FolioCorpusŚrīmad-Bhāgavatam

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 10.88.32

श्रीभगवानुवाच एवं चेत्तर्हि तद्वाक्यं न वयं श्रद्दधीमहि । यो दक्षशापात् पैशाच्यं प्राप्त: प्रेतपिशाचराट् ॥ ३२ ॥
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
[shree-bhagavaan uvaacha]
evaṁ cet tarhi tad-vākyaṁ
[evam chet tarhi tad-vaakyam]
na vayaṁ śraddadhīmahi
[na vayam shraddadheemahi]
yo dakṣa-śāpāt paiśācyaṁ
[yo daksha-shaapaat paishaachyam]
prāptaḥ preta-piśāca-rāṭ
[praaptah preta-pishaacha-raat]
śrī - bhagavān uvāca — the Supreme Lord said evam — such cet — if tarhi — then tat — his vākyam — in the statements na — not vayam — We śraddadhīmahi — can place faith yaḥ — who dakṣa - śāpāt — by the curse of Dakṣa Prajāpati paiśācyam — the qualities of the Piśācas (a class of carnivorous demons) prāptaḥ — obtained preta - piśāca — of the Pretas (ghosts) and Piśācas rāṭ — the king .
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
śrī - bhagavān uvāca
the Supreme Lord said
evaṁ cet tarhi tad-vākyaṁ
evam
such
cet
if
tarhi
then
tat
his
vākyam
in the statements
na vayaṁ śraddadhīmahi
na
not
vayam
We
śraddadhīmahi
can place faith
yo dakṣa-śāpāt paiśācyaṁ
yaḥ
who
dakṣa - śāpāt
by the curse of Dakṣa Prajāpati
paiśācyam
the qualities of the Piśācas (a class of carnivorous demons)
prāptaḥ preta-piśāca-rāṭ
prāptaḥ
obtained
preta - piśāca
of the Pretas (ghosts) and Piśācas
rāṭ
the king .
  • na vayam śraddadhīmahi — We cannot place faith (in his words)
    Contiguous-join (na + vayam + śraddadhīmahi). The royal 'we' wields śraddhā as a lever — Hari withholds it publicly to make Vṛka withhold it too. Gauḍīyas note: śraddhā misplaced or withheld is a hinge of fate.
  • dakṣa-śāpāt — by Dakṣa's curse
    Contiguous (dakṣa + śāpāt). The historical reference. The chapter is willing to use intra-deva history to discredit Śiva's reliability in front of Vṛka. The verse's truth is selective but not false.
  • paiśācyam — the quality of the Piśācas
    From piśāca — flesh-eating demoniac being. Compound: piśācya = having piśāca-nature. The taunt that lands on Vṛka, who has just been eating his own flesh (v.17). Hari hands him the mirror without naming it.
  • preta-piśāca rāṭ — king of the Pretas and Piśācas
    Contiguous-join (preta-piśāca + rāṭ). Rāṭ = ruler. Hari names Śiva by his ghost-king office — not by his cosmic office. The angle is calculated. Gauḍīyas: Bhagavān's strategic speech is itself an instrument of līlā.
The Supreme Lord said: If this is the case, We cannot believe what Śiva says. Śiva is the same lord of the Pretas and Piśācas whom Dakṣa cursed to become like a carnivorous hobgoblin.
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
The Supreme Lord said: If this is the case, We cannot believe what Śiva says. Śiva is the same lord of the Pretas and Piśācas whom Dakṣa cursed to become like a carnivorous hobgoblin.
Jīva Gosvāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

Lord of the Pretas and Piśācas means that he gives them respect or shares their qualities.

Śrīdhara Svāmī Gauḍīya
Commentary

nOne Being master of the Pretas and Piśācas means that he gives them respect or shares their qualities.

Related values
Nyaya (Justice / Righteous Judgment)Daya (Compassion / Mercy)Vairagya (Detachment / Dispassion)Apaishunam (Non-slander)Discriminative WisdomAsteya (Non-stealing / Honesty)Tapas (Austerity / Discipline)Pratijna (Vow-keeping / Sacred Resolve)Abhaya (Fearlessness)Satya (Truthfulness)
Related verses
Concepts
Jiva
If that is so, We cannot believe Śiva — he is lord of pretas and piśācas. Kṛṣṇa plants doubt about the very deity whose boon Vṛkāsura is testing — strategic skepticism rescues the situation.
Reflection Questions
  • Where could planting one strategic doubt redirect a destructive course?
  • When was sown doubt actually the mercy I needed?

A senior judge confidentially tells the witness: 'I would not put weight on what that other official said — there is a record of his being cursed once, you know.' The opening of the trap is judicial: Hari raises a public, attested incident against Śiva, knowing the asura will be the kind of mind that respects gossip over scripture.

Dakṣa-yajña and Śiva's curse

Dakṣa, Sati's father, slighted Śiva publicly at his yajña; Sati gave up her body in protest, Śiva's anger destroyed the sacrifice, and in the older Purāṇic and Bhāgavata recountings Dakṣa is said to have cursed Śiva to wander with ghosts and goblins (referenced here and developed at SB 4.2-7).

Hari uses this attested episode to seed doubt — not falsehood, but selectively framed truth, designed to land on Vṛka's transactional reasoning. Gauḍīya reading: Bhagavān can use even unflattering facts about other devas when the asura's logic requires it, because His larger purpose is Mahādeva's rescue.

📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 88