FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

10.83 · Draupadī Meets the Queens of Kṛṣṇa

38 verses · 🖨 Class prep
D Open on bhagavata.keshavaswami.com ↗
Read summary inline (23493 chars)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Krishna visited Indraprastha and orchestrated Jarasandha’s demise. He thus assisted the Pandavas to complete the Rajasuya sacrifice, and killed Sisupala in the process. After returning to Dwaraka, a variety of demons attempted to attack Krishna and Balarama, all of whom were entirely unsuccessful. Sukadeva Goswami then described Krishna’s loving dealings with Sudama, the Vrindavana residents, Srutadeva and Bahulasva. In the concluding chapters of Canto Ten, a selection of incidents and dialogues further confirm Krishna’s divinity as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. [ 34 ]

Previous The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam Next Rajasuya, Jarasandha and Sisupala Last updated 1 year ago

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90)

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Krishna visited Indraprastha and orchestrated Jarasandha’s demise. He thus assisted the Pandavas to complete the Rajasuya sacrifice, and killed Sisupala in the process. After returning to Dwaraka, a variety of demons attempted to attack Krishna and Balarama, all of whom were entirely unsuccessful. Sukadeva Goswami then described Krishna’s loving dealings with Sudama, the Vrindavana residents, Srutadeva and Bahulasva. In the concluding chapters of Canto Ten, a selection of incidents and dialogues further confirm Krishna’s divinity as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. [ 34 ]

Previous The Dwaraka Queens hear Srimad-Bhagavatam Next Rajasuya, Jarasandha and Sisupala Last updated 1 year ago

Atheism

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Atheism “Life is without purpose for one who remains ignorant of his most well-wishing benefactor and thus fails to worship Him. Such a person’s breathing is no better than the breathing of a blacksmith’s bellows. The gift of human life is a fortunate opportunity for the conditioned soul, but by turning away from his Lord, the living being commits spiritual suicide. In the words of Sri Isopanisad (3) : “The killer of the soul, whoever he may be, must enter into the planets known as the worlds of the faithless, full of darkness and ignorance.” Asuryah means “to be obtained by demons,” and demons are persons who have no devotion for the Supreme Lord, Vishnu. This definition is stated in the Agni Purana: “There are two kinds of created beings in this world, godly and demoniac. Those dedicated to the devotional service of Lord Vishnu are godly, and those opposed to such service are demoniac.”” ( SB 10.87.17 ) The final section of Canto Ten depicts a spectrum of personalities. On one hand we find inimical demons looking for the ideal moment to destroy Krishna and establish their supremacy. On the other extreme we find selfless devotees who lose thought of their own existence while meditating on how to please Krishna. The Chaitanya-Charitamrita compares Krishna to the sun and maya to darkness. Where there is Krishna, and genuine consciousness of Him, there cannot be maya, just as the presence of sun immediately dissipates darkness. Thus, where the sun of Krishna is blocked out, atheism will surely prevail, and the darkness of quarrel, hypocrisy and materialism will cover the world. Atheism manifests in a variety of shapes and sizes: Default Atheists – those who disbelieve even though they have never really thought about it. The big questions don’t resonate with them, and blindly accepting atheistic theories of life justifies their lethargy in exploration. For such people, ignorance is bliss. Philosophical Atheists - those who profess that belief in God is intellectually immature and philosophically naive. Although they themselves lack empirical back-up, they present their explanations, elaborately worded and stylishly packaged, as the rational alternative. Emotional Atheists – those whose disbelief is driven by disenchantment. Disgusted with hypocrisy, malpractice and materialism in the name of religion, they turn away. There are also people who experience suffering, trauma and personal challenges, unable to understand why a loving God would be so absent-minded and aloof. Feeling letdown, they emotionally disconnect. Covered Atheists – those who assert that, though temporarily deluded, we are all ultimately God, part of the spiritual oneness and universal consciousness. Though they present themselves in theological garb, this existential position removes the distinction and relationship between human and Supreme, and thus veers towards godlessness. Statistical polls suggest that just over 30% of UK residents are self-proclaimed atheists. In terms of the above categories, it’s not quite clear what the breakdown would be. It’s quite likely, however, that the largest number of atheists may well come from an entirely different category. Maybe a good portion of the 70% of ‘believers’ could also be atheists: Psychological Atheists – those who profess to believe in God, but repeatedly demonstrate their inability to consciously live in His presence. They may dress spiritual, talk spiritual, and act spiritual, yet simultaneously maintain an egocentric mind-set. For such persons, God is in the picture, but they are the stars of the show. It sounds crazy, but we can end up using God in our attempt to usurp His position!

Previous Krishna’s Supremacy Next The Mood of the Spiritual World Last updated 1 year ago

The Mood of the Spiritual World

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Atheism The Mood of the Spiritual World Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati often told his disciples – “Don’t try and see God, but act in such a way that God will want to see you.” It is the devotees’ devotional disposition, sincerity and purity of consciousness that attracts divine attention and invokes the company of God. Mindful – the Lord’s devotees are fixed in spontaneous remembrance of Him. While going about their daily duties and fulfilling their worldly responsibilities, their minds are completely fixed on Krishna. While the practitioner devotee forces himself to be mindful of Krishna, the pure devotee can’t get Krishna out of his mind. Indeed, Krishna declares: “The devotees are always in My heart, and I am always in the hearts of the devotees. The devotee does not know anything beyond Me, and I also cannot forget the devotee.” (SB 9.4.68) Useful – Srila Prabhupada repeatedly translated bhakti as ‘devotional service.’ He continually emphasised that it’s not simply an emotion or feeling, but a tangible exchange. We therefore find that the most intimate devotees are ready to sacrifice anything and go to incredible lengths to serve and please the Lord. They serve with no expectation of gain or personal benefit. The Srimad-Bhagavatam summarises the two main qualities contained within the pure devotional attitude: “The supreme occupation [ dharma ] for all humanity is that by which men can attain to loving devotional service unto the transcendent Lord. Such devotional service must be unmotivated and uninterrupted to completely satisfy the self.” (SB 1.2.6) Faithful – Krishna declares in the Bhagavad-gita that He reciprocates with devotees according to their faith and surrender. He doesn’t force Himself into anyone’s life, but when they show the desire to connect with Him, He becomes enthusiastically active. The devotees thus gain incredible faith in Krishna. They experience the sweet protection and mercy of Krishna time and time again, and thus are able to fully place themselves under His jurisdiction without any reservation. They know that if they simply serve Krishna and take shelter of Him, they will achieve everything in life: “ Sraddha is confident, firm faith that by rendering transcendental loving service to Krishna one automatically performs all subsidiary activities. Such faith is favourable to the discharge of devotional service.” (CC Madhya 22.62) Joyful – when our loving propensity is fully invested in Krishna without any diversion or adulteration, then one discovers boundless spiritual joy. Everything that grabs the attention of conditioned souls becomes insignificant to a pure devotee. Prabhodananda Saraswati explains: “For a devotee, the pleasure of merging into the existence of Brahman is considered hellish. Similarly, he considers promotion to heavenly planets just another kind of phantasmagoria. The yogis meditate for sense control, but for the devotee the senses appear like serpents with broken teeth. The whole material world appears joyful for a devotee, and even great personalities like Lord Brahma and Lord Indra are considered no better than insects. Such is the position of a devotee who has received but a small glance of the mercy of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Unto this most magnanimous personality I offer my respectful obeisances.” (Chaitanya Chandramrita 5) Merciful – the natural effect of such happiness is the desire to want to share it with others. Thus, devotees are always finding ingenious ways and means to bring others into contact with Krishna. In fact, the most confidential servants of Srimati Radharani, the manjaris , come to this world as eminent preachers to guide the conditioned souls back to their original home. Prahlada Maharaja sums up the mood of such a preacher: “My dear Lord Nrsinghadeva, I see that there are many saintly persons indeed, but they are interested only in their own deliverance. Not caring for the big cities and towns, they go to the Himalayas or the forest to meditate with vows of silence. They are not interested in delivering others. As for me, however, I do not wish to be liberated alone, leaving aside all these poor fools and rascals. I know that without Krishna consciousness, without taking shelter of Your lotus feet, one cannot be happy. Therefore I wish to bring them back to shelter at Your lotus feet.” (SB 7.9.44)

Previous Atheism Next S.U.M Last updated 1 year ago

Balarama kills Romaharsana and Balvala

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Balarama kills Romaharsana and Balvala Chapter 78, 79 When the Pandavas and Kauravas prepared for war, Balarama, desiring to remain neutral, went on pilgrimage. When He arrived in Naimisaranya, Romaharsana Suta was lecturing to the assembled sages. While sitting on the speaker’s dais ( vyasasana ), Romaharsana failed to respectfully acknowledge Balarama, and for this offence he was immediately killed. Seeing that the assembled sages were somewhat disturbed by this, Balarama awarded Romaharsana’s son (Ugrasrava, or Suta Goswami) a long life in teaching scripture. To further pacify the sages, Balarama killed Balvala, a demon who was disturbing their sacrifices. He continued His travels, and upon reaching Kuruksetra He attempted to stop the mace battle between Duryodhana and Bhima. Their deep- rooted enmity, however, was unrelenting, and Balarama thus decided to depart and resume His sacred pilgrimage.

Previous Salva, Dantavakra and Viduranath Slayed Next Sudama Vipra Last updated 1 year ago

Krishna Blesses His Devotees

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Krishna Blesses His Devotees Chapter 86 Maharaja Pariksit was inquisitive as to how Arjuna and Subhadra, his grandfather and grandmother, were married. Sukadeva Goswami narrated the story and depicted how Krishna unfailingly reciprocates with His devotees. Whilst on pilgrimage incognito, Arjuna came to Prabhasa, where he heard that Balarama was arranging a marriage between Subhadra and Duryodhana. Enchanted by her beauty, Arjuna kidnapped Subhadra at an opportune moment and valiantly fended off the outraged opponents. All of this was sanctioned by Krishna, and although Balarama was annoyed, the Lord expertly pacified Him. In Videha (Mithila), lived Srutadeva, a poor brahmana , and Bahulasva, the ruler of the kingdom, who both worshipped the Lord with heartfelt bhakti . Pleased with them, Krishna personally visited both their homes – one was very simple, and the other supremely opulent. They both received the Lord with great love and devotion, offered prayers of gratitude, and achieved the supreme destination, highlighting that one’s material circumstance is no impediment to bhakti .

Previous Kuruksetra Meeting Next Krishna’s Supremacy Last updated 1 year ago

Krishna’s Supremacy

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Krishna’s Supremacy Chapter 87, 88, 89, 90 Maharaja Pariksit was puzzled as to how the Vedas could describe the Lord, who is beyond the scope of language and syllables. Sukadeva Goswami cited a conversation between Narada and Narayana Rishi in which the same question was asked. Narayana Rishi cited an explanation by Sanandana-kumara, who had once narrated the prayers uttered by the personified Vedas at the dawn of creation. The prayers concluded with the affirmation: “The srutis , following their method of eliminating everything separate from the Supreme, become successful by revealing You as their final conclusion.” Maharaja Pariksit then enquired why Siva’s devotees procure opulence, while Vishnu’s devotees are often poverty stricken. Sukadeva Goswami explained how Siva is in contact with the material modes, while Vishnu transcends them, and the worshippers thus adopt similar qualities. When Maharaja Yuddhistira asked the same question, Krishna famously replied that when He especially favours a devotee, He strips him of all opulence ( yasyaham anugrhnami )! When awarded material opulence, the danger is that one could become proud, intoxicated and forgetful of the real spiritual wealth of life. The example of this is Vrikasura, who was informed by Narada Muni that Lord Siva is very easily pleased. He began worshipping Siva by mutilating his own body, but when his sacrifices yielded no reciprocation he resolved to decapitate himself. Siva suddenly appeared and offered him any boon he desired. Vrikasura requested that whoever’s head he would touch would smash to pieces. Siva reluctantly benedicted him, and Vrikasura immediately chased Siva to test the boon! Siva fled, and only when the Lord intervened as an innocent brahmacari and duped Vrikasura into touching his own head, was he saved. Once, when a discussion regarding the identity of the Supreme deity ensued, the sages deputed Brighu Muni to investigate the matter. Brighu offended Brahma mentally, Siva verbally, and Vishnu physically – but Vishnu’s incredible tolerance highlighted His greatness, and Brighu confidently concluded that Vishnu was indeed supreme. On another occasion, Arjuna vowed to protect the newborn children of a brahmana , but was unable to do so. Disappointed with himself and bound by his word, Arjuna resolved to end his life. Krishna, however, stopped Arjuna and took him to the abode of Maha Vishnu. When they arrived, it came to light that Maha Vishnu had orchestrated the entire intrigue just to receive an audience with Krishna and Arjuna. Even Maha Vishnu yearns to see the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna! Krishna continued His astonishing activities in Dwaraka, where the queens relished beautiful pastimes with Him every day. In the ecstasy of love, the queens would madly converse with the ocean, moon, clouds, winds, mountains and various birds, remembering the enchanting love of their life. Krishna’s family expanded, and later, after the Yadu dynasty would be annihilated, Vajranabha (the son of Aniruddha and Rocana) would remain one of the few survivors. Canto Ten concludes: “By regularly hearing, chanting and meditating on the beautiful topics of Lord Mukunda with ever-increasing sincerity, a mortal being will attain the divine kingdom of the Lord, where the inviolable power of death holds no sway.”

Previous Krishna Blesses His Devotees Next Atheism Last updated 1 year ago

Kuruksetra Meeting

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Kuruksetra Meeting Chapter 82, 83, 84, 85 Anticipating a solar eclipse, the Yadavas travelled to Samanta Pancaka, in Kuruksetra, as did the Vrindavana residents and many others. It was an emotionally charged reunion with His most intimate associates. The gopis saw Krishna with their eyes and lovingly embraced Him in their hearts, overwhelmed with spiritual emotion after an extended period of separation. Krishna approached them, smiled, and glorified their unique intensity of love. The deep heartfelt desire of the gopis was to bring Krishna back to Vrindavana. Krishna asked Maharaja Yuddhistira about his well-being, while Draupadi enquired how each queen came to marry Krishna. They all explained their stories, recounting the extraordinary strength, charm, and ingenuity of Krishna. During this time, a host of illustrious sages appeared at Kuruksetra, and Krishna warmly greeted them. He glorified the saintly souls, who purify the world by their presence. Vasudeva humbly enquired from them, and then requested they oversee the various sacrifices. Nanda Maharaja and the cowherds, full of affection for Krishna and the Yadu members, eventually returned to Vrindavana after repeatedly postponing that ominous journey for several months. Once, Vasudeva called his two sons and disclosed the fact that he understood Their supreme identity. Krishna played down His own divinity, much preferring to relate to Vasudeva free of that formal acknowledgement. Later, Devaki requested Krishna to bring back her dead sons, just as He had done for Sandipani Muni. The Lord thus travelled to Sutala and personally retrieved the boys with Bali Maharaja’s help. When those children drank the breast milk of Devaki, they were reinstated in their forms as demigods and thus ascended to the heavens.

Previous Sudama Vipra Next Krishna Blesses His Devotees Last updated 1 year ago

Rajasuya, Jarasandha and Sisupala

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Rajasuya, Jarasandha and Sisupala Chapter 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 Uddhava knew that Jarasandha had to be killed before the Rajasuya sacrifice could be performed, and he thus advised the Lord to visit Indraprastha. When Krishna arrived there, the Pandavas received Him with great happiness, crying tears of joy. Kunti, Draupadi and all the citizens eagerly came to see Krishna, bringing gifts and beautiful offerings of love. For the glorification of Krishna, Maharaja Yuddhistira selflessly decided to perform the Rajasuya sacrifice: “Let the people of this world see the power of devotional service to You” he proclaimed. The Pandavas thus conquered all directions until only Jarasandha remained. Following Uddhava’s plan, Krishna, Bhima and Arjuna disguised themselves as brahmanas and visited Jarasandha. Though suspicious, he received them respectfully and enquired what charity he could offer them. They suddenly revealed their true identities and challenged Jarasandha to a duel. Jarasandha laughed, considering Bhima to be the only worthy opponent. The fight ensued, and after a gruelling exchange of blows, Krishna glanced at Bhima and split a branch in half, hinting that this was the means of victory. Bhima understood the cryptic clue, grabbed one of Jarasandha’s legs while stepping on the other, ripped him in two, and thus emerged victorious. The kings imprisoned by Jarasandha, emaciated and weak, were freed, and Krishna instructed them in their duties. After profusely thanking Him and praying for pure devotion, they departed for their respective kingdoms while Krishna, Bhima and Arjuna returned to Indraprastha and delivered the good news to Maharaja Yuddhistira. Maharaja Yuddhistira then initiated the Rajasuya sacrifice and unhesitatingly selected Krishna as the personality worthy of first worship ( agra-puja ). The King bathed His feet and offered words of praise while everyone happily looked on in approval. Sisupala, however, was unable to tolerate the glorification of Krishna. In a sudden outburst, he stood up and launched vicious words of blasphemy at Krishna, criticising His character and activities. Krishna patiently heard his insults but the assembled kings were itching to attack him. Krishna then intervened, released His Sudarshan Chakra, and decapitated Sisupala in one clean shot. The yajna was successfully completed and Maharaja Yuddhistira encouraged his friends, allies, and particularly Krishna, to remain in Indraprastha for some time longer. Seeing Maharaja Yuddhistira’s prosperity, Duryodhana seethed with envy. One day, in Maharaja Yuddhistira’s mystical palace expertly crafted by Maya Danava, Duryodhana was befooled by the architecture and publicly humiliated. The Kaurava warrior quickly left, his fury irrevocably inflamed. Now he was hell-bent on revenge.

Previous D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Next Salva, Dantavakra and Viduranath Slayed Last updated 1 year ago

Salva, Dantavakra and Viduranath Slayed

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Salva, Dantavakra and Viduranath Slayed Chapter 76, 77, 78 Salva, who had been defeated at Rukmini’s abduction, worshipped Siva to gain revenge against the Yadus. Siva awarded him with a flying, iron city named Saubha. Thus equipped, Salva bombarded Dwaraka, but Pradyumna valiantly fended him off for many days. The battle between Salva and the Yadus lasted for twenty-seven days, until Krishna arrived back from Indraprastha. Defying Salva’s illusory tricks, Krishna released His spinning disc, Sudarshan Chakra, and killed the demoniac magician. Dantavakra, Salva’s associate, took a vow to avenge his friend’s death, but Krishna effortlessly bludgeoned his chest. Viduranath, Dantavakra’s brother, also decided to attack Krishna, but he met a similar fate as Salva, being decapitated by the Sudarshan Chakra. Having annihilated these demons, Krishna visited Vrindavana for two months, and then returned to Dwaraka.

Previous Rajasuya, Jarasandha and Sisupala Next Balarama kills Romaharsana and Balvala Last updated 1 year ago

Sudama Vipra

Canto 10 (Part 2)

D – Demons, Devotees and Divinity (71-90) Sudama Vipra Chapters 80, 81 Sudama, a poor brahmana , was repeatedly requested by his wife to beg some charity from Krishna. He reluctantly agreed, and journeyed to Dwaraka with four handfuls of flattened rice tied in a torn cloth, as a gift. When he arrived at the lavish palace, Krishna heartily greeted His childhood friend and offered reverential worship. The astonished residents looked on while the two friends happily recounted their childhood memories and school days. They particularly recalled the humble service rendered to their guru, Sandipani Muni, reflecting on how satisfaction of one’s spiritual master is the essence of success in life. Krishna eagerly requested His gift, but Sudama was hesitant to present the modest offering. Krishna forcibly snatched it and enthusiastically ate one handful of rice, after which Rukmini quickly stopped Him. Sudama had pleased the Lord with his simple, but pure, devotion, in which he harboured no selfish desire. Overjoyed and fully satisfied at having seen Krishna, Sudama set off without requesting anything. When he arrived at his home, however, he saw it had been miraculously transformed into an opulent palace, and his wife appeared like a demigoddess. He happily accepted it as the mercy of the Lord, continued with his steady devotion and finally attained perfection. If one gives to Krishna, he will never be the loser.

Previous Balarama kills Romaharsana and Balvala Next Kuruksetra Meeting Last updated 1 year ago

— S.B. Keshava Swami, Book Bhagavata

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.1

↗
श्रीशुक उवाच तथानुगृह्य भगवान् गोपीनां स गुरुर्गति: । युधिष्ठिरमथापृच्छत् सर्वांश्च सुहृदोऽव्ययम् ॥ १ ॥
śrī-śuka uvāca
[shree-shuka uvaacha]
tathānugṛhya bhagavān
[tathaanugrihya bhagavaan]
gopīnāṁ sa gurur gatiḥ
[gopeenaam sa gurur gatih]
yudhiṣṭhiram athāpṛcchat
[yudhishthiram athaaprichchat]
sarvāṁś ca suhṛdo ’vyayam
[sarvaamsh cha suhrido ’vyayam]
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca — Śukadeva Gosvāmī said tathā — in this way anugṛhya — showing favor bhagavān — the Supreme Lord gopīnām — of the young cowherd women saḥ — He guruḥ — their spiritual master gatiḥ — and goal yudhiṣṭhiram — from Yudhiṣṭhira atha — then apṛcchat — He inquired sarvān — all ca — and su - hṛdaḥ — His well-wishing relatives avyayam — welfare .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-śuka uvāca
śrī - śukaḥ uvāca
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said
tathānugṛhya bhagavān
tathā
in this way
anugṛhya
showing favor
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
gopīnāṁ sa gurur gatiḥ
gopīnām
of the young cowherd women
saḥ
He
guruḥ
their spiritual master
gatiḥ
and goal
yudhiṣṭhiram athāpṛcchat
yudhiṣṭhiram
from Yudhiṣṭhira
atha
then
apṛcchat
He inquired
sarvāṁś ca suhṛdo ’vyayam
sarvān
all
ca
and
su - hṛdaḥ
His well-wishing relatives
avyayam
welfare .
  • gopīnām — of the cowherd women
    Genitive plural of gopī. The verse names Kṛṣṇa as the gopīnāṁ guruḥ — the guru of the gopīs — placing the supreme mādhurya-bhaktas at the head of the sentence even when the scene shifts to Hastināpura. For Gauḍīyas this is no incidental adjective: the gopīs' bhāva remains Kṛṣṇa's own most-honored possession everywhere He goes.
  • guruḥ — spiritual master
    Bhagavān is Himself the guru of the gopīs, not a teacher they sought. Gauḍīya theology reads this as caitya-guru — the Lord within — manifesting outwardly. The same Kṛṣṇa who plays as their beloved is also the inner teacher whose mercy enabled their love.
  • gatiḥ — goal, destination
    Gati is the resting-point at which a soul stops travelling. Pairing guruḥ with gatiḥ frames the gopīs' relationship in one breath — He is both the path and the place arrived at, a Gauḍīya formula echoed throughout the Bhāgavatam.
  • anugṛhya — having shown favor
    From anu + √grah — to take hold of with mercy. The participle implies the act is complete before the next sentence begins: Kṛṣṇa first finishes the mercy upon the gopīs, then turns to the kṣatriyas. The verse refuses to let the reader skip past Vraja-rasa on the way to Kuru politics.
  • su - hṛdaḥ — well-wishing relatives
    Compound suhṛt (good-hearted) — one who wishes well without expecting return. Kṛṣṇa is called suhṛt sarva-bhūtānām in the Gītā; here the same word is reflected back from His own kinsmen, marking the reciprocal warmth that makes Dvārakā-Hastināpura one extended family of the Lord.
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Thus Lord Kṛṣṇa, the spiritual master of the gopīs and the very purpose of their life, showed them His mercy. He then met with Yudhiṣṭhira and all His other relatives and inquired from them about their welfare.

The words gurur gatiḥ have been translated here in their usual sense: “spiritual master and goal.” Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, however, points out an additional meaning: While Lord Kṛṣṇa is the goal for all sādhus in general, for the gopīs specifically He is that goal which is guru, “predominant,” in the sense of completely eclipsing the significance of all other possible goals.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: Thus Lord Kṛṣṇa, the spiritual master of the gopīs and the very purpose of their life, showed them His mercy. He then met with Yudhiṣṭhira and all His other relatives and inquired from them about their welfare.
Commentary

In the eighty third chapter Krsna is praised by his friends. On inquiry from Draupadi the queens of Krsna describe how he married them. Just as Krsna satisfied the gopis, so (tatha) Krsna, he was merciful to the others . He inquired from Yudhisthira and all his other friends concerning their welfare or auspciousness. He is the goal of all devotees, but he is the greatest object of love for the gopis (guru gatih).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Having summarized the conversation of the gopīs with Kṛṣṇa on their first day of meeting, other dealings on other days are understood. He made them understand that just as he was the guru he was their attainment. This was the essence of his instructions. Secondarily his conversations with Yudhiṣṭhira and others are praised. He gave the gopīs mercy according to their prayer (tathā) because he alone was their instructor and the goal whom they eternally possessed (gatiḥ). After that (atha) he inquired from Yudhiṣṭhira since their fate until that time had been unclear. It is understood that previous to this he had not asked them, what to speak of other persons. This description is given to show that Kṛṣṇa valued the gopīs most of all. He inquired about Yudhiṣṭhira’s health free of injury (avyayam).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

By speaking or in that way (tathā), the Lord showed mercy to the gopīs because he was their instructor (guru) and their goal, the means and object of attainment. After that (atha), since he should give the gopīs mercy first since they were the best, with special prema, he met with Yudhiṣṭhira. He is mentioned first since he was dearest, as the king, and the best among friends.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
Concepts
Guru
Kṛṣṇa showed mercy to the gopīs and then met Yudhiṣṭhira and other relatives, inquiring after their welfare. The Lord moves freely between intimate and family circles; both receive His full attention.
Reflection Questions
  • How do I move between intimate and family circles in my own life — fully present in each, or distracted in both?
  • What does full attention in each setting look like?

Kṛṣṇa, having finished consoling the gopīs of Vraja with the rasa He alone can give, now turns to His Hastināpura kinsmen with the same attentiveness — like a master cook who, having served the inner family the deepest dish, comes to the outer guests and asks if their plates are filled. The Lord's mercy has no leftover quality; the same Bhagavān who is gopīnāṁ guruḥ for the milkmaids is the courteous well-wisher inquiring after Yudhiṣṭhira.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.2

↗
त एवं लोकनाथेन परिपृष्टा: सुसत्कृता: । प्रत्यूचुर्हृष्टमनसस्तत्पादेक्षाहतांहस: ॥ २ ॥
ta evaṁ loka-nāthena
[ta evam loka-naathena]
paripṛṣṭāḥ su-sat-kṛtāḥ
[pariprishtaah su-sat-kritaah]
pratyūcur hṛṣṭa-manasas
[pratyoochur hrishta-manasas]
tat-pādekṣā-hatāṁhasaḥ
[tat-paadekshaa-hataamhasah]
te — they (Yudhiṣṭhira and Lord Kṛṣṇa’s other relatives) evam — thus loka — of the universe nāthena — by the Lord paripṛṣṭāḥ — questioned su — very much sat - kṛtāḥ — honored pratyūcuḥ — replied hṛṣṭa — joyful manasaḥ — whose minds tat — His pāda — the feet īkṣā — by seeing hata — destroyed aṁhasaḥ — whose sins .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ta evaṁ loka-nāthena
te
they (Yudhiṣṭhira and Lord Kṛṣṇa’s other relatives)
evam
thus
loka
of the universe
nāthena
by the Lord
paripṛṣṭāḥ su-sat-kṛtāḥ
paripṛṣṭāḥ
questioned
su
very much
sat - kṛtāḥ
honored
pratyūcur hṛṣṭa-manasas
pratyūcuḥ
replied
hṛṣṭa
joyful
manasaḥ
whose minds
tat-pādekṣā-hatāṁhasaḥ
tat
His
pāda
the feet
īkṣā
by seeing
hata
destroyed
aṁhasaḥ
whose sins .
  • pāda — the feet (of the Lord)
    Pāda — the constant Gauḍīya object of meditation. Throughout this chapter (verses 8, 11, 15-16, 39, 40, 41-42, 43) the word recurs as the queens' single shared longing. Verse 2 plants it early: even sight of those feet destroys sin.
  • īkṣā — by seeing
    From √īkṣ — to look. Gauḍīya śāstra ranks darśana of the Lord (or of His vigraha, His devotee, His Vraja-bhūmi) as itself purifying — no other sādhana required at the moment the gaze lands.
  • hata — destroyed
    Past participle of √han. The sins are not gradually wiped but struck dead — same root as Kṛṣṇa's slaying of demons. Pāda-darśana is itself a weapon.
  • aṁhasaḥ — whose sins
    Aṁhas — sin, narrowness, distress. The genitive frames the kings: those whose sins are slain. The verse stations the antidote (seeing Kṛṣṇa's feet) immediately beside the disease (aṁhas).
  • hṛṣṭa — joyful
    From √hṛṣ — to bristle, to thrill. Hṛṣṭa-manas describes the precise Gauḍīya symptom of bhāva: the mind itself stands on end before the Lord. The reply that follows is not duty-speech; it is overflowing rasa.
Feeling greatly honored, King Yudhiṣṭhira and the others, freed of all sinful reactions by seeing the feet of the Lord of the universe, gladly answered His inquiries.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Feeling greatly honored, King Yudhiṣṭhira and the others, freed of all sinful reactions by seeing the feet of the Lord of the universe, gladly answered His inquiries.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

In order, they were asked thoroughly by the Lord of all the worlds and honored nicely with various gifts. Then they became joyful in mind by his merciful presence. All their sufferings were destroyed by seeing his lotus feet. Yudhiṣṭhira and others then spoke.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

After the gopīs Yudhiṣṭhira and others (te) were thoroughly questioned by the Lord. The main reason was to make them happy since he had first pacified the gopīs. They were worshipped with fragrance and flowers by his mercy (su-sat-kṛtāḥ). Or they were honored by the questions—because he was the protector of the worlds. Or even though Kṛṣṇa was the Lord of the universe, he worshipped them and they were happy. The reason for everything was that they saw the feet of the Lord. By that their remaining prārabdha sins or sufferings were destroyed.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)
Related verses
Yudhiṣṭhira and the others, freed of all sinful reactions by seeing the Lord's feet, gladly answered His inquiries. Even before the conversation, the meeting purified them. Encounter precedes content.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my meetings with the Lord do I focus on content when the encounter itself does the work?
  • What changes when I trust the meeting more than the words?

A traveller's dust is washed off the moment his feet touch the threshold of his own house — likewise the kings' inner stain falls away simply by their eyes resting on Kṛṣṇa's feet. Darśana of those feet is itself the bath; their joy in answering Him is the towel that dries them.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.3

↗
कुतोऽशिवं त्वच्चरणाम्बुजासवं महन्मनस्तो मुखनि:सृतं क्व‍‍चित् । पिबन्ति ये कर्णपुटैरलं प्रभो देहंभृतां देहकृदस्मृतिच्छिदम् ॥ ३ ॥
kuto ’śivaṁ tvac-caraṇāmbujāsavaṁ
[kuto ’shivam tvach-charanaambujaasavam]
mahan-manasto mukha-niḥsṛtaṁ kvacit
[mahan-manasto mukha-nihsritam kvachit]
pibanti ye karṇa-puṭair alaṁ prabho
[pibanti ye karna-putair alam prabho]
dehaṁ-bhṛtāṁ deha-kṛd-asmṛti-cchidam
[deham-bhritaam deha-krid-asmriti-chchidam]
kutaḥ — from where aśivam — inauspiciousness tvat — Your caraṇa — of the feet ambuja — lotuslike āsavam — the intoxicating nectar mahat — of great souls manastaḥ — from the minds mukha — through their mouths niḥsṛtam — poured out kvacit — at any time pibanti — drink ye — who karṇa — of their ears puṭaiḥ — with the drinking cups alam — as much as they wish prabho — O master deham — material bodies bhṛtām — for those who possess deha — of bodies kṛt — about the creator asmṛti — of forgetfulness chidam — the eradicator .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
kuto ’śivaṁ tvac-caraṇāmbujāsavaṁ
kutaḥ
from where
aśivam
inauspiciousness
tvat
Your
caraṇa
of the feet
ambuja
lotuslike
mahan-manasto mukha-niḥsṛtaṁ kvacit
āsavam
the intoxicating nectar
mahat
of great souls
manastaḥ
from the minds
mukha
through their mouths
niḥsṛtam
poured out
kvacit
at any time
pibanti ye karṇa-puṭair alaṁ prabho
pibanti
drink
ye
who
karṇa
of their ears
puṭaiḥ
with the drinking cups
alam
as much as they wish
prabho
O master
dehaṁ-bhṛtāṁ deha-kṛd-asmṛti-cchidam
deham
material bodies
bhṛtām
for those who possess
deha
of bodies
kṛt
about the creator
asmṛti
of forgetfulness
chidam
the eradicator .
  • āsavam — intoxicating nectar
    Āsava is a fermented honey-wine. The verse deliberately uses the most charged word for liquor and applies it to Hari-kathā: the bhakta is not sober, he is intoxicated — but by Kṛṣṇa's feet, not by viṣaya. The Gauḍīyas read this as the rasa-tattva embedded in even the dvārakā-līlā.
  • caraṇa - ambuja — lotus feet
    Caraṇa (foot) + ambuja (lotus-born). The compound is the single most-repeated Gauḍīya meditation-object. Note: the āsava flows from these feet — bhakti is the wine pressed out of Kṛṣṇa's own pādāravinda.
  • karṇa - puṭaiḥ — with the cups of the ears
    Karṇa (ear) + puṭa (cup, fold). The ear is rendered a drinking vessel. Gauḍīya śravaṇa-bhakti rests on this image — Hari-kathā is taken in not as information but as drink.
  • asmṛti — forgetfulness
    A (not) + smṛti (remembrance). The soul's foundational disease — forgetting the Lord who made the body. The wine of Hari-kathā cures precisely this forgetting; smaraṇa is the antidote and the medicine.
  • deha - kṛt — maker of the body
    Deha (body) + kṛt (maker). Bhagavān is named here as the very architect of the embodiment the soul has come to mistake for itself. The verse argues that to forget the deha-kṛt is the original error; remembering Him is the original cure.
  • prabho — O master
    Vocative of prabhu. The kings address Kṛṣṇa not as kinsman now but as Lord — the conversation has shifted register, and the address tracks the shift.
[Lord Kṛṣṇa’s relatives said:] O master, how can misfortune arise for those who have even once freely drunk the nectar coming from Your lotus feet? This intoxicating liquor pours into the drinking cups of their ears, having flowed from the minds of great devotees through their mouths. It destroys the embodied souls’ forgetfulness of the creator of their bodily existence.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
[Lord Kṛṣṇa's relatives said:] O master, how can misfortune arise for those who have even once freely drunk the nectar coming from Your lotus feet? This intoxicating liquor pours into the drinking cups of their ears, having flowed from the minds of great devotees through their mouths. It destroys the embodied souls' forgetfulness of the creator of their bodily existence.
Commentary

What can be inauspicious for those with material bodies who drink through their ears the nectar of your lotus feet, which flows from the minds of the great devotees (mahamanastah) out through their mouths, and destroyed that ignorance which produced our bodies?

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

From where or from what cause can there be inauspiciousness for those you hear about you? At all times, everywhere, they have auspiciousness. Some profusely (alam) drink (hear about with pleasure) the sweetness (āsavam) of your lotus feet—the excellence of your pastimes, qualities and form with devotion using their ears. “How do they attain what is most rare?” That sweetness as flowed from the minds of great devotees through their mouths. It has appeared by means of the mouth with extreme fullness. The word āsavam indicates that topics are naturally sweet. By its intoxicating effect it makes one forget all suffering. The destruction of inauspiciousness is shown by kaimutya. It is proper to remember the creator of the body by directly seeing it. These topics destroy forgetfulness of you, the body’s creator. Or for those who have bodies which give various sufferings at all times, these topics destroy forgetfulness which causes production of bodies (deha-kṛt). Those topics cause continual remembrance of the Lord. This is possible because of your power. O Lord endowed with all ability (prabho)! If there is no inauspiciousness for others who hear accidentally, now by your mercy we certainly have no inauspiciousness because we hear about you while you personally distribute that sweetness. We see you directly and you ask us questions. Since the Pāṇḍavas’ previous unlimited inauspiciousness was destroyed, how could it again appear? Thus they always experienced auspiciousness.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)
Related verses
'How can misfortune arise for those who have drunk the nectar of Your feet? It destroys forgetfulness of the creator of bodily existence.' The remedy for forgetfulness is the nectar passed mouth-to-ear.
Reflection Questions
  • What nectar from a devotee's mouth has poured into my ear recently?
  • What forgetfulness has it dissolved?

Words about Kṛṣṇa, flowing from the mouths of great devotees, enter the ears as a wine pours into a cup — and the cup is the soul itself. Once drunk, the wine does not produce forgetfulness but burns away the older drunkenness of forgetting who made this body in the first place. Material liquor numbs; Hari-kathā wakes.

Parīkṣit at the Ganges

Cursed to die in seven days, King Parīkṣit took no other shelter than this drink. Seated on the bank of the Gaṅgā, he opened the cups of his ears to Śukadeva's mouth and drank Bhāgavatam continuously.

The verse here describes precisely what was happening to him: the āsavam of Kṛṣṇa's caraṇāmbuja, poured from mahat-manastaḥ through Śukadeva's mukha, was destroying his deha-asmṛti — the embodied soul's forgetfulness — even as the snake's poison crept toward him. Outside, death; inside, only Kṛṣṇa.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.4

↗
हि त्वात्मधामविधुतात्मकृतत्र्यवस्था- मानन्दसम्प्लवमखण्डमकुण्ठबोधम् । कालोपसृष्टनिगमावन आत्तयोग- मायाकृतिं परमहंसगतिं नता: स्म ॥ ४ ॥
hi tvātma dhāma-vidhutātma-kṛta-try-avasthām
[hi tvaatma dhaama-vidhutaatma-krita-try-avasthaam]
ānanda-samplavam akhaṇḍam akuṇṭha-bodham
[aananda-samplavam akhandam akuntha-bodham]
kālopasṛṣṭa-nigamāvana ātta-yoga-
[kaalopasrishta-nigamaavana aatta-yoga-]
māyākṛtiṁ paramahaṁsa-gatiṁ natāḥ sma
[maayaakritim paramahamsa-gatim nataah sma]
hi — indeed tvā — to You ātma — of Your personal form dhāma — by the illumination vidhuta — dispelled ātma — by material consciousness kṛta — created tri — three avasthām — the material conditions ānanda — in ecstasy samplavam — (within whom is) the total immersion akhaṇḍam — unlimited akuṇṭha — unrestricted bodham — whose knowledge kāla — by time upasṛṣṭa — endangered nigama — of the Vedas avane — for the protection ātta — having assumed yoga - māyā — by Your divine power of illusion ākṛtim — this form parama - haṁsa — of perfect saints gatim — the goal natāḥ sma — (we) have bowed down .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
hi tvātma dhāma-vidhutātma-kṛta-try-avasthām
hi
indeed
tvā
to You
ātma
of Your personal form
dhāma
by the illumination
vidhuta
dispelled
ātma
by material consciousness
kṛta
created
tri
three
avasthām
the material conditions
ānanda-samplavam akhaṇḍam akuṇṭha-bodham
ānanda
in ecstasy
samplavam
(within whom is) the total immersion
akhaṇḍam
unlimited
akuṇṭha
unrestricted
bodham
whose knowledge
kālopasṛṣṭa-nigamāvana ātta-yoga-
kāla
by time
upasṛṣṭa
endangered
nigama
of the Vedas
avane
for the protection
ātta
having assumed
yoga - māyā
by Your divine power of illusion
māyākṛtiṁ paramahaṁsa-gatiṁ natāḥ sma
ākṛtim
this form
parama - haṁsa
of perfect saints
gatim
the goal
natāḥ sma
(we) have bowed down .
  • yoga - māyā — internal divine potency
    Yoga (uniting) + māyā (potency). Gauḍīya doctrine sharply distinguishes Yoga-māyā (Kṛṣṇa's internal cit-śakti, which arranges līlā) from Mahā-māyā (the external, illusioning potency). The kings rightly attribute Kṛṣṇa's human form to the former — He has not been forced into a body; He has freely come.
  • ātma - dhāma — the splendor of His own person
    Ātma (self, person) + dhāma (abode, splendor). The verse does not say impersonal brahman dispels avidyā — it says Kṛṣṇa's personal radiance does. Gauḍīya personalism reads the line strictly: the dispelling light is the form itself.
  • nigama — the Vedas
    Nigama — the revealed Vedic literature. Kṛṣṇa's descent is here justified as nigama-avane (Veda-protection) — He has come because time was eroding revelation. The Gauḍīya Bhāgavata-paramparā treats this verse as proof that Kṛṣṇa's appearance is itself a śruti-rescue mission.
  • parama - haṁsa — supremely realized soul
    Parama (supreme) + haṁsa (swan — said to separate milk from water). The paramahaṁsa is the topmost class of devotee in Gauḍīya classification. The verse names Kṛṣṇa as their gati — even the highest realized soul has Him as final destination, not impersonal merging.
  • ānanda — bliss
    One member of the sat-cit-ānanda triad. The verse says Kṛṣṇa's devotees are in ānanda-samplavam — total immersion in bliss. Gauḍīya rasa-theology insists this ānanda is not a state of absence (śūnya) but the positive sweetness of relationship with Bhagavān.
  • ākṛtim — form
    From √kṛ — that which is fashioned. Pairing ākṛti with Yoga-māyā emphasizes: this form is real, deliberate, internally fashioned by Kṛṣṇa Himself — not an illusion projected on a formless absolute. The line is a Gauḍīya proof-text against Māyāvāda.
The radiance of Your personal form dispels the threefold effects of material consciousness, and by Your grace we become immersed in total happiness. Your knowledge is indivisible and unrestricted. By Your Yoga-māyā potency You have assumed this human form for protecting the Vedas, which had been threatened by time. We bow down to You, the final destination of perfect saints.

Simply by the effulgent light emanating from the beautiful form of Lord Kṛṣṇa, one’s intelligence is purified of all material contamination, and thus the soul’s various entanglements in the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance are dispelled. “How then,” the Lord’s relatives imply, “can we ever suffer misfortune? We are always immersed in absolute happiness.” This is their answer to His inquiry about their welfare.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The radiance of Your personal form dispels the threefold effects of material consciousness, and by Your grace we become immersed in total happiness. Your knowledge is indivisible and unrestricted. By Your Yogamāyā potency You have assumed this human form for protecting the Vedas, which had been threatened by time. We bow down to You, the final destination of perfect saints.
Commentary

Certainly ( hi) we have surrendered to you (tva ), who destroys the jivas’ three modes of nature composed of ignorance, by the manifestation of your spiritual form. How could there be anything inauspicious for us ? You cause our submersion in bliss. In other words, more than destroying ignorance, we are submerged in bliss just by seeing you. You have knowledge (bodham) completely unaffected by time or other elements. Thus you know the inclination of our hearts, our complete surrender to you. You have accepted (atta) pastimes (krti) of destroying the demons and protecting the devotees by yogamaya, for the purpose of maintaining (avana) the rules outlined in the Vedas (nigama) which are destroyed by time. In other words, you give happiness to everyone.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Ignoring all else we surrender to you. You have revealed your form by your yoga-māyā yan martya-līlaupayikaṁ sva-yoga- māyā-balaṁ darśayatā gṛhītam Kṛṣṇa possesses that form suitable for human pastimes to show the full capacity of his yoga-māyā. SB 3.2.12 This is the supreme form, appearing like an ordinary human being, which cannot be understood by others. This form is understood by the paramahaṁsas. Another meaning can be understood by taking the phrase ātma-dhāma to mean pure svarūpa. This is modified by the four phrases. Thus the meaning is “We surrender to you, manifested by your yoga-māyā for protecting the Vedas, while giving up (hitvā) knowledge of your pure svarūpa which purifies people of the three states of the self, which creates bliss and continuous, unrestricted knowledge, and which is the goal of the paramahaṁsas.” Sma indicates accomplishment. Another version has smaḥ (we are). Then the meaning is “We worship you with determination at all times.” Why? You are to be worshipped by paramahaṁsas. The reason is that in order to protect the Vedas destroyed by time, you possess a form which displays all pastimes of your svarūpa -śakti (ātta-yoga-māyā) or you manifest (ātta) a form of cit-śakti whose nature is yoga-māyā. Or we surrender to you, endowed with a form of cit-śakti, called yoga-māyā, after you gave up Goloka, your eternal abode of pastimes (ātma-dhāma), which destroys material consciousness, which has continuous bliss and knowledge, and which is realized by paramahaṁsas.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We surrender to you alone, ignoring all else. You are the goal of liberated souls (paramahaṁsa-gatim). This means you are rarely attained. The reason is given. By your yoga-māyā potency you have assumed this human form for protecting the Vedas, which had been threatened by time. Another meaning can be understood by taking the phrase ātma-dhāma to mean pure svarūpa. This is modified by the four phrases. We surrender to you, having a pure form. Thus the meaning is “We surrender to you, manifested by your yoga-māyā for protecting the Vedas, while giving up (hitvā) knowledge of your pure svarūpa which purifies people of the three states of the self, which creates bliss and continuous, unrestricted knowledge, and which is the goal of the paramahaṁsas.” Sma indicates accomplishment. Another version has smaḥ (we are). Then the meaning is “We worship you with determination at all times.” Why? You are to be worshipped by paramahaṁsas. The reason is that in order to protect the Vedas destroyed by time, you possess forms like Matsya by the pḷay of your cit-śakti (ātta-yoga-māyā). You are concentrated sweetness, since you are the seed of many sweet avatāras. Or you manifest (ātta) a human form endowed with mercy or various pastimes (māyā) and power (yoga). Or we who perform acts stated in the Vedas, attacked by time (kālopaspṛṣṭa-nigamāḥ) surrender to you who spread (ātta) activities (kṛti), mercy (māyā) and power (yoga) in the forest (vane) of Vṛndāvana.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)
Related verses
Concepts
Yoga
Your form's radiance dispels the threefold material consciousness; by Your grace we become immersed in total happiness. You assumed this human form to protect the Vedas. The Lord descends because dharma needs protection.
Reflection Questions
  • What dharma in me needs protecting that only the Lord's intervention can secure?
  • How does His form-radiance dispel modes I cannot dispel by effort?

When the sun rises, the threefold darkness of the room — that of the wall, of the floor, of the ceiling — is dispelled by a single light. So the radiance (ātma-dhāma) of Kṛṣṇa's personal form dispels the three states of waking, dream, and deep sleep at once. He has not assumed this human ākṛti out of necessity but by Yoga-māyā, the way the sun chooses to come close to one window so a particular family may worship Him.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.5

↗
श्रीऋषिरुवाच इत्युत्तम:श्लोकशिखामणिं जने- ष्वभिष्टुवत्स्वन्धककौरवस्‍त्रिय: । समेत्य गोविन्दकथा मिथोऽगृणं- स्‍त्रिलोकगीता: श‍ृणु वर्णयामि ते ॥ ५ ॥
śrī-ṛṣir uvāca
[shree-rishir uvaacha]
ity uttamaḥ-śloka-śikhā-maṇiṁ janeṣv
[ity uttamah-shloka-shikhaa-manim janeshv]
abhiṣṭuvatsv andhaka-kaurava-striyaḥ
[abhishtuvatsv andhaka-kaurava-striyah]
sametya govinda-kathā mitho ’gṛnaṁs
[sametya govinda-kathaa mitho ’grinams]
tri-loka-gītāḥ śṛṇu varṇayāmi te
[tri-loka-geetaah shrinu varnayaami te]
śrī - ṛṣiḥ uvāca — the great sage, Śukadeva, said iti — thus uttamaḥ - śloka — of great personalities who are glorified in choice poetry śikhā - maṇim — the crest jewel (Lord Kṛṣṇa) janeṣu — His devotees abhiṣṭuvatsu — while they were glorifying andhaka - kaurava — of the Andhaka and Kaurava clans striyaḥ — the women sametya — meeting govinda - kathāḥ — topics of Lord Govinda mithaḥ — among one another agṛṇan — spoke tri — three loka — in the worlds gītāḥ — sung śṛṇu — please hear varṇayāmi — I will describe te — to you (Parīkṣit Mahārāja) .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-ṛṣir uvāca
śrī - ṛṣiḥ uvāca
the great sage, Śukadeva, said
ity uttamaḥ-śloka-śikhā-maṇiṁ janeṣv
iti
thus
uttamaḥ - śloka
of great personalities who are glorified in choice poetry
śikhā - maṇim
the crest jewel (Lord Kṛṣṇa)
janeṣu
His devotees
abhiṣṭuvatsv andhaka-kaurava-striyaḥ
abhiṣṭuvatsu
while they were glorifying
andhaka - kaurava
of the Andhaka and Kaurava clans
striyaḥ
the women
sametya govinda-kathā mitho ’gṛnaṁs
sametya
meeting
govinda - kathāḥ
topics of Lord Govinda
mithaḥ
among one another
tri-loka-gītāḥ śṛṇu varṇayāmi te
agṛṇan
spoke
tri
three
loka
in the worlds
gītāḥ
sung
śṛṇu
please hear
varṇayāmi
I will describe
te
to you (Parīkṣit Mahārāja) .
  • govinda - kathāḥ — topics of Govinda
    Govinda (one who pleases the cows / Earth / senses) + kathā (narrative). The Gauḍīya emblem of the highest conversation. Note Śuka chooses the name Govinda — not Vāsudeva, not Janārdana — locking the inner chamber's mood to Vraja even in Hastināpura.
  • uttamaḥ - śloka — He whose verses are of the highest order
    Uttama (highest) + śloka (verse, fame). A title for Kṛṣṇa that the Bhāgavatam itself frequently uses; the women's gathering will, in effect, compose fresh uttama-ślokas in the chapters that follow.
  • śikhā - maṇim — crest-jewel
    Śikhā (crest) + maṇi (jewel). The image places Kṛṣṇa as the maṇi mounted at the top of the assembly of all glorified personalities — not first among equals but the apex of the diadem.
  • striyaḥ — the women
    Strī — the female-headed gathering. The Bhāgavatam does not relegate this scene to anecdote; an entire chapter is devoted to the women's kathā. Gauḍīya tradition reads this as honoring the strī-bhakta's particular gift: storytelling as devotional offering.
  • tri - loka - gītāḥ — sung throughout the three worlds
    Tri (three) + loka (worlds) + gītāḥ (sung). The stories about to be told are not domestic gossip — they are already being sung by gandharvas, by sages, by every devotee across the three worlds. The inner chamber happens to be one more performance of a universal song.
The great sage Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: As Yudhiṣṭhira and the others were thus praising Lord Kṛṣṇa, the crest jewel of all sublimely glorified personalities, the women of the Andhaka and Kaurava clans met with one another and began discussing topics about Govinda that are sung throughout the three worlds. Please listen as I relate these to you.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The great sage Śukadeva Gosvāmī said: As Yudhiṣṭhira and the others were thus praising Lord Kṛṣṇa, the crest jewel of all sublimely glorified personalities, the women of the Andhaka and Kaurava clans met with one another and began discussing topics about Govinda that are sung throughout the three worlds. Please listen as I relate these to you.
Commentary

I now describe to you those topics which they discussed, which are sung throughout the three worlds.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Just as Yudhiṣṭhira and his people praised Kṛṣṇa other people also praised him. Similarly the wives of the Yādavas and Kauravas gathered together and spoke about Kṛṣṇa. I will tell to you these words sung in the three worlds, words filled with mercy. Please listen with complete faith. In the various topics discussed by the women, Śukadeva describes the conversations of Rukmiṇī and other queens with Draupadī about their marriages to Kṛṣṇa, since Śukadeva had great respect for Draupadī because of her special bhāva and because she herself was the chief of those possessing great sweetness.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Though Yudhiṣṭḥira was superior to all others by being dear to the Lord, he is mentioned along with the other kings, since he was very modest because of his great bhakti. They had praised intently (abhiṣṭuvatsu) Kṛṣṇa, the crest jewel of persons like Yudhiṣṭhira, who had pure fame. As they did this, the enthusiasm of the women increased. Thus the wives of the Andhakas, Yadus, Kauravas, and Yudhiṣṭhira gathered together and spoke. Though there were other women, these were the chief ones. Among them those who were involved in questions and answers, Draupadī and the queens of Kṛṣna were most prominent. They discussed topics of king of Gokula (govinda), or he who protects the earth, appearing there to manifest unlimited qualities. This suggests that the topics were very sweet since the subject of marriage was most prominent among them. Thus the topics are sung in the three worlds. I will describe in detail those topics to you, dear to Govinda. Listen with great faith. Śukadeva became blissful because of a special bhāva which developed because of the topics of the Lord’s marriages.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomSeva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)
Related verses
While Yudhiṣṭhira praised Kṛṣṇa, the women of the Andhaka and Kaurava clans met and discussed Govinda's pastimes. Women's circles tell the Lord's stories too; this transmission is its own lineage.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose circles in my life tell stories about the Lord, and am I part of them?
  • What different angles on Kṛṣṇa do women's voices open?

While the men sit in the front hall and speak philosophy of Kṛṣṇa, the women of the Andhaka and Kuru households gather in the inner chambers and tell one another the actual stories. Each conversation is rasa in a different register — the men's is jñāna-mixed devotion, the women's is unadorned narrative bhakti, the gold dust of Govinda-kathā passed between hands.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.6-7

↗
श्रीद्रौपद्युवाच हे वैदर्भ्यच्युतो भद्रे हे जाम्बवति कौशले । हे सत्यभामे कालिन्दि शैब्ये रोहिणि लक्ष्मणे ॥ ६ ॥ हे कृष्णपत्न्‍य एतन्नो ब्रूते वो भगवान् स्वयम् । उपयेमे यथा लोकमनुकुर्वन् स्वमायया ॥ ७ ॥
śrī-draupady uvāca
[shree-draupady uvaacha]
he vaidarbhy acyuto bhadre
[he vaidarbhy achyuto bhadre]
he jāmbavati kauśale
[he jaambavati kaushale]
he satyabhāme kālindi
[he satyabhaame kaalindi]
śaibye rohiṇi lakṣmaṇe
[shaibye rohini lakshmane]
he kṛṣṇa-patnya etan no
[he krishna-patnya etan no]
brūte vo bhagavān svayam
[broote vo bhagavaan svayam]
upayeme yathā lokam
[upayeme yathaa lokam]
anukurvan sva-māyayā
[anukurvan sva-maayayaa]
śrī - draupadī uvāca — Śrī Draupadī said he vaidarbhi — O daughter of Vaidarbha (Rukmiṇī) acyutaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa bhadre — O Bhadrā he jāmbavati — O daughter of Jāmbavān kauśale — O Nāgnajitī he satyabhāme — O Satyabhāmā kālindi — O Kālindī śaibye — O Mitravindā rohiṇi — O Rohiṇī (one of the sixteen thousand queens married after the killing of Narakāsura) lakṣmaṇe — O Lakṣmaṇā he kṛṣṇa - patnyaḥ — O (other) wives of Kṛṣṇa etat — this naḥ — to us brūte — please speak vaḥ — you bhagavān — the Supreme Lord svayam — Himself upayeme — married yathā — how lokam — ordinary society anukurvan — imitating sva - māyayā — by His own mystic power .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-draupady uvāca
śrī - draupadī uvāca
Śrī Draupadī said
he vaidarbhy acyuto bhadre
he vaidarbhi
O daughter of Vaidarbha (Rukmiṇī)
acyutaḥ
Lord Kṛṣṇa
bhadre
O Bhadrā
he jāmbavati kauśale
he jāmbavati
O daughter of Jāmbavān
kauśale
O Nāgnajitī
he satyabhāme kālindi
he satyabhāme
O Satyabhāmā
kālindi
O Kālindī
śaibye rohiṇi lakṣmaṇe
śaibye
O Mitravindā
rohiṇi
O Rohiṇī (one of the sixteen thousand queens married after the killing of Narakāsura)
lakṣmaṇe
O Lakṣmaṇā
he kṛṣṇa-patnya etan no
he kṛṣṇa - patnyaḥ
O (other) wives of Kṛṣṇa
etat
this
naḥ
to us
brūte vo bhagavān svayam
brūte
please speak
vaḥ
you
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
svayam
Himself
upayeme yathā lokam
upayeme
married
yathā
how
lokam
ordinary society
anukurvan sva-māyayā
anukurvan
imitating
sva - māyayā
by His own mystic power .
  • acyutaḥ — the infallible one
    A (not) + cyuta (fallen). Draupadī addresses Kṛṣṇa by the name He earned by never letting His devotees fall — including her own famous rescue in the Kuru assembly. The vocative resonance is personal.
  • he kṛṣṇa - patnyaḥ — O wives of Kṛṣṇa
    Patnī — co-yajña-partner, not merely 'wife'. The plural sets the chapter's frame: each patnī performs her own yajña of relationship with the same Lord, and the chapter is a recording of those simultaneous yajñas.
  • upayeme — He married
    Perfect tense of upa + √yam — to take in marriage. Draupadī's verb places agency on Kṛṣṇa: He married each of them. The queens will narrate how — but the deeper truth, that He chose them, is fixed at the outset.
  • lokam anukurvan — imitating ordinary society
    Loka (world) + anu (after) + √kṛ (do). Gauḍīya commentators take this as load-bearing: Kṛṣṇa's marriages are not bound by karma; they are imitations of human custom undertaken so the līlā can be visible. The svayaṁvaras, the dowries, the elopements — all are anukaraṇa, divine mimicry.
  • sva - māyayā — by His own mystic power
    Sva (own) + māyā (potency). The māyā here is His own — i.e. Yoga-māyā, not Mahā-māyā. The Lord's marriages are arranged by His internal potency to display the full spectrum of conjugal relationship for the world's instruction.
Śrī Draupadī said: O Vaidarbhī, Bhadrā and Jāmbavatī, O Kauśalā, Satyabhāmā and Kālindī, O Śaibyā, Rohiṇī, Lakṣmaṇā and other wives of Lord Kṛṣṇa, please tell me how the Supreme Lord Acyuta, imitating the ways of this world by His mystic power, came to marry each of you.

The Rohiṇī addressed here by Draupadī is not Lord Balarāma’s mother but another Rohiṇī, the foremost of the sixteen thousand princesses Lord Kṛṣṇa rescued from the prison of Bhaumāsura. Draupadī turns to her as the representative of all sixteen thousand, and as a virtual equal to Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s eight chief queens.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Draupadī said: O Vaidarbhī, Bhadrā and Jāmbavatī, O Kauśalā, Satyabhāmā and Kālindī, O Śaibyā, Rohiṇī, Lakṣmaṇā and other wives of Lord Kṛṣṇa, please tell me how the Supreme Lord Acyuta, imitating the ways of this world by His mystic power, came to marry each of you.
Commentary

Kausala here refers to Nagnajiti. O queens, please tell us in truth, how Krsna married you. Or how he married you without cheating. (seems anamaya is used instead of svamayaya in some texts.)

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Drauāpadī asked with great curiosity about the marriages because of her friendship with the queens. Kṛṣṇa is called Acyuta because he never left the houses of any of them. Though I know you queens of the Lord are eternally so because you are forms of Lakṣmī, please describe how he married you, while imitating ordinary behavior giving mercy (māyā) to all his devotees in his prakaṭa pastimes. She shows reverence and curiosity. Though it was possible to address the queens in order of seniority, according to when they were married, she calls to them according to the sitting arrangement at that time. She also adds the word he in addressing the three chief queens with respect. Rohiṇī was the chief among the sixteen thousand one hundred queens. She is mentioned with the chief eight since she was equal to them. In answering her, the queens speak in order of the time of their marriages. Jāmbavatī was married to Kṛṣṇa before Satyabhāmā but when they speak Satyabhāmā speaks first because of her special love for the Lord. Bhadrā and Mitravindā are reversed when speaking verses in Śrīdhara Svāmī’s version. This is an error of the copier since it produces a contradiction to the previous descriptions of the marriage given in Chapter 58. In his commentary on Lakṣṁaṇā’s words on verse 17, Bhadrā’s name should replace Mitravindā’s.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
Concepts
Satya
Draupadī asked each queen — Rukmiṇī, Bhadrā, Jāmbavatī, Kauśalā, Satyabhāmā, Kālindī, Śaibyā, Rohiṇī, Lakṣmaṇā — to share how Kṛṣṇa came to marry her. Asking for the love-story is itself an act of devotion.
Reflection Questions
  • Whose story of meeting the Lord could I ask to hear?
  • What does asking honor about the other person's path?

Draupadī's question is the listener's question. She names each queen one by one, knowing each has a different door by which she entered Kṛṣṇa's house — one was carried away from a wedding, one offered with a jewel, one earned through tapas, one given freely by a father, one chosen at a svayaṁvara. Like a teacher who asks every student to share how they arrived at the school, she invites the full bouquet of rasas.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.8

↗
श्रीरुक्‍मिण्युवाच चैद्याय मार्पयितुमुद्यतकार्मुकेषु राजस्वजेयभटशेखरिताङ्‍‍घ्रिरेणु: । निन्ये मृगेन्द्र इव भागमजावियूथात् तच्छ्रीनिकेतचरणोऽस्तु ममार्चनाय ॥ ८ ॥
śrī-rukmiṇy uvāca
[shree-rukminy uvaacha]
caidyāya mārpayitum udyata-kārmukeṣu
[chaidyaaya maarpayitum udyata-kaarmukeshu]
rājasv ajeya-bhaṭa-śekharitāṅghri-reṇuḥ
[raajasv ajeya-bhata-shekharitaanghri-renuh]
ninye mṛgendra iva bhāgam ajāvi-yūthāt
[ninye mrigendra iva bhaagam ajaavi-yoothaat]
tac-chrī-niketa-caraṇo ’stu mamārcanāya
[tach-chree-niketa-charano ’stu mamaarchanaaya]
śrī - rukmiṇī uvāca — Śrī Rukmiṇī said caidyāya — to Śiśupāla mā — me arpayitum — in order to offer udyata — holding at the ready kārmukeṣu — whose bows rājasu — when the kings ajeya — invincible bhaṭa — of soldiers śekharita — placed upon the heads aṅghri — of whose feet reṇuḥ — the dust ninye — He took away mṛgendraḥ — a lion iva — as if bhāgam — his share aja — of goats avi — and sheep yūthāt — from a group tat — of Him śrī — of the supreme goddess of fortune niketa — who is the abode caraṇaḥ — the feet astu — may be mama — my arcanāya — for the worship .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-rukmiṇy uvāca
śrī - rukmiṇī uvāca
Śrī Rukmiṇī said
caidyāya
to Śiśupāla
caidyāya mārpayitum udyata-kārmukeṣu
mā
me
arpayitum
in order to offer
udyata
holding at the ready
kārmukeṣu
whose bows
rājasv ajeya-bhaṭa-śekharitāṅghri-reṇuḥ
rājasu
when the kings
ajeya
invincible
bhaṭa
of soldiers
śekharita
placed upon the heads
aṅghri
of whose feet
reṇuḥ
the dust
ninye mṛgendra iva bhāgam ajāvi-yūthāt
ninye
He took away
mṛgendraḥ
a lion
iva
as if
bhāgam
his share
aja
of goats
avi
and sheep
yūthāt
from a group
tac-chrī-niketa-caraṇo ’stu mamārcanāya
tat
of Him
śrī
of the supreme goddess of fortune
niketa
who is the abode
caraṇaḥ
the feet
astu
may be
mama
my
arcanāya
for the worship .
  • mṛgendraḥ — lion (lord of beasts)
    Mṛga (beast) + indra (lord). Rukmiṇī's chosen simile for her own marriage: not abduction by a thief, but rescue by a lion from a pen of cowards. The image will be echoed by Mitravindā (verse 12: dvipa-ariḥ) and by Śukadeva narrating Lakṣmaṇā's wedding (verse 33: mṛga-rāṭ).
  • caraṇaḥ — the feet
    Singular caraṇa-stem. Rukmiṇī ends the verse not by celebrating her rescue but by asking that those feet remain her arcana-object. Gauḍīya bhakti reads the closing line as the actual content of the marriage: not the act of being taken, but the perpetual seva-relationship that began with it.
  • śrī - niketa — the abode of the goddess of fortune
    Śrī (Lakṣmī, fortune) + niketa (dwelling). Kṛṣṇa is the abode in whom Śrī dwells — a Vaiṣṇava formula. Rukmiṇī, herself an expansion of Śrī, is acknowledging that her own ultimate ground is in Kṛṣṇa's feet, where Śrī rests.
  • arcanāya — for worship
    Arcana — formal ritual worship. The dative case (arcanāya) shows purpose: 'so that I may worship'. Rukmiṇī asks for the eternal posture of arcana-bhakti at His feet, not merely for the status of queen.
  • ajeya - bhaṭa - śekharita - aṅghri - reṇuḥ — (He) on whose feet the dust of invincible warriors' heads has come to rest
    Contiguous compound. Where invincible warriors have placed their heads, Kṛṣṇa's feet have rested — the dust on His soles is itself the dust of conquered helmets. The poetic image inverts the usual conqueror-conquered relationship and frames every battle as a śaraṇāgati toward Him.
Śrī Rukmiṇī said: When all the kings held their bows at the ready to assure that I would be presented to Śiśupāla, He who puts the dust of His feet on the heads of invincible warriors took me from their midst, as a lion forcibly takes his prey from the midst of goats and sheep. May I always be allowed to worship those feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the abode of Goddess Śrī.

Lord Kṛṣṇa’s pastime of kidnapping Rukmiṇī is narrated in detail in Chapters Fifty-two through Fifty-four of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam’s Tenth Canto.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Rukmiṇī said: When all the kings held their bows at the ready to assure that I would be presented to Śiśupāla, He who puts the dust of His feet on the heads of invincible warriors took me from their midst, as a lion forcibly takes his prey from the midst of goats and sheep. May I always be allowed to worship those feet of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the abode of Goddess Śrī.
Commentary

Though the kings such as Jarasandha were standing with bows ready to shoot, in order to offer me to Sisupala, Krsna, whose foot dust is held by heads of the invincible warriors, took me away, as a lion takes away his share from a herd of goats or sheep. May his feet which are the abode of Laksmi, be the goal of my worship.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I offer respects to the consorts of Kṛṣṇa, whose bhāvas are sometimes understood and sometimes hard to understand. I can only proceed to explain the meaning of their words by his mercy. Kṛṣṇa put the dust of his feet upon the heads of the invincible kings. Or, Kṛṣṇa put his foot dust on their heads to show his invincibility. He accepted me as his own very easily since he was unconquerable. An example is given to show his great prowess. He was like lion taking his share from the goats and sheep. Giving the details, to show his great compassion, she says that she was taken in that way, though she was unqualified. “You are Lakṣmī full of all wealth. Should you not be taken by the Lord?” His feet are the abode of Lakṣmī. By his mercy I should be the same. Let his feet be there as the object of my worship. She prays in this way, indicating that she is not qualified to be his servant. How do I then deserve to be his wife? She prays only to be his servant, serving his lotus feet. Or he whose feet are the abode of Lakṣmī accepted me as his share. She speaks out of great devotion. The grammatical structure is similar to SB 11.5.34

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I offer respects to the consorts of Kṛṣṇa, whose bhāvas are sometimes understood and sometimes hard to understand. I can only proceed to explain the meaning of their words by his mercy. He who puts the dust of his feet on the heads of invincible warriors of the kings took me to Dvārakā or took me away. This was done without effort. These warriors were unconquerable. This shows Kṛṣṇa’s great courage. An example is given. The lion takes his share from a group of goats or sheep. He took me away. This indicates the marriage but it is not mentioned, out of her shyness or modesty. Though it was not proper for him to take her in this way, she could not contain her joy, and thus related the uncommon incident. Taking her away was his great mercy. “You are his eternal consort Lakṣmī, goddess of all wealth, situated on his chest eternally. Why are you not there?” One of his feet is the shelter of Lakṣmī, because of its wealth of softness or variety of beauty. Or one foot contains all wealth. By its mercy, I am a queen. May his foot be for my worship. May I worship the foot. It is not my possession. She prays in this way, indicating that she is not qualified to be his servant. How do I then deserve to be his wife? She prays only to be his servant, serving his lotus feet. She speaks out of great devotion. Or he whose feet are the abode of Lakṣmī accepted me as his share and took me away. The grammatical structure is similar to SB 11.5.34

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)
Related verses
Rukmiṇī said Kṛṣṇa took her like a lion taking prey from sheep, before she could be given to Śiśupāla. May I always worship those feet of the Lord, abode of Lakṣmī. The story ends in continuing prayer.
Reflection Questions
  • How does my own 'how I met the Lord' story end — and is the ending still going?
  • What ongoing prayer extends from a past meeting?

A lion does not knock at the door of the pen; he steps among the goats and sheep, takes his share, and walks out unhurried. So Kṛṣṇa entered the courtyard of kings who had their bows trained on Him, picked Rukmiṇī up before Śiśupāla's eyes, and left. The verse calls it rākṣasa-vivāha by form — but the lion's calm is mādhurya, not violence.

The letter and the abduction

In SB 10.52, the young Rukmiṇī, refused her chosen Lord by her brother Rukmī, wrote Kṛṣṇa a brāhmaṇa-borne letter offering her life as His. She named the day, the temple of Ambikā outside the city, the moment when she would emerge after worship.

Kṛṣṇa came on the appointed dawn, lifted her into His chariot before all the assembled kings (Jarāsandha, Śālva, Śiśupāla), defeated their armies, shaved Rukmī's head and beard, and brought her to Dvārakā. The verse here is Rukmiṇī's own retelling — and she chooses the image of the mṛgendraḥ, the lion-among-deer, not the abductor. Her bhakti reads the violence as protection.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.9

↗
श्रीसत्यभामोवाच यो मे सनाभिवधतप्तहृदा ततेन लिप्ताभिशापमपमार्ष्टुमुपाजहार । जित्वर्क्षराजमथ रत्नमदात् स तेन भीत: पितादिशत मां प्रभवेऽपि दत्ताम् ॥ ९ ॥
śrī-satyabhāmovāca
[shree-satyabhaamovaacha]
yo me sanābhi-vadha-tapta-hṛdā tatena
[yo me sanaabhi-vadha-tapta-hridaa tatena]
liptābhiśāpam apamārṣṭum upājahāra
[liptaabhishaapam apamaarshtum upaajahaara]
jitvarkṣa-rājam atha ratnam adāt sa tena
[jitvarksha-raajam atha ratnam adaat sa tena]
bhītaḥ pitādiśata māṁ prabhave ’pi dattām
[bheetah pitaadishata maam prabhave ’pi dattaam]
śrī - satyabhāmā uvāca — Śrī Satyabhāmā said yaḥ — who me — my sanābhi — of my brother vadha — by the killing tapta — distressed hṛdā — whose heart tatena — by my father lipta — tainted abhiśāpam — with condemnation apamārṣṭum — to cleanse away upājahāra — He removed jitvā — after defeating ṛkṣa - rājam — the king of the bears, Jāmbavān atha — then ratnam — the jewel (Syamantaka) adāt — gave saḥ — He tena — because of this bhītaḥ — afraid pitā — my father adiśata — offered mām — me prabhave — to the Lord api — although dattām — already given .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-satyabhāmovāca
śrī - satyabhāmā uvāca
Śrī Satyabhāmā said
yaḥ
who
yo me sanābhi-vadha-tapta-hṛdā tatena
me
my
sanābhi
of my brother
vadha
by the killing
tapta
distressed
hṛdā
whose heart
tatena
by my father
liptābhiśāpam apamārṣṭum upājahāra
lipta
tainted
abhiśāpam
with condemnation
apamārṣṭum
to cleanse away
upājahāra
He removed
jitvarkṣa-rājam atha ratnam adāt sa tena
jitvā
after defeating
ṛkṣa - rājam
the king of the bears, Jāmbavān
atha
then
ratnam
the jewel (Syamantaka)
adāt
gave
saḥ
He
tena
because of this
bhītaḥ pitādiśata māṁ prabhave ’pi dattām
bhītaḥ
afraid
pitā
my father
adiśata
offered
mām
me
prabhave
to the Lord
api
although
dattām
already given .
  • abhiśāpam — condemnation, false accusation
    Abhi (toward) + śāpa (curse). The word names what Bhagavān bore for the sake of His own reputation among devotees: a public abhiśāpa. The act of going to the cave was nirmāṇa — repair — of His own kīrti, not for His sake but for the bhaktas' confidence.
  • ṛkṣa - rājam — king of the bears (Jāmbavān)
    Ṛkṣa (bear) + rāja (king). Jāmbavān is the same companion who served Lord Rāma — Kṛṣṇa is fighting His own previous-līlā servant. The fight ends when Jāmbavān recognizes the voice of his Rāma. The chapter will pick up this thread in the next verse from Jāmbavatī's side.
  • ratnam — the jewel (Syamantaka)
    Ratna — a precious stone. Kṛṣṇa returned it though He could have kept it. Gauḍīya commentators highlight that the gem was nothing to Him — He came for the kīrti, not for the gold.
  • adiśata — offered, gave directively
    Imperfect of ā + √diś. Satrājit had already promised Satyabhāmā elsewhere, but his fear made him 'redirect' her. The verb captures the abrupt re-allocation — and Kṛṣṇa accepts it without comment, knowing the underlying eligibility was always His.
  • dattām — (already) given
    Past participle feminine of √dā — given. The bracket is striking: she had already been given to others. Gauḍīya reading: Kṛṣṇa overrides the worldly contract because the inner contract — her bhakti — predates it. The Lord rearranges destinies when bhakti is in play.
Śrī Satyabhāmā said: My father, his heart tormented by his brother’s death, accused Kṛṣṇa of killing him. To remove the stain on His reputation, the Lord defeated the king of the bears and took back the Syamantaka jewel, which He then returned to my father. Fearing the consequences of his offense, my father offered me to the Lord, even though I had already been promised to others.

As described in Chapter Fifty-six of this canto, King Satrājit had already compromised himself by promising his daughter’s hand first to Akrūra and then again to a number of other suitors. But after the return of the Syamantaka jewel, he felt impelled by his shame to offer her to Lord Kṛṣṇa instead. According to Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī, the word prabhave (“unto the Lord”) answers any doubt as to the propriety of offering Kṛṣṇa a bride who had already been promised to others. It is perfectly proper to offer Him everything one owns, and improper to withhold anything from Him.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Satyabhāmā said: My father, his heart tormented by his brothers death, accused Kṛṣṇa of killing him. To remove the stain on His reputation, the Lord defeated the king of the bears and took back the Syamantaka jewel, which He then returned to my father. Fearing the consequences of his offense, my father offered me to the Lord, even though I had already been promised to others.
Commentary

In order to remove the ill fame, created by my father (tatena) who, aggrieved by the killing of his brother (sanabhi) prasena, accused Krsna of the deed, Krsna defeated Rksaraja and brought back the syamantaka jewel. Then he gave the jewel to my father. My father, fearing his offense, gave me, already promised to Akrura (dattam) to Krsna (prabhave).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

“That she was given because of fear is not proper.” He gave me, though given to others, to the Supreme Lord (prabhave). Actually everything belongs to him. It is proper to give everything to him. Giving to others is wrong. Or, my father gave me, promised but not given to others, to Kṛṣṇa out of fear of Kṛṣṇa so he could protect himself. Her father’s offense was removed. Because my father was insane with grief for his brother, he accused the Lord. This was not intentional. The Lord who took the jewel to remove the accusation, the Lord to whom my father gave me, gave the jewel back to my father. This verse has a grammatical construction similar to the last verse. Or, my father gave me to the Lord who took the jewel and gave it to my father. Like Rukmiṇī who prays to be a servant, most of the queens had prominent dāsya attitude, but Satyabhāmā had prominent sakhya because of strong feelings as a lover.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He gave me, though given to others, to the Supreme Lord (prabhave) who is capable of doing anything. Or he gave me to he who is my lord, being king of the Yadus (prabhave). Or he gave me to the lord of my life. For the very beginning she had love for him. Or “It was improper to give her since she had been given to others.” But he is the supreme Lord. It is proper to give me to him, since by doing so all faults are removed. Thus her father’s offense was annulled. Because my father was insane with grief for his dead brother, he accused the Lord. She does not pray like Rukminī, because of her strong prema or great shyness.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Satya
Satyabhāmā: my father, tormented by his brother's death, falsely accused Kṛṣṇa, who then defeated the bear king, recovered the jewel, and was offered me in restitution. Some marriages begin in injustice and end in reconciliation.
Reflection Questions
  • What relationship in my life began in misunderstanding and was reshaped by truth?
  • How does the Lord straighten out tangled stories?

A jeweller wrongly accused of theft does not argue; he walks into the cave, fights the bear-king for twenty-seven days, retrieves the stolen gem, and quietly places it on the accuser's table. Satrājit's accusation could have been answered with anger; Kṛṣṇa answered it with effort. Satyabhāmā, given in atonement, is the dākṣiṇa of His patience.

The Syamantaka jewel

In SB 10.56-57, the gem Syamantaka given to Satrājit by Sūrya produced eight bhāras of gold daily but only for a pure-hearted owner. Satrājit's brother Prasena wore it hunting, was killed by a lion, the lion in turn killed by Jāmbavān, and the jewel passed into the bear-king's cave.

Satrājit publicly accused Kṛṣṇa of the theft. To clear His name, Kṛṣṇa entered Ṛkṣa-bila, fought Jāmbavān twenty-seven days, won both Jāmbavatī and the gem, and returned the gem to Satrājit. Ashamed, the father offered his daughter Satyabhāmā along with the jewel. The verse compresses all of it. Gauḍīyas read the episode as Kṛṣṇa's tolerance — He could have struck Satrājit dead but instead bore the slander and walked into the bear's cave.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.10

↗
श्रीजाम्बवत्युवाच प्राज्ञाय देहकृदमुं निजनाथदैवं सीतापतिं त्रिनवहान्यमुनाभ्ययुध्यत् । ज्ञात्वा परीक्षित उपाहरदर्हणं मां पादौ प्रगृह्य मणिनाहममुष्य दासी ॥ १० ॥
śrī-jāmbavaty uvāca
[shree-jaambavaty uvaacha]
prājñāya deha-kṛd amuṁ nija-nātha-daivaṁ
[praajnaaya deha-krid amum nija-naatha-daivam]
sītā-patiṁ tri-navahāny amunābhyayudhyat
[seetaa-patim tri-navahaany amunaabhyayudhyat]
jñātvā parīkṣita upāharad arhaṇaṁ māṁ
[jnaatvaa pareekshita upaaharad arhanam maam]
pādau pragṛhya maṇināham amuṣya dāsī
[paadau pragrihya maninaaham amushya daasee]
śrī - jāmbavatī uvāca — Śrī Jāmbavatī said prājñāya — unaware deha — of my body kṛt — the maker (my father) amum — of Him nija — his own nātha — as the master daivam — and worshipable Deity sītā — of Goddess Sītā patim — the husband tri — three nava — times nine ahāni — for days amunā — with Him abhyayudhyat — he fought jñātvā — recognizing parīkṣitaḥ — awakened to proper understanding upāharat — he presented arhaṇam — as a respectful offering mām — me pādau — His feet pragṛhya — taking hold of maṇinā — with the jewel aham — I amuṣya — His dāsī — maidservant .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-jāmbavaty uvāca
śrī - jāmbavatī uvāca
Śrī Jāmbavatī said
prājñāya deha-kṛd amuṁ nija-nātha-daivaṁ
prājñāya
unaware
deha
of my body
kṛt
the maker (my father)
amum
of Him
nija
his own
nātha
as the master
daivam
and worshipable Deity
sītā-patiṁ tri-navahāny amunābhyayudhyat
sītā
of Goddess Sītā
patim
the husband
tri
three
nava
times nine
ahāni
for days
amunā
with Him
abhyayudhyat
he fought
jñātvā parīkṣita upāharad arhaṇaṁ māṁ
jñātvā
recognizing
parīkṣitaḥ
awakened to proper understanding
upāharat
he presented
arhaṇam
as a respectful offering
mām
me
pādau pragṛhya maṇināham amuṣya dāsī
pādau
His feet
pragṛhya
taking hold of
maṇinā
with the jewel
aham
I
amuṣya
His
dāsī
maidservant .
  • sītā - patim — the husband of Sītā
    Sītā + pati. Jāmbavatī identifies Kṛṣṇa by His Rāma-līlā title — a clear Bhāgavata acknowledgement of the avatāra-rahasya: the same Lord, different rūpa. Gauḍīya tattva holds Rāma and Kṛṣṇa as non-different in svarūpa though distinct in rasa.
  • nija - nātha - daivam — his own master and worshipable Deity
    Nija (own) + nātha (lord) + daiva (worshipable). Three words name three layers: Kṛṣṇa is Jāmbavān's natural lord, personal master, and ārādhya-devatā. Fighting his own iṣṭa-deva for twenty-seven days is the verse's quiet tragedy — and joy of resolution.
  • tri - nava - ahāni — three times nine days
    Tri (three) + nava (nine) + ahan (day). Twenty-seven — a numerologically full count in Vedic reckoning (the nakṣatras). The fight occupies a complete cycle before recognition comes.
  • pādau pragṛhya — taking hold of His feet
    Pādau (the two feet, dual) + pragṛhya (having taken hold). The exact same act Jāmbavān had performed in Rāma-līlā now performed in Kṛṣṇa-līlā — the body of service is the same; only the face of the Lord has changed. Gauḍīya sevā-tattva: hold the feet, the rest follows.
  • dāsī — maidservant
    Dāsī is the female counterpart of dāsa. Jāmbavatī chooses no other word for herself. Note: she does not name her status as queen of Dvārakā; she names her status as dāsī. Gauḍīya rasa-tattva: the highest queen and the lowliest servant are the same word in bhakti.
Śrī Jāmbavatī said: Unaware that Lord Kṛṣṇa was none other than his own master and worshipable Deity, the husband of Goddess Sītā, my father fought with Him for twenty-seven days. When my father finally came to his senses and recognized the Lord, he took hold of His feet and presented Him with both me and the Syamantaka jewel as tokens of his reverence. I am simply the Lord’s maidservant.

Jāmbavān had been Lord Rāmacandra’s servant many thousands of years before. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī mentions that while hearing Jāmbavatī’s story, the women present recognized her as the girl whom Jāmbavān had once offered to Lord Śrī Rāma to be His wife. Since Lord Rāma had taken a vow to have only one wife, He could not accept her then, but did so when He returned in the Dvāpara-yuga as Kṛṣṇa. The other queens wanted to honor Jāmbavatī for this, but she replied humbly, “I am just the Lord’s maidservant.” How Jāmbavatī and Satyabhāmā became Lord Kṛṣṇa’s wives is told in Chapter Fifty-six of the Tenth Canto.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Jāmbavatī said: Unaware that Lord Kṛṣṇa was none other than his own master and worshipable Deity, the husband of Goddess Sītā, my father fought with Him for twenty-seven days. When my father finally came to his senses and recognized the Lord, he took hold of His feet and presented Him with both me and the Syamantaka jewel as tokens of his reverence. I am simply the Lord's maidservant.
Commentary

Not knowing that Krsna was his own master and the supreme lord, my father (deha krt) fought with him for twenty seven days (tri navahani for tri nava ahani a is short to comply with the rules of meter). Then recognizing that he was the husband of Sita, he touched his feet, and offered me along with the jewel to Krsna. "O then now we remember that you were born during Rama’s appearance and promised to him, but the refused because he had taken a vow of only one wife. Now you have been accepted as wife by Krsna, who has many wives. Therefore you are the best." Hearing this Jambavati became embarrassed and said, "I am only his servant."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

My actual father (deha-kṛt) did not at all know (prājñāya) that Kṛṣṇa was the Lord because he was intent on fighting. In order to negate the impossibility that a bear was her father, he took a suitable form at will, since he was the son of a devatā. My father did not know that he was also the husband of Sītā. In order to deliver Sītā, Rāma did special service because of her excellent bhakti. Or Rāma illustrates the affection of the Lord for his devotee. Previously it was said they fought for twenty-eight days. Here it says twenty-seven days. In this case the last day is not counted. The Lord looked at him with mercy (pari—īkṣitaḥ) on all his limbs, touching him with his hands. Abhimṛśyāravindākṣaḥ pāṇinā śaṁ-kareṇa tam: Kṛṣṇa touched Jāmbavān with his hand, which bestows all blessings. (SB 10.56.30)

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

My actual father (deha-kṛt) did not at all know (prājñāya) that Kṛṣṇa was the Lord because he was intent on fighting. Otherwise he would not have fought with Kṛṣṇa. He was directly her father (deha-kṛt). In order to negate the impossibility that a bear was her father, he had taken a suitable form at will, since he was the son of a devatā. My father did not know that Kṛṣṇa was also the husband of Sītā. In order to deliver Sītā, Rāma did special service because of her excellent bhakti. Or Rāma illustrates the affection of the Lord for his devotee. Previously it was said they fought for twenty-eight days. Here it says twenty-seven days. In this case the last day is not counted. They fought intently (abhy ayudhyat). That was mentioned previously. He gave Kṛṣṇa the gem and me. dvandva-yuddhaṁ su-tumulam ubhayor vijigīṣatoḥ āyudhāśma-drumair dorbhiḥ kravyārthe śyenayor iva The two fought furiously in single combat, each determined to win. Contending against each other with various weapons and then with stones, tree trunks and finally their bare arms, they struggled like two hawks battling over a piece of flesh. SB 10.56.23 The Lord looked at him with mercy (pari—īkṣitaḥ) on all his limbs, touching him with his hands. Abhimṛśyāravindākṣaḥ pāṇinā śaṁ-kareṇa tam: Kṛṣṇa touched Jāmbavān with his hand, which bestows all blessings. (SB 10.56.30) Or recognizing him he gave the gem. Or not recognizing the Lord he fought with him. Later understanding completely (prājñāya), and knowing how to give respect (arhaṇam) he gave the gem.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)
Related verses
Jāmbavatī: my father, unaware Kṛṣṇa was his own worshipable Rāma, fought Him 27 days; when he recognized Him, he gave me and the jewel. Family disputes can mask deeper recognitions waiting to surface.
Reflection Questions
  • Where might I be 'fighting' something or someone whose true identity I haven't yet recognized?
  • What recognition would change the fight?

Jāmbavān, the same servant who searched for Sītā with Hanumān, did not at first recognize his old master in the new dark-blue form — a faithful old retainer striking at his own lord, twenty-seven days, until at the twenty-eighth he hears the familiar voice. He drops the gem and the daughter at the same feet he had served in another yuga. The verse is the moment of recognition, told from the daughter's side.

Jāmbavān in the Rāmāyaṇa

When Hanumān leapt across the ocean to find Sītā, it was Jāmbavān, the aged king of bears, who reminded him of his own forgotten strength: 'You are the son of Vāyu; rise and cross.' Jāmbavān served Rāma in that yuga and outlived it.

Now, in this yuga, the same Rāma has come as Kṛṣṇa, and Jāmbavān, not recognizing the new form, fights Him for twenty-seven days. On the twenty-eighth he hears Kṛṣṇa's voice and sees Rāma standing inside the new face — and his life-long service resumes mid-sentence. Jāmbavatī, fruit of that recognition, calls herself His dāsī. The same word her father has been waiting to say.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.11

↗
श्रीकालिन्द्युवाच तपश्चरन्तीमाज्ञाय स्वपादस्पर्शनाशया । सख्योपेत्याग्रहीत् पाणिं योऽहं तद्गृहमार्जनी ॥ ११ ॥
śrī-kālindy uvāca
[shree-kaalindy uvaacha]
tapaś carantīm ājñāya
[tapash charanteem aajnaaya]
sva-pāda-sparśanāśayā
[sva-paada-sparshanaashayaa]
sakhyopetyāgrahīt pāṇiṁ
[sakhyopetyaagraheet paanim]
yo ’haṁ tad-gṛha-mārjanī
[yo ’ham tad-griha-maarjanee]
śrī - kālindī uvāca — Śrī Kālindī said tapaḥ — penances carantīm — executing ājñāya — knowing sva — His pāda — of the feet sparśana — for the touch āśayā — with the desire sakhyā — together with His friend (Arjuna) upetya — coming agrahīt — took pāṇim — my hand yaḥ — who aham — I tat — His gṛha — of the residence mārjanī — the cleaner .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-kālindy uvāca
śrī - kālindī uvāca
Śrī Kālindī said
tapaś carantīm ājñāya
tapaḥ
penances
carantīm
executing
ājñāya
knowing
sva-pāda-sparśanāśayā
sva
His
pāda
of the feet
sparśana
for the touch
āśayā
with the desire
sakhyopetyāgrahīt pāṇiṁ
sakhyā
together with His friend (Arjuna)
upetya
coming
agrahīt
took
pāṇim
my hand
yaḥ
who
aham
I
yo ’haṁ tad-gṛha-mārjanī
tat
His
gṛha
of the residence
mārjanī
the cleaner .
  • tapaḥ — austerity
    Tapas — heat, the burning required to refine. Kālindī's marriage-route is pure tapas-bhakti: she heats herself until only the desired Lord remains. Gauḍīya reading: tapas alone does not produce Kṛṣṇa, but tapas joined to desire-for-Him does.
  • sva - pāda - sparśana - āśayā — with the hope of touching His feet
    Sva (His) + pāda (feet) + sparśana (touch) + āśayā (with desire). The entire object of her tapas is one foot-touch. Note: not lordship, not heaven, not liberation — pāda-sparśa. The grammar of Gauḍīya prema in five tokens.
  • sakhyā — with His friend (Arjuna)
    Instrumental of sakhi. Kṛṣṇa comes accompanied by His sakhā Arjuna — a small detail that Gauḍīya commentators love: even at His own wedding, the Lord brings His friend along. Sakhya-rasa attends mādhurya-rasa.
  • agrahīt pāṇim — He took (my) hand
    Agrahīt — He grasped. Pāṇi-grahaṇa is the technical Vedic gesture of marriage, the moment a bride becomes a wife. The verb is decisive: the tapas of years is consummated in one grasp.
  • gṛha - mārjanī — sweeper of the house
    Gṛha (house) + mārjanī (sweeper, broom). Kālindī, queen of Dvārakā, names her actual position as the one who sweeps His floor. Gauḍīya dāsya-tattva at its quietest: the queen is already the broom; the broom is already the consort.
Śrī Kālindī said: The Lord knew I was performing severe austerities and penances with the hope of one day touching His lotus feet. So He came to me in the company of His friend and took my hand in marriage. Now I am engaged as a sweeper in His palace.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Kālindī said: The Lord knew I was performing severe austerities and penances with the hope of one day touching His lotus feet. So He came to me in the company of His friend and took my hand in marriage. Now I am engaged as a sweeper in His palace.
Commentary

He approached me with Arjuna (sakhya).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kṛṣṇa came with his friend Arjuna (sakhyā).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He came with a friend. “Having performed austerities you were qualified to be his wife.” That is not so. I am his low servant, cleaning his house. I am not qualified as his wife.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Kālindī: knowing I was performing austerities to touch His feet, He came with His friend and took my hand; now I'm a sweeper in His palace. The deepest love asks for the lowest position; the heart values service over status.
Reflection Questions
  • What humble service to the Lord do I actually long for?
  • How does 'sweeper in the palace' feel more like fulfillment than higher posts?

Kālindī had no king-father to negotiate, no svayaṁvara to host. She had only the Yamunā's bank and her own tapas — sitting with the desire to touch a single dust-particle of Kṛṣṇa's foot. The wedding-route here is tapas-vivāha: heat the body until the Lord Himself, walking by with His friend, stops and asks her hand. She names her future role not as queen but as gṛha-mārjanī — the sweeper of His house.

Arjuna at the Yamunā

In SB 10.58, Arjuna, visiting Dvārakā, accompanied Kṛṣṇa on a chariot-ride along the Yamunā. They came upon a beautiful woman performing tapas — Kālindī, daughter of the sun-god, who had built a residence in the waters of the river named after her.

Kṛṣṇa asked her what she sought; she said she had been performing austerities for years for one purpose: to obtain Him as her husband. He took her hand on the spot and brought her to Dvārakā. The verse here is her own one-sentence summary. Gauḍīyas note the tapas-route: no dowry, no bow, no battle — only steady longing, and Bhagavān walks by.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.12

↗
श्रीमित्रविन्दोवाच यो मां स्वयंवर उपेत्य विजित्य भूपान् निन्ये श्वयूथगमिवात्मबलिं द्विपारि: । भ्रातृंश्च मेऽपकुरुत: स्वपुरं श्रियौक- स्तस्यास्तु मेऽनुभवमङ्घ्रय‍वनेजनत्वम् ॥ १२ ॥
śrī-mitravindovāca
[shree-mitravindovaacha]
yo māṁ svayaṁvara upetya vijitya bhū-pān
[yo maam svayamvara upetya vijitya bhoo-paan]
ninye śva-yūtha-gaṁ ivātma-baliṁ dvipāriḥ
[ninye shva-yootha-gam ivaatma-balim dvipaarih]
bhrātṝṁś ca me ’pakurutaḥ sva-puraṁ śriyaukas
[bhraatreemsh cha me ’pakurutah sva-puram shriyaukas]
tasyāstu me ’nu-bhavam aṅghry-avanejanatvam
[tasyaastu me ’nu-bhavam anghry-avanejanatvam]
śrī - mitravindā uvāca — Śrī Mitravindā said yaḥ — who mām — me svayaṁ - vare — during my svayaṁvara (the ceremony in which a princess chooses a husband from a number of eligible suitors) upetya — coming forward vijitya — after defeating bhū - pān — kings ninye — took śva — of dogs yūtha — into a group gam — gone iva — as if ātma — own balim — share dvipa - ariḥ — a lion (“enemy of elephants”) bhrātṝn — brothers ca — and me — my apakurutaḥ — who were insulting Him sva — to His puram — capital city śrī — of the goddess of fortune okaḥ — the residence tasya — His astu — may be me — for me anu - bhavam — life after life aṅghri — the feet avanejanatvam — the status of washing .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-mitravindovāca
śrī - mitravindā uvāca
Śrī Mitravindā said
yo māṁ svayaṁvara upetya vijitya bhū-pān
yaḥ
who
ninye śva-yūtha-gaṁ ivātma-baliṁ dvipāriḥ
mām
me
bhrātṝṁś ca me ’pakurutaḥ sva-puraṁ śriyaukas
svayaṁ - vare
during my svayaṁvara (the ceremony in which a princess chooses a husband from a number of eligible suitors)
upetya
coming forward
vijitya
after defeating
tasyāstu me ’nu-bhavam aṅghry-avanejanatvam
bhū - pān
kings
ninye
took
śva
of dogs
yūtha
into a group
gam
gone
iva
as if
ātma
own
balim
share
dvipa - ariḥ
a lion (“enemy of elephants”)
bhrātṝn
brothers
ca
and
me
my
apakurutaḥ
who were insulting Him
sva
to His
puram
capital city
śrī
of the goddess of fortune
okaḥ
the residence
tasya
His
astu
may be
me
for me
anu - bhavam
life after life
aṅghri
the feet
avanejanatvam
the status of washing .
  • svayaṁ - vare — at the self-choice ceremony
    Svayam (self) + vara (choosing, bridegroom). The Vedic institution by which a princess herself selects her husband. The chapter contrasts svayaṁvara (Mitravindā, Lakṣmaṇā), rākṣasa-vivāha (Rukmiṇī), tapas (Kālindī), and dāna (Bhadrā, Satyā) as four valid routes — Bhagavān honors them all.
  • dvipa - ariḥ — enemy of elephants (i.e., a lion)
    Dvipa (elephant) + ari (enemy) — kenning for the lion. Mitravindā escalates Rukmiṇī's mṛgendraḥ image: not just lord-of-beasts but specifically the one elephants fear. Her brothers, who thought themselves powerful, were street-dogs by comparison.
  • aṅghri - avanejanatvam — the status of washing the feet
    Aṅghri (foot) + avanejana (washing) + tva (-ness). She asks not to be queen but to hold the office of foot-washer. Gauḍīya sevā-tattva: the lowest service is the highest position. Note the abstract suffix tvam — she wants the office itself, perpetually.
  • anu - bhavam — life after life
    Anu (following) + bhava (becoming, birth). She does not ask for liberation from birth — she asks to keep being born, provided each birth contains the foot-washing service. Gauḍīya bhakti's classic refusal of mokṣa-as-cessation.
  • apakurutaḥ — (those who were) insulting
    Apa (away from) + √kṛ (do). A precise word for the offence: not just opposing, but apa-karaṇa — anti-action, doing the wrong thing toward the Lord. The brothers' apakāra is what Kṛṣṇa's lion-step corrected.
Śrī Mitravindā said: At my svayaṁvara ceremony He came forward, defeated all the kings present — including my brothers, who dared insult Him — and took me away just as a lion removes his prey from amidst a pack of dogs. Thus Lord Kṛṣṇa, the shelter of the goddess of fortune, brought me to His capital city. May I be allowed to serve Him by washing His feet, life after life.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Mitravindā said: At my svayaṁ-vara ceremony He came forward, defeated all the kings present—including my brothers, who dared insult Him—and took me away just as a lion removes his prey from amidst a pack of dogs. Thus Lord Kṛṣṇa, the shelter of the goddess of fortune, brought me to His capital city. May I be allowed to serve Him by washing His feet, life after life.
Commentary

As a lion takes his share from a pack of dogs, defeating the kings and my offensive brothers, Krsna, the abode of Laksmi (sriyaukah) took me to his city. May I take repeated births as a washer of his lotus feet.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

In place of Mitravindā, Bhadṛā is described here in Śrīdhara Svāmī’s version. In the Madhva line also, this verse occurs here. There were actually two brothers Vinda and Anuvinda but here many brothers are mentioned. But the meaning is the same. Śriyaukaḥ instead of sriyah okaḥ (abode Lakṣmī) is poetic license. It indicates Kṛṣṇa or can modify “his city.”

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

There were actually two brothers Vinda and Anuvinda but here many brothers are mentioned. They were the chief persons to oppose her marriage to the Lord, and were thus mentioned. However there were many others present who opposed the marriage also. Śriyaukaḥ instead of sriyah okaḥ (abode Lakṣmī) is poetic license. He is the abode of Lakṣmī. I am thus not qualified. Therefore let me wash his feet in every birth. Or he brought me to his city, the abode of Lakṣmī, though I was unqualified to go there. He brought me there by his mercy.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Mitravindā: at my svayaṁvara He defeated my insulting brothers and took me like a lion from a pack of dogs. May I serve Him by washing His feet, life after life. The lion-image returns; bhakti is rescue.
Reflection Questions
  • From what 'pack of dogs' has the Lord rescued me?
  • What lifelong service do I want to offer in gratitude?

At Mitravindā's svayaṁvara her own brothers stood between her and her chosen Lord, insulting Him; Kṛṣṇa stepped through them as a lion steps through a pack of barking street-dogs and carried her away. Her closing word is not 'queen' but aṅghri-avanejana — let me wash His feet, life after life. The svayaṁvara was the door; the foot-washing is the room.

Mitravindā at the bridal hall

Mitravindā was the daughter of Kṛṣṇa's paternal aunt Rājādhidevī, and her own brothers Vinda and Anuvinda — allied with Duryodhana — opposed her choosing Kṛṣṇa. At her svayaṁvara, her heart already fixed on Him, she walked toward Him; her brothers stepped in to block her.

In SB 10.58, Kṛṣṇa carried her off in His chariot before the assembled kings, defeating those who resisted. Her own verse here calls her brothers 'dogs' — strong language softened by bhakti's clarity: anything that comes between the soul and Kṛṣṇa's feet earns that name.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.13-14

↗
श्रीसत्योवाच सप्तोक्षणोऽतिबलवीर्यसुतीक्ष्णश‍ृङ्गान् पित्रा कृतान् क्षितिपवीर्यपरीक्षणाय । तान् वीरदुर्मदहनस्तरसा निगृह्य क्रीडन् बबन्ध ह यथा शिशवोऽजतोकान् ॥ १३ ॥ य इत्थं वीर्यशुल्कां मां दासीभिश्चतुरङ्गिणीम् । पथि निर्जित्य राजन्यान् निन्ये तद्दास्यमस्तु मे ॥ १४ ॥
śrī-satyovāca
[shree-satyovaacha]
saptokṣaṇo ’ti-bala-vīrya-su-tīkṣṇa-śṛṅgān
[saptokshano ’ti-bala-veerya-su-teekshna-shringaan]
pitrā kṛtān kṣitipa-vīrya-parīkṣaṇāya
[pitraa kritaan kshitipa-veerya-pareekshanaaya]
tān vīra-durmada-hanas tarasā nigṛhya
[taan veera-durmada-hanas tarasaa nigrihya]
krīḍan babandha ha yathā śiśavo ’ja-tokān
[kreedan babandha ha yathaa shishavo ’ja-tokaan]
ya itthaṁ vīrya-śulkāṁ māṁ
[ya ittham veerya-shulkaam maam]
dāsībhiś catur-angiṇīm
[daaseebhish chatur-angineem]
pathi nirjitya rājanyān
[pathi nirjitya raajanyaan]
ninye tad-dāsyam astu me
[ninye tad-daasyam astu me]
śrī - satyā uvāca — Śrī Satyā said sapta — seven ukṣaṇaḥ — bulls ati — great bala — whose strength vīrya — and vitality su — very tīkṣṇa — sharp śṛṅgān — whose horns pitrā — by my father kṛtān — made kṣitipa — of the kings vīrya — the prowess parīkṣaṇāya — for testing tān — them (the bulls) vīra — of heroes durmada — the false pride hanaḥ — who destroyed tarasā — quickly nigṛhya — subduing krīḍan — playing babandha ha — He tied up yathā — as śiśavaḥ — children aja — of goats tokān — the infants yaḥ — who ittham — in this manner vīrya — heroism śulkām — whose price mām — me dāsībhiḥ — with maidservants catuḥ - aṅgiṇīm — protected by an army of four divisions (chariots, horses, elephants and infantry) pathi — along the road nirjitya — defeating rājanyān — the kings ninye — He took me away tat — to Him dāsyam — servitude astu — may there be me — my .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-satyovāca
śrī - satyā uvāca
Śrī Satyā said
sapta
seven
ukṣaṇaḥ
bulls
ati
great
saptokṣaṇo ’ti-bala-vīrya-su-tīkṣṇa-śṛṅgān
bala
whose strength
vīrya
and vitality
su
very
tīkṣṇa
sharp
śṛṅgān
whose horns
pitrā kṛtān kṣitipa-vīrya-parīkṣaṇāya
pitrā
by my father
kṛtān
made
kṣitipa
of the kings
vīrya
the prowess
parīkṣaṇāya
for testing
tān vīra-durmada-hanas tarasā nigṛhya
tān
them (the bulls)
vīra
of heroes
durmada
the false pride
hanaḥ
who destroyed
tarasā
quickly
nigṛhya
subduing
krīḍan babandha ha yathā śiśavo ’ja-tokān
krīḍan
playing
babandha ha
He tied up
yathā
as
śiśavaḥ
children
ya itthaṁ vīrya-śulkāṁ māṁ
dāsībhiś catur-angiṇīm
pathi nirjitya rājanyān
aja
of goats
tokān
the infants
yaḥ
who
ittham
in this manner
vīrya
heroism
śulkām
whose price
ninye tad-dāsyam astu me
mām
me
dāsībhiḥ
with maidservants
catuḥ - aṅgiṇīm
protected by an army of four divisions (chariots, horses, elephants and infantry)
pathi
along the road
nirjitya
defeating
rājanyān
the kings
ninye
He took me away
tat
to Him
dāsyam
servitude
astu
may there be
me
my .
  • sapta ukṣaṇaḥ — seven bulls
    Sapta (seven) + ukṣan (bull). The number is doctrinal — Gauḍīya commentators identify the seven bulls with the seven indriyas or the seven kinds of mada (pride). Subduing them is the inner work the Lord performs effortlessly for any soul who has fixed Him as her vīrya-śulka.
  • krīḍan — playing
    Present participle of √krīḍ — to play. The verb that names the same teaching as līlā (which becomes explicit in verse 25-26). Whatever appears to others as struggle (Nagnajit's bulls, Rukmī's army, Jāmbavān's strength) is for Kṛṣṇa krīḍana — free play. The Gauḍīya doctrine of līlā insists Bhagavān is never strained.
  • vīrya - śulkām — whose price is heroism
    Vīrya (heroism) + śulka (bride-price). A bride 'priced by valor' — the older Vedic institution by which a kanyā's hand was tied to a heroic deed. Bhagavān pays the price without effort because the valor is His own internal śakti, not strain.
  • tat - dāsyam — servitude to Him
    Tat (His) + dāsya (servitude). Satyā closes with the same prayer Rukmiṇī, Jāmbavatī, Kālindī, and Mitravindā have made: not queen-hood but dāsyam. The chapter's refrain is fixing into form.
  • durmada — false pride
    Dus (bad) + mada (intoxication). The bulls' role was durmada-hanaḥ — destroyers of false pride. The bulls humbled prior suitors; Kṛṣṇa humbled the bulls. Each defeat-by-bull was a small mercy to those kings, exposing their false vīrya before they could claim Satyā wrongly.
Śrī Satyā said: My father arranged for seven extremely powerful and vigorous bulls with deadly sharp horns to test the prowess of the kings who desired my hand in marriage. Although these bulls destroyed the false pride of many heroes, Lord Kṛṣṇa subdued them effortlessly, tying them up in the same way that children playfully tie up a goat’s kids. He thus purchased me with His valor. Then He took me away with my maidservants and a full army of four divisions, defeating all the kings who opposed Him along the road. May I be granted the privilege of serving that Lord.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Satyā said: My father arranged for seven extremely powerful and vigorous bulls with deadly sharp horns to test the prowess of the kings who desired my hand in marriage. Although these bulls destroyed the false pride of many heroes, Lord Kṛṣṇa subdued them effortlessly, tying them up in the same way that children playfully tie up a goat's kids. He thus purchased me with His valor. Then He took me away with my maidservants and a full army of four divisions, defeating all the kings who opposed Him along the road. May I be granted the privilege of serving that Lord.
Commentary

Seven strong bulls were arranged by my father for testing the strength of king in order to give me to the strongest one. He bound up those bulls, which kill the pride of the strong, very easily (kridan), as children tie up baby goats. Having paid the price with his courage, (viryam sulkam), he took me along my servants, and with a full contingent of armies (caturanganim) to his city.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Ukṣaṇaḥ (bulls) should be ukṣṇaḥ. Though it is said her father wanted to test the strength of kings actually he arranged the test in order to give his daughter to Kṛṣṇa. This has been stated previously. Babandha ha means “he tied up all the bulls immediately.” He did this as play, just as children tie up baby goats. The plural is used (children) since he expanded himself in seven forms to tie up seven bulls. Kṛṣṇa paid the price of valor in that he observed the conditions for marriage made by her father.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They were powerful and vigorous bulls with deadly sharp horns. The characteristics are listed in order of stronger reasons for difficulty in restraining them. Though it is said her father wanted to test the strength of kings, actually he arranged the test in order to give his daughter to Kṛṣṇa. This has been stated previously. Babandha ha means “he tied up all the bulls immediately.” He did this as play, just as children tie up baby goats. The plural is used (children) since he expanded himself in seven forms to tie up seven bulls. Or it is the nature of all children to play in this manner. Though with Rukmiṇī as well as Mitravinda the Lord defeated other kings and took the bride at the price of his valor, there it is particularly mentioned because at this time Kṛṣṇa observed the conditions for marriage made by her father. I am not the queen but am simply a servant. But I desire to serve his feet eternally.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
Concepts
Satya
Satyā: my father set seven deadly bulls; Kṛṣṇa tied them like children tying kid goats and purchased me with His valor. The Lord makes light of what destroyed others; what crushes some, He plays with.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life looks like a 'seven deadly bulls' obstacle that the Lord could handle with ease?
  • How does that recognition change my approach?

King Nagnajit tied his daughter's hand to a price: subdue seven invincible bulls. The kings tried and were gored; Kṛṣṇa stepped into the ring and tied them up the way village children tie up baby goats — playfully, with one hand. The dānam route here is vīrya-śulkā — purchased by valor — and the price Bhagavān paid was a smile.

The seven bulls of Kauśalā

In SB 10.58, King Nagnajit of Kauśalā (Ayodhyā) had made a vow: his daughter Satyā (Nāgnajitī) would marry only the man who could subdue seven fierce bulls with sharp horns. Many heroes had tried and been thrown.

Kṛṣṇa came, expanded Himself into seven forms simultaneously, subdued all seven bulls at once, and tied them up effortlessly. Nagnajit, recognizing the Lord, gave Satyā along with a dowry of an akṣauhiṇī army. On the road back to Dvārakā the defeated kings attacked, and Arjuna and Kṛṣṇa together routed them. Satyā's verse here compresses all of it into the single image of children tying up goats.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.15-16

↗
श्रीभद्रोवाच पिता मे मातुलेयाय स्वयमाहूय दत्तवान् । कृष्णे कृष्णाय तच्चित्तामक्षौहिण्या सखीजनै: ॥ १५ ॥ अस्य मे पादसंस्पर्शो भवेज्जन्मनि जन्मनि । कर्मभिर्भ्राम्यमाणाया येन तच्छ्रेय आत्मन: ॥ १६ ॥
śrī-bhadrovāca
[shree-bhadrovaacha]
pitā me mātuleyāya
[pitaa me maatuleyaaya]
svayam āhūya dattavān
[svayam aahooya dattavaan]
kṛṣṇe kṛṣṇāya tac-cittām
[krishne krishnaaya tach-chittaam]
akṣauhiṇyā sakhī-janaiḥ
[akshauhinyaa sakhee-janaih]
asya me pāda-saṁsparśo
[asya me paada-samsparsho]
bhavej janmani janmani
[bhavej janmani janmani]
karmabhir bhrāmyamāṇāyā
[karmabhir bhraamyamaanaayaa]
yena tac chreya ātmanaḥ
[yena tach chreya aatmanah]
śrī - bhadrā uvāca — Śrī Bhadrā said pitā — father me — my mātuleyāya — to my maternal cousin svayam — of his own accord āhūya — inviting dattavān — gave kṛṣṇe — O Kṛṣṇā (Draupadī) kṛṣṇāya — to Lord Kṛṣṇa tat — absorbed in whom cittām — whose heart akṣauhiṇyā — with an akṣauhiṇī military guard sakhī - janaiḥ — and with my female companions asya — His me — for me pāda — of the feet saṁsparśaḥ — the touch bhavet — may it be janmani janmani — in one life after another karmabhiḥ — due to the reactions of material activities bhrāmyamāṇāyāḥ — who will be wandering yena — by which tat — that śreyaḥ — ultimate perfection ātmanaḥ — of myself .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhadrovāca
śrī - bhadrā uvāca
Śrī Bhadrā said
pitā me mātuleyāya
pitā
father
me
my
mātuleyāya
to my maternal cousin
svayam āhūya dattavān
svayam
of his own accord
āhūya
inviting
dattavān
gave
kṛṣṇe kṛṣṇāya tac-cittām
kṛṣṇe
O Kṛṣṇā (Draupadī)
kṛṣṇāya
to Lord Kṛṣṇa
tat
absorbed in whom
cittām
whose heart
akṣauhiṇyā sakhī-janaiḥ
akṣauhiṇyā
with an akṣauhiṇī military guard
sakhī - janaiḥ
and with my female companions
asya me pāda-saṁsparśo
asya
His
me
for me
pāda
of the feet
saṁsparśaḥ
the touch
bhavej janmani janmani
bhavet
may it be
janmani janmani
in one life after another
karmabhir bhrāmyamāṇāyā
karmabhiḥ
due to the reactions of material activities
bhrāmyamāṇāyāḥ
who will be wandering
yena tac chreya ātmanaḥ
yena
by which
tat
that
śreyaḥ
ultimate perfection
ātmanaḥ
of myself .
  • mātuleyāya — to (Kṛṣṇa, who is her) maternal cousin
    Mātulā (mother's sister) + suffix -eya — one related through the mother's side. Bhadrā's mother was Kṛṣṇa's father Vasudeva's sister Śrutakīrti; Kṛṣṇa is therefore her cousin. The dāna of the daughter is also the keeping-within-the-family of Yadu rakta.
  • tat - cittām — whose heart was absorbed in Him
    Tat (Him) + citta (mind). Her father gave her to Kṛṣṇa because she had already given herself to Him in citta. Gauḍīya reading: external arrangement only ratifies the internal bhāva — the marriage was already complete in her heart.
  • saṁsparśaḥ — the touch
    Sam (full) + sparśa (touch). She does not ask for sight or memory but for sparśa — direct foot-contact, life after life. The intimate end of the bhakti-spectrum: not just darśana but touch.
  • janmani janmani — in birth after birth
    Doubled locative — repetition for emphasis. The same refrain Mitravindā used (anu-bhavam): not liberation from birth, but birth as the vessel for renewed pāda-saṁsparśa. The Gauḍīya formula iṣṭa-deva-svarūpe sthitiḥ — staying with the Lord through every birth.
  • śreyaḥ — ultimate perfection
    Śreyas — the highest good, contrasted with preyas (the pleasing). Bhadrā names pāda-saṁsparśa janmani janmani as her śreyas. Not mokṣa, not lordship — touch of His feet repeated forever.
Śrī Bhadrā said: My dear Draupadī, of his own free will my father invited his nephew Kṛṣṇa, to whom I had already dedicated my heart, and offered me to Him as His bride. My father presented me to the Lord with an akṣauhiṇi military guard and a retinue of my female companions. My ultimate perfection is this: to always be allowed to touch Lord Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet as I wander from life to life, bound by my karma.

With the word ātmanaḥ, Queen Bhadrā speaks not only for herself but for all living entities as well. The soul’s perfection ( śreya ātmanaḥ ) is devotional service to Lord Kṛṣṇa, both in this world and beyond, in liberation. Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī comments that although in civilized society it is normally considered disrespectful to publicly speak the name of one’s guru or husband, Lord Kṛṣṇa’s name is unique: the mere utterance of the name Kṛṣṇa is commendable as the highest expression of reverence for God. As the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (4.19) states, yasya nāma mahad yaśaḥ: “The holy name of the Lord is supremely glorious.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Bhadrā said: My dear Draupadī, of his own free will my father invited his nephew Kṛṣṇa, to whom I had already dedicated my heart, and offered me to Him as His bride. My father presented me to the Lord with an akṣauhiṇi military guard and a retinue of my female companions. My ultimate perfection is this: to always be allowed to touch Lord Kṛṣṇa's lotus feet as I wander from life to life, bound by my karma.
Commentary

O Draupadi (krsne), my father offered me to son of my maternal uncle, Krsna. (mitravinda was the daughter of Jayasena and Rajadhidevi, sister of Vasudeva). "May I, rotating birth after birth due to karma, attain the touch of his lotus feet, by which I will attain the highest goal (sreyah)." This is an expression of humility, in playing the part of a human being, since she has no karma.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Mitravindā speak here instead of Bhadrā in Śrīdhara Svāmī’s version. Though she was offered by her brothers as stated previously, here she says her father gave her. She was promised by her brothers. With everyone’s consent, my father personally called Kṛṣṇa and gave me to him since I had given my heart to him, since Kṛṣṇa attracts everyone’s heart (kṛṣṇāya). She mentioned the name of her husband directly (though this is normally not done) because on remembering him and their good fortune, she and the other queens become overcome with unmāda. Because of this they speak without reservation. Or they speak his name with pride. In the material world it is a fault to say the husband’s name without any descriptive terms since it shows disrespect by making him appear insignificant. To say the name of the Lord however is not a fault but a good quality, since it indicates the Lord’s greatness. Therefore saying the Lord’s names directly is a show of respect. Śruti says yasya nāma mahad yaśaḥ: the Lord’s name is full of great qualities. (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad) May I be able to touch his feet, by massaging them and other services, as I wander about by karmas birth after birth. As part of the human pastimes she shows indifference to all other human goals.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Mitravindā speak here instead of Bhadrā in Śrīdhara Svāmī’s version. Though she was offered by her brothers as stated previously, here she says her father gave her, since the brothers are non-different from the father. Or she was promised by her brothers. With everyone’s consent, my father personally called Kṛṣṇa and gave me to him. The cause of calling Kṛṣṇa and giving to him is stated. I had dedicated by heart to him (tac-cittām), because he was the attractor of all hearts (kṛṣṇāya). She calls out to Draupadī to indicate that her case was special since she was given by her father, by the daughter’s will. May I touch his feet, massaging them, birth after birth as I wander about here and there by karma or as I am born in various bodies. I do not aspire for Vaikuṇṭha because touching his feet is the highest for me.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)
Related verses
Concepts
KarmaGuru
Bhadrā: my father invited Kṛṣṇa, to whom I had already dedicated my heart, and offered me with an akṣauhiṇī guard. My perfection is to touch His lotus feet, life after life. The bound feet are the freed soul.
Reflection Questions
  • What is the 'perfection' I am actually seeking — and is it touching His feet?
  • How does this clarify what I am chasing?

Bhadrā's father, Kṛṣṇa's own maternal uncle, did not wait for a svayaṁvara or a contest. Knowing his daughter's heart was already given, he simply invited his nephew and offered her — with an akṣauhiṇī army for dowry and her childhood companions to follow. The dānam route, in its sweetest form: a relative giving a relative, no test required because the bhakti was already there.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.17

↗
श्रीलक्ष्मणोवाच ममापि राज्ञ्यच्युतजन्मकर्म श्रुत्वा मुहुर्नारदगीतमास ह । चित्तं मुकुन्दे किल पद्महस्तया वृत: सुसम्मृश्य विहाय लोकपान् ॥ १७ ॥
śrī-lakṣmaṇovāca
[shree-lakshmanovaacha]
mamāpi rājñy acyuta-janma-karma
[mamaapi raajny achyuta-janma-karma]
śrutvā muhur nārada-gītam āsa ha
[shrutvaa muhur naarada-geetam aasa ha]
cittaṁ mukunde kila padma-hastayā
[chittam mukunde kila padma-hastayaa]
vṛtaḥ su-sammṛśya vihāya loka-pān
[vritah su-sammrishya vihaaya loka-paan]
śrī - lakṣmaṇā uvāca — Śrī Lakṣmaṇā said mama — my api — also rājñi — O Queen acyuta — of Lord Kṛṣṇa janma — about the births karma — and activities śrutvā — hearing muhuḥ — repeatedly nārada — by Nārada Muni gītam — chanted āsa ha — became cittam — my heart mukunde — (fixed) upon Mukunda kila — indeed padma - hastayā — by the supreme goddess of fortune, who holds a lotus in her hand vṛtaḥ — chosen su — carefully sammṛśya — considering vihāya — rejecting loka — of planets pān — the rulers .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-lakṣmaṇovāca
śrī - lakṣmaṇā uvāca
Śrī Lakṣmaṇā said
mama
my
mamāpi rājñy acyuta-janma-karma
api
also
rājñi
O Queen
acyuta
of Lord Kṛṣṇa
janma
about the births
karma
and activities
śrutvā muhur nārada-gītam āsa ha
śrutvā
hearing
muhuḥ
repeatedly
nārada
by Nārada Muni
gītam
chanted
āsa ha
became
cittaṁ mukunde kila padma-hastayā
cittam
my heart
mukunde
(fixed) upon Mukunda
kila
indeed
padma - hastayā
by the supreme goddess of fortune, who holds a lotus in her hand
vṛtaḥ su-sammṛśya vihāya loka-pān
vṛtaḥ
chosen
su
carefully
sammṛśya
considering
vihāya
rejecting
loka
of planets
pān
the rulers .
  • nārada - gītam — sung by Nārada
    Nārada (Nārada Muni) + gītam (sung). Śravaṇa-bhakti's emblem-source: the wandering muni's vīṇā. Gauḍīya tradition holds that all four sampradāyas trace back to Nārada in one way or another — every Hari-kathā being sung today is downstream of his gītam.
  • mukunde — in/on Mukunda
    Locative of Mukunda — He who gives mukti. Lakṣmaṇā's heart fixes on the name that promises liberation, but she does not ask for liberation; she asks for Mukunda Himself. Gauḍīya: the name carries the bhāva regardless of its semantic content.
  • padma - hastayā — by her of the lotus-hand (Lakṣmī)
    Padma (lotus) + hasta (hand). A title of Mahā-Lakṣmī. The verse invokes Lakṣmī as the precedent: even she, with all the world's suitors, chose Kṛṣṇa after careful weighing. Lakṣmaṇā's own choice is thus aligned with the goddess of fortune's own.
  • su - sammṛśya — having carefully considered
    Su (well) + sam (fully) + √mṛś (to weigh, to touch with thought). The verse insists Lakṣmī's choice was deliberate — not impulse. Bhakti is not weakness of judgment; it is the most careful judgment, after which all rival options are vihāya — set aside.
  • vṛtaḥ — chosen
    Past participle of √vṛ — to choose. The same root as svayaṁ-vara. Lakṣmī's vara is named here as the precedent for Lakṣmaṇā's own vara: the goddess chose, the king's daughter chose, in unbroken line.
Śrī Lakṣmaṇā said: O Queen, I repeatedly heard Nārada Muni glorify the appearances and activities of Acyuta, and thus my heart also became attached to that Lord, Mukunda. Indeed, even Goddess Padmahastā chose Him as her husband after careful consideration, rejecting the great demigods who rule various planets.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Śrī Lakṣmaṇā said: O Queen, I repeatedly heard Nārada Muni glorify the appearances and activities of Acyuta, and thus my heart also became attached to that Lord, Mukunda. Indeed, even Goddess Padmahastā chose Him as her husband after careful consideration, rejecting the great demigods who rule various planets.
Commentary

My heart was (asa) attached to Mukunda. He was chosen ( vrtah) by me, holding a lotus in my hand, after I had refused the protectors of the directions as my husband.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Lakṣmaṇā then spoke. She thought that the other queens spoke their stories of their good fortune very briefly because of shyness, though the events were full of the highest bliss. She then thought that perhaps Draupadī’s and her own wedding were most attractive. Being proud of these two weddings, taking advantage after the senior seven queens, she began speaking of her own wedding in detail without restraint. I heard of the birth from Devakī of Kṛṣṇa, full of all powers (acyutasya), and heard of his activities in Gokula, and his form and qualities as well. “Bhadrā became attracted to him because of knowing of his birth, since he was close as a cousin. How did you hear about him?” I heard through Nārada constantly and became constantly attracted to him. The word ha indicates joy. “But it is not proper to be attracted to someone who has many other lovers.” On considering this, she says that he alone was her goal. Lakṣmī, holding the lotus, having many attractive gestures, on considering carefully (su and sam indicate her ability to do so), she rejected Brahmā, Śiva and others completely, without even looking at them, and chose Mukunda at the time of churning the Milk Ocean. I became attracted to him alone, with similar consideration. Or, my heart was attracted to Mukunda. Fixed on him alone after careful consideration, with lotus in hand, giving up all the great kings, I chose him. This is also suggested by taking the second part of the verse as the actions of Lakṣmī. She speaks the pastime in brief in this verse and the gives details in the following verses.

Related values
Brahmacharya (Self-discipline / Restraint)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
Concepts
Karma
Lakṣmaṇā: hearing Nārada repeatedly glorify Kṛṣṇa, my heart became attached. Hearing creates attraction; even Lakṣmī chose Him after deliberation. Devotion follows from sustained listening.
Reflection Questions
  • What repeated hearing has shaped my heart's attraction?
  • What new hearing could shape it further?

Lakṣmaṇā heard Nārada sing Kṛṣṇa's birth and deeds over and over — and the cittam followed the sound the way iron follows a magnet. Even Padmahastā Lakṣmī, with every demigod-suitor to choose from, chose Him after careful consideration; Lakṣmaṇā places herself in that lineage. Her route is śravaṇa-vivāha: ears first, heart following, body brought by the father.

Nārada's wandering kīrtana

Nārada Muni travels the three worlds singing Hari-kathā with his vīṇā. SB 1.5-6 records his own origin story: as the son of a maidservant, he ate the remnants of sages, heard kṛṣṇa-kathā, and his heart was bound forever.

Lakṣmaṇā's verse credits Nārada's gītam — the chanted glorification — with fixing her cittam on Mukunda. Gauḍīya tradition treats this as the standard pattern: bhakti enters through the ear-cup, and once the citta has chosen, the body and family arrangements follow. Nārada's vīṇā has produced many such marriages — Dhruva, Prahlāda, Mṛgāri the hunter — though only Lakṣmaṇā's was a literal wedding.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.18

↗
ज्ञात्वा मम मतं साध्वि पिता दुहितृवत्सल: । बृहत्सेन इति ख्यातस्तत्रोपायमचीकरत् ॥ १८ ॥
jñātvā mama mataṁ sādhvi
[jnaatvaa mama matam saadhvi]
pitā duhitṛ-vatsalaḥ
[pitaa duhitri-vatsalah]
bṛhatsena iti khyātas
[brihatsena iti khyaatas]
tatropāyam acīkarat
[tatropaayam acheekarat]
jñātvā — knowing mama — my matam — mentality sādhvi — O saintly lady pitā — my father duhitṛ — to his daughter vatsalaḥ — affectionate bṛhatsenaḥ iti khyātaḥ — known as Bṛhatsena tatra — toward this end upāyam — a means acīkarat — arranged .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
jñātvā mama mataṁ sādhvi
jñātvā
knowing
mama
my
matam
mentality
sādhvi
O saintly lady
pitā duhitṛ-vatsalaḥ
pitā
my father
duhitṛ
to his daughter
vatsalaḥ
affectionate
bṛhatsena iti khyātas
bṛhatsenaḥ iti khyātaḥ
known as Bṛhatsena
tatra
toward this end
upāyam
a means
tatropāyam acīkarat
acīkarat
arranged .
  • vatsalaḥ — affectionate (like to a calf)
    From vatsa (calf). The same root word that names Yaśodā's vātsalya-rasa toward Kṛṣṇa — here applied to a father toward his daughter. The Gauḍīya web of vātsalya is wider than parent-to-Lord: it is any tender protective love bent toward the smaller one.
  • duhitṛ — to the daughter
    Duhitṛ — daughter, etymologically 'milker', the one who milks the family cows. The word places Lakṣmaṇā in the household's normal economy; her father's vātsalya for her is the same as for any beloved child.
  • matam — mentality, inner intention
    From √man (to think). Bṛhatsena knew her mata — her settled intention. Gauḍīya reading: a true mata for Kṛṣṇa cannot be hidden long; even external relatives perceive it. The verse models the proper response — arrangement, not opposition.
  • bṛhatsenaḥ iti khyātaḥ — known as Bṛhatsena
    Bṛhat (great) + sena (army) + iti khyātaḥ (so renowned). Lakṣmaṇā's father is a great king. The verse pauses to name him because the test he is about to design (verse 19's hidden fish) requires both his army and his ingenuity.
  • sādhvi — O saintly lady
    Vocative of sādhvī. Lakṣmaṇā addresses Draupadī as fellow sādhvī — the chapter is a sister-to-sister exchange. The diminutive of formality marks the intimacy of these conversations.
My father, Bṛhatsena, was by nature compassionate to his daughter, and knowing how I felt, O saintly lady, he arranged to fulfill my desire.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My father, Bṛhatsena, was by nature compassionate to his daughter, and knowing how I felt, O saintly lady, he arranged to fulfill my desire.
Commentary

Just a fish was made with a desire to get Arjuna as your husband( or which was pierced by arjuna’ arrow, as (parthesv apakrta) in seen in some texts), in my case also a fish was made. But the could not Arjuna also pierce this fish? This fish, which was moving very quickly, could only be seen by looking at it as a reflection in a pot of water placed at the bottom of the pole. It could not be seen by looking up. Only by looking down could one aim upwards. It could thus not be pierced by anyone except Krsna. The fish made by your father, though covered, could be aimed at by looking upwards following the pole, and thus could be pierced by the expert marksman Arjuna.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Matam means her decision.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Matam means her desire. O chaste lady! You would also have such desires. Just as your father was affectionate to you because you were chaste, so my father was affectionate to him. Thus he arranged to fulfill my desire.

Related values
Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Arjava (Simplicity / Straightforwardness)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Kritajnata (Gratitude)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Satya (Truthfulness)Shaucha (Cleanliness / Purity)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
My father, Bṛhatsena, compassionate to his daughter, arranged to fulfill my desire. A parent's deep love sometimes simply arranges what their child longs for — without questioning the longing.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my parenting (or my receiving of parenting) is the desire of the heart honored rather than questioned?
  • What request of a loved one have I tried too hard to redirect?

A father who can read his daughter's heart does not need to be told. Bṛhatsena saw where Lakṣmaṇā's mind had gone and quietly built the bridge — arranged a svayaṁvara whose test only Kṛṣṇa could pass. Vatsala fathers do this in every yuga: align the world's machinery so the heart's already-made choice can stand publicly.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.19

↗
यथा स्वयंवरे राज्ञि मत्स्य: पार्थेप्सया कृत: । अयं तु बहिराच्छन्नो द‍ृश्यते स जले परम् ॥ १९ ॥
yathā svayaṁ-vare rājñi
[yathaa svayam-vare raajni]
matsyaḥ pārthepsayā kṛtaḥ
[matsyah paarthepsayaa kritah]
ayaṁ tu bahir ācchanno
[ayam tu bahir aachchanno]
dṛśyate sa jale param
[drishyate sa jale param]
yathā — just as svayam - vare — in (your) svayaṁvara ceremony rājñi — O Queen matsyaḥ — a fish pārtha — Arjuna īpsayā — with the desire of obtaining kṛtaḥ — made (into a target) ayam — this (fish) tu — however bahiḥ — outwardly ācchannaḥ — covered dṛśyate — was seen saḥ — it jale — in water param — only .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
yathā svayaṁ-vare rājñi
yathā
just as
svayam - vare
in (your) svayaṁvara ceremony
rājñi
O Queen
matsyaḥ pārthepsayā kṛtaḥ
matsyaḥ
a fish
pārtha
Arjuna
īpsayā
with the desire of obtaining
kṛtaḥ
made (into a target)
ayaṁ tu bahir ācchanno
ayam
this (fish)
tu
however
bahiḥ
outwardly
ācchannaḥ
covered
dṛśyate sa jale param
dṛśyate
was seen
saḥ
it
jale
in water
param
only .
  • matsyaḥ — fish
    Matsya — the species used as svayaṁvara target. Also the name of the first Avatāra. The doubled resonance is intentional: piercing matsya for marriage is small-scale prefiguration of recognizing Matsya-Avatāra at the cosmic level.
  • pārtha - īpsayā — with the desire of obtaining Arjuna
    Pārtha (son of Pṛthā, i.e., Arjuna) + īpsā (desire). The chapter explicitly references Draupadī's own marriage in the body of Lakṣmaṇā's narration — the queens are talking with their friend, not lecturing.
  • ācchannaḥ — covered
    Past participle of ā + √chad — to cover. The fish was concealed. Gauḍīya commentators read the concealment as deliberate testing of inner vision: the Lord too is ācchanna to ordinary sight, visible only by reflection in pure hearts.
  • dṛśyate — was seen
    Passive present of √dṛś — to see. The verb whose subject is only the reflection, not the fish itself. Gauḍīya parallel: in saṁsāra what is dṛśyate is only the ābhāsa; the satya is hidden. Only Bhagavān, who is both the satya and the one who hides it, can pierce.
  • rājñi — O Queen
    Vocative of rājñī. Lakṣmaṇā addresses Draupadī by her formal title throughout — a sister-queen's protocol. The intimacy of bhakti does not collapse the courtesy of rāja-bhāṣā.
Just as a fish was used as a target in your svayaṁvara ceremony, O Queen, to assure that you would obtain Arjuna as your husband, so a fish was also used in my ceremony. In my case, however, it was concealed on all sides, and only its reflection could be seen in a pot of water below.

Arjuna is famous as the most expert bowman. Why, then, could he not hit the fish target at Śrīmatī Lakṣmaṇā’s svayaṁvara ceremony just as he had done once before to win Draupadī? Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī explains: The target at Draupadī’s svayaṁvara had been covered only partially, so that a marksman could see it if he looked straight up the pillar on which it was placed. To shoot Lakṣmaṇā’s target, however, it was necessary to aim by looking up and down at the same time, an impossible feat for any mortal. Therefore only Kṛṣṇa could strike the target.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just as a fish was used as a target in your svayaṁ-vara ceremony, O Queen, to assure that you would obtain Arjuna as your husband, so a fish was also used in my ceremony. In my case, however, it was concealed on all sides, and only its reflection could be seen in a pot of water below.
Commentary

They, with hopes of attaining me (mad dhiyah), took up the bow with the arrow in that assembly (parsadi).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

She describes the method. As (yathā) your father arranged for the test, so my father arranged in a similar way. As the fish was pierced Arjuna’s arrow (pārtheṣuṇā instead of pārthepṣayā), so the fish was pierced by Kṛṣṇa’s arrow. Though the fish could be seen by glancing upwards from the base of the pillar, though it could be seen, from far away one had to pierce a covering in order to pierce the fish. It was made more difficult to locate the fish because it rotated. But it was made more difficult to pierce by my father. The target could not be directly seen but only by a reflection in the water. The pillar was in the middle of water and one had to approach the column by going through water. One could not determine the whereabouts of the target before looking into the water.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

She describes the method. As (yathā) your father arranged for the test, so my father arranged in a similar way. But there was a great difference. The fish (ayam) was placed along with the bow and arrow so that it was very difficult to pierce. Or what was arranged by your father (ayam) was difficult to detect, visible on top of a pillar above the water. This was arranged by my father. The fish could be seen in the water and not outside.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
A fish target was set, concealed on all sides, visible only as reflection in water below. Some tests are designed to reveal who can hit a target seen only indirectly; clarity by reflection is its own discipline.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I asked to act on something I can only see indirectly?
  • What disciplines train me to read reflection accurately?

Bṛhatsena did not place the fish openly above, as Drupada had at Draupadī's svayaṁvara; he hid the fish from sight and put only its reflection in a pot of water below. Now the suitor must read the inverted image and shoot the unseen target. It is a sūtra for bhakti itself: the Lord is not visible directly; aim at the reflection in the still water of a pure heart.

Draupadī's own svayaṁvara

At her father Drupada's svayaṁvara, Draupadī's hand was won by piercing a revolving fish-target while looking only at its reflection in oil below. Karṇa, Bhīṣma's grand-students, and all the assembled kings had tried; only Arjuna, disguised as a brāhmaṇa, succeeded.

Lakṣmaṇā here addresses Draupadī by referencing that very ceremony — pārtha-īpsayā, 'with the desire of obtaining Arjuna.' Her own contest was patterned on Draupadī's. The chapter's storytelling thus folds in on itself: one queen's marriage-story uses another queen's marriage as its frame of reference.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.20

↗
श्रुत्वैतत् सर्वतो भूपा आययुर्मत्पितु: पुरम् । सर्वास्‍त्रशस्‍त्रतत्त्वज्ञा: सोपाध्याया: सहस्रश: ॥ २० ॥
śrutvaitat sarvato bhū-pā
[shrutvaitat sarvato bhoo-paa]
āyayur mat-pituḥ puram
[aayayur mat-pituh puram]
sarvāstra-śastra-tattva-jñāḥ
[sarvaastra-shastra-tattva-jnaah]
sopādhyāyāḥ sahasraśaḥ
[sopaadhyaayaah sahasrashah]
śrutvā — hearing etat — of this sarvataḥ — from everywhere bhū - pāḥ — kings āyayuḥ — came mat — my pituḥ — of the father puram — to the city sarva — all astra — concerning weapons shot as arrows śastra — and other weapons tattva — of the science jñāḥ — expert knowers sa — along with upādhyāyāḥ — their teachers sahasraśaḥ — by the thousands .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrutvaitat sarvato bhū-pā
śrutvā
hearing
etat
of this
sarvataḥ
from everywhere
bhū - pāḥ
kings
āyayur mat-pituḥ puram
āyayuḥ
came
mat
my
pituḥ
of the father
puram
to the city
sarvāstra-śastra-tattva-jñāḥ
sarva
all
astra
concerning weapons shot as arrows
śastra
and other weapons
tattva
of the science
jñāḥ
expert knowers
sopādhyāyāḥ sahasraśaḥ
sa
along with
upādhyāyāḥ
their teachers
sahasraśaḥ
by the thousands .
  • sarva - astra - śastra - tattva - jñāḥ — expert knowers of all weapons-science
    Sarva (all) + astra (projectile weapons) + śastra (hand-held weapons) + tattva (essence) + jña (knower). Five-word compound establishing the suitors' competence. The verse loads up qualifications precisely so their failure can be felt.
  • upādhyāyāḥ — their teachers
    Upādhyāya — preceptor, instructor. The kings come with their gurus. Not even teacher-backed expertise will pierce the hidden fish — Gauḍīya implication: technical śāstric knowledge without bhakti cannot reach the Lord.
  • sahasraśaḥ — by the thousands
    Adverbial — 'thousand-wise'. Quantity emphasized: the contest was no obscure provincial affair. The whole kṣatriya world arrived.
  • bhū - pāḥ — earth-protectors (kings)
    Bhū (earth) + pā (protector). The standard Sanskrit term for kings. Gauḍīya texts note the irony: bhū-pas come to protect their own claims to the bride, but only Bhagavān is finally the bhū-pa of all the earth, and the bride was always His.
  • puram — city
    Pura — city, fortress. Bṛhatsena's city becomes for these days the assembly-ground of every confident archer in the land. The word will be picked up at verse 36 (purīm — His own city, Dvārakā) — the failed suitors came to Bṛhatsena's pura; the bride was finally taken to Kṛṣṇa's purī.
Hearing of this, thousands of kings expert in shooting arrows and in wielding other weapons converged from all directions on my father’s city, accompanied by their military teachers.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Hearing of this, thousands of kings expert in shooting arrows and in wielding other weapons converged from all directions on my father's city, accompanied by their military teachers.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Hearing about this amazing and enticing challenge, many kings came.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Kings came from all states with their teachers of military arts, since the method of winning was difficult to conceive.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Thousands of kings expert in shooting arrived with their military teachers. Significant tests draw significant competitors; the Lord does not enter unworthy contests.
Reflection Questions
  • What spiritual 'contest' am I in that I have underestimated the seriousness of?
  • How do I prepare with the level of training the moment deserves?

When news of an impossible contest spreads, every archer in the land believes himself capable; thousands converged on Bṛhatsena's city, each with his teacher in tow. The verse is the moment before failure becomes visible: the room is full of confident men. The same scene replays in every age in different garments — confident souls converging on a target Bhagavān has hidden for His own bride.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.21

↗
पित्रा सम्पूजिता: सर्वे यथावीर्यं यथावय: । आददु: सशरं चापं वेद्धुं पर्षदि मद्धिय: ॥ २१ ॥
pitrā sampūjitāḥ sarve
[pitraa sampoojitaah sarve]
yathā-vīryaṁ yathā-vayaḥ
[yathaa-veeryam yathaa-vayah]
ādaduḥ sa-śaraṁ cāpaṁ
[aadaduh sa-sharam chaapam]
veddhuṁ parṣadi mad-dhiyaḥ
[veddhum parshadi mad-dhiyah]
pitrā — by my father sampūjitāḥ — fully honored sarve — all of them yathā — according to vīryam — strength yathā — according to vayaḥ — age ādaduḥ — they took up sa — with śaram — arrows cāpam — the bow veddhum — to pierce (the target) parṣadi — in the assembly mat — (fixed) upon me dhiyaḥ — whose minds .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pitrā sampūjitāḥ sarve
pitrā
by my father
sampūjitāḥ
fully honored
sarve
all of them
yathā-vīryaṁ yathā-vayaḥ
yathā
according to
vīryam
strength
yathā
according to
vayaḥ
age
ādaduḥ sa-śaraṁ cāpaṁ
ādaduḥ
they took up
sa
with
śaram
arrows
cāpam
the bow
veddhuṁ parṣadi mad-dhiyaḥ
veddhum
to pierce (the target)
parṣadi
in the assembly
mat
(fixed) upon me
dhiyaḥ
whose minds .
  • vīryam — strength, prowess
    Vīrya — vital force, semen, heroic capacity. The Bhāgavatam uses vīrya broadly: physical strength, spiritual potency, generative power. Each king was ranked by his vīrya; none of these vīryas would prove sufficient.
  • vayaḥ — age, life-stage
    Vayas — span of life, age. Vedic etiquette honors elders first. The doubled measure (vīryam + vayaḥ) names the two axes of kṣatriya rank — physical force and accumulated experience.
  • ādaduḥ — they took up
    Aorist of ā + √dā — to take, accept. The bow is taken up: the moment of commitment. Gauḍīya parallel: bhakti also requires a moment of ādāna — taking up the practice — before any siddhi appears.
  • veddhum — to pierce
    Infinitive of √vyadh — to pierce, to wound. The verb appears in many Upaniṣadic and tantric contexts as 'piercing the heart of the mantra'. Here it remains literal — pierce the fish — but the resonance carries.
  • mat - dhiyaḥ — whose minds were on me
    Mat (me) + dhī (intelligence). The suitors took up the bow with their dhī fixed on Lakṣmaṇā. Gauḍīya reading: the dhī determines the act's destination. Their dhī was on a woman; only Kṛṣṇa's dhī was on Lakṣmī's iṣṭa-bhāva.
My father properly honored each king according to his strength and seniority. Then those whose minds were fixed on me took up the bow and arrow and one by one tried to pierce the target in the midst of the assembly.

According to the ācāryas, only those kings who were extremely intent on winning the hand of the princess even dared try to shoot the target.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My father properly honored each king according to his strength and seniority. Then those whose minds were fixed on me took up the bow and arrow and one by one tried to pierce the target in the midst of the assembly.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The special bow was placed there by my father. With pride they tried to pierce the fish. They made great efforts to pierce the fish in order to obtain me (mad-dhiyaḥ).

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

They were all properly honored by my father—according to courage and years. All were satisfied. With pride they tried to pierce the fish. They made great efforts to pierce the fish in the assembly in order to obtain me (mad-dhiyaḥ). Or they thought of me in the assembly. Thus they were not qualified because of their impudence.

Related values
Mardava (Gentleness)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Kartavya (Duty / Responsibility)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Titiksha (Forbearance / Endurance)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Satya (Truthfulness)Udyama (Industriousness / Effort)Achapalya (Steadiness / Non-fickleness)Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)Shraddha (Faith / Reverence)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
My father honored each king by strength and seniority. Those with minds fixed on me took the bow. Right order of honor; only the genuinely committed step forward.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I called to step forward only if my mind is truly fixed?
  • How do I tell the difference between honoring an opportunity and being ready to attempt it?

Bṛhatsena's protocol is precise: each king is honored according to his vīrya and his vayaḥ, then offered the bow. Only after worldly courtesy is satisfied does the trial begin. The same order governs spiritual life — honor the kṣatriya-protocols of dharma, then take up the bow whose only target is the Lord's own arrangement.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.22

↗
आदाय व्यसृजन् केचित् सज्यं कर्तुमनीश्वरा: । आकोष्ठं ज्यां समुत्कृष्य पेतुरेकेऽमुना हता: ॥ २२ ॥
ādāya vyasṛjan kecit
[aadaaya vyasrijan kechit]
sajyaṁ kartum anīśvarāḥ
[sajyam kartum aneeshvaraah]
ā-koṣṭhaṁ jyāṁ samutkṛṣya
[aa-koshtham jyaam samutkrishya]
petur eke ’munāhatāḥ
[petur eke ’munaahataah]
ādāya — after picking up vyasṛjan — let go kecit — some of them sajyam — strung kartum — to make it anīśvarāḥ — unable ā - koṣṭham — up to the tip (of the bow) jyām — the bowstring samutkṛṣya — having pulled petuḥ — fell down eke — some amunā — by it (the bow) hatāḥ — hit .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ādāya vyasṛjan kecit
ādāya
after picking up
vyasṛjan
let go
kecit
some of them
sajyaṁ kartum anīśvarāḥ
sajyam
strung
kartum
to make it
anīśvarāḥ
unable
ā - koṣṭham
up to the tip (of the bow)
ā-koṣṭhaṁ jyāṁ samutkṛṣya
jyām
the bowstring
samutkṛṣya
having pulled
petur eke ’munāhatāḥ
petuḥ
fell down
eke
some
amunā
by it (the bow)
hatāḥ
hit .
  • sajyam kartum anīśvarāḥ — unable to make it strung
    Sajyam (strung) + kartum (to do) + anīśvarāḥ (unable). The Sanskrit elegance: those who could not perform the act of stringing are called an-īśvara — without the power, without the lordship. Gauḍīya echo: only Īśvara (Kṛṣṇa) is fully an-an-īśvara — fully capable.
  • vyasṛjan — they let go, abandoned
    Vi + √sṛj — to release, throw aside. The first failure: they put down the bow before trying. Spiritually, the soul that abandons sādhana before attempting it.
  • samutkṛṣya — having drawn forcibly
    Sam (fully) + ut (up) + √kṛṣ (to drag). The second class of failures: they pulled but the bow's recoil knocked them down. The samutkṛṣya is intense effort — but effort alone, without the Lord's grace on the act, ends face-down.
  • petuḥ — they fell
    Perfect of √pat — to fall. The word is also used for fallen souls (patita). The verse's vocabulary keeps slipping between archery and spiritual failure.
  • hatāḥ — struck
    Past participle of √han — to strike. The bow that was supposed to be their instrument struck them down. Gauḍīya doctrine: sādhana attempted without bhakti can itself become the rod of correction.
Some of them picked up the bow but could not string it, and so they threw it aside in frustration. Some managed to pull the bowstring toward the tip of the bow, only to have the bow spring back and knock them to the ground.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Some of them picked up the bow but could not string it, and so they threw it aside in frustration. Some managed to pull the bowstring toward the tip of the bow, only to have the bow spring back and knock them to the ground.
Commentary

Some were able to pull the string to the tip of the bow, but being unable to tie it, were hit by the bow and fell to the ground.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Some strong warriors managed to pull the string from one tip of the bow to the other tip but were struck by the bow since they were unable to string it. The bow recoiled and hit them.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Some weak persons picked up the bow, but immediately gave it up because they were incapable. Some strong warriors managed to pull the string from one tip of the bow to the other tip but were struck by the bow since they were unable to string it. The bow recoiled and hit them.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Some could not even string the bow; others were knocked to the ground by it. Public attempts often reveal limits we did not know we had; embarrassment is the price of trying.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could my own public attempt at something reveal limits I would rather not know?
  • Could I welcome that knowledge as part of growth?

The bow itself is the first sifter. Some cannot even string it and throw it down in shame; others string it but the recoil throws them to the ground. Before the fish is reached, the instrument has already weeded out the unfit. So in bhakti: many cannot pick up the sādhana, many pick it up but are thrown by the first kickback. The unbroken stance comes later.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.23

↗
सज्यं कृत्वापरे वीरा मागधाम्बष्ठचेदिपा: । भीमो दुर्योधन: कर्णो नाविदंस्तदवस्थितिम् ॥ २३ ॥
sajyaṁ kṛtvāpare vīrā
[sajyam kritvaapare veeraa]
māgadhāmbaṣṭha-cedipāḥ
[maagadhaambashtha-chedipaah]
bhīmo duryodhanaḥ karṇo
[bheemo duryodhanah karno]
nāvidaṁs tad-avasthitim
[naavidams tad-avasthitim]
sajyam — strung kṛtvā — making (the bow) apare — other vīrāḥ — heroes māgadha — the King of Magadha (Jarāsandha) ambaṣṭha — the King of Ambaṣṭha cedi - pāḥ — the ruler of Cedi (Śiśupāla) bhīmaḥ duryodhanaḥ karṇaḥ — Bhīma, Duryodhana and Karṇa na avidan — they could not find tad — of it (the target) avasthitim — the location .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sajyaṁ kṛtvāpare vīrā
sajyam
strung
kṛtvā
making (the bow)
apare
other
vīrāḥ
heroes
māgadhāmbaṣṭha-cedipāḥ
māgadha
the King of Magadha (Jarāsandha)
ambaṣṭha
the King of Ambaṣṭha
cedi - pāḥ
the ruler of Cedi (Śiśupāla)
bhīmo duryodhanaḥ karṇo
bhīmaḥ duryodhanaḥ karṇaḥ
Bhīma, Duryodhana and Karṇa
na avidan
they could not find
nāvidaṁs tad-avasthitim
tad
of it (the target)
avasthitim
the location .
  • bhīmaḥ duryodhanaḥ karṇaḥ — Bhīma, Duryodhana, and Karṇa
    Three of the great Mahābhārata figures listed together. The same Bhīma who is Yudhiṣṭhira's brother is here just one more failed suitor — a quiet reminder that earthly heroism does not by itself reach the Lord's bride. Even Pāṇḍava-vīra was insufficient for this svayaṁvara.
  • sajyam kṛtvā — having strung (the bow)
    Sajyam (strung) + kṛtvā (having done). Same compound as verse 22, but this time successful. The narrative climbs a step: more competent suitors, still insufficient.
  • māgadha — the King of Magadha (Jarāsandha)
    From Magadha (the kingdom). Jarāsandha — Kṛṣṇa's perennial opponent in Canto 10, finally killed by Bhīma in the Sabhā-parva at Kṛṣṇa's direction. His failure here is doctrinally significant: the same enemy of the Lord who would later be slain through Bhīma cannot find the bride's location.
  • cedi - pāḥ — the King of Cedi (Śiśupāla)
    Cedi (kingdom) + pā (protector). Śiśupāla — Rukmiṇī's intended suitor (verse 8), Kṛṣṇa's repeated insulter, ultimately killed by Kṛṣṇa's cakra at Yudhiṣṭhira's rājasūya. Two of the three Vaikuṇṭha-gatekeepers' final birth. He cannot find the target here either.
  • na avidan — they did not find
    Na (not) + avidan (found). The verb is the same root as veda — knowledge. They did not find / they did not know. The verse is technically about archery and theologically about jñāna: even the strong cannot find the Lord's hidden target without His grace.
A few heroes — namely Jarāsandha, Śiśupāla, Bhīma, Duryodhana, Karṇa and the King of Ambaṣṭha — succeeded in stringing the bow, but none of them could find the target.

These kings were very strong physically, but they were not skillful enough to find the target.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
A few heroes—namely Jarāsandha, Śiśupāla, Bhīma, Duryodhana, Karṇa and the King of Ambaṣṭha—succeeded in stringing the bow, but none of them could find the target.
Commentary

The king of Ambastha , Jarasandha and others had the power to string the bow, but could not detect the fish.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Ambaṣṭha refers to the king of that region.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Some were especially capable (vīrāḥ). Ambaṣṭha refers to the king of that region. Cedipaḥ means Śiśupāla.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Jarāsandha, Śiśupāla, Bhīma, Duryodhana, Karṇa, the King of Ambaṣṭha — strong enough to string the bow, but none could find the target. Strength without precision is not yet skill.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I strong but imprecise?
  • What practice would add the precision my strength lacks?

A small elite — Jarāsandha, Śiśupāla, Bhīma, Duryodhana, Karṇa, the King of Ambaṣṭha — could at least string the bow. The bow opened to them; the fish did not. The verse is a roll-call of names that will all stand opposite Kṛṣṇa on the Kurukṣetra battlefield or earlier; even their partial competence at the bow could not buy them the bride. Competence stops at the doorstep of the actual target.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.24

↗
मत्स्याभासं जले वीक्ष्य ज्ञात्वा च तदवस्थितिम् । पार्थो यत्तोऽसृजद् बाणं नाच्छिनत् पस्पृशे परम् ॥ २४ ॥
matsyābhāsaṁ jale vīkṣya
[matsyaabhaasam jale veekshya]
jñātvā ca tad-avasthitim
[jnaatvaa cha tad-avasthitim]
pārtho yatto ’sṛjad bāṇaṁ
[paartho yatto ’srijad baanam]
nācchinat paspṛśe param
[naachchinat pasprishe param]
matsya — of the fish ābhāsam — the reflection jale — in the water vīkṣya — looking at jñātvā — knowing ca — and tat — its avasthitim — location pārthaḥ — Arjuna yattaḥ — taking careful aim asṛjat — shot bāṇam — the arrow na acchinat — he did not pierce it paspṛśe — he touched it param — only .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
matsyābhāsaṁ jale vīkṣya
matsya
of the fish
ābhāsam
the reflection
jale
in the water
vīkṣya
looking at
jñātvā ca tad-avasthitim
jñātvā
knowing
ca
and
tat
its
avasthitim
location
pārtho yatto ’sṛjad bāṇaṁ
pārthaḥ
Arjuna
yattaḥ
taking careful aim
nācchinat paspṛśe param
asṛjat
shot
bāṇam
the arrow
na acchinat
he did not pierce it
paspṛśe
he touched it
param
only .
  • ābhāsam — the reflection
    Ā + √bhās — to appear, to shine forth. Ābhāsa is also a Vedānta term for the apparent (as opposed to real) — Gauḍīya commentators are alive to the resonance: even Arjuna, working only from ābhāsa, could touch but not pierce; only Kṛṣṇa, who is the satya itself, can pierce.
  • yattaḥ — taking careful aim
    Past participle of √yat — to be intent, controlled. Arjuna is not careless here; he is yattaḥ — fully concentrated. The failure is not lack of effort but the Lord's reservation.
  • na acchinat — he did not pierce
    Na (not) + acchinat (cut, pierced). The verse's central negation. The very word that will be inverted in verse 25-26 (chittvā — having pierced) when Kṛṣṇa acts.
  • paspṛśe — he touched
    Perfect of √spṛś — to touch. Arjuna's arrow only touched. Gauḍīya note: the touch was real — Arjuna is a real bhakta — but the piercing is reserved for Bhagavān Himself.
  • param — only
    Param — 'only, merely'. The word that turns Arjuna's near-miss into a near-miss: he touched, but only touched. Even great souls' efforts can be 'only' — a single syllable that opens the door for Bhagavān to step through.
Then Arjuna looked at the reflection of the fish in the water and determined its position. When he carefully shot his arrow at it, however, he did not pierce the target but merely grazed it.

According to the explanation of Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī, Arjuna was more expert a marksman than the other kings, but his physical strength was not adequate to the task of shooting it with perfect accuracy.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Then Arjuna looked at the reflection of the fish in the water and determined its position. When he carefully shot his arrow at it, however, he did not pierce the target but merely grazed it.
Commentary

With great concentration Arjuna was able to detect the target in the reflection in the water (viskya), and carefully released his arrow. His arrow touched the fish but did not pierce it in the center. This was known because of the arrow mark on the side of the fish. Some say that he even though he was able to understand the location of the target, he cold not pierce it become he lacked the strength.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With great concentration (vi), constantly, Arjuna saw (īkṣya) the fish reflected in the water. He just touched the fish. The arrow touched the fish in one spot but not in the center. One could understand that the arrow touched the fish because there was a mark left by the arrow. Arjuna did this on purpose in order to spread the glories of the Lord.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With great concentration (vi), constantly, Arjuna saw (īkṣya) the fish reflected in the water. He just touched the fish. Knowing he was not capable, Arjuna did this in order to spread the glories of the Lord.

Concepts
Jiva
Arjuna shot at the reflection, determined the position, and merely grazed it. Even the world's best marksman could not complete this task by skill alone; some thresholds require something more.
Reflection Questions
  • What threshold in my life will not yield to skill alone?
  • What additional quality might be needed?

Arjuna — the same Arjuna who pierced Draupadī's fish — looked at the reflection, took careful aim, and grazed the fish. The arrow touched but did not pierce. The world's greatest archer's near-miss is the verse's most poignant beat: even the closest natural ally of Kṛṣṇa cannot do this work without Him. Pārtha's bow needs Pārtha-sārathi.

Arjuna at Draupadī's svayaṁvara

In the Mahābhārata's Ādi-parva, Arjuna disguised as a brāhmaṇa shot the revolving fish at Drupada's svayaṁvara by sighting only its reflection in oil below, and won Draupadī.

Here, the same Arjuna — confident, expert, victorious before — looks at Lakṣmaṇā's reflection, takes aim, shoots, and merely grazes. The text does not explain why; Gauḍīya commentators read it as the Lord's reservation of this particular svayaṁvara for Himself. Even Arjuna, the model bhakta-warrior, must step aside when Kṛṣṇa's own bride is the prize. The friendship deepens by yielding.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.25-26

↗
राजन्येषु निवृत्तेषु भग्नमानेषु मानिषु । भगवान् धनुरादाय सज्यं कृत्वाथ लीलया ॥ २५ ॥ तस्मिन् सन्धाय विशिखं मत्स्यं वीक्ष्य सकृज्जले । छित्त्वेषुणापातयत्तं सूर्ये चाभिजिति स्थिते ॥ २६ ॥
rājanyeṣu nivṛtteṣu
[raajanyeshu nivritteshu]
bhagna-māneṣu māniṣu
[bhagna-maaneshu maanishu]
bhagavān dhanur ādāya
[bhagavaan dhanur aadaaya]
sajyaṁ kṛtvātha līlayā
[sajyam kritvaatha leelayaa]
tasmin sandhāya viśikhaṁ
[tasmin sandhaaya vishikham]
matsyaṁ vīkṣya sakṛj jale
[matsyam veekshya sakrij jale]
chittveṣuṇāpātayat taṁ
[chittveshunaapaatayat tam]
sūrye cābhijiti sthite
[soorye chaabhijiti sthite]
rājanyeṣu — when the kings nivṛtteṣu — had given up bhagna — defeated māneṣu — whose pride māniṣu — proud bhagavān — the Supreme Lord dhanuḥ — the bow ādāya — taking up sajyam kṛtvā — stringing it atha — then līlayā — as play tasmin — onto it sandhāya — fixing viśikham — the arrow matsyam — the fish vīkṣya — looking at sakṛt — only once jale — in the water chittvā — piercing iṣuṇā — with the arrow apātayat — He made fall tam — it sūrye — when the sun ca — and abhijite — in the constellation Abhijit sthite — situated .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rājanyeṣu nivṛtteṣu
rājanyeṣu
when the kings
nivṛtteṣu
had given up
bhagna-māneṣu māniṣu
bhagna
defeated
māneṣu
whose pride
māniṣu
proud
bhagavān dhanur ādāya
bhagavān
the Supreme Lord
dhanuḥ
the bow
ādāya
taking up
sajyaṁ kṛtvātha līlayā
sajyam kṛtvā
stringing it
atha
then
līlayā
as play
tasmin sandhāya viśikhaṁ
tasmin
onto it
sandhāya
fixing
viśikham
the arrow
matsyaṁ vīkṣya sakṛj jale
matsyam
the fish
vīkṣya
looking at
sakṛt
only once
jale
in the water
chittveṣuṇāpātayat taṁ
chittvā
piercing
sūrye cābhijiti sthite
iṣuṇā
with the arrow
apātayat
He made fall
tam
it
sūrye
when the sun
ca
and
abhijite
in the constellation Abhijit
sthite
situated .
  • līlayā — as play
    Līlā in instrumental — 'by means of play'. The single word that names Gauḍīya doctrine: everything Bhagavān does is līlā, free play not labor. The kings strained and failed; Kṛṣṇa played and succeeded. Effort is not the door; līlā is.
  • sakṛt — only once
    Sakṛt — one time. Where Arjuna took careful aim and missed, Kṛṣṇa glances once and pierces. The Lord does not rehearse; one look is sufficient. Gauḍīya doctrine of the Lord's instantaneous all-seeing.
  • abhijite sthite — when (the sun) was in Abhijit
    Abhijit (literally 'all-conquering') — a nakṣatra particularly auspicious for victory. Gauḍīya jyotiṣa-commentary holds that Kṛṣṇa's act is staged in cosmic alignment with the very meaning of Abhijit: the Conqueror conquering in the Conqueror's hour.
  • bhagna - māneṣu māniṣu — when the proud (kings) had their pride broken
    Bhagna (broken) + māna (pride) + māni (proud). The pride must break before Bhagavān acts. Gauḍīya humility-doctrine: as long as the kṣatriya holds his māna, the bow cannot find him; Bhagavān picks up the bow only when every claimant has set his māna down.
  • chittvā iṣuṇā — piercing with the arrow
    Chittvā (having cut) + iṣu (arrow). The exact opposite of Arjuna's na acchinat. The single arrow that the strongest had failed to launch effectively becomes, in the Lord's hand, a finished act.
After all the arrogant kings had given up, their pride broken, the Supreme Personality of Godhead picked up the bow, easily strung it and then fixed His arrow upon it. As the sun stood in the constellation Abhijit, He looked at the fish in the water only once and then pierced it with the arrow, knocking it to the ground.

Each day the sun passes once through the lunar constellation Abhijit, marking the period most auspicious for victory. As pointed out by Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, on this particular day the muhūrta of Abhijit coincided with high noon, further emphasizing Lord Kṛṣṇa’s greatness by making the target all the more difficult to see.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
After all the arrogant kings had given up, their pride broken, the Supreme Personality of Godhead picked up the bow, easily strung it and then fixed His arrow upon it. As the sun stood in the constellation Abhijit, He looked at the fish in the water only once and then pierced it with the arrow, knocking it to the ground.
Commentary

Krsna pierced the fish at noon (abhijite). In spite of the fact that the fish was difficult to detect because the sun was overhead, Krsna pierced it.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

He looked at the fish playfully (vi—īkṣya). He pierced the fish at noon (abhijiti sthiti). With the sun high in the sky it was harder to aim.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The proud kings (māniṣu) had their pride broken. The Lord, possessing all powers (bhagavān), quickly strung the bow. He looked at the fish playfully (vi—īkṣya). He pierced the fish at noon (abhijiti sthiti). With the sun high in the sky it was harder to aim.

Concepts
Jiva
At the Abhijit muhūrta, Kṛṣṇa strung the bow, looked at the reflection once, and pierced the target. Auspicious timing plus the Lord's effortless competence accomplishes what no one else could.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I trying to force a result outside of auspicious timing?
  • What would it look like to let the Lord do what only He can?

When every confident suitor has been broken — and even Arjuna has merely grazed — Bhagavān picks up the bow as one picks up a child's toy, strings it līlayā, looks at the water just once, and pierces. The cosmic hour is precise: the sun in Abhijit, the constellation of invincible victory. The same Bhagavān who refused to be hurried on Yamunā's bank with Kālindī moves here in a single glance.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.27

↗
दिवि दुन्दुभयो नेदुर्जयशब्दयुता भुवि । देवाश्च कुसुमासारान् मुमुचुर्हर्षविह्वला: ॥ २७ ॥
divi dundubhayo nedur
[divi dundubhayo nedur]
jaya-śabda-yutā bhuvi
[jaya-shabda-yutaa bhuvi]
devāś ca kusumāsārān
[devaash cha kusumaasaaraan]
mumucur harṣa-vihvalāḥ
[mumuchur harsha-vihvalaah]
divi — in the sky dundubhayaḥ — kettledrums neduḥ — resounded jaya — “victory” śabda — the sound yutāḥ — together with bhuvi — on the earth devāḥ — demigods ca — and kusuma — of flowers āsārān — torrents mumucuḥ — released harṣa — with joy vihvalāḥ — overwhelmed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
divi dundubhayo nedur
divi
in the sky
dundubhayaḥ
kettledrums
neduḥ
resounded
jaya-śabda-yutā bhuvi
jaya
“victory”
śabda
the sound
yutāḥ
together with
bhuvi
on the earth
devāś ca kusumāsārān
devāḥ
demigods
ca
and
kusuma
of flowers
āsārān
torrents
mumucur harṣa-vihvalāḥ
mumucuḥ
released
harṣa
with joy
vihvalāḥ
overwhelmed .
  • dundubhayaḥ — kettledrums
    Dundubhi — the celestial drum sounded at all great Vedic moments: gods' victories, royal coronations, the Lord's līlās. The drum's sound from divi establishes the deva-loka's blessing on the union.
  • jaya - śabda — the sound 'victory'
    Jaya (victory) + śabda (sound). The single Sanskrit cry that runs through the entire Bhāgavatam at moments of līlā: jaya, jaya. Gauḍīya kīrtana inherits this; every saṅkīrtana is an echo of dvāpara's jaya-śabda.
  • kusuma - āsārān — torrents of flowers
    Kusuma (flower) + āsāra (downpour). The standard celestial response — Brahmā showering flowers when Kṛṣṇa lifts Govardhana, the gods showering flowers at Rāma's coronation. Heaven has no other gift it can offer: it gives flowers.
  • harṣa - vihvalāḥ — overwhelmed with joy
    Harṣa (joy) + vihvala (overwhelmed). The gods themselves are tossed by their own ānanda. Gauḍīya rasa-theory: even demigods experience secondary bhāva at the Lord's victories, though their stable rasa is reverence.
  • devāḥ — demigods
    Deva — the heavenly administrators. They do not marry Lakṣmaṇā themselves (verse 17: she rejected the loka-pās), but they bless the bride who saw past them to Mukunda. Their flower-rain is the higher beings' acknowledgement that the Lord's bride chose rightly.
Kettledrums resounded in the sky, and on the earth people shouted “Jaya! Jaya!” Overjoyed, demigods showered flowers.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Kettledrums resounded in the sky, and on the earth people shouted " Jaya! Jaya!" Overjoyed, demigods showered flowers.
Commentary

Remembering her joy on that occasion she describes her choosing Krsna at that time in two verses. She entered with feet adorned with anklets which jingled, wearing two pieces of silk cloth tied by a belt.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Simultaneously people on earth shouted “Victory!” and devatās in the sky sounded drums.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The devatās shouted “Jaya jaya” on earth released flowers. Or on earth the drums sounded and people shouted “Jaya jaya.”

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Kettledrums sounded, people shouted 'Jaya!', demigods showered flowers. The right victory triggers celebration across multiple worlds. We are not the only audience.
Reflection Questions
  • What recent victory of mine deserves wider rejoicing than I have allowed?
  • How could I let the multiple worlds' applause in?

The cosmos itself recognizes the moment: drums sound in heaven, the people shout victory below, demigods empty their petal-baskets. The same celestial response that greets every great līlā — the gopīs' first dance, Govardhana lifted, the demons slain — pours down here too. The marriage is being ratified above before the bride has even garlanded.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.28

↗
तद् रङ्गमाविशमहं कलनूपुराभ्यां पद्‍भ्यां प्रगृह्य कनकोज्ज्वलरत्नमालाम् । नूत्ने निवीय परिधाय च कौशिकाग्र्‍ये सव्रीडहासवदना कवरीधृतस्रक् ॥ २८ ॥
tad raṅgam āviśam ahaṁ kala-nūpurābhyāṁ
[tad rangam aavisham aham kala-noopuraabhyaam]
padbhyāṁ pragṛhya kanakoijvala-ratna-mālām
[padbhyaam pragrihya kanakoijvala-ratna-maalaam]
nūtne nivīya paridhāya ca kauśikāgrye
[nootne niveeya paridhaaya cha kaushikaagrye]
sa-vrīḍa-hāsa-vadanā kavarī-dhṛta-srak
[sa-vreeda-haasa-vadanaa kavaree-dhrita-srak]
tat — then raṅgam — the arena āviśam — entered aham — I kala — gently sounding nūpurābhyām — having ankle bells padbhyām — with feet pragṛhya — holding kanaka — of gold ujjvala — brilliant ratna — with jewels mālām — a necklace nūtne — new nivīya — having tied with a belt paridhāya — wearing ca — and kauśika — a pair of silk garments agrye — excellent sa - vrīḍa — shy hāsa — with a smile vadanā — my face kavarī — on the locks of my hair dhṛta — carrying srak — a wreath of flowers .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tad raṅgam āviśam ahaṁ kala-nūpurābhyāṁ
tat
then
raṅgam
the arena
āviśam
entered
aham
I
kala
gently sounding
nūpurābhyām
having ankle bells
padbhyāṁ pragṛhya kanakoijvala-ratna-mālām
padbhyām
with feet
pragṛhya
holding
kanaka
of gold
ujjvala
brilliant
ratna
with jewels
mālām
a necklace
nūtne nivīya paridhāya ca kauśikāgrye
nūtne
new
nivīya
having tied with a belt
paridhāya
wearing
ca
and
kauśika
a pair of silk garments
agrye
excellent
sa-vrīḍa-hāsa-vadanā kavarī-dhṛta-srak
sa - vrīḍa
shy
hāsa
with a smile
vadanā
my face
kavarī
on the locks of my hair
dhṛta
carrying
srak
a wreath of flowers .
  • kala - nūpurābhyām — having sweetly sounding ankle-bells
    Kala (gentle, melodic) + nūpura (anklet) + dual. The doubled instrumental — both feet sounding. Gauḍīya kīrtana repeatedly uses nūpura imagery for Rādhārāṇī's approach; here it is Lakṣmaṇā but the rasa-vocabulary is identical.
  • kanaka - ujjvala - ratna - mālām — a necklace brilliant with gold and jewels
    Kanaka (gold) + ujjvala (brilliant) + ratna (jewel) + mālā (garland). The mālā she will place around Kṛṣṇa's neck in the next verse. The garland is the active instrument of choosing — Gauḍīya wedding-imagery's central object.
  • kauśika - agrye — in the finest silk
    Kauśika (silk) + agrya (foremost). Silk fabrics held first place among Vedic textiles. The detail places her in the highest bridal register — not so the listener admires the dress, but so that the dress, garland, and Lord's neck all align.
  • sa - vrīḍa - hāsa — with a shy smile
    Sa (with) + vrīḍā (shyness, modesty) + hāsa (smile). Vrīḍā is one of the eight sāttvika-bhāvas in Gauḍīya rasa-theory — bashfulness as a sign of approaching prema. The smile breaking through the shyness is the bhāva itself in motion.
  • kavarī - dhṛta - srak — (her) hair-braid bearing a flower-wreath
    Kavarī (braid) + dhṛta (held) + srak (wreath). The wreath in the hair is the bride's traditional Vedic ornament. Gauḍīya iconography of Rādhā always includes the kavarī — the long braid that Kṛṣṇa Himself sometimes plaits.
Just then I walked onto the ceremonial ground, the ankle bells on my feet gently tinkling. I was wearing new garments of the finest silk, tied with a belt, and I carried a brilliant necklace fashioned of gold and jewels. There was a shy smile on my face and a wreath of flowers in my hair.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī states that Śrī Lakṣmaṇā was so excited by remembering how she obtained the Supreme Lord that she forgot her natural shyness and went on to describe her own triumph.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just then I walked onto the ceremonial ground, the ankle bells on my feet gently tinkling. I was wearing new garments of the finest silk, tied with a belt, and I carried a brilliant necklace fashioned of gold and jewels. There was a shy smile on my face and a wreath of flowers in my hair.
Commentary

She describes how her beauty became incomparable at that time due to her extreme joy. Her cheeks were surrounded with large locks of hair and lit by her earrings.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I held with great respect (pra—gṛhya) in my hands a garland. I wore new silk cloth for the wedding. I was shy in the assembly. A smile appeared on my face because of satisfaction caused by inner bliss. This was the nature of her face, not something created at that moment.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I held with great respect (pra—gṛhya) a garland in my hands. I wore new silk cloth for the wedding. She smiled shyly in joy, having attained her desire or because special love for the Lord arose. The flowers in her hair increased her beauty.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomSeva (Service / Selfless Action)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Hrih (Modesty / Sense of Shame)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)
Related verses
I walked onto the ground in silk garments, jeweled necklace, shy smile, flowers in my hair, ankle bells tinkling. Lakṣmaṇā describes herself unselfconsciously — joy lets us speak about our own moments without false modesty.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does false modesty prevent me from telling my own story?
  • What joyful moment of mine deserves telling?

Now the bride enters. Anklets soft, silk new, jewelled necklace in hand, hair garlanded, smile shy — the verse is one long ornamental sweep so the listener can see her walking. Lakṣmaṇā paints herself the way a Gauḍīya kīrtanīyā paints Rādhā entering Yāvaṭa: every detail of dress, every step. Bhakti notices the surface because the surface is what touches the Lord.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.29

↗
उन्नीय वक्त्रमुरुकुन्तलकुण्डलत्विड् गण्डस्थलं शिशिरहासकटाक्षमोक्षै: । राज्ञो निरीक्ष्य परित: शनकैर्मुरारे- रंसेऽनुरक्तहृदया निदधे स्वमालाम् ॥ २९ ॥
unnīya vaktram uru-kuntala-kuṇḍala-tviḍ-
[unneeya vaktram uru-kuntala-kundala-tvid-]
gaṇḍa-sthalaṁ śiśira-hāsa-kaṭākṣa-mokṣaiḥ
[ganda-sthalam shishira-haasa-kataaksha-mokshaih]
rājño nirīkṣya paritaḥ śanakair murārer
[raajno nireekshya paritah shanakair muraarer]
aṁse ’nurakta-hṛdayā nidadhe sva-mālām
[amse ’nurakta-hridayaa nidadhe sva-maalaam]
unnīya — lifting vaktram — my face uru — abundant kuntala — with locks of hair kuṇḍala — of earrings tviṭ — and with the effulgence gaṇḍa - sthalam — whose cheeks śiśira — cooling hāsa — with a smile kaṭa - akṣa — of sidelong glances mokṣaiḥ — and with the casting rājñaḥ — the kings nirīkṣya — looking at paritaḥ — all around śanakaiḥ — slowly murāreḥ — of Kṛṣṇa aṁse — upon the shoulder anurakta — attracted hṛdayā — whose heart nidadhe — I placed sva — my mālām — necklace .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
unnīya vaktram uru-kuntala-kuṇḍala-tviḍ-
unnīya
lifting
vaktram
my face
uru
abundant
kuntala
with locks of hair
kuṇḍala
of earrings
tviṭ
and with the effulgence
gaṇḍa-sthalaṁ śiśira-hāsa-kaṭākṣa-mokṣaiḥ
gaṇḍa - sthalam
whose cheeks
śiśira
cooling
hāsa
with a smile
kaṭa - akṣa
of sidelong glances
mokṣaiḥ
and with the casting
rājño nirīkṣya paritaḥ śanakair murārer
rājñaḥ
the kings
nirīkṣya
looking at
paritaḥ
all around
śanakaiḥ
slowly
murāreḥ
of Kṛṣṇa
aṁse ’nurakta-hṛdayā nidadhe sva-mālām
aṁse
upon the shoulder
anurakta
attracted
hṛdayā
whose heart
nidadhe
I placed
sva
my
mālām
necklace .
  • murāreḥ — of Murāri (Kṛṣṇa, enemy of Mura)
    Mura (the demon) + ari (enemy). Kṛṣṇa is named here by a name that recalls His killing of the demon Mura at Bhaumāsura's fortress (SB 10.59). Gauḍīya commentators note: the same Lord who slays demons is gentle enough to receive a bride's garland.
  • anurakta - hṛdayā — whose heart was attached
    Anu (after) + rakta (colored, attached) + hṛdaya (heart). Anurāga — coloring-after, the Gauḍīya term for prema's first ripening. The heart has taken the color of the Lord before the body has approached Him.
  • kaṭa - akṣa - mokṣaiḥ — with the casting of sidelong glances
    Kaṭa (corner) + akṣa (eye) + mokṣa (release). The sidelong glance — a sthāyī Gauḍīya iconographic element of Rādhā's interaction with Kṛṣṇa. Here used by Lakṣmaṇā but the same rasa-vocabulary.
  • śiśira - hāsa — cooling smile
    Śiśira (cool) + hāsa (smile). Her smile cools the rival kings even as it warms the Lord. Gauḍīya rasa-doctrine: one bhāva produces opposite effects in different ground.
  • śanakaiḥ — slowly
    Adverb — unhurriedly. She does not rush the garland onto Kṛṣṇa's neck. The slowness is its own statement: the choice has been made years ago at Nārada's first gītam; the hand may take its time.
I lifted my face, which was encircled by my abundant locks and effulgent from the glow of my earrings reflected from my cheeks. Smiling coolly, I glanced about. Then, looking around at all the kings, I slowly placed the necklace on the shoulder of Murāri, who had captured my heart.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
I lifted my face, which was encircled by my abundant locks and effulgent from the glow of my earrings reflected from my cheeks. Smiling coolly, I glanced about. Then, looking around at all the kings, I slowly placed the necklace on the shoulder of Murāri, who had captured my heart.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Her locks fell over the edges of her cheeks since her locks were tied in a special way near her ears. I looked at the kings present with distain, and then looked at Kṛṣṇa with cooling, smiling glances. With attached heart, I placed a garland that I had made with my own hands (sva-mālām) for him on the shoulders of Murārī, killer of Mura, qualified as the greatest hero. The face had abundant locks around them and its cheeks shone with earrings. Or, the face had cheeks shining with earrings and abundant locks. Śiśira means cool or faint. Going (ayā) with attracted heart (hṛd) to Murāri, I placed the garland on his shoulder. This indicates their mutual love.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

I lifted my face, with glances of cool smiles and looked the kings gathered there with distain. Slowly I placed the garland on the Lord, which she held in her hand to present to him (sva-mālām), because my heart was attracted to him. She was absorbed in the Lord out of intense prema. Kṛṣṇa was the killer of the powerful demon Mura. Thus the garland was suitable for him, since he was courageous. Her cheeks glowed from her two earrings and plentiful locks of hair. Her smile was soft (śiśira). Or she went (ayā) to Murārī whose heart was attracted to her (anurakta-hṛt). They had mutual prema.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)
Related verses
Concepts
Moksha
I glanced around at all the kings and slowly placed the necklace on Murāri, who had captured my heart. The chosen one is not announced; the heart simply moves toward Him.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does my heart already know its choice but my action has not caught up?
  • What gesture would let the choice become visible?

She lifts her face once, glances around the assembly with cool sidelong eyes, and slowly — śanakaiḥ, slowly — places her garland on Murāri's shoulder. The slowness is theological: there is no rival under consideration; the glance around is courtesy, not deliberation. Her citta had gone to Mukunda at Nārada's first verse; the hand is only completing the citta's journey.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.30

↗
तावन्मृदङ्गपटहा: शङ्खभेर्यानकादय: । निनेदुर्नटनर्तक्यो ननृतुर्गायका जगु: ॥ ३० ॥
tāvan mṛdaṅga-paṭahāḥ
[taavan mridanga-patahaah]
śaṅkha-bhery-ānakādayaḥ
[shankha-bhery-aanakaadayah]
ninedur naṭa-nartakyo
[ninedur nata-nartakyo]
nanṛtur gāyakā jaguḥ
[nanritur gaayakaa jaguh]
tāvat — just then mṛdaṅga - paṭahāḥ — mṛdaṅga and paṭaha drums śaṅkha — conchshells bherī — kettledrums ānaka — large military drums ādayaḥ — and so on nineduḥ — resounded naṭa — male dancers nartakyaḥ — and female dancers nanṛtuḥ — danced gāyakāḥ — singers jaguḥ — sang .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tāvan mṛdaṅga-paṭahāḥ
tāvat
just then
mṛdaṅga - paṭahāḥ
mṛdaṅga and paṭaha drums
śaṅkha-bhery-ānakādayaḥ
śaṅkha
conchshells
bherī
kettledrums
ānaka
large military drums
ādayaḥ
and so on
ninedur naṭa-nartakyo
nineduḥ
resounded
naṭa
male dancers
nartakyaḥ
and female dancers
nanṛtur gāyakā jaguḥ
nanṛtuḥ
danced
gāyakāḥ
singers
jaguḥ
sang .
  • mṛdaṅga - paṭahāḥ — mṛdaṅga and paṭaha drums
    Mṛdaṅga is the two-headed clay drum central to Gauḍīya saṅkīrtana — the same drum Caitanya Mahāprabhu's saṅkīrtana parties carried through Navadvīpa. The verse plants the mṛdaṅga at the bride's first procession to the Lord; Gauḍīya tradition picks it up and never sets it down.
  • śaṅkha — conchshell
    The conch sounded at every Vedic auspicious moment — Kṛṣṇa's own conch is Pāñcajanya. Its sound is the audible form of the praṇava in Vaiṣṇava liturgy.
  • naṭa - nartakyaḥ — male and female dancers
    Naṭa (male performer) + nartakī (female dancer). Both sexes dance at the moment of union. Gauḍīya saṅkīrtana inherits this — body's response to līlā cannot be confined to seated chanting.
  • gāyakāḥ jaguḥ — singers sang
    Gāyaka (singer) + jaguḥ (sang). The cognate doubling — singers sang — is a Sanskrit emphatic device. Gauḍīya kīrtana descends from precisely such gāyaka-circles.
  • ānaka — large military drum
    Ānaka — the deep war-drum. Curiously listed at a wedding: but the verse is preparing the next beat, in which the failed suitors will attack on the road. The marriage is also a battle; the wedding-band is also the army's band.
Just then there were loud sounds of conchshells and mṛdaṅga, paṭaha, bherī and ānaka drums, as well as other instruments. Men and women began to dance, and singers began to sing.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Just then there were loud sounds of conchshells and mṛdaṅga, paṭaha, bherī and ānaka drums, as well as other instruments. Men and women began to dance, and singers began to sing.
Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

At that moment (tāvat) drums sounded. Mṛdaṅgas and paṭahās are famous. Bheris are wind instruments. Ānakas are drums. Ādayaḥ indicates cymbals and other instruments. The sequence of instruments is in order of increasing loudness of sound. The instruments sounded better than celestial instruments, spontaneously.

Related values
Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Kritajnata (Gratitude)Discriminative WisdomSatya (Truthfulness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Kshama (Forgiveness / Patience)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
Conchshells, drums, dancing, singing. The right choice is celebrated by everyone with the music suited to the moment. The body knows when something is right.
Reflection Questions
  • What in my life is the right choice that deserves visible celebration?
  • How does ceremony seal a decision?

The garlanding is acknowledged with a sudden eruption — mṛdaṅga, paṭaha, conch, kettledrum, military ānaka — male and female dancers, singers. The hall recognizes that something has just become permanent. Gauḍīya kīrtana descends from this moment: the moment human bodies, hearing the union, cannot help but sing and dance.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.31

↗
एवं वृते भगवति मयेशे नृपयूथपा: । न सेहिरे याज्ञसेनि स्पर्धन्तो हृच्छयातुरा: ॥ ३१ ॥
evaṁ vṛte bhagavati
[evam vrite bhagavati]
mayeśe nṛpa-yūthapāḥ
[mayeshe nripa-yoothapaah]
na sehire yājñaseni
[na sehire yaajnaseni]
spardhanto hṛc-chayāturāḥ
[spardhanto hrich-chayaaturaah]
evam — thus vṛte — being chosen bhagavati — the Personality of Godhead mayā — by me īśe — the Lord nṛpa — of kings yūtha - pāḥ — the leaders na sehire — could not tolerate it yājñaseni — O Draupadī spardhantaḥ — becoming quarrelsome hṛt - śaya — by lust āturāḥ — distressed .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
evaṁ vṛte bhagavati
evam
thus
vṛte
being chosen
bhagavati
the Personality of Godhead
mayeśe nṛpa-yūthapāḥ
mayā
by me
īśe
the Lord
nṛpa
of kings
yūtha - pāḥ
the leaders
na sehire yājñaseni
na sehire
could not tolerate it
yājñaseni
O Draupadī
spardhanto hṛc-chayāturāḥ
spardhantaḥ
becoming quarrelsome
hṛt - śaya
by lust
āturāḥ
distressed .
  • vṛte — (He) having been chosen
    Past participle of √vṛ — same root as svayaṁ-vara. The verse compresses the entire ceremony into one locative: vṛte — at the moment of choosing. Everything before built up to it; everything after fans out from it.
  • hṛt - śaya — lust (literally 'lying in the heart')
    Hṛt (heart) + śaya (lying). Kāma is named here by its dwelling-place — the heart, where it lies hidden. Gauḍīya kāma-tattva: lust is not external; it is the inhabitant of the unpurified heart. When frustrated, it becomes anger (krodha).
  • āturāḥ — distressed, sick
    Ātura — afflicted, diseased. Lust frustrated becomes a disease, not a passion. The kings are not heroes here; they are patients of their own hṛt-śaya. The verse pities them even as it records their attack.
  • yājñaseni — O Yājñaseni (Draupadī)
    Yājñaseni — daughter of Yajñasena (Drupada). The chapter keeps surfacing Draupadī's name to remind the listener: this is conversation, not monologue. Lakṣmaṇā speaks to a friend who has herself known suitors' violence (Karṇa's mockery at her own svayaṁvara).
  • spardhantaḥ — becoming quarrelsome
    Present participle of √spṛdh — to contend. The single word names the moment a defeated suitor abandons dignity for contest. Gauḍīya commentators note: spardhā with the Lord is the source of all asura-līlā in the Bhāgavatam.
The leading kings there could not tolerate my having chosen the Supreme Personality of Godhead, O Draupadī. Burning with lust, they became quarrelsome.

Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī comments that the contamination of lust led the kings to quarrel foolishly with the Lord even after seeing His supreme power.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The leading kings there could not tolerate my having chosen the Supreme Personality of Godhead, O Draupadī. Burning with lust, they became quarrelsome.
Commentary

O Draupadi (yajnaseni), the leaders among the kings were envious (spardhantah).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

When I chose Kṛṣṇa endowed with all powers (bhagavati) since he was directly the Supreme Lord (īśe), in this manner (evam vṛte), at that moment also, the best of the kings such as Jarāsandha could not tolerate the situation. O Yājñaseni, Draupadī, daughter of Drupada! As the daughter to Drupada devoted to sacrifice, see the great arrogance of these kings.

Related values
Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Tyaga (Renunciation / Letting Go)Yajña (Sacrifice / Spirit of Offering)Dana (Charity / Generosity)Nishkama Karma (Selfless Action)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The leading kings could not tolerate that I had chosen the Lord and became quarrelsome — even after seeing His supreme power. Lust hates losing; it does not learn from defeat.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in me does lust refuse to accept loss and keep fighting?
  • What practice helps me let an unattainable thing go?

The failed suitors cannot endure the choice. Bhakti's selection is the world's offence: kings who would have accepted defeat in honest combat cannot accept being passed over for someone they consider their equal. Their hṛt-śaya — lust-arrow — turns to blade. The verse marks the moment material desire, frustrated, becomes violence.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.32

↗
मां तावद् रथमारोप्य हयरत्नचतुष्टयम् । शार्ङ्गमुद्यम्य सन्नद्धस्तस्थावाजौ चतुर्भुज: ॥ ३२ ॥
māṁ tāvad ratham āropya
[maam taavad ratham aaropya]
haya-ratna-catuṣṭayam
[haya-ratna-chatushtayam]
śārṅgam udyamya sannaddhas
[shaarngam udyamya sannaddhas]
tasthāv ājau catur-bhujaḥ
[tasthaav aajau chatur-bhujah]
mām — me tāvat — at that point ratham — on the chariot āropya — lifting haya — of horses ratna — gems catuṣṭayam — having four śārṅgam — His bow, named Śārṅga udyamya — readying sannaddhaḥ — putting on His armor tasthau — He stood ājau — on the battleground catuḥ — four bhujaḥ — with arms .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
māṁ tāvad ratham āropya
mām
me
tāvat
at that point
ratham
on the chariot
āropya
lifting
haya-ratna-catuṣṭayam
haya
of horses
ratna
gems
catuṣṭayam
having four
śārṅgam udyamya sannaddhas
śārṅgam
His bow, named Śārṅga
udyamya
readying
sannaddhaḥ
putting on His armor
tasthāv ājau catur-bhujaḥ
tasthau
He stood
ājau
on the battleground
catuḥ
four
bhujaḥ
with arms .
  • śārṅgam — His bow Śārṅga
    Śārṅga — Kṛṣṇa's bow, made of horn (śṛṅga). Distinct from Arjuna's Gāṇḍīva. The same bow appears in the Rāmāyaṇa as Viṣṇu's bow that Paraśurāma offered to Rāma. The verse names the weapon to signal: this is no human-grade bow.
  • catuḥ - bhujaḥ — four-armed
    Catur (four) + bhuja (arm). At the moment of departing with His bride, Kṛṣṇa briefly manifests His Nārāyaṇa-form. Gauḍīya rasa-theology: this is one of the rare instances Kṛṣṇa shows aiśvarya in His Dvārakā-līlā; usually He stays in His two-armed Vrajendra-kumāra mādhurya.
  • haya - ratna - catuṣṭayam — (chariot drawn by) four jewel-horses
    Haya (horse) + ratna (jewel) + catuṣṭaya (set of four). His four horses are named in tradition: Śaibya, Sugrīva, Meghapuṣpa, Balāhaka. The four-horse chariot is the standard cakravartin transport — but also the chariot in which Kṛṣṇa would later drive Arjuna at Kurukṣetra.
  • sannaddhaḥ — armored, fully prepared
    Sam (full) + naddha (bound, girded). The bridegroom puts on armor — not the wedding-jewelry the bride has just put on. The verse holds two registers simultaneously: wedding and battle, mādhurya and vīra.
  • ājau — on the battleground
    Āji — battlefield. The same site that was a moment ago a wedding-hall becomes ājau. Gauḍīya commentators note: where the Lord goes, every site becomes the right kind of site. He turns wedding-hall to ājau, ājau to wedding-hall.
The Lord then placed me on His chariot, drawn by four most excellent horses. Donning His armor and readying His bow Śārṅga, He stood on the chariot, and there on the battleground He manifested His four arms.

With two of His four arms, according to Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, Lord Kṛṣṇa embraced His bride, and with the other two He held His bow and arrows.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord then placed me on His chariot, drawn by four most excellent horses. Donning His armor and readying His bow Śārṅga, He stood on the chariot, and there on the battleground He manifested His four arms.
Commentary

Assuming four hands, Krsna held me, very frightened, with two arms, and held his bow and arrows with the other.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

With four excellent horses the chariot could travel at great speed. Ready (sannaddhaḥ) to fight (ājau), he stood on the chariot remaining in a high position.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The Lord placed me on His chariot, donned armor, took Śārṅga, and manifested four arms. Two arms embraced me, two held bow and arrow. Love and protection are simultaneous in His person.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I split tenderness and protection as if they were separate functions?
  • How does Kṛṣṇa's four-armed image teach integration?

The Lord lifts Lakṣmaṇā onto His chariot — the same chariot Dāruka will drive in the next verse — dons His armor, takes up Śārṅga, and, in the moment of departure, manifests His four arms. The four arms are not for the bride's comfort; they are for the suitors' clarity. The husband is also Nārāyaṇa. The marriage is also a cosmic statement.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.33

↗
दारुकश्चोदयामास काञ्चनोपस्करं रथम् । मिषतां भूभुजां राज्ञि मृगाणां मृगराडिव ॥ ३३ ॥
dārukaś codayām āsa
[daarukash chodayaam aasa]
kāñcanopaskaraṁ ratham
[kaanchanopaskaram ratham]
miṣatāṁ bhū-bhujāṁ rājñi
[mishataam bhoo-bhujaam raajni]
mṛgāṇāṁ mṛga-rāḍ iva
[mrigaanaam mriga-raad iva]
dārukaḥ — Dāruka (Lord Kṛṣṇa’s chariot driver) codayām āsa — drove kāñcana — golden upaskaram — whose trimmings ratham — the chariot miṣatām — as they watched bhū - bhujām — the kings rājñi — O Queen mṛgāṇām — animals mṛga - rāṭ — the king of animals, the lion iva — as if .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dārukaś codayām āsa
dārukaḥ
Dāruka (Lord Kṛṣṇa’s chariot driver)
codayām āsa
drove
kāñcanopaskaraṁ ratham
kāñcana
golden
upaskaram
whose trimmings
ratham
the chariot
miṣatāṁ bhū-bhujāṁ rājñi
miṣatām
as they watched
bhū - bhujām
the kings
rājñi
O Queen
mṛgāṇāṁ mṛga-rāḍ iva
mṛgāṇām
animals
mṛga - rāṭ
the king of animals, the lion
iva
as if .
  • dārukaḥ — Dāruka
    Kṛṣṇa's personal chārioteer, a major figure throughout Canto 10. Gauḍīya tradition holds Dāruka as the embodiment of dāsya-sevā among Kṛṣṇa's personal staff — the servant whose entire role is to drive whenever the Lord moves.
  • kāñcana - upaskaram — with golden trimmings
    Kāñcana (gold) + upaskara (trimming, fitting). The chariot is described as gold-fitted — Bhagavān's aiśvarya visible in the very vehicle. Even the chariot is a manifestation of Lakṣmī following Him.
  • mṛga - rāṭ — the king of animals (lion)
    Mṛga (beast) + rāj (king). Third lion-image in the chapter (after Rukmiṇī's mṛgendraḥ and Mitravindā's dvipa-ariḥ). Gauḍīya commentators note the pattern: Kṛṣṇa's bridal departures are consistently lion-images — calm power moving among lesser beings.
  • miṣatām — (of the kings) as they watched
    Present participle of √miṣ — to watch wide-eyed. The kings are not blind; they see clearly. Their failure is not perceptual but volitional — they cannot bring themselves to act effectively while watching.
  • bhū - bhujām — of the earth-protectors
    Bhū (earth) + bhuj (enjoyer, protector). Variant of bhū-pā. The kings who claimed to protect/enjoy the earth watch the Lord of the earth depart with their hoped-for prize.
Dāruka drove the Lord’s gold-trimmed chariot as the kings looked on, O Queen, like small animals helplessly watching a lion.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Dāruka drove the Lord's gold-trimmed chariot as the kings looked on, O Queen, like small animals helplessly watching a lion.
Commentary

He went like a lion, while the other animals looked on(misitam). Using the sixth case for misitam indicates disregard for the kings.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Dāruka drove the gold-plated chariot, which could thus be seen from far away, while the kings looked on. Possessive case (miṣatāṁ bhū-bhujāṁ) is used to should disrespect for the kings. They were like animals watching a lion. This indicates Dāruka’s fearlessness. She called out to Draupadī “O queen!” in great enthusiasm.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Dāruka drove as the kings watched like small animals helplessly watching a lion. When the Lord takes someone, opposition can only watch.
Reflection Questions
  • Where does my opposition only watch what is being taken by the Lord?
  • How does this image shift my relationship to envy?

Dāruka drives — the same chārioteer who will drive Kṛṣṇa across countless battles — and the kings watch the gold-trimmed chariot recede the way small forest animals watch a lion walk past, helpless and motionless. The kings could shoot at the chariot; they will, in the next verses. But the watching itself is already a kind of defeat.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.34

↗
तेऽन्वसज्जन्त राजन्या निषेद्धुं पथि केचन । संयत्ता उद्‍धृतेष्वासा ग्रामसिंहा यथा हरिम् ॥ ३४ ॥
te ’nvasajjanta rājanyā
[te ’nvasajjanta raajanyaa]
niṣeddhuṁ pathi kecana
[nisheddhum pathi kechana]
saṁyattā uddhṛteṣv-āsā
[samyattaa uddhriteshv-aasaa]
grāma-siṁhā yathā harim
[graama-simhaa yathaa harim]
te — they anvasajjanta — followed from behind rājanyāḥ — the kings niṣeddhum — to check Him pathi — on the path kecana — some of them saṁyattāḥ — ready uddhṛta — raised iṣu - āsāḥ — whose bows grāma - siṁhā — “lions of the village” (dogs) yathā — as harim — a lion .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te ’nvasajjanta rājanyā
te
they
anvasajjanta
followed from behind
rājanyāḥ
the kings
niṣeddhuṁ pathi kecana
niṣeddhum
to check Him
pathi
on the path
kecana
some of them
saṁyattā uddhṛteṣv-āsā
saṁyattāḥ
ready
uddhṛta
raised
iṣu - āsāḥ
whose bows
grāma-siṁhā yathā harim
grāma - siṁhā
“lions of the village” (dogs)
yathā
as
harim
a lion .
  • grāma - siṁhā — lions of the village (i.e., dogs)
    Grāma (village) + siṁha (lion). A sarcastic Sanskrit kenning — a dog is the 'village-lion'. The chapter has built the lion-image three times for Kṛṣṇa; here it is inverted for His attackers. The same word, opposite weight.
  • harim — the lion (also: the Lord, Hari)
    Hari can mean both 'lion' and 'the Lord'. The dual meaning is deliberate. Grammatically: the village-dogs chase the lion; theologically: the kings chase Hari Himself. The text refuses to separate the two readings.
  • anvasajjanta — they pursued, attached themselves behind
    Anu (after) + √sañj (to cling). The verb means both 'follow' and 'cling attachedly'. Their pursuit is described in the language of attachment — they cannot let go even after they have lost.
  • niṣeddhum — to check, to obstruct
    Infinitive of ni + √sidh — to stop. The kings tried to obstruct the Lord's chariot. Gauḍīya commentators: this is the asura-volition in concentrated form — to obstruct the Lord's movement, to put oneself between Him and His bhakta.
  • uddhṛta - iṣu - āsāḥ — whose bows had arrows raised (drawn)
    Uddhṛta (raised) + iṣu (arrow) + āsa (bow). Compound describing the suitors' position: bows already drawn before they were within range. The eagerness of failed kāma.
The kings pursued the Lord like village dogs chasing a lion. Some kings, raising their bows, stationed themselves on the road to stop Him as He passed by.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The kings pursued the Lord like village dogs chasing a lion. Some kings, raising their bows, stationed themselves on the road to stop Him as He passed by.
Commentary

The kings followed behind to stop him, like dogs following a lion. Some lifted their bows (uddhrta isu asah), like dogs lifting up their tails (asa).

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The kings with raised bows were like dogs with raised tails. Another meaning is as follows. Because of the chariot’s speed, some of the kings could not even raise their bows and remained far behind. Some foolish kings on swift chariots chased him to stop him on the path. They were eager for battle and thus raised their bows.

Related values
Adambhitva (Non-hypocrisy / Authenticity)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Tejas (Inner Radiance / Vigour)Discriminative Wisdom
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
The kings pursued like village dogs chasing a lion; some stationed themselves to block. Petty pursuit of the Lord's chariot accomplishes nothing — yet the proud keep trying.
Reflection Questions
  • Where am I 'village-dog chasing' something far beyond my reach?
  • What would noticing this image cost me — and free me from?

The kings rouse themselves at last and chase like village dogs barking at a lion — some flank the road ahead with raised bows, others trail behind. The image is unforgiving: grāma-siṁha, 'lion of the village,' is the Sanskrit kenning for a dog. Dogs imagine themselves lions when the real lion is not in view; when He appears, the imagination collapses.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.35

↗
ते शार्ङ्गच्युतबाणौघै: कृत्तबाह्वङ्‍‍घ्रिकन्धरा: । निपेतु: प्रधने केचिदेके सन्त्यज्य दुद्रुवु: ॥ ३५ ॥
te śārṅga-cyuta-bāṇaughaiḥ
[te shaarnga-chyuta-baanaughaih]
kṛtta-bāhv-aṅghri-kandharāḥ
[kritta-baahv-anghri-kandharaah]
nipetuḥ pradhane kecid
[nipetuh pradhane kechid]
eke santyajya dudruvuḥ
[eke santyajya dudruvuh]
te — they śārṅga — from Lord Kṛṣṇa’s bow cyuta — shot bāṇa — of arrows oghaiḥ — by the floods kṛtta — severed bāhu — whose arms aṅghri — legs kandharāḥ — and necks nipetuḥ — fell pradhane — on the battlefield kecit — some eke — some santyajya — giving up dudruvuḥ — fled .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
te śārṅga-cyuta-bāṇaughaiḥ
te
they
śārṅga
from Lord Kṛṣṇa’s bow
cyuta
shot
bāṇa
of arrows
oghaiḥ
by the floods
kṛtta-bāhv-aṅghri-kandharāḥ
kṛtta
severed
bāhu
whose arms
aṅghri
legs
kandharāḥ
and necks
nipetuḥ pradhane kecid
nipetuḥ
fell
pradhane
on the battlefield
kecit
some
eke santyajya dudruvuḥ
eke
some
santyajya
giving up
dudruvuḥ
fled .
  • śārṅga - cyuta - bāṇa - oghaiḥ — by the floods of arrows shot from Śārṅga
    Śārṅga (bow) + cyuta (shot, released) + bāṇa (arrow) + ogha (flood). The same Śārṅga of verse 32, now in full deployment. Note: ogha is the word also used for the flood of saṁsāra — Kṛṣṇa's arrows are the corresponding flood that cuts saṁsāra.
  • kṛtta - bāhu - aṅghri - kandharāḥ — whose arms, legs, and necks were severed
    Kṛtta (cut) + bāhu (arm) + aṅghri (leg) + kandhara (neck). Three points of human-pride severance. Gauḍīya commentators note: Bhagavān's arrows cut the obstructing limbs — arms that would have held weapons, legs that would have pursued, necks that would have bobbed in defiance.
  • santyajya dudruvuḥ — abandoning (the fight), they fled
    Sam + tyaj (to fully give up) + dudruvuḥ (they ran). The second class of suitors: not the dead, but the surrendered. They give up the fight and run. The Lord lets them go — He had no quarrel with them beyond their attempt to obstruct.
  • pradhane — on the battlefield
    Pradhana — battle, principal engagement. Same field that had been the wedding-hall thirty verses ago. Gauḍīya commentators: the Lord's līlā compresses opposites — the same ground becomes wedding-hall and battle-ground without travelling.
  • nipetuḥ — they fell
    Ni (down) + √pat (fall). Echo of verse 22's petuḥ — those who could not even string the bow had fallen earlier; these fall now, struck by the same bow they could not handle. The verse closes the contest's symmetry.
These warriors were deluged by arrows shot from the Lord’s bow, Śārṅga. Some of the kings fell on the battlefield with severed arms, legs and necks; the rest gave up the fight and fled.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
These warriors were deluged by arrows shot from the Lord's bow, Śārṅga. Some of the kings fell on the battlefield with severed arms, legs and necks; the rest gave up the fight and fled.
Commentary

Some fell in the battlefield and others gave up the battlefield and fled.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

By the mass of arrows emanating as if by themselves from his bow, some kings had their arms severed, some had their feet severed and some had their heads severed. Or, simultaneously they had their arms, legs and heads severed. First he cut off their arms which held weapons for fighting and then cut off their legs to make them fall down. To make them die swiftly he cut off their heads. This indicates swiftness of his arrows. They fell down permanently (ni—petuḥ) on the battlefield—dead. Giving up the battlefield completely (sam—tyajya), going far away some, some swiftly fled.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)Karuna (Kindness / Compassion)
Related verses
Some kings fell with severed arms, legs, necks; others fled. Opposition to the Lord's choice has consequences proportionate to the persistence; backing down is wisdom.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could backing down before the Lord's clear choice spare me?
  • What does it mean to honor what He has decided?

Śārṅga's arrows came in floods — bāṇa-oghaiḥ. The same bow that pierced one hidden fish now releases torrents. Arms, legs, necks severed; the rest run. The Lord's response to obstruction is precise: He does not destroy out of anger; He removes the obstruction. The road must be clear because the bride is on the chariot.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.36

↗
तत: पुरीं यदुपतिरत्यलङ्कृतां रविच्छदध्वजपटचित्रतोरणाम् । कुशस्थलीं दिवि भुवि चाभिसंस्तुतां समाविशत्तरणिरिव स्वकेतनम् ॥ ३६ ॥
tataḥ purīṁ yadu-patir aty-alaṅkṛtāṁ
[tatah pureem yadu-patir aty-alankritaam]
ravi-cchada-dhvaja-paṭa-citra-toraṇām
[ravi-chchada-dhvaja-pata-chitra-toranaam]
kuśasthalīṁ divi bhuvi cābhisaṁstutāṁ
[kushasthaleem divi bhuvi chaabhisamstutaam]
samāviśat taraṇir iva sva-ketanam
[samaavishat taranir iva sva-ketanam]
tataḥ — then purīm — His city yadu - patiḥ — the Lord of the Yadus ati — profusely alaṅkṛtām — decorated ravi — the sun chada — blocking dhvaja — upon flagpoles paṭa — with banners citra — wonderful toraṇām — and with archways kuśasthalīm — Dvārakā divi — in heaven bhuvi — on the earth ca — and abhisaṁstutām — glorified samāviśat — He entered taraṇiḥ — the sun iva — as if sva — his own ketanam — abode .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tataḥ purīṁ yadu-patir aty-alaṅkṛtāṁ
tataḥ
then
purīm
His city
yadu - patiḥ
the Lord of the Yadus
ati
profusely
alaṅkṛtām
decorated
ravi-cchada-dhvaja-paṭa-citra-toraṇām
ravi
the sun
chada
blocking
dhvaja
upon flagpoles
paṭa
with banners
citra
wonderful
toraṇām
and with archways
kuśasthalīṁ divi bhuvi cābhisaṁstutāṁ
kuśasthalīm
Dvārakā
divi
in heaven
bhuvi
on the earth
ca
and
abhisaṁstutām
glorified
samāviśat taraṇir iva sva-ketanam
samāviśat
He entered
taraṇiḥ
the sun
iva
as if
sva
his own
ketanam
abode .
  • kuśasthalīm — Kuśasthalī (Dvārakā)
    Kuśa (a sacred grass) + sthala (place). Dvārakā's older name — the place originally raised by King Raivata. Gauḍīya cosmology holds Dvārakā as one of the eternal līlā-locales, manifested on earth at Kṛṣṇa's advent.
  • yadu - patiḥ — Lord of the Yadus
    Yadu (the clan) + pati (lord). Kṛṣṇa's title as the head of the Yādava dynasty. He enters not as a successful suitor but as the king coming home with a queen — the dynastic frame restored.
  • ravi - chada - dhvaja - paṭa — flag-banners (so many) they covered the sun
    Ravi (sun) + chada (covering) + dhvaja (flag) + paṭa (banner). The hyperbole: the city's flag-banners block the sun. Yet the next phrase compares Kṛṣṇa Himself to the sun entering His abode — the only sun the city needs is now within its walls.
  • taraṇiḥ iva sva - ketanam — as the sun enters its own abode
    Taraṇi (sun, that which crosses) + iva (like) + sva (own) + ketana (abode). The simile reverses the previous phrase's hyperbole: the flag-banners block the outer sun precisely because the inner Sun has just arrived. Gauḍīya doctrine: Dvārakā is illumined by Kṛṣṇa Himself, not by sūrya.
  • abhisaṁstutām — glorified (from all sides)
    Abhi (all around) + sam (fully) + stuta (praised). Dvārakā is sung by both divi and bhuvi — heaven and earth. The verse stations Kṛṣṇa's city in the same triloka-gītā category as Hari-kathā itself (verse 5).
The Lord of the Yadus then entered His capital city, Kuśasthalī [Dvārakā], which is glorified in heaven and on earth. The city was elaborately decorated with flagpoles carrying banners that blocked the sun, and also with splendid archways. As Lord Kṛṣṇa entered, He appeared like the sun-god entering his abode.

The abode of the sun is in the western mountains, where he sets each evening.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Lord of the Yadus then entered His capital city, Kuśasthalī [Dvārakā], which is glorified in heaven and on earth. The city was elaborately decorated with flagpoles carrying banners that blocked the sun, and also with splendid archways. As Lord Kṛṣṇa entered, He appeared like the sun-god entering his abode.
Commentary

Krsna entered Dvaraka which had flags on poles which covered the sun. and wonderful arches.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

After this (tataḥ), not without first defeating the kings, he entered Dvārakā, since he was the best of the great warriors (yadu-patiḥ). Or, he was the husband (patiḥ) among the Yadus, since he had now attained a wife. The details of the city decorated at that time for his entrance indicate the joy that had arisen in the Yadus. That city was praised profusely (abhi--saṁstutām) in heaven and on earth as the greatest. It was an extraordinary city even without the present decorations. He entered the city just like the sun, which shines independently and illuminates its surroundings when entering its area in the sky (sva-ketanam). He entered with accompaniment of music (sam) and with bliss (ā). Taruṇi is also a name of Viṣṇu. He entered Dvārakā just as Viṣṇu enters Vaikuṇṭha.

Related values
Dhriti (Resilience / Steadfastness / Fortitude)
Concepts
ChitJapaJiva
The Lord entered Kuśasthalī (Dvārakā) — glorified in heaven and earth — like the sun entering its abode. The Lord's home is celestial in its own dimension; entering it with Him is reaching home.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'Dvārakā' am I being brought home to with the Lord?
  • How do I let myself enter rather than hesitating at the gate?

Then He enters His own city — Kuśasthalī, Dvārakā — decorated to the point of blocking the sun with flag-banners and arched gateways. Bhagavān entering His own purī is compared to the sun entering its own abode. He has come home, and the bride He has brought is the home's new resident. The chapter has travelled from Bṛhatsena's puram (verse 20) to Bhagavān's purīm — from contest-city to ārādhya-city.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.37

↗
पिता मे पूजयामास सुहृत्सम्बन्धिबान्धवान् । महार्हवासोऽलङ्कारै: शय्यासनपरिच्छदै: ॥ ३७ ॥
pitā me pūjayām āsa
[pitaa me poojayaam aasa]
suhṛt-sambandhi-bāndhavān
[suhrit-sambandhi-baandhavaan]
mahārha-vāso-’laṅkāraiḥ
[mahaarha-vaaso-’lankaaraih]
śayyāsana-paricchadaiḥ
[shayyaasana-parichchadaih]
pitā — father me — my pūjayām āsa — worshiped suhṛt — his friends sambandhi — immediate relations bāndhavān — and other family members mahā — very arha — valuable vāsaḥ — with clothing alaṅkāraiḥ — and jewelry śayyā — with beds āsana — thrones paricchadaiḥ — and other furniture .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
pitā me pūjayām āsa
pitā
father
me
my
pūjayām āsa
worshiped
suhṛt-sambandhi-bāndhavān
suhṛt
his friends
sambandhi
immediate relations
bāndhavān
and other family members
mahārha-vāso-’laṅkāraiḥ
mahā
very
arha
valuable
vāsaḥ
with clothing
alaṅkāraiḥ
and jewelry
śayyāsana-paricchadaiḥ
śayyā
with beds
āsana
thrones
paricchadaiḥ
and other furniture .
  • suhṛt - sambandhi - bāndhavān — friends, immediate relations, and (other) family
    Suhṛt (good-hearted, well-wisher) + sambandhi (related by marriage) + bāndhava (kinsman). The three layers of Vedic family economy. Bṛhatsena honors all three — the dāna ripples outward.
  • mahā - arha - vāsaḥ — very valuable clothing
    Mahā (great) + arha (worthy) + vāsas (clothing). Vedic dāna's first item — clothing for the relatives. Cf. verse 38's mahā-arhāṇi āyudhāni — the same compound for the weapons given to Kṛṣṇa Himself.
  • alaṅkāraiḥ — with ornaments
    Alaṅkāra — ornament; also the rhetorical figure in Sanskrit poetics. Vedic dāna invests material into relationship; ornaments mark the recipient as part of the family's outer circle.
  • śayyā - āsana - paricchadaiḥ — with beds, thrones, and other furniture
    Śayyā (bed) + āsana (seat) + paricchada (covering, furnishing). Household goods that mark the recipients as permanent residents in dignity. Bṛhatsena is establishing each relative as householder-in-relation-to-Kṛṣṇa's-family.
  • pūjayām āsa — he honored, worshipped
    Pūjana (worship) — the same verb used for ritual deity-worship. Vedic dāna toward relatives is conceived as pūjā — they are honored as forms of the Lord's expanded sambandha.
My father honored his friends, family and in-laws with priceless clothing and jewelry and with royal beds, thrones and other furnishings.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
My father honored his friends, family and in-laws with priceless clothing and jewelry and with royal beds, thrones and other furnishings.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The king honored the Lord’s friends and relations through that marriage (sambandhi) and other relatives (bāndhavān). At the time of the marriage the king himself came to Dvārakā.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The king honored his own or the Lord’s friends (suhṛt), relations through that marriage (sambandhi) and other relatives as well (bāndhavān). He honored them with priceless clothing etc. which were sent with them Or later the king himself came to Dvārakā.

Concepts
AsanaJiva
My father honored friends, family, in-laws with clothes, jewelry, beds, thrones, furnishings. Wealth used for honoring family is wealth used well.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could my resources honor family more fully?
  • What gift of dignity could I extend today?

Bṛhatsena, having given his daughter, now gives gifts to every relative on both sides — clothing, jewelry, beds, thrones. The Vedic father's dāna does not end at the daughter; it spreads outward to the whole sambandha-network. Gauḍīya devotion inherits this: giving the heart to Kṛṣṇa is followed by giving to Kṛṣṇa's devotees.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.38

↗
दासीभि: सर्वसम्पद्भ‍िर्भटेभरथवाजिभि: । आयुधानि महार्हाणि ददौ पूर्णस्य भक्तित: ॥ ३८ ॥
dāsībhiḥ sarva-sampadbhir
[daaseebhih sarva-sampadbhir]
bhaṭebha-ratha-vājibhiḥ
[bhatebha-ratha-vaajibhih]
āyudhāni mahārhāṇi
[aayudhaani mahaarhaani]
dadau pūrṇasya bhaktitaḥ
[dadau poornasya bhaktitah]
dāsībhiḥ — along with maidservants sarva — all sampadbhiḥ — endowed with riches bhaṭa — with infantry soldiers ibha — soldiers riding elephants ratha — soldiers riding chariots vājibhiḥ — and soldiers riding horses āyudhāni — weapons mahā - arhāṇi — extremely valuable dadau — he gave pūrṇasya — to the perfectly complete Lord bhaktitaḥ — out of devotion .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
dāsībhiḥ sarva-sampadbhir
dāsībhiḥ
along with maidservants
sarva
all
sampadbhiḥ
endowed with riches
bhaṭebha-ratha-vājibhiḥ
bhaṭa
with infantry soldiers
ibha
soldiers riding elephants
ratha
soldiers riding chariots
vājibhiḥ
and soldiers riding horses
āyudhāni mahārhāṇi
āyudhāni
weapons
mahā - arhāṇi
extremely valuable
dadau pūrṇasya bhaktitaḥ
dadau
he gave
pūrṇasya
to the perfectly complete Lord
bhaktitaḥ
out of devotion .
  • pūrṇasya — of the perfectly complete one
    Pūrṇa — full, complete. The same word used in the Īśa Upaniṣad's pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idam. Bhagavān is pūrṇa, and yet His devotee gives Him gifts. Gauḍīya doctrine: dāna to the pūrṇa is the only dāna whose value is not in the gift but in the giving.
  • bhaktitaḥ — out of devotion
    Bhakti + ablative suffix -taḥ — 'from devotion'. The motive of the entire gift is named explicitly: not dharma, not custom, not display. Bhakti. Gauḍīya kīrti-bhakti is the same root in act: action poured outward from the bhāva that gives.
  • dāsībhiḥ — with maidservants
    Dāsī — the same word the queens have applied to themselves (verses 10, 14, 39). The bride brings dāsīs to serve, but she calls herself a dāsī too. The chapter quietly collapses queen and maidservant into a single bhakti-category.
  • mahā - arhāṇi — extremely valuable
    Mahā (great) + arha (worthy). The qualifier applied to the āyudhas Bṛhatsena gives. Bṛhatsena's gifts to Bhagavān, who is Himself the bearer of every weapon, must be mahā-arha to be worth offering at all. The act is pure relationship — Kṛṣṇa has no need, the father has every need to give.
  • bhaṭa - ibha - ratha - vājibhiḥ — with foot soldiers, elephants, chariots, and horses
    Compound of the four traditional aṅgas of the army. Bṛhatsena gives a complete caturaṅginī as part of the dowry — the same word appeared at verse 13-14 in Nagnajit's gift to Kṛṣṇa with Satyā. The pattern of royal dāna repeats.
With devotion he presented the perfectly complete Lord with a number of maidservants bedecked with precious ornaments. Accompanying these maidservants were guards walking on foot and others riding elephants, chariots and horses. He also gave the Lord extremely valuable weapons.

The Supreme Lord is pūrṇa, perfect and complete in Himself. He requires nothing for His satisfaction. Knowing this, a pure devotee makes offerings to the Lord only out of love, bhaktitaḥ, with no expectation of material profit. And on His part, the Lord happily accepts even a small gift of flowers, tulasī leaves and water when it has been offered in love.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
With devotion he presented the perfectly complete Lord with a number of maidservants bedecked with precious ornaments. Accompanying these maidservants were guards walking on foot and others riding elephants, chariots and horses. He also gave the Lord extremely valuable weapons.
Commentary

My father gave priceless weapons along with female servants to the Lord, who is perfect (purnasya), out of devotion (bhaktitah), because by devotion the Lord will accept even leaves or flowers.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

The king gave servants endowed with all wealth of ornaments and new youth and similarly endowed army with four parts. Or he gave, along with all wealth and servants, brave foot soldiers etc. He gave so generously because of his devotion (bhaktitaḥ). It was already said that the Lord accepts even leaves if given with devotion. (SB 10.81.4) The example of the sun and lamp should be considered. Raver dīpam ivādṛtāḥ: these presentations were like the offering of a lamp to the sun. (SB 1.11.4)

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomSeva (Service / Selfless Action)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ishvara Pranidhana (Surrender to God)Aparigraha (Non-possessiveness)
Related verses
He presented the Lord with maidservants, foot guards, elephant-, chariot-, and horse-mounted attendants, and valuable weapons. Gifts to the Lord are extravagant because the giver loves, not because the Lord needs.
Reflection Questions
  • Where do I give the Lord small gifts because I think He needs little?
  • What would extravagant offering look like, motivated by love?

Now Bṛhatsena turns toward Kṛṣṇa Himself — the only recipient he calls pūrṇa, the perfectly complete. The dowry includes maidservants ornamented, infantry-elephant-chariot-horse divisions, and mahā-arha weapons. To give to Bhagavān is the strangest possible act — He lacks nothing — yet bhakti gives anyway, because the giving itself is the relationship.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.39

↗
आत्मारामस्य तस्येमा वयं वै गृहदासिका: । सर्वसङ्गनिवृत्त्याद्धा तपसा च बभूविम ॥ ३९ ॥
ātmārāmasya tasyemā
[aatmaaraamasya tasyemaa]
vayaṁ vai gṛha-dāsikāḥ
[vayam vai griha-daasikaah]
sarva-saṅga-nivṛttyāddhā
[sarva-sanga-nivrittyaaddhaa]
tapasā ca babhūvima
[tapasaa cha babhoovima]
ātma - ārāmasya — of the self-satisfied tasya — Him imāḥ — these vayam — we vai — indeed gṛha — in the home dāsikāḥ — maidservants sarva — all saṅga — of material association nivṛttyā — by the cessation addhā — directly tapasā — by austerity ca — and babhūvima — have become .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
ātmārāmasya tasyemā
ātma - ārāmasya
of the self-satisfied
tasya
Him
vayaṁ vai gṛha-dāsikāḥ
sarva-saṅga-nivṛttyāddhā
tapasā ca babhūvima
imāḥ
these
vayam
we
vai
indeed
gṛha
in the home
dāsikāḥ
maidservants
sarva
all
saṅga
of material association
nivṛttyā
by the cessation
addhā
directly
tapasā
by austerity
ca
and
babhūvima
have become .
  • ātma - ārāmasya — of Him who is self-satisfied
    Ātma (self) + ārāma (pleasure, garden). Bhagavān takes pleasure in His own self — He needs no external object. Gauḍīya doctrine: yet His devotees serve Him precisely because He is ātmārāma — they serve not to please Him but to be near Him. The grammar of nirhetukī bhakti.
  • gṛha - dāsikāḥ — maidservants of the household
    Gṛha (house) + dāsikā (maidservant). The queens' final self-description. The chapter has refused 'queen' as the operative word from beginning (Rukmiṇī's arcanā) to end (Lakṣmaṇā's gṛha-dāsikā). Gauḍīya dāsya as the sthāyī-bhāva of even mādhurya.
  • saṅga - nivṛttyā — by the cessation of (material) association
    Saṅga (attachment, association) + nivṛtti (cessation). The technical Vaiṣṇava term for vairāgya. The queens did not arrive at Bhagavān's house with their old attachments intact — each had let go of something (Rukmiṇī her arranged match, Kālindī her solitary tapas, Mitravindā her brothers' favor).
  • tapasā — by austerity
    Tapas — the same word that named Kālindī's marriage-route at verse 11. Here generalized: every queen has practiced some tapas, whether years of penance or merely the heat of bearing the suitors' violence. Gauḍīya: tapas is heat applied to the body so the soul may show through.
  • addhā — directly, in truth
    Addhā — adverb meaning 'truly, indeed, directly'. The queens insist their dāsīhood is not metaphorical or honorific — it is direct, actual service. Gauḍīya bhakti rejects vague metaphorical service in favor of concrete sevā.
Thus, by renouncing all material association and practicing austere penances, we queens have all become personal maidservants of the self-satisfied Supreme Lord.

In the opinion of Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī, Śrīmatī Lakṣmaṇā became embarrassed when she realized that she had been talking about herself, and so she spoke this verse praising her co-wives. In her humility Lakṣmaṇā claimed that Kṛṣṇa’s queens, unlike ordinary wives, could not bring their husband under control, and thus they could relate to Him only as servile housekeepers. In fact, however, since the Lord’s queens are direct expansions of His internal pleasure potency ( hlādinī-śakti ), they fully controlled Him with their love.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Thus, by renouncing all material association and practicing austere penances, we queens have all become personal maidservants of the self-satisfied Supreme Lord.
Commentary

Being absorbed, she described profusely about herself. Now, to satisfy all her elders such as Rukmini, she summarizes about all eight queens. "We eight queens cannot control him like other wives can control their husbands." She says this out of great humility. In fact, they are expansions of the Lord in the form of hladini sakti, and actually control him with prema.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Having described herself profusely out of enthusiasm, she now in embarrassment satisfies all the elder queens and concludes. Because of being complete in himself, he is qualified to perform pastimes only with himself. Still, we have become his household servants. The cause is only his mercy. She hides the boldness she showed in telling her story by indicating her humility as a servant, which indicates her bhakti.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

She now in embarrassment satisfies all the elder queens and concludes. We have become maidservants of the Lord, though he is detached from his (ātmārāmasya). This is stated out of humility, with special bhakti. We are household servants, cleaning the house. The suffix kāḥ indicates their inferior status. We are low servants, not wives. Being indifferent to all attachments (saṅga) to wealth and sons, and doing the austerity of servant’s work as a svadharma, we have become his maid servants. This includes the elder queens, and indicates their mutual affection. Or she uses the plural to show reverence for her own position as a household servant.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)
Related verses
By renouncing all material association and practicing penances, we queens became personal maidservants of the self-satisfied Lord. The path is real austerity; the goal is service position.
Reflection Questions
  • What renunciation would prepare me for the service position I actually want?
  • Where am I asking for the result without taking the path?

Lakṣmaṇā closes her narration with a wider 'we'. All the queens, however differently they arrived, have ended at the same place — gṛha-dāsikāḥ, household maidservants of the ātmārāma Lord, by tapasā and saṅga-nivṛtti. The chapter's polyphony resolves into a single chord: not 'I am queen of Dvārakā' but 'I am His sweeper in the house', because the house itself is the Lord.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.40

↗
महिष्य ऊचु: भौमं निहत्य सगणं युधि तेन रुद्धा ज्ञात्वाथ न: क्षितिजये जितराजकन्या: । निर्मुच्य संसृतिविमोक्षमनुस्मरन्ती: पादाम्बुजं परिणिनाय य आप्तकाम: ॥ ४० ॥
mahiṣya ūcuḥ
[mahishya oochuh]
bhaumaṁ nihatya sa-gaṇaṁ yudhi tena ruddhā
[bhaumam nihatya sa-ganam yudhi tena ruddhaa]
jñātvātha naḥ kṣiti-jaye jita-rāja-kanyāḥ
[jnaatvaatha nah kshiti-jaye jita-raaja-kanyaah]
nirmucya saṁsṛti-vimokṣam anusmarantīḥ
[nirmuchya samsriti-vimoksham anusmaranteeh]
pādāmbujaṁ pariṇināya ya āpta-kāmaḥ
[paadaambujam parininaaya ya aapta-kaamah]
mahiṣyaḥ ūcuḥ — the (other) queens said bhaumam — the demon Bhauma nihatya — killing sa — along with gaṇam — his followers yudhi — in battle tena — by him (Bhauma) ruddhāḥ — imprisoned jñātvā — knowing atha — then naḥ — us kṣiti - jaye — during (Bhauma’s) conquest of the earth jita — defeated rāja — of kings kanyāḥ — the daughters nirmucya — releasing saṁsṛti — from material existence vimokṣam — (the source of) liberation anusmarantīḥ — constantly remembering pāda - ambujam — His lotus feet pariṇināya — married yaḥ — who āpta - kāmaḥ — already fulfilled in all desires .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
mahiṣya ūcuḥ
mahiṣyaḥ ūcuḥ
the (other) queens said
bhaumaṁ nihatya sa-gaṇaṁ yudhi tena ruddhā
bhaumam
the demon Bhauma
nihatya
killing
sa
along with
gaṇam
his followers
yudhi
in battle
tena
by him (Bhauma)
ruddhāḥ
imprisoned
jñātvātha naḥ kṣiti-jaye jita-rāja-kanyāḥ
jñātvā
knowing
atha
then
naḥ
us
kṣiti - jaye
during (Bhauma’s) conquest of the earth
jita
defeated
rāja
of kings
kanyāḥ
the daughters
nirmucya saṁsṛti-vimokṣam anusmarantīḥ
nirmucya
releasing
saṁsṛti
from material existence
vimokṣam
(the source of) liberation
anusmarantīḥ
constantly remembering
pādāmbujaṁ pariṇināya ya āpta-kāmaḥ
pāda - ambujam
His lotus feet
pariṇināya
married
yaḥ
who
āpta - kāmaḥ
already fulfilled in all desires .
  • bhaumam — the demon Bhauma
    Bhauma — son of Bhūmi (Earth). The asura whose killing freed the sixteen thousand. Gauḍīya commentators note: even Bhauma was Bhūmi's son, hence a relative of Viṣṇu through Varāha-līlā — the demon is paradoxically family. The Lord's killing of him is also a familial correction.
  • anusmarantīḥ — constantly remembering
    Anu (continually) + smṛ (remember) + present participle feminine plural. The verse's central word. The captives' single practice in prison was anusmaraṇa — continuous remembrance. Gauḍīya śravaṇa-kīrtana-smaraṇa: smaraṇa is bhakti's interior limb. They had no external freedom but full interior smaraṇa.
  • pāda - ambujam — lotus feet
    Pāda (foot) + ambuja (lotus). The same compound as verse 3's caraṇa-ambuja and verses 8, 11, 12, 15-16, 39, 41-42, 43's variations. The chapter's deepest object: every queen, by every route, has been anchored to pāda-ambuja.
  • saṁsṛti - vimokṣam — (the source of) liberation from material existence
    Saṁsṛti (the flow of births and deaths) + vimokṣa (liberation). The queens names Kṛṣṇa's pāda-ambuja as the source of saṁsṛti-vimokṣa. Yet they do not ask for vimokṣa itself — they ask for the feet that produce it. Gauḍīya: take the source, not the by-product.
  • āpta - kāmaḥ — He whose every desire is already fulfilled
    Āpta (obtained) + kāma (desire). Same theological category as ātmārāma (verse 39). Bhagavān married sixteen thousand wives though He needed none of them — pure responsive sevā-acceptance, not need. Gauḍīya: the Lord accepts because the bhakta longs, not because He lacks.
Rohiṇī-devi, speaking for the other queens, said: After killing Bhaumāsura and his followers, the Lord found us in the demon’s prison and could understand that we were the daughters of the kings whom Bhauma had defeated during his conquest of the earth. The Lord set us free, and because we had been constantly meditating upon His lotus feet, the source of liberation from material entanglement, He agreed to marry us, though His every desire is already fulfilled.

Rohiṇī-devī was one of the nine queens questioned by Draupadī in texts 6 and 7, and thus it is assumed that she speaks here, representing the 16,099 other queens. Śrīla Prabhupāda confirms this in Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Rohiṇī-devi, speaking for the other queens, said: After killing Bhaumāsura and his followers, the Lord found us in the demon's prison and could understand that we were the daughters of the kings whom Bhauma had defeated during his conquest of the earth. The Lord set us free, and because we had been constantly meditating upon His lotus feet, the source of liberation from material entanglement, He agreed to marry us, though His every desire is already fulfilled.
Commentary

"We desire the foot dust of he who, though full in his desires, freed and accepted as his wives the daughters of kings, knowing that they had been imprisoned by Bhauma when he defeated the kings while he conquered the earth." The verb kamayamahe is two verses later. "He married us because we were constantly remembering his lotus feet, which cause liberation from material life (samsrti vimoksam). For this reason he freed us from the prison."

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Three verses are grammatically related. We desire the dust of lotus feet of he (etasya, verse 42) who married us (verse 40). Since he was the son of the earth, Bhauma could not normally be killed. However Kṛṣṇa killed him decisively (ni—hatya) in battle, since he also killed his followers. “Why did he kill the son of the earth?” He understood that we were imprisoned by him. This means that other reasons were secondary. After killing Bhauma he then freed us completely from bondage (nirmucya), taking us to Dvārakā. They indicate their superiority to those who have knowledge of the Lord as a cause of being freed: we constantly remembered his lotus feet which cause liberation from saṁsāra. Thus we were liberated from its suffering (vi—moksāṇam), what to speak of delivering us from his imprisonment. Though he has all his desires fulfilled, he married us. They indicated his great mercy by this. Or, though he is full in his desires he married us to free us from saṁsāra, what to speak of delivering us from material happiness in this life and the next. Remembering his lotus feet we have no desire at all for material wealth.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Since he was the son of the earth, Bhauma could not normally be killed. However Kṛṣṇa killed him decisively (ni—hatya) in battle, since he also killed his followers. Or the prefix ni indicates that he was killed and did not take birth again. He attained liberation. His sequence of deaths was terminated. He was killed in order to deliver us. That was the reason he was killed. Or after killing Bhauma, immediately we were released completely (nir-mucya), being sent to Dvārakā. The reason for releasing them or for recognizing them is given. We continually remembered his lotus feet, which completely free one from the suffering of saṁsāra, rather than just delaying it. Though he is self-satisfied, he married us. This indicates his great mercy. Or though he who is self-satisfied married us, he liberated Bhauma. Thus we do not desire any wealth.

Related values
Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomAbhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)Ahimsa (Non-violence / Compassion)Anahankarah (Freedom from False Ego)Daksya (Resourcefulness / Skill)
Related verses
Concepts
Moksha
Rohiṇī: Kṛṣṇa found us in Bhauma's prison, recognized us as the daughters of conquered kings, freed us — and because we were constantly meditating on His feet, He accepted us. Sustained meditation, even in prison, is recognized.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'prison' meditation of mine is being noticed even when I cannot see it?
  • How does this image steady me when I feel forgotten?

Rohiṇī speaks for the sixteen thousand. They were not won by svayaṁvara or earned by tapas or given by fathers — they were captives of Bhaumāsura, daughters of conquered kings, locked in his fortress with one continuous practice: anusmaraṇa of Kṛṣṇa's pāda-ambuja. When the Lord killed Bhauma and entered the prison, He found sixteen thousand bhaktas, every one of whom had been keeping Him in mind. He married them all. The route is anusmṛti — the captive's remembrance.

The killing of Bhaumāsura

In SB 10.59, Bhaumāsura (Narakāsura), son of Bhūmi, had conquered the earth and abducted sixteen thousand one hundred princesses, imprisoning them in his mountain-fortress Prāgjyotiṣapura.

Kṛṣṇa, with Satyabhāmā beside Him on Garuḍa, killed Bhauma, freed the princesses, and — because they had been remembering Him as the deliverer all the while — accepted them as His wives, returning them not to their fathers (who had been killed) but to the palaces He expanded for them in Dvārakā. Rohiṇī's verse here is their corporate testimony. The route is the captive's anusmaraṇa — the remembrance that begins not with svayaṁvara but with imprisonment.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.41-42

↗
न वयं साध्वि साम्राज्यं स्वाराज्यं भौज्यमप्युत । वैराज्यं पारमेष्ठ्यं च आनन्त्यं वा हरे: पदम् ॥ ४१ ॥ कामयामह एतस्य श्रीमत्पादरज: श्रिय: । कुचकुङ्कुमगन्धाढ्यं मूर्ध्ना वोढुं गदाभृत: ॥ ४२ ॥
na vayaṁ sādhvi sāmrājyaṁ
[na vayam saadhvi saamraajyam]
svārājyaṁ bhaujyam apy uta
[svaaraajyam bhaujyam apy uta]
vairājyaṁ pārameṣṭhyaṁ ca
[vairaajyam paarameshthyam cha]
ānantyaṁ vā hareḥ padam
[aanantyam vaa hareh padam]
kāmayāmaha etasya
[kaamayaamaha etasya]
śrīmat-pāda-rajaḥ śriyaḥ
[shreemat-paada-rajah shriyah]
kuca-kuṅkuma-gandhāḍhyaṁ
[kucha-kunkuma-gandhaadhyam]
mūrdhnā voḍhuṁ gadā-bhṛtaḥ
[moordhnaa vodhum gadaa-bhritah]
na — not vayam — we sādhvi — O saintly lady (Draupadī) sāmrājyam — rulership over the entire earth sva - rājyam — the position of Lord Indra, King of heaven bhaujyam — unlimited powers of enjoyment api uta — even vairājyam — mystic power pārameṣṭhyam — the position of Lord Brahmā, creator of the universe ca — and ānantyam — immortality vā — or hareḥ — of the Supreme Lord padam — the abode kāmayāmahe — we desire etasya — His śrī - mat — divine pāda — of the feet rajaḥ — the dust śrīyaḥ — of the goddess of fortune kuca — from the breast kuṅkuma — of the cosmetic powder gandha — by the fragrance āḍhyam — enriched mūrdhnā — on our heads voḍhum — to carry gadābhṛtaḥ — of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the wielder of the club .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
na vayaṁ sādhvi sāmrājyaṁ
na
not
vayam
we
sādhvi
O saintly lady (Draupadī)
sāmrājyam
rulership over the entire earth
svārājyaṁ bhaujyam apy uta
sva - rājyam
the position of Lord Indra, King of heaven
bhaujyam
unlimited powers of enjoyment
api uta
even
vairājyaṁ pārameṣṭhyaṁ ca
vairājyam
mystic power
pārameṣṭhyam
the position of Lord Brahmā, creator of the universe
ca
and
ānantyaṁ vā hareḥ padam
ānantyam
immortality
vā
or
hareḥ
of the Supreme Lord
padam
the abode
kāmayāmaha etasya
kāmayāmahe
we desire
etasya
His
śrīmat-pāda-rajaḥ śriyaḥ
śrī - mat
divine
pāda
of the feet
rajaḥ
the dust
śrīyaḥ
of the goddess of fortune
kuca-kuṅkuma-gandhāḍhyaṁ
kuca
from the breast
kuṅkuma
of the cosmetic powder
gandha
by the fragrance
āḍhyam
enriched
mūrdhnā voḍhuṁ gadā-bhṛtaḥ
mūrdhnā
on our heads
voḍhum
to carry
gadābhṛtaḥ
of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the wielder of the club .
  • hareḥ padam — the abode of Hari (i.e., Vaikuṇṭha)
    Hari (the Lord) + pada (abode). Vaikuṇṭha itself is named and dismissed — the queens do not want even mokṣa-as-locality. Gauḍīya bhakti's most radical refusal: the heaven of the Lord is less than the dust of the Lord's foot.
  • śrīyaḥ - kuca - kuṅkuma - gandha - āḍhyam — enriched by the fragrance of kuṅkuma from Śrī's breast
    Śrī (Lakṣmī, here Rukmiṇī) + kuca (breast) + kuṅkuma (saffron powder) + gandha (fragrance) + āḍhya (enriched). The queens want the foot-dust precisely because Śrī's kuṅkuma has scented it. Gauḍīya rasa-detail: the foot-dust acquires extra mādhurya because Lakṣmī's chest has touched it. Mādhurya is communicable.
  • pāda - rajaḥ — the dust of the feet
    Pāda (foot) + rajas (dust). The single object of all queens' want. Gauḍīya commentators note: dust is what falls off; it is the most expendable trace of the Lord. To want the dust is to want even the residue. The verse ends every higher request at this most minimal item.
  • mūrdhnā voḍhum — to carry on (our) heads
    Mūrdhan (head) + voḍhum (to carry, infinitive of √vah). The dust goes on the head, the highest point of the body. Gauḍīya iconography: pāda-rajaḥ-arpaṇa — placing dust on the head — is the disciple's symbolic gesture to the guru and to the Lord.
  • gadābhṛtaḥ — of the wielder of the club
    Gadā (club) + bhṛt (bearer). A title for Viṣṇu/Kṛṣṇa. The verse closes with this title — the same Lord who killed Bhauma with the club is the one whose foot-dust the queens want. Gauḍīya: aiśvarya and mādhurya in the same compound.
  • sādhvi — O saintly lady
    Vocative of sādhvī. The queens address Draupadī one last time as fellow sādhvī. The whole confession is offered between equals — sister-queens, sister-bhaktas — not as a teaching but as a shared admission.
O saintly lady, we do not desire dominion over the earth, the sovereignty of the King of heaven, unlimited facility for enjoyment, mystic power, the position of Lord Brahmā, immortality or even attainment of the kingdom of God. We simply desire to carry on our heads the glorious dust of Lord Kṛṣṇa’s feet, enriched by the fragrance of kuṅkuma from His consort’s bosom.

The verb rāj means “to rule,” and from it are derived the words sāmrājyam, meaning “rulership over the entire earth,” and svārājyam, meaning “rulership over heaven.” Bhaujyam comes from the verb bhuj, “to enjoy,” and thus refers to the capacity of enjoying whatever one desires. Virāṭ is explained by Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī as representing the phrase vividhaṁ virājate (“one enjoys many kinds of opulence”) and specifically indicating the eight mystic perfections of aṇimā and so on. An alternative explanation of these terms is given by Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī, who says that according to the Bahv-ṛca Brāhmaṇa, these four terms designate the power of sovereignty over each of the four cardinal directions: sāmrājya for the East, bhaujya for the South, svārājya for the West, and vairājya for the North. Lord Kṛṣṇa’s queens clearly state that they do not desire any of these powers, or even the position of Brahmā, liberation or entrance into the kingdom of God. They simply want the dust from Śrī Kṛṣṇa’s feet, which Goddess Śrī herself worships. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī tells us that the goddess of fortune mentioned here is not Lakṣmī, the consort of Nārāyaṇa. After all, the ācārya explains, Goddess Lakṣmī could not attain the direct association of Kṛṣṇa even after performing extended austerities, as Uddhava states: nāyaṁ śrīyo ’ṅga u nitānta-rateḥ prasādaḥ ( Bhāg. 10.47.60 ). Rather, the Śrī referred to here is the supreme goddess of fortune identified by the Bṛhad-gautamīya-tantra: devī kṛṣṇa-mayī proktā rādhikā para-devatā sarva-lakṣmī-mayī sarva kāntiḥ sammohinī parā “The transcendental goddess Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī is the direct counterpart of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa. She is the central figure for all the goddesses of fortune. She possesses all the attractiveness to attract the all-attractive Personality of Godhead. She is the primeval internal potency of the Lord.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
O saintly lady, we do not desire dominion over the earth, the sovereignty of the King of heaven, unlimited facility for enjoyment, mystic power, the position of Lord Brahmā, immortality or even attainment of the kingdom of God. We simply desire to carry on our heads the glorious dust of Lord Kṛṣṇa's feet, enriched by the fragrance of kuṅkuma from His consort's bosom.
Commentary

"If that is so, then Krsna will fulfill all your desires, as you have surrendered to his lotus feet." "We do not want lordship of the earth, of Indraloka (sva rajyam), nor the enjoyment of all material pleasures ( bhaujyam), nor the enjoyment of siddhis (virajyam vividha rajate) , nor the position of Brahman ( paramesthyam), nor liberation (anantyam), nor any of the other types of liberation such as living on the same planet as Hari (hari padam)." " Then what do you want?’ "We want the dust of Krsna’s (etasya) lotus feet, anointed with the fragrance of kumkuma from the breast of Sri (srimat padarajah)." It is not appropriate to say that Sri means the wife of Narayan, Laksmi, in this context. The wives of Kaliya said about Laksmi, "The goddess of fortune performed austerities for centuries, giving up all other desires and taking austere vows to get your feet on her head." sb 10.16.36 From this it is understood that she had a desire for Krsna. Uddhava has said, "The gopīs received benedictions from the Lord that neither Lakmidevi nor the most beautiful dancers in the heavenly planets could attain" SB10.47.60 From this we can understand that she never received that benediction.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We simply desire to be his servants. This is expressed in two verses. O Draupadī, fixed in vows to your husbands (sādhvi)! You will understand this. Bhaujyam means material enjoyment. This sequence of enjoyment follows the list in the Bahvṛca-brāhmaṇa. We do not desire enjoyment nor great mystic powers (vairājyam). The order of enjoyment is with increasing excellence. He is called gadā-bhrtaḥ because he used his club to kill Nāraka. Gadayā nirbibhedādrīn: with his club the Lord broke through the rock fortifications. (SB 10.59.4) Prākāraṁ gadayā gurvyā nirbibheda gadādharaḥ: with his heavy club he demolished the surrounding earthen ramparts. (SB 10.59.6) We desire the dust of even one of his feet which holds all wealth (śrimat). Or śrimāt can modify the dust. Those feet are enriched with the fragrance of kuṁkuma from the breast of Lakṣmī (Rādhā). The queens indicate by this Kṛṣṇa’s supreme position.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

We simply desire to be his servants. This is expressed in two verses. O Draupadī, fixed in vows to your husbands (sādhvi)! You will understand this. We do not even (uta api) desire liberation (vairājyam) or the abode of the Lord, who is most attractive (hareḥ). His feet are even more attractive. The list of items is in order of increasing excellence. He is called gadā-bhrtaḥ because he used his club to kill Nāraka. Gadayā nirbibhedādrīn: with his club the Lord broke through the rock fortifications. (SB 10.59.4) Prākāraṁ gadayā gurvyā nirbibheda gadādharaḥ: with his heavy club he demolished the surrounding earthen ramparts. (SB 10.59.6) Or he protects his younger brotherGada completely (gada ā-bhṛtaḥ). This indicates his affection for his friends. We desire only one particle of dust from one of his feet. The foot is endowed with all wealth (śrī). Or the particle of dust is endowed with all wealth. By attaining that particle all wealth is attained. What else can we desire? They give proof. The foot is enhanced by the fragrance of kuṁkuma from Lakṣmī’ breast. Because of the special rasa, it then becomes greater. When it is attained by the devotees it becomes even greater. We desire to put that foot on our heads. This shows their great devotion as maid servants.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)Samata (Equanimity / Even-mindedness)
Related verses
We do not desire earthly rule, heaven, mystic power, Brahmā's position, immortality, or even Vaikuṇṭha — only to carry the dust of Kṛṣṇa's feet, enriched by His consort's kuṅkuma, on our heads.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'big' goals am I chasing that pale beside this simple, intimate desire?
  • What would it mean to make the dust my actual aim?

The queens' culminating refusal is a list. Not rulership of the earth, not Indra's throne, not unlimited enjoyment, not yogic powers, not Brahmā's position, not immortality, not even Vaikuṇṭha — they refuse them all. What they want is the dust of His feet, scented with the kuṅkuma from His consort's breast. The list is the densest Gauḍīya statement in Canto 10: every external boon is named and dismissed in favor of a single sensory detail of pāda-sevā.

Prahlāda's refusal

In SB 7.10, the boy Prahlāda, offered any boon by Nṛsiṁhadeva — kingdom, immortality, dominion — refused them all. He asked instead for freedom from desire itself, and for the company of pure devotees. Bhagavān grilled him: 'But the boon-giver wishes to give a boon — name something!' Prahlāda's answer was the same as these queens': anything but Your feet would be a loss.

The queens' verse here is corporate Prahlāda. The same Gauḍīya doctrine — that bhakti refuses every other gift in order to keep the giver — is here said by sixteen thousand voices in chorus, with the added intimacy of naming Śrī's kuṅkuma on the feet's dust as the actual object of longing.

📝 My note

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.83.43

↗
व्रजस्‍त्रियो यद् वाञ्छन्ति पुलिन्द्यस्तृणवीरुध: । गावश्चारयतो गोपा: पदस्पर्शं महात्मन: ॥ ४३ ॥
vraja-striyo yad vāñchanti
[vraja-striyo yad vaanchanti]
pulindyas tṛṇa-vīrudhaḥ
[pulindyas trina-veerudhah]
gāvaś cārayato gopāḥ
[gaavash chaarayato gopaah]
pada-sparśaṁ mahātmanaḥ
[pada-sparsham mahaatmanah]
vraja — of Vraja striyaḥ — the women yat — as vāñchanti — they desire pulindyaḥ — the women of the aborigine Pulinda tribe in Vraja tṛṇa — from the grass vīrudhaḥ — and plants gāvaḥ — the cows cārayataḥ — who is grazing gopāḥ — the cowherd boys pāda — of the feet sparśam — the touch mahā - ātmanaḥ — of the Supreme Soul .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
vraja-striyo yad vāñchanti
vraja
of Vraja
striyaḥ
the women
yat
as
vāñchanti
they desire
pulindyas tṛṇa-vīrudhaḥ
pulindyaḥ
the women of the aborigine Pulinda tribe in Vraja
tṛṇa
from the grass
vīrudhaḥ
and plants
gāvaś cārayato gopāḥ
gāvaḥ
the cows
cārayataḥ
who is grazing
gopāḥ
the cowherd boys
pada-sparśaṁ mahātmanaḥ
pāda
of the feet
sparśam
the touch
mahā - ātmanaḥ
of the Supreme Soul .
  • vraja - striyaḥ — the women of Vraja (the gopīs)
    Vraja (cowherd village) + strī (woman). The mādhurya-bhaktas of the Bhāgavatam's central canto. The Dvārakā-queens explicitly look back to Vraja and want what the gopīs want. Gauḍīya doctrine: the gopīs' bhakti is the highest standard, against which even Lakṣmī's mood and the queens' devotion measure themselves.
  • pulindyaḥ — the women of the Pulinda tribe
    Pulinda — an aboriginal forest tribe of Vraja's outskirts. The Bhāgavatam's most striking democratization: tribal forest-women are placed in the same bhakti-category as the great queens. Gauḍīya commentators note: bhakti has no varṇa-restriction; the dust falls equally on Pulinda grass and Dvārakā marble.
  • gopāḥ — the cowherd boys
    Gopa — Kṛṣṇa's sakhya-bhaktas. The queens include the cowherd boys in the list of those they want to resemble. Sakhya, mādhurya, and the wild Pulinda-mood are all enumerated together — bhakti's full rasa-spectrum at the chapter's close.
  • tṛṇa - vīrudhaḥ — from the grass and herbs
    Tṛṇa (grass) + vīrudh (herb, creeper). The exact substrate where the foot-dust comes to rest. The queens want the touch left on grass and herbs, not on jewelled floors. Gauḍīya: bhakti's prized texture is the rough Vraja grass, not the palace's polish.
  • cārayataḥ — of (Him) who is grazing (the cows)
    Present participle of √car (caus.) — 'causing to move, grazing'. Kṛṣṇa is named here in His Govinda-occupation: cow-grazer. Of all His activities — Bhauma-killing, kings-defeating, queens-marrying — the queens choose the cow-grazing moment as the one whose dust they want. The chapter's last word on the Lord is His Vraja-occupation.
  • mahā - ātmanaḥ — of the Great Soul
    Mahā (great) + ātman (soul, self). A title for Bhagavān as the all-encompassing person. Gauḍīya: even as the queens specify cow-grazing Vraja-Kṛṣṇa, they name Him mahā-ātman — the same cow-grazing boy is the Supreme Self. Vraja-rasa does not diminish; it expands.
We desire the same contact with the Supreme Lord’s feet that the young women of Vraja, the cowherd boys and even the aborigine Pulinda women desire — the touch of the dust He leaves on the plants and grass as He tends His cows.

Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī reminds us of the jealous rivalry that always existed between the queens of Dvārakā and the gopīs of Vraja. The gopīs considered the sophisticated women of Dvārakā the most serious threat to their hold on Śrī Kṛṣṇa, confessing their anxiety to Uddhava: kasmāt kṛṣṇa ihāyāti prāpta-rājyo hatāhitaḥ/ narendra-kanyā udvāhya. “Why should Kṛṣṇa come back here after winning a kingdom, killing His enemies and marrying the daughters of kings?” ( Bhāg. 10.47.45 ) Rukmiṇī and her seven chief co-wives considered themselves so fortunate in their relationship with Kṛṣṇa as He appeared in Dvārakā that they did not especially desire to see Him as He is in Vṛndāvana. But the sixteen thousand lesser queens, after hearing Uddhava describe Śrī Rādhā’s superexcellent qualities, became attracted to touch the dust that falls from Kṛṣṇa’s feet onto the grass and plants of Vṛndāvana. Śrīla Viśvanātha Cakravartī indicates that some commentators give this as the reason why, after the mauṣala-līlā, these sixteen thousand queens were stolen from Arjuna on the road by Lord Kṛṣṇa Himself in the disguise of sixteen thousand cowherds, who then took them away to Gokula. Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Eighty-third Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled “Draupadī Meets the Queens of Kṛṣṇa.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
We desire the same contact with the Supreme Lord's feet that the young women of Vraja, the cowherd boys and even the aborigine Pulinda women desire—the touch of the dust He leaves on the plants and grass as He tends His cows.
Commentary

Sri cannot refer to Rukmini either. This verse says that the women of Vraja desire this foot dust. The gopis said, "But why should Krsna come here after winning a kingdom, killing His enemies and marrying the daughters of kings? He’s satisfied there, surrounded by all His friends and well-wishers." Sb 10.47.45 The gopis said this with envy towards Rukmini and others as they are competitors for Krsna’s love. Thus , they could not have desire for anything related to her. Devi krsna mayi prokta radhika paradevata sarva lakmimayi sarvakantih sammohini para. Radha is the same as Krsna, the superem diety, containing within her all Laksmis, all beauty and supreme attractiveness. This verse from the Brhad Gautamiya Tantra shows that Sri can also refer to Radhika. "The women of Vraja, Radha’s friends and intimate companions, desire the lotus feet of Krsna anointed with that kumkuma from her breasts. And the Pulinda women, taking it from the grass and plants (trna virudhah) on which that kumkuma was smeared, desire it also. (sb 10.21.17) . The cowherd boys herding the cows, great souls, refers to the priya narma sakhas. Some of them such as Subala having thoughts of attaining sentiments like the gopis, also desire that foot dust. Not only do all of these inhabitants of Vraja desire such foot dust, but they also desire the touch of those same feet (padasparsam). We also aspire for the touch of such feet." Padasparsam can also be a modifier of the foot dust which touches his feet. Thus the meaning would be "The gopis desire the dust which touches his feet." From the day that Uddhava, talking about prema rasa, described the excellence of Sri Radha’s form, prema, good fortune, sweetness, and her ability to control Krsna to the assembly of women, outside of Krsna’s presence, such a desire also arouse in them. The eight queens headed by Rukmini felt themselves satisfied with their own good fortune and excellence and therefore did not develop that desire. However that deisre did arise in the sixteen thousand queens who were of less good fortune than the eight queens. Thus some say that after Krsna disappeared, taking the form of sixteen thousand cowherd men, he took the sixteen thousand queens from Arjuna on the road, and brought them to Gokula.

Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Lakṣmī is better than all women. How will you attain what she attains? He is attained by greatness of prema not by greatness of being a women or anything else. It has previously been said the Pulinda women had their desires fulfilled. (SB 10.21.17) Similarly the grass and bushes, the creepers and trees growing in Vṛndāvana had their desires fulfilled. (SB 10.35.9) The women of Vraja, the Pulindas, the trees and creepers and the cowherds all desire the touch of his feet. The degree of prema is from superior (women of Vraja) to lesser. The women of Vraja desire that touch, what to speak of the Pulindas. The creepers (vīrudhaḥ) are the best of plants (tṛṇa) because of having intimate contract with him when he herds the cows. What can be said? They all (female gender) desire that touch. The cowherds (males) desire the touch of his feet in order to massage them. They desire the touch of the feet of Kṛṣṇa who spreads everywhere by his power (mahātmanaḥ) and herds the cows by his mercy. Śrīdhara Svāmī says that verse 41 is in answer to the question “Since you household women enjoy all wealth, why do you desire him?” They have desire for nothing but him. Verse 42 is in answer to the question, “Why do you desire the dust from his feet? If you do not desire anything else, why do you also desire the dust?” Another meaning is as follows. Concerning verse 41, śruti (Taittirīya Upaniṣad) speaks of various degrees of happiness starting with that of humans. If human happiness is multiplied ten thousand times it is the happiness of Brahmā. This is the highest happiness. The happiness of parabrahman is unlimited (ānantyam). Yato vāco nivartante: words cannot describe it. (Taittirīya Upaniṣad) What then to speak of the happiness of sāmīpya with the Lord, the husband of Lakṣmī? We do not desire any of those things, even secondarily. We do not want them as secondary goals. “What do you desire to attain more than that?” We desire to carry that dust of his feet on our heads. We take him as our husband. Moreover, we desire those feet possessing the fragrance of Lakṣmī’s kumkuma. “But you have given up the foot of the husband of Lakṣmī perfumed with her kuṁkuma. If śrī means Rukmiṇī, you have attained that foot dust with her kuṁkuma.” To make this understood, they then speak the present verse. pūrṇāḥ pulindya urugāya-padābja-rāga śrī-kuṅkumena dayitā-stana-maṇḍitena tad-darśana-smara-rujas tṛṇa-rūṣitena limpantya ānana-kuceṣu jahus tad-ādhim The aborigine women of the Vṛndāvana area become disturbed by lust when they see the grass marked with reddish kuṅkuma powder. Endowed with the color of Kṛṣṇa’s lotus feet, this powder originally decorated the breasts of his beloveds, and when the aborigine women smear it on their faces and breasts, they feel fully satisfied and give up all their anxiety. SB 10.21.17 According to these words, the queens desire what the women of Vraja desire. The present tense is used to show continuous desire. In listing the Pulinda women and others, the queens desire to state their qualification for attaining that dust. They desired what the plants obtained: kevalena hi bhāvena gopyo gāvo nagā mṛgāḥ ye ’nye mūḍha-dhiyo nāgāḥ siddhā mām īyur añjasā The inhabitants of Vṛndāvana, including the gopīs, cows, unmoving creatures such as the twin arjuna trees, animals, living entities with stunted consciousness such as bushes and thickets, and snakes such as Kāliya, all achieved the perfection of life by unalloyed love for me and thus very easily achieved me. SB 11.12.8 Some of the cowherds herding the cows were priya-sakhas. Though they also took pleasure in such dust, they were unqualified since they were males. Thus they are placed last in the list. The meaning is this. She who is famous as Lakṣmī desired this also, but she did not attain it. The wives of Kāliya say: kasyānubhāvo ’sya na deva vidmahe tavāṅghri-reṇu-sparaśādhikāraḥ yad-vāñchayā śrīr lalanācarat tapo vihāya kāmān su-ciraṁ dhṛta-vratā O Lord, we do not know how the serpent Kāliya has attained this great opportunity of being touched by the dust of your lotus feet. For this end, the goddess of fortune performed austerities for centuries, giving up all other desires and taking austere vows. SB 10 16.37 Rukmiṇī who is famous as Śrī also did not attain it, since she was not a woman of Vraja, belonging to a different time and place. The desire of Lakṣmī is also stated in the following: nāyaṁ śriyo ’ṅga u nitānta-rateḥ prasādaḥ svar-yoṣitāṁ nalina-gandha-rucāṁ kuto ’nyāḥ rāsotsave ’sya bhuja-daṇḍa-gṛhīta-kaṇṭha- labdhāśiṣāṁ ya udagād vraja-sundarīṇām The gopīs received benedictions from the Lord that neither Lakṣmī nor the most beautiful dancers in the heavenly planets could attain. In the rāsa dance, the Lord showed his favor to the most fortunate gopīs by placing his arms on their shoulders and dancing with each of them individually. No one can compare with the gopīs, who received the causeless mercy of the Lord. SB 10.47.60 It is said that the women of Vraja more qualified than Rukmiṇī. In Skanda Purāṇa it is said rukmiṇī dvāravatyāṁ tu rādhā vṛndāvane vane: Rukmiṇī is in Dvārakā what Rādhā is in the forest of Vṛndāvana. devī kṛṣṇa-mayī proktā rādhikā para-devatā sarva-lakṣmī-mayī sarva kāntiḥ sammohinī parā The goddess Rādhārāṇī is the direct counterpart of Kṛṣṇa. She is the embodiment of all the goddesses of fortune. She possesses all attractiveness to attract the Lord. Gautamīya-tantra Bṛhad-gautamīya-tantra also says that Rādhā is supreme among all the gopīs and reigns as Śrī. The gopīs also describe Rādhā: anayārādhito nūnaṁ bhagavān harir īśvaraḥ yan no vihāya govindaḥ prīto yām anayad rahaḥ Certainly this particular gopī has perfectly worshiped the all-powerful Govinda, since he was so pleased with her that he abandoned the rest of us and brought her to a secluded place. SB 10.30.28 apy eṇa-patny upagataḥ priyayeha gātrais tanvan dṛśāṁ sakhi su-nirvṛtim acyuto vaḥ kāntāṅga-saṅga-kuca-kuṅkuma-rañjitāyāḥ kunda-srajaḥ kula-pater iha vāti gandhaḥ O friend, wife of the deer, has Acyuta been here with his beloved, bringing great joy to your eyes? Indeed, blowing this way is the fragrance of his garland of kunda flowers, which was smeared with the kuṅkuma from the breasts of his girlfriend when he embraced her. SB 10.30.11 Thus the queens desire what the gopīs desired. The queens desired that there would be an appearance of his feet perfumed with kuṁkuma with an appearance of similar prema. Not only did they desire the foot dust but they desired a similar touch of his feet. We also desire him. Or, we desire the touch of his feet with its dust. There is non-difference of the two since both have unfailing results. Kṛṣṇa’s nature is to have the best manifestation (ātmanaḥ) of beauty and other equalities which spread everywhere (mahā). Ṣukadeva says: tatrātiśuśubhe tābhir bhagavān devakī-sutaḥ madhye maṇīnāṁ haimānāṁ mahā-marakato yathā In the midst of the dancing gopīs, Kṛṣṇa appeared most brilliant, like an exquisite sapphire in the midst of golden ornaments. SB 10.33.6

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

It has previously been said that the Pulinda women had their desires fulfilled. (SB 10.21.17) Similarly the grass and bushes, the creepers and trees growing in Vṛndāvana had their desires fulfilled. (SB 10.35.9) The list starts with the most excellent of those who desired the dust with prema, the women of Vraja. The women of Vraja desired that dust, what to speak of the Pulinda women. The grass is superior to the bushes since the grass more readily receives that dust while Kṛṣṇa herds the cows. What can be said? They all (female gender) desire that touch. The cowherds (males) desire the touch of his feet in order to massage them. By prema they can attain that dust. The cause of their desire is explained. He has sweet pastimes. Though he is full of powers (mahātmanaḥ) he herds the cows (gāva’c cārantaḥ). Or he herds cows because he is the great lord (mahātmanaḥ). “Since you household women enjoy all wealth, why do you desire him?” They have desire for nothing but him. Or one should see their statement “We do not desire any wealth at all.” We desire only this. They explain the reason in this verse. The repetition of statements is resolved. Or though the foot dust is endowed with fragrance of kuṁkuṁa from the breast of Ṛukmiṇī or Lakṣmī, we desire the dust, though we compete with her. This verse gives the reason. The gopīs also desire that dust. The gopīs attained greater mercy than Lakṣmī: nāyaṁ śriyo ’ṅga u nitānta-rateḥ prasādaḥ svar-yoṣitāṁ nalina-gandha-rucāṁ kuto ’nyāḥ rāsotsave ’sya bhuja-daṇḍa-gṛhīta-kaṇṭha- labdhāśiṣāṁ ya udagād vraja-sundarīṇām The gopīs received benedictions from the Lord that neither Lakṣmī nor the most beautiful dancers in the heavenly planets could attain. In the rāsa dance, the Lord showed his favor to the most fortunate gopīs by placing his arms on their shoulders and dancing with each of them individually. No one can compare with the gopīs, who received the causeless mercy of the Lord. SB 10.47.60 That the gopīs desired that dust shows its special greatness. “The gopīs were qualified because they had special sweet prema which was most intense. How can you desire that dust when you are not qualified?” They answer, “Even the Pulinda women and cow herd boys desire it.” By his mercy we can also attain it. That mercy is described. He has eternal qualities (mahātmanaḥ) like compassion. Thus he herds the cows (gāś cārantaḥ). Or he reveals everything of his nature as bhagavān to you (mahātmanaḥ). Draupadī and others were finally satisfied. Or we do not desire a kingdom or liberation because (yat) the women of Vraja, though superior to Lakṣmī in good fortune, desired only his foot dust. Thus we, like them, desire only the touch of his feet, as he herds cows in Vṛndāvana. “As the rarest attainment, you should not desire it.” That is true, but though rare, we desire it just as the Pulinda women desired it. Just as the gopīs and cowherds in Vṛndāvana desire it though it is rare, so we also desire it here. Though we think about it, we cannot give up that desire. Or since the women of Vraja desire only the touch of his feet as he herds cows, we do not desire a kingdom. Rather we also desire the foot dust of he who herds cows. Though they had the good fortune to marry the Lord, they speak as eternal servants, giving up their identity as wives of the lord, out of humility, because of great bhakti. Thus end the purports of the humble servants of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda to the Tenth Canto, Eighty-third Chapter, of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, entitled "Draupadī Meets the Queens of Kṛṣṇa." 10.84: The Sages' Teachings at Kurukṣetra verses: Summary, 1, 2-5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24-25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32-33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44-45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55-56, 57-58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67-68, 69, 70, 71 Chapter Summary This chapter describes the arrival of great sages at Kurukṣetra to observe the auspicious occasion of a solar eclipse, the sages' glorification of Lord Kṛṣṇa, and Vasudeva's enthusiastic performance of sacrifices. On the occasion of a solar eclipse at Kurukṣetra, exalted ladies like Kuntī, Draupadī and Subhadrā got the chance to associate with Lord Kṛṣṇa's queens. Seeing how much the Lord's consorts loved their husband, the ladies were struck with wonder. As the women talked among themselves, and the men did likewise, great sages headed by Nārada and Vyāsadeva arrived there, desiring to see Lord Kṛṣṇa. The various kings and other leading personalities who were sitting at their leisure, including the Pāṇḍavas, Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma, stood up as soon as they saw the sages. The leaders all bowed down to the great souls, inquired about their well-being and worshiped them by offering them sitting places, water and so on. Lord Kṛṣṇa then said, "Now our lives are successful, for we have obtained the goal of life: the audience of great sages and yoga masters, which even demigods only rarely obtain. The water at a holy place of pilgrimage and the deity forms of the gods can purify one only after a long time, but saintly sages purify just by being seen. Those who identify themselves with their bodies and neglect to honor transcendental sages like you are no better than asses." After hearing Lord Kṛṣṇa speak these words in the mood of a mere mortal, the sages remained silent for some time, bewildered. Then they said, "How amazing our Lord is! He covers His true identity with humanlike activities and pretends to be subject to superior control. Surely He has spoken in this way only to enlighten the general populace. Such behavior of His is indeed inconceivable." The sages continued to glorify the Lord as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Supersoul, and the friend and worshiper of the brāhmaṇas. After the sages had praised Him, Lord Kṛṣṇa offered them His obeisances, and they begged His permission to return to their hermitages. But just then Vasudeva came forward, bowed to the sages and asked, "What activities can one perform to be freed from the bondage of fruitive work?" The sages replied, "By worshiping the Supreme Lord, Hari, through the performance of Vedic sacrifices, you will become free from the bondage of fruitive work." Vasudeva then requested the sages to act as his priests, and he arranged for Vedic sacrifices to be performed with superexcellent paraphernalia. Afterward, Vasudeva presented the priests with valuable gifts of cows and jewelry, and also with marriageable brāhmaṇa girls. He then performed the ritual bath marking the end of the sacrifice and fed everyone sumptuously, even the village dogs. Next he gave ample gifts to his relatives, the various kings and others, who all took Śrī Kṛṣṇa's leave and returned to their own homes. Unable to depart because of his intense affection for his relatives, Nanda Mahārāja remained at Kurukṣetra for three months, served with reverence by the Yādavas. On one occasion, Vasudeva began to describe the deep friendship Nanda had shown him, shedding tears openly. At the end of three months, Nanda left for Mathurā with the fond farewells of all the Yādavas. When the Yādavas finally saw that the rainy season was about to begin, they returned to Dvārakā, where they related all that had happened at Kurukṣetra to the residents of their capital.

Related values
Sthitaprajna (Steady Wisdom)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Discriminative WisdomShanti (Peace / Tranquility)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Seva (Service / Selfless Action)Saurya (Heroism / Bravery)
Related verses
Concepts
YogaLila
We desire what the Vraja gopīs, cowherd boys, and even aboriginal Pulinda women desire — the touch of dust He leaves on the plants and grass as He tends His cows. The simplest seekers' wish is the highest wish.
Reflection Questions
  • Whom do I dismiss as a 'simple' devotee whose desire is actually the deepest?
  • What does it mean to want what aboriginal women want?

The chapter's final image swings back to Vraja. The queens — every one of them, queen of Dvārakā — confess that the contact they want is the same contact the Vraja-gopīs want, the same the cowherd boys want, the same the aborigine Pulinda women want: the dust Kṛṣṇa leaves on grass and herbs while grazing cows. The verse erases the rank-difference between Dvārakā-queen and Pulinda-girl. The dust on Vraja's grass is the chapter's ultimate object — and the entire ten-canto Bhāgavata's.

The Pulinda women of Vraja

In SB 10.21.18-19, the Vraja-gopīs themselves describe how the aborigine Pulinda women, finding the kuṅkuma-stained grass where Kṛṣṇa's feet had pressed, would apply that grass to their faces and bodies and find their lust for their own husbands pacified by it. The simple tribal women, unlettered, became models of the highest bhakti — by mere contact with the dust.

The queens of Dvārakā here, narrating their elaborate svayaṁvaras and rākṣasa-vivāhas and tapas-marriages, end by saying: we want what the Pulinda women in Vraja want. The chapter's polyphony collapses into Vraja-rasa. Gauḍīya doctrine reads this verse as the Bhāgavatam's own quiet declaration that Vraja is the apex — Dvārakā's sixteen thousand queens look back toward Vraja and confess it.

📝 My note