FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.2.60

अत: शोचत मा यूयं परं चात्मानमेव वा । क आत्मा क: परो वात्र स्वीय: पारक्य एव वा । स्वपराभिनिवेशेन विनाज्ञानेन देहिनाम् ॥ ६० ॥
ataḥ śocata mā yūyaṁ
[atah shochata maa yooyam]
paraṁ cātmānam eva vā
[param chaatmaanam eva vaa]
ka ātmā kaḥ paro vātra
[ka aatmaa kah paro vaatra]
svīyaḥ pārakya eva vā
[sveeyah paarakya eva vaa]
sva-parābhiniveśena
[sva-paraabhiniveshena]
vinājñānena dehinām
[vinaajnaanena dehinaam]
ataḥ — therefore śocata — lament for mā — do not yūyam — all of you param — another ca — and ātmānam — yourself eva — certainly vā — or kaḥ — who ātmā — self kaḥ — who paraḥ — other vā — or atra — in this material world svīyaḥ — one’s own pārakyaḥ — for others eva — indeed vā — or sva-para-abhiniveśena — consisting of absorption in the bodily concept of oneself and others vinā — besides ajñānena — the lack of knowledge dehinām — of all the embodied living entities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ataḥ śocata mā yūyaṁ
ataḥ
therefore
śocata
lament for
mā
do not
yūyam
all of you
paraṁ cātmānam eva vā
param
another
ca
and
ātmānam
yourself
eva
certainly
vā
or
ka ātmā kaḥ paro vātra
kaḥ
who
ātmā
self
kaḥ
who
paraḥ
other
vā
or
atra
in this material world
svīyaḥ pārakya eva vā
svīyaḥ
one’s own
pārakyaḥ
for others
eva
indeed
vā
or
sva-parābhiniveśena
sva-para-abhiniveśena
consisting of absorption in the bodily concept of oneself and others
vinājñānena dehinām
vinā
besides
ajñānena
the lack of knowledge
dehinām
of all the embodied living entities.
Therefore none of you should be aggrieved for the loss of the body — whether your own or those of others. Only in ignorance does one make bodily distinctions, thinking “Who am I? Who are the others? What is mine? What is for others?”

In this material world, the conception of self-preservation is the first law of nature. According to this conception, one should be interested in his personal safety and should then consider society, friendship, love, nationality, community and so on, which have all developed because of the bodily conception of life and a lack of knowledge of the spirit soul. This is called ajñāna. As long as human society is in darkness and ignorance, men will continue to make huge arrangements in the bodily conception of life. This is described by Prahlāda Mahārāja as bharam. In the materialistic conception, modern civilization makes enormous arrangements for huge roads, houses, mills and factories, and this is man’s conception of the advancement of civilization. People do not know, however, that at any time they themselves may be kicked out of the scene and forced to accept bodies that have nothing to do with these enormous houses, palaces, roads and automobiles. Therefore when Arjuna was thinking in terms of his bodily relationships with his kinsmen, Kṛṣṇa immediately chastised him, saying, kutas tvā kaśmalam idaṁ viṣame samupasthitam anārya-juṣṭam: “This bodily conception of life is befitting the anāryas, the non-Āryans, who are not advanced in knowledge.” An Āryan civilization is a civilization advanced in spiritual knowledge. Not merely by stamping oneself an Āryan does one become an Āryan. To keep oneself in the deepest darkness concerning spiritual knowledge and at the same time claim to be an Āryan is a non-Āryan position. In this connection, Śrīla Madhvācārya quotes as follows from the Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa:

ka ātmā kaḥ para iti dehādy-apekṣayā

na hi dehādir ātmā syān na ca śatrur udīritaḥ ato daihika-vṛddhau vā kṣaye vā kiṁ prayojanam

yas tu deha-gato jīvaḥ sa hi nāśaṁ na gacchati tataḥ śatru-vivṛddhau ca sva-nāśe śocanaṁ kutaḥ

dehādi-vyatiriktau tu jīveśau pratijānatā ata ātma-vivṛddhis tu vāsudeve ratiḥ sthirā śatru-nāśas tathājñāna- nāśo nānyaḥ kathañcana

The purport is that as long as we are in this human form of body, our duty is to understand the soul within the body. The body is not the self; we are different from the body, and therefore there is no question of friends, enemies or responsibilities in terms of the bodily conception of life. One should not be very anxious about the body’s changing from childhood to boyhood, from boyhood to old age and then to apparent annihilation. Rather, one should be very seriously concerned about the soul within the body and how to release the soul from the material clutches. The living entity within the body is never annihilated; therefore one should surely know that whether one has many friends or many enemies, his friends cannot help him, and his enemies cannot do him any harm. One should know that he is a spirit soul ( ahaṁ brahmāsmi ) and that the constitutional position of the soul is unaffected by the changes of the body. In all circumstances, everyone, as a spirit soul, must be a devotee of Lord Viṣṇu and should not be concerned with bodily relationships, whether with friends or with enemies. One should know that neither we ourselves nor our enemies in the bodily conception of life are ever killed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore none of you should be aggrieved for your or anyone’s body. By identifying the self and the other, which arises only from ignorance, the living entities thinking “Who am I? Who is he? What is mine? What is his?” By identifying self and other, which is only because of ignorance, the living entities think, “Who am I? Who is he?”
Hiraṇyakaśipu concludes: do not grieve for bodies, your own or others'. The questions 'who am I, who are others, what is mine, what is theirs?' arise only from ignorance. Even a demon king can voice this truth without living it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you voice spiritual truths you do not actually live?
  • Which question — 'who am I?' or 'what is mine?' — is most pressing for you now?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 2