FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

11.21 · Lord Kṛṣṇa's Explanation of the Vedic Path

39 verses · 🖨 Class prep
U Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (25423 chars)

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) In response to Uddhava’s heartfelt request, Krishna advised him to embrace renunciation and prepare to leave this world. Seeking guidance on how best to do this, Krishna began His explanations on a variety of topics, focusing in on the glory of pure devotional service. Particularly interesting passages include the instructions of the twenty-four gurus, the Bhiksu-gita and the Aila-gita. There is also an exposition on Varnasrama-dharma, as well as an explanation of the various constituents of material nature. These profound teachings are famed as the Uddhava-gita.

Previous Happiness of Service Next Twenty-Four Gurus Last updated 1 year ago

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29)

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) In response to Uddhava’s heartfelt request, Krishna advised him to embrace renunciation and prepare to leave this world. Seeking guidance on how best to do this, Krishna began His explanations on a variety of topics, focusing in on the glory of pure devotional service. Particularly interesting passages include the instructions of the twenty-four gurus, the Bhiksu-gita and the Aila-gita. There is also an exposition on Varnasrama-dharma, as well as an explanation of the various constituents of material nature. These profound teachings are famed as the Uddhava-gita.

Previous Happiness of Service Next Twenty-Four Gurus Last updated 1 year ago

Avanti Brahmana and Bhiksu-Gita

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Avanti Brahmana and Bhiksu-Gita Chapter 23 Krishna narrated the story of a brahmana from Avanti who was plagued by greed and miserliness, and later found himself being exploited by his very own family members. Aside from them, his wealth was snatched away by thieves, governments, time and ultimately the will of providence. In that dire condition, stripped of everything, left poverty-stricken and alone, a deep feeling of renunciation developed within him. In an outpouring of spiritual realisation, he described the evils that arise with the acquisition of wealth; one loses their character and their relationships, spiralling into more and more misery. He concluded that the time had come to embrace detachment, and thus entered the sannyasa order of life. Begging from door to door, he was often verbally and physically attacked by ignorant persons unaware of his spiritual calibre. The Avanti brahmana , however, was completely fixed. In one celebrated verse, he described how the mind is the cause of all distress, and in another famous verse, known as the ‘sannyasa-mantra,’ he described how one can cross the insurmountable ocean of the material world through unbreakable determination in devotional service.

Previous Understanding Material Nature Next Pururava – Aila-Gita Last updated 2 years ago

Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Chapter 27, 28, 29 Uddhava requested Krishna to detail the process of deity worship. In response, Krishna first explained the different ways in which the deity can appear. The worshipper ( pujari ) must be clean, chant appropriate mantras , use the best paraphernalia possible, recite the holy name, and most of all, offer the worship with genuine devotion. Uddhava was confused: “The material body is dull, while the spirit soul is full of knowledge, so who actually experiences material existence?” Krishna explained that when the soul falsely identifies with the body, this material consciousness manifests, although it is actually like a dream state. Jnana-yoga assists one in distinguishing the spiritual from the material, the eternal from the temporary, and true happiness from fleeting sense enjoyment. Such clarity is required to remain steady and focused on the journey to purity. Krishna then described the yoga practice, which can afford one psychophysical benefits and mystic perfections. After hearing these descriptions, Uddhava requested Krishna to give a conclusive answer on the most effective means of perfection. Krishna again highlighted the supremacy of bhakti-yoga: “Always remembering Me, one should perform all his duties for Me without becoming impetuous. With mind and intelligence offered to Me, one should fix his mind in attraction to My devotional service.” He went on to describe the activities and consciousness of a bhakti-yogi . Krishna then instructed Uddhava to renounce the world and travel to Badarikasrama. The thought of separation overwhelmed Uddhava, who was in tears, but he installed the Lord within his heart and dutifully departed.

Previous Pururava – Aila-Gita Next Uddhava-Gita Last updated 1 year ago

Before and After the Uddhava-Gita

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Before and After the Uddhava-Gita The events preceeding the Uddhava-gita and the subsequent history involving Maitreya and Vidura, are described in several sections of the Srimad-Bhagavatam. After the demigods profusely thanked Krishna for fulfilling His mission on earth, they invited Him to depart. First, Krishna arranged for the Yadu dynasty to be cursed, knowing that only by His arrangement could they be removed from the world. When Uddhava, Krishna’s cousin and dear associate, understood these plans, he requested to depart the world with his Lord. Krishna, however, encouraged Uddhava to prepare for sannyasa , and instructed him in transcendental knowledge (Uddhava-gita), the longest philosophical section in the entire Srimad-Bhagavatam. During His 125 years on Earth, Krishna visited Vrindavana, Mathura, Dwaraka, Hastinapura, other planetary systems, and even Maha Vaikunthaloka. The Lord had not, however, visited Badarikasrama where Nara-Narayana Rishis and the sages were eagerly waiting for Him. Thus, after imparting the knowledge, Krishna instructed Uddhava to travel to Badarikasrama and share the wisdom with them. Uddhava honoured Krishna’s wish and travelled to the North. While Uddhava was en route to Badarikasrama he heard about the Lord’s journey to Prabhasa. Turning back and following Lord Krishna from behind, he saw the Lord alone just after the withdrawal of the Yadu dynasty. The Lord then revealed further knowledge of Himself. It was at this time that Maitreya was present and heard those conversations. [ 37 ] After enlightening Uddhava, Krishna requested them both to leave; Uddhava to Badarikasrama and Maitreya to Haridwar. On his way to Badarikasrama, Uddhava halted in Vrindavana and on the banks of the Yamuna he met Vidura. Their conversation ( Canto Three, Chapters 1 - 4 ) revolved around many of Krishna’s pastimes. Vidura was hungry to know more about Krishna’s final instructions, and Uddhava thus directed him to meet Maitreya in Haridwar, since the Rishi had heard the very same instructions. Uddhava then continued to Badarikasrama, while Vidura and Maitreya met in Haridwar and had an enlightening conversation ( Canto Three, Chapter 5 onwards).

Previous Uddhava-Gita Next Essential Similarities Last updated 1 year ago

Essential Similarities

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Essential Similarities When we examine the Uddhava-gita and Bhagavad-gita, we clearly see that Krishna was teaching the same essential principles in both discourses. Here are some examples: 1) Comprehensiveness of the Knowledge: Bhagavad-gita 7.2: “I shall now declare unto you in full this knowledge, both phenomenal and numinous. This being known, nothing further shall remain for you to know.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.32: “When an inquisitive person comes to understand this knowledge, he has nothing further to know. After all, one who has drunk the most palatable nectar cannot remain thirsty.” 2) Studying the Conversation: Bhagavad-gita 18.70: “And I declare that he who studies this sacred conversation of ours worships Me by his intelligence.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.27-28: “He who loudly recites this supreme knowledge, which is the most lucid and purifying, becomes purified day by day, for he reveals Me to others with the lamp of transcendental knowledge. Anyone who regularly listens to this knowledge with faith and attention, all the while engaging in My pure devotional service, will never become bound by the reactions of material work.” 3) Sharing the Wisdom: Bhagavad-gita 18.68-69: “For one who explains this supreme secret to the devotees, pure devotional service is guaranteed, and at the end he will come back to Me. There is no servant in this world more dear to Me than he, nor will there ever be one more dear.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.26: “One who liberally disseminates this knowledge among My devotees is the bestower of the Absolute Truth, and to him I give My very own self.” 4) Concluding Words: Bhagavad-gita 18.65 - 66 : “Always think of Me, become My devotee, worship Me and offer your homage unto Me. Thus you will come to Me without fail. I promise you this because you are My very dear friend. Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.34: “A person who gives up all fruitive activities and offers himself entirely unto Me, eagerly desiring to render service unto Me, achieves liberation from birth and death and is promoted to the status of sharing My own opulences.” 5) Qualification to Understand: Bhagavad-gita 18.67: “This confidential knowledge may never be explained to those who are not austere, or devoted, or engaged in devotional service, nor to one who is envious of Me.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.30: “You should not share this instruction with anyone who is hypocritical, atheistic or dishonest, or with anyone who will not listen faithfully, who is not a devotee, or who is simply not humble.” 6) Effect on Listener: Bhagavad-gita 18.72 - 73 : Krishna: “O son of Prtha, O conqueror of wealth, have you heard this with an attentive mind? And are your ignorance and illusions now dispelled?” Arjuna: “My dear Krishna, O infallible one, my illusion is now gone. I have regained my memory by Your mercy. I am now firm and free from doubt and am prepared to act according to Your instructions.” Srimad-Bhagavatam 11.29.29 / 37 : Krishna: “My dear friend Uddhava, have you now completely understood this transcendental knowledge? Are the confusion and lamentation that arose in your mind now dispelled?” Uddhava: “O unborn, primeval Lord, although I had fallen into the great darkness of illusion, my ignorance has now been dispelled by Your merciful association. Indeed, how can cold, darkness and fear exert their power over one who has approached the brilliant sun?”

Previous Before and After the Uddhava-Gita Next M - Mausala-lila (30-31) Last updated 1 year ago

Uddhava-Gita

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Uddhava-Gita “The word sampatitam indicates that the falldown of the living entity is complete. In other words, he cannot get up again. Sri Uddhava therefore appeals to the Lord to be kind to these poor fallen souls, humbly represented by his own self. If one receives the Lord’s mercy, then even without any further qualification one can go back home, back to Godhead; and without the mercy of Lord Krishna, the most learned, austere, powerful, wealthy or beautiful man will be pathetically crushed by the material world’s machinery of illusion. The Supreme Personality of Godhead, as described here, is mahanubhava , or the greatest, most powerful and most merciful personality, whose influence extends everywhere. The Lord’s mercy is manifest in the form of His nectarean instructions such as Bhagavad-gita and the Uddhava-gita, being spoken here.” (11.19.10) The Uddhava-gita is an expansion of the Bhagavad-gita. Srila Prabhupada explains: “Undoubtedly, the Bhagavad-gita was spoken by the Lord on the Battlefield of Kuruksetra just to encourage Arjuna to fight, and yet to complete the transcendental knowledge of Bhagavad-gita, the Lord instructed Uddhava. The Lord wanted Uddhava to fulfill His mission and disseminate knowledge which He had not spoken even in Bhagavad-gita.” (SB 3.4.32)

Previous Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Next Before and After the Uddhava-Gita Last updated 2 years ago

Entanglement, Liberation and Pure Love

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Entanglement, Liberation and Pure Love Chapter 10, 11, 12 Sukadeva Goswami continued narrating the instructions of Krishna to Uddhava. All forms of material enjoyment, even to the point of heavenly pleasures, are limited, temporary and full of duality. In the futile pursuit of such experiences, one degrades himself more and more. The entangled spirit soul begins the journey ‘back to purity’ after receiving transcendental knowledge from a spiritual master. By cultivating the mood and qualities of a true disciple, following transcendental instructions and engaging one’s propensities within the Varnasrama system, one gains release from material entanglement. Like two birds in a tree, the Lord and living entity reside within the body. The Lord is eternally liberated, sitting as an observer, while the conditioned soul perpetually tries to enjoy the fruits of the tree. When the soul is awakened to real knowledge he becomes liberated, and even though residing within the body, becomes completely detached from the enjoying spirit, never considering himself the ‘doer.’ The ultimate purpose of material detachment and Vedic study is to usher one into a loving relationship with the Lord. Such connection with the Lord, and the subsequent practice of devotional activities, causes numerous saintly qualities to manifest in one’s character. The most essential quality is surrender to Krishna since, it triggers all subsequent qualities to automatically appear. In conclusion, Krishna glorified the Vrindavana gopis , whose standard of love is beyond compare. Their deep attachment meant that every moment was spent in consciousness of Krishna. More important than gaining volumes of knowledge, Krishna explained, is to follow in their footsteps and develop a similar intensity of surrender and devotion.

Previous Twenty-Four Gurus Next Topmost Yoga System Last updated 1 year ago

Knowledge to Bhakti

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Knowledge to Bhakti Chapter 19, 20, 21 Transcendental knowledge of the Lord should translate into an awakening of pure bhakti . All regulations, duties and recommendations of sastra are meant to bring one to this spontaneous devotion. After Uddhava asked a range of wonderful questions, Krishna, amongst other things, described the character of a self-realised soul and the deeper meaning of being tolerant, charitable, austere, heroic and truthful. He explained the real substance of happiness in life and who is actually a genuine friend. Though unalloyed bhakti is the ultimate goal, scriptures may promote various practices of study, austerity and fruitive work in a bid to gradually elevate the religious practitioner to a higher level of purity. Human birth on the earthly planets is the most wondrous gift, since it affords the soul the best opportunity to perfect life and escape material entanglement. Thus, by good fortune, if one begins the path of bhakti and attains the platform of pure devotion, relative considerations of purity and impurity no longer affect them. Such persons transcend good and bad karma.

Previous Varnasrama Next Understanding Material Nature Last updated 1 year ago

Pururava – Aila-Gita

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Pururava – Aila-Gita Chapter 26 Krishna recounted the history of Emperor Pururava, also known as Aila, who was attracted by the heavenly damsel, Urvasi. [ 36 ] After marrying her and later being separated, he was devastated, but eventually developed a deep spirit of renunciation. He expressed his innermost feelings in a song known as the Aila-gita: Absorbed in sense gratification, one becomes oblivious to the passing of time, neglecting the real purpose of life. Of material pleasures, sexual attraction is overwhelmingly strong, able to trap even the most powerful personalities in a web of illusion. Lust is ever-demanding and never satiated, and only one awakened by spiritual knowledge can break free. Though the body is temporary machinery, it’s packaged in such a way as to attract the mind. Thus, one must be constantly vigilant, avoid material enjoyers, and instead find the saintly souls who can cut such dangerous attachments of the mind with their sharpened words of wisdom. Freed from his material illusion, the Emperor attained perfect realisation of the Supreme Lord.

Previous Avanti Brahmana and Bhiksu-Gita Next Deity Worship and Bhakti-Yoga Last updated 2 years ago

Topmost Yoga System

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Topmost Yoga System Chapter 13, 14, 15, 16 Krishna stressed the necessity of developing the mode of goodness ( sattva ) in one’s mindset, lifestyle and habits, and then eventually transcending it through devotion. Fascinated, Uddhava asked the Lord to repeat the instructions He had previously imparted regarding this. Once, when Brahma was questioned by his sons, headed by Sanaka, about overcoming desires for sense gratification, the engineer of the universe felt incapable of answering and turned to the Lord for assistance. Appearing in the form of a swan ( Hamsa-avatara ), the Lord explained the nature of the mind. Not only is the mind drawn towards sense objects, but sense objects enter within the mind. Only by fixing the mind on the Lord, can one escape its devious influence. When we see the material energy independently of Krishna, it is likened to a dream state. For such persons, whether in wakefulness, sleep or deep sleep, all three are illusory since their grasp of reality is fundamentally flawed. Krishna reassured Uddhava that even if one is unable to give up sense gratification, the power of devotional service will eventually elevate them to the perfectional stage. With a vigilant eye, one should guard against the temptations of sense gratification, and learn to practice with the heart. When Uddhava desired clarification on which yoga system is most evolved, Krishna described the various mystic perfections (eight primary and ten secondary) and the processes to obtain them. The Lord then emphasised that practice of devotional service ( bhakti-yoga ) bears all these fruits, and most importantly connects one to the Supreme Person in a very intimate way. The Lord becomes conquered by pure devotion. Just as Krishna described His opulences to Arjuna in the Bhagavad-gita, Krishna explained to Uddhava how He is the essence of everything found in the world.

Previous Entanglement, Liberation and Pure Love Next Varnasrama Last updated 1 year ago

Twenty-Four Gurus

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Twenty-Four Gurus Chapter 7, 8, 9 Sukadeva Goswami continued narrating the conversation between Krishna and Uddhava. Krishna confirmed He was indeed leaving the world. He urged Uddhava to embrace sannyasa and plan his departure too, since Kali-yuga would soon begin. Uddhava, feeling himself lowly and unqualified, requested an injection of transcendental knowledge to awaken his natural detachment. Krishna first explained how an intelligent person can observe the world around them and decipher powerful lessons to elevate their consciousness. To illustrate this, He narrated the story of an avadhuta brahmana who was wandering carefree in deep spiritual ecstasy. When Maharaja Yadu questioned him on how he attained such an enlightened state, the brahmana replied by delineating the 24 gurus through whom he received profound spiritual instruction. Some key lessons from these gurus are below (not an exhaustive analysis): • Earth: One should remain undisturbed by aggressors and instead be absorbed in selfless service to others. • Air: Though surrounded by material objects, and situated within a material body, one must learn to remain aloof and untouched. • Sky: The individual soul and Supersoul never mix with anything nor can be divided by anything. • Water: Saintly persons are purifying and pleasing, constantly moving and enlightening others with the beautiful sound of their words. • Fire: One should absorb things and yet remain untained by them – saintly persons, for example, can incinerate the karmic reactions of their followers and remain unaffected. • Moon: Apparent changes in the body do not affect the soul, which remains constant and unchanged. • Sun: One should accept material objects and then utilise them at the appropriate time, remaining unsullied in the process. • Pigeon: One must be careful of excessive affection and attachment, which inevitably causes suffering. • Python: One should avoid excessive endeavours for material preservation, and instead remain focused on one’s real spiritual self-interest. • Ocean: Regardless of success or failure, prosperity or struggle, one must remain steady and serene. • Moth: One must not fall prey to the allurement of sense objects, of which attraction to the opposite sex is foremost. • Honeybee: One must guard against greed and over-consumption, only accepting what is required for his daily maintenance. • Elephant: One should carefully avoid exploiting and enjoying the opposite sex, lest they create more complexities for themselves. • Honey Thief: If one acquires wealth and greedily stores it, he will inevitably be plundered. • Deer: Saintly renunciates should avoid mundane entertainment in the form of singing, dance or music. • Fish: Failing to control the urges of the tongue will likely cause one’s spiritual downfall. • Pingala: Having unsuccessfully tried to enjoy the material world, one should develop detachment from the illusory pursuits of material family, friendship and love. • Kurara Bird: By renouncing attachment and possessiveness, one experiences spiritual happiness. • Child: One who gives up concerns of home, children and reputation can wander freely without any anxiety. • Young Girl and Bracelets: When people live communally there is inevitably conflict, disagreement and frivolous conversation. • Arrow Maker: Through yoga practice, one must steady the mind and focus it on the Supreme Lord without deviation. • Snake: One should avoid making complicated practical arrangements, and rather accept a simple lifestyle for maintenance of the body. • Spider: The Lord utilises His energies to create the cosmic manifestation, which eventually reenters within Himself again. • Wasp: Whatever one constantly meditates on, that he will surely become.

Previous U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Next Entanglement, Liberation and Pure Love Last updated 1 year ago

Understanding Material Nature

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Understanding Material Nature Chapter 22, 24, 25 Material nature ( prakrti ), which is constituted of different material elements, is impregnated by the glance of the Supreme ( purusa ). These material elements are analysed and quantified by different philosophers in different ways, since various elements evolve from each other and are closely related. When the living entity harbours material desires, he becomes entangled in the cycle of samsara , entering various gross bodies according to the different modes of material nature. The mind accompanies the soul through its material sojourn. A wise person disassociates himself from material nature, which is full of frustration, and thus remains on the safe, spiritual platform. The Avanti brahmana is a prime example (narrated in next section). Sankhya philosophy delineates the evolution of various material elements. After they are manifested, secondary creation is overseen by Brahma, who is born upon a lotus stem. Various planetary realms are created for living entities possessing different karmic configurations. The philosophy of sankhya is ultimately aimed at helping one develop a sense of detachment, seeing that material nature is real, but temporary. All elements eventually merge back into each other, and then ultimately into the body of the Lord. The modes of nature, each with their unique characteristics, pervade every aspect of the material reality. When a particular mode defeats the others, there are clear, observable symptoms. Krishna goes on to describe the activities, knowledge, environment, approach to work, faith, food, happiness and final destination of those in different modes. The ultimate way to transcend such material influence is through the practice of devotional service.

Previous Knowledge to Bhakti Next Avanti Brahmana and Bhiksu-Gita Last updated 2 years ago

Varnasrama

U - Uddhava-gita (7-29) Varnasrama Chapter 17, 18 Satya-yuga was populated with one class of spotless individuals, known as hamsa , but after the cosmic cycle entered Treta-yuga, the system of Varnasrama was introduced. Each division of occupation ( varna ) and order of life ( asrama ) has its unique role and responsibility, and specific character traits which identify it. In summary, Krishna concluded: “The main religious duties of a sannyasi are equanimity and nonviolence, whereas for the vanaprastha austerity and philosophical understanding of the difference between the body and soul are prominent. The main duties of a householder are to give shelter to all living entities and perform sacrifices, and the brahmacari is mainly engaged in serving the spiritual master.” Beyond all such divisions is the paramahamsa , who has purified the heart and is intimately connected with the Lord.

Previous Topmost Yoga System Next Knowledge to Bhakti Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.1

↗
श्रीभगवानुवाच य एतान् मत्पथो हित्वा भक्तिज्ञानक्रियात्मकान् । क्षुद्रान् कामांश्चलै: प्राणैर्जुषन्त: संसरन्ति ते ॥ १ ॥
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
[shree-bhagavaan uvaacha]
ya etān mat-patho hitvā
[ya etaan mat-patho hitvaa]
bhakti-jñāna-kriyātmakān
[bhakti-jnaana-kriyaatmakaan]
kṣudrān kāmāṁś calaiḥ prāṇair
[kshudraan kaamaamsh chalaih praanair]
juṣantaḥ saṁsaranti te
[jushantah samsaranti te]
śrī-bhagavān uvāca — the Supreme Personality of Godhead said ye — those who etān — these mat-pathaḥ — means for achieving Me hitvā — giving up bhakti — devotional service jñāna — analytic philosophy kriyā — regulated work ātmakān — consisting of kṣudrān — insignificant kāmān — sense gratification calaiḥ — by the flickering prāṇaiḥ — senses juṣantaḥ — cultivating saṁsaranti — undergo material existence te — they.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
the Supreme Personality of Godhead said
ye
those who
ya etān mat-patho hitvā
etān
these
mat-pathaḥ
means for achieving Me
hitvā
giving up
bhakti-jñāna-kriyātmakān
bhakti
devotional service
jñāna
analytic philosophy
kriyā
regulated work
ātmakān
consisting of
kṣudrān kāmāṁś calaiḥ prāṇair
kṣudrān
insignificant
kāmān
sense gratification
calaiḥ
by the flickering
prāṇaiḥ
senses
juṣantaḥ saṁsaranti te
juṣantaḥ
cultivating
saṁsaranti
undergo material existence
te
they.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: Those who give up these methods for achieving Me, which consist of devotional service, analytic philosophy and regulated execution of prescribed duties, and instead, being moved by the material senses, cultivate insignificant sense gratification, certainly undergo the continual cycle of material existence.

As clearly explained by Lord Kṛṣṇa in the previous chapters, philosophical analysis and also the performance of prescribed duties are ultimately meant for achieving Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or pure love of God. Devotional service, based on hearing and chanting the glories of the Lord, directly engages the conditioned soul in the Lord’s loving service and thus is the most efficient means of achieving the Lord. All three processes, however, share a common goal, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Now the Lord describes those who, being completely absorbed in material sense gratification, do not adopt any authorized means to achieve the Lord’s mercy. Currently, hundreds of millions of unfortunate human beings fit squarely into this category and, as described here, perpetually suffer the bondage of material existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Lord said: Those who give up my methods, bhakti, jñāna and niṣkāma-karma, and instead cultivate insignificant sense enjoyment by the fickle senses, undergo the continual cycle of material existence. In the Twenty-first Chapter the good and bad aspects of those involved in karma are discussed and the meaning of the scriptures in this regard is explained. Sakāma-karma is criticized. Lack of proper ending on mat-pathaḥ is poetic license. Bhakti gives attainment of the Lord. Jñāna gives attainment of impersonal Brahman. Niṣkāma-karma indirectly gives impersonal Brahman. Sakāma-karma gives Svarga or earthly kingdom.
Those who abandon devotion, philosophy, and prescribed duty for sense gratification driven by the senses fall into birth and death. Three legitimate roads abandoned for a side trail leads nowhere good.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of the three — devotion, philosophy, prescribed duty — am I quietly drifting from?
  • Where does the side trail of sense gratification still attract me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.2

↗
स्वे स्वेऽधिकारे या निष्ठा स गुण: परिकीर्तित: । विपर्ययस्तु दोष: स्यादुभयोरेष निश्चय: ॥ २ ॥
sve sve ’dhikāre yā niṣṭhā
[sve sve ’dhikaare yaa nishthaa]
sa guṇaḥ parikīrtitaḥ
[sa gunah parikeertitah]
viparyayas tu doṣaḥ syād
[viparyayas tu doshah syaad]
ubhayor eṣa niścayaḥ
[ubhayor esha nishchayah]
sve sve — each in his own adhikāre — position yā — such niṣṭhā — steadiness saḥ — this guṇaḥ — piety parikīrtitaḥ — is declared to be viparyayaḥ — the opposite tu — indeed doṣaḥ — impiety syāt — is ubhayoḥ — of the two eṣaḥ — this niścayaḥ — the definite conclusion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sve sve ’dhikāre yā niṣṭhā
sve sve
each in his own
sa guṇaḥ parikīrtitaḥ
viparyayas tu doṣaḥ syād
adhikāre
position
ubhayor eṣa niścayaḥ
yā
such
niṣṭhā
steadiness
saḥ
this
guṇaḥ
piety
parikīrtitaḥ
is declared to be
viparyayaḥ
the opposite
tu
indeed
doṣaḥ
impiety
syāt
is
ubhayoḥ
of the two
eṣaḥ
this
niścayaḥ
the definite conclusion.
Steadiness in one’s own position is declared to be actual piety, whereas deviation from one’s position is considered impiety. In this way the two are definitely ascertained.

In the previous verse Lord Kṛṣṇa explained that the path of spiritual progress begins with working without fruitive desires, advances to the stage of realized spiritual knowledge, and culminates in direct engagement in the devotional service of the Lord. Here the Lord emphasizes that a conditioned soul should not artificially disrupt the natural evolution of his Kṛṣṇa consciousness by deviating from those duties prescribed by the Lord Himself. In the lower stages of human life one is entangled in false identification with the gross material body and desires to execute material fruitive activities based on society, friendship and love. When such materialistic activities are offered in sacrifice to the Supreme Lord, one becomes situated in karma-yoga. By regulated sacrifice one gradually gives up the gross bodily concept of life and advances to the stage of realization of spiritual knowledge, whereby one understands oneself to be an eternal spirit soul completely different from the material body and mind. Feeling relief from the pangs of materialism one becomes very attached to one’s spiritual knowledge, and thus one is situated in the stage of jñāna-yoga. As the candidate further advances on the spiritual path, he understands himself to be part and parcel of the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa. He then sees that his conditional life as well as his spiritual knowledge was obtained from the Personality of Godhead, who awards the results of all types of activities, both pious and sinful. By directly engaging in the loving service of the Supreme Lord and understanding oneself to be the Lord’s eternal servant, one’s attachment evolves into pure love of Godhead. Thus one first gives up the lower stage of attachment to the material body and then subsequently gives up attachment to cultivation of spiritual knowledge. This relieves one of material life. Finally one recognizes the Lord Himself as the resting place of one’s eternal love and fully surrenders to God in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

Lord Kṛṣṇa explains in this verse that one who is still attached to the material body and mind cannot artificially give up the prescribed duties of karma-yoga. In the same way, one who is a spiritual neophyte, just beginning to realize the illusion of material life, should not artificially try to think of the Lord’s intimate pastimes twenty-four hours a day, imitating the stage of prema-bhakti. Rather, he should cultivate analytic knowledge of the material world, by which one gives up attachment to the material body and mind. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam we find many analytic descriptions of the material world, and they can free the conditioned soul from false identification with matter. One who has achieved the perfect stage of love of Godhead, however, being freed from all gross and subtle attachments to the material world, may give up the lower stages of karma-yoga and jñāna-yoga and engage directly in the Lord’s loving service.

In Chapter Nineteen, verse 45, Lord Kṛṣṇa states, guṇa-doṣa-dṛśir doṣo guṇas tūbhaya-varjitaḥ. One should not see material good and evil within a devotee of the Lord. Indeed, one becomes pious by giving up such mundane conceptions. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura points out that occasionally a neophyte devotee may be polluted by association with those enthusiastically executing fruitive activities and mental speculation. Such a devotee’s religious activities may be affected by mundane tendencies. Similarly, an ordinary person who observes the exalted status of a pure devotee sometimes externally imitates the devotee’s activities, considering himself to be on the same exalted platform of pure devotional service. These imperfect practitioners of bhakti-yoga are not exempt from criticism, since their fruitive activities, mental speculation and false prestige are material intrusions in the pure loving service of the Lord. A pure devotee engaged exclusively in the Lord’s service should not be criticized, but a devotee whose devotional service is mixed with material qualities may be corrected so that he can rise to the platform of pure devotional service. Innocent persons should not be misled by the mixed devotional service of those not engaged exclusively in the bhakti-yoga system, but those unable to fully engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness should nevertheless not give up their regular prescribed duties, declaring them to be illusion. For example, one unable to fully engage in pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness should not give up his family, considering it an illusion, for by doing so he will fall into illicit sex life. Material piety and analytic knowledge of the material world must therefore be cultivated until one comes to the stage of directly practicing Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being fixed according to one’s qualification is a good quality, and to be fixed in something not of one’s qualification is a bad quality. This is how good and bad are determined. “I asked you what a good quality is and what a bad quality is. You answered that it is a fault to see good and bad in the devotees and a good quality not to see good and bad in them. I have this doubt. If someone has faith in your topics and is qualified for pure bhakti, but by fate falls under the control of karmīs or jñānīs, follows them, and performs karma, distasteful as drinking medicine, or practices jñāna, is seeing fault in his bhakti a bad quality and not seeing fault a good quality? Moreover, if someone, a karmī or jñānī, does not obtain complete faith in bhakti since he does not obtain mercy of great devotees, but by seeing the excellence of a devotee, gives up his duties according to his qualification with a desire to attain such excellence and begins worshipping the Lord and announced that he is a devotee, should one see good qualities or bad qualities in that imposter, a cheater of the world?” Please hear about the nature of good and bad qualities. The jñānī fixed in his qualification for jñāna and the karmī fixed in his qualification for karma are approved as good. However, because both cannot give their results by themselves, karma and jñāna must be performed with a mixture of bhakti. Otherwise they do not give any result. naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ na śobhate jñānam alaṁ nirañjanam Even the stage of jñāna without the bondage of karma, if devoid of bhakti to the Supreme Lord, is not glorious. SB 1.5.12 On the other hand, being fixed in bhakti, as is done by the śuddha-bhakta, is a good quality since bhakti has the power to give its own result. Bhakti should not be performed with any mixture of karma or jñāna, since those processes cannot give independent results anyway. dharmān santyajya yaḥ sarvān māṁ bhajeta sa tu sattamaḥ A person who, understanding good and bad aspects of dharma as taught by me, gives up all his duties and simply worships me is the best of all. SB 11.11.32 tasmān mad-bhakti-yuktasya yogino vai mad-ātmanaḥ na jñānaṁ na ca vairāgyaṁ prāyaḥ śreyo bhaved iha Therefore, for a devotee engaged in bhakti, with mind fixed on me, the cultivation of knowledge and renunciation is generally not beneficial for bhakti. SB 11.20.31 By this it is understood that if there is a mixture of karma or jñāna, pure bhakti disappears. To be fixed in the opposite, someone else’s qualification is fault. This is how good and bad are determined.
Real piety is steadiness in one's own position; deviation is impiety. The standard is internal-to-the-path, not external comparison.
Reflection Questions
  • What is my 'own position', and have I been steady in it?
  • Where do I judge others' positions instead of holding my own?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.3

↗
शुद्ध्यशुद्धी विधीयेते समानेष्वपि वस्तुषु । द्रव्यस्य विचिकित्सार्थं गुणदोषौ शुभाशुभौ । धर्मार्थं व्यवहारार्थं यात्रार्थमिति चानघ ॥ ३ ॥
śuddhy-aśuddhī vidhīyete
[shuddhy-ashuddhee vidheeyete]
samāneṣv api vastuṣu
[samaaneshv api vastushu]
dravyasya vicikitsārthaṁ
[dravyasya vichikitsaartham]
guṇa-doṣau śubhāśubhau
[guna-doshau shubhaashubhau]
dharmārthaṁ vyavahārārthaṁ
[dharmaartham vyavahaaraartham]
yātrārtham iti cānagha
[yaatraartham iti chaanagha]
śuddhi — purity aśuddhī — and impurity vidhīyete — are established samāneṣu — of the same category api — indeed vastuṣu — among objects dravyasya — of a particular object vicikitsā — evaluation artham — for the purpose of guṇa-doṣau — good and bad qualities śubha-aśubhau — auspicious and inauspicious dharma-artham — for the purpose of religious activities vyavahāra-artham — for the purpose of ordinary dealings yātrā-artham — for one’s physical survival iti — thus ca — also anagha — O sinless one.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śuddhy-aśuddhī vidhīyete
śuddhi
purity
aśuddhī
and impurity
vidhīyete
are established
samāneṣv api vastuṣu
samāneṣu
of the same category
api
indeed
vastuṣu
among objects
dravyasya vicikitsārthaṁ
dravyasya
of a particular object
vicikitsā
evaluation
artham
for the purpose of
guṇa-doṣau śubhāśubhau
guṇa-doṣau
good and bad qualities
śubha-aśubhau
auspicious and inauspicious
dharmārthaṁ vyavahārārthaṁ
dharma-artham
for the purpose of religious activities
vyavahāra-artham
for the purpose of ordinary dealings
yātrārtham iti cānagha
yātrā-artham
for one’s physical survival
iti
thus
ca
also
anagha
O sinless one.
O sinless Uddhava, in order to understand what is proper in life one must evaluate a given object within its particular category. Thus, in analyzing religious principles one must consider purity and impurity. Similarly, in one’s ordinary dealings one must distinguish between good and bad, and to insure one’s physical survival one must recognize that which is auspicious and inauspicious.

In religious activities, ordinary dealings and personal survival one cannot avoid value judgements. Morality and religion are perennial necessities in civilized society; therefore distinctions between purity and impurity, piety and impiety, morality and immorality must somehow be ascertained. Similarly, in our ordinary, worldly activities we distinguish between palatable and tasteless food, good and bad business, high-class and low-class residences, good and bad friends, and so forth. And to insure our physical health and survival, we must constantly distinguish between what is safe and unsafe, healthy and unhealthy, profitable and unprofitable. Even a learned person must constantly distinguish between good and bad within the material world, but at the same time he must understand the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Despite one’s careful calculation of that which is materially healthy and unhealthy, the physical body will collapse and die. Despite careful scrutiny of the socially favorable and unfavorable, one’s entire social milieu will vanish with the passing of time. In the same way, great religions arise and disappear in the course of history. Thus mere religiosity, social and financial expertise or physical fitness cannot award the actual perfection of life. There is a transcendental good beyond the relative good of the material world. Any sane person accepts the practical and immediate necessity of material discrimination; yet one must come ultimately to the transcendental stage of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, where life is eternal, full of bliss and knowledge. Lord Kṛṣṇa, in His elaborate teachings to Śrī Uddhava, is gradually clarifying the transcendental position of Kṛṣṇa consciousness beyond the endless variety of material good and evil.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O sinless Uddhava! In order to resolve doubts about certain objects among general objects, they are established as good or bad, pure or impure, auspicious or inauspicious. In terms of dharma they are classed as pure or impure. In terms of common dealings they are classed as good and bad, and in terms of circumstance they are classed as auspicious or inauspicious. The diversity of good and bad is immense. I will describe it. Please listen. In order to destroy doubts about an object, whether it is proper or improper, such as “Is it proper or improper to use smoke to drive out the mosquitoes?” among common elements mentioned in verse 5, judgments of good and bad, auspicious and inauspicious are applied. For instance among leaves, roots and fruits, vāstuka leaves are pure and kalambī leaves are impure. These are used for judging dharma in terms pure and impure. What is pure is dharma and what is impure is adharma. It is applied in ordinary dealings as good quality and fault. If approved behavior is seen in someone impure, it is a good quality and if one does not seen that good behavior in the impure person it is a fault. It is applied according to circumstance (yathārtham) as auspicious and inauspicious. Though hoarding is inauspicious, in times of calamity collecting for survival is auspicious, though excessive hoarding is still inauspicious and a sin.
Evaluate things within their own category — religious by purity and impurity, ordinary by good and bad, survival by helpful and harmful. The right ruler for the right object.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I apply the wrong ruler to a situation?
  • What category does my current question really belong to?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.4

↗
दर्शितोऽयं मयाचारो धर्ममुद्वहतां धुरम् ॥ ४ ॥
darśito ’yaṁ mayācāro
[darshito ’yam mayaachaaro]
dharmam udvahatāṁ dhuram
[dharmam udvahataam dhuram]
darśitaḥ — revealed ayam — this mayā — by Me ācāraḥ — way of life dharmam — religious principles udvahatām — for those who are bearing dhuram — the burden.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
darśito ’yaṁ mayācāro
darśitaḥ
revealed
ayam
this
dharmam udvahatāṁ dhuram
mayā
by Me
ācāraḥ
way of life
dharmam
religious principles
udvahatām
for those who are bearing
dhuram
the burden.
I have revealed this way of life for those bearing the burden of mundane religious principles.

Ordinary religious principles, prescribing innumerable rules, regulations and prohibitions, are undoubtedly a great burden for those bereft of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. In the First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.1.11) it is stated, bhūrīṇi bhūri-karmāṇi śrotavyāni vibhāgaśaḥ: there are countless religious scriptures in the world prescribing countless religious duties. The authorized scriptures are those spoken by the Lord Himself or His representatives, as stated in this verse. In the last chapter of Bhagavad-gītā (18.66) Lord Kṛṣṇa states, sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja: one should give up the troublesome burden of mundane piety and directly take to the loving service of the Lord, in which everything is simplified. Lord Kṛṣṇa also states in Bhagavad-gītā (9.2) , su-sukhaṁ kartum avyayam: the bhakti-yoga process, which depends completely upon the mercy of the Lord, is very joyful and easily performed. Similarly, Locana dāsa Ṭhākura sings,

parama karuṇa, pahuṅ dui jana, nitāi-gauracandra saba avatāra-, sāra-śiromaṇi, kevala ānanda-kāṇḍa

Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, who is Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself, appeared five hundred years ago to distribute the sublime method of chanting the holy names of the Lord. In this way, rather than bearing the burden of artificial austerity, one can directly take to the Lord’s service, cleansing one’s heart and immediately experiencing transcendental bliss. Those who have taken to Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s movement follow four basic principles: no illicit sex, no eating of meat, fish or eggs, no intoxication and no gambling. They rise early in the morning, chant Hare Kṛṣṇa and spend the day happily engaged in the Lord’s service. Those who follow the ritualistic karma-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas, however, are burdened with innumerable regulations, rituals and ceremonies, which must be personally performed by the worshipers or performed on their behalf by qualified brāhmaṇas. At any moment there is danger of discrepancy resulting in the total loss of their accumulated piety. Similarly, those on the philosophical path must painstakingly define, refine and adjust philosophical categories, a process that generally ends in confusion and hopelessness. The practitioners of mystic yoga undergo grueling penances, subjecting themselves to severe heat and cold, near starvation and so on. All such materialistic persons have personal desires to fulfill, whereas the devotees of the Lord, who desire the Lord’s pleasure, simply depend upon the Lord’s mercy and go back home, back to Godhead. In the previous verse the Lord mentioned that in the material world there are endless distinctions and value judgements to be made in the course of one’s life. A devotee, however, sees Kṛṣṇa within everything and everything within Kṛṣṇa, remaining humble, simple and blissful in the Lord’s service. He does not perform elaborate religious ceremonies, nor does he become antisocial or immoral. The devotee simply chants the holy name of Kṛṣṇa and easily achieves the highest perfection of life. Ordinary persons endeavor for bodily maintenance, but a devotee is automatically maintained by the Lord’s mercy. A devotee’s ordinary dealings and religious activities are also all dedicated to the Personality of Godhead; thus there is nothing but Kṛṣṇa in a devotee’s life. Kṛṣṇa gives all protection and maintenance, and the devotee gives everything to Kṛṣṇa. This natural liberated situation is called Kṛṣṇa consciousness. It is the ultimate absolute good, as explained by the Lord throughout this canto.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I have revealed this way of life for persons bearing the burden of dharma. I, in the form of Manu and others, have shown this conduct for persons responsible for instituting dharma.
The Lord has revealed this way of life for those bearing the burden of mundane religious principles. Even for those still attached to ritual, there is a roadmap.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'mundane religious burden' do I still carry?
  • Could the Lord's roadmap relieve some of its weight?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.5

↗
भूम्यम्ब्वग्‍न्यनिलाकाशा भूतानां पञ्चधातव: । आब्रह्मस्थावरादीनां शारीरा आत्मसंयुता: ॥ ५ ॥
bhūmy-ambv-agny-anilākāśā
[bhoomy-ambv-agny-anilaakaashaa]
bhūtānāṁ pañca-dhātavaḥ
[bhootaanaam pancha-dhaatavah]
ā-brahma-sthāvarādīnāṁ
[aa-brahma-sthaavaraadeenaam]
śārīrā ātma-saṁyutāḥ
[shaareeraa aatma-samyutaah]
bhūmi — earth ambu — water agni — fire anila — air ākāśāḥ — sky or ether bhūtānām — of all conditioned souls pañca — the five dhātavaḥ — basic elements ā-brahma — from Lord Brahmā sthāvara-ādīnām — down to the nonmoving creatures śārīrāḥ — used for the construction of the material bodies ātma — to the Supreme Soul saṁyutāḥ — equally related.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhūmy-ambv-agny-anilākāśā
bhūmi
earth
ambu
water
agni
fire
anila
air
ākāśāḥ
sky or ether
bhūtānāṁ pañca-dhātavaḥ
bhūtānām
of all conditioned souls
pañca
the five
dhātavaḥ
basic elements
ā-brahma
from Lord Brahmā
ā-brahma-sthāvarādīnāṁ
sthāvara-ādīnām
down to the nonmoving creatures
śārīrā ātma-saṁyutāḥ
śārīrāḥ
used for the construction of the material bodies
ātma
to the Supreme Soul
saṁyutāḥ
equally related.
Earth, water, fire, air and ether are the five basic elements that constitute the bodies of all conditioned souls, from Lord Brahmā himself down to the nonmoving creatures. These elements all emanate from the one Personality of Godhead.

All material bodies are composed of different proportions of the same five gross elements, which emanate from the one Personality of Godhead and cover the living entities, who are all in the jīva category.

The concepts of good and bad depend on the choice of the Supreme Lord and not on inherent qualitative differences in material objects. A Kṛṣṇa conscious person ultimately sees all material phenomena as one. The devotee’s good behavior, intelligent discrimination and artistic sense within the material world are all based on the will of God. The material elements, being emanations from the Supreme Lord, are ultimately all nondifferent. However, advocates of mundane piety fear that if the material duality of good and bad is minimized, people will become immoral or anarchistic. Certainly the impersonal and atheistic philosophy preached by modern scientists, in which material variety is reduced to mere mathematical descriptions of molecular and atomic particles, leads to immoral society. Although both material science and Vedic knowledge uncover the illusion of material variety and reveal the ultimate oneness of all material energy, only the devotees of Lord Kṛṣṇa are surrendered to the supreme absolute piety of God’s will. Thus they always act for the benefit of all living entities, accepting material variety in the Lord’s service, according to the Lord’s desire. Without Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or God consciousness, people cannot understand the absolute position of spiritual goodness; instead they artificially try to construct a civilization based on interdependent self-interest on the material platform. Such a foolish arrangement easily collapses, as evidenced by widespread social conflict and chaos in the modern age. All members of a civilized society must accept the absolute authority of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and then social peace and harmony will not rest on the flimsy relative platform of mundane piety and sin.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Earth, water, fire, air and ether are the five basic elements that constitute the bodies of all beings from Brahmā down to the nonmoving creatures. They are all endowed with ātmā. You have said to me: guṇa-doṣa-bhidā-dṛṣṭir nigamāt te na hi svataḥ The distinction observed between piety and sin comes from your own Vedic knowledge and does not arise by itself. SB 11.20.5 That is true, but the Vedas do this to help the population. This is expressed in two verses. Dhatavaḥ means “those things which support.” It refers to the elements starting with earth. These elements constitute the bodies of Brahmā and the plants. All bodies are thus similar. The bodies however are endowed with the ātmā.
All bodies, from Brahmā to plants, are made of earth, water, fire, air, ether — all emanating from one Lord. The elemental sameness underlines a shared Source.
Reflection Questions
  • When I notice differences in bodies, do I remember the shared elements?
  • What does that remembrance change?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.6

↗
वेदेन नामरूपाणि विषमाणि समेष्वपि । धातुषूद्धव कल्प्यन्त एतेषां स्वार्थसिद्धये ॥ ६ ॥
vedena nāma-rūpāṇi
[vedena naama-roopaani]
viṣamāṇi sameṣv api
[vishamaani sameshv api]
dhātuṣūddhava kalpyanta
[dhaatushooddhava kalpyanta]
eteṣāṁ svārtha-siddhaye
[eteshaam svaartha-siddhaye]
vedena — by Vedic literature nāma — names rūpāṇi — and forms viṣamāṇi — different sameṣu — which are equal api — indeed dhātuṣu — in (material bodies composed of) the five elements uddhava — My dear Uddhava kalpyante — are conceived of eteṣām — of them, the living entities sva-artha — of self-interest siddhaye — for the achievement.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vedena nāma-rūpāṇi
vedena
by Vedic literature
nāma
names
rūpāṇi
and forms
viṣamāṇi sameṣv api
viṣamāṇi
different
sameṣu
which are equal
api
indeed
dhātuṣūddhava kalpyanta
dhātuṣu
in (material bodies composed of) the five elements
uddhava
My dear Uddhava
kalpyante
are conceived of
eteṣāṁ svārtha-siddhaye
eteṣām
of them, the living entities
sva-artha
of self-interest
siddhaye
for the achievement.
My dear Uddhava, although all material bodies are composed of the same five elements and are thus equal, the Vedic literatures conceive of different names and forms in relation to such bodies so that the living entities may achieve their goal of life.

The words nāma-rūpāṇi viṣamāṇi refer to the system of varṇāśrama-dharma, in which members of human society are designated according to four social and four occupational divisions. Those dedicated to intellectual or religious perfection are called brāhmaṇas, those dedicated to political perfection are called kṣatriyas, those dedicated to financial perfection are called vaiśyas, and those dedicated to eating, sleeping, sex and honest work are called śūdras. Such propensities arise from the three modes of material nature (goodness, passion and ignorance), because the pure soul is not materially intellectual, ambitious for power, enterprising or servile. Rather, the pure soul is always absorbed in loving devotion to the Supreme Lord. If the various propensities of a conditioned soul are not engaged in the varṇāśrama system, they will certainly be misused, and thus that person will fall down from the standard of human life. The Vedic system is designed by the Lord so that conditioned souls may pursue their individual achievements and at the same time advance toward the ultimate goal of life, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Just as a doctor deals with a crazy man by speaking to him sympathetically in terms of his false conception of life, one who understands the Vedic literature engages the living entities according to their illusory identification with the elements of matter. Although all material bodies are composed of the same material elements and are thus qualitatively identical, as described here by the word sameṣu, the Vedic social system, varṇāśrama, is created to engage all human beings in Kṛṣṇa consciousness according to their various degrees of material identification. The absolute good is the Supreme Lord Himself, and that which approaches the Supreme Lord becomes similarly good. Because the sun is the source of heat within this world, an object that approaches the sun becomes hotter and hotter until it merges into fire. In the same manner, as we approach the transcendental nature of the Personality of Godhead, we automatically become surcharged with absolute goodness. Although this knowledge is the real basis of the Vedic literature, mundane piety is enjoined and sin is prohibited so that one can gradually come to the platform of material goodness, whereupon spiritual knowledge becomes visible.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Uddhava! Although all material bodies are composed of the same five elements and are thus equal, the Vedic literatures conceive of different names and forms in relation to such bodies so that the living entities may achieve their goal of life. In the bodies made of the same elements, different names and forms (words and objects they represent) are made, relating to varṇāśrama, such as brāhmaṇa, brahmacārī, betel nut seller, or oil man. The aim of making these names and forms is explained. They allow humans to attain goals in terms of dharma by restricting enjoying tendencies.
Bodies are made of the same elements but the Vedas give different names and forms for them so beings may achieve life's goal. Naming is purposeful, not arbitrary.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I confuse name and form with essence?
  • What is the goal these names are meant to serve?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.7

↗
देशकालादिभावानां वस्तूनां मम सत्तम । गुणदोषौ विधीयेते नियमार्थं हि कर्मणाम् ॥ ७ ॥
deśa-kālādi-bhāvānāṁ
[desha-kaalaadi-bhaavaanaam]
vastūnāṁ mama sattama
[vastoonaam mama sattama]
guṇa-doṣau vidhīyete
[guna-doshau vidheeyete]
niyamārthaṁ hi karmaṇām
[niyamaartham hi karmanaam]
deśa — of space kāla — time ādi — and so on bhāvānām — of such states of existence vastūnām — of things mama — by Me sat-tama — O most saintly Uddhava guṇa-doṣau — piety and sin vidhīyete — are established niyama-artham — for the restriction hi — certainly karmaṇām — of fruitive activities.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
deśa-kālādi-bhāvānāṁ
deśa
of space
kāla
time
ādi
and so on
bhāvānām
of such states of existence
vastūnāṁ mama sattama
vastūnām
of things
mama
by Me
sat-tama
O most saintly Uddhava
guṇa-doṣau vidhīyete
guṇa-doṣau
piety and sin
vidhīyete
are established
niyamārthaṁ hi karmaṇām
niyama-artham
for the restriction
hi
certainly
karmaṇām
of fruitive activities.
O saintly Uddhava, in order to restrict materialistic activities, I have established that which is proper and improper among all material things, including time, space and all physical objects.

The word niyamārtham (“in order to restrict”) is significant in this verse. A conditioned soul falsely identifies with his material senses and thus considers anything giving immediate satisfaction to the body to be good and anything inconvenient or disturbing to be bad. By higher intelligence, however, one recognizes long-term self-interest and danger. For example, medicine may be immediately bitter, but by calculating one’s long-term interest one accepts the bitter medicine to cure a disease that is not immediately troublesome but ultimately fatal. Similarly, Vedic literature restricts the sinful propensities of human beings by establishing what is proper and what is improper among all the objects and activities of the material world. Because everyone must eat, the Vedas prescribe foods in the mode of goodness and not those which are sinful, such as meat, fish and eggs. Similarly, one is advised to live in a peaceful and pious community and not in association with sinful persons, nor in an unclean or turbulent environment. By designating and restricting the exploitation of the material world, Vedic knowledge gradually brings a conditioned soul to the platform of material goodness. At that stage one becomes eligible to serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead and enter the transcendental stage of life. It should be remembered that such mere eligibility does not constitute actual qualification; without Kṛṣṇa consciousness mere mundane piety can never qualify a conditioned soul to go back home, back to Godhead. Within this world we are all infected by false pride, which must be diminished through submission to the Vedic injunctions. One who is completely engaged in the loving service of the Lord need not adopt these preliminary methods, for he directly contacts the Personality of Godhead through the spontaneous process of surrender. In the previous verse the Lord explained why Vedic literatures assign different values to the bodies of different living entities, and here the Lord explains the Vedic value system in regard to the material objects that interact with these bodies.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O saintly Uddhava! In order to restrict materialistic activities, I have established that which is proper and improper among all material things, space and time. Regulations apply not only to bodies, but to results and causes based on place and time. Objects (bhāvānām) as well as place and time are handled in terms of good and bad so that I limit material actions.
To restrict materialism, the Lord has established proper and improper among time, space, and physical objects. The point of categorization is restraint.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I treat all times and places as equally available for any activity?
  • What restraint would honor the Lord's categories?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.8

↗
अकृष्णसारो देशानामब्रह्मण्योऽशुचिर्भवेत् । कृष्णसारोऽप्यसौवीरकीकटासंस्कृतेरिणम् ॥ ८ ॥
akṛṣṇa-sāro deśānām
[akrishna-saaro deshaanaam]
abrahmaṇyo ’sucir bhavet
[abrahmanyo ’suchir bhavet]
kṛṣṇa-sāro ’py asauvīra-
[krishna-saaro ’py asauveera-]
kīkaṭāsaṁskṛteriṇam
[keekataasamskriterinam]
akṛṣṇa-sāraḥ — without spotted antelopes deśānām — among places abrahmaṇyaḥ — where there is no devotion to the brāhmaṇas aśuciḥ — contaminated bhavet — is kṛṣṇa-sāraḥ — possessing spotted antelopes api — even asauvīra — without saintly cultured men kīkaṭa — (a place of low-class men, such as) the state of Gayā asaṁskṛta — where people do not practice cleanliness or purificatory ceremonies īraṇam — where the land is barren.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
akṛṣṇa-sāro deśānām
akṛṣṇa-sāraḥ
without spotted antelopes
deśānām
among places
abrahmaṇyo ’sucir bhavet
abrahmaṇyaḥ
where there is no devotion to the brāhmaṇas
kṛṣṇa-sāro ’py asauvīra-
aśuciḥ
contaminated
bhavet
is
kīkaṭāsaṁskṛteriṇam
kṛṣṇa-sāraḥ
possessing spotted antelopes
api
even
asauvīra
without saintly cultured men
kīkaṭa
(a place of low-class men, such as) the state of Gayā
asaṁskṛta
where people do not practice cleanliness or purificatory ceremonies
īraṇam
where the land is barren.
Among places, those bereft of the spotted antelope, those devoid of devotion to the brāhmaṇas, those possessing spotted antelopes but bereft of respectable men, provinces like Kīkaṭa and places where cleanliness and purificatory rites are neglected, where meat-eaters are prominent or where the earth is barren, are all considered to be contaminated lands.

The word kṛṣṇa-sāra refers to the spotted antelope, whose hide is used by brahmacārīs while residing in the āśrama of the spiritual master. Brahmacārīs never hunt in the forest, but rather accept skins from those animals already deceased. The skin of the black or spotted antelope is also used as a garment by those receiving instruction in the execution of Vedic sacrifice. Therefore, since sacrifice cannot be properly performed in areas bereft of such creatures, these places are impure. Furthermore, although the inhabitants of a particular place may be expert in performing fruitive activities and ritualistic sacrifices, if they are inimical to the devotional service of the Lord, such a place is also polluted. Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura explains that previously the provinces of Bihar and Bengal were bereft of devotional service to the Lord and were considered impure. Then great Vaiṣṇavas such as Jayadeva appeared in these territories, converting them into holy places.

The word asauvīra indicates those places without suvīras, respectable saintly persons. Ordinarily, a person who obeys the state laws is considered a respectable citizen. In the same way, one who strictly obeys the law of God is considered to be a cultured or decent man, suvīra. The place where such intelligent persons reside is called sauvīram. Kīkaṭa refers to the modern state of Bihar, which traditionally has been known as a territory of uncivilized men. Even in such provinces, however, any place where saintly persons gather is considered to be holy. On the other hand, a province of generally respectable persons is immediately polluted by the presence of sinful men. Asaṁskṛta indicates lack of external cleanliness, as well as the absence of purificatory ceremonies for internal cleanliness. Śrīla Madhvācārya quotes from the Skanda Purāṇa as follows: “Religious persons should reside within an eight-mile radius of rivers, oceans, mountains, hermitages, forests, spiritual cities or places where the śālagrāma-śilā is found. All other places should be considered kīkaṭa, or contaminated. But if even in such contaminated places black and spotted antelopes are found, one may reside there as long as sinful persons are not also present. Even if sinful persons are present, if the civil power rests with respectable authorities, one may remain. Similarly, one may dwell wherever the Deity of Viṣṇu is duly installed and worshiped.”

The Lord here elaborates upon the theme of piety and sin, which are based on purity and impurity. Thus pure and contaminated places of residence are described here.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Among places, those bereft of the spotted antelope, those devoid of devotion to the brāhmaṇas, those possessing spotted antelopes but having unrespectable Kīkaṭas, unclean people or deserts are all considered to be impure. First pure and impure objects are described in eight verses. Among places, any place devoid of the spotted antelope is impure. A place where there are no persons respecting brāhmaṇas is most impure. Even if the place has spotted antelope, if there are dishonest Kīkaṭas, many persons who are unclean like mleechas of it the place has deserts, it is impure. A dvandva compound is used in the singular. Asauvīra means “a place of good men.” If the place is inhabited by Kīkaṭas who are not upright, it is impure. If the place has righteous Kīkatās it is pure.
Places lacking spotted antelopes, devotion to brāhmaṇas, respectable men, cleanliness, or where meat-eaters dominate are impure. Environments shape practice as surely as practice shapes us.
Reflection Questions
  • Which environment in my life most pulls me away from purity?
  • What small environmental change could I make?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.9

↗
कर्मण्यो गुणवान् कालो द्रव्यत: स्वत एव वा । यतो निवर्तते कर्म स दोषोऽकर्मक: स्मृत: ॥ ९ ॥
karmaṇyo guṇavān kālo
[karmanyo gunavaan kaalo]
dravyataḥ svata eva vā
[dravyatah svata eva vaa]
yato nivartate karma
[yato nivartate karma]
sa doṣo ’karmakaḥ smṛtaḥ
[sa dosho ’karmakah smritah]
karmaṇyaḥ — suitable for executing one’s prescribed duty guṇavān — pure kālaḥ — time dravyataḥ — by achievement of auspicious objects svataḥ — by its own nature eva — indeed vā — or yataḥ — due to which (time) nivartate — is impeded karma — one’s duty saḥ — this (time) doṣaḥ — impure akarmakaḥ — inappropriate for working properly smṛtaḥ — is considered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
karmaṇyo guṇavān kālo
karmaṇyaḥ
suitable for executing one’s prescribed duty
guṇavān
pure
kālaḥ
time
dravyataḥ svata eva vā
dravyataḥ
by achievement of auspicious objects
svataḥ
by its own nature
eva
indeed
vā
or
yato nivartate karma
yataḥ
due to which (time)
nivartate
is impeded
karma
one’s duty
sa doṣo ’karmakaḥ smṛtaḥ
saḥ
this (time)
doṣaḥ
impure
akarmakaḥ
inappropriate for working properly
smṛtaḥ
is considered.
A specific time is considered pure when it is appropriate, either by its own nature or through achievement of suitable paraphernalia, for the performance of one’s prescribed duty. That time which impedes the performance of one’s duty is considered impure.

Having discussed pure and impure places, the Lord now discusses different qualities of time. Certain times, such as the brāhma-muhūrta, the last few hours before sunrise, are always auspicious for spiritual advancement. Other times, not auspicious in themselves, become so by achievement of material prosperity that facilitates one’s mission in life.

Political, social or economic disturbances that obstruct the execution of one’s religious duties are considered inauspicious times. Similarly, a woman is considered contaminated just after childbirth or during her menstrual period. She cannot perform ordinary religious activities at such times, which are therefore inauspicious and impure. Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura explains that the most auspicious of all times is the moment one achieves the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If one neglects the loving service of the Lord, being carried away by sense gratification, he is certainly living in most inauspicious times. Therefore that moment in which one achieves the association of the Supreme Lord or the Lord’s pure devotee is the most auspicious time, whereas the moment of losing such association is most inauspicious. In other words, the perfection of life is simply Kṛṣṇa consciousness, by which one transcends the dualities of time and space caused by the three modes of material nature.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A specific time is considered pure when it is appropriate, either by its own nature or through achievement of suitable paraphernalia, for the performance of one’s prescribed duty. That time which impedes the performance of one’s duty is considered impure. Purity and impurity of time is shown. A time suitable for performance of karmas is pure. The time becomes suitable the moment materials are obtained. Some times are pure by nature such as forenoon. A time is impure which impedes action. For instance, after a child is born in a family the time is considered improper for performing rites.
Time is pure when appropriate, by its nature or by available paraphernalia, for prescribed duty; time that impedes duty is impure. The clock has moral character.
Reflection Questions
  • When is my time most pure, and when is it impeded?
  • How could I rearrange to put duty in pure time?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.10

↗
द्रव्यस्य शुद्ध्यशुद्धी च द्रव्येण वचनेन च । संस्कारेणाथ कालेन महत्वाल्पतयाथवा ॥ १० ॥
dravyasya śuddhy-aśuddhī ca
[dravyasya shuddhy-ashuddhee cha]
dravyeṇa vacanena ca
[dravyena vachanena cha]
saṁskāreṇātha kālena
[samskaarenaatha kaalena]
mahatvālpatayātha vā
[mahatvaalpatayaatha vaa]
dravyasya — of an object śuddhi — purity aśuddhī — or impurity ca — and dravyeṇa — by another object vacanena — by speech ca — and saṁskāreṇa — by ritual performance atha — or else kālena — by time mahatva-alpatayā — by greatness or smallness atha vā — or else.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dravyasya śuddhy-aśuddhī ca
dravyasya
of an object
śuddhi
purity
aśuddhī
or impurity
ca
and
dravyeṇa vacanena ca
dravyeṇa
by another object
vacanena
by speech
ca
and
saṁskāreṇātha kālena
saṁskāreṇa
by ritual performance
atha
or else
kālena
by time
mahatvālpatayātha vā
mahatva-alpatayā
by greatness or smallness
atha vā
or else.
An object’s purity or impurity is established by application of another object, by words, by rituals, by the effects of time or according to relative magnitude.

Cloth is purified by application of clean water and contaminated by application of urine. The words of a saintly brāhmaṇa are pure, but the sound vibration of a materialistic person is contaminated by lust and envy. A saintly devotee explains actual purity to others, whereas a nondevotee makes false propaganda that leads innocent people to commit polluted, sinful activities. Pure rituals are those meant for the satisfaction of the Supreme Lord, while materialistic ceremonies are those that lead their followers into materialistic and demoniac activities. The word saṁskāreṇa also indicates that the purity or impurity of a particular object is ascertained according to the regulations of ritualistic performances. For example, a flower to be offered to the Deity must be purified with water. Flowers or food cannot be offered to the Deity, however, if they have been contaminated by being smelled or tasted before the offering. The word kālena indicates that certain substances are purified by time and others contaminated by time. Rainwater, for example, is considered pure after ten days’ time, and after three days in cases of emergency. On the other hand, certain foods decay in time and thus become impure. Mahatva indicates that great bodies of water do not become contaminated, and alpatayā means that a small amount of water can easily become polluted or stagnant. In the same way, a great soul is not polluted by occasional contact with materialistic persons, whereas one whose devotion to God is very small is easily carried away and put into doubt by bad association. In terms of combination with other substances, and in terms of speech, ritual, time and magnitude, the purity and impurity of all objects can be ascertained.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura remarks that impure or decayed food is certainly forbidden for normal persons but is permissible for those who have no other means of subsistence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
An object’s purity or impurity is established by application of another object, by words, by cleaning, by the effects of time or according to size. “Objects, place and time” were mentioned in verse 7. Now impurity of objects is shown in four verses. Objects like plates are purified by water and made impure by urine or other impure items. Objects are made pure or impure by words. When there is a doubt, if a brāhmaṇa says the object is pure, it is pure. If he says it is impure, it is impure. Objects are purified cleaning, sprinkling with water etc. This is how flowers are purified. They are made impure by smelling them. New rain water becomes purified by waiting ten day’s time. The water is impure if not left for that time. Bodies of water used by outcastes are pure if they are large and impure if they are small.
An object's purity or impurity is established by application of another object, by words, by rituals, by time effects, or by relative magnitude. Purity is contextual and multiple-axis.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I think purity is one-dimensional when scripture treats it as multiple?
  • What new axis could I attend to?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.11

↗
शक्त्याशक्त्याथ वा बुद्ध्या समृद्ध्या च यदात्मने । अघं कुर्वन्ति हि यथा देशावस्थानुसारत: ॥ ११ ॥
śaktyāśaktyātha vā buddhyā
[shaktyaashaktyaatha vaa buddhyaa]
samṛddhyā ca yad ātmane
[samriddhyaa cha yad aatmane]
aghaṁ kurvanti hi yathā
[agham kurvanti hi yathaa]
deśāvasthānusārataḥ
[deshaavasthaanusaaratah]
śaktyā — by relative potency aśaktyā — impotence atha vā — or buddhyā — in terms of understanding samṛddhyā — opulence ca — and yat — which ātmane — to oneself agham — sinful reaction kurvanti — cause hi — indeed yathā — in actuality deśa — place avasthā — or one’s condition anusārataḥ — in accordance with.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaktyāśaktyātha vā buddhyā
śaktyā
by relative potency
aśaktyā
impotence
atha vā
or
buddhyā
in terms of understanding
samṛddhyā ca yad ātmane
samṛddhyā
opulence
ca
and
yat
which
ātmane
to oneself
aghaṁ kurvanti hi yathā
agham
sinful reaction
kurvanti
cause
hi
indeed
yathā
in actuality
deśāvasthānusārataḥ
deśa
place
avasthā
or one’s condition
anusārataḥ
in accordance with.
Impure things may or may not impose sinful reactions upon a person, depending on that person’s strength or weakness, intelligence, wealth, location and physical condition.

The Lord has described the purity and impurity of different places, times and material objects. According to the laws of nature, that which is impure contaminates a particular person in accordance with that person’s situation, as described here. For example, on certain occasions, such as a solar eclipse or just after childbirth, one must restrict the intake of food according to ritualistic injunctions. One who is physically weak, however, may eat without being considered impious. Ordinary persons consider the ten days following childbirth to be most auspicious, whereas one who is learned knows that this period is actually impure. Ignorance of the law does not save one from being punished, but one who consciously commits sinful activities is considered most fallen. Concerning opulence ( samṛddhi ), worn-out, dirty clothing or a messy residence are considered impure for a rich man but acceptable for one who is poor. The word deśa indicates that in a safe and peaceful place one is obligated to strictly perform religious rituals, whereas in a dangerous or chaotic situation one may be excused for occasional negligence of secondary principles. One who is physically healthy must offer obeisances to the Deities, attend religious functions and execute his prescribed duties, but a young child or sickly person may be excused from such activities, as indicated by the word avasthā. Ultimately, as Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī states:

anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam ānukūlyena kṛṣṇānu- śīlanaṁ bhaktir uttamā

“One should render transcendental loving service to the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa favorably and without desire for material profit or gain through fruitive activities or philosophical speculation. That is called pure devotional service.” ( Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.1.11) One should accept everything which is favorable for the devotional service of Lord Kṛṣṇa and reject whatever is unfavorable. One must learn the process of serving God from the bona fide spiritual master and thus always maintain one’s existence pure and free from anxiety. In general, however, when considering the relative purity and impurity of material things, all of the above-mentioned factors must be calculated.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Objects are also made pure or impure by strength, intelligence and wealth. These objects produce sin for the jīva under normal times and circumstance. Spoiled food is impure for those who have strength, but pure for those who do not have strength. By knowledge that impurity from birth of a son lasts ten days, there is purity. By knowledge that the impurity lasts less than that, there is impurity. A piece of worn out cloth is impurity for a person with wealth, but is pure for a poor person. These objects and words etc. create sin for the jīva according to normal place and physical condition. That means that the rules become effective in a safe place, not a place affected by thieves, when one is healthy, not sick, when one is youthful, not a baby or too old. deśaṁ kālaṁ tathātmānaṁ dravyaṁ dravya-prayojanam | upapattim avasthāṁ ca jñātvā śaucaṁ prakalpayet || Considiering the place, time, body, objects, use of the objects, suitability and circumstance, one should determine purity.
Impure things may or may not produce sin depending on the person's strength, intelligence, wealth, location, condition. The same encounter is not the same for every person.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I judged another's contact with the impure by my own standard?
  • How does this teaching reshape my judgments?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.12

↗
धान्यदार्वस्थितन्तूनां रसतैजसचर्मणाम् । कालवाय्वग्निमृत्तोयै: पार्थिवानां युतायुतै: ॥ १२ ॥
dhānya-dārv-asthi-tantūnāṁ
[dhaanya-daarv-asthi-tantoonaam]
rasa-taijasa-carmaṇām
[rasa-taijasa-charmanaam]
kāla-vāyv-agni-mṛt-toyaiḥ
[kaala-vaayv-agni-mrit-toyaih]
pārthivānāṁ yutāyutaiḥ
[paarthivaanaam yutaayutaih]
dhānya — of grains dāru — of wood (in the form of both ordinary objects and sacred utensils) asthi — bone (such as elephant tusks) tantūnām — and thread rasa — of liquids (oil, ghee, etc.) taijasa — fiery objects (gold, etc.) carmaṇām — and skins kāla — by time vāyu — by air agni — by fire mṛt — by earth toyaiḥ — and by water pārthivānām — (also) of earthen objects (such as chariot wheels, mud, pots, bricks, etc.) yuta — in combination ayutaiḥ — or separately.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dhānya-dārv-asthi-tantūnāṁ
dhānya
of grains
dāru
of wood (in the form of both ordinary objects and sacred utensils)
asthi
bone (such as elephant tusks)
tantūnām
and thread
rasa-taijasa-carmaṇām
rasa
of liquids (oil, ghee, etc.)
taijasa
fiery objects (gold, etc.)
carmaṇām
and skins
kāla-vāyv-agni-mṛt-toyaiḥ
kāla
by time
vāyu
by air
agni
by fire
mṛt
by earth
toyaiḥ
and by water
pārthivānāṁ yutāyutaiḥ
pārthivānām
(also) of earthen objects (such as chariot wheels, mud, pots, bricks, etc.)
yuta
in combination
ayutaiḥ
or separately.
Various objects such as grains, wooden utensils, things made of bone, thread, liquids, objects derived from fire, skins and earthy objects are all purified by time, by the wind, by fire, by earth and by water, either separately or in combination.

The word kāla, or “time,” is mentioned here, since all purificatory processes take place within time.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Various objects such as grains, wooden utensils, things made of bone, cloth, liquids, metals, skins and earthen objects are purified by time, by the wind, by fire, by earth and by water, either separately or in combination. It was said that objects could be purified by other objects. That is explained. Asthi means ivory etc. Rasa means oil and ghee. Taijasa means gold and other precious metals. Grains, wood, ivory, cloth, liquids like oil and ghee, precious metals, skins and earthen objects like pots and bricks become pure by time, wind, fire earth and water according to scriptural rules. These purifying agents may be used in combination or singly. Thus metals are purified by earth, water and fire as well. Wool cloth is purified by air alone.
Grains, wood utensils, bone objects, thread, liquids, fire-derived items, skins, and earthy objects are purified by time, wind, fire, earth, water — singly or combined. Even physical objects have purification protocols.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could basic cleanliness of objects be a small but real spiritual practice?
  • What single object would I begin with?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.13

↗
अमेध्यलिप्तं यद् येन गन्धलेपं व्यपोहति । भजते प्रकृतिं तस्य तच्छौचं तावदिष्यते ॥ १३ ॥
amedhya-liptaṁ yad yena
[amedhya-liptam yad yena]
gandha-lepaṁ vyapohati
[gandha-lepam vyapohati]
bhajate prakṛtiṁ tasya
[bhajate prakritim tasya]
tac chaucaṁ tāvad iṣyate
[tach chaucham taavad ishyate]
amedhya — by something impure liptam — touched yat — that thing which yena — by which gandha — the bad smell lepam — and the impure covering vyapohati — gives up bhajate — the contaminated object again assumes prakṛtim — its original nature tasya — of that object tat — that application śaucam — purification tāvat — to that extent iṣyate — is considered.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
amedhya-liptaṁ yad yena
amedhya
by something impure
liptam
touched
yat
that thing which
yena
by which
gandha-lepaṁ vyapohati
gandha
the bad smell
lepam
and the impure covering
vyapohati
gives up
bhajate prakṛtiṁ tasya
bhajate
the contaminated object again assumes
prakṛtim
its original nature
tasya
of that object
tac chaucaṁ tāvad iṣyate
tat
that application
śaucam
purification
tāvat
to that extent
iṣyate
is considered.
A particular purifying agent is considered appropriate when its application removes the bad odor or dirty covering of some contaminated object and makes it resume its original nature.

Furniture, kitchen utensils, clothing and other objects are purified by application of abrasion, alkali, acid, water and so on. One thereby removes the bad fragrance or impure coating of such objects, restoring them to their original clean appearance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
An object is considered pure when it gives up contamination and bad smell by applying suitable purifying agents and returns to its original state. If a seat, cloth or vessel is contaminated by an impure item, it gives up the contamination and smell by water, earth, acids, soap, and scraping. It is then restored to its original nature. That is its purity. One should measure the purification from the extent that the contamination by smell is removed by scraping or other means.
A purifying agent is right when its application removes bad odor or covering, restoring the object's original nature. Restoration of original nature is the test.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life needs restoration to original nature, not merely improvement?
  • What agent serves that restoration?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.14

↗
स्‍नानदानतपोऽवस्थावीर्यसंस्कारकर्मभि: । मत्स्मृत्या चात्मन: शौचं शुद्ध: कर्माचरेद्‌द्विज: ॥ १४ ॥
snāna-dāna-tapo-’vasthā-
[snaana-daana-tapo-’vasthaa-]
vīrya-saṁskāra-karmabhiḥ
[veerya-samskaara-karmabhih]
mat-smṛtyā cātmanaḥ śaucaṁ
[mat-smrityaa chaatmanah shaucham]
śuddhaḥ karmācared dvijaḥ
[shuddhah karmaachared dvijah]
snāna — by bathing dāna — charity tapaḥ — austerity avasthā — by virtue of one’s age vīrya — potency saṁskāra — execution of ritual purification karmabhiḥ — and prescribed duties mat-smṛtyā — by remembrance of Me ca — also ātmanaḥ — of the self śaucam — cleanliness śuddhaḥ — pure karma — activity ācaret — he should perform dvijaḥ — a twice-born man.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
snāna-dāna-tapo-’vasthā-
snāna
by bathing
dāna
charity
tapaḥ
austerity
avasthā
by virtue of one’s age
vīrya-saṁskāra-karmabhiḥ
vīrya
potency
saṁskāra
execution of ritual purification
karmabhiḥ
and prescribed duties
mat-smṛtyā cātmanaḥ śaucaṁ
mat-smṛtyā
by remembrance of Me
ca
also
ātmanaḥ
of the self
śaucam
cleanliness
śuddhaḥ karmācared dvijaḥ
śuddhaḥ
pure
karma
activity
ācaret
he should perform
dvijaḥ
a twice-born man.
The self can be cleansed by bathing, charity, austerity, age, personal strength, purificatory rituals, prescribed duties and, above all, by remembrance of Me. The brāhmaṇa and other twice-born men should be duly purified before performing their specific activities.

The word avasthā indicates that when boys and girls are young they are kept pure by youthful innocence and that as they grow up they are kept pure through proper education and engagement. By one’s individual potency one should avoid sinful activities and the association of those inclined toward sense gratification. The word karma here refers to prescribed duties, such as worshiping the spiritual master and the Deity, chanting the Gāyatrī mantra three times daily and accepting spiritual initiation. The prescribed duties of the varṇāśrama system automatically purify one from the covering of false ego by dovetailing one’s bodily designation in appropriate religious activities. There are specific duties for brāhmaṇas, kṣatriyas, vaiśyas, śūdras, brahmacārīs, gṛhasthas, vānaprasthas and sannyāsīs, as described previously in this canto by the Lord Himself. The most significant word here is mat-smṛtyā (“by remembrance of Me”). Ultimately, one cannot avoid the infection of illusion through any process except Kṛṣṇa consciousness. The three modes of nature perpetually interact, and one must sometimes fall into the mode of ignorance and sometimes rise to the mode of goodness, uselessly rotating within the kingdom of illusion. But by Kṛṣṇa consciousness, remembrance of the Personality of Godhead, one can actually uproot one’s tendency to act against the will of the Absolute Truth. Then one becomes freed from the clutches of māyā and goes back home, back to Godhead. As stated in the Garuḍa Purāṇa:

apavitraḥ pavitro vā sarvāvasthāṁ gato ’pi vā yaḥ smaret puṇḍarīkākṣaṁ sa bāhyābhyantare śuciḥ

“Whether one is pure or contaminated, and regardless of one’s external situation, simply by remembering the lotus-eyed Personality of Godhead one can internally and externally cleanse one’s existence.”

Lord Caitanya recommended that we constantly remember the Supreme Lord by chanting His holy names, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. This sublime process is essential for every human actually desirous of purifying his existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The self can be cleansed by bathing, charity, austerity, age, conduct, purification rituals, prescribed duties and, above all, by remembrance of me. The brāhmaṇa and others should be duly purified before performing their specific activities. Purification of objects has been described. Now purification of the person who purifies objects is described. Purification of the performer with his bodily identity takes place by bathing, charity, austerity, old age (avasthā), conduct according to capability (vīrya), saṁskāras like upanayana, and rites such as sandhya worship. The aim is stated. A pure person performs his duties. The dvija is mentioned but this applies to śūdras as well.
The self is cleansed by bathing, charity, austerity, age, strength, rituals, prescribed duties, and above all by remembrance of Me. Many cleansers — but one prime.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of these am I using and which neglecting?
  • Is remembrance actually leading my cleansing or is it last?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.15

↗
मन्त्रस्य च परिज्ञानं कर्मशुद्धिर्मदर्पणम् । धर्म: सम्पद्यते षड्‌भिरधर्मस्तु विपर्यय: ॥ १५ ॥
mantrasya ca parijñānaṁ
[mantrasya cha parijnaanam]
karma-śuddhir mad-arpaṇam
[karma-shuddhir mad-arpanam]
dharmaḥ sampadyate ṣaḍbhir
[dharmah sampadyate shadbhir]
adharmas tu viparyayaḥ
[adharmas tu viparyayah]
mantrasya — (the purification) of a mantra ca — and parijñānam — correct knowledge karma — of work śuddhiḥ — the purification mat-arpaṇam — offering unto Me dharmaḥ — religiousness sampadyate — is achieved ṣaḍbhiḥ — by the six (purification of place, time, substance, the doer, the mantras and the work) adharmaḥ — irreligiosity tu — but viparyayaḥ — otherwise.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mantrasya ca parijñānaṁ
mantrasya
(the purification) of a mantra
ca
and
parijñānam
correct knowledge
karma-śuddhir mad-arpaṇam
karma
of work
śuddhiḥ
the purification
mat-arpaṇam
offering unto Me
dharmaḥ sampadyate ṣaḍbhir
dharmaḥ
religiousness
sampadyate
is achieved
ṣaḍbhiḥ
by the six (purification of place, time, substance, the doer, the mantras and the work)
adharmas tu viparyayaḥ
adharmaḥ
irreligiosity
tu
but
viparyayaḥ
otherwise.
A mantra is purified when chanted with proper knowledge, and one’s work is purified when offered to Me. Thus by purification of the place, time, substance, doer, mantras and work, one becomes religious, and by negligence of these six items one is considered irreligious.

One receives a mantra from the mouth of a bona fide spiritual master, who instructs the disciple in the method, meaning and ultimate purpose of the mantra. The bona fide spiritual master in this age gives his disciple the mahā-mantra, or holy names of God, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. One who chants this mantra, considering himself to be the eternal servant of the Lord, gradually learns to chant offenselessly and by such purified chanting quickly achieves the highest perfection of life. The Lord here summarizes His discussion of purity and impurity, which manifest ultimately in religious and irreligious life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A mantra is purified when chanted with proper knowledge, and one’s work is purified when offered to me. Thus by purification of the place, time, substance, doer, mantras and work, dharma is accomplished, and by negligence of these six items adharma appears. Purification of mantra is described. Suitable knowledge from the mouth of the pure guru purifies a mantra. Action is purified by offering it to the Lord. If not offered, it is impure. By purity of these six items one should conduct oneself in life. After showing purity and impurity, everything is summarized. By the purity of six items—place, time, objects, performer, mantra and action—dharma is accomplished. When there is impurity of these items, it is a cause of adharma.
Mantra is purified by proper knowledge, work by offering to the Lord; purifying place, time, substance, doer, mantras, work yields religion. Six axes of purification compose one life.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of the six is weakest in my own practice?
  • What small adjustment would shift it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.16

↗
क्व‍‍चिद् गुणोऽपि दोष: स्याद् दोषोऽपि विधिना गुण: । गुणदोषार्थनियमस्तद्भ‍िदामेव बाधते ॥ १६ ॥
kvacid guṇo ’pi doṣaḥ syād
[kvachid guno ’pi doshah syaad]
doṣo ’pi vidhinā guṇaḥ
[dosho ’pi vidhinaa gunah]
guṇa-doṣārtha-niyamas
[guna-doshaartha-niyamas]
tad-bhidām eva bādhate
[tad-bhidaam eva baadhate]
kvacit — sometimes guṇaḥ — piety api — even doṣaḥ — sin syāt — becomes doṣaḥ — sin api — also vidhinā — on the strength of Vedic injunction guṇaḥ — piety guṇa-doṣa — to piety and sin artha — regarding niyamaḥ — restrictive regulation tat — of them bhidām — the distinction eva — actually bādhate — undoes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kvacid guṇo ’pi doṣaḥ syād
kvacit
sometimes
guṇaḥ
piety
api
even
doṣaḥ
sin
syāt
becomes
doṣo ’pi vidhinā guṇaḥ
doṣaḥ
sin
api
also
vidhinā
on the strength of Vedic injunction
guṇaḥ
piety
guṇa-doṣārtha-niyamas
guṇa-doṣa
to piety and sin
artha
regarding
niyamaḥ
restrictive regulation
tad-bhidām eva bādhate
tat
of them
bhidām
the distinction
eva
actually
bādhate
undoes.
Sometimes piety becomes sin, and sometimes what is ordinarily sin becomes piety on the strength of Vedic injunctions. Such special rules in effect eradicate the clear distinction between piety and sin.

The Lord clearly explains here that material piety and sin are always relative considerations. For example, if a neighbor’s house is on fire and one chops a hole in the roof so that the trapped family may escape, one is considered to be a pious hero because of the dangerous condition. In normal conditions, however, if one chops a hole in his neighbor’s roof or breaks the neighbor’s windows, he is considered a criminal. Similarly, one who abandons one’s wife and children is certainly irresponsible and thoughtless. If one takes sannyāsa, however, and remains fixed on a higher spiritual platform, he is considered to be a most saintly person. Piety and sin therefore depend upon particular circumstances and are at times difficult to distinguish.

According to Śrīla Madhvācārya, persons above the age of fourteen are considered capable of distinguishing between good and bad and are thus responsible for their pious and sinful activities. Animals, on the other hand, being merged in ignorance, cannot be blamed for their offenses or praised for their so-called good qualities, which all arise ultimately from ignorance. Human beings who act like animals, with the idea that one should not feel any guilt but should do whatever one likes, will certainly take birth as animals absorbed in ignorance. And there are other foolish people who, observing the relativity of material piety and sin, conclude that there is no absolute good. It should be understood, however, that Kṛṣṇa consciousness is absolutely good because it involves complete obedience to the Absolute Truth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, whose goodness is eternal and absolute. Those who are inclined to study material piety and sin ultimately experience frustration due to the relativity and variability of the subject matter. One should therefore come to the transcendental platform of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which is valid and perfect in all circumstances.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sometimes good becomes bad, and sometimes bad becomes good on the strength of Vedic injunctions. The rules for good and bad themselves eradicate the clear distinction between good and bad. This division of good and bad is not always fixed. During calamity, hoarding is a good quality, but during normal times it is a bad quality since it is forbidden. Though giving up one’s family is a fault, by following the rules for detachment, it is a good quality. Therefore the very rules for these two objects, good and bad, destroy the distinction of good and bad. The rule which says it is wrong to give up one’s family also negates the fault for a particular qualified person, since it is a good quality for the jñānī to give up his family. The rule that says it is good to give up one’s family also negates that good quality for the karmī, since it is wrong for the karṁī to give up his family. Thus good and bad are not fixed universally, but are determined according to particular circumstances.
Sometimes piety becomes sin and sin becomes piety by Vedic injunction — special rules can override clear distinctions. The world is subtler than fixed lists.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I refuse to apply situational discernment because of a generic rule?
  • Where do I bend a rule when I should not?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.17

↗
समानकर्माचरणं पतितानां न पातकम् । औत्पत्तिको गुण: सङ्गो न शयान: पतत्यध: ॥ १७ ॥
samāna-karmācaraṇaṁ
[samaana-karmaacharanam]
patitānāṁ na pātakam
[patitaanaam na paatakam]
autpattiko guṇaḥ saṅgo
[autpattiko gunah sango]
na śayānaḥ pataty adhaḥ
[na shayaanah pataty adhah]
samāna — equal karma — of work ācaraṇam — the performance patitānām — for those who are fallen na — is not pātakam — a cause of falldown autpattikaḥ — dictated by one’s nature guṇaḥ — becomes a good quality saṅgaḥ — material association na — does not śayānaḥ — one who is lying down patati — fall adhaḥ — further down.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
samāna-karmācaraṇaṁ
samāna
equal
karma
of work
ācaraṇam
the performance
patitānāṁ na pātakam
patitānām
for those who are fallen
na
is not
pātakam
a cause of falldown
autpattiko guṇaḥ saṅgo
autpattikaḥ
dictated by one’s nature
guṇaḥ
becomes a good quality
saṅgaḥ
material association
na śayānaḥ pataty adhaḥ
na
does not
śayānaḥ
one who is lying down
patati
fall
adhaḥ
further down.
The same activities that would degrade an elevated person do not cause falldown for those who are already fallen. Indeed, one who is lying on the ground cannot possibly fall further. The material association that is dictated by one’s own nature is considered a good quality.

The Lord here further describes the ambiguity in ascertaining material piety and sin. Although intimate association with women is most abominable for a renounced sannyāsī, the same association is pious for a householder, who is ordered by Vedic injunction to approach his wife at the suitable time for procreation. Similarly, a brāhmaṇa who drinks liquor is considered to be committing a most abominable act, whereas a śūdra, a low-class man, who can moderate his drinking is considered to be self-controlled. Piety and sin on the material level are thus relative considerations. Any member of society, however, who receives dīkṣā, initiation into the chanting of the Lord’s holy names, must strictly obey the four regulative principles: no eating of meat, fish or eggs, no illicit sex, no intoxication and no gambling. A spiritually initiated person neglecting these principles will certainly fall from his elevated position of liberation.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The same activities that would degrade an elevated person do not cause falldown for those who are already fallen. Association with women is bad for the sannyāsī, but is a good quality for a householder. One who is lying on the ground cannot possibly fall further. The irregularity of rules is described. The activity (such as drinking wine) for a person who is not fallen is a cause of fall down but the same activity for the fallen person does not cause him to fall since he is already fallen. Association with women is a fault for the sannyāsī but association with his wife during her fertile period is a good the householder since that is natural. It is a fault for a person qualified for household life not to associate with his wife. An example is given for both these conditions. A person who is lying down cannot fall down.
Activities that would degrade the elevated do not cause falldown for those already fallen — one on the ground cannot fall further. The Lord acknowledges variable responsibility.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I holding others to standards their condition does not yet permit?
  • What does compassion do with this teaching?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.18

↗
यतो यतो निवर्तेत विमुच्येत ततस्तत: । एष धर्मो नृणां क्षेम: शोकमोहभयापह: ॥ १८ ॥
yato yato nivarteta
[yato yato nivarteta]
vimucyeta tatas tataḥ
[vimuchyeta tatas tatah]
eṣa dharmo nṛṇāṁ kṣemaḥ
[esha dharmo nrinaam kshemah]
śoka-moha-bhayāpahaḥ
[shoka-moha-bhayaapahah]
yataḥ yataḥ — from whatever nivarteta — one desists vimucyeta — he becomes liberated tataḥ tataḥ — from that eṣaḥ — this dharmaḥ — the system of religion nṛṇām — for humans kṣemaḥ — the path of auspiciousness śoka — suffering moha — delusion bhaya — and fear apahaḥ — which takes away.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yato yato nivarteta
yataḥ yataḥ
from whatever
nivarteta
one desists
vimucyeta tatas tataḥ
vimucyeta
he becomes liberated
tataḥ tataḥ
from that
eṣa dharmo nṛṇāṁ kṣemaḥ
eṣaḥ
this
dharmaḥ
the system of religion
nṛṇām
for humans
kṣemaḥ
the path of auspiciousness
śoka-moha-bhayāpahaḥ
śoka
suffering
moha
delusion
bhaya
and fear
apahaḥ
which takes away.
By refraining from a particular sinful or materialistic activity, one becomes freed from its bondage. Such renunciation is the basis of religious and auspicious life for human beings and drives away all suffering, illusion and fear.

In Caitanya-caritāmṛta ( Antya 6.220) it is stated:

mahāprabhura bhakta-gaṇera vairāgya pradhāna yāhā dekhi’ prīta hana gaura-bhagavān

“Renunciation is the basic principle sustaining the lives of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s devotees. Seeing this renunciation, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is extremely satisfied.”

Because of false ego one considers oneself to be the proprietor and enjoyer of one’s activities. Actually, Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead, is the proprietor and enjoyer of our activities; recognition of this fact in Kṛṣṇa consciousness leads one to real renunciation. Every human being should perform his prescribed duty as an offering to the Supreme Lord. Then there will be no possibility of material entanglement. Lord Kṛṣṇa clearly explains in Bhagavad-gītā that prescribed duties performed as an offering to the Lord award liberation from material bondage. Sinful activities cannot be offered to the Lord but must be given up altogether. In effect, the distinction between piety and sin is made so that the living entities will become pious and eligible to surrender to the Supreme Lord. As explained in Bhagavad-gītā (7.28) :

yeṣāṁ tv anta-gataṁ pāpaṁ janānāṁ puṇya-karmaṇām te dvandva-moha-nirmuktā bhajante māṁ dṛḍha-vratāḥ

“Persons who have acted piously in previous lives and in this life, whose sinful actions are completely eradicated and who are freed from the duality of delusion, engage themselves in My service with determination.”

By thorough piety one’s life becomes auspicious and freed from lamentation, illusion and fear, and one can then take to the path of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One becomes freed from whatever actions one refrains. This principle brings liberation for the human and frees him from suffering, illusion and fear. The purport of all rules concerning good and bad is detachment by restricting the tendency to enjoy.
Refraining from sinful or materialistic activity frees one from its bondage; such renunciation is the basis of religious life and drives away suffering, illusion, fear. Simple subtraction is powerful.
Reflection Questions
  • Which one activity, if subtracted, would shift my whole life?
  • What stops me from subtracting it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.19

↗
विषयेषु गुणाध्यासात् पुंस: सङ्गस्ततो भवेत् । सङ्गात्तत्र भवेत् काम: कामादेव कलिर्नृणाम् ॥ १९ ॥
viṣayeṣu guṇādhyāsāt
[vishayeshu gunaadhyaasaat]
puṁsaḥ saṅgas tato bhavet
[pumsah sangas tato bhavet]
saṅgāt tatra bhavet kāmaḥ
[sangaat tatra bhavet kaamah]
kāmād eva kalir nṛṇām
[kaamaad eva kalir nrinaam]
viṣayeṣu — in material objects of sense gratification guṇa-adhyāsāt — because of presuming them to be good puṁsaḥ — of a person saṅgaḥ — attachment tataḥ — from that presumption bhavet — comes into being saṅgāt — from that material association tatra — thus bhavet — arises kāmaḥ — lust kāmāt — from lust eva — also kaliḥ — quarrel nṛṇām — among men.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣayeṣu guṇādhyāsāt
viṣayeṣu
in material objects of sense gratification
guṇa-adhyāsāt
because of presuming them to be good
puṁsaḥ saṅgas tato bhavet
puṁsaḥ
of a person
saṅgaḥ
attachment
tataḥ
from that presumption
bhavet
comes into being
saṅgāt tatra bhavet kāmaḥ
saṅgāt
from that material association
tatra
thus
bhavet
arises
kāmaḥ
lust
kāmād eva kalir nṛṇām
kāmāt
from lust
eva
also
kaliḥ
quarrel
nṛṇām
among men.
One who accepts material sense objects as desirable certainly becomes attached to them. From such attachment lust arises, and this lust creates quarrel among men.

The actual goal of human life should not be material sense gratification, for it is the basis of conflict in human society. Although the Vedic literature sometimes sanctions sense gratification, the ultimate purpose of the Vedas is renunciation, since Vedic culture cannot possibly recommend anything that disturbs human life. A lusty person is easily angered and becomes inimical to anyone frustrating his lusty desires. Since his sex desire can never be satisfied, a lusty person ultimately becomes frustrated with his own sex partner, and thus a “love-hate” relationship develops. A lusty person considers himself to be the enjoyer of God’s creation and is therefore full of pride and false prestige. The lusty, proud person will not be attracted to the process of humble submission at the lotus feet of the bona fide spiritual master. Attraction to illicit sex is thus the direct enemy of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, which depends upon humble submission to the representative of the Supreme Lord. Lord Kṛṣṇa also states in Bhagavad-gītā that desire for illicit sex is the all-devouring, sinful enemy of this world.

Because modern society sanctions unrestricted mixing of men and women, its citizens cannot possibly achieve peace; rather, the regulation of conflict becomes the basis of social survival. This is the symptom of an ignorant society falsely accepting the material body as the highest good, as described here by the words viṣayeṣu guṇādhyāsāt. One who is too affectionate to his own body will inevitably be seized by sex desire.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
One becomes attached because of thinking that an object is good. From that attachment desire arises. From desire quarrel arises. The path of enjoyment is shown to be the cause of great obstacles in order to defeat persons absorbed in the path of enjoyment mentioned in the Vedas. This is explained in four verses. Men become attached because of thinking that certain objects are good. From that attachment desire arises. From desire arises quarrel with persons who oppose one’s desires.
Treating sense objects as desirable produces attachment; attachment produces lust; lust produces quarrel. The chain is short and predictable.
Reflection Questions
  • Where can I see the chain forming in my own life right now?
  • What single intervention breaks the chain earliest?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.20

↗
कलेर्दुर्विषह: क्रोधस्तमस्तमनुवर्तते । तमसा ग्रस्यते पुंसश्चेतना व्यापिनी द्रुतम् ॥ २० ॥
kaler durviṣahaḥ krodhas
[kaler durvishahah krodhas]
tamas tam anuvartate
[tamas tam anuvartate]
tamasā grasyate puṁsaś
[tamasaa grasyate pumsash]
cetanā vyāpinī drutam
[chetanaa vyaapinee drutam]
kaleḥ — from quarrel durviṣahaḥ — intolerable krodhaḥ — anger tamaḥ — ignorance tam — that anger anuvartate — follows tamasā — by ignorance grasyate — is seized puṁsaḥ — of a man cetanā — the consciousness vyāpinī — broad drutam — swiftly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kaler durviṣahaḥ krodhas
kaleḥ
from quarrel
durviṣahaḥ
intolerable
krodhaḥ
anger
tamas tam anuvartate
tamaḥ
ignorance
tam
that anger
anuvartate
follows
tamasā grasyate puṁsaś
tamasā
by ignorance
grasyate
is seized
puṁsaḥ
of a man
cetanā vyāpinī drutam
cetanā
the consciousness
vyāpinī
broad
drutam
swiftly.
From quarrel arises intolerable anger, followed by the darkness of ignorance. This ignorance quickly overtakes a man’s broad intelligence.

The desire for material association arises from one’s propensity to deny that everything is God’s energy. Falsely imagining material sense objects to be separate from the Supreme Lord, one desires to enjoy them; such desire gives rise to conflict and quarrel in human society. This conflict inevitably gives rise to great anger, which makes human beings become foolish and destructive. Thus the actual goal of human life is quickly forgotten.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From quarrel arises intolerable anger, followed by illusion. By this illusion, remembrance of what to do and not to do is quickly destroyed. Following anger is illusion (tamaḥ). By that, memory (cetanā) of what to do and what not to do is quickly destroyed.
Quarrel produces intolerable anger, anger produces ignorance, and ignorance overtakes intelligence. The descent is rapid once started.
Reflection Questions
  • When was I last in 'intolerable anger', and what came next?
  • What practice catches anger before it darkens intelligence?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.21

↗
तया विरहित: साधो जन्तु: शून्याय कल्पते । ततोऽस्य स्वार्थविभ्रंशो मूर्च्छितस्य मृतस्य च ॥ २१ ॥
tayā virahitaḥ sādho
[tayaa virahitah saadho]
jantuḥ śūnyāya kalpate
[jantuh shoonyaaya kalpate]
tato ’sya svārtha-vibhraṁśo
[tato ’sya svaartha-vibhramsho]
mūrcchitasya mṛtasya ca
[moorchchitasya mritasya cha]
tayā — of that intelligence virahitaḥ — deprived sādho — O saintly Uddhava jantuḥ — a living creature śūnyāya — practically void kalpate — becomes tataḥ — consequently asya — his sva-artha — from the goals of life vibhraṁśaḥ — downfall mūrcchitasya — of him who has become like dull matter mṛtasya — virtually dead ca — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayā virahitaḥ sādho
tayā
of that intelligence
virahitaḥ
deprived
sādho
O saintly Uddhava
jantuḥ śūnyāya kalpate
jantuḥ
a living creature
śūnyāya
practically void
kalpate
becomes
tato ’sya svārtha-vibhraṁśo
tataḥ
consequently
asya
his
sva-artha
from the goals of life
vibhraṁśaḥ
downfall
mūrcchitasya mṛtasya ca
mūrcchitasya
of him who has become like dull matter
mṛtasya
virtually dead
ca
and.
O saintly Uddhava, a person bereft of real intelligence is considered to have lost everything. Deviated from the actual purpose of his life, he becomes dull, just like a dead person.

Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so vital and essential that one who has deviated from this progressive path of self-realization is considered to be virtually unconscious, or like a dead person. Since every living entity is part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa, anyone who falsely identifies with the external body is actually unconscious of his real position. Thus it is stated, śūnyāya kalpate: pursuing that which has no factual existence, he is devoid of any tangible progress or benefit in life. One whose consciousness is absorbed in the nonexistent becomes himself practically nonexistent. In this way, the eternal living entities become fallen, lost in the ocean of material existence, and it is only by the special mercy of the pure devotees of the Lord that they can be rescued. The Lord’s devotees therefore instruct the fallen people to chant Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. By this process our real consciousness and life can be quickly revived.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O saintly Uddhava! A person bereft of his memory is considered to have lost everything. Like a person who has fainted or is dead, he has deviated from his goal. Like a person who has fainted or a dead person, he fails to achieve his goals.
A person bereft of real intelligence has lost everything — deviated from life's purpose, dull as a dead person. The teaching is stark.
Reflection Questions
  • What signs would tell me I am dulling?
  • What could brighten intelligence today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.22

↗
विषयाभिनिवेशेन नात्मानं वेद नापरम् । वृक्षजीविकया जीवन् व्यर्थं भस्त्र‍ोव य: श्वसन् ॥ २२ ॥
viṣayābhiniveśena
[vishayaabhiniveshena]
nātmānaṁ veda nāparam
[naatmaanam veda naaparam]
vṛkṣa jīvikayā jīvan
[vriksha jeevikayaa jeevan]
vyarthaṁ bhastreva yaḥ śvasan
[vyartham bhastreva yah shvasan]
viṣaya — in sense gratification abhiniveśena — by overabsorption na — not ātmānam — himself veda — knows na — nor aparam — another vṛkṣa — of a tree jīvakayā — by the lifestyle jīvan — living vyartham — in vain bhastrā iva — just like a bellows yaḥ — who śvasan — is breathing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣayābhiniveśena
viṣaya
in sense gratification
abhiniveśena
by overabsorption
nātmānaṁ veda nāparam
na
not
ātmānam
himself
veda
knows
na
nor
aparam
another
vṛkṣa jīvikayā jīvan
vṛkṣa
of a tree
jīvakayā
by the lifestyle
jīvan
living
vyarthaṁ bhastreva yaḥ śvasan
vyartham
in vain
bhastrā iva
just like a bellows
yaḥ
who
śvasan
is breathing.
Because of absorption in sense gratification, one cannot recognize himself or others. Living uselessly in ignorance like a tree, one is merely breathing just like a bellows.

Just as trees, having no means of defending themselves, are always being cut down, similarly, the conditioned souls are constantly being cut down by the cruel laws of nature, which impose innumerable miseries culminating in sudden death. Although foolish people think they are helping themselves and others, they actually do not know their own identity, nor the identities of their so-called friends and relatives. Absorbed in gratifying the senses of the external body, they spend their lives uselessly, without spiritual profit. This useless lifestyle can be transformed into a perfect life simply by chanting the holy names of God in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, as recommended by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of absorption in sense gratification, one cannot recognize himself or others. He maintains his life senselessly like a tree, breathing just like a bellows. He maintains his life like a tree, which takes only water. In this way he is like a person who has fainted. He breathes like a bellows. In this way he is similar to a dead man.
Absorbed in sense gratification, one cannot recognize self or others, living like a tree, breathing like a bellows. The teaching describes complete spiritual unconsciousness.
Reflection Questions
  • What part of my life resembles 'breathing like a bellows'?
  • What would waking up there involve?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.23

↗
फलश्रुतिरियं नृणां न श्रेयो रोचनं परम् । श्रेयोविवक्षया प्रोक्तं यथा भैषज्यरोचनम् ॥ २३ ॥
phala-śrutir iyaṁ nṝṇāṁ
[phala-shrutir iyam nreenaam]
na śreyo rocanaṁ param
[na shreyo rochanam param]
śreyo-vivakṣayā proktaṁ
[shreyo-vivakshayaa proktam]
yathā bhaiṣajya-rocanam
[yathaa bhaishajya-rochanam]
phala-śrutiḥ — the statements of scripture promising rewards iyam — these nṝṇām — for men na — are not śreyaḥ — the highest good rocanam — enticement param — merely śreyaḥ — the ultimate good vivakṣayā — with the idea of saying proktam — spoken yathā — just as bhaiṣajya — for taking medicine rocanam — inducement.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
phala-śrutir iyaṁ nṝṇāṁ
phala-śrutiḥ
the statements of scripture promising rewards
iyam
these
nṝṇām
for men
na śreyo rocanaṁ param
na
are not
śreyaḥ
the highest good
rocanam
enticement
param
merely
śreyo-vivakṣayā proktaṁ
śreyaḥ
the ultimate good
vivakṣayā
with the idea of saying
proktam
spoken
yathā bhaiṣajya-rocanam
yathā
just as
bhaiṣajya
for taking medicine
rocanam
inducement.
Those statements of scripture promising fruitive rewards do not prescribe the ultimate good for men but are merely enticements for executing beneficial religious duties, like promises of candy spoken to induce a child to take beneficial medicine.

In the previous verse Lord Kṛṣṇa stated that persons absorbed in sense gratification certainly deviate from the real purpose of human life. But since the Vedas themselves promise heavenly sense gratification as the result of sacrifice and austerity, how can such promotion to heaven be considered a deviation from the goal of life? The Lord here explains that the fruitive rewards offered in religious scriptures are merely inducements, like candy that is used to induce a child to take medicine. It is actually the medicine that is beneficial, and not the candy. Similarly, in fruitive sacrifices it is the worship of Lord Viṣṇu that is beneficial, not the fruitive reward itself. According to Bhagavad-gītā, those professing fruitive rewards to be the ultimate goal of religious scripture are certainly less intelligent fools inimical to the purpose of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord desires that all conditioned souls be purified and come back home, back to Godhead, for an eternal life of bliss and knowledge. One who opposes the Lord’s purpose in the name of religiosity is certainly bewildered about the purpose of life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The rewards promised in scripture are not the ultimate benefit for man but are merely enticements for liberating him. They are like promises of candy spoken to induce a child to take beneficial medicine. “How can one deviate from one’s interest by hearing results like Svarga in the Vedas?” The results described in the scriptures for performing karmas are not beneficial for man. Nārada says: śreyas tvaṁ katamad rājan karmaṇātmana īhase duḥkha-hāniḥ sukhāvāptiḥ śreyas tan neha ceṣyate O King! What benefit do you want for yourself by doing these karmas? It is not possible to destroy suffering and attain happiness by performance of karma.
Scriptures' promises of fruitive rewards are not the ultimate good — they are like candy spoken to make a child take medicine. The candy is real; the medicine is the point.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'candy' in scripture have I treated as the medicine?
  • What is the medicine I should actually be taking?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.24

↗
उत्पत्त्यैव हि कामेषु प्राणेषु स्वजनेषु च । आसक्तमनसो मर्त्या आत्मनोऽनर्थहेतुषु ॥ २४ ॥
utpattyaiva hi kāmeṣu
[utpattyaiva hi kaameshu]
prāṇeṣu sva-janeṣu ca
[praaneshu sva-janeshu cha]
āsakta-manaso martyā
[aasakta-manaso martyaa]
ātmano ’nartha-hetuṣu
[aatmano ’nartha-hetushu]
utpattyā eva — simply by birth hi — indeed kāmeṣu — in objects of selfish desires prāṇeṣu — in vital functions (such as one’s duration of life, sense activities, physical strength and sexual potency) sva-janeṣu — in his family members ca — and āsakta-manasaḥ — having become attached within the mind martyāḥ — mortal human beings ātmanaḥ — of their real self anartha — of defeating the purpose hetuṣu — which are the causes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
utpattyaiva hi kāmeṣu
utpattyā eva
simply by birth
hi
indeed
kāmeṣu
in objects of selfish desires
prāṇeṣu sva-janeṣu ca
prāṇeṣu
in vital functions (such as one’s duration of life, sense activities, physical strength and sexual potency)
sva-janeṣu
in his family members
ca
and
āsakta-manaso martyā
āsakta-manasaḥ
having become attached within the mind
martyāḥ
mortal human beings
ātmano ’nartha-hetuṣu
ātmanaḥ
of their real self
anartha
of defeating the purpose
hetuṣu
which are the causes.
Simply by material birth, human beings become attached within their minds to personal sense gratification, long duration of life, sense activities, bodily strength, sexual potency and friends and family. Their minds are thus absorbed in that which defeats their actual self-interest.

Our attachment to the material body and the bodies of family and friends inevitably leads to unbearable anxiety and suffering. The mind absorbed in the bodily concept of life cannot possibly advance in self-realization, and thus one’s hope for an eternal life of bliss and knowledge is defeated by the objects of one’s so-called affection. Activities performed in ignorance are beneficial neither for oneself nor others, just as the charitable activities one may perform in a dream bestow no tangible benefit on real people. The conditioned soul is dreaming of a world separate from God, but any advancement experienced in this dream world is merely hallucination. The Lord states in Bhagavad-gītā, sarva-loka-maheśvaram: He is the supreme enjoyer and Lord of all planets and worlds. Only by Kṛṣṇa consciousness, recognition of the supremacy of God, can one make actual progress in life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Simply by material birth, human beings become attached within their minds to enjoyment of sense objects, long duration of life, sense activities, bodily strength, power and family members, which end in suffering for them. “But in karma-kāṇḍa we never hear about liberation? Where is it explained that karma is meant for liberation? That subject we do not learn from the literal meaning of those scriptures.” The concept is explained in two verses. By birth, men’s minds are absorbed in enjoying sense objects (kāmeśu), in their life span, senses, strength and power, in their sons and family members, which end as causes of suffering (anartha-hetuṣu).
Material birth attaches the mind to gratification, longevity, sense activity, strength, sexual potency, friends, family — absorbed in what defeats real self-interest. The natural drift is toward the wrong things.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of these attachments most strongly pulls my attention?
  • What real self-interest am I defeating by it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.25

↗
न तानविदुष: स्वार्थं भ्राम्यतो वृजिनाध्वनि । कथं युञ्ज्यात् पुनस्तेषु तांस्तमो विशतो बुध: ॥ २५ ॥
natān aviduṣaḥ svārthaṁ
[nataan avidushah svaartham]
bhrāmyato vṛjinādhvani
[bhraamyato vrijinaadhvani]
kathaṁ yuñjyāt punas teṣu
[katham yunjyaat punas teshu]
tāṁs tamo viśato budhaḥ
[taams tamo vishato budhah]
natān — submissive aviduṣaḥ — ignorant sva-artham — of their own interest bhrāmyataḥ — wandering vṛjina — of danger adhvani — upon the path katham — for what purpose yuñjyāt — would cause to engage punaḥ — further teṣu — in those (modes of sense gratification) tān — them tamaḥ — darkness viśataḥ — who are entering budhaḥ — the intelligent (Vedic authority).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
natān aviduṣaḥ svārthaṁ
natān
submissive
aviduṣaḥ
ignorant
sva-artham
of their own interest
bhrāmyato vṛjinādhvani
bhrāmyataḥ
wandering
vṛjina
of danger
adhvani
upon the path
kathaṁ yuñjyāt punas teṣu
katham
for what purpose
yuñjyāt
would cause to engage
punaḥ
further
teṣu
in those (modes of sense gratification)
tāṁs tamo viśato budhaḥ
tān
them
tamaḥ
darkness
viśataḥ
who are entering
budhaḥ
the intelligent (Vedic authority).
Those ignorant of their real self-interest are wandering on the path of material existence, gradually heading toward darkness. Why would the Vedas further encourage them in sense gratification if they, although foolish, submissively pay heed to Vedic injunctions?

Materialistic persons are not prepared to renounce society, friendship and love, which are all based on sex indulgence, to instead take to a life of renunciation and self-realization. In order to bring such foolish persons under the canopy of Vedic injunctions, the Vedas promise innumerable material rewards, even promotion to heavenly planets, to those who faithfully execute the Vedic injunctions. As explained by the Lord, such rewards are like the candy offered to a child, who then faithfully takes his medicine. Material enjoyment is certainly the cause of suffering, since all enjoyable objects are subject to destruction along with the so-called enjoyer. Material life is simply painful and full of anxiety, frustration and lamentation. We become agitated by seeing a so-called enjoyable object, such as the naked body of a woman, a beautiful residence, a sumptuous tray of food or the expansion of our own prestige, but actually such imagined happiness is simply the intense expectation of a satisfaction that never comes. One remains perpetually frustrated in material existence, and the more one tries to enjoy, the more one’s frustration increases. Therefore, the Vedic knowledge, which aims at ultimate peace and happiness on the spiritual platform, cannot possibly authorize the materialistic way of life. Material rewards are employed by the Vedas merely as inducements for the conditioned soul to take the medicine, submission to the Supreme Lord, Viṣṇu, through various types of sacrifice. Those who are veda-vāda-rata claim that religious scriptures are meant to facilitate sense gratification in the ignorance of conditioned life. The true goal of religion, however, is spiritual liberation, in which material sense gratification ceases to exist. The darkness of bodily attachment cannot exist in the effulgent light of spiritual knowledge. In the ocean of spiritual bliss, the anxiety-ridden apparent pleasure of this world vanishes completely. The true meaning of veda, or perfect knowledge, is to surrender to the Supreme Lord in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness for an eternal life of bliss and knowledge as the Lord’s faithful servant.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Why would the Vedas encourage persons ignorant of the highest bliss but who are submissive to the Vedas, who are wandering on the path of karma from body to body, to again take a low birth? The foolish people who do not know their highest happiness (svārtham) but have faith that what the Vedas reveal is most beneficial (natān) are wandering on the path of danger, the path of karma, in various bodies such as devatā and human. Why would the Vedas (budhaḥ) encourage these people who will receive birth as trees or other low forms (tamaḥ) to enjoy their senses? The Vedas would then have no authority.
The ignorant are wandering toward darkness — why would the Vedas further encourage them in sense gratification? The candy is to make them take the medicine.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I take scriptural permissions as endorsements?
  • How does this teaching adjust my reading?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.26

↗
एवं व्यवसितं केचिदविज्ञाय कुबुद्धय: । फलश्रुतिं कुसुमितां न वेदज्ञा वदन्ति हि ॥ २६ ॥
evaṁ vyavasitaṁ kecid
[evam vyavasitam kechid]
avijñāya kubuddhayaḥ
[avijnaaya kubuddhayah]
phala-śrutiṁ kusumitāṁ
[phala-shrutim kusumitaam]
na veda-jñā vadanti hi
[na veda-jnaa vadanti hi]
evam — in this way vyavasitam — the actual conclusion kecit — some people avijñāya — not understanding ku-buddhayaḥ — having perverted intelligence phala-śrutim — the scriptural statements promising material rewards kusumitām — flowery na — do not veda-jñāḥ — those in full knowledge of the Vedas vadanti — speak hi — indeed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vyavasitaṁ kecid
evam
in this way
vyavasitam
the actual conclusion
kecit
some people
avijñāya kubuddhayaḥ
avijñāya
not understanding
ku-buddhayaḥ
having perverted intelligence
phala-śrutiṁ kusumitāṁ
phala-śrutim
the scriptural statements promising material rewards
kusumitām
flowery
na veda-jñā vadanti hi
na
do not
veda-jñāḥ
those in full knowledge of the Vedas
vadanti
speak
hi
indeed.
Persons with perverted intelligence do not understand this actual purpose of Vedic knowledge and instead propagate as the highest Vedic truth the flowery statements of the Vedas that promise material rewards. Those in actual knowledge of the Vedas never speak in that way.

The followers of the karma-mīmāṁsā philosophy declare that there is no eternal kingdom of God beyond this universe and that one should therefore become a professional performer of Vedic rituals in order to keep oneself in a material heavenly planet. As explained by the Lord to Śrī Uddhava in a previous chapter, there is no actual happiness in the material world, since one will inevitably rotate throughout the various planetary environments stretching from heaven to hell and thus always be disturbed within the material atmosphere. Although the doctor may give a child candy-covered medicine, one who urges the child to eat the candy and throw away the medicine is certainly a great fool. In the same way, the flowery statements of the Vedas describing heavenly enjoyment do not award the real fruit of Vedic knowledge but merely supply decorative blossoms of sense gratification. As stated in the Vedas ( Ṛg Veda 1.22.20), tad viṣṇoḥ paramaṁ padaṁ sadā paśyanti sūrayaḥ. Even the demigods, who are permanent residents of heaven, are always looking to the eternal abode of the Supreme Lord. Foolish people who admire the standard of living in material heaven should therefore note that the demigods themselves are devotees of the Supreme Lord. One should not become a bogus propagator of so-called Vedic knowledge but should take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness and make a genuine solution to the problem of progressing in life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some persons, not knowing the intention of the Vedas, speak of the attractive material results of karma, which are flowers and not fruit. They are fools. Those who know the Vedas do not speak in this way. Why do the Mīmāṁsakas say that attaining Svarga is the highest goal? Not knowing the intention of the Vedas, they speak about the attractive results mentioned there as authoritative. Actually however those are the flowers, not the fruit. The results mentioned in the scriptures are flowers, not fruits. They mistake the flowers for the fruit. These persons are foolish. They do not know the goal of the Vedas, since those who know the Vedas such as Vyāsa do not say this.
Perverse intelligence propagates the Vedas' flowery material promises as supreme truth; actual knowers never speak this way. The marker of wisdom is what it refuses to elevate.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I elevate the flowery over the substantive?
  • What is one substantive teaching I have been quietly skipping?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.27

↗
कामिन: कृपणा लुब्धा: पुष्पेषु फलबुद्धय: । अग्निमुग्धा धूमतान्ता: स्वं लोकं न विदन्ति ते ॥ २७ ॥
kāminaḥ kṛpaṇā lubdhāḥ
[kaaminah kripanaa lubdhaah]
puṣpeṣu phala-buddhayaḥ
[pushpeshu phala-buddhayah]
agni-mugdhā dhūma-tāntāḥ
[agni-mugdhaa dhooma-taantaah]
svaṁ lokaṁ na vidanti te
[svam lokam na vidanti te]
kāminaḥ — lusty persons kṛpaṇāḥ — miserly lubdhāḥ — greedy puṣpeṣu — flowers phala-buddhayaḥ — thinking to be the ultimate fruits agni — by fire mugdhāḥ — bewildered dhūma-tāntāḥ — suffocating from smoke svam — their own lokam — identity na vidanti — do not recognize te — they.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kāminaḥ kṛpaṇā lubdhāḥ
kāminaḥ
lusty persons
kṛpaṇāḥ
miserly
lubdhāḥ
greedy
puṣpeṣu phala-buddhayaḥ
puṣpeṣu
flowers
phala-buddhayaḥ
thinking to be the ultimate fruits
agni-mugdhā dhūma-tāntāḥ
agni
by fire
mugdhāḥ
bewildered
dhūma-tāntāḥ
suffocating from smoke
svaṁ lokaṁ na vidanti te
svam
their own
lokam
identity
na vidanti
do not recognize
te
they.
Those who are full of lust, avarice and greed mistake mere flowers to be the actual fruit of life. Bewildered by the glare of fire and suffocated by its smoke, they cannot recognize their own true identity.

Those attached to female association become proud separatists; desiring everything for their personal gratification and that of their lady friends, they become greedy misers, full of anxiety and envy. Such unfortunate persons mistake the flowery statements of the Vedas to be the highest perfection of life. The word agni-mugdhāḥ, “bewildered by fire,” indicates that such persons consider Vedic fire sacrifices awarding material benefit to be the highest religious truth, and thus they merge into ignorance. Fire produces smoke, which obscures one’s vision. Similarly, the path of fruitive fire sacrifices is cloudy and obscure, without clear understanding of the spirit soul. The Lord here clearly states that fruitive religionists cannot understand their actual spiritual identity, nor do they realize the genuine shelter of the spirit soul in the kingdom of God.

Lord Kṛṣṇa states in Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) , vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ: all Vedic knowledge is actually meant to lead one to pure love of Godhead. Lord Kṛṣṇa is certainly the Absolute Truth, and to love Him is the ultimate purpose of our existence. The Vedic knowledge patiently tries to bring the conditioned soul to this perfection of pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Those who are full of lust, avarice and greed mistake mere flowers to be the actual fruits. Bewildered by the glare of fire and fatigued by its smoke, they cannot recognize the Lord. The foolish persons are described in eight verses. They think that the intermediate results, the flowers, are the highest result. They have lost discrimination by becoming absorbed in sacrifices, and become exhausted by treading the path of smoke, Svarga, and by the smoke from the sacrificial fire. Śruti says kaścit svaṁ lokaṁ na pratijānāti agni-mugdho haiva dhūmatāntaḥ : not knowing the Lord, absorbed in sacrifice, they become fatigued by the smoke.
The lusty mistake mere flowers for the actual fruit; bewildered by fire's glare and choked by smoke, they don't know themselves. Beauty and discomfort together can obscure identity.
Reflection Questions
  • What flowers have I confused with fruit lately?
  • Where do glare and smoke prevent my self-knowing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.28

↗
न ते मामङ्ग जानन्ति हृदिस्थं य इदं यत: । उक्थशस्‍‍‍‍‍त्रा ह्यसुतृपो यथा नीहारचक्षुष: ॥ २८ ॥
na te mām aṅga jānanti
[na te maam anga jaananti]
hṛdi-sthaṁ ya idaṁ yataḥ
[hridi-stham ya idam yatah]
uktha-śastrā hy asu-tṛpo
[uktha-shastraa hy asu-tripo]
yathā nīhāra-cakṣuṣaḥ
[yathaa neehaara-chakshushah]
na — do not te — they mām — Me aṅga — My dear Uddhava jānanti — know hṛdi-stham — seated within the heart yaḥ — who is idam — this created universe yataḥ — from whom it comes uktha-śastrāḥ — who consider Vedic ritual activities to be praiseworthy, or else, for whom their own ritualistic performances are like the weapon that kills the sacrificial animal hi — indeed asu-tṛpaḥ — interested only in sense gratification yathā — just as nīhāra — in fog cakṣuṣaḥ — those whose eyes.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na te mām aṅga jānanti
na
do not
te
they
mām
Me
aṅga
My dear Uddhava
jānanti
know
hṛdi-sthaṁ ya idaṁ yataḥ
hṛdi-stham
seated within the heart
yaḥ
who is
idam
this created universe
yataḥ
from whom it comes
uktha-śastrā hy asu-tṛpo
uktha-śastrāḥ
who consider Vedic ritual activities to be praiseworthy, or else, for whom their own ritualistic performances are like the weapon that kills the sacrificial animal
hi
indeed
asu-tṛpaḥ
interested only in sense gratification
yathā
just as
yathā nīhāra-cakṣuṣaḥ
nīhāra
in fog
cakṣuṣaḥ
those whose eyes.
My dear Uddhava, persons dedicated to sense gratification obtained through honoring the Vedic rituals cannot understand that I am situated in everyone’s heart and that the entire universe is nondifferent from Me and emanates from Me. Indeed, they are just like persons whose eyes are covered by fog.

The word uktha-śastrāḥ refers to the chanting of certain Vedic hymns, by which one obtains fruitive results in this world and the next. The word śastra also indicates a weapon, and thus uktha-śastra also means the weapon used in Vedic sacrifice to kill the sacrificial animal. Persons exploiting Vedic knowledge for bodily gratification are slaughtering themselves with the weapon of materialistic religious principles. They are also compared to those trying to see within a dense fog. The false bodily concept of life, in which one ignores the eternal soul within the body, is a dense fog of ignorance that blocks our vision of God. Lord Kṛṣṇa therefore begins His instruction in Bhagavad-gītā by clearing away the dense ignorance of the bodily concept of life. Religion means the law of God. The Lord’s final order, or law, is that every conditioned soul surrender unto Him, learn to serve and love Him, and thus go back home, back to Godhead. This is the process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Uddhava! Persons dedicated to sense gratification obtained through honoring the Vedic rituals cannot understand that I am situated in everyone’s heart and that the entire universe is nondifferent from me and emanates from me, because their eyes are covered by ignorance. Who is the person (lokam) they do not know? They do not know me, the antaryāmī situated in their heart. I am this universe. “But you are a conscious form, not this universe.” From me the universe arises. I am the universe because I am its cause. They consider karma to be praiseworthy, or they consider that it involves killing animals (uktha-śastrā). They are dedicated to satisfying themselves (asu-tṛpaḥ). What is the cause of this? Their eyes are covered by ignorance. na taṁ vidātha ya imā jajānānyad yuṣmākam antaraṁ babhūva | nīhāreṇa prāvṛtā jalpyā cāsu-tṛpa uktha-śāsaś caranti || You do not know him who produced these creatures, who dwells within you. Surrounded by ignorance, uttering mantras to maintain themselves, the priests carry out their actions. Ṛg Veda 10.83.7
Persons dedicated to gratification through Vedic ritual cannot understand that the Lord is in the heart and that the universe is non-different from Him. Their eyes are functionally covered.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my own practices serve gratification more than realization?
  • What does honest acknowledgment open?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.29-30

↗
ते मे मतमविज्ञाय परोक्षं विषयात्मका: । हिंसायां यदि राग: स्याद् यज्ञ एव न चोदना ॥ २९ ॥ हिंसाविहारा ह्यालब्धै: पशुभि: स्वसुखेच्छया । यजन्ते देवता यज्ञै: पितृभूतपतीन् खला: ॥ ३० ॥
te me matam avijñāya
[te me matam avijnaaya]
parokṣaṁ viṣayātmakāḥ
[paroksham vishayaatmakaah]
hiṁsāyāṁ yadi rāgaḥ syād
[himsaayaam yadi raagah syaad]
yajña eva na codanā
[yajna eva na chodanaa]
hiṁsā-vihārā hy ālabdhaiḥ
[himsaa-vihaaraa hy aalabdhaih]
paśubhiḥ sva-sukhecchayā
[pashubhih sva-sukhechchayaa]
yajante devatā yajñaiḥ
[yajante devataa yajnaih]
pitṛ-bhūta-patīn khalāḥ
[pitri-bhoota-pateen khalaah]
te — they me — My matam — conclusion avijñāya — without understanding parokṣam — confidential viṣaya-ātmakāḥ — absorbed in sense gratification hiṁsāyām — to violence yadi — if rāgaḥ — attachment syāt — may be yajñe — in the sacrificial prescriptions eva — certainly na — there is not codanā — encouragement hiṁsā-vihārāḥ — those who take pleasure in violence hi — indeed ālabdhaiḥ — which have been slaughtered paśubhiḥ — by means of the animals sva-sukha — for their own happiness icchayā — with the desire yajante — they worship devatāḥ — the demigods yajñaiḥ — by sacrificial rituals pitṛ — the forefathers bhūta-patīn — and the leaders among the ghostly spirits khalāḥ — cruel persons.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te me matam avijñāya
te
they
me
My
matam
conclusion
avijñāya
without understanding
parokṣaṁ viṣayātmakāḥ
parokṣam
confidential
viṣaya-ātmakāḥ
absorbed in sense gratification
hiṁsāyāṁ yadi rāgaḥ syād
hiṁsāyām
to violence
yadi
if
rāgaḥ
attachment
syāt
may be
yajña eva na codanā
yajñe
in the sacrificial prescriptions
eva
certainly
na
there is not
codanā
encouragement
hiṁsā-vihārā hy ālabdhaiḥ
hiṁsā-vihārāḥ
those who take pleasure in violence
paśubhiḥ sva-sukhecchayā
hi
indeed
yajante devatā yajñaiḥ
pitṛ-bhūta-patīn khalāḥ
ālabdhaiḥ
which have been slaughtered
paśubhiḥ
by means of the animals
sva-sukha
for their own happiness
icchayā
with the desire
yajante
they worship
devatāḥ
the demigods
yajñaiḥ
by sacrificial rituals
pitṛ
the forefathers
bhūta-patīn
and the leaders among the ghostly spirits
khalāḥ
cruel persons.
Those who are sworn to sense gratification cannot understand the confidential conclusion of Vedic knowledge as explained by Me. Taking pleasure in violence, they cruelly slaughter innocent animals in sacrifice for their own sense gratification and thus worship demigods, forefathers and leaders among ghostly creatures. Such passion for violence, however, is never encouraged within the process of Vedic sacrifice.

The Vedic scriptures sanction occasional animal sacrifice to satisfy cruel, low-class men who cannot live without the taste of flesh and blood. Such concessions, however, are restricted by rigorous obligatory rituals and are meant to gradually discourage animal killing, just as the exorbitant cost of a liquor license restricts the number of retail outlets selling alcoholic beverages. But unscrupulous persons misconstrue such restrictive sanctions and declare that Vedic sacrifice is meant for killing animals in order to enjoy sense gratification. Being materialistic, they desire to attain the planets of the forefathers or demigods and thus worship such beings. Sometimes materialistic persons are attracted to the subtle lifestyle of ghosts and worship ghostly creatures. These methods constitute gross ignorance of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is the actual enjoyer of all sacrifice and austerity. The demons perform Vedic sacrifice but are inimical to Lord Nārāyaṇa, for they consider the demigods, the forefathers or Lord Śiva to be equal to God. Although understanding the authority of Vedic rituals, they do not accept the ultimate Vedic conclusion and therefore never surrender to God. Thus false religious principles flourish in the demoniac societies of the animal killers. Although in countries like America people outwardly profess to be followers of God alone, actual worship and glorification is offered to innumerable popular heroes such as entertainers, politicians, athletes and other equally insignificant persons. Animal killers, being grossly materialistic, are inevitably attracted to the extraordinary features of material illusion; they cannot understand the real platform of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or spiritual life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Those who are attached to sense gratification, not understanding the confidential conclusion of Vedic knowledge as explained by me, their minds overcome with enjoyment and taking pleasure in violence, worship devatās, Pitṛs and ghosts by sacrifices with animal killing for their own happiness. They think that the Vedas permit violence through sacrifice if one has such attachment, though this is not the injunction. Not knowing me, they do not know the meaning of the Vedas approved by me. Not knowing my opinion which is hidden (parokṣam), they worship devatās, Pitrṣ and ghosts by sacrifice. Their mistaken idea is presented: they assume the Vedas say that if one is not able to give up killing animals, then one is permitted to do so by performing sacrifices. But this is not the injunction. Not knowing my intention, with minds overcome by material enjoyment, they take pleasure in violence.
Those sworn to gratification cannot grasp the confidential Vedic conclusion; taking pleasure in violence, they slaughter innocent animals in sacrifice to demigods and ancestors, mistaken in their worship. Violence shows the level of misunderstanding.
Reflection Questions
  • Where might my own pleasures be enabled by violence I prefer not to see?
  • What might subtracting that violence open?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.31

↗
स्वप्नोपमममुं लोकमसन्तं श्रवणप्रियम् । आशिषो हृदि सङ्कल्प्य त्यजन्त्यर्थान् यथा वणिक् ॥ ३१ ॥
svapnopamam amuṁ lokam
[svapnopamam amum lokam]
asantaṁ śravaṇa-priyam
[asantam shravana-priyam]
āśiṣo hṛdi saṅkalpya
[aashisho hridi sankalpya]
tyajanty arthān yathā vaṇik
[tyajanty arthaan yathaa vanik]
svapna — a dream upamam — equal to amum — that lokam — world (after death) asantam — unreal śravaṇa-priyam — only enchanting to hear about āśiṣaḥ — mundane achievements in this life hṛdi — in their hearts saṅkalpya — imagining tyajanti — they give up arthān — their wealth yathā — like vaṇik — a businessman.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
svapnopamam amuṁ lokam
svapna
a dream
upamam
equal to
amum
that
lokam
world (after death)
asantaṁ śravaṇa-priyam
asantam
unreal
śravaṇa-priyam
only enchanting to hear about
āśiṣo hṛdi saṅkalpya
āśiṣaḥ
mundane achievements in this life
hṛdi
in their hearts
saṅkalpya
imagining
tyajanty arthān yathā vaṇik
tyajanti
they give up
arthān
their wealth
yathā
like
vaṇik
a businessman.
Just as a foolish businessman gives up his real wealth in useless business speculation, foolish persons give up all that is actually valuable in life and instead pursue promotion to material heaven, which although pleasing to hear about is actually unreal, like a dream. Such bewildered persons imagine within their hearts that they will achieve all material blessings.

All over the world people are working hard to achieve perfect sense gratification in this life or the next. As eternal living beings, part and parcel of Lord Kṛṣṇa, we are naturally endowed with all bliss and knowledge in the association of the Lord. But giving up this exalted position of spiritual bliss and knowledge, we foolishly waste our time pursuing the phantasmagoria of bodily happiness, just like a foolish businessman who squanders his real assets in imaginary business ventures that deliver no real profit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as a foolish businessman gives up his present wealth in exchange for a promise of some future treasure, foolish persons spend their wealth on sacrifices, imagining blessings in the present life and promotion to material heaven in the future, which, although pleasing to hear about, are actually unreal, like a dream. Moreover, they have very little intelligence. Desiring pleasant next life and blessings in this life, which are as if unreal, but at the same not confirming those results because it is difficult to do so, they spend their wealth in performing karmas. Similarly a merchant with a desire for great wealth to be attained by crossing a difficult ocean gives up his present wealth, and then ends up with nothing.
A foolish businessman gives up real wealth for useless speculation, just as fools give up real value for material heaven, which is unreal like a dream. The trade is named as a bad deal.
Reflection Questions
  • What dreamlike 'heaven' am I trading real value for?
  • What honest accounting would help me see the trade?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.32

↗
रज:सत्त्वतमोनिष्ठा रज:सत्त्वतमोजुष: । उपासत इन्द्रमुख्यान् देवादीन् न यथैव माम् ॥ ३२ ॥
rajaḥ-sattva-tamo-niṣṭhā
[rajah-sattva-tamo-nishthaa]
rajaḥ-sattva-tamo-juṣaḥ
[rajah-sattva-tamo-jushah]
upāsata indra-mukhyān
[upaasata indra-mukhyaan]
devādīn na yathaiva mām
[devaadeen na yathaiva maam]
rajaḥ — in the mode of passion sattva — goodness tamaḥ — or ignorance niṣṭhāḥ — established rajaḥ — passion sattva — goodness tamaḥ — or ignorance juṣaḥ — who manifest upāsate — they worship indra-mukhyān — headed by Lord Indra deva-ādīn — the demigods and other deities na — but not yathā eva — in the proper way mām — Me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rajaḥ-sattva-tamo-niṣṭhā
rajaḥ
in the mode of passion
sattva
goodness
tamaḥ
or ignorance
niṣṭhāḥ
established
rajaḥ-sattva-tamo-juṣaḥ
rajaḥ
passion
sattva
goodness
tamaḥ
or ignorance
juṣaḥ
who manifest
upāsata indra-mukhyān
upāsate
they worship
indra-mukhyān
headed by Lord Indra
devādīn na yathaiva mām
deva-ādīn
the demigods and other deities
na
but not
yathā eva
in the proper way
mām
Me.
Those established in material passion, goodness and ignorance worship the particular demigods and other deities, headed by Indra, who manifest the same modes of passion, goodness or ignorance. They fail, however, to properly worship Me.

Although the demigods are part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, demigod worship fosters the false idea that the demigods exist apart from the Supreme Lord. Such worship is avidhi-pūrvakam, or an improper approach to the Absolute Truth. Śrīla Madhvācārya quotes from the Hari-vaṁśa that among those primarily in the mode of ignorance there are sometimes manifestations of passion and goodness. Ignorant persons possessing a tendency toward goodness may go to hell but are also allowed a little heavenly pleasure. Thus it can be seen that a man suffering in miserable financial or political conditions sometimes enjoys the company of a beautiful wife, though his general condition is hellish. Those in ignorance mixed slightly with passion simply go to hell, and those purely in the mode of ignorance glide down to the darkest region of hell. Those devoid of devotion to the Supreme Lord are in ignorance in these three categories. Sometimes persons situated in the mode of goodness accept the supremacy of the Supreme Lord but are more attracted to the demigods, believing that through Vedic rituals they can achieve the same standard of living as the demigods. This proud tendency is certainly an obstacle in the loving service of the Supreme Lord and ultimately causes falldown.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
People established in material passion, goodness and ignorance and serving in those modes worship Indra and other devatās. But they do not worship me in the correct way. Those who are fixed in rajas, sattva or tamas serve in rajas, sattva or tamas. Though worshipping Indra is also my worship since Indra is my aṁśa, it is not correct worship. Because they do not worship properly they fall from their position. It is said: ahaṁ hi sarva-yajñānāṁ bhoktā ca prabhur eva ca | na tu mām abhijānanti tattvenātaś cyavanti te || I am the enjoyer and master of all sacrifices. Those who do not know me in truth fall down. BG 9.24
Those in passion, goodness, or ignorance worship the deities matching their mode, headed by Indra, and fail to properly worship the Lord. Mode determines worship's address.
Reflection Questions
  • Which mode currently colors my worship?
  • What practice would purify the address?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.33-34

↗
इष्ट्वेह देवता यज्ञैर्गत्वा रंस्यामहे दिवि । तस्यान्त इह भूयास्म महाशाला महाकुला: ॥ ३३ ॥ एवं पुष्पितया वाचा व्याक्षिप्तमनसां नृणाम् । मानिनां चातिलुब्धानां मद्वार्तापि न रोचते ॥ ३४ ॥
iṣṭveha devatā yajñair
[ishtveha devataa yajnair]
gatvā raṁsyāmahe divi
[gatvaa ramsyaamahe divi]
tasyānta iha bhūyāsma
[tasyaanta iha bhooyaasma]
mahā-śālā mahā-kulāḥ
[mahaa-shaalaa mahaa-kulaah]
evaṁ puṣpitayā vācā
[evam pushpitayaa vaachaa]
vyākṣipta-manasāṁ nṛṇām
[vyaakshipta-manasaam nrinaam]
mānināṁ cāti-lubdhānāṁ
[maaninaam chaati-lubdhaanaam]
mad-vārtāpi na rocate
[mad-vaartaapi na rochate]
iṣṭvā — offering sacrifice iha — in this world devatāḥ — to the demigods yajñaiḥ — by our sacrifices gatvā — going raṁsyāmahe — we shall enjoy divi — in heaven tasya — of that enjoyment ante — at the end iha — on this earth bhūyāsmaḥ — we shall become mahā-śālāḥ — great householders mahā-kulāḥ — members of aristocratic families evam — thus puṣpitayā — by the flowery vācā — words vyākṣipta-manasām — for those whose minds are bewildered nṛṇām — men māninām — very proud ca — and ati-lubdhānām — extremely greedy mad-vārtā — topics about Me api — even na rocate — have no attraction.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iṣṭveha devatā yajñair
iṣṭvā
offering sacrifice
gatvā raṁsyāmahe divi
tasyānta iha bhūyāsma
iha
in this world
devatāḥ
to the demigods
yajñaiḥ
by our sacrifices
gatvā
going
raṁsyāmahe
we shall enjoy
divi
in heaven
mahā-śālā mahā-kulāḥ
evaṁ puṣpitayā vācā
tasya
of that enjoyment
vyākṣipta-manasāṁ nṛṇām
ante
at the end
iha
on this earth
bhūyāsmaḥ
we shall become
mānināṁ cāti-lubdhānāṁ
mahā-śālāḥ
great householders
mad-vārtāpi na rocate
mahā-kulāḥ
members of aristocratic families
evam
thus
puṣpitayā
by the flowery
vācā
words
vyākṣipta-manasām
for those whose minds are bewildered
nṛṇām
men
māninām
very proud
ca
and
ati-lubdhānām
extremely greedy
mad-vārtā
topics about Me
api
even
na rocate
have no attraction.
The worshipers of demigods think, “We shall worship the demigods in this life, and by our sacrifices we shall go to heaven and enjoy there. When that enjoyment is finished we shall return to this world and take birth as great householders in aristocratic families.” Being excessively proud and greedy, such persons are bewildered by the flowery words of the Vedas. They are not attracted to topics about Me, the Supreme Lord.

Real pleasure is found in the transcendental form of the Lord, who is the supreme Cupid, engaging in pastimes of love in the spiritual world. Neglecting the eternal bliss of the Lord’s pastimes, the foolish worshipers of the demigods dream of becoming like the Lord, but they achieve exactly the opposite result. In other words, they continue perpetually in the cycle of birth and death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The worshipers of devatās think, “We shall worship the devatās in this life, and by our sacrifices we shall go to heaven and enjoy there. When that enjoyment is finished we shall return to this world and take birth as great householders in aristocratic families.” Being excessively proud and greedy, such persons are bewildered by the flowery words of the Vedas. They are not attracted to topics about me. Their desire is described. After enjoyment in heaven, they enjoy as great householders.
Worshipers of demigods plan: 'We'll worship now, go to heaven, enjoy, return to aristocratic householder life' — excessively attached to ritual, they miss the Lord. The plan is detailed and worldly.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'spiritual plan' of mine is really a worldly plan with religious vocabulary?
  • How would the Lord's perspective rewrite it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.35

↗
वेदा ब्रह्मात्मविषयास्‍त्रिकाण्डविषया इमे । परोक्षवादा ऋषय: परोक्षं मम च प्रियम् ॥ ३५ ॥
vedā brahmātma-viṣayās
[vedaa brahmaatma-vishayaas]
tri-kāṇḍa-viṣayā ime
[tri-kaanda-vishayaa ime]
parokṣa-vādā ṛṣayaḥ
[paroksha-vaadaa rishayah]
parokṣaṁ mama ca priyam
[paroksham mama cha priyam]
vedāḥ — the Vedas brahma-ātma — the understanding that the soul is pure spirit viṣayāḥ — having as their subject matter tri-kāṇḍa-viṣayāḥ — divided into three sections (which represent fruitive work, worship of demigods and realization of the Absolute Truth) ime — these parokṣa-vādāḥ — speaking esoterically ṛṣayaḥ — the Vedic authorities parokṣam — indirect explanation mama — to Me ca — also priyam — dear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vedā brahmātma-viṣayās
vedāḥ
the Vedas
brahma-ātma
the understanding that the soul is pure spirit
viṣayāḥ
having as their subject matter
tri-kāṇḍa-viṣayā ime
tri-kāṇḍa-viṣayāḥ
divided into three sections (which represent fruitive work, worship of demigods and realization of the Absolute Truth)
ime
these
parokṣa-vādā ṛṣayaḥ
parokṣa-vādāḥ
speaking esoterically
ṛṣayaḥ
the Vedic authorities
parokṣaṁ mama ca priyam
parokṣam
indirect explanation
mama
to Me
ca
also
priyam
dear.
The Vedas, divided into three divisions, ultimately reveal the living entity as pure spirit soul. The Vedic seers and mantras, however, deal in esoteric terms, and I also am pleased by such confidential descriptions.

In the previous verses Lord Kṛṣṇa clearly refuted the concept that Vedic knowledge is meant for material enjoyment, and here the Lord summarizes the actual purpose of Vedic literature: self-realization. Although the conditioned souls are struggling in the network of material energy, their actual existence is transcendental freedom in the kingdom of God. The Vedas gradually lift the conditioned soul out of the darkness of illusion and establish him in the eternal loving service of the Lord. As stated in the Vedānta-sūtra (4.4.22), anāvṛttiḥ śabdāt: “One who properly hears Vedic knowledge does not have to return to the cycle of birth and death.”

One may ask why the Lord Himself as well as the Lord’s representatives, the Vedic seers and mantras, speak in esoteric or indirect terms. As the Lord states in Bhagavad-gītā, nāhaṁ prakāśaḥ sarvasya: the Supreme Lord does not allow Himself to be taken cheaply, and thus He is not manifest to superficial or inimical people. Those who are polluted by the material atmosphere are induced to purify themselves through Vedic rituals that offer fruitive results, just as a child is induced to take medicine by the offer of a candy reward. Because of the confidential nature of Vedic exposition, less intelligent persons cannot appreciate the ultimate transcendental purpose of the Vedas, and consequently they fall down to the platform of sense gratification.

The term brahmātma (“spirit soul”) ultimately indicates the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who states in Bhagavad-gītā that knowledge of Him is rāja-guhyam, the most confidential of all secrets. One who depends upon material sense perception remains in gross ignorance of the Absolute Truth. One who depends upon mental and intellectual speculation may get a clue that the eternal soul and Supersoul are both within the material body. But one who depends upon the Lord Himself, faithfully hearing the Lord’s own message in Bhagavad-gītā, perfectly understands the entire situation and goes back home, back to Godhead, having fulfilled the true purpose of Vedic knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Vedas, divided into three divisions, ultimately reveal worship of the Lord. The Vedic sages and mantras, however, state this indirectly, since they know that I prefer this indirect method. This summarizes the topic. The Vedas are divided into three: karma-kāṇḍa, brahma-kāṇḍa and devatā-kāṇḍa. They ultimately indicate worship of me (brahmātmā-viṣayāḥ). “Then why do the mantras, or sages who revealed the mantras, not clearly speak?” They speak indirectly, not directly. “What is the intention of not saying this directly?” Understanding that I prefer indirect speech, they speak in that way.
The Vedas in three divisions ultimately reveal the soul as pure spirit; seers and mantras use esoteric terms, and the Lord is pleased by such confidential descriptions. Layered language is part of the design.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I impatient with esoteric or confidential teaching?
  • What might patience with it reveal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.36

↗
शब्दब्रह्म सुदुर्बोधं प्राणेन्द्रियमनोमयम् । अनन्तपारं गम्भीरं दुर्विगाह्यं समुद्रवत् ॥ ३६ ॥
śabda-brahma su-durbodhaṁ
[shabda-brahma su-durbodham]
prāṇendriya-mano-mayam
[praanendriya-mano-mayam]
ananta-pāraṁ gambhīraṁ
[ananta-paaram gambheeram]
durvigāhyaṁ samudra-vat
[durvigaahyam samudra-vat]
śabda-brahma — the transcendental sound of the Vedas su-durbodham — extremely difficult to comprehend prāṇa — of the vital air indriya — senses manaḥ — and mind mayam — manifesting on the different levels ananta-pāram — without limit gambhīram — deep durvigāhyam — unfathomable samudra-vat — like the ocean.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śabda-brahma su-durbodhaṁ
śabda-brahma
the transcendental sound of the Vedas
su-durbodham
extremely difficult to comprehend
prāṇendriya-mano-mayam
prāṇa
of the vital air
indriya
senses
manaḥ
and mind
mayam
manifesting on the different levels
ananta-pāraṁ gambhīraṁ
ananta-pāram
without limit
gambhīram
deep
durvigāhyaṁ samudra-vat
durvigāhyam
unfathomable
samudra-vat
like the ocean.
The transcendental sound of the Vedas is very difficult to comprehend and manifests on different levels within the prāṇa, senses and mind. This Vedic sound is unlimited, very deep and unfathomable, just like the ocean.

According to Vedic knowledge, the Vedic sound is divided into four phases, which can be understood only by the most intelligent brāhmaṇas. This is because three of the divisions are internally situated within the living entity and only the fourth division is externally manifested, as speech. Even this fourth phase of Vedic sound, called vaikharī, is very difficult to understand for ordinary human beings. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura explains these divisions as follows. The prāṇa phase of Vedic sound, known as parā, is situated in the ādhāra-cakra; the mental phase, known as paśyantī, is situated in the area of the navel, on the maṇipūraka-cakra; the intellectual phase, known as madhyamā, is situated in the heart area, in the anāhata-cakra. Finally, the manifest sensory phase of Vedic sound is called vaikharī.

Such Vedic sound is ananta-pāra because it comprehends all vital energies within the universe and beyond and is thus undivided by time or space. Actually, Vedic sound vibration is so subtle, unfathomable and deep that only the Lord Himself and His empowered followers such as Vyāsa and Nārada can understand its actual form and meaning. Ordinary human beings cannot comprehend all of the intricacies and subtleties of Vedic sound, but if one takes to Kṛṣṇa consciousness one can immediately understand the conclusion of all Vedic knowledge, namely Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself, the original source of Vedic knowledge. Foolish persons devote their vital air, senses and mind to sense gratification and thus do not understand the transcendental value of the holy name of God. Ultimately, the essence of all Vedic sound is the holy name of the Supreme Lord, which is not different from the Lord Himself. Since the Lord is unlimited, His holy name is equally unlimited. No one can understand the transcendental glories of the Lord without the Lord’s direct mercy. By offenselessly chanting the holy names Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare, one can enter into the transcendental mysteries of Vedic sound. Otherwise the knowledge of the Vedas will remain durvigāhyam, or impossible to penetrate.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The sound of the Vedas is very difficult to comprehend and manifests on different levels within the prāṇa, mind, intelligence and senses. This Vedic sound is unlimited and deep like the ocean. “Since there is no other way for people to accept the Vedas, the pleasures of Svarga are offered just as doctor offerings candy to the child so he will drink medicine. This you have explained. Jaimini and others also seem to explain things with a similar intention.” That is not so. If they had known, they would have explained this. No one can really know the meaning of the Vedas without me or my devotees like Vyāsa and Nārada. That is explained in this verse and till the end of the chapter. The Veda is difficult to understand regarding its true nature and function. It has two forms, gross and subtle. The subtle form of the Vedas is difficult to understand. First, the Veda is parā, related to prāṇa, situated in the mūlādhāra-cakra. Then it becomes paśyantī, related to mind, situated in the navel in the manīpūra-cakra. Then it becomes madhyamā, related to intelligence, situated in the heart in the anāhata-cakra. Then it becomes vaikharī, related to the senses. In using speech, the sense organ called the voice is prominent. Moreover the Veda, made of material and spiritual prāṇa, is infinite (ananda-param), not divided by space or time. In terms of meaning it is also difficult to understand. Its meaning is very deep, and thus difficult to comprehend. Śruti says: catvāri vāk-parimitā padāni tāni vidur brāhmaṇā ye manīṣiṇaḥ | guhāyāṁ trīṇi nihitā neṅgayanti turīyaṁ vāco manuṣyā vadanti || Wise men know the four aspects of sound in the Vedas, by which truth is known. They do not reveal the three aspects which are hidden within the body. Men speak the fourth form as words. Ṛg-veda 1.164.45 The meaning is this. The words of the Vedas (vāk) are measured (parimitā). The form parimitā instead of parimitāni is Vedic usage accrodding to Pāṇini 7.1.39. Padāni means those forms by which the supreme truth is known (padyate). The sounds have four forms which the wise know. They do not reveal the nature of the three which are hidden in the body because men speak the fourth form vaikharī. Men speak this but they do not know the truth. There is another verse concerning this: yā sā mitrā-varuṇa-sadanād uccarantī triṣaṣṭhiṁ varṇānantaḥ-prakaṭa-karaṇaiḥ prāṇa-saṁjñā prasūte | tāṁ paśyantīṁ prathamam uditāṁ madhyamāṁ buddhi-saṁsthāṁ vācaṁ cakre karaṇa-viśadāṁ vaikharīṁ ca prapadye || That sound spoken from the house of Mitrā and Varuṇa composed of sixty-three sounds appeared as prāṇa (or parā) with the senses manifested within. It first became paśyantī, then madhyamā situated with intelligence, and then vaikharī, which is clear to the senses, in the viśuddhi-cakra.
The Vedic sound is hard to comprehend, manifesting on different levels in prāṇa, senses, and mind — unlimited, deep, oceanic. The text refuses to flatten itself.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I expect scripture to be easy and feel disappointed when it isn't?
  • What does it mean that depth is the actual gift?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.37

↗
मयोपबृंहितं भूम्ना ब्रह्मणानन्तशक्तिना । भूतेषु घोषरूपेण बिसेषूर्णेव लक्ष्यते ॥ ३७ ॥
mayopabṛṁhitaṁ bhūmnā
[mayopabrimhitam bhoomnaa]
brahmaṇānanta-śaktinā
[brahmanaananta-shaktinaa]
bhūteṣu ghoṣa-rūpeṇa
[bhooteshu ghosha-roopena]
viseṣūrṇeva lakṣyate
[viseshoorneva lakshyate]
mayā — by Me upabṛṁhitam — established bhūmnā — by the unlimited brahmaṇā — the changeless Absolute ananta-śaktinā — whose potencies have no end bhūteṣu — within the living beings ghoṣa-rūpeṇa — in the form of subtle sound, the oṁkāra viseṣu — in the subtle fibrous covering of a lotus stalk ūrṇā — one thread iva — as lakṣyate — appears.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mayopabṛṁhitaṁ bhūmnā
mayā
by Me
brahmaṇānanta-śaktinā
bhūteṣu ghoṣa-rūpeṇa
upabṛṁhitam
established
bhūmnā
by the unlimited
brahmaṇā
the changeless Absolute
ananta-śaktinā
whose potencies have no end
bhūteṣu
within the living beings
ghoṣa-rūpeṇa
in the form of subtle sound, the oṁkāra
viseṣūrṇeva lakṣyate
viseṣu
in the subtle fibrous covering of a lotus stalk
ūrṇā
one thread
iva
as
lakṣyate
appears.
As the unlimited, unchanging and omnipotent Personality of Godhead dwelling within all living beings, I personally establish the Vedic sound vibration in the form of oṁkāra within all living entities. It is thus perceived subtly, just like a single strand of fiber on a lotus stalk.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead personally resides within the heart of every living entity, and from this verse we can understand that the seed of all Vedic knowledge is also situated within all living beings. In this way, the process of awakening Vedic knowledge, and thereby awakening one’s eternal relationship with God, is natural and necessary for everyone. All perfection is found within the heart of the living being; as soon as the heart is purified by chanting the holy names of God, that perfection, Kṛṣṇa consciousness, immediately awakens.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Vedas, which are spread everywhere by me because I possess many forms, pervade everywhere as Brahman, and possess unlimited powers, are perceived by the wise as nāda within all beings, subtle as the threads within the lotus stalk. “How does such sound manifest within the living entities?” The Vedas are spread everywhere by me (upabṛṁhitam). “How can the Vedas which appeared in unlimited forms in unlimited Vaikuṇṭhas and unlimited universes be spread by you alone?” It is spread by me, because I have manifold forms (bhūmnā) and am the all-pervading Brahman. Not only am I all-pervading, I possess unlimited powers. Thus I can do this. The Veda is seen as nāda by the wise in all beings. An example is given of the subtle nature of nāda within. It is like the fine thread within the lotus stem.
The Lord personally establishes Vedic sound as oṁkāra in every living being, perceived subtly like a single strand on a lotus stalk. Sacred sound is built into the body of every being.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I tried to listen for the subtle sound rather than the loud one?
  • What practice quiets enough to hear it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.38-40

↗
यथोर्णनाभिर्हृदयादूर्णामुद्वमते मुखात् । आकाशाद् घोषवान् प्राणो मनसा स्पर्शरूपिणा ॥ ३८ ॥ छन्दोमयोऽमृतमय: सहस्रपदवीं प्रभु: । ओङ्काराद् व्यञ्जितस्पर्शस्वरोष्मान्त स्थभूषिताम् ॥ ३९ ॥ विचित्रभाषाविततां छन्दोभिश्चतुरुत्तरै: । अनन्तपारां बृहतीं सृजत्याक्षिपते स्वयम् ॥ ४० ॥
yathorṇanābhir hṛdayād
[yathornanaabhir hridayaad]
ūrṇām udvamate mukhāt
[oornaam udvamate mukhaat]
ākāśād ghoṣavān prāṇo
[aakaashaad ghoshavaan praano]
manasā sparśa-rūpiṇā
[manasaa sparsha-roopinaa]
chando-mayo ’mṛta-mayaḥ
[chando-mayo ’mrita-mayah]
sahasra-padavīṁ prabhuḥ
[sahasra-padaveem prabhuh]
oṁkārād vyañjita-sparśa-
[omkaaraad vyanjita-sparsha-]
svaroṣmāntastha-bhūṣitām
[svaroshmaantastha-bhooshitaam]
vicitra-bhāṣā-vitatāṁ
[vichitra-bhaashaa-vitataam]
chandobhiś catur-uttaraiḥ
[chandobhish chatur-uttaraih]
ananta-pārāṁ bṛhatīṁ
[ananta-paaraam brihateem]
sṛjaty ākṣipate svayam
[srijaty aakshipate svayam]
yathā — just as ūrṇa-nābhiḥ — a spider hṛdayāt — from its heart ūrṇām — its web udvamate — emits mukhāt — through its mouth ākāśāt — from the ether ghoṣa-vān — manifesting sound vibration prāṇaḥ — the Lord in the form of the original life air manasā — by means of the primeval mind sparśa-rūpiṇā — which exhibits the forms of the different phonemes of the alphabet, beginning with the sparśa letters chandaḥ-mayaḥ — comprising all the sacred Vedic meters amṛta-mayaḥ — full of transcendental pleasure sahasra-padavīm — which branches out in thousands of directions prabhuḥ — the Supreme Personality of Godhead oṁkārāt — from the subtle vibration oṁkāra vyañjita — expanded sparśa — with the consonant stops svara — vowels uṣma — sibilants anta-stha — and semivowels bhūṣitām — decorated vicitra — variegated bhāṣā — by verbal expressions vitatām — elaborated chandobhiḥ — along with the metrical arrangements catuḥ-uttaraiḥ — each having four syllables more than the previous ananta-pārām — limitless bṛhatīm — the great expanse of Vedic literature sṛjati — He creates ākṣipate — and withdraws svayam — Himself.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathorṇanābhir hṛdayād
yathā
just as
ūrṇām udvamate mukhāt
ūrṇa-nābhiḥ
a spider
hṛdayāt
from its heart
ākāśād ghoṣavān prāṇo
manasā sparśa-rūpiṇā
chando-mayo ’mṛta-mayaḥ
sahasra-padavīṁ prabhuḥ
oṁkārād vyañjita-sparśa-
svaroṣmāntastha-bhūṣitām
vicitra-bhāṣā-vitatāṁ
chandobhiś catur-uttaraiḥ
ūrṇām
its web
udvamate
emits
mukhāt
through its mouth
ananta-pārāṁ bṛhatīṁ
sṛjaty ākṣipate svayam
ākāśāt
from the ether
ghoṣa-vān
manifesting sound vibration
prāṇaḥ
the Lord in the form of the original life air
manasā
by means of the primeval mind
sparśa-rūpiṇā
which exhibits the forms of the different phonemes of the alphabet, beginning with the sparśa letters
chandaḥ-mayaḥ
comprising all the sacred Vedic meters
amṛta-mayaḥ
full of transcendental pleasure
sahasra-padavīm
which branches out in thousands of directions
prabhuḥ
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
oṁkārāt
from the subtle vibration oṁkāra
vyañjita
expanded
sparśa
with the consonant stops
svara
vowels
uṣma
sibilants
anta-stha
and semivowels
bhūṣitām
decorated
vicitra
variegated
bhāṣā
by verbal expressions
vitatām
elaborated
chandobhiḥ
along with the metrical arrangements
catuḥ-uttaraiḥ
each having four syllables more than the previous
ananta-pārām
limitless
bṛhatīm
the great expanse of Vedic literature
sṛjati
He creates
ākṣipate
and withdraws
svayam
Himself.
Just as a spider brings forth from its heart its web and emits it through its mouth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead manifests Himself as the reverberating primeval vital air, comprising all sacred Vedic meters and full of transcendental pleasure. Thus the Lord, from the ethereal sky of His heart, creates the great and limitless Vedic sound by the agency of His mind, which conceives of variegated sounds such as the sparśas. The Vedic sound branches out in thousands of directions, adorned with the different letters expanded from the syllable om: the consonants, vowels, sibilants and semivowels. The Veda is then elaborated by many verbal varieties, expressed in different meters, each having four more syllables than the previous one. Ultimately the Lord again withdraws His manifestation of Vedic sound within Himself.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī has given an elaborate technical explanation of these three verses, the understanding of which requires extensive linguistic knowledge of the Sanskrit language. The essential point is that transcendental knowledge is expressed through Vedic sound vibration, which is itself a manifestation of the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead. Vedic sound emanates from the Supreme Lord and is vibrated to glorify and understand Him. The conclusion of all Vedic sound vibration is found in Bhagavad-gītā, wherein the Lord states, vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ: all Vedic knowledge is simply meant to teach us to know and love God. One who always thinks of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who becomes the Lord’s devotee and who bows down to and worships the Lord with faith and devotion, chanting His holy name, has certainly achieved a perfect understanding of all that is indicated by the word veda (“knowledge”).

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as a spider brings forth from its heart its web and emits it through its mouth, the Supreme Lord, made of supreme bliss, made of the Vedas, taking support of ether, appears as parā sound made of prāṇa, and then creates and destroys, by his mind which produces the consonants and the manifest Vedas--which are unlimited in sound and meaning, decorated with the consonants, vowels, sibilants, and semivowels emanating from the subtle sound oṁ, and which are filled with a variety of languages and meters, each four syllables longer than the previous. Kṛṣṇa explains how the Vedas arise from himself starting from the form of parā made of prāṇa in three verses. Just as a spider emits a spider web from his heart through his mouth, the Lord as my portion, antaryāmī, composed of supreme bliss, composed of the Vedas consisting of all knowledge by my own energy, taking support of the ether, appears in the mūlādhāra-cakra of Hiraṇyagarbha (Brahmā). Previously it was said sa eṣa jīvo vivara-prasūtiḥ prāṇena ghoṣeṇa guhāṁ praviṣṭaḥ: I enter the mulādhāra-cakra of Brahmā along with the prāṇa phase of subtle parā sound. (SB 11.12.17) The Lord becomes like the ghoṣa or nāda, which becomes prāṇa. Becoming that prāṇa, the Lord creates the śruti predominated by vaikharī (bṛhatīm) by the mind. First he creates parā, then paśyantī (then madhyamā), and finally vaikharī. The Lord creates this and then destroys it. Describing the cause, mind is denoted in detail. The mind produces the consonant and other sounds. The Vedas are further described. They show many paths. The Vedas are ornamented with consonants and other sounds by contact with the throat and chest arising from oṁ. This oṁ is not the audible form, but a subtle form within the heart, being without limbs. Consonants are sounds beginning with ka and ending with ma. There are sixteen vowels (svara) starting with a. Sibilants (uṣma) are śa, ṣa, sa and ha. Semi-vowels are ya, ra, la and va. The Veda is filled with variety, with Vedic and common language. It has meters, each with four more syllables than the previous one. The Veda has no end in terms of sound and no limit in terms of meaning (ananta-pāram).
Like a spider emitting its web from within and through its mouth, the Lord manifests as primeval vital air comprising Vedic meters, full of transcendental pleasure. The cosmic system flows from one inner reservoir.
Reflection Questions
  • What does it do for me to see Vedic sound as cosmic 'web' from a single inner source?
  • How does this image deepen my reverence?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.41

↗
गायत्र्युष्णिगनुष्टुप् च बृहती पङ्‌क्तिरेव च । त्रिष्टुब्जगत्यतिच्छन्दो ह्यत्यष्‍ट्यतिजगद् विराट् ॥ ४१ ॥
gāyatry uṣṇig anuṣṭup ca
[gaayatry ushnig anushtup cha]
bṛhatī paṅktir eva ca
[brihatee panktir eva cha]
triṣṭub jagaty aticchando
[trishtub jagaty atichchando]
hy atyaṣṭy-atijagad-virāṭ
[hy atyashty-atijagad-viraat]
gāyatrī uṣṇik anuṣṭup ca — known as Gāyatrī, Uṣṇik and Anuṣṭup bṛhatī paṅktiḥ — Bṛhatī and Paṅkti eva ca — also triṣṭup jagatī aticchandaḥ — Triṣṭup, Jagatī and Aticchanda hi — indeed atyaṣṭi-atijagat-virāṭ — Atyaṣṭi, Atijagatī and Ativirāṭ.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gāyatry uṣṇig anuṣṭup ca
gāyatrī uṣṇik anuṣṭup ca
known as Gāyatrī, Uṣṇik and Anuṣṭup
bṛhatī paṅktir eva ca
bṛhatī paṅktiḥ
Bṛhatī and Paṅkti
eva ca
also
triṣṭub jagaty aticchando
triṣṭup jagatī aticchandaḥ
Triṣṭup, Jagatī and Aticchanda
hi
indeed
atyaṣṭi-atijagat-virāṭ
Atyaṣṭi, Atijagatī and Ativirāṭ.
hy atyaṣṭy-atijagad-virāṭ
The Vedic meters are Gāyatrī, Uṣṇik, Anuṣṭup, Bṛhatī, Paṅkti, Triṣṭup, Jagatī, Aticchanda, Atyaṣṭi, Atijagatī and Ativirāṭ.

The Gāyatrī meter has twenty-four syllables, the Uṣṇik twenty-eight, the Anuṣṭup thirty-two, and so on, each meter having four more syllables than the previous one. Vedic sound is called bṛhatī, or most expansive, and thus it is not possible for ordinary living entities to understand all the technical details in this matter.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Vedic meters are Gāyatrī, Uṣṇik, Anuṣṭup, Bṛhatī, Paṅkti, Triṣṭup, Jagatī, and other meters with many syllables such as Atyaṣṭi, Atijagatī and Virāṭ. Some of the meters in the Vedas are listed. Gāyatrī has twenty-four syllables. By increasing four syllables consecutively uṣnik and the rest to jagatī are formed. The verse is connected with the previous verse to show the meters. [Note: Gayatrī has 24 syllables. Uṣnik has 28 syllables. Anuṣṭubh has 32 syllables. Bṛhatī has 36 syllables. Paṅkti has 40 syllables. Triṣṭup has 44 syllables. Jagatī has 48 syllables. Atijagatī has 52 syllables. Virāṭ has 56 syllables. Atyāsṭi has 68 syllables.. ] The last line indicates meters with many syllables.
The Vedic meters are listed: Gāyatrī, Uṣṇik, Anuṣṭup, Bṛhatī, and so on — each with its own metric body. The enumeration itself honors detail.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I noticed which meters belong to the verses I most love?
  • What does honoring formal structure add to devotion?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.42

↗
किं विधत्ते किमाचष्टे किमनूद्य विकल्पयेत् । इत्यस्या हृदयं लोके नान्यो मद् वेद कश्चन ॥ ४२ ॥
kiṁ vidhatte kim ācaṣṭe
[kim vidhatte kim aachashte]
kim anūdya vikalpayet
[kim anoodya vikalpayet]
ity asyā hṛdayaṁ loke
[ity asyaa hridayam loke]
nānyo mad veda kaścana
[naanyo mad veda kashchana]
kim — what vidhatte — enjoins (in the ritualistic karma-kāṇḍa) kim — what ācaṣṭe — indicates (as the object of worship in the devatā-kāṇḍa) kim — what anūdya — describing in different aspects vikalpayet — raises the possibility of alternatives (in the jñāna-kāṇḍa) iti — thus asyāḥ — of Vedic literature hṛdayam — the heart, or confidential purpose loke — in this world na — does not anyaḥ — other mat — than Me veda — know kaścana — anyone.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kiṁ vidhatte kim ācaṣṭe
kim
what
vidhatte
enjoins (in the ritualistic karma-kāṇḍa)
kim
what
ācaṣṭe
indicates (as the object of worship in the devatā-kāṇḍa)
kim anūdya vikalpayet
kim
what
anūdya
describing in different aspects
vikalpayet
raises the possibility of alternatives (in the jñāna-kāṇḍa)
ity asyā hṛdayaṁ loke
iti
thus
asyāḥ
of Vedic literature
hṛdayam
the heart, or confidential purpose
loke
in this world
nānyo mad veda kaścana
na
does not
anyaḥ
other
mat
than Me
veda
know
kaścana
anyone.
In the entire world no one but Me actually understands the confidential purpose of Vedic knowledge. Thus people do not know what the Vedas are actually prescribing in the ritualistic injunctions of karma-kāṇḍa, or what object is actually being indicated in the formulas of worship found in the upāsanā-kāṇḍa, or that which is elaborately discussed through various hypotheses in the jñāna-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the Absolute Truth, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Since the Lord is the source, maintainer and ultimate goal of Vedic knowledge, He is veda-vit, or the only true knower of Vedic knowledge. So-called philosophers, either Vedic scholars or ordinary men, may give their sectarian opinion, but it is the Lord Himself who knows the confidential purpose of the Vedas. The Lord is the only actual shelter and lovable object for all living entities. As He states in the Tenth Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā (10.41) :

yad yad vibhūtimat sattvaṁ śrīmad ūrjitam eva vā tad tad evāvagaccha tvaṁ mama tejo-’ṁśa-sambhavam

“Know that all beautiful, glorious and mighty creations spring from but a spark of My splendor.” All beautiful, extraordinary and powerful manifestations are insignificant displays of the Lord’s own opulences. Although ordinary people may quarrel over the purpose of religion, the actual purpose is one, Kṛṣṇa consciousness, or pure love of Godhead. All Vedic formulas are understood to be preliminary stages leading to the perfect stage of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, in which one fully surrenders to the devotional service of the Lord. The pure devotees of the Lord represent Him within this world and never speak anything which is not authorized by the Lord. Because they are repeating the Lord’s own words, they are also to be understood as true knowers of the Veda.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
What do the Vedas instruct as action? What is the final meaning of the Vedas? What alternatives do the Vedas raise? No one except me or my dear devotee knows the intended meaning of the Vedas. It is difficult to know the actual svarūpa or nature of the Vedas. That has just been explained. The meaning is also difficult to understand. What is to be done by following the Vedas? What do the Vedas order the jīva to do for his benefit? What is the meaning of the Vedas? What is meant by indicating various alternatives? Should I do this? Or this? Or that? “The meaning is clear. The śruti indicates karma by seeing statements like ‘One should worship the sandhyās daily; by karma one goes to Pitṛ-loka.’ So this is what should be done. The śrutis indicate dharma as the meaning in statements like codanā-lakṣaṇo dharmaḥ: dharma is characterized by injunctions of the Vedas. This is the meaning of the Vedas. As for alternatives, there are alternative rules in dharma such as performing sacrifice by offering either rice or barley. Or, there are alternatives like bhakti, niṣkāma-karma and jñāna stated one after the other. Thus it is said: bhakti-yogaś ca yogaś ca mayā mānavy udīritaḥ | tayor ekatareṇaiva puruṣaḥ puruṣaṁ vrajet || I have indicated both bhakti and yoga, O Manavī! A person may attain the Lord by either of these processes.” O fools! This is not so! No one knows the intention (hṛdayam) of the Vedas except me! No one except a person dear to me can know the meaning intended by me.
Only the Lord understands the confidential purpose of Vedic knowledge; people don't actually know what karma-kāṇḍa prescribes or what is being indicated in worship. The verdict is striking.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I overestimated my grasp of what the Veda is really saying?
  • What humility does this require?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.43

↗
मां विधत्तेऽभिधत्ते मां विकल्प्यापोह्यते त्वहम् । एतावान् सर्ववेदार्थ: शब्द आस्थाय मां भिदाम् । मायामात्रमनूद्यान्ते प्रतिषिध्य प्रसीदति ॥ ४३ ॥
māṁ vidhatte ’bhidhatte māṁ
[maam vidhatte ’bhidhatte maam]
vikalpyāpohyate tv aham
[vikalpyaapohyate tv aham]
etāvān sarva-vedārthaḥ
[etaavaan sarva-vedaarthah]
śabda āsthāya māṁ bhidām
[shabda aasthaaya maam bhidaam]
māyā-mātram anūdyānte
[maayaa-maatram anoodyaante]
pratiṣidhya prasīdati
[pratishidhya praseedati]
mām — Me vidhatte — enjoins in sacrifice abhidhatte — designates as the object of worship mām — Me vikalpya — presented as alternate hypothesis apohyate — am refuted tu — also aham — I etāvān — thus sarva-veda — of all the Vedas arthaḥ — the meaning śabdaḥ — the transcendental sound vibration āsthāya — establishing mām — Me bhidām — material duality māyā-mātram — as simply illusion anūdya — describing elaborately in different aspects ante — ultimately pratiṣidhya — negating prasīdati — becomes satisfied.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māṁ vidhatte ’bhidhatte māṁ
mām
Me
vidhatte
enjoins in sacrifice
vikalpyāpohyate tv aham
etāvān sarva-vedārthaḥ
śabda āsthāya māṁ bhidām
abhidhatte
designates as the object of worship
mām
Me
vikalpya
presented as alternate hypothesis
māyā-mātram anūdyānte
pratiṣidhya prasīdati
apohyate
am refuted
tu
also
aham
I
etāvān
thus
sarva-veda
of all the Vedas
arthaḥ
the meaning
śabdaḥ
the transcendental sound vibration
āsthāya
establishing
mām
Me
bhidām
material duality
māyā-mātram
as simply illusion
anūdya
describing elaborately in different aspects
ante
ultimately
pratiṣidhya
negating
prasīdati
becomes satisfied.
I am the ritualistic sacrifice enjoined by the Vedas, and I am the worshipable Deity. It is I who am presented as various philosophical hypotheses, and it is I alone who am then refuted by philosophical analysis. The transcendental sound vibration thus establishes Me as the essential meaning of all Vedic knowledge. The Vedas, elaborately analyzing all material duality as nothing but My illusory potency, ultimately completely negate this duality and achieve their own satisfaction.

The Lord declared in the previous verse that He alone knows the ultimate purpose of the Vedas, and now the Lord reveals that He alone is the ultimate basis and purpose of all Vedic knowledge. The karma-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas prescribes ritualistic sacrifices for promotion to heaven. Such sacrifices are the Lord Himself. Similarly, the upāsanā-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas designates different demigods as objects of ritualistic worship, and these deities are not different from the Lord Himself, being expansions of the Lord’s body. In the jñāna-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas different philosophical methods of analysis are presented and refuted. Such knowledge, which analyzes the potency of the Supreme Lord, is not different from Him. Ultimately Lord Kṛṣṇa is everything, because everything is part and parcel of the Lord’s multipotencies. Although Vedic literature entices those absorbed in material duality to begin the Vedic way of life by offering them materially desirable rewards, the Vedas eventually refute all material duality by bringing one to the stage of God consciousness, wherein there is nothing different from the Supreme Lord.

Within the Vedic literature there are various injunctions stating that at a particular stage of life one should give up fruitive rituals and take to the path of knowledge. Similarly, other injunctions declare that a self-realized soul should give up the path of speculative knowledge and take directly to the shelter of the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead. But nowhere is there an injunction recommending that one give up the loving service of the Lord, because that is the eternal constitutional position of every living entity. Different philosophical theses are presented and rejected in the Vedas, since one who is progressing must give up each previous stage in the advancement of knowledge. For example, one who is addicted to sex enjoyment is taught to accept religious marriage and enjoy sex pleasure with his wife. Such ritualistic knowledge is to be given up when one attains the stage of detachment, whereupon one is recommended to take the renounced order of life. In that stage of life one is forbidden to see or speak with women. When, however, one reaches the perfection of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, wherein the Lord is manifest everywhere, one may engage all living entities, including women, in the loving service of the Lord without danger of spiritual falldown. Thus different injunctions based on progressive stages of spiritual vision are presented and refuted in Vedic literature. Since all such injunctions and processes are ultimately meant for the achievement of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, the loving service of the Lord, they are not different from Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself. The conditioned soul, therefore, should not prematurely stop his progressive march back home, back to Godhead, by foolishly mistaking an intermediate or preliminary stage of advancement as the actual goal of life. One must understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, is the source, maintenance and resting place of everything, and that every living entity is the Lord’s eternal servant. In this way one should continue on the Vedic path all the way back home, back to Godhead, for eternal life of bliss and knowledge.

Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Eleventh Canto, Twenty-first Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Lord Kṛṣṇa’s Explanation of the Vedic Path.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Vedas indicate bhakti as the action and indicate me as the meaning. I am the meaning of all the Vedas. I, as karma and jñāna, am proposed and rejected as alternatives. The Vedas, taking shelter of me, proposing karma and jñāna and then rejecting them as māyā, become happy by giving the devotees bliss. “Please tell me the answer.” Yes, certainly I will. The Vedas prescribe me. Bhakti is not different from my svarūpa. Thus the meaning is “The Vedas establish that bhakti to me is necessary.” The final goal of sacrifices and other actions is to produce bhakti for me. I have said dharmo mad-bhakti-kṛt prokto: actual religious principles are stated to be those that lead one to my devotional service. (SB 11.19.27) I am the meaning of all the Vedas. I am presented as an alternative and am refuted as an alternative. yogās trayo mayā proktā nṝṇāṁ śreyo-vidhitsayā jñānaṁ karma ca bhaktiś ca nopāyo ’nyo ’sti kutracit Because I desire that human beings may achieve perfection, I have presented three methods—the path of jñāna, the path of karma and the path of bhakti. Besides these three there no other means of elevation. SB 11.20.6 In the three kāṇḍas, karma, jñāna and bhakti are presented as alternatives. First I say “Do karma.” Then I say “Practice jñāna.” Then I say “Perform bhakti.” They are presented and rejected. First sakāma-karma is rejected in favor of niṣkāma-karma. Then when one rises to jñāna, niṣkāma-karma is rejected. When jñāna is perfected, jñāna should be rejected in order to attain me: jñānaṁ ca mayi sannyaset. (SB 11.19.1) But no scripture ever says that bhakti should be rejected at any time. The present verse says “I am rejected.” This means that, because karma and jñāna are rejected, I am rejected. The third person verb is poetic license. The Lord identifies himself as those processes of karma and jñāna (I am proposed as karma and jñāna and rejected as karma and jñāna), because these processes are also means of attaining him. The Lord has his spiritual and material forms. The material forms are rejected here. “Please explain this more clearly.” The Vedas take shelter of me, by recommending the process of bhakti, saying that other processes such as karma and jñāna are only māyā, since karma is in the three guṇas and jñāna, composed of vidyā, is in sattva-guṇa, until realizing ātmā. On finally rejecting the two processes, the Vedas become joyful. The Vedas give joy to the devotees through rasa flowing from the fruit of the sweet creeper of bhakti, beyond the material guṇas, in the form of realization of my sweetness. Thus the Vedas themselves become happy. Some explain the verse as follows. The Vedas prescribe me as the form of sacrifice in karma-kāṇḍa. They define me in devatḷa-kāṇḍa as the statements of the mantras. In jñāna-kāṇḍa, they propose that I am ether and other things, which are different from me, and then reject those ideas. This is the meaning of the Vedas. The Vedas, taking shelter of my spiritual form, reject other things as māyā, saying “not this, not this,” having completed their task. In this explanation however, when it says that all other things are rejected as māyā, the devotees, the tools used in bhakti, the abodes of the Lord and other related items, are not included, since they are not part of māyā. Thus ends the commentary on the Twenty-first Chapter of the Eleventh Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty-two Classification of Elements
The Lord is the ritualistic sacrifice, the worshipable Deity, the philosophical hypotheses, and even the refutation of them — sound vibration establishes Him as the essence of all. Even debate, dissolved, lands in Him.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I taking sides in a debate when both sides exist within Him?
  • How does this perspective change my conversation?
📝 My note