Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.56.9
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
bāla-vacanam
—
childish words
Compound: bāla (child) + vacanam (speech). The Lord names His devotees' over-eager praise as bāla — and this is praise, not censure. Bhakti is consistently called bāla-bhāva in the Bhāgavatam; childlike, not childish.
-
prahasya
—
smiling broadly
Gerund of pra + √has. The Bhāgavatam's signature verb for Kṛṣṇa's mood with devotees. He laughs often in this canto — at Brahmā, at Yaśodā, at Indra. Here at His own citizens. The smile is the answer.
-
ambuja-locanaḥ
—
He whose eyes are like lotuses
Compound: ambuja (water-born, lotus) + locanaḥ (whose eyes). Returns to the eye-imagery of verse 6 — the eyes that the citizens just praised are now smiling at them. Their darśana is being returned.
Kṛṣṇa smiled in the beginning (pra—hasya). Then with an intention of somewhat spreading the correct view, spoke distinctly (pra—aha) with a smiling glance (ambuja-locanaḥ). He is not a devatā but only a human. At that, he is only Satrājit. Though Kṛṣṇa had the Kaustubha jewel, he spoke to reveal things according to his desire to astonish others. Śrīdhara Svāmī explains that bāla-vacanam means “words of ignorant people,” who thought that someone was the sun god who was actually not. There was a commotion because of thinking the sun god had come. They did not understand that Kṛṣṇa was supreme.
Kṛṣṇa smiled in the beginning (pra—hasya). Then with an intention of somewhat spreading the correct view, spoke distinctly (pra—aha) with a smiling glance (ambuja-locanaḥ). He is not a devatā but only a human. At that, he is only Satrājit. “Why was Satrājit appearing in this manner?” He shines because of the jewel, given by the sun god. These were the words of children (bāla-vacanam). The other inhabitants of Dvārakā could not have such ignorance.
- Where do you correct with severity what could be corrected with a smile?
- How does humor make truth easier to receive?
Kṛṣṇa's broad smile at the citizens' theology is the smile of a father correcting a beloved child's grammar — not the smile of a teacher mocking error. He prefers their over-eager devotion to any cool accuracy. Then He tells them the truth.
My note
Source: vedabase.io