FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 2.10.35

अमुनी भगवद्रूपे मया ते ह्यनुवर्णिते । उभे अपि न गृह्णन्ति मायासृष्टे विपश्चित: ॥ ३५ ॥
amunī bhagavad-rūpe
[amunee bhagavad-roope]
mayā te hy anuvarṇite
[mayaa te hy anuvarnite]
ubhe api na gṛhṇanti
[ubhe api na grihnanti]
māyā-sṛṣṭe vipaścitaḥ
[maayaa-srishte vipashchitah]
amunī — all these bhagavat — unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead rūpe — in the forms mayā — by me te — unto you hi — certainly anuvarṇite — described respectively ubhe — both api — also na — never gṛhṇanti — accepts māyā — external sṛṣṭe — being so manifested vipaḥ-citaḥ — the learned one who knows.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
amunī bhagavad-rūpe
amunī
all these
bhagavat
unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead
rūpe
in the forms
mayā te hy anuvarṇite
mayā
by me
te
unto you
hi
certainly
anuvarṇite
described respectively
ubhe api na gṛhṇanti
ubhe
both
api
also
na
never
gṛhṇanti
accepts
māyā-sṛṣṭe vipaścitaḥ
māyā
external
sṛṣṭe
being so manifested
vipaḥ-citaḥ
the learned one who knows.
Neither of the above forms of the Lord, as just described unto you from the material angle of vision, is accepted by the pure devotees of the Lord who know Him well.

The impersonalists think of the Absolute Personality of Godhead in two different ways, as above mentioned. On the one hand they worship the Lord in His viśva-rūpa, or all-pervading universal form, and on the other they think of the Lord’s unmanifested, indescribable, subtle form. The theories of pantheism and monism are respectively applicable to these two conceptions of the Supreme as gross and subtle, but both of them are rejected by the learned pure devotees of the Lord because they are aware of the factual position. This is very clearly mentioned in the Eleventh Chapter of the Bhagavad-gītā, which records Arjuna’s experience of the viśva-rūpa of the Supreme Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa:

adṛṣṭa-pūrvaṁ hṛṣito ’smi dṛṣṭvā bhayena ca pravyathitaṁ mano me tad eva me darśaya deva rūpaṁ prasīda deveśa jagan-nivāsa

(Bg. 11.45)

Arjuna, as a pure devotee of the Lord, never previously saw the contemplated universal form of the Lord ( viśva-rūpa ), but when he did see it, his curiosities were satisfied. But he was not happy to see such a form of the Lord because of his attachment as a pure devotee. He was afraid to see the gigantic form of the Lord. He therefore prayed to the Lord to assume His four-handed Nārāyaṇa or Kṛṣṇa form, which alone could please Arjuna. Undoubtedly the Lord has the supreme potency to exhibit Himself in multifarious forms, but the pure devotees of the Lord are interested in His forms as eternally exhibited in the abode of the Lord, known as the tripād-vibhūti or kingdom of God. The Lord in the tripād-vibhūti abode exhibits Himself in two forms, either with four hands or with two hands. The viśva-rūpa exhibited in the material manifestation has unlimited hands and unlimited dimensions with everything unlimited. The pure devotees of the Lord worship Him in His Vaikuṇṭha forms as Nārāyaṇa or Kṛṣṇa. Sometimes the same Vaikuṇṭha forms of the Lord are in the material world also by His grace as Śrī Rāma, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, Śrī Narasiṁhadeva, etc., and thus the pure devotees also worship them. Usually the features shown in the material world have no existence in the Vaikuṇṭha planets, and thus they are not accepted by the pure devotees. What the pure devotees worship from the very beginning are eternal forms of the Lord existing in the Vaikuṇṭha planets. The nondevotee impersonalists imagine the material forms of the Lord, and ultimately they merge in the impersonal brahmajyoti of the Lord, whereas the pure devotees of the Lord are worshipers of the Lord both in the beginning and also in the perfect stage of salvation, eternally. The worship of the pure devotee never stops, whereas the worship of the impersonalist stops after his attainment of salvation, when he merges in the impersonal form of the Lord known as the brahmajyoti. Therefore the pure devotees of the Lord are described here as vipaścita, or the learned who are in the knowledge of the Lord perfectly.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The wise do not accept these two forms of the Lord described by me since they are composed of matter.
Commentary

Śukadeva condemns these two forms which are imposed on the form of the Lord for purposes of worship. Dual case indicates the oneness of the gross and subtle forms of the universe (samaṣṭi) and its coverings (mahā-samaṣṭi). The wise do not accept these two forms as the object of attainment, but only as forms for worship at the beginning stage, since they are made of māyā. Even the very subtle form, the cause of the others, is material. Those who are wise, the pure devotees (vipaścitaḥ), do not accept these forms even at the first stage. They accept the forms of Rāma, Kṛṣṇa, and Nṛsiṁha made of śuddha-sattva in the stages of sādhana and perfection.

Related verses
Pure devotees who know the Lord don't accept either the gross universal form or the subtle unmanifested form as final. Pantheism and monism map onto these two; bhakti goes beyond both. The devotee knows the actual position.
Reflection Questions
  • Have I unconsciously settled for pantheism or monism instead of the personal Lord?
  • What in me resists going past either picture to a personal relationship?
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 10