FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

2.3 · Pure Devotional Service: The Change in Heart

20 verses · 🖨 Class prep
C Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (12270 chars)

C - Connect (1-3) The temporary world is created as an opportunity for the living entity to go back to Godhead. Different systems of yoga (which literally means ‘to connect’) are established in the material universes as the means to revive our original spiritual consciousness. Such yoga processes progressively help one reestablish their loving attachment to Krishna. To attract the attention of the varied transcendentalists present, Sukadeva Goswami described a variety of yoga processes. He concluded, however, by establishing that the most advanced and powerful connection is achieved via devotional service (bhakti-yoga, or the yoga of love).

Previous C.U.T Next Disconnect to Connect Last updated 1 year ago

C - Connect (1-3)

C - Connect (1-3) The temporary world is created as an opportunity for the living entity to go back to Godhead. Different systems of yoga (which literally means ‘to connect’) are established in the material universes as the means to revive our original spiritual consciousness. Such yoga processes progressively help one reestablish their loving attachment to Krishna. To attract the attention of the varied transcendentalists present, Sukadeva Goswami described a variety of yoga processes. He concluded, however, by establishing that the most advanced and powerful connection is achieved via devotional service (bhakti-yoga, or the yoga of love).

Previous C.U.T Next Disconnect to Connect Last updated 1 year ago

Bhakti: The Ultimate Connection

C - Connect (1-3) Bhakti: The Ultimate Connection Chapter 2, 3 Bhakti , the process of engaging one’s senses in the loving service of the Supreme Lord, is described in more detail: the ears and tongue are fashioned to hear and chant about the Lord, the head should bow down before the Lord, one’s hands can be utilised in serving the Lord, the eyes should constantly see the Lord and the legs can transport one to the holy places. On the other hand, a body that has not been blessed with the sacred foot dust of the pure devotee is spiritually dead, and the heart that does not melt in ecstasy whilst chanting is considered steel-framed. The conclusion: one who fully engages their senses in sincere devotional service will find their entire consciousness being transformed.

Previous Connection Processes Next Live Connection Last updated 1 year ago

Connection Processes

C - Connect (1-3) Connection Processes Chapter 1, 2, 3 Conscious of the diverse transcendentalists who had assembled, Sukadeva Goswami described various processes of connection: worshipping the Universal Form of the Lord, meditation on the Supersoul in the heart, the process of demigod worship, and devotional service to the Supreme Lord. Looking externally, an attached yogi can meditate on the entire material manifestation as the personal body of the Lord. By doing this, one fixes their mind on the Supreme, rises above material vision and perception, and advances towards the practice of devotional service. [ 6 ] A more advanced yogi looks internally and connects with the Supersoul. Sukadeva Goswami thus described the Lord in the heart, and how, through meditation, one’s mind and intelligence can be fully focused on the Supersoul. In such consciousness, there is complete unity of desire with the Lord and one remains guided by Him in all times, places and circumstances. [ 7 ] Sukadeva Goswami also described how others approach influential controllers within the universe for various benefits. This is known as the process of demigod worship. [ 8 ] In conclusion, Sukadeva Goswami emphatically established that those who have broader intelligence will render devotional service (bhakti-yoga) to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, regardless of the desires they harbour, since all benedictions are ultimately bestowed by Krishna. Bhakti-yoga is the culmination of all spiritual practice. Brahma, the exalted engineer of the universe who was personally tutored by the Lord, studied the Vedas three times and also came to this conclusion.

Previous Disconnect to Connect Next Bhakti: The Ultimate Connection Last updated 1 year ago

Disconnect to Connect

C - Connect (1-3) Disconnect to Connect Chapter 1 Suta Goswami begins narrating the conversation between Maharaja Pariksit and Sukadeva Goswami. In the unique gathering of distinguished saints and sages, Maharaja Pariksit posed the most intelligent question: “O trustworthy brahmanas, I now ask you about my immediate duty. Please, after proper deliberation, tell me of the unalloyed duty of everyone in all circumstances, and specifically of those who are just about to die.” ( SB 1.19.24 ) After exposing those who squander their valuable time in material preoccupation, Sukadeva Goswami established remembrance of the Lord at the time of death as the perfection of life. This is the ‘bottom line.’ Thus, for a person nearing death, which could be any one of us, serious immersion in hearing and chanting about Krishna is essential. Such devotional practice will help one connect with the Lord, fix their mind on Him, and think of Him at the crucial moment, cutting off all other attachments. Bhakti-yoga connects us to the spiritual and very naturally disconnects us from the material. This is possible for everyone, regardless of their situation. Sukadeva Goswami reassured Maharaja Pariksit that he had sufficient time to perfect his life, citing the story of Khatvanga Maharaja, who achieved the perfect death in a matter of moments.

Previous C - Connect (1-3) Next Connection Processes Last updated 1 year ago

Live Connection

C - Connect (1-3) Live Connection “Devotional service, or direct bhakti-yoga , is the only absolute and auspicious means of deliverance from the grip of material existence. There are many indirect methods for deliverance from the clutches of material existence, but none of them is as easy and auspicious as bhakti-yoga . The means of jnana and yoga and other allied disciplines are not independent in delivering a performer. Such activities help one to reach the stage of bhakti-yoga after many, many years.” ( SB 2.2.33 )

Previous Bhakti: The Ultimate Connection Next The Nature of God Last updated 1 year ago

Investing in a Relationship

C - Connect (1-3) Live Connection Investing in a Relationship From every angle of vision, bhakti-yoga is the most lucrative investment one can make in life. Material investments always fall short of our expectations. Oftentimes, the promises of material pleasure fail to manifest, and even when they do, the experience is limited, temporary and tied together with undesirable tag-ons. Thus, we look towards the spiritual alternatives for better prospects. Amongst the various disciplines of spiritual connection, there is a progressive yoga ladder, upon which bhakti-yoga is considered the peak practice. Why so? Return – What is the return? What’s in it for me? Bhakti-yoga gives one the most powerful and intimate connection with God, allowing one to experience the unparalleled joy of a personal relationship with the Divine. Imagine someone was to describe a cake to you. You could ascertain something by hearing about it, seeing it, touching it and smelling it. Only by employing the tongue to taste it, however, would you truly appreciate its speciality. In the same way, bhakti-yoga allows one to fully experience the higher taste of pure love of God, unattainable through any other means. Rate – When will I get it? How long will it take? Various yoga processes require long periods of time to perfect. Bhakti-yoga , on the other hand, gives one spiritual elevation at an incredibly swift rate. Sukadeva Goswami offers the example of Maharaja Khatvanga, who attained that perfection in a moment. Success and progress in bhakti-yoga is simply dependent upon the seriousness and sincerity of the practitioner. Compare walking up a staircase to taking the express elevator. Not only do you reach the top, but you do so with maximum efficiency. Reachable – Is it a complicated process? Do I have to follow a host of rules and regulations? Practicing bhakti-yoga doesn’t require a super-intellect, capacity for austerity, piety from previous lives, or any other material qualification. It is an offering from the heart that is open to everyone and anyone, regardless of age, gender, caste, creed or qualification. The various accounts in the Srimad- Bhagavatam show the incredible variety of personalities that attain perfection in bhakti-yoga , despite seeming disadvantages in material qualification. Reappear – Have I missed my opportunity? Is it too late? Bhakti-yoga can be adopted and perfected at any time in life. Opportunities will keep reappearing. Sukadeva Goswami was purified in the womb, Dhruva Maharaja in his youth, Dhritarastra in his old age, and Ajamila on the brink of death. Due to the open opportunity of bhakti-yoga , at any point in life the living entity has the power to say “This is not how the story is going to end.” Bhakti-yoga is the ever-present ‘get-out-clause’ which helps one to escape material attachment and reawaken their love for Krishna. Reliable – Is there any risk involved? What if I don’t perfect it? The effects of any endeavours in bhakti-yoga remain with the living entity life after life. If we progress 2% on the journey, in the next life we begin from the point of 2%. There is no futility in this endeavour – every act renders permanent benefit. Furthermore, since the practice is so joyful and natural, even if it somehow emerges as a fabrication, we still have nothing to regret. Srila Prabhupada, whose life was completely dedicated to Krishna in all respects, was once challenged: “What if Krishna doesn’t exist?” Prabhupada unhesitatingly replied that he wouldn’t have lost anything, because if life is ultimately a mad race for immediate enjoyment, then the process of Krishna consciousness simultaneously provided him the most pleasurable life in the here and now. The Srimad-Bhagavatam goes on to unequivocally establish that bhakti-yoga is not simply the practice that we adopt for progress, but also the perfection that we seek. Pure devotees are even ready to reject liberation ( moksa ) if it fails to grant them an opportunity for devotional service (SB 3.29.13). Bhakti is thus consistently celebrated as the Srimad-Bhagavatam’s highest value and the ultimate goal of life.

Previous The Nature of God Next U - Universal Creation (4-7) Last updated 1 year ago

The Nature of God

C - Connect (1-3) Live Connection The Nature of God After lifetimes of frustrated attempts at finding happiness in this material world, the living entity, eternal, full of knowledge and bliss, begins a serious search for the Absolute Truth. Since eternality is so integral to our nature, we naturally look for that in this material world. This brings us to the sat (eternality) aspect of the Absolute Truth, known as the impersonal Brahman . Later, the searcher realises that the Absolute Truth must also be sentient, having the capacity to oversee and direct the entirety of the cosmos. This brings one to the cit (knowledge) aspect of the Absolute Truth, known as Paramatma or Supersoul, who keeps the affairs of material creation ticking like clockwork. Finally, one wonders what that Supreme being does in Their own abode, separate from this temporary world. This brings one to the understanding of the ananda (bliss) aspect of the Absolute Truth, known as Bhagavan , who fully manifests the name, fame, form and qualities of God. At this stage, one understands that separate from controlling material nature, the Supreme Lord also has His own intimate personal life in the spiritual world. Jiva Goswami thus explains that perception of Absolute Truth can be of different degrees. When we perceive the Absolute Truth without potency , this is Brahman realisation. When we perceive the Absolute Truth with material potencies , this is Paramatma realisation. When we perceive the Absolute Truth with material and spiritual potencies this is Bhagavan realisation. That is the most complete understanding. The natural question that follows is how we re-establish our relationship with that Supreme Person.

Previous Live Connection Next Investing in a Relationship Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.1

↗
श्री शुक उवाच एवमेतन्निगदितं पृष्टवान् यद्भवान् मम । नृणां यन्म्रियमाणानां मनुष्येषु मनीषिणाम् ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
evam etan nigaditaṁ
[evam etan nigaditam]
pṛṣṭavān yad bhavān mama
[prishtavaan yad bhavaan mama]
nṛṇāṁ yan mriyamāṇānāṁ
[nrinaam yan mriyamaanaanaam]
manuṣyeṣu manīṣiṇām
[manushyeshu maneeshinaam]
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca — Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said evam — so etat — all these nigaditam — answered pṛṣṭavān — as you inquired yat — what bhavān — your good self mama — unto me nṛṇām — of the human being yat — one mriyamāṇānām — on the threshold of death manuṣyeṣu — amongst the human beings manīṣiṇām — of the intelligent men.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī-śukaḥ uvāca
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
evam etan nigaditaṁ
evam
so
etat
all these
nigaditam
answered
pṛṣṭavān yad bhavān mama
pṛṣṭavān
as you inquired
yat
what
bhavān
your good self
mama
unto me
nṛṇāṁ yan mriyamāṇānāṁ
nṛṇām
of the human being
yat
one
mriyamāṇānām
on the threshold of death
manuṣyeṣu manīṣiṇām
manuṣyeṣu
amongst the human beings
manīṣiṇām
of the intelligent men.
Śrī Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Mahārāja Parīkṣit, as you have inquired from me as to the duty of the intelligent man who is on the threshold of death, so I have answered you.

In human society all over the world there are millions and billions of men and women, and almost all of them are less intelligent because they have very little knowledge of spirit soul. Almost all of them have a wrong conception of life, for they identify themselves with the gross and subtle material bodies, which they are not, in fact. They may be situated in different high and low positions in the estimation of human society, but one should know definitely that unless one inquires about his own self beyond the body and the mind, all his activities in human life are total failures. Therefore out of thousands and thousands of men, one may inquire about his spirit self and thus consult the revealed scriptures like Vedānta-sūtras, Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. But in spite of reading and hearing such scriptures, unless one is in touch with a realized spiritual master, he cannot actually realize the real nature of self, etc. And out of thousands and hundreds of thousands of men, someone may know what Lord Kṛṣṇa is in fact. In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta ( Madhya 20.122-123) it is said that Lord Kṛṣṇa, out of His causeless mercy, prepared the Vedic literatures in the incarnation of Vyāsadeva for reading by the intelligent class of men in a human society which is almost totally forgetful of the genuine relation with Kṛṣṇa. Even such an intelligent class of men may be forgetful in their relation with the Lord. The whole bhakti-yoga process is therefore a revival of the lost relation. This revival is possible in the human form of life, which is obtained only out of the evolutionary cycle of 8,400,000 species of life. The intelligent class of human being must take a serious note of this opportunity. Not all human beings are intelligent, so the importance of human life is not always understood. Therefore manīṣiṇām, meaning “thoughtful,” is particularly used here. A manīṣiṇām person, like Mahārāja Parīkṣit, must therefore take to the lotus feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa and fully engage himself in devotional service — hearing, chanting, etc., of the holy name and pastimes of the Lord, which are all hari-kathāmṛta. This action is especially recommended when one is preparing for death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva said: In response to your question about the activities of a dying man, I have explained the two paths according to yoga, and for those who are intelligent among men and dying, I have explained the path of bhakti.
Commentary

In the Third Chapter it is explained that the results of worshipping devatās is insignificant and that senses are useless without being employed in bhakti to the Lord.

What you asked about duties of the dying person I have explained in terms of the two paths for the yogī. Among those person, from those who are wise and dying, such as you, I have described the process of hearing, glorifying and remembering the sweet pastimes of the Lord.

Out of millions, few inquire about the soul; out of those, few find a realized teacher; out of those, very few truly know Kṛṣṇa. To be even on the threshold of such inquiry is already grace — don't waste it.
Reflection Questions
  • How often does my mind actually ask 'who am I beyond the body?' versus other questions?
  • Am I positioning myself among the few who get serious, or coasting with the many who don't?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.2-7

↗
ब्रह्मवर्चसकामस्तु यजेत ब्रह्मण: पतिम् । इन्द्रमिन्द्रियकामस्तु प्रजाकाम: प्रजापतीन् ॥ २ ॥ देवीं मायां तु श्रीकामस्तेजस्कामो विभावसुम् । वसुकामो वसून रुद्रान् वीर्यकामोऽथ वीर्यवान् ॥ ३ ॥ अन्नाद्यकामस्त्वदितिं स्वर्गकामोऽदिते:सुतान् । विश्वान्देवान् राज्यकाम: साध्यान्संसाधको विशाम् ॥ ४ ॥ आयुष्कामोऽश्विनौ देवौ पुष्टिकाम इलां यजेत् । प्रतिष्ठाकाम: पुरुषो रोदसी लोकमातरौ ॥ ५ ॥ रूपाभिकामो गन्धर्वान् स्त्रीकामोऽप्सर उर्वशीम् । आधिपत्यकाम: सर्वेषां यजेत परमेष्ठिनम् ॥ ६ ॥ यज्ञं यजेद् यशस्काम: कोशकाम: प्रचेतसम् । विद्याकामस्तु गिरिशं दाम्पत्यार्थ उमां सतीम् ॥ ७ ॥
brahma-varcasa-kāmas tu
[brahma-varchasa-kaamas tu]
yajeta brahmaṇaḥ patim
[yajeta brahmanah patim]
indram indriya-kāmas tu
[indram indriya-kaamas tu]
prajā-kāmaḥ prajāpatīn
[prajaa-kaamah prajaapateen]
devīṁ māyāṁ tu śrī-kāmas
[deveem maayaam tu shree-kaamas]
tejas-kāmo vibhāvasum
[tejas-kaamo vibhaavasum]
vasu-kāmo vasūn rudrān
[vasu-kaamo vasoon rudraan]
vīrya-kāmo ’tha vīryavān
[veerya-kaamo ’tha veeryavaan]
annādya-kāmas tv aditiṁ
[annaadya-kaamas tv aditim]
svarga-kāmo ’diteḥ sutān
[svarga-kaamo ’diteh sutaan]
viśvān devān rājya-kāmaḥ
[vishvaan devaan raajya-kaamah]
sādhyān saṁsādhako viśām
[saadhyaan samsaadhako vishaam]
āyuṣ-kāmo ’śvinau devau
[aayush-kaamo ’shvinau devau]
puṣṭi-kāma ilāṁ yajet
[pushti-kaama ilaam yajet]
pratiṣṭhā-kāmaḥ puruṣo
[pratishthaa-kaamah purusho]
rodasī loka-mātarau
[rodasee loka-maatarau]
rūpābhikāmo gandharvān
[roopaabhikaamo gandharvaan]
strī-kāmo ’psara urvaśīm
[stree-kaamo ’psara urvasheem]
ādhipatya-kāmaḥ sarveṣāṁ
[aadhipatya-kaamah sarveshaam]
yajeta parameṣṭhinam
[yajeta parameshthinam]
yajñaṁ yajed yaśas-kāmaḥ
[yajnam yajed yashas-kaamah]
kośa-kāmaḥ pracetasam
[kosha-kaamah prachetasam]
vidyā-kāmas tu giriśaṁ
[vidyaa-kaamas tu girisham]
dāmpatyārtha umāṁ satīm
[daampatyaartha umaam sateem]
brahma — the absolute varcasa — effulgence kāmaḥ tu — but one who desires in that way yajeta — do worship brahmaṇaḥ — of the Vedas patim — the master indram — the King of heaven indriya-kāmaḥ tu — but one who desires strong sense organs prajā-kāmaḥ — one who desires many offspring prajāpatīn — the Prajāpatis devīm — the goddess māyām — unto the mistress of the material world tu — but śrī-kāmaḥ — one who desires beauty tejaḥ — power kāmaḥ — one who so desires vibhāvasum — the fire-god vasu-kāmaḥ — one who wants wealth vasūn — the Vasu demigods rudrān — the Rudra expansions of Lord Śiva vīrya-kāmaḥ — one who wants to be very strongly built atha — therefore vīryavān — the most powerful anna-adya — grains kāmaḥ — one who so desires tu — but aditim — Aditi, mother of the demigods svarga — heaven kāmaḥ — so desiring aditeḥ sutān — the sons of Aditi viśvān — Viśvadeva devān — demigods rājya-kāmaḥ — those who hanker for kingdoms sādhyān — the Sādhya demigods saṁsādhakaḥ — what fulfills the wishes viśām — of the mercantile community āyuḥ-kāmaḥ — desirous of long life aśvinau — the two demigods known as the Aśvinī brothers devau — the two demigods puṣṭi-kāmaḥ — one who desires a strongly built body ilām — the earth yajet — must worship pratiṣṭhā-kāmaḥ — one who desires good fame, or stability in a post puruṣaḥ — such men rodasī — the horizon loka-mātarau — and the earth rūpa — beauty abhikāmaḥ — positively aspiring for gandharvān — the residents of the Gandharva planet, who are very beautiful and are expert in singing strī-kāmaḥ — one who desires a good wife apsaraḥ urvaśīm — the society girls of the heavenly kingdom ādhipatya-kāmaḥ — one who desires to dominate others sarveṣām — everyone yajeta — must worship parameṣṭhinam — Brahmā, the head of the universe yajñam — the Personality of Godhead yajet — must worship yaśaḥ-kāmaḥ — one who desires to be famous kośa-kāmaḥ — one who desires a good bank balance pracetasam — the treasurer of heaven, known as Varuṇa vidyā-kāmaḥ tu — but one who desires education giriśam — the lord of the Himalayas, Lord Śiva dāmpatya-arthaḥ — and for conjugal love umām satīm — the chaste wife of Lord Śiva, known as Umā.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
brahma-varcasa-kāmas tu
brahma
the absolute
varcasa
effulgence
kāmaḥ tu
but one who desires in that way
yajeta brahmaṇaḥ patim
yajeta
do worship
brahmaṇaḥ
of the Vedas
patim
the master
indram indriya-kāmas tu
indram
the King of heaven
indriya-kāmaḥ tu
but one who desires strong sense organs
prajā-kāmaḥ prajāpatīn
prajā-kāmaḥ
one who desires many offspring
prajāpatīn
the Prajāpatis
devīṁ māyāṁ tu śrī-kāmas
devīm
the goddess
māyām
unto the mistress of the material world
tu
but
śrī-kāmaḥ
one who desires beauty
tejas-kāmo vibhāvasum
tejaḥ
power
kāmaḥ
one who so desires
vibhāvasum
the fire-god
vasu-kāmo vasūn rudrān
vasu-kāmaḥ
one who wants wealth
vasūn
the Vasu demigods
rudrān
the Rudra expansions of Lord Śiva
vīrya-kāmo ’tha vīryavān
vīrya-kāmaḥ
one who wants to be very strongly built
annādya-kāmas tv aditiṁ
svarga-kāmo ’diteḥ sutān
viśvān devān rājya-kāmaḥ
sādhyān saṁsādhako viśām
āyuṣ-kāmo ’śvinau devau
puṣṭi-kāma ilāṁ yajet
pratiṣṭhā-kāmaḥ puruṣo
atha
therefore
rodasī loka-mātarau
rūpābhikāmo gandharvān
strī-kāmo ’psara urvaśīm
ādhipatya-kāmaḥ sarveṣāṁ
yajeta parameṣṭhinam
yajñaṁ yajed yaśas-kāmaḥ
kośa-kāmaḥ pracetasam
vidyā-kāmas tu giriśaṁ
vīryavān
the most powerful
anna-adya
grains
kāmaḥ
one who so desires
tu
but
aditim
Aditi, mother of the demigods
svarga
heaven
kāmaḥ
so desiring
aditeḥ sutān
the sons of Aditi
viśvān
Viśvadeva
devān
demigods
rājya-kāmaḥ
those who hanker for kingdoms
sādhyān
the Sādhya demigods
dāmpatyārtha umāṁ satīm
saṁsādhakaḥ
what fulfills the wishes
viśām
of the mercantile community
āyuḥ-kāmaḥ
desirous of long life
aśvinau
the two demigods known as the Aśvinī brothers
devau
the two demigods
puṣṭi-kāmaḥ
one who desires a strongly built body
ilām
the earth
yajet
must worship
pratiṣṭhā-kāmaḥ
one who desires good fame, or stability in a post
puruṣaḥ
such men
rodasī
the horizon
loka-mātarau
and the earth
rūpa
beauty
abhikāmaḥ
positively aspiring for
gandharvān
the residents of the Gandharva planet, who are very beautiful and are expert in singing
strī-kāmaḥ
one who desires a good wife
apsaraḥ urvaśīm
the society girls of the heavenly kingdom
ādhipatya-kāmaḥ
one who desires to dominate others
sarveṣām
everyone
yajeta
must worship
parameṣṭhinam
Brahmā, the head of the universe
yajñam
the Personality of Godhead
yajet
must worship
yaśaḥ-kāmaḥ
one who desires to be famous
kośa-kāmaḥ
one who desires a good bank balance
pracetasam
the treasurer of heaven, known as Varuṇa
vidyā-kāmaḥ tu
but one who desires education
giriśam
the lord of the Himalayas, Lord Śiva
dāmpatya-arthaḥ
and for conjugal love
umām satīm
the chaste wife of Lord Śiva, known as Umā.
One who desires to be absorbed in the impersonal brahmajyoti effulgence should worship the master of the Vedas [Lord Brahmā or Bṛhaspati, the learned priest], one who desires powerful sex should worship the heavenly King, Indra, and one who desires good progeny should worship the great progenitors called the Prajāpatis. One who desires good fortune should worship Durgādevī, the superintendent of the material world. One desiring to be very powerful should worship fire, and one who aspires only after money should worship the Vasus. One should worship the Rudra incarnations of Lord Śiva if he wants to be a great hero. One who wants a large stock of grains should worship Aditi. One who desires to attain the heavenly planets should worship the sons of Aditi. One who desires a worldly kingdom should worship Viśvadeva, and one who wants to be popular with the general mass of population should worship the Sādhya demigod. One who desires a long span of life should worship the demigods known as the Aśvinī-kumāras, and a person desiring a strongly built body should worship the earth. One who desires stability in his post should worship the horizon and the earth combined. One who desires to be beautiful should worship the beautiful residents of the Gandharva planet, and one who desires a good wife should worship the Apsarās and the Urvaśī society girls of the heavenly kingdom. One who desires domination over others should worship Lord Brahmā, the head of the universe. One who desires tangible fame should worship the Personality of Godhead, and one who desires a good bank balance should worship the demigod Varuṇa. If one desires to be a greatly learned man he should worship Lord Śiva, and if one desires a good marital relation he should worship the chaste goddess Umā, the wife of Lord Śiva.

There are different modes of worship for different persons desiring success in particular subjects. The conditioned soul living within the purview of the material world cannot be an expert in every type of materially enjoyable asset, but one can have considerable influence over a particular matter by worshiping a particular demigod, as mentioned above. Rāvaṇa was made a very powerful man by worshiping Lord Śiva, and he used to offer severed heads to please Lord Śiva. He became so powerful by the grace of Lord Śiva that all the demigods were afraid of him, until he at last challenged the Personality of Godhead Śrī Rāmacandra and thus ruined himself. In other words, all such persons who aspire after gaining some or all of the material objects of enjoyment, or the gross materialistic persons, are on the whole less intelligent, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.20) . It is said there that those who are bereft of all good sense, or those whose intelligence is withdrawn by the deluding energy of māyā, aspire to achieve all sorts of material enjoyment in life by pleasing the various demigods, or by advancing in material civilization under the heading of scientific progress. The real problem of life in the material world is to solve the question of birth, death, old age and disease. No one wants to change his birthright, no one wants to meet death, no one wants to be old or invalid, and no one wants diseases. But these problems are solved neither by the grace of any demigod nor by the so-called advancement of material science. In the Bhagavad-gītā, as well as in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, such less intelligent persons have been described as devoid of all good sense. Śukadeva Gosvāmī said that out of the 8,400,000 species of living entities, the human form of life is rare and valuable, and out of those rare human beings those who are conscious of the material problems are rarer still, and the still more rare persons are those who are conscious of the value of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which contains the messages of the Lord and His pure devotees. Death is inevitable for everyone, intelligent or foolish. But Parīkṣit Mahārāja has been addressed by the Gosvāmī as the manīṣī, or the man of highly developed mind, because at the time of death he left all material enjoyment and completely surrendered unto the lotus feet of the Lord by hearing His messages from the right person, Śukadeva Gosvāmī. But aspirations for material enjoyment by endeavoring persons are condemned. Such aspirations are something like the intoxication of the degraded human society. Intelligent persons should try to avoid these aspirations and seek instead the permanent life by returning home, back to Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The person who desires the knowledge of Brahmā should worship Brahmā, the master of the Vedas. The person who desires strong senses should worship Indra. The person desiring progeny should worship the Prajāpati such as Dakṣa.
Commentary

Now hear the activities for those who are not intelligent among men. Or this section can be said to be supplied as an explanation of who should be worshipped, by first showing the deities whom the foolish worship. This description continues until verse 9. Brahmaṇaḥ patim means “the master of the Vedas.” The Prajāpatis are the sons of Brahmā such as Dakṣa.

Almost every material desire has a corresponding demigod to worship — power, wealth, beauty, fame, fertility. The verse lists the menu not to recommend it, but to expose how endless and oddly specific the catalog of materialism really is.
Reflection Questions
  • Which item on this menu still tempts me — and which 'demigod' (figure, system, brand) am I quietly worshipping for it?
  • What would my devotional life look like if I stopped placing those side orders?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.8

↗
धर्मार्थ उत्तमश्लोकं तन्तु: तन्वन् पितृन् यजेत् । रक्षाकाम: पुण्यजनानोजस्कामो मरुद्गणान् ॥ ८ ॥
dharmārtha uttama-ślokaṁ
[dharmaartha uttama-shlokam]
tantuḥ tanvan pitṝn yajet
[tantuh tanvan pitreen yajet]
rakṣā-kāmaḥ puṇya-janān
[rakshaa-kaamah punya-janaan]
ojas-kāmo marud-gaṇān
[ojas-kaamo marud-ganaan]
dharma-arthaḥ — for spiritual advancement uttama-ślokam — the Supreme Lord or persons attached to the Supreme Lord tantuḥ — for offspring tanvan — and for their protection pitṝn — the residents of Pitṛloka yajet — must worship rakṣā-kāmaḥ — one who desires protection puṇya-janān — pious persons ojaḥ-kāmaḥ — one who desires strength should worship marut-gaṇān — the demigods.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dharmārtha uttama-ślokaṁ
dharma-arthaḥ
for spiritual advancement
uttama-ślokam
the Supreme Lord or persons attached to the Supreme Lord
tantuḥ tanvan pitṝn yajet
tantuḥ
for offspring
tanvan
and for their protection
pitṝn
the residents of Pitṛloka
yajet
must worship
rakṣā-kāmaḥ puṇya-janān
rakṣā-kāmaḥ
one who desires protection
puṇya-janān
pious persons
ojas-kāmo marud-gaṇān
ojaḥ-kāmaḥ
one who desires strength should worship
marut-gaṇān
the demigods.
One should worship Lord Viṣṇu or His devotee for spiritual advancement in knowledge, and for protection of heredity and advancement of a dynasty one should worship the various demigods.

The path of religion entails making progress on the path of spiritual advancement, ultimately reviving the eternal relation with Lord Viṣṇu in His impersonal effulgence, His localized Paramātmā feature, and ultimately His personal feature by spiritual advancement in knowledge. And one who wants to establish a good dynasty and be happy in the progress of temporary bodily relations should take shelter of the Pitās and the demigods in other pious planets. Such different classes of worshipers of different demigods may ultimately reach the respective planets of those demigods within the universe, but he who reaches the spiritual planets in the brahmajyoti achieves the highest perfection.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The person desiring dharma should worship Dharma. The person desiring many descendents should worship the Pitṛs. The person desiring protection should worship the Yakṣas. The person desiring strong senses should worship the Maruts.
Commentary

Uttamaḥ-ślokam means Dharma. Tantuḥ tanvan means desiring increase of descendents. Puṇya-janān means the Yakṣas. The Maruts are devatās.

Worship Viṣṇu or His devotee for spiritual advancement; everything else, including dynasty and worldly stability, gets you what it gets you — temporary planets and temporary bodies.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life am I currently 'worshipping' that, at best, only delivers dynasty and stability?
  • Where could I redirect that energy toward Viṣṇu or His devotees?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.9

↗
राज्यकामो मनून् देवान् निऋर्तिं त्वभिचरन् यजेत् । कामकामो यजेत् सोममकाम: पुरुषं परम् ॥ ९ ॥
rājya-kāmo manūn devān
[raajya-kaamo manoon devaan]
nirṛtiṁ tv abhicaran yajet
[nirritim tv abhicharan yajet]
kāma-kāmo yajet somam
[kaama-kaamo yajet somam]
akāmaḥ puruṣaṁ param
[akaamah purusham param]
rājya-kāmaḥ — anyone desiring an empire or kingdom manūn — the Manus, semi-incarnations of God devān — demigods nirṛtim — demons tu — but abhicaran — desiring victory over the enemy yajet — should worship kāma-kāmaḥ — one who desires sense gratification yajet — should worship somam — the demigod named Candra akāmaḥ — one who has no material desires to be fulfilled puruṣam — the Supreme Personality of Godhead param — the Supreme.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājya-kāmo manūn devān
rājya-kāmaḥ
anyone desiring an empire or kingdom
manūn
the Manus, semi-incarnations of God
devān
demigods
nirṛtiṁ tv abhicaran yajet
nirṛtim
demons
tu
but
abhicaran
desiring victory over the enemy
yajet
should worship
kāma-kāmo yajet somam
kāma-kāmaḥ
one who desires sense gratification
yajet
should worship
somam
the demigod named Candra
akāmaḥ puruṣaṁ param
akāmaḥ
one who has no material desires to be fulfilled
puruṣam
the Supreme Personality of Godhead
param
the Supreme.
One who desires domination over a kingdom or an empire should worship the Manus. One who desires victory over an enemy should worship the demons, and one who desires sense gratification should worship the moon. But one who desires nothing of material enjoyment should worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

For a liberated person, all the enjoyments listed above are considered to be absolutely useless. Only those who are conditioned by the material modes of external energy are captivated by different types of material enjoyment. In other words, the transcendentalist has no material desires to be fulfilled, whereas the materialist has all types of desires to be fulfilled. The Lord has proclaimed that the materialists, who desire material enjoyment and thus seek the favor of different demigods, as above mentioned, are not in control of their senses and so give themselves to nonsense. One should therefore not desire any sort of material enjoyment, being sensible enough to worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The leaders of nonsensical persons are still more nonsensical because they preach openly and foolishly that one can worship any form of demigod and get the same result. This sort of preaching is not only against the teachings of the Bhagavad-gītā, or those of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, but is also foolish, just as it is foolish to claim that with the purchase of any travel ticket one may reach the same destination. No one can reach Bombay from Delhi by purchasing a ticket for Baroda. It is clearly defined herein that persons impregnated with different desires have different modes of worship, but one who has no desire for material enjoyment should worship the Supreme Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Personality of Godhead. And this worshiping process is called devotional service. Pure devotional service means service to the Lord without any tinge of material desires, including desire for fruitive activity and empiric speculation. For fulfillment of material desires one may worship the Supreme Lord, but the result of such worship is different, as will be explained in the next verse. Generally the Lord does not fulfill anyone’s material desires for sense enjoyment, but He awards such benedictions to worshipers of the Lord, for they ultimately come to the point of not desiring material enjoyment. The conclusion is that one must minimize the desires for material enjoyment, and for this one should worship the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is described here as param, or beyond anything material. Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has also stated, nārāyaṇaḥ paro ’vyaktāt: the Supreme Lord is beyond the material encirclement.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The person desiring to be a king should worship the Manus. The person desiring to kill enemies should worship Nirṛti, a Rākṣasa. The person desiring sense gratification should worship Soma. The person desiring to destroy all material desires should worship the Supreme Lord.
Commentary

Rājya means “desire to be a king.” This is distinguished from desiring a kingdom for which one worships the Viśva-devas mentioned in verse 4. Manūn refers to the Manus who protect the Manvantaras (seventy-one yuga cycles each). Abhicaran means killing enemies. Nirṛtim is a Rākṣasa. Kāma-kāmaḥ means desiring sense gratification. Having mentioned the activities of the foolish people, Śukadeva then mentions the activity of the intelligent person. The person desiring to destroy all material desires (akāmaḥ) should worship the supreme person, Bhagavān.

Whatever you want — kingdom, victory, sense pleasure — has its appropriate object of worship. But the one who wants nothing material should worship the Supreme Lord directly. Wanting less is itself a qualification for the highest worship.
Reflection Questions
  • Where is my list of wants quietly setting the agenda for who I worship?
  • What would my devotion look like if I subtracted material requests from it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.10

↗
अकाम: सर्वकामो वा मोक्षकाम उदारधी: । तीव्रेण भक्तियोगेन यजेत पुरुषं परम् ॥ १० ॥
akāmaḥ sarva-kāmo vā
[akaamah sarva-kaamo vaa]
mokṣa-kāma udāra-dhīḥ
[moksha-kaama udaara-dheeh]
tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena
[teevrena bhakti-yogena]
yajeta puruṣaṁ param
[yajeta purusham param]
akāmaḥ — one who has transcended all material desires sarva-kāmaḥ — one who has the sum total of material desires vā — either mokṣa-kāmaḥ — one who desires liberation udāra-dhīḥ — with broader intelligence tīvreṇa — with great force bhakti-yogena — by devotional service to the Lord yajeta — should worship puruṣam — the Lord param — the supreme whole.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
akāmaḥ sarva-kāmo vā
akāmaḥ
one who has transcended all material desires
sarva-kāmaḥ
one who has the sum total of material desires
vā
either
mokṣa-kāma udāra-dhīḥ
mokṣa-kāmaḥ
one who desires liberation
udāra-dhīḥ
with broader intelligence
tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena
tīvreṇa
with great force
bhakti-yogena
by devotional service to the Lord
yajeta puruṣaṁ param
yajeta
should worship
puruṣam
the Lord
param
the supreme whole.
A person who has broader intelligence, whether he be full of all material desire, without any material desire, or desiring liberation, must by all means worship the supreme whole, the Personality of Godhead.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is described in the Bhagavad-gītā as puruṣottama, or the Supreme Personality. It is He only who can award liberation to the impersonalists by absorbing such aspirants in the brahmajyoti, the bodily rays of the Lord. The brahmajyoti is not separate from the Lord, as the glowing sun ray is not independent of the sun disc. Therefore one who desires to merge into the supreme impersonal brahmajyoti must also worship the Lord by bhakti-yoga, as recommended here in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Bhakti-yoga is especially stressed here as the means of all perfection. In the previous chapters it has been stated that bhakti-yoga is the ultimate goal of both karma-yoga and jñāna-yoga, and in the same way in this chapter it is emphatically declared that bhakti-yoga is the ultimate goal of the different varieties of worship of the different demigods. Bhakti-yoga, thus being the supreme means of self-realization, is recommended here. Everyone must therefore seriously take up the methods of bhakti-yoga, even though one aspires for material enjoyment or liberation from material bondage.

Akāmaḥ is one who has no material desire. A living being, naturally being the part and parcel of the supreme whole puruṣaṁ pūrṇam, has as his natural function to serve the Supreme Being, just as the parts and parcels of the body, or the limbs of the body, are naturally meant to serve the complete body. Desireless means, therefore, not to be inert like the stone, but to be conscious of one’s actual position and thus desire satisfaction only from the Supreme Lord. Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has explained this desirelessness as bhajanīya-parama-puruṣa-sukha-mātra-sva-sukhatvam in his Sandarbha. This means that one should feel happy only by experiencing the happiness of the Supreme Lord. This intuition of the living being is sometimes manifested even during the conditioned stage of a living being in the material world, and such intuition is expressed in the manner of altruism, philanthropy, socialism, communism, etc., by the undeveloped minds of less intelligent persons. In the mundane field such an outlook of doing good to others in the form of society, community, family, country or humanity is a partial manifestation of the same original feeling in which a pure living entity feels happiness by the happiness of the Supreme Lord. Such superb feelings were exhibited by the damsels of Vrajabhūmi for the happiness of the Lord. The gopīs loved the Lord without any return, and this is the perfect exhibition of the akāmaḥ spirit. Kāma spirit, or the desire for one’s own satisfaction, is fully exhibited in the material world, whereas the spirit of akāmaḥ is fully exhibited in the spiritual world.

Thoughts of becoming one with the Lord, or being merged in the brahmajyoti, can also be exhibitions of kāma spirit if they are desires for one’s own satisfaction to be free from the material miseries. A pure devotee does not want liberation so that he may be relieved from the miseries of life. Even without so-called liberation, a pure devotee is aspirant for the satisfaction of the Lord. Influenced by the kāma spirit, Arjuna declined to fight in the Kurukṣetra battlefield because he wanted to save his relatives for his own satisfaction. But being a pure devotee, he agreed to fight on the instruction of the Lord because he came to his senses and realized that satisfaction of the Lord at the cost of his own satisfaction was his prime duty. Thus he became akāma. That is the perfect stage of a perfect living being.

Udāra-dhīḥ means one who has a broader outlook. People with desires for material enjoyment worship small demigods, and such intelligence is condemned in the Bhagavad-gītā (7.20) as hṛta-jñāna, the intelligence of one who has lost his senses. One cannot obtain any result from demigods without getting sanction from the Supreme Lord. Therefore a person with a broader outlook can see that the ultimate authority is the Lord, even for material benefits. Under the circumstances, one with a broader outlook, even with the desire for material enjoyment or for liberation, should take to the worship of the Lord directly. And everyone, whether an akāma or sakāma or mokṣa-kāma, should worship the Lord with great expedience. This implies that bhakti-yoga may be perfectly administered without any mixture of karma and jñāna. As the unmixed sun ray is very forceful and is therefore called tīvra, similarly unmixed bhakti-yoga of hearing, chanting, etc., may be performed by one and all regardless of inner motive.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The person desiring destruction of all desires, the person with all desires, and even the person with an intense desire for liberation, if he has good intelligence, will worship the Supreme Lord with pure bhakti.
Commentary

Not only those persons who have a desire to destroy all material desires should worship the Supreme Lord, but also those with all desires and those with no desires should worship Bhagavān. According to Śrīdhara Svāmī, akāmaḥ means a pure devotee. Jīva Gosvāmī in his Sandarbha says that akāmaḥ means a person whose only happiness is the happiness of the Supreme Lord. The word sarva-kāma includes all desires in general. Mokṣa-kāma is mentioned separately in order to cut down peoples’ thought that they are without desire (since they desire liberation). Or the word can indicate than the person desiring liberation is even more filled with desire than the person desiring material comforts, since it follows directly after the word sarva-kāmaḥ. The word kāma itself indicates a desire to destroy suffering and attain happiness. Those desires are shown to be stronger in the jñānis engaged in destroying the suffering of their saṁsāra and anxious for the experience of the happiness of brahman than in the karmīs who desire to destroy temporary suffering and gain temporary happiness of Svarga by worshipping devatās. But the devotees are engaged only in giving happiness to their worshippable Lord. The word niṣkāma is applicable to them. This is understood from their statements:

nātha yoni-sahasreṣu yeṣu yeṣu vrajāmy aham | teṣu teṣv acyutā bhaktir acyutāstu sadā tvayi || Wherever I may wander, O master, among thousands of species of life, in each situation may I have firmly fixed devotion to you, O Acyuta. Viṣṇu Purāṇa

sva-karma-phala-nirdiṣṭāṁ yāṁ yāṁ yoniṁ vrajāmy aham | tasyāṁ tasyāṁ hṛṣīkeśa tvayi bhaktir dṛḍhāstu me || May I have firm devotion to you in whatever birth I take allotted by my karmas.

tan naḥ samādiśopāyaṁ yena te caraṇābjayoḥ | smṛtir yathā na viramed api saṁsaratām iha ||

Please tell us how we may constantly remember your lotus feet, though we continue in the cycle of birth and death in this world. SB 10.73.15

King Parīkṣit also said, as he began his fast:

punaś ca bhūyād bhagavaty anante ratiḥ prasaṅgaś ca tad-āśrayeṣu | mahatsu yāṁ yām upayāmi sṛṣṭiṁ maitry astu sarvatra namo dvijebhyaḥ ||

On the other hand, in whatever birth I receive, may I have rati for the unlimited Lord, excellent association with his devotees who take shelter of him and friendship with all living beings! I offer respects to the brāhmaṇas. SB 1.19.16

Udāra-dhīḥ means very intelligent. To make Bhagavān the subject of one\s devotion whether it is without desires or with desires is a sign of good intelligence. Not worshipping the Lord is a sign of foolish intelligence. That bhakti should be strong (tīvreṇa), without the mixture of jñāna or karma, like the rays of the sun unmixed with clouds.

Related verses
Whether you are full of desires, empty of them, or seeking liberation, the broader intelligence chooses to worship the Supreme Person. He alone can grant every kind of result, including impersonal merging.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I limited bhakti to one category — wanting nothing, or wanting liberation — and missed its universality?
  • What would 'broader intelligence' look like in how I orient my practice?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.11

↗
एतावानेव यजतामिह नि:श्रेयसोदय: । भगवत्यचलो भावो यद् भागवतसंगत: ॥ ११ ॥
etāvān eva yajatām
[etaavaan eva yajataam]
iha niḥśreyasodayaḥ
[iha nihshreyasodayah]
bhagavaty acalo bhāvo
[bhagavaty achalo bhaavo]
yad bhāgavata-saṅgataḥ
[yad bhaagavata-sangatah]
etāvān — all these different kinds of worshipers eva — certainly yajatām — while worshiping iha — in this life niḥśreyasa — the highest benediction udayaḥ — development bhagavati — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead acalaḥ — unflinching bhāvaḥ — spontaneous attraction yat — which bhāgavata — the pure devotee of the Lord saṅgataḥ — association.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etāvān eva yajatām
etāvān
all these different kinds of worshipers
eva
certainly
yajatām
while worshiping
iha niḥśreyasodayaḥ
iha
in this life
niḥśreyasa
the highest benediction
udayaḥ
development
bhagavaty acalo bhāvo
bhagavati
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead
acalaḥ
unflinching
bhāvaḥ
spontaneous attraction
yad bhāgavata-saṅgataḥ
yat
which
bhāgavata
the pure devotee of the Lord
saṅgataḥ
association.
All the different kinds of worshipers of multidemigods can attain the highest perfectional benediction, which is spontaneous attraction unflinchingly fixed upon the Supreme Personality of Godhead, only by the association of the pure devotee of the Lord.

All living entities in different statuses of life within the material creation, beginning from the first demigod, Brahmā, down to the small ant, are conditioned under the law of material nature, or the external energy of the Supreme Lord. The living entity in his pure state is conscious of the fact that he is a part and parcel of the Lord, but when he is thrown into the material world on account of his desire to lord it over material energy, he becomes conditioned by the three modes of material nature and thus struggles for existence for the highest benefit. This struggle for existence is something like following the will-o’-the-wisp under the spell of material enjoyment. All plans for material enjoyment, either by worship of different demigods as described in the previous verses of this chapter or by modernized advancement of scientific knowledge without the help of God or demigod, are illusory only, for despite all such plans for happiness, the conditioned living being within the compass of material creation can never solve the problems of life, namely birth, death, old age and disease. The history of the universe is full of such planmakers, and many kings and emperors come and go, leaving a planmaking story only. But the prime problems of life remain unsolved despite all endeavors by such planmakers.

Actually human life is meant for making a solution to the problems of life. One can never solve such problems by satisfying the different demigods, by different modes of worship, or by so-called scientific advancement in knowledge without the help of God or the demigods. Apart from the gross materialists, who care very little either for God or for the demigods, the Vedas recommend worship of different demigods for different benefits, and so the demigods are neither false nor imaginary. The demigods are as factual as we are, but they are much more powerful due to their being engaged in the direct service of the Lord in managing different departments in the universal government. The Bhagavad-gītā affirms this, and the different planets of the demigods are mentioned there, including the one of the supreme demigod, Lord Brahmā. The gross materialists do not believe in the existence of God or the demigods. Nor do they believe that different planets are dominated by different demigods. They are creating a great commotion about reaching the closest celestial body, Candraloka, or the moon, but even after much mechanical research they have only very scanty information of this moon, and in spite of much false advertisement for selling land on the moon, the puffed-up scientists or gross materialists cannot live there, and what to speak of reaching the other planets, which they are unable even to count. However, the followers of the Vedas have a different method of acquiring knowledge. They accept the statements of the Vedic literatures as authority in toto, as we have already discussed in Canto One, and therefore they have full and reasonable knowledge of God and demigods and of their different residential planets situated within the compass of the material world and beyond the limit of the material sky. The most authentic Vedic literature, accepted by the great Indian ācāryas like Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, Madhva, Viṣṇusvāmī, Nimbārka and Caitanya and studied by all important personalities of the world, is the Bhagavad-gītā, in which the worship of the demigods and their respective residential planets are mentioned. The Bhagavad-gītā (9.25) affirms:

yānti deva-vratā devān pitṝn yānti pitṛ-vratāḥ bhūtāni yānti bhūtejyā yānti mad-yājino ’pi mām

“The worshipers of demigods reach the respective planets of the demigods, and the worshipers of forefathers reach the planets of the forefathers. The gross materialist remains in the different material planets, but the devotees of the Lord reach the kingdom of God.”

We also have information from the Bhagavad-gītā that all the planets within the material world, including Brahmaloka, are but temporarily situated, and after a fixed period they are all annihilated. Therefore the demigods and their followers are all annihilated at the period of devastation, but one who reaches the kingdom of God gets a permanent share in eternal life. That is the verdict of Vedic literature. The worshipers of the demigods have one facility more than the unbelievers due to their being convinced of the Vedic version, by which they can get information of the benefit of worshiping the Supreme Lord in the association of the devotees of the Lord. The gross materialist, however, without any faith in the Vedic version, remains eternally in darkness, driven by a false conviction on the basis of imperfect experimental knowledge, or so-called material science, which can never reach into the realm of transcendental knowledge.

Therefore unless the gross materialists or the worshipers of the temporary demigods come in contact with a transcendentalist like the pure devotee of the Lord, their attempts are simply a waste of energy. Only by the grace of the divine personalities, the pure devotees of the Lord, can one achieve pure devotion, which is the highest perfection of human life. Only a pure devotee of the Lord can show one the right way of progressive life. Otherwise both the materialistic way of life, without any information of God or the demigods, and the life engaged in the worship of demigods, in pursuit of temporary material enjoyments, are different phases of phantasmagoria. They are nicely explained in the Bhagavad-gītā also, but the Bhagavad-gītā can be understood in the association of pure devotees only, and not by the interpretations of politicians or dry philosophical speculators.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Auspiciousness arises for the worshippers of devatās if firm devotion for the Lord arises from association with devotees.
Commentary

After the worshippers of various devatās have their desires fulfilled what goal do they achieve? Nothing. But if they receive mercy of devotees then they attain bhakti. The worshippers of devatās (yajatām) will attain the highest good (niḥśreyasoḍayaḥ), if (yad) an attitude of service (bhāvaḥ) to the Lord arises because of association with devotees. Otherwise no good arises, because the devatās cannot bestow the highest good. The Lord says:

ye ’py anya-devatā-bhaktā yajante śraddhayānvitāḥ | te ’pi mām eva kaunteya yajanty avidhi-pūrvakam || ahaṁ hi sarva-yajñānāṁ bhoktā ca prabhur eva ca | na tu mām abhijānanti tattvenātaś cyavanti te ||

Those who are devoted to other gods and with faith worship them--they also worship me, but by the wrong method, O son of Kuntī.

I am the enjoyer and master of all sacrifices. Those who do not know me in truth fall down. BG 9.23-24

Worship of the devatās is not a cause of developing bhakti to the Lord at all. Association with devotees is the only method. That association is unpredictable as explained before.

Related verses
Even worshippers of many demigods can be lifted into spontaneous fixed attraction to the Supreme — but only through association with a pure devotee. The shortcut around scattered worship is the company we keep.
Reflection Questions
  • Who are the pure devotees in my life — or those I am avoiding when offered?
  • What scattered worship in me could resolve into fixed attraction through real sādhu-saṅga?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.12

↗
ज्ञानं यदाप्रतिनिवृत्तगुणोर्मिचक्र - मात्मप्रसाद उत यत्र गुणेष्वसङ्ग: । कैवल्यसम्मतपथस्त्वथ भक्तियोग: को निर्वृतो हरिकथासु रतिं न कुर्यात् ॥ १२ ॥
jñānaṁ yad āpratinivṛtta-guṇormi-cakram
[jnaanam yad aapratinivritta-gunormi-chakram]
ātma-prasāda uta yatra guṇeṣv asaṅgaḥ
[aatma-prasaada uta yatra guneshv asangah]
kaivalya-sammata-pathas tv atha bhakti-yogaḥ
[kaivalya-sammata-pathas tv atha bhakti-yogah]
ko nirvṛto hari-kathāsu ratiṁ na kuryāt
[ko nirvrito hari-kathaasu ratim na kuryaat]
jñānam — knowledge yat — that which ā — up to the limit of pratinivṛtta — completely withdrawn guṇa-ūrmi — the waves of the material modes cakram — whirlpool ātma-prasādaḥ — self-satisfaction uta — moreover yatra — where there is guṇeṣu — in the modes of nature asaṅgaḥ — no attachment kaivalya — transcendental sammata — approved pathaḥ — path tu — but atha — therefore bhakti-yogaḥ — devotional service kaḥ — who nirvṛtaḥ — absorbed in hari-kathāsu — in the transcendental topics of the Lord ratim — attraction na — shall not kuryāt — do.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jñānaṁ yad āpratinivṛtta-guṇormi-cakram
jñānam
knowledge
yat
that which
ā
up to the limit of
pratinivṛtta
completely withdrawn
guṇa-ūrmi
the waves of the material modes
cakram
whirlpool
ātma-prasāda uta yatra guṇeṣv asaṅgaḥ
ātma-prasādaḥ
self-satisfaction
uta
moreover
yatra
where there is
guṇeṣu
in the modes of nature
asaṅgaḥ
no attachment
kaivalya-sammata-pathas tv atha bhakti-yogaḥ
kaivalya
transcendental
sammata
approved
pathaḥ
path
tu
but
atha
therefore
bhakti-yogaḥ
devotional service
ko nirvṛto hari-kathāsu ratiṁ na kuryāt
kaḥ
who
nirvṛtaḥ
absorbed in
hari-kathāsu
in the transcendental topics of the Lord
ratim
attraction
na
shall not
kuryāt
do.
Transcendental knowledge in relation with the Supreme Lord Hari is knowledge resulting in the complete suspension of the waves and whirlpools of the material modes. Such knowledge is self-satisfying due to its being free from material attachment, and being transcendental it is approved by authorities. Who could fail to be attracted?

According to Bhagavad-gītā (10.9) the characteristics of pure devotees are wonderful. The complete functional activities of a pure devotee are always engaged in the service of the Lord, and thus the pure devotees exchange feelings of ecstasy between themselves and relish transcendental bliss. This transcendental bliss is experienced even in the stage of devotional practice ( sādhana-avasthā ), if properly undertaken under the guidance of a bona fide spiritual master. And in the mature stage the developed transcendental feeling culminates in realization of the particular relationship with the Lord by which a living entity is originally constituted (up to the relationship of conjugal love with the Lord, which is estimated to be the highest transcendental bliss). Thus bhakti-yoga, being the only means of God realization, is called kaivalya. Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī quotes the Vedic version ( eko nārāyaṇo devaḥ, parāvarāṇāṁ parama āste kaivalya-saṁjñitaḥ ) in this connection and establishes that Nārāyaṇa, the Personality of Godhead, is known as kaivalya, and the means which enables one to approach the Lord is called the kaivalya-panthā, or the only means of attainment of Godhead. This kaivalya-panthā begins from śravaṇa, or hearing those topics that relate to the Personality of Godhead, and the natural consequence of hearing such hari-kathā is attainment of transcendental knowledge, which causes detachment from all mundane topics, for which a devotee has no taste at all. For a devotee, all mundane activities, social and political, become unattractive, and in the mature state such a devotee becomes uninterested even in his own body, and what to speak of bodily relatives. In such a state of affairs one is not agitated by the waves of the material modes. There are different modes of material nature, and all mundane functions in which a common man is very much interested or in which he takes part become unattractive for the devotee. This state of affairs is described herein as pratinivṛtta-guṇormi, and it is possible by ātma-prasāda, or complete self-satisfaction without any material connection. The first-class devotee of the Lord attains this stage by devotional service, but despite his loftiness, for the Lord’s satisfaction he may play the voluntary part of a preacher of the Lord’s glory and dovetail all into devotional service, even mundane interest, just to give the neophytes a chance to transform mundane interest into transcendental bliss. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has described this action of a pure devotee as nirbandhaḥ kṛṣṇa-sambandhe yuktaṁ vairāgyam ucyate. Even mundane activities dovetailed with service to the Lord are also calculated to be transcendental or approved kaivalya affairs.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
If jñāna, the path approved for attaining the Lord, which creates indifference to the multitude of material guṇas, arises and is followed by satisfaction of the self, which creates complete detachment from the guṇas, then bhakti-yoga should arise. Experiencing bliss in bhakti, how can that person not have attraction for topics of the Lord?
Commentary

“It is improper take shelter of one deity at the end of life after taking shelter of someone else for one’s whole life. How can it be proper to make the person who has always worshipped some devatā develop devotion to the Lord at the end?”

Such worshippers of devatās are actually very low, because even the worshippers of brahman take to the worship of the Lord. The progression is shown in this verse.

When (yad) there arises jñāna, which destroys the multitude of whirlpools of the guṇas, which brings satisfaction of the self, by which there is detachment from material enjoyment, and which is the path approved for merging, then bhakti-yoga arises.

One should not worry that one cannot attain association of devotees since that mercy is spontaneous, as explained previously. By the mercy of the Lord, Sanaka and others attained bhakti. By the mercy of devotees, persons such as Śukadeva attained bhakti through kīrtana and other processes. Who absorbed in the happiness of bhakti (nirvṛtaḥ) would not have attachment (ratim) for topics of the Lord? This means that the person without attachment for the topics of the Lord is not happy at all. Here the superiority of pure bhakti to karma, jñāna, yoga and worship of devatās is shown. And whatever they aim to achieve in those processes is accomplished by bhakti alone. And for all those persons practicing various methods, the highest result (prema) is finally attained by only bhakti. Thus pure bhakti which disregards karma and jñāna, without any of those desires, whose principle activities are hearing, glorifying and remembering the Lord, is the method of producing prema. This is the opinion of Śukadeva. Among those methods, chanting the name of the Lord is the supreme method. Thus five items (karma, jñāna, yoga, bhakti and prema) have been delineated. This is the meaning of the section in summary.

Transcendental knowledge of Hari quiets the waves of the modes. It is self-satisfying because it carries no material attachment — and once tasted, who could fail to be drawn?
Reflection Questions
  • What waves in my inner sea are loudest today — and what knowledge could still them?
  • Where have I tasted hari-kathā enough to know its pull, and where am I still avoiding the taste?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.13

↗
शौनक उवाच इत्यभिव्याहृतं राजा निशम्य भरतर्षभ: । किमन्यत्पृष्टवान् भूयो वैयासकिमृषिं कविम् ॥ १३ ॥
śaunaka uvāca
[shaunaka uvaacha]
ity abhivyāhṛtaṁ rājā
[ity abhivyaahritam raajaa]
niśamya bharatarṣabhaḥ
[nishamya bharatarshabhah]
kim anyat pṛṣṭavān bhūyo
[kim anyat prishtavaan bhooyo]
vaiyāsakim ṛṣiṁ kavim
[vaiyaasakim rishim kavim]
śaunakaḥ uvāca — Śaunaka said iti — thus abhivyāhṛtam — all that was spoken rājā — the King niśamya — by hearing bharata-ṛṣabhaḥ — Mahārāja Parīkṣit kim — what anyat — more pṛṣṭavān — did he inquire from him bhūyaḥ — again vaiyāsakim — unto the son of Vyāsadeva ṛṣim — one who is well versed kavim — poetic.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śaunaka uvāca
śaunakaḥ uvāca
Śaunaka said
ity abhivyāhṛtaṁ rājā
iti
thus
abhivyāhṛtam
all that was spoken
rājā
the King
niśamya bharatarṣabhaḥ
niśamya
by hearing
bharata-ṛṣabhaḥ
Mahārāja Parīkṣit
kim anyat pṛṣṭavān bhūyo
kim
what
anyat
more
pṛṣṭavān
did he inquire from him
bhūyaḥ
again
vaiyāsakim ṛṣiṁ kavim
vaiyāsakim
unto the son of Vyāsadeva
ṛṣim
one who is well versed
kavim
poetic.
Śaunaka said: The son of Vyāsadeva, Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī, was a highly learned sage and was able to describe things in a poetic manner. What did Mahārāja Parīkṣit again inquire from him after hearing all that he had said?

A pure devotee of the Lord automatically develops all godly qualities, and some of the prominent features of those qualities are as follows: he is kind, peaceful, truthful, equable, faultless, magnanimous, mild, clean, nonpossessive, a well-wisher to all, satisfied, surrendered to Kṛṣṇa, without hankering, simple, fixed, self-controlled, a balanced eater, sane, mannerly, prideless, grave, sympathetic, friendly, poetic, expert and silent. Out of these twenty-six prominent features of a devotee, as described by Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja in his Caitanya-caritāmṛta, the qualification of being poetic is especially mentioned herein in relation to Śukadeva Gosvāmī. The presentation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam by his recitation is the highest poetic contribution. He was a self-realized learned sage. In other words, he was a poet amongst the sages.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śaunaka said: Hearing the explanations, what else did the King, best of the Bharata lineage, ask the wise sage Śukadeva?
Commentary

In saying this he expresses wonder, since all the questions were answered properly. Ṛṣim means he who sees the supreme brahman. Kavim means that among the sages he the most expert at describing the Lord.

Śukadeva is praised for being able to describe things in a poetic manner. Spiritual depth is not lost in beauty — the most learned sage was also the most poetic. Truth and grace travel together.
Reflection Questions
  • Do I associate spirituality with dryness, or have I let it become poetic in my own life?
  • Where could I bring more beauty to how I speak, write, or teach what I have learned?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.14

↗
एतच्छुश्रूषतां विद्वन् सूत नोऽर्हसि भाषितुम् । कथा हरिकथोदर्का: सतां स्यु: सदसि ध्रुवम् ॥ १४ ॥
etac chuśrūṣatāṁ vidvan
[etach chushrooshataam vidvan]
sūta no ’rhasi bhāṣitum
[soota no ’rhasi bhaashitum]
kathā hari-kathodarkāḥ
[kathaa hari-kathodarkaah]
satāṁ syuḥ sadasi dhruvam
[sataam syuh sadasi dhruvam]
etat — this śuśrūṣatām — of those eager to hear vidvan — O learned sūta — Sūta Gosvāmī naḥ — unto us arhasi — may you do it bhāṣitum — just to explain it kathāḥ — topics hari-kathā-udarkāḥ — result in the topics of the Lord satām — of the devotees syuḥ — may be sadasi — in the assembly of dhruvam — certainly.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
etac chuśrūṣatāṁ vidvan
etat
this
sūta no ’rhasi bhāṣitum
śuśrūṣatām
of those eager to hear
vidvan
O learned
sūta
Sūta Gosvāmī
naḥ
unto us
kathā hari-kathodarkāḥ
arhasi
may you do it
bhāṣitum
just to explain it
kathāḥ
topics
hari-kathā-udarkāḥ
result in the topics of the Lord
satāṁ syuḥ sadasi dhruvam
satām
of the devotees
syuḥ
may be
sadasi
in the assembly of
dhruvam
certainly.
O learned Sūta Gosvāmī! Please continue to explain such topics to us because we are all eager to hear. Besides that, topics which result in the discussion of the Lord Hari should certainly be discussed in the assembly of devotees.

As we have already quoted above from the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu of Rūpa Gosvāmī, even mundane things, if dovetailed in the service of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, are accepted as transcendental. For example, the epics or the histories of Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata, which are specifically recommended for the less intelligent classes (women, śūdras and unworthy sons of the higher castes), are also accepted as Vedic literature because they are compiled in connection with the activities of the Lord. Mahābhārata is accepted as the fifth division of the Vedas after its first four divisions, namely Sāma, Yajur, Ṛg and Atharva. The less intelligent do not accept Mahābhārata as part of the Vedas, but great sages and authorities accept it as the fifth division of the Vedas. Bhagavad-gītā is also part of the Mahābhārata, and it is full of the Lord’s instruction for the less intelligent class of men. Some less intelligent men say that Bhagavad-gītā is not meant for householders, but such foolish men forget that Bhagavad-gītā was explained to Arjuna, a gṛhastha (family man), and spoken by the Lord in His role as a gṛhastha. So Bhagavad-gītā, although containing the high philosophy of the Vedic wisdom, is for the beginners in the transcendental science, and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is for graduates and postgraduates in the transcendental science. Therefore literatures like Mahābhārata, the Purāṇas and similar other literatures which are full of the pastimes of the Lord, are all transcendental literatures, and they should be discussed with full confidence in the society of great devotees.

The difficulty is that such literatures, when discussed by professional men, appear to be mundane literature like histories or epics because there are so many historical facts and figures. It is said here, therefore, that such literatures should be discussed in the assembly of devotees. Unless they are discussed by devotees, such literatures cannot be relished by the higher class of men. So the conclusion is that the Lord is not impersonal in the ultimate issue. He is the Supreme Person, and He has His different activities. He is the leader of all living entities, and He descends at His will and by His personal energy to reclaim the fallen souls. Thus He plays exactly like the social, political or religious leaders. Because such roles ultimately culminate in the discussion of topics of the Lord, all such preliminary topics are also transcendental. That is the way of spiritualizing the civic activities of human society. Men have inclinations for studying history and many other mundane literatures — stories, fiction, dramas, magazines, newspapers, etc. — so let them be dovetailed with the transcendental service of the Lord, and all of them will turn to the topics relished by all devotees. The propaganda that the Lord is impersonal, that He has no activity and that He is a dumb stone without any name and form has encouraged people to become godless, faithless demons, and the more they deviate from the transcendental activities of the Lord, the more they become accustomed to mundane activities that only clear their path to hell instead of return them home, back to Godhead.* Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam begins from the history of the Pāṇḍavas (with necessary politics and social activities), and yet Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is said to be the Pāramahaṁsa-saṁhitā, or the Vedic literature meant for the topmost transcendentalist, and it describes paraṁ jñānam, the highest transcendental knowledge. Pure devotees of the Lord are all paramahaṁsas, and they are like the swans, who know the art of sucking milk out of a mixture of milk and water.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O learned Sūta! You should tell that to us, who desire to hear. Topics which conclude in discussion of the Lord will certainly appear in the assembly of great devotees.
Commentary

Having understood that hearing and chanting are necessary, what else did Parīkṣit ask? They hoped that he would ask about the topic of Kṛṣṇa that should be heard and chanted. One cannot say the other topics even about creation and sub-creation, Manvantaras and kings are unrelated. Even those topics about creation and sub-creation which conclude in discussion of the Lord should be heard because they end with the discussion of Kṛṣṇa.

Topics about Hari belong in the assembly of devotees. The eagerness to keep hearing more is itself a sign of life — the absence of that eagerness is the symptom to worry about.
Reflection Questions
  • How alive is my eagerness to hear hari-kathā right now — and what dulled or sharpened it lately?
  • What assembly of devotees am I part of, and how often do we actually discuss Him?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.15

↗
स वै भागवतो राजा पाण्डवेयो महारथ: । बालक्रीडनकै: क्रीडन् कृष्णक्रीडां य आददे ॥ १५ ॥
sa vai bhāgavato rājā
[sa vai bhaagavato raajaa]
pāṇḍaveyo mahā-rathaḥ
[paandaveyo mahaa-rathah]
bāla-krīḍanakaiḥ krīḍan
[baala-kreedanakaih kreedan]
kṛṣṇa-kṛīḍāṁ ya ādade
[krishna-krieedaam ya aadade]
saḥ — he vai — certainly bhāgavataḥ — a great devotee of the Lord rājā — Mahārāja Parīkṣit pāṇḍaveyaḥ — grandson of the Pāṇḍavas mahā-rathaḥ — a great fighter bāla — while a child krīḍanakaiḥ — with play dolls krīḍan — playing kṛṣṇa — Lord Kṛṣṇa krīḍām — activities yaḥ — who ādade — accepted.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vai bhāgavato rājā
saḥ
he
vai
certainly
bhāgavataḥ
a great devotee of the Lord
rājā
Mahārāja Parīkṣit
pāṇḍaveyo mahā-rathaḥ
pāṇḍaveyaḥ
grandson of the Pāṇḍavas
mahā-rathaḥ
a great fighter
bāla-krīḍanakaiḥ krīḍan
bāla
while a child
krīḍanakaiḥ
with play dolls
krīḍan
playing
kṛṣṇa-kṛīḍāṁ ya ādade
kṛṣṇa
Lord Kṛṣṇa
krīḍām
activities
yaḥ
who
ādade
accepted.
Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the grandson of the Pāṇḍavas, was from his very childhood a great devotee of the Lord. Even while playing with dolls, he used to worship Lord Kṛṣṇa by imitating the worship of the family Deity.

In the Bhagavad-gītā (6.41) it is stated that even a person who has failed in the proper discharge of yoga practice is given a chance to take birth in the house of devout brāhmaṇas or in the houses of rich men like kṣatriya kings or rich merchants. But Mahārāja Parīkṣit was more than that because he had been a great devotee of the Lord since his previous birth, and as such he took his birth in an imperial family of the Kurus, and especially that of the Pāṇḍavas. So from the very beginning of his childhood he had the chance to know intimately the devotional service of Lord Kṛṣṇa in his own family. The Pāṇḍavas, all being devotees of the Lord, certainly venerated family Deities in the royal palace for worship. Children who appear in such families fortunately generally imitate such worship of the Deities, even in the way of childhood play. By the grace of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, we had the chance of being born in a Vaiṣṇava family, and in our childhood we imitated the worship of Lord Kṛṣṇa by imitating our father. Our father encouraged us in all respects to observe all functions such as the Ratha-yātrā and Dola-yātrā ceremonies, and he used to spend money liberally for distributing prasāda to us children and our friends. Our spiritual master, who also took his birth in a Vaiṣṇava family, got all inspirations from his great Vaiṣṇava father, Ṭhākura Bhaktivinoda. That is the way of all lucky Vaiṣṇava families. The celebrated Mīrā Bāī was a staunch devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa as the great lifter of Govardhana Hill.

The life history of many such devotees is almost the same because there is always symmetry between the early lives of all great devotees of the Lord. According to Jīva Gosvāmī, Mahārāja Parīkṣit must have heard about the childhood pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa at Vṛndāvana, for he used to imitate the pastimes with his young playmates. According to Śrīdhara Svāmī, Mahārāja Parīkṣit used to imitate the worship of the family Deity by elderly members. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī also confirms the viewpoint of Jīva Gosvāmī. So accepting either of them, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was naturally inclined to Lord Kṛṣṇa from his very childhood. He might have imitated either of the above-mentioned activities, and all of them establish his great devotion from his very childhood, a symptom of a mahā-bhāgavata. Such mahā-bhāgavatas are called nitya-siddhas, or souls liberated from birth. But there are also others, who may not be liberated from birth but who develop a tendency for devotional service by association, and they are called sādhana-siddhas. There is no difference between the two in the ultimate issue, and so the conclusion is that everyone can become a sādhana-siddha, a devotee of the Lord, simply by association with the pure devotees. The concrete example is our great spiritual master Śrī Nārada Muni. In his previous life he was simply a boy of a maidservant, but through association with great devotees he became a devotee of the Lord of his own standard, unique in the history of devotional service.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That King, grandson of the Pāṇḍavas, and a mahā-ratha, who, while playing as a child with toys, would enact Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes, was a great devotee.
Commentary

That assembly of devotees, among mature and immature assemblies, was the best of all. There the hearer and the speaker were most extraordinary. That is explained in two verses. While a child, Parīkṣit would enact Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes.

Parīkṣit was a devotee even as a child, imitating worship in play. Children absorb what they see — devotion in the home shapes the next generation far more than instruction does.
Reflection Questions
  • What did I imitate as a child — and what am I unconsciously modeling for those around me now?
  • How could I make devotional practice visible enough that imitation becomes possible for others?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.16

↗
वैयासकिश्च भगवान् वासुदेवपरायण: । उरुगायगुणोदारा: सतां स्युर्हि समागमे ॥ १६ ॥
vaiyāsakiś ca bhagavān
[vaiyaasakish cha bhagavaan]
vāsudeva-parāyaṇaḥ
[vaasudeva-paraayanah]
urugāya-guṇodārāḥ
[urugaaya-gunodaaraah]
satāṁ syur hi samāgame
[sataam syur hi samaagame]
vaiyāsakiḥ — the son of Vyāsadeva ca — also bhagavān — full in transcendental knowledge vāsudeva — Lord Kṛṣṇa parāyaṇaḥ — attached to urugāya — of the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is glorified by great philosophers guṇa-udārāḥ — great qualities satām — of the devotees syuḥ — must have been hi — as a matter of fact samāgame — by the presence of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vaiyāsakiś ca bhagavān
vaiyāsakiḥ
the son of Vyāsadeva
ca
also
bhagavān
full in transcendental knowledge
vāsudeva-parāyaṇaḥ
vāsudeva
Lord Kṛṣṇa
parāyaṇaḥ
attached to
urugāya-guṇodārāḥ
urugāya
of the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa, who is glorified by great philosophers
guṇa-udārāḥ
great qualities
satāṁ syur hi samāgame
satām
of the devotees
syuḥ
must have been
hi
as a matter of fact
samāgame
by the presence of.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī, the son of Vyāsadeva, was also full in transcendental knowledge and was a great devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, son of Vasudeva. So there must have been discussion of Lord Kṛṣṇa, who is glorified by great philosophers and in the company of great devotees.

The word satām is very important in this verse. Satām means the pure devotees, who have no other desire than to serve the Lord. Only in the association of such devotees are the transcendental glories of Lord Kṛṣṇa properly discussed. It is said by the Lord that His topics are all full of spiritual significance, and once one properly hears about Him in the association of the satām, certainly one senses the great potency and so automatically attains to the devotional stage of life. As already described, Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a great devotee of the Lord from his very birth, and so was Śukadeva Gosvāmī. Both of them were on the same level, although it appeared that Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a great king accustomed to royal facilities whereas Śukadeva Gosvāmī was a typical renouncer of the world, so much so that he did not even put a cloth on his body. Superficially, Mahārāja Parīkṣit and Śukadeva Gosvāmī might seem to be opposites, but basically they were both unalloyed, pure devotees of the Lord. When such devotees are assembled together, there can be no topics save discussions of the glories of the Lord, or bhakti-yoga. In the Bhagavad-gītā also, when there were talks between the Lord and His devotee Arjuna, there could not be any topic other than bhakti-yoga, however the mundane scholars may speculate on it in their own ways. The use of the word ca after vaiyāsakiḥ suggests, according to Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī, that both Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit were of the same category, settled long before, although one was playing the part of the master and the other the disciple. Since Lord Kṛṣṇa is the center of the topics, the word vāsudeva-parāyaṇaḥ, or “devotee of Vāsudeva,” suggests devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the common aim. Although there were many others who assembled at the place where Mahārāja Parīkṣit was fasting, the natural conclusion is that there was no topic other than the glorification of Lord Kṛṣṇa, because the principal speaker was Śukadeva Gosvāmī and the chief audience was Mahārāja Parīkṣit. So Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, as it was spoken and heard by two principal devotees of the Lord, is only for the glorification of the Supreme Lord, the Personality of Godhead, Śrī Kṛṣṇa.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Omniscient Śukadeva was surrendered to Vāsudeva. In the meeting of such devotees there will arise talks containing abundant qualities of Kṛṣṇa, which fulfill all the mind’s desires.
Commentary

Bhagavān means omniscient. In the meeting of devotees, there will be topics containing Kṛṣṇa’s qualities which generously fulfill (udārāḥ) the mind’s desires. Those qualities of the Lord are fixed for devotees in the present and future. Thus at that place he will produce those qualities of Kṛṣṇa. Topics which give rise to talks about Kṛṣṇa are relished by the devotees.

When pure devotees meet, conversation naturally turns to Kṛṣṇa. The subject is not chosen by effort but flows from the heart's actual love. The test of devotional company is what surfaces when no one is enforcing the topic.
Reflection Questions
  • When I am with my closest spiritual companions, what spontaneously comes up?
  • What gap between what I claim to love and what I freely discuss does that reveal?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.17

↗
आयुर्हरति वै पुंसामुद्यन्नस्तं च यन्नसौ । तस्यर्ते यत्क्षणो नीत उत्तमश्लोकवार्तया ॥ १७ ॥
āyur harati vai puṁsām
[aayur harati vai pumsaam]
udyann astaṁ ca yann asau
[udyann astam cha yann asau]
tasyarte yat-kṣaṇo nīta
[tasyarte yat-kshano neeta]
uttama-śloka-vārtayā
[uttama-shloka-vaartayaa]
āyuḥ — duration of life harati — decreases vai — certainly puṁsām — of the people udyan — rising astam — setting ca — also yan — moving asau — the sun tasya — of one who glorifies the Lord ṛte — except yat — by whom kṣaṇaḥ — time nītaḥ — utilized uttama-śloka — the all-good Personality of Godhead vārtayā — in the topics of.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āyur harati vai puṁsām
āyuḥ
duration of life
harati
decreases
vai
certainly
puṁsām
of the people
udyann astaṁ ca yann asau
udyan
rising
astam
setting
ca
also
yan
moving
asau
the sun
tasyarte yat-kṣaṇo nīta
tasya
of one who glorifies the Lord
ṛte
except
yat
by whom
kṣaṇaḥ
time
nītaḥ
utilized
uttama-śloka-vārtayā
uttama-śloka
the all-good Personality of Godhead
vārtayā
in the topics of.
Both by rising and by setting, the sun decreases the duration of life of everyone, except one who utilizes the time by discussing topics of the all-good Personality of Godhead.

This verse indirectly confirms the greater importance of utilizing the human form of life to realize our lost relationship with the Supreme Lord by acceleration of devotional service. Time and tide wait for no man. So the time indicated by the sunrise and the sunset will be uselessly wasted if such time is not properly utilized for realizing identification of spiritual values. Even a fraction of the duration of life wasted cannot be compensated by any amount of gold. Human life is simply awarded to a living entity ( jīva ) so that he can realize his spiritual identity and his permanent source of happiness. A living being, especially the human being, is seeking happiness because happiness is the natural situation of the living entity. But he is vainly seeking happiness in the material atmosphere. A living being is constitutionally a spiritual spark of the complete whole, and his happiness can be perfectly perceived in spiritual activities. The Lord is the complete spirit whole, and His name, form, quality, pastimes, entourage and personality are all identical with Him. Once a person comes into contact with any one of the above-mentioned energies of the Lord through the proper channel of devotional service, the door to perfection is immediately opened. In the Bhagavad-gītā (2.40) the Lord has explained such contact in the following words: “Endeavors in devotional service are never baffled. Nor is there failure. A slight beginning of such activities is sufficient even to deliver a person from the great ocean of material fears.” As a highly potent drug injected intravenously acts at once on the whole body, the transcendental topics of the Lord injected through the ear by the pure devotee of the Lord can act very efficiently. Aural realization of the transcendental messages implies total realization, just as fructification of one part of a tree implies fructification of all other parts. This realization for a moment in the association of pure devotees like Śukadeva Gosvāmī prepares one’s complete life for eternity. And thus the sun fails to rob the pure devotee of his duration of life, inasmuch as he is constantly busy in the devotional service of the Lord, purifying his existence. Death is a symptom of the material infection of the eternal living being; only due to material infection is the eternal living entity subjected to the law of birth, death, old age and disease.

The materialistic way of pious activities like charity is recommended in the smṛti-śāstras as quoted by Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura. Money given in charity to a suitable person is guaranteed bank balance in the next life. Such charity is recommended to be given to a brāhmaṇa. If the money is given in charity to a non- brāhmaṇa (without brahminical qualification) the money is returned in the next life in the same proportion. If it is given in charity to a half-educated brāhmaṇa, even then the money is returned double. If the money is given in charity to a learned and fully qualified brāhmaṇa, the money is returned a hundred and a thousand times, and if the money is given to a veda-pāraga (one who has factually realized the path of the Vedas ), it is returned by unlimited multiplication. The ultimate end of Vedic knowledge is realization of the Personality of Godhead, Lord Kṛṣṇa, as stated in the Bhagavad-gītā ( vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ ). There is a guarantee of money’s being returned if given in charity, regardless of the proportion. Similarly, a moment passed in the association of a pure devotee by hearing and chanting the transcendental messages of the Lord is a perfect guarantee for eternal life, for returning home, back to Godhead. Mad-dhāma gatvā punar janma na vidyate. In other words, a devotee of the Lord is guaranteed eternal life. A devotee’s old age or disease in the present life is but an impetus to such guaranteed eternal life.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Both by rising and by setting, the sun decreases the duration of life of everyone, except one who utilizes the time by discussing topics of the Supreme Lord.
Commentary

This is not an activity which can be delayed. The sun rises and sets. It steals away men’s lives except the life where there arises the opportunity (kṣaṇaḥ) for hearing topics of Kṛṣṇa. Or the sun steals way life, except the life where even just a moment is spent in the topics of the Lord. By this alone, life becomes successful. It is said that when one branch of the tree bears fruit, the whole tree becomes successful. What then to speak of all the branches bearing fruit. If one spent one’s whole life absorbed in Kṛṣṇa’s topics, how wonderful it would be! “If that is so, and life is not taken away by hearing about Kṛṣṇa, from the moment of hearing about Kṛṣṇa, a person should not die.” That is true. It is said that the wealth of those of good character is imperishable wealth, since others spend their wealth in unlimited pleasures. The smṛti says:

samam abrāhmaṇe dānaṁ dviguṇaṁ brāhmaṇa-bruve | adhīte śata-sāhasram anantaṁ veda-pārage ||

In giving to the non-brāhmaṇa the amount remains the same. In giving to a brāhmaṇa in name only the amount doubles. In giving to a brāhmaṇa who knows the Vedas thoroughly, the amount multiplies by a hundred thousand. Manu-smṛti 7.85

The devotee, blessed with long life by Kṛṣṇa, then becomes the associate of the Lord. Certainly his life is indestructible. Thus the devotee of Kṛṣṇa does not have his life stolen away. The devotees’ old age, death and sickness appear by the will of the Lord for increasing his longing for the Lord, for letting the opinions of others not be destroyed [Note: Jñānīs think karmas of this life can be destroyed only by experiencing them. ] and for protecting the confidential nature of his devotees. They are not caused by time or karma. This has been explained in the chapter concerning Bhīṣma’s disappearance.

Each sunrise and sunset shortens your life — except when you spend that time in topics of the all-good Lord. Time consumed by Him is time saved from death; everything else is quiet erosion.
Reflection Questions
  • How much of yesterday's hours were spent in topics of the Lord versus everything else?
  • What one slot in tomorrow could I deliberately reclaim for Him?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.18

↗
तरव: किं न जीवन्ति भस्त्रा: किं न श्वसन्त्युत । न खादन्ति न मेहन्ति किं ग्रामे पशवोऽपरे ॥ १८ ॥
taravaḥ kiṁ na jīvanti
[taravah kim na jeevanti]
bhastrāḥ kiṁ na śvasanty uta
[bhastraah kim na shvasanty uta]
na khādanti na mehanti
[na khaadanti na mehanti]
kiṁ grāme paśavo ’pare
[kim graame pashavo ’pare]
taravaḥ — the trees kim — whether na — do not jīvanti — live bhastrāḥ — bellows kim — whether na — do not śvasanti — breathe uta — also na — do not khādanti — eat na — do not mehanti — discharge semen kim — whether grāme — in the locality paśavaḥ — beastly living being apare — others.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taravaḥ kiṁ na jīvanti
taravaḥ
the trees
kim
whether
na
do not
jīvanti
live
bhastrāḥ kiṁ na śvasanty uta
bhastrāḥ
bellows
kim
whether
na
do not
śvasanti
breathe
uta
also
na khādanti na mehanti
na
do not
khādanti
eat
na
do not
mehanti
discharge semen
kiṁ grāme paśavo ’pare
kim
whether
grāme
in the locality
paśavaḥ
beastly living being
apare
others.
Do the trees not live? Do the bellows of the blacksmith not breathe? All around us, do the beasts not eat and discharge semen?

The materialistic man of the modern age will argue that life, or part of it, is never meant for discussion of theosophical or theological arguments. Life is meant for the maximum duration of existence for eating, drinking, sexual intercourse, making merry and enjoying life. The modern man wants to live forever by the advancement of material science, and there are many foolish theories for prolonging life to the maximum duration. But the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam affirms that life is not meant for so-called economic development or advancement of materialistic science for the hedonistic philosophy of eating, mating, drinking and merrymaking. Life is solely meant for tapasya, for purifying existence so that one may enter into eternal life just after the end of the human form of life.

The materialists want to prolong life as much as possible because they have no information of the next life. They want to get the maximum comforts in this present life because they think conclusively that there is no life after death. This ignorance about the eternity of the living being and the change of covering in the material world has played havoc in the structure of modern human society. Consequently there are many problems, multiplied by various plans of modernized man. The plans for solving the problems of society have only aggravated the troubles. Even if it is possible to prolong life more than one hundred years, advancement of human civilization does not necessarily follow. The Bhāgavatam says that certain trees live for hundreds and thousands of years. At Vṛndāvana there is a tamarind tree (the place is known as Imlitala) which is said to have existed since the time of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the Calcutta Botanical Garden there is a banyan tree said to be older than five hundred years, and there are many such trees all over the world. Svāmī Śaṅkarācārya lived only thirty-two years, and Lord Caitanya lived forty-eight years. Does it mean that the prolonged lives of the above-mentioned trees are more important than Śaṅkara or Caitanya? Prolonged life without spiritual value is not very important. One may doubt that trees have life because they do not breathe. But modern scientists like Bose have already proved that there is life in plants, so breathing is no sign of actual life. The Bhāgavatam says that the bellows of the blacksmith breathes very soundly, but that does not mean that the bellows has life. The materialist will argue that life in the tree and life in the man cannot be compared because the tree cannot enjoy life by eating palatable dishes or by enjoying sexual intercourse. In reply to this, the Bhāgavatam asks whether other animals like the dogs and hogs, living in the same village with human beings, do not eat and enjoy sexual life. The specific utterance of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in regard to “other animals” means that persons who are simply engaged in planning a better type of animal life consisting of eating, breathing and mating are also animals in the shape of human beings. A society of such polished animals cannot benefit suffering humanity, for an animal can easily harm another animal but rarely do good.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Do not the trees live long life? Do not the bellows breathe? Do not the village animals and animal-like men eat and mate?
Commentary

The person whose life is not stolen away does not receive rebirth in this world. Do not the trees live? They live much longer than the humans. But they do not breathe. Does not the bellows breathe? The bellows breathe more strongly than the humans. But the bellows do not eat. Do not the animals eat and mate? They can eat more than the humans. Apare indicates animals in human form.

Trees live, bellows breathe, beasts eat and reproduce. Bodily existence alone is not human — it is shared by every species. What sets human life apart is the use we make of it for tapasya and transcendence.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my daily life is genuinely 'human' rather than just biological?
  • Where am I confusing being alive with being awake?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.19

↗
श्वविड्‍वराहोष्ट्रखरै: संस्तुत: पुरुष: पशु: । न यत्कर्णपथोपेतो जातु नाम गदाग्रज: ॥ १९ ॥
śva-viḍ-varāhoṣṭra-kharaiḥ
[shva-vid-varaahoshtra-kharaih]
saṁstutaḥ puruṣaḥ paśuḥ
[samstutah purushah pashuh]
na yat-karṇa-pathopeto
[na yat-karna-pathopeto]
jātu nāma gadāgrajaḥ
[jaatu naama gadaagrajah]
śva — a dog viṭ-varāha — the village hog who eats stool uṣṭra — the camel kharaiḥ — and by the asses saṁstutaḥ — perfectly praised puruṣaḥ — a person paśuḥ — animal na — never yat — of him karṇa — ear patha — path upetaḥ — reached jātu — at any time nāma — the holy name gadāgrajaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa, the deliverer from all evils.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śva-viḍ-varāhoṣṭra-kharaiḥ
śva
a dog
viṭ-varāha
the village hog who eats stool
saṁstutaḥ puruṣaḥ paśuḥ
uṣṭra
the camel
kharaiḥ
and by the asses
saṁstutaḥ
perfectly praised
puruṣaḥ
a person
paśuḥ
animal
na yat-karṇa-pathopeto
na
never
yat
of him
karṇa
ear
patha
path
upetaḥ
reached
jātu nāma gadāgrajaḥ
jātu
at any time
nāma
the holy name
gadāgrajaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the deliverer from all evils.
Men who are like dogs, hogs, camels and asses praise those men who never listen to the transcendental pastimes of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the deliverer from evils.

The general mass of people, unless they are trained systematically for a higher standard of life in spiritual values, are no better than animals, and in this verse they have particularly been put on the level of dogs, hogs, camels and asses. Modern university education practically prepares one to acquire a doggish mentality with which to accept the service of a greater master. After finishing a so-called education, the so-called educated persons move like dogs from door to door with applications for some service, and mostly they are driven away, informed of no vacancy. As dogs are negligible animals and serve the master faithfully for bits of bread, a man serves a master faithfully without sufficient rewards.

Persons who have no discrimination in the matter of foodstuff and who eat all sorts of rubbish are compared to hogs. Hogs are very much attached to eating stools. So stool is a kind of foodstuff for a particular type of animal. And even stones are eatables for a particular type of animal or bird. But the human being is not meant for eating everything and anything; he is meant to eat grains, vegetables, fruits, milk, sugar, etc. Animal food is not meant for the human being. For chewing solid food, the human being has a particular type of teeth meant for cutting fruits and vegetables. The human being is endowed with two canine teeth as a concession for persons who will eat animal food at any cost. It is known to everyone that one man’s food is another man’s poison. Human beings are expected to accept the remnants of food offered to Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, and the Lord accepts foodstuff from the categories of leaves, flowers, fruits, etc. ( Bg. 9.26 ). As prescribed by Vedic scriptures, no animal food is offered to the Lord. Therefore, a human being is meant to eat a particular type of food. He should not imitate the animals to derive so-called vitamin values. Therefore, a person who has no discrimination in regard to eating is compared to a hog.

The camel is a kind of animal that takes pleasure in eating thorns. A person who wants to enjoy family life or the worldly life of so-called enjoyment is compared to the camel. Materialistic life is full of thorns, and so one should live only by the prescribed method of Vedic regulations just to make the best use of a bad bargain. Life in the material world is maintained by sucking one’s own blood. The central point of attraction for material enjoyment is sex life. To enjoy sex life is to suck one’s own blood, and there is not much more to be explained in this connection. The camel also sucks its own blood while chewing thorny twigs. The thorns the camel eats cut the tongue of the camel, and so blood begins to flow within the camel’s mouth. The thorns, mixed with fresh blood, create a taste for the foolish camel, and so he enjoys the thorn-eating business with false pleasure. Similarly, the great business magnates, industrialists who work very hard to earn money by different ways and questionable means, eat the thorny results of their actions mixed with their own blood. Therefore the Bhāgavatam has situated these diseased fellows along with the camels.

The ass is an animal who is celebrated as the greatest fool, even amongst the animals. The ass works very hard and carries burdens of the maximum weight without making profit for itself.* The ass is generally engaged by the washerman, whose social position is not very respectable. And the special qualification of the ass is that it is very much accustomed to being kicked by the opposite sex. When the ass begs for sexual intercourse, he is kicked by the fair sex, yet he still follows the female for such sexual pleasure. A henpecked man is compared, therefore, to the ass. The general mass of people work very hard, especially in the Age of Kali. In this age the human being is actually engaged in the work of an ass, carrying heavy burdens and driving ṭhelā and rickshaws. The so-called advancement of human civilization has engaged a human being in the work of an ass. The laborers in great factories and workshops are also engaged in such burdensome work, and after working hard during the day, the poor laborer has to be again kicked by the fair sex, not only for sex enjoyment but also for so many household affairs.

So Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam’s categorization of the common man without any spiritual enlightenment into the society of dogs, hogs, camels and asses is not at all an exaggeration. The leaders of such ignorant masses of people may feel very proud of being adored by such a number of dogs and hogs, but that is not very flattering. The Bhāgavatam openly declares that although a person may be a great leader of such dogs and hogs disguised as men, if he has no taste for being enlightened in the science of Kṛṣṇa, such a leader is also an animal and nothing more. He may be designated as a powerful, strong animal, or a big animal, but in the estimation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam he is never given a place in the category of man, on account of his atheistic temperament. Or in other words, such godless leaders of dogs and hoglike men are bigger animals with the qualities of animals in greater proportion.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
This human animal, whose ear has never heard about Kṛṣṇa, is praised by dogs, hogs, camels and donkeys.
Commentary

Their animalistic life is to be condemned. They are glorified profusely by dogs, pigs, camels and donkeys. He as one person accepts the qualities of us four (animals), whereas we are all incapable of taking up another animal’s qualities. He, being a human, can take up so many qualities of animals, and we being animals, cannot take up even one quality of another animal. Overstepping his scripture ordained by dharma, he accepts our qualities with passion. We however are fixed in our qualities by destiny. He is aware of the hell into which he will be born by following our qualities, whereas we are dull-witted and cannot understand anything of the future. In this way the animals praise him in four ways. The dog’s quality is to become angry without reason. The pigs quality is eat impure items. The quality of the camel is carrying heavy burdens. The quality of the donkey is to get kicked by his mate. Kṛṣṇa has never gone in that person’s ears. Gadāgraja means “he who appears in front of sickness (gada) as its enemy.” Thus he will appear and destroy the sickness of anger and other bad qualities of the animalistic man.

Related verses
Those who never hear of Kṛṣṇa are praised by people who themselves live like dogs, hogs, camels, and asses. The verse is harsh because it wants to wake us up: whose praise are we actually living for?
Reflection Questions
  • Whose approval most shapes my behavior — and what does that approval reveal about them?
  • Would the praise I currently chase still feel valuable if I saw clearly who was giving it?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.20

↗
बिले बतोरुक्रमविक्रमान् ये न श‍ृण्वत: कर्णपुटे नरस्य । जिह्वासती दार्दुरिकेव सूत न चोपगायत्युरुगायगाथा: ॥ २० ॥
bile batorukrama-vikramān ye
[bile batorukrama-vikramaan ye]
na śṛṇvataḥ karṇa-puṭe narasya
[na shrinvatah karna-pute narasya]
jihvāsatī dārdurikeva sūta
[jihvaasatee daardurikeva soota]
na copagāyaty urugāya-gāthāḥ
[na chopagaayaty urugaaya-gaathaah]
bile — snake holes bata — like urukrama — the Lord, who acts marvelously vikramān — prowess ye — all these na — never śṛṇvataḥ — heard karṇa-puṭe — the earholes narasya — of the man jihvā — tongue asatī — useless dārdurikā — of the frogs iva — exactly like that sūta — O Sūta Gosvāmī na — never ca — also upagāyati — chants loudly urugāya — worth singing gāthāḥ — songs.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bile batorukrama-vikramān ye
bile
snake holes
bata
like
na śṛṇvataḥ karṇa-puṭe narasya
jihvāsatī dārdurikeva sūta
urukrama
the Lord, who acts marvelously
vikramān
prowess
ye
all these
na copagāyaty urugāya-gāthāḥ
na
never
śṛṇvataḥ
heard
karṇa-puṭe
the earholes
narasya
of the man
jihvā
tongue
asatī
useless
dārdurikā
of the frogs
iva
exactly like that
sūta
O Sūta Gosvāmī
na
never
ca
also
upagāyati
chants loudly
urugāya
worth singing
gāthāḥ
songs.
One who has not listened to the messages about the prowess and marvelous acts of the Personality of Godhead and has not sung or chanted loudly the worthy songs about the Lord is to be considered to possess earholes like the holes of snakes and a tongue like the tongue of a frog.

Devotional service to the Lord is rendered by all limbs or parts of the body. It is the transcendental dynamic force of the spirit soul; therefore a devotee is engaged one hundred percent in the service of the Lord. One can engage in devotional service when the senses of the body are purified in relation with the Lord, and one can render service to the Lord with the help of all the senses. As such, the senses and the action of the senses are to be considered impure or materialistic as long as they are employed only in sense gratification. The purified senses are engaged not in sense gratification but in the service of the Lord in toto. The Lord is the Supreme with all senses, and the servitor, who is part and parcel of the Lord, also has the same senses. Service to the Lord is the completely purified use of the senses, as described in the Bhagavad-gītā. The Lord imparted instructions with full senses, and Arjuna received them with full senses, and thus there was a perfect exchange of sensible and logical understanding between the master and the disciple. Spiritual understanding is nothing like an electrical charge from the master to the disciple, as foolishly claimed by some propaganda-mongers. Everything is full of sense and logic, and the exchange of views between the master and disciple is possible only when the reception is submissive and real. In the Caitanya-caritāmṛta it is said that one should receive the teaching of Lord Caitanya with intellect and full senses so that one can logically understand the great mission.

In the impure state of a living being, the various senses are fully engaged in mundane affairs. If the ear is not engaged in the service of the Lord by hearing about Him from Bhagavad-gītā or Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, certainly the holes of the ear will be filled with some rubbish. Therefore the messages of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam should be preached all over the world very loudly. That is the duty of a pure devotee who has actually heard about them from the perfect sources. Many want to speak something to others, but because they are not trained to speak on the subject matter of Vedic wisdom they are all speaking nonsense, and people are receiving them with no sense. There are hundreds and thousands of sources for distributing mundane news of the world, and people of the world are also receiving it. Similarly, the people of the world should be taught to hear the transcendental topics of the Lord, and the devotee of the Lord must speak loudly so that they can hear. The frogs loudly croak, with the result that they invite the snakes to eat them. The human tongue is especially given for chanting the Vedic hymns and not for croaking like frogs. The word asatī used in this verse is also significant. Asatī means a woman who has become a prostitute. A prostitute has no reputation for good womanly qualities. Similarly, the tongue, which is given to the human being for chanting the Vedic hymns, will be considered a prostitute when engaged in chanting some mundane nonsense.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Sūta! How lamentable! The ears of a person who has not heard the glories of the Lord are like snake holes. The tongue which does not chant the glories of the Lord is as offensive as a frog’s tongue.
Commentary

After the whole person has been criticized, the parts of his body are criticized in five verses. Oh! How lamentable! (bata) The ears of a man who has not heard the glories of the Lord are holes fit for snakes to live. The tongue which does not chant the glories of the Lord is offensive (asatī) like that of a frog. Or it is like an unchaste woman, which destroys all of one’s piety. Though a person becomes successful by performing bhakti with even one of these limbs, they are criticized since they are otherwise useless.

Ears that have never heard the Lord's pastimes are like snake holes; a tongue that has never sung His glories is like a frog's. The verse measures bodily parts by their devotional use, not by their decoration.
Reflection Questions
  • What have my ears actually heard most this week — and what shape have they taken?
  • When did my tongue last sing the Lord's name, even softly?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.21

↗
भार: परं पट्टकिरीटजुष्ट - मप्युत्तमाङ्गं न नमेन्मुकुन्दम् । शावौ करौ नो कुरुते सपर्यां हरेर्लसत्काञ्चनकङ्कणौ वा ॥ २१ ॥
bhāraḥ paraṁ paṭṭa-kirīṭa-juṣṭam
[bhaarah param patta-kireeta-jushtam]
apy uttamāṅgaṁ na namen mukundam
[apy uttamaangam na namen mukundam]
śāvau karau no kurute saparyāṁ
[shaavau karau no kurute saparyaam]
harer lasat-kāñcana-kaṅkaṇau vā
[harer lasat-kaanchana-kankanau vaa]
bhāraḥ — a great burden param — heavy paṭṭa — silk kirīṭa — turban juṣṭam — dressed with api — even uttama — upper aṅgam — parts of the body na — never namet — bow down mukundam — Lord Kṛṣṇa, the deliverer śāvau — dead bodies karau — hands no — do not kurute — do saparyām — worshiping hareḥ — of the Personality of Godhead lasat — glittering kāñcana — made of gold kaṅkaṇau — bangles vā — even though.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhāraḥ paraṁ paṭṭa-kirīṭa-juṣṭam
bhāraḥ
a great burden
param
heavy
paṭṭa
silk
kirīṭa
turban
juṣṭam
dressed with
apy uttamāṅgaṁ na namen mukundam
api
even
uttama
upper
aṅgam
parts of the body
na
never
namet
bow down
mukundam
Lord Kṛṣṇa, the deliverer
śāvau karau no kurute saparyāṁ
śāvau
dead bodies
karau
hands
no
do not
kurute
do
saparyām
worshiping
harer lasat-kāñcana-kaṅkaṇau vā
hareḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
lasat
glittering
kāñcana
made of gold
kaṅkaṇau
bangles
vā
even though.
The upper portion of the body, though crowned with a silk turban, is only a heavy burden if not bowed down before the Personality of Godhead who can award mukti [freedom]. And the hands, though decorated with glittering bangles, are like those of a dead man if not engaged in the service of the Personality of Godhead Hari.

As stated hereinbefore, there are three kinds of devotees of the Lord. The first-class devotee does not at all see anyone who is not in the service of the Lord, but the second-class devotee makes distinctions between devotees and nondevotees. The second-class devotees are therefore meant for preaching work, and as referred to in the above verse, they must loudly preach the glories of the Lord. The second-class devotee accepts disciples from the section of third-class devotees or nondevotees. Sometimes the first-class devotee also comes down to the category of the second-class devotee for preaching work. But the common man, who is expected to become at least a third-class devotee, is advised herein to visit the temple of the Lord and bow down before the Deity, even though he may be a very rich man or even a king with a silk turban or crown. The Lord is the Lord of everyone, including the great kings and emperors, and men who are rich in the estimation of mundane people must therefore make it a point to visit the temple of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and regularly bow down before the Deity. The Lord in the temple in the worshipable form is never to be considered to be made of stone or wood, for the Lord in His arcā incarnation as the Deity in the temple shows immense favor to the fallen souls by His auspicious presence. By the hearing process, as mentioned hereinbefore, this realization of the presence of the Lord in the temple is made possible. As such, the first process in the routine work of devotional service — hearing — is the essential point. Hearing by all classes of devotees from the authentic sources like Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is essential. The common man who is puffed up with his material position and does not bow down before the Deity of the Lord in the temple, or who defies temple worship without any knowledge of the science, must know that his so-called turban or crown will only succeed in further drowning him in the water of the ocean of material existence. A drowning man with a heavy weight on his head is sure to go down more swiftly than those who have no heavy weight. A foolish, puffed-up man defies the science of God and says that God has no meaning for him, but when he is in the grip of God’s law and is caught by some disease like cerebral thrombosis, that godless man sinks into the ocean of nescience by the weight of his material acquisition. Advancement of material science without God consciousness is a heavy load on the head of human society, and so one must take heed of this great warning.

The common man, if he has no time to worship the Lord, may at least engage his hands for a few seconds in washing or sweeping the Lord’s temple. Mahārāja Pratāparudra, the greatly powerful king of Orissa, was always very busy with heavy state responsibilities, yet he made it a point to sweep the temple of Lord Jagannātha at Purī once a year during the festival of the Lord. The idea is that however important a man one may be he must accept the supremacy of the Supreme Lord. This God consciousness will help a man even in his material prosperity. Mahārāja Pratāparudra’s subordination before Lord Jagannātha made him a powerful king, so much so that even the great Pathan in his time could not enter into Orissa on account of the powerful Mahārāja Pratāparudra. And at last Mahārāja Pratāparudra was graced by Lord Śrī Caitanya on the very grounds of his acceptance of subordination to the Lord of the universe. So even though a rich man’s wife has glittering bangles made of gold on her hands, she must engage herself in rendering service to the Lord.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The head, decorated with turban and crown, which does not bow to Kṛṣṇa, is simply a heavy weight which will sink the person in saṁsāra. The hands which do not make offerings to the Lord, though decorated with glittering gold bracelets, are those of a dead person.
Commentary

The topmost limb, the head, is simply a burden decorated with crown and turban. It drowns him in the ocean of saṁsāra. The hands are those of a dead person. The devatās and Pitṛṣ do not accept water given by that person because he is impure.

A head in a silken turban that never bows to the Lord is a burden; hands wearing bangles but not in His service are like a corpse's. Ornament without devotion is just weight.
Reflection Questions
  • What status, role, or possession am I carrying that has become 'weight' rather than service?
  • What would it look like to use the same head and hands in actual devotional acts this week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.22

↗
बर्हायिते ते नयने नराणां लिङ्गानि विष्णोर्न निरीक्षतो ये । पादौ नृणां तौ द्रुमजन्मभाजौ क्षेत्राणि नानुव्रजतो हरेर्यौ ॥ २२ ॥
barhāyite te nayane narāṇāṁ
[barhaayite te nayane naraanaam]
liṅgāni viṣṇor na nirīkṣato ye
[lingaani vishnor na nireekshato ye]
pādau nṛṇāṁ tau druma-janma-bhājau
[paadau nrinaam tau druma-janma-bhaajau]
kṣetrāṇi nānuvrajato harer yau
[kshetraani naanuvrajato harer yau]
barhāyite — like plumes of a peacock te — those nayane — eyes narāṇām — of men liṅgāni — forms viṣṇoḥ — of the Personality of Godhead na — does not nirīkṣataḥ — look upon ye — all such pādau — legs nṛṇām — of men tau — those druma-janma — being born of the tree bhājau — like that kṣetrāṇi — holy places na — never anuvrajataḥ — goes after hareḥ — of the Lord yau — which.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
barhāyite te nayane narāṇāṁ
barhāyite
like plumes of a peacock
te
those
nayane
eyes
narāṇām
of men
liṅgāni viṣṇor na nirīkṣato ye
liṅgāni
forms
viṣṇoḥ
of the Personality of Godhead
na
does not
nirīkṣataḥ
look upon
ye
all such
pādau nṛṇāṁ tau druma-janma-bhājau
pādau
legs
nṛṇām
of men
tau
those
druma-janma
being born of the tree
bhājau
like that
kṣetrāṇi nānuvrajato harer yau
kṣetrāṇi
holy places
na
never
anuvrajataḥ
goes after
hareḥ
of the Lord
yau
which.
The eyes which do not look at the symbolic representations of the Personality of Godhead Viṣṇu [His forms, name, quality, etc.] are like those printed on the plumes of the peacock, and the legs which do not move to the holy places [where the Lord is remembered] are considered to be like tree trunks.

Especially for the householder devotees, the path of Deity worship is strongly recommended. As far as possible, every householder, by the direction of the spiritual master, must install the Deity of Viṣṇu, forms like Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa, Lakṣmī-Nārāyaṇa or Sītā-Rāma especially, or any other form of the Lord, like Nṛsiṁha, Varāha, Gaura-Nitāi, Matsya, Kūrma, śālagrāma-śilā and many other forms of Viṣṇu, like Trivikrama, Keśava, Acyuta, Vāsudeva, Nārāyaṇa and Dāmodara, as recommended in the Vaiṣṇava-tantras or Purāṇas, and one’s family should worship strictly following the directions and regulations of arcana-vidhi. Any member of the family who is above twelve years of age should be initiated by a bona fide spiritual master, and all the members of the household should be engaged in the daily service of the Lord, beginning from morning (4 a.m.) till night (10 p.m.) by performing maṅgala-ārātrika, nirañjana, arcana, pūjā, kīrtana, śṛṅgāra, bhoga-vaikāli, sandhyā-ārātrika, pāṭha, bhoga (at night), śayana-ārātrika, etc. Engagement in such worship of the Deity, under the direction of a bona fide spiritual master, will greatly help the householders to purify their very existence and make rapid progress in spiritual knowledge. Simple theoretical book knowledge is not sufficient for a neophyte devotee. Book knowledge is theoretical, whereas the arcana process is practical. Spiritual knowledge must be developed by a combination of theoretical and practical knowledge, and that is the guaranteed way for attainment of spiritual perfection. The training of devotional service for a neophyte devotee completely depends on the expert spiritual master who knows how to lead his disciple to make gradual progress towards the path back home, back to Godhead. One should not become a pseudo spiritual master as a matter of business to meet one’s family expenditures; one must be an expert spiritual master to deliver the disciple from the clutches of impending death. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura has defined the bona fide qualities of a spiritual master, and one of the verses in that description reads:

śrī-vigrahārādhana-nitya-nānā- śṛṅgāra-tan-mandira-mārjanādau yuktasya bhaktāṁś ca niyuñjato ’pi vande guroḥ śrī-caraṇāravindam

Śrī-vigraha is the arcā, or suitable worshipable form of the Lord, and the disciple should be engaged in worshiping the Deity regularly by śṛṅgāra, by proper decoration and dressing, as also by mandira-mārjana, the matter of cleansing the temple. The spiritual master teaches the neophyte devotee all these kindly and personally to help him gradually in the realization of the transcendental name, quality, form, etc., of the Lord.

Only attention engaged in the service of the Lord, especially in dressing and decorating the temple, accompanied by musical kīrtana and spiritual instructions from scriptures, can save the common man from the hellish cinema attractions and rubbish sex-songs broadcast everywhere by radios. If one is unable to maintain a temple at home, he should go to another’s temple where all the above performances are regularly executed. Visiting the temple of a devotee and looking at the profusely decorated forms of the Lord well dressed in a well-decorated, sanctified temple naturally infuse the mundane mind with spiritual inspiration. People should visit holy places like Vṛndāvana where such temples and worship of the Deity are specifically maintained. Formerly all rich men like kings and rich merchants constructed such temples under the direction of expert devotees of the Lord, like the Six Gosvāmīs, and it is the duty of the common man to take advantage of these temples and festivals observed in the holy places of pilgrimage by following in the footsteps of great devotees ( anuvraja ). One should not visit all these sanctified pilgrimage places and temples with sightseeing in mind, but one must go to such temples and sanctified places immortalized by the transcendental pastimes of the Lord and be guided by proper men who know the science. This is called anuvraja. Anu means to follow. It is therefore best to follow the instruction of the bona fide spiritual master, even in visiting temples and the holy places of pilgrimage. One who does not move in that way is as good as a standing tree condemned by the Lord not to move. The moving tendency of the human being is misused by visiting places for sightseeing. The best purpose of such traveling tendencies could be fulfilled by visiting the holy places established by great ācāryas and thereby not being misled by the atheistic propaganda of moneymaking men who have no knowledge of spiritual matters.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Men’s eyes which do not see the form of the Lord are like the eyes on the peacock feather, and they fall on the thorny field of saṁsāra. Men’s feet which do not walk to the places of the Lord are like the bases of trees, to be cut by the axes of Yama-dūtas.
Commentary

The eyes which do not see the deity form of Viṣṇu are like those on the peacock feather. Those persons whose eyes do not see the path of deliverance for the self fall into the thorn field of saṁsāra. The feet of men who do not go to holy places are born as trees. They are similar to the bases of trees, cut by the axes of the Yama-dūtas.

Eyes that don't see the Lord's form are like the false eyes on a peacock feather; legs that don't go to holy places are tree trunks. The senses are meant to move us toward Him, not just to function biologically.
Reflection Questions
  • Which of my senses is most underused for devotion — eyes, legs, or another?
  • Where could I deliberately direct that sense toward the Lord in the next week?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.23

↗
जीवञ्छवो भागवताङ्‌घ्रिरेणुं न जातु मर्त्योऽभिलभेत यस्तु । श्रीविष्णुपद्या मनुजस्तुलस्या: श्वसञ्छवो यस्तु न वेद गन्धम् ॥ २३ ॥
jīvaṣ chavo bhāgavatāṅghri-reṇuṁ
[jeevash chavo bhaagavataanghri-renum]
na jātu martyo ’bhilabheta yas tu
[na jaatu martyo ’bhilabheta yas tu]
śrī-viṣṇu-padyā manujas tulasyāḥ
[shree-vishnu-padyaa manujas tulasyaah]
śvasaṣ chavo yas tu na veda gandham
[shvasash chavo yas tu na veda gandham]
jīvan — while living śavaḥ — a dead body bhāgavata-aṅghri-reṇum — the dust of the feet of a pure devotee na — never jātu — at any time martyaḥ — mortal abhilabheta — particularly received yaḥ — a person tu — but śrī — with opulence viṣṇu-padyāḥ — of the lotus feet of Viṣṇu manu-jaḥ — a descendant of Manu (a man) tulasyāḥ — leaves of the tulasī tree śvasan — while breathing śavaḥ — still a dead body yaḥ — who tu — but na veda — never experienced gandham — the aroma.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jīvaṣ chavo bhāgavatāṅghri-reṇuṁ
jīvan
while living
na jātu martyo ’bhilabheta yas tu
śrī-viṣṇu-padyā manujas tulasyāḥ
śvasaṣ chavo yas tu na veda gandham
śavaḥ
a dead body
bhāgavata-aṅghri-reṇum
the dust of the feet of a pure devotee
na
never
jātu
at any time
martyaḥ
mortal
abhilabheta
particularly received
yaḥ
a person
tu
but
śrī
with opulence
viṣṇu-padyāḥ
of the lotus feet of Viṣṇu
manu-jaḥ
a descendant of Manu (a man)
tulasyāḥ
leaves of the tulasī tree
śvasan
while breathing
śavaḥ
still a dead body
yaḥ
who
tu
but
na veda
never experienced
gandham
the aroma.
The person who has not at any time received the dust of the feet of the Lord’s pure devotee upon his head is certainly a dead body. And the person who has never experienced the aroma of the tulasī leaves from the lotus feet of the Lord is also a dead body, although breathing.

According to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura, the breathing dead body is a ghost. When a man dies, he is called dead, but when he again appears in a subtle form not visible to our present vision and yet acts, such a dead body is called a ghost. Ghosts are always very bad elements, always creating a fearful situation for others. Similarly, the ghostlike nondevotees who have no respect for the pure devotees, nor for the Viṣṇu Deity in the temples, create a fearful situation for the devotees at all times. The Lord never accepts any offering by such impure ghosts. There is a common saying that one should first love the dog of the beloved before one shows any loving sentiments for the beloved. The stage of pure devotion is attained by sincerely serving a pure devotee of the Lord. The first condition of devotional service to the Lord is therefore to be a servant of a pure devotee, and this condition is fulfilled by the statement “reception of the dust of the lotus feet of a pure devotee who has also served another pure devotee.” That is the way of pure disciplic succession, or devotional paramparā.

Mahārāja Rahūgaṇa inquired from the great saint Jaḍa Bharata as to how he had attained such a liberated stage of a paramahaṁsa, and in answer the great saint replied as follows ( Bhāg. 5.12.12 ):

rahūgaṇaitat tapasā na yāti na cejyayā nirvapaṇād gṛhād vā na cchandasā naiva jalāgni-sūryair vinā mahat-pāda-rajo-’bhiṣekam

“O King Rahūgaṇa, the perfectional stage of devotional service, or the paramahaṁsa stage of life, cannot be attained unless one is blessed by the dust of the feet of great devotees. It is never attained by tapasya [austerity], the Vedic worshiping process, acceptance of the renounced order of life, the discharge of the duties of household life, the chanting of the Vedic hymns, or the performance of penances in the hot sun, within cold water or before the blazing fire.”

In other words, Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the property of His pure, unconditional devotees, and as such only the devotees can deliver Kṛṣṇa to another devotee; Kṛṣṇa is never obtainable directly. Lord Caitanya therefore designated Himself as gopī-bhartuḥ pada-kamalayor dāsa-dāsānudāsaḥ , or “the most obedient servant of the servants of the Lord, who maintains the gopī damsels at Vṛndāvana.” A pure devotee therefore never approaches the Lord directly, but tries to please the servant of the Lord’s servants, and thus the Lord becomes pleased, and only then can the devotee relish the taste of the tulasī leaves stuck to His lotus feet. In the Brahma-saṁhitā it is said that the Lord is never to be found by becoming a great scholar of the Vedic literatures, but He is very easily approachable through His pure devotee. In Vṛndāvana all the pure devotees pray for the mercy of Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī, the pleasure potency of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī is a tenderhearted feminine counterpart of the supreme whole, resembling the perfectional stage of the worldly feminine nature. Therefore, the mercy of Rādhārāṇī is available very readily to the sincere devotees, and once She recommends such a devotee to Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Lord at once accepts the devotee’s admittance into His association. The conclusion is, therefore, that one should be more serious about seeking the mercy of the devotee than that of the Lord directly, and by one’s doing so (by the good will of the devotee) the natural attraction for the service of the Lord will be revived.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That person who does not smear his body with the dust from the devotees’ feet is a ghost, whose offerings are not accepted by the Lord. That person who does not smell the fragrance of the tulasī on Viṣṇu’s feet is similarly a ghost.
Commentary

After criticism of various parts of the body, there is now criticism of all of them together. The person who does not touch (abhilabheta) the dust of the devotees’ feet, who does not smear that dust on his body, is like a living corpse --a departed soul (śavaḥ), who frightens the devotees by his presence. This means that the Lord does not accept the service from his hands. The person who is not eager to smell the fragrance of tulasī attached to the Lord’s feet is also a breathing corpse.

Related verses
Someone who has never received dust from a pure devotee's feet, never smelled tulasī from the Lord's feet, is breathing but spiritually a corpse. Real life begins when reverence enters the body.
Reflection Questions
  • When did I last sit at the feet of someone whose devotion humbled me — and what did it do to me?
  • Where am I rationing reverence in a way that keeps me technically alive but spiritually inert?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.24

↗
तदश्मसारं हृदयं बतेदं यद् गृह्यमाणैर्हरिनामधेयै: । न विक्रियेताथ यदा विकारो नेत्रे जलं गात्ररुहेषु हर्ष: ॥ २४ ॥
tad aśma-sāraṁ hṛdayaṁ batedaṁ
[tad ashma-saaram hridayam batedam]
yad gṛhyamāṇair hari-nāma-dheyaiḥ
[yad grihyamaanair hari-naama-dheyaih]
na vikriyetātha yadā vikāro
[na vikriyetaatha yadaa vikaaro]
netre jalaṁ gātra-ruheṣu harṣaḥ
[netre jalam gaatra-ruheshu harshah]
tat — that aśma-sāram — is steel-framed hṛdayam — heart bata idam — certainly that yat — which gṛhyamāṇaiḥ — in spite of chanting hari-nāma — the holy name of the Lord dheyaiḥ — by concentration of the mind na — does not vikriyeta — change atha — thus yadā — when vikāraḥ — reaction netre — in the eyes jalam — tears gātra-ruheṣu — at the pores harṣaḥ — eruptions of ecstasy.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad aśma-sāraṁ hṛdayaṁ batedaṁ
tat
that
aśma-sāram
is steel-framed
hṛdayam
heart
bata idam
certainly that
yad gṛhyamāṇair hari-nāma-dheyaiḥ
yat
which
gṛhyamāṇaiḥ
in spite of chanting
hari-nāma
the holy name of the Lord
dheyaiḥ
by concentration of the mind
na vikriyetātha yadā vikāro
na
does not
vikriyeta
change
atha
thus
yadā
when
vikāraḥ
reaction
netre jalaṁ gātra-ruheṣu harṣaḥ
netre
in the eyes
jalam
tears
gātra-ruheṣu
at the pores
harṣaḥ
eruptions of ecstasy.
Certainly that heart is steel-framed which, in spite of one’s chanting the holy name of the Lord with concentration, does not change when ecstasy takes place, tears fill the eyes and the hairs stand on end.

We should note with profit that in the first three chapters of the Second Canto a gradual process of development of devotional service is being presented. In the First Chapter the first step in devotional service for God consciousness by the process of hearing and chanting has been stressed, and a gross conception of the Personality of Godhead in His universal form for the beginners is recommended. By such a gross conception of God through the material manifestations of His energy, one is enabled to spiritualize the mind and the senses and gradually concentrate the mind upon Lord Viṣṇu, the Supreme, who is present as the Supersoul in every heart and everywhere, in every atom of the material universe. The system of pañca-upāsanā, recommending five mental attitudes for the common man, is also enacted for this purpose, namely gradual development, worship of the superior that may be in the form of fire, electricity, the sun, the mass of living beings, Lord Śiva and, at last, the impersonal Supersoul, the partial representation of Lord Viṣṇu. They are all nicely described in the Second Chapter, but in the Third Chapter further development is prescribed after one has actually reached the stage of Viṣṇu worship, or pure devotional service, and the mature stage of Viṣṇu worship is suggested herein in relation to the change of heart.

The whole process of spiritual culture is aimed at changing the heart of the living being in the matter of his eternal relation with the Supreme Lord as subordinate servant, which is his eternal constitutional position. So with the progress of devotional service, the reaction of change in the heart is exhibited by gradual detachment from the sense of material enjoyment by a false sense of lording it over the world and an increase in the attitude of rendering loving service to the Lord. Vidhi-bhakti, or regulated devotional service by the limbs of the body (namely the eyes, the ears, the nose, the hands and the legs, as already explained hereinbefore), is now stressed herein in relation to the mind, which is the impetus for all activities of the limbs of the body. It is expected by all means that by discharging regulated devotional service one must manifest the change of heart. If there is no such change, the heart must be considered steel-framed, for it is not melted even when there is chanting of the holy name of the Lord. We must always remember that hearing and chanting are the basic principles of discharging devotional duties, and if they are properly performed there will follow the reactional ecstasy with signs of tears in the eyes and standing of the hairs on the body. These are natural consequences and are the preliminary symptoms of the bhāva stage, which occurs before one reaches the perfectional stage of prema, love of Godhead.

If the reaction does not take place, even after continuous hearing and chanting of the holy name of the Lord, it may be considered to be due to offenses only. That is the opinion of the Sandarbha. In the beginning of chanting of the holy name of the Lord, if the devotee has not been very careful about evading the ten kinds of offenses at the feet of the holy name, certainly the reaction of feelings of separation will not be visible by tears in the eyes and standing of the hair on end.

The bhāva stage is manifested by eight transcendental symptoms, namely inertness, perspiration, standing of hairs on end, failing in the voice, trembling, paleness of the body, tears in the eyes and finally trance. The Nectar of Devotion, a summary study of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī’s Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu, explains those symptoms and vividly describes other transcendental developments, both in steady and accelerating manifestations.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura has very critically discussed all these bhāva displays in connection with some unscrupulous neophytes’ imitating the above symptoms for cheap appreciation. Not only Viśvanātha Cakravartī but also Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī treated them very critically. Sometimes all the above eight symptoms of ecstasy are imitated by the mundane devotees ( prākṛta-sahajiyās ), but the pseudo symptoms are at once detected when one sees the pseudodevotee addicted to so many forbidden things. Even though decorated with the signs of a devotee, a person addicted to smoking, drinking or illegitimate sex with women cannot have all the above-mentioned ecstatic symptoms. But it is seen that sometimes these symptoms are willfully imitated, and for this reason Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī accuses the imitators of being stonehearted men. They are sometimes even affected by the reflection of such transcendental symptoms, yet if they still do not give up the forbidden habits, then they are hopeless cases for transcendental realization.

When Lord Caitanya met Śrīla Rāmānanda Rāya of Kavaur on the bank of the Godāvarī, the Lord developed all these symptoms, but because of the presence of some nondevotee brāhmaṇas who were attendants of the Rāya, the Lord suppressed these symptoms. So sometimes they are not visible even in the body of the first-class devotee for certain circumstantial reasons. Therefore real, steady bhāva is definitely displayed in the matter of cessation of material desires ( kṣānti ), utilization of every moment in the transcendental loving service of the Lord ( avyārtha-kālatvam ), eagerness for glorifying the Lord constantly ( nāma-gāne sadā ruci ), attraction for living in the land of the Lord ( prītis tad-vasati sthale ), complete detachment from material happiness ( virakti ), and pridelessness ( māna-śūnyatā ). One who has developed all these transcendental qualities is really possessed of the bhāva stage, as distinguished from the stonehearted imitator or mundane devotee.

The whole process can be summarized as follows: The advanced devotee who chants the holy name of the Lord in a perfectly offenseless manner and is friendly to everyone can actually relish the transcendental taste of glorifying the Lord. And the result of such realization is reflected in the cessation of all material desires, etc., as mentioned above. The neophytes, due to their being in the lower stage of devotional service, are invariably envious, so much so that they invent their own ways and means of devotional regulations without following the ācāryas. As such, even if they make a show of constantly chanting the holy name of the Lord, they cannot relish the transcendental taste of the holy name. Therefore, the show of tears in the eyes, trembling, perspiration, unconsciousness, etc., is condemned. They can, however, get in touch with a pure devotee of the Lord and rectify their bad habits; otherwise they shall continue to be stonehearted and unfit for any treatment. A complete progressive march on the return path home, back to Godhead, will depend on the instructions of the revealed scriptures directed by a realized devotee.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That heart which does not transform on hearing the names of the Lord, even though he shows tears in the eyes and hair standing on end, is made of iron.
Commentary

The external limbs individually and collectively have been criticized. Now the internal nature of the person indifferent to the Lord’s glories is criticized. That heart which does not transform by the many names of the Lord being chanted (gṛhyamāṇaiḥ) is iron (aśma-sāram). The transformation is described. The body hair should stand up. The Sandarbha says that if one continually chants but the heart does not melt, that is a sign of nāmāparadha. However it should not be said that simply by tears and hairs standing on end that a person has a melted heart. Rūpa Gosvāmī has said:

nisarga-picchila-svānte tad-abhyāsa-pare’pi ca | sattvābhāsaṁ vināpi syuḥ kvāpy aśru-pulakādayaḥ ||

When a person has a hard heart and practices exhibiting the sāttvika-bhāvas, without even a touch of emotion, the appearance of tears or other symptoms are called niḥsattva. BRS 2.3.89 And in devotees with very deep experience of prema, external tears and hairs standing on end may not be seen, even though they have melted hearts. Therefore this verse should be explained as follows. That heart which does not transform with chanting, but still has tears in the eyes and hairs standing on end (imitation), should be considered an iron heart. The extraordinary symptoms of transformation of the heart should be the list of items starting with kṣānti:

kṣāntir avyartha-kālatvaṁ viraktir māna-śunyatā | āśā-bandhaḥ samutkaṇṭhā nāma-gāne sadā ruciḥ || āsaktis tad-guṇākhyāne prītis tad-vasati-sthale | ity ādayo ’nubhāvāḥ syur jāta-bhāvāṅkure jane ||

The anubhāvas or characteristics of a person who has developed the bud of bhāva are as follows: tolerance, not wasting time, detachment from enjoyment, pridelessness, confidence in the Lord’s mercy, longing for the Lord, taste for chanting the name of the Lord, attachment to discussing about the Lord’s qualities, and attachment to living in the abode of the Lord. Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.3.25-6 Tears and hair standing on end are the ordinary symptoms of the heart melting. When the uttamādhikārīs who are nirmatsara chant, they will experience the sweetness of the name. In that state there will be the symptoms such as tolerance and tears. When the majority of kaniṣṭādhikārīs with matsara chant, they will not experience the sweetness of the name, and transformation of the heart will not take place. The symptoms starting with tolerance do not appear. Even though they may show tears or hairs standing on end, they should be criticized as having iron hearts. However, by association with devotees, when they pass through the stages of anartha-nivrṭti, niṣṭhā, ruci and āsakti, with time, the heart will melt, and the iron heart will dissolve. Those whose hearts melt but remain iron-like are hard to cure. This is explained in relation to sa-bīja-yoga-dhyāna in the Third Canto: evaṁ harau bhagavati pratilabdha-bhāvo bhaktyā dravad-dhṛdaya utpulakaḥ pramodāt | autkaṇṭhya-bāṣpa-kalayā muhur ardyamānas tac cāpi citta-baḍiśaṁ śanakair viyuṅkte ||

The unfortunate yogī who has developed love for the Lord, full of all sweet qualities, whose heart is somewhat soft because of devotion, whose body hairs stand on end in ecstasy, who is constantly overcome with intense tears of joy, gradually withdraws his hook-like mind from the Lord's form. SB 3.28.34

Dravad-dhṛdaya means his heart has melted. However baḍiśa (fish hook) means it is still iron since the fish hook is made of iron. The bhāva that he attains and the melting of the heart are ābhāsas or semblances only, since he gradually withdraws the mind from the Lord. Why give up the Lord who is the real goal of life? By the bhakti in this meditation, he cannot be called a devotee but a yogī since he gives pain to the limbs of the Lord, the object of his meditation, by his fish hook heart, which is hard and bent.

The ideas present here are supported later in the text:

sā vāg yayā tasya guṇān gṛṇīte karau ca tat-karma-karau manaś ca smared vasantaṁ sthira-jaṅgameṣu śṛṇoti tat-puṇya-kathāḥ sa karṇaḥ

Actual speech is that which describes the qualities of the Lord, real hands are those that work for him, a true mind is that which always remembers him dwelling within everything moving and nonmoving, and actual ears are those that listen to sanctifying topics about him. SB 10.80.3 These statements, by negative expression, confirm the necessity of practicing bhakti which is the conclusion of the scriptures.

Related verses
If the heart does not melt — eyes wet, hair standing on end — when the holy name is chanted, that heart is made of steel. The sign of bhakti is softness; the sign of stagnation is being unmoved.
Reflection Questions
  • When did chanting last actually move me — and what has been hardening since?
  • What might be softening the heart's steel: silence, association, more honest chanting, or surrender of a particular attachment?
📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.3.25

↗
अथाभिधेह्यङ्ग मनोऽनुकूलं प्रभाषसे भागवतप्रधान: । यदाह वैयासकिरात्मविद्या- विशारदो नृपतिं साधु पृष्ट: ॥ २५ ॥
athābhidhehy aṅga mano-’nukūlaṁ
[athaabhidhehy anga mano-’nukoolam]
prabhāṣase bhāgavata-pradhānaḥ
[prabhaashase bhaagavata-pradhaanah]
yad āha vaiyāsakir ātma-vidyā-
[yad aaha vaiyaasakir aatma-vidyaa-]
viśārado nṛpatiṁ sādhu pṛṣṭaḥ
[vishaarado nripatim saadhu prishtah]
atha — therefore abhidhehi — please explain aṅga — O Sūta Gosvāmī manaḥ — mind anukūlam — favorable to our mentality prabhāṣase — you do speak bhāgavata — the great devotee pradhānaḥ — the chief yat āha — what he spoke vaiyāsakiḥ — Śukadeva Gosvāmī ātma-vidyā — transcendental knowledge viśāradaḥ — expert nṛpatim — unto the King sādhu — very good pṛṣṭaḥ — being asked.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
athābhidhehy aṅga mano-’nukūlaṁ
atha
therefore
abhidhehi
please explain
aṅga
O Sūta Gosvāmī
manaḥ
mind
prabhāṣase bhāgavata-pradhānaḥ
anukūlam
favorable to our mentality
yad āha vaiyāsakir ātma-vidyā-
viśārado nṛpatiṁ sādhu pṛṣṭaḥ
prabhāṣase
you do speak
bhāgavata
the great devotee
pradhānaḥ
the chief
yat āha
what he spoke
vaiyāsakiḥ
Śukadeva Gosvāmī
ātma-vidyā
transcendental knowledge
viśāradaḥ
expert
nṛpatim
unto the King
sādhu
very good
pṛṣṭaḥ
being asked.
O Sūta Gosvāmī, your words are pleasing to our minds. Please therefore explain this to us as it was spoken by the great devotee Śukadeva Gosvāmī, who is very expert in transcendental knowledge, and who spoke to Mahārāja Parīkṣit upon being asked.

Knowledge explained by the previous ācārya like Śukadeva Gosvāmī and followed by the next like Sūta Gosvāmī is always powerful transcendental knowledge, and it is therefore penetrating and useful to all submissive students.

Thus end the Bhaktivedanta purports of the Second Canto, Third Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Pure Devotional Service: The Change in Heart.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O sage! Please tell us! You should speak according to your inclination what the greatest of devotees, Śukadeva, expert in knowledge of the Lord, spoke to the King on being asked.
Commentary

“Therefore, because of this, please tell us.” “What should I tell you?” “According to your inclination, you speak what Śukadeva said. There is nothing else to say.”

Chapter Four Śukadeva Glorifies the Lord

Sūta is asked to keep speaking because words from a true teacher about an earlier true teacher carry transcendental power. Reception of paramparā is itself a transcendental act, not just data transfer.
Reflection Questions
  • Am I treating spiritual teachings as data or as living transmission?
  • From whose lineage am I currently receiving — and how submissively am I listening?
📝 My note