FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

10.57 · Satrājit Murdered, the Jewel Returned

39 verses · 🖨 Class prep
A Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (26101 chars)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) In Dwaraka, Krishna exhibited His strength by fighting and winning many battles, but in one unique instance, He and Balarama fled from Jarasandha Krishna’s foremost queens were Rukmini and Satyabhama, but He also married 16,100 queens after freeing them from Narakasura. Narada visited Krishna’s 16,108 palaces and was astonished by His daily activities in Dwaraka. Meanwhile, Balarama visited Gokula and enjoyed rasa-lila , and later threatened the Kurus by dragging Hastinapura towards the Yamuna.

Previous The Mood of Sri Chaitanya Next Rana-Chor Lila Last updated 1 year ago

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) In Dwaraka, Krishna exhibited His strength by fighting and winning many battles, but in one unique instance, He and Balarama fled from Jarasandha Krishna’s foremost queens were Rukmini and Satyabhama, but He also married 16,100 queens after freeing them from Narakasura. Narada visited Krishna’s 16,108 palaces and was astonished by His daily activities in Dwaraka. Meanwhile, Balarama visited Gokula and enjoyed rasa-lila , and later threatened the Kurus by dragging Hastinapura towards the Yamuna.

Previous The Mood of Sri Chaitanya Next Rana-Chor Lila Last updated 1 year ago

Balarama in Vrindavana

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Balarama in Vrindavana Chapter 65 Balarama went to visit the residents of Vrindavana for two months, consoled them in their separation from Krishna, and performed His own rasa-lila. Once, whilst intoxicated by Varuni, He commanded the Yamuna to come closer so He could bathe in her waters with the gopis . When she refused, Balarama wielded His plow and dragged her, splitting the river into hundreds of tributaries. She then apologised, and Balarama enjoyed sporting in her waters.

Previous Nriga Delivered Next Killing More Demons Last updated 2 years ago

Banasura Defeated

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Banasura Defeated Chapter 62, 63 Bali Maharaja married Rukmini’s daughter, Charumati, and had a son named Banasura. Banasura was devoted to Siva, and received the benediction that Siva would personally protect his city. With the strength of one thousand arms, his pride swelled and Siva thus predicted his downfall. Once, Banasura’s daughter, Usa, was having intimate dreams of Aniruddha, the son of Pradyumna. Usa’s maidservant, Chitralekha, identified Aniruddha and brought him there by her mystic power. Usa and Aniruddha united, but when Banasura learned of this he angrily captured that grandson of Krishna. In retaliation, Krishna and Balarama gathered the Yadava armies and attacked Banasura. After an epic duel involving Lord Siva (who had vowed to protect Banasura’s city), all but four of Banasura’s arms were severed and he finally surrendered to Krishna, who spared his life. Usa and Aniruddha were thus brought safely back to Dwaraka.

Previous Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Next Nriga Delivered Last updated 2 years ago

Dhama Comparison

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison “In Krishna Book, Srila Prabhupada beautifully describes the city of Dwaraka as follows: “Being inquisitive as to how Krishna was managing His household affairs with so many wives, Narada desired to see these pastimes and so set out to visit Krishna’s different homes. When Narada arrived in Dwaraka, he saw that the gardens and parks were full of various flowers of different colours and orchards that were overloaded with a variety of fruits. Beautiful birds were chirping, and peacocks were delightfully crowing. There were tanks and ponds full of blue and red lotus flowers, and some of these sites were filled with varieties of lilies. The lakes were full of nice swans and cranes, whose voices resounded everywhere. In the city there were as many as 900,000 great palaces built of first-class marble, with gates and doors made of silver. The posts of the houses and palaces were bedecked with jewels such as touchstone, sapphires and emeralds, and the floors gave off a beautiful luster. The highways, lanes, streets, crossings and marketplaces were all beautifully decorated. The whole city was full of residential homes, assembly houses and temples, all of different architectural beauty. All of this made Dwaraka a glowing city. The big avenues, crossings, lanes and streets, and also the thresholds of every residential house, were very clean. On both sides of every path there were bushes, and at regular intervals there were large trees that shaded the avenues so that the sunshine would not bother the passersby.”” ( SB 10.69.1-6 )

Previous Dwaraka Palaces Next The Lost City Last updated 1 year ago

Habits of Successful Pilgrims

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison Habits of Successful Pilgrims Sacred sites have to be seen with eyes of devotion. This can be difficult because externally there is heart-wrenching poverty, decrepit infrastructure and widespread pollution. Thus, it is always recommended that one visit holy places in the company of mature devotees of Krishna. They help us to go beyond superficiality and actually see the heart of these places. The Srimad-Bhagavatam offers further guidance on conducting a successful pilgrimage. In Canto Three , we learn about Vidura, who left the palaces of Hastinapura and set off on a pilgrimage to spiritually nourish himself. Elements of his attitude are described: “While so traversing the earth, he simply performed duties to please the Supreme Lord Hari. His occupation was pure and independent. He was constantly sanctified by taking his bath in holy places, although he was in the dress of a mendicant and had no hair dressing nor a bed on which to lie. Thus he was always unseen by his various relatives.” (SB 3.1.19) Independence (vivikta-vrtti) – was not thinking of business, security and maintenance, or disturbed by thoughts of what is happening back home. Sanctification (apluta) – was eager to be purified by honouring prasadam, bathing in rivers, and associating with Vaisnavas (i.e. not just sightseeing). Simplicity (adha-sayana) – embraced a life of simplicity, and accepted the austerities of pilgrimage as part of the experience to come closer to God. Detachment (avadhuta-vesa) – remained aloof to external arrangements and appearance, with a view to shifting the emphasis on internal consciousness. Unseen (alaksita) – avoided bringing attention to himself, or attracting praise, honour and respect. Alone (sva) – remained socially aloof and did not travel with others who may disturb him from his spiritual focus. Vows (vrata) – accepted spiritual vows and commitments that would give him focus on his journey. Dedication (hari-tosana) – dedicated all his time, energy and efforts toward pleasing Hari. Anyone who conducts their pilgrimage with such disposition will undoubtedly accrue great spiritual benefits on their journey.

Previous Spiritual Hubs Next The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Spiritual Hubs

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison Spiritual Hubs Places like Dwaraka are not merely historical sites, but living spiritual hubs. In the broad Vedic tradition, followers of sanatana-dharma visit four main places in India, known as the char-dhama. Badrinath in North India, Ramesvaram in South India, Jagannatha Puri in East India, and Dwaraka in West India. For Gaudiya Vaisnavas, Vrindavana, Mayapur and Jagannatha Puri are considered the primary holy places. Vrindavana is the place where Krishna performed His sweet, youthful pastimes, and revealed the most intimate aspects of His personality while relating to His confidential devotees. Though He externally left Vrindavana, the deeper understanding is that Krishna is ever-present in that land. Mayapur is the landmark of Sri Chaitanya’s appearance and early pastimes. Most notably, it’s the place where the sankirtana movement began, as the Lord gathered thousands of locals in chanting and dancing in pure love of God. Jagannatha Puri is home to the form of the Lord whose dilated eyes reveal His ecstatic remembrance of the gopis of Vrindavana. This is where Sri Chaitanya spent the second half of His life, surrounded by His confidential associates, internally relishing the esoteric emotions of Srimati Radharani. Srila Prabhupada, by his transcendental vision and desire, was able to replicate these places in the western world. He established ‘New Vrindavana,’ ‘New Mayapur,’ ‘New Jagannatha Puri,’ and many other spiritual communities, which remain great sources of spiritual inspiration even today. Every holy place carries unlimited potential to connect the sincere pilgrim with God. They are extraordinary places brimming with spiritual energy and blessings for all. Elaborate worship takes place in temples that bustle with pilgrims; constant devotional chanting fills the atmosphere at all hours. These are cities that never sleep! The daily sights and sounds remind us of God. Pilgrimages afford us the opportunity to associate with saintly people, help us develop a personal connection with God, and inspire us to go deeper into our spiritual practices. Srila Prabhupada explains that anyone who circumambulates these holy places becomes free from the cycle of repeated birth and death in this material world. In fact, all benefits derived from spiritual activities multiply manifold in these holy places. Though externally they may not seem to be the same places they were thousands of years ago, spiritually they remain untouched and ever-powerful. The holy dhama is permeated with two energies ( sakti ):

Taraka-sakti – that energy which liberates us from material attachments

Paraka-sakti – that energy which impels and draws us towards Krishna

The dhama also has a covering potency which prevents materialistic persons from perceiving its beauty and sweetness. Only with a humble spirit and sincere desire can one penetrate that covering and access the other two energies.

Previous The Lost City Next Habits of Successful Pilgrims Last updated 1 year ago

The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam After Krishna’s departure from the world, the queens of Dwaraka were feeling deep separation. They came to Vrindavana and took shelter of Vajranabha, Krishna’s great-grandson. There, in the holy dhama , they came across Kalindi, a co-wife of Krishna who seemed to be coping quite well. When they enquired how she dealt with the pain of Krishna’s departure and the subsequent separation, she explained the remedy: “When the gopis were feeling intense separation from Krishna, Uddhava pacified them with His words. So you can also go to Uddhava and request the same.” Hearing that Uddhava had been granted eternal residence in the Govardhana area, they set off to find him. In the association of Maharaja Pariksit and Vajranabha, and accompanied by a tumultuous kirtan , they arrived at Kusum Sarovar. Uddhava, who looked identical to Krishna, suddenly emerged from the groves. He empathised with the distress of the queens and explained to them that although Krishna had concluded His pastimes and left this world, He could still be seen in another way – through the narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Uddhava narrated how the Lord had previously imparted the Srimad- Bhagavatam to Brahma, Vishnu and Siva, who each established their own recitals of Bhagavatam. Feeling inspired, Uddhava offered to recite Srimad- Bhagavatam to the queens. First, however, he requested Maharaja Pariksit to keep Kali at bay while the recital was going on. Maharaja Pariksit was happy to serve but disappointed by the fact that he would not be able to hear the narrations himself. Uddhava reassured him that Sukadeva Goswami would recite Srimad-Bhagavatam to him in the near future, and as a result many generations of living entities would also have that privilege too. Vajranabha remained with his mothers, and they all heard the nectarean topics flow from the mouth of Uddhava for one month. Absorbed in that sweet vibration, they became completely mesmerised, disappeared from everyone’s vision, and returned to the Supreme Abode. [ 33 ]

Previous Habits of Successful Pilgrims Next D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Last updated 1 year ago

The Lost City

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison The Lost City “Now due to the brahmanas ’ curse the Yadu dynasty will certainly perish by fighting among themselves; and on the seventh day from today the ocean will rise up and inundate this city of Dwaraka.” ( SB 11.7.3 ) After Krishna completed His pastimes in Dwaraka, the city disappeared below the sea and became invisible to human vision. In recent years, however, the legendary city of Dwaraka has received significant attention from historians, archaeologists and academics. Underwater excavations have revealed the remains of ancient structures, sculptures and artifacts, indicating that the accounts of the Vedic literatures are not merely mythological. Scientific analysis and carbon dating has revealed an incredible correlation between the ancient descriptions of Dwaraka, and the scientific findings of marine archaeologists. Graham Hancock, an author who has produced several documentaries on uncovering ancient civilisations, stated that the evidence was compelling: “There’s a huge chronological problem in this discovery. It means that the whole model of the origins of civilisation with which archaeologists have been working will have to be remade from scratch.”

Previous Dhama Comparison Next Spiritual Hubs Last updated 1 year ago

Dwaraka Palaces

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dwaraka Palaces Chapter 69, 70 Dwaraka, crafted by the celestial architect, Visvakarma, was opulent beyond belief and charming in all respects. After marrying 16,108 princesses, Krishna created an exquisite palace for each one of them. Fascinated by this, Narada Muni personally went to witness Krishna’s daily activities in each palace. When Krishna saw Narada, He heartily welcomed and worshipped the sage. As Narada travelled from palace to palace he was honoured in the same way, and amazed by Krishna’s routine, which resembled that of a perfect, pious householder. Everything from fulfilling family duties, performing religious rituals, and observing social traditions was carefully honoured by the Lord. One day, news arrived of how Jarasandha had captured and imprisoned thousands of kings. They were pleading for the Lord’s merciful intervention. Simultaneously, Narada arrived with the message that the Pandavas’ were soon performing the Rajasuya sacrifice and requesting Krishna’s presence at the event. Desiring to satisfy both parties, Krishna turned to Uddhava for advice.

Previous Samba’s Marriage Next Dhama Comparison Last updated 2 years ago

History of Pradyumna

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) History of Pradyumna Chapter 55 After being burned to death by Rudra’s anger, Kamadeva was reborn as Pradyumna, the son of Krishna and Rukmini. In the maternity room, however, he was kidnapped by the demon Sambara and thrown into the ocean. A fish unexpectedly swallowed Pradyumna, and later that fish was caught and given to Sambara’s cooks. Astonishingly, they found a child in the belly, and gave him to Mayavati. Kamadeva’s previous wife, Rati, was reborn as Mayavati, and was a cook for Sambara. She was actually waiting for her husband to appear in his new body. Later, she requested Pradyumna to marry her, and advised him to also kill Sambara. Pradyumna did both, and together with his wife went to Dwaraka, where all the inhabitants were enchanted by his beauty. Rukmini was especially overjoyed to be reunited with her son.

Previous Rukmini and Krishna Next The Syamantaka Jewel Last updated 2 years ago

Killing More Demons

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Killing More Demons Chapter 66, 67 Paundraka : Illusioned by the false praise of others, this proud demon claimed to be the ‘real’ Krishna and audaciously invited the Lord for battle. Krishna journeyed to Kasi, where He found Paundraka who had incredulously imitated the Lord’s external appearance. Krishna laughed at the sight, destroyed his armies, and then cut off the imposter’s head. Kasiraja, a supporter of Paundraka, was also killed. Sudaksina : Kasiraja’s son, Sudaksina, created a fierce demon to avenge his father’s death. When the demon arrived in Dwaraka, the incredible heat of Krishna’s Sudarshan Chakra drove the demon back to Varanasi, where he killed his own creator, Sudaksina. Dvivida : This wicked ape was annoyed by Krishna’s killing of Narakasura. In retaliation, he destroyed parts of Anarta (Krishna’s province), and severely harassed the residents. Once, he encountered Balarama enjoying His pastimes, and disturbed the entire ambience with obscene gestures and vulgar behaviour. A fight ensued in which they repeatedly struck each other with uprooted trees, until Balarama eventually killed him.

Previous Balarama in Vrindavana Next Samba’s Marriage Last updated 2 years ago

Marrying Princesses

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Marrying Princesses Chapter 58, 59 When Krishna went to meet the Pandavas in Indraprastha (after their incognito exile), they had many loving interactions. During that time, Krishna accepted Kalindi as His wife and brought her back to Dwaraka. Later, Krishna married Mitravinda from Avantipura, Nagnajiti from Ayodhya, Laksmana from Madra and Bhadra from Kaikeya. Narakasura, also known as Bhaumasura, had created a series of disturbances to the demigods, and Indra thus requested Krishna’s help to kill him. Krishna first decapitated the Mura demon with His Sudarshan Chakra, and then ended the lives of his seven demoniac sons. When He confronted Narakasura, the demon launched a trident attack, but Krishna dodged it and beheaded him as well. Relieved of the burden, Goddess Bhumi profusely thanked Krishna with beautiful poetry. When the Lord freed the 16,100 imprisoned maidens from Narakasura’s palace, they all desired Him as their husband, so Krishna sent them to Dwaraka. Thereafter, Krishna went to Indraloka to acquire the parijata tree that Satyabhama desired. Despite Krishna’s recent merciful intervention to save Indra from the demons, the demigod wasn’t willing to give that tree, and Krishna had to fight him to secure it! Later, Krishna married the 16,100 princesses and provided each one with a beautiful palace.

Previous The Syamantaka Jewel Next Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Last updated 2 years ago

Nriga Delivered

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Nriga Delivered Chapter 64 Krishna’s son, Samba, once found a lizard in a well and unsuccessfully tried to rescue it. Later, however, by the transcendental touch of Krishna, the lizard transformed into a demigod. The divine being was Nriga, who, in a previous life, accidently donated the cow of one brahmana to another brahmana . Despite offering them both one hundred thousand cows to reclaim that one cow, neither brahmana was willing to relinquish it, and Nriga remained implicated. At death, Yamaraja declared that Nriga would have to live one life as a lizard. Although the punishment was harsh, he was blessed to have an audience with the Lord. Krishna thus highlighted the grave danger in unlawfully claiming a brahmana’s property.

Previous Banasura Defeated Next Balarama in Vrindavana Last updated 2 years ago

Rana-Chor Lila

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rana-Chor Lila Chapter 52 After transporting the Yadavas to Dwaraka, Krishna returned to Mathura to defeat the formidable army of Yavanas. Just then, the constantly-failing Jarasandha, arrived with yet more soldiers. Krishna made a unique decision to flee the battlefield! He and Balarama climbed to the top of Pravarsana mountain, and Jarasandha ignited a fire all around. The wicked King was convinced They were dead, but in actuality the two brothers bamboozled him by leaping to safety and mystically re-entering Dwaraka. This was yet another playful activity of the Lord, for Jarasandha would be killed in an ingenious way later.

Previous A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Next Rukmini and Krishna Last updated 2 years ago

Rukmini and Krishna

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rukmini and Krishna Chapter 52, 53, 54 Relishing the pastimes of Krishna, Maharaja Pariksit eagerly enquired about how Rukmini married Him. Sukadeva Goswami, equally as eager, narrated the dramatic story. Rukmi had planned for his sister to marry Sisupala. After repeatedly hearing about Krishna, however, Rukmini had given her heart to Him. She immediately sent a love letter requesting Krishna to kidnap her so she could become His first wife. Conquered by Rukmini’s words, Krishna immediately travelled to Vidarbha, where Damaghosa (Sisupala’s father) and Bhismaka (Rukmini’s father) had arranged for the marriage celebrations. Various kings had arrived, poised to fight anyone who attempted to disturb the ceremony. Anticipating some friction, Balarama also arrived there with His armies. A brahmana messenger arrived on the eve of the wedding and informed Rukmini that Krishna would indeed come. The next day, when Rukmini came out for a customary pre-marriage procession, Krishna expertly kidnapped her. A violent fight ensued, but the heroic Yadavas fended off all attacks and escaped with Rukmini, just as a lion captures its prey even amidst jackals. Jarasandha consoled Sisupala, but the enraged Rukmi decided to attack Krishna again. His attempt was unsuccessful, and Krishna instead captured the envious Rukmi and prepared to kill him. Rukmini hastily intervened to save her brother, and Krishna concluded the matter by cutting his hair and thus humiliating him. In this way, after a string of dramatic events, Krishna and Rukmini were finally married.

Previous Rana-Chor Lila Next History of Pradyumna Last updated 2 years ago

Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Chapter 60, 61 Once, while she was lovingly serving Him, Krishna teased Rukmini and told her she had made a huge mistake by marrying Him. Krishna bluntly submitted that He was deficient in character, qualification and love for her. Hearing these painful words, Rukmini fainted in disbelief, overcome by unhappiness and fear. Seeing her reaction, Krishna immediately pacified her and explained He was only speaking in jest. Rukmini glorified the qualities of Krishna that had captured her mind, and Krishna subsequently expressed His deep appreciation for her. Krishna’s descendants expanded to thousands when each of His queens had ten sons. In response to Maharaja Pariksit’s enquiry, Sukadeva Goswami explained why Rukmi offered his daughter to Krishna’s son, despite their enmity. Though Rukmi was inimical to Krishna, his daughter, Rukmavati, wanted to marry Pradyumna (son of Rukmini and Krishna). Since she personally chose him, and Pradyumna valiantly fought off all the opponents, Rukmi acquiesced, and the couple eventually had a son named Aniruddha. Rukmi gave his grand- daughter in marriage to Aniruddha. After that wedding, Balarama and Rukmi played a game of dice, which led to a heated argument and the eventual death of Rukmi. Balarama then took Aniruddha and his wife to Dwaraka.

Previous Marrying Princesses Next Banasura Defeated Last updated 2 years ago

Samba’s Marriage

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Samba’s Marriage Chapter 68 After Samba had kidnapped Duryodhana’s daughter, Laksmana, the Kaurava armies unfairly captured him and returned to Hastinapura. The Yadavas were ready to attack, but Balarama tried to diffuse the conflict with a peace proposal. Afflicted by deep-rooted pride, the Kauravas rejected it outright, and Balarama fiercely attacked them by dragging Hastinapura toward the Ganges. Terrified, the Kauravas quickly handed over Samba and Laksmana, who were duly married and sent to Dwaraka.

Previous Killing More Demons Next Dwaraka Palaces Last updated 2 years ago

The Syamantaka Jewel

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) The Syamantaka Jewel Chapter 56, 57 When Maharaja Pariksit enquired about the Syamantaka Jewel, Sukadeva Goswami narrated further. King Satrajit had received the Syamantaka jewel from the sun-god. Whoever possessed the jewel was blessed with wealth and wellbeing, and the King had thus installed it in his home in Dwaraka. When Krishna requested him to gift the jewel to Ugrasena, the greedy Satrajit refused. Once, Satrajit’s brother, Prasena, was travelling with the jewel. He was killed by a lion and stripped of the jewel, and the lion subsequently lost the jewel to Jambavan, who gave it to his son. Unaware of these events, Satrajit incorrectly accused Krishna of killing Prasena and taking the jewel. Krishna searched out the jewel, found it in Jambavan’s cave, and had a twenty- eight-day fight with that mighty warrior to retrieve it. Jambavan, at heart a devotee, finally accepted Krishna’s supremacy and offered Him the jewel along with his daughter, Jambavati. Krishna then returned to Dwaraka and handed the jewel back to Satrajit. Feeling remorseful, the King handed the jewel back to Krishna and offered his daughter, Satyabhama, in marriage. Krishna happily married his daughter but insisted that Satrajit keep the jewel. While Krishna was out of Dwaraka, Satadhanva, who was incited by Akrura and Krtavarma, killed Satrajit and stole the jewel. When Krishna returned, He tracked down Satadhanva and killed him, but couldn’t find the jewel since Satadhanva had left it with Akrura. Krishna eventually located it and showed it to His relatives, but then returned the troublesome jewel to Akrura.

Previous History of Pradyumna Next Marrying Princesses Last updated 2 years ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.1

↗
श्रीबादरायणिरुवाच विज्ञातार्थोऽपि गोविन्दो दग्धानाकर्ण्य पाण्डवान् । कुन्तीं च कुल्यकरणे सहरामो ययौ कुरून् ॥ १ ॥
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
[shree-baadaraayanir uvaacha]
vijñātārtho ’pi govindo
[vijnaataartho ’pi govindo]
dagdhān ākarṇya pāṇḍavān
[dagdhaan aakarnya paandavaan]
kuntīṁ ca kulya-karaṇe
[kunteem cha kulya-karane]
saha-rāmo yayau kurūn
[saha-raamo yayau kuroon]
śrī - bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Badarāyaṇa, said vijñāta — aware arthaḥ — of the facts api — although govindaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa dagdhān — burned to death ākarṇya — hearing pāṇḍavān — the sons of Pāṇḍu kuntīm — their mother, Kuntī ca — and kulya — family obligations karaṇe — to carry out saha - rāmaḥ — together with Lord Balarāma yayau — went kurūn — to the kingdom of the Kurus .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bādarāyaṇir uvāca
śrī - bādarāyaṇiḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Badarāyaṇa, said
vijñātārtho ’pi govindo
vijñāta
aware
arthaḥ
of the facts
dagdhān ākarṇya pāṇḍavān
api
although
govindaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
dagdhān
burned to death
kuntīṁ ca kulya-karaṇe
ākarṇya
hearing
pāṇḍavān
the sons of Pāṇḍu
kuntīm
their mother, Kuntī
ca
and
saha-rāmo yayau kurūn
kulya
family obligations
karaṇe
to carry out
saha - rāmaḥ
together with Lord Balarāma
yayau
went
kurūn
to the kingdom of the Kurus .
  • vijñāta — aware (of what had actually happened)
    Past participle of vi-√jñā. The first word of the chapter installs Kṛṣṇa's sarvajñatā as the frame for everything that follows. Whatever He does next — grieving, pursuing, conciliating — is done in full knowledge, not as discovery.
  • govindaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa, who gives pleasure to the cows and the senses
    Go (cows / senses / earth) + vinda (one who finds / pleases). Gauḍīyas insist on the Vraja-flavored name even in political contexts: the Lord who is dealing with Kuru affairs is the same boy who tends Nanda's cows.
  • kulya - karaṇe — for the performance of family obligations
    Compound: kulya (pertaining to the family) + karaṇa (carrying out). Bhagavān honors kinship duties though He stands above all duty. Gauḍīyas read this as Kṛṣṇa's līlā of consenting to be related — the same consent that makes Yaśodā His mother.
  • saha - rāmaḥ — together with Lord Balarāma
    Compound: saha (with) + rāmaḥ (Balarāma). Throughout this chapter the two brothers move as a pair — Gauḍīya theology reads Balarāma as Kṛṣṇa's first expansion (mūla-saṅkarṣaṇa); their inseparability is doctrinal, not merely affectionate.
Śrī Bādarāyaṇi said: Although Lord Govinda was fully aware of what had actually occurred, when He heard reports that the Pāṇḍavas and Queen Kuntī had burned to death, He went with Lord Balarāma to the kingdom of the Kurus to fulfill the family obligations expected of Him.

The Lord was quite aware that the Pāṇḍavas had escaped the assassination plot of Duryodhana, although the world heard the false news that the Pāṇḍavas and their mother had perished in the fire.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Bādarāyaṇi said: Although Lord Govinda was fully aware of what had actually occurred, when He heard reports that the Pāṇḍavas and Queen Kuntī had burned to death, He went with Lord Balarāma to the kingdom of the Kurus to fulfill the family obligations expected of Him.
Commentary

The fifth seventh chapter describes the killing of Satrajit, Krsna killng Satadhanva, and receiving the jewel from Akrura. As the jewel was the cause of the death of Satrajit, the lesson taught is that the object which is ordinarily ones protector can also kill one, if one offends Krsna.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Śrīdhara Svāmī summarizes the chapter. After clearing his defamation caused by the death of Śatadhanvā and Akrūra taking the jewel, Kṛṣṇa accepted Akrūra in his mind. Ascertaining the news of Hastināpura by private consultation, Kṛṣṇa with Balarāma went to Hastināpura. Of course, not just clearing his bad name, Kṛṣṇa made himself famous by his actions in this pastime. Kṛṣṇa understood the facts since he is the controller of the senses (govindaḥ). He went because of family obligations, as part of his pastimes. The word rāmaḥ suggests he actually went to please his devotees.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa understood the facts since he is the controller of the senses (govindaḥ). He is the antaryāmī of all beings. He went because of family obligations. The word rāmaḥ suggests they actually went to please the devotees. Govinda also means that he protects the cows. This suggests he is affectionate to his devotees. Thus he went for protecting the Pāṇḍavas.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Though Govinda is fully aware of what occurred, hearing reports that the Pāṇḍavas and Kuntī burned to death, He goes with Balarāma to the Kurus' kingdom. Even the all-knowing Lord performs ritual response to public reports; theology coexists with social participation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you skip ritual response because 'you already know'?
  • How does showing up in scripted ways honor the social fabric?

Kṛṣṇa already knows the Pāṇḍavas survived the lac house, yet He travels to Hastināpura and grieves with the elders — the way a father plays along with a child's hide-and-seek though He saw the hiding from the beginning. Bhagavān's omniscience does not cancel His participation; it perfects it.

Vidura's warning at the lac house

In the Mahābhārata's Ādi-parva, Vidura sent a tunneller and a coded message to the Pāṇḍavas before Duryodhana's wax palace was set ablaze. Kuntī and her five sons escaped through the earth while another family's bodies were mistaken for theirs.

Gauḍīyas read Kṛṣṇa's visit in this verse against that backdrop: He knew the rescue, He knew Vidura's hand in it, and still He came to weep with Bhīṣma and Gāndhārī. Lokavat — He behaves like a kinsman because kinship is the rasa He is cultivating.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.2

↗
भीष्मं कृपं सविदुरं गान्धारीं द्रोणमेव च । तुल्यदु:खौ च सङ्गम्य हा कष्टमिति होचतु: ॥ २ ॥
bhīṣmaṁ kṛpaṁ sa viduraṁ
[bheeshmam kripam sa viduram]
gāndhārīṁ droṇam eva ca
[gaandhaareem dronam eva cha]
tulya-duḥkhau ca saṅgamya
[tulya-duhkhau cha sangamya]
hā kaṣṭam iti hocatuḥ
[haa kashtam iti hochatuh]
bhīṣmam — Bhīṣma kṛpam — Ācārya Kṛpa sa - viduram — and also Vidura gāndhārīm — Gāndhārī, the wife of Dhṛtarāṣṭra droṇam — Ācārya Droṇa eva ca — as well tulya — equally duḥkhau — sorrowful ca — and saṅgamya — meeting with hā — alas kaṣṭam — how painful iti — thus ha ūcatuḥ — They spoke .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhīṣmaṁ kṛpaṁ sa viduraṁ
bhīṣmam
Bhīṣma
kṛpam
Ācārya Kṛpa
sa - viduram
and also Vidura
gāndhārīṁ droṇam eva ca
gāndhārīm
Gāndhārī, the wife of Dhṛtarāṣṭra
droṇam
Ācārya Droṇa
eva ca
as well
tulya-duḥkhau ca saṅgamya
tulya
equally
duḥkhau
sorrowful
ca
and
saṅgamya
meeting with
hā kaṣṭam iti hocatuḥ
hā
alas
kaṣṭam
how painful
iti
thus
ha ūcatuḥ
They spoke .
  • bhīṣmam — Bhīṣma
    Grandsire of the Kurus, one of the twelve mahājanas (SB 6.3.20). Gauḍīyas hold him as a paramount śānta- and dāsya-bhakta whose śara-śayyā discourse at SB 1.9 is the canonical death-meditation on Kṛṣṇa.
  • tulya - duḥkhau — both equally sorrowful
    Compound: tulya (equal) + duḥkhau (sorrowful, dual). Bhagavān matches the grief of His devotees down to the measure. Gauḍīyas read this as the precise mechanism of Kṛṣṇa's bhakta-vātsalya — He does not stand outside their pain, He stands level with it.
  • hā kaṣṭam — alas, how painful
    The lament idiom of human grief, placed in Kṛṣṇa's mouth. Acintya-bhedābheda at the level of language: the Supreme says exactly what a stricken nephew would say, without thereby ceasing to be the Supreme.
The two Lords met with Bhīṣma, Kṛpa, Vidura, Gāndhārī and Droṇa. Showing sorrow equal to theirs, They cried out, “Alas, how painful this is!”

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī points out that those who were involved in the assassination attempt were of course not at all sorry to hear of the Pāṇḍavas’ death. The persons specifically mentioned here, however — Bhīṣma, Kṛpa, Vidura, Gāndhārī and Droṇa — were actually unhappy to hear of the supposed tragedy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The two Lords met with Bhīṣma, Kṛpa, Vidura, Gāndhārī and Droṇa. Showing sorrow equal to theirs, They cried out, "Alas, how painful this is!"
Commentary

Though knowing that the Pandavas had escaped through a tunnel, hearing that the Pandavas and Kunti were burned, he went to the Kurus to perform the necessary rites.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Bhīṣma is described with Vidura (sa-viduram) since they had similar desires or were both devotees of Kṛṣṇa. Or that day they by chance were together. Bhīṣma is mentioned first because they met Bhīṣma first, since he was most respected. The others are in the order that they met them on the path. The two, as well as Vidura (who also knew the truth), imitated grief like the others. Gathering with them, they all cried loudly (ha).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

By showing conviction that the Pāṇḍavas were burned, evil Duryodhana hoped that attempts to find news of the Pāṇḍavas living would cease. The word ca indicates all the persons mentioned and Dhṛtarāṣṭra and others. Even Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma (ca) lamented. Vidura is mentioned with Bhīṣma and Kṛpa because he wanted to comfort them. Or he is mentioned as a secondary figure because he was a devotee in that group. Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma are mentioned at the end to show that they showed equal sorrow with Bhīṣma and others. Gathering with them they cried out loudly (hā). The elders such as Bhīṣma are mentioned first. Gāndhārī was superior to Droṇa. Because he came later, Kṛpa is considered inferior.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Pratijna (Vow-keeping / Sacred Resolve)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The Lords meet Bhīṣma, Kṛpa, Vidura, Gāndhārī, Droṇa, showing sorrow equal to theirs, crying 'Alas, how painful!' Public grief is performed even by the omniscient; matched sorrow honors the bereaved.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you suppress matched grief because you don't share the loss?
  • How could performed sorrow be honest service to mourners?

Kṛṣṇa cries with Bhīṣma and Gāndhārī the way an actor weeps real tears for a script He helped to write. The sorrow is not pretense and not ignorance; it is the Person stooping into the form of a grieving kinsman so that the kinsmen can be consoled.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.3

↗
लब्ध्वैतदन्तरं राजन् शतधन्वानमूचतु: । अक्रूरकृतवर्माणौ मनि: कस्मान्न गृह्यते ॥ ३ ॥
labdhvaitad antaraṁ rājan
[labdhvaitad antaram raajan]
śatadhanvānam ūcatuḥ
[shatadhanvaanam oochatuh]
akrūra-kṛtavarmāṇau
[akroora-kritavarmaanau]
maniḥ kasmān na gṛhyate
[manih kasmaan na grihyate]
labdhvā — achieving etat — this antaram — opportunity rājan — O King (Parīkṣit) śatadhanvānam — to Śatadhanvā ūcatuḥ — said akrūra - kṛtavarmāṇau — Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā maniḥ — the jewel kasmāt — why na gṛhyate — should not be taken .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
labdhvaitad antaraṁ rājan
labdhvā
achieving
etat
this
antaram
opportunity
rājan
O King (Parīkṣit)
śatadhanvānam ūcatuḥ
śatadhanvānam
to Śatadhanvā
ūcatuḥ
said
akrūra-kṛtavarmāṇau
akrūra - kṛtavarmāṇau
Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā
maniḥ
the jewel
maniḥ kasmān na gṛhyate
kasmāt
why
na gṛhyate
should not be taken .
  • antaram — opportunity, gap, opening
    Literally an interval or breach. Bhāgavata diagnostics: envy waits for the Lord's absence to act. Gauḍīyas read antara-vāda as the structural condition of all conspiracies in Kṛṣṇa-līlā — Kaṁsa, Duryodhana, Śatadhanvā all act 'in the gap.'
  • akrūra - kṛtavarmāṇau — Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā
    Dual compound. Striking pairing: Akrūra is the great bhakta of chapters 38-40, Kṛtavarmā a Yādava warrior. The verse shows even senior devotees can be drawn into anartha when envy over the jewel is unaddressed. Sober warning to sādhakas.
  • śatadhanvānam — to Śatadhanvā
    Literally 'he of a hundred bows.' Brother of Satrājit on some accounts; here the instrument of others' envy. The Bhāgavatam frames him as a tool, not the prime mover — his bows do not save him from Kṛṣṇa's disc.
  • maniḥ — the jewel (Syamantaka)
    From √maṇ. The Syamantaka has been the engine of the previous chapter's saga; Gauḍīyas read it as a token of mundane opulence that, when grasped outside of Kṛṣṇa's sanction, drags every holder into ruin — Prasena, Satrājit, now Śatadhanvā.
Taking advantage of this opportunity, O King, Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā went to Śatadhanvā and said, “Why not take the Syamantaka jewel?

Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā reasoned that since Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma were absent from Dvārakā, Satrājit could be killed and the jewel stolen. Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī mentions that these two must have flattered Śatadhanvā telling him, “You are much braver than we are; so you kill him.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Taking advantage of this opportunity, O King, Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā went to Śatadhanvā and said, "Why not take the Syamantaka jewel?
Commentary

Taking the opportunity when Krsna and Balarama were not in Dvaraka, Krtavarma and Akrura went to Satadhanva and said, "You can kill Satrajit and take the jewel. Since you are more courageous than us you should kill him."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They took advantage of Kṛṣṇa’s absence (etat). A person with bad character cannot take the jewel. Therefore you should take it.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They took advantage of Kṛṣṇa’s absence (etat). They went to Śatadhanvā because of his wicked nature or to arouse hatred for Satrājit because he gave his daughter who had been promised to him. A person with bad character cannot take the jewel. Therefore you should not take it.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā take advantage of the absence to tell Śatadhanvā: 'Why not take the Syamantaka jewel?' Bad counsel finds people while protectors are away; absence creates openings for whispered evil.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you whispered evil during someone's absence?
  • Who has whispered evil to you when your protector was away?

Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā wait for Kṛṣṇa's back to turn before whispering — the same shadow-strategy that envy uses everywhere, looking for a 'gap' (antaram) in which to push its plot. The verse names the opening; the rest of the chapter shows what crawls through it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.4

↗
योऽस्मभ्यं सम्प्रतिश्रुत्य कन्यारत्नं विगर्ह्य न: । कृष्णायादान्न सत्राजित् कस्माद् भ्रातरमन्वियात् ॥ ४ ॥
yo ’smabhyaṁ sampratiśrutya
[yo ’smabhyam sampratishrutya]
kanyā-ratnaṁ vigarhya naḥ
[kanyaa-ratnam vigarhya nah]
kṛṣṇāyādān na satrājit
[krishnaayaadaan na satraajit]
kasmād bhrātaram anviyāt
[kasmaad bhraataram anviyaat]
yaḥ — who asmabhyam — to each of us sampratiśrutya — promising kanyā — his daughter ratnam — jewellike vigarhya — contemptuously neglecting naḥ — us kṛṣṇāya — to Kṛṣṇa adāt — gave na — not satrājit — Satrājit kasmāt — why bhrātaram — his brother anviyāt — should follow (in death) .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yo ’smabhyaṁ sampratiśrutya
yaḥ
who
kanyā-ratnaṁ vigarhya naḥ
kṛṣṇāyādān na satrājit
asmabhyam
to each of us
sampratiśrutya
promising
kasmād bhrātaram anviyāt
kanyā
his daughter
ratnam
jewellike
vigarhya
contemptuously neglecting
naḥ
us
kṛṣṇāya
to Kṛṣṇa
adāt
gave
na
not
satrājit
Satrājit
kasmāt
why
bhrātaram
his brother
anviyāt
should follow (in death) .
  • sampratiśrutya — having promised
    Gerund of sam-prati-√śru. The technical word for a binding word given. The conspirators frame Satrājit's breaking of his promise as the entire moral case — Gauḍīyas note that they conveniently forget Kṛṣṇa Himself returned the jewel and accepted Satyabhāmā by Satrājit's free choice.
  • vigarhya — contemptuously rejecting
    Gerund of vi-√garh. They claim Satrājit despised them; the Bhāgavata's syntax lets the reader hear it the other way too — that they despised Satrājit for choosing Kṛṣṇa over them. Gauḍīya diagnostic: those who feel slighted by a devotee's preference for Kṛṣṇa often project the slight outward.
  • kanyā - ratnam — jewel-like daughter
    Compound: kanyā (daughter) + ratnam (jewel). Satyabhāmā is herself a ratna; the conspirators reduce her, like the gem, to a piece of property withheld. Reading women and bhaktas as possessions is the underlying anartha the chapter exposes.
  • bhrātaram anviyāt — should follow his brother (in death)
    The chilling euphemism. Anu-√i (to follow after). Gauḍīyas hear in this phrase the structure of all asuric counsel: a violent end framed as natural sequence, killing dressed up as kinship.
“Satrājit promised his jewellike daughter to us but then gave her to Kṛṣṇa instead, contemptuously neglecting us. So why should Satrājit not follow his brother’s path?”

Since Satrājit’s brother, Prasena, had been violently killed, the implication of “following his brother’s path” is obvious. What we have here is an assassination plot. It is well known that both Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā are exalted, pure devotees of the Supreme Lord, so their unusual behavior requires some explanation. The ācāryas provide it as follows: Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī states that Akrūra, although a first-class, pure devotee of the Lord, was a victim of the anger directed against him by the residents of Gokula because he took Lord Kṛṣṇa away from Vṛndāvana. The gosvāmī further states that Kṛtavarmā had associated with Kaṁsa — both of them being members of the Bhoja dynasty — and thus Kṛtavarmā was now suffering from this undesirable association. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī offers an alternative explanation: Both Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā were furious with Satrājit because he had insulted Lord Kṛṣṇa and spread false rumors about Him in Dvārakā. Under normal circumstances Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā would have been most pleased that Lord Kṛṣṇa married the beautiful Satyabhāmā. Being pure devotees, they could not actually be unhappy about this match, nor could they become jealous rivals of the Lord. Therefore they had an ulterior motive in behaving like His rivals.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"Satrājit promised his jewellike daughter to us but then gave her to Kṛṣṇa instead, contemptuously neglecting us. So why should Satrājit not follow his brother's path?"
Commentary

In this verse they speak of Satrajit’s faults. According to previous statements in the bhagavatam, many suitors requested her as their bride. Each one had requested and Satrajit had promised her to each one. Should he not follow his brother Prasena to death because of this? Old commentators say that Akrura and Krtavarma, great devotees of the Lord, became extremely angry at Satrajit because of his spreading rumors against Krsna, and therefore instigated Satadhanva to kill him.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Previously it was said that Satyabhāmā had been desired by many. That is explained in this verse. Previously they had requested her as a bride but she was not given. If she cannot be given now and we cannot accept her, we should take the jewel out of spite. The plural asmabhyam is used to indicate that she was even promised to Śatadhanvā. She was promised in marriage many times (sam) because she was the best of young women. We all desired her. But he criticized us, finding fault in us. He gave her to Kṛṣṇa. Saying Kṛṣṇa’s name directly here is to show disrespect. He was devious because he promised each one of us. Not obtaining that great jewel we have suffered greatly. Why should he not following his brother? This suggests a curse. This man’s brother has died. Being without help, Satrājit will die. If he dies, he had no heir since he had no son (kasmāt). The jewel will then be yours. Therefore you should kill him. Akrūra, a great devotee of the Lord, spoke in this way because of the anger of the people of Gokula upon him. As a member of the Bhoja dynasty Kṛtavarmā shared his fault by association. Others say that because Satrājit spread false rumors about Kṛṣṇa, two great devotees Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā became extremely angry with Satrājit. To provoke Śatadhanvā, they spoke in this way.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Previously it was said that Satyabhāmā had been desired by many. That is explained in this verse. Previously they had requested her as a bride but she was not given. If she cannot be given now and we cannot accept her, we should take the jewel out of spite. The plural asmabhyam is used to indicate that she was even promised to Śatadhanvā. She was promised in marriage many times (sam) because she was the best of young women. We all desired her. But Satrajit criticized us, finding fault in us. He gave her to Kṛṣṇa. Saying Kṛṣṇa’s name directly here is to show disrespect. He was devious because he promised each one of us. Not obtaining that great jewel, we have suffered greatly. Why should Satrajit not follow his brother? This suggests a curse. This man’s brother has died. Being without help, Satrājit will die. If he dies, he had no heir since he had no son (kasmāt). The jewel will then be yours. Therefore you should kill him. Akrūra, a great devotee of the Lord, spoke in this way because of the anger of the people of Gokula upon him. As a member of the Bhoja dynasty Kṛtavarmā shared his fault by association. Or Akrura actually made no offense to the gopīs, since he was a secondary cause of the Lord’s leaving Vraja. Kṛṣṇa went by his own will in order to benefit his devotees, the Yadus, by killing Kaṁsa. Akrūra had special bhāva for the gopīs as expressed in the following: yad arcitaṁ brahma-bhavādibhiḥ suraiḥ śriyā ca devyā munibhiḥ sa-sātvataiḥ go-cāraṇāyānucaraiś carad vane yad gopikānāṁ kuca-kuṅkumāṅkitam Those lotus feet are worshiped by Brahmā, Śiva and all the other devatās, by Lakṣmī and her associates and by devotees in this world, as well as the followers of Pañcarātra. Upon those lotus feet the Lord walks about the forest while herding the cows 8with his companions, and those feet are smeared with the kuṁkuma from the gopīs’ breasts. SB 10.38.8 samarhaṇaṁ yatra nidhāya kauśikas tathā baliś cāpa jagat-trayendratām yad vā vihāre vraja-yoṣitāṁ śramaṁ sparśena saugandhika-gandhy apānudat By offering water to that lotus hand, Purandara and Bali earned the status of Indra, and during the pastimes of the rāsa dance, the Lord relieved the gopīs’ fatigue instantly by the touch of his fragrant hand. SB 10.38.17 The following should be understood. When Satrājit spread false rumors about the Lord, the great devotees Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā became very angry. They thus provoked Śatandhanva to kill him, in order to gain his daughter, making Śatadhanvā believed the rumors though Satrājit was a friend, and even wanting Śatadhanvā dead. Akrūra had no desire to possess the jewel. That is clear later.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Dana
Satrājit promised his daughter to us but gave her to Kṛṣṇa instead, contemptuously neglecting us — so why shouldn't he follow his brother's path? Grievance dressed as logic; envy weaponizes earlier slight into murder.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does an old slight get dressed up as 'logic' justifying current harm?
  • How do you catch the slide from grievance to violence in yourself?

Old grievance dressed up as principle is one of envy's favorite costumes — Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā recast their wounded pride over Satyabhāmā as 'justice' owed to Prasena. A devotee learns to suspect any righteousness whose root is a personal slight against Kṛṣṇa's choices.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.5

↗
एवं भिन्नमतिस्ताभ्यां सत्राजितमसत्तम: । शयानमवधील्ल‍ोभात् स पाप: क्षीणजीवित: ॥ ५ ॥
evaṁ bhinna-matis tābhyāṁ
[evam bhinna-matis taabhyaam]
satrājitam asattamaḥ
[satraajitam asattamah]
śayānam avadhīl lobhāt
[shayaanam avadheel lobhaat]
sa pāpaḥ kṣīṇa jīvitaḥ
[sa paapah ksheena jeevitah]
evam — thus bhinna — affected matiḥ — whose mind tābhyām — by the two of them satrājitam — Satrājit asat - tamaḥ — the most wicked śayānam — sleeping avadhīt — killed lobhāt — out of greed saḥ — he pāpaḥ — sinful kṣīṇa — diminished jīvitaḥ — whose life span .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ bhinna-matis tābhyāṁ
evam
thus
bhinna
affected
matiḥ
whose mind
tābhyām
by the two of them
satrājitam asattamaḥ
satrājitam
Satrājit
asat - tamaḥ
the most wicked
śayānam avadhīl lobhāt
śayānam
sleeping
avadhīt
killed
lobhāt
out of greed
sa pāpaḥ kṣīṇa jīvitaḥ
saḥ
he
pāpaḥ
sinful
kṣīṇa
diminished
jīvitaḥ
whose life span .
  • bhinna - matiḥ — whose mind was split / corrupted
    Compound: bhinna (broken, divided) + mati (intelligence). Gauḍīyas read bhinna-mati as the prelude to every fall — buddhi-bheda is what asuric counsel achieves. Śatadhanvā does not need to be coerced; his intelligence is simply cracked open by suggestion.
  • asat - tamaḥ — the most wicked
    Superlative of asat (untrue, evil). The Bhāgavata does not soften him: murder of a sleeping father-in-law for a gem ranks at the bottom of the moral order. The label is part of the verse's pedagogy — name the act before narrating it.
  • lobhāt — out of greed
    Ablative of lobha. Bhagavad-gītā 16.21 names kāma, krodha, and lobha as the three gates of hell. Gauḍīyas trace the Syamantaka saga as a case study in lobha — the same gem first agitates Satrājit, then kills him.
  • kṣīṇa - jīvitaḥ — whose life span was diminished
    Compound: kṣīṇa (diminished) + jīvita (life). The verb is past — the moment he raised the blade, his lifespan was already shortened. Gauḍīyas note this telescoping of cause and effect: pāpa cuts the thread before the visible consequence arrives.
His mind thus influenced by their advice, wicked Śatadhanvā murdered Satrājit in his sleep simply out of greed. In this way the sinful Śatadhanvā shortened his own life span.

According to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, the word asattamaḥ indicates that Śatadhanvā was basically evil-minded and a firm hater of Satrājit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His mind thus influenced by their advice, wicked Śatadhanvā murdered Satrājit in his sleep simply out of greed. In this way the sinful Śatadhanvā shortened his own life span.
Commentary

With his mind confused by Akrura and Krtavarma, Satadhanva, with an evil bent by nature, and with enmity towards Satrajit (asattamah), killed him while sleeping, out of greed for the jewel.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With his mind deviated from the correct path (bhinna-matiḥ) because he was of the demonic nature (asattmaḥ) like Kaṁsa, though born in the Yadu dynasty, controlled by a strong sense of sin (papaḥ) though he covered it by association with the Yadus, and though his life became shortened, he killed Satrājit in his sleep out of greed for the jewel.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With his mind deviated from the correct path (bhinna-matiḥ) because he was of the demonic nature (asattmaḥ), because he has a cruel heart or was inclined to sin (pāpaḥ), because his lifespan was short, though born in the Yadu dynasty, he murdered Satrajit. Or because of his deviated mind, he became wicked (asattamaḥ) and sinful (pāpaḥ). Or he was naturally wicked and because of that he became sinful and was influenced by the two. Moreover his life span was short. Thus he killed Satrājit in his sleep.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
His mind thus influenced, wicked Śatadhanvā murders Satrājit in his sleep simply out of greed — shortening his own life span. Acting on bad counsel kills not only the target but the actor's future.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could acting on someone else's bad advice cost you your own future?
  • How do you screen counsel before acting?

Greed asks one short question — 'why not take it?' — and waits for the mind it has hollowed out to answer 'yes' in its sleep. Śatadhanvā is murdered first inside his own buddhi; the killing of Satrājit is only the outer echo.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.6

↗
स्‍त्रीणां विक्रोशमानानां क्रन्दन्तीनामनाथवत् । हत्वा पशून् सौनिकवन्मणिमादाय जग्मिवान् ॥ ६ ॥
strīṇāṁ vikrośamānānāṁ
[streenaam vikroshamaanaanaam]
krandantīnām anātha-vat
[krandanteenaam anaatha-vat]
hatvā paśūn saunika-van
[hatvaa pashoon saunika-van]
maṇim ādāya jagmivān
[manim aadaaya jagmivaan]
strīṇām — as the women vikrośamānānām — called out krandantīnām — and cried anātha — persons who have no protector vat — as if hatvā — having killed paśūn — animals saunika — a butcher vat — like maṇim — the jewel ādāya — taking jagmivān — he went .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
strīṇāṁ vikrośamānānāṁ
strīṇām
as the women
vikrośamānānām
called out
krandantīnām anātha-vat
krandantīnām
and cried
anātha
persons who have no protector
vat
as if
hatvā paśūn saunika-van
hatvā
having killed
paśūn
animals
saunika
a butcher
vat
like
maṇim ādāya jagmivān
maṇim
the jewel
ādāya
taking
jagmivān
he went .
  • vikrośamānānām — (of the women) screaming
    Present participle of vi-√kruś. The women's cries form the soundscape of the crime — the Bhāgavatam refuses to let the murder be silent. Gauḍīyas note: any act that leaves devotees weeping is by definition unrighteous, whatever its political justification.
  • anātha - vat — as if without a protector
    Compound: a-nātha (without lord) + vat (as if). The cry of one who has no nātha — and yet Kṛṣṇa is already in motion. Gauḍīyas read this as the structural form of all distress in Bhāgavata: those who appear nātha-less are precisely those for whom Bhagavān comes.
  • saunika - vat — like a butcher
    Compound: saunika (butcher) + vat (like). One of Bhāgavatam's stark similes for someone trafficking in violence for gain. The same word recurs in the Sixth Canto for the Yamadūtas' description of pāpa-karma.
  • jagmivān — he went (off)
    Perfect participle of √gam. The verse closes with the criminal's departure — and the chapter will close with Kṛṣṇa's pursuit. Sanskrit narrative architecture: the going-away of pāpa sets up the coming-after of Bhagavān.
As the women of Satrājit’s palace screamed and helplessly wept, Śatadhanvā took the jewel and left, like a butcher after he has killed some animals.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As the women of Satrājit's palace screamed and helplessly wept, Śatadhanvā took the jewel and left, like a butcher after he has killed some animals.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The scene is described. The possessive case of strīṇāṁ vikrośamānānāṁ krandantīnām indicates that he was indifferent to their crying and screaming.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

His wicked nature is described. The possessive case of strīṇāṁ vikrośamānānāṁ krandantīnām indicates that he was indifferent to their crying and screaming. Or it has a locative meaning, “even though they screamed.” Though they appeared to be without a master (anāthavat), they had Kṛṣṇa as their master. The example of killing animals suggests his great sin.

Concepts
Jiva
As the palace women scream and weep, Śatadhanvā takes the jewel and leaves like a butcher after killing animals. Cold criminal exit; cries of the bereaved don't register for those acting on greed.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you proceed deaf to nearby grief because you're focused on a 'jewel'?
  • How does your hearing get re-tuned when greed quiets?

The verse compares Śatadhanvā to a butcher leaving the slaughter pen — women weeping like leaderless cattle, jewel in hand. Bhāgavata's image is exact: greed always reduces persons to paśus, even when the killer wears royal clothes.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.7

↗
सत्यभामा च पितरं हतं वीक्ष्य शुचार्पिता । व्यलपत्तात तातेति हा हतास्मीति मुह्यती ॥ ७ ॥
satyabhāmā ca pitaraṁ
[satyabhaamaa cha pitaram]
hataṁ vīkṣya śucārpitā
[hatam veekshya shuchaarpitaa]
vyalapat tāta tāteti
[vyalapat taata taateti]
hā hatāsmīti muhyatī
[haa hataasmeeti muhyatee]
satyabhāmā — Queen Satyabhāmā ca — and pitaram — her father hatam — killed vīkṣya — seeing śucā - arpitā — cast into sorrow vyalapat — lamented tata tāta — O father, O father iti — thus hā — alas hatā — killed asmi — I am iti — thus muhyatī — fainting .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satyabhāmā ca pitaraṁ
satyabhāmā
Queen Satyabhāmā
ca
and
pitaram
her father
hataṁ vīkṣya śucārpitā
hatam
killed
vīkṣya
seeing
śucā - arpitā
cast into sorrow
vyalapat tāta tāteti
vyalapat
lamented
tata tāta
O father, O father
hā hatāsmīti muhyatī
iti
thus
hā
alas
hatā
killed
asmi
I am
iti
thus
muhyatī
fainting .
  • satyabhāmā — Queen Satyabhāmā
    One of Kṛṣṇa's aṣṭa-mahiṣīs in Dvārakā. Gauḍīyas read her as an expansion of Bhū-devī and a partial reflection of Rādhā's pride-bhāva — she is Kṛṣṇa's fiery wife, and her grief here is the door through which Kṛṣṇa enters this whole episode.
  • śucā - arpitā — cast into sorrow
    Compound: śuc (grief) + arpita (placed into). Sorrow is described as a place she has been placed — the Bhāgavata's grammar of bhāva: emotion as a region the devotee enters, not a state that arises from inside her.
  • tata tāta — father, O father
    The vocative doubled — the sound of a child collapsing into the relationship word itself. Gauḍīyas treat this doubling as a feature of bhāva-language across the Bhāgavatam: Yaśodā cries 'lāla, lāla'; Devakī, 'putra, putra'; Satyabhāmā, 'tāta, tāta'.
  • muhyatī — fainting
    Present participle of √muh. The same root from which moha (delusion) is built — but here it is a daughter's grief-faint, not asuric delusion. Bhāgavata distinguishes: moha that closes one to Kṛṣṇa is anartha; the moha of love that drives one toward Kṛṣṇa is bhāva.
When Satyabhāmā saw her dead father, she was plunged into grief. Lamenting “My father, my father! Oh, I am killed!” she fell unconscious.

According to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, Satyabhāmā’s anguished feelings and words at the death of her father were prompted by Lord Kṛṣṇa’s pastime potency ( līlā-śakti ), to prepare for the Lord’s violent reaction against Śatadhanvā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Satyabhāmā saw her dead father, she was plunged into grief. Lamenting "My father, my father! Oh, I am killed!" she fell unconscious.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Hearing about the death, Satyabhāmā went there and saw his dead body. She was inundated (arpitāḥ) with grief or offered herself to grief. Or she was thrown (arpitāḥ) by fate into lamentation. She did not consider the faults of her father out of affection (muhyatī). Or she finally fainted. The reason is the līlā-śakti which creates variety of rasas in the pastimes.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Satyabhāmā sees her dead father, lamenting 'My father, my father! I am killed!' she falls unconscious. The body collapses at the sight of a loved one's murder; some news cannot be absorbed standing up.
Reflection Questions
  • What news has caused your body to collapse, and have you honored the collapse?
  • How do you make room for grief that fells the body?

Satyabhāmā cries 'tāta, tāta!' over her father's body the way a daughter throughout time has cried — and Bhagavān is the husband to whom that cry must be brought. Gauḍīyas read her fainting not as weakness but as the rasa of grief that becomes the seed of consolation only when carried to Kṛṣṇa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.8

↗
तैलद्रोण्यां मृतं प्रास्य जगाम गजसाह्वयम् । कृष्णाय विदितार्थाय तप्ताचख्यौ पितुर्वधम् ॥ ८ ॥
taila-droṇyāṁ mṛtaṁ prāsya
[taila-dronyaam mritam praasya]
jagāma gajasāhvayam
[jagaama gajasaahvayam]
kṛṣṇāya viditārthāya
[krishnaaya viditaarthaaya]
taptācakhyau pitur vadham
[taptaachakhyau pitur vadham]
taila — of oil droṇyām — in a large vessel mṛtam — the corpse prāsya — putting jagāma — she went gaja - sāhvayam — to Hastināpura, the Kuru capital kṛṣṇāya — to Kṛṣṇa vidita - arthāya — who already was aware of the situation taptā — sorrowful ācakhyau — she related pituḥ — of her father vadham — the killing .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taila-droṇyāṁ mṛtaṁ prāsya
taila
of oil
droṇyām
in a large vessel
mṛtam
the corpse
prāsya
putting
jagāma gajasāhvayam
jagāma
she went
gaja - sāhvayam
to Hastināpura, the Kuru capital
kṛṣṇāya viditārthāya
kṛṣṇāya
to Kṛṣṇa
vidita - arthāya
who already was aware of the situation
taptācakhyau pitur vadham
taptā
sorrowful
ācakhyau
she related
pituḥ
of her father
vadham
the killing .
  • taila - droṇyām — in a vat of oil
    Compound: taila (oil) + droṇī (large tub). The detail is unforgettable — Satyabhāmā preserves the body so Kṛṣṇa can later perform the rites Himself (verse 28). Gauḍīyas note: devotees do not let go of the dead until the Lord has been informed.
  • gaja - sāhvayam — to Hastināpura (named after the elephant)
    Compound: gaja (elephant) + āhvaya (name). Hastina-pura, 'elephant city,' the Kuru capital where Kṛṣṇa was performing kinship rites. Satyabhāmā crosses kingdoms with her father's corpse riding behind her — bhakti's geography in motion.
  • vidita - arthāya — to (Kṛṣṇa) who was already aware
    Compound: vidita (known) + artha (matter). The verse repeats verse 1's frame: Kṛṣṇa already knows. Yet she tells Him, because telling Bhagavān what He already knows is itself one of the limbs of bhakti — āvedana, surrendering one's affairs by speaking them.
  • taptā — scorched (with grief)
    Past participle of √tap (to heat, burn). The same root as tapas — austerity. Gauḍīyas hear a deep tone: she is undergoing an involuntary tapas of grief that Kṛṣṇa will redirect. Bhakti often begins in heat the devotee did not choose.
Queen Satyabhāmā put her father’s corpse in a large vat of oil and went to Hastināpura, where she sorrowfully told Lord Kṛṣṇa, who was already aware of the situation, about her father’s murder.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Queen Satyabhāmā put her father's corpse in a large vat of oil and went to Hastināpura, where she sorrowfully told Lord Kṛṣṇa, who was already aware of the situation, about her father's murder.
Commentary

People said that since her husband was the supreme Lord, she could have him bring her father back to life. For that reason she went to Hastinapura, and not out of affection for her father, because her father had animosity towards Krsna. Thus her grieving (tapta) was in order to encourage Krsna to appear to show grief as well.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Because the necessary rites like śrāddhas, after burning the body, could not be done, she put his body in oil. Or she did this because she wanted the Lord bring him to life, or she wanted to show the body to the Lord in order that he grieve and become angry. But the Lord already knew the inevitable future results because the jewel had been possessed by the wrong people such as Prasena.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Svadhyaya (Self-study & Scripture Study)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Satyabhāmā puts her father's corpse in a vat of oil, goes to Hastināpura, and tells Kṛṣṇa, already aware, about the murder. Preservation of the body, journey to the Lord, narration of the loss — grief organizes itself into action.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could you preserve, travel, and narrate as a grief sequence?
  • What loss in your life is waiting to be carried to the Lord in person?

Satyabhāmā preserves her father in oil so the funeral can wait for Kṛṣṇa — even her grief organizes itself around His timing. A devotee in shock still arranges the world so that Bhagavān can act on it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.9

↗
तदाकर्ण्येश्वरौ राजन्ननुसृत्य नृलोकताम् । अहो न: परमं कष्टमित्यस्राक्षौ विलेपतु: ॥ ९ ॥
tad ākarṇyeśvarau rājann
[tad aakarnyeshvarau raajann]
anusṛtya nṛ-lokatām
[anusritya nri-lokataam]
aho naḥ paramaṁ kaṣṭam
[aho nah paramam kashtam]
ity asrākṣau vilepatuḥ
[ity asraakshau vilepatuh]
tat — that ākarṇya — hearing īśvarau — the two Lords rājan — O King (Parīkṣit) anusṛtya — imitating nṛ - lokatām — the way of human society aho — alas naḥ — for Us paramam — the greatest kaṣṭam — distress iti — thus asra — tearful akṣau — whose eyes vilepatuḥ — They both lamented .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad ākarṇyeśvarau rājann
tat
that
ākarṇya
hearing
īśvarau
the two Lords
rājan
O King (Parīkṣit)
anusṛtya
imitating
anusṛtya nṛ-lokatām
nṛ - lokatām
the way of human society
aho naḥ paramaṁ kaṣṭam
aho
alas
naḥ
for Us
paramam
the greatest
kaṣṭam
distress
ity asrākṣau vilepatuḥ
iti
thus
asra
tearful
akṣau
whose eyes
vilepatuḥ
They both lamented .
  • īśvarau — the two Lords
    Dual of īśvara — supreme controller. The Bhāgavata insists on Their lordship in the very verse where Their tears flow. Gauḍīyas read this as proof-text for bhagavān's intentional descent into emotion — He weeps as īśvara, not in spite of being īśvara.
  • anusṛtya nṛ - lokatām — imitating the way of human society
    Compound phrase: anu-√sṛ (to follow after) + nṛ-loka (human world) + -tā (-ness). The Bhāgavata's signature disclaimer — Bhagavān imitates human conduct. Gauḍīyas treat this as the doctrinal anchor against any reading of Kṛṣṇa-līlā that mistakes the human form for human limitation.
  • paramam kaṣṭam — the greatest distress
    Superlative grief-cry — proportionate to the rasa He is honoring (Satyabhāmā's love for her father). Gauḍīyas observe: Bhagavān's lament matches the bhāva of the devotee whose pain He is sharing, not the cosmic weight of the event.
  • vilepatuḥ — they both lamented
    Dual perfect of vi-√lap. The pluralized weeping is striking — Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma weeping together, anchoring Their dvi-mūrti unity even in shared grief. Gauḍīyas note: even Their tears are dual.
When Lord Kṛṣṇa and Lord Balarāma heard this news, O King, They exclaimed, “Alas! This is the greatest tragedy for Us!” Thus imitating the ways of human society, They lamented, Their eyes brimming with tears.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Lord Kṛṣṇa and Lord Balarāma heard this news, O King, They exclaimed, "Alas! This is the greatest tragedy for Us! "Thus imitating the ways of human society, They lamented, Their eyes brimming with tears.
Commentary

Hearing her words without crying, they both then made a show of lamentation to satisfy the public.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though the two Lords were above the material world, they followed the customs of mankind (nṛ-lokatām) by weeping because of separation from relatives because of the pastimes. Doing otherwise would have looked extremely unsuitable. Their lamentation is described. Aho indicates lamentation. We, including Vasudeva and others, have the greatest misfortune since our good friend was killed while sleeping so that someone could gain wealth by theft. Moreover this is a cause of shame in society. O king! You know such sweet human pastimes of Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though the two Lords were above the material world, they followed the customs of mankind (nṛ-lokatām) by weeping because of separation from relatives, because of the pastimes. Doing otherwise would have looked extremely unsuitable. Or since they were directly the Lords, though in all cases they are without lamentation, to show their unlimited qualities they appeared in the human world. They showed affection and lamented. Their lamentation is described. Aho indicates lamentation. We, including Vasudeva and others, have the greatest misfortune since our good friend was killed while sleeping, so that someone could gain wealth by theft. Moreover this is a cause of shame in society. O king! You should not be surprised that such lamentation and pain for friends arises. Or you know that all this was for pleasing Satyabhāmā.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Hearing this, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma exclaim 'Alas! This is the greatest tragedy for Us!' — imitating human society, They lament with tears. The Lord allows Himself to lament with the bereaved; divinity doesn't bypass mourning.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you bypass mourning thinking spirituality requires composure?
  • How does the Lord's tears free you to weep?

Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma weep on hearing of Satrājit's death — yet They knew before Satyabhāmā arrived. Their tears are the Lord's lokavat-anukaraṇam, the way an elder brother lets his eyes wet for a child's broken toy so the child can feel met before being consoled.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.10

↗
आगत्य भगवांस्तस्मात् सभार्य: साग्रज: पुरम् । शतधन्वानमारेभे हन्तुं हर्तुं मणिं तत: ॥ १० ॥
āgatya bhagavāṁs tasmāt
[aagatya bhagavaams tasmaat]
sa-bhāryaḥ sāgrajaḥ puram
[sa-bhaaryah saagrajah puram]
śatadhanvānam ārebhe
[shatadhanvaanam aarebhe]
hantuṁ hartuṁ maṇiṁ tataḥ
[hantum hartum manim tatah]
āgatya — returning bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead tasmāt — from that place sa - bhāryaḥ — with His wife sa - agrajaḥ — and with His elder brother puram — to His capital śatadhanvānam — Śatadhanvā ārebhe — He prepared hantum — to kill hartum — to take maṇim — the jewel tataḥ — from him .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āgatya bhagavāṁs tasmāt
āgatya
returning
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
tasmāt
from that place
sa-bhāryaḥ sāgrajaḥ puram
sa - bhāryaḥ
with His wife
sa - agrajaḥ
and with His elder brother
puram
to His capital
śatadhanvānam ārebhe
śatadhanvānam
Śatadhanvā
ārebhe
He prepared
hantuṁ hartuṁ maṇiṁ tataḥ
hantum
to kill
hartum
to take
maṇim
the jewel
tataḥ
from him .
  • sa - bhāryaḥ sa - agrajaḥ — with His wife and with His elder brother
    Two parallel saha-compounds. The verse carefully places Satyabhāmā and Balarāma on either side of Kṛṣṇa as He returns — Gauḍīya iconography: dharma-patnī on one side, agraja on the other, Bhagavān moving as the center of a relational world.
  • puram — to the (His) city
    Dvārakā, the dvāra-vatī, the city of gates. Gauḍīyas read Dvārakā as the seat of Kṛṣṇa's aiśvarya-līlā — where the Vraja-boy now governs as king. The 'puram' here is therefore not just a location but a register-shift from Hastināpura's diplomacy to Dvārakā's authority.
  • ārebhe — He prepared
    Imperfect of ā-√rabh. The verb of beginning, of taking up. The Lord 'begins' to act — but for one who is already aware (vijñāta), beginning is theatrical. Gauḍīyas mark these verbs as signs of Bhagavān entering His own narrative.
  • hantum hartum — to kill and to take
    Two infinitives of √han (to kill) and √hṛ (to take). The verse compresses the whole arc of the chapter — kill the murderer, recover the gem. Gauḍīyas note the symmetry: Bhagavān's two infinitives mirror the conspirators' two questions in verses 3-4.
The Supreme Lord returned to His capital with His wife and elder brother. After arriving in Dvārakā, He readied Himself to kill Śatadhanvā and retrieve the jewel from him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Lord returned to His capital with His wife and elder brother. After arriving in Dvārakā, He readied Himself to kill Śatadhanvā and retrieve the jewel from him.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛtavarmā and Akrūra had of course helped Śatadhanvā. Kṛṣṇa knew through spies where the jewel was, but later it is said that he searched Śatadhanvā’s clothing. This was because of absorption in human pastimes, controlled by his dear devotees. He thus gathered his friends in order that they help him (ārebhe). Then Śatadhanvā fled and Kṛṣṇa decided to kill him alone. That is explained later.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa, the supreme Lord who appeared in the world to kill demons (bhagavān), went from Hastinapura (tasmāt) to Dvārakā. He thus gathered his friends in order that they help him (ārebhe) ,since Kṛtavarmā was assisting Śatadhanvā. He actually announced his efforts to pursue Śatadhanvā to kill him in a solitary place, and favor Akrūra. Thus he is called bhagavān, he who is affectionate to his devotee. Though he did this with Balarāma, only Kṛṣṇa is mentioned since he was the main person making arrangements to kill Śatadhanvā. He also feared Balarāma.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Returning to His capital with His wife and elder brother, Kṛṣṇa prepares to kill Śatadhanvā and retrieve the jewel. Grief is followed by action; justice belongs in mourning.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you separate grief and action when they belong together?
  • What specific justice would honor a current loss?

Bhagavān returns to His city the way a king returns to the chessboard mid-game — wife, brother, and resolve all carried in one breath. Justice in His hand is not vengeance; it is the next move played without delay.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.11

↗
सोऽपि कृतोद्यमं ज्ञात्वा भीत: प्राणपरीप्सया । साहाय्ये कृतवर्माणमयाचत स चाब्रवीत् ॥ ११ ॥
so ’pi kṛtodyamaṁ jñātvā
[so ’pi kritodyamam jnaatvaa]
bhītaḥ prāṇa-parīpsayā
[bheetah praana-pareepsayaa]
sāhāyye kṛtavarmāṇam
[saahaayye kritavarmaanam]
ayācata sa cābravīt
[ayaachata sa chaabraveet]
saḥ — he (Śatadhanvā) api — also kṛta - udyamam — preparing Himself jñātvā — learning bhītaḥ — frightened prāṇa — his life air parīpsayā — wishing to save sāhāyye — for assistance kṛtavarmāṇam — Kṛtavarmā ayācata — he entreated saḥ — he ca — and abravīt — said .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’pi kṛtodyamaṁ jñātvā
bhītaḥ prāṇa-parīpsayā
saḥ
he (Śatadhanvā)
api
also
sāhāyye kṛtavarmāṇam
kṛta - udyamam
preparing Himself
jñātvā
learning
bhītaḥ
frightened
prāṇa
his life air
parīpsayā
wishing to save
ayācata sa cābravīt
sāhāyye
for assistance
kṛtavarmāṇam
Kṛtavarmā
ayācata
he entreated
saḥ
he
ca
and
abravīt
said .
  • bhītaḥ — frightened
    Past participle of √bhī. The Bhāgavata frames Śatadhanvā by a single word: he is afraid. Gauḍīyas read this against Bhagavad-gītā 5.29's promise — peace comes to one who knows Kṛṣṇa as suhṛd. The opposite knower (one who has wronged Kṛṣṇa's relations) is frozen by fear.
  • prāṇa - parīpsayā — out of the desire to save his life
    Compound: prāṇa (life) + parī-√āp (to seek to obtain) + -ā (instr. fem.). The whole verse pivots on this phrase — Śatadhanvā suddenly cares about prāṇa, having moments ago cared about a gem. Gauḍīyas note: lobha forgets death until death approaches.
  • sāhāyye — for assistance
    Locative of sāhāyya (helpfulness). The technical word for an alliance against an enemy. He asks the co-conspirator for sāhāyya against Kṛṣṇa — the impossibility of which sets up the next three verses' confessions.
  • kṛtavarmāṇam — Kṛtavarmā
    Accusative of Kṛtavarmā, the Yādava chief who fought on the Kaurava side at Kurukṣetra. Gauḍīyas trace his trajectory: complicit here, later partisan against the Pāṇḍavas, eventually destroyed in the Yādava infighting. The chapter shows the first slip.
Upon learning that Lord Kṛṣṇa was preparing to kill him, Śatadhanvā was struck with fear. To save his life he approached Kṛtavarmā and begged him for help, but Kṛtavarmā replied as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Upon learning that Lord Kṛṣṇa was preparing to kill him, Śatadhanvā was struck with fear. To save his life he approached Kṛtavarmā and begged him for help, but Kṛtavarmā replied as follows.
Commentary

Satabhama also returned, and explained that Krsna and Balarama could not bring her father back to life, and had thus lamented.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He desired to save his life only, not his reputation or dharma. He desired to save his life completely (pari), with no injury. He had a desire for life which was almost gone. He went to Kṛtavarmā first since he was a commander. He doubted Akrūra would help since he was a great devotee.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Udyama (Industriousness / Effort)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Satya (Truthfulness)Santosha (Contentment)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)
Related verses
Concepts
DharmaJiva
Learning the Lord is preparing to kill him, Śatadhanvā is struck with fear and approaches Kṛtavarmā for help. The criminal seeks the inciter's protection; both will fail him.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you seek protection from those who encouraged the very act now threatening you?
  • How do you discern reliable protectors from interested instigators?

The murderer who has the jewel discovers the gem cannot protect him — a stolen opulence is heavy in the hand and useless against Kṛṣṇa's pursuit. Śatadhanvā begs Kṛtavarmā for shelter, the way every soul living off plunder eventually asks someone weaker than Bhagavān for help.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.12-13

↗
नाहमीस्वरयो: कुर्यां हेलनं रामकृष्णयो: । को नु क्षेमाय कल्पेत तयोर्वृजिनमाचरन् ॥ १२ ॥ कंस: सहानुगोऽपीतो यद्‍द्वेषात्त्याजित: श्रिया । जरासन्ध: सप्तदश संयुगाद् विरथो गत: ॥ १३ ॥
nāham īsvarayoḥ kuryāṁ
[naaham eesvarayoh kuryaam]
helanaṁ rāma-kṛṣṇayoḥ
[helanam raama-krishnayoh]
ko nu kṣemāya kalpeta
[ko nu kshemaaya kalpeta]
tayor vṛjinam ācaran
[tayor vrijinam aacharan]
kaṁsaḥ sahānugo ’pīto
[kamsah sahaanugo ’peeto]
yad-dveṣāt tyājitaḥ śriyā
[yad-dveshaat tyaajitah shriyaa]
jarāsandhaḥ saptadaśa-
[jaraasandhah saptadasha-]
saṁyugād viratho gataḥ
[samyugaad viratho gatah]
na — not aham — I īśvarayoḥ — toward the Lords kuryām — can commit helanam — offense rāma - kṛṣṇayoḥ — toward Balarāma and Kṛṣṇa kaḥ — who nu — indeed kṣemāya — good fortune kalpeta — can achieve tayoḥ — to Them vṛjinam — trouble ācaran — causing kaṁsaḥ — King Kaṁsa saha — along with anugaḥ — his followers apītaḥ — dead yat — against whom dveṣāt — because of his hatred tyājitaḥ — abandoned śriyā — by his opulence jarāsandhaḥ — Jarāsandha saptadaśa — seventeen saṁyugāt — resulting from battles virathaḥ — deprived of his chariot gataḥ — became .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nāham īsvarayoḥ kuryāṁ
na
not
aham
I
īśvarayoḥ
toward the Lords
kuryām
can commit
helanaṁ rāma-kṛṣṇayoḥ
helanam
offense
rāma - kṛṣṇayoḥ
toward Balarāma and Kṛṣṇa
ko nu kṣemāya kalpeta
kaḥ
who
tayor vṛjinam ācaran
kaṁsaḥ sahānugo ’pīto
nu
indeed
kṣemāya
good fortune
kalpeta
can achieve
yad-dveṣāt tyājitaḥ śriyā
tayoḥ
to Them
vṛjinam
trouble
ācaran
causing
kaṁsaḥ
King Kaṁsa
jarāsandhaḥ saptadaśa-
saha
along with
anugaḥ
his followers
apītaḥ
dead
yat
against whom
saṁyugād viratho gataḥ
dveṣāt
because of his hatred
tyājitaḥ
abandoned
śriyā
by his opulence
jarāsandhaḥ
Jarāsandha
saptadaśa
seventeen
saṁyugāt
resulting from battles
virathaḥ
deprived of his chariot
gataḥ
became .
  • īśvarayoḥ — toward the two Lords
    Genitive dual of īśvara. Kṛtavarmā recognizes Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma as īśvarayoḥ — full controllers — and yet does not surrender. Gauḍīyas mark the gap: knowing Bhagavān's identity is not yet ātma-nikṣepa.
  • helanam — offense, contempt
    From √hel. Technical term for slight or insult — what Vaiṣṇava-aparādha is built from. The verse plants the word that Caitanya tradition will later expand into the doctrine of nāmāparādha and seva-aparādha.
  • tyājitaḥ śriyā — abandoned by opulence
    Past participle of tyaj (caused to be left) + instrumental of śrī (Lakṣmī, opulence). The Bhāgavata's verdict on Kaṁsa: Lakṣmī Herself walks out on those who oppose Her Lord. Gauḍīyas read this as proof that śrī follows Kṛṣṇa, never independent fortune.
  • saptadaśa - saṁyugāt — from seventeen battles
    Compound: saptadaśa (seventeen) + saṁyuga (battle, encounter). The specific count anchors the cosmic point in history — Bhāgavata measures Bhagavān's victories arithmetically when needed.
  • virathaḥ — without a chariot
    Compound: vi- (away from) + ratha (chariot). The terminal image of Jarāsandha's career — the great king reduced to standing in the dust. Gauḍīyas read this as the moral of any sustained Kṛṣṇa-vairitva: the chariot is the first thing to go.
[Kṛtavarmā said:] I dare not offend the Supreme Lords, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma. Indeed, how can one who troubles Them expect any good fortune? Kaṁsa and all his followers lost both their wealth and their lives because of enmity toward Them, and after battling Them seventeen times Jarāsandha was left without even a chariot.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī explains that the word helanam indicates acting against the Lords’ will, and that vṛjinam indicates an offense against the Lords.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[Kṛtavarmā said:] I dare not offend the Supreme Lords, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma. Indeed, how can one who troubles Them expect any good fortune? Kaṁsa and all his followers lost both their wealth and their lives because of enmity toward Them, and after battling Them seventeen times Jarāsandha was left without even a chariot.
Commentary

"In instigating you to kill Satrajit, I had no intentions of hostility towards the Lord. If you do not want to surrender to the Lord, should I also, like you, act against the Lord?" "Kamsa and his followers, died (apitah), and thus lost their wealth." Or the sentence cane mean, "Already dead, because of their enmity towards the Lord, they were also rejected by Laksmi. In seventeen battles, Jarasandha was defeated."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Let others offend them but I cannot. Because of their enmity wealth abandoned them. Wealth was there but not with them.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Let others offend them but I cannot. Why? They are full of all powers (īśvarayoḥ). Balarāma enjoys battle (rāma). Kṛṣṇa takes away the life of enemies (kṛṣṇayoḥ). Who is qualified for benefit by obstructing them? Because of hatred for Kṛṣṇa or both of them, Kaṁsa was rejected by wealth of dharma (śriyā). Or he was deprived of wealth by Kṛṣṇa. Because of hatred of Kṛṣṇa, Jarāsandha was left without a chariot.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Satya (Truthfulness)Udyama (Industriousness / Effort)
Related verses
Kṛtavarmā: I dare not offend the Supreme Lords — one who troubles Them cannot expect good fortune; Kaṁsa and followers lost wealth and lives. The original inciter now refuses to help; cowardice follows manipulation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could you refuse to bail out someone you encouraged into folly without first naming your role?
  • How does honest acknowledgment precede genuine refusal?

Kṛtavarmā recites the obituary of every previous opponent of Kṛṣṇa — Kaṁsa, his ministers, Jarāsandha — like a man pulling up a long ledger of corpses before declining to add his own name. Even an erring devotee can refuse the next step when he remembers Bhagavān's track record.

Jarāsandha's seventeen failed campaigns

After Kṛṣṇa killed Kaṁsa, Jarāsandha — Kaṁsa's father-in-law and king of Magadha — attacked Mathurā seventeen times in sequence and was repulsed each time. The Bhāgavatam (10.50) records his armies being routed and his chariot finally broken. Gauḍīyas use the count of seventeen as shorthand for the futility of sustained opposition to Bhagavān.

Kṛtavarmā cites this history not as theology but as policy — and yet the citation is doctrinally correct. Sometimes a wavering devotee is saved by remembering the wreckage of Kṛṣṇa's enemies before remembering His sweetness.

Kaṁsa's followers in chapter 44

When Kṛṣṇa killed Kaṁsa in the wrestling arena (SB 10.44), He simultaneously broke the entire administrative apparatus — Kaṁsa's eight brothers fell to Balarāma in the same hour. The Bhāgavatam's pattern: an offense against Kṛṣṇa propagates through every collaborator.

Kṛtavarmā has read this lesson; tragically, he reads it well enough to refuse Śatadhanvā but not well enough to repent of his own role in the conspiracy. Gauḍīyas read this as a warning to half-bhaktas: the right citation is not yet surrender.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.14

↗
प्रत्याख्यात: स चाक्रूरं पार्ष्णिग्राहमयाचत । सोऽप्याह को विरुध्येत विद्वानीश्वरयोर्बलम् ॥ १४ ॥
pratyākhyātaḥ sa cākrūraṁ
[pratyaakhyaatah sa chaakrooram]
pārṣṇi-grāham ayācata
[paarshni-graaham ayaachata]
so ’py āha ko virudhyeta
[so ’py aaha ko virudhyeta]
vidvān īśvarayor balam
[vidvaan eeshvarayor balam]
pratyākhyātaḥ — refused saḥ — he, Śatadhanvā ca — and akrūram — Akrūra pārṣṇi - grāham — for help ayācata — begged saḥ — he, Akrūra api — also āha — said kaḥ — who virudhyeta — can stand against vidvān — knowing īśvarayoḥ — of the two Personalities of Godhead balam — the strength .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pratyākhyātaḥ sa cākrūraṁ
pratyākhyātaḥ
refused
saḥ
he, Śatadhanvā
ca
and
akrūram
Akrūra
pārṣṇi-grāham ayācata
pārṣṇi - grāham
for help
ayācata
begged
saḥ
he, Akrūra
api
also
so ’py āha ko virudhyeta
āha
said
kaḥ
who
virudhyeta
can stand against
vidvān īśvarayor balam
vidvān
knowing
īśvarayoḥ
of the two Personalities of Godhead
balam
the strength .
  • pratyākhyātaḥ — refused, rejected
    Past participle of prati-ā-√khyā. The same word will repeat at verse 18 — the verse-pair forms a rejection-mirror. Bhāgavata's structural device: pāpa is closed off by repeated noes from those who could have helped.
  • pārṣṇi - grāham — (asking for) rear-guard support
    Compound: pārṣṇi (heel, rear) + grāha (grasp). The military term for one who attacks from behind / covers the rear. Śatadhanvā wants someone to take the blow that will land on his back — Akrūra declines.
  • vidvān — (one who is) knowing
    Present participle of √vid. Akrūra positions his refusal as an epistemic matter: anyone who knows the strength of the two Lords cannot oppose Them. Gauḍīyas read jñāna here as functional knowledge that produces surrender, not abstract theory.
  • balam — the strength
    From √bal. Bhagavān's bala is a recurring theme in the Bhāgavata's treatment of avatāra: it is not merely physical power but the inherent capacity of the īśvara. Gauḍīyas read 'balam īśvarayoḥ' as an oblique pointer to Balarāma's name itself — bala personified.
His appeal refused, Śatadhanvā went to Akrūra and begged him for protection. But Akrūra similarly told him, “Who would oppose the two Personalities of Godhead if he knew Their strength?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His appeal refused, Śatadhanvā went to Akrūra and begged him for protection. But Akrūra similarly told him, "Who would oppose the two Personalities of Godhead if he knew Their strength?
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Pārṣṇi-grāham means help.

Concepts
Jiva
Refused, Śatadhanvā goes to Akrūra and begs protection; Akrūra similarly: who would oppose the two Personalities of Godhead knowing Their strength? The chain of refusals teaches the criminal what he should have known.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does refusal teach what the offender should have known in advance?
  • How do you receive refusal as teaching rather than as betrayal?

Two doors closed in sequence — first Kṛtavarmā's, then Akrūra's — and Śatadhanvā is left holding the gem outside both. Gauḍīyas read these refusals as a quiet mercy: the doors that close on pāpa are themselves Bhagavān's hand.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.15

↗
य इदं लीलया विश्वं सृजत्यवति हन्ति च । चेष्टां विश्वसृजो यस्य न विदुर्मोहिताजया ॥ १५ ॥
ya idaṁ līlayā viśvaṁ
[ya idam leelayaa vishvam]
sṛjaty avati hanti ca
[srijaty avati hanti cha]
ceṣṭāṁ viśva-sṛjo yasya
[cheshtaam vishva-srijo yasya]
na vidur mohitājayā
[na vidur mohitaajayaa]
yaḥ — who idam — this līlayā — as play viśvam — universe sṛjati — creates avati — maintains hanti — destroys ca — and ceṣṭām — purpose viśva - sṛjaḥ — the (secondary) creators of the universe (headed by Lord Brahmā) yasya — whose na viduḥ — do not know mohitāḥ — bewildered ajayā — by His eternal deluding potency .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ya idaṁ līlayā viśvaṁ
yaḥ
who
idam
this
līlayā
as play
viśvam
universe
sṛjaty avati hanti ca
sṛjati
creates
avati
maintains
hanti
destroys
ca
and
ceṣṭāṁ viśva-sṛjo yasya
ceṣṭām
purpose
viśva - sṛjaḥ
the (secondary) creators of the universe (headed by Lord Brahmā)
yasya
whose
na vidur mohitājayā
na viduḥ
do not know
mohitāḥ
bewildered
ajayā
by His eternal deluding potency .
  • līlayā — as play
    Instrumental of līlā. The Gauḍīya master-key for understanding all Bhagavān's actions: creation, maintenance, destruction are not labor for Him but play. Akrūra's invocation of līlā is technically perfect — he is citing the right framework even in panic.
  • viśva - sṛjaḥ — the universal creators
    Compound: viśva (universe) + sṛj (creator). The plural — secondary creators headed by Brahmā. Gauḍīyas note: even Brahmā does not fathom Kṛṣṇa's purpose (SB 10.14 — Brahmā's prayers). Akrūra is citing Bhāgavata against itself.
  • ajayā — by His eternal māyā
    Instrumental of ajā — 'the unborn (one),' a name of māyā as Bhagavān's deluding potency. Gauḍīyas read ajā not as illusion in the Advaitin sense but as Kṛṣṇa's actual śakti that conceals Him from those who would not surrender.
  • mohitāḥ — bewildered
    Past participle of √muh. The standard Bhāgavata diagnosis for ignorance of Bhagavān: not lack of intelligence but moha that conceals. Akrūra's point: even cosmic creators are mohitāḥ — what hope has Śatadhanvā of outwitting Kṛṣṇa?
“It is the Supreme Lord who creates, maintains and destroys this universe simply as His pastime. The cosmic creators cannot even understand His purpose, bewildered as they are by His illusory Māyā.

The use of the singular yaḥ, “He who,” indicates that the frequent references to “the two Lords, Kṛṣṇa and Rāma,” do not compromise the firm principle of monotheism expressed in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. As explained in many Vedic literatures, the one Supreme Lord expands Himself into innumerable forms, yet He remains the one and almighty God. For example, we have this statement in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.33) : advaitam acyutam anādir ananta-rūpam. “The one Supreme Lord is infallible and beginningless, and He expands Himself into innumerable manifest forms.” Out of regard for the spirit of the Lord’s pastimes, in which He expands Himself and appears as His own older brother, Balarāma, the Bhāgavatam here refers to “the two Lords.” But the “bottom line” is that there is one Supreme Godhead, one Absolute Truth, who appears in His original form as Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"It is the Supreme Lord who creates, maintains and destroys this universe simply as His pastime. The cosmic creators cannot even understand His purpose, bewildered as they are by His illusory Māyā.
Commentary

He speaks in the singular to indicate that Krsna and Balarama are one principle. The irregular sandhi of mohita ajaya to mohitajaya is poetic license.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The singular is used instead of the dual since Balarāma is included in Kṛṣṇa. Akrūra speaks three verses. The Lord creates without effort (līlayā) this astonishing universe of unlimited variety. What is the purpose? No one can know his (yasya) activities, desires and intention (ceṣṭām) being bewildered by his (yasya) māyā.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The singular is used instead of the dual since Balarāma is included in Kṛṣṇa. Akrūra speaks three verses. The Lord creates without effort (līlayā) this astonishing universe of unlimited variety. What is the purpose? No one can know his (yasya) activities (ceṣṭām) being bewildered by his (yasya) māyā. Even Brahmā and others do not know, what to speak of his goal or intentions? This is because of their continuous (ajayā) illusion (mohitā). Why did you have Śatrājit killed? Why did you desire to have the jewel kept with me? No one can understand your pastimes.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Abhaya (Fearlessness)
Related verses
Concepts
MayaJivaSandhi
It is the Supreme Lord who creates, maintains, destroys the universe as His pastime; cosmic creators can't even understand His purpose. Theological size frames refusal; the no comes from cosmology, not personal animus.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could framing a refusal in theological size help receive it?
  • How does cosmological perspective convert personal no into educational no?

Akrūra in extremis becomes a theologian — under pressure he speaks the Bhāgavata-tattva he had absorbed on the chariot to Vṛndāvana. Crisis often makes a devotee preach better than he lives; the chapter is honest about the gap.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.16

↗
य: सप्तहायन: शैलमुत्पाट्यैकेन पाणिना । दधार लीलया बाल उच्छिलीन्ध्रमिवार्भक: ॥ १६ ॥
yaḥ sapta-hāyanaḥ śailam
[yah sapta-haayanah shailam]
utpāṭyaikena pāṇinā
[utpaatyaikena paaninaa]
dadhāra līlayā bāla
[dadhaara leelayaa baala]
ucchilīndhram ivārbhakaḥ
[uchchileendhram ivaarbhakah]
yaḥ — who sapta — seven hāyanaḥ — years of age śailam — a mountain utpāṭya — uprooting ekena — with a single pāṇinā — hand dadhāra — held up līlayā — as play bālaḥ — a mere child ucchilīndhram — a mushroom iva — as arbhakaḥ — a boy .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yaḥ sapta-hāyanaḥ śailam
yaḥ
who
sapta
seven
hāyanaḥ
years of age
śailam
a mountain
utpāṭyaikena pāṇinā
utpāṭya
uprooting
ekena
with a single
pāṇinā
hand
dadhāra līlayā bāla
dadhāra
held up
līlayā
as play
bālaḥ
a mere child
ucchilīndhram ivārbhakaḥ
ucchilīndhram
a mushroom
iva
as
arbhakaḥ
a boy .
  • sapta - hāyanaḥ — seven years of age
    Compound: sapta (seven) + hāyana (year). The Bhāgavata's repeated emphasis on the boyhood form: He was a seven-year-old when He lifted Govardhana. Gauḍīyas hold this in the vātsalya-frame — His power and His childhood are simultaneous, not sequential.
  • śailam — a mountain
    Govardhana, the hill of Vraja. Gauḍīyas regard Govardhana not as scenery but as a non-different aspect of Kṛṣṇa Himself (hari-dāsa-varya, per Caitanya tradition); lifting it is Bhagavān lifting His own form.
  • ekena pāṇinā — with a single hand
    Instrumental phrase: eka (one) + pāṇi (hand). The detail that turns the act into a proof. Bhāgavata's hagiography of Bhagavān often hinges on the asymmetry between magnitude and effort.
  • ucchilīndhram — a mushroom
    From ucchilīndhra (a kind of fungus / mushroom). The deliberate domestic simile — the mountain weighs nothing in His hand, as a mushroom does in a village boy's. Gauḍīyas love these similes; they keep the līlā in Vraja's vernacular.
“As a child of seven, Kṛṣṇa uprooted an entire mountain and held it aloft as easily as a young boy picks up a mushroom.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"As a child of seven, Kṛṣṇa uprooted an entire mountain and held it aloft as easily as a young boy picks up a mushroom.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

His activities are described to show his powers. At the age of seven from his birth pastimes he appeared with the form of a small child (bālaḥ). But he lifted the mountain made of rocks rather than dirt and which was thus very heavy. The rocks were in separate pieces, making them difficult to hold up. But from its very base he uprooted it and lifted it. He did this only with his left hand. And he did it without effort (līlayā), just as a child lifts a mushroom.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

What to speak of activities of creation? One cannot understand activities like lifting Govardhana, which has been directly witnessed by all at this time. Or “Let him be the Lord. But from accepting to the Yādava, is this not a contradiction between us and him (being equals)?” No, he always shows his powers. At the age of seven from his birth pastimes he appeared with the form of a small child (bālaḥ). But he lifted the mountain made of rocks rather than dirt and which was thus very heavy. The rocks were in separate pieces, making them difficult to hold up. But from its very base he uprooted the mountain and lifted it. He did this only with his left hand. And he did it without effort (līlayā), just as a child lifts a mushroom.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
As a child of seven, Kṛṣṇa uprooted an entire mountain and held it aloft as easily as a young boy picks up a mushroom. Past deeds frame present caution; the Lord's history is the warning.
Reflection Questions
  • What history of the Lord's deeds frames how you assess current options?
  • Where do you ignore past evidence when making present plans?

Akrūra reaches for the canonical proof — seven-year-old Kṛṣṇa lifting Govardhana like a mushroom. The verse is one of the Bhāgavatam's favorite citation-snapshots: when Bhagavān's strength is in question, the mountain rises in memory.

Govardhana on Kṛṣṇa's finger

When Indra unleashed seven days of catastrophic rain on Vṛndāvana to punish the village for switching its sacrifice from him to the hill, Kṛṣṇa lifted Govardhana on the little finger of His left hand and held it as a parasol for the entire population — humans, cows, and calves — for those seven days (SB 10.25).

Gauḍīyas treat this līlā as the pivotal demonstration of Bhagavān's strength yoked to His tenderness: He is strong enough to hold a mountain, gentle enough to do so to shelter Vraja's children. Akrūra cites it in this verse as the conclusive answer to anyone who imagines they can oppose Him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.17

↗
नमस्तस्मै भगवते कृष्णायाद्भ‍ुतकर्मणे । अनन्तायादिभूताय कूटस्थायात्मने नम: ॥ १७ ॥
namas tasmai bhagavate
[namas tasmai bhagavate]
kṛṣṇāyādbhuta-karmaṇe
[krishnaayaadbhuta-karmane]
anantāyādi-bhūtāya
[anantaayaadi-bhootaaya]
kūṭa-sthāyātmane namaḥ
[koota-sthaayaatmane namah]
namaḥ — obeisances tasmai — to Him bhagavate — the Supreme Lord kṛṣṇāya — Kṛṣṇa adbhuta — amazing karmaṇe — whose acts anantāya — the unlimited ādi - bhūtāya — the source of all existence kūṭa - sthāya — the immovable center of existence ātmane — the Supreme Soul namaḥ — obeisances .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
namas tasmai bhagavate
namaḥ
obeisances
tasmai
to Him
bhagavate
the Supreme Lord
kṛṣṇāyādbhuta-karmaṇe
kṛṣṇāya
Kṛṣṇa
adbhuta
amazing
karmaṇe
whose acts
anantāyādi-bhūtāya
anantāya
the unlimited
ādi - bhūtāya
the source of all existence
kūṭa-sthāyātmane namaḥ
kūṭa - sthāya
the immovable center of existence
ātmane
the Supreme Soul
namaḥ
obeisances .
  • namaḥ — obeisances
    From √nam (to bow). The opening and closing word of the verse — the praṇāma frames the speech. Gauḍīyas treat namaḥ as the technical vocabulary of surrender; the doubled namaḥ here mirrors the praṇāma-mantras of Vaiṣṇava liturgy.
  • adbhuta - karmaṇe — to Him whose acts are wonderful
    Compound: adbhuta (wonderful) + karman (act). Adbhuta is one of the eight rasas in Sanskrit aesthetics — the wonder-rasa. Gauḍīyas treat Kṛṣṇa's līlās as the unique site where adbhuta-rasa is sustained, not exhausted by exposure.
  • anantāya — to the unlimited
    Dative of ananta. Bhagavān's amplitude refusing every boundary. Gauḍīyas pair ananta with the name Ananta-deva (Śeṣa), Balarāma's tattva — so the verse subtly bows to both brothers at once.
  • kūṭa - sthāya — to the immovable
    Compound: kūṭa (peak / fixed point) + stha (standing). One of the technical names of Brahman / Paramātmā — the fixed center. Gauḍīyas read kūṭa-stha personalistically: Kṛṣṇa is the unmoving Person around whom all līlā revolves, not an impersonal absolute.
  • ātmane — to the Supreme Soul
    Dative of ātman. Gauḍīyas insist on the careful reading: ātmā here refers to Paramātmā, not to the jīva-ātmā. Kṛṣṇa as everyone's inner-witness; the jīva is His aṁśa, not His identity.
“I offer my obeisances to that Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, whose every deed is amazing. He is the Supreme Soul, the unlimited source and fixed center of all existence.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"I offer my obeisances to that Supreme Personality of Godhead, Kṛṣṇa, whose every deed is amazing. He is the Supreme Soul, the unlimited source and fixed center of all existence."
Commentary

Satadhanva left the jewel with Akrura, but he did not give it to him, as he had extreme possessiveness of the jewel. The quality of the horse was its ability to run for hundreds of yojanas in emergency. It will also be seen that because of the difficulty in going all the way from Dvaraka to Mithila, the horse died of exhaustion.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Therefore, I offer respects to the Lord who has astonishing activities. The cause of these astonishing activities is that he is Kṛṣṇa, Para-brahman with human form. Furthermore he is Bhagavān, endowed with all powers in full. Therefore he is unlimited, without end. Furthermore he is without beginning (ādi-bhūtāya). Furthermore he is without change, even in the midst of creating and destroying since he is the antaryāmī of all beings. I again offer respects to him on the ground with great devotion.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Svadhyaya (Self-study & Scripture Study)
Related verses
Concepts
Karma
Obeisances to Kṛṣṇa, whose every deed is amazing, Supreme Soul, unlimited source and fixed center of all. Even refusal of an unwise request ends in praise; declining to help becomes occasion for theology.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could even your refusals be framed in praise of the Lord?
  • How does worship root your firmness?

Akrūra in this verse becomes a worshiper rather than a tactician — namaḥ, namaḥ, double obeisance, the speech of one who has talked himself into surrender. Even a man who will be exposed three verses later can offer right praise in the right moment, and the Bhāgavata records it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.18

↗
प्रत्याख्यात: स तेनापि शतधन्वा महामणिम् । तस्मिन् न्यस्याश्वमारुह्य शतयोजनगं ययौ ॥ १८ ॥
pratyākhyātaḥ sa tenāpi
[pratyaakhyaatah sa tenaapi]
śatadhanvā mahā-maṇim
[shatadhanvaa mahaa-manim]
tasmin nyasyāśvam āruhya
[tasmin nyasyaashvam aaruhya]
śata-yojana-gaṁ yayau
[shata-yojana-gam yayau]
pratyākhyātaḥ — refused saḥ — he tena — by him, Akrūra api — also śatadhanvā — Śatadhanvā mahā - maṇim — the precious jewel tasmin — with him nyasya — leaving aśvam — a horse āruhya — mounting śata — one hundred yojana — yojanas (one yojana measures about eight miles) gam — which could go yayau — he departed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pratyākhyātaḥ sa tenāpi
pratyākhyātaḥ
refused
saḥ
he
tena
by him, Akrūra
api
also
śatadhanvā mahā-maṇim
śatadhanvā
Śatadhanvā
mahā - maṇim
the precious jewel
tasmin nyasyāśvam āruhya
tasmin
with him
nyasya
leaving
aśvam
a horse
āruhya
mounting
śata-yojana-gaṁ yayau
śata
one hundred
yojana
yojanas (one yojana measures about eight miles)
gam
which could go
yayau
he departed .
  • mahā - maṇim — the great jewel
    Compound: mahā (great) + maṇi (gem). The Syamantaka now called mahā-maṇi — its name swells as its danger swells. Gauḍīyas observe: opulence acquires titles in proportion to the destruction it causes.
  • nyasya — depositing, placing in trust
    Gerund of ni-√as. The technical word for a nyāsa — a deposit entrusted to someone. The verse's structural irony: a thief uses the language of trust to offload stolen property. Gauḍīyas note that Akrūra's later concealment of the gem traces directly to this loaded deposit.
  • śata - yojana - gam — able to go a hundred yojanas
    Compound: śata (hundred) + yojana (a measure of distance) + ga (going). The Bhāgavata's gentle mockery — the horse's range is precisely specified, while the rider's range is zero against the Lord. Gauḍīyas read these distance-words as inversions: no horse outruns Kṛṣṇa's sudarśana.
  • yayau — he went, departed
    Perfect of √yā. Closes the verse on a verb of going — the chapter is built on goings and pursuings. Bhāgavata grammar: pāpa goes; Bhagavān goes after; pāpa cannot go far enough.
His appeal thus rejected by Akrūra also, Śatadhanvā placed the precious jewel in Akrūra’s care and fled on a horse that could travel one hundred yojanas [eight hundred miles].

The term nyasya, “leaving in the care of,” implies Śatadhanvā now believed the jewel was his; thus he was leaving it in the care of a friend. In blunt terms, this is a thief’s mentality.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His appeal thus rejected by Akrūra also, Śatadhanvā placed the precious jewel in Akrūra's care and fled on a horse that could travel one hundred yojanas [eight hundred miles].
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Śatadhanvā thought that the gem (mahā-maṇim) should be possessed by a great person. He therefore deposited it to Akrūra since he thought he was great. Viṣṇu Purāṇa says he mounted a mare. Here it is said he mounted a horse. This is a general description (including mare).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Śatadhanvā, inclined to sin or inspired by Akrūra (saḥ), thought that the gem (mahā-maṇim) should be possessed by a great person. He therefore deposited it with Akrūra since he thought he was a great devotee. Akrūra accepted it by the order of the Lord according to Śrīdhara Svāmī. There should be a great result if the jewel is kept with devotion by a great devotee. Otherwise there will be disaster. The Lord thought of the welfare of the people.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Refused by Akrūra too, Śatadhanvā places the jewel in Akrūra's care and flees on a horse capable of one hundred yojanas. The criminal entrusts the very object he killed for to a man who refused to help; desperate logic fails its own assumptions.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you entrust precious things to people you've already alienated?
  • How does desperation undermine its own plans?

Stripped of allies, Śatadhanvā hands the gem to Akrūra like a thief stuffing stolen goods into a friend's coat before running for the border. The horse can travel a hundred yojanas; pāpa imagines it can outrun Kṛṣṇa's disc.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.19

↗
गरुडध्वजमारुह्य रथं रामजनार्दनौ । अन्वयातां महावेगैरश्वै राजन् गुरुद्रुहम् ॥ १९ ॥
garuḍa-dhvajam āruhya
[garuda-dhvajam aaruhya]
rathaṁ rāma-janārdanau
[ratham raama-janaardanau]
anvayātāṁ mahā-vegair
[anvayaataam mahaa-vegair]
aśvai rājan guru-druham
[ashvai raajan guru-druham]
garuḍa - dhvajam — having the emblem of Garuḍa on its flag āruhya — mounting ratham — the chariot rāma — Balarāma janārdanau — and Kṛṣṇa anvayātām — followed mahā - vegaiḥ — very swift aśvaiḥ — by horses rājan — O King (Parīkṣit) guru — to Their superior (Satrājit, Their father-in-law) druham — the committer of violence .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
garuḍa-dhvajam āruhya
garuḍa - dhvajam
having the emblem of Garuḍa on its flag
āruhya
mounting
rathaṁ rāma-janārdanau
ratham
the chariot
rāma
Balarāma
janārdanau
and Kṛṣṇa
anvayātāṁ mahā-vegair
anvayātām
followed
mahā - vegaiḥ
very swift
aśvai rājan guru-druham
aśvaiḥ
by horses
rājan
O King (Parīkṣit)
guru
to Their superior (Satrājit, Their father-in-law)
druham
the committer of violence .
  • garuḍa - dhvajam — having the flag of Garuḍa
    Compound: garuḍa (Viṣṇu's eagle-vāhana) + dhvaja (banner). Garuḍa is Bhagavān's vehicle in His Viṣṇu-aiśvarya form. Gauḍīyas note the flag's appearance precisely when Kṛṣṇa shifts from kinsman-mode to īśvara-mode: the banner marks the register-change.
  • rāma - janārdanau — Balarāma and Kṛṣṇa
    Dual compound. Janārdana — 'agitator of (impious) men' — paired with Rāma's strength. Gauḍīyas treat the dual subject as essential: the brothers act as one center of force when the act is danda (rod, punishment).
  • guru - druham — the harmer of (Their) superior
    Compound: guru (elder / superior) + druh (one who harms). Satrājit was father-in-law to Kṛṣṇa via Satyabhāmā — a guru in the kinship sense. Bhagavān's pursuit is framed not as private vengeance but as the punishment of one who harmed a guru.
  • mahā - vegaiḥ aśvaiḥ — by very swift horses
    Compound + instrumental: mahā (great) + vega (speed) + aśva (horse). The verse opposes Śatadhanvā's hundred-yojana horse with the swift horses of Kṛṣṇa's chariot. Bhāgavata uses speed-asymmetry as one of its standard tropes for pāpa-vs-Bhagavān.
My dear King, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma mounted Kṛṣṇa’s chariot, which flew the flag of Garuḍa and was yoked with tremendously swift horses, and pursued Their elder’s murderer.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear King, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma mounted Kṛṣṇa's chariot, which flew the flag of Garuḍa and was yoked with tremendously swift horses, and pursued Their elder's murderer.
Commentary

They pursued Satadhanva, killer of their father in law (guru drohah).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Actually Garuḍa personally flew above the chariot. He appeared like a flag to the people watching.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The chariot moved with the speed of Garuḍa. Balarāma also took pleasure as a friend in the killing of the wicked (rāma). Kṛṣṇa was he who gives sorrow to the wicked or he who acts because of the prayers of his devotees (janārdanau). Because he had killed an elder it was proper that Kṛṣṇa chase him and kill him. O shining king! Śukadeva saw Parīkṣit glowing (rājan) with joy on hearing this. personally flew above the chariot. He appeared like a flag to the people watching.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)
Related verses
Concepts
GuruJiva
Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma mount the Garuḍa-flagged chariot with swift horses and pursue their elder's murderer. Pursuit is divine; speed of justice is part of the design.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you imagine justice as slow when scripture makes it swift?
  • What 'pursuit' is the Lord making on your behalf right now?

The Garuḍa-flag rises over the chariot of pursuit: Bhagavān moves under the banner of His own vāhana, the eater of serpents. Gauḍīyas read the flag as theology in cloth — Kṛṣṇa pursues evil under the standard of what consumes evil.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.20

↗
मिथिलायामुपवने विसृज्य पतितं हयम् । पद्‍भ्यामधावत् सन्त्रस्त: कृष्णोऽप्यन्वद्रवद् रुषा ॥ २० ॥
mithilāyām upavane
[mithilaayaam upavane]
visṛjya patitaṁ hayam
[visrijya patitam hayam]
padbhyām adhāvat santrastaḥ
[padbhyaam adhaavat santrastah]
kṛṣṇo ’py anvadravad ruṣā
[krishno ’py anvadravad rushaa]
mithilāyām — at Mithilā upavane — in a suburban garden visṛjya — abandoning patitam — fallen hayam — his horse padbhyām — on foot adhāvat — he ran santrastaḥ — terrified kṛṣṇaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa api — also anvadravat — ran after ruṣā — furiously .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mithilāyām upavane
mithilāyām
at Mithilā
upavane
in a suburban garden
visṛjya patitaṁ hayam
visṛjya
abandoning
patitam
fallen
hayam
his horse
padbhyām adhāvat santrastaḥ
padbhyām
on foot
adhāvat
he ran
santrastaḥ
terrified
kṛṣṇo ’py anvadravad ruṣā
kṛṣṇaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
api
also
anvadravat
ran after
ruṣā
furiously .
  • mithilāyām — at Mithilā
    The kingdom of King Janaka — a place of immense Vaiṣṇava significance. Gauḍīyas note: the same Mithilā that gave birth to Sītā now hosts Bhagavān's act of dharmic justice; the geography is doctrinally loaded.
  • patitam hayam — the fallen horse
    Past participle of √pat (to fall) + horse. The verse's central image: the boasted vehicle is now a corpse on the road. Gauḍīyas pair patita-haya with Jarāsandha's viratha-status from verse 12 — same pattern, smaller scale.
  • santrastaḥ — thoroughly terrified
    Past participle of sam-√tras. The intensified terror — santrasta, not just bhīta. Bhāgavata escalates the fear-vocabulary as Kṛṣṇa closes the distance: bhīta (v. 11), then santrasta (here).
  • ruṣā — with anger
    Instrumental of ruṣ. Bhagavān's krodha appears — but Gauḍīyas read Kṛṣṇa's anger as instrumental: ruṣā here is the rod of the īśvara, not the fever of a wronged jīva. He is angry on behalf of dharma, not on His own account.
In a garden on the outskirts of Mithilā, the horse Śatadhanvā was riding collapsed. Terrified, he abandoned the horse and began to flee on foot, with Kṛṣṇa in angry pursuit.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In a garden on the outskirts of Mithilā, the horse Śatadhanvā was riding collapsed. Terrified, he abandoned the horse and began to flee on foot, with Kṛṣṇa in angry pursuit.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa got off his chariot and ran after him since warriors should act as equals. “If he was fleeing, it is not correct to chase him.” Kṛṣṇa was angry because Śatadhanvā had killed an elder. That type of anger is permitted.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Because the horse fell down, he was terrified. Thus he fled. Kṛṣṇa ran after also on foot (api). The best of warriors will pursue a person who is on foot by going on foot also. “One should not care for person fleeing quickly in fear. One should not pursue him.” But Kṛṣṇa was angry that he had killed a friend.

Related values
Prema (Divine Love)Bhakti (Devotion)
Concepts
RasaJiva
In a garden outside Mithilā the horse collapses; terrified, Śatadhanvā abandons the horse and flees on foot with Kṛṣṇa angrily pursuing. Even the fastest escape ends in collapse; the Lord arrives on foot when wheels fail.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does your 'fast escape' actually end in collapse?
  • How does Kṛṣṇa's persistence on foot reframe your sense of His distance?

The hundred-yojana horse collapses in a Mithilā garden — the props of pāpa fail at the moment pāpa most needs them. Bhagavān continues on foot; the verse stages the truth that no vehicle delays the Lord when the rider is to be caught.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.21

↗
पदातेर्भगवांस्तस्य पदातिस्तिग्मनेमिना । चक्रेण शिर उत्कृत्य वाससोर्व्यचिनोन्मणिम् ॥ २१ ॥
padāter bhagavāṁs tasya
[padaater bhagavaams tasya]
padātis tigma-neminā
[padaatis tigma-neminaa]
cakreṇa śira utkṛtya
[chakrena shira utkritya]
vāsasor vyacinon maṇim
[vaasasor vyachinon manim]
padāteḥ — of him who was on foot bhagavān — the Supreme Lord tasya — his padātiḥ — Himself on foot tigma — sharp neminā — whose edge cakreṇa — with His disc śiraḥ — head utkṛtya — severing vāsasoḥ — within Śatadhanvā’s garments (upper and lower) vyacinot — He searched for maṇim — the jewel .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
padāter bhagavāṁs tasya
padāteḥ
of him who was on foot
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
tasya
his
padātis tigma-neminā
padātiḥ
Himself on foot
tigma
sharp
neminā
whose edge
cakreṇa śira utkṛtya
cakreṇa
with His disc
śiraḥ
head
utkṛtya
severing
vāsasor vyacinon maṇim
vāsasoḥ
within Śatadhanvā’s garments (upper and lower)
vyacinot
He searched for
maṇim
the jewel .
  • padātiḥ — Himself on foot
    From pad (foot) + ati (going). The Bhāgavata juxtaposes padāteḥ (Śatadhanvā on foot) with padātiḥ (Kṛṣṇa on foot) — Bhagavān meets the fugitive on his own terms. Gauḍīyas treat this echo as a courtesy of Kṛṣṇa's līlā: He even shares the mode of the chase.
  • cakreṇa — with the disc
    Instrumental of cakra — Sudarśana, the Lord's discus. Gauḍīya iconography: the cakra is Bhagavān's own will personified as a weapon. The disc never returns without completing its work.
  • utkṛtya — having cut off
    Gerund of ut-√kṛt. The single act that resolves Śatadhanvā's arc — the head separated from the body. Bhāgavata's narrative doesn't dwell; one verb, one verse, complete.
  • vyacinot — He searched
    Imperfect of vi-√ci. The Lord searches — Bhagavān 'looking for' a gem inside a corpse's garments. Gauḍīyas read this lokavat-anukaraṇa as central: the omniscient One stages a search to honor the human procedure that the situation calls for.
As Śatadhanvā fled on foot, the Supreme Lord, also going on foot, cut off his head with His sharp-edged disc. The Lord then searched Śatadhanvā’s upper and lower garments for the Syamantaka jewel.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As Śatadhanvā fled on foot, the Supreme Lord, also going on foot, cut off his head with His sharp-edged disc. The Lord then searched Śatadhanvā's upper and lower garments for the Syamantaka jewel.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though he was full of all knowledge (bhagavān), he searched for the jewel, to fool Balarāma, who was watching at a distance. This was because of his absorption in desiring exciting human pastimes filled with prema for his dear devotees. Not bringing Śatadhanvā to Balarāma, without asking him for news of the jewel, he cut off his head with his cakra. He did this to show his great anger at Śatadhanvā. Though Akrūra was his devotee, the Lord had a desire to punish him after some time by creating a stigma, because he had also schemed due to bad association. He hesitated to do this directly however. Because of the Lord’s desire to fulfill the desires of his devotees, and because Akrūra was qualified to possess the jewel, he also desired to give the jewel to him. Therefore Kṛṣṇa’s intention was “Taking the jewel secretly, let Akrūra flee.” This will be considered later. Hearing this news, those other than my brother will feel sorrow. After that everything will be solved.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though he was full of all knowledge (bhagavān), he searched for the jewel. He cut off his head, throwing it far away. He wanted to show that he heard from the mouth of Śatadhanvā about the jewel, to fool Balarāma, or he did this out of anger.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
On foot, the Lord cuts off the fleeing man's head with His sharp disc and searches his garments for the jewel. The act of justice is completed; the search for the asset begins immediately after.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you treat justice and recovery as separate when they belong adjacent?
  • What asset-recovery follows a needed conclusion in your life?

Kṛṣṇa runs on foot to meet the foot-running fugitive — equality of mode, asymmetry of outcome. The disc parts the head from the shoulders; the search of the garments finds no jewel. The verse ends in an absence that drives the rest of the chapter.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.22

↗
अलब्धमणिरागत्य कृष्ण आहाग्रजान्तिकम् । वृथा हत: शतधनुर्मणिस्तत्र न विद्यते ॥ २२ ॥
alabdha-maṇir āgatya
[alabdha-manir aagatya]
kṛṣṇa āhāgrajāntikam
[krishna aahaagrajaantikam]
vṛthā hataḥ śatadhanur
[vrithaa hatah shatadhanur]
maṇis tatra na vidyate
[manis tatra na vidyate]
alabdha — not finding maṇiḥ — the gem āgatya — approaching kṛṣṇaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa āha — said agra - ja — of His elder brother antikam — to the proximity vṛthā — uselessly hataḥ — killed śatadhanuḥ — Śatadhanvā maṇiḥ — the jewel tatra — with him na vidyate — is not present .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
alabdha-maṇir āgatya
alabdha
not finding
maṇiḥ
the gem
āgatya
approaching
kṛṣṇa āhāgrajāntikam
kṛṣṇaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
āha
said
agra - ja
of His elder brother
antikam
to the proximity
vṛthā hataḥ śatadhanur
vṛthā
uselessly
hataḥ
killed
śatadhanuḥ
Śatadhanvā
maṇis tatra na vidyate
maṇiḥ
the jewel
tatra
with him
na vidyate
is not present .
  • alabdha - maṇiḥ — having not obtained the jewel
    Compound: a-labdha (not obtained) + maṇi (gem). The verse opens on a negation — Bhagavān is named by what He has not found. Gauḍīyas read this as deliberate self-effacement: the īśvara consents to be the one without.
  • agra - ja — elder brother
    Compound: agra (front, prior) + ja (born). Standard kinship term for elder brother; here it foregrounds the dāsya-bhāva Kṛṣṇa shows to Balarāma even in His Dvārakā kṣatriya register. Gauḍīyas treat agraja as a doctrinal hinge for the brothers' rasa-relation.
  • vṛthā hataḥ — uselessly killed
    Adverb vṛthā (in vain) + past participle of √han. Bhagavān admits the act looks futile. Bhāgavata's confidence in His readers: He stages futility because the next verse, in Balarāma's mouth, will resolve it.
  • na vidyate — is not present, does not exist
    Present passive of √vid (to find / be). The verse closes on absence — the jewel 'is not found.' Gauḍīyas note the philosophical resonance: Bhagavān can speak even the language of 'na vidyate' when the līlā calls for it.
Not finding the jewel, Lord Kṛṣṇa went to His elder brother and said, “We have killed Śatadhanvā uselessly. The jewel isn’t here.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Not finding the jewel, Lord Kṛṣṇa went to His elder brother and said, "We have killed Śatadhanvā uselessly. The jewel isn't here."
Commentary

Though Krsna, being omniscient, knew that Akrura had the jewel, he made a show of searching for it on Satadhanva’s body to Balarama who was following far behind. By doing this he was able to separate himself from Balarama, so that Balarama could give mercy to his pure devotee king Bahulasva in Mitihila.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Coming near Balarāṁa, he said “He has been uselessly killed.” The spies have given us the wrong information.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

It is improper to fool an elder brother. Speaking to him directly, Balarāma is only called elder brother with the expression agrajāntikam. The jewel is not on Śatyadhanvā (tasmin).

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Not finding the jewel, Kṛṣṇa tells Balarāma: 'We have killed Śatadhanvā uselessly. The jewel isn't here.' The Lord names what looks like a failed mission; honesty about apparently incomplete victory.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could honest admission that 'we didn't get what we came for' be part of a real campaign?
  • How does the Lord's frankness model your own debriefs?

Kṛṣṇa returns to Balarāma empty-handed and admits — 'vṛthā hataḥ,' uselessly killed. Even Bhagavān can speak in the register of frustrated investigation. The verse is one of the Bhāgavata's gentlest demonstrations that omniscience consents to play the role of a man with empty hands.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.23

↗
तत आह बलो नूनं स मणि: शतधन्वना । कस्मिंश्चित् पुरुषे न्यस्तस्तमन्वेष पुरं व्रज ॥ २३ ॥
tata āha balo nūnaṁ
[tata aaha balo noonam]
sa maṇiḥ śatadhanvanā
[sa manih shatadhanvanaa]
kasmiṁścit puruṣe nyastas
[kasmimshchit purushe nyastas]
tam anveṣa puraṁ vraja
[tam anvesha puram vraja]
tataḥ — then āha — said balaḥ — Lord Balarāma nūnam — certainly saḥ — that maṇiḥ — jewel śatadhanvanā — by Śatadhanvā kasmiṁścit — with some particular puruṣe — person nyastaḥ — left tam — him anveṣa — search out puram — to the city vraja — go .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tata āha balo nūnaṁ
tataḥ
then
āha
said
balaḥ
Lord Balarāma
nūnam
certainly
sa maṇiḥ śatadhanvanā
saḥ
that
maṇiḥ
jewel
śatadhanvanā
by Śatadhanvā
kasmiṁścit puruṣe nyastas
kasmiṁścit
with some particular
puruṣe
person
nyastaḥ
left
tam anveṣa puraṁ vraja
tam
him
anveṣa
search out
puram
to the city
vraja
go .
  • nūnam — certainly, surely
    Adverb of confident inference. Balarāma's tone in the verse: assured, decisive. Gauḍīya tradition associates Balarāma with the buddhi-aspect of Bhagavān's līlā — He supplies the clarity Kṛṣṇa wants supplied.
  • kasmiṁścit puruṣe — with some particular person
    Indefinite pronoun kasmiṁścit (locative) + puruṣa (person). The verse names no name yet; the inference is structural. Bhāgavata builds suspense even while Bhagavān internally already knows.
  • nyastaḥ — deposited, entrusted
    Past participle of ni-√as — repeating the verb from verse 18 where Śatadhanvā made the deposit. The narrative reuses the technical term to close the inferential loop. Gauḍīyas observe Bhāgavata's word-economy: the same verb opens the question and answers it.
  • anveṣa — search out
    Imperative of anu-√iṣ. Balarāma instructs Kṛṣṇa to investigate — the brother who can give instructions to the Supreme is one of the Bhāgavata's structural marvels. Gauḍīyas frame this as Kṛṣṇa's consent to be junior in certain rasas.
To this Lord Balarāma replied, “Indeed, Śatadhanvā must have placed the jewel in the care of someone. You should return to Our city and find that person.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
To this Lord Balarāma replied, "Indeed, Śatadhanvā must have placed the jewel in the care of someone. You should return to Our city and find that person.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Balarāma speaks with affectionate anger. He speculated that Akrūra must have it since he was qualified for it. “Search for him.”

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

After that (tataḥ), after a few moments, because he was fooled by the Lord who favored Akrūra, he spoke with great intelligence. He was internally angry, with strong affection (balaḥ) for Kṛṣṇa. Probably (nūnam) the jewel was left with some person, some devotee of yours. He speaks out of angry affection.

Concepts
JivaPurushaChit
Balarāma replies: Śatadhanvā must have placed it with someone; return to the city and find that person. Each step that 'fails' yields the next clue; the elder brother reads next move from current data.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you treat a failed step as ending the project when it might be data?
  • Whose 'elder brother' wisdom could read the next step?

Balarāma reads the situation cleanly: a man fleeing for his life will deposit valuables along the way. Bhagavān's elder brother contributes the deductive step — Gauḍīyas read these joint deliberations as the rasa of sakhya layered onto kinship.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.24

↗
अहं वैदेहमिच्छामि द्रष्टुं प्रियतमं मम । इत्युक्त्वा मिथिलां राजन् विवेश यदुनन्दन: ॥ २४ ॥
ahaṁ vaideham icchāmi
[aham vaideham ichchaami]
draṣṭuṁ priyatamaṁ mama
[drashtum priyatamam mama]
ity uktvā mithilāṁ rājan
[ity uktvaa mithilaam raajan]
viveśa yada-nandanaḥ
[vivesha yada-nandanah]
aham — I vaideham — the King of Videha icchāmi — wish draṣṭum — to see priya - tamam — who is most dear mama — to Me iti — thus uktvā — saying mithilām — Mithilā (the capital of the Videha kingdom) rājan — O King (Parīkṣit) viveśa — entered yadu - nandanaḥ — Lord Balarāma, the descendant of Yadu .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ahaṁ vaideham icchāmi
aham
I
vaideham
the King of Videha
icchāmi
wish
draṣṭuṁ priyatamaṁ mama
draṣṭum
to see
priya - tamam
who is most dear
mama
to Me
ity uktvā mithilāṁ rājan
iti
thus
uktvā
saying
mithilām
Mithilā (the capital of the Videha kingdom)
rājan
O King (Parīkṣit)
viveśa yada-nandanaḥ
viveśa
entered
yadu - nandanaḥ
Lord Balarāma, the descendant of Yadu .
  • vaideham — the King of Videha (Janaka)
    Adjective from Videha — 'of Videha-land.' The kingdom whose name means 'bodiless' (because Janaka was known for living free of bodily identification). Gauḍīyas read this etymology in the niṣkāma-karma frame, not as Advaitin disembodiment.
  • priya - tamam — most dear
    Superlative of priya (dear). Balarāma calls Janaka priya-tama — dearest among the dear. Gauḍīyas treat such superlatives in the Bhāgavata as rasa-markers: Bhagavān assigns particular love to particular bhaktas, refusing impersonal even-handedness.
  • yadu - nandanaḥ — the descendant of Yadu
    Compound: yadu (the Yadu lineage) + nandana (delighter / descendant). Balarāma named here as the joy of the Yadus. Gauḍīyas note that 'nandana' echoes Nanda Mahārāja — the same affectionate root.
  • viveśa — He entered
    Perfect of vi-√viś. Balarāma enters Mithilā — a deliberate verb-choice that marks the Lord's entry into a devotee's domain as itself an event. Bhāgavata frequently elevates such entries to the rank of darśana-occasions.
“I wish to visit King Videha, who is most dear to Me.” O King, having said this, Lord Balarāma, the beloved descendant of Yadu, entered the city of Mithilā.

Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma had finally caught up with Śatadhanvā on the outskirts of Mithilā. Since the king of this city was a dear friend of Balarāma’s, the Lord decided to enter the city and spend some time there.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"I wish to visit King Videha, who is most dear to Me." O King, having said this, Lord Balarāma, the beloved descendant of Yadu, entered the city of Mithilā.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

“This jewel has caused Kṛṣṇa defamation and made him enter the cave. Though I know Akrūra has similar desires for the jewel, Kṛṣṇa did not give up partiality to him. This will create more rumors about him. Burning with grief, I cannot approach him.” Thinking in this way, Balarāma then spoke with affectionate anger. He went to Mithilā though he should have gone back to Dvārakā to give joy to the Yadus (yadu-nandanaḥ).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I will see a person who is most dear to me. You go and see who is most dear to you. Your devotees are dearer than the Yadus. Since the people of Mithilā are generally jñānīs, giving up your devotees, , I will association with jñānīs since I disagree with what you have done. He should have gone to Dvārakā to give joy to the Yadus (yadu-nandanaḥ). O king, you understand the affectionate anger of the devotees for the Lord. Or you are shining with internal anger in love.

Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Balarāma adds: I wish to visit King Videha, most dear to Me; saying so, He enters Mithilā. Personal detours are part of the schedule; missions don't preclude visiting loved ones along the way.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you postpone visits to loved ones for the sake of mission efficiency?
  • How does Balarāma model integrating personal calls with public work?

Balarāma turns aside to visit Janaka — devotional friendship has its own itinerary inside an investigation. The Bhāgavatam consistently shows how, even in the middle of urgent business, the Lord's brother makes time for the company of a bhakta-king.

Balarāma's affection for Janaka

King Janaka of Videha — the same dynastic line that produced Sītā in the Rāmāyaṇa — is treated in Vaiṣṇava tradition as a model rāja-ṛṣi, a king-sage whose detachment was praised in the Bhagavad-gītā (3.20). The Bhāgavatam at 9.13 traces the lineage and affirms his Vaiṣṇava standing.

Gauḍīyas read Balarāma's pleasure in Janaka's company against this background: Bhagavān's brother goes out of His way to honor a bhakta-king during the pursuit of a murderer. Sevā of devotees is built into the very geometry of līlā.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.25

↗
तं द‍ृष्ट्वा सहसोत्थाय मैथिल: प्रीतमानस: । अर्हयामास विधिवदर्हणीयं समर्हणै: ॥ २५ ॥
taṁ dṛṣṭvā sahasotthāya
[tam drishtvaa sahasotthaaya]
maithilaḥ prīta-mānasaḥ
[maithilah preeta-maanasah]
arhayāṁ āsa vidhi-vad
[arhayaam aasa vidhi-vad]
arhaṇīyaṁ samarhaṇaiḥ
[arhaneeyam samarhanaih]
tam — Him, Lord Balarāma dṛṣṭvā — seeing sahasā — immediately utthāya — rising maithilaḥ — the King of Mithilā prīta - mānasaḥ — feeling affection arhayām āsa — he honored Him vidhi - vat — in accordance with scriptural injunctions arhaṇīyam — worshipable samarhaṇaiḥ — with elaborate paraphernalia of worship .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ dṛṣṭvā sahasotthāya
tam
Him, Lord Balarāma
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
sahasā
immediately
utthāya
rising
maithilaḥ prīta-mānasaḥ
maithilaḥ
the King of Mithilā
prīta - mānasaḥ
feeling affection
arhayāṁ āsa vidhi-vad
arhayām āsa
he honored Him
vidhi - vat
in accordance with scriptural injunctions
arhaṇīyaṁ samarhaṇaiḥ
arhaṇīyam
worshipable
samarhaṇaiḥ
with elaborate paraphernalia of worship .
  • sahasā — immediately, at once
    Adverb. The promptness is doctrinal: a bhakta-king does not weigh decorum when Bhagavān appears. Gauḍīyas read sahasā as a marker of spontaneous bhāva — the rāja-ṛṣi's body responds before his protocol can.
  • prīta - mānasaḥ — with affectionate mind
    Compound: prīta (delighted, loving) + mānasa (mind). Bhāgavatam grammar of bhakti: not 'pleased to see' but 'a mind made of pleasure.' Gauḍīyas link prīti to one of the technical names of the sthāyi-bhāva that grows into prema.
  • vidhi - vat — according to scriptural injunction
    Compound: vidhi (rule, injunction) + vat (like, according to). The worship is not improvised but follows śāstra. Gauḍīyas note: bhakti and vidhi are not opposed when the heart is right — Janaka offers worship that is at once spontaneous and scriptural.
  • arhaṇīyam — the worshipable one
    Gerundive of √arh. Balarāma is the proper object of worship — Bhāgavata insists on Bhagavān's worshipability even at the moment He is receiving the worship. Gauḍīyas regard Balarāma as the original ārādhya for those in the sakhya-mood of His associates.
The King of Mithilā immediately rose from his seat when he saw Lord Balarāma approaching. With great love the King honored the supremely worshipable Lord by offering Him elaborate worship, as stipulated by scriptural injunctions.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The King of Mithilā immediately rose from his seat when he saw Lord Balarāma approaching. With great love the King honored the supremely worshipable Lord by offering Him elaborate worship, as stipulated by scriptural injunctions.
Commentary

Understanding that Krsna, who was omniscient, was fooling him, Balarama, with covered anger, said, "I will go to Mithila. You go to Dvaraka and give the jewel to your beloved, but I will not go to Dvaraka."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The king rose suddenly because Balarāma came unexpectedly and alone. He worshipped him with the best articles (samarhaṇaiḥ) worthy for honoring someone (arhanīyam). Instead of arhaṇīyaṁ sometimes arhaṇam vai is seen. Vai means famous.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Janaka rises immediately upon seeing Balarāma, honoring Him with elaborate worship as scripture stipulates. Royal protocol honors divine arrival fully; no abbreviation when the Supreme visits.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you abbreviate proper protocol when the Lord visits?
  • What elaborate welcome could you actually offer?

Janaka rises the instant he sees Balarāma — the body of a true bhakta does not need its mind's permission to stand for Bhagavān. Gauḍīyas treat this rising as the somatic signature of sajātīya-prīti, recognition by a like-natured soul.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.26

↗
उवास तस्यां कतिचिन्मिथिलायां समा विभु: । मानित: प्रीतियुक्तेन जनकेन महात्मना । ततोऽशिक्षद् गदां काले धार्तराष्ट्र: सुयोधन: ॥ २६ ॥
uvāsa tasyāṁ katicin
[uvaasa tasyaam katichin]
mithilāyāṁ samā vibhuḥ
[mithilaayaam samaa vibhuh]
mānitaḥ prīti-yuktena
[maanitah preeti-yuktena]
janakena mahātmanā
[janakena mahaatmanaa]
tato ’śikṣad gadāṁ kāle
[tato ’shikshad gadaam kaale]
dhārtarāṣṭraḥ suyodhanaḥ
[dhaartaraashtrah suyodhanah]
uvāsa — He lived tasyām — there katicit — several mithilāyām — in Mithila samāḥ — years vibhuḥ — the almighty Lord, Śrī Balarāma mānitaḥ — honored prīti - yuktena — affectionate janakena — by King Janaka (Videha) mahā - ātmanā — the great soul tataḥ — then aśikṣat — learned gadām — the club kāle — in time dhārtarāṣṭraḥ — the son of Dhṛtarāṣṭra suyodhanaḥ — Duryodhana .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uvāsa tasyāṁ katicin
uvāsa
He lived
tasyām
there
katicit
several
mithilāyāṁ samā vibhuḥ
mithilāyām
in Mithila
samāḥ
years
vibhuḥ
the almighty Lord, Śrī Balarāma
mānitaḥ prīti-yuktena
mānitaḥ
honored
prīti - yuktena
affectionate
janakena mahātmanā
janakena
by King Janaka (Videha)
mahā - ātmanā
the great soul
tato ’śikṣad gadāṁ kāle
tataḥ
then
dhārtarāṣṭraḥ suyodhanaḥ
aśikṣat
learned
gadām
the club
kāle
in time
dhārtarāṣṭraḥ
the son of Dhṛtarāṣṭra
suyodhanaḥ
Duryodhana .
  • vibhuḥ — the almighty Lord
    From vi-√bhū. One of Bhagavān's standard epithets for His all-pervading capacity. Gauḍīyas: vibhu does not mean impersonal omnipresence but the personal Lord whose presence pervades by His will.
  • mānitaḥ — honored
    Past participle of √man. Janaka honors Balarāma; the Bhāgavatam records the honoring as a mutual gift — the king's offering and the Lord's acceptance both. Gauḍīyas read mānana as one of the limbs of vaidhi-bhakti.
  • janakena — by Janaka
    Instrumental of Janaka. The same name famous from BG 3.20 — Gauḍīyas insist on the niṣkāma-karma-yogī reading rather than the Advaitin gloss. Janaka is a Vaiṣṇava rāja-ṛṣi, not a merger-philosopher.
  • gadām — the club (mace)
    Accusative of gadā. Balarāma's signature weapon. Gauḍīya iconography places the gadā in His hand as the instrument of strength yoked to His agraja-rasa toward Kṛṣṇa — strength placed at the service of relationship.
  • suyodhanaḥ — Duryodhana
    Literally 'good fighter' (su- + yodhana) — the Mahābhārata's irony, the original name of one who would prove the opposite of dharma. Gauḍīyas read the name etymology as the Bhāgavata's quiet judgment on his trajectory.
The almighty Lord Balarāma stayed in Mithilā for several years, honored by His affectionate devotee Janaka Mahārāja. During that time Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s son Duryodhana learned from Balarāma the art of fighting with a club.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The almighty Lord Balarāma stayed in Mithilā for several years, honored by His affectionate devotee Janaka Mahārāja. During that time Dhṛtarāṣṭra's son Duryodhana learned from Balarāma the art of fighting with a club.
Commentary

Balarama was respected by the king.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The Lord (vibhuḥ) stayed there for some time to protect his devotee. Because of his anger at Kṛṣṇa he would not go back. Thus when the occasion arose (kale) he taught Duryodhana the art of fighting with the club. He did this at the instigation of Dhṛtarāṣtṛa, who was expert at giving bad advice. Balarāma was respected by Janaka, whose mind was great (mahātmanā) because of concentrating on Kṛṣṇa and his devotees.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though he was particularly the elder brother of Kṛṣṇa (vibhuḥ), he stayed in Mithilā (tasyām), generally devoid of devotees. Or he, the Lord, stayed there, being worshipped in that way (tasyām). Because of anger, because of living there or after that (tataḥ) for a long time (kāle), since Duryodhana could not learn quickly, he taught him the club on the opportunity of being separated from Kṛṣṇa. Or at an opportunity suitable for teaching, he did this at the instigation of Dhṛtarāṣtṛa, who was expert at giving bad advice. Suyodhana means one who happily fights. Balarāma was respected by Janaka, who had devotion and who was inclined to jñāna (mahātmanā), seeing everything equally. He was different from another person of Mithilā who would go to the Lord. Or by the power of Balarāma’s mercy, Janaka’s devotion increased.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Balarāma stays in Mithilā several years, honored by Janaka; during that time Duryodhana learns the art of club-fighting from Balarāma. Even side detours produce major future consequences; Mithilā teaching becomes a Mahābhārata factor.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do unplanned stays end up training the very people who later use the training against allies?
  • How does the Lord know what He's teaching and to whom?

Balarāma teaches Duryodhana the gadā in Mithilā — the Lord transmits expertise without regard to the student's future trajectory. Gauḍīyas read this as a sobering paradox of līlā: divine instruction is not the same as divine sanction; the gadā Balarāma gives will be raised against Bhīma at Kurukṣetra.

Duryodhana versus Bhīma's club

Years later, at the close of the Kurukṣetra war, Duryodhana — taught the gadā by Balarāma here in Mithilā — fought Bhīma in the climactic single combat of the Mahābhārata. Bhīma struck him below the navel in violation of the rules of fair gadā-yuddha, an act that Balarāma denounced and Kṛṣṇa defended (Mahābhārata, Śalya-parva).

Gauḍīyas read this whole arc against the present verse: Balarāma teaches both Bhīma and Duryodhana the same weapon; the rasa-difference between teacher and student determines which use of the gadā the Lord finally vindicates. Instruction is gift; bhāva is destiny.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.27

↗
केशवो द्वारकामेत्य निधनं शतधन्वन: । अप्राप्तिं च मणे: प्राह प्रियाया: प्रियकृद् विभु: ॥ २७ ॥
keśavo dvārakām etya
[keshavo dvaarakaam etya]
nidhanaṁ śatadhanvanaḥ
[nidhanam shatadhanvanah]
aprāptiṁ ca maṇeḥ prāha
[apraaptim cha maneh praaha]
priyāyāḥ priya-kṛd vibhuḥ
[priyaayaah priya-krid vibhuh]
keśavaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa dvārakām — to Dvārakā etya — coming nidhanam — the demise śatadhanvanaḥ — of Śatadhanvā aprāptim — the failure to obtain ca — and maṇeḥ — the jewel prāha — he told priyāyāḥ — of His beloved (Queen Satyabhāmā) priya — the pleasure kṛt — doing vibhuḥ — the all-powerful Lord .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
keśavo dvārakām etya
keśavaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
dvārakām
to Dvārakā
etya
coming
nidhanaṁ śatadhanvanaḥ
nidhanam
the demise
śatadhanvanaḥ
of Śatadhanvā
aprāptiṁ ca maṇeḥ prāha
aprāptim
the failure to obtain
ca
and
maṇeḥ
the jewel
prāha
he told
priyāyāḥ priya-kṛd vibhuḥ
priyāyāḥ
of His beloved (Queen Satyabhāmā)
priya
the pleasure
kṛt
doing
vibhuḥ
the all-powerful Lord .
  • keśavaḥ — Kṛṣṇa (with beautiful hair)
    From keśa (hair) + va (possessing). Gauḍīyas also derive it as Ka (Brahmā) + īśa (Śiva) + vaḥ (governs both) — Bhagavān as origin of Brahmā and Śiva. The Vraja-flavored 'lovely-haired one' and the cosmological gloss coexist.
  • nidhanam — demise, death
    From ni-√dhā (to lay down). The respectful term for death — used here for Śatadhanvā even though he was the criminal. Bhāgavata maintains decorum in mortuary language regardless of moral weight.
  • aprāptim — the not-obtaining
    From a- (not) + prāpti (obtaining). The gem was not found — Bhagavān reports the result honestly to His wife. Gauḍīyas note: Bhagavān does not conceal His apparent failure from His own; the priya-bhāva includes admission.
  • priya - kṛt — doing what is pleasing
    Compound: priya (dear, pleasing) + kṛt (doer). The Bhāgavata's word for Kṛṣṇa's tact — speaking in a way that pleases the beloved. Gauḍīyas: even Bhagavān's news-delivery is an act of bhakti toward His own devotees.
Lord Keśava arrived in Dvārakā and described the demise of Śatadhanvā and His own failure to find the Syamantaka jewel. He spoke in a way that would please His beloved, Satyabhāmā.

Naturally Queen Satyabhāmā was pleased to hear that her father’s murderer had been brought to justice. But her father’s Syamantaka jewel still had to be recovered, and thus she was also pleased to hear of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s determination to recover it.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Keśava arrived in Dvārakā and described the demise of Śatadhanvā and His own failure to find the Syamantaka jewel. He spoke in a way that would please His beloved, Satyabhāmā.
Commentary

The Lord, the comforter of his beloved (priyayah priya krt),said "I was unable to keep your father alive, because he had a short lifespan, but I have killed his killer with my own hand."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He is called Keśava because he controls Brahmā (ka) and Śiva (īśa) or because he killed Keśī easily. Because of such power he returned quickly to Dvārakā. He described the details (pra—āha) such as chasing Śatadhanvā for a long distance. He was able to kill Śatadhanvā because he was the Lord (vibhuḥ). Because he was controlled by prema he pleased his beloved (priyakṛt).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He was directly the Lord (keśavaḥ), pervading everywhere (vibhuḥ) with his unlimited powers. He showed more affection for Satyabhāmā than to Rukmiṇī and Jāmbavatī. He spoke to her about the death of Śatadhanvā, running after him etc. Or though he was most affectionate to her (priya-kṛt), he spoke about not attaining the jewel, since he particularly loved the devotees more than his beloveds (vibhuḥ). He was favoring Akrūra. Or he spread the universe with his māyā (vibhuḥ), fooling even his beloved. Śukadeva with special bhāva speaks with envy.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Titiksha (Forbearance / Endurance)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Shanti (Peace / Tranquility)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)
Related verses
Concepts
MayaBhavaJiva
Keśava arrives in Dvārakā and describes Śatadhanvā's demise and His failure to find the jewel, in a way that pleases Satyabhāmā. Even partial victory is presented gently to the bereaved; how news is told matters.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you tell partial victories gracelessly that could be told well?
  • How does Kṛṣṇa's gentleness in reporting model your own?

Kṛṣṇa returns to Dvārakā and frames the news to spare Satyabhāmā the worst of the truth — Bhagavān can choose what to say and what to gentle, even when He knows everything. Gauḍīyas treat priya-kṛt as a doctrinal feature: the Lord's love is also tactful.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.28

↗
तत: स कारयामास क्रिया बन्धोर्हतस्य वै । साकं सुहृद्भ‍िर्भगवान् या या: स्यु: साम्परायिकी: ॥ २८ ॥
tataḥ sa kārayām āsa
[tatah sa kaarayaam aasa]
kriyā bandhor hatasya vai
[kriyaa bandhor hatasya vai]
sākaṁ suhṛdbhir bhagavān
[saakam suhridbhir bhagavaan]
yā yāḥ syuḥ sāmparāyikīḥ
[yaa yaah syuh saamparaayikeeh]
tataḥ — then saḥ — He, Lord Kṛṣṇa kārayām āsa — had done kriyā — the ritual duties bandhoḥ — for His relative (Satrājit) hatasya — killed vai — indeed sākam — together with suhṛdbhiḥ — well-wishers bhagavān — the Supreme Lord yāḥ yāḥ — all which syuḥ — there are sāmparāyikīḥ — for the time of one’s departure from this world .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ sa kārayām āsa
tataḥ
then
saḥ
He, Lord Kṛṣṇa
kārayām āsa
had done
kriyā bandhor hatasya vai
kriyā
the ritual duties
bandhoḥ
for His relative (Satrājit)
hatasya
killed
vai
indeed
sākaṁ suhṛdbhir bhagavān
sākam
together with
suhṛdbhiḥ
well-wishers
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
yā yāḥ syuḥ sāmparāyikīḥ
yāḥ yāḥ
all which
syuḥ
there are
sāmparāyikīḥ
for the time of one’s departure from this world .
  • kriyā — ritual duties
    From √kṛ. The technical śrāddha-rites for the deceased. Gauḍīyas read Kṛṣṇa's punctilious performance as the Bhāgavata's settling of the Syamantaka-controversy: the man who had been falsely suspected of theft now buries the man who suspected Him.
  • bandhoḥ — of the kinsman
    Genitive of bandhu (relative, bound one). Satrājit, His father-in-law via Satyabhāmā. The kinship-word is precise — Bhāgavata catalogues the relationship that makes Kṛṣṇa's act dutiful, not merely magnanimous.
  • suhṛdbhiḥ — with well-wishers
    Instrumental plural of suhṛd (good-hearted one, well-wisher). One of the Bhāgavata's master-terms for devotees and friends. Gauḍīyas treat suhṛd as the suffix that marks any community gathered around Bhagavān — the funeral becomes a satsaṅga.
  • sāmparāyikīḥ — (rites) pertaining to the departure from this world
    From samparāya (the passage between worlds, the afterlife transition). The technical adjective for funeral rites. Gauḍīyas note: Bhāgavata treats the post-mortem rites as legitimate dharma even within a bhakti-centric cosmos — bhakti perfects dharma, it does not abolish it.
Lord Kṛṣṇa then had the various funeral rites performed for His deceased relative, Satrājit. The Lord attended the funeral along with well-wishers of the family.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Kṛṣṇa then had the various funeral rites performed for His deceased relative, Satrājit. The Lord attended the funeral along with well-wishers of the family.
Commentary

Krsna performed the funeral rites for Satrajit (bandhuh.)

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

After that (tataḥ) he had all (yā yāḥ) the funeral rites performed by Satyabhāmā for his relative killed (hatasya) by a weapon by a thief. Vai indicates it was well known.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

After that (tataḥ) he had all (yā yāḥ) the funeral rites performed by Satyabhāmā or a priest for his relative killed (hatasya) by a weapon by a thief. Vai indicates it was well known, because he was most merciful (bhagavān) or the supreme Lord appearing in the world to spread dharma, to teach people. Or he did these rites even though he is bhagavān (and does not need to), because he is affectionate to his friends (bandhoḥ).

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
The Lord has funeral rites performed for Satrājit and attends with family well-wishers. After justice and reporting comes ritual; the dead receive proper rites even when they were partly responsible.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you skip rituals because the deceased was partly at fault?
  • How could proper rites still be offered for the imperfect?

Kṛṣṇa performs the funeral rites for Satrājit — the same Satrājit who had once accused Him publicly. The Lord buries the relative who slandered Him, with His relatives standing alongside. Gauḍīyas read these last rites as the inverse of grudge: Bhagavān's memory is selective in the direction of forgiveness.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.29

↗
अक्रूर: कृतवर्मा च श्रुत्वा शतधनोर्वधम् । व्यूषतुर्भयवित्रस्तौ द्वारकाया: प्रयोजकौ ॥ २९ ॥
akrūraḥ kṛtavarmā ca
[akroorah kritavarmaa cha]
śrutvā śatadhanor vadham
[shrutvaa shatadhanor vadham]
vyūṣatur bhaya-vitrastau
[vyooshatur bhaya-vitrastau]
dvārakāyāḥ prayojakau
[dvaarakaayaah prayojakau]
akrūraḥ kṛtavarmā ca — Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā śrutvā — hearing about śatadhanoḥ — of Śatadhanvā vadham — the killing vyūṣatuḥ — they went into exile bhaya - vitrastau — seized with overwhelming fear dvārakāyāḥ — from Dvārakā prayojakau — the engagers .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
akrūraḥ kṛtavarmā ca
akrūraḥ kṛtavarmā ca
Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā
śrutvā śatadhanor vadham
śrutvā
hearing about
śatadhanoḥ
of Śatadhanvā
vadham
the killing
vyūṣatur bhaya-vitrastau
vyūṣatuḥ
they went into exile
bhaya - vitrastau
seized with overwhelming fear
dvārakāyāḥ prayojakau
dvārakāyāḥ
from Dvārakā
prayojakau
the engagers .
  • prayojakau — the two who engaged / instigated
    From pra-√yuj — to engage, set into motion. The technical word for the cause behind a cause; in Mīmāṁsā vocabulary, the instigator of an action. Bhāgavata's verdict on Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā: they are not bystanders but engineers.
  • bhaya - vitrastau — seized with fear, terrified
    Compound: bhaya (fear) + vitrasta (extremely frightened). Same fear-vocabulary as verse 11's bhīta but intensified. Gauḍīyas note: pāpa-karma's natural climate is bhaya — the conspirators end the chapter in the same emotional weather as their victim.
  • vyūṣatuḥ — they went into exile / departed
    Perfect dual of vi-√vas (to dwell apart). The verb of voluntary exile. Bhāgavata's narrative pattern: those who break with Kṛṣṇa eventually depart from His dhāma, even if no one banishes them.
  • dvārakāyāḥ — from Dvārakā
    Ablative of Dvārakā — 'the city of gates,' Bhagavān's seat. Gauḍīyas read leaving Dvārakā as a form of self-imposed asat-saṅga: removing oneself from the place where Kṛṣṇa walks is its own punishment.
When Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā, who had originally incited Śatadhanvā to commit his crime, heard that he had been killed, they fled Dvārakā in terror and took up residence elsewhere.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā, who had originally incited Śatadhanvā to commit his crime, heard that he had been killed, they fled Dvārakā in terror and took up residence elsewhere.
Commentary

They quickly fled from Dvaraka to somewhere else, because they were the instigators (prayojika) for Satadhanva killing Satrajit.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The two previously believed that Śatadhanvā would not be killed since he was known as a Yādava. Now, hearing that he had been killed, they were even more terrified (vi—trastau).

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
When Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā hear Śatadhanvā is killed, they flee Dvārakā in terror and take residence elsewhere. The inciters realize their exposure and flee; complicity has its own consequences.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you fled rather than facing complicity?
  • How does location-change function as soft confession?

Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā, who set the conspiracy in motion, slip out of Dvārakā the way smoke leaves a closing window — Śatadhanvā's death frightens them into the same exile they had imagined for their target. Gauḍīyas read this as the lawful symmetry of pāpa: the engagers (prayojakau) inherit the fate they engineered.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.30

↗
अक्रूरे प्रोषितेऽरिष्टान्यासन् वै द्वारकौकसाम् । शारीरा मानसास्तापा मुहुर्दैविकभौतिका: ॥ ३० ॥
akrūre proṣite ’riṣṭāny
[akroore proshite ’rishtaany]
āsan vai dvārakaukasām
[aasan vai dvaarakaukasaam]
śārīrā mānasās tāpā
[shaareeraa maanasaas taapaa]
muhur daivika-bhautikāḥ
[muhur daivika-bhautikaah]
akrūre — Akrūra proṣite — being in exile ariṣṭāni — ill omens āsan — arose vai — indeed dvārakā - okasām — for the residents of Dvārakā śārīrāḥ — caused by the body mānasaḥ — and by the mind tāpāḥ — distresses muhuḥ — repeated daivika — caused by higher powers bhautikāḥ — caused by other creatures .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
akrūre proṣite ’riṣṭāny
akrūre
Akrūra
proṣite
being in exile
āsan vai dvārakaukasām
ariṣṭāni
ill omens
āsan
arose
vai
indeed
dvārakā - okasām
for the residents of Dvārakā
śārīrā mānasās tāpā
śārīrāḥ
caused by the body
mānasaḥ
and by the mind
tāpāḥ
distresses
muhur daivika-bhautikāḥ
muhuḥ
repeated
daivika
caused by higher powers
bhautikāḥ
caused by other creatures .
  • ariṣṭāni — ill omens
    From a-riṣṭa (un-auspicious). The Bhāgavata's standard term for negative portents — disease, eclipse, drought, social disorder. Gauḍīyas treat ariṣṭa as the cosmos's signaling system, calibrated to dharmic disturbance.
  • śārīrāḥ mānasaḥ tāpāḥ — bodily and mental distresses
    Compound + noun: śārīra (bodily) + mānasa (mental) + tāpa (heat / distress). Two of the three classical tāpas — bodily, mental, and (next phrase) external. Gauḍīyas note: this verse rehearses the trividha-tāpa schema from the Bhāgavata's opening (SB 1.1.2).
  • daivika - bhautikāḥ — caused by higher powers and by creatures
    Compound pair: daivika (from devas) + bhautika (from beings). Completing the trividha schema — adhyātmika, adhidaivika, adhibhautika. The whole tāpa-taxonomy is invoked. Gauḍīyas: a city without bhaktas suffers all three at once.
  • muhuḥ — again and again
    Adverb of repetition. The distress is not a single incident but a steady weather. Bhāgavata uses muhuḥ to mark anartha that has settled into a pattern.
In Akrūra’s absence ill omens arose in Dvārakā, and the citizens began to suffer continually from physical and mental distresses, as well as from disturbances caused by higher powers and by creatures of the earth.

The word daivika here refers to disturbances caused by supernatural beings. These disturbances often manifest as natural calamities like earthquakes, tidal waves or extreme weather. Nowadays materialistic people attribute these disturbances to earthly causes, not realizing that they constitute punishment at the hands of superior beings. The word bhautikāḥ refers to trouble caused by fellow creatures of the earth, such as human beings, animals and insects. According to Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī, Akrūra took the Syamantaka jewel and went to reside in the city of Benares, where he became known as Dānapati, “the master of charity.” There he executed fire sacrifices on gold altars with elaborate assemblies of qualified priests. Some residents of Dvārakā felt that the unusual calamities were due to Akrūra’s absence, forgetting (as described in the next verse) that the Supreme Lord’s personal presence in Dvārakā precluded that possibility. Because when the Lord comes to earth His pastimes resemble those of human beings, the principle of “familiarity breeds contempt” comes into play. It appears that during the lives of many saintly persons and incarnations of God there always exists a class of people who fail to appreciate, or who only occasionally appreciate, the position of the great souls among them. On the other hand, the fortunate and enlightened souls who recognize the true position of the Lord and His associates are supremely blessed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In Akrūra's absence ill omens arose in Dvārakā, and the citizens began to suffer continually from physical and mental distresses, as well as from disturbances caused by higher powers and by creatures of the earth.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Ariṣṭāni refers to calamities like earthquakes. Another version has ariṣṭā. In that case the masculine form is poetic license. There were various sufferings (verb is understood) of the body and mind which were ādhyāmika suffering, caused by one’s own body. There were also daivikā sufferings (caused by nature) and bhautika (caused by other living entities) sufferings.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
In Akrūra's absence, ill omens arise in Dvārakā; citizens suffer physical and mental distress, disturbances from higher powers and earthly creatures. The absence of a particular devotee can affect a whole city; certain people's presence is structural.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose absence in your community is causing community-wide ill omen?
  • How does this verse honor specific devotees as actually loadbearing?

Akrūra leaves and the city begins to ail — the rains miss, the body and mind unsettle, omens stack up. The Bhāgavatam shows how the absence of a great bhakta is felt at the level of weather. Gauḍīyas read this as evidence that devotee-presence is itself a kind of yoga-kṣema for a city.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.31

↗
इत्यङ्गोपदिशन्त्येके विस्मृत्य प्रागुदाहृतम् । मुनिवासनिवासे किं घटेतारिष्टदर्शनम् ॥ ३१ ॥
ity aṅgopadiśanty eke
[ity angopadishanty eke]
vismṛtya prāg udāhṛtam
[vismritya praag udaahritam]
muni-vāsa-nivāse kiṁ
[muni-vaasa-nivaase kim]
ghaṭetāriṣṭa-darśanam
[ghatetaarishta-darshanam]
iti — thus aṅga — my dear (King Parīkṣit) upadiśanti — were proposing eke — some vismṛtya — forgetting prāk — previously udāhṛtam — what had been described muni — of sages vāsa — the residence nivāse — when He is residing kim — how ghaṭeta — can arise ariṣṭa — of calamities darśanam — the appearance .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity aṅgopadiśanty eke
iti
thus
aṅga
my dear (King Parīkṣit)
upadiśanti
were proposing
eke
some
vismṛtya prāg udāhṛtam
vismṛtya
forgetting
prāk
previously
udāhṛtam
what had been described
muni-vāsa-nivāse kiṁ
muni
of sages
vāsa
the residence
nivāse
when He is residing
kim
how
ghaṭetāriṣṭa-darśanam
ghaṭeta
can arise
ariṣṭa
of calamities
darśanam
the appearance .
  • vismṛtya — having forgotten
    Gerund of vi-√smṛ. The opposite of smaraṇa (one of the nine limbs of bhakti). Gauḍīyas treat vismṛti as the structural disease of conditioned existence — the elders themselves had spoken Kṛṣṇa's glories before; they have simply forgotten what they said.
  • muni - vāsa — the residence of sages
    Compound: muni (sage) + vāsa (dwelling). One of Kṛṣṇa's titles — He in whom all sages reside. Gauḍīyas note: where Bhagavān lives, the company of sages is automatic; therefore calamity at His residence is a contradiction in terms.
  • ariṣṭa - darśanam — the appearance of calamities
    Compound: ariṣṭa (ill omen) + darśana (sight, appearance). Śuka's rhetorical question: how can ariṣṭa-darśana arise where Bhagavān is? Gauḍīyas: the verse is a teaching about the impossibility of calamity at Kṛṣṇa's dhāma — the elders' theory is wrong even before its premise.
  • upadiśanti — they were proposing / advising
    Present plural of upa-√diś (to point out, instruct). The verb that should belong to Bhagavān or guru is here used (with a touch of irony) for the bewildered elders. Bhāgavata's grammar: upadeśa misapplied is the symptom of forgetting.
Some men proposed [that the troubles were due to Akrūra’s absence], but they had forgotten the glories of the Supreme Lord, which they themselves had so often described. Indeed, how can calamities occur in a place where the Personality of Godhead, the residence of all the sages, resides?

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī provides the following insight on this verse: In Benares Akrūra became famous for performing sacrifices on golden altars and for his abundant charity to the brāhmaṇas. When the citizens of Dvārakā heard about this, some of them gossiped that Kṛṣṇa, considering Akrūra a rival, had sent him into exile. To dispel this new and incredible stain on His reputation, Lord Kṛṣṇa created various calamities in Dvārakā, thus inducing the citizens to call for Akrūra’s return, which the Lord then ordered.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some men proposed [that the troubles were due to Akrūra's absence], but they had forgotten the glories of the Supreme Lord, which they themselves had so often described. Indeed, how can calamities occur in a place where the Personality of Godhead, the residence of all the sages, resides?
Commentary

As a result of his offenses to the gopis of Vraja by taking Krsna , Akrura also had to experience many years of separation from Krsna, and to live in Kasi among Krsna’s enemies. As many years as Baladeva stayed in Mithila, Akrura stayed in Kasi. Hearing how he was giving charity to many brahmanas and doing sacrifices on an altar of gold, people began to gossip that Krsna had Akrura sent to Kasi. Though Balarama, Rukmini and others did not believe the rumors, in order to clear his name, Krsna created many calamities in Dvaraka in order to bring Akrura back. After stating the munis' proposition that Dvaraka was suffering due to the influence of time mentioned in verse 30 it is defeated in verse 31. Some (eke) such as vaisampayana muni, forgetting their previous words (prag udahrtam) in praise of Krsna, began to speak. However, if a muni residing in a village prevents calamity, what calamity to happen in the abode of Krsna who is the shelter of all munis (muni vasa)?

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Some like Vaiśampāyana, forgetting what they had previously said in praise of the Lord, not remembering this, attributed the calamities to Akrūra’s absence. How could calamities happen in the continual residence of the Lord (nivāse), who gives shelter (vāsa) to all sages? Even if one sage lived there, such calamities could not happen. Even one calamity should not happen, what to speak of many varieties. It should be understood that this was the will of the Lord. He produced these calamities in order to provide a pretext for bringing back Akrūra.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Darshana
Some men propose the troubles are due to Akrūra's absence, but they have forgotten the Lord's glories which they themselves so often described — how can calamities occur where Kṛṣṇa lives? Even devotees forget the central protector under stress.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you forget what you yourself have often described about Kṛṣṇa's protection?
  • How do you re-anchor in basic theology when distressed?

Some Dvārakā elders blame Akrūra's absence — and the Bhāgavata, in Śuka's voice, gently calls this a forgetting. They have praised Kṛṣṇa Himself as the residence of all sages and now look elsewhere for the cause of calamity. Gauḍīyas read this as the chronic forgetfulness even of associates: bhakti not held tight returns to looking past Bhagavān.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.32

↗
देवेऽवर्षति काशीश: श्वफल्कायागताय वै । स्वसुतां गान्दिनीं प्रादात् ततोऽवर्षत् स्म काशिषु ॥ ३२ ॥
deve ’varṣati kāśīśaḥ
[deve ’varshati kaasheeshah]
śvaphalkāyāgatāya vai
[shvaphalkaayaagataaya vai]
sva-sutāṁ gāṇdinīṁ prādāt
[sva-sutaam gaandineem praadaat]
tato ’varṣat sma kāśiṣu
[tato ’varshat sma kaashishu]
deve — when the demigod, Lord Indra avarṣati — had not been supplying rain kāśī - īśaḥ — the King of Benares śvaphalkāya — to Śvaphalka (Akrūra’s father) āgatāya — who had come vai — certainly sva — his own sutām — daughter gāndinīm — Gāndinī prādāt — gave tataḥ — then avarṣat — it rained sma — indeed kāśiṣu — in the kingdom of Kāśī .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
deve ’varṣati kāśīśaḥ
deve
when the demigod, Lord Indra
śvaphalkāyāgatāya vai
avarṣati
had not been supplying rain
sva-sutāṁ gāṇdinīṁ prādāt
tato ’varṣat sma kāśiṣu
kāśī - īśaḥ
the King of Benares
śvaphalkāya
to Śvaphalka (Akrūra’s father)
āgatāya
who had come
vai
certainly
sva
his own
sutām
daughter
gāndinīm
Gāndinī
prādāt
gave
tataḥ
then
avarṣat
it rained
sma
indeed
kāśiṣu
in the kingdom of Kāśī .
  • avarṣati — when (Indra) was not supplying rain
    Present participle of √vṛṣ with privative a-. Drought as a localized phenomenon, traced to Indra's withholding. Gauḍīyas: in the Bhāgavata's cosmology, rain is a deva-mediated gift; it can be paused for instruction.
  • kāśī - īśaḥ — the king of Kāśī
    Compound: kāśī (Vārāṇasī) + īśa (lord). Kāśī, the ancient city of light. The king's recognition that a bhakta's arrival is the remedy for drought encodes the Bhāgavata's theology of saint-as-rain.
  • śvaphalkāya — to Śvaphalka
    Akrūra's father. Gauḍīyas treat Śvaphalka as the Bhāgavata's example of inherited bhakti — Akrūra's tenderness has a lineage; the chariot to Vraja in chapter 38 carried generations.
  • gāndinīm — Gāndinī (his daughter)
    Gāndinī, Akrūra's mother. The verse-pair is genealogical: Akrūra is the son of Śvaphalka and Gāndinī, and so the same vṛṣṭi-prabhāva attaches to him.
  • tataḥ avarṣat — then it rained
    Adverb + imperfect of √vṛṣ. The crisp Bhāgavata cause-and-effect: bhakta arrives, rain falls. Gauḍīyas: this is not magic but the structural logic of a cosmos in which Bhagavān honors His own.
[The elders said:] Previously, when Lord Indra had withheld rain from Kāsī [Benares], the king of that city gave his daughter Gāndinī to Śvaphalka, who was then visiting him. It soon rained in the kingdom of Kāśī.

Śvaphalka was Akrūra’s father, and the citizens felt that the son must have the same power as the father. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī points out that because of Akrūra’s relationship with his maternal grandfather, the King of Kāśī, in a time of difficulty Akrūra went to that city.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[The elders said:] Previously, when Lord Indra had withheld rain from Kāsī [Benares], the king of that city gave his daughter Gāndinī to Śvaphalka, who was then visiting him. It soon rained in the kingdom of Kāśī.
Commentary

Then Indra (deva) did not give rain in Kasi, the king gave his daughter to Akrura’s father in marriage. Then rain came. Akrura went to Kasi because it was the city of his maternal grandfather.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Two verses describe what people said. The king of Kāsī gave his excellent daughter along with ornaments and other goods to Akrūra’s father, Śvaphalka. The king brought Śvaphalka to Kāsī to marry his daughter. That daughter was famous for coming out the womb after a long time on the condition that she could perform a daily donation of a cow. Akrūra went to Kāsī since it was the home of his maternal grandfather.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Elders recall: when Indra withheld rain from Kāśī, its king gave his daughter Gāndinī to Śvaphalka, who was visiting; soon it rained. Family-arrangement honoring of a powerful guest can shift cosmic weather; lineage matters.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does honoring of a particular guest open weather you can't otherwise affect?
  • How does lineage of devotional households matter in your tradition?

An old story is unrolled to explain the drought: Śvaphalka, Akrūra's father, brought rain to Kāśī simply by arriving there. Gauḍīyas read these inset stories as the Bhāgavata's way of building the case for the saint as a meteorological reality — bhaktas are not symbols of mercy; their bodies are conduits of it.

Śvaphalka brings rain to Kāśī

When Indra had withheld rain from the kingdom of Kāśī (Vārāṇasī), the king investigated and was told that Śvaphalka, a Yādava of great spiritual standing, would have to be received there. The king brought him in and gave his daughter Gāndinī in marriage to him; the rains broke immediately (SB 9.24.15 and parallel Purāṇic accounts).

Gauḍīyas hold the episode as canonical proof that the body of a bhakta carries vṛṣṭi-prabhāva — the power that compels rain. The elders of Dvārakā cite the precedent here to explain (mistakenly, in part) the omens of Akrūra's absence.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.33

↗
तत्सुतस्तत्प्रभावोऽसावक्रूरो यत्र यत्र ह । देवोऽभिवर्षते तत्र नोपतापा न मारीका: ॥ ३३ ॥
tat-sutas tat-prabhāvo ’sāv
[tat-sutas tat-prabhaavo ’saav]
akrūro yatra yatra ha
[akrooro yatra yatra ha]
devo ’bhivarṣate tatra
[devo ’bhivarshate tatra]
nopatāpā na mārīkāḥ
[nopataapaa na maareekaah]
tat — his (Śvaphalka’s) sutaḥ — son tat - prabhāvaḥ — having his powers asau — he akrūraḥ — Akrūra yatra yatra — wherever ha — indeed devaḥ — Lord Indra abhivarṣate — will provide rain tatra — there na — no upatāpāḥ — painful disturbances na — no mārikāḥ — untimely deaths .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat-sutas tat-prabhāvo ’sāv
tat
his (Śvaphalka’s)
sutaḥ
son
tat - prabhāvaḥ
having his powers
asau
he
akrūro yatra yatra ha
akrūraḥ
Akrūra
yatra yatra
wherever
ha
indeed
devo ’bhivarṣate tatra
devaḥ
Lord Indra
abhivarṣate
will provide rain
tatra
there
nopatāpā na mārīkāḥ
na
no
upatāpāḥ
painful disturbances
na
no
mārikāḥ
untimely deaths .
  • tat - prabhāvaḥ — having his (father's) power
    Compound: tat (his) + prabhāva (power, influence). Prabhāva in Vaiṣṇava theology denotes inherited or conferred capacity — not the bhakta's own but Bhagavān's working through him. Gauḍīyas: the elders' framing is right in form, wrong in attribution.
  • yatra yatra — wherever
    Distributive locative — 'in whatever place.' The Bhāgavata's universal quantifier for a bhakta's traveling influence. The same pattern recurs in BG 18.78 ('yatra yogeśvaraḥ kṛṣṇaḥ').
  • abhivarṣate — will provide rain
    Present middle of abhi-√vṛṣ. Indra rains 'toward' / 'upon' the place where Akrūra is. Gauḍīyas read abhi- prefixes in such verbs as the divine attention toward a particular site — rain is intentional, not random.
  • upatāpāḥ — painful disturbances
    From upa-√tap (to scorch). The technical word for afflictions that 'heat' the body and mind. Gauḍīyas: where a bhakta lives, upatāpa is barred — a doctrinal claim about saint-presence, not folk superstition.
  • mārikāḥ — untimely deaths, epidemics
    From mṛ (to die). Bhāgavata's term for sudden / pestilential death. Pairs with upatāpa as the second mark of bhakta-absence — the elders use the precise pair that Bhāgavata diagnostics employ.
Wherever his equally powerful son Akrūra stays, Lord Indra will provide sufficient rain. Indeed, that place will be free of miseries and untimely deaths.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Wherever his equally powerful son Akrūra stays, Lord Indra will provide sufficient rain. Indeed, that place will be free of miseries and untimely deaths.
Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Wherever that (asau) son who had his powers (tat-prabhāvaḥ), famous for acts to benefit the whole world, is present, in those places Indra showers rain everywhere.

Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Nishkama Karma (Selfless Action)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Related verses
Concepts
Bhava
Wherever his equally powerful son Akrūra stays, Indra provides sufficient rain — free of miseries and untimely deaths. The 'rain effect' is heritable; particular devotee presences carry their own meteorology.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you under-recognize devotees whose presence brings weather?
  • Whose presence in your community produces 'rain' you take for granted?

The elders generalize from the father to the son: wherever Akrūra goes, the rains will follow. Gauḍīyas read this as a beautiful, partially-true claim — true about the prabhāva of a bhakta, partially blind to the fact that the prabhāva is borrowed from Kṛṣṇa, who is right there in their own city.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.34

↗
इति वृद्धवच: श्रुत्वा नैतावदिह कारणम् । इति मत्वा समानाय्य प्राहाक्रूरं जनार्दन: ॥ ३४ ॥
iti vṛddha-vacaḥ śrutvā
[iti vriddha-vachah shrutvaa]
naitāvad iha kāraṇam
[naitaavad iha kaaranam]
iti matvā samānāyya
[iti matvaa samaanaayya]
prāhākrūraṁ janārdanaḥ
[praahaakrooram janaardanah]
iti — thus vṛddha — of the elders vacaḥ — the words śrutvā — having heard na — not etāvat — only this iha — of the matter at hand kāraṇam — the cause iti — thus matvā — thinking samānāyya — having him brought back prāha — said akrūram — to Akrūra janārdanaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti vṛddha-vacaḥ śrutvā
iti
thus
vṛddha
of the elders
vacaḥ
the words
śrutvā
having heard
naitāvad iha kāraṇam
na
not
etāvat
only this
iha
of the matter at hand
kāraṇam
the cause
iti matvā samānāyya
iti
thus
matvā
thinking
samānāyya
having him brought back
prāhākrūraṁ janārdanaḥ
prāha
said
akrūram
to Akrūra
janārdanaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa .
  • vṛddha - vacaḥ — the words of the elders
    Compound: vṛddha (elder, aged) + vacas (word). Bhāgavata models a culture in which the words of vṛddhas are heard even when incomplete. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān does not despise partial truth from senior bhaktas; He works with it.
  • na etāvat — not only this
    Negative + 'so much.' Kṛṣṇa's internal qualification — yes, Akrūra's absence is a cause, but not the only cause. Gauḍīyas read this as the model of right discrimination: accept what is true in the elders' counsel, reserve the rest.
  • samānāyya — having had him brought back
    Gerund of sam-ā-√nī (to bring together / fetch). The act of summoning. The verse uses a single gerund to compress the entire administrative work of recalling an exile — Bhāgavata's economy.
  • janārdanaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa, agitator of the impious
    From jana (people) + ardana (agitator / one who afflicts). Specifically the name used when Bhagavān addresses pāpa. Gauḍīyas note its appearance here: as Kṛṣṇa is about to confront Akrūra over the jewel, Śuka selects the name that fits the moment.
Hearing these words from the elders, Lord Janārdana, though aware that the absence of Akrūra was not the only cause of the evil omens, had him summoned back to Dvārakā and spoke to him.

Since Lord Kṛṣṇa is the supreme controller, it was obviously by His will that certain troubles appeared in the city of Dvārakā. Superficially these evils may have been caused by Akrūra’s absence, and also by the absence of the auspicious Syamantaka jewel. But we should recall that Dvārakā is the eternal abode of Lord Kṛṣṇa; it is a city of divine bliss because the Lord resides there. Still, to execute His pastimes as a prince of this world, Lord Kṛṣṇa did the needful and summoned Akrūra.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hearing these words from the elders, Lord Janārdana, though aware that the absence of Akrūra was not the only cause of the evil omens, had him summoned back to Dvārakā and spoke to him.
Commentary

Hearing the words of the elders to bring back Akrura, though not believing that his absence was the cause of calamity, and by his own desire, he brought Akrura to Dvaraka.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa heard the words of the elders and then along with them concluded (iti matvā) that this was not the only cause of the calamities. Or, since he had caused the calamities as a pretext for bringing back Akrūra, he accepted their words and nothing else. The above verses describe what they said. But he thought to himself “Akrūrā’s absence is not the cause of the disasters. The cause is my will to provide a pretext for bringing him.” He then called him back with great respect (sam-ānāya). Kṛṣṇa called all the Yādavas and brought him by cart. Samānāyya has a causative meaning (had him brought).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He then called him back with great respect (sam-ānāya) to the assembly. Another version has samāhūya. The Lord who is always requested by the devotees so they can see him or who appears because of their prayers (janārdanaḥ) called him. This means that Akrūra also was eager to see the Lord. The Lord spoke to him with joy (prāha) because Akrūra did not have inner duplicity. That is revealed later.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Janārdana, though aware that Akrūra's absence isn't the only cause, has him summoned back. The Lord engages with proposed explanations even when He knows more; engaging community theology is part of leadership.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you bypass community theology because you know better?
  • How does engagement with partly-right ideas still serve the whole?

Kṛṣṇa hears the elders' theory, smiles inwardly at its half-truth, and yet uses it — calling Akrūra back because the deeper plan (recovering the jewel) needs him present. Gauḍīyas read this as the Bhagavān's gentle pedagogy: He acts on partial human wisdom as if it were the whole reason, while reserving the full reason to Himself.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.35-36

↗
पूजयित्वाभिभाष्यैनं कथयित्वा प्रिया: कथा: । विज्ञाताखिलचित्तज्ञ: स्मयमान उवाच ह ॥ ३५ ॥ ननु दानपते न्यस्तस्त्वय्यास्ते शतधन्वना । स्यमन्तको मनि: श्रीमान् विदित: पूर्वमेव न: ॥ ३६ ॥
pūjayitvābhibhāṣyainaṁ
[poojayitvaabhibhaashyainam]
kathayitvā priyāḥ kathāḥ
[kathayitvaa priyaah kathaah]
vijñātākhila-citta jñaḥ
[vijnaataakhila-chitta jnah]
smayamāna uvāca ha
[smayamaana uvaacha ha]
nanu dāna-pate nyastas
[nanu daana-pate nyastas]
tvayy āste śatadhanvanā
[tvayy aaste shatadhanvanaa]
syamantako maniḥ śrīmān
[syamantako manih shreemaan]
viditaḥ pūrvam eva naḥ
[viditah poorvam eva nah]
pūjayitvā — honoring abhibhāṣya — greeting enam — him (Akrūra) kathayitvā — discussing priyāḥ — pleasant kathāḥ — topics vijñāta — fully aware akhila — of everything citta — (Akrūra’s) heart jñaḥ — knowing smayamānaḥ — smiling uvāca ha — He said nanu — surely dāna — of charity pate — O master nyastaḥ — kept tvayi — in your care āste — is present śatadhanvanā — by Śatadhanvā syamantakaḥ. maniḥ — the Syamantaka jewel śrī - mān — opulent viditaḥ — known pūrvam — beforehand eva — indeed naḥ — by Us .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pūjayitvābhibhāṣyainaṁ
pūjayitvā
honoring
abhibhāṣya
greeting
kathayitvā priyāḥ kathāḥ
vijñātākhila-citta jñaḥ
smayamāna uvāca ha
nanu dāna-pate nyastas
enam
him (Akrūra)
kathayitvā
discussing
priyāḥ
pleasant
kathāḥ
topics
tvayy āste śatadhanvanā
syamantako maniḥ śrīmān
viditaḥ pūrvam eva naḥ
vijñāta
fully aware
akhila
of everything
citta
(Akrūra’s) heart
jñaḥ
knowing
smayamānaḥ
smiling
uvāca ha
He said
nanu
surely
dāna
of charity
pate
O master
nyastaḥ
kept
tvayi
in your care
āste
is present
śatadhanvanā
by Śatadhanvā
syamantakaḥ. maniḥ
the Syamantaka jewel
śrī - mān
opulent
viditaḥ
known
pūrvam
beforehand
eva
indeed
naḥ
by Us .
  • vijñāta - akhila - citta — fully aware of (his) entire heart
    Compound: vi-jñāta (fully known) + akhila (entire) + citta (heart, mind). The chapter began with vijñāta (verse 1) — Bhagavān aware of the Pāṇḍavas' rescue. It returns to vijñāta now — Bhagavān aware of Akrūra's secret. The frame closes.
  • smayamānaḥ — smiling
    Present participle of √smi. The Bhāgavata's tell for Bhagavān-about-to-reveal. Gauḍīyas treat the smile as one of Kṛṣṇa's signatures: He never confronts without the smile of one who already loves the confronted.
  • dāna - pate — O master of charity
    Vocative compound: dāna (charity) + pati (master). Akrūra was famed for his charity — Kṛṣṇa addresses him by his greatest virtue at the moment of confronting his concealment. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān names what is great in a devotee even while pointing to what is small.
  • nyastaḥ tvayi āste — is present, deposited with you
    Past participle + present verb. The Bhāgavata's quiet syntactic exposure: 'it sits with you.' The very verb of trust-deposit from verse 18 now returns in Bhagavān's mouth. Gauḍīyas: the language of Akrūra's complicity is his own.
  • viditaḥ pūrvam eva naḥ — known to Us beforehand indeed
    Past participle + adverb + plural pronoun. Bhagavān's mild claim: We knew. The verse closes on omniscience, gently. Gauḍīyas treat such admissions as Bhagavān's way of saving the devotee the longer humiliation of exposure-by-investigation.
Lord Kṛṣṇa honored Akrūra, greeted him confidentially and spoke pleasant words with him. Then the Lord, who was fully aware of Akrūra’s heart by virtue of His being the knower of everything, smiled and addressed him: “O master of charity, surely the opulent Syamantaka jewel was left in your care by Śatadhanvā and is still with you. Indeed, We have known this all along.

Lord Kṛṣṇa’s treatment of Akrūra here confirms that he is actually a great devotee of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Kṛṣṇa honored Akrūra, greeted him confidentially and spoke pleasant words with him. Then the Lord, who was fully aware of Akrūra's heart by virtue of His being the knower of everything, smiled and addressed him: "O master of charity, surely the opulent Syamantaka jewel was left in your care by Śatadhanvā and is still with you. Indeed, We have known this all along.
Commentary

Not only is Krsna , as paramatma, the knower of all atmas, but he is the knower of all paramatmas in everyones heart (vijnata akhila atma jna). Therefore what is so remarkable if he knows Akrura’s heart? Smiling, Krsna said, "You are not Satrajit’s enemy. You did not steal the jewel. You are not greedy for wealth. You are the greatest devotee. Do I not know your mind? I know even the paramatma in your mind. Why are you afraid of me? What can I ask you? I already know everything."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

What he said is now described. He spoke asking polite questions. He spoke dear topics (priya-kathāḥ) concerning the glories of devotion and devotees, how Akrūra had stayed near Vasudeva and others, worrying about their safety, and had then followed Kaṁsa’s orders, with the aim of having him killed, by coming to Vraja to see Kṛṣṇa and bringing Kṛṣṇa to Mathurā to kill Kaṁsa. He also spoke to Akrūra about the recent lamentable events. He spoke with joy (ha) while smiling with deep intention, to show that he knew Akrūra had the jewel. I know this jewel which gives wealth (śrīmān) or which shines is with you. Because of this, it cannot be hidden for long. It is not possible to hide it now also since I have known you have it from long before even before the death of Śatadhanvā. All of us know this.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

What he said is now described. He spoke asking polite questions. He spoke dear topics (priya-kathāḥ) concerning the glories of devotion and devotees. He spoke with joy (ha), comforting Akrūa so that he would give the jewel or happy that he had come. He smiled with deep intention, to show that he knew Akrūra had the jewel. His smile arose slightly because he spoke for Akrūra’s benefit, though he had arranged the events himself. Nanu indicates affection or certainty. O lord of wealth! This is uttered with respect. Or we understand the jewel is with you because of your piles of wealth. This will be clarified later. What has been left with me? Out of embarrassment, Kṛṣṇa does not mention the jewel in the beginning. By naming it Syamantaka, no other jewel is meant. Or is Syamantaka a person’s name? No, it is a gem (maniḥ). I know this jewel which gives wealth (śrīmān) or which shines is with you. Because of this, it cannot be hidden for long. It is not possible to hide it now also, since I have known you have it from long before the death of Śatadhanvā. All of us know this. Kṛṣṇa was skillful at covering his favoritism towards Akrūra.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Atma
Kṛṣṇa honors Akrūra, greets him confidentially, and — knowing his heart — smiles and speaks. The Lord engages even the complicit with warmth; smile and honor open the conversation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you greet the complicit coldly when warmth would unlock honesty?
  • How does Kṛṣṇa's smile model truth-telling without shaming?

Kṛṣṇa smiles before He speaks — the Bhāgavata's signature gesture for Bhagavān about to gently expose what He already knows. Honor first, sweet words second, smile third, the truth fourth. Gauḍīyas read this sequence as Kṛṣṇa's diplomatic vocabulary, taught to the cosmos through Akrūra.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.37

↗
सत्राजितोऽनपत्यत्वाद् गृह्णीयुर्दुहितु: सुता: । दायं निनीयाप: पिण्डान् विमुच्यर्णं च शेषितम् ॥ ३७ ॥
satrājito ’napatyatvād
[satraajito ’napatyatvaad]
gṛhṇīyur duhituḥ sutāḥ
[grihneeyur duhituh sutaah]
dāyaṁ ninīyāpaḥ piṇḍān
[daayam nineeyaapah pindaan]
vimucyarṇaṁ ca śeṣitam
[vimuchyarnam cha sheshitam]
satrājitaḥ — of Satrājit anapatyatvāt — because of not having sons gṛhṇīyuḥ — they should take duhituḥ — of his daughter sutāḥ — the sons dāyam — the inheritance ninīya — after presenting āpaḥ — water piṇḍān — and memorial offerings vimucya — after clearing ṛṇam — debts ca — and śeṣitam — remaining .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satrājito ’napatyatvād
satrājitaḥ
of Satrājit
gṛhṇīyur duhituḥ sutāḥ
dāyaṁ ninīyāpaḥ piṇḍān
anapatyatvāt
because of not having sons
gṛhṇīyuḥ
they should take
duhituḥ
of his daughter
sutāḥ
the sons
dāyam
the inheritance
ninīya
after presenting
āpaḥ
water
piṇḍān
and memorial offerings
vimucyarṇaṁ ca śeṣitam
vimucya
after clearing
ṛṇam
debts
ca
and
śeṣitam
remaining .
  • anapatyatvāt — because of the absence of sons
    From an-apatya (sonless) + -tva (-ness) + ablative. The dharmaśāstra trigger for the daughter's-sons rule of inheritance. Gauḍīyas note: Bhagavān cites the technical premise; He is not improvising.
  • dāyam — inheritance
    From √dā (to give). The technical term for inheritable wealth. Bhāgavata frequently shows Kṛṣṇa adjudicating dāya — His acts include the boring legal middle, not only the dramatic high points.
  • ninīya āpaḥ piṇḍān — after presenting water and piṇḍas
    Gerund of ni-√nī (to bring / lead) + āpaḥ (waters) + piṇḍa (rice-balls). The tarpaṇa and śrāddha rites. Gauḍīyas: bhakti does not abolish the pitṛ-yajña; it perfects the descendant's relationship to the ancestor by performing it as bhāgavata-dharma.
  • vimucya ṛṇam — after clearing the debt
    Gerund of vi-√muc (to release) + ṛṇa (debt). The debt — both literal financial debt and the threefold ṛṇa (to ṛṣis, devas, pitṛs). Gauḍīyas: bhakti to Bhagavān clears these debts but does not skip them; Kṛṣṇa here insists on the actual clearing.
“Since Satrājit had no sons, his daughter’s sons should receive his inheritance. They should pay for memorial offerings of water and piṇḍa, clear their grandfather’s outstanding debts and keep the remainder of the inheritance for themselves.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī quotes the following smṛti injunction regarding inheritance: patnī duhitaraś caiva pitaro bhrātaras tathā / tat-sutā gotra-jā bandhuḥ śiṣyāḥ sa-brahmacāriṇaḥ. “The inheritance goes first to the wife, then [if the wife has passed away] to the daughters, then to the parents, then to the brothers, then to the brothers’ sons, then to family members of the same gotra as the deceased, and then to his disciples, including brahmacārīs.” Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī adds that since Satrājit had no sons, since his wives were killed together with him, and since his daughter Satyabhāmā was not interested in the Syamantaka jewel, which constituted the inheritance, it rightfully belonged to her sons. In Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrīla Prabhupāda explains: “Lord Kṛṣṇa indicated by this statement that Satyabhāmā was already pregnant and that her son would be the real claimant of the jewel and would certainly take the jewel from Akrūra.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"Since Satrājit had no sons, his daughter's sons should receive his inheritance. They should pay for memorial offerings of water and piṇḍa, clear their grandfather's outstanding debts and keep the remainder of the inheritance for themselves.
Commentary

Since Satrajit died without a son, and his wives left their bodies along with him, and Satyabhama has no interest in the jewel, her sons are the rightful claimants of the jewel. Taking pinda and water, offering it to their grandfather and freeing themselves from debts, they should accept the jewel. Smrti scriptures say "The wife, daughter, parents, brothers, sons, friends of the same gotra and students or brahmacaris can be the claimants."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa now resolves the hostility between Akrūra and all others. Satrājit had no sons and no other daughter. Though scriptures say that in the absence of a son or wife, the daughter takes the inheritance rather than the daughter’s sons, here Kṛṣṇa says her sons should take the inheritance, not Satyabhāmā. It is understood that Satrājit’s wife died along with him (during the cremation).

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Since Satrājit had no sons, his daughter's sons should receive the inheritance — pay piṇḍa offerings, clear debts, keep the remainder. Practical inheritance rules are stated; spiritual law includes property law.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you avoid the practical/legal side of devotional life?
  • What inheritance arrangements are yours to handle properly?

Kṛṣṇa, while recovering the gem, also adjudicates the inheritance — daughter's sons take Satrājit's estate, but only after the piṇḍa and water-offerings and the clearing of debts. Gauḍīyas read this as Bhagavān doing the work of a dharma-sūtra: even in the middle of a political settlement, sacred duty is the first claim on inheritance.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.38-39

↗
तथापि दुर्धरस्त्वन्यैस्त्वय्यास्तां सुव्रते मणि: । किन्तु मामग्रज: सम्यङ्‍न प्रत्येति मणिं प्रति ॥ ३८ ॥ दर्शयस्व महाभाग बन्धूनां शान्तिमावह । अव्युच्छिन्ना मखास्तेऽद्य वर्तन्ते रुक्‍मवेदय: ॥ ३९ ॥
tathāpi durdharas tv anyais
[tathaapi durdharas tv anyais]
tvayy āstāṁ su-vrate maṇiḥ
[tvayy aastaam su-vrate manih]
kintu mām agrajaḥ samyaṅ
[kintu maam agrajah samyan]
na pratyeti maṇiṁ prati
[na pratyeti manim prati]
darśayasva mahā-bhāga
[darshayasva mahaa-bhaaga]
bandhūnāṁ śāntim āvaha
[bandhoonaam shaantim aavaha]
avyucchinnā makhās te ’dya
[avyuchchinnaa makhaas te ’dya]
vartante rukma-vedayaḥ
[vartante rukma-vedayah]
tathā api — nevertheless durdharaḥ — impossible to hold on to tu — but anyaiḥ — by others tvayi — with you āstām — should remain suvrate — O trustworthy keeper of vows maṇiḥ — the jewel kintu — only mam — Me agra - jaḥ — My elder brother samyak — completely na pratyeti — does not believe maṇim prati — concerning the jewel darśayasva — please show it mahā - bhāga — O most fortunate one bandhūnām — to My relatives śāntim — peace āvaha — bring avyucchinnāḥ — uninterrupted makhāḥ — sacrifices te — your adya — now vartante — are going on rukma — of gold vedayaḥ — whose altars .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tathāpi durdharas tv anyais
tathā api
nevertheless
durdharaḥ
impossible to hold on to
tvayy āstāṁ su-vrate maṇiḥ
kintu mām agrajaḥ samyaṅ
tu
but
anyaiḥ
by others
tvayi
with you
na pratyeti maṇiṁ prati
darśayasva mahā-bhāga
āstām
should remain
suvrate
O trustworthy keeper of vows
maṇiḥ
the jewel
kintu
only
bandhūnāṁ śāntim āvaha
mam
Me
agra - jaḥ
My elder brother
samyak
completely
avyucchinnā makhās te ’dya
na pratyeti
does not believe
maṇim prati
concerning the jewel
vartante rukma-vedayaḥ
darśayasva
please show it
mahā - bhāga
O most fortunate one
bandhūnām
to My relatives
śāntim
peace
āvaha
bring
avyucchinnāḥ
uninterrupted
makhāḥ
sacrifices
te
your
adya
now
vartante
are going on
rukma
of gold
vedayaḥ
whose altars .
  • durdharaḥ — impossible to hold on to
    Compound: dur- (hard) + dhara (holding). A gem that destroys ordinary holders — Prasena, Satrājit, Śatadhanvā all lost it. Kṛṣṇa concedes Akrūra is uniquely capable of holding it. Gauḍīyas: bhaktas hold what worldly men cannot.
  • suvrate — O trustworthy keeper of vows
    Vocative of suvrata — 'good in vows.' Kṛṣṇa addresses Akrūra by his bhakta-virtue even at the moment of asking him to show the proof of concealment. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān names the better self of a devotee while gently correcting the lesser.
  • na pratyeti — does not (fully) believe
    Negation + present of prati-√i (to come back / accept). Kṛṣṇa attributes the demand for proof to Balarāma's incomplete belief — a tactical move that lets Akrūra save face. Bhāgavata pedagogy: blame an internal kin-relation, not the offender, to extract the right action.
  • mahā - bhāga — O most fortunate one
    Vocative compound: mahā (great) + bhāga (share, fortune). The same epithet used of Akrūra in chapter 38. Gauḍīyas note: Kṛṣṇa restores the title even at the moment of the gentle exposure — the bhakta's standing is not erased by the slip.
  • rukma - vedayaḥ — whose altars are of gold
    Compound: rukma (gold) + vedi (sacrificial altar). The opulence of Akrūra's continual sacrifices is the indirect proof everyone has noticed. Bhāgavata closes the section with a wry observation: the gem's presence has been visible in the gold of the altars.
“Nevertheless, the jewel should remain in your care, O trustworthy Akrūra, because no one else can keep it safely. But please show the jewel just once, since My elder brother does not fully believe what I have told Him about it. In this way, O most fortunate one, you will pacify My relatives. [Everyone knows you have the jewel, for] you are now continually performing sacrifices on altars of gold.”

Although technically Satyabhāmā’s sons had a right to the jewel, Lord Kṛṣṇa decided to leave the jewel in the care of Akrūra, who was using the jewel’s wealth to continually perform religious sacrifices. Indeed, Akrūra’s ability to perform such rituals on altars of gold was an indication of the jewel’s potency.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
"Nevertheless, the jewel should remain in your care, O trustworthy Akrūra, because no one else can keep it safely. But please show the jewel just once, since My elder brother does not fully believe what I have told Him about it. In this way, O most fortunate one, you will pacify My relatives. [Everyone knows you have the jewel, for] you are now continually performing sacrifices on altars of gold."
Commentary

All the people of Dvaraka know the jewel is with you. The evidence is your constant performance of sacrifices in Kasi.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

You are worthy to keep the jewel because you are fixed in brahmacārya (suvrate). By keeping it, we will all derive the benefit of destruction of all calamities. Having announced the gem should be for everyone, Kṛṣṇa covered his desire to give it to Akrūra by his words, since Balarāma and others would wonder about that desire. Just show the jewel because Balarāma and others do not believe you have it. Suddenly Kṛṣṇa became insistent that he show the jewel. This was not Balarāma’s idea. In his mind Kṛṣṇa thought as follows. “Balarāma already said that Śatadhanvā must have left the jewel with someone else. He was hinting that it was Akrūra but did not say his name directly. It is known Śatadhanvā killed Satrājit but Akrūra was the one who gave bad advice to Śatadhanvā by saying that Satrājit had promised to give his daughter to him. Balarāma had anger towards Akrūra and affectionate anger towards me for not giving up favoritism to Akrūra. Because of this, he will not believe me at all if I say the jewel is not with me. Though we can infer from your charity and sacrifices that you have the jewel, Balarāma even doubts me, since he watched at a distance as I searched Śatadhanvā after killing him. Knowing my desires, he thinks that you gave me the jewel and then fled.” This is how Kṛṣṇa thought. In order to indicate that he was not terribly wicked since the jewel would be for others’ benefit, according to the first phrase used to describe Akrūra (suvrate), Kṛṣṇa says “O Akrūra, fortunate with devotion to me (mahābhāga), or having a portion of devotion to me!” You are not interested in the jewel. Showing the gem will completely pacify Balarāma and others, resolving the dissension arising from the jewel. Balarāma had been brought from Mithilā at this time. Hari-vaṁśa says: prasādya tu tato rāmo vṛṣṇy-andhaka-mahā-rathaiḥ / ānīto dvārakām eva kṛṣṇena ca mahātmanā // Satisfying Balarāma Kṛṣṇa had him brought to Dvārakā by great warriors of the Vṛṣṇis and Andhakas.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

You are worthy to keep the jewel because you are fixed in brahmacārya (suvrate) or because you are fixed in keeping your vow. The Lord had the desire from previously that Akrūra keep the jewel for the benefit of the people. Show it to Balarāma so he will believe that it is not with me. He thinks it is with me though by its function it is with you, my devotee. Though Balarāma did not think like this, Kṛṣṇa makes this statement so that Akrūra would give the jewel. It is understood that Balarāma had by that time returned from Mithilā. prasādya tu tato rāmo vṛṣṇy-andhaka-mahā-rathaiḥ / ānīto dvārakām eva kṛṣṇena ca mahātmanā // Satisfying Balarāma, Kṛṣṇa had him brought to Dvārakā by great warriors of the Vṛṣṇis and Andhakas. O Akrūra, fortunate with devotion to me (mahābhāga), or having a portion of devotion to me!” You are not interested in the jewel. Thus, just show the jewel but do not give it since it will remain with you only. Why? Showing the gem will completely pacify Balarāma and others, resolving the dissension arising from the jewel.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)
Related verses
Yet the jewel should remain in your care, Akrūra, because no one else can keep it safely; but please show it once, since My elder brother does not fully believe what I have told Him. The Lord honors safekeeping while requesting demonstration; multiple needs balanced.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could you let someone keep something while still asking to see it?
  • How do you balance trust and transparency in entrusted assets?

Kṛṣṇa lets Akrūra keep the jewel — only asks him to show it once, to settle Balarāma and the relatives. Bhagavān's mercy here is precisely-calibrated: He exposes the concealment but does not strip the concealer. Gauḍīyas read this as the doctrinal pattern of vaiṣṇava-aparādha-correction: name it, surface it, restore the devotee without stripping him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.40

↗
एवं सामभिरालब्ध: श्वफल्कतनयो मणिम् । आदाय वाससाच्छन्न: ददौ सूर्यसमप्रभम् ॥ ४० ॥
evaṁ sāmabhir ālabdhaḥ
[evam saamabhir aalabdhah]
śvaphalka-tanayo maṇim
[shvaphalka-tanayo manim]
ādāya vāsasācchannaḥ
[aadaaya vaasasaachchannah]
dadau sūrya-sama-prabham
[dadau soorya-sama-prabham]
evam — thus sāmabhiḥ — with conciliatory words ālabdhaḥ — reproached śvaphalka - tanayaḥ — the son of Śvaphalka maṇim — the Syamantaka jewel ādāya — taking vāsasā — in his garment ācchannaḥ — concealed dadau — he gave sūrya — to the sun sama — equal prabham — in effulgence .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ sāmabhir ālabdhaḥ
evam
thus
sāmabhiḥ
with conciliatory words
ālabdhaḥ
reproached
śvaphalka-tanayo maṇim
śvaphalka - tanayaḥ
the son of Śvaphalka
maṇim
the Syamantaka jewel
ādāya vāsasācchannaḥ
ādāya
taking
vāsasā
in his garment
ācchannaḥ
concealed
dadau sūrya-sama-prabham
dadau
he gave
sūrya
to the sun
sama
equal
prabham
in effulgence .
  • sāmabhiḥ ālabdhaḥ — addressed with conciliatory words
    Instrumental of sāman (the gentle / soothing approach, one of the four upāyas — sāma, dāna, bheda, daṇḍa) + past participle of ā-√labh. Kṛṣṇa uses sāman, not daṇḍa. Gauḍīyas treat this as the Bhāgavata's preferred upāya among bhaktas: gentle words first.
  • śvaphalka - tanayaḥ — the son of Śvaphalka
    Compound: Śvaphalka (his father) + tanaya (son). The verse calls Akrūra by his father's name at the moment of his recovery — a reminder of the lineage of bhakti he has come from and is returning to.
  • ācchannaḥ — concealed
    Past participle of ā-√chad. The word for the cloth concealment. Bhāgavata's word-economy: the very root that means 'to cover' is used both for the dharma-cloth and the chāyā of māyā. Gauḍīyas read the resonance: even devotees' concealments are uncovered by Bhagavān.
  • sūrya - sama - prabham — with effulgence equal to the sun
    Compound: sūrya (sun) + sama (equal) + prabhā (effulgence). The Syamantaka was described in chapter 56 as sun-like. Gauḍīyas note: the gem's prabhā cannot remain hidden — its very nature is to shine. Confession is the gem's restoration to its own quality.
Thus shamed by Lord Kṛṣṇa’s conciliatory words, the son of Śvaphalka brought out the jewel from where he had concealed it in his clothing and gave it to the Lord. The brilliant gem shone like the sun.

We can see in this chapter how a valuable jewel caused so much intrigue, violence and suffering. This is certainly a good lesson for those who desire a trouble-free spiritual life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus shamed by Lord Kṛṣṇa's conciliatory words, the son of Śvaphalka brought out the jewel from where he had concealed it in his clothing and gave it to the Lord. The brilliant gem shone like the sun.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Because he was the son of a great sage Śvaphalka, he became ashamed. He gave Kṛṣṇa the gem shining like the sun even when covered by his cloth.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Because he was the son of a sage, he was not interested in the jewel. He also understood the intentions of the Lord. He took the jewel covered by a cloth he wore or other cloth in his hands and gave it to Kṛṣṇa’s hands. Uncovered, it shone like the sun.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Shamed by Kṛṣṇa's conciliatory words, Akrūra brings out the jewel from his clothing and gives it to the Lord — it shines like the sun. Even the complicit are won by conciliatory speech; shame produces what threat would not.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could conciliation produce what threat has failed to extract?
  • How does shame yield what defiance withholds?

Akrūra brings the gem out from his garment — the same fold of cloth that had hidden it now becomes the platform of its revelation. Gauḍīyas read this as the structure of every confession: the cloth that conceals is itself the cloth in which the confessing offering is made.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.41

↗
स्यमन्तकं दर्शयित्वा ज्ञातिभ्यो रज आत्मन: । विमृज्य मणिना भूयस्तस्मै प्रत्यर्पयत् प्रभु: ॥ ४१ ॥
syamantakaṁ darśayitvā
[syamantakam darshayitvaa]
jñātibhyo raja ātmanaḥ
[jnaatibhyo raja aatmanah]
vimṛjya maṇinā bhūyas
[vimrijya maninaa bhooyas]
tasmai pratyarpayat prabhuḥ
[tasmai pratyarpayat prabhuh]
syamantakam — the Syamantaka jewel darśayitvā — after showing jñātibhyaḥ — to His relatives rajaḥ — the contamination ātmanaḥ — (falsely heaped upon) Himself vimṛjya — wiping away maṇinā — with the jewel bhūyaḥ — again tasmai — to him, Akrūra pratyarpayat — offered it back prabhuḥ — the Supreme Lord .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
syamantakaṁ darśayitvā
syamantakam
the Syamantaka jewel
darśayitvā
after showing
jñātibhyo raja ātmanaḥ
jñātibhyaḥ
to His relatives
rajaḥ
the contamination
ātmanaḥ
(falsely heaped upon) Himself
vimṛjya maṇinā bhūyas
vimṛjya
wiping away
maṇinā
with the jewel
bhūyaḥ
again
tasmai pratyarpayat prabhuḥ
tasmai
to him, Akrūra
pratyarpayat
offered it back
prabhuḥ
the Supreme Lord .
  • darśayitvā — having shown
    Causative gerund of √dṛś. The gem is 'shown' — the verb of darśana applied here to an object whose visibility settles a slander. Gauḍīyas: darśana clears doubt; the Bhāgavata applies the same epistemology to gems as to deities.
  • rajaḥ ātmanaḥ — the dust upon Himself
    Genitive: rajas (dust / contamination / passion) + ātman. The slander had cast 'dust' on Kṛṣṇa's name. Gauḍīyas treat rajas in this verse as a metaphor for unjust suspicion against Bhagavān — and note the play on rajo-guṇa in the background.
  • vimṛjya — wiping away
    Gerund of vi-√mṛj (to wipe clean). The gesture is precise — Bhagavān wipes His name with the very gem that had been used to soil it. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa's vindication uses the object of the accusation as its own answer.
  • pratyarpayat — He returned, gave back
    Imperfect of prati-ā-√ṛ. Bhagavān gives the gem back to Akrūra. The arc closes: He did not want the jewel; He wanted the rumor erased and the devotee restored. Gauḍīyas: Kṛṣṇa's interest in wealth is always instrumental, never possessive.
After the almighty Lord had shown the Syamantaka jewel to His relatives, thus dispelling the false accusations against Him, He returned it to Akrūra.

For the second time, doubts about the Lord’s reputation occasioned by the Syamantaka jewel are dispelled by the jewel itself. Indeed, for the second time the Lord brought the jewel to Dvārakā to establish His integrity there. This amazing series of incidents demonstrates that even when Lord Kṛṣṇa descends to this world there is a tendency for His “peers” to criticize Him. The whole material world is infected by the faultfinding propensity, and in this chapter the Supreme Lord demonstrates the nature of this undesirable quality.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After the almighty Lord had shown the Syamantaka jewel to His relatives, thus dispelling the false accusations against Him, He returned it to Akrūra.
Commentary

Being scolded gently by Krsna, Akrura took the jewel and gave it to Krsna. Touching it with his hand, Krsna returned it to Akrura.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He showed the jewel to the Yādavas and cleared the accusations (rajaḥ) created by the jewel. Kṛṣṇa thought, “Akrūra concealed the jewel by his will, not mine. Because he has a little qualification, I will offer it to him”. He did this because he was the protector of his devotees. He did this for the benefit of the Yadu dynasty. Or, because he was the Lord, it was the proper action to teach the population. Akrūra placed the jewel around his neck and went away. Hari-vaṁśa says: sa kṛṣṇa-hastāt saṁprāpya maṇi-ratnaṁ syamantakam / ābadhya gāndinī-putro virarājāṁśumān iva // Taking the gem from Kṛṣṇa’s hand Akrūra put it on his neck and shone like the sun.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He showed the jewel to the Yādavas and cleared the accusations (rajaḥ) created by the jewel. Because he was the Lord, it was the proper action to teach the population. Akrūra placed the jewel around his neck and went away. Hari-vaṁśa says: sa kṛṣṇa-hastāt saṁprāpya maṇi-ratnaṁ syamantakam / ābadhya gāndinī-putro virarājāṁśumān iva // Taking the gem from Kṛṣṇa’s hand, Akrūra put it on his neck and it shone like the sun. In order to show the uselessness of wealth, not only with the Lord but with the best devotees who act for the benefit of the people, Satrājit and others acted in this way. Otherwise the Yadus would not have acted in this way. Thus the killing of Satrājit was illusory. The conclusion is discussed in Bhāgavatāmṛta.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Svadhyaya (Self-study & Scripture Study)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
After showing the jewel to His relatives, dispelling false accusations, the Lord returns it to Akrūra. The Lord's reputation matters enough to display the evidence; ownership matters enough to return it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you fail to display evidence that would clear your name with relatives?
  • How do you balance reputation-care and non-grasping in single acts?

Kṛṣṇa shows the gem to the relatives and then gives it back. The whole arc — pursuit, killing, search, exile, recall, exposure — was driven by the need to wipe the dust off His own name. Gauḍīyas read this as one of the Bhāgavata's clearest demonstrations: Bhagavān will move armies and oceans to clear the reputation of His own innocence, less for His sake than for the devotees who depend on it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.57.42

↗
यस्त्वेतद् भगवत ईश्वरस्य विष्णो- र्वीर्याढ्यं वृजिनहरं सुमङ्गलं च । आख्यानं पठति श‍ृणोत्यनुस्मरेद् वा दुष्कीर्तिं दुरितमपोह्य याति शान्तिम् ॥ ४२ ॥
yas tv etad bhagavata īśvarasya viṣṇor
[yas tv etad bhagavata eeshvarasya vishnor]
vīryāḍhyaṁ vṛjina-haraṁ su-maṅgalaṁ ca
[veeryaadhyam vrijina-haram su-mangalam cha]
ākhyānaṁ paṭhati śṛṇoty anusmared vā
[aakhyaanam pathati shrinoty anusmared vaa]
duṣkīrtiṁ duritam apohya yāti śāntim
[dushkeertim duritam apohya yaati shaantim]
yaḥ — whoever tu — indeed etat — this bhagavataḥ — of the Personality of Godhead īśvarasya — the supreme controller viṣṇoḥ — Lord Viṣṇu vīrya — with the prowess āḍhyam — which is rich vṛjina — sinful reactions haram — which removes su - maṅgalam — most auspicious ca — and ākhyānam — narration paṭhati — recites śṛṇoti — hears anusmaret — remembers vā — or duṣkīrtim — bad reputation duritam — and sins apohya — driving away yāti — he attains śāntim — peace .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yas tv etad bhagavata īśvarasya viṣṇor
yaḥ
whoever
tu
indeed
etat
this
bhagavataḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
īśvarasya
the supreme controller
viṣṇoḥ
Lord Viṣṇu
vīryāḍhyaṁ vṛjina-haraṁ su-maṅgalaṁ ca
vīrya
with the prowess
āḍhyam
which is rich
vṛjina
sinful reactions
haram
which removes
su - maṅgalam
most auspicious
ca
and
ākhyānaṁ paṭhati śṛṇoty anusmared vā
ākhyānam
narration
paṭhati
recites
śṛṇoti
hears
anusmaret
remembers
vā
or
duṣkīrtiṁ duritam apohya yāti śāntim
duṣkīrtim
bad reputation
duritam
and sins
apohya
driving away
yāti
he attains
śāntim
peace .
  • vīrya - āḍhyam — rich with prowess
    Compound: vīrya (prowess, potency) + āḍhya (rich, endowed). The Bhāgavata names what the narration is rich in — not theology in the abstract but Kṛṣṇa's particular vīrya. Gauḍīyas: vīrya is one of the six aiśvaryas of Bhagavān; the chapter foregrounds it.
  • vṛjina - haram — which removes sinful reactions
    Compound: vṛjina (sin, twist, crookedness) + hara (remover). The technical claim of phala-śruti: this kathā is itself an instrument of papa-haraṇa. Gauḍīyas: śravaṇa and kīrtana have power independent of the hearer's intention.
  • paṭhati śṛṇoti anusmaret — recites, hears, or remembers
    Three verbs of bhakti's first limbs: paṭhana (reciting), śravaṇa (hearing), smaraṇa (remembering). Gauḍīyas: three of the nine aṅgas of bhakti named in one breath as the means of access to the gain promised.
  • duṣkīrtim duritam — bad reputation and sins
    Compound: duṣ-kīrti (bad fame) + durita (evil deed). Two specific evils — and Gauḍīyas note the order: bad reputation first, sins second. The chapter has been about Kṛṣṇa's own reputation; the phala-śruti promises the same protection to His hearers.
  • śāntim — peace
    From √śam. The Bhāgavata's final word of the chapter — śānti. Gauḍīyas: śānti in the Vaiṣṇava frame is not cessation but the settled bhāva that comes from contact with kṛṣṇa-kathā. The whole tumultuous chapter resolves into one word.
This narration, rich with descriptions of the prowess of Lord Śrī Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, removes sinful reactions and bestows all auspiciousness. Anyone who recites, hears or remembers it will drive away his own infamy and sins and attain peace.

Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Fifty-seventh Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Satrājit Murdered, the Jewel Returned.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This narration, rich with descriptions of the prowess of Lord Śrī Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, removes sinful reactions and bestows all auspiciousness. Anyone who recites, hears or remembers it will drive away his own infamy and sins and attain peace.
Commentary

Anyone who hears this story will have his bad reputation ,and its root, sin (duritam), removed.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

All the pastimes of the Lord, filled with excitement, are never under control of anything else. The Lord is full of all powers as Kṛṣṇa (bhagavataḥ), able to do everything (īśvarasya), and spreads everywhere by his powers (viṣṇoh). One who recites, hears or remembers after hearing (anu) or even without reciting or hearing simply remembers this story of Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, capable of doing everything and spreading everywhere, stories filled with astonishing actions (vīrya), which destroy the suffering of saṁsāra, and create the highest auspiciousness by increasing bhakti to the Lord, drives away all infamy and attained happiness of the heart (śāntim) or steadiness in thinking of Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

This pastime of the Lord, with clearing the false rumors about the Lord, by some method heard, destroys all inauspiciousness and produces all auspiciousness. The word tu indicates a different topic or is an ornament of speech. The Lord is full of all powers as Kṛṣṇa (bhagavataḥ), able to do everything (īśvarasya), and spreads everywhere by his powers (viṣṇoh). One who recites, hears or remembers after hearing (anu) or even without reciting or hearing simply remembers this story of Bhagavān Kṛṣṇa, capable of doing everything and spreading everywhere, stories filled with astonishing actions (vīrya), which destroy the suffering of saṁsāra, and create the highest auspiciousness by increasing bhakti to the Lord, drives away all infamy and attains happiness of the heart (śāntim) or steadiness in thinking of Kṛṣṇa. Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Fifty-seventh Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled 'Satrājit Murdered, the Jewel Returned." 10.58: Kṛṣṇa Marries Five Princesses verses: Summary, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13-14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50-51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 Chapter Summary This chapter describes how Lord Kṛṣṇa married five brides, beginning with Kālindī, and went to Indraprastha to visit the Pāṇḍavas. After the Pāṇḍavas had completed their incognito exile, Lord Kṛṣṇa went with Sātyaki and other Yadus to see them in Indraprastha. The Pāṇḍavas greeted the Lord and embraced Him in great ecstasy. Their new bride, Draupadī, shyly approached Kṛṣṇa and bowed down to Him. Then the Pāṇḍavas properly worshiped and welcomed Sātyaki and the Lord's other companions, offering them sitting places. Lord Kṛṣṇa paid a visit to Queen Kuntī, and after He had offered her His respects, they inquired from each other about their family members. As Kuntī-devi recalled the various miseries Duryodhana had inflicted upon her and her sons, she remarked that Kṛṣṇa was their only protector. "You are the well-wisher of the entire universe," she said, "yet even though You are free from all delusion of 'mine' and 'another's,' You nonetheless reside within the hearts of those who meditate on You constantly, and from within their hearts You destroy all their miseries." Then Yudhiṣṭhira told Kṛṣṇa, "Only because we executed many pious acts are we able to see Your lotus feet, which even great yogīs find it impossible to attain." Honored by King Yudhiṣṭhira, Śrī Kṛṣṇa happily remained as a guest in Indraprastha for several months. One day, Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna went hunting in the forest. While bathing in the Yamunā River, they saw a charming young maiden. On Kṛṣṇa's request Arjuna went up to the girl and asked who she was. The beautiful maiden replied, "I am Kālindī, the daughter of the sun-god. Hoping to attain Lord Viṣṇu as my husband, I have been performing severe austerities. I will accept no one else as my husband, and until He marries me I will remain in the Yamunā, living in a house my father built for me here." After Arjuna reported all this to Kṛṣṇa, the omniscient Lord took Kālindī onto His chariot, and then the three of them returned to Yudhiṣṭhira's residence. Later the Pāṇḍavas requested Kṛṣṇa to build them a city, and He did so by having Viśvakarmā, the architect of the demigods, construct one that was extremely attractive. The Lord satisfied His beloved devotees by remaining with them there for some time. Then, to please Agni, the fire-god, Kṛṣṇa arranged to offer him the Khāṇḍava forest. The Lord asked Arjuna to burn down the forest and accompanied him as his charioteer. Agni was so satisfied with the offering that he presented Arjuna with the Gāṇḍīva bow, a team of horses, a chariot, two inexhaustible quivers, and armor. While the Khāṇḍava forest burned, Arjuna saved a demon named Maya from the blaze. Maya Dānava reciprocated by building Arjuna a splendid palace. In this building Duryodhana would later get a good drenching after mistaking the surface of a pond for a solid floor, thus embarrassing himself. Next Lord Kṛṣṇa took permission from Arjuna and His other relatives and went back to Dvārakā with His entourage. There He married Kālindī. Some time later He went to Avantīpura, where, in the presence of manv kings, He abducted the King of Avantī's sister, Mitravindā, who was very much attracted to Him. In the kingdom of Ayodhyā lived a devout king named Nagnajit. He had an extraordinarily beautiful, marriageable daughter named Satyā, or Nāgnajitī. The girl's relatives had laid down the stipulation that any man who could subdue a certain group of seven ferocious bulls would win her hand. When Kṛṣṇa heard about this princess, He went to Ayodhyā with a large contingent of soldiers. King Nagnajit greeted Him hospitably and joyfully worshiped Him with various offerings. When Satyā saw Kṛṣṇa, she immediately desired Him as her husband, and King Nagnajit, understanding his daughter's intentions, informed Lord Kṛṣṇa of his own wish that the Lord and his daughter be married. The King affectionately told the Lord, "You alone would be a suitable husband for my daughter, and if You subdue the seven bulls You may certainly marry her." Lord Kṛṣṇa then manifested Himself in seven separate forms and subdued the seven bulls. King Nagnajit duly presented his daughter to the Lord, together with a dowry of abundant gifts, and the Lord took Satyā onto His chariot for the journey back to Dvārakā. Just then the rival kings who had been defeated by the bulls tried to attack Lord Kṛṣṇa. But Arjuna easily beat them back, and Kṛṣṇa proceeded with Nāgnajitī to Dvārakā. Subsequently Śrī Kṛṣṇa married Bhadrā after abducting her from her svayaṁ-vara ceremony, and He also married Lakṣmaṇā, the royal daughter of the King of Madra.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Ishvara
This narration, rich with descriptions of Viṣṇu's prowess, removes sinful reactions and bestows all auspiciousness — anyone reciting, hearing or remembering it will drive away their adversity. The story itself is an act of worship with effects.
Reflection Questions
  • Which narration of the Lord could become your daily 'adversity-driver'?
  • Where could you upgrade reading from information to ritual?

The chapter ends with phala-śruti — whoever recites, hears, or remembers this narration of Bhagavān's vīrya has his infamy and sins driven away. Gauḍīyas treat phala-śruti not as bribe but as the Bhāgavata's truth-claim: katha about Kṛṣṇa is itself purifying contact, the same as darśana of His form.

📝 My note