FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

1.19 · The Appearance of Śukadeva Gosvāmī

39 verses · 🖨 Class prep
P Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (11080 chars)

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) When Maharaja Pariksit was cursed by the brahmana boy, Srngi, it was a transcendental ‘slap’ orchestrated by the will of providence. Though a pure devotee, Maharaja Pariksit was nevertheless placed in a situation where his surrender and devotion became shiningly evident to all. Following in the footsteps of the great King, every individual should learn the art of unhesitatingly embracing the inconceivable plans of Krishna, which sometimes come as quite a shock. Maharaja Pariksit was handed the notice of seven days to live, but our time may be even shorter.

Previous Back to Godhead Next Pariksit’s Rule Last updated 1 year ago

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19)

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) When Maharaja Pariksit was cursed by the brahmana boy, Srngi, it was a transcendental ‘slap’ orchestrated by the will of providence. Though a pure devotee, Maharaja Pariksit was nevertheless placed in a situation where his surrender and devotion became shiningly evident to all. Following in the footsteps of the great King, every individual should learn the art of unhesitatingly embracing the inconceivable plans of Krishna, which sometimes come as quite a shock. Maharaja Pariksit was handed the notice of seven days to live, but our time may be even shorter.

Previous Back to Godhead Next Pariksit’s Rule Last updated 1 year ago

Navigating Life

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Navigating Life “But by the will of the Lord, the circumstances were so created that they became ways to the King’s becoming unattached to family connection and governmental activities and thus becoming a completely surrendered soul unto the lotus feet of Lord Krishna. The merciful Lord sometimes creates such awkward positions for his pure devotees in order to drag them towards Himself from the mire of material existence. But outwardly the situations appear to be frustrating to the devotees. The devotees of the Lord are always under the protection of the Lord, and in any condition, frustration or success, the Lord is the supreme guide for the devotees. The pure devotees, therefore, accept all conditions of frustration as blessings from the Lord.” (SB 1.18.28) From the moment he was saved by Krishna in the womb of his mother, Maharaja Pariksit’s inner longing was to find his Lord again. His life was wonderful in its birth, wonderful in its duration and wonderful in its completion. Perhaps the most wonderful aspect of his life, however, was his response to the unexpected news of his own death. Once, when asked how we should react to life’s challenges, a teacher told his student to bring a cup of boiling water, a potato, some cotton wool and a bottle of herbs. The teacher first placed the potato into the cup. A few moments later the hard potato crumbled: “Some people become emotional wrecks and fall apart in difficult times – don’t be like this” he said. Next, the cotton wool was dipped into the boiling water. After a few minutes, the soft substance became shrunken, solid and impenetrable: “Other people become hard-hearted and emotionally disconnected – don’t be like this” he said. The herbs were then thrown in. Almost instantaneously, a wonderful aroma emanated from the cup: “Unique individuals use life’s challenges to bring out their best – be like this!” he concluded. It was a graphic teaching. Srila Prabhupada regularly quoted a famous prayer of Lord Brahma, reminding his students of how they should navigate the rocky road of the material world: “My dear Lord, one who earnestly waits for You to bestow Your causeless mercy upon him, all the while patiently suffering the reactions of his past misdeeds and offering You respectful obeisances with his heart, words and body, is surely eligible for liberation, for it has become his rightful claim.” ( SB 10.14.8 ) In this beautiful verse recited by Lord Brahma, we gain a deep insight into how one should deal with the inevitable reversals of life. Life has its way of rudely ejecting us from our comfortable position at any moment. Change is unstoppable (cannot be checked), uncontrollable (could occur in any way) and unpredictable (could happen at any time). How do we navigate the course of life, especially when it’s riddled with surprises beyond our control? Here are three dictums for your daily deliberation:

Adjust your expectation – Maharaja Pariksit, who wisely understood the ways of the world, was not shocked by reversals. False expectation brings great frustration. We’re not designed to control the world so we shouldn’t be surprised when things don’t go to plan. The famous saying reminds us that if something can go wrong, it will – expect the unexpected. Disempowering? Not really, since the good news is that happiness is not outside of us. Contentment in life is not based on controlling the external world, but rather on conquering the inner world. We need not seek perfect situations, but rather cultivate perfect consciousness.

Accept your situation –rather than lamenting his impending death, Maharaja Pariksit graciously appreciated and utilised the seven days he would live for. Every external situation can create incredible internal growth. Properly digested experiences will nourish us with strength, wisdom, humility and powerful insight. The unexpected occurrences are part of a master plan to reconfigure our consciousness. We must learn acceptance and stop fighting, denying or cursing a situation. Our gut reaction is to blame others, blame the stars, blame the government or blame God. In the blame game, however, we end up staying the same. Karmic reactions are meant to mold us into the best versions of ourselves.

Aspire for connection – turning the high seat of the kingdom over to his son, bidding his family farewell and renouncing all royal paraphernalia, Maharaja Pariksit journeyed to the bank of the Ganges with a vow to fast until death and focus his mind on God. In this acute situation, he intensified his spiritual immersion. Amidst the unpredictable rollercoaster of life, we need a permanent anchor. As we commit to spiritual practices and root ourselves in the transcendental reality, we learn to see all the challenges of life on the backdrop of eternity. Everything comes back into perspective. Come what may, success or failure, praise or blame, highs or lows, our spiritual status remains unharmed and untouched. This connection is known as yoga, a process that reconnects us to the spiritual reality.

Let the mantra become part of you: adjust your expectation, accept your situation and aspire for connection.

Previous Pariksit Retires and Sukadeva Enters Next C.U.T Last updated 1 year ago

Pariksit and Kali

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Pariksit and Kali Chapter 16, 17 On his travels, Maharaja Pariksit encountered a terrified bull (the personification of dharma ), who was bereft of three legs. The bull was speaking to a cow (the personification of bhumi , Mother Earth), who was grieving after Krishna’s departure and lamenting the subsequent degradation in the kingdom. They had been mercilessly attacked by Kali, the agent of darkness. Seeing their pitiable condition, Maharaja Pariksit pacified them and vowed to address the injustice that had occurred. When the King furiously approached Kali and prepared to slay him, the agent of darkness displayed repentance and surrender. Bound by kingly principles, the righteous Maharaja Pariksit refrained from annihilating Kali, and instead awarded him four specific places to reside – where there is meat-eating, intoxication, gambling and illicit sex (and in addition, any place where gold is hoarded). The King then re-established the lost legs of religion and revived the sanctity of the kingdom.

Previous Pariksit’s Rule Next Pariksit Cursed Last updated 1 year ago

Pariksit Cursed

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Pariksit Cursed Chapter 18 Suta Goswami next addresses the fourth question, regarding the renunciation of Maharaja Pariksit and his travelling to the Ganges. Once, while on a hunting expedition, Maharaja Pariksit felt fatigued, hungry and thirsty. He arrived at the hermitage of Samika Rishi, and when he entered, observed the sage sitting with closed eyes. When Maharaja Pariksit requested some water, the sage, completely absorbed in spiritual trance, failed to respond. Feeling insulted, Maharaja Pariksit picked up a lifeless snake with his bow and angrily placed it on the shoulder of the sage. Since Maharaja Pariksit was an advanced devotee who had control over his mind and senses, his uncharacteristically harsh reaction was clearly the arrangement of the Lord. When Srngi, the sage’s son, heard of this, he condemned the King as an upstart and impulsively cursed him: “On the seventh day from today a snake-bird will bite the most wretched one of that dynasty [Maharaja Pariksit].” When he found out, Samika Rishi deeply regretted the impetuous reaction of his proud son and prayed to the Lord for forgiveness.

Previous Pariksit and Kali Next Pariksit Retires and Sukadeva Enters Last updated 1 year ago

Pariksit Retires and Sukadeva Enters

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Pariksit Retires and Sukadeva Enters Chapter 19 Upon hearing of the curse, Maharaja Pariksit, who remained unfazed and equipoised, graciously embraced the news of his imminent death and detached himself from the world. He humbly accepted his mistake and proceeded to the bank of the Ganges, where he sat in meditation with a vow to fast until death. Sages gathered there under the pretence of pilgrimage, though in actuality they could foresee that a historic spiritual dialogue would ensue. They sat in anticipation and vowed to exclusively discuss spiritual topics until Maharaja Pariksit’s last breath. At that time, Sukadeva Goswami, the powerful son of Vyasadeva, appeared. Though only sixteen years old, he was completely disinterested in material life and commanded the respect of a spiritual giant. He accepted the exalted seat of honour, ready to answer any question posed. Maharaja Pariksit stepped forward, expressed his great fortune and offered heartfelt prayers to Sukadeva Goswami. Acutely aware of his impending death, the King begged for guidance at this most crucial time, confronted with the final exam of life. “I have only seven days to live” the King said. “What should I do?”

Previous Pariksit Cursed Next Navigating Life Last updated 1 year ago

Pariksit’s Rule

P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Pariksit’s Rule Chapter 16 Having narrated the events leading to Maharaja Pariksit’s coronation, Suta Goswami next described the intriguing story of the King’s life. Maharaja Pariksit governed the land as an ideal King, married Iravati (the daughter of King Uttara), begot four children, and performed auspicious sacrifices under the guidance of the family brahmana , Kripacarya. When the King observed the inauspicious effects of Kali entering his kingdom, he fearlessly seized his weapons and set out to counteract the evil influence.

Previous P - Pariksit Punished (16-19) Next Pariksit and Kali Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.1

↗
सूत उवाच महीपतिस्त्वथ तत्कर्म गर्ह्यं विचिन्तयन्नात्मकृतं सुदुर्मना: । अहो मया नीचमनार्यवत्कृतं निरागसि ब्रह्मणि गूढतेजसि ॥ १ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
mahī-patis tv atha tat-karma garhyaṁ
[mahee-patis tv atha tat-karma garhyam]
vicintayann ātma-kṛtaṁ sudurmanāḥ
[vichintayann aatma-kritam sudurmanaah]
aho mayā nīcam anārya-vat kṛtaṁ
[aho mayaa neecham anaarya-vat kritam]
nirāgasi brahmaṇi gūḍha-tejasi
[niraagasi brahmani goodha-tejasi]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta Gosvāmī said mahī-patiḥ — the King tu — but atha — thus (while coming back home) tat — that karma — act garhyam — abominable vicintayan — thus thinking ātma-kṛtam — done by himself su-durmanāḥ — very much depressed aho — alas mayā — by me nīcam — heinous anārya — uncivilized vat — like kṛtam — done nirāgasi — unto one who is faultless brahmaṇi — unto a brāhmaṇa gūḍha — grave tejasi — unto the powerful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta Gosvāmī said
mahī-patis tv atha tat-karma garhyaṁ
mahī-patiḥ
the King
tu
but
atha
thus (while coming back home)
tat
that
karma
act
garhyam
abominable
vicintayann ātma-kṛtaṁ sudurmanāḥ
vicintayan
thus thinking
ātma-kṛtam
done by himself
su-durmanāḥ
very much depressed
aho
alas
aho mayā nīcam anārya-vat kṛtaṁ
mayā
by me
nīcam
heinous
anārya
uncivilized
vat
like
kṛtam
done
nirāgasi brahmaṇi gūḍha-tejasi
nirāgasi
unto one who is faultless
brahmaṇi
unto a brāhmaṇa
gūḍha
grave
tejasi
unto the powerful.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: While returning home, the King [Mahārāja Parīkṣit] felt that the act he had committed against the faultless and powerful brāhmaṇa was heinous and uncivilized. Consequently he was distressed.

The pious King regretted his accidental improper treatment of the powerful brāhmaṇa, who was faultless. Such repentance is natural for a good man like the King, and such repentance delivers a devotee from all kinds of sins accidentally committed. The devotees are naturally faultless. Accidental sins committed by a devotee are sincerely regretted, and by the grace of the Lord all sins unwillingly committed by a devotee are burnt in the fire of repentance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: The King, reflecting that his act was reprehensible, became very depressed. I have performed a deplorable act like an uncivilized person towards an innocent brāhmaṇa with great power.
Commentary

In the nineteenth chapter, Parīkṣit repents for his act, renounces the kingdom, fasts till death, and Śukadeva arrives in the assembly of great sages.

When he returned home, he became sad. His thoughts are described in two and half verses. I have done a deplorable act (nīcam). Sometimes the word amīvam (sin) is seen instead. Brahmaṇi means brāhmaṇe.

Returning home, Parīkṣit felt that the act he had committed against the faultless brāhmaṇa was heinous and uncivilized. The conscience of a good king is severe with himself. Self-judgment is its own purification.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could harder self-judgment be the start of repair?
  • What 'heinous' framing of my own act would I avoid out of self-protection?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.2

↗
ध्रुवं ततो मे कृतदेवहेलनाद् दुरत्ययं व्यसनं नातिदीर्घात् । तदस्तु कामं ह्यघनिष्कृताय मे यथा न कुर्यां पुनरेवमद्धा ॥ २ ॥
dhruvaṁ tato me kṛta-deva-helanād
[dhruvam tato me krita-deva-helanaad]
duratyayaṁ vyasanaṁ nāti-dīrghāt
[duratyayam vyasanam naati-deerghaat]
tad astu kāmaṁ hy agha-niṣkṛtāya me
[tad astu kaamam hy agha-nishkritaaya me]
yathā na kuryāṁ punar evam addhā
[yathaa na kuryaam punar evam addhaa]
dhruvam — sure and certain tataḥ — therefore me — my kṛta-deva-helanāt — because of disobeying the orders of the Lord duratyayam — very difficult vyasanam — calamity na — not ati — greatly dīrghāt — far off tat — that astu — let it be kāmam — desire without reservations hi — certainly agha — sins niṣkṛtāya — for getting free me — my yathā — so that na — never kuryām — shall I do it punaḥ — again evam — as I have done addhā — directly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhruvaṁ tato me kṛta-deva-helanād
dhruvam
sure and certain
tataḥ
therefore
me
my
kṛta-deva-helanāt
because of disobeying the orders of the Lord
duratyayaṁ vyasanaṁ nāti-dīrghāt
duratyayam
very difficult
vyasanam
calamity
na
not
ati
greatly
dīrghāt
far off
tad astu kāmaṁ hy agha-niṣkṛtāya me
tat
that
astu
let it be
kāmam
desire without reservations
hi
certainly
agha
sins
niṣkṛtāya
for getting free
me
my
yathā na kuryāṁ punar evam addhā
yathā
so that
na
never
kuryām
shall I do it
punaḥ
again
evam
as I have done
addhā
directly.
[King Parīkṣit thought:] Due to my neglecting the injunctions of the Supreme Lord I must certainly expect some difficulty to overcome me in the near future. I now desire without reservation that the calamity come now, for in this way I may be freed of the sinful action and not commit such an offense again.

The Supreme Lord enjoins that brāhmaṇas and cows must be given all protection. The Lord is Himself very much inclined to do good to brāhmaṇas and cows ( go-brāhmaṇa-hitāya ca ). Mahārāja Parīkṣit knew all this, and thus he concluded that his insulting a powerful brāhmaṇa was certainly to be punished by the laws of the Lord, and he was expecting something very difficult in the very near future. He therefore desired the imminent calamity to fall on him and not on his family members. A man’s personal misconduct affects all his family members. Therefore Mahārāja Parīkṣit desired the calamity to fall on him alone. By suffering personally he would be restrained from future sins, and at the same time the sin which he had committed would be counteracted so that his descendants would not suffer. That is the way a responsible devotee thinks. The family members of a devotee also share the effects of a devotee’s service unto the Lord. Mahārāja Prahlāda saved his demon father by his personal devotional service. A devotee son in the family is the greatest boon or blessing of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of my disrespect for this godly person it is certain that unpreventable misfortune will come very soon. Let that be direct atonement for my sin in full force, so that I will not commit such an act again.
Commentary

It (the misfortune) should affect me directly (addhā), not my sons and others.

Parīkṣit thought: due to my neglect of the Lord's injunctions some difficulty must come. I desire it without reservation, for it may free me from such acts. Welcoming consequence is a high spiritual posture.
Reflection Questions
  • What consequence could I welcome instead of dodge?
  • Where would full acceptance of result accelerate my freedom?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.3

↗
अद्यैव राज्यं बलमृद्धकोशं प्रकोपितब्रह्मकुलानलो मे । दहत्वभद्रस्य पुनर्न मेऽभूत् पापीयसी धीर्द्विजदेवगोभ्य: ॥ ३ ॥
adyaiva rājyaṁ balam ṛddha-kośaṁ
[adyaiva raajyam balam riddha-kosham]
prakopita-brahma-kulānalo me
[prakopita-brahma-kulaanalo me]
dahatv abhadrasya punar na me ’bhūt
[dahatv abhadrasya punar na me ’bhoot]
pāpīyasī dhīr dvija-deva-gobhyaḥ
[paapeeyasee dheer dvija-deva-gobhyah]
adya — this day eva — on the very rājyam — kingdom balam ṛddha — strength and riches kośam — treasury prakopita — ignited by brahma-kula — by the brāhmaṇa community analaḥ — fire me dahatu — let it burn me abhadrasya — inauspiciousness punaḥ — again na — not me — unto me abhūt — may occur pāpīyasī — sinful dhīḥ — intelligence dvija — brāhmaṇas deva — the Supreme Lord gobhyaḥ — and the cows.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
adyaiva rājyaṁ balam ṛddha-kośaṁ
adya
this day
prakopita-brahma-kulānalo me
dahatv abhadrasya punar na me ’bhūt
pāpīyasī dhīr dvija-deva-gobhyaḥ
eva
on the very
rājyam
kingdom
balam ṛddha
strength and riches
kośam
treasury
prakopita
ignited by
brahma-kula
by the brāhmaṇa community
analaḥ
fire
me dahatu
let it burn me
abhadrasya
inauspiciousness
punaḥ
again
na
not
me
unto me
abhūt
may occur
pāpīyasī
sinful
dhīḥ
intelligence
dvija
brāhmaṇas
deva
the Supreme Lord
gobhyaḥ
and the cows.
I am uncivilized and sinful due to my neglect of brahminical culture, God consciousness and cow protection. Therefore I wish that my kingdom, strength and riches burn up immediately by the fire of the brāhmaṇa’s wrath so that in the future I may not be guided by such inauspicious attitudes.

Progressive human civilization is based on brahminical culture, God consciousness and protection of cows. All economic development of the state by trade, commerce, agriculture and industries must be fully utilized in relation to the above principles, otherwise all so-called economic development becomes a source of degradation. Cow protection means feeding the brahminical culture, which leads towards God consciousness, and thus perfection of human civilization is achieved. The Age of Kali aims at killing the higher principles of life, and although Mahārāja Parīkṣit strongly resisted the domination of the personality of Kali within the world, the influence of the Age of Kali came at an opportune moment, and even a strong king like Mahārāja Parīkṣit was induced to disregard the brahminical culture due to a slight provocation of hunger and thirst. Mahārāja Parīkṣit lamented the accidental incident, and he desired that all his kingdom, strength and accumulation of wealth would be burned up for not being engaged in brahminical culture, etc.

Where wealth and strength are not engaged in the advancement of brahminical culture, God consciousness and cow protection, the state and home are surely doomed by providence. If we want peace and prosperity in the world, we should take lessons from this verse; every state and every home must endeavor to advance the cause of brahminical culture for self-purification, God consciousness for self-realization, and cow protection for getting sufficient milk and the best food to continue a perfect civilization.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Let the fire of an angry brāhmaṇa family burn up my kingdom, strength, and wealth today, since I am so sinful! May I never again think sinfully of giving suffering to brāhmaṇas, devatās or cows!
Commentary

May my intelligence not cause suffering to the brāhmaṇas and devatās.

I am uncivilized and sinful from neglect of brahminical culture, God consciousness, and cow protection. Let my kingdom burn so I never sin again. Sometimes losing the stage prevents future scenes.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'kingdom' of mine, if relinquished, would prevent future wrongs?
  • Where could loss be the safeguard I need?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.4

↗
स चिन्तयन्नित्थमथाश‍ृणोद् यथा मुने: सुतोक्तो निऋर्तिस्तक्षकाख्य: । स साधु मेने न चिरेण तक्षका- नलं प्रसक्तस्य विरक्तिकारणम् ॥ ४ ॥
sa cintayann ittham athāśṛṇod yathā
[sa chintayann ittham athaashrinod yathaa]
muneḥ sutokto nirṛtis takṣakākhyaḥ
[muneh sutokto nirritis takshakaakhyah]
sa sādhu mene na cireṇa takṣakā-
[sa saadhu mene na chirena takshakaa-]
nalaṁ prasaktasya virakti-kāraṇam
[nalam prasaktasya virakti-kaaranam]
saḥ — he, the King cintayan — thinking ittham — like this atha — now aśṛṇot — heard yathā — as muneḥ — of the sage suta-uktaḥ — uttered by the son nirṛtiḥ — death takṣaka-ākhyaḥ — in relation with the snake-bird saḥ — he (the King) sādhu — well and good mene — accepted na — not cireṇa — very long time takṣaka — snake-bird analam — fire prasaktasya — for one who is too attached virakti — indifference kāraṇam — cause.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa cintayann ittham athāśṛṇod yathā
saḥ
he, the King
cintayan
thinking
ittham
like this
atha
now
aśṛṇot
heard
yathā
as
muneḥ sutokto nirṛtis takṣakākhyaḥ
muneḥ
of the sage
suta-uktaḥ
uttered by the son
nirṛtiḥ
death
takṣaka-ākhyaḥ
in relation with the snake-bird
sa sādhu mene na cireṇa takṣakā-
saḥ
he (the King)
sādhu
well and good
mene
accepted
na
not
cireṇa
very long time
takṣaka
snake-bird
nalaṁ prasaktasya virakti-kāraṇam
analam
fire
prasaktasya
for one who is too attached
virakti
indifference
kāraṇam
cause.
While the King was thus repenting, he received news of his imminent death, which would be due to the bite of a snake-bird, occasioned by the curse spoken by the sage’s son. The King accepted this as good news, for it would be the cause of his indifference toward worldly things.

Real happiness is achieved by spiritual existence or by cessation of the repetition of birth and death. One can stop the repetition of birth and death only by going back to Godhead. In the material world, even by attaining the topmost planet (Brahmaloka), one cannot get rid of the conditions of repeated birth and death, but still we do not accept the path of attaining perfection. The path of perfection frees one from all material attachments, and thus one becomes fit to enter into the spiritual kingdom. Therefore, those who are materially poverty-stricken are better candidates than those who are materially prosperous. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a great devotee of the Lord and a bona fide candidate for entering into the kingdom of God, but even though he was so, his material assets as the Emperor of the world were setbacks to perfect attainment of his rightful status as one of the associates of the Lord in the spiritual sky. As a devotee of the Lord, he could understand that the cursing of the brāhmaṇa boy, although unwise, was a blessing upon him, being the cause of detachment from worldly affairs, both political and social. Śamīka Muni also, after regretting the incident, conveyed the news to the King as a matter of duty so that the King would be able to prepare himself to go back to Godhead. Śamīka Muni sent news to the King that foolish Śṛṅgi, his son, although a powerful brāhmaṇa boy, unfortunately had misused his spiritual power by cursing the King unwarrantedly. The incident of the King’s garlanding the muni was not sufficient cause for being cursed to death, but since there was no way to retract the curse, the King was informed to prepare for death within a week. Both Śamīka Muni and the King were self-realized souls. Śamīka Muni was a mystic, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a devotee. Therefore there was no difference between them in self-realization. Neither of them was afraid of meeting death. Mahārāja Parīkṣit could have gone to the muni to beg his pardon, but the news of imminent death was conveyed to the King with so much regret by the muni that the King did not want to shame the muni further by his presence there. He decided to prepare himself for his imminent death and find out the way to go back to Godhead.

The life of a human being is a chance to prepare oneself to go back to Godhead, or to get rid of the material existence, the repetition of birth and death. Thus in the system of varṇāśrama-dharma every man and woman is trained for this purpose. In other words, the system of varṇāśrama-dharma is known also as sanātana-dharma, or the eternal occupation. The system of varṇāśrama-dharma prepares a man for going back to Godhead, and thus a householder is ordered to go to the forest as a vānaprastha to acquire complete knowledge and then to take sannyāsa prior to his inevitable death. Parīkṣit Mahārāja was fortunate to get a seven-day notice to meet his inevitable death. But for the common man there is no definite notice, although death is inevitable for all. Foolish men forget this sure fact of death and neglect the duty of preparing themselves for going back to Godhead. They spoil their lives in animal propensities to eat, drink, be merry and enjoy. Such an irresponsible life is adopted by the people in the Age of Kali because of a sinful desire to condemn brahminical culture, God consciousness and cow protection, for which the state is responsible. The state must employ revenue to advance these three items and thus educate the populace to prepare for death. The state which does so is the real welfare state. The state of India should better follow the examples of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the ideal executive head, than to imitate other materialistic states which have no idea of the kingdom of Godhead, the ultimate goal of human life. Deterioration of the ideals of Indian civilization has brought about the deterioration of civic life, not only in India but also abroad.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As he was thus thinking, he heard about how he would die from the bite of Takṣaka because of the curse issued by the sage’s son. He considered it beneficial that soon the fire of Takṣaka would be the cause of detachment from material life.
Commentary

He heard how he would die from Takṣaka in seven days as pronounced by the son of the sage, from a student called Gauramukha sent by Śamīka. “O King! Hearing about the curse made by his ignorant son, regretting it repeatedly, our guru scolded his son and not seeing any remedy, fell into grief. Full of suffering he sent me to you with a message. Understanding this, the King should make preparations for departing.” When the messenger had departed, the King wanted to go there to beg forgiveness for his offense, but considering that the sage would be embarrassed, and also because he did not desire negation of the curse, he did not go. He considered the fiery poison of Takṣaka beneficial because it would produce detachment from all his attachments.

While repenting, he received news of his imminent death by snake-bird. He accepted this as good news — it would cause his indifference toward worldly things. The right news, properly received, is liberation.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'bad news' could I receive as good if I held it differently?
  • Where am I letting bad news bind me instead of free me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.5

↗
अथो विहायेमममुं च लोकं विमर्शितौ हेयतया पुरस्तात् । कृष्णाङ्‌घ्रिसेवामधिमन्यमान उपाविशत् प्रायममर्त्यनद्याम् ॥ ५ ॥
atho vihāyemam amuṁ ca lokaṁ
[atho vihaayemam amum cha lokam]
vimarśitau heyatayā purastāt
[vimarshitau heyatayaa purastaat]
kṛṣṇāṅghri-sevām adhimanyamāna
[krishnaanghri-sevaam adhimanyamaana]
upāviśat prāyam amartya-nadyām
[upaavishat praayam amartya-nadyaam]
atho — thus vihāya — giving up imam — this amum — and the next ca — also lokam — planets vimarśitau — all of them being judged heyatayā — because of inferiority purastāt — hereinbefore kṛṣṇa-aṅghri — the lotus feet of the Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa sevām — transcendental loving service adhimanyamānaḥ — one who thinks of the greatest of all achievements upāviśat — sat down firmly prāyam — for fasting amartya-nadyām — on the bank of the transcendental river (the Ganges or the Yamunā).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atho vihāyemam amuṁ ca lokaṁ
atho
thus
vihāya
giving up
vimarśitau heyatayā purastāt
imam
this
kṛṣṇāṅghri-sevām adhimanyamāna
amum
and the next
ca
also
lokam
planets
upāviśat prāyam amartya-nadyām
vimarśitau
all of them being judged
heyatayā
because of inferiority
purastāt
hereinbefore
kṛṣṇa-aṅghri
the lotus feet of the Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
sevām
transcendental loving service
adhimanyamānaḥ
one who thinks of the greatest of all achievements
upāviśat
sat down firmly
prāyam
for fasting
amartya-nadyām
on the bank of the transcendental river (the Ganges or the Yamunā).
Mahārāja Parīkṣit sat down firmly on the banks of the Ganges to concentrate his mind in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, rejecting all other practices of self-realization, because transcendental loving service to Kṛṣṇa is the greatest achievement, superseding all other methods.

For a devotee like Mahārāja Parīkṣit, none of the material planets, even the topmost Brahmaloka, is as desirable as Goloka Vṛndāvana, the abode of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the primeval Lord and original Personality of Godhead. This earth is one of the innumerable material planets within the universe, and there are innumerable universes also within the compass of the mahat-tattva. The devotees are told by the Lord and His representatives, the spiritual masters or ācāryas, that not one of the planets within all the innumerable universes is suitable for the residential purposes of a devotee. The devotee always desires to go back home, back to Godhead, just to become one of the associates of the Lord in the capacity of servitor, friend, parent or conjugal lover of the Lord, either in one of the innumerable Vaikuṇṭha planets or in Goloka Vṛndāvana, the planet of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. All these planets are eternally situated in the spiritual sky, the paravyoma, which is on the other side of the Causal Ocean within the mahat-tattva. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was already aware of all this information due to his accumulated piety and birth in a high family of devotees, Vaiṣṇavas, and thus he was not at all interested in the material planets. Modern scientists are very eager to reach the moon by material arrangements, but they cannot conceive of the highest planet of this universe. But a devotee like Mahārāja Parīkṣit does not care a fig for the moon or, for that matter, any of the material planets. So when he was assured of his death on a fixed date, he became more determined in the transcendental loving service of Lord Kṛṣṇa by complete fasting on the bank of the transcendental river Yamunā, which flows down by the capital of Hastināpura (in the Delhi state). Both the Ganges and the Yamunā are amartyā (transcendental) rivers, and the Yamunā is still more sanctified for the following reasons.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having previously concluded that both were to be rejected — giving up this world and Svarga — and thinking that service to Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet was the highest goal, he sat down with a vow of not eating on the bank of the Gaṅgā.
Commentary

How did he give up the goals of this world and the next? Previously before the curse, he had already concluded that both should be rejected. Then, thinking that service to the Lord’s feet was supreme among all goals (adhi), he sat down with the vow of not eating (prāyam).

He sat firmly on the Ganges' banks to concentrate his mind in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, rejecting all other practices, because loving service to Kṛṣṇa is the greatest achievement. Choose the highest method when time is short.
Reflection Questions
  • When time is short, what becomes my one chosen practice?
  • Where am I diversifying when concentration is needed?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.6

↗
या वै लसच्छ्रीतुलसीविमिश्र- कृष्णाङ्‌घ्रिरेण्वभ्यधिकाम्बुनेत्री । पुनाति लोकानुभयत्र सेशान् कस्तां न सेवेत मरिष्यमाण: ॥ ६ ॥
yā vai lasac-chrī-tulasī-vimiśra-
[yaa vai lasach-chree-tulasee-vimishra-]
kṛṣṇāṅghri-reṇv-abhyadhikāmbu-netrī
[krishnaanghri-renv-abhyadhikaambu-netree]
punāti lokān ubhayatra seśān
[punaati lokaan ubhayatra seshaan]
kas tāṁ na seveta mariṣyamāṇaḥ
[kas taam na seveta marishyamaanah]
yā — the river which vai — always lasat — floating with śrī-tulasī — tulasī leaves vimiśra — mixed kṛṣṇa-aṅghri — the lotus feet of the Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa reṇu — dust abhyadhika — auspicious ambu — water netrī — that which is carrying punāti — sanctifies lokān — planets ubhayatra — both the upper and lower or inside and outside sa-īśān — along with Lord Śiva kaḥ — who else tām — that river na — does not seveta — worship mariṣyamāṇaḥ — one who is to die at any moment.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yā vai lasac-chrī-tulasī-vimiśra-
yā
the river which
vai
always
lasat
floating with
śrī-tulasī
tulasī leaves
vimiśra
mixed
kṛṣṇāṅghri-reṇv-abhyadhikāmbu-netrī
kṛṣṇa-aṅghri
the lotus feet of the Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
reṇu
dust
abhyadhika
auspicious
ambu
water
netrī
that which is carrying
punāti lokān ubhayatra seśān
punāti
sanctifies
lokān
planets
ubhayatra
both the upper and lower or inside and outside
sa-īśān
along with Lord Śiva
kas tāṁ na seveta mariṣyamāṇaḥ
kaḥ
who else
tām
that river
na
does not
seveta
worship
mariṣyamāṇaḥ
one who is to die at any moment.
The river [by which the King sat to fast] carries the most auspicious water, which is mixed with the dust of the lotus feet of the Lord and tulasī leaves. Therefore that water sanctifies the three worlds inside and outside and even sanctifies Lord Śiva and other demigods. Consequently everyone who is destined to die must take shelter of this river.

Mahārāja Parīkṣit, just after receiving the news of his death within seven days, at once retired from family life and shifted himself to the sacred bank of the Yamunā River. Generally it is said that the King took shelter on the bank of the Ganges, but according to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, the King took shelter on the bank of the Yamunā. Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī’s statement appears to be more accurate because of the geographical situation. Mahārāja Parīkṣit resided in his capital Hastināpura, situated near present Delhi, and the river Yamunā flows down past the city. Naturally the King would take shelter of the river Yamunā because she was flowing past his palace door. And as far as sanctity is concerned, the river Yamunā is more directly connected with Lord Kṛṣṇa than the Ganges. The Lord sanctified the river Yamunā from the beginning of His transcendental pastimes in the world. While His father Vasudeva was crossing the Yamunā with the baby Lord Kṛṣṇa for a safe place at Gokula on the other bank of the river from Mathurā, the Lord fell down in the river, and by the dust of His lotus feet the river at once became sanctified. It is especially mentioned herein that Mahārāja Parīkṣit took shelter of that particular river which is beautifully flowing, carrying the dust of the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa, mixed with tulasī leaves. Lord Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet are always besmeared with the tulasī leaves, and thus as soon as His lotus feet contact the water of the Ganges and the Yamunā, the rivers become at once sanctified. The Lord, however, contacted the river Yamunā more than the Ganges. According to the Varāha Purāṇa, as quoted by Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, there is no difference between the water of the Ganges and the Yamunā, but when the water of the Ganges is sanctified one hundred times, it is called the Yamunā. Similarly, it is said in the scriptures that one thousand names of Viṣṇu are equal to one name of Rāma, and three names of Lord Rāma are equal to one name of Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Who at the point of death would not serve the Gaṅgā who, carrying water made excellent by the dust of Kṛṣṇa’s feet mixed with beautiful tulasī, purifies the worlds along with their leaders inside and outside, above and below?
Commentary

The Gaṅgā is described. She carries (netrī) most excellent (abhyadhika) water. The water purifies internally and externally, above and below.

The river carries auspicious water mixed with dust of the Lord's feet and tulasī leaves. It sanctifies the three worlds inside and outside. Sacred water carries memory of presence.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'sacred water' in my life still carries memory of presence?
  • Where could I more deliberately seek and use such waters?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.7

↗
इति व्यवच्छिद्य स पाण्डवेय: प्रायोपवेशं प्रति विष्णुपद्याम् । दधौ मुकुन्दाङ्‌घ्रिमनन्यभावो मुनिव्रतो मुक्तसमस्तसङ्ग: ॥ ७ ॥
iti vyavacchidya sa pāṇḍaveyaḥ
[iti vyavachchidya sa paandaveyah]
prāyopaveśaṁ prati viṣṇu-padyām
[praayopavesham prati vishnu-padyaam]
dadhau mukundāṅghrim ananya-bhāvo
[dadhau mukundaanghrim ananya-bhaavo]
muni-vrato mukta-samasta-saṅgaḥ
[muni-vrato mukta-samasta-sangah]
iti — thus vyavacchidya — having decided saḥ — the King pāṇḍaveyaḥ — worthy descendant of the Pāṇḍavas prāya-upaveśam — for fasting until death prati — toward viṣṇu-padyām — on the bank of the Ganges (emanating from the lotus feet of Lord Viṣṇu) dadhau — gave himself up mukunda-aṅghrim — unto the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa ananya — without deviation bhāvaḥ — spirit muni-vrataḥ — with the vows of a sage mukta — liberated from samasta — all kinds of saṅgaḥ — association.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti vyavacchidya sa pāṇḍaveyaḥ
iti
thus
vyavacchidya
having decided
saḥ
the King
pāṇḍaveyaḥ
worthy descendant of the Pāṇḍavas
prāyopaveśaṁ prati viṣṇu-padyām
prāya-upaveśam
for fasting until death
prati
toward
viṣṇu-padyām
on the bank of the Ganges (emanating from the lotus feet of Lord Viṣṇu)
dadhau mukundāṅghrim ananya-bhāvo
dadhau
gave himself up
mukunda-aṅghrim
unto the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa
ananya
without deviation
bhāvaḥ
spirit
muni-vrato mukta-samasta-saṅgaḥ
muni-vrataḥ
with the vows of a sage
mukta
liberated from
samasta
all kinds of
saṅgaḥ
association.
Thus the King, the worthy descendant of the Pāṇḍavas, decided once and for all and sat on the Ganges’ bank to fast until death and give himself up to the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who alone is able to award liberation. So, freeing himself from all kinds of associations and attachments, he accepted the vows of a sage.

The water of the Ganges sanctifies all the three worlds, including the gods and the demigods, because it emanates from the lotus feet of the Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. Lord Kṛṣṇa is the fountainhead of the principle of viṣṇu-tattva, and therefore shelter of His lotus feet can deliver one from all sins, including an offense committed by a king unto a brāhmaṇa. Mahārāja Parīkṣit, therefore, decided to meditate upon the lotus feet of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is Mukunda, or the giver of liberations of all description. The banks of the Ganges or the Yamunā give one a chance to remember the Lord continuously. Mahārāja Parīkṣit freed himself from all sorts of material association and meditated upon the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and that is the way of liberation. To be free from all material association means to cease completely from committing any further sins. To meditate upon the lotus feet of the Lord means to become free from the effects of all previous sins. The conditions of the material world are so made that one has to commit sins willingly or unwillingly, and the best example is Mahārāja Parīkṣit himself, who was a recognized sinless, pious king. But he also became a victim of an offense, even though he was ever unwilling to commit such a mistake. He was cursed also, but because he was a great devotee of the Lord, even such reverses of life became favorable. The principle is that one should not willingly commit any sin in his life and should constantly remember the lotus feet of the Lord without deviation. Only in such a mood will the Lord help the devotee make regular progress toward the path of liberation and thus attain the lotus feet of the Lord. Even if there are accidental sins committed by the devotee, the Lord saves the surrendered soul from all sins, as confirmed in all scriptures.

sva-pāda-mūlaṁ bhajataḥ priyasya tyaktāny abhāvasya hariḥ pareśaḥ vikarma yac cotpatitaṁ kathañcid dhunoti sarvaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭaḥ

( Bhāg. 11.5.42 )

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Making this decision to sit without eating on the bank of the Gaṅgā, Parīkṣit, without thoughts of other processes or deities, peaceful, and free of all material attachments, concentrated on the feet of Mukunda.
Commentary

Deciding (vyavacchidya) to sit and fast, he did not think of karma, jñāna or other deities (ananya-bhāvaḥ).

Related verses
The worthy descendant of Pāṇḍu sat to fast until death and gave himself to Kṛṣṇa's lotus feet — freeing himself from all relationships. Final fasting is total handover. The end is not partial.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'partial handover' am I doing where total is being called for?
  • Where could the end of one season be a more complete release?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.8

↗
तत्रोपजग्मुर्भुवनं पुनाना महानुभावा मुनय: सशिष्या: । प्रायेण तीर्थाभिगमापदेशै: स्वयं हि तीर्थानि पुनन्ति सन्त: ॥ ८ ॥
tatropajagmur bhuvanaṁ punānā
[tatropajagmur bhuvanam punaanaa]
mahānubhāvā munayaḥ sa-śiṣyāḥ
[mahaanubhaavaa munayah sa-shishyaah]
prāyeṇa tīrthābhigamāpadeśaiḥ
[praayena teerthaabhigamaapadeshaih]
svayaṁ hi tīrthāni punanti santaḥ
[svayam hi teerthaani punanti santah]
tatra — there upajagmuḥ — arrived bhuvanam — the universe punānāḥ — those who can sanctify mahā-anubhāvāḥ — great minds munayaḥ — thinkers sa-śiṣyāḥ — along with their disciples prāyeṇa — almost tīrtha — place of pilgrimage abhigama — journey apadeśaiḥ — on the plea of svayam — personally hi — certainly tīrthāni — all the places of pilgrimage punanti — sanctify santaḥ — sages.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatropajagmur bhuvanaṁ punānā
tatra
there
upajagmuḥ
arrived
bhuvanam
the universe
punānāḥ
those who can sanctify
mahānubhāvā munayaḥ sa-śiṣyāḥ
mahā-anubhāvāḥ
great minds
munayaḥ
thinkers
sa-śiṣyāḥ
along with their disciples
prāyeṇa tīrthābhigamāpadeśaiḥ
prāyeṇa
almost
tīrtha
place of pilgrimage
abhigama
journey
apadeśaiḥ
on the plea of
svayaṁ hi tīrthāni punanti santaḥ
svayam
personally
hi
certainly
tīrthāni
all the places of pilgrimage
punanti
sanctify
santaḥ
sages.
At that time all the great minds and thinkers, accompanied by their disciples, and sages who could verily sanctify a place of pilgrimage just by their presence, arrived there on the plea of making a pilgrim’s journey.

When Mahārāja Parīkṣit sat down on the bank of the Ganges, the news spread in all directions of the universe, and the great-minded sages, who could follow the importance of the occasion, all arrived there on the plea of pilgrimage. Actually they came to meet Mahārāja Parīkṣit and not to take a bath of pilgrimage because all of them were competent enough to sanctify the places of pilgrimage. Common men go to pilgrimage sites to get themselves purified of all sins. Thus the places of pilgrimage become overburdened with the sins of others. But when such sages visit overburdened places of pilgrimage, they sanctify the places by their presence. Therefore the sages who came to meet Mahārāja Parīkṣit were not very much interested in getting themselves purified like common men, but on the plea of taking a bath in that place they came to meet Mahārāja Parīkṣit because they could foresee that Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam would be spoken by Śukadeva Gosvāmī. All of them wanted to take advantage of the great occasion.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Noble-minded sages who purify the world came along with their disciples to see Parīkṣit there on the pretext of visiting a holy place. The devotees, being holy places personified, actually purify the holy places.
Commentary

The sages came to see Parīkṣit, not to bathe, since they were already pure. “But they are seen to visit holy places.” This is only a pretext (prāyena). They had understood that seeing Parīkṣit was superior to seeing the holy places. Understanding suddenly by their omniscience that they could not taste astonishing bliss in any other way, they came to drink the sweetness of the Bhāgavatam.

At that time all the great minds and thinkers, with disciples and sages who can sanctify any pilgrimage just by their presence, arrived on the plea of making a pilgrim's journey. Great souls show up when great souls are leaving.
Reflection Questions
  • When have I sensed the right people gathering at a meaningful moment?
  • Where could I be among those who show up?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.9-10

↗
अत्रिर्वसिष्ठश्‍च्यवन: शरद्वा- नरिष्टनेमिर्भृगुरङ्गिराश्च । पराशरो गाधिसुतोऽथ राम उतथ्य इन्द्रप्रमदेध्मवाहौ ॥ ९ ॥ मेधातिथिर्देवल आर्ष्टिषेणो भारद्वाजो गौतम: पिप्पलाद: । मैत्रेय और्व: कवष: कुम्भयोनि- र्द्वैपायनो भगवान्नारदश्च ॥ १० ॥
atrir vasiṣṭhaś cyavanaḥ śaradvān
[atrir vasishthash chyavanah sharadvaan]
ariṣṭanemir bhṛgur aṅgirāś ca
[arishtanemir bhrigur angiraash cha]
parāśaro gādhi-suto ’tha rāma
[paraasharo gaadhi-suto ’tha raama]
utathya indrapramadedhmavāhau
[utathya indrapramadedhmavaahau]
medhātithir devala ārṣṭiṣeṇo
[medhaatithir devala aarshtisheno]
bhāradvājo gautamaḥ pippalādaḥ
[bhaaradvaajo gautamah pippalaadah]
maitreya aurvaḥ kavaṣaḥ kumbhayonir
[maitreya aurvah kavashah kumbhayonir]
dvaipāyano bhagavān nāradaś ca
[dvaipaayano bhagavaan naaradash cha]
atriḥ to nāradaḥ — all names of the different saintly personalities who arrived there from different parts of the universe.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atrir vasiṣṭhaś cyavanaḥ śaradvān
atriḥ to nāradaḥ
all names of the different saintly personalities who arrived there from different parts of the universe.
ariṣṭanemir bhṛgur aṅgirāś ca
parāśaro gādhi-suto ’tha rāma
utathya indrapramadedhmavāhau
medhātithir devala ārṣṭiṣeṇo
bhāradvājo gautamaḥ pippalādaḥ
maitreya aurvaḥ kavaṣaḥ kumbhayonir
dvaipāyano bhagavān nāradaś ca
From different parts of the universe there arrived great sages like Atri, Cyavana, Śaradvān, Ariṣṭanemi, Bhṛgu, Vasiṣṭha, Parāśara, Viśvāmitra, Aṅgirā, Paraśurāma, Utathya, Indrapramada, Idhmavāhu, Medhātithi, Devala, Ārṣṭiṣeṇa, Bhāradvāja, Gautama, Pippalāda, Maitreya, Aurva, Kavaṣa, Kumbhayoni, Dvaipāyana and the great personality Nārada.

Cyavana: A great sage and one of the sons of Bhṛgu Muni. He was born prematurely when his pregnant mother was kidnapped. Cyavana is one of the six sons of his father.

Bhṛgu: When Brahmājī was performing a great sacrifice on behalf of Varuṇa, Maharṣi Bhṛgu was born from the sacrificial fire. He was a great sage, and his very dear wife was Pulomā. He could travel in space like Durvāsā, Nārada and others, and he used to visit all the planets of the universe. Before the Battle of Kurukṣetra, he tried to stop the battle. Sometimes he instructed Bhāradvāja Muni about astronomical evolution, and he is the author of the great Bhṛgu-saṁhitā, the great astrological calculation. He explained how air, fire, water and earth are generated from ether. He explained how the air in the stomach works and regulates the intestines. As a great philosopher, he logically established the eternity of the living entity ( Mahābhārata ). He was also a great anthropologist, and the theory of evolution was long ago explained by him. He was a scientific propounder of the four divisions and orders of human society known as the varṇāśrama institution. He converted the kṣatriya king Vītahavya into a brāhmaṇa.

Vasiṣṭha: See Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.6.

Parāśara: He is the grandson of Vasiṣṭha Muni and father of Vyāsadeva. He is the son of Maharṣi Śakti, and his mother’s name was Adṛśyatī. He was in the womb of his mother when she was only twelve years old. And from within the womb of his mother he learned the Vedas. His father was killed by a demon, Kalmāṣapāda, and to avenge this he wanted to annihilate the whole world. He was restrained, however, by his grandfather Vasiṣṭha. He then performed a Rākṣasa-killing yajña, but Maharṣi Pulastya restrained him. He begot Vyāsadeva, being attracted by Satyavatī, who was to become the wife of Mahārāja Śāntanu. By the blessings of Parāśara, Satyavatī became fragrant for miles. He was present also during the time of Bhīṣma’s death. He was the spiritual master of Mahārāja Janaka and a great devotee of Lord Śiva. He is the author of many Vedic scriptures and sociological directions.

Gādhi-suta, or Viśvāmitra: A great sage of austerity and mystic power. He is famous as Gādhi-suta because his father was Gādhi, a powerful king of the province of Kanyākubja (part of Uttara Pradesh). Although he was a kṣatriya by birth, he became a brāhmaṇa in the very same body by the power of his spiritual achievements. He picked a quarrel with Vasiṣṭha Muni when he was a kṣatriya king and performed a great sacrifice in cooperation with Maṭaṅga Muni and thus was able to vanquish the sons of Vasiṣṭha. He became a great yogī, and yet he failed to check his senses and thus was obliged to become the father of Śakuntalā, the beauty queen of world history. Once, when he was a kṣatriya king, he visited the hermitage of Vasiṣṭha Muni, and he was given a royal reception. Viśvāmitra wanted from Vasiṣṭha a cow named Nandinī, and the Muni refused to deliver it. Viśvāmitra stole the cow, and thus there was a quarrel between the sage and the King. Viśvāmitra was defeated by the spiritual strength of Vasiṣṭha, and thus the King decided to become a brāhmaṇa. Before becoming a brāhmaṇa he underwent severe austerity on the bank of the Kauśika. He was also one who tried to stop the Kurukṣetra war.

Aṅgirā: He is one of the six mental sons of Brahmā and the father of Bṛhaspati, the great learned priest of the demigods in the heavenly planets. He was born of the semen of Brahmājī given to a cinder of fire. Utathya and Saṁvarta are his sons. It is said that he is still performing austerity and chanting the holy name of the Lord at a place known as Alokānanda on the banks of the Ganges.

Paraśurāma: See Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.6.

Utathya: One of the three sons of Maharṣi Aṅgirā. He was the spiritual master of Mahārāja Mandhātā. He married Bhadrā, the daughter of Soma (moon). Varuṇa kidnapped his wife Bhadrā, and to retaliate the offense of the god of water, he drank all the water of the world.

Medhātithi: An old sage of yore. An assembly member of the heavenly King Indradeva. His son was Kaṇva Muni, who brought up Śakuntalā in the forest. He was promoted to the heavenly planet by strictly following the principles of retired life ( vānaprastha ).

Devala: A great authority like Nārada Muni and Vyāsadeva. His good name is on the list of authorities mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā when Arjuna acknowledged Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He met Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira after the Battle of Kurukṣetra, and he was the elder brother of Dhaumya, the priest of the Pāṇḍava family. Like the kṣatriyas, he also allowed his daughter to select her own husband in a svayaṁvara meeting, and at that ceremony all the bachelor sons of the ṛṣis were invited. According to some, he is not Asita Devala.

Bhāradvāja: See Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.9.6.

Gautama: One of the seven great sages of the universe. Śaradvān Gautama was one of his sons. Persons in the Gautama-gotra (dynasty) today are either his family descendants or in his disciplic succession. The brāhmaṇas who profess Gautama-gotra are generally family descendants, and the kṣatriyas and vaiśyas who profess Gautama-gotra are all in the line of his disciplic succession. He was the husband of the famous Ahalyā who turned into stone when Indradeva, the King of the heaven, molested her. Ahalyā was delivered by Lord Rāmacandra. Gautama was the grandfather of Kṛpācārya, one of the heroes of the Battle of Kurukṣetra.

Maitreya: A great ṛṣi of yore. He was the spiritual master of Vidura and a great religious authority. He advised Dhṛtarāṣṭra to keep good relations with the Pāṇḍavas. Duryodhana disagreed and thus was cursed by him. He met Vyāsadeva and had religious discourses with him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Atri, Vasiṣṭha, Cyavana, Śaradvān, Ariṣṭameni, Bhṛgu, Aṅgirās, Parāśara, Viśvamitra, Paraśurāma, Utathya, Indrapramada, Subāhu, Medhātithi, Devala, Ārṣṭiṣeṇa, Bhāradvāja, Gautama, Pippalāda, Maitreya, Aurava, Kavaṣa, Agastya, Vyāsa and Nārada came there.
Related verses
From different parts of the universe arrived Atri, Cyavana, Śaradvān, Ariṣṭanemi, Bhṛgu, Vasiṣṭha, Parāśara, Viśvāmitra, Aṅgirā, Paraśurāma, Utathya, Indrapramada, and others. The roll of sages is itself a benediction.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'roll call' would be a benediction at my own threshold?
  • Where could I be more deliberate about cultivating such relationships?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.11

↗
अन्ये च देवर्षिब्रह्मर्षिवर्या राजर्षिवर्या अरुणादयश्च । नानार्षेयप्रवरान् समेता- नभ्यर्च्य राजा शिरसा ववन्दे ॥ ११ ॥
anye ca devarṣi-brahmarṣi-varyā
[anye cha devarshi-brahmarshi-varyaa]
rājarṣi-varyā aruṇādayaś ca
[raajarshi-varyaa arunaadayash cha]
nānārṣeya-pravarān sametān
[naanaarsheya-pravaraan sametaan]
abhyarcya rājā śirasā vavande
[abhyarchya raajaa shirasaa vavande]
anye — many others ca — also devarṣi — saintly demigods brahmarṣi — saintly brāhmaṇas varyāḥ — topmost rājarṣi-varyāḥ — topmost saintly kings aruṇa-ādayaḥ — a special rank of rājarṣis ca — and nānā — many others ārṣeya-pravarān — chief amongst the dynasties of the sages sametān — assembled together abhyarcya — by worshiping rājā — the Emperor śirasā — bowed his head to the ground vavande — welcomed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anye ca devarṣi-brahmarṣi-varyā
anye
many others
ca
also
devarṣi
saintly demigods
brahmarṣi
saintly brāhmaṇas
varyāḥ
topmost
rājarṣi-varyā aruṇādayaś ca
rājarṣi-varyāḥ
topmost saintly kings
aruṇa-ādayaḥ
a special rank of rājarṣis
ca
and
nānārṣeya-pravarān sametān
nānā
many others
ārṣeya-pravarān
chief amongst the dynasties of the sages
sametān
assembled together
abhyarcya rājā śirasā vavande
abhyarcya
by worshiping
rājā
the Emperor
śirasā
bowed his head to the ground
vavande
welcomed.
There were also many other saintly demigods, kings and special royal orders called aruṇādayas [a special rank of rājarṣis] from different dynasties of sages. When they all assembled together to meet the Emperor [Parīkṣit], he received them properly and bowed his head to the ground.

The system of bowing the head to the ground to show respect to superiors is an excellent etiquette which obliges the honored guest deep into the heart. Even the first-grade offender is excused simply by this process, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit, although honored by all the ṛṣis and kings, welcomed all the big men in that humble etiquette in order to be excused from any offenses. Generally at the last stage of one’s life this humble method is adopted by every sensible man in order to be excused before departure. In this way Mahārāja Parīkṣit implored everyone’s good will for going back home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Other exalted sages among the devatās, sages of great penance, sages among kings and Aruṇas also came. Welcoming the best of sages, the king bowed his head.
Commentary

Aruṇas are certain sages who are expert in certain parts of the Vedas.

Many other saintly demigods, kings, and special royal orders called aruṇādayas from different dynasties of sages also came. The good cluster naturally. Holy gravitational pull is real.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'gravitational pull' do I have around the right people — or am I missing it?
  • Where could one act draw a cluster?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.12

↗
सुखोपविष्टेष्वथ तेषु भूय: कृतप्रणाम: स्वचिकीर्षितं यत् । विज्ञापयामास विविक्तचेता उपस्थितोऽग्रेऽभिगृहीतपाणि: ॥ १२ ॥
sukhopaviṣṭeṣv atha teṣu bhūyaḥ
[sukhopavishteshv atha teshu bhooyah]
kṛta-praṇāmaḥ sva-cikīrṣitaṁ yat
[krita-pranaamah sva-chikeershitam yat]
vijñāpayām āsa vivikta-cetā
[vijnaapayaam aasa vivikta-chetaa]
upasthito ’gre ’bhigṛhīta-pāṇiḥ
[upasthito ’gre ’bhigriheeta-paanih]
sukha — happily upaviṣṭeṣu — all sitting down atha — thereupon teṣu — unto them (the visitors) bhūyaḥ — again kṛta-praṇāmaḥ — having offered obeisances sva — his own cikīrṣitam — decision of fasting yat — who vijñāpayām āsa — submitted vivikta-cetāḥ — one whose mind is detached from worldly affairs upasthitaḥ — being present agre — before them abhigṛhīta-pāṇiḥ — humbly with folded hands.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sukhopaviṣṭeṣv atha teṣu bhūyaḥ
sukha
happily
kṛta-praṇāmaḥ sva-cikīrṣitaṁ yat
vijñāpayām āsa vivikta-cetā
upasthito ’gre ’bhigṛhīta-pāṇiḥ
upaviṣṭeṣu
all sitting down
atha
thereupon
teṣu
unto them (the visitors)
bhūyaḥ
again
kṛta-praṇāmaḥ
having offered obeisances
sva
his own
cikīrṣitam
decision of fasting
yat
who
vijñāpayām āsa
submitted
vivikta-cetāḥ
one whose mind is detached from worldly affairs
upasthitaḥ
being present
agre
before them
abhigṛhīta-pāṇiḥ
humbly with folded hands.
After all the ṛṣis and others had seated themselves comfortably, the King, humbly standing before them with folded hands, told them of his decision to fast until death.

Although the King had already decided to fast until death on the bank of the Ganges, he humbly expressed his decision to elicit the opinions of the great authorities present there. Any important decision, however firmly fixed, should be confirmed by some authority. That makes the matter perfect. This means that the monarchs who ruled the earth in those days were not irresponsible dictators. They scrupulously followed the authoritative decisions of the saints and sages in terms of Vedic injunction. Mahārāja Parīkṣit, as a perfect king, followed the principles by consulting the authorities, even up to the last days of his life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When they were all comfortably seated, standing in front of them, with pure heart and folded hands, he again offered respects and inquired from them concerning what he wanted to do.
Commentary

Abhigṛhīta-pāṇiḥ means “with folded hands.”

After all the ṛṣis were comfortably seated, the King humbly stood before them with folded hands and told them of his decision to fast until death. The leader stands while the wise sit. Posture says everything.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could I stand while others sit, in a posture of humble request?
  • What decision is mine to publicly declare to the wise?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.13

↗
राजोवाच
rājovāca
[raajovaacha]
aho vayaṁ dhanyatamā nṛpāṇāṁ
[aho vayam dhanyatamaa nripaanaam]
mahattamānugrahaṇīya-śīlāḥ
[mahattamaanugrahaneeya-sheelaah]
rājñāṁ kulaṁ brāhmaṇa-pāda-śaucād
[raajnaam kulam braahmana-paada-shauchaad]
dūrād visṛṣṭaṁ bata garhya-karma
[dooraad visrishtam bata garhya-karma]
rājā uvāca — the fortunate King said aho — ah vayam — we dhanya-tamāḥ — most thankful nṛpāṇām — of all the kings mahat-tama — of the great souls anugrahaṇīya-śīlāḥ — trained to get favors rājñām — of the royal kulam — orders brāhmaṇa-pāda — feet of the brāhmaṇas śaucāt — refuse after cleaning dūrāt — at a distance visṛṣṭam — always left out bata — on account of garhya — condemnable karma — activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājovāca
rājā uvāca
the fortunate King said
aho vayaṁ dhanyatamā nṛpāṇāṁ
aho
ah
vayam
we
dhanya-tamāḥ
most thankful
nṛpāṇām
of all the kings
mahattamānugrahaṇīya-śīlāḥ
mahat-tama
of the great souls
anugrahaṇīya-śīlāḥ
trained to get favors
rājñāṁ kulaṁ brāhmaṇa-pāda-śaucād
rājñām
of the royal
kulam
orders
brāhmaṇa-pāda
feet of the brāhmaṇas
śaucāt
refuse after cleaning
dūrād visṛṣṭaṁ bata garhya-karma
dūrāt
at a distance
visṛṣṭam
always left out
bata
on account of
garhya
condemnable
karma
activities.
The fortunate King said: Indeed, we are the most grateful of all the kings who are trained to get favors from the great souls. Generally you [sages] consider royalty as refuse to be rejected and left in a distant place.

According to religious principles, stool, urine, wash water, etc., must be left at a long distance. Attached bathrooms, urinals, etc., may be very convenient amenities of modern civilization, but they are ordered to be situated at a distance from residential quarters. That very example is cited herein in relation to the kingly order for those who are progressively marching back to Godhead. Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu said that to be in intimate touch with dollars-and-cents men, or the kingly order, is worse than suicide for one who desires to go back to Godhead. In other words, the transcendentalists do not generally associate with men who are too enamored by the external beauty of God’s creation. By advanced knowledge in spiritual realization, the transcendentalist knows that this beautiful material world is nothing but a shadowy reflection of the reality, the kingdom of God. They are not, therefore, very much captivated by royal opulence or anything like that. But in the case of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the situation was different. Apparently the King was condemned to death by an inexperienced brāhmaṇa boy, but factually he was called by the Lord to return to Him. Other transcendentalists, the great sages and mystics who assembled together because of Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s fasting unto death, were quite anxious to see him, for he was going back to Godhead. Mahārāja Parīkṣit also could understand that the great sages who assembled there were all kind to his forefathers, the Pāṇḍavas, because of their devotional service to the Lord. He therefore felt grateful to the sages for being present there at the last stage of his life, and he felt that it was all due to the greatness of his late forefathers or grandfathers. He felt proud, therefore, that he happened to be the descendant of such great devotees. Such pride for the devotees of the Lord is certainly not equal to the puffed-up sense of vanity for material prosperity. The first is reality, whereas the other is false and vain.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The King said: Oh! We are most fortunate among kings since we have been qualified for mercy of the great sages. The family of kings is generally cast off at a great distance from the foot washing place of the brāhmaṇas, since they are involved in impure activities.
Commentary

The King expresses appreciation for the natural compassion towards him that he sees in the sages. We, among kings, are worthy of being blessed by the great souls. This is rare for kings. Smṛti says dūrād ucchiṣṭa-viṇ-mūtra-pādāmbhāṁsi samutsṛjet: one should keep at a distance leftover food, excrement, urine and foot water. (Yājñavalkya-smṛti 1.154) The family of kings is kept at a great distance even from the foot washing place in the hermitage and are not given even permission to remain there. This is because their actions are completely impure.

Indeed, we are the most grateful of all kings trained to get favors from great souls. Generally you sages consider royalty as refuse. Gratitude that names the unusualness of the favor. Naming honor doubles it.
Reflection Questions
  • What unusual favor have I received that deserves precise naming?
  • Where could naming the rarity of a grace deepen my response?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.14

↗
तस्यैव मेऽघस्य परावरेशो व्यासक्तचित्तस्य गृहेष्वभीक्ष्णम् । निर्वेदमूलो द्विजशापरूपो यत्र प्रसक्तो भयमाशु धत्ते ॥ १४ ॥
tasyaiva me ’ghasya parāvareśo
[tasyaiva me ’ghasya paraavaresho]
vyāsakta-cittasya gṛheṣv abhīkṣṇam
[vyaasakta-chittasya griheshv abheekshnam]
nirveda-mūlo dvija-śāpa-rūpo
[nirveda-moolo dvija-shaapa-roopo]
yatra prasakto bhayam āśu dhatte
[yatra prasakto bhayam aashu dhatte]
tasya — his eva — certainly me — mine aghasya — of the sinful parā — transcendental avara — mundane īśaḥ — controller, the Supreme Lord vyāsakta — overly attached cittasya — of the mind gṛheṣu — to family affairs abhīkṣṇam — always nirveda-mūlaḥ — the source of detachment dvija-śāpa — cursing by the brāhmaṇa rūpaḥ — form of yatra — whereupon prasaktaḥ — one who is affected bhayam — fearfulness āśu — very soon dhatte — take place.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyaiva me ’ghasya parāvareśo
tasya
his
eva
certainly
me
mine
vyāsakta-cittasya gṛheṣv abhīkṣṇam
aghasya
of the sinful
nirveda-mūlo dvija-śāpa-rūpo
parā
transcendental
avara
mundane
īśaḥ
controller, the Supreme Lord
vyāsakta
overly attached
cittasya
of the mind
gṛheṣu
to family affairs
abhīkṣṇam
always
nirveda-mūlaḥ
the source of detachment
dvija-śāpa
cursing by the brāhmaṇa
rūpaḥ
form of
yatra prasakto bhayam āśu dhatte
yatra
whereupon
prasaktaḥ
one who is affected
bhayam
fearfulness
āśu
very soon
dhatte
take place.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, the controller of both the transcendental and mundane worlds, has graciously overtaken me in the form of a brāhmaṇa’s curse. Due to my being too much attached to family life, the Lord, in order to save me, has appeared before me in such a way that only out of fear I will detach myself from the world.

Mahārāja Parīkṣit, although born in a family of great devotees, the Pāṇḍavas, and although securely trained in transcendental attachment for the association of the Lord, still found the allurement of mundane family life so strong that he had to be detached by a plan of the Lord. Such direct action is taken by the Lord in the case of a special devotee. Mahārāja Parīkṣit could understand this by the presence of the topmost transcendentalists in the universe. The Lord resides with His devotees, and therefore the presence of the great saints indicated the presence of the Lord. The King therefore welcomed the presence of the great ṛṣis as a mark of favor of the Supreme Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
For me, whose impure action was the sin of disrespecting an innocent brāhmaṇa, and whose heart was very attached to family life, the Lord has come in the form of the brāhmaṇa’s curse, which has become the cause of detachment from material life. By the Lord’s presence the attached person quickly becomes fearless.
Commentary

Impure action (tasya eva) was in my case a great sin (aghasya), since I disrespected the brāhmaṇa by putting a snake around his neck. The Lord (parāvareśaḥ—the Lord who is distant and near) in order to show how he delivers the most fallen, has come in the form of the curse of the brāhmaṇa to my side. He is the cause of detachment from the world (nirveda-mūlaḥ). Masculine form of mūlam instead of neuter form is poetic license. He infers that the cause of detachment is the coming of the great sages, for where the Lord comes, there his devotees naturally come. Where the Lord resides, materially attached people quickly become fearless.

The Supreme Lord, controller of both worlds, has graciously overtaken me in the form of a brāhmaṇa's curse. Due to my attachment to family life, He sent this to save me. Reframing of disaster as merciful intervention.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'disaster' might be the Lord's merciful intervention I'm refusing to receive that way?
  • Where could a reframe save me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.15

↗
तं मोपयातं प्रतियन्तु विप्रा गङ्गा च देवी धृतचित्तमीशे । द्विजोपसृष्ट: कुहकस्तक्षको वा दशत्वलं गायत विष्णुगाथा: ॥ १५ ॥
taṁ mopayātaṁ pratiyantu viprā
[tam mopayaatam pratiyantu vipraa]
gaṅgā ca devī dhṛta-cittam īśe
[gangaa cha devee dhrita-chittam eeshe]
dvijopasṛṣṭaḥ kuhakas takṣako vā
[dvijopasrishtah kuhakas takshako vaa]
daśatv alaṁ gāyata viṣṇu-gāthāḥ
[dashatv alam gaayata vishnu-gaathaah]
tam — for that reason mā — me upayātam — taken shelter of pratiyantu — just accept me viprāḥ — O brāhmaṇas gaṅgā — mother Ganges ca — also devī — direct representative of the Lord dhṛta — taken into cittam — heart īśe — unto the Lord dvija-upasṛṣṭaḥ — created by the brāhmaṇa kuhakaḥ — something magical takṣakaḥ — the snake-bird vā — either daśatu — let it bite alam — without further delay gāyata — please go on singing viṣṇu-gāthāḥ — narration of the deeds of Viṣṇu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ mopayātaṁ pratiyantu viprā
tam
for that reason
mā
me
upayātam
taken shelter of
pratiyantu
just accept me
viprāḥ
O brāhmaṇas
gaṅgā ca devī dhṛta-cittam īśe
gaṅgā
mother Ganges
ca
also
devī
direct representative of the Lord
dhṛta
taken into
cittam
heart
īśe
unto the Lord
dvijopasṛṣṭaḥ kuhakas takṣako vā
dvija-upasṛṣṭaḥ
created by the brāhmaṇa
kuhakaḥ
something magical
takṣakaḥ
the snake-bird
vā
either
daśatv alaṁ gāyata viṣṇu-gāthāḥ
daśatu
let it bite
alam
without further delay
gāyata
please go on singing
viṣṇu-gāthāḥ
narration of the deeds of Viṣṇu.
O brāhmaṇas, just accept me as a completely surrendered soul, and let mother Ganges, the representative of the Lord, also accept me in that way, for I have already taken the lotus feet of the Lord into my heart. Let the snake-bird — or whatever magical thing the brāhmaṇa created — bite me at once. I only desire that you all continue singing the deeds of Lord Viṣṇu.

As soon as one is given up completely unto the lotus feet of the Supreme Lord, he is not at all afraid of death. The atmosphere created by the presence of great devotees of the Lord on the bank of the Ganges and Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s complete acceptance of the Lord’s lotus feet were sufficient guarantee to the King for going back to Godhead. He thus became absolutely free from all fear of death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The brāhmaṇas and Gaṅgā-devī should know that I am surrendered, and have dedicated my heart to the Lord. Let the snake released by the brāhmaṇa, even if it is an imposter, bite me. Please sing topics concerning the Lord.
Commentary

He prays to the sages in two verses. Mā means “me.” The sages should know that I am surrendered. Gaṅgā as a devatā (devī) should also know this. Vā indicates his disregard for countermeasures. Gāthāḥ means stories.

Accept me as a completely surrendered soul. Let Mother Ganges accept me. I have already taken the Lord into my heart. Let the snake-bird bite at once. Welcome the means of release.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'snake-bird' am I afraid to welcome as the means of release?
  • Where could I stop bargaining with the means and just receive them?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.16

↗
पुनश्च भूयाद्भगवत्यनन्ते रति: प्रसङ्गश्च तदाश्रयेषु । महत्सु यां यामुपयामि सृष्टिं मैत्र्यस्तु सर्वत्र नमो द्विजेभ्य: ॥ १६ ॥
punaś ca bhūyād bhagavaty anante
[punash cha bhooyaad bhagavaty anante]
ratiḥ prasaṅgaś ca tad-āśrayeṣu
[ratih prasangash cha tad-aashrayeshu]
mahatsu yāṁ yām upayāmi sṛṣṭiṁ
[mahatsu yaam yaam upayaami srishtim]
maitry astu sarvatra namo dvijebhyaḥ
[maitry astu sarvatra namo dvijebhyah]
punaḥ — again ca — and bhūyāt — let it be bhagavati — unto Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa anante — who has unlimited potency ratiḥ — attracting prasaṅgaḥ — association ca — also tat — His āśrayeṣu — with those who are His devotees mahatsu — within the material creation yām yām — wherever upayāmi — I may take sṛṣṭim — my birth maitrī — friendly relation astu — let it be sarvatra — everywhere namaḥ — my obeisances dvijebhyaḥ — unto the brāhmaṇas..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
punaś ca bhūyād bhagavaty anante
punaḥ
again
ca
and
bhūyāt
let it be
bhagavati
unto Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa
anante
who has unlimited potency
ratiḥ prasaṅgaś ca tad-āśrayeṣu
ratiḥ
attracting
prasaṅgaḥ
association
ca
also
tat
His
āśrayeṣu
with those who are His devotees
mahatsu yāṁ yām upayāmi sṛṣṭiṁ
mahatsu
within the material creation
yām yām
wherever
upayāmi
I may take
sṛṣṭim
my birth
maitry astu sarvatra namo dvijebhyaḥ
maitrī
friendly relation
astu
let it be
sarvatra
everywhere
namaḥ
my obeisances
dvijebhyaḥ
unto the brāhmaṇas..
Again, offering obeisances unto all you brāhmaṇas, I pray that if I should again take my birth in the material world I will have complete attachment to the unlimited Lord Kṛṣṇa, association with His devotees and friendly relations with all living beings.

That a devotee of the Lord is the only perfect living being is explained herein by Mahārāja Parīkṣit. A devotee of the Lord is no one’s enemy, although there may be many enemies of a devotee. A devotee of the Lord does not like to associate with nondevotees, although he has no enmity with them. He desires association with the devotees of the Lord. This is perfectly natural because birds of the same feather mix together. And the most important function of a devotee is to have complete attachment for Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the father of all living beings. As a good son of the father behaves in a friendly way with all his other brothers, so also the devotee of the Lord, being a good son of the supreme father, Lord Kṛṣṇa, sees all other living beings in relation with the supreme father. He tries to bring back the upstart sons of the father to a saner stage and to get them to accept the supreme fatherhood of God. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was certainly going back to Godhead, but even if he were not to go back, he prayed for a pattern of life which is the most perfect way in the material world. A pure devotee does not desire the company of a personality as great as Brahmā, but he prefers the association of a petty living being, provided he is a devotee of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
On the other hand, in whatever birth I receive, may I have rati for the unlimited Lord, excellent association with his devotees who take shelter of him and friendship with all living beings! I offer respects to the brāhmaṇas.
Commentary

Punar ca means “on the other hand.” In whatever birth I take, may I have rati for the Lord and excellent association (prasaṅgaḥ) with his devotees, and friendship with all living entities! May these three desires be fulfilled! After praying for these, he then offers his respects. Or offering respects can be considered a fourth wish, out of repentance for disrespecting a brāhmaṇa. May I have respect for the brāhmaṇas! (dvijebhyaḥ namo bhūyāt).

If I take birth again in the material world, may I have complete attachment to Kṛṣṇa, association with His devotees, and friendly relations with all. The right prayer for the in-between. The seeds of the next birth are sown now.
Reflection Questions
  • What seeds for a next chapter — this life or another — am I planting now?
  • Where could prayer for ongoing devotion shape what comes?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.17

↗
इति स्म राजाध्यवसाययुक्त: प्राचीनमूलेषु कुशेषु धीर: । उदङ्‍मुखो दक्षिणकूल आस्ते समुद्रपत्‍न्‍या: स्वसुतन्यस्तभार: ॥ १७ ॥
iti sma rājādhyavasāya-yuktaḥ
[iti sma raajaadhyavasaaya-yuktah]
prācīna-mūleṣu kuśeṣu dhīraḥ
[praacheena-mooleshu kusheshu dheerah]
udaṅ-mukho dakṣiṇa-kūla āste
[udan-mukho dakshina-koola aaste]
samudra-patnyāḥ sva-suta-nyasta-bhāraḥ
[samudra-patnyaah sva-suta-nyasta-bhaarah]
iti — thus sma — as in the past rājā — the King adhyavasāya — perseverance yuktaḥ — being engaged prācīna — eastern mūleṣu — with the root kuśeṣu — on a seat made of kuśa straw dhīraḥ — self-controlled udaṅ-mukhaḥ — facing the northern side dakṣiṇa — on the southern kūle — bank āste — situated samudra — the sea patnyāḥ — wife of (the Ganges) sva — own suta — son nyasta — given over bhāraḥ — the charge of administration.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti sma rājādhyavasāya-yuktaḥ
iti
thus
sma
as in the past
rājā
the King
adhyavasāya
perseverance
yuktaḥ
being engaged
prācīna-mūleṣu kuśeṣu dhīraḥ
prācīna
eastern
mūleṣu
with the root
kuśeṣu
on a seat made of kuśa straw
dhīraḥ
self-controlled
udaṅ-mukho dakṣiṇa-kūla āste
udaṅ-mukhaḥ
facing the northern side
dakṣiṇa
on the southern
kūle
bank
āste
situated
samudra-patnyāḥ sva-suta-nyasta-bhāraḥ
samudra
the sea
patnyāḥ
wife of (the Ganges)
sva
own
suta
son
nyasta
given over
bhāraḥ
the charge of administration.
In perfect self-control, Mahārāja Parīkṣit sat down on a seat of straw, with straw-roots facing the east, placed on the southern bank of the Ganges, and he himself faced the north. Just previously he had given charge of his kingdom over to his son.

The River Ganges is celebrated as the wife of the sea. The seat of kuśa straw is considered to be sanctified if the straw is taken out of the earth complete with root, and if the root is pointed toward the east it is considered to be auspicious. Facing the north is still more favorable for attaining spiritual success. Mahārāja Parīkṣit handed over the charge of administration to his son before leaving home. He was thus fully equipped for all favorable conditions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having decided in this way the wise King, entrusting the country to his son, sat down facing north on kuśa grass with tips facing east, on the right bank of the river.
Commentary

Samudra-patnyāḥ means “of the Gaṅgā.”

In perfect self-control, Parīkṣit sat on straw with straw-roots facing east, on the Ganges' southern bank, facing north. He had given the kingdom to his son. Outer arrangement supports inner. Detail of posture is not trivia.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I underestimating how outer arrangement supports inner state?
  • What detail of posture could I refine today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.18

↗
एवं च तस्मिन्नरदेवदेवे प्रायोपविष्टे दिवि देवसङ्घा: । प्रशस्य भूमौ व्यकिरन् प्रसूनै- र्मुदा मुहुर्दुन्दुभयश्च नेदु: ॥ १८ ॥
evaṁ ca tasmin nara-deva-deve
[evam cha tasmin nara-deva-deve]
prāyopaviṣṭe divi deva-saṅghāḥ
[praayopavishte divi deva-sanghaah]
praśasya bhūmau vyakiran prasūnair
[prashasya bhoomau vyakiran prasoonair]
mudā muhur dundubhayaś ca neduḥ
[mudaa muhur dundubhayash cha neduh]
evam — thus ca — and tasmin — in that nara-deva-deve — upon the King’s prāya-upaviṣṭe — being engaged in fasting to death divi — in the sky deva — demigods saṅghāḥ — all of them praśasya — having praised the action bhūmau — on the earth vyakiran — scattered prasūnaiḥ — with flowers mudā — in pleasure muhuḥ — continually dundubhayaḥ — celestial drums ca — also neduḥ — beaten.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ ca tasmin nara-deva-deve
evam
thus
ca
and
tasmin
in that
nara-deva-deve
upon the King’s
prāyopaviṣṭe divi deva-saṅghāḥ
prāya-upaviṣṭe
being engaged in fasting to death
divi
in the sky
deva
demigods
saṅghāḥ
all of them
praśasya bhūmau vyakiran prasūnair
praśasya
having praised the action
bhūmau
on the earth
vyakiran
scattered
prasūnaiḥ
with flowers
mudā muhur dundubhayaś ca neduḥ
mudā
in pleasure
muhuḥ
continually
dundubhayaḥ
celestial drums
ca
also
neduḥ
beaten.
Thus the King, Mahārāja Parīkṣit, sat to fast until death. All the demigods of the higher planets praised the King’s actions and in pleasure continually scattered flowers over the earth and beat celestial drums.

Even up to the time of Mahārāja Parīkṣit there were interplanetary communications, and the news of Mahārāja Parīkṣit’s fasting unto death to attain salvation reached the higher planets in the sky where the intelligent demigods live. The demigods are more luxurious than human beings, but all of them are obedient to the orders of the Supreme Lord. There is no one in the heavenly planets who is an atheist or nonbeliever. Thus any devotee of the Lord on the surface of the earth is always praised by them, and in the case of Mahārāja Parīkṣit they were greatly delighted and thus gave tokens of honor by scattering flowers over the earth and by beating celestial drums. A demigod takes pleasure in seeing someone go back to Godhead. He is always pleased with a devotee of the Lord, so much so that by his adhidaivic powers he may help the devotees in all respects. And by their actions, the Lord is pleased with them. There is an invisible chain of complete cooperation between the Lord, the demigods and the devotee of the Lord on earth.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the best of the kings sat fasting, the devatās in the sky showered the earth with flowers in praise and continually drums sounded in joy.
Commentary

Vyakiran means that they made a shower. The drums sounded spontaneously (neduḥ) by themselves.

The King sat to fast until death. All the demigods praised the King's actions and scattered flowers and beat celestial drums. Higher worlds notice noble human acts. Beauty is rained when we choose well.
Reflection Questions
  • What act of mine recently might have been noticed by the higher world?
  • Where could I act knowing I am being witnessed by more than I see?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.19

↗
महर्षयो वै समुपागता ये प्रशस्य साध्वित्यनुमोदमाना: । ऊचु: प्रजानुग्रहशीलसारा यदुत्तमश्लोकगुणाभिरूपम् ॥ १९ ॥
maharṣayo vai samupāgatā ye
[maharshayo vai samupaagataa ye]
praśasya sādhv ity anumodamānāḥ
[prashasya saadhv ity anumodamaanaah]
ūcuḥ prajānugraha-śīla-sārā
[oochuh prajaanugraha-sheela-saaraa]
yad uttama-śloka-guṇābhirūpam
[yad uttama-shloka-gunaabhiroopam]
maharṣayaḥ — the great sages vai — as a matter of course samupāgatāḥ — assembled there ye — those who praśasya — by praising sādhu — quite all right iti — thus anumodamānāḥ — all approving ūcuḥ — said prajā-anugraha — doing good to the living being śīla-sārāḥ — qualitatively powerful yat — because uttama-śloka — one who is praised by selected poems guṇa-abhirūpam — as beautiful as godly qualities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maharṣayo vai samupāgatā ye
maharṣayaḥ
the great sages
vai
as a matter of course
samupāgatāḥ
assembled there
ye
those who
praśasya sādhv ity anumodamānāḥ
praśasya
by praising
sādhu
quite all right
iti
thus
anumodamānāḥ
all approving
ūcuḥ prajānugraha-śīla-sārā
ūcuḥ
said
prajā-anugraha
doing good to the living being
śīla-sārāḥ
qualitatively powerful
yad uttama-śloka-guṇābhirūpam
yat
because
uttama-śloka
one who is praised by selected poems
guṇa-abhirūpam
as beautiful as godly qualities.
All the great sages who were assembled there also praised the decision of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, and they expressed their approval by saying “Very good.” Naturally the sages are inclined to do good to common men, for they have all the qualitative powers of the Supreme Lord. Therefore they were very much pleased to see Mahārāja Parīkṣit, a devotee of the Lord, and they spoke as follows.

The natural beauty of a living being is enhanced by rising up to the platform of devotional service. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was absorbed in attachment for Lord Kṛṣṇa. Seeing this, the great sages assembled were very pleased, and they expressed their approval by saying “Very good.” Such sages are naturally inclined to do good to the common man, and when they see a personality like Mahārāja Parīkṣit advance in devotional service, their pleasure knows no bounds, and they offer all blessings in their power. The devotional service of the Lord is so auspicious that all demigods and sages, up to the Lord Himself, become pleased with the devotee, and therefore the devotee finds everything auspicious. All inauspicious matters are removed from the path of a progressive devotee. Meeting all the great sages at the time of death was certainly auspicious for Mahārāja Parīkṣit, and thus he was blessed by the so-called curse of a brāhmaṇa’s boy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because the great sages gathered there had the quality and ability to give mercy to the citizens, they approved of his decision by praising it, and spoke to the King who was beautiful with the qualities of Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

Because they had the quality and ability to give mercy to the people (yad prajānugraha -śīla-sārāḥ), they approved of his decision; they spoke to the King who was beautiful (anurūpam) with the qualities of Kṛṣṇa. Or they said that he would have qualities like those of Kṛṣṇa.

All the great sages praised Parīkṣit's decision saying 'Very good!' Naturally sages do good to common men, possessing godly qualities of compassion. Encouragement from the wise is itself a benediction.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'very good' would mean the most to me right now?
  • Where could I be more generous with that phrase toward others?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.20

↗
न वा इदं राजर्षिवर्य चित्रं भवत्सु कृष्णं समनुव्रतेषु । येऽध्यासनं राजकिरीटजुष्टं सद्यो जहुर्भगवत्पार्श्वकामा: ॥ २० ॥
na vā idaṁ rājarṣi-varya citraṁ
[na vaa idam raajarshi-varya chitram]
bhavatsu kṛṣṇaṁ samanuvrateṣu
[bhavatsu krishnam samanuvrateshu]
ye ’dhyāsanaṁ rāja-kirīṭa-juṣṭaṁ
[ye ’dhyaasanam raaja-kireeta-jushtam]
sadyo jahur bhagavat-pārśva-kāmāḥ
[sadyo jahur bhagavat-paarshva-kaamaah]
na — neither vā — like this idam — this rājarṣi — saintly king varya — the chief citram — astonishing bhavatsu — unto all of you kṛṣṇam — Lord Kṛṣṇa samanuvrateṣu — unto those who are strictly in the line of ye — who adhyāsanam — seated on the throne rāja-kirīṭa — helmets of kings juṣṭam — decorated sadyaḥ — immediately jahuḥ — gave up bhagavat — the Personality of Godhead pārśva-kāmāḥ — desiring to achieve association.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na vā idaṁ rājarṣi-varya citraṁ
na
neither
vā
like this
idam
this
rājarṣi
saintly king
varya
the chief
citram
astonishing
bhavatsu kṛṣṇaṁ samanuvrateṣu
bhavatsu
unto all of you
kṛṣṇam
Lord Kṛṣṇa
samanuvrateṣu
unto those who are strictly in the line of
ye ’dhyāsanaṁ rāja-kirīṭa-juṣṭaṁ
ye
who
sadyo jahur bhagavat-pārśva-kāmāḥ
adhyāsanam
seated on the throne
rāja-kirīṭa
helmets of kings
juṣṭam
decorated
sadyaḥ
immediately
jahuḥ
gave up
bhagavat
the Personality of Godhead
pārśva-kāmāḥ
desiring to achieve association.
[The sages said:] O chief of all the saintly kings of the Pāṇḍu dynasty who are strictly in the line of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa! It is not at all astonishing that you give up your throne, which is decorated with the helmets of many kings, to achieve eternal association with the Personality of Godhead.

Foolish politicians who hold political administrative posts think that the temporary posts they occupy are the highest material gain of life, and therefore they stick to those posts even up to the last moment of life, without knowing that achievement of liberation as one of the associates of the Lord in His eternal abode is the highest gain of life. The human life is meant for achieving this end. The Lord has assured us in the Bhagavad-gītā many times that going back to Godhead, His eternal abode, is the highest achievement. Prahlāda Mahārāja, while praying to Lord Nṛsiṁha, said, “O my Lord, I am very much afraid of the materialistic way of life, and I am not the least afraid of Your present ghastly ferocious feature as Nṛsiṁha-deva. This materialistic way of life is something like a grinding stone, and we are being crushed by it. We have fallen into this horrible whirlpool of the tossing waves of life, and thus, my Lord, I pray at Your lotus feet to call me back to Your eternal abode as one of Your servitors. This is the summit liberation of this materialistic way of life. I have very bitter experience of the materialistic way of life. In whichever species of life I have taken birth, compelled by the force of my own activities, I have very painfully experienced two things, namely separation from my beloved and meeting with what is not wanted. And to counteract them, the remedies which I undertook were more dangerous than the disease itself. So I drift from one point to another, birth after birth, and I pray to You therefore to give me a shelter at Your lotus feet.”

The Pāṇḍava kings, who are more than many saints of the world, knew the bitter results of the materialistic way of life. They were never captivated by the glare of the imperial throne they occupied, and they sought always the opportunity of being called by the Lord to associate with Him eternally. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was the worthy grandson of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira gave up the imperial throne to his grandson, and similarly Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the grandson of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, gave up the imperial throne to his son Janamejaya. That is the way of all the kings in the dynasty because they are all strictly in the line of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Thus the devotees of the Lord are never enchanted by the glare of materialistic life, and they live impartially, unattached to the objects of the false, illusory materialistic way of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of kings! It is not surprising that those desiring to associate with the Lord, born in the Pāṇḍava family and devoted solely to Kṛṣṇa, immediately gave up the royal throne served by kings’ crowns.
Commentary

This refers to Yudhiṣṭhira and his family.

The sages said: O chief of saintly kings of the Pāṇḍu dynasty, strictly in Kṛṣṇa's line — it is not astonishing that you give up your throne for the Lord's lotus feet. Surrender from the saintly is not surprising. Expectation calls forth excellence.
Reflection Questions
  • What is expected of me by my lineage or community that I have not yet stepped into?
  • Where could expectation be invitation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.21

↗
सर्वे वयं तावदिहास्महेऽथ कलेवरं यावदसौ विहाय । लोकं परं विरजस्कं विशोकं यास्यत्ययं भागवतप्रधान: ॥ २१ ॥
sarve vayaṁ tāvad ihāsmahe ’tha
[sarve vayam taavad ihaasmahe ’tha]
kalevaraṁ yāvad asau vihāya
[kalevaram yaavad asau vihaaya]
lokaṁ paraṁ virajaskaṁ viśokaṁ
[lokam param virajaskam vishokam]
yāsyaty ayaṁ bhāgavata-pradhānaḥ
[yaasyaty ayam bhaagavata-pradhaanah]
sarve — all vayam — of us tāvat — as long as iha — at this place āsmahe — shall stay atha — hereafter kalevaram — the body yāvat — so long asau — the King vihāya — giving up lokam — the planet param — the supreme virajaskam — completely free from mundane contamination viśokam — completely freed from all kinds of lamentation yāsyati — returns ayam — this bhāgavata — devotee pradhānaḥ — the foremost.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarve vayaṁ tāvad ihāsmahe ’tha
sarve
all
vayam
of us
tāvat
as long as
iha
at this place
āsmahe
shall stay
kalevaraṁ yāvad asau vihāya
lokaṁ paraṁ virajaskaṁ viśokaṁ
yāsyaty ayaṁ bhāgavata-pradhānaḥ
atha
hereafter
kalevaram
the body
yāvat
so long
asau
the King
vihāya
giving up
lokam
the planet
param
the supreme
virajaskam
completely free from mundane contamination
viśokam
completely freed from all kinds of lamentation
yāsyati
returns
ayam
this
bhāgavata
devotee
pradhānaḥ
the foremost.
We shall all wait here until the foremost devotee of the Lord, Mahārāja Parīkṣit, returns to the supreme planet, which is completely free from all mundane contamination and all kinds of lamentation.

Beyond the limitation of the material creation, which is compared to the cloud in the sky, there is the paravyoma, or the spiritual sky, full of planets called Vaikuṇṭhas. Such Vaikuṇṭha planets are also differently known as the Puruṣottamaloka, Acyutaloka, Trivikramaloka, Hṛṣīkeśaloka, Keśavaloka, Aniruddhaloka, Mādhavaloka, Pradyumnaloka, Saṅkarṣaṇaloka, Śrīdharaloka, Vāsudevaloka, Ayodhyāloka, Dvārakāloka and many other millions of spiritual lokas wherein the Personality of Godhead predominates; all the living entities there are liberated souls with spiritual bodies as good as that of the Lord. There is no material contamination; everything there is spiritual, and therefore there is nothing objectively lamentable. They are full of transcendental bliss, and are without birth, death, old age and disease. And amongst all the above-mentioned Vaikuṇṭhalokas, there is one supreme loka called Goloka Vṛndāvana, which is the abode of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and His specific associates. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was destined to achieve this particular loka, and the great ṛṣis assembled there could foresee this. All of them consulted among themselves about the great departure of the great King, and they wanted to see him up to the last moment because they would no more be able to see such a great devotee of the Lord. When a great devotee of the Lord passes away, there is nothing to be lamented because the devotee is destined to enter into the kingdom of God. But the sorry plight is that such great devotees leave our sight, and therefore there is every reason to be sorry. As the Lord is rarely to be seen by our present eyes, so also are the great devotees. The great ṛṣis, therefore, correctly decided to remain on the spot till the last moment.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
We will all remain here until the King, the best of the devotees, gives up his body and attains the supreme planet which is without grief and passion.
Commentary

Hearing the resolve of the king, they express their resolve to the king. They consulted each other and spoke this verse.

We shall all wait here until the foremost devotee returns to the supreme planet, completely free from mundane contamination and lamentation. The witnesses commit to the entire vigil. Some endings deserve a full audience.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose vigil am I committed to seeing through?
  • Where am I leaving before the end?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.22

↗
आश्रुत्य तद‍ृषिगणवच: परीक्षित् समं मधुच्युद् गुरु चाव्यलीकम् । आभाषतैनानभिनन्द्य युक्तान् शुश्रूषमाणश्चरितानि विष्णो: ॥ २२ ॥
āśrutya tad ṛṣi-gaṇa-vacaḥ parīkṣit
[aashrutya tad rishi-gana-vachah pareekshit]
samaṁ madhu-cyud guru cāvyalīkam
[samam madhu-chyud guru chaavyaleekam]
ābhāṣatainān abhinandya yuktān
[aabhaashatainaan abhinandya yuktaan]
śuśrūṣamāṇaś caritāni viṣṇoḥ
[shushrooshamaanash charitaani vishnoh]
āśrutya — just after hearing tat — that ṛṣi-gaṇa — the sages assembled vacaḥ — speaking parīkṣit — Mahārāja Parīkṣit samam — impartial madhu-cyut — sweet to hear guru — grave ca — also avyalīkam — perfectly true ābhāṣata — said enān — all of them abhinandya — congratulated yuktān — appropriately presented śuśrūṣamāṇaḥ — being desirous to hear caritāni — activities of viṣṇoḥ — the Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āśrutya tad ṛṣi-gaṇa-vacaḥ parīkṣit
āśrutya
just after hearing
tat
that
ṛṣi-gaṇa
the sages assembled
vacaḥ
speaking
parīkṣit
Mahārāja Parīkṣit
samaṁ madhu-cyud guru cāvyalīkam
samam
impartial
madhu-cyut
sweet to hear
guru
grave
ca
also
avyalīkam
perfectly true
ābhāṣatainān abhinandya yuktān
ābhāṣata
said
enān
all of them
abhinandya
congratulated
yuktān
appropriately presented
śuśrūṣamāṇaś caritāni viṣṇoḥ
śuśrūṣamāṇaḥ
being desirous to hear
caritāni
activities of
viṣṇoḥ
the Personality of Godhead.
All that was spoken by the great sages was very sweet to hear, full of meaning and appropriately presented as perfectly true. So after hearing them, Mahārāja Parīkṣit, desiring to hear of the activities of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, congratulated the great sages.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hearing the words of the sages, which were impartial, flowing with nectar, profound in meaning and true, he then spoke with a desire to hear about the activities of the Lord after offering respect to the sages.
Commentary

Samam means “impartial.” This is expressed when they said, “We will remain here.” The words were flowing with honey when they praised him as the best of the devotees. The words were profound because they mentioned the planet devoid of passion (not directly saying the Lord’ planet). The words were true because they said he would attain the planet of the Lord. Hearing these four types of statements, he offered respects to them. Virajaska-lokam means the planet of the Lord. He would attain only the planet of the Lord. This is understood from the phrases in the previous verse (verse 20). Bhavatsu kṛṣṇaṁ samanuvrateṣu: the Pāṇḍavas were dedicated only to the Lord. Bhagavat-pārśva-kāmā: they desired association with the Lord.

All spoken by the great sages was sweet to hear, meaningful, perfectly true. Parīkṣit, desiring to hear of Kṛṣṇa's activities, was pleased and praised them. Receiving wisdom with pleasure deepens the giving.
Reflection Questions
  • How do I receive wisdom — pleased, tolerant, or grudging?
  • Where could pleasure in receiving multiply the giving?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.23

↗
समागता: सर्वत एव सर्वे वेदा यथा मूर्तिधरास्त्रिपृष्ठे । नेहाथ नामुत्र च कश्चनार्थ ऋते परानुग्रहमात्मशीलम् ॥ २३ ॥
samāgatāḥ sarvata eva sarve
[samaagataah sarvata eva sarve]
vedā yathā mūrti-dharās tri-pṛṣṭhe
[vedaa yathaa moorti-dharaas tri-prishthe]
nehātha nāmutra ca kaścanārtha
[nehaatha naamutra cha kashchanaartha]
ṛte parānugraham ātma-śīlam
[rite paraanugraham aatma-sheelam]
samāgatāḥ — assembled sarvataḥ — from all directions eva — certainly sarve — all of you vedāḥ — supreme knowledge yathā — as mūrti-dharāḥ — personified tri-pṛṣṭhe — on the planet of Brahmā (which is situated above the three planetary systems, namely the upper, intermediate and lower worlds) na — not iha — in this world atha — thereafter na — nor amutra — in the other world ca — also kaścana — any other arthaḥ — interest ṛte — save and except para — others anugraham — doing good to ātma-śīlam — own nature.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
samāgatāḥ sarvata eva sarve
samāgatāḥ
assembled
sarvataḥ
from all directions
eva
certainly
sarve
all of you
vedā yathā mūrti-dharās tri-pṛṣṭhe
vedāḥ
supreme knowledge
yathā
as
mūrti-dharāḥ
personified
tri-pṛṣṭhe
on the planet of Brahmā (which is situated above the three planetary systems, namely the upper, intermediate and lower worlds)
nehātha nāmutra ca kaścanārtha
na
not
iha
in this world
ṛte parānugraham ātma-śīlam
atha
thereafter
na
nor
amutra
in the other world
ca
also
kaścana
any other
arthaḥ
interest
ṛte
save and except
para
others
anugraham
doing good to
ātma-śīlam
own nature.
The King said: O great sages, you have all very kindly assembled here, having come from all parts of the universe. You are all as good as supreme knowledge personified, who resides in the planet above the three worlds [Satyaloka]. Consequently you are naturally inclined to do good to others, and but for this you have no interest, either in this life or in the next.

Six kinds of opulences, namely wealth, strength, fame, beauty, knowledge and renunciation, are all originally the different attributes pertaining to the Absolute Personality of Godhead. The living beings, who are part-and-parcel entities of the Supreme Being, have all these attributes partially, up to the full strength of seventy-eight percent. In the material world these attributes (up to seventy-eight percent of the Lord’s attributes) are covered by the material energy, as the sun is covered by a cloud. The covered strength of the sun is very dim, compared to the original glare, and similarly the original color of the living beings with such attributes becomes almost extinct. There are three planetary systems, namely the lower worlds, the intermediate worlds and the upper worlds. The human beings on earth are situated at the beginning of the intermediate worlds, but living beings like Brahmā and his contemporaries live in the upper worlds, of which the topmost is Satyaloka. In Satyaloka the inhabitants are fully cognizant of Vedic wisdom, and thus the mystic cloud of material energy is cleared. Therefore they are known as the Vedas personified. Such persons, being fully aware of knowledge both mundane and transcendental, have no interest in either the mundane or transcendental worlds. They are practically desireless devotees. In the mundane world they have nothing to achieve, and in the transcendental world they are full in themselves. Then why do they come to the mundane world? They descend to different planets as messiahs by the order of the Lord to deliver the fallen souls. On the earth they come down and do good to the people of the world in different circumstances under different climatic influences. They have nothing to do in this world save and except reclaim the fallen souls rotting in material existence, deluded by material energy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You who have gathered here from many places are full knowledge like the Vedas situated in Satya-loka, above the three worlds. And you have no goal except to give mercy to others in this world and in the next. Actually that is your very nature.
Commentary

You are like the Vedas situated in Satya-loka (tri-pṛṣṭhe). Having spoken of their great knowledge, he speaks of their great mercy. You have no goal except to give mercy to others. Is that their goal? No, it is their nature.

You have kindly assembled here from all parts of the universe. You are good as supreme knowledge personified, residing in Satyaloka. Consequently we are your guests. Receive teachers as honored guests of your own life.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom in my life am I receiving with the honor due to a guest of wisdom?
  • Where could I upgrade my hospitality to teachers?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.24

↗
ततश्च व: पृच्छ्‍यमिमं विपृच्छे विश्रभ्य विप्रा इति कृत्यतायाम् । सर्वात्मना म्रियमाणैश्च कृत्यं शुद्धं च तत्रामृशताभियुक्ता: ॥ २४ ॥
tataś ca vaḥ pṛcchyam imaṁ vipṛcche
[tatash cha vah prichchyam imam viprichche]
viśrabhya viprā iti kṛtyatāyām
[vishrabhya vipraa iti krityataayaam]
sarvātmanā mriyamāṇaiś ca kṛtyaṁ
[sarvaatmanaa mriyamaanaish cha krityam]
śuddhaṁ ca tatrāmṛśatābhiyuktāḥ
[shuddham cha tatraamrishataabhiyuktaah]
tataḥ — as such ca — and vaḥ — unto you pṛcchyam — that which is to be asked imam — this vipṛcche — beg to ask you viśrabhya — trustworthy viprāḥ — brāhmaṇas iti — thus kṛtyatāyām — out of all different duties sarva-ātmanā — by everyone mriyamāṇaiḥ — especially those who are just about to die ca — and kṛtyam — dutiful śuddham — perfectly correct ca — and tatra — therein āmṛśata — by complete deliberation abhiyuktāḥ — just befitting.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataś ca vaḥ pṛcchyam imaṁ vipṛcche
tataḥ
as such
ca
and
vaḥ
unto you
pṛcchyam
that which is to be asked
imam
this
vipṛcche
beg to ask you
viśrabhya viprā iti kṛtyatāyām
viśrabhya
trustworthy
viprāḥ
brāhmaṇas
iti
thus
kṛtyatāyām
out of all different duties
sarvātmanā mriyamāṇaiś ca kṛtyaṁ
sarva-ātmanā
by everyone
mriyamāṇaiḥ
especially those who are just about to die
ca
and
kṛtyam
dutiful
śuddhaṁ ca tatrāmṛśatābhiyuktāḥ
śuddham
perfectly correct
ca
and
tatra
therein
āmṛśata
by complete deliberation
abhiyuktāḥ
just befitting.
O trustworthy brāhmaṇas, I now ask you about my immediate duty. Please, after proper deliberation, tell me of the unalloyed duty of everyone in all circumstances, and specifically of those who are just about to die.

In this verse the King has placed two questions before the learned sages. The first question is what is the duty of everyone in all circumstances, and the second question is what is the specific duty of one who is to die very shortly. Out of the two, the question relating to the dying man is most important because everyone is a dying man, either very shortly or after one hundred years. The duration of life is immaterial, but the duty of a dying man is very important. Mahārāja Parīkṣit placed these two questions before Śukadeva Gosvāmī also on his arrival, and practically the whole of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, beginning from the Second Canto up to the last, the Twelfth Canto, deals with these two questions. The conclusion arrived at thereof is that devotional service of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, as it is confirmed by the Lord Himself in the last phases of the Bhagavad-gītā, is the last word in relation to everyone’s permanent duty in life. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was already aware of this fact, but he wanted the great sages assembled there to unanimously give their verdict on his conviction so that he might be able to go on with his confirmed duty without controversy. He has especially mentioned the word śuddha, or perfectly correct. For transcendental realization or self-realization, many processes are recommended by various classes of philosophers. Some of them are first-class methods, and some of them are second- or third-class methods. The first-class method demands that one give up all other methods and surrender unto the lotus feet of the Lord and thus be saved from all sins and their reactions.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇas! I thus ask about your mercy. That should be determined. Since I have develop faith in your mercy, please consider and tell me in common agreement what is the pure activity, though there are many duties to be performed and many duties for those who are dying.
Commentary

I ask about your mercy---what form will it take? This should be asked; it should be determined (pṛcchyam). Since I have develop faith in that (viśrabhya), decide with common agreement (sarvātmanā), after considering the pure activity for me, though there are many duties to be done in austerity, yoga or jñāna (iti-kṛtyatāyām) and many duties to be done for those who are dying. Decide and tell me (āmṛṣataḥ).

I ask about my immediate duty. Please, after proper deliberation, tell me the unalloyed duty of everyone in all circumstances, and specifically of those just about to die. The dying ask the right question.
Reflection Questions
  • What is my 'immediate duty' that I have been postponing?
  • Where would deliberation by the wise around me sharpen my next step?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.25

↗
तत्राभवद्भगवान् व्यासपुत्रो यद‍ृच्छया गामटमानोऽनपेक्ष: । अलक्ष्यलिङ्गो निजलाभतुष्टो वृतश्च बालैरवधूतवेष: ॥ २५ ॥
tatrābhavad bhagavān vyāsa-putro
[tatraabhavad bhagavaan vyaasa-putro]
yadṛcchayā gām aṭamāno ’napekṣaḥ
[yadrichchayaa gaam atamaano ’napekshah]
alakṣya-liṅgo nija-lābha-tuṣṭo
[alakshya-lingo nija-laabha-tushto]
vṛtaś ca bālair avadhūta-veṣaḥ
[vritash cha baalair avadhoota-veshah]
tatra — there abhavat — appeared bhagavān — powerful vyāsa-putraḥ — son of Vyāsadeva yadṛcchayā — as one desires gām — the earth aṭamānaḥ — while traveling anapekṣaḥ — disinterested alakṣya — unmanifested liṅgaḥ — symptoms nija-lābha — self-realized tuṣṭaḥ — satisfied vṛtaḥ — surrounded ca — and bālaiḥ — by children avadhūta — neglected by others veṣaḥ — dressed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatrābhavad bhagavān vyāsa-putro
tatra
there
abhavat
appeared
bhagavān
powerful
vyāsa-putraḥ
son of Vyāsadeva
yadṛcchayā gām aṭamāno ’napekṣaḥ
yadṛcchayā
as one desires
gām
the earth
aṭamānaḥ
while traveling
anapekṣaḥ
disinterested
alakṣya-liṅgo nija-lābha-tuṣṭo
alakṣya
unmanifested
liṅgaḥ
symptoms
nija-lābha
self-realized
tuṣṭaḥ
satisfied
vṛtaś ca bālair avadhūta-veṣaḥ
vṛtaḥ
surrounded
ca
and
bālaiḥ
by children
avadhūta
neglected by others
veṣaḥ
dressed.
At that moment there appeared the powerful son of Vyāsadeva, who traveled over the earth disinterested and satisfied with himself. He did not manifest any symptoms of belonging to any social order or status of life. He was surrounded with women and children, and he dressed as if others had neglected him.

The word bhagavān is sometimes used in relation with some of the great devotees of the Lord, like Śukadeva Gosvāmī. Such liberated souls are disinterested in the affairs of this material world because they are self-satisfied by the great achievements of devotional service. As explained before, Śukadeva Gosvāmī never accepted any formal spiritual master, nor did he undergo any formal reformatory performances. His father, Vyāsadeva, was his natural spiritual master because Śukadeva Gosvāmī heard Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam from him. After this, he became completely self-satisfied. Thus he was not dependent on any formal process. The formal processes are necessary for those who are expected to reach the stage of complete liberation, but Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī was already in that status by the grace of his father. As a young boy he was expected to be properly dressed, but he went about naked and was uninterested in social customs. He was neglected by the general populace, and inquisitive boys and women surrounded him as if he were a madman. He thus appears on the scene while traveling on the earth of his own accord. It appears that upon the inquiry of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the great sages were not unanimous in their decision as to what was to be done. For spiritual salvation there were many prescriptions according to the different modes of different persons. But the ultimate aim of life is to attain the highest perfectional stage of devotional service to the Lord. As doctors differ, so also sages differ in their different prescriptions. While such things were going on, the great and powerful son of Vyāsadeva appeared on the scene.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The great son of Vyāsa, Śukadeva, wandering the earth as he pleased, ignoring everyone, without indications of any āśrama, satisfied with his own attainment, wearing discarded cloth, and surrounded by children, arrived at that time.
Commentary

While the various sages, without agreement about the various processes of sacrifice, yoga, austerity, and charity, desired the appearance of Śukadeva in their minds, and were glancing at the path with their eyes, Śukadeva arrived.

At that moment the powerful son of Vyāsa appeared, traveling over the earth disinterested and self-satisfied. He did not manifest symptoms of belonging to any social order. The right teacher appears when the right question is asked.
Reflection Questions
  • What teacher has appeared in response to a real question of mine?
  • Where could clearer questioning summon the teacher I need?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.26

↗
तं द्व‌्यष्टवर्षं सुकुमारपाद- करोरुबाह्वंसकपोलगात्रम् । चार्वायताक्षोन्नसतुल्यकर्ण- सुभ्र्वाननं कम्बुसुजातकण्ठम् ॥ २६ ॥
taṁ dvyaṣṭa-varṣaṁ su-kumāra-pāda-
[tam dvyashta-varsham su-kumaara-paada-]
karoru-bāhv-aṁsa-kapola-gātram
[karoru-baahv-amsa-kapola-gaatram]
cārv-āyatākṣonnasa-tulya-karṇa-
[chaarv-aayataakshonnasa-tulya-karna-]
subhrv-ānanaṁ kambu-sujāta-kaṇṭham
[subhrv-aananam kambu-sujaata-kantham]
tam — him dvi-aṣṭa — sixteen varṣam — years su-kumāra — delicate pāda — legs kara — hands ūru — thighs bāhu — arms aṁsa — shoulders kapola — forehead gātram — body cāru — beautiful āyata — broad akṣa — eyes unnasa — high nose tulya — similar karṇa — ears subhru — nice brows ānanam — face kambu — conchshell sujāta — nicely built kaṇṭham — neck.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ dvyaṣṭa-varṣaṁ su-kumāra-pāda-
tam
him
dvi-aṣṭa
sixteen
varṣam
years
su-kumāra
delicate
pāda
legs
karoru-bāhv-aṁsa-kapola-gātram
kara
hands
ūru
thighs
bāhu
arms
aṁsa
shoulders
kapola
forehead
gātram
body
cārv-āyatākṣonnasa-tulya-karṇa-
cāru
beautiful
āyata
broad
akṣa
eyes
unnasa
high nose
tulya
similar
karṇa
ears
subhrv-ānanaṁ kambu-sujāta-kaṇṭham
subhru
nice brows
ānanam
face
kambu
conchshell
sujāta
nicely built
kaṇṭham
neck.
This son of Vyāsadeva was only sixteen years old. His legs, hands, thighs, arms, shoulders, forehead and the other parts of his body were all delicately formed. His eyes were beautifully wide, and his nose and ears were highly raised. He had a very attractive face, and his neck was well formed and beautiful like a conchshell.

A respectable personality is described beginning with the legs, and this honored system is observed here with Śukadeva Gosvāmī. He was only sixteen years of age. A person is honored for his achievements and not for advanced age. A person can be older by experience and not by age. Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī, who is described herein as the son of Vyāsadeva, was by his knowledge more experienced than all the sages present there, although he was only sixteen years old.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He was sixteen years old, with tender feet, hands, thighs, arms, shoulders, and forehead. His face had beautiful, long eyes, raised nose, symmetrical ears, and shapely eyebrows. His throat was as beautiful as a conch.
Commentary

He was sixteen. His face had beautiful, long eyes and raised nose. His ears were equal, not irregularly long or short. His eyebrows were beautiful. This was the appearance of his face. His throat was beautiful like a conch with three lines.

Vyāsa's son was only sixteen years old. His legs, hands, thighs, arms, shoulders, forehead, and other parts of his body were all delicately formed. Wisdom can come in youthful, delicate form. Don't dismiss the messenger by appearance.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom am I dismissing because of their age or look?
  • Where could a delicate, youthful figure carry the answer I need?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.27

↗
निगूढजत्रुं पृथुतुङ्गवक्षस- मावर्तनाभिं वलिवल्गूदरं च । दिगम्बरं वक्त्रविकीर्णकेशं प्रलम्बबाहुं स्वमरोत्तमाभम् ॥ २७ ॥
nigūḍha-jatruṁ pṛthu-tuṅga-vakṣasam
[nigoodha-jatrum prithu-tunga-vakshasam]
āvarta-nābhiṁ vali-valgūdaraṁ ca
[aavarta-naabhim vali-valgoodaram cha]
dig-ambaraṁ vaktra-vikīrṇa-keśaṁ
[dig-ambaram vaktra-vikeerna-kesham]
pralamba-bāhuṁ svamarottamābham
[pralamba-baahum svamarottamaabham]
nigūḍha — covered jatrum — collarbone pṛthu — broad tuṅga — swollen vakṣasam — chest āvarta — whirled nābhim — navel vali-valgu — striped udaram — abdomen ca — also dik-ambaram — dressed by all directions (naked) vaktra — curled vikīrṇa — scattered keśam — hair pralamba — elongated bāhum — hands su-amara-uttama — the best among the gods (Kṛṣṇa) ābham — hue.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nigūḍha-jatruṁ pṛthu-tuṅga-vakṣasam
nigūḍha
covered
jatrum
collarbone
pṛthu
broad
tuṅga
swollen
vakṣasam
chest
āvarta-nābhiṁ vali-valgūdaraṁ ca
āvarta
whirled
nābhim
navel
vali-valgu
striped
udaram
abdomen
ca
also
dig-ambaraṁ vaktra-vikīrṇa-keśaṁ
dik-ambaram
dressed by all directions (naked)
vaktra
curled
vikīrṇa
scattered
keśam
hair
pralamba-bāhuṁ svamarottamābham
pralamba
elongated
bāhum
hands
su-amara-uttama
the best among the gods (Kṛṣṇa)
ābham
hue.
His collarbone was fleshy, his chest broad and thick, his navel deep and his abdomen beautifully striped. His arms were long, and curly hair was strewn over his beautiful face. He was naked, and the hue of his body reflected that of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

His bodily features indicate him to be different from common men. All the signs described in connection with the bodily features of Śukadeva Gosvāmī are uncommon symptoms, typical of great personalities, according to physiognomical calculations. His bodily hue resembled that of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is the supreme among the gods, demigods and all living beings.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His collar bone was well covered. His chest was broad and high. His navel was like a whirlpool. His abdomen was beautiful, indented with three horizontal lines. The directions were his clothing (. His hair was scattered on his face. His arms reached his knees. His complexion was that of Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

His collar bone (jatrum) was fleshy. His complexion was equal to that of Kṛṣṇa, best among the devas (su amara).

Collarbone fleshy, chest broad, navel deep, abdomen striped beautifully. Arms long, curly hair on his beautiful face. He was naked, hue reflecting Lord Kṛṣṇa's. The teacher resembles the Lord. Look for the lineaments.
Reflection Questions
  • What about my own teacher resembles the One they teach?
  • Where could resemblance signal authenticity?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.28

↗
श्यामं सदापीव्यवयोऽङ्गलक्ष्म्या स्त्रीणां मनोज्ञं रुचिरस्मितेन । प्रत्युत्थितास्ते मुनय: स्वासनेभ्य- स्तल्लक्षणज्ञा अपि गूढवर्चसम् ॥ २८ ॥
śyāmaṁ sadāpīvya-vayo-’ṅga-lakṣmyā
[shyaamam sadaapeevya-vayo-’nga-lakshmyaa]
strīṇāṁ mano-jñaṁ rucira-smitena
[streenaam mano-jnam ruchira-smitena]
pratyutthitās te munayaḥ svāsanebhyas
[pratyutthitaas te munayah svaasanebhyas]
tal-lakṣaṇa-jñā api gūḍha-varcasam
[tal-lakshana-jnaa api goodha-varchasam]
śyāmam — blackish sadā — always apīvya — excessively vayaḥ — age aṅga — symptoms lakṣmyā — by the opulence of strīṇām — of the fair sex manaḥ-jñam — attractive rucira — beautiful smitena — smiling pratyutthitāḥ — stood up te — all of them munayaḥ — the great sages sva — own āsanebhyaḥ — from the seats tat — those lakṣaṇa-jñāḥ — expert in the art of physiognomy api — even gūḍha-varcasam — covered glories.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śyāmaṁ sadāpīvya-vayo-’ṅga-lakṣmyā
śyāmam
blackish
sadā
always
apīvya
excessively
vayaḥ
age
strīṇāṁ mano-jñaṁ rucira-smitena
aṅga
symptoms
pratyutthitās te munayaḥ svāsanebhyas
tal-lakṣaṇa-jñā api gūḍha-varcasam
lakṣmyā
by the opulence of
strīṇām
of the fair sex
manaḥ-jñam
attractive
rucira
beautiful
smitena
smiling
pratyutthitāḥ
stood up
te
all of them
munayaḥ
the great sages
sva
own
āsanebhyaḥ
from the seats
tat
those
lakṣaṇa-jñāḥ
expert in the art of physiognomy
api
even
gūḍha-varcasam
covered glories.
He was blackish and very beautiful due to his youth. Because of the glamor of his body and his attractive smiles, he was pleasing to women. Though he tried to cover his natural glories, the great sages present there were all expert in the art of physiognomy, and so they honored him by rising from their seats.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He was dark in complexion, attractive to women with his pleasant smile, his bodily features and his attractive youthfulness. Though his splendor was covered, the sages, knowing the symptoms of a great person, rose from their seats to welcome him.
Commentary

He was attractive to women because of his natural smile, the beauty of his limbs, and his ideal age, which was fixed (sadā) at new youth (sixteen years). Seeing him, even though his splendor was covered, the sages recognized him.

Blackish and beautiful with youth, attractive smile, pleasing to women. Though he tried to cover his natural glories, sages present were expert in studying symptoms. Greatness shows even when modestly covered.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I overlooking covered greatness?
  • What 'symptoms' would help me recognize the real teacher?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.29

↗
स विष्णुरातोऽतिथय आगताय तस्मै सपर्यां शिरसाजहार । ततो निवृत्ता ह्यबुधा: स्त्रियोऽर्भका महासने सोपविवेश पूजित: ॥ २९ ॥
sa viṣṇu-rāto ’tithaya āgatāya
[sa vishnu-raato ’tithaya aagataaya]
tasmai saparyāṁ śirasājahāra
[tasmai saparyaam shirasaajahaara]
tato nivṛttā hy abudhāḥ striyo ’rbhakā
[tato nivrittaa hy abudhaah striyo ’rbhakaa]
mahāsane sopaviveśa pūjitaḥ
[mahaasane sopavivesha poojitah]
saḥ — he viṣṇu-rātaḥ — Mahārāja Parīkṣit (who is always protected by Lord Viṣṇu) atithaye — to become a guest āgatāya — one who arrived there tasmai — unto him saparyām — with the whole body śirasā — with bowed head ājahāra — offered obeisances tataḥ — thereafter nivṛttāḥ — ceased hi — certainly abudhāḥ — less intelligent striyaḥ — women arbhakāḥ — boys mahā-āsane — exalted seat sa — he upaviveśa — sat down pūjitaḥ — being respected.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa viṣṇu-rāto ’tithaya āgatāya
saḥ
he
viṣṇu-rātaḥ
Mahārāja Parīkṣit (who is always protected by Lord Viṣṇu)
atithaye
to become a guest
āgatāya
one who arrived there
tasmai saparyāṁ śirasājahāra
tasmai
unto him
saparyām
with the whole body
śirasā
with bowed head
ājahāra
offered obeisances
tato nivṛttā hy abudhāḥ striyo ’rbhakā
tataḥ
thereafter
nivṛttāḥ
ceased
hi
certainly
abudhāḥ
less intelligent
striyaḥ
women
arbhakāḥ
boys
mahāsane sopaviveśa pūjitaḥ
mahā-āsane
exalted seat
sa
he
upaviveśa
sat down
pūjitaḥ
being respected.
Mahārāja Parīkṣit, who is also known as Viṣṇurāta [one who is always protected by Viṣṇu], bowed his head to receive the chief guest, Śukadeva Gosvāmī. At that time all the ignorant women and boys ceased following Śrīla Śukadeva. Receiving respect from all, Śukadeva Gosvāmī took his exalted seat.

On Śukadeva Gosvāmī’s arrival at the meeting, everyone, except Śrīla Vyāsadeva, Nārada and a few others, stood up, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit, who was glad to receive a great devotee of the Lord, bowed down before him with all the limbs of his body. Śukadeva Gosvāmī also exchanged the greetings and reception by embrace, shaking of hands, nodding and bowing down, especially before his father and Nārada Muni. Thus he was offered the presidential seat at the meeting. When he was so received by the king and sages, the street boys and less intelligent women who followed him were struck with wonder and fear. So they retired from their frivolous activities, and everything was full of gravity and calm.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When his guest arrived, Parīkṣit worshipped him with bowed head. The ignorant women and children disappeared. In the worship, Śukadeva sat on a huge seat.
Commentary

Parīkṣit (viṣṇurātaḥ) worshipped him while bowing with his head. The women and children then disappeared. Śukadeva sat on a huge throne which was offered as part of the worship. The sandhi in sopaviveśa is poetic license.

Parīkṣit bowed his head to receive Śukadeva. Ignorant women and boys ceased following him. Receiving respect, Śukadeva was offered a chief seat. Honor recalibrates the room. Naming a guest reorders the company.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could I publicly honor someone in a way that recalibrates the room?
  • What seat could I offer that signals the right hierarchy?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.30

↗
स संवृतस्तत्र महान् महीयसां ब्रह्मर्षिराजर्षिदेवर्षिसङ्घै: । व्यरोचतालं भगवान् यथेन्दु- र्ग्रहर्क्षतारानिकरै: परीत: ॥ ३० ॥
sa saṁvṛtas tatra mahān mahīyasāṁ
[sa samvritas tatra mahaan maheeyasaam]
brahmarṣi-rājarṣi-devarṣi-saṅghaiḥ
[brahmarshi-raajarshi-devarshi-sanghaih]
vyarocatālaṁ bhagavān yathendur
[vyarochataalam bhagavaan yathendur]
graharkṣa-tārā-nikaraiḥ parītaḥ
[graharksha-taaraa-nikaraih pareetah]
saḥ — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī saṁvṛtaḥ — surrounded by tatra — there mahān — great mahīyasām — of the greatest brahmarṣi — saint among the brāhmaṇas rājarṣi — saint among the kings devarṣi — saint among the demigods saṅghaiḥ — by the assembly of vyarocata — well deserved alam — able bhagavān — powerful yathā — as induḥ — the moon graha — planets ṛkṣa — heavenly bodies tārā — stars nikaraiḥ — by the assembly of parītaḥ — surrounded by.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa saṁvṛtas tatra mahān mahīyasāṁ
saḥ
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī
saṁvṛtaḥ
surrounded by
tatra
there
mahān
great
mahīyasām
of the greatest
brahmarṣi-rājarṣi-devarṣi-saṅghaiḥ
brahmarṣi
saint among the brāhmaṇas
rājarṣi
saint among the kings
devarṣi
saint among the demigods
saṅghaiḥ
by the assembly of
vyarocatālaṁ bhagavān yathendur
vyarocata
well deserved
alam
able
bhagavān
powerful
yathā
as
induḥ
the moon
graharkṣa-tārā-nikaraiḥ parītaḥ
graha
planets
ṛkṣa
heavenly bodies
tārā
stars
nikaraiḥ
by the assembly of
parītaḥ
surrounded by.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī was then surrounded by saintly sages and demigods just as the moon is surrounded by stars, planets and other heavenly bodies. His presence was gorgeous, and he was respected by all.

In the great assembly of saintly personalities, there was Vyāsadeva the brahmarṣi, Nārada the devarṣi, Paraśurāma the great ruler of the kṣatriya kings, etc. Some of them were powerful incarnations of the Lord. Śukadeva Gosvāmī was not known as brahmarṣi, rājarṣi or devarṣi, nor was he an incarnation like Nārada, Vyāsa or Paraśurāma. And yet he excelled them in respects paid. This means that the devotee of the Lord is more honored in the world than the Lord Himself. One should therefore never minimize the importance of a devotee like Śukadeva Gosvāmī.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The greatest among the great, Śukadeva, seated there, surrounded by the crowd of sages among brāhmaṇas, sages among kings and sages among devatās shone like the moon surrounded by groups of planets, constellations, and stars.
Commentary

There, sitting on the throne, Śukadeva, greatest among the great, surrounded by the sages, shone like the moon surrounded by the planets and stars. The planets are Venus and others. The constellations are Aśvini and others. The stars are all other luminaries in the sky. Brahmarṣis are headed by Vaśiṣṭha. Rājarṣis are headed by Ārṣṭiṣeṇa. Devaṛsis are headed by Nārada.

Śukadeva was surrounded by saintly sages and demigods like the moon by stars. His presence was gorgeous, respected by all. Real holiness produces natural orbit. We can recognize the moon.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom do I orbit, knowingly or unknowingly?
  • Where could I be more deliberate about my central figures?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.31

↗
प्रशान्तमासीनमकुण्ठमेधसं मुनिं नृपो भागवतोऽभ्युपेत्य । प्रणम्य मूर्ध्नावहित: कृताञ्जलि- र्नत्वा गिरा सूनृतयान्वपृच्छत् ॥ ३१ ॥
praśāntam āsīnam akuṇṭha-medhasaṁ
[prashaantam aaseenam akuntha-medhasam]
muniṁ nṛpo bhāgavato ’bhyupetya
[munim nripo bhaagavato ’bhyupetya]
praṇamya mūrdhnāvahitaḥ kṛtāñjalir
[pranamya moordhnaavahitah kritaanjalir]
natvā girā sūnṛtayānvapṛcchat
[natvaa giraa soonritayaanvaprichchat]
praśāntam — perfectly pacified āsīnam — sitting akuṇṭha — without hesitation medhasam — one who has sufficient intelligence munim — unto the great sage nṛpaḥ — the King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit) bhāgavataḥ — the great devotee abhyupetya — approaching him praṇamya — bowing down mūrdhnā — his head avahitaḥ — properly kṛta-añjaliḥ — with folded hands natvā — politely girā — by words sūnṛtayā — in sweet voices anvapṛcchat — inquired.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
praśāntam āsīnam akuṇṭha-medhasaṁ
praśāntam
perfectly pacified
āsīnam
sitting
akuṇṭha
without hesitation
medhasam
one who has sufficient intelligence
muniṁ nṛpo bhāgavato ’bhyupetya
munim
unto the great sage
nṛpaḥ
the King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit)
bhāgavataḥ
the great devotee
abhyupetya
approaching him
praṇamya mūrdhnāvahitaḥ kṛtāñjalir
praṇamya
bowing down
mūrdhnā
his head
avahitaḥ
properly
kṛta-añjaliḥ
with folded hands
natvā girā sūnṛtayānvapṛcchat
natvā
politely
girā
by words
sūnṛtayā
in sweet voices
anvapṛcchat
inquired.
The sage Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī sat perfectly pacified, intelligent and ready to answer any question without hesitation. The great devotee, Mahārāja Parīkṣit, approached him, offered his respects by bowing before him, and politely inquired with sweet words and folded hands.

The gesture now adopted by Mahārāja Parīkṣit of questioning a master is quite befitting in terms of scriptural injunctions. The scriptural injunction is that one should humbly approach a spiritual master to understand the transcendental science. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was now prepared for meeting his death, and within the very short time of seven days he was to know the process of entering the kingdom of God. In such important cases, one is required to approach a spiritual master. There is no necessity of approaching a spiritual master unless one is in need of solving the problems of life. One who does not know how to put questions before the spiritual master has no business seeing him. And the qualification of the spiritual master is perfectly manifested in the person of Śukadeva Gosvāmī. Both the spiritual master and the disciple, namely Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit, attained perfection through the medium of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śukadeva Gosvāmī learned Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam from his father, Vyāsadeva, but he had no chance to recite it. Before Mahārāja Parīkṣit he recited Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and answered the questions of Mahārāja Parīkṣit unhesitatingly, and thus both the master and the disciple got salvation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devotee King, approaching the sage peacefully sitting with unlimited knowledge, offered his respects with his head, folded his hands, again offered respects and then inquired with sweet words.
Commentary

To ask a question he again offered respects. With sweet (sūnṛtayā) words he asked Śukadeva who had unlimited intelligence in all subjects (akuṇṭha-medhasam).

Śukadeva sat perfectly pacified, intelligent, ready to answer any question without hesitation. Parīkṣit approached, offered respects by bowing, and politely inquired. Quiet readiness invites real questions.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I 'ready to answer without hesitation' in my area of teaching?
  • Where could quiet readiness improve my service?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.32

↗
परीक्षिदुवाच अहो अद्य वयं ब्रह्मन् सत्सेव्या: क्षत्रबन्धव: । कृपयातिथिरूपेण भवद्भ‍िस्तीर्थका: कृता: ॥ ३२ ॥
parīkṣid uvāca
[pareekshid uvaacha]
aho adya vayaṁ brahman
[aho adya vayam brahman]
sat-sevyāḥ kṣatra-bandhavaḥ
[sat-sevyaah kshatra-bandhavah]
kṛpayātithi-rūpeṇa
[kripayaatithi-roopena]
bhavadbhis tīrthakāḥ kṛtāḥ
[bhavadbhis teerthakaah kritaah]
parīkṣit uvāca — the fortunate Mahārāja Parīkṣit said aho — ah adya — today vayam — we brahman — O brāhmaṇa sat-sevyāḥ — eligible to serve the devotee kṣatra — the ruling class bandhavaḥ — friends kṛpayā — by your mercy atithi-rūpeṇa — in the manner of a guest bhavadbhiḥ — by your good self tīrthakāḥ — qualified for being places of pilgrimage kṛtāḥ — done by you.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
parīkṣid uvāca
parīkṣit uvāca
the fortunate Mahārāja Parīkṣit said
aho adya vayaṁ brahman
aho
ah
adya
today
vayam
we
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
sat-sevyāḥ kṣatra-bandhavaḥ
sat-sevyāḥ
eligible to serve the devotee
kṣatra
the ruling class
bandhavaḥ
friends
kṛpayātithi-rūpeṇa
kṛpayā
by your mercy
atithi-rūpeṇa
in the manner of a guest
bhavadbhis tīrthakāḥ kṛtāḥ
bhavadbhiḥ
by your good self
tīrthakāḥ
qualified for being places of pilgrimage
kṛtāḥ
done by you.
The fortunate King Parīkṣit said: O brāhmaṇa, by your mercy only, you have sanctified us, making us like unto places of pilgrimage, all by your presence here as my guest. By your mercy, we, who are but unworthy royalty, become eligible to serve the devotee.

Saintly devotees like Śukadeva Gosvāmī generally do not approach worldly enjoyers, especially those in royal orders. Mahārāja Pratāparudra was a follower of Lord Caitanya, but when he wanted to see the Lord, the Lord refused to see him because he was a king. For a devotee who desires to go back to Godhead, two things are strictly prohibited: worldly enjoyers and women. Therefore, devotees of the standard of Śukadeva Gosvāmī are never interested in seeing kings. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was, of course, a different case. He was a great devotee, although a king, and therefore Śukadeva Gosvāmī came to see him in his last stage of life. Mahārāja Parīkṣit, out of his devotional humility, felt himself an unworthy descendant of his great kṣatriya forefathers, although he was as great as his predecessors. The unworthy sons of the royal orders are called kṣatra-bandhavas, as the unworthy sons of the brāhmaṇas are called dvija-bandhus or brahma-bandhus. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was greatly encouraged by the presence of Śukadeva Gosvāmī. He felt himself sanctified by the presence of the great saint whose presence turns any place into a place of pilgrimage.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Parīkṣit said: O brāhmaṇa! Today we low kṣatriyas have become respected by the saints because we have been purified by your coming as a guest out of your mercy. Simply from remembering you, men’s houses even become immediately purified. What to speak of seeing, touching, washing your feet and giving you a seat!
Commentary

Parīkṣit speaks in eight verses. O brāhmaṇa! We low kṣatriyas have become respected by the saints because we have been purified (tīrthakāḥ kṛtāḥ) by your coming as a guest. By remembering you, or by being remembered by you, our houses become purified, what to speak of the bodies of our wives and sons.

Parīkṣit said: O brāhmaṇa, by your mercy you have sanctified us, making us like places of pilgrimage by your presence as my guest. We unworthy royalty become eligible to serve. Presence as sanctification.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose presence has sanctified my space recently?
  • Where could I receive such presence with the gratitude due?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.33

↗
येषां संस्मरणात्पुंसां सद्य: शुद्ध्यन्ति वै गृहा: । किं पुनर्दर्शनस्पर्शपादशौचासनादिभि: ॥ ३३ ॥
yeṣāṁ saṁsmaraṇāt puṁsāṁ
[yeshaam samsmaranaat pumsaam]
sadyaḥ śuddhyanti vai gṛhāḥ
[sadyah shuddhyanti vai grihaah]
kiṁ punar darśana-sparśa-
[kim punar darshana-sparsha-]
pāda-śaucāsanādibhiḥ
[paada-shauchaasanaadibhih]
yeṣām — of whom saṁsmaraṇāt — by remembrance puṁsām — of a person sadyaḥ — instantly śuddhyanti — cleanses vai — certainly gṛhāḥ — all houses kim — what punaḥ — then darśana — meeting sparśa — touching pāda — the feet śauca — washing āsana-ādibhiḥ — by offering a seat, etc.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yeṣāṁ saṁsmaraṇāt puṁsāṁ
yeṣām
of whom
saṁsmaraṇāt
by remembrance
puṁsām
of a person
sadyaḥ śuddhyanti vai gṛhāḥ
sadyaḥ
instantly
śuddhyanti
cleanses
vai
certainly
gṛhāḥ
all houses
kiṁ punar darśana-sparśa-
kim
what
punaḥ
then
darśana
meeting
sparśa
touching
pāda-śaucāsanādibhiḥ
pāda
the feet
śauca
washing
āsana-ādibhiḥ
by offering a seat, etc.
Simply by our remembering you, our houses become instantly sanctified. And what to speak of seeing you, touching you, washing your holy feet and offering you a seat in our home?

The importance of holy places of pilgrimage is due to the presence of great sages and saints. It is said that sinful persons go to the holy places and leave their sins there to accumulate. But the presence of the great saints disinfects the accumulated sins, and thus the holy places continue to remain sanctified by the grace of the devotees and saints present there. If such saints appear in the homes of worldly people, certainly the accumulated sins of such worldly enjoyers become neutralized. Therefore, the holy saints actually have no self-interest with the householders. The only aim of such saints is to sanctify the houses of the householders, and the householders therefore should feel grateful when such saints and sages appear at their doors. A householder who dishonors such holy orders is a great offender. It is enjoined, therefore, that a householder who does not bow down before a saint at once must undergo fasting for the day in order to neutralize the great offense.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Parīkṣit said: O brāhmaṇa! Today we low kṣatriyas have become respected by the saints because we have been purified by your coming as a guest out of your mercy. Simply from remembering you, men’s houses even become immediately purified. What to speak of seeing, touching, washing your feet and giving you a seat!
Commentary

Parīkṣit speaks in eight verses. O brāhmaṇa! We low kṣatriyas have become respected by the saints because we have been purified (tīrthakāḥ kṛtāḥ) by your coming as a guest. By remembering you, or by being remembered by you, our houses become purified, what to speak of the bodies of our wives and sons.

Simply by remembering you, our houses become sanctified. What to speak of seeing, touching, washing your holy feet, and offering you a seat. Memory itself sanctifies. We don't need direct contact to be transformed.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose remembered presence still sanctifies my house?
  • Where could remembrance be enough?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.34

↗
सान्निध्यात्ते महायोगिन्पातकानि महान्त्यपि । सद्यो नश्यन्ति वै पुंसां विष्णोरिव सुरेतरा: ॥ ३४ ॥
sānnidhyāt te mahā-yogin
[saannidhyaat te mahaa-yogin]
pātakāni mahānty api
[paatakaani mahaanty api]
sadyo naśyanti vai puṁsāṁ
[sadyo nashyanti vai pumsaam]
viṣṇor iva suretarāḥ
[vishnor iva suretaraah]
sānnidhyāt — on account of the presence te — your mahā-yogin — O great mystic pātakāni — sins mahānti — invulnerable api — in spite of sadyaḥ — immediately naśyanti — vanquished vai — certainly puṁsām — of a person viṣṇoḥ — like the presence of the Personality of Godhead iva — like sura-itarāḥ — other than the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sānnidhyāt te mahā-yogin
sānnidhyāt
on account of the presence
te
your
mahā-yogin
O great mystic
pātakāni mahānty api
pātakāni
sins
mahānti
invulnerable
api
in spite of
sadyo naśyanti vai puṁsāṁ
sadyaḥ
immediately
naśyanti
vanquished
vai
certainly
puṁsām
of a person
viṣṇor iva suretarāḥ
viṣṇoḥ
like the presence of the Personality of Godhead
iva
like
sura-itarāḥ
other than the demigods.
Just as the atheist cannot remain in the presence of the Personality of Godhead, so also the invulnerable sins of a man are immediately vanquished in your presence, O saint! O great mystic!

There are two classes of human beings, namely the atheist and the devotee of the Lord. The devotee of the Lord, because of manifesting godly qualities, is called a demigod, whereas the atheist is called a demon. The demon cannot stand the presence of Viṣṇu, the Personality of Godhead. The demons are always busy in trying to vanquish the Personality of Godhead, but factually as soon as the Personality of Godhead appears, by either His transcendental name, form, attributes, pastimes, paraphernalia or variegatedness, the demon is at once vanquished. It is said that a ghost cannot remain as soon as the holy name of the Lord is chanted. The great saints and devotees of the Lord are in the list of His paraphernalia, and thus as soon as a saintly devotee is present, the ghostly sins are at once vanquished. That is the verdict of all Vedic literatures. One is recommended, therefore, to associate only with saintly devotees so that worldly demons and ghosts cannot exert their sinister influence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O great yogī! The greatest sins are destroyed immediately by closeness to you, just as the demons are destroyed by closeness to the Lord.
As the atheist cannot remain in the presence of the Personality of Godhead, so the invulnerable sins of a man are immediately vanquished in your presence. Holy company is direct medicine.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'invulnerable sin' of mine might dissolve in the right company?
  • Where am I avoiding the company that would heal me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.35

↗
अपि मे भगवान् प्रीत: कृष्ण: पाण्डुसुतप्रिय: । पैतृष्वसेयप्रीत्यर्थं तद्गोत्रस्यात्तबान्धव: ॥ ३५ ॥
api me bhagavān prītaḥ
[api me bhagavaan preetah]
kṛṣṇaḥ pāṇḍu-suta-priyaḥ
[krishnah paandu-suta-priyah]
paitṛ-ṣvaseya-prīty-arthaṁ
[paitri-shvaseya-preety-artham]
tad-gotrasyātta-bāndhavaḥ
[tad-gotrasyaatta-baandhavah]
api — definitely me — unto me bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead prītaḥ — pleased kṛṣṇaḥ — the Lord pāṇḍu-suta — the sons of King Pāṇḍu priyaḥ — dear paitṛ — in relation with the father svaseya — the sons of the sister prīti — satisfaction artham — in the matter of tat — their gotrasya — of the descendant ātta — accepted bāndhavaḥ — as a friend.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
api me bhagavān prītaḥ
api
definitely
me
unto me
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
prītaḥ
pleased
kṛṣṇaḥ pāṇḍu-suta-priyaḥ
kṛṣṇaḥ
the Lord
pāṇḍu-suta
the sons of King Pāṇḍu
priyaḥ
dear
paitṛ-ṣvaseya-prīty-arthaṁ
paitṛ
in relation with the father
svaseya
the sons of the sister
prīti
satisfaction
artham
in the matter of
tad-gotrasyātta-bāndhavaḥ
tat
their
gotrasya
of the descendant
ātta
accepted
bāndhavaḥ
as a friend.
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, who is very dear to the sons of King Pāṇḍu, has accepted me as one of those relatives just to please His great cousins and brothers.

A pure and exclusive devotee of the Lord serves his family interest more dexterously than others, who are attached to illusory family affairs. Generally people are attached to family matters, and the whole economic impetus of human society is moving under the influence of family affection. Such deluded persons have no information that one can render better service to the family by becoming a devotee of the Lord. The Lord gives special protection to the family members and descendants of a devotee, even though such members are themselves nondevotees! Mahārāja Prahlāda was a great devotee of the Lord, but his father, Hiraṇyakaśipu, was a great atheist and declared enemy of the Lord. But despite all this, Hiraṇyakaśipu was awarded salvation due to his being the father of Mahārāja Prahlāda. The Lord is so kind that he gives all protection to the family members of His devotee, and thus the devotee has no need to bother about his family members, even if one leaves such family members aside to discharge devotional service. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers were the sons of Kuntī, the paternal aunt of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit admits the patronage of Lord Kṛṣṇa because of his being the only grandson of the great Pāṇḍavas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of affection for his cousins the Pāṇḍavas, Lord Kṛṣṇa, dear to the Pāṇḍavas, has shown friendship with me, their descendent, by sending you.
Commentary

Paternal cousins of Kṛṣṇa were the Pāṇḍavas. Kṛṣṇa has made friendship with me belonging to that family. You have been sent by him to deliver me.

Kṛṣṇa, very dear to the Pāṇḍus, has accepted me as one of His relatives, just to please His great cousins and brothers. Sometimes we receive favor because the Lord wants to please those who love us.
Reflection Questions
  • What favor in my life might be the Lord pleasing those who love me?
  • Where could I receive grace as multi-personal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.36

↗
अन्यथा तेऽव्यक्तगतेर्दर्शनं न: कथं नृणाम् । नितरां म्रियमाणानां संसिद्धस्य वनीयस: ॥ ३६ ॥
anyathā te ’vyakta-gater
[anyathaa te ’vyakta-gater]
darśanaṁ naḥ kathaṁ nṛṇām
[darshanam nah katham nrinaam]
nitarāṁ mriyamāṇānāṁ
[nitaraam mriyamaanaanaam]
saṁsiddhasya vanīyasaḥ
[samsiddhasya vaneeyasah]
anyathā — otherwise te — your avyakta-gateḥ — of one whose movements are invisible darśanam — meeting naḥ — for us katham — how nṛṇām — of the people nitarām — specifically mriyamāṇānām — of those who are about to die saṁsiddhasya — of one who is all-perfect vanīyasaḥ — voluntary appearance.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anyathā te ’vyakta-gater
anyathā
otherwise
te
your
darśanaṁ naḥ kathaṁ nṛṇām
nitarāṁ mriyamāṇānāṁ
saṁsiddhasya vanīyasaḥ
avyakta-gateḥ
of one whose movements are invisible
darśanam
meeting
naḥ
for us
katham
how
nṛṇām
of the people
nitarām
specifically
mriyamāṇānām
of those who are about to die
saṁsiddhasya
of one who is all-perfect
vanīyasaḥ
voluntary appearance.
Otherwise [without being inspired by Lord Kṛṣṇa] how is it that you have voluntarily appeared here, though you are moving incognito to the common man and are not visible to us who are on the verge of death?

The great sage Śukadeva Gosvāmī was certainly inspired by Lord Kṛṣṇa to appear voluntarily before Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the great devotee of the Lord, just to give him the teachings of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. One can achieve the nucleus of the devotional service of the Lord by the mercy of the spiritual master and the Personality of Godhead. The spiritual master is the manifested representative of the Lord to help one achieve ultimate success. One who is not authorized by the Lord cannot become a spiritual master. Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī is an authorized spiritual master, and thus he was inspired by the Lord to appear before Mahārāja Parīkṣit and instruct him in the teachings of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. One can achieve the ultimate success of going back to Godhead if he is favored by the Lord’s sending His true representative. As soon as a true representative of the Lord is met by a devotee of the Lord, the devotee is assured a guarantee for going back to Godhead just after leaving the present body. This, however, depends on the sincerity of the devotee himself. The Lord is seated in the heart of all living beings, and thus he knows very well the movements of all individual persons. As soon as the Lord finds that a particular soul is very eager to go back to Godhead, the Lord at once sends His bona fide representative. The sincere devotee is thus assured by the Lord of going back to Godhead. The conclusion is that to get the assistance and help of a bona fide spiritual master means to receive the direct help of the Lord Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Otherwise how is it possible that men like us at the moment of death can see a perfected being like you, whose movements are unknown, and is most munificent?
Commentary

Vanayitā is one who is requested (and grants) benedictions. Superlative is vanayitṛtamaḥ. This becomes vanīyas by the rule tu iṣṭhemeyaḥsu: the affix tṛ is elided before the affixes iṣṭan, imanic and īyāsun (īyās) (Pāṇini 6.4.154) Vanīyasaḥ means “of the most generous.” Because he is so generous he will say, “Please ask me.”

Otherwise how is it that you have voluntarily appeared here, though you are moving incognito and not visible to us who are on the verge of death? Some appearances are inexplicable except by intervention.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose appearance in my life feels inexplicable except by divine arrangement?
  • Where could I name that as such?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.37

↗
अत: पृच्छामि संसिद्धिं योगिनां परमं गुरुम् । पुरुषस्येह यत्कार्यं म्रियमाणस्य सर्वथा ॥ ३७ ॥
ataḥ pṛcchāmi saṁsiddhiṁ
[atah prichchaami samsiddhim]
yogināṁ paramaṁ gurum
[yoginaam paramam gurum]
puruṣasyeha yat kāryaṁ
[purushasyeha yat kaaryam]
mriyamāṇasya sarvathā
[mriyamaanasya sarvathaa]
ataḥ — therefore pṛcchāmi — beg to inquire saṁsiddhim — the way of perfection yoginām — of the saints paramam — the supreme gurum — the spiritual master puruṣasya — of a person iha — in this life yat — whatever kāryam — duty mriyamāṇasya — of one who is going to die sarvathā — in every way.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ataḥ pṛcchāmi saṁsiddhiṁ
ataḥ
therefore
pṛcchāmi
beg to inquire
saṁsiddhim
the way of perfection
yogināṁ paramaṁ gurum
yoginām
of the saints
paramam
the supreme
gurum
the spiritual master
puruṣasyeha yat kāryaṁ
puruṣasya
of a person
iha
in this life
yat
whatever
kāryam
duty
mriyamāṇasya sarvathā
mriyamāṇasya
of one who is going to die
sarvathā
in every way.
You are the spiritual master of great saints and devotees. I am therefore begging you to show the way of perfection for all persons, and especially for one who is about to die.

Unless one is perfectly anxious to inquire about the way of perfection, there is no necessity of approaching a spiritual master. A spiritual master is not a kind of decoration for a householder. Generally a fashionable materialist engages a so-called spiritual master without any profit. The pseudo spiritual master flatters the so-called disciple, and thereby both the master and his ward go to hell without a doubt. Mahārāja Parīkṣit is the right type of disciple because he puts forward questions vital to the interest of all men, particularly for the dying men. The question put forward by Mahārāja Parīkṣit is the basic principle of the complete thesis of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Now let us see how intelligently the great master replies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I ask the supreme guru of the yogīs “What is complete perfection and what is to be done at all times for attaining that perfection for a man about to die?”.
Commentary

I ask about the complete perfection (saṁṣiddhim) and I ask the sādhana to be performed at all times for that perfection.

You are the spiritual master of great saints and devotees. I am therefore begging you to show the way of perfection for all persons, especially one about to die. Ask the master what only the master can show.
Reflection Questions
  • What only-this-master question have I been holding back?
  • Where could I beg more openly for the way?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.38

↗
यच्छ्रोतव्यमथो जप्यं यत्कर्तव्यं नृभि: प्रभो । स्मर्तव्यं भजनीयं वा ब्रूहि यद्वा विपर्ययम् ॥ ३८ ॥
yac chrotavyam atho japyaṁ
[yach chrotavyam atho japyam]
yat kartavyaṁ nṛbhiḥ prabho
[yat kartavyam nribhih prabho]
smartavyaṁ bhajanīyaṁ vā
[smartavyam bhajaneeyam vaa]
brūhi yad vā viparyayam
[broohi yad vaa viparyayam]
yat — whatever śrotavyam — worth hearing atho — thereof japyam — chanted yat — what also kartavyam — executed nṛbhiḥ — by the people in general prabho — O master smartavyam — that which is remembered bhajanīyam — worshipable vā — either brūhi — please explain yad vā — what it may be viparyayam — against the principle.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yac chrotavyam atho japyaṁ
yat
whatever
śrotavyam
worth hearing
atho
thereof
japyam
chanted
yat kartavyaṁ nṛbhiḥ prabho
yat
what also
kartavyam
executed
nṛbhiḥ
by the people in general
prabho
O master
smartavyaṁ bhajanīyaṁ vā
smartavyam
that which is remembered
bhajanīyam
worshipable
vā
either
brūhi yad vā viparyayam
brūhi
please explain
yad vā
what it may be
viparyayam
against the principle.
Please let me know what a man should hear, chant, remember and worship, and also what he should not do. Please explain all this to me.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O master! Please tell me what men must hear, chant, remember and worship, or what they should not hear, chant, remember or worship.
Commentary

Here he is more specific. Kartavyam should follow each of the four items. Tell me what men must hear among things worthy hearing, what they must chant among things worthy chanting, what they must remember among things worthy remembering, and what they must worship among things worth worshipping. Viparyayam means tell me what must not be heard, chanted, remembered or worshipped.

Please tell me what a man should hear, chant, remember and worship — and what he should not do. Explain all this. The full curriculum requested. The dying ask the most complete questions.
Reflection Questions
  • What is on my own 'hear, chant, remember, worship, avoid' list?
  • Where could I make my curriculum more complete?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.39

↗
नूनं भगवतो ब्रह्मन् गृहेषु गृहमेधिनाम् । न लक्ष्यते ह्यवस्थानमपि गोदोहनं क्‍वचित् ॥ ३९ ॥
nūnaṁ bhagavato brahman
[noonam bhagavato brahman]
gṛheṣu gṛha-medhinām
[griheshu griha-medhinaam]
na lakṣyate hy avasthānam
[na lakshyate hy avasthaanam]
api go-dohanaṁ kvacit
[api go-dohanam kvachit]
nūnam — because bhagavataḥ — of you, who are powerful brahman — O brāhmaṇa gṛheṣu — in the houses gṛha-medhinām — of the householders na — not lakṣyate — are seen hi — exactly avasthānam — staying in api — even go-dohanam — milking the cow kvacit — rarely.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nūnaṁ bhagavato brahman
nūnam
because
bhagavataḥ
of you, who are powerful
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
gṛheṣu gṛha-medhinām
gṛheṣu
in the houses
gṛha-medhinām
of the householders
na
not
na lakṣyate hy avasthānam
lakṣyate
are seen
hi
exactly
avasthānam
staying in
api go-dohanaṁ kvacit
api
even
go-dohanam
milking the cow
kvacit
rarely.
O powerful brāhmaṇa, it is said that you hardly stay in the houses of men long enough to milk a cow.

Saints and sages in the renounced order of life go to the houses of the householders at the time they milk the cows, early in the morning, and ask some quantity of milk for subsistence. A pound of milk fresh from the milk bag of a cow is sufficient to feed an adult with all vitamin values, and therefore saints and sages live only on milk. Even the poorest of the householders keep at least ten cows, each delivering twelve to twenty quarts of milk, and therefore no one hesitates to spare a few pounds of milk for the mendicants. It is the duty of householders to maintain the saints and sages, like the children. So a saint like Śukadeva Gosvāmī would hardly stay at the house of a householder for more than five minutes in the morning. In other words, such saints are very rarely seen in the houses of householders, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit therefore prayed to him to instruct him as soon as possible. The householders also should be intelligent enough to get some transcendental information from visiting sages. The householder should not foolishly ask a saint to deliver what is available in the market. That should be the reciprocal relation between the saints and the householders.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇa! You do not stay in the houses of attached householders even for the time it takes to milk a cow.
Commentary

Since it will be very rare to see you again, you should tell me everything now. You stay not even for the time it takes to milk a cow (go-dohanam).

It is said you hardly stay in the houses of men long enough to milk a cow. The fleeting visit of the great teacher means we use the time well. Don't waste the rare meeting.
Reflection Questions
  • When did I last meet someone briefly and use the time well?
  • Where am I wasting brief windows because I assume more time?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.40

↗
सूत उवाच एवमाभाषित: पृष्ट: स राज्ञा श्लक्ष्णया गिरा । प्रत्यभाषत धर्मज्ञो भगवान् बादरायणि: ॥ ४० ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
evam ābhāṣitaḥ pṛṣṭaḥ
[evam aabhaashitah prishtah]
sa rājñā ślakṣṇayā girā
[sa raajnaa shlakshnayaa giraa]
pratyabhāṣata dharma-jño
[pratyabhaashata dharma-jno]
bhagavān bādarāyaṇiḥ
[bhagavaan baadaraayanih]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said evam — thus ābhāṣitaḥ — being spoken pṛṣṭaḥ — and asked for saḥ — he rājñā — by the King ślakṣṇayā — by sweet girā — language pratyabhāṣata — began to reply dharma-jñaḥ — one who knows the principles of religion bhagavān — the powerful personality bādarāyaṇiḥ — son of Vyāsadeva.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said
evam ābhāṣitaḥ pṛṣṭaḥ
evam
thus
ābhāṣitaḥ
being spoken
pṛṣṭaḥ
and asked for
sa rājñā ślakṣṇayā girā
saḥ
he
rājñā
by the King
ślakṣṇayā
by sweet
girā
language
pratyabhāṣata dharma-jño
pratyabhāṣata
began to reply
dharma-jñaḥ
one who knows the principles of religion
bhagavān bādarāyaṇiḥ
bhagavān
the powerful personality
bādarāyaṇiḥ
son of Vyāsadeva.
Śrī Sūta Gosvāmī said: The King thus spoke and questioned the sage, using sweet language. Then the great and powerful personality, the son of Vyāsadeva, who knew the principles of religion, began his reply.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Nineteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Appearance of Śukadeva Gosvāmī.”

END OF THE FIRST CANTO

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Being addressed and questioned by the King with sweet words, the great son of Vyāsa, knower of dharma, began to answer.
Commentary

Ślakṣṇayā giṛā means “by sweet words.” Canto 2

Chapter One Description of the Universal Form

Second Canto The Cosmic Manifestation Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam Canto 2: "The Cosmic Manifestation" 1. The First Step in God Realization • Translations 1-39 2. The Lord in the Heart • Translations 1-37 3. Pure Devotional Service: The Change in Heart • Translations 1-25 4. The Process of Creation • Translations 1-25 5. The Cause of All Causes • Translations 1-42 6. Puruṣa-sūkta Confirmed • Translations 1-42 7. Scheduled Incarnations with Specific Functions • Translations 1-53 8. Questions by King Parīkṣit • Translations 1-29 9. Answers by Citing the Lord's Version • Translations 1-46 10. Bhāgavatam Is the Answer to All Questions • Translations 1-51 2.1: The First Step in God Realization 1. The First Step in God Realization 2.1.invo #dvn p NaMaae >aGavTae vaSaudevaYa )) oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya oṁ—O my Lord; namaḥ—my respectful obeisances unto You; bhagavate—unto the Personality of Godhead; vāsudevāya—unto Lord Kṛṣṇa, the son of Vasudeva. O my Lord, the all-pervading Personality of Godhead, I offer my respectful obeisances unto You.

The King thus spoke and questioned the sage in sweet language. Then the great and powerful son of Vyāsa, who knew the principles of religion, began his reply. Reply meets question of equal sweetness.
Reflection Questions
  • How could the sweetness of my question shape the sweetness of the answer?
  • Where could I refine my asking?
📝 My note