FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

9.14 · King Purūravā Enchanted by Urvaśī

46 verses · 🖨 Class prep
A Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (14581 chars)

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Lord Parasurama, the fearsome avatara who annihilated the administrators with His axe, appeared in the Soma Vamsa (dynasty of the moon-god). Disgusted by their degradation, Parasurama annihilated the ksatriyas twenty- one times, after which He renounced all His weapons. He then entered the Mahendra mountains (where He still resides), worshipped by Siddhas, Charanas, and Gandharvas.

Previous Banishing Sita Next Pururava and Urvasi Last updated 1 year ago

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16)

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Lord Parasurama, the fearsome avatara who annihilated the administrators with His axe, appeared in the Soma Vamsa (dynasty of the moon-god). Disgusted by their degradation, Parasurama annihilated the ksatriyas twenty- one times, after which He renounced all His weapons. He then entered the Mahendra mountains (where He still resides), worshipped by Siddhas, Charanas, and Gandharvas.

Previous Banishing Sita Next Pururava and Urvasi Last updated 1 year ago

Avatara Annihilates Administrators

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Avatara Annihilates Administrators Chapter 15, 16 Sukadeva Goswami then described the descendants of Urvasi, in which lineage Satyavati appeared. Satyavati’s husband was the sage, Rcika Muni. Her father had asked him to donate 1,000 special horses as a dowry, which he successfully sourced from Varuna. Later, Satyavati and her mother both requested Rcika Muni to prepare an oblation so they could have a son. The sage prepared one oblation for a priestly ( brahmana ) son, and gave it to Satyavati, and the other oblation for a warrior ( ksatriya ) son, and gave that to her mother. Satyavati and her mother, however, switched the oblations, and Satyavati was thus destined to have a fierce, ksatriya son. When she pleaded that this be changed, he adjusted the benediction so that her grandson would become this fierce ksatriya . In time, she had a son named Jamadagni, who then had a son called Parasurama, the avatara of the Lord who would fiercely annihilate the deviant rulers of the universe. Sukadeva Goswami then narrated the events leading up to the mass killing. King Kartaviryarjuna had become extremely powerful, and even held the mighty Ravana captive at one point. When Kartaviryarjuna audaciously stole Jamadagni’s desire cow, Parasurama arrived in his capital and annihilated his armies. He confronted Kartaviryarjuna, cut off his 1,000 arms and then decapitated him. The cow was released and the news of his victory reached Jamadagni. His father disapproved of such violence and encouraged his son to atone for the sin by visiting the holy places. Parasurama thus travelled for one year. Later, Jamadagni detected that his wife had compromised her chastity. He ordered his sons to kill her, but they could not follow their father’s instruction. When Jamadagni issued the order to Parasurama, however, the fierce avatara killed all his brothers and his mother. Jamadagni was satisfied and asked his son to request any blessing. Parasurama then prayed that they all come back to life. Meanwhile, the sons of Kartaviryarjuna were still dismayed at their father’s death. In retaliation, they mercilessly killed Jamadagni. This heinous crime enraged Parasurama to no end. He launched a full-scale attack on the ksatriya clan, and began by killing all of Kartaviyarjuna’s sons. In total, Parasurama killed the ksatriyas twenty-one times, so that there were no warriors left! The mass slaughter caused rivers of blood and a mountain of heads. Later, when Parasurama joined the head of his father to the dead body, Jamadagni miraculously came back to life. Parasurama then renounced His weapons and entered the Mahendra mountains, where he continues to live even today.

Previous Pururava and Urvasi Next Heavy Handed Last updated 1 year ago

Heavy Handed

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Heavy Handed “Parasurama is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and his eternal mission is paritranaya sadhunam vinasaya ca duskrtam [ Bg. 4.8 ]—to protect the devotees and annihilate the miscreants. To kill all the sinful men is one among the tasks of the incarnation of Godhead. Lord Parasurama killed all the ksatriyas twenty-one times consecutively because they were disobedient to the brahminical culture. That the ksatriyas had killed his father was only a plea; the real fact is that because the ksatriyas , the ruling class, had become polluted, their position was inauspicious. Brahminical culture is enjoined in the sastra , especially in Bhagavad-gita ( catur-varnyam maya srstam guna-karma-vibhagasah [ Bg. 4.13 ]). According to the laws of nature, whether at the time of Parasurama or at the present, if the government becomes irresponsible and sinful, not caring for brahminical culture, there will certainly be an incarnation of God like Parasurama to create a devastation by fire, famine, pestilence or some other calamity.” ( SB 9.16.18 ) Srimad-Bhagavatam contains a variety of violent accounts, many of which describe the fierce acts of the Lord Himself. To the first-time reader it can be unnerving. Why is there so much hardcore violence in these narrations? Aren’t such vicious acts driven by the lower nature of lust, greed and anger? Why does the Supreme Lord have to resort to such fierce tactics to establish His way? Don’t such accounts leave the door open for misinterpretation and misuse by the immature? Could such narrations be fueling the religious violence that we see in the world today?

Previous Avatara Annihilates Administrators Next Play Fight Last updated 1 year ago

Avoiding Confrontation

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Heavy Handed Avoiding Confrontation Vedic culture prescribes a variety of options before one even begins to consider employing some level of aggression or violence. People often criticise Krishna for inciting Arjuna to fight in the Kuruksetra battle, positing that a nonviolent approach would be more in line with the spirituality He was presenting. A closer look, however, reveals that Krishna exhausted all other means of resolution before resorting to violence. That violence should be the last expression of assertiveness is illustrated by the exhaustive peace efforts that precede it. Sama (Conciliation) – first one must try to build bridges and see if an amicable agreement can be reached. When the Kauravas had usurped the kingdom of the Pandavas, Krishna came as a messenger and encouraged a settlement by which both families could reside together in harmony. He encouraged them to forget the past, and hoped the Kauravas would be won over by an amicable presentation in agreeable terms. Dama (Compensation) - if straightforward arguments are unsuccessful, one may present the case in diplomatic terms and ‘sell’ the idea to the other party. People are attracted by what’s in it for them, and on that basis, one can encourage someone towards a decision that has much broader and noble benefits. For example, when He went as a messenger of peace, Krishna suggested to the Kauravas that having allies like the Pandavas would put them in an invincible position in terms of global influence. Bheda (Influence) – if such logical arguments are unsuccessful, one may resort to trickery or subtle influence to bring about peace. This may involve dividing the inimical party in order to reduce their influence – as the dictum says, “Divide and conquer.” Krishna tried to influence the Kauravas by suggesting that since one person’s obstinacy would destroy the entire Kuru clan, it is entirely reasonable to forsake that person (Duryodhana) for a higher good. Danda (Action) – when all such means fail, one may well have to resort to force and physical aggression. Krishna warned the Kauravas that the Pandavas were a formidable alliance who were ready for a trial of arms. He explained that they would be quite competent to soundly defeat the Kauravas. When there was no other choice, Krishna fully encouraged the Pandavas to resolve the situation via the battle in Kuruksetra.

Previous Play Fight Next The Non-Violent Incarnation Last updated 1 year ago

Play Fight

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Heavy Handed Play Fight Here are some considerations when trying to digest the violent side of God: Attraction – Krishna’s activities are known as lila , or ‘divine play.’ They are eternal, full of bliss and knowledge, and create auspiciousness in every conceivable way. Even when there is conflict and battle, we should understand that these are not ordinary, mundane passions. As loving competition with friends, couples and families increases the sweetness of the relationship, Krishna, as rasaraja , the king of all relationships, knows how to bring everyone closer to Him. Transcendental violence has none of the detrimental side effects and harm that mundane violence generates, and such incidents draw everyone involved closer to Him – not just the participants but the observers too. Absorption – the presence of demons, and the subsequent prowess of Krishna in combating them, stirs an ocean of emotions in His devotees. As they fear for His safety, and gasp in wonder when He is attacked, they come closer and closer to Him in consciousness. To increase the sense of dependency, Krishna performs these pastimes, keeping devotees on the edge of their seats. Variation - In the spiritual world there are no demons, but only rumours of demons! Thus, when the Lord wants to experience a different type of exchange He comes to the material world and, while uplifting the universe and protecting His devotees, simultaneously experiences the act of fighting. Purification – just as different criminals are given different jail sentences, demons, who cause universal uproar on a mass scale, are corrected in different ways. A famous dictum states: “Spare the rod, spoil the child.” It’s actually the Lord’s mercy that He takes the time and trouble to carefully punish each demon appropriately, such that their heart will be purified and their consciousness refined. A certain level of violence is sometimes required because of the base mentality and layers of illusion covering these souls. Demons have a deranged mentality – out of everyone in this world, the desire to kill God is the worst! Therefore, Krishna relates to them accordingly. The depth of Krishna’s love, even in these situations, can only be appreciated when we simultaneously consider the length and breadth of the living entity’s existence. Instruction – to those of the future, and to each one of us, Krishna performs such violent acts to warn us of the fatal consequences of acting in a harmful or hurtful way while ‘nobody is watching.’ The Supreme Lord, protector of dharma and His devotees, is unable to tolerate any mistreatment and mischief caused towards them. Where good arguments fail, violence may need to be employed for a higher cause. Since the aggressive leaders had recklessly abused their positions and their subjects, a nonviolent approach would have been ineffective. Thus, Parasurama adopted an alternative response.

Previous Heavy Handed Next Avoiding Confrontation Last updated 1 year ago

The Non-Violent Incarnation

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Heavy Handed The Non-Violent Incarnation Interestingly, in Kali-yuga, Krishna comes in the non-violent form of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. He does not kill the demons ( asuras ) using weapons and violence, but rather kills the demoniac mentality ( asura-bhava ) through the sublime and joyful process of sankirtana . Once, when Sri Chaitanya did become furious at the mistreatment of His devotee, He exhibited His violent nature and awakened His Sudarshan Chakra. Nityananda Prabhu reminded Him of His mission to deliver the hopelessly fallen souls of the age, of whom Jagai and Madhai were classic examples. Ninety-nine percent of the population in Kali-yuga resemble these brothers, who, despite their high birth and cultural respectability, had become degraded and uncivilised in their behaviour. Sri Chaitanya thus withdrew His anger and bestowed His kind mercy upon the miscreant brothers, who vowed to reform their ways. The Srimad-Bhagavatam explains: “In the age of Kali, intelligent persons perform congregational chanting to worship the incarnation of Godhead who constantly sings the names of Krishna. Although His complexion is not blackish, He is Krishna Himself. He is accompanied by His associates, servants, weapons and confidential companions.” (SB 11.5.32) The verse indicates that Sri Chaitanya also appears with weapons ( astra ). What are those weapons? Some teachers explain the weapon is the holy name, which can penetrate anyone’s heart and create a powerful consciousness shift even in unwilling living entities. Others explain the weapons are His associates who exude compassion and love, and can transform people by their holy association. Some say that the molten golden complexion and unparalleled beauty of the Lord is His weapon. Simply by seeing that divine form people were naturally drawn towards Him.

Previous Avoiding Confrontation Next G – God From Goloka (17-24) Last updated 1 year ago

Pururava and Urvasi

A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Pururava and Urvasi Chapter 14 Having detailed the Surya Vamsa, Sukadeva Goswami next described the Soma Vamsa. Brahma’s son was Atri, and Atri’s son was Soma (the moon-god). Soma irreligiously united with Tara and begot Budha, who later begot Pururava (also known as Aila). Sukadeva Goswami then elaborated on his history. When the heavenly damsel, Urvasi, was attracted to Pururava, she spoke sweet words and united with him. Later, the Gandharvas stole the two lambs of Urvasi, and she angrily rebuked Pururava, who responded by immediately rescuing them. He returned triumphant but was undressed (since he had left in a rush). Seeing him return, Urvasi decided to leave him for good and thus disappeared. Pururava was overwhelmed with lamentation and repeatedly pleaded her to return. After enlightening him about the nature of materialistic women, Urvasi finally agreed to meet with him for one night a year. This arrangement frustrated the attached Pururava even more, and though the Gandharvas gave him another suitable companion, he abandoned her in dissatisfaction. He desperately tried different things to mitigate his burning desire. Once, he made two sticks from a tree and created a fire which satisfied his lusty desires and gave birth to a son. [ 29 ]

Previous A – Axe-Wielding Avatara (14-16) Next Avatara Annihilates Administrators Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.1

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच अथात: श्रुयतां राजन् वंश: सोमस्य पावन: । यस्मिन्नैलादयो भूपा: कीर्त्यन्ते पुण्यकीर्तय: ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
athātaḥ śrūyatāṁ rājan
[athaatah shrooyataam raajan]
vaṁśaḥ somasya pāvanaḥ
[vamshah somasya paavanah]
yasminn ailādayo bhūpāḥ
[yasminn ailaadayo bhoopaah]
kīrtyante puṇya-kīrtayaḥ
[keertyante punya-keertayah]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said atha — now (after hearing the history of the dynasty of the sun) ataḥ — therefore śrūyatām — just hear from me rājan — O King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit) vaṁśaḥ — the dynasty somasya — of the moon-god pāvanaḥ — which is purifying to hear about yasmin — in which (dynasty) aila-ādayaḥ — headed by Aila (Purūravā) bhūpāḥ — kings kīrtyante — are described puṇya-kīrtayaḥ — persons of whom it is glorious to hear.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
athātaḥ śrūyatāṁ rājan
atha
now (after hearing the history of the dynasty of the sun)
ataḥ
therefore
śrūyatām
just hear from me
rājan
O King (Mahārāja Parīkṣit)
vaṁśaḥ somasya pāvanaḥ
vaṁśaḥ
the dynasty
somasya
of the moon-god
pāvanaḥ
which is purifying to hear about
yasminn ailādayo bhūpāḥ
yasmin
in which (dynasty)
aila-ādayaḥ
headed by Aila (Purūravā)
bhūpāḥ
kings
kīrtyante puṇya-kīrtayaḥ
kīrtyante
are described
puṇya-kīrtayaḥ
persons of whom it is glorious to hear.
Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī said to Mahārāja Parīkṣit: O King, thus far you have heard the description of the dynasty of the sun-god. Now hear the most glorious and purifying description of the dynasty of the moon-god. This description mentions kings like Aila [Purūravā] of whom it is glorious to hear.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī: O King, thus far you have heard the description of the dynasty of the sun-god. Now hear the purifying description of the dynasty of the moon-god, in which famous kings like Aila (Purūravā) are glorified. The Fourteenth Chapter describes how Budha (Mercury) was born by the Moon in Tārā, the wife of his guru Bṛhaspati (Jupiter), and how his son Aila produced six sons in Urvaśī.
Śukadeva pivots from the Sūrya dynasty to the Soma dynasty — both 'most glorious and purifying.' Different lineages of devotional history both purify; we don't need to choose which great river to honor.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I unnecessarily ranking two equally valid spiritual streams against each other?
  • Whose lineage am I overlooking because I have already adopted another?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.2

↗
सहस्रशिरस: पुंसो नाभिह्रदसरोरुहात् । जातस्यासीत् सुतो धातुरत्रि: पितृसमो गुणै: ॥ २ ॥
sahasra-śirasaḥ puṁso
[sahasra-shirasah pumso]
nābhi-hrada-saroruhāt
[naabhi-hrada-saroruhaat]
jātasyāsīt suto dhātur
[jaatasyaaseet suto dhaatur]
atriḥ pitṛ-samo guṇaiḥ
[atrih pitri-samo gunaih]
sahasra-śirasaḥ — who has thousands of heads puṁsaḥ — of Lord Viṣṇu (Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu) nābhi-hrada-saroruhāt — from the lotus produced from the lake of the navel jātasya — who appeared āsīt — there was sutaḥ — a son dhātuḥ — of Lord Brahmā atriḥ — by the name Atri pitṛ-samaḥ — like his father guṇaiḥ — qualified.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sahasra-śirasaḥ puṁso
sahasra-śirasaḥ
who has thousands of heads
puṁsaḥ
of Lord Viṣṇu (Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu)
nābhi-hrada-saroruhāt
nābhi-hrada-saroruhāt
from the lotus produced from the lake of the navel
jātasyāsīt suto dhātur
jātasya
who appeared
āsīt
there was
sutaḥ
a son
dhātuḥ
of Lord Brahmā
atriḥ pitṛ-samo guṇaiḥ
atriḥ
by the name Atri
pitṛ-samaḥ
like his father
guṇaiḥ
qualified.
Lord Viṣṇu [Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu] is also known as Sahasra-śīrṣā Puruṣa. From the lake of His navel sprang a lotus, on which Lord Brahmā was generated. Atri, the son of Lord Brahmā, was as qualified as his father.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From the lake of navel of Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu sprang a lotus, on which Brahmā was generated. Atri, the son of Lord Brahmā, was as qualified as his father.
From Viṣṇu's navel comes the lotus, from the lotus Brahmā, and from Brahmā, Atri — as qualified as his father. Real spiritual succession passes on actual qualification, not merely social position.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom am I succeeding from in spirit — and am I living up to their qualification?
  • What qualification am I passing on to those who will succeed me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.3

↗
तस्य द‍ृग्भ्योऽभवत् पुत्र: सोमोऽमृतमय: किल । विप्रौषध्युडुगणानां ब्रह्मणा कल्पित: पति: ॥ ३ ॥
tasya dṛgbhyo ’bhavat putraḥ
[tasya drigbhyo ’bhavat putrah]
somo ’mṛtamayaḥ kila
[somo ’mritamayah kila]
viprauṣadhy-uḍu-gaṇānāṁ
[vipraushadhy-udu-ganaanaam]
brahmaṇā kalpitaḥ patiḥ
[brahmanaa kalpitah patih]
tasya — of him, Atri, the son of Brahmā dṛgbhyaḥ — from the tears of jubilation from the eyes abhavat — was born putraḥ — a son somaḥ — the moon-god amṛta-mayaḥ — full of soothing rays kila — indeed vipra — of the brāhmaṇas oṣadhi — of the drugs uḍu-gaṇānām — and of the luminaries brahmaṇā — by Lord Brahmā kalpitaḥ — was appointed or designated patiḥ — the supreme director.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya dṛgbhyo ’bhavat putraḥ
tasya
of him, Atri, the son of Brahmā
dṛgbhyaḥ
from the tears of jubilation from the eyes
abhavat
was born
putraḥ
a son
somo ’mṛtamayaḥ kila
somaḥ
the moon-god
amṛta-mayaḥ
full of soothing rays
kila
indeed
viprauṣadhy-uḍu-gaṇānāṁ
vipra
of the brāhmaṇas
oṣadhi
of the drugs
uḍu-gaṇānām
and of the luminaries
brahmaṇā kalpitaḥ patiḥ
brahmaṇā
by Lord Brahmā
kalpitaḥ
was appointed or designated
patiḥ
the supreme director.
From Atri’s tears of jubilation was born a son named Soma, the moon, who was full of soothing rays. Lord Brahmā appointed him the director of the brāhmaṇas, drugs and luminaries.

According to the Vedic description, Soma, the moon-god, was born from the mind of the Supreme Personality of Godhead ( candramā manaso jātaḥ ). But here we find that Soma was born from the tears in the eyes of Atri. This appears contradictory to the Vedic information, but actually it is not, for this birth of the moon is understood to have taken place in another millennium. When tears appear in the eyes because of jubilation, the tears are soothing. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura says, dṛgbhya ānandāśrubhya ata evāmṛtamayaḥ: “Here the word dṛgbhyaḥ means ‘from tears of jubilation.’ Therefore the moon-god is called amṛtamayaḥ, ‘full of soothing rays.’” In the Fourth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (4.1.15) we find this verse:

atreḥ patny anasūyā trīṣ jajñe suyaśasaḥ sutān dattaṁ durvāsasaṁ somam ātmeśa-brahma-sambhavān

This verse describes that Anasūyā, the wife of Atri Ṛṣi, bore three sons — Soma, Durvāsā and Dattātreya. It is said that at the time of conception Anasūyā was impregnated by the tears of Atri.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Atri's tears of jubilation was born a son named Soma, the moon, who was full of soothing rays. Brahmā appointed him the director of the brāhmaṇas, medicinal herbs and the stars. Dṛgbhyaḥ means “from tears of joy.” Therefore the moon is composed of amṛta. Another version has dṛśaḥ. atreḥ patny anasūyā trīṣ jajñe suyaśasaḥ sutān dattaṁ durvāsasaṁ somam ātmeśa-brahma-sambhavān Anasūyā, the wife of Atri Muni, gave birth to three very famous sons—Soma, Dattātreya and Durvāsā. Soma was a partial representation of Brahmā, Dattātreya was a partial representation of Viṣṇu, and Durvāsā was a partial representation of Śiva. SB 4.1.15 Some say that Anasūyā again gave birth to the Moon through his tears. Others say that at the time of conception he impregnated his wife with his tears of joy. Others say that her son is called his son in this verse though he actually was born from her.
Soma, born from Atri's tears of jubilation, is appointed director of brāhmaṇas, drugs, and luminaries. Even tears of joy can give rise to whole spheres of responsibility — emotion sincerely offered to the Lord bears unexpected fruit.
Reflection Questions
  • When did I last weep tears of jubilation in connection with the Lord?
  • What sphere of responsibility might be born from spiritual emotion I have not allowed to flow?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.4

↗
सोऽयजद् राजसूयेन विजित्य भुवनत्रयम् । पत्नीं बृहस्पतेर्दर्पात् तारां नामाहरद् बलात् ॥ ४ ॥
so ’yajad rājasūyena
[so ’yajad raajasooyena]
vijitya bhuvana-trayam
[vijitya bhuvana-trayam]
patnīṁ bṛhaspater darpāt
[patneem brihaspater darpaat]
tārāṁ nāmāharad balāt
[taaraam naamaaharad balaat]
saḥ — he, Soma ayajat — performed rājasūyena — the sacrifice known as Rājasūya vijitya — after conquering bhuvana-trayam — the three worlds (Svarga, Martya and Pātāla) patnīm — the wife bṛhaspateḥ — of Bṛhaspati, the spiritual master of the demigods darpāt — out of pride tārām — Tārā nāma — by name aharat — took away balāt — by force.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’yajad rājasūyena
saḥ
he, Soma
vijitya bhuvana-trayam
ayajat
performed
patnīṁ bṛhaspater darpāt
tārāṁ nāmāharad balāt
rājasūyena
the sacrifice known as Rājasūya
vijitya
after conquering
bhuvana-trayam
the three worlds (Svarga, Martya and Pātāla)
patnīm
the wife
bṛhaspateḥ
of Bṛhaspati, the spiritual master of the demigods
darpāt
out of pride
tārām
Tārā
nāma
by name
aharat
took away
balāt
by force.
After conquering the three worlds [the upper, middle and lower planetary systems], Soma, the moon-god, performed a great sacrifice known as the Rājasūya-yajña. Because he was very much puffed up, he forcibly kidnapped Bṛhaspati’s wife, whose name was Tārā.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After conquering the three worlds, the moon-god performed a Rājasūya sacrifice. Because of pride, he kidnapped Bṛhaspati's wife, Tārā.
Soma, puffed up after conquering the three worlds, kidnaps Bṛhaspati's wife Tārā. Sudden success without inner growth is dangerous — material victories often unlock our worst behaviors next.
Reflection Questions
  • Which recent success of mine is at risk of unlocking my worst tendencies?
  • Where have I 'conquered three worlds' in small ways and immediately overreached?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.5

↗
यदा स देवगुरुणा याचितोऽभीक्ष्णशो मदात् । नात्यजत् तत्कृते जज्ञे सुरदानवविग्रह: ॥ ५ ॥
yadā sa deva-guruṇā
[yadaa sa deva-gurunaa]
yācito ’bhīkṣṇaśo madāt
[yaachito ’bheekshnasho madaat]
nātyajat tat-kṛte jajñe
[naatyajat tat-krite jajne]
sura-dānava-vigrahaḥ
[sura-daanava-vigrahah]
yadā — when saḥ — he (Soma, the moon-god) deva-guruṇā — by the spiritual master of the demigods, Bṛhaspati yācitaḥ — was begged abhīkṣṇaśaḥ — again and again madāt — because of false pride na — not atyajat — did deliver tat-kṛte — because of this jajñe — there was sura-dānava — between the demigods and the demons vigrahaḥ — a fight.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadā sa deva-guruṇā
yadā
when
saḥ
he (Soma, the moon-god)
deva-guruṇā
by the spiritual master of the demigods, Bṛhaspati
yācito ’bhīkṣṇaśo madāt
yācitaḥ
was begged
abhīkṣṇaśaḥ
again and again
madāt
because of false pride
nātyajat tat-kṛte jajñe
na
not
atyajat
did deliver
tat-kṛte
because of this
jajñe
there was
sura-dānava-vigrahaḥ
sura-dānava
between the demigods and the demons
vigrahaḥ
a fight.
Although requested again and again by Bṛhaspati, the spiritual master of the demigods, Soma did not return Tārā. This was due to his false pride. Consequently, a fight ensued between the demigods and the demons.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Although requested again and again by Bṛhaspati, the guru of the devatās, Soma did not return Tārā out of pride. Consequently, a fight ensued between the devatās and the demons.
Despite the guru's repeated requests, Soma refuses to return Tārā. False pride can override every reasonable plea — and when even sound voices cannot recover us, war becomes inevitable.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose repeated reasonable request am I currently rebuffing?
  • What 'war' is brewing in my life because I will not back down?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.6

↗
शुक्रो बृहस्पतेर्द्वेषादग्रहीत् सासुरोडुपम् । हरो गुरुसुतं स्‍नेहात् सर्वभूतगणावृत: ॥ ६ ॥
śukro bṛhaspater dveṣād
[shukro brihaspater dveshaad]
agrahīt sāsuroḍupam
[agraheet saasurodupam]
haro guru-sutaṁ snehāt
[haro guru-sutam snehaat]
sarva-bhūta-gaṇāvṛtaḥ
[sarva-bhoota-ganaavritah]
śukraḥ — the demigod named Śukra bṛhaspateḥ — unto Bṛhaspati dveṣāt — because of enmity agrahīt — took sa-asura — with the demons uḍupam — the side of the moon-god haraḥ — Lord Śiva guru-sutam — the side of his spiritual master’s son snehāt — because of affection sarva-bhūta-gaṇa-āvṛtaḥ — accompanied by all kinds of ghosts and hobgoblins.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śukro bṛhaspater dveṣād
śukraḥ
the demigod named Śukra
bṛhaspateḥ
unto Bṛhaspati
dveṣāt
because of enmity
agrahīt sāsuroḍupam
agrahīt
took
sa-asura
with the demons
uḍupam
the side of the moon-god
haro guru-sutaṁ snehāt
haraḥ
Lord Śiva
guru-sutam
the side of his spiritual master’s son
snehāt
because of affection
sarva-bhūta-gaṇāvṛtaḥ
sarva-bhūta-gaṇa-āvṛtaḥ
accompanied by all kinds of ghosts and hobgoblins.
Because of enmity between Bṛhaspati and Śukra, Śukra took the side of the moon-god and was joined by the demons. But Lord Śiva, because of affection for the son of his spiritual master, joined the side of Bṛhaspati and was accompanied by all the ghosts and hobgoblins.

The moon-god is one of the demigods, but to fight against the other demigods he took the assistance of the demons. Śukra, being an enemy of Bṛhaspati, also joined the moon-god to retaliate in wrath against Bṛhaspati. To counteract this situation, Lord Śiva, who was affectionate toward Bṛhaspati, joined Bṛhaspati. The father of Bṛhaspati was Aṅgirā, from whom Lord Śiva had received knowledge. Therefore Lord Śiva had some affection for Bṛhaspati and joined his side in this fight. Śrīdhara Svāmī remarks, aṅgirasaḥ sakāśāt prāpta-vidyo hara iti prasiddhaḥ: “Lord Śiva is well known to have received knowledge from Aṅgirā.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of enmity between Bṛhaspati and Śukra, Śukra (guru of the demons) took the side of the moon-god and was joined by the demons. But Śiva, because of affection for the son of his guru, joined the side of Bṛhaspati and was accompanied by all the ghosts and hobgoblins. Śukra sided with the moon along with the demons. The sandhi is poetic license. Śiva obtained knowledge from Aṅgirā, son of Bṛhaspati, according to Śrīdhara Svāmī.
Old enmities sort the sides — Śukra with the demons against Bṛhaspati, Śiva with Bṛhaspati out of guru-loyalty. Loyalty to one's guru's son can land us in fights we never chose, while old grudges quietly recruit us for the wrong team.
Reflection Questions
  • Which old grudge of mine is currently steering me into a fight I would not otherwise enter?
  • Whose loyalty is showing up for me even when the issue isn't theirs?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.7

↗
सर्वदेवगणोपेतो महेन्द्रो गुरुमन्वयात् । सुरासुरविनाशोऽभूत् समरस्तारकामय: ॥ ७ ॥
sarva-deva-gaṇopeto
[sarva-deva-ganopeto]
mahendro gurum anvayāt
[mahendro gurum anvayaat]
surāsura-vināśo ’bhūt
[suraasura-vinaasho ’bhoot]
samaras tārakāmayaḥ
[samaras taarakaamayah]
sarva-deva-gaṇa — by all the different demigods upetaḥ — joined mahendraḥ — Mahendra, the King of heaven, Indra gurum — his spiritual master anvayāt — followed sura — of the demigods asura — and of the demons vināśaḥ — causing destruction abhūt — there was samaraḥ — a fight tārakā-mayaḥ — simply because of Tārā, a woman, the wife of Bṛhaspati.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sarva-deva-gaṇopeto
sarva-deva-gaṇa
by all the different demigods
upetaḥ
joined
mahendro gurum anvayāt
mahendraḥ
Mahendra, the King of heaven, Indra
gurum
his spiritual master
anvayāt
followed
surāsura-vināśo ’bhūt
sura
of the demigods
asura
and of the demons
vināśaḥ
causing destruction
abhūt
there was
samaras tārakāmayaḥ
samaraḥ
a fight
tārakā-mayaḥ
simply because of Tārā, a woman, the wife of Bṛhaspati.
King Indra, accompanied by all kinds of demigods, joined the side of Bṛhaspati. Thus there was a great fight, destroying both demons and demigods, only for the sake of Tārā, Bṛhaspati’s wife.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Indra, accompanied by devatās, joined the side of Bṛhaspati. Thus there was a great fight, destroying both demons and devatās, only for the sake of Tārā, Bṛhaspati's wife.
Demigods and demons destroy each other 'only for the sake of Tārā.' Mass devastation often begins with a single unyielded attachment of one influential person.
Reflection Questions
  • What single attachment of mine, unyielded, might be driving wider damage than I see?
  • Where could one act of letting go save many people from related conflicts?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.8

↗
निवेदितोऽथाङ्गिरसा सोमं निर्भर्त्स्य विश्वकृत् । तारां स्वभर्त्रे प्रायच्छदन्तर्वत्नीमवैत् पति: ॥ ८ ॥
nivedito ’thāṅgirasā
[nivedito ’thaangirasaa]
somaṁ nirbhartsya viśva-kṛt
[somam nirbhartsya vishva-krit]
tārāṁ sva-bhartre prāyacchad
[taaraam sva-bhartre praayachchad]
antarvatnīm avait patiḥ
[antarvatneem avait patih]
niveditaḥ — being fully informed atha — thus aṅgirasā — by Aṅgirā Muni somam — the moon-god nirbhartsya — chastising severely viśva-kṛt — Lord Brahmā tārām — Tārā, the wife of Bṛhaspati sva-bhartre — unto her husband prāyacchat — delivered antarvatnīm — pregnant avait — could understand patiḥ — the husband (Bṛhaspati).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nivedito ’thāṅgirasā
niveditaḥ
being fully informed
somaṁ nirbhartsya viśva-kṛt
tārāṁ sva-bhartre prāyacchad
antarvatnīm avait patiḥ
atha
thus
aṅgirasā
by Aṅgirā Muni
somam
the moon-god
nirbhartsya
chastising severely
viśva-kṛt
Lord Brahmā
tārām
Tārā, the wife of Bṛhaspati
sva-bhartre
unto her husband
prāyacchat
delivered
antarvatnīm
pregnant
avait
could understand
patiḥ
the husband (Bṛhaspati).
When Lord Brahmā was fully informed by Aṅgirā about the entire incident, he severely chastised the moon-god, Soma. Thus Lord Brahmā delivered Tārā to her husband, who could then understand that she was pregnant.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Brahmā was fully informed by Aṅgirā about the entire incident, he severely chastised the moon-god, Soma. Brahmā delivered Tārā to her husband, who could then understand that she was pregnant. Brahmā scolded the moon, took Tārā from him, and gave her to Bṛhaspati. Bṛhaspati understood that she was pregnant.
Brahmā chastises Soma severely and delivers Tārā back. Senior intervention — when finally accepted — can resolve catastrophes that escalated only because junior parties refused to yield earlier.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose senior intervention have I been avoiding in a conflict I should have brought up sooner?
  • Could I be that senior, willing to enter someone else's mess, today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.9

↗
त्यज त्यजाशु दुष्प्रज्ञे मत्क्षेत्रादाहितं परै: । नाहं त्वां भस्मसात् कुर्यां स्त्रियं सान्तानिकेऽसति ॥ ९ ॥
tyaja tyajāśu duṣprajñe
[tyaja tyajaashu dushprajne]
mat-kṣetrād āhitaṁ paraiḥ
[mat-kshetraad aahitam paraih]
nāhaṁ tvāṁ bhasmasāt kuryāṁ
[naaham tvaam bhasmasaat kuryaam]
striyaṁ sāntānike ’sati
[striyam saantaanike ’sati]
tyaja — deliver tyaja — deliver āśu — immediately duṣprajñe — you foolish woman mat-kṣetrāt — from the womb meant for me to impregnate āhitam — begotten paraiḥ — by others na — not aham — I tvām — you bhasmasāt — burnt to ashes kuryām — shall make striyam — because you are a woman sāntānike — wanting a child asati — although you are unchaste.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tyaja tyajāśu duṣprajñe
tyaja
deliver
tyaja
deliver
āśu
immediately
duṣprajñe
you foolish woman
mat-kṣetrād āhitaṁ paraiḥ
mat-kṣetrāt
from the womb meant for me to impregnate
āhitam
begotten
paraiḥ
by others
nāhaṁ tvāṁ bhasmasāt kuryāṁ
na
not
aham
I
tvām
you
bhasmasāt
burnt to ashes
kuryām
shall make
striyaṁ sāntānike ’sati
striyam
because you are a woman
sāntānike
wanting a child
asati
although you are unchaste.
Bṛhaspati said: You foolish woman, your womb, which was meant for me to impregnate, has been impregnated by someone other than me. Immediately deliver your child! Immediately deliver it! Be assured that after the child is delivered, I shall not burn you to ashes. I know that although you are unchaste, you wanted a son. Therefore I shall not punish you.

Tārā was married to Bṛhaspati, and therefore as a chaste woman she should have been impregnated by him. But instead she preferred to be impregnated by Soma, the moon-god, and therefore she was unchaste. Although Bṛhaspati accepted Tārā from Brahmā, when he saw that she was pregnant he wanted her to deliver a son immediately. Tārā certainly very much feared her husband, and she thought she might be punished after giving birth. Thus Bṛhaspati assured her that he would not punish her, for although she was unchaste and had become pregnant illicitly, he wanted a son.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O foolish woman! Your womb, which was meant for me to impregnate, has been impregnated by someone other than me. Immediately deliver your child! Be assured that after the child is delivered, I shall not burn you to ashes, though you are unchaste, since you are a woman wanting a son. Bṛhaspati spoke. Deliver the child produced by another from the womb which is meant for my children. But she feared that when the child is born, he would turn her to ashes. No, since you desired a son, I desire you to have the son. Another version has sāntānike in the vocative instead of locative.
Bṛhaspati spares Tārā's life but demands she immediately deliver the child. He recognizes the offense, withholds the harshest reaction, and yet does not pretend nothing happened. Mature mercy is not denial.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I conflate forgiveness with pretending the offense did not occur?
  • How can I extend mercy without rewriting reality?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.10

↗
तत्याज व्रीडिता तारा कुमारं कनकप्रभम् । स्पृहामाङ्गिरसश्चक्रे कुमारे सोम एव च ॥ १० ॥
tatyāja vrīḍitā tārā
[tatyaaja vreeditaa taaraa]
kumāraṁ kanaka-prabham
[kumaaram kanaka-prabham]
spṛhām āṅgirasaś cakre
[sprihaam aangirasash chakre]
kumāre soma eva ca
[kumaare soma eva cha]
tatyāja — gave delivery vrīḍitā — being very much ashamed tārā — Tārā, the wife of Bṛhaspati kumāram — to a child kanaka-prabham — having a bodily effulgence like gold spṛhām — aspiration āṅgirasaḥ — Bṛhaspati cakre — made kumāre — unto the child somaḥ — the moon-god eva — indeed ca — also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatyāja vrīḍitā tārā
tatyāja
gave delivery
vrīḍitā
being very much ashamed
tārā
Tārā, the wife of Bṛhaspati
kumāraṁ kanaka-prabham
kumāram
to a child
kanaka-prabham
having a bodily effulgence like gold
spṛhām āṅgirasaś cakre
spṛhām
aspiration
āṅgirasaḥ
Bṛhaspati
cakre
made
kumāre soma eva ca
kumāre
unto the child
somaḥ
the moon-god
eva
indeed
ca
also.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: By Bṛhaspati’s order, Tārā, who was very much ashamed, immediately gave birth to the child, who was very beautiful, with a golden bodily hue. Both Bṛhaspati and the moon-god, Soma, desired the beautiful child.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By Bṛhaspati's order, Tārā, who was ashamed, gave birth to the child with a golden bodily hue. Both Bṛhaspati and the moon-god desired the child.
Both Bṛhaspati and Soma want the beautiful golden child. Children of disputed parentage become objects of competing claims — and the truth has not yet been spoken.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose welfare is currently the object of competing claims in my circle, and is the truth being spoken?
  • Where am I asserting ownership of an outcome I should let the truth decide?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.11

↗
ममायं न तवेत्युच्चैस्तस्मिन् विवदमानयो: । पप्रच्छुऋर्षयो देवा नैवोचे व्रीडिता तु सा ॥ ११ ॥
mamāyaṁ na tavety uccais
[mamaayam na tavety uchchais]
tasmin vivadamānayoḥ
[tasmin vivadamaanayoh]
papracchur ṛṣayo devā
[paprachchur rishayo devaa]
naivoce vrīḍitā tu sā
[naivoche vreeditaa tu saa]
mama — mine ayam — this (child) na — not tava — yours iti — thus uccaiḥ — very loudly tasmin — for the child vivadamānayoḥ — when the two parties were fighting papracchuḥ — inquired (from Tārā) ṛṣayaḥ — all the saintly persons devāḥ — all the demigods na — not eva — indeed uce — said anything vrīḍitā — being ashamed tu — indeed sā — Tārā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mamāyaṁ na tavety uccais
mama
mine
ayam
this (child)
na
not
tava
yours
tasmin vivadamānayoḥ
papracchur ṛṣayo devā
naivoce vrīḍitā tu sā
iti
thus
uccaiḥ
very loudly
tasmin
for the child
vivadamānayoḥ
when the two parties were fighting
papracchuḥ
inquired (from Tārā)
ṛṣayaḥ
all the saintly persons
devāḥ
all the demigods
na
not
eva
indeed
uce
said anything
vrīḍitā
being ashamed
tu
indeed
sā
Tārā.
Fighting again broke out between Bṛhaspati and the moon-god, both of whom claimed, “This is my child, not yours!” All the saints and demigods present asked Tārā whose child the newborn baby actually was, but because she was ashamed she could not immediately answer.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A quarrel started between Bṛhaspati and the moon-god, both of whom claimed, "This is my child, not yours!" All the sages and devatās present asked Tārā whose child the newborn baby actually was, but because she was ashamed she said nothing.
Asked to identify the father, Tārā cannot answer for shame. Shame, however human, can lock us out of the truth that would actually resolve the situation.
Reflection Questions
  • What shame is currently preventing me from naming a truth that needs to be spoken?
  • Where could a private confession to one safe person free the larger situation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.12

↗
कुमारो मातरं प्राह कुपितोऽलीकलज्जया । किं न वचस्यसद् वृत्ते आत्मावद्यं वदाशु मे ॥ १२ ॥
kumāro mātaraṁ prāha
[kumaaro maataram praaha]
kupito ’līka-lajjayā
[kupito ’leeka-lajjayaa]
kiṁ na vacasy asad-vṛtte
[kim na vachasy asad-vritte]
ātmāvadyaṁ vadāśu me
[aatmaavadyam vadaashu me]
kumāraḥ — the child mātaram — unto his mother prāha — said kupitaḥ — being very angry alīka — unnecessary lajjayā — with shame kim — why na — not vacasi — you say asat-vṛtte — O unchaste woman ātma-avadyam — the fault you have committed vada — say āśu — immediately me — unto me.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kumāro mātaraṁ prāha
kumāraḥ
the child
mātaram
unto his mother
prāha
said
kupito ’līka-lajjayā
kupitaḥ
being very angry
alīka
unnecessary
lajjayā
with shame
kiṁ na vacasy asad-vṛtte
kim
why
na
not
vacasi
you say
asat-vṛtte
O unchaste woman
ātmāvadyaṁ vadāśu me
ātma-avadyam
the fault you have committed
vada
say
āśu
immediately
me
unto me.
The child then became very angry and demanded that his mother immediately tell the truth. “You unchaste woman,” he said, “what is the use of your unnecessary shame? Why do you not admit your fault? Immediately tell me about your faulty behavior.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The child then became very angry and said, "O unchaste woman! What is the use of your unnecessary shame? Why do you not admit your fault? Immediately speak." Why do you not say your fault (avadyam)?
The newborn child himself angrily demands his mother tell the truth. Sometimes the very next generation forces the honesty the previous one keeps avoiding.
Reflection Questions
  • What honesty is the next generation likely to demand of me?
  • Could I speak that truth now, before I am pressed into it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.13

↗
ब्रह्मा तां रह आहूय समप्राक्षीच्च सान्‍त्वयन् । सोमस्येत्याह शनकै: सोमस्तं तावदग्रहीत् ॥ १३ ॥
brahmā tāṁ raha āhūya
[brahmaa taam raha aahooya]
samaprākṣīc ca sāntvayan
[samapraaksheech cha saantvayan]
somasyety āha śanakaiḥ
[somasyety aaha shanakaih]
somas taṁ tāvad agrahīt
[somas tam taavad agraheet]
brahmā — Lord Brahmā tām — unto her, Tārā rahaḥ — in a secluded place āhūya — putting her samaprākṣīt — inquired in detail ca — and sāntvayan — pacifying somasya — this son belongs to Soma, the moon-god iti — thus āha — she replied śanakaiḥ — very slowly somaḥ — Soma tam — the child tāvat — immediately agrahīt — took charge of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
brahmā tāṁ raha āhūya
brahmā
Lord Brahmā
tām
unto her, Tārā
rahaḥ
in a secluded place
āhūya
putting her
samaprākṣīc ca sāntvayan
samaprākṣīt
inquired in detail
ca
and
sāntvayan
pacifying
somasyety āha śanakaiḥ
somasya
this son belongs to Soma, the moon-god
somas taṁ tāvad agrahīt
iti
thus
āha
she replied
śanakaiḥ
very slowly
somaḥ
Soma
tam
the child
tāvat
immediately
agrahīt
took charge of.
Lord Brahmā then brought Tārā to a secluded place, and after pacifying her he asked to whom the child actually belonged. She replied very slowly, “This is the son of Soma, the moon-god.” Then the moon-god immediately took charge of the child.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Brahmā, calling Tārā to a secluded place, calmed her and then asked her. Eventually she admitted it was Soma’s child, and Soma then took the child. Rahaḥ means alone.
Brahmā gently takes Tārā aside, pacifies her, and only then asks. Truth-telling requires safe space — public demands rarely produce honest answers.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom have I demanded honesty from in public when the same question in private would have worked?
  • Where could I make space for someone to confess without losing face?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.14

↗
तस्यात्मयोनिरकृत बुध इत्यभिधां नृप । बुद्ध्या गम्भीरया येन पुत्रेणापोडुराण्मुदम् ॥ १४ ॥
tasyātma-yonir akṛta
[tasyaatma-yonir akrita]
budha ity abhidhāṁ nṛpa
[budha ity abhidhaam nripa]
buddhyā gambhīrayā yena
[buddhyaa gambheerayaa yena]
putreṇāpoḍurāṇ mudam
[putrenaapoduraan mudam]
tasya — of the child ātma-yoniḥ — Lord Brahmā akṛta — made budhaḥ — Budha iti — thus abhidhām — the name nṛpa — O King Parīkṣit buddhyā — by intelligence gambhīrayā — very deeply situated yena — by whom putreṇa — by such a son āpa — he got uḍurāṭ — the moon-god mudam — jubilation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasyātma-yonir akṛta
tasya
of the child
ātma-yoniḥ
Lord Brahmā
akṛta
made
budha ity abhidhāṁ nṛpa
budhaḥ
Budha
iti
thus
abhidhām
the name
nṛpa
O King Parīkṣit
buddhyā gambhīrayā yena
buddhyā
by intelligence
gambhīrayā
very deeply situated
yena
by whom
putreṇāpoḍurāṇ mudam
putreṇa
by such a son
āpa
he got
uḍurāṭ
the moon-god
mudam
jubilation.
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, when Lord Brahmā saw that the child was deeply intelligent, he gave the child the name Budha. The moon-god, the ruler of the stars, enjoyed great jubilation because of this son.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Because of the great intelligence of the child, Brahmā called him Budha. The moon-god, the ruler of the stars, enjoyed great jubilation because of this son.
Brahmā names the deeply intelligent child Budha — and Soma rejoices over a son born of disputed circumstances. The Lord's arrangement allows even messily-born children to be brilliant and beloved.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'messy' origin am I letting overshadow their actual brilliance?
  • What did the Lord redeem out of my own complicated beginnings?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.15-16

↗
तत: पुरूरवा जज्ञे इलायां य उदाहृत: । तस्य रूपगुणौदार्यशीलद्रविणविक्रमान् ॥ १५ ॥ श्रुत्वोर्वशीन्द्रभवने गीयमानान् सुरर्षिणा । तदन्तिकमुपेयाय देवी स्मरशरार्दिता ॥ १६ ॥
tataḥ purūravā jajñe
[tatah purooravaa jajne]
ilāyāṁ ya udāhṛtaḥ
[ilaayaam ya udaahritah]
tasya rūpa-guṇaudārya-
[tasya roopa-gunaudaarya-]
śīla-draviṇa-vikramān
[sheela-dravina-vikramaan]
śrutvorvaśīndra-bhavane
[shrutvorvasheendra-bhavane]
gīyamānān surarṣiṇā
[geeyamaanaan surarshinaa]
tad-antikam upeyāya
[tad-antikam upeyaaya]
devī smara-śarārditā
[devee smara-sharaarditaa]
tataḥ — from him (Budha) purūravāḥ — the son named Purūravā jajñe — was born ilāyām — in the womb of Ilā yaḥ — one who udāhṛtaḥ — has already been described (in the beginning of the Ninth Canto) tasya — his (Purūravā’s) rūpa — beauty guṇa — qualities audārya — magnanimity śīla — behavior draviṇa — wealth vikramān — power śrutvā — by hearing urvaśī — the celestial woman named Urvaśī indra-bhavane — in the court of King Indra gīyamānān — when they were being described sura-ṛṣiṇā — by Nārada tat-antikam — near him upeyāya — approached devī — Urvaśī smara-śara — by the arrows of Cupid arditā — being stricken.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ purūravā jajñe
tataḥ
from him (Budha)
purūravāḥ
the son named Purūravā
jajñe
was born
ilāyāṁ ya udāhṛtaḥ
ilāyām
in the womb of Ilā
yaḥ
one who
udāhṛtaḥ
has already been described (in the beginning of the Ninth Canto)
tasya rūpa-guṇaudārya-
tasya
his (Purūravā’s)
rūpa
beauty
guṇa
qualities
audārya
magnanimity
śīla-draviṇa-vikramān
śīla
behavior
draviṇa
wealth
vikramān
power
śrutvorvaśīndra-bhavane
śrutvā
by hearing
gīyamānān surarṣiṇā
urvaśī
the celestial woman named Urvaśī
indra-bhavane
in the court of King Indra
gīyamānān
when they were being described
sura-ṛṣiṇā
by Nārada
tad-antikam upeyāya
tat-antikam
near him
upeyāya
approached
devī smara-śarārditā
devī
Urvaśī
smara-śara
by the arrows of Cupid
arditā
being stricken.
Thereafter, from Budha, through the womb of Ilā, a son was born named Purūravā, who was described in the beginning of the Ninth Canto. When his beauty, personal qualities, magnanimity, behavior, wealth and power were described by Nārada in the court of Lord Indra, the celestial woman Urvaśī was attracted to him. Pierced by the arrow of Cupid, she thus approached him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thereafter, from Budha, through the womb of Ilā (Sudyumna), a son was born named Purūravā, who was mentioned previously. [Note: Sudyumna was the son of Śraddhadeva, Vaivasvata Manu. SB 9.1.22] When his beauty, personal qualities, magnanimity, behavior, wealth and power were described by Nārada in the court of Indra, the celestial woman Urvaśī became attracted to him. Pierced by the arrow of Cupid, she thus approached him.
From Budha and Ilā comes Purūravā, so attractive that even celestial Urvaśī comes pierced by Cupid's arrow. The compound effects of good lineage and bhakti can produce souls whose magnetism reaches beyond their own world.
Reflection Questions
  • What positive 'magnetism' am I noticing in those raised with genuine devotional culture?
  • How could my own choices today increase the spiritual magnetism of my descendants?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.17-18

↗
मित्रावरुणयो: शापादापन्ना नरलोकताम् । निशम्य पुरुषश्रेष्ठं कन्दर्पमिव रूपिणम् । धृतिं विष्टभ्य ललना उपतस्थे तदन्तिके ॥ १७ ॥ स तां विलोक्य नृपतिर्हर्षेणोत्फुल्ललोचन: । उवाच श्लक्ष्णया वाचा देवीं हृष्टतनूरुह: ॥ १८ ॥
mitrā-varuṇayoḥ śāpād
[mitraa-varunayoh shaapaad]
āpannā nara-lokatām
[aapannaa nara-lokataam]
niśamya puruṣa-śreṣṭhaṁ
[nishamya purusha-shreshtham]
kandarpam iva rūpiṇam
[kandarpam iva roopinam]
dhṛtiṁ viṣṭabhya lalanā
[dhritim vishtabhya lalanaa]
upatasthe tad-antike
[upatasthe tad-antike]
sa tāṁ vilokya nṛpatir
[sa taam vilokya nripatir]
harṣeṇotphulla-locanaḥ
[harshenotphulla-lochanah]
uvāca ślakṣṇayā vācā
[uvaacha shlakshnayaa vaachaa]
devīṁ hṛṣṭa-tanūruhaḥ
[deveem hrishta-tanooruhah]
mitrā-varuṇayoḥ — of Mitra and Varuṇa śāpāt — by the curse āpannā — having obtained nara-lokatām — the habits of a human being niśamya — thus seeing puruṣa-śreṣṭham — the best of males kandarpam iva — like Cupid rūpiṇam — having beauty dhṛtim — patience, forbearance viṣṭabhya — accepting lalanā — that woman upatasthe — approached tat-antike — near to him saḥ — he, Purūravā tām — her vilokya — by seeing nṛpatiḥ — the King harṣeṇa — with great jubilation utphulla-locanaḥ — whose eyes became very bright uvāca — said ślakṣṇayā — very mild vācā — by words devīm — unto the demigoddess hṛṣṭa-tanūruhaḥ — the hairs on whose body were standing in jubilation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mitrā-varuṇayoḥ śāpād
mitrā-varuṇayoḥ
of Mitra and Varuṇa
śāpāt
by the curse
āpannā nara-lokatām
āpannā
having obtained
nara-lokatām
the habits of a human being
niśamya puruṣa-śreṣṭhaṁ
niśamya
thus seeing
puruṣa-śreṣṭham
the best of males
kandarpam iva rūpiṇam
kandarpam iva
like Cupid
rūpiṇam
having beauty
dhṛtiṁ viṣṭabhya lalanā
dhṛtim
patience, forbearance
viṣṭabhya
accepting
lalanā
that woman
upatasthe tad-antike
upatasthe
approached
tat-antike
near to him
sa tāṁ vilokya nṛpatir
saḥ
he, Purūravā
tām
her
vilokya
by seeing
nṛpatiḥ
the King
harṣeṇotphulla-locanaḥ
harṣeṇa
with great jubilation
utphulla-locanaḥ
whose eyes became very bright
uvāca ślakṣṇayā vācā
uvāca
said
ślakṣṇayā
very mild
vācā
by words
devīṁ hṛṣṭa-tanūruhaḥ
devīm
unto the demigoddess
hṛṣṭa-tanūruhaḥ
the hairs on whose body were standing in jubilation.
Having been cursed by Mitra and Varuṇa, the celestial woman Urvaśī had acquired the habits of a human being. Therefore, upon seeing Purūravā, the best of males, whose beauty resembled that of Cupid, she controlled herself and then approached him. When King Purūravā saw Urvaśī, his eyes became jubilant in the ecstasy of joy, and the hairs on his body stood on end. With mild, pleasing words, he spoke to her as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because of being cursed by Mitra and Varuṇa, Urvaśī came to earth. Upon seeing Purūravā, the best of males, whose beauty resembled that of Cupid, she controlled herself and approached him. When King Purūravā saw Urvaśī, his eyes became jubilant in the ecstasy of joy and the hairs on his body stood on end. With mild, pleasing words, he spoke to her as follows. Because Mitra and Varuṇa had become lusty on seeing her, they cursed her to enjoy like a human. Nara-lokatām means “she came to earth.”
Urvaśī, cursed to have human habits, approaches Purūravā with passion. Even celestial beings, under the right curse, develop the same vulnerabilities we have — and the meeting of two cursed beauties is rarely a happy long story.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I treating a strong attraction as cosmic destiny rather than as a possibly cursed encounter?
  • What does the body's reaction — hair standing on end — actually signal that I should pause to interpret?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.19

↗
श्रीराजोवाच स्वागतं ते वरारोहे आस्यतां करवाम किम् । संरमस्व मया साकं रतिर्नौ शाश्वती: समा: ॥ १९ ॥
śrī-rājovāca
[shree-raajovaacha]
svāgataṁ te varārohe
[svaagatam te varaarohe]
āsyatāṁ karavāma kim
[aasyataam karavaama kim]
saṁramasva mayā sākaṁ
[samramasva mayaa saakam]
ratir nau śāśvatīḥ samāḥ
[ratir nau shaashvateeh samaah]
śrī-rājā uvāca — the King (Purūravā) said svāgatam — welcome te — unto you varārohe — O best of beautiful women āsyatām — kindly take your seat karavāma kim — what can I do for you saṁramasva — just become my companion mayā sākam — with me ratiḥ — a sexual relationship nau — between us śāśvatīḥ samāḥ — for many years.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rājovāca
śrī-rājā uvāca
the King (Purūravā) said
svāgataṁ te varārohe
svāgatam
welcome
te
unto you
varārohe
O best of beautiful women
āsyatāṁ karavāma kim
āsyatām
kindly take your seat
karavāma kim
what can I do for you
saṁramasva mayā sākaṁ
saṁramasva
just become my companion
mayā sākam
with me
ratir nau śāśvatīḥ samāḥ
ratiḥ
a sexual relationship
nau
between us
śāśvatīḥ samāḥ
for many years.
King Purūravā said: O most beautiful woman, you are welcome. Please sit here and tell me what I can do for you. You may enjoy with me as long as you desire. Let us pass our life happily in a sexual relationship.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Purūravā said: O most beautiful woman! You are welcome. Please sit here and tell me what I can do for you. Enjoy with me. We can enjoy sex life for many years. May we have sex life (verb should be supplied).
Purūravā instantly invites the unknown woman to enjoy life with him 'as long as you desire.' Speed of commitment, made under attraction, leaves no time for the discernment that any union actually requires.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I currently making commitments at the speed of attraction rather than the pace of discernment?
  • What would slowing down by even a week have saved me from in the past?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.20

↗
उर्वश्युवाच कस्यास्त्वयि न सज्जेत मनो द‍ृष्टिश्च सुन्दर । यदङ्गान्तरमासाद्य च्यवते ह रिरंसया ॥ २० ॥
urvaśy uvāca
[urvashy uvaacha]
kasyās tvayi na sajjeta
[kasyaas tvayi na sajjeta]
mano dṛṣṭiś ca sundara
[mano drishtish cha sundara]
yad-aṅgāntaram āsādya
[yad-angaantaram aasaadya]
cyavate ha riraṁsayā
[chyavate ha riramsayaa]
urvaśī uvāca — Urvaśī replied kasyāḥ — of which woman tvayi — unto you na — not sajjeta — would become attracted manaḥ — the mind dṛṣṭiḥ ca — and sight sundara — O most beautiful man yat-aṅgāntaram — whose chest āsādya — enjoying cyavate — gives up ha — indeed riraṁsayā — for sexual enjoyment.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
urvaśy uvāca
urvaśī uvāca
Urvaśī replied
kasyās tvayi na sajjeta
kasyāḥ
of which woman
tvayi
unto you
na
not
sajjeta
would become attracted
mano dṛṣṭiś ca sundara
manaḥ
the mind
dṛṣṭiḥ ca
and sight
sundara
O most beautiful man
yad-aṅgāntaram āsādya
yat-aṅgāntaram
whose chest
āsādya
enjoying
cyavate ha riraṁsayā
cyavate
gives up
ha
indeed
riraṁsayā
for sexual enjoyment.
Urvaśī replied: O most handsome man, who is the woman whose mind and sight would not be attracted by you? If a woman takes shelter of your chest, she cannot refuse to enjoy with you in a sexual relationship.

When a beautiful man and a beautiful woman unite together and embrace one another, how within these three worlds can they check their sexual relationship? Therefore Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (7.9.45) says, yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Urvaśī replied: O most handsome man! Who is the woman whose mind and sight would not be attracted by you? Getting an opportunity in a solitary place, the mind becomes transformed by a desire for enjoyment. O King (aṅga)! This is because, getting an opportunity in a solitary place, the mind becomes transformed by desire for enjoyment.
Urvaśī admits no woman could refuse him. Mutual physical attraction, once engaged, becomes nearly impossible to dis-engage by willpower alone — the time to manage it is before the engagement.
Reflection Questions
  • What early-stage situation am I planning to 'manage with willpower' that I should be avoiding altogether?
  • Where have I underestimated the brakes I will not actually have?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.21

↗
एतावुरणकौ राजन् न्यासौ रक्षस्व मानद । संरंस्ये भवता साकं श्लाघ्य: स्त्रीणां वर: स्मृत: ॥ २१ ॥
etāv uraṇakau rājan
[etaav uranakau raajan]
nyāsau rakṣasva mānada
[nyaasau rakshasva maanada]
saṁraṁsye bhavatā sākaṁ
[samramsye bhavataa saakam]
ślāghyaḥ strīṇāṁ varaḥ smṛtaḥ
[shlaaghyah streenaam varah smritah]
etau — to these two uraṇakau — lambs rājan — O King Purūravā nyāsau — who have fallen down rakṣasva — please give protection māna-da — O one who gives all honor to a guest or visitor saṁraṁsye — I shall enjoy sexual union bhavatā sākam — in your company ślāghyaḥ — superior strīṇām — of a woman varaḥ — husband smṛtaḥ — it is said.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etāv uraṇakau rājan
etau
to these two
uraṇakau
lambs
rājan
O King Purūravā
nyāsau rakṣasva mānada
nyāsau
who have fallen down
rakṣasva
please give protection
māna-da
O one who gives all honor to a guest or visitor
saṁraṁsye bhavatā sākaṁ
saṁraṁsye
I shall enjoy sexual union
bhavatā sākam
in your company
ślāghyaḥ strīṇāṁ varaḥ smṛtaḥ
ślāghyaḥ
superior
strīṇām
of a woman
varaḥ
husband
smṛtaḥ
it is said.
My dear King Purūravā, please give protection to these two lambs, who have fallen down with me. Although I belong to the heavenly planets and you belong to earth, I shall certainly enjoy sexual union with you. I have no objection to accepting you as my husband, for you are superior in every respect.

As stated in the Brahma-saṁhitā (5.40) , yasya prabhā prabhavato jagad-aṇḍa-koṭi-koṭiṣv aśeṣa-vasudhādi-vibhūti-bhinnam. There are various planets and various atmospheres within this universe. The atmosphere of the heavenly planet from which Urvaśī descended after being cursed by Mitra and Varuṇa was different from the atmosphere of this earth. Indeed, the inhabitants of the heavenly planets are certainly far superior to the inhabitants of earth. Nonetheless, Urvaśī agreed to remain the consort of Purūravā, although she belonged to a superior community. A woman who finds a man with superior qualities may accept such a man as her husband. Similarly, if a man finds a woman who is from an inferior family but who has good qualities, he can accept such a brilliant wife, as advised by Śrī Cāṇakya Paṇḍita ( strī-ratnaṁ duṣkulād api ). The combination of male and female is worthwhile if the qualities of both are on an equal level.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear King Purūravā, who honors others! Please give protection to these two lambs, which I entrust to you. I shall certainly enjoy union with you. You are superior in every respect. She makes him promise in two verses since she desires to return to Svarga by expending the curse. Please protect the two sheep which I entrust to you. He who is praiseworthy is known as best for all women. There is no fault if I, a heavenly women, unite with you from earth.
Urvaśī asks Purūravā to protect two lambs that fell down with her — and proposes marriage on those terms. Every union comes with conditions and dependents we must accept; we rarely get the partner without the lambs.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'lambs' come with the relationships I have entered or am considering?
  • Am I prepared to protect them as part of loving the person?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.22

↗
घृतं मे वीर भक्ष्यं स्यान्नेक्षे त्वान्यत्र मैथुनात् । विवाससं तत् तथेति प्रतिपेदे महामना: ॥ २२ ॥
ghṛtaṁ me vīra bhakṣyaṁ syān
[ghritam me veera bhakshyam syaan]
nekṣe tvānyatra maithunāt
[nekshe tvaanyatra maithunaat]
vivāsasaṁ tat tatheti
[vivaasasam tat tatheti]
pratipede mahāmanāḥ
[pratipede mahaamanaah]
ghṛtam — clarified butter or nectar me — my vīra — O hero bhakṣyam — eatable syāt — shall be na — not īkṣe — I shall see tvā — you anyatra — any other time maithunāt — except at the time of sexual intercourse vivāsasam — without any dress (naked) tat — that tathā iti — shall be like that pratipede — promised mahāmanāḥ — King Purūravā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ghṛtaṁ me vīra bhakṣyaṁ syān
ghṛtam
clarified butter or nectar
me
my
vīra
O hero
bhakṣyam
eatable
syāt
shall be
nekṣe tvānyatra maithunāt
na
not
īkṣe
I shall see
tvā
you
vivāsasaṁ tat tatheti
pratipede mahāmanāḥ
anyatra
any other time
maithunāt
except at the time of sexual intercourse
vivāsasam
without any dress (naked)
tat
that
tathā iti
shall be like that
pratipede
promised
mahāmanāḥ
King Purūravā.
Urvaśī said: “My dear hero, only preparations made in ghee [clarified butter] will be my eatables, and I shall not want to see you naked at any time, except at the time of sexual intercourse.” The great-minded King Purūravā accepted these proposals.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O hero! Only preparations made in ghee will be my eatables, and I shall not see you naked at any time, except at the time of sexual intercourse. The great-minded King Purūravā accepted these proposals. I will only eat ghee, or nectar (amṛtam). The śruti says that the devatās live on nectar. Tvā means you. He accepted her words (tat).
Urvaśī sets two conditions — only ghee preparations, never see her husband naked except during intimacy. Specific, even unusual, commitments may be the very glue that keeps a fragile bond intact.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'small' agreements in my relationships am I treating as negotiable that may actually be load-bearing?
  • Where could naming one clear shared rule restabilize a wobbling bond?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.23

↗
अहो रूपमहो भावो नरलोकविमोहनम् । को न सेवेत मनुजो देवीं त्वां स्वयमागताम् ॥ २३ ॥
aho rūpam aho bhāvo
[aho roopam aho bhaavo]
nara-loka-vimohanam
[nara-loka-vimohanam]
ko na seveta manujo
[ko na seveta manujo]
devīṁ tvāṁ svayam āgatām
[deveem tvaam svayam aagataam]
aho — wonderful rūpam — beauty aho — wonderful bhāvaḥ — postures nara-loka — in human society or on the planet earth vimohanam — so attractive kaḥ — who na — not seveta — can accept manujaḥ — among human beings devīm — a demigoddess tvām — like you svayam āgatām — who has personally arrived.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho rūpam aho bhāvo
aho
wonderful
rūpam
beauty
aho
wonderful
bhāvaḥ
postures
nara-loka-vimohanam
nara-loka
in human society or on the planet earth
vimohanam
so attractive
kaḥ
who
ko na seveta manujo
na
not
seveta
can accept
manujaḥ
among human beings
devīṁ tvāṁ svayam āgatām
devīm
a demigoddess
tvām
like you
svayam āgatām
who has personally arrived.
Purūravā replied: O beautiful one, your beauty is wonderful and your gestures are also wonderful. Indeed, you are attractive to all human society. Therefore, since you have come of your own accord from the heavenly planets, who on earth would not agree to serve a demigoddess such as you.

It appears from the words of Urvaśī that the standard of living, eating, behavior and speech are all different on the heavenly planets from the standards on this planet earth. The inhabitants of the heavenly planets do not eat such abominable things as meat and eggs; everything they eat is prepared in clarified butter. Nor do they like to see either men or women naked, except at the time of sexual intercourse. To live naked or almost naked is uncivilized, but on this planet earth it has now become fashionable to dress half naked, and sometimes those like hippies live completely naked. Indeed, there are many clubs and societies for this purpose. Such conduct is not allowed, however, on the heavenly planets. The inhabitants of the heavenly planets, aside from being very beautiful, both in complexion and bodily features, are well-behaved and long-living, and they eat first-class food in goodness. These are some of the distinctions between the inhabitants of the heavenly planets and the inhabitants of earth.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Purūravā replied: O! What mortal would not serve you? You have come of your own according, attracting all men with your beauty and alluring posture. Bhāvaḥ means allurements.
Purūravā agrees, marveling at her beauty and divine origin. A man dazzled by his partner's apparent superiority often agrees to terms whose weight he has not understood.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I agreed to terms whose seriousness I only later understood?
  • What current agreement deserves a sober second reading?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.24

↗
तया स पुरुषश्रेष्ठो रमयन्त्या यथार्हत: । रेमे सुरविहारेषु कामं चैत्ररथादिषु ॥ २४ ॥
tayā sa puruṣa-śreṣṭho
[tayaa sa purusha-shreshtho]
ramayantyā yathārhataḥ
[ramayantyaa yathaarhatah]
reme sura-vihāreṣu
[reme sura-vihaareshu]
kāmaṁ caitrarathādiṣu
[kaamam chaitrarathaadishu]
tayā — with her saḥ — he puruṣa-śreṣṭhaḥ — the best of human beings (Purūravā) ramayantyā — enjoying yathā-arhataḥ — as far as possible reme — enjoyed sura-vihāreṣu — in places resembling the heavenly parks kāmam — according to his desire caitraratha-ādiṣu — in the best gardens, like Caitraratha.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tayā sa puruṣa-śreṣṭho
tayā
with her
saḥ
he
puruṣa-śreṣṭhaḥ
the best of human beings (Purūravā)
ramayantyā yathārhataḥ
ramayantyā
enjoying
yathā-arhataḥ
as far as possible
reme sura-vihāreṣu
reme
enjoyed
sura-vihāreṣu
in places resembling the heavenly parks
kāmaṁ caitrarathādiṣu
kāmam
according to his desire
caitraratha-ādiṣu
in the best gardens, like Caitraratha.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: The best of human beings, Purūravā, began freely enjoying the company of Urvaśī, who engaged in sexual activities with him in many celestial places, such as Caitraratha and Nandana-kānana, where the demigods enjoy.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The best of human beings, Purūravā, began freely enjoying the company of Urvaśī, who enjoyed as well in many celestial places, such as Caitraratha, where the devatās enjoy.
The pair travel from one celestial garden to another, enjoying themselves freely. The honeymoon phase is real and beautiful — but its very ease can disguise what conditions actually sustain the union.
Reflection Questions
  • How aware am I of the conditions that quietly sustain my current happiness?
  • Where might I be enjoying without noticing the supports that may not last?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.25

↗
रममाणस्तया देव्या पद्मकिञ्जल्कगन्धया । तन्मुखामोदमुषितो मुमुदेऽहर्गणान् बहून् ॥ २५ ॥
ramamāṇas tayā devyā
[ramamaanas tayaa devyaa]
padma-kiñjalka-gandhayā
[padma-kinjalka-gandhayaa]
tan-mukhāmoda-muṣito
[tan-mukhaamoda-mushito]
mumude ’har-gaṇān bahūn
[mumude ’har-ganaan bahoon]
ramamāṇaḥ — enjoying sex tayā — with her devyā — the heavenly goddess padma — of a lotus kiñjalka — like the saffron gandhayā — the fragrance of whom tat-mukha — her beautiful face āmoda — by the fragrance muṣitaḥ — being enlivened more and more mumude — enjoyed life ahaḥ-gaṇān — days after days bahūn — many.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ramamāṇas tayā devyā
ramamāṇaḥ
enjoying sex
tayā
with her
devyā
the heavenly goddess
padma-kiñjalka-gandhayā
padma
of a lotus
kiñjalka
like the saffron
gandhayā
the fragrance of whom
tan-mukhāmoda-muṣito
tat-mukha
her beautiful face
āmoda
by the fragrance
muṣitaḥ
being enlivened more and more
mumude ’har-gaṇān bahūn
mumude
enjoyed life
ahaḥ-gaṇān
days after days
bahūn
many.
Urvaśī’s body was as fragrant as the saffron of a lotus. Being enlivened by the fragrance of her face and body, Purūravā enjoyed her company for many days with great jubilation.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Enraptured by the fragrance of her face, Purūravā enjoyed with Urvaśī, who had the fragrance of lotus pollen, for many days.
Urvaśī's body is fragrant as lotus saffron — Purūravā is enlivened for many days. Beauty alone can sustain a relationship for a long time, but never indefinitely — the body's freshness is not the foundation.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my relationship would still be there if the body's freshness faded tomorrow?
  • Where am I confusing sensual delight with genuine union?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.26

↗
अपश्यन्नुर्वशीमिन्द्रो गन्धर्वान् समचोदयत् । उर्वशीरहितं मह्यमास्थानं नातिशोभते ॥ २६ ॥
apaśyann urvaśīm indro
[apashyann urvasheem indro]
gandharvān samacodayat
[gandharvaan samachodayat]
urvaśī-rahitaṁ mahyam
[urvashee-rahitam mahyam]
āsthānaṁ nātiśobhate
[aasthaanam naatishobhate]
apaśyan — without seeing urvaśīm — Urvaśī indraḥ — the King of the heavenly planet gandharvān — unto the Gandharvas samacodayat — instructed urvaśī-rahitam — without Urvaśī mahyam — my āsthānam — place na — not atiśobhate — appears beautiful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apaśyann urvaśīm indro
apaśyan
without seeing
urvaśīm
Urvaśī
indraḥ
the King of the heavenly planet
gandharvān samacodayat
gandharvān
unto the Gandharvas
samacodayat
instructed
urvaśī-rahitaṁ mahyam
urvaśī-rahitam
without Urvaśī
mahyam
my
āsthānaṁ nātiśobhate
āsthānam
place
na
not
atiśobhate
appears beautiful.
Not seeing Urvaśī in his assembly, the King of heaven, Lord Indra, said, “Without Urvaśī my assembly is no longer beautiful.” Considering this, he requested the Gandharvas to bring her back to his heavenly planet.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Not seeing Urvaśī in his assembly, Indra said to the Gandharvas, “Without Urvaśī my assembly is no longer beautiful.” My assembly (mahyam āsthānam) is not beautiful.
Indra, missing Urvaśī, says his court is 'no longer beautiful' and arranges for her recovery. Beautiful people are claimed by multiple kingdoms — and the one currently holding them is rarely the only suitor.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose other claimants in my partner's life am I underestimating?
  • Where am I assuming exclusive access I have not actually secured?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.27

↗
ते उपेत्य महारात्रे तमसि प्रत्युपस्थिते । उर्वश्या उरणौ जह्रुर्न्यस्तौ राजनि जायया ॥ २७ ॥
te upetya mahā-rātre
[te upetya mahaa-raatre]
tamasi pratyupasthite
[tamasi pratyupasthite]
urvaśyā uraṇau jahrur
[urvashyaa uranau jahrur]
nyastau rājani jāyayā
[nyastau raajani jaayayaa]
te — they, the Gandharvas upetya — coming there mahā-rātre — in the dead of night tamasi — when the darkness pratyupasthite — appeared urvaśyā — by Urvaśī uraṇau — two lambs jahruḥ — stole nyastau — given in charge rājani — unto the King jāyayā — by his wife, Urvaśī.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te upetya mahā-rātre
te
they, the Gandharvas
upetya
coming there
mahā-rātre
in the dead of night
tamasi pratyupasthite
tamasi
when the darkness
pratyupasthite
appeared
urvaśyā uraṇau jahrur
urvaśyā
by Urvaśī
uraṇau
two lambs
jahruḥ
stole
nyastau rājani jāyayā
nyastau
given in charge
rājani
unto the King
jāyayā
by his wife, Urvaśī.
Thus the Gandharvas came to earth, and at midnight, when everything was dark, they appeared in the house of Purūravā and stole the two lambs entrusted to the King by his wife, Urvaśī.

“The dead of night” refers to midnight. The mahā-niśā is described in this smṛti-mantra: mahā-niśā dve ghaṭike rātrer madhyama-yāmayoḥ, “Twelve o’clock midnight is called the dead of night.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus the Gandharvas came to earth, and in the darkness of midnight they appeared in the house of Purūravā and stole the two lambs entrusted to the King by his wife, Urvaśī. Mahāṛātre means “at midnight.” According smṛti, midnight means the ghaṭikas in the middle of the two yāmas of the night.
At midnight, in deep darkness, the Gandharvas steal the lambs. The very condition that secured the marriage is removed by an external party at the moment of least vigilance.
Reflection Questions
  • What hidden condition of my relationship is currently most exposed?
  • Where am I asleep when I should be watchful at the gate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.28

↗
निशम्याक्रन्दितं देवी पुत्रयोर्नीयमानयो: । हतास्म्यहं कुनाथेन नपुंसा वीरमानिना ॥ २८ ॥
niśamyākranditaṁ devī
[nishamyaakranditam devee]
putrayor nīyamānayoḥ
[putrayor neeyamaanayoh]
hatāsmy ahaṁ kunāthena
[hataasmy aham kunaathena]
napuṁsā vīra-māninā
[napumsaa veera-maaninaa]
niśamya — by hearing ākranditam — crying (because of being stolen) devī — Urvaśī putrayoḥ — of those two lambs, which she treated as sons nīyamānayoḥ — as they were being taken away hatā — killed asmi — am aham — I ku-nāthena — under the protection of a bad husband na-puṁsā — by the eunuch vīra-māninā — although considering himself a hero.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
niśamyākranditaṁ devī
niśamya
by hearing
ākranditam
crying (because of being stolen)
devī
Urvaśī
putrayor nīyamānayoḥ
putrayoḥ
of those two lambs, which she treated as sons
nīyamānayoḥ
as they were being taken away
hatāsmy ahaṁ kunāthena
hatā
killed
asmi
am
aham
I
ku-nāthena
under the protection of a bad husband
na-puṁsā
by the eunuch
napuṁsā vīra-māninā
vīra-māninā
although considering himself a hero.
Urvaśī treated the two lambs like her own sons. Therefore, when they were being taken by the Gandharvas and began crying, Urvaśī heard them and rebuked her husband. “Now I am being killed,” she said, “under the protection of an unworthy husband, who is a coward and a eunuch although he thinks himself a great hero.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Therefore, hearing the crying the lambs, which were like her sons, as they were being taken by the Gandharvas, Urvaśī rebuked her husband. “I have been killed by an unworthy protector, a eunuch who thinks himself a hero.”
Urvaśī erupts: under an unworthy husband she is being 'killed,' a coward who only seems brave by day. Crisis exposes whether our partner believes us to be the protector we have claimed to be.
Reflection Questions
  • How will my closest people describe me the next time something goes wrong on my watch?
  • Where am I performing strength in public while shrinking in private?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.29

↗
यद्विश्रम्भादहं नष्टा हृतापत्या च दस्युभि: । य: शेते निशि सन्त्रस्तो यथा नारी दिवा पुमान् ॥ २९ ॥
yad-viśrambhād ahaṁ naṣṭā
[yad-vishrambhaad aham nashtaa]
hṛtāpatyā ca dasyubhiḥ
[hritaapatyaa cha dasyubhih]
yaḥ śete niśi santrasto
[yah shete nishi santrasto]
yathā nārī divā pumān
[yathaa naaree divaa pumaan]
yat-viśrambhāt — because of depending upon whom aham — I (am) naṣṭā — lost hṛta-apatyā — bereft of my two sons, the lambs ca — also dasyubhiḥ — by the plunderers yaḥ — he who (my so-called husband) śete — lies down niśi — at night santrastaḥ — being afraid yathā — as nārī — a woman divā — during the daytime pumān — male.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yad-viśrambhād ahaṁ naṣṭā
yat-viśrambhāt
because of depending upon whom
aham
I (am)
naṣṭā
lost
hṛtāpatyā ca dasyubhiḥ
hṛta-apatyā
bereft of my two sons, the lambs
ca
also
dasyubhiḥ
by the plunderers
yaḥ śete niśi santrasto
yaḥ
he who (my so-called husband)
śete
lies down
niśi
at night
santrastaḥ
being afraid
yathā nārī divā pumān
yathā
as
nārī
a woman
divā
during the daytime
pumān
male.
“Because I depended on him, the plunderers have deprived me of my two sons the lambs, and therefore I am now lost. My husband lies down at night in fear, exactly like a woman, although he appears to be a man during the day.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because I depended on him, the plunderers have deprived me of my two sons the lambs, and therefore I am now lost. My husband lies down at night in fear, exactly like a woman, although he appears to be a man during the day. As night he is afraid like a woman. He cannot get the sheep back from the thieves. By day only, he is a man.
She accuses him of cowering at night like a woman though appearing manly by day. The Bhāgavatam plainly preserves the harshest words; we should not be shocked when relationships under stress turn brutal.
Reflection Questions
  • What harsh truth has been said about me that I have refused to receive?
  • Where do I owe a less brutal but equally honest hearing to a partner's frustration?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.30

↗
इति वाक्सायकैर्बिद्ध: प्रतोत्त्रैरिव कुञ्जर: । निशि निस्त्रिंशमादाय विवस्त्रोऽभ्यद्रवद् रुषा ॥ ३० ॥
iti vāk-sāyakair biddhaḥ
[iti vaak-saayakair biddhah]
pratottrair iva kuñjaraḥ
[pratottrair iva kunjarah]
niśi nistriṁśam ādāya
[nishi nistrimsham aadaaya]
vivastro ’bhyadravad ruṣā
[vivastro ’bhyadravad rushaa]
iti — thus vāk-sāyakaiḥ — by the arrows of strong words biddhaḥ — being pierced pratottraiḥ — by the goads iva — like kuñjaraḥ — an elephant niśi — in the night nistriṁśam — a sword ādāya — taking in hand vivastraḥ — naked abhyadravat — went out ruṣā — in anger.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti vāk-sāyakair biddhaḥ
iti
thus
vāk-sāyakaiḥ
by the arrows of strong words
biddhaḥ
being pierced
pratottrair iva kuñjaraḥ
pratottraiḥ
by the goads
iva
like
kuñjaraḥ
an elephant
niśi nistriṁśam ādāya
niśi
in the night
nistriṁśam
a sword
ādāya
taking in hand
vivastro ’bhyadravad ruṣā
vivastraḥ
naked
abhyadravat
went out
ruṣā
in anger.
Purūravā, stricken by the sharp words of Urvaśī like an elephant struck by its driver’s pointed rod, became very angry. Not even dressing himself properly, he took a sword in hand and went out naked into the night to follow the Gandharvas who had stolen the lambs.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Purūravā, stricken by the sharp words of Urvaśī like an elephant struck by its driver’s pointed rod, became very angry. He took a sword in hand and without clothing, began pursuing the Gandharvas. Nistriṁśam is a sword.
Stung by her words, Purūravā goes out naked into the night with a sword. Embarrassed manhood often acts impulsively without proper preparation — the dignity dropped is rarely recoverable.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I about to react impulsively to a verbal sting in a way I will later regret?
  • What would five minutes of getting properly dressed — physically or mentally — save me from?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.31

↗
ते विसृज्योरणौ तत्र व्यद्योतन्त स्म विद्युत: । आदाय मेषावायान्तं नग्नमैक्षत सा पतिम् ॥ ३१ ॥
te visṛjyoraṇau tatra
[te visrijyoranau tatra]
vyadyotanta sma vidyutaḥ
[vyadyotanta sma vidyutah]
ādāya meṣāv āyāntaṁ
[aadaaya meshaav aayaantam]
nagnam aikṣata sā patim
[nagnam aikshata saa patim]
te — they, the Gandharvas visṛjya — after giving up uraṇau — the two lambs tatra — on the spot vyadyotanta sma — illuminated vidyutaḥ — shining like lightning ādāya — taking in hand meṣau — the two lambs āyāntam — returning nagnam — naked aikṣata — saw sā — Urvaśī patim — her husband.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te visṛjyoraṇau tatra
te
they, the Gandharvas
visṛjya
after giving up
uraṇau
the two lambs
tatra
on the spot
vyadyotanta sma vidyutaḥ
vyadyotanta sma
illuminated
vidyutaḥ
shining like lightning
ādāya meṣāv āyāntaṁ
ādāya
taking in hand
meṣau
the two lambs
āyāntam
returning
nagnam aikṣata sā patim
nagnam
naked
aikṣata
saw
sā
Urvaśī
patim
her husband.
After giving up the two lambs, the Gandharvas shone brightly like lightning, thus illuminating the house of Purūravā. Urvaśī then saw her husband returning with the lambs in hand, but he was naked, and therefore she left.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Dropping the two lambs, the Gandharvas shone brightly like lightning, thus illuminating the house of Purūravā. Urvaśī then saw her naked husband returning with the lambs. Being especially effulgent the Gandharvas lit up the place. Then Urvaśī saw her husband naked. Because he broke the promise, she disappeared.
He recovers the lambs but his nakedness illuminates the house — and Urvaśī, seeing the broken condition, leaves. A condition broken even for one valid reason still counts as broken; love does not always survive technical violations.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'small' agreement am I about to break for a 'good reason' that may still cost me the relationship?
  • Where have I underestimated the rigidity of certain conditions in my closest bonds?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.32

↗
ऐलोऽपि शयने जायामपश्यन् विमना इव । तच्चित्तो विह्वल: शोचन् बभ्रामोन्मत्तवन्महीम् ॥ ३२ ॥
ailo ’pi śayane jāyām
[ailo ’pi shayane jaayaam]
apaśyan vimanā iva
[apashyan vimanaa iva]
tac-citto vihvalaḥ śocan
[tach-chitto vihvalah shochan]
babhrāmonmattavan mahīm
[babhraamonmattavan maheem]
ailaḥ — Purūravā api — also śayane — on the bedstead jāyām — his wife apaśyan — not seeing vimanāḥ — morose iva — like that tat-cittaḥ — being too much attached to her vihvalaḥ — disturbed in mind śocan — lamenting babhrāma — traveled unmatta-vat — like a madman mahīm — on the earth.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ailo ’pi śayane jāyām
ailaḥ
Purūravā
apaśyan vimanā iva
api
also
śayane
on the bedstead
jāyām
his wife
apaśyan
not seeing
vimanāḥ
morose
iva
like that
tac-citto vihvalaḥ śocan
tat-cittaḥ
being too much attached to her
vihvalaḥ
disturbed in mind
śocan
lamenting
babhrāmonmattavan mahīm
babhrāma
traveled
unmatta-vat
like a madman
mahīm
on the earth.
No longer seeing Urvaśī on his bed, Purūravā was most aggrieved. Because of his great attraction for her, he was very much disturbed. Thus, lamenting, he began traveling about the earth like a madman.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
No longer seeing Urvaśī on his bed, Purūravā was most aggrieved. Because of his great attraction for her, he was disturbed. Lamenting, he began traveling about the earth like a madman.
Bereft of Urvaśī, Purūravā wanders the earth like a madman. Loss of a beloved can derange even a king — material love, by its nature, equips us for this madness.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'madman wandering' have I done after a loss, and what did it accomplish?
  • Where could I redirect future grief into devotional energy instead of derangement?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.33

↗
स तां वीक्ष्य कुरुक्षेत्रे सरस्वत्यां च तत्सखी: । पञ्च प्रहृष्टवदन: प्राह सूक्तं पुरूरवा: ॥ ३३ ॥
sa tāṁ vīkṣya kurukṣetre
[sa taam veekshya kurukshetre]
sarasvatyāṁ ca tat-sakhīḥ
[sarasvatyaam cha tat-sakheeh]
pañca prahṛṣṭa-vadanaḥ
[pancha prahrishta-vadanah]
prāha sūktaṁ purūravāḥ
[praaha sooktam purooravaah]
saḥ — he, Purūravā tām — Urvaśī vīkṣya — observing kurukṣetre — at the place known as Kurukṣetra sarasvatyām — on the bank of the Sarasvatī ca — also tat-sakhīḥ — her companions pañca — five prahṛṣṭa-vadanaḥ — being very happy and smiling prāha — said sūktam — sweet words purūravāḥ — King Purūravā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa tāṁ vīkṣya kurukṣetre
saḥ
he, Purūravā
tām
Urvaśī
vīkṣya
observing
kurukṣetre
at the place known as Kurukṣetra
sarasvatyāṁ ca tat-sakhīḥ
sarasvatyām
on the bank of the Sarasvatī
ca
also
tat-sakhīḥ
her companions
pañca prahṛṣṭa-vadanaḥ
pañca
five
prahṛṣṭa-vadanaḥ
being very happy and smiling
prāha sūktaṁ purūravāḥ
prāha
said
sūktam
sweet words
purūravāḥ
King Purūravā.
Once during his travels all over the world, Purūravā saw Urvaśī, accompanied by five companions, on the bank of the Sarasvatī at Kurukṣetra. With jubilation in his face, he then spoke to her in sweet words as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Purūravā later saw Urvaśī, accompanied by five companions, on the bank of the Sarasvatī at Kurukṣetra. With jubilation in his face, he then spoke to her in sweet words as follows.
Eventually he finds her at Kurukṣetra on the Sarasvatī, accompanied by five companions. Sacred places have a way of arranging encounters that random wandering will not — there is a reason to go to tīrthas.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom have I encountered through pilgrimage that random life would never have produced?
  • What pilgrimage have I been postponing that might arrange the meeting I need?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.34

↗
अहो जाये तिष्ठ तिष्ठ घोरे न त्यक्तुमर्हसि । मां त्वमद्याप्यनिर्वृत्य वचांसि कृणवावहै ॥ ३४ ॥
aho jāye tiṣṭha tiṣṭha
[aho jaaye tishtha tishtha]
ghore na tyaktum arhasi
[ghore na tyaktum arhasi]
māṁ tvam adyāpy anirvṛtya
[maam tvam adyaapy anirvritya]
vacāṁsi kṛṇavāvahai
[vachaamsi krinavaavahai]
aho — hello jāye — O my dear wife tiṣṭha tiṣṭha — kindly stay, stay ghore — O most cruel one na — not tyaktum — to give up arhasi — you ought mām — me tvam — you adya api — until now anirvṛtya — having not gotten any happiness from me vacāṁsi — some words kṛṇavāvahai — let us talk for some time.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho jāye tiṣṭha tiṣṭha
aho
hello
jāye
O my dear wife
tiṣṭha tiṣṭha
kindly stay, stay
ghore na tyaktum arhasi
ghore
O most cruel one
na
not
tyaktum
to give up
arhasi
you ought
māṁ tvam adyāpy anirvṛtya
mām
me
tvam
you
adya api
until now
anirvṛtya
having not gotten any happiness from me
vacāṁsi kṛṇavāvahai
vacāṁsi
some words
kṛṇavāvahai
let us talk for some time.
O my dear wife, O most cruel one, kindly stay, kindly stay. I know that I have never made you happy until now, but you should not give me up for that reason. This is not proper for you. Even if you have decided to give up my company, let us nonetheless talk for some time.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O my dear wife, O most cruel one! Please stay! Since you are not happy even now, you should not give me up. Let us talk for some time. Even until today you have not been happy. You should not give me up because I did not give you happiness. Another version has anirvṛtyā (having made me lifeless). Even if you leave me, at least we can talk for some time.
Purūravā begs her to stay, admitting he has never truly made her happy. Belated honesty about one's failings is real, but it is rarely sufficient to repair what they caused.
Reflection Questions
  • What belated honesty do I owe a partner — past or current — even knowing it may not undo the damage?
  • Where am I expecting confession alone to function as repair?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.35

↗
सुदेहोऽयं पतत्यत्र देवि दूरं हृतस्त्वया । खादन्त्येनं वृका गृध्रास्त्वत्प्रसादस्य नास्पदम् ॥ ३५ ॥
sudeho ’yaṁ pataty atra
[sudeho ’yam pataty atra]
devi dūraṁ hṛtas tvayā
[devi dooram hritas tvayaa]
khādanty enaṁ vṛkā gṛdhrās
[khaadanty enam vrikaa gridhraas]
tvat-prasādasya nāspadam
[tvat-prasaadasya naaspadam]
su-dehaḥ — very beautiful body ayam — this patati — will now fall down atra — on the spot devi — O Urvaśī dūram — far, far away from home hṛtaḥ — taken away tvayā — by you khādanti — they will eat enam — this (body) vṛkāḥ — foxes gṛdhrāḥ — vultures tvat — your prasādasya — in mercy na — not āspadam — suitable.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sudeho ’yaṁ pataty atra
su-dehaḥ
very beautiful body
devi dūraṁ hṛtas tvayā
ayam
this
khādanty enaṁ vṛkā gṛdhrās
tvat-prasādasya nāspadam
patati
will now fall down
atra
on the spot
devi
O Urvaśī
dūram
far, far away from home
hṛtaḥ
taken away
tvayā
by you
khādanti
they will eat
enam
this (body)
vṛkāḥ
foxes
gṛdhrāḥ
vultures
tvat
your
prasādasya
in mercy
na
not
āspadam
suitable.
O goddess, now that you have refused me, my beautiful body will fall down here, and because it is unsuitable for your pleasure, it will be eaten by foxes and vultures.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O goddess! Now that you have refused me, my beautiful body will fall down here, and because it is not the object of your mercy, it will be eaten by foxes and vultures. He invokes her compassion while she sees him.
He threatens to die so foxes and vultures will eat his body. Manipulative grief — including the threat of self-destruction — is also a temptation that the Bhāgavatam unflinchingly shows.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in past relationships have I used dramatic threats as currency?
  • Whom in my current life is using such currency on me, and what is the right response?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.36

↗
उर्वश्युवाच मा मृथा: पुरुषोऽसि त्वं मा स्म त्वाद्युर्वृका इमे । क्‍वापि सख्यं न वै स्त्रीणां वृकाणां हृदयं यथा ॥ ३६ ॥
urvaśy uvāca
[urvashy uvaacha]
mā mṛthāḥ puruṣo ’si tvaṁ
[maa mrithaah purusho ’si tvam]
mā sma tvādyur vṛkā ime
[maa sma tvaadyur vrikaa ime]
kvāpi sakhyaṁ na vai strīṇāṁ
[kvaapi sakhyam na vai streenaam]
vṛkāṇāṁ hṛdayaṁ yathā
[vrikaanaam hridayam yathaa]
urvaśī uvāca — Urvaśī said mā — do not mṛthāḥ — give up your life puruṣaḥ — male asi — are tvam — you mā sma — do not allow it tvā — unto you adyuḥ — may eat vṛkāḥ — the foxes ime — these senses (do not be under the control of your senses) kva api — anywhere sakhyam — friendship na — not vai — indeed strīṇām — of women vṛkāṇām — of the foxes hṛdayam — the heart yathā — as.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
urvaśy uvāca
urvaśī uvāca
Urvaśī said
mā mṛthāḥ puruṣo ’si tvaṁ
mā
do not
mṛthāḥ
give up your life
puruṣaḥ
male
mā sma tvādyur vṛkā ime
asi
are
tvam
you
mā sma
do not allow it
tvā
unto you
adyuḥ
may eat
vṛkāḥ
the foxes
ime
these senses (do not be under the control of your senses)
kvāpi sakhyaṁ na vai strīṇāṁ
kva api
anywhere
sakhyam
friendship
na
not
vai
indeed
strīṇām
of women
vṛkāṇāṁ hṛdayaṁ yathā
vṛkāṇām
of the foxes
hṛdayam
the heart
yathā
as.
Urvaśī said: My dear King, you are a man, a hero. Don’t be impatient and give up your life. Be sober and don’t allow the senses to overcome you like foxes. Don’t let the foxes eat you. In other words, you should not be controlled by your senses. Rather, you should know that the heart of a woman is like that of a fox. There is no use making friendship with women.

Cāṇakya Paṇḍita has advised, viśvāso naiva kartavyaḥ strīṣu rāja-kuleṣu ca: “Never place your faith in a woman or a politician.” Unless elevated to spiritual consciousness, everyone is conditioned and fallen, what to speak of women, who are less intelligent than men. Women have been compared to śūdras and vaiśyas ( striyo vaiśyās tathā śūdrāḥ ). On the spiritual platform, however, when one is elevated to the platform of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, whether one is a man, woman, śūdra or whatever, everyone is equal. Otherwise, Urvaśī, who was a woman herself and who knew the nature of women, said that a woman’s heart is like that of a sly fox. If a man cannot control his senses, he becomes a victim of such sly foxes. But if one can control the senses, there is no chance of his being victimized by sly, foxlike women. Cāṇakya Paṇḍita has also advised that if one has a wife like a sly fox, he must immediately give up his life at home and go to the forest.

mātā yasya gṛhe nāsti bhāryā cāpriya-vādinī araṇyaṁ tena gantavyaṁ yathāraṇyaṁ tathā gṛham

( Cāṇakya-śloka 57)

Kṛṣṇa conscious gṛhasthas must be very careful of the sly fox woman. If the wife at home is obedient and follows her husband in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, the home is welcome. Otherwise one should give up one’s home and go to the forest.

hitvātma-pātaṁ gṛham andha-kūpaṁ vanaṁ gato yad dharim āśrayeta

( Bhāg. 7.5.5 )

One should go to the forest and take shelter of the lotus feet of Hari, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Urvaśī said: My dear King, you are a man. Do not die. Be sober and don't allow the senses to overcome you like wolves. Don't let the wolves of your senses eat you. Do not make friendship with women who have hearts like wolves’ hearts. Do not die. You are a man. Give up lack of fortitude, the quality of a eunuch. The wolves are the senses. To not let the senses, difficult to control, devour you. Do not have lack of sense control.
Related verses
Urvaśī tells him not to let the 'foxes' of his senses devour him — and warns that a woman's heart is fox-like, so friendship with women is futile. Whatever we make of the cultural claim, the deeper warning is against making the senses our advisor.
Reflection Questions
  • Where are the 'foxes' of my own senses currently eating my higher purpose?
  • Whose advice am I taking that primarily serves my appetites?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.37

↗
स्त्रियो ह्यकरुणा: क्रूरा दुर्मर्षा: प्रियसाहसा: । घ्नन्त्यल्पार्थेऽपि विश्रब्धं पतिं भ्रातरमप्युत ॥ ३७ ॥
striyo hy akaruṇāḥ krūrā
[striyo hy akarunaah krooraa]
durmarṣāḥ priya-sāhasāḥ
[durmarshaah priya-saahasaah]
ghnanty alpārthe ’pi viśrabdhaṁ
[ghnanty alpaarthe ’pi vishrabdham]
patiṁ bhrātaram apy uta
[patim bhraataram apy uta]
striyaḥ — women hi — indeed akaruṇāḥ — merciless krūrāḥ — cunning durmarṣāḥ — intolerant priya-sāhasāḥ — for their own pleasure they can do anything ghnanti — they kill alpa-arthe — for a slight reason api — indeed viśrabdham — faithful patim — husband bhrātaram — brother api — also uta — it is said.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
striyo hy akaruṇāḥ krūrā
striyaḥ
women
hi
indeed
akaruṇāḥ
merciless
krūrāḥ
cunning
durmarṣāḥ priya-sāhasāḥ
durmarṣāḥ
intolerant
priya-sāhasāḥ
for their own pleasure they can do anything
ghnanty alpārthe ’pi viśrabdhaṁ
ghnanti
they kill
alpa-arthe
for a slight reason
patiṁ bhrātaram apy uta
api
indeed
viśrabdham
faithful
patim
husband
bhrātaram
brother
api
also
uta
it is said.
Women as a class are merciless and cunning. They cannot tolerate even a slight offense. For their own pleasure they can do anything irreligious, and therefore they do not fear killing even a faithful husband or brother.

King Purūravā was greatly attached to Urvaśī. Yet despite his faithfulness to her, she had left him. Now, considering that the King was wasting his rarely achieved human form of life, Urvaśī frankly explained the nature of a woman. Because of her nature, a woman can respond to even a slight offense from her husband by not only leaving him but even killing him if required. To say nothing of her husband, she can even kill her brother. That is a woman’s nature. Therefore, in the material world, unless women are trained to be chaste and faithful to their husbands, there cannot be peace or prosperity in society.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Women as a class are merciless, cruel, intolerant, and will do anything for their pleasure. For the slightest reason they will kill a faithful husband or brother. Hear about the nature of women in whom you put your faith and waste your rare human life. She expresses this in two verses. Durmarṣāḥ means women cannot tolerate offense. Priya-sāhasāḥ means they are bold enough to commit sin to get pleasure.
Urvaśī describes women as merciless and cunning, capable of irreligious behavior for their own pleasure. Whatever the era's tone, the underlying caution is against assuming romantic loyalty will be stronger than self-interest.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I assuming loyalty will override a partner's self-interest, against evidence?
  • What structures, not just sentiment, are sustaining my closest bonds?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.38

↗
विधायालीकविश्रम्भमज्ञेषु त्यक्तसौहृदा: । नवं नवमभीप्सन्त्य: पुंश्चल्य: स्वैरवृत्तय: ॥ ३८ ॥
vidhāyālīka-viśrambham
[vidhaayaaleeka-vishrambham]
ajñeṣu tyakta-sauhṛdāḥ
[ajneshu tyakta-sauhridaah]
navaṁ navam abhīpsantyaḥ
[navam navam abheepsantyah]
puṁścalyaḥ svaira-vṛttayaḥ
[pumshchalyah svaira-vrittayah]
vidhāya — by establishing alīka — false viśrambham — faithfulness ajñeṣu — unto the foolish men tyakta-sauhṛdāḥ — who have given up the company of well-wishers navam — new navam — new abhīpsantyaḥ — desiring puṁścalyaḥ — women very easily allured by other men svaira — independently vṛttayaḥ — professional.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vidhāyālīka-viśrambham
vidhāya
by establishing
alīka
false
viśrambham
faithfulness
ajñeṣu tyakta-sauhṛdāḥ
ajñeṣu
unto the foolish men
tyakta-sauhṛdāḥ
who have given up the company of well-wishers
navaṁ navam abhīpsantyaḥ
navam
new
navam
new
abhīpsantyaḥ
desiring
puṁścalyaḥ svaira-vṛttayaḥ
puṁścalyaḥ
women very easily allured by other men
svaira
independently
vṛttayaḥ
professional.
Women are very easily seduced by men. Therefore, polluted women give up the friendship of a man who is their well-wisher and establish false friendship among fools. Indeed, they seek newer and newer friends, one after another.

Because women are easily seduced, the Manu-saṁhitā enjoins that they should not be given freedom. A woman must always be protected, either by her father, by her husband, or by her elderly son. If women are given freedom to mingle with men like equals, which they now claim to be, they cannot keep their propriety. The nature of a woman, as personally described by Urvaśī, is to establish false friendship with someone and then seek new male companions, one after another, even if this means giving up the company of a sincere well-wisher.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Women are prostitutes, independent minded, giving up friendship and establishing false faith among foolish men, desiring new association all the time.
Women are described as easily seduced, abandoning well-wishers for new false friends. The śāstra speaks frankly; the modern reader can mine the underlying principle that unprotected attention drifts toward novelty.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my own attention is novelty winning over fidelity?
  • What structure of protection am I dispensing with under the banner of 'freedom'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.39

↗
संवत्सरान्ते हि भवानेकरात्रं मयेश्वर: । रंस्यत्यपत्यानि च ते भविष्यन्त्यपराणि भो: ॥ ३९ ॥
saṁvatsarānte hi bhavān
[samvatsaraante hi bhavaan]
eka-rātraṁ mayeśvaraḥ
[eka-raatram mayeshvarah]
raṁsyaty apatyāni ca te
[ramsyaty apatyaani cha te]
bhaviṣyanty aparāṇi bhoḥ
[bhavishyanty aparaani bhoh]
saṁvatsara-ante — at the end of every year hi — indeed bhavān — your good self eka-rātram — one night only mayā — with me īśvaraḥ — my husband raṁsyati — will enjoy sex life apatyāni — children ca — also te — your bhaviṣyanti — will generate aparāṇi — others, one after another bhoḥ — O my dear King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
saṁvatsarānte hi bhavān
saṁvatsara-ante
at the end of every year
hi
indeed
bhavān
your good self
eka-rātraṁ mayeśvaraḥ
eka-rātram
one night only
mayā
with me
raṁsyaty apatyāni ca te
bhaviṣyanty aparāṇi bhoḥ
īśvaraḥ
my husband
raṁsyati
will enjoy sex life
apatyāni
children
ca
also
te
your
bhaviṣyanti
will generate
aparāṇi
others, one after another
bhoḥ
O my dear King.
O my dear King, you will be able to enjoy with me as my husband at the end of every year, for one night only. In this way you will have other children, one after another.

Although Urvaśī had adversely explained the nature of woman, Mahārāja Purūravā was very much attached to her, and therefore she wanted to give the King some concession by agreeing to be his wife for one night at the end of each year.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! You will be able to enjoy with me as my husband at the end of every year, for one night only. In this way you will have other children, one after another. Unable to enlighten him, she again pacifies him.
Urvaśī offers him one night per year. Even fleeting access to the beloved becomes precious — and the structure of that one annual night was actually a remarkable concession on her part.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I refusing limited but real access because it is not unlimited?
  • What kind of concession have I been treating as inadequate when it is, in fact, considerable?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.40

↗
अन्तर्वत्नीमुपालक्ष्य देवीं स प्रययौ पुरीम् । पुनस्तत्र गतोऽब्दान्ते उर्वशीं वीरमातरम् ॥ ४० ॥
antarvatnīm upālakṣya
[antarvatneem upaalakshya]
devīṁ sa prayayau purīm
[deveem sa prayayau pureem]
punas tatra gato ’bdānte
[punas tatra gato ’bdaante]
urvaśīṁ vīra-mātaram
[urvasheem veera-maataram]
antarvatnīm — pregnant upālakṣya — by observing devīm — Urvaśī saḥ — he, King Purūravā prayayau — returned purīm — to his palace punaḥ — again tatra — at that very spot gataḥ — went abda-ante — at the end of the year urvaśīm — Urvaśī vīra-mātaram — the mother of one kṣatriya son.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
antarvatnīm upālakṣya
antarvatnīm
pregnant
upālakṣya
by observing
devīṁ sa prayayau purīm
devīm
Urvaśī
saḥ
he, King Purūravā
prayayau
returned
purīm
to his palace
punas tatra gato ’bdānte
punaḥ
again
tatra
at that very spot
gataḥ
went
abda-ante
at the end of the year
urvaśīṁ vīra-mātaram
urvaśīm
Urvaśī
vīra-mātaram
the mother of one kṣatriya son.
Understanding that Urvaśī was pregnant, Purūravā returned to his palace. At the end of the year, there at Kurukṣetra, he again obtained the association of Urvaśī, who was then the mother of a heroic son.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understanding that Urvaśī was pregnant, Purūravā returned to his palace. At the end of the year, there at Kurukṣetra, he again obtained the association of Urvaśī, who was then the mother of a heroic son. He understood she was pregnant because she said she would bear other children.
Pregnant Urvaśī returns at year's end with a heroic son. Even diminished relationships can still produce real fruit — and we should not refuse the fruit because the relationship is not what we wished.
Reflection Questions
  • What fruit have I refused because it came from a less-than-ideal bond?
  • Where could I honor offspring — biological or symbolic — without re-relitigating the parents' arrangement?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.41

↗
उपलभ्य मुदा युक्त: समुवास तया निशाम् । अथैनमुर्वशी प्राह कृपणं विरहातुरम् ॥ ४१ ॥
upalabhya mudā yuktaḥ
[upalabhya mudaa yuktah]
samuvāsa tayā niśām
[samuvaasa tayaa nishaam]
athainam urvaśī prāha
[athainam urvashee praaha]
kṛpaṇaṁ virahāturam
[kripanam virahaaturam]
upalabhya — getting the association mudā — in great jubilation yuktaḥ — being united samuvāsa — enjoyed her company in sex tayā — with her niśām — that night atha — thereafter enam — unto King Purūravā urvaśī — the woman named Urvaśī prāha — said kṛpaṇam — to he who was poor-hearted viraha-āturam — afflicted by the thought of separation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
upalabhya mudā yuktaḥ
upalabhya
getting the association
mudā
in great jubilation
yuktaḥ
being united
samuvāsa tayā niśām
samuvāsa
enjoyed her company in sex
tayā
with her
niśām
that night
athainam urvaśī prāha
atha
thereafter
enam
unto King Purūravā
urvaśī
the woman named Urvaśī
prāha
said
kṛpaṇaṁ virahāturam
kṛpaṇam
to he who was poor-hearted
viraha-āturam
afflicted by the thought of separation.
Having regained Urvaśī at the end of the year, King Purūravā was most jubilant, and he enjoyed her company in sex for one night. But then he was very sorry at the thought of separation from her, so Urvaśī spoke to him as follows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having regained Urvaśī at the end of the year, King Purūravā was most jubilant, and he enjoyed her company for one night. Urvaśī spoke to him, since he was suffering at the thought of separation.
After their one night, separation distresses him again. Periodic access to a beloved often leaves the lover worse off than steady distance — intermittent reinforcement is the most addictive pattern.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I caught in an intermittent pattern that leaves me worse than steady absence would?
  • What clean letting-go might be healthier than this rationed contact?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.42

↗
गन्धर्वानुपधावेमांस्तुभ्यं दास्यन्ति मामिति । तस्य संस्तुवतस्तुष्टा अग्निस्थालीं ददुर्नृप । उर्वशीं मन्यमानस्तां सोऽबुध्यत चरन् वने ॥ ४२ ॥
gandharvān upadhāvemāṁs
[gandharvaan upadhaavemaams]
tubhyaṁ dāsyanti mām iti
[tubhyam daasyanti maam iti]
tasya saṁstuvatas tuṣṭā
[tasya samstuvatas tushtaa]
agni-sthālīṁ dadur nṛpa
[agni-sthaaleem dadur nripa]
urvaśīṁ manyamānas tāṁ
[urvasheem manyamaanas taam]
so ’budhyata caran vane
[so ’budhyata charan vane]
gandharvān — unto the Gandharvas upadhāva — go take shelter imān — these tubhyam — unto you dāsyanti — will deliver mām iti — exactly like me, or me factually tasya — by him saṁstuvataḥ — offering prayers tuṣṭāḥ — being satisfied agni-sthālīm — a girl produced from fire daduḥ — delivered nṛpa — O King urvaśīm — Urvaśī manya-mānaḥ — thinking tām — her saḥ — he (Purūravā) abudhyata — understood factually caran — while walking vane — in the forest.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gandharvān upadhāvemāṁs
gandharvān
unto the Gandharvas
upadhāva
go take shelter
tubhyaṁ dāsyanti mām iti
imān
these
tasya saṁstuvatas tuṣṭā
tubhyam
unto you
agni-sthālīṁ dadur nṛpa
dāsyanti
will deliver
urvaśīṁ manyamānas tāṁ
mām iti
exactly like me, or me factually
tasya
by him
saṁstuvataḥ
offering prayers
tuṣṭāḥ
being satisfied
agni-sthālīm
a girl produced from fire
daduḥ
delivered
nṛpa
O King
urvaśīm
Urvaśī
manya-mānaḥ
thinking
so ’budhyata caran vane
tām
her
saḥ
he (Purūravā)
abudhyata
understood factually
caran
while walking
vane
in the forest.
Urvaśī said: “My dear King, seek shelter of the Gandharvas, for they will be able to deliver me to you again.” In accordance with these words, the King satisfied the Gandharvas by prayers, and the Gandharvas, being pleased with him, gave him an Agnisthālī girl who looked exactly like Urvaśī. Thinking that the girl was Urvaśī, the King began walking with her in the forest, but later he could understand that she was not Urvaśī but Agnisthālī.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura remarks that Purūravā was very lusty. Immediately after getting the Agnisthālī girl, he wanted to have sex with her, but during sexual intercourse he could understand that the girl was Agnisthālī, not Urvaśī. This indicates that every man attached to a particular woman knows the particular characteristics of that woman during sex life. Thus Purūravā understood during sexual intercourse that the Agnisthālī girl was not Urvaśī.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Urvaśī said: "My dear King, seek shelter of the Gandharvas, for they will be able to deliver me to you again." In accordance with these words, the King satisfied the Gandharvas by prayers, and the Gandharvas, being pleased with him, gave him a sacrificial vessel. Thinking that the girl was Urvaśī, the King began walking with her in the forest, but later he could understand that she was not Urvaśī but a vessel. When he praised the Gandharvas, they were pleased with him, and gave him a sacrificial vessel so that he would attain Urvaśī by performing a fire sacrifice. But because of complete infatuation with Urvaśī, blinded by love, he thought that the vessel was Urvaśī. Wandering in the forest with that vessel, when it came to time for sex, he understood it was not her.
Urvaśī sends him to the Gandharvas, who give him an Agnisthālī girl who only looks like her. Lust is satisfied by appearances at first, but the moment of real contact reveals the substitution.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I currently lusting after an appearance that will reveal itself as a substitute on contact?
  • What inner work would prevent the next disappointing 'Agnisthālī' moment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.43

↗
स्थालीं न्यस्य वने गत्वा गृहानाध्यायतो निशि । त्रेतायां सम्प्रवृत्तायां मनसि त्रय्यवर्तत ॥ ४३ ॥
sthālīṁ nyasya vane gatvā
[sthaaleem nyasya vane gatvaa]
gṛhān ādhyāyato niśi
[grihaan aadhyaayato nishi]
tretāyāṁ sampravṛttāyāṁ
[tretaayaam sampravrittaayaam]
manasi trayy avartata
[manasi trayy avartata]
sthālīm — the woman Agnisthālī nyasya — immediately giving up vane — in the forest gatvā — on returning gṛhān — at home ādhyāyataḥ — began to meditate niśi — the whole night tretāyām — when the Tretā millennium sampravṛttāyām — was just on the point of beginning manasi — in his mind trayī — the principles of the three Vedas avartata — became revealed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sthālīṁ nyasya vane gatvā
sthālīm
the woman Agnisthālī
nyasya
immediately giving up
vane
in the forest
gatvā
on returning
gṛhān ādhyāyato niśi
gṛhān
at home
ādhyāyataḥ
began to meditate
niśi
the whole night
tretāyāṁ sampravṛttāyāṁ
tretāyām
when the Tretā millennium
sampravṛttāyām
was just on the point of beginning
manasi trayy avartata
manasi
in his mind
trayī
the principles of the three Vedas
avartata
became revealed.
King Purūravā then left Agnisthālī in the forest and returned home, where he meditated all night upon Urvaśī. In the course of his meditation, the Tretā millennium began, and therefore the principles of the three Vedas, including the process of performing yajña to fulfill fruitive activities, appeared within his heart.

It is said, tretāyāṁ yajato makhaiḥ: in Tretā-yuga, if one performed yajñas, he would get the results of those yajñas. By performing viṣṇu-yajña specifically, one could even achieve the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Of course, yajña is intended to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead. While Purūravā was meditating upon Urvaśī, the Tretā-yuga began, and therefore the Vedic yajñas were revealed in his heart. But Purūravā was a materialistic man, especially interested in enjoying the senses. Yajñas for enjoyment of the senses are called karma-kāṇḍīya-yajñas. Therefore, he decided to perform karma-kāṇḍīya-yajñas to fulfill his lusty desires. In other words, karma-kāṇḍīya-yajñas are meant for sensuous persons, whereas yajña should actually be performed to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead. To please the Supreme Personality of Godhead in Kali-yuga, the saṅkīrtana-yajña is recommended. Yajñaiḥ saṅkīrtana-prāyair yajanti hi sumedhasaḥ. Only those who are very intelligent take to saṅkīrtana-yajña to fulfill all their desires, material and spiritual, whereas those who are lusty for sense enjoyment perform karma-kāṇḍīya-yajñas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Purūravā then left the vessel in the forest and returned home, where he meditated all night upon Urvaśī. In the course of his meditation, Tretā-yuga began, and therefore the principles of the three Vedas, including the process of performing sacrifice, appeared. While he meditated intensely on Urvaśī all (ā) night, Tretā-yuga began, and the three Vedas which teach karma manifested. This indicates that karma is for persons with material desires.
Returning home, he meditates all night on Urvaśī, and the principles of yajṣa appear in his heart. Even intense attachment, brought into stillness, can become the doorway through which spiritual knowledge enters.
Reflection Questions
  • What strong feeling could I, instead of acting out, sit with long enough to receive guidance?
  • Where might my obsession be the raw material for an insight if I let it ripen in silence?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.44-45

↗
स्थालीस्थानं गतोऽश्वत्थं शमीगर्भं विलक्ष्य स: । तेन द्वे अरणी कृत्वा उर्वशीलोककाम्यया ॥ ४४ ॥ उर्वशीं मन्त्रतो ध्यायन्नधरारणिमुत्तराम् । आत्मानमुभयोर्मध्ये यत् तत् प्रजननं प्रभु: ॥ ४५ ॥
sthālī-sthānaṁ gato ’śvatthaṁ
[sthaalee-sthaanam gato ’shvattham]
śamī-garbhaṁ vilakṣya saḥ
[shamee-garbham vilakshya sah]
tena dve araṇī kṛtvā
[tena dve aranee kritvaa]
urvaśī-loka-kāmyayā
[urvashee-loka-kaamyayaa]
urvaśīṁ mantrato dhyāyann
[urvasheem mantrato dhyaayann]
adharāraṇim uttarām
[adharaaranim uttaraam]
ātmānam ubhayor madhye
[aatmaanam ubhayor madhye]
yat tat prajananaṁ prabhuḥ
[yat tat prajananam prabhuh]
sthālī-sthānam — the place where Agnisthālī was left gataḥ — going there aśvattham — an aśvattha tree śamī-garbham — produced from the womb of the śamī tree vilakṣya — seeing saḥ — he, Purūravā tena — from that dve — two araṇī — pieces of wood required for igniting a fire for sacrifice kṛtvā — making urvaśī-loka-kāmyayā — desiring to go to the planet where Urvaśī was present urvaśīm — Urvaśī mantrataḥ — by chanting the required mantra dhyāyan — meditating upon adhara — lower araṇim — araṇi wood uttarām — and the upper one ātmānam — himself ubhayoḥ madhye — in between the two yat tat — that which (he meditated upon) prajananam — as a son prabhuḥ — the King.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sthālī-sthānaṁ gato ’śvatthaṁ
sthālī-sthānam
the place where Agnisthālī was left
gataḥ
going there
śamī-garbhaṁ vilakṣya saḥ
aśvattham
an aśvattha tree
śamī-garbham
produced from the womb of the śamī tree
vilakṣya
seeing
saḥ
he, Purūravā
tena dve araṇī kṛtvā
tena
from that
dve
two
araṇī
pieces of wood required for igniting a fire for sacrifice
kṛtvā
making
urvaśī-loka-kāmyayā
urvaśī-loka-kāmyayā
desiring to go to the planet where Urvaśī was present
urvaśīṁ mantrato dhyāyann
urvaśīm
Urvaśī
mantrataḥ
by chanting the required mantra
dhyāyan
meditating upon
adharāraṇim uttarām
adhara
lower
araṇim
araṇi wood
uttarām
and the upper one
ātmānam ubhayor madhye
ātmānam
himself
ubhayoḥ madhye
in between the two
yat tat prajananaṁ prabhuḥ
yat tat
that which (he meditated upon)
prajananam
as a son
prabhuḥ
the King.
When the process of fruitive yajña became manifest within his heart, King Purūravā went to the same spot where he had left Agnisthālī. There he saw that from the womb of a śamī tree, an aśvattha tree had grown. He then took a piece of wood from that tree and made it into two araṇis. Desiring to go to the planet where Urvaśī resided, he chanted mantras, meditating upon the lower araṇi as Urvaśī, the upper one as himself, and the piece of wood between them as his son. In this way he began to ignite a fire.

The Vedic fire for performing yajña was not ignited with ordinary matches or similar devices. Rather, the Vedic sacrificial fire was ignited by the araṇis, or two sacred pieces of wood, which produced fire by friction with a third. Such a fire is necessary for the performance of yajña. If successful, a yajña will fulfill the desire of its performer. Thus Purūravā took advantage of the process of yajña to fulfill his lusty desires. He thought of the lower araṇi as Urvaśī, the upper one as himself, and the middle one as his son. A relevant Vedic mantra quoted herein by Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura is śamī-garbhād agniṁ mantha. A similar mantra is urvaśyām urasi purūravāḥ. Purūravā wanted to have children continuously by the womb of Urvaśī. His only ambition was to have sex life with Urvaśī and thereby get a son. In other words, he had so much lust in his heart that even while performing yajña he thought of Urvaśī, instead of thinking of the master of yajña, Yajñeśvara, Lord Viṣṇu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Purūravā went to the same spot where he had left the vessel. There he saw that from the womb of a śamī tree, an aśvattha tree had grown. He then took a piece of wood from that tree and made it into two kindling sticks. Desiring to go to the planet where Urvaśī resided, he chanted mantras, meditating upon the lower stick as Urvaśī, the upper one as himself, and the piece of wood between them as his son. He went to the place where he left the vessel, a place known as Chokara. Seeing an aśvattha tree growing from a śamī tree, from the aśvattha wood he made two kindling sticks and kindled fire. Śruti says śamīgarbhād agnim mamantha: from the womb of śamī wood he kindled fire. The process of kindling is described. Meditating on the lower stick as Urvaśī and the upper stick as himself, and the wood between them as his offspring, he kindled. The mantra he chanted begins urvaśyām urasi purūravā.
He carves araṇis from an aśvattha-growing-in-śamī tree, treats them as Urvaśī, himself, and son, and ignites yajṣa fire. Even longing for a beloved can be translated into the sacred fire of sacrifice — symbolism elevated to ritual.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life could become ritual rather than craving?
  • Where could I treat what I love as ingredients for offering rather than as ends in themselves?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.46

↗
तस्य निर्मन्थनाज्जातो जातवेदा विभावसु: । त्रय्या स विद्यया राज्ञा पुत्रत्वे कल्पितस्त्रिवृत् ॥ ४६ ॥
tasya nirmanthanāj jāto
[tasya nirmanthanaaj jaato]
jāta-vedā vibhāvasuḥ
[jaata-vedaa vibhaavasuh]
trayyā sa vidyayā rājñā
[trayyaa sa vidyayaa raajnaa]
putratve kalpitas tri-vṛt
[putratve kalpitas tri-vrit]
tasya — of Purūravā nirmanthanāt — because of interaction jātaḥ — was born jāta-vedāḥ — meant for material enjoyment according to the Vedic principles vibhāvasuḥ — a fire trayyā — following the Vedic principles saḥ — the fire vidyayā — by such a process rājñā — by the King putratve — a son’s being born kalpitaḥ — it so became tri-vṛt — the three letters a-u-m combined together as om..
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tasya nirmanthanāj jāto
tasya
of Purūravā
nirmanthanāt
because of interaction
jātaḥ
was born
jāta-vedā vibhāvasuḥ
jāta-vedāḥ
meant for material enjoyment according to the Vedic principles
vibhāvasuḥ
a fire
trayyā sa vidyayā rājñā
trayyā
following the Vedic principles
saḥ
the fire
vidyayā
by such a process
rājñā
by the King
putratve kalpitas tri-vṛt
putratve
a son’s being born
kalpitaḥ
it so became
tri-vṛt
the three letters a-u-m combined together as om..
From Purūravā’s rubbing of the araṇis came a fire. By such a fire one can achieve all success in material enjoyment and be purified in seminal birth, initiation and in the performance of sacrifice, which are invoked with the combined letters a-u-m. Thus the fire was considered the son of King Purūravā.

According to the Vedic process, one can get a son through semen ( śukra ), one can get a bona fide disciple through initiation ( sāvitra ), or one can get a son or disciple through the fire of sacrifice ( yajña ). Thus when Mahārāja Purūravā generated the fire by rubbing the araṇis, the fire became his son. Either by semen, by initiation or by yajña one may get a son. The Vedic mantra oṁkāra, or praṇava, consisting of the letters a-u-m, can call each of these three methods into existence. Therefore the words nirmanthanāj jātaḥ indicate that by the rubbing of the araṇis a son was born.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
From Purūravā's rubbing of the sticks came a fire. By such a fire one can achieve enjoyable objects. Purified by the knowledge of the three Vedas, the fire was considered the son for the King and took three forms. From rubbing the sticks together he produced the fire, which then produced enjoyable objects (dhanam). The fire was purified by the knowledge of the three Vedas, and was thought of as a son for the King, since it allowed him to go to Svarga. Trivṛt means the fire in three forms: āhavanīya, gārhapātya and dakṣiṇāgni.
The fire produced from those rubbings becomes a kind of son to Purūravā — fire-born offspring through yajṣa is recognized alongside seminal and initiated sons. Spiritual fatherhood through sacred work is just as real as biological.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose spiritual father or mother am I positioned to become through service and sacrifice?
  • Where am I limiting my generativity to biology when fire-and-yajṣa parenthood is also available?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.47

↗
तेनायजत यज्ञेशं भगवन्तमधोक्षजम् । उर्वशीलोकमन् विच्छन्सर्वदेवमयं हरिम् ॥ ४७ ॥
tenāyajata yajñeśaṁ
[tenaayajata yajnesham]
bhagavantam adhokṣajam
[bhagavantam adhokshajam]
urvaśī-lokam anvicchan
[urvashee-lokam anvichchan]
sarva-devamayaṁ harim
[sarva-devamayam harim]
tena — by generating such a fire ayajata — he worshiped yajña-īśam — the master or enjoyer of the yajña bhagavantam — the Supreme Personality of Godhead adhokṣajam — beyond the perception of the senses urvaśī-lokam — to the planet where Urvaśī was staying anvicchan — although desiring to go sarva-deva-mayam — the reservoir of all demigods harim — the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tenāyajata yajñeśaṁ
tena
by generating such a fire
ayajata
he worshiped
yajña-īśam
the master or enjoyer of the yajña
bhagavantam adhokṣajam
bhagavantam
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
adhokṣajam
beyond the perception of the senses
urvaśī-lokam anvicchan
urvaśī-lokam
to the planet where Urvaśī was staying
anvicchan
although desiring to go
sarva-devamayaṁ harim
sarva-deva-mayam
the reservoir of all demigods
harim
the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
By means of that fire, Purūravā, who desired to go to the planet where Urvaśī resided, performed a sacrifice, by which he satisfied the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Hari, the enjoyer of the results of sacrifice. Thus he worshiped the Lord, who is beyond the perception of the senses and is the reservoir of all the demigods.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā, bhoktāraṁ yajña-tapasāṁ sarva-loka-maheśvaram: any loka, or planet, to which one wants to go is the property of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the enjoyer of the performance of sacrifice. The purpose of yajña is to satisfy the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In this age, as we have explained many times, the yajña of chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra is the only sacrifice that can satisfy the Supreme Lord. When the Lord is satisfied, one can fulfill any desire, material or spiritual. Bhagavad-gītā (3.14) also says, yajñād bhavati parjanyaḥ: by offering sacrifices to Lord Viṣṇu, one can have sufficient rainfall. When there is sufficient rainfall, the earth becomes fit to produce everything ( sarva-kāma-dughā mahī ). If one can utilize the land properly, one can get all the necessities of life from the land, including food grains, fruits, flowers and vegetables. Everything one gets for material wealth is produced from the earth, and therefore it is said, sarva-kāma-dughā mahī ( Bhāg. 1.10.4 ). Everything is possible by performing yajña. Therefore although Purūravā desired something material, he factually performed yajña to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Lord is adhokṣaja, beyond the perception of Purūravā and everyone else. Consequently, some kind of yajña must be performed to fulfill the desires of the living entity. Yajñas can be performed in human society only when society is divided by varṇāśrama-dharma into four varṇas and four āśramas. Without such a regulative process, no one can perform yajñas, and without the performance of yajñas, no material plans can make human society happy at any time. Everyone should therefore be induced to perform yajñas. In this Age of Kali, the yajña recommended is saṅkīrtana, the individual or collective chanting of the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra. This will bring the fulfillment of all necessities for human society.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
By means of that fire, Purūravā, who desired to go to the planet where Urvaśī resided, performed a sacrifice, by which he satisfied the Supreme Lord, master of sacrifices, who is beyond material senses and constitutes all the devatās.
Related verses
By that fire he performs sacrifice and satisfies Hari, who is the actual proprietor of every loka. Whatever the apparent goal, sincere yajṣa pleases the Supreme — and that is what really opens any door.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose pleasure am I actually targeting in my efforts to reach a particular 'loka' of my own?
  • How could I refocus my outcome-seeking on pleasing the proprietor instead of grabbing the property?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.48

↗
एक एव पुरा वेद: प्रणव: सर्ववाङ्‌मय: । देवो नारायणो नान्य एकोऽग्निर्वर्ण एव च ॥ ४८ ॥
eka eva purā vedaḥ
[eka eva puraa vedah]
praṇavaḥ sarva-vāṅmayaḥ
[pranavah sarva-vaanmayah]
devo nārāyaṇo nānya
[devo naaraayano naanya]
eko ’gnir varṇa eva ca
[eko ’gnir varna eva cha]
ekaḥ — only one eva — indeed purā — formerly vedaḥ — book of transcendental knowledge praṇavaḥ — oṁkāra sarva-vāk-mayaḥ — consisting of all Vedic mantras devaḥ — the Lord, God nārāyaṇaḥ — only Nārāyaṇa (was worshipable in the Satya-yuga) na anyaḥ — no other ekaḥ agniḥ — one division only for agni varṇaḥ — order of life eva ca — and certainly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eka eva purā vedaḥ
ekaḥ
only one
eva
indeed
purā
formerly
vedaḥ
book of transcendental knowledge
praṇavaḥ sarva-vāṅmayaḥ
praṇavaḥ
oṁkāra
sarva-vāk-mayaḥ
consisting of all Vedic mantras
devo nārāyaṇo nānya
devaḥ
the Lord, God
nārāyaṇaḥ
only Nārāyaṇa (was worshipable in the Satya-yuga)
na anyaḥ
no other
eko ’gnir varṇa eva ca
ekaḥ agniḥ
one division only for agni
varṇaḥ
order of life
eva ca
and certainly.
In the Satya-yuga, the first millennium, all the Vedic mantras were included in one mantra — praṇava, the root of all Vedic mantras. In other words, the Atharva Veda alone was the source of all Vedic knowledge. The Supreme Personality of Godhead Nārāyaṇa was the only worshipable Deity; there was no recommendation for worship of the demigods. Fire was one only, and the only order of life in human society was known as haṁsa.

In Satya-yuga there was only one Veda, not four. Later, before the beginning of Kali-yuga, this one Veda, the Atharva Veda (or, some say, the Yajur Veda ), was divided into four — Sāma, Yajur, Ṛg and Atharva — for the facility of human society. In Satya-yuga the only mantra was oṁkāra ( oṁ tat sat ). The same name oṁkāra is manifest in the mantra Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare/ Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare. Unless one is a brāhmaṇa, one cannot utter oṁkāra and get the desired result. But in Kali-yuga almost everyone is a śūdra, unfit for pronouncing the praṇava, oṁkāra. Therefore the śāstras have recommended the chanting of the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra. Oṁkāra is a mantra, or mahā-mantra, and Hare Kṛṣṇa is also a mahā-mantra. The purpose of pronouncing oṁkāra is to address the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva ( oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya ). And the purpose of chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra is the same. Hare: “O energy of the Lord!” Kṛṣṇa: “O Lord Kṛṣṇa!” Hare: “O energy of the Lord!” Rāma: “O Supreme Lord, O supreme enjoyer!” The only worshipable Lord is Hari, who is the goal of the Vedas ( vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ ). By worshiping the demigods, one worships the different parts of the Lord, just as one might water the branches and twigs of a tree. But worshiping Nārāyaṇa, the all-inclusive Supreme Personality of Godhead, is like pouring water on the root of the tree, thus supplying water to the trunk, branches, twigs, leaves and so on. In Satya-yuga people knew how to fulfill the necessities of life simply by worshiping Nārāyaṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The same purpose can be served in this Age of Kali by the chanting of the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra, as recommended in the Bhāgavatam. Kīrtanād eva kṛṣṇasya mukta-saṅgaḥ paraṁ vrajet. Simply by chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra, one becomes free from the bondage of material existence and thus becomes eligible to return home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Previously there was one Veda, and oṁ was the principal mantra. Nārāyaṇa was the only deity. There was one fire and one varṇa. “Was the method of karma mentioned in the three Vedas not existing previously?” It was not revealed previously. The verses explain the situation. Previously, in Satya-yuga, oṁ was the seed of all verses. There was one Veda, and Nārāyaṇa was the one deity. There was one fire (not three), and one varṇa called hamṣa, since generally everyone was predominantly in sattva-guṇa, engaged in meditation.
In Satya-yuga there was one Veda, one mantra (oṁ), one Deity (Nārāyaṇa), one fire, and one āśrama (haṁsa). Original spirituality is radically simple — multiplications came later as accommodations for our complexity.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could my own spiritual life be simplified toward 'one' instead of further fragmented?
  • What single mantra and single Lord could I anchor my day around?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.14.49

↗
पुरूरवस एवासीत् त्रयी त्रेतामुखे नृप । अग्निना प्रजया राजा लोकं गान्धर्वमेयिवान् ॥ ४९ ॥
purūravasa evāsīt
[purooravasa evaaseet]
trayī tretā-mukhe nṛpa
[trayee tretaa-mukhe nripa]
agninā prajayā rājā
[agninaa prajayaa raajaa]
lokaṁ gāndharvam eyivān
[lokam gaandharvam eyivaan]
purūravasaḥ — from King Purūravā eva — thus āsīt — there was trayī — the Vedic principles of karma, jñāna and upāsanā tretā-mukhe — in the beginning of the Tretā-yuga nṛpa — O King Parīkṣit agninā — simply by generating the fire of sacrifice prajayā — by his son rājā — King Purūravā lokam — to the planet gāndharvam — of the Gandharvas eyivān — achieved.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
purūravasa evāsīt
purūravasaḥ
from King Purūravā
eva
thus
āsīt
there was
trayī tretā-mukhe nṛpa
trayī
the Vedic principles of karma, jñāna and upāsanā
tretā-mukhe
in the beginning of the Tretā-yuga
nṛpa
O King Parīkṣit
agninā prajayā rājā
agninā
simply by generating the fire of sacrifice
prajayā
by his son
rājā
King Purūravā
lokaṁ gāndharvam eyivān
lokam
to the planet
gāndharvam
of the Gandharvas
eyivān
achieved.
O Mahārāja Parīkṣit, at the beginning of Tretā-yuga, King Purūravā inaugurated a karma-kāṇḍa sacrifice. Thus Purūravā, who considered the yajñic fire his son, was able to go to Gandharvaloka as he desired.

In Satya-yuga, Lord Nārāyaṇa was worshiped by meditation ( kṛte yad dhyāyato viṣṇum ). Indeed, everyone always meditated upon Lord Viṣṇu, Nārāyaṇa, and achieved every success by this process of meditation. In the next yuga, Tretā-yuga, the performance of yajña began ( tretāyāṁ yajato mukhaiḥ ). Therefore this verse says, trayī tretā-mukhe. Ritualistic ceremonies are generally called fruitive activities. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura says that in Tretā-yuga, beginning in the Svāyambhuva-manvantara, ritualistic fruitive activities were similarly manifested from Priyavrata, etc.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Ninth Canto, Fourteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “King Purūravā Enchanted by Urvaśī.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O king! At the beginning of Tretā-yuga, King Purūravā inaugurated karma-kāṇḍa sacrifice. Thus Purūravā, by sacrifice, was able to go to Gandharvaloka. At the beginning of Tretā-yuga in Svāyambhuva Manvantara, the path of karma was started by Purūravā starting. It should be understood that the path of karma was introduced at the beginning of each Tretā-yuga by different kings such as Priyavarta in the cycle of four yugas. Thus ends the commentary on the Fourteenth Chapter of the Ninth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Fifteen Paraśurāma Kills Kārtavīryārjuna
At Tretā's beginning, Purūravā inaugurates karma-kāṇḍa sacrifice and travels to Gandharvaloka. The age conditions the method — what works in Tretā may not be ideal in Kali, where the holy name is recommended.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I trying to do Tretā-yuga practices in Kali-yuga conditions?
  • Where could I shift more decisively to nāma-saṅkīrtana as the age's prescribed remedy?
📝 My note