Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.88.32
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
-
na vayam śraddadhīmahi
—
We cannot place faith (in his words)
Contiguous-join (na + vayam + śraddadhīmahi). The royal 'we' wields śraddhā as a lever — Hari withholds it publicly to make Vṛka withhold it too. Gauḍīyas note: śraddhā misplaced or withheld is a hinge of fate.
-
dakṣa-śāpāt
—
by Dakṣa's curse
Contiguous (dakṣa + śāpāt). The historical reference. The chapter is willing to use intra-deva history to discredit Śiva's reliability in front of Vṛka. The verse's truth is selective but not false.
-
paiśācyam
—
the quality of the Piśācas
From piśāca — flesh-eating demoniac being. Compound: piśācya = having piśāca-nature. The taunt that lands on Vṛka, who has just been eating his own flesh (v.17). Hari hands him the mirror without naming it.
-
preta-piśāca rāṭ
—
king of the Pretas and Piśācas
Contiguous-join (preta-piśāca + rāṭ). Rāṭ = ruler. Hari names Śiva by his ghost-king office — not by his cosmic office. The angle is calculated. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's strategic speech is itself an instrument of līlā.
Lord of the Pretas and Piśācas means that he gives them respect or shares their qualities.
nOne Being master of the Pretas and Piśācas means that he gives them respect or shares their qualities.
A senior judge confidentially tells the witness: 'I would not put weight on what that other official said — there is a record of his being cursed once, you know.' The opening of the trap is judicial: Hari raises a public, attested incident against Śiva, knowing the asura will be the kind of mind that respects gossip over scripture.
Dakṣa, Sati's father, slighted Śiva publicly at his yajña; Sati gave up her body in protest, Śiva's anger destroyed the sacrifice, and in the older Purāṇic and Bhāgavata recountings Dakṣa is said to have cursed Śiva to wander with ghosts and goblins (referenced here and developed at SB 4.2-7).
Hari uses this attested episode to seed doubt — not falsehood, but selectively framed truth, designed to land on Vṛka's transactional reasoning. Gauḍīya reading: Bhagavān can use even unflattering facts about other devas when the asura's logic requires it, because His larger purpose is Mahādeva's rescue.
My note
Source: vedabase.io