FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.19.4

स चिन्तयन्नित्थमथाश‍ृणोद् यथा मुने: सुतोक्तो निऋर्तिस्तक्षकाख्य: । स साधु मेने न चिरेण तक्षका- नलं प्रसक्तस्य विरक्तिकारणम् ॥ ४ ॥
sa cintayann ittham athāśṛṇod yathā
[sa chintayann ittham athaashrinod yathaa]
muneḥ sutokto nirṛtis takṣakākhyaḥ
[muneh sutokto nirritis takshakaakhyah]
sa sādhu mene na cireṇa takṣakā-
[sa saadhu mene na chirena takshakaa-]
nalaṁ prasaktasya virakti-kāraṇam
[nalam prasaktasya virakti-kaaranam]
saḥ — he, the King cintayan — thinking ittham — like this atha — now aśṛṇot — heard yathā — as muneḥ — of the sage suta-uktaḥ — uttered by the son nirṛtiḥ — death takṣaka-ākhyaḥ — in relation with the snake-bird saḥ — he (the King) sādhu — well and good mene — accepted na — not cireṇa — very long time takṣaka — snake-bird analam — fire prasaktasya — for one who is too attached virakti — indifference kāraṇam — cause.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
sa cintayann ittham athāśṛṇod yathā
saḥ
he, the King
cintayan
thinking
ittham
like this
atha
now
aśṛṇot
heard
yathā
as
muneḥ sutokto nirṛtis takṣakākhyaḥ
muneḥ
of the sage
suta-uktaḥ
uttered by the son
nirṛtiḥ
death
takṣaka-ākhyaḥ
in relation with the snake-bird
sa sādhu mene na cireṇa takṣakā-
saḥ
he (the King)
sādhu
well and good
mene
accepted
na
not
cireṇa
very long time
takṣaka
snake-bird
nalaṁ prasaktasya virakti-kāraṇam
analam
fire
prasaktasya
for one who is too attached
virakti
indifference
kāraṇam
cause.
While the King was thus repenting, he received news of his imminent death, which would be due to the bite of a snake-bird, occasioned by the curse spoken by the sage’s son. The King accepted this as good news, for it would be the cause of his indifference toward worldly things.

Real happiness is achieved by spiritual existence or by cessation of the repetition of birth and death. One can stop the repetition of birth and death only by going back to Godhead. In the material world, even by attaining the topmost planet (Brahmaloka), one cannot get rid of the conditions of repeated birth and death, but still we do not accept the path of attaining perfection. The path of perfection frees one from all material attachments, and thus one becomes fit to enter into the spiritual kingdom. Therefore, those who are materially poverty-stricken are better candidates than those who are materially prosperous. Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a great devotee of the Lord and a bona fide candidate for entering into the kingdom of God, but even though he was so, his material assets as the Emperor of the world were setbacks to perfect attainment of his rightful status as one of the associates of the Lord in the spiritual sky. As a devotee of the Lord, he could understand that the cursing of the brāhmaṇa boy, although unwise, was a blessing upon him, being the cause of detachment from worldly affairs, both political and social. Śamīka Muni also, after regretting the incident, conveyed the news to the King as a matter of duty so that the King would be able to prepare himself to go back to Godhead. Śamīka Muni sent news to the King that foolish Śṛṅgi, his son, although a powerful brāhmaṇa boy, unfortunately had misused his spiritual power by cursing the King unwarrantedly. The incident of the King’s garlanding the muni was not sufficient cause for being cursed to death, but since there was no way to retract the curse, the King was informed to prepare for death within a week. Both Śamīka Muni and the King were self-realized souls. Śamīka Muni was a mystic, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a devotee. Therefore there was no difference between them in self-realization. Neither of them was afraid of meeting death. Mahārāja Parīkṣit could have gone to the muni to beg his pardon, but the news of imminent death was conveyed to the King with so much regret by the muni that the King did not want to shame the muni further by his presence there. He decided to prepare himself for his imminent death and find out the way to go back to Godhead.

The life of a human being is a chance to prepare oneself to go back to Godhead, or to get rid of the material existence, the repetition of birth and death. Thus in the system of varṇāśrama-dharma every man and woman is trained for this purpose. In other words, the system of varṇāśrama-dharma is known also as sanātana-dharma, or the eternal occupation. The system of varṇāśrama-dharma prepares a man for going back to Godhead, and thus a householder is ordered to go to the forest as a vānaprastha to acquire complete knowledge and then to take sannyāsa prior to his inevitable death. Parīkṣit Mahārāja was fortunate to get a seven-day notice to meet his inevitable death. But for the common man there is no definite notice, although death is inevitable for all. Foolish men forget this sure fact of death and neglect the duty of preparing themselves for going back to Godhead. They spoil their lives in animal propensities to eat, drink, be merry and enjoy. Such an irresponsible life is adopted by the people in the Age of Kali because of a sinful desire to condemn brahminical culture, God consciousness and cow protection, for which the state is responsible. The state must employ revenue to advance these three items and thus educate the populace to prepare for death. The state which does so is the real welfare state. The state of India should better follow the examples of Mahārāja Parīkṣit, the ideal executive head, than to imitate other materialistic states which have no idea of the kingdom of Godhead, the ultimate goal of human life. Deterioration of the ideals of Indian civilization has brought about the deterioration of civic life, not only in India but also abroad.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
As he was thus thinking, he heard about how he would die from the bite of Takṣaka because of the curse issued by the sage’s son. He considered it beneficial that soon the fire of Takṣaka would be the cause of detachment from material life.
Commentary

He heard how he would die from Takṣaka in seven days as pronounced by the son of the sage, from a student called Gauramukha sent by Śamīka. “O King! Hearing about the curse made by his ignorant son, regretting it repeatedly, our guru scolded his son and not seeing any remedy, fell into grief. Full of suffering he sent me to you with a message. Understanding this, the King should make preparations for departing.” When the messenger had departed, the King wanted to go there to beg forgiveness for his offense, but considering that the sage would be embarrassed, and also because he did not desire negation of the curse, he did not go. He considered the fiery poison of Takṣaka beneficial because it would produce detachment from all his attachments.

While repenting, he received news of his imminent death by snake-bird. He accepted this as good news — it would cause his indifference toward worldly things. The right news, properly received, is liberation.
Reflection Questions
  • What 'bad news' could I receive as good if I held it differently?
  • Where am I letting bad news bind me instead of free me?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 19