FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 1.5.2

నారద ఉవాచ పారాశర్య మహాభాగ భవత: కచ్చిదాత్మనా । పరితుష్యతి శారీర ఆత్మా మానస ఏవ వా ॥ ౨ ॥
nārada uvāca
[naarada uvaacha]
pārāśarya mahā-bhāga
[paaraasharya mahaa-bhaaga]
bhavataḥ kaccid ātmanā
[bhavatah kachchid aatmanaa]
parituṣyati śārīra
[paritushyati shaareera]
ātmā mānasa eva vā
[aatmaa maanasa eva vaa]
nāradaḥ — Nārada uvāca — said pārāśarya — O son of Parāśara mahā-bhāga — the greatly fortunate bhavataḥ — your kaccit — if it is ātmanā — by the self-realization of parituṣyati — does it satisfy śārīraḥ — identifying the body ātmā — self mānasaḥ — identifying the mind eva — certainly vā — and.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
nārada uvāca
nāradaḥ
Nārada
uvāca
said
pārāśarya mahā-bhāga
pārāśarya
O son of Parāśara
mahā-bhāga
the greatly fortunate
bhavataḥ
your
bhavataḥ kaccid ātmanā
kaccit
if it is
ātmanā
by the self-realization of
parituṣyati śārīra
parituṣyati
does it satisfy
śārīraḥ
identifying the body
ātmā mānasa eva vā
ātmā
self
mānasaḥ
identifying the mind
eva
certainly
vā
and.
Addressing Vyāsadeva, the son of Parāśara, Nārada inquired: Are you satisfied by identifying with the body or the mind as objects of self-realization?

This was a hint by Nārada to Vyāsadeva regarding the cause of his despondency. Vyāsadeva, as the descendant of Parāśara, a greatly powerful sage, had the privilege of having a great parentage which should not have given Vyāsadeva cause for despondency. Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyāsadeva should not have done so. One cannot be cheerful by nature unless one is factually seated in self-realization, which is transcendental to the material body and mind.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
Nārada said: Great soul, son of Parāśara! If you think you are your body, is your body pleased with your body or not? Or if you think you are your mind, is your mind pleased with your mind or not?
Commentary

Śārīraḥ ātmā here means “identifying oneself with the body.” Is this self satisfied with the body (ātmanā)? Is your self identifying with the mind (mānasa ātmā) satisfied with the mind (ātmanā)? Kaccid means “or not.” Addressing Vyāsa as the most fortunate son of Parāśara, Nārada suggests that if Vyāsa possesses such powerful ancestry, how could he lament? Thus he implies disappointment in Vyāsa.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 5