FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.21.2

स्वे स्वेऽधिकारे या निष्ठा स गुण: परिकीर्तित: । विपर्ययस्तु दोष: स्यादुभयोरेष निश्चय: ॥ २ ॥
sve sve ’dhikāre yā niṣṭhā
[sve sve ’dhikaare yaa nishthaa]
sa guṇaḥ parikīrtitaḥ
[sa gunah parikeertitah]
viparyayas tu doṣaḥ syād
[viparyayas tu doshah syaad]
ubhayor eṣa niścayaḥ
[ubhayor esha nishchayah]
sve sve — each in his own adhikāre — position yā — such niṣṭhā — steadiness saḥ — this guṇaḥ — piety parikīrtitaḥ — is declared to be viparyayaḥ — the opposite tu — indeed doṣaḥ — impiety syāt — is ubhayoḥ — of the two eṣaḥ — this niścayaḥ — the definite conclusion.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sve sve ’dhikāre yā niṣṭhā
sve sve
each in his own
sa guṇaḥ parikīrtitaḥ
viparyayas tu doṣaḥ syād
adhikāre
position
ubhayor eṣa niścayaḥ
yā
such
niṣṭhā
steadiness
saḥ
this
guṇaḥ
piety
parikīrtitaḥ
is declared to be
viparyayaḥ
the opposite
tu
indeed
doṣaḥ
impiety
syāt
is
ubhayoḥ
of the two
eṣaḥ
this
niścayaḥ
the definite conclusion.
Steadiness in one’s own position is declared to be actual piety, whereas deviation from one’s position is considered impiety. In this way the two are definitely ascertained.

In the previous verse Lord Kṛṣṇa explained that the path of spiritual progress begins with working without fruitive desires, advances to the stage of realized spiritual knowledge, and culminates in direct engagement in the devotional service of the Lord. Here the Lord emphasizes that a conditioned soul should not artificially disrupt the natural evolution of his Kṛṣṇa consciousness by deviating from those duties prescribed by the Lord Himself. In the lower stages of human life one is entangled in false identification with the gross material body and desires to execute material fruitive activities based on society, friendship and love. When such materialistic activities are offered in sacrifice to the Supreme Lord, one becomes situated in karma-yoga. By regulated sacrifice one gradually gives up the gross bodily concept of life and advances to the stage of realization of spiritual knowledge, whereby one understands oneself to be an eternal spirit soul completely different from the material body and mind. Feeling relief from the pangs of materialism one becomes very attached to one’s spiritual knowledge, and thus one is situated in the stage of jñāna-yoga. As the candidate further advances on the spiritual path, he understands himself to be part and parcel of the Supreme Soul, the Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa. He then sees that his conditional life as well as his spiritual knowledge was obtained from the Personality of Godhead, who awards the results of all types of activities, both pious and sinful. By directly engaging in the loving service of the Supreme Lord and understanding oneself to be the Lord’s eternal servant, one’s attachment evolves into pure love of Godhead. Thus one first gives up the lower stage of attachment to the material body and then subsequently gives up attachment to cultivation of spiritual knowledge. This relieves one of material life. Finally one recognizes the Lord Himself as the resting place of one’s eternal love and fully surrenders to God in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

Lord Kṛṣṇa explains in this verse that one who is still attached to the material body and mind cannot artificially give up the prescribed duties of karma-yoga. In the same way, one who is a spiritual neophyte, just beginning to realize the illusion of material life, should not artificially try to think of the Lord’s intimate pastimes twenty-four hours a day, imitating the stage of prema-bhakti. Rather, he should cultivate analytic knowledge of the material world, by which one gives up attachment to the material body and mind. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam we find many analytic descriptions of the material world, and they can free the conditioned soul from false identification with matter. One who has achieved the perfect stage of love of Godhead, however, being freed from all gross and subtle attachments to the material world, may give up the lower stages of karma-yoga and jñāna-yoga and engage directly in the Lord’s loving service.

In Chapter Nineteen, verse 45, Lord Kṛṣṇa states, guṇa-doṣa-dṛśir doṣo guṇas tūbhaya-varjitaḥ. One should not see material good and evil within a devotee of the Lord. Indeed, one becomes pious by giving up such mundane conceptions. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura points out that occasionally a neophyte devotee may be polluted by association with those enthusiastically executing fruitive activities and mental speculation. Such a devotee’s religious activities may be affected by mundane tendencies. Similarly, an ordinary person who observes the exalted status of a pure devotee sometimes externally imitates the devotee’s activities, considering himself to be on the same exalted platform of pure devotional service. These imperfect practitioners of bhakti-yoga are not exempt from criticism, since their fruitive activities, mental speculation and false prestige are material intrusions in the pure loving service of the Lord. A pure devotee engaged exclusively in the Lord’s service should not be criticized, but a devotee whose devotional service is mixed with material qualities may be corrected so that he can rise to the platform of pure devotional service. Innocent persons should not be misled by the mixed devotional service of those not engaged exclusively in the bhakti-yoga system, but those unable to fully engage in Kṛṣṇa consciousness should nevertheless not give up their regular prescribed duties, declaring them to be illusion. For example, one unable to fully engage in pure Kṛṣṇa consciousness should not give up his family, considering it an illusion, for by doing so he will fall into illicit sex life. Material piety and analytic knowledge of the material world must therefore be cultivated until one comes to the stage of directly practicing Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Being fixed according to one’s qualification is a good quality, and to be fixed in something not of one’s qualification is a bad quality. This is how good and bad are determined. “I asked you what a good quality is and what a bad quality is. You answered that it is a fault to see good and bad in the devotees and a good quality not to see good and bad in them. I have this doubt. If someone has faith in your topics and is qualified for pure bhakti, but by fate falls under the control of karmīs or jñānīs, follows them, and performs karma, distasteful as drinking medicine, or practices jñāna, is seeing fault in his bhakti a bad quality and not seeing fault a good quality? Moreover, if someone, a karmī or jñānī, does not obtain complete faith in bhakti since he does not obtain mercy of great devotees, but by seeing the excellence of a devotee, gives up his duties according to his qualification with a desire to attain such excellence and begins worshipping the Lord and announced that he is a devotee, should one see good qualities or bad qualities in that imposter, a cheater of the world?” Please hear about the nature of good and bad qualities. The jñānī fixed in his qualification for jñāna and the karmī fixed in his qualification for karma are approved as good. However, because both cannot give their results by themselves, karma and jñāna must be performed with a mixture of bhakti. Otherwise they do not give any result. naiṣkarmyam apy acyuta-bhāva-varjitaṁ na śobhate jñānam alaṁ nirañjanam Even the stage of jñāna without the bondage of karma, if devoid of bhakti to the Supreme Lord, is not glorious. SB 1.5.12 On the other hand, being fixed in bhakti, as is done by the śuddha-bhakta, is a good quality since bhakti has the power to give its own result. Bhakti should not be performed with any mixture of karma or jñāna, since those processes cannot give independent results anyway. dharmān santyajya yaḥ sarvān māṁ bhajeta sa tu sattamaḥ A person who, understanding good and bad aspects of dharma as taught by me, gives up all his duties and simply worships me is the best of all. SB 11.11.32 tasmān mad-bhakti-yuktasya yogino vai mad-ātmanaḥ na jñānaṁ na ca vairāgyaṁ prāyaḥ śreyo bhaved iha Therefore, for a devotee engaged in bhakti, with mind fixed on me, the cultivation of knowledge and renunciation is generally not beneficial for bhakti. SB 11.20.31 By this it is understood that if there is a mixture of karma or jñāna, pure bhakti disappears. To be fixed in the opposite, someone else’s qualification is fault. This is how good and bad are determined.
Real piety is steadiness in one's own position; deviation is impiety. The standard is internal-to-the-path, not external comparison.
Reflection Questions
  • What is my 'own position', and have I been steady in it?
  • Where do I judge others' positions instead of holding my own?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 21