FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 9.18.32

రాజపుత్ర్యార్థితోఽపత్యే ధర్మం చావేక్ష్య ధర్మవిత్ । స్మరఞ్ఛుక్రవచ: కాలే దిష్టమేవాభ్యపద్యత ॥ ౩౨ ॥
rāja-putryārthito ’patye
[raaja-putryaarthito ’patye]
dharmaṁ cāvekṣya dharmavit
[dharmam chaavekshya dharmavit]
smaraṣ chukra-vacaḥ kāle
[smarash chukra-vachah kaale]
diṣṭam evābhyapadyata
[dishtam evaabhyapadyata]
rāja-putryā — by Śarmiṣṭhā, who was the daughter of a king arthitaḥ — being requested apatye — for a son dharmam — religious principles ca — as well as avekṣya — considering dharma-vit — aware of all religious principles smaran — remembering śukra-vacaḥ — the warning of Śukrācārya kāle — at the time diṣṭam — circumstantially eva — indeed abhyapadyata — accepted (to fulfill the desire of Śarmiṣṭhā).
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
rāja-putryārthito ’patye
rāja-putryā
by Śarmiṣṭhā, who was the daughter of a king
arthitaḥ
being requested
dharmaṁ cāvekṣya dharmavit
smaraṣ chukra-vacaḥ kāle
diṣṭam evābhyapadyata
apatye
for a son
dharmam
religious principles
ca
as well as
avekṣya
considering
dharma-vit
aware of all religious principles
smaran
remembering
śukra-vacaḥ
the warning of Śukrācārya
kāle
at the time
diṣṭam
circumstantially
eva
indeed
abhyapadyata
accepted (to fulfill the desire of Śarmiṣṭhā).
When Princess Śarmiṣṭhā begged King Yayāti for a son, the King was certainly aware of the principles of religion, and therefore he agreed to fulfill her desire. Although he remembered the warning of Śukrācārya, he thought of this union as the desire of the Supreme, and thus he had sex with Śarmiṣṭhā.

King Yayāti was completely aware of the duty of a kṣatriya. When a kṣatriya is approached by a woman, he cannot deny her. This is a religious principle. Consequently, when Dharmarāja, Yudhiṣṭhira, saw Arjuna unhappy after Arjuna returned from Dvārakā, he asked whether Arjuna had refused a woman who had begged for a son. Although Mahārāja Yayāti remembered Śukrācārya’s warning, he could not refuse Śarmiṣṭhā. He thought it wise to give her a son, and thus he had sexual intercourse with her after her menstrual period. This kind of lust is not against religious principles. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (7.11) , dharmāviruddho bhūteṣu kāmo ’smi: sex life not contrary to the principles of religion is sanctioned by Kṛṣṇa. Because Śarmiṣṭhā, the daughter of a king, had begged Yayāti for a son, their combination was not lust but an act of religion.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
When Princess Śarmiṣṭhā begged King Yayāti for a son, the King, aware of dharma, considered the principles of religion, and, though he remembered the words of Śukrācārya, he accepted what was arranged by fate at that time. It is dharma to fulfill her desire, when she requests at the time of conception for having a son. Knowing this and remembering the words of Śukrācārya forbidding a relationship with Śarmiṣṭhā, he wavered in his mind, but then accepted the union as it was attained by fate.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 18