FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

7.2 · Hiraṇyakaśipu, King of the Demons

55 verses · 🖨 Class prep
O Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (13063 chars)

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Hiranyakasipu tried to gain complete control of the universe and became highly oppressive, displaying the grotesque and predatory qualities of an ogre. He underwent extreme austerities to overcome death and requested benedictions from Brahma that would make him virtually immortal. He overpowered humans and demigods, terrorised all living entities and even forced the Gandharvas and Apsaras to dance and sing for his pleasure.

Previous O.P.E.N Next Impartiality of God Last updated 1 year ago

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4)

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Hiranyakasipu tried to gain complete control of the universe and became highly oppressive, displaying the grotesque and predatory qualities of an ogre. He underwent extreme austerities to overcome death and requested benedictions from Brahma that would make him virtually immortal. He overpowered humans and demigods, terrorised all living entities and even forced the Gandharvas and Apsaras to dance and sing for his pleasure.

Previous O.P.E.N Next Impartiality of God Last updated 1 year ago

Divine and Demoniac

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac “Although Hiranyakasipu was a demon, he had Vedic knowledge and understanding. Thus the advice given to his family members - his sister-in-law, mother and nephews - was quite sound. The demons are considered highly elevated in knowledge, but because they do not use their good intelligence for the service of the Lord, they are called demons. The demigods, however, act very intelligently to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead... To become a demigod or to become godly, whatever one’s occupation, one must satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” ( SB 7.2.21 ) There is a perpetual struggle in the universe between demigods and demons. and Krishna periodically descends to resolve the situation. As time progresses, the delineation between divine and demoniac becomes more and more vague. Previously, divine and demoniac lived on different planets. Later, however, they lived on the same planet but existed in different families. With the progression of time, they inhabited the same families, but were distinct individuals. Now we have reached the summit of degradation, where divine and demoniac exists within the same individual. Living entities exhibit traits of both, perpetually struggling between the higher and lower nature. A demon then, is not necessarily a ghastly one-eyed creature with ferocious teeth and fiery weapons. They may well be walking among us, unassuming and unidentifiable, rooted in a way of living which distances them and others from spiritual progression towards the Supreme Person. In Chapter Sixteen of the Bhagavad-gita, Krishna clearly outlines the philosophy, mentality, activity and destiny of the demons.

Previous Oppressive Ogre Next Demoniac Philosophy Last updated 1 year ago

Conquering the Demon Within

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac Conquering the Demon Within If we honestly introspect, we may well find that elements of this demoniac mentality seep into our daily interactions. Although Hiranyakasipu was indeed an extreme character, we may sense that there is a little Hiranyakasipu hiding within each one of us. The Bhagavad-gita explains that the uncontrolled mind, that devilish voice within, is conspiring against us on a moment-to-moment basis. Krishna also explains how to remedy the situation: “It is undoubtedly very difficult to curb the restless mind, but it is possible by suitable practice and by detachment” ( BG 6.35 ). Only through spiritual acumen and unbreakable determination can we transform the mind and experience true freedom, being guided by intelligence instead of instinct. An uncontrolled mind will agitate, misguide and implicate the soul, forcing us to glide down into lust, anger and greed. That mindset emphasises problems in every opportunity, dissatisfied with the present and perpetually hankering for a better future. The controlled mind, however, acts as a friend on our spiritual journey, helping us to make progressive and healthy choices which create well-being on all levels. That mindset is able to identify opportunities in every problem, ever-satisfied come what may.

Previous Demoniac Destiny Next P - Prahlada Maharaja (5-7) Last updated 1 year ago

Demoniac Activity

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac Demoniac Activity Bhagavad-gita 16.7, 9, 17 Because their mentality is so corrupt, demons repeatedly disregard spiritual wisdom and beneficial counsel. They dedicate themselves to unbeneficial acts which destroy their own well-being, cause suffering to others, and generate unrest in the world. Consciously or unconsciously, they engage in works which are painful, exploitative and destructive. They justify their approach with empty arguments and fallacious logic, actively convincing others to follow in their footsteps.

Previous Demoniac Mentality Next Demoniac Destiny Last updated 1 year ago

Demoniac Destiny

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac Demoniac Destiny Bhagavad-gita 16.11, 12, 16, 18, 19 Such a selfish approach can never bring any true happiness. Thus, demons are invariably plagued with perplexity and anxiety. Entangled in a network of destructive desires, they are filled with fear, frustration and anger in this lifetime, and after death descend into lower forms of existence where they are forced to suffer the ramifications of their acts; miserable in the now, and hellish in the future. Krishna’s message is loud and clear: demoniac philosophy breeds a demoniac mentality, the demoniac mentality leads to demoniac activity, and demoniac activities secure a demoniac destiny.

Previous Demoniac Activity Next Conquering the Demon Within Last updated 1 year ago

Demoniac Mentality

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac Demoniac Mentality Bhagavad-gita 16.13, 14, 15, 19 When one sees themselves as the enjoyer and controller, an egotistical and proud psychology naturally develops. Such demons are convinced that they have dominion over their environment and everything within it. Whatever surrounds them, they believe, is meant for their pleasure and enjoyment. They maintain friendships only as long as it facilitates their desires, and if anyone opposes their selfish worldview, they are ready to create enmity and wage war.

Previous Demoniac Philosophy Next Demoniac Activity Last updated 1 year ago

Demoniac Philosophy

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Divine and Demoniac Demoniac Philosophy Bhagavad-gita 16.8, 11, 12, 16 The primary agenda of the demons is to remove God from the picture. They posit that the world is a chance combination of matter, with no God in control and no spiritual purpose. Through jugglery of words and complex misinformation, they convince themselves and others that it is entirely rational to reject the existence of a Supreme controller. This helps them to justify their independence, and allows them to gratify the senses, exploit others, eat, drink, be merry and enjoy, free from any sense of responsibility. They promote a myriad of material desires, suppress any form of spirituality and religiosity, and reinforce a hedonistic approach to life.

Previous Divine and Demoniac Next Demoniac Mentality Last updated 1 year ago

Hiranyakasipu - Aggrieved but Philosophical

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Hiranyakasipu - Aggrieved but Philosophical Chapter 2 Maharaja Yuddhistira enquired about the enmity between the boy-saint Prahlada and his father, Hiranyakasipu. Narada Muni thus narrated the dramatic history. After Varahadeva killed Hiranyaksa, Hiranyakasipu seethed with anger and accused the Lord of partiality. He was hell-bent on gaining revenge. Assisted by his demoniac associates, Hiranyakasipu wreaked havoc in the universe, burning villages, attacking sages, killing cows and performing an array of other atrocities. Though engaged in such abominable violence, Hiranyakasipu simultaneously performed the religious rites for his brother’s funeral and comforted his grieving relatives with profound philosophy and enlightening wisdom. He narrated how Yamaraja once appeared as a young boy to spiritually counsel some queens who had lost their husband, King Suyajna. In his discourse, Yamaraja narrated the story of the kulinga birds to teach them that if they exhaust their time in useless lamentation for their deceased husband, they will also be overcome by death in the process.

Previous Jaya and Vijaya Next Overcoming Death Last updated 1 year ago

Impartiality of God

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Impartiality of God Chapter 1 Having heard of how Krishna kills the enemies of Indra, Maharaja Pariksit questioned the impartiality of the Lord. Why does He favour some and neglect others? In response, Sukadeva Goswami explained that the Lord is completely impartial, free from duplicity, and it is rather the living entities that harbour dualities such as enmity and friendship, attachment and detachment, etc. The Lord is constantly planning to benefit all living entities, and thus, even the demons killed by the Supreme Lord attain salvation immediately. The striking example was the envious Sisupala. Anyone who comes in contact with Krishna, regardless of their mindset, will receive purification: “The gopis by their lusty desires, Kamsa by his fear, Sisupala and other kings by envy, the Yadus by their familial relationship with Krishna, you Pandavas by your great affection for Krishna, and we, the general devotees, by our devotional service, have obtained the mercy of Krishna.” (SB 7.1.31)

Previous O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Next Jaya and Vijaya Last updated 1 year ago

Jaya and Vijaya

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Jaya and Vijaya Chapter 1 When Maharaja Pariksit heard that Sisupala and Dantavakra were associates of the Lord who fell from the eternal world, he enquired further. Sukadeva Goswami thus explained the story of Jaya and Vijaya by narrating a conversation between Maharaja Yuddhistira and Narada Muni that took place just after Sisupala’s death. Once, when the Four Kumaras were entering Vaikuntha, the two gatekeepers, Jaya and Vijaya, refused them entry. Offended by their behaviour, the saintly sons of Brahma cursed the gatekeepers to descend to the material world as demons. They later became Hiranyakasipu and Hiranyaksa in Satya-yuga, Ravana and Kumbhakarna in Treta-yuga, and Sisupala and Dantavakra at the end of Dvaparayuga. After these three demoniac births they re-entered the spiritual world.

Previous Impartiality of God Next Hiranyakasipu - Aggrieved but Philosophical Last updated 1 year ago

Oppressive Ogre

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Oppressive Ogre Chapter 4 After being rewarded, Hiranyakasipu commenced his oppressive activities and conquered practically everyone in the universe. He lived in unimaginable opulence and was intoxicated by carnal pleasures, pride and power. He just couldn’t forget his brother’s death and seethed with vicious enmity towards Lord Vishnu. Brahmanas cursed him, others nervously prayed for protection, while many just surrendered out of deep fear. The Lord reassured them that Hiranyakasipu’s oppressive atrocities would eventually be the cause of his demise. His most acute mistake would be to torment his own saintly son, Prahlada. That would be intolerable to the Lord; the final straw. When Narada described the outstanding qualities of Prahlada, Maharaja Yuddhistira was dumbfounded as to how his father could direct so much aggression and anger towards such a saintly son.

Previous Overcoming Death Next Divine and Demoniac Last updated 1 year ago

Overcoming Death

O - Oppressive Ogre (1-4) Overcoming Death Chapter 3 Desiring to defy his mortality, Hiranyakasipu commenced a torturous regime of austerity and penance. The intensity of his practice generated an unbearable heat in the universe which filled the demigods with anxiety and prompted them to approach Lord Brahma. Hearing of Hiranyakasipu’s intentions to occupy his post, Brahma went to see him. Brahma was astonished to see the demon’s emaciated body and was duty-bound to offer him benedictions. He rejuvenated Hiranyakasipu’s body and enquired what his aspiration was. Hiranyakasipu offered a series of eloquent prayers and then requested several benedictions: “Please grant that I not be killed by any created living being; that I not die inside or outside any residence, during daytime or night, nor on the ground or in the sky; that I not be killed by any being created by you, nor by any weapon, nor by any human being or animal - indeed, that I not meet death from any entity, either living or nonliving; that I have no competitor; that I have sole lordship over all living beings and presiding deities; and that I acquire all mystic powers.” Brahma agreed to his request. Having seemingly covered all eventualities, Hiranyakasipu was convinced that these benedictions would secure his immortality.

Previous Hiranyakasipu - Aggrieved but Philosophical Next Oppressive Ogre Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.1

↗
श्रीनारद उवाच भ्रातर्येवं विनिहते हरिणा क्रोडमूर्तिना । हिरण्यकशिपू राजन् पर्यतप्यद्रुषा शुचा ॥ १ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
bhrātary evaṁ vinihate
[bhraatary evam vinihate]
hariṇā kroḍa-mūrtinā
[harinaa kroda-moortinaa]
hiraṇyakaśipū rājan
[hiranyakashipoo raajan]
paryatapyad ruṣā śucā
[paryatapyad rushaa shuchaa]
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada Muni said bhrātari — when the brother (Hiraṇyākṣa) evam — thus vinihate — was killed hariṇā — by Hari kroḍa-mūrtinā — in the form of the boar, Varāha hiraṇyakaśipuḥ — Hiraṇyakaśipu rājan — O King paryatapyat — was afflicted ruṣā — by anger śucā — by grief.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada Muni said
bhrātary evaṁ vinihate
bhrātari
when the brother (Hiraṇyākṣa)
evam
thus
vinihate
was killed
hariṇā kroḍa-mūrtinā
hariṇā
by Hari
kroḍa-mūrtinā
in the form of the boar, Varāha
hiraṇyakaśipū rājan
hiraṇyakaśipuḥ
Hiraṇyakaśipu
rājan
O King
paryatapyad ruṣā śucā
paryatapyat
was afflicted
ruṣā
by anger
śucā
by grief.
Śrī Nārada Muni said: My dear King Yudhiṣṭhira, when Lord Viṣṇu, in the form of Varāha, the boar, killed Hiraṇyākṣa, Hiraṇyākṣa’s brother Hiraṇyakaśipu was extremely angry and began to lament.

Yudhiṣṭhira had inquired from Nārada Muni why Hiraṇyakaśipu was so envious of his own son Prahlāda. Nārada Muni began narrating the story by explaining how Hiraṇyakaśipu had become a staunch enemy of Lord Viṣṇu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
hiraṇyakaśipū rājan paryatapyad ruṣā śucā Nārada said: O Yudhiṣṭhira! When Lord Viṣṇu, in the form of Varāha, the boar, killed Hiraṇyākṣa, Hiraṇyākṣa's brother Hiraṇyakaśipu was afflicted with anger and grief. The Second Chapter describes how Hiraṇyakaśipu, in grief for his brother’s death, engaged in destruction of dharma and pacified his friends by relating a history giving instructions on knowledge. In order explain that the cause of hating Prahlāda was hatred of the Lord, first Nārada explains the cause of hatred of the Lord.
Hiraṇyakaśipu's enmity toward Viṣṇu began with grief over his brother's death. Unresolved anger fuels the cycle of opposition to the Divine. Notice when sorrow is hardening into hatred.
Reflection Questions
  • What recent loss is quietly turning into resentment in you?
  • Where could grief, if surrendered, lead you toward God instead of away?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.2

↗
आह चेदं रुषा पूर्ण: सन्दष्टदशनच्छद: । कोपोज्ज्वलद्भ्यां चक्षुर्भ्यां निरीक्षन् धूम्रमम्बरम् ॥ २ ॥
āha cedaṁ ruṣā pūrṇaḥ
[aaha chedam rushaa poornah]
sandaṣṭa-daśana-cchadaḥ
[sandashta-dashana-chchadah]
kopojjvaladbhyāṁ cakṣurbhyāṁ
[kopojjvaladbhyaam chakshurbhyaam]
nirīkṣan dhūmram ambaram
[nireekshan dhoomram ambaram]
āha — said ca — and idam — this ruṣā — with anger pūrṇaḥ — full sandaṣṭa — bitten daśana-chadaḥ — whose lips kopa-ujjvaladbhyām — blazing with anger cakṣurbhyām — with eyes nirīkṣan — looking over dhūmram — smoky ambaram — the sky.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āha cedaṁ ruṣā pūrṇaḥ
āha
said
sandaṣṭa-daśana-cchadaḥ
kopojjvaladbhyāṁ cakṣurbhyāṁ
ca
and
idam
this
ruṣā
with anger
pūrṇaḥ
full
nirīkṣan dhūmram ambaram
sandaṣṭa
bitten
daśana-chadaḥ
whose lips
kopa-ujjvaladbhyām
blazing with anger
cakṣurbhyām
with eyes
nirīkṣan
looking over
dhūmram
smoky
ambaram
the sky.
Filled with rage and biting his lips, Hiraṇyakaśipu gazed at the sky with eyes that blazed in anger, making the whole sky smoky. Thus he began to speak.

As usual, the demon is envious of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and inimical toward Him. These were Hiraṇyakaśipu’s external bodily features as he considered how to kill Lord Viṣṇu and devastate His kingdom, Vaikuṇṭhaloka.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Filled with rage and biting his lips, Hiraṇyakaśipu, gazing at the smoky sky with eyes that blazed in anger, spoke. He looked at the sky towards Vaikuṇṭha, the abode of Viṣṇu, thinking, “I will destroy Viṣṇu and his abode with my hands.” The sky became smoky from the fire emanating from his eyes.
Filled with rage, biting his lips, Hiraṇyakaśipu makes the sky smoky with his anger. Demoniac mentality plans to destroy what it cannot dominate. The body itself betrays the inner state — fierce features mirror a fierce mind.
Reflection Questions
  • What does your face reveal about your mind when you think no one is watching?
  • When is the last time you noticed anger reshape your body before you noticed it in your thoughts?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.3

↗
करालदंष्ट्रोग्रद‍ृष्टय‍ा दुष्प्रेक्ष्यभ्रुकुटीमुख: । शूलमुद्यम्य सदसि दानवानिदमब्रवीत् ॥ ३ ॥
karāla-daṁṣṭrogra-dṛṣṭyā
[karaala-damshtrogra-drishtyaa]
duṣprekṣya-bhrukuṭī-mukhaḥ
[dushprekshya-bhrukutee-mukhah]
śūlam udyamya sadasi
[shoolam udyamya sadasi]
dānavān idam abravīt
[daanavaan idam abraveet]
karāla-daṁṣṭra — with terrible teeth ugra-dṛṣṭyā — and fierce glance duṣprekṣya — horrible to see bhru-kuṭī — with frowning eyebrows mukhaḥ — whose face śūlam — trident udyamya — raising sadasi — in the assembly dānavān — to the demons idam — this abravīt — spoke.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
karāla-daṁṣṭrogra-dṛṣṭyā
karāla-daṁṣṭra
with terrible teeth
ugra-dṛṣṭyā
and fierce glance
duṣprekṣya-bhrukuṭī-mukhaḥ
duṣprekṣya
horrible to see
bhru-kuṭī
with frowning eyebrows
mukhaḥ
whose face
śūlam udyamya sadasi
śūlam
trident
udyamya
raising
sadasi
in the assembly
dānavān idam abravīt
dānavān
to the demons
idam
this
abravīt
spoke.
Exhibiting his terrible teeth, fierce glance and frowning eyebrows, terrible to see, he took up his weapon, a trident, and thus began speaking to his associates, the assembled demons.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Exhibiting his terrifying teeth, his fierce glance and frowning eyebrows, frightening to see, he took up his trident and began speaking to the assembled demons.
Brandishing his trident and showing his terrible teeth, Hiraṇyakaśipu rallies his demonic associates. Anger naturally seeks a tribe to amplify it. Watch which company you reach for when you are most upset.
Reflection Questions
  • When you are angry, who do you call — and what does that say about your circle?
  • Which friendships intensify your worst moods rather than soften them?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.4-5

↗
भो भो दानवदैतेया द्विमूर्धंस्त्र्यक्ष शम्बर । शतबाहो हयग्रीव नमुचे पाक इल्वल ॥ ४ ॥ विप्रचित्ते मम वच: पुलोमन् शकुनादय: । श‍ृणुतानन्तरं सर्वे क्रियतामाशु मा चिरम् ॥ ५ ॥
bho bho dānava-daiteyā
[bho bho daanava-daiteyaa]
dvimūrdhaṁs tryakṣa śambara
[dvimoordhams tryaksha shambara]
śatabāho hayagrīva
[shatabaaho hayagreeva]
namuce pāka ilvala
[namuche paaka ilvala]
vipracitte mama vacaḥ
[viprachitte mama vachah]
puloman śakunādayaḥ
[puloman shakunaadayah]
śṛṇutānantaraṁ sarve
[shrinutaanantaram sarve]
kriyatām āśu mā ciram
[kriyataam aashu maa chiram]
bhoḥ — O bhoḥ — O dānava-daiteyāḥ — Dānavas and Daityas dvi-mūrdhan — Dvimūrdha (two-headed) tri-akṣa — Tryakṣa (three-eyed) śambara — Śambara śata-bāho — Śatabāhu (hundred-armed) hayagrīva — Hayagrīva (horse-headed) namuce — Namuci pāka — Pāka ilvala — Ilvala vipracitte — Vipracitti mama — my vacaḥ — words puloman — Puloma śakuna — Śakuna ādayaḥ — and others śṛṇuta — just hear anantaram — after that sarve — all kriyatām — let it be done āśu — quickly mā — do not ciram — delay.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bho bho dānava-daiteyā
bhoḥ
O
bhoḥ
O
dānava-daiteyāḥ
Dānavas and Daityas
dvimūrdhaṁs tryakṣa śambara
dvi-mūrdhan
Dvimūrdha (two-headed)
tri-akṣa
Tryakṣa (three-eyed)
śambara
Śambara
śata-bāho
Śatabāhu (hundred-armed)
śatabāho hayagrīva
hayagrīva
Hayagrīva (horse-headed)
namuce pāka ilvala
namuce
Namuci
pāka
Pāka
ilvala
Ilvala
vipracitte mama vacaḥ
vipracitte
Vipracitti
mama
my
vacaḥ
words
puloman śakunādayaḥ
puloman
Puloma
śakuna
Śakuna
ādayaḥ
and others
śṛṇutānantaraṁ sarve
śṛṇuta
just hear
anantaram
after that
sarve
all
kriyatām āśu mā ciram
kriyatām
let it be done
āśu
quickly
mā
do not
ciram
delay.
O Dānavas and Daityas! O Dvimūrdha, Tryakṣa, Śambara and Śatabāhu! O Hayagrīva, Namuci, Pāka and Ilvala! O Vipracitti, Puloman, Śakuna and other demons! All of you, kindly hear me attentively and then act according to my words without delay.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Dānavas and Daityas! O Dvimūrdha, Tryakṣa, Śambara and Śatabāhu ! O Hayagrīva, Namuci, Pāka and Ilvala! O Vipracitti, Puloman, Śakuna and other demons! All of you, please hear me and then act without delay.
Hiraṇyakaśipu addresses each demon by name, organizing them for action. Even destructive movements depend on careful coordination. Whenever a group is mobilized, ask who is being named, what is being asked, and toward what end.
Reflection Questions
  • What movements are you part of — and have you examined their actual aims?
  • Whose call to action are you answering without scrutiny?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.6

↗
सपत्नैर्घातित: क्षुद्रैर्भ्राता मे दयित: सुहृत् । पार्ष्णिग्राहेण हरिणा समेनाप्युपधावनै: ॥ ६ ॥
sapatnair ghātitaḥ kṣudrair
[sapatnair ghaatitah kshudrair]
bhrātā me dayitaḥ suhṛt
[bhraataa me dayitah suhrit]
pārṣṇi-grāheṇa hariṇā
[paarshni-graahena harinaa]
samenāpy upadhāvanaiḥ
[samenaapy upadhaavanaih]
sapatnaiḥ — by the enemies* ghātitaḥ — killed kṣudraiḥ — insignificant in power bhrātā — brother me — my dayitaḥ — very dear suhṛt — well-wisher pārṣṇi-grāheṇa — attacking from the rear hariṇā — by the Supreme Personality of Godhead samena — equal to everyone (both the demigods and demons) api — although upadhāvanaiḥ — by the worshipers, the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sapatnair ghātitaḥ kṣudrair
sapatnaiḥ
by the enemies*
ghātitaḥ
killed
kṣudraiḥ
insignificant in power
bhrātā me dayitaḥ suhṛt
bhrātā
brother
me
my
dayitaḥ
very dear
suhṛt
well-wisher
pārṣṇi-grāheṇa hariṇā
pārṣṇi-grāheṇa
attacking from the rear
hariṇā
by the Supreme Personality of Godhead
samenāpy upadhāvanaiḥ
samena
equal to everyone (both the demigods and demons)
api
although
upadhāvanaiḥ
by the worshipers, the demigods.
My insignificant enemies the demigods have combined to kill my very dear and obedient well-wisher, my brother Hiraṇyākṣa. Although the Supreme Lord, Viṣṇu, is always equal to both of us — namely, the demigods and the demons — this time, being devoutly worshiped by the demigods, He has taken their side and helped them kill Hiraṇyākṣa.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (9.29) , samo ’haṁ sarva-bhūteṣu: the Lord is equal to all living entities. Since the demigods and demons are both living entities, how is it possible that the Lord was partial to one class of living beings and opposed to another? Actually it is not possible for the Lord to be partial. Nonetheless, since the demigods, the devotees, always strictly follow the Supreme Lord’s orders, because of sincerity they are victorious over the demons, who know that the Supreme Lord is Viṣṇu but do not follow His instructions. Because of constantly remembering the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, the demons generally attain sāyujya-mukti after death. The demon Hiraṇyakaśipu accused the Lord of being partial because the demigods worshiped Him, but in fact the Lord, like the government, is not partial at all. The government is not partial to any citizen, but if a citizen is law-abiding he receives abundant opportunities from the state laws to live peacefully and fulfill his real interests.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My insignificant enemies, the devatās, joined with Viṣṇu, supposedly neutral, to kill my very dear friend and brother Hiraṇyākṣa. Though Viṣṇu is equal to all, he has sided with the devatās out of greed, because of their worship (upadhāvanaiḥ).
Hiraṇyakaśipu accuses Viṣṇu of partiality — but the Lord helps the demigods because they follow His instructions. The 'partiality' we see in life is often our own refusal to align with what is being asked of us. God responds to sincerity, not flattery.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you blame God for partiality when you are simply not following the instructions?
  • What single instruction from scripture could you align with this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.7-8

↗
तस्य त्यक्तस्वभावस्य घृणेर्मायावनौकस: । भजन्तं भजमानस्य बालस्येवास्थिरात्मन: ॥ ७ ॥ मच्छूलभिन्नग्रीवस्य भूरिणा रुधिरेण वै । असृक्प्रियं तर्पयिष्ये भ्रातरं मे गतव्यथ: ॥ ८ ॥
tasya tyakta-svabhāvasya
[tasya tyakta-svabhaavasya]
ghṛṇer māyā-vanaukasaḥ
[ghriner maayaa-vanaukasah]
bhajantaṁ bhajamānasya
[bhajantam bhajamaanasya]
bālasyevāsthirātmanaḥ
[baalasyevaasthiraatmanah]
mac-chūla-bhinna-grīvasya
[mach-choola-bhinna-greevasya]
bhūriṇā rudhireṇa vai
[bhoorinaa rudhirena vai]
asṛk-priyaṁ tarpayiṣye
[asrik-priyam tarpayishye]
bhrātaraṁ me gata-vyathaḥ
[bhraataram me gata-vyathah]
tasya — of Him (the Supreme Personality of Godhead) tyakta-svabhāvasya — who has given up His natural position (of being equal to everyone) ghṛṇeḥ — most abominable māyā — under the influence of the illusory energy vana-okasaḥ — behaving exactly like an animal in the jungle bhajantam — unto the devotee engaged in devotional service bhajamānasya — being worshiped bālasya — a child iva — like asthira-ātmanaḥ — who is always restless and changing mat — my śūla — by the trident bhinna — separated grīvasya — whose neck bhūriṇā — profuse rudhireṇa — by blood vai — indeed asṛk-priyam — who was fond of blood tarpayiṣye — I shall please bhrātaram — brother me — my gata-vyathaḥ — becoming peaceful myself.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya tyakta-svabhāvasya
tasya
of Him (the Supreme Personality of Godhead)
tyakta-svabhāvasya
who has given up His natural position (of being equal to everyone)
ghṛṇer māyā-vanaukasaḥ
ghṛṇeḥ
most abominable
māyā
under the influence of the illusory energy
vana-okasaḥ
behaving exactly like an animal in the jungle
bhajantaṁ bhajamānasya
bhajantam
unto the devotee engaged in devotional service
bhajamānasya
being worshiped
bālasyevāsthirātmanaḥ
bālasya
a child
mac-chūla-bhinna-grīvasya
iva
like
asthira-ātmanaḥ
who is always restless and changing
mat
my
śūla
by the trident
bhūriṇā rudhireṇa vai
bhinna
separated
grīvasya
whose neck
asṛk-priyaṁ tarpayiṣye
bhrātaraṁ me gata-vyathaḥ
bhūriṇā
profuse
rudhireṇa
by blood
vai
indeed
asṛk-priyam
who was fond of blood
tarpayiṣye
I shall please
bhrātaram
brother
me
my
gata-vyathaḥ
becoming peaceful myself.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead has given up His natural tendency of equality toward the demons and demigods. Although He is the Supreme Person, now, influenced by māyā, He has assumed the form of a boar to please His devotees, the demigods, just as a restless child leans toward someone. I shall therefore sever Lord Viṣṇu’s head from His trunk by my trident, and with the profuse blood from His body I shall please my brother Hiraṇyākṣa, who was so fond of sucking blood. Thus shall I too be peaceful.

The defect of the demoniac mentality is expressed in this verse very clearly. Hiraṇyakaśipu thought that Viṣṇu also becomes partial, like a child whose mind is not steady or resolute. The Lord can change His mind at any time, Hiraṇyakaśipu thought, and therefore His words and activities are like those of children. Actually, because the demons are ordinary human beings, their minds change, and being materially conditioned, they think that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is conditioned also. As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) , avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam: “Fools deride Me when I descend in a human form.”

Demons always think that Viṣṇu can be killed. Therefore, being absorbed in thoughts of Viṣṇu’s form to kill Him, at least they have the opportunity to think of Viṣṇu unfavorably. Although they are not devotees, their thinking of Viṣṇu is effective, and thus they generally attain sāyujya-mukti. Because the demons consider the Supreme Lord an ordinary living being, they think that they can kill Lord Viṣṇu as one might kill an ordinary person. Another fact disclosed herein is that demons are very much fond of sucking blood. Indeed, all of them are meat-eaters and bloodsuckers.

Hiraṇyakaśipu accused the Supreme Lord of having a restless mind like that of a small child who can be induced to do anything if simply offered some cakes and lāḍḍus. Indirectly, this indicates the true position of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who says in Bhagavad-gītā (9.26) :

patraṁ puṣpaṁ phalaṁ toyaṁ yo me bhaktyā prayacchati tad ahaṁ bhakty-upahṛtam aśnāmi prayatātmanaḥ

“If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water, I will accept it.” The Lord accepts the offerings of devotees because of their transcendental love. Because they are in love with the Supreme Lord, they do not eat anything without offering it first to the Lord. The Lord does not hanker for a small leaf or flower; He has enough to eat. Indeed, He is feeding all living entities. Nonetheless, because He is very merciful and is bhakta-vatsala, very favorable to the devotees, He certainly eats whatever they offer Him with love and devotion. This quality should not be misjudged to be childish. The highest quality of the Supreme Lord is that He is bhakta-vatsala; in other words, He is always extremely pleased with His devotees. As for the word māyā, when used in reference to the dealings of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and His devotees, this word means “affection.” The actions of the Lord to favor His devotees are not disqualifications but signs of His natural affection.

As for rudhira, or the blood of Lord Viṣṇu, since there is no possibility of severing Lord Viṣṇu’s head from His body, there is no question of blood. But the garland that decorates Viṣṇu’s body is as red as blood. When the demons achieve sāyujya-mukti and leave behind their sinful activities, they are blessed by Viṣṇu’s garland, which is red like blood. After attaining sāyujya-mukti, the demons are sometimes promoted to the Vaikuṇṭha world, where they receive the reward of the Lord’s garland prasāda.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Viṣṇu has given up his neutral nature. Though he was shining, he is now an animal under the control of māyā. He has accepted the nature of an ordinary person and acts unsteadily like a small child. Relieving my pain, I will satisfy my brother who was fond of blood, with the profuse blood from the neck of Viṣṇu severed by my trident. If you think you should also worship Viṣṇu, please do not say that. You should remain and work for me. I will kill him all alone. This is expressed in two verses. “But the scriptures say the Viṣṇu is supreme. Why then do you want to kill him?” He is famous as Paramātmā for being equal, but he has given up his neutrality. If he has given up that position, then what is his position as Paramātmā now? Rather, he has given up that position and is now simply an animal. He who was shining (ghṛṇeḥ) previously is now an animal (Matsya, Kūrma) under the control of māyā. He has become an ordinary person (bhajantam), and is restless like a child controlled by sweets. The words also have the opposite meaning. Actually out of affection for his devotees he gives up his neutrality, takes the form of avatāras, shines, becomes like an ordinary person, and is restless like a child. These are his ornaments, not faults. Ghṛṇeḥ means “having pure effulgence.” Māyā means “by his mercy he accepts different forms.” Mac-chūla-bhinna-grīvasya also means “My trident will break into pieces on his neck, since my material trident cannot enter his body.” I will satisfy my brother with the kuṅkuma coming from the body of Viṣṇu. Rudhira can mean kuṅkuma according to the dictionary.
Hiraṇyakaśipu imagines he can behead Viṣṇu with his trident and please his brother with blood. The demoniac mind projects its own conditioned nature onto the Supreme — fickle, killable, vengeful. We always see God through the lens of who we are.
Reflection Questions
  • What features of your own conditioning are you projecting onto God right now?
  • If you could see God free of your projections, what would change in your prayer?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.9

↗
तस्मिन् कूटेऽहिते नष्टे कृत्तमूले वनस्पतौ । विटपा इव शुष्यन्ति विष्णुप्राणा दिवौकस: ॥ ९ ॥
tasmin kūṭe ’hite naṣṭe
[tasmin koote ’hite nashte]
kṛtta-mūle vanas-patau
[kritta-moole vanas-patau]
viṭapā iva śuṣyanti
[vitapaa iva shushyanti]
viṣṇu-prāṇā divaukasaḥ
[vishnu-praanaa divaukasah]
tasmin — when He kūṭe — the most deceitful ahite — enemy naṣṭe — is finished kṛtta-mūle — having its roots cut off vanas-patau — a tree viṭapāḥ — the branches and leaves iva — like śuṣyanti — dry up viṣṇu-prāṇāḥ — whose life is Lord Viṣṇu diva-okasaḥ — the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmin kūṭe ’hite naṣṭe
tasmin
when He
kūṭe
the most deceitful
kṛtta-mūle vanas-patau
viṭapā iva śuṣyanti
viṣṇu-prāṇā divaukasaḥ
ahite
enemy
naṣṭe
is finished
kṛtta-mūle
having its roots cut off
vanas-patau
a tree
viṭapāḥ
the branches and leaves
iva
like
śuṣyanti
dry up
viṣṇu-prāṇāḥ
whose life is Lord Viṣṇu
diva-okasaḥ
the demigods.
When the root of a tree is cut and the tree falls down, its branches and twigs automatically dry up. Similarly, when I have killed this diplomatic Viṣṇu, the demigods, for whom Lord Viṣṇu is the life and soul, will lose the source of their life and wither away.

The difference between the demigods and the demons is here explained. The demigods always follow the instructions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, whereas the demons simply plan to disturb or kill Him. Nevertheless, sometimes the demons very much appreciate the full dependence of the demigods upon the mercy of the Lord. This is indirect glorification of the demigods by the demons.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devatās, whose life is Viṣṇu, will wither away when cheating Viṣṇu is dead, just as branches wither away when the root is cut. Kūṭe ahite means “Viṣṇu having deceptive actions.” But it also means “Viṣṇu who fights against cheaters like me.” Thus this is my good fortune. There is also good fortune for the devatās. They live only for Viṣṇu. Nāsṭe can also mean that Viṣṇu becomes invisible, since he cannot be destroyed. When he disappears from their sight, just as a tree dries up when the root is cut, so the devatās, whose life is Viṣṇu, will dry up, out of separation. The devatās are fortunate, having Viṣṇu as their very life.
Hiraṇyakaśipu reasons that if he can kill Viṣṇu, the demigods will wither like a felled tree. Demons sometimes unintentionally glorify the demigods by recognizing their full dependence on the Lord. Even enemies confirm where the real strength lies.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose attack on what you love accidentally confirmed its value?
  • On what 'root' does your whole life depend — and do you tend to it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.10

↗
तावद्यात भुवं यूयं ब्रह्मक्षत्रसमेधिताम् । सूदयध्वं तपोयज्ञस्वाध्यायव्रतदानिन: ॥ १० ॥
tāvad yāta bhuvaṁ yūyaṁ
[taavad yaata bhuvam yooyam]
brahma-kṣatra-samedhitām
[brahma-kshatra-samedhitaam]
sūdayadhvaṁ tapo-yajña-
[soodayadhvam tapo-yajna-]
svādhyāya-vrata-dāninaḥ
[svaadhyaaya-vrata-daaninah]
tāvat — as long as (I am engaged in the matter of killing Viṣṇu) yāta — go bhuvam — to the planet earth yūyam — all of you brahma-kṣatra — of the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas samedhitām — made prosperous by the activities (brahminical culture and Vedic government) sūdayadhvam — just destroy tapaḥ — the performers of austerities yajña — sacrifices svādhyāya — study of Vedic knowledge vrata — the regulative vows dāninaḥ — and those giving charity.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāvad yāta bhuvaṁ yūyaṁ
tāvat
as long as (I am engaged in the matter of killing Viṣṇu)
yāta
go
bhuvam
to the planet earth
yūyam
all of you
brahma-kṣatra-samedhitām
brahma-kṣatra
of the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas
samedhitām
made prosperous by the activities (brahminical culture and Vedic government)
sūdayadhvaṁ tapo-yajña-
sūdayadhvam
just destroy
tapaḥ
the performers of austerities
yajña
sacrifices
svādhyāya-vrata-dāninaḥ
svādhyāya
study of Vedic knowledge
vrata
the regulative vows
dāninaḥ
and those giving charity.
While I am engaged in the business of killing Lord Viṣṇu, go down to the planet earth, which is flourishing due to brahminical culture and a kṣatriya government. These people engage in austerity, sacrifice, Vedic study, regulative vows, and charity. Destroy all the people thus engaged!

Hiraṇyakaśipu’s main purpose was to disturb the demigods. He planned first to kill Lord Viṣṇu so that with Lord Viṣṇu’s death the demigods would automatically weaken and die. Another of his plans was to disturb the residents of the planet earth. The peace and prosperity of the residents of earth, and all the other planets, were maintained by the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas. The Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (4.13) , cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ: “According to the three modes of material nature and the work ascribed to them, the four divisions of human society were created by Me.” On all the planets there are different types of residents, but the Lord recommends, referring especially to the planet earth, which is inhabited by human beings, that society be divided into four varṇas — brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya, vaiśya and śūdra. Before the advent of Lord Kṛṣṇa on this earth, it is understood that the earth was managed by the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas. The duty of the brāhmaṇas is to cultivate śamaḥ (peacefulness), damaḥ (self-control), titikṣā (tolerance), satyam (truthfulness), śaucam (cleanliness) and ārjavam (simplicity), and then to advise the kṣatriya kings how to rule the country or planet. Following the instructions of the brāhmaṇas, the kṣatriyas should engage the populace in austerity, sacrifices, Vedic study and adherence to the rules and regulations established by Vedic principles. They should also arrange for charity to be given to the brāhmaṇas, sannyāsīs and temples. This is the godly arrangement of brahminical culture.

People are inclined to offer yajña because unless sacrifices are offered there will be insufficient rain ( yajñād bhavati parjanyaḥ ), which will hamper agricultural activities ( parjanyād anna-sambhavaḥ ). By introducing brahminical culture, therefore, a kṣatriya government should engage people in performing yajña, studying the Vedas and giving charity. Thus the people will receive their necessities for life very easily, and there will be no disturbances in society. In this regard, Lord Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (3.12) :

iṣṭān bhogān hi vo devā dāsyante yajña-bhāvitāḥ tair dattān apradāyaibhyo yo bhuṅkte stena eva saḥ

“In charge of the various necessities of life, the demigods, being satisfied by the performance of yajña [sacrifice], supply all necessities to man. But he who enjoys these gifts, without offering them to the demigods in return, is certainly a thief.”

The demigods are authorized supplying agents who act on behalf of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. Therefore, they must be satisfied by the performance of prescribed yajñas. In the Vedas, there are different kinds of yajñas prescribed for different kinds of demigods, but all are ultimately offered to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. For one who cannot understand what the Personality of Godhead is, sacrifice to the demigods is recommended. According to the different material qualities of the persons concerned, different types of yajñas are recommended in the Vedas. Worship of different demigods is also on the same basis — namely, according to different qualities. For example, the meat-eaters are recommended to worship the goddess Kālī, the ghastly form of material nature, and before the goddess the sacrifice of animals is recommended. But for those in the mode of goodness, the transcendental worship of Viṣṇu is recommended. Ultimately, all yajñas are meant for gradual promotion to the transcendental position. For ordinary men, at least five yajñas, known as pañca-mahāyajña, are necessary.

One should know, however, that all the necessities of life that human society requires are supplied by the demigod agents of the Lord. No one can manufacture anything. Consider, for example, all the eatables of human society. These eatables include grains, fruits, vegetables, milk and sugar for persons in the mode of goodness, and also eatables for the nonvegetarians, such as meats, none of which can be manufactured by men. Then again, take for example, heat, light, water and air, which are also necessities of life — none of them can be manufactured by human society. Without the Supreme Lord, there can be no profuse sunlight, moonlight, rainfall or breeze, without which no one can live. Obviously, our life is dependent on supplies from the Lord. Even for our manufacturing enterprises, we require so many raw materials like metal, sulphur, mercury, manganese and so many essentials — all of which are supplied by the agents of the Lord, with the purpose that we should make proper use of them to keep ourselves fit and healthy for the purpose of self-realization, leading to the ultimate goal of life, namely, liberation from the material struggle for existence. This aim of life is attained by performance of yajñas. If we forget the purpose of human life and simply take supplies from the agents of the Lord for sense gratification and become more and more entangled in material existence, which is not the purpose of creation, certainly we become thieves, and therefore we are punished by the laws of material nature. A society of thieves can never be happy, for they have no aim in life. The gross materialist thieves have no ultimate goal of life. They are simply directed to sense gratification; nor do they have knowledge of how to perform yajñas. Lord Caitanya, however, inaugurated the easiest performance of yajña, namely the saṅkīrtana-yajña, which can be performed by anyone in the world who accepts the principles of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

Hiraṇyakaśipu planned to kill the inhabitants of earth so that yajña would stop and the demigods, being disturbed, would die automatically when Lord Viṣṇu, the yajñeśvara, was killed. These were the demoniac plans of Hiraṇyakaśipu, who was expert in such activities.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While I am engaged in killing Lord Viṣṇu, go down to the planet earth, which is flourishing due to brāhmaṇas’ austerity and kṣatriya strength. Destroy all the people engaged in austerity, sacrifice, Vedic study, vows, and charity. Go to the earth flourishing because of austerity of brāhmaṇas and strength of kṣatriyas. Why? Destroy the performers of charity and vows.
Hiraṇyakaśipu orders his demons to attack earth's brahminical and kṣatriya culture — places of austerity, sacrifice, Vedic study, and charity. Demonic forces always target the institutions that sustain spiritual life. Protect the structures that produce saints.
Reflection Questions
  • Which spiritual institutions in your life are quietly under attack — and how are you supporting them?
  • What practices of austerity or study are you letting demonic distraction erode?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.11

↗
विष्णुर्द्विजक्रियामूलो यज्ञो धर्ममय: पुमान् । देवर्षिपितृभूतानां धर्मस्य च परायणम् ॥ ११ ॥
viṣṇur dvija-kriyā-mūlo
[vishnur dvija-kriyaa-moolo]
yajño dharmamayaḥ pumān
[yajno dharmamayah pumaan]
devarṣi-pitṛ-bhūtānāṁ
[devarshi-pitri-bhootaanaam]
dharmasya ca parāyaṇam
[dharmasya cha paraayanam]
viṣṇuḥ — Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead dvija — of the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas kriyā-mūlaḥ — whose root is the performance of yajña and the ritualistic ceremonies mentioned in the Vedas yajñaḥ — personified yajña (Lord Viṣṇu, who is known as the yajña-puruṣa) dharma-mayaḥ — full of religious principles pumān — the Supreme Person deva-ṛṣi — of the demigods and great ṛṣis like Vyāsadeva and Nārada pitṛ — of the forefathers bhūtānām — and of all other living entities dharmasya — of the religious principles ca — also parāyaṇam — the shelter.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣṇur dvija-kriyā-mūlo
viṣṇuḥ
Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead
dvija
of the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas
kriyā-mūlaḥ
whose root is the performance of yajña and the ritualistic ceremonies mentioned in the Vedas
yajño dharmamayaḥ pumān
yajñaḥ
personified yajña (Lord Viṣṇu, who is known as the yajña-puruṣa)
dharma-mayaḥ
full of religious principles
pumān
the Supreme Person
devarṣi-pitṛ-bhūtānāṁ
deva-ṛṣi
of the demigods and great ṛṣis like Vyāsadeva and Nārada
pitṛ
of the forefathers
bhūtānām
and of all other living entities
dharmasya ca parāyaṇam
dharmasya
of the religious principles
ca
also
parāyaṇam
the shelter.
The basic principle of brahminical culture is to satisfy Lord Viṣṇu, the personification of sacrificial and ritualistic ceremonies. Lord Viṣṇu is the personified reservoir of all religious principles, and He is the shelter of all the demigods, the great pitās, and the people in general. When the brāhmaṇas are killed, no one will exist to encourage the kṣatriyas to perform yajñas, and thus the demigods, not being appeased by yajña, will automatically die.

Since Viṣṇu is the central point of brahminical culture, Hiraṇyakaśipu’s plan was to kill Viṣṇu, for if Viṣṇu were killed, naturally the brahminical culture would also be lost. With brahminical culture lost, yajña would no longer be performed, and for want of yajña the regular distribution of rainfall would cease ( yajñād bhavati parjanyaḥ ). Thus there would be disturbances all over the world, and naturally the demigods would be defeated. From this verse we get a clear indication of how human society is disturbed when the Vedic Āryan civilization is killed and the Vedic ritualistic ceremonies performed by the brāhmaṇas are stopped. Kalau śūdra-sambhavaḥ: because the population of the modern world consists mostly of śūdras, the brahminical culture is now lost and is extremely difficult to reestablish in a proper way. Therefore Lord Caitanya has recommended the chanting of the holy name of the Lord, which will revive brahminical culture very easily.

harer nāma harer nāma harer nāmaiva kevalam kalau nāsty eva nāsty eva nāsty eva gatir anyathā

Because of the increment in demoniac population, people have lost brahminical culture. Nor is there a kṣatriya government. Instead, the government is a democracy in which any śūdra can be voted into taking up the governmental reigns and capture the power to rule. Because of the poisonous effects of Kali-yuga, the śāstra ( Bhāg. 12.2.13) says, dasyu-prāyeṣu rājasu: the government will adopt the policies of dasyus, or plunderers. Thus there will be no instructions from the brāhmaṇas, and even if there are brahminical instructions, there will be no kṣatriya rulers who can follow them. Aside from Satya-yuga, even formerly, in the days when demons were flourishing, Hiraṇyakaśipu planned to destroy the brahminical culture and the kṣatriya government and thus create chaos all over the world. Although in Satya-yuga this plan was very difficult to execute, in Kali-yuga, which is full of śūdras and demons, the brahminical culture is lost and can be revived only by the chanting of the mahā-mantra. Therefore the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, or the Hare Kṛṣṇa movement, has been inaugurated to revive brahminical culture very easily so that people may become happy and peaceful in this life and prepare for elevation in the next. In this regard, Śrīla Madhvācārya quotes this verse from the Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa:

vipra-yajñādi-mūlaṁ tu harir ity āsuraṁ matam harir eva hi sarvasya mūlaṁ samyaṅ mato nṛpa

“O King, the demons think that Hari, Lord Viṣṇu, exists because of the brāhmaṇas and yajña, but factually Hari is the cause of everything including the brāhmaṇas and yajña. ” Therefore, through the popularizing of hari-kīrtana, or the saṅkīrtana movement, the brahminical culture and kṣatriya government will automatically come back, and people will be extremely happy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Viṣṇu has his roots in the activities of the brāhmaṇas. He is sacrifice, the embodiment of dharma, the shelter of dharma, and the shelter of the devatās, sages, Pitṛs and all beings. When the brāhmaṇas are destroyed, Viṣṇu himself will be destroyed. When the brāhmaṇas are destroyed, their actions will stop. Thus the root of Viṣṇu will be destroyed. With destruction of sacrifice and dharma, Viṣṇu’s form will be destroyed. He is the supreme shelter of the devatās and sages. With the destruction of the devatās, he will die, out of lamentation.
Related verses
Brahminical culture's goal is to satisfy Viṣṇu through yajña; when brāhmaṇas are killed, sacrifice ceases, and even the demigods die. A society without spiritual specialists eventually collapses at every level. Honor those whose lives are devoted to remembrance.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose life of devotion is quietly holding up the wider world you live in?
  • How do you support the priests, teachers, and renunciants of your tradition?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.12

↗
यत्र यत्र द्विजा गावो वेदा वर्णाश्रमक्रिया: । तं तं जनपदं यात सन्दीपयत वृश्चत ॥ १२ ॥
yatra yatra dvijā gāvo
[yatra yatra dvijaa gaavo]
vedā varṇāśrama-kriyāḥ
[vedaa varnaashrama-kriyaah]
taṁ taṁ janapadaṁ yāta
[tam tam janapadam yaata]
sandīpayata vṛścata
[sandeepayata vrishchata]
yatra yatra — wherever dvijāḥ — the brāhmaṇas gāvaḥ — the protected cows vedāḥ — the Vedic culture varṇa-āśrama — of the Āryan civilization of four varṇas and four āśramas kriyāḥ — the activities tam tam — that jana-padam — to the city or town yāta — go sandīpayata — set fire vṛścata — cut down (all the trees).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yatra yatra dvijā gāvo
yatra yatra
wherever
dvijāḥ
the brāhmaṇas
gāvaḥ
the protected cows
vedā varṇāśrama-kriyāḥ
vedāḥ
the Vedic culture
varṇa-āśrama
of the Āryan civilization of four varṇas and four āśramas
kriyāḥ
the activities
taṁ taṁ janapadaṁ yāta
tam tam
that
jana-padam
to the city or town
yāta
go
sandīpayata vṛścata
sandīpayata
set fire
vṛścata
cut down (all the trees).
Immediately go wherever there is good protection for the cows and brāhmaṇas and wherever the Vedas are studied in terms of the varṇāśrama principles. Set fire to those places and cut from the roots the trees there, which are the source of life.

The picture of a proper human civilization is indirectly described here. In a perfect human civilization there must be a class of men fully trained as perfect brāhmaṇas. Similarly, there must be kṣatriyas to rule the country very nicely according to the injunctions of the śāstras, and there must be vaiśyas who can protect the cows. The word gāvaḥ indicates that cows should be given protection. Because the Vedic civilization is lost, cows are not protected, but instead indiscriminately killed in slaughterhouses. Such are the acts of demons. Therefore this is a demoniac civilization. The varṇāśrama-dharma mentioned here is essential for human civilization. Unless there is a brāhmaṇa to guide, a kṣatriya to rule perfectly, and a perfect vaiśya to produce food and protect the cows, how will people live peacefully? It is impossible.

Another point is that trees also should be given protection. During its lifetime, a tree should not be cut for industrial enterprises. In Kali-yuga, trees are indiscriminately and unnecessarily cut for industry, in particular for paper mills that manufacture a profuse quantity of paper for the publication of demoniac propaganda, nonsensical literature, huge quantities of newspapers and many other paper products. This is a sign of a demoniac civilization. The cutting of trees is prohibited unless necessary for the service of Lord Viṣṇu. Yajñārthāt karmaṇo ’nyatra loko’yaṁ karma-bandhanaḥ: “Work done as a sacrifice for Lord Viṣṇu must be performed, otherwise work binds one to this material world.” But if the paper mills stop producing paper, one may argue, how can our ISKCON literature be published? The answer is that the paper mills should manufacture paper only for the publication of ISKCON literature because ISKCON literature is published for the service of Lord Viṣṇu. This literature clarifies our relationship with Lord Viṣṇu, and therefore the publication of ISKCON literature is the performance of yajña. Yajñārthāt karmaṇo ’nyatra loko ’yaṁ karma-bandhanaḥ. Yajña must be performed, as indicated by the superior authorities. The cutting of trees simply to manufacture paper for the publication of unwanted literature is the greatest sinful act.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Go wherever there are cows and brāhmaṇas, study of the Vedas, and activities of varṇāśrama. Burn the cities and cut down the trees. Sandīpayata means “burn.” If the cities are burned, then the inhabitants will be burned also. Cut down the trees upon which they live.
Hiraṇyakaśipu targets cows, brāhmaṇas, and Vedic places — burning forests and cutting trees by the roots. Demonic civilization attacks the gentle, the contemplative, and the natural together. A culture that cannot protect cows and saints is in trouble.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is the gentle and contemplative being burned down in your own life by demands for productivity?
  • What 'tree at the root' supplies your spiritual nourishment — and how protected is it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.13

↗
इति ते भर्तृनिर्देशमादाय शिरसाद‍ृता: । तथा प्रजानां कदनं विदधु: कदनप्रिया: ॥ १३ ॥
iti te bhartṛ-nirdeśam
[iti te bhartri-nirdesham]
ādāya śirasādṛtāḥ
[aadaaya shirasaadritaah]
tathā prajānāṁ kadanaṁ
[tathaa prajaanaam kadanam]
vidadhuḥ kadana-priyāḥ
[vidadhuh kadana-priyaah]
iti — thus te — they bhartṛ — of the master nirdeśam — the direction ādāya — receiving śirasā — with their heads ādṛtāḥ — respecting tathā — so also prajānām — of all the citizens kadanam — persecution vidadhuḥ — executed kadana-priyāḥ — who are expert in persecuting others.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti te bhartṛ-nirdeśam
iti
thus
te
they
bhartṛ
of the master
nirdeśam
the direction
ādāya śirasādṛtāḥ
ādāya
receiving
śirasā
with their heads
ādṛtāḥ
respecting
tathā prajānāṁ kadanaṁ
tathā
so also
prajānām
of all the citizens
kadanam
persecution
vidadhuḥ kadana-priyāḥ
vidadhuḥ
executed
kadana-priyāḥ
who are expert in persecuting others.
Thus the demons, being fond of disastrous activities, took Hiraṇyakaśipu’s instructions on their heads with great respect and offered him obeisances. According to his directions, they engaged in envious activities directed against all living beings.

The followers of demoniac principles, as described here, are thoroughly envious of the general populace. In the present day, scientific advancement exemplifies such envy. The discovery of nuclear energy has been disastrous to people in general because demons all over the world are manufacturing nuclear weapons. The word kadana-priyāḥ is very significant in this regard. The demoniac persons who want to kill the Vedic culture are extremely envious of the feeble citizens, and they act in such a way that ultimately their discoveries will be inauspicious for everyone ( jagato ’hitāḥ ). The Sixteenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā fully explains how the demons engage in sinful activities for the destruction of the populace.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus the demons, being fond of evil, took Hiraṇyakaśipu's instructions on their heads with great respect and began persecuting the citizens. Kadanam means difficulties.
The demons receive Hiraṇyakaśipu's orders with reverence and go forth envious of all beings. Modern parallels include weapons of mass destruction — discoveries celebrated as progress that ultimately harm everyone. Watch which 'advances' are really envy in disguise.
Reflection Questions
  • Which celebrated innovation in your field is quietly born of envy or fear?
  • What would 'progress' that benefits all beings actually look like in your work?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.14

↗
पुरग्रामव्रजोद्यानक्षेत्रारामाश्रमाकरान् । खेटखर्वटघोषांश्च ददहु: पत्तनानि च ॥ १४ ॥
pura-grāma-vrajodyāna-
[pura-graama-vrajodyaana-]
kṣetrārāmāśramākarān
[kshetraaraamaashramaakaraan]
kheṭa-kharvaṭa-ghoṣāṁś ca
[kheta-kharvata-ghoshaamsh cha]
dadahuḥ pattanāni ca
[dadahuh pattanaani cha]
pura — cities and towns grāma — villages vraja — pasturing grounds udyāna — gardens kṣetra — agricultural fields ārāma — natural forests āśrama — hermitages of saintly persons ākarān — and mines (that produce valuable metals to maintain brahminical culture) kheṭa — farm villages kharvaṭa — mountain villages ghoṣān — the little villages of cowherds ca — and dadahuḥ — they burned pattanāni — the capitals ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pura-grāma-vrajodyāna-
pura
cities and towns
grāma
villages
vraja
pasturing grounds
udyāna
gardens
kṣetrārāmāśramākarān
kṣetra
agricultural fields
ārāma
natural forests
āśrama
hermitages of saintly persons
ākarān
and mines (that produce valuable metals to maintain brahminical culture)
kheṭa-kharvaṭa-ghoṣāṁś ca
kheṭa
farm villages
kharvaṭa
mountain villages
ghoṣān
the little villages of cowherds
ca
and
dadahuḥ pattanāni ca
dadahuḥ
they burned
pattanāni
the capitals
ca
also.
The demons set fire to the cities, villages, pasturing grounds, cowpens, gardens, agricultural fields and natural forests. They burned the hermitages of the saintly persons, the important mines that produced valuable metals, the residential quarters of the agriculturalists, the mountain villages, and the villages of the cow protectors, the cowherd men. They also burned the government capitals.

The word udyāna refers to places where trees are especially grown to produce fruits and flowers, which are most important for human civilization. Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (9.26) :

patraṁ puṣpaṁ phalaṁ toyaṁ yo me bhaktyā prayacchati tad ahaṁ bhakty-upahṛtam aśnāmi prayatātmanaḥ

“If one offers Me with love and devotion a leaf, a flower, fruit or water, I will accept it.” Fruits and flowers are very much pleasing to the Lord. If one wants to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he can simply offer fruits and flowers, and the Lord will be pleased to accept them. Our only duty is to please the Supreme Godhead ( saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam ). Whatever we do and whatever our occupation, our main purpose should be to please the Supreme Lord. All the paraphernalia mentioned in this verse is especially meant for the satisfaction of the Lord, not the satisfaction of one’s senses. The government — indeed, the entire society — should be structured in such a way that everyone can be trained to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. But unfortunately, especially in this age, na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇum: people do not know that the highest goal of human life is to please Lord Viṣṇu. On the contrary, like demons, they simply plan to kill Viṣṇu and be happy by sense gratification.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The demons set fire to the cities, villages, pasturing grounds, flower gardens, agricultural fields, orchards, hermitages, mines, farm houses, the mountain villages, the villages of the cow herders, and the government capitals. Pura means towns with markets. Grāma means towns without markets. Vraja means places for cows. Udyāna means forest with lots of flowers. Kṣetra means fields of grains. Ārāma means forests with fruits. Āśrama means the houses of sages. Ākara means mines for jewels and minerals. Kheta means houses of farmers. Kharvaṭa means a village in a valley of a mountain. Ghoṣa is the house of a cowherd. Pattanam is a capital city.
The demons burn cities, villages, pastures, hermitages, gardens, fields, mines, and even government capitals — leaving nothing of culture standing. Destruction without discrimination is the signature of demonic energy. Build slowly; burn nothing in haste.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are you tempted to burn down what took years to build, in one moment of anger?
  • What 'hermitage' in your own life needs protection from the demon of impatience?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.15

↗
केचित्खनित्रैर्बिभिदु: सेतुप्राकारगोपुरान् । आजीव्यांश्चिच्छिदुर्वृक्षान् केचित्परशुपाणय: । प्रादहन् शरणान्येके प्रजानां ज्वलितोल्मुकै: ॥ १५ ॥
kecit khanitrair bibhiduḥ
[kechit khanitrair bibhiduh]
setu-prākāra-gopurān
[setu-praakaara-gopuraan]
ājīvyāṁś cicchidur vṛkṣān
[aajeevyaamsh chichchidur vrikshaan]
kecit paraśu-pāṇayaḥ
[kechit parashu-paanayah]
prādahaṣ śaraṇāny eke
[praadahash sharanaany eke]
prajānāṁ jvalitolmukaiḥ
[prajaanaam jvalitolmukaih]
kecit — some of the demons khanitraiḥ — with digging instruments bibhiduḥ — broke to pieces setu — bridges prākāra — protective walls gopurān — city gates ājīvyān — the source of livelihood cicchiduḥ — cut down vṛkṣān — trees kecit — some paraśu-pāṇayaḥ — taking axes in hand prādahan — burned down śaraṇāni — the dwellings eke — other demons prajānām — of the citizens jvalita — blazing ulmukaiḥ — with firebrands.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kecit khanitrair bibhiduḥ
kecit
some of the demons
khanitraiḥ
with digging instruments
bibhiduḥ
broke to pieces
setu-prākāra-gopurān
setu
bridges
prākāra
protective walls
gopurān
city gates
ājīvyāṁś cicchidur vṛkṣān
ājīvyān
the source of livelihood
cicchiduḥ
cut down
vṛkṣān
trees
kecit paraśu-pāṇayaḥ
kecit
some
paraśu-pāṇayaḥ
taking axes in hand
prādahaṣ śaraṇāny eke
prādahan
burned down
śaraṇāni
the dwellings
eke
other demons
prajānāṁ jvalitolmukaiḥ
prajānām
of the citizens
jvalita
blazing
ulmukaiḥ
with firebrands.
Some of the demons took digging instruments and broke down the bridges, the protective walls and the gates [gopuras] of the cities. Some took axes and began cutting the important trees that produced mango, jackfruit and other sources of food. Some of the demons took firebrands and set fire to the residential quarters of the citizens.

The cutting of trees is generally prohibited. In particular, trees that produce nice fruit for the maintenance of human society should not be cut. In different countries there are different types of fruit trees. In India the mango and jackfruit trees are prominent, and in other places there are mango trees, jackfruit trees, coconut trees and berry trees. Any tree that produces nice fruit for the maintenance of the people should not be cut at all. This is a śāstric injunction.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some of the demons took shovels and broke down the bridges, the protective walls and the gates of the cities. Some took axes and began cutting the trees that produced fruits. Some of the demons took firebrands and set fire to the residential quarters of the citizens.
Some demons break bridges and walls, others cut fruit-bearing trees like mango and jackfruit, others torch homes. Śāstra forbids cutting trees that feed people. A civilization is measured by what it refuses to destroy.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'fruit-bearing tree' are you tempted to cut down for short-term gain?
  • Where in your life are bridges and walls being broken that you should be repairing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.16

↗
एवं विप्रकृते लोके दैत्येन्द्रानुचरैर्मुहु: । दिवं देवा: परित्यज्य भुवि चेरुरलक्षिता: ॥ १६ ॥
evaṁ viprakṛte loke
[evam viprakrite loke]
daityendrānucarair muhuḥ
[daityendraanucharair muhuh]
divaṁ devāḥ parityajya
[divam devaah parityajya]
bhuvi cerur alakṣitāḥ
[bhuvi cherur alakshitaah]
evam — thus viprakṛte — being disturbed loke — when all the people daitya-indra-anucaraiḥ — by the followers of Hiraṇyakaśipu, the King of the Daityas muhuḥ — again and again divam — the heavenly planets devāḥ — the demigods parityajya — giving up bhuvi — on the planet earth ceruḥ — wandered (to see the extent of the disturbances) alakṣitāḥ — unseen by the demons.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ viprakṛte loke
evam
thus
viprakṛte
being disturbed
loke
when all the people
daityendrānucarair muhuḥ
daitya-indra-anucaraiḥ
by the followers of Hiraṇyakaśipu, the King of the Daityas
muhuḥ
again and again
divaṁ devāḥ parityajya
divam
the heavenly planets
devāḥ
the demigods
parityajya
giving up
bhuvi cerur alakṣitāḥ
bhuvi
on the planet earth
ceruḥ
wandered (to see the extent of the disturbances)
alakṣitāḥ
unseen by the demons.
Thus disturbed again and again by the unnatural occurrences caused by the followers of Hiraṇyakaśipu, all the people had to cease the activities of Vedic culture. Not receiving the results of yajña, the demigods also became disturbed. They left their residential quarters in the heavenly planets and, unobserved by the demons, began wandering on the planet earth to see the disasters.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, the performance of yajña brings reciprocal good fortune for both the human beings and the demigods. When the performances of yajña were stopped by the disturbances of the demons, the demigods were naturally bereft of the results of yajña and hampered in executing their respective duties. Therefore they came down to the planet earth to see how people had become disturbed and to consider what to do.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When all the people were disturbed repeatedly by the followers of Hiraṇyakaśipu, the devatās, not receiving the results of sacrifice, left the heavenly planets and, unobserved by the demons, began wandering the earth. When the people were disturbed, the devatās left heaven because of not receiving their share of sacrifice.
Vedic activity ceases under demonic disturbance, yajña stops, demigods receive no offerings, and they wander earth disguised to see the damage. When sacrifice stops, the unseen world also suffers — and the wise come quietly to assess.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'sacrifice' have you let lapse, and what unseen consequences are unfolding?
  • Where might wise observers be quietly assessing a situation you think no one is watching?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.17

↗
हिरण्यकशिपुर्भ्रातु: सम्परेतस्य दु:खित: । कृत्वा कटोदकादीनि भ्रातृपुत्रानसान्त्वयत् ॥ १७ ॥
hiraṇyakaśipur bhrātuḥ
[hiranyakashipur bhraatuh]
samparetasya duḥkhitaḥ
[samparetasya duhkhitah]
kṛtvā kaṭodakādīni
[kritvaa katodakaadeeni]
bhrātṛ-putrān asāntvayat
[bhraatri-putraan asaantvayat]
hiraṇyakaśipuḥ — Hiraṇyakaśipu bhrātuḥ — of the brother samparetasya — deceased duḥkhitaḥ — being very much distressed kṛtvā — performing kaṭodaka-ādīni — ceremonies observed after a death bhrātṛ-putrān — the sons of his brother asāntvayat — pacified.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hiraṇyakaśipur bhrātuḥ
hiraṇyakaśipuḥ
Hiraṇyakaśipu
bhrātuḥ
of the brother
samparetasya duḥkhitaḥ
samparetasya
deceased
duḥkhitaḥ
being very much distressed
kṛtvā kaṭodakādīni
kṛtvā
performing
kaṭodaka-ādīni
ceremonies observed after a death
bhrātṛ-putrān asāntvayat
bhrātṛ-putrān
the sons of his brother
asāntvayat
pacified.
After performing the ritualistic observances for the death of his brother, Hiraṇyakaśipu, being extremely unhappy, tried to pacify his nephews.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After performing the death rites of his brother, grieving Hiraṇyakaśipu consoled his nephews. Kaṭodakam means water given to the Pretas. The word ādi indicates the performance of preta-śrāddha rites as well.
After the funeral rites, Hiraṇyakaśipu — still grieving — tries to comfort his nephews. Even the demonic feel familial tenderness. The capacity to console others remains even in those most hardened by the world.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom have you written off as too hardened to feel real tenderness?
  • Where does your own anger coexist with care, and how do you honor both?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.18-19

↗
शकुनिं शम्बरं धृष्टिं भूतसन्तापनं वृकम् । कालनाभं महानाभं हरिश्मश्रुमथोत्कचम् ॥ १८ ॥ तन्मातरं रुषाभानुं दितिं च जननीं गिरा । श्लक्ष्णया देशकालज्ञ इदमाह जनेश्वर ॥ १९ ॥
śakuniṁ śambaraṁ dhṛṣṭiṁ
[shakunim shambaram dhrishtim]
bhūtasantāpanaṁ vṛkam
[bhootasantaapanam vrikam]
kālanābhaṁ mahānābhaṁ
[kaalanaabham mahaanaabham]
hariśmaśrum athotkacam
[harishmashrum athotkacham]
tan-mātaraṁ ruṣābhānuṁ
[tan-maataram rushaabhaanum]
ditiṁ ca jananīṁ girā
[ditim cha jananeem giraa]
ślakṣṇayā deśa-kāla-jña
[shlakshnayaa desha-kaala-jna]
idam āha janeśvara
[idam aaha janeshvara]
śakunim — Śakuni śambaram — Śambara dhṛṣṭim — Dhṛṣṭi bhūtasantāpanam — Bhūtasantāpana vṛkam — Vṛka kālanābham — Kālanābha mahānābham — Mahānābha hariśmaśrum — Hariśmaśru atha — as well as utkacam — Utkaca tat-mātaram — their mother ruṣābhānum — Ruṣābhānu ditim — Diti ca — and jananīm — his own mother girā — by words ślakṣṇayā — very sweet deśa-kāla-jñaḥ — who was expert in understanding the time and situation idam — this āha — said jana-īśvara — O King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śakuniṁ śambaraṁ dhṛṣṭiṁ
śakunim
Śakuni
śambaram
Śambara
dhṛṣṭim
Dhṛṣṭi
bhūtasantāpanaṁ vṛkam
bhūtasantāpanam
Bhūtasantāpana
vṛkam
Vṛka
kālanābhaṁ mahānābhaṁ
kālanābham
Kālanābha
mahānābham
Mahānābha
hariśmaśrum athotkacam
hariśmaśrum
Hariśmaśru
atha
as well as
utkacam
Utkaca
tan-mātaraṁ ruṣābhānuṁ
tat-mātaram
their mother
ruṣābhānum
Ruṣābhānu
ditiṁ ca jananīṁ girā
ditim
Diti
ca
and
jananīm
his own mother
girā
by words
ślakṣṇayā deśa-kāla-jña
ślakṣṇayā
very sweet
deśa-kāla-jñaḥ
who was expert in understanding the time and situation
idam āha janeśvara
idam
this
āha
said
jana-īśvara
O King.
O King, Hiraṇyakaśipu was extremely angry, but since he was a great politician, he knew how to act according to the time and situation. With sweet words he began pacifying his nephews, whose names were Śakuni, Śambara, Dhṛṣṭi, Bhūtasantāpana, Vṛka, Kālanābha, Mahānābha, Hariśmaśru and Utkaca. He also consoled their mother, his sister-in-law, Ruṣābhānu, as well as his own mother, Diti. He spoke to them all as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Hiraṇyakaśipu, judging time and place, with sweet words spoke to his nephews, whose names were Śakuni, Śambara, Dhṛṣṭi, Bhūtasantāpana, Vṛka, Kālanābha, Mahānābha, Hariśmaśru and Utkaca, and to their mother, Ruṣābhānu, and as well as to his own mother, Diti.
Furious yet politically shrewd, Hiraṇyakaśipu pacifies his nephews, sister-in-law, and mother with sweet words. The demonic can be eloquent and gentle when strategy demands it. Charm is not the same as character.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose charm in your life have you mistaken for character?
  • Where do you deploy sweet words to manage others instead of speaking honestly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.20

↗
श्रीहिरण्यकशिपुरुवाच अम्बाम्ब हे वधू: पुत्रा वीरं मार्हथ शोचितुम् । रिपोरभिमुखे श्लाघ्य: शूराणां वध ईप्सित: ॥ २० ॥
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipur uvāca
[shree-hiranyakashipur uvaacha]
ambāmba he vadhūḥ putrā
[ambaamba he vadhooh putraa]
vīraṁ mārhatha śocitum
[veeram maarhatha shochitum]
ripor abhimukhe ślāghyaḥ
[ripor abhimukhe shlaaghyah]
śūrāṇāṁ vadha īpsitaḥ
[shooraanaam vadha eepsitah]
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipuḥ uvāca — Hiraṇyakaśipu said amba amba — my mother, my mother he — O vadhūḥ — my sister-in-law putrāḥ — O sons of my brother vīram — the hero mā — not arhatha — you deserve śocitum — to lament about ripoḥ — of the enemy abhimukhe — in front ślāghyaḥ — glorious śūrāṇām — of those who are actually great vadhaḥ — killing īpsitaḥ — desired.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipur uvāca
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipuḥ uvāca
Hiraṇyakaśipu said
ambāmba he vadhūḥ putrā
amba amba
my mother, my mother
he
O
vadhūḥ
my sister-in-law
putrāḥ
O sons of my brother
vīraṁ mārhatha śocitum
vīram
the hero
mā
not
arhatha
you deserve
śocitum
to lament about
ripor abhimukhe ślāghyaḥ
ripoḥ
of the enemy
abhimukhe
in front
ślāghyaḥ
glorious
śūrāṇāṁ vadha īpsitaḥ
śūrāṇām
of those who are actually great
vadhaḥ
killing
īpsitaḥ
desired.
Hiraṇyakaśipu said: My dear mother, sister-in-law and nephews, you should not lament for the death of the great hero, for a hero’s death in front of his enemy is glorious and desirable.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hiraṇyakaśipu said: My dear mother, sister-in-law and nephews! You should not lament for the death of the great hero, for a hero's death in front of his enemy is glorious and desirable. Vadhūḥ means the wife of his brother.
Hiraṇyakaśipu tells the bereaved that a hero's death facing the enemy is glorious. Worldly codes of honor reframe death to make it bearable. Notice when 'glory' is being used to anesthetize real grief.
Reflection Questions
  • Which cultural script about a 'good death' are you using to avoid mourning?
  • What grief in your life would feel realer if you let go of its glorifying frame?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.21

↗
भूतानामिह संवास: प्रपायामिव सुव्रते । दैवेनैकत्र नीतानामुन्नीतानां स्वकर्मभि: ॥ २१ ॥
bhūtānām iha saṁvāsaḥ
[bhootaanaam iha samvaasah]
prapāyām iva suvrate
[prapaayaam iva suvrate]
daivenaikatra nītānām
[daivenaikatra neetaanaam]
unnītānāṁ sva-karmabhiḥ
[unneetaanaam sva-karmabhih]
bhūtānām — of all living entities iha — in this material world saṁvāsaḥ — the living together prapāyām — in a place for drinking cold water iva — like su-vrate — O my gentle mother daivena — by the superior arrangement ekatra — in one place nītānām — of those brought unnītānām — of those led apart sva-karmabhiḥ — by their own reactions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūtānām iha saṁvāsaḥ
bhūtānām
of all living entities
iha
in this material world
saṁvāsaḥ
the living together
prapāyām iva suvrate
prapāyām
in a place for drinking cold water
iva
like
su-vrate
O my gentle mother
daivenaikatra nītānām
daivena
by the superior arrangement
ekatra
in one place
nītānām
of those brought
unnītānāṁ sva-karmabhiḥ
unnītānām
of those led apart
sva-karmabhiḥ
by their own reactions.
My dear mother, in a restaurant or place for drinking cold water, many travelers are brought together, and after drinking water they continue to their respective destinations. Similarly, living entities join together in a family, and later, as a result of their own actions, they are led apart to their destinations.

prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ ahaṅkāra-vimūḍhātmā kartāham iti manyate

“The bewildered soul, under the influence of the three modes of material nature, thinks himself the doer of activities, which are in actuality carried out by nature.” ( Bg. 3.27 ) All living entities act exactly according to the directions of prakṛti, material nature, because in the material world we are fully under a higher control. All the living entities in this material world have come here only because they wanted to be equal to Kṛṣṇa in enjoyment and have thus been sent here to be conditioned by material nature in different degrees. In the material world a so-called family is a combination of several persons in one home to fulfill the terms of their imprisonment. As criminal prisoners scatter as soon as their terms are over and they are released, all of us who have temporarily assembled as family members will continue to our respective destinations. Another example given is that family members are like straws carried together by the waves of a river. Sometimes such straws mix together in whirlpools, and later, dispersed again by the same waves, they float alone in the water.

Although Hiraṇyakaśipu was a demon, he had Vedic knowledge and understanding. Thus the advice given to his family members — his sister-in-law, mother and nephews — was quite sound. The demons are considered highly elevated in knowledge, but because they do not use their good intelligence for the service of the Lord, they are called demons. The demigods, however, act very intelligently to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is confirmed in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.2.13) as follows:

ataḥ pumbhir dvija-śreṣṭhā varṇāśrama-vibhāgaśaḥ svanuṣṭhitasya dharmasya saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam

“O best among the twice-born, it is therefore concluded that the highest perfection one can achieve, by discharging his prescribed duties [ dharma ] according to caste divisions and orders of life, is to please the Lord Hari.” To become a demigod or to become godly, whatever one’s occupation, one must satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Persons are brought together to live in one place by karma and are taken away by karma, just as living entities gather at a watering hole and then depart. You should rid yourself of lamentation out of separation from relative. It is like living entities coming together at a drinking place and departing.
Related verses
Like travelers meeting at a roadside rest and then parting, families gather briefly and disperse according to karma. The intimacy you treasure is real but provisional. Hold those given to you well; do not pretend the meeting is permanent.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose company in your life are you taking as permanent that was always provisional?
  • How would you love your family today if you remembered the rest stop is brief?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.22

↗
नित्य आत्माव्यय: शुद्ध: सर्वग: सर्ववित्पर: । धत्तेऽसावात्मनो लिङ्गं मायया विसृजन्गुणान् ॥ २२ ॥
nitya ātmāvyayaḥ śuddhaḥ
[nitya aatmaavyayah shuddhah]
sarvagaḥ sarva-vit paraḥ
[sarvagah sarva-vit parah]
dhatte ’sāv ātmano liṅgaṁ
[dhatte ’saav aatmano lingam]
māyayā visṛjan guṇān
[maayayaa visrijan gunaan]
nityaḥ — eternal ātmā — spirit soul avyayaḥ — inexhaustible śuddhaḥ — with no material tinge sarva-gaḥ — qualified to go anywhere in the material or spiritual worlds sarva-vit — full of knowledge paraḥ — transcendental to material conditions dhatte — accepts asau — that ātmā, or living being ātmanaḥ — of the self liṅgam — a body māyayā — by the material energy visṛjan — creating guṇān — various material qualities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nitya ātmāvyayaḥ śuddhaḥ
nityaḥ
eternal
ātmā
spirit soul
avyayaḥ
inexhaustible
śuddhaḥ
with no material tinge
sarvagaḥ sarva-vit paraḥ
sarva-gaḥ
qualified to go anywhere in the material or spiritual worlds
sarva-vit
full of knowledge
paraḥ
transcendental to material conditions
dhatte ’sāv ātmano liṅgaṁ
dhatte
accepts
asau
that ātmā, or living being
ātmanaḥ
of the self
liṅgam
a body
māyayā visṛjan guṇān
māyayā
by the material energy
visṛjan
creating
guṇān
various material qualities.
The spirit soul, the living entity, has no death, for he is eternal and inexhaustible. Being free from material contamination, he can go anywhere in the material or spiritual worlds. He is fully aware and completely different from the material body, but because of being misled by misuse of his slight independence, he is obliged to accept subtle and gross bodies created by the material energy and thus be subjected to so-called material happiness and distress. Therefore, no one should lament for the passing of the spirit soul from the body.

Hiraṇyakaśipu very intelligently described the position of the soul. The soul is never the body, but is always completely different from the body. Being eternal and inexhaustible, the soul has no death, but when the same pure soul desires to enjoy the material world independently, he is placed under the conditions of material nature and must therefore accept a certain type of body and suffer the pains and pleasures thereof. This is also described by Kṛṣṇa in Bhagavad-gītā (13.22) . Kāraṇaṁ guṇa-saṅgo ’sya sad-asad-yoni janmasu: the living entity is born in different families or species of life because of being infected by the modes of material nature. When conditioned by material nature, the living entity must accept a certain type of body, which is offered by nature under the direction of the Supreme Lord.

īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe ’rjuna tiṣṭhati bhrāmayan sarva-bhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā

“The Supreme Lord is situated in everyone’s heart, O Arjuna, and is directing the wanderings of all living entities, who are seated as on a machine, made of the material energy.” ( Bg. 18.61 ) The body is just like a machine, and according to the living entity’s karma, he is offered a particular type of machine to move here and there under the control of material nature. This continues until he surrenders to the Supreme Personality of Godhead ( mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te ). Until he surrenders, the conditioned soul is carried from life to life by the arrangement of material nature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The ātmā is eternal, without decay, pure, capable of going to all planets, experiences life everywhere, and is different from the body. By its ignorance, the ātmā accepts for itself a subtle body, in order to accept and reject various gross bodies. I have said all this from the common man’s viewpoint to make you understand. You should also understand by philosophy that Hiraṇyākṣa is an ātmā, not a body. Hear about his real form as an ātmā. He is eternal, without death, without decay, without contamination, and all-pervading. All-pervasion is a quality of the Lord, but because of his demonic mentality, he applies this term to the jīva. But the jīva goes to all planets and therefore can be called sarvagaḥ. He knows everything about happiness and distress. He is different from the subtle body (paraḥ). This ātmā accepts this body by ignorance (māyayā). Why? He accepts the subtle body in order to accept gross bodies high or low (guṇān). And then he rejects these gross bodies. Viṣrjan has both meanings.
Related verses
The soul is eternal, indestructible, and free to roam — but misuse of free will lands it in subtle and gross bodies. So-called material happiness and distress arise from this misuse. Lament not for the soul's passage; examine your own use of free will.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is your free will currently buying you bondage you call freedom?
  • What recent loss would feel different if you remembered the lost one as a soul, not a body?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.23

↗
यथाम्भसा प्रचलता तरवोऽपि चला इव । चक्षुषा भ्राम्यमाणेन द‍ृश्यते चलतीव भू: ॥ २३ ॥
yathāmbhasā pracalatā
[yathaambhasaa prachalataa]
taravo ’pi calā iva
[taravo ’pi chalaa iva]
cakṣuṣā bhrāmyamāṇena
[chakshushaa bhraamyamaanena]
dṛśyate calatīva bhūḥ
[drishyate chalateeva bhooh]
yathā — just as ambhasā — by water pracalatā — moving taravaḥ — the trees (on the bank of the river) api — also calāḥ — moving iva — as if cakṣuṣā — by the eye bhrāmyamāṇena — moving dṛśyate — is seen calatī — moving iva — as if bhūḥ — the ground.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathāmbhasā pracalatā
yathā
just as
ambhasā
by water
pracalatā
moving
taravo ’pi calā iva
taravaḥ
the trees (on the bank of the river)
api
also
calāḥ
moving
iva
as if
cakṣuṣā bhrāmyamāṇena
cakṣuṣā
by the eye
bhrāmyamāṇena
moving
dṛśyate calatīva bhūḥ
dṛśyate
is seen
calatī
moving
iva
as if
bhūḥ
the ground.
Because of the movements of the water, the trees on the bank of a river, when reflected on the water, seem to move. Similarly, when the eyes move because of some mental derangement, the land appears to move also.

Sometimes, because of mental derangement, the land appears to be moving. A drunkard, for example, or a person with heart disease, sometimes feels that the land is moving. Similarly, the reflections of trees in a flowing river also appear to move. These are the actions of māyā. Actually the living entity does not move ( sthāṇur acalo ’yam ). The living entity does not take birth or accept death, but because of the transient subtle and gross bodies, the living entity appears to move from one place to another or be dead and gone forever. As the great Bengali Vaiṣṇava poet, Jagadānanda Paṇḍita, has said:

piśācī pāile yena mati-cchanna haya māyā-grasta jīvera haya se bhāva udaya

According to this statement from the Prema-vivarta, when a living entity is conditioned by material nature, he is exactly like a person haunted by a ghost. One should therefore understand the fixed position of the spirit soul and how he is carried away by the waves of material nature to different bodies and different situations under lamentation and hankering. One achieves the success of life when he understands the constitutional position of his self and is undisturbed by the conditions created by material nature ( prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of the movements of the water, the trees on the bank of a river, when reflected on the water, seem to move. Similarly, when the eyes move because of some mental derangement, the land appears to move. Since it accepts the subtle body, the ātmā is different from the subtle body. An example is given. The trees, reflected in water, seem to move because of moving water. The trees do no move, since they are different from the water. Similarly the qualities of the subtle body, lamentation and illusion, are falsely projected on the ātmā. Since the ātmā is different from the subtle body, lamentation and illusion do not belong to the ātmā. The attributes of the covering on the soul (subtle body) are projected on the ātmā. Having given that example, an example of the qualities of a sense being applied to the object perceived by the sense is given. Because of the rolling eye, the earth appears to move. The earth is caught by the defective eye, just like a man haunted by a ghost.
When water moves, reflected trees seem to move; when the mind is deranged, the land itself seems to shift. Much of what we perceive as 'happening to us' is mental disturbance projected outward. The soul itself does not actually go anywhere.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'change' in your life is really just movement in your own mind?
  • When you are calmed, what shifts in the landscape you thought was outside you?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.24

↗
एवं गुणैर्भ्राम्यमाणे मनस्यविकल: पुमान् । याति तत्साम्यतां भद्रे ह्यलिङ्गो लिङ्गवानिव ॥ २४ ॥
evaṁ guṇair bhrāmyamāṇe
[evam gunair bhraamyamaane]
manasy avikalaḥ pumān
[manasy avikalah pumaan]
yāti tat-sāmyatāṁ bhadre
[yaati tat-saamyataam bhadre]
hy aliṅgo liṅgavān iva
[hy alingo lingavaan iva]
evam — in this way guṇaiḥ — by the modes of material nature bhrāmyamāṇe — when shaken manasi — the mind avikalaḥ — changeless pumān — the living entity yāti — approaches tat-sāmyatām — the same condition of agitation as the mind bhadre — O my gentle mother hi — indeed aliṅgaḥ — without a subtle or gross body liṅga-vān — possessing a material body iva — as if.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ guṇair bhrāmyamāṇe
evam
in this way
guṇaiḥ
by the modes of material nature
bhrāmyamāṇe
when shaken
manasy avikalaḥ pumān
manasi
the mind
avikalaḥ
changeless
pumān
the living entity
yāti tat-sāmyatāṁ bhadre
yāti
approaches
tat-sāmyatām
the same condition of agitation as the mind
bhadre
O my gentle mother
hi
indeed
hy aliṅgo liṅgavān iva
aliṅgaḥ
without a subtle or gross body
liṅga-vān
possessing a material body
iva
as if.
In the same way, O my gentle mother, when the mind is agitated by the movements of the modes of material nature, the living entity, although freed from all the different phases of the subtle and gross bodies, thinks that he has changed from one condition to another.

As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (10.84.13) :

yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke sva-dhīḥ kalatrādiṣu bhauma-ijya-dhīḥ yat-tīrtha-buddhiḥ salile na karhicij janeṣv abhijñeṣu sa eva go-kharaḥ

“A human being who identifies the body made of three elements as the self, who considers the by-products of the body to be his kinsmen, who considers the land of his birth worshipable, and who goes to a place of pilgrimage simply to bathe rather than to meet men of transcendental knowledge there, is to be considered like a cow or an ass.” Although Hiraṇyakaśipu was a great demon, he was not as foolish as the population of the modern world. Hiraṇyakaśipu had clear knowledge of the spirit soul and the subtle and gross bodies, but now we are so degraded that everyone, including the exalted scientists, philosophers and other leaders, is under the bodily conception of life, which is condemned in the śāstras. Sa eva go-kharaḥ: such persons are nothing but cows and asses.

Hiraṇyakaśipu advised his family members that although the gross body of his brother Hiraṇyākṣa was dead and they were aggrieved because of this, they should not lament for the great soul of Hiraṇyākṣa, who had already attained his next destination. Ātmā, the spirit soul, is always unchanged ( avikalaḥ pumān ). We are spirit souls, but when carried away by mental activities ( manodharma ), we suffer from so-called material conditions of life. This generally happens to nondevotees. Harāv abhaktasya kuto mahad-guṇāḥ: nondevotees may possess exalted material qualities, but because they are foolish they have no good qualifications. The designations of the conditioned soul in the material world are decorations of the dead body. The conditioned soul has no information of the spirit and its exalted existence beyond the effects of the material condition.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O my gentle mother! When the mind is agitated by the movements of the guṇas, the living entity, although pure and not identical with the subtle body, takes on the qualities of the mind, as if he were the subtle body. The ātmā absorbed in the body, is controlled by the body, and is overcome by the qualities of the body. The ātmā is pure but becomes like the mind, accepting the qualities of the mind.
When the modes agitate the mind, the soul — though always free — imagines it is changing states. The transitions you mourn or celebrate are happening in the modes, not in your true self. Identifying with the unchanging witness ends the drama.
Reflection Questions
  • Which recent 'big change' in your life happened only in the modes and not in you?
  • What practice helps you sit with the unchanging witness behind the changing scene?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.25-26

↗
एष आत्मविपर्यासो ह्यलिङ्गे लिङ्गभावना । एष प्रियाप्रियैर्योगो वियोग: कर्मसंसृति: ॥ २५ ॥ सम्भवश्च विनाशश्च शोकश्च विविध: स्मृत: । अविवेकश्च चिन्ता च विवेकास्मृतिरेव च ॥ २६ ॥
eṣa ātma-viparyāso
[esha aatma-viparyaaso]
hy aliṅge liṅga-bhāvanā
[hy alinge linga-bhaavanaa]
eṣa priyāpriyair yogo
[esha priyaapriyair yogo]
viyogaḥ karma-saṁsṛtiḥ
[viyogah karma-samsritih]
sambhavaś ca vināśaś ca
[sambhavash cha vinaashash cha]
śokaś ca vividhaḥ smṛtaḥ
[shokash cha vividhah smritah]
avivekaś ca cintā ca
[avivekash cha chintaa cha]
vivekāsmṛtir eva ca
[vivekaasmritir eva cha]
eṣaḥ — this ātma-viparyāsaḥ — bewilderment of the living being hi — indeed aliṅge — in that which does not possess a material body liṅga-bhāvanā — accepting the material body to be the self eṣaḥ — this priya — with those who are very dear apriyaiḥ — and with those who are not dear (enemies, those not in the family, etc.) yogaḥ — connection viyogaḥ — separation karma — the fruits of action saṁsṛtiḥ — the material condition of life sambhavaḥ — accepting birth ca — and vināśaḥ — accepting death ca — and śokaḥ — lamentation ca — and vividhaḥ — varieties smṛtaḥ — mentioned in scripture avivekaḥ — lack of discrimination ca — and cintā — anxiety ca — also viveka — of proper discrimination asmṛtiḥ — forgetfulness eva — indeed ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣa ātma-viparyāso
eṣaḥ
this
ātma-viparyāsaḥ
bewilderment of the living being
hi
indeed
hy aliṅge liṅga-bhāvanā
aliṅge
in that which does not possess a material body
liṅga-bhāvanā
accepting the material body to be the self
eṣa priyāpriyair yogo
eṣaḥ
this
priya
with those who are very dear
apriyaiḥ
and with those who are not dear (enemies, those not in the family, etc.)
yogaḥ
connection
viyogaḥ karma-saṁsṛtiḥ
viyogaḥ
separation
karma
the fruits of action
saṁsṛtiḥ
the material condition of life
sambhavaś ca vināśaś ca
sambhavaḥ
accepting birth
ca
and
vināśaḥ
accepting death
ca
and
śokaś ca vividhaḥ smṛtaḥ
śokaḥ
lamentation
ca
and
vividhaḥ
varieties
smṛtaḥ
mentioned in scripture
avivekaś ca cintā ca
avivekaḥ
lack of discrimination
ca
and
cintā
anxiety
ca
also
vivekāsmṛtir eva ca
viveka
of proper discrimination
asmṛtiḥ
forgetfulness
eva
indeed
ca
also.
In his bewildered state, the living entity, accepting the body and mind to be the self, considers some people to be his kinsmen and others to be outsiders. Because of this misconception, he suffers. Indeed, the accumulation of such concocted material ideas is the cause of suffering and so-called happiness in the material world. The conditioned soul thus situated must take birth in different species and work in various types of consciousness, thus creating new bodies. This continued material life is called saṁsāra. Birth, death, lamentation, foolishness and anxiety are due to such material considerations. Thus we sometimes come to a proper understanding and sometimes fall again to a wrong conception of life.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The condition of the ātmā, which is different from its gross and subtle bodies, becomes reversed when it identifies with these bodies. This causes attaining what is desired and undesired, losing what is desired or undesired, karma, changing bodies, birth, death, lamentation, lack of discrimination, anxiety, and loss of discrimination after having possessed it. Though the ātmā is not the body, it identifies with it (liṅga-bhāvanā). This is an inversion of the ātmā’s condition. Because of this reversal, there is connection with desired objects and undesired objects, and separation from desired objects and undesired objects. There is karma and accepting various bodies (saṁsṛtiḥ). Vivekāsmṛtir means disappearance of discrimination after it has been present.
Mistaking body and mind for self, the conditioned soul carves the world into kin and outsiders, and suffers accordingly. The accumulation of such notions IS saṁsāra. Loosen the false categories and the suffering loosens with them.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'kin vs outsider' lines in your life are sustained only by bodily mistaken identity?
  • What suffering would dissolve if those lines were redrawn around the eternal soul?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.27

↗
अत्राप्युदाहरन्तीममितिहासं पुरातनम् । यमस्य प्रेतबन्धूनां संवादं तं निबोधत ॥ २७ ॥
atrāpy udāharantīmam
[atraapy udaaharanteemam]
itihāsaṁ purātanam
[itihaasam puraatanam]
yamasya preta-bandhūnāṁ
[yamasya preta-bandhoonaam]
saṁvādaṁ taṁ nibodhata
[samvaadam tam nibodhata]
atra — in this connection api — indeed udāharanti — they cite imam — this itihāsam — history purātanam — very old yamasya — of Yamarāja, the superintendent of death, who gives judgment after death preta-bandhūnām — of the friends of a dead man saṁvādam — discussion tam — that nibodhata — try to understand.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atrāpy udāharantīmam
atra
in this connection
api
indeed
udāharanti
they cite
imam
this
itihāsaṁ purātanam
itihāsam
history
purātanam
very old
yamasya preta-bandhūnāṁ
yamasya
of Yamarāja, the superintendent of death, who gives judgment after death
preta-bandhūnām
of the friends of a dead man
saṁvādaṁ taṁ nibodhata
saṁvādam
discussion
tam
that
nibodhata
try to understand.
In this regard, an example is given from an old history. This involves a discourse between Yamarāja and the friends of a dead person. Please hear it attentively.

The words itihāsaṁ purātanam mean “an old history.” The Purāṇas are not chronologically recorded, but the incidents mentioned in the Purāṇas are actual histories of bygone ages. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is the Mahā-purāṇa, the essence of all the Purāṇas. The Māyāvādī scholars do not accept the Purāṇas, but Śrīla Madhvācārya and all other authorities accept them as the authoritative histories of the world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In this regard, an example is given from an old history. Please hear the discussion between Yamarāja and the friends of a dead person. This is a story of lamenting for something that does not deserve lamentation. It is a discussion of Yamarāja with the friends of a deceased person (preta).
Hiraṇyakaśipu cites an old history — a dialogue between Yamarāja and grieving relatives. The Purāṇas, though not chronological, record real events; their stories serve as mirrors for our own grief and confusion. Trust the wisdom carried in ancient narrative.
Reflection Questions
  • Which sacred story is currently serving as the mirror for your own life?
  • What old account from your tradition could speak directly to your present grief?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.28

↗
उशीनरेष्वभूद्राजा सुयज्ञ इति विश्रुत: । सपत्नैर्निहतो युद्धे ज्ञातयस्तमुपासत ॥ २८ ॥
uśīnareṣv abhūd rājā
[usheenareshv abhood raajaa]
suyajña iti viśrutaḥ
[suyajna iti vishrutah]
sapatnair nihato yuddhe
[sapatnair nihato yuddhe]
jñātayas tam upāsata
[jnaatayas tam upaasata]
uśīnareṣu — in the state known as Uśīnara abhūt — there was rājā — a king suyajñaḥ — Suyajña iti — thus viśrutaḥ — celebrated sapatnaiḥ — by enemies nihataḥ — killed yuddhe — in war jñātayaḥ — the kinsmen tam — him upāsata — sat around.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uśīnareṣv abhūd rājā
uśīnareṣu
in the state known as Uśīnara
abhūt
there was
rājā
a king
suyajña iti viśrutaḥ
suyajñaḥ
Suyajña
iti
thus
viśrutaḥ
celebrated
sapatnair nihato yuddhe
sapatnaiḥ
by enemies
nihataḥ
killed
yuddhe
in war
jñātayas tam upāsata
jñātayaḥ
the kinsmen
tam
him
upāsata
sat around.
In the state known as Uśīnara there was a celebrated king named Suyajña. When the King was killed in battle by his enemies, his kinsmen sat down around the dead body and began to lament the death of their friend.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In Uśīnara there was a famous king named Suyajña. He was killed during war by enemies. The relatives sat around his dead body.
King Suyajña, killed in battle, lies surrounded by lamenting kinsmen. Even kings die in war, and even the powerful are mourned. No status protects from the inevitable; only knowledge of the soul does.
Reflection Questions
  • What status are you accumulating as if it will protect you from this scene?
  • How would you live differently if you could feel that even kings end like this?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.29-31

↗
विशीर्णरत्नकवचं विभ्रष्टाभरणस्रजम् । शरनिर्भिन्नहृदयं शयानमसृगाविलम् ॥ २९ ॥ प्रकीर्णकेशं ध्वस्ताक्षं रभसा दष्टदच्छदम् । रज:कुण्ठमुखाम्भोजं छिन्नायुधभुजं मृधे ॥ ३० ॥ उशीनरेन्द्रं विधिना तथा कृतं पतिं महिष्य: प्रसमीक्ष्य दु:खिता: । हता: स्म नाथेति करैरुरो भृशं घ्नन्त्यो मुहुस्तत्पदयोरुपापतन् ॥ ३१ ॥
viśīrṇa-ratna-kavacaṁ
[visheerna-ratna-kavacham]
vibhraṣṭābharaṇa-srajam
[vibhrashtaabharana-srajam]
śara-nirbhinna-hṛdayaṁ
[shara-nirbhinna-hridayam]
śayānam asṛg-āvilam
[shayaanam asrig-aavilam]
prakīrṇa-keśaṁ dhvastākṣaṁ
[prakeerna-kesham dhvastaaksham]
rabhasā daṣṭa-dacchadam
[rabhasaa dashta-dachchadam]
rajaḥ-kuṇṭha-mukhāmbhojaṁ
[rajah-kuntha-mukhaambhojam]
chinnāyudha-bhujaṁ mṛdhe
[chinnaayudha-bhujam mridhe]
uśīnarendraṁ vidhinā tathā kṛtaṁ
[usheenarendram vidhinaa tathaa kritam]
patiṁ mahiṣyaḥ prasamīkṣya duḥkhitāḥ
[patim mahishyah prasameekshya duhkhitaah]
hatāḥ sma nātheti karair uro bhṛśaṁ
[hataah sma naatheti karair uro bhrisham]
ghnantyo muhus tat-padayor upāpatan
[ghnantyo muhus tat-padayor upaapatan]
viśīrṇa — scattered here and there ratna — made of jewels kavacam — protective armor vibhraṣṭa — fallen off ābharaṇa — ornaments srajam — garlands śara-nirbhinna — pierced by arrows hṛdayam — the heart śayānam — lying down asṛk-āvilam — smeared with blood prakīrṇa-keśam — his hair loosened and scattered dhvasta-akṣam — his eyes obscured rabhasā — with anger daṣṭa — bitten dacchadam — his lips rajaḥ-kuṇṭha — covered with dust mukha-ambhojam — his face, which had formerly resembled a lotus flower chinna — cut off āyudha-bhujam — his arms and weapons mṛdhe — on the battlefield uśīnara-indram — the master of the state of Uśīnara vidhinā — by providence tathā — thus kṛtam — forced into this position patim — the husband mahiṣyaḥ — the queens prasamīkṣya — seeing duḥkhitāḥ — very much aggrieved hatāḥ — killed sma — certainly nātha — O husband iti — thus karaiḥ — with the hands uraḥ — the breast bhṛśam — constantly ghnantyaḥ — pounding muhuḥ — again and again tat-padayoḥ — at the feet of the King upāpatan — fell down.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viśīrṇa-ratna-kavacaṁ
viśīrṇa
scattered here and there
ratna
made of jewels
kavacam
protective armor
vibhraṣṭābharaṇa-srajam
vibhraṣṭa
fallen off
ābharaṇa
ornaments
srajam
garlands
śara-nirbhinna-hṛdayaṁ
śara-nirbhinna
pierced by arrows
hṛdayam
the heart
śayānam asṛg-āvilam
śayānam
lying down
asṛk-āvilam
smeared with blood
prakīrṇa-keśaṁ dhvastākṣaṁ
prakīrṇa-keśam
his hair loosened and scattered
dhvasta-akṣam
his eyes obscured
rabhasā daṣṭa-dacchadam
rabhasā
with anger
daṣṭa
bitten
dacchadam
his lips
rajaḥ-kuṇṭha-mukhāmbhojaṁ
rajaḥ-kuṇṭha
covered with dust
mukha-ambhojam
his face, which had formerly resembled a lotus flower
chinnāyudha-bhujaṁ mṛdhe
chinna
cut off
āyudha-bhujam
his arms and weapons
mṛdhe
on the battlefield
uśīnarendraṁ vidhinā tathā kṛtaṁ
uśīnara-indram
the master of the state of Uśīnara
vidhinā
by providence
tathā
thus
kṛtam
forced into this position
patiṁ mahiṣyaḥ prasamīkṣya duḥkhitāḥ
patim
the husband
mahiṣyaḥ
the queens
prasamīkṣya
seeing
duḥkhitāḥ
very much aggrieved
hatāḥ sma nātheti karair uro bhṛśaṁ
hatāḥ
killed
sma
certainly
nātha
O husband
iti
thus
karaiḥ
with the hands
uraḥ
the breast
bhṛśam
constantly
ghnantyo muhus tat-padayor upāpatan
ghnantyaḥ
pounding
muhuḥ
again and again
tat-padayoḥ
at the feet of the King
upāpatan
fell down.
His golden, bejeweled armor smashed, his ornaments and garlands fallen from their places, his hair scattered and his eyes lusterless, the slain King lay on the battlefield, his entire body smeared with blood, his heart pierced by the arrows of the enemy. When he died he had wanted to show his prowess, and thus he had bitten his lips, and his teeth remained in that position. His beautiful lotuslike face was now black and covered with dust from the battlefield. His arms, with his sword and other weapons, were cut and broken. When the queens of the King of Uśīnara saw their husband lying in that position, they began crying, “O lord, now that you have been killed, we also have been killed.” Repeating these words again and again, they fell down, pounding their breasts, at the feet of the dead King.

As stated here, rabhasā daṣṭa-dacchadam: the dead King, while fighting in anger, bit his lips to show his prowess, but nonetheless he was killed by providence ( vidhinā ). This proves that we are controlled by higher authorities; our personal power or endeavor is not always supreme. We must therefore accept the position offered to us by the order of the Supreme.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the queens saw their husband, King of Uśīnara, killed by fate, biting his lips in anger, his bejeweled armor smashed, his ornaments and garlands fallen from their places, his heart pierced by arrows, his body smeared with blood, his hair scattered, his eyes lusterless, his lotus face covered with dust, his arms and weapons broken, they began to lament. "O lord, now that you have been killed, we also have been killed." They fell down at the feet of the dead King, pounding their breasts repeatedly. The King had bitten his lip in anger (rabhasā), while fighting, and at that moment he had been hit by the weapon of the enemy. He died in that condition.
Suyajña's queens fall on his shattered body, weeping that they too have died with him. Worldly love often defines itself by what cannot survive separation. The shock of death exposes how identified we are with another person's body.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose loss would, today, feel like the death of part of you — and what does that tell you about your identification?
  • How could that love be reframed so that the soul, not the body, becomes its true object?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.32

↗
रुदत्य उच्चैर्दयिताङ्‌घ्रिपङ्कजं सिञ्चन्त्य अस्रै: कुचकुङ्कुमारुणै: । विस्रस्तकेशाभरणा: शुचं नृणां सृजन्त्य आक्रन्दनया विलेपिरे ॥ ३२ ॥
rudatya uccair dayitāṅghri-paṅkajaṁ
[rudatya uchchair dayitaanghri-pankajam]
siñcantya asraiḥ kuca-kuṅkumāruṇaiḥ
[sinchantya asraih kucha-kunkumaarunaih]
visrasta-keśābharaṇāḥ śucaṁ nṛṇāṁ
[visrasta-keshaabharanaah shucham nrinaam]
sṛjantya ākrandanayā vilepire
[srijantya aakrandanayaa vilepire]
rudatyaḥ — crying uccaiḥ — very loudly dayita — of their beloved husband aṅghri-paṅkajam — the lotus feet siñcantyaḥ — moistening asraiḥ — with tears kuca-kuṅkuma-aruṇaiḥ — which were red from the kuṅkuma covering their breasts visrasta — scattered keśa — hair ābharaṇāḥ — and ornaments śucam — grief nṛṇām — of the people in general sṛjantyaḥ — creating ākrandanayā — by crying very pitiably vilepire — began to lament.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rudatya uccair dayitāṅghri-paṅkajaṁ
rudatyaḥ
crying
uccaiḥ
very loudly
dayita
of their beloved husband
aṅghri-paṅkajam
the lotus feet
siñcantya asraiḥ kuca-kuṅkumāruṇaiḥ
siñcantyaḥ
moistening
asraiḥ
with tears
kuca-kuṅkuma-aruṇaiḥ
which were red from the kuṅkuma covering their breasts
visrasta-keśābharaṇāḥ śucaṁ nṛṇāṁ
visrasta
scattered
keśa
hair
ābharaṇāḥ
and ornaments
śucam
grief
nṛṇām
of the people in general
sṛjantya ākrandanayā vilepire
sṛjantyaḥ
creating
ākrandanayā
by crying very pitiably
vilepire
began to lament.
As the queens loudly cried, their tears glided down their breasts, becoming reddened by kuṅkuma powder, and fell upon the lotus feet of their husband. Their hair became disarrayed, their ornaments fell, and in a way that evoked sympathy from the hearts of others, the queens began lamenting their husband’s death.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As the queens loudly cried, their tears, reddened by kuṅkuma powder on their breasts, moistened the lotus feet of their husband. With their hair and ornaments in disarray, causing grief in all people, they lamented by crying.
The queens' tears mix with kuṅkuma and fall onto the dead king's feet; their hair is undone, their ornaments scattered. The aesthetic of mourning hides how little it can do for the dead. Beautiful grief is still grief in ignorance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you mistaken the beauty of your grief for its wisdom?
  • What would mourning informed by knowledge of the soul actually look like?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.33

↗
अहो विधात्राकरुणेन न: प्रभो भवान् प्रणीतो द‍ृगगोचरां दशाम् । उशीनराणामसि वृत्तिद: पुरा कृतोऽधुना येन शुचां विवर्धन: ॥ ३३ ॥
aho vidhātrākaruṇena naḥ prabho
[aho vidhaatraakarunena nah prabho]
bhavān praṇīto dṛg-agocarāṁ daśām
[bhavaan praneeto drig-agocharaam dashaam]
uśīnarāṇām asi vṛttidaḥ purā
[usheenaraanaam asi vrittidah puraa]
kṛto ’dhunā yena śucāṁ vivardhanaḥ
[krito ’dhunaa yena shuchaam vivardhanah]
aho — alas vidhātrā — by providence akaruṇena — who is merciless naḥ — our prabho — O lord bhavān — Your Lordship praṇītaḥ — taken away dṛk — of sight agocarām — beyond the range daśām — to a state uśīnarāṇām — to the inhabitants of the state of Uśīnara asi — you were vṛtti-daḥ — giving livelihood purā — formerly kṛtaḥ — finished adhunā — now yena — by whom śucām — of lamentation vivardhanaḥ — increasing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho vidhātrākaruṇena naḥ prabho
aho
alas
vidhātrā
by providence
akaruṇena
who is merciless
naḥ
our
prabho
O lord
bhavān praṇīto dṛg-agocarāṁ daśām
bhavān
Your Lordship
praṇītaḥ
taken away
dṛk
of sight
agocarām
beyond the range
daśām
to a state
uśīnarāṇām asi vṛttidaḥ purā
uśīnarāṇām
to the inhabitants of the state of Uśīnara
asi
you were
vṛtti-daḥ
giving livelihood
purā
formerly
kṛto ’dhunā yena śucāṁ vivardhanaḥ
kṛtaḥ
finished
adhunā
now
yena
by whom
śucām
of lamentation
vivardhanaḥ
increasing.
O lord, you have now been removed by cruel providence to a state beyond our sight. You had previously sustained the livelihood of the inhabitants of Uśīnara, and thus they were happy, but your condition now is the cause of their unhappiness.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O lord! You have now been taken somewhere beyond our sight by cruel providence, which has made you, previously the maintainer of Uśīnara, increase the lamentation of the population of Uśīnara. They lament. You have been taken by providence, which has made you now increase the lamentation of the population.
The queens cry that cruel providence has snatched their lord away. Conditioned grief always blames an external force — fate, God, circumstance. Naming providence as 'cruel' is a refusal to enter the mystery of its plan.
Reflection Questions
  • What loss have you labeled as cruel providence rather than sat with as mystery?
  • How might that loss read differently if you trusted the planner behind it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.34

↗
त्वया कृतज्ञेन वयं महीपते कथं विना स्याम सुहृत्तमेन ते । तत्रानुयानं तव वीर पादयो: शुश्रूषतीनां दिश यत्र यास्यसि ॥ ३४ ॥
tvayā kṛtajñena vayaṁ mahī-pate
[tvayaa kritajnena vayam mahee-pate]
kathaṁ vinā syāma suhṛttamena te
[katham vinaa syaama suhrittamena te]
tatrānuyānaṁ tava vīra pādayoḥ
[tatraanuyaanam tava veera paadayoh]
śuśrūṣatīnāṁ diśa yatra yāsyasi
[shushrooshateenaam disha yatra yaasyasi]
tvayā — you kṛtajñena — a most grateful personality vayam — we mahī-pate — O King katham — how vinā — without syāma — shall exist suhṛt-tamena — the best of our friends te — of you tatra — there anuyānam — the following tava — of you vīra — O hero pādayoḥ — of the lotus feet śuśrūṣatīnām — of those engaging in the service diśa — please order yatra — where yāsyasi — you will go.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvayā kṛtajñena vayaṁ mahī-pate
tvayā
you
kṛtajñena
a most grateful personality
vayam
we
mahī-pate
O King
kathaṁ vinā syāma suhṛttamena te
katham
how
vinā
without
syāma
shall exist
suhṛt-tamena
the best of our friends
te
of you
tatrānuyānaṁ tava vīra pādayoḥ
tatra
there
anuyānam
the following
tava
of you
vīra
O hero
pādayoḥ
of the lotus feet
śuśrūṣatīnāṁ diśa yatra yāsyasi
śuśrūṣatīnām
of those engaging in the service
diśa
please order
yatra
where
yāsyasi
you will go.
O King, O hero, you were a very grateful husband and the most sincere friend of all of us. How shall we exist without you? O hero, wherever you are going, please direct us there so that we may follow in your footsteps and engage again in your service. Let us go along with you!

Formerly, a kṣatriya king was generally the husband of many wives, and after the death of the king, especially in the battlefield, all the queens would agree to accept saha-māraṇa, dying with the husband who was their life. When Pāṇḍu Mahārāja, the father of the Pāṇḍavas, died, his two wives — namely, the mother of Yudhiṣṭhira, Bhīma and Arjuna and the mother of Nakula and Sahadeva — were both ready to die in the fire with their husband. Later, after a compromise was arranged, Kuntī stayed alive to care for the little children, and the other wife, Mādrī, was allowed to die with her husband. This system of saha-māraṇa continued in India even until the time of British rule, but later it was discouraged, since the attitude of wives gradually changed with the advancement of Kali-yuga. Thus the system of saha-māraṇa has practically been abolished. Nevertheless, within the past fifty years I have seen the wife of a medical practitioner voluntarily accept death immediately when her husband died. Both the husband and wife were taken in procession in the mourning cart. Such intense love of a chaste wife for her husband is a special case.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! O hero! How shall we exist without you, a grateful husband and best friend? Please give us the order to follow you wherever you will go to serve your feet. Give us the order to follow you where you go in order to serve your feet. This means “We will die also.”
The queens beg to follow the dead king wherever he is going, ready for saha-māraṇa. Devotion to a person can be so total that the survivor sees no life apart from them. Such intensity of attachment, if redirected toward the Lord, would be liberation itself.
Reflection Questions
  • What attachment in your life is intense enough that it could be redirected toward God?
  • Where do you wish 'to follow' another rather than face your own next chapter?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.35

↗
एवं विलपतीनां वै परिगृह्य मृतं पतिम् । अनिच्छतीनां निर्हारमर्कोऽस्तं सन्न्यवर्तत ॥ ३५ ॥
evaṁ vilapatīnāṁ vai
[evam vilapateenaam vai]
parigṛhya mṛtaṁ patim
[parigrihya mritam patim]
anicchatīnāṁ nirhāram
[anichchateenaam nirhaaram]
arko ’staṁ sannyavartata
[arko ’stam sannyavartata]
evam — thus vilapatīnām — of the lamenting queens vai — indeed parigṛhya — taking on their laps mṛtam — the dead patim — husband anicchatīnām — not desiring nirhāram — the carrying out of the body for the funeral ceremony arkaḥ — the sun astam — the setting position sannyavartata — passed away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vilapatīnāṁ vai
evam
thus
vilapatīnām
of the lamenting queens
vai
indeed
parigṛhya mṛtaṁ patim
parigṛhya
taking on their laps
mṛtam
the dead
patim
husband
anicchatīnāṁ nirhāram
anicchatīnām
not desiring
nirhāram
the carrying out of the body for the funeral ceremony
arko ’staṁ sannyavartata
arkaḥ
the sun
astam
the setting position
sannyavartata
passed away.
The time was appropriate for the body to be burned, but the queens, not allowing it to be taken away, continued lamenting for the dead body, which they kept on their laps. In the meantime, the sun completed its movements for setting in the west.

According to the Vedic system, if a person dies during the daytime it is customary for his funeral ceremony to be performed before the sun sets, regardless of whether he is burned or buried, and if he dies at night the funeral must be completed before the next sunrise. Apparently the queens continued lamenting for the dead body, the lump of matter, and would not allow it to be taken away for burning. This illustrates the strong grip of illusion among foolish persons who consider the body the self. Women are generally considered less intelligent. Because of ignorance only, the queens thought of the dead body as their husband and somehow or other thought that if the body were kept their husband would remain with them. Such a conception of the self is certainly for go-khara — cows and asses. We have actually seen that sometimes when a cow’s calf has died the milkman cheats the cow by presenting before her the dead body of her calf. Thus the cow, who would not otherwise allow milking, licks the dead body of the calf and allows herself to be milked. This substantiates the description of the śāstra that a foolish man in the bodily concept of life is like a cow. Not only do foolish men and women consider the body the self, but we have even seen that the dead body of a so-called yogī was kept for days by his disciples, who thought that their guru was in samādhi. When decomposition began and a bad smell unfortunately began to overwhelm the yogic power, the disciples allowed the dead body of the so-called yogī to be burned. Thus the bodily concept of life is extremely strong among foolish persons, who are compared to cows and asses. Nowadays, great scientists are trying to freeze dead bodies so that in the future these frozen bodies may again be brought to life. The incident narrated by Hiraṇyakaśipu from history must have taken place millions of years ago because Hiraṇyakaśipu lived millions of years ago and was even then quoting from history. Thus the incident occurred before Hiraṇyakaśipu’s lifetime, but the same ignorance in the bodily concept of life is still prevalent, not only among laymen but even among scientists who think they will be able to revive frozen corpses.

Apparently the queens did not want to deliver the dead body for burning because they were afraid of dying with the dead body of their husband.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While the lamenting wives, holding the dead body on their laps, did not want to the body go for burning, the sun set. Nirhāram means “taking the body for burning.” The sun gave up the western mountain (astam) and stopped its movement (sannyavartata).
The queens refuse to release the body for cremation as the sun sets. Illusion is stubborn — it keeps a corpse on its lap rather than admit the soul has gone. Holding tight to forms after their life has fled is one of grief's cruelest forms.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'body' in your life — a relationship, role, plan — are you still cradling though its life has departed?
  • What ritual of release would let you honor what was without holding what is gone?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.36

↗
तत्र ह प्रेतबन्धूनामाश्रुत्य परिदेवितम् । आह तान् बालको भूत्वा यम: स्वयमुपागत: ॥ ३६ ॥
tatra ha preta-bandhūnām
[tatra ha preta-bandhoonaam]
āśrutya paridevitam
[aashrutya paridevitam]
āha tān bālako bhūtvā
[aaha taan baalako bhootvaa]
yamaḥ svayam upāgataḥ
[yamah svayam upaagatah]
tatra — there ha — certainly preta-bandhūnām — of the friends and relatives of the dead King āśrutya — hearing paridevitam — the loud lamentation (so loud that it could be heard from the planet of Yamarāja) āha — said tān — unto them (the lamenting queens) bālakaḥ — a boy bhūtvā — becoming yamaḥ — Yamarāja, the superintendent of death svayam — personally upāgataḥ — after coming.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra ha preta-bandhūnām
tatra
there
ha
certainly
preta-bandhūnām
of the friends and relatives of the dead King
āśrutya paridevitam
āśrutya
hearing
paridevitam
the loud lamentation (so loud that it could be heard from the planet of Yamarāja)
āha tān bālako bhūtvā
āha
said
tān
unto them (the lamenting queens)
bālakaḥ
a boy
bhūtvā
becoming
yamaḥ svayam upāgataḥ
yamaḥ
Yamarāja, the superintendent of death
svayam
personally
upāgataḥ
after coming.
While the queens were lamenting for the dead body of the King, their loud cries were heard even from the abode of Yamarāja. Assuming the body of a boy, Yamarāja personally approached the relatives of the dead body and advised them as follows.

Sometimes the living entity is forced to give up his body and enter another one according to the judgment of Yamarāja. It is difficult, however, for the conditioned soul to enter another body unless the present dead body is annihilated through cremation or some other means. The living being has attachment for the present body and does not want to enter another, and thus in the interim he remains a ghost. If a living being who has already left his body has been pious, Yamarāja, just to give him relief, will give him another body. Since the living being in the body of the King had some attachment to his body, he was hovering as a ghost, and therefore Yamarāja, as a special consideration, approached the lamenting relatives to instruct them personally. Yamarāja approached them as a child because a child is not restricted but is granted admittance anywhere, even to the palace of a king. Besides this, the child was speaking philosophy. People are very much interested in hearing philosophy when it is spoken by a child.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hearing the lamentation of the friends of the departed king, Yamarāja took the form of a boy, went there, and spoke to them. Yamarāja personally went. Some say that generally Yama comes personally for pious persons and takes them to his city after their bodies are burned. Some explain that, among the women, a few were devotees, so Yama’s servants could not approach. Thus Yama himself came to take the body from them. Yamarāja took the form of a boy, because others could not enter such a form, because a child speaking is very sweet, and because a boy speaking philosophy would be astonishing and would inspire them to take up the instructions.
Yamarāja himself, hearing the cries, comes as a small boy to instruct the grieving. Death personified arrives in the form of innocence. Sometimes the deepest teaching about loss comes from the most unexpected messenger.
Reflection Questions
  • From whom — perhaps unexpected — is wisdom about your grief currently being offered?
  • Are you missing a small voice that is carrying a large truth?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.37

↗
श्रीयम उवाच अहो अमीषां वयसाधिकानां विपश्यतां लोकविधिं विमोह: । यत्रागतस्तत्र गतं मनुष्यं स्वयं सधर्मा अपि शोचन्त्यपार्थम् ॥ ३७ ॥
śrī-yama uvāca
[shree-yama uvaacha]
aho amīṣāṁ vayasādhikānāṁ
[aho ameeshaam vayasaadhikaanaam]
vipaśyatāṁ loka-vidhiṁ vimohaḥ
[vipashyataam loka-vidhim vimohah]
yatrāgatas tatra gataṁ manuṣyaṁ
[yatraagatas tatra gatam manushyam]
svayaṁ sadharmā api śocanty apārtham
[svayam sadharmaa api shochanty apaartham]
śrī-yamaḥ uvāca — Śrī Yamarāja said aho — alas amīṣām — of these vayasā — by age adhikānām — of those advanced vipaśyatām — seeing every day loka-vidhim — the law of nature (that everyone dies) vimohaḥ — the bewilderment yatra — from where āgataḥ — came tatra — there gatam — returned manuṣyam — the man svayam — themselves sa-dharmāḥ — similar in nature (prone to die) api — although śocanti — they lament apārtham — uselessly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-yama uvāca
śrī-yamaḥ uvāca
Śrī Yamarāja said
aho amīṣāṁ vayasādhikānāṁ
aho
alas
amīṣām
of these
vayasā
by age
adhikānām
of those advanced
vipaśyatāṁ loka-vidhiṁ vimohaḥ
vipaśyatām
seeing every day
loka-vidhim
the law of nature (that everyone dies)
vimohaḥ
the bewilderment
yatrāgatas tatra gataṁ manuṣyaṁ
yatra
from where
āgataḥ
came
tatra
there
gatam
returned
manuṣyam
the man
svayaṁ sadharmā api śocanty apārtham
svayam
themselves
sa-dharmāḥ
similar in nature (prone to die)
api
although
śocanti
they lament
apārtham
uselessly.
Śrī Yamarāja said: Alas, how amazing it is! These persons, who are older than me, have full experience that hundreds and thousands of living entities have taken birth and died. Thus they should understand that they also are apt to die, yet still they are bewildered. The conditioned soul comes from an unknown place and returns after death to that same unknown place. There is no exception to this rule, which is conducted by material nature. Knowing this, why do they uselessly lament?

The Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (2.28) :

avyaktādīni bhūtāni vyakta-madhyāni bhārata avyakta-nidhanāny eva tatra kā paridevanā

“All created beings are unmanifest in their beginning, manifest in their interim state, and unmanifest again when they are annihilated. So what need is there for lamentation?”

Accepting that there are two classes of philosophers, one believing in the existence of the soul and the other not believing in its existence, there is no cause for lamentation in either case. Nonbelievers in the existence of the soul are called atheists by followers of Vedic wisdom. Yet even if for argument’s sake we accept the atheistic theory, there is still no cause for lamentation. Apart from the separate existence of the soul, the material elements remain unmanifested before creation. From this subtle state of unmanifestation comes manifestation, just as from ether, air is generated; from air, fire is generated; from fire, water is generated; and from water, earth becomes manifested. From the earth, many varieties of manifestations take place. For example, a big skyscraper is manifested from the earth. When it is dismantled, the manifestation becomes again unmanifested and remains as atoms in the ultimate stage. The law of conservation of energy remains, but in the course of time things are manifested and unmanifested — that is the difference. Then what cause is there for lamentation, in either manifestation or unmanifestation? Somehow or other, even in the unmanifested stage, things are not lost. Both at the beginning and at the end, all elements remain unmanifested, and this does not make any real material difference.

If we accept the Vedic conclusion as stated in the Bhagavad-gītā ( antavanta ime dehāḥ ) that these material bodies are perishable in due course of time ( nityasyoktāḥ śarīriṇaḥ ) but that the soul is eternal, then we must remember always that the body is like a dress; therefore why lament the changing of a dress? The material body has no factual existence in relation to the eternal soul. It is something like a dream. In a dream we may think of flying in the sky or sitting on a chariot as a king, but when we wake up we can see that we are neither in the sky nor seated on the chariot. The Vedic wisdom encourages self-realization on the basis of the nonexistence of the material body. Therefore, in either case, whether one believes in the existence of the soul or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation for loss of the body.

In the Mahābhārata it is said, adarśanād ihāyātaḥ punaś cādarśanaṁ gataḥ. This statement could support the theory of the atheistic scientist that the child in the womb of the mother has no life but is simply a lump of matter. To follow this theory, if the lump of matter is aborted by a surgical operation, no life is killed; the body of a child is like a tumor, and if a tumor is operated upon and thrown away, no sin is involved. The same argument could be put forward in regard to the King and his queens. The body of the King was manifested from an unmanifested source, and again it became unmanifested from manifestation. Since the manifestation exists only in the middle — between the two points of unmanifestation — why should one cry for the body manifested in the interim?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Yamarāja said: Persons older than me, seeing the law of birth and death, are bewildered. The body goes to some unknown place from which it has come. Persons who take birth and die are lamenting uselessly. Yatra means “from an unknown state.” It is said in the Gītā: avyaktādīni bhūtāni vyakta-madhyāni-bhārata | avyakta-nidhanāny eva tatra kā paridevanā || Living entities are invisible in the beginning, manifest in the middle, and invisible at the end. What is there to lament in this? BG 2.28
The boy Yamarāja marvels that adults who have witnessed countless deaths still think themselves exempt. The soul comes from an unknown place and returns there — why lament a passage no one controls? Knowledge does not require us to like the news; it asks us to stop being surprised.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are you still surprised by mortality, despite all the evidence?
  • What would change in your day if you stopped expecting permanence anywhere?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.38

↗
अहो वयं धन्यतमा यदत्र त्यक्ता: पितृभ्यां न विचिन्तयाम: । अभक्ष्यमाणा अबला वृकादिभि: स रक्षिता रक्षति यो हि गर्भे ॥ ३८ ॥
aho vayaṁ dhanyatamā yad atra
[aho vayam dhanyatamaa yad atra]
tyaktāḥ pitṛbhyāṁ na vicintayāmaḥ
[tyaktaah pitribhyaam na vichintayaamah]
abhakṣyamāṇā abalā vṛkādibhiḥ
[abhakshyamaanaa abalaa vrikaadibhih]
sa rakṣitā rakṣati yo hi garbhe
[sa rakshitaa rakshati yo hi garbhe]
aho — alas vayam — we dhanya-tamāḥ — most fortunate yat — because atra — at the present moment tyaktāḥ — left alone, without protection pitṛbhyām — by both father and mother na — not vicintayāmaḥ — worry abhakṣyamāṇāḥ — not being eaten abalāḥ — very weak vṛka-ādibhiḥ — by tigers and other ferocious animals saḥ — He (the Supreme Personality of Godhead) rakṣitā — will protect rakṣati — has protected yaḥ — who hi — indeed garbhe — within the womb.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho vayaṁ dhanyatamā yad atra
aho
alas
vayam
we
dhanya-tamāḥ
most fortunate
yat
because
atra
at the present moment
tyaktāḥ pitṛbhyāṁ na vicintayāmaḥ
tyaktāḥ
left alone, without protection
pitṛbhyām
by both father and mother
na
not
vicintayāmaḥ
worry
abhakṣyamāṇā abalā vṛkādibhiḥ
abhakṣyamāṇāḥ
not being eaten
abalāḥ
very weak
vṛka-ādibhiḥ
by tigers and other ferocious animals
sa rakṣitā rakṣati yo hi garbhe
saḥ
He (the Supreme Personality of Godhead)
rakṣitā
will protect
rakṣati
has protected
yaḥ
who
hi
indeed
garbhe
within the womb.
It is wonderful that these elderly women do not have a higher sense of life than we do. Indeed, we are most fortunate, for although we are children and have been left to struggle in material life, unprotected by father and mother, and although we are very weak, we have not been vanquished or eaten by ferocious animals. Thus we have a firm belief that the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who has given us protection even in the womb of the mother, will protect us everywhere.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (18.61) , īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe ’rjuna tiṣṭhati: the Lord is present in the core of everyone’s heart. Thus the Lord gives protection to everyone and gives the different types of bodies the living entity wants to enjoy. Everything is done by the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore one should not lament the birth and death of a living being, which have been arranged by the Supreme Lord. Lord Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “I am seated in everyone’s heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness.” One must act according to the direction of the Lord within the heart, but because the conditioned soul wants to act independently, the Lord gives him the facility to act and experience the reactions. The Lord says, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja: “Give up all other duties and simply surrender unto Me.” One who does not abide by the orders of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is given the facility to enjoy this material world. Instead of restricting him, the Lord gives the conditioned soul the opportunity to enjoy so that by mature experience, after many, many births ( bahūnāṁ janmanām ante ), he will understand that surrender to the lotus feet of Vāsudeva is the only duty of all living beings.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh women! I am fortunate because, though abandoned by my mother and father, I have not been eaten by wolves. Thus I do not worry. He who protects me in the womb is my protector now. Though young I have understanding, but these persons do not. He speaks in amazement.
The boy points out that he and the other children survived in the womb and survived being abandoned — the Lord protects everywhere. Childlike trust in the Supreme is a higher knowledge than adult grief. Faith in the Lord's care is the antidote to existential terror.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is your trust thinner than a child's though your experience is greater?
  • What past protection in your life have you forgotten that should ground today's faith?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.39

↗
य इच्छयेश: सृजतीदमव्ययो य एव रक्षत्यवलुम्पते च य: । तस्याबला: क्रीडनमाहुरीशितु- श्चराचरं निग्रहसङ्ग्रहे प्रभु: ॥ ३९ ॥
ya icchayeśaḥ sṛjatīdam avyayo
[ya ichchayeshah srijateedam avyayo]
ya eva rakṣaty avalumpate ca yaḥ
[ya eva rakshaty avalumpate cha yah]
tasyābalāḥ krīḍanam āhur īśituś
[tasyaabalaah kreedanam aahur eeshitush]
carācaraṁ nigraha-saṅgrahe prabhuḥ
[charaacharam nigraha-sangrahe prabhuh]
yaḥ — who icchayā — by His will (without being forced by anyone) īśaḥ — the supreme controller sṛjati — creates idam — this (material world) avyayaḥ — remaining as He is (not having lost His own existence because of having created so many material manifestations) yaḥ — who eva — indeed rakṣati — maintains avalumpate — annihilates ca — also yaḥ — who tasya — of Him abalāḥ — O poor women krīḍanam — the playing āhuḥ — they say īśituḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead cara-acaram — moving and not moving nigraha — in destruction saṅgrahe — or in protection prabhuḥ — fully able.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ya icchayeśaḥ sṛjatīdam avyayo
yaḥ
who
icchayā
by His will (without being forced by anyone)
ya eva rakṣaty avalumpate ca yaḥ
tasyābalāḥ krīḍanam āhur īśituś
īśaḥ
the supreme controller
sṛjati
creates
idam
this (material world)
avyayaḥ
remaining as He is (not having lost His own existence because of having created so many material manifestations)
yaḥ
who
eva
indeed
carācaraṁ nigraha-saṅgrahe prabhuḥ
rakṣati
maintains
avalumpate
annihilates
ca
also
yaḥ
who
tasya
of Him
abalāḥ
O poor women
krīḍanam
the playing
āhuḥ
they say
īśituḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
cara-acaram
moving and not moving
nigraha
in destruction
saṅgrahe
or in protection
prabhuḥ
fully able.
The boy addressed the women: O weak women! Only by the will of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is never diminished, is the entire world created, maintained and again annihilated. This is the verdict of the Vedic knowledge. This material creation, consisting of the moving and nonmoving, is exactly like His plaything. Being the Supreme Lord, He is completely competent to destroy and protect.

In this regard the queens might argue, “If our husband was protected by the Supreme Personality of Godhead when in the womb, why has he not been given protection now?” To this question the answer is, ya icchayeśaḥ sṛjatīdam avyayo ya eva rakṣaty avalumpate ca yaḥ. One cannot argue with the activities of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord is always free, and therefore He can protect and can also annihilate. He is not our order carrier; whatever He likes He will do. Therefore He is the Supreme Lord. The Lord does not create this material world at anyone’s request, and therefore He can annihilate everything merely by His will. That is His supremacy. If one argues, “Why does He act in this way?” the answer is that He can do so because He is supreme. No one can question His activities. If one argues, “What is the purpose of this sinful creation and annihilation?” the answer is that to prove His omnipotence He can do anything, and no one can question Him. If He were answerable to us concerning why He does something and why He does not, His supremacy would be curtailed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O women! They say that the world of moving and non-moving beings is simply the playing of the unchanging Lord who, by his will, creates, maintains and destroys this world. The Lord is capable of destroying and protecting. “O child! The Lord protected you in the womb. Why did he not protect our husband during war?” The Lord acts by his will, not on the request of others. “Why does he desire independently?” He is the controller. Because he has supreme power, independent of all others, seeking a cause for his will would simply negate his position of supreme power. “Why does he carry out creation and destruction?” O women! It is only his play. The Lord is fully capable of destroying (nigrahe) and protecting (saṁgrahe).
Creation, maintenance, and dissolution all happen by the Lord's will — the universe is His plaything. We cannot demand consistency in His protection; He acts freely because He is supreme. Surrender accepts this without bargaining.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you secretly bargain with God for consistency on your terms?
  • What would change if you let the Lord be supremely free in His dealings with you?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.40

↗
पथि च्युतं तिष्ठति दिष्टरक्षितं गृहे स्थितं तद्विहतं विनश्यति । जीवत्यनाथोऽपि तदीक्षितो वने गृहेऽभिगुप्तोऽस्य हतो न जीवति ॥ ४० ॥
pathi cyutaṁ tiṣṭhati diṣṭa-rakṣitaṁ
[pathi chyutam tishthati dishta-rakshitam]
gṛhe sthitaṁ tad-vihataṁ vinaśyati
[grihe sthitam tad-vihatam vinashyati]
jīvaty anātho ’pi tad-īkṣito vane
[jeevaty anaatho ’pi tad-eekshito vane]
gṛhe ’bhigupto ’sya hato na jīvati
[grihe ’bhigupto ’sya hato na jeevati]
pathi — on the public road cyutam — some possession dropped tiṣṭhati — it remains diṣṭa-rakṣitam — protected by destiny gṛhe — at home sthitam — although situated tat-vihatam — struck by the will of the Supreme vinaśyati — it is lost jīvati — remains alive anāthaḥ api — although without a protector tat-īkṣitaḥ — being protected by the Lord vane — in the forest gṛhe — at home abhiguptaḥ — well hidden and protected asya — of this one hataḥ — struck na — not jīvati — lives.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pathi cyutaṁ tiṣṭhati diṣṭa-rakṣitaṁ
pathi
on the public road
cyutam
some possession dropped
tiṣṭhati
it remains
diṣṭa-rakṣitam
protected by destiny
gṛhe sthitaṁ tad-vihataṁ vinaśyati
gṛhe
at home
sthitam
although situated
tat-vihatam
struck by the will of the Supreme
vinaśyati
it is lost
jīvaty anātho ’pi tad-īkṣito vane
jīvati
remains alive
anāthaḥ api
although without a protector
tat-īkṣitaḥ
being protected by the Lord
vane
in the forest
gṛhe ’bhigupto ’sya hato na jīvati
gṛhe
at home
abhiguptaḥ
well hidden and protected
asya
of this one
hataḥ
struck
na
not
jīvati
lives.
Sometimes one loses his money on a public street, where everyone can see it, and yet his money is protected by destiny and not seen by others. Thus the man who lost it gets it back. On the other hand, if the Lord does not give protection, even money maintained very securely at home is lost. If the Supreme Lord gives one protection, even though one has no protector and is in the jungle, one remains alive, whereas a person well protected at home by relatives and others sometimes dies, no one being able to protect him.

These are examples of the supremacy of the Lord. Our plans to protect or annihilate do not act, but whatever He thinks of doing actually happens. The examples given in this regard are practical. Everyone has had such practical experiences, and there are also many other clear examples. For instance, Prahlāda Mahārāja said that a child is certainly dependent on his father and mother, but in spite of their presence, the child is harassed in many ways. Sometimes, in spite of a supply of good medicine and an experienced physician, a patient does not survive. Therefore, since everything is dependent on the free will of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, our only duty is to surrender unto Him and seek His protection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What is dropped on the road is protected by the Lord. What remains in a house, but is rejected by the Lord, is destroyed. An unsheltered person lives in the forest by the mercy of the Lord. A person protected in his house, disregarded by the Lord, does not live. The Lord’s power is illustrated by positive and negative examples. Diṣṭa-rakṣitam means “protected by the Lord.” What is neglected by the Lord is destroyed. What is glanced upon by the Lord is protected. A person overlooked by the Lord is destroyed by others.
Money lost in plain sight may be returned by destiny; money locked at home may vanish. A person alone in the jungle may live; one surrounded by family may die. Protection comes from the Lord, not from arrangements. Trust the Source, not the safeguards.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'arrangements' are you over-trusting that actually depend on the Lord?
  • Where has unexpected protection in your life clearly come from beyond your planning?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.41

↗
भूतानि तैस्तैर्निजयोनिकर्मभि- र्भवन्ति काले न भवन्ति सर्वश: । न तत्र हात्मा प्रकृतावपि स्थित- स्तस्या गुणैरन्यतमो हि बध्यते ॥ ४१ ॥
bhūtāni tais tair nija-yoni-karmabhir
[bhootaani tais tair nija-yoni-karmabhir]
bhavanti kāle na bhavanti sarvaśaḥ
[bhavanti kaale na bhavanti sarvashah]
na tatra hātmā prakṛtāv api sthitas
[na tatra haatmaa prakritaav api sthitas]
tasyā guṇair anyatamo hi badhyate
[tasyaa gunair anyatamo hi badhyate]
bhūtāni — all the bodies of the living entities taiḥ taiḥ — their own respective nija-yoni — causing their own bodies karmabhiḥ — by past activities bhavanti — appear kāle — in due course of time na bhavanti — disappear sarvaśaḥ — in all respects na — not tatra — there ha — indeed ātmā — the soul prakṛtau — within this material world api — although sthitaḥ — situated tasyāḥ — of her (the material energy) guṇaiḥ — by different modes anya-tamaḥ — most different hi — indeed badhyate — is bound.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūtāni tais tair nija-yoni-karmabhir
bhūtāni
all the bodies of the living entities
taiḥ taiḥ
their own respective
nija-yoni
causing their own bodies
karmabhiḥ
by past activities
bhavanti kāle na bhavanti sarvaśaḥ
bhavanti
appear
kāle
in due course of time
na bhavanti
disappear
sarvaśaḥ
in all respects
na tatra hātmā prakṛtāv api sthitas
na
not
tatra
there
ha
indeed
ātmā
the soul
prakṛtau
within this material world
api
although
sthitaḥ
situated
tasyā guṇair anyatamo hi badhyate
tasyāḥ
of her (the material energy)
guṇaiḥ
by different modes
anya-tamaḥ
most different
hi
indeed
badhyate
is bound.
Every conditioned soul receives a different type of body according to his work, and when the engagement is finished the body is finished. Although the spirit soul is situated in subtle and gross material bodies in different forms of life, he is not bound by them, for he is always understood to be completely different from the manifested body.

Here it is very plainly explained that God is not responsible for the living entity’s accepting different types of bodies. One has to accept a body according to the laws of nature and one’s own karma. Therefore the Vedic injunction is that a person engaged in material activities should be given directions by which he can intelligently apply his activities to the service of the Lord to become free from the material bondage of repeated birth and death ( sva-karmaṇā tam abhyarcya siddhiṁ vindati mānavaḥ ). The Lord is always ready to give directions. Indeed, His directions are elaborately given in Bhagavad-gītā. If we take advantage of these directions, then in spite of our being conditioned by the laws of material nature, we shall become free to attain our original constitution ( mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te ). We should have firm faith that the Lord is supreme and that if we surrender to Him, He will take charge of us and indicate how we can get out of material life and return home, back to Godhead. Without such surrender, one is obliged to accept a certain type of body according to his karma, sometimes as an animal, sometimes a demigod and so on. Although the body is obtained and lost in due course of time, the spirit soul does not actually mix with the body, but is subjugated by the particular modes of nature with which he is sinfully associated. Spiritual education changes one’s consciousness so that one simply carries out the orders of the Supreme Lord and becomes free from the influence of the modes of material nature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The bodies of all beings appear and disappear by their karmas caused by themselves. The Paramātmā, different, though situated in the body, is not bound by the qualities of the body. “But then there is inequality in the Lord, because he favors one and ignores another.” The bodies of men and animals (bhūtāni) appear by individual karmas, causing their specific bodies. By one karma producing birth, a person becomes a pig. All (sarvaśaḥ) bodies appear and disappear in time. This is clear (ha). Though situated in a body (prakṛtau), the Paramātmā (ātmā), being different (anyatamaḥ), is not bound by the qualities of the body such as birth and death. Paramātmā makes the jīva experience the results of his good and bad karmas by his presence alone. That is his favoring or ignoring.
Each conditioned soul takes a body suited to its karma; when the task is done, the body ends. The soul, distinct from gross and subtle bodies, is never bound by them. God is not responsible for your body — your past activities are.
Reflection Questions
  • What past activities of yours are best explained by your present body and circumstance?
  • How might owning this responsibility change how you live the rest of this body?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.42

↗
इदं शरीरं पुरुषस्य मोहजं यथा पृथग्भौतिकमीयते गृहम् । यथौदकै: पार्थिवतैजसैर्जन: कालेन जातो विकृतो विनश्यति ॥ ४२ ॥
idaṁ śarīraṁ puruṣasya mohajaṁ
[idam shareeram purushasya mohajam]
yathā pṛthag bhautikam īyate gṛham
[yathaa prithag bhautikam eeyate griham]
yathaudakaiḥ pārthiva-taijasair janaḥ
[yathaudakaih paarthiva-taijasair janah]
kālena jāto vikṛto vinaśyati
[kaalena jaato vikrito vinashyati]
idam — this śarīram — body puruṣasya — of the conditioned soul moha-jam — born of ignorance yathā — just as pṛthak — separate bhautikam — material īyate — is seen gṛham — a house yathā — just as udakaiḥ — with water pārthiva — with earth taijasaiḥ — and with fire janaḥ — the conditioned soul kālena — in due course of time jātaḥ — born vikṛtaḥ — transformed vinaśyati — is vanquished.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
idaṁ śarīraṁ puruṣasya mohajaṁ
idam
this
śarīram
body
puruṣasya
of the conditioned soul
moha-jam
born of ignorance
yathā pṛthag bhautikam īyate gṛham
yathā
just as
pṛthak
separate
bhautikam
material
īyate
is seen
gṛham
a house
yathaudakaiḥ pārthiva-taijasair janaḥ
yathā
just as
udakaiḥ
with water
pārthiva
with earth
taijasaiḥ
and with fire
janaḥ
the conditioned soul
kālena jāto vikṛto vinaśyati
kālena
in due course of time
jātaḥ
born
vikṛtaḥ
transformed
vinaśyati
is vanquished.
Just as a householder, although different from the identity of his house, thinks his house to be identical with him, so the conditioned soul, due to ignorance, accepts the body to be himself, although the body is actually different from the soul. This body is obtained through a combination of portions of earth, water and fire, and when the earth, water and fire are transformed in the course of time, the body is vanquished. The soul has nothing to do with this creation and dissolution of the body.

We transmigrate from one body to another in bodies that are products of our illusion, but as spirit souls we always exist separately from material, conditional life. The example given here is that a house or car is always different from its owner, but because of attachment the conditioned soul thinks it to be identical with him. A car or house is actually made of material elements; as long as the material elements combine together properly, the car or house exists, and when they are disassembled the house or the car is disassembled. The spirit soul, however, always remains as he is.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The body is produced from bewilderment of the jīva. Paramātmā is different from the body just as the person living in a house is different from the house. The material body made of water, earth and fire is born, matures and dies in time. This verse explained the Lord’s being different. The body is produced out of bewilderment of the jīva. It is different from the Paramātmā situated within it, just a house with walls and doors is different from the person living in the house. The difference is further explained. Just as foam made of water particles, a pot made of clay, and earrings made from fire are produced and then destroyed, the body, produced from atoms of water, earth and fire, is born, develops and then is destroyed. However, this is not so for the ātmā.
A householder identifies with his house though they are wholly different. So we identify with our body, made of earth, water, and fire, even though the soul has nothing to do with its creation or dissolution. Notice the constant slip into mistaken identity.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'house' in your life are you currently mistaking for your self?
  • What simple practice helps you remember you are the resident, not the residence?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.43

↗
यथानलो दारुषु भिन्न ईयते यथानिलो देहगत: पृथक् स्थित: । यथा नभ: सर्वगतं न सज्जते तथा पुमान् सर्वगुणाश्रय: पर: ॥ ४३ ॥
yathānalo dāruṣu bhinna īyate
[yathaanalo daarushu bhinna eeyate]
yathānilo deha-gataḥ pṛthak sthitaḥ
[yathaanilo deha-gatah prithak sthitah]
yathā nabhaḥ sarva-gataṁ na sajjate
[yathaa nabhah sarva-gatam na sajjate]
tathā pumān sarva-guṇāśrayaḥ paraḥ
[tathaa pumaan sarva-gunaashrayah parah]
yathā — just as analaḥ — the fire dāruṣu — in wood bhinnaḥ — separate īyate — is perceived yathā — just as anilaḥ — the air deha-gataḥ — within the body pṛthak — separate sthitaḥ — situated yathā — just as nabhaḥ — the sky sarva-gatam — all-pervading na — not sajjate — mix tathā — similarly pumān — the living entity sarva-guṇa-āśrayaḥ — although now the shelter of the modes of material nature paraḥ — transcendental to material contamination.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathānalo dāruṣu bhinna īyate
yathā
just as
analaḥ
the fire
dāruṣu
in wood
bhinnaḥ
separate
īyate
is perceived
yathānilo deha-gataḥ pṛthak sthitaḥ
yathā
just as
anilaḥ
the air
deha-gataḥ
within the body
pṛthak
separate
sthitaḥ
situated
yathā nabhaḥ sarva-gataṁ na sajjate
yathā
just as
nabhaḥ
the sky
sarva-gatam
all-pervading
na
not
sajjate
mix
tathā pumān sarva-guṇāśrayaḥ paraḥ
tathā
similarly
pumān
the living entity
sarva-guṇa-āśrayaḥ
although now the shelter of the modes of material nature
paraḥ
transcendental to material contamination.
As fire, although situated in wood, is perceived to be different from the wood, as air, although situated within the mouth and nostrils, is perceived to be separate, and as the sky, although all-pervading, never mixes with anything, so the living entity, although now encaged within the material body, of which it is the source, is separate from it.

In Bhagavad-gītā the Supreme Personality of Godhead has explained that the material energy and spiritual energy both emanate from Him. The material energy is described as me bhinnā prakṛtir aṣṭadhā, the eight separated energies of the Lord. But although the eight gross and subtle material energies — namely, earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego — are stated to be bhinnā, separate from the Lord, actually they are not. As fire appears separate from wood and as the air flowing through the nostrils and mouth of the body appear separate from the body, so the Paramātmā, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, appears separate from the living being but is actually separate and not separate simultaneously. This is the philosophy of acintya-bhedābheda-tattva propounded by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. According to the reactions of karma, the living being appears separate from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but actually he is very intimately related with the Lord. Consequently, even though we now seem neglected by the Lord, He is actually always alert to our activities. Under all circumstances, therefore, we should simply depend on the supremacy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and thus revive our intimate relationship with Him. We must depend upon the authority and control of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as fire is perceived to be different from wood, and air within the body is different from the body, so ātmā, situated in the body, is different from it. Just as ether, all-pervading, does not mix with anything, the ātmā, shelter of the body and senses, is different from the body. Examples of being situated in the same place but being different are given. Fire, though situated in wood, is perceived as different from wood because of its power to burn and illuminate. Air, though within the body, is perceived to exist separately in the nostrils. An example is given to show how the ātmā, though situated in the body, does not take on the qualities of the body. Just as ether does not mix with other things, the jīva, though the shelter of body and senses (sarva-guṇa), or, though it takes shelter of them, remains separate. Why do you not become detached from this body of your husband, who died by his karma and was ignored by the Lord?
Fire is in wood but distinct from it; air moves through nostrils but is not the body; sky pervades all yet mingles with nothing. So the living entity, though housed in the body, is separate from it. Closeness is not identity.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are you confusing closeness with identity in your relationships?
  • What aspect of yourself most clearly reveals the 'fire in the wood' — present yet distinct?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.44

↗
सुयज्ञो नन्वयं शेते मूढा यमनुशोचथ । य: श्रोता योऽनुवक्तेह स न द‍ृश्येत कर्हिचित् ॥ ४४ ॥
suyajño nanv ayaṁ śete
[suyajno nanv ayam shete]
mūḍhā yam anuśocatha
[moodhaa yam anushochatha]
yaḥ śrotā yo ’nuvakteha
[yah shrotaa yo ’nuvakteha]
sa na dṛśyeta karhicit
[sa na drishyeta karhichit]
suyajñaḥ — the king named Suyajña nanu — indeed ayam — this śete — lies mūḍhāḥ — O foolish people yam — whom anuśocatha — you cry for yaḥ — he who śrotā — the hearer yaḥ — he who anuvaktā — the speaker iha — in this world saḥ — he na — not dṛśyeta — is visible karhicit — at any time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
suyajño nanv ayaṁ śete
suyajñaḥ
the king named Suyajña
nanu
indeed
ayam
this
śete
lies
mūḍhā yam anuśocatha
mūḍhāḥ
O foolish people
yam
whom
anuśocatha
you cry for
yaḥ śrotā yo ’nuvakteha
yaḥ
he who
śrotā
the hearer
yaḥ
he who
sa na dṛśyeta karhicit
anuvaktā
the speaker
iha
in this world
saḥ
he
na
not
dṛśyeta
is visible
karhicit
at any time.
Yamarāja continued: O lamenters, you are all fools! The person named Suyajña, for whom you lament, is still lying before you and has not gone anywhere. Then what is the cause for your lamentation? Previously he heard you and replied to you, but now, not finding him, you are lamenting. This is contradictory behavior, for you have never actually seen the person within the body who heard you and replied. There is no need for your lamentation, for the body you have always seen is lying here.

This instruction by Yamarāja in the form of a boy is understandable even for a common man. A common man who considers the body the self is certainly comparable to an animal ( yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke … sa eva go-kharaḥ ). But even a common man can understand that after death a person is gone. Although the body is still there, a dead man’s relatives lament that the person has gone away, for a common man sees the body but cannot see the soul. As described in Bhagavad-gītā, dehino ’smin yathā dehe: the soul, the proprietor of the body, is within. After death, when the breath within the nostrils has stopped, one can understand that the person within the body, who was hearing and replying, has now gone. Therefore, in effect, the common man concludes that actually the spirit soul was different from the body and has now gone away. Thus even a common man, coming to his senses, can know that the real person who was within the body and was hearing and replying was never seen. For that which was never seen, what is the need of lamentation?

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O fools! The person named Suyajña, for whom you lament, is still lying before you. He who spoke and heard was not visible at any time. “This king, defeated in battle, now sleeps. How can we ignore him and not show affection?” But his body is still here. “Up until now he would hear and respond to our lamentation.” Even before this time, he could not be seen. What you saw before–the body, you can also see now.
Yamarāja points out that Suyajña's body is still right there — what is missing is the one who heard and replied. Death proves that what mattered was never the body. Every funeral is a confession that we loved the soul all along.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose absence has taught you that you loved the soul, not the body?
  • How does that recognition change how you treat the living in your life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.45

↗
न श्रोता नानुवक्तायं मुख्योऽप्यत्र महानसु: । यस्त्विहेन्द्रियवानात्मा स चान्य: प्राणदेहयो: ॥ ४५ ॥
na śrotā nānuvaktāyaṁ
[na shrotaa naanuvaktaayam]
mukhyo ’py atra mahān asuḥ
[mukhyo ’py atra mahaan asuh]
yas tv ihendriyavān ātmā
[yas tv ihendriyavaan aatmaa]
sa cānyaḥ prāṇa-dehayoḥ
[sa chaanyah praana-dehayoh]
na — not śrotā — the listener na — not anuvaktā — the speaker ayam — this mukhyaḥ — chief api — although atra — in this body mahān — the great asuḥ — life air yaḥ — he who tu — but iha — in this body indriya-vān — possessing all the sense organs ātmā — the soul saḥ — he ca — and anyaḥ — different prāṇa-dehayoḥ — from the life air and the material body.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na śrotā nānuvaktāyaṁ
na
not
śrotā
the listener
na
not
anuvaktā
the speaker
ayam
this
mukhyo ’py atra mahān asuḥ
mukhyaḥ
chief
api
although
atra
in this body
mahān
the great
asuḥ
life air
yas tv ihendriyavān ātmā
yaḥ
he who
tu
but
iha
in this body
indriya-vān
possessing all the sense organs
ātmā
the soul
sa cānyaḥ prāṇa-dehayoḥ
saḥ
he
ca
and
anyaḥ
different
prāṇa-dehayoḥ
from the life air and the material body.
In the body the most important substance is the life air, but that also is neither the listener nor the speaker. Beyond even the life air, the soul also can do nothing, for the Supersoul is actually the director, in cooperation with the individual soul. The Supersoul conducting the activities of the body is different from the body and living force.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead distinctly says in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “I am seated in everyone’s heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness.” Although the ātmā, or soul, is present in every material body ( dehino ’smin yathā dehe ), he is not actually the chief person acting through the senses, mind and so on. The soul can merely act in cooperation with the Supersoul because it is the Supersoul who gives him directions to act or not to act ( mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca ). One cannot act without His sanction, for the Supersoul is upadraṣṭā and anumantā, the witness and sanctioner. One who studies carefully, under the direction of a bona fide spiritual master, can understand the real knowledge that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is actually the conductor of all the activities of the individual soul, and the controller of their results as well. Although the individual soul possesses the indriyas, or senses, he is not actually the proprietor, for the proprietor is the Supersoul. Consequently the Supersoul is called Hṛṣīkeśa, and the individual soul is advised by the direction of the Supersoul to surrender to Him and thus be happy ( sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja ). Thus he can become immortal and be transferred to the spiritual kingdom, where he will achieve the highest success of an eternal, blissful life of knowledge. In conclusion, the individual soul is different from the body, senses, living force and the airs within the body, and above him is the Supersoul, who gives the individual soul all facilities. The individual soul who renders everything to the Supersoul lives very happily within the body.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The main life air, mahat-tattva, is also not the hearer or speaker. The ātmā who possesses the senses, who is different from the life air and body, is the hearer and speaker. “As long as the life air was present, he could hear and speak. When the life air left, he could not do so. Therefore the life air is the hearer and speaker.” That is not so, though the life air is important. Śruti says prāṇo vai mukhyaḥ: the prāṇa is the chief. Even the main life air (mahān), [Note: Sūtrātmā or Mukhya-prāṇa is a deity embodying all jīvas in the subtle state of mahat-tattva, before ahaṅkāra becomes manifest. ] the cause of the activities of all the senses, is not the hearer or speaker because it is unconscious. Who is the hearer and speaker? He who possesses the senses, the jīva, different from the life air, body and senses is the hearer and speaker because he is conscious.
Even the life-air is not the listener or speaker; the soul acts only with the Supersoul's sanction. We are not even the doers we think we are — every breath is sanctioned. Humility before this fact is the start of devotional life.
Reflection Questions
  • What action of yours this week most clearly required, beyond your effort, the Lord's sanction?
  • How would awareness of the Supersoul as witness change a decision you face?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.46

↗
भूतेन्द्रियमनोलिङ्गान् देहानुच्चावचान् विभु: । भजत्युत्सृजति ह्यन्यस्तच्चापि स्वेन तेजसा ॥ ४६ ॥
bhūtendriya-mano-liṅgān
[bhootendriya-mano-lingaan]
dehān uccāvacān vibhuḥ
[dehaan uchchaavachaan vibhuh]
bhajaty utsṛjati hy anyas
[bhajaty utsrijati hy anyas]
tac cāpi svena tejasā
[tach chaapi svena tejasaa]
bhūta — by the five material elements indriya — the ten senses manaḥ — and the mind liṅgān — characterized dehān — gross material bodies ucca-avacān — high class and low class vibhuḥ — the individual soul, which is the lord of the body and senses bhajati — achieves utsṛjati — gives up hi — indeed anyaḥ — being different tat — that ca — also api — indeed svena — by his own tejasā — power of advanced knowledge.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūtendriya-mano-liṅgān
bhūta
by the five material elements
indriya
the ten senses
manaḥ
and the mind
liṅgān
characterized
dehān uccāvacān vibhuḥ
dehān
gross material bodies
ucca-avacān
high class and low class
vibhuḥ
the individual soul, which is the lord of the body and senses
bhajaty utsṛjati hy anyas
bhajati
achieves
utsṛjati
gives up
hi
indeed
anyaḥ
being different
tac cāpi svena tejasā
tat
that
ca
also
api
indeed
svena
by his own
tejasā
power of advanced knowledge.
The five material elements, the ten senses and the mind all combine to form the various parts of the gross and subtle bodies. The living entity comes in contact with his material bodies, whether high or low, and later gives them up by his personal prowess. This strength can be perceived in a living entity’s personal power to possess different types of bodies.

The conditioned soul has knowledge, and if he wants to fully utilize the gross and subtle bodies for his real advancement in life, he can do so. It is therefore said here that by his high intelligence ( svena tejasā ), by the superior power of superior knowledge achieved from the right source — the spiritual master, or ācārya — he can give up his conditional life in a material body and return home, back to Godhead. However, if he wants to keep himself in the darkness of this material world, he can do so. The Lord confirms this as follows in Bhagavad-gītā (9.25) :

yānti deva-vratā devān pitṝn yānti pitṛ-vratāḥ bhūtāni yānti bhūtejyā yānti mad-yājino ’pi mām

“Those who worship the demigods will take birth among the demigods; those who worship ghosts and spirits will take birth among such beings; those who worship ancestors go to the ancestors; and those who worship Me will live with Me.”

The human form of body is valuable. One can use this body to go to the higher planetary systems, to Pitṛloka, or he can remain in this lower planetary system, but if one tries he can also return home, back to Godhead. This prowess is given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead as the Supersoul. Therefore the Lord says, mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaṁ ca: “From Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness.” If one wants to receive real knowledge from the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one can become free from bondage to repeated acceptance of material bodies. If one takes to the devotional service of the Lord and surrenders unto Him, the Lord is prepared to give one directions by which to return home, back to Godhead, but if one foolishly wants to keep himself in darkness, he can continue in a life of material existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The jīva accepts and gives up gross bodies which also have a subtle body composed of mind and senses. In some cases, he gives up the subtle body by knowledge. “The King has gone somewhere. What is he doing?” He accepts and gives up gross bodies in which he attains (bhūta) a subtle body (liṅgam) composed of senses and mind, just as he has accepted and given up the present body. However, by the strength of knowledge gained by good fortune (svena tejasā), he sometimes gives up the subtle body as well.
The five elements, ten senses, and mind combine into bodies high and low; the soul acquires and discards these by its own power and direction. With knowledge from a true ācārya, one can stop choosing more bodies and return home. Right teaching unlocks real freedom.
Reflection Questions
  • What teaching from a real ācārya is currently offering you a way out of repeating patterns?
  • Where do you keep 'choosing more bodies' — fresh entanglements — instead of going home?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.47

↗
यावल्लिङ्गान्वितो ह्यात्मा तावत्कर्मनिबन्धनम् । ततो विपर्यय: क्लेशो मायायोगोऽनुवर्तते ॥ ४७ ॥
yāval liṅgānvito hy ātmā
[yaaval lingaanvito hy aatmaa]
tāvat karma-nibandhanam
[taavat karma-nibandhanam]
tato viparyayaḥ kleśo
[tato viparyayah klesho]
māyā-yogo ’nuvartate
[maayaa-yogo ’nuvartate]
yāvat — as long as liṅga-anvitaḥ — covered by the subtle body hi — indeed ātmā — the soul tāvat — that long karma — of fruitive activities nibandhanam — bondage tataḥ — from that viparyayaḥ — reversal (wrongly thinking the body to be the self) kleśaḥ — misery māyā-yogaḥ — a strong relationship with the external, illusory energy anuvartate — follows.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yāval liṅgānvito hy ātmā
yāvat
as long as
liṅga-anvitaḥ
covered by the subtle body
hi
indeed
ātmā
the soul
tāvat karma-nibandhanam
tāvat
that long
karma
of fruitive activities
nibandhanam
bondage
tato viparyayaḥ kleśo
tataḥ
from that
viparyayaḥ
reversal (wrongly thinking the body to be the self)
kleśaḥ
misery
māyā-yogo ’nuvartate
māyā-yogaḥ
a strong relationship with the external, illusory energy
anuvartate
follows.
As long as the spirit soul is covered by the subtle body, consisting of the mind, intelligence and false ego, he is bound to the results of his fruitive activities. Because of this covering, the spirit soul is connected with the material energy and must accordingly suffer material conditions and reversals, continually, life after life.

The living entity is bound by the subtle body, consisting of the mind, intelligence and false ego. At the time of death, therefore, the position of the mind becomes the cause for the next body. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (8.6) , yaṁ yaṁ vāpi smaran bhāvaṁ tyajaty ante kalevaram: at the time of death the mind sets the criteria for the spirit soul’s being carried to another type of body. If a living being resists the dictation of the mind and engages the mind in the loving service of the Lord, the mind cannot degrade him. The duty of all human beings, therefore, is to keep the mind always engaged at the lotus feet of the Lord ( sa vai manaḥ kṛṣṇa-padāravindayoḥ ). When the mind is engaged at the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, the intelligence is purified, and then the intelligence gets inspiration from the Supersoul ( dadāmi buddhi-yogaṁ tam ). Thus the living entity makes progress toward liberation from material bondage. The individual living soul is subject to the laws of fruitive activity, but the Supersoul, Paramātmā, is not affected by the fruitive activities of the individual soul. As confirmed in the Vedic Upaniṣad, the Paramātmā and the jīvātmā, who are likened to two birds, are sitting in the body. The jīvātmā is enjoying or suffering by eating the fruits of the bodily activities, but the Paramātmā, who is free from such bondage, witnesses and sanctions the activities of the individual soul as the individual soul desires.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As long as the jīva keeps the subtle body, he continues in the bondage of karma. From bondage, arise false identity, misery, and contact with māyā. Only when the jīva gives up the subtle body does he become liberated.
As long as the subtle body — mind, intelligence, false ego — covers the soul, fruitive reactions follow life after life. The mind at the time of death determines the next body. Practice the engagement of mind in Kṛṣṇa now, so the final moment finds it already trained.
Reflection Questions
  • If your dominant thoughts of today became your next body, what would it be?
  • What single shift in mental habit would most change your trajectory?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.48

↗
वितथाभिनिवेशोऽयं यद्गुणेष्वर्थद‍ृग्वच: । यथा मनोरथ: स्वप्न: सर्वमैन्द्रियकं मृषा ॥ ४८ ॥
vitathābhiniveśo ’yaṁ
[vitathaabhinivesho ’yam]
yad guṇeṣv artha-dṛg-vacaḥ
[yad guneshv artha-drig-vachah]
yathā manorathaḥ svapnaḥ
[yathaa manorathah svapnah]
sarvam aindriyakaṁ mṛṣā
[sarvam aindriyakam mrishaa]
vitatha — fruitless abhiniveśaḥ — the conception ayam — this yat — which guṇeṣu — in the modes of material nature artha — as a fact dṛk-vacaḥ — the seeing and talking of yathā — just as manorathaḥ — a mental concoction (daydream) svapnaḥ — a dream sarvam — everything aindriyakam — produced by the senses mṛṣā — false.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vitathābhiniveśo ’yaṁ
vitatha
fruitless
abhiniveśaḥ
the conception
ayam
this
yat
which
yad guṇeṣv artha-dṛg-vacaḥ
guṇeṣu
in the modes of material nature
artha
as a fact
dṛk-vacaḥ
the seeing and talking of
yathā manorathaḥ svapnaḥ
yathā
just as
manorathaḥ
a mental concoction (daydream)
svapnaḥ
a dream
sarvam aindriyakaṁ mṛṣā
sarvam
everything
aindriyakam
produced by the senses
mṛṣā
false.
It is fruitless to see and talk of the material modes of nature and their resultant so-called happiness and distress as if they were factual. When the mind wanders during the day and a man begins to think himself extremely important, or when he dreams at night and sees a beautiful woman enjoying with him, these are merely false dreams. Similarly, the happiness and distress caused by the material senses should be understood to be meaningless.

The happiness and distress derived from the activities of the material senses are not actual happiness and distress. Therefore Bhagavad-gītā speaks of happiness that is transcendental to the material conception of life ( sukham ātyantikaṁ yat tad buddhi-grāhyam atīndriyam ). When our senses are purified of material contamination, they become atīndriya, transcendental senses, and when the transcendental senses are engaged in the service of the master of the senses, Hṛṣīkeśa, one can derive real transcendental pleasure. Whatever distress or happiness we manufacture by mental concoction through the subtle mind has no reality, but is simply a mental concoction. One should therefore not imagine so-called happiness through mental concoction. Rather, the best course is to engage the mind in the service of the Lord, Hṛṣīkeśa, and thus feel real blissful life.

There is a Vedic statement apāma-somam amṛtā abhūma apsarobhir viharāma. With reference to such a conception, one wants to go to the heavenly planets to enjoy with the young girls there and drink soma-rasa. Such imaginary pleasure, however, has no value. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (7.23) , antavat tu phalaṁ teṣāṁ tad bhavaty alpa-medhasām: “Men of small intelligence worship the demigods, and their fruits are limited and temporary.” Even if by fruitive activity or worship of the demigods one is elevated to the higher planetary systems for sense enjoyment, his situation is condemned in Bhagavad-gītā as antavat, perishable. The happiness one enjoys in this way is like the pleasure of embracing a young woman in a dream; for some time it may be pleasing, but actually the basic principle is false. The mental concoctions of happiness and distress in this material world are compared to dreams because of their falseness. All thoughts of obtaining happiness by using the material senses have a false background and therefore have no meaning.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing and speaking about the effects of the guṇas as permanent things are a useless misconception. It is like the objects of daydreams or dreams during sleep. All things perceived by the senses are illusory. Therefore, you should strive for liberation from the bondage of karma. You should not strive for the results of karma such as Svarga, since material happiness and distress are flickering like a dream. This identity is useless (vitatha). Seeing and speaking about the effects of the guṇas, such as happiness, as being permanent things is useless. “We drank soma and became immortal, and enjoyed with Apsarās.” This identity is similar to daydreaming about deriving bliss from sons or wealth, or dreaming about enjoying women or attaining Svarga. This universe perceived by the senses is false.
Sensory happiness and distress are no more real than a dream of a beautiful woman or a vision of one's own greatness during the day. Treating these as factual is the great mistake. Engage the mind in the Lord; the rest is wind.
Reflection Questions
  • Which dream-like happiness or distress is currently dictating your decisions?
  • What would it mean to treat today's mood as a passing dream and act from a deeper place?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.49

↗
अथ नित्यमनित्यं वा नेह शोचन्ति तद्विद: । नान्यथा शक्यते कर्तुं स्वभाव: शोचतामिति ॥ ४९ ॥
atha nityam anityaṁ vā
[atha nityam anityam vaa]
neha śocanti tad-vidaḥ
[neha shochanti tad-vidah]
nānyathā śakyate kartuṁ
[naanyathaa shakyate kartum]
sva-bhāvaḥ śocatām iti
[sva-bhaavah shochataam iti]
atha — therefore nityam — the eternal spirit soul anityam — the temporary material body vā — or na — not iha — in this world śocanti — they lament for tat-vidaḥ — those who are advanced in knowledge of the body and soul na — not anyathā — otherwise śakyate — is able kartum — to do sva-bhāvaḥ — the nature śocatām — of those prone to lamentation iti — thus.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha nityam anityaṁ vā
atha
therefore
nityam
the eternal spirit soul
anityam
the temporary material body
vā
or
neha śocanti tad-vidaḥ
nānyathā śakyate kartuṁ
na
not
iha
in this world
sva-bhāvaḥ śocatām iti
śocanti
they lament for
tat-vidaḥ
those who are advanced in knowledge of the body and soul
na
not
anyathā
otherwise
śakyate
is able
kartum
to do
sva-bhāvaḥ
the nature
śocatām
of those prone to lamentation
iti
thus.
Those who have full knowledge of self-realization, who know very well that the spirit soul is eternal whereas the body is perishable, are not overwhelmed by lamentation. But persons who lack knowledge of self-realization certainly lament. Therefore it is difficult to educate a person in illusion.

According to the mīmāṁsā philosophers, everything is eternal, nitya, and according to the Sāṅkhya philosophers everything is mithyā, or anitya — impermanent. Nonetheless, without real knowledge of ātmā, the soul, such philosophers must be bewildered and must continue to lament as śūdras. Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī therefore said to Parīkṣit Mahārāja:

śrotavyādīni rājendra nṛṇāṁ santi sahasraśaḥ apaśyatām ātma-tattvaṁ gṛheṣu gṛha-medhinām

“Those who are materially engrossed, being blind to knowledge of the ultimate truth, have many subjects for hearing in human society, O Emperor.” ( Bhāg. 2.1.2 ) For ordinary persons engaged in material activities there are many, many subject matters to understand because such persons do not understand self-realization. One must therefore be educated in self-realization so that under any circumstances in life he will remain steady in his vows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some say the world is permanent. Some say it is transient. But they do not lament. The nature of those who lament is to say, “I cannot do anything else except lament.” Mīmāṁsakas say that the world is permanent. Sāṇkhya says the world is temporary but real. “Then we cannot understand the world at all. It is not possible to do anything.” That is the nature of those who lament.
Related verses
Those who know the soul is eternal and the body perishable do not lament. Those without self-realization continue grieving even after teaching. It is hard to educate one who is in illusion — but the effort is the most worthwhile education there is.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom are you trying to educate out of illusion who is not ready to hear?
  • What would shift if you accepted that your own education in this truth is the priority?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.50

↗
लुब्धको विपिने कश्चित्पक्षिणां निर्मितोऽन्तक: । वितत्य जालं विदधे तत्र तत्र प्रलोभयन् ॥ ५० ॥
lubdhako vipine kaścit
[lubdhako vipine kashchit]
pakṣiṇāṁ nirmito ’ntakaḥ
[pakshinaam nirmito ’ntakah]
vitatya jālaṁ vidadhe
[vitatya jaalam vidadhe]
tatra tatra pralobhayan
[tatra tatra pralobhayan]
lubdhakaḥ — hunter vipine — in the forest kaścit — some pakṣiṇām — of birds nirmitaḥ — appointed antakaḥ — killer vitatya — spreading jālam — a net vidadhe — captured tatra tatra — here and there pralobhayan — luring with food.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
lubdhako vipine kaścit
lubdhakaḥ
hunter
vipine
in the forest
kaścit
some
pakṣiṇāṁ nirmito ’ntakaḥ
pakṣiṇām
of birds
nirmitaḥ
appointed
vitatya jālaṁ vidadhe
tatra tatra pralobhayan
antakaḥ
killer
vitatya
spreading
jālam
a net
vidadhe
captured
tatra tatra
here and there
pralobhayan
luring with food.
There was once a hunter who lured birds with food and captured them after spreading a net. He lived as if appointed by death personified as the killer of the birds.

This is another incident from the histories.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Once a hunter, appointed as the killer of the birds by the Lord, spread his net, lured birds with food, and captured them. Though lamentation may be one’s nature, it creates problems. Yamarāja tells a story. The hunter, appointed by the Lord, used to catch (vidadhe) birds. Another version has pralobhanam. He lured them with food.
Yamarāja begins a fresh parable: a hunter set out food and nets to capture birds, as if appointed by death itself. Some forces in our lives are professional captors, dressed as opportunity. Recognize lures.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'food on a net' is currently calling your attention in your life?
  • How well do you recognize when an opportunity is actually a trap?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.51

↗
कुलिङ्गमिथुनं तत्र विचरत्समद‍ृश्यत । तयो: कुलिङ्गी सहसा लुब्धकेन प्रलोभिता ॥ ५१ ॥
kuliṅga-mithunaṁ tatra
[kulinga-mithunam tatra]
vicarat samadṛśyata
[vicharat samadrishyata]
tayoḥ kuliṅgī sahasā
[tayoh kulingee sahasaa]
lubdhakena pralobhitā
[lubdhakena pralobhitaa]
kuliṅga-mithunam — a pair of (male and female) birds known as kuliṅga tatra — there (where the hunter was hunting) vicarat — wandering samadṛśyata — he saw tayoḥ — of the pair kuliṅgī — the female bird sahasā — suddenly lubdhakena — by the hunter pralobhitā — allured.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kuliṅga-mithunaṁ tatra
kuliṅga-mithunam
a pair of (male and female) birds known as kuliṅga
tatra
there (where the hunter was hunting)
vicarat samadṛśyata
vicarat
wandering
samadṛśyata
he saw
tayoḥ kuliṅgī sahasā
tayoḥ
of the pair
kuliṅgī
the female bird
sahasā
suddenly
lubdhakena pralobhitā
lubdhakena
by the hunter
pralobhitā
allured.
While wandering in the forest, the hunter saw a pair of kuliṅga birds. Of the two, the female was captivated by the hunter’s lure.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
While wandering in the forest, the hunter saw a pair of kuliṅga birds. Of the two, the female was lured by the hunter.
Of two kuliṅga birds, the female is captivated by the hunter's lure. One partner is often the first drawn into a snare. The danger to a couple usually enters through one heart first.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is one partner — in your home or community — being lured while the other has not yet noticed?
  • How honest can you and your closest people be about lures that have caught only one of you?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.52

↗
सासज्जत सिचस्तन्‍त्र्यां महिष्य: कालयन्त्रिता । कुलिङ्गस्तां तथापन्नां निरीक्ष्य भृशदु:खित: । स्‍नेहादकल्प: कृपण: कृपणां पर्यदेवयत् ॥ ५२ ॥
sāsajjata sicas tantryāṁ
[saasajjata sichas tantryaam]
mahiṣyaḥ kāla-yantritā
[mahishyah kaala-yantritaa]
kuliṅgas tāṁ tathāpannāṁ
[kulingas taam tathaapannaam]
nirīkṣya bhṛśa-duḥkhitaḥ
[nireekshya bhrisha-duhkhitah]
snehād akalpaḥ kṛpaṇaḥ
[snehaad akalpah kripanah]
kṛpaṇāṁ paryadevayat
[kripanaam paryadevayat]
sā — the female bird asajjata — trapped sicaḥ — of the net tantryām — in the rope mahiṣyaḥ — O queens kāla-yantritā — being forced by time kuliṅgaḥ — the male kuliṅga bird tām — her tathā — in that condition āpannām — captured nirīkṣya — seeing bhṛśa-duḥkhitaḥ — very unhappy snehāt — out of affection akalpaḥ — unable to do anything kṛpaṇaḥ — the poor bird kṛpaṇām — the poor wife paryadevayat — began to lament for.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāsajjata sicas tantryāṁ
sā
the female bird
asajjata
trapped
sicaḥ
of the net
tantryām
in the rope
mahiṣyaḥ kāla-yantritā
mahiṣyaḥ
O queens
kāla-yantritā
being forced by time
kuliṅgas tāṁ tathāpannāṁ
kuliṅgaḥ
the male kuliṅga bird
tām
her
tathā
in that condition
āpannām
captured
nirīkṣya bhṛśa-duḥkhitaḥ
nirīkṣya
seeing
bhṛśa-duḥkhitaḥ
very unhappy
snehād akalpaḥ kṛpaṇaḥ
snehāt
out of affection
akalpaḥ
unable to do anything
kṛpaṇaḥ
the poor bird
kṛpaṇāṁ paryadevayat
kṛpaṇām
the poor wife
paryadevayat
began to lament for.
O queens of Suyajña, the male kuliṅga bird, seeing his wife put into the greatest danger in the grip of Providence, became very unhappy. Because of affection, the poor bird, being unable to release her, began to lament for his wife.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O queens of Suyajña! The female was caught in the ropes of the net. The male kuliṅga bird, seeing his wife captured, became very unhappy. Because of affection, the poor bird, being unable to release her, began to lament for his wife. Sicas tantryām means the ropes of the net. Mahiṣyaḥ means “O queens!”
The male kuliṅga, unable to free his mate, laments in helpless affection. Love that cannot save still pours out, because that is love's nature. But helpless grief alone changes nothing; only awakening to the Lord's larger plan does.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom do you love whose suffering you cannot fix — and what is your grief doing for them?
  • How might your love be transformed by trusting the Lord's plan even while you still feel?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.53

↗
अहो अकरुणो देव: स्त्रियाकरुणया विभु: । कृपणं मामनुशोचन्त्या दीनया किं करिष्यति ॥ ५३ ॥
aho akaruṇo devaḥ
[aho akaruno devah]
striyākaruṇayā vibhuḥ
[striyaakarunayaa vibhuh]
kṛpaṇaṁ mām anuśocantyā
[kripanam maam anushochantyaa]
dīnayā kiṁ kariṣyati
[deenayaa kim karishyati]
aho — alas akaruṇaḥ — most unkind devaḥ — providence striyā — with my wife ākaruṇayā — who is fully compassionate vibhuḥ — the Supreme Lord kṛpaṇam — poor mām — me anuśocantyā — lamenting for dīnayā — poor kim — what kariṣyati — shall do.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho akaruṇo devaḥ
aho
alas
akaruṇaḥ
most unkind
devaḥ
providence
striyākaruṇayā vibhuḥ
striyā
with my wife
ākaruṇayā
who is fully compassionate
vibhuḥ
the Supreme Lord
kṛpaṇaṁ mām anuśocantyā
kṛpaṇam
poor
mām
me
anuśocantyā
lamenting for
dīnayā kiṁ kariṣyati
dīnayā
poor
kim
what
kariṣyati
shall do.
Alas, how merciless is Providence! My wife, unable to be helped by anyone, is in such an awkward position and lamenting for me. What will Providence gain by taking away this poor bird? What will be the profit?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Alas, how merciless is the Lord! Why afflict my poor wife who was kind to me and is lamenting for a wretch like me? Devaḥ means the Lord. My wife was merciful to me (karuṇayā).
The bird wails: how merciless is providence — what does He gain by taking a poor creature like my wife? Suffering breeds the demand that God justify Himself. But the question 'what does He gain?' applies only to a needy God; the true Lord gains nothing.
Reflection Questions
  • What demand for justification have you put to God that assumes He has something to gain?
  • How does the picture change when you remember the Lord needs nothing from you or your loss?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.54

↗
कामं नयतु मां देव: किमर्धेनात्मनो हि मे । दीनेन जीवता दु:खमनेन विधुरायुषा ॥ ५४ ॥
kāmaṁ nayatu māṁ devaḥ
[kaamam nayatu maam devah]
kim ardhenātmano hi me
[kim ardhenaatmano hi me]
dīnena jīvatā duḥkham
[deenena jeevataa duhkham]
anena vidhurāyuṣā
[anena vidhuraayushaa]
kāmam — as He likes nayatu — let Him take away mām — me devaḥ — the Supreme Lord kim — what use ardhena — with half ātmanaḥ — of the body hi — indeed me — my dīnena — poor jīvatā — living duḥkham — in suffering anena — this vidhura-āyuṣā — having a lifetime full of affliction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāmaṁ nayatu māṁ devaḥ
kāmam
as He likes
nayatu
let Him take away
mām
me
devaḥ
the Supreme Lord
kim ardhenātmano hi me
kim
what use
ardhena
with half
ātmanaḥ
of the body
hi
indeed
me
my
dīnena jīvatā duḥkham
dīnena
poor
jīvatā
living
duḥkham
in suffering
anena vidhurāyuṣā
anena
this
vidhura-āyuṣā
having a lifetime full of affliction.
If unkind Providence takes away my wife, who is half my body, why should He not take me also? What is the use of my living with half of my body, bereaved by loss of my wife? What shall I gain in this way?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Let the Lord take me also. What is the use of this miserable half of my body, even if it lives a long time, since it will only experience suffering?
The bird begs to be taken too, calling his wife 'half my body.' Worldly devotion can be so total that the survivor pictures no future. Yet grief that begs for death has not yet met the truth that the loved one was never the body.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose loss have you treated as the loss of 'half your body'?
  • How might that love be reborn when re-grounded in the eternity of the soul?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.55

↗
कथं त्वजातपक्षांस्तान् मातृहीनान् बिभर्म्यहम् । मन्दभाग्या: प्रतीक्षन्ते नीडे मे मातरं प्रजा: ॥ ५५ ॥
kathaṁ tv ajāta-pakṣāṁs tān
[katham tv ajaata-pakshaams taan]
mātṛ-hīnān bibharmy aham
[maatri-heenaan bibharmy aham]
manda-bhāgyāḥ pratīkṣante
[manda-bhaagyaah prateekshante]
nīḍe me mātaraṁ prajāḥ
[neede me maataram prajaah]
katham — how tu — but ajāta-pakṣān — who have not grown wings to fly tān — them mātṛ-hīnān — bereft of their mother bibharmi — shall maintain aham — I manda-bhāgyāḥ — very unfortunate pratīkṣante — they await nīḍe — in the nest me — my mātaram — their mother prajāḥ — baby birds.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kathaṁ tv ajāta-pakṣāṁs tān
katham
how
tu
but
ajāta-pakṣān
who have not grown wings to fly
tān
them
mātṛ-hīnān bibharmy aham
mātṛ-hīnān
bereft of their mother
bibharmi
shall maintain
aham
I
manda-bhāgyāḥ pratīkṣante
manda-bhāgyāḥ
very unfortunate
pratīkṣante
they await
nīḍe me mātaraṁ prajāḥ
nīḍe
in the nest
me
my
mātaram
their mother
prajāḥ
baby birds.
The unfortunate baby birds, bereft of their mother, are waiting in the nest for her to feed them. They are still very small and have not yet grown their wings. How shall I be able to maintain them?

The bird is lamenting for the mother of his children because the mother naturally maintains and cares for the children. Yamarāja, however, in the guise of a small boy, has already explained that although his mother left him uncared for and wandering in the forest, the tigers and other ferocious animals had not eaten him. The real fact is that if the Supreme Personality of Godhead protects one, even though one be motherless and fatherless, one can be maintained by the good will of the Lord. Otherwise, if the Supreme Lord does not give one protection, one must suffer in spite of the presence of his father and mother. Another example is that sometimes a patient dies in spite of a good physician and good medicine. Thus without the protection of the Lord one cannot live, with or without parents.

Another point in this verse is that fathers and mothers have protective feelings for their children even in bird and beast society, not to speak of human society. Kali-yuga, however, is so degraded that a father and mother even kill their children in the womb on the plea of their scientific knowledge that within the womb the child has no life. Prestigious medical practitioners give this opinion, and therefore the father and mother of this day kill their children within the womb. How degraded human society has become! Their scientific knowledge is so advanced that they think that within the egg and the embryo there is no life. Now these so-called scientists are receiving Nobel Prizes for advancing the theory of chemical evolution. But if chemical combinations are the source of life, why don’t the scientists manufacture something like an egg through chemistry and put it in an incubator so that a chicken will come out? What is their answer? With their scientific knowledge they are unable to create even an egg. Such scientists are described in Bhagavad-gītā as māyayāpahṛta-jñānāḥ, fools whose real knowledge has been taken away. They are not men of knowledge, but they pose as scientists and philosophers, although their so-called theoretical knowledge cannot produce practical results.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How will I maintain the baby birds without wings, in the absence of their mother? I am unfortunate. They are waiting form their mother in the nest.
The bird worries: how will I feed the unfledged chicks now that their mother is gone? Real responsibilities follow loss, and the mind reaches for them in panic. The Lord protects even orphans — as the small Yamarāja-boy has already shown.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'unfledged chicks' in your life are causing panic about a coming loss?
  • Where has the Lord's protection of vulnerable ones in your past quietly proven itself?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.56

↗
एवं कुलिङ्गं विलपन्तमारात् प्रियावियोगातुरमश्रुकण्ठम् । स एव तं शाकुनिक: शरेण विव्याध कालप्रहितो विलीन: ॥ ५६ ॥
evaṁ kuliṅgaṁ vilapantam ārāt
[evam kulingam vilapantam aaraat]
priyā-viyogāturam aśru-kaṇṭham
[priyaa-viyogaaturam ashru-kantham]
sa eva taṁ śākunikaḥ śareṇa
[sa eva tam shaakunikah sharena]
vivyādha kāla-prahito vilīnaḥ
[vivyaadha kaala-prahito vileenah]
evam — thus kuliṅgam — the bird vilapantam — while lamenting ārāt — from a distance priyā-viyoga — because of the loss of his wife āturam — very aggrieved aśru-kaṇṭham — with tears in the eyes saḥ — he (that hunter) eva — indeed tam — him (the male bird) śākunikaḥ — who could kill even a vulture śareṇa — by an arrow vivyādha — pierced kāla-prahitaḥ — being moved by time vilīnaḥ — hidden.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ kuliṅgaṁ vilapantam ārāt
evam
thus
kuliṅgam
the bird
vilapantam
while lamenting
ārāt
from a distance
priyā-viyogāturam aśru-kaṇṭham
priyā-viyoga
because of the loss of his wife
āturam
very aggrieved
aśru-kaṇṭham
with tears in the eyes
sa eva taṁ śākunikaḥ śareṇa
saḥ
he (that hunter)
eva
indeed
tam
him (the male bird)
śākunikaḥ
who could kill even a vulture
śareṇa
by an arrow
vivyādha kāla-prahito vilīnaḥ
vivyādha
pierced
kāla-prahitaḥ
being moved by time
vilīnaḥ
hidden.
Because of the loss of his wife, the kuliṅga bird lamented with tears in his eyes. Meanwhile, following the dictations of mature time, the hunter, who was very carefully hidden in the distance, released his arrow, which pierced the body of the kuliṅga bird and killed him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The hiding hunter, inspired by time, pierced with his arrow that lamenting bird, grieved by separation from his wife, with tears in its eyes.
While the male kuliṅga laments, the patient hunter releases his arrow and kills him too. Excessive grief blinds us to the arrow already taking aim. Mourning that abandons vigilance leaves us doubly exposed.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has grief left you blind to a real danger now approaching?
  • How can mourning and watchfulness coexist in you?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.57

↗
एवं यूयमपश्यन्त्य आत्मापायमबुद्धय: । नैनं प्राप्स्यथ शोचन्त्य: पतिं वर्षशतैरपि ॥ ५७ ॥
evaṁ yūyam apaśyantya
[evam yooyam apashyantya]
ātmāpāyam abuddhayaḥ
[aatmaapaayam abuddhayah]
nainaṁ prāpsyatha śocantyaḥ
[nainam praapsyatha shochantyah]
patiṁ varṣa-śatair api
[patim varsha-shatair api]
evam — thus yūyam — you apaśyantyaḥ — not seeing ātma-apāyam — own death abuddhayaḥ — O ignorant ones na — not enam — him prāpsyatha — you will obtain śocantyaḥ — lamenting for patim — your husband varṣa-śataiḥ — for a hundred years api — even.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ yūyam apaśyantya
evam
thus
yūyam
you
apaśyantyaḥ
not seeing
ātmāpāyam abuddhayaḥ
ātma-apāyam
own death
abuddhayaḥ
O ignorant ones
nainaṁ prāpsyatha śocantyaḥ
na
not
enam
him
prāpsyatha
you will obtain
śocantyaḥ
lamenting for
patiṁ varṣa-śatair api
patim
your husband
varṣa-śataiḥ
for a hundred years
api
even.
Thus Yamarāja, in the guise of a small boy, told all the queens: You are all so foolish that you lament but do not see your own death. Afflicted by a poor fund of knowledge, you do not know that even if you lament for your dead husband for hundreds of years, you will never get him back alive, and in the meantime your lives will be finished.

Yamarāja once asked Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, “What is the most wonderful thing within this world?” Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira replied ( Mahābhārata, Vana-parva 313.116):

ahany ahani bhūtāni gacchantīha yamālayam śeṣāḥ sthāvaram icchanti kim āścaryam ataḥ paraṁ

Hundreds and thousands of living entities meet death at every moment, but a foolish living being nonetheless thinks himself deathless and does not prepare for death. This is the most wonderful thing in this world. Everyone has to die because everyone is fully under the control of material nature, yet everyone thinks that he is independent, that whatever he likes he can do, that he will never meet death but live forever, and so on. So-called scientists are making various plans by which living entities in the future can live forever, but while they are thus pursuing such scientific knowledge, Yamarāja, in due course of time, will take them away from their business of so-called research.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Ignorant women! Simply lamenting for your husband for a hundred years, while not seeing your own death, you will not regain him. Ātmāpāyam means “one’s own death.”
Yamarāja-as-boy tells the queens: you lament without seeing your own death. Hundreds of years of grief will not bring him back, and meanwhile your life will be over. The most wonderful thing in this world is that everyone dies yet no one prepares.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of your finite life are you currently spending on irretrievable grief?
  • What would 'preparing for your own death' actually look like as a weekly practice?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.58

↗
श्रीहिरण्यकशिपुरुवाच बाल एवं प्रवदति सर्वे विस्मितचेतस: । ज्ञातयो मेनिरे सर्वमनित्यमयथोत्थितम् ॥ ५८ ॥
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipur uvāca
[shree-hiranyakashipur uvaacha]
bāla evaṁ pravadati
[baala evam pravadati]
sarve vismita-cetasaḥ
[sarve vismita-chetasah]
jñātayo menire sarvam
[jnaatayo menire sarvam]
anityam ayathotthitam
[anityam ayathotthitam]
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipuḥ uvāca — Śrī Hiraṇyakaśipu said bāle — while Yamarāja in the form of a boy evam — thus pravadati — was speaking very philosophically sarve — all vismita — struck with wonder cetasaḥ — their hearts jñātayaḥ — the relatives menire — they thought sarvam — everything material anityam — temporary ayathā-utthitam — arisen from temporary phenomena.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipur uvāca
śrī-hiraṇyakaśipuḥ uvāca
Śrī Hiraṇyakaśipu said
bāla evaṁ pravadati
bāle
while Yamarāja in the form of a boy
evam
thus
pravadati
was speaking very philosophically
sarve vismita-cetasaḥ
sarve
all
vismita
struck with wonder
cetasaḥ
their hearts
jñātayo menire sarvam
jñātayaḥ
the relatives
menire
they thought
sarvam
everything material
anityam ayathotthitam
anityam
temporary
ayathā-utthitam
arisen from temporary phenomena.
Hiraṇyakaśipu said: While Yamarāja, in the form of a small boy, was instructing all the relatives surrounding the dead body of Suyajña, everyone was struck with wonder by his philosophical words. They could understand that everything material is temporary, not continuing to exist.

This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (2.18) . Antavanta ime dehā nityasyoktāḥ śarīriṇaḥ: the body is perishable, but the soul within the body is imperishable. Therefore the duty of those advanced in knowledge in human society is to study the constitutional position of the imperishable soul and not waste the valuable time of human life in merely maintaining the body and not considering life’s real responsibility. Every human being should try to understand how the spirit soul can be happy and where he can attain an eternal, blissful life of knowledge. Human beings are meant to study these subject matters, not to be absorbed in caring for the temporary body, which is sure to change. No one knows whether he will receive a human body again; there is no guarantee, for according to one’s work one may get any body, from that of a demigod to that of a dog. In this regard, Śrīla Madhvācārya comments:

ahaṁ mamābhimānādi- tva-yathottham anityakam mahadādi yathotthaṁ ca nityā cāpi yathotthitā

asvatantraiva prakṛtiḥ sva-tantro nitya eva ca yathārtha-bhūtaś ca para eka eva janārdanaḥ

Only Janārdana, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is ever existing, but His creation, the material world, is temporary. Therefore everyone who is captivated by the material energy and absorbed in thinking “I am this body, and everything belonging to this body is mine” is in illusion. One should think only of being eternally a part of Janārdana, and one’s endeavor in this material world, especially in this human form of life, should be to attain the association of Janārdana by going back home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hiraṇyakaśipu said: While Yamarāja in the form of a small boy was speaking, all the relatives, struck with wonder, began to consider that the world is temporary and that it will disappear just as it arose. They thought this world is temporary, because just as it has arisen somehow, it will not remain.
Hiraṇyakaśipu notes that everyone was struck with wonder by the boy's philosophy and understood that material things do not endure. Truth is recognizable even when delivered by a child. Wonder is the first step in admitting what you already half-knew.
Reflection Questions
  • What truth has been told to you that you only half-acknowledged out of pride?
  • Where could childlike wonder do more for you than expert analysis?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.59

↗
यम एतदुपाख्याय तत्रैवान्तरधीयत । ज्ञातयोऽहि सुयज्ञस्य चक्रुर्यत्साम्परायिकम् ॥ ५९ ॥
yama etad upākhyāya
[yama etad upaakhyaaya]
tatraivāntaradhīyata
[tatraivaantaradheeyata]
jñātayo hi suyajñasya
[jnaatayo hi suyajnasya]
cakrur yat sāmparāyikam
[chakrur yat saamparaayikam]
yamaḥ — Yamarāja in the form of a boy etat — this upākhyāya — instructing tatra — there eva — indeed antaradhīyata — disappeared jñātayaḥ — the relatives hi — indeed suyajñasya — of King Suyajña cakruḥ — performed yat — which is sāmparāyikam — the funeral ceremony.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yama etad upākhyāya
yamaḥ
Yamarāja in the form of a boy
etat
this
upākhyāya
instructing
tatraivāntaradhīyata
tatra
there
eva
indeed
antaradhīyata
disappeared
jñātayo hi suyajñasya
jñātayaḥ
the relatives
hi
indeed
suyajñasya
of King Suyajña
cakrur yat sāmparāyikam
cakruḥ
performed
yat
which is
sāmparāyikam
the funeral ceremony.
After instructing all the foolish relatives of Suyajña, Yamarāja, in the form of a boy, disappeared from their vision. Then the relatives of King Suyajña performed the ritualistic funeral ceremonies.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After instructing all the foolish relatives of Suyajña, Yamarāja disappeared. Then the relatives of King Suyajña performed the funeral rites.
After teaching, Yamarāja-as-boy vanishes, and the relatives finally perform the funeral rites. Wisdom often arrives, delivers its message, and disappears — leaving us to do the actual work. Receive the teaching, then act.
Reflection Questions
  • What recent teaching have you received that you have not yet acted on?
  • Where are you waiting for more guidance instead of doing what you already know?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.60

↗
अत: शोचत मा यूयं परं चात्मानमेव वा । क आत्मा क: परो वात्र स्वीय: पारक्य एव वा । स्वपराभिनिवेशेन विनाज्ञानेन देहिनाम् ॥ ६० ॥
ataḥ śocata mā yūyaṁ
[atah shochata maa yooyam]
paraṁ cātmānam eva vā
[param chaatmaanam eva vaa]
ka ātmā kaḥ paro vātra
[ka aatmaa kah paro vaatra]
svīyaḥ pārakya eva vā
[sveeyah paarakya eva vaa]
sva-parābhiniveśena
[sva-paraabhiniveshena]
vinājñānena dehinām
[vinaajnaanena dehinaam]
ataḥ — therefore śocata — lament for mā — do not yūyam — all of you param — another ca — and ātmānam — yourself eva — certainly vā — or kaḥ — who ātmā — self kaḥ — who paraḥ — other vā — or atra — in this material world svīyaḥ — one’s own pārakyaḥ — for others eva — indeed vā — or sva-para-abhiniveśena — consisting of absorption in the bodily concept of oneself and others vinā — besides ajñānena — the lack of knowledge dehinām — of all the embodied living entities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ataḥ śocata mā yūyaṁ
ataḥ
therefore
śocata
lament for
mā
do not
yūyam
all of you
paraṁ cātmānam eva vā
param
another
ca
and
ātmānam
yourself
eva
certainly
vā
or
ka ātmā kaḥ paro vātra
kaḥ
who
ātmā
self
kaḥ
who
paraḥ
other
vā
or
atra
in this material world
svīyaḥ pārakya eva vā
svīyaḥ
one’s own
pārakyaḥ
for others
eva
indeed
vā
or
sva-parābhiniveśena
sva-para-abhiniveśena
consisting of absorption in the bodily concept of oneself and others
vinājñānena dehinām
vinā
besides
ajñānena
the lack of knowledge
dehinām
of all the embodied living entities.
Therefore none of you should be aggrieved for the loss of the body — whether your own or those of others. Only in ignorance does one make bodily distinctions, thinking “Who am I? Who are the others? What is mine? What is for others?”

In this material world, the conception of self-preservation is the first law of nature. According to this conception, one should be interested in his personal safety and should then consider society, friendship, love, nationality, community and so on, which have all developed because of the bodily conception of life and a lack of knowledge of the spirit soul. This is called ajñāna. As long as human society is in darkness and ignorance, men will continue to make huge arrangements in the bodily conception of life. This is described by Prahlāda Mahārāja as bharam. In the materialistic conception, modern civilization makes enormous arrangements for huge roads, houses, mills and factories, and this is man’s conception of the advancement of civilization. People do not know, however, that at any time they themselves may be kicked out of the scene and forced to accept bodies that have nothing to do with these enormous houses, palaces, roads and automobiles. Therefore when Arjuna was thinking in terms of his bodily relationships with his kinsmen, Kṛṣṇa immediately chastised him, saying, kutas tvā kaśmalam idaṁ viṣame samupasthitam anārya-juṣṭam: “This bodily conception of life is befitting the anāryas, the non-Āryans, who are not advanced in knowledge.” An Āryan civilization is a civilization advanced in spiritual knowledge. Not merely by stamping oneself an Āryan does one become an Āryan. To keep oneself in the deepest darkness concerning spiritual knowledge and at the same time claim to be an Āryan is a non-Āryan position. In this connection, Śrīla Madhvācārya quotes as follows from the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa:

ka ātmā kaḥ para iti dehādy-apekṣayā

na hi dehādir ātmā syān na ca śatrur udīritaḥ ato daihika-vṛddhau vā kṣaye vā kiṁ prayojanam

yas tu deha-gato jīvaḥ sa hi nāśaṁ na gacchati tataḥ śatru-vivṛddhau ca sva-nāśe śocanaṁ kutaḥ

dehādi-vyatiriktau tu jīveśau pratijānatā ata ātma-vivṛddhis tu vāsudeve ratiḥ sthirā śatru-nāśas tathājñāna- nāśo nānyaḥ kathañcana

The purport is that as long as we are in this human form of body, our duty is to understand the soul within the body. The body is not the self; we are different from the body, and therefore there is no question of friends, enemies or responsibilities in terms of the bodily conception of life. One should not be very anxious about the body’s changing from childhood to boyhood, from boyhood to old age and then to apparent annihilation. Rather, one should be very seriously concerned about the soul within the body and how to release the soul from the material clutches. The living entity within the body is never annihilated; therefore one should surely know that whether one has many friends or many enemies, his friends cannot help him, and his enemies cannot do him any harm. One should know that he is a spirit soul ( ahaṁ brahmāsmi ) and that the constitutional position of the soul is unaffected by the changes of the body. In all circumstances, everyone, as a spirit soul, must be a devotee of Lord Viṣṇu and should not be concerned with bodily relationships, whether with friends or with enemies. One should know that neither we ourselves nor our enemies in the bodily conception of life are ever killed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore none of you should be aggrieved for your or anyone’s body. By identifying the self and the other, which arises only from ignorance, the living entities thinking “Who am I? Who is he? What is mine? What is his?” By identifying self and other, which is only because of ignorance, the living entities think, “Who am I? Who is he?”
Hiraṇyakaśipu concludes: do not grieve for bodies, your own or others'. The questions 'who am I, who are others, what is mine, what is theirs?' arise only from ignorance. Even a demon king can voice this truth without living it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you voice spiritual truths you do not actually live?
  • Which question — 'who am I?' or 'what is mine?' — is most pressing for you now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.61

↗
श्रीनारद उवाच इति दैत्यपतेर्वाक्यं दितिराकर्ण्य सस्‍नुषा । पुत्रशोकं क्षणात्त्यक्त्वा तत्त्वे चित्तमधारयत् ॥ ६१ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
iti daitya-pater vākyaṁ
[iti daitya-pater vaakyam]
ditir ākarṇya sasnuṣā
[ditir aakarnya sasnushaa]
putra-śokaṁ kṣaṇāt tyaktvā
[putra-shokam kshanaat tyaktvaa]
tattve cittam adhārayat
[tattve chittam adhaarayat]
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada Muni said iti — thus daitya-pateḥ — of the King of the demons vākyam — the speech ditiḥ — Diti, the mother of Hiraṇyakaśipu and Hiraṇyākṣa ākarṇya — hearing sa-snuṣā — with the wife of Hiraṇyākṣa putra-śokam — the great bereavement for her son, Hiraṇyākṣa kṣaṇāt — immediately tyaktvā — giving up tattve — in the real philosophy of life cittam — heart adhārayat — engaged.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada Muni said
iti daitya-pater vākyaṁ
iti
thus
daitya-pateḥ
of the King of the demons
vākyam
the speech
ditir ākarṇya sasnuṣā
ditiḥ
Diti, the mother of Hiraṇyakaśipu and Hiraṇyākṣa
ākarṇya
hearing
sa-snuṣā
with the wife of Hiraṇyākṣa
putra-śokaṁ kṣaṇāt tyaktvā
putra-śokam
the great bereavement for her son, Hiraṇyākṣa
kṣaṇāt
immediately
tyaktvā
giving up
tattve cittam adhārayat
tattve
in the real philosophy of life
cittam
heart
adhārayat
engaged.
Śrī Nārada Muni continued: Diti, the mother of Hiraṇyakaśipu and Hiraṇyākṣa, heard the instructions of Hiraṇyakaśipu along with her daughter-in-law, Ruṣābhānu, Hiraṇyākṣa’s wife. She then forgot her grief over her son’s death and thus engaged her mind and attention in understanding the real philosophy of life.

When a relative dies one certainly becomes very much interested in philosophy, but when the funeral ceremony is over one again becomes attentive to materialism. Even Daityas, who are materialistic persons, sometimes think of philosophy when some relative meets death. The technical term for this attitude of the materialistic person is śmaśāna-vairāgya, or detachment in a cemetery or place of cremation. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā, four classes of men receive an understanding of spiritual life and God — ārta (the distressed), jijñāsu (the inquisitive), arthārthī (one who desires material gains) and jñānī (one who is searching for knowledge). Especially when one is very much distressed by material conditions, one becomes interested in God. Therefore Kuntīdevī said in her prayers to Kṛṣṇa that she preferred distress to a happy mood of life. In the material world, one who is happy forgets Kṛṣṇa, or God, but sometimes, if one is actually pious but in distress, he remembers Kṛṣṇa. Queen Kuntīdevī therefore preferred distress because it is an opportunity for remembering Kṛṣṇa. When Kṛṣṇa was leaving Kuntīdevī for His own country, Kuntīdevī regretfully said that she was better off in distress because Kṛṣṇa was always present, whereas now that the Pāṇḍavas were situated in their kingdom, Kṛṣṇa was going away. For a devotee, distress is an opportunity to remember the Supreme Personality of Godhead constantly.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Seventh Canto, Second Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Hiraṇyakaśipu, King of the Demons.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Diti, hearing the instructions of Hiraṇyakaśipu along with her daughter-in-law, Ruṣābhānu, Hiraṇyākṣa's wife, immediately gave up her grief over her son's death and thus engaged her mind in understanding the truth. Thus ends the commentary on the Second Chapter of the Seventh Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Three Hiraṇyakaśipu Meets Brahmā
Diti and Ruṣābhānu, hearing Hiraṇyakaśipu, set aside grief and turn to philosophy. Grief at a death often opens a brief window for real inquiry — śmaśāna-vairāgya. The challenge is to extend that window past the funeral.
Reflection Questions
  • When was the last time grief opened a real spiritual window in you — and what did you do with it?
  • How could you keep that window open beyond the immediate loss?
📝 My note