FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

6.15 · The Saints Nārada and Aṅgirā Instruct King Citraketu

22 verses · 🖨 Class prep
C Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15526 chars)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

C - Chitraketu (14-19)

C - Chitraketu (14-19) How could a demon like Vritrasura have such glorious devotional qualities? In answer, Sukadeva Goswami explained his previous birth as Chitraketu, during which he had great devotion for Lord Sankarsana. Chitraketu became enlightened through a rollercoaster of events – first he was childless (despite having 10 million wives), then his newborn child abruptly died and then the son reappeared and taught him the harsh realities of life. Later, when Chitraketu offended Parvati, she cursed him to become a demon in his next life. Chitraketu humbly accepted his destiny, seeing all occurrences as the Lord’s mercy.

Previous Testing Pure Devotion Next Chitraketu’s Lamentation Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Cursed

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Cursed Chapter 17 Along with seeing the Lord, Chitraketu was also benedicted with rulership over the Vidyadhara planet. As he enjoyed in that realm, travelling from place-toplace, he once encountered Lord Siva publicly embracing Parvati, surrounded by an august assembly of Siddhas, Caranas and great sages. Chitraketu was astonished by the sight and laughed loudly, much to the disapproval of Parvati. There was no offensive intention since Chitraketu was simply exhibiting his amazement at Lord Siva’s aloofness. Nevertheless, Parvati, entirely unimpressed by his reaction, cursed him to become a demon. Chitraketu humbly accepted it without protest. Devotees, Siva said, never fear any condition of life – heaven, hell or liberation are all the same since their only aspiration is to serve the Lord. Chitraketu thus became the ‘demon’ Vritrasura in his next life.

Previous Chitraketu Enlightened Next Diti, Indra and the Maruts Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu Enlightened

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu Enlightened Chapter 15, 16 The two sages instructed Chitraketu in the harsh realities of life; all relationships of this world are temporary, and the material designations we assume are ultimately imaginary. The illuminating knowledge empowered Chitraketu to gain a broader perspective. Being eager for more, Narada guided Chitraketu in cultivating an internal detachment and gave him a mantra to chant. Then, by his mystic potency, Narada empowered the child to speak words of wisdom which further highlighted the transitory nature of everything in this world. The funeral ceremony was performed and the envious queens were so ashamed of their conduct that they gave up the aspiration to have children. The sages departed and Chitraketu dedicated himself to reciting the mantra given to him by Narada. Within days he was able to have the direct vision of Lord Sesa, and he overflowed with gratitude. Pleased by his prayers, the Supreme Lord explained further knowledge of Himself to Chitraketu.

Previous Chitraketu’s Lamentation Next Chitraketu Cursed Last updated 1 year ago

Chitraketu’s Lamentation

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Chitraketu’s Lamentation Chapter 14 When Maharaja Pariksit enquired how a demon could possess such exalted consciousness, Sukadeva Goswami described Vritrasura’s previous birth as Chitraketu. Despite marrying ten million wives, Chitraketu had no children. When the great sage Angira Rishi visited, Chitraketu warmly received him. He frankly expressed his dissatisfaction to the sage, who mercifully arranged for his first wife, Krtadyuti, to have a son. There was, however, a caveat – he predicted the child would bring both happiness ( harsa ) and lamentation ( soka ). Upon the birth of this son, Chitraketu and all the citizens were overjoyed. His dream had finally been fulfilled! The other wives, however, didn’t share that joy, feeling neglected and sidelined by their husband. Clouded by envy and overcome by selfishness, they administered poison to the child and mercilessly killed him. Krtadyuti fainted in shock, the inhabitants of the palace were in tears and Chitraketu practically lost all consciousness! The mother condemned the cruel acts of providence and begged her child to wake up, but it was futile. Understanding their pain, the sages Narada and Angira arrived on the scene to offer enlightening words.

Previous C - Chitraketu (14-19) Next Chitraketu Enlightened Last updated 1 year ago

Diti, Indra and the Maruts

C - Chitraketu (14-19) Diti, Indra and the Maruts Chapter 18, 19 Sukadeva Goswami continued describing the descendants of Daksa’s daughters, particularly Diti (mother of the demons) and Aditi (mother of the demigods). Those offspring became known as the Daityas and Adityas respectively. Diti had a grudge against Indra since Vishnu had appeared to save him by killing her sons, Hiranyaksa and Hiranyakasipu. Angered, she now desired another son who would kill Indra. Through her womanly charm she conquered Kasyapa, her husband, who agreed to unite with her. When she expressed what kind of child she wanted, however, he was shocked and condemned himself. Nevertheless, Kasyapa ingeniously instructed Diti to strictly follow the Vaisnava austerity of Pumsavana-vrata. This would satisfy her desire for a son, but simultaneously purify her consciousness from the enmity towards Indra and the demigods. While Diti engaged in the vow ( vrata ), Indra closely monitored her every move, looking for some discrepancy to capitalise upon. When Indra caught her in violation of the strict regulations, he entered her womb and sliced the embryo into forty-nine parts. Those children became known as the Maruts, who later made friends with Indra and were saved. Upon the request of Maharaja Pariksit, Sukadeva Goswami went on to explain the details of the Pumsavana-vrata.

Previous Chitraketu Cursed Next River of Names Last updated 1 year ago

River of Names

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names “The instructions given by Narada and Angira Muni are the true spiritual instructions for the illusioned conditioned soul. This world is temporary, but because of our previous karma we come here and accept bodies, creating temporary relationships in terms of society, friendship, love, nationality and community, which are all finished at death. These temporary relationships did not exist in the past, nor will they exist in the future. Therefore, at the present moment the so-called relationships are illusions.” (SB 6.15.2) When Maharaja Chitraketu was overwhelmed by lamentation at the sudden death of his beloved son, he received a series of transcendental instructions. Firstly, the great sages Narada and Angira came and reminded Chitraketu about the body, soul, inevitable death and the subsequent transmigration that everyone will experience. Later, Chitraketu’s son came back to life and spoke to the King, quite bluntly stating: “In which birth were these individuals my mother and father? No one is actually my mother and father. How can I accept these two people as my parents?” Later, after absorbing himself in prayer, Chitraketu was further enlightened in transcendental knowledge by the Supreme Lord Himself. At every stage he received powerful insights to elevate his consciousness and bring perspective to the situation he was facing. The Srimad-Bhagavatam offers a series of interesting analogies to describe the transitory nature of relationships in this material world: Tourists meeting in a hotel: “Thereafter, Devayani, the daughter of Sukracarya, understood that the materialistic association of husband, friends and relatives is like the association in a hotel full of tourists. The relationships of society, friendship and love are created by the maya of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, exactly as in a dream.” (SB 9.19.27-28) Travellers in a restaurant: “My dear mother, in a restaurant or place for drinking cold water, many travellers are brought together, and after drinking water they continue to their respective destinations. Similarly, living entities join together in a family, and later, as a result of their own actions, they are led apart to their destinations.” (SB 7.2.21) Sticks meeting in the river: “Many planks and sticks, unable to stay together, are carried away by the force of a river’s waves. Similarly, although we are intimately related with friends and family members, we are unable to stay together because of our varied past deeds and the waves of time.” (SB 10.5.25) Fallible Soldiers in an army: “Persons devoid of atma-tattva do not enquire into the problems of life, being too attached to the fallible soldiers like the body, children and wife. Although sufficiently experienced, they still do not see their inevitable destruction.” (SB 2.1.4) Dreams that will end: “In a dream we form a society of friendship and love, and when we awaken we see that it has ceased to exist. Similarly, one’s gross society, family and love are also a dream, and this dream will be over as soon as one dies. Therefore, whether one is dreaming in a subtle way or a gross way, these dreams are all false and temporary.” (SB 7.14.3-4) Elements scattered by the wind: “Just as the wind brings together masses of clouds, blades of grass, wisps of cotton and particles of dust, only to scatter them all again, so the creator deals with His created beings in the same way.” (SB 10.82.43) In a conversation with Dhritarastra, Akrura concludes: “In this world no one has any permanent relationship with anyone else, O King. We cannot stay forever even with our own body, what to speak of our wife, children and the rest. Every creature is born alone and dies alone, and alone one experiences the just rewards of his good and evil deeds.” (SB 10.49.20-21) So how do we mediate the relationships of this world? Are all of our connections ultimately meaningless and simply a waste of time?

Previous Diti, Indra and the Maruts Next Attention vs Attachment Last updated 1 year ago

Attention vs Attachment

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Attention vs Attachment Without genuinely investing in relationships, situations and aspirations, how can we make any real progress in those areas? Where the attention goes, energy flows and results invariably show. Simultaneously, however, wisdom teachers constantly remind us to remain detached and aloof; everything in this world is a fleeting reality destined for destruction at the ruthless hands of time. In ultimate reality, we are building castles in the sand. So what’s the balance? When does genuine concern and responsibility evolve into an unhealthy attachment? How can we identify the extremes of over-zealous endeavour and irresponsible aloofness? Is it possible to cultivate a spiritually elevated consciousness whilst sensitively navigating day-to-day realities and responsibilities? The Srimad-Bhagavatam makes a clear distinction between being attentive and being attached. Every spiritual practitioner should know how to strike the balance and avoid overstepping the line. Intelligence vs Emotion (The Driver) – an attentive person is driven to act by spiritual intelligence, clearly understanding the broader need and purpose behind their endeavour. An attached person, however, is driven by fleeting emotions and is therefore flickering in effort and determination. It’s not that an attentive person is not passionate or emotionally involved, but every endeavour is founded upon wisdom and knowledge. Are you driven by intelligence or emotion? Endeavour vs Result (The Success) – an attentive person invests energy in crafting a perfect endeavour, doing everything within their control to make the best attempt possible. This is their measure of success. An attached person, however, evaluates success based on the outcome and result. An attentive person is not indifferent to the results, but simply uses them to understand how they can refine and improve their endeavour. Are you concerned about giving your best or achieving the best? Eternal vs Temporary (The Vision) – an attentive person is always awake to the backdrop of spiritual reality, though living and functioning in the ‘real’ world. An attached person, however, engrossed and entangled in their vision of this temporary life, is rendered oblivious to the ‘bigger picture.’ Attentive people are undoubtedly practical, but simultaneously transcendental. How many of your desires, decisions and directions are formulated with reference to the ultimate purpose of life?

Previous River of Names Next Transcendental Affection Last updated 1 year ago

Transcendental Affection

C - Chitraketu (14-19) River of Names Transcendental Affection In the First Canto of Srimad-Bhagavatam we find the striking prayers of Queen Kunti. With regards to family attachments, she prays: “O Lord of the universe, soul of the universe, O personality of the form of the universe, please, therefore, sever my tie of affection for my kinsmen, the Pandavas and the Vrsnis. O Lord of Madhu, as the Ganges forever flows to the sea without hindrance, let my attraction be constantly drawn unto You without being diverted to anyone else.” ( SB 1.8.41 - 42 ) In the purport, Srila Prabhupada clarifies how affection cannot be annihilated, but must be redirected in a spiritual way: “Perfection of pure devotional service is attained when all attention is diverted towards the transcendental loving service of the Lord. To cut off the tie of all other affections does not mean complete negation of the finer elements, like affection for someone else. This is not possible. A living being, whoever he may be, must have this feeling of affection for others because this is a symptom of life… The so-called affection for family, society, country, etc., consists of different phases of sense gratification. When this desire is changed for the satisfaction of the Lord, it is called devotional service.” (SB 1.8.42) But we may still wonder why Queen Kunti’s affection for her family members, who were all Krishna’s devotees, is problematic. Srila Prabhupada further clarifies: “Her affection for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis is not out of the range of devotional service because the service of the Lord and the service of the devotees are identical. Sometimes service to the devotee is more valuable than service to the Lord. But here the affection of Kuntidevi for the Pandavas and the Vrsnis was due to family relation. This tie of affection in terms of material relation is the relation of maya because the relations of the body or the mind are due to the influence of the external energy. Relations of the soul, established in relation with the Supreme Soul, are factual relations. When Kuntidevi wanted to cut off the family relation, she meant to cut off the relation of the skin. The skin relation is the cause of material bondage, but the relation of the soul is the cause of freedom.” (SB 1.8.42)

Previous Attention vs Attachment Next O.P.E.N Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.1

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच ऊचतुर्मृतकोपान्ते पतितं मृतकोपमम् । शोकाभिभूतं राजानं बोधयन्तौ सदुक्तिभि: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
ūcatur mṛtakopānte
[oochatur mritakopaante]
patitaṁ mṛtakopamam
[patitam mritakopamam]
śokābhibhūtaṁ rājānaṁ
[shokaabhibhootam raajaanam]
bodhayantau sad-uktibhiḥ
[bodhayantau sad-uktibhih]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said ūcatuḥ — they spoke mṛtaka — the dead body upānte — near patitam — fallen mṛtaka-upamam — exactly like another dead body śoka-abhibhūtam — very much aggrieved by lamentation rājānam — to the King bodhayantau — giving instruction sat-uktibhiḥ — by instructions that are factual, not temporary.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
ūcatur mṛtakopānte
ūcatuḥ
they spoke
mṛtaka
the dead body
upānte
near
patitam
fallen
patitaṁ mṛtakopamam
mṛtaka-upamam
exactly like another dead body
śokābhibhūtaṁ rājānaṁ
śoka-abhibhūtam
very much aggrieved by lamentation
rājānam
to the King
bodhayantau sad-uktibhiḥ
bodhayantau
giving instruction
sat-uktibhiḥ
by instructions that are factual, not temporary.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: While King Citraketu, overcome by lamentation, lay like a dead body at the side of the dead body of his son, the two great sages Nārada and Aṅgirā instructed him about spiritual consciousness as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: While King Citraketu, overcome by lamentation, lay like a dead body at the side of the dead body of his son, the two great sages Nārada and Aṅgirā instructed him about spiritual consciousness as follows. In the Fifteenth Chapter the two sages deliver the King from suffering and Nārada gives him instructions on a mantra.
As Citraketu lay like a corpse beside his dead son, the two sages Nārada and Aṅgirā began to instruct him about spiritual consciousness. Teaching arrives at the moment of total collapse.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I missed a teaching that came at the moment of my collapse because I was too undone to hear it?
  • Whose collapse near me is the right moment for a gentle word?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.2

↗
कोऽयं स्यात्तव राजेन्द्र भवान् यमनुशोचति । त्वं चास्य कतम: सृष्टौ पुरेदानीमत: परम् ॥ २ ॥
ko ’yaṁ syāt tava rājendra
[ko ’yam syaat tava raajendra]
bhavān yam anuśocati
[bhavaan yam anushochati]
tvaṁ cāsya katamaḥ sṛṣṭau
[tvam chaasya katamah srishtau]
puredānīm ataḥ param
[puredaaneem atah param]
kaḥ — who ayam — this syāt — is tava — to you rāja-indra — O best of kings bhavān — Your Lordship yam — whom anuśocati — laments over tvam — you ca — and asya — to him (the dead boy) katamaḥ — who sṛṣṭau — in the birth purā — previously idānīm — at this time, at the present ataḥ param — and hereafter, in the future.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ko ’yaṁ syāt tava rājendra
bhavān yam anuśocati
tvaṁ cāsya katamaḥ sṛṣṭau
kaḥ
who
ayam
this
syāt
is
tava
to you
puredānīm ataḥ param
rāja-indra
O best of kings
bhavān
Your Lordship
yam
whom
anuśocati
laments over
tvam
you
ca
and
asya
to him (the dead boy)
katamaḥ
who
sṛṣṭau
in the birth
purā
previously
idānīm
at this time, at the present
ataḥ param
and hereafter, in the future.
O King, what relationship does the dead body for which you lament have with you, and what relationship do you have with him? You may say that you are now related as father and son, but do you think this relationship existed before? Does it truly exist now? Will it continue in the future?

The instructions given by Nārada and Aṅgirā Muni are the true spiritual instructions for the illusioned conditioned soul. This world is temporary, but because of our previous karma we come here and accept bodies, creating temporary relationships in terms of society, friendship, love, nationality and community, which are all finished at death. These temporary relationships did not exist in the past, nor will they exist in the future. Therefore at the present moment the so-called relationships are illusions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of kings! What relationship does the dead body for which you lament have with you, and what relationship do you have with him? Who is who, in your previous birth, this birth and future birth? “Who is he in relation to you?” “He is my son.” “That is true, But what you in relation to him?” “I am the father.” In previous birth, or now, or in next birth, who is who? Those who had a relationship with sons in a previous birth, at death were separated from those sons and in this present life they are sons of that person or another person. In another life they become wives, enemies or friends of that or another person.
What relationship does the dead body have with you — really? You may say father and son, but did that bond exist before birth, will it exist after? The sage opens with a metaphysical question, not consolation.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my relationships am I treating as eternal when the form is only temporary?
  • What does it mean to love within an arrangement that has a beginning and end?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.3

↗
यथा प्रयान्ति संयान्ति स्रोतोवेगेन बालुका: । संयुज्यन्ते वियुज्यन्ते तथा कालेन देहिन: ॥ ३ ॥
yathā prayānti saṁyānti
[yathaa prayaanti samyaanti]
sroto-vegena bālukāḥ
[sroto-vegena baalukaah]
saṁyujyante viyujyante
[samyujyante viyujyante]
tathā kālena dehinaḥ
[tathaa kaalena dehinah]
yathā — just as prayānti — move apart saṁyānti — come together srotaḥ-vegena — by the force of waves bālukāḥ — the small particles of sand saṁyujyante — they are united viyujyante — they are separated tathā — similarly kālena — by time dehinaḥ — the living entities who have accepted material bodies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā prayānti saṁyānti
yathā
just as
prayānti
move apart
saṁyānti
come together
sroto-vegena bālukāḥ
srotaḥ-vegena
by the force of waves
bālukāḥ
the small particles of sand
saṁyujyante viyujyante
saṁyujyante
they are united
viyujyante
they are separated
tathā kālena dehinaḥ
tathā
similarly
kālena
by time
dehinaḥ
the living entities who have accepted material bodies.
O King, as small particles of sand sometimes come together and are sometimes separated due to the force of the waves, the living entities who have accepted material bodies sometimes come together and are sometimes separated by the force of time.

The misunderstanding of the conditioned soul is the bodily conception of life. The body is material, but within the body is the soul. This is spiritual understanding. Unfortunately, one who is in ignorance, under the spell of material illusion, accepts the body to be the self. He cannot understand that the body is matter. Like small particles of sand, bodies come together and are separated by the force of time, and people falsely lament for unification and separation. Unless one knows this, there is no question of happiness. Therefore in Bhagavad-gītā (2.13) this is the first instruction given by the Lord:

dehino ’smin yathā dehe kaumāraṁ yauvanaṁ jarā tathā dehāntara-prāptir dhīras tatra na muhyati

“As the embodied soul continually passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. The self-realized soul is not bewildered by such a change.” We are not the body; we are spiritual beings trapped in the body. Our real interest lies in understanding this simple fact. Then we can make further spiritual progress. Otherwise, if we remain in the bodily conception of life, our miserable material existence will continue forever. Political adjustments, social welfare work, medical assistance and the other programs we have manufactured for peace and happiness will never endure. We shall have to undergo the sufferings of material life one after another. Therefore material life is said to be duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam; it is a reservoir of miserable conditions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As small particles of sand come together and are separated by the force of the waves, the jīvas come together and are separated by the force of time. The meaning is explained. Just as particles of sand join and separate by the force of waves, jīvas meet and separate by the force of time.
Like sand particles brought together and separated by waves, embodied souls meet and part by time. The image disarms our sense that 'we' are the architects of our gatherings.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my gatherings did time, not I, actually arrange?
  • What does that recognition do to my grip on them?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.4

↗
यथा धानासु वै धाना भवन्ति न भवन्ति च । एवं भूतानि भूतेषु चोदितानीशमायया ॥ ४ ॥
yathā dhānāsu vai dhānā
[yathaa dhaanaasu vai dhaanaa]
bhavanti na bhavanti ca
[bhavanti na bhavanti cha]
evaṁ bhūtāni bhūteṣu
[evam bhootaani bhooteshu]
coditānīśa-māyayā
[choditaaneesha-maayayaa]
yathā — just as dhānāsu — through seeds of paddy vai — indeed dhānāḥ — grains bhavanti — are generated na — not bhavanti — are generated ca — also evam — in this way bhūtāni — the living entities bhūteṣu — in other living entities coditāni — impelled īśa-māyayā — by the potency or power of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā dhānāsu vai dhānā
yathā
just as
dhānāsu
through seeds of paddy
vai
indeed
dhānāḥ
grains
bhavanti na bhavanti ca
bhavanti
are generated
na
not
bhavanti
are generated
ca
also
evaṁ bhūtāni bhūteṣu
evam
in this way
bhūtāni
the living entities
bhūteṣu
in other living entities
coditānīśa-māyayā
coditāni
impelled
īśa-māyayā
by the potency or power of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
When seeds are sown in the ground, they sometimes grow into plants and sometimes do not. Sometimes the ground is not fertile, and the sowing of seeds is unproductive. Similarly, sometimes a prospective father, being impelled by the potency of the Supreme Lord, can beget a child, but sometimes conception does not take place. Therefore one should not lament over the artificial relationship of parenthood, which is ultimately controlled by the Supreme Lord.

Mahārāja Citraketu was actually not destined to get a son. Therefore although he married hundreds and thousands of wives, all of them proved barren, and he could not beget even one child. When Aṅgirā Ṛṣi came to see the King, the King requested the great sage to enable him to have at least one son. Because of the blessing of Aṅgirā Ṛṣi, a child was sent by the grace of māyā, but the child was not to live for long. Therefore in the beginning Aṅgirā Ṛṣi told the King that he would beget a child who would cause jubilation and lamentation.

King Citraketu was not destined to get a child by providence, or the will of the Supreme. Just as sterile grain cannot produce more grain, a sterile person, by the will of the Supreme Lord, cannot beget a child. Sometimes a child is born even to an impotent father and sterile mother, and sometimes a potent father and fertile mother are childless. Indeed, sometimes a child is born despite contraceptive methods, and therefore the parents kill the child in the womb. In the present age, killing children in the womb has become a common practice. Why? When contraceptive methods are taken, why don’t they act? Why is a child sometimes produced so that the father and mother have to kill it in the womb? We must conclude that our arrangement of so-called scientific knowledge cannot determine what will take place; what is enacted actually depends on the supreme will. It is by the supreme will that we are situated in certain conditions in terms of family, community and personality. These are all arrangements of the Supreme Lord according to our desires under the spell of māyā, illusion. In devotional life, therefore, one should not desire anything, since everything depends on the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As stated in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu (1.1.11):

anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānu- śīlanaṁ bhaktir uttamā

“One should render transcendental loving service to the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa favorably and without desire for material profit or gain through fruitive activities or philosophical speculation. That is called pure devotional service.” One should act only to develop Kṛṣṇa consciousness. For everything else, one should fully depend upon the Supreme Person. We should not create plans that will ultimately make us frustrated.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Just as grains appear or do not appear from seeds, children appear or do not appear from fathers, driven by māyā. “I may or may not be his father or his son in this birth or another birth. But enough with such questions for now! Please tell me for what fault do I experience suffering caused by separation from my object of affection?” It is not your offense. The cause is time alone. This is what they explain. “But for a long time I did not have a son. In my old age a son was born but died. This is great suffering.” Among the grain seeds some produce grains and some do not, but get destroyed. Among fathers some produce sons and some do not. Though some grains produce and others are produced, they have no relationship as father and son. Thus there is no lamentation. Dhānā means roasted grains and a woman. Thus there is another meaning. Just as grain does not arise from roasted grains, sons do not arise in persons like you without the karma for having sons. But O King (iśa)! Driven by māyā, the living entities have sons. To enlighten you, I, Aṅgirā, became your son through the influence of māyā.
Sown seeds sometimes grow, sometimes don't; sometimes a prospective father, by the Lord's potency, begets, sometimes not. Even procreation is not under our straightforward control.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I taking credit for what was actually His potency acting through me?
  • Where am I taking blame for what was simply not given?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.5

↗
वयं च त्वं च ये चेमे तुल्यकालाश्चराचरा: । जन्ममृत्योर्यथा पश्चात् प्राङ्‌नैवमधुनापि भो: ॥ ५ ॥
vayaṁ ca tvaṁ ca ye ceme
[vayam cha tvam cha ye cheme]
tulya-kālāś carācarāḥ
[tulya-kaalaash charaacharaah]
janma-mṛtyor yathā paścāt
[janma-mrityor yathaa pashchaat]
prāṅ naivam adhunāpi bhoḥ
[praan naivam adhunaapi bhoh]
vayam — we (the great sages and the ministers and adherents of the King) ca — and tvam — you ca — also ye — who ca — also ime — these tulya-kālāḥ — assembled at the same time cara-acarāḥ — moving and not moving janma — birth mṛtyoḥ — and death yathā — just as paścāt — after prāk — before na — not evam — thus adhunā — at present api — although bhoḥ — O King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vayaṁ ca tvaṁ ca ye ceme
vayam
we (the great sages and the ministers and adherents of the King)
ca
and
tvam
you
ca
also
ye
who
tulya-kālāś carācarāḥ
ca
also
ime
these
tulya-kālāḥ
assembled at the same time
cara-acarāḥ
moving and not moving
janma-mṛtyor yathā paścāt
janma
birth
mṛtyoḥ
and death
yathā
just as
paścāt
after
prāṅ naivam adhunāpi bhoḥ
prāk
before
na
not
evam
thus
adhunā
at present
api
although
bhoḥ
O King.
O King, both you and we — your advisers, wives and ministers — as well as everything moving and not moving throughout the entire cosmos at this time, are in a temporary situation. Before our birth this situation did not exist, and after our death it will exist no longer. Therefore our situation now is temporary, although it is not false.

The Māyāvādī philosophers say, brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā: Brahman, the living being, is factual, but his present bodily situation is false. According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, however, the present situation is not false but temporary. It is like a dream. A dream does not exist before one falls asleep, nor does it continue after one awakens. The period for dreaming exists only between these two, and therefore it is false in the sense that it is impermanent. Similarly, the entire material creation, including our own creation and those of others, is impermanent. We do not lament for the situation in a dream before the dream takes place or after it is over, and so during the dream, or during a dreamlike situation, one should not accept it as factual and lament about it. This is real knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Both you and we, as well as everything moving and not moving who are situated here now, were not together before our births and will not be together after our deaths. We are not even together at the present time. Not only is a dead son lamentable. Wife, ministers and relatives all presently existing are to be lamented. We are all situated here now at one time (tulya-kālāḥ). Before our birth and after our death, we do not exist. Even now we do not exist. Things which do not exist in all three phases of time cannot be called substantial. That is the meaning. Pious persons do not consider insubstantial, impermanent objects. Though the objects are real they are regarded as unreal (because they are temporary).
You, we, and everything moving and nonmoving are temporary — before birth absent, after death absent. The honest framing makes attachment harder to defend.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life would I hold differently if I genuinely accepted its temporariness?
  • Which 'permanent' arrangements am I quietly betting on?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.6

↗
भूतैर्भूतानि भूतेश: सृजत्यवति हन्ति च । आत्मसृष्टैरस्वतन्त्रैरनपेक्षोऽपि बालवत् ॥ ६ ॥
bhūtair bhūtāni bhūteśaḥ
[bhootair bhootaani bhooteshah]
sṛjaty avati hanti ca
[srijaty avati hanti cha]
ātma-sṛṣṭair asvatantrair
[aatma-srishtair asvatantrair]
anapekṣo ’pi bālavat
[anapeksho ’pi baalavat]
bhūtaiḥ — by some living beings bhūtāni — other living entities bhūta-īśaḥ — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the master of everything sṛjati — creates avati — maintains hanti — kills ca — also ātma-sṛṣṭaiḥ — who are created by Him asvatantraiḥ — not independent anapekṣaḥ — not interested (in creation) api — although bāla-vat — like a boy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūtair bhūtāni bhūteśaḥ
bhūtaiḥ
by some living beings
bhūtāni
other living entities
bhūta-īśaḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the master of everything
sṛjaty avati hanti ca
sṛjati
creates
avati
maintains
hanti
kills
ca
also
ātma-sṛṣṭair asvatantrair
ātma-sṛṣṭaiḥ
who are created by Him
asvatantraiḥ
not independent
anapekṣaḥ
not interested (in creation)
anapekṣo ’pi bālavat
api
although
bāla-vat
like a boy.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, the master and proprietor of everything, is certainly not interested in the temporary cosmic manifestation. Nonetheless, just as a boy at the beach creates something in which he is not interested, the Lord, keeping everything under His control, causes creation, maintenance and annihilation. He creates by engaging a father to beget a son, He maintains by engaging a government or king to see to the public’s welfare, and He annihilates through agents for killing, such as snakes. The agents for creation, maintenance and annihilation have no independent potency, but because of the spell of the illusory energy, one thinks himself the creator, maintainer and annihilator.

No one can independently create, maintain or annihilate. Bhagavad-gītā (3.27) therefore says:

prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ ahaṅkāra-vimūḍhātmā kartāham iti manyate

“The bewildered spirit soul, under the influence of the three modes of material nature, thinks himself the doer of activities that are in actuality carried out by nature.” Prakṛti, material nature, as directed by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, induces all living entities to create, maintain or annihilate according to the modes of nature. But the living entity, without knowledge of the Supreme Person and His agent the material energy, thinks that he is the doer. In fact, he is not at all the doer. As an agent of the supreme doer, the Supreme Lord, one should abide by the Lord’s orders. The present chaotic conditions of the world are due to the ignorance of leaders who forget that they have been appointed to act by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Because they have been appointed by the Lord, their duty is to consult the Lord and act accordingly. The book for consultation is Bhagavad-gītā, in which the Supreme Lord gives directions. Therefore those who are engaged in creation, maintenance and annihilation should consult the Supreme Person, who has appointed them, and should act accordingly. Then everyone will be satisfied, and there will be no disturbances.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, indifferent, like a child playing, creates, maintains and destroys all beings by other beings, who are created by him and are dependent on him. Observing that your son was born, but by some harsh cause was destroyed, you think that your bearing a son is good and others’ destroying him is bad. The Lord creates living entities through fathers, maintains them through kings and destroys them through snakes. These beings are create by the Lord and are dependent on the Lord (ātma-sṛṣṭaih). “But if the Lord is full in his desires, why does he create these beings?” He creates, but is indifferent, like a boy playing.
The Lord, not interested in temporary creation, creates as a boy at the beach plays — and destroys what He made. The seriousness with which we hold the world is not how He holds it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I take my own creations more seriously than the Lord takes His?
  • What would 'playing at the beach' look like in my life-work?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.7

↗
देहेन देहिनो राजन् देहाद्देहोऽभिजायते । बीजादेव यथा बीजं देह्यर्थ इव शाश्वत: ॥ ७ ॥
dehena dehino rājan
[dehena dehino raajan]
dehād deho ’bhijāyate
[dehaad deho ’bhijaayate]
bījād eva yathā bījaṁ
[beejaad eva yathaa beejam]
dehy artha iva śāśvataḥ
[dehy artha iva shaashvatah]
dehena — by the body dehinaḥ — of the father possessing a material body rājan — O King dehāt — from the body (of the mother) dehaḥ — another body abhijāyate — takes birth bījāt — from one seed eva — indeed yathā — just as bījam — another seed dehī — a person who has accepted a material body arthaḥ — the material elements iva — like śāśvataḥ — eternal.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dehena dehino rājan
dehena
by the body
dehinaḥ
of the father possessing a material body
rājan
O King
dehād deho ’bhijāyate
dehāt
from the body (of the mother)
dehaḥ
another body
bījād eva yathā bījaṁ
abhijāyate
takes birth
bījāt
from one seed
eva
indeed
dehy artha iva śāśvataḥ
yathā
just as
bījam
another seed
dehī
a person who has accepted a material body
arthaḥ
the material elements
iva
like
śāśvataḥ
eternal.
As from one seed another seed is generated, O King, so from one body [the body of the father], through another body [the body of the mother], a third body is generated [the body of a son]. As the elements of the material body are eternal, the living entity who appears through these material elements is also eternal.

From Bhagavad-gītā we understand that there are two energies, namely the superior energy and inferior energy. Inferior energy consists of the five gross and three subtle material elements. The living entity, who represents the superior energy, appears in different types of bodies through these elements by the manipulation or supervision of the material energy. Actually both the material and spiritual energies — matter and spirit — exist eternally as potencies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The potent entity is the Supreme Person. Since the spiritual energy, the living being, who is part and parcel of the Supreme Lord, desires to enjoy this material world, the Lord gives him a chance to accept different types of material bodies and enjoy or suffer in different material conditions. Factually, the spiritual energy, the living entity who desires to enjoy material things, is manipulated by the Supreme Lord. The so-called father and mother have nothing to do with the living entity. As a result of his own choice and karma, the living being takes different bodies through the agency of so-called fathers and mothers.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as from one seed another seed is generated, O King, so by the body of the father another body, a son, is produced through the body of the mother. (Why do you lament, since the body is still here?) But the object called the jīva is eternal. “What you said is true. I, a father, created by the Lord, produced a son, who is now dead. Therefore I lament.” The two sages respond. By the body of the father, the body of the son is born from the body of a mother, just as a seed is born from another seed. Since the body of the son which you produced is present before you now, why do you lament? This is the intention of the statement. “But I am lamenting because the jīva is not longer present.” They reply. The jīva is eternal. It is not produced by you. Thus you have no relationship at all with it.
As seed produces seed through soil, body produces body through mother — the elements are eternal but the soul is also eternal, distinct from the body. Inheritance of body is not inheritance of self.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I treat what I inherited (looks, traits, possessions) as my actual self?
  • What in me is irreducible to lineage?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.8

↗
देहदेहिविभागोऽयमविवेककृत: पुरा । जातिव्यक्तिविभागोऽयं यथा वस्तुनि कल्पित: ॥ ८ ॥
deha-dehi-vibhāgo ’yam
[deha-dehi-vibhaago ’yam]
aviveka-kṛtaḥ purā
[aviveka-kritah puraa]
jāti-vyakti-vibhāgo ’yaṁ
[jaati-vyakti-vibhaago ’yam]
yathā vastuni kalpitaḥ
[yathaa vastuni kalpitah]
deha — of this body dehi — and the proprietor of the body vibhāgaḥ — the division ayam — this aviveka — from ignorance kṛtaḥ — made purā — from time immemorial jāti — of the class or caste vyakti — and the individual vibhāgaḥ — division ayam — this yathā — just as vastuni — in the original object kalpitaḥ — imagined.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
deha-dehi-vibhāgo ’yam
deha
of this body
dehi
and the proprietor of the body
vibhāgaḥ
the division
ayam
this
aviveka-kṛtaḥ purā
aviveka
from ignorance
kṛtaḥ
made
purā
from time immemorial
jāti-vyakti-vibhāgo ’yaṁ
jāti
of the class or caste
vyakti
and the individual
vibhāgaḥ
division
ayam
this
yathā
just as
yathā vastuni kalpitaḥ
vastuni
in the original object
kalpitaḥ
imagined.
Divisions of generalization and specification, such as nationality and individuality, are the imaginations of persons who are not advanced in knowledge.

Actually there are two energies — material and spiritual. Both of them are ever-existing because they are emanations from the eternal truth, the Supreme Lord. Because the individual soul, the individual living entity, has desired to act in forgetfulness of his original identity since time immemorial, he is accepting different positions in material bodies and being designated according to many divisions of nationality, community, society, species and so on.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as divisions of general and specific are imagined in the absolute, so divisions of body and soul with mutual dependence are imagined because of beginningless ignorance. “Since the soul is the partner with the temporary body, it should also be temporary.” The distinction of soul and body which seem to be mutually dependent is produced from beginningless ignorance, just as the division of generic (jāti) and specific (vyakti) in the eternal Brahman is imaginary, since it cannot be discerned that they are mutually dependent.
Divisions like nationality and individuality are imaginations of those not advanced in knowledge. Identities seem solid until you put them under the light of soul-knowledge.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my identity-categories survive contact with the soul's reality, and which dissolve?
  • Where am I clinging to a category that won't outlast my body?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.9

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच एवमाश्वासितो राजा चित्रकेतुर्द्विजोक्तिभि: । विमृज्य पाणिना वक्त्रमाधिम्‍लानमभाषत ॥ ९ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
evam āśvāsito rājā
[evam aashvaasito raajaa]
citraketur dvijoktibhiḥ
[chitraketur dvijoktibhih]
vimṛjya pāṇinā vaktram
[vimrijya paaninaa vaktram]
ādhi-mlānam abhāṣata
[aadhi-mlaanam abhaashata]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said evam — thus āśvāsitaḥ — being enlightened or given hope rājā — the King citraketuḥ — Citraketu dvija-uktibhiḥ — by the instructions of the great brāhmaṇas (Nārada and Aṅgirā Ṛṣi) vimṛjya — wiping off pāṇinā — by the hand vaktram — his face ādhi-mlānam — shriveled due to lamentation abhāṣata — spoke intelligently.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
evam āśvāsito rājā
evam
thus
āśvāsitaḥ
being enlightened or given hope
rājā
the King
citraketur dvijoktibhiḥ
citraketuḥ
Citraketu
dvija-uktibhiḥ
by the instructions of the great brāhmaṇas (Nārada and Aṅgirā Ṛṣi)
vimṛjya pāṇinā vaktram
vimṛjya
wiping off
pāṇinā
by the hand
vaktram
his face
ādhi-mlānam abhāṣata
ādhi-mlānam
shriveled due to lamentation
abhāṣata
spoke intelligently.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: Thus enlightened by the instructions of Nārada and Aṅgirā, King Citraketu became hopeful with knowledge. Wiping his shriveled face with his hand, the King began to speak.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Thus pacified by the instructions of Nārada and Aṅgirā, King Citraketu, wiping his shriveled face with his hand, the King began to speak.
Enlightened by Nārada and Aṅgirā, Citraketu wiped his shriveled face and began to speak. Teaching, properly received, restores even a shriveled face.
Reflection Questions
  • What teaching could begin to restore my own dried-out face?
  • What is the simple physical act (wiping the face) that signals my return?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.10

↗
श्रीराजोवाच कौ युवां ज्ञानसम्पन्नौ महिष्ठौ च महीयसाम् । अवधूतेन वेषेण गूढाविह समागतौ ॥ १० ॥
śrī-rājovāca
[shree-raajovaacha]
kau yuvāṁ jñāna-sampannau
[kau yuvaam jnaana-sampannau]
mahiṣṭhau ca mahīyasām
[mahishthau cha maheeyasaam]
avadhūtena veṣeṇa
[avadhootena veshena]
gūḍhāv iha samāgatau
[goodhaav iha samaagatau]
śrī-rājā uvāca — King Citraketu said kau — who yuvām — you two jñāna-sampannau — fully developed in knowledge mahiṣṭhau — the greatest ca — also mahīyasām — among other great personalities avadhūtena — of the liberated wandering mendicants veṣeṇa — by the dress gūḍhau — disguised iha — in this place samāgatau — arrived.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rājovāca
śrī-rājā uvāca
King Citraketu said
kau yuvāṁ jñāna-sampannau
kau
who
yuvām
you two
jñāna-sampannau
fully developed in knowledge
mahiṣṭhau ca mahīyasām
mahiṣṭhau
the greatest
ca
also
mahīyasām
among other great personalities
avadhūtena veṣeṇa
avadhūtena
of the liberated wandering mendicants
veṣeṇa
by the dress
gūḍhāv iha samāgatau
gūḍhau
disguised
iha
in this place
samāgatau
arrived.
King Citraketu said: You have both come here dressed like avadhūtas, liberated persons, just to cover your identities, but I see that of all men, you are the most elevated in awareness. You know everything as it is. Therefore you are the greatest of all great personalities.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Citraketu said: You two, endowed with knowledge, greatest amount the great, have arrived here in the dress of mendicants. The two sages had dressed as mendicants to hide their identity.
You dressed like avadhūtas to hide your identity, but I see you are the most elevated knowers — please instruct me. Real saints come disguised; recognition is the disciple's task.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose disguise have I failed to penetrate?
  • Where am I demanding clear credentials from saints who travel in disguise?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.11

↗
चरन्ति ह्यवनौ कामं ब्राह्मणा भगवत्प्रिया: । माद‍ृशां ग्राम्यबुद्धीनां बोधायोन्मत्तलिङ्गिन: ॥ ११ ॥
caranti hy avanau kāmaṁ
[charanti hy avanau kaamam]
brāhmaṇā bhagavat-priyāḥ
[braahmanaa bhagavat-priyaah]
mādṛśāṁ grāmya-buddhīnāṁ
[maadrishaam graamya-buddheenaam]
bodhāyonmatta-liṅginaḥ
[bodhaayonmatta-linginah]
caranti — wander hi — indeed avanau — on the surface of the world kāmam — according to desire brāhmaṇāḥ — the brāhmaṇas bhagavat-priyāḥ — who are also Vaiṣṇavas, very dear to the Personality of Godhead mā-dṛśām — of those like me grāmya-buddhīnām — who are obsessed with temporary material consciousness bodhāya — for the awakening unmatta-liṅginaḥ — who dress as if madmen.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
caranti hy avanau kāmaṁ
caranti
wander
brāhmaṇā bhagavat-priyāḥ
mādṛśāṁ grāmya-buddhīnāṁ
hi
indeed
avanau
on the surface of the world
kāmam
according to desire
brāhmaṇāḥ
the brāhmaṇas
bhagavat-priyāḥ
who are also Vaiṣṇavas, very dear to the Personality of Godhead
bodhāyonmatta-liṅginaḥ
mā-dṛśām
of those like me
grāmya-buddhīnām
who are obsessed with temporary material consciousness
bodhāya
for the awakening
unmatta-liṅginaḥ
who dress as if madmen.
Brāhmaṇas who are exalted to the position of Vaiṣṇavas, the most dear servants of Kṛṣṇa, sometimes dress like madmen. Just to benefit materialists like us, who are always attached to sense gratification, and just to dissipate our ignorance, these Vaiṣṇavas wander on the surface of the globe according to their desire.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brāhmaṇas who are Vaiṣṇavas, the most dear servants of the Lord, dressed like madmen, wander the earth at will to enlighten materialist persons like me.
Vaiṣṇavas elevated as Kṛṣṇa's dear servants sometimes dress as madmen to benefit attached materialists like us. Their unusual exterior is meant for our benefit.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'mad' behavior might be a deliberate teaching device?
  • Could I be less judgmental of the 'mad' devotee I sometimes notice?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.12-15

↗
कुमारो नारद ऋभुरङ्गिरा देवलोऽसित: । अपान्तरतमा व्यासो मार्कण्डेयोऽथ गौतम: ॥ १२ ॥ वसिष्ठो भगवान् राम: कपिलो बादरायणि: । दुर्वासा याज्ञवल्‍क्यश्च जातुकर्णस्तथारुणि: ॥ १३ ॥ रोमशश्‍च्यवनो दत्त आसुरि: सपतञ्जलि: । ऋषिर्वेदशिरा धौम्यो मुनि: पञ्चशिखस्तथा ॥ १४ ॥ हिरण्यनाभ: कौशल्य: श्रुतदेव ऋतध्वज: । एते परे च सिद्धेशाश्चरन्ति ज्ञानहेतव: ॥ १५ ॥
kumāro nārada ṛbhur
[kumaaro naarada ribhur]
aṅgirā devalo ’sitaḥ
[angiraa devalo ’sitah]
apāntaratamā vyāso
[apaantaratamaa vyaaso]
mārkaṇḍeyo ’tha gautamaḥ
[maarkandeyo ’tha gautamah]
vasiṣṭho bhagavān rāmaḥ
[vasishtho bhagavaan raamah]
kapilo bādarāyaṇiḥ
[kapilo baadaraayanih]
durvāsā yājñavalkyaś ca
[durvaasaa yaajnavalkyash cha]
jātukarṇas tathāruṇiḥ
[jaatukarnas tathaarunih]
romaśaś cyavano datta
[romashash chyavano datta]
āsuriḥ sapatañjaliḥ
[aasurih sapatanjalih]
ṛṣir veda-śirā dhaumyo
[rishir veda-shiraa dhaumyo]
muniḥ pañcaśikhas tathā
[munih panchashikhas tathaa]
hiraṇyanābhaḥ kauśalyaḥ
[hiranyanaabhah kaushalyah]
śrutadeva ṛtadhvajaḥ
[shrutadeva ritadhvajah]
ete pare ca siddheśāś
[ete pare cha siddheshaash]
caranti jñāna-hetavaḥ
[charanti jnaana-hetavah]
kumāraḥ — Sanat-kumāra nāradaḥ — Nārada Muni ṛbhuḥ — Ṛbhu aṅgirāḥ — Aṅgirā devalaḥ — Devala asitaḥ — Asita apāntaratamāḥ — Vyāsa’s previous name, Apāntaratamā vyāsaḥ — Vyāsa mārkaṇḍeyaḥ — Mārkaṇḍeya atha — and gautamaḥ — Gautama vasiṣṭhaḥ — Vasiṣṭha bhagavān rāmaḥ — Lord Paraśurāma kapilaḥ — Kapila bādarāyaṇiḥ — Śukadeva Gosvāmī durvāsāḥ — Durvāsā yājñavalkyaḥ — Yājñavalkya ca — also jātukarṇaḥ — Jātukarṇa tathā — as well as aruṇiḥ — Aruṇi romaśaḥ — Romaśa cyavanaḥ — Cyavana dattaḥ — Dattātreya āsuriḥ — Āsuri sa-patañjaliḥ — with Patañjali Ṛṣi ṛṣiḥ — the sage veda-śirāḥ — the head of the Vedas dhaumyaḥ — Dhaumya muniḥ — the sage pañcaśikhaḥ — Pañcaśikha tathā — so also hiraṇyanābhaḥ — Hiraṇyanābha kauśalyaḥ — Kauśalya śrutadevaḥ — Śrutadeva ṛtadhvajaḥ — Ṛtadhvaja ete — all of these pare — others ca — and siddha-īśāḥ — the masters of mystic power caranti — wander jñāna-hetavaḥ — very learned persons who preach all over the world.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kumāro nārada ṛbhur
kumāraḥ
Sanat-kumāra
nāradaḥ
Nārada Muni
ṛbhuḥ
Ṛbhu
aṅgirā devalo ’sitaḥ
aṅgirāḥ
Aṅgirā
devalaḥ
Devala
apāntaratamā vyāso
asitaḥ
Asita
mārkaṇḍeyo ’tha gautamaḥ
vasiṣṭho bhagavān rāmaḥ
kapilo bādarāyaṇiḥ
apāntaratamāḥ
Vyāsa’s previous name, Apāntaratamā
vyāsaḥ
Vyāsa
durvāsā yājñavalkyaś ca
jātukarṇas tathāruṇiḥ
romaśaś cyavano datta
mārkaṇḍeyaḥ
Mārkaṇḍeya
atha
and
gautamaḥ
Gautama
āsuriḥ sapatañjaliḥ
ṛṣir veda-śirā dhaumyo
muniḥ pañcaśikhas tathā
hiraṇyanābhaḥ kauśalyaḥ
śrutadeva ṛtadhvajaḥ
vasiṣṭhaḥ
Vasiṣṭha
bhagavān rāmaḥ
Lord Paraśurāma
kapilaḥ
Kapila
bādarāyaṇiḥ
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
durvāsāḥ
Durvāsā
yājñavalkyaḥ
Yājñavalkya
ete pare ca siddheśāś
ca
also
jātukarṇaḥ
Jātukarṇa
caranti jñāna-hetavaḥ
tathā
as well as
aruṇiḥ
Aruṇi
romaśaḥ
Romaśa
cyavanaḥ
Cyavana
dattaḥ
Dattātreya
āsuriḥ
Āsuri
sa-patañjaliḥ
with Patañjali Ṛṣi
ṛṣiḥ
the sage
veda-śirāḥ
the head of the Vedas
dhaumyaḥ
Dhaumya
muniḥ
the sage
pañcaśikhaḥ
Pañcaśikha
tathā
so also
hiraṇyanābhaḥ
Hiraṇyanābha
kauśalyaḥ
Kauśalya
śrutadevaḥ
Śrutadeva
ṛtadhvajaḥ
Ṛtadhvaja
ete
all of these
pare
others
ca
and
siddha-īśāḥ
the masters of mystic power
caranti
wander
jñāna-hetavaḥ
very learned persons who preach all over the world.
O great souls, I have heard that among the great and perfect persons wandering the surface of the earth to instruct knowledge to people covered by ignorance are Sanat-kumāra, Nārada, Ṛbhu, Aṅgirā, Devala, Asita, Apāntaratamā [Vyāsadeva], Mārkaṇḍeya, Gautama, Vasiṣṭha, Bhagavān Paraśurāma, Kapila, Śukadeva, Durvāsā, Yājñavalkya, Jātukarṇa and Aruṇi. Others are Romaśa, Cyavana, Dattātreya, Āsuri, Patañjali, the great sage Dhaumya who is like the head of the Vedas, the sage Pañcaśikha, Hiraṇyanābha, Kauśalya, Śrutadeva and Ṛtadhvaja. You must certainly be among them.

The word jñāna-hetavaḥ is very significant because great personalities like those listed in these verses wander on the surface of the globe not to mislead the populace, but to distribute real knowledge. Without this knowledge, human life is wasted. The human form of life is meant for realization of one’s relationship with Kṛṣṇa, or God. One who lacks this knowledge is categorized among the animals. The Lord Himself says in Bhagavad-gītā (7.15) :

na māṁ duṣkṛtino mūḍhāḥ prapadyante narādhamāḥ māyayāpahṛta-jñānā āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ

“Those miscreants who are grossly foolish, lowest among mankind, whose knowledge is stolen by illusion, and who partake of the atheistic nature of demons, do not surrender unto Me.”

Ignorance is the bodily conception of life ( yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke … sa eva go-kharaḥ ). Practically everyone throughout the universe, especially on this planet, Bhūrloka, thinks that there is no separate existence of the body and soul and therefore no need of self-realization. But that is not a fact. Therefore all the brāhmaṇas listed here, being devotees, travel all over the world to awaken Kṛṣṇa consciousness in the hearts of such foolish materialists.

The ācāryas mentioned in these verses are described in the Mahābhārata. The word pañcaśikha is also important. One who is liberated from the conceptions of annamaya, prāṇamaya, manomaya, vijñānamaya and ānandamaya and who is perfectly aware of the subtle coverings of the soul is called pañcaśikha. According to the statements of the Mahābhārata ( Sānti-parva, Chapters 218-219), an ācārya named Pañcaśikha took birth in the family of Mahārāja Janaka, the ruler of Mithila. The Sāṅkhya philosophers accept Pañcaśikhācārya as one of them. Real knowledge pertains to the living entity dwelling within the body. Unfortunately, because of ignorance, the living entity identifies himself with the body and therefore feels pleasure and pain.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Perfect persons like the following wander the surface of the earth to instruct knowledge: Sanat-kumāra, Nārada, Ṛbhu, Aṅgirā, Devala, Asita, Apāntaratamā, Vyāsadeva, Mārkaṇḍeya, Gautama, Vasiṣṭha, Bhagavān Paraśurāma, Kapila, Śukadeva, Durvāsā, Yājñavalkya, Jātukarṇa and Aruṇi, Romaśa, Cyavana, Dattātreya, Āsuri, Patañjali, the great sage Dhaumya who is like the head of the Vedas, the sage Pañcaśikha, Hiraṇyanābha, Kauśalya, Śrutadeva and Ṛtadhvaja.
Among the great wandering teachers are Sanat-kumāra, Nārada, Ṛbhu, Aṅgirā, Devala, Asita, Vyāsadeva, Mārkaṇḍeya and others — they roam the earth to instruct the ignorant. The list itself is a kind of map of available help.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of these wandering helpers have I never thought to call on?
  • What does the existence of such a list do for my sense of being alone?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.16

↗
तस्माद्युवां ग्राम्यपशोर्मम मूढधिय: प्रभू । अन्धे तमसि मग्नस्य ज्ञानदीप उदीर्यताम् ॥ १६ ॥
tasmād yuvāṁ grāmya-paśor
[tasmaad yuvaam graamya-pashor]
mama mūḍha-dhiyaḥ prabhū
[mama moodha-dhiyah prabhoo]
andhe tamasi magnasya
[andhe tamasi magnasya]
jñāna-dīpa udīryatām
[jnaana-deepa udeeryataam]
tasmāt — therefore yuvām — both of you grāmya-paśoḥ — of an animal like a hog, pig or dog mama — me mūḍha-dhiyaḥ — who am very foolish (due to having no spiritual knowledge) prabhū — O my two lords andhe — in blind tamasi — darkness magnasya — of one who is absorbed jñāna-dīpaḥ — the torchlight of knowledge udīryatām — let it be ignited.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmād yuvāṁ grāmya-paśor
tasmāt
therefore
yuvām
both of you
grāmya-paśoḥ
of an animal like a hog, pig or dog
mama mūḍha-dhiyaḥ prabhū
mama
me
mūḍha-dhiyaḥ
who am very foolish (due to having no spiritual knowledge)
prabhū
O my two lords
andhe tamasi magnasya
andhe
in blind
tamasi
darkness
magnasya
of one who is absorbed
jñāna-dīpa udīryatām
jñāna-dīpaḥ
the torchlight of knowledge
udīryatām
let it be ignited.
Because you are great personalities, you can give me real knowledge. I am as foolish as a village animal like a pig or dog because I am merged in the darkness of ignorance. Therefore, please ignite the torch of knowledge to save me.

This is the way to receive knowledge. One must submit oneself at the lotus feet of great personalities who can actually deliver transcendental knowledge. It is therefore said, tasmād guruṁ prapadyeta jijñāsuḥ śreya uttamam: “One who is inquisitive to understand the highest goal and benefit of life must approach a bona fide spiritual master and surrender unto him.” Only one who is actually eager to receive knowledge to eradicate the darkness of ignorance is eligible to approach a guru, or spiritual master. The guru should not be approached for material benefits. One should not approach a guru just to cure some disease or receive some miraculous benefit. This is not the way to approach the guru. Tad-vijñānārtham: one should approach the guru to understand the transcendental science of spiritual life. Unfortunately, in this Age of Kali there are many bogus gurus who display magic to their disciples, and many foolish disciples want to see such magic for material benefits. These disciples are not interested in pursuing spiritual life to save themselves from the darkness of ignorance. It is said:

om ajñāna-timirāndhasya jñānāñjana-śalākayā cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ

“I was born in the darkest ignorance, and my spiritual master opened my eyes with the torch of knowledge. I offer my respectful obeisances unto him.” This gives the definition of the guru. Everyone is in the darkness of ignorance. Therefore everyone needs to be enlightened with transcendental knowledge. One who enlightens his disciple and saves him from rotting in the darkness of ignorance in this material world is a true guru.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Please kindle your flame of knowledge in me, a fool, a farm animal, drowning in the darkness of ignorance.
I am foolish as a village pig or dog, merged in ignorance — please ignite the torch of knowledge. Strong self-description prepares the disciple for strong instruction.
Reflection Questions
  • Can I describe my own current foolishness without softening?
  • What torch would I ask the right teacher to light?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.17

↗
श्रीअङ्गिरा उवाच अहं ते पुत्रकामस्य पुत्रदोऽस्म्यङ्गिरा नृप । एष ब्रह्मसुत: साक्षान्नारदो भगवानृषि: ॥ १७ ॥
śrī-aṅgirā uvāca
[shree-angiraa uvaacha]
ahaṁ te putra-kāmasya
[aham te putra-kaamasya]
putrado ’smy aṅgirā nṛpa
[putrado ’smy angiraa nripa]
eṣa brahma-sutaḥ sākṣān
[esha brahma-sutah saakshaan]
nārado bhagavān ṛṣiḥ
[naarado bhagavaan rishih]
śrī-aṅgirāḥ uvāca — the great sage Aṅgirā said aham — I te — of you putra-kāmasya — desiring to have a son putra-daḥ — the giver of the son asmi — am aṅgirāḥ — Aṅgirā Ṛṣi nṛpa — O King eṣaḥ — this brahma-sutaḥ — the son of Lord Brahmā sākṣāt — directly nāradaḥ — Nārada Muni bhagavān — the most powerful ṛṣiḥ — sage.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-aṅgirā uvāca
śrī-aṅgirāḥ uvāca
the great sage Aṅgirā said
ahaṁ te putra-kāmasya
aham
I
te
of you
putra-kāmasya
desiring to have a son
putrado ’smy aṅgirā nṛpa
putra-daḥ
the giver of the son
eṣa brahma-sutaḥ sākṣān
asmi
am
aṅgirāḥ
Aṅgirā Ṛṣi
nārado bhagavān ṛṣiḥ
nṛpa
O King
eṣaḥ
this
brahma-sutaḥ
the son of Lord Brahmā
sākṣāt
directly
nāradaḥ
Nārada Muni
bhagavān
the most powerful
ṛṣiḥ
sage.
Aṅgirā said: My dear King, when you desired to have a son, I approached you. Indeed, I am the same Aṅgirā Ṛṣi who gave you this son. As for this ṛṣi, he is the great sage Nārada, the direct son of Lord Brahmā.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Aṅgirā said: O King! I am the giver of the son to you who desired a son, and this is Nārada, a great sage, son of Lord Brahmā.
Aṅgirā: I am the same who gave you this son — and this is Nārada, direct son of Brahmā. The teacher names himself and his colleague clearly; transparency is part of the instruction.
Reflection Questions
  • Do my teachers identify themselves clearly to me, or are they generic?
  • What does clear naming do for trust?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.18-19

↗
इत्थं त्वां पुत्रशोकेन मग्नं तमसि दुस्तरे । अतदर्हमनुस्मृत्य महापुरुषगोचरम् ॥ १८ ॥ अनुग्रहाय भवत: प्राप्तावावामिह प्रभो । ब्रह्मण्यो भगवद्भ‍क्तो नावासादितुमर्हसि ॥ १९ ॥
itthaṁ tvāṁ putra-śokena
[ittham tvaam putra-shokena]
magnaṁ tamasi dustare
[magnam tamasi dustare]
atad-arham anusmṛtya
[atad-arham anusmritya]
mahāpuruṣa-gocaram
[mahaapurusha-gocharam]
anugrahāya bhavataḥ
[anugrahaaya bhavatah]
prāptāv āvām iha prabho
[praaptaav aavaam iha prabho]
brahmaṇyo bhagavad-bhakto
[brahmanyo bhagavad-bhakto]
nāvāsāditum arhasi
[naavaasaaditum arhasi]
ittham — in this way tvām — you putra-śokena — because of grief at the death of your son magnam — merged tamasi — in darkness dustare — insurmountable a-tat-arham — unsuitable for a person like you anusmṛtya — remembering mahā-puruṣa — the Supreme Personality of Godhead gocaram — who are advanced in understanding anugrahāya — just to show favor bhavataḥ — toward you prāptau — arrived āvām — we two iha — in this place prabho — O King brahmaṇyaḥ — one who is situated in the Supreme Absolute Truth bhagavat-bhaktaḥ — an advanced devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead na — not avāsāditum — to lament arhasi — you deserve.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
itthaṁ tvāṁ putra-śokena
ittham
in this way
tvām
you
putra-śokena
because of grief at the death of your son
magnaṁ tamasi dustare
magnam
merged
tamasi
in darkness
dustare
insurmountable
a-tat-arham
unsuitable for a person like you
atad-arham anusmṛtya
anusmṛtya
remembering
mahāpuruṣa-gocaram
mahā-puruṣa
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
gocaram
who are advanced in understanding
anugrahāya bhavataḥ
anugrahāya
just to show favor
bhavataḥ
toward you
prāptāv āvām iha prabho
prāptau
arrived
āvām
we two
iha
in this place
prabho
O King
brahmaṇyo bhagavad-bhakto
brahmaṇyaḥ
one who is situated in the Supreme Absolute Truth
bhagavat-bhaktaḥ
an advanced devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
nāvāsāditum arhasi
na
not
avāsāditum
to lament
arhasi
you deserve.
My dear King, you are an advanced devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. To be absorbed in lamentation for the loss of something material is unsuitable for a person like you. Therefore we have both come to relieve you from this false lamentation, which is due to your being merged in the darkness of ignorance. For those who are advanced in spiritual knowledge to be affected by material loss and gain is not at all desirable.

Several words in this verse are very important. The word mahā-puruṣa refers to advanced devotees and also to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Mahā means “the supreme,” and puruṣa means “person.” One who always engages in the service of the Supreme Lord is called mahā-pauruṣika. Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit are sometimes addressed as mahā-pauruṣika. A devotee should always aspire to engage in the service of advanced devotees. As Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura has sung:

tāṅdera caraṇa sevi bhakta-sane vāsa janame janame haya, ei abhilāṣa

A devotee should always aspire to live in the association of advanced devotees and engage in the service of the Lord through the paramparā system. One should serve the mission of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu through the instructions of the great Gosvāmīs of Vṛndāvana. This is called tāṅdera caraṇa sevi. While serving the lotus feet of the Gosvāmīs, one should live in the association of devotees ( bhakta-sane vāsa ). This is the business of a devotee. A devotee should not aspire for material profit or lament for material loss. When Aṅgirā Ṛṣi and Nārada saw that Mahārāja Citraketu, an advanced devotee, had fallen in the darkness of ignorance and was lamenting for the material body of his son, by their causeless mercy they came to advise him so that he could be saved from this ignorance.

Another significant word is brahmaṇya. The Supreme Personality of Godhead is sometimes addressed by the prayer namo brahmaṇya-devāya, which offers obeisances unto the Lord because He is served by the devotees. Therefore this verse states, brahmaṇyo bhagavad-bhakto nāvāsāditum arhasi. This is the symptom of an advanced devotee. Brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā. For a devotee — an advanced, self-realized soul — there is no cause for material jubilation or lamentation. He is always transcendental to conditional life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Remembering you, who are unsuitably drowning in insurmountable ignorance because of sorrow for your son, and who can recognize great devotees, we have come here to give mercy to you. The devotee of the Lord, who serves brāhmaṇas, should not lament. You can see and think of the Lords devotees and great sages (mahā-purṣa-gocaram). Because he served the brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas he is called brahmaṇyaḥ bhagavad-bhaktaḥ. Actually however, he was not a devotee at all.
As an advanced devotee, lamenting over material loss is unsuitable for you; we have come to relieve you of this false grief. Spiritual identity sets a standard for grief.
Reflection Questions
  • Does my grief honor my identity, or contradict it?
  • Where is unrelieved grief actually inconsistent with what I have already understood?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.20

↗
तदैव ते परं ज्ञानं ददामि गृहमागत: । ज्ञात्वान्याभिनिवेशं ते पुत्रमेव ददाम्यहम् ॥ २० ॥
tadaiva te paraṁ jñānaṁ
[tadaiva te param jnaanam]
dadāmi gṛham āgataḥ
[dadaami griham aagatah]
jñātvānyābhiniveśaṁ te
[jnaatvaanyaabhinivesham te]
putram eva dadāmy aham
[putram eva dadaamy aham]
tadā — then eva — indeed te — unto you param — transcendental jñānam — knowledge dadāmi — I would have delivered gṛham — to your home āgataḥ — came jñātvā — knowing anya-abhiniveśam — absorption in something else (in material things) te — your putram — a son eva — only dadāmi — gave aham — I.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tadaiva te paraṁ jñānaṁ
tadā
then
dadāmi gṛham āgataḥ
jñātvānyābhiniveśaṁ te
putram eva dadāmy aham
eva
indeed
te
unto you
param
transcendental
jñānam
knowledge
dadāmi
I would have delivered
gṛham
to your home
āgataḥ
came
jñātvā
knowing
anya-abhiniveśam
absorption in something else (in material things)
te
your
putram
a son
eva
only
dadāmi
gave
aham
I.
When I first came to your home, I could have given you the supreme transcendental knowledge, but when I saw that your mind was absorbed in material things, I gave you only a son, who caused you jubilation and lamentation.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I would have given you spiritual knowledge when I first came to your house, but I gave you a son, knowing that you were absorbed in material objects. Daḍāmi should be adāsyam (I would have given). The second dadāmi should be adadām: I gave a son. Tenses can be interchanged according to the rule tiṅām tiṅo bhavanti.
When I first came I could have given you supreme transcendental knowledge, but seeing your mind absorbed in material things, I gave you only a son who caused joy and sorrow. Teachers give what the student is ready to receive — even if it produces the very sorrow.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'supreme knowledge' was I not ready for, and was given a substitute that hurt?
  • What am I asking my teacher for that I am not yet ready for?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.21-23

↗
अधुना पुत्रिणां तापो भवतैवानुभूयते । एवं दारा गृहा रायो विविधैश्वर्यसम्पद: ॥ २१ ॥ शब्दादयश्च विषयाश्चला राज्यविभूतय: । मही राज्यं बलं कोषो भृत्यामात्यसुहृज्जना: ॥ २२ ॥ सर्वेऽपि शूरसेनेमे शोकमोहभयार्तिदा: । गन्धर्वनगरप्रख्या: स्वप्नमायामनोरथा: ॥ २३ ॥
adhunā putriṇāṁ tāpo
[adhunaa putrinaam taapo]
bhavataivānubhūyate
[bhavataivaanubhooyate]
evaṁ dārā gṛhā rāyo
[evam daaraa grihaa raayo]
vividhaiśvarya-sampadaḥ
[vividhaishvarya-sampadah]
śabdādayaś ca viṣayāś
[shabdaadayash cha vishayaash]
calā rājya-vibhūtayaḥ
[chalaa raajya-vibhootayah]
mahī rājyaṁ balaṁ koṣo
[mahee raajyam balam kosho]
bhṛtyāmātya-suhṛj-janāḥ
[bhrityaamaatya-suhrij-janaah]
sarve ’pi śūraseneme
[sarve ’pi shooraseneme]
śoka-moha-bhayārtidāḥ
[shoka-moha-bhayaartidaah]
gandharva-nagara-prakhyāḥ
[gandharva-nagara-prakhyaah]
svapna-māyā-manorathāḥ
[svapna-maayaa-manorathaah]
adhunā — at the present moment putriṇām — of persons who have children tāpaḥ — the tribulation bhavatā — by you eva — indeed anubhūyate — is experienced evam — in this way dārāḥ — good wife gṛhāḥ — residence rāyaḥ — riches vividha — various aiśvarya — opulences sampadaḥ — prosperities śabda-ādayaḥ — sound and so on ca — and viṣayāḥ — the objects of sense gratification calāḥ — temporary rājya — of the kingdom vibhūtayaḥ — opulences mahī — land rājyam — kingdom balam — strength koṣaḥ — treasury bhṛtya — servants amātya — ministers suhṛt-janāḥ — allies sarve — all api — indeed śūrasena — O King of Śūrasena ime — these śoka — of lamentation moha — of illusion bhaya — of fear arti — and distress dāḥ — givers gandharva-nagara-prakhyāḥ — headed by the illusory sight of a gandharva-nagara, a big palace within the forest svapna — dreams māyā — illusions manorathāḥ — and concoctions of the mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
adhunā putriṇāṁ tāpo
adhunā
at the present moment
putriṇām
of persons who have children
tāpaḥ
the tribulation
bhavataivānubhūyate
bhavatā
by you
evaṁ dārā gṛhā rāyo
eva
indeed
vividhaiśvarya-sampadaḥ
śabdādayaś ca viṣayāś
calā rājya-vibhūtayaḥ
mahī rājyaṁ balaṁ koṣo
bhṛtyāmātya-suhṛj-janāḥ
anubhūyate
is experienced
evam
in this way
sarve ’pi śūraseneme
śoka-moha-bhayārtidāḥ
dārāḥ
good wife
gṛhāḥ
residence
gandharva-nagara-prakhyāḥ
rāyaḥ
riches
vividha
various
aiśvarya
opulences
sampadaḥ
prosperities
śabda-ādayaḥ
sound and so on
ca
and
viṣayāḥ
the objects of sense gratification
calāḥ
temporary
rājya
of the kingdom
vibhūtayaḥ
opulences
svapna-māyā-manorathāḥ
mahī
land
rājyam
kingdom
balam
strength
koṣaḥ
treasury
bhṛtya
servants
amātya
ministers
suhṛt-janāḥ
allies
sarve
all
api
indeed
śūrasena
O King of Śūrasena
ime
these
śoka
of lamentation
moha
of illusion
bhaya
of fear
arti
and distress
dāḥ
givers
gandharva-nagara-prakhyāḥ
headed by the illusory sight of a gandharva-nagara, a big palace within the forest
svapna
dreams
māyā
illusions
manorathāḥ
and concoctions of the mind.
My dear King, now you are actually experiencing the misery of a person who has sons and daughters. O King, owner of the state of Śūrasena, one’s wife, his house, the opulence of his kingdom, and his various other opulences and objects of sense perception are all the same in that they are temporary. One’s kingdom, military power, treasury, servants, ministers, friends and relatives are all causes of fear, illusion, lamentation and distress. They are like a gandharva-nagara, a nonexistent palace that one imagines to exist in the forest. Because they are impermanent, they are no better than illusions, dreams and mental concoctions.

This verse describes the entanglement of material existence. In material existence, the living entity possesses many things — the material body, children, wife and so on ( dehāpatya-kalatrādiṣu ). One may think that these will give him protection, but that is impossible. In spite of all these possessions, the spirit soul has to give up his present situation and accept another. The next situation may be unfavorable, but even if it is favorable, one must give it up and again accept another body. In this way, one’s tribulation in material existence continues. A sane man should be perfectly aware that these things will never be able to give him happiness. One must be situated in his spiritual identity and eternally serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead as a devotee. Aṅgirā Ṛṣi and Nārada Muni gave this instruction to Mahārāja Citraketu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Now you are experiencing the pains of a parent. O King! Your wife, house, the wealth of a kingdom, various other opulences, the objects of the senses, and the powers of ruling are all temporary. Land, kingdom, military power, treasury, servants, ministers, friends and relatives are all causes of fear, illusion, lamentation and distress. They are false, like a Gandharva city, like the objects of a dream, a magic show or imagination. It has been said that wife and other objects, because of being temporary, are not real, and because of appearing and disappearing, are cause of suffering. Besides these things, other things also, which are causes of lamentation, illusion, fear and pain, are false. One perceives that dream objects are false when waking from a dream. Objects which appear through dreams, magic or imagination are false like a Gandharva city.
You are now experiencing the misery of having children; wife, house, kingdom, opulences, and objects of sense gratification are all unreal — like dream and mental concoction. Naming the temporal as temporal is the start of release.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'dream concoction' in my life am I treating as fully real?
  • What practice helps me recognize the dream-quality of even precious things?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.24

↗
द‍ृश्यमाना विनार्थेन न द‍ृश्यन्ते मनोभवा: । कर्मभिर्ध्यायतो नानाकर्माणि मनसोऽभवन् ॥ २४ ॥
dṛśyamānā vinārthena
[drishyamaanaa vinaarthena]
na dṛśyante manobhavāḥ
[na drishyante manobhavaah]
karmabhir dhyāyato nānā-
[karmabhir dhyaayato naanaa-]
karmāṇi manaso ’bhavan
[karmaani manaso ’bhavan]
dṛśyamānāḥ — being perceived vinā — without arthena — substance or reality na — not dṛśyante — are seen manobhavāḥ — creations of mental concoction karmabhiḥ — by fruitive activities dhyāyataḥ — meditating upon nānā — various karmāṇi — fruitive activities manasaḥ — from the mind abhavan — appear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dṛśyamānā vinārthena
dṛśyamānāḥ
being perceived
vinā
without
arthena
substance or reality
na dṛśyante manobhavāḥ
na
not
dṛśyante
are seen
manobhavāḥ
creations of mental concoction
karmabhir dhyāyato nānā-
karmabhiḥ
by fruitive activities
dhyāyataḥ
meditating upon
nānā
various
karmāṇi manaso ’bhavan
karmāṇi
fruitive activities
manasaḥ
from the mind
abhavan
appear.
These visible objects like wife, children and property are like dreams and mental concoctions. Actually what we see has no permanent existence. It is sometimes seen and sometimes not. Only because of our past actions do we create such mental concoctions, and because of these concoctions, we perform further activities.

Everything material is a mental concoction because it is sometimes visible and sometimes not. At night when we dream of tigers and snakes, they are not actually present, but we are afraid because we are affected by what we envision in our dreams. Everything material is like a dream because it actually has no permanent existence.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura writes as follows in his commentary: arthena vyāghra-sarpādinā vinaiva dṛśyamānāḥ svapnādi-bhaṅge sati na dṛśyante tad evaṁ dārādayo ’vāstava-vastu-bhūtāḥ svapnādayo ’vastu-bhūtāś ca sarve manobhavāḥ mano-vāsanā janyatvān manobhavāḥ. At night one dreams of tigers and snakes, and while dreaming he actually sees them, but as soon as the dream is broken they no longer exist. Similarly, the material world is a creation of our mental concoctions. We have come to this material world to enjoy material resources, and by mental concoction we discover many, many objects of enjoyment because our minds are absorbed in material things. This is why we receive various bodies. According to our mental concoctions we work in various ways, desiring various achievements, and by nature and the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead ( karmaṇā-daiva-netreṇa ) we get the advantages we desire. Thus we become more and more involved with material concoctions. This is the reason for our suffering in the material world. By one kind of activity we create another, and they are all products of our mental concoctions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Imaginary objects seen in the absence of real objects are not seen when waking from a dream. They are products of the mind. Actions for attaining objects of a person meditating on those objects because of impressions of karma are also made of the mind. Imaginary objects are seen without some real object such as a tiger or snake existing, but when the dream is over, they are not seen. Impermanent objects like wife and false objects, like dreams, all arise from the mind, since they arise from desires in the mind (manobhavāḥ). Actions also are composed of the mind because one meditates (using his mind) on objects because of his impressions of karma (in order to carry out action). Because the action is composed of mind, the object attained is also made of the mind.
Wife, children and property are like dreams and mental concoctions — sometimes seen, sometimes not, generated by past actions. The continuity we feel is partly memory's editing.
Reflection Questions
  • Which long-running 'realities' in my life are partly my own continuous editing?
  • What appears solid because I keep saying it is?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.25

↗
अयं हि देहिनो देहो द्रव्यज्ञानक्रियात्मक: । देहिनो विविधक्लेशसन्तापकृदुदाहृत: ॥ २५ ॥
ayaṁ hi dehino deho
[ayam hi dehino deho]
dravya-jñāna-kriyātmakaḥ
[dravya-jnaana-kriyaatmakah]
dehino vividha-kleśa-
[dehino vividha-klesha-]
santāpa-kṛd udāhṛtaḥ
[santaapa-krid udaahritah]
ayam — this hi — certainly dehinaḥ — of the living entity dehaḥ — body dravya-jñāna-kriyā-ātmakaḥ — consisting of the material elements, the senses for acquiring knowledge, and the acting senses dehinaḥ — of the living entity vividha — various kleśa — sufferings santāpa — and of pains kṛt — the cause udāhṛtaḥ — is declared.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ayaṁ hi dehino deho
ayam
this
hi
certainly
dehinaḥ
of the living entity
dehaḥ
body
dravya-jñāna-kriyātmakaḥ
dravya-jñāna-kriyā-ātmakaḥ
consisting of the material elements, the senses for acquiring knowledge, and the acting senses
dehino vividha-kleśa-
dehinaḥ
of the living entity
vividha
various
kleśa
sufferings
santāpa-kṛd udāhṛtaḥ
santāpa
and of pains
kṛt
the cause
udāhṛtaḥ
is declared.
The living entity in the bodily conception of life is absorbed in the body, which is a combination of the physical elements, the five senses for gathering knowledge, and the five senses of action, along with the mind. Through the mind the living entity suffers three kinds of tribulations — adhibhautika, adhidaivika and adhyātmika. Therefore this body is a source of all miseries.

In the Fifth Canto (5.5.4), while instructing his sons, Ṛṣabhadeva said, asann api kleśada āsa dehaḥ: the body, although temporary, is the cause of all the miseries of material existence. As already discussed in the previous verse, the entire material creation is based on mental concoction. The mind sometimes induces us to think that if we purchase an automobile we can enjoy the physical elements, such as earth, water, air and fire, combined in forms of iron, plastic, petrol and so on. Working with the five material elements ( pañca-bhūtas ), as well as with our five knowledge-gathering senses like the eyes, ears and tongue and our five active senses like the hands and legs, we become involved in the material condition. Thus we are subjected to the tribulations known as adhyātmika, adhidaivika and adhibhautika. The mind is the center because the mind creates all these things. As soon as the material object is struck, however, the mind is affected, and we suffer. For example, with the material elements, the working senses and the knowledge-gathering senses we create a very nice car, and when the car is accidentally smashed in a collision, the mind suffers, and through the mind the living entity suffers.

The fact is that the living entity, while concocting with the mind, creates the material condition. Because matter is destructible, through the material condition the living entity suffers. Otherwise, the living entity is detached from all material conditions. When one comes to the Brahman platform, the platform of spiritual life, fully understanding that he is a spiritual soul ( ahaṁ brahmāsmi ), he is no longer affected by lamentation or hankering. As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (18.54) :

brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā na śocati na kāṅkṣati

“One who is thus transcendentally situated at once realizes the Supreme Brahman and becomes fully joyful. He never laments or desires to have anything.” Elsewhere in Bhagavad-gītā (15.7) the Lord says:

mamaivāṁśo jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ manaḥ-ṣaṣṭhānīndriyāṇi prakṛti-sthāni karṣati

“The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal fragmental parts. Due to conditioned life, they are struggling very hard with the six senses, which include the mind.” The living entity is actually part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and is unaffected by material conditions, but because the mind ( manaḥ ) is affected, the senses are affected, and the living entity struggles for existence within this material world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The body of the jīva who thinks he is the body is composed of the gross organs, the sense devatās and the senses. It is said that this body gives various types of suffering and pain to the jīva. It has been explained that attachment to objects is the cause of suffering. Now identification with the body is described. The body of the jīva who thinks he is the body is made of gross elements, sense devatās and the senses. [Note: See SB 2.5.19 and SB 2.10.13.]
The bodily-conception soul is absorbed in body, ten senses and mind; through the mind he interacts with the gross world. The architecture of bondage is described as ordinary perception.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I treat ordinary perception as direct truth rather than as a constructed interaction?
  • What practice can disrupt the default architecture even briefly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.26

↗
तस्मात् स्वस्थेन मनसा विमृश्य गतिमात्मन: । द्वैते ध्रुवार्थविश्रम्भं त्यजोपशममाविश ॥ २६ ॥
tasmāt svasthena manasā
[tasmaat svasthena manasaa]
vimṛśya gatim ātmanaḥ
[vimrishya gatim aatmanah]
dvaite dhruvārtha-viśrambhaṁ
[dvaite dhruvaartha-vishrambham]
tyajopaśamam āviśa
[tyajopashamam aavisha]
tasmāt — therefore svasthena — with a careful manasā — mind vimṛśya — considering gatim — real position ātmanaḥ — of yourself dvaite — in the duality dhruva — as permanent artha — object viśrambham — belief tyaja — give up upaśamam — a peaceful condition āviśa — take to.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasmāt svasthena manasā
tasmāt
therefore
svasthena
with a careful
manasā
mind
vimṛśya gatim ātmanaḥ
vimṛśya
considering
gatim
real position
ātmanaḥ
of yourself
dvaite dhruvārtha-viśrambhaṁ
dvaite
in the duality
dhruva
as permanent
artha
object
viśrambham
belief
tyajopaśamam āviśa
tyaja
give up
upaśamam
a peaceful condition
āviśa
take to.
Therefore, O King Citraketu, carefully consider the position of the ātmā. In other words, try to understand who you are — whether body, mind or soul. Consider where you have come from, where you are going after giving up this body, and why you are under the control of material lamentation. Try to understand your real position in this way, and then you will be able to give up your unnecessary attachment. You will also be able to give up the belief that this material world, or anything not directly in touch with service to Kṛṣṇa, is eternal. Thus you will obtain peace.

The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is factually endeavoring to bring human society to a sober condition. Because of a misdirected civilization, people are jumping in materialistic life like cats and dogs, performing all sorts of abominable, sinful actions and becoming increasingly entangled. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement includes self-realization because one is first directed by Lord Kṛṣṇa to understand that one is not the body but the owner of the body. When one understands this simple fact, he can direct himself toward the goal of life. Because people are not educated in terms of the goal of life, they are working like madmen and becoming more and more attached to the material atmosphere. The misguided man accepts the material condition as everlasting. One must give up his faith in material things and give up attachment for them. Then one will be sober and peaceful.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore, considering with steady mind the truth about the soul, give up faith that temporary objects are eternal in this world of duality and take shelter of detachment. With undisturbed mind consider the truth of the soul. Give up faith or affection, (viśrvambham) thinking that temporary objects are eternal (dhruva) in the world of duality, holding the conception of this world, me and my objects. Amara-koṣa says śāśvatas, dhruva, nitya, sadātana and sanātanā mean “eternal.” Take shelter (āviśa) of a peaceful mind.
Consider carefully who you are — body, mind, or soul — where you came from, where you go, and why grief has overtaken you. The sage hands the inquiry back to the patient.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I written down my own answers to those four questions?
  • Which answer is least examined?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.27

↗
श्रीनारद उवाच एतां मन्त्रोपनिषदं प्रतीच्छ प्रयतो मम । यां धारयन् सप्तरात्राद् द्रष्टा सङ्कर्षणं विभुम् ॥ २७ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
etāṁ mantropaniṣadaṁ
[etaam mantropanishadam]
pratīccha prayato mama
[prateechcha prayato mama]
yāṁ dhārayan sapta-rātrād
[yaam dhaarayan sapta-raatraad]
draṣṭā saṅkarṣaṇaṁ vibhum
[drashtaa sankarshanam vibhum]
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada Muni said etām — this mantra-upaniṣadam — Upaniṣad in the form of a mantra by which one can achieve the highest goal of life pratīccha — accept prayataḥ — with great attention (after finishing the funeral ceremony of your dead son) mama — from me yām — which dhārayan — accepting sapta-rātrāt — after seven nights draṣṭā — you will see saṅkarṣaṇam — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Saṅkarṣaṇa vibhum — the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada Muni said
etāṁ mantropaniṣadaṁ
etām
this
mantra-upaniṣadam
Upaniṣad in the form of a mantra by which one can achieve the highest goal of life
pratīccha prayato mama
pratīccha
accept
prayataḥ
with great attention (after finishing the funeral ceremony of your dead son)
mama
from me
yāṁ dhārayan sapta-rātrād
yām
which
dhārayan
accepting
sapta-rātrāt
after seven nights
draṣṭā saṅkarṣaṇaṁ vibhum
draṣṭā
you will see
saṅkarṣaṇam
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Saṅkarṣaṇa
vibhum
the Lord.
The great sage Nārada continued: My dear King, attentively receive from me a mantra, which is most auspicious. After accepting it from me, in seven nights you will be able to see the Lord face to face.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Attentively receive from me a mantra embodying the Upaniṣads. Meditating on it, after seven nights you will be able to see Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa. “What is the eternal object? Please tell me what it is.” Since Nārada was a great devotee, at the suggestion of Aṅgirā, he then spoke. “Accept this Upaniṣad in the form of a mantra.”
Receive this auspicious mantra from me; in seven nights you will see the Lord face to face. Real mantra has a real, time-bound promise.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I believe a mantra could deliver a vision in seven nights, or do I quietly doubt?
  • What would change in my chanting if I held that as possible?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 6.15.28

↗
यत्पादमूलमुपसृत्य नरेन्द्र पूर्वे शर्वादयो भ्रममिमं द्वितयं विसृज्य । सद्यस्तदीयमतुलानधिकं महित्वं प्रापुर्भवानपि परं न चिरादुपैति ॥ २८ ॥
yat-pāda-mūlam upasṛtya narendra pūrve
[yat-paada-moolam upasritya narendra poorve]
śarvādayo bhramam imaṁ dvitayaṁ visṛjya
[sharvaadayo bhramam imam dvitayam visrijya]
sadyas tadīyam atulānadhikaṁ mahitvaṁ
[sadyas tadeeyam atulaanadhikam mahitvam]
prāpur bhavān api paraṁ na cirād upaiti
[praapur bhavaan api param na chiraad upaiti]
yat-pāda-mūlam — the lotus feet of whom (Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa) upasṛtya — obtaining shelter at nara-indra — O King pūrve — formerly śarva-ādayaḥ — great demigods like Lord Mahādeva bhramam — illusion imam — this dvitayam — consisting of duality visṛjya — giving up sadyaḥ — immediately tadīyam — His atula — unequaled anadhikam — unsurpassed mahitvam — glories prāpuḥ — achieved bhavān — yourself api — also param — the supreme abode na — not cirāt — after a long time upaiti — will obtain.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yat-pāda-mūlam upasṛtya narendra pūrve
yat-pāda-mūlam
the lotus feet of whom (Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa)
upasṛtya
obtaining shelter at
nara-indra
O King
pūrve
formerly
śarvādayo bhramam imaṁ dvitayaṁ visṛjya
śarva-ādayaḥ
great demigods like Lord Mahādeva
bhramam
illusion
imam
this
dvitayam
consisting of duality
visṛjya
giving up
sadyas tadīyam atulānadhikaṁ mahitvaṁ
sadyaḥ
immediately
tadīyam
His
atula
unequaled
anadhikam
unsurpassed
mahitvam
glories
prāpur bhavān api paraṁ na cirād upaiti
prāpuḥ
achieved
bhavān
yourself
api
also
param
the supreme abode
na
not
cirāt
after a long time
upaiti
will obtain.
My dear King, in former days Lord Śiva and other demigods took shelter of the lotus feet of Saṅkarṣaṇa. Thus they immediately got free from the illusion of duality and achieved unequaled and unsurpassed glories in spiritual life. You will very soon attain that very same position.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Sixth Canto, Fifteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Saints Nārada and Aṅgirā Instruct King Citraketu.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear King, in former days Lord Śiva and other devatās, taking shelter of the lotus feet of Saṅkarṣaṇa, immediately got free from the illusion of duality and achieved unequaled and unsurpassed glory. You will very soon attain that very same position. Bhramam means “bewildering.” Dvitayam means duality. Upaiti should be upaiṣyati (you will attain). Thus ends the commentary on the Fifteenth Chapter of the Sixth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Sixteen Citraketu Receives Instructions 6.16: King Citraketu Meets the Supreme Lord 16. King Citraketu Meets the Supreme Lord 6.16 Summary As related in this chapter, Citraketu was able to talk with his dead son and hear from him the truth of life. When Citraketu was appeased, the great sage Nārada gave him a mantra, and by chanting this mantra Citraketu found shelter at the lotus feet of Saṅkarṣaṇa. The living entity is eternal. Thus he has neither birth nor death (na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre [Bg. 2.20]). According to the reactions of one's fruitive activities, one takes birth in various species of life among the birds, beasts, trees, human beings, demigods and so on, thus rotating through various bodies. For a certain period of time, one receives a particular type of body as a son or father in a false relationship. All our relationships in this material world with friends, relatives or enemies consist of duality, in which one feels happy and distressed on the basis of illusion. The living entity is actually a spiritual soul who is part and parcel of God and has nothing to do with relationships in the world of duality. Therefore Nārada Muni advised Citraketu not to lament for his so-called dead son. After hearing instructions from their dead child, Citraketu and his wife could understand that all relationships in this material world are causes of misery. The queens who had administered poison to the son of Kṛtadyuti were very much ashamed. They atoned for the sinful act of killing a child and gave up their aspiration to have sons. Thereafter. Nārada Muni chanted prayers to Nārāyaṇa, who exists as catur-vyūha, and instructed Citraketu about the Supreme Lord, who creates, maintains and annihilates everything and who is the master of the material nature. After instructing King Citraketu in this way, he returned to Brahmaloka. These instructions about the Absolute Truth are called the mahā-vidyā. After being initiated by Nārada Muni, King Citraketu chanted the mahā-vidyā, and after one week he attained the presence of Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa, who was surrounded by the four Kumāras. The Lord was nicely dressed in bluish garments, with a helmet and ornaments of gold. His face appeared very happy. In the presence of Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa, Citraketu offered his obeisances and began to offer prayers. In his prayers, Citraketu said that millions of universes rest in the pores of Saṅkarṣaṇa, who is limitless, having no beginning and end. The Lord is well known to the devotees for His eternity. The difference between worshiping the Lord and worshiping the demigods is that the worshiper of the Lord also becomes eternal, whereas whatever benedictions one can get from the demigods are impermanent. Unless one becomes a devotee, one cannot understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead. After Citraketu finished his prayers, the unlimited Supreme Lord explained knowledge of Himself to Citraketu.
Long ago Śiva and others took shelter of Saṅkarṣaṇa's feet and were instantly freed from dualistic illusion. The path the high beings used is also yours to use.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose footsteps would I most want to walk in, and what shelter did they take?
  • Am I willing to take the same shelter without inventing a 'newer' one?
📝 My note