FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.5.24

सोऽहङ्कार इति प्रोक्तो विकुर्वन् समभूत्‍त्रिधा । वैकारिकस्तैजसश्च तामसश्चेति यद्भिदा । द्रव्यशक्ति: क्रियाशक्तिर्ज्ञानशक्तिरिति प्रभो ॥ २४ ॥
so ’haṅkāra iti prokto
[so ’hankaara iti prokto]
vikurvan samabhūt tridhā
[vikurvan samabhoot tridhaa]
vaikārikas taijasaś ca
[vaikaarikas taijasash cha]
tāmasaś ceti yad-bhidā
[taamasash cheti yad-bhidaa]
dravya-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
[dravya-shaktih kriyaa-shaktir]
jñāna-śaktir iti prabho
[jnaana-shaktir iti prabho]
saḥ — the very same thing ahaṅkāraḥ — ego iti — thus proktaḥ — said vikurvan — being transformed samabhūt — became manifested tridhā — in three features vaikārikaḥ — in the mode of goodness taijasaḥ — in the mode of passion ca — and tāmasaḥ — in the mode of ignorance ca — also iti — thus yat — what is bhidā — divided dravya-śaktiḥ — powers that evolve matter kriyā-śaktiḥ — initiation that creates jñāna-śaktiḥ — intelligence that guides iti — thus prabho — O master.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
so ’haṅkāra iti prokto
vikurvan samabhūt tridhā
saḥ
the very same thing
ahaṅkāraḥ
ego
vaikārikas taijasaś ca
tāmasaś ceti yad-bhidā
dravya-śaktiḥ kriyā-śaktir
jñāna-śaktir iti prabho
iti
thus
proktaḥ
said
vikurvan
being transformed
samabhūt
became manifested
tridhā
in three features
vaikārikaḥ
in the mode of goodness
taijasaḥ
in the mode of passion
ca
and
tāmasaḥ
in the mode of ignorance
ca
also
iti
thus
yat
what is
bhidā
divided
dravya-śaktiḥ
powers that evolve matter
kriyā-śaktiḥ
initiation that creates
jñāna-śaktiḥ
intelligence that guides
iti
thus
prabho
O master.
The self-centered materialistic ego, thus being transformed into three features, becomes known as the modes of goodness, passion and ignorance in three divisions, namely the powers that evolve matter, knowledge of material creations, and the intelligence that guides such materialistic activities. Nārada, you are quite competent to understand this.

Materialistic ego, or the sense of identification with matter, is grossly self-centered, devoid of clear knowledge of the existence of God. And this self-centered egoism of the materialistic living entities is the cause of their being conditioned by the other paraphernalia and continuing their bondage of material existence. In the Bhagavad-gītā this self-centered egoism is very nicely explained in the Seventh Chapter (verses 24 through 27). The self-centered impersonalist, without a clear conception of the Personality of Godhead, concludes in his own way that the Personality of Godhead takes a material shape from His original impersonal spiritual existence for a particular mission. And this misleading conception of the Supreme Lord by the self-centered impersonalist continues, even though he is seen to be very interested in the Vedic literatures such as the Brahma-sūtras and other highly intellectual sources of knowledge. This ignorance of the personal feature of the Lord is due simply to ignorance of the mixture of different modes. The impersonalist thus cannot conceive of the Lord’s eternal spiritual form of eternal knowledge, bliss and existence. The reason is that the Lord reserves the right of not exposing Himself to the nondevotee who, even after a thorough study of literature like the Bhagavad-gītā, remains an impersonalist simply by obstinacy. This obstinacy is due to the action of yoga-māyā, a personal energy of the Lord that acts like an aide-de-camp by covering the vision of the obstinate impersonalist. Such a bewildered human being is described as mūḍha, or grossly ignorant, because he is unable to understand the transcendental form of the Lord as being unborn and unchangeable. If the Lord takes a form or material shape from His original impersonal feature, then it means that He is born and changeable from impersonal to personal. But He is not changeable. Nor does He ever take a new birth like a conditioned soul. The conditioned soul may take a form birth after birth due to his conditional existence in matter, but the self-centered impersonalists, by their gross ignorance, accept the Lord as one of them because of self-centered egoism, even after so-called advancement of knowledge in the Vedānta. The Lord, being situated in the heart of every individual living entity, knows very well the tendency of such conditioned souls in terms of past, present and future, but the bewildered conditioned soul hardly can know Him in His eternal form. By the will of the Lord, therefore, the impersonalist, even after knowing the Brahman and Paramātmā features of the Lord, remains ignorant of His eternal personal feature as ever-existent Nārāyaṇa, transcendental to all material creation.

The cause of such gross ignorance is constant engagement by the materialistic man in the matter of artificially increasing material demands. To realize the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one has to purify the materialistic senses by devotional service. The mode of goodness, or the brahminical culture recommended in the Vedic literatures, is helpful to such spiritual realization, and thus the jñāna-śakti stage of the conditioned soul is comparatively better than the other two stages, namely dravya-śakti and kriyā-śakti. The whole material civilization is manifested by a huge accumulation of materials, or in other words, raw materials for industrial purposes, and the industrial enterprises ( kriyā-śakti ) are all due to gross ignorance of spiritual life. In order to rectify this great anomaly of materialistic civilization, based on the principles of dravya-śakti and kriyā-śakti, one has to adopt the process of devotional service of the Lord by adoption of the principles of karma-yoga, mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā (9.27) as follows:

yat karoṣi yad aśnāsi yaj juhoṣi dadāsi yat yat tapasyasi kaunteya tat kuruṣva mad-arpaṇam

“O son of Kuntī, all that you do, all that you eat, all that you offer and give away, as well as all austerities that you may perform, should be done as an offering unto Me.”

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
That ahaṅkāra transforms into three types: derived from sattva, rajas and tamas, called jñāna-śakti, kriyā-śakti and dravya-śakti.
Commentary

The three divisions are described: that derived from sattva-guṇa (vaikārikaḥ), from rajoguṇa (taijasaḥ) and from tamoguṇa (tāmasaḥ). The qualities in verse order are drayva, kriyā and jñāna śaktis. The dravya-śakti has the capacity to produce the five gross elements starting with ether. The kriyā-śakti has the capacity to produce the senses. The jñāna-śakti has the capacity to produce the sense devatās. O Nārada (prabho)! You know all of this. The state of equilibrium is pradhāna. By the agitation of time, the predominance of sattva produces the mahat-tattva. Predominance of rajas produces the sūtra-tattva, a type of mahat-tattva. Predominance of tamas produces ahaṅkāra. The effect of ahaṅkāra, with predominance of tamas and with rajas and sattva elements in much less amount, produces the five gross elements. In this covering on the jīva (ahaṅkāra), there is a predominance of tamas.

Self-centered ego — identifying with matter — keeps the conditioned soul bound. Even sharp impersonalists, without grasping the Personality of the Lord, stay in this trap. Sharp intellect alone is not the same as clear vision.
Reflection Questions
  • Is my spiritual study going somewhere real, or is it polishing the ego I am supposed to be transcending?
  • What would soften my self-centered identification with my body and mind today?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 5