has been the explicit route?
  • What in my devotional life could 'conquer' Him a little more today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.35

↗
तव विभव: खलु भगवन् जगदुदयस्थितिलयादीनि । विश्वसृजस्तेꣷशांशा स्तत्र मृषा स्पर्धन्ति पृथगभिमत्या ॥ ३५ ॥
tava vibhavaḥ khalu bhagavan
[tava vibhavah khalu bhagavan]
jagad-udaya-sthiti-layādīni
[jagad-udaya-sthiti-layaadeeni]
viśva-sṛjas te ’ṁśāṁśās
[vishva-srijas te ’mshaamshaas]
tatra mṛṣā spardhanti pṛthag abhimatyā
[tatra mrishaa spardhanti prithag abhimatyaa]
tava — Your vibhavaḥ — opulences khalu — indeed bhagavan — O Supreme Personality of Godhead jagat — of the cosmic manifestation udaya — the creation sthiti — maintenance laya-ādīni — dissolution and so on viśva-sṛjaḥ — the creators of the manifested world te — they aṁśa-aṁśāḥ — parts of Your plenary portion tatra — in that mṛṣā — in vain spardhanti — rival one another pṛthak — of separateness abhimatyā — by a false conception.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tava vibhavaḥ khalu bhagavan
tava
Your
vibhavaḥ
opulences
khalu
indeed
bhagavan
O Supreme Personality of Godhead
jagad-udaya-sthiti-layādīni
jagat
of the cosmic manifestation
udaya
the creation
sthiti
maintenance
laya-ādīni
dissolution and so on
viśva-sṛjas te ’ṁśāṁśās
viśva-sṛjaḥ
the creators of the manifested world
te
they
aṁśa-aṁśāḥ
parts of Your plenary portion
tatra mṛṣā spardhanti pṛthag abhimatyā
tatra
in that
mṛṣā
in vain
spardhanti
rival one another
pṛthak
of separateness
abhimatyā
by a false conception.
My dear Lord, this cosmic manifestation and its creation, maintenance and annihilation are all but Your opulences. Since Lord Brahmā and the other creators are nothing but small portions of a portion of You, their partial power to create does not make them God [īśvara]. Their consciousness of themselves as separate Lords is therefore merely false prestige. It is not valid.

A devotee who has fully surrendered to the lotus feet of the Lord knows very well that the creative energy of the living entities, from Lord Brahmā down to the small ant, exists because the living entities are part and parcel of the Lord. In Bhagavad-gītā (15.7) the Lord says, mamaivāṁśo jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ: “The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal, fragmental parts.” The living entities are nothing but very small portions of the supreme spirit, like sparks of a fire. Because they are part of the Supreme, they have a creative quality in a very minute quantity.

The so-called scientists of the modern materialistic world are proud because they have created modern facilities like great airplanes, but the credit for creating the airplanes should go to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, not to the scientists who have invented or created the so-called wonderful products. The first consideration is the intelligence of the scientist; one must be elevated by the dictation of the Supreme Lord, who says in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “From Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness.” Because the Supreme Lord, as Supersoul, sits within the core of every living entity’s heart, the dictation by which one advances in scientific knowledge or creative faculties comes from Him. Furthermore, the ingredients to manufacture wonderful machines like airplanes are also supplied by the Lord, not by the scientists. Before the airplane was created, its ingredients already existed, having been caused by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but when the manifested creation of the airplane is ruined, the remaining debris is a problem for the so-called creators. Another example is that the West is creating many automobiles. The ingredients for these cars are supplied, of course, by the Supreme Lord, and the intelligence for the so-called creation is also supplied by the Lord. Ultimately, when the cars are demolished, the so-called creators are faced with the problem of what to do with their ingredients. The actual creator, the original creator, is the Personality of Godhead. Only in the interim does someone create something with intelligence supplied by the Lord, and later the creation again becomes a problem. Therefore the so-called creator is not to be credited with the act of creation; the only credit goes to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is rightly stated herein that the credit for all the opulences of creation, maintenance and annihilation belongs to the Supreme Lord, not to the living entities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! Creation, maintenance and destruction of the universe is your greatness. The creators of the universe, portions of portions of you, compete in vain, thinking themselves separate from you. Having explained the mutual control that the Lord and the devotee have over each other, Citraketu now explains the powers of the Lord in three verses. Vibhavaḥ means greatness. Creation and destruction are your greatness. “But we see that Brahmā and others create the universe.” Those creates are only portions of portions of you. “But Brahmā and Śiva are devotees. They compete in establishing the lordship of their masters.” That competition is useless because they identify with a particular body: I am Brahmā, I am Śiva, I am the sun god.
Cosmic creation, maintenance, annihilation are Your opulences — Brahmā and others are partial portions of a portion. The hierarchy is huge; we are tiny — and that is good news, not bad.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I find the hierarchy oppressive when it could be a relief?
  • What does being small in the right system mean for my responsibility?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.36

↗
परमाणुपरममहतो- स्त्वमाद्यन्तान्तरवर्ती त्रयविधुर: । आदावन्तेऽपि च सत्त्वानां यद् ध्रुवं तदेवान्तरालेऽपि ॥ ३६ ॥
paramāṇu-parama-mahatos
[paramaanu-parama-mahatos]
tvam ādy-antāntara-vartī traya-vidhuraḥ
[tvam aady-antaantara-vartee traya-vidhurah]
ādāv ante ’pi ca sattvānāṁ
[aadaav ante ’pi cha sattvaanaam]
yad dhruvaṁ tad evāntarāle ’pi
[yad dhruvam tad evaantaraale ’pi]
parama-aṇu — of the atomic particle parama-mahatoḥ — and of the biggest (the result of the combination of atoms) tvam — You ādi-anta — in both the beginning and the end antara — and in the middle vartī — existing traya-vidhuraḥ — although without beginning, end or middle ādau — in the beginning ante — at the end api — also ca — and sattvānām — of all existences yat — which dhruvam — permanent tat — that eva — certainly antarāle — in the middle api — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
paramāṇu-parama-mahatos
parama-aṇu
of the atomic particle
parama-mahatoḥ
and of the biggest (the result of the combination of atoms)
tvam ādy-antāntara-vartī traya-vidhuraḥ
tvam
You
ādi-anta
in both the beginning and the end
antara
and in the middle
vartī
existing
traya-vidhuraḥ
although without beginning, end or middle
ādāv ante ’pi ca sattvānāṁ
ādau
in the beginning
ante
at the end
api
also
ca
and
sattvānām
of all existences
yad dhruvaṁ tad evāntarāle ’pi
yat
which
dhruvam
permanent
tat
that
eva
certainly
antarāle
in the middle
api
also.
You exist in the beginning, middle and end of everything, from the most minute particle of the cosmic manifestation — the atom — to the gigantic universes and total material energy. Nonetheless, You are eternal, having no beginning, end or middle. You are perceived to exist in these three phases, and thus You are permanent. When the cosmic manifestation does not exist, You exist as the original potency.

The Brahma-saṁhitā (5.33) says:

advaitam acyutam anādim ananta-rūpam ādyaṁ purāṇa-puruṣaṁ nava-yauvanaṁ ca vedeṣu durlabham adurlabham ātma-bhaktau govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

“I worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Govinda [Kṛṣṇa], who is the original person — absolute, infallible, without beginning, although expanded into unlimited forms, still the same original, the oldest, and the person always appearing as a fresh youth. Such eternal, blissful, all-knowing forms of the Lord cannot be understood even by the best Vedic scholars, but they are always manifest to pure, unalloyed devotees.” The Supreme Personality of Godhead has no cause, for He is the cause of everything. The Lord is beyond the workings of cause and effect. He is eternally existing. In another verse the Brahma-saṁhitā says, aṇḍāntara-stha-paramāṇu-cayāntara-stham: the Lord exists within the gigantic universe and within the atom. The descent of the Lord into the atom and the universe indicates that without His presence, nothing could factually exist. Scientists say that water is a combination of hydrogen and oxygen, but when they see a vast ocean they are puzzled about where such a quantity of hydrogen and oxygen could have come from. They think that everything evolved from chemicals, but where did the chemicals come from? That they do not know. Since the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the cause of all causes, He can produce immense quantities of chemicals to create a situation for chemical evolution. We actually see that chemicals are produced from living entities. For example, a lemon tree produces many tons of citric acid. The citric acid is not the cause of the tree; rather, the tree is the cause of the acid. Similarly, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the cause of everything. He is the cause of the tree that produces the citric acid ( bījaṁ māṁ sarva-bhūtānām ). Devotees can see that the original potencies causing the cosmic manifestation are not in chemicals but in the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for He is the cause of the chemicals.

Everything is caused or manifested by the energy of the Supreme Lord, and when everything is annihilated or dissolved, the original potency enters the body of the Supreme Lord. Therefore this verse says, ādāv ante ’pi ca sattvānāṁ yad dhruvaṁ tad evāntarāle ’pi. The word dhruvam means “permanent.” The permanent reality is Kṛṣṇa, not this cosmic manifestation. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, aham ādir hi devānām and mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate: Kṛṣṇa is the original cause of everything. Arjuna recognized Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa as the original person ( puruṣaṁ śāśvataṁ divyam ādi-devam ajaṁ vibhum ), and the Brahma-saṁhitā describes Him as the original person ( govindam ādi-puruṣam ). He is the cause of all causes, whether at the beginning, at the end or in the middle.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The subtle cause and the gross effect of this universe belong to you. You exist in the beginning, in the middle and in the end, but you are without beginning, middle and end, since you are fixed amidst the beginning middle and end of all products. You are the creator, the real, permanent form. You are the first cause, most subtle (paramāṇu) and the final great effect (parama-mahatoḥ). You exist in the beginning, in the middle and in the end. But you are devoid of beginning, middle and end because you are eternal. You are steady as the cause of all effects (sattvānām) in the beginning, end and middle, like gold in relation to gold ornaments. Therefore you are the cause of all things, the permanent object, whereas everything else is a product, and therefore a temporary object.
You exist in beginning, middle and end of everything from atom to universal energy — Yet You are eternal, without beginning, end, or middle. The Lord pervades time without being timed.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse pervading-time with being-inside-time?
  • What practice helps me sense the Lord's pervasion?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.37

↗
क्षित्यादिभिरेष किलावृत: सप्तभिर्दशगुणोत्तरैरण्डकोश: । यत्र पतत्यणुकल्प: सहाण्डकोटिकोटिभिस्तदनन्त: ॥ ३७ ॥
kṣity-ādibhir eṣa kilāvṛtaḥ
[kshity-aadibhir esha kilaavritah]
saptabhir daśa-guṇottarair aṇḍa-kośaḥ
[saptabhir dasha-gunottarair anda-koshah]
yatra pataty aṇu-kalpaḥ
[yatra pataty anu-kalpah]
sahāṇḍa-koṭi-koṭibhis tad anantaḥ
[sahaanda-koti-kotibhis tad anantah]
kṣiti-ādibhiḥ — by the ingredients of the material world, headed by earth eṣaḥ — this kila — indeed āvṛtaḥ — covered saptabhiḥ — seven daśa-guṇa-uttaraiḥ — each ten times more than the previous one aṇḍa-kośaḥ — egg-shaped universe yatra — in whom patati — falls aṇu-kalpaḥ — like a minute atom saha — with aṇḍa-koṭi-koṭibhiḥ — millions of such universes tat — therefore anantaḥ — (You are called) unlimited.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṣity-ādibhir eṣa kilāvṛtaḥ
kṣiti-ādibhiḥ
by the ingredients of the material world, headed by earth
eṣaḥ
this
kila
indeed
āvṛtaḥ
covered
saptabhir daśa-guṇottarair aṇḍa-kośaḥ
saptabhiḥ
seven
daśa-guṇa-uttaraiḥ
each ten times more than the previous one
aṇḍa-kośaḥ
egg-shaped universe
yatra pataty aṇu-kalpaḥ
yatra
in whom
patati
falls
aṇu-kalpaḥ
like a minute atom
sahāṇḍa-koṭi-koṭibhis tad anantaḥ
saha
with
aṇḍa-koṭi-koṭibhiḥ
millions of such universes
tat
therefore
anantaḥ
(You are called) unlimited.
Every universe is covered by seven layers — earth, water, fire, air, sky, the total energy and false ego — each ten times greater than the previous one. There are innumerable universes besides this one, and although they are unlimitedly large, they move about like atoms in You. Therefore You are called unlimited [ananta].

The Brahma-saṁhitā (5.48) says:

yasyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagad-aṇḍa-nāthāḥ viṣṇur mahān sa iha yasya kalā-viśeṣo govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

The origin of the material creation is Mahā-Viṣṇu, who lies in the Causal Ocean. While He sleeps in that ocean, millions of universes are generated as He exhales, and they are all annihilated when He inhales. This Mahā-Viṣṇu is a plenary portion of a portion of Viṣṇu, Govinda ( yasya kalā-viśeṣaḥ ). The word kalā refers to a plenary portion of a plenary portion. From Kṛṣṇa, or Govinda, comes Balarāma; from Balarāma comes Saṅkarṣaṇa; from Saṅkarṣaṇa, Nārāyaṇa; from Nārāyaṇa, the second Saṅkarṣaṇa; from the second Saṅkarṣaṇa, Mahā-Viṣṇu; from Mahā-Viṣṇu, Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu; and from Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu. Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu controls every universe. This gives an idea of the meaning of ananta, unlimited. What is to be said of the unlimited potency and existence of the Lord? This verse describes the coverings of the universe ( saptabhir daśa-guṇottarair aṇḍa-kośaḥ ). The first covering is earth, the second is water, the third is fire, the fourth is air, the fifth is sky, the sixth is the total material energy, and the seventh is the false ego. Beginning with the covering of earth, each covering is ten times greater than the previous one. Thus we can only imagine how great each universe is, and there are many millions of universes. As confirmed by the Lord Himself in Bhagavad-gītā (10.42) :

athavā bahunaitena kiṁ jñātena tavārjuna viṣṭabhyāham idaṁ kṛtsnam ekāṁśena sthito jagat

“But what need is there, Arjuna, for all this detailed knowledge? With a single fragment of Myself I pervade and support this entire universe.” The entire material world manifests only one fourth of the Supreme Lord’s energy. Therefore He is called ananta.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The universe covered by seven layers each ten times thicker than the previous layer, wanders about like an atom along with billions of other universes inside of you. Therefore you are unlimited. The Lord has bee described as existing in all time. Now he is described as existing in all space. The universe is surrounded by seven layers of earth, water, fire, ether, ahaṅkāra, mahat-tattva and prakṛti, [Note: In this list air is missing.] each ten times thicker than the previous layer. The universe moves about in you (yatra). Therefore you are unlimited.
Every universe is covered by seven layers; innumerable universes appear like dust particles in You. Cosmology dwarfs everything we take seriously and contextualizes our worry.
Reflection Questions
  • What worry of mine shrinks against this scale?
  • Could that scale comfort me without dismissing the worry?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.38

↗
विषयतृषो नरपशवो य उपासते विभूतीर्न परं त्वाम् । तेषामाशिष ईश तदनु विनश्यन्ति यथा राजकुलम् ॥ ३८ ॥
viṣaya-tṛṣo nara-paśavo
[vishaya-trisho nara-pashavo]
ya upāsate vibhūtīr na paraṁ tvām
[ya upaasate vibhooteer na param tvaam]
teṣām āśiṣa īśa
[teshaam aashisha eesha]
tad anu vinaśyanti yathā rāja-kulam
[tad anu vinashyanti yathaa raaja-kulam]
viṣaya-tṛṣaḥ — eager to enjoy sense gratification nara-paśavaḥ — manlike animals ye — who upāsate — worship very gorgeously vibhūtīḥ — small particles of the Supreme Lord (the demigods) na — not param — the Supreme tvām — You teṣām — of them āśiṣaḥ — the benedictions īśa — O supreme controller tat — them (the demigods) anu — after vinaśyanti — will be vanquished yathā — just as rāja-kulam — those who are supported by the government (when the government is finished).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣaya-tṛṣo nara-paśavo
viṣaya-tṛṣaḥ
eager to enjoy sense gratification
nara-paśavaḥ
manlike animals
ye
who
ya upāsate vibhūtīr na paraṁ tvām
upāsate
worship very gorgeously
vibhūtīḥ
small particles of the Supreme Lord (the demigods)
na
not
param
the Supreme
tvām
You
teṣām āśiṣa īśa
teṣām
of them
āśiṣaḥ
the benedictions
īśa
O supreme controller
tad anu vinaśyanti yathā rāja-kulam
tat
them (the demigods)
anu
after
vinaśyanti
will be vanquished
yathā
just as
rāja-kulam
those who are supported by the government (when the government is finished).
O Lord, O Supreme, unintelligent persons who thirst for sense enjoyment and who worship various demigods are no better than animals in the human form of life. Because of their animalistic propensities, they fail to worship Your Lordship, and instead they worship the insignificant demigods, who are but small sparks of Your glory. With the destruction of the entire universe, including the demigods, the benedictions received from the demigods also vanish, just like the nobility when a king is no longer in power.

Bhagavad-gītā (7.20) says, kāmais tais tair hṛta jñānāḥ prapadyante ’nya-devatāḥ: “Those whose minds are distorted by material desires surrender unto the demigods.” Similarly, this verse condemns worship of the demigods. We may show our respect to the demigods, but the demigods are not worshipable. The intelligence of those who worship the demigods is lost ( hṛta jñānāḥ ) because these worshipers do not know that when the entire material cosmic manifestation is annihilated, the demigods, who are the departmental heads of that manifestation, will be vanquished. When the demigods are vanquished, the benedictions given by the demigods to unintelligent men will also be vanquished. Therefore a devotee should not hanker to obtain material opulence by worshiping the demigods, but should engage in the service of the Lord, who will satisfy all his desires.

akāmaḥ sarva-kāmo vā mokṣa-kāma udāra-dhīḥ tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena yajeta puruṣaṁ param

“Whether full of all material desires, free from material desires or desiring liberation, a person who has broader intelligence must by all means worship the supreme whole, the Personality of Godhead.” ( Bhāg. 2.3.10 ) This is the duty of a perfect human being. One who has the shape of a human being but whose actions are nothing but those of an animal is called nara-paśu or dvipada-paśu, a two-legged animal. A human being who is not interested in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is condemned herewith as a nara-paśu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! The blessings given to animal-like men thirsty for material pleasure, who worship devatās and not you, are destroyed when the devatās are destroyed, just as the blessings of a king upon his servants disappear when the king’s dynasty disappears. After glorifying the Lord the devotee is glorified. But first the non-devotee is criticized. Vibhūtīḥ means the devatās. They worship devatās and not you. After the destruction of the devatās, their blessings also disappear. When the family of a king disappears, the blessings given by the family to the servants also disappears.
Related verses
Unintelligent persons who worship various demigods for sense enjoyment are no better than animals in human form. Worship-without-direction is a category of failure.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my worship pointed at outcomes rather than at the Lord?
  • What would re-aiming look like this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.39

↗
कामधियस्त्वयि रचिता न परम रोहन्ति यथा करम्भबीजानि । ज्ञानात्मन्यगुणमये गुणगणतोऽस्य द्वन्द्वजालानि ॥ ३९ ॥
kāma-dhiyas tvayi racitā
[kaama-dhiyas tvayi rachitaa]
na parama rohanti yathā karambha-bījāni
[na parama rohanti yathaa karambha-beejaani]
jñānātmany aguṇamaye
[jnaanaatmany agunamaye]
guṇa-gaṇato ’sya dvandva-jālāni
[guna-ganato ’sya dvandva-jaalaani]
kāma-dhiyaḥ — desires for sense gratification tvayi — in You racitāḥ — performed na — not parama — O Supreme Personality of Godhead rohanti — do grow (produce other bodies) yathā — just as karambha-bījāni — sterilized or fried seeds jñāna-ātmani — in You, whose existence is in full knowledge aguṇa-maye — who is not affected by the material qualities guṇa-gaṇataḥ — from the material qualities asya — of a person dvandva-jālāni — the networks of duality.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāma-dhiyas tvayi racitā
kāma-dhiyaḥ
desires for sense gratification
tvayi
in You
racitāḥ
performed
na parama rohanti yathā karambha-bījāni
na
not
parama
O Supreme Personality of Godhead
rohanti
do grow (produce other bodies)
yathā
just as
karambha-bījāni
sterilized or fried seeds
jñānātmany aguṇamaye
jñāna-ātmani
in You, whose existence is in full knowledge
aguṇa-maye
who is not affected by the material qualities
guṇa-gaṇato ’sya dvandva-jālāni
guṇa-gaṇataḥ
from the material qualities
asya
of a person
dvandva-jālāni
the networks of duality.
O Supreme Lord, if persons obsessed with material desires for sense gratification through material opulence worship You, who are the source of all knowledge and are transcendental to material qualities, they are not subject to material rebirth, just as sterilized or fried seeds do not produce plants. Living entities are subjected to the repetition of birth and death because they are conditioned by material nature, but since You are transcendental, one who is inclined to associate with You in transcendence escapes the conditions of material nature.

This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (4.9) , wherein the Lord says:

janma karma ca me divyam evaṁ yo vetti tattvataḥ tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti so ’rjuna

“One who knows the transcendental nature of My appearance and activities does not, upon leaving the body, take his birth again in this material world, but attains My eternal abode, O Arjuna.” If one simply engages in Kṛṣṇa consciousness to understand Kṛṣṇa, he surely becomes immune to the process of repeated birth and death. As clearly stated in Bhagavad-gītā, tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti: such a person, simply by engaging in Kṛṣṇa consciousness or understanding the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, becomes quite fit to return home, back to Godhead. Even those who are obsessed with material desires may also come to worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead so steadily that they go back to Godhead. The fact is that if one comes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, although he may have many material desires, he becomes increasingly attracted to the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa through associating with the Supreme Lord by chanting His holy name. The Supreme Lord and His holy name are identical. Thus he becomes uninterested in attachment to material enjoyment. The perfection of life is to be uninterested in material enjoyment and interested in Kṛṣṇa. If one comes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness somehow or other, even for material gain, the result is that he will be liberated. Kāmād dveṣād bhayāt snehāt. Whether for the satisfaction of material desires, because of the influence of envy, because of fear, because of affection or because of any other reason, if one comes to Kṛṣṇa, his life is successful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Supreme Lord! Desires for material pleasure, directed to you, who are composed of spiritual knowledge and are different from the material guṇas, do not produce further material bodies, just as roasted seeds do not grow. The networks of duality causing rebirth arise from the material guṇas. This verse shows the excellence of the devotee by kaimutika-nyāya. If desires for kingdom or other things are placed in you, then they will not result in getting another birth, just as roasted seeds do not sprout. This is because those objects take on good qualities. But if the desires are placed elsewhere (in other objects of worship), they sprout up. They are not like roasted seeds. You are pure spiritual knowledge (jñānātmani) devoid of material objects (aguṇa-maye). Just as an object which falls in a well of juice becomes juicy, when those material desires enter you, they become spiritual. How then can they be a cause of continued saṁsāra? The nets of duality arising from the guṇas are causes of saṁsāra.
Even materialistic persons who worship You, the source of knowledge, are not subject to rebirth; You will give what they want and yet uplift them. Wrong worship of the right Lord still works better than right worship of the wrong target.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could I worship Kṛṣṇa even with imperfect motives and let His mercy do the rest?
  • What is the smaller, honest desire I could offer Him now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.40

↗
जितमजित तदा भवता यदाह भागवतं धर्ममनवद्यम् । निष्किञ्चना ये मुनय आत्मारामा यमुपासतेऽपवर्गाय ॥ ४० ॥
jitam ajita tadā bhavatā
[jitam ajita tadaa bhavataa]
yadāha bhāgavataṁ dharmam anavadyam
[yadaaha bhaagavatam dharmam anavadyam]
niṣkiñcanā ye munaya
[nishkinchanaa ye munaya]
ātmārāmā yam upāsate ’pavargāya
[aatmaaraamaa yam upaasate ’pavargaaya]
jitam — conquered ajita — O unconquerable one tadā — then bhavatā — by Your Lordship yadā — when āha — spoke bhāgavatam — which helps the devotee approach the Supreme Personality of Godhead dharmam — the religious process anavadyam — faultless (free from contamination) niṣkiñcanāḥ — who have no desire to be happy with material opulences ye — those who munayaḥ — great philosophers and exalted sages ātma-ārāmāḥ — who are self-satisfied (being completely aware of their constitutional position as eternal servants of the Lord) yam — whom upāsate — worship apavargāya — for achieving liberation from material bondage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jitam ajita tadā bhavatā
jitam
conquered
ajita
O unconquerable one
tadā
then
bhavatā
by Your Lordship
yadāha bhāgavataṁ dharmam anavadyam
yadā
when
āha
spoke
bhāgavatam
which helps the devotee approach the Supreme Personality of Godhead
dharmam
the religious process
anavadyam
faultless (free from contamination)
niṣkiñcanā ye munaya
niṣkiñcanāḥ
who have no desire to be happy with material opulences
ye
those who
munayaḥ
great philosophers and exalted sages
ātmārāmā yam upāsate ’pavargāya
ātma-ārāmāḥ
who are self-satisfied (being completely aware of their constitutional position as eternal servants of the Lord)
yam
whom
upāsate
worship
apavargāya
for achieving liberation from material bondage.
O unconquerable one, when You spoke about bhāgavata-dharma, which is the uncontaminated religious system for achieving the shelter of Your lotus feet, that was Your victory. Persons who have no material desires, like the Kumāras, who are self-satisfied sages, worship You to be liberated from material contamination. In other words, they accept the process of bhāgavata-dharma to achieve shelter at Your lotus feet.

As stated by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu:

anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānu- śīlanaṁ bhaktir uttamā

“One should render transcendental loving service to the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa favorably and without desires for material profit or gain through fruitive activities or philosophical speculation. That is called pure devotional service.”

The Nārada-pañcarātra also says:

sarvopādhi-vinirmuktaṁ tat-paratvena nirmalam hṛṣīkeṇa hṛṣīkeśa- sevanaṁ bhaktir ucyate

“One should be free from all material designations and cleansed of all material contamination. He should be restored to his pure identity, in which he engages his senses in the service of the proprietor of the senses. That is called devotional service.” This is also called bhāgavata-dharma. Without material aspirations, one should simply serve Kṛṣṇa, as advised in Bhagavad-gītā, Nārada-pañcarātra and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Bhāgavata-dharma is the process of religion enunciated by pure devotees, direct representatives of the Supreme Personality of Godhead like Nārada, Śukadeva Gosvāmī and their humble servants in the disciplic succession. By understanding bhāgavata-dharma, one immediately becomes free from material contamination. Living entities, who are part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, are loitering in this material world suffering. When they are instructed by the Lord Himself about bhāgavata-dharma and they adopt it, that is victory for the Lord, for He then reclaims these fallen souls. A devotee following the principles of bhāgavata-dharma feels very much obligated to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He can understand the difference between life without bhāgavata-dharma and life with bhāgavata-dharma and thus he ever remains obliged to the Lord. Taking to Kṛṣṇa consciousness and bringing fallen souls to Kṛṣṇa consciousness is victory for Lord Kṛṣṇa.

sa vai puṁsāṁ paro dharmo yato bhaktir adhokṣaje ahaituky apratihatā yayātmā suprasīdati

“The supreme occupation [ dharma ] for all humanity is that by which men can attain to loving devotional service unto the transcendent Lord. Such devotional service must be unmotivated and uninterrupted in order to completely satisfy the self.” ( Bhāg. 1.2.6 ) Therefore Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the pure transcendental process of religion.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O unconquered Lord! When you spoke about pure bhakti, the path which the devotees who meditate on you and enjoy in you follow for attaining prema, the devotees were conquered by you. If this is the excellence of bhakti with material desires because of your power, then who much more bhakti without material desires will yield! (This is the kaimutika.) However, this niṣkāma-bhakti is instigated by you. Your victory over your devotees who are niṣkāma mentioned in verse 34 is caused by you, who are so merciful, and desire to be controlled by your devotee. That is your special victory. That is explained in this verse. O unconquered Lord! When you spoke about niṣkāma (anavadyam) dharma of the devotees, the devotees became indebted to you. You were conquered by devotees through that niṣkāma-bhakti, but that bhakti was spoken by you. That is your good quality. Thus the devotees are indebted to you. Those who were pure from the beginning (niṣkiñcanāḥ), as well as those sages (munayah) who by association with the pure devotees gave up their previous ideas, and some jīvanmuktas (ātmārāmāḥ) who achieved their position by austerity, follow that dharma. Or the two words munayaḥ and ātmā-rāmāh can modify niṣkiñcanāḥ. The pure devotees who continually contemplated you, and derived pleasure from you, follow this dharma. Apavargāya here means “for that goal to which the four vargas of artha, dharma, kāma and mokṣa are inferior.” That means prema. Or apavarga can mean bhakti as in the prose of the Fifth Canto: yo 'sau bhagavati sarva-bhūtātmany anātmye 'nirukte 'nilayane paramātmani vāsudeve 'nanya-nimitta-bhakti-yoga-lakṣaṇo nānā-gati-nimittāvidyā-granthi-randhana-dvāreṇa yadā hi mahā-puruṣa-puruṣa-prasaṅgaḥ. Liberation (apavarga), whose essential nature is unmotivated bhakti-yoga to the Lord full of qualities, who attracts the minds of all beings, who is not the object of merging, who is not described by material words, who remains beyond destruction of the universe, who is the most excellent ātmā, who is the son of Vasudeva, takes place by destruction of the knot of ignorance which causes various material goals, when there is association with devotees of the Lord. SB 5.19.20
Related verses
When You spoke of bhāgavata-dharma — the uncontaminated religious system — that was Your victory. The Kumāras and others are silently engaged in it. The Lord's victory was a teaching, not a battle.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'speaking' of mine could be a victory rather than a complaint?
  • Whose silent practice am I missing because there is no fanfare?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.41

↗
विषममतिर्न यत्र नृणां त्वमहमिति मम तवेति च यदन्यत्र । विषमधिया रचितो य: स ह्यविशुद्ध: क्षयिष्णुरधर्मबहुल: ॥ ४१ ॥
viṣama-matir na yatra nṛṇāṁ
[vishama-matir na yatra nrinaam]
tvam aham iti mama taveti ca yad anyatra
[tvam aham iti mama taveti cha yad anyatra]
viṣama-dhiyā racito yaḥ
[vishama-dhiyaa rachito yah]
sa hy aviśuddhaḥ kṣayiṣṇur adharma-bahulaḥ
[sa hy avishuddhah kshayishnur adharma-bahulah]
viṣama — unequal (your religion, my religion matiḥ — consciousness na — not yatra — in which nṛṇām — of human society tvam — you aham — I iti — thus mama — my tava — your iti — thus ca — also yat — which anyatra — elsewhere (in religious systems other than bhāgavata-dharma) viṣama-dhiyā — by this unequal intelligence racitaḥ — made yaḥ — that which saḥ — that system of religion hi — indeed aviśuddhaḥ — not pure kṣayiṣṇuḥ — temporary adharma-bahulaḥ — full of irreligion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣama-matir na yatra nṛṇāṁ
viṣama
unequal (your religion, my religion
matiḥ
consciousness
na
not
yatra
in which
nṛṇām
of human society
tvam aham iti mama taveti ca yad anyatra
tvam
you
aham
I
iti
thus
mama
my
tava
your
viṣama-dhiyā racito yaḥ
iti
thus
ca
also
yat
which
anyatra
elsewhere (in religious systems other than bhāgavata-dharma)
sa hy aviśuddhaḥ kṣayiṣṇur adharma-bahulaḥ
viṣama-dhiyā
by this unequal intelligence
racitaḥ
made
yaḥ
that which
saḥ
that system of religion
hi
indeed
aviśuddhaḥ
not pure
kṣayiṣṇuḥ
temporary
adharma-bahulaḥ
full of irreligion.
Being full of contradictions, all forms of religion but bhāgavata-dharma work under conceptions of fruitive results and distinctions of “you and I” and “yours and mine.” The followers of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam have no such consciousness. They are all Kṛṣṇa conscious, thinking that they are Kṛṣṇa’s and Kṛṣṇa is theirs. There are other, low-class religious systems, which are contemplated for the killing of enemies or the gain of mystic power, but such religious systems, being full of passion and envy, are impure and temporary. Because they are full of envy, they are full of irreligion.

Bhāgavata-dharma has no contradictions. Conceptions of “your religion” and “my religion” are completely absent from bhāgavata-dharma. Bhāgavata-dharma means following the orders given by the Supreme Lord, Bhagavān, as stated in Bhagavad-gītā: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. God is one, and God is for everyone. Therefore everyone must surrender to God. That is the pure conception of religion. Whatever God orders constitutes religion ( dharmaṁ tu sākṣād bhagavat-praṇītam ). In bhāgavata-dharma there is no question of “what you believe” and “what I believe.” Everyone must believe in the Supreme Lord and carry out His orders. Ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānuśīlanam: whatever Kṛṣṇa says — whatever God says — should be directly carried out. That is dharma, religion.

If one is actually Kṛṣṇa conscious, he cannot have any enemies. Since his only engagement is to induce others to surrender to Kṛṣṇa, or God, how can he have enemies? If one advocates the Hindu religion, the Muslim religion, the Christian religion, this religion or that religion, there will be conflicts. History shows that the followers of religious systems without a clear conception of God have fought with one another. There are many instances of this in human history, but systems of religion that do not concentrate upon service to the Supreme are temporary and cannot last for long because they are full of envy. There are many activities directed against such religious systems, and therefore one must give up the idea of “my belief” and “your belief.” Everyone should believe in God and surrender unto Him. That is bhāgavata-dharma.

Bhāgavata-dharma is not a concocted sectarian belief, for it entails research to find how everything is connected with Kṛṣṇa ( īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvam ). According to the Vedic injunctions, sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma: Brahman, the Supreme, is present in everything. Bhāgavata-dharma captures this presence of the Supreme. Bhāgavata-dharma does not consider everything in the world to be false. Because everything emanates from the Supreme, nothing can be false. Everything has some use in the service of the Supreme. For example, we are now dictating into a microphone and recording on a dictating machine, and thus we are finding how the machine can be connected to the Supreme Brahman. Since we are using this machine in the service of the Lord, it is Brahman. This is the meaning of sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. Everything is Brahman because everything can be used for the service of the Supreme Lord. Nothing is mithyā, false; everything is factual.

Bhāgavata-dharma is called sarvotkṛṣṭa, the best of all religious systems, because those who follow bhāgavata-dharma are not envious of anyone. Pure bhāgavatas, pure devotees, invite everyone, without envy, to join the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. A devotee is therefore exactly like the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Suhṛdaṁ sarva-bhūtānām: he is the friend of all living entities. Therefore this is the best of all religious systems. Whereas so-called religions are meant for a particular type of person who believes in a particular way, such discrimination has no place in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or bhāgavata-dharma. If we scrutinize the religious systems meant for worship of demigods or anyone else but the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we will find that they are full of envy and therefore impure.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In bhakti-yoga there is no conception of difference such as you and I, yours and mine. In kāmya-dharma however the conception of differences is produced. That dharma is impure, perishable and full of violence. In bhakti-yoga there are no conceptions of you and I, I and mine. The next verse speaks of the mentality of difference caused by hatred: this is mine, this is yours, I am this, you are that, this is my enemy. Other than this bhakti-yoga, in dharma for material goals, conceptions of difference are produced, such as the desire to kill an enemy. Kāmya-dharma is criticized. That dharma is impure, since it is made of attraction and hatred, and it is subject to destruction, since its results are temporary. It is full of adharma, since violence is prominent. Śavara Svāmī has said ubhayam iha codanāyāṁ lakṣyate artho ’narthaś ca: dharma and adharma are seen in the rules for kāmya-dharma.
All systems but bhāgavata-dharma are full of 'you and I,' 'yours and mine'; followers of the Bhāgavatam have no such consciousness. Possession-language is itself a marker of where we are.
Reflection Questions
  • How often do 'mine' and 'yours' structure my day?
  • What practice could begin to dissolve that ownership-grammar?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.42

↗
क: क्षेमो निजपरयो: कियान्वार्थ: स्वपरद्रुहा धर्मेण । स्वद्रोहात्तव कोप: परसम्पीडया च तथाधर्म: ॥ ४२ ॥
kaḥ kṣemo nija-parayoḥ
[kah kshemo nija-parayoh]
kiyān vārthaḥ sva-para-druhā dharmeṇa
[kiyaan vaarthah sva-para-druhaa dharmena]
sva-drohāt tava kopaḥ
[sva-drohaat tava kopah]
para-sampīḍayā ca tathādharmaḥ
[para-sampeedayaa cha tathaadharmah]
kaḥ — what kṣemaḥ — benefit nija — to oneself parayoḥ — and to others kiyān — how much vā — or arthaḥ — purpose sva-para-druhā — which is envious of the performer and of others dharmeṇa — with the religious system sva-drohāt — from being envious of one’s own self tava — of You kopaḥ — anger para-sampīḍayā — by giving pain to others ca — also tathā — as well as adharmaḥ — irreligion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaḥ kṣemo nija-parayoḥ
kaḥ
what
kṣemaḥ
benefit
nija
to oneself
parayoḥ
and to others
kiyān vārthaḥ sva-para-druhā dharmeṇa
kiyān
how much
vā
or
arthaḥ
purpose
sva-para-druhā
which is envious of the performer and of others
dharmeṇa
with the religious system
sva-drohāt tava kopaḥ
sva-drohāt
from being envious of one’s own self
tava
of You
kopaḥ
anger
para-sampīḍayā ca tathādharmaḥ
para-sampīḍayā
by giving pain to others
ca
also
tathā
as well as
adharmaḥ
irreligion.
How can a religious system that produces envy of one’s self and of others be beneficial for oneself and for them? What is auspicious about following such a system? What is actually to be gained? By causing pain to one’s own self due to self-envy and by causing pain to others, one arouses Your anger and practices irreligion.

Any religious system but the process of bhāgavata-dharma — service as an eternal servant of the Supreme Personality of Godhead — is a system of envy of one’s own self and of others. For example, there are many systems of religion in which animal sacrifices are recommended. Such animal sacrifices are inauspicious both for the performer and for the animal. Although one is sometimes permitted to sacrifice an animal before the goddess Kālī and eat it instead of purchasing meat from a slaughterhouse, permission to eat meat after a sacrifice in the presence of the goddess Kālī is not the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is simply a concession for the miserable person who will not give up eating meat. It is meant to restrict his desire for unrestricted meat-eating. Such a religious system is condemned. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja: “Give up all other duties and surrender unto Me.” That is the last word in religion.

One may argue that the sacrifice of animals is recommended in the Vedas. This recommendation, however, is a restriction. Without Vedic restrictions on the purchase of meat, people will purchase meat from the market, which will be overflooded with meat shops, and slaughterhouses will increase. To restrict this, sometimes the Vedas say that one may eat meat after sacrificing an insignificant animal like a goat before the goddess Kālī. In any case, a system of religion in which animal sacrifices are recommended is inauspicious for those who perform the sacrifices and for the animals. Envious persons who perform ostentatious animal sacrifices are condemned in Bhagavad-gītā (16.17) as follows:

ātma-sambhāvitāḥ stabdhā dhana-māna-madānvitāḥ yajante nāma-yajñais te dambhenāvidhi-pūrvakam

“Self-complacent and always impudent, deluded by wealth and false prestige, they sometimes perform sacrifices in name only without following any rules or regulations.” Sometimes animal sacrifices are performed very gorgeously with grand arrangements for worshiping the goddess Kālī, but such festivals, although performed in the name of yajña, are not actually yajña, for yajña means to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore it is recommended that in this age specifically, yajñaiḥ saṅkīrtana-prāyair yajanti hi sumedhasaḥ: those who have good intelligence satisfy the yajña-puruṣa, Viṣṇu, by chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra. Envious persons, however, are condemned by the Supreme Personality of Godhead as follows:

ahaṅkāraṁ balaṁ darpaṁ kāmaṁ krodhaṁ ca saṁśritāḥ mām ātma-para-deheṣu pradviṣanto ’bhyasūyakāḥ

tān ahaṁ dviṣataḥ krūrān saṁsāreṣu narādhamān kṣipāmy ajasram aśubhān āsurīṣv eva yoniṣu

“Bewildered by false ego, strength, pride, lust and anger, the demon becomes envious of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is situated in his own body and in the bodies of others, and blasphemes against the real religion. Those who are envious and mischievous, who are the lowest among men, are cast by Me into the ocean of material existence, into various demoniac species of life.” (Bg. 16.18-19) These persons are condemned by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as indicated by the words tava kopaḥ. A person who commits murder is envious of himself and also the person he has killed, for the result of committing murder is that he will be arrested and hanged. If one transgresses the laws of a man-made government, he may escape being killed by the state, but one cannot escape the laws of God. A killer of any animal must be killed in his next life by the same animal. This is the law of nature. One must follow the instructions of the Supreme Lord: sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. If one follows any other system of religion, he is subject to punishment by the Supreme Personality of Godhead in many different ways. Therefore if one follows a concocted system of religion, he is envious not only of others but also of himself. Consequently his system of religion is useless.

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.8) says:

dharmaḥ svanuṣṭhitaḥ puṁsāṁ viṣvaksena-kathāsu yaḥ notpādayed yadi ratiṁ śrama eva hi kevalam

“Duties ( dharma ) executed by men, regardless of occupation, are only so much useless labor if they do not provoke attraction for the message of the Supreme Lord.” Following a system of religion that does not awaken one’s Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or God consciousness, is merely a waste of time and labor.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What is the benefit or goal of thinking of oneself and others as objects of one’s possession? That dharma causes violence to oneself and others, for by inflicting pain on one’s own body in the form of austerities in order to afflict enemies one develops anger and sin. The previous statement is made clear. What is the benefit of thinking oneself and other objects which are mine, such sons and wife? There is no benefit. By that there is violence to oneself and others, because by performing austerities which inflict pain on one’s body for committing violence to others, one becomes angry and becomes sinful (adharmaḥ).
Related verses
How can a religion that produces envy of self or others benefit anyone? Causing pain by self-condemnation while envying others is doubly unauspicious. A negative spiritual self-image is not the path.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has my 'religion' caused me self-condemnation or envy of others?
  • What practice would lead to neither?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.43

↗
न व्यभिचरति तवेक्षा यया ह्यभिहितो भागवतो धर्म: । स्थिरचरसत्त्वकदम्बे- ष्वपृथग्धियो यमुपासते त्वार्या: ॥ ४३ ॥
na vyabhicarati tavekṣā
[na vyabhicharati tavekshaa]
yayā hy abhihito bhāgavato dharmaḥ
[yayaa hy abhihito bhaagavato dharmah]
sthira-cara-sattva-kadambeṣv
[sthira-chara-sattva-kadambeshv]
apṛthag-dhiyo yam upāsate tv āryāḥ
[aprithag-dhiyo yam upaasate tv aaryaah]
na — not vyabhicarati — fails tava — Your īkṣā — outlook yayā — by which hi — indeed abhihitaḥ — declared bhāgavataḥ — in relationship with Your instructions and activities dharmaḥ — religious principle sthira — nonmoving cara — moving sattva-kadambeṣu — among the living entities apṛthak-dhiyaḥ — who do not consider distinctions yam — which upāsate — follow tu — certainly āryāḥ — those who are advanced in civilization.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na vyabhicarati tavekṣā
na
not
vyabhicarati
fails
tava
Your
īkṣā
outlook
yayā hy abhihito bhāgavato dharmaḥ
yayā
by which
hi
indeed
abhihitaḥ
declared
bhāgavataḥ
in relationship with Your instructions and activities
dharmaḥ
religious principle
sthira-cara-sattva-kadambeṣv
sthira
nonmoving
cara
moving
sattva-kadambeṣu
among the living entities
apṛthag-dhiyo yam upāsate tv āryāḥ
apṛthak-dhiyaḥ
who do not consider distinctions
yam
which
upāsate
follow
tu
certainly
āryāḥ
those who are advanced in civilization.
My dear Lord, one’s occupational duty is instructed in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Bhagavad-gītā according to Your point of view, which never deviates from the highest goal of life. Those who follow their occupational duties under Your supervision, being equal to all living entities, moving and nonmoving, and not considering high and low, are called Āryans. Such Āryans worship You, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Bhāgavata-dharma and kṛṣṇa-kathā are identical. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu wanted everyone to become a guru and preach the instructions of Kṛṣṇa everywhere from Bhagavad-gītā, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, the Purāṇas, Vedānta-sūtra and similar Vedic literatures. Āryans, who are advanced in civilization, follow bhāgavata-dharma. Prahlāda Mahārāja, although merely a child of five years, recommended:

kaumāra ācaret prājño dharmān bhāgavatān iha durlabhaṁ mānuṣaṁ janma tad apy adhruvam arthadam

( Bhāg. 7.6.1 )

Prahlāda Mahārāja preached bhāgavata-dharma among his classmates as soon as an opportunity was afforded by the absence of his teachers from the classroom. He said that from the very beginning of life, from the age of five, children should be instructed about bhāgavata-dharma because the human form of life, which is very rarely obtained, is meant for understanding this subject.

Bhāgavata-dharma means living according to the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In Bhagavad-gītā we find that the Supreme Lord has arranged human society in four social divisions, namely brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya and śūdra. Again, the Purāṇas and other Vedic literatures set forth four āśramas, which are the divisions of spiritual life. Therefore bhāgavata-dharma means the varṇāśrama-dharma of the four social and four spiritual divisions.

The members of human society who strictly follow the principles of bhāgavata-dharma and live according to the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are called Āryans or ārya. A civilization of Āryans who strictly follow the instructions of the Lord and never deviate from those instructions is perfect. Such civilized men do not discriminate between trees, animals, human beings and other living entities. Paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ: because they are completely educated in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they see all living beings equally. Āryans do not kill even a small plant unnecessarily, not to speak of cutting trees for sense gratification. At the present moment, throughout the world, killing is prominent. Men are killing trees, they are killing animals, and they are killing other human beings also, all for sense gratification. This is not an Āryan civilization. As stated here, sthira-cara-sattva-kadambeṣv apṛthag-dhiyaḥ. The word apṛthag-dhiyaḥ indicates that Āryans do not distinguish between lower and higher grades of life. All life should be protected. All living beings have a right to live, even the trees and plants. This is the basic principle of an Āryan civilization. Apart from the lower living entities, those who have come to the platform of human civilization should be divided into a society of brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas, vaiśyas and śūdras. The brāhmaṇas should follow the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead as stated in Bhagavad-gītā and other Vedic literatures. The criterion must be guṇa and karma. In other words, one should acquire the qualities of a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya or śūdra and act accordingly. This is the civilization accepted by the Āryans. Why do they accept it? They accept it because they are very much eager to satisfy Kṛṣṇa. This is perfect civilization.

Āryans do not deviate from the instructions of Kṛṣṇa, nor do they have doubts about Kṛṣṇa, but non-Āryans and other demoniac people fail to follow the instructions of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. This is because they have been trained in sense gratification at the cost of all other living entities. Nūnaṁ pramattaḥ kurute vikarma: their only business is to indulge in all kinds of forbidden activities for sense gratification. Yad indriya-prītaya āpṛṇoti: they deviate in this way because they want to gratify their senses. They have no other occupation or ambition. Their method of civilization is condemned in the previous verse. Kaḥ kṣemo nija-parayoḥ kiyān vārthaḥ sva-para-druhā dharmeṇa: “What is the meaning of a civilization that kills oneself and others?”

This verse, therefore, advises that everyone become a member of the Āryan civilization and accept the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. One should conduct his social, political and religious affairs according to His instructions. We are spreading the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement to try to establish a society the way that Kṛṣṇa wants it. This is the meaning of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. We are therefore presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is and kicking out all kinds of mental concoction. Fools and rascals interpret Bhagavad-gītā in their own way. When Kṛṣṇa says, man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru — “Always think of Me, become My devotee, worship Me and offer your homage unto Me” — they comment that it is not Kṛṣṇa to whom we must surrender. Thus they derive imaginary meanings from Bhagavad-gītā. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, however, strictly follows bhāgavata-dharma, the instructions of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for the complete welfare of human society. One who misinterprets Bhagavad-gītā, twisting out some meaning for his sense gratification, is a non-Āryan. Therefore commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā by such persons should be immediately rejected. One should try to follow Bhagavad-gītā as it is. In Bhagavad-gītā (12.6-7) Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa says:

ye tu sarvāṇi karmāṇi mayi sannyasya mat-parāḥ ananyenaiva yogena māṁ dhyāyanta upāsate

teṣām ahaṁ samuddhartā mṛtyu-saṁsāra-sāgarāt bhavāmi na cirāt pārtha mayy āveśita-cetasām

“For one who worships Me, giving up all his activities unto Me and being devoted to Me without deviation, engaged in devotional service and always meditating upon Me, who has fixed his mind upon Me, O son of Pṛthā, for him I am the swift deliverer from the ocean of birth and death.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Your judgment by which bhakti is defined does not waiver. Cultured people who see all beings equally practice this dharma. “People follow kāmya-dharma even though it is temporary and full of faults because they see results. They have doubt to follow niṣkāma-dharma, though it is faultless, because they do not see results.” Your judgment (īkṣā), that the jīva becomes successful by bhakti to you, does not waiver. In kāmya-dharma, the results sometimes are unsteady. But in bhakti under your supervision, the results are not unsteady. Therefore cultured people perform bhakti. Let the uncultured people have their doubts. Such cultured persons have intelligence which does not see happiness and distress in oneself and others as different (apṛthag-dhiyaḥ). The meter of this verse is also called ārya.
Related verses
Occupational duty as taught in the Bhāgavatam and Gītā, done under Your supervision, never deviates from the highest goal. Aligned duty is itself the path.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I aligned my occupation with His point of view?
  • Where would alignment require a small change immediately?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.44

↗
न हि भगवन्नघटितमिदं त्वद्दर्शनान्नृणामखिलपापक्षय: । यन्नाम सकृच्छ्रवणात् पुक्कशोऽपि विमुच्यते संसारात् ॥ ४४ ॥
na hi bhagavann aghaṭitam idaṁ
[na hi bhagavann aghatitam idam]
tvad-darśanān nṛṇām akhila-pāpa-kṣayaḥ
[tvad-darshanaan nrinaam akhila-paapa-kshayah]
yan-nāma sakṛc chravaṇāt
[yan-naama sakrich chravanaat]
pukkaśo ’pi vimucyate saṁsārāt
[pukkasho ’pi vimuchyate samsaaraat]
na — not hi — indeed bhagavan — O my Lord aghaṭitam — not occurred idam — this tvat — of You darśanāt — by seeing nṛṇām — of all human beings akhila — all pāpa — of sins kṣayaḥ — annihilation yat-nāma — whose name sakṛt — only once śravaṇāt — by hearing pukkaśaḥ — the lowest class, the caṇḍāla api — also vimucyate — is delivered saṁsārāt — from the entanglement of material existence.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na hi bhagavann aghaṭitam idaṁ
na
not
hi
indeed
bhagavan
O my Lord
aghaṭitam
not occurred
idam
this
tvad-darśanān nṛṇām akhila-pāpa-kṣayaḥ
tvat
of You
darśanāt
by seeing
nṛṇām
of all human beings
akhila
all
pāpa
of sins
kṣayaḥ
annihilation
yan-nāma sakṛc chravaṇāt
yat-nāma
whose name
sakṛt
only once
śravaṇāt
by hearing
pukkaśo ’pi vimucyate saṁsārāt
pukkaśaḥ
the lowest class, the caṇḍāla
api
also
vimucyate
is delivered
saṁsārāt
from the entanglement of material existence.
My Lord, it is not impossible for one to be immediately freed from all material contamination by seeing You. Not to speak of seeing You personally, merely by hearing the holy name of Your Lordship only once, even caṇḍālas, men of the lowest class, are freed from all material contamination. Under the circumstances, who will not be freed from material contamination simply by seeing You?

As stated in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (9.5.16) , yan-nāma-śruti-mātreṇa pumān bhavati nirmalaḥ: simply by hearing the holy name of the Lord, one is immediately purified. Therefore, in this Age of Kali, when all people are very contaminated, the chanting of the holy name of the Lord is recommended as the only means of improvement.

harer nāma harer nāma harer nāmaiva kevalam kalau nāsty eva nāsty eva nāsty eva gatir anyathā

“In this age of quarrel and hypocrisy the only means of deliverance is the chanting of the holy name of the Lord. There is no other way. There is no other way. There is no other way.” ( Bṛhan-nāradīya Purāṇa ) Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu introduced this chanting of the holy name five hundred years ago, and now through the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement, we are actually seeing that men who are considered to belong to the lowest class are being delivered from all sinful activities simply by hearing the holy name of the Lord. Saṁsāra, material existence, is a result of sinful actions. Everyone in this material world is condemned, yet as there are different grades of prisoners, there are different grades of men. All of them, in all statuses of life, are suffering. To stop the suffering of material existence, one must take to the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement of saṅkīrtana or Kṛṣṇa conscious life.

Herein it is said, yan-nāma sakṛc chravaṇāt: the holy name of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is so powerful that if once heard without offenses, it can purify the lowest of men ( kirāta-hūṇāndhra-pulinda-pulkaśāḥ ). Such men, who are called caṇḍālas, are less than śūdras, but they also can be purified simply by hearing the holy name of the Lord, not to speak of personally seeing the Lord. From our present position, the Supreme Personality of Godhead can be personally seen as the Deity in the temple. The Deity of the Lord is not different from the Supreme Lord. Because we cannot see the Supreme Lord with our present blunt eyes, the Lord has kindly consented to come before us in a form we can see. Therefore the Deity in the temple should not be considered material. By offering food to the Deity and by decorating and serving the Deity, one gets the same result that one derives from serving the Lord personally in Vaikuṇṭha.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! Nothing is impossible for you. Just from seeing you, all my sins have been destroyed. By hearing one of your names once, even the outcaste is delivered from the material world. I have obtained direct results of this pure bhakti. Nṛnām (men) here means Citraketu. What to speak of destruction of sins, it gives liberation. Just one name is sufficient to do this. What then will happen by many names? And just one time hearing is sufficient. What happens when one hears many times? Just by hearing the name this happens. What then will happen if one chants the name? This happens for outcastes. What then will happen for others? It delivers one from the material world. Then what to speak of destroying all sins! And one sees the results during practice (sādhana).
Freedom from contamination is not impossible by seeing You — even hearing Your name once liberates the lowest. The threshold for liberation is astonishingly low.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I lower the threshold of liberation in my mind, or treat it as impossibly high?
  • What act today would honor the actual low threshold?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.45

↗
अथ भगवन् वयमधुना त्वदवलोकपरिमृष्टाशयमला: । सुरऋषिणा यत्कथितं तावकेन कथमन्यथा भवति ॥ ४५ ॥
atha bhagavan vayam adhunā
[atha bhagavan vayam adhunaa]
tvad-avaloka-parimṛṣṭāśaya-malāḥ
[tvad-avaloka-parimrishtaashaya-malaah]
sura-ṛṣiṇā yat kathitaṁ
[sura-rishinaa yat kathitam]
tāvakena katham anyathā bhavati
[taavakena katham anyathaa bhavati]
atha — therefore bhagavan — O Supreme Personality of Godhead vayam — we adhunā — at the present moment tvat-avaloka — by seeing You parimṛṣṭa — wiped away āśaya-malāḥ — contaminated desires in the heart sura-ṛṣiṇā — by the great sage of the demigods (Nārada) yat — which kathitam — spoken tāvakena — who is Your devotee katham — how anyathā — otherwise bhavati — can it be.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha bhagavan vayam adhunā
atha
therefore
bhagavan
O Supreme Personality of Godhead
vayam
we
adhunā
at the present moment
tvad-avaloka-parimṛṣṭāśaya-malāḥ
tvat-avaloka
by seeing You
parimṛṣṭa
wiped away
āśaya-malāḥ
contaminated desires in the heart
sura-ṛṣiṇā yat kathitaṁ
sura-ṛṣiṇā
by the great sage of the demigods (Nārada)
yat
which
kathitam
spoken
tāvakena katham anyathā bhavati
tāvakena
who is Your devotee
katham
how
anyathā
otherwise
bhavati
can it be.
Therefore, my dear Lord, simply seeing You has now wiped away all the contamination of sinful activities and their results of material attachment and lusty desires, which always filled my mind and the core of my heart. Whatever is predicted by the great sage Nārada Muni cannot be otherwise. In other words, I have obtained Your audience as a result of being trained by Nārada Muni.

This is the process of the perfect way. One must take lessons from authorities like Nārada, Vyāsa and Asita, and follow their principles. Then one will be able to see the Supreme Personality of Godhead even with one’s own eyes. One only needs training. Ataḥ śrī-kṛṣṇa-nāmādi na bhaved grāhyam indriyaiḥ. With our blunt eyes and other senses we cannot perceive the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but if we engage our senses in the service of the Lord according to the instructions of the authorities, it will be possible to see Him. As soon as one sees the Supreme Personality of Godhead, all the sinful reactions in the core of one’s heart are certainly vanquished.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! My heart has now been completely purified by your glance. How can what Nārada told me not come true? I have become successful. That is expressed in this verse.
Simply seeing You has wiped out my mind's contamination — whatever the sages predicted has come true. The seer testifies to his own prediction-fulfillment.
Reflection Questions
  • What seer's prediction in my life has come true, and have I noted it?
  • Could naming the fulfillment increase faith for the next one?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.46

↗
विदितमनन्त समस्तं तव जगदात्मनो जनैरिहाचरितम् । विज्ञाप्यं परमगुरो: कियदिव सवितुरिव खद्योतै: ॥ ४६ ॥
viditam ananta samastaṁ
[viditam ananta samastam]
tava jagad-ātmano janair ihācaritam
[tava jagad-aatmano janair ihaacharitam]
vijñāpyaṁ parama-guroḥ
[vijnaapyam parama-guroh]
kiyad iva savitur iva khadyotaiḥ
[kiyad iva savitur iva khadyotaih]
viditam — well known ananta — O unlimited samastam — everything tava — to You jagat-ātmanaḥ — who are the Supersoul of all living entities janaiḥ — by the mass of people, or all living entities iha — within this material world ācaritam — performed vijñāpyam — to be informed parama-guroḥ — to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the supreme master kiyat — how much iva — certainly savituḥ — to the sun iva — like khadyotaiḥ — by the fireflies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viditam ananta samastaṁ
viditam
well known
ananta
O unlimited
samastam
everything
tava jagad-ātmano janair ihācaritam
tava
to You
jagat-ātmanaḥ
who are the Supersoul of all living entities
janaiḥ
by the mass of people, or all living entities
iha
within this material world
ācaritam
performed
vijñāpyaṁ parama-guroḥ
vijñāpyam
to be informed
parama-guroḥ
to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the supreme master
kiyad iva savitur iva khadyotaiḥ
kiyat
how much
iva
certainly
savituḥ
to the sun
iva
like
khadyotaiḥ
by the fireflies.
O unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead, whatever a living entity does in this material world is well known to You because You are the Supersoul. In the presence of the sun there is nothing to be revealed by the light of a glowworm. Similarly, because You know everything, in Your presence there is nothing for me to make known.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O unlimited Lord! Everything done by the people in this world is known to you, the soul of the universe, the supreme guru. How much do we know in comparison to you? Our knowledge, in comparison of yours, is like a firefly’s light compared to the sun’s. Though I was blind with material enjoyment, inspired by your devotee, I was delivered from the well of saṁsāra and brought to your lotus feet. What else can I reveal? Everything is known to you. What can be revealed by a firefly in front of the sun? And what can be revealed by me in front of you?
You know everything because You are the Supersoul — like the sun, You leave nothing for a glowworm to add. Our 'informing' of God is comic.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I treated prayer as informing rather than as relating?
  • What would honest relating sound like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.47

↗
नमस्तुभ्यं भगवते सकलजगत्स्थितिलयोदयेशाय । दुरवसितात्मगतये कुयोगिनां भिदा परमहंसाय ॥ ४७ ॥
namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
[namas tubhyam bhagavate]
sakala-jagat-sthiti-layodayeśāya
[sakala-jagat-sthiti-layodayeshaaya]
duravasitātma-gataye
[duravasitaatma-gataye]
kuyogināṁ bhidā paramahaṁsāya
[kuyoginaam bhidaa paramahamsaaya]
namaḥ — all obeisances tubhyam — unto You bhagavate — Your Lordship sakala — all jagat — of the cosmic manifestation sthiti — of the maintenance laya — dissolution udaya — and creation īśāya — unto the Supreme Lord duravasita — impossible to understand ātma-gataye — whose own position ku-yoginām — of those who are attached to the objects of the senses bhidā — by the false understanding of separateness parama-haṁsāya — unto the supreme pure.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
namas tubhyaṁ bhagavate
namaḥ
all obeisances
tubhyam
unto You
bhagavate
Your Lordship
sakala-jagat-sthiti-layodayeśāya
sakala
all
jagat
of the cosmic manifestation
sthiti
of the maintenance
laya
dissolution
udaya
and creation
īśāya
unto the Supreme Lord
duravasitātma-gataye
duravasita
impossible to understand
ātma-gataye
whose own position
kuyogināṁ bhidā paramahaṁsāya
ku-yoginām
of those who are attached to the objects of the senses
bhidā
by the false understanding of separateness
parama-haṁsāya
unto the supreme pure.
My dear Lord, You are the creator, maintainer and annihilator of this cosmic manifestation, but persons who are too materialistic and who always see separateness do not have eyes with which to see You. They cannot understand Your real position, and therefore they conclude that the cosmic manifestation is independent of Your opulence. My Lord, You are the supreme pure, and You are full in all six opulences. Therefore I offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

Atheistic men think that the cosmic manifestation has come about by chance, by a combination of matter, without reference to God. Materialistic so-called chemists and atheistic philosophers always try to avoid even the name of God in relation to the cosmic manifestation. For them God’s creation is impossible to understand because they are too materialistic. The Supreme Personality of Godhead is paramahaṁsa, or the supreme pure, whereas those who are sinful, being very much attached to material sense enjoyment and therefore engaging in material activities like asses, are the lowest of men. All their so-called scientific knowledge is null and void because of their atheistic temperament. Thus they cannot understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to you, the Supreme Lord, the master of creation, maintenance and destruction of all universes, the supreme swan, whose position is hard to understand for false yogīs who see with difference. Your position is hard to understand by the false yogīs who see with difference (bhidā). In the form of the great swan you deliver the jīvas.
You are the creator, maintainer, annihilator, but materialists who see separateness can't see You — their concept of demigods is offensive. Polytheism without unity beneath misses You.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do my multiple worships fail to converge in You?
  • What would convergence look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.48

↗
यं वै श्वसन्तमनु विश्वसृज: श्वसन्ति यं चेकितानमनु चित्तय उच्चकन्ति । भूमण्डलं सर्षपायति यस्य मूर्ध्नि तस्मै नमो भगवतेऽस्तु सहस्रमूर्ध्ने ॥ ४८ ॥
yaṁ vai śvasantam anu viśva-sṛjaḥ śvasanti
[yam vai shvasantam anu vishva-srijah shvasanti]
yaṁ cekitānam anu cittaya uccakanti
[yam chekitaanam anu chittaya uchchakanti]
bhū-maṇḍalaṁ sarṣapāyati yasya mūrdhni
[bhoo-mandalam sarshapaayati yasya moordhni]
tasmai namo bhagavate ’stu sahasra-mūrdhne
[tasmai namo bhagavate ’stu sahasra-moordhne]
yam — whom vai — indeed śvasantam — endeavoring anu — after viśva-sṛjaḥ — the directors of the cosmic creation śvasanti — also endeavor yam — whom cekitānam — perceiving anu — after cittayaḥ — all the knowledge-gathering senses uccakanti — perceive bhū-maṇḍalam — the huge universe sarṣapāyati — become like seeds of mustard yasya — of whom mūrdhni — on the head tasmai — unto Him namaḥ — obeisances bhagavate — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, full with six opulences astu — may there be sahasra-mūrdhne — who has thousands of hoods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaṁ vai śvasantam anu viśva-sṛjaḥ śvasanti
yam
whom
vai
indeed
śvasantam
endeavoring
anu
after
viśva-sṛjaḥ
the directors of the cosmic creation
śvasanti
also endeavor
yaṁ cekitānam anu cittaya uccakanti
yam
whom
cekitānam
perceiving
anu
after
cittayaḥ
all the knowledge-gathering senses
uccakanti
perceive
bhū-maṇḍalaṁ sarṣapāyati yasya mūrdhni
bhū-maṇḍalam
the huge universe
sarṣapāyati
become like seeds of mustard
yasya
of whom
mūrdhni
on the head
tasmai namo bhagavate ’stu sahasra-mūrdhne
tasmai
unto Him
namaḥ
obeisances
bhagavate
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, full with six opulences
astu
may there be
sahasra-mūrdhne
who has thousands of hoods.
My dear Lord, it is after You endeavor that Lord Brahmā, Indra and the other directors of the cosmic manifestation become occupied with their activities. It is after You perceive the material energy, My Lord, that the senses begin to perceive. The Supreme Personality of Godhead holds all the universes on His heads like seeds of mustard. I offer my respectful obeisances unto You, that Supreme Personality, who has thousands of hoods.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
May I offer respects to the Supreme Lord with a thousand hoods, after whose actions the creators of the universe can use their action senses, after whose perception, the knowledge senses can gather knowledge, and on whose head Bhū-maṇḍala rests like a mustard seed! Śvasantam means actions. After the Lord’s actions, the devatās can use their action senses (śvasanti). After the Lord sees, the knowledge senses can perceive their sense objects.
Brahmā, Indra and others act only after Your endeavor; senses perceive only after You perceive material energy. We are downstream of His attention.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I act as if I am upstream of Him?
  • What humbling does the metaphysics rightly produce?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.49

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच संस्तुतो भगवानेवमनन्तस्तमभाषत । विद्याधरपतिं प्रीतश्चित्रकेतुं कुरूद्वह ॥ ४९ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
saṁstuto bhagavān evam
[samstuto bhagavaan evam]
anantas tam abhāṣata
[anantas tam abhaashata]
vidyādhara-patiṁ prītaś
[vidyaadhara-patim preetash]
citraketuṁ kurūdvaha
[chitraketum kuroodvaha]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said saṁstutaḥ — being worshiped bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead evam — in this way anantaḥ — Lord Ananta tam — unto him abhāṣata — replied vidyādhara-patim — the King of the Vidyādharas prītaḥ — being very pleased citraketum — King Citraketu kuru-udvaha — O best of the Kuru dynasty, Mahārāja Parīkṣit.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
saṁstuto bhagavān evam
saṁstutaḥ
being worshiped
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
evam
in this way
anantas tam abhāṣata
anantaḥ
Lord Ananta
tam
unto him
abhāṣata
replied
vidyādhara-patiṁ prītaś
vidyādhara-patim
the King of the Vidyādharas
prītaḥ
being very pleased
citraketuṁ kurūdvaha
citraketum
King Citraketu
kuru-udvaha
O best of the Kuru dynasty, Mahārāja Parīkṣit.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: The Lord, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Anantadeva, being very much pleased with the prayers offered by Citraketu, the King of the Vidyādharas, replied to him as follows, O best of the Kuru dynasty, Mahārāja Parīkṣit.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: O Mahārāja Parīkṣit! The Supreme Lord, Anantadeva, pleased with the prayers offered by Citraketu, the King of the Vidyādharas, replied to him as follows.
Pleased by Citraketu's prayers, Anantadeva replied. The chain — practice, mantra, vision, prayer, reply — completes itself.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I completed the chain in my own practice, or stopped before reply?
  • What step of mine is missing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.50

↗
श्रीभगवानुवाच यन्नारदाङ्गिरोभ्यां ते व्याहृतं मेऽनुशासनम् । संसिद्धोऽसि तया राजन् विद्यया दर्शनाच्च मे ॥ ५० ॥
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
[shree-bhagavaan uvaacha]
yan nāradāṅgirobhyāṁ te
[yan naaradaangirobhyaam te]
vyāhṛtaṁ me ’nuśāsanam
[vyaahritam me ’nushaasanam]
saṁsiddho ’si tayā rājan
[samsiddho ’si tayaa raajan]
vidyayā darśanāc ca me
[vidyayaa darshanaach cha me]
śrī-bhagavān uvāca — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Saṅkarṣaṇa, replied yat — which nārada-aṅgirobhyām — by the great sages Nārada and Aṅgirā te — unto you vyāhṛtam — spoken me — of Me anuśāsanam — the worship saṁsiddhaḥ — completely perfected asi — you are tayā — by that rājan — O King vidyayā — mantra darśanāt — from the direct sight ca — as well as me — of Me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Saṅkarṣaṇa, replied
yan nāradāṅgirobhyāṁ te
yat
which
nārada-aṅgirobhyām
by the great sages Nārada and Aṅgirā
te
unto you
vyāhṛtaṁ me ’nuśāsanam
vyāhṛtam
spoken
me
of Me
anuśāsanam
the worship
saṁsiddho ’si tayā rājan
saṁsiddhaḥ
completely perfected
asi
you are
tayā
by that
rājan
O King
vidyayā darśanāc ca me
vidyayā
mantra
darśanāt
from the direct sight
ca
as well as
me
of Me.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Anantadeva, replied as follows: O King, as a result of your having accepted the instructions spoken about Me by the great sages Nārada and Aṅgirā, you have become completely aware of transcendental knowledge. Because you are now educated in the spiritual science, you have seen Me face to face. Therefore you are now completely perfect.

The perfection of life is to be spiritually educated and to understand the existence of the Lord and how He creates, maintains and annihilates the cosmic manifestation. When one is perfect in knowledge, he can develop his love of Godhead through the association of such perfect persons as Nārada and Aṅgirā and the members of their disciplic succession. Then one is able to see the unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead face to face. Although the Lord is unlimited, by His causeless mercy He becomes visible to the devotee, who is then able to see Him. In our present position of conditioned life we cannot see or understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

ataḥ śrī-kṛṣṇa-nāmādi na bhaved grāhyam indriyaiḥ sevonmukhe hi jihvādau svayam eva sphuraty adaḥ

“No one can understand the transcendental nature of the name, form, quality and pastimes of Śrī Kṛṣṇa through his materially contaminated senses. Only when one becomes spiritually saturated by transcendental service to the Lord are the transcendental name, form, quality and pastimes of the Lord revealed to him.” ( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.2.234) If one takes to spiritual life under the direction of Nārada Muni or his representative and thus engages himself in the service of the Lord, he qualifies himself to see the Lord face to face. The Brahma-saṁhitā (5.38) states:

premāñjana-cchurita-bhakti-vilocanena santaḥ sadaiva hṛdayeṣu vilokayanti yaṁ śyāmasundaram acintya-guṇa-svarūpaṁ govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi

“I worship the primeval Lord, Govinda, who is always seen by the devotee whose eyes are anointed with the pulp of love. He is seen in His eternal form of Śyāmasundara situated within the heart of the devotee.” One must follow the instructions of the spiritual master. Thus one becomes qualified and later sees the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as evinced by Mahārāja Citraketu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord said: By the mantra, by knowledge of my worship explained by Nārada and Aṅgirā and by seeing me, you have become perfect. By the knowledge of my worship in the form of hearing and chanting, and by the great mantra taught by Nārada, and by the result of that, seeing me, you have achieved perfection.
By accepting the instructions of Nārada and Aṅgirā, you have become aware of transcendental knowledge. Reception of authentic instruction is itself the awareness.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I received an authentic instruction and not yet acted as if it counted?
  • What changes when I treat acceptance as already a victory?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.51

↗
अहं वै सर्वभूतानि भूतात्मा भूतभावन: । शब्दब्रह्म परं ब्रह्म ममोभे शाश्वती तनू ॥ ५१ ॥
ahaṁ vai sarva-bhūtāni
[aham vai sarva-bhootaani]
bhūtātmā bhūta-bhāvanaḥ
[bhootaatmaa bhoota-bhaavanah]
śabda-brahma paraṁ brahma
[shabda-brahma param brahma]
mamobhe śāśvatī tanū
[mamobhe shaashvatee tanoo]
aham — I vai — indeed sarva-bhūtāni — expanded in different forms of living entities bhūta-ātmā — the Supersoul of all living entities (the supreme director and enjoyer of them) bhūta-bhāvanaḥ — the cause for the manifestation of all living entities śabda-brahma — the transcendental sound vibration (the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra) param brahma — the Supreme Absolute Truth mama — My ubhe — both (namely, the form of sound and the form of spiritual identity) śāśvatī — eternal tanū — two bodies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ahaṁ vai sarva-bhūtāni
aham
I
vai
indeed
sarva-bhūtāni
expanded in different forms of living entities
bhūta-ātmā
the Supersoul of all living entities (the supreme director and enjoyer of them)
bhūtātmā bhūta-bhāvanaḥ
bhūta-bhāvanaḥ
the cause for the manifestation of all living entities
śabda-brahma paraṁ brahma
śabda-brahma
the transcendental sound vibration (the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra)
param brahma
the Supreme Absolute Truth
mama
My
ubhe
both (namely, the form of sound and the form of spiritual identity)
mamobhe śāśvatī tanū
śāśvatī
eternal
tanū
two bodies.
All living entities, moving and nonmoving, are My expansions and are separate from Me. I am the Supersoul of all living beings, who exist because I manifest them. I am the form of the transcendental vibrations like oṁkāra and Hare Kṛṣṇa Hare Rāma, and I am the Supreme Absolute Truth. These two forms of Mine — namely, the transcendental sound and the eternally blissful spiritual form of the Deity, are My eternal forms; they are not material.

The science of devotional service has been instructed by Nārada and Aṅgirā to Citraketu. Now, because of Citraketu’s devotional service, he has seen the Supreme Personality of Godhead. By performing devotional service, one advances step by step, and when one is on the platform of love of Godhead ( premā pumartho mahān ) he sees the Supreme Lord at every moment. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, when one engages in devotional service twenty-four hours a day ( teṣāṁ satata-yuktānāṁ bhajatāṁ prīti-pūrvakam ) in accordance with the instructions of the spiritual master, his devotional service becomes more and more pleasing. Then the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is within the core of everyone’s heart, speaks to the devotee ( dadāmi buddhi-yogaṁ taṁ yena mām upayānti te ). Citraketu Mahārāja was first instructed by his gurus, Aṅgirā and Nārada, and now, having followed their instructions, he has come to the stage of seeing the Supreme Lord face to face. Therefore the Lord is now instructing him in the essence of knowledge.

The essence of knowledge is that there are two kinds of vastu, or substances. One is real, and the other, being illusory or temporary, is sometimes called nonfactual. One must consider these two kinds of existence. The real tattva, or truth, consists of Brahman, Paramātmā, and Bhagavān. As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.11) :

vadanti tat tattva-vidas tattvaṁ yaj jñānam advayam brahmeti paramātmeti bhagavān iti śabdyate

“Learned transcendentalists who know the Absolute Truth call this nondual substance Brahman, Paramātmā or Bhagavān.” The Absolute Truth exists eternally in three features. Therefore, Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān combined are the substance.

The categories of emanations from the nonsubstance are two — activities and forbidden activities ( karma and vikarma ). Karma refers to the pious life or material activities performed during the day and the mental activities of dreams at night. These are more or less desired activities. Vikarma, however, refers to illusory activities, which are something like the will-o’-the-wisp. These are activities that have no meaning. For example, modern scientists imagine that life can be produced from chemical combinations, and they are very busy trying to prove this in laboratories throughout the world, although no one in history has been able to produce the substance of life from material combinations. Such activities are called vikarma.

All material activities are actually illusory, and progress in illusion is simply a waste of time. These illusory activities are called akārya, and one must learn of them from the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (4.17) :

karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ boddhavyaṁ ca vikarmaṇaḥ akarmaṇaś ca boddhavyaṁ gahanā karmaṇo gatiḥ

“The intricacies of action are very hard to understand. Therefore one should know properly what action is, what forbidden action is, and what inaction is.” One must learn of these directly from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who, as Anantadeva, is instructing King Citraketu because of the advanced stage of devotional service he achieved by following the instructions of Nārada and Aṅgirā.

Herein it is said, ahaṁ vai sarva-bhūtāni: the Lord is everything ( sarva-bhūtāni ), including the living entities and the material or physical elements. As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (7.4-5):

bhūmir āpo ’nalo vāyuḥ khaṁ mano buddhir eva ca ahaṅkāra itīyaṁ me bhinnā prakṛtir aṣṭadhā

apareyam itas tv anyāṁ prakṛtiṁ viddhi me parām jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat

“Earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego — all together these eight comprise My separated material energies. Besides this inferior nature, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is a superior energy of Mine, which consists of the living entities, who are struggling with material nature and are sustaining the universe.” The living entity tries to lord it over the material or physical elements, but both the physical elements and the spiritual spark are energies emanating from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Lord says, ahaṁ vai sarva-bhūtāni: “I am everything.” Just as heat and light emanate from fire, these two energies — the physical elements and the living entities — emanate from the Supreme Lord. Therefore the Lord says, ahaṁ vai sarva-bhūtāni: “I expand the physical and spiritual categories.”

Again, the Lord, as the Supersoul, guides the living entities who are conditioned by the physical atmosphere. Therefore he is called bhūtātmā bhūta-bhāvanaḥ. He gives the living entity the intelligence with which to improve his position so that he may return home, back to Godhead, or if he does not want to go back to Godhead, the Lord gives him the intelligence with which to improve his material position. This is confirmed by the Lord Himself in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) . Sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “I am seated in everyone’s heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness.” From within, the Lord gives the living being the intelligence with which to work. Therefore the previous verse said that after the Supreme Personality of Godhead endeavors, our endeavors begin. We cannot independently endeavor or act upon anything. Therefore the Lord is bhūta-bhāvanaḥ.

Another specific feature of the knowledge given in this verse is that śabda-brahma is also a form of the Supreme Lord. In His eternal, blissful form, Lord Kṛṣṇa is accepted by Arjuna as paraṁ brahma. A living entity in the conditioned stage accepts something illusory as substantial. This is called māyā or avidyā — ignorance. Therefore according to the Vedic knowledge, one must become a devotee, and one must then distinguish between avidyā and vidyā, which are elaborately explained in the Īśopaniṣad. When one is actually on the platform of vidyā, he can personally understand the Personality of Godhead in His forms like those of Lord Rāma, Lord Kṛṣṇa and Saṅkarṣaṇa. The Vedic knowledge is described as the breathing of the Supreme Lord, and activities begin on the basis of Vedic knowledge. Therefore the Lord says that when He endeavors or breathes, the material universes come into existence, and various activities gradually develop. The Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā, praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu: “I am the syllable om in all the Vedic mantras. ” Vedic knowledge begins with the vibration of the transcendental sound praṇava, oṁkāra. The same transcendental sound is Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. Abhinnatvān nāma-nāminoḥ: there is no difference between the holy name of the Lord and the Lord Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I am all beings. I am the soul of all beings. I am the cause of all beings. The scripture and impersonal Brahman are my two eternal forms. You have understood about bhakti. Your verses of praise are the proof. I will now teach about jñāna, in order that you become indifferent to questioning. Please listen. You should consider this. There are two types of objects, permanent and temporary. There are three eternal objects: Brahman, Paramātmā, and Bhagavān with his associates. The insentient universe made of matter is the temporary object. There are two types of unreal objects: experienced and unexperienced. The experienced unreal objects consist of dreams and magic. The unexperienced unreal objects consist of imaginary objects like a flower in the sky or a rabbit with horns. The First Canto of Bhāgavatam says that the permanent object is the best: vedyam vāstavam atra vastu. (SB 1.1.2) In order to speak about the permanent object, first the impermanent objects are described. I am all beings. I am the universes consisting of the jīvas and their enjoyed objects, since I am non-different from my māyā-śakti and my jīva-śakti. The jīvas are called temporary objects in this case because of their covering of ignorance. That permanent object is then explained. I am the second and third puruṣas: the antaryāmī of all the jīvas in a universe, and the antaryāmī of the individual jīva. And I manifest all these beings (bhūta-bhāvanaḥ): I am the first puruṣa. And I bestow these jīvas with various bhāvas such as dāsya or sakhya (bhūta-bhāvanaḥ). I am the Vedas (śabda-brahma), which are my breathing. I am the impersonal Brahman realized by jñānīs. These two are my forms. There may be a fear that the Vedas are not eternal since they are a form of sound related to ether, which is material. There may a fear that parabrahma is unreal since it is not definable by words. To remove those doubts it is said: these two are eternally existing.
All beings are My expansions and separate from Me; I am the Supersoul of all, the form of oṁkāra and Hare Kṛṣṇa Hare Rāma. The Lord identifies Himself with mantric vibration.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I treat the mantra as a sound about the Lord or as a form of the Lord?
  • How would the second view reshape my chanting?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.52

↗
लोके विततमात्मानं लोकं चात्मनि सन्ततम् । उभयं च मया व्याप्तं मयि चैवोभयं कृतम् ॥ ५२ ॥
loke vitatam ātmānaṁ
[loke vitatam aatmaanam]
lokaṁ cātmani santatam
[lokam chaatmani santatam]
ubhayaṁ ca mayā vyāptaṁ
[ubhayam cha mayaa vyaaptam]
mayi caivobhayaṁ kṛtam
[mayi chaivobhayam kritam]
loke — in this material world vitatam — expanded (in the spirit of material enjoyment) ātmānam — the living entity lokam — the material world ca — also ātmani — in the living entity santatam — spread ubhayam — both (the material world of material elements and the living entity) ca — and mayā — by Me vyāptam — pervaded mayi — in Me ca — also eva — indeed ubhayam — both of them kṛtam — created.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
loke vitatam ātmānaṁ
loke
in this material world
vitatam
expanded (in the spirit of material enjoyment)
ātmānam
the living entity
lokaṁ cātmani santatam
lokam
the material world
ca
also
ātmani
in the living entity
santatam
spread
ubhayaṁ ca mayā vyāptaṁ
ubhayam
both (the material world of material elements and the living entity)
ca
and
mayā
by Me
vyāptam
pervaded
mayi caivobhayaṁ kṛtam
mayi
in Me
ca
also
eva
indeed
ubhayam
both of them
kṛtam
created.
In this world of matter, which the conditioned soul accepts as consisting of enjoyable resources, the conditioned soul expands, thinking that he is the enjoyer of the material world. Similarly, the material world expands in the living entity as a source of enjoyment. In this way they both expand, but because they are My energies, they are both pervaded by Me. As the Supreme Lord, I am the cause of these effects, and one should know that both of them rest in Me.

The Māyāvāda philosophy sees everything as being equal in quality with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or the Supreme Brahman, and therefore sees everything as worshipable. This dangerous theory of the Māyāvāda school has turned people in general toward atheism. On the strength of this theory, one thinks that he is God, but this is not a fact. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā ( mayā tatam idaṁ sarvaṁ jagad avyakta-mūrtinā ), the fact is that the entire cosmic manifestation is an expansion of the Supreme Lord’s energies, which are manifested in the physical elements and the living entities. The living entities wrongly consider the physical elements to be resources meant for their enjoyment, and they think themselves to be the enjoyers. However, neither of them is independent; they are both energies of the Lord. The original cause for the material energy and spiritual energy is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. However, although the expansion of the Lord’s energies is the original cause, one should not think that the Lord Himself has expanded in different ways. To condemn the theories of the Māyāvādīs, the Lord clearly says in Bhagavad-gītā, mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni na cāhaṁ teṣv avasthitaḥ: “All beings are in Me, but I am not in them.” Everything rests upon Him, and everything is but an expansion of His energies, but this does not mean that everything is as worshipable as the Lord Himself. The material expansion is temporary, but the Lord is not temporary. The living entities are parts of the Lord, but they are not the Lord Himself. The living entities in this material world are not inconceivable, but the Lord is. The theory that the Lord’s energies, being expansions of the Lord, are as good as the Lord is mistaken.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva takes the position of an enjoyer in this world and the world is situated as the object of enjoyment for the jīva. Both are pervaded by me, since I am their cause, and both are produced within me. “If you are everything, then the devotees should meditate on all living entities as the object of worship and they would be the antaryāmī.” In the material world, the jīva has the status of the enjoyer (vitatam). The world is situated as the object of enjoyment for the jīva (ātmani). Both the jīva and the world are pervaded by me, the cause. Both exist as products in me, the adhiṣṭhāna-kāraṇa (cause by being the support). The verb of the sentence smaret is in verse 54. All beings, are products of my śaktis, are temporary and do not arise from my svarūpa. Therefore they should not be the object of meditation in worship.
The conditioned soul accepts material world as enjoyable and expands within it as 'enjoyer'; the world simultaneously expands in him. Subject and object co-construct their bondage.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I co-constructing a bondage by treating something as enjoyable?
  • What would withdrawal of the 'enjoyer' label do to that bondage?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.53-54

↗
यथा सुषुप्त: पुरुषो विश्वं पश्यति चात्मनि । आत्मानमेकदेशस्थं मन्यते स्वप्न उत्थित: ॥ ५३ ॥ एवं जागरणादीनि जीवस्थानानि चात्मन: । मायामात्राणि विज्ञाय तद् द्रष्टारं परं स्मरेत् ॥ ५४ ॥
yathā suṣuptaḥ puruṣo
[yathaa sushuptah purusho]
viśvaṁ paśyati cātmani
[vishvam pashyati chaatmani]
ātmānam eka-deśa-sthaṁ
[aatmaanam eka-desha-stham]
manyate svapna utthitaḥ
[manyate svapna utthitah]
evaṁ jāgaraṇādīni
[evam jaagaranaadeeni]
jīva-sthānāni cātmanaḥ
[jeeva-sthaanaani chaatmanah]
māyā-mātrāṇi vijñāya
[maayaa-maatraani vijnaaya]
tad-draṣṭāraṁ paraṁ smaret
[tad-drashtaaram param smaret]
yathā — just as suṣuptaḥ — sleeping puruṣaḥ — a person viśvam — the whole universe paśyati — perceives ca — also ātmani — in himself ātmānam — himself eka-deśa-stham — lying down in one place manyate — he considers svapne — in the dreaming condition utthitaḥ — waking up evam — in this way jāgaraṇa-ādīni — the states of wakefulness and so on jīva-sthānāni — the living entity’s different conditions of existence ca — also ātmanaḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead māyā-mātrāṇi — the exhibitions of the illusory potency vijñāya — knowing tat — of them draṣṭāram — the creator or seer of all such conditions param — the Supreme smaret — one should always remember.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā suṣuptaḥ puruṣo
yathā
just as
suṣuptaḥ
sleeping
puruṣaḥ
a person
viśvaṁ paśyati cātmani
viśvam
the whole universe
paśyati
perceives
ca
also
ātmani
in himself
ātmānam eka-deśa-sthaṁ
ātmānam
himself
eka-deśa-stham
lying down in one place
manyate svapna utthitaḥ
manyate
he considers
svapne
in the dreaming condition
utthitaḥ
waking up
evaṁ jāgaraṇādīni
evam
in this way
jāgaraṇa-ādīni
the states of wakefulness and so on
jīva-sthānāni cātmanaḥ
jīva-sthānāni
the living entity’s different conditions of existence
ca
also
ātmanaḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
māyā-mātrāṇi vijñāya
māyā-mātrāṇi
the exhibitions of the illusory potency
vijñāya
knowing
tad-draṣṭāraṁ paraṁ smaret
tat
of them
draṣṭāram
the creator or seer of all such conditions
param
the Supreme
smaret
one should always remember.
When a person is in deep sleep, he dreams and sees in himself many other objects, such as great mountains and rivers or perhaps even the entire universe, although they are far away. Sometimes when one awakens from a dream he sees that he is in a human form, lying in his bed in one place. Then he sees himself, in terms of various conditions, as belonging to a particular nationality, family and so on. All the conditions of deep sleep, dreaming and wakefulness are but energies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. One should always remember the original creator of these conditions, the Supreme Lord, who is unaffected by them.

None of these conditions of the living entities — namely, deep sleep, dreaming and wakefulness — is substantial. They are simply displays of various phases of conditional life. There may be many mountains, rivers, trees, bees, tigers and snakes that are situated far away, but in a dream one may imagine them to be nearby. Similarly, as one has subtle dreams at night, when the living entity is awake he lives in gross dreams of nation, community, society, possessions, skyscrapers, bank balance, position and honor. Under the circumstances, one should know that his position is due to his contact with the material world. One is situated in different positions in various forms of life that are all but creations of the illusory energy, which works under the direction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Supreme Lord is the ultimate actor, and the conditioned living entity should simply remember this original actor, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. As living entities, we are being carried away by the waves of prakṛti, or nature, which works under the Lord’s direction ( mayādhyakṣeṇa prakṛtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram ). Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura sings, (miche) māyāra vaśe, yāccha bhese’, khāccha hābuḍubu, bhāi: “Why are you being carried away by the waves of the illusory energy in various phases of dreaming and wakefulness? These are all creations of māyā. ” Our only duty is to remember the supreme director of this illusory energy — Kṛṣṇa. For us to do this, the śāstra advises us, harer nāma harer nāma harer nāmaiva kevalam: one should constantly chant the holy name of the Lord — Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. The Supreme Lord is realized in three different phases, as Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān, but Bhagavān is the ultimate realization. One who realizes Bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa — is the most perfect mahātmā ( vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ ). In the human form of life, one should understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for then one will understand everything else. Yasmin vijñāte sarvam evaṁ vijñātaṁ bhavati ( Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 1.3). According to this Vedic injunction, simply by understanding Kṛṣṇa one understands Brahman, Paramātmā, prakṛti, the illusory energy, the spiritual energy and everything else. Everything will be revealed. Prakṛti, the material nature, is working under the direction of the Supreme Lord, and we living entities are being carried away by various phases of prakṛti. For self-realization, one should always remember Kṛṣṇa. As stated in Padma Purāṇa, smartavyaḥ satataṁ viṣṇuḥ: we should always remember Lord Viṣṇu. Vismartavyo na jātucit: we should never forget the Lord. This is the perfection of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A sleeping person in a dream sees many objects of a dream world within himself, but on waking up realizes his body is in one particular place, and the dream experience was unreal. Similarly, the states of waking, sleeping and dreaming, conditions of the jīva, are caused by a covering of material intelligence and should be realized to be only māyā. One should therefore meditate only on the supreme seer of all these states, the Paramātmā. Rejecting impermanent objects and unreal objects one should worship my form as antaryāmī. This is explained in two verses. Within a dream, a person comfortably sleeping sees a dream. By illusion he sees mountains or forests of the universe within himself. Awaking from the dream, he considers that he is in one place, on his bed. In the waking state, he considers the dream mountain and forest different from himself. Just as the dream objects are considered unreal on waking, so the real objects of this world in waking state should be considered unreal since they are temporary. Having understood that these conditions of the jīva, the conditions of the intelligence covering the jīva, are only māyā of the Lord (ātmanaḥ), since they are the products of his māyā-śakti, one should meditate on the superior seer of these conditions, the antaryāmī. The jīva is not indicated here. The states of waking, dreaming and deep sleep in a dreaming person are all ignorance, since they are created by the jīva in ignorance. Thus they are actually unreal. Similarly the states of waking and sleeping and dreaming, created by the Lord’s māyā-śakti, are simply māyā and therefore “unreal.” However, mountains, forests, snakes, tigers, elephants and horses in a dream are created by the jīva through ignorance, and are therefore factually unreal objects.
In deep sleep one dreams of mountains and rivers; on waking, sees one is in bed. Worldly states are similar dreams from which one wakes. The dreaming/waking metaphor is consistent and demanding.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'waking life' am I being asked to see as dream?
  • What would 'waking up' actually look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.55

↗
येन प्रसुप्त: पुरुष: स्वापं वेदात्मनस्तदा । सुखं च निर्गुणं ब्रह्म तमात्मानमवेहि माम् ॥ ५५ ॥
yena prasuptaḥ puruṣaḥ
[yena prasuptah purushah]
svāpaṁ vedātmanas tadā
[svaapam vedaatmanas tadaa]
sukhaṁ ca nirguṇaṁ brahma
[sukham cha nirgunam brahma]
tam ātmānam avehi mām
[tam aatmaanam avehi maam]
yena — by whom (the Supreme Brahman) prasuptaḥ — sleeping puruṣaḥ — a man svāpam — the subject of a dream veda — knows ātmanaḥ — of himself tadā — at that time sukham — happiness ca — also nirguṇam — without contact with the material environment brahma — the supreme spirit tam — Him ātmānam — the pervader avehi — just know mām — Me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yena prasuptaḥ puruṣaḥ
yena
by whom (the Supreme Brahman)
prasuptaḥ
sleeping
puruṣaḥ
a man
svāpaṁ vedātmanas tadā
svāpam
the subject of a dream
veda
knows
ātmanaḥ
of himself
tadā
at that time
sukhaṁ ca nirguṇaṁ brahma
sukham
happiness
ca
also
nirguṇam
without contact with the material environment
brahma
the supreme spirit
tam ātmānam avehi mām
tam
Him
ātmānam
the pervader
avehi
just know
mām
Me.
Know Me to be the Supreme Brahman, the all-pervading Supersoul through whom the sleeping living entity can understand his dreaming condition and his happiness beyond the activities of the material senses. That is to say, I am the cause of the activities of the sleeping living being.

When the living entity becomes free from false ego, he understands his superior position as a spirit soul, part and parcel of the pleasure potency of the Lord. Thus, due to Brahman, even while sleeping the living entity can enjoy. The Lord says, “That Brahman, that Paramātmā and that Bhagavān are I Myself.” This is noted by Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī in his Krama-sandarbha.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Know the Paramātmā, by whom the sleeping person knows his sleeping condition and in deep sleep is able to know the happiness of Brahman without objects or qualities. “How then do I know the antaryāmī?” Know the antaryāmī (ātmānam) by whom the jīva, like a sleeping person, knows his sleeping state, and in a deep sleep state knows happiness of the Lord with no object (nirguṇam). It should be clearly understood that it is the antaryāmī who daily dissolves the guṇas during deep sleep by his mercy and gives the jīva, whose knowledge and bliss are covered by firm bondage of the guṇas, an experience of his nirguṇa happiness. The jīva cannot independently get free from his bondage and then experience that happiness by his own strength. Understand that antaryāmī is Brahman, with no qualities. Also understand Brahman as me, Bhagavān with qualities. I, one person, exist as Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān. These are not my first, second and third forms. (I have only one form.) It is said artho durghaṭa iva bhavati svarūpa-dvayābhāvāt: nothing is impossible for you because you have only one form. (SB 6.9.36)
Know Me as the Supreme Brahman and Supersoul who enables both dream and waking; I am the cause of both. The metaphysical ground is one — the Lord behind both.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I credit waking-mind for what the deeper substrate is doing?
  • What practice deepens awareness of the substrate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.56

↗
उभयं स्मरत: पुंस: प्रस्वापप्रतिबोधयो: । अन्वेति व्यतिरिच्येत तज्ज्ञानं ब्रह्म तत्परम् ॥ ५६ ॥
ubhayaṁ smarataḥ puṁsaḥ
[ubhayam smaratah pumsah]
prasvāpa-pratibodhayoḥ
[prasvaapa-pratibodhayoh]
anveti vyatiricyeta
[anveti vyatirichyeta]
taj jñānaṁ brahma tat param
[taj jnaanam brahma tat param]
ubhayam — both types of consciousness (sleep and wakefulness) smarataḥ — remembering puṁsaḥ — of the person prasvāpa — of consciousness during sleep pratibodhayoḥ — and of consciousness while awake anveti — extends through vyatiricyeta — may reach beyond tat — that jñānam — knowledge brahma — the Supreme Brahman tat — that param — transcendental.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ubhayaṁ smarataḥ puṁsaḥ
ubhayam
both types of consciousness (sleep and wakefulness)
smarataḥ
remembering
puṁsaḥ
of the person
prasvāpa-pratibodhayoḥ
prasvāpa
of consciousness during sleep
pratibodhayoḥ
and of consciousness while awake
anveti vyatiricyeta
anveti
extends through
vyatiricyeta
may reach beyond
taj jñānaṁ brahma tat param
tat
that
jñānam
knowledge
brahma
the Supreme Brahman
tat
that
param
transcendental.
If one’s dreams during sleep are merely subject matters witnessed by the Supersoul, how can the living entity, who is different from the Supersoul, remember the activities of dreams? The experiences of one person cannot be understood by another. Therefore the knower of the facts, the living entity who inquires into the incidents manifested in dreams and wakefulness, is different from the circumstantial activities. That knowing factor is Brahman. In other words, the quality of knowing belongs to the living entities and to the Supreme Soul. Thus the living entity can also experience the activities of dreams and wakefulness. In both stages the knower is unchanged, but is qualitatively one with the Supreme Brahman.

In knowledge the living entity is qualitatively one with the Supreme Brahman, but the quantity of the Supreme Brahman is not the same as that of the living entity, who is part of Brahman. Because the living entity is Brahman in quality, he can remember the past activities of dreams and also know the present activities of wakefulness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That which remains during the waking and deep sleep states of the person observing those states, and which is different from them, is the jīva. Superior to the jīva is Brahman. “How does the person in waking state remember what was observed by the witness during sleep, and thus say ‘I slept happily.’ One person cannot remember what was experienced by another person.” That which is present during the deep sleep and waking states of the man who investigates those states, and which is different from them, which continues while these states appear and disappear, is the jīva (jñānam). Just as one remembers during youth what was seen during childhood, even though the conditions are different, one remembers the bliss of deep sleep on waking. Superior to the jīva is Brahman. The jīva is not Brahman. Though the jīva is also the Lord because of being his taṭastha-śakti, the jīva does not belong to the Lord’s svarūpa-śakti. Thus it is different from Brahman.
If dreams were merely observed by the Supersoul, how could the entity remember them? One person can't access another's experience; therefore the entity is intimately involved. The argument insists on real connection between self and Lord within dream.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I treating my experience as private when it is actually witnessed by the Lord?
  • How does shared witness change responsibility?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.57

↗
यदेतद्विस्मृतं पुंसो मद्भ‍ावं भिन्नमात्मन: । तत: संसार एतस्य देहाद्देहो मृतेर्मृति: ॥ ५७ ॥
yad etad vismṛtaṁ puṁso
[yad etad vismritam pumso]
mad-bhāvaṁ bhinnam ātmanaḥ
[mad-bhaavam bhinnam aatmanah]
tataḥ saṁsāra etasya
[tatah samsaara etasya]
dehād deho mṛter mṛtiḥ
[dehaad deho mriter mritih]
yat — which etat — this vismṛtam — forgotten puṁsaḥ — of the living entity mat-bhāvam — My spiritual position bhinnam — separation ātmanaḥ — from the Supreme Soul tataḥ — from that saṁsāraḥ — material, conditional life etasya — of the living entity dehāt — from one body dehaḥ — another body mṛteḥ — from one death mṛtiḥ — another death.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad etad vismṛtaṁ puṁso
yat
which
etat
this
vismṛtam
forgotten
puṁsaḥ
of the living entity
mad-bhāvaṁ bhinnam ātmanaḥ
mat-bhāvam
My spiritual position
bhinnam
separation
ātmanaḥ
from the Supreme Soul
tataḥ saṁsāra etasya
tataḥ
from that
saṁsāraḥ
material, conditional life
etasya
of the living entity
dehād deho mṛter mṛtiḥ
dehāt
from one body
dehaḥ
another body
mṛteḥ
from one death
mṛtiḥ
another death.
When a living entity, thinking himself different from Me, forgets his spiritual identity of qualitative oneness with Me in eternity, knowledge and bliss, his material, conditional life begins. In other words, instead of identifying his interest with Mine, he becomes interested in his bodily expansions like his wife, children and material possessions. In this way, by the influence of his actions, one body comes from another, and after one death, another death takes place.

Generally the Māyāvādī philosophers or persons influenced by Māyāvādī philosophers think themselves as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is the cause of their conditional life. As stated by the Vaiṣṇava poet Jagadānanda Paṇḍita in his Prema-vivarta:

kṛṣṇa-bahirmukha haṣā bhoga vāñchā kare nikaṭa-stha māyā tāre jāpaṭiyā dhare

As soon as a living entity forgets his constitutional position and endeavors to become one with the Supreme, his conditional life begins. The conception that the Supreme Brahman and the living entity are equal not only in quality but also in quantity is the cause of conditional life. If one forgets the difference between the Supreme Lord and the living entity, his conditional life begins. Conditional life means giving up one body to accept another and undergoing death to accept death again. The Māyāvādī philosopher teaches the philosophy of tat tvam asi, saying, “You are the same as God.” He forgets that tat tvam asi applies in terms of the marginal position of the living entity, who is like sunshine. There is heat and light in the sun, and there is heat and light in the sunshine, and thus they are qualitatively one. But one should not forget that the sunshine rests on the sun. As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā, brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭhāham: “I am the original source of Brahman.” The sunshine is important because of the presence of the sun globe. It is not that the sun globe is important because of the all-pervasiveness of the sunshine. Forgetfulness and misunderstanding of this fact is called māyā. Because of forgetfulness of one’s constitutional position and that of the Supreme Lord, one comes into māyā, or saṁsāra — conditional life. In this regard, Madhvācārya says:

sarva-bhinnaṁ parātmānaṁ vismaran saṁsared iha abhinnaṁ saṁsmaran yāti tamo nāsty atra saṁśayaḥ

When one thinks that the living entity is nondifferent in all respects from the Supreme Lord, there is no doubt that he is in ignorance ( tamaḥ ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A person who forgets that my svarūpa is different from the jīva continues in saṁsāra, taking body after body, death after death. To think that the Brahman and jīva are one is an offense and the cause of obstacles. That is expressed in this verse. My svarūpa (mad-bhāvam) is different from the jīva (ātmanaḥ). Neutral gender is poetic license. If the jīva forgets this, and thinks he is identical with me, then because of this, such a person will end up in saṁsāra. Saṁsāra is described: it is getting one body after another, one death after another. Thus, one can think of oneness of the jīva and Brahman like the oneness of the sun and its rays, since jīva is the same by being the Lord’s taṭastha-śakti. That is the meaning of tat tvam asi: you are the Brahman. As well, temporary objects of the universe are also one with the Brahman since they are products of the Lord’s material śakti. Though the material world is one with the Lord, it is different because it does not arise from the svarūpa of the Lord. This causes it to be destructible. Since the pure jīva is included among the permanent real objects because that jīva is not destructible, it is also one with the Lord since it the Lord’s taṭaṣṭha-śakti, but it does not arise from the Lord’s svarūpa. The permanent objects Brahman, Paramātmā and Bhagavān however are one because they are one svarūpa. Because the forms of the associates of Bhagavān arise from the actions of the cit-śakti (the Lord’s svarūpa), those associates who are nitya-siddha are also permanent objects which are the Lord’s svarūpa. And some jīvas with desires for dāsya and other relationships, who have perfected themselves by pure bhakti or by mercy of nitya-mukta bhaktas, are included among the eternal associates as dāsas. They are also considered to be non-different from the svarūpa of the Lord, since they are empowered by the svarūpa-śakti. Those jīvas who have perfected themselves by mixed bhakti become śānta-bhaktas and are not empowered by the Lord’s svarūpa-śakti since they not included among the dāsas or other associates. They are also eternal objects, but not part of the Lord’s svarūpa. Thus there is non-difference from the Lord because of the many śaktis of the Lord. Incidentally, the Vaiṣṇava conclusions have been stated.
When the entity, forgetting his oneness with Me in eternity, knowledge, and bliss, identifies with the body, material life begins. Bondage = misidentification.
Reflection Questions
  • What misidentification of mine is the actual root of my struggle?
  • What practice undoes that specific misidentification?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.58

↗
लब्ध्वेह मानुषीं योनिं ज्ञानविज्ञानसम्भवाम् । आत्मानं यो न बुद्ध्येत न क्‍वचित्क्षेममाप्नुयात् ॥ ५८ ॥
labdhveha mānuṣīṁ yoniṁ
[labdhveha maanusheem yonim]
jñāna-vijñāna-sambhavām
[jnaana-vijnaana-sambhavaam]
ātmānaṁ yo na buddhyeta
[aatmaanam yo na buddhyeta]
na kvacit kṣemam āpnuyāt
[na kvachit kshemam aapnuyaat]
labdhvā — achieving iha — in this material world (especially in this pious land of Bhārata-varṣa, India) mānuṣīm — the human yonim — species jñāna — of knowledge through Vedic scriptures vijñāna — and practical application of that knowledge in life sambhavām — wherein there is a possibility ātmānam — one’s real identity yaḥ — anyone who na — not buddhyeta — understands na — never kvacit — at any time kṣemam — success in life āpnuyāt — can obtain.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
labdhveha mānuṣīṁ yoniṁ
labdhvā
achieving
iha
in this material world (especially in this pious land of Bhārata-varṣa, India)
mānuṣīm
the human
yonim
species
jñāna-vijñāna-sambhavām
jñāna
of knowledge through Vedic scriptures
vijñāna
and practical application of that knowledge in life
sambhavām
wherein there is a possibility
ātmānaṁ yo na buddhyeta
ātmānam
one’s real identity
na kvacit kṣemam āpnuyāt
yaḥ
anyone who
na
not
buddhyeta
understands
na
never
kvacit
at any time
kṣemam
success in life
āpnuyāt
can obtain.
A human being can attain perfection in life by self-realization through the Vedic literature and its practical application. This is possible especially for a human being born in India, the land of piety. A man who obtains birth in such a convenient position but does not understand his self is unable to achieve the highest perfection, even if he is exalted to life in the higher planetary systems.

This statement is confirmed in Caitanya-caritāmṛta ( Ādi 9.41) . Lord Caitanya said:

bhārata-bhūmite haila manuṣya-janma yāra janma sārthaka kari’ kara para-upakāra

Everyone born in India, especially as a human being, can achieve the supreme success through the Vedic literature and its practical application in life. When one is perfect, he can render a service for the self-realization of the entire human society. This is the best way to perform humanitarian work.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having achieved human birth in which scriptural knowledge and direct perception of the Lord are possible, a person who does not understand about the jīva and the Supreme Lord does not attain any benefit at all from that birth. One must strive for such knowledge. Jñānam here refers to knowledge arising from scriptures. Vijñānam means direct realization of the Lord. Both jñāna and vijñāna are possible in human birth. Aṭmānam here means the jīva and the Supreme Lord.
A human being, especially in India, can attain perfection by Vedic literature applied; otherwise life is wasted. Geography and birth matter; tradition matters; application matters.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I taken seriously the spiritual advantage of the tradition I was given?
  • Where am I letting that advantage slip into waste?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.59

↗
स्मृत्वेहायां परिक्लेशं तत: फलविपर्ययम् । अभयं चाप्यनीहायां सङ्कल्पाद्विरमेत्कवि: ॥ ५९ ॥
smṛtvehāyāṁ parikleśaṁ
[smritvehaayaam pariklesham]
tataḥ phala-viparyayam
[tatah phala-viparyayam]
abhayaṁ cāpy anīhāyāṁ
[abhayam chaapy aneehaayaam]
saṅkalpād viramet kaviḥ
[sankalpaad viramet kavih]
smṛtvā — remembering īhāyām — in the field of activities with fruitive results parikleśam — the waste of energy and the miserable conditions tataḥ — from that phala-viparyayam — the opposite of the desired result abhayam — fearlessness ca — also api — indeed anīhāyām — when there is no desire for fruitive results saṅkalpāt — from material desire viramet — should cease kaviḥ — one who is advanced in knowledge.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
smṛtvehāyāṁ parikleśaṁ
smṛtvā
remembering
tataḥ phala-viparyayam
abhayaṁ cāpy anīhāyāṁ
īhāyām
in the field of activities with fruitive results
saṅkalpād viramet kaviḥ
parikleśam
the waste of energy and the miserable conditions
tataḥ
from that
phala-viparyayam
the opposite of the desired result
abhayam
fearlessness
ca
also
api
indeed
anīhāyām
when there is no desire for fruitive results
saṅkalpāt
from material desire
viramet
should cease
kaviḥ
one who is advanced in knowledge.
Remembering the great trouble found in the field of activities performed for fruitive results, and remembering how one receives the reverse of the results one desires — whether from material actions or from the fruitive activities recommended in the Vedic literatures — an intelligent man should cease from the desire for fruitive actions, for by such endeavors one cannot achieve the ultimate goal of life. On the other hand, if one acts without desires for fruitive results — in other words, if one engages in devotional activities — he can achieve the highest goal of life with freedom from miserable conditions. Considering this, one should cease from material desires.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Remembering the misery produced from action caused by material desire, which brings an opposite result, and remembering a condition without fear from action without material desire, the wise man should give up determination to enjoy in this world. A person desiring this knowledge, understanding that karma brings results now and in the future, should give up faith in karma. Īhāyām means “endeavoring with desire for enjoyment.” Anīhāyām means” acting without material desires.” Abhayam means “no fear in any circumstance.” Instead of abhayam some versions have nobhayam. The meaning is then “remembering action without desire which does not produce material suffering or enjoyment.”
Remembering the trouble of fruitive activity, the reverse results that come, and that even Vedic prescribed activities have their own pain, one detaches. Detachment grows from seeing through the system.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'reverse result' from my hard work do I keep ignoring?
  • What if both worldly and even ritual goals were not the path?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.60

↗
सुखाय दु:खमोक्षाय कुर्वाते दम्पती क्रिया: । ततोऽनिवृत्तिरप्राप्तिर्दु:खस्य च सुखस्य च ॥ ६० ॥
sukhāya duḥkha-mokṣāya
[sukhaaya duhkha-mokshaaya]
kurvāte dampatī kriyāḥ
[kurvaate dampatee kriyaah]
tato ’nivṛttir aprāptir
[tato ’nivrittir apraaptir]
duḥkhasya ca sukhasya ca
[duhkhasya cha sukhasya cha]
sukhāya — for happiness duḥkha-mokṣāya — for release from the unhappy state kurvāte — perform dam-patī — the wife and husband kriyāḥ — activities tataḥ — from that anivṛttiḥ — no cessation aprāptiḥ — no achievement duḥkhasya — of distress ca — also sukhasya — of happiness ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sukhāya duḥkha-mokṣāya
sukhāya
for happiness
duḥkha-mokṣāya
for release from the unhappy state
kurvāte dampatī kriyāḥ
kurvāte
perform
dam-patī
the wife and husband
kriyāḥ
activities
tato ’nivṛttir aprāptir
tataḥ
from that
anivṛttiḥ
no cessation
aprāptiḥ
no achievement
duḥkhasya ca sukhasya ca
duḥkhasya
of distress
ca
also
sukhasya
of happiness
ca
also.
As husband and wife, a man and woman plan together to attain happiness and decrease unhappiness, working jointly in many ways, but because their activities are full of desires, these activities are never a source of happiness, and they never diminish distress. On the contrary, they are a cause of great unhappiness.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Husband and wife perform actions to produce happiness and to destroy misery. But there is no cessation of suffering and no attainment of happiness. This is further described in three verses. There is no destruction of suffering and no attainment of happiness.
Husband and wife plan jointly for happiness and reduction of unhappiness, but their activity is full of desires and never delivers happiness. Even the model of relational planning fails to deliver.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying to engineer happiness with my spouse or partner through desire-based plans?
  • What would 'less desire, more shared service' look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.61-62

↗
एवं विपर्ययं बुद्ध्वा नृणां विज्ञाभिमानिनाम् । आत्मनश्च गतिं सूक्ष्मां स्थानत्रयविलक्षणाम् ॥ ६१ ॥ द‍ृष्टश्रुताभिर्मात्राभिर्निर्मुक्त: स्वेन तेजसा । ज्ञानविज्ञानसन्तृप्तो मद्भ‍क्त: पुरुषो भवेत् ॥ ६२ ॥
evaṁ viparyayaṁ buddhvā
[evam viparyayam buddhvaa]
nṛṇāṁ vijñābhimāninām
[nrinaam vijnaabhimaaninaam]
ātmanaś ca gatiṁ sūkṣmāṁ
[aatmanash cha gatim sookshmaam]
sthāna-traya-vilakṣaṇām
[sthaana-traya-vilakshanaam]
dṛṣṭa-śrutābhir mātrābhir
[drishta-shrutaabhir maatraabhir]
nirmuktaḥ svena tejasā
[nirmuktah svena tejasaa]
jñāna-vijñāna-santṛpto
[jnaana-vijnaana-santripto]
mad-bhaktaḥ puruṣo bhavet
[mad-bhaktah purusho bhavet]
evam — in this way viparyayam — reversal buddhvā — realizing nṛṇām — of men vijña-abhimāninām — who think of themselves as full of scientific knowledge ātmanaḥ — of the self ca — also gatim — the progress sūkṣmām — extremely difficult to understand sthāna-traya — the three conditions of life (deep sleep, dreaming and wakefulness) vilakṣaṇām — apart from dṛṣṭa — directly perceived śrutābhiḥ — or understood by information from authorities mātrābhiḥ — from objects nirmuktaḥ — being freed svena — by one’s own tejasā — strength of consideration jñāna-vijñāna — with knowledge and practical application of the knowledge santṛptaḥ — being fully satisfied mat-bhaktaḥ — My devotee puruṣaḥ — a person bhavet — should become.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ viparyayaṁ buddhvā
evam
in this way
viparyayam
reversal
buddhvā
realizing
nṛṇāṁ vijñābhimāninām
nṛṇām
of men
vijña-abhimāninām
who think of themselves as full of scientific knowledge
ātmanaś ca gatiṁ sūkṣmāṁ
ātmanaḥ
of the self
ca
also
gatim
the progress
sūkṣmām
extremely difficult to understand
sthāna-traya-vilakṣaṇām
sthāna-traya
the three conditions of life (deep sleep, dreaming and wakefulness)
vilakṣaṇām
apart from
dṛṣṭa-śrutābhir mātrābhir
dṛṣṭa
directly perceived
śrutābhiḥ
or understood by information from authorities
mātrābhiḥ
from objects
nirmuktaḥ svena tejasā
nirmuktaḥ
being freed
svena
by one’s own
tejasā
strength of consideration
jñāna-vijñāna-santṛpto
jñāna-vijñāna
with knowledge and practical application of the knowledge
santṛptaḥ
being fully satisfied
mad-bhaktaḥ puruṣo bhavet
mat-bhaktaḥ
My devotee
puruṣaḥ
a person
bhavet
should become.
One should understand that the activities of persons who are proud of their material experience bring only results contradictory to those such persons conceive while awake, sleeping and deeply sleeping. One should further understand that the spirit soul, although very difficult for the materialist to perceive, is above all these conditions, and by the strength of one’s discrimination, one should give up the desire for fruitive results in the present life and in the next. Thus becoming experienced in transcendental knowledge, one should become My devotee.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understanding the attainment of opposite results for persons doing karma, and understanding the subtle state of spiritual realization beyond the states of waking, sleeping and deep sleep, freeing oneself from all sense objects seen and heard, and being satisfied with scriptural knowledge and realization by one’s sādhana, one should become my devotee. Sthāna-traya-vilakṣaṇām means the fourth state of spiritual realization. Mātrābhiḥ means “from sense objects.” Sva-tejasā means “by ones sādhana.”
Activities by those proud of material experience produce contradictory results in waking, dream, and deep sleep; recognize the underlying mistake. The full three-state analysis reveals the structural error.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do my waking, dream, and sleep states show the same contradictory result?
  • What underlying mistake would touching all three reveal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.63

↗
एतावानेव मनुजैर्योगनैपुण्यबुद्धिभि: । स्वार्थ: सर्वात्मना ज्ञेयो यत्परात्मैकदर्शनम् ॥ ६३ ॥
etāvān eva manujair
[etaavaan eva manujair]
yoga-naipuṇya-buddhibhiḥ
[yoga-naipunya-buddhibhih]
svārthaḥ sarvātmanā jñeyo
[svaarthah sarvaatmanaa jneyo]
yat parātmaika-darśanam
[yat paraatmaika-darshanam]
etāvān — this much eva — indeed manujaiḥ — by human beings yoga — by the process of linking with the Supreme by bhakti-yoga naipuṇya — endowed with expertise buddhibhiḥ — who have intelligence sva-arthaḥ — the ultimate goal of life sarva-ātmanā — by all means jñeyaḥ — to be known yat — which para — of the transcendental Lord ātma — and of the soul eka — of the oneness darśanam — understanding.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etāvān eva manujair
etāvān
this much
eva
indeed
manujaiḥ
by human beings
yoga-naipuṇya-buddhibhiḥ
yoga
by the process of linking with the Supreme by bhakti-yoga
naipuṇya
endowed with expertise
buddhibhiḥ
who have intelligence
svārthaḥ sarvātmanā jñeyo
sva-arthaḥ
the ultimate goal of life
sarva-ātmanā
by all means
jñeyaḥ
to be known
yat parātmaika-darśanam
yat
which
para
of the transcendental Lord
ātma
and of the soul
eka
of the oneness
darśanam
understanding.
Persons who try to reach the ultimate goal of life must expertly observe the Supreme Absolute Person and the living entity, who are one in quality in their relationship as part and whole. This is the ultimate understanding of life. There is no better truth than this.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Humans whose intelligence is fixed in skilful practice of yoga should understand by all efforts this goal consisting only of realization of Paramātmā. Parātmaika-darśanam means realization of the supreme soul, Paramātmā and nothing else.
Expert observers see the Lord and the entity as one in quality, as part and whole — there is no other way to interpret duality. The ultimate philosophical conclusion is part-whole.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I tried out the part-whole framework as a working hypothesis?
  • What would change in my prayer if I held it consistently?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.64

↗
त्वमेतच्छ्रद्धया राजन्नप्रमत्तो वचो मम । ज्ञानविज्ञानसम्पन्नो धारयन्नाशु सिध्यसि ॥ ६४ ॥
tvam etac chraddhayā rājann
[tvam etach chraddhayaa raajann]
apramatto vaco mama
[apramatto vacho mama]
jñāna-vijñāna-sampanno
[jnaana-vijnaana-sampanno]
dhārayann āśu sidhyasi
[dhaarayann aashu sidhyasi]
tvam — you etat — this śraddhayā — with great faith and allegiance rājan — O King apramattaḥ — without being mad or deviated to any other conclusion vacaḥ — instruction mama — of Me jñāna-vijñāna-sampannaḥ — being fully aware of knowledge and its practical application in life dhārayan — accepting āśu — very soon sidhyasi — you will become the most perfect.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvam etac chraddhayā rājann
tvam
you
etat
this
śraddhayā
with great faith and allegiance
rājan
O King
apramatto vaco mama
apramattaḥ
without being mad or deviated to any other conclusion
vacaḥ
instruction
mama
of Me
jñāna-vijñāna-sampanno
jñāna-vijñāna-sampannaḥ
being fully aware of knowledge and its practical application in life
dhārayann āśu sidhyasi
dhārayan
accepting
āśu
very soon
sidhyasi
you will become the most perfect.
O King, if you accept this conclusion of Mine, being unattached to material enjoyment, adhering to Me with great faith and thus becoming proficient and fully aware of knowledge and its practical application in life, you will achieve the highest perfection by attaining Me.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Accepting my words with faith, being attentive, and being endowed with scriptural knowledge and realization, you will quickly attain perfection.
If you accept this conclusion, unattached to enjoyment, adhering to Me with faith, proficient in knowledge and practice, you will achieve the highest perfection. The promise rests on a specific posture.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of the four conditions (acceptance, detachment, adherence, proficiency) am I weakest in?
  • What practice would strengthen that one?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.16.65

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच आश्वास्य भगवानित्थं चित्रकेतुं जगद्गुरु: । पश्यतस्तस्य विश्वात्मा ततश्चान्तर्दधे हरि: ॥ ६५ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
āśvāsya bhagavān itthaṁ
[aashvaasya bhagavaan ittham]
citraketuṁ jagad-guruḥ
[chitraketum jagad-guruh]
paśyatas tasya viśvātmā
[pashyatas tasya vishvaatmaa]
tataś cāntardadhe hariḥ
[tatash chaantardadhe harih]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said āśvāsya — assuring bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead ittham — thus citraketum — King Citraketu jagat-guruḥ — the supreme spiritual master paśyataḥ — while looking on tasya — he viśva-ātmā — the Supersoul of the whole universe tataḥ — from there ca — also antardadhe — disappeared hariḥ — Lord Hari.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
āśvāsya bhagavān itthaṁ
āśvāsya
assuring
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
ittham
thus
citraketuṁ jagad-guruḥ
citraketum
King Citraketu
jagat-guruḥ
the supreme spiritual master
paśyatas tasya viśvātmā
paśyataḥ
while looking on
tasya
he
viśva-ātmā
the Supersoul of the whole universe
tataś cāntardadhe hariḥ
tataḥ
from there
ca
also
antardadhe
disappeared
hariḥ
Lord Hari.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: After thus instructing Citraketu and assuring him of perfection in this way, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is the supreme spiritual master, the supreme soul, Saṅkarṣaṇa, disappeared from that place as Citraketu looked on.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Sixth Canto, Sixteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “King Citraketu Meets the Supreme Lord.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: After thus instructing Citraketu and assuring him of perfection in this way, the Supreme Lord, who is the supreme guru, the soul of the universe, disappeared as Citraketu watched. Thus ends the commentary on the Sixteenth Chapter of the Sixth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Seventeen Pārvatī Curses Citraketu 6.17: Mother Pārvatī Curses Citraketu 17. Mother Pārvatī Curses Citraketu 6.17 Summary The Seventeenth Chapter is summarized as follows. This chapter describes Citraketu's receiving the body of an asura, or demon, because of joking with Lord Śiva. After personally talking with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, King Citraketu enjoyed life in his airplane with the women of the Vidyādhara planet. Engaging in the congregational chanting of the glories of the Lord, he began flying his plane and traveling in outer space. One day while traveling like this, he wandered into the bowers of Sumeru Mountain, where he came upon Lord Śiva embracing Pārvatī, surrounded by an assembly of Siddhas, Cāraṇas and great sages. Seeing Lord Śiva in that situation, Citraketu laughed very loudly, but Pārvatī became very angry at him and cursed him. Because of this curse, Citraketu later appeared as the demon Vṛtrāsura. Citraketu, however, was not at all afraid of Pārvatī's curse, and thus he spoke as follows: "Everyone in human society enjoys happiness and distress according to his past deeds and in this way travels in the material world. Therefore no one is responsible for his happiness and distress. One is controlled by the influence of material nature in the material world, yet one thinks himself the doer of everything. In this material world, which is made of the external energy of the Supreme Lord, one is sometimes cursed and sometimes favored, and thus he sometimes enjoys in the upper planetary systems and sometimes suffers in the lower planets, but all these situations are the same because they are within this material world. None of these positions has any factual existence, for all of them are temporary. The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the ultimate controller because the material world is created, maintained and annihilated under His control while He nonetheless remains neutral to these different transformations of the material world in time and space. The material, external energy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is in charge of this material world. The Lord helps the world by creating situations for the living entities within it." When Citraketu spoke in this way, all the members in the great assembly in which Lord Śiva and Pārvatī were present were astonished. Then Lord Śiva began speaking about the devotees of the Lord. A devotee is neutral in all conditions of life, whether in the heavenly planets or hellish planets, whether liberated from the material world or conditioned by it, and whether blessed with happiness or subjected to distress. These are all merely dualities created by the external energy. Being influenced by the external energy, the living entity accepts a gross and subtle material body, and in this illusory position he apparently suffers miseries, although everyone is part and parcel of the Supreme Lord. The so-called demigods consider themselves independent lords, and in this way they are misled from understanding that all living entities are part of the Supreme. This chapter concludes by glorifying the devotee and the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Having so instructed Citraketu, Saṅkarṣaṇa disappeared while Citraketu watched. The Lord's instruction sometimes ends with His withdrawal; the work then is the disciple's.
Reflection Questions
  • What instruction am I still living from after the visible support has withdrawn?
  • How can I make the visible withdrawal a deepening, not a loss?
📝 My note