FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

7.12 · The Perfect Society: Four Spiritual Classes

27 verses · 🖨 Class prep
N Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (12365 chars)

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Narada instructed Maharaja Yuddhistira about the foundational qualities of a civilised human being and the ingenious system of Varnasrama. For most conditioned souls, a gradual, step-by-step progression towards pure devotional service is required. The itinerant sage thus described the various social orders and occupations of life. Everyone should identify their natural position, honour their responsibilities, make a beneficial contribution to society, and ultimately draw closer to God as a result.

Previous Utilising Time Next Civilised Humans Last updated 1 year ago

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15)

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Narada instructed Maharaja Yuddhistira about the foundational qualities of a civilised human being and the ingenious system of Varnasrama. For most conditioned souls, a gradual, step-by-step progression towards pure devotional service is required. The itinerant sage thus described the various social orders and occupations of life. Everyone should identify their natural position, honour their responsibilities, make a beneficial contribution to society, and ultimately draw closer to God as a result.

Previous Utilising Time Next Civilised Humans Last updated 1 year ago

Brahmacarya / Vanaprastha

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Brahmacarya / Vanaprastha Chapter 12 Narada described the characteristics of brahmacaris . The essential principles are to live under the care of a guru, engage in scriptural study, minimise bodily necessities, survive by begging, control the mind and senses, and avoid association with women. After completing his training, the student can enter into family life or continue on the path of renunciation. Narada next described the lifestyle of vanaprasthas , who should adopt simplicity in bodily habits, live in the forest or travel to holy places, and engage in austerities which deepen their sense of detachment. Step-by-step, the vanaprasthas should give up material conceptions, especially the deep-rooted psychology that “I am this body, and everything connected with this body is mine.”

Previous Civilised Humans Next Sannyasa Last updated 1 year ago

Civilised Humans

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Civilised Humans Chapter 11 Having heard about the exalted character of Prahlada, Maharaja Yuddhistira enquired about the gradual development towards such purity through adherence to the system of Varnasrama. Thus, Narada Muni described this system which the Lord Himself creates. He began by outlining a list of thirty preliminary qualities that are expected of any civilised human being. Those who possess such character are fit candidates to participate in the system of Varnasrama, otherwise they will invariably cause a disturbance to society. He went on to describe the divisions of brahmana , ksatriya , vaisya and sudra . Each have specific qualities and strengths, and adhere to certain principles, though they may adjust the details of their activities according to time, place and circumstance. A crucial point to note is that one’s position is determined by their character and qualities, and not birth. Narada then delineated the temperament and activities of a chaste wife.

Previous N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Next Brahmacarya / Vanaprastha Last updated 1 year ago

Finding Dharma

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Finding Dharma “Generally society is divided into brahmanas, ksatriyas, vasiyas, sudras, brahmacaris, vanaprasthas, sannyasis and grhasthas. Everyone must act according to his position and try to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for that will make one’s life successful. This was instructed in Naimisaranya: “O best among the twice-born, it is therefore concluded that the highest perfection one can achieve, by discharging his prescribed duties [dharma] according to caste divisions and order of life, is to please the Lord Hari.” (SB 1.2.13) Everyone should act according to his occupational duties just to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Then everyone will be happy.” (SB 7.15.66) There are two verses which Krishna repeats twice, practically verbatim, in the Bhagavad-gita. Firstly, Krishna reminds Arjuna of the need to embrace one’s material duties: “It is far better to discharge one’s prescribed duties, even though faultily, than another’s duties perfectly. Destruction in the course of performing one’s own duty is better than engaging in another’s duties, for to follow another’s path is dangerous.” (BG 3.35). Further, Krishna tells Arjuna of the ultimate duty: “Engage your mind always in thinking of Me, become My devotee, offer obeisances to Me and worship Me. Being completely absorbed in Me, surely you will come to Me.” (BG 9.34) These two verses relate to the absolute necessity of embracing sva-dharma , or worldy duty in this life, and simultaneously perfecting sanatana-dharma , or ultimate duty in spiritual life. In order to fulfil these purposes and navigate the material world, Narada Muni also described manusya-dharma (qualities of civilised beings) which forms the foundation of a successful life.

Find your Dharma

In recent times, a common theme has repeatedly surfaced in the modern world: the need to find your purpose, your nature, your contribution and calling. This is not a new message, since the sages of yore repeatedly addressed this. Here’s an exercise: grab a piece of paper, pick up a pen, and quickly scribble down your name using your non-writing hand. Unless you’re ambidextrous, the experience is usually common to all – it’s slow and tiring, requires excessive effort and attention, feels uncomfortable and abnormal, and usually concludes in a lousylooking attempt. These are some of the feelings we experience when we operate outside of our dharma (nature, or unique function in life).

We live in a noisy world, and, in the midst of it, struggle to hear the heart. Tuning into our inner calling, however, is where the real journey begins, otherwise we may well be careering down a no-through road. Happy and fulfilled people utilise wisdom and guidance to accurately understand what makes them tick. It’s a simple but neglected principle of life.

Live your Dharma

The problem can, however, go beyond this. Just as difficult as finding your dharma , is to wholeheartedly live your dharma . Even when we know what we are ‘hard-wired’ for, too many things deviate us from the path we should be treading. The expectations of others, the desire for praise and accolade, the restlessness and intrigue of trying new things, and the perpetual illusion that the grass is greener on the other side, are all factors which lure us towards the unnatural, and set us up for disappointment and failure. Honest living is about doing what you are truly meant for, however big or small, in whatever field or arena, regardless of pressure and public opinion. Everyone, without exception, has something unique to bring to the table. We only have to find it and feed it.

Beyond your Dharma

Dharmic living doesn’t mean boring or average living, or avoidance of challenge and risk. In fact, it’s quite the opposite – to capitalise on strengths, cover our weaknesses, develop naturally, and focus all energy in a way which yields maximum impact. In the name of dharma we should not become lazy or lethargic – it’s meant to be a life which dynamically bends you without breaking you. Dharmic living also incorporates the willingness, flexibility and readiness to sometimes act outside of our dharma . The spirit of sacrifice is at the heart of character development. In fact, being strongly situated in our dharma should render us more capable and equipped to respond to the unpredictable needs of the day. Following your dharma should not be an excuse to circumvent the essential mood of being a flexible, selfless servant.

Previous Narada's History Next Self Discovery Last updated 1 year ago

Self Discovery

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Finding Dharma Self Discovery As mentioned, the journey of self-discovery, on a material and spiritual level, is not easy in today’s day and age. With regards to finding your sva-dharma , here are some useful tips: Analyse – reflect on your qualities and character, and conduct a personality test. Try to identify those things you are good at, and those things you are attracted to. The overlap between those two lists indicate integral parts of your dharma . Ask – draw upon the advice of friends, mentors and coaches. We can’t always analyse ourselves in an objective way, but neutral (and informed) observers can offer greater clarity. Attempt – try different things, experiment and don’t be afraid to fail. Even when we attempt something and find it’s completely unsuitable, it helps us to decipher what may well be suitable. We should embrace the growth and wisdom that comes with failure.

Previous Finding Dharma Next G.O.L.D Last updated 1 year ago

Grhasta

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Grhasta Chapter 14 Narada then described the occupational duties of the householder according to the time, the country and the performer. Essential activities include associating with saintly persons, absorption in hearing and chanting, simplicity in lifestyle, protection of other members of society, honouring ritualistic observances, offering charity, going on pilgrimage and spreading Krishna consciousness.

Previous Sannyasa Next Levels of Brahmanas Last updated 1 year ago

Levels of Brahmanas

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Levels of Brahmanas Chapter 15 Narada went on to discuss the refined qualities of civilised people which include non-violence, satisfaction and simplicity. He expertly presented how one can overcome negative qualities by incorporating higher principles into their life. When each asrama lives by such principles and strictly adheres to their respective duties, there is smooth social cohesion and substantial spiritual advancement. Having established the importance of the priestly class in society, Narada expanded on the various levels of brahmana . Some are attached to fruitive activities for social betterment (mostly grhastas ), others are attracted to austerities and penances (mostly vanaprasthas ), yet others are interested in studying the Vedas and teaching them (mostly brahmacaris ), and the remaining are engaged in yoga systems like bhakti and jnana (mostly sannyasis ).

Previous Grhasta Next Narada's History Last updated 1 year ago

Narada's History

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Narada's History Chapter 15 Narada concluded his instructions to Maharaja Yuddhistira by recounting his own history. Previously, he was a Gandharva named Upabarhana. When he made the mistake of glorifying the demigods in a festival for the Supreme Lord, he was cursed to be reborn as the son of a maidservant. In that life, however, he served the exalted devotees, and subsequently became Narada, the son of Lord Brahma. Such is the spiritual mercy that pure Vaisnavas can bestow upon someone. Having described various descendants of the daughters of Daksa, Sukadeva Goswami thus concluded Canto Seven of Srimad-Bhagavatam.

Previous Levels of Brahmanas Next Finding Dharma Last updated 1 year ago

Sannyasa

N - Narada's Instructions (11-15) Sannyasa Chapter 13 Narada outlined the qualities of a sannyasi . Essential elements include simple living, travelling, begging, not drawing attention to oneself, becoming socially unentangled, peaceful, equipoised and absorbed in Krishna. In this regard, Narada described the life of a saintly mendicant who remained aloof from society (avadhuta paramahamsa) and displayed symptoms of deep renunciation and detachment. Once, when questioned by Prahlada, the avadhuta explained his life story. After experiencing the false promises of material life and the emptiness of sense enjoyment, which always leads to frustration, the avadhuta turned away from such activities. He adopted the livelihood of a python (ajagara-vrtti) , which stays in one place and eats only those things which come of their own accord. In this way, he offered many enlightening insights on the nature of the world and where our true happiness is to be found.

Previous Brahmacarya / Vanaprastha Next Grhasta Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.1

↗
श्रीनारद उवाच ब्रह्मचारी गुरुकुले वसन्दान्तो गुरोर्हितम् । आचरन्दासवन्नीचो गुरौ सुद‍ृढसौहृद: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-nārada uvāca
[shree-naarada uvaacha]
brahmacārī gurukule
[brahmachaaree gurukule]
vasan dānto guror hitam
[vasan daanto guror hitam]
ācaran dāsavan nīco
[aacharan daasavan neecho]
gurau sudṛḍha-sauhṛdaḥ
[gurau sudridha-sauhridah]
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca — Śrī Nārada Muni said brahmacārī — a brahmacārī, a student living at the residence of the guru gurukule — at the residence of the guru vasan — by living dāntaḥ — continuously practicing control of the senses guroḥ hitam — only for the benefit of the guru (not for one’s personal benefit) ācaran — practicing dāsa-vat — very humbly, like a slave nīcaḥ — submissive, obedient gurau — unto the spiritual master su-dṛḍha — firmly sauhṛdaḥ — in friendship or good will.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-nārada uvāca
śrī-nāradaḥ uvāca
Śrī Nārada Muni said
brahmacārī gurukule
brahmacārī
a brahmacārī, a student living at the residence of the guru
gurukule
at the residence of the guru
vasan dānto guror hitam
vasan
by living
dāntaḥ
continuously practicing control of the senses
guroḥ hitam
only for the benefit of the guru (not for one’s personal benefit)
ācaran dāsavan nīco
ācaran
practicing
dāsa-vat
very humbly, like a slave
nīcaḥ
submissive, obedient
gurau sudṛḍha-sauhṛdaḥ
gurau
unto the spiritual master
su-dṛḍha
firmly
sauhṛdaḥ
in friendship or good will.
Nārada Muni said: A student should practice completely controlling his senses. He should be submissive and should have an attitude of firm friendship for the spiritual master. With a great vow, the brahmacārī should live at the gurukula, only for the benefit of the guru.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: A student, controlling his senses, living in the guru-kula, acting only for the benefit of the guru, should be submissive to the guru like a servant, with firm faint and friendship towards him. In the Twelfth Chapter the normal duties of the āśramas for a person in a varṇa and the rules for giving up the body for the vanāprastha are described. The verb of the sentence upāsīta “he should worship” is in the next verse.
A brahmacārī student should fully control his senses, be submissive, hold firm friendship with the guru, and live at the gurukula for the guru's benefit, not his own. Real student-hood is structural, not casual. Submission is not weakness; it is the condition of receiving.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you 'study' from a teacher without actual submission to their direction?
  • What would 'living for the guru' rather than for yourself look like for one week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.2

↗
सायं प्रातरुपासीत गुर्वग्‍न्यर्कसुरोत्तमान् । सन्ध्ये उभे च यतवाग्जपन्ब्रह्म समाहित: ॥ २ ॥
sāyaṁ prātar upāsīta
[saayam praatar upaaseeta]
gurv-agny-arka-surottamān
[gurv-agny-arka-surottamaan]
sandhye ubhe ca yata-vāg
[sandhye ubhe cha yata-vaag]
japan brahma samāhitaḥ
[japan brahma samaahitah]
sāyam — in the evening prātaḥ — in the morning upāsīta — he should worship guru — the spiritual master agni — the fire (by a fire sacrifice) arka — the sun sura-uttamān — and Lord Viṣṇu, Puruṣottama, the best of personalities sandhye — morning and evening ubhe — both ca — also yata-vāk — without talking, being silent japan — murmuring brahma — the Gāyatrī mantra samāhitaḥ — being fully absorbed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāyaṁ prātar upāsīta
sāyam
in the evening
prātaḥ
in the morning
upāsīta
he should worship
gurv-agny-arka-surottamān
guru
the spiritual master
agni
the fire (by a fire sacrifice)
arka
the sun
sura-uttamān
and Lord Viṣṇu, Puruṣottama, the best of personalities
sandhye ubhe ca yata-vāg
sandhye
morning and evening
ubhe
both
ca
also
yata-vāk
without talking, being silent
japan brahma samāhitaḥ
japan
murmuring
brahma
the Gāyatrī mantra
samāhitaḥ
being fully absorbed.
At both junctions of day and night, namely, in the early morning and in the evening, he should be fully absorbed in thoughts of the spiritual master, fire, the sun-god and Lord Viṣṇu and by chanting the Gāyatrī mantra he should worship them.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the early morning and in the evening at the sandhyas, silently, chanting the gāyatrī mantra with attention, he should worship the guru, fire, the sun-god and Viṣṇu. Brahma means gāyatrī.
Twice daily — early morning and evening — fully absorb yourself in the guru, fire, sun, and Viṣṇu, chanting Gāyatrī. Spiritual life is calibrated to the day's natural rhythm. Sandhyā is not optional ornament; it is the spine of practice.
Reflection Questions
  • Which junction of the day — dawn or dusk — do you waste that could be made sacred?
  • What simple two-minute observance could anchor those moments this month?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.3

↗
छन्दांस्यधीयीत गुरोराहूतश्चेत् सुयन्त्रित: । उपक्रमेऽवसाने च चरणौ शिरसा नमेत् ॥ ३ ॥
chandāṁsy adhīyīta guror
[chandaamsy adheeyeeta guror]
āhūtaś cet suyantritaḥ
[aahootash chet suyantritah]
upakrame ’vasāne ca
[upakrame ’vasaane cha]
caraṇau śirasā namet
[charanau shirasaa namet]
chandāṁsi — mantras in the Vedas, like the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra and the Gāyatrī mantra adhīyīta — one should chant or read regularly guroḥ — from the spiritual master āhūtaḥ — being addressed or called (by him) cet — if su-yantritaḥ — faithful, well-behaved upakrame — in the beginning avasāne — at the end (of reading Vedic mantras) ca — also caraṇau — at the lotus feet śirasā — by the head namet — one should offer obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
chandāṁsy adhīyīta guror
chandāṁsi
mantras in the Vedas, like the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra and the Gāyatrī mantra
adhīyīta
one should chant or read regularly
guroḥ
from the spiritual master
āhūtaś cet suyantritaḥ
āhūtaḥ
being addressed or called (by him)
cet
if
su-yantritaḥ
faithful, well-behaved
upakrame ’vasāne ca
upakrame
in the beginning
avasāne
at the end (of reading Vedic mantras)
ca
also
caraṇau śirasā namet
caraṇau
at the lotus feet
śirasā
by the head
namet
one should offer obeisances.
Being called by the spiritual master, the student should study the Vedic mantras regularly. Every day, before beginning his studies and at the end of his studies, the disciple should respectfully offer obeisances unto the spiritual master.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being called by the guru, the student should carefully study the Vedic mantras and, at the beginning his studies and the end of his studies, the disciple should respectfully offer obeisances to the guru’s feet with his head.
When called by the guru, the student studies the Vedic mantras regularly; before and after, he offers obeisances. Study is bracketed by reverence. The bow opens the book; the bow closes it.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you study sacred material without bracketing it in reverence?
  • What small ritual could mark the beginning and end of your study?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.4

↗
मेखलाजिनवासांसि जटादण्डकमण्डलून् । बिभृयादुपवीतं च दर्भपाणिर्यथोदितम् ॥ ४ ॥
mekhalājina-vāsāṁsi
[mekhalaajina-vaasaamsi]
jaṭā-daṇḍa-kamaṇḍalūn
[jataa-danda-kamandaloon]
bibhṛyād upavītaṁ ca
[bibhriyaad upaveetam cha]
darbha-pāṇir yathoditam
[darbha-paanir yathoditam]
mekhalā — a belt made of straw ajina-vāsāṁsi — garments made of deerskin jaṭā — matted hair daṇḍa — a rod kamaṇḍalūn — and a waterpot known as a kamaṇḍalu bibhṛyāt — he (the brahmacārī) should regularly carry or wear upavītam ca — and a sacred thread darbha-pāṇiḥ — taking purified kuśa in his hand yathā uditam — as recommended in the śāstras..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mekhalājina-vāsāṁsi
mekhalā
a belt made of straw
ajina-vāsāṁsi
garments made of deerskin
jaṭā-daṇḍa-kamaṇḍalūn
jaṭā
matted hair
daṇḍa
a rod
kamaṇḍalūn
and a waterpot known as a kamaṇḍalu
bibhṛyād upavītaṁ ca
bibhṛyāt
he (the brahmacārī) should regularly carry or wear
upavītam ca
and a sacred thread
darbha-pāṇir yathoditam
darbha-pāṇiḥ
taking purified kuśa in his hand
yathā uditam
as recommended in the śāstras..
Carrying pure kuśa grass in his hand, the brahmacārī should dress regularly with a belt of straw and with deerskin garments. He should wear matted hair, carry a rod and waterpot and be decorated with a sacred thread, as recommended in the śāstras.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With kuśa ring and matted locks, the brahmacārī should dress with a belt of straw, deerskin garments, and sacred thread, and carry a rod and water pot as recommended in the scriptures.
The brahmacārī wears matted hair, deerskin, kuśa grass, straw belt, sacred thread; carries rod and waterpot. Outward simplicity protects inward focus. The dress code is not aesthetic but functional.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is your outward complexity sabotaging inward focus?
  • What single simplification of your appearance would protect your practice?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.5

↗
सायं प्रातश्चरेद्भ‍ैक्ष्यं गुरवे तन्निवेदयेत् । भुञ्जीत यद्यनुज्ञातो नो चेदुपवसेत् क्‍वचित् ॥ ५ ॥
sāyaṁ prātaś cared bhaikṣyaṁ
[saayam praatash chared bhaikshyam]
gurave tan nivedayet
[gurave tan nivedayet]
bhuñjīta yady anujñāto
[bhunjeeta yady anujnaato]
no ced upavaset kvacit
[no ched upavaset kvachit]
sāyam — in the evening prātaḥ — in the morning caret — should go out bhaikṣyam — to collect alms gurave — unto the spiritual master tat — all that he collects nivedayet — should offer bhuñjīta — he should eat yadi — if anujñātaḥ — ordered (by the spiritual master) no — otherwise cet — if upavaset — should observe fasting kvacit — sometimes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāyaṁ prātaś cared bhaikṣyaṁ
sāyam
in the evening
prātaḥ
in the morning
caret
should go out
bhaikṣyam
to collect alms
gurave tan nivedayet
gurave
unto the spiritual master
tat
all that he collects
nivedayet
should offer
bhuñjīta yady anujñāto
bhuñjīta
he should eat
yadi
if
anujñātaḥ
ordered (by the spiritual master)
no ced upavaset kvacit
no
otherwise
cet
if
upavaset
should observe fasting
kvacit
sometimes.
The brahmacārī should go out morning and evening to collect alms, and he should offer all that he collects to the spiritual master. He should eat only if ordered to take food by the spiritual master; otherwise, if the spiritual master does not give this order, he may sometimes have to fast.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The brahmacārī should go out in the morning and evening to collect alms and should offer all that he collects to the guru. He should eat only if ordered to take food by the guru; otherwise, if the spiritual master does not give this order, he should fast.
The brahmacārī begs alms morning and evening, offers everything to the guru, and eats only when ordered. The pattern is: collect, offer up, receive back. Refusing to keep what you collect is the deepest economic training.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you take what you have collected as if it were yours, rather than offering it up first?
  • What 'fast' might a teacher actually order if consulted, and would you accept it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.6

↗
सुशीलो मितभुग्दक्ष: श्रद्दधानो जितेन्द्रिय: । यावदर्थं व्यवहरेत् स्त्रीषु स्त्रीनिर्जितेषु च ॥ ६ ॥
suśīlo mita-bhug dakṣaḥ
[susheelo mita-bhug dakshah]
śraddadhāno jitendriyaḥ
[shraddadhaano jitendriyah]
yāvad-arthaṁ vyavaharet
[yaavad-artham vyavaharet]
strīṣu strī-nirjiteṣu ca
[streeshu stree-nirjiteshu cha]
su-śīlaḥ — very polite and well-behaved mita-bhuk — eating only exactly what he needs, neither more nor less dakṣaḥ — expert or without laziness, always busy śraddadhānaḥ — possessing full faith in the instructions of the śāstra and the spiritual master jita-indriyaḥ — having full control over the senses yāvat-artham — as much as necessary vyavaharet — should behave externally strīṣu — unto women strī-nirjiteṣu — men who are henpecked, controlled by women ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
suśīlo mita-bhug dakṣaḥ
su-śīlaḥ
very polite and well-behaved
mita-bhuk
eating only exactly what he needs, neither more nor less
dakṣaḥ
expert or without laziness, always busy
śraddadhāno jitendriyaḥ
śraddadhānaḥ
possessing full faith in the instructions of the śāstra and the spiritual master
jita-indriyaḥ
having full control over the senses
yāvat-artham
as much as necessary
yāvad-arthaṁ vyavaharet
vyavaharet
should behave externally
strīṣu strī-nirjiteṣu ca
strīṣu
unto women
strī-nirjiteṣu
men who are henpecked, controlled by women
ca
also.
A brahmacārī should be quite well-behaved and gentle and should not eat or collect more than necessary. He must always be active and expert, fully believing in the instructions of the spiritual master and the śāstra. Fully controlling his senses, he should associate only as much as necessary with women or those controlled by women.

A brahmacārī should be very careful not to mix with women or with men addicted to women. Although when he goes out to beg alms it is necessary to talk with women and with men very much attached to women, this association should be very short, and he should talk with them only about begging alms, and not more. A brahmacārī should be very careful in associating with men who are attached to women.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A brahmacārī should be well behaved, in control of his eating, industrious, faithful, in control of his senses, and should interact with women and men who are controlled by women only as much as necessary. He may have to go to householders to beg, or go to the guru’s house (assuming the guru is married) to do service. That much he can interact with women.
Well-behaved, gentle, not over-eating or over-collecting, active, expert, full faith in guru and śāstra, controlled senses, minimal association with women or men attached to women. Even necessary contact is brief and businesslike.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'necessary' association in your life has expanded beyond businesslike contact?
  • How could brevity restore protection without becoming coldness?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.7

↗
वर्जयेत्प्रमदागाथामगृहस्थो बृहद्‌व्रत: । इन्द्रियाणि प्रमाथीनि हरन्त्यपि यतेर्मन: ॥ ७ ॥
varjayet pramadā-gāthām
[varjayet pramadaa-gaathaam]
agṛhastho bṛhad-vrataḥ
[agrihastho brihad-vratah]
indriyāṇi pramāthīni
[indriyaani pramaatheeni]
haranty api yater manaḥ
[haranty api yater manah]
varjayet — must give up pramadā-gāthām — talking with women agṛhasthaḥ — a person who has not accepted the gṛhastha-āśrama (a brahmacārī or sannyāsī) bṛhat-vrataḥ — invariably observing the vow of celibacy indriyāṇi — the senses pramāthīni — almost always unconquerable haranti — take away api — even yateḥ — of the sannyāsī manaḥ — the mind.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
varjayet pramadā-gāthām
varjayet
must give up
pramadā-gāthām
talking with women
agṛhasthaḥ
a person who has not accepted the gṛhastha-āśrama (a brahmacārī or sannyāsī)
agṛhastho bṛhad-vrataḥ
bṛhat-vrataḥ
invariably observing the vow of celibacy
indriyāṇi pramāthīni
indriyāṇi
the senses
pramāthīni
almost always unconquerable
haranty api yater manaḥ
haranti
take away
api
even
yateḥ
of the sannyāsī
manaḥ
the mind.
A brahmacārī, or one who has not accepted the gṛhastha-āśrama [family life], must rigidly avoid talking with women or about women, for the senses are so powerful that they may agitate even the mind of a sannyāsī, a member of the renounced order of life.

Brahmacarya essentially means the vow not to marry but to observe strict celibacy ( bṛhad-vrata ). A brahmacārī or sannyāsī should avoid talking with women or reading literature concerning talks between man and woman. The injunction restricting association with women is the basic principle of spiritual life. Associating or talking with women is never advised in any of the Vedic literatures. The entire Vedic system teaches one to avoid sex life so that one may gradually progress from brahmacarya to gṛhastha, from gṛhastha to vānaprastha, and from vānaprastha to sannyāsa and thus give up material enjoyment, which is the original cause of bondage to this material world. The word bṛhad-vrata refers to one who has decided not to marry, or in other words, not to indulge in sex life throughout his entire life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Anyone who has not accepted the gṛhastha-āśrama, must avoid talking with women or about women, for the senses are so powerful that they may agitate even the mind of a sannyāsī or brahmacārī with a lifelong vow of celibacy. Other than householders, all should avoid talk with women. Bṛhad-vrataḥ refers to a brahmacārī who vows to remain that way for life.
Brahmacārī must rigidly avoid talking with or about women — the senses can agitate even a sannyāsī's mind. The basic principle of spiritual life is restraint of intersexual interaction. Underestimate this and fail.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you assumed your spiritual stage makes this principle no longer applicable?
  • What honest pattern of intersexual interaction needs review in your life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.8

↗
केशप्रसाधनोन्मर्दस्‍नपनाभ्यञ्जनादिकम् । गुरुस्त्रीभिर्युवतिभि: कारयेन्नात्मनो युवा ॥ ८ ॥
keśa-prasādhanonmarda-
[kesha-prasaadhanonmarda-]
snapanābhyañjanādikam
[snapanaabhyanjanaadikam]
guru-strībhir yuvatibhiḥ
[guru-streebhir yuvatibhih]
kārayen nātmano yuvā
[kaarayen naatmano yuvaa]
keśa-prasādhana — brushing the hair unmarda — massaging the body snapana — bathing abhyañjana-ādikam — massaging the body with oil and so on guru-strībhiḥ — by the wife of the spiritual master yuvatibhiḥ — very young kārayet — should allow to do na — never ātmanaḥ — for personal service yuvā — if the student is a young man.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
keśa-prasādhanonmarda-
keśa-prasādhana
brushing the hair
unmarda
massaging the body
snapanābhyañjanādikam
snapana
bathing
abhyañjana-ādikam
massaging the body with oil and so on
guru-strībhir yuvatibhiḥ
guru-strībhiḥ
by the wife of the spiritual master
yuvatibhiḥ
very young
kārayen nātmano yuvā
kārayet
should allow to do
na
never
ātmanaḥ
for personal service
yuvā
if the student is a young man.
If the wife of the spiritual master is young, a young brahmacārī should not allow her to care for his hair, massage his body with oil, or bathe him with affection like a mother.

The relationship between the student or disciple and the wife of the spiritual master or teacher is like that between son and mother. A mother sometimes cares for her son by combing his hair, massaging his body with oil, or bathing him. Similarly, the wife of the teacher is also a mother ( guru-patnī ), and therefore she may also care for the disciple in a motherly way. If the wife of the teacher is a young woman, however, a young brahmacārī should not allow such a mother to touch him. This is strictly prohibited. There are seven kinds of mothers:

ātma-mātā guroḥ patnī brāhmaṇī rāja-patnikā dhenur dhātrī tathā pṛthvī saptaitā mātaraḥ smṛtāḥ

These mothers are the original mother, the wife of the teacher or spiritual master, the wife of a brāhmaṇa, the king’s wife, the cow, the nurse and the earth. Unnecessary association with women, even with one’s mother, sister or daughter, is strictly prohibited. This is human civilization. A civilization that allows men to mix unrestrictedly with women is an animal civilization. In Kali-yuga, people are extremely liberal, but mixing with women and talking with them as equals actually constitutes an uncivilized way of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If the wife of the guru is young, a young brahmacārī should not allow her to dress his hair, massage his body with oil, or bathe him with affection like a mother. If the wife of the guru sees the student as a son out of affection and wants to dress his hair or do other such services by her own will, it should not be allowed.
If the guru's wife is young, the brahmacārī should not allow her to oil his hair, massage him, or bathe him like a mother. Even legitimate motherly care has bounds. The relationship is real; the boundary is also real.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is a legitimate relationship in your life lacking explicit boundaries?
  • What honest constraint would honor both the relationship and the danger?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.9

↗
नन्वग्नि: प्रमदा नाम घृतकुम्भसम: पुमान् । सुतामपि रहो जह्यादन्यदा यावदर्थकृत् ॥ ९ ॥
nanv agniḥ pramadā nāma
[nanv agnih pramadaa naama]
ghṛta-kumbha-samaḥ pumān
[ghrita-kumbha-samah pumaan]
sutām api raho jahyād
[sutaam api raho jahyaad]
anyadā yāvad-artha-kṛt
[anyadaa yaavad-artha-krit]
nanu — certainly agniḥ — the fire pramadā — the woman (one who bewilders the mind of man) nāma — the very name ghṛta-kumbha — a pot of butter samaḥ — like pumān — a man sutām api — even one’s daughter rahaḥ — in a secluded place jahyāt — one must not associate with anyadā — with other women also yāvat — as much as artha-kṛt — required.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nanv agniḥ pramadā nāma
nanu
certainly
agniḥ
the fire
pramadā
the woman (one who bewilders the mind of man)
nāma
the very name
ghṛta-kumbha-samaḥ pumān
ghṛta-kumbha
a pot of butter
samaḥ
like
pumān
a man
sutām api raho jahyād
sutām api
even one’s daughter
rahaḥ
in a secluded place
jahyāt
one must not associate with
anyadā yāvad-artha-kṛt
anyadā
with other women also
yāvat
as much as
artha-kṛt
required.
Woman is compared to fire, and man is compared to a butter pot. Therefore a man should avoid associating even with his own daughter in a secluded place. Similarly, he should also avoid association with other women. One should associate with women only for important business and not otherwise.

If a butter pot and fire are kept together, the butter within the pot will certainly melt. Woman is compared to fire, and man is compared to a butter pot. However advanced one may be in restraining the senses, it is almost impossible for a man to keep himself controlled in the presence of a woman, even if she is his own daughter, mother or sister. Indeed, his mind is agitated even if one is in the renounced order of life. Therefore, Vedic civilization carefully restricts mingling between men and women. If one cannot understand the basic principle of restraining association between man and woman, he is to be considered an animal. That is the purport of this verse.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Woman is compared to fire and man is compared to a butter pot. Therefore a man should avoid associating even with his own daughter in a secluded place. One should associate with women only for important business, even if one is not alone. The reason for the rule is given in this verse. Rahaḥ means alone. Anyadā means in other circumstances, even if not alone. Even if not alone one should associate with women only when necessary to fulfill certain goals, and only for that long.
Woman is fire; man is a butter pot — even with one's own daughter, a man avoids seclusion. Sense-control is not assumed but structurally protected. Don't rely on willpower where structure suffices.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you rely on willpower in situations that structure could simply remove?
  • What architectural change could protect a relationship from melt-down?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.10

↗
कल्पयित्वात्मना यावदाभासमिदमीश्वर: । द्वैतं तावन्न विरमेत्ततो ह्यस्य विपर्यय: ॥ १० ॥
kalpayitvātmanā yāvad
[kalpayitvaatmanaa yaavad]
ābhāsam idam īśvaraḥ
[aabhaasam idam eeshvarah]
dvaitaṁ tāvan na viramet
[dvaitam taavan na viramet]
tato hy asya viparyayaḥ
[tato hy asya viparyayah]
kalpayitvā — ascertaining positively ātmanā — by self-realization yāvat — as long as ābhāsam — reflection (of the original body and senses) idam — this (the body and senses) īśvaraḥ — completely independent of illusion dvaitam — duality tāvat — for that long na — does not viramet — see tataḥ — by such duality hi — indeed asya — of the person viparyayaḥ — counteraction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kalpayitvātmanā yāvad
kalpayitvā
ascertaining positively
ātmanā
by self-realization
yāvat
as long as
ābhāsam idam īśvaraḥ
ābhāsam
reflection (of the original body and senses)
idam
this (the body and senses)
īśvaraḥ
completely independent of illusion
dvaitaṁ tāvan na viramet
dvaitam
duality
tāvat
for that long
na
does not
viramet
see
tato hy asya viparyayaḥ
tataḥ
by such duality
hi
indeed
asya
of the person
viparyayaḥ
counteraction.
As long as a living entity is not completely self-realized — as long as he is not independent of the misconception of identifying with his body, which is nothing but a reflection of the original body and senses — he cannot be relieved of the conception of duality, which is epitomized by the duality between man and woman. Thus there is every chance that he will fall down because his intelligence is bewildered.

Here is another important warning that a man must save himself from attraction to woman. Until one is self-realized, fully independent of the illusory conception of the material body, the duality of man and woman must undoubtedly continue, but when one is actually self-realized this distinction ceases.

vidyā-vinaya-sampanne brāhmaṇe gavi hastini śuni caiva śvapāke ca paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ

“The humble sage, by virtue of true knowledge, sees with equal vision a learned and gentle brāhmaṇa, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater [outcaste].” ( Bg. 5.18 ) On the spiritual platform, the learned person not only gives up the duality of man and woman, but also gives up the duality of man and animal. This is the test of self-realization. One must realize perfectly that the living being is spirit soul but is tasting various types of material bodies. One may theoretically understand this, but when one has practical realization, then he actually becomes a paṇḍita, one who knows. Until that time, the duality continues, and the conception of man and woman also continues. In this stage, one should be extremely careful about mixing with women. No one should think himself perfect and forget the śāstric instruction that one should be very careful about associating even with his daughter, mother or sister, not to speak of other women. Śrīla Madhvācārya cites the following ślokas in this regard:

bahutvenaiva vastūnāṁ yathārtha-jñānam ucyate advaita-jñānam ity etad dvaita-jñānaṁ tad-anyathā

yathā jñānaṁ tathā vastu yathā vastus tathā matiḥ naiva jñānārthayor bhedas tata ekatva-vedanam

Unity in variety is real knowledge, and therefore giving up variety artificially does not reflect perfect knowledge of monism. According to the acintya-bhedābheda philosophy of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there are varieties, but all of them constitute one unit. Such knowledge is knowledge of perfect oneness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though one is capable of seeing the world as illusion, as long as a person remains with his mind, he cannot give up thinking of differences between men and women. From that, he reverts to saṁsāra. “Can the jñānī who has controlled the senses and is completely detached be harmed by association with women?” Even though one capable of knowledge (īśvaraḥ) sees the identity with body as illusion, in the manner of negating the reality of world on seeing the truth, and considers everything as insignificant (ābhāsam), as names only, by knowledge of the truth, as long as he remains with his mind (ātmanā), he cannot give up duality--thoughts of difference such as “I am a man and this is a woman. She is attractive to me.” Then he reverts to his previous state of saṁsāra (viparyayaḥ). Or there is another meaning. “What fear does a person who has conquered his senses and has given up relationships with sons, wife and friends have from those persons?” Having given up material things, as long as he conceives to some degree (ābhāsam) by his mind that “This is my wife, this is my mother, this is my son” and becomes controlled (iśvaraḥ) by the happiness arising from such affection, to that degree he cannot give up difference (dvaitam). “Since it is such a small amount of misconception, why worry?” This still creates saṁsāra.
Related verses
Until self-realized — independent of the body-mind — duality of man and woman persists. Bewildered intelligence means every chance of falling. Don't pretend to a non-dual realization the body still negates.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you claim a non-duality your body has not yet internalized?
  • What honest acknowledgment of your stage would protect you better than pretense?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.11

↗
एतत्सर्वं गृहस्थस्य समाम्नातं यतेरपि । गुरुवृत्तिर्विकल्पेन गृहस्थस्यर्तुगामिन: ॥ ११ ॥
etat sarvaṁ gṛhasthasya
[etat sarvam grihasthasya]
samāmnātaṁ yater api
[samaamnaatam yater api]
guru-vṛttir vikalpena
[guru-vrittir vikalpena]
gṛhasthasyartu-gāminaḥ
[grihasthasyartu-gaaminah]
etat — this sarvam — all gṛhasthasya — of a householder samāmnātam — described yateḥ api — even of the person in the renounced order guru-vṛttiḥ vikalpena — to follow the orders of the spiritual master gṛhasthasya — of the householder ṛtu-gāminaḥ — accepting sex only during the period favorable for procreation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etat sarvaṁ gṛhasthasya
etat
this
sarvam
all
gṛhasthasya
of a householder
samāmnātaṁ yater api
samāmnātam
described
yateḥ api
even of the person in the renounced order
guru-vṛttir vikalpena
guru-vṛttiḥ vikalpena
to follow the orders of the spiritual master
gṛhasthasyartu-gāminaḥ
gṛhasthasya
of the householder
ṛtu-gāminaḥ
accepting sex only during the period favorable for procreation.
All the rules and regulations apply equally to the householder and the sannyāsī, the member of the renounced order of life. The gṛhastha, however, is given permission by the spiritual master to indulge in sex during the period favorable for procreation.

It is sometimes misunderstood that a gṛhastha, a householder, is permitted to indulge in sex at any time. This is a wrong conception of gṛhastha life. In spiritual life, whether one is a gṛhastha, vānaprastha, sannyāsī or brahmacārī, everyone is under the control of the spiritual master. For brahmacārīs and sannyāsīs there are strong restrictions on sexual indulgence. Similarly, there are strong restrictions for gṛhasthas. Gṛhasthas should indulge in sex life only in accordance with the order of the guru. Therefore it is mentioned here that one must follow the orders of the spiritual master ( guru-vṛttir vikalpena ). When the spiritual master orders, the gṛhastha may accept sex life. This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (7.11) . Dharmāviruddho bhūteṣu kāmo ’smi: indulgence in sex life without disobedience to the religious rules and regulations constitutes a religious principle. The gṛhastha is allowed to indulge in sex life during the period favorable for procreation and in accordance with the spiritual master’s order. If the spiritual master’s orders allow a gṛhastha to engage in sex life at a particular time, then the gṛhastha may do so; otherwise, if the spiritual master orders against it, the gṛhastha should abstain. The gṛhastha must obtain permission from the spiritual master to observe the ritualistic ceremony of garbhādhāna-saṁskāra. Then he may approach his wife to beget children, otherwise not. A brāhmaṇa generally remains a brahmacārī throughout his entire life, but although some brāhmaṇas become gṛhasthas and indulge in sex life, they do so under the complete control of the spiritual master. The kṣatriya is allowed to marry more than one wife, but this also must be in accordance with the instructions of the spiritual master. It is not that because one is a gṛhastha he may marry as many times as he likes and indulge in sex life as he likes. This is not spiritual life. In spiritual life, one must conduct one’s whole life under the guidance of the guru. Only one who executes his spiritual life under the direction of the spiritual master can achieve the mercy of Kṛṣṇa. Yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādaḥ . If one desires to advance in spiritual life but he acts whimsically, not following the orders of the spiritual master, he has no shelter. Yasyāprasādān na gatiḥ kuto ’pi . Without the spiritual master’s order, even the gṛhastha should not indulge in sex life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
All these rules described apply equally to the householder and the sannyāsī. But the decision of the householder to maintain brahmacārī vows is according to his decision. The rules from verse 6 apply to others as well. The person decides if he should or should not have children (vikalpena).
Same rules of restraint apply to gṛhastha and sannyāsī alike — gṛhasthas are only permitted procreative sex with guru's sanction. Even married life is not unrestricted. Marriage is not a license to abandon discipline.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you treat marriage as a license to abandon disciplines that still apply?
  • What guru-sanction (in the broadest sense) would shape your intimate choices?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.12

↗
अञ्जनाभ्यञ्जनोन्मर्दस्त्र्यवलेखामिषं मधु । स्रग्गन्धलेपालङ्कारांस्त्यजेयुर्ये बृहद्‌व्रता: ॥ १२ ॥
añjanābhyañjanonmarda-
[anjanaabhyanjanonmarda-]
stry-avalekhāmiṣaṁ madhu
[stry-avalekhaamisham madhu]
srag-gandha-lepālaṅkārāṁs
[srag-gandha-lepaalankaaraams]
tyajeyur ye bṛhad-vratāḥ
[tyajeyur ye brihad-vrataah]
añjana — ointment or powder for decorating the eyes abhyañjana — massaging the head unmarda — massaging the body strī-avalekha — to glance over a woman or to paint a woman’s picture āmiṣam — meat-eating madhu — drinking liquor or honey srak — decorating the body with garlands of flowers gandha-lepa — smearing the body with scented ointment alaṅkārān — decorating the body with ornaments tyajeyuḥ — must give up ye — those who bṛhat-vratāḥ — have taken the vow of celibacy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
añjanābhyañjanonmarda-
añjana
ointment or powder for decorating the eyes
abhyañjana
massaging the head
unmarda
massaging the body
stry-avalekhāmiṣaṁ madhu
strī-avalekha
to glance over a woman or to paint a woman’s picture
āmiṣam
meat-eating
madhu
drinking liquor or honey
srag-gandha-lepālaṅkārāṁs
srak
decorating the body with garlands of flowers
gandha-lepa
smearing the body with scented ointment
alaṅkārān
decorating the body with ornaments
tyajeyur ye bṛhad-vratāḥ
tyajeyuḥ
must give up
ye
those who
bṛhat-vratāḥ
have taken the vow of celibacy.
Brahmacārīs or gṛhasthas who have taken the vow of celibacy as described above should not indulge in the following: applying powder or ointment to the eyes, massaging the head with oil, massaging the body with the hands, seeing a woman or painting a woman’s picture, eating meat, drinking wine, decorating the body with flower garlands, smearing scented ointment on the body, or decorating the body with ornaments. These they should give up.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Those who takes a lifetime brahmacārī vow should not indulge in the following: oiling the body, oiling the head, massaging the body, associating with women, painting pictures, eating meat, drinking wine, decorating the body with flower garlands, smearing sandalwood on the body, or decorating the body with ornaments. These they should give up. Añjana is applying oil on the body and abhyañjana is applying oil on the head. Associating with women and painting are separate items. These items are by their nature forbidden. Even in emergencies these should not be done. This is the difference with the injunction in verse 8.
Vow-takers should give up eye ointments, oil massages, hand-massages of the body, seeing or painting women, meat, wine, garlands, scented ointments, and ornaments. Sensual upkeep maintains sensual attachment. Drop the upkeep, drop the addiction.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'sensual upkeep' in your life maintains the attachment you wish to release?
  • What single such item could you drop this month?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.13-14

↗
उषित्वैवं गुरुकुले द्विजोऽधीत्यावबुध्य च । त्रयीं साङ्गोपनिषदं यावदर्थं यथाबलम् ॥ १३ ॥ दत्त्वा वरमनुज्ञातो गुरो: कामं यदीश्वर: । गृहं वनं वा प्रविशेत्प्रव्रजेत्तत्र वा वसेत् ॥ १४ ॥
uṣitvaivaṁ gurukule
[ushitvaivam gurukule]
dvijo ’dhītyāvabudhya ca
[dvijo ’dheetyaavabudhya cha]
trayīṁ sāṅgopaniṣadaṁ
[trayeem saangopanishadam]
yāvad-arthaṁ yathā-balam
[yaavad-artham yathaa-balam]
dattvā varam anujñāto
[dattvaa varam anujnaato]
guroḥ kāmaṁ yadīśvaraḥ
[guroh kaamam yadeeshvarah]
gṛhaṁ vanaṁ vā praviśet
[griham vanam vaa pravishet]
pravrajet tatra vā vaset
[pravrajet tatra vaa vaset]
uṣitvā — residing evam — in this way gurukule — under the care of the spiritual master dvi-jaḥ — the twice-born, namely the brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas adhītya — studying Vedic literature avabudhya — understanding it properly ca — and trayīm — the Vedic literatures sa-aṅga — along with supplementary parts upaniṣadam — as well as the Upaniṣads yāvat-artham — as far as possible yathā-balam — as far as one can, according to one’s ability dattvā — giving varam — remuneration anujñātaḥ — being asked guroḥ — of the spiritual master kāmam — desires yadi — if īśvaraḥ — capable gṛham — household life vanam — retired life vā — either praviśet — one should enter pravrajet — or get out of tatra — there vā — either vaset — should reside.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uṣitvaivaṁ gurukule
uṣitvā
residing
evam
in this way
gurukule
under the care of the spiritual master
dvijo ’dhītyāvabudhya ca
dvi-jaḥ
the twice-born, namely the brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas
trayīṁ sāṅgopaniṣadaṁ
adhītya
studying Vedic literature
yāvad-arthaṁ yathā-balam
avabudhya
understanding it properly
ca
and
dattvā varam anujñāto
guroḥ kāmaṁ yadīśvaraḥ
gṛhaṁ vanaṁ vā praviśet
pravrajet tatra vā vaset
trayīm
the Vedic literatures
sa-aṅga
along with supplementary parts
upaniṣadam
as well as the Upaniṣads
yāvat-artham
as far as possible
yathā-balam
as far as one can, according to one’s ability
dattvā
giving
varam
remuneration
anujñātaḥ
being asked
guroḥ
of the spiritual master
kāmam
desires
yadi
if
īśvaraḥ
capable
gṛham
household life
vanam
retired life
vā
either
praviśet
one should enter
pravrajet
or get out of
tatra
there
vā
either
vaset
should reside.
According to the rules and regulations mentioned above, one who is twice-born, namely a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya or vaiśya, should reside in the gurukula under the care of the spiritual master. There he should study and learn all the Vedic literatures along with their supplements and the Upaniṣads, according to his ability and power to study. If possible, the student or disciple should reward the spiritual master with the remuneration the spiritual master requests, and then, following the master’s order, the disciple should leave and accept one of the other āśramas, namely the gṛhastha-āśrama, vānaprastha-āśrama or sannyāsa-āśrama, as he desires.

To study the Vedas and understand them, of course, requires some special intelligence, but the members of the three higher sections of society — namely the brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas and vaiśyas — must learn the Vedic literatures according to their capability and power to understand. In other words, studying the Vedic literatures is compulsory for everyone but the śūdras and antyajas. The Vedic literature gives the knowledge that can lead one to understand the Absolute Truth — Brahman, Paramātmā or Bhagavān. Gurukula, or the reformatory educational institution, should be used only to understand Vedic knowledge. At the present time there are many educational institutions for training and technology, but such knowledge has nothing to do with understanding of the Absolute Truth. Technology, therefore, is meant for the śūdras, whereas the Vedas are meant for the dvijas. Consequently this verse states, dvijo ’dhītyāvabudhya ca trayīṁ sāṅgopaniṣadam. At the present time, in the Age of Kali, practically everyone is a śūdra, and no one is a dvija. Therefore the condition of society has very much deteriorated.

Another point to be observed from this verse is that from the brahmacārī-āśrama one may accept the sannyāsa-āśrama, vānaprastha-āśrama or gṛhastha-āśrama. It is not compulsory for a brahmacārī to become a gṛhastha. Because the ultimate aim is to understand the Absolute Truth, there is no necessity of going through all the different āśramas. Thus one may proceed to the sannyāsa-āśrama directly from the brahmacārī-āśrama. Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura accepted the sannyāsa-āśrama directly from the brahmacārī-āśrama. In other words, His Divine Grace Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura did not think it compulsory to accept the gṛhastha-āśrama or vānaprastha-āśrama.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
According to the rules and regulations mentioned above, one who is twice-born, namely a brāhmaṇa, kṣatriya or vaiśya, should reside in the guru-kula and study and learn all the Vedic literatures along with their supplements and the Upaniṣads, according to his ability and power to study. According to his means, the student should reward the guru with what he desires, and then, taking permission from the guru , the disciple should leave and accept one of the other āśramas, namely the gṛhastha-āśrama, vānaprastha-āśrama or sannyāsa-āśrama or remain there as a naiṣṭhika-brahmacārī. As far as possible he should give a gift to the guru as desired by the guru and enter household life. Or he can stay there as a naiṣṭhika-brahmacārī.
The twice-born study Vedic literature in the gurukula per ability, reward the guru, then with permission move to gṛhastha, vānaprastha, or sannyāsa. Study, reward, transition — a clear progression. Skipping any step destabilizes the next.
Reflection Questions
  • Which step in your spiritual progression did you skip, and what destabilization followed?
  • What 'reward to the guru' is overdue in your life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.15

↗
अग्नौ गुरावात्मनि च सर्वभूतेष्वधोक्षजम् । भूतै: स्वधामभि: पश्येदप्रविष्टं प्रविष्टवत् ॥ १५ ॥
agnau gurāv ātmani ca
[agnau guraav aatmani cha]
sarva-bhūteṣv adhokṣajam
[sarva-bhooteshv adhokshajam]
bhūtaiḥ sva-dhāmabhiḥ paśyed
[bhootaih sva-dhaamabhih pashyed]
apraviṣṭaṁ praviṣṭavat
[apravishtam pravishtavat]
agnau — in the fire gurau — in the spiritual master ātmani — in one’s self ca — also sarva-bhūteṣu — in every living entity adhokṣajam — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who cannot be seen or perceived with the material eyes or other material senses bhūtaiḥ — with all living entities sva-dhāmabhiḥ — along with His Lordship’s paraphernalia paśyet — one should see apraviṣṭam — not entered praviṣṭa-vat — also entered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
agnau gurāv ātmani ca
agnau
in the fire
gurau
in the spiritual master
ātmani
in one’s self
ca
also
sarva-bhūteṣv adhokṣajam
sarva-bhūteṣu
in every living entity
adhokṣajam
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who cannot be seen or perceived with the material eyes or other material senses
bhūtaiḥ sva-dhāmabhiḥ paśyed
bhūtaiḥ
with all living entities
sva-dhāmabhiḥ
along with His Lordship’s paraphernalia
paśyet
one should see
apraviṣṭaṁ praviṣṭavat
apraviṣṭam
not entered
praviṣṭa-vat
also entered.
One should realize that in the fire, in the spiritual master, in one’s self and in all living entities — in all circumstances and conditions — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, has simultaneously entered and not entered. He is situated externally and internally as the full controller of everything.

Realization of the Supreme Personality of Godhead’s omnipresence is the perfect realization of the Absolute Truth to be attained through the study of the Vedic literatures. As stated in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.35) , aṇḍāntara-stha-paramāṇu-cayāntara-stham: the Lord is situated within the universe, within the heart of every living entity and also within the atom. We should understand that whenever the Supreme Personality of Godhead is present, He is present with all His paraphernalia, including His name, form, associates and servants. The living entity is part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and thus one should understand that since the Supreme Lord has entered the atom, the living entities are also there. One must accept the inconceivable quality of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for no one can understand from the material point of view how the Lord is all-pervasive and yet is situated in His own abode, Goloka Vṛndāvana. This realization is possible if one strictly follows the regulative principles of āśrama ( brahmacārī, gṛhastha, vānaprastha and sannyāsa ). Śrīla Madhvācārya says in this regard:

apraviṣṭaḥ sarva-gataḥ praviṣṭas tv anurūpavān evaṁ dvi-rūpo bhagavān harir eko janārdanaḥ

The Supreme Personality of Godhead, in His original form, has not entered everything ( apraviṣṭaḥ ), but in His impersonal form He has entered ( praviṣṭaḥ ). Thus He has entered and not entered simultaneously. This is also explained in Bhagavad-gītā (9.4) , wherein the Lord says:

mayā tatam idaṁ sarvaṁ jagad avyakta-mūrtinā mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni na cāhaṁ teṣv avasthitaḥ

“By Me, in My unmanifested form, this entire universe is pervaded. All beings are in Me, but I am not in them.” The Lord can defy Himself. Thus there is variety in unity ( ekatvaṁ bahutvam ).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One should see the Supreme Lord along with jīvas under his shelter in the fire, in the guru, in one's self and in all living entities. The Lord enters as the controller, though he also remains outside. One should see the Lord along with jīvas who have taken shelter of him in the fire, guru etc. The Lord enters as the controller.
Viṣṇu has simultaneously entered and not entered fire, guru, self, and all living entities. He is the controller external and internal. Recognize Him without confusing entry with identity. The presence-but-not-identity is the key.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you collapse 'God is present in everything' into 'everything is God'?
  • How does the simultaneous-entry teaching reshape your treatment of objects and beings?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.16

↗
एवं विधो ब्रह्मचारी वानप्रस्थो यतिर्गृही । चरन्विदितविज्ञान: परं ब्रह्माधिगच्छति ॥ १६ ॥
evaṁ vidho brahmacārī
[evam vidho brahmachaaree]
vānaprastho yatir gṛhī
[vaanaprastho yatir grihee]
caran vidita-vijñānaḥ
[charan vidita-vijnaanah]
paraṁ brahmādhigacchati
[param brahmaadhigachchati]
evam vidhaḥ — in this way brahmacārī — whether one is a brahmacārī vānaprasthaḥ — or one is in the vānaprastha-āśrama yatiḥ — or in the sannyāsa-āśrama gṛhī — or in the gṛhastha-āśrama caran — by practice of self-realization and understanding of the Absolute Truth vidita-vijñānaḥ — fully conversant with the science of the Absolute Truth param — the Supreme brahma — the Absolute Truth adhigacchati — one can understand.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vidho brahmacārī
evam vidhaḥ
in this way
brahmacārī
whether one is a brahmacārī
vānaprastho yatir gṛhī
vānaprasthaḥ
or one is in the vānaprastha-āśrama
yatiḥ
or in the sannyāsa-āśrama
gṛhī
or in the gṛhastha-āśrama
caran vidita-vijñānaḥ
caran
by practice of self-realization and understanding of the Absolute Truth
vidita-vijñānaḥ
fully conversant with the science of the Absolute Truth
paraṁ brahmādhigacchati
param
the Supreme
brahma
the Absolute Truth
adhigacchati
one can understand.
By practicing in this way, whether one be in the brahmacārī-āśrama, gṛhastha-āśrama, vānaprastha-āśrama or sannyāsa-āśrama, one must always realize the all-pervading presence of the Supreme Lord, for in this way it is possible to understand the Absolute Truth.

This is the beginning of self-realization. One must first understand how Brahman is present everywhere and how He is acting. This education is called brahma-jijñāsā and is the real concern of human life. Without such knowledge, one cannot claim to be a human being; rather, he remains in the animal kingdom. As it is said, sa eva go-kharaḥ: without such knowledge, one is no better than a cow or an ass.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By practicing in this way, whether one is in the brahmacārī-āśrama, gṛhastha-āśrama, vānaprastha-āśrama or sannyāsa-āśrama, attaining realization, attains the supreme Brahman.
In any āśrama — brahmacārī, gṛhastha, vānaprastha, sannyāsī — one must always realize the all-pervading presence of the Lord. This is brahma-jijñāsā, the real concern of human life. Without this inquiry, one is no better than a cow or ass.
Reflection Questions
  • How often does brahma-jijñāsā actually drive your day?
  • What would shift if real inquiry replaced even one ordinary activity weekly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.17

↗
वानप्रस्थस्य वक्ष्यामि नियमान्मुनिसम्मतान् । यानास्थाय मुनिर्गच्छेद‍ृषिलोकमुहाञ्जसा ॥ १७ ॥
vānaprasthasya vakṣyāmi
[vaanaprasthasya vakshyaami]
niyamān muni-sammatān
[niyamaan muni-sammataan]
yān āsthāya munir gacched
[yaan aasthaaya munir gachched]
ṛṣi-lokam uhāñjasā
[rishi-lokam uhaanjasaa]
vānaprasthasya — of a person in the vānaprastha-āśrama (retired life) vakṣyāmi — I shall now explain niyamān — the rules and regulations muni-sammatān — which are recognized by great munis, philosophers and saintly persons yān — which āsthāya — being situated in, or practicing muniḥ — a saintly person gacchet — is promoted ṛṣi-lokam — to the planetary system where the seers and munis go (Maharloka) uha — O King añjasā — without difficulty.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vānaprasthasya vakṣyāmi
vānaprasthasya
of a person in the vānaprastha-āśrama (retired life)
vakṣyāmi
I shall now explain
niyamān muni-sammatān
niyamān
the rules and regulations
muni-sammatān
which are recognized by great munis, philosophers and saintly persons
yān āsthāya munir gacched
yān
which
āsthāya
being situated in, or practicing
muniḥ
a saintly person
gacchet
is promoted
ṛṣi-lokam uhāñjasā
ṛṣi-lokam
to the planetary system where the seers and munis go (Maharloka)
uha
O King
añjasā
without difficulty.
O King, I shall now describe the qualifications for a vānaprastha, one who has retired from family life. By rigidly following the rules and regulations for the vānaprastha, one can easily be elevated to the upper planetary system known as Maharloka.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! I shall now describe the rules for a vānaprastha, recommended by the sages, which allow a sage to become elevated to Maharloka.
Now the qualifications of a vānaprastha. By rigid observance, one can be elevated to Maharloka. The retired-from-family stage has its own discipline and its own reward. Retirement is not coasting; it is intensification.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are you treating a 'later stage' of life as a coast rather than an intensification?
  • What discipline now would prepare you for a genuine vānaprastha later?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.18

↗
न कृष्टपच्यमश्नीयादकृष्टं चाप्यकालत: । अग्निपक्व‍मथामं वा अर्कपक्व‍मुताहरेत् ॥ १८ ॥
na kṛṣṭa-pacyam aśnīyād
[na krishta-pachyam ashneeyaad]
akṛṣṭaṁ cāpy akālataḥ
[akrishtam chaapy akaalatah]
agni-pakvam athāmaṁ vā
[agni-pakvam athaamam vaa]
arka-pakvam utāharet
[arka-pakvam utaaharet]
na — not kṛṣṭa-pacyam — grains grown by tilling of the field aśnīyāt — one should eat akṛṣṭam — grains that have grown without tilling of the field ca — and api — also akālataḥ — ripened untimely agni-pakvam — grains prepared by being cooked in fire atha — as well as āmam — mango vā — either arka-pakvam — food ripened naturally by the sunshine uta — it is so enjoined āharet — the vānaprastha should eat.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na kṛṣṭa-pacyam aśnīyād
na
not
kṛṣṭa-pacyam
grains grown by tilling of the field
aśnīyāt
one should eat
akṛṣṭaṁ cāpy akālataḥ
akṛṣṭam
grains that have grown without tilling of the field
ca
and
api
also
akālataḥ
ripened untimely
agni-pakvam athāmaṁ vā
agni-pakvam
grains prepared by being cooked in fire
atha
as well as
āmam
mango
vā
either
arka-pakvam utāharet
arka-pakvam
food ripened naturally by the sunshine
uta
it is so enjoined
āharet
the vānaprastha should eat.
A person in vānaprastha life should not eat grains grown by tilling of the fields. He should also not eat grains that have grown without tilling of the field but are not fully ripe. Nor should a vānaprastha eat grains cooked in fire. Indeed, he should eat only fruit ripened by the sunshine.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A person in vānaprastha life should not eat grains grown by tilling the fields. He should also not eat grains that have grown without tilling of the field but are not fully ripe. Nor should he eat grains cooked by fire. Indeed, he should eat only food ripened by the sunshine. Akālataḥ means unripe.
A vānaprastha does not eat tilled grains, unripe wild grains, or grains cooked in fire — only sun-ripened fruit. The diet itself becomes austere. What you eat and how it is prepared shapes the stage you can sustain.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does your diet block, rather than support, the spiritual stage you aspire to?
  • What simple food restriction would actually advance your practice?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.19

↗
वन्यैश्चरुपुरोडाशान् निर्वपेत् कालचोदितान् । लब्धे नवे नवेऽन्नाद्ये पुराणं च परित्यजेत् ॥ १९ ॥
vanyaiś caru-puroḍāśān
[vanyaish charu-purodaashaan]
nirvapet kāla-coditān
[nirvapet kaala-choditaan]
labdhe nave nave ’nnādye
[labdhe nave nave ’nnaadye]
purāṇaṁ ca parityajet
[puraanam cha parityajet]
vanyaiḥ — by fruits and grains produced in the forest without cultivation caru — grains to be offered in a fire sacrifice puroḍāśān — the cakes prepared from caru nirvapet — one should execute kāla-coditān — that which has grown naturally labdhe — on obtaining nave — new nave anna-ādye — newly produced food grains purāṇam — the stock of old grains ca — and parityajet — one should give up.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vanyaiś caru-puroḍāśān
vanyaiḥ
by fruits and grains produced in the forest without cultivation
caru
grains to be offered in a fire sacrifice
puroḍāśān
the cakes prepared from caru
nirvapet kāla-coditān
nirvapet
one should execute
kāla-coditān
that which has grown naturally
labdhe nave nave ’nnādye
labdhe
on obtaining
nave
new
nave anna-ādye
newly produced food grains
purāṇaṁ ca parityajet
purāṇam
the stock of old grains
ca
and
parityajet
one should give up.
A vānaprastha should prepare cakes to be offered in sacrifice from fruits and grains grown naturally in the forest. When he obtains some new grains, he should give up his old stock of grains.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A vānaprastha should offer cakes and caru from what is grown at that time in the forest. When he obtains some new grains, he should give up his old stock of grains. He should offer (nirvapet) cakes made of wild rice or other items from the forest (vanyaiḥ), provided at that time.
Cakes from forest fruit and grain are prepared for sacrifice; when new grains come, the old are given up. Don't hoard; let new offerings replace old supplies. Sacrifice is renewed, never stored.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'old grain' are you hoarding instead of giving up as new arrives?
  • Where could a regular 'replacement' rhythm keep your offerings fresh?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.20

↗
अग्‍न्यर्थमेव शरणमुटजं वाद्रिकन्दरम् । श्रयेत हिमवाय्वग्निवर्षार्कातपषाट्‌स्वयम् ॥ २० ॥
agny-artham eva śaraṇam
[agny-artham eva sharanam]
uṭajaṁ vādri-kandaram
[utajam vaadri-kandaram]
śrayeta hima-vāyv-agni-
[shrayeta hima-vaayv-agni-]
varṣārkātapa-ṣāṭ svayam
[varshaarkaatapa-shaat svayam]
agni — the fire artham — to keep eva — only śaraṇam — a cottage uṭa-jam — made of grass vā — or adri-kandaram — a cave in a mountain śrayeta — the vānaprastha should take shelter of hima — snow vāyu — wind agni — fire varṣa — rain arka — of the sun ātapa — shining ṣāṭ — enduring svayam — personally.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
agny-artham eva śaraṇam
agni
the fire
artham
to keep
eva
only
śaraṇam
a cottage
uṭajaṁ vādri-kandaram
uṭa-jam
made of grass
vā
or
adri-kandaram
a cave in a mountain
śrayeta hima-vāyv-agni-
śrayeta
the vānaprastha should take shelter of
hima
snow
vāyu
wind
agni
fire
varṣārkātapa-ṣāṭ svayam
varṣa
rain
arka
of the sun
ātapa
shining
ṣāṭ
enduring
svayam
personally.
A vānaprastha should prepare a thatched cottage or take shelter of a cave in a mountain only to keep the sacred fire, but he should personally practice enduring snowfall, wind, fire, rain and the shining of the sun.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A vānaprastha should prepare a thatched cottage or take shelter in a cave in a mountain only to keep the sacred fire, while enduring snowfall, wind, fire, rain and the heat of the sun. Tolerating (ṣāṭ) snow, wind, fire, rain, sunshine, he should take shelter of a cave.
A thatched hut or cave shelters the sacred fire only; the vānaprastha endures snow, wind, fire, rain, and sun on his own body. The body learns to take the weather; the fire learns shelter. Reverse the usual coddling.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you over-shelter your body while neglecting your sacred fire?
  • What single inversion of comfort could begin to recalibrate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.21

↗
केशरोमनखश्मश्रुमलानि जटिलो दधत् । कमण्डल्वजिने दण्डवल्कलाग्निपरिच्छदान् ॥ २१ ॥
keśa-roma-nakha-śmaśru-
[kesha-roma-nakha-shmashru-]
malāni jaṭilo dadhat
[malaani jatilo dadhat]
kamaṇḍalv-ajine daṇḍa-
[kamandalv-ajine danda-]
valkalāgni-paricchadān
[valkalaagni-parichchadaan]
keśa — hair on the head roma — hair on the body nakha — nails śmaśru — moustache malāni — and dirt on the body jaṭilaḥ — with matted locks of hair dadhat — one should keep kamaṇḍalu — a waterpot ajine — and a deerskin daṇḍa — rod valkala — the bark of a tree agni — fire paricchadān — garments.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
keśa-roma-nakha-śmaśru-
keśa
hair on the head
roma
hair on the body
nakha
nails
śmaśru
moustache
malāni jaṭilo dadhat
malāni
and dirt on the body
jaṭilaḥ
with matted locks of hair
dadhat
one should keep
kamaṇḍalv-ajine daṇḍa-
kamaṇḍalu
a waterpot
ajine
and a deerskin
daṇḍa
rod
valkalāgni-paricchadān
valkala
the bark of a tree
agni
fire
paricchadān
garments.
The vānaprastha should wear matted locks of hair on his head and let his body hair, nails and moustache grow. He should not cleanse his body of dirt. He should keep a waterpot, deerskin and rod, wear the bark of a tree as a covering, and use garments colored like fire.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The vānaprastha should wear matted locks of hair on his head, and his body hair, nails and moustache should remain unclean. He should keep a water pot, deerskin, rod, the bark of a tree as clothing, and sacrificial utensils. He is unclean because of not brushing teeth etc.
Matted hair, ungroomed body, no removal of dirt, waterpot, deerskin, rod, bark covering, fire-colored cloth. Outward austerity makes inward absorption visible. The form signals the stage; do not adopt it casually.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are you adopting the outer marks of a stage you have not entered inwardly?
  • What modest outward sign of your actual stage might keep you honest?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.22

↗
चरेद्वने द्वादशाब्दानष्टौ वा चतुरो मुनि: । द्वावेकं वा यथा बुद्धिर्न विपद्येत कृच्छ्रत: ॥ २२ ॥
cared vane dvādaśābdān
[chared vane dvaadashaabdaan]
aṣṭau vā caturo muniḥ
[ashtau vaa chaturo munih]
dvāv ekaṁ vā yathā buddhir
[dvaav ekam vaa yathaa buddhir]
na vipadyeta kṛcchrataḥ
[na vipadyeta krichchratah]
caret — should remain vane — in the forest dvādaśa-abdān — twelve years aṣṭau — for eight years vā — either caturaḥ — four years muniḥ — a saintly, thoughtful man dvau — two ekam — one vā — either yathā — as well as buddhiḥ — intelligence na — not vipadyeta — bewildered kṛcchrataḥ — because of hard austerities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
cared vane dvādaśābdān
caret
should remain
vane
in the forest
dvādaśa-abdān
twelve years
aṣṭau vā caturo muniḥ
aṣṭau
for eight years
vā
either
caturaḥ
four years
muniḥ
a saintly, thoughtful man
dvāv ekaṁ vā yathā buddhir
dvau
two
ekam
one
vā
either
yathā
as well as
buddhiḥ
intelligence
na vipadyeta kṛcchrataḥ
na
not
vipadyeta
bewildered
kṛcchrataḥ
because of hard austerities.
Being very thoughtful, a vānaprastha should remain in the forest for twelve years, eight years, four years, two years or at least one year. He should behave in such a way that he will not be disturbed or troubled by too much austerity.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sage should remain in the forest for twelve years, eight years, four years, two years or at least one year, such that he will not be disturbed by too much austerity.
Remain in the forest for twelve, eight, four, two, or at least one year — but do not push so hard that austerity becomes affliction. Tolerable austerity is what advances; intolerable austerity breaks. Calibrate.
Reflection Questions
  • Which austerity in your life has crossed from tolerable to afflictive?
  • How do you re-set duration so practice continues rather than collapses?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.23

↗
यदाकल्प: स्वक्रियायां व्याधिभिर्जरयाथवा । आन्वीक्षिक्यां वा विद्यायां कुर्यादनशनादिकम् ॥ २३ ॥
yadākalpaḥ sva-kriyāyāṁ
[yadaakalpah sva-kriyaayaam]
vyādhibhir jarayāthavā
[vyaadhibhir jarayaathavaa]
ānvīkṣikyāṁ vā vidyāyāṁ
[aanveekshikyaam vaa vidyaayaam]
kuryād anaśanādikam
[kuryaad anashanaadikam]
yadā — when akalpaḥ — unable to act sva-kriyāyām — in one’s own prescribed duties vyādhibhiḥ — because of disease jarayā — or because of old age athavā — either ānvīkṣikyām — in spiritual advancement vā — or vidyāyām — in the advancement of knowledge kuryāt — one must do anaśana-ādikam — not take sufficient food.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadākalpaḥ sva-kriyāyāṁ
yadā
when
akalpaḥ
unable to act
sva-kriyāyām
in one’s own prescribed duties
vyādhibhir jarayāthavā
vyādhibhiḥ
because of disease
jarayā
or because of old age
athavā
either
ānvīkṣikyāṁ vā vidyāyāṁ
ānvīkṣikyām
in spiritual advancement
vā
or
vidyāyām
in the advancement of knowledge
kuryād anaśanādikam
kuryāt
one must do
anaśana-ādikam
not take sufficient food.
When because of disease or old age one is unable to perform his prescribed duties for advancement in spiritual consciousness or study of the Vedas, he should practice fasting, not taking any food.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When, because of disease or old age, one is unable to perform his prescribed duties or practice jñāna, he should fast. When he is incapable (akalpaḥ) of practicing jñāna (ānvīkṣikyām) during the twelve year or lesser austerity, he should fast.
When disease or old age makes prescribed duties impossible, take to fasting and stop eating. There is a stage at which the body releases itself rather than be propped up. Recognize when prolongation becomes its own attachment.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you propped up something that this verse would say should be allowed to release?
  • How do you tell prolongation from attachment in serious illness or decline?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.24

↗
आत्मन्यग्नीन् समारोप्य सन्न्यस्याहं ममात्मताम् । कारणेषु न्यसेत् सम्यक्सङ्घातं तु यथार्हत: ॥ २४ ॥
ātmany agnīn samāropya
[aatmany agneen samaaropya]
sannyasyāhaṁ mamātmatām
[sannyasyaaham mamaatmataam]
kāraṇeṣu nyaset samyak
[kaaraneshu nyaset samyak]
saṅghātaṁ tu yathārhataḥ
[sanghaatam tu yathaarhatah]
ātmani — in one’s self agnīn — the fire elements within the body samāropya — properly placing sannyasya — giving up aham — false identity mama — false conception ātmatām — of the body’s being one’s self or one’s own kāraṇeṣu — in the five elements that cause the material body nyaset — one should merge samyak — completely saṅghātam — combination tu — but yathā-arhataḥ — as it befits.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ātmany agnīn samāropya
ātmani
in one’s self
agnīn
the fire elements within the body
samāropya
properly placing
sannyasyāhaṁ mamātmatām
sannyasya
giving up
aham
false identity
mama
false conception
ātmatām
of the body’s being one’s self or one’s own
kāraṇeṣu nyaset samyak
kāraṇeṣu
in the five elements that cause the material body
nyaset
one should merge
samyak
completely
saṅghātaṁ tu yathārhataḥ
saṅghātam
combination
tu
but
yathā-arhataḥ
as it befits.
He should properly place the fire element in his own self and in this way give up bodily affinity, by which one thinks the body to be one’s self or one’s own. One should gradually merge the material body into the five elements [earth, water, fire, air and sky].

The body is an effect of a cause, namely the five material elements (earth, water, fire, air and sky). In other words, one should know perfectly well that the material body is nothing but a combination of the five elements. This knowledge constitutes merging of the material body and the five material elements. Merging into Brahman in perfect knowledge means understanding perfectly that one is not the body but a spiritual soul.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He should properly place the fire element in his own self and in this way give up bodily affinity by which one thinks the body to be one's self or one's possession. He should gradually merge the material body into the five elements as far as possible. The verses till the end of the chapter describe the actions before fasting. Yathārhataḥ means as far as suitable. He should merge the body (saṁghātam) into its causes such as ether.
Place the fire element in the self; give up bodily affinity; gradually merge the material body into the five elements. The body is a combination; consciously dissolve the combination. Death is a yoga to be learned.
Reflection Questions
  • How would you train yourself now to consciously dissolve identification at death?
  • What small daily reminder of body-as-combination would steady your mind for that time?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.25

↗
खे खानि वायौ निश्वासांस्तेज:सूष्माणमात्मवान् । अप्स्वसृक्‍श्लेष्मपूयानि क्षितौ शेषं यथोद्भ‍वम् ॥ २५ ॥
khe khāni vāyau niśvāsāṁs
[khe khaani vaayau nishvaasaams]
tejaḥsūṣmāṇam ātmavān
[tejahsooshmaanam aatmavaan]
apsv asṛk-śleṣma-pūyāni
[apsv asrik-shleshma-pooyaani]
kṣitau śeṣaṁ yathodbhavam
[kshitau shesham yathodbhavam]
khe — in the sky khāni — all the holes of the body vāyau — in the air niśvāsān — all the different airs moving within the body (prāṇa, apāna, etc.) tejaḥsu — in fire uṣmāṇam — the heat of the body ātma-vān — a person who knows the self apsu — in water asṛk — blood śleṣma — mucus pūyāni — and urine kṣitau — in the earth śeṣam — the remaining (namely skin, bones and the other hard things in the body) yathā-udbhavam — wherefrom all of them grew.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
khe khāni vāyau niśvāsāṁs
khe
in the sky
khāni
all the holes of the body
vāyau
in the air
niśvāsān
all the different airs moving within the body (prāṇa, apāna, etc.)
tejaḥsūṣmāṇam ātmavān
tejaḥsu
in fire
uṣmāṇam
the heat of the body
ātma-vān
a person who knows the self
apsv asṛk-śleṣma-pūyāni
apsu
in water
asṛk
blood
śleṣma
mucus
pūyāni
and urine
kṣitau śeṣaṁ yathodbhavam
kṣitau
in the earth
śeṣam
the remaining (namely skin, bones and the other hard things in the body)
yathā-udbhavam
wherefrom all of them grew.
A sober, self-realized person who has full knowledge should merge the various parts of the body in their original sources. The holes in the body are caused by the sky, the process of breathing is caused by the air, the heat of the body is caused by fire, and semen, blood and mucus are caused by water. The hard substances, like skin, muscle and bone, are caused by earth. In this way all the constituents of the body are caused by various elements, and they should be merged again into those elements.

To be self-realized, one must understand the original sources of the various elements of the body. The body is a combination of skin, bone, muscle, blood, semen, urine, stool, heat, breath and so on, which all come from earth, water, fire, air and sky. One must be well conversant with the sources of all the bodily constituents. Then one becomes a self-realized person, or ātmavān, one who knows the self.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He should merge the holes in the body into the ether, breathing into air, the heat of the body into fire, and semen, blood, mucus and urine into water. He should merge the remainder, such as skin, muscle and bone, into earth. They are merged into their sources. The sentence is connected with the previous verse. He should merge the holes of the body into ether. Śeṣam means hard substances like bone and flesh.
Merge holes into sky, breath into air, heat into fire, semen/blood/mucus into water, hard substances into earth. The body returns piece by piece to its sources. Self-realization knows the original sources of each constituent.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of your body do you experience as 'borrowed from elements' versus 'mine'?
  • What contemplation could deepen the experience of elemental return?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.26-28

↗
वाचमग्नौ सवक्तव्यामिन्द्रे शिल्पं करावपि । पदानि गत्या वयसि रत्योपस्थं प्रजापतौ ॥ २६ ॥ मृत्यौ पायुं विसर्गं च यथास्थानं विनिर्दिशेत् । दिक्षु श्रोत्रं सनादेन स्पर्शेनाध्यात्मनि त्वचम् ॥ २७ ॥ रूपाणि चक्षुषा राजन् ज्योतिष्यभिनिवेशयेत् । अप्सु प्रचेतसा जिह्वां घ्रेयैर्घ्राणं क्षितौ न्यसेत् ॥ २८ ॥
vācam agnau savaktavyām
[vaacham agnau savaktavyaam]
indre śilpaṁ karāv api
[indre shilpam karaav api]
padāni gatyā vayasi
[padaani gatyaa vayasi]
ratyopasthaṁ prajāpatau
[ratyopastham prajaapatau]
mṛtyau pāyuṁ visargaṁ ca
[mrityau paayum visargam cha]
yathā-sthānaṁ vinirdiśet
[yathaa-sthaanam vinirdishet]
dikṣu śrotraṁ sa-nādena
[dikshu shrotram sa-naadena]
sparśenādhyātmani tvacam
[sparshenaadhyaatmani tvacham]
rūpāṇi cakṣuṣā rājan
[roopaani chakshushaa raajan]
jyotiṣy abhiniveśayet
[jyotishy abhiniveshayet]
apsu pracetasā jihvāṁ
[apsu prachetasaa jihvaam]
ghreyair ghrāṇaṁ kṣitau nyaset
[ghreyair ghraanam kshitau nyaset]
vācam — speech agnau — in the fire-god (the personified god controlling fire) sa-vaktavyām — with the subject matter of speaking indre — unto King Indra śilpam — craftsmanship or the capacity to work with the hands karau — as well as the hands api — indeed padāni — the legs gatyā — with the power to move vayasi — unto Lord Viṣṇu ratyā — sexual desire upastham — with the genitals prajāpatau — unto Prajāpati mṛtyau — unto the demigod known as Mṛtyu pāyum — the rectum visargam — with its activity, evacuation ca — also yathā-sthānam — in the proper place vinirdiśet — one should indicate dikṣu — unto different directions śrotram — the aural sense sa-nādena — with sound vibration sparśena — with touch adhyātmani — unto the wind-god tvacam — the sense of touch rūpāṇi — form cakṣuṣā — with eyesight rājan — O King jyotiṣi — in the sun abhiniveśayet — one should endow apsu — unto water pracetasā — with the demigod known as Varuṇa jihvām — the tongue ghreyaiḥ — with the object of smell ghrāṇam — the power to smell kṣitau — in the earth nyaset — one should give.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vācam agnau savaktavyām
vācam
speech
agnau
in the fire-god (the personified god controlling fire)
sa-vaktavyām
with the subject matter of speaking
indre śilpaṁ karāv api
indre
unto King Indra
śilpam
craftsmanship or the capacity to work with the hands
karau
as well as the hands
api
indeed
padāni gatyā vayasi
padāni
the legs
gatyā
with the power to move
vayasi
unto Lord Viṣṇu
ratyopasthaṁ prajāpatau
ratyā
sexual desire
mṛtyau pāyuṁ visargaṁ ca
upastham
with the genitals
yathā-sthānaṁ vinirdiśet
dikṣu śrotraṁ sa-nādena
sparśenādhyātmani tvacam
rūpāṇi cakṣuṣā rājan
jyotiṣy abhiniveśayet
apsu pracetasā jihvāṁ
prajāpatau
unto Prajāpati
mṛtyau
unto the demigod known as Mṛtyu
pāyum
the rectum
visargam
with its activity, evacuation
ca
also
ghreyair ghrāṇaṁ kṣitau nyaset
yathā-sthānam
in the proper place
vinirdiśet
one should indicate
dikṣu
unto different directions
śrotram
the aural sense
sa-nādena
with sound vibration
sparśena
with touch
adhyātmani
unto the wind-god
tvacam
the sense of touch
rūpāṇi
form
cakṣuṣā
with eyesight
rājan
O King
jyotiṣi
in the sun
abhiniveśayet
one should endow
apsu
unto water
pracetasā
with the demigod known as Varuṇa
jihvām
the tongue
ghreyaiḥ
with the object of smell
ghrāṇam
the power to smell
kṣitau
in the earth
nyaset
one should give.
Thereafter, the object of speech, along with the sense of speech [the tongue], should be bestowed upon fire. Craftsmanship and the two hands should be given to the demigod Indra. The power of movement and the legs should be given to Lord Viṣṇu. Sensual pleasure, along with the genitals, should be bestowed upon Prajāpati. The rectum, with the power of evacuation, should be bestowed, in its proper place, unto Mṛtyu. The aural instrument, along with sound vibration, should be given to the deities presiding over the directions. The instrument of touch, along with the sense objects of touch, should be given to Vāyu. Form, with the power of sight, should be bestowed upon the sun. The tongue, along with the demigod Varuṇa, should be bestowed upon water, and the power of smell, along with the two Aśvinī-kumāra demigods, should be bestowed upon the earth.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He should merge the object of speech, along with the voice, into fire and should merge craftsmanship and the two hands into Indra. He should merge the power of movement and the legs into Viṣṇu. He should merge sensual pleasure, along with the genitals, into Prajāpati. He should merge the rectum, with the power of evacuation, into Mṛtyu. He should merge the ear along with sound into the deities presiding over the directions. He should merge the skin along with the sense object called touch into Vāyu. He should merge the eye and form into the sun. He should merge the tongue, along with taste into Varuṇa, and the nose along with smell, into the Aśvinī-kumāras. Having explained merging of the gross body, he explains merging of the subtle body (composed of sense objects, senses and devatās). The senses and the sense objects are merged into the devatās of the senses. Vayasi means “into Viṣṇu.” First voice is merged into Agni. The verb “should merge” is understood for all the sentences. Yathā-sthānam means “each item will be listed in sequence without missing any of them.” Sa nādena means “the jñānī merges the ear along with sound into the deities of the directions.” Touch and skin are merged into Vayu (adhyātmani). Eye and form are merged into the sun (jyotiṣi). He merges tastes such as sweetness (pracetasā—where there is excellent consciousness) along with the tongue into Varuṇa (apsu). He merges the nose along with smell into the Āśvini-kumāras (kṣitau) who are the presiding deities of the earth.
Tongue to fire, hands to Indra, legs to Viṣṇu, genitals to Prajāpati, anus to Mṛtyu, ears to direction-deities, touch to Vāyu, sight to sun, taste to Varuṇa, smell to Aśvinīs. Every sense and organ has its source-deity to return to. The body is on loan from many sources.
Reflection Questions
  • Which sense are you most identified with, and to which deity does this verse return it?
  • What does it mean to handle a faculty as borrowed, not owned?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.29-30

↗
मनो मनोरथैश्चन्द्रे बुद्धिं बोध्यै: कवौ परे । कर्माण्यध्यात्मना रुद्रे यदहं ममताक्रिया । सत्त्वेन चित्तं क्षेत्रज्ञे गुणैर्वैकारिकं परे ॥ २९ ॥ अप्सु क्षितिमपो ज्योतिष्यदो वायौ नभस्यमुम् । कूटस्थे तच्च महति तदव्यक्तेऽक्षरे च तत् ॥ ३० ॥
mano manorathaiś candre
[mano manorathaish chandre]
buddhiṁ bodhyaiḥ kavau pare
[buddhim bodhyaih kavau pare]
karmāṇy adhyātmanā rudre
[karmaany adhyaatmanaa rudre]
yad-aham mamatā-kriyā
[yad-aham mamataa-kriyaa]
sattvena cittaṁ kṣetra-jñe
[sattvena chittam kshetra-jne]
guṇair vaikārikaṁ pare
[gunair vaikaarikam pare]
apsu kṣitim apo jyotiṣy
[apsu kshitim apo jyotishy]
ado vāyau nabhasy amum
[ado vaayau nabhasy amum]
kūṭasthe tac ca mahati
[kootasthe tach cha mahati]
tad avyakte ’kṣare ca tat
[tad avyakte ’kshare cha tat]
manaḥ — the mind manorathaiḥ — along with material desires candre — unto Candra, the moon demigod buddhim — intelligence bodhyaiḥ — with the subject matter of intelligence kavau pare — unto the supreme learned person, Lord Brahmā karmāṇi — material activities adhyātmanā — with false ego rudre — unto Lord Śiva (Rudra) yat — wherein aham — I am the material body mamatā — everything belonging to the material body is mine kriyā — such activities sattvena — along with the existential conception cittam — consciousness kṣetra-jñe — unto the individual soul guṇaiḥ — along with the material activities conducted by the material qualities vaikārikam — the living entities under the influence of the material modes pare — in the Supreme Being apsu — in the water kṣitim — the earth apaḥ — the water jyotiṣi — in the luminaries, specifically in the sun adaḥ — brightness vāyau — in the air nabhasi — in the sky amum — that kūṭasthe — in the materialistic conception of life tat — that ca — also mahati — in the mahat-tattva, the total material energy tat — that avyakte — in the nonmanifested akṣare — in the Supersoul ca — also tat — that.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mano manorathaiś candre
manaḥ
the mind
manorathaiḥ
along with material desires
candre
unto Candra, the moon demigod
buddhiṁ bodhyaiḥ kavau pare
buddhim
intelligence
bodhyaiḥ
with the subject matter of intelligence
kavau pare
unto the supreme learned person, Lord Brahmā
karmāṇy adhyātmanā rudre
karmāṇi
material activities
adhyātmanā
with false ego
rudre
unto Lord Śiva (Rudra)
yad-aham mamatā-kriyā
yat
wherein
aham
I am the material body
mamatā
everything belonging to the material body is mine
kriyā
such activities
sattvena cittaṁ kṣetra-jñe
sattvena
along with the existential conception
cittam
consciousness
kṣetra-jñe
unto the individual soul
guṇair vaikārikaṁ pare
guṇaiḥ
along with the material activities conducted by the material qualities
vaikārikam
the living entities under the influence of the material modes
pare
in the Supreme Being
apsu kṣitim apo jyotiṣy
apsu
in the water
kṣitim
the earth
apaḥ
the water
jyotiṣi
in the luminaries, specifically in the sun
ado vāyau nabhasy amum
adaḥ
brightness
vāyau
in the air
nabhasi
in the sky
amum
that
kūṭasthe tac ca mahati
kūṭasthe
in the materialistic conception of life
tat
that
ca
also
mahati
in the mahat-tattva, the total material energy
tad avyakte ’kṣare ca tat
tat
that
avyakte
in the nonmanifested
akṣare
in the Supersoul
ca
also
tat
that.
The mind, along with all material desires, should be merged in the moon demigod. All the subject matters of intelligence, along with the intelligence itself, should be placed in Lord Brahmā. False ego, which is under the influence of the material modes of nature and which induces one to think, “I am this body, and everything connected with this body is mine,” should be merged, along with material activities, in Rudra, the predominating deity of false ego. Material consciousness, along with the goal of thought, should be merged in the individual living being, and the demigods acting under the modes of material nature should be merged, along with the perverted living being, into the Supreme Being. The earth should be merged in water, water in the brightness of the sun, this brightness into the air, the air into the sky, the sky into the false ego, the false ego into the total material energy, the total material energy into the unmanifested ingredients [the pradhāna feature of the material energy], and at last the ingredient feature of material manifestation into the Supersoul.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He should merge the mind along with all material desires into the moon god. He should merge intelligence along with its objects into Lord Brahmā. He should merge false ego along with material activities into Rudra, since actions are preceded by the false identity of me and mine. He should merge citta along with consciousness into Vāsudeva, the presiding deity of citta. He should merge the jīva along with the devatās (guṇaiḥ) into the Brahman (pare). He should merge earth into water, water into fire, fire into air, air into ether, and ether into ahaṅkāra. He should merge ahaṅkāra into mahat-tattva, mahat-tattva into pradhāna and pradhāna into Paramātmā. He merges the mind, along with all material desires, into moon god. He merges intelligence, along with its objects, into Lord Brahmā. He merges false ego, along with material activities, into Rudra, since actions are preceded by false identity of me and mine. He should merge citta along with consciousness (sattvena) into Vāsudeva, the presiding deity of citta. He should merge the jīva (vaikārikam) along with the devatās (guṇaiḥ) into the Brahman (pare). The devatās, except for Vāsudeva, are products of the guṇas. Thus Vāsudeva does not merge into Brahman. “How does non-dual Brahman exist, since earth and other material elements still exist?” These will also be merged. Thus earth merges into water, and water merges into fire. He merges fire (adaḥ) into air. He merges air (amum) into ether. He merges ether into ahaṅkāra (kūṭaṣthe), and merges ahaṅkāra into mahat-tattva. He merges mahat-tattva into pradhāna. He merges pradhāna into Paramātmā.
Mind to moon, intelligence to Brahmā, false ego (and 'I am this body') to Rudra, consciousness to the individual living being, demigods to the Supreme Being; earth to water, water to fire, fire to air, air to sky, sky to false ego, all into the unmanifested, finally into the Supersoul. A full unwinding.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in your daily mind do these layers — moon, Brahmā, Rudra — already feel reachable as references?
  • How might this map become an actual contemplation, not just a list?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.12.31

↗
इत्यक्षरतयात्मानं चिन्मात्रमवशेषितम् । ज्ञात्वाद्वयोऽथ विरमेद् दग्धयोनिरिवानल: ॥ ३१ ॥
ity akṣaratayātmānaṁ
[ity aksharatayaatmaanam]
cin-mātram avaśeṣitam
[chin-maatram avasheshitam]
jñātvādvayo ’tha viramed
[jnaatvaadvayo ’tha viramed]
dagdha-yonir ivānalaḥ
[dagdha-yonir ivaanalah]
iti — thus akṣaratayā — because of being spiritual ātmānam — oneself (the individual soul) cit-mātram — completely spiritual avaśeṣitam — the remaining balance (after the material elements are merged, one after another, into the original Supersoul) jñātvā — understanding advayaḥ — without differentiation, or of the same quality as the Paramātmā atha — thus viramet — one should cease from material existence dagdha-yoniḥ — whose source (the wood) has burnt up iva — like analaḥ — flames.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity akṣaratayātmānaṁ
iti
thus
akṣaratayā
because of being spiritual
ātmānam
oneself (the individual soul)
cin-mātram avaśeṣitam
cit-mātram
completely spiritual
avaśeṣitam
the remaining balance (after the material elements are merged, one after another, into the original Supersoul)
jñātvādvayo ’tha viramed
jñātvā
understanding
advayaḥ
without differentiation, or of the same quality as the Paramātmā
atha
thus
viramet
one should cease from material existence
dagdha-yonir ivānalaḥ
dagdha-yoniḥ
whose source (the wood) has burnt up
iva
like
analaḥ
flames.
When all the material designations have thus merged into their respective material elements, the living beings, who are all ultimately completely spiritual, being one in quality with the Supreme Being, should cease from material existence, as flames cease when the wood in which they are burning is consumed. When the material body is returned to its various material elements, only the spiritual being remains. This spiritual being is Brahman and is equal in quality with Parabrahman.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Seventh Canto, Twelfth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Perfect Society: Four Spiritual Classes.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understanding the ātmā-- which is pure consciousness and which remains after merging all the elements-- to be indestructible and beyond material duality, he gives up material existence, like fire whose wood has been burned away. Thus ends the commentary on the Twelfth Chapter of the Seventh Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Thirteen The Conduct of the Sannyāsī 7.13: The Behavior of a Perfect Person 13. The Behavior of a Perfect Person 7.13 Summary This Thirteenth Chapter describes the regulative principles for sannyāsīs and also describes the history of an avadhūta. It concludes with a description of perfection for the student in spiritual advancement. Śrī Nārada Muni has been describing the symptoms of various āśramas and varṇas. Now, in this chapter, he specifically describes the regulative principles to be followed by sannyāsīs. After retiring from family life, one should accept the status of vānaprastha, in which he must formally accept the body as his means of existence but gradually forget the bodily necessities of life. After vānaprastha life, having left home, one should travel to different places as a sannyāsī. Without bodily comforts and free from dependence on anyone with respect to bodily necessities, one should travel everywhere, wearing almost nothing or actually walking naked. Without association with ordinary human society, one should beg alms and always be satisfied in himself. One should be a friend to every living entity and be very peaceful in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. A sannyāsī should travel alone in this way, not caring for life or death, waiting for the time when he will leave his material body. He should not indulge in unnecessary books or adopt professions like astrology, nor should he try to become a great orator. He should also give up the path of unnecessary argument and should not depend on anyone under any circumstances. He should not try to allure people into becoming his disciples just so that the number of his disciples may increase. He should give up the habit of reading many books as a means of livelihood, and he should not attempt to increase the number of temples and maṭhas, or monasteries. When a sannyāsī thus becomes completely independent, peaceful and equipoised, he can select the destination he desires after death and follow the principles by which to reach that destination. Although fully learned, he should always remain silent, like a dumb person, and travel like a restless child. In this regard, Nārada Muni described a meeting between Prahlāda and a saintly person who had adopted the mode of life of a python. In this way he described the symptoms of a paramahaṁsa. A person who has attained the paramahaṁsa stage knows very well the distinction between matter and spirit. He is not at all interested in gratifying the material senses, for he is always deriving pleasure from devotional service to the Lord. He is not very anxious to protect his material body. Being satisfied with whatever he attains by the grace of the Lord, he is completely independent of material happiness and distress, and thus he is transcendental to all regulative principles. Sometimes he accepts severe austerities, and sometimes he accepts material opulence. His only concern is to satisfy Kṛṣṇa, and for that purpose he can do anything and everything, without reference to the regulative principles. He is never to be equated with materialistic men, nor is he subject to the judgments of such men.
When all designations merge back into their elements, the living being — spiritual and one in quality with Parabrahman — ceases from material existence as a flame ceases when its wood is consumed. The spiritual remains; Brahman remains; Parabrahman is unchanged.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'designations' of yours are still feeding the wood of material existence?
  • Where could you let one designation merge back into its source this week?
📝 My note