Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.6.16
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
In the previous verses the supremacy of the Personality of Godhead has been established in relation to the living entity and material nature. In this verse it is clearly stated that Lord Kṛṣṇa is the source of the greatest Viṣṇu incarnation, Mahā-Viṣṇu, and that Mahā-Viṣṇu acquires His creative potency from Lord Kṛṣṇa. It would therefore be foolish to surmise that Lord Kṛṣṇa is an expansion of Viṣṇu. In this regard the opinion of the demigods, headed by Brahmā, can be taken as final.
- Before starting any creative work today, pause and explicitly acknowledge Kṛṣṇa as the source of the potency you are about to deploy.
- When you feel proud of something you produced — a project, an idea, even a child raised well — name the borrowed energy behind it and offer the credit upward.
- Refuse the modern reflex that says "I made this" and replace it with "this was made through me" at least once today, in writing or aloud.
- If even Mahā-Viṣṇu's universe-impregnating potency is borrowed from Kṛṣṇa, what tiny scrap of my own ability am I still secretly claiming as self-generated?
- Where in my life have I confused being a conduit of Kṛṣṇa's energy with being its origin, and what has that confusion cost me?
- Before an exam or audition, instead of pumping yourself up with "I've got this," quietly acknowledge that the intelligence and stamina you're about to use are on loan from Kṛṣṇa.
- When a post or project of yours goes viral or gets praised by friends, resist the dopamine rush of ownership and tell at least one person where the real credit belongs.
- When you compare yourself to a peer who seems more gifted, remember that their potency is borrowed too — envy makes no sense toward a fellow conduit.
- When a deal closes, a project ships, or a child does something that makes you proud, name Kṛṣṇa as the source of that potency before you accept any congratulations.
- In family financial decisions, act with full effort and infallible diligence, but speak and plan as a steward of Kṛṣṇa's energy rather than as its owner.
- Teach your children, by your phrasing at the dinner table, that abilities are received and offered — not manufactured and possessed.
- Look back on the career or family you built and consciously re-assign the credit — out loud, to a younger relative or student — to the Lord who lent you the potency.
- As physical and mental powers wane, take it not as loss but as the natural withdrawal of borrowed energies, and use that clarity to deepen surrender.
- Mentor someone younger by showing them, in your own example, what it looks like to wield potency without claiming it — the legacy that outlasts the body.
- Treating "Kṛṣṇa is the source" as a slogan recited after the work, rather than a conviction held while doing it.
- Sliding into impersonalism — speaking of "the source" or "the universal energy" instead of the personal Kṛṣṇa from whom Mahā-Viṣṇu Himself receives potency.
- Demoting Kṛṣṇa to one Viṣṇu among many, when this verse establishes Him as the source of even the greatest Viṣṇu expansion.
- Share one ability you have privately considered "yours" — and discuss what changes if you take seriously that even Mahā-Viṣṇu's potency is borrowed.
- Where does it become genuinely difficult to say Kṛṣṇa is the source — in art, in parenting, in earning a living — and why does that specific arena resist the teaching?
- If Brahmā and the demigods themselves had to settle the question of Kṛṣṇa's supremacy, what does that say about our confidence in settling it from our own reasoning?
A talented colleague has just won a major award and is being publicly celebrated as a "self-made" creative force. They corner you afterwards and ask, sincerely, whether you think they earned it. Speak to them as a fellow practitioner who has internalized this verse — neither flattering them nor lecturing them — and help them see the borrowed potency without diminishing their effort.
- If every potency ultimately traces back to Kṛṣṇa, then my effort is meaningless — I'm just a puppet, and there's no real reason to strive.
The verse does not erase the agent; it locates the agent correctly. Mahā-Viṣṇu still acts, still impregnates material nature, still produces the mahat-tattva — but with amogha-vīrya, infallible potency, precisely because it is sourced in Kṛṣṇa. Your effort matters more, not less, when you stop pretending it is self-powered. - Why insist Kṛṣṇa is the source of Mahā-Viṣṇu? Most traditions treat Viṣṇu as supreme and Kṛṣṇa as one of His avatāras.
This verse states the reverse plainly: Mahā-Viṣṇu acquires His creative potency from Kṛṣṇa. Prabhupāda notes that the opinion of the demigods headed by Brahmā can be taken as final on this point. The Gauḍīya line is not inventing a hierarchy; it is reading the śāstra as it stands.
My note
Source: vedabase.io