FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

4.19 · King Pṛthu's One Hundred Horse Sacrifices

41 verses · 🖨 Class prep
I Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (15631 chars)

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) King Anga was an ideal leader, a spotless and saintly King. His son, Vena, unfortunately turned out to be the polar opposite. When the cruel boy abused his position, harassed the citizens and was egotistically absorbed in his own selfish agenda, the sages unhesitatingly killed him. From Vena’s body, however, came King Prthu, who shined forth as the emblem of ideal leadership. Prthu was divinely empowered ( saktyavesa-avatara ) with the potency to rule and protect the citizens ( palana-sakti ).

Previous External Support and Internal Mindset Next Anga’s Detachment Last updated 1 year ago

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23)

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) King Anga was an ideal leader, a spotless and saintly King. His son, Vena, unfortunately turned out to be the polar opposite. When the cruel boy abused his position, harassed the citizens and was egotistically absorbed in his own selfish agenda, the sages unhesitatingly killed him. From Vena’s body, however, came King Prthu, who shined forth as the emblem of ideal leadership. Prthu was divinely empowered ( saktyavesa-avatara ) with the potency to rule and protect the citizens ( palana-sakti ).

Previous External Support and Internal Mindset Next Anga’s Detachment Last updated 1 year ago

Anga’s Detachment

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Anga’s Detachment Chapter 13 Maitreya Rishi described the descendants of Dhruva and eventually came to King Anga. Vidura was astonished to hear about the dramatic events surrounding the King’s life, and Maitreya thus elaborated further. King Anga had no sons, but after offering suitable worship, he received a mystical pot of rice boiled in milk ( payasa ). When his wife accepted it, she became pregnant and gave birth to a son named Vena. The boy turned out to be cruel and senseless, but the King saw it as a benediction - a good son creates bonds of affection, whereas a bad son naturally helps one detach themselves from material affairs. Thus, Anga renounced his family life and left for the forest. The citizens desperately searched for him, but he was nowhere to be found, and they were thus plunged into despair.

Previous I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Next Vena Killed Last updated 1 year ago

Ideal Leadership

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Ideal Leadership Chapter 21 When Prthu returned to the kingdom after the sacrifice, the citizens offered him a grand welcome. Prthu humbly accepted their service but was more concerned about serving them. The best leaders are servants at heart. Once, Prthu initiated a great sacrifice which attracted an august and diverse assembly. He publicly declared his commitment to rule, protect and appropriately engage the citizens according to the system of Varnasrama. He sincerely encouraged everyone to give up material desires, fully embrace devotional service to the Supreme Lord, and serve the brahmanas and Vaisnavas. Prthu thus demonstrated how a real son is a putra , meaning ‘one who delivers the parents from hell.’ Just as Prahlada delivered the demoniac Hiranyakasipu, Prthu delivered the demoniac Vena.

Previous Prthu’s Horse Sacrifices Next Prthu’s Perfection Last updated 1 year ago

Leadership

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Leadership “The citizens declared that through being under the protection of Maharaja Prthu, they were directly under the protection of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This understanding is the proper situation of social steadiness within this material world. Since it is stated in the Vedas that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer and leader of all living entities, the king or the executive head of the government must be a representative of the Supreme Person. Then he can claim honour exactly like the Lord’s. How a king or leader of society can become the representative of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is also indicated in this verse by the statement that because Prthu Maharaja was preaching the supremacy and the glories of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vishnu, he was therefore a proper representative of the Lord. To remain under the jurisdiction or administration of such a king or leader is the perfect status for human society.” ( SB 4.21.49 ) In the Bhagavad-gita, Krishna famously says “Whatever actions a great man performs, and whatever standards he sets by his exemplary acts, all the world pursues” ( BG 3.21 ). Good leaders are essential for progressive civilisation. In this instructive section of Srimad-Bhagavatam, we find a series of metaphors being used to describe the qualities of Maharaja Prthu. They provide a profound insight into the content of character needed to powerfully and progressively lead people. The following verse outlines three fundamental qualities that every leader must embody: “Just as rainfall satisfies everyone’s desires, Maharaja Prthu used to satisfy everyone. He was like the sea in that no one could understand his depths, and he was like Meru, the king of hills, in the fixity of his purpose.” ( SB 4.22.58 )

Previous Prthu’s Perfection Next Selfless Last updated 1 year ago

Selfless

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Leadership Selfless Real leaders are not in it for themselves. John Hume once commented: “I never thought in terms of being a leader. I thought very simply in terms of helping people.” By their decisions, actions and words, powerful leaders inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more. Embodying true selflessness, such leaders are uninterested in personal fame and selfish gain, but are instead completely focused on bringing out the best in others. In modern terminology, they call this servant-leadership. Selfless leaders are attractive. Since they are constantly meditating on serving others, people are magnetically drawn towards them. When leaders are preoccupied with selfish thoughts and personal agendas, people are repelled. Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura once commented that spiritual institutions are a “necessary evil.” When there is organisation, facilities, structure and support, so much can be done to proliferate spirituality. There is, unfortunately, always a danger that materialistic mindsets and competition for power and prestige can creep in. Selfless leaders inspire people to become selfless followers, and as that culture perpetuates, it generates incredible vibrancy. But where leaders are selfish and exploitative, followers will naturally lose faith, trust and confidence, and will also start ‘looking out for themselves.’ Such a situation creates scepticism, stagnation and chaos in any group.

Previous Leadership Next Spiritual Last updated 1 year ago

Spiritual

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Leadership Spiritual Leaders must have spiritual depth. We read how Lord Rama, famed for his ideal reign, would often be seen speaking to sages in the seclusion of the deep forest, drawing spiritual inspiration and counsel for his progressive rulership. The powerful leaders eulogised in Srimad-Bhagavatam were known as raja- rsis , or saintly kings. They were deeply connected to the divine and learned in the philosophy of the soul. They understood the profound purpose of life and conducted their administration with the bigger picture in mind. They guided their followers to succeed on a material level and simultaneously find their spiritual essence. Spiritual leaders see themselves as instruments of God. When Srila Prabhupada was struggling alone in New York, a man named Mr Reuben questioned him on his purpose. Prabhupada explained that he had come to begin a worldwide mission to spread God consciousness. “ I am not alone ” Prabhupada reassured him, “ There are books, temples, devotees – only time separates us from them .” Equipped with the instruction of his guru and the prophecy of the Lord, Srila Prabhupada chalked out a vision to manifest what was ultimately the will of providence.

Previous Selfless Next Strong Last updated 1 year ago

Strong

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Leadership Strong While in leadership, one must have resilience. Often, we will try our best, but it won’t be good enough. A devotee once complained to Srila Prabhupada – “If the management was perfect then nobody would leave.” Prabhupada responded: “But we all left the spiritual world!” Leaders must have strength – the willingness to make bold decisions, maintain clarity under pressure, show courage in daunting situations and lead from the front. In India, ksatriya kings are still called singh , which means ‘lion.’ We should note that strong doesn’t mean insensitive. Lord Rama, for example, employed spies who would tour the country to gauge how people felt about him. Based on the feedback He would introspect and try to improve His rule. Nowadays, modern leaders have spies to protect their position, power and prestige. Strength needs to be tempered with morality – knowing the difference between right and wrong, being sensitive to human feelings and showing maturity and consideration of the ramifications of each decision.

Previous Spiritual Next P – Pracinabarhisat, Pracetas and Puranjana (24-31) Last updated 1 year ago

Prthu and Mother Earth

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Prthu and Mother Earth Chapter 17, 18 After Prthu was enthroned there was a scarcity of food grains and the starving citizens pleaded for help. When Prthu discovered that Mother Earth was not producing sufficient grains, he angrily set out to chastise her. Mother Earth took the form of a cow and fled, begging Prthu to spare her and offering a variety of arguments to convince him. Prthu angrily countered her arguments, explaining that since she had disobeyed his orders, death was the fitting punishment. Mother Earth then surrendered herself and submitted an appeal. She explained that the insufficient supply of grains was caused by the consumption of non-devotees and the fact that nobody was maintaining her. At her request, Prthu transformed Svayambhuva Manu into a calf, after whom many great personalities also became calves. They all received gifts from Mother Earth, and Prthu then decided to flatten the earth. He expertly structured the cities and villages, demonstrating great care and concern for his dependents.

Previous Prthu’s Appearance Next Prthu’s Horse Sacrifices Last updated 1 year ago

Prthu’s Appearance

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Prthu’s Appearance Chapter 14, 15, 16 The sages were now faced with the same problem – an uprising of thieves and the precarious situation of a world with no ruler. Desiring the appearance of a suitable king, the sages churned Vena’s thighs. A humble dwarf-like entity named Bahuka appeared, who assumed all of Vena’s sinful activities. Having separated the impure portion of Vena, the sages proceeded to churn his two arms, and a male and female duly appeared. The male was a saktyavesa-avatara (Prthu), and the female was a plenary expansion of the Goddess of Fortune (Arci). Maharaja Prthu, who would become the emblem of ideal leadership, had appeared to protect the citizens and was subsequently coronated. The demigods presented him with wonderful gifts and the assembly glorified him with choice poetry. Hearing himself being praised, Prthu humbly submitted that he had not yet displayed such character and was concerned their words don’t go in vain. Despite Prthu’s humble protests, the bards continued to commend his saintly character and leadership qualities, knowing him to be a specially empowered incarnation of the Lord. They thus predicted the prosperity and happiness that his reign would bring.

Previous Vena Killed Next Prthu and Mother Earth Last updated 1 year ago

Prthu’s Horse Sacrifices

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Prthu’s Horse Sacrifices Chapters 19, 20 When Prthu initiated one hundred horse sacrifices to reaffirm his unrivalled sovereignty, Indra invariably felt threatened. Afflicted with envy, Indra disguised himself as a renunciate and deviously stole the final horse in the sacrifice. Atri Muni informed Prthu’s son, who chased Indra with a plan to kill him. When he saw Indra in the garb of a sannyasi , however, he refrained from attacking. Atri again ordered Prthu’s son to pursue Indra and kill him. Seeing Prthu’s son for the second time, the frightened Indra abandoned his dress as well as the horse. Prthu’s son, who duly received the name Vijitasva, thus brought the hundredth horse back. Indra decided to steal the horse again, and Vijitasva chased him for the third time. Seeing Indra as a sannyasi , Vijitasva again hesitated to kill him. Spurred on by Atri Muni, Vijitasva did indeed pursue Indra, who eventually gave up his false garb and the hundredth horse. Having discredited the sannyasa dress, Prthu set out to kill Indra, while the priests suggested killing him in the sacrificial altar. Brahma reassured Prthu that his completion of the 100 horse sacrifices was unnecessary. Instead, he reminded Prthu of the purpose of his appearance and urged him to reinstate dharma . Satisfied with Prthu’s sacrifice, Vishnu appeared on the scene and told the King to forgive Indra, saying that as a devotee, Prthu should not be affected by such worldly intrigues. Vishnu instructed Prthu in the ideal qualities of a king, and how he should rule the kingdom for the prosperity of all citizens. With deep gratitude, Prthu offered beautiful prayers to the Lord.

Previous Prthu and Mother Earth Next Ideal Leadership Last updated 1 year ago

Prthu’s Perfection

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Prthu’s Perfection Chapter 22, 23 When the Four Kumaras arrived in the kingdom, Prthu enthusiastically welcomed them, offered respects and appreciated the golden opportunity to serve them. The arrival of saintly persons is a rare benediction for householders. When Prthu enquired about the fate of those who are materially entangled, a wonderful discussion ensued in which the Kumaras contrasted the nature of material and spiritual attachment. Prthu displayed glorious leadership, and Maitreya described his outstanding qualities using a variety of outstanding metaphors. As Maharaja Prthu aged, he divided his wealth, entrusted the kingdom to his sons and left for the forest to perform severe austerity. He controlled his mind and senses through steady devotional service, renounced all material desires and gained a meditation of the Lord within ( paramatma realisation). In the final stages of his life, Prthu raised his life airs with his yogic power and left the body in a glorious manner. Arci, who had followed her husband to the forest, displayed her remarkable chastity. She arranged his funeral pyre, set it alight and then personally entered it without any hesitation.

Previous Ideal Leadership Next Leadership Last updated 1 year ago

Vena Killed

I - Ideal Leadership (13-23) Vena Killed Chapter 14 The sages feared that thieves and rogues would run rampant in the absence of a monarch, and thus, despite the protests of the ministers, they installed Vena as the king. After being enthroned, the power lent to Vena amplified the arrogance and pride within him, such that he insulted great personalities and stopped all religious sacrifices. The sages tried to correct the King with pleasing words, encouraging him to honour religious principles and accrue the benefits of righteous ruling, but Vena rejected their proposals outright. When he declared himself supreme, the outraged sages saw no other recourse and killed him by the power of their words. Feeling distraught at the death of her son, Sunitha decided to preserve Vena’s body.

Previous Anga’s Detachment Next Prthu’s Appearance Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.1

↗
मैत्रेय उवाच अथादीक्षत राजा तु हयमेधशतेन स: । ब्रह्मावर्ते मनो: क्षेत्रे यत्र प्राची सरस्वती ॥ १ ॥
maitreya uvāca
[maitreya uvaacha]
athādīkṣata rājā tu
[athaadeekshata raajaa tu]
hayamedha-śatena saḥ
[hayamedha-shatena sah]
brahmāvarte manoḥ kṣetre
[brahmaavarte manoh kshetre]
yatra prācī sarasvatī
[yatra praachee sarasvatee]
maitreyaḥ uvāca — the sage Maitreya said atha — thereafter adīkṣata — took initiation rājā — the King tu — then haya — horse medha — sacrifices śatena — to perform one hundred saḥ — he brahmāvarte — known as Brahmāvarta manoḥ — of Svāyambhuva Manu kṣetre — in the land yatra — where prācī — eastern sarasvatī — the river named Sarasvatī.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maitreya uvāca
maitreyaḥ uvāca
the sage Maitreya said
athādīkṣata rājā tu
atha
thereafter
adīkṣata
took initiation
rājā
the King
tu
then
hayamedha-śatena saḥ
haya
horse
medha
sacrifices
śatena
to perform one hundred
saḥ
he
brahmāvarte manoḥ kṣetre
brahmāvarte
known as Brahmāvarta
manoḥ
of Svāyambhuva Manu
kṣetre
in the land
yatra prācī sarasvatī
yatra
where
prācī
eastern
sarasvatī
the river named Sarasvatī.
The great sage Maitreya continued: My dear Vidura, King Pṛthu initiated the performance of one hundred horse sacrifices at the spot where the river Sarasvatī flows towards the east. This piece of land is known as Brahmāvarta, and it was controlled by Svāyambhuva Manu.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Maitreya said: At Manu’s place called Brahmāvarta where the Sarasvatī River turns east, Pṛthu prepared to perform a hundred horse sacrifices. The Nineteenth Chapter describes how Indra, stealing the sacrificial horse, created heretics, and how Brahmā stopped the priests from killing him. The place made by the devatās between the Sarasvatī and Dṛśadvatī Rivers is called Brahmāvarta. Haya-medha-śatena means “for the purpose of performing a hundred horse sacrifices.”
Pṛthu began a hundred horse-sacrifices in Brahmāvarta where Sarasvatī flows east. Great undertakings require the right place; sacred geography supports sacred work.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'right place' am I ignoring as I attempt large work?
  • Where would moving an activity to a sanctified location change its quality?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.2

↗
तदभिप्रेत्य भगवान् कर्मातिशयमात्मन: । शतक्रतुर्न ममृषे पृथोर्यज्ञमहोत्सवम् ॥ २ ॥
tad abhipretya bhagavān
[tad abhipretya bhagavaan]
karmātiśayam ātmanaḥ
[karmaatishayam aatmanah]
śata-kratur na mamṛṣe
[shata-kratur na mamrishe]
pṛthor yajña-mahotsavam
[prithor yajna-mahotsavam]
tat abhipretya — considering this matter bhagavān — the most powerful karma-atiśayam — excelling in fruitive activities ātmanaḥ — of himself śata-kratuḥ — King Indra, who had performed a hundred sacrifices na — not mamṛṣe — did tolerate pṛthoḥ — of King Pṛthu yajña — sacrificial mahā-utsavam — great ceremonies.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad abhipretya bhagavān
tat abhipretya
considering this matter
bhagavān
the most powerful
karmātiśayam ātmanaḥ
karma-atiśayam
excelling in fruitive activities
ātmanaḥ
of himself
śata-kratuḥ
King Indra, who had performed a hundred sacrifices
na
not
śata-kratur na mamṛṣe
mamṛṣe
did tolerate
pṛthor yajña-mahotsavam
pṛthoḥ
of King Pṛthu
yajña
sacrificial
mahā-utsavam
great ceremonies.
When the most powerful Indra, the King of heaven, saw this, he considered the fact that King Pṛthu was going to exceed him in fruitive activities. Thus Indra could not tolerate the great sacrificial ceremonies performed by King Pṛthu.

In the material world everyone who comes to enjoy himself or lord it over material nature is envious of others. This envy is also found in the personality of the King of heaven, Indra. As evident from revealed scriptures, Indra was several times envious of many persons. He was especially envious of great fruitive activities and the execution of yoga practices, or siddhis. Indeed, he could not tolerate them, and he desired to break them up. He was envious due to fear that those who performed great sacrifices for the execution of mystic yoga might occupy his seat. Since no one in this material world can tolerate another’s advancement, everyone in the material world is called matsara, envious. In the beginning of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam it is therefore said that Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is meant for those who are completely nirmatsara (nonenvious). In other words, one who is not free from the contamination of envy cannot advance in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. In Kṛṣṇa consciousness, however, if someone excels another person, the devotee who is excelled thinks how fortunate the other person is to be advancing in devotional service. Such nonenvy is typical of Vaikuṇṭha. However, when one is envious of his competitor, that is material. The demigods posted in the material world are not exempt from envy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thinking that Pṛthu would excel him, Indra could not tolerate the great sacrifice of Pṛthu. Ātmanaḥ means “more than him.”
Seeing Pṛthu's success, Indra grew envious — even the king of heaven can't tolerate someone surpassing him. Envy doesn't disappear at high altitude; it follows promotion.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose success have I begrudged from a position I thought was beyond envy?
  • Where am I expecting senior people to be above envy when they may simply be more sophisticated about hiding it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.3

↗
यत्र यज्ञपति: साक्षाद्भगवान् हरिरीश्वर: । अन्वभूयत सर्वात्मा सर्वलोकगुरु: प्रभु: ॥ ३ ॥
yatra yajña-patiḥ sākṣād
[yatra yajna-patih saakshaad]
bhagavān harir īśvaraḥ
[bhagavaan harir eeshvarah]
anvabhūyata sarvātmā
[anvabhooyata sarvaatmaa]
sarva-loka-guruḥ prabhuḥ
[sarva-loka-guruh prabhuh]
yatra — where yajña-patiḥ — the enjoyer of all sacrifices sākṣāt — directly bhagavān — the Supreme Personality of Godhead hariḥ — Lord Viṣṇu īśvaraḥ — the supreme controller anvabhūyata — became visible sarva-ātmā — the Supersoul of everyone sarva-loka-guruḥ — the master of all planets, or the teacher of everyone prabhuḥ — the proprietor.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yatra yajña-patiḥ sākṣād
yatra
where
yajña-patiḥ
the enjoyer of all sacrifices
sākṣāt
directly
bhagavān harir īśvaraḥ
bhagavān
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
hariḥ
Lord Viṣṇu
īśvaraḥ
the supreme controller
anvabhūyata sarvātmā
anvabhūyata
became visible
sarva-ātmā
the Supersoul of everyone
sarva-loka-guruḥ prabhuḥ
sarva-loka-guruḥ
the master of all planets, or the teacher of everyone
prabhuḥ
the proprietor.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Viṣṇu, is present in everyone’s heart as the Supersoul, and He is the proprietor of all planets and the enjoyer of the results of all sacrifices. He was personally present at the sacrifices made by King Pṛthu.

In this verse the word sākṣāt is significant. Pṛthu Mahārāja was a śaktyāveśa-avatāra incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu. Actually Pṛthu Mahārāja was a living entity, but he acquired specific powers from Lord Viṣṇu. Lord Viṣṇu, however, is directly the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and thus belongs to the category of viṣṇu-tattva. Mahārāja Pṛthu belonged to the jīva-tattva. The viṣṇu-tattva indicates God, whereas the jīva-tattva indicates the part and parcel of God. When God’s part and parcel is especially empowered, he is called śaktyāveśa-avatāra. Lord Viṣṇu is herein described as harir īśvaraḥ. The Lord is so kind that He takes all miserable conditions away from His devotees. Consequently He is called Hari. He is described as īśvara because He can do whatever He likes. He is the supreme controller. The supreme īśvara puruṣottama is Lord Kṛṣṇa. He exhibits His powers as īśvara, or the supreme controller, when He assures His devotee in Bhagavad-gītā (18.66) : “Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reaction. Do not fear.” He can immediately make His devotee immune from all the reactions caused by sinful life if the devotee simply surrenders unto Him. He is described herein as sarvātmā, meaning that He is present in everyone’s heart as the Supersoul, and as such He is the supreme teacher of everyone. If we are fortunate enough to take the lessons given by Lord Kṛṣṇa in Bhagavad-gītā, our lives immediately become successful. No one can give better instructions to human society than Lord Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In that sacrifice, the master of sacrifice, the Supreme Lord, the soul of all beings, the guru for the whole universe, Viṣṇu, personally appeared. Seven verses show how he surpassed Indra in execution of karma.
Lord Viṣṇu Himself attended Pṛthu's sacrifices — Supersoul of all, enjoyer of all yajñas. When the work is properly directed, the chief recipient shows up personally.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose presence at my work would confirm it's correctly directed?
  • Where am I doing yajña without inviting the chief recipient?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.4

↗
अन्वितो ब्रह्मशर्वाभ्यां लोकपालै: सहानुगै: । उपगीयमानो गन्धर्वैर्मुनिभिश्चाप्सरोगणै: ॥ ४ ॥
anvito brahma-śarvābhyāṁ
[anvito brahma-sharvaabhyaam]
loka-pālaiḥ sahānugaiḥ
[loka-paalaih sahaanugaih]
upagīyamāno gandharvair
[upageeyamaano gandharvair]
munibhiś cāpsaro-gaṇaiḥ
[munibhish chaapsaro-ganaih]
anvitaḥ — being accompanied brahma — by Lord Brahmā śarvābhyām — and by Lord Śiva loka-pālaiḥ — by the predominating chiefs of all different planets saha anugaiḥ — along with their followers upagīyamānaḥ — being praised gandharvaiḥ — by the residents of Gandharvaloka munibhiḥ — by great sages ca — also apsaraḥ-gaṇaiḥ — by the residents of Apsaroloka.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
anvito brahma-śarvābhyāṁ
anvitaḥ
being accompanied
brahma
by Lord Brahmā
śarvābhyām
and by Lord Śiva
loka-pālaiḥ sahānugaiḥ
loka-pālaiḥ
by the predominating chiefs of all different planets
saha anugaiḥ
along with their followers
upagīyamāno gandharvair
upagīyamānaḥ
being praised
gandharvaiḥ
by the residents of Gandharvaloka
munibhiś cāpsaro-gaṇaiḥ
munibhiḥ
by great sages
ca
also
apsaraḥ-gaṇaiḥ
by the residents of Apsaroloka.
When Lord Viṣṇu appeared in the sacrificial arena, Lord Brahmā, Lord Śiva and all the chief predominating personalities of every planet, as well as their followers, came with Him. When He appeared on the scene, the residents of Gandharvaloka, the great sages, and the residents of Apsaroloka all praised Him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord, accompanied by Brahmā and Śiva, as well as the other devatās and their followers, was praised by the Gandharvas, Apsarās and sages.
With Viṣṇu came Brahmā, Śiva, and the rulers of every planet; gandharvas and sages praised Him. When the principal arrives, the whole network of authorities follows.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I attending to one important person while ignoring the train of associated dignitaries?
  • Whose retinue have I missed at an event I attended?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.5

↗
सिद्धा विद्याधरा दैत्या दानवा गुह्यकादय: । सुनन्दनन्दप्रमुखा: पार्षदप्रवरा हरे: ॥ ५ ॥
siddhā vidyādharā daityā
[siddhaa vidyaadharaa daityaa]
dānavā guhyakādayaḥ
[daanavaa guhyakaadayah]
sunanda-nanda-pramukhāḥ
[sunanda-nanda-pramukhaah]
pārṣada-pravarā hareḥ
[paarshada-pravaraa hareh]
siddhāḥ — the residents of Siddhaloka vidyādharāḥ — the residents of Vidyādhara-loka daityāḥ — the demoniac descendants of Diti dānavāḥ — the asuras guhyaka-ādayaḥ — the Yakṣas, etc. sunanda-nanda-pramukhāḥ — headed by Sunanda and Nanda, the chief of Lord Viṣṇu’s associates from Vaikuṇṭha pārṣada — associates pravarāḥ — most respectful hareḥ — of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
siddhā vidyādharā daityā
siddhāḥ
the residents of Siddhaloka
vidyādharāḥ
the residents of Vidyādhara-loka
daityāḥ
the demoniac descendants of Diti
dānavā guhyakādayaḥ
dānavāḥ
the asuras
guhyaka-ādayaḥ
the Yakṣas, etc.
sunanda-nanda-pramukhāḥ
sunanda-nanda-pramukhāḥ
headed by Sunanda and Nanda, the chief of Lord Viṣṇu’s associates from Vaikuṇṭha
pārṣada-pravarā hareḥ
pārṣada
associates
pravarāḥ
most respectful
hareḥ
of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
The Lord was accompanied by the residents of Siddhaloka and Vidyādhara-loka, all the descendants of Diti, and the demons and the Yakṣas. He was also accompanied by His chief associates, headed by Sunanda and Nanda.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Siddhas, Vidyādharas, Daityas, Dānavas, Yakṣas, Sunanda and Nanda, who were the Lord’s chief associates, Kapila, Nārada, Dattātreya, masters of yoga, and the Kumāras, who were all great devotees eager for service, followed the Lord.
Siddhas, Vidyādharas, descendants of Diti, demons, Yakṣas — even rivals came with Him, led by Nanda and Sunanda. Sacred occasions briefly suspend the hostility lines; all factions can show up.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose presence as 'opposition' at my sacred occasions could I welcome?
  • Where do I miss the chance for cross-faction reconciliation that the right gathering would enable?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.6

↗
कपिलो नारदो दत्तो योगेशा: सनकादय: । तमन्वीयुर्भागवता ये च तत्सेवनोत्सुका: ॥ ६ ॥
kapilo nārado datto
[kapilo naarado datto]
yogeśāḥ sanakādayaḥ
[yogeshaah sanakaadayah]
tam anvīyur bhāgavatā
[tam anveeyur bhaagavataa]
ye ca tat-sevanotsukāḥ
[ye cha tat-sevanotsukaah]
kapilaḥ — Kapila Muni nāradaḥ — the great sage Nārada dattaḥ — Dattātreya yoga-īśāḥ — the masters of mystic power sanaka-ādayaḥ — headed by Sanaka tam — Lord Viṣṇu anvīyuḥ — followed bhāgavatāḥ — great devotees ye — all those who ca — also tat-sevana-utsukāḥ — always eager to serve the Lord.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kapilo nārado datto
kapilaḥ
Kapila Muni
nāradaḥ
the great sage Nārada
dattaḥ
Dattātreya
yogeśāḥ sanakādayaḥ
yoga-īśāḥ
the masters of mystic power
sanaka-ādayaḥ
headed by Sanaka
tam anvīyur bhāgavatā
tam
Lord Viṣṇu
anvīyuḥ
followed
bhāgavatāḥ
great devotees
ye ca tat-sevanotsukāḥ
ye
all those who
ca
also
tat-sevana-utsukāḥ
always eager to serve the Lord.
Great devotees, who were always engaged in the service of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as well as the great sages named Kapila, Nārada and Dattātreya, and masters of mystic powers, headed by Sanaka Kumāra, all attended the great sacrifice with Lord Viṣṇu.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Siddhas, Vidyādharas, Daityas, Dānavas, Yakṣas, Sunanda and Nanda, who were the Lord’s chief associates, Kapila, Nārada, Dattātreya, masters of yoga, and the Kumāras, who were all great devotees eager for service, followed the Lord.
Kapila, Nārada, Dattātreya, the Kumāras — the masters of mystic powers — all attended. Real work draws the rarely-attending; presence of the genuinely great validates the form.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'rarely-attending' figure in my circle would I want at my next significant event?
  • What would the presence of true mystics in my domain look like, practically?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.7

↗
यत्र धर्मदुघा भूमि: सर्वकामदुघा सती । दोग्धि स्माभीप्सितानर्थान् यजमानस्य भारत ॥ ७ ॥
yatra dharma-dughā bhūmiḥ
[yatra dharma-dughaa bhoomih]
sarva-kāma-dughā satī
[sarva-kaama-dughaa satee]
dogdhi smābhīpsitān arthān
[dogdhi smaabheepsitaan arthaan]
yajamānasya bhārata
[yajamaanasya bhaarata]
yatra — where dharma-dughā — producing sufficient milk for religiosity bhūmiḥ — the land sarva-kāma — all desires dughā — yielding as milk satī — the cow dogdhi sma — fulfilled abhīpsitān — desirable arthān — objects yajamānasya — of the sacrificer bhārata — my dear Vidura.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yatra dharma-dughā bhūmiḥ
yatra
where
dharma-dughā
producing sufficient milk for religiosity
bhūmiḥ
the land
sarva-kāma-dughā satī
sarva-kāma
all desires
dughā
yielding as milk
satī
the cow
dogdhi smābhīpsitān arthān
dogdhi sma
fulfilled
abhīpsitān
desirable
arthān
objects
yajamānasya bhārata
yajamānasya
of the sacrificer
bhārata
my dear Vidura.
My dear Vidura, in that great sacrifice the entire land came to be like the milk-producing kāma-dhenu, and thus, by the performance of yajña, all daily necessities for life were supplied.

In this verse the word dharma-dughā is significant, for it indicates kāma-dhenu. Kāma-dhenu is also known as surabhi. Surabhi cows inhabit the spiritual world, and, as stated in Brahma-saṁhitā, Lord Kṛṣṇa is engaged in tending these cows: surabhīr abhipālayantam. One can milk a surabhi cow as often as one likes, and the cow will deliver as much milk as one requires. Milk, of course, is necessary for the production of so many milk products, especially clarified butter, which is required for the performance of great sacrifices. Unless we are prepared to perform the prescribed sacrifices, our supply of the necessities of life will be checked. Bhagavad-gītā confirms that Lord Brahmā created human society along with yajña, the performance of sacrifice. Yajña means Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and sacrifice means working for the satisfaction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In this age, however, it is very difficult to find qualified brāhmaṇas who can perform sacrifices as prescribed in the Vedas. Therefore it is recommended in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ( yajñaiḥ saṅkīrtana-prāyaiḥ ) that by performing saṅkīrtana-yajña and by satisfying the yajña-puruṣa, Lord Caitanya, one can derive all the results derived by great sacrifices in the past. King Pṛthu and others derived all the necessities of life from the earthly planet by performing great sacrifices. Now this saṅkīrtana movement has already been started by the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. People should take advantage of this great sacrifice and join in the Society’s activities; then there will be no scarcity. If saṅkīrtana-yajña is performed, there will be no difficulty, not even in industrial enterprises. Therefore this system should be introduced in all spheres of life — social, political, industrial, commercial, etc. Then everything will run very peacefully and smoothly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! At that sacrifice, the pure earth, yielding all desirable things, yielding dharma, offered all desired objects to Pṛthu.
The whole land became like kāma-dhenu, supplying daily necessities by yajña. Sacrifice doesn't just produce spiritual fruit; the land itself becomes wish-fulfilling.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I imagine yajña and provision as separate when they are actually one system?
  • What does it mean that my consumption is part of a sacrificial economy?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.8

↗
ऊहु: सर्वरसान्नद्य: क्षीरदध्यन्नगोरसान् । तरवो भूरिवर्ष्माण: प्रासूयन्त मधुच्युत: ॥ ८ ॥
ūhuḥ sarva-rasān nadyaḥ
[oohuh sarva-rasaan nadyah]
kṣīra-dadhy-anna-go-rasān
[ksheera-dadhy-anna-go-rasaan]
taravo bhūri-varṣmāṇaḥ
[taravo bhoori-varshmaanah]
prāsūyanta madhu-cyutaḥ
[praasooyanta madhu-chyutah]
ūhuḥ — bore sarva-rasān — all kinds of tastes nadyaḥ — the rivers kṣīra — milk dadhi — curd anna — different kinds of food go-rasān — other milk products taravaḥ — trees bhūri — great varṣmāṇaḥ — having bodies prāsūyanta — bore fruit madhu-cyutaḥ — dropping honey.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ūhuḥ sarva-rasān nadyaḥ
ūhuḥ
bore
sarva-rasān
all kinds of tastes
nadyaḥ
the rivers
kṣīra-dadhy-anna-go-rasān
kṣīra
milk
dadhi
curd
anna
different kinds of food
go-rasān
other milk products
taravo bhūri-varṣmāṇaḥ
taravaḥ
trees
bhūri
great
varṣmāṇaḥ
having bodies
prāsūyanta madhu-cyutaḥ
prāsūyanta
bore fruit
madhu-cyutaḥ
dropping honey.
The flowing rivers supplied all kinds of tastes — sweet, pungent, sour, etc. — and very big trees supplied fruit and honey in abundance. The cows, having eaten sufficient green grass, supplied profuse quantities of milk, curd, clarified butter and similar other necessities.

If rivers are not polluted and are allowed to flow in their own way, or sometimes allowed to flood the land, the land will become very fertile and able to produce all kinds of vegetables, trees and plants. The word rasa means “taste.” Actually all rasas are tastes within the earth, and as soon as seeds are sown in the ground, various trees sprout up to satisfy our different tastes. For instance, sugarcane provides its juices to satisfy our taste for sweetness, and oranges provide their juices to satisfy our taste for a mixture of the sour and the sweet. Similarly, there are pineapples and other fruits. At the same time, there are chilies to satisfy our taste for pungency. Although the earth’s ground is the same, different tastes arise due to different kinds of seeds. As Kṛṣṇa says in Bhagavad-gītā (7.10) , bījaṁ māṁ sarva-bhūtānām: “I am the original seed of all existences.” Therefore all arrangements are there. And as stated in Īśopaniṣad, pūrṇam idam: complete arrangements for the production of all the necessities of life are made by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. People should therefore learn how to satisfy the yajña-puruṣa, Lord Viṣṇu. Indeed, the living entity’s prime business is to satisfy the Lord because the living entity is part and parcel of the Lord. Thus the whole system is so arranged that the living entity must do his duty as he is constitutionally made. Without doing so, all living entities must suffer. That is the law of nature.

The words taravo bhūri-varṣmāṇaḥ indicate very luxuriantly grown, big-bodied trees. The purpose of these trees was to produce honey and varieties of fruit. In other words, the forest also has its purpose in supplying honey, fruits and flowers. Unfortunately in Kali-yuga, due to an absence of yajña, there are many big trees in the forests, but they do not supply sufficient fruits and honey. Thus everything is dependent on the performance of yajña. The best way to perform yajña in this age is to spread the saṅkīrtana movement all over the world.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The rivers flowed with all saps, yogurt, milk, and foods. The tall trees, dropping honey, produced fruit. Bhūri-varṣmāṇaḥ means very big. Amara-koṣa says varṣma means body and size. Those trees, dropping honey, produced fruit.
Rivers carried different tastes; trees gave fruit and honey; cows abundant milk, curd and ghee. Properly aligned natural systems give abundance with variety; degraded ones give scarcity and uniformity.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my surroundings has natural variety dwindled — and what's the underlying degradation?
  • How could I support river-and-tree systems that are still trying to feed us?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.9

↗
सिन्धवो रत्ननिकरान् गिरयोऽन्नं चतुर्विधम् । उपायनमुपाजह्रु: सर्वे लोका: सपालका: ॥ ९ ॥
sindhavo ratna-nikarān
[sindhavo ratna-nikaraan]
girayo ’nnaṁ catur-vidham
[girayo ’nnam chatur-vidham]
upāyanam upājahruḥ
[upaayanam upaajahruh]
sarve lokāḥ sa-pālakāḥ
[sarve lokaah sa-paalakaah]
sindhavaḥ — the oceans ratna-nikarān — heaps of jewels girayaḥ — the hills annam — eatables catuḥ-vidham — four kinds of upāyanam — presentations upājahruḥ — brought forward sarve — all lokāḥ — the people in general of all planets sa-pālakāḥ — along with the governors.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sindhavo ratna-nikarān
sindhavaḥ
the oceans
ratna-nikarān
heaps of jewels
girayo ’nnaṁ catur-vidham
girayaḥ
the hills
upāyanam upājahruḥ
annam
eatables
catuḥ-vidham
four kinds of
upāyanam
presentations
upājahruḥ
brought forward
sarve lokāḥ sa-pālakāḥ
sarve
all
lokāḥ
the people in general of all planets
sa-pālakāḥ
along with the governors.
King Pṛthu was presented with various gifts from the general populace and predominating deities of all planets. The oceans and seas were full of valuable jewels and pearls, and the hills were full of chemicals and fertilizers. Four kinds of edibles were produced profusely.

As stated in Īśopaniṣad, this material creation is supplied with all the potencies for the production of all necessities required by the living entities — not only human beings, but animals, reptiles, aquatics and trees. The oceans and seas produce pearls, coral and valuable jewels so that fortunate law-abiding people can utilize them. Similarly, the hills are full of chemicals so that when rivers flow down from them the chemicals spread over the fields to fertilize the four kinds of foodstuffs. These are technically known as carvya (those edibles which are chewed), lehya (those which are licked up), cūṣya (those which are swallowed) and peya (those which are drunk).

Pṛthu Mahārāja was greeted by the residents of other planets and their presiding deities. They presented various gifts to the King and acknowledged him as the proper type of king by whose planning and activities everyone throughout the universe could be happy and prosperous. It is clearly indicated in this verse that the oceans and seas are meant for producing jewels, but in Kali-yuga the oceans are mainly being utilized for fishing. Śūdras and poor men were allowed to fish, but the higher classes like the kṣatriyas and vaiśyas would gather pearls, jewels and coral. Although poor men would catch tons of fish, they would not be equal in value to one piece of coral or pearl. In this age so many factories for the manufacture of fertilizers have been opened, but when the Personality of Godhead is pleased by the performance of yajñas, the hills automatically produce fertilizing chemicals, which help produce edibles in the fields. Everything is dependent on the people’s acceptance of the Vedic principles of sacrifice.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The oceans offered heaps of jewels, mountains offered four kinds of food and all the planets and their lords offered gifts.
Citizens and deities brought gifts: oceans gave pearls, hills gave chemicals and fertilizers, four kinds of food were produced in plenty. The earth contains everything a being could need; the system is provision-rich when honored.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I treating provision as scarce when the system is actually overflowing?
  • What gifts from 'oceans and hills' am I underusing in my own life?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.10

↗
इति चाधोक्षजेशस्य पृथोस्तु परमोदयम् । असूयन् भगवानिन्द्र: प्रतिघातमचीकरत् ॥ १० ॥
iti cādhokṣajeśasya
[iti chaadhokshajeshasya]
pṛthos tu paramodayam
[prithos tu paramodayam]
asūyan bhagavān indraḥ
[asooyan bhagavaan indrah]
pratighātam acīkarat
[pratighaatam acheekarat]
iti — thus ca — also adhokṣaja-īśasya — who accepted Adhokṣaja as his worshipable Lord pṛthoḥ — of King Pṛthu tu — then parama — the topmost udayam — opulence asūyan — being envious of bhagavān — the most powerful indraḥ — the King of heaven pratighātam — impediments acīkarat — made.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti cādhokṣajeśasya
iti
thus
ca
also
adhokṣaja-īśasya
who accepted Adhokṣaja as his worshipable Lord
pṛthos tu paramodayam
pṛthoḥ
of King Pṛthu
tu
then
parama
the topmost
udayam
opulence
asūyan bhagavān indraḥ
asūyan
being envious of
bhagavān
the most powerful
indraḥ
the King of heaven
pratighātam acīkarat
pratighātam
impediments
acīkarat
made.
King Pṛthu was dependent on the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is known as Adhokṣaja. Because King Pṛthu performed so many sacrifices, he was superhumanly enhanced by the mercy of the Supreme Lord. King Pṛthu’s opulence, however, could not be tolerated by the King of heaven, Indra, who tried to impede the progress of his opulence.

In this verse there are three significant purposes expressed in the words adhokṣaja, bhagavān indraḥ and pṛthoḥ. Mahārāja Pṛthu is an incarnation of Viṣṇu, yet he is a great devotee of Lord Viṣṇu. Although an empowered incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu, he is nonetheless a living entity. As such, he must be a devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Although one is empowered by the Supreme Personality of Godhead and is an incarnation, he should not forget his eternal relationship with the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In Kali-yuga there are many self-made incarnations, rascals, who declare themselves to be the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The words bhagavān indraḥ indicate that a living entity can even be as exalted and powerful as King Indra, for even King Indra is an ordinary living entity in the material world and possesses the four defects of the conditioned soul. King Indra is described herein as bhagavān, which is generally used in reference to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In this case, however, King Indra is addressed as bhagavān because he has so much power in his hands. Despite his becoming bhagavān, he is envious of the incarnation of God, Pṛthu Mahārāja. The defects of material life are so strong that due to contamination King Indra becomes envious of an incarnation of God.

We should try to understand, therefore, how a conditioned soul becomes fallen. The opulence of King Pṛthu was not dependent on material conditions. As described in this verse, he was a great devotee of Adhokṣaja. The word adhokṣaja indicates the Personality of Godhead, who is beyond the expression of mind and words. However, the Supreme Personality of Godhead appears before the devotee in His original form of eternal bliss and knowledge. The devotee is allowed to see the Supreme Lord face to face, although the Lord is beyond the expression of our senses and beyond our direct perception.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Envious of the high prosperity of Pṛthu, who was the Supreme Lord, Indra obstructed the sacrifice. Instead of prṭhos tu the words pṛthos tad is sometimes seen.
Pṛthu depended on the Lord (Adhokṣaja) and became super-empowered by His mercy; this opulence Indra could not tolerate. Dependence on the Lord produces an effect that envy cannot match.
Reflection Questions
  • Where would full dependence on the Lord generate something my own striving hasn't?
  • Whose intolerance toward me may be evidence that something is actually working?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.11

↗
चरमेणाश्वमेधेन यजमाने यजुष्पतिम् । वैन्ये यज्ञपशुं स्पर्धन्नपोवाह तिरोहित: ॥ ११ ॥
carameṇāśvamedhena
[charamenaashvamedhena]
yajamāne yajuṣ-patim
[yajamaane yajush-patim]
vainye yajña-paśuṁ spardhann
[vainye yajna-pashum spardhann]
apovāha tirohitaḥ
[apovaaha tirohitah]
carameṇa — by the last one aśva-medhena — by the aśvamedha sacrifice yajamāne — when he was performing the sacrifice yajuḥ-patim — for satisfaction of the Lord of yajña, Viṣṇu vainye — the son of King Vena yajña-paśum — the animal meant to be sacrificed in the yajña spardhan — being envious apovāha — stole tirohitaḥ — being invisible.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
carameṇāśvamedhena
carameṇa
by the last one
aśva-medhena
by the aśvamedha sacrifice
yajamāne yajuṣ-patim
yajamāne
when he was performing the sacrifice
yajuḥ-patim
for satisfaction of the Lord of yajña, Viṣṇu
vainye yajña-paśuṁ spardhann
vainye
the son of King Vena
yajña-paśum
the animal meant to be sacrificed in the yajña
spardhan
being envious
apovāha tirohitaḥ
apovāha
stole
tirohitaḥ
being invisible.
When Pṛthu Mahārāja was performing the last horse sacrifice [aśvamedha-yajña], King Indra, invisible to everyone, stole the horse intended for sacrifice. He did this because of his great envy of King Pṛthu.

King Indra is known as śata-kratu, which indicates that he has performed one hundred horse sacrifices ( aśvamedha-yajña ). We should know, however, that the animals sacrificed in the yajña were not killed. If the Vedic mantras were properly pronounced during the sacrifice, the animal sacrificed would come out again with a new life. That is the test for a successful yajña. When King Pṛthu was performing one hundred yajñas, Indra became very envious because he did not want anyone to excel him. Being an ordinary living entity, he became envious of King Pṛthu, and, making himself invisible, he stole the horse and thus impeded the yajña performance.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Pṛthu was worshipping Viṣṇu with the last horse sacrifice, envious Indra with an invisible form stole the horse. Yajuḥpatim means Viṣṇu. Apovāha means “he stole.”
During the last sacrifice, Indra invisibly stole the sacrificial horse out of envy. The 'last 1%' of a long sacrifice is often when the most envious opposition strikes; defend it specifically.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'last horse' of mine has been stolen out of competitive envy at the finish line?
  • Where do I need to specifically defend the closing of a long project?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.12

↗
तमत्रिर्भगवानैक्षत्त्वरमाणं विहायसा । आमुक्तमिव पाखण्डं योऽधर्मे धर्मविभ्रम: ॥ १२ ॥
tam atrir bhagavān aikṣat
[tam atrir bhagavaan aikshat]
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
[tvaramaanam vihaayasaa]
āmuktam iva pākhaṇḍaṁ
[aamuktam iva paakhandam]
yo ’dharme dharma-vibhramaḥ
[yo ’dharme dharma-vibhramah]
tam — King Indra atriḥ — the sage Atri bhagavān — most powerful aikṣat — could see tvaramāṇam — moving very hastily vihāyasā — in outer space āmuktam iva — like a liberated person pākhaṇḍam — imposter yaḥ — one who adharme — in irreligion dharma — religion vibhramaḥ — mistaking.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam atrir bhagavān aikṣat
tam
King Indra
atriḥ
the sage Atri
bhagavān
most powerful
aikṣat
could see
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
tvaramāṇam
moving very hastily
vihāyasā
in outer space
āmuktam iva pākhaṇḍaṁ
āmuktam iva
like a liberated person
pākhaṇḍam
imposter
yaḥ
one who
adharme
in irreligion
yo ’dharme dharma-vibhramaḥ
dharma
religion
vibhramaḥ
mistaking.
When King Indra was taking away the horse, he dressed himself to appear as a liberated person. Actually this dress was a form of cheating, for it falsely created an impression of religion. When Indra went into outer space in this way, the great sage Atri saw him and understood the whole situation.

The word pākhaṇḍa used in this verse is sometimes pronounced pāṣaṇḍa. Both of these words indicate an imposter who presents himself as a very religious person but in actuality is sinful. Indra took up the saffron-colored dress as a way of cheating others. This saffron dress has been misused by many imposters who present themselves as liberated persons or incarnations of God. In this way people are cheated. As we have mentioned many times, the conditioned soul has a tendency to cheat; therefore this quality is also visible in a person like King Indra. It is understood that even King Indra is not liberated from the clutches of material contamination. Thus the words āmuktam iva, meaning “as if he were liberated,” are used. The saffron dress worn by a sannyāsī announces to the world that he has renounced all worldly affairs and is simply engaged in the service of the Lord. Such a devotee is actually a sannyāsī, or liberated person. In Bhagavad-gītā (6.1) it is said:

anāśritaḥ karma-phalaṁ kāryaṁ karma karoti yaḥ sa sannyāsī ca yogī ca na niragnir na cākriyaḥ

“One who is unattached to the fruits of his work and who works as he is obligated is in the renounced order of life, and he is the true mystic, not he who lights no fire and performs no work.”

In other words, one who offers the results of his activities to the Supreme Personality of Godhead is actually a sannyāsī and yogī. Cheating sannyāsīs and yogīs have existed since the time of Pṛthu Mahārāja’s sacrifice. This cheating was very foolishly introduced by King Indra. In some ages such cheating is very prominent, and in other ages not so prominent. It is the duty of a sannyāsī to be very cautious because, as stated by Lord Caitanya, sannyāsīra alpa chidra sarva-loke gāya: “A little spot in a sannyāsī’s character will be magnified by the public.” ( Cc. Madhya 12.51) Therefore, unless one is very sincere and serious, he should not take up the order of sannyāsa. One should not use this order as a means to cheat the public. It is better not to take up sannyāsa in this Age of Kali because provocations are very strong in this age. Only a very exalted person advanced in spiritual understanding should attempt to take up sannyāsa. One should not adopt this order as a means of livelihood or for some material purpose.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Atri saw Indra moving quickly in the sky in the dress of a heretic, who by that disguise made people think adharma to be dharma. Afraid of being seen, Indra was fleeing away quickly, and wearing (āmuktam) the dress of a heretic like armor. Amara-koṣa says that āmukta means until liberation or dressed.” By him there was an illusion of dharma with what was actually adharma
Indra dressed as a liberated person to steal; Atri saw through the disguise. Beware religion as a disguise for theft; even celestial figures use spirituality as cover.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I taking spiritual appearance at face value when I should look closer?
  • Whose 'sannyāsī dress' covers something I'd reject if it were named honestly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.13

↗
अत्रिणा चोदितो हन्तुं पृथुपुत्रो महारथ: । अन्वधावत सङ्‍कुद्धस्तिष्ठ तिष्ठेति चाब्रवीत् ॥ १३ ॥
atriṇā codito hantuṁ
[atrinaa chodito hantum]
pṛthu-putro mahā-rathaḥ
[prithu-putro mahaa-rathah]
anvadhāvata saṅkruddhas
[anvadhaavata sankruddhas]
tiṣṭha tiṣṭheti cābravīt
[tishtha tishtheti chaabraveet]
atriṇā — by the great sage Atri coditaḥ — being encouraged hantum — to kill pṛthu-putraḥ — the son of King Pṛthu mahā-rathaḥ — a great hero anvadhāvata — followed saṅkruddhaḥ — being very angry tiṣṭha tiṣṭha — just wait, just wait iti — thus ca — also abravīt — he said.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atriṇā codito hantuṁ
atriṇā
by the great sage Atri
coditaḥ
being encouraged
hantum
to kill
pṛthu-putro mahā-rathaḥ
pṛthu-putraḥ
the son of King Pṛthu
mahā-rathaḥ
a great hero
anvadhāvata saṅkruddhas
anvadhāvata
followed
saṅkruddhaḥ
being very angry
tiṣṭha tiṣṭheti cābravīt
tiṣṭha tiṣṭha
just wait, just wait
iti
thus
ca
also
abravīt
he said.
When the son of King Pṛthu was informed by Atri of King Indra’s trick, he immediately became very angry and followed Indra to kill him, calling, “Wait! Wait!”

The words tiṣṭha tiṣṭha are used by a kṣatriya when he challenges his enemy. When fighting, a kṣatriya cannot flee from the battlefield. However, when a kṣatriya out of cowardice flees from the battlefield, showing his back to his enemy, he is challenged with the words tiṣṭha tiṣṭha. A real kṣatriya does not kill his enemy from behind, nor does a real kṣatriya turn his back on the battlefield. According to kṣatriya principle and spirit, one either attains victory or dies on the battlefield. Although King Indra was very exalted, being the King of heaven, he became degraded due to his stealing the horse intended for sacrifice. Therefore he fled without observing the kṣatriya principles, and the son of Pṛthu had to challenge him with the words tiṣṭha tiṣṭha.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Encouraged by Atri to kill him, the son of Pṛthu, a great warrior, followed him in anger. He said, “Stop! Stop!”
Pṛthu's son, informed by Atri, became furious and chased Indra crying 'Wait! Wait!' The kṣatriya doesn't let the thief vanish; even spiritual decoration is no excuse for impunity.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose theft am I letting pass because they wore a spiritual disguise?
  • Where do I need to pursue rather than negotiate?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.14

↗
तं ताद‍ृशाकृतिं वीक्ष्य मेने धर्मं शरीरिणम् । जटिलं भस्मनाच्छन्नं तस्मै बाणं न मुञ्चति ॥ १४ ॥
taṁ tādṛśākṛtiṁ vīkṣya
[tam taadrishaakritim veekshya]
mene dharmaṁ śarīriṇam
[mene dharmam shareerinam]
jaṭilaṁ bhasmanācchannaṁ
[jatilam bhasmanaachchannam]
tasmai bāṇaṁ na muñcati
[tasmai baanam na munchati]
tam — him tādṛśa-ākṛtim — in such dress vīkṣya — after seeing mene — considered dharmam — pious or religious śarīriṇam — having a body jaṭilam — having knotted hair bhasmanā — by ashes ācchannam — smeared all over the body tasmai — unto him bāṇam — arrow na — not muñcati — he did release.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ tādṛśākṛtiṁ vīkṣya
tam
him
tādṛśa-ākṛtim
in such dress
vīkṣya
after seeing
mene dharmaṁ śarīriṇam
mene
considered
dharmam
pious or religious
śarīriṇam
having a body
jaṭilaṁ bhasmanācchannaṁ
jaṭilam
having knotted hair
bhasmanā
by ashes
ācchannam
smeared all over the body
tasmai bāṇaṁ na muñcati
tasmai
unto him
bāṇam
arrow
na
not
muñcati
he did release.
King Indra was fraudulently dressed as a sannyāsī, having knotted his hair on his head and smeared ashes all over his body. Upon seeing such dress, the son of King Pṛthu considered Indra a religious man and pious sannyāsī. Therefore he did not release his arrows.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing him in that dress, with matted locks and smeared in ashes, Pṛthu’s son thought he must be a religious person. He did not shoot him. He thought, “The person with this dress must being following dharma somewhat, from seeing Śiva or others.”
Seeing Indra knotted-hair, ash-smeared, the son thought him a religious sannyāsī and didn't fire. The disguise works at first; respect for spiritual symbols becomes the cover for theft.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has my respect for spiritual symbols been weaponized against me?
  • How do I learn to distinguish real renunciation from costumes that exploit my reverence?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.15

↗
वधान्निवृत्तं तं भूयो हन्तवेऽत्रिरचोदयत् । जहि यज्ञहनं तात महेन्द्रं विबुधाधमम् ॥ १५ ॥
vadhān nivṛttaṁ taṁ bhūyo
[vadhaan nivrittam tam bhooyo]
hantave ’trir acodayat
[hantave ’trir achodayat]
jahi yajña-hanaṁ tāta
[jahi yajna-hanam taata]
mahendraṁ vibudhādhamam
[mahendram vibudhaadhamam]
vadhāt — from killing nivṛttam — stopped tam — the son of Pṛthu bhūyaḥ — again hantave — for the purpose of killing atriḥ — the great sage Atri acodayat — encouraged jahi — kill yajña-hanam — one who impeded the performance of a yajña tāta — my dear son mahā-indram — the great heavenly King Indra vibudha-adhamam — the lowest of all demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vadhān nivṛttaṁ taṁ bhūyo
vadhāt
from killing
nivṛttam
stopped
tam
the son of Pṛthu
bhūyaḥ
again
hantave ’trir acodayat
hantave
for the purpose of killing
atriḥ
the great sage Atri
acodayat
encouraged
jahi yajña-hanaṁ tāta
jahi
kill
yajña-hanam
one who impeded the performance of a yajña
tāta
my dear son
mahendraṁ vibudhādhamam
mahā-indram
the great heavenly King Indra
vibudha-adhamam
the lowest of all demigods.
When Atri Muni saw that the son of King Pṛthu did not kill Indra but returned deceived by him, Atri Muni again instructed him to kill the heavenly King because he thought that Indra had become the lowliest of all demigods due to his impeding the execution of King Pṛthu’s sacrifice.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Atri again ordered the son of Pṛthu to kill him after he had refrained from doing so. “Boy! Kill the destroyer of sacrifice, great Indra, lowest of the devatās!” Hantave means “to kill.”
Atri tells him again: kill Indra — he's now the lowliest demigod for blocking the sacrifice. The teacher must clarify when a disciple's reverence has misread the situation; respect doesn't override truth.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose 'second instruction' do I need to receive before I see who is actually in front of me?
  • Where do I owe someone a clearer second word because my first was misunderstood?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.16

↗
एवं वैन्यसुत: प्रोक्तस्त्वरमाणं विहायसा । अन्वद्रवदभिक्रुद्धो रावणं गृध्रराडिव ॥ १६ ॥
evaṁ vainya-sutaḥ proktas
[evam vainya-sutah proktas]
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
[tvaramaanam vihaayasaa]
anvadravad abhikruddho
[anvadravad abhikruddho]
rāvaṇaṁ gṛdhra-rāḍ iva
[raavanam gridhra-raad iva]
evam — thus vainya-sutaḥ — the son of King Pṛthu proktaḥ — being ordered tvaramāṇam — Indra, who was moving hastily vihāyasā — in the sky anvadravat — began to chase abhikruddhaḥ — being very angry rāvaṇam — Rāvaṇa gṛdhra-rāṭ — the king of vultures iva — like.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vainya-sutaḥ proktas
evam
thus
vainya-sutaḥ
the son of King Pṛthu
proktaḥ
being ordered
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
tvaramāṇam
Indra, who was moving hastily
vihāyasā
in the sky
anvadravad abhikruddho
anvadravat
began to chase
abhikruddhaḥ
being very angry
rāvaṇaṁ gṛdhra-rāḍ iva
rāvaṇam
Rāvaṇa
gṛdhra-rāṭ
the king of vultures
iva
like.
Being thus informed, the grandson of King Vena immediately began to follow Indra, who was fleeing through the sky in great haste. He was very angry with him, and he chased him just as the king of the vultures chased Rāvaṇa.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus being ordered, the son of Pṛthu pursued Indra, who was moving quickly in the sky, just as the king of vultures Jaṭāyu pursued Rāvaṇa. Tvaramāṇam refers to Indra. The king of vultures is Jaṭāyu.
The grandson of Vena chased Indra angrily through the sky like the vulture-king chased Rāvaṇa. Anger correctly aimed at thieves dressed in robes is itself a service to dharma.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I dampen my anger before checking whether it's correctly aimed?
  • What does dharmic chasing look like in my modern environment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.17

↗
सोऽश्वं रूपं च तद्धित्वा तस्मा अन्तर्हित: स्वराट् । वीर: स्वपशुमादाय पितुर्यज्ञमुपेयिवान् ॥ १७ ॥
so ’śvaṁ rūpaṁ ca tad dhitvā
[so ’shvam roopam cha tad dhitvaa]
tasmā antarhitaḥ svarāṭ
[tasmaa antarhitah svaraat]
vīraḥ sva-paśum ādāya
[veerah sva-pashum aadaaya]
pitur yajñam upeyivān
[pitur yajnam upeyivaan]
saḥ — King Indra aśvam — the horse rūpam — the false dress of a saintly person ca — also tat — that hitvā — giving up tasmai — for him antarhitaḥ — disappeared sva-rāṭ — Indra vīraḥ — the great hero sva-paśum — his animal ādāya — having taken pituḥ — of his father yajñam — to the sacrifice upeyivān — he came back.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’śvaṁ rūpaṁ ca tad dhitvā
saḥ
King Indra
tasmā antarhitaḥ svarāṭ
aśvam
the horse
rūpam
the false dress of a saintly person
ca
also
tat
that
hitvā
giving up
tasmai
for him
vīraḥ sva-paśum ādāya
pitur yajñam upeyivān
antarhitaḥ
disappeared
sva-rāṭ
Indra
vīraḥ
the great hero
sva-paśum
his animal
ādāya
having taken
pituḥ
of his father
yajñam
to the sacrifice
upeyivān
he came back.
When Indra saw that the son of Pṛthu was chasing him, he immediately abandoned his false dress and left the horse. Indeed, he disappeared from that very spot, and the great hero, the son of Mahārāja Pṛthu, returned the horse to his father’s sacrificial arena.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Giving up the disguise and the horse, Indra became invisible to him. The hero then took the horse and returned to the sacrifice of his father.
Chased, Indra dropped the disguise and the horse and vanished; the hero returned the horse. The exposed thief flees; persistent pursuit eventually clears the field.
Reflection Questions
  • Where would persistent pursuit clear a quiet theft I've been tolerating?
  • What 'horse' am I overdue to return to its proper sacrificial arena?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.18

↗
तत्तस्य चाद्भुतं कर्म विचक्ष्य परमर्षय: । नामधेयं ददुस्तस्मै विजिताश्व इति प्रभो ॥ १८ ॥
tat tasya cādbhutaṁ karma
[tat tasya chaadbhutam karma]
vicakṣya paramarṣayaḥ
[vichakshya paramarshayah]
nāmadheyaṁ dadus tasmai
[naamadheyam dadus tasmai]
vijitāśva iti prabho
[vijitaashva iti prabho]
tat — that tasya — his ca — also adbhutam — wonderful karma — activity vicakṣya — after observing parama-ṛṣayaḥ — the great sages nāmadheyam — the name daduḥ — they offered tasmai — to him vijita-aśvaḥ — Vijitāśva (he who has won the horse) iti — thus prabho — my dear Lord Vidura.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tat tasya cādbhutaṁ karma
tat
that
tasya
his
ca
also
adbhutam
wonderful
karma
activity
vicakṣya paramarṣayaḥ
vicakṣya
after observing
parama-ṛṣayaḥ
the great sages
nāmadheyaṁ dadus tasmai
nāmadheyam
the name
daduḥ
they offered
tasmai
to him
vijitāśva iti prabho
vijita-aśvaḥ
Vijitāśva (he who has won the horse)
iti
thus
prabho
my dear Lord Vidura.
My dear Lord Vidura, when the great sages observed the wonderful prowess of the son of King Pṛthu, they all agreed to give him the name Vijitāśva.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! The great sages, seeing the son’s astounding action, gave him the name Vijitāśva, he who had won the horse. The sages gave the son (tasmai) a name. It should be understood that the same son was taught the art of disappearing, according to later statements (SB 4.24.3).
The sages named him Vijitāśva — 'horse-conqueror.' Right action under instruction earns you a name that becomes your identity.
Reflection Questions
  • What name have my recent right actions earned me, and have I lived up to it?
  • Whom can I name today after a specific virtue they've shown?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.19

↗
उपसृज्य तमस्तीव्रं जहाराश्वं पुनर्हरि: । चषालयूपतश्छन्नो हिरण्यरशनं विभु: ॥ १९ ॥
upasṛjya tamas tīvraṁ
[upasrijya tamas teevram]
jahārāśvaṁ punar hariḥ
[jahaaraashvam punar harih]
caṣāla-yūpataś channo
[chashaala-yoopatash channo]
hiraṇya-raśanaṁ vibhuḥ
[hiranya-rashanam vibhuh]
upasṛjya — creating tamaḥ — darkness tīvram — dense jahāra — took away aśvam — the horse punaḥ — again hariḥ — King Indra caṣāla-yūpataḥ — from the wooden instrument where the animals were sacrificed channaḥ — being covered hiraṇya-raśanam — tied with a gold chain vibhuḥ — very powerful.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
upasṛjya tamas tīvraṁ
upasṛjya
creating
tamaḥ
darkness
tīvram
dense
jahārāśvaṁ punar hariḥ
jahāra
took away
aśvam
the horse
punaḥ
again
hariḥ
King Indra
caṣāla-yūpataś channo
caṣāla-yūpataḥ
from the wooden instrument where the animals were sacrificed
channaḥ
being covered
hiraṇya-raśanaṁ vibhuḥ
hiraṇya-raśanam
tied with a gold chain
vibhuḥ
very powerful.
My dear Vidura, Indra, being the King of heaven and very powerful, immediately brought a dense darkness upon the sacrificial arena. Covering the whole scene in this way, he again took away the horse, which was chained with golden shackles near the wooden instrument where animals were sacrificed.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Creating intense darkness, powerful Indra, in disguise, again stole the horse with its golden rope from the sacrificial post. Creating darkness, in the disguise of a heretic (channaḥ), he again stole the horse. Caṣāla is a pile of sticks. He stole the horse from the post near the sticks. He stole the horse from the post. He took the horse tied with a golden rope, which could not be cut because of its strength, by slipping it over the tip of the post.
Indra brought dense darkness over the arena, stole the horse again from its golden shackles. When the first strategy fails, the demonic produces darker conditions to try again.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'dense darkness' is showing up in my situation, signaling a repeated attempt at theft?
  • Where do I underestimate how creatively opposition will keep trying?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.20

↗
अत्रि: सन्दर्शयामास त्वरमाणं विहायसा । कपालखट्‍वाङ्गधरं वीरो नैनमबाधत ॥ २० ॥
atriḥ sandarśayām āsa
[atrih sandarshayaam aasa]
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
[tvaramaanam vihaayasaa]
kapāla-khaṭvāṅga-dharaṁ
[kapaala-khatvaanga-dharam]
vīro nainam abādhata
[veero nainam abaadhata]
atriḥ — the great sage Atri sandarśayām āsa — caused to see tvaramāṇam — going very hastily vihāyasā — in the sky kapāla-khaṭvāṅga — a staff with a skull at the top dharam — who carried vīraḥ — the hero (King Pṛthu’s son) na — not enam — the King of heaven, Indra abādhata — killed.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atriḥ sandarśayām āsa
atriḥ
the great sage Atri
sandarśayām āsa
caused to see
tvaramāṇaṁ vihāyasā
tvaramāṇam
going very hastily
vihāyasā
in the sky
kapāla-khaṭvāṅga-dharaṁ
kapāla-khaṭvāṅga
a staff with a skull at the top
dharam
who carried
vīro nainam abādhata
vīraḥ
the hero (King Pṛthu’s son)
na
not
enam
the King of heaven, Indra
abādhata
killed.
The great sage Atri again pointed out to the son of King Pṛthu that Indra was fleeing through the sky. The great hero, the son of Pṛthu, chased him again. But when he saw that Indra was carrying in his hand a staff with a skull at the top and was again wearing the dress of a sannyāsī, he still chose not to kill him.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Atri saw him moving quickly in the sky. Pṛthu’s son did not kill him since he was carrying a staff with skull on top.
Atri points again; the son chases — but seeing Indra with skull-staff and sannyāsī dress, hesitates. Disguise after disguise; respect for spiritual symbols is exploited repeatedly.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I repeatedly fooled by superficial spiritual markers?
  • What would a more discerning second look look like in such moments?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.21

↗
अत्रिणा चोदितस्तस्मै सन्दधे विशिखं रुषा । सोऽश्वं रूपं च तद्धित्वा तस्थावन्तर्हित: स्वराट् ॥ २१ ॥
atriṇā coditas tasmai
[atrinaa choditas tasmai]
sandadhe viśikhaṁ ruṣā
[sandadhe vishikham rushaa]
so ’śvaṁ rūpaṁ ca tad dhitvā
[so ’shvam roopam cha tad dhitvaa]
tasthāv antarhitaḥ svarāṭ
[tasthaav antarhitah svaraat]
atriṇā — by the great sage Atri coditaḥ — inspired tasmai — for Lord Indra sandadhe — fixed viśikham — his arrow ruṣā — out of great anger saḥ — King Indra aśvam — horse rūpam — the dress of a sannyāsī ca — also tat — that hitvā — giving up tasthau — he remained there antarhitaḥ — invisible sva-rāṭ — the independent Indra.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
atriṇā coditas tasmai
atriṇā
by the great sage Atri
coditaḥ
inspired
tasmai
for Lord Indra
sandadhe viśikhaṁ ruṣā
sandadhe
fixed
viśikham
his arrow
ruṣā
out of great anger
saḥ
King Indra
so ’śvaṁ rūpaṁ ca tad dhitvā
tasthāv antarhitaḥ svarāṭ
aśvam
horse
rūpam
the dress of a sannyāsī
ca
also
tat
that
hitvā
giving up
tasthau
he remained there
antarhitaḥ
invisible
sva-rāṭ
the independent Indra.
When the great sage Atri again gave directions, the son of King Pṛthu became very angry and placed an arrow on his bow. Upon seeing this, King Indra immediately abandoned the false dress of a sannyāsī and, giving up the horse, made himself invisible.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Ordered by Atri, he fixed an arrow on his bow with anger. Giving up the horse and the disguise, Indra became invisible.
On Atri's third direction, the son angrily fits arrow to bow; Indra drops the disguise and vanishes. Three rounds of guidance and persistence finally outlast the impersonator's stamina.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I quitting after two rounds when three would have done it?
  • What does it mean that the impersonator's strategy itself has stamina limits?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.22

↗
वीरश्चाश्वमुपादाय पितृयज्ञमथाव्रजत् । तदवद्यं हरे रूपं जगृहुर्ज्ञानदुर्बला: ॥ २२ ॥
vīraś cāśvam upādāya
[veerash chaashvam upaadaaya]
pitṛ-yajñam athāvrajat
[pitri-yajnam athaavrajat]
tad avadyaṁ hare rūpaṁ
[tad avadyam hare roopam]
jagṛhur jñāna-durbalāḥ
[jagrihur jnaana-durbalaah]
vīraḥ — the son of King Pṛthu ca — also aśvam — the horse upādāya — taking pitṛ-yajñam — to the sacrificial arena of his father atha — thereafter avrajat — went tat — that avadyam — abominable hareḥ — of Indra rūpam — dress jagṛhuḥ — adopted jñāna-durbalāḥ — those with a poor fund of knowledge.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vīraś cāśvam upādāya
vīraḥ
the son of King Pṛthu
ca
also
aśvam
the horse
upādāya
taking
pitṛ-yajñam athāvrajat
pitṛ-yajñam
to the sacrificial arena of his father
atha
thereafter
avrajat
went
tad avadyaṁ hare rūpaṁ
tat
that
avadyam
abominable
hareḥ
of Indra
rūpam
dress
jagṛhur jñāna-durbalāḥ
jagṛhuḥ
adopted
jñāna-durbalāḥ
those with a poor fund of knowledge.
Then the great hero, Vijitāśva, the son of King Pṛthu, again took the horse and returned to his father’s sacrificial arena. Since that time, certain men with a poor fund of knowledge have adopted the dress of a false sannyāsī. It was King Indra who introduced this.

Since time immemorial, the sannyāsa order has carried the tridaṇḍa. Later Śaṅkarācārya introduced the ekadaṇḍi-sannyāsa. A tridaṇḍi-sannyāsī is a Vaiṣṇava sannyāsī, and an ekadaṇḍi-sannyāsī is a Māyāvādī sannyāsī. There are many other types of sannyāsīs, who are not approved by Vedic rituals. A type of pseudo- sannyāsa was introduced by Indra when he tried to hide himself from the attack of Vijitāśva, the great son of King Pṛthu. Now there are many different types of sannyāsīs. Some of them go naked, and some of them carry a skull and trident, generally known as kāpālika. All of them were introduced under some meaningless circumstances, and those who have a poor fund of knowledge accept these false sannyāsīs and their pretenses, although they are not bona fide guides to spiritual advancement. At the present moment some missionary institutions, without referring to the Vedic rituals, have introduced some sannyāsīs who engage in sinful activities. The sinful activities forbidden by the śāstras are illicit sex, intoxication, meat-eating and gambling. These so-called sannyāsīs indulge in all these activities. They eat meat and flesh, fish, eggs and just about everything. They sometimes drink with the excuse that without alcohol, fish and meat, it is impossible to remain in the cold countries near the Arctic zone. These sannyāsīs introduce all these sinful activities in the name of serving the poor, and consequently poor animals are cut to pieces and go into the bellies of these sannyāsīs. As described in the following verses, such sannyāsīs are pākhaṇḍīs. Vedic literature states that a person who puts Lord Nārāyaṇa on the level with Lord Śiva or Lord Brahmā immediately becomes a pākhaṇḍī. As stated in the Purāṇas:

yas tu nārāyaṇaṁ devaṁ brahma-rudrādi-daivataiḥ samatvenaiva vīkṣeta sa pāṣaṇḍī bhaved dhruvam

In Kali-yuga the pākhaṇḍīs are very prominent. However, Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has tried to kill all these pākhaṇḍīs by introducing His saṅkīrtana movement. Those who take advantage of this saṅkīrtana movement of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness will be able to save themselves from the influence of these pākhaṇḍīs.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Taking the horse, Pṛthu’s son returned to the sacrifice of his father. Foolish people after that adopted the despicable dress of Indra who was not killed. Foolish persons think that because Indra was not killed by Pṛthu’s son, they also cannot be killed. Starting their own sampradaya which propagated ideas to spoil sacrifice, they desired to define the goal as powers like stealing others’ wealth and disappearing as their goal.
Vijitāśva returned the horse; thereafter, certain unlearned men adopted false sannyāsī dress — introduced by Indra. Whole spiritual subcultures are sometimes downstream of one celestial act of envy.
Reflection Questions
  • Which contemporary spiritual subculture might be downstream of an old act of celestial cheating?
  • Where do I participate in something whose origin I haven't traced?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.23

↗
यानि रूपाणि जगृहे इन्द्रो हयजिहीर्षया । तानि पापस्य खण्डानि लिङ्गं खण्डमिहोच्यते ॥ २३ ॥
yāni rūpāṇi jagṛhe
[yaani roopaani jagrihe]
indro haya-jihīrṣayā
[indro haya-jiheershayaa]
tāni pāpasya khaṇḍāni
[taani paapasya khandaani]
liṅgaṁ khaṇḍam ihocyate
[lingam khandam ihochyate]
yāni — all those which rūpāṇi — forms jagṛhe — accepted indraḥ — the King of heaven haya — the horse jihīrṣayā — with a desire to steal tāni — all those pāpasya — of sinful activities khaṇḍāni — signs liṅgam — the symbol khaṇḍam — the word khaṇḍa iha — here ucyate — is said.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yāni rūpāṇi jagṛhe
yāni
all those which
rūpāṇi
forms
jagṛhe
accepted
indro haya-jihīrṣayā
indraḥ
the King of heaven
haya
the horse
jihīrṣayā
with a desire to steal
tāni pāpasya khaṇḍāni
tāni
all those
pāpasya
of sinful activities
khaṇḍāni
signs
liṅgaṁ khaṇḍam ihocyate
liṅgam
the symbol
khaṇḍam
the word khaṇḍa
iha
here
ucyate
is said.
Whatever different forms Indra assumed as a mendicant because of his desire to seize the horse were symbols of atheistic philosophy.

According to Vedic civilization, sannyāsa is one of the essential items in the program of the varṇāśrama institution. One should accept sannyāsa according to the paramparā system of the ācāryas. At the present moment, however, many so-called sannyāsīs or mendicants have no understanding of God consciousness. Such sannyāsa was introduced by Indra because of his jealousy of Mahārāja Pṛthu, and what he introduced is again appearing in the Age of Kali. Practically none of the sannyāsīs in this age are bona fide. No one can introduce any new system into the Vedic way of life; if one does so out of malice, he is to be known as a pāṣaṇḍī, or atheist. In the Vaiṣṇava Tantra it is said:

yas tu nārāyaṇaṁ devaṁ brahma-rudrādi-daivataiḥ samatvenaiva vīkṣeta sa pāṣaṇḍī bhaved dhruvam

Although it is forbidden, there are many pāṣaṇḍīs who coin terms like daridra-nārāyaṇa and svāmi-nārāyaṇa, although not even such demigods as Brahmā and Śiva can be equal to Nārāyaṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Whatever forms Indra accepted for stealing the horse, those became symbols or khaṇḍa of sin. Thus those persons are called pākhaṇḍas or pāṣaṇḍas. This verse derives the meaning of pākhāṇḍa (heretic). The plural is used to indicate that many varieties of pāṣaṇdaṣ appeared.
Whatever forms Indra assumed as mendicant were symbols of atheistic philosophy. Religious aesthetics can carry exactly the opposite metaphysics; aesthetic and doctrine separate easily.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have I bought a metaphysics by mistake while buying its aesthetic?
  • What does my own visual presentation suggest that may not match my actual beliefs?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.24-25

↗
एवमिन्द्रे हरत्यश्वं वैन्ययज्ञजिघांसया । तद्गृहीतविसृष्टेषु पाखण्डेषु मतिर्नृणाम् ॥ २४ ॥ धर्म इत्युपधर्मेषु नग्नरक्तपटादिषु । प्रायेण सज्जते भ्रान्त्या पेशलेषु च वाग्मिषु ॥ २५ ॥
evam indre haraty aśvaṁ
[evam indre haraty ashvam]
vainya-yajña-jighāṁsayā
[vainya-yajna-jighaamsayaa]
tad-gṛhīta-visṛṣṭeṣu
[tad-griheeta-visrishteshu]
pākhaṇḍeṣu matir nṛṇām
[paakhandeshu matir nrinaam]
dharma ity upadharmeṣu
[dharma ity upadharmeshu]
nagna-rakta-paṭādiṣu
[nagna-rakta-pataadishu]
prāyeṇa sajjate bhrāntyā
[praayena sajjate bhraantyaa]
peśaleṣu ca vāgmiṣu
[peshaleshu cha vaagmishu]
evam — thus indre — when the King of heaven harati — stole aśvam — the horse vainya — of the son of King Vena yajña — the sacrifice jighāṁsayā — with a desire to stop tat — by him gṛhīta — accepted visṛṣṭeṣu — abandoned pākhaṇḍeṣu — towards the sinful dress matiḥ — attraction nṛṇām — of the people in general dharmaḥ — system of religion iti — thus upadharmeṣu — towards false religious systems nagna — naked rakta-paṭa — red-robed ādiṣu — etc. prāyeṇa — generally sajjate — is attracted bhrāntyā — foolishly peśaleṣu — expert ca — and vāgmiṣu — eloquent.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evam indre haraty aśvaṁ
evam
thus
indre
when the King of heaven
harati
stole
aśvam
the horse
vainya-yajña-jighāṁsayā
vainya
of the son of King Vena
yajña
the sacrifice
jighāṁsayā
with a desire to stop
tad-gṛhīta-visṛṣṭeṣu
tat
by him
gṛhīta
accepted
visṛṣṭeṣu
abandoned
pākhaṇḍeṣu matir nṛṇām
pākhaṇḍeṣu
towards the sinful dress
matiḥ
attraction
nṛṇām
of the people in general
dharma ity upadharmeṣu
dharmaḥ
system of religion
iti
thus
upadharmeṣu
towards false religious systems
nagna-rakta-paṭādiṣu
nagna
naked
rakta-paṭa
red-robed
ādiṣu
etc.
prāyeṇa sajjate bhrāntyā
prāyeṇa
generally
sajjate
is attracted
bhrāntyā
foolishly
peśaleṣu ca vāgmiṣu
peśaleṣu
expert
ca
and
vāgmiṣu
eloquent.
In this way King Indra, in order to steal the horse from King Pṛthu’s sacrifice, adopted several orders of sannyāsa. Some sannyāsīs go naked, and sometimes they wear red garments and pass under the name of kāpālika. These are simply symbolic representations of their sinful activities. These so-called sannyāsīs are very much appreciated by sinful men because they are all godless atheists and very expert in putting forward arguments and reasons to support their case. We must know, however, that they are only passing as adherents of religion and are not so in fact. Unfortunately, bewildered persons accept them as religious, and being attracted to them, they spoil their life.

As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, men in this Age of Kali are short-lived, devoid of spiritual knowledge, and susceptible to accept false religious systems due to their unfortunate condition. Thus they always remain mentally disturbed. The Vedic śāstras practically prohibit the adoption of sannyāsa in the Age of Kali because less intelligent men may accept the sannyāsa order for cheating purposes. Actually the only religion is the religion of surrender unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead. We must serve the Lord in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. All other systems of sannyāsa and religion are actually not bona fide. In this age they are simply passing for religious systems. This is most regrettable.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Indra stole the horse with a desire to stop the sacrifice of Pṛthu, people’s minds became attracted to those disguises of heretics which he assumed and rejected, thinking by mistake that these resemblances to dharma, in the form of going naked, wearing red cloth and speaking skillfully, were real dharma. The foolish became attracted to the clothing which Indra accepted and later rejected. “Naked persons” refers to the Jains. “Wearing red cloth” refers to the Buddhists. Ādīṣu (etc.) refers to followers of Śiva who carry a skull and other as well. Upadharma means resembling dharma, but not dharma. They speak with instantly charming words (peśaleṣu vāgmiṣu), skilful at logic.
Indra adopted naked or red-cloth sannyāsa; modern fallen souls love such irregular orders. Counterfeit asceticism has a long lineage; learn to spot the real article.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'naked' or 'kāpālika' mode of supposed renunciation in my era misleads sincere seekers?
  • Where am I myself attracted to the counterfeit because the real article is more demanding?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.26

↗
तदभिज्ञाय भगवान्पृथु: पृथुपराक्रम: । इन्द्राय कुपितो बाणमादत्तोद्यतकार्मुक: ॥ २६ ॥
tad abhijñāya bhagavān
[tad abhijnaaya bhagavaan]
pṛthuḥ pṛthu-parākramaḥ
[prithuh prithu-paraakramah]
indrāya kupito bāṇam
[indraaya kupito baanam]
ādattodyata-kārmukaḥ
[aadattodyata-kaarmukah]
tat — that abhijñāya — understanding bhagavān — the incarnation of Godhead pṛthuḥ — King Pṛthu pṛthu-parākramaḥ — celebrated as very powerful indrāya — upon Indra kupitaḥ — being very angry bāṇam — an arrow ādatta — took up udyata — having taken up kārmukaḥ — the bow.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad abhijñāya bhagavān
tat
that
abhijñāya
understanding
bhagavān
the incarnation of Godhead
pṛthuḥ pṛthu-parākramaḥ
pṛthuḥ
King Pṛthu
pṛthu-parākramaḥ
celebrated as very powerful
indrāya kupito bāṇam
indrāya
upon Indra
kupitaḥ
being very angry
bāṇam
an arrow
ādattodyata-kārmukaḥ
ādatta
took up
udyata
having taken up
kārmukaḥ
the bow.
Mahārāja Pṛthu, who was celebrated as very powerful, immediately took up his bow and arrows and prepared to kill Indra himself, because Indra had introduced such irregular sannyāsa orders.

It is the duty of the king not to tolerate the introduction of any irreligious systems. Since King Pṛthu was an incarnation of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, certainly his duty was to cut down all kinds of irreligious systems. Following in his footsteps, all heads of state should themselves be bona fide representatives of God and should cut down all irreligious systems. Unfortunately they are cowards who declare a secular state. Such a mentality is a way of compromising religious and irreligious systems, but because of this citizens are generally becoming uninterested in spiritual advancement. Thus the situation deteriorates to such an extent that human society becomes hellish.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Understanding this, Pṛthu, greatly courageous and angry at Indra, took up his bow and aimed his arrow.
Powerful Pṛthu took up his bow to kill Indra himself for introducing irregular sannyāsa. Some founders of bad orders must be stopped; the king's job includes structural reform.
Reflection Questions
  • Which bad order in my domain am I letting propagate that someone with my authority should stop?
  • Where do I refrain from structural action because it feels personal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.27

↗
तमृत्विज: शक्रवधाभिसन्धितंविचक्ष्य दुष्प्रेक्ष्यमसह्यरंहसम् निवारयामासुरहो महामतेन युज्यतेऽत्रान्यवध: प्रचोदितात् ॥ २७ ॥
tam ṛtvijaḥ śakra-vadhābhisandhitaṁ
[tam ritvijah shakra-vadhaabhisandhitam]
vicakṣya duṣprekṣyam asahya-raṁhasam
[vichakshya dushprekshyam asahya-ramhasam]
nivārayām āsur aho mahā-mate
[nivaarayaam aasur aho mahaa-mate]
na yujyate ’trānya-vadhaḥ pracoditāt
[na yujyate ’traanya-vadhah prachoditaat]
tam — King Pṛthu ṛtvijaḥ — the priests śakra-vadha — killing the King of heaven abhisandhitam — thus preparing himself vicakṣya — having observed duṣprekṣyam — terrible to look at asahya — unbearable raṁhasam — whose velocity nivārayām āsuḥ — they forbade aho — oh mahā-mate — O great soul na — not yujyate — is worthy for you atra — in this sacrificial arena anya — others vadhaḥ — killing pracoditāt — from being so directed in the scriptures.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam ṛtvijaḥ śakra-vadhābhisandhitaṁ
tam
King Pṛthu
ṛtvijaḥ
the priests
śakra-vadha
killing the King of heaven
abhisandhitam
thus preparing himself
vicakṣya duṣprekṣyam asahya-raṁhasam
vicakṣya
having observed
duṣprekṣyam
terrible to look at
asahya
unbearable
raṁhasam
whose velocity
nivārayām āsur aho mahā-mate
nivārayām āsuḥ
they forbade
aho
oh
mahā-mate
O great soul
na yujyate ’trānya-vadhaḥ pracoditāt
na
not
yujyate
is worthy for you
atra
in this sacrificial arena
anya
others
vadhaḥ
killing
pracoditāt
from being so directed in the scriptures.
When the priests and all the others saw Mahārāja Pṛthu very angry and prepared to kill Indra, they requested him: O great soul, do not kill him, for only sacrificial animals can be killed in a sacrifice. Such are the directions given by śāstra.

Animal killing is intended for different purposes: it tests the proper pronunciation of Vedic mantras, and an animal being put into the sacrificial fire should come out with a new life. No one should ever be killed in a sacrifice meant for the satisfaction of Lord Viṣṇu. How then could Indra be killed when he is actually worshiped in the yajña and accepted as part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead? Therefore the priests requested King Pṛthu not to kill him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Observing that Pṛthu, who was terrible to behold, having intolerable speed against his enemies, was preparing to kill Indra, the priests prevented him. O great soul! From what is declared in scriptures, it is not proper that other killing should take place in this sacrifice.” Ahisandhitam means “having the intention.” Vicakṣya means “seeing.” Because of the prescriptions of scripture (pracoditāt) no killing except the sacrifice of the animals is allowed.
The priests urged restraint: only sacrificial animals can be killed in a sacrifice, per śāstra. Even when you have the cause, the venue matters; correctness of arena is its own discipline.
Reflection Questions
  • Which legitimate cause am I tempted to pursue in the wrong venue?
  • Where does honoring the venue's rules postpone but not deny just action?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.28

↗
वयं मरुत्वन्तमिहार्थनाशनंह्वयामहे त्वच्छ्रवसा हतत्विषम् अयातयामोपहवैरनन्तरंप्रसह्य राजन् जुहवाम तेऽहितम् ॥ २८ ॥
vayaṁ marutvantam ihārtha-nāśanaṁ
[vayam marutvantam ihaartha-naashanam]
hvayāmahe tvac-chravasā hata-tviṣam
[hvayaamahe tvach-chravasaa hata-tvisham]
ayātayāmopahavair anantaraṁ
[ayaatayaamopahavair anantaram]
prasahya rājan juhavāma te ’hitam
[prasahya raajan juhavaama te ’hitam]
vayam — we marut-vantam — King Indra iha — here artha — of your interest nāśanam — the destroyer hvayāmahe — we shall call tvat-śravasā — by your glory hata-tviṣam — already bereft of his power ayātayāma — never before used upahavaiḥ — by mantras of invocation anantaram — without delay prasahya — by force rājan — O King juhavāma — we shall sacrifice in the fire te — your ahitam — enemy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vayaṁ marutvantam ihārtha-nāśanaṁ
vayam
we
marut-vantam
King Indra
iha
here
artha
of your interest
nāśanam
the destroyer
hvayāmahe tvac-chravasā hata-tviṣam
hvayāmahe
we shall call
tvat-śravasā
by your glory
hata-tviṣam
already bereft of his power
ayātayāmopahavair anantaraṁ
ayātayāma
never before used
upahavaiḥ
by mantras of invocation
anantaram
without delay
prasahya rājan juhavāma te ’hitam
prasahya
by force
rājan
O King
juhavāma
we shall sacrifice in the fire
te
your
ahitam
enemy.
Dear King, Indra’s powers are already reduced due to his attempt to impede the execution of your sacrifice. We shall call him by Vedic mantras which were never before used, and certainly he will come. Thus by the power of our mantra, we shall cast him into the fire because he is your enemy.

By chanting the Vedic mantras properly in a sacrifice, one can perform many wonderful things. In Kali-yuga, however, there are no qualified brāhmaṇas who can chant the mantras properly. Consequently no attempt should be made to perform such big sacrifices. In this age the only sacrifice recommended is the saṅkīrtana movement.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! We will call Indra, the destroyer of your goal, who has lost his power, to this sacrifice by fresh mantras and without delay will forcibly offer him into the fire. “What is the remedy in this situation?” They explain. We will call him using beckoning prayers, āhvana-mantras (upahavaiḥ), whose power is not worn out (ayātayāma). Though this particular Indra was an avatāra of the Lord, and the priests were not materialists, they spoke in this way to show the nature of those following the path of karma: even intelligent persons on this path become blind. As Brahmā becomes blind by lust, Śiva becomes blind by anger, so the nature of Indra who is avatāra of Viṣṇu is revealed to have envy and crookedness.
The priests offer to call Indra by previously-unused mantras and cast him into the fire. Specific technical responses exist for specific threats; the lineage carries countermeasures beyond brute force.
Reflection Questions
  • Which 'specific countermeasure' from tradition have I not yet learned?
  • Where do I default to brute force when precise technique would resolve it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.29

↗
इत्यामन्‍त्र्‍य क्रतुपतिं विदुरास्यर्त्विजो रुषा । स्रुग्घस्ताञ्जुह्वतोऽभ्येत्य स्वयम्भू: प्रत्यषेधत ॥ २९ ॥
ity āmantrya kratu-patiṁ
[ity aamantrya kratu-patim]
vidurāsyartvijo ruṣā
[viduraasyartvijo rushaa]
srug-ghastāṣ juhvato ’bhyetya
[srug-ghastaash juhvato ’bhyetya]
svayambhūḥ pratyaṣedhata
[svayambhooh pratyashedhata]
iti — thus āmantrya — after informing kratu-patim — King Pṛthu, the master of the sacrifice vidura — O Vidura asya — of Pṛthu ṛtvijaḥ — the priests ruṣā — in great anger sruk-hastān — with the sacrificial ladle in hand juhvataḥ — performing the fire sacrifice abhyetya — having begun svayambhūḥ — Lord Brahmā pratyaṣedhata — asked them to stop.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity āmantrya kratu-patiṁ
iti
thus
āmantrya
after informing
kratu-patim
King Pṛthu, the master of the sacrifice
vidurāsyartvijo ruṣā
vidura
O Vidura
asya
of Pṛthu
ṛtvijaḥ
the priests
ruṣā
in great anger
srug-ghastāṣ juhvato ’bhyetya
sruk-hastān
with the sacrificial ladle in hand
juhvataḥ
performing the fire sacrifice
abhyetya
having begun
svayambhūḥ pratyaṣedhata
svayambhūḥ
Lord Brahmā
pratyaṣedhata
asked them to stop.
My dear Vidura, after giving the King this advice, the priests who had been engaged in performing the sacrifice called for Indra, the King of heaven, in a mood of great anger. When they were just ready to put the oblation in the fire, Lord Brahmā appeared on the scene and forbade them to start the sacrifice.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After informing the king of sacrifice, Brahmā approached the priests of Pṛthu, who, ladle in hand, were offering oblations in anger. He stopped them. Asya means “of Pṛthu.”
Just as the priests are about to perform the dangerous oblation, Brahmā appears and forbids it. Sometimes the highest authority arrives precisely to prevent your justified-but-excessive response.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose voice — from the highest authority — should I be open to receiving as a 'stop'?
  • Where am I about to act righteously in a way that the lineage would actually forbid?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.30

↗
न वध्यो भवतामिन्द्रो यद्यज्ञो भगवत्तनु: । यं जिघांसथ यज्ञेन यस्येष्टास्तनव: सुरा: ॥ ३० ॥
na vadhyo bhavatām indro
[na vadhyo bhavataam indro]
yad yajño bhagavat-tanuḥ
[yad yajno bhagavat-tanuh]
yaṁ jighāṁsatha yajñena
[yam jighaamsatha yajnena]
yasyeṣṭās tanavaḥ surāḥ
[yasyeshtaas tanavah suraah]
na — not vadhyaḥ — ought to be killed bhavatām — by all of you indraḥ — the King of heaven yat — because yajñaḥ — a name of Indra bhagavat-tanuḥ — part of the body of the Supreme Personality of Godhead yam — whom jighāṁsatha — you wish to kill yajñena — by performing sacrifice yasya — of Indra iṣṭāḥ — being worshiped tanavaḥ — parts of the body surāḥ — the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na vadhyo bhavatām indro
na
not
vadhyaḥ
ought to be killed
bhavatām
by all of you
indraḥ
the King of heaven
yad yajño bhagavat-tanuḥ
yat
because
yajñaḥ
a name of Indra
bhagavat-tanuḥ
part of the body of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
yaṁ jighāṁsatha yajñena
yam
whom
jighāṁsatha
you wish to kill
yajñena
by performing sacrifice
yasyeṣṭās tanavaḥ surāḥ
yasya
of Indra
iṣṭāḥ
being worshiped
tanavaḥ
parts of the body
surāḥ
the demigods.
Lord Brahmā addressed them thus: My dear sacrificial performers, you cannot kill Indra, the King of heaven. It is not your duty. You should know that Indra is as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Indeed, he is one of the most powerful assistants of the Personality of Godhead. You are trying to satisfy all the demigods by the performance of this yajña, but you should know that all these demigods are but parts and parcels of Indra, the King of heaven. How, then, can you kill him in this great sacrifice?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You should not kill Indra because he is the body of the Lord. You wish to kill Indra by a sacrifice in which the devatās, part of his body, are worshipped. Indra is the body of the Lord. The brāhmaṇas should not try to kill the form of the Lord. What is the use of being brāhmaṇas then (bhavatām)? You wish to kill him by sacrifice, but how can you kill the personification of sacrifice, Indra, by sacrifice? It is like throwing a small amount of milk in a fire. Moreover, the devatās, who are parts of his body, are worshipped by us in the sacrifice. How can he die? You did not consider this.
Brahmā says: don't kill Indra; he's also a powerful assistant of the Lord. The 'enemy' often turns out to be in a complex divine arrangement; don't burn him.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom am I treating as enemy who is actually part of a divine arrangement I don't see?
  • Where would the longer-view from a higher authority reveal collaborators in my apparent rivals?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.31

↗
तदिदं पश्यत महद्धर्मव्यतिकरं द्विजा: । इन्द्रेणानुष्ठितं राज्ञ: कर्मैतद्विजिघांसता ॥ ३१ ॥
tad idaṁ paśyata mahad-
[tad idam pashyata mahad-]
dharma-vyatikaraṁ dvijāḥ
[dharma-vyatikaram dvijaah]
indreṇānuṣṭhitaṁ rājñaḥ
[indrenaanushthitam raajnah]
karmaitad vijighāṁsatā
[karmaitad vijighaamsataa]
tat — then idam — this paśyata — just see mahat — great dharma — of religious life vyatikaram — violation dvijāḥ — O great brāhmaṇas indreṇa — by Indra anuṣṭhitam — performed rājñaḥ — of the King karma — activity etat — this sacrifice vijighāṁsatā — desiring to impede.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad idaṁ paśyata mahad-
tat
then
idam
this
paśyata
just see
mahat
great
dharma-vyatikaraṁ dvijāḥ
dharma
of religious life
vyatikaram
violation
dvijāḥ
O great brāhmaṇas
indreṇānuṣṭhitaṁ rājñaḥ
indreṇa
by Indra
anuṣṭhitam
performed
rājñaḥ
of the King
karmaitad vijighāṁsatā
karma
activity
etat
this sacrifice
vijighāṁsatā
desiring to impede.
In order to make trouble and impede the performance of King Pṛthu’s great sacrifice, King Indra has adopted some means that in the future will destroy the clear path of religious life. I draw your attention to this fact. If you oppose him any further, he will further misuse his power and introduce many other irreligious systems.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O brāhmaṇas! See the great disruption of dharma that Indra has caused by desiring to obstruct the King’s sacrifice. Moreover, by his dress, adharma will increase. See how adharma has become factual in this kingdom. Dharma-vyatikaram means the path of the heretics (pāṣaṇda).
Indra's mischief will create future trouble; if you oppose him further, he will introduce yet more irreligions. Some bad actors compound their damage if pressed; sometimes containment beats confrontation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where would further pressing of a bad actor actually multiply the harm?
  • What does dignified containment look like when defeating isn't possible?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.32

↗
पृथुकीर्ते: पृथोर्भूयात्तर्ह्येकोनशतक्रतु: अलं ते क्रतुभि: स्विष्टैर्यद्भवान्मोक्षधर्मवित् ॥ ३२ ॥
pṛthu-kīrteḥ pṛthor bhūyāt
[prithu-keerteh prithor bhooyaat]
tarhy ekona-śata-kratuḥ
[tarhy ekona-shata-kratuh]
alaṁ te kratubhiḥ sviṣṭair
[alam te kratubhih svishtair]
yad bhavān mokṣa-dharma-vit
[yad bhavaan moksha-dharma-vit]
pṛthu-kīrteḥ — of wide renown pṛthoḥ — of King Pṛthu bhūyāt — let it be tarhi — therefore eka-ūna-śata-kratuḥ — he who performed ninety-nine yajñas alam — there is nothing to be gained te — of you kratubhiḥ — by performing sacrifices su-iṣṭaiḥ — well performed yat — because bhavān — yourself mokṣa-dharma-vit — the knower of the path of liberation.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pṛthu-kīrteḥ pṛthor bhūyāt
pṛthu-kīrteḥ
of wide renown
pṛthoḥ
of King Pṛthu
bhūyāt
let it be
tarhy ekona-śata-kratuḥ
tarhi
therefore
eka-ūna-śata-kratuḥ
he who performed ninety-nine yajñas
alaṁ te kratubhiḥ sviṣṭair
alam
there is nothing to be gained
te
of you
kratubhiḥ
by performing sacrifices
su-iṣṭaiḥ
well performed
yad bhavān mokṣa-dharma-vit
yat
because
bhavān
yourself
mokṣa-dharma-vit
the knower of the path of liberation.
“Let there be only ninety-nine sacrificial performances for Mahārāja Pṛthu,” Lord Brahmā concluded. Lord Brahmā then turned towards Mahārāja Pṛthu and informed him that since he was thoroughly aware of the path of liberation, what was the use in performing more sacrifices?

Lord Brahmā came down to pacify King Pṛthu regarding his continual performance of one hundred sacrifices. King Pṛthu was determined to perform one hundred sacrifices, and King Indra took this very seriously because Indra himself was known as the performer of one hundred sacrifices. Just as it is the nature of all living entities within this material world to become envious of their competitors, King Indra, although King of heaven, was also envious of King Pṛthu and therefore wanted to stop him from performing one hundred sacrifices. Actually there was great competition, and King Indra, to satisfy his senses, began to invent so many irreligious systems to obstruct King Pṛthu. To stop these irreligious inventions, Lord Brahmā personally appeared in the sacrificial arena. As far as Mahārāja Pṛthu was concerned, he was a great devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; therefore it was not necessary for him to perform the prescribed Vedic ritualistic ceremonies. Such ceremonies are known as karma, and there is no need for a devotee in the transcendental position to execute them. As the ideal king, however, it was King Pṛthu’s duty to perform sacrifices. A compromise was therefore to be worked out. By the blessings of Lord Brahmā, King Pṛthu would become more famous than King Indra. Thus Pṛthu’s determination to perform one hundred sacrifices was indirectly fulfilled by the blessings of Lord Brahmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Pṛthu, of great fame, should perform only ninety-nine sacrifices. What is to be gained by well performed sacrifices, since you know the path of liberation? “What are you suggesting I do?” Ninety-nine sacrifices is a great number (pṛthu). This will give him greater fame (pṛthu-kīrteḥ) that Indra with his hundred sacrifices. By that, his fame will be complete. This will happen because of my blessings. The number ninety-nine is specifically mentioned, being one short of a hundred. That number is perfect for Pṛthu. Though his vow was incomplete, by my blessings, the ninety-nine become perfect. Having spoken to the priests, Brahmā then addressed Pṛthu and said, “These sacrifices are not necessary for you.”
Let there be only 99 sacrifices; you already know liberation — what's the use of more? At a certain stage, additional sacrifices are excess; the wise stop when they've reached the goal.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I adding 100th-sacrifices when 99 would do?
  • What pattern of doing-more is actually masking 'I haven't realized what I already have'?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.33

↗
नैवात्मने महेन्द्राय रोषमाहर्तुमर्हसि । उभावपि हि भद्रं ते उत्तमश्लोकविग्रहौ ॥ ३३ ॥
naivātmane mahendrāya
[naivaatmane mahendraaya]
roṣam āhartum arhasi
[rosham aahartum arhasi]
ubhāv api hi bhadraṁ te
[ubhaav api hi bhadram te]
uttamaśloka-vigrahau
[uttamashloka-vigrahau]
na — not eva — certainly ātmane — nondifferent from you mahā-indrāya — upon the King of heaven, Indra roṣam — anger āhartum — to apply arhasi — you ought ubhau — both of you api — certainly hi — also bhadram — good fortune te — unto you uttama-śloka-vigrahau — incarnations of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
naivātmane mahendrāya
na
not
eva
certainly
ātmane
nondifferent from you
mahā-indrāya
upon the King of heaven, Indra
roṣam āhartum arhasi
roṣam
anger
āhartum
to apply
arhasi
you ought
ubhāv api hi bhadraṁ te
ubhau
both of you
api
certainly
hi
also
bhadram
good fortune
te
unto you
uttamaśloka-vigrahau
uttama-śloka-vigrahau
incarnations of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
Lord Brahmā continued: Let there be good fortune to both of you, for you and King Indra are both part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore you should not be angry with King Indra, who is nondifferent from you.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You should not show anger to Indra, since he is non-different from you. Good fortune to both of you, who are forms of the Supreme Lord! You should not show anger, because he is non-different from you, since you are both avatāras of the Lord.
Be at peace; you and Indra are both part of the Lord. The 'enemy/I' frame dissolves when both are recognized as belonging to the same Whole.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could remembering shared belonging dissolve a current rivalry?
  • What is the smallest first peace I could make today?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.34

↗
मास्मिन्महाराज कृथा: स्म चिन्तांनिशामयास्मद्वच आद‍ृतात्मा यद्ध्यायतो दैवहतं नु कर्तुंमनोऽतिरुष्टं विशते तमोऽन्धम् ॥ ३४ ॥
māsmin mahārāja kṛthāḥ sma cintāṁ
[maasmin mahaaraaja krithaah sma chintaam]
niśāmayāsmad-vaca ādṛtātmā
[nishaamayaasmad-vacha aadritaatmaa]
yad dhyāyato daiva-hataṁ nu kartuṁ
[yad dhyaayato daiva-hatam nu kartum]
mano ’tiruṣṭaṁ viśate tamo ’ndham
[mano ’tirushtam vishate tamo ’ndham]
mā — do not asmin — in this mahā-rāja — O King kṛthāḥ — do sma — as done in the past cintām — agitation of the mind niśāmaya — please consider asmat — my vacaḥ — words ādṛta-ātmā — being very respectful yat — because dhyāyataḥ — of him who is contemplating daiva-hatam — that which is thwarted by providence nu — certainly kartum — to do manaḥ — the mind ati-ruṣṭam — very angry viśate — enters tamaḥ — darkness andham — dense.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māsmin mahārāja kṛthāḥ sma cintāṁ
mā
do not
asmin
in this
mahā-rāja
O King
kṛthāḥ
do
sma
as done in the past
cintām
agitation of the mind
niśāmayāsmad-vaca ādṛtātmā
niśāmaya
please consider
asmat
my
vacaḥ
words
ādṛta-ātmā
being very respectful
yad dhyāyato daiva-hataṁ nu kartuṁ
yat
because
dhyāyataḥ
of him who is contemplating
daiva-hatam
that which is thwarted by providence
nu
certainly
kartum
to do
mano ’tiruṣṭaṁ viśate tamo ’ndham
manaḥ
the mind
ati-ruṣṭam
very angry
viśate
enters
tamaḥ
darkness
andham
dense.
My dear King, do not be agitated and anxious because your sacrifices have not been properly executed due to providential impediments. Kindly take my words with great respect. We should always remember that if something happens by providential arrangement, we should not be very sorry. The more we try to rectify such reversals, the more we enter into the darkest region of materialistic thought.

Sometimes the saintly or very religious person also has to meet with reversals in life. Such incidents should be taken as providential. Although there may be sufficient cause for being unhappy, one should avoid counteracting such reversals, for the more we become implicated in rectifying such reversals, the more we enter into the darkest regions of material anxiety. Lord Kṛṣṇa has also advised us in this connection: we should tolerate things instead of becoming agitated.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O King! Being respectful, hearing my words, do not worry about the incomplete sacrifice, because the angry mind of one who mediates on doing what is destroyed by fate enters into deepest illusion. He speaks to Pṛthu who is meditating on the incomplete sacrifice. Certainly the mind of the person who mediates on doing what is destroyed by fate enters into the deepest illusion. He does not attain peace.
Don't grieve providential impediments; rectifying them too vigorously creates more disturbance. Some setbacks are providence; the wise accept rather than over-correct.
Reflection Questions
  • Which setback have I tried to over-correct, generating more disturbance?
  • Where could acceptance of providence settle a churn I've been driving?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.35

↗
क्रतुर्विरमतामेष देवेषु दुरवग्रह: । धर्मव्यतिकरो यत्र पाखण्डैरिन्द्रनिर्मितै: ॥ ३५ ॥
kratur viramatām eṣa
[kratur viramataam esha]
deveṣu duravagrahaḥ
[deveshu duravagrahah]
dharma-vyatikaro yatra
[dharma-vyatikaro yatra]
pākhaṇḍair indra-nirmitaiḥ
[paakhandair indra-nirmitaih]
kratuḥ — the sacrifice viramatām — let it stop eṣaḥ — this deveṣu — amongst the demigods duravagrahaḥ — addiction to unwanted things dharma-vyatikaraḥ — violation of religious principles yatra — where pākhaṇḍaiḥ — by sinful activities indra — by the King of heaven nirmitaiḥ — manufactured.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kratur viramatām eṣa
kratuḥ
the sacrifice
viramatām
let it stop
eṣaḥ
this
deveṣu duravagrahaḥ
deveṣu
amongst the demigods
duravagrahaḥ
addiction to unwanted things
dharma-vyatikaro yatra
dharma-vyatikaraḥ
violation of religious principles
yatra
where
pākhaṇḍair indra-nirmitaiḥ
pākhaṇḍaiḥ
by sinful activities
indra
by the King of heaven
nirmitaiḥ
manufactured.
Lord Brahmā continued: Stop the performance of these sacrifices, for they have induced Indra to introduce so many irreligious aspects. You should know very well that even amongst the demigods there are many unwanted desires.

There are many competitors in ordinary business affairs, and the karma-kāṇḍa chapters of the Vedas sometimes cause competition and envy amongst karmīs. A karmī must be envious because he wishes to enjoy material pleasures to their fullest extent. That is the material disease. Consequently there is always competition amongst karmīs, either in ordinary business affairs or in the performance of yajña. Lord Brahmā’s purpose was to end the competition between Lord Indra and Mahārāja Pṛthu. Because Mahārāja Pṛthu was a great devotee and incarnation of God, he was requested to stop the sacrifices so that Indra might not further introduce irreligious systems, which are always followed by criminal-minded people.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Let this sacrifice be stopped! In this sacrifice, among the devatās, Indra has become stubborn, and dharma has been destroyed by heretics introduced by Indra. Therefore stop the sacrifice. “Can’t Indra be stopped?” Among the devatās, he is very stubborn. Yatra means “in the sacrifice.”
Stop the sacrifices; they've induced Indra's mischief; even demigods have unwanted desires. Long karmic projects often invite envious interference; don't keep extending the project past its real fruit.
Reflection Questions
  • Which long project of mine has begun attracting envy and become more cost than benefit?
  • Where can I gracefully wind down and call it complete?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.36

↗
एभिरिन्द्रोपसंसृष्टै: पाखण्डैर्हारिभिर्जनम् ह्रियमाणं विचक्ष्वैनं यस्ते यज्ञध्रुगश्वमुट् ॥ ३६ ॥
ebhir indropasaṁsṛṣṭaiḥ
[ebhir indropasamsrishtaih]
pākhaṇḍair hāribhir janam
[paakhandair haaribhir janam]
hriyamāṇaṁ vicakṣvainaṁ
[hriyamaanam vichakshvainam]
yas te yajña-dhrug aśva-muṭ
[yas te yajna-dhrug ashva-mut]
ebhiḥ — by these indra-upasaṁsṛṣṭaiḥ — created by the King of heaven, Indra pākhaṇḍaiḥ — sinful activities hāribhiḥ — very attractive to the heart janam — the people in general hriyamāṇam — being carried away vicakṣva — just see enam — these yaḥ — one who te — your yajña-dhruk — creating a disturbance in the performance of the sacrifice aśva-muṭ — who stole the horse.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ebhir indropasaṁsṛṣṭaiḥ
ebhiḥ
by these
indra-upasaṁsṛṣṭaiḥ
created by the King of heaven, Indra
pākhaṇḍaiḥ
sinful activities
pākhaṇḍair hāribhir janam
hāribhiḥ
very attractive to the heart
janam
the people in general
hriyamāṇaṁ vicakṣvainaṁ
hriyamāṇam
being carried away
vicakṣva
just see
enam
these
yas te yajña-dhrug aśva-muṭ
yaḥ
one who
te
your
yajña-dhruk
creating a disturbance in the performance of the sacrifice
aśva-muṭ
who stole the horse.
Just see how Indra, the King of heaven, was creating a disturbance in the midst of the sacrifice by stealing the sacrificial horse. These attractive sinful activities he has introduced will be carried out by the people in general.

As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (3.21) :

yad yad ācarati śreṣṭhas tad tad evetaro janaḥ sa yat pramāṇaṁ kurute lokas tad anuvartate

“Whatever action is performed by a great man, common men follow in his footsteps. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues.”

For his own sense gratification, King Indra thought to defeat Mahārāja Pṛthu in the performance of one hundred horse sacrifices. Consequently he stole the horse and hid himself amid so many irreligious personalities, taking on the false guise of a sannyāsī. Such activities are attractive to the people in general; therefore they are dangerous. Lord Brahmā thought that instead of allowing Indra to further introduce such irreligious systems, it would be better to stop the sacrifice. A similar stance was taken by Lord Buddha when people were overly engrossed in the animal sacrifices recommended by Vedic instructions. Lord Buddha had to introduce the religion of nonviolence by contradicting the Vedic sacrificial instructions. Actually, in the sacrifices the slaughtered animals were given a new life, but people without such powers were taking advantage of such Vedic rituals and unnecessarily killing poor animals. Therefore Lord Buddha had to deny the authority of the Vedas for the time being. One should not perform sacrifices that will induce reversed orders. It is better to stop such sacrifices.

As we have repeatedly explained, due to a lack of qualified brahminical priests in Kali-yuga, it is not possible to perform the ritualistic ceremonies recommended in the Vedas. Consequently the śāstras instruct us to perform the saṅkīrtana-yajña. By the saṅkīrtana sacrifice, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, in His form of Lord Caitanya, will be satisfied and worshiped. The entire purpose of performing sacrifices is to worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu. Lord Viṣṇu, or Lord Kṛṣṇa, is present in His form of Lord Caitanya; therefore people who are intelligent should try to satisfy Him by performing saṅkīrtana-yajña. This is the easiest way to satisfy Lord Viṣṇu in this age. People should take advantage of the injunctions in different śāstras concerning sacrifices in this age and not create unnecessary disturbances during the sinful Age of Kali. In Kali-yuga men all over the world are very expert in opening slaughterhouses for killing animals, which they eat. If the old ritualistic ceremonies were observed, people would be encouraged to kill more and more animals. In Calcutta there are many butcher shops which keep a deity of the goddess Kālī, and animal-eaters think it proper to purchase animal flesh from such shops in hope that they are eating the remnants of food offered to the goddess Kālī. They do not know that the goddess Kālī never accepts nonvegetarian food because she is the chaste wife of Lord Śiva. Lord Śiva is also a great Vaiṣṇava and never eats nonvegetarian food, and the goddess Kālī accepts the remnants of food left by Lord Śiva. Therefore there is no possibility of her eating flesh or fish. Such offerings are accepted by the associates of the goddess Kālī known as bhūtas, piśācas and Rākṣasas, and those who take the prasāda of the goddess Kālī in the shape of flesh or fish are not actually taking the prasāda left by the goddess Kālī, but the food left by the bhūtas and piśācas.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
See the people carried away by the attractive heretics created by Indra, who stole the horse and destroyed your sacrifice. This shows the disturbance created by Indra’s stubbornness. Hāribhiḥ means “by those who are attractive.” Indra stole the horse (aśva-muṭ) and that created obstacles to the sacrifice (yajña-dhruk. By that he created pāṣaṇdās.
Just see: Indra's attractive sinful innovations will be followed by the general population — leaders' acts set patterns. Even one act by a high figure can seed a whole social pattern.
Reflection Questions
  • What single act of mine, repeated by those watching, would I be horrified to see scale?
  • Whose 'attractive sinful' innovation am I unwittingly normalizing in my circle?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.37

↗
भवान् परित्रातुमिहावतीर्णो धर्मं जनानां समयानुरूपम् । वेनापचारादवलुप्तमद्य तद्देहतो विष्णुकलासि वैन्य ॥ ३७ ॥
bhavān paritrātum ihāvatīrṇo
[bhavaan paritraatum ihaavateerno]
dharmaṁ janānāṁ samayānurūpam
[dharmam janaanaam samayaanuroopam]
venāpacārād avaluptam adya
[venaapachaaraad avaluptam adya]
tad-dehato viṣṇu-kalāsi vainya
[tad-dehato vishnu-kalaasi vainya]
bhavān — Your Majesty paritrātum — just to deliver iha — in this world avatīrṇaḥ — incarnated dharmam — religious system janānām — of the people in general samaya-anurūpam — according to the time and circumstances vena-apacārāt — by the misdeeds of King Vena avaluptam — almost vanished adya — at the present moment tat — his dehataḥ — from the body viṣṇu — of Lord Viṣṇu kalā — part of a plenary portion asi — you are vainya — O son of King Vena.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhavān paritrātum ihāvatīrṇo
bhavān
Your Majesty
paritrātum
just to deliver
iha
in this world
avatīrṇaḥ
incarnated
dharmaṁ janānāṁ samayānurūpam
dharmam
religious system
janānām
of the people in general
samaya-anurūpam
according to the time and circumstances
venāpacārād avaluptam adya
vena-apacārāt
by the misdeeds of King Vena
avaluptam
almost vanished
adya
at the present moment
tad-dehato viṣṇu-kalāsi vainya
tat
his
dehataḥ
from the body
viṣṇu
of Lord Viṣṇu
kalā
part of a plenary portion
asi
you are
vainya
O son of King Vena.
O King Pṛthu, son of Vena, you are the part-and-parcel expansion of Lord Viṣṇu. Due to the mischievous activities of King Vena, religious principles were almost lost. At that opportune moment you descended as the incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu. Indeed, for the protection of religious principles you have appeared from the body of King Vena.

The way in which Lord Viṣṇu kills the demons and protects the faithful is mentioned in Bhagavad-gītā (4.8) :

paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ vināśāya ca duṣkṛtām dharma-saṁsthāpanārthāya sambhavāmi yuge yuge

“In order to deliver the pious and to annihilate the miscreants, as well as to reestablish the principles of religion, I Myself appear, millennium after millennium.”

In two hands Lord Viṣṇu always carries a club and a cakra to kill demons, and in His other two hands He holds a conchshell and a lotus to give protection to His devotees. When His incarnation is present on this planet or in this universe, the Lord kills the demons and protects His devotees simultaneously. Sometimes Lord Viṣṇu appears in His person as Lord Kṛṣṇa or Lord Rāma. All of these appearances are mentioned in the śāstras. Sometimes He appears as a śaktyāveśa-avatāra like Lord Buddha. As explained before, these śaktyāveśa-avatāras are incarnations of Viṣṇu’s power invested in a living entity. Living entities are also part and parcel of Lord Viṣṇu, but they are not as powerful; therefore when a living entity descends as an incarnation of Viṣṇu, he is especially empowered by the Lord.

When King Pṛthu is described as an incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu, it should be understood that he is a śaktyāveśa-avatāra, part and parcel of Lord Viṣṇu, and is specifically empowered by Him. Any living being acting as the incarnation of Lord Viṣṇu is thus empowered by Lord Viṣṇu to preach the bhakti cult. Such a person can act like Lord Viṣṇu and defeat demons by arguments and preach the bhakti cult exactly according to the principles of śāstra. As indicated in Bhagavad-gītā, whenever we find someone extraordinary preaching the bhakti cult, we should know that he is especially empowered by Lord Viṣṇu, or Lord Kṛṣṇa. As confirmed in Caitanya-caritāmṛta ( Antya 7.11) , kṛṣṇa-śakti vinā nahe tāra pravartana: one cannot explain the glories of the holy name of the Lord without being specifically empowered by Him. If one criticizes or finds fault with such an empowered personality, one is to be considered an offender against Lord Viṣṇu and is punishable. Even though such offenders may dress as Vaiṣṇavas with false tilaka and mālā, they are never forgiven by the Lord if they offend a pure Vaiṣṇava. There are many instances of this in the śāstras.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Pṛthu! You have appeared in this world from Vena’s body as a portion of the Lord to deliver dharma suitable at this time for the people, which has become lost. You should spread dharma not adharma (which will occur if Indra obstructs more sacrifices).
You are a part-and-parcel expansion of Viṣṇu, born from Vena's body to restore dharma. Your origin story may be ugly but your purpose is luminous; both can be true.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I let an ugly origin story occlude my luminous purpose?
  • What is my Vena's-body, and what dharma was I born to restore?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.38

↗
स त्वं विमृश्यास्य भवं प्रजापते सङ्कल्पनं विश्वसृजां पिपीपृहि । ऐन्द्रीं च मायामुपधर्ममातरं प्रचण्डपाखण्डपथं प्रभो जहि ॥ ३८ ॥
sa tvaṁ vimṛśyāsya bhavaṁ prajāpate
[sa tvam vimrishyaasya bhavam prajaapate]
saṅkalpanaṁ viśva-sṛjāṁ pipīpṛhi
[sankalpanam vishva-srijaam pipeeprihi]
aindrīṁ ca māyām upadharma-mātaraṁ
[aindreem cha maayaam upadharma-maataram]
pracaṇḍa-pākhaṇḍa-pathaṁ prabho jahi
[prachanda-paakhanda-patham prabho jahi]
saḥ — the aforesaid tvam — you vimṛśya — considering asya — of the world bhavam — existence prajā-pate — O protector of the people saṅkalpanam — the determination viśva-sṛjām — of the progenitors of the world pipīpṛhi — just fulfill aindrīm — created by the King of heaven ca — also māyām — illusion upadharma — of the irreligious system of so-called sannyāsa mātaram — the mother pracaṇḍa — furious, dangerous pākhaṇḍa-patham — the path of sinful activities prabho — O Lord jahi — please conquer.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa tvaṁ vimṛśyāsya bhavaṁ prajāpate
saḥ
the aforesaid
tvam
you
vimṛśya
considering
asya
of the world
bhavam
existence
prajā-pate
O protector of the people
saṅkalpanaṁ viśva-sṛjāṁ pipīpṛhi
saṅkalpanam
the determination
viśva-sṛjām
of the progenitors of the world
pipīpṛhi
just fulfill
aindrīṁ ca māyām upadharma-mātaraṁ
aindrīm
created by the King of heaven
ca
also
māyām
illusion
upadharma
of the irreligious system of so-called sannyāsa
mātaram
the mother
pracaṇḍa-pākhaṇḍa-pathaṁ prabho jahi
pracaṇḍa
furious, dangerous
pākhaṇḍa-patham
the path of sinful activities
prabho
O Lord
jahi
please conquer.
O protector of the people in general, please consider the purpose of your being incarnated by Lord Viṣṇu. The irreligious principles created by Indra are but mothers of so many unwanted religions. Please therefore stop these imitations immediately.

Lord Brahmā addresses King Pṛthu as prajāpate just to remind him of his great responsibility in maintaining the peace and prosperity of the citizens. Mahārāja Pṛthu was empowered by the Supreme Personality of Godhead for this purpose only. It is the duty of the ideal king to see that people are properly executing religious principles. Lord Brahmā especially requested King Pṛthu to conquer the pseudoreligious principles produced by King Indra. In other words, it is the duty of the state or king to put a stop to pseudoreligious systems produced by unscrupulous persons. Originally a religious principle is one, given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and it comes through the channel of disciplic succession in two forms. Lord Brahmā requested Pṛthu Mahārāja to desist from his unnecessary competition with Indra, who was determined to stop Pṛthu Mahārāja from completing one hundred yajñas. Instead of creating adverse reactions, it was better for Mahārāja Pṛthu to stop the yajñas in the interest of his original purpose as an incarnation. This purpose was to establish good government and set things in the right order.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Master of the people! Considering the auspiciousness of the world, complete the vow of the progenitors and destroy the illusion which generates imitation dharma, created by Indra--the path of the formidable heretics. O master of the progeny! Think of the auspiciousness (bhavam) of the world. The progenitors created you by churning the arm of Vena. Fulfill their desire. Pipīpṛhi, instead of puraya is poetic license. This path of formidable heretics, created by Indra produces (mātaram) upadharma. Patham is masculine though mātaram is feminine, since it has a fixed gender.
Indra's irreligious principles are mothers of many unwanted religions; stop the imitations immediately. Bad religious innovations multiply unless cut at the source; act early.
Reflection Questions
  • Which bad religious innovation in my era is birthing many small distortions?
  • Where could I cut a bad pattern early before it spawns its lineage?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.39

↗
मैत्रेय उवाच इत्थं स लोकगुरुणा समादिष्टो विशाम्पति: । तथा च कृत्वा वात्सल्यं मघोनापि च सन्दधे ॥ ३९ ॥
maitreya uvāca
[maitreya uvaacha]
itthaṁ sa loka-guruṇā
[ittham sa loka-gurunaa]
samādiṣṭo viśāmpatiḥ
[samaadishto vishaampatih]
tathā ca kṛtvā vātsalyaṁ
[tathaa cha kritvaa vaatsalyam]
maghonāpi ca sandadhe
[maghonaapi cha sandadhe]
maitreyaḥ uvāca — the great sage Maitreya continued to speak ittham — thus saḥ — King Pṛthu loka-guruṇā — by the original teacher of all people, Lord Brahmā samādiṣṭaḥ — being advised viśām-patiḥ — the king, master of the people tathā — in that way ca — also kṛtvā — having done vātsalyam — affection maghonā — with Indra api — even ca — also sandadhe — concluded peace.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maitreya uvāca
maitreyaḥ uvāca
the great sage Maitreya continued to speak
itthaṁ sa loka-guruṇā
ittham
thus
saḥ
King Pṛthu
loka-guruṇā
by the original teacher of all people, Lord Brahmā
samādiṣṭo viśāmpatiḥ
samādiṣṭaḥ
being advised
viśām-patiḥ
the king, master of the people
tathā ca kṛtvā vātsalyaṁ
tathā
in that way
ca
also
kṛtvā
having done
vātsalyam
affection
maghonāpi ca sandadhe
maghonā
with Indra
api
even
ca
also
sandadhe
concluded peace.
The great sage Maitreya continued: When King Pṛthu was thus advised by the supreme teacher, Lord Brahmā, he abandoned his eagerness to perform yajñas and with great affection concluded a peace with King Indra.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Maitreya said: Instructed thus by the guru of the universe, Pṛthu, the King, made peace with Indra, showing him affection. Ca means certainly. According to the instruction of Brahmā, he showed affection to Indra. Though Indra was elder and was King of the devatās, by the order of Brahmā, Pṛthu showed affection. They were equal, since they both are viśuddha-sattva, but Brahmā saw that Pṛthu was superior because of his superior bhakti, and thus instructed him to show affection to Indra. Sandadhe means “they made peace.”
Advised by Brahmā, Pṛthu abandoned his yajña-eagerness and made affectionate peace with Indra. The king's strength shows in his willingness to be advised; greatness is teachable.
Reflection Questions
  • When was I last advised by a true elder and changed course because of it?
  • Where am I currently resistant to advice that would make me peace with a rival?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.40

↗
कृतावभृथस्‍नानाय पृथवे भूरिकर्मणे वरान्ददुस्ते वरदा ये तद्बर्हिषि तर्पिता: ॥ ४० ॥
kṛtāvabhṛtha-snānāya
[kritaavabhritha-snaanaaya]
pṛthave bhūri-karmaṇe
[prithave bhoori-karmane]
varān dadus te varadā
[varaan dadus te varadaa]
ye tad-barhiṣi tarpitāḥ
[ye tad-barhishi tarpitaah]
kṛta — having performed avabhṛtha-snānāya — taking a bath after the sacrifice pṛthave — unto King Pṛthu bhūri-karmaṇe — famous for performing many virtuous acts varān — benedictions daduḥ — gave te — all of them vara-dāḥ — the demigods, bestowers of benedictions ye — who tat-barhiṣi — in the performance of such a yajña tarpitāḥ — became pleased.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛtāvabhṛtha-snānāya
kṛta
having performed
avabhṛtha-snānāya
taking a bath after the sacrifice
pṛthave bhūri-karmaṇe
pṛthave
unto King Pṛthu
bhūri-karmaṇe
famous for performing many virtuous acts
varān dadus te varadā
varān
benedictions
daduḥ
gave
te
all of them
vara-dāḥ
the demigods, bestowers of benedictions
ye tad-barhiṣi tarpitāḥ
ye
who
tat-barhiṣi
in the performance of such a yajña
tarpitāḥ
became pleased.
After this, Pṛthu Mahārāja took his bath, which is customarily taken after the performance of a yajña, and received the benedictions and due blessings of the demigods, who were very pleased by his glorious activities.

Yajña means Lord Viṣṇu, for all yajña is meant to please the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Viṣṇu. Since the demigods automatically become very pleased with the performance of sacrifice, they bestow benediction upon the executors of yajñas. When one pours water on the root of a tree, the branches, trunk, twigs, flowers and leaves are all satisfied. Similarly, when one gives food to the stomach, all parts of the body are rejuvenated. In the same way, if one simply satisfies Lord Viṣṇu by the performance of yajña, one satisfies all the demigods automatically. In turn, the demigods offer their benedictions to such a devotee. A pure devotee therefore does not ask benedictions directly from the demigods. His only business is to serve the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus he is never in need of those things supplied by the demigods.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The bestowers of benedictions, pleased with the sacrifice, gave blessings to Pṛthu, performer of great acts, after he had taken his avabhṛtha bath.
Pṛthu took his post-yajña bath; the demigods, pleased, gave him blessings. The right ritual close of an effort matters; clean exits attract blessing.
Reflection Questions
  • Which effort of mine needs a proper ritual close that I've been skipping?
  • What blessing am I waiting for that requires my own bath first?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.41

↗
विप्रा: सत्याशिषस्तुष्टा: श्रद्धया लब्धदक्षिणा: । आशिषो युयुजु: क्षत्तरादिराजाय सत्कृता: ॥ ४१ ॥
viprāḥ satyāśiṣas tuṣṭāḥ
[vipraah satyaashishas tushtaah]
śraddhayā labdha-dakṣiṇāḥ
[shraddhayaa labdha-dakshinaah]
āśiṣo yuyujuḥ kṣattar
[aashisho yuyujuh kshattar]
ādi-rājāya sat-kṛtāḥ
[aadi-raajaaya sat-kritaah]
viprāḥ — all the brāhmaṇas satya — true āśiṣaḥ — whose benedictions tuṣṭāḥ — being very satisfied śraddhayā — with great respect labdha-dakṣiṇāḥ — who obtained rewards āśiṣaḥ — benedictions yuyujuḥ — offered kṣattaḥ — O Vidura ādi-rājāya — upon the original king sat-kṛtāḥ — being honored.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
viprāḥ satyāśiṣas tuṣṭāḥ
viprāḥ
all the brāhmaṇas
satya
true
āśiṣaḥ
whose benedictions
tuṣṭāḥ
being very satisfied
śraddhayā labdha-dakṣiṇāḥ
śraddhayā
with great respect
labdha-dakṣiṇāḥ
who obtained rewards
āśiṣo yuyujuḥ kṣattar
āśiṣaḥ
benedictions
yuyujuḥ
offered
kṣattaḥ
O Vidura
ādi-rājāya sat-kṛtāḥ
ādi-rājāya
upon the original king
sat-kṛtāḥ
being honored.
With great respect, the original king, Pṛthu, offered all kinds of rewards to the brāhmaṇas present at the sacrifice. Since all these brāhmaṇas were very much satisfied, they gave their heartfelt blessings to the King.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O Vidura! The brāhmaṇas, whose blessings come true, and who were satisfied, having been worshipped and given donations with faith, gave blessings to the original King.
Pṛthu offered rewards to the brāhmaṇas; satisfied, they blessed him heartily. Pay your team well; the blessings that follow are worth more than the cost.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose service to me have I underpaid, materially or emotionally?
  • Where could generous reward unlock heartfelt blessing that I haven't yet received?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 4.19.42

↗
त्वयाहूता महाबाहो सर्व एव समागता: । पूजिता दानमानाभ्यां पितृदेवर्षिमानवा: ॥ ४२ ॥
tvayāhūtā mahā-bāho
[tvayaahootaa mahaa-baaho]
sarva eva samāgatāḥ
[sarva eva samaagataah]
pūjitā dāna-mānābhyāṁ
[poojitaa daana-maanaabhyaam]
pitṛ-devarṣi-mānavāḥ
[pitri-devarshi-maanavaah]
tvayā — by you āhūtāḥ — were invited mahā-bāho — O great mighty-armed one sarve — all eva — certainly samāgatāḥ — assembled pūjitāḥ — were honored dāna — by charity mānābhyām — and by respect pitṛ — the inhabitants of Pitṛloka deva — demigods ṛṣi — great sages mānavāḥ — as well as common men.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvayāhūtā mahā-bāho
tvayā
by you
āhūtāḥ
were invited
mahā-bāho
O great mighty-armed one
sarva eva samāgatāḥ
sarve
all
eva
certainly
samāgatāḥ
assembled
pūjitā dāna-mānābhyāṁ
pūjitāḥ
were honored
dāna
by charity
mānābhyām
and by respect
pitṛ-devarṣi-mānavāḥ
pitṛ
the inhabitants of Pitṛloka
deva
demigods
ṛṣi
great sages
mānavāḥ
as well as common men.
All the great sages and brāhmaṇas said: O mighty King, by your invitation all classes of living entities have attended this assembly. They have come from Pitṛloka and the heavenly planets, and great sages as well as common men have attended this meeting. Now all of them are very much satisfied by your dealings and your charity towards them.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Fourth Canto, Nineteenth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “King Pṛthu’s One Hundred Horse Sacrifices.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O mighty-armed King! All these who have assembled--the Pitṛs, sages among the devatās and men, called by you--have been worshipped with charity and respect. The satisfied brāhmaṇas speak this verse. Thus ends the commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter of the Fourth Canto of the Bhāgavatam for the pleasure of the devotees, in accordance with the previous ācāryas. Chapter Twenty The Lord Instructs Pṛthu 4.20: Lord Viṣṇu's Appearance in the Sacrificial Arena of Mahārāja Pṛthu 20. Lord Viṣṇu's Appearance in the Sacrificial Arena of Mahārāja Pṛthu
All classes attended — pitṛs, demigods, sages, common men — and were satisfied by your dealings. The measure of a great gathering is that beings from many orders leave actually pleased.
Reflection Questions
  • Which order of being do my events typically fail to please?
  • What dealings could I shift so every class of attendee leaves satisfied?
📝 My note