FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

1.8 · Prayers by Queen Kuntī and Parīkṣit Saved

52 verses · 🖨 Class prep
L Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (16510 chars)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

L - Love (7-11)

L - Love (7-11) Srimad-Bhagavatam’s purpose is to assist the reader in reawakening pure love of Krishna, which is lying dormant within everyone’s heart. Suta Goswami described the remarkable devotees who preceded Maharaja Pariksit, and the spotless devotion they exuded. The examples of Uttara, the Pandavas, Kunti and Bhismadeva highlight the loving surrender that Krishna’s devotees embody, and the intimate reciprocation that He graciously extends. In their exchanges with Krishna, many beautiful prayers are recited ( stuti ), which attract the mercy of the Lord ( kripa ) and help the devotee reawaken pure love ( rati ).

Previous The Narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam Next The Love of Arjuna Last updated 1 year ago

Pure Love

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love “The ultimate result of devotional service is to develop genuine love for the Supreme Personality. Love is a word which is often used in relation with man and woman. And love is the only word that can be properly used to indicate the relation between Lord Krishna and the living entities. The living entities are mentioned as prakrti in the Bhagavad-gita, and in Sanskrit prakrti is a feminine object. The Lord is always described as the parama-purusa , or the supreme male personality. Thus the affection between the Lord and the living entities is something like that between the male and the female. Therefore the term love of Godhead is quite appropriate.” (SB 1.7.7) Industries thrive on it, popstars sing about it, teenagers dream about it, and people are willing to do practically anything for it. To love and be loved - the everlasting, universal dream. Though we wholeheartedly endeavour for that perfect connection in our material sojourn, for the most part it’s a letdown, and the story of life is more a case of frustrated love. Srimad-Bhagavatam introduces us to a world of pure and selfless loving relationships. Because the accounts of loving exchange are so rich, Srimad-Bhagavatam is described as rasamalayam , ‘the abode of loving relish.’ The narrations described in this section give us an insight into these divine exchanges. In Gopala Champu, Jiva Goswami states that hearing of the love exchanged between Krishna and His devotees helps awaken a similar love within the heart of the sincere hearer. When the innate desire for loving connection is reposed in Krishna, everything makes perfect sense, we reconnect with our true purpose and life becomes full of joy and happiness. Some think of God as a strict and unforgiving judge; the old man who sits on a grand throne and hurls down thunderbolts every time someone deviates. Others consider Him a crutch for the weak; an imaginary being who brings peace, hope and comfort, but has little to do with objective reality. Some think of God as a mythological tool of the power-hungry elite, used to keep the masses in line and maintain the status quo. For many, God is simply the cosmic order supplier; a convenient port of call in times of need and want. The Vedic writings paint a radically different picture. Their extraordinary revelation is not simply that God exists, but that He is bursting with colour, character and bliss. According to the Taittiriya Upanisad (2.7.1), God is ‘ raso vai sah ’ – the perfect embodiment of affectionate relationships, loving relish and transcendental sweetness.

Previous The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Next Rasa Theology Last updated 1 year ago

Our Relationship with Krishna

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Our Relationship with Krishna The narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam are an inspiration to revive our own connection with Krishna, who is ever-awaiting the opportunity to engage in relationships of pure love with His devotees. Though Krishna receives the love of unlimited associates, He still considers our love for him so invaluable and indispensable that He yearns for the living entity to reconnect with Him, and personally descends to the world to make all arrangements to that end. Srila Prabhupada explains: “In the spiritual world there are five kinds of relationships with the Supreme Lord - s anta, dasya, sakhya, vatsalya and madhurya . The perverted reflections of these rasas are found in the material world. Land, home, furniture and other inert material objects are related in santa , or the neutral and silent sense, whereas servants work in the dasya relationship. The reciprocation between friends is called sakhya , the affection of a parent for a child is known as vatsalya , and the affairs of conjugal love constitute madhurya . These five relationships in the material world are distorted reflections of the original, pure sentiments, which should be understood and perfected in relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead under the guidance of a bona fide spiritual master. In the material world the perverted rasas bring frustration. If these rasas are re- established with Lord Krishna, the result is eternal, blissful life.” ( CC Adi 1.56 ) By diligently chanting the holy names of Krishna, as outlined by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, anyone can purify their heart and reawaken their original spiritual form ( svarupa ) and relationship with the Lord. We hold back in the relationships of this world because we are uncertain of how others will reciprocate with our love. Furthermore, we are reticent about investing too much in an individual, since it may damage other relationships. When we direct our love towards Krishna, however, we can rest assured that He’ll generously and unfailingly reciprocate with every single endeavour we make. In addition, by nurturing our love for Krishna we automatically develop our love for everyone else, since all living entities are eternally and intimately connected with Him.

Previous Rasa Theology Next A - Attaining the Absolute (12-15) Last updated 1 year ago

Rasa Theology

L - Love (7-11) Pure Love Rasa Theology Rupa Goswami, the leading disciple of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, dissected the vast theology of rasa (loving relish) and systematically presented it in his masterpiece known as the Bhakti-rasamrita Sindhu, literally translated as the ‘Nectarean ocean of devotional sentiments.’ Drawing from the Sanskrit dramaturgy of Bharata Muni, Rupa Goswami analyses the subtle loving feelings that souls experience in a variety of relationships with Krishna. Just as a full meal contains salty, spicy, pungent and sweet preparations, all combining to give a complete experience, so the various tastes of rasa create a unique spiritual experience. Rupa Goswami poetically compares the devotees of the Lord to sharks ( makara ) who swim deep in this ocean of love, oblivious to the small rivers of spiritual side benefits (like liberation from suffering). Whilst swimming in the oceanic relationship with Krishna, they find the most valuable of jewels in the depths of the seabed. The love experienced between the living entity and God can take many forms, each with unique intensities. To enter such exchanges, one must first become entirely averse to the allure of material pleasures, which block one’s ability to enter the arena of pure spiritual love. In the early stages of spirituality, one may gravitate towards an impersonal conception of the Supreme. God is seen as an energy, consciousness or all-pervading influence. True love, however, is experienced between persons, where there is opportunity for interaction, exchange and an active reciprocation. Though the Lord is the complete whole, both personal and impersonal, His Supreme personal feature invites a more intimate relationship where deeper emotions can be experienced. The Personality of Godhead manifests Himself in a variety of forms. Vishnu is God at work – the personality who creates and maintains the entire cosmos. Krishna, on the other hand, is God at home – the personality who is more concerned with intimate relationships and loving interactions. Thus, according to rasa theology, a more intimate connection can be established with Krishna. Amongst devotees of Krishna, there are also variations. Some focus on His majestic qualities and awe-inspiring opulence and power ( aisvarya ). Their understanding gives rise to a mood of respect and reverence, which invariably creates a distance too. Those who focus on Krishna’s sweetness ( madhurya ), captured by His irresistible beauty and charm, transcend such barriers and enter into closer exchanges. Of such confidential devotees, there are those who are in union with Krishna and experience the ecstasy of meeting Him face-to-face ( sambhoga ). Other devotees, however, are subjected to separation from Krishna ( vipralambha ). Their desperation and anticipation to meet Him creates a heightened emotional churning and unrelenting yearning. The gopis of Vrindavana are the prime example of this. Their feelings of transcendental separation are considered the epitome of divine love for God [ 3 ].

Previous Pure Love Next Our Relationship with Krishna Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Arjuna

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Arjuna Chapter 7 Having answered the first query, Suta Goswami turns his attention to the second question of the sages: “How was Sukadeva Goswami viewed by others, and how did his meeting with Maharaja Pariksit transpire?” Before directly addressing this, Suta Goswami narrated the events which transpired at the conclusion of the Kuruksetra battle, which is when Maharaja Pariksit was born. When Asvatthama was being chased by Arjuna due to his heinous act of killing the sleeping sons of Draupadi, he released a deadly brahmastra weapon in a frenzy of panic. Arjuna was startled and confused, unsure of what his next move should be. Since surrendered devotees see the Lord as their only protector, Arjuna instinctively approached Krishna in his time of need and sought counsel. Though in the most intense of situations, Arjuna lovingly glorified Krishna and expressed his full dependence upon Him. Taking Krishna’s advice, Arjuna counteracted Asvatthama’s weapon with his own brahmastra and thus captured the ruthless warrior. There were conflicting proposals as to what Asvatthama’s fate should be – some called for his death while others wanted to spare him. Arjuna ingeniously cut the jewel and hair from Asvatthama’s head. The warrior was utterly humiliated but still alive, and Arjuna successfully reconciled all the different opinions by simultaneously ‘killing’ him and sparing his life.

Previous L - Love (7-11) Next The Love of Uttara Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Bhismadeva

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Bhismadeva Chapter 9 Overwhelmed and traumatised by the massacre that had occurred at Kuruksetra, Maharaja Yuddhistira went to visit Bhismadeva, accompanied by Krishna and the Pandavas. Lying on the bed of arrows, Bhismadeva praised the Pandavas for patiently tolerating so many devious intrigues and grievous injustices. Despite their piety, knowledge, strength, righteousness, and having Krishna as their constant companion, the Pandavas were not exempt from difficulties. The divine plans of the Lord, Bhismadeva said, are practically impossible to decode. With deep gratitude and appreciation, Bhismadeva beautifully glorified Krishna and expressed his incomparable fortune at having the Supreme Lord present during his final hours. The legendary grandsire imparted his concluding words of wisdom to Maharaja Yuddhistira, offering a variety of profound insights on the duties of human beings ( dharma ) in various contexts of life. Immersing his consciousness in Krishna, he offered his deep appreciation to the Lord and prayed for the ability to remember Him at death. Bhismadeva thus departed this mortal world in perfect consciousness. His spiritual purity transported him to the Lord’s abode. With the historic departure of Bhismadeva, Maharaja Yuddhistira was duly enthroned as the next leader.

Previous The Love of Kunti Next The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Chapter 11 The separation in Hastinapura was contrasted with a jubilant meeting in Dwaraka. In that city of immeasurable opulence, all the inhabitants excitedly welcomed Krishna and offered Him an abundance of gifts in great love. Krishna was reunited with His parents, Vasudeva and Devaki, and bowed down to them with great affection. When Krishna entered the palaces of His 16,108 queens, they were completely overwhelmed at the sight of their Lord and husband, and a variety of loving sentiments arose within them. They embraced Krishna in their hearts, with their eyes, and through their sons. Even prostitutes and outcastes lovingly greeted Krishna, who, being equally affectionate to all, unhesitatingly reciprocated with each and everyone’s devotion.

Previous The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Next Pure Love Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation)

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Hastinapura’s Residents (Separation) Chapter 10 Having remained in Hastinapura for a few months, Krishna decided it was time to leave. As He departed, the ladies began crying profusely, while other residents of Hastinapura nearly fainted from the feelings of impending separation. Their hearts were melting in the pot of attraction for Krishna. Such are the intense emotions of Krishna’s pure devotees. Maharaja Yuddhistira provided Krishna with martial protection and the Pandavas followed along as far as they could to see Him off. It was an agonising departure. In separation, lovers feel one moment to be like millions of years. This unique type of emotion, known as vipralambha-bhava , paradoxically generates the most intense connection with Krishna.

Previous The Love of Bhismadeva Next The Love of Dwaraka’s Residents (Union) Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Kunti

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Kunti Chapter 8 Having witnessed yet another exhibition of Krishna’s love, compassion and unrelenting protection, Queen Kunti offered a garland of celebrated prayers. She glorified the wonderful guardianship that Krishna offers His devotees, but simultaneously prayed for further calamities, which help the sincere devotee to remember Him. The exalted Queen expressed how true devotion is born in the hearts of those who are materially exhausted, praying that her affectionate family ties would not hinder her spiritual progress. She praised the Lord’s divine appearance, which creates a spiritual resurgence, but lamented the impending separation from Krishna. That Queen Kunti never lost faith in Krishna, despite so many catastrophic reversals, indicates the incomparable degree of love and devotion that she exuded.

Previous The Love of Uttara Next The Love of Bhismadeva Last updated 1 year ago

The Love of Uttara

L - Love (7-11) The Love of Uttara Chapter 8 Following this incident, Krishna performed the funeral rites for the countless soldiers who died in the battle of Kuruksetra. The Lord then prepared to leave for Dwaraka. Just then, Asvatthama directed another deadly brahmastra toward the pregnant Uttara (wife of Abhimanyu, Arjuna’s son) in a last-gasp attempt to terminate the final heir in the Pandava dynasty. Another shocking reversal! Though personally detached from the impending danger, Uttara desperately begged Krishna to save the child in her womb. Just like Arjuna, she knew only Krishna as the Supreme controller and the Supreme friend. Always ready to serve His unalloyed devotees, Krishna, as Paramatma (Supersoul in the heart), covered and protected the embryo with His personal energy, and simultaneously foiled the brahmastra weapon.

Previous The Love of Arjuna Next The Love of Kunti Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.1

↗
सूत उवाच अथ ते सम्परेतानां स्वानामुदकमिच्छताम् । दातुं सकृष्णा गङ्गायां पुरस्कृत्य ययु: स्त्रिय: ॥ १ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
atha te samparetānāṁ
[atha te samparetaanaam]
svānām udakam icchatām
[svaanaam udakam ichchataam]
dātuṁ sakṛṣṇā gaṅgāyāṁ
[daatum sakrishnaa gangaayaam]
puraskṛtya yayuḥ striyaḥ
[puraskritya yayuh striyah]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta said atha — thus te — the Pāṇḍavas samparetānām — of the dead svānām — of the relatives udakam — water icchatām — willing to have dātum — to deliver sa-kṛṣṇāḥ — along with Draupadī gaṅgāyām — on the Ganges puraskṛtya — putting in the front yayuḥ — went striyaḥ — the women.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta said
atha te samparetānāṁ
atha
thus
te
the Pāṇḍavas
samparetānām
of the dead
svānām udakam icchatām
svānām
of the relatives
udakam
water
icchatām
willing to have
dātuṁ sakṛṣṇā gaṅgāyāṁ
dātum
to deliver
sa-kṛṣṇāḥ
along with Draupadī
gaṅgāyām
on the Ganges
puraskṛtya yayuḥ striyaḥ
puraskṛtya
putting in the front
yayuḥ
went
striyaḥ
the women.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thereafter the Pāṇḍavas, desiring to deliver water to the dead relatives who had desired it, went to the Ganges with Draupadī. The ladies walked in front.

To date it is the custom in Hindu society to go to the Ganges or any other sacred river to take bath when death occurs in the family. Each of the family members pours out a potful of the Ganges water for the departed soul and walks in a procession, with the ladies in the front. The Pāṇḍavas also followed the rules more than five thousand years ago. Lord Kṛṣṇa, being a cousin of the Pāṇḍavas, was also amongst the family members.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Then the Pāṇḍavas along with Kṛṣṇa, putting the women in front, went to the Gaṅgā to give water to the departed relatives who desired it.
Commentary

In the Eighth Chapter Kṛṣṇa protects Parīkṣit from the brahmāstra when he is in the womb, Kuntī offers prayers to Kṛṣṇa and Yudhiṣṭhira laments.

There is a rule that the women should go in front during the funeral rites.

The Pāṇḍavas, with Draupadī, went to the Ganges to offer water to their dead. Honoring the dead is a duty even of the victorious. Grief and gratitude flow together to the river.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose memory am I overdue in honoring with some quiet act?
  • How does tending the dead change how I live with the living?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.2

↗
ते निनीयोदकं सर्वे विलप्य च भृशं पुन: । आप्लुता हरिपादाब्जरज:पूतसरिज्जले ॥ २ ॥
te ninīyodakaṁ sarve
[te nineeyodakam sarve]
vilapya ca bhṛśaṁ punaḥ
[vilapya cha bhrisham punah]
āplutā hari-pādābja-
[aaplutaa hari-paadaabja-]
rajaḥ-pūta-sarij-jale
[rajah-poota-sarij-jale]
te — all of them ninīya — having offered udakam — water sarve — every one of them vilapya — having lamented ca — and bhṛśam — sufficiently punaḥ — again āplutāḥ — took bath hari-pādābja — the lotus feet of the Lord rajaḥ — dust pūta — purified sarit — of the Ganges jale — in the water.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te ninīyodakaṁ sarve
te
all of them
ninīya
having offered
udakam
water
sarve
every one of them
vilapya ca bhṛśaṁ punaḥ
vilapya
having lamented
ca
and
bhṛśam
sufficiently
punaḥ
again
āplutā hari-pādābja-
āplutāḥ
took bath
hari-pādābja
the lotus feet of the Lord
rajaḥ-pūta-sarij-jale
rajaḥ
dust
pūta
purified
sarit
of the Ganges
jale
in the water.
Having lamented over them and sufficiently offered Ganges water, they bathed in the Ganges, whose water is sanctified due to being mixed with the dust of the lotus feet of the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Offering water to the departed and lamenting intensely, everyone again took bath in the water purified by the dust from the lotus feet of the Lord.
Commentary

Ninīya means “having given.”

Lamenting and offering Ganges water, they bathed in waters sanctified by the dust of the Lord's lotus feet. Sacred water externalizes inner cleansing. Ritual gives the body a way to participate in the soul's release.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could a simple ritual help my body keep pace with my heart?
  • What 'water' (a walk, a song, silence) cleanses me regularly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.3

↗
तत्रासीनं कुरुपतिं धृतराष्ट्रं सहानुजम् । गान्धारीं पुत्रशोकार्तां पृथां कृष्णां च माधव: ॥ ३ ॥
tatrāsīnaṁ kuru-patiṁ
[tatraaseenam kuru-patim]
dhṛtarāṣṭraṁ sahānujam
[dhritaraashtram sahaanujam]
gāndhārīṁ putra-śokārtāṁ
[gaandhaareem putra-shokaartaam]
pṛthāṁ kṛṣṇāṁ ca mādhavaḥ
[prithaam krishnaam cha maadhavah]
tatra — there āsīnam — sitting kuru-patim — the King of the Kurus dhṛtarāṣṭram — Dhṛtarāṣṭra saha-anujam — with his younger brothers gāndhārīm — Gāndhārī putra — son śoka-artām — overtaken by bereavement pṛthām — Kuntī kṛṣṇām — Draupadī ca — also mādhavaḥ — Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatrāsīnaṁ kuru-patiṁ
tatra
there
āsīnam
sitting
kuru-patim
the King of the Kurus
dhṛtarāṣṭraṁ sahānujam
dhṛtarāṣṭram
Dhṛtarāṣṭra
saha-anujam
with his younger brothers
gāndhārīṁ putra-śokārtāṁ
gāndhārīm
Gāndhārī
putra
son
śoka-artām
overtaken by bereavement
pṛthāṁ kṛṣṇāṁ ca mādhavaḥ
pṛthām
Kuntī
kṛṣṇām
Draupadī
ca
also
mādhavaḥ
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa.
There sat the King of the Kurus, Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, along with his younger brothers and Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Gāndhārī, Kuntī and Draupadī, all overwhelmed with grief. Lord Kṛṣṇa was also there.

The Battle of Kurukṣetra was fought between family members, and thus all affected persons were also family members like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and brothers, Kuntī, Draupadī, Subhadrā, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Gāndhārī and her daughters-in-law, etc. All the principal dead bodies were in some way or other related with each other, and therefore the family grief was combined. Lord Kṛṣṇa was also one of them as a cousin of the Pāṇḍavas and nephew of Kuntī, as well as brother of Subhadrā, etc. The Lord, therefore, was equally sympathetic toward all of them, and therefore he began to pacify them befittingly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa along with the sages then consoled Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Gāndhaṛī, Kuntī and Draupadī, lamenting the loss of their sons, all of whom were overcome with grief by the death of their relatives, who were all seated there, by showing the relentless movement of time upon all entities.
Commentary

Kuru-patim refers to Yudhiṣṭhira. Sahānujam refers to Bhīma and his brothers. Kṛṣṇa consoled them along with the sages.

The whole family sat together overwhelmed with grief, and Kṛṣṇa was there too. The Lord doesn't avoid the room where grief is being felt. He sits with us.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I leaving the 'grief room' to avoid discomfort?
  • How does the Lord's silent presence in pain change how I should show up for others?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.4

↗
सान्‍त्वयामास मुनिभिर्हतबन्धूञ्शुचार्पितान् । भूतेषु कालस्य गतिं दर्शयन्न प्रतिक्रियाम् ॥ ४ ॥
sāntvayām āsa munibhir
[saantvayaam aasa munibhir]
hata-bandhūṣ śucārpitān
[hata-bandhoosh shuchaarpitaan]
bhūteṣu kālasya gatiṁ
[bhooteshu kaalasya gatim]
darśayan na pratikriyām
[darshayan na pratikriyaam]
sāntvayām āsa — pacified munibhiḥ — along with the munis present there hata-bandhūn — those who lost their friends and relatives śucārpitān — all shocked and affected bhūteṣu — unto the living beings kālasya — of the supreme law of the Almighty gatim — reactions darśayan — demonstrated na — no pratikriyām — remedial measures.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sāntvayām āsa munibhir
sāntvayām āsa
pacified
munibhiḥ
along with the munis present there
hata-bandhūṣ śucārpitān
hata-bandhūn
those who lost their friends and relatives
śucārpitān
all shocked and affected
bhūteṣu kālasya gatiṁ
bhūteṣu
unto the living beings
kālasya
of the supreme law of the Almighty
gatim
reactions
darśayan na pratikriyām
darśayan
demonstrated
na
no
pratikriyām
remedial measures.
Citing the stringent laws of the Almighty and their reactions upon living beings, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and the munis began to pacify those who were shocked and affected.

The stringent laws of nature, under the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, cannot be altered by any living entity. The living entities are eternally under the subjugation of the almighty Lord. The Lord makes all the laws and orders, and these laws and orders are generally called dharma or religion. No one can create any religious formula. Bona fide religion is to abide by the orders of the Lord. The Lord’s orders are clearly declared in the Bhagavad-gītā. Everyone should follow Him only or His orders, and that will make all happy, both materially and spiritually. As long as we are in the material world, our duty is to follow the orders of the Lord, and if by the grace of the Lord we are liberated from the clutches of the material world, then in our liberated stage also we can render transcendental loving service unto the Lord. In our material stage we can see neither ourselves nor the Lord for want of spiritual vision. But when we are liberated from material affection and are situated in our original spiritual form we can see both ourselves and the Lord face to face. Mukti means to be reinstated in one’s original spiritual status after giving up the material conception of life. Therefore, human life is specifically meant for qualifying ourselves for this spiritual liberty. Unfortunately, under the influence of illusory material energy, we accept this spot-life of only a few years as our permanent existence and thus become illusioned by possessing so-called country, home, land, children, wife, community, wealth, etc., which are false representations created by māyā (illusion). And under the dictation of māyā, we fight with one another to protect these false possessions. By cultivating spiritual knowledge, we can realize that we have nothing to do with all this material paraphernalia. Then at once we become free from material attachment. This clearance of the misgivings of material existence at once takes place by association with the Lord’s devotees, who are able to inject the transcendental sound into the depths of the bewildered heart and thus make one practically liberated from all lamentation and illusion. That is a summary of the pacifying measures for those affected by the reaction of stringent material laws, exhibited in the forms of birth, death, old age and disease, which are insoluble factors of material existence. The victims of war, namely the family members of the Kurus, were lamenting the problems of death, and the Lord pacified them on the basis of knowledge.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa along with the sages then consoled Yudhiṣṭhira and his brothers, Dhṛtarāṣṭra, Gāndhaṛī, Kuntī and Draupadī, lamenting the loss of their sons, all of whom were overcome with grief by the death of their relatives, who were all seated there, by showing the relentless movement of time upon all entities.
Commentary

Kuru-patim refers to Yudhiṣṭhira. Sahānujam refers to Bhīma and his brothers. Kṛṣṇa consoled them along with the sages.

Kṛṣṇa and the munis pacified the shocked by citing the stringent laws of the Almighty. Sometimes the most comforting thing is to be reminded of a larger order. Truth, not just sentiment, can console.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose grief would be helped less by 'I'm sorry' and more by a calm pointing to truth?
  • Where am I avoiding a truthful word that would actually steady someone?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.5

↗
साधयित्वाजातशत्रो: स्वं राज्यं कितवैर्हृतम् । घातयित्वासतो राज्ञ: कचस्पर्शक्षतायुष: ॥ ५ ॥
sādhayitvājāta-śatroḥ
[saadhayitvaajaata-shatroh]
svaṁ rājyaṁ kitavair hṛtam
[svam raajyam kitavair hritam]
ghātayitvāsato rājñaḥ
[ghaatayitvaasato raajnah]
kaca-sparśa-kṣatāyuṣaḥ
[kacha-sparsha-kshataayushah]
sādhayitvā — having executed ajāta-śatroḥ — of one who has no enemy svam rājyam — own kingdom kitavaiḥ — by the clever (Duryodhana and party) hṛtam — usurped ghātayitvā — having killed asataḥ — the unscrupulous rājñaḥ — of the queen’s kaca — bunch of hair sparśa — roughly handled kṣata — decreased āyuṣaḥ — by the duration of life.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sādhayitvājāta-śatroḥ
sādhayitvā
having executed
ajāta-śatroḥ
of one who has no enemy
svaṁ rājyaṁ kitavair hṛtam
svam rājyam
own kingdom
kitavaiḥ
by the clever (Duryodhana and party)
hṛtam
usurped
ghātayitvāsato rājñaḥ
ghātayitvā
having killed
asataḥ
the unscrupulous
rājñaḥ
of the queen’s
kaca-sparśa-kṣatāyuṣaḥ
kaca
bunch of hair
sparśa
roughly handled
kṣata
decreased
āyuṣaḥ
by the duration of life.
The clever Duryodhana and his party cunningly usurped the kingdom of Yudhiṣṭhira, who had no enemy. By the grace of the Lord, the recovery was executed, and the unscrupulous kings who joined with Duryodhana were killed by Him. Others also died, their duration of life having decreased for their rough handling of the hair of Queen Draupadī.

In the glorious days, or before the advent of the Age of Kali, the brāhmaṇas, the cows, the women, the children and the old men were properly given protection.

1. The protection of the brāhmaṇas maintains the institution of varṇa and āśrama, the most scientific culture for attainment of spiritual life.

2. The protection of cows maintains the most miraculous form of food, i.e., milk, for maintaining the finer tissues of the brain for understanding higher aims of life.

3. The protection of women maintains the chastity of society, by which we can get a good generation for peace, tranquillity and progress of life.

4. The protection of children gives the human form of life its best chance to prepare the way of liberty from material bondage. Such protection of children begins from the very day of begetting a child by the purificatory process of garbhādhāna-saṁskāra, the beginning of pure life.

5. The protection of the old men gives them a chance to prepare themselves for better life after death.

This complete outlook is based on factors leading to successful humanity as against the civilization of polished cats and dogs. The killing of the above-mentioned innocent creatures is totally forbidden because even by insulting them one loses one’s duration of life. In the Age of Kali they are not properly protected, and therefore the duration of life of the present generation has shortened considerably. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is stated that when the women become unchaste for want of proper protection, there are unwanted children called varṇa-saṅkara. To insult a chaste woman means to bring about disaster in the duration of life. Duḥśāsana, a brother of Duryodhana, insulted Draupadī, an ideal chaste lady, and therefore the miscreants died untimely. These are some of the stringent laws of the Lord mentioned above.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa had Yudhiṣṭhira established in his rightful kingdom stolen by cheaters, had the unrighteous kings whose lives were shortened because of grabbing Draupadī’s hair destroyed, and had Yudhiṣṭhira conduct horse sacrifices three times with best arrangements. Thus his pure fame spread in all directions like that of Indra.
Commentary

The kings’ lives were destroyed by grabbing Draupadī’s hair and other sinful acts. The horse sacrifices were actually carried out later. This is a summary of events without chronology.

Duryodhana cunningly usurped the kingdom; by the Lord's grace it was recovered, and the unscrupulous were killed. Justice may take long, and may look like ordinary politics, but the Lord's hand is at work.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I impatient with a slow-moving justice?
  • How might the Lord be working in events I read as merely political?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.6

↗
याजयित्वाश्वमेधैस्तं त्रिभिरुत्तमकल्पकै: । तद्यश: पावनं दिक्षु शतमन्योरिवातनोत् ॥ ६ ॥
yājayitvāśvamedhais taṁ
[yaajayitvaashvamedhais tam]
tribhir uttama-kalpakaiḥ
[tribhir uttama-kalpakaih]
tad-yaśaḥ pāvanaṁ dikṣu
[tad-yashah paavanam dikshu]
śata-manyor ivātanot
[shata-manyor ivaatanot]
yājayitvā — by performing aśvamedhaiḥ — yajña in which a horse is sacrificed tam — him (King Yudhiṣṭhira) tribhiḥ — three uttama — best kalpakaiḥ — supplied with proper ingredients and performed by able priests tat — that yaśaḥ — fame pāvanam — virtuous dikṣu — all directions śata-manyoḥ — Indra, who performed one hundred such sacrifices iva — like atanot — spread.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yājayitvāśvamedhais taṁ
yājayitvā
by performing
aśvamedhaiḥ
yajña in which a horse is sacrificed
tam
him (King Yudhiṣṭhira)
tribhir uttama-kalpakaiḥ
tribhiḥ
three
uttama
best
kalpakaiḥ
supplied with proper ingredients and performed by able priests
tad-yaśaḥ pāvanaṁ dikṣu
tat
that
yaśaḥ
fame
pāvanam
virtuous
dikṣu
all directions
śata-manyor ivātanot
śata-manyoḥ
Indra, who performed one hundred such sacrifices
iva
like
atanot
spread.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa caused three well-performed aśvamedha-yajñas [horse sacrifices] to be conducted by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and thus caused his virtuous fame to be glorified in all directions, like that of Indra, who had performed one hundred such sacrifices.

This is something like the preface to the performances of aśvamedha-yajña by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. The comparison of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to the King of heaven is significant. The King of heaven is thousands and thousands of times greater than Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira in opulence, yet the fame of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was not less. The reason is that Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was a pure devotee of the Lord, and by His grace only was King Yudhiṣṭhira on the level of the King of heaven, even though he performed only three yajñas whereas the King of heaven performed hundreds. That is the prerogative of the devotee of the Lord. The Lord is equal to everyone, but a devotee of the Lord is more glorified because he is always in touch with the all-great. The sun rays are equally distributed, but still there are some places which are always dark. This is not due to the sun but to the receptive power. Similarly, those who are cent-percent devotees of the Lord get the full-fledged mercy of the Lord, which is always equally distributed everywhere.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kṛṣṇa had Yudhiṣṭhira established in his rightful kingdom stolen by cheaters, had the unrighteous kings whose lives were shortened because of grabbing Draupadī’s hair destroyed, and had Yudhiṣṭhira conduct horse sacrifices three times with best arrangements. Thus his pure fame spread in all directions like that of Indra.
Commentary

The kings’ lives were destroyed by grabbing Draupadī’s hair and other sinful acts. The horse sacrifices were actually carried out later. This is a summary of events without chronology.

Kṛṣṇa caused Yudhiṣṭhira's three horse sacrifices to be conducted, glorifying his fame. The Lord arranges opportunities for His devotees' glory. Our work is sometimes to receive what He sets up.
Reflection Questions
  • What opportunity has the Lord already arranged that I haven't yet stepped into?
  • Where do I confuse striving with following the setup He provides?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.7

↗
आमन्‍त्र्य पाण्डुपुत्रांश्च शैनेयोद्धवसंयुत: । द्वैपायनादिभिर्विप्रै: पूजितै: प्रतिपूजित: ॥ ७ ॥
āmantrya pāṇḍu-putrāṁś ca
[aamantrya paandu-putraamsh cha]
śaineyoddhava-saṁyutaḥ
[shaineyoddhava-samyutah]
dvaipāyanādibhir vipraiḥ
[dvaipaayanaadibhir vipraih]
pūjitaiḥ pratipūjitaḥ
[poojitaih pratipoojitah]
āmantrya — inviting pāṇḍu-putrān — all the sons of Pāṇḍu ca — also śaineya — Sātyaki uddhava — Uddhava saṁyutaḥ — accompanied dvaipāyana-ādibhiḥ — by the ṛṣis like Vedavyāsa vipraiḥ — by the brāhmaṇas pūjitaiḥ — being worshiped pratipūjitaḥ — the Lord also reciprocated equally.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āmantrya pāṇḍu-putrāṁś ca
āmantrya
inviting
pāṇḍu-putrān
all the sons of Pāṇḍu
ca
also
śaineyoddhava-saṁyutaḥ
śaineya
Sātyaki
uddhava
Uddhava
saṁyutaḥ
accompanied
dvaipāyanādibhir vipraiḥ
dvaipāyana-ādibhiḥ
by the ṛṣis like Vedavyāsa
vipraiḥ
by the brāhmaṇas
pūjitaiḥ pratipūjitaḥ
pūjitaiḥ
being worshiped
pratipūjitaḥ
the Lord also reciprocated equally.
Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa then prepared for His departure. He invited the sons of Pāṇḍu, after having been worshiped by the brāhmaṇas, headed by Śrīla Vyāsadeva. The Lord also reciprocated greetings.

Apparently Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was a kṣatriya and was not worshipable by the brāhmaṇas. But the brāhmaṇas present there, headed by Śrīla Vyāsadeva, all knew Him to be the Personality of Godhead, and therefore they worshiped Him. The Lord reciprocated the greetings just to honor the social order that a kṣatriya is obedient to the orders of the brāhmaṇas. Although Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was always offered the respects due the Supreme Lord from all responsible quarters, the Lord never deviated from the customary usages between the four orders of society. The Lord purposely observed all these social customs so that others would follow Him in the future.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! Having spoken to the Pāṇḍavas, having worshipped the sages such as Vyāsa and have been worshipped by them, Kṛṣṇa, desiring to go to Dvārakā, while seated on his chariot with Sātyaki and Uddhava, saw Uttarā, shaking with fear, running towards him.
Commentary

Śaineyaḥ means Sātyaki, the grandson of Śini.

Kṛṣṇa prepared to depart, was worshiped by the brāhmaṇas, and reciprocated greetings. Even cosmic departures are bordered by simple courtesies. Holiness honors etiquette.
Reflection Questions
  • What small courtesies am I skipping in important transitions?
  • Where could a respectful goodbye matter more than I think?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.8

↗
गन्तुं कृतमतिर्ब्रह्मन् द्वारकां रथमास्थित: । उपलेभेऽभिधावन्तीमुत्तरां भयविह्वलाम् ॥ ८ ॥
gantuṁ kṛtamatir brahman
[gantum kritamatir brahman]
dvārakāṁ ratham āsthitaḥ
[dvaarakaam ratham aasthitah]
upalebhe ’bhidhāvantīm
[upalebhe ’bhidhaavanteem]
uttarāṁ bhaya-vihvalām
[uttaraam bhaya-vihvalaam]
gantum — just desiring to start kṛtamatiḥ — having decided brahman — O brāhmaṇa dvārakām — towards Dvārakā ratham — on the chariot āsthitaḥ — seated upalebhe — saw abhidhāvantīm — coming hurriedly uttarām — Uttarā bhaya-vihvalām — being afraid.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gantuṁ kṛtamatir brahman
gantum
just desiring to start
kṛtamatiḥ
having decided
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
dvārakāṁ ratham āsthitaḥ
dvārakām
towards Dvārakā
ratham
on the chariot
āsthitaḥ
seated
upalebhe ’bhidhāvantīm
upalebhe
saw
abhidhāvantīm
coming hurriedly
uttarāṁ bhaya-vihvalām
uttarām
Uttarā
bhaya-vihvalām
being afraid.
As soon as He seated Himself on the chariot to start for Dvārakā, He saw Uttarā hurrying toward Him in fear.

All the members of the family of the Pāṇḍavas were completely dependent on the protection of the Lord, and therefore the Lord protected all of them in all circumstances. The Lord protects everyone, but one who depends completely upon Him is especially looked after by the Lord. The father is more attentive to the little son who is exclusively dependent on the father.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! Having spoken to the Pāṇḍavas, having worshipped the sages such as Vyāsa and have been worshipped by them, Kṛṣṇa, desiring to go to Dvārakā, while seated on his chariot with Sātyaki and Uddhava, saw Uttarā, shaking with fear, running towards him.
Commentary

Śaineyaḥ means Sātyaki, the grandson of Śini.

As Kṛṣṇa mounted His chariot, Uttarā ran toward Him in fear. Real crisis collapses ceremony. We are allowed to interrupt the Lord with urgent need.
Reflection Questions
  • What fear of mine should be brought directly to the Lord — without ceremony?
  • Where am I being too composed in prayer instead of urgent?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.9

↗
उत्तरोवाच पाहि पाहि महायोगिन् देवदेव जगत्पते । नान्यं त्वदभयं पश्ये यत्र मृत्यु: परस्परम् ॥ ९ ॥
uttarovāca
[uttarovaacha]
pāhi pāhi mahā-yogin
[paahi paahi mahaa-yogin]
deva-deva jagat-pate
[deva-deva jagat-pate]
nānyaṁ tvad abhayaṁ paśye
[naanyam tvad abhayam pashye]
yatra mṛtyuḥ parasparam
[yatra mrityuh parasparam]
uttarā uvāca — Uttarā said pāhi pāhi — protect, protect mahā-yogin — the greatest mystic deva-deva — the worshipable of the worshiped jagat-pate — O Lord of the universe na — not anyam — anyone else tvat — than You abhayam — fearlessness paśye — do I see yatra — where there is mṛtyuḥ — death parasparam — in the world of duality.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
uttarovāca
uttarā uvāca
Uttarā said
pāhi pāhi mahā-yogin
pāhi pāhi
protect, protect
mahā-yogin
the greatest mystic
deva-deva jagat-pate
deva-deva
the worshipable of the worshiped
jagat-pate
O Lord of the universe
nānyaṁ tvad abhayaṁ paśye
na
not
anyam
anyone else
tvat
than You
abhayam
fearlessness
paśye
do I see
yatra mṛtyuḥ parasparam
yatra
where there is
mṛtyuḥ
death
parasparam
in the world of duality.
Uttarā said: O Lord of lords, Lord of the universe! You are the greatest of mystics. Please protect me, protect me, for there is no one else who can save me from the clutches of death in this world of duality.

This material world is the world of duality, in contrast with the oneness of the absolute realm. The world of duality is composed of matter and spirit, whereas the absolute world is complete spirit without any tinge of the material qualities. In the dual world everyone is falsely trying to become the master of the world, whereas in the absolute world the Lord is the absolute Lord, and all others are His absolute servitors. In the world of duality everyone is envious of all others, and death is inevitable due to the dual existence of matter and spirit. The Lord is the only shelter of fearlessness for the surrendered soul. One cannot save himself from the cruel hands of death in the material world without having surrendered himself at the lotus feet of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Uttarā said: O great yogī! O Supreme Lord! Master of the universe! Please protect me. I do not see anyone except you who is fearless in this word where each living being causes another’s death.
Commentary

Other than you (tvad) I see no one who can give fearlessness. Death is mutual (parasparam) in the sense that one person causes another’s death, and someone else causes his death.

Uttarā cried: protect me from death's clutches; no one else can. Real refuge is found only when we admit no one else can save us. Other rescuers are partial; Kṛṣṇa is total.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom or what am I leaning on as if they were total refuge?
  • Where would honestly admitting helplessness open the door to real help?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.10

↗
अभिद्रवति मामीश शरस्तप्तायसो विभो । कामं दहतु मां नाथ मा मे गर्भो निपात्यताम् ॥ १० ॥
abhidravati mām īśa
[abhidravati maam eesha]
śaras taptāyaso vibho
[sharas taptaayaso vibho]
kāmaṁ dahatu māṁ nātha
[kaamam dahatu maam naatha]
mā me garbho nipātyatām
[maa me garbho nipaatyataam]
abhidravati — coming towards mām — me īśa — O Lord śaraḥ — the arrow tapta — fiery ayasaḥ — iron vibho — O great one kāmam — desire dahatu — let it burn mām — me nātha — O protector mā — not me — my garbhaḥ — embryo nipātyatām — be aborted.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
abhidravati mām īśa
abhidravati
coming towards
mām
me
īśa
O Lord
śaras taptāyaso vibho
śaraḥ
the arrow
tapta
fiery
ayasaḥ
iron
vibho
O great one
kāmaṁ dahatu māṁ nātha
kāmam
desire
dahatu
let it burn
mām
me
nātha
O protector
mā me garbho nipātyatām
mā
not
me
my
garbhaḥ
embryo
nipātyatām
be aborted.
O my Lord, You are all-powerful. A fiery iron arrow is coming towards me fast. My Lord, let it burn me personally, if You so desire, but please do not let it burn and abort my embryo. Please do me this favor, my Lord.

This incident took place after the death of Abhimanyu, the husband of Uttarā. Abhimanyu’s widow, Uttarā, should have followed the path of her husband, but because she was pregnant, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit, a great devotee of the Lord, was lying in embryo, she was responsible for his protection. The mother of a child has a great responsibility in giving all protection to the child, and therefore Uttarā was not ashamed to express this frankly before Lord Kṛṣṇa. Uttarā was the daughter of a great king, the wife of a great hero, and student of a great devotee, and later she was the mother of a good king also. She was fortunate in every respect.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O powerful lord! This arrow of burning iron is pursuing me. O Lord! Let it burn me up! But let it not kill my child!
Commentary

“You are praying for your life even though you are now without your husband Abhimanyu. Are you not ashamed?” I am not praying for my life. I am praying for my son’s life.

She begged: burn me personally if You wish, but spare the embryo. The mother's instinct is to take the burn herself. Love is willingness to absorb cost to protect another.
Reflection Questions
  • For whom would I willingly take the harm if I had to?
  • Where am I asked to absorb something so another can grow?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.11

↗
सूत उवाच उपधार्य वचस्तस्या भगवान् भक्तवत्सल: । अपाण्डवमिदं कर्तुं द्रौणेरस्त्रमबुध्यत ॥ ११ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
upadhārya vacas tasyā
[upadhaarya vachas tasyaa]
bhagavān bhakta-vatsalaḥ
[bhagavaan bhakta-vatsalah]
apāṇḍavam idaṁ kartuṁ
[apaandavam idam kartum]
drauṇer astram abudhyata
[drauner astram abudhyata]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta Gosvāmī said upadhārya — by hearing her patiently vacaḥ — words tasyāḥ — her bhagavān — the Personality of Godhead bhakta-vatsalaḥ — He who is very much affectionate towards His devotees apāṇḍavam — without the existence of the Pāṇḍavas’ descendants idam — this kartum — to do it drauṇeḥ — of the son of Droṇācārya astram — weapon abudhyata — understood.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta Gosvāmī said
upadhārya vacas tasyā
upadhārya
by hearing her patiently
vacaḥ
words
tasyāḥ
her
bhagavān bhakta-vatsalaḥ
bhagavān
the Personality of Godhead
bhakta-vatsalaḥ
He who is very much affectionate towards His devotees
apāṇḍavam idaṁ kartuṁ
apāṇḍavam
without the existence of the Pāṇḍavas’ descendants
idam
this
kartum
to do it
drauṇer astram abudhyata
drauṇeḥ
of the son of Droṇācārya
astram
weapon
abudhyata
understood.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Having patiently heard her words, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is always very affectionate to His devotees, could at once understand that Aśvatthāmā, the son of Droṇācārya, had thrown the brahmāstra to finish the last life in the Pāṇḍava family.

The Lord is impartial in every respect, but still He is inclined towards His devotees because there is a great necessity of this for everyone’s well-being. The Pāṇḍava family was a family of devotees, and therefore the Lord wanted them to rule the world. That was the reason He vanquished the rule of the company of Duryodhana and established the rule of Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. Therefore, He also wanted to protect Mahārāja Parīkṣit, who was lying in embryo. He did not like the idea that the world should be without the Pāṇḍavas, the ideal family of devotees.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta said: Hearing Uttarā’s words, Kṛṣṇa, affectionate to his devotees, understood that Aśvatthāmā had released a brahmāstra to rid the world of the Pāṇḍavas.
Commentary

Aśvatthāmā wanted to make the world (idam) without the Pāṇḍavas (apāṇḍavam).

Kṛṣṇa heard her words and understood Aśvatthāmā's brahmāstra was finishing the last Pāṇḍava line. The Lord, affectionate, sees the deeper threat behind the immediate prayer. He hears what we cannot fully say.
Reflection Questions
  • What underneath my surface prayer does the Lord already see?
  • Where do I shrink my prayer because I think He won't get the whole picture?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.12

↗
तर्ह्येवाथ मुनिश्रेष्ठ पाण्डवा: पञ्च सायकान् । आत्मनोऽभिमुखान्दीप्तानालक्ष्यास्त्राण्युपाददु: ॥ १२ ॥
tarhy evātha muni-śreṣṭha
[tarhy evaatha muni-shreshtha]
pāṇḍavāḥ pañca sāyakān
[paandavaah pancha saayakaan]
ātmano ’bhimukhān dīptān
[aatmano ’bhimukhaan deeptaan]
ālakṣyāstrāṇy upādaduḥ
[aalakshyaastraany upaadaduh]
tarhi — then eva — also atha — therefore muni-śreṣṭha — O chief amongst the munis pāṇḍavāḥ — all the sons of Pāṇḍu pañca — five sāyakān — weapons ātmanaḥ — own selves abhimukhān — towards dīptān — glaring ālakṣya — seeing it astrāṇi — weapons upādaduḥ — took up.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tarhy evātha muni-śreṣṭha
tarhi
then
eva
also
atha
therefore
muni-śreṣṭha
O chief amongst the munis
pāṇḍavāḥ pañca sāyakān
pāṇḍavāḥ
all the sons of Pāṇḍu
pañca
five
sāyakān
weapons
ātmano ’bhimukhān dīptān
ātmanaḥ
own selves
abhimukhān
towards
dīptān
glaring
ālakṣyāstrāṇy upādaduḥ
ālakṣya
seeing it
astrāṇi
weapons
upādaduḥ
took up.
O foremost among the great thinkers [munis] [Śaunaka], seeing the glaring brahmāstra proceeding towards them, the Pāṇḍavas took up their five respective weapons.

The brahmāstras are finer than the nuclear weapons. Aśvatthāmā discharged the brahmāstra simply to kill the Pāṇḍavas, namely the five brothers headed by Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and their only grandson, who was lying within the womb of Uttarā. Therefore the brahmāstra, more effective and finer than the atomic weapons, was not as blind as the atomic bombs. When the atomic bombs are discharged they do not discriminate between the target and others. Mainly the atomic bombs do harm to the innocent because there is no control. The brahmāstra is not like that. It marks out the target and proceeds accordingly without harming the innocent.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O best of sages! Seeing five flaming arrows headed towards them, the Pāṇḍavas then took up their weapons.
Commentary

The Pāṇḍavas only saw this and no one else could.

Seeing the brahmāstra approaching, the Pāṇḍavas took up their five weapons. Even surrendered souls do their part. Faith doesn't replace responsibility; it accompanies it.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'weapon' (skill, action) should I be taking up even while trusting the Lord?
  • Where is my surrender masking my passivity?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.13

↗
व्यसनं वीक्ष्य तत्तेषामनन्यविषयात्मनाम् । सुदर्शनेन स्वास्त्रेण स्वानां रक्षां व्यधाद्विभु: ॥ १३ ॥
vyasanaṁ vīkṣya tat teṣām
[vyasanam veekshya tat teshaam]
ananya-viṣayātmanām
[ananya-vishayaatmanaam]
sudarśanena svāstreṇa
[sudarshanena svaastrena]
svānāṁ rakṣāṁ vyadhād vibhuḥ
[svaanaam rakshaam vyadhaad vibhuh]
vyasanam — great danger vīkṣya — having observed tat — that teṣām — their ananya — no other viṣaya — means ātmanām — thus inclined sudarśanena — by the wheel of Śrī Kṛṣṇa sva-astreṇa — by the weapon svānām — of His own devotees rakṣām — protection vyadhāt — did it vibhuḥ — the Almighty.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyasanaṁ vīkṣya tat teṣām
vyasanam
great danger
vīkṣya
having observed
tat
that
teṣām
their
ananya-viṣayātmanām
ananya
no other
viṣaya
means
ātmanām
thus inclined
sudarśanena svāstreṇa
sudarśanena
by the wheel of Śrī Kṛṣṇa
sva-astreṇa
by the weapon
svānāṁ rakṣāṁ vyadhād vibhuḥ
svānām
of His own devotees
rakṣām
protection
vyadhāt
did it
vibhuḥ
the Almighty.
The almighty Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, having observed that a great danger was befalling His unalloyed devotees, who were fully surrendered souls, at once took up His Sudarśana disc to protect them.

The brahmāstra, the supreme weapon released by Aśvatthāmā, was something similar to the nuclear weapon but with more radiation and heat. This brahmāstra is the product of a more subtle science, being the product of a finer sound, a mantra recorded in the Vedas. Another advantage of this weapon is that it is not blind like the nuclear weapon because it can be directed only to the target and nothing else. Aśvatthāmā released the weapon just to finish all the male members of Pāṇḍu’s family; therefore in one sense it was more dangerous than the atomic bombs because it could penetrate even the most protected place and would never miss the target. Knowing all this, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa at once took up His personal weapon to protect His devotees, who did not know anyone other than Kṛṣṇa. In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord has clearly promised that His devotees are never to be vanquished. And He behaves according to the quality or degree of the devotional service rendered by the devotees. Here the word ananya-viṣayātmanām is significant. The Pāṇḍavas were cent-percent dependent on the protection of the Lord, although they were all great warriors themselves. But the Lord neglects even the greatest warriors and also vanquishes them in no time. When the Lord saw that there was no time for the Pāṇḍavas to counteract the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā, He took up His weapon even at the risk of breaking His own vow. Although the Battle of Kurukṣetra was almost finished, still, according to His vow, He should not have taken up His own weapon. But the emergency was more important than the vow. He is better known as the bhakta-vatsala, or the lover of His devotee, and thus He preferred to continue as bhakta-vatsala than to be a worldly moralist who never breaks his solemn vow.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, seeing the danger to the Pāṇḍavas who were dedicated only to him, protected them with his own weapon - the Sudarśana.
Commentary

The brahmāstra cannot be counteracted by any weapon except another brahmāstra. Arjuna had counteracted one brahmāstra with one of his previously. Now Aśvatthāmā had released five separate brahmāstras for each of the Pāṇḍavas. This was difficult to counteract because it would take time to release five brahmāstras. Considering (vīkṣya) the unavoidable danger, though the Lord had renounced all weapons, he protected his devotees, even if he had to break his own promise, in order to preserve his unique quality of having affection for his devotees.

Kṛṣṇa, seeing danger to His unalloyed devotees, took up His Sudarśana disc to protect them. The Lord's protective response is proportional to our exclusive surrender. He shows up most fully where He is most needed.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my life have I been protected in ways I only recognize in hindsight?
  • What 'disc' of His mercy am I underestimating right now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.14

↗
अन्त:स्थ: सर्वभूतानामात्मा योगेश्वरोहरि: । स्वमाययावृणोद्गर्भं वैराट्या: कुरुतन्तवे ॥ १४ ॥
antaḥsthaḥ sarva-bhūtānām
[antahsthah sarva-bhootaanaam]
ātmā yogeśvaro hariḥ
[aatmaa yogeshvaro harih]
sva-māyayāvṛṇod garbhaṁ
[sva-maayayaavrinod garbham]
vairāṭyāḥ kuru-tantave
[vairaatyaah kuru-tantave]
antaḥsthaḥ — being within sarva — all bhūtānām — of the living beings ātmā — soul yoga-īśvaraḥ — the Lord of all mysticism hariḥ — the Supreme Lord sva-māyayā — by the personal energy āvṛṇot — covered garbham — embryo vairāṭyāḥ — of Uttarā kuru-tantave — for the progeny of Mahārāja Kuru.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
antaḥsthaḥ sarva-bhūtānām
antaḥsthaḥ
being within
sarva
all
bhūtānām
of the living beings
ātmā yogeśvaro hariḥ
ātmā
soul
yoga-īśvaraḥ
the Lord of all mysticism
hariḥ
the Supreme Lord
sva-māyayāvṛṇod garbhaṁ
sva-māyayā
by the personal energy
āvṛṇot
covered
garbham
embryo
vairāṭyāḥ kuru-tantave
vairāṭyāḥ
of Uttarā
kuru-tantave
for the progeny of Mahārāja Kuru.
The Lord of supreme mysticism, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, resides within everyone’s heart as the Paramātmā. As such, just to protect the progeny of the Kuru dynasty, He covered the embryo of Uttarā by His personal energy.

The Lord of supreme mysticism can simultaneously reside within everyone’s heart, or even within the atoms, by His Paramātmā feature, His plenary portion. Therefore, from within the body of Uttarā He covered the embryo to save Mahārāja Parīkṣit and protect the progeny of Mahārāja Kuru, of whom King Pāṇḍu was also a descendant. Both the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra and those of Pāṇḍu belonged to the same dynasty of Mahārāja Kuru; therefore both of them were generally known as Kurus. But when there were differences between the two families, the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra were known as Kurus whereas the sons of Pāṇḍu were known as Pāṇḍavas. Since the sons and grandsons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra were all killed in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, the last son of the dynasty is designated as the son of the Kurus.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, master of yoga, the soul dwelling within all beings, covered the embryo of Parīkṣit within Uttarā, in order to preserve the family of the Pāṇḍavas, using his yoga-māyā.
Commentary

As the paramātmā Kṛṣṇa was situated within Uttarā already (antaḥsthaḥ), but by the power of his yoga (yogeśvaraḥ) he entered as Kṛṣṇa and covered the embryo. “Covered” means he protected it, for continuation of the Kuru family (kuru-tantave). He used his yoga-māyā potency (sva-māyayā), so that even Uttarā was unaware of what he did. Kuru here means the Pāṇḍavas since they were also in the Kuru family.

Kṛṣṇa as Paramātmā within everyone's heart covered Uttarā's embryo with His personal energy. The same Lord who pervades all also acts intimately within one small womb. Cosmic and intimate are the same Person.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I treating the Lord as cosmic but not intimate, or vice versa?
  • What in me right now is being covered by His personal energy without my noticing?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.15

↗
यद्यप्यस्त्रं ब्रह्मशिरस्त्वमोघं चाप्रतिक्रियम् । वैष्णवं तेज आसाद्य समशाम्यद् भृगूद्वह ॥ १५ ॥
yadyapy astraṁ brahma-śiras
[yadyapy astram brahma-shiras]
tv amoghaṁ cāpratikriyam
[tv amogham chaapratikriyam]
vaiṣṇavaṁ teja āsādya
[vaishnavam teja aasaadya]
samaśāmyad bhṛgūdvaha
[samashaamyad bhrigoodvaha]
yadyapi — although astram — weapon brahma-śiraḥ — supreme tu — but amogham — without check ca — and apratikriyam — not to be counteracted vaiṣṇavam — in relation with Viṣṇu tejaḥ — strength āsādya — being confronted with samaśāmyat — was neutralized bhṛgu-udvaha — O glory of the family of Bhṛgu.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yadyapy astraṁ brahma-śiras
yadyapi
although
astram
weapon
brahma-śiraḥ
supreme
tu
but
tv amoghaṁ cāpratikriyam
amogham
without check
ca
and
apratikriyam
not to be counteracted
vaiṣṇavaṁ teja āsādya
vaiṣṇavam
in relation with Viṣṇu
tejaḥ
strength
āsādya
being confronted with
samaśāmyad bhṛgūdvaha
samaśāmyat
was neutralized
bhṛgu-udvaha
O glory of the family of Bhṛgu.
O Śaunaka, glory of Bhṛgu’s family, although the supreme brahmāstra weapon released by Aśvatthāmā was irresistible and without check or counteraction, it was neutralized and foiled when confronted by the strength of Viṣṇu [Lord Kṛṣṇa].

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that the brahmajyoti, or the glowing transcendental effulgence, is resting on Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. In other words, the glowing effulgence known as brahma-tejas is nothing but the rays of the Lord, just as the sun rays are rays of the sun disc. So this Brahma weapon also, although materially irresistible, could not surpass the supreme strength of the Lord. The weapon called brahmāstra, released by Aśvatthāmā, was neutralized and foiled by Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa by His own energy; that is to say, He did not wait for any other’s help because He is absolute.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Śaunaka! Though the brahmāstra is effective and cannot be prevented from acting, on meeting the weapon of Viṣṇu, it became completely ineffective.
Though the brahmāstra was supposedly irresistible, it was neutralized by Viṣṇu's strength. What is 'irresistible' to material forces is small before the Lord's will. Categories of inevitability shift around Him.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'irresistible' force in my life have I underestimated the Lord's ability to neutralize?
  • Where am I treating something as a fixed fate that may bend before grace?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.16

↗
मा मंस्था ह्येतदाश्चर्यं सर्वाश्चर्यमयेऽच्युते । य इदं मायया देव्या सृजत्यवति हन्त्यज: ॥ १६ ॥
mā maṁsthā hy etad āścaryaṁ
[maa mamsthaa hy etad aashcharyam]
sarvāścaryamaye ’cyute
[sarvaashcharyamaye ’chyute]
ya idaṁ māyayā devyā
[ya idam maayayaa devyaa]
sṛjaty avati hanty ajaḥ
[srijaty avati hanty ajah]
mā — do not maṁsthāḥ — think hi — certainly etat — all these āścaryam — wonderful sarva — all āścarya-maye — in the all-mysterious acyute — the infallible yaḥ — one who idam — this (creation) māyayā — by His energy devyā — transcendental sṛjati — creates avati — maintains hanti — annihilates ajaḥ — unborn.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mā maṁsthā hy etad āścaryaṁ
mā
do not
maṁsthāḥ
think
hi
certainly
etat
all these
āścaryam
wonderful
sarvāścaryamaye ’cyute
sarva
all
āścarya-maye
in the all-mysterious
acyute
the infallible
ya idaṁ māyayā devyā
yaḥ
one who
idam
this (creation)
māyayā
by His energy
devyā
transcendental
sṛjaty avati hanty ajaḥ
sṛjati
creates
avati
maintains
hanti
annihilates
ajaḥ
unborn.
O brāhmaṇas, do not think this to be especially wonderful in the activities of the mysterious and infallible Personality of Godhead. By His own transcendental energy He creates, maintains and annihilates all material things, although He Himself is unborn.

The activities of the Lord are always inconceivable to the tiny brain of the living entities. Nothing is impossible for the Supreme Lord, but all His actions are wonderful for us, and thus He is always beyond the range of our conceivable limits. The Lord is the all-powerful, all-perfect Personality of Godhead. The Lord is cent-percent perfect, whereas others, namely Nārāyaṇa, Brahmā, Śiva, the demigods and all other living beings, possess only different percentages of such perfection. No one is equal to or greater than Him. He is unrivaled.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You should not consider this so surprising for Kṛṣṇa who is full of all wonderful powers. He creates, maintains and destroys this universe by his power of Māyā-devī.
Don't think this especially wonderful: by His own transcendental energy He creates, maintains, and annihilates all things while remaining unaffected. Miracles are not exceptions for the Lord; they are His ordinary scale.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I expect the Lord to do less than He naturally does?
  • What 'miracle' am I praying for that is small compared to what He already accomplishes daily?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.17

↗
ब्रह्मतेजोविनिर्मुक्तैरात्मजै: सह कृष्णया । प्रयाणाभिमुखं कृष्णमिदमाह पृथा सती ॥ १७ ॥
brahma-tejo-vinirmuktair
[brahma-tejo-vinirmuktair]
ātmajaiḥ saha kṛṣṇayā
[aatmajaih saha krishnayaa]
prayāṇābhimukhaṁ kṛṣṇam
[prayaanaabhimukham krishnam]
idam āha pṛthā satī
[idam aaha prithaa satee]
brahma-tejaḥ — the radiation of the brahmāstra vinirmuktaiḥ — being saved from ātma-jaiḥ — along with her sons saha — with kṛṣṇayā — Draupadī prayāṇa — outgoing abhimukham — towards kṛṣṇam — unto Lord Kṛṣṇa idam — this āha — said pṛthā — Kuntī satī — chaste, devoted to the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
brahma-tejo-vinirmuktair
brahma-tejaḥ
the radiation of the brahmāstra
vinirmuktaiḥ
being saved from
ātmajaiḥ saha kṛṣṇayā
ātma-jaiḥ
along with her sons
saha
with
kṛṣṇayā
Draupadī
prayāṇābhimukhaṁ kṛṣṇam
prayāṇa
outgoing
abhimukham
towards
kṛṣṇam
unto Lord Kṛṣṇa
idam āha pṛthā satī
idam
this
āha
said
pṛthā
Kuntī
satī
chaste, devoted to the Lord.
Thus saved from the radiation of the brahmāstra, Kuntī, the chaste devotee of the Lord, and her five sons and Draupadī addressed Lord Kṛṣṇa as He started for home.

Kuntī is described herein as satī, or chaste, due to her unalloyed devotion to Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Her mind will now be expressed in the following prayers for Lord Kṛṣṇa. A chaste devotee of the Lord does not look to others, namely any other living being or demigod, even for deliverance from danger. That was all along the characteristic of the whole family of the Pāṇḍavas. They knew nothing except Kṛṣṇa, and therefore the Lord was also always ready to help them in all respects and in all circumstances. That is the transcendental nature of the Lord. He reciprocates the dependence of the devotee. One should not, therefore, look for help from imperfect living beings or demigods, but one should look for all help from Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is competent to save His devotees. Such a chaste devotee also never asks the Lord for help, but the Lord, out of His own accord, is always anxious to render it.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The devotee Kuntī, along with Draupadī and her sons who were saved from the fire radiation of the brahmāstra, then spoke to Kṛṣṇa as he was about to depart for Dvārakā.
Commentary

Kṛṣṇayā means “with Draupadī.” Satī means a devotee.

Saved from the radiation, Kuntī and the others addressed Kṛṣṇa as He departed. Gratitude is best expressed before the helper leaves. We should speak our thanks while the moment is fresh.
Reflection Questions
  • Who needs to hear my thanks before they 'depart' from this season of my life?
  • Where am I postponing gratitude that should be spoken now?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.18

↗
कुन्त्युवाच नमस्ये पुरुषं त्वाद्यमीश्वरं प्रकृते: परम् । अलक्ष्यं सर्वभूतानामन्तर्बहिरवस्थितम् ॥ १८ ॥
kunty uvāca
[kunty uvaacha]
namasye puruṣaṁ tvādyam
[namasye purusham tvaadyam]
īśvaraṁ prakṛteḥ param
[eeshvaram prakriteh param]
alakṣyaṁ sarva-bhūtānām
[alakshyam sarva-bhootaanaam]
antar bahir avasthitam
[antar bahir avasthitam]
kuntī uvāca — Śrīmatī Kuntī said namasye — let me bow down puruṣam — the Supreme Person tvā — You ādyam — the original īśvaram — the controller prakṛteḥ — of the material cosmos param — beyond alakṣyam — the invisible sarva — all bhūtānām — of living beings antaḥ — within bahiḥ — without avasthitam — existing.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kunty uvāca
kuntī uvāca
Śrīmatī Kuntī said
namasye puruṣaṁ tvādyam
namasye
let me bow down
puruṣam
the Supreme Person
tvā
You
ādyam
the original
īśvaraṁ prakṛteḥ param
īśvaram
the controller
prakṛteḥ
of the material cosmos
param
beyond
alakṣyaṁ sarva-bhūtānām
alakṣyam
the invisible
sarva
all
bhūtānām
of living beings
antar bahir avasthitam
antaḥ
within
bahiḥ
without
avasthitam
existing.
Śrīmatī Kuntī said: O Kṛṣṇa, I offer my obeisances unto You because You are the original personality and are unaffected by the qualities of the material world. You are existing both within and without everything, yet You are invisible to all.

Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī was quite aware that Kṛṣṇa is the original Personality of Godhead, although He was playing the part of her nephew. Such an enlightened lady could not commit a mistake by offering obeisances unto her nephew. Therefore, she addressed Him as the original puruṣa beyond the material cosmos. Although all living entities are also transcendental, they are neither original nor infallible. The living entities are apt to fall down under the clutches of material nature, but the Lord is never like that. In the Vedas, therefore, He is described as the chief among all living entities ( nityo nityānāṁ cetanaś cetanānām ). Then again He is addressed as īśvara, or the controller. The living entities or the demigods like Candra and Sūrya are also to some extent īśvara, but none of them is the supreme īśvara, or the ultimate controller. He is the parameśvara, or the Supersoul. He is both within and without. Although He was present before Śrīmatī Kuntī as her nephew, He was also within her and everyone else. In the Bhagavad-gītā (15.15) the Lord says, “I am situated in everyone’s heart, and only due to Me one remembers, forgets and is cognizant, etc. Through all the Vedas I am to be known because I am the compiler of the Vedas, and I am the teacher of the Vedānta. ” Queen Kuntī affirms that the Lord, although both within and without all living beings, is still invisible. The Lord is, so to speak, a puzzle for the common man. Queen Kuntī experienced personally that Lord Kṛṣṇa was present before her, yet He entered within the womb of Uttarā to save her embryo from the attack of Aśvatthāmā’s brahmāstra. Kuntī herself was puzzled about whether Śrī Kṛṣṇa is all-pervasive or localized. In fact, He is both, but He reserves the right of not being exposed to persons who are not surrendered souls. This checking curtain is called the māyā energy of the Supreme Lord, and it controls the limited vision of the rebellious soul. It is explained as follows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer my respects to you, the Supreme Person, the original one, the controller, beyond the control of prakṛti, unseen by material senses, and existing inside and outside of all living beings.
Commentary

Understanding everything that Kṛṣṇa had done recently, Kuntī was unable to tolerate the agitation caused by the great respect that arose in her heart. Thus she began praising Kṛṣṇa.

“But I am your nephew. Why are you offering respects?”

“But you are the Supreme Lord (puruṣam).”

“Of course I am a man (puruṣam). There is no doubt about that!”

“You are the first one (ādyam).”

“Well, all bodies come and go. All souls are original (ādya).”

“But you are supreme (īśvaraḥ).”

“Oh, in Svarga, Indra and the moon god, and on earth the kings are controllers (iśvara).”

“But you are superior to prakṛti.”

“Am I the puruṣa within, Paramātmā?”

”No, you are imperceptible (alakṣyam). The Paramātmā is subject to revelation by use of intelligence and other means.”

“Am I the imperceptible brahman?

“No, you are situated internally and externally.”

Kuntī begins: I bow to You as the original Person, unaffected by material qualities, existing within and without yet invisible. The Lord is hiddenness itself; sight comes only when He chooses to reveal.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I expecting to 'see' the Lord on my terms?
  • What kind of devotion ripens vision rather than just trying to force it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.19

↗
मायाजवनिकाच्छन्नमज्ञाधोक्षजमव्ययम् । न लक्ष्यसे मूढद‍ृशा नटो नाट्यधरो यथा ॥ १९ ॥
māyā-javanikācchannam
[maayaa-javanikaachchannam]
ajñādhokṣajam avyayam
[ajnaadhokshajam avyayam]
na lakṣyase mūḍha-dṛśā
[na lakshyase moodha-drishaa]
naṭo nāṭyadharo yathā
[nato naatyadharo yathaa]
māyā — deluding javanikā — curtain ācchannam — covered by ajñā — ignorant adhokṣajam — beyond the range of material conception (transcendental) avyayam — irreproachable na — not lakṣyase — observed mūḍha-dṛśā — by the foolish observer naṭaḥ — artist nāṭya-dharaḥ — dressed as a player yathā — as.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māyā-javanikācchannam
māyā
deluding
javanikā
curtain
ācchannam
covered by
ajñādhokṣajam avyayam
ajñā
ignorant
adhokṣajam
beyond the range of material conception (transcendental)
avyayam
irreproachable
na lakṣyase mūḍha-dṛśā
na
not
lakṣyase
observed
mūḍha-dṛśā
by the foolish observer
naṭo nāṭyadharo yathā
naṭaḥ
artist
nāṭya-dharaḥ
dressed as a player
yathā
as.
Being beyond the range of limited sense perception, You are the eternally irreproachable factor covered by the curtain of deluding energy. You are invisible to the foolish observer, exactly as an actor dressed as a player is not recognized.

In the Bhagavad-gītā Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa affirms that less intelligent persons mistake Him to be an ordinary man like us, and thus they deride Him. The same is confirmed herein by Queen Kuntī. The less intelligent persons are those who rebel against the authority of the Lord. Such persons are known as asuras. The asuras cannot recognize the Lord’s authority. When the Lord Himself appears amongst us, as Rāma, Nṛsiṁha, Varāha or in His original form as Kṛṣṇa, He performs many wonderful acts which are humanly impossible. As we shall find in the Tenth Canto of this great literature, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa exhibited His humanly impossible activities even from the days of His lying on the lap of His mother. He killed the Pūtanā witch, although she smeared her breast with poison just to kill the Lord. The Lord sucked her breast like a natural baby, and He sucked out her very life also. Similarly, He lifted the Govardhana Hill, just as a boy picks up a frog’s umbrella, and stood several days continuously just to give protection to the residents of Vṛndāvana. These are some of the superhuman activities of the Lord described in the authoritative Vedic literatures like the Purāṇas, Itihāsas (histories) and Upaniṣads. He has delivered wonderful instructions in the shape of the Bhagavad-gītā. He has shown marvelous capacities as a hero, as a householder, as a teacher and as a renouncer. He is accepted as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by such authoritative personalities as Vyāsa, Devala, Asita, Nārada, Madhva, Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, Jīva Gosvāmī, Viśvanātha Cakravartī, Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī and all other authorities of the line. He Himself has declared as much in many places of the authentic literatures. And yet there is a class of men with demoniac mentality who are always reluctant to accept the Lord as the Supreme Absolute Truth. This is partially due to their poor fund of knowledge and partially due to their stubborn obstinacy, which results from various misdeeds in the past and present. Such persons could not recognize Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa even when He was present before them. Another difficulty is that those who depend more on their imperfect senses cannot realize Him as the Supreme Lord. Such persons are like the modern scientist. They want to know everything by their experimental knowledge. But it is not possible to know the Supreme Person by imperfect experimental knowledge. He is described herein as adhokṣaja, or beyond the range of experimental knowledge. All our senses are imperfect. We claim to observe everything and anything, but we must admit that we can observe things under certain material conditions only, which are also beyond our control. The Lord is beyond the observation of sense perception. Queen Kuntī accepts this deficiency of the conditioned soul, especially of the woman class, who are less intelligent. For less intelligent men there must be such things as temples, mosques or churches so that they may begin to recognize the authority of the Lord and hear about Him from authorities in such holy places. For less intelligent men, this beginning of spiritual life is essential, and only foolish men decry the establishment of such places of worship, which are required to raise the standard of spiritual attributes for the mass of people. For less intelligent persons, bowing down before the authority of the Lord, as generally done in the temples, mosques or churches, is as beneficial as it is for the advanced devotees to meditate upon Him by active service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I do not know you, covered by the screen of māyā, beyond the knowledge of the material senses, and unaffected, just as the puppeteer behind the screen moving the puppets is not understood by the eyes of the ignorant.
Commentary

Since internally, you protected the child in the womb of Uttarā and externally you protect us by being near us, should I understand that you are all pervading? I do not know. That is expressed in this verse.

“You are covered by the curtain (javanikā) of māyā.”

“Then māyā covers me?”

“It is like the fool who thinks that the sun is covered by a cloud. I see you as covered because my vision is covered by māyā, because you are beyond sense knowledge (adhokṣajam). Sense knowledge (akṣajam jñānam) is situated below you (adhaḥ). I do not have the power to contact you, since my knowledge arises from my senses, like the knowledge of a fool. But even if despicable people like me do not know you, there is no loss for you. You remain unaffected by this (avyayam).

“But you see me directly and praise me. You know that I am beyond prakṛti. Then why do you criticize yourself as being ignorant?”

Though the dancer is endowed with rhythms and dance steps suitable to the rasa, the ignorant spectator, ignorant of the scriptures delineating performance, sees only a dancer dancing. Though he sees, he does not really see. Similarly though I see you, I really do not see you. The word tathā (similarly) should be understood from the context. Though you protect the Pāṇḍavas, your devotees, since you are the soul within all of us constantly, you personally counteracted a weapon of Aśvatthāmā meant for killing the Pāṇḍavas. Though you promised not to use weapons, you took up a weapon. Though you protect the righteous, you had Bhīṣma and other righteous persons destroyed. Though you are most affectionate to Draupadī and Subhadrā, you let their sons be killed. I do not know the truth about your pastimes.

He is beyond limited senses, hidden by deluding energy as an actor in costume. Fools don't recognize Him because the disguise is excellent. We must look past the costume of appearance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I mistaking the Lord's 'costume' (an event, a person) for something ordinary?
  • What in my recent week wore a disguise I missed?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.20

↗
तथा परमहंसानां मुनीनाममलात्मनाम् । भक्तियोगविधानार्थं कथं पश्येम हि स्त्रिय: ॥ २० ॥
tathā paramahaṁsānāṁ
[tathaa paramahamsaanaam]
munīnām amalātmanām
[muneenaam amalaatmanaam]
bhakti-yoga-vidhānārthaṁ
[bhakti-yoga-vidhaanaartham]
kathaṁ paśyema hi striyaḥ
[katham pashyema hi striyah]
tathā — besides that paramahaṁsānām — of the advanced transcendentalists munīnām — of the great philosophers or mental speculators amala-ātmanām — those whose minds are competent to discern between spirit and matter bhakti-yoga — the science of devotional service vidhāna-artham — for executing katham — how paśyema — can observe hi — certainly striyaḥ — women.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tathā paramahaṁsānāṁ
tathā
besides that
paramahaṁsānām
of the advanced transcendentalists
munīnām amalātmanām
munīnām
of the great philosophers or mental speculators
amala-ātmanām
those whose minds are competent to discern between spirit and matter
bhakti-yoga-vidhānārthaṁ
bhakti-yoga
the science of devotional service
vidhāna-artham
for executing
kathaṁ paśyema hi striyaḥ
katham
how
paśyema
can observe
hi
certainly
striyaḥ
women.
You Yourself descend to propagate the transcendental science of devotional service unto the hearts of the advanced transcendentalists and mental speculators, who are purified by being able to discriminate between matter and spirit. How then can we women know You perfectly?

Even the greatest philosophical speculators cannot have access to the region of the Lord. It is said in the Upaniṣads that the Supreme Truth, the Absolute Personality of Godhead, is beyond the range of the thinking power of the greatest philosopher. He is unknowable by great learning or by the greatest brain. He is knowable only by one who has His mercy. Others may go on thinking about Him for years together, yet He is unknowable. This very fact is corroborated by the Queen, who is playing the part of an innocent woman. Women in general are unable to speculate like philosophers, but they are blessed by the Lord because they believe at once in the superiority and almightiness of the Lord, and thus they offer obeisances without reservation. The Lord is so kind that He does not show special favor only to one who is a great philosopher. He knows the sincerity of purpose. For this reason only, women generally assemble in great number in any sort of religious function. In every country and in every sect of religion it appears that the women are more interested than the men. This simplicity of acceptance of the Lord’s authority is more effective than showy insincere religious fervor.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
How can we women hope to see you, the object of bhakti for the omniscient, liberated sages?
Commentary

I am hopeless as a woman. Can even the omniscient sages, paramahaṁsas, who worship you with attraction for your sweet pastimes, being ignorant of the truth about your pastimes, know the intricacies of your pastimes? That is expressed in this verse.

Amalātmanām refers to those who are free from the contamination of material guṇas, liberated souls in this life. How can we see you, who are the object of bhakti-yoga practice (bhakti-yoga-vidhānārtham) for the paramahaṁsas? That the paramahaṁsas worship the Lord has been explained in the verse ātmārāmas ca munayaḥ. (SB 1.7.10)

Related verses
He descends to propagate devotional service in the hearts of advanced transcendentalists. He is reachable by the purified — and the question implicit is: how can the rest of us recognize Him too?
Reflection Questions
  • What discrimination (between matter and spirit) is my practice cultivating?
  • Where could I purify perception to recognize Him more easily?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.21

↗
कृष्णाय वासुदेवाय देवकीनन्दनाय च । नन्दगोपकुमाराय गोविन्दाय नमो नम: ॥ २१ ॥
kṛṣṇāya vāsudevāya
[krishnaaya vaasudevaaya]
devakī-nandanāya ca
[devakee-nandanaaya cha]
nanda-gopa-kumārāya
[nanda-gopa-kumaaraaya]
govindāya namo namaḥ
[govindaaya namo namah]
kṛṣṇāya — the Supreme Lord vāsudevāya — unto the son of Vasudeva devakī-nandanāya — unto the son of Devakī ca — and nanda-gopa — Nanda and the cowherd men kumārāya — unto their son govindāya — unto the Personality of Godhead, who enlivens the cows and the senses namaḥ — respectful obeisances namaḥ — obeisances.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛṣṇāya vāsudevāya
kṛṣṇāya
the Supreme Lord
vāsudevāya
unto the son of Vasudeva
devakī-nandanāya ca
devakī-nandanāya
unto the son of Devakī
ca
and
nanda-gopa-kumārāya
nanda-gopa
Nanda and the cowherd men
kumārāya
unto their son
govindāya namo namaḥ
govindāya
unto the Personality of Godhead, who enlivens the cows and the senses
namaḥ
respectful obeisances
namaḥ
obeisances.
Let me therefore offer my respectful obeisances unto the Lord, who has become the son of Vasudeva, the pleasure of Devakī, the boy of Nanda and the other cowherd men of Vṛndāvana, and the enlivener of the cows and the senses.

The Lord, being thus unapproachable by any material assets, out of unbounded and causeless mercy descends to the earth as He is in order to show His special mercy upon His unalloyed devotees and to diminish the upsurges of the demoniac persons. Queen Kuntī specifically adores the incarnation or descent of Lord Kṛṣṇa above all other incarnations because in this particular incarnation He is more approachable. In the Rāma incarnation He remained a king’s son from His very childhood, but in the incarnation of Kṛṣṇa, although He was the son of a king, He at once left the shelter of His real father and mother (King Vasudeva and Queen Devakī) just after His appearance and went to the lap of Yaśodāmāyī to play the part of an ordinary cowherd boy in the blessed Vrajabhūmi, which is very sanctified because of His childhood pastimes. Therefore Lord Kṛṣṇa is more merciful than Lord Rāma. He was undoubtedly very kind to Kuntī’s brother Vasudeva and the family. Had He not become the son of Vasudeva and Devakī, Queen Kuntī could not claim Him to be her nephew and thus address Kṛṣṇa in parental affection. But Nanda and Yaśodā are more fortunate because they could relish the Lord’s childhood pastimes, which are more attractive than all other pastimes. There is no parallel to His childhood pastimes as exhibited at Vrajabhūmi, which are replicas of His eternal affairs in the original Kṛṣṇaloka, described as the cintāmaṇi-dhāma in the Brahma-saṁhitā. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa descended Himself at Vrajabhūmi with all His transcendental entourage and paraphernalia. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore confirmed that no one is as fortunate as the residents of Vrajabhūmi, and specifically the cowherd girls, who dedicated their everything for the satisfaction of the Lord. His pastimes with Nanda and Yaśodā and His pastimes with the cowherd men and especially with the cowherd boys and the cows have caused Him to be known as Govinda. Lord Kṛṣṇa as Govinda is more inclined to the brāhmaṇas and the cows, indicating thereby that human prosperity depends more on these two items, namely brahminical culture and cow protection. Lord Kṛṣṇa is never satisfied where these are lacking.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I repeatedly offer respects to Kṛṣṇa, the son of Vasudeva, who gave joy to Devakī, who was the child of Nanda and satisfier of the senses of the gopīs.
Commentary

Among all the avatāras you are the best. Though all those who have prema are fortunate, my brother Vasudeva was most fortunate, since you selected him as your father. That is the significance of the word Vāsudeva, son of Vasudeva. And your mother, endowed with even more prema is most fortunate. You made her more successful than all others by situating yourself in her womb alone. Thus Kuntī addresses Kṛṣṇa as devakī-nandana: he who gives joy to Devakī. Nanda, endowed with more prema is most fortunate. You let him alone experience the sweetness of your infant (kumāra) pastimes (nanda-gopa-kumāra). Yaśodā with abundant prema is most fortunate. This will be explained in verse 31. The pastimes of your kaiśora age have even more sweetness than the kaumāra pastimes. Thus Kuntī addresses Kṛṣṇa as Govinda. Kṛṣṇa got the name Govinda at the beginning of his kaiśora age after he was bathed by the Surabhi cow. You take possession (vinda) of all the senses (go) of all people. The enjoyers of this form of Kṛṣṇa are not mentioned because of their extraordinary nature, the esoteric nature of this love and the lack of qualification of others to taste it.

Obeisances to the Lord who became son of Vasudeva, joy of Devakī, boy of Nanda, enlivener of cows and senses in Vṛndāvana. Cosmic divinity made itself a beloved boy. Intimacy is His chosen mode.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I keeping the Lord too 'cosmic' and missing the intimacy He offers?
  • What does 'boy of Vṛndāvana' mean for how I should approach Him today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.22

↗
नम: पङ्कजनाभाय नम: पङ्कजमालिने । नम: पङ्कजनेत्राय नमस्ते पङ्कजाङ्‍घ्रये ॥ २२ ॥
namaḥ paṅkaja-nābhāya
[namah pankaja-naabhaaya]
namaḥ paṅkaja-māline
[namah pankaja-maaline]
namaḥ paṅkaja-netrāya
[namah pankaja-netraaya]
namas te paṅkajāṅghraye
[namas te pankajaanghraye]
namaḥ — all respectful obeisances paṅkaja-nābhāya — unto the Lord who has a specific depression resembling a lotus flower in the center of His abdomen namaḥ — obeisances paṅkaja-māline — one who is always decorated with a garland of lotus flowers namaḥ — obeisances paṅkaja-netrāya — one whose glance is as cooling as a lotus flower namaḥ te — respectful obeisances unto You paṅkaja-aṅghraye — unto You, the soles of whose feet are engraved with lotus flowers (and who are therefore said to possess lotus feet).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
namaḥ paṅkaja-nābhāya
namaḥ
all respectful obeisances
paṅkaja-nābhāya
unto the Lord who has a specific depression resembling a lotus flower in the center of His abdomen
namaḥ
obeisances
namaḥ paṅkaja-māline
paṅkaja-māline
one who is always decorated with a garland of lotus flowers
namaḥ paṅkaja-netrāya
namaḥ
obeisances
paṅkaja-netrāya
one whose glance is as cooling as a lotus flower
namas te paṅkajāṅghraye
namaḥ te
respectful obeisances unto You
paṅkaja-aṅghraye
unto You, the soles of whose feet are engraved with lotus flowers (and who are therefore said to possess lotus feet).
My respectful obeisances are unto You, O Lord, whose abdomen is marked with a depression like a lotus flower, who are always decorated with garlands of lotus flowers, whose glance is as cool as the lotus and whose feet are engraved with lotuses.

Here are some of the specific symbolical marks on the spiritual body of the Personality of Godhead which distinguish His body from the bodies of all others. They are all special features of the body of the Lord. The Lord may appear as one of us, but He is always distinct by His specific bodily features. Śrīmatī Kuntī claims herself unfit to see the Lord because of her being a woman. This is claimed because women, śūdras (the laborer class) and the dvija-bandhus, or the wretched descendants of the higher three classes, are unfit by intelligence to understand transcendental subject matter concerning the spiritual name, fame, attributes, forms, etc., of the Supreme Absolute Truth. Such persons, although they are unfit to enter into the spiritual affairs of the Lord, can see Him as the arcā-vigraha, who descends to the material world just to distribute favors to the fallen souls, including the above-mentioned women, śūdras and dvija-bandhus. Because such fallen souls cannot see anything beyond matter, the Lord condescends to enter into each and every one of the innumerable universes as the Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, who grows a lotus stem from the lotuslike depression in the center of His transcendental abdomen, and thus Brahmā, the first living being in the universe, is born. Therefore, the Lord is known as the Paṅkajanābhi. The Paṅkajanābhi Lord accepts the arcā-vigraha (His transcendental form) in different elements, namely a form within the mind, a form made of wood, a form made of earth, a form made of metal, a form made of jewel, a form made of paint, a form drawn on sand, etc. All such forms of the Lord are always decorated with garlands of lotus flowers, and there should be a soothing atmosphere in the temple of worship to attract the burning attention of the nondevotees always engaged in material wranglings. The meditators worship a form within the mind. Therefore, the Lord is merciful even to the women, śūdras and dvija-bandhus, provided they agree to visit the temple of worship in different forms made for them. Such temple visitors are not idolaters, as alleged by some men with a poor fund of knowledge. All the great ācāryas established such temples of worship in all places just to favor the less intelligent, and one should not pose himself as transcending the stage of temple worship while one is actually in the category of the śūdras and the women or less. One should begin to see the Lord from His lotus feet, gradually rising to the thighs, waist, chest and face. One should not try to look at the face of the Lord without being accustomed to seeing the lotus feet of the Lord. Śrīmatī Kuntī, because of her being the aunt of the Lord, did not begin to see the Lord from the lotus feet because the Lord might feel ashamed, and thus Kuntīdevī, just to save a painful situation for the Lord, began to see the Lord just above His lotus feet, i.e., from the waist of the Lord, gradually rising to the face, and then down to the lotus feet. In the round, everything there is in order.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer respects to you, with lotus navel, wearing a lotus garland, having lotus eyes, and lotus feet.
Commentary

I am also counted among the fortunate, for you give happiness to my eyes. My eyes, receiving the sight of your navel, garland, eyes and feet, become pleasantly cool.

Obeisances to the Lord whose lotus-marked feet, lotus-shaped abdomen, lotus garland and lotus glance crush devotees' miseries. Beauty itself is medicine. Contemplation of His form heals.
Reflection Questions
  • What image of the Lord, dwelt upon, actually lifts my mind?
  • Where could beauty replace argument as my path back to Him?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.23

↗
यथा हृषीकेश खलेन देवकी कंसेन रुद्धातिचिरं शुचार्पिता । विमोचिताहं च सहात्मजा विभो त्वयैव नाथेन मुहुर्विपद्गणात् ॥ २३ ॥
yathā hṛṣīkeśa khalena devakī
[yathaa hrisheekesha khalena devakee]
kaṁsena ruddhāticiraṁ śucārpitā
[kamsena ruddhaatichiram shuchaarpitaa]
vimocitāhaṁ ca sahātmajā vibho
[vimochitaaham cha sahaatmajaa vibho]
tvayaiva nāthena muhur vipad-gaṇāt
[tvayaiva naathena muhur vipad-ganaat]
yathā — as it were hṛṣīkeśa — the master of the senses khalena — by the envious devakī — Devakī (the mother of Śrī Kṛṣṇa) kaṁsena — by King Kaṁsa ruddhā — imprisoned ati-ciram — for a long time śuca-arpitā — distressed vimocitā — released aham ca — also myself saha-ātma-jā — along with my children vibho — O great one tvayā eva — by Your Lordship nāthena — as the protector muhuḥ — constantly vipat-gaṇāt — from a series of dangers.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā hṛṣīkeśa khalena devakī
yathā
as it were
hṛṣīkeśa
the master of the senses
khalena
by the envious
devakī
Devakī (the mother of Śrī Kṛṣṇa)
kaṁsena ruddhāticiraṁ śucārpitā
kaṁsena
by King Kaṁsa
ruddhā
imprisoned
ati-ciram
for a long time
śuca-arpitā
distressed
vimocitāhaṁ ca sahātmajā vibho
vimocitā
released
aham ca
also myself
saha-ātma-jā
along with my children
vibho
O great one
tvayaiva nāthena muhur vipad-gaṇāt
tvayā eva
by Your Lordship
nāthena
as the protector
muhuḥ
constantly
vipat-gaṇāt
from a series of dangers.
O Hṛṣīkeśa, master of the senses and Lord of lords, You have released Your mother, Devakī, who was long imprisoned and distressed by the envious King Kaṁsa, and me and my children from a series of constant dangers.

Devakī, the mother of Kṛṣṇa and sister of King Kaṁsa, was put into prison along with her husband, Vasudeva, because the envious King was afraid of being killed by Devakī’s eighth son (Kṛṣṇa). He killed all the sons of Devakī who were born before Kṛṣṇa, but Kṛṣṇa escaped the danger of child-slaughter because He was transferred to the house of Nanda Mahārāja, Lord Kṛṣṇa’s foster father. Kuntīdevī, along with her children, was also saved from a series of dangers. But Kuntīdevī was shown far more favor because Lord Kṛṣṇa did not save the other children of Devakī, whereas He saved the children of Kuntīdevī. This was done because Devakī’s husband, Vasudeva, was living, whereas Kuntīdevī was a widow, and there was none to help her except Kṛṣṇa. The conclusion is that Kṛṣṇa endows more favor to a devotee who is in greater dangers. Sometimes He puts His pure devotees in such dangers because in that condition of helplessness the devotee becomes more attached to the Lord. The more the attachment is there for the Lord, the more success is there for the devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O master of the senses! O Lord! Just as you protected Devakī imprisoned by evil Kaṁsa one time, you, my master, released me along with my sons repeatedly from even greater dangers, since I was afflicted with great suffering.
Commentary

You protected me when I was helpless as if I were your mother.

O Hṛṣīkeśa, master of the senses! You alone know my heart since you are master of the senses. I was rescued from danger along with my sons. You showed special mercy to me (since you did not protect her (Devakī’s) other children). What was the reason? I was more afflicted with suffering by my karmas (śucārpitā). I was suffering even more than Devakī. I was saved by you, my master (nāthena). She had a husband (nātha), Vasudeva and thus had the possibility of having more children. And since you were the crest jewel among all children, what need was there for her previous inferior children who were not saved? Moreover, I was again and again saved from a host of dangers, whereas she was saved from one little danger caused by Kaṁsa. She had not even a trace of danger since she was happy with repeated expectations that the Supreme Lord would be born from her womb. And after you were born, she had no danger at all. I was in all ways wretched. You were merciful to me because you are the friend of the most fallen. I was not like fortunate Devakī who had prema for you.

Hṛṣīkeśa freed Devakī from long imprisonment, and Kuntī and her children from constant dangers. The Lord's track record with our family is the basis for confidence in His present care.
Reflection Questions
  • What past rescues should I recount to steady my present fear?
  • Where am I forgetting His prior interventions in my life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.24

↗
विषान्महाग्ने: पुरुषाददर्शना- दसत्सभाया वनवासकृच्छ्रत: । मृधे मृधेऽनेकमहारथास्त्रतो द्रौण्यस्त्रतश्चास्म हरेऽभिरक्षिता: ॥ २४ ॥
viṣān mahāgneḥ puruṣāda-darśanād
[vishaan mahaagneh purushaada-darshanaad]
asat-sabhāyā vana-vāsa-kṛcchrataḥ
[asat-sabhaayaa vana-vaasa-krichchratah]
mṛdhe mṛdhe ’neka-mahārathāstrato
[mridhe mridhe ’neka-mahaarathaastrato]
drauṇy-astrataś cāsma hare ’bhirakṣitāḥ
[drauny-astratash chaasma hare ’bhirakshitaah]
viṣāt — from poison mahā-agneḥ — from the great fire puruṣa-ada — the man-eaters darśanāt — by combating asat — vicious sabhāyāḥ — assembly vana-vāsa — exiled to the forest kṛcchrataḥ — sufferings mṛdhe mṛdhe — again and again in battle aneka — many mahā-ratha — great generals astrataḥ — weapons drauṇi — the son of Droṇācārya astrataḥ — from the weapon of ca — and āsma — indicating past tense hare — O my Lord abhirakṣitāḥ — protected completely.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viṣān mahāgneḥ puruṣāda-darśanād
viṣāt
from poison
mahā-agneḥ
from the great fire
puruṣa-ada
the man-eaters
darśanāt
by combating
asat-sabhāyā vana-vāsa-kṛcchrataḥ
asat
vicious
sabhāyāḥ
assembly
vana-vāsa
exiled to the forest
kṛcchrataḥ
sufferings
mṛdhe mṛdhe ’neka-mahārathāstrato
mṛdhe mṛdhe
again and again in battle
aneka
many
mahā-ratha
great generals
astrataḥ
weapons
drauṇy-astrataś cāsma hare ’bhirakṣitāḥ
drauṇi
the son of Droṇācārya
astrataḥ
from the weapon of
ca
and
āsma
indicating past tense
hare
O my Lord
abhirakṣitāḥ
protected completely.
My dear Kṛṣṇa, Your Lordship has protected us from a poisoned cake, from a great fire, from cannibals, from the vicious assembly, from sufferings during our exile in the forest and from the battle where great generals fought. And now You have saved us from the weapon of Aśvatthāmā.

The list of dangerous encounters is submitted herein. Devakī was once put into difficulty by her envious brother, otherwise she was well. But Kuntīdevī and her sons were put into one difficulty after another for years and years together. They were put into trouble by Duryodhana and his party due to the kingdom, and each and every time the sons of Kuntī were saved by the Lord. Once Bhīma was administered poison in a cake, once they were put into the house made of shellac and set afire, and once Draupadī was dragged out, and attempts were made to insult her by stripping her naked in the vicious assembly of the Kurus. The Lord saved Draupadī by supplying an immeasurable length of cloth, and Duryodhana’s party failed to see her naked. Similarly, when they were exiled in the forest, Bhīma had to fight with the man-eater demon Hiḍimba Rākṣasa, but the Lord saved him. So it was not finished there. After all these tribulations, there was the great Battle of Kurukṣetra, and Arjuna had to meet such great generals as Droṇa, Bhīṣma and Karṇa, all powerful fighters. And at last, even when everything was done away with, there was the brahmāstra released by the son of Droṇācārya to kill the child within the womb of Uttarā, and so the Lord saved the only surviving descendant of the Kurus, Mahārāja Parīkṣit.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You saved us from Bhīma getting poisoned, from the burning house of lac, from the sight of rākṣasas like Hiḍimbā, from the gambling den, from the hardships of living in the forest, from unlimited weapons thrown by great warriors in countless battlefields, and from the brahmāstra of Aśvatthāmā.
Commentary

In this verse she shows the variety of dangers. Viṣād refers to the giving of poison to Bhīma. Mahāgneḥ means from the burning of the house of lac. Puruṣāda means the rākṣasas like Hiḍimbā. Asat-sabhāyāḥ refers to the gambling match.

Kuntī recounts protection from poisoned cake, fire, cannibals, vicious assembly, exile sufferings, and battlefield generals — and now from the brahmāstra. The list of God's saves grows long for those who keep count.
Reflection Questions
  • Could I write my own list of saves? Would I be surprised by its length?
  • Where do I focus on the unsaved and forget the saved?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.25

↗
विपद: सन्तु ता: शश्वत्तत्र तत्र जगद्गुरो । भवतो दर्शनं यत्स्यादपुनर्भवदर्शनम् ॥ २५ ॥
vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat
[vipadah santu taah shashvat]
tatra tatra jagad-guro
[tatra tatra jagad-guro]
bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād
[bhavato darshanam yat syaad]
apunar bhava-darśanam
[apunar bhava-darshanam]
vipadaḥ — calamities santu — let there be tāḥ — all śaśvat — again and again tatra — there tatra — and there jagat-guro — O Lord of the universe bhavataḥ — Your darśanam — meeting yat — that which syāt — is apunaḥ — not again bhava-darśanam — seeing repetition of birth and death.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vipadaḥ santu tāḥ śaśvat
vipadaḥ
calamities
santu
let there be
tāḥ
all
śaśvat
again and again
tatra tatra jagad-guro
tatra
there
tatra
and there
jagat-guro
O Lord of the universe
bhavato darśanaṁ yat syād
bhavataḥ
Your
darśanam
meeting
yat
that which
syāt
is
apunar bhava-darśanam
apunaḥ
not again
bhava-darśanam
seeing repetition of birth and death.
I wish that all those calamities would happen again and again so that we could see You again and again, for seeing You means that we will no longer see repeated births and deaths.

Generally the distressed, the needy, the intelligent and the inquisitive, who have performed some pious activities, worship or begin to worship the Lord. Others, who are thriving on misdeeds only, regardless of status, cannot approach the Supreme due to being misled by the illusory energy. Therefore, for a pious person, if there is some calamity there is no other alternative than to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord. Constantly remembering the lotus feet of the Lord means preparing for liberation from birth and death. Therefore, even though there are so-called calamities, they are welcome because they give us an opportunity to remember the Lord, which means liberation.

One who has taken shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord, which are accepted as the most suitable boat for crossing the ocean of nescience, can achieve liberation as easily as one leaps over the holes made by the hoofs of a calf. Such persons are meant to reside in the abode of the Lord, and they have nothing to do with a place where there is danger in every step.

This material world is certified by the Lord in the Bhagavad-gītā as a dangerous place full of calamities. Less intelligent persons prepare plans to adjust to those calamities without knowing that the nature of this place is itself full of calamities. They have no information of the abode of the Lord, which is full of bliss and without trace of calamity. The duty of the sane person, therefore, is to be undisturbed by worldly calamities, which are sure to happen in all circumstances. Suffering all sorts of unavoidable misfortunes, one should make progress in spiritual realization because that is the mission of human life. The spirit soul is transcendental to all material calamities; therefore, the so-called calamities are called false. A man may see a tiger swallowing him in a dream, and he may cry for this calamity. Actually there is no tiger and there is no suffering; it is simply a case of dreams. In the same way, all calamities of life are said to be dreams. If someone is lucky enough to get in contact with the Lord by devotional service, it is all gain. Contact with the Lord by any one of the nine devotional services is always a forward step on the path going back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O guru of the universe! May we have dangers in such situations continually, because in those dangers we will see you, and by that we will gain release from this material world.
Commentary

These dangers are a great blessing to me. O guru of the universe! To give benefit to us, you destroy unsteadiness caused by intoxication with material comfort by giving the ointment of dangers arising out of your mercy. Through those dangers (yad) we can see you. By seeing you, we no longer will see the suffering of material existence.

I wish those calamities would happen again so we could see You again — for seeing You ends birth and death. Trouble that drives us toward the Lord is more valuable than ease that lets us forget Him.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I ever silently wished for the difficulty that made me pray?
  • Where would I refuse a return to comfort if it meant losing the closeness it cost me?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.26

↗
जन्मैश्वर्यश्रुतश्रीभिरेधमानमद: पुमान् । नैवार्हत्यभिधातुं वै त्वामकिञ्चनगोचरम् ॥ २६ ॥
janmaiśvarya-śruta-śrībhir
[janmaishvarya-shruta-shreebhir]
edhamāna-madaḥ pumān
[edhamaana-madah pumaan]
naivārhaty abhidhātuṁ vai
[naivaarhaty abhidhaatum vai]
tvām akiñcana-gocaram
[tvaam akinchana-gocharam]
janma — birth aiśvarya — opulence śruta — education śrībhiḥ — by the possession of beauty edhamāna — progressively increasing madaḥ — intoxication pumān — the human being na — never eva — ever arhati — deserves abhidhātum — to address in feeling vai — certainly tvām — You akiñcana-gocaram — one who is approached easily by the materially exhausted man.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
janmaiśvarya-śruta-śrībhir
janma
birth
aiśvarya
opulence
śruta
education
śrībhiḥ
by the possession of beauty
edhamāna-madaḥ pumān
edhamāna
progressively increasing
madaḥ
intoxication
pumān
the human being
naivārhaty abhidhātuṁ vai
na
never
eva
ever
arhati
deserves
abhidhātum
to address in feeling
vai
certainly
tvām akiñcana-gocaram
tvām
You
akiñcana-gocaram
one who is approached easily by the materially exhausted man.
My Lord, Your Lordship can easily be approached, but only by those who are materially exhausted. One who is on the path of [material] progress, trying to improve himself with respectable parentage, great opulence, high education and bodily beauty, cannot approach You with sincere feeling.

Being materially advanced means taking birth in an aristocratic family and possessing great wealth, an education and attractive personal beauty. All materialistic men are mad after possessing all these material opulences, and this is known as the advancement of material civilization. But the result is that by possessing all these material assets one becomes artificially puffed up, intoxicated by such temporary possessions. Consequently, such materially puffed up persons are incapable of uttering the holy name of the Lord by addressing Him feelingly, “O Govinda, O Kṛṣṇa.” It is said in the śāstras that by once uttering the holy name of the Lord, the sinner gets rid of a quantity of sins that he is unable to commit. Such is the power of uttering the holy name of the Lord. There is not the least exaggeration in this statement. Actually the Lord’s holy name has such powerful potency. But there is a quality to such utterances also. It depends on the quality of feeling. A helpless man can feelingly utter the holy name of the Lord, whereas a man who utters the same holy name in great material satisfaction cannot be so sincere. A materially puffed up person may utter the holy name of the Lord occasionally, but he is incapable of uttering the name in quality. Therefore, the four principles of material advancement, namely (1) high parentage, (2) good wealth, (3) high education and (4) attractive beauty, are, so to speak, disqualifications for progress on the path of spiritual advancement. The material covering of the pure spirit soul is an external feature, as much as fever is an external feature of the unhealthy body. The general process is to decrease the degree of the fever and not to aggravate it by maltreatment. Sometimes it is seen that spiritually advanced persons become materially impoverished. This is no discouragement. On the other hand, such impoverishment is a good sign as much as the falling of temperature is a good sign. The principle of life should be to decrease the degree of material intoxication which leads one to be more and more illusioned about the aim of life. Grossly illusioned persons are quite unfit for entrance into the kingdom of God.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A man swelling with pride because of birth, power, learning or money, cannot chant your names. You are available to those who have nothing except you.
Commentary

The security of the material world is actually a danger. Abhidhātum means “to say the names of the Lord.”

You are easily approached only by the materially exhausted, not by those puffed with parentage, opulence, education and beauty. Spiritual receptivity often requires the collapse of worldly props.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my worldly 'props' is currently keeping me from full approach?
  • Where would exhaustion be a doorway rather than a defeat?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.27

↗
नमोऽकिञ्चनवित्ताय निवृत्तगुणवृत्तये । आत्मारामाय शान्ताय कैवल्यपतये नम: ॥ २७ ॥
namo ’kiñcana-vittāya
[namo ’kinchana-vittaaya]
nivṛtta-guṇa-vṛttaye
[nivritta-guna-vrittaye]
ātmārāmāya śāntāya
[aatmaaraamaaya shaantaaya]
kaivalya-pataye namaḥ
[kaivalya-pataye namah]
namaḥ — all obeisances unto You akiñcana-vittāya — unto the property of the materially impoverished nivṛtta — completely transcendental to the actions of the material modes guṇa — material modes vṛttaye — affection ātma-ārāmāya — one who is self-satisfied śāntāya — the most gentle kaivalya-pataye — unto the master of the monists namaḥ — bowing down.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
namo ’kiñcana-vittāya
namaḥ
all obeisances unto You
akiñcana-vittāya
unto the property of the materially impoverished
nivṛtta-guṇa-vṛttaye
nivṛtta
completely transcendental to the actions of the material modes
guṇa
material modes
vṛttaye
affection
ātmārāmāya śāntāya
ātma-ārāmāya
one who is self-satisfied
śāntāya
the most gentle
kaivalya-pataye namaḥ
kaivalya-pataye
unto the master of the monists
namaḥ
bowing down.
My obeisances are unto You, who are the property of the materially impoverished. You have nothing to do with the actions and reactions of the material modes of nature. You are self-satisfied, and therefore You are the most gentle and are master of the monists.

A living being is finished as soon as there is nothing to possess. Therefore a living being cannot be, in the real sense of the term, a renouncer. A living being renounces something for gaining something more valuable. A student sacrifices his childish proclivities to gain better education. A servant gives up his job for a better job. Similarly, a devotee renounces the material world not for nothing but for something tangible in spiritual value. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, Sanātana Gosvāmī and Śrīla Raghunātha dāsa Gosvāmī and others gave up their worldly pomp and prosperity for the sake of the service of the Lord. They were big men in the worldly sense. The Gosvāmīs were ministers in the government service of Bengal, and Śrīla Raghunātha dāsa Gosvāmī was the son of a big zamindar of his time. But they left everything to gain something superior to what they previously possessed. The devotees are generally without material prosperity, but they have a very secret treasure-house in the lotus feet of the Lord. There is a nice story about Śrīla Sanātana Gosvāmī. He had a touchstone, and this stone was left in a pile of refuse. A needy man took it, but later on wondered why the valuable stone was kept in such a neglected place. He therefore asked Sanātana for the most valuable thing, and then he was given the holy name of the Lord. Akiñcana means one who has nothing to give materially. A factual devotee, or mahātmā, does not give anything material to anyone because he has already left all material assets. He can, however, deliver the supreme asset, namely the Personality of Godhead, because He is the only property of a factual devotee. The touchstone of Sanātana Gosvāmī, which was thrown in the rubbish, was not the property of the Gosvāmī, otherwise it would not have been kept in such a place. This specific example is given for the neophyte devotees just to convince them that material hankerings and spiritual advancement go ill together. Unless one is able to see everything as spiritual in relation with the Supreme Lord, one must always distinguish between spirit and matter. A spiritual master like Śrīla Sanātana Gosvāmī, although personally able to see everything as spiritual, set this example for us only because we have no such spiritual vision.

Advancement of material vision or material civilization is a great stumbling block for spiritual advancement. Such material advancement entangles the living being in the bondage of a material body followed by all sorts of material miseries. Such material advancement is called anartha, or things not wanted. Actually this is so. In the present context of material advancement one uses lipstick at a cost of fifty cents, and there are so many unwanted things which are all products of the material conception of life. By diverting attention to so many unwanted things, human energy is spoiled without achievement of spiritual realization, the prime necessity of human life. The attempt to reach the moon is another example of spoiling energy because even if the moon is reached, the problems of life will not be solved. The devotees of the Lord are called akiñcanas because they have practically no material assets. Such material assets are all products of the three modes of material nature. They foil spiritual energy, and thus the less we possess such products of material nature, the more we have a good chance for spiritual progress.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead has no direct connection with material activities. All His acts and deeds, which are exhibited even in this material world, are spiritual and without affection for the modes of material nature. In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says that all His acts, even His appearance and disappearance in and out of the material world, are transcendental, and one who knows this perfectly shall not take his birth again in this material world, but will go back to Godhead.

The material disease is due to hankering after and lording it over material nature. This hankering is due to an interaction of the three modes of nature, and neither the Lord nor the devotees have attachment for such false enjoyment. Therefore, the Lord and the devotees are called nivṛtta-guṇa-vṛtti. The perfect nivṛtta-guṇa-vṛtti is the Supreme Lord because He never becomes attracted by the modes of material nature, whereas the living beings have such a tendency. Some of them are entrapped by the illusory attraction of material nature.

Because the Lord is the property of the devotees, and the devotees are the property of the Lord reciprocally, the devotees are certainly transcendental to the modes of material nature. That is a natural conclusion. Such unalloyed devotees are distinct from the mixed devotees who approach the Lord for mitigation of miseries and poverty or because of inquisitiveness and speculation. The unalloyed devotees and the Lord are transcendentally attached to one another. For others, the Lord has nothing to reciprocate, and therefore He is called ātmārāma, self-satisfied. Self-satisfied as He is, He is the master of all monists who seek to merge into the existence of the Lord. Such monists merge within the personal effulgence of the Lord called the brahmajyoti, but the devotees enter into the transcendental pastimes of the Lord, which are never to be misunderstood as material.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I offer my respects to he whose treasure is unalloyed devotees, who is devoid of material interest, who is disinterested in those who are not devotees, who forgives his devotees, and helps the devotee desiring liberation.
Commentary

Those who do not have anything materially speaking (akiñcana), but possess only you who have a body of complete knowledge and bliss, are alone your unalloyed devotees. They are the abodes of prema, and are thus like treasures, who should be hidden from everyone. I offer respects to you who possess these treasures of the akiñcanas (akiñcana-vittāya). But akiñcanas are poor. That is true. The devotees of the Lord do not have the wealth arising from the guṇas of māyā (nivṛtta). They have the Lord who is devoid of all material enjoyment (nivṛtta-guṇa-vṛttaye). The Lord’s attachment to the akiñcana-bhaktas was described. Now, his detachment from others is shown (ātmārāmāya). If the devotee makes offense to the Lord, the Lord does not become angry. He remains peaceful (śāntāya), showing mercy to his devotee. He also assists those devotees interested in liberation (kaivalya-pataye).

You are the property of the materially impoverished. The poor inherit Him; the rich rarely make the time. Aspirational privilege is a spiritual hazard.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'poverty' (of time, status, self-image) might be a hidden spiritual asset?
  • Where am I pursuing an upward path that is actually distancing me from the Lord?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.28

↗
मन्ये त्वां कालमीशानमनादिनिधनं विभुम् । समं चरन्तं सर्वत्र भूतानां यन्मिथ: कलि: ॥ २८ ॥
manye tvāṁ kālam īśānam
[manye tvaam kaalam eeshaanam]
anādi-nidhanaṁ vibhum
[anaadi-nidhanam vibhum]
samaṁ carantaṁ sarvatra
[samam charantam sarvatra]
bhūtānāṁ yan mithaḥ kaliḥ
[bhootaanaam yan mithah kalih]
manye — I consider tvām — Your Lordship kālam — the eternal time īśānam — the Supreme Lord anādi-nidhanam — without beginning and end vibhum — all-pervading samam — equally merciful carantam — distributing sarvatra — everywhere bhūtānām — of the living beings yat mithaḥ — by intercourse kaliḥ — dissension.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
manye tvāṁ kālam īśānam
manye
I consider
tvām
Your Lordship
kālam
the eternal time
īśānam
the Supreme Lord
anādi-nidhanaṁ vibhum
anādi-nidhanam
without beginning and end
vibhum
all-pervading
samaṁ carantaṁ sarvatra
samam
equally merciful
carantam
distributing
sarvatra
everywhere
bhūtānāṁ yan mithaḥ kaliḥ
bhūtānām
of the living beings
yat mithaḥ
by intercourse
kaliḥ
dissension.
My Lord, I consider Your Lordship to be eternal time, the supreme controller, without beginning and end, the all-pervasive one. In distributing Your mercy, You are equal to everyone. The dissensions between living beings are due to social intercourse.

Kuntīdevī knew that Kṛṣṇa was neither her nephew nor an ordinary family member of her paternal house. She knew perfectly well that Kṛṣṇa is the primeval Lord who lives in everyone’s heart as the Supersoul, Paramātmā. Another name of the Paramātmā feature of the Lord is kāla, or eternal time. Eternal time is the witness of all our actions, good and bad, and thus resultant reactions are destined by Him. It is no use saying that we do not know why and for what we are suffering. We may forget the misdeed for which we may suffer at this present moment, but we must remember that Paramātmā is our constant companion, and therefore He knows everything, past, present and future. And because the Paramātmā feature of Lord Kṛṣṇa destines all actions and reactions, He is the supreme controller also. Without His sanction not a blade of grass can move. The living beings are given as much freedom as they deserve, and misuse of that freedom is the cause of suffering. The devotees of the Lord do not misuse their freedom, and therefore they are the good sons of the Lord. Others, who misuse freedom, are put into miseries destined by the eternal kāla. The kāla offers the conditioned souls both happiness and miseries. It is all predestined by eternal time. As we have miseries uncalled-for, so we may have happiness also without being asked, for they are all predestined by kāla. No one is therefore either an enemy or friend of the Lord. Everyone is suffering and enjoying the result of his own destiny. This destiny is made by the living beings in course of social intercourse. Everyone here wants to lord it over the material nature, and thus everyone creates his own destiny under the supervision of the Supreme Lord. He is all-pervading and therefore He can see everyone’s activities. And because the Lord has no beginning or end, He is known also as the eternal time, kāla.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I consider you to be destroyer of the offenders, the controller, without beginning or end, the most powerful, equal to all, moving everywhere in all living beings, and the abode of conflicting qualities.
Commentary

This verse describes the Lord’s destruction (kālam) of those who offend his devotees. You are not unjust (samam) because you show attachment to the devotee, indifference to matter, assistance to some and destruction to others. Yad mithaḥ kaliḥ means “in whom there is conflict because the Lord gives suffering and bliss, he is equal and prejudiced, is unmerciful and merciful.”

You are eternal time, the supreme controller without beginning or end, equal to all. Inequalities are social inventions; from the Lord's vantage, all souls are equal.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom do I treat as 'less' that the Lord treats as equal?
  • Where could I borrow His view to dismantle my own ranking?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.29

↗
न वेद कश्चिद्भगवंश्चिकीर्षितं तवेहमानस्य नृणां विडम्बनम् । न यस्य कश्चिद्दयितोऽस्ति कर्हिचिद् द्वेष्यश्च यस्मिन् विषमा मतिर्नृणाम् ॥ २९ ॥
na veda kaścid bhagavaṁś cikīrṣitaṁ
[na veda kashchid bhagavamsh chikeershitam]
tavehamānasya nṛṇāṁ viḍambanam
[tavehamaanasya nrinaam vidambanam]
na yasya kaścid dayito ’sti karhicid
[na yasya kashchid dayito ’sti karhichid]
dveṣyaś ca yasmin viṣamā matir nṛṇām
[dveshyash cha yasmin vishamaa matir nrinaam]
na — does not veda — know kaścit — anyone bhagavan — O Lord cikīrṣitam — pastimes tava — Your īhamānasya — like the worldly men nṛṇām — of the people in general viḍambanam — misleading na — never yasya — His kaścit — anyone dayitaḥ — object of specific favor asti — there is karhicit — anywhere dveṣyaḥ — object of envy ca — and yasmin — unto Him viṣamā — partiality matiḥ — conception nṛṇām — of the people.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na veda kaścid bhagavaṁś cikīrṣitaṁ
na
does not
veda
know
kaścit
anyone
bhagavan
O Lord
cikīrṣitam
pastimes
tavehamānasya nṛṇāṁ viḍambanam
tava
Your
īhamānasya
like the worldly men
nṛṇām
of the people in general
viḍambanam
misleading
na yasya kaścid dayito ’sti karhicid
na
never
yasya
His
kaścit
anyone
dayitaḥ
object of specific favor
dveṣyaś ca yasmin viṣamā matir nṛṇām
asti
there is
karhicit
anywhere
dveṣyaḥ
object of envy
ca
and
yasmin
unto Him
viṣamā
partiality
matiḥ
conception
nṛṇām
of the people.
O Lord, no one can understand Your transcendental pastimes, which appear to be human and so are misleading. You have no specific object of favor, nor do You have any object of envy. People only imagine that You are partial.

The Lord’s mercy upon the fallen souls is equally distributed. He has no one as the specific object of hostility. The very conception of the Personality of Godhead as a human being is misleading. His pastimes appear to be exactly like a human being’s, but actually they are transcendental and without any tinge of material contamination. He is undoubtedly known as partial to His pure devotees, but in fact He is never partial, as much as the sun is never partial to anyone. By utilizing the sun rays, sometimes even the stones become valuable, whereas a blind man cannot see the sun, although there are enough sun rays before him. Darkness and light are two opposite conceptions, but this does not mean that the sun is partial in distributing its rays. The sun rays are open to everyone, but the capacities of the receptacles differ. Foolish people think that devotional service is flattering the Lord to get special mercy. Factually the pure devotees who are engaged in the transcendental loving service of the Lord are not a mercantile community. A mercantile house renders service to someone in exchange for values. The pure devotee does not render service unto the Lord for such exchange, and therefore the full mercy of the Lord is open for him. Suffering men, needy men, inquisitive persons, or philosophers make temporary connections with the Lord to serve a particular purpose. When the purpose is served, there is no more relation with the Lord. A suffering man, if he is pious at all, prays to the Lord for his recovery. But as soon as the recovery is over, in most cases the suffering man no longer cares to keep any connection with the Lord. The mercy of the Lord is open for him, but he is reluctant to receive it. That is the difference between a pure devotee and a mixed devotee. Those who are completely against the service of the Lord are considered to be in abject darkness, those who ask for the Lord’s favor only at the time of necessity are partial recipients of the mercy of the Lord, and those who are cent-percent engaged in the service of the Lord are full recipients of the mercy of the Lord. Such partiality in receiving the Lord’s mercy is relative to the recipient, and it is not due to the partiality of the all-merciful Lord.

When the Lord descends to this material world by His all-merciful energy, He plays like a human being, and therefore it appears that the Lord is partial to His devotees only, but that is not a fact. Despite such apparent manifestation of partiality, His mercy is equally distributed. In the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra all persons who died in the fight before the presence of the Lord got salvation without the necessary qualifications because death before the presence of the Lord purifies the passing soul from the effects of all sins, and therefore the dying man gets a place somewhere in the transcendental abode. Somehow or other if someone puts himself open in the sun rays, he is sure to get the requisite benefit both by heat and by ultraviolet rays. Therefore, the conclusion is that the Lord is never partial. It is wrong for the people in general to think of Him as partial.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
No one knows the intentions of the Lord who desires to hide himself in human form, who does not show favor or hatred to anyone, and about whom all men have different opinions.
Commentary

“Who will decide the truth about you if there is a disagreement?” No one can decide. This is explained in two verses.

No one knows the plan of you who desire (īhamānasya) to make the knowledge of those who speculate about scripture useless. Or no one knows the plan of you who desire to play the role of human beings as Rāma and Kṛṣṇa. Or no one knows the plan of you who desire to delude the fools by not letting them see your sweet qualities. All men have differing ideas about you (yasmin viṣamā matir nṛṇām). The sun shows attachment to the sun stone by imparting its own qualities. It shows indifference to the blind people and is helpful to the Cakravāka birds (who become joyful when the sun rises and destroys darkness). The sun is harmful to the darkness used by thieves and owls. But the sun is not partial to anyone. It manifests the same light to all. The cause of difference is the good or bad qualities of the specific object. It is the same with the Lord. Different people relate with the Lord in different ways according to their qualities.

No one understands Your pastimes, which appear human and so mislead. People imagine You are partial when You are not. The Lord's apparent partiality is our projection.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I reading the Lord as partial when the partiality is mine?
  • What 'human' aspect of God-stories misleads me into smallness?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.30

↗
जन्म कर्म च विश्वात्मन्नजस्याकर्तुरात्मन: । तिर्यङ्‍नृषिषु याद:सु तदत्यन्तविडम्बनम् ॥ ३० ॥
janma karma ca viśvātmann
[janma karma cha vishvaatmann]
ajasyākartur ātmanaḥ
[ajasyaakartur aatmanah]
tiryaṅ-nṝṣiṣu yādaḥsu
[tiryan-nreeshishu yaadahsu]
tad atyanta-viḍambanam
[tad atyanta-vidambanam]
janma — birth karma — activity ca — and viśva-ātman — O soul of the universe ajasya — of the unborn akartuḥ — of the inactive ātmanaḥ — of the vital energy tiryak — animal nṛ — human being ṛṣiṣu — in the sages yādaḥsu — in the water tat — that atyanta — veritable viḍambanam — bewildering.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
janma karma ca viśvātmann
janma
birth
karma
activity
ca
and
viśva-ātman
O soul of the universe
ajasyākartur ātmanaḥ
ajasya
of the unborn
akartuḥ
of the inactive
ātmanaḥ
of the vital energy
tiryaṅ-nṝṣiṣu yādaḥsu
tiryak
animal
nṛ
human being
ṛṣiṣu
in the sages
yādaḥsu
in the water
tad atyanta-viḍambanam
tat
that
atyanta
veritable
viḍambanam
bewildering.
Of course it is bewildering, O soul of the universe, that You work, though You are inactive, and that You take birth, though You are the vital force and the unborn. You Yourself descend amongst animals, men, sages and aquatics. Verily, this is bewildering.

The transcendental pastimes of the Lord are not only bewildering but also apparently contradictory. In other words, they are all inconceivable to the limited thinking power of the human being. The Lord is the all-prevailing Supersoul of all existence, and yet He appears in the form of a boar amongst the animals, in the form of a human being as Rāma, Kṛṣṇa, etc., in the form of a ṛṣi like Nārāyaṇa, and in the form of an aquatic like a fish. Yet it is said that He is unborn, and He has nothing to do. In the śruti mantra it is said that the Supreme Brahman has nothing to do. No one is equal to or greater than Him. He has manifold energies, and everything is performed by Him perfectly by automatic knowledge, strength and activity. All these statements prove without any question that the Lord’s activities, forms and deeds are all inconceivable to our limited thinking power, and because He is inconceivably powerful, everything is possible in Him. Therefore no one can calculate Him exactly; every action of the Lord is bewildering to the common man. He cannot be understood by the Vedic knowledge, but He can be easily understood by the pure devotees because they are intimately related with Him. The devotees therefore know that although He appears amongst the animals, He is not an animal, nor a man, nor a ṛṣi, nor a fish. He is eternally the Supreme Lord, in all circumstances.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O soul of the universe! You are unborn and perform no actions, but you take birth and perform activities in the forms of animals, men and aquatics. This is extremely deceptive.
Commentary

Understanding the conclusions about your partiality or impartiality, your action or lack of action, your birth or lack of birth, one can relish your pastimes. You are born though you are unborn, and perform actions though you are not the doer. You manifest your attractive nature in various forms of animals, humans and aquatics. This is an extreme deception (atyanta-viḍambanam) since it appears that you lessen your stature by accepting inferior forms. When you accepted the boar incarnation you sniffed out the earth. Though you are omniscient and omnipotent, you became a real boar. But seeing that form, the knowers of the truth will not laugh and say that you are simply a mortal animal, thinking that you are a jīva under the control of karma. Since you are actually without birth and material action, your pastimes with birth and action must not actually be true. But this is incompatible with the fact that the pastimes were attractive to ātmārāmas like Śukadeva. However, from the statement of the Lord himself janma karma ca me divyam evaṁ yo vetti tattvataḥ: he who knows the truth nature of my birth and activities (BG 4.9), the Lord’s birth and activities are factual, not a fiction. This is incompatible with the statement that the Lord has no birth and no activities. Thus who can know the truth about the Lord possessing unlimited, inconceivable powers?

Related verses
It is bewildering that You work though inactive, that You take birth though unborn. You descend among animals, men, sages, aquatics. Logical categories break against the Lord's actuality.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I demand consistency from the Lord that He never promised?
  • What would shift if I stopped requiring God to fit my categories?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.31

↗
गोप्याददे त्वयि कृतागसि दाम तावद् या ते दशाश्रुकलिलाञ्जनसम्भ्रमाक्षम् । वक्त्रं निनीय भयभावनया स्थितस्य सा मां विमोहयति भीरपि यद्ब‍िभेति ॥ ३१ ॥
gopy ādade tvayi kṛtāgasi dāma tāvad
[gopy aadade tvayi kritaagasi daama taavad]
yā te daśāśru-kalilāñjana-sambhramākṣam
[yaa te dashaashru-kalilaanjana-sambhramaaksham]
vaktraṁ ninīya bhaya-bhāvanayā sthitasya
[vaktram nineeya bhaya-bhaavanayaa sthitasya]
sā māṁ vimohayati bhīr api yad bibheti
[saa maam vimohayati bheer api yad bibheti]
gopī — the cowherd lady (Yaśodā) ādade — took up tvayi — on Your kṛtāgasi — creating disturbances (by breaking the butter pot) dāma — rope tāvat — at that time yā — that which te — Your daśā — situation aśru-kalila — overflooded with tears añjana — ointment sambhrama — perturbed akṣam — eyes vaktram — face ninīya — downwards bhaya-bhāvanayā — by thoughts of fear sthitasya — of the situation sā — that mām — me vimohayati — bewilders bhīḥ api — even fear personified yat — whom bibheti — is afraid.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
gopy ādade tvayi kṛtāgasi dāma tāvad
gopī
the cowherd lady (Yaśodā)
ādade
took up
tvayi
on Your
kṛtāgasi
creating disturbances (by breaking the butter pot)
dāma
rope
tāvat
at that time
yā te daśāśru-kalilāñjana-sambhramākṣam
yā
that which
te
Your
daśā
situation
aśru-kalila
overflooded with tears
añjana
ointment
sambhrama
perturbed
akṣam
eyes
vaktraṁ ninīya bhaya-bhāvanayā sthitasya
vaktram
face
ninīya
downwards
bhaya-bhāvanayā
by thoughts of fear
sthitasya
of the situation
sā māṁ vimohayati bhīr api yad bibheti
sā
that
mām
me
vimohayati
bewilders
bhīḥ api
even fear personified
yat
whom
bibheti
is afraid.
My dear Kṛṣṇa, Yaśodā took up a rope to bind You when You committed an offense, and Your perturbed eyes overflooded with tears, which washed the mascara from Your eyes. And You were afraid, though fear personified is afraid of You. This sight is bewildering to me.

Here is another explanation of the bewilderment created by the pastimes of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord is the Supreme in all circumstances, as already explained. Here is a specific example of the Lord’s being the Supreme and at the same time a plaything in the presence of His pure devotee. The Lord’s pure devotee renders service unto the Lord out of unalloyed love only, and while discharging such devotional service the pure devotee forgets the position of the Supreme Lord. The Supreme Lord also accepts the loving service of His devotees more relishably when the service is rendered spontaneously out of pure affection, without anything of reverential admiration. Generally the Lord is worshiped by the devotees in a reverential attitude, but the Lord is meticulously pleased when the devotee, out of pure affection and love, considers the Lord to be less important than himself. The Lord’s pastimes in the original abode of Goloka Vṛndāvana are exchanged in that spirit. The friends of Kṛṣṇa consider Him one of them. They do not consider Him to be of reverential importance. The parents of the Lord (who are all pure devotees) consider Him a child only. The Lord accepts the chastisements of the parents more cheerfully than the prayers of the Vedic hymns. Similarly, He accepts the reproaches of His fiancees more palatably than the Vedic hymns. When Lord Kṛṣṇa was present in this material world to manifest His eternal pastimes of the transcendental realm of Goloka Vṛndāvana as an attraction for the people in general, He displayed a unique picture of subordination before His foster mother, Yaśodā. The Lord, in His naturally childish playful activities, used to spoil the stocked butter of mother Yaśodā by breaking the pots and distributing the contents to His friends and playmates, including the celebrated monkeys of Vṛndāvana, who took advantage of the Lord’s munificence. Mother Yaśodā saw this, and out of her pure love she wanted to make a show of punishment for her transcendental child. She took a rope and threatened the Lord that she would tie Him up, as is generally done in the ordinary household. Seeing the rope in the hands of mother Yaśodā, the Lord bowed down His head and began to weep just like a child, and tears rolled down His cheeks, washing off the black ointment smeared about His beautiful eyes. This picture of the Lord is adored by Kuntīdevī because she is conscious of the Lord’s supreme position. He is feared often by fear personified, yet He is afraid of His mother, who wanted to punish Him just in an ordinary manner. Kuntī was conscious of the exalted position of Kṛṣṇa, whereas Yaśodā was not. Therefore Yaśodā’s position was more exalted than Kuntī’s. Mother Yaśodā got the Lord as her child, and the Lord made her forget altogether that her child was the Lord Himself. If mother Yaśodā had been conscious of the exalted position of the Lord, she would certainly have hesitated to punish the Lord. But she was made to forget this situation because the Lord wanted to make a complete gesture of childishness before the affectionate Yaśodā. This exchange of love between the mother and the son was performed in a natural way, and Kuntī, remembering the scene, was bewildered, and she could do nothing but praise the transcendental maternal love. Indirectly mother Yaśodā is praised for her unique position of love, for she could control even the all-powerful Lord as her beloved child.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My dear Kṛṣṇa, Yaśodā took up a rope to bind you when you committed an offense, and your perturbed eyes flooded with tears, which washed the mascara from your eyes. And you were afraid, though fear personified is afraid of you. This sight is bewildering to me.
Commentary

Because of this I relish your pastimes. When you broke the yogurt pot, committing offense against Yaśodā (kṛtāgasi), Yaśodā put a rope around your waist. The state at that moment astonishes me. Lowering your head with eyes filled with tears mixed with eye ointment, you stood there in fear of her punishment. It is astonishing because (yad) fear itself is afraid of you. This state shows that Yaśodā, having such prema, was more fortunate than Nanda, since you were brought under her control completely. By saying “fear is afraid of you” Kuntī shows her awareness of Kṛṣṇa’s power as the Lord. She also accepts as true that he was internally feeling fear. It would not be possible for her to be bewildered if she thought he was only imitating being fearful. Thus the word viḍambanam in the previous verse cannot mean imitation, that the Lord only took the various roles while pretending.

Yaśodā bound You with a rope, and Your eyes flooded with tears — You feared though fear personified fears You. Real love is more powerful than divine power; the Lord lets Himself be bound by it.
Reflection Questions
  • What act of pure love around me reveals more than any display of power?
  • Where could I be 'bound by love' more freely?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.32

↗
केचिदाहुरजं जातं पुण्यश्लोकस्य कीर्तये । यदो: प्रियस्यान्ववाये मलयस्येव चन्दनम् ॥ ३२ ॥
kecid āhur ajaṁ jātaṁ
[kechid aahur ajam jaatam]
puṇya-ślokasya kīrtaye
[punya-shlokasya keertaye]
yadoḥ priyasyānvavāye
[yadoh priyasyaanvavaaye]
malayasyeva candanam
[malayasyeva chandanam]
kecit — someone āhuḥ — says ajam — the unborn jātam — being born puṇya-ślokasya — of the great pious king kīrtaye — for glorifying yadoḥ — of King Yadu priyasya — of the dear anvavāye — in the family of malayasya — Malaya hills iva — as candanam — sandalwood.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kecid āhur ajaṁ jātaṁ
kecit
someone
āhuḥ
says
ajam
the unborn
jātam
being born
puṇya-ślokasya kīrtaye
puṇya-ślokasya
of the great pious king
kīrtaye
for glorifying
yadoḥ priyasyānvavāye
yadoḥ
of King Yadu
priyasya
of the dear
anvavāye
in the family of
malayasyeva candanam
malayasya
Malaya hills
iva
as
candanam
sandalwood.
Some say that the Unborn is born for the glorification of pious kings, and others say that He is born to please King Yadu, one of Your dearest devotees. You appear in his family as sandalwood appears in the Malaya hills.

Because the Lord’s appearance in this material world is bewildering, there are different opinions about the birth of the Unborn. In the Bhagavad-gītā the Lord says that He takes His birth in the material world, although He is the Lord of all creations and He is unborn. So there cannot be any denial of the birth of the Unborn because He Himself establishes the truth. But still there are different opinions as to why He takes His birth. That is also declared in the Bhagavad-gītā. He appears by His own internal potency to reestablish the principles of religion and to protect the pious and to annihilate the impious. That is the mission of the appearance of the Unborn. Still, it is said that the Lord is there to glorify the pious King Yudhiṣṭhira. Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa certainly wanted to establish the kingdom of the Pāṇḍavas for the good of all in the world. When there is a pious king ruling over the world, the people are happy. When the ruler is impious, the people are unhappy. In the Age of Kali in most cases the rulers are impious, and therefore the citizens are also continuously unhappy. But in the case of democracy, the impious citizens themselves elect their representative to rule over them, and therefore they cannot blame anyone for their unhappiness. Mahārāja Nala was also celebrated as a great pious king, but he had no connection with Lord Kṛṣṇa. Therefore Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira is meant here to be glorified by Lord Kṛṣṇa. The Lord had already glorified King Yadu, having taken birth in his family. Although He is known as Yādava, Yaduvīra, Yadunandana, etc., He is always independent of such obligation. He is just like the sandalwood that grows in the Malaya hills. Trees can grow anywhere and everywhere, yet because the sandalwood trees grow mostly in the area of the Malaya hills, the name sandalwood and the Malaya hills are interrelated. Therefore, the conclusion is that the Lord is ever unborn like the sun, and yet He appears as the sun rises on the eastern horizon. As the sun is never the sun of the eastern horizon, so the Lord is no one’s son, but He is the father of everything that be.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some say that you, though unborn, have taken birth in the Yadu family to give fame to Yudhiṣṭhira, just as sandalwood, originating in the Malaya Hills gives fame to those hills.
Commentary

If you were not to appear in this world how would we be able to relish your enchanting pastimes? There are many opinions about the cause of your appearance. Puṇya-śloka here refers to Yudhiṣṭhira, since he was famous by that name at that time. puṇya-śloko nalo rājā puṇya-śloko yudhiṣṭhiraḥ: puṇya-ṣloka means King Nala, a famous person or Yudhiṣṭhira. You appeared in the Yadu dynasty to glorify dear Yudhiṣṭhira. Or the sentence can mean “You appeared in that dynasty to glorify the famous Yadu.”

Some say You are born for the glory of pious kings, others to please the Yadu dynasty. You appear in Yadu's family as sandalwood in Malaya hills. The Lord's reasons for appearing are many and overlapping.
Reflection Questions
  • What multiple purposes might the Lord be serving through one event in my life?
  • Where do I insist on single explanations?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.33

↗
अपरे वसुदेवस्य देवक्यां याचितोऽभ्यगात् । अजस्त्वमस्य क्षेमाय वधाय च सुरद्विषाम् ॥ ३३ ॥
apare vasudevasya
[apare vasudevasya]
devakyāṁ yācito ’bhyagāt
[devakyaam yaachito ’bhyagaat]
ajas tvam asya kṣemāya
[ajas tvam asya kshemaaya]
vadhāya ca sura-dviṣām
[vadhaaya cha sura-dvishaam]
apare — others vasudevasya — of Vasudeva devakyām — of Devakī yācitaḥ — being prayed for abhyagāt — took birth ajaḥ — unborn tvam — You are asya — of him kṣemāya — for the good vadhāya — for the purpose of killing ca — and sura-dviṣām — of those who are envious of the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apare vasudevasya
apare
others
vasudevasya
of Vasudeva
devakyāṁ yācito ’bhyagāt
devakyām
of Devakī
yācitaḥ
being prayed for
abhyagāt
took birth
ajas tvam asya kṣemāya
ajaḥ
unborn
tvam
You are
asya
of him
kṣemāya
for the good
vadhāya ca sura-dviṣām
vadhāya
for the purpose of killing
ca
and
sura-dviṣām
of those who are envious of the demigods.
Others say that since both Vasudeva and Devakī prayed for You, You have taken Your birth as their son. Undoubtedly You are unborn, yet You take Your birth for their welfare and to kill those who are envious of the demigods.

It is also said that Vasudeva and Devakī, in their previous birth as Sutapā and Pṛśni, underwent a severe type of penance to get the Lord as their son, and as a result of such austerities the Lord appeared as their son. It is already declared in the Bhagavad-gītā that the Lord appears for the welfare of all people of the world and to vanquish the asuras, or the materialistic atheists.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some say that you, though unborn, appeared as the son of Vasudeva in Devakī upon their request, in order to protect the world and kill the demons.
Commentary

You are unborn yet you came as the son of Vasudeva. Using third person (abhyagāt) instead of second person verb ending with tvam is poetic license. Previously in the form of Sutapa and Pṛśni they asked the Lord to be their son. You appeared for protecting the world (asya) and killing the demons.

Others say You took birth because Vasudeva and Devakī prayed. The Lord, unborn, is born for His devotees' welfare and to remove the envious. Prayer brings God to earth.
Reflection Questions
  • What prayer of mine has the Lord 'descended' into already?
  • Where am I underestimating how my prayer might shape outcomes?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.34

↗
भारावतारणायान्ये भुवो नाव इवोदधौ । सीदन्त्या भूरिभारेण जातो ह्यात्मभुवार्थित: ॥ ३४ ॥
bhārāvatāraṇāyānye
[bhaaraavataaranaayaanye]
bhuvo nāva ivodadhau
[bhuvo naava ivodadhau]
sīdantyā bhūri-bhāreṇa
[seedantyaa bhoori-bhaarena]
jāto hy ātma-bhuvārthitaḥ
[jaato hy aatma-bhuvaarthitah]
bhāra-avatāraṇāya — just to reduce the burden to the world anye — others bhuvaḥ — of the world nāvaḥ — boat iva — like udadhau — on the sea sīdantyāḥ — aggrieved bhūri — extremely bhāreṇa — by the burden jātaḥ — You were born hi — certainly ātma-bhuvā — by Brahmā arthitaḥ — being prayed for.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhārāvatāraṇāyānye
bhāra-avatāraṇāya
just to reduce the burden to the world
anye
others
bhuvo nāva ivodadhau
bhuvaḥ
of the world
nāvaḥ
boat
iva
like
udadhau
on the sea
sīdantyā bhūri-bhāreṇa
sīdantyāḥ
aggrieved
bhūri
extremely
bhāreṇa
by the burden
jāto hy ātma-bhuvārthitaḥ
jātaḥ
You were born
hi
certainly
ātma-bhuvā
by Brahmā
arthitaḥ
being prayed for.
Others say that the world, being overburdened like a boat at sea, is much aggrieved, and that Brahmā, who is Your son, prayed for You, and so You have appeared to diminish the trouble.

Brahmā, or the first living being born just after the creation, is the direct son of Nārāyaṇa. Nārāyaṇa, as Garbhodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, first of all entered the material universe. Without spiritual contact, matter cannot create. This principle was followed from the very beginning of the creation. The Supreme Spirit entered the universe, and the first living being, Brahmā, was born on a lotus flower grown out of the transcendental abdomen of Viṣṇu. Viṣṇu is therefore known as Padmanābha. Brahmā is known as ātma-bhū because he was begotten directly from the father without any contact of mother Lakṣmījī. Lakṣmījī was present near Nārāyaṇa, engaged in the service of the Lord, and still, without contact with Lakṣmījī, Nārāyaṇa begot Brahmā. That is the omnipotency of the Lord. One who foolishly considers Nārāyaṇa like other living beings should take a lesson from this. Nārāyaṇa is not an ordinary living being. He is the Personality of Godhead Himself, and He has all the potencies of all the senses in all parts of His transcendental body. An ordinary living being begets a child by sexual intercourse, and he has no other means to beget a child other than the one designed for him. But Nārāyaṇa, being omnipotent, is not bound to any condition of energy. He is complete and independent to do anything and everything by His various potencies, very easily and perfectly. Brahmā is therefore directly the son of the father and was not put into the womb of a mother. Therefore he is known as ātma-bhū. This Brahmā is in charge of further creations in the universe, secondarily reflected by the potency of the Omnipotent. Within the halo of the universe there is a transcendental planet known as Śvetadvīpa, which is the abode of the Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, the Paramātmā feature of the Supreme Lord. Whenever there is trouble in the universe that cannot be solved by the administrative demigods, they approach Brahmājī for a solution, and if it is not to be solved even by Brahmājī, then Brahmājī consults and prays to the Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu for an incarnation and solution to the problems. Such a problem arose when Kaṁsa and others were ruling over the earth and the earth became too much overburdened by the misdeeds of the asuras. Brahmājī, along with other demigods, prayed at the shore of the Kṣīrodaka Ocean, and they were advised of the descent of Kṛṣṇa as the son of Vasudeva and Devakī. So some people say that the Lord appeared because of the prayers of Brahmājī.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Others say that you appeared at the request of Brahmā for lifting up the earth which had sunk like a boat overloaded with weight.
Commentary

Another opinion is that you appeared mainly because of Brahmā’s request.

Others say the earth, overburdened, distressed; Brahmā prayed; You appeared to diminish trouble. The whole cosmos prays, and the Lord responds. Our small prayers are part of a larger chorus.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'overburdened earth' am I helping with my prayer right now?
  • Where do I pray alone when I could pray with creation?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.35

↗
भवेऽस्मिन् क्लिश्यमानानामविद्याकामकर्मभि: । श्रवणस्मरणार्हाणि करिष्यन्निति केचन ॥ ३५ ॥
bhave ’smin kliśyamānānām
[bhave ’smin klishyamaanaanaam]
avidyā-kāma-karmabhiḥ
[avidyaa-kaama-karmabhih]
śravaṇa-smaraṇārhāṇi
[shravana-smaranaarhaani]
kariṣyann iti kecana
[karishyann iti kechana]
bhave — in the material creation asmin — this kliśyamānānām — of those who are suffering from avidyā — nescience kāma — desire karmabhiḥ — by execution of fruitive work śravaṇa — hearing smaraṇa — remembering arhāṇi — worshiping kariṣyan — may perform iti — thus kecana — others.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhave ’smin kliśyamānānām
bhave
in the material creation
avidyā-kāma-karmabhiḥ
śravaṇa-smaraṇārhāṇi
asmin
this
kliśyamānānām
of those who are suffering from
avidyā
nescience
kariṣyann iti kecana
kāma
desire
karmabhiḥ
by execution of fruitive work
śravaṇa
hearing
smaraṇa
remembering
arhāṇi
worshiping
kariṣyan
may perform
iti
thus
kecana
others.
And yet others say that You appeared for the sake of rejuvenating the devotional service of hearing, remembering, worshiping and so on in order that the conditioned souls suffering from material pangs might take advantage and gain liberation.

In the Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā the Lord asserts that He appears in every millennium just to reestablish the way of religion. The way of religion is made by the Supreme Lord. No one can manufacture a new path of religion, as is the fashion for certain ambitious persons. The factual way of religion is to accept the Lord as the supreme authority and thus render service unto Him in spontaneous love. A living being cannot help but render service because he is constitutionally made for that purpose. The only function of the living being is to render service to the Lord. The Lord is great, and living beings are subordinate to Him. Therefore, the duty of the living being is just to serve Him only. Unfortunately the illusioned living beings, out of misunderstanding only, become servants of the senses by material desire. This desire is called avidyā, or nescience. And out of such desire the living being makes different plans for material enjoyment centered about a perverted sex life. He therefore becomes entangled in the chain of birth and death by transmigrating into different bodies on different planets under the direction of the Supreme Lord. Unless, therefore, one is beyond the boundary of this nescience, one cannot get free from the threefold miseries of material life. That is the law of nature.

The Lord, however, out of His causeless mercy, because He is more merciful to the suffering living beings than they can expect, appears before them and renovates the principles of devotional service comprised of hearing, chanting, remembering, serving, worshiping, praying, cooperating and surrendering unto Him. Adoption of all the above-mentioned items, or any one of them, can help a conditioned soul get out of the tangle of nescience and thus become liberated from all material sufferings created by the living being illusioned by the external energy. This particular type of mercy is bestowed upon the living being by the Lord in the form of Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some say that you have appeared in this world to help those suffering due to their actions arising from material desires arising from ignorance by engaging them in hearing and remembering about you, so that they can attain prema.
Commentary

This is the real reason for the Lord’s appearance. First there is ignorance (avidyā) and then desire (kāma), and then action (karmabhiḥ). You come to engage those suffering due to actions arising from material desires which are due to ignorance in actions for attaining prema. The destruction of suffering is incidental, because it is said in the next verse that the result of hearing about the Lord is seeing the lotus of the Lord. By seeing the Lord one attains prema.

Still others say You appeared to rejuvenate devotional service of hearing, remembering, worshiping — so conditioned souls can take advantage. The Lord makes Himself accessible through ear and memory.
Reflection Questions
  • What is the easiest practice I am refusing because I want a harder one?
  • Where could hearing alone become the doorway I keep waiting to find?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.36

↗
श‍ृण्वन्ति गायन्ति गृणन्त्यभीक्ष्णश: स्मरन्ति नन्दन्ति तवेहितं जना: । त एव पश्यन्त्यचिरेण तावकं भवप्रवाहोपरमं पदाम्बुजम् ॥ ३६ ॥
śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanty abhīkṣṇaśaḥ
[shrinvanti gaayanti grinanty abheekshnashah]
smaranti nandanti tavehitaṁ janāḥ
[smaranti nandanti tavehitam janaah]
ta eva paśyanty acireṇa tāvakaṁ
[ta eva pashyanty achirena taavakam]
bhava-pravāhoparamaṁ padāmbujam
[bhava-pravaahoparamam padaambujam]
śṛṇvanti — hear gāyanti — chant gṛṇanti — take abhīkṣṇaśaḥ — continuously smaranti — remember nandanti — take pleasure tava — Your īhitam — activities janāḥ — people in general te — they eva — certainly paśyanti — can see acireṇa — very soon tāvakam — Your bhava-pravāha — the current of rebirth uparamam — cessation pada-ambujam — lotus feet.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanty abhīkṣṇaśaḥ
śṛṇvanti
hear
gāyanti
chant
gṛṇanti
take
abhīkṣṇaśaḥ
continuously
smaranti nandanti tavehitaṁ janāḥ
smaranti
remember
nandanti
take pleasure
tava
Your
īhitam
activities
janāḥ
people in general
te
they
ta eva paśyanty acireṇa tāvakaṁ
eva
certainly
paśyanti
can see
acireṇa
very soon
tāvakam
Your
bhava-pravāhoparamaṁ padāmbujam
bhava-pravāha
the current of rebirth
uparamam
cessation
pada-ambujam
lotus feet.
O Kṛṣṇa, those who continuously hear, chant and repeat Your transcendental activities, or take pleasure in others’ doing so, certainly see Your lotus feet, which alone can stop the repetition of birth and death.

The Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa cannot be seen by our present conditional vision. In order to see Him, one has to change his present vision by developing a different condition of life full of spontaneous love of Godhead. When Śrī Kṛṣṇa was personally present on the face of the globe, not everyone could see Him as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Materialists like Rāvaṇa, Hiraṇyakaśipu, Kaṁsa, Jarāsandha and Śiśupāla were highly qualified personalities by acquisition of material assets, but they were unable to appreciate the presence of the Lord. Therefore, even though the Lord may be present before our eyes, it is not possible to see Him unless we have the necessary vision. This necessary qualification is developed by the process of devotional service only, beginning with hearing about the Lord from the right sources. The Bhagavad-gītā is one of the popular literatures which are generally heard, chanted, repeated, etc., by the people in general, but in spite of such hearing, etc., sometimes it is experienced that the performer of such devotional service does not see the Lord face to face. The reason is that the first item, śravaṇa, is very important. If hearing is from the right sources, it acts very quickly. Generally people hear from unauthorized persons. Such unauthorized persons may be very learned by academic qualifications, but because they do not follow the principles of devotional service, hearing from them becomes a sheer waste of time. Sometimes the texts are interpreted fashionably to suit their own purposes. Therefore, first one should select a competent and bona fide speaker and then hear from him. When the hearing process is perfect and complete, the other processes become automatically perfect in their own way.

There are different transcendental activities of the Lord, and each and every one of them is competent to bestow the desired result, provided the hearing process is perfect. In the Bhāgavatam the activities of the Lord begin from His dealings with the Pāṇḍavas. There are many other pastimes of the Lord in connection with His dealings with the asuras and others. And in the Tenth Canto the sublime dealings with His conjugal associates, the gopīs, as well as with His married wives at Dvārakā are mentioned. Since the Lord is absolute, there is no difference in the transcendental nature of each and every dealing of the Lord. But sometimes people, in an unauthorized hearing process, take more interest in hearing about His dealings with the gopīs. Such an inclination indicates the lusty feelings of the hearer, so a bona fide speaker of the dealings of the Lord never indulges in such hearings. One must hear about the Lord from the very beginning, as in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam or any other scriptures, and that will help the hearer attain perfection by progressive development. One should not, therefore, consider that His dealings with the Pāṇḍavas are less important than His dealings with the gopīs. We must always remember that the Lord is always transcendental to all mundane attachment. In all the above-mentioned dealings of the Lord, He is the hero in all circumstances, and hearing about Him or about His devotees or combatants is conducive to spiritual life. It is said that the Vedas and Purāṇas, etc., are all made to revive our lost relation with Him. Hearing of all these scriptures is essential.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Persons who constantly hear, sing, speak, remember and sing to others about your activities—they alone, without delay, are able to see your lotus feet which destroy the influence of material existence.
Commentary

This verse shows the actual reason for the Lord’s appearance. They and not others (eva) see for certain. It is not that they do not see. They see without delay (acireṇa), not after a long time, your lotus feet, not the lotus feet of one of your expansions. Those lotus feet destroy the influence of material existence rather than prolong material existence. Your form is not without qualities. In order to appreciate the beauty of the Lord, his six aspects need to be seen.

Those who continuously hear, chant and repeat Your transcendental activities certainly see Your lotus feet, which alone stop the repetition of birth and death. The path is simple and durable.
Reflection Questions
  • Which simple, repeatable practice could I make non-negotiable?
  • Where am I waiting for something more sophisticated than is required?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.37

↗
अप्यद्य नस्त्वं स्वकृतेहित प्रभो जिहाससि स्वित्सुहृदोऽनुजीविन: । येषां न चान्यद्भवत: पदाम्बुजात् परायणं राजसु योजितांहसाम् ॥ ३७ ॥
apy adya nas tvaṁ sva-kṛtehita prabho
[apy adya nas tvam sva-kritehita prabho]
jihāsasi svit suhṛdo ’nujīvinaḥ
[jihaasasi svit suhrido ’nujeevinah]
yeṣāṁ na cānyad bhavataḥ padāmbujāt
[yeshaam na chaanyad bhavatah padaambujaat]
parāyaṇaṁ rājasu yojitāṁhasām
[paraayanam raajasu yojitaamhasaam]
api — if adya — today naḥ — us tvam — You sva-kṛta — self-executed īhita — all duties prabho — O my Lord jihāsasi — giving up svit — possibly suhṛdaḥ — intimate friends anujīvinaḥ — living at the mercy of yeṣām — of whom na — nor ca — and anyat — anyone else bhavataḥ — Your pada-ambujāt — from the lotus feet parāyaṇam — dependent rājasu — unto the kings yojita — engaged in aṁhasām — enmity.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
apy adya nas tvaṁ sva-kṛtehita prabho
api
if
adya
today
naḥ
us
tvam
You
sva-kṛta
self-executed
jihāsasi svit suhṛdo ’nujīvinaḥ
īhita
all duties
prabho
O my Lord
jihāsasi
giving up
svit
possibly
yeṣāṁ na cānyad bhavataḥ padāmbujāt
parāyaṇaṁ rājasu yojitāṁhasām
suhṛdaḥ
intimate friends
anujīvinaḥ
living at the mercy of
yeṣām
of whom
na
nor
ca
and
anyat
anyone else
bhavataḥ
Your
pada-ambujāt
from the lotus feet
parāyaṇam
dependent
rājasu
unto the kings
yojita
engaged in
aṁhasām
enmity.
O my Lord, You have executed all duties Yourself. Are you leaving us today, though we are completely dependent on Your mercy and have no one else to protect us, now when all kings are at enmity with us?

The Pāṇḍavas are most fortunate because with all good luck they were entirely dependent on the mercy of the Lord. In the material world, to be dependent on the mercy of someone else is the utmost sign of misfortune, but in the case of our transcendental relation with the Lord, it is the most fortunate case when we can live completely dependent on Him. The material disease is due to thinking of becoming independent of everything. But the cruel material nature does not allow us to become independent. The false attempt to become independent of the stringent laws of nature is known as material advancement of experimental knowledge. The whole material world is moving on this false attempt of becoming independent of the laws of nature. Beginning from Rāvaṇa, who wanted to prepare a direct staircase to the planets of heaven, down to the present age, they are trying to overcome the laws of nature. They are trying now to approach distant planetary systems by electronic mechanical power. But the highest goal of human civilization is to work hard under the guidance of the Lord and become completely dependent on Him. The highest achievement of perfect civilization is to work with valor but at the same time depend completely on the Lord. The Pāṇḍavas were the ideal executors of this standard of civilization. Undoubtedly they were completely dependent on the good will of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but they were not idle parasites of the Lord. They were all highly qualified both by personal character and by physical activities. Still they always looked for the mercy of the Lord because they knew that every living being is dependent by constitutional position. The perfection of life is, therefore, to become dependent on the will of the Lord, instead of becoming falsely independent in the material world. Those who try to become falsely independent of the Lord are called anātha, or without any guardian, whereas those who are completely dependent on the will of the Lord are called sanātha, or those having someone to protect them. Therefore we must try to be sanātha so that we can always be protected from the unfavorable condition of material existence. By the deluding power of the external material nature we forget that the material condition of life is the most undesirable perplexity. The Bhagavad-gītā therefore directs us (7.19) that after many, many births one fortunate person becomes aware of the fact that Vāsudeva is all in all and that the best way of leading one’s life is to surrender unto Him completely. That is the sign of a mahātmā. All the members of the Pāṇḍava family were mahātmās in household life. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was the head of these mahātmās, and Queen Kuntīdevī was the mother. The lessons of the Bhagavad-gītā and all the Purāṇas, specifically the Bhāgavata Purāṇa, are therefore inevitably connected with the history of the Pāṇḍava mahātmās. For them, separation from the Lord was just like the separation of a fish from water. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī, therefore, felt such separation like a thunderbolt, and the whole prayer of the Queen is to try to persuade the Lord to stay with them. After the Battle of Kurukṣetra, although the inimical kings were killed, their sons and grandsons were still there to deal with the Pāṇḍavas. It is not only the Pāṇḍavas who were put into the condition of enmity, but all of us are always in such a condition, and the best way of living is to become completely dependent on the will of the Lord and thereby overcome all difficulties of material existence.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord! Do you, whose deeds are automatically accomplished, desire to reject us today, though we are your friends and depend on you? We, having created trouble with many kings, have no other shelter than your lotus feet.
Commentary

We, and not others, become happy on seeing you and suffer on not seeing you. The time of happiness has passed and the time of suffering has arrived.

“Do you desire to leave us today, since you desire to go to Dvārakā?”

“But I have stayed many days. Now I must go to Dvārakā. I have necessary work there. Please give your assent.”

To this Kuntī answers, “But you are the person whose necessary works are already accomplished. Your intentions fulfill themselves automatically (sva-kṛtehita). Some versions have the word without the visarga (ḥ). Then it would a vocative address to Kṛṣṇa, “O self-accomplisher!” The Pāṇḍavas had created suffering for many kings by killing their fathers or relatives. We depend on you (anujīvinaḥ). Therefore stay here and protect my sons.

Kuntī asks: are You leaving us today, who are completely dependent on Your mercy? The devotee can speak in pure protest, openly grieving the Lord's withdrawal. Honest complaint is a form of love.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I being too polite with the Lord when grief is what is real?
  • What 'don't go' do I need to voice in my own prayer?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.38

↗
के वयं नामरूपाभ्यां यदुभि: सह पाण्डवा: । भवतोऽदर्शनं यर्हि हृषीकाणामिवेशितु: ॥ ३८ ॥
ke vayaṁ nāma-rūpābhyāṁ
[ke vayam naama-roopaabhyaam]
yadubhiḥ saha pāṇḍavāḥ
[yadubhih saha paandavaah]
bhavato ’darśanaṁ yarhi
[bhavato ’darshanam yarhi]
hṛṣīkāṇām iveśituḥ
[hrisheekaanaam iveshituh]
ke — who are vayam — we nāma-rūpābhyām — without fame and ability yadubhiḥ — with the Yadus saha — along with pāṇḍavāḥ — and the Pāṇḍavas bhavataḥ — Your adarśanam — absence yarhi — as if hṛṣīkāṇām — of the senses iva — like īśituḥ — of the living being.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ke vayaṁ nāma-rūpābhyāṁ
ke
who are
vayam
we
nāma-rūpābhyām
without fame and ability
yadubhiḥ
with the Yadus
yadubhiḥ saha pāṇḍavāḥ
saha
along with
pāṇḍavāḥ
and the Pāṇḍavas
bhavato ’darśanaṁ yarhi
bhavataḥ
Your
adarśanam
absence
yarhi
as if
hṛṣīkāṇām iveśituḥ
hṛṣīkāṇām
of the senses
iva
like
īśituḥ
of the living being.
As the name and fame of a particular body is finished with the disappearance of the living spirit, similarly if You do not look upon us, all our fame and activities, along with the Pāṇḍavas and Yadus, will end at once.

Kuntīdevī is quite aware that the existence of the Pāṇḍavas is due to Śrī Kṛṣṇa only. The Pāṇḍavas are undoubtedly well established in name and fame and are guided by the great King Yudhiṣṭhira, who is morality personified, and the Yadus are undoubtedly great allies, but without the guidance of Lord Kṛṣṇa all of them are nonentities, as much as the senses of the body are useless without the guidance of consciousness. No one should be proud of his prestige, power and fame without being guided by the favor of the Supreme Lord. The living beings are always dependent, and the ultimate dependable object is the Lord Himself. We may, therefore, invent by our advancement of material knowledge all sorts of counteracting material resources, but without being guided by the Lord all such inventions end in fiasco, however strong and stout the reactionary elements may be.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Without your presence who are we, the Pāṇḍavas along with the Yadus with their fame and strength? We are like the senses without the jīva.
Commentary

“But Bhīma and Arjuna, your sons, are very powerful. The king is dharma personified and the Yādavas are your friends. You have no worries.”

Who are we Pāṇḍavas with the Yadus having fame (nāma) and ability (rūpa) without your presence? Similarly, without the presence of the jīva the senses have no significance or power.

As fame ends with the soul's exit, so our fame and activities end if You don't look upon us. Without the Lord's gaze, even the Pāṇḍavas and Yadus collapse. Borrowed lustre is no lustre at all.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'gaze' is actually fueling my current sense of meaning?
  • What part of my life would fall flat without His attention?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.39

↗
नेयं शोभिष्यते तत्र यथेदानीं गदाधर । त्वत्पदैरङ्किता भाति स्वलक्षणविलक्षितै: ॥ ३९ ॥
neyaṁ śobhiṣyate tatra
[neyam shobhishyate tatra]
yathedānīṁ gadādhara
[yathedaaneem gadaadhara]
tvat-padair aṅkitā bhāti
[tvat-padair ankitaa bhaati]
sva-lakṣaṇa-vilakṣitaiḥ
[sva-lakshana-vilakshitaih]
na — not iyam — this land of our kingdom śobhiṣyate — will appear beautiful tatra — then yathā — as it is now idānīm — now gadādhara — O Kṛṣṇa tvat — Your padaiḥ — by the feet aṅkitā — marked bhāti — is dazzling sva-lakṣaṇa — Your own marks vilakṣitaiḥ — by the impressions.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
neyaṁ śobhiṣyate tatra
yathedānīṁ gadādhara
tvat-padair aṅkitā bhāti
sva-lakṣaṇa-vilakṣitaiḥ
na
not
iyam
this land of our kingdom
śobhiṣyate
will appear beautiful
tatra
then
yathā
as it is now
idānīm
now
gadādhara
O Kṛṣṇa
tvat
Your
padaiḥ
by the feet
aṅkitā
marked
bhāti
is dazzling
sva-lakṣaṇa
Your own marks
vilakṣitaiḥ
by the impressions.
O Gadādhara [Kṛṣṇa], our kingdom is now being marked by the impressions of Your feet, and therefore it appears beautiful. But when You leave, it will no longer be so.

There are certain particular marks on the feet of the Lord which distinguish the Lord from others. The marks of a flag, thunderbolt, and instrument to drive an elephant, umbrella, lotus, disc, etc., are on the bottom of the Lord’s feet. These marks are impressed upon the soft dust of the land where the Lord traverses. The land of Hastināpura was thus marked while Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa was there with the Pāṇḍavas, and the kingdom of the Pāṇḍavas thus flourished by such auspicious signs. Kuntīdevī pointed out these distinguished features and was afraid of ill luck in the absence of the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O holder of the club! When you go, this land, marked with the special signs on your feet, will not glow as it does now.
Commentary

If you go there, this land (iyam) will not glow. The land is marked uniquely (vilakṣitaiḥ) with your signs -- the flag and thunderbolt.

Our kingdom is beautiful because it is marked by Your feet; when You leave, it will no longer be so. The land itself carries memory of presence. Beauty is an after-effect of God walking through.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'place' in my life is beautiful only because God once walked there?
  • Where could I leave 'footprints' that beautify a corner of the world?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.40

↗
इमे जनपदा: स्वृद्धा: सुपक्‍वौषधिवीरुध: । वनाद्रिनद्युदन्वन्तो ह्येधन्ते तव वीक्षितै: ॥ ४० ॥
ime jana-padāḥ svṛddhāḥ
[ime jana-padaah svriddhaah]
supakvauṣadhi-vīrudhaḥ
[supakvaushadhi-veerudhah]
vanādri-nady-udanvanto
[vanaadri-nady-udanvanto]
hy edhante tava vīkṣitaiḥ
[hy edhante tava veekshitaih]
ime — all these jana-padāḥ — cities and towns svṛddhāḥ — flourished supakva — mature auṣadhi — herbs vīrudhaḥ — vegetables vana — forests adri — hills nadī — rivers udanvantaḥ — seas hi — certainly edhante — increasing tava — by You vīkṣitaiḥ — seen.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ime jana-padāḥ svṛddhāḥ
ime
all these
jana-padāḥ
cities and towns
svṛddhāḥ
flourished
supakvauṣadhi-vīrudhaḥ
supakva
mature
auṣadhi
herbs
vīrudhaḥ
vegetables
vanādri-nady-udanvanto
vana
forests
adri
hills
nadī
rivers
udanvantaḥ
seas
hi
certainly
hy edhante tava vīkṣitaiḥ
edhante
increasing
tava
by You
vīkṣitaiḥ
seen.
All these cities and villages are flourishing in all respects because the herbs and grains are in abundance, the trees are full of fruits, the rivers are flowing, the hills are full of minerals and the oceans full of wealth. And this is all due to Your glancing over them.

Human prosperity flourishes by natural gifts and not by gigantic industrial enterprises. The gigantic industrial enterprises are products of a godless civilization, and they cause the destruction of the noble aims of human life. The more we go on increasing such troublesome industries to squeeze out the vital energy of the human being, the more there will be unrest and dissatisfaction of the people in general, although a few only can live lavishly by exploitation. The natural gifts such as grains and vegetables, fruits, rivers, the hills of jewels and minerals, and the seas full of pearls are supplied by the order of the Supreme, and as He desires, material nature produces them in abundance or restricts them at times. The natural law is that the human being may take advantage of these godly gifts by nature and satisfactorily flourish on them without being captivated by the exploitative motive of lording it over material nature. The more we attempt to exploit material nature according to our whims of enjoyment, the more we shall become entrapped by the reaction of such exploitative attempts. If we have sufficient grains, fruits, vegetables and herbs, then what is the necessity of running a slaughterhouse and killing poor animals? A man need not kill an animal if he has sufficient grains and vegetables to eat. The flow of river waters fertilizes the fields, and there is more than what we need. Minerals are produced in the hills, and the jewels in the ocean. If the human civilization has sufficient grains, minerals, jewels, water, milk, etc., then why should it hanker after terrible industrial enterprises at the cost of the labor of some unfortunate men? But all these natural gifts are dependent on the mercy of the Lord. What we need, therefore, is to be obedient to the laws of the Lord and achieve the perfection of human life by devotional service. The indications by Kuntīdevī are just to the point. She desires that God’s mercy be bestowed upon them so that natural prosperity be maintained by His grace.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This thriving land, filled with ripe herbs and fruit-laden trees, forests, mountains and rivers, has grown prosperous by your glance.
Cities flourish, herbs abundant, trees fruitful, rivers flowing, hills mineral-rich, oceans full — all because You look on us. Ecology and economy alike depend on divine glance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I taking ordinary abundance as natural rather than as grace?
  • What concrete sign of His glance is in front of me today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.41

↗
अथ विश्वेश विश्वात्मन् विश्वमूर्ते स्वकेषु मे । स्‍नेहपाशमिमं छिन्धि द‍ृढं पाण्डुषु वृष्णिषु ॥ ४१ ॥
atha viśveśa viśvātman
[atha vishvesha vishvaatman]
viśva-mūrte svakeṣu me
[vishva-moorte svakeshu me]
sneha-pāśam imaṁ chindhi
[sneha-paasham imam chindhi]
dṛḍhaṁ pāṇḍuṣu vṛṣṇiṣu
[dridham paandushu vrishnishu]
atha — therefore viśva-īśa — O Lord of the universe viśva-ātman — O soul of the universe viśva-mūrte — O personality of the universal form svakeṣu — unto my own kinsmen me — my sneha-pāśam — tie of affection imam — this chindhi — cut off dṛḍham — deep pāṇḍuṣu — for the Pāṇḍavas vṛṣṇiṣu — for the Vṛṣṇis also.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atha viśveśa viśvātman
atha
therefore
viśva-īśa
O Lord of the universe
viśva-ātman
O soul of the universe
viśva-mūrte svakeṣu me
viśva-mūrte
O personality of the universal form
svakeṣu
unto my own kinsmen
me
my
sneha-pāśam imaṁ chindhi
sneha-pāśam
tie of affection
imam
this
chindhi
cut off
dṛḍhaṁ pāṇḍuṣu vṛṣṇiṣu
dṛḍham
deep
pāṇḍuṣu
for the Pāṇḍavas
vṛṣṇiṣu
for the Vṛṣṇis also.
O Lord of the universe, soul of the universe, O personality of the form of the universe, please, therefore, sever my tie of affection for my kinsmen, the Pāṇḍavas and the Vṛṣṇis.

A pure devotee of the Lord is ashamed to ask anything in self-interest from the Lord. But the householders are sometimes obliged to ask favors from the Lord, being bound by the tie of family affection. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī was conscious of this fact, and therefore she prayed to the Lord to cut off the affectionate tie from her own kinsmen, the Pāṇḍavas and the Vṛṣṇis. The Pāṇḍavas are her own sons, and the Vṛṣṇis are the members of her paternal family. Kṛṣṇa was equally related to both the families. Both the families required the Lord’s help because both were dependent devotees of the Lord. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī wished Śrī Kṛṣṇa to remain with her sons the Pāṇḍavas, but by His doing so her paternal house would be bereft of the benefit. All these partialities troubled the mind of Kuntī, and therefore she desired to cut off the affectionate tie.

A pure devotee cuts off the limited ties of affection for his family and widens his activities of devotional service for all forgotten souls. The typical example is the band of Six Gosvāmīs, who followed the path of Lord Caitanya. All of them belonged to the most enlightened and cultured rich families of the higher castes, but for the benefit of the mass of population they left their comfortable homes and became mendicants. To cut off all family affection means to broaden the field of activities. Without doing this, no one can be qualified as a brāhmaṇa, a king, a public leader or a devotee of the Lord. The Personality of Godhead, as an ideal king, showed this by example. Śrī Rāmacandra cut off the tie of affection for His beloved wife to manifest the qualities of an ideal king.

Such personalities as a brāhmaṇa, a devotee, a king or a public leader must be very broad-minded in discharging their respective duties. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī was conscious of this fact, and being weak she prayed to be free from such bondage of family affection. The Lord is addressed as the Lord of the universe, or the Lord of the universal mind, indicating His all-powerful ability to cut the hard knot of family affection. Therefore, it is sometimes experienced that the Lord, out of His special affinity towards a weak devotee, breaks the family affection by force of circumstances arranged by His all-powerful energy. By doing so He causes the devotee to become completely dependent on Him and thus clears the path for his going back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Lord of all the universes! O life of all the universes! O form of all the universes! Please cut my strong bonds of affection for my relatives, the Pāṇḍavas and Yādavas.
Commentary

Both your departure from here and coming here are unfortunate: departure for the Pāṇḍavas and coming here for the Yādavas. Since she ends up with a disturbed mind in either case, Kuntī prays to cut off her ties of affection with both parties. You are the Lord of all the universes (viśveśa). You give life to all the universes (viśvātman). Though you are the form of the universe, being an ocean of mercy, you are always attentive in regards to the welfare of the Yādavas and Pāṇḍavas. Will I die uselessly by thinking of their welfare?

Sever my tie of affection for my kinsmen, the Pāṇḍavas and Vṛṣṇis. Even noble attachment can be a bond. The devotee asks for cutting, not preserving, those threads that compete with the Lord.
Reflection Questions
  • What noble attachment of mine quietly competes with my devotion?
  • Where do I want the Lord to leave my bonds intact because I find them comfortable?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.42

↗
त्वयि मेऽनन्यविषया मतिर्मधुपतेऽसकृत् । रतिमुद्वहतादद्धा गङ्गेवौघमुदन्वति ॥ ४२ ॥
tvayi me ’nanya-viṣayā
[tvayi me ’nanya-vishayaa]
matir madhu-pate ’sakṛt
[matir madhu-pate ’sakrit]
ratim udvahatād addhā
[ratim udvahataad addhaa]
gaṅgevaugham udanvati
[gangevaugham udanvati]
tvayi — unto You me — my ananya-viṣayā — unalloyed matiḥ — attention madhu-pate — O Lord of Madhu asakṛt — continuously ratim — attraction udvahatāt — may overflow addhā — directly gaṅgā — the Ganges iva — like ogham — flows udanvati — down to the sea.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvayi me ’nanya-viṣayā
tvayi
unto You
me
my
ananya-viṣayā
unalloyed
matir madhu-pate ’sakṛt
matiḥ
attention
madhu-pate
O Lord of Madhu
asakṛt
continuously
ratim udvahatād addhā
ratim
attraction
udvahatāt
may overflow
addhā
directly
gaṅgevaugham udanvati
gaṅgā
the Ganges
iva
like
ogham
flows
udanvati
down to the sea.
O Lord of Madhu, as the Ganges forever flows to the sea without hindrance, let my attraction be constantly drawn unto You without being diverted to anyone else.

Perfection of pure devotional service is attained when all attention is diverted towards the transcendental loving service of the Lord. To cut off the tie of all other affections does not mean complete negation of the finer elements, like affection for someone else. This is not possible. A living being, whoever he may be, must have this feeling of affection for others because this is a symptom of life. The symptoms of life, such as desire, anger, hankerings, feelings of attraction, etc., cannot be annihilated. Only the objective has to be changed. Desire cannot be negated, but in devotional service the desire is changed only for the service of the Lord in place of desire for sense gratification. The so-called affection for family, society, country, etc., consists of different phases of sense gratification. When this desire is changed for the satisfaction of the Lord, it is called devotional service.

In the Bhagavad-gītā we can see that Arjuna desired not to fight with his brothers and relations just to satisfy his own personal desires. But when he heard the message of the Lord, Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā, he changed his decision and served the Lord. And for his doing so, he became a famous devotee of the Lord, for it is declared in all the scriptures that Arjuna attained spiritual perfection by devotional service to the Lord in friendship. The fighting was there, the friendship was there, Arjuna was there, and Kṛṣṇa was there, but Arjuna became a different person by devotional service. Therefore, the prayers of Kuntī also indicate the same categorical changes in activities. Śrīmatī Kuntī wanted to serve the Lord without diversion, and that was her prayer. This unalloyed devotion is the ultimate goal of life. Our attention is usually diverted to the service of something which is nongodly or not in the program of the Lord. When the program is changed into the service of the Lord, that is to say when the senses are purified in relation with the service of the Lord, it is called pure unalloyed devotional service. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī wanted that perfection and prayed for it from the Lord.

Her affection for the Pāṇḍavas and the Vṛṣṇis is not out of the range of devotional service because the service of the Lord and the service of the devotees are identical. Sometimes service to the devotee is more valuable than service to the Lord. But here the affection of Kuntīdevī for the Pāṇḍavas and the Vṛṣṇis was due to family relation. This tie of affection in terms of material relation is the relation of māyā because the relations of the body or the mind are due to the influence of the external energy. Relations of the soul, established in relation with the Supreme Soul, are factual relations. When Kuntīdevī wanted to cut off the family relation, she meant to cut off the relation of the skin. The skin relation is the cause of material bondage, but the relation of the soul is the cause of freedom. This relation of the soul to the soul can be established by the medium of the relation with the Supersoul. Seeing in the darkness is not seeing. But seeing by the light of the sun means to see the sun and everything else which was unseen in the darkness. That is the way of devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Let my mind, with attention fixed on no other object, repeatedly carry its affection to you, chief of the Madhu dynasty, just as the Gaṅgā carries a full stream of water to the ocean.
Commentary

“Then do you want realization of brahman? Because if you cut your affection for the Yādavas, you will cut your affection for me also.”

May my mind hold (udvahatāt) affection (rati) for you, without any obstacle. Udvah means to flow strongly. The mind should not think of anything else (ananya-viṣayā). Your devotees are non-different from you and thus without affection for them affection for you cannot take place. It is not possible that this could please you. This I know. Therefore let my mind have attraction for no one except you and your devotees. I prayed to cut affectionate bonds with the Pāṇḍavas and Yādavas who are your devotees. But since it is a prayer in front of you it means cutting only the material affection which arises from bodily identification. It is not cutting the affectionate relation with you. I want to cut that affection which causes bondage. Just as the Gaṅgā carries a full stream of water (ogham) to the ocean, the shelter of small and large rivers, may my mind also carry its affection to you, who are the shelter of all the devotees. Just as the Gaṅgā does not consider any obstacles on its course, my mind also should not consider any obstacles that may rise while thinking of you.

As the Ganges flows to the sea without hindrance, let my attraction flow to You without diversion. The river is one image of single-pointed devotion. Steady current, not violent leap.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my attraction diverted into a thousand tributaries?
  • What would 'flowing without hindrance' look like for me this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.43

↗
श्रीकृष्ण कृष्णसख वृष्ण्यृषभावनिध्रुग् राजन्यवंशदहनानपवर्गवीर्य । गोविन्द गोद्विजसुरार्तिहरावतार योगेश्वराखिलगुरो भगवन्नमस्ते ॥ ४३ ॥
śrī-kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa-sakha vṛṣṇy-ṛṣabhāvani-dhrug-
[shree-krishna krishna-sakha vrishny-rishabhaavani-dhrug-]
rājanya-vaṁśa-dahanānapavarga-vīrya
[raajanya-vamsha-dahanaanapavarga-veerya]
govinda go-dvija-surārti-harāvatāra
[govinda go-dvija-suraarti-haraavataara]
yogeśvarākhila-guro bhagavan namas te
[yogeshvaraakhila-guro bhagavan namas te]
śrī-kṛṣṇa — O Śrī Kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa-sakha — O friend of Arjuna vṛṣṇi — of descendants of Vṛṣṇi ṛṣabha — O chief avani — the earth dhruk — rebellious rājanya-vaṁśa — dynasties of the kings dahana — O annihilator anapavarga — without deterioration of vīrya — prowess govinda — O proprietor of Golokadhāma go — of the cows dvija — the brāhmaṇas sura — the demigods arti-hara — to relieve distress avatāra — O Lord who descends yoga-īśvara — O master of all mystic powers akhila — universal guro — O preceptor bhagavan — O possessor of all opulences namaḥ te — respectful obeisances unto You.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa-sakha vṛṣṇy-ṛṣabhāvani-dhrug-
śrī-kṛṣṇa
O Śrī Kṛṣṇa
kṛṣṇa-sakha
O friend of Arjuna
vṛṣṇi
of descendants of Vṛṣṇi
ṛṣabha
O chief
avani
the earth
dhruk
rebellious
rājanya-vaṁśa-dahanānapavarga-vīrya
rājanya-vaṁśa
dynasties of the kings
dahana
O annihilator
anapavarga
without deterioration of
vīrya
prowess
govinda go-dvija-surārti-harāvatāra
govinda
O proprietor of Golokadhāma
go
of the cows
dvija
the brāhmaṇas
sura
the demigods
arti-hara
to relieve distress
avatāra
O Lord who descends
yogeśvarākhila-guro bhagavan namas te
yoga-īśvara
O master of all mystic powers
akhila
universal
guro
O preceptor
bhagavan
O possessor of all opulences
namaḥ te
respectful obeisances unto You.
O Kṛṣṇa, O friend of Arjuna, O chief amongst the descendants of Vṛṣṇi, You are the destroyer of those political parties which are disturbing elements on this earth. Your prowess never deteriorates. You are the proprietor of the transcendental abode, and You descend to relieve the distresses of the cows, the brāhmaṇas and the devotees. You possess all mystic powers, and You are the preceptor of the entire universe. You are the almighty God, and I offer You my respectful obeisances.

A summary of the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is made herein by Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī. The almighty Lord has His eternal transcendental abode where He is engaged in keeping surabhi cows. He is served by hundreds and thousands of goddesses of fortune. He descends to the material world to reclaim His devotees and to annihilate the disturbing elements in groups of political parties and kings who are supposed to be in charge of administration work. He creates, maintains and annihilates by His unlimited energies, and still He is always full with prowess and does not deteriorate in potency. The cows, the brāhmaṇas and the devotees of the Lord are all objects of His special attention because they are very important factors for the general welfare of living beings.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Kṛṣṇa! Of friend of Arjuna! Best of the Yādavas! Destroyer of the kings who harmed the earth! Lord of undiminished strength! Lord of all the cows! Destroyer of the suffering of the cows, brāhmaṇas and devatās! Master of yoga! Guru of all people! O Lord! I offer respects to you.
Commentary

After offering her prayers she offers respects while remembering how the Lord gave happiness to all people. Kṛṣṇa-sakha means friend of Arjuna. You destroyed the dynasties of kings who injured the earth. You have undiminished strength (anapavarga-vīrya). You have a wealth of kama-dhenus (govinda).

Kṛṣṇa, destroyer of those political parties disturbing earth, proprietor of the transcendental abode — Your prowess never deteriorates. He is the one stable power in shifting times.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'never-deteriorating' anchor do I have in unstable seasons?
  • Where am I trusting political or worldly powers more than the Lord's quiet sovereignty?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.44

↗
सूत उवाच पृथयेत्थं कलपदै: परिणूताखिलोदय: । मन्दं जहास वैकुण्ठो मोहयन्निव मायया ॥ ४४ ॥
sūta uvāca
[soota uvaacha]
pṛthayetthaṁ kala-padaiḥ
[prithayettham kala-padaih]
pariṇūtākhilodayaḥ
[parinootaakhilodayah]
mandaṁ jahāsa vaikuṇṭho
[mandam jahaasa vaikuntho]
mohayann iva māyayā
[mohayann iva maayayaa]
sūtaḥ uvāca — Sūta said pṛthayā — by Pṛthā (Kuntī) ittham — this kala-padaiḥ — by chosen words pariṇūta — being worshiped akhila — universal udayaḥ — glories mandam — mildly jahāsa — smiled vaikuṇṭhaḥ — the Lord mohayan — captivating iva — like māyayā — His mystic power.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sūta uvāca
sūtaḥ uvāca
Sūta said
pṛthayetthaṁ kala-padaiḥ
pṛthayā
by Pṛthā (Kuntī)
ittham
this
kala-padaiḥ
by chosen words
pariṇūta
being worshiped
pariṇūtākhilodayaḥ
akhila
universal
udayaḥ
glories
mandaṁ jahāsa vaikuṇṭho
mandam
mildly
jahāsa
smiled
vaikuṇṭhaḥ
the Lord
mohayann iva māyayā
mohayan
captivating
iva
like
māyayā
His mystic power.
Sūta Gosvāmī said: The Lord, thus hearing the prayers of Kuntīdevī, composed in choice words for His glorification, mildly smiled. That smile was as enchanting as His mystic power.

Anything that is enchanting in the world is said to be a representation of the Lord. The conditioned souls, who are engaged in trying to lord it over the material world, are also enchanted by His mystic powers, but His devotees are enchanted in a different way by the glories of the Lord, and His merciful blessings are upon them. His energy is displayed in different ways, as electrical energy works in manifold capacities. Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī has prayed to the Lord just to enunciate a fragment of His glories. All His devotees worship Him in that way, by chosen words, and therefore the Lord is known as Uttamaśloka. No amount of chosen words is sufficient to enumerate the Lord’s glory, and yet He is satisfied by such prayers as the father is satisfied even by the broken linguistic attempts of the growing child. The word māyā is used both in the sense of delusion and mercy. Herein the word māyā is used in the sense of the Lord’s mercy upon Kuntīdevī.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Suta said: The Lord, whose greatness had been glorified by the sweet words of Kuntī, smiled softly as if bewildered by prema.
Commentary

Pariṇūta comes from the verb pariṇu of the tud class. With the long vowel it means “to praise.” The Lord was bewildered, not by material māyā but by prema.

The Lord, hearing Kuntī's prayers, mildly smiled — that smile enchanting as His mystic power. A smile, freely given, can carry more divine reality than any miracle.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose smile in my life is its own kind of mercy?
  • What would I share if a smile were the only thing I had to give today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.45

↗
तां बाढमित्युपामन्‍त्र्य प्रविश्य गजसाह्वयम् । स्त्रियश्च स्वपुरं यास्यन् प्रेम्णा राज्ञा निवारित: ॥ ४५ ॥
tāṁ bāḍham ity upāmantrya
[taam baadham ity upaamantrya]
praviśya gajasāhvayam
[pravishya gajasaahvayam]
striyaś ca sva-puraṁ yāsyan
[striyash cha sva-puram yaasyan]
premṇā rājñā nivāritaḥ
[premnaa raajnaa nivaaritah]
tām — all those bāḍham — accepted iti — thus upāmantrya — subsequently informed praviśya — entering gajasāhvayam — the palace of Hastināpura striyaḥ ca — other ladies sva-puram — own residence yāsyan — while starting for premṇā — with love rājñā — by the King nivāritaḥ — stopped.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāṁ bāḍham ity upāmantrya
tām
all those
bāḍham
accepted
iti
thus
upāmantrya
subsequently informed
praviśya gajasāhvayam
praviśya
entering
gajasāhvayam
the palace of Hastināpura
striyaś ca sva-puraṁ yāsyan
striyaḥ ca
other ladies
sva-puram
own residence
yāsyan
while starting for
premṇā rājñā nivāritaḥ
premṇā
with love
rājñā
by the King
nivāritaḥ
stopped.
Thus accepting the prayers of Śrīmatī Kuntīdevī, the Lord subsequently informed other ladies of His departure by entering the palace of Hastināpura. But upon preparing to leave, He was stopped by King Yudhiṣṭhira, who implored Him lovingly.

No one could make Lord Kṛṣṇa stay at Hastināpura when He decided to start for Dvārakā, but the simple request of King Yudhiṣṭhira that the Lord remain there for a few days more was immediately effective. This signifies that the power of King Yudhiṣṭhira was loving affection, which the Lord could not deny. The almighty God is thus conquered only by loving service and nothing else. He is fully independent in all His dealings, but He voluntarily accepts obligations by the loving affection of His pure devotees.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Agreeing with her, Kṛṣṇa entered Hastināpura. Wanting to leave for his city, he took permission from Kuntī and the other women. He was prevented from leaving by Yudhiṣṭhira out his great love for Kṛṣṇa.
Commentary

Kuntī had prayed that her mind be concentrated only on the Lord. Kṛṣṇa accepted that. He then went away from the chariot stable and returned to Hastināpura. He then took permission to leave from Kuntī and the other women headed by Subhadrā. As he was about to go to Dvārakā, Yudhiṣṭhira prevented him, begging that he stay a little longer. This indicates that Kṛṣṇa was completely controlled by the love of the king.

Accepting her prayers, He informed the other ladies of His departure but was stopped by Yudhiṣṭhira's loving plea. Sometimes love's request slows even God. Asking the Lord to stay is allowed.
Reflection Questions
  • What am I afraid to ask the Lord for because I think He has other plans?
  • Where could my own loving plea matter more than I credit?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.46

↗
व्यासाद्यैरीश्वरेहाज्ञै: कृष्णेनाद्भुतकर्मणा । प्रबोधितोऽपीतिहासैर्नाबुध्यत शुचार्पित: ॥ ४६ ॥
vyāsādyair īśvarehājñaiḥ
[vyaasaadyair eeshvarehaajnaih]
kṛṣṇenādbhuta-karmaṇā
[krishnenaadbhuta-karmanaa]
prabodhito ’pītihāsair
[prabodhito ’peetihaasair]
nābudhyata śucārpitaḥ
[naabudhyata shuchaarpitah]
vyāsa-ādyaiḥ — by great sages headed by Vyāsa īśvara — the almighty God īhā — by the will of jñaiḥ — by the learned kṛṣṇena — by Kṛṣṇa Himself adbhuta-karmaṇā — by one who performs all superhuman work prabodhitaḥ — being solaced api — although itihāsaiḥ — by evidences from the histories na — not abudhyata — satisfied śucā arpitaḥ — distressed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vyāsādyair īśvarehājñaiḥ
vyāsa-ādyaiḥ
by great sages headed by Vyāsa
īśvara
the almighty God
īhā
by the will of
jñaiḥ
by the learned
kṛṣṇenādbhuta-karmaṇā
kṛṣṇena
by Kṛṣṇa Himself
adbhuta-karmaṇā
by one who performs all superhuman work
prabodhito ’pītihāsair
prabodhitaḥ
being solaced
api
although
itihāsaiḥ
by evidences from the histories
nābudhyata śucārpitaḥ
na
not
abudhyata
satisfied
śucā arpitaḥ
distressed.
King Yudhiṣṭhira, who was much aggrieved, could not be convinced, despite instructions by great sages headed by Vyāsa and the Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself, the performer of superhuman feats, and despite all historical evidence.

The pious King Yudhiṣṭhira was mortified because of the mass massacre of human beings in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, especially on his account. Duryodhana was there on the throne, and he was doing well in his administration, and in one sense there was no need of fighting. But on the principle of justice Yudhiṣṭhira was to replace him. The whole clique of politics centered around this point, and all the kings and residents of the whole world became involved in this fight between the rival brothers. Lord Kṛṣṇa was also there on the side of King Yudhiṣṭhira. It is said in the Mahābhārata, Ādi-parva (2.25) that 640,000,000 men were killed in the eighteen days of the Battle of Kurukṣetra, and some hundreds of thousands were missing. Practically this was the greatest battle in the world within five thousand years.

This mass killing simply to enthrone Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was too mortifying, so he tried to be convinced with evidences from histories by great sages like Vyāsa and the Lord Himself that the fight was just because the cause was just. But Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira would not be satisfied, even though he was instructed by the greatest personalities of the time. Kṛṣṇa is designated herein as the performer of superhuman actions, but in this particular instance neither He nor Vyāsa could convince King Yudhiṣṭhira. Does it mean that He failed to be a superhuman actor? No, certainly not. The interpretation is that the Lord as īśvara, or the Supersoul in the hearts of both King Yudhiṣṭhira and Vyāsa, performed still more superhuman action because the Lord desired it. As Supersoul of King Yudhiṣṭhira, He did not allow the King to be convinced by the words of Vyāsa and others, including Himself, because He desired that the King hear instructions from the dying Bhīṣmadeva, who was another great devotee of the Lord. The Lord wanted that at the last stage of his material existence the great warrior Bhīṣmadeva see Him personally and see his beloved grandchildren, King Yudhiṣṭhira, etc., now situated on the throne, and thus pass away very peacefully. Bhīṣmadeva was not at all satisfied to fight against the Pāṇḍavas, who were his beloved fatherless grandchildren. But the kṣatriyas are also very stern people, and therefore he was obliged to take the side of Duryodhana because he was maintained at the expense of Duryodhana. Besides this, the Lord also desired that King Yudhiṣṭhira be pacified by the words of Bhīṣmadeva so that the world could see that Bhīṣmadeva excelled all in knowledge, including the Lord Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Though instructed through stories by Vyāsa and other sages who did not know the Lord’s intention, and though even instructed by Kṛṣṇa, who had performed the remarkable action of bewildering Yudhiṣṭhira at this moment, Yudhiṣṭhira became overcome with grief, and could not understand those instructions.
Commentary

Since I am not staying here, I will make my devotee Bhīṣma happy by showing myself along with my followers to him since he does not want to die without seeing me, and his death is now approaching. I will have him instruct Yudhiṣṭhira in order to spread his glories to the world. This verse conveys this wish of the Lord.

Vyāsādyair īśvarehājñaiḥ means “by Vyāsa and other sages who either knew or did not know the above-mentioned intention of the Lord.” Kṛṣṇa performed a remarkable action (adbhūta-karmaṇā) of entering Yudhiṣṭhira’s heart and making him lose his sense of judgment. Kṛṣṇa made him completely incapable of understanding the teachings of himself and Vyāsa. By having Bhīṣma enlighten him, the Lord announced to the world that Bhīsma, his pure devotee, had more knowledge of dharma than Vyāsa, other sages, or even Kṛṣṇa. But because Yudhiṣṭhira had even greater prema for Kṛṣṇa than Bhīṣma, Kṛṣṇa, though going to Dvārakā, stayed back with him because of his request. Having approached Yudhiṣṭhira, he then created this loss of judgment in Yudhiṣṭhira.

Yudhiṣṭhira could not be consoled even by Vyāsa and Kṛṣṇa and historical evidence. Some griefs resist even sage counsel. Sitting with the inconsolable is its own form of holy work.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose grief refuses my comfort — and can I sit with it anyway?
  • Where am I trying too hard to fix what should be witnessed?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.47

↗
आह राजा धर्मसुतश्चिन्तयन् सुहृदां वधम् । प्राकृतेनात्मना विप्रा: स्‍नेहमोहवशं गत: ॥ ४७ ॥
āha rājā dharma-sutaś
[aaha raajaa dharma-sutash]
cintayan suhṛdāṁ vadham
[chintayan suhridaam vadham]
prākṛtenātmanā viprāḥ
[praakritenaatmanaa vipraah]
sneha-moha-vaśaṁ gataḥ
[sneha-moha-vasham gatah]
āha — said rājā — King Yudhiṣṭhira dharma-sutaḥ — the son of Dharma (Yamarāja) cintayan — thinking of suhṛdām — of the friends vadham — killing prākṛtena — by material conception only ātmanā — by the self viprāḥ — O brāhmaṇa sneha — affection moha — delusion vaśam — being carried away by gataḥ — having gone.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āha rājā dharma-sutaś
āha
said
rājā
King Yudhiṣṭhira
dharma-sutaḥ
the son of Dharma (Yamarāja)
cintayan suhṛdāṁ vadham
cintayan
thinking of
suhṛdām
of the friends
vadham
killing
prākṛtenātmanā viprāḥ
prākṛtena
by material conception only
ātmanā
by the self
viprāḥ
O brāhmaṇa
sneha-moha-vaśaṁ gataḥ
sneha
affection
moha
delusion
vaśam
being carried away by
gataḥ
having gone.
King Yudhiṣṭhira, son of Dharma, overwhelmed by the death of his friends, was aggrieved just like a common, materialistic man. O sages, thus deluded by affection, he began to speak.

King Yudhiṣṭhira, though he was not expected to become aggrieved like a common man, became deluded by worldly affection by the will of the Lord (just as Arjuna was apparently deluded). A man who sees knows well that the living entity is neither the body nor the mind, but is transcendental to the material conception of life. The common man thinks of violence and nonviolence in terms of the body, but that is a kind of delusion. Everyone is duty-bound according to one’s occupational duties. A kṣatriya is bound to fight for the right cause, regardless of the opposite party. In such discharge of duty, one should not be disturbed by annihilation of the material body, which is only an external dress of the living soul. All this was perfectly known to Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, but by the will of the Lord he became just like a common man because there was another great idea behind this delusion: the King would be instructed by Bhīṣma as Arjuna was instructed by the Lord Himself.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇas! Yudhiṣṭhira, thinking of the killing of his friends, overcome with bewilderment arising from affection, due to material thinking, then spoke.
Commentary

This verse describes Yudhiṣṭhira’s loss of discrimination. Though his self was actually spiritual, he thought of himself materially (prākṛtena ātmanā). But this was only a temporary imposition, by the Lord’s desire, so that the Lord’s plan could be carried out.

King Yudhiṣṭhira, deluded by affection, began to speak like a common materialistic man. Even great souls sometimes process loss like ordinary people. There is no shame in it; only in not eventually rising.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I currently processing pain in 'ordinary' ways and is that OK for now?
  • What signals will tell me when to stand back up?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.48

↗
अहो मे पश्यताज्ञानं हृदि रूढं दुरात्मन: । पारक्यस्यैव देहस्य बह्‍व्यो मेऽक्षौहिणीर्हता: ॥ ४८ ॥
aho me paśyatājñānaṁ
[aho me pashyataajnaanam]
hṛdi rūḍhaṁ durātmanaḥ
[hridi roodham duraatmanah]
pārakyasyaiva dehasya
[paarakyasyaiva dehasya]
bahvyo me ’kṣauhiṇīr hatāḥ
[bahvyo me ’kshauhineer hataah]
aho — O me — my paśyata — just see ajñānam — ignorance hṛdi — in the heart rūḍham — situated in durātmanaḥ — of the sinful pārakyasya — meant for others eva — certainly dehasya — of the body bahvyaḥ — many, many me — by me akṣauhiṇīḥ — combination of military phalanxes hatāḥ — killed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
aho me paśyatājñānaṁ
aho
O
me
my
paśyata
just see
ajñānam
ignorance
hṛdi rūḍhaṁ durātmanaḥ
hṛdi
in the heart
rūḍham
situated in
durātmanaḥ
of the sinful
pārakyasyaiva dehasya
pārakyasya
meant for others
eva
certainly
dehasya
of the body
bahvyo me ’kṣauhiṇīr hatāḥ
bahvyaḥ
many, many
me
by me
akṣauhiṇīḥ
combination of military phalanxes
hatāḥ
killed.
King Yudhiṣṭhira said: O my lot! I am the most sinful man! Just see my heart, which is full of ignorance! This body, which is ultimately meant for others, has killed many, many phalanxes of men.

A solid phalanx of 21,870 chariots, 21,870 elephants, 109,650 infantry and 65,600 cavalry is called an akṣauhiṇī. And many akṣauhiṇīs were killed on the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, as the most pious king of the world, takes for himself the responsibility for killing such a huge number of living beings because the battle was fought to reinstate him on the throne. This body is, after all, meant for others. While there is life in the body, it is meant for the service of others, and when it is dead it is meant to be eaten by dogs and jackals or maggots. He is sorry because for such a temporary body such a huge massacre was committed.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Oh! Look at the ignorance spread over my evil heart. Just for my body which is fit for the jackals’ food, I have killed many armies.
Commentary

For my body which is food for dogs and jackals (pārakyasya) I have killed many akṣauhinīs. Vyāsa has described the akṣauhiṇī.

akṣauhiṇī prasaṁkhyātā rathānāṁ dvija-sattamāḥ | saṁkhyā-gaṇana-tattva-jñaiḥ sahasrāny eka-viṁśatiḥ || śatāny upari caivāṣṭau tathā bhūyaś ca saptatiḥ | gajānāṁ ca prasaṁkhyānam etad eva prakīrtitam || jñeyaṁ śata-sahasraṁ tu sahasrāni navaiva tu | nārāṇām api pañcāśacchatāni trīṇi caiva hi || pañca-ṣaṣṭhi-sahasrāṇi tathāśvānāṁ śatāni ca | daśottarāṇi ṣaṭ prāhuḥ saṁkhyā-tattva-vido janāḥ | etām akṣauhiṇīṁ prāhur yathāvad iha saṁkhyayā ||

O best of the brāhmaṇas! Those who understand counting know that an akṣauhiṇī consists of 21,870 chariots and the same number of elephants. It has 109,350 foot soldiers. It has 65,610 horses.

Yudhiṣṭhira: I am the most sinful, my heart full of ignorance, this body has killed many. Even righteous war leaves the warrior haunted. Moral injury is real.
Reflection Questions
  • What past action of mine still feels heavy even though I was 'in the right'?
  • Where do I need to receive forgiveness rather than just claim justification?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.49

↗
बालद्विजसुहृन्मित्रपितृभ्रातृगुरुद्रुह: । न मे स्यान्निरयान्मोक्षो ह्यपि वर्षायुतायुतै: ॥ ४९ ॥
bāla-dvija-suhṛn-mitra-
[baala-dvija-suhrin-mitra-]
pitṛ-bhrātṛ-guru-druhaḥ
[pitri-bhraatri-guru-druhah]
na me syān nirayān mokṣo
[na me syaan nirayaan moksho]
hy api varṣāyutāyutaiḥ
[hy api varshaayutaayutaih]
bāla — boys dvi-ja — the twice-born suhṛt — well-wishers mitra — friends pitṛ — parents bhrātṛ — brothers guru — preceptors druhaḥ — one who has killed na — never me — my syāt — there shall be nirayāt — from hell mokṣaḥ — liberation hi — certainly api — although varṣa — years ayuta — millions āyutaiḥ — being added.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bāla-dvija-suhṛn-mitra-
bāla
boys
dvi-ja
the twice-born
suhṛt
well-wishers
mitra
friends
pitṛ-bhrātṛ-guru-druhaḥ
pitṛ
parents
bhrātṛ
brothers
guru
preceptors
druhaḥ
one who has killed
na me syān nirayān mokṣo
na
never
me
my
syāt
there shall be
nirayāt
from hell
mokṣaḥ
liberation
hi
certainly
hy api varṣāyutāyutaiḥ
api
although
varṣa
years
ayuta
millions
āyutaiḥ
being added.
I have killed many boys, brāhmaṇas, well-wishers, friends, parents, preceptors and brothers. Though I live millions of years, I will not be relieved from the hell that awaits me for all these sins.

Whenever there is a war, there is certainly a massacre of many innocent living beings, such as boys, brāhmaṇas and women, whose killing is considered to be the greatest of sins. They are all innocent creatures, and in all circumstances killing of them is forbidden in the scriptures. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira was aware of these mass killings. Similarly, there were friends, parents and preceptors also on both sides, and all of them were killed. It was simply horrible for him to think of such killing, and therefore he was thinking of residing in hell for millions and billions of years.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Because I have killed children, brāhmaṇas, relatives, friends, paternal uncles, cousins, and gurus, I cannot be free from hellish punishments for ten thousand years.
Commentary

Suhrt here means relatives and mitra means friends. Pitṛ means paternal uncles.

I have killed boys, brāhmaṇas, well-wishers, friends, parents, preceptors, brothers. Even millions of years won't relieve me from hell. The conscience of the righteous is more sensitive, not less.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my conscience harder on me than the law would be?
  • What does it mean to live as if some debts truly cannot be paid by us alone?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.50

↗
नैनो राज्ञ: प्रजाभर्तुर्धर्मयुद्धे वधो द्विषाम् । इति मे न तु बोधाय कल्पते शासनं वच: ॥ ५० ॥
naino rājñaḥ prajā-bhartur
[naino raajnah prajaa-bhartur]
dharma-yuddhe vadho dviṣām
[dharma-yuddhe vadho dvishaam]
iti me na tu bodhāya
[iti me na tu bodhaaya]
kalpate śāsanaṁ vacaḥ
[kalpate shaasanam vachah]
na — never enaḥ — sins rājñaḥ — of the king prajā-bhartuḥ — of one who is engaged in the maintenance of the citizens dharma — for the right cause yuddhe — in the fight vadhaḥ — killing dviṣām — of the enemies iti — all these me — for me na — never tu — but bodhāya — for satisfaction kalpate — they are meant for administration śāsanam — injunction vacaḥ — words of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naino rājñaḥ prajā-bhartur
na
never
dharma-yuddhe vadho dviṣām
iti me na tu bodhāya
enaḥ
sins
rājñaḥ
of the king
prajā-bhartuḥ
of one who is engaged in the maintenance of the citizens
dharma
for the right cause
yuddhe
in the fight
kalpate śāsanaṁ vacaḥ
vadhaḥ
killing
dviṣām
of the enemies
iti
all these
me
for me
na
never
tu
but
bodhāya
for satisfaction
kalpate
they are meant for administration
śāsanam
injunction
vacaḥ
words of.
There is no sin for a king who kills for the right cause, who is engaged in maintaining his citizens. But this injunction is not applicable to me.

Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira thought that although he was not actually involved in the administration of the kingdom, which was being carried on well by Duryodhana without harm to the citizens, he caused the killing of so many living beings only for his personal gain of the kingdom from the hands of Duryodhana. The killing was committed not in the course of administration but for the sake of self-aggrandizement, and as such he thought himself responsible for all the sins.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
There is no sin for the king who kills the enemy in a righteous war, protecting the citizens. This rule does not apply to me.
Commentary

Killing the enemy is not a sin. This rule does not apply, since it is an instruction for one who is protecting the people. One is permitted to kill those who are killing one’s citizens. Since Duryodhana was protecting the citizens, I have committed sins, since I have killed only out of greed for a kingdom.

There is no sin for a king who kills for just cause and protects citizens — but this rule doesn't apply to me. He won't let himself off on a technicality. Maturity is being harder on ourselves than our role permits.
Reflection Questions
  • What rule could 'excuse' me that my conscience refuses?
  • Where am I rightly refusing to grant myself an out?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.51

↗
स्त्रीणां मद्धतबन्धूनां द्रोहो योऽसाविहोत्थित: । कर्मभिर्गृहमेधीयैर्नाहं कल्पो व्यपोहितुम् ॥ ५१ ॥
strīṇāṁ mad-dhata-bandhūnāṁ
[streenaam mad-dhata-bandhoonaam]
droho yo ’sāv ihotthitaḥ
[droho yo ’saav ihotthitah]
karmabhir gṛhamedhīyair
[karmabhir grihamedheeyair]
nāhaṁ kalpo vyapohitum
[naaham kalpo vyapohitum]
strīṇām — of the women mat — by me hata-bandhūnām — of the friends who are killed drohaḥ — enmity yaḥ — that asau — all those iha — herewith utthitaḥ — has accrued karmabhiḥ — by dint of work gṛhamedhīyaiḥ — by persons engaged in material welfare na — never aham — I kalpaḥ — can expect vyapohitum — undoing the same.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
strīṇāṁ mad-dhata-bandhūnāṁ
strīṇām
of the women
mat
by me
hata-bandhūnām
of the friends who are killed
droho yo ’sāv ihotthitaḥ
drohaḥ
enmity
karmabhir gṛhamedhīyair
yaḥ
that
asau
all those
iha
herewith
utthitaḥ
has accrued
nāhaṁ kalpo vyapohitum
karmabhiḥ
by dint of work
gṛhamedhīyaiḥ
by persons engaged in material welfare
na
never
aham
I
kalpaḥ
can expect
vyapohitum
undoing the same.
I have killed many friends of women, and I have thus caused enmity to such an extent that it is not possible to undo it by material welfare work.

The gṛhamedhīs are those whose only business is to perform welfare work for the sake of material prosperity. Such material prosperity is sometimes hampered by sinful activities, for the materialist is sure to commit sins, even unintentionally, in the course of discharging material duties. To get relief from such sinful reactions, the Vedas prescribe several kinds of sacrifices. It is said in the Vedas that by performing the aśvamedha-yajña (horse sacrifice) one can get relief from even brahma-hatyā (killing of a brāhmaṇa ).

Yudhiṣṭhira Mahārāja performed this aśvamedha-yajña , but he thinks that even by performing such yajñas it is not possible to get relief from the great sins committed. In war either the husband or the brother or even the father or sons go to fight. And when they are killed, a fresh enmity is created, and thus a chain of actions and reactions increases which is not possible to be counteracted even by thousands of aśvamedha-yajñas.

The way of work ( karma ) is like that. It creates one action and another reaction simultaneously and thus increases the chain of material activities, binding the performer in material bondage. In the Bhagavad-gītā (9.27-28) the remedy is suggested that such actions and reactions of the path of work can be checked only when work is done on behalf of the Supreme Lord. The Battle of Kurukṣetra was actually fought by the will of the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, as it is evident from His version, and only by His will was Yudhiṣṭhira placed on the throne of Hastināpura. Therefore, factually no sin whatsoever touched the Pāṇḍavas, who were only the order carriers of the Lord. For others, who declare war out of personal interest, the whole responsibility lies on them.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I cannot counteract the injury I have inflicted on the women, whose husbands or sons I have killed, by household rituals.
Commentary

Mad-dhata-bandhūnāṁ means “women whose husbands I have killed.” Kalpaḥ means capable.

I have killed many friends of women, and caused enmity that material welfare work cannot undo. Some harms can't be repaired by good deeds. They require a different kind of resolution.
Reflection Questions
  • What harm of mine refuses to be erased by my later good works?
  • Where do I need surrender, not compensation, to truly heal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.8.52

↗
यथा पङ्केन पङ्काम्भ: सुरया वा सुराकृतम् । भूतहत्यां तथैवैकां न यज्ञैर्मार्ष्टुमर्हति ॥ ५२ ॥
yathā paṅkena paṅkāmbhaḥ
[yathaa pankena pankaambhah]
surayā vā surākṛtam
[surayaa vaa suraakritam]
bhūta-hatyāṁ tathaivaikāṁ
[bhoota-hatyaam tathaivaikaam]
na yajñair mārṣṭum arhati
[na yajnair maarshtum arhati]
yathā — as much as paṅkena — by the mud paṅka-ambhaḥ — water mixed with mud surayā — by wine vā — either surākṛtam — impurity caused by the slight touch of wine bhūta-hatyām — killing of animals tathā — like that eva — certainly ekām — one na — never yajñaiḥ — by the prescribed sacrifices mārṣṭum — to counteract arhati — is worthwhile.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā paṅkena paṅkāmbhaḥ
yathā
as much as
paṅkena
by the mud
paṅka-ambhaḥ
water mixed with mud
surayā vā surākṛtam
surayā
by wine
vā
either
surākṛtam
impurity caused by the slight touch of wine
bhūta-hatyāṁ tathaivaikāṁ
bhūta-hatyām
killing of animals
tathā
like that
eva
certainly
ekām
one
na yajñair mārṣṭum arhati
na
never
yajñaiḥ
by the prescribed sacrifices
mārṣṭum
to counteract
arhati
is worthwhile.
As it is not possible to filter muddy water through mud, or purify a wine-stained pot with wine, it is not possible to counteract the killing of men by sacrificing animals.

Aśvamedha-yajñas or gomedha-yajñas, sacrifices in which a horse or a bull is sacrificed, were not, of course, for the purpose of killing the animals. Lord Caitanya said that such animals sacrificed on the altar of yajña were rejuvenated and a new life was given to them. It was just to prove the efficacy of the hymns of the Vedas. By recitation of the hymns of the Vedas in the proper way, certainly the performer gets relief from the reactions of sins, but in case of such sacrifices improperly done under inexpert management, surely one has to become responsible for animal sacrifice. In this age of quarrel and hypocrisy there is no possibility of performing the yajñas perfectly for want of expert brāhmaṇas who are able to conduct such yajñas. Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira therefore gives a hint to performing sacrifices in the Age of Kali. In the Kali-yuga the only sacrifice recommended is the performance of hari-nāma-yajña inaugurated by Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu. But one should not indulge in animal killing and counteract it by performing the hari-nāma-yajña. Those who are devotees of the Lord never kill an animal for self-interest, and (as the Lord ordered Arjuna) they do not refrain from performing the duty of a kṣatriya. The whole purpose, therefore, is served when everything is done for the will of the Lord. This is possible only for the devotees.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the First Canto, Eighth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Prayers by Queen Kuntī and Parīkṣit Saved.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as one cannot purify muddy water by using mud, or cannot purify what is contaminated with liquor by apply more liquor, it is not possible to purify oneself of killing even one living being by performance of animal sacrifices.
Commentary

“Śruti says sarvaṁ pāpmānaṁ tarati brahmahatyāṁ yo ’śvamedhena yajate: he who performs a horse sacrifice is purified of all sins, even the sin of killing a brāhmaṇa. Therefore you can purify yourself by a horse sacrifice.”

Just as thick mud cannot purify muddy water, and an object made impure by contact with wine cannot become pure by washing it with a lot of wine, one cannot be purified of killing by the performance of many sacrifices which has intentional killing of animals as a major part.

Chapter Nine Passing of Bhīṣma

You can't filter muddy water through mud or purify wine-stained pot with wine; killing men can't be counteracted by sacrificing animals. Symbolic atonement falls short of real reckoning.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying to atone for a real wrong with a symbolic gesture?
  • What deeper change is the real repair?
📝 My note