FolioCorpusBhagavad-gītā

Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 11.10.17

తత్రాపి కర్మణాం కర్తురస్వాతన్‍త్ర్‍యం చ లక్ష్యతే । భోక్తుశ్చ దు:ఖసుఖయో: కో న్వర్థో వివశం భజేత్ ॥ ౧౭ ॥
tatrāpi karmaṇāṁ kartur
[tatraapi karmanaam kartur]
asvātantryaṁ ca lakṣyate
[asvaatantryam cha lakshyate]
bhoktuś ca duḥkha-sukhayoḥ
[bhoktush cha duhkha-sukhayoh]
ko nv artho vivaśaṁ bhajet
[ko nv artho vivasham bhajet]
tatra — in the matter of one’s ability to obtain happiness api — furthermore karmaṇām — of fruitive activities kartuḥ — of the performer asvātantryam — the lack of independence ca — also lakṣyate — is clearly seen bhoktuḥ — of the one who is trying to enjoy ca — also duḥkha-sukhayoḥ — happiness and unhappiness kaḥ — what nu — indeed arthaḥ — value vivaśam — for one who is not in control bhajet — can be derived.
Blended reading (Sanskrit + English inline)
tatrāpi karmaṇāṁ kartur
tatra
in the matter of one’s ability to obtain happiness
api
furthermore
karmaṇām
of fruitive activities
kartuḥ
of the performer
asvātantryaṁ ca lakṣyate
asvātantryam
the lack of independence
ca
also
lakṣyate
is clearly seen
bhoktuś ca duḥkha-sukhayoḥ
bhoktuḥ
of the one who is trying to enjoy
ca
also
duḥkha-sukhayoḥ
happiness and unhappiness
kaḥ
what
nu
indeed
ko nv artho vivaśaṁ bhajet
arthaḥ
value
vivaśam
for one who is not in control
bhajet
can be derived.
Although the performer of fruitive activities desires perpetual happiness, it is clearly observed that materialistic workers are often unhappy and only occasionally satisfied, thus proving that they are not independent or in control of their destiny. When a person is always under the superior control of another, how can he expect any valuable results from his own fruitive actions?

Although materialistic persons reject Kṛṣṇa consciousness and instead pursue temporary sense gratification, even that sense gratification is often beyond their reach. If a person could really control his destiny, why would he create problems for himself? No intelligent person would impose death, old age or disease upon himself or his loved ones. One should recognize that these unwanted miseries are forced upon one by a higher power. Since we are all obviously under superior control, the atheistic philosophy advising one to simply perform fruitive activities and create a happy life is most imperfect.

Due to the influence of time, happiness and misery are created. When a woman becomes pregnant, her husband, relatives and friends eagerly await the birth of the child. As time passes and the child is born, everyone feels great happiness. But as the child grows into old age and eventually dies, that same passage of time is a cause of suffering. Ignorant persons vainly seek help from scientists who work feverishly and fruitlessly in their laboratories to stop death. In modern times, inventions have been created to eliminate the inconveniences of life, but the maintenance and production of such conveniences has proven to be unbearably inconvenient for hundreds of millions of people throughout the world. Only the most foolish person will propose that there is no superior controller and that one can achieve favorable results by expert performance of material activities. Ultimately all material activities are useless because they end in annihilation. If one is driving a car but has only limited control, the situation is most dangerous and must lead inevitably to disaster. Similarly, although we are trying to direct the material body to happiness, we are not in full control of the bodily demands, and therefore there will inevitably be disaster. As stated in Bhagavad-gītā (9.3) :

aśraddadhānāḥ puruṣā dharmasyāsya parantapa aprāpya māṁ nivartante mṛtyu-saṁsāra-vartmani

“Those who are not faithful on the path of devotional service cannot attain Me, O conqueror of foes, but return to birth and death in this material world.” If one is not a devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa, the eventual result of his activities is simply mṛtyu-saṁsāra — repeated birth and death.

— A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupāda
Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura Gauḍīya
Translation
It can be seen that the performer of karmas is powerless since he experiences both happiness and suffering. What goal is achieved by helplessness? The performer of karmas is seen to be powerless in his enjoyment since he experiences happiness and suffering from performing his actions. Who would choose to enjoy suffering if he were completely independent? What discerning person would perform sinful acts? Thus, he is actually powerless.
Materialists chase happiness yet remain bound by a higher power — proving fruitive action under another's control can never yield lasting reward.
Practical Applications
  • Today, name one outcome you have been straining to control — aging, a child's success, a job result — and consciously offer it back to Kṛṣṇa, the actual controller.
  • When a small frustration hits (traffic, a delayed email, a sore back), pause and say plainly to yourself, "I am not in charge here," and let that puncture the illusion of independent doership.
  • Refuse the assumption that more effort guarantees more happiness; instead, devote one task today purely as service, expecting no proportional reward.
Reflection Questions
  • Where in my life am I still operating as if I am the independent kartā, despite repeated evidence that disease, loss, and time override my plans?
  • What "valuable result" am I expecting from activities performed under conditions I do not actually control, and what would change if I admitted my vivaśa state?
For Each Age Group
youth
  • Notice the next time you refresh a grade portal, a follower count, or a message thread expecting a specific outcome — and admit aloud that the result is not yours to command.
  • When a friend group, exam result, or admission decision goes against you, resist the urge to blame yourself entirely; recognize the hand of time and a higher controller rather than spiraling into self-recrimination.
  • Choose one daily effort — study, practice, a workout — and perform it as offering rather than as a transaction expected to pay out in status or scores.
householder
  • When making a major family decision — a move, a school, a job change — plan diligently, then explicitly hand the outcome to Kṛṣṇa instead of carrying it as private anxiety into the night.
  • Watch yourself the next time a child or spouse disappoints your expectation; ask whether you were treating them as a fruit you were entitled to, given the effort you invested.
  • Refuse the householder myth that one more raise, one more upgrade, one more renovation will finally secure happiness — and redirect at least one such pursuit this month into family sādhana.
senior
  • When the body sends its daily signals — stiffness, fatigue, a new diagnosis — receive them as direct instruction from a higher controller rather than as personal failures to be fought off.
  • Identify one attachment you are still gripping (a property, a reputation, a grievance) and begin loosening it now, while you can do so deliberately rather than have it stripped by time.
  • Mentor a younger person not by selling them the story of your achievements, but by honestly naming where you mistook yourself for the controller and what that cost you.
Common Pitfalls
  • Hearing "we are not in control" and sliding into fatalism or passivity, rather than redirecting effort toward devotional service.
  • Acknowledging higher control intellectually while continuing to invest emotional weight in fruitive outcomes — surrender in theory, anxiety in practice.
  • Using this verse to dismiss others' material struggles as deserved, instead of letting it soften one's own pride and self-importance.
Discussion Prompts
  • Share a concrete instance where you worked hard for a result and circumstances overrode your effort — did that experience push you toward Kṛṣṇa or toward more clever planning?
  • Prabhupāda compares our situation to driving a car with only limited control. Where in your daily life do you most pretend you have full control, and what does pretending cost you?
  • If material activities ultimately end in annihilation, how do you justify the time and energy you still pour into them — and where is the honest line between duty and attachment?
Role Play

One student plays a successful professional in their forties who has just received a serious medical diagnosis and is furious that "after everything I built, this is happening to me." The other student, as a friend grounded in this verse, must respond without platitudes — acknowledging the pain while gently exposing the assumption of independent control that made the diagnosis feel like a betrayal.

Objections & Responses
  • This sounds like an excuse for resignation — if I'm not in control, why bother trying to improve my life or the world at all?
    The verse does not forbid action; it dismantles the illusion of independent doership. A devotee works harder than a karmī, but works as an instrument of Kṛṣṇa, not as the proprietor of results — that is karma-yoga, not resignation.
  • Modern science and medicine have dramatically reduced disease and extended life — doesn't this prove humans actually do control their destiny to a meaningful degree?
    Prabhupāda directly addresses this: each convenience invented creates new inconveniences for hundreds of millions, and death, old age, and disease remain undefeated. Extending the average lifespan by a few years is not control; it is rearrangement within a system whose terms we did not set.
📝 My note

← Read full Chapter 10