FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

10.56 · The Syamantaka Jewel

42 verses · 🖨 Class prep
A Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (26101 chars)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) In Dwaraka, Krishna exhibited His strength by fighting and winning many battles, but in one unique instance, He and Balarama fled from Jarasandha Krishna’s foremost queens were Rukmini and Satyabhama, but He also married 16,100 queens after freeing them from Narakasura. Narada visited Krishna’s 16,108 palaces and was astonished by His daily activities in Dwaraka. Meanwhile, Balarama visited Gokula and enjoyed rasa-lila , and later threatened the Kurus by dragging Hastinapura towards the Yamuna.

Previous The Mood of Sri Chaitanya Next Rana-Chor Lila Last updated 1 year ago

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) In Dwaraka, Krishna exhibited His strength by fighting and winning many battles, but in one unique instance, He and Balarama fled from Jarasandha Krishna’s foremost queens were Rukmini and Satyabhama, but He also married 16,100 queens after freeing them from Narakasura. Narada visited Krishna’s 16,108 palaces and was astonished by His daily activities in Dwaraka. Meanwhile, Balarama visited Gokula and enjoyed rasa-lila , and later threatened the Kurus by dragging Hastinapura towards the Yamuna.

Previous The Mood of Sri Chaitanya Next Rana-Chor Lila Last updated 1 year ago

Balarama in Vrindavana

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Balarama in Vrindavana Chapter 65 Balarama went to visit the residents of Vrindavana for two months, consoled them in their separation from Krishna, and performed His own rasa-lila. Once, whilst intoxicated by Varuni, He commanded the Yamuna to come closer so He could bathe in her waters with the gopis . When she refused, Balarama wielded His plow and dragged her, splitting the river into hundreds of tributaries. She then apologised, and Balarama enjoyed sporting in her waters.

Previous Nriga Delivered Next Killing More Demons Last updated 2 years ago

Banasura Defeated

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Banasura Defeated Chapter 62, 63 Bali Maharaja married Rukmini’s daughter, Charumati, and had a son named Banasura. Banasura was devoted to Siva, and received the benediction that Siva would personally protect his city. With the strength of one thousand arms, his pride swelled and Siva thus predicted his downfall. Once, Banasura’s daughter, Usa, was having intimate dreams of Aniruddha, the son of Pradyumna. Usa’s maidservant, Chitralekha, identified Aniruddha and brought him there by her mystic power. Usa and Aniruddha united, but when Banasura learned of this he angrily captured that grandson of Krishna. In retaliation, Krishna and Balarama gathered the Yadava armies and attacked Banasura. After an epic duel involving Lord Siva (who had vowed to protect Banasura’s city), all but four of Banasura’s arms were severed and he finally surrendered to Krishna, who spared his life. Usa and Aniruddha were thus brought safely back to Dwaraka.

Previous Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Next Nriga Delivered Last updated 2 years ago

Dhama Comparison

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison “In Krishna Book, Srila Prabhupada beautifully describes the city of Dwaraka as follows: “Being inquisitive as to how Krishna was managing His household affairs with so many wives, Narada desired to see these pastimes and so set out to visit Krishna’s different homes. When Narada arrived in Dwaraka, he saw that the gardens and parks were full of various flowers of different colours and orchards that were overloaded with a variety of fruits. Beautiful birds were chirping, and peacocks were delightfully crowing. There were tanks and ponds full of blue and red lotus flowers, and some of these sites were filled with varieties of lilies. The lakes were full of nice swans and cranes, whose voices resounded everywhere. In the city there were as many as 900,000 great palaces built of first-class marble, with gates and doors made of silver. The posts of the houses and palaces were bedecked with jewels such as touchstone, sapphires and emeralds, and the floors gave off a beautiful luster. The highways, lanes, streets, crossings and marketplaces were all beautifully decorated. The whole city was full of residential homes, assembly houses and temples, all of different architectural beauty. All of this made Dwaraka a glowing city. The big avenues, crossings, lanes and streets, and also the thresholds of every residential house, were very clean. On both sides of every path there were bushes, and at regular intervals there were large trees that shaded the avenues so that the sunshine would not bother the passersby.”” ( SB 10.69.1-6 )

Previous Dwaraka Palaces Next The Lost City Last updated 1 year ago

Habits of Successful Pilgrims

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison Habits of Successful Pilgrims Sacred sites have to be seen with eyes of devotion. This can be difficult because externally there is heart-wrenching poverty, decrepit infrastructure and widespread pollution. Thus, it is always recommended that one visit holy places in the company of mature devotees of Krishna. They help us to go beyond superficiality and actually see the heart of these places. The Srimad-Bhagavatam offers further guidance on conducting a successful pilgrimage. In Canto Three , we learn about Vidura, who left the palaces of Hastinapura and set off on a pilgrimage to spiritually nourish himself. Elements of his attitude are described: “While so traversing the earth, he simply performed duties to please the Supreme Lord Hari. His occupation was pure and independent. He was constantly sanctified by taking his bath in holy places, although he was in the dress of a mendicant and had no hair dressing nor a bed on which to lie. Thus he was always unseen by his various relatives.” (SB 3.1.19) Independence (vivikta-vrtti) – was not thinking of business, security and maintenance, or disturbed by thoughts of what is happening back home. Sanctification (apluta) – was eager to be purified by honouring prasadam, bathing in rivers, and associating with Vaisnavas (i.e. not just sightseeing). Simplicity (adha-sayana) – embraced a life of simplicity, and accepted the austerities of pilgrimage as part of the experience to come closer to God. Detachment (avadhuta-vesa) – remained aloof to external arrangements and appearance, with a view to shifting the emphasis on internal consciousness. Unseen (alaksita) – avoided bringing attention to himself, or attracting praise, honour and respect. Alone (sva) – remained socially aloof and did not travel with others who may disturb him from his spiritual focus. Vows (vrata) – accepted spiritual vows and commitments that would give him focus on his journey. Dedication (hari-tosana) – dedicated all his time, energy and efforts toward pleasing Hari. Anyone who conducts their pilgrimage with such disposition will undoubtedly accrue great spiritual benefits on their journey.

Previous Spiritual Hubs Next The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam Last updated 1 year ago

Spiritual Hubs

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison Spiritual Hubs Places like Dwaraka are not merely historical sites, but living spiritual hubs. In the broad Vedic tradition, followers of sanatana-dharma visit four main places in India, known as the char-dhama. Badrinath in North India, Ramesvaram in South India, Jagannatha Puri in East India, and Dwaraka in West India. For Gaudiya Vaisnavas, Vrindavana, Mayapur and Jagannatha Puri are considered the primary holy places. Vrindavana is the place where Krishna performed His sweet, youthful pastimes, and revealed the most intimate aspects of His personality while relating to His confidential devotees. Though He externally left Vrindavana, the deeper understanding is that Krishna is ever-present in that land. Mayapur is the landmark of Sri Chaitanya’s appearance and early pastimes. Most notably, it’s the place where the sankirtana movement began, as the Lord gathered thousands of locals in chanting and dancing in pure love of God. Jagannatha Puri is home to the form of the Lord whose dilated eyes reveal His ecstatic remembrance of the gopis of Vrindavana. This is where Sri Chaitanya spent the second half of His life, surrounded by His confidential associates, internally relishing the esoteric emotions of Srimati Radharani. Srila Prabhupada, by his transcendental vision and desire, was able to replicate these places in the western world. He established ‘New Vrindavana,’ ‘New Mayapur,’ ‘New Jagannatha Puri,’ and many other spiritual communities, which remain great sources of spiritual inspiration even today. Every holy place carries unlimited potential to connect the sincere pilgrim with God. They are extraordinary places brimming with spiritual energy and blessings for all. Elaborate worship takes place in temples that bustle with pilgrims; constant devotional chanting fills the atmosphere at all hours. These are cities that never sleep! The daily sights and sounds remind us of God. Pilgrimages afford us the opportunity to associate with saintly people, help us develop a personal connection with God, and inspire us to go deeper into our spiritual practices. Srila Prabhupada explains that anyone who circumambulates these holy places becomes free from the cycle of repeated birth and death in this material world. In fact, all benefits derived from spiritual activities multiply manifold in these holy places. Though externally they may not seem to be the same places they were thousands of years ago, spiritually they remain untouched and ever-powerful. The holy dhama is permeated with two energies ( sakti ):

Taraka-sakti – that energy which liberates us from material attachments

Paraka-sakti – that energy which impels and draws us towards Krishna

The dhama also has a covering potency which prevents materialistic persons from perceiving its beauty and sweetness. Only with a humble spirit and sincere desire can one penetrate that covering and access the other two energies.

Previous The Lost City Next Habits of Successful Pilgrims Last updated 1 year ago

The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam After Krishna’s departure from the world, the queens of Dwaraka were feeling deep separation. They came to Vrindavana and took shelter of Vajranabha, Krishna’s great-grandson. There, in the holy dhama , they came across Kalindi, a co-wife of Krishna who seemed to be coping quite well. When they enquired how she dealt with the pain of Krishna’s departure and the subsequent separation, she explained the remedy: “When the gopis were feeling intense separation from Krishna, Uddhava pacified them with His words. So you can also go to Uddhava and request the same.” Hearing that Uddhava had been granted eternal residence in the Govardhana area, they set off to find him. In the association of Maharaja Pariksit and Vajranabha, and accompanied by a tumultuous kirtan , they arrived at Kusum Sarovar. Uddhava, who looked identical to Krishna, suddenly emerged from the groves. He empathised with the distress of the queens and explained to them that although Krishna had concluded His pastimes and left this world, He could still be seen in another way – through the narrations of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Uddhava narrated how the Lord had previously imparted the Srimad- Bhagavatam to Brahma, Vishnu and Siva, who each established their own recitals of Bhagavatam. Feeling inspired, Uddhava offered to recite Srimad- Bhagavatam to the queens. First, however, he requested Maharaja Pariksit to keep Kali at bay while the recital was going on. Maharaja Pariksit was happy to serve but disappointed by the fact that he would not be able to hear the narrations himself. Uddhava reassured him that Sukadeva Goswami would recite Srimad-Bhagavatam to him in the near future, and as a result many generations of living entities would also have that privilege too. Vajranabha remained with his mothers, and they all heard the nectarean topics flow from the mouth of Uddhava for one month. Absorbed in that sweet vibration, they became completely mesmerised, disappeared from everyone’s vision, and returned to the Supreme Abode. [ 33 ]

Previous Habits of Successful Pilgrims Next D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Last updated 1 year ago

The Lost City

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dhama Comparison The Lost City “Now due to the brahmanas ’ curse the Yadu dynasty will certainly perish by fighting among themselves; and on the seventh day from today the ocean will rise up and inundate this city of Dwaraka.” ( SB 11.7.3 ) After Krishna completed His pastimes in Dwaraka, the city disappeared below the sea and became invisible to human vision. In recent years, however, the legendary city of Dwaraka has received significant attention from historians, archaeologists and academics. Underwater excavations have revealed the remains of ancient structures, sculptures and artifacts, indicating that the accounts of the Vedic literatures are not merely mythological. Scientific analysis and carbon dating has revealed an incredible correlation between the ancient descriptions of Dwaraka, and the scientific findings of marine archaeologists. Graham Hancock, an author who has produced several documentaries on uncovering ancient civilisations, stated that the evidence was compelling: “There’s a huge chronological problem in this discovery. It means that the whole model of the origins of civilisation with which archaeologists have been working will have to be remade from scratch.”

Previous Dhama Comparison Next Spiritual Hubs Last updated 1 year ago

Dwaraka Palaces

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Dwaraka Palaces Chapter 69, 70 Dwaraka, crafted by the celestial architect, Visvakarma, was opulent beyond belief and charming in all respects. After marrying 16,108 princesses, Krishna created an exquisite palace for each one of them. Fascinated by this, Narada Muni personally went to witness Krishna’s daily activities in each palace. When Krishna saw Narada, He heartily welcomed and worshipped the sage. As Narada travelled from palace to palace he was honoured in the same way, and amazed by Krishna’s routine, which resembled that of a perfect, pious householder. Everything from fulfilling family duties, performing religious rituals, and observing social traditions was carefully honoured by the Lord. One day, news arrived of how Jarasandha had captured and imprisoned thousands of kings. They were pleading for the Lord’s merciful intervention. Simultaneously, Narada arrived with the message that the Pandavas’ were soon performing the Rajasuya sacrifice and requesting Krishna’s presence at the event. Desiring to satisfy both parties, Krishna turned to Uddhava for advice.

Previous Samba’s Marriage Next Dhama Comparison Last updated 2 years ago

History of Pradyumna

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) History of Pradyumna Chapter 55 After being burned to death by Rudra’s anger, Kamadeva was reborn as Pradyumna, the son of Krishna and Rukmini. In the maternity room, however, he was kidnapped by the demon Sambara and thrown into the ocean. A fish unexpectedly swallowed Pradyumna, and later that fish was caught and given to Sambara’s cooks. Astonishingly, they found a child in the belly, and gave him to Mayavati. Kamadeva’s previous wife, Rati, was reborn as Mayavati, and was a cook for Sambara. She was actually waiting for her husband to appear in his new body. Later, she requested Pradyumna to marry her, and advised him to also kill Sambara. Pradyumna did both, and together with his wife went to Dwaraka, where all the inhabitants were enchanted by his beauty. Rukmini was especially overjoyed to be reunited with her son.

Previous Rukmini and Krishna Next The Syamantaka Jewel Last updated 2 years ago

Killing More Demons

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Killing More Demons Chapter 66, 67 Paundraka : Illusioned by the false praise of others, this proud demon claimed to be the ‘real’ Krishna and audaciously invited the Lord for battle. Krishna journeyed to Kasi, where He found Paundraka who had incredulously imitated the Lord’s external appearance. Krishna laughed at the sight, destroyed his armies, and then cut off the imposter’s head. Kasiraja, a supporter of Paundraka, was also killed. Sudaksina : Kasiraja’s son, Sudaksina, created a fierce demon to avenge his father’s death. When the demon arrived in Dwaraka, the incredible heat of Krishna’s Sudarshan Chakra drove the demon back to Varanasi, where he killed his own creator, Sudaksina. Dvivida : This wicked ape was annoyed by Krishna’s killing of Narakasura. In retaliation, he destroyed parts of Anarta (Krishna’s province), and severely harassed the residents. Once, he encountered Balarama enjoying His pastimes, and disturbed the entire ambience with obscene gestures and vulgar behaviour. A fight ensued in which they repeatedly struck each other with uprooted trees, until Balarama eventually killed him.

Previous Balarama in Vrindavana Next Samba’s Marriage Last updated 2 years ago

Marrying Princesses

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Marrying Princesses Chapter 58, 59 When Krishna went to meet the Pandavas in Indraprastha (after their incognito exile), they had many loving interactions. During that time, Krishna accepted Kalindi as His wife and brought her back to Dwaraka. Later, Krishna married Mitravinda from Avantipura, Nagnajiti from Ayodhya, Laksmana from Madra and Bhadra from Kaikeya. Narakasura, also known as Bhaumasura, had created a series of disturbances to the demigods, and Indra thus requested Krishna’s help to kill him. Krishna first decapitated the Mura demon with His Sudarshan Chakra, and then ended the lives of his seven demoniac sons. When He confronted Narakasura, the demon launched a trident attack, but Krishna dodged it and beheaded him as well. Relieved of the burden, Goddess Bhumi profusely thanked Krishna with beautiful poetry. When the Lord freed the 16,100 imprisoned maidens from Narakasura’s palace, they all desired Him as their husband, so Krishna sent them to Dwaraka. Thereafter, Krishna went to Indraloka to acquire the parijata tree that Satyabhama desired. Despite Krishna’s recent merciful intervention to save Indra from the demons, the demigod wasn’t willing to give that tree, and Krishna had to fight him to secure it! Later, Krishna married the 16,100 princesses and provided each one with a beautiful palace.

Previous The Syamantaka Jewel Next Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Last updated 2 years ago

Nriga Delivered

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Nriga Delivered Chapter 64 Krishna’s son, Samba, once found a lizard in a well and unsuccessfully tried to rescue it. Later, however, by the transcendental touch of Krishna, the lizard transformed into a demigod. The divine being was Nriga, who, in a previous life, accidently donated the cow of one brahmana to another brahmana . Despite offering them both one hundred thousand cows to reclaim that one cow, neither brahmana was willing to relinquish it, and Nriga remained implicated. At death, Yamaraja declared that Nriga would have to live one life as a lizard. Although the punishment was harsh, he was blessed to have an audience with the Lord. Krishna thus highlighted the grave danger in unlawfully claiming a brahmana’s property.

Previous Banasura Defeated Next Balarama in Vrindavana Last updated 2 years ago

Rana-Chor Lila

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rana-Chor Lila Chapter 52 After transporting the Yadavas to Dwaraka, Krishna returned to Mathura to defeat the formidable army of Yavanas. Just then, the constantly-failing Jarasandha, arrived with yet more soldiers. Krishna made a unique decision to flee the battlefield! He and Balarama climbed to the top of Pravarsana mountain, and Jarasandha ignited a fire all around. The wicked King was convinced They were dead, but in actuality the two brothers bamboozled him by leaping to safety and mystically re-entering Dwaraka. This was yet another playful activity of the Lord, for Jarasandha would be killed in an ingenious way later.

Previous A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Next Rukmini and Krishna Last updated 2 years ago

Rukmini and Krishna

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rukmini and Krishna Chapter 52, 53, 54 Relishing the pastimes of Krishna, Maharaja Pariksit eagerly enquired about how Rukmini married Him. Sukadeva Goswami, equally as eager, narrated the dramatic story. Rukmi had planned for his sister to marry Sisupala. After repeatedly hearing about Krishna, however, Rukmini had given her heart to Him. She immediately sent a love letter requesting Krishna to kidnap her so she could become His first wife. Conquered by Rukmini’s words, Krishna immediately travelled to Vidarbha, where Damaghosa (Sisupala’s father) and Bhismaka (Rukmini’s father) had arranged for the marriage celebrations. Various kings had arrived, poised to fight anyone who attempted to disturb the ceremony. Anticipating some friction, Balarama also arrived there with His armies. A brahmana messenger arrived on the eve of the wedding and informed Rukmini that Krishna would indeed come. The next day, when Rukmini came out for a customary pre-marriage procession, Krishna expertly kidnapped her. A violent fight ensued, but the heroic Yadavas fended off all attacks and escaped with Rukmini, just as a lion captures its prey even amidst jackals. Jarasandha consoled Sisupala, but the enraged Rukmi decided to attack Krishna again. His attempt was unsuccessful, and Krishna instead captured the envious Rukmi and prepared to kill him. Rukmini hastily intervened to save her brother, and Krishna concluded the matter by cutting his hair and thus humiliating him. In this way, after a string of dramatic events, Krishna and Rukmini were finally married.

Previous Rana-Chor Lila Next History of Pradyumna Last updated 2 years ago

Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Rukmini Teased and Rukmi Killed Chapter 60, 61 Once, while she was lovingly serving Him, Krishna teased Rukmini and told her she had made a huge mistake by marrying Him. Krishna bluntly submitted that He was deficient in character, qualification and love for her. Hearing these painful words, Rukmini fainted in disbelief, overcome by unhappiness and fear. Seeing her reaction, Krishna immediately pacified her and explained He was only speaking in jest. Rukmini glorified the qualities of Krishna that had captured her mind, and Krishna subsequently expressed His deep appreciation for her. Krishna’s descendants expanded to thousands when each of His queens had ten sons. In response to Maharaja Pariksit’s enquiry, Sukadeva Goswami explained why Rukmi offered his daughter to Krishna’s son, despite their enmity. Though Rukmi was inimical to Krishna, his daughter, Rukmavati, wanted to marry Pradyumna (son of Rukmini and Krishna). Since she personally chose him, and Pradyumna valiantly fought off all the opponents, Rukmi acquiesced, and the couple eventually had a son named Aniruddha. Rukmi gave his grand- daughter in marriage to Aniruddha. After that wedding, Balarama and Rukmi played a game of dice, which led to a heated argument and the eventual death of Rukmi. Balarama then took Aniruddha and his wife to Dwaraka.

Previous Marrying Princesses Next Banasura Defeated Last updated 2 years ago

Samba’s Marriage

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) Samba’s Marriage Chapter 68 After Samba had kidnapped Duryodhana’s daughter, Laksmana, the Kaurava armies unfairly captured him and returned to Hastinapura. The Yadavas were ready to attack, but Balarama tried to diffuse the conflict with a peace proposal. Afflicted by deep-rooted pride, the Kauravas rejected it outright, and Balarama fiercely attacked them by dragging Hastinapura toward the Ganges. Terrified, the Kauravas quickly handed over Samba and Laksmana, who were duly married and sent to Dwaraka.

Previous Killing More Demons Next Dwaraka Palaces Last updated 2 years ago

The Syamantaka Jewel

Canto 10 (Part 2)

A – Astonishing Rule (52-70) The Syamantaka Jewel Chapter 56, 57 When Maharaja Pariksit enquired about the Syamantaka Jewel, Sukadeva Goswami narrated further. King Satrajit had received the Syamantaka jewel from the sun-god. Whoever possessed the jewel was blessed with wealth and wellbeing, and the King had thus installed it in his home in Dwaraka. When Krishna requested him to gift the jewel to Ugrasena, the greedy Satrajit refused. Once, Satrajit’s brother, Prasena, was travelling with the jewel. He was killed by a lion and stripped of the jewel, and the lion subsequently lost the jewel to Jambavan, who gave it to his son. Unaware of these events, Satrajit incorrectly accused Krishna of killing Prasena and taking the jewel. Krishna searched out the jewel, found it in Jambavan’s cave, and had a twenty- eight-day fight with that mighty warrior to retrieve it. Jambavan, at heart a devotee, finally accepted Krishna’s supremacy and offered Him the jewel along with his daughter, Jambavati. Krishna then returned to Dwaraka and handed the jewel back to Satrajit. Feeling remorseful, the King handed the jewel back to Krishna and offered his daughter, Satyabhama, in marriage. Krishna happily married his daughter but insisted that Satrajit keep the jewel. While Krishna was out of Dwaraka, Satadhanva, who was incited by Akrura and Krtavarma, killed Satrajit and stole the jewel. When Krishna returned, He tracked down Satadhanva and killed him, but couldn’t find the jewel since Satadhanva had left it with Akrura. Krishna eventually located it and showed it to His relatives, but then returned the troublesome jewel to Akrura.

Previous History of Pradyumna Next Marrying Princesses Last updated 2 years ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.1

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच सत्राजित: स्वतनयां कृष्णाय कृतकिल्बिष: । स्यमन्तकेन मणिना स्वयमुद्यम्य दत्तवान् ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
satrājitaḥ sva-tanayāṁ
[satraajitah sva-tanayaam]
kṛṣṇāya kṛta-kilbiṣaḥ
[krishnaaya krita-kilbishah]
syamantakena maṇinā
[syamantakena maninaa]
svayam udyamya dattavān
[svayam udyamya dattavaan]
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī said satrājitaḥ — King Satrājit sva — his own tanayām — daughter kṛṣṇāya — to Lord Kṛṣṇa kṛta — having committed kilbiṣaḥ — offense syamantakena — known as Syamantaka maṇinā — together with the jewel svayam — personally udyamya — striving dattavān — he gave .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
satrājitaḥ sva-tanayāṁ
satrājitaḥ
King Satrājit
sva
his own
tanayām
daughter
kṛṣṇāya kṛta-kilbiṣaḥ
kṛṣṇāya
to Lord Kṛṣṇa
kṛta
having committed
kilbiṣaḥ
offense
syamantakena maṇinā
syamantakena
known as Syamantaka
maṇinā
together with the jewel
svayam udyamya dattavān
svayam
personally
udyamya
striving
dattavān
he gave .
  • satrājitaḥ — King Satrājit
    The father of Satyabhāmā and devotee of Sūrya. His name (sat-rājit, 'conqueror of truth') is ironic — only after losing the jewel and his good name does he meet the real Satya in Kṛṣṇa.
  • kṛta-kilbiṣaḥ — having committed offense
    Compound: kṛta (done) + kilbiṣaḥ (sin, especially against a brāhmaṇa or the Lord). The verse opens with the offense already in the past tense — the whole chapter is the working-out of one bad thought against Bhagavān.
  • syamantakena — with the Syamantaka jewel
    The famous gem given by Sūrya, producing eight bhāras of gold daily. In the chapter's logic the jewel is a test object — wealth held tightly becomes a curse, given freely to Kṛṣṇa it becomes prasāda.
  • udyamya — striving, taking up with effort
    From ud + √yam, to lift up with exertion. Atonement is never passive in the Bhāgavata frame — Satrājit must personally carry both daughter and jewel to Kṛṣṇa. Real prāyaścitta has feet.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Having offended Lord Kṛṣṇa, Satrājit tried as best he could to atone by presenting Him with his daughter and the Syamantaka jewel.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Having offended Lord Kṛṣṇa, Satrājit tried as best he could to atone by presenting Him with his daughter and the Syamantaka jewel.
Commentary

In this chapter, Krsna, getting a bad reputation, goes to find the syamantaka jewel, receives the jewel and the daughter of Jambavan, and, on returning to Dvaraka, marries the daughter of Satrajit as well. Satrajit is sometimes spelt with "a" on the end.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Śrīdhara Svāmī mentions that after resolution of problems concerning a son, another problem is now described. The son mentioned is Pradyumna, described in relation to his mother. In answer to the question of how Kṛṣṇa married the queens, Śukadeva first describes the marriage of dear Satyabhāmā to Kṛṣṇa. The word sva indicates that this was his own daughter, given of his free will. He personally (svayam) undertook to give his daughter to Kṛṣṇa, who attracts everyone’s heart. This indicates that she had pūrva-rāga for Kṛṣṇa. Because of its lesser prema and being an incidental story occurring before the main marriage, the marriage of Jāmbavatī is narrated first.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The last chapter ended with a mention of mothers (mātaraḥ). How were they married to Kṛṣṇa? The marriage of Satyabhāmā, most dear is described first. Satrajit alone offered his daughter by his own decision or she was his only child (sva-tanayām). Kṛṣṇa was he who attracts everyone’s heart. Thus she desired to marry him also. Though it is proper to describe the marriage of Jāmbavatī, who was older, and though that marriage was a cause of this marriage, that marriage was accomplished along with the events of this marriage. This will be clear later. Or Kṛṣṇa had special prema for Satyabhāmā.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Having offended Kṛṣṇa, Satrājit tries his best to atone by presenting Him with his daughter and the Syamantaka jewel. Reparation after offense is real and material; words alone don't undo offense to the Lord.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you offer words when material reparation is what's actually needed?
  • What specific gift could atone for a specific offense you've named?

A stained cloth cannot wash itself; the offender must bring the stain to the very feet he soiled. Satrājit's daughter and jewel, carried back to Kṛṣṇa, are the cloth and the soap together — the offense itself becomes the offering when laid at Bhagavān's feet.

Bhṛgu Muni's kick on Viṣṇu's chest

When Bhṛgu Muni tested the three deities and finally kicked Viṣṇu on the chest, the Lord took the offending foot and gently pressed it, asking if the sage's tender foot had been hurt by His hard chest.

The Bhāgavatam later shows that Lakṣmī, residing on that very chest, took the kick personally and turned her face from Bhṛgu's line. Like Satrājit here, the offender must eventually return — and Kṛṣṇa, who never holds the grudge, makes the very wound the door of reunion.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.2

↗
श्रीराजोवाच सत्राजित: किमकरोद् ब्रह्मन् कृष्णस्य किल्बिष: । स्यमन्तक: कुतस्तस्य कस्माद् दत्ता सुता हरे: ॥ २ ॥
śrī-rājovāca
[shree-raajovaacha]
satrājitaḥ kim akarod
[satraajitah kim akarod]
brahman kṛṣṇasya kilbiṣaḥ
[brahman krishnasya kilbishah]
syamantakaḥ kutas tasya
[syamantakah kutas tasya]
kasmād dattā sutā hareḥ
[kasmaad dattaa sutaa hareh]
śrī - rājā — the King (Parīkṣit Mahārāja) uvāca — said satrājitaḥ — Satrājit kim — what akarot — committed brahman — O brāhmaṇa kṛṣṇasya — against Lord Kṛṣṇa kilbiṣaḥ — offense syamantakaḥ — the Syamantaka jewel kutaḥ — from where tasya — his kasmāt — why dattā — given sutā — his daughter hareḥ — to Lord Hari .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rājovāca
śrī - rājā
the King (Parīkṣit Mahārāja)
uvāca
said
satrājitaḥ kim akarod
satrājitaḥ
Satrājit
kim
what
akarot
committed
brahman kṛṣṇasya kilbiṣaḥ
brahman
O brāhmaṇa
kṛṣṇasya
against Lord Kṛṣṇa
kilbiṣaḥ
offense
syamantakaḥ kutas tasya
syamantakaḥ
the Syamantaka jewel
kutaḥ
from where
tasya
his
kasmād dattā sutā hareḥ
kasmāt
why
dattā
given
sutā
his daughter
hareḥ
to Lord Hari .
  • akarot — committed
    Imperfect of √kṛ. Parīkṣit assumes responsibility lies with the human side — Bhagavān is never the offender. Gauḍīya hermeneutics: when reading kṛṣṇa-līlā, locate the kilbiṣa in the jīva, never in the Lord.
  • kṛṣṇasya — against Lord Kṛṣṇa
    Genitive. The grammar marks Kṛṣṇa as the offended party, but the chapter will reveal that 'offense against Kṛṣṇa' is a logical impossibility from His side — He turns each offense into an occasion for marriage and gift.
  • hareḥ — to Lord Hari
    Hari — 'He who takes away' — both sins and hearts. The closing word of the question already names the resolution: when the daughter is given to Hari, the kilbiṣa is taken.
Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired: O brāhmaṇa, what did King Satrājit do to offend Lord Kṛṣṇa? Where did he get the Syamantaka jewel, and why did he give his daughter to the Supreme Lord?
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Mahārāja Parīkṣit inquired: O brāhmaṇa, what did King Satrājit do to offend Lord Kṛṣṇa? Where did he get the Syamantaka jewel, and why did he give his daughter to the Supreme Lord?
Commentary

Why he gave his daughter to the lord (hareh for haraye)?

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Where did the Syamantaka gem come from (kutaḥ)? Using the possessive case (hareḥ) instead of the dative cause (haraye) indicates that he was not too willing to give his daughter to Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

How did he offend Kṛṣṇa, the supreme Lord? Why did he give his daughter to Kṛṣṇa? Because Kṛṣṇa removes previous faults (hareḥ), no offense remains. O brahman, you know everything.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
BrahmanJiva
Parīkṣit asks: what did Satrājit do to offend, where did he get the jewel, and why give his daughter? The audience asks for the full story; chronological inquiry matters.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you accept a conclusion without asking the full backstory?
  • What three questions would unlock a current situation in your life?

Parīkṣit's question is the question every śravaṇa-attentive heart eventually asks: not 'what happened?' but 'how did this small human stumble entangle Bhagavān?' He is asking to be shown the seam where līlā touches our pettiness — and Śuka will show it.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.3

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच आसीत् सत्राजित: सूर्यो भक्तस्य परम: सखा । प्रीतस्तस्मै मणिं प्रादात् स च तुष्ट: स्यमन्तकम् ॥ ३ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
āsīt satrājitaḥ sūryo
[aaseet satraajitah sooryo]
bhaktasya paramaḥ sakhā
[bhaktasya paramah sakhaa]
prītas tasmai maṇiṁ prādāt
[preetas tasmai manim praadaat]
sa ca tuṣṭaḥ syamantakam
[sa cha tushtah syamantakam]
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī said āsīt — was satrājitaḥ — of Satrājit sūryaḥ — the sun-god bhaktasya — who was his devotee paramaḥ — the best sakhā — well-wishing friend prītaḥ — affectionate tasmai — to him maṇim — the jewel prādāt — gave saḥ — he ca — and tuṣṭaḥ — satisfied syamantakam — named Syamantaka .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
āsīt satrājitaḥ sūryo
āsīt
was
satrājitaḥ
of Satrājit
sūryaḥ
the sun-god
bhaktasya paramaḥ sakhā
bhaktasya
who was his devotee
paramaḥ
the best
sakhā
well-wishing friend
prītas tasmai maṇiṁ prādāt
prītaḥ
affectionate
tasmai
to him
maṇim
the jewel
prādāt
gave
sa ca tuṣṭaḥ syamantakam
saḥ
he
ca
and
tuṣṭaḥ
satisfied
syamantakam
named Syamantaka .
  • bhaktasya — of his devotee
    Even sūrya-bhakti is bhakti — and even a demigod rewards his bhakta. The Bhāgavata frame is generous: it acknowledges devotion at every tier, while always ranking viṣṇu-bhakti above deva-bhakti.
  • sakhā — friend, well-wisher
    Sūrya behaves as a friend to his devotee. Note: sakhya here is between deva and bhakta — the same word will later name the highest rasa of the cowherd boys with Kṛṣṇa. Same syllables, two universes apart.
  • tuṣṭaḥ — satisfied
    Past passive participle of √tuṣ. Satisfaction in the deity is the precondition of prasāda. Gauḍīya emphasis: kṛṣṇas tuṣṭi (Kṛṣṇa's satisfaction) is the only sukṛti worth chasing — Satrājit settled for Sūrya's.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Sūrya, the sun-god, felt great affection for his devotee Satrājit. Acting as his greatest friend, the demigod gave him the jewel called Syamantaka as a token of his satisfaction.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Sūrya, the sun-god, felt great affection for his devotee Satrājit. Acting as his greatest friend, the demigod gave him the jewel called Syamantaka as a token of his satisfaction.
Commentary

Though Satrajit was a respectful devotee of the sun god, the sun god was very affectionate to him, like a friend.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

“Friend” means that he continuously worshipped Sūrya, always favorable to Sūrya. Because of special worship he was dear to Sūrya. Hari-vaṁśa describes how the gem was given: tasyopatiṣṭhataḥ sūryaṁ vivasvān agrataḥ sthitaḥ | aspaṣṭa-mūrtir bhagavāṁs tejo-maṇḍalavān prabhuḥ || atha rājā vivasvantam uvāca sthitam agrataḥ | yathaiva vyomni paśyāmi sadā tvāṁ jyotiṣāṁ pate | tejo-maṇḍalinaṁ devaṁ tathaiva purataḥ sthitam | ko viśeṣo 'sti me tvattaḥ sakhyenopāgatasya vai | etac chrutvā tu bhagavān maṇi-ratnaṁ syamantakam || svakaṇṭhād avamucyaiva ekānte nyastavān vibhuḥ | tato vigrahavantaṁ taṁ dadarśa nṛpatis tadā | prītimān atha taṁ dṛṣṭvā muhūrtaṁ kṛtavān kathām | tam āha praśrito bhūyo vivasvantaṁ sa satrajit | lokān udbhāsayasy etān yena tvaṁ satataṁ prabho || tad etan maṇi-ratnaṁ me bhagavan dātum arhasi | tataḥ syamantaka-maṇiṁ dattavāṁs tasya bhāskaraḥ || When Satrājit arrived at the sun planet, Vivasvān, shining bright so that his form could not been clearly, stood before him. The king spoke to Vivasvān who was in front of him. O lord of light! Just as I see you in the sky, now I see you, shining brightly, in front of me. Having attained your friendship by worship, what is the different between you and me? Hearing this Vivasvān took from his neck the Syamantaka jewel and placed it in a separate place. Then Satrājit was able to see the form of the sun god. With affection he spoke to the sun god for some time. Satrājit, surrendered to him, spoke. You should me give the gem, by which you illuminate the planets. Then the sun god gave him the Syamantaka jewel. In his ignorance, Satrājit thought that the gem lit up the planets.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The sun god was a benefactor (sakhā) of Satrajit. Thus he gave him the jewel. He was affectionate by nature and become very satisfied by his worship. He gave the gem to him in a significant way, hanging it around his neck (prādāt). Hari-vaṁśa describes how the gem was given: tasyopatiṣṭhataḥ sūryaṁ vivasvān agrataḥ sthitaḥ | aspaṣṭa-mūrtir bhagavāṁs tejo-maṇḍalavān prabhuḥ || atha rājā vivasvantam uvāca sthitam agrataḥ | yathaiva vyomni paśyāmi sadā tvāṁ jyotiṣāṁ pate | tejo-maṇḍalinaṁ devaṁ tathaiva purataḥ sthitam | ko viśeṣo 'sti me tvattaḥ sakhyenopāgatasya vai | etac chrutvā tu bhagavān maṇi-ratnaṁ syamantakam || svakaṇṭhād avamucyaiva ekānte nyastavān vibhuḥ | tato vigrahavantaṁ taṁ dadarśa nṛpatis tadā | prītimān atha taṁ dṛṣṭvā muhūrtaṁ kṛtavān kathām | tam āha praśrito bhūyo vivasvantaṁ sa satrajit | lokān udbhāsayasy etān yena tvaṁ satataṁ prabho || tad etan maṇi-ratnaṁ me bhagavan dātum arhasi | tataḥ syamantaka-maṇiṁ dattavāṁs tasya bhāskaraḥ || When Satrājit arrived at the sun planet, Vivasvān, shining bright so that his form could not been clearly, stood before him. The king spoke to Vivasvān who was in front of him. O lord of light! Just as I see you in the sky, now I see you, shining brightly, in front of me. Having attained your friendship by worship, what is the different between you and me? Hearing this, Vivasvān took from his neck the Syamantaka jewel and placed it in a separate place. Then Satrājit was able to see the form of the sun god. With affection he spoke to the sun god for some time. Satrājit, surrendering to him, spoke. “You should me give the gem, by which you illuminate the planets.” Then the sun god gave him the Syamantaka jewel.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Sūrya felt affection for his devotee Satrājit and gave him the Syamantaka jewel as a token of satisfaction. Devotion attracts demigod gifts; even Sūrya rewards his sincere worshipers materially.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does your demigod worship include the possibility of material reward?
  • How do you receive such rewards without forgetting the source?

Sūrya gives Satrājit a jewel that produces gold — the highest gift a demigod can make. Yet a single direct request from Kṛṣṇa will soon eclipse this gift, the way a lamp pales when the master of the house enters with his torch.

Dhruva's higher gift

Young Dhruva sat down in tapasyā wanting a kingdom greater than his father's. Viṣṇu came and offered him exactly that — and Dhruva wept, ashamed that he had asked for glass when the jeweler Himself stood there.

Satrājit in this verse has accepted Sūrya's jewel happily; he has not yet learned what Dhruva learned. The chapter is, in a sense, his slow Dhruva-moment.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.4

↗
स तं बिभ्रन् मणिं कण्ठे भ्राजमानो यथा रवि: । प्रविष्टो द्वारकां राजन् तेजसा नोपलक्षित: ॥ ४ ॥
sa taṁ bibhran maṇiṁ kaṇṭhe
[sa tam bibhran manim kanthe]
bhrājamāno yathā raviḥ
[bhraajamaano yathaa ravih]
praviṣṭo dvārakāṁ rājan
[pravishto dvaarakaam raajan]
tejasā nopalakṣitaḥ
[tejasaa nopalakshitah]
saḥ — he, King Satrājit tam — that bibhrat — wearing maṇim — jewel kaṇṭhe — on his neck bhrājamānaḥ — shining brilliantly yathā — like raviḥ — the sun praviṣṭaḥ — having entered dvārakām — the city of Dvārakā rājan — O King (Parīkṣit) tejasā — because of the effulgence na — not upalakṣitaḥ — recognized .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa taṁ bibhran maṇiṁ kaṇṭhe
saḥ
he, King Satrājit
tam
that
bibhrat
wearing
maṇim
jewel
kaṇṭhe
on his neck
bhrājamāno yathā raviḥ
bhrājamānaḥ
shining brilliantly
yathā
like
raviḥ
the sun
praviṣṭo dvārakāṁ rājan
praviṣṭaḥ
having entered
dvārakām
the city of Dvārakā
rājan
O King (Parīkṣit)
tejasā nopalakṣitaḥ
tejasā
because of the effulgence
na
not
upalakṣitaḥ
recognized .
  • bhrājamānaḥ — shining brilliantly
    Present participle of √bhrāj. The verb of borrowed effulgence — used elsewhere of stars that shine only because the sun lends them light. A precise word for Satrājit's predicament.
  • tejasā — by his effulgence
    Instrumental of tejas. The same word will be used in the Gītā for Kṛṣṇa's own splendor (BG 10.36, 11.30). Here it is on loan; in Kṛṣṇa it is svarūpa-tejas, intrinsic.
  • na upalakṣitaḥ — not recognized
    The opening hint of the chapter's central pun: men carrying loaned light are mistaken for the gods themselves; only Kṛṣṇa, who never advertises, will be correctly recognized — and only by one who first fights Him to a standstill (Jāmbavān).
Wearing the jewel on his neck, Satrājit entered Dvārakā. He shone as brightly as the sun itself, O King, and thus he went unrecognized because of the jewel’s effulgence.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Wearing the jewel on his neck, Satrājit entered Dvārakā. He shone as brightly as the sun itself, O King, and thus he went unrecognized because of the jewel's effulgence.
Commentary

The citizens did not recognize that Satrajit was present( na upalaksitah), but mistook him for the sun god.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Without anyone knowing, he entered Dvārakā. Or, though he entered Dvārakā, no one recognized him.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

No one could see Satrājit. Past tense is used because the event took place before the conversation of Śukadeva and Parīkṣit. Or the event was being stated with certainty. He addresses the king in astonishment.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Titiksha (Forbearance / Endurance)Mardava (Gentleness)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Wearing the jewel, Satrājit enters Dvārakā shining as brightly as the sun and goes unrecognized due to the jewel's effulgence. Material brilliance can hide rather than reveal identity; what shines isn't always who you are.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does material brilliance you've acquired hide who you actually are?
  • How could you let identity show through ornament?

The borrowed brilliance of a jewel can make a man look like a god from a distance — but step close, and the lender's light only reveals how little of it belongs to him. Satrājit shines with Sūrya's effulgence, not his own.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.5

↗
तं विलोक्य जना दूरात्तेजसा मुष्टद‍ृष्टय: । दीव्यतेऽक्षैर्भगवते शशंसु: सूर्यशङ्किता: ॥ ५ ॥
taṁ vilokya janā dūrāt
[tam vilokya janaa dooraat]
tejasā muṣṭa-dṛṣṭayaḥ
[tejasaa mushta-drishtayah]
dīvyate ’kṣair bhagavate
[deevyate ’kshair bhagavate]
śaśaṁsuḥ sūrya-śaṅkitāḥ
[shashamsuh soorya-shankitaah]
tam — him vilokya — seeing janāḥ — the people dūrāt — from some distance tejasā — by his effulgence muṣṭa — stolen dṛṣṭayaḥ — their ability to see dīvyate — who was playing akṣaiḥ — with dice bhagavate — to the Supreme Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa śaśaṁsuḥ — they reported sūrya — the sun-god śaṅkitāḥ — presuming him .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
taṁ vilokya janā dūrāt
tam
him
vilokya
seeing
janāḥ
the people
dūrāt
from some distance
tejasā muṣṭa-dṛṣṭayaḥ
tejasā
by his effulgence
muṣṭa
stolen
dṛṣṭayaḥ
their ability to see
dīvyate ’kṣair bhagavate
dīvyate
who was playing
akṣaiḥ
with dice
bhagavate
to the Supreme Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
śaśaṁsuḥ sūrya-śaṅkitāḥ
śaśaṁsuḥ
they reported
sūrya
the sun-god
śaṅkitāḥ
presuming him .
  • muṣṭa-dṛṣṭayaḥ — whose sight was stolen
    Compound: muṣṭa (stolen) + dṛṣṭayaḥ (sights). A jewel can rob the eyes; the chapter quietly contrasts this with Kṛṣṇa, whose darśana never blinds but bestows sight.
  • dīvyate akṣaiḥ — (He) who was playing with dice
    Kṛṣṇa at leisure with His associates. The Bhāgavatam loves these domestic glimpses — Bhagavān at dice — because they show His aiśvarya never erases His madhurya. The Lord plays.
  • bhagavate — to the Supreme Lord, Śrī Kṛṣṇa
    Dative of Bhagavān — the full ṣaḍ-aiśvarya. The citizens instinctively bring the puzzle to Bhagavān, not to a sage or a king. Right reflex of a city of devotees.
As the people looked at Satrājit from a distance, his brilliance blinded them. They presumed he was the sun-god, Sūrya, and went to tell Lord Kṛṣṇa, who was at that time playing at dice.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As the people looked at Satrājit from a distance, his brilliance blinded them. They presumed he was the sun-god, Sūrya, and went to tell Lord Kṛṣṇa, who was at that time playing at dice.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The Lord was playing dice. This was an interesting feature of his human pastimes, performed with great attention. Even materialistic people would be surprised by his performing such human pastimes.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The Lord was playing dice. He was doing this without much thought, since he is the Lord, or out of great fun. Though playing among his friends, he knew everything. The people informed him. Thinking it was the sun god, they told Kṛṣṇa.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Titiksha (Forbearance / Endurance)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Mardava (Gentleness)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
People, blinded by his brilliance from a distance, presume he is Sūrya and tell Kṛṣṇa, playing dice. Even devotees confuse a bright newcomer with a deity; perception fails at distance.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you mistaken bright humans for divine beings?
  • How does distance distort discernment in your community?

A small, beloved scene: Kṛṣṇa, the Lord of the universe, is playing dice with His friends, and the city runs to Him with a problem about an unknown god. Even in His casual rolls, He is the address to which every confusion eventually comes.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.6

↗
नारायण नमस्तेऽस्तु शङ्खचक्रगदाधर । दामोदरारविन्दाक्ष गोविन्द यदुनन्दन ॥ ६ ॥
nārāyaṇa namas te ’stu
[naaraayana namas te ’stu]
śaṅkha-cakra-gadā-dhara
[shankha-chakra-gadaa-dhara]
dāmodarāravindākṣa
[daamodaraaravindaaksha]
govinda yadu-nandana
[govinda yadu-nandana]
nārāyaṇa — O Lord Nārāyaṇa namaḥ — obeisances te — unto astu — may there be śaṅkha — of the conchshell cakra — disc gadā — and club dhara — O holder dāmodara — O Lord Dāmodara aravinda - akṣa — O lotus-eyed one govinda — O Lord Govinda yadu - nandana — O darling son of the Yadus .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārāyaṇa namas te ’stu
nārāyaṇa
O Lord Nārāyaṇa
namaḥ
obeisances
te
unto
astu
may there be
śaṅkha-cakra-gadā-dhara
śaṅkha
of the conchshell
cakra
disc
gadā
and club
dhara
O holder
dāmodarāravindākṣa
dāmodara
O Lord Dāmodara
aravinda - akṣa
O lotus-eyed one
govinda yadu-nandana
govinda
O Lord Govinda
yadu - nandana
O darling son of the Yadus .
  • nārāyaṇa — O Lord Nārāyaṇa
    The cosmic name — He whose abode is the waters (nāra-ayana) and whose abode is the living beings (nāra-ayana). The opening invocation reaches for the largest of the Lord's names first.
  • dāmodara — O Dāmodara
    He whose belly (udara) was bound by a rope (dāma) — the Vraja-līlā name from chapter 10.9. Even in Dvārakā the citizens reach for the Vraja name, signalling that the same Bhagavān bound by Yaśodā stands before them.
  • aravinda-akṣa — O lotus-eyed one
    Compound: aravinda (lotus) + akṣa (eye). The name that most distinguishes Kṛṣṇa across the canto — eyes wide as lotus petals. Gauḍīya iconography fixes on these eyes as the entry point into mādhurya.
  • govinda — O Govinda
    He who gives pleasure to the cows, the senses, and the earth. The Brahmā-saṁhitā's mahā-mantra name. Even in Dvārakā the cowherd identity is the heart's name.
  • yadu-nandana — O darling son of the Yadus
    Compound: yadu (the dynasty) + nandana (delight, son). The citizens' final word reminds the Lord — and themselves — that He has chosen Yadu-kula as His family. He is theirs.
[The residents of Dvārakā said:] Obeisances unto You, O Nārāyaṇa, O holder of the conch, disc and club, O lotus-eyed Dāmodara, O Govinda, O cherished descendant of Yadu!
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[The residents of Dvārakā said:] Obeisances unto You, O Nārāyaṇa, O holder of the conch, disc and club, O lotus-eyed Dāmodara, O Govinda, O cherished descendant of Yadu!
Commentary

They caught the attention of the Lord, who was absorbed in a dice game, by chanting his names.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

In two verses, the people praise Kṛṣṇa in a general way by describing his pastimes displaying his inherent powers. O most powerful form because you give shelter to all jīvas (nārāyaṇa)! Because you have that nature you hold your conch, cakra and club to teach the wicked by your pastimes. With three phrases they praise him by describing his beautiful pastimes in Gokula, where he is controlled by prema. Controlled by your devotee you agreed to be bound around the waist (dāmodara)! You are most beautiful with lotus eyes! You are fond of herding the cows (govinda)! O revealer of great pastimes! Those were generally private pastimes, but now you are full of mercy. How can we describe this? O giver of joy to the Yadus (yadu-nandana)! You are directly present in the assembly for us to see.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

O shelter of all jīvas (nārāyaṇa)! Holder of weapons to kill the demons! O Dāmodara, who accepted rope around the waist, controlled by your devotee! Having described his qualities, his form is described. O lotus-eyed Kṛṣṇa, most beautiful! Though rarely attained, now by great mercy you are easy to attain. O Govinda, you have appeared on earth (go). You give joy to the Yadus. You always sit in their assembly. Or you are most rare, as king of Gokula (govinda). No one else resides there. But now you are available as the joy of the Yadus in Dvārakā.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Raksha (Protective Responsibility)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Obeisances, O Nārāyaṇa, holder of conch, disc, club, O lotus-eyed Dāmodara, O Govinda, cherished descendant of Yadu! Even casual citizens know how to address the Lord properly; address with multiple names is standard.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could your ordinary speech to Kṛṣṇa become more layered with proper names?
  • What casual address have you allowed to drift toward informality?

When something dazzling appears, the people of Dvārakā do not analyze it — they chant the holy names. Their prayer is a rosary of Kṛṣṇa's names strung onto a moment of fear, and the fear dissolves into the names.

Ajāmila and the name Nārāyaṇa

The fallen brāhmaṇa Ajāmila, dying and surrounded by Yamadūtas, called out 'Nārāyaṇa' — meaning his son, but invoking the Lord. Viṣṇudūtas came at once and pulled him out of hell's noose by the name alone.

The Dvārakāvāsīs in this verse do exactly what saved Ajāmila — chain together Nārāyaṇa, Dāmodara, Govinda, Yadu-nandana the moment they need help. The reflex of a devotee city is to chant before it understands.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.7

↗
एष आयाति सविता त्वां दिद‍ृक्षुर्जगत्पते । मुष्णन् गभस्तिचक्रेण नृणां चक्षूंषि तिग्मगु: ॥ ७ ॥
eṣa āyāti savitā
[esha aayaati savitaa]
tvāṁ didṛkṣur jagat-pate
[tvaam didrikshur jagat-pate]
muṣṇan gabhasti-cakreṇa
[mushnan gabhasti-chakrena]
nṛṇāṁ cakṣūṁṣi tigma-guḥ
[nrinaam chakshoomshi tigma-guh]
eṣaḥ — this āyāti — comes savitā — the sun-god tvām — You didṛkṣuḥ — wanting to see jagat - pate — O Lord of the universe muṣṇan — stealing gabhasti — of his rays cakreṇa — with the circle nṛṇām — of men cakṣūṁṣi — the eyes tigma — intense guḥ — whose radiation .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
eṣa āyāti savitā
eṣaḥ
this
āyāti
comes
savitā
the sun-god
tvāṁ didṛkṣur jagat-pate
tvām
You
didṛkṣuḥ
wanting to see
jagat - pate
O Lord of the universe
muṣṇan gabhasti-cakreṇa
muṣṇan
stealing
gabhasti
of his rays
cakreṇa
with the circle
nṛṇāṁ cakṣūṁṣi tigma-guḥ
nṛṇām
of men
cakṣūṁṣi
the eyes
tigma
intense
guḥ
whose radiation .
  • didṛkṣuḥ — wanting to see
    Desiderative of √dṛś. The grammar of desire-to-see. Gauḍīya emphasis: dṛśyate is the goal of every jīva and every demigod — and only Kṛṣṇa is fully draṣṭavya. The citizens project this rightly.
  • jagat-pate — O Lord of the universe
    Compound: jagat (universe) + pate (master, vocative). Naming the Lord by his cosmic title precisely when a cosmic deity is supposedly approaching — emphasising that Sūrya answers to Kṛṣṇa, not the reverse.
  • muṣṇan — stealing
    Present participle of √muṣ. The same root as muṣṭa-dṛṣṭayaḥ in verse 5. Borrowed light steals sight; Kṛṣṇa's darśana gives it. The chapter's vocabulary is patiently building the contrast.
Lord Savitā has come to see You, O Lord of the universe. He is blinding everyone’s eyes with his intensely effulgent rays.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Savitā has come to see You, O Lord of the universe. He is blinding everyone's eyes with his intensely effulgent rays.
Commentary

He is blinding our eyes with his network of rays (gabhasti cakrena).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

O lord of the universe! He has come, wanting to see you, disregarding seeing other people since you are most desirable, because you bestow the ultimate happiness and show yourself as a result of worship. Others are not desirable since they do not give much happiness by perfection of their worship. “But he is not the sun god.” But he blinds our eyes with his halo because of his intense rays.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The sun god desires to see you. “But he cannot give up his job of lighting up the world and come here.” O lord of the universe! You protect the universe by your light. What use is he? Or his main goal is to see his master. Or only by the mercy of the master, his desires will be fulfilled. Thus he desires to see you. “But he is not the sun god.” He dazzles our eyes because his rays are intense (tigma-guh).

Related values
Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Raksha (Protective Responsibility)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Discriminative WisdomSeva (Service / Selfless Action)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Lord Savitā has come to see You, O Lord of the universe; he is blinding everyone with his rays. Citizens narrate visible events using their best theology; sometimes that theology is wrong.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does your best theology mis-narrate visible events?
  • How do you correct misreadings without humiliating the readers?

The citizens read Sūrya as a visiting petitioner come to see Kṛṣṇa — and they have the order exactly right. Even the sun is a darśana-seeker; Kṛṣṇa is the darśana. This is the Bhāgavata reversal in one breath.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.8

↗
नन्वन्विच्छन्ति ते मार्गं त्रिलोक्यां विबुधर्षभा: । ज्ञात्वाद्य गूढं यदुषु द्रष्टुं त्वां यात्यज: प्रभो ॥ ८ ॥
nanv anvicchanti te mārgaṁ
[nanv anvichchanti te maargam]
trī-lokyāṁ vibudharṣabhāḥ
[tree-lokyaam vibudharshabhaah]
jñātvādya gūḍhaṁ yaduṣu
[jnaatvaadya goodham yadushu]
draṣṭuṁ tvāṁ yāty ajaḥ prabho
[drashtum tvaam yaaty ajah prabho]
nanu — certainly anvicchanti — they seek out te — Your mārgam — path tri - lokyām — in all the three worlds vibudha — of the wise demigods ṛṣabhāḥ — the most exalted yñātvā — knowing adya — now gūḍham — disguised yaduṣu — among the Yadus draṣṭum — to see tvām — You yāti — comes ajaḥ — the unborn (sun-god) prabho — O Lord .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nanv anvicchanti te mārgaṁ
nanu
certainly
anvicchanti
they seek out
te
Your
mārgam
path
trī-lokyāṁ vibudharṣabhāḥ
tri - lokyām
in all the three worlds
vibudha
of the wise demigods
ṛṣabhāḥ
the most exalted
yñātvā
knowing
jñātvādya gūḍhaṁ yaduṣu
adya
now
gūḍham
disguised
yaduṣu
among the Yadus
draṣṭuṁ tvāṁ yāty ajaḥ prabho
draṣṭum
to see
tvām
You
yāti
comes
ajaḥ
the unborn (sun-god)
prabho
O Lord .
  • gūḍham — disguised, hidden
    Past participle of √guh. The technical Bhāgavata term for Bhagavān's chosen concealment among His devotees. His aiśvarya is veiled by mādhurya — the very point of the avatāra.
  • yaduṣu — among the Yadus
    Locative plural. The hiding place is a family. Gauḍīya doctrine: Bhagavān's 'disguise' is never solitary — He hides inside relationships (Vraja, Yadu, Mathurā), which is precisely why bhakti is relational, not solitary.
  • tri-lokyām — in the three worlds
    Compound: tri (three) + lokyām (in the world). The cosmos searches for what one Yadu home holds. Hierarchy of value reversed — domestic over cosmic.
The most exalted demigods in the three worlds are certainly anxious to seek You out, O Lord, now that You have hidden Yourself among the Yadu dynasty. Thus the unborn sun-god has come to see You here.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The most exalted demigods in the three worlds are certainly anxious to seek You out, O Lord, now that You have hidden Yourself among the Yadu dynasty. Thus the unborn sun-god has come to see You here.
Commentary

"You should not say that the sun god wants to see me, a mere mortal." "Indeed (nanu) the best of the devatas search for you and today the sun god (ajah) has come to see you."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The best of the devatās in the three worlds like Brahmā search for the process to attain you (mārgam), but are far from that attainment. They have found out by some good fortune for certain that you, though secretive, are presently living among the Yadus. “If Brahmā and others are searching, how can the sun god come here?” He is not born since he can be said to have no beginning (ajaḥ), since he is worshipped as non-different from the soul of the universe, since he is the abode of the Lord, taking twelve forms (for the various months). Or he is the three Vedas (ajaḥ). Therefore he has excellent knowledge. O lord of all of us! We have good fortune to be your servants.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The best of the devatās in the three worlds like Brahmā search for the process to attain you (mārgam), but are far from that attainment. Nanu indicates certainty. Or they search continually for you without interest in material happiness. This indicates the rarity of attaining the Lord. They have found out by some good fortune that you, though secretive, are presently living among the Yadus. His qualification for coming to the world is indicated. You eternally appear in the world (ajaḥ). You are the best of the devas because you are eternal. O our lord (prabho)! We are fortunate to be your servants.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Exalted demigods seek You out now that You've hidden among the Yadus; thus the sun-god has come. The citizens praise the Lord's hidden presence; even hiding produces visitation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you hide yourself spiritually and still attract visitations?
  • How does Kṛṣṇa's hiding redefine what 'hidden' means?

The citizens have intuited the deepest fact: Kṛṣṇa has hidden Himself among the Yadus, and even the highest demigods come searching. Like children sure the king is in the kitchen because the smell of feasting reaches them, they know Bhagavān is here by the rasa that spills from this household.

Brahmā's hidden visit in Canto 10

Earlier in the same Canto, even Brahmā — bewildered by Kṛṣṇa's cowherd play — stole the calves and boys to test Him. Kṛṣṇa expanded into every calf and boy for a year; Brahmā returned and fell at His feet in stunned recognition.

The citizens' instinct here echoes that scene: the highest demigods do come to find Bhagavān hidden in domestic disguise. What Brahmā did in Vraja, Sūrya is imagined to do in Dvārakā.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.9

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच निशम्य बालवचनं प्रहस्याम्बुजलोचन: । प्राह नासौ रविर्देव: सत्राजिन्मणिना ज्वलन् ॥ ९ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
niśamya bāla-vacanaṁ
[nishamya baala-vachanam]
prahasyāmbuja-locanaḥ
[prahasyaambuja-lochanah]
prāha nāsau ravir devaḥ
[praaha naasau ravir devah]
satrājin maṇinā jvalan
[satraajin maninaa jvalan]
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī said niśamya — hearing bāla — childish vacanam — these words prahasya — smiling broadly ambuja — lotuslike locanaḥ — He whose eyes prāha — said na — not asau — this person raviḥ devaḥ — the sun-god satrājit — King Satrājit maṇinā — because of his jewel jvalan — glowing .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
niśamya bāla-vacanaṁ
niśamya
hearing
bāla
childish
vacanam
these words
prahasyāmbuja-locanaḥ
prahasya
smiling broadly
ambuja
lotuslike
locanaḥ
He whose eyes
prāha nāsau ravir devaḥ
prāha
said
na
not
asau
this person
raviḥ devaḥ
the sun-god
satrājin maṇinā jvalan
satrājit
King Satrājit
maṇinā
because of his jewel
jvalan
glowing .
  • bāla-vacanam — childish words
    Compound: bāla (child) + vacanam (speech). The Lord names His devotees' over-eager praise as bāla — and this is praise, not censure. Bhakti is consistently called bāla-bhāva in the Bhāgavatam; childlike, not childish.
  • prahasya — smiling broadly
    Gerund of pra + √has. The Bhāgavatam's signature verb for Kṛṣṇa's mood with devotees. He laughs often in this canto — at Brahmā, at Yaśodā, at Indra. Here at His own citizens. The smile is the answer.
  • ambuja-locanaḥ — He whose eyes are like lotuses
    Compound: ambuja (water-born, lotus) + locanaḥ (whose eyes). Returns to the eye-imagery of verse 6 — the eyes that the citizens just praised are now smiling at them. Their darśana is being returned.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: Hearing these innocent words, the lotus-eyed Lord smiled broadly and said, “This is not the sun-god, Ravi, but rather Satrājit, who is glowing because of his jewel.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued: Hearing these innocent words, the lotus-eyed Lord smiled broadly and said, "This is not the sun-god, Ravi, but rather Satrājit, who is glowing because of his jewel."
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa smiled in the beginning (pra—hasya). Then with an intention of somewhat spreading the correct view, spoke distinctly (pra—aha) with a smiling glance (ambuja-locanaḥ). He is not a devatā but only a human. At that, he is only Satrājit. Though Kṛṣṇa had the Kaustubha jewel, he spoke to reveal things according to his desire to astonish others. Śrīdhara Svāmī explains that bāla-vacanam means “words of ignorant people,” who thought that someone was the sun god who was actually not. There was a commotion because of thinking the sun god had come. They did not understand that Kṛṣṇa was supreme.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa smiled in the beginning (pra—hasya). Then with an intention of somewhat spreading the correct view, spoke distinctly (pra—aha) with a smiling glance (ambuja-locanaḥ). He is not a devatā but only a human. At that, he is only Satrājit. “Why was Satrājit appearing in this manner?” He shines because of the jewel, given by the sun god. These were the words of children (bāla-vacanam). The other inhabitants of Dvārakā could not have such ignorance.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Hearing the innocent words, the lotus-eyed Lord smiles broadly and says: 'This is not Sūrya but Satrājit glowing from his jewel.' The Lord gently corrects mistaken theology with a smile; correction is delivered as humor.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you correct with severity what could be corrected with a smile?
  • How does humor make truth easier to receive?

Kṛṣṇa's broad smile at the citizens' theology is the smile of a father correcting a beloved child's grammar — not the smile of a teacher mocking error. He prefers their over-eager devotion to any cool accuracy. Then He tells them the truth.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.10

↗
सत्राजित् स्वगृहं श्रीमत् कृतकौतुकमङ्गलम् । प्रविश्य देवसदने मणिं विप्रैर्न्यवेशयत् ॥ १० ॥
satrājit sva-gṛhaṁ śrīmat
[satraajit sva-griham shreemat]
kṛta-kautuka-maṅgalam
[krita-kautuka-mangalam]
praviśya deva-sadane
[pravishya deva-sadane]
maṇiṁ viprair nyaveśayat
[manim viprair nyaveshayat]
satrājit — Satrājit sva — his gṛham — home śrīmat — opulent kṛta — (where there were) executed kautuka — with festivity maṅgalam — auspicious rituals praviśya — entering deva - sadane — in the temple room maṇim — the jewel vipraiḥ — by learned brāhmaṇas nyaveśayat — he had installed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satrājit sva-gṛhaṁ śrīmat
satrājit
Satrājit
sva
his
gṛham
home
śrīmat
opulent
kṛta-kautuka-maṅgalam
kṛta
(where there were) executed
kautuka
with festivity
maṅgalam
auspicious rituals
praviśya deva-sadane
praviśya
entering
deva - sadane
in the temple room
maṇiṁ viprair nyaveśayat
maṇim
the jewel
vipraiḥ
by learned brāhmaṇas
nyaveśayat
he had installed .
  • deva-sadane — in the temple room
    Compound: deva (deity) + sadane (in the seat, locative of sadana). Satrājit installs the jewel where the deity should be — the chapter's quiet diagnosis. Misplaced enthronement is the structure of every fallen bhakti.
  • vipraiḥ — by learned brāhmaṇas
    Instrumental plural. The ritual is correct; the object is wrong. Vedic procedure cannot redeem a misdirected heart — a key Gauḍīya theme echoed throughout Caitanya-caritāmṛta.
  • nyaveśayat — had installed
    Causative aorist of ni + √viś. The same family of words used for prāṇa-pratiṣṭhā in temple installation. Satrājit performs the formal pratiṣṭhā of a stone — and refuses it for the Lord.
King Satrājit entered his opulent home, festively executing auspicious rituals. He had qualified brāhmaṇas install the Syamantaka jewel in the house’s temple room.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
King Satrājit entered his opulent home, festively executing auspicious rituals. He had qualified brāhmaṇas install the Syamantaka jewel in the house's temple room.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He entered his house which was naturally endowed with wealth since it was within Dvārakā and had brāhmaṇas establish the gem on a special altar in his temple room where he used to worship the sun god (deva-sadane).

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Satrājit enters his opulent home, festively executes rituals, has qualified brāhmaṇas install the jewel in the temple room. The jewel becomes an object of worship; treasure is enshrined.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'treasure' in your home is currently enshrined as object of worship?
  • Whom would you call to install it properly?

A man builds a temple inside his house, but for the wrong deity — he enthrones the jewel where Bhagavān should sit. The architecture of bhakti is exact; an inch off centre and the gold-producing gem still cannot save the house.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.11

↗
दिने दिने स्वर्णभारानष्टौ स सृजति प्रभो । दुर्भिक्षमार्यरिष्टानि सर्पाधिव्याधयोऽशुभा: । न सन्ति मायिनस्तत्र यत्रास्तेऽभ्यर्चितो मणि: ॥ ११ ॥
dine dine svarṇa-bhārān
[dine dine svarna-bhaaraan]
aṣṭau sa sṛjati prabho
[ashtau sa srijati prabho]
durbhikṣa-māry-ariṣṭāni
[durbhiksha-maary-arishtaani]
sarpādhi-vyādhayo ’śubhāḥ
[sarpaadhi-vyaadhayo ’shubhaah]
na santi māyinas tatra
[na santi maayinas tatra]
yatrāste ’bhyarcito maṇiḥ
[yatraaste ’bhyarchito manih]
dine dine — day after day svarṇa — of gold bhārān — bhāras (a measure of weight) aṣṭau — eight saḥ — it sṛjati — would produce prabho — O master (Parīkṣit Mahārāja) durbhikṣa — famine māri — untimely deaths ariṣṭāni — catastrophes sarpa — snake (bites) ādhi — mental disorders vyādhayaḥ — diseases aśubhāḥ — inauspicious na santi — there are none māyinaḥ — cheaters tatra — there yatra — where āste — it is present abhyarcitaḥ — properly worshiped maṇiḥ — the gem .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dine dine svarṇa-bhārān
dine dine
day after day
svarṇa
of gold
bhārān
bhāras (a measure of weight)
aṣṭau sa sṛjati prabho
aṣṭau
eight
saḥ
it
sṛjati
would produce
prabho
O master (Parīkṣit Mahārāja)
durbhikṣa-māry-ariṣṭāni
durbhikṣa
famine
māri
untimely deaths
ariṣṭāni
catastrophes
sarpādhi-vyādhayo ’śubhāḥ
sarpa
snake (bites)
ādhi
mental disorders
vyādhayaḥ
diseases
na santi māyinas tatra
aśubhāḥ
inauspicious
na santi
there are none
yatrāste ’bhyarcito maṇiḥ
māyinaḥ
cheaters
tatra
there
yatra
where
āste
it is present
abhyarcitaḥ
properly worshiped
maṇiḥ
the gem .
  • abhyarcitaḥ — properly worshiped
    Past participle of abhi + √arc. The jewel's power activates only when worshiped — even mundane wealth follows the law of arcanā. But the Gauḍīya correction: arcanā of objects, not Bhagavān, multiplies the obstacle.
  • māyinaḥ — deceivers, cheats
    From māyā (illusion, trickery). The jewel keeps māyāvīs out — yet the holder of the jewel will himself become the chapter's most prominent māyāvī, accusing Kṛṣṇa of theft. The protection cannot reach inward.
  • ariṣṭāni — catastrophes
    Plural of ariṣṭa. The same word used in Canto 10 for the bull-demon Ariṣṭāsura. In Kṛṣṇa's presence ariṣṭas are slain; under a jewel's protection they are merely deflected — not destroyed at the root.
Each day the gem would produce eight bhāras of gold, my dear Prabhu, and the place in which it was kept and properly worshiped would be free of calamities such as famine or untimely death, and also of evils like snake bites, mental and physical disorders and the presence of deceitful persons.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī gives the following śāstric reference concerning the bhāra: caturbhir vrīhibhir guñjāṁ guñjāḥ pañca paṇaṁ paṇān aṣṭau dharaṇam aṣṭau ca karṣaṁ tāṁś caturaḥ palam tulāṁ pala-śataṁ prāhur bhāraḥ syād viṁśatis tulāḥ “Four rice grains are called one guñjā; five guñjās, one paṇa; eight paṇas, one karṣa; four karṣas, one pala; and one hundred palas, one tulā. Twenty tulās make up one bhāra. ” Since there are about 3,700 grains of rice in an ounce, the Syamantaka jewel was producing approximately 170 pounds of gold every day.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Each day the gem would produce eight bhāras of gold, my dear Prabhu, and the place in which it was kept and properly worshiped would be free of calamities such as famine or untimely death, and also of evils like snake bites, mental and physical disorders and the presence of deceitful persons.
Commentary

Four yavas equels one gunja. Five gunjas equal one pana. Eight panas equal one dharana. Eight dharanas equal one karsa. Four karsas equal one pala. One hundred palas equals one tula. Twenty tulas equal one bhara. There can be no untimely death (mari) where this jewel is situated.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

O Parīkṣit, you are a great devotee (prabho)! Therefore you do not care for such wealth! If by chance you obtain wealth, you offer it to the Lord. Mārī is a pestilence which causes daily death in cities and towns with dense population. Māyinaḥ refers to all cheaters. The gem must be worshipped properly. Otherwise it causes great calamity. This will be explained later.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Each day the gem produces eight bhāras of gold; the place where it's kept and worshiped is free of famine, untimely death, snake bites, mental and physical distress. Properly worshiped treasure becomes self-replenishing and protective.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does your worship of a treasure produce ongoing yield?
  • How does honoring create ongoing return that misuse destroys?

The jewel banishes famine, disease, snake bite — but cannot banish the greed that holds it. It is the perfect mirror of dharmic dharma without bhakti: tidy outcomes, blocked heart.

Nala-Kūvera and Maṇigrīva's gold

The two sons of Kuvera, born to limitless wealth, became so drunk with prosperity that they sported naked in the Ganges with celestial women. Nārada cursed them into tree-shapes — only Kṛṣṇa, walking in Vraja, would liberate them.

Like Satrājit in this verse, they had a wealth-producing inheritance and lost the distinction between blessing and noose. Gold without surrender always becomes the snake bite the gold was supposed to prevent.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.12

↗
स याचितो मणिं क्व‍ापि यदुराजाय शौरिणा । नैवार्थकामुक: प्रादाद् याच्ञाभङ्गमतर्कयन् ॥ १२ ॥
sa yācito maṇiṁ kvāpi
[sa yaachito manim kvaapi]
yadu-rājāya śauriṇā
[yadu-raajaaya shaurinaa]
naivārtha-kāmukaḥ prādād
[naivaartha-kaamukah praadaad]
yācñā-bhaṅgam atarkayan
[yaachnaa-bhangam atarkayan]
saḥ — he, Satrājit yācitaḥ — requested maṇim — the gem kva api — on one occasion yadu - rājāya — for the king of the Yadus, Ugrasena śauriṇā — by Lord Kṛṣṇa na — not eva — indeed artha — after wealth kāmukaḥ — greedy prādāt — gave yācñā — of the request bhaṅgam — the transgression atarkayan — not considering .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa yācito maṇiṁ kvāpi
saḥ
he, Satrājit
yācitaḥ
requested
maṇim
the gem
kva api
on one occasion
yadu-rājāya śauriṇā
yadu - rājāya
for the king of the Yadus, Ugrasena
śauriṇā
by Lord Kṛṣṇa
naivārtha-kāmukaḥ prādād
na
not
eva
indeed
artha
after wealth
kāmukaḥ
greedy
prādāt
gave
yācñā-bhaṅgam atarkayan
yācñā
of the request
bhaṅgam
the transgression
atarkayan
not considering .
  • yācitaḥ — requested
    Past participle of √yāc, to beg. The Supreme Lord places Himself in the posture of a supplicant — and is refused. Gauḍīya theology lingers on this: Bhagavān stoops to ask because love is consensual, never coerced.
  • yācñā-bhaṅgam — the breaking of the request
    Compound: yācñā (begging, request) + bhaṅgam (breaking). A formal Sanskrit offense category — to break a yācñā is a recognized sin. Satrājit commits the textbook offense and does not even register it.
  • artha-kāmukaḥ — greedy for wealth
    Compound: artha (wealth) + kāmukaḥ (lustful). The exact diagnosis. Kāma displaced onto artha — the modern condition named in one Sanskrit compound.
  • atarkayan — not considering
    Present participle of negated √tark. Satrājit does not even think. The Bhāgavatam takes thoughtlessness as a moral category — to fail to weigh an offense to Bhagavān is itself an offense.
On one occasion Lord Kṛṣṇa requested Satrājit to give the jewel to the Yadu king, Ugrasena, but Satrājit was so greedy that he refused. He gave no thought to the seriousness of the offense he committed by denying the Lord’s request.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
On one occasion Lord Kṛṣṇa requested Satrājit to give the jewel to the Yadu king, Ugrasena, but Satrājit was so greedy that he refused. He gave no thought to the seriousness of the offense he committed by denying the Lord's request.
Commentary

Krsna requested the jewel for the treasury of King Ugrasena. . Satrajit refused without considering the effects of refusing the request of the Lord (yacna bhangam atakrayan), By not offering it to the supreme lord, but instead enjoying it himself, that object which could destroy all misfortunes would instead become the cause of all misfortunes. What then would be the offense if the lord requested it for himself and he did not give? Therefore he requested it for King Ugrasena.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa asked him to give the jewel to Ugrasena, because it was only suitable for a king. Kṛṣṇa did not want it for himself since he was indifferent to it. He only requested, without any attempt at forcefully taking it by violence, since Kṛṣṇa was a person who spread the fame of heroes (śaurinā). Satrājit however was greedy for wealth (artha), not dharma. Therefore he did not consider it a fault when he ignored the Lord’s request. Since the gem was an excellent article, Satrājit should have previous offered it on his own. But even when the Lord requested he did not give it. Satrājit did not see that it would produce great disaster for himself. The word eva indicates that repeatedly he was requested but did not give. The verb prādāt (really give) indicates that when requested, he deceived him by pretending he would give it, with such words as “Yes, let him use it.”

Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Nishkama Karma (Selfless Action)Satya (Truthfulness)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Related verses
Concepts
DharmaJiva
Kṛṣṇa requests Satrājit to give the jewel to the Yadu king Ugrasena, but Satrājit refuses out of greed — giving no thought to the offense of denying the Lord. Refusing the Lord's request, even one for someone else, is serious offense.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you refused a request that the Lord (through a guru or devotee) actually made?
  • What greed currently prevents redirecting a resource?

When Kṛṣṇa Himself asks, the answer must be 'yes' — to refuse Bhagavān a small thing is to claim ownership of something that was never yours. Satrājit hoards the gem; he loses the gem, his brother, and his reputation. The accountant of bhakti is exacting.

Bali's complete surrender

When Vāmana-deva, the dwarf-Brāhmaṇa, asked Bali Mahārāja for three steps of land, Bali — though warned by his guru — gave everything. Two steps covered all the worlds; for the third Bali offered his own head.

Bali stands as the perfect counter-image to Satrājit. When Bhagavān asks, the devotee gives more than is asked. When Bhagavān asks Satrājit for a single gem, he refuses — and the chapter records the cost of that refusal verse by verse.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.13

↗
तमेकदा मणिं कण्ठे प्रतिमुच्य महाप्रभम् । प्रसेनो हयमारुह्य मृगायां व्यचरद् वने ॥ १३ ॥
tam ekadā maṇiṁ kaṇṭhe
[tam ekadaa manim kanthe]
pratimucya mahā-prabham
[pratimuchya mahaa-prabham]
praseno hayam āruhya
[praseno hayam aaruhya]
mṛgāyāṁ vyacarad vane
[mrigaayaam vyacharad vane]
tam — that ekadā — once maṇim — the jewel kaṇṭhe — on his neck pratimucya — fixing mahā — greatly prabham — effulgent prasenaḥ — Prasena (the brother of Satrājit) hayam — a horse āruhya — mounting mṛgāyām — for hunting vyacarat — went about vane — in the forest .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam ekadā maṇiṁ kaṇṭhe
tam
that
ekadā
once
maṇim
the jewel
kaṇṭhe
on his neck
pratimucya mahā-prabham
pratimucya
fixing
mahā
greatly
prabham
effulgent
praseno hayam āruhya
prasenaḥ
Prasena (the brother of Satrājit)
hayam
a horse
āruhya
mounting
mṛgāyāṁ vyacarad vane
mṛgāyām
for hunting
vyacarat
went about
vane
in the forest .
  • prasenaḥ — Prasena
    Satrājit's brother. The proper name will become an accusation — 'Kṛṣṇa killed Prasena' — in three verses. Names in the Bhāgavatam are never decorative; this one is being set up for misuse.
  • mahā-prabham — greatly effulgent
    Compound: mahā (great) + prabham (effulgence). The same prabha that lit Satrājit; now it lights Prasena into a target. The jewel's light is a magnet for trouble — borrowed brightness always draws something.
  • mṛgāyām — for hunting
    From √mṛg, to chase. Hunting in the Mahābhārata and Bhāgavata frame is rarely innocent; it is the activity that costs Pāṇḍu his life, that costs Daśaratha Śravaṇa's curse. Prasena follows the pattern.
Once Satrājit’s brother, Prasena, having hung the brilliant jewel about his neck, mounted a horse and went hunting in the forest.

The inauspicious result of Satrājit’s refusal of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s request is about to manifest.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Once Satrājit's brother, Prasena, having hung the brilliant jewel about his neck, mounted a horse and went hunting in the forest.
Commentary

Tying the jewel around his neck (pratimucya), his brother went hunting.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He gave the gem to Prasena to fool the Lord. Viṣṇu Purāṇa explains that Satrājit understood that Kṛṣṇa would ask for the jewel and therefore, because of greed for the jewel, gave it to Prasena, his brother. Prasena covered it with a gold case in order to protect it and hide it from others and hung it around his neck. Once he went hunting, wandering about in a special manner--alone and without much ability (vy—carat).

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Once Satrājit's brother Prasena, wearing the jewel, mounts a horse and goes hunting. The Lord's request refused, consequences begin to unfold — through the brother.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do consequences of refusal land first on the people closest to you?
  • How could honoring a request protect a brother you weren't even thinking about?

A jewel meant for the temple is taken into the forest by a younger brother on horseback — wealth not surrendered to Kṛṣṇa eventually rides out alone into wild places, where the predator waits.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.14

↗
प्रसेनं सहयं हत्वा मणिमाच्छिद्य केशरी । गिरिं विशन् जाम्बवता निहतो मणिमिच्छता ॥ १४ ॥
prasenaṁ sa-hayaṁ hatvā
[prasenam sa-hayam hatvaa]
maṇim ācchidya keśarī
[manim aachchidya kesharee]
giriṁ viśan jāmbavatā
[girim vishan jaambavataa]
nihato maṇim icchatā
[nihato manim ichchataa]
prasenam — Prasena sa — along with hayam — his horse hatvā — killing maṇim — the jewel ācchidya — seizing keśarī — a lion girim — (a cave in) a mountain viśan — entering jāmbavatā — by Jāmbavān, the king of the bears nihataḥ — killed maṇim — the jewel icchatā — who wanted .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prasenaṁ sa-hayaṁ hatvā
prasenam
Prasena
sa
along with
hayam
his horse
hatvā
killing
maṇim ācchidya keśarī
maṇim
the jewel
ācchidya
seizing
keśarī
a lion
giriṁ viśan jāmbavatā
girim
(a cave in) a mountain
viśan
entering
jāmbavatā
by Jāmbavān, the king of the bears
nihato maṇim icchatā
nihataḥ
killed
maṇim
the jewel
icchatā
who wanted .
  • keśarī — lion
    Lit. 'maned one'. The same Sanskrit term that names Hanumān's father Kesarī — quietly anticipating Jāmbavān's later recognition that this is Rāma returned. The forest of this chapter is haunted by the Rāmāyaṇa.
  • jāmbavatā — by Jāmbavān
    Instrumental. The king of the bears (ṛkṣa-rāja), Hanumān's friend at the building of the bridge. His name enters the chapter as a killer of lions; he will exit as Kṛṣṇa's father-in-law and confessor. The longest narrative arc per character in the Bhāgavatam.
  • icchatā — who wanted
    Present participle of √iṣ. Even Jāmbavān, the great devotee, begins this chapter as one who wants — the gem. The Bhāgavatam will gently strip every desire from him except darśana of his Lord.
A lion killed Prasena and his horse and took the jewel. But when the lion entered a mountain cave he was killed by Jāmbavān, who wanted the jewel.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A lion killed Prasena and his horse and took the jewel. But when the lion entered a mountain cave he was killed by Jāmbavān, who wanted the jewel.
Commentary

Killing Prasena, the lion took (acchidya) the jewel.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The lion killed Prasena because violence was its nature. It took the jewel because it was most valuable. Such actions of collecting curious items are seen in mice and other animals.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The lion killed Prasena because it was very strong and amazing. Jambavān killed the lion, tearing him apart with his nails (nihataḥ).

Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Bhakti (Devotion)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Vinaya (Humility / Modesty)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
A lion kills Prasena and his horse and takes the jewel; entering a cave, the lion is killed by Jāmbavān, who wanted the jewel. The chain of takings from violence is rapid; once the jewel is no longer in proper hands, it kills successively.
Reflection Questions
  • What resource in your life has begun a chain of takings because it was withheld from rightful use?
  • How do you stop a 'jewel-chain' before it kills more carriers?

A chain of greed: man wants gem, lion wants man, bear wants gem from lion. Every link except the last is killed by the next. The Bhāgavatam diagrams saṁsāra in a single forest scene.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.15

↗
सोऽपि चक्रे कुमारस्य मणिं क्रीडनकं बिले । अपश्यन् भ्रातरं भ्राता सत्राजित् पर्यतप्यत ॥ १५ ॥
so ’pi cakre kumārasya
[so ’pi chakre kumaarasya]
maṇiṁ krīḍanakaṁ bile
[manim kreedanakam bile]
apaśyan bhrātaraṁ bhrātā
[apashyan bhraataram bhraataa]
satrājit paryatapyata
[satraajit paryatapyata]
saḥ — he, Jāmbavān api — moreover cakre — made kumārasya — for his child maṇim — the jewel krīḍanakam — a toy bile — in the cave apaśyan — not seeing bhrātaram — his brother bhrātā — the brother satrājit — Satrājit paryatapyata — became deeply troubled .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’pi cakre kumārasya
maṇiṁ krīḍanakaṁ bile
apaśyan bhrātaraṁ bhrātā
satrājit paryatapyata
saḥ
he, Jāmbavān
api
moreover
cakre
made
kumārasya
for his child
maṇim
the jewel
krīḍanakam
a toy
bile
in the cave
apaśyan
not seeing
bhrātaram
his brother
bhrātā
the brother
satrājit
Satrājit
paryatapyata
became deeply troubled .
  • krīḍanakam — a toy, plaything
    From √krīḍ, to play. The Bhāgavata's favourite verb-cluster — līlā, krīḍā — names Kṛṣṇa's whole activity. The jewel finally enters the krīḍā-frame, no longer an investment. It has been redeemed by becoming a toy.
  • bile — in the cave
    Locative of bila. Caves in the Bhāgavatam are sites of revelation — Hiraṇyākṣa's, Kapila's, now Jāmbavān's. Going deep underground is the iconography of going deep within.
  • paryatapyata — became deeply troubled
    Imperfect of pari + √tap. The same root tapas — but here tap is suffering, not austerity. The two are continuous: Satrājit's hoarding has caused his own tapas — only the wrong kind.
Within the cave Jāmbavān let his young son have the Syamantaka jewel as a toy to play with. Meanwhile Satrājit, not seeing his brother return, became deeply troubled.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Within the cave Jāmbavān let his young son have the Syamantaka jewel as a toy to play with. Meanwhile Satrājit, not seeing his brother return, became deeply troubled.
Commentary

Those people who were of similar evil nature heard this and whispered about it to each other (ajapan).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The gem served as a toy for Jāmbavān’s son, who was in the cave.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Jāmbavān gives the Syamantaka to his young son as a toy; Satrājit, not seeing his brother return, becomes deeply troubled. The world's greatest jewel becomes a child's plaything; meanwhile family worry begins.
Reflection Questions
  • Where has someone in your life made a 'toy' of what was given as serious responsibility?
  • What worry has begun in your circle that you've not yet acknowledged?

The most precious jewel in the three worlds becomes a baby's rattle in a bear-cave — a tableau worth its own dhyāna. What humans hoard, the children of devotees use as toys. The jewel's career has dignified itself only now.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.16

↗
प्राय: कृष्णेन निहतो मणिग्रीवो वनं गत: । भ्राता ममेति तच्छ्रुत्वा कर्णे कर्णेऽजपन् जना: ॥ १६ ॥
prāyaḥ kṛṣṇena nihato
[praayah krishnena nihato]
maṇi-grīvo vanaṁ gataḥ
[mani-greevo vanam gatah]
bhrātā mameti tac chrutvā
[bhraataa mameti tach chrutvaa]
karṇe karṇe ’japan janāḥ
[karne karne ’japan janaah]
prāyaḥ — probably kṛṣṇena — by Kṛṣṇa nihataḥ — killed maṇi — the jewel grīvaḥ — wearing on his neck vanam — to the forest gataḥ — gone bhrātā — brother mama — my iti — thus saying tat — that śrutvā — hearing karṇe karṇe — in one another’s ears ajapan — whispered janāḥ — the people .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
prāyaḥ kṛṣṇena nihato
prāyaḥ
probably
kṛṣṇena
by Kṛṣṇa
nihataḥ
killed
maṇi-grīvo vanaṁ gataḥ
maṇi
the jewel
grīvaḥ
wearing on his neck
vanam
to the forest
gataḥ
gone
bhrātā mameti tac chrutvā
bhrātā
brother
mama
my
iti
thus saying
tat
that
śrutvā
hearing
karṇe karṇe ’japan janāḥ
karṇe karṇe
in one another’s ears
ajapan
whispered
janāḥ
the people .
  • karṇe karṇe ajapan — they whispered in one another's ears
    Repetition of karṇa (ear) + ajapan (from √jap). Jap normally means silent recitation of a mantra; here perverted into gossip. The Bhāgavatam uses the same root for the highest practice and its shadow — choose which jap fills your karṇa.
  • prāyaḥ — probably
    The single most damning syllable in the chapter. The accusation is hedged — 'probably' — and yet it spreads as if certain. Suspicion masquerading as caution is the texture of vaiṣṇava-aparādha.
  • kṛṣṇena nihataḥ — killed by Kṛṣṇa
    Instrumental + past participle. The grammatical form of slander. The Lord who killed Pūtanā and Kaṁsa is now accused of killing a man over a gem — the same verb, the same agent, the offense is in the imputed motive.
He said, “Kṛṣṇa probably killed my brother, who went to the forest wearing the jewel on his neck.” The general populace heard this accusation and began whispering it in one another’s ears.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
He said, "Kṛṣṇa probably killed my brother, who went to the forest wearing the jewel on his neck." The general populace heard this accusation and began whispering it in one another's ears.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Prāyaḥ (probably) indicates that he speculated in this way because, though Kṛṣṇa had great power, he had asked for the gem but had been refused. Satrājit’s followers, not everyone in Dvārakā, spread gossip, since in the First Canto the inhabitants are described as having great devotion to Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

As a brother, Satrājit had great affection for Prasena. Not seeing him he lamented. He assumed Kṛṣṇa took it because he was the Lord or because he had asked for it. He must have killed him by cutting off his head (nihataḥ). His followers in the city began to speak rumors.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Satrājit says: Kṛṣṇa probably killed my brother who wore the jewel; the populace whispers this. Accusation by the offender against the Lord; rumor amplifies fear into theology.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you accused the Lord (or His representatives) when your own offense was the cause?
  • How does honest acknowledgment of your offense replace blaming others?

A whispered accusation against Bhagavān travels faster than truth — and lodges in the public ear, where it festers. The chapter shows that even Kṛṣṇa's reputation among His own citizens is not auto-protected; bhakti must be actively defended, and only by Bhagavān Himself.

Jaya and Vijaya at Vaikuṇṭha's gate

When the Four Kumāras were turned away at Vaikuṇṭha's gate by Jaya and Vijaya, their curse fell — three births as demons. The offense was not a violent act but a slight against devotees with Bhagavān's tacit name.

Satrājit's whisper here is the same category of subtle offense. The Bhāgavatam consistently shows that whispers, suspicions and accusations against Kṛṣṇa or His devotees carry weight as heavy as the jewel itself.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.17

↗
भगवांस्तदुपश्रुत्य दुर्यशो लिप्तमात्मनि । मार्ष्टुं प्रसेनपदवीमन्वपद्यत नागरै: ॥ १७ ॥
bhagavāṁs tad upaśrutya
[bhagavaams tad upashrutya]
duryaśo liptam ātmani
[duryasho liptam aatmani]
mārṣṭuṁ prasena-padavīm
[maarshtum prasena-padaveem]
anvapadyata nāgaraiḥ
[anvapadyata naagaraih]
bhagavān — the Supreme Lord, Kṛṣṇa tat — that upaśrutya — coming to hear duryaśaḥ — infamy liptam — smeared ātmani — upon Himself mārṣṭum — in order to clean away prasena - padavīm — the path taken by Prasena anvapadyata — He followed nāgaraiḥ — together with people of the city .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhagavāṁs tad upaśrutya
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord, Kṛṣṇa
tat
that
upaśrutya
coming to hear
duryaśo liptam ātmani
duryaśaḥ
infamy
liptam
smeared
ātmani
upon Himself
mārṣṭuṁ prasena-padavīm
mārṣṭum
in order to clean away
prasena - padavīm
the path taken by Prasena
anvapadyata nāgaraiḥ
anvapadyata
He followed
nāgaraiḥ
together with people of the city .
  • duryaśaḥ — infamy, bad reputation
    Compound: duḥ (bad) + yaśas (fame). The opposite of yaśas, which the Bhāgavatam treats as one of Bhagavān's six aiśvaryas. To smear yaśas is to attack svarūpa — and yet the Lord chooses to address it with feet and patience.
  • liptam ātmani — smeared upon Himself
    Compound idea: lipta (smeared) + ātmani (upon Himself, locative). The poetics suggests dirt on a cloth. The Lord whose nature is pure does not pretend the smear isn't there — He goes to wash it.
  • mārṣṭum — to clean away
    Infinitive of √mṛj, to wipe clean. The same family of words used in 40-42 (mṛjāmi). The chapter pivots on this verb — Kṛṣṇa cleans His own name; Satrājit must clean his.
When Lord Kṛṣṇa heard this rumor, He wanted to remove the stain on His reputation. So He took some of Dvārakā’s citizens with Him and set out to retrace Prasena’s path.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Lord Kṛṣṇa heard this rumor, He wanted to remove the stain on His reputation. So He took some of Dvārakā's citizens with Him and set out to retrace Prasena's path.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

When Kṛṣṇa with all the assembly heard this second hand (upa—śrutya), through Uddhava and others, he followed Prasena’s path with the citizens.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Hearing the rumor, Kṛṣṇa wants to remove the stain on His reputation; He takes citizens with Him and sets out to retrace Prasena's path. Even the Lord acts to clear His name; reputation matters to mission.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you neglect to clear your name when truth would benefit your mission?
  • What 'tracing the path' is yours to do?

Bhagavān could clear His name with a word — but He chooses the slow path: walk the actual forest, follow the actual hoof-prints. The Lord defends His glory by becoming a detective. Even His apologetics is līlā.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.18

↗
हतं प्रसेनं अश्वं च वीक्ष्य केशरिणा वने । तं चाद्रिपृष्ठे निहतमृक्षेण दद‍ृशुर्जना: ॥ १८ ॥
hataṁ prasenaṁ aśvaṁ ca
[hatam prasenam ashvam cha]
vīkṣya keśariṇā vane
[veekshya kesharinaa vane]
taṁ cādri-pṛṣṭhe nihatam
[tam chaadri-prishthe nihatam]
ṛkṣeṇa dadṛśur janāḥ
[rikshena dadrishur janaah]
hatam — killed prasenam — Prasena aśvam — his horse ca — and vīkṣya — seeing keśariṇā — by a lion vane — in the forest tam — that (lion) ca — also adri — of a mountain pṛṣṭhe — on the side nihatam — killed ṛkṣeṇa — by Ṛkṣa (Jāmbavān) dadṛśuḥ — they saw janāḥ — the people .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hataṁ prasenaṁ aśvaṁ ca
hatam
killed
prasenam
Prasena
aśvam
his horse
ca
and
vīkṣya keśariṇā vane
vīkṣya
seeing
keśariṇā
by a lion
vane
in the forest
taṁ cādri-pṛṣṭhe nihatam
tam
that (lion)
ca
also
adri
of a mountain
pṛṣṭhe
on the side
nihatam
killed
ṛkṣeṇa dadṛśur janāḥ
ṛkṣeṇa
by Ṛkṣa (Jāmbavān)
dadṛśuḥ
they saw
janāḥ
the people .
  • ṛkṣeṇa — by Ṛkṣa (Jāmbavān)
    Instrumental of ṛkṣa, 'bear'. Jāmbavān is repeatedly called ṛkṣa-rāja, king of the bears. Bears in the Rāmāyaṇa fought alongside Hanumān's monkeys for Rāma — the same species now fights Rāma's later avatāra. The text is layering identity.
  • vīkṣya — seeing
    Gerund of vi + √īkṣ. The Lord and citizens together see — public witness, not private claim. The Bhāgavatam consistently legitimates dharma through shared darśana.
  • janāḥ — the people
    Nominative plural. The citizens themselves see the evidence — the rumour cannot survive their eyes. Bhakti restored by saṅkīrtana-style public witness.
In the forest they found Prasena and his horse, both killed by the lion. Further on they found the lion dead on a mountainside, slain by Ṛkṣa [Jāmbavān].
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
In the forest they found Prasena and his horse, both killed by the lion. Further on they found the lion dead on a mountainside, slain by Ṛkṣa [Jāmbavān].
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They concluded a lion had killed Prasena and his horse by examining the evidence (vi—ikṣya). The people then saw on top of the mountain inhabited by Jāmbavān the lion (tam) killed by Jāmbavān. Thus Kṛṣṇa was cleared of the accusations.

Related values
Prema (Divine Love)Bhakti (Devotion)
Concepts
RasaJiva
They find Prasena and his horse killed by the lion; further on, the lion dead, slain by Ṛkṣa. Each step of investigation confirms the sequence; the truth emerges as the path is walked.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you stop at the first dead body and miss the second?
  • How does patient investigation reveal what one stop wouldn't?

The forensic line of the forest tells its own story: a body, a horse, a dead lion. Truth left to itself leaves a trail; the Lord need only walk it slowly to expose the whisper. Saṁsāra is loud, but the actual evidence is quiet.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.19

↗
ऋक्षराजबिलं भीममन्धेन तमसावृतम् । एको विवेश भगवानवस्थाप्य बहि: प्रजा: ॥ १९ ॥
ṛkṣa-rāja-bilaṁ bhīmam
[riksha-raaja-bilam bheemam]
andhena tamasāvṛtam
[andhena tamasaavritam]
eko viveśa bhagavān
[eko vivesha bhagavaan]
avasthāpya bahiḥ prajāḥ
[avasthaapya bahih prajaah]
ṛkṣa - rāja — of the king of the bears bilam — the cave bhīmam — terrifying andhena tamasā — by blinding darkness āvṛtam — covered ekaḥ — alone viveśa — entered bhagavān — the Supreme Lord avasthāpya — stationing bahiḥ — outside prajāḥ — the citizens .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ṛkṣa-rāja-bilaṁ bhīmam
ṛkṣa - rāja
of the king of the bears
bilam
the cave
bhīmam
terrifying
andhena tamasāvṛtam
andhena tamasā
by blinding darkness
āvṛtam
covered
eko viveśa bhagavān
ekaḥ
alone
viveśa
entered
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
avasthāpya bahiḥ prajāḥ
avasthāpya
stationing
bahiḥ
outside
prajāḥ
the citizens .
  • bhīmam — terrifying
    From √bhī, to fear. The cave is named by its affect on entrants. The Lord enters fear willingly — a Bhāgavata sūtra of grace: He goes where His devotee is not yet able to follow.
  • andhena tamasā — by blinding darkness
    Compound: andha (blind) + tamasā (by darkness). The very phrase used in the Iśopaniṣad for the result of avidyā. Kṛṣṇa entering andha-tamas is the iconography of avatāra into ignorance to retrieve a soul.
  • ekaḥ — alone
    Even with all of Dvārakā with Him, Bhagavān enters alone. The decisive encounter is always one-to-one — Jāmbavān will meet Bhagavān without an audience, as every soul ultimately must.
The Lord stationed His subjects outside the terrifying, pitch-dark cave of the king of the bears, and then He entered alone.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord stationed His subjects outside the terrifying, pitch-dark cave of the king of the bears, and then He entered alone.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

In order to retrieve the jewel so that he could summon Satrājit and give it back, he followed the tracks of Jāmbavān to the cave. The cave was terrifying because of the darkness (andhena) and because it was related to Jāmbavān, an ape. Because of this he stationed the people of Dvārakā at the mouth of the cave since he is an ocean of mercy (bhagavān).

Related values
Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Raksha (Protective Responsibility)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Discriminative WisdomSeva (Service / Selfless Action)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The Lord stations subjects outside the pitch-dark cave of the bear king and enters alone. Some entrances are made alone; companions wait outside.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could you enter a difficult cave alone while having companions wait?
  • What truth is yours to seek without spectators?

Bhagavān leaves the city outside and enters the dark cave alone. This is every interior crisis of the devotee — the noise outside cannot enter; only Kṛṣṇa Himself goes into the dark place. Even rescue is private.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.20

↗
तत्र द‍ृष्ट्वा मणिप्रेष्ठं बालक्रीडनकं कृतम् । हर्तुं कृतमतिस्तस्मिन्नवतस्थेऽर्भकान्तिके ॥ २० ॥
tatra dṛṣṭvā maṇi-preṣṭhaṁ
[tatra drishtvaa mani-preshtham]
bāla-krīḍanakaṁ kṛtam
[baala-kreedanakam kritam]
hartuṁ kṛta-matis tasminn
[hartum krita-matis tasminn]
avatasthe ’rbhakāntike
[avatasthe ’rbhakaantike]
tatra — there dṛṣṭvā — seeing maṇi - preṣṭham — the most precious of jewels bāla — of a child krīḍanakam — the plaything kṛtam — made hartum — to take it away kṛta - matiḥ — deciding tasmin — there avatasthe — He placed Himself arbhaka - antike — near the child .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatra dṛṣṭvā maṇi-preṣṭhaṁ
tatra
there
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
maṇi - preṣṭham
the most precious of jewels
bāla-krīḍanakaṁ kṛtam
bāla
of a child
krīḍanakam
the plaything
kṛtam
made
hartuṁ kṛta-matis tasminn
hartum
to take it away
kṛta - matiḥ
deciding
tasmin
there
avatasthe ’rbhakāntike
avatasthe
He placed Himself
arbhaka - antike
near the child .
  • maṇi-preṣṭham — the most precious of jewels
    Compound: maṇi (jewel) + preṣṭha (most beloved). Preṣṭha is a charged Gauḍīya word — usually used for Kṛṣṇa Himself or His most beloved devotees. Here it is used for the gem; the chapter quietly winks at the displacement.
  • kṛta-matiḥ — deciding, with mind set
    Compound: kṛta (made) + matiḥ (mind). Even the Lord's actions are decisional — He does not seize on impulse. Bhakti reflects this: surrender is a kṛta-mati, a chosen orientation, not a mood.
  • arbhaka-antike — near the child
    Compound: arbhaka (child) + antike (near, locative). Bhagavān places Himself near a child — His characteristic location across the canto. The chapter quietly reasserts vātsalya geography even in Dvārakā exile.
There Lord Kṛṣṇa saw that the most precious of jewels had been made into a child’s plaything. Determined to take it away, He approached the child.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
There Lord Kṛṣṇa saw that the most precious of jewels had been made into a child's plaything. Determined to take it away, He approached the child.
Commentary

Krsna saw the jewel, which had become a toy for the child.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Within the cave (tatra), seeing the jewel made into a toy, he decided to wait for an opportunity to take it, since searching for it was finished.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Kṛṣṇa sees the precious jewel made into a child's plaything; determined to take it, He approaches the child. The Lord goes directly to the holder; recovery starts with whoever currently has the asset.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could you go directly to the current holder of something misplaced?
  • How do you handle the awkwardness of asking back what is rightfully yours?

Kṛṣṇa walks into a bear-cave and sees a child playing with the universe's most precious jewel — the same Kṛṣṇa who once let cowherd boys mistake gems for berries. He recognises the scene; He has been on the child's side of it before.

The boys eating fruits, the gems lost in Vraja

In earlier Canto 10 līlā, Kṛṣṇa's cowherd friends ate forest berries, while the Brāhmaṇas' more 'precious' offerings went uneaten. The Bhāgavatam consistently inverts the value-hierarchy — childish eating beats ritual gravity.

Here the same inversion: the rarest jewel made into a child's toy. Kṛṣṇa's mood is recognition, not theft — He sees His own Vraja-rasa in this bear-child's play.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.21

↗
तमपूर्वं नरं द‍ृष्ट्वा धात्री चुक्रोश भीतवत् । तच्छ्रुत्वाभ्यद्रवत् क्रुद्धो जाम्बवान् बलिनां वर: ॥ २१ ॥
tam apūrvaṁ naraṁ dṛṣṭvā
[tam apoorvam naram drishtvaa]
dhātrī cukrośa bhīta-vat
[dhaatree chukrosha bheeta-vat]
tac chrutvābhyadravat kruddho
[tach chrutvaabhyadravat kruddho]
jāmbavān balināṁ varaḥ
[jaambavaan balinaam varah]
tam — that apūrvam — never before (seen) naram — person dṛṣṭvā — seeing dhātrī — the nurse cukrośa — cried out bhīta - vat — afraid tat — that śrutvā — hearing abhyadravat — ran toward kruddhaḥ — angry jāmbavān — Jāmbavān balinām — of the strong varaḥ — the best .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tam apūrvaṁ naraṁ dṛṣṭvā
tam
that
apūrvam
never before (seen)
naram
person
dṛṣṭvā
seeing
dhātrī cukrośa bhīta-vat
dhātrī
the nurse
cukrośa
cried out
bhīta - vat
afraid
tac chrutvābhyadravat kruddho
tat
that
śrutvā
hearing
abhyadravat
ran toward
kruddhaḥ
angry
jāmbavān balināṁ varaḥ
jāmbavān
Jāmbavān
balinām
of the strong
varaḥ
the best .
  • apūrvam — never before (seen)
    Compound: a (not) + pūrvam (before). The nurse intuits what Jāmbavān cannot yet — this person has never been seen because He is not a person of the seen order. The Bhāgavatam often gives the deeper recognition to the lowliest character.
  • balinām varaḥ — the best of the strong
    Compound: balinām (of the strong, genitive plural) + varaḥ (best). Jāmbavān's epithet from the Rāmāyaṇa — strongest of bears who lifted Hanumān and counselled the army. Bhāgavata reuses Rāmāyaṇa diction to remind us who this is.
  • kruddhaḥ — angry
    From √krudh. The first emotion of the great devotee toward his Lord — wrong recognition produces krodha. The Bhāgavatam will spend twenty-eight days draining it; only then comes jñāna.
The child’s nurse cried out in fear upon seeing that extraordinary person standing before them. Jāmbavān, strongest of the strong, heard her cries and angrily ran toward the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The child's nurse cried out in fear upon seeing that extraordinary person standing before them. Jāmbavān, strongest of the strong, heard her cries and angrily ran toward the Lord.
Commentary

As if out of fear of seeing a human form (bhitavat), the nurse began to cry. She was not even aware of his desire of taking the jewel. Actually, it was not real fear, for seeing the lord is naturally a cause of jubilation.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The nurse saw the human who was astonishing because of his great strength and beauty. Though Kṛṣṇa was gentle she became worried because of his unannounced entrance. She would not be frightened by a relative or known person entering. Jāmbavān came running to face him.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Seeing the astonishing or unique person—completely different from anyone else, the nurse cried out as if afraid. She actually had no fear, by the influence of Jāmbavān. Or the word iva is just a manner of expression with no particular meaning. She was afraid. Jāmbavān was angry and ran towards Kṛṣṇa since he was the best of strong persons.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The child's nurse cries out in fear at the extraordinary person; Jāmbavān hears and runs angrily toward the Lord. Decisive approach activates resistance from the holder's protectors.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose protector responds when you go to claim what someone is misusing?
  • How do you manage the protector while the negotiation happens with the principal?

A nurse's cry is the small alarm by which the great devotee is woken — Jāmbavān does not recognise Bhagavān yet; he hears only that a stranger is near the child. Many a sādhaka first meets Bhagavān as 'an intruder near my project'.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.22

↗
स वै भगवता तेन युयुधे स्वामिनात्मन: । पुरुषं प्राकृतं मत्वा कुपितो नानुभाववित् ॥ २२ ॥
sa vai bhagavatā tena
[sa vai bhagavataa tena]
yuyudhe svāmīnātmanaḥ
[yuyudhe svaameenaatmanah]
puruṣam prākṛtaṁ matvā
[purusham praakritam matvaa]
kupito nānubhāva-vit
[kupito naanubhaava-vit]
saḥ — he vai — indeed bhagavatā — with the Lord tena — with Him yuyudhe — fought svāmīnā — master ātmanaḥ — his own puruṣam — a person prākṛtam — mundane matvā — thinking Him kupitaḥ — angry na — not anubhāva — of His position vit — aware .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa vai bhagavatā tena
saḥ
he
vai
indeed
bhagavatā
with the Lord
tena
with Him
yuyudhe svāmīnātmanaḥ
yuyudhe
fought
svāmīnā
master
ātmanaḥ
his own
puruṣam prākṛtaṁ matvā
puruṣam
a person
prākṛtam
mundane
matvā
thinking Him
kupito nānubhāva-vit
kupitaḥ
angry
na
not
anubhāva
of His position
vit
aware .
  • puruṣam prākṛtam — a mundane person
    Compound idea: puruṣa (person) + prākṛtam (made of prakṛti, mundane). The exact category-error the Gītā warns against (BG 9.11). Mistaking Bhagavān for prākṛta puruṣa is the root mūrkhatā of every age.
  • svāmīnā — with (his) master
    Instrumental. The narrator's correction inside the verse itself — Jāmbavān fights, but the Bhāgavata reminds us he fights his own svāmī. The grammar holds the truth even when the character cannot.
  • anubhāva-vit — aware of His position
    Compound: anubhāva (glory, position) + vit (knower) — negated by 'na'. Anubhāva is the technical term for the manifest signs of Bhagavān's identity. Jāmbavān is, for the moment, anubhāva-blind. The fight is the means of restoration.
Unaware of His true position and thinking Him an ordinary man, Jāmbavān angrily began fighting with the Supreme Lord, his master.

The words puruṣaṁ prākṛtaṁ matvā, “thinking Him a mundane person,” are very significant. So-called Vedic scholars, including most Western ones, enjoy translating the word puruṣam as “man” even when the word refers to Lord Kṛṣṇa, and thus their unauthorized translations of Vedic literature are tainted by their materialistic conceptions of the Godhead. However, here it is clearly stated that it was because Jāmbavān misunderstood the Lord’s position that he considered Him prākṛta-puruṣa, “a mundane person.” In other words, the Lord is actually puruṣottama, “the ultimate transcendental person.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Unaware of His true position and thinking Him an ordinary man, Jāmbavān angrily began fighting with the Supreme Lord, his master.
Commentary

In fighting with the weak demons like Canura, Kamsa, and Jarasandha, Krsna did not get much satisfaction. In order to get full satisfaction in fighting, the lord therefore desired to fight with his own servant who had similar strength, his devotee Jambavan. As well, since his devotee Jambavan had not been fully satisfied in vira rasa by fighting with the troops of Ravana, Krsna wanted to satisfy him now. In order to fulfill both his and Jambavan's desires, he thus covered his sweet aspect from Jambavan by his lila sakti, through the power of his yoga maya. Thus Jambavan though of him as an ordinary human.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He fought with the Lord, whose aṁśa was Rāma. Jāmbavān considered Brahman in human form (puruṣam) to be an ordinary material person (prākrṭam) since he did not bother to consider his powers (na anubhava-vit). He became angry because of loss of discriminating powers.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He fought with Kṛṣṇa, endowed with all powers (bhagavatā), and his own master. During Rāma’s Appearance, he served Rāma because he was by nature a devotee. He took him as an ordinary human because he was angry, because he did not know Kṛṣṇa’s power (na anubhāva-vit). Or fought because he lost his intelligence because of anger.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Yoga
Unaware of His true position, thinking Him an ordinary man, Jāmbavān angrily fights the Lord, his master. So-called devotees can find themselves on the wrong side when they don't recognize the Lord in unexpected form.
Reflection Questions
  • Where might you be fighting the Lord without recognizing Him?
  • What unexpected form has He recently taken that you've resisted?

A servant of Rāma, not knowing this is the same Rāma, raises arms against Him. Jāmbavān has been waiting for his Lord for an age — and almost misses Him because the form is different. The Bhāgavatam's quiet teaching: the form may change, but the offer of conflict is always misrecognition.

Arjuna at Kṛṣṇa's death-feet

In the Mahābhārata, when Arjuna realises Kṛṣṇa is leaving the world, he weeps that he had not recognized his sārathi as Bhagavān every moment — the casualness of their friendship suddenly looks like blindness.

Jāmbavān here is in the same blindness, but with fists raised. The Bhāgavatam will let him finish the fight before letting him weep.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.23

↗
द्वन्द्वयुद्धं सुतुमुलमुभयोर्विजिगीषतो: । आयुधाश्मद्रुमैर्दोर्भि: क्रव्यार्थे श्येनयोरिव ॥ २३ ॥
dvandva-yuddhaṁ su-tumulam
[dvandva-yuddham su-tumulam]
ubhayor vijigīṣatoḥ
[ubhayor vijigeeshatoh]
āyudhāśma-drumair dorbhiḥ
[aayudhaashma-drumair dorbhih]
kravyārthe śyenayor iva
[kravyaarthe shyenayor iva]
dvandva — paired yuddham — the fight su - tumulam — very furious ubhayoḥ — between the two of them vijigīṣatoḥ — who both were striving to win āyudha — with weapons aśma — stones drumaiḥ — and trees dorbhiḥ — with their arms kravya — carrion arthe — for the sake śyenayoḥ — between two hawks iva — as if .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dvandva-yuddhaṁ su-tumulam
dvandva
paired
yuddham
the fight
su - tumulam
very furious
ubhayor vijigīṣatoḥ
ubhayoḥ
between the two of them
vijigīṣatoḥ
who both were striving to win
āyudhāśma-drumair dorbhiḥ
āyudha
with weapons
aśma
stones
drumaiḥ
and trees
dorbhiḥ
with their arms
kravyārthe śyenayor iva
kravya
carrion
arthe
for the sake
śyenayoḥ
between two hawks
iva
as if .
  • dvandva-yuddham — single combat
    Compound: dvandva (pair, duality) + yuddham (fight). The same word dvandva names the dualities of saṁsāra (heat/cold, pleasure/pain) in the Gītā. Jāmbavān's combat is the bodily form of all dvandva — and Kṛṣṇa is on the other side of every pair.
  • vijigīṣatoḥ — of the two desiring to win
    Desiderative dual genitive of √ji. Both want to win; only one can — and the loser will discover that losing to Kṛṣṇa is the only true victory. Gauḍīya doctrine: parājaya before Bhagavān is the highest jaya.
  • śyenayoḥ iva — like two hawks
    Dual of śyena (hawk) + iva (like). Hawks fighting over kravya (carrion) — the Bhāgavatam's mock-heroic frame for the conflict. The cosmic struggle has the dignity, and the absurdity, of a roadside scrap.
The two fought furiously in single combat, each determined to win. Contending against each other with various weapons and then with stones, tree trunks and finally their bare arms, they struggled like two hawks battling over a piece of flesh.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The two fought furiously in single combat, each determined to win. Contending against each other with various weapons and then with stones, tree trunks and finally their bare arms, they struggled like two hawks battling over a piece of flesh.
Commentary

They fought like two hawks fighting for flesh.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Two verses go together. The fight lasted for twenty-eight days (verb in next verse). The fighting was intense (sutumulam), without cessation of attack because each desired strongly to win, the Lord out of excitement of pastimes and Jāmbavān out of pride in his great strength. They used each of their two arms.

Concepts
Jiva
The two fight furiously, with weapons, then stones, tree trunks, finally bare arms — like two hawks over flesh. Combat escalates through tool exhaustion to bare body; everything is used.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you used everything and gone to bare arms in a conflict?
  • How do you discern when to keep going and when to lay down weapons?

Two hawks fighting over a piece of meat — the Bhāgavata's chosen image for Bhagavān and devotee locked in misrecognized combat. Even this fight is recorded with a smile, because Kṛṣṇa Himself supplied the simile.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.24

↗
आसीत्तदष्टाविंशाहमितरेतरमुष्टिभि: । वज्रनिष्पेषपरुषैरविश्रममहर्निशम् ॥ २४ ॥
āsīt tad aṣṭā-vimśāham
[aaseet tad ashtaa-vimshaaham]
itaretara-muṣṭibhiḥ
[itaretara-mushtibhih]
vajra-niṣpeṣa-paruṣair
[vajra-nishpesha-parushair]
aviśramam ahar-niśam
[avishramam ahar-nisham]
āsīt — was tat — that aṣṭā - viṁśa — twenty-eight aham — days itara - itara — with one another’s muṣṭibhiḥ — fists vajra — of lightning niṣpeṣa — like the blows paruṣaiḥ — hard aviśramam — without pause ahaḥ - niśam — day and night .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
āsīt tad aṣṭā-vimśāham
āsīt
was
tat
that
aṣṭā - viṁśa
twenty-eight
aham
days
itaretara-muṣṭibhiḥ
itara - itara
with one another’s
muṣṭibhiḥ
fists
vajra-niṣpeṣa-paruṣair
vajra
of lightning
niṣpeṣa
like the blows
paruṣaiḥ
hard
aviśramam ahar-niśam
aviśramam
without pause
ahaḥ - niśam
day and night .
  • aṣṭā-viṁśa — twenty-eight
    Compound: aṣṭā (eight) + viṁśa (twenty). The same number that names this very Canto (10) and chapter (56) sequence in some reckonings; 28 ahas of fight is a deliberate, almost ritual count — long enough to exhaust the great devotee fully.
  • muṣṭibhiḥ — with fists
    Instrumental plural of muṣṭi. Bare fists — no weapons, no māyā. This is the simplest possible combat, body to body. Kṛṣṇa engages His devotee with no trick, no aiśvarya — only steady contact.
  • vajra-niṣpeṣa — like the blows of lightning
    Compound: vajra (lightning, also Indra's weapon) + niṣpeṣa (crushing blow). The same vajra that Indra wielded against Vṛtra in the Bhāgavatam. Jāmbavān throws Indra-grade blows; Kṛṣṇa receives them as if they were rose-petals — until Jāmbavān realises whom he is hitting.
  • aviśramam — without pause
    Compound: a (not) + viśrama (rest). Bhagavān's tirelessness in receiving the devotee's confusion — this is one of the chapter's most tender doctrinal images. He never tires of being mistaken; He simply waits.
The fight went on without rest for twenty-eight days, the two opponents striking each other with their fists, which fell like the cracking blows of lightning.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī points out that the fight continued day and night without intermission.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The fight went on without rest for twenty-eight days, the two opponents striking each other with their fists, which fell like the cracking blows of lightning.
Commentary

They fought for twenty eight days (asta vimsaham), both day and night (ahanisam). They fought without even a moment's rest, with blows as hard as striking (nispesa) of thunderbolts.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They also used both fists since, because of fighting many days, all weapons were destroyed. Or they did not have much respect for weapons. They also continued day and night without rest.

Concepts
Jiva
The fight continues without rest for twenty-eight days, fists falling like lightning. Some battles take long times to settle even when both parties are determined; duration is part of the test.
Reflection Questions
  • What 28-day inner battle are you currently in?
  • How do you sustain without rest until resolution arrives?

Twenty-eight days of fists like lightning — Bhagavān could end this in a syllable, but He lets the devotee tire himself completely. Sometimes grace's longest mercy is to outlast our resistance until we collapse into recognition.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.25

↗
कृष्णमुष्टिविनिष्पातनिष्पिष्टाङ्गोरुबन्धन: । क्षीणसत्त्व: स्विन्नगात्रस्तमाहातीव विस्मित: ॥ २५ ॥
kṛṣṇa-muṣṭi-viniṣpāta
[krishna-mushti-vinishpaata]
niṣpiṣṭāṅgoru bandhanaḥ
[nishpishtaangoru bandhanah]
kṣīṇa-sattvaḥ svinna-gātras
[ksheena-sattvah svinna-gaatras]
tam āhātīva vismitaḥ
[tam aahaateeva vismitah]
kṛṣṇa - muṣṭi — of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s fists viniṣpāta — by the blows niṣpiṣṭa — pummeled aṅga — of whose body uru — huge bandhanaḥ — the muscles kṣīṇa — diminished sattvaḥ — whose strength svinna — perspiring gātraḥ — whose limbs tam — to Him āha — he spoke atīva — extremely vismitaḥ — astonished .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kṛṣṇa-muṣṭi-viniṣpāta
kṛṣṇa - muṣṭi
of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s fists
viniṣpāta
by the blows
niṣpiṣṭāṅgoru bandhanaḥ
niṣpiṣṭa
pummeled
aṅga
of whose body
uru
huge
bandhanaḥ
the muscles
kṣīṇa-sattvaḥ svinna-gātras
kṣīṇa
diminished
sattvaḥ
whose strength
svinna
perspiring
gātraḥ
whose limbs
tam āhātīva vismitaḥ
tam
to Him
āha
he spoke
atīva
extremely
vismitaḥ
astonished .
  • kṣīṇa-sattvaḥ — whose strength is diminished
    Compound: kṣīṇa (diminished) + sattva (strength, also the guṇa of clarity). The exhaustion of one's own balam is the opening of another seeing. Gauḍīya emphasis: bhakti often begins where self-strength ends — exactly the Bhāgavatam's repeated pattern (Gajendra, Draupadī, Bhīṣma).
  • svinna-gātraḥ — whose limbs are perspiring
    Compound: svinna (perspiring) + gātra (limb). Sweat as the body's white-flag. The bodily sign of effort and surrender at once — the Bhāgavatam will use the same word-field for the gopīs' rasa-laden labour.
  • vismitaḥ — astonished
    Past participle of vi + √smi. Astonishment is the rasa that marks the breaking-in of Bhagavān's true form. Gauḍīya rasa-śāstra calls vismaya the foundational rasa of adbhuta — the wonder that turns into worship.
His bulging muscles pummeled by the blows of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s fists, his strength faltering and his limbs perspiring, Jāmbavān, greatly astonished, finally spoke to the Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
His bulging muscles pummeled by the blows of Lord Kṛṣṇa's fists, his strength faltering and his limbs perspiring, Jāmbavān, greatly astonished, finally spoke to the Lord.
Commentary

His huge muscles were beaten by Krsna. He considered, who can be stronger than me except Rama? Remembering those old thoughts, with surprise, he concluded that this must be his lord.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa beat him in a special manner: by using two fists without noise, and while using one fist with a huge noise. Jāmbavān was most astonished because he had not seen such abilities manifested in even Rāma.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Sattva
Jāmbavān's bulging muscles pummeled, strength faltering, limbs perspiring, he finally — astonished — speaks to the Lord. Exhaustion produces recognition; one breaks down before the obvious truth appears.
Reflection Questions
  • What exhaustion is preparing recognition in your current battle?
  • Where could surrender follow honest pummeling?

The great bear's body finally remembers its limits — and in that exhaustion, jñāna rises like a deferred dawn. The Bhāgavatam is unsentimental: the bear had to be emptied of his strength before he could be filled with his Lord.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.26

↗
जाने त्वां सर्वभूतानां प्राण ओज: सहो बलम् । विष्णुं पुराणपुरुषं प्रभविष्णुमधीश्वरम् ॥ २६ ॥
jāne tvāṁ saṛva-bhūtānāṁ
[jaane tvaam sariva-bhootaanaam]
prāṇa ojaḥ saho balam
[praana ojah saho balam]
viṣṇuṁ purāṇa-puruṣaṁ
[vishnum puraana-purusham]
prabhaviṣṇum adhīśvaram
[prabhavishnum adheeshvaram]
jāne — I know tvām — You (to be) sarva — of all bhūtānām — living beings prāṇaḥ — the life air ojaḥ — the sensory strength sahaḥ — the mental strength balam — the physical strength viṣṇum — Lord Viṣṇu purāṇa — primeval puruṣam — the Supreme Person prabhaviṣṇum — all-powerful adhīśvaram — the supreme controller .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jāne tvāṁ saṛva-bhūtānāṁ
jāne
I know
tvām
You (to be)
sarva
of all
bhūtānām
living beings
prāṇa ojaḥ saho balam
prāṇaḥ
the life air
ojaḥ
the sensory strength
sahaḥ
the mental strength
balam
the physical strength
viṣṇuṁ purāṇa-puruṣaṁ
viṣṇum
Lord Viṣṇu
purāṇa
primeval
puruṣam
the Supreme Person
prabhaviṣṇum adhīśvaram
prabhaviṣṇum
all-powerful
adhīśvaram
the supreme controller .
  • prāṇaḥ — the life air
    From √an (to breathe). Bhagavān is named first as the breath of every living being — the most intimate possible recognition. Gauḍīya pranāma-mantras begin from this fact: He is closer than the breath.
  • viṣṇum — Lord Viṣṇu
    Accusative of Viṣṇu — 'He who pervades'. Jāmbavān names Him not 'Kṛṣṇa' first but 'Viṣṇu' — reaching for the most cosmic name his Rāmāyaṇa-era memory can supply. The chapter's tattva-pivot.
  • purāṇa-puruṣam — the primeval Person
    Compound: purāṇa (ancient, original) + puruṣam (Person). The same epithet the Vedānta-sūtra and Gītā use for the Supreme. Jāmbavān is reciting standard tattva because he has finally tasted it — vedānta breaks out of his mouth.
  • adhīśvaram — the supreme controller
    Compound: adhi (over, supreme) + īśvaram (controller). Above all īśvaras — devas, rulers, demigods. Jāmbavān places Kṛṣṇa above the very Sūrya whose jewel started this entire chapter.
[Jāmbavān said:] I know now that You are the life air and the sensory, mental and bodily strength of all living beings. You are Lord Viṣṇu, the original person, the supreme, all-powerful controller.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[Jāmbavān said:] I know now that You are the life air and the sensory, mental and bodily strength of all living beings. You are Lord Viṣṇu, the original person, the supreme, all-powerful controller.
Commentary

If all the prana of all the living entities of all the billions of universes were brought together, and if all the strengths of all the senses (oja), mind (saha) and bodies (bala) were brought together, I know it all as you alone, since all of that is just your vibhuti. Thus how can your strength be countered by the strength of one entity like me? It is like Garuda being challenged by a butterfly. You are Visnu, the pervader of all, and I am a single pervaded person. You are the ancient person, and I am the young person. You are endowed with all power (prabha visnum), and I am without power. You are the controller of all(adisvaram) and I am the controlled.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

You have inconceivable powers (prabhaviṣṇum) and the controller of all (adhīśvaram). Realizing his great strength her first praises him because of his great powers. I have the ability to know this because of the following. He then recites the verse. He is said to be the prānā, ojas, saha and bala because he is non-different from his śaktis. He is shown to be the antaryāmī puruṣa pervading the jīvas (viṣṇum). He pervades everything as purāṇa-puruṣa, the totality of all things (Garbhodakaśāyī). And he pervades prakṛt (prabhaviṣṇu). He has greater power than that however. He has power of all the spiritual realms (adhīśvaram). He has power over everything. This means he is Svayam Bhagavān.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Realizing Kṛṣṇa’s great strength, Jāmbavān first praised him for his great power. I always know you (jāne), or have known you continuously as the life air of all jīvas, which maintains their bodies or you are simply their life. I know you as the sensory, mental and bodily strength of all living beings. Since he is the source of all these items, he is considered non-different from them. By your śakti you spread everywhere (viṣṇum). You exist before Brahmā and others (purāṇa-puruṣam). You are famous as Viṣṇu. Vāmana is excluded. You always have fresh powers (prabhaviṣṇum). You are the original controller. Brahmā and others are excluded. The terms are in order of increasing power.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
I know now You are the life air and the sensory, mental, bodily strength of all beings; You are Viṣṇu, the original Person, supreme controller. Defeat clarifies who is the source of strength.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does losing teach you about the source of strength better than winning would?
  • What confession has been waiting at the end of long combat?

Jāmbavān recognises Bhagavān as the very prāṇa of his own breath — the one he has been fighting was the one breathing him through the fight. Every blow he gave was lent its force by the recipient. The recognition is total.

Hanumān's recognition in Sundara-kāṇḍa

When Hanumān first leapt to Laṅkā, he did not know whether the deity he sought was form or formless. Sītā's chastity, Rāvaṇa's pride, Vibhīṣaṇa's surrender — each meeting deepened his recognition.

Jāmbavān, Hanumān's old companion, makes the same recognition here in the cave — but now of Kṛṣṇa as the same Rāma whose army he once led. The line 'I know You as Viṣṇu, the original Person' is the bear's Hanumān-moment in a new yuga.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.27

↗
त्वं हि विश्वसृजां स्रष्टा सृष्टानामपि यच्च सत् । काल: कलयतामीश: पर आत्मा तथात्मनाम् ॥ २७ ॥
tvaṁ hi viśva-sṛjām sraṣṭā
[tvam hi vishva-srijaam srashtaa]
sṛṣṭānām api yac ca sat
[srishtaanaam api yach cha sat]
kālaḥ kalayatām īśaḥ
[kaalah kalayataam eeshah]
para ātmā tathātmanām
[para aatmaa tathaatmanaam]
tvam — You hi — indeed viśva — of the universe sṛjām — of the creators sraṣṭā — the creator sṛṣṭānām — of created entities api — also yat — which ca — and sat — underlying substance kālaḥ — the subduer kalayatām — of subduers īśaḥ — the Supreme Lord paraḥ ātmā — the Supreme Soul tathā — also ātmanām — of all souls .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tvaṁ hi viśva-sṛjām sraṣṭā
tvam
You
hi
indeed
viśva
of the universe
sṛjām
of the creators
sraṣṭā
the creator
sṛṣṭānām api yac ca sat
sṛṣṭānām
of created entities
api
also
yat
which
ca
and
sat
underlying substance
kālaḥ kalayatām īśaḥ
kālaḥ
the subduer
kalayatām
of subduers
īśaḥ
the Supreme Lord
para ātmā tathātmanām
paraḥ ātmā
the Supreme Soul
tathā
also
ātmanām
of all souls .
  • viśva-sṛjām sraṣṭā — creator of the creators of the universe
    Compound: viśva (universe) + sṛj (create), genitive plural + sraṣṭā (creator). Above Brahmā, above all demiurges. Gauḍīya: even Brahmā is a sṛj; only Kṛṣṇa is the sṛṣṭā of the sṛṣṭā.
  • kālaḥ kalayatām — the subduer of subduers
    Compound idea: kāla (time) + kalayatām (of those who measure/devour, genitive plural participle). The same line Bhīṣma echoes in his death-prayer to Kṛṣṇa. Time devours all; only the Lord of Time devours Time.
  • paraḥ ātmā — the Supreme Soul
    Compound: paraḥ (supreme) + ātmā (Self). The Paramātmā doctrine in one breath — same Self as the jīva's ātman but supreme. Jāmbavān is reciting Upaniṣadic vedānta to the very Lord of the Upaniṣads.
You are the ultimate creator of all creators of the universe, and of everything created You are the underlying substance. You are the subduer of all subduers, the Supreme Lord and Supreme Soul of all souls.

As Lord Kapila states in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (3.25.42) : mṛtyuś carati mad-bhayāt. “Death himself moves about out of fear of Me.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You are the ultimate creator of all creators of the universe, and of everything created You are the underlying substance. You are the subduer of all subduers, the Supreme Lord and Supreme Soul of all souls.
Commentary

You are the creator of the creators of the universe, and I am only the creation of Brahma. You are the cause of all the entities (sat) created within the universe, and Brahma and other creators of the universes are not the cause. Brahma. They are creators only n the sense of secondary creators. Of destroyers you are the destroyer (kala), capable of doing it (isa). I however am to be destroyed by the destroyer. Among all atmas you are the supreme atma. I am one jiva.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Because you are the prāṇa, ojas, and bala of all beings you are the creator of all creators of the universe. Because you pervade the jīvas (viṣṇum) you are the root svarūpa (ātmā) of the ātmā. Because you pervade all of creation (samaṣṭi) as Garbhodakaśāhī (purāṇa-puruṣam) you are called īśaḥ. Because you are in control of prakṛti (prabha-viṣṇum) and because you are in control of all the spiritual realms (adhīśvaram) you are the subduer of subduers. Para ātmā means the root svarūpa. Or in the previous verse, the five descriptive elements are further explained. Since (hi) you are the instigator of dull, almost dead matter such as sūtra and ahaṅkāra (viśva-sṛjām), you are the creator of Brahmā and other created beings (sṛṣṭānām) and you are the material cause--upādāna (yac ca) known as Garbhodakaśāyī with the lotus coming from his navel. And because of this you are the instigator (kālaḥ) of all instigators (kalayatām) within each of many universes. Because of such influence you are the supreme controller (para īśaḥ). And because of this you are the supreme source (ātmā), Svayam Bhagavān, of all jīvas and other forms of the Lord (ātmānam).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

You alone (hi) are the creator of the universe, of Brahmā or the elements. You are the cause (sat) of all creations. You are time among controllers (kalayatām). Thus you are the supreme Lord. Tathā means all this. Thus you are the ātmā or antaryāmī of all jīvas.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Atma
You are the ultimate creator of all creators, the underlying substance of all created, the subduer of all subduers, Supreme Lord and Soul of souls. Theological titles cascade once recognition lands.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does a single recognition unleash a flood of accurate naming in your devotional speech?
  • What confession of His titles would mark your next turning point?

Time consumes everything, but Time has a Lord — and that Lord is the one I have been hitting. Jāmbavān's stuti walks the chain of beings upward and finds, at the top, the figure standing in front of him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.28

↗
यस्येषदुत्कलितरोषकटाक्षमोक्षै- र्वर्त्मादिशत् क्षुभितनक्रतिमिङ्गलोऽब्धि: । सेतु: कृत: स्वयश उज्ज्वलिता च लङ्का रक्ष:शिरांसि भुवि पेतुरिषुक्षतानि ॥ २८ ॥
yasyeṣad-utkalita-roṣa-kaṭākṣa-mokṣair
[yasyeshad-utkalita-rosha-kataaksha-mokshair]
vartmādiśat kṣubhita-nakra-timiṅgalo ’bdhiḥ
[vartmaadishat kshubhita-nakra-timingalo ’bdhih]
setuḥ kṛtaḥ sva-yaśa ujjvalitā ca laṅkā
[setuh kritah sva-yasha ujjvalitaa cha lankaa]
rakṣaḥ-śirāṁsi bhuvi petur iṣu-kṣatāni
[rakshah-shiraamsi bhuvi petur ishu-kshataani]
yasya — whose īṣat — slightly utkalita — manifested roṣa — from the anger kaṭā - akṣa — of sidelong glances mokṣaiḥ — because of the release vartma — a way ādiśat — showed kṣubhita — agitated nakra — (in which) the crocodiles timiṅgalaḥ — and huge timiṅgila fish abdhiḥ — the ocean setuḥ — a bridge kṛtaḥ — made sva — His own yaśaḥ — fame ujjvalitā — set ablaze ca — and laṅkā — the city of Laṅkā rakṣaḥ — of the demon (Rāvaṇa) śirāṁsi — the heads bhuvi — to the ground petuḥ — fell iṣu — by whose arrows kṣatāni — cut off .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yasyeṣad-utkalita-roṣa-kaṭākṣa-mokṣair
yasya
whose
vartmādiśat kṣubhita-nakra-timiṅgalo ’bdhiḥ
īṣat
slightly
utkalita
manifested
roṣa
from the anger
setuḥ kṛtaḥ sva-yaśa ujjvalitā ca laṅkā
kaṭā - akṣa
of sidelong glances
mokṣaiḥ
because of the release
vartma
a way
ādiśat
showed
rakṣaḥ-śirāṁsi bhuvi petur iṣu-kṣatāni
kṣubhita
agitated
nakra
(in which) the crocodiles
timiṅgalaḥ
and huge timiṅgila fish
abdhiḥ
the ocean
setuḥ
a bridge
kṛtaḥ
made
sva
His own
yaśaḥ
fame
ujjvalitā
set ablaze
ca
and
laṅkā
the city of Laṅkā
rakṣaḥ
of the demon (Rāvaṇa)
śirāṁsi
the heads
bhuvi
to the ground
petuḥ
fell
iṣu
by whose arrows
kṣatāni
cut off .
  • kaṭā-akṣa — sidelong glance
    Compound: kaṭa (side) + akṣa (eye). The famous kaṭākṣa of Rāma against the ocean — and of Kṛṣṇa against the gopīs. Same eye, two rasas. Jāmbavān names the kaṭākṣa that built the bridge — the same eye now looks at him.
  • setuḥ kṛtaḥ — made a bridge
    Compound idea: setu (bridge) + kṛta (made). The Setu of Rāmeśvaram — the bridge Jāmbavān himself helped build. The verse contains his own autobiographical proof: this is the Lord I served.
  • laṅkā — the city of Laṅkā
    Laṅkā — burned by Hanumān, conquered by Rāma. Jāmbavān cites the very city he helped to besiege, from his own friend Hanumān's exploit. Memory of līlā is itself a stuti.
  • rakṣaḥ-śirāṁsi — the demon's heads
    Compound: rakṣas (demon, here Rāvaṇa) + śirāṁsi (heads, plural). Rāvaṇa's ten heads. The chapter quietly confirms Rāma-Kṛṣṇa-aikya — one Bhagavān across two avatāras.
You are He who impelled the ocean to give way when His sidelong glances, slightly manifesting His anger, disturbed the crocodiles and timiṅgila fish within the watery depths. You are He who built a great bridge to establish His fame, who burned down the city of Laṅkā, and whose arrows severed the heads of Rāvaṇa, which then fell to the ground.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
You are He who impelled the ocean to give way when His sidelong glances, slightly manifesting His anger, disturbed the crocodiles and timiṅgila fish within the watery depths. You are He who built a great bridge to establish His fame, who burned down the city of Laṅkā, and whose arrows severed the heads of Rāvaṇa, which then fell to the ground.
Commentary

By throwing your slightly angry glance, the ocean, filled with agitated crocodiles and timilinga fish, gave you a path. You built a bridge as well, which is your very fame. You burned down Lanka and, cut off by your arrows, the heads of Ravanawhich fell to the ground. I recognise that you are that Lord.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though Hanumān burned (ujjvalitā) Laṅkā, it was because of Rāma’s powers. Or Rāma caused Laṅkā to be burned. Since you are like this you are my worshipable Rāma. Or though Rāma is merciful to persons like me in the following manner, you only are like this. Your arrows severed the heads of Rāvaṇa and other Rākṣasas.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
You are He who impelled the ocean to give way with angry glances, built the bridge to fame, burnt the city of the enemy. Jāmbavān remembers his service in Rāma's earlier līlā; recognition includes memory of long past.
Reflection Questions
  • What past life of service might suddenly inform your recognition of the Lord?
  • How does collective memory across time deepen worship?

Mid-stuti, Jāmbavān slips and names Rāmacandra — the bridge, Laṅkā, Rāvaṇa's heads. He cannot quite tell whether he is praising Rāma or Kṛṣṇa. He is, in fact, praising both — and the Bhāgavatam lets the slip stand as doctrine.

Hanumān's persistence in Rāma-bhajana

Even after Rāma's avatāra ended, Hanumān refused to leave the world — he remained, the tradition says, in every kalpa where Rāma's name is sung. Caitanya-caritāmṛta records his unwavering rāma-bhakti as the model of niṣṭhā.

Jāmbavān, Hanumān's friend, holds the same niṣṭhā in his bones — and here, recognising Rāma in Kṛṣṇa, he can finally hand his daughter to his Lord without breaking faith with his older devotion. The Bhāgavatam settles the apparent conflict by collapsing it: same Bhagavān, two forms.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.29-30

↗
इति विज्ञातविज्ञानमृक्षराजानमच्युत: । व्याजहार महाराज भगवान् देवकीसुत: ॥ २९ ॥ अभिमृश्यारविन्दाक्ष: पाणिना शंकरेण तम् । कृपया परया भक्तं मेघगम्भीरया गिरा ॥ ३० ॥
iti vijñāta-viijñānam
[iti vijnaata-viijnaanam]
ṛkṣa-rājānam acyutaḥ
[riksha-raajaanam achyutah]
vyājahāra mahā-rāja
[vyaajahaara mahaa-raaja]
bhagavān devakī-sutaḥ
[bhagavaan devakee-sutah]
abhimṛśyāravindākṣaḥ
[abhimrishyaaravindaakshah]
pāṇinā śaṁ-kareṇa tam
[paaninaa sham-karena tam]
kṛpayā parayā bhaktaṁ
[kripayaa parayaa bhaktam]
megha-gambhīrayā girā
[megha-gambheerayaa giraa]
iti — thus vijñāta - vijñānam — who had understood the truth ṛkṣa — of the bears rājānam — to the king acyutaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa vyājahāra — spoke mahā - rāja — O King (Parīkṣit) bhagavān — the Supreme Lord devakī - suraḥ — the son of Devakī abhimṛśya — touching aravinda - akṣaḥ — lotus-eyed pāṇinā — with His hand śam — auspiciousness kareṇa — which bestows tam — to him kṛpayā — with compassion parayā — great bhaktam — to His devotee megha — like a cloud gambhīrayā — deep girā — in a voice .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
iti vijñāta-viijñānam
iti
thus
vijñāta - vijñānam
who had understood the truth
ṛkṣa-rājānam acyutaḥ
ṛkṣa
of the bears
rājānam
to the king
acyutaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
vyājahāra mahā-rāja
vyājahāra
spoke
mahā - rāja
O King (Parīkṣit)
bhagavān devakī-sutaḥ
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
devakī - suraḥ
the son of Devakī
abhimṛśyāravindākṣaḥ
abhimṛśya
touching
aravinda - akṣaḥ
lotus-eyed
pāṇinā śaṁ-kareṇa tam
pāṇinā
with His hand
śam
auspiciousness
kareṇa
which bestows
tam
to him
kṛpayā parayā bhaktaṁ
kṛpayā
with compassion
parayā
great
bhaktam
to His devotee
megha-gambhīrayā girā
megha
like a cloud
gambhīrayā
deep
girā
in a voice .
  • vijñāta-vijñānam — who had understood the truth
    Compound: vijñāta (understood) + vijñānam (realised knowledge). Vijñāna in Bhāgavata usage is jñāna ripened into anubhava — known in the body, not just the head. Jāmbavān has earned this word with twenty-eight days of fists.
  • śam-kareṇa — by the hand which bestows auspiciousness
    Compound: śam (auspiciousness, peace) + karaḥ (giver, doer). The same compound-shape that names Lord Śiva (Śaṅkara). Kṛṣṇa's hand carries the very meaning of Śiva's name — auspiciousness embodied in touch.
  • megha-gambhīrayā girā — with a voice deep like a cloud
    Compound: megha (cloud) + gambhīrā (deep) + girā (voice, instrumental). The Bhāgavatam's signature image for Bhagavān's voice — deep as a cloud, dark as a cloud, full of rain. Speech and grace fall together.
  • bhaktam — to His devotee
    Accusative of bhakta. The Bhāgavatam's most decisive naming. Once Jāmbavān recognises, Kṛṣṇa names him 'devotee' — and the entire combat is reclassified, retroactively, as bhakti.
  • kṛpayā parayā — with great compassion
    Compound idea: kṛpā (compassion) + parā (supreme, instrumental). The defining word of Gauḍīya soteriology — kṛpā, mercy. The Lord's first response to recognition is not reward but compassion.
[Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued:] O King, Lord Kṛṣṇa then addressed the king of the bears, who had understood the truth. The lotus-eyed Personality of Godhead, the son of Devakī, touched Jāmbavān with His hand, which bestows all blessings, and spoke to His devotee with sublime compassion, His grave voice deeply resounding like a cloud.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[Śukadeva Gosvāmī continued:] O King, Lord Kṛṣṇa then addressed the king of the bears, who had understood the truth. The lotus-eyed Personality of Godhead, the son of Devakī, touched Jāmbavān with His hand, which bestows all blessings, and spoke to His devotee with sublime compassion, His grave voice deeply resounding like a cloud.
Commentary

The Lord touched Jambavan, who had personally realized (vijnata) knowledge of bhagavan (visistha jnana or vijnana), with his hand, and thus relieved his devotee of his bodily pains.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Ṛkṣa-rājānam instead of ṛkṣa-rājam is poetic license. Though involved in fighting in this way, Kṛṣṇa remained fixed in his affection (acyutaḥ) because he was the son of Devakī, Bhagavān. O king! People like you have also realized this. With the greatest mercy he touched Jāmbavān on all his limbs since he was a devotee, with his hand which bestowed all happiness (saṁkareṇa) while removing the suffering caused by the fight, while looking at him with a joyful, affectionate glance (aravindākṣaḥ). Śukadeva describes his voice as resembling rumbling clouds out of longing on remembering the sweetness of the tone of his voice. Jāmbavān understood what had to be understood—that he had previously been the Lord’s servant, and that he himself had special powers. Or he had understood various things about himself.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
The lotus-eyed Lord touches Jāmbavān with His blessing hand and speaks gravely. Touch from the Lord is itself blessing; even after combat, the same hand that fought now blesses.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could the hand that fought you actually be the hand that blesses?
  • How do you receive blessing through what looked like combat?

The same hand that struck Jāmbavān for twenty-eight days now touches him with auspiciousness. The Lord's contact has two modes — combat and benediction — and they are the same hand. The Bhāgavatam closes the loop: misrecognition healed by touch.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.31

↗
मणिहेतोरिह प्राप्ता वयमृक्षपते बिलम् । मिथ्याभिशापं प्रमृजन्नात्मनो मणिनामुना ॥ ३१ ॥
maṇi-hetor iha prāptā
[mani-hetor iha praaptaa]
vayam ṛkṣa-pate bilam
[vayam riksha-pate bilam]
mithyābhiśāpaṁ pramṛjann
[mithyaabhishaapam pramrijann]
ātmano maṇināmunā
[aatmano maninaamunaa]
maṇi — the jewel hetoḥ — because of iha — here prāptāḥ — have come vayam — we ṛkṣa - pate — O lord of the bears bilam — to the cave mithyā — false abhiśāpam — the accusation pramṛjan — to dispel ātmanaḥ — against Myself maṇinā — with the jewel amunā — this .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
maṇi-hetor iha prāptā
maṇi
the jewel
hetoḥ
because of
iha
here
prāptāḥ
have come
vayam ṛkṣa-pate bilam
vayam
we
ṛkṣa - pate
O lord of the bears
bilam
to the cave
mithyābhiśāpaṁ pramṛjann
mithyā
false
abhiśāpam
the accusation
pramṛjan
to dispel
ātmano maṇināmunā
ātmanaḥ
against Myself
maṇinā
with the jewel
amunā
this .
  • maṇi-hetoḥ — for the sake of the jewel
    Compound: maṇi (jewel) + hetoḥ (cause, ablative). The Lord names His pretext — and Gauḍīya commentators love this: Bhagavān's stated cause is always partial; the real cause is always the devotee. The gem is hetu; Jāmbavatī is phala.
  • mithyā abhiśāpam — false accusation
    Compound: mithyā (false) + abhiśāpa (curse, accusation). The Bhāgavatam names slander as an abhiśāpa — a curse-class speech act. Spoken false words about Bhagavān have weight, and must be cleared by deed, not by counter-word.
  • pramṛjan — to dispel, wipe clean
    Present participle of pra + √mṛj. Same root family as mārṣṭum (v.17) and mṛjāmi (v.40). The chapter's verb of cleaning recurs at each pivot — Bhagavān cleans His name, Jāmbavān cleans his confusion, Satrājit cleans his greed.
[Lord Kṛṣṇa said:] It is for this jewel, O lord of the bears, that we have come to your cave. I intend to use the jewel to disprove the false accusations against Me.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[Lord Kṛṣṇa said:] It is for this jewel, O lord of the bears, that we have come to your cave. I intend to use the jewel to disprove the false accusations against Me.
Commentary

Many of us came to this cave for the jewel, and I have entered it (not stated but understood), in order to dispel the false rumors about me by that jewel.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I came to the door of your caver for the jewel. With the jewel I will completely remove suspicion. Bu seeing Prasena killed by the lion doubt is removed, but to completely remove doubt, the jewel should be brought back (pra—mṛjan). The Lord had considered saying this but for fear of repetition he only hinted at it.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
It is for this jewel that we have come to your cave; I intend to use it to disprove false accusations against Me. The Lord names His specific mission; even apparently small objects serve large reputational purposes.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'jewel' have you been pursuing that is actually about clearing someone's name?
  • Where does the small object carry the large message?

Bhagavān tells His devotee plainly: I came for this jewel — not for the gem itself, but to disprove the slander against Me. The Lord cares about His yaśas in His devotees' world, because the slander wounds the bhaktas, not Him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.32

↗
इत्युक्त: स्वां दुहितरं कन्यां जाम्बवतीं मुदा । अर्हणार्थं स मणिना कृष्णायोपजहार ह ॥ ३२ ॥
ity uktaḥ svāṁ duhitaraṁ
[ity uktah svaam duhitaram]
kanyāṁ jāmbavatīṁ mudā
[kanyaam jaambavateem mudaa]
arhaṇārtham sa maṇinā
[arhanaartham sa maninaa]
kṛṣṇāyopajahāra ha
[krishnaayopajahaara ha]
iti — thus uktaḥ — addressed svām — his duhitaram — daughter kanyām — maiden jāmbavatīm — named Jāmbavatī mudā — happily arhaṇa - artham — as a respectful offering saḥ — he maṇinā — with the jewel kṛṣṇāya — to Lord Kṛṣṇa upajahāra ha — presented .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ity uktaḥ svāṁ duhitaraṁ
iti
thus
uktaḥ
addressed
svām
his
duhitaram
daughter
kanyāṁ jāmbavatīṁ mudā
kanyām
maiden
jāmbavatīm
named Jāmbavatī
mudā
happily
arhaṇārtham sa maṇinā
arhaṇa - artham
as a respectful offering
saḥ
he
maṇinā
with the jewel
kṛṣṇāyopajahāra ha
kṛṣṇāya
to Lord Kṛṣṇa
upajahāra ha
presented .
  • jāmbavatīm — named Jāmbavatī
    Accusative of Jāmbavatī, daughter of Jāmbavān. She will become one of Kṛṣṇa's eight principal queens. Her name carries her father's — a daughter who is, ontologically, the gift of the bear-king's resolved bhakti.
  • arhaṇa-artham — as a respectful offering
    Compound: arhaṇa (worship, honor) + artham (purpose). Daughter as upahāra. The Bhāgavatam frames matrimony as worship — kanyā as the highest dakṣiṇā a father can offer the Lord.
  • mudā — happily
    Instrumental of mud (joy). After twenty-eight days of fighting, the verse simply says 'happily'. The Bhāgavata's economy: reconciliation with Bhagavān is recorded with a single ablative of joy.
  • upajahāra ha — presented
    From upa + √hṛ (to offer); ha is the emphatic particle. The same verb-family as the offerings made in yajña. Giving the daughter is structured grammatically as a yajña-offering. Bhakti is yajña, even in family matters.
Thus addressed, Jāmbavān happily honored Lord Kṛṣṇa by offering Him his maiden daughter, Jāmbavatī, together with the jewel.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus addressed, Jāmbavān happily honored Lord Kṛṣṇa by offering Him his maiden daughter, Jāmbavatī, together with the jewel.
Commentary

He gave his daughter to Krsna along with the jewel.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

His daughter had a human form even though he had an animal form. Yet he considered her his (svām) daughter. This was possible because as a son of a devatā, he could take various forms. She was unmarried (kanyām). Because of great affection for her he named her after himself as Jāmbavatī. The story is told in Māthura-hari-vaṁśa. During the appearance of Rāmacandra, this daughter had been born. Jāmbavān wanted to give her to Rāma alone. Rāma said that since in that avatāra he has only one wife as a vow, it was not possible. It would happen during the appearance of Kṛṣṇa. He ordered him to do austerities for this purpose for many days. Remembering that, after a long time he attained his desire after doing his austerities at Govardhana.

Related values
Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Nishkama Karma (Selfless Action)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Dana (Charity / Generosity)
Related verses
Concepts
JivaAvatara
Jāmbavān happily honors the Lord by offering Him his maiden daughter Jāmbavatī together with the jewel. Defeat by the Lord ends in offering one's daughter; surrender produces marriage.
Reflection Questions
  • What does Jāmbavān-style surrender — offering family alliance — look like in your life?
  • Where do you withhold what defeat by the Lord would invite you to give?

Jāmbavān gives his daughter to the Lord — the only fitting upahāra a great devotee can offer his Lord, beyond gems. Bhakti's full ledger turns at this verse: hostility resolved into kanyā-dāna. The Bhāgavatam writes its sweetest reconciliations in matrimony.

Daśaratha giving Sītā in another life

Across the two avatāras the pattern repeats — Janaka gives Sītā to Rāma, Jāmbavān gives Jāmbavatī to Kṛṣṇa. Each father's gift seals the daughter's identification as Bhagavān's eternal śakti.

Gauḍīya commentators note that Jāmbavān's gift here is the formal closing of his Rāma-era devotion — what he could not consummate in Tretā-yuga (he was no father then) he completes in Dvāpara. The Bhāgavatam finishes Rāmāyaṇa's loose threads in passing.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.33

↗
अद‍ृष्ट्वा निर्गमं शौरे: प्रविष्टस्य बिलं जना: । प्रतीक्ष्य द्वादशाहानि दु:खिता: स्वपुरं ययु: ॥ ३३ ॥
adṛṣṭvā nirgamaṁ śaureḥ
[adrishtvaa nirgamam shaureh]
praviṣṭasya bilaṁ janāḥ
[pravishtasya bilam janaah]
pratīkṣya dvādaśāhāni
[prateekshya dvaadashaahaani]
duḥkhitāḥ sva-puraṁ yayuḥ
[duhkhitaah sva-puram yayuh]
adṛṣṭvā — not seeing nirgamam — the exit śaureḥ — of Lord Kṛṣṇa praviṣṭasya — who had gone inside bilam — the cave janaḥ — the people pratīkṣya — after waiting dvādaśa — twelve ahāni — days duḥkhitāḥ — unhappy sva — their puram — to the city yayuḥ — went .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
adṛṣṭvā nirgamaṁ śaureḥ
adṛṣṭvā
not seeing
nirgamam
the exit
śaureḥ
of Lord Kṛṣṇa
praviṣṭasya bilaṁ janāḥ
praviṣṭasya
who had gone inside
bilam
the cave
janaḥ
the people
pratīkṣya dvādaśāhāni
pratīkṣya
after waiting
dvādaśa
twelve
ahāni
days
duḥkhitāḥ sva-puraṁ yayuḥ
duḥkhitāḥ
unhappy
sva
their
puram
to the city
yayuḥ
went .
  • dvādaśa ahāni — twelve days
    Compound: dvādaśa (twelve) + ahas (day, accusative plural). The citizens' wait. Inside the cave Jāmbavān has fought for twenty-eight; outside the wait was twelve. Time in līlā is non-uniform — a devotee's interior week may be a city's day.
  • duḥkhitāḥ — unhappy
    Past participle of √duḥkh. Even the citizens of Dvārakā grieve when they cannot see Kṛṣṇa. The Bhāgavata makes duḥkha in Kṛṣṇa's absence the structural opposite of sukha in His presence — same root as the gopīs' viraha.
  • yayuḥ — they went
    Perfect of √yā. The verb of return — the citizens go home. Even faith has fatigue. The Bhāgavatam treats this honestly; it is not a failure, only a phase that the Lord's return will dissolve.
After Lord Śauri had entered the cave, the people of Dvārakā who had accompanied Him had waited twelve days without seeing Him come out again. Finally they had given up and returned to their city in great sorrow.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After Lord Śauri had entered the cave, the people of Dvārakā who had accompanied Him had waited twelve days without seeing Him come out again. Finally they had given up and returned to their city in great sorrow.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Thinking of Vasudeva and others, the people thought it was not proper to stay longer. Those close to Satrājit returned to the city. Though the inhabitants of Dvārakā were grieved, because they were not intimately associated with Kṛṣṇa they returned to his city rather than stay at the cave he had entered.

Concepts
Jiva
After twelve days the citizens of Dvārakā give up and return in great sorrow. Those who wait outside have their own timeline for despair; absence interpreted as loss is the natural human response.
Reflection Questions
  • Where have you interpreted the Lord's absence as loss after twelve days of waiting?
  • How could you wait longer when scripture grants Him longer in caves?

The citizens wait twelve days outside the cave and finally return, grieving. The Bhāgavatam quietly notes that even devotees lose hope — and the Lord lets them, sometimes, that He may return with a bride and a jewel and turn grief into festival.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.34

↗
निशम्य देवकी देवी रक्‍मिण्यानकदुन्दुभि: । सुहृदो ज्ञातयोऽशोचन् बिलात् कृष्णमनिर्गतम् ॥ ३४ ॥
niśamya devakī devī
[nishamya devakee devee]
rakmiṇy ānakadundubhiḥ
[rakminy aanakadundubhih]
suhṛdo jñātayo ’śocan
[suhrido jnaatayo ’shochan]
bilāt kṛṣṇam anirgatam
[bilaat krishnam anirgatam]
niśamya — hearing devakī — Devakī devī rukmiṇī — the divine Rukmiṇī ānakadundubhiḥ — Vasudeva suhṛdaḥ — friends jñātayaḥ — relatives aśocan — they lamented bilāt — from the cave kṛṣṇam — Kṛṣṇa anirgatam — not come out .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
niśamya devakī devī
niśamya
hearing
devakī
Devakī
devī rukmiṇī
the divine Rukmiṇī
rakmiṇy ānakadundubhiḥ
ānakadundubhiḥ
Vasudeva
suhṛdo jñātayo ’śocan
suhṛdaḥ
friends
jñātayaḥ
relatives
aśocan
they lamented
bilāt kṛṣṇam anirgatam
bilāt
from the cave
kṛṣṇam
Kṛṣṇa
anirgatam
not come out .
  • devakī — Devakī
    The mother. Once she lost six sons to Kaṁsa; now she fears she has lost her seventh. The Bhāgavatam never lets her vātsalya rest — every absence reopens that wound.
  • rukmiṇī — Rukmiṇī
    The chief queen, Lakṣmī Herself. Her name appears before the new wife Satyabhāmā even arrives — the Bhāgavatam establishes that no new wife displaces Rukmiṇī's primacy. Gauḍīya commentators read her here as patient sovereignty.
  • aśocan — they lamented
    Imperfect of √śuc. The same verb the Gītā opens with — Arjuna's śoka. The chapter uses identical vocabulary to mark that even the Lord's intimates pass through Gītā-class grief in His absence.
When Devakī, Rukmiṇī-devī, Vasudeva and the Lord’s other relatives and friends heard that He had not come out of the cave, they all lamented.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Devakī, Rukmiṇī-devī, Vasudeva and the Lord's other relatives and friends heard that He had not come out of the cave, they all lamented.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Devī can modify Devakī and Rukmiṇī and indicates they were worthy of worship. They are mentioned first because of their great prema and representing the highest śakti. Vasudeva and others are mentioned afterwards because of lesser prema. Suhrḍaḥ can mean relatives or friends.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Devakī, Rukmiṇī, Vasudeva and other relatives lament hearing He hasn't come out. Family lament is shared community grief; the Lord's apparent disappearance affects His circle.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose absence in your community shapes everyone's grief at once?
  • How do you grieve in community without amplifying despair?

Devakī mourns; Rukmiṇī mourns; Vasudeva mourns. The Lord's absence is felt first in the mothers and the wives — those whose love is hourly. Cosmic disappearance is registered most precisely in the kitchens of the women who feed Him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.35

↗
सत्राजितं शपन्तस्ते दु:खिता द्वारकौकस: । उपतस्थुश्चन्द्रभागां दुर्गां कृष्णोपलब्धये ॥ ३५ ॥
satrājitaṁ śapantas te
[satraajitam shapantas te]
duḥkhitā dvārakaukasaḥ
[duhkhitaa dvaarakaukasah]
upatasthuś candrabhāgāṁ
[upatasthush chandrabhaagaam]
durgāṁ kṛṣṇopalabdhaye
[durgaam krishnopalabdhaye]
satrājitam — Satrājit śapantaḥ — cursing te — they duḥkhitāḥ — sorrowful dvārakā - okasaḥ — the residents of Dvārakā upatasthuḥ — worshiped candrabhāgām — Candrabhāgā durgām — Durgā kṛṣṇa - upalabdhaye — in order to obtain Kṛṣṇa .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satrājitaṁ śapantas te
satrājitam
Satrājit
śapantaḥ
cursing
te
they
duḥkhitā dvārakaukasaḥ
duḥkhitāḥ
sorrowful
dvārakā - okasaḥ
the residents of Dvārakā
upatasthuś candrabhāgāṁ
upatasthuḥ
worshiped
candrabhāgām
Candrabhāgā
durgāṁ kṛṣṇopalabdhaye
durgām
Durgā
kṛṣṇa - upalabdhaye
in order to obtain Kṛṣṇa .
  • śapantaḥ — cursing
    Present participle of √śap. The citizens curse Satrājit — the slanderer of the previous arc is now the cursed. Vaiṣṇava sociology: the body politic of devotees protects Bhagavān's yaśas even before He returns to defend it.
  • durgām — Durgā
    Accusative of Durgā — the Lord's external energy in protective form. Gauḍīya theology positions Durgā as Bhagavān's servant — citizens worship her to obtain Kṛṣṇa, not Kṛṣṇa to obtain her. The grammar holds the hierarchy.
  • kṛṣṇa-upalabdhaye — in order to obtain Kṛṣṇa
    Compound: kṛṣṇa + upalabdhi (obtaining, dative). The whole motive of Durgā-worship, in the Vaiṣṇava reading, is kṛṣṇa-upalabdhi. Any other use of Durgā is a category error.
Cursing Satrājit, the sorrowful residents of Dvārakā approached the Durgā deity named Candrabhāgā and prayed to her for Kṛṣṇa’s return.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Cursing Satrājit, the sorrowful residents of Dvārakā approached the Durgā deity named Candrabhāgā and prayed to her for Kṛṣṇa's return.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They approached Durgā because they were absorbed in their roles as ordinary people just as the Lord himself acted as an ordinary person. They approached her for the quick attainment (upalabdhaye) of Kṛṣṇa.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Devakī and others (te) or all them taking Kṛṣṇa as their very life (te), all people, approached Durgā for attaining Kṛṣṇa quickly, the form of bliss. Being a special śakti of the Lord, she could do this.

Concepts
Jiva
Cursing Satrājit, the sorrowful residents approach the Durgā deity Candrabhāgā and pray for Kṛṣṇa's return. Cursing the cause and praying to the protector go together; complaint and petition coexist.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could honest cursing of the cause coexist with sincere prayer for return?
  • How do you direct grievance and petition at the right addresses?

When Bhagavān seems lost, the devotee turns to His śakti — the citizens go to Candrabhāgā Durgā, who exists to point back to Hari. The Bhāgavata frame: even the demigoddess's purpose is to return Kṛṣṇa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.36

↗
तेषां तु देव्युपस्थानात् प्रत्यादिष्टाशिषा स च । प्रादुर्बभूव सिद्धार्थ: सदारो हर्षयन् हरि: ॥ ३६ ॥
teṣāṁ tu devy-upasthānāt
[teshaam tu devy-upasthaanaat]
pratyādiṣṭāśiṣā sa ca
[pratyaadishtaashishaa sa cha]
prādurbabhūva siddhārthaḥ
[praadurbabhoova siddhaarthah]
sa-dāro harṣayan hariḥ
[sa-daaro harshayan harih]
teṣām — to them tu — but devī — of the demigoddess upasthānāt — after the worship pratyādiṣṭa — granted in response āśiṣāḥ — benediction saḥ — He ca — and prādurbabhūva — appeared siddha — having achieved arthaḥ — His purpose sa - dāraḥ — together with His wife harṣayan — creating joy hariḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
teṣāṁ tu devy-upasthānāt
teṣām
to them
tu
but
devī
of the demigoddess
upasthānāt
after the worship
pratyādiṣṭāśiṣā sa ca
pratyādiṣṭa
granted in response
āśiṣāḥ
benediction
saḥ
He
ca
and
prādurbabhūva siddhārthaḥ
prādurbabhūva
appeared
siddha
having achieved
arthaḥ
His purpose
sa-dāro harṣayan hariḥ
sa - dāraḥ
together with His wife
harṣayan
creating joy
hariḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa .
  • siddha-arthaḥ — having achieved His purpose
    Compound: siddha (accomplished) + artha (purpose). The Lord's stated artha was clearing the slander; His unstated artha was Jāmbavatī. Bhāgavata convention: Bhagavān's siddha-artha always exceeds His announced one.
  • sa-dāraḥ — together with His wife
    Compound: sa (with) + dāra (wife). The new wife (Jāmbavatī) arrives unannounced — the citizens' grief tips into wonder. Bhāgavata storytelling delights in such reveals.
  • harṣayan — creating joy
    Present participle (causative) of √hṛṣ. The verb is causative — He makes them rejoice. Bhagavān's return is not passive; He actively produces sukha in His devotees' faces, the way a sun actively shines.
  • hariḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa
    Hari — He who steals (grief, sins, hearts). The chapter's bookend with v.2's hareḥ. Parīkṣit asked his question to Hari; the chapter answers him by showing Hari at work.
When the citizens had finished worshiping the demigoddess, she spoke to them in response, promising to grant their request. Just then Lord Kṛṣṇa, who had achieved His purpose, appeared before them in the company of His new wife, filling them with joy.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When the citizens had finished worshiping the demigoddess, she spoke to them in response, promising to grant their request. Just then Lord Kṛṣṇa, who had achieved His purpose, appeared before them in the company of His new wife, filling them with joy.
Commentary

With the granting of blessings "Krsna will appear soon," Krsna appeared along with his wife. Instead of "asisa sa ca"(blessing) sometimes the word asisa asava is seen in the verse. then the verse means "with the granting of blessings, Krsna who was dear as life to everyone, appeared."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The word tu indicates an exceptional circumstance. By worshipping devatās the Lord does not appear to ordinary people. It is said devān deva-yajo yānti: worshippers of devatās attain the devatās. However when the people of Dvārakā worshipped Durgā, Kṛṣṇa appeared. In worshipping her, the people had only prema for Kṛṣṇa, who himself acted in pastimes with an appearance of ordinary dealings. Durgā attained qualification by the relationship with them. Whatever blessing she gave came true. Kṛṣṇa’s goal was to retrieve the jewel, give mercy to Jāmbavān, win Jāmbavatī as a bride, and refute Satrājit’s claim. He had attained these goals (siddharthaḥ). He appeared with his wife suddenly. Thus it is possible that he came on Garuḍa.

Related values
Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Maitri (Friendship / Goodwill)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Raksha (Protective Responsibility)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Prema (Divine Love)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
After worship, the goddess promises to grant the request; just then Kṛṣṇa appears with His new wife, filling everyone with joy. Goddess promise meets divine appearance simultaneously; demigod prayer is answered by the Supreme arriving.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does prayer to a demigod become the doorway to the Supreme's arrival?
  • How do you receive answers that come through unexpected doors?

The goddess speaks; the Lord appears — but the order is reversed from cause to effect. The Bhāgavatam shows Bhagavān timing His return to coincide with the devotee's last cry, not the goddess's word. He always was returning; the prayer only opened the citizens' eyes.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.37

↗
उपलभ्य हृषीकेशं मृतं पुनरिवागतम् । सह पत्न्‍या मणिग्रीवं सर्वे जातमहोत्सवा: ॥ ३७ ॥
upalabhya hṛṣīkeśaṁ
[upalabhya hrisheekesham]
mṛtaṁ punar ivāgatam
[mritam punar ivaagatam]
saha patnyā maṇi-grīvaṁ
[saha patnyaa mani-greevam]
sarve jāta-mahotsavāḥ
[sarve jaata-mahotsavaah]
upalabhya — recognizing hṛṣīkeśam — the Lord of the senses mṛtam — someone dead punaḥ — again iva — as if āgatam — come saha — with patnyā — a wife maṇi — the jewel grīvam — on His neck sarve — all of them jāta — aroused mahā — great utsavāḥ — rejoicing .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
upalabhya hṛṣīkeśaṁ
upalabhya
recognizing
hṛṣīkeśam
the Lord of the senses
mṛtaṁ punar ivāgatam
mṛtam
someone dead
punaḥ
again
iva
as if
āgatam
come
saha patnyā maṇi-grīvaṁ
saha
with
patnyā
a wife
maṇi
the jewel
grīvam
on His neck
sarve jāta-mahotsavāḥ
sarve
all of them
jāta
aroused
mahā
great
utsavāḥ
rejoicing .
  • hṛṣīkeśam — the Lord of the senses
    Compound: hṛṣīka (senses) + īśa (lord). The Gītā's chosen name for Kṛṣṇa as Arjuna's sārathi — the one in charge of the senses. The citizens' senses (which they thought were the issue) are revealed to belong to Him.
  • iva āgatam — as if come (back)
    Compound idea: iva (as if) + āgata (come). The Bhāgavatam's structural irony — the Lord cannot die, but to His devotees His absence is death-equivalent, so His return is felt as resurrection. Bhakti measures presence and absence on the death-scale.
  • maṇi-grīvam — the jewel on (His) neck
    Compound: maṇi (jewel) + grīva (neck). The same gem that was supposedly the cause of the killing now hangs visibly on the supposed killer's neck — public, unhidden. The slander dies in one image.
Seeing Lord Hṛṣīkeśa return as if from death, accompanied by His new wife and wearing the Syamantaka jewel on His neck, all the people were roused to jubilation.

According to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, Jāmbavān had placed the jewel on the Lord’s neck when he had presented his daughter in marriage.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Seeing Lord Hṛṣīkeśa return as if from death, accompanied by His new wife and wearing the Syamantaka jewel on His neck, all the people were roused to jubilation.
Commentary

At the time of giving his daughter to Krsna, Jambavan also put the jewel around the neck of Krsna (mani grivam).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Without Kṛṣṇa the inhabitants had become almost unconscious, without senses. Kṛṣṇa was the master of their senses (hṛṣīkeśam). The jewel around his neck is mentioned last because simply by wearing in on his neck he reversed the situation completely, causing joy to the devotees and sorrow to his detractors.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa was the master of their senses (hṛṣīkeśam). He inspired their jubilation. He wore the jewel around his neck to dispel the gossip. The festival became greater because it pleased Kṛṣṇa.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Seeing Hṛṣīkeśa return as if from death with His new wife and the Syamantaka on His neck, all are roused to jubilation. Apparent resurrection — He returns with bonus — exceeds even relief.
Reflection Questions
  • When has the Lord returned in your life with 'bonus' you didn't dare ask for?
  • How do you frame compounded grace in gratitude?

He has come back from the dead — that is how it looked to His city — bearing the jewel they had accused Him of taking, with a wife they did not know He was acquiring. Every line of the slander is rewritten in His favour by one homecoming.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.38

↗
सत्राजितं समाहूय सभायां राजसन्निधौ । प्राप्तिं चाख्याय भगवान् मणिं तस्मै न्यवेदयत् ॥ ३८ ॥
satrājitaṁ samāhūya
[satraajitam samaahooya]
sabhāyāṁ rāja-sannidhau
[sabhaayaam raaja-sannidhau]
prāptiṁ cākhyāya bhagavān
[praaptim chaakhyaaya bhagavaan]
maṇiṁ tasmai nyavedayat
[manim tasmai nyavedayat]
satrājitam — Satrājit samāhūya — calling sabhāyām — into the royal assembly rāja — of the King (Ugrasena) sannidhau — in the presence prāptim — the recovery ca — and ākhyāya — announcing bhagavān — the Supreme Lord maṇim — the jewel tasmai — to him nyavedayat — presented .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
satrājitaṁ samāhūya
satrājitam
Satrājit
samāhūya
calling
sabhāyāṁ rāja-sannidhau
sabhāyām
into the royal assembly
rāja
of the King (Ugrasena)
sannidhau
in the presence
prāptiṁ cākhyāya bhagavān
prāptim
the recovery
ca
and
ākhyāya
announcing
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
maṇiṁ tasmai nyavedayat
maṇim
the jewel
tasmai
to him
nyavedayat
presented .
  • sabhāyām — in the royal assembly
    Locative of sabhā. The proper locus for clearing a public accusation. The Bhāgavatam respects civic process — Bhagavān could clear His name privately but submits to the sabhā's witness. Dharmic restoration is public.
  • rāja-sannidhau — in the presence of the King
    Compound: rāja (king, Ugrasena) + sannidhi (presence). Kṛṣṇa makes Ugrasena the judging witness — even though the Lord is Ugrasena's protector, He defers to the office. Gauḍīya emphasis: He honours every legitimate dharmic authority even when He outranks it.
  • nyavedayat — presented
    Causative of ni + √vid. The same verb used for offering the deity a gift in temple service. Kṛṣṇa presents the jewel to Satrājit with the formal grammar of nivedana — He is performing a kind of arcana on the offender.
Lord Kṛṣṇa summoned Satrājit to the royal assembly. There, in the presence of King Ugrasena, Kṛṣṇa announced the recovery of the jewel and then formally presented it to Satrājit.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Lord Kṛṣṇa summoned Satrājit to the royal assembly. There, in the presence of King Ugrasena, Kṛṣṇa announced the recovery of the jewel and then formally presented it to Satrājit.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With attention he summoned Satrājit, and in the presence of the king, Ugrasena, or all the kings, in order to dispel the false rumors and give joy to all people, he explained the events to all the citizens and even though he had previously requested it for Ugrasena, offered the jewel to Satrājit to show that he had not desire for it since as the Lord full of all powers and wealth (bhagavān), he had no interest in such things.

Related values
Bhakti (Devotion)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Kṛṣṇa summons Satrājit to the royal assembly; in Ugrasena's presence He announces recovery of the jewel and formally presents it to Satrājit. Public restoration of misused property completes the cycle; the Lord doesn't keep the spoils of His investigation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you keep what was misused as if it were now yours?
  • How does public restoration complete healing in a community?

The Lord returns the jewel publicly, in the king's court, with Ugrasena watching. Bhakti has its forensic component — slander must be cleared not in private but in sabhā, so that the citizens' faith is restored along with the gem.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.39

↗
स चातिव्रीडितो रत्नं गृहीत्वावाङ्‍मुखस्तत: । अनुतप्यमानो भवनमगमत् स्वेन पाप्मना ॥ ३९ ॥
sa cāti-vrīḍito ratnaṁ
[sa chaati-vreedito ratnam]
gṛhītvāvāṅ-mukhas tataḥ
[griheetvaavaan-mukhas tatah]
anutapyamāno bhavanam
[anutapyamaano bhavanam]
agamat svena pāpmanā
[agamat svena paapmanaa]
saḥ — he, Satrājit ca — and ati — extremely vrīḍitaḥ — ashamed ratnam — the gem gṛhītvā — taking avāk — downward mukhaḥ — his face tataḥ — from there anutapyamānaḥ — feeling remorse bhavanam — to his home agamat — went svena — with his own pāpmanā — sinful behavior .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa cāti-vrīḍito ratnaṁ
saḥ
he, Satrājit
ca
and
ati
extremely
vrīḍitaḥ
ashamed
ratnam
the gem
gṛhītvāvāṅ-mukhas tataḥ
gṛhītvā
taking
avāk
downward
mukhaḥ
his face
tataḥ
from there
anutapyamāno bhavanam
anutapyamānaḥ
feeling remorse
bhavanam
to his home
agamat svena pāpmanā
agamat
went
svena
with his own
pāpmanā
sinful behavior .
  • vrīḍitaḥ — ashamed
    Past participle of √vrīḍ. Vrīḍā (shame) is a Gauḍīya rasa-element — the gopīs feel vrīḍā before Kṛṣṇa, devotees feel vrīḍā at their own offenses. Both ennoble the bhāva. Satrājit's vrīḍā here is the seed of his eventual surrender.
  • avāk-mukhaḥ — face downward
    Compound: avāk (downward) + mukha (face). The body language of remorse. Even Sanskrit grammar codes the moral state — face down, gem in hand, walking home alone.
  • anutapyamānaḥ — feeling remorse
    Present participle of anu + √tap (passive). The same √tap as tapas — but here it burns inwardly as remorse. Bhāgavata teaching: anutāpa is the right tapas of the offender; remorse is the heat that prepares the soil.
  • pāpmanā — with his sinful behavior
    Instrumental of pāpman. He walks home accompanied by his pāpa — until offered as gift to Hari. The Bhāgavatam's psychology: pāpa is a thing one carries until one hands it over.
Hanging his head in great shame, Satrājit took the gem and returned home, all the while feeling remorse for his sinful behavior.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hanging his head in great shame, Satrājit took the gem and returned home, all the while feeling remorse for his sinful behavior.
Commentary

Satrajit was repentent (anupayamana) for his offensive behavior.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The word ca means “but.” This distinguishes him from the other people who were excellent. He, unlike the others, felt remorse. He then left the assembly (tataḥ) and went to his house. The Lord, because of his affection, did not disrespect Satrājit, but accepted the sin as his own (svena).

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Hanging his head in shame, Satrājit takes the gem and returns home, feeling remorse for his sinful behavior. Returned property doesn't undo the offense; remorse persists alongside material restoration.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does material restoration coexist with the slower work of remorse?
  • How do you tend remorse without it becoming despair?

Satrājit's hung head is the chapter's quietest scene. The man who installed a jewel where the deity should sit now walks home with his head down — the deity has corrected the architecture without a word.

Bhīṣma's remorse on the arrow-bed

Bhīṣma had once vowed to never let Kṛṣṇa lift a weapon; in the Kurukṣetra war he forced Kṛṣṇa to lift the chariot-wheel. On his arrow-bed he wept — not for his wounds, but for what he had pulled from his Lord.

Satrājit, walking home with the jewel and his shame, is in the same posture: the lesser man who has finally registered the cost of his demand on Bhagavān. The Bhāgavatam never lets shame remain a closed feeling; it pushes it toward atonement.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.40-42

↗
सोऽनुध्यायंस्तदेवाघं बलवद्विग्रहाकुल: । कथं मृजाम्यात्मरज: प्रसीदेद् वाच्युत: कथम् ॥ ४० ॥ किं कृत्वा साधु मह्यं स्यान्न शपेद् वा जनो यथा । अदीर्घदर्शनं क्षुद्रं मूढं द्रविणलोलुपम् ॥ ४१ ॥ दास्ये दुहितरं तस्मै स्‍त्रीरत्नं रत्नमेव च । उपायोऽयं समीचीनस्तस्य शान्तिर्न चान्यथा ॥ ४२ ॥
so ’nudhyāyaṁs tad evāghaṁ
[so ’nudhyaayams tad evaagham]
balavad-vigrahākulaḥ
[balavad-vigrahaakulah]
kathaṁ mṛjāmy ātma-rajaḥ
[katham mrijaamy aatma-rajah]
prasīded vācyutaḥ katham
[praseeded vaachyutah katham]
kim kṛtvā sādhu mahyaṁ syān
[kim kritvaa saadhu mahyam syaan]
na śaped vā jano yathā
[na shaped vaa jano yathaa]
adīrgha-darśanaṁ kṣudraṁ
[adeergha-darshanam kshudram]
mūḍhaṁ draviṇa-lolupam
[moodham dravina-lolupam]
dāsye duhitaraṁ tasmai
[daasye duhitaram tasmai]
strī-ratnaṁ ratnam eva ca
[stree-ratnam ratnam eva cha]
upāyo ’yaṁ samīcīnas
[upaayo ’yam sameecheenas]
tasya śāntir na cānyathā
[tasya shaantir na chaanyathaa]
saḥ — he anudhyāyan — pondering over tat — that eva — indeed agham — offense bala - vat — with those who are powerful vigraha — about a conflict ākulaḥ — worried katham — how mṛjāmi — will I cleanse ātma — of myself rajaḥ — the contamination prasīdet — may become satisfied vā — or acyutaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa katham — how kim — what kṛtvā — doing sādhu — good mahyam — for me syāt — there may be na śapet — may not curse vā — or janaḥ — the people yathā — so as adīrgha — short-ranged darśanam — whose vision kṣudram — petty mūḍham — befooled draviṇa — after wealth lolupam — avaricious dāsye — I will give duhitaram — my daughter tasmai — to Him strī — of women ratnam — the jewel ratnam — the jewel eva ca — as well upāyaḥ — means ayam — this samīcīnaḥ — effective tasya — His śāntiḥ — pacification na — not ca — and anyathā — otherwise .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’nudhyāyaṁs tad evāghaṁ
balavad-vigrahākulaḥ
kathaṁ mṛjāmy ātma-rajaḥ
prasīded vācyutaḥ katham
kim kṛtvā sādhu mahyaṁ syān
saḥ
he
anudhyāyan
pondering over
na śaped vā jano yathā
adīrgha-darśanaṁ kṣudraṁ
mūḍhaṁ draviṇa-lolupam
dāsye duhitaraṁ tasmai
tat
that
strī-ratnaṁ ratnam eva ca
eva
indeed
agham
offense
bala - vat
with those who are powerful
vigraha
about a conflict
ākulaḥ
worried
katham
how
mṛjāmi
will I cleanse
upāyo ’yaṁ samīcīnas
tasya śāntir na cānyathā
ātma
of myself
rajaḥ
the contamination
prasīdet
may become satisfied
vā
or
acyutaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
katham
how
kim
what
kṛtvā
doing
sādhu
good
mahyam
for me
syāt
there may be
na śapet
may not curse
vā
or
janaḥ
the people
yathā
so as
adīrgha
short-ranged
darśanam
whose vision
kṣudram
petty
mūḍham
befooled
draviṇa
after wealth
lolupam
avaricious
dāsye
I will give
duhitaram
my daughter
tasmai
to Him
strī
of women
ratnam
the jewel
ratnam
the jewel
eva ca
as well
upāyaḥ
means
ayam
this
samīcīnaḥ
effective
tasya
His
śāntiḥ
pacification
na
not
ca
and
anyathā
otherwise .
  • agham — offense
    Same word used for the demon Aghāsura earlier in the canto. The offense and the demon share the name — to commit agha is to host the demon, to repent of agha is to do what Kṛṣṇa did to Aghāsura: enter and dismantle it from within.
  • mṛjāmi ātma-rajaḥ — I will cleanse my own contamination
    Compound idea: mṛj (cleanse) + ātma (self) + rajaḥ (dust, contamination). The chapter's recurring verb of cleaning returns one final time — on the lips of the offender. Bhāgavata structure: the verb passes from Bhagavān to devotee.
  • acyutaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa, the infallible
    From a (not) + √cyu (fall). 'He who never falls' — and never lets His devotee fall. Satrājit names Bhagavān with this name precisely when wondering whether he can be forgiven: a precise theological choice, because acyutas refuse to let surrendered souls slip.
  • strī-ratnam — jewel of women
    Compound: strī (woman) + ratna (jewel). The chapter doubles the word ratna deliberately — both the gem and Satyabhāmā are called ratna. Bhagavān's true wealth is His devotees; the mineral wealth is secondary.
  • śāntiḥ — pacification
    From √śam. The chapter's resolution-word. Bhagavān's śānti — His being mollified — is the only thing Satrājit now wants. Gauḍīya bhakti: when bhagavat-śānti is the only remaining desire, the soul has crossed.
Pondering over his grievous offense and worried about the possibility of conflict with the Lord’s mighty devotees, King Satrājit thought, “How can I cleanse myself of my contamination, and how may Lord Acyuta become satisfied with me? What can I do to regain my good fortune and avoid being cursed by the populace for being so short-sighted, miserly, foolish and avaricious? I shall give my daughter, the jewel of all women, to the Lord, together with the Syamantaka jewel. That, indeed, is the only proper way to pacify Him.”
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Pondering over his grievous offense and worried about the possibility of conflict with the Lord's mighty devotees, King Satrājit thought, "How can I cleanse myself of my contamination, and how may Lord Acyuta become satisfied with me? What can I do to regain my good fortune and avoid being cursed by the populace for being so short-sighted, miserly, foolish and avaricious? I shall give my daughter, the jewel of all women, to the Lord, together with the Syamantaka jewel. That, indeed, is the only proper way to pacify Him."
Commentary

Worried about strife with strong followers of Krsna, he began to think. His thoughts are described in two and half verses.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He thought continually (anu-dhyāyan) about his sin, and because it was a great sin, he thought of only that (eva) and nothing else. He was overcome with anxiety about conflict with the powerful Lord (balavat) or his devotees because of spreading the rumor. His thoughts are then described. Kṛṣṇa does not deviate from his nature (acyutaḥ). How can I please him? All the people (janaḥ) should not curse me because my bad qualities such as being short-sighted. Thus, this jewel is not suitable for mortals like me. I am low. Therefore though I have obtained it, I should offer the jewel to the Lord. Though he asked for it, I was foolish (mūḍhaḥ) and stooped to defaming him. All these qualities have arisen because I was greedy for wealth. “How will he be satisfied with your daughter and become peaceful?” His peace, his (tasya) dissipation of sorrow, or the atonement for my offense (tasya), will result from giving the jewel of my daughter and the Syamantaka jewel. No other means, such as killing myself, will produce this atonement.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Darshana
Pondering his offense and possible conflict with Kṛṣṇa's devotees, Satrājit thinks: 'How can I cleanse myself and please Acyuta?' Plan-making after offense is part of repentance; specific outreach is required.
Reflection Questions
  • What plan-making has been waiting after a recent offense in your life?
  • Whom would you need to please specifically to cleanse the relationship?

Satrājit makes the same calculation the chapter has been making for him — give the daughter, give the jewel, end the rift. He has finally found the answer: Bhagavān can be appeased only by full surrender. The arithmetic of bhakti has, at last, been worked out on his slate.

Ambarīṣa Mahārāja's atonement

When Durvāsā cursed Mahārāja Ambarīṣa after a fast-day quarrel, the Sudarśana cakra chased Durvāsā across the three worlds. Durvāsā fled to Brahmā, to Śiva, and finally to Viṣṇu — who told him to return to Ambarīṣa and beg the devotee's forgiveness.

The Bhāgavata's logic, repeated here: offenses against Bhagavān's plan must be atoned by going to His devotees. Satrājit chooses correctly — Kṛṣṇa Himself. The path Durvāsā learned the hard way.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.43

↗
एवं व्यवसितो बुद्ध्या सत्राजित् स्वसुतां शुभाम् । मणिं च स्वयमुद्यम्य कृष्णायोपजहार ह ॥ ४३ ॥
evaṁ vyavasito buddhyā
[evam vyavasito buddhyaa]
satrājit sva-sutāṁ śubhām
[satraajit sva-sutaam shubhaam]
maṇiṁ ca svayam udyamya
[manim cha svayam udyamya]
kṛṣṇāyopajahāra ha
[krishnaayopajahaara ha]
evam — thus vyavasitaḥ — fixing his determination buddhyā — by use of intelligence satrājit — King Satrājit sva — his own sutām — daughter śubhām — fair maṇim — the jewel ca — and svayam — himself udyamya — endeavoring kṛṣṇāya — to Lord Kṛṣṇa upajahāra ha — presented .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vyavasito buddhyā
evam
thus
vyavasitaḥ
fixing his determination
buddhyā
by use of intelligence
satrājit sva-sutāṁ śubhām
satrājit
King Satrājit
sva
his own
sutām
daughter
śubhām
fair
maṇiṁ ca svayam udyamya
maṇim
the jewel
ca
and
svayam
himself
udyamya
endeavoring
kṛṣṇāyopajahāra ha
kṛṣṇāya
to Lord Kṛṣṇa
upajahāra ha
presented .
  • vyavasitaḥ buddhyā — fixing determination by intelligence
    Compound idea: vyavasita (resolved) + buddhi (intelligence, instrumental). The same vyavasāya the Gītā praises (BG 2.41) — vyavasāyātmikā buddhiḥ. Satrājit finally exhibits the Gītā-class resolution. Late, but accepted.
  • śubhām — fair, auspicious
    Accusative of śubhā. The daughter's auspiciousness is named — she is herself a mūrti of śubhā. Gauḍīya: the gift to the Lord must be śubhā, the best one has.
  • upajahāra ha — presented
    Same verb as in v.32 (Jāmbavān giving Jāmbavatī). The Bhāgavatam uses identical diction for both fathers — bear-king and Yadu-king — equalising their gift before the Lord.
Having thus intelligently made up his mind, King Satrājit personally arranged to present Lord Kṛṣṇa with his fair daughter and the Syamantaka jewel.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Having thus intelligently made up his mind, King Satrājit personally arranged to present Lord Kṛṣṇa with his fair daughter and the Syamantaka jewel.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The chief result of this arrangement of pastimes is now described. Deciding on this method, he made preparations to give his most excellent daughter, by requesting Vasudeva and others and then offered her to Kṛṣṇa. Sometimes saḥ is seen instead of ha.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He determined that he would give his daughter, most excellent (śubhām), to Kṛṣṇa. He went personally (svayam) to Vasudeva and others and made the request humbly since he was related to them, or because he had the jewel. Because he did not make the request of her marriage to Kṛṣṇa, he was a great offender.

Related values
Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Discriminative WisdomUdyama (Industriousness / Effort)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Santosha (Contentment)Titiksha (Forbearance / Endurance)Dhairya (Composure / Courage)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Having intelligently decided, Satrājit personally arranges to present Kṛṣṇa with his daughter and the Syamantaka jewel. Personal arrangement, not delegation; the offender does the work of reparation himself.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you delegate reparation work that should be personally done?
  • What 'personal arrangement' is yours to make this week?

Satrājit has worked out the answer himself — and now performs the same action with which the chapter opened, but freely. Verse 1 was atonement under duress; v.43 is atonement chosen. The Bhāgavatam loves these mirror-pairs: same act, transformed motive.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.44

↗
तां सत्यभामां भगवानुपयेमे यथाविधि । बहुभिर्याचितां शीलरूपौदार्यगुणान्विताम् ॥ ४४ ॥
tāṁ satyabhāmāṁ bhagavān
[taam satyabhaamaam bhagavaan]
upayeme yathā-vidhi
[upayeme yathaa-vidhi]
bahubhir yācitāṁ śīla-
[bahubhir yaachitaam sheela-]
rūpaudārya-guṇānvitām
[roopaudaarya-gunaanvitaam]
tām — she satyabhāmām — Satyabhāmā bhagavān — the Lord upayeme — married yathā - vidhi — by proper rituals bahubhiḥ — by many men yācitām — asked for śīla — of fine character rūpa — beauty audārya — and magnanimity guṇa — with the qualities anvitām — endowed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāṁ satyabhāmāṁ bhagavān
tām
she
satyabhāmām
Satyabhāmā
bhagavān
the Lord
upayeme yathā-vidhi
upayeme
married
yathā - vidhi
by proper rituals
bahubhir yācitāṁ śīla-
bahubhiḥ
by many men
yācitām
asked for
śīla
of fine character
rūpaudārya-guṇānvitām
rūpa
beauty
audārya
and magnanimity
guṇa
with the qualities
anvitām
endowed .
  • satyabhāmām — Satyabhāmā
    Accusative of Satyabhāmā — 'true splendour' (satya + bhāmā). Her name carries the chapter's central irony: she is the satya that the jewel-named-truth Satrājit could not see. She is the real Satya. Naming is doctrine.
  • yathā-vidhi — by proper rituals
    Compound: yathā (as) + vidhi (rule, scripture). Even Bhagavān marries by śāstric ritual — He does not exempt Himself. Gauḍīya principle: Bhagavān honours every legitimate vidhi even when He has no need of it.
  • audārya — magnanimity
    From udāra (large, generous). Audārya — generosity of spirit. The Bhāgavatam names this as a quality of the Lord's queens. Satyabhāmā is generous in spirit even before she is generous in act.
  • bahubhiḥ yācitām — asked for by many
    Compound idea: bahu (many) + yāc (request, passive participle). Many had asked; one received. Bhāgavata pattern — the Lord wins through patience what others sought through haste.
The Lord married Satyabhāmā in proper religious fashion. Possessed of excellent behavior, along with beauty, broad-mindedness and all other good qualities, she had been sought by many men.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī explains that men such as Kṛtavarmā had sought the hand of Satyabhāmā.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord married Satyabhāmā in proper religious fashion. Possessed of excellent behavior, along with beauty, broad-mindedness and all other good qualities, she had been sought by many men.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa had also brought home Jāmbavatī and married her but they arrangement did not take place in the same way, according to all the rules (yathā vidhi), since Jāmbavān’s family was not present. Because she was endowed with great character and beauty, and other accompanying qualities, she was sought by many others. It will be explained that she had been promised in marriage to Kṛtavarmā and others.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Asteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Pratijna (Vow-keeping / Sacred Resolve)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
GunaJivaSatya
The Lord marries Satyabhāmā in proper religious fashion; possessed of excellent behavior, beauty, broad-mindedness and all good qualities, she had been sought by many men. The Lord receives the high-quality bride others had hoped for.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do you grasp what should be offered to the Lord because you're afraid He'll take it from you?
  • What 'sought by many' could you freely offer?

Satyabhāmā — śīla, rūpa, audārya — comes to Kṛṣṇa not as compensation but as treasure. The chapter that opened with a jewel ends with two queens: the Lord's wealth is people. Kṛṣṇa converts every offered object back into a relationship.

Satyabhāmā weighed against Kṛṣṇa

Later in Kṛṣṇa-līlā, Satyabhāmā tried to give Him away in a tulā-bhāra ceremony — placing Kṛṣṇa on one pan and all her gold on the other. The gold could not lift Him. Only Rukmiṇī's single tulasī leaf, placed in love, balanced the scale.

The story rhymes back to this verse: Satyabhāmā, who enters the family through a jewel-narrative, will spend her marriage learning that no jewel weighs as much as a leaf given in true bhakti. Her education is long; the Bhāgavatam tells it kindly.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.45

↗
भगवानाह न मणिं प्रतीच्छामो वयं नृप । तवास्तां देवभक्तस्य वयं च फलभागिन: ॥ ४५ ॥
bhagavān āha na maṇiṁ
[bhagavaan aaha na manim]
pratīcchāmo vayaṁ nṛpa
[prateechchaamo vayam nripa]
tavāstāṁ deva-bhaktasya
[tavaastaam deva-bhaktasya]
vayaṁ ca phala-bhāginaḥ
[vayam cha phala-bhaaginah]
bhagavān — the Supreme Lord āha — said na — not maṇim — the jewel pratīcchāmaḥ — desire back vayam — We nṛpa — O King tava — yours āstām — let it remain deva — of the demigod (the sun-god Sūrya) bhaktasya — the devotee’s vayam — We ca — also phala — of its fruits bhāginaḥ — enjoyers .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
bhagavān āha na maṇiṁ
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
āha
said
na
not
maṇim
the jewel
pratīcchāmo vayaṁ nṛpa
pratīcchāmaḥ
desire back
vayam
We
nṛpa
O King
tavāstāṁ deva-bhaktasya
tava
yours
āstām
let it remain
deva
of the demigod (the sun-god Sūrya)
bhaktasya
the devotee’s
vayaṁ ca phala-bhāginaḥ
vayam
We
ca
also
phala
of its fruits
bhāginaḥ
enjoyers .
  • pratīcchāmaḥ — We desire back
    From prati + √iṣ, first person plural. The Lord uses this verb in the negative — He explicitly refuses the gem. Grammar of grace: even what is freely offered Him He returns if His real artha (the daughter) is already won. Bhagavān never hoards.
  • deva-bhaktasya — of the demigod's devotee
    Compound: deva (demigod, Sūrya) + bhakta (devotee). The Lord acknowledges Satrājit's identity as Sūrya-bhakta — He does not require exclusive devotion. Gauḍīya distinction held gently: deva-bhakti is honoured, even as Kṛṣṇa-bhakti is supreme.
  • phala-bhāginaḥ — enjoyers of the fruits
    Compound: phala (fruit) + bhāginaḥ (sharers, nominative plural). The Lord positions Himself as bhāgin — a share-holder, not a sole owner. The Bhāgavatam closes the chapter with the Lord as friend, not landlord.
The Supreme Personality of Godhead told Satrājit: We do not care to take this jewel back, O King. You are the sun-god’s devotee, so let it stay in your possession. Thus We will also enjoy its benefits.

Satrājit should have worshiped Lord Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme God. Thus there is certainly a touch of irony in Lord Kṛṣṇa’s saying “After all, you are a devotee of the sun-god.” Furthermore, Kṛṣṇa had already acquired Satrājit’s greatest treasure, the pure and beautiful Satyabhāmā. Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Fifty-sixth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “The Syamantaka Jewel.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Personality of Godhead told Satrājit: We do not care to take this jewel back, O King. You are the sun-god's devotee, so let it stay in your possession. Thus We will also enjoy its benefits.
Commentary

Let the jewel remain with you, since you are a devotee of the sun (deva bhaktasya). Since you are without a son, she is your treasure, and now that treasure is mine.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

None of us, including Balarāma will accept this gem. O king (nṛpa—protector of people), please protect your people! Kṛṣṇa utters this sarcastically. Whatever good results, seen and unseen, come from this jewel should come to us, since the jewel is my great devotee. Śrīdhara Svāmī explains that because Satrājit had no sons, the jewel would ultimately come to Kṛṣṇa anyway. Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Fifty-sixth Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled "The Syamantaka Jewel." 10.57: Satrājit Murdered, the Jewel Returned verses: Summary, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12-13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35-36, 37, 38-39, 40, 41, 42 Chapter Summary This chapter describes how Lord Kṛṣṇa, after the murder of Satrājit, killed Śatadhanvā and had Akrūra bring the Syamantaka jewel back to Dvārakā. When Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa heard that the Pāṇḍavas had supposedly been burned to death in the palace of lac, He went to Hastināpura with Lord Baladeva to maintain the principles of worldly protocol, even though, being omniscient, He knew the report was false. With Kṛṣṇa out of Dvārakā, Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā incited Śatadhanvā to steal the Syamantaka jewel from Satrājit. Bewildered by their words, the sinful Śatadhanvā murdered King Satrājit in his sleep and stole the gem. Queen Satyabhāmā was overcome with grief at the death of her father, and she rushed to Hastināpura to report the sorrowful news to Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Together with Lord Baladeva, Kṛṣṇa then returned to Dvārakā to kill Śatadhanvā. Śatadhanvā went to Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā to beg for help, but when they refused he left the jewel with Akrūra and fled for his life. Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma pursued him, and Lord Kṛṣṇa beheaded him with His sharp-edged disc. When the Lord could not find the Syamantaka jewel on Śatadhanvā's person, Baladeva told Him that Śatadhanvā must have left it in someone's care. Baladeva further suggested that Kṛṣṇa return to Dvārakā to find the jewel while He, Baladeva, would take the opportunity to visit the King of Videha. Thus Lord Balarāma traveled to Mithilā and remained there for a few years, during which He taught King Duryodhana the art of fighting with a club. Lord Kṛṣṇa returned to Dvārakā and had the funeral rites performed for Satrājit. When Akrūra and Kṛtavarmā heard how Śatadhanvā had met his death, they fled Dvārakā. Soon many kinds of disturbances-mental, physical and so on-began to afflict Dvārakā, and the citizens concluded that the cause of these troubles must be Akrūra's exile. The city elders explained, "Once there was a drought in Benares, and the king of the region gave his daughter in marriage to Akrūra's father, who was visiting Benares at the time. As a result of this gift, the drought ended." The elders, thinking Akrūra had the same power as his father, declared that Akrūra should be brought back. Lord Kṛṣṇa knew that Akrūra's exile was not the main cause of the disturbances. Still, He had Akrūra brought back to Dvārakā, and after properly honoring him with worship and greeting him with sweet words, Kṛṣṇa told him, "I know Śatadhanvā left the jewel in your care. Since Satrājit had no sons, his daughter's offspring are the just claimants to whatever property he has left behind. Nonetheless, it would be best for you to keep the troublesome jewel in your care. Just let Me show it once to My relatives." Akrūra presented Kṛṣṇa with the jewel, which shone as brilliantly as the sun, and after the Lord had shown it to His family members He returned it to Akrūra.

Related values
Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)Bhakti (Devotion)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)
Related verses
Kṛṣṇa tells Satrājit: We do not care to take this jewel back; You are the sun-god's devotee, so let it stay with you — We will also enjoy its benefits. The Lord returns the gift and includes Himself in its benefit; generosity exceeds the offering.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does Kṛṣṇa return your offering enhanced rather than keeping it?
  • How does His non-grasping change your future offerings?

Bhagavān finally refuses the gem. He has cleared His name, gained two queens, and now hands the wealth back. The chapter that began with one man clutching a jewel ends with the only being who could keep it forever giving it back, calling Himself a 'co-enjoyer of its fruits' — i.e., a friend.

Sudāmā's broken rice

Sudāmā the poor brāhmaṇa brought a small twist of cloth holding chipped rice as his only gift for Kṛṣṇa — and Kṛṣṇa, eating it joyfully, returned him a palace of opulence without his asking.

The Bhāgavata pattern repeats: the Lord refuses the gem outright in this verse exactly as He once refused to keep Sudāmā's rice without returning a kingdom for it. He receives only love; everything else He hands back. Satrājit, like Sudāmā, ends richer than the kingdom-holder.

📝 My note